Newspaper Clipping - Newspaper Clipping Scan - Holz Family Farmstead - 1/26/200741)L7_ FAMILY
-FkRwas
kii3- 'FPO\
a,.
l�
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
January 26, 2007
Ms. Joanna Foote
Communications Coordinator
Eagan Historical Society
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Ms. Foote:
We are pleased to inform you that the properties listed below will be considered by the
State Review Board for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The
Register is the official national list of historic properties worthy of preservation. The
agenda is as follows:
Stuntz Bay Boathouse Historic District, northern terminus of Stuntz Bay Road on
the south shore of Stuntz Bay, Lake Vermilion, Breitung Township (Soudan
Underground Mine State Park), St. Louis County
Authors: Erin Hanafin Berg and Charlene Roise, Hess Roise and Company
Willmar Tribune Building, 311 4th Street SW, Willmar, Kandiyohi County
Authors: Susan Granger and Scott Kelly, Gemini Research
Holz Family Farmstead, 4665 Manor Drive, Eagan, Dakota County
Author: Anthony Godfrey, PhD, US West Research
Payne Avenue State Bank, 965 Payne Avenue, St. Paul, Ramsey County
Author: Carole Zellie, Landscape Research Inc.
You are invited to attend the State Review Board meeting on Tuesday, March 20, 2007,
at which the nominations will be considered. The Preservation Office staff will make an
informational presentation on program activities at 6:45 p.m. The meeting will be called
to order and the nominations will be presented at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in
the Minnesota Historical Society History Center, 345 Kellogg Blvd. W., St. Paul,
Minnesota. A sign language interpreter is available with one weeks notice, and auxiliary
aids are available with two weeks notice. CaII 651/259-3450, or TTY 800/627-3529.
345 Kellogg Boulevard West/Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-1906/Telephone 651-296-6126
Listing of the properties provides recognition of the community's historic importance and
assures protective review of Federal and State projects that might adversely affect the
character of the properties. If the properties are listed in the National Register, certain
Federal investment tax credits for rehabilitation and other provisions may apply.
Listing in the National Register does not mean that limitations will be placed on the
properties by the Federal government. Public visitation rights are not required of
owners. The Federal government will not attach restrictive covenants to the properties
or seek to acquire them.
Enclosed please find a notice that explains, in greater detail, the results of listing in the
National Register and describes the rights and procedures by which an owner may
comment on or object to listing in the National Register. If you wish to comment in
writing on whether a property should be nominated to the National Register, please
send your comments to Secretary, State Review Board, State Historic Preservation
Office at 345 Kellogg Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55102-1906, before the State Review
Board considers these nominations on Tuesday, March 20, 2007. Any correspondence
received after the State Review Board meeting, but before final action is taken by the
Keeper of the National Register, will be forwarded to the National Register. A copy of
the nomination and information on the National Register and Federal tax provisions is
also available from this office upon request.
Should you have any questions about this nomination process before the State Review
Board meeting, please contact Susan Roth, National Register Historian, at 651/259-
3451, susan.roth@mnhs.org, or 345 Kellogg Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55102.
Sincerely,
z
Britta L. Bloomberg
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
enc.: National Resister Criteria
Rights of Owners to Comment and/or Object to Listing in the National Register
National Register Program Sheet
7
S
A,
NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering,
and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess
integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association
and
(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to
the broad patterns of our history; or
(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high
artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity
whose components may lack individual distinction; or
(d). that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory
or history.
CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS. Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of
historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious
purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed
historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that
have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for
the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of
districts that meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories:
(a) a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic
distinction or historical importance; or
(b) a building or structure removed from its original location but which is
significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure
most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or
(c) a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is
no other appropriate. site or building directly associated with their productive
life; or
(d) a cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of
transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from
association with historic events; or
(e) a reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment
and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and
when no other building or structure with the same association has survived;
or.
(f) a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition or
symbolic value has invested it with its own historical significance; or
a property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional
importance.
(g)
RIGHTS OF OWNERS TO COMMENT AND/OR OBJECT ,
TO LISTING ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Owners of private property nominated to the National Register have an opportunity to concur
with or object to the listing of the property in the National Register in accordance with the
National Historic Preservation Act and the 36 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 60.
Any owner or partial owner of private property who chooses to object to listing may submit, to
the State Historic Preservation Officer, a notarized statement certifying that the party is the sole
or partial owner of the private property and objects to the listing. Each owner or partial owner of
private property has one objection regardless of the portion of property the party owns. If a
majority of private property owners object, a property will not be listed. However, regardless if a
majority of the private property owners object to the listing, the State Historic Preservation Office
shall submit the nomination to the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places requesting
a determination of eligibility of the property.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to take into
account the effects of their actions on historic properties listed in the National Register,
determined eligible by the Keeper of the National Register, or determined eligible for the
National Register by the agency and the State Historic Preservation Office. Regulations of the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, an independent Federal agency, guide this
consultation process, which assures that the value of the historic property is considered in
project planning.
If you choose to object to the listing of the property, the notarized objection must be submitted to
the State Historic Preservation Officer, c/o Britta L. Bloomberg, Deputy State Historic
Preservation Officer, 345 Kellogg Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55102. Any correspondence received
after the State Review Board meeting, but before final action is taken by the Keeper of the
National Register will be forwarded to the National Register.
If you wish to comment on the nomination of the property to the National Register, please send
your comments to the address below. A copy of the nomination, the criteria used for evaluation,
and more information on the National Register program are available from the State Historic
Preservation Office. .
State Historic Preservation Office
Minnesota Historical Society
345 Kellogg Boulevard West
St. Paul, MN 55102
651 /296-5434
Fax: 651/282-2374
rnnshpocmnhs.orq
The National Register is maintained by the National Park Service in the U.S. Department of
Interior and administered in each state by the State Historic Preservation Office. For online
information about the National Register program go to http://www.cr.nps.gov/places.htm
September 1, 2004; June 2005
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PROGRAM
The National Register of Historic Places is the official list of historic properties recognized by the Federal
Government as worthy of preservation for their significance in American history, architecture, archaeology,
engineering and culture. The National Register was created in 1966 and is part of a national program to
coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect our significant historic places
under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act. The National Park Service provides oversight for
the program under the Secretary of the Interior. The program is managed by the professional staff of the National
Register in Washington, DC, State Historic Preservation Officers, and the Preservation Officers in Federal
Agencies. Contact the State Historic Preservation Office for a brochure describing the National Register program.
For online information go to:
http://www.cr.nps.qov/nr/owners.htm
http://www.cr.nps.aov/places.htm
http://www.mnhs.orq/preserve/shoo/index.html
http://nrhp.mnhs.org/
For further information, refer to, 36 CFR. (Code of Federal Regulations) 60. For online information go to:
http://www.access.apo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx 04/36cfr60 04.html
LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER PROVIDES BENEFITS TO HISTORIC PROPERTIES:
Eligibility for Federal tax provisions: Since 1976, the Federal Internal Revenue Code has contained a variety
of incentives to encourage capital investment in historic buildings and to spur revitalization of historic properties.
These incentives include a 20% investment tax credit to encourage the preservation of historic commercial,
•
industrial, and rental residential buildings listed on the National Register by allowing favorable tax treatments for
rehabilitation. Owners of National Register properties who choose to participate in the preservation tax incentive
program must follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and receive approval by the
National Park Service of the rehabilitation project in order to receive the tax credit.
A 10% rehabilitation tax credit applies only to non -historic, non-residential buildings built before 1936. The 10%
credit and the 20% credit are mutually exclusive. Buildings listed on the National Register are eligible only for the
20% tax credit. Owners of non -historic buildings in historic districts may claim a 10% credit only if they file a Part
1 Historic Preservation Certification Application with the National Park Service and receive a determination that
the building does not contribute to the district and is not a certified historic structure. Contact the State Historic
Preservation Office for a brochure describing the Preservation Tax Incentives. For online information go to:
http://www.cr.nps.qov/hps/tps/tax/index.htm
http://www.cr.nps.qov/helpyou.htm#tax
http://www.cr.nps.qov/hps/tps/tax/1RS.htm
http://www.cr.nps.qov/hps/tps/tax/incentives/index.htm
For further information on building certification requirements, refer to 36 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 67.
For on line information go to: http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/tax/taxregs.htm
Easement Donations: The Federal Internal Revenue Code also provides for Federal income, estate, and gift tax
deductions for charitable contributions or partial interests in real property (land and buildings). Taxpayers' gifts of
qualified interest may be "exclusively for conservation purposes." For online information go to:
http://www.cr.nps.qov/hps/tps/tax/easement.htm
Because tax aspects outlined above are complex, individuals should consult legal counsel or the appropriate
Internal Revenue Service office for assistance in determining the tax consequences of the above provisions.
Colleen Gallagher is the IRS representative who serves taxpayers in Minnesota. She can be contacted at
651/726-1480 or at colleen. k.gallagher(�irs.gov -
Consideration in planning for Federal, federally licensed, and federally assisted projects: Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their actions on
historic properties listed on or determined eligible for the National Register. Regulations of the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation, an independent Federal agency, guide this consultation process, which is intended to
assure that the value of the historic property is considered in project planning. For online information go to:
http://www.achp.cov
For further information on the Advisory Council, refer to 36 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 800. For
online information go to: http://www.achp.gov/regs-rev04.pdf
Qualification for Federal grants for historic preservation: Presently, funding levels are inadequate for these
grants to be available.
Consideration in planning for State, state licensed, and state assisted projects: Minnesota Statues Chapter
138 requires that state departments and agencies have the responsibility to protect the physical features and
historical character of properties listed in the National Register by consulting with the Minnesota Historical Society
before carrying out any undertaking, or funding, or licensing an undertaking by other parties to determine
appropriate treatments and to seek ways to avoid and mitigate any adverse effects on listed properties. For
further information, refer to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 138.665 and 138.666. The statutes are online at
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/138/665.html
http://www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/stats/138/666.html
Consideration before demolition: The rules of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) require
preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) by the responsible unit of government for any
proposed demolition of a property listed in the National Register. For further information on the Environmental
•
Quality Board refer to Minnesota Rules Parts 4410.0200, 4410.1000 and 4410-4300 subpart 31 or call 651/201-
2476. For online information go to:
http://www.revisor. leg . state. m n. us/aru le/4410/
http://server.admin.state.mn.us/resource.html?Id=1943
http://www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/arule/4410/4300:html
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE NATIONAL REGISTER PROCESS AND THE MEANING OF LISTING:
Listing on the National Register does not mean that the Federal Government wants to acquire the property, place
restrictive covenants on the land, or dictate the color or materials used on individual buildings. State and local
ordinances, local historical commissions, or laws establishing restrictive zoning, special design review
committees, or review of exterior alterations, are not a part of the National Register.
Historic properties of national, state, or local significance under private or local/state govemment ownership may
be nominated by the State Historic Preservation Office. Property owners, historical consultants and Preservation
Office staff may prepare nominations. The Federal agency's Federal Preservation Officer nominates properties
under Federal ownership to the National Register. For online information go to:
http://www.achp.qov/fpo.html
Tribal Historic Preservation Offices (THPO) perform the same type of preservation activities as those performed
by State Historic Preservation Offices. These activities, however, are associated with historic properties located
on Tribal Lands. Contact the State Historic Preservation Office for a list of Tribal Historic Preservation Offices in
Minnesota. For online information go to:
http://www.achp.gov/thr)0.html
Procedures have been developed to certify local,governments (CLG). The mayor and,the heritage preservation
commission as the CLG may comment on a property being nominated in their city. If both the mayor and the
heritage preservation commission determine that the property does not meet National Register criteria, the
nomination will not be considered unless an appeal is filed with the Preservation Office. For a list of certified local
governments, contact the Preservation Office.
Minnesota Historical Society
State Historic Preservation Office
345 Kellogg Blvd West
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
651/296-5434
Fax: 651/282-2374
mnshpomnhs.orq
http://www.mnhs.orq/preserve/shpo
September 1, 2004, June 8, 2005, June 27, 2005, June 7, 2006
To:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
situ OF eanon
MEMO
Joanna Foote
Beth Wielde, Parks Research and Special Projects
October 31, 2003
Eagan Historical Society questions
Joanna- I was wondering if I could enlist the brain power of the Eagan Historical Society on
two questions. I am working on a preliminary evaluation of the Holz Farmstead to be
reviewed by the State Historical Society. They will then determine whether it would be
worth the effort to eventually attempt a nomination to the National Register of Historic
Places, or if not, give us suggestions on preservation and restoration. Either way, it will
benefit the historic nature of the farm.
Anyway, part of doing the project in-house means chasing down information on the past. I
have two questions to pose the Eagan Historical Society, hoping that one or more of them
would recall some information from the Township years.
First, what were the duties of the Town Road Overseer? Otto Holz, Sr. (1880-1964) served
as Town Road Overseer for 18 years, and if, as I suspect, the Overseer assisted in creating
Eagan's road system, that's pretty significant for Eagan's development. I am trying to find
out when Mr. Holz was the Overseer to determine the historic context of Mr. Holz's
contribution to the development of Eagan. If it was a time of significant development, that
would be a great argument for eligibility under Criterion A: contribution to broad patterns of
history.
Also, Otto Holz was the Director for Eagan Town Mutual Fire Insurance Company for 30
years, aside from working the farm. Does anyone at the Historical Society know anything
about the Eagan Town Mutual Fire Insurance Company? Was it a pretty prosperous
business in the City of Eagan?
Any input the group might have into this matter would be appreciated. Or if I might be put
on the next agenda to address these questions to the group, that might work as well. I will
also address these questions to the Friends of the Farm, but I think the more heads put
together, the more likely I'll get really good information
Beth A. Wielde, Parks research and Special Projects
Eagancontinues negotiations for historic farm property
By BRENDA HAUGEN
Though the present asking.
price is higher than it is willing to
pay, the Eagan City Council was
pleased to hear the person
holding purchase options on the
Holz farm property is open to
negotiation. •
According to the staff report,
Dave Johnson, a real estate
agend and developer who has ac-
quired purchase options on the
Holz farm and Middlemist prop-
erties, is willing to sell the prop-
erties to the city for $400,000.
The report states the developer
Present price is deemed too high
feels he,can sell -the lots for bet-
ween $60,000 and $65,000, justify-
ing the $400,000 price. According
to the staff report, Johnson paid a
.total of $275,000 for the two prop-
erties. •
Even though the lots have lake
access, Mayor Tom Egan said he
doesn't believe the lots will bring
as • high a price as Johnson
believes they will.
"I think your expectations are
a little inflated," Egan said at the
Nov. 15 City Council. meeting.
xov ao, y c1 1-4 S 03b
He added that staff should work •
with Johnson to reach a pricetag
agreeable to both the council and
Johnson.
"We have an obligation to the
public to act prudently," Egan
•said.
Council Member Shawn Hunter .
agreed, saying he believes the
$400,000 figure is inflated, but
Johnson deserves "a fair return
on his investment."
Egan pointed out another con-
cern. With the city working for
months on a master parks
systems plan, does the, city want
to spend all the money allocated
for parkland on one location, he.
asked?
"The single biggest problem we
face is money," Egan said. "If we
spend all our money onthe right
fielder, what do -we spend on the
shortstop and all the others?",
City officials have discussed
the possibility of purchasing a
farm to preserve it for historic
value. The farm would be a
•
source of education and recrea-
tion for the local community as
well as a destination for tourists.
"It's important for the youth of
-our city, and other youth as well,
to see a functioning farm," said
Council Member Ted Wachter.
A study of the local farms found
the Holz farm and Middlemist
properties, located in the
southeast corner of Eagan, to be
the most attractive for several
reasons including their proximity
to the existing Holz Farm Park
and the condition of buildings on •
(See Farm, p.30A)
8:30 AM - 9 PM
Friday Until 6 PM
Saturday Until 5 PM
SERVICE HOURS
7AM-6PM
Wednesday Until 9 PM
Saturday 7:30 AM -Noon
435-8501
ACCELERATED
GNI EARN/NGS O
/ I !j E ORK'" O4
The af1Gard Eff, E .
THE BOTTOM LINE: ONE PRICE UP FRONT
2A NOVEMBER 20, 1994 TH1SWEEK
Farin
(C5iitinued from front page)
the site.
"It (other local farms) just
doesn't have the kind of historical
significance this property has,"
said Mayor Tom Egan. "It's a
gem."
How exactly such a site would
be used has yet to be determined.
Parks and Recreation Director
Ken Vraa has pointed out several
possibilities, including staffing
the _farni with people -in period
costumes to add a more historic
flavor to the site.
The city has received several
letters from those hoping this
farm site will be preserved, in-
cluding members of the Holz
family. Most of the letters, in-
cluding one from 8-year-old Tim
.Usset, were from people from
other communities.
Usset, of Buffalo, talked about
going to the Holz farm with his
parents and the importance of
preserving the city's` past. .
"Their (the Holz's) farm is the
only real part of Eagan left," he
wrote in the tall letters of a child.
"How people will learn about the •
old Eagan with just„ books and
papers. It would be a lot more fun
to see part of the old Eagan than
books and pictures. Everybody
that goes will know that there
were special people that lived
there. Please try your best to
save it."
, One woman from Eagan,. Pam
Scharffbillig, did come forward
at the City Council meeting to
voice her support for purchase of
the farm.
"This is something that is real-
ly, .truly history," she said. "We
can't bulldoze this over."
Laurel Anderson of Eagan
agrees. In a letter to City Ad-
ministrator. Tom Hedges, Ander-
son said, "The buildings could
serve a valuable purpose in help-
ing people understand and appre-
ciate their communi•ty's
historical past. Eagan has main-
tained very little if any resources
for this purpose. An understan-
ding and appreciationiof Eagan's
past is a valuable part of a feeling
of community."
Johnson said he would like to
make a profit on this land, but in
selling it to the city he wouldn't
make as much- as he would
otherwise. Yet, he 'said he real-
izes the benefits to the city for ac-
quiring the Holz and Middlemist
properties, and he has a willing-
ness to sell it at a reasonable
price.
"Everything is for sale," he
said.
But a couple of builders are -in-
terested in the properties,
Johnson said.
According to the staff report,
Johnson had been planning to de-
velop the property into an 11-lot
subdivision beginning in 1995. •
The council directed staff to
continue negotiations.
ting the senior pastor position left
vacant in June. Before serving at
Victory, Davin planted a new
church in Duluth in the early_'70s
and spoke at a variety of chur-
ches and seminars across the
country. He was involved in the
"House Church" movement in
Great Britain, traveling annually
to England, Wales and Northern
Ireland: -
The installation service begins
at 10 a.m. Pastor Bill Davis of
Tampa, Fla. will preach and Jon
Marsden, the area pastoral coor-
dinator' for the Association of
Vineyard Churches, will help of-
ficiate. A reception will follow.
Victory Vineyard, a 450-
member. congregation, is located
at 13798 Parkwood Drive. For
more information, call 892-1000.
Thanksgiving
service
St. James Lutheran Church,
Burnsville, will host the
Ecumenical Community
Thanksgiving Eve Service
Wednesday, Nov. 23 at.7:30 p.m.
Participating churches are The
Mark Jurgensen, ancy rickson, Joan Lamkert,
Jeanne Lambert, Terry Nielsen, Trygve Peterson, Tim
Robinson, Tom Skaro, Gene Stimson and Kevin Wag
goner. Hosanna! crew leaders were Jay Blakeborough
and Larry Satrang.
HIV/AIDS
An interdenominational group
has been formed to address the
needs of people affected by
HIV/AIDS in Dakota County. _
The group, Faith Community
Cares, provides education,
transportation, meals, respite
care, resources and support
group meetingsthe second and
fourth Thursdays of the month.
Meetings are at 7:30 p.m: at
Faith Covenant Church, 12821
Nicollet Ave., Burnsville. For
more information, call 890-3110 or •
894-3578.
`Messiah'
The Dakota Valley Chamber
Orchestra and Chorus will per-
form Handel's "Messiah" Dec. 4,
7 p.m., at Messiah Lutheran
Church in Lakeville.
The ` performance'' is :free and':. r
open to the public. It will be
presented in Messiah's new 500-
seat sanctuary. There will be a
free-will offering with a - sug-
gested -donation of $5 per adult
and $10 per family.
Messiah Lutheran Church is
located at 16725 Highview Ave. in
Lakeville, between 160th Street
and Dodd Boulevard. For more
information, call 431-5959.
Hannah Warner
6/03/2010
Holz Farm Project
Toys/Games at a 1940's Farm
Holz farm is an excellent representative of what life used to be like in 1940s
Minnesota, and has many artifacts of its household still in existence. One of the most
important forms of entertainment for younger generations at the farm (and in society
today) was a toy. Toys are fascinating and even important because they help to show how
far we've come (for example, simple games like marbles evolving to more complex ones
like video game). The difference in complexity will be obvious when a toy from 1899
(when Holz farm was first established) is compared with toys from 1993 (when Otto Jr.
and Ella Holz passed away.)
Many classic toys were created towards the end of "the gilded age." For example,
in 1900, a battery- powered train was created. Another classic toy that was invented was
the "teddy bear," in 1902, with the first box of Crayola crayons being produced in 1903.
More famed toys created were Tinker Toys (1914), Raggedy Ann Dolls (1915), and the
"Sony!" board game (1934). It's surprising how old well-known games and toys today
really are.
After World War II began for the U.S. in 1941, toys were created differently.
Since rubber and metal was being used for the war effort, toys and game production
practically shut down, and new toys were very rare. One thing children played with
during that time were paper dolls made of cardboard. Often children made their own toys,
or they played games with their friends. There were hardly any new toys invented during
WWII, and when they were, it was often accidental —like in the discovery of the "Slinky"
(1943).
After World War II ended, however, there was an influx of new toys. Some
examples of toys that are still enjoyed today were Mr. Potato Head in 1952 and the Tonka
Truck in 1957. Another two favorite toys that were invented after WWII (and before Ella
Holz and Otto Jr. passed away) were Barbie and Beanie Babies. (Beanie Babies were
actually invented the year of their deaths.) Many influential toys were invented after
WWII that are still known today.
It is surprising how many common toys played with today have celebrated their
centennial already. So many have stood the test of time, though it's only matter of time
before "the next big thing" replaces them. But should that happen, the few toys adorning
the Holz residence will give testament to the toys of yesterday. It may even reveal
something about the characteristics of the generation that played with it. But for now, we
can simply identify with the children who played with those toys on Holz farm, for they
also passed the time with toys.
Hannah Warner
6/03/2010
Holz Farm Project
Life on a 1940's Farm
As you can imagine, life on a Minnesota farm in the 1940s for Otto and Ella Holz
was very different than life today. Almost everything was different —the jobs available,
the clothes worn, even how they had fun. Let's take a look back and see some examples
of how the quality and way of living has changed since the Holz family was farming in
the 1940s...
> Water. In that time period, they had to manually go and fetch water from a lake or
river and lug it back all the way home. It took effort and time. They also dug
wells by hand or used windmills to power small pumps to water livestock or small
gardens. In today's society (for most of us), all it takes to get fresh water is by
turning on the tap.
> Electricity. It may be hard to believe, but there was no electricity until 1940, and
even then it was typically first installed in the barn. Wondering what they used
before? Answer: Kerosene lamps. The lamps were covered with cheesecloth and
cow chips were used to provide the fuel.
> Communication Methods. In the 1940s, a rotary phone was standard on most
farms. Many times, they also shared a phone line with two other people. Unlike
today, there were no cell phones, computers, interne access or even color
televisions.
> Daily Life. Life in the kitchen was also much different in that time period. For
example, the Holz family used a wood -burning stove with a wood box next to it.
They also kept a "refrigerator." No, not an electric one —this one worked with the
ingenious help of a strategically placed icebox. In the winter they would cut ice,
then, in the summer they would cover it with sawdust, and use it in the
"refrigerator." They had to continually replace the ice because it melted.
Life is much more convenient now than it was in the 1940s. There is more luxury,
opportunity, and knowledge of our world. The trick now is to appreciate the difference,
or it wouldn't be as enjoyable. Also, let us celebrate how far we've come, and let us
respect our ancestors, for none of what we have now would be possible without them.
The only thing we don't know now, that we didn't know in the 1900s is; what will our
next big discovery be?
Wash tub at
Holz Farm
Hannah Warner
6/03/2010
Holz Farm Project
Chores on a 1940's Farm
Modern farming is easy compared to rudimentary old-fashioned farming. In the
beginning, farming was a lot of work. It was necessary for everyone to help out at the
farm. Sometimes relatives and neighbors even helped. There were many chores that
needed to be done on Holz farm.
To begin with, the women had a very important role in farming. They performed
essential jobs like cooking the meals, baking, cleaning, and milking the cows. They also
looked after the children. Women did more on the farm that meets the eye.
The kids also helped out on the farm, though they didn't have as important roles
as the adults. The boys helped the men as best they could with planting, sowing, etc. The
girls also helped out on the farm, they helped the women cook, thus learning how to run a
household in turn. Also, the older children helped make hay, and some even drove the
tractor! Children assisted the adults immensely and as reimbursement learned how to run
the farm.
The men were another key part of fanning. The men did most of the physical
labor when farming was very remedial. They did work such as plowing, fieldwork,
planting, and harvesting. They also had a chore of teaching their sons how to run things
so they could eventually do it on their own some day. Men were a key part of farming,
considering physical labor was also a key part of farming.
The amount of effort required for farming is incredible. That's why less than five
percent of the American population farms today. Though the chores were rudimentary
and laborious, they were necessary for a farm like Holz farm to work. Though more and
more factory "farms" are replacing real farms, it's still interesting to go back to the roots
of farming and examine the type of effort it takes to make farming, farming. Also, it is
always important to look back on where we came from (after all, Holz farm is a perfect
example of what Minnesota used to be like) in order to see how far we've come.
Hannah Warner
6/03/2010
Holz Farm Project
Works Cited
Fleming, Lisa. Lone Oak Years: A History of Eagan, Minnesota.
[Minnesota]: Viking, 1985. Print.
Gimlin, Hoyt. The Continuing Decline of Rural America.
Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1990. Print.
Hildebrand, John. Mapping the Farm: The Chronicle of a Family.
New York: Knopf, 1995. Print.
"History of Toys and Games." The Great Idea Finder - Celebrating the
Spirit of Innovation. Web. 05 June 2010. <http://www.ideafinder.com/
history/category/toys.htm>.
Peterson, Dorothy. "1940s Farm Interview." Personal interview.
1 May 2010.
Snyder, Rebecca. Old Days in Dakota County: Pioneer Narratives of Early
County History Originally Published in the Dakota County Tribune
from 1904-1907. South St. Paul, MN: Dakota County Historical
Society, 1999. Print.
BLACKSMETH
HOLZ FARM MAP
SELF GUIDED TOUR
CHICKEN
COOP
MILK &
PUMPHOUSE
OUTHOUSE
SMOKEHOUSE
E SHED
CCRIBORN .
MACHINE SHED
GRANERY
MACHINE SHED
HOLZ LAKE
PARKING
WELCOME TO HOLZ FARM, A 1940'S ERA FARMSTEAD.
FOLLOW THE POSTS D TO LEARN INTERESTING FEATURES OF THE FARM.
SEE OTHER SIDE FOR INFORMATION ON EACH LANDMARK.
WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR VISIT!
2010 EAGLE SCOUT PROJECT - TYLER BECKER
Holz Farm Self Guided Tour
1. 20 feet to the left is one of the largest Bur Oak trees in Eagan. It is
believed to be about 200 years old. It is one of the many large Bur
Oak trees on the farm.
2. The small oak tree that you see here is actually right over the spot
where the hand dug water well once was. It was about 20 feet deep.
3. To the left is the inlet of the drainage pipe for the onion field. The
outlet is down by the lake (#4). Wow that's pretty deep! Can you
imagine digging that by hand? That's a lot of work!
4. 6 feet left, towards the lake is the hand dug drainage pipe outlet that
leads all the way up to the onion field. It was dug with the help of
some surrounding farmers.
5. About 20 feet to the south is where the original farmhouse stood prior
to 1911.
6. At this spot, the barnyard dog drove the Ford Model T truck into Holz
Lake. The dog jumped into the truck, bumped it into gear and drove it
down the hill into the water!
7. This house will be turning 100 Years old in 2011.
8. This is where the brooder house stood to raise baby chicks. As many as
200 chicks lived here before they were moved to the chicken coop by
the barn.
9. This gate is a piece of the original garden fence that stood there almost
80 years ago. It has traveled to California and Missouri before
returning home.
10. The wooden silo was taken down in 1978 for safety but stood as tall
as the barn. It now has a deck built on its foundation.
2010 Eagle Scout Project — Tyler Becker
Vt4
HOLZ FARM PARK
HISTORIC FARMSTEAD REPORT
(DRAFT COPY)
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF EAGAN
PARKS & RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
DULY 15TH, 2003
PREPARED BY:
MILLER DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTS, INC.
123 NORTH 3RD STREET, SUITE 104
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
PH: (612) 337-0000
Historic Farmstead Report
Farmstead Introduction
A. Project Overview and Property Timeline
B. National Registration Nomination Process
•
Reviews and Recommendations
A. Existing Building Condition Reviews
B. Program and Accessibility
C. Life Safety, Security and Maintenance
D. Budget
•
Appendix
A. Resources
B. Farmstead Images
PROJECT OVERVIEW "
Master Plan Process:
The historic Holz farmstead was purchased by the City of Eagan in 1995. The farm is picturesquely set
overlooking a small lake with 10 of the original 13 structures remaining in the farmyard. The farm is also
linked to an existing City park. Through public as well as volunteer efforts, the farm structures are being
secured and restored to their 1940's appearance. The City's goal is to preserve this largely intact farm site
and create public programs to experience farm fife in the post -depression and world war era.
In 2002/03, the City of Eagan hired the team of Brauer and Associates, Ltd., and Miller Dunwiddie Architects,
Inc., (MDA) to provide master plan services for the Holz Farm Park. Brauer and Associates, landscape
architects, lead the planning efforts to develop options to integrate and strengthen the farm and park. Miller
Dunwiddie Architects' (MDA) roles included reviewing the farmstead structures and generating
recommendations regarding historic aspects of the project. MDA's recommendations were based on
reviewing the current conditions and focused on historic rehabilitation approaches, accessibility/program
options and maintenance issues.
Through a series of staff, volunteer and neighborhood meetings, a final master plan and report were
generated through a consensus process. A key factor in the master plan was the integration of the site into a
more unified park that will provide for a cross-section of recreational, educational and historical experiences.
The master plan report provides not only a beginning documentation of oral histories of the buildings and
overall farmstead, but also documents the stewardship of the buildings with recommendations for future
building or program development.
Master Plan Report Summary:
The report covers three areas: history, building conditions and programs, and recommendations with budget
estimates for high priorities items.
The introduction section provides a historic timeline for the property. Information about applying for
nomination to the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places is briefly described. The Holz
farm could be also be eligible for local and/or state designation.
The focus of the report is evaluating the existing building conditions after seven years of diligent efforts to
address many structural and/or deferred maintenance items. Short Elliot and Hendrickson (SEH), an
engineering firm, prepared a conditions report with budgets when the City of Eagan purchased the Holz
property in 1995. From 1995 to 2002, the City's Staff combined with volunteer and hired contractor efforts
preceded with stabilizing many of the structures. Most of the buildings are now weather tight and suitable for
public access.
Currently, four major public events are held on the farm along with private and scheduled tours of the site.
Defining the historic farmstead with a strong trail development could invite visitors from the park to explore the
farm. With the development of accessible routes and signage, programs could be expanded to weekly public
tours, barn programs, gardening opportunities or private events such as graduation parties or family reunions.
Program options including educational opportunities, accessibility and life safety items, and maintenance
recommendations are reviewed. This section includes proposed reconstruction of the wood stave silo,
outhouse and brooder house. It also discusses expansion of the animal program from chickens to seasonal
display of baby or young animals and what upgrades could be required of the property and/or buildings to
support this program development. Maintenance is always important on an historic property. These
recommendations are tied to resource information in the appendix. The National Park Service has published
briefs and technical bulletins about general as well as specific approaches for preserving, restoring and
rehabilitating historic properties.
To complete the report, recommendations made throughout are gathered. Preliminary budget estimates are
provided for the high priority items. It is assumed that each recommendation is completed independent of any
other recommendations. Thus, there would be cost savings by completing similar projects in one contract
Holz Farm Timeline
History of Property — Construction and Repairs:
1861 Eagan Township established
1870s Wilhelm and Eliza Holz Settle 80-acre parcel in Section 24
Run blacksmith shop
Raise eight children
1899 Otto Holz Sr. Purchase 220 acres in Section 36 - current farm site
Construct original house
(north of machine shed, demolished)
Construct original privy (demolished)
Construct original bam and silo
(date unknown, destroyed)
Hand dug well
1902 Otto & Louisa Holz Sr. Marry and raise four children
Construct granary
Construct machine shed
Construct hillside shed
Construct chicken coop
Construct windmill with pump house at base
and new well
1911
Construct existing house
Construct privy (circa, demolished)
Remove original house and privy (circa)
Construct brooder house (circa, demolished)
1910-20s Plant original flower garden
1920 (circa)
1923
1924
1926
1927
1930 (circa)
1933 Otto and Ella Holz Jr.
1938
Porch enclosed at south side of house
Construct concrete stock tank
Construct smoke house (license plate cornerstone)
Local phone service provided
Fire destroy bam and silo
(portion of original foundation may remain)
Construct existing barn and silo
Construct hog/sheep addition to hillside shed
Marry (no children)
Add east chimney and wood stove to kitchen
Purchase Holz farm for $5,500
1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
such as grouping exterior painting for one more than one building into one overall project. The estimates are
based on 2003 costs and do not include professional fees and/or independent testing for items such as paint
analysis or hazardous material survey.
Farmstead Key Plan:
FARM ENTRANCES C
• A farm entrance gate for character
and traffic control.
• Site orientation/information sign.
PARKING AREA
Turf parking area for approximately
10 cars for day -to -dal parking.
EQUIPMENT SHED
• Prosides equipment protection.
• Proides equipment display*.
FARM BUILDING STRUCTURES
Rebuild missing structure that 101 rcpreseal the
appropriate lime era and maintainllmprosr existing
structures as apprupriate. Structures arcs Potions:
I. PROPOSED 6. REBUILT
REBLILT MACHINE SHED
BROODER 7. GRANARY &
HOUSE & PEN MACHINE SHED
2. PROPOSED S. MILK & PUMP!
REBLILT 11 ELL HOUSE
OLTHOUSE
9. CHICKEN COOP
3. SMOKF, HOUSE 10. STOCK TANK
4. STORAGE & 11. BARN
HOG/SHEEP 12. PROPOSED
SHED REIMILTSILO
5. CORN CRIB 13. FARM 11OtSE
RESTROOM ENCLOSURE
Portable restroom enclosure to be located
in an accessible but unobtrusive area.
FARM TRAILS
Trails within the farm site to be 6'-8' wide
aggregate. Interpretive farm signage mill
allow users to take a self -guided tour.
FARM SIGNAGE •
Informational/educational signage
to be placed at points of interest.
Prrprrea for:
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Prrpamn In:
BRAUER
Prvjri&c al
n.:r: 412411
FARM ENTRANCES C
• A farm entrance gate for character and
10 identify historic farm entrance.
• Site orientation/Information sign.
FISHING PIER
2
1940s (circa)
1940
1941
1942
1943
1945
1948 (circa)
1959
1970 (circa)
1975 (circa)
1970/80's
TIMELINE
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Construct gas house addition to hillside shed
(for tractor)
Add north chimney and oil furnace
REA electricity provided to farm
WWII began
Demolish and salvage windmill parts for war effort
Construct existing milk and well house
Automobile production cease
Rationing of food supplies began
Victory gardens re -instituted
WWII end
Build addition to granary
Add north chimney for wood furnace
Reshingle house and remove gutters and downspouts
New well for house with foundation modification in
basement
Portion of farm sold for development of South Oaks
Addition
Replace wood furnace with existing oil furnace
Remove deteriorated wood silo
Portion of farm sold for development of Manor Lake
Addition
1993 Developer Purchase remaining farmstead and property
1995 City of Eagan & Friends of Farm
1996
1996
Purchase of farm property by City of Eagan (Jan 1st)
Form Holz Farm Task Force (May) and prepares
report with recommendation to restore farm to
1940's post -depression era
Major cleanup of site and buildings
Abatement of bat dropping from house attic
Begin restoring original flower garden with Eagan Garden Club
Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) survey buildings and
prepares report that is issued in November
Re -roof house with cedar shingles
Rewire house and upgrade power
Rebuild smoke house
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
Rebuild west porch of house
Rebuild concrete ramp at barn
Reinforce haymow floor of barn
Rebuild barn doors
Replace milk house doors
Rebuild front of chicken house
Paint exterior of house
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
SEH provides structural examination and
evaluation of barn (April)
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
TIMELINE
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Construct accessible wood ramp at house
Construct accessible wood ramp at barn
Rewire barn
Regrade barnyard
Replace barnyard fence
Paint interior of house
Clear and identify lake trail
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
Re -roof granary
Replace barn windows
Clean out silo pit
(Pit area below lower level of barn was not excavated)
Build wood deck to cover silo pit
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
Replace chicken house windows and add screens
Remove and replace southeast machine shed
Set flag pole and flag
Provide benches in flower garden
Construct chicken yard fence
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
Re -roof hillside shed with wood shingles
Paint new machine shed
Repair concrete foundation walls at barn
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
Re -roof barn with wood shingles
Re -roof chicken house with wood shingles
Rebuild fuel storage shed addition
Replace curtains in house
Paint milk/pump house
Continue restoring original flower garden with
Eagan Garden Club
2002/3 Brauer & MDA prepare Master Plan for farm and park
3
NATIONAL REGISTRATION NOMINATION PROCESS
Restoration/Rehabilitation Period Selection:
1940's decade depicting rural farm life in a post -depression and world war era
Process:
Nomination to the National Register is facilitated one of three ways depending on the owner of the
property. It will be coordinated either by the local State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in which the
property is located, Federal Preservation Office (FPO) if the property is under Federal ownership/control,
or Tribal Preservation Office (TPO) if it is on tribal lands. For the Holz Farm, the process would involve
close coordination with Minnesota's State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). In Minnesota, the person
currently responsible for nomination submission to the National Register is Susan Roth.
It will be helpful to have a preliminary meeting with SHPO to discuss the merits of the farmstead and
hopefully, gain their support of the nomination prior to embarking on compiling the form. Properties are
eligible for listing on the National Register due to age, events, association with persons of significant
pasts, distinctive characteristics and/or potential to yield important historical information. The SPHO staff
person will be able to provide direction on qualifying criteria for this specific property.
Individuals, consultants or SHPO staff can prepare the nomination form for the property. The nomination
form will require extensive research, descriptive writing and attention to detail. Submission of draft copies
of the nomination form are encouraged for review by SHPO as the work is in progress. Preparing the
nomination form may take any where from three to six months before it is ready for official SHPO staff
review.
Upon submission to SHPO, the staffs nomination review process could be from ten to fourteen weeks.
SHPO's process will take the full fourteen weeks if there is a local heritage preservation committee. Extra
time could also be required for notification of intent to property owners and/or local officials. If during this
time, significant objection to the nomination is discovered, SHPO can forward the nomination to the
National Park Service (NPS) for a determination of eligibility and than proceed with the State process if
eligible.
Once approved, the SHPO staff will than forward the nomination to Minnesota's State Review Board,
which meets four times a year.
If the State Review Board and SHPO as well as the property owner(s) agree to the nomination, SHPO will
finalize the nomination for submission to the NPS, the federal agency that administers and guides the
historic preservation program. SHPO may take two to three weeks to complete the submission process
before forwarding to the NPS. When the NPS receives the nomination, a thirty to forty-five day review
process begins to determine approval or not for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Benefits:
Status is one of the notable benefits to listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Donors may
see the project as receiving a stamp of approval not only at the local but also at the state and federal
levels.
Depending on the proposed project, there could be building code exceptions and/or tax credits available
that could be a tremendous benefit to a proposed project. If federal funds or grants will be allocated for a
project, additional time will be required to comply with the review processes by SHPO and NPS. This
could be an asset, however, to ensure that appropriate materials and methods will be used for the project.
Even if federal funds are not involved with the project, a review for no change by SHPO is usually wise to
prevent loosing the listing on the National Register.
1
NATIONAL REGISTRATION NOMINATION PROCESS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Projects, not necessarily within in the boundaries of the farmstead, could jeopardize the integrity of this
historic site. For example, if a proposed highway project is near or could possible encroach on the
property; a Section 106 Process must be completed to determine the impact on a historic site. Without a
formal historic designation, the current good intentions of the City and/or concerned volunteers may not
be enough to prevent a slow encroachment of modem changes to the Holz farm.
Recommendations
1. Determine City and public support for nominating the Holz Farm to the National
Register of Historic Places.
2. Organize a preliminary meeting with Susan Roth, SHPO, to review the current
conditions and eligibility status of the property.
3. Contact SHPO for a list of consultants who prepare National Register Nominations
and meet with a consultant to learn more about assembling a nomination form.
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
HOUSE (1911 to present)
"The house is at the heart of a farm wife's life." (Families & Farmhouses in 19t" Century America) The
location of the new (1911) Holz's farmhouse typifies the importance of her role in daily farm life. The new
house was re -sited from the original house's location from the bottom to the top of the hill. Here, it now
becomes the hub in the wheel with the buildings, gardens and fields radiating like spokes from this
viewing point. Ventilation was improved and was considered beneficial for health.
This typical farm house plan is designed for efficiency and flexibility. The kitchen is on the main level and
is entered from both the north and the south through an enclosed porch. The enclosing of the south
porch may have reduced the ventilation to kitchen, but provided a transition space into the clean house.
The kitchen is the control center for preparing and serving meals, for producing butter, for canning
vegetables and for conducting farm business. The dining room and parlor were one large, open room,
perhaps to provide the flexibility during harvest and holiday times for feeding large gatherings.
In the Holz's farmhouse, there is also one bedroom on the first level. The first floor bedroom might be
attributed to the farmwife's role. This room, sometimes called the "birthing room," was practically located
on the main level for women in childbirth and for caring for the elderly or sick. There are four bedrooms
located on the second level, which are accessed from an interior stair off the dining room. At one time
(1930's), this house had two generations of the Holz's family living in its rooms.
The exterior of the Holz's farmhouse style is Folk Victorian with simple detailing. The house has wood
clapboard siding with trim banding at the porches, siding corners, fascia and foundation line. Sawn,
cedar shingles were probably the original roofing material. This two-story house has a main gable
running north -south with a gable projecting to the east for the kitchen. Three porches are attached to the
house; the main porch faces west and provides an entrance to the parlor/dining room area. The
previously described enclosed kitchen porch is found on the south and a new porch that provides ADA
access on the north. A bay window with stained glass projects from the south elevation of the dining
room. Wood six -panel doors are found at the three exterior entrances with the second and third doors
exiting to the north and south from the kitchen.
Originally, there were two masonry chimneys, one near the center of the north -south ridge for the dining,
parlor, and bedroom areas. The second chimney projects from the east ridge line and is for the kitchen
stove(s). In the later 1940s, the center chimney was abandoned when an oil furnace was located in the
1
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
basement. A third, brick chimney was constructed on the face of the north elevation for the new heat
source. The center chimney is no longer visible above the roof.
EXTERIOR:
Roof:
House, Porches and Bay Window
The roof system was replaced in 1996 with cedar shingles. Proper venting of this roof system will
reduce maintenance requirements and lengthen its useful life. The roof has metal flashings,
probably galvanized metal. Gutters and downspouts were not observed on the structure. Round,
galvanized gutters were removed when the house was reshingled in the 1940s. The gutters and
downspouts had been linked to the cistern below the kitchen.
Chimneys
Two chimneys are active and constructed of a red brick. One is found within the kitchen, and the
second attached to the exterior face of the north elevation. The north chimney is currently leaking
into the basement. There open mortar joints and missing bricks that should be replaced. A third
chimney, in the center of the structure, is inactive and has been lowered probably to within the
attic. This modification occurred before the recent reroofing project and may have been during
the late 1940s.
Walls:
Foundation
The foundation walls were laid in a random fieldstone or ashlar pattern. Currently, there are
some open mortar joints.
Exterior Walls
The house is wood framed, perhaps balloon -framed as would be typical of this construction era.
Framing, however, was unobservable. An adjustable steel column system has been added in the
basement that supports the wood beam and floor joist system above.
Porches and Bay Window:
The house has three porches that are set upon concrete foundation walls. Two porches, the west
and south, have wood floors and ceilings. The west porch has been reconstructed. It has four
round columns with minimal base and cap detailing support the sloping, hipped roof. The south
porch has three posts, which appear to be square. This porch was enclosed prior to the 1940s.
Wood siding and framing were constructed between the columns along with two wood windows
and an exterior door. The concrete steps and railings from the west and south porches may not
comply with current codes. The open deck north porch was added in 1998 to provide handicap
access and was constructed of unpainted treated lumber..
Windows:
The wood windows are double-hungs with two -over -two muntin patterning. Some of the windows
have the original storm panels. Wood security screens have been installed over all these
openings.
Exterior Doors:
Three, six -panel wood doors are located on the north, south and west elevations. A screen door
has been added to the north door opening. The exterior doors have a paint finish.
2
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Exterior Recommendations
1. Repair deteriorated siding and trim. Paint
2. Original photographs should be reviewed to determine type and configuration for new
gutters and downspouts. If none is observed, gutters and downspouts are
recommended but should be of rounded profiles.
3. Review venting of the attic and roof.
4. Review warping of west porch floor system and provide discreet venting of
crawlspace.
5. Review wood windows and storms. Repair and paint as required. (Note: Replace
modem glass with historic, reproduction glass.)
6. Review security screen design and attachment to the structure at all window
openings. If the existing screen system remains, the wood frames require scraping
and painting.
7. Review flashing and mortar conditions of chimneys.
8. Restore center chimney to reflect 1940's house configuration. The chimney work
could be phased with the next re -roofing cycle.
INTERIOR - LOWER LEVEL
Kitchen Crawlspace:
A cistern is located below the kitchen, and the walls are constructed of fieldstone. This space is
accessed from a trap door in the kitchen floor.
Basement:
A full height basement is located under the remaining areas of the house. This area is accessed
from an exterior door as well as an interior door from the kitchen.
Lower Level Recommendations
1. Review and repair stairs as required. Provide handrails per code.
2. Review interior mortar condition of walls. Repoint as required.
3. Repair leak at north chimney. Repoint chimney as required.
4. Review video options to provide tour viewing.
INTERIOR - MAIN LEVEL
Kitchen:
The kitchen is in its configuration from the 1940s, which includes a portion of the enclosed, south
porch. The east corner was probably always enclosed as a pantry and food preparation area for
the kitchen. In the late 1940s, the original hand pump was removed from the kitchen when the
gutters and downspouts were disconnected from the cistern as part of the reroofing project. A
porcelain cast iron sink and metal cabinet unit was located on the east wall with 'faux faucets' in
anticipation of running water. Water was carried from the well to the kitchen sink until a pressure
system was installed. The original wood burning stove is also located along the east wall. A
built-in ironing board is found on the west wall. The walls and ceiling are plaster on lath. The
upper portions of the walls have been covered with a "masonite" type product and painted,
probably to cover damaged plaster. A wood wainscot is found along the lower sections except
the area around the sink, which has a higher, tile board backsplash. The plaster ceiling has been
covered with cane fiber tiles on wood furring strips, which could have been installed prior to or
during the 1940s. The wood floor finish is worn. The interior doors, windows, trim and wainscot
are painted in the kitchen area. The north door has modem, hardware.
3
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Dining / Parlor Room:
The Holz's may have been ahead of the times by combining their dining and parlor rooms into a
"great room." The room has wood floors with plaster walls. The plaster ceiling has also been
concealed with gold -flecked, cane fiber tiles on wood furring strips. The interior wood doors are
six -panel doors with a stained finish. The interior, west porch door, has three of the panels
divided into three, omate squares. This door, also, has an etched glass window. A wood china
cabinet is built into the north wall. A bathroom was added to the southeast corner of the dining
room after the 1940s.
Bedroom:
A main level bedroom is located in the northwest comer of the house. A pair of doors enters this
room from the dining room.
Main Level Recommendations
1. Refinish the kitchen's wood floors to a standard acceptable for a 1940's farmhouse.
2. Remove the bathroom. Restore the floor, walls, ceiling and wood trim to match
Dining/Parlor room.
INTERIOR - UPPER LEVEL OF HOUSE
The upper level of the house contains four bedrooms. The interior doors at the upper level are four -panel
doors. The doors, windows, trim and wood wainscot at the stair half -wall are painted. The wood floors
are painted with rug or carpet coverings. The rooms have wall and ceiling papers with some water
damage. Rodent damage and possible contamination of plaster are a deterrent to tours or other uses of
this level.
Attic:
The access to the original house's attic is through a scuttle in the ceiling of northeast chamber
closet. The attic was not viewed.
Recommendations
1. Remove rodents, their wasted and deodorize.
2. Document wall and ceiling papers.
3. Remove (abate) damaged plaster and replace.
4. Review video options to provide tour viewing.
MECHANICAL
HVAC
The current heating system is forced air with ducts and modern grilles. The fuel oil furnace was
reported as being unreliable. The house does not have air conditioning or a humidifier.
Recommendations
1. Provide new natural gas furnace and review possible addition of main and upper
level zones. Conceal exterior venting through foundation walls and/or inactive
chimney(s).
2. Replace grilles and repair openings to match original.
3. Provide slots in floor or ceiling for HVAC openings.
4. Restore historic floor grate in Dining room with "blackened -out" duct pan.
5. Add air conditioning.
6. Provide insulated duct riser(s) from basement to attic as required for air conditioning.
7. Add humidifier.
4
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Plumbing
Modern water faucet will remain in kitchen to aid program functions. A hot water heater is located
in the basement. A septic system is located on the site and may require connection to City
sewer.
Recommendations
1. Remove plumbing fixtures and venting from bathroom.
2. Provide discreet venting of remaining kitchen sink.
3. Review house's septic system and repair or connect to City's system as required.
4. Review septic requirement if summer or all year farm animals are added to program.
Fire Protection
A smoke detection system that is linked to an alarm system is not present. An air sampling
smoke detection system and automatic sprinkler system are additional options for early fire
detection and prevention.
Recommendations
1. Provide a smoke detection system that is linked to the City or local monitoring
company.
2. Provide sprinkler system with ceiling or interior sidewall heads.
[Note: An automatic sprinkler system with ceiling or sidewall heads is highly recommended.]
ELECTRICAL
Power and Power Services
The electrical service was upgraded to 100-amp service, and a panel was installed on the west
wall in the basement. The original electrical service was located in the upper, south bedroom. A
modern telephone, currently found in the kitchen, should be relocated to a Tess obtrusive location.
Lighting
Currently, the interior and exterior of the house has a majority of original light fixtures. Lighting
upgrades dependent on program occupancy or security system that are linked to motion
detection and/or Tight sensors may enhance the interior spaces.
Recommendations
1. Review emergency and exit lighting requirements with code official. Provide lighting
as required.
2. Review and restore interior Tight fixtures that are consistent with the selected
restoration date.
3. Provide Tight controls that are concealed or in keeping with the selected restoration
date.
4. Provide mechanical controls that that are concealed or in keeping with the selected
restoration date.
5. Relocate telephone.
5
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
BARN (c. 1927 to present)
"...Old barns, furthermore, are often community landmarks and make the past present. Such
buildings embody ethnic traditions and local customs; they reflect changing farming practices and
advances in building technology. In the imagination they represent a whole way of life."
(Preservation Briefs 20 — Preservation of Historic Barns)
The Holz's barn typifies an innovative construction technique for barn design that created on -
grade access at both levels. This barn type, called a Bank Barn, is based on functional needs.
The barns are built into a hillside or a bank is created that would provide easy access to wagons
carrying hay to the upper level while the lower level sheltered the animals. Bank barns were
typically constructed with their long side parallel to the hill. The structure was often sited on the
south side of the hill/bank to give animals a sunny spot during the winter.
The original Holz barn bumed in 1927, and the existing barn was reconstructed shortly there
after. It is unknown if a portion of the original concrete foundations were salvageable. The lower
level has a concrete floor with depressions for manure troughs and stanchions for the animals.
This level is linked to an opening in the silo foundation. A wood ladder provides an interior route
to the upper level. The upper floor is constructed using wood post, beam and girt timber system.
This upper floor structure has been reinforced per SEH's structural engineer's recommendations.
The loft wood flooring system uses a ship lap joint system. The original oats bin is remaining at
the loft level as well as pulleys and other farm equipment that can demonstrate some of the
farming processes that occurred in this space. An exterior door has been added at the south
corner of the west side, upper level for emergency egress, along with a new ramp parallel to the
west side providing an accessible route into this level of the barn. The cedar shake roof was
replaced last year.
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Recommendations
1. Add lightning protection system to roof.
2. Provide galvanized, rolled roof cap to match historic cap.
3. Repair and paint board and batten siding. Repair of board and battens
should target saving the historic material by removing only sections and
replacing with Dutchman or using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
4. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible
material.
5. Review wood windows. Repair and paint as required. (Note: Replace
modern glass with historic, reproduction glass.)
6. Provide a white washing finish at the interior structures of lower level to
provide a blending of repairs with existing and to comply with 1940's Grade -A
Milking requirements. (Do NOT add salt to the white wash formula.)
7. Review thresholds and floor unevenness for safety.
8. Paint conduit at upper level to blend appearance with wood.
9. Provide tooVequipment displays at both levels.
2
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
OUTBUILDINGS
CHICKEN COOP (c. 1902 )
This structure, like the barn, is built into the hillside. The
unreinforced concrete foundation walls are on three
sides and have recently been repaired. The original
concrete mixture may have had aggregate that was not
suitable for the wall strength as well as water infiltration
may have contributed to the deterioration of the
concrete. The south wall is wood framed with
horizontal, clapboard siding and trim. The siding has
been repaired and repainted. A chicken pen has been
reconstructed using wood branches. The cedar roof
system including ventilators was replaced last year.
Recommendations
1. Review storm water route.
2. Review animal waste removal.
3. Replace fence with period woven wire fence.
STOCK TANK (1923 to present )
The tank is located south of the chicken house and is
constructed of concrete. A pipe from the well house fills
the tank. The following text 'OH 1923 Aug 31' was hand
written into the concrete cover that extends over the
north and center portions of the tank. The south portion
of the tank had a hinged wood cover that was used to
conserve heat in the winter. The cover is in disrepair.
Recommendations
1. Review concrete structure. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible material.
2. Replace hinged south cover to match original.
1
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
WELL & MILK HOUSE (c. 1941 to present)
This building replaced the windmill with pump house at
its base. Metal footings from the windmill remain around
the perimeter of the well/milk house. The well/milk
house structure is set on a concrete foundation and floor
system. The hipped roof has an asphalt shingle system
that is in good condition. The walls are wood framed
with vertical wood siding and trim. Wood windows are
located on three elevations. Two wood doors
constructed of siding material enter the spaces on the
north elevation. Concrete stoops are provided at each
doorway. A partition wall divides the interior and
separates the east well area from the west dairy area.
An electric milk cooler from the 1950s is found in the
milk area. The older, water cooler also remains along
the south elevation with an overflow pipe exiting to the
west. The pipe runs to the stock tank and into the lower
level of the barn to provide water for the animals.
Recommendations
1. Review concrete stoop conditions.
2. Remove electrical cooler. (Provide a temporary opening if required)
GRANARY WITH MACHINE STORAGE (c. early 1900s)
The north gabled portion of the granary with lean-to
grain and storage are wood framed structures set on
original stone piers as well as newer concrete block
piers. The exterior is sheathed horizontal, ship -lapped
wood siding. There are sections of siding that are
missing and/or rotted. The roofs are covered with an
asphalt shingle system that was replaced in 1999. A
concrete stoop is located at the granary entrance. The
granary has two levels with an interior wood stair. A
south addition was added in 1947 for machine storage.
This addition is also wood framed with a corrugated
metal shed roof that slopes to the west. The addition
has vertical wood siding along the east elevation and
vertical corrugated galvanized metal siding along the
south and west elevations. The corrugated metal is
showing areas of rust. A concrete foundation wall runs
along the south and west elevation where the grades
are sloping. There is no floor structure in this addition.
Recommendations
1. Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the historic
material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or using an epoxy
filler and consolidant.
2. Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by structural
engineer. Restore original piers. Provide dark screening behind piers to prevent
access below structure.
3. Review and repair metal siding and roof system.
4. Document and modify machine storage addition to protect historic oak tree.
5. Review concrete stoop conditions.
6. Provide tool displays in granary and machine storage areas.
2
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
MACHINE SHED (2000s to present)
This machine storage building is a post type structure
typical of the early 1900s with round poles. (Square
posts may indicate a structure after the 1940s.) Due to
unsafe conditions, the building was rebuilt in 2000. The
reconstruction of the building utilities some salvageable
historic material. Research was also completed to
provide a corrugated metal roof system that reproduces
the material shape available in that era.
Recommendations
1. Provide tool display.
CORN CRIB (c. 1911 to present)
The corncrib is a wood framed structure on concrete
block piers. The structure is leaning and may not be
securely attached to the piers. Horizontal wood slats at
door and window openings are painted with 'faux' trim.
Some slats are missing and/or rotten. The shed roof
appears to be a corrugated metal system but was not
observed.
Recommendations
1. Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the historic
material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or using an epoxy
filler and consolidant.
2. Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by structural
engineer. Restore original piers. Provide dark screening behind piers to prevent
access below structure.
3. Review and replace roof system if required.
GARAGE (1959 to present)
The garage is a wood framed structure with siding and
asphalt shingles. The garage is currently utilized as
storage of maintenance equipment, program material or
a repair shop for antiques. While the garage is in fair
condition, this structure was not constructed nor does it
typify a structure of the selected restoration era.
Recommendations
1. Remove garage or relocate to northwest edge of property.
2. The original grades and landscape restored to reflect 1940's appearance.
3. Provide alternate locations for storage through reorganization of antiques and displays.
3
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
HILLSIDE SHED (early 1900s to present )
WITH GAS HOUSE & HOG/SHEEP PEN ADDITIONS
One of the oldest remaining outbuildings constructed
on the site. This structure has evolved with the
changing times and livestock needs of the farm. The
original building has a gabled roof with cedar shingle
system. The building's attic was used for storage and
can be accessed from the west elevation. Wood
reinforcing members have been added to roof joists. A
concrete stoop is located at this west wood -sided, attic
door. The lower sections of the building housed
equipment as well as animals over the years. A gas
house was added to the west in the early 1940s for
tractor fuel. A south bump -out was added to
accommodate parking a 1938 Chevrolet. East of the
hillside shed, a concrete slab and foundation walls
remain from a former hog shed addition. This concrete
is deteriorated. Currently, an overhead wood screen
has been constructed on the east elevation for a
portable toilet(s).
Recommendations
1. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill cracks with compatible material.
2. Review concrete stoop.
3. Repair and paint horizontal wood siding.
4. Remove portable toilet screening
5. Document and remove concrete slab.
6. Reconstruct hog shed and pen.
7. Consider relocating garage storage to attic.
SMOKE HOUSE (1922 to present )
The wood roof has been replaced. The wood framing
and siding are set on a concrete foundation. A tree has
grown adjacent to the south elevation. A license plate is
attached also to the south elevation that provides a
cornerstone for the building, dated 1922. A deteriorated
wood door is located on the west elevation.
Recommendations
1. Repair vertical siding. Repair of siding should target saving the historic material by
removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or using an epoxy filler and
consolidant. Research original finish and provide.
2. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill cracks with compatible material.
3. Repair door and hardware.
4. Remove encroaching tree.
4
EXISTING BUILDING CONDITION REVIEWS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE FEATURES (1910 to present)
A number of historic landscape features are found at
the Holz farmstead. Small wood signs throughout the
farmstead mark some of the landscape features,
missing or present. Some of these unique features are
as follows:
The driveway with loop and post light appear to be in
original configuration. A concrete stair with metal pipe
rail lead from the house down to the barn was added to
the center of the driveway loop in 1946.
South of the fenced barnyard, a clay tile drain system is
visible. The drain tile system links to the lake and
drained wet ground to lake. A wood sign signifies the
drain tile location.
A vegetable garden, a small pond for ducks, and an
original well were also found south of the barnyard at
one time. The overall master plan proposes to restore
the vegetable garden.
A path for the milk cows was located along the west
and south sides of this lake. A gate once stood near
the rebuilt machine shed and controlled access from a
remote, day pasture area to night pasture near the
house.
After the transfer of property ownership to the City of
Eagan, the flower garden has been in the process of
being restored by volunteers and the Eagan Garden
Club. Original plant material remains as well as the
original metal gate. The historic fencing has not been
replaced.
Recommendations
1. Carefully document/photograph remaining historic landscape features. Determine
landscape items present in the 1940s and develop plan to restore these appropriate
features.
2. Remove volunteer plants and/or trees to restore perimeter of working farm.
3. Repair railing and stairs in driveway loop as required.
4. To promote self -guided tours of the farmstead, provide descriptive signage about the
historic landscape features. (Signage may include historic photographs of the
farmstead, diary accounts of farm life in the 1940's or such)
5
PROGRAM AND ACCESSIBLITY OPTIONS
PROGRAM OPTIONS
Building Reconstruction:
Three deteriorated structures were removed but would have been an integral part of farm life in the
1940s. The silo was located north of the barn and was removed in the 1970s. The concrete foundation
of the silo remains and could be the foundation of the original silo that burned in 1927. The silo pit has
recently been excavated down to the lower level of the barn. The brooder house for baby chickens and
the outhouse were located east of the house. Currently, wood markers sign the location of these two
structures.
Silo (c. 1928— 1970's)
Recommendations
1. Reconstruct the wood stave silo on the existing concrete foundation.
2. Interior of silo could be secured to prevent unwanted access.
3. Reconstruct the brooder house with pen and path from the north kitchen door.
4. Reconstruct the outhouse with path from the house.
Animals:
Currently, the chicken coop provides a year round structure for keeping chickens on the farm site. One
future program that would help create a realistic 1940's farm setting is to expand the animal population to
provide seasonal display of baby and/or young calves, piglets and/or Iambs. It was proposed that the
animals might rotate if they outgrew their structure(s) before the end of the program season. Due to
budget, it was also discussed that a paid staff position to care for the animals is probably not feasible. This
expansion of the animal program would rely on volunteer participation.
If the maximum number and types of animal(s) were determined that would be possible to display, the barn
and outbuildings could be reviewed to determine the most suitable structure(s). Next, modification would be
determined for housing, feeding and removing animal waste. A separate waste system could be required
for the animals. If petting and feeding the animals are part of the program, hand washing stations in each
1
PROGRAM AND ACCESSIBLITY OPTIONS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
building or a central station could be a health requirement. Daily maintenance needs would probably also
increase to support an animal program.
Recommendations
1. Develop a proposal for a range of animal types and numbers that the facility could support.
2. Review the animal program with the State of Minnesota's Health Department and City of
Eagan
3. Based on approved animal program, plan and update structures and utilities as required for
animal feeding, housing and waste removal.
Tool Displays:
Antique tools displays provide an opportunity to show the method of farming in the 1940s. Organizing and
creating display could also promote self -guided tours. The displays should be simple and perhaps created
from salvaged historic materials. The tools should be secured in a discreet manner that does not damage
the antiques. The display sizes could be different depending on the tool sizes that will be shown, but
uniform graphics could create a flexible, but cohesive display system. Securing the tools could reduce theft
opportunities as well as accidental misuse of the tool.
Recommendations
1. Provide secure displays for antique tools with graphics.
2. Locate the tool displays within the structure that could have housed the tool in the1940s.
3. Develop a procurement policy that provides a guide for accepting and/or refusing donations.
Crop Equipment Shelter:
There is antique crop equipment that is stored exposed to the weather near the fields. Not only is this
accelerating the deterioration of the equipment, but could also create an unsafe situation for the park
setting. It would have been typical for a farmer to construct an open pole structure to store larger
equipment. It would be appropriate to add this to the farmstead with fencing to prevent unwanted access.
The structure could be sized to shelter equipment for display as well as equipment that are operational for
field demonstrations.
Recommendations
1. Provide a pole structure with shed roof and gravel base that is located near the fields.
2
PROGRAM AND ACCESSIBLITY OPTIONS
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
ACCESSIBLITY PROGRAM OPTIONS
Accessible Route:
Currently the buildings or accessible route is not signed. MDA walked the site for a preliminary
review of the site and building accessibility routes. Accessible ramps have been constructed at
the main level, north side of the house and the hay loft level of the barn as previously noted. The
west and south entrances at the house are not accessible. Some of the outbuildings (welVpump
house, hillside shed, and granary) have concrete stoops at their entrances that would prevent
entering and maybe viewing of these buildings. The hen house is behind a fence. The machine
shop and machine storage addition have dirt floors and could be accessible. The smoke house,
future brooder house and future outhouse may or may not be accessible depending on future
paths. The master plan shows a trail development that would meet accessible requirements.
Accessible Restroom Facilities:
The existing outdoor location for portable toilets at the former hog/sheep pen location is probably
not on an accessible route. Additional portable toilets are brought to the site for large events.
Two new locations for concrete pads to accommodate portable toilets with or without screening
should be considered. One option is near a future north park entrance, and a second might be
south of the farmyard, near the play equipment. The locations should be outside the historic
farmstead area. The northern location might be incorporated into a relocated garage or new
storage structure. Depending on portable toilet location(s), a route should be designated that is
handicap compliant.
The bathroom in the house is not accessible for interior programs. This toilet room is also
recommended for removal to restore the interior of the dining room to its original configuration
during the 1904s.
Recommendations
1. Review and provide accessible route signage.
2. Review and provide accessible building and/or room signage.
3. Review accessible toilet requirements with programming requirements.
4. Provide concrete pads with or without screening on accessible routes for portable toilets.
5. Provide video taped viewing opportunityof inaccessible buildings.
6. Provide site signage that incorporates self -guided tour information.
3
LIFE SAFETY, SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE
LIFE SAFETY AND SECURITY
The scope of life safety and security can be a continually evolving target as program needs and technology
changes. Life safety includes a number of items but important to this site could be exiting routes, exit signage,
exit lighting, sprinkler systems, alarms, stairs and handrails. Compliance with legal regulations should be guided
by the City (Code Official and/or Legal Department) but with consideration of the historic farmstead character.
Entrances and accesses to all the buildings on site should be reviewed. The State of Minnesota has recently
adopted a new code called the Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (GREB). These guidelines
set minimum standards for change of occupancy, alteration, or repair of existing buildings and structures. It can
be challenging to accommodate public programs in an historic setting.
Historic fabric is fragile and often irreplaceable. Methods for preventing unwanted access to structures by
vandals and fire should be studied. Maintaining an occupied appearance of the site can be achieved through
lighting, sounds, animals, etc. Carefully placing light and/or motion sensors in the building will be helpful. Smoke
and heat detectors as well as water sensors can prevent loss of structures. Linking the detectors to an alarm
monitoring system should be an annual allocation in the maintenance budget.
Recommendations
1. Develop a life safety plan for each structure and overall farmstead
2. Budget to discreetly add sprinkler systems (wet and/or dry systems) to the house and
barn.
3. Develop a security plan for each structure and overall farmstead.
4. Develop an exterior and interior lighting plan for each structure and overall farmstead.
MAINTENANCE
To continue the stewardship progress of the Holz farmstead, diligent review of the buildings and assessment of
repairs will be required. Developing a checklist of items for annual, biannual, and monthly review will not only
lengthen the overall life of the materials but also help prevent problems from escalating to a financial burden.
Keeping the exterior of the buildings water tight and weather tight is vital. Maintenance of historic properties can
also be viewed as opportunity to plan replacement of modern materials, as repairs are required.
The use of the interiors should also be considered in the approach to maintenance. Planning the needs of
programs and displays can make maintenance easier with clearly defined paths and areas for the public versus
private. In addition, developing an acquisition policy may reduce unwanted items and prevent hiding of
maintenance problems. It may also reduce unwanted or misplaced loading of the structures that could accelerate
the deterioration of historic materials.
The National Park Service (NPS) provides publications about approaches to preservation as well as technical
pamphlets with specific instructions about methods of repairs. This information can be found under the NPS's
Technical Preservation Services for Historic Buildings, and they have published information called the 'Good
Guides.' These guides include information about approaches per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards as well
as Preservation Tech Notes and Preservation Briefs. A complete list of the forty-two Preservation Briefs can be
found at the NPS's web site `Links to the Past" (http://www2.cr.nos.gov/tps/briefs/presbhom.htm) but the following
will probably be helpful for the farmstead:
Brief 4:
Brief 9:
Brief 10:
Brief 15:
Brief 16:
Roofing for Historic Buildings
The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation of Historic Concrete: Problems and General Approaches
The Use of Substitute materials on Historic Building Exteriors
Brief 17:
Brief 18:
Brief 19:
Brief 20:
Brief 21;
Brief 24:
Brief 28:
Brief 32:
Brief 36:
Brief 39:
LIFE SAFETY, SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
Architectural Character — Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic buildings as
An Aid to Preserving Their Character
Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings — Identifying Character Defining Elements
The Repair and replacement of historic Wooden Shingle Roofs
The Preservation of Historic Barns
Repairing Historic Flat Plaster — Walls and Ceilings
Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Building: Problems and
Recommended Approaches
Painting Historic Interiors
Making Historic Properties Accessible
Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of
Historic Landscapes
Holding the Line: Controlling Unwanted Moisture in Historic Buildings
There are numbers of resources, both local and national, that are organized for preserving agriculture and historic
settings. The State Historic Preservation Office and the Minnesota Historical Society are local sources that can
provide historic photographs as well as resource contacts to address specific issues. An organization called Barn
Again! has partnered with the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Barn Again! has produced a Barn Aid
Series of specific repairs for barns from foundations to exteriors and painting.
Recommendations
1. Develop a maintenance approach and plan
2. Determine annual, biannual, or monthly inspections requirements
Vegetation and grades review
Concrete foundation review and repair
Fieldstone foundation review and mortar repointing
Masonry joint review and mortar repointing
Wood siding review and repair
Window and door review and repair
Stair and handrail review and repair
Roof review and repair
Interior conditions
3. Develop an acquisition policy
4. Research approaches as well as funding opportunities for preserving the historic
farmstead
2
HISTORIC RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Below are three lists that encompass most of the historic farmstead recommendations. The
recommendations have been divided into high priority items and than additional or program
recommendations. The high priority items should be addressed as soon as funding is available.
Preliminary budget information has been provided for these recommendations. The additional
priorities are not to be forgotten as these items focus on continuing the stewardship of the
buildings with recommendations for future building or program development. Above all, it is
encouraged that the buildings and site be documented through measurements and photographs
to prevent Toss of the existing historic information.
HIGH Priority Recommendations
BARN
1. Add lightning protection system to roof.
2. Provide galvanized, rolled roof cap to match historic cap.
3. Repair and paint board and batten siding. Repair of board and battens
should target saving the historic material by removing only sections and
replacing with Dutchman or using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
4. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible
material.
5. Review wood windows. Repair and paint as required. (Note: Replace
modern glass with historic, reproduction glass.)
6. Review thresholds and floor unevenness for safety.
7. Provide fire protection system with ceiling or interior sidewall heads.
HOUSE (Exteriorl
1. Provide gutters and downspouts to match original design and configuration.
2. Review wood windows and storms. Repair and paint as required. (Note:
Replace modern glass with historic, reproduction glass.)
3. Review security screen design and attachment to the structure at all window
openings. If the existing screen system remains, the wood frames require
scraping and painting.
4. Replace flashing and repoint mortar at chimneys as required.
HOUSE (Interior)
1. Repair leak at north chimney. Repoint interior of chimney as required.
2. Refinish the kitchen's wood floors to a standard acceptable for a 1940's
farmhouse.
3. Remove the bathroom. Restore the floor, walls, ceiling and wood trim to
match Dining/Parlor room. Remove plumbing fixtures and venting from
bathroom.
4. Provide new natural gas furnace and review possible addition of main and
upper level zones. Conceal exterior venting through foundation walls and/or
inactive chimney(s). Provide slots in floor or ceiling for HVAC openings.
Restore historic floor grate in Dining room with "blackened -out" duct pan.
Provide mechanical controls that that are concealed or in keeping with the
selected restoration date.
5. Provide fire protection system with ceiling or interior sidewall heads.
CHICKEN COOP
1. Review and regrade storm water route.
2. Repoint foundation at north elevation.
1
HISTORIC RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
STOCK TANK
1. Review concrete structure. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible
material.
WELL/PUMP HOUSE
1. Replace concrete stoops.
GRANARY WITH MACHINE STORAGE
1. Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the
historic material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or
using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
2. Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by
structural engineer. Restore original piers. Provide dark screening behind
piers to prevent access below structure.
3. Review and repair metal siding and roof system.
4. Document and modify machine storage addition to protect historic oak tree.
5. Replace concrete stoops.
CORN CRIB
1. Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the
historic material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or
using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
2. Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by
structural engineer. Restore original piers. Provide dark screening behind
piers to prevent access below structure.
3. Review and replace roof system if required.
HILLSIDE SHED W/ GAS HOUSE AND PIG/SHEEP PEN ADDITIONS
1. Remove portable toilet screening
2. Document and remove concrete slab.
SMOKE HOUSE
1. Repair vertical siding. Repair of siding should target saving the historic
material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or using an
epoxy filler and consolidant. Research original finish and provide.
2. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill cracks with compatible material.
3. Repair door and hardware.
4. Remove encroaching tree.
GARAGE
1. Remove garage or relocate to edge of property.
ADDITIONAL Priority Recommendations
BARN
HISTORIC RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
1. Provide a white washing finish at the interior structures of lower level to
provide a blending of repairs with existing and to comply with 1940's Grade -A
Milking requirements. (Do NOT add salt to the white wash formula.)
2. Paint conduit at upper level.
3. Provide tooVequipment displays at both levels.
HOUSE (Exteriorl
1. Repair deteriorated siding and trim. Paint
2. Review venting of the attic and roof.
3. Review warping of west porch floor system and provide discreet venting of
crawlspace.
HOUSE (Interior)
2. Review and repair basement stairs as required. Provide handrails per code.
3. Review interior mortar condition of basement and cistern walls. Repoint as
required.
4. Review video options to provide tour viewing of basement, cistern, and upper
level.
5. Remove rodents, their waste and deodorize attic.
6. Document wall and ceiling papers of upper level.
7. Add air conditioning with insulated ducts if required for air conditioning.
8. Add humidifier.
9. Provide discreet venting of remaining kitchen sink.
10. Review and repair or replace house's septic system as required.
11. Review septic requirement if summer or all year farm animals are added to
program.
12. Provide a smoke detection system that is linked to the City or local
monitoring company.
13. Review emergency and exit lighting requirements with code official. Provide
lighting as required.
14. Review and restore interior light fixtures that are consistent with the selected
restoration date.
15. Provide light controls that are concealed or in keeping with the selected
restoration date.
CHICKEN COOP
1. Review animal waste removal.
STOCK TANK
1. Replace hinged south cover to match original.
WELL/PUMP HOUSE
1. Remove electrical cooler. (Provide a temporary opening if required)
GRANARY WITH MACHINE STORAGE
1. Provide tool displays in granary and machine storage areas.
MACHINE SHED
1. Provide tool display.
3
HISTORIC RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
HILLSIDE SHED W/ GAS HOUSE AND PIG/SHEEP PEN ADDITIONS
1. Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill cracks with compatible material.
2. Review concrete stoop.
3. Reconstruct hog shed and pen.
GARAGE
1. Remodel garage at new location to blend with historic context or construct
new pole shed for storage. This structure might also provide screening for
portable toilets.
BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
1. Reconstruct the wood stave silo on the existing concrete foundation.
2. Interior of silo could be secured to prevent unwanted access.
3. Reconstruct the brooder house with pen and path from the north kitchen
door.
4. Reconstruct the outhouse with path from the house.
ANTIQUE CROP EQUIPMENT SHELTER
1. Provide a pole structure with shed roof and gravel base that is located near
the fields.
ANITQUE DISPLAYS
1. Provide secure displays for antique tools with graphics.
2. Locate the tool displays within the structure that could have housed the tool
in the1 940s:
3. Develop a procurement policy that provides a guide for accepting and/or
refusing donations.
LIFE SAFETY AND SECURITY
1. Develop a life safety plan for each structure and overall farmstead
2. Budget to discreetly add sprinkler systems (wet and/or dry systems) to the
house and barn.
3. Develop a security plan for each structure and overall farmstead.
4. Develop an exterior and interior lighting plan for each structure and overall
farmstead.
MAINTENANCE
1. Develop a maintenance approach and plan
2. Determine annual, biannual, or monthly inspection requirements
Vegetation and grade review
Concrete foundation review and repair
Fieldstone foundation review and mortar repointing
Masonry joint review and mortar repointing
Wood siding review and repair
Window and door review and repair
Stair and handrail review and repair
Roof review and repair
Interior conditions
3. Develop an antique acquisition policy
4. Research approaches as well as funding opportunities for preserving the
historic farmstead
HISTORIC RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY'
Holz Farm Park Master Plan
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE FEATURES
1. Carefully document/photograph remaining historic landscape features.
Determine landscape items present in the 1940s and develop plan to restore
these appropriate features.
2. Remove volunteer plants and/or trees to restore perimeter of working farm.
3. Restore and/or reconstruct missing landscape features such as the pasture
gate near the rebuilt machine shed.
4. Repair and replace fencing to reflect 1940s configuration but without barbs
and/or electrification.
5. To promote self -guided tours of the farmstead, provide descriptive signage
about the historic landscape features. (Signage may include historic
photographs of the farmstead, diary accounts of farm life in the 1940's or ....)
Program Recommendations
ANIMAL PROGRAM
1. Develop a proposal for a range of animal types and numbers that the
farmstead could support.
2. Review the animal program with the State of Minnesota's Health Department
and City of Eagan
3. Based on approved animal program, plan and update structures and utilities
as required for animal feeding, housing and waste removal.
NATIONAL REGISTRATION NOMINATION
1. Determine City and public support for nominating the Holz Farm to the
National Register of Historic Places.
2. Organize a preliminary meeting with SHPO to review the current conditions
and eligibility status of the property.
3. Contact SHPO for a list of consultants who prepare National Register
Nominations and meet with a consultant to learn more about assembling a
nomination form.
5
Historic Farmstead Budget Estimates
General Description of High Prior
B,FN
1
add lightning protection system to existing wood shingle roof. (Estimate
includes antique scroll braces and glass balls to provide historic appearance.
An electrician would provide the surge protection.)
$4,500 - 7,500
A_.f2 A\'
Provide galvanized, rolled roof cap to match historic cap, on existing wood
shingle roof.
$ 750 - $1,000
f /
Repair and paint board and batten siding. Repair o board and battens should
target saving the historic material by removin sections and replacing with
Dutchman or using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
$5,000 - 7,000
rt board and batten siding. (Estimate assumes encapsulating the lead
paint with a primer and two -coat finish system.)
$15,000 - 20,000
5
Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible
material. _ 6? CI eptc€141.6 - � _ ---
•
Review wood windows. Repair and paint as required. (Replace modern glass
with historic, reproduction glass as noted below table.) ` gogtex s
s, _ $3,500
``(--
7
Review,thresholds and floor levels for safety. (Allowance for repairs.) •`4$5,000
- $7,500
86,t.
Provide fire protection system with ceiling or interior sidewall heads.
$36,000 - $48,000
HOUSE (Exteriorl
L•
Provide gutters and downspouts to match original design and configuration
$7,500
2
Review wood windows and storms. Repair and paint as required. Review
security screen design and attachment to the structure at all window openings.
Replace security screens, or if the existing screen system remains, the wood
frames require scraping and painting. (Replace modern glass with historic,
reproduction glass as noted below table.) �' . Rr�cive Pg—e-
:-4.s,-ei
$10,000
3
Replace flashing and repoint mortar at chimneys as required. --��70k-cr
$3,000 - $5,000
HOUSE (Interiorl (V - R -er'rvittka
1
Repair leak at north chimneyepoint chimney as required. 43�
$3,000 - $5,000
C2��
C�,ff'"'
Refinish the kitchen's wood floors to a standard acceptable for a 1940's
farmhouse. Remove plumbing fixtures and venting. (. oato
$1,500 - $2,000
3
Remove the bathroom. Restore the floor, walls, ceiling and wood trim to match
Dining/Parlor room. �/'� r —_�
$10,000 - $15,000
t3� i o
o,- I
Fi,eG;1'464
1
JrProvide
(_
�°
4
new natural gas fu nace and review possible addition of main and
upper level zones. Conc: -1 exterior venting through foundation walls and/or
inactive chimn - :. '•e slots in floor or ceiling for HVAC openings.
Restore histori •or • rate in Dining room with "blackened -out" duct pan.
Provide mechanical controls that that are concealed or in keeping with the
selected restoration date. (This does not include site utility work, hazardous
material survey, interior modifications, etc.)
s
$15,000 - $25,000
P,Crovide
5
fire protection system with ceiling or interior sidewall heads.
$12,000 - $20,000
Cutting & patching for mechanical / electrical work
$10,000 - $15,000
i,,/ P 7 e-C '- /IPA ( F.--
CHICKEN COOP
1
Regrade storm water drainages.- / r'l R - el- '
$3,000 - $5,000
2
Repoint foundation at north elevation. �
C' cam,--(-
$3,000 - $5,000
STOCK TANK
1
Review concrete structure. Repair/fill exterior cracks with compatible material.
$1,500
igtiw--A ' --
WELU PUMP HOUSE
1
Replace two concrete stoops. - , /C44z
$3,000
GRANARY WITH MACHINE ORAGE
1
Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the
historic material by removing only sections d replacing with Dutchman or
using an epoxy filler and consolidant. � C'I,
$5,000 - $10,000
2
Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by structural
engineer. Restore original piers. darkscreening behind piers to
prevent access below structure.�1
$4,000 - $8,000
3
Review and repair metal siding and roof s stem. Document and modify
machine storage addition to protect historic oak tree. c
$10,000 - $15,000
4
Replace two concrete stoops.
$3,000
f -11f
CORN CRIB
1
Repair and paint horizontal siding. Repair of siding should target saving the
historic material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or
using an epoxy filler and consolidant.
$1,500
2
Review piers. Replace 'new' piers with pier system as determined by structural
engineer. Restore original piers. Provide dark screening behind piers to
prevent access below structure. (d_1--(71 � (�,�t
� r tit, '��-ll
$2,000 - $3,000
2
3
Review and replace metal roof system if required. r 2 4 s_75s
$1,200
HILLSIDE SHED W/ GAS HOUSE AND piclog3PEN ADDITIONS
1
Remove portable toilet screening. G�tero- 4,c47,
$ 500 - $1,000
2
Document and remove concrete slab. c r � . sz7
$2,000 - $3,500
SMOKE HOUSE
1
Repair vertical siding. Repair of siding should target saving the historic
material by removing only sections and replacing with Dutchman or using an
epoxy filler and consolidar�t.,Research original finish and provide.
$1,000
2
Review concrete foundations. Repair/fill cracks with compatible material.
$1,500
3
Repair door and hardware.
$1,500 — 2,000
4
Remove encroaching tree. -4 riil 07,K
$500
GARAGE W
1
Remove garage or relocate to northwest edge of property. /
$15,000 - $20,000
r /14''"
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE FEATURES
1
Repair railing and stairs in driveway loop. iri
$5,000 - $ 7,500
L(
NOTES:
1. BUDGET ESTIMATE:
The estimates above are provided only for budgeting purposes and assume 2003 costs. The
estimates are based on preliminary information and not detailed documents showing design intent.
The estimates do not include hazardous material survey costs, lead abatement costs, paint
analysis, professional fees, etc. The budgets are also predicated on completing each
recommendation independently of the next; which if grouped, a costs savings might be realized.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS:
The recommendations above are considered 'HIGH'. The order listed above does not imply that
one is more important than the other is; ALL of the above recommendations are considered an
current need. (A summary list of all historic recommendations can be found in the Historic
Farmstead Report.)
3. HISTORIC GLASS SOURCE
Available Manufacturers: Subject to compliance with requirements, manufacturers offering Historic
Renovation Glass, products that could be, but are not limited to, the following company:
Restoration Glass "Light", as manufactured by S.A. Bendheim Co., and available from by Gaytee
Glass, 2744 Lyndale Avenue S., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408; (612) 872-4550.
3
APPENDIX
RESOURCES:
Welcome to the National Register — National
Park Service
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
the Treatment of Historic Properties with
Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating,
Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings
— National Park Service
Preservation Briefs — Technical Preservation
Services for Historic Buildings, National Park
Service
The Good Guides — Technical Preservation
Services for Historic Buildings, National Park
Service
Section 106 Regulations Summary
Minnesota's State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO)
Inventorying, Managing and Preserving
Agricultural Historic Landscapes in
Minnesota, BRW, Inc., June 1999
Holz Farm Building & Property Report
(2002-1995)
Holz Farm Well Report
Holz Farm Event and Program Information
Structural Examination and Evaluation of the
Barn, Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., April
1997
Historic Holz Farm Report and
Recommendations, Holz Farm Task Force,
1995
Architectural and Structural Examination and
Evaluation for The Historic Holz Farm, Short
Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., November 1995
FARMSTEAD IMAGES:
Farm photographs from Spring 2003
,Wr t av/aM%,ornmuni/,afaiul
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction Page 3
II. Acknowledgments Page 4
III. Location Map Page 5
IV. Vicinity Map Page 6
V. Abstract Page 7
VI. Programs/Events Page 11
VII. Budget Page 14
VIII. Funding Sources Page 21
IX. Other Issues Page 24
X. Area and Holz Farm History Page 29
XI. Appendices Page 34
Neighborhood Open House Survey Page 35
Brooklyn Park Budget Page 37
Budget Explanation Page 38
Holz Farm/T Bo(cont. ent
"There are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One
is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the
grocery, and the other that heat comes from the furnace."
-- Aldo Leopold
INTRODUCTION
The City of Eagan (The City) acquired Holz Farm (The Farm) on January 1, 1995, in order to preserve one
of the last remaining vestiges of early Eagan.
In May 1995, the Holz Farm Task Force (Task Force) was formed at the direction of the City Council. Their
purpose was to explore and recommend the possibilities for utilizing the property. Members were
appointed representing varied backgrounds including education, farming and non-profit organizations.
Other members included neighbors, friends and a relative of the Holz's.
The Task Force was active. Monthly meetings planned their course of action. Subcommittees met to
research family history, area history, funding, programming and capital work projects. Several clean-up
days helped give The Farm a maintained, lived-in look. Tours of Gibbs Farm Museum, the Brooklyn Park
Historical Farm and the Oliver Kelley Farm provided the Task Force with insight into the possibilities.
The Task Force put on a neighborhood open house attended by over 600 visitors. Guests saw a glimpse of
the potential activities. There were animals in the barn, the wood stove was fired up, pictures of days gone
by were displayed, and hayrides toured the streets.
The purpose of this report is to inform the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
(APRNRC) and the City Council of the findings of the Task Force and to recommend a plan for utilizing The
Farm. The report is meant to be a vision of possibilities. It is understood that the ideas included here are
modifiable,and meant to be a long range guide.
The presentation of the report concludes the original mission of the Task Force. However, the group plans
to be intimately involved in the initial efforts to implement the recommendations. Many members are also
interested in helping with the formation of the "Friends" non-profit group. This report and the enthusiasm of
the Task Force will be the catalysts for a great new life for Holz Farm.
HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE
Joan Blasing Lee Markell - Commission Representative
Karl Drutowski Ann McCarthy
Don Holz Vivian Neiger
Patty Johnson Gordon Taylor
Rollie Johnson Ted Wachter - Council Representative
Steve Levin
C.J. Lilly - Staff
Jon Oyanagi - Staff
Dorothy Peterson - Staff
HolzFann/ntro
3
The Task Force wishes to thank the City Council and Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission (Commission) for their support and for the foresight demonstrated in
securing The Farm to preserve and protect the rich heritage of Eagan.
Eagan City Council
Tom Egan, Mayor
Patricia Awada
Shawn Hunter
Sandra A. Masin
Theodore Wachter
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Randall Ahern
Tim Callister
Guy Kolnhofer
George Kubik
Cindy Lynch (1995)
Lee Markell
Daryle Petersen
John Rudolph
David Szott
Stephen Thompson
Ken Tyler
Michael Vincent
Tom Walkington (1995)
Sherrie Wallace (1995)
Jonathan Widem (1995)
4
4.
gte
v
a co
V `
1
0
494
Lone Oak Road
Yankee Doodle Road
DIFFLEY
ilderness Run Road
Gill Road
HOLZ FARM
"e7 sera
#�
5
Drawing Title:
HOLZ FARM
VICINITY MAP
ABSTRACT
•-4.. ��,
•
4t.
7
ABSTRACT
MISSION STATEMENT
To cultivate an appreciation of farm life in. Eagan Township during the 1940's post -depression era.
OBJECTIVE
This report has been prepared to provide the City of Eagan with a comprehensive plan which will
lead to the optimum utilization of the land and buildings known as Holz Farm. To achieve this
objective, the report encourages a partnership between the City of Eagan and a yet -to -be created
non-profit group ("Friends" of the Farm) to jointly restore and operate the farm.
ACTIVITIES
In keeping with the Mission Statement, a wide variety of activities and events will be planned to
provide educational, entertaining, historical and cultural perspectives appealing to a wide range
of interests and ages. Animal demonstrations, farming practices, barn dances, soap making and
other activities will provide school group tours and visitors with hands-on experiences typical of
1940's farm life. Festivals will draw together neighbors for community -building. Crops and
animals will help communicate the reality of food sources. Visitors will be able to enjoy the
aroma of coffee brewing on the wood -burning stove while butter cookies fresh out of the oven
bring back warm. memories.
BENEFITS
Holz Farm will bridge Eagan's past and present, oldland young, and rural and urban
communities. Visitors will experience family life from the Great Depression through World War
II. The Task Force feels this era allows for flexibility in many aspects of The Farm. The
mechanized versus manual farming methods can be contrasted. For example, in 1940 electricity
was introduced to Holz Farm and the Farmall H tractor was purchased. This will allow for the
depiction of life before and after technological advancements.
The Farm will be a place where old friends gather and new friends meet. It will be a place where
youngsters of all ages will expand their horizons in a hands-on learning atmosphere. Valuable
lessons The Farm has to teach include the relationship between the chicken and the egg, the
kernel and the stalk, the tree and the wood -burning stove - lessons often left on the back burner
in today's technology era. However, these lessons give us an .appreciation of our land and of our
close dependence on it. Through the cycles of the seasons, students and visitors will appreciate
The Farm as it offers opportunities for work, play, food, joy, hardships, economic and social_ life.
Return to an age of simpler times, of open spaces and coffee on the cook stove. Return to a time
when the families gathered together and were stronger for it. The Farm will foster a commitment
to community, an appreciation of natural resources, and a knowledge of land stewardship.
Holz Farm will fill a unique niche for historic sites. Other farms in the region are centered on
periods around the turn -of -the -century or earlier. People will relate closely with the 1940's
because they, their parents orgrandparents were alive at that time. The Farm will remind visitors
of how life used to be. This relationship will create a greater availability ofresources, knowledge
and interest.
RESTORATION
An evaluationand examination of the structures has been completed by City staff and the.,,
engineering firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH). While some of the minor outbuildings are in..
poor condition, the majority of the farm structures are rated in relatively good condition. Some of
the minor repairs can be done by City forces, The Friends, and other volunteer workers.
There are capital costs to restore the buildings and to make them accessible to the public.
• All of the mechanical systems are in need of upgrading for long term, efficient service.
• The concrete, masonry and footings are in need of repair.
• Doors, windows, siding and their hardware need work.
• The roofs on all buildings will need replacement.
• The possibility of hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead base paint and petroleum
products maybe issues affecting restoration plans and costs.
Site improvements such as parking, security and accessibility will be necessary to accommodate
the public. Parking is a concern. Current access is through a residential area which has limited
parking. To preserve the character and quality of the farm, The Task Force is recommending that
,'traffic and •parking'be-:prohibited within the area immediately surrounding the buildings. A small
parking lot accommodating eight cars exists in the Holz Farm Neighborhood Park immediately to
the south.
Security is an issue to be addressed. Locks on the house and garage were vandalized on at least
three occasions in 1995. The buildings and their contents will continue to be of great value.
Access for all people will need to be provided. How extensive the accommodations need to be
will be determined by designated use of the buildings. Walkways and paths will need to be of
suitable material and grade.
METHODOLOGY
The Task Force recommends that, upon adoption of this report, The Friends of the Farm non-
profit group be formed. The goal being that The Friends will eventually take on a major role in
operating and funding The Farm. Until that comes to fruition, the City of Eagan would maintain
and operate the site along with The Friends. The Task Force recommends that the City and The
Friends sign a conservation easement to guarantee that the site, and any addition, be forever
designated as a historic farm. This would prevent the possibility of changing the utilization of the
site. This easement would be written with a land conservation agency such as the Minnesota
Land Trust.
9
As The Friends grows and strengthens, their contribution will increase; more volunteers means a
greater work force for restoration projects, a widervariety of tours and programs can be offered, .
and a capital fund drive can be coordinated entirely.by The Friends. The partnership with the
City will allow for grant applications to funding sources specifically supporting cooperative efforts.
Further, each body would be eligible for separate grants. Moreover, businesses and individuals
may be more likely to donate to a specific program like The Farm through The Friends rather than
to a municipality.
SUMMARY
The Task Force recommends that the site be restored to the 1940's post -depression era. The
programs developed will provide educational, entertaining and community -building opportunities.
The Farm will build a sense of pride in the rich heritage of our community through preservation
and presentation of farm life during Eagan's formative years. The horse drawn implements will be
in contrast with the introduction of electricity and the tractor. The effect of the Great Depression
and World War II can be demonstrated.
The Friends, in partnership with the City of Eagan, will work to restore, maintain and operate
Holz Farm. Both groups must provide resources to create a site the public will be able to access
and enjoy. The Friends will take on greater responsibility with each phase as The Farm evolves.
10
1d-4•
PROGRAMS AND EVENTS
.44r-4ro•.•,•0b..‹^4 .. r i.a••..0
J
4r
PROGRAMS AND EVENTS
Holz Farm will provide our community with an educational, cultural, and historical resource...
The Farm will offer a unique opportunity to experience rural life as it once existed in Eagan
`through events and programs•benefitting people of all ages. Activities will generate interest and
involvement in developing Holz Farm, as well as provide an opportunity to generate revenue
contributing toward operational costs.
Activities will be determined by each phase of the restoration project. The activities can include:.
• On -going activities:
• Special events:
school programs
animal demonstrations
4H programs
holidays
seasonal festivals
farmers market
ice cream and root beer making
hay rides
square dances
movie night
• Educational experiences on various aspects of agriculture and farm life:
maple syruping
bee hives
corn husking
quilting
candlemaking
canning
spring planting
fall plowing
summer farm day camp
• Historical programs related to events of the time period:
World Wars
victory gardening
social, political, ethnic and cultural eventsof the time
In 1996-97, special events will be scheduled on a periodic basis May through October. Programs
will focus on farming and outdoor activities, however; the assumption is that the barn and the
house structures will be available for limited use. Activities in 1996-97 will include:
• Gardening projects
• Seasonal harvest programs
• Arts and crafts events
• Social events (i.e. campfires, ice cream socials, pancake breakfast)
• Animal demonstrations
• Domestic arts (i.e. cooking, making candles, sewing)
• Land clearing
12
In 1997 and beyond, as more buildings are restored, the duration and range of events can be
greatly expanded. Examples are:
Farming Activities Leisure Time Domestic Arts
Egg route Tire swing Making bread
Milking Kids toys/games Smoking meats
Herb garden Quilting Canning
Animal husbandry Fishing Pickling
Corn roasting/shucking Horseshoes Jelly making
Fibers production Skating Soap making
Making apple cider Snow shoeing
Planting/harvesting Hay jump
Farm chores
Miscellaneous
Bat/bird house construction
Woodworking
Blacksmithing
Seniors' coffee
Overnight events
Schools will be provided with lesson plans for use in the classroom which will connect to a
hands-on tour of The Farm. School tours will be an essential component at The Farm as they are
at other historic farms in the region. From the tours of three sites, it was discovered that the vast
majority of visitors and revenue generated came from schools tours. The groups also filled
otherwise "down time". during weekdays.
Special events are successful bringing in large numbers of visitors. For example, Dairy Day at
Gibbs Farm saw over 2,000 people during one Sunday afternoon, Halloween events are also
popular, and Christmas on the Farm attracts those who enjoy an old fashioned holiday.
Some of the activities will include the daily and seasonal chores associated with farm living such
as planting, harvesting, painting, cooking, cleaning, clearing and feeding. Each season allows for
a whole new set of ideas enticing people back to experience the cycle of farm life.
Survey results from the September 23, 1995 Open House demonstrate great support from area
`residents: A checklist of°pos'sible activities was, included• and a•historical.museum ranked as the
highest priority. Barn dances, school tours, farming practices and live animals were next in
popularity. The survey results are an appendix item in this report.
Tours of area farms indicated that animals were a major draw. Of all the things remembered,
animals were the most popular, especially among children. Everyone loves to see, pet and feed
the animals. At the Holz Farm Open House goats, ducks, a calf, sheep, rabbits and horses
entertained guests.
The Task Force also strongly encourages that a hands-on experience is most desirable. The feeling
created is more of an immersion into life on a farm during a period of history... People feel much
more welcome and comfortable. Gibbs Farm Museum has a hands off policy except for special
activities. Oliver Kelley allowed visitors to join in on the activities of the day. Brooklyn Park
allows everyone to touch and try most everything.
HolzFarm/activiry
13
BUDGET
(
o
t�
•
ti 4-
14
BUDGET
' The attached list prioritizes work necessary for the restoration and operation of The Farm. An
'examinationand evaluation was completed by SEH and City staff. • Recommendations .are based
on those evaluations along with the Task Forces' input for utilization of The Farm..
Most of the estimates.are,based onrestoration and improvement costs. Additional items are listed
to bring the'structures up to standards for public use. The Task Force recommends that the
materials be consistent with the time period and be of high quality. Whenever modern materials
are used they must be screened from view or adapted to look like the period.
Cost estimates include possible options. For instance, the existing well and septic(or new well
and/or septic) could service the house, barn and rest rooms required for visitors. Another option is
to bring City water and sewer on the site. The cost of running lines to the house from Manor
Drive would be costly due to the great distance. A third possibility would be that if additional
property is acquired and has water and sewer connections, the visitor building with rest rooms
could be located there at Tess expense.
Another example of cost options involves the house. Use of the upstairs for displays, a caretaker's
apartment, or office space each have very different ramifications for what improvements need to
occur and how much they will cost. Additionally, since animals are housed on site, substantial
accommodations must be made for shelter, food storage, pasture area, and water.
Sources of funding are identified. The City is listed for covering some items which would come
out of the general operating budget. The Friends of the Farm group (FF) are noted for some
capital and minor cost projects. Additional land acquisition will be made possible if a bond
referendum that includes Holz Farm is successful. The park site fund is available from park
dedication fees collected from development.
'Labor sources are also noted. The primary labor force is listedbut does not solely take
responsibility. Vendor is defined as a private contractor with expertise to perform the work. City
forces designates staff to coordinate and complete those tasks. Volunteer labor will also be
utilized to complete projects. These people may come from The Friends, the community or
visitors as an actual participatory activity.
The list is prioritized and given a time frame for completion. It will help serve as an instrument for
goal setting, fund raising and careful development. Advocates will push to keep the restoration
on schedule. Specific projects will be adopted by fund providers. An orderly progression will
maintain efficient use of resources.
NOTE: A special explanation is provided in the appendix for the City Council and Commission
explaining the budget estimates that are different in this report from the SEH report they received
last fall. The SEH numbers were lowered through in -kind services projected from City and
Friends forces and by other volunteer or donated services. Two items (mechanical and electrical)
were adjusted down after checking with contractors. Keep in mind that estimates are based on
1995 dollars while some of the actual work may not commence until years into the future.
Holz Farndrestorat. ion
15
BARN
(2
0
CHICKEN COOP
WATER STORAGE
MILK & PUMP/ —
WELL HOUSE
et
ip
O
00•4
HOUSE
OUT HOUSE
Co --SMOKE HOUSE
GAS
C) �
k�eq T4:
IiOLZ FARM
BUILDING LAYOUT
STORAGE
AND HOG/
SHEEP SHED
—CORN
CRIB
MACHINE
SHED
SITE PLAN
Drawn By.
LILLY
Std. Plate #
Date:
JAN. 1996
fievistens:
16
HOLZ FARM PRIORITIZATION
High Priority 1996, 1997, 1998
STRUCTURE
TASK
1996
1997
1998
LABOR
SOURCE OF
FUNDING
House
Re -roof
$18,000
Vendor
$9,620 + contingent
City
Repair chimney
$2,500
Vendor
FF
Service furnace
$150
Vendor
City
Check electrical
system
$500
Vendor
City
New electrical
$20,000
FF
Turn on well
Volunteers
Test well water
purity (septic?)
$100
Vendor
City
Security lighting
$2,000
Vendor
FF
Doors, windows,
hardware
$1,500
Volunteers
FF
Bam
Repair roof
$45,000
Vendor
FF
Replace north
doors
$1,500
Volunteers
FF
Repair track
$250
City forcesNolunteer
FF
Refinish main
floor
$1,500
Volunteers
FF
Machine Shed
.Document/Raze
$250
City forces
FF/City
Storage/hog-
sheep shed
Remove east end
$250
City forces
FF/City
Smoke house
Document/Raze
$100
City forces
FF/Cily
Hazardous
Materials
Test items 1-7
(see SEH report)
$9,500
Vendor
City
Safety
Low level heat to
house
$500
Vendor
City
Fence around
chicken coop
$30
City forces
FF/City
Cover silo chute
City forces
Paint house &
barn
$1,400
Volunteers
City forces
FF
Purchase land,
north & west
$300,000
City
Bond
Referendum
Parking lot
$45,000
Vendor
Park Site Fund
Budget1996
Budget1997
Budget1998
Total
$34,280
$322,750
$93,000
City
$28,890
$250
$100
FF
$5,390
$22,500
$47,900
Bond
Referendum
$300,000
Park Site Fund
$45,000
KEY: City = General Operating Budget FF = Friends of The Farm
17
HOLZ FARM PRIORITIZATION
Medium Priority 1999, 2000, 2001
STRUCTURE
TASK
1999
2000
2001
LABOR
SOURCE OF
FUNDING
House
Foundation cracks
$3,000
Vendor
City
Repair porch
$1,900
Vendor
FF
Electrical system to
outbuildings
$10,000
Vendor
FF
North steps/ramp
$1,500
Vendor
FF
New furnace
$20,000
Vendor
FF
Kitchen ceiling
$1,100
Vendor
City
Wood floors
$1,500
Volunteers
FF
Lighting system -
visitors
$2,500
Vendor
City
Well/septic or City
water/sewer
$22,000
Vendor
Park Site
Fund
Bam
Foundation cracks .
$6,000
Vendor
FF/City
Electrical loft & barn
$1,500
Vendor
FF/City
Perimeter and
Livestock fencing
$20,000
Volunteers
FF
Water to barn, pens &
garden
Vendor
FF
Chicken
Coop
Foundation cracks
$600
Vendor
FF .
Roof/replace
$2,000
City forces
Volunteers
FF
Repair siding
$400
City forces
Volunteers
FF
Milk pump/
well house
Foundation cracks
$600
Vendor
FF
Repair doors
$200
City forces
Volunteers
FF
Repair siding
$200
City forces
Volunteers
FF
Granary/
machine shed
New foundation
$2,500
Vendor
FF
Lift structure from tree
$1,500
Vendor
FF
Replace roof/flashing
$3,500
Vendor
FF
Security
$15,000
Vendor
FF
Budget 1999
Budget 2000
Budget 2001
,
Total
$61,000
$34,100
$22,400
City
$11,500
$2,600
0
FF
$27,500
$31,500
$22,400
Park Site Fund
$22,000
0
0
KEY: City = General Operating Budget FF = Friends of The Farm
18
HOLZ FARM PRIORITIZATION
Low Priority 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
STRUCTURE
TASK
2002
2003
2004
2005
LABOR
SOURCE OF
FUNDING
House
Landscaping
$15,000
City
Volunteers
FF
2nd floor ceilings
$2,000
Volunteers
City
Remove bathroom
$1,500
Vendor
Volunteers
City
Heating for barn
and outbuildings
$10,000
Vendor
FF
Check plumbing
Vendor
Moot
Garage
Move or?
Vendor
Repair siding
Volunteers
City
Replace roof
Machine Shed
Rebuild
$4,000
City
Volunteers
FF
Com Crib
New concrete
piers
$200
City forces
FF
Storage - hog
shed
Remove west gas
structure
City forces
Volunteers
Remove south
addition
City forces
Re -roof
$2,000
City forces
FF
Smoke house
Rebuild?
Volunteers
FF
Brooder house
Rebuild
FF
1940's vintage
equipment and
furnishings
FF
FF
New windmill
$2,000
FF
Silo
$6,000
FF
Budget 2002
Budget 2003
Budget 2004
Budget 2005
Total
$28,500
$2,200
$10,000
$2,000
City
$1,500
0
0
$2,000
FF
$27,000
$2,200
$10,000
0
KEY: City = General Operating Budget FF = Friends of The Farm
19
BUDGET SUMMATION
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
TOTAL
$34,280
$322,750
$93,000
$61,000
$34,100
$22,400
$28,500
City
$28,890
$250
$100
$11,500
$2,600
0
$1,500
FF
$5,390
$22,500
$47,900
$27,500
$31,500
$22,400
$27,000
Park Site
0
0
$45,000
$22,000
0
0
0
Fund
Bond
0
$300,000
0
0
0
0
0
Referendum
2003
2004
2005
Grand Total
TOTAL
$2,200
$10,000
$2,000
$610,230
City
0
0
$2,000
$46,840
FF
$2,200
$10,000
0
$196,390
Park Site
Fund
0
0
0
$67,000
Bond
Referendu
m
0
0
0
$300,000
20
FUNDING SOURCES
FUNDING SOURCES
The Task Force has had general discussions regarding funding for both capital and operating
expenses. Many options were generated and will be pursued by both. City staff. and The Friends
group.
Foundation grants are sources of funding for Holz Farm. "Environmental Grantmaking
Foundations" is an up-to-date resource guide to hundreds of possible contributors. The guide
categorizes foundations under topics such as:
Agriculture
Education
Endangered Lands
Community and Local Groups
Gardens
Land Acquisition
Land Conservation
Land Use
Parks
Public Lands
Stewardship
And more!
This resource guide will prove valuable to all City departments. The public library also has a
guide to Minnesota foundations which lists several possibledonors to the Farm.
The City budget is recommended as a funding source for both capital and operational costs. The
City has an investment to maintain and improve. Through the general fund, capital investment
plan, bond referendum and other ways, the City will be called upon to provide funding to
maintain, operate and restore The Farm.
The agriculture industry can also be approached for support. Many local companies such as
dairy related businesses and feed manufacturers will identify with the activities of The Farm. Seed
companies and meat processors may also be interested in the educational and promotional
benefits for their business.
Civic organizations such as the Rotary Club, Lions Club, Jaycees and Knights of Columbus are
possible sources of funding. They are also excellent sources for volunteer labor. The World War II
era may appeal to organizations like the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American Legion.
The Friends may prove to be an attractive benefactor to foundations, businesses and individuals.
Knowing that money goes directly to a specific project or mission is a positive for some. Also,
the cooperation between the City and The Friends is encouraged by many foundations. The
Friends group will be encouraged to organize a Capital Fund Drive in order to capitalize on
community interest. Fundraising events will be conducted to earn both capital and operating
dollars. Examples might include raffling quilts, antique auctions, selling limited edition wildlife
prints, a rodeo, cow chip bingo, and/or gala banquet.
22
Daily revenue sources may come from admission fees, special events (dairy days, wedding day,
• threshing bee), souvenirs and school tours. Special programs such as Farm Camp, Halloween at
the Farm and Old Fashioned Christmas Weekends are popular at t existing historic farms. Down
the road, the possibility of private rentals may be explored.
Brooklyn Park's budget for their historic Farm is included in the appendix. At the three sites
visited; Gibbs Farm, Brooklyn Park and Oliver Kelley; .the revenue generated was approximately
33% of the expenditures. The rest was provided through either city, county or state monies
and/or grants and donations.
Private individuals are the final funding sources discussed. People with farming backgrounds,
long time Eagan area residents and others who may have a warm place in their heart for The
Farm may come through in a variety of ways. Besides dollars, valuable equipment and
furnishings may be lent or donated for use. Time and talents as volunteers, tour guides and story
tellers will be richly appreciated. Handy helpers contribute invaluably through their time and
skills.
HolzFamJ(undsou.rce
PIC
F ,'1
de. err
�I�I�r 1II
23
1
OTHER ISSUES
24
OTHER ISSUES
PARKING AND TRAFFIC
The Task Force has discussed the issue of access to the site and parking vehicles. Currently,
vehicles enter through the Manor Lake development and turn into the Holz Farm driveway.
Parking occurs along the driveway or back off Manor Drive in the neighborhood. park which has a
lot sized for eight cars. The Task Force is concerned about increased traffic through a residential
area. Also, the recommendation has been made to deny traffic and parking within the vicinity of
the buildings.
Because The Farm is a public site, access from Cliff Road and/or Dodd Road would be more
appropriate. Visibility would be increased and the Manor Lake neighborhood would be avoided.
Private parties own the land bordering The Farm to the west towards Dodd Road and to the north
next to Cliff Road. Acquisition of land to provide better public access, parking, and additional
exhibit space rank as high priorities in the list of projects to be completed. The map is provided
to show the relationship of The Farm to the surrounding properties and to Cliff Road and Dodd
Road.
Gibbs Farm had a parking lot to accommodate approximately 60 cars. Brooklyn Park had a long
lot that parked about 100 vehicles. Oliver Kelley had a large lot with a drop off lane for buses.
The Gibbs Farm director felt the lot was adequate except for two popular dates when hundreds of
cars park all around the area. Brooklyn Park felt their lot was too small. Buses must be
considered when designing any parking area. Inany scheme the parking would be designed to
handle the average sized crowd. For some special events there would need to be provisions
provided for off -site overflow parking.
SECURITY
The padlocks on the house and garage were broken on at least three occasions in 1995. Since
then, a security light was reactivated and Task Force members have been keeping watch from
their neighboring property. Nothing has been stolen or damaged to date, but the possibility of
theft, arson or vandalism causes concern.
The buildings, equipment and furnishings are quite valuable. The security of these items must be
provided. Good locks on doors and windows are essential. Discrete but effective lighting will
help deter unwanted activity. Additional security options include smoke detectors, a sprinkling
system, motion detectors (all tied into the local police department), a resident caretaker, and
video surveillance .
The Task Force has not concluded that a specific method be employed. However, that does not
mean security is not important. The issue will become more pressing and perhaps the solution
will present itself as The Farm evolves.
25
I I
IRR'13 I I, i I. I
_ I.
' I fill
r• I
I,.
c31E-.;]!'of
Tit I .
IL
.
\ 11 11 i t f Jy��! is
-r-
C\
\'\ - .. i 1 I �\ �I
\\ •,1� '� • -�I r O'I `
r 1 r t. :�..r.�.v.... ..mot
w '1>(5 v\\., -5--/6 FOOT WIDTH ,
\���. ------.1, EASEMENT
=w=a\ i k 10
NSL —
�- \;\\ 1247 f , C.I1L I NrIiEU F'PLILIf
\r1. c
..� ,,�.:5 0 , Holz
"\\\ p°'° t� ,Farms,
nrn Zf. '\ I i} Q '
} I
(� co 0 1 n:(i 21'ri .v.
iL
(I I- 0 -16 FOOT WIDTH '• 3 ��
.---Lori.,
� EASEMENT • } 1 ''�/,
i�1V l , :I._. l ( o oIz .
.- 4' I'I ,1 Farm
I l
II �� i
it nl; ,e 'i� :a !. '1 Park t=3
a I� 1 I ; r
1 I
1111 .
� ii
1/
II 1 ;17 Zb i
JI
Ir !
rawirng Title:
HOLZ FARM
UILDING LAYOU
26
:ate By:
M. MOGREN
is -
t.,
sia Plate #
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
To comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), some site improvements will be
required. Paths will need to be examined for appropriate grade and surfacing for traveling upon.
Access through doorwaysJand gates must be examined for accessibility. A ramp will need to be
-constructed •to gain access to the main level of the house.
The uses for the second floor of the farm house have been discussed. One possible use includes
having more. displays, in what once were,the bedrooms. .Another option ;would, be to create ,a
caretakers apartment. • A third idea is: to develop the rooms into sleeping -areas for a bed and
breakfast.
For all three options, a second access would need to be built to meet the Uniform Building Code
(UBC). Displays could be video taped and shown on the main floor to persons unable to access
the upstairs. Plumbing and electrical updates would be needed for the caretakers quarters and
bed and breakfast patrons.
STAFFING
The realization of programs at The Farm is dependent upon City staff and volunteers. As The Farm
gains in popularity, the City and Friends group will eventually fund a full-time director with
knowledge in programming for historic farms. The position may start working weekends through
the summer months. That may grow to a full-time seasonal position for the summer. Eventually,
the director may add part-time hours throughout the whole year until a full-time year-round
position is created.
Gibbs Farm offers programming from May through December and the director is employed full-
time all year long. Brooklyn Park has a director who works full-time May through December and
then part-time during the off-season. Oliver Kelley has two full-time staff all year.
Staff duties could include:
• Planning, implementing and evaluating programs and special events.
• Recruiting, scheduling, and supervising seasonal and volunteer staff.
• Supervising daily operations including animal care, building maintenance and farming
chores.
• Provide verbal and written reports to the public, City Council, Commission and The
Friends to update and recommend improvements.
• Coordinate fund raising, write grants, and solicit donations.
• Market the site through a variety of methods.
The Task Force realizes that staffing will be an evolutionary process. However, the quality and
quantity of programs will be related directly to the person and/or people responsible for
implementing them. A professional staff person will provide the consistency and follow-through
essential for the growth of program offerings on The Farm. Volunteer efforts are vital for The
Farm's success. However, the day-to-day leadership must be provided by a professional for a
consistent and coordinated effort.
27
ADVERTISING/MARKETING
The Farm is a pretty good secret at this time. Asprogramming and restoration get underway,
interest will peak and word will spread. The various forms of advertising will progress along with
the growth. There are also some methods which will need to be in place to begin securing
donations and funding.
Programs and events will be advertised in the City of Eagan quarterly brochure that features both
."Experience. Eagan",and "Discover Us" sections.. The season's events are highlighted concerning
all of the parks and recreation programs.for youth, families and. adults. The brochure is inserted
in the Eagan Sun Current newspaper and distributed to most households in Eagan.
Various brochures will be created. A fund-raising brochure will be developed early in order to
assist these efforts. The contents would demonstrate the need and explain the benefits to
potential contributors. A wish list could be included to focus attention on specific items or
projects.
A general activity brochure will be created to provide an overview of the facilities and programs
for visitors. The focus of this piece would be towards providing general information concerning
hours, costs, and overview of programs and events. This will be a high quality brochure to be
used for several years.
Specific flyers will highlight special events and the upcoming programs. These will be seasonal
and address a target market such as schools, gardeners, families, teens, older adults and history
buffs.
The local newspapers will be utilized for informing area residents of the happenings at The Farm.
Press releases, stories and photos are interesting ways for those in the area to learn about the
variety of activities occurring through the seasons.
When The Farm is restored and most of the dreams are realized, the site will become an
attraction for visitors beyond the immediate area. The Convention and Visitors Bureau along with
the Chamber of Commerce will be allies promoting The Farm as a tourist site.
Holz Farrn/ot heriss. ues
28
AREA
AND HOLZ FARM
HISTORY
'Mapof
MENDOTA and EAGAN
Oi
Tom°shibl c7
teex, xl i /•,.,M,xa
11 , COI Pep41 PIPPOT.0
Townships 77 and 28 North,
wRange 23, West of the 5th P. hi
.l R..sw .lama thee. Omar rhea. the.:
Di..ri... • 2 Gruwr •. ..
'•l• ••Ott Grpnsi.. Limit. e( Go.. .b... Jaw r•-.....,,_„�
BURNS VILLE
Mau to
.5..
a.
Kenneally
• Est
1a iso.
JarneS ,a
Scott tm°
50. �^
Ae9. rrapp
etat
Andrew (tl9
LEBANON
.cT
0
.444
Aal:er
C. Schu He
8
rr.ed rich S
Rahn.
a.
•fo.y
R.
Ktnneally
R0. 1".
•A::PotA9..
Albert 5c h mid!
Ma9 c Rahn
so
so.
C r11 •
Taylor
ran•
netsel
C ton
eo.
Cannlnp�
f0 b
garner
so
.rank Sal!
SG Meets
So.
nit'rtney
o eei ler.
RAMSE
Ptio:knall
C M.
Burns
E.0
Delver.
rS9 9e
ua9 en
!rtD +
La 9kne< ,
C
A l' . IJ. F. r<o.
ran me<f
g� ,x,. Dana..
Ar 6
s °pb 5,40. R0e11er
Sfan 2W.
aft
Srh tlana
to.
•
nyn eAa
]Srx
A. Riles,
so
Cat ,er.rfe
rank
, si°chs
Nc
D.m in
era
ua Mal
n. •
Fred Maio
refer
dela
r.k
oerk.
106
s Jankee
:fa
Cartons
TWR ROSEMOUNT 7WP
J
a
F•
N
D:
r
5
circa 1910
30
TIMELINE
1837 Louis Martin arrives to teach farming at Black Dog Creek Indian Village on
the Minnesota River.
1854 Congress extends land pre -exemption to the Minnesota Territory. The area
is quickly settled.
1855 to 1856 Land grants were made throughout the area for $1.25 per acre.
1858 Minnesota achieves statehood.
1861 Eagan Township established.
1868 Wilhelm Holz immigrates to the United States from Germany.
1870's Wilhelm and Elisa Holz move to Eagan from Pennsylvania. Settled on 80
acres in section 24 and ran a blacksmith shop.
1899 Otto Holz Sr. establishes a homestead on 220 acres in section 36.
1902 Otto Holz Sr. marries Louisa Rahn and raise four children; Elsie, Hugo,
Otto Jr., and Hertha.
1911 Existing farm house was built.
1926 Local phone service arrives to The Farm.
1928 Existing barn is constructed after fire destroys the previous one.
1933 Otto Holz Jr. marries Ella Trapp
1938 Otto Jr. and Ella Holz purchase The Farm for $5,500.
1940 Electricity comes to The Farm.
1940 The Farmall H tractor is purchased.
1947.Otto Jr. and Ella Holz satisfy the mortgage.
1993 Otto Jr. and Ella Holz pass away within two weeks of each other.
1995 The City of Eagan purchases Holz Farm.
HolzFarmltimeline
31
AREA AND HOLZ FARM HISTORY
The first white settler, Louis Martin, came to the area as part of an 1837 treaty to teach the
Mdewakanton Sioux farming at Black Dog Creek Indian Village on the Minnesota River. Land .
clearing for farming slowly 'gained momentum in the area as mostly poor farmers arrived and
began tilling the soil in the hope of claimingthe land:.. In 1854 Congress.passed a lawextending
-,land pre-emption to the•Minnesota Territory. In the years 1853 to 1856 the area was quickly
settled. During 1855 to 1856, land grants were made throughout the region for $1 .25 per acre.
The Holz Farm (located in Section 36) was originally set aside for government ownership as
"school trust fund land" and was not sold for some time. Proceeds from the sale of land so
designated went, into a fund which is still distributed to public school districts.
Wilhelm and Elisa Dehrer Holz settled in Eagan in the 1870's. Wilhelm (1848 - 1935)
immigrated to the United States from Germany in 1868. Elisa (1853 - 1933) was a native of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The Holz family originally settled on 80 acres (in Section 24) and ran a blacksmith shop in
Wescott. They raised seven children including son Otto; who established a homestead in 1899
on 220 acres (in Section 36). Otto (1880 - 1964) married Louisa Rahn (1882 - 1959), in 1902.
They raised four children: Elsie, Hugo, Otto Jr. and Hertha. All of the children were born at
home.
What is now Holz Farm was bought and sold several times until Wilhelm and Elisa Holz
purchased it in-1893: 'The property was sold to Otto and Louisa Holz Sr. in 1909 and Otto Jr.and
Ella purchased it in 1938. Otto Jr. and Ella Holz Lived on and worked the farm until 1993. In
the late 1970's, a portion of the farm was sold and was developed as South Oaks. Prior to the
sale the land was used to pasture the dairy cows. The portion of the Farm that is now the Manor
Lake Addition was sold in the early 1970's and late 1980's. That area of the Farm was used for
crops.
The 1940 farm entrance wound southeast from the farmhouse to the present intersection of Manor
Drive and McFadden's Trail and then turned directly eastward out to South Robert Trail. The
long farm entrance extended through the cultivated fields. Farming in the area consisted of dairy,
poultry and hog farming. The cattle were pastured. The Holz's raised corn, hay and oats and
had strawberries, raspberries and apples. Otto Holz Jr. practiced conservative traditional farming
methods and used horses as late as the mid-1950's.
The farm was the primary source of earning a living. Otto Sr.also did carpentry work, building
the existing house in 1911. The family relates that Otto Sr.also performed some blacksmithing.
Otto Sr.was active in Eagan Township concerns, serving as the town road overseer for 18 years.
He also was Director of Eagan Town Mutual Fire Insurance Company for 30 years.
Farm life in the teens and 20's was self -sustained. The Holz's, as did other farmers of the time,
provided their own food. A large vegetable garden was planted and harvested. Crops such as
corn, oats and hay were grown to feed the livestock. Hogs provided meat for the family in the
form of homemade ham, bacon, bratwurst and blutworst. Onions were a cash crop. Cash also
came from selling milk and cream. Eggs often were used as barter for commodities such as flour
and sugar. Various forms of fruit preserves and sauces were made from homegrown apples and
raspberries and from peaches which were purchased.
32
The extensive flower garden was begun during this period. Of interest today are the buttercups
brought to Eagan from Pennsylvania in the 1880's.
Otto Jr. (1906 - 1993) stayed on at the "home place" and worked the farm with his parents. In
1933 he married Ella Trapp (1907 - 1993). The young couple lived on the farm with the older
generation. In 1938 Otto purchased the farm for $5,500.00. The mortgage was satisfied in
1947.
Electricity became available in 1940. 'The,impact included improved water. pumping.'capabilities,
'forthe cattle first, later into the house. A refrigerator and washing machine were major
conveniences forthe home. The wood -burning stove remained an integral part of the home.
Visitors were always offered a cup of egg coffee and something fresh out of the oven.
The Farmall H tractor was purchased in 1940. Horses were still used to plant corn, mow and
rake hay. During this transition period some farm implements were converted to tractor use by
shortening the pole to be attached to the tractor draw bar.
During the 1940's, the Holz's owned a small herd of Guernsey cows and "shipped milk" to the
Twin Cities' Milk Producers Association, a creamery. Stricter sanitation codes came into being
(the Holz's chose not to modernize) limiting the Holz dairy operation.
World War II altered life for everyone including the Holz's. Gopher Ordinance (a munitions plant)
employees drove from St. Paul to Rosemount passing Holz Farm along the way. The traffic
created rush hours and made it difficult to cross South Robert Trail and get to their farm land to
the east. The rationing of gas and the need for metal altered farming practices. Also during World
War II;. Otto was an air.raid .warden.' -+Assignments such asthese,were typical in rural areas in
close proximity to munitions plants, airports and the like.
Otto Jr. earned money by trapping mink, muskrat and raccoons. The pelts were sold to Rose
Brothers Furriers in St. Paul. Occasionally, the furs brought in more money than the milk.
Otto Jr. and Ella died within two weeks of each other in 1993. They are buried in the Trinity
Lone Oak Church cemetery. The Farm was sold to a developer and then purchased by the City in
1995.
The research for the history section was compiled from several sources. Don Holz contributed
much.of'the family history notes. Karl Drutowski.searched. through officialrecords for area history
information. The "Lone Oak Years: A History Of Eagan, Minnesota", 1985, Viking Press,
was a great resource and will provide useful information for future programs, events and displays
at The Farm.
holzfarm. drft.1
33
APPENDICES
s r"Z
"
1
HOLZ FARM SURVEY RESULTS
September 23, 1995
Neighborhood Open House
Check any of the following activities you would like to see offered at Holz Farm:
72% Historic Museum
59% Barn Dances
58% School Tours
55% Farming: Past to Present
52% Live Farm Animals
50% Harvest Festival
49% Picnic Area
47% Holiday Theme Events
42% Nature Programs
40% Walk/Bike Paths
39% Farming Demonstrations
33% Fishing Dock
32% Gardening Seminars
27% Country Cooking
26% Blacksmithing
24% Private Rental
20% Community Garden Plots
20% Antique Auctions
18% Gift Shop/Store
16% Bed and Breakfast
10% Cultural Arts Center
10% Teen Dances/Concerts
10% Entertainment
8% Teen Center
5% Meeting Space
1% Doctor's Buggy Rides
1% Horseback Riding
1% Storytelling
1 % Sponsor an Animal
My concerns include:
39% Traffic
34% Security
34% Parking
26% Cost of Improvements (impact on taxes)
20% Noise
14% Accessible Days/Hours
13% Cost of Activities/Admission
7% Smell of Animals
1 % Keep it close to the original
1 % Please gain access from Cliff Road
1% Couple of activities a year; keep it small, keep it up
35
The City of Eagan should use Holz Farm for:
(Number of times mentioned)
6 Teaching children about farming
4 General Public
4 Restoration/Living History
4 Historical Marker/Site
2 Working Farm
2 Museum
1 Community Involvement
1 Nature Center
1 Farm related experiences for all ages
1 Living history/recreation
1 Special Events
1 Learning experience/organic farming
1 Cultural learning, holiday events
would be interested in:
(Number of people indicating)
24 Volunteering
17 Special Events
13 Clean-up Days
7 Carpentry/Handyman
5 Donating Goods/Services
4 Teaching
3 Gardening
1 Task Force
Holz Farm/survey.f95
36
Brooklyn Park Historical Faun
Operating Budget 1995
Expenses
Personal Services:
Coordinator $24,000
Benefits at 24% $ 5,760
Tour Guides $11,000
Benefits at 10% $ 1,100
SUB TOTAL
Supplies:
Program supplies
Animal supplies
Building maintenance supplies
Grounds supplies
SUBTOTAL
$ 1,500
$ 800
$ 3,000
$ 200
Contractual Services:
Utilities/Electric $ 3,000
Telephone $ 600
Program services $ 1,000
Animal care $ 200
Printing costs $ 1,000
SUB TOTAL
Other:
Staff training/workshops
Dues to organizations
SUB TOTAL
$ 250
$ 150
$41,860
$ 5,500
$ 5,800
$ 400
TOTAL YEARLY OPERATING BUDGET 1995 $52,410
Brooklyn Park Historical Farm
Revenue Budget 1995
Revenue:
School Tours $ 9,000
Private rentals, parties, etc. $ 200
Living History Events $ 2,000
Old Fashioned Norwegian Christmas $ 1,900
Halloween at the Historical Farm $ 2,500
Craft and Hobby Classes $ 200
Pioneer Camp $ 700
Old McDonalds Farm Camp $ 1,500
Art at the Farm $ (in art budget)
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE 1995 $18,000
37
ADJUSTMENTS OF SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON (SEH) COST ESTIMATES
BY THE HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE
The estimates provided in the November 6, 1995 SEH examination and evaluation of Holz Farm.
have been adjusted by the Holz Farm Task Force. The Task Force is assuming in -kind services
will be provided for by the City, The Friends andothervolunteer sources. The recommendations
also include lower estimates on mechanical and electrical work after consulting with contractors.
SEH
TASK FORCE
BUDGET
1. General Conditions $7,000 $0
2. Demolition/Concrete/Masonry 20,000 15,400
3. Metals/Carpentry 10,000 *13,900
4. Doors/Windows/Hardware 3,000 1 ,500
5. Roofing/Sheet Metal 15,000 *70,500
6. Finishes 12,000 4,400
7. Mechanical 58,500 30,000
8. Electrical 57,700 30,000
9. Hazardous Materials 9,500 9,500
$192,700 $175,200
* The Task Force added funds to cover all of the buildings and grounds. SEH focused mainly on
the house and barn in their estimates.
HolzFarmiseh
38
o`z
IIIu
No. 103-1/2L
HASTINGS, MN
LOS ANGELES-CHICAGO-LOGAN, OH
MCGREGOR TX -LOCUST GROVE, GA
U.S A
WILLIAM HOLZ RESIDENCE 1g7
L To R. William Holz Sr. Margaret Holz Rahn, Otto Holz Sr.
Julius Holz, Edward Holz,.Mra Eliza Holz and
William Jr.
Driver on buckboard with horses (hired Man)
William Holz family on original
family homestead near what is now
Wescott and Hwy. 149.
THE WILLIAM HOLZ SR. FAMILY
William Holz Sr. came to the United States in the 105701s
settling in Eagan before MO. Buying eighty acres of land
in section 24, he established a blacksmith shop in Westcott.
His trade had prepared him to repair farm equipment and to
sharpen tools for hie neighbors in the country side:
William Holz Sr. married Eliza nee Dreher, she was
born in Pittsburgh, PA. They were the parents of William
Holz Jr. Born May 19, lsg6 in Fagan. Anna (nee Sell) was
born July 25, 18590. William Holz Jr. and Anna (nee Sell)
are the parents of Agnes Holz Polzin, Mrs. Albert (Dorothea)
Kirchener and Mrs. Kenneth (nee Ann L.) Jacobson.
`William Holz Sr. was .a founding father of the Lone Oak •
Trinity Church in 1g 0.
-parents are
Agnes (Holz) Polzin-s paternal great grand / William
•
Holz Sr. and Eliza nee Dreher. Agneses' maternal grand
parents were Frank Sell Sr. and Bertha (nee Rahn) Sell.
Her paternal aunts are Mrs. Carl (margaret) Rahn, Mrs Ber—
thold (Anna) Darson, and Mrs. William (Emma) Braun. Paternal
uncles are: Otto Holz Sr., Edward and Julius Holz.
Agnes (Holz) Polzin's maternal aunts are Mrs. John (Adela)
Fransm.ier, grs. Charles (Louise) Pahr. Her uncle are, Henry,
Charles, William, Walter, Fred,'! ruin and Prank Sell Jr.
Anna ( nee Sell) Holz died November 13, 1969. William
Holz Jr. Died September 19, 1976. Both are interned in the
Trinity Lone Oak Church Cemetery in Eagan, Minnesota.
Pef: Agnes (Holz) Polzin
Francis J . Demb roeki
to developers
farm as feed for horses, cattle,
chickens and other livestock.
Their only sources of income
were a small herd of dairy cattle
and a weekly egg route. Their
dairy production ended several
years ago when small operations
became less profitable, but the
Holzes maintained the egg route
until quite recently.
On their egg route the Holzes
drove north along Highway 3 into
West St. Paul, stopping in
neighborhoods and delivering
eggs to individual homes. Their
business grew by word of mouth.
At the peak of their business the
Holzes had about 100 customers
and delivered as many as 40
dozen eggs to one tavern. Income
earned on the egg route was used
to buy groceries. "If you didn't
have many eggs one week, you
didn't have many groceries,"
Ella said.
Other than groceries, the
Holzes didn't buy much of
anything. One major purchase
was a tractor to replace their
horse-drawn farm equipment. Ot-
to bought his International trac-
tor new in 1940. It is still going
strong, original tires and all. "I
called down for parts the other
day, and the parts man couldn't
believe we still had it," Elia said.
During the late 196Qs and early
1970s, the Holzes sold the last of
their cropland and more or less
retired from farming. With pro-
perty taxes increasing all the
time, they decided to sell the land
north of Cliff Road first. This pro-
perty was quickly developed into
the South Oaks neighborhood.
Three years later, the Holzes
decided that they only needed the
land containing the house, barn
and garden, so they sold the rest
of the property and the lake south
of Cliff Road.
This land was farmed for many
years until being considered for
development in 1986. This first
plan was abandoned when South
Oaks residents voiced strong op-
position to a commercial zone at
the corner of Cliff Road and
Highway 3. This relieved the
Holzes very much. "They wanted
to put a cul-de-sac in our front
yard, right about where the wind-
mill is," Elia said.
It didn't take long for a new
developer to come along, how-
ever, and construction has
already started on a new develop-
ment of single-family homes call.
ed Manor Lake Estates. Although
the land immediately surroun-
ding the Holzes will not be devel-
oped until "we're carried out or
until we give in," they still don't
approve of the construction. "We
don't like to see our farm go up in-
to houses," Ella said. The land
isn't really theirs, of course, but
to them it always will be. "We
stopped at the mailbox the other
day, and I looked there and seen
all the big machinery sitting
there," Ella said. "I got a big
lump down in my stomach."
But Otto and Ella don't want to
seem too old-fashioned. At a city
council meeting, Ella said that
"he (the developer) said we're
both over 90 years old, and we're
the kind of people that don't want
to see progress."
They object to being character-
ized that way, but they also ob-
ject to some types of housing
developments. They don't like to
Photo by RoxAnne Kruger
THE HOLZES maintain,a portion of their original homestead, but land developers
are encroaching.
see developments that have
houses packed too closely toge-
ther. "Some places you can reach
out the window and shake hands
with the next house," Ella said.
The Holzes also have some
regrets about the development of
Eagan in a broad sense. "The
scenic places are all gone now.
All the trees are gone," Otto said.
Having more people in Eagan
also means that the Holzes have
more friends Jhan ever, literally
hundreds of them. Hardly a day
passes when someone doesn't
stop by just to Say, "Hello, how
are you doing?" They have a
tradition that whoever enters the
house has to put his or her name
on that day on the calendar. Dur-
ing the busiest month to date the
Holzes had 119 visitors, "and that
doesn't include the people that
didn't come inside," Otto noted.
During the summer, many of
the visitors stop by to ask about
their massive garden.
Otto and Ella know that some-
day they will be gone, as will
their yellow house with its stain-
ed glass, antique furniture and
fine woodwork.
'The developer has first rights
to buy their property, something
he must do before development of
the land can be completed. But
don't count them -out just yet.
Even though the rest of "their"
land is being developed, they are'
going to hang on to what they
have. "He wants us out of here
because it would be easier to
develop," Ella said. "No way are
we going."
Why should they? In the next
year or two they will have hun-
dreds of new neighbors, which
means the possibility of hundreds
of new friends. That means that
they have to keep the garden up
and the house should be painted
and....
EDITOR'S NOTE: Zac
Wortman, a former Eagan
resident, is a journalism
student at the University of
Minnesota.
churc
Iwo events .set at Mary, Mother
A concert for children and a
:,'hristmas arts and crafts fair
will - be held this weekend at
'Mary,. Mother of the Church, 3333
.:;liff Rd., Burnsville.
The Sunshine -Band, 'featuring.
Michael Otte, Julie Barach and
Bruce Menier, will perform two
shows Saturday, Dec. 5 at 1 and
2:15 p.m.
The arts and crafts fair will be
from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday
and from 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. Sun-
day, Dec. 6. More than 50 partici-
pants will be selling small gift
items,handmade crafts and bak-
ed goods. Proceeds will go to the
Community Action Council pro-
gram Armful of Love.
Cedar Ridge
'plans bazaar . -
Cedar Ridge Christian Church, "•
2024 Rahn Way, 'Eagan, will host
a Christma's boutique "and bake
sale Saturday, -Dec. 5 from 9
a.m.-5-p.m.
Free coffee'aiid. cider will be_
served. For more. information, -
call 688-0246.
•
Berean Baptist
- to host speaker
on teen-age suicide
A nationally known authority.
and speaker on the subject of.teen
suicide and problems of contem-
porary .youth will . speak' at
Berean Baptist Church, Burn-
. sville, Dec. 2.
'_ Jerry Johnson`: will make:a
special one-night appearance at
the church to discuss: theemo-
tionally charged issue of teen
suicide. The event is free to the
public.
The church is located at 309 E.
Co. Rd.. 42, Burnsville: For more
information, call the church at
432-7168.
Hosanna moves
back to. church
•
Hosanna Lutheran Church,
15601 Maple Island -Rd., Burns-
ville, will hold .two worship ser-
vices in its new 500-seat sanctu-
ary at 8:30 and 11 a.m. Sunday,
Dec. 6. There will be trumpets,
choirs and a celebration of Holy
Communion.
Winter quarter of Sunday
school for 3=year-olds through
grade 12 will also begin that day
in the new education wing.
Hosanna was holding Sunday
morning activities at Lakeville
'High School during construction.
of the addition. Dedication cere-
monies.are scheduled for Feb. 7.
•
Aglow Fellowship
will meet Dec. 8
Women's Aglow Fellowship
will meet Tuesday, Dec. 8 at 9:15
a:m. • at Richfield Bank & Trust,
14201'Grand Ave., Burnsville.
The program will include a free
holiday brunch and, special'
Christmas music. .
Baby-sittingis.available for a
nominal fee.. at Prince of Peace
Lutheran Church. For informa-
tion, call 890-1553.
Berean women
to hold breakfast
• Berean Baptist Church's
Women to Women Ministries will
hold a Chrsitmas breakfast
Saturday, Dec. 5 from 8:30 to 11
a.m. in the Garden Court of the
Radisson South *Hotel, 7800 Nor -
mandate Blvd., Bloomington.
The annual breakfast is design-
ed .to give participants a mean-
ingful perspective. of Christmas.
For information and reserva-
tions, call the church at 432-7168.
Shepherd students
to perform program
"The Value of Advent" will be
presented Wednesday, Dec. 2 at 7
p.m. by the children of Good
Shepherd Lutheran School, 1301
E. Co. Rd. 42, Burnsville.
For information, call the school
at 432-5527. •
V
5 eio7 29, f
Shown on ri cIt4re :
CS ricnil Zc, W i !�; 4" ®'. f-4/z,7'4e'
al e 6 /a c,esv th
&r&'dn,tit-/ism #c/2-, %/d7
Wi ftia`n oZ a.f7exele.a47/r
at e o7 /
Zl 74 rPit (a r!)
01t, No /, Sv.
rx- r
Z # /
rr/iu.s ///2.
1Vo f"e: k),,a Ogle r fIio lcI)PPrsh'4)
ll4CL Ch,,»t.,[ t j l/i• a 01) (J -4 arf
were. 4orrl 37474er 1-4 i S p/Cita re
was let-,eeii.
MzdT Iie fy %S ti-heao0,?.