The URL can be used to link to this page

06/19/2006 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionAGENDA ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Monday, June 19, 2006 7:00 PM Eagan Municipal Center City Council Chambers Workshop-Eagan Room 6:00-7:00 CIP and Park Dedication Fees Conference Rooms 2 A&B 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance pm II. Adopt Agenda 7:01 pm III. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 15, 2006 7:02 pm IV. Visitors to be Heard 7:03 pm. V. Director's Update Pages 3-4 7:04 pm VI. Consent Agenda 7:14 pm A. Kennealy Ridge Apartments-Sunrise Properties Pages 5-6 B. Eagan Hills Alliance Church Page 7 VII. Development Proposals A. Novus -Manley Commercial Addition Pages 8-12 7:15 pm VIII. Old Business 7:30 pm A. Patrick Eagan Park Master Plan Update IX. New Business A. 2007 Fees and Charges Page 13 7:33 pm X. Water Resources Update Al Water Quality Management Plan Update-Member Belfiori 7:50 pm XI. Other Business and Reports 7:55 pm A. Subcommittee reports XII. Round Table 7:56 pm XIII. Adjournment 8:00 pm The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the event. I fa notice of less than 96 hours is received the City will attempt to provide the aids. Next Advisory Parks Commission Meeting Monday, July 17, 2006 ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION 2006-07 MEETING SCHEDULE NAME May 15 June 19 July 17 Aug 14 Sept 18 Oct 16 Nov 20 Dec 18 Jan 11* Feb 15* Mar 19 April 16 Joseph Bari X Phil Belfiori, Secretary 0* Margo Danner X N. Mark Filipi X Laurie Halverson (alternate) x Duane L. Hansen X Muhammed Lodhi X Dorothy Peterson, Chair X Richard Pletcher, V.Chalr X Ryan Zipf X X = Otl absent 0* staff of absence prior to meeting 1 Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee Ryan Zipf Muhammed Lodhi Dorothy Peterson Richard Pletcher N Mark Filipi Joseph Bari Laurie Halverson Duane Hansen Margo Danner Phil Belfiori UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES APrC work plan for 2006/07 Patrick Eagan Park Ad Hoc Committee: Duane Hansen Dorothy Peterson Margo Danner Joseph Bari ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION 20f6.t17 MEMBERS NAME ANDADDRESS TERM ' TELEPHOIE, T START ,tIRESe? JOSEPH BARI 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 5/2008 3033 Timberwood Trail (3 yr. 1999) Eagan, MN 55121 2002) (3 yr. (3 yr. 2005) ibaril?iuno.com PHIL BELFIORI 2002 651-905-0293 (H) 5/2009 3671 Canary Way (1N• 2002) 763-287-7167 (W) (3 yr, 2003) ubeltiodOwsbena com Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr, 2006) . MARGO DANNER 2001 651/454-5688 (H) , 5/2007 2037 Flint Lane (3 yr. 2001) Eagan, MN 55122 (3 yr. 2004) mrsmaooo0usfamilv.net N. MARK FILIPI May, 1997 651-602-1725 (W) 5/2007 836 Overlook Place (3 yr. 1998) 651-687-9866 (H) Eagan, 55123 (3 yr. 2001) (3 yr. 2004) mark.tilioidmetc.state.mn.us LAURIE HALVERSON (Alternate) May, 2006 651-662-6291 (W) 5/2007 680 Brockton Circle (1 yr, 2006) Eagan, MN 55123 DUANE L. HANSEN May, 2004 952-894-9228 (W) 5/2008 3911 Denmark Ave (1 yr. 2004) 651-687-9566 (H) Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr. 2005) hand00@lcomcast.net MUHAMMED LODHI May, 2004 952-278-2629 (W) 5/2007 4361 Bear Path Trail . (3 yr. 2004) 651-686-5273 (H) Eagan, MN 55122 m Iodhifthotmail.com DOROTHY PETERSON 2000 651-454-6532 (H) 5/2009 4337. Sequoia Drive (3 yr. 2000) Eagan, MN 55122 (3 yr. 2003) norsk43379biuno.c om (3 yr, 2006) RICHARD PLETCHER 2001 651-687-9177 (H) 5/2008 1074 Northview Park (1 yr. 2001) (3 yr. 2002) nchard.ofetcher®usarc emh2.armv.mlI Eagan, MN 55123. (3 yr. 2005) RYAN ZIPF 2005 651-686-2958 (H) 5/2009 4721 Pebble Beach Way (1 yr. 2005) 651-281-1275 (W) Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr, 2006) rziofifbirrinc.ora Eagan City Staff E-Mail: isiohnson@cityofeagan.com cmesko@citvofeagan.com poison@cityofeagan.com ghove@cityofeagan.com emacbeth@cityofeaaan.com 2-13-06 Phone #651-675-5505 (Cherryl's # after 4:30 p.m.) Eagan Parks and Recreation Phone Number: 651-675-5500 Eagan Parks and Recreation Staff E-Mail Director full Seydell Johnson Jsiohnson@cityofeaaan.com Administration: Cherryl Mesko, Superintendent of Operations cmesko@cityofeagan.com Paul Olson, Superintendent of Parks yolson@cityofeagan.com Sonya Rippe, Recreation Facilities Manager srippe@cityofeagan.com Recreation Programs Mgr Paula Nowariak pnowariak@cioufeagan.com , Forestry: Gregg Hove yhove@ct oofeagan.com Water Resources: Eric Macbeth emacbeth@cityofeag an.com Recreation Staff. Cathy Bolduc cbolduc@cityofeagan.com Holly Champlin hchamplin@cityofea gan.com Colleen Callahan ccallahan@cityofeag an.com Municipal Campus Facilities: Mark Vaughan mvaughanC&cityofeagan.com Community Center: ___.SandyBreuer __ __ - - __ sbreuer@cityofeaaan.com TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION FROM: JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 16, 2006 Workshop scheduled in Conference Rooms 2 A & B 6:00 -- 7:00 p.m. CIP and Park/Trails Dedication Fee Discussion ITEM I: Call to order ITEM II: Approval of agenda ITEM III: Approval of minutes of May 15, 2006 ITEM IV. Visitors to be Heard Staff is not aware of any visitors who wish to address the Commission at this time. ITEM V: Director's Update Director Johnson will provide a brief overview of activities and events within the department. ITEM VI: Consent Agenda Staff has reviewed the Silver Pines and Eagan Hills Alliance Church proposals to ensure compliance with the parks dedication, trails dedication, water quality, wetlands and forestry issues. Background information is included in the packet. ITEM VII: Development Proposals Novus, a Manley commercial addition proposal is included in the packet for -------C-ommission-review of-parks dedication -trails dedication,-water quality - Wetlands-------- and forestry issues. ITEM VIII: Old Business Director Johnson will provide a brief overview of the consultant selection and general timeline for the completion of the Patrick Eagan Park Master Plan. ITEM IX: New Business The Commission annually reviews the proposed fee structure for facilities and services that are charged to the public. These fees are being reviewed now for recommendation and inclusion in the 2007 budget, which is currently underway. ITEM X: Water Resources Update Member Belfiori may wish to provide any new information pertaining to the Water Quality Management Plan update. ITEM XI: Other Business and Reports There have been no subcommittee meetings held since the May APrC meeting. ITEM XII: Round Table Any items of concern that might be placed on upcoming agendas or items of interest will be identified. ITEM XIII: Adjournment 2 JUNE 2006 DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS • STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY • The Do the Parks Passport is now available. Families can track their visits to the spotlighted parks in their passport. The passport also includes a return postcard that families can use to share their favorite memories of their summer park experiences. • Eagan Live Jive started on Wednesday, June 7 and continues on almost every Wednesday evening through August. The best part - they're free! • The Eagan Seniors will be hosting a bingo tent at the July 4 festival again this year. They plan to have bingo available from noon to 5 pm on Tuesday, July 4 on the grounds. • Approximately 10 youth took part in a round table held at the Oasis to discuss a design for the BMX track being installed adjacent to the skate park at Lexington-Diffley. • The installation of the sound system at the Central Park band shell is complete, initial reviews are very positive. • The Eagan Lioness have donated $1200 to acquire and install a bench at the new Central Park playground. • Crews from the Sentence to Service program constructed new tee boxes on the Northview disc golf course and also corrected a severe erosion problem. The course continues to be very heavily used. • The Eagan Skating School with the partnership of the Eagan Ice Crystals figure skating club presented the annual ice shows on May 6t'. There were over 400 visitors in attendance for each show. • The Civic Arena was sponsor to the Jose Cole Circus on May 18th. • Holz Farm Spring Festival was held on May 21 and was a huge success, with an impressive 590 participants in attendance. • SUPPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • The new electronic reader board sign has been installed on Pilot Knob adjacent to the Central Park Pavilion. The primary control will be from a computer terminal in the ECC. • The Civic Arena hosted the MN Valley Kennel Club regional dog show on May 13 and 14th. The show included 950 dogs on Saturday and over 850 dogs on Sunday. Parking was a challenge. PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES --_ : Thewarm -dry conditions-are-taking-atoll onturf,-even-at the-athletic-sites. igatiOfl -- - systems are being pushed to their maximum, while at the same time adhering to City wide odd/even watering requirements. • The Consultant hired to complete the Patrick Eagan Master Plan conducted a walk through of the site with staff on June 8th to become more familiar with some of the physical issues. The project appears to be well underway. • Routine long-term water quality monitoring program is underway. This year data is being collected from 19 lakes and ponds. • To clarify the water and to remove phosphorus from Central Park Pond, staff has applied alum to on two recent occasions. Regular monitoring of the pond will determine if applications of other chemicals are needed to control aquatic plant growth. • The interpretive sign at Moonshine Park is installed. It was given to the City by the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization. 3 • The City's annual plant harvesting program is underway. Work on Fish Lake was short- lived because there were fewer amounts of plants than estimated the week before. The equipment has been on Blackhawk Lake since early last week. Operations on Thomas Lake • are expected to start in early July. • PROMOTE HEALTH & WELLNESS • The installation of the new playground equipment at Central Park, near the band shell has been completed. Landscaping will be added to the perimeter within the next couple of weeks. • Work has begun on the installation of the new play equipment at Kettle Park as well as a new hockey rink at Carnelian. KUDOS TO STAFF: • To the Forestry and Park staff that have put in extra time to ensure the landscaping of the Captains Course is completed before the putting surface is installed. • To all full-time staff who have trained and oriented the summer seasonal staff in preparation for summer activities. • To all front counter staff that graciously accommodated the throngs of Cascade Bay season pass holders and families looking for activities for their children in the last two weeks. Summer has certainly begun! • 4 City of Eaali MEMO AGENDA ITEM: TO: PREPARED BY: VI; KENNEALY RIDGE APARTMENTS ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION Date: June 16, 2006 Agenda Item: VI-Kennealy Ridge Apartments Action X Information Attachments X 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Existing Conditions 3. Site Plan 4. Grading Plan 5. Erosion Control & SWMPP 6. Landscape Plan 7. Reforestation Plan 8. Tree Preservation Plan JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and wetlands issues that pertain to the Kennealy Ridge Apartments development. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Sunrise Properties is requesting approval of a Rezoning from Agriculture and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to PD (Planned Development) and a Preliminary Planned Development (Kennealy Ridge Apartments) for construction of an apartment building. The subject property consists of two unplatted parcels ate 2101 Wuthering Heights Road and one platted outlot adjacent to 2099 Silver Bell Road in the SE '/a of Section 18. A Variance is also proposed for setback of an existing building to proposed public right-of-way. The applicant is proposing development of a 4-story, 107 unit apartment building on the 5 acre . portion of the site. Access into the site is proposed via a new public street through the 1.7 acre outlot from Silver Bell Road. The existing building will be set back about 20 feet from the proposed new public street, resulting in the request for a setback variance. The site contains a singe-family home which was constructed in 1966. The single-family home has driveway access from Wuthering Heights Drive. The outlot is vacant. A heavily wooded ravine extends along the west edge of the 5.1 acre Ag parcel. The ravine has steep slopes with significant natural resource considerations, including tree preservation and impacts to downstream property. This ravine also is directly above the Minnesota River flats. PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION: This proposal would be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. TREE PRESERVATION: A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are one-hundred forty-three (143) significant trees in the inventory. Individual tree size and species break down is as follows: Species Avg Diameter Boxelder 18" Cottonwood 35" Conifer 30 feet hgt (Red Cedar, White Spruce, Pine) Diu. Range Count 12"-30" 55 12"-72" 40 14'-50' hgt 40 51 Percent of Total 38% 28% 28% The balance of the tree inventory is comprised of a variety of deciduous trees, including species such as silver maple, black cherry, ash, and willow trees averaging 20" in diameter. The development as proposed will result in the removal of ninety-seven (97) of the one-hundred • forty-three (143) significant trees (67.8 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single- phase, single-lot, multiple-unit residential) is set at 30% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal more than the allowable amount, there is a required tree mitigation of one hundred seventy-eight (178) Category B trees. The applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation Plan that indicates the installation of one-hundred- three Category B trees to partially fulfill tree mitigation requirements. The balance of the required tree mitigation is proposed to be fulfilled through a cash payment. This cash balance is calculated at $22,500.00. WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: This 5.1-acre development would be located in the northwest sector of the City, immediately adjacent to property of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, which operates the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant. The developer proposes to meet the City's water quality requirements by directing stormwater runoff to two treatment ponds, one on the parcel to be constructed and another next to the parcel to be expanded. Requirements for the volume of water quality treatment ponds are based on the imperviousness of proposed developments (i.e., the proportion of land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and walks). As proposed, stormwater treatment for this development exceeds the minimum total volume. • There are no wetlands associated with this parcel. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: 1. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 3. The applicant shall be required to fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of one hundred seventy-eight (178) Category B trees, and a cash payment of $22,500.00. 4. The applicant shall be required to protect the preserved tree's critical root zones through the placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of tl Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on- site. 5. The applicant shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 6. Two ponds should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff as proposed. The ponds should have dimensions acceptable to City standards. 0 Item: V1 Attachment: QI?m?RC?r\' ?lad' LOT 1 / BLOCK / e\ / ' A7A •????G??s 09,9 jz- s4 r. a 02'1131 ) ?\ I ! /P / / X\ " `\ LOCATION MAP `? ` .995401 > \`; ``? jy. A' KENNEAL Y RIDGE APARTMENTS a g City of Eagan Dakota County, Minnesota 5 s III \ ? \\ _? \i^ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 X64 ,I \ \ \ l J _ / ?\\\ \??? \\ //,/ ice/ 4 ?i ?< /'Y /? =6\ )100 / / / f: / INDEX ' • ' ----- \ L.- e4ri : •j / •? ? / - - - - ?c CI) C09TRSREE2'1PRELUM/NARY PUT sirs PLAN 1 R -----------_?e'- CS) MEAD/NC P"N CI) EROSION CONTROL ------------- I -? / / /.:=_ / / / T 2 cs) OTIL/Tr PLAN / / / / k 4• W.P24.'0?? \ • M1y5)' / / Cl) EA7s1YNC CONDmeNS C7) LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 O / n.!) REPORESrAOON PUN C7.2) COMPOSITE PUNTING PUN 45 ?, / / Ca) TREE PRISERYA7/ON PUN J / LEGAL DESCRIPTION : 54401: M-742 a 00294.07(0 9.9 S 59.9.. le. )32.9074 I9, R459 23. (001954 C925. 6v3219..19194w a 414.55 C2w309 4 .9014 2 0$ 60A0 1004G0110nw4L906994M!.5l U6042494 wWnn450100av.2 94444.010 La 0:44021104 eY 74(0414 M.40 0* 449.20042944424 La) 9 6417454 24 696 491 9010 9.54 •1743 500.9..01 .0..14454 2419x1 4492 95102 254 4.90 029(0... 0010454 24 223 9011 b 94 2941 902 24 a MLahnn a1g4~W 96 . *0.o. a45674i01...L 722.0 Wig4 0900g(0a90.9:9a 592401 443.454090.59».6110424 51.1041149492149400 a 6.V*23.9 104.00129615 544442 w 94174..150.949x9019 s 4400.44440 La ). 59919.19, )40409 2)-745923.0..710.0»100.2 Cams 042.001 2 40 54249 44 24 24150(0. aw041 7 44»1)6251 btl .W tl 00 604x44 07400 a 004 Gow•2w91a ).444044.,0 91/4 4 94 494 i. a 1.4 50.9,0,40 L9)9000..a10649b31e 010E 9daa5.9i.i5SN0tlb09 9»244004 9444 5.494 0944 50 0099» 96959..2411].6 4.14402 954 40 90 742219 40945. a 005 b.9. 4430 454 (074990 h94.».01094 24 .50121944441 29*2 60 0ga1. 6.94454 d x74.2 121 494 454 450 R 1.490.96 424941 50 5.500. 4.1,2 44 b . m X00 450 609 104440915 94+04 9010 S *..14b6 44.9 509x000015 50 019 9 94 102 a 994425: 2474.9 (0420 9.19.00 0249 9..00 5 4b9.e944 tl 74 20149 4.969 a b 424 44 e4 94. d 0999.+9 a 049 w 7463 24 4.601 444 454 16455 9 4m9.9.a09 2»2.23 b 490».0 d 474». 4 M 100 40420906 y.04.p »9 450 ea. M 6bv5 ow9442.4wao5aww4.w.4.5.r4amo0(0148 01,02.90.05522 44.40 a 04. 045o..91a4p d 2040 00444.4. La ).5.[44 11)0.449920.7459 23 44 0 9743 929.3240 x21.241.4 40 9245 M 0194944 051(5,0 500.9(0.1140019.2x134110009042444 00 954419000 a 451.45 24 94 9002 74 904.9 999 9.1044 900 5 x7011 M10ag19409s4» 2 0.4 2 42.4.4 91444 b s901aw.w4L »0 41019 5.909 9 (049 d •A14a 0. 47446040 44.04 045 40 407.914440.294.x0040022 a 909»45 a M .949 0.01490.95 d 104 0700 9/9421009 5. 494 0440 $ 04 914942 55 1 4005. 94.9.9. 6. ..15.1 0 0 • 4.5 00 4410 1914249 H0 1.552 5.74 1 5049444.. H 1901 420++5 M 04 002 a 9.V4u5 b h 740 a 015.2464. w M 74201 0_ fl C0144S 516 4 0b111144m402).e9400 099.490 » bows: C4n.455 7 9 • 7420 74 .4e 404 044 24 9.E 504mmM W. 602. )62.61 54 9 4 24,0 60 024 i ..1404 tl 540 124.4.00020005.4254 044 40 744414 10 S4.a24 0 04495020 101 ).6.4+50 01 626 491 644..254.950 let09950rc* 0(42.1 4 042.. 9x.990190ee0.»9iw4 x005 442 0414 25.7090 0049n.0.004vd s 0550915.15401 04401240092945049491.3 044-010: 0444 5040.4195 91 b.9 045.490 h . 60499 tl 4.2 431 94 25..5460 O.p9a 51140.0119(054 x06 ]) 4C 9443.9454 094 92 0.0 440449 9 18500510212494.040,00202.2 .41454.624+4 002 249099..5:444 202.2 ,040474.101 015445 0449 5.0122 024 x01010. 0450 910414.40. 1100 7400 a La t. e109 1. 55574.551 0074150. 74.70199 »4100. C74w40.v5 994 x41 .5.9,74 040. 24 220 9.2: 920. 004»1015 dory 4..44x4004644.24 20 19 1 9 404..24 x21 21 44 4 94 1469 24 299.45 a 10 995 * 5 x1049.4 44.. 234.99.9 .5.51 U 6007 9 4554,09.29(0944. 944594»442455001»1 49 9 90991254 01 0) 1 .a]20024N1.0005, 40lCe500 9M.056569Mpq.440e ,6•\ .41 (0414.x9 ..964 a 105.00 49 2e .92441 294 a 24 *4 0* 04 400» 02 960,05. 1014 10160»405 205 9 (0 109 950 151. 19210 00 w, Sa26104 a 120 l9 1; 1450. 100x411.05 494 60244411 .01444 d 10 l9 1: 044.439 ..44.944 b 94. 7412 a bq? IJ PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 50 0 w 100 150 Scale 1' - 50' I§ H!" € 41 O 3Ie Cl "ECEIVED JUN 0 2 2006 9it,i 'UM 'On Si r.6py1 '0 r+MM WYBi01 (ICY) °^! ILrae-e t i Y) mW ' .ice aw?lnuY6 con-cot (lYY) .wVd :.le Mn IIYI 'who] cuss I!1•^P,ac a11W q w0 W YYYZ O 'aff awed aww&w 077 U1.12 dudd fSIXNIIS g p .. .a.- .p. .?; ON/7703H xw n ?waar wie?wp . ,,.r. vw:.,n I.nRauw a.r , AMU SNOLLIQN09 ONbLSIYS •'tl°"'• ama.lm w mwdw S.f:NSIYItIYdY?H9j0IN .C/TI'/3NN?/!yxu ina Ra3$ ag?s?9 SEE aa'a "#P . ?E- ?' ?`? ! ?? $ a i Yy qqpp ?£S ag€E?^ 3sa av rC ? Ia?Lfi? ?£? ?Ba?c E`yg?PSti Sp tggeiffi ?}apg? pY ! ,g: S?1 ?Fa?P?y T 'I? ?" 68 n$ 6isa$B SC a3EE%.E fE 6 a LB}?ES a ! N - Q _?+ y Y' s; .d Ea ;fE Fs $? E? !g$g'3a6 dy _ 8 its gg aaE?nn aapEpP I 3 a s p6?L a C-i C v eEn?,ai 'lanRtEfl C? v 1 ?.+ ` y PEE Pg1.3 i Ey If n3= 3.€Pa$ GC R NA Z W r s°? f RaS;3 Ra 1f. Iil a 999 LLJ ,? € $g;fr a.° P'!apg fills REpn ?j a $ M$?•g O o p 3L y pafg =pa f ffid a C $ ?'R33E o all 31,1111. _? I ? x wg @. $l 11-M, fit apg ? F n a Z R mill S. . sS 1lafx saE9#al}?BE 1.xt ?R°E $ sas$F eP It/ Z_,*_,/41;11,r1 22. ell / a .. y. .. _. - 1-='c'am ;_f?T?-.. •R.. 1I `? Y /i ?'? `f?/ / l' // '/ I \ ? ^ - +T??, 4 w-cc , a t' / / pqO • p ,/ hJ% / ! 'alp 6 -- -r. zlr ?° ;:?: "y. q,1`? \` .. l ff ,,}y' ??ii+?'i?0,„Q?, - [l ) •?_ ?? •, S\ ^` \ .? a 1?,?' \ ,.••? x`- I "?o ,1t ob. cm O N N LU W N C et '0N .311 'NX P?^P•N •3 IPP+•tl nro :..me-Pq :?ws inn ?AAyry a i .PP 1e.o AuV'o 41 W W Ya'? *4 9 4 Q tZLi=-aMr (199) :.-s 01196 N11 '•1P1 '"0 •111111 "O ••N 041Pa PYSS X77 '18}jlad0Jd as tuns NY7d B.LIS S1NSN.WYdY SO(rIN d7Y&NN8 yy Q d. N and Kt th ?t Fn?o 4 it i "? ? R t. ?8iRRR8R AA sPAPA y AP AAP AAA lL% tw p 3^ 8i?_ V ?- s?8 AAtA31a/!S Awv3Mk1)o waxvns ONfl7o.9Hr 41 J/nor •.-..?. ,?v / , /? / / ??c / IXI c \' \ N 0 X P?n % `•1. L CL z ?6 \ 7 o I e t t W ) t \, ?w - AYw?-\---------- 'OniW,MYP N• ; R oN R ,o ..\\L\ \\ \. \\ \ C=D a N N O C=l w W ,gib, 9LS91 ,ON 7N 'NN PuOV-N •0 WF"S 9os9-S01 (1SS) -A 9[Z9-0 (tS9 +:aa y,n:wgs X "ft (199) CSC >..»va un-9 oz of Y'i wva 7 Wq i0 Ma SOOT C S .!/01.31WIS O,:CD 0 ?+?N 641Ptl .945 077 's°,yisd°sd OOaS z`7 ON%170W ? wa•+"'"< vaw o+ ?a"'"wn ww ?xw ww i NY7d 9NId6?lD '?+m macaw S.LNSNdtlYdY SOM f7VZNN",..- c t?fy/4,yy L y `° X o C4 y y< ?? <2 s N woo N o CL Z lei I ?> >?1t1 I. i I i ' • /.''^ ° fir, ? ?• ? '`; \ ? \ \ \ i i / ??• %,?. /;%."? / s°.? : ;' '' Vii/ / /\ ?/?' . ?\? ?/ / \`? ?:•:A?. \ 1 16, .. ..°r1 - - ';?+ \'?y - •c ? lei I I ? .I y? n I 30 - wss-ssr (ISO) ?P< x ?n 'nn P4NG•x uwWn _--? _ 't--s'Ftv?a??+ui "log 0400 x''.9007 O{ICa?xun '.xn xl•e •IHW _ a ?o v do ..H Wane .sac V. N"" •an}asK s? seuung l $ wnYwn I• •Pw •we '? 74 79A 077 W y ^nM•Y rpun rY6nJ pugw ny C•.iwNl ,fop I iWl > V F° Yryy.IMn 1 l Rw pun ° •w <IerM w $ yt0 ^?'"?. .Yew . vxl•xlwr xP .M In" Z Ra+y I dddllS/708.LN0? NOBOaIP C .xor?u :,,,? 6su.suum SdN.HR,L21idY 9QIY d7Y.i1N."Ix N gill >-- ;115 1: °f8?? ZC ?' C ¢yap g gW g h11 ?", \ Std s iC a C ?' U??gs G33? '? o AMU C,3 1E 1811 111! 1 3_1 a; 1` ` .?+ o 8 ;JJjjJ !11! wIjJ!h1JI!!1I( ?ds NEs z d albi ;111:1 g. N a$ s egg R o ` V :1 ti ? +1 a ? N ? :? ? ? a ? < ? I i N11 - -.\\- .? -• _ / / /, sae %?•` i , < : I' / i __ -.y< - .. 'r`te: ?• ` ` _\ \. ?\ ., / •? y = '7-__-__ I I 1 I Item: VS Attachment: S+2 ?-? ?hk? 1 ms ERn16YPASC Derv[ ST.PAUI.MNrmo.sn. PNdslul.>eo FAxlys ma.w L .'°'° •w v.510. U..ry1. YlsionoGe Lighting c..!.. om. A rrAnc aaf Ise 1a 3.6. ev Photometric Studyf "'ya sa. ^^^ 'as 1.1 ".v MA051506TSRI Slver Pines Aporimenls TSR Lighting ire rauw. ws. Aw u.. Dole: 05/15/06 cws1. w.,w..e. r. s? 1ss SUNRISE PROPERTIES LLC KENNEALY RIDGE APARTMENTS EAGAN, MN. crrv RESUBMF TAL 5131!06 SITE LIGHTING PLAN h-w bbl.. aTY RFSUSMRTAL W31N8 b.b.bi. 1673106057 ..? Ss. 0i0 Oddh 81.00 A1.2 J RECEIVED JUN n 2 20 E 1 03 y Z X ?1 Q rue-au WS) -A .uro?{a cYnY7 33f33333333333 iiiiiiiiiii tt?rr?c§?qp?? ....,,.....,.... :la$dddA rsar?12 :... 1 fill 9 s 1? t J..j I it 111#:1 ? luat`sHZ:atr,Yt s361'e4Haa?H ?gkk lift 6 IaHp QU F Wa az ji '.1 HH,; it z:%, f, - Irr /?, // I II// _J\\ \ \ / _ ,I y F 1 I / 19:1 I r / Sq I II?,'? \ ? r r it - \ rill I\ 1\ r? I I I \ J? _-` y i I I Ir I I V 1 / i ! U, j \ ? ~? r rlr? ? I )? r r ? t. I -IIJ -1-`l i n j I / I Ca O O N c 'J a W LU Item: V I Attachment: Reoc'es+a-lion kt ! I I 1 jI I i 1 \\ it Al- IYENNE4LV RID GE I APARTMENTS City of Eagan Dakota county, Minnesota CONSDL ? f :%.% 1 II \ 1 x e?:?ay \\ \+ r 1 i 't / \111\?? 1\ 11\ oC 2`?\ \ I/// \ 1 1 / / \ / • Vii. ?! ?i "il ? i! i 1? 1'/ , '% - ll 111111 fll 1 \1 I I /II ,h1 !l! 1 111 , / \I \ I 1 -4 111 l 1? \ l t' I I I I I I ? ? ? ; I 1 I i I I C I 1. 11???'1; 1? I I I 11 ' I I I .i/Sa?y?% ! - I\ 1 i EXIST1116 aulypl?la ``\\\I\ I I I 1 \ / Ar qr ' b*V. _I r..IYa A.w.r Ma N...w rwr .rr r.yarPw..r.rrr r_ ?Qavri.mi? .s= _- / ? N,rN?a .e xANN.. N!NA r?- / I 1 YflSCB@. nca.- • Nle HANNN Wa 1 ? 1?v N®IMN x¢ xANNa NN.A PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Scale 1• 50• \ \ PLANT UST.. R./a..latbn T- -'?s•'? eq ' \`- .. N.. xT .m,.n ..K NN NN..xx NxR `` \ Tao xsa>x `, • `\ Awl. may. r-r .r ? ' I r. .. RED. Na 2lai DA I 1 yr- 1 N+ hS ? \ 1 r 'ikc \\ /' o Lr' 7? 1 J V Blog Aja-l I C7.f I RECEIVED JUN 0 22006 • • Item: V 3 • Attachment:''\ c-e- W,eN"On plan KENNE .4LYR/DGE APARTMENTS City of Eagan ' 1 i•;=; ' A' : ?,?\..\?? \ \ Dakota County, Minnesota •a: ? \ ?\ \ TREE JNVENTORY ". . ra \ LIJ 72 N, • -' '. ,I' kJ ) i )?Y`^\ ,d \\\ 1. \\`n \\ 1 /'1- M1::tea \\ ••'•I? -S \ \ \ I I -- - ry[?. ?D?3 IF's 01 p9 • / ?oa' ) , )d \ ...---111--- I /? . \\\1 ? \ ?'? l::': / / / _ - - -? ? - % ,.?'` ' \\ Fr,•? :^e/!j(?•s l 1 ',??-v L-?/ -- - - . ? l J .?> o. `J 1 r / \ I \ 1 - ', ? \ , !. y 4?,? Kra 1. / / .••? / \© ?/ ''? \ \ '^\' g 1,?_ ?Yd T ' '/' / ',? ?\\ ?`??C ?A\ \ ??I? : i ti i'\fV?r-) ,. . , / r \?:.: ?- , f``*? `l??<:, 9a'/ ?; '• -?\ V• , -? ,x ; .._.._....-_..._? J [ -.jib a , ? HIV ` ? ?.. „ ti?• \?•?, \ , r .'% ,) r I _ ?? V / / .- Lac6 w: Eat =!3^a _ i I - •+?•a ?. - ? i , \/1 / : / / ... _.. cxsac ca+mn `• . /• r•' • ;' % / ?•• , • ` x 920.8 Ee77Ha Mi R[SAT • _ .............. ; . i / n .x ? 4M.? y e ?^. ?a D.. „ - - ? - _ ) -- --- sas _ - °- , • o9s aa ,PEE UK 97 / ---' - / / " -s9-ss- E mn I Z p a • 1 ? l Ir # F I -- / f ,j ns / sur,.. st.u ----- / it i. :t `S_7' Ewa ,` 8 I a x I" '' , ....... -.?- gF-'- _ si-BT- Ensn9a Sta9w mm 7t 2 PRELIMINARY ? I L---------------------J 9 I ,? ?? ?; ',9 M / / / / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION / ' ' ? ?Ye / I -pa w o m rao ,s9 \ / / / / / S , Scole 1• = 50' 51/06 v#?,f1??`?ix yi. s..`1a`•? RECEIVED JUN 0 2 2006 Location Map /-9A Eagan Boundary N Right-of-way Parcel Area Park Area Building Footprint Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided N q [fin by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of April 2005. City of L pnajas THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. City of Evan MEMO Date: June 16, 2006 Agenda Item: VI-B; Eagan Hills Alliance Church Action x Information Attachments X 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Existing Conditions 3. Future Expansion AGENDA ITEM: VI-B; EAGAN HILLS ALLIANCE CHURCH TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and wetlands issues that pertain to the Eagan Hills Alliance Church development. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Eagan Hills Alliance Church is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision of 10.26 acres to create two lots upon property located at 670 and 700 Diffley Road. Eagan Hills Alliance Church is purchasing land from Praise Lutheran Church in anticipation of future expansion. The subdivision is necessary to allow the land transfer. PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION: As applicable, this proposal would be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. TREE PRESERVATION: WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: This proposed subdivision was previously associated with Sunset 12th Addition and Praise. Lutheran Church 2nd Addition. City water quality requirements were met through cash dedication in 1994 for the portion platted as Praise Lutheran Church 2nd Addition. Water quality requirements have not been met for the remaining 3.8 acres of Lot 1, Block 1, Sunset 12th Addition. In lieu of water quality ponding, a cash dedication is appropriate for this portion of the e % velopment. There are no wetlands issues or concerns. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: 1. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication as applicable. 2. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication as applicable. 3. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash dedication in lieu of on-site water quality ponding. tip' AUGUSTA CT. - - - - xW M'a•w 25618 .?• i i 'Y + , Y 2 ? . 2 r ? ?O w a - r / i or x Hm ? _ •Y r; ?: , 8 agv • ry u rn9f mfn? ' b^: I ------ I _ -?_----- a ROAD DODD - _ Q mNe ..? ^x)i STIRRUP _ ?-i3eos___ h A4t STREET _s__ ' ---aa fec t ?'3 y ERR9 s - . s s l Ia?s w ? s I Orf I .•xor11 se .-, -y-------- - - - ?-?W wr u+c h P « I .. ? S ?; s I - I y ?N3 C +'aR :; I Nom'n ---------------- I *T? I 0? ! 3 t ;O IL/ t 71'? Z _jZ?j >s v COYERSBEST PREMMINARY PLIT I NEDLUND Zoar Buie ARtanee Church x oaw o a'arm+c sw?rrew 1 (?is+)u'w?s-e!m ("I)isx x E fly OZ N ZC -o c? i aYM S .rs33i p ?S? c xa fan 8 r w ____?-?_, '- .•?•.,' /?I%?i///rp l'!I-•r? jw' TP NI,? q; _ oR;,liD,ii NI'i!I1;?, t'.•'aYfii, - _ - ??\x\ i/ =? .5 _ ?s, 111 I:I It Rl%,- \v ?,..\?A? •----- -? _ AT/CUS?i4?CF !);Y//rii?3a???i'?__ _ I \ _ IIII r A 11 / /S 5 ;? 3 - l !'II!?;?A -\?? - - - -?--I'-? I\?•..?+ f•!?,?/' /? ' , I`\v. .?.)1.1' r?,I?illl- ?? %\_ 11121 ,r 21 `\I /? ?? •? r - Y ),'?-__ ? :•: / .? 11 'Y 11111,"il? ?? I - \ '/ i is1 ?1-tl J •P• / _ ill A '' \ r / cz___ Ta r- 1^-t -- c 1!':1.115 - I 4 ' \?If `1 '•, 1\\?,I 11 III ... ? •-- I '- I- \ 1 '? r l L `\'` J \-TI I T•I \ i lilll\? -4J - ---r- • _- ?_ _ '?-- - 14111 .,, , / -• , / -1- \? 1 i1 Wmr. imeS 8 ` / 111.1' / r%' / I --? I ''IS Y Z I rg \I 'N _ -?2 gyn/r//!1I ,IY , I$ I -----'I $ i i i` 1 ?\ I e°;I I r 1!111 ' I ! r y ;II L _ ,? \ Ill i ?1 5\ \y I 1?:]iI Jill i? I I _ { t rl / as'_- _oo- /, f? J` I,I -.? II II; i• --I - _ s°==a--_==_---_-_-- - .-- - - ROAD Cal j- Or- to A(? , .50 , art eL TES-i15G CONDITIGNS PLAN I:p I Ewan I NIL, AU{a+we Chureh 900 x , R6 6aq_, MN 55113 Ph-w: (45,) 452-3415 Aw1n4RP 44d. LC- a C CD C p I j I - I { ?J7 I ;i rc1 / IM, AUGUSTA CT. I I 74 -s?- I - - - - - - - - . A )X, M e \ I __ STIRRUP STREET _ ?` e x e h - - ------------ 1{ A A II1 II ul If e A I1 ,I ...... ------- • I r -- 1 I I M I I 1°sj 11 `e - - --------------------------- - -- J --------- 11 A ? A r 1 -- ! A ..< Je l o y a A Cj A ?.. 4 y y A y QQ iii ro I q ? ? y I ----------------- ? 1r--' iii h 1 i n y c•-^ 11 u y 1 `-- it _ ? --{;,{ i S nl 1 ----,? r h _ --- -------' ROAD -- ---- - ------ DODD I b! 14 go yz nM CD `,# Ei .. ,..., ?b IIj x i 7liltT r$ ffge' ; O .? 0 t t c? fcea:E t m 1 ""6 SAO" HILLS CHURCH /ST ADDITION SITE PLATY E, DL UND ar ..., . ?y u....r n.lr.r n.y... +w. m. k..r r.erir..LL j V Iv I Eva- NW. AUAanoe Churah ru/M6w ontrenafa' st6rlemc I I., /? y^ i (65119 1603 P (6i0'.r!!OD^° ee? furl NL66M P-6o6 C. 116bM 161 1!G It Mn -suolsslWO Jo s4oaaa ¦o; alglsuods.J sou ;u.uyedoa iu.wdope.B duunwwoo oae pue uol;euuo;ul slq;;o ICoewnooe oq; eo;uejen6 you op cuno0 c;ome0 pue ue6e3;o 413 agl M AINO 3Sfl 33N3H3d3H VOA 03GN31NI SI dVW SIHi UJ JO 1113 'Soot fljdy;o se;ueuno sl pue SIJ;o aolso lpunoo eioia0 dq 'F J N papMad eiep dew eseq l5QJed &,g molAay ISMS Bulsn peJedeJd dept' 90-VO-LO-Sd-S9 :'ON ase3 uoisInipgns /Geu!w!IeId :uo!;ea!Iddy g3Jny3 a=e1.11d s11IH ue6e3 :uedo,eAapfuawdoIeAaa lewd OOOZ 0001 0 OOOI m City of Evan MEMO AGENDA ITEM: TO: PREPARED BY: VII-A; NOVUS-MANLEY COMMERCIAL ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION Date: June 16, 2006 Agenda Item: VII-A; Novus-Manley Commercial Action X Information Attachments X 1. Location Map 2. Existing Conditions 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Site Plan 5. Grading Plan 6. Tree Preservation 7. Tree Replacement 8. Overall Landscape Plan 9. Wetland Replacemt. App. 10. WTEP Findings JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION IITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and wetlands issues that pertain to the Novus - Manley Commercial Inc. development. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Manley Commercial Inc. is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create two lots and one outlot and a Preliminary Planned Development for a school (grades 7-12) and offices upon 26.9 acres. Also requested is approval of a Final Planned Development for the school. The subject property consists of an outlot on O'Neil Drive south of 1-494 and west of Argenta Trail in the NE 1/4 of Section 1. A 2.35-acre portion of the subject site is located in Inver Grove Heights and will require separate action by the Inver Grove Heights city council for development and plat approval. The applicant is proposing development of a 90,000 sq. ft. private school, grades 7-12, and associated athletic fields on the eastern portion of the site. Future development of three multi-story office buildings totaling approximately 190,000 sq. ft. with structured parking is proposed on the western portion of the site. A north-south public street is proposed from O'Neil --we extending to a temporary a sac -'at the outhem boundary-of he site. The site is vacant with rolling topography, scattered wooded areas and several wetlands. The property is currently zoned PD, Planned Development and is guided for O/S, Office/Service uses in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. A 40-foot gas line easement extends along the west side of the property, and the developer anticipates relocating the gas line to within the new right-of-way. Except for the small portion located in IGH, the subject site is located within the 1985 Laukka-Beck Eagan Planned Development that incorporated approximately 450 acres in northeast Eagan. This Planned Development called for the establishment of office/retail, office retail/showroom, and research and development uses throughout the site. 0, In February 2004, the City received an application for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on this site from O/S, Office/Service to MD, Medium Density residential (4-12 units/acre). No action was taken by the City on the proposal, and the applicant withdrew the application in May 2004. A land use study subsequently undertaken by the City resulted in a conclusion by the study group that the current O/S, Office/Service land use designation was appropriate for this site. PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION: This proposal would be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. TREE PRESERVATION: A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are two-hundred thirty- seven (237) significant trees and thirty-two thousand nine-hundred fourteen (32,914) square feet (.76 acres) of significant woodlands in the inventory. Individual tree size and species break down is as follows: Individual Trees Species Avg Diameter Dia. Range Count Percent of Total Oak 16" 6"-48" 79 33% Maple 15" 7"-22" 52 22% Cottonwood 14" 7"-20" 40 17% The balance of the significant individual tree inventory is comprised of a variety of deciduous trees, including species such as elm, poplar, and apple; and a few conifer trees such as pine and cedar trees. Significant Woodlands The significant woodlands on this site is comprised mostly of smaller diameter (4"-12") deciduous trees such as elm, boxelder, black cherry, and oak trees. The development as proposed will result in the removal of one-hundred fifty-three (153) of the two-hundred thirty-seven (237) significant trees (65 % of the total), and in the removal of all of the significant woodlands, thirty-two thousand nine-hundred fourteen (32,914) square feet. According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple-lot, commercial) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees and significant woodlands. With a proposed removal more than the allowable amount, there is a required tree mitigation of one hundred eighty-one (181) Category B trees. The applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation Plan that indicates the installation of two- hundred-two (202) Category B trees to fulfill tree mitigation requirements. 9 WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: Water Ouality This proposed 26.9-acre subdivision is located in the extreme northeast corner of the City. Any stormwater runoff from the site would drain west toward the Minnesota River. Because of the size of the parcel, this project is subject to City water quality requirements. The developer proposes to meet water quality requirements through innovative stormwater management practices including rain gardens, underground storage (wet vaults), and underground infiltration pipes. No stormwater treatment basins are proposed. All stormwater from these practices would be routed to created (replacement) wetlands and then to existing high quality wetlands. There is no specific stormwater management information provided for approximately half of the site ("Outlet A" - commercial development portion). Wetland Delineation Report The wetland delineation report for the project site (Graham Environmental Services, Inc.; Project No. 2005.090) identifies five wetlands that are subject to the City's jurisdiction, according to Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Rules (Ch. 8420). The developer's consultant evaluated the boundaries and characteristics of the wetlands using widely accepted methods. Any proposals to impact these wetlands by draining, filling, or excavating need to meet all provisions of WCA Rules. Wetland Ecological Assessments In Fall, 2005, as part of the ongoing process to update Eagan's water quality management plan (WQMP), City consultants conducted ecological assessments of the wetlands using standard (MNIRAM) approaches. These assessments indicate wetlands "A" and "B" to be of high ecological quality. Because neither of these wetlands is connected to the City's stormwater drainage system, they are among the highest quality observed by City staff. The assessments indicate wetlands "C," "D," and "E" to be of low ecological quality. Preliminary wetland management classifications being developed in the WQMP update process indicate wetlands "A" and B" would receive the highest level of protection. Approaches for this management classification may include: 1) avoidance of any impacts without demonstration of significant benefit; widths of 50 feet and average buffer widths of 75 feet; 3) 25-foot no-grade zone around wetlands; and 4) 25-foot structure setback from outer buffer edge. The other three wetlands would be protected similarly to what is provided by WCA Rules. The developer is proposing to protect wetlands "A" and "B" consistent with the approaches indicated above. Furthermore, a conservation easement is proposed for the area surrounding wetlands "A" and "B." l4. Wetland Exemption Request MN Rules Ch. 8420.0122 Subp. 5 allows draining, filling, excavating of wetlands created solely from actions that resulted in unintentional ("incidental") wetlands. The developer has requested the City to exempt it from replacement standards, permitting 8,602-ft2 wetland "E" to be filled entirely. Historical evidence indicates wetland "E" was formed by construction of O'Neil Drive. Wetland Replacement Plan Application The developer proposes to fill 20,460 square feet of the wetland (2,550-ft wetland "C" in entirety and 17,910-ft2 wetland "D" in entirety) and to replace this impact onsite by creating 28,254 ft2 of new wetland and by claiming 116,159 ft2 of public value credit for establishment of native grass upland habitat surrounding existing and created wetlands. The proposed amounts of replacement exceed the minimum 2:1 standards of the WCA Rules. Plan Evaluation Because of the complexity of the issues associated with this proposed development, the City initiated a review by its Wetlands Technical Evaluation Panel (WTEP). MN Rules 8420.0240 provides for such a process to make technical findings and recommendations. The WTEP is comprised of staff from the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, and the City of Eagan. According to the Rules, when the WTEP makes a recommendation, the City must consider it in its approval or denial of a proposed replacement plan. In summary, the WTEP does not recommend approval of the wetland replacement plan application and provides the following findings and recommendations*: • Wetland delineation is acceptable and exemption request to Basin E applicable. • Basin A and B are high quality wetlands and reliable and exemplary avoidance and minimization protection is expected. • There is inadequate information to ensure compliance with the WCA because stormwater issues have not been fully identified for the entire site and the eventual future cumulative impact on wetlands cannot be quantified without this information. • Additional wetland replacement acres than required by the WCA do not automatically compensate for unknown secondary and cumulative impacts associated with stormwater management and potential volume increases that may change existing characteristic and desirable vegetation. • Use of Low Impact Development (LID) strategies to reduce impervious surfaces, include bioretention and surface infiltration, and use of excess stormwater for site irrigation should be evaluated instead of underground vaults and infiltrating underground pipes. • Information is needed on who will determine and from where soils will be taken to top-dress created wetlands. • A long-term means of protection for the native upland grass and created wetlands needs to be identified and processed. *NOTE: Last-minute emergency medical leave of the BWSR representative on the WTEP prohibited his signature to be on the attached Findings of Fact document. l/ ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: 1. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 3. The applicant shall be required to fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of one hundred eighty-one (181) Category B trees. 4. The applicant shall be required to protect the preserved tree's critical root zones through the placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site. 5. The applicant shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre- construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 6. The wetland delineation report should be formally accepted as submitted. 7. The incidental wetland exemption request should be granted. 8. High quality wetlands "A" and "B" shall be protected according to the following provisions, all of which are proposed by the developer: a. avoidance of any impacts without demonstration of significant public benefit; b. minimum natural vegetation buffer width of 50 feet and average buffer width of 75 feet; c. 25-foot no-grade zone around wetlands; d. 25-foot structure setback from outer buffer edge, and e. a conservation easement for the surrounding area. 9. Approval of the wetland replacement plan application shall be suspended until additional technical information is received about overall site stormwater management issues and specific replacement wetlands construction strategies. /? , Q- c1 Eagan Boundary Right-of-way Parcel Area Park Area Building Footprint ' i? '-=' `J II t I I Site o y,? q o ? 1- CD>:p dlPa ® 04 • Q ' a ° P fTC?T'l s 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer.. Manley Commercial Addition Application: Preliminary PD, Preliminary Subd., Final PD Case No.: 01-PD-03-05-06, 01-PS-10-05-06, and 01-FD-05-05-06 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVlew 3.1. Parcel base map data provided N City ? t] c] by Dakota County Office of GIS and Is Current as of AprIl 2005. Ctof Ea all THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. Location Map Item: v 11- A z3 E)uS-4;f Gcl&-t a Attachment: 5 nZMammw? ; .... a, afy .Logan n?? E a } b b .... . .ro x., a m,r ... e. ? ..? " _ roa•w....aro.n ...r p aw.x aawe,r aw. ro.a...ux... a..r a. i Y ............. vi PRELIM AAY teT FOR U nuuwumm suwrtu b"r v, aoos NOVU 4 EAGAN. MN LAMFORM amnw:mmwn. otwam" C1.1 o OWS ADDITION a b ?,. .......,,.? ?. ?Ri 1 7 , yP P- ,06- 5 -207 ? ' , i i ? ? ? ......,.a:..............,,,.,...... ;3'? -?.-tea,.- _ _ _ d 1 ,. .? ??" \\?\ 19 ?4 £ OUTLOT A ry v \ \ \ \ 11 II \ ? ?< ? '?< \ \\ a ? 111 ll // // ` // ? `` \ \b ? I \ \ \ 1 \ \\ m Ill // \ \ \\\\\ 1 I LOT I \\ ?\ \ I 11 1 \ ? \\ II jll !I 1 I \ ` ?: • III ( I ' . ? ? ? u w. i Mg JIM I I I is E I y PARCEL2 Ifl cmYarawvc I11 1 I LI--.ad6PS9°,b'.'i4e.v.<` >' •? L_a..e.s.n__________________JII II Item:V 11 •- A ORIMM.NO Attachment: P c d f P r--(? + :-?::... wu?;aolo?au.aoueaxr ZONOIOAMO lETM? BMHOAIID M?ffi+R II iJ L_ 10 IMATO :.rte-.=r PFOAROM \ r"? ..'.. murrnungnaEwr•ru. ___ MAY_17. 2M.. L ivovus M11-11-311 P4. MN LANDFORM IMP" A-M-19F, r -. ' $CALE IN PEEL .....-- MMUMR. C5.1 7 in . . P! r Ul Z t' ,,e?? pp IN 6:e €. h 1 It, ! zwl .01 gill 1 11 o J/I 0 0 ? 166 ?I I Q r?+ tl ..1 9 11 fI LI I.I _ fl O ' i ? JI 'c?L? , £ Qf E g! ' ! P- ia R E V i U `? t 3 ' 6 eti3 ::oa3r: s ? , 5 yyF s i•£ yyy ' l 3 fill i YSi 5 fil : E sYy p tE S4AAA6 F ? ::x a I :s: l s p : x 'S? eti ' {4Y ? 77 f yE d f Ell g. t I P?' i ti Y ffl 3 { p•! E !j , ? / 9}}9!gg€?gt eTy t Sp'pEg ?. qqt?q? E 3Fiet? i 75tt i£i£Y5! ° $ 6 YYS 4 €E9 E t {pp{pp S €F3 F ae 5 yy yy ! 5 iEf f yy i E I E i its iF 4 r== e p4=' a fq' ipg: F t Pt? $3? ! 4, b '? t°trig? a iii 3 e ,Aa 4???i a? ? g i Tag 81 C I $' 3 c Q 3 ft ?Y! i d p}gg Y § I'll 'n? g5 g Y1fx3S m°. i-11 ¦ Y Y?i. ai t 7 7 ri S i $ $ y'$ Saji . ;I F 4ef t ra '{47$;{ s E {x {?if3 ill { ! yP t` t ;a{q$ 1$ tY{T A 3i ,tt F {..{s{ ? t4e{ l9,4 's•.y$3 $ 4 t$ € nt 3 :a {!$ a{@.3¦ : : Phi. a flE It ' ai`ipt ai i 9 s• 3• s ] t ?{9a •$S SYtt'?$t pg 7 a !$3?Y`y 3?t9 e i,{a; kpEfl?$tBfl! ?g1#y! 4-,4-t !'t {+7§,Syt ni ?•? f! ?• $,4 : ?' x ? 4 t• i Yy 4 {97 1! Y _¦ t(3Y ?} d 2 _ P C a 6 ?' ?E13tt i x$!g SyF{` 3 F. o a f 4 {C 9.. 6 1, ¢ {3 a {? fl { • f ' ?3°.YS Y eya3g ?,.4= 1f{ {{: 5 t E 3_3.6 a_. `.. IN {9 ?" --m tp?j! ie/ $e t6 s gg 5 9pB n? 7Yte n 3 fl ¢ }? @11, £YS;? S9?Ei !#l€?3 75S{ s"id3lfl7 0 [7 ! {[ g§i tt 9f1 t4{3 Y{4 pit pi at ? ??- 3 !i f ?t!I ' fi x ilj X01' ° 3 S $ oa f! .1° zu _ .r J`i' f 3r i Bp ! t yyp, as ,° y. 1J nR - - - I I.{Pj 3 I \ ti s f ?= w 41 o It E A ? ? G ' LL? y w Z Y 1 1 ? r ? Is Y ? ^ (?l Ql.L-&'4 J3S d -?- 1.i i .il .. • k ire} , A N I z i i•a? : ? j I^. . \ 1 / ., C't \ `=cam T N-)VUS -- - LAC. iAN l?.tN LANDFORM ?rrntna 'n¢evvcBS31 .amnmxruw L2.3 nr•Ar.r rv re:rr ?- T3 C d S- J .) al -y r YBP S 7 ?•r 3 gg "Y}3 ,1 €II H iI a § iH: i ' 4ii r,es fiyf °id9i1?4 ,y d & d ? 4 Q?Y# I?I? j ? g Gl id ? $ 4 g ielSitH at'Ei at€?d?iYP its r ifiljlifi Ii ! . / il iliaiiill i,#i ill h #, ?rIJ 1i ti` iii t U I I ,t !h 1 S I z ! 't i?1t aI j'! ! ! ! o illy! 9 ? .--, a ! f! #' ' # ! i ,I I! i 1t =dul=` i ?i t II !f'1 + .'? rt it' d ! ! , I ! ! ; + ! d ' ; } E1??, d A # ' of it li !!, ii'= it+d _ ? 1 III II!!1t # ? I li i i iliiflgil ! H 1 t4. I.II ii # 1 P !' i l' . ! t 1 t ,i :! i' 111fl??'"°'i 1' 1 is i t,I s}I P 1 _! i I?' ! i 1 1 ij i t , ri d11f : ?' i ' I 11 fl 1 ! 1 i ! ! i i ; ' # (i iq" { I , a : H Ii ili i ti'f f. ?, ! t i 4'I i ' s!'!. ! 'f 'f 11 I if I,t as Ri ti# i , !, i P+lPili,i 1 Iiilltl # ii! li 3 !# i! :ail t Ilhot ' i!'f Iqi ! Ifii? hi $ i if nt•1! f =' 1f 6 ti!' 1 t'1t3 +3 iP I It i ! I d !iQ n1i f i i t i ',t i°• = a pi if , ' i !{ f i St! ! 1 I 1 ' I if I ! i 3t 'ii it tii ' I =! If ! ,,1r I's] It fi it ;if.i 1I IIfIii.'1 inl3°.s I,. I1111 liilRif I;PH.ifill ! l,trii i 11 i'I i1i Ii Tait , II' iseis! , , iti}'! a: a ui li t ti itl! !! i f 1d d f ii i d; s,1 udi 1 ??l? i1 fii ! #' it ii AID! l,; !, a 1 1 1! t _ !; fi _ ! I ! , f •; 1+ I # ?' , i t ' dH#I 1= Q iHl.! 'i tt a s, , , Q ' i # hi Q !i i ' d of '1! d? ;f ; ! 1 !1 itf a' 4i1' ! i if 1, 111' ! 1 HIQi i1 i' if Hi ''i 11 ' tiR6+ ,1 1 211, fi d # I' ti it •' ?+ I q llli t i i ! tQ!i QIt iii 'i 'i ' '" }` "t it Q ?'' t. if ` ' 1 1llit r' k111. I sI i' + f '•is If P P.?H P H , '' I ! " 11 tt+, i , H j , i ! ; t!i efi it i, •I# fl• ,f • t i ' i 4' ! ti; 1+ !? QH' : °.N i If ii i s s I „ I= d^ '? , '!_ d i d != iP t 1 ' l t l i!a , I i', i'11 a IN Ili If it if Pill let 1' lll ! ! ,, 1 rt I i i? ii{,ti !I? ii, f! r i' ! ,'t i! ! I1#, , •i ,1 „# ,1 t i ' Itf If R i ,^,iI1'l3h E =1 t!!d !t+ III i s:+ 1 ti 1, lii! steQ,lttilfilddiii#, i 13! '' 4'_ !'' eiEHE [ P4 PI t I, P. S S S Y ! t! 1• • t = Pat ali ' If ! I B i i ! I i #f d t 31 1' t l 11111 it t i i I 1 ii,i I # ,f 1 i 1 ti,ls. ii , ifsi i #i?i = i+ nQ ! . II iti Q } i'Ii it il !I If H.!?? .?, 'i` Boll f !li R 1 ! ilat' its H.rj f •i' 1 i i } et i,I if of , I ii ( 1+'; ''1 d 1 • •,. ?... a t , f; •: • . , r• 1 - , 1 t1•-•••- ! 1' ' i d ! Hills 'i t I l + t !ii ii fl if 'Id1 !;# I d1" ' ,11 f l 1. s'tr I 1 it H' it I! I P ,!, 111 i tr 111 i' 1i ii t l t 1 1 ! i i 4' I 1 u,? h!, d i i=1 i i ' !i • = i3 i , f i! i• ii ,• G r fl # ! ?' 1 f ! 4= i, E i I i 1!? i ?! 1 t'114fi fii !(, di ;! tl ! 1#i# i i ?1'!' l'I 'Q r flit' 11 # I ! ! f I'° I• it i' ! i } ' Ii'it ! 1 ' I !{ 11 'it i 1 k '' i• ti d ,=d , f!1 d' t d p= 4'{ d'! I•f 11 4 !?? .i .s ; ' 'i 1 } 1 , P I@ !i :' =1 t d i.ni it 141 ! I i!' ' ! ifl l t'' .I If d H;i :d isi' i4i 1ti 't ii •!idii !t#tii ? I! f ! ¢d if Qlii If f ;i i ISM i! j ti i ,ifll! i ?i 1 ! . 4!? s! Pi I 1 filf? i = S 9iis = ii. !is 4 I f fd it . ii!11 li3 i!li S = . i E! i,Q,S 1 '7iil i f '' ; °t' i r iii ' H!i•is}. '''i e • ! M '? I t !,ii , i , sri i 4' d =t1' I f# 1 # 'f # , '1 li li'a # t {It? f i1 ( , • ?=H i #{ n I!f ,il i, FS ! i # #,I +it if: f ' !#i#? t• i1 1 ' 1' ??? t ,' i iliii? i • , q + f a t ! d d . ` ' d 4 ' ' 14 i'i,'• iii It fl i ui`i Pf, i ? I Ii i . s1 I!t^ i•I . 't # ?i + ii di II ' itf + • ?''h ?) d fi't tI'ij it 41111 114'1 ,! ii•f P f : f' f 4' s 1 i'' 11+ i jt ,IjIl 1 #t ii # s i, 1.7 ii 1 If = +lHi; If 'i 4 s 1• i f b !i4 •, t t i# i 1' i• i' _! 1's'H i d i i I} f+,li s di liIl t j f 1 ia+ ,i!1 , it•, / 1=#Slf P = If ! d ?, fii i€ii d,d di I., la. )tt i+ i f , ti,, i? d ?d1f f # fd i! r i' d1? t fl 11. ?f i d,?, • t P 13 ! fl d i h i? i ?1# ' ' , tft,,; ! ° # 1 end , , i, Iii , # ti!i !!;ii , # a {1t ii '111 # 114{1! f 'I ' ' 1 Ldi ( + # ! 1. I dill 1' I} s. r, i Iii i ! r, 1 ! t 1 ! ' I = ! i!•, tt tt I 1' 4 IiN i it i i=i i?4 1! i = ? ? ? ti! 4 i 4!ii ,I.•?i a??,. if#g 11 i ? i ! = fi'i 41'!' ? # i iR if 1•'I#iii !1it?iti? Plot] i= ' li'!i 1 Nint' ii'i 'd Il• t•il fls t f 1 1 41.1 i I 1 tat , • tf ,1.I 11.1 ! i li 1 } d('4 i 1 jai 1 iiil?! 14!d! iili iii _t it i tfli i1HP ! ti If ti li 1i: d' i Qt Ifiit 1 ! i H'ii It tIi titi if i itsfi ild ilidtiY iII, i 1171 , .11, i 5143 f ,! t s1,1 i i< i!; iid I , ud# i I: i 1 idi.'i1' HS}I- t 11 i. # 1iIQ °'•i. #- ii #lidiidif i s I , 1 s I I I 1 , i, 1- Phi J G FF ?,J Q I t !? F 2 lids Q g n: I y HE i SAW. 0 im t r ?Ik Ix ? _ got 1 h F 4 3 yf • r / A •F \ L . ?y,?`? ?f 4 t 6 .. I :: - ,' f ' ivy\? >n` {?_.} '?r?? `e'ry"r f r. ( ? Tu \ ? f r \? r WI 1 Item:Vl -A Attachment: + " • NA-026620.038 (V.2.02 for MS WORD) 1Q29/04 Minnesota Local/State/Federal A lication Form for WaterM/etland Projects For Internal Use Only Application No. Field Office Code Date Initial ication Received Date initial Application Deemed Complete PART I: BASIC APPLICATION "Sec HELP" directs you to important additional Information and assistance in Instructions, Page 1. 1. LANDOWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION (SeeNe/p 1) Name Tom Doffing, Manley Commercial Dev. Phone: 651289 5529 Complete mailing Wpm- 1915 Plaza Drive, Eagan, MN 55122 lA. AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Help L!) (Only if applicable; as agent is not required) Names Graham Environmental Services. Inc. Phone: 715 778 5730 Complete mailing address: S1095 Westland Drive, Spring Valley, WI 54787 2. NAME, TYPE AND SIZE OF PUBLIC WATERS or WETLANDS IMPACTED (Attach Additional PhVect Area sheets ifneeded) Name or I.D. # of Watery Impacted (if applicable; if known): unnamed (Check all that apply): []Lake []River MWWetland type ® 1 Q IL ® 2 3 04 []S 06 07 08 Indicate size of entire lake or wetland (check one): Less than 10 acres (indicate size ) ? 10 to 40 acres Q Greater than 40 saes 3. PROJECT LOCATION (Information can be found on property tar statemepl, property title or title insurance): Project street address: Fire #: City (if applicable): Eagan Y. Section: NE Section:1 Township #: 27 Range #: 23 County Dakota Lot #: Bloelc outlot N Subdivision: lone Oak Watershed (name or #) Attach a simple site locator map. If needed, include on the map written directions to the site from a known location or landmark, and provide distances from known locations. Label the sheet SITE LOCATOR AMAP. a-yza" pw- 4. TYPE OF PROJECT: Descnbe the type of proposed work. Attach TYPE OF PRWECT sheet if needed. S Commercial use of the site will result In impacts to 8.602 SF of Incidental wetland (exempt) and 20,460 SF of Type I and 2 wetlands. 5. PROJECT PURPOSE, DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: Describe what you plan to do and why it is needed, how you plan to construct the project with dimensions (length, width, depth), area of impact, and when you propose to construct the project This lerite most important part of your application. See HELPS before completing this section; see What To include on Plans (Instructions, page 1). Attach PR OJECTDESCRIPTIONsheet. see attached narrative Footprint of project: acres or 20,460 square feet drained, filled or excavated. 6. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that would avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands or waters? List at least TWO additional alternatives to your project in Section 5 that avoid wetlands (one of which may be "no build" or "do nothing'), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. Attach PR O ECTALTERWATIVESsheet if needed. sea attached narrative 7. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that impact more than 10,000 square feed of water or wetlands, list the complete mailing addresses of adjacent property owners on an attached separate sheet. (See HELP 7) 8. PORTION OF WORK COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work In wetland or water area already completed? Q Yes No. If ___------._.- _-_yes,..dascribetbeeompletedworkonasoparato.shcetofpapeclabdet-yVORKALRILADXCQMPL&TEII -(Sea-FIELI'8)---- ----.----------- 9. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: List any other permits, r tviews or approvals related to this proposed project that ate either pending or have already been approved or denied on a separate attached sheet. See HELP 9. 10. 1 am applying for state and local authorizatlon to conduct the work deacnbed in this application. lam familiar with the information contained in this application. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part I is true, complete, and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant Signature ofapplica nt (Landowner) Date Signature of agent (tfappl ) Date This block must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed aerially and bas the necessary properly rights to do so. If only the Agent has signed. please attach a separate sheet signed by the landowner, giving necessary auffiorizetionto the Agent. • Mitneada LocadStatdFedeasl Application Forms for WatedWetland Projects Page I tae panne cornea for sus mn enonor 1000100101101 111 Branum to average to now, pactespmise. ammugn to nagony or appuemoaa moan requoe ? eu,aa a ea , a6 mcmoea die time br reviewing instrtctimt, searching existing data toutces, gathering and maintak g try data needed, and completing and reviewing the eollectba of iefotmation Sead comments regarding ibis busdee esttamte or any other aspect of I1is calteetim of information, inctudieg suggestions for reducing tots burden, to DepstmeatofDakme. Wuhisgsoa Headquasurs Service Directorate of Information Operatics aid Repoas 1215 iefRnos Davis highway, suite 1200. Arlington, VA 22202.4302; and to the Of5oe of IdamgenkW sad Budget Paptsworh ReducdoaPmjeet (0710.0003A Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any oust provision of law, no param shalt be subject to nay penalty for !bating to comply with a eolteetitat of infwmstion If It does not displays currently valid OMB e?om??eo? location Please DO NOT RETURN your Sicn to either of share addresses. Completed applicatlom amt be submitted to the District engineer haft jurlsdigim over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: AWhotities: Riven and fbtbots Act. Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act Section 404.33 USC 1344; Nbs®e Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act. 33 USC 1413. Secion103. Principal purpose lofurusation provided an this fain will be used in evaluating the application fora permit Rmtiw a on This ttbnnathm way be shared with the Department of hatter and other Fodent state. and local gnvenmeat agencies Su>mdaeion of requested information is votuasry, bowovm If infoouwtima is not ereyidet the mink mslicatkn canna be mhuted nor on a permit be sauced 1TRMS 1 THROUGH 4 TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CORPS 1. APPLICATION NO. F 2. FIELD OFFICECODE 1 3. DATE RECEIVED { 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED I YOU 00 NOT NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 6-10 and 12-25 in the SHADED AREAS. if Aft applicants must complete non-shaded item15 and 26. If an agent is used, also comptcuc items 8 and 1 L. This optional Federal fora is valid for use only when included as Dart of this entire state application packet 5. APPLICANT'S NAME Manley Commerial Development - ---26: Application is-badly -fete a passiit-or pefmits-to-authorize the work-desca?bed4rt-this application Ire+ Ufy theinfamatwnia-thi>~------- application is complete and acauate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work desatbed herein or am acing as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. -IJ?d6 .yJc, 03 Signa4+m of applicant Date igaatute o agent cif asy) Date The application nmtbo signed by the person who desires to wadertake the proposed activity (applicant), or it my be signet by a duly authorized agar if the atatemead in Block 11 has bear filled out and signed, 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 pevida time Whoever, in a try manner within tthe juriedictioa of any demmsent or agency of the United States knowingly and wllifxily falsifies, conceals, or cave,, up with any trick, sehe me. or disguise a material fad or makes any fake, fictitious or fraudileot sfatemearts orrcpresearatimu or makes oruses any false writing or document knowing same to oonrain any Slap, fcatious or 5audulent statements or eahy, shall be fined not more than $10,000 orimprisoned rot more dun five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent CECW-OR) Minnesota LrcallState/Fcdetal Application Poems for Water!Wctland Projects Page 2 IL STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION (jfappAoebk: eoatpk le only fansJiortmrgan agent) I hereby authorize (Mariam Environmental Services, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agumt In the psocts>dng ofthis application )R LGU USE ONLY: Determination for Part 1: ? No WCA Jurisdiction ? Exempt: No. _ (per MN Rule 8420.0122) ? No Loss: _ (A,B,...G. per MN Rule 8420.0220) ? Replacement required - applicant must complete Part II COMPLETE THE SECTION BELOW ONLY IF REPLACEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED: Application is (check one): ? Approved ?Approved with conditions (conditions attached) Comments/Findings: LGU official signature L/GUr Name and Title For Agricultural and Drainage exemptions (MN Rule 8420.0122 Subps. 1 and 2B), LGU has received proof of recording of restrictions (per MN Rule 8420.0115): County where recorded Date Document # assigned by recorder LGUofcial signature ? Denied Date Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Page 3 PART 11: REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT For assistance in completing Part 11, contact your Local Government Unit or a professional consultant . DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland impact; 2) If your project has more an one wetland impact, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labeling "first impact" and "second impact" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area; 5) If you do not have access to some of this information, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy chart for inure impacts, ifneeded) DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Wetland impact (as noted on overhead view) Watershed name or number (if known) County, Section, Township, Range Wetland type' Predominant vegetation in Impacted wetland area Size of area impacted (in acres or square feet) Existing land use In project area (check all that apply) 20 Dakota 1 Reed canary 2550 ? Housing Mississippi Sec.1 T27 grass ? Commercial First Metro R23 ------------------ ------------------ --------------- ? Industrial Impact ? Parksirecreation areas ? Highways and ------------------- ------------------ --------------- associated rights-of-way ? Forested ? Farmsteads/agricultural ® Vacant lands ? Public and semi-public 20 Dakota Sec.1 2 Reed canary 17910 ( s/gov't facilities) Mississippi T27 R23 grass ? Airports Second Metro ------------------ ----------------- ---------- Extractive (gravel impact pitsiquarries) ------------------- ------------------ -------------- ? Other: 'if you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type with that impact area. TOTALS OF AREA(S) IMPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE ON CHART (indicate acres [] or square feet ®) Type: 1: 2550 IL: 2:17910 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: R: 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply to either the impact site(s) or the replacement site(s)? ? Yes ® No (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, or waste disposal site.) If YES, list and describe briefly. 13. SHORELAND IMPACT ZONE: Please identify each wetland impact site noted in Section 15 that is within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet ofa river. none Minnesota Local/State/federal Application Forms for WaterlWetland Projects Page 4 14. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: Indicate how proposed replacement will be accomplished (check only one box below and continue as indicated): ? A. Wetland banking only Complete Application for Withdrawal of Welland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us Skip to Section 19, page 6 (You do not need to complete Sections 15-18). ® B. Project-specific replacement only Continue with Section 15 below. ? C. A Combination of wetland banking and project-specific replacement Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us Continue with Section 15 below. 15. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S) CONSTRUCTION (Complete this section only if you marked Box B or Box C In Section 14 above): Describe in detail how replacement wetland(s) will be constructed. If several methods will be used, describe each method. Details should include the following: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored by tile break, restored by ditch block or revegetated); 2) type, size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks or key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosions or site degradation; 5) proposed timetable for starting and ending the project; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Write this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. see attached narrative 16. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project-specific replacement (Box B or Box C in Section 14 above), will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ? Yes ® No. If yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us 17. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland replacement site; 2) If your project has more that one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labeling "first replacement site" and "second replacement site" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given replacement site, use the first dotted line(s) and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type in a given replacement site, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify type(s) of replacement credits and "restored or created" for each separate wetland type with that replacement site; 5) If you do not have access to some of the information, or if you do not know your replacement ratio, call your LGU or SWCD office for ssistance. Photocopy char/for more wetland replacements, if'needed.) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS Identify Watershed County Section, Wetland Type(s) of replacement credits Restored Wetland name or Township, Typet (in acres or square feet) or replacement site number (if known) Range New Wetland Public Value created? Indicate (as noted on Credits (NWC) Credits (PVC) R or C overhead view) Name of #20 Dakota Sec.1 T27 2/3 18,123 C First Mississippi R23 ----- -- ----------------------- ------------------------ --- replacement Metro - --- 116,159 ---------- ------•--- R and C ------------ site ----------- ------ ------------ Name of /320 Dakota Sec. 1 T27 2/3 10,131 C Second Mississippi R23 ----- -- --------------------- ----------------------- ------------ replacement Metro site --------- -------------------- - -------------------•- -------------- 'Circular 39 wetland types: Indicatel, IL, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. 8. R, or U. If you are 28,254 116,159 identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first TOTAL NWC TOTAL PVC dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate REQUIRED REPLACEMENT RATIO: each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area. (If known) 2:1 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Page 5 18. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT (Required only if yon marked Box B or Box C in Section 14): For projects involving at least some project-specific replacement, include the following additional information ® Two drawings to scale of the replacement wetland. Include both overhead view and profile (side view or cross-sectional view). See What to Include on Plans (instructions, Page 3) for a detailed description of what should be included in these drawings. Without drawings, your application will be considered Incomplete. ® For created replacement wetlands, include additional soils information (if available) that indicates the capability of the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics. Note 1: For replacement wetlands located on pipeline easements, you need to receive endorsement of your project from both the easement holder and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's Office of Pipeline Safety. Before start of oonstmction, the owner of any utilities must be notified. The landowner or contractor is responsible for giving this notice by calling "Gopher State One-Call" at 652-454-0002 (Twin Cities Metro Area) or 1-800-252-1166 (all other locations). Note 2: For extensive or complex projects supplementary information may be requested at a later dated from one or more of the responding agencies. Such information may include (but not be limited to) the following: topographic map, water table map, soil borings, depth soundings, aerial photographs, environmental assessment and/or engineering reports. 19. SIGNED AFFIRMATION: FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANKING ONLY. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part 11 is true, complete and accurate; and I affirm that the wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING EITHER PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT ONLY OR A COMBINATION OF WETLAND BANKING AND PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT: Part A. The replacement wetland. I affirm that the replacement wetland was not: Previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit; AND Drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years; AND Restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs; AND Restored using private funds, other than landowner funds, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration; and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement Part B: Additional assurances (check all that apply)* ® The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland ? An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performance bond, or other acceptable security has been provided to guarantee successful completion of the wetland replacement. ? The wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank Part C. For projects involving any project-specific replacement: Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s) will be located; and I will at the same time submit proof of such recording to the LOU. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in part n is true, complete and accurate; and I affirm all statements in Part A and C, as well as checked assurance(s) in Part . • 0 .',,L l.D b b a 6 Signature or applicant or agent Date FOR LGU USE ONLY Replacement plan is (check one): ( Approved []Approved with conditions (conditions attached) ? Denied LGU official signature Date LGU has receive evidence of title and proof of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland: County where recorded Date Document # assigned by recorder LGU oJfcial signature Date Minnesota L.ocatlStatelFederal Application Forays for Water/Wetland Projects Page 6 Nag __J 7177 y r 1, ,} f L J.f F Project Location SurwrahU*Oil j' 1 „ + 1 park 1aew? - - f' 73 Irmw DM H x? 3 l , buu daksl A N Not to Scale Figure 1. Site Location Map 11%G E Manley Commercial Site S Eagan/Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota Graham Enmraratnental Service, Inc. GES Project No. 2006.029 it d asP 3 ?U? €{t I l t ? it ? i?8 ? 1 a Y x G a B h ...,t i 5 4F. Id! y'1 -I € I rj I 4 I I `i 6t r.. a I£ . F .. € S4 } 3 5 ? ? I f ? t 7 5 £? 7 8 y? ? x ?9# 5 3 ? )i 11 S 3 ? , I iF 3 1' S3 1 t< { 1€ e 33 p .5 t 4 5 W [ 4 7 €Y A ff I' y I i ? d ll2 5 ? t 3r k§ { 1 .?: i ? 4 t.1?: Z t S 3 5 3 G f? !?} tt£ .' ] •, S' ? r41= 7 } kr$ F4 5 3 €1 t y ; F 1 y3 ; t5. A 5 sy.-y s S(..;) s9 r t: d h? e a 7Y £ F Fi iF'S.t G 4 x 4 i € q £ 4e fC !?' e f 3 2 i = f s ? 4 f 3 c : x 5, y E e ! a Y £ 1 3 x , 5 g 3 331c . c: 1 ? ! i .. E ES C ?3€ . t 1 Y! i. £ 4 i } ] t 5_ { k y? 1? i £.l • '! 5 . t t i..F • }F £ is ` c 3 'S F? 7 f £3i+ " y 3 £ 3 Ye_ t.. jlF[ [ !g t } ti o f F 4 yF S 1 01 , a y} 5 j. o } tk D )i 2 S,: .<e 3.a. f'>1 3 O I F .F5 Y .<_,4 ?t%<3 i, I? Et U1 z ' ;tz V p i;l d3i yy IOC 01 fit , F 'r f L ii 41 1 I ?. r ep! ggd ss: 3 efA t' 5 s vt - f.'.., = ?' A y g . a e 5 ? ? i 4 ? 3 ? y E i IN ¦ I .. I` N 'kE?k.j?? a ? ?IS s a 4 6I Ek 2?M Ckk- e3s; I '` _? 9 O ! Imo/ Ire 'GI p i 8 a Z 1 G? s t . II i 3 fill all F: I U S yi f1 t? ?d s+• ?e S1095 Westland Drive Spring Valley, W154767 Phone: 715-778-5730 / 888-279-2070 Fax: 715-778-5867 / 888-279-2069 Wetland Replacement Plan Application Addendum to the May 16, 2006 Application Wetland Conservation Act Manley Commercial Site Eagan, Minnesota Applicant: Manley Commercial Development May 31, 2006 Introduction and Background The Manley Commercial Site project is located in NE 1/4 Section 1, T27N, R23W, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota (Figure 1). A small part of the site extends in to the City of Inver Grove Heights, but no wetlands or mitigation areas are located on that part of the site. The project site is west of Argenta Trail and south of O'Neil Road. The site and the surrounding area to the south and east consist of rural residential, wooded and agricultural land use. Commercial development has occurred to the west of the site. Residential development has occurred north of 1-494. A wetland delineation for this site was conducted by Graham Environmental Services, Inc. on June 23, 2005. The delineation report dated February 21, 2006 is included in Appendix A. The Manley Commercial project includes the development of a private school with associated athletic fields, commercial office buildings, internal streets, storm water ponding and preservation of high quality wetlands and woodlands along with the wetland mitigation area on 26.91 acres. On-Site Wetland Five wetlands were delineated on the site. According to the delineation report, dominant vegetation in the wetlands is reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Wetlands A and B also have significant populations of sedges (Carex spp.) rushes (Juncus spp.) lesser duckweed (Lemna minor) and broad-leaved arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia). Wetlands C and D are almost exclusively dominated by reed canary grass. Wetland E is located along the right of way for O'Neil Road. An incidental wetland exemption has been requested for Wetla E under a separate application at the request of the City. Wetland Replacement Plan Manley Commercial Site GES Project No. 2006.029 March 31, 2006 Page 2 of 6 Project Need and Purpose The project consists of a private school with associated athletic fields, commercial office buildings, and a large area of natural preservation containing high quality wetlands and woodlands. The proposed plans include a 90,000 square-foot private high-school, Trinity School (grades 7-12), the associated infrastructure, 1 full-sized high school-level soccer field, and additional athletic training fields and facilities. Trinity School is currently located in the City of Bloomington, and is looking forward to additional building space, and athletic fields to fill their growing needs. The proposed plan includes future multi-story office buildings along the west side of the site adjacent to commercial development on adjacent properties. The proposed plan also includes a public street to provide access to serve future development of the site(s) to the south. Nearly one-third of the site is preserved as a natural area as an amenity of the community and learning area for the school. Proposed Impacts The proposed school facilities and commercial buildings avoided all of the wetlands except the exempt incidental Wetland E. I n order to provide safe access to the site and the property to the south, Wetlands C and D will be impacted by the proposed public street (Site Plan Sheets). The total non- exempt wetland impacts are 20,460 square-feet or 0.47 acres. Sequencing Per WCA 8420.0520 Subp.3.C (1) "The applicant shall provide the local government unit with documentation describing at least two alternatives in addition to the proposed project to avoid wetland impacts." The alternatives provided in this application include a project "no-build" alternative, a public road "no-build" alternative and an alternative site design. Avoidance The "no-build" alternative for the project would avoid wetland impacts. However, if wetlands are avoided under this no-build scenario the basic project purpose cannot be met, and open space is not the type of land use desired by the City for this parcel of land. This alternative vetoes the development of 25.4 acres of upland for the preservation of 0.47 acres of Type 1 and 2 reed canary grass wetlands. These arguments renders the project no-build alternative for the project impracticable. A "no-build" alternative for the public road which causes the proposed wetland impacts would allow the site to be developed largely as proposed, but would result in inadequate and unsafe private access roads to the commercial sites and Wetland Replacement Plan Manley Commercial Site GES Project No. 2006.029 March 31, 2006 Page 3 of 6 no access for future development of the property to the south. This alternative would be contrary to the City's goals for adequate road improvements to serve this site and the property to the south which are based on reasonable requirements for public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, we would not expect the City to accept this alternative as a feasible or prudent choice over the proposed project based on the standards in WCA 8420.0548 C (2). Alternative Sites Alternative sites for the proposed project were not explored in depth since this site will accomplish the project purpose with minimal impact to wetland as far as size and quality. Further, this site is 26.9 acres with only 1.5 acres of wetlands. Requiring an alternative site in order to avoid minor wetland impacts would not be a reasonable alternative to the careful and prudent planning of this site which not only achieves the project goals and the City's goals, but preserves nearly one-third of the site as a diverse natural area. Alternative Site Designs Alternative site designs were considered in an attempt to avoid all wetland impacts. The most feasible, yet inadequate, alternative site design would push the road to the west edge of the site (Alternative Site Design Sketch). The following problems make this alternative not feasible and imprudent. • In order to avoid the wetlands and provide sufficient parking close to the school building the location of the building had to be shifted to the south. This in turn shifts the athletic facilities to the east where there is insufficient space to accommodate a full-size high school soccer field. Requiring the development or rental of an off-site facility for home games defeats one of the basic purposes of the project which relocates the school to accommodate its growing need for academic and athletic facilities. This alternative_would alsorequire_reducing the_buffer-areas aro_und_the__ wetland to the minimum requirements in order to maximize the usable space. Where as the proposed project exceeds the exceeds the 75 foot average buffer requirement and complies with the Cities proposed 25 foot no-grade zone. • Site grading for this alternative design would require a retaining wall around Wetland D in order to avoid the wetland and its buffer area. This retaining wall would be as high as 14 feet. Although this area would be avoided, it would be ecologically isolated from the rest of the site. Wetland D would also loose all of it contributing watershed which would threaten it long term sustainability. Although adequate fencing along the retaining wall would be provided, a wall of this height adjacent to a school could create tempting but dangerous conditions for the adolescent students. Wetland Replacement Plan Manley Commercial Site GES Project No. 2006.029 March 31, 2006 Page 4 of 6 This alternative plan makes it nearly impossible to share parking facilities between the School and the commercial areas due to the distance between parking and buildings. The synergy between the two site uses was a shared project goal by the City, Trinity School/People of Praise and Manley Commercial Development, this goal cannot be achieved. This alternative plan requires reducing the amount of commercial office space from 300,000 SF to 135,000 SF. This would likely be further reduced to about 75,000 SF because of insufficient parking and possible setbacks or wetland buffer compliance issues for the south office building. The 75% reduction in office space is a missed opportunity to use the property for its highest and best use which would be consistent with the City's planning and zoning goals for the site. In this alternative the linear feet of public roadway increases from 1150 lineal feet in the proposed site design to 1350 lineal feet Since the density of the site is reduced, the cost of the public infrastructure on a per unit basis increases. Additionally, the extent of the private roadways needed to service the facilities increases from 900 lineal feet to 1500 lineal feet as a result of this alternative layout. This represents an approximate increase in the road costs of 40% for the project This increase in infrastructure does not provide corresponding benefits such as easier access to the facilities, convenient parking or more efficient traffic flow. Impact Minimization Impacts to Wetlands C and D can not be minimized by changes to the site design while maintaining their integrity. The proposed site plan does minimize the long term impacts to the remaining wetlands and provides for their sustainability within an eight acre natural area. Most of the contributing watershed for Wetlands A and B will remain undisturbed. The buffer around the wetlands will exceed the -75_foot_average buffer_requirer_rment_andthe.-proposed plan _will comply with the City's proposed standard of a 25 foot no-grade zone. Rectification of Impact No temporary wetland impacts are proposed which could be rectified after project completion. Reduction or Elimination of Impacts Over Time A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and a Grading, Drainage aril Erosion Control Plan have been developed by the project engineer which will reduce the impacts to the wetlands through erosion control and water quality treatment measures. Replacement of Unavoidable Impacts Wetland Replacement Plan Manley Commercial Site GES Project No. 2006.029 March 31, 2006 Page 5 of 6 The unavoidable wetland impact of 0.47 acres will be replaced through the implementation of the on-site compensatory mitigation plan outlined below. Compensatory Mitigation Plan The Wetland Conservation Act requires replacement of drained or filled wetlands at a minimum ratio of 2:1. This equates to a total mitigation requirement for the Manley Commercial project of 40,920 square feet (0.94 acres). New Wetland Credit (NWC) of 28,254 square feet (0.65 acres) is being generated by the applicant in two basins adjacent to the existing high quality wetlands. In addition, the area around the mitigation basins disturbed by grading will be restored as native grassland to complement woodlands and wetlands in the nature preservation area (8 acres). The uplands around the mitigation basins and the high quality wetlands will create 116,159 square feet (2.67 acres) of upland buffer Public Value Credits (PVC). The mitigation site is on the project site, thereby replacing the wetland fill areas as close to the impact sites as possible. The north wetland mitigation area measures 18,123 square feet (0.42 acre) and the south wetland mitigation area measures 10,131 square feet (0.23 acres). Both basins would be created by shallow excavation in the upland adjacent to Wetlands A and B. The bottom elevation of this mitigation basin would be approximately 872'. This mitigation area is within an area mapped primarily as Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer complex (see Figure 6 in the delineation report - Appendix A) but will be excavated to the level of the adjacent wetlands in the Quam silt loam soil map unit The mitigation area will be cut one foot below the desired final grade and then backfilled with one foot of topsoil for a suitable seed bed. The wetland mitigation basins and the disturbed upland buffers will be revegetated according to the Vegetation Management Plan (Appendix C). The area proposed for NWC will be seeded with BWSR seed mix W-2 and the disturbed areas of the upland buffer will be seeded with BWSR seed mix U-1. Treated stormwater from the site will be directed to the wetland mitigation basins to supply hydrology. The wetland boundary of the mitigation basin is expected to be established at approximately the 873' elevation which is the proposed overflow elevation to the natural wetlands. The mitigation area is currently dominated by smooth brome grass (Bromus inermis), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and reed canary grass. The plan proposed should produce a saturated to seasonally flooded palustrine emergent wetland (Type 2/3). Monitoring Wetland Replacement Plan Manley Commercial Site GES Project No. 2006.029 March 31, 2006 Page 6 of 6 The mitigation monitoring requirements outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act will be followed. These requirements (per Minn. Rule 8420.0620) are as follows: 1) Description of the project location, size, current wetland type (Cowardin classification), and desired wetland type (goal). 2) A comparison of the as-built specifications versus the design specifications (first annual monitoring report only) and a rationale for significant changes. 3) Hydrology measurements: seasonal water level elevations or areal coverage measurements during the period April through October. 4) A map of plant communities within the boundaries of the replacement site, including hydrologic indicators observed. 5) Color photographs of the project area taken any time during the growing season. Annual mitigation monitoring reports will be submitted to the City of Eagan as required in its WCA approval and to the Corps of Engineers if necessary. Other permits, reviews, or approvals related to the project may include the following : • Final Plat Approval • Preliminary Planned Development Approval • Preliminary Subdivision Approval • Final Planned Development Approval • NPDES Permit • MnDOT Access Permit • Grading Permit • MnDOT Grading Permit • Building Permit • Met Council SAC Permit • City of Inver Grove Heights - Zoning Amendment and Interim Use Permit Approximate Transect Location A N Not to Scale Figure 3. 2000 Aerial Photograph G E Laukka-Beck Site S Eagan/Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota Graham Environmental Services, Inc. GES Project No. 2005.090 JUN-14-2006 14:32 DAKOTA COUNTY SWCD A "A-ZA I" V A ; , . L % T . 1 1%/j. 1._%_.L Item: V 11- TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL (TEP) FINDiINGS OF FACT Attachment: Lit EP Fic-tSn latt : June 13.2006 LGU: City of Eagan ouaty: Dakota LGU Contact Eric Macbeth (651) 675-5300 roj0ct Nahie/#: Manley Commercial Addition (App, # 06060204) Location of Project: 27 N 23 W NE 1/. 1 Eagan Dak Township, Rangc, Section, Qtr. Section. Lot/Block, City, County TEP Members (and others) who reviewed project: (Cheek if viewed pmject sits) ( ) SWCD: Brian Watson ( ).BWSR: Les Lemni (X) LGU: ? Eric Macbeth ( ) DNR: NIA Others Prelent: N/A TEPrequested by: City of Eagan 1. Type If TEP determination requested: X Delineation X Exemption Determination No-Loss Determination x Replacement Plan 2. ;Descriition of wetland with proposed impact: a. Wet'and Type (Circular 39) Type 1(seasonally flooded basin) Type 2 (wet meadow) ii. Sizd' of Proposed Impact (tenths of acre) 0.47 acre Ir 20.460 square feet 3. Have sequencing requirements been addressed? ` Yes _ No X Undetermined Unknown until applicant quantifies overall stormwater impacts to wetlands. Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district plan, the metropolitan surface water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance? X_ Yes _ No - Undetermined The project will affect the following wetland functions: Unknown until applicant quantifies overall stormwater impacts to wetlands. Functions Impact No Impact I rove Flood Prater Storage Nutrient Assimilation Groundwater Recharge Low $ow Augmentation Shoreland Anchoring Wildlife Habitat Fisheries Habitat Rare Ppant/Animal Habitat Commiercial Uses 6. For rj lacement plan or no-loss determinations, arc wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level? Yes No X Undetermined Unknown until applicant quantifies overall stormwater impacts to wetlands. 7. Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend approval of the activity proposed in item t.? Yes No (X) If no, 4hy? See attached comments SIGN 9 URES (if TEP decision is nor a consensus, note with an as k and ex I ' n [he back of this page) NIA SWCD Rep native (Date) BWSR Representative (Date) LG csentati(Date) DNR Representative (Date) Drafted by Br J, Waswn, Dakota SWCD JUN-14-2006 14:33 DAKOTA COUNTY SWCD P.03 • Additional wetland replacement acres than required by the WCA do not automatically compensate for unknown secondary and cumulative impacts associated with stormwater management and potential volume increases that may change existing characteristic and desirable vegetation. • Use of Low Impact Development (LID) strategies to reduce impervious surfaces, include bioretention and surface infiltration, and use of excess stormwater for site irrigation should be evaluated instead of underground vaults and infiltrating underground pipes. • Information is needed on who will determine and from where soils will be taken to top-dress created wetlands. • A long-term means of protection for the native upland grass and created wetlands needs to be identified and processed. Drdited by ian Watson. DalWttt SWCD TOTAL P.03 City of Eqdn MEMO AGENDA ITEM: IX-A; 2007 FEES AND CHARGES TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION Date: June 16, 2006 Agenda Item: IX-A; 2007 Fees and Charges Action X Information Attachments X 1. 2007 proposed fee schedule PREPARED BY: JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION j ITEM OVERVIEW: Consideration of 2007 fees and charges. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The APrC is asked to annually review the fees charged for private use of park facilities and recreation equipment. Based on a recommendation by the APrC, the City Council will establish the fees to be charged during fiscal year 2007. An increase of 10% from 2003 to 2004 was the last time a fee increase was proposed and approved. Sample surveys of other communities have been conducted in the past to verify that Eagan's fee structure was comparable even with the wide diversity of facilities compared. While providing rental facilities and amenities to the community is a valuable service, the city is also mindful of the need for a certain level of cost recovery for services. DISCUSSION During the review and discussion of the 2007 fees and charges staff suggests the consideration of a 5% overall increase in all fees. This would offset inflationary increases that have occurred since the last increase in 2004. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: 1. Recommend to the City Council approval of the 2007 fee schedule which reflects a 5% increase in all fees. 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of the 2007 fee schedule as amended. 3. Other. 81 2007 FEE - 2HEDULE Item: 1X-A Parks and Recreation Charges Attachment: pj?ied The following facility rental fees are subject to 6.5% State sales tax, and require a $150.00 damage deposit payable at the time of registration. Sales tax is included in the proposed 2007 fees. Eagan based school organizations that have a Joint Powers Agreement with the City may schedule use of Eagan Park Shelters and Pavilions free of charge (damage deposit is required). 2003 2004 , 2005 & 2006 2007 PROPOSED FACILITY NON NON NON RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT Trapp Farm, Thomas Lake, Blackhawk and Central Park Pavilions: • All day rental (10 am -10 pm) $1.1.'• .15 $165.08 $ 128.00 $ 176.00 $134.00 $185.00 • Half-day rental (10 am- 4 pm, or 5 pm -10 pm) 79.88 117-15 85.00 122.00 90.00 128.00 • Blackhawk kitchen use 37.28 42.60 43.00 48.00 45.00 50.00 Enclosed park Shelter Buildings: • All day rental (10 am-10 pm) $11'17. 15 $165.08 128.00 176.00 134.00 185.00 • Half-day rental (10 am-4 pm, or 5 pm -10 79.88 117.15 85.00 123.00 90.00 128.00 Pin) Tennis Courts 3.20 3.20 3.75Court/hr 4.75/court/hr 4.00/court/hr 5.00/court/hr Community Room - City Hall (NOTE: 2-hour minimum for after-hour rental): • Youth groups (8 am - 4:30 pm) Deposit only NIA Same Same Deposit only Deposit only • Youth groups - after hours (per hour) 9.59 N/A 11.00 Same 11.50 Same • Local civic groups (8 am - 4:30 pm) Deposit only N/A Same Same Deposit only Deposit only • Local civic groups - after hours (per hour) 26.63 N/A 29.00 Same 31.00 Same • Other citizen groups -Per hour rental 26.62 53 2 29.00 Same 31.00 60.00 -Maximum one-day rental 234.30 372.75 256.00 266.00 270.00 540.00 • For profit organizations -Per hour rental 63.90 63.90 69.00 75.00 72.00 -Maximum one-day rental 372.75 372.75 410.00 410.00 430.00 Sunshelters (per day) 37.28 58.58 43.00 64.00 45.00 67.00 Picnic kit: • 3 items 7.46 10.65 7.50 11.00 8.00 11.50 • Each additional item 3.20 5.33 3.50 5.50 4.00 6.00 r $50 de posit + $50 deposit + $50 deposit + $50 deposit +$50 deposit +$50 deposit Chuckwagon grill (per day) 37.28 58.58 43.00 64.00 45.00 67.00 Canopy (per day) 63.90 85.20 70.00 90.00 74.00 95.00 Extra picnic tables (each) 10.65 N/A 16.00 27.00 17.00 28.00 2003 2004, 2005 &2006 2007 PROPOSED FACILITY NON RESIDENT NON RESIDENT NON RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT Tubing at Trapp Farm Park 2.00 2.00 2.00/day 2.00/day 2.25/day 2.25/day Tubing Reservations only at Trapp Farm Park 3.00 4.00 4.00/person 5.00/person 4.25/person 5.25/person for groups of 20 to 80 people (1 V2 hour rental): Athletic facilities: • Fields - youth tournaments (per field per $ 42.60 $ 85.20 $ 48.00 $ 96.00 50.00 100.00 day) • Fields - all other users (per field per day) 63.90 127.80 70.00 140.00 73.00 147.00 • Lights, if required (per field per hour) 37.28 53.25 53.00 106.00 55.00 111.00 • Building cleaning (per full day use only) 63.90 79.88 70.00 85.00 73.00 89.00 Half day use (less than 4 hours) charges 70% of rate Field/facility maintenance fees: Unless obviously known, the user will be considered non-resident. Proof of residency of 75% or better will qualify for resident rate. • Traveling youth teams (per team) 85.20 N/A 96.00 N/A 100.00 N/A • Adult - up to 9 games (per team) 207.68 415.35 230.00 460.00 245.00 483.00 • Adult - more than 9 games, fee for each additional game >9 +216.63 47.93 + 32.00 + 54.00 + 34.00 + 57.00 Specially field set-up charge to be determined on a case-by-case basis. This cost would be in addition to the field use permit cost. Moonshine Park: Upstairs - retreat/meeting space (includes availability of overhead/coffee pot/kitchen) 75.00 85.00 78.00 90.00 • 8:00 am -Noon 75.00 85.00 78.00 90.00 • 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm NIA N/A 91.00 101.00 95.00 106.00 • 6:00 pm -10:00 pm 213.00 235.00 220.00 245.00 • Full Day (8:00 am - 10:00 pm) Downstairs - activity space • 8:00 am - Noon 64.00 75.00 67.00 79.00 • 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm 64.00 75.00 67.00 79.00 • 6:00 pm -10:00 pm 80.00 90.00 84.00 88.00 • Full Day (8:00 am - 10:00 pm) 187.00 208.00 195.00 218.00 2003 2004,2005 &2006 2007 PROPOSED FACILITY RESIDENT NON RESIDENT RESIDENT NON RESIDENT RESIDENT NON RESIDENT Commercial use of Parks N1A N'A • Use of subsidized park facilities, 15% higher 15% higher 15% higher 15% higher pavilions and Moonshine Retreat than the than the than the than the Center for fund raising or commercial public rental public rental public rental public rental profit generating activities. rate rate rate rate Bandshell at Central Park • Band Shell only - Half Day 340.00 425.00 355.00 445.00 Full Day 640.00 800.00 670.00 840.00 • Band Shell w/sound system - requires staff technician @ $20/hr*. Half Day *540.00 * 1.000.00 *565.00 *1050.00 Full Day *675.00 * 1,250.00 *705.00 *1310.00 • Band Shell in conjunction with wedding/reception reservation at ECC 55.00/hr 55.00/hr 58.00/hr 58.00/hr Central Park Festival Grounds (2006 start) • Ellipse only - one day event 140.00 250.00 147.00 295.00 Holz Farm Rental • Group size limited to 80 • Staff attendant required 230.00/dav 250.00/dav 240.00/day 295.00/day • Rentals during June, July & August ? attendant @ 4- attendant (? + attendant @ + attendant @ $10/hour $10/hour $10/hour $10/hour Puppet Wagon Rental • Staffed puppet wagon for private 200.00 250.00 210.00 265.00 rental for up to 25 children for one hour. Designed for ages 7 and under. Includes show, activity and/or games. Adult League Protest /Appeal Fee • Fee charged to team choosing to 50.00 50.00 53.00 53.00 protest rule or eligibility • Fee charged to team choosing to appeal suspension/expulsion I:Parks and Recreation/Advisory Parks Commission/Monthly Meetings/Fees and Charges 2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS and RECREATION 2007 Synopsis of Potential Projects • Patrick Eagan/Master Plan Implementation (Phase I) The Patrick Eagan master plan will include recommendations for improvements, modifications and mitigation efforts within the park. Upon acceptance of the plan in the fall of 2006 a prioritization of the recommendations will be required. A specific implementation schedule would be determined at that time. It is likely that some corrective actions related to existing slopes and trails as well as accommodating the relocation of the entrance would be considered early in the process. • Thresher Fields Improvements Thresher fields has become a popular and heavily used recreational and tournament facility. The City has submitted three requests to the State for a grant to assist with the installation of additional amenities including a toilet structure, shelter and trail improvements. To date, the State has had very limited funds and the first two grants requests were not funded. The third is pending but funding appears unlikely. The State grants are a 50/50 match requiring a local contribution. The option of entirely funding the project remains (50 % greater cost) • Holz Farm, Farmstead Upgrades The City and the Friends of the Farm are in the midst of completing the improvements suggested in the 2003 master plan. Most significant and high priority improvements related to the farm have been completed. A number of more minor improvements around the site, as outlined in the plan, remain. • Playground Upgrades A continuation of the ongoing and very popular playground renovation program. Three sites are proposed for 2007. The proposed sites have either diminished play value, signs of structural deterioration or both. Some still date to the 1980's • Oak Chase Court Renovation The courts have begun to show signs of structural failure. The use of a modular overlay system in other neighborhood parks has proven to be very popular with players as well as being very durable and cost effective. • Rink Renovation The renovation consists of the removal of the existing boards and the re-establishment of a functional grade on the rink surface followed by the installation of a new board system. One of the proposed rinks (Lexington) is seasonal, being installed and removed with winter. This renovation will not include paving. • Signage System Many of the existing standard park entry signs were installed over 20 years ago with the construction of the parks. Most are wooden, contain the old logo if any, and have begun to deteriorate necessitating replacement. Phase I of the program is proposed to include the installation of 10 to 15 signs made of a resilient composite (recycled) material that incorporates the new City logo. • Small Proiects An annual allocation intended to accommodate unexpected partnership opportunities and/or beneficial community projects. • Acquisition Opportunities An annual allocation intended to fund unexpected opportunities to acquire properties having benefit to the park system. (Does not include the 2006 allocation for a west Holz Farm access) PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST (2007 - 2011) Project stima e # Location Description Cost Notes 2007 1 Patrick Eagan park Master Plan, Phase I $150,000 2 TBD Playground Replacement $105,000 (3@ $35,000) 3 Holz Farm Park Farmstead Upgrading $15,000 4 Thresher Fields Shelter/Restroom $350,000 5 Oak Chase Park Court Renovation $50,000 (2 $25,000 6 TBD Rink Upgrades $145,000 7 TBD Si na e systemm Phase I $30,000 12 $2500) 8 Numerous Small Projects $30,000 9 TBD Acquisition Opportunities $650,000 PARK AND RECREATION I ?RTMENI a• ?a rec 307-11 4/2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST (2007 - 2011) Project Estimated # Location Description Cost Notes 2008 1 TBD Playground Replacement $105,000 3@ ($35,000) 2 TBD Rink U rades $20,000 2 ($10,000) 3 Trapp Farm Park Sun Shelter $30,000 4 Numerous Small Projects $30,000 5 Count Home park Tennis Court Renovation $30,000 6 TBD Si na e S stem, Phase II (12 @ $2,500) g:\budget\CIP 07-11/park rec 07-11 4/2006 PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST (2007 - 2011) Project Estimated # Location Description Cost Notes 2009 1 TBD Playground Replacement $105,000 3 ($35,000) 2 TBD Rink Upgrades $20,000 2 ($10,000) 3 Captain Dodd Park Sun Shelter $30,000 4 Numerous Small Projects $30,000 5 Bur Oaks Park Tennis Court Renovation $30,000 6 TBD Si na e System, Phase III $40,000 PARK AND RECREATION D RTMENT g:\budget\CIP07-11/parkrec 07-11 4/2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST (2007 - 2011) Project Estimated # Location JDescription Cost Notes 2010 1 TBD Playground Replacement $115,000 3@ ($38,000) 2 Carlson lake Park Fishing Pier $25,000 3 Numerous Small Projects $30,000 4 Numerous Small Projects $30,000 PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTOQUEST (2007 - 201 1) g:?budgeflCiP 07-11/park rec 0711 14/2006 Project Estimated # Location Description Cost Notes LU]1 1 TBD Playground Replacement $115,000 3@ ($38,000) 2 TBD Sun Shelter $35,000 3 BD Small Projects $35,000 PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST (2007 - 2011) Project Li 'on Description I Cost Notes g:\budget\CIP 07-11/pat rec 07-11 4/2006 OTHER PROJECTS Lighting 1 Lexin ton-Diffle Fields(6) $500,000 2 Northview courts $95,000 3 Big Goat Upgrade $90,000 4 Ohmann Soccer Fields (3) #280,000 5 Northview Fields 6-8 (3) $300,000 6 Rahn Courts Upgrade $30,000 Park Develo ment 1 Patrick Eagan Phase II (+) TBD 2 Holz Farm Park & Farmstead $425,000 3 Moonshine Park $250,000 4 Secton 16 (Federal Dr.) $200,000 5 Section 11 (Thresher South) $200,000 6 Rahn South $150,000 Master Plans 1 Rahn Park south $25,000 2 Section 16 $20,000 Park Improvements 1 Northview Courts Reconstruction $200,000 2 Rahn courts Reconstruction $120,000 3 Wandering Walk Trail $100,000 4 Bur Oaks Trail Paving $80,000 Misc. 1 School site partnerships TBD 2 Acquisitions Opportunities $650,000/yr g:\budget\CIP 07-11/parkrec 07-11 14/2006 2006/07 PARK SITE FUND BALANCE SUMMARY W/Acq. Opp, Alloc. W/o Acq. Opp. Alloc. Beginning Fund Balance 1/2006 $2,309.480 Est. Revenues and Other Financing Sources: Park Dedication Fees Interest Other $250,000 $70,000 $10,000 Total Revenue and Financing Sources $330,000 $330,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE $2,639,480 $2,639,480 Est. Expenditures: Park Improvements 2006 Land Acquisition Opp. (Undetermined) $400,000 $650,000 Total Improvement Expenditures 2006 $400,000 $400,000 W/Land Acquisition Allocation $1,050,000 $1,050,000 T. AVAILABLE FUNDS 1/2007 $1,589,480 $2,239,480 * Figures are un-audited estimates G:parksO6/06 07 CIP EST SUMMARY 0 PARK DEDICATION 2007 Current Eagan Cash Dedication Policy; "Said fee shall be determined by the average market value of undeveloped residential property by zoning classification, served by major City utilities, divided by the number of units per acre which shall provide the equivalency of 12 acres per thousand population". Resulting Formula; (a) Average Market X Value (ac. + % increase) (b) (c) Equivalency Units per Constant 100 Pop (1) (2) (d) Cash Equiv. Per Unit (1) Equivalency Constant = 1.2 This number converts the one acre market value to an equivalent value based upon the policy of 12 acres per 1000 population or 1.2 acres per 100 ; 100 residents x 10 = 1000 residents/ per policy calculation 1.2 acres x 10 = 12 acres of land/ per policy calculation (2) Average number of single units/ per 100 residents/ per zoning class The number is determined by dividing the average persons per household in each zoning classification into 100. The figures for the average number of residents per household have been adjusted in accordance with 2006 Met Council and Eagan City data. Because the average number of persons per household has decreased, the units per 100 population have increased. Updated Values/Units per 100 population (prior to 2006) • Single Family = 3.22/31 (3.35/29.8) • Duplex = 3.22/31 (3.33/30) • Townhouse/Quad = 2.06/49 (1.96/50.8) • Apts/Multi = 1.78/55.8 (1.81/56) • Commercial/Industrial = N/A, per acre only Formula Example; (Single Family) (a) $50,000 per acre X 1.2 = $60,000 V. 31 = $ 1935 per unit Discussion/Options "Upon request, a municipality must explain the basis of its fees" (Legislation, 2004) Determining Values A common practice used in the determination of the cash equivalency for park dedication has been to multiply an existing land value by a % derived from the rates being used by other comparable metro communities, essentially using the % to maintain an agreed upon position in the survey. While this method does continue to be used by municipalities, recent legislation has made justifying an increase based solely upon "positioning" more questionable. In determining the dedication fees for 2006, the APrC opted to review and update the connection between the per unit rates and land value. Staff conducted a review of over a thousand area properties and derived a new schedule of market values for use in making the calculation. Increases ranged from approximately 50% for Single Family to nearly 100% for Commercial/Industrial. The subsequent per unit dedication values, which resulted in substantial increases of over $1000 in most zoning categories, were adopted by the City Council for 2006. As a general reference, the increase did position Eagan in the "upper middle" on the metro scale. 2007 Discussion In anticipation of strengthening the relationship between land values and park dedication, and in preparation for setting 2006 fees, staff spent considerable time analyzing the market data from nearly 1000 properties in variety of zoning categories, throughout the community. A large sample was needed to account for the wide disparity in local values. The findings resulted in substantial modification to the fee structure and a justifiable "base line" of values for future computations. To develop the proposed dedication fee schedule for 2007, staff contacted the County Assessors office for information pertaining to the land value multiplier the County would use in Eagan. This multiplier is used to establish estimated values for use in the determination of annual property taxes. With a base line value recently established, an annual detailed analysis of a multitude of individual properties was not felt to be necessary in lieu of the County adjustments. According to the Assessors office, for 2006 property taxes payable in 2007 on residential properties in Eagan the County is using a 5.5% value adjustment. From all indications this is also an appropriate adjustment to use for other zoning categories. Utilizing the new occupancy and value adjustments yields the following Park and Trail dedication fee schedule for 2007; PARKS • Single Family = $81404 x 5% _ $85474 x 1.2 = $102569/31 $3308 per unit (06 = $3278) • Duplex = $80150 x 5% _ $84157 x 1.2 = $100989/31 = $3258 per unit (06=$3206) • TH/Quad = $134535 x 5% _ $141262 x 1.2 = $169514/49 = $3458 per unit (06 = $3178) • Apt/Multi = $142755 x 5% _ $149893 x 1.2 = $179871/51 = $3212 per unit (06=$3070) • Commercial = $5790 pna x 5% _ (value = $91887 x 5% _ $96481) $6080 per net acre (06=$5790) • Industrial = $4868 pna x 5% _ (value = $78813 x 5% _ $82754) $5111 per net acre (06=$4868) • Comm/Ind pre 1983 = $2493 pna x 5% _ $2618 per net acre (06=$2493) TRAILS • SF/bup/TH Quad/Apt/Mult. _ $238 x 5 % _ $250 per unit (06=$238) • Comm/Ind = $1251 pna x 5% _ $1314 per net acre (06 = $1251) H:/My Docs/Park Dedication Calc 07 Subject to approval ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION EAGAN,NIINNESOTA MINUTES OF ULAR. E'bN OF MANY 15, A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on May 15, 2006 with the following Commission Members present: Joseph Bari, Margo Danner, N. Mark Filipi, Laurie Halverson, Duane Hansen, Muhammed Lodhi, Dorothy Peterson, Richard Pletcher and Ryan Zip£ Phil Belfiori was not present. Staff included Director of Parks and Recreation Juli Seydell Johnson; Superintendent of Operations Cherryl Mesko; Superintendent of Parks Paul Olson; Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth and Recording Secretary Lori Kimball. APPROV4 N01 Member Filipi moved, Member Bari seconded; with all present members voting in favor to approve the agenda. APVAL OF(1TES April 17,2# Chair Peterson noted that dates for Holz Farm activities had been transposed and correct information is May 6 for Holz Farm clean up and May 21 for the spring event. It was noted that Member Pletcher was present and Member Lodhi was absent at themeeting. Member Bari moved and Member Danner seconded with all present members voting in favor to approve the April 17th minutes as amended. RESENTA7 OS AND RECOGi?FiTT 3 Member Danner recognized Laurie Halverson as the new APrC member. Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth presented a Citizen Lake Monitoring Volunteer Award to Joe Schaeffer for 10 years of monitoring Schwanz Lake. VISTTO1.TO BE .. N -Therewere-no visitors-to-be-heard Director Johnson provided a brief overview of activities and events within the department. 60N5LVTAGENDA Member Pletcher moved and Member Filipi seconded, with all present members voting to recommend to the City Council the following: • Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 19 1. This development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication, Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 15, 2006 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT PROFOSAL THE HERITAGE OF HIGHVIEW Superintendent Olson provided the background for this proposal noting that Gloria Fritz is requesting approval to create four single-family lots at 1420 Highview Avenue. The existing home will be removed and the land will be turned into a cul-de-sac with four single-family homes. This development would be subject to a cash parks dedication for the newly created lots. The proposed development is located on the north side of Highview Park. Currently, the only dedicated access to the park is from the south off of Highview Drive. As properties to the north develop and/or redevelop, it would be advantageous to have an access on the north side of High view Park. This would negate the need for park users to circle the park to gain access. A recommendation should be considered that would require the developer to provide a 20' wide easement between lots 2 and 3 and construct an 8' wide bituminous trail, in accordance with City specifications, within the easement. When recommending that a developer provide a trail section for a park purpose, it is common that credit be given for the cost of construction. For 2006 projects, the City Engineering Division calculated credit of $15 per lineal foot of 8'wide bituminous trail would be applied. Because the estimated value of the credit may exceed the calculated trail dedication a small credit could be applied toward the park dedication. Superintendent Olson reviewed the estimated costs that would be calculated at the time of the final plat approval. Superintendent Olson reviewed the tree preservation issues noting that with a proposed removal less than the allowable amount, there is no required tree mitigation for this proposal. It was also noted that due to the size and nature of this residential subdivision, water quality ponding is not feasible. To meet the City's water quality requirements a dedication of cash in lieu of ponding is appropriate for this development. There are no wetlands directly associated with this parcel. After brief discussion Member Danner moved and Member Bari seconded, with all present members voting to recommend to the City Council the following: 1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. This development shall provide a twenty foot (20') wide easement for trail purposes between lots 2 and 3. Within the easement the developer shall construct an eight (8') foot wide pedestrian trail in accordance with city specifications. Said trail is to be constructed prior to the issuance of a __---building -pennit_forlots2-or3- 3. The developer shall receive a credit of fifteen dollars ($15) per lineal foot of the trail. Said credit is to be applied first to the trail dedication amount due for the development. Any credit remaining shall be applied to the park dedication due. 4. A revised Tree Preservation Plan shall be required to be submitted that shows the placement of required Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site. 5. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 6. This development shall be responsible for a cash dedication in lieu of on-site water quality ponding. Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 15, 2006 Page 3 OLD BUSINES At their April meeting the Advisory Commission opened the public comment period for the proposal for public sculpture from the Eagan Art House. The Art House has asked that this request be pulled until the Patrick Eagan Park Master Plan has been completed. The Advisory Commission took official action to rescind the public review requirement based on the request by the Eagan Art House. -NEW BUS FS There were no items to review under New Business. Director Johnson introduced Sean McCaffrey who is interning with the City of Eagan as part of his college major of Parks, Recreation and Leisure Studies. McCaffrey said that his primary project was research pertaining to the miniature golf course that will be installed at Cascade Bay. He shared his process of researching other miniature golf courses, marketing strategies, staffmg, course rules and discovering the challenges that accompany owning miniature golf course and potential solutions. McCaffrey concluded he presentation by answering questions from the commission members. R6 vimwl Chair Peterson welcomed Laurie Halverson as a new APrC member. Member Danner noted that new officers are now in place on the commission. Dorothy Peterson is the Chair, Richard Pletcher is the Vice Chair and N Mark Filipi is the Secretary. With no further business to conduct, Member Peterson moved, Member Pletcher seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Secretary Date