No preview available
 /
     
Document - Historical information/data - Parks and Recreation System Plan for Eagan (472 pages) - 1/1/1995city oF c!cuqclrl Prepared by 11111/atIRTICIINI-ASSCINfinaakiNI MSSOC/ATIES in association with Resolution, in4 .and John Schulz Phd CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Residential: ❑ E - Estate ❑ R-1 - Residential Single Family ❑ R-2 - Residential Double ❑ R-3 - Residential Townhouse ❑ R-4 - Multiple Commerc lal: ❑ LB - Limited Business ❑ NB - Neighborhood Business El GB - General Business RB - Roadside Business CSC - Community Shopping Center El RSC - Regional Shopping Center Industrial: ❑ Business Park El RD - Research & Development 1-1 - Limited Industrial Other: ® PD • Planned Development P - Public Facilities P- Parks ❑ A - Agriculture FP - Rood Plain Water ❑ night -of -way TOTAL: Parcel Boundaries N Zoning Designation Boundaries E6007AAa . The tunic. snap Phan 1812) 341-9274. ACRES: PCT.: 80.92 0.38% 3552.78 16.53% 48.97 0.23% 256.78 1.19% 430.31 2% 71.66 0.33% 47.64 0.22% 54.29 0.25% 40.39 0.19% 182.04 0.76% 0.00 0.00% 118.36 0.66% 221.5 1.03% 2017.78 9.39% 3782.41 17.6% 837.84 3.9% 2284.53 10.63% 1309.23 8.09% 1126.12 6.24% 1366.12 6.36% 3667.3 17.06% 21474.88 100.00% City of Eagan - Zoning Map alti1i11Pagaill it. a . .11 SWIM s .opt_ 11111Mv4,nnnn.mr m > �• ssesisof N Ordinance Number 221 C/ty of Eagan Zoning Map Approved by the Eagan City Council June 18, 1996 O 1000' 2000' 3000' 4000' 5000' 6000' O 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 Mile The Zoning Designations on this map are a representation of a combination of maps and ordinances which make up the complete City of Eagan Zoning Regulations. All Zoning Designations are subject to change. Information on each Planned Development (PD) is available at City Hall. City of Eagan Community Development Department Telephone: (612) 681-4695 V op wormal 11gwg1nll'r� mr1h"C tkam, ratatto isr1714" City of Eagan Map Reprinted on 10/21/96 City of Eagan - Comprehensive Plan Map "uiplllliJI■i 1ftliP q ' I llh'♦11Ilr1l if' 4 AN _�4. _-r. ► P • ;i!!t'I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Residential: ❑ RR - Rural Residential ❑ D-1 - Single Family (0-3 units/acre) ❑ D-11- Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre) 0-III - Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) D-IV - Mixed Residential (12+ units/acre) Commercial: 0 LB - Limited Business NB - Neighborhood Business la GB - General Business ▪ RB - Roadside Business ▪ CSC - Community Shopping Center CPD - Commercial Planned Development D CA - Central Area Industrial: ❑ 1-1 - Limited Industrial ❑ RD - Research & Development Dther: El PF - Public Facilities. 0u asl-Public �P - Parks 0 Water 0 Right -of -Way TOTAL: 1 Parcel Boundaries N Land Use Designation Boundaries r City Limits ACRES: PCT.: 100.07 4688.03 1901.2 509.29 299.03 192.07 106.76 34.82 15.49 121.99 918.76 665.77 0.47% 21.81% 8.85% 2.37% 1.39% 0.69% 0.5 % 0.16% 0.07% 0.57 % 4.27% 3.1% 2558.79 11.91% 50.24 0.23% 792.83 3524.04 1361.87 3843.95 21484.79 3.89% 16.4% 6.34% 18.98% 100.00% 11/2/1995 0 1000' 2000' 3000' 4000' 5000' 6000' 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 Mile The Land Use Designations on this guide plan should be interpreted in Tight of the accompanying text and policies contained in the complete City of Eagan Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Designations are subject to change as pert of the City's ongoing planning process. City of Eagan Community Development Department Telephone: (612) 681-4695 E0002AAX- Map Design by Jewry Hay* - IIW e& gapping & Demnanphke, Inc Phone 1e 1217ea-4234. .city of cciqcin Prepared byOARTON-A$CHMAN ASSOCIATES in association with Resolution.lnc.and John Schulz Phd • • • PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN EAGAN, MINNESOTA Prepared for: The Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. in association with Resolution, Inc. and John Schultz, Ph.D. January 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following individuals contributed to the preparation of this planning study. Manor and City Council Tom Egan Patricia Awada Shawn Hunter Sandra Masin Ted Wachter Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Lee Markell, Chair Theodore Billy George Kubik John Rudolph David Szott Stephen Thompson Ken Tyler Sherie Wallace Jonathan Widem Michael Vincent City Staff Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation John VonDeLinde, Superintendent of Parks C.J. Lilly, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator Consultant Team Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Resolution, Inc. John Schultz, Ph.D. • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Executive Summary 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Characteristics and Demographics 3. Inventory of Existing Park System Facilities 4. Standards and Classification 5. Needs and Demands Analysis 6. Recreation Programs: Review and Analysis 7. Natural Resources 8. Trail System Plan 9. Recommendations for System Policies 10. Land Acquisition and Facility Development 11. System Funding and Financing 12. System Vision Statement APPENDIX LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 Population Growth 1940-2000 2-3 2.2 Housing Starts 2-4 2.3 Housing Starts by Type 2-4 2.4 1990 Population by Age 2-5 2.5 1990 Age Group Comparisons 2-6 2.6 1990 Age Group Comparisons 2-6 2.7 Racial Composition 1990 2-7 2.8 1990 Individual Living Arrangements 2-8 2.9 1990 Household Size 2-8 2.10 Housing Inventory 2-9 2.11 Age of Housing 2-10 2.12 Length of Residence 1990 2-10 2.13 Monthly Rental Payments 1990 2-12 2.14 Occupied Housing Value 1990 2-12 2.15 Household Income 1989 2-13 2.16 Household Composition 1990 2-14 2.17 Park Planning Districts 2-17 2.18 Planning District Age Groups 2-21 2.19 Planning District Households 2-22 2.20 National In -Line Roller Blading 2-23 3.1 City of Eagan Park Facilities 3-3 3.2 Barbara Curry Park 3-7 3.3 Berry Patch Park 3-9 3.4 Blackhawk Park 3-11 3.5 Bridle Ridge Park 3-13 3.6 Bur Oaks Park North 3-15 3.7 Bur Oaks Park South 3-17 3.8 Captain Dodd Park 3-19 3.9 Carlson Lake Park 3-21 3.10 Carnelian Park 3-23 3.11 Cedar Pond Park 3-25 3.12 Cinnamon Park 3-27 3.13 Clearwater Park 3-29 3.14 Country Home Park 3-31 3.15 Downing Park 3-33 3.16 Evergreen Park 3-35 3.17 Fish Lake Park 3-37 3.18 Goat Hill Park 3-39 3.19 Heine Pond Park 3-41 3.20 Highview Park 3-45 3.21 Holz Farm Park 3-47 3.22 Kettle Park 3-49 3.23 Lakeside Park 3-51 3.24 Lexington Park 3-53 3.25 Lexington/Diflley Park 3-55 • • • • • 3.26 Meadowland Park 3-57 3.27 Moonshine Park 3-59 3.28 Mueller Farm Park 3-61 3.29 Northview Park 3-63 3.30 Oak Chase Park 3-65 3.31 George Ohmann Park 3-67 3.32 O'Leary Park 3-69 3.33 Patrick Eagan Park 3-71 3.34 Peridot Path Park 3-73 3.35 Pilot Knob Park 3-75 3.36 Quarry Park 3-77 3.37 Rahn Park 3-79 3.38 Rahn Elementary School 3-81 3.39 Ravine Park 3-83 3.40 Ridgecliff Park 3-85 3.41 River Hills Park 3-87 3.42 Sky Hill Park 3-89 3.43 Slater Acres Park 3-91 3.44 South Oaks Park 3-93 3.45 Thomas Lake Park 3-95 3.46 Thomas Lake East Park 3-97 3.47 Trapp Farm Park 3-99 3.48 Oak Pond Hills Park 3-101 3.49 Walden Heights Park 3-103 3.50 Walnut Hill Park 3-105 3.51 Wandering Walk Park 3-107 3.52 Wescott Station Park 3-109 3.53 Wescott Commons Park 3-111 3.54 Windcrest Park 3-113 3.55 Woodhaven Park 3-115 3.56 School District 3-121 3.57 Regional Public Recreational Opportunities for Eagan Residents 3-131 3.58 Additional Recreation Opportunities: Public Indoor, Private Indoor/Outdoor, Non -Profit Indoor/Outdoor 3-147 3.59 Additional Recreation Opportunities: Commercial 3-157 3.60 Additional Recreation Opportunities: Historic Sites 3-165 and Nature Centers 5.1 Tennis Distribution 5-31 5.2 Skating Distribution 5-33 5.3 Park Service Area Analysis 5-37 5.4 Service Area 18 Analysis 5-40 5.5 Service Area 15 Analysis 5-44 5.6 Service Area 22 Analysis 5-47 5.7 Service Area 21 Analysis 5-50 5.8 Service Area 36E Analysis 5-53 7.1 Site Evaluation Factors 7-9 7.2 Community Open Space Evaluation 7-11 8.1 Community Trails Plan 8-21 10.1 Parcels for Park Acquisition or Preservation 10-5 11.1 Capital Investments 11-7 11.2 Annualized Acquisition and Development Investments 11-15 11.3 Annualized Development Investments 11-15 12.1 Park System Vision Plan 12-9 • • • • • • Executive Summary 1 CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Eagan Land Use Development 2-2 2.2 Population over 6 Years of Age 2-11 3.1 City of Eagan Park Facilities 3-2 3.2 School District Athletic Facilities Utilized by Eagan Residents 3-120 4.1 Park Classification System 4-3 4.2 Park Classification by Function 4-16 4.3 Eagan Park Facility Standards 4-18 5.1 1988 SCORP Survey of Households 5-3 5.2 Minnesota Recreation Activities (SCORP) 5-4 5.3 Per Capita Park Acreage Standards for Active Use Parcels 5-7 5.4 Park Acreage by Function 5-9 5.5 Future Active Area Recommendations 5-11 5.6 Outdoor Facilities Summary --City of Eagan 5-14 5.7 Eagan Athletic Association Baseball Participation 5-16 5.8 Adult Softball Participation 5-17 5.9 Eagan Athletic Association Softball Participation 5-18 5.10 Youth Soccer Participation 5-19 5.11 Outdoor Ice Organized Event Participation 5-20 5.12 Developed Indoor Gymnasium Facility Summary 5-21 5.13 Gymnasium -Based Program Participation 5-22 5.14 Athletic Facility Needs Based Upon Standards 5-27 6.1 Eagan Recreation Program Characteristics (1992-93) 6-22 7.1 Community Open Space Inventory and Evaluation 7-13 7.2 Site Prioritization Criteria 7-17 7.3 Open Space Evaluation Criteria for Priority Sites 7-19 7.4 Open Space Evaluation and Recommendations for Priority Sites 7-20 7.5 Potential Nature Walk Locations 7-25 7.6 Natural Resource Issues 7-30 8.1 Potential Nature Trail Locations 8-13 10.1 Land Acquisition Summary 10-2 10.2 Survey Summary of Special Use Facilities 10-17 10.3 Summary of Potential Special Use Facilities 10-19 11.1 Capital Investments 11-7 11.2 Projected Five Year Investments 11-8 11.3 Investment Program Summary 11-14 12.2 Eagan Parks and Recreation Service Model Contrasts 12-5 • • • Executive Summary Introduction This planning document provides a comprehensive inventory, review, and analysis of the existing park, recreation, and natural resources within the City of Eagan. Recommendations contained within the plan are an outgrowth of the planning process and are intended to provide a road map for the park system's continued development, program use, and capital improvements into the next century. This 1994 park system plan has incorporated pertinent information and ideas contained within the previous document completed in 1983. However, it casts a vision for ongoing growth and development essential as Eagan continues to increase in population and mature as a community. Mission Statement Eagan's Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission has adopted the following mission statement for the department, "To preserve and enhance ecologically diverse open space Throughout the City of Eagan, continue parks development and provide high quality active, educational, and environmental opportunities to meet current and future needs and interests of a diverse and changing population." Community Characteristics and Demographics Eagan is one of the major growth communities of Dakota County. Specific community characteristics and demographics include: • Eagan's 1990 population of 47,409 is projected to add a third more people by 2020-- reaching 71,000. • Households will double from the 1990 count of 17,427 to 32,000 in 2020. • New jobs totaling 15,000 will bring local employment to 42,000 by 2020. • Housing starts have leveled off from mid-1980s peak to a stable addition of approximately 800 per year. • Non-residential areas are fairly well defined with residential development ultimately likely to consume 53 percent of the community. • The community has a bimodal age distribution with a large number of adults 25 to 44 years old and youth under 15. • Household and age distribution characteristics vary by park planning district. • Forty-three percent of the households currently have children encompassing 32 percent of the population, and 6 percent are single parent households. • Three -fourths of the population have lived in the city Tess than five years, and 20 percent have moved to Eagan from other states. Inventory of Existing Park System Facilities Eagan currently has 54 existing parks with a combined total of approximately 1,100 acres. A narrative park inventory and facility assessment including individual park sketch plan occurs for each park within the system. Fourteen public schools in three school districts occur within Eagan's city limits. Of these facilities, 10 are elementary, 3 are middle school or junior high, and 1 is a high school. Indoor and outdoor facilities are utilized throughout the year by youth and adult leagues for a variety of athletic purposes. Regional public park and open space facilities exist managed by state, federal, county, or city governments. These and other nearby regional facilities contribute substantial open space and natural areas with access to community residents. The park system plan provides an in-depth review of facilities and services provided by various recreation suppliers, both public and private, located in and around the City of Eagan. Standards and Classification Standards and classifications for park facilities exist within the document to stimulate thought rather than to substitute for it. Standards are intended to improve community quality and provide for an even distribution of facilities. Eagan utilizes a park classification system that employs a variety of different elements including neighborhood common, neighborhood park, community athletic field, community park, linear park, conservation area, special use park, historic sites, and regional parks (outside of the municipal system). Clear definitions exist based upon primary uses, service areas, site size, and location criteria. Recommended facility standards exist for the primary activity or facilities contained within the park system. Standards include recommended space requirements, size and dimensions, orientation, units per capita, service area function, and location criteria. Needs and Demands Analysis Community needs have been identified. Those needs that currently exist are likely to occur in the years 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010. A number of different techniques were used to analyze and document park, recreation, and open space needs within the community. Specific tools employed Include State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan data, a comparison to accepted national acreage standards, neighborhood park service area analysis, user participation rate trends, and athletic association participation projections. State and regional recreational planning is important to the City of Eagan as it provides a broad sampling of recreation trends and needs for outdoor recreation. This information is also the basis for distributing statewide funds that can be considered as a forecast for those project types that have priority and will receive funding allocations. Demographic and regional information is subject to revision and should be monitored as new data becomes available. National standards examine park function by classification and provide a projection of desired active park acreage on a per 1,000 population basis. The planning document identifies active acreage within each of the park classifications and examines the adequacy of existing acreage for each of the future planning horizons. • • • • • • Prior park system planning in Eagan divided the community into six planning districts as a means of assessing park demand based upon development pressure and population concentrations. Park planning further divided the community into 34 neighborhood park service areas to guide the acquisition and development of neighborhood parks and recreation facilities. As of 1994, a limited number of neighborhood service areas are yet unresolved or fall short in terms of facilities available to local residents. The planning document examined in detail five neighborhood park service areas, assessed current and future needs of these neighborhoods, and identified prudent alternatives to meeting neighborhood demand. Youth and adult athletic needs are currently met by programs through both athletic associations and city recreation. Facility demand based upon user needs were examined by participation rate trends as recorded by the city. In addition, projections were obtained from respective athletic associations to assist in quantifying future required facilities. Both approaches, however, must take into consideration numerous variables that affect their accuracy. Projections have been made for each of the principal athletic activities taking into consideration usage, programming, and planned facilities. Tennis, skating, and ice hockey facilities were examined on a geographic distribution basis with areas of inadequate service identified. Information contained within the needs and demand analysis must be monitored by staff on an annual basis to track participation rates, provide a re-evaluation based upon additional facility development, and evaluate current programming. The principal decision -maker challenge is to maximize park and recreation facilities without physical deterioration due to overuse or compromised activities. Recreation Programs: Review and Analysis This analysis gives consideration to the major components of the leisure service delivery system and the organized recreation opportunities provided for the citizens of Eagan by the various parts of the system. Specific recommendations of the analysis include: • Park design, maintenance, and operation need to be constantly cognizant that parks are primarily for recreation use, however, natural open space must play a role within the community system. • The department should aggressively pursue "partnerships" for its programs in most instances. • The department needs to establish recreation program standards similar to park maintenance and park dimension standards. • Additional facilities, particularly indoor space, will be needed as the community's general population continues to grow. • The need for programmable space that can be reserved for departmental programs is critical. • Expansion of full-time staff and resulting budget increases must be addressed. • When new facilities are brought on line, a larger budget must exist. "Enterprise funding" should be considered for self supporting programs. • The department needs to be ready to adopt additional responsibilities for youth work, particularly the early adolescent age group. Natural Resources Natural resource preservation is a fundamental element of Eagan's park and open space planning. The document describes resources that contribute to Eagan's character, rationale supporting resource preservation, open space parcels of priority, and preservation methods. An assessment of programs, policies, ordinances guiding land development, and resource preservation are addressed. In addition, opportunities for natural resource interpretation are outlined. Specific natural resources within the community include the Minnesota River Valley, lakes and small water basins, wetlands, forest cover, and rolling terrain. Numerous arguments exist for preservation including maintenance of wildlife habitat and movement corridors; for preservation of rare or endangered flora and fauna; for storm water detention and aqua recharge areas; for visual relief_,nd_estheticconsid rations; to preserve the community's historical perspective; and to provid environmental education An initial open space screening was completed based upon said evaluation criteria that resulted in a series of prioritized sites for acquisition or preservation. Numerous tools exist for preserving these open space parcels including direct acquisition, park dedication, acquisition though properties with delinquent taxes, environmental restrictions, gift or donation, nonprofit organization purchase, and private ownership restrictions. A need exists in Eagan for environmental leaming and education. Altemative concepts in meeting this need include a mobile interpreter program, self -guided environmental leaming, and environmental learning center. It is likely that Patrick Eagan Park will serve as the hub for future environmental learning and education. However, individual facilities geographically distributed throughout the City should complement and be a part of an overall environmental program. Numerous policies and programs are currently in place regarding environmental management within the community. Aside from the City of Eagan, county, state, and federal agency regulations exist to assist in resource preservation and management. Existing programs are inventoried for their application within the City with agency responsibility identified. Action steps are also identified where additional improvements may assist in preserving Eagan's sensitive resource base. Trail System Trails provide the backbone of the open space system by interconnecting the community's parks. Currently, more than 80 miles of trails have been built along county roads, city streets, and in city parks. In an effort to continue local financing of the program, the City has established a trails dedication fund and a five-year trails maintenance program. User surveys and public imput identified bicyclists and pedestrians as the primary trail users, however, observations indicate a substantial increase in in -line skating. A high level of user satisfaction exists for the trail system. Comments were received regarding the lack of trail continuity, the need for additional neighborhood linkages, a strong desire for additional off -road trail corridors offering recreational experiences, the need for looping trails, and a desire for year- round trail use. Dakota County has played a substantial role in financing trails within roadway corridors. Subsequent maintenance and independent trail corridors are the responsibility of the City. Currently, the Eagan trail system is well suited for transportation purposes. Improvements could be considered to: • • • • • • • Improve access in and around the Town Centre commercial area. • Improve access and trail continuity into the community's northeastern industrial area. • Minimize I-35E as a barrier to trail users. • Continue to pursue inter -community connections with adjacent municipalities. • Increase user education and public awareness of the benefits and accessibility of trails as transportation. Recreational trails within the community provide a moderate level of off -road trail experience. Specific corridors for improvement should include: • A central corridor interconnecting O'Leary, Barbara Curry, Fish Lake, Patrick Eagan, and Lexington Diffley parks. • Additional independent alignments in the community's northeast industrial area through future public open space. • Development of trail heads within primary community parks. • Inclusion of additional nature trails within community park and larger neighborhood park facilities. Design guidelines for trails are included within the planning document. Recommendations for System Policies Numerous format and informal policies exist that provide department direction. Staff is refining these policies for insertion into the plan. Land Acquisition and Facility Development As Eagan nears the year 2000, the park system will be challenged by three capital intensive aspects. These include: • Land acquisition for active and passive uses, open space and natural resource preservation. • New facility development. • Redevelopment or renovation of existing facilities. Future land acquisition needs are driven by a variety of different factors reflecting both active and passive recreation demands. These include: • Acquisition of five neighborhood areas will be required for neighborhood common or neighborhood park development. • Community parks, especially a location in Eagan's northeast quadrant. • Community athletic fields, including a future youth baseball complex, girls' softball fields, and youth soccer. • Linear parks to provide new off road recreation trails and infill missing trail linkages. • Passive open space and natural resource protection. Active athletic facilities will be needed in response to growing participant demands. Existing or future needs are likely to require the following facility or system components: • Construction of the Lexington-Diffley Park with six softball fields and related support facilities and field lighting added by the year 2000. • Northview Park lighting improvements. • Construction of a four- to six -field youth baseball complex potentially with school district participation. • Two to four additional softball fields for girls' use. • Midterm development of additional soccer facilities. • Improved distribution of ice hockey, pleasure skating, inline hockey, tennis, and volleyball facilities. Additional special use facilities should be added as community demand is measured and documented. Three golf courses currently exist within Eagan with the likely need to add a fourth by the year 2020. • Privately owned and cooperative/programmed golf courses could promote public use and economic benefit without public ownership. • To assure public availability, the land could be zoned public recreation or included in the official map or both. Eagan's parks system's rapid growth and development has focused available resources towards land acquisition and facility development. However, many of the park facilities are at an age where their long term maintenance and replacement must be anticipated and provided for. Previously, the staff prepared a "Long Range Facility Maintenance and Replacement Program" that provides a systematic approach to maintaining facility integrity and anticipates the "capital" investment necessary in the future. City staff must anticipate the adoption of facilities for other purposes as community demographics and demands change and new recreation trends become apparent. System Funding and Financing The capital improvement investment plan and strategy is necessary to assist the department in meeting its future constituent needs and facility obligations. Two important points must be recognized by this strategy. 1. Investments in parks, recreation, and natural resources are not free-standing isolated expenditures. They have an important role in reinforcing the economic vitality of the City and creating a positive living and investment climate. 2. Investment expenditures and revenues are not single source or the sole responsibility of the government. Investments are made to engage the broadest range of participation and to reinforce other community objectives. The City should be prepared to engage and leverage other resources. • • • • Near -term, midterm, and Tong -term facility investments have been identified with general costs associated and identified. A four -legged approach is depicted to achieve balance within an investment strategy: 1. Property tax investments. 2. Grants, donations, and dedications. 3. Partnership and private providers. 4. Fees and entrepreneurs efforts. The level of effort in any particular arena is a policy choice. Many of the approaches are nontraditional and intended to broaden the range for meeting extensive and expanding needs in the face of increasing reluctance to support activities with tax dollars. The general summary is co -investing with all of the sectors of the community in strengthening the natural resource, park, and recreational base. One additional organizational funding option is also worth considering --the establishment of a venture or opportunity fund. This could have particular applications in land acquisition where parcels that exhibit certain plan quantities and objectives come up for sale, and need to be acted upon directly or through a land trust or other acquisition approach with reasonable dispatch. Currently, capital funds fall short of planned acquisition and development needs identified in the plan. New sources, resources, and arrangements are necessary to keep Eagan's system of public leisure time resources at the cutting edge. System Vision Statement Eagan's demographics and constituency are dynamic and subject to rapid change through the year 2020. In response, the park, recreation, and natural resource system must be fluid and respond to the needs required by the community. Future objectives of the department may include: • Programs and services should be based upon social and economic need extended beyond traditional recreation. • The department should enable and serve as a catalyst for identifying and matching programs to citizen's needs. • Residents should be assisted to develop their own leadership skills and provide assistance to staff in the various recreation programs. • A wide variety of funding sources should be employed well beyond traditional resources. • Ongoing program evaluation must occur in an open planning process to solicit community needs and participation. • Budgets should be based on program needs with measurable results. • Principle expected outcome should be related to human consequences and their responses. • Introduction and Background • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • e 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND • INTRODUCTION This planning document provides a comprehensive inventory, review and analysis of the existing park, recreation and natural resources within the City of Eagan. Recommendations contained within the plan are an outgrowth of the planning process and are intended to provide a road map for the park system's continued development, program use, and capital improvements into the next century. In 1983, the City prepared a park system plan that guided the City during the rapid growth of the 1980s. That plan focused upon the park system's physical growth especially neighborhood park development and trail construction. The original document focused on an early 1990 planning horizon and was becoming outdated. This 1994 Park System Plan has incorporated pertinent information and ideas contained within the previous document, however, it casts a vision for ongoing growth and development essential as Eagan continues to increase in population. • PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT The focus of this document has a multiple purpose: 1. A comprehensive inventory of existing park facilities occurs as a resource for future decision making and for regular consultation (Chapter 3). 2. Broad based analysis occurs as an examination of the needs and demands contained within the current community and future population thresholds. Examination of existing demographics provides the basis for understanding both Eagan's current composition and population characteristics (Chapter 2). User trends and other demand factors are analyzed to portray future facilities and program demands (Chapter 5). 3. Recreation elements are examined to understand their current adequacy and foresee future opportunities for redirection and refinement (Chapter 6). 4. With the expansion of the Advisory Commission to include natural resources, this plan examines the natural resource BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 1.1 1 INTRODUCTION base within the community, its need for preservation, and opportunities for integration into the park system (Chapter 7). 5. Continued community trail development and operation is anticipated (Chapter 8). 6. Existing policies are refined and additional policies outlined consistent with the park system's current complexion and anticipated growth (Chapter 9). 7. Planned land acquisition and facility development are examined (Chapter 10). 8. The financial aspects of these recommendations are examined and alternative mechanisms recommended for funding (Chapter 11). • PLANNING PROCESS The City of Eagan retained the consultant firm of Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. in mid-1993 to assist in the preparation of this planning document. During the planning process, Barton-Aschman was assisted by Resolution, Inc. and John Schultz, Ph. D. Regular work sessions occurred between the consulting team, staff, and the Park's, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Commission during the ensuing year. Technical memorandums were produced as working papers for City review, discussion, and refinement from which the plan emerged. Numerous presentations were made to the city council during their work sessions informing them of the plan's preliminary conclusions and soliciting their input. Opportunities for public involvement occurred aside from representation by the advisory commission and the city council. An informal survey of the park system's adequacy was made during the Public Works open house in 1993. Previously prepared user surveys of the community's park system were also consulted. In December 1994, a forum representing a broad cross section of citizens representing park, recreation and natural resource interest was convened. This forum provided a small group work session to identify issues and concerns for further examination. A public hearing was held by the advisory commission in June 1994 during which a comprehensive presentation of the draft document was made. This presentation was televised on the Government Access Channel after which telephone inquiries were invited. The public was also invited to examine the draft document in detail prior to final approval by the Advisory Commission and City Council. • • SARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 141 • • • 1 INTRODUCTION • MISSION STATEMENT Eagan's Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission adopted at their July 13, 1994 meeting the following mission statement for the department. To preserve and enhance ecologically diverse open space throughout the City of Eagan, continue parks development and provide high quality, active, educational and environmental opportunities to meet current and future needs and interests of a diverse and changing population. • USE OF THE PLAN This document is intended to be a dynamic plan subject to ongoing change and evolution as Eagan continues to grow and develop. Its contents should serve as a reference for the city council, advisory commissions, and city staff to assisting day to day, as well as, broader decision making. In addition, its graphic portrayals and narrative provide a reference for citizens in understanding Eagan's park system plan and forthcoming changes. Regular review by decision making parties should occur with amendments made as necessary to maintain the document's integrity, accuracy, and response to the community's ever changing complexion. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 1.3 1 INTRODUCTION BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 1-4 • • • 2 Community Characteristics and Demographics CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS CHAPTER 2: COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS AND DEMOGRAPHICS • DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS Location The City of Eagan is one of the major growth communities of Dakota County, the south east anchor to the Twin Cities Metro- politan area. Dakota County ranks as one of the top counties nationally in household income. Eagan is defined by the interstate on the north and the Minnesota River on the west and Lebanon Hills Regional Park and Minnesota Zoological Gardens on the south. The Cedar Avenue freeway almost provides the western boundary, while the eastern boundary with Inver Grove Heights is largely a survey line from the old township. Bloomington shares the river boundary and Mendota Heights is north of the 1-494 boundary. Other borders are shared with Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, Apple Valley and Burnsville. The basic fabric and framework of City development has been set. Vehicular access to the City directly relates to its growth rate. Regional access is provided directly by the perimeter freeways of Cedar Avenue and 1-494 and the diagonally traversing 1-35E. Major development sites remain at many of the City's interchanges. Setting aside the natural resource base momentarily and examining what the development overlay consists of, the immediate focus has to be Eagandale Center and the major industrial commercial complex in the north initiated back in the 60's. The planned industrial park, its extensions and the additions, as well as the newer business parks provide a solid and organized economic and tax base. The City has allocated 15% of its land area to industrial development and supporting uses in consolidated and planned districts. Another major node stretches along the Minnesota River flood plain. Twenty-six thousand jobs are provided in the City of Eagan. Residential development is the most extensive, occupying 53% of land area. Again the basic pattern of residential development is established with new development occupying platted areas or representing in -fill sites. The 2020 forecast of 71,000 people represents 70% of the projected capacity of the land areas BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN R.1 2 DEMOGRAPHICS planned for differing densities of housing. That estimate approaches 100,000 people at full development under current land use designations. The social organization of neighborhoods in the City is mostly in its formative stages, although there are some strongly identified neighborhoods. Tabulation of development under the current guide plan breaks down as follows: TABLE 2-1 EAGAN LAND USE DEVELOPMENT Residential 11,356 acres 53 Commercial 1,395 6 Industrial 3,215 15 Institutional 534 3 Regional Open Space 2,255 10 Municipal Parks and Open Space 790 4 Flood Plain 1,035 5 Freeways 860 4 21,440 100 0/0 Source: Comprehensive Plan • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS Overview Anticipating and providing for future recreation needs represents a challenge. Any plan must be dynamic as trends and demands change. Virtually none of the major recreational demand com- puter models considered major new or fad activities like downhill skiing, rowing, in -line skating, cross country skiing, wave pools and on and on. We know that leisure activities and facilities contribute to individual and community identity and well-being. The key to meeting the challenges of the next century is to think systematically and strategically. To capture future leisure opportunities, this plan builds on three important foundational elements: • Existing parkland, facilities, programs and leisure activities • Leisure trends, principles and markets • Development and population trends and demographic characteristics This section focuses on the latter element - what/who is Eagan. Matching demographic characteristics to trends should provide the framework for repositioning the physical and programmatic elements of the City's park, open space and recreation system. s • • BARTON A!-.CHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN !•B • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS This section also looks at the totals - how many people, how many houses, etc. But it also looks behind the totals to factors that influence choices and needs. What is the age structure? How many single head of households are there? How many kids and retirees make Eagan home? How does household income break down? What kind of jobs do people have? How far do they travel? How long have they lived in the community? How many cars per household? These characteristics are examined at the City and park planning district level. Population and Housing Trends POPULATION TRENDS The City of Eagan is one of the ten largest municipalities in the metropolitan area. In 1940, only 915 people called Eagan home while 1990 counted 47,409 residents. Current official metropolitan projections see another 14,000 people by 2020 to a total of 71,000 for an additional 30% population growth over the next 30 years. The following figure depicts historical and projected growth. Figure 2.1 City of Eagan Population Growth 1940-2020 Population 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year Source: US Census; Met Council RESOLUTION Ins. E1 Actual IN Projected HOUSING INVENTORY AND TRENDS People live in households or group quarters by themselves or with others. These household formations tell a lot about how people will act, what they will spend, where they will go. Households break down by ownership/construction type (single family, townhouse, apartment, condominium); family characteristics (single, married, divorced, widowed); households with and without children, etc. BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN R.3 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.2 City of Eagan Housing Starts NUMBER OF UNITS 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 1970 1975 1980 YEAR SOURCE: Met Co unit: RESOUlnON. Inc. 1985 1990 Again, the extent and pattern of growth in Eagan is noteworthy. The annual construction pattern depicted above illustrates the cycle nature of housing construction. The trends have steadied over the past several years after peaking in 1985-86 at 2,200 units per year. In the last decade, the City added 11,700 households. Since 1940, over 17,000 new living quarters have been established. Projected household additions to 2020 are projected to amount to 15,000 or nearly a doubling of current housing stock. Thirty-one percent of the housing stock is now multiple unit residencies. The chart below illustrates the composition of new construction annually by housing type. After the mid -eighties surge, housing construction has leveled off to a steady 800 plus housing units a year. The Metropolitan Council projects that the housing stock will again double in the next thirty years. Figure 2.3 City of Eagan Housing Starts by Type NUMBER OF UNITS 2,500 2,000 ■Single Unit 1,500- 1,000 -0 n U0rl _pia 3l!� ® Multiple Unit 1970 1980 1990 YEAR Sources Met Counal.RESOLUTION,Inc 1996 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN R.4 • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS AGE CHARACTERISTICS Age characteristics are among the most significant individual demographic characteristics influencing recreation. The accompanying charts look at 1990 age characteristics, compare age characteristics with Dakota County and the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, and examine change in percentage of population in various age groups between 1980 and 1990. Eagan generally has a higher proportion of its population in the 25-44 year old group and Tess in the over 55 year old age groups than the County and Metropolitan Area. The first chart below shows the 1990 age make-up of the city. The city is clearly a young family dominated community. Dependent population under 18 and over 65 is 33%, dominated by children at 31%. The metropolitan area has 28% under 19 years and 10% over 65 years of age. As Eagan stabilizes and ages, the dependency ratio will probably remain similar, but children will decline and seniors will increase. Figure 2.4 City of Eagan 1990 Population by Age Group Number of People 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Source: US Census; Resolution <5 10-14 20-24 30-34 45-54 65-74 85+ 5-9 15-19 25-29 35-44 55-64 75-84 Age Groups In comparing the changing proportion of population in each age group, it is important to remember that the total population doubled between 1980 and 1990, adding over 20,000 people. As the chart shows, 25 - 49 year olds increased as a proportion of the population base along with children under five years. Every other population group stayed the same or declined as a part of the population. The first chart below shows the 1990 age make-up of the city. The city is clearly a young family dominated community. Dependent population under 18 and over 65 is 33%, dominated by children at 31%. The metropolitan area has 28% under 19 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 2.6 Some: US Census; Resolution 2 DEMOGRAPHICS years and 10% over 65 years of age. As Eagan stabilizes and ages, the dependency ratio will probably remain similar, but children will decline and seniors will increase. Figure2.5 City of Eagan 1990 Age Group Comparisons Percent of Total Population 20% 0% <5 10-14 20-24 30-34 45-54 65-74 85+ 5-9 15-19 25-29 35-44 55-64 75-84 Age Groups Is the age composition of Eagan different from Dakota County and the metropolitan area? Indeed. Again, the dominant patterns of young children up to five years of age and adults 25 - 44 years old stand out as well as small proportions of seniors compared to the other jurisdictions. The current age pattern and projected growth will tend to define recreational programming and recreational family needs pointing toward middle aged adults and children during the 90's. Figure 2.6 City of Eagan 1990 Age Group Comparisons Percent of Total Population 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% <5 10-14 20-24 30-34 45-54 65-74 85+ 5-9 15-19 25-29 35-44 55-64 75-84 Age Groups Source: US Census; RESOLUTION Inc • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN R-B • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS RACE CHARACTERISTICS Change in racial composition like change in any number of demographic characteristics is overshadowed by the sheer pace of growth and comparison with the previous decade does not provide much of a benchmark for examining community change. The current base is now large enough that future comparisons will be of value. In 1990, the four major races tabulated were White, Black, Asian and American Indian. The breakdown of the population by race is depicted here. Figure 2.7 White 94.0% City of Eagan Racial Composition 1990 Black 2.2% American Indian 0.4% Asian 3.4% Source: RESOLUTION Inc; US Census Household Characteristics Household characteristics relating to income, family composition, family size and other related factors give a portrait of possible behaviors and needs. Many of these characteristics are also reported at the park planning district level. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS In 1990, Eagan's 47,409 residents comprised 12,610 families (two or more related individuals) and 17,401 households. Figure 2.8 shows the number of individuals in each type of living arrangement. The dominant living arrangement is in family households totalling 86% of all the population. Sixty percent of the family population is adutts with 40% children. People in non - family living arrangements total 14% of the population. Non - family households are headed by equal numbers of men and women. The non -family population occupies 27% of the households. People in group quarters are almost negligible. Household size and family living arrangements are portrayed in the following pages. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 2-7 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.8 Family -Adults 52.2% Group 0.1 % Non -relatives 3.8% Female 5.0% Male 5.1% City of Eagan 1990 Individual Living Arrangements Family -Children 33.8% SOURCE: US Censuc;RESOLUIION, Inc. NUMBER OF PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD The number of persons per household has been steadily declining as the number of children being born has declined and the number of no children households and single person households has increased. The number of persons per household has diminished from 4 in 1970 to 3 in 1980 and to 2.72 in 1990. Thirty-two hundred people (6.7%) live in single person households. Single person households comprise 19% of total city households. Eagan households are broken out by the number of persons per household on the following graph. The distribution shows that 32% of the households are two person, while one, three or four person households each comprise 19% of total City households. Only 2.3% of households are larger than six persons. Figure 2.9 1 Person 19.4% 4 Person City of Eagan 1990 Household Size SOURCE. US Census, RESOLUTION, Inc 19.8% 6+ Person 3.4% BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN B•B • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS HOUSING TYPE AND OWNERSHIP Home ownership is 69% of the housing supply with mortgages in force on 94% of that housing. Vacancies were running between 5 and 6 percent in 1990. 36,000 persons live in owner occupied housing, while 11,000 are renters. Of the 18,450 total housing supply (occupied and vacant), single unit detached and attached comprise two-thirds of the inventory. Nearly 12% of the units are in structures with 50 or more units. Only 33 manufactured homes were available in the City. Figure 2.10 City of Eagan Housing Inventory Number of Units in Structure 3-9 10-19 SOURCE:US Census; RESOLUTION,Inc. 20-49 HOUSING STOCK AGE With the rapid growth of the City, it is no surprise that the median year of all housing construction is 1983. Housing over 25 years of age begins to need attention and reinvestment. Only 2,400 units are in that category today, but double (4,600) will come of renovation and repair age during the 90's. As housing ages, it requires more time and investment to maintain liveability. The impact on recreation is the amount of leisure time available will be reduced, the direction of that leisure time activity will change to more flexiable and closer activities, and the resources available for recreational pursuits will be diverted. BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 2.8 US Census; RESOLUTION Inc. 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.11 City of Eagan Age of Housing Stock 1990 Number of Units 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 <5 years 6-10 11-20 Age of Housing 20+ LENGTH OF RESIDENCY As the City's growth rate stabilizes and matures, fewer new residents will be absorbed each year and the number of "roots" will increase. With that stability, more attention is turned to the community and community based activities. Since home ownership remains a Midwestern goal, renters have generally lower lengths of occupancy. For example, only 250 rental units have been occupied by the same householders for more than five years. By contrast, in Roseville the average length of occupancy of a rental household is more than seven years. Figure 2.12 City of Eagan Length of Residence 1990 30+ 0.8% 21-30 3.4% SOURCE: US Census; RESOLUTION, Inc. • • • BARTON ASCMNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT SAGAN, MN R-1O • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS RESIDENT ORIGINS The influx of new residents provides a dynamic challenge in defining facilities needed and supporting programs. The City has surveyed its population periodically to assess these changing needs. The baseline demographics give a point of departure for adjusting to changing trends. Where people come from is also useful in tracking needs that will begin to emerge. In general, the Twin Cities metropolitan area population has expanded by geographic sector. Slicing the metropolitan area into sectors or pie slices from the center out, the bulk of suburban growth in any sector is stimulated from people living closer to the center moving out within the same sector. Eagan's transportation system, airport proximity, and regional access may have modified those general trends with its strong orientation to Minneapolis as well as St. Paul. The 1990 Census does not report municipality to municipality or community to community movement. However, it does provide some basis for identifying where current residents were five years ago. TABLE 2-2 City of Eagan Population over 6 Years of Age Residence in 1985 Same House 14,052 33.4% Other Metro Counties 10,234 24.3 Dakota County 7,681 18.2 Other States 7,298 17.3 Greater Minnesota 2,297 5.5 Foreign 540 1.3 Only a third of the population is in the same house they occupied five years earlier. Somewhat surprisingly, 17% of Eagan residents came from another state in the last five years. Of the 24% moving in from other metropolitan counties, sixty- four hundred (or 15%) residents lived in either Minneapolis or St. Paul five years earlier. The turnover, relative newcomers, and number of people from outside of Minnesota underscore the importance of adequate communications channels. HOUSING VALUE AND COSTS Housing value (rental cost or home value) along with household income give some measure to capacity and leisure time needs. Three-quarters of the units rent for more than $500/month. Seventy percent of all owner occupied units pay $700 or more a month for housing. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN. EAGAN, MN R•111 2 DEMOGRAPHICS • City of Eagan Monthly Rental Payments 1990 Number of Units 5,000 Figure 2.13 4,000 - 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 1 <$200 200-299 300-499 500-749 755-999 Cost of Rent SOURCE:US Census;RESOLUTION, Inc 1000+ The median value for an owner occupied housing unit in Eagan was $104,900 in 1990. The distribution of owner occupied units by value is portrayed below. Figure 2.14 City of Eagan Owner Occupied Housing Value 1990 Number of Units 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 <$50 0•^ 0 50-99 100-125 125-150 150-200 Value of Housing SOURCE:US Census,RESOLUTION, Inc. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN E•12 • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS HOUSEHOLD INCOME Household income is related to family size and number of income producers in the household. Family income is generally the highest, with non -family households being the lowest. In 1990, median income for Eagan households broke down as follows: Eagan Median Income Household Family Non -family $46,612 $51,023 $31,908 Figure 2.15 City of Eagan Household Income 1989 Number of Households 7,000 6,000 - 5,000 4,000 - 3, 000 2,000 - 1,000 - , A 0 <$10,000 1 10-25 25-35 35-50 50-75 Income Group SOURCE: RESOLUTION, Inc; US Census 75-100 >100 Recognizing the importance of linking household income to the number of people in the household, it is none the Tess instructive to look at the distribution of households by income group as a rough measure of recreational access and preference. HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION Finally, a look at the composition of households provides some further insights into recreational needs. For example, one person headed households with children will have different demands than two adult person households with children. Of the 17,400 households, 7,600 or 44% have children. Of the 12,600 families, the percentage of households with children is 60%. Families constitute 72% of all households. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN Q•13 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.16 City of Eagan Household Composition 1990 Female w/children 4.9% No child family 28.8% Source: US Census; RESOLUTION Inc. Married w/children 37.3% Male w/children 1.5% Non -family 27.5% The demographic data establishes the baseline for relating to trends and needs analysis. Some of these characteristics are displayed by park planning area to set the stage for subarea planning interpretation. Park Planning District Characteristics PARK PLANNING DISTRICT DEFINITION Organization of the City into various geographical units is useful for data collection analysis and policy development as well as for management plans. Natural and man made features overlap, linked together by drainage courses, pipes and surface travel routes. Each sub area has land use, demographic, economic, and natural resource characteristics. Coterminality, or at least common borders among all geographical subdivisions, is an ideal beyond reach. It is worth noting some of these geographical divisions: • Political • Congressional District • Legislative District • County Commission District • Court District • Watershed District • Metropolitan Council District • Local Precinct • School District • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B-14 e • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS • Land Use and Demographics • Zoning District • Census Tract • Subdivision • Planning District • Neighborhood • School District • School Attendance District • Assessment District • Market Area • Traffic Analysis Zones • Enumeration District • Zip Code • Natural Resources • Surface Water Management District • Shoreland Management District • Minnesota National Wildlife District • Flood Plain • Management • Street Maintenance • Fire Service • Park Management • Police Patrol • Postal Carrier Routes • Phone Exchanges Most information about people is directed to street addresses and compiled by block and census tract. This data is used for a whole variety of detailed socioeconomic data and forms the basis for establishing legislative district. People and demographic information, particularly income and purchasing information, is increasingly being compiled by postal zip code. The greatest amount of demographic information is collected by the U.S. Census on an address and block basis and is compiled by census tracts. Census tracts are typically defined by natural barriers and strive to contain a similar number of people. Local planning staffs help to define these tracts to include neighborhoods or geographic areas of similar characteristics. Traffic assignment zones (TAZ's), on the other hand, try to define travel sheds, and instead of using major streets as edges or neighborhood barriers, TAZ's encompass these routes and look for district boundaries where travel is interrupted. Improved computer access and connection to geographic information system mapping reduces the reliance on pre -defined geographical areas. Data collection, analysis and maintenance can be expensive. Therefore, plugging into other data bases as much as possible provides some cost effective data utilization. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, ING PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 2.16 2 DEMOGRAPHICS BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 12•98 1/4 1/2 3/4 MILES BLOOMINGTON HIGHVIEW PILOT KNOB SKY HILL ■ ,a § • N• PERIDO • (� PATH "J ■ CARNELIAN CC CEDAR O OND ■ Z MEI MIN M — M IMI — ■ ^) n ■ ix F • RIVER +2! .. OaF ! HILLS )% 1 / ■ E'��''' ' CINNAMON- ' G``n 1-eke Idi. 11 —1 • � RAHN Q • ■ / ■ /■ • ,i1� • KETTL • • II rt ,, • ' r,.LAT.�� G' _.. • _ C'LEBANON ■ '' HILLS IIQ REGFONAL ! k PARK APPLE VALLEY ni rinv�nrl R 1 FISH LAKE BARBA CURRY ilderness Run R OA AS HOMAC LAKE EAST CLEARWATER GEORGE OHMANN MENDOTA HEIGHTS LEXINGTON Lone Oak Rd. Yankee Doodle Rd NortnvIew Park R NORTHVIEW L Difflev R LEXINGTON DIFFLEY GOAT HILL xi WALNUT HILL • - (-OS COUNT WESCOTT STATION WANDERI� WALK RIDLE RI • ■ • ■ ■ 1 ▪ ■ • CAPTAIN DODD 2 DEMOGRAPHICS FIGURE 2-17 PARK PLANNING DISTRICTS LEGEND N 0 - PLANNING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES CITY PARK COUNTY OR STATE PARK -00 PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, IVINI GI - 17 • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS PARK PLANNING DISTRICTS The park plan of 1982 established six park planning districts. The planning districts are useful geographical subdivisions for evaluating park and recreation needs and programs. They may or may not relate to park maintenance administration or recreation program management. Figure 2-18 identifies 1990 census tracts and previous park planning districts Within those districts, thirty-four neighborhood park planning service areas were defined. Those service areas helped establish the neighborhood park as the building block of the park system. Since the park planning districts were established, new census tracts were defined for 1990. Compiling and displaying sub -area data for park planning purposes relied on the availability of census tract population data and attempted to develop a modified set of park planning districts which complied with census tract boundaries but kept as much compatibility to the 1982 districts as possible. Using census based geographic sub -areas permits easy updating of demographic information so that programs can be adjusted to changing conditions. Comparison of 1982 (numeric designation) park planning districts and 1993 (alpha designation) census tract based park planning districts would produce the following observations: District 1 (E) Essentially the same. District 2 (F) The Minnesota River bottom was not included in 1982 boundaries. Since no population is involved, the bottomland inclusion in one planned district or another has little implication. The eastern boundary is shifted slightly westerly reflecting the previous alignment of 35E rather than the constructed one. District 3 (A) Essentially the same. District 4 (B) The 1982 district had its southern border on Wescott Road. Census tract boundaries in 1990 are at Yankee Doodle Road or Diffley Road. Therefore, this district was extended southward to Diffley Road given the extensive industrial concentration in the north and also includes the southwest triangle from district 2. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN/ EAGAN, MN B-19 2 DEMOGRAPHICS District 5 (C) District 6 (D) District 5 is contracted southerly from Wescott Road to Diffley Road resulting in a smaller planning district. This district is reduced slightly with the inclusion of the triangle defined by 35E, Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road in planning district 4. The census tract based park planning districts are fairly similar to the earlier districts with the exception of the expansion of 4 (B) and contraction of 5 (C). Again, the purpose is to establish geographic sub -units or planning districts where demographic information is available to monitor trends and adjust policies and programs. The planning district data is again baseline for describing and evaluating program and facility needs. Figure 2-19 examines district resident age patterns. All of the age scales are the same depicting the absolute number of people in each age group for each planning district. For example, district B has the greatest number of 5-14 year olds and 25-44 year olds while district F has the greatest number of 45-64 year olds. Similarly in looking at household composition, district C has the highest percentage of married households with children while district A has the smallest. Figure 2-20 depicts household composition for each of the planning districts. The proportion of households without children is fairly similar in nearly all of the planning districts. Planning district A has the largest contingent of non -family households. The bi-modal population distribution indicates that the City will make major shifts from one emphasis to another unless migration alters the demographics. The tendency will be to age in place and retain the adult node while diminishing younger population groups. For example, after 45 years of age, moving to a new house diminishes dramatically. At the same time, participation in team sports is also dropping off rapidly. Therefore, yesterday's demand for softball fields will yield to tomorrow's emphasis on golf, tennis, reading, and boccie ball and relatively quickly since so many people are in the same age group. • APPLYING AND INTERPRETING TREND DATA Recreational program and facility demand is a moving target. Understanding and connecting to specific information can assist in interpreting the policy and system orientation of the plan to program and facility initiatives. Relating needs to demographic • • • BAFITON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN Q•QO • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.18 City of Eagan Planning District Age Groups AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24 15-19 5-14 <5 AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24 15-19 5-14 <5 AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24 15-19 5-14 <5 Source: US Census; RESOLUTION, Inc. IN Planning District A 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE ■ Planning District C 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE ■ Planning District E 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24Mil 15-19• 5-14 <5 ▪ Planning District B 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE • Planning District D AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24 15-19 5-14 <5 AGE 75+ 65-74 45-64 25-44 20-24 15-19 5-14 <5 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE • Planning District F 5,000 6,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NUMBER OF PEOPLE BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN E-E1 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.19 City of Eagan Planning District Households Source: US Census; RESOLUTION, Inc. Planning District A No Children 615 Female w/Child 112 Male w/Child 38 Married w/Child 551 Non -family 956 Planning District C Married w/Chil 1,211 Male w/Child 6 No Children 707 Non Family 263 Female w/Child 85 Planning District E Male w/Child 43 Married w/Child 913 No Children Non Family 720 467 Female w/Child 60 Planning District B Male w/Child 86 No Children 1,111 Female W/Chil 224 Married w/Child 1,602 Non Family 1,139 Planning District D Male w/Child 21 No Children 763 Female w/Child 118 Married w/Child 1,058 Non Family 684 Planning District F Male w/Child 68 No Children 1,092 Female w/Child 247 Married w/Child 1,153 Non Family 1,259 • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN B.R.2 • Source: NSGA RESOLUTION Inc. 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 2.20 National In -Line Roller Blading Participants by Age 1991 % Distribution of Participants 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 7-11 12-17 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Age Group characteristics is useful in gauging investments and approaches particularly in those areas of significant up front investment. An example is the rapidly growing area of in -line skating or roller blading. Virtually an unknown activity five years ago, this recreational activity has grown to about a 3.5% participation rate, roughly 7.5 million skaters nationally, although Eagan likely has a higher participation rate. Examining the cross section of participants, there is a fairly even distribution among income groups with some additional participation from $50-75,000 income households. Participants are fairly evenly divided between males and females. The result is that age is probably the most distinguishing factor. The accompanying age participation chart in Figure 2-19 shows the slight preference for male participants and the heavy preponderance of participation coming from the 7-17 year age group. Obviously, in examining whether or not to invest in facilities to support in -line skating, an examination of overall participation would occur. In providing the facilities, it would make sense to focus initially on areas serving 7-17 year olds while monitoring to determine if the current experience will become a trend or as more are exposed to in -line skating, participation rates will creep up as the entry skaters age. Again, the illustration is to demonstrate the use of the demographic database to interpret and extend the park plan and recreational programming on an ongoing basis. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN R•R3 2 DEMOGRAPHICS • DEMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS AND TRENDS Overview and Application of Demographic Characteristics Looking at the population characteristics and providing bench- marks from which to monitor trends is one important part of the park and open space planning process. Projections of demand are of importance because when land is purchased, facilities constructed, and staff hired, the commitment is made. In rapidly changing times, risk assessments are appropriate and in potentially dynamic areas, consideration for conversion of the space, facility or program merits attention at the outset. Projections tend to be lineal, but in reality are anything but. Leisure time and recreation activities interact with employment changes, life style changes and leisure time changes. As each cohort age group moves up the ladder, they change the nature of the cohort group before. For example, each generation is better educated that the past. So a straight line educational level projection would under shoot the mark. Or as another example, the fact that most in -line roller bladers are young is an indication of current participation patterns, but will these young users continue skating as they grow older? Beyond the importance of a data base and its regular up keep is the determination of (1) who will be living in Eagan (what are their demographic characteristics), and (2) what will be their recreation participation patterns and priorities. Participation patterns and trends are examined elsewhere in this report. Nevertheless some findings and assumptions are useful in anticipating future needs. The previous sections have established the characteristics of the existing Eagan residents and households from a city-wide and a park planning district perspective. This concluding section summarizes some of the major trends and applies them to Eagan. Those trends overlap and intersect with those contained in the recreation programming section as well. • MAJOR TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS Baseline information comes from Eagan's Comprehensive Plan, the 1982 Park Plan, US Census of Population, numerous recreation surveys and trend data, and the Metropolitan Council. The interpretation and application of this data was undertaken by the planning team and commission review and input. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PI -AM EAGAN, MN Q•E4 • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Base Findings 1. Eagan is projected to add a third more people (23,500) to reach 71,000 by 2020. 2. Households will nearly double from the 1990 count of 17,427 to 32,000. 3. New jobs totaling 15,000 will bring local employment to 42,000 by 2020. 4. Housing starts have leveled off from 1985-86 peaks to a stable addition of 800 per year. That average rate, tempered by economic cycles, is projected to continue for a number of years before tapering off. 5. The City's non-residential areas are fairly well defined. Residential development will fill in between the established framework. 6. The City has a bimodal age distribution - a large number of adults 25-44 years old and youth under fifteen. 7. Household and age distribution characteristics vary by park planning district. 8. Fifty-two percent of the population lives in households as adult families, 32% in households with children and 15% as singles. 9. Forty-three percent of the households currently have children, encompassing 32% of the population. Six percent are single parent households. 10. Three quarters of the population have lived in the City Tess than five years and nearly 20% have moved to Eagan from other states. Leisure and Demographic Trends 1. Americans now value leisure time as highly as money. Fifty percent of workers have indicated they would give up a day's pay for another day off. 2. Leisure time is increasing but the perception of a time crunch is increasing more rapidly. Parents and women are particularly affected. The time crunch perception begins to subside after age fifty. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN E•R 2 DEMOGRAPHICS 3. Age 45 has historically been a threshold where the numbers changing residence, job or spouse diminish significantly. There is a tendency to stay in place. 4. Most two adult non senior households have both adults working. 5. The percentage of women in the work force has started to level off, indicating that those that have to or want to work have now chosen to do so. Men participating in the work force continues to decline gradually. 6. Single person and single head of households continue to expand. 7. As the overall population ages, fewer kids are produced, team sports are replaced with individual sports, spontaneity overtakes preplanning, a big move to on -demand everything expands, exercise is moderate and supplemented or replaced by socializing. 8. Parents are moving to select recreational pursuits for their children which will improve the child's chances to compete more effectively in school, play and eventually work. 9. Recreation continues to be imbedded in the life course of individuals and is rooted in self -display, styles and the interest of acceptance and approval. Designing recreational spaces for participator and watchers will continue. The swimming pool converted to a leisure pool has experienced three -fourths of participants standing with only a toe or foot in the water. 10. Older Americans, although not in the work force, keep busy albeit dominated by television watching. However, they also do more housework, reading and walking than their younger counterparts. 11. The arrival of the baby boomers in the seniors category should spark some return to the interests of their twenties and thirties. 12. Distance costs of recreation will continue to mount as congestion spreads through the suburbs. Along with increasing time pressures, most will turn to their local and accessible resources. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•BS • • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS 13. Shopping will continue as a central leisure activity with the'pofential for combining home and shopping in the cable TV environment. 14. The quality of relationships will remain central to satisfaction in recreational activities. 15. Environmental and educational concerns will be acutely focused. 16. The trend to securing blocks of time will continue. The increased single parent, three day weekend vacation retreat is but one example. 17. The trend toward independence and self-reliance will particularly impact women's participation. Women based recreational offerings will likely become more diverse and Tess tied to family activities. 18. The changing workplace and home place will cause more attention to be shifted to off -hour and odd hour programming which should increase facility capacity but stretch staff and volunteer resources and create unique management demands. 19. Disparity of income, an increased group of higher discretionary incomes, and increasing education will place stress on programming and take special efforts to represent those groups with Tess clout or resources. 20. More and more adults will at one time or another be single. Leisure settings will need to increase for single, unaffiliated participation. 21. Care giving and support for the elderly and disabled will increase and change, putting new demands on families, care providers and leisure program providers and facilities. 22. Skill and learning environments will become more important as individuals will seek to define themselves through recreation. 23. Business involvement in meeting leisure needs should increase as public resources continue to be more scarce. Again, the same pressures that face public recreation providers from more affluent, more effective requesters will probably skew market involvement until "high end" saturation occurs and BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN E•E7 2 DEMOGRAPHICS middle markets are explored. Joint venture and inter agency opportunities can become significant. 24. Reduced funding for culture and arts will place greater pressure on charitable giving and non-profit and public entities, increasing the emphasis on cost recovery and fees. 25. Home electronics prices will fall as interactivity and on demand services rise. The strong devotion to television and electronic media along with all of the pressures noted above will make the home the core leisure center for more individuals and families. 26. Non -family leisure settings and organization will become even more important as the post parental period extends with increased life expectancy. 27. Leisure is a choice based activity driven by perceptions of time, cost and lifestyles. As a result, any given activity that people are engaged in will be rated highly enjoyable because they chose it regardless of age, gender,ethnicity etc. Men and women who do housework enjoy it about equally. 28. What motivates people to choose certain leisure activities might help play back against the demographic profiles and propensities. In surveys of adults over sixteen to determine the mix of motivation for use of free time, 94% stated the need to recuperate from other activities giving a strong inertia to what is. Ninety-three percent cited a commitment to finish whatever they had started - sewing club, volleyball league, whatever. Pleasure seeking was motivation to only half, and a third cite ambition as a motivation and that is highly skewed to the young. It must be noted that these vignettes of trends based on demo- graphic subsets is interpreting and extending the likelihood from what has been. Certain things are certain -physical prowess declined with age - while others are influenced by society and styles and acceptance. The unshackling of sexual parameters, for example, extends the challenges for teenage and young adult sexual identity, child bearing and rearing and family structure. Generally, more is acceptable now than before broadening the range of diversity and choice. The results of the stylistic changes on leisure activities will be a moving target requiring on -going monitoring and evaluation. The roller blade example is one illustration. Will this continue to be an activity for the • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN R•RE • • 2 DEMOGRAPHICS young or will it move up with its discoverers? One thing is dear - electronics and particularly television will continue to be the conveyer of most messages. This background is not intended to be applied to a major recreation demand or market model. It should help, along with actual program observation, to gauge trends and evaluate initiatives. The little details and trends tend to obscure the big picture. That is reemphasized in the recreation programming section of this report where major trends and resulting policy choices are described. All of these observations have some impact on the physical, social and economic development of Eagan. Some specifically extracted applications are highlighted as the conclusion to this discussion. • GENERAL APPLICATION TO EAGAN 1. More recreation land and facilities will be required to meet increasing population and leisure demands. 2. The ability to assess public and private resources and coordinate those facilities and programs will reduce how much the City and other public agencies will have to do directly. 3. The trend to closer to home, home based, skill development, education and related recreational demands opens opportunities for building connections to facilities and programs that are not only physical but visual and informational. 4. Organized, team oriented outdoor (and indoor) recreation will continue to be a strong demand, given the population profile, over the next decade. 5. The bi-modal (young and middle-aged adults) age distribution could mean a rapid shift of recreational demands as these groups move into the next cohort in significant numbers. 6. A large number of adults are moving into the age group where locational stability occurs, meaning the community will begin to age in place, and with that the stronger home recreation orientation and sense of community needs. 7. A retired population will begin to build. These people will tend to be active and affluent seeking social BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN I1•129 2 DEMOGRAPHICS interaction, skill replacement or enhancement, and educational opportunities. 8. More teens will also occur in the next generation with the broad range of challenges and opportunities that demographic cross section brings. 9. Demographic patterns vary in each of the planning districts so facility and program cross sections will vary for each of these sub -communities. 10. As noted, three -fourths of the population has lived in Eagan for less than five years. As the City stabilizes, this large group could become "nested" en masse heightening demands and exploding participation. Just as recreation is influenced by stylistic changes in American culture, parks and recreation has an opportunity to shape and encourage those changes. Now familiar words such as partnership, volunteerism, leverage and community become even more important. Park improvements can reinforce community. Volunteers can extend programs and participation. Facility locations and maintenance can enhance neighborhoods. Partnerships can expand opportunities with reduced public resources. Public investments can leverage economic evelopment. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 2•30 • Inventory of Existing Park System Facilities • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 3 INVENTORY CHAPTER 3: INVENTORY OF EXISTING PARK SYSTEM FACILITIES • RECREATION AMENITIES AVAILABLE TO THE CITIZENS OF EAGAN Due to Eagan's position as a major suburb in a large metropolitan area and its location in a state with many natural resources, the citizens of Eagan are served by a wide variety of parks and recreation amenities. These amenities include parks and facilities developed and maintained by the Eagan Department of Parks and Recreation as well as other public and private facilities located within Eagan and the surrounding area. This chapter is an inventory of Eagan parks and recreation facilities as well as a summary of those additional public and private facilities that bear a significant role as recreation opportunities for the citizens of Eagan. The parks and recreation facilities have been organized into the following categories: City of Eagan Park and Recreation facilities, regional public park and recreation facilities, school district recreation facilities, and additional recreation opportunities. • EAGAN PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES INVENTORY Eagan hast4:)existing parks with a combined total of approxi- mately 1,100 acres. Figure 3.1 graphically depicts all of the parkland within the City of Eagan. The parks are shown by name and colored according to their classification (classifications have been defined in the previous chapter). Arterial and collector roads are shown in solid black (based upon the City of Eagan Transportation Master Plan). Neighborhood streets are shown in light grey. Table 3.1 is a comprehensive list of Eagan's parks in alphabetical order listing the facilities and acreage of each park. The totals of each type of facility and total park acreage are shown at the bottom of the chart. Following Table 3.1 is a narrative park inventory and facility assessment which describes each park in greater detail. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3.1 3 INVENTORY TABLE 3.1: PARK FACILITIES Park Barbara Curry cc ammmzEim �[Tf�1lij�iFtT1 S'. INTMITET 0 F ii�IiFTTd11FiR�i1[ L G+. 1T][tl73TBGFfT .Q 0 u c. o L C c 0 U lifeltal MUM :0I i21i(G77 ' c 0 I��1IIitS'itt EIMEIT • Berry Patch Blackhawk 1 Bridle Ridge Bur Oaks 1 1 1 2 Captain Dodd 1 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Carlson Lake Mini Carnelian 1 Cedar Pond 1 Cinnomon 1 1/2 1 Clearwater 1 1 Country Home 1 Mini 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Downing Evergreen 1 Fish Lake 1 1/2 1 1 OL 1 2 1 1 1 1 Goat Hill 1 1 Heine Pond 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Highline Trail Highview 1 1 1 Holz Farm Park Kettle 1 1 Lakeside 1 Lexington Lexington/Diffley 1 1/2 Meadowland 1 1 Mini Moonshine OL 1 1 1 1 Mueller Farm 2 1 Northview 2 8 11 O'Leary Oak Chase Ohmann Patrick Eagan Peridot Path 1 1 Pilot Knob Quarry 1 1 1/2 2 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 Rahn 2 1 2 Ravine 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Ridge Cliff 1 1 1 2 1 River Hills 1 1 Sky Hill 1 1 2 1 Ol. 2 1 1 1 Slater Acres South Oaks 1 Thomas Lake Thomas Lake East 1 Trapp Farm 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Walden Heights Walnut Hill 1 1 1/2 Wandering Walk OL Wescott Commons Wescott Station W indcrest 1 Woodhaven 2 1/2 Unnamed 1 1 OL 2 Unnamed TOTALS • 10-Full / 13-1/2-Mmi 1 20 2 10 4 1.1 5 8 18 3 -4 13 8 10 39 1 1 10 BARTON A$CFMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK IYSTE'Nt PLAN; CAGAN, MN i•! • • • 0 14 1,2 3t4 MIL BL OOMJNG TON 3 INVENTORY FIGURE 3-1 CITY OF EAGAN PARK FACILITIES LEGEND NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COMMUNITY PLAYFIELD CONSERVANCY PARK UNDEVELOPED PARK COMMUNITY PARK LINEAR PARK COMMONS SPECIAL USE PARK COUNTY OR STATE PARK PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 3 - 3 • • • 3 INVENTORY ■ NARRATIVE PARK INVENTORY AND FACILITY ASSESSMENT A narrative inventory and facility assessment for individual parks occurs in the following pages. Each park is described by name, size, classification, adjacent land use, and existing facilities. The park's size is divided by total, usable, developed, and open space acreages. Open space refers to undeveloped space that is not suitable for formal use. The open space number plus usable number equals the total acreage number. Developed acres is a subset of the usable acres category. Each park was toured by staff and the consultant. Proposed facilities, recommendations, and notes and comments are included for each park where applicable. The small map inset at the upper right of each inventory sheet is included to give the reader a graphic representation of the park's context, size, and adjacent land use. Each inventory sheet also has a scale map of the park on the back. BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 7.6 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: BARBARA CURRY LOCATION: Wescott Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 8.1 Usable 0.0 Developed 0.0 Open Space 8.1 CLASSIFICATION: Conservancy ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family to the east, Patrick Eagan Park to the south, undeveloped to the west, and Wescott Road to the north. EXISTING FACILITIES: • None BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-0 ( AGRICULTURAL LAND • 1 WECOTT ROAD THIS PARK IS NOT YET DEVELOPED / Z--__ TRAIL EASEME ti- Li FIGURE 3 - 2 BARBARA CURRY PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH 3-7 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: BERRY PATCH PARK LOCATION: 1275 Berry Ridge Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 7.6 Usable 1.6 Developed 1.0 Open Space 6.0 CLASSIFICATION: Conservancy ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family on the south and west, agricultural and single family to the north, Patrick Eagan Park to the east. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Walking path in park. Trail extends from Pilot Knob Road along Berry Ridge Road to the park. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • A lift station at the east end of the park sends storm water to Patrick Eagan Park. • The park is two blocks from Patrick Eagan Park. • Potential for future trails connection into Patrick Eagan Park. • • BARTON ASCI-NAAN ASSOCJATILS. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-B • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING 1 AGRICULTURAL FIGURE 3 - 3 BERRY PATCH PARK A I PARK LAYOUT 1994 3-G NOT TO SCALE NORTH 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: BLACKHAWK PARK LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): West access: Riverton Avenue & Palisade Way South access: 1629 Murphy Pkwy. Total 83 Usable 30 Developed 6.5 Open Space 53 CLASSIFICATION: Community Park ADJACENT LAND USE: 211111. : �, 5 1� • Blackhawk Park ems: Single family west and north, agricultural, single family and planned development east. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Canoe Launch • Hiking Trail • Playground • Walking Path • Board Walk • Fishing Dock • CounciUFire Ring PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Parking area (under construction) • Playground • Playfield • Pavilion • Observation Deck • Phase 1 Landscaping (Fall '93) south, Highway 35E RECOMMENDATIONS: • Consider replacement of the existing playground for the neighborhood. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • A lake aerator will be placed in operation to overwinter existing game fish. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-10 c c r c c m 0 RIVERTON AVENUE UJIII r v ra ox BLACKHAWK PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 FIGURE 3 - 4 3.11 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY BRIDLE RIDGE PARK 3990 Elrene Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 20 15 12 5 Surrounded by single-family housing. Wandering Walk Park to the northeast. • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Full) • Hockey Rinks (2) • Playfield • Playground Pleasure Rink Shelter Building (4 season) • Soccer Field • Walking Path • Parking Lot (18 Spaces) g. • Wande Walk Eridle Ridge 1864 nun_ Wandering Walk h F PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Additional trail extension and connections RECOMMENDATIONS: • Add phase 2 planting NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Trail needed to wetlands and undeveloped areas. • Future facilities need for undeveloped area is unclear. • Potential for connecting trail to multi -neighborhoods. • Shelter building for year round programs. • Turf has been slow to develop. • Drainage from the parking lot to the hockey rink is an issue in the winter. • • BART ON A5c MAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN Pad G�- g GP• 1111111111 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NORTHVIEW ROAD CAETON COURTSTL ELREN ROAD 1• SOCCER HARD COURT 1111111111. PARKING LOT I11111II) SHELTER PLAYGROUND 1 TRAIL HOCKEY HOCKEY i FREE SKATE 'i RINK _ •-•. OPEN PLAY TRAIL I „ • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT i BRIDLE RIDGE PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH 3-°13 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: BUR OAKS PARK LOCATION: Chapel Lane & Highway 149 and Rolling Hills Drive SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 58.7 Usable 12.0 Developed 5.0 Open Space 46.7 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family, commerciaUndustrial, and multifamily to the north and west. Single-family to the southeast and southwest. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Ballfield • Playground (2) • Pleasure Rink • Tennis Courts (2) • Walking Path Connecting the North and South Portions • Parking Lot (9 Spaces) PROPOSED FACILITIES: • New playground equipment for the north side RECOMMENDATIONS: • Trail connection as part of a boardwalk over the pond to the east. • Deepening of the south wetland to improve water quality and wildlife habitat • Security lights needed NOTES AND COMMENTS: • No off street parking on the north side. None is needed. • Perceived as two parks. • Older playground equipment on the north side. Brand new playground equipment on the south side. • Access road to lift station gets in the way of winter sliding hill. • Beautiful woods with trail around the pond. • Older housing on the north side. Newer housing on the south side. The slope on the east side of the park is potentially very nice. It would be a good site for more planting. • There is programmed use of the ballfield. • The neighborhood is somewhat isolated and needs the park. It is the only neighborhood park easily accessible to its residents. • There is a need for more planting. • • BART ON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 3•1.4 • BUR OAKS- SOUTH I PROP SED FOOT PATH PLAYGROUND FIGURE 3 - 6 .15 BUR OAKS PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 SOUTH NOT TO SCALE NORTH 1 .77 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY CAPTAIN DODD PARK 4050 Country View Drive Total 15 Usable 6 Developed 6 Open Space 9 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Single-family to the west and north, small business to the south, Highway 3 and railroad to the east. • Ballfield • Walking Path • Hardcourt (Half) • Playground • Parking Lot (10 Spaces) RECOMMENDATIONS: • Phase 2 planting NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Relatively new park (1990). Lots of young families in the area. Topography has changed a great deal in the area. Nice looping trail around the wetland. Programmed use of the ballfield. • • BARTDN ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, PAN 3-1H SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING) • GENERAL BUSINESS • FIGURE 3 - 8 • -19 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: CARLSON LAKE PARK LOCATION: 1303 Carlson Lake Lane SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 12.4 Usable 3.0 Developed 3.0 Open Space 9.4 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing. EXISTING FACILITIES: PROPOSED FACILITIES: 1 rra-'+� Ns���� r, -oastt,iiniessiSi NCI NM iU• = II [ Grita''' p�p� �: t/ - THonnas �;r� ••e :AK cam'" EAST � w�� �� u �►. .1 • Fishing Pier (Observation Deck) on East Side • Playground • Walking Path (Grass/Crushed Aggregate) • Hardcourt (Half) • Install bench along the trail RECOMMENDATIONS: • Turf trail may need asphalt • DNR style 'T" fishing pier located in the park proper NOTES AND COMMENTS: • No space for more development. • Fishing dock new in 1991. • Combines with Oak Chase and Clearwater Parks to serve the neighborhood. • Park has limited access points. • Park has a grass trail on the west side due to neighborhood objection to an asphalt trail. • Carlson Lake offers good fishing potential. It is managed under the Minnesota DNR "Children's Fishing Pond" program. • • • BARTON ASCI*.iAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3-20 • • I l 1 I UTILITY SHEDS FISHING DECK CARLSON LAKE LANE DUNROVIN LANE FIGURE 3 - 9 CARLSON LAKE PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH -12, PARK NAME: LOCATION.: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY CARNEUAN PARK 1800 Carnelian Lane Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 7.5 7.5 7.5 0 Single-family south, north and west, apartments across Blackhawk Road to the east. • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Full) • Hockey Rink (1 Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Shelter Building • Walking Path • Parking Lot (10 Spaces) NOTES AND COMMENTS: • • • trs:Ms-a t2171]trtlrtl H Zd( j//jrfl The park was rebuilt in 1988 from two flat ball fields to a park with rolling topography and trees. More trees are needed along the street edges. The park has enhanced the neighborhood. • • BARTON ASG-MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-22 ea- 3-1VOS 0110N OL - 3211101d 1766L inoAvi >11:1Vd HIBON11NE1Vd NVI-13NEIVO SS3N1S11£1 NNILI A3>100H ,/ 1:331-13HS Nkited V31AY 31VNS 331=1A 3NV1 NV113NEIVO ON-1-S(10H A-11141 316N1S z 0 m • F 0 c • z ONIS11OH A-11141VA 310NIS 0 ianooaav PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY CEDAR POND PARK 2070 Garnet Lane Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 7.7 3.9 3.9 3.8 Surrounded by single-family housing. • Playground • Walking Path • Observation Deck NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park has a picturesque setting. • The large number of geese and ducks is a problem. • Has been used for "Evening in the Park" programs; no longer served by electrical access. • Consider a pond fountain to add interest. • • • SARTON ASCM1MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.24 DIFFLEY ROAD SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 11 PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH 3 - 25 .'• CEDAR POND PARK PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY CINNAMON PARK 4480 Slater Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 7'S 4.0 3.0 3.5 Surrounded by single-family housing and twin homes. ~ Handcourt0HuU} ~ P|ny8o|d ° Playground ° Walking Path NOTES AND COMMENTS: ° Surrounded by a mix of housing types. ~ The park istoo small for baseball which has resulted in some broken windows. Giving the kids n rag ball to play with has helped. ~ Trail connection opportunity toRiver Hills Park. ° Standing water problems inthe north section ofthe park: periodically floods out the trail. BARTON ASCwMAN ASSOMArKS, 1Nr_ PARK SYSTEM PLANj EAGAj*wN • PARK LAYOUT 1994 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BASKETBALL COURT PLAYGROUND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT cc U w cc SLATER ROAD FIGURE 3 - 12 CINNAMON RIDGE PARK PARK NOT TO SCALE, NORTH - 3-27 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY CLEARWATER PARK 4580 Pilot Knob Road Total 13.8 Usable 7.6 Developed 4.4 Open Space 6.2 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park (1/3) ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family north, west, and south, adjacent to Water Treatment Plant. Townhomes east. Parkview Golf Course southeast. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Pleasure Rink (Lighted) • Shelter Building NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Combines with Oak Chase and Carlson Lake Parks to serve the neighborhood. Hockey was removed and changed to open skating. It's a larger surface, well lit and near the road. Seasonal use as a football field is a possibility. • • BARTON ASCHN AN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3•28 • . LXISTING TREES • Z Cc d X \ / WARMING HOUSE �J r SKATING RINK l OPEN PLAY AREA A•4 r FLOOD LIGHTS o • ' EXISTING TREES CLEARWATER PARK A NORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 FIGURE 3 - 13 NOT TO SCALE PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS: 3 INVENTORY COUNTRY HOME PARK 2339 Beam Lane Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 4.3 4.3 4.3 0 Surrounded by single-family, one block from office/industrial area to the north. • Hardcourt (Mini) • Piayfield (With Small Backstop) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Tennis Court (1) NOTES AND COMMENTS: • • • • Curb/Formal Parking _I I I \ 1 III I I CORPORATE DRIyE CTR. WIND AM COR CENTEI NI �II W 4,1 Gravel roads around the park. The number of children in the neighborhood have declined; maturing neighborhood. Park serves as storm water holding. Street lights Tight the skating rink (standardized fixture is needed). Occasional problems with people driving into the park. Older facilities and playground equipment (1985). ;BARTON ASCFIMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-30 • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING SINGL AMILY HOUSING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 14 COUNTRY HOME PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY DOWNING PARK 4352 Johnny Cake Ridge Road Total 15.5 Usable 7.0 Developed 7.0 Open Space 8.5 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Apartments and Oak Ridge School north, single-family and multifamily,west, south, and east. • Ballfield • Playfield • Hardcourt (Half) • Playground • Walking Path RECOMMENDATIONS: • Consider adding an aglime infield and standard backstop on the small field NOTES AND COMMENTS: • • • • Shared with Oak Ridge elementary school. A residential street will be added along the north side of the park. A trail is needed on the north side of the ballfields to keep kids out of neighborhood yards. There are some erosion problems to the pond. The park needs a trail connection to the Highline Trail. Landscaping is needed. MARTON ASCII -MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-32 41 41 • If HIGHLINE TRAIL CORRIDOR 74, PARKING LOT HARD SURFACE PLAY AREA • NSP TRANSMISSION LINES YGROUNP 0 /rREE.S; OAK RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SOFTBALL SOCCER FI SOCCER FIELD MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 15 DOWNING PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NORTH NOT TO SCALE 33 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY EVERGREEN PARK 4359 Lodgepole Drive Total 8.0 Usable 6.0 Developed 6.0 Open Space 2.0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Multifamily/apartments west, single- family housing east and north, Thomas Lake Elementary School west, Thomas Lake Park South. EXISTING FACILITIES: Hardcourt (Full) Playfield Playground Pleasure Rink • Sun Shelter • Walking Path • Tennis Court (2) RECOMMENDATIONS: • Additional landscaping HOM S HE SCHOOL Highline Trail r, r Evergreen Thomas Lake omas Lake East NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Play equipment is older. • Sun shelter is part of well house for south well field. • • ■ARTON ASCH IAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAG AIV, MN 3-34 • OAK RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • • TRAIL TENNIS <O N\A(D FENCE `. 4 COURTS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING \�L n PLAYGROUND I PLEASURE SKATING AREA SUN SHELTER POND FIGURE 3 - 16 EVERGREEN PARK �► NORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE i -35 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: FISH LAKE PARK LOCATION: 3699 Denmark Avenue SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 7.9 Usable 3.0 Developed 2.5 Open Space 4.9 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Single-family south and north, multifamily northeast, Pilot Knob Road west, access on Denmark Avenue. II e:!., _ThSlijAl."11 '2:i•arA . ' J �� dipI Ai Fish V!I� �� ake ,10, � `' ■ice �11 ��w • Fishing Pier • Boat Launch • Playground • Walking Path • Parking Lot (10 regular or 5 car/trailer spaces) NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The trail runs the length of the park. • There is boat access, no gasoline engines are allowed. • An aerator is used at this site to overwinter game fish. • • • !BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-30 • • FISH LAKE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FISHING PIER DENMARK AVENUE TRAIL ASEMENT /LANNED DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 17 a FISH LAKE PARK du CITY • EAGAN k PARK LAYOUT 1994 SCALE 1"=100'-0" /3-37 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY GOAT HILL PARK 4391 Lexington Avenue Total Usable Developed Open Space 22.8 12.0 10.0 10.8 Community Athletic Field Townhomes to the north, single-family to the west. • Baseball Field (2) Major (Lighted With Dugouts) Minor • Walking Path • Hockey Rink (2 - Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Shelter Building (4 Season) • Parking Lot (104 Spaces) • Fields Are Irrigated PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Trails Extension to Lexington/Diffley Site RECOMMENDATIONS: • Concession/Rest Room Building • Permanent Bleachers NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Needs second phase plantings such as vines and hedges and ornamental trees. • Park has tiny tots program year round. • Interesting free skating area around an island, not quite big enough. • Adjacent to the Lexington/Diffley Athletic Fields (to the north). • Across the street from Walnut Hill Park. BARTON ASCF AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3-38 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-4 • • .de.. TTING, EEN JR. BASEBALL FIE EXISTING FOREST BATTING CAG _e PLEASURE BASBALL FIELD PLAYGROUND PARK SHELTER LEXINGTON AVENUE HOCKEY HOCKEY OUTLOT OUTLOT PLANNE D DEV :'MENT FIGURE 3 - 18 °./ GOAT HILL PARK .,ORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE 03-32 .41 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY HEINE POND PARK Diffley Road and Heine Court Total Usable Developed Open Space Special Use 10.5 3.0 3.0 7.5 Multifamily housing north and west, single-family housing south and east. • Canoe Launch (2) • Walking Path • Parking Lot (5 Spaces) PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Phase 1 Planting RECOMMENDATIONS: • Install a DNR style fishing pier to enhance public fishing opportunities NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The pond has good water quality. • Bass and Bluegill fishing is pretty good. BARTON ASCFMAAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 9-40 DIFFLEY ROAD • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT • 41[ ITY EA AN NORT 4/ G PARK LAYOUT 1994 HEINE POND PARK AH SCALE: 1"=30-0" 2 -41 • CANOE LAUNCH HEINE POND FIGURE 3 - 19 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: HIGHLINE TRAIL LOCATION: Extends from Rahn Park to Dodd Park (Approximately 5 miles) SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 43.1 Usable 20.0 Developed 10.0 Open Space 23.1 CLASSIFICATION.' Linear Paris ADJACENT LAND USE: Mostly single-family and multifamily, recreational, and school district. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Multi -Use Trail RECOMMENDATIONS: • Additional rest areas, benches and directional signage may be beneficial • • • QARTON ASCMAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN. MN 3-42 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: HIGHVIEW PARK LOCATION: 1435 Skyline Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 7.2 Usable 6.0 Developed 6.0 Open Space 1.2 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing EXISTING FACILITIES: • Tennis Court (1) • Playfield • Playground • Pleasure Rink (lighted) 'POST NO 3 teteuit ..' ? 4 'Mat: i■. COPHIGRAIDU CEHTEr CORPbRATE DRIVE H VIE rnr Country Home NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Park was refurbished in 1986 (The hockey rink and old warming shelter were removed). • Newer housing on east side. • Declining number of users: primarily a mature neighborhood. • Playground equipment is getting old (1984). • No off street parking due to steep slopes . • Park has an irregular shape: part of the park appears to be hidden. • There is a need for security lighting in the park. • Overstory trees are becoming very prominent, adding character to the park. • • RARTON ASCI-MAN ASSOGATi , INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN! EAGAN, MN 3-44 • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING • • SKYLINE ROAD i PLAYGROUND • 1 PLEASURE SKATING • TENNIS COURT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING 1 1 1 /I SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING JR. BALLFIELD FIGURE 3 - 20 . 2 -4a PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY HOLZ FARM PARK Manor Drive Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 4.8 0 0 4.8 Surrounded by single-family housing and some agricultural, which is planned for residential. • None PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Access to the lake • Playground NOTES AND COMMENTS: • • • • E Park is recent acquisition. Park has a nice sense of scale. Connects visually to the lake . Buildings are not historic but are usable (Eagan farmstead museum opportunity). Farmstead area is buffered by trees and landforms creating an enclosed feeling. • • BAPTON ASCI-MAN ASSOCIATES INC. PARK SYSTEM PIAN; EAGAN, MN 3-4G • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING PLAYGROUND PICNIC AREA • BALLFIELD SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING 1 HARD COURT MANOR DRIVE FIGURE 3 - 21 HOLZ FARM PARK A PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE 3-47 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: 3 INVENTORY KETTLE PARK 4700 Rahn Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 9.5 8.0 8.0 1.5 ADJACENT LAND USE: Highway 35E south and east, twin homes west, commercial to the north. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Full) • Playground • Walking Path • Parking Lot (8 Spaces) i 11 1 /LL 11 I —// / 1 Kettle' (`i m I. 11•n Alilki.ta • gin OIIIIIUQ= um Mir, is 'At 004 • NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Near a proposed Holiday Express Hotel. • Near a mixture of business development. • Surrounded by a mix of housing densities (multi and single family) west and north. • It's the only easily accessible park for the neighborhood. Additional landscape screening along 35E should be pursued with MnDOT. • • • YARTON ASCHIMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-48 • PLA DEVELOPMENT HARD COURT AREA - PLAY AREA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT I / PARKING 11111111 FIGURE 3 - 22 KETTLE PARK NORTH CITY • F EAGAN Ak. PARK LAYOUT 1993 SCALE: 1"=50'- 0" 3-49 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: LAKESIDE PARK LOCATION: 559 Atlantic Hills Drive SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 6.7 Usable 3.5 Developed 3.0 Open Space 2.0 CLASSIFICATION.: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Neighborhood Park Surrounded by single family. //If I tr0l Highline Trail Ct.. AWN; a\Tirt 01:711111:-.11171:11 ..6411 ru1��;1lilNlAN Lakeside • Hardcourt (Half) • Walking Path • Playfield (Small backstop) • Playground • Trail connection to residential and Pinewood Elementary School • Canoe Launch RECOMMENDATIONS: • Landscaping along new trail and stairway —fall 1993 NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Fertile, wet soils. • Path under construction to St. Thomas Beckett Church. • NSP highline wires traverse the northern edge of the site. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE' EAGAN, MN 3-50 POND PLAYGROUND HARDCOURT XIST FI OREST , • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING COMSOS LEAF 1-FtAlt PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS: NOTES AND COMMENTS: 3 INVENTORY LEXINGTON PARK 1030 McKee Street Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 6.6 6.6 6.6 0 Single-family to the west, industrial to the north, east, and south. • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Mini) • Portable Mini Hockey Rink (Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Tennis Court (1) • Additional Landscaping • Security Lighting Needed f�TIIIIIIII1I' f l fl f1III`AI'Th exington EAGANOALr r M R Noe — LONE 01K • Small, older neighborhood; isolated. • Airplane noise is evident. • Long linear buffer separates the houses from an industrial parking lot. It has a tall chain Zink fence with barbed wire on the parking lot side. • Shelter building was removed in 1993. A portable trailer will now be used for a warming house. • Some scheduled use of the ballfield. • There has been increased hockey and skating use. • • • BARTON ASGi4PMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, PAN 3452 KENNETH STREET SINGLE FAMILY HOUS MCKEE STREET KEEFE STREET ING BALLFIELD RAIL i _hi PLAYGROUND ff TENNIS COURT 1 6' FENCE � Y LIGHT INDUSTRIAL • LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FIGURE 3 - 24 PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE =' L E X I N G TO N PARK �,,.OTL PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: PROPOSED FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY LEXINGTON/DIFFLEY ATHLETIC Lexington Avenue/Diffley Road Total Usable Developed Open Space 65 55 0 10 Community Athletic Field Planned development north, south and east. Apartments to the south. Small business district to the east. Abuts Goat Hill Park to the south. • None / a Oak Chase Lexington/ :Diffley Goat Hill 1111111I1I 1' _ >>`yjalnut Hill • Proposed development beginning in 1994 • Softball fields (6) • Soccer Fields (3) • Playfield (1) • Parking • Utilities • Irrigation NOTES AND COMMENTS: • AT&T building provides for city storage. • Trails will be on both sides of Diffley Road. • A Bandy rink has been flooded on the site for the past three winters. • • BARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAf. MN 3-54 0 '.c, / 4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT _) / H SOCCER FIELDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / • 'VOLLEYBALL SOFTBALL SOCCER F 7 SUN SHELTER `LJ L PLAYGROUND CAPONI PROPERTY 0 O cc >- J u_ C: `of 3-55 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY MEADOWLAND PARK 4380 Beaver Dam Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 14 12 12 2 Single-family north, east, and west, multifamily to the south. • Ball Field • Hardcourt (Full) • Playground • Walking Path • Parking Lot (15 Spaces) PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Floating Boardwalk NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park is adjacent to the Highline Trail. More property may be added but it will be dedicated to open space. There is the possibility for a tennis court. There is the potential for a floating boardwalk. There is a potential trail connection to Rahn Park and School. • • MARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 3-60 BEAVER DAM ROAD • • POND HIGH LINE TRAIL WOODS TRAIL PLAYGROUND HARDCOURT BASEBALL FIELD SOCCER FIE PLANNED D ELOPMENT MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 26 MEADOWLAND PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE • NORTH 3.57 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY MOONSHINE PARK Marice Court Total Usable Developed Open Space Neighborhood Park 4.9 1.0 0 4.9 Multifamily south and west, single- family housing to the north. • Undeveloped NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park needs more land. • There is the potential for land acquisition to the south. • Access to LeMay Lake. • Would be a good candidate for an outdoor recreation development grant. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, IATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3-68 • • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING THIS PARK IS NOT YET DEVELOPED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 27 .„• MOONSHINE PARK �► CITY EAGAN NORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY MUELLER FARM PARK Wescott Hills Drive Total 10 Usable 7.5 Developed 7.5 Open Space 2.5 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Surrounded by single-family housing, Woodland Elementary School to the south and west. • Ballfields (2) • Hardcourt • Playground • Soccer Field • Walking Path PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Additional playground equipment • TraiUpicnic area development RECOMMENDATIONS: • Phase 2 landscaping NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Property is owned jointly with School District 196. • School maintains everything next to the school. • Nicely wooded slope to the north. • Trail development with environmental education opportunity. • Picnic area opportunity. • • BARTON AZG-IMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN MN 3-80 • L____ fj PLAY AREA OAK PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL n PARKING / L__ h_ / / PLAYGROUND BALLFIELD PARKING C — _► <-- WESCOTT ROAD --• BALLFIELD SOCCER SINGLE FAMILY PON SING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 28 MUELLER FA R M PARK CITY � EAGAN PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY NORTHVIEW ATHLETIC FIELDS 980 Northview Park Road Total Usable Developed Open Space 64 54 38 10 Community Athletic Field High SchooVMiddle School athletic fields south and east. Single-family north and west. • Shelters (2) • Playground • Softball Fields (8; 4 Lighted) • Sun Shelter/Picnic Area • Tennis Courts (11) • Walking Path • Soccer Fields (2) • Parking Lot (340 Spaces) PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Future lights for tennis courts • Future lighting of Fields 6, 7, and 8 ME id nentrits#: Patrick aitin.tiinliii ���• Eagan •u.II i�iI I MM O Northview [ll SCHOOL SCHOOL NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Drinking fountain needed in the tennis area. • Bleachers perhaps needed in the tennis area (portable or permanent). • Conduits are in for electricity to the tennis courts, but to bring in a new line would be expensive. • Tennis courts and fields are used by the school district and by city leagues. • Trail connects to Northview School and high schooUmiddle school athletic fields. • Trail opportunity to Patrick Eagan Park and to Wandering Walk Park to the east. • The park includes a storage building for the Eagan Athletic Association. • Drainage problems on the north and west sides of the soccer fields. • • BARTON ASCI-MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAG ANI. MN 3-HQ • • NORTHIEW TERRACE AA STORAGE RESTROOM - NORTHVIEW SCHOOL .f� NORTHVIEW PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 FIGURE 3 - 29 NOT TO SCALE NORTH ♦ 3.03 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY OAK CHASE PARK 4400 Oak Chase Road Total Usable Developed Open Space 5.0 4.5 3.0 5.0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park (1/3) ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Playfield • Playground Tennis Courts (2) NOTES AND COMMENTS: • • • COak hase ��111l1!l111 s +tom r !TA.-' kii-AgnibiNliiiji..• Ravine " Combines with Carlson Lake and Clearwater Parks to serve the neighborhood. Park is one of the older parks. Trail opportunity to Ravine Park. Overhead power lines are present in the park and limit tree planting. • • • MARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN • OAK CHASE ROAD • LAYGROUND U ENNIS COURT PROPOSED .& TRAIL UNROVIN PLACE 3-B6 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: GEORGE OHMANN PARK LOCATION: 4730 Pebble Beach Way SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 15.0 Usable 15.0 Developed 14.5 Open Space 0.5 CLASSIFICATION: Community Athletic Field/ Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family north and west, Parkview Golf Course east. • PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE George Ohmann Lebanon Hills EXISTING FACILITIES: • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Half) • Horse Shoe Courts (8) • Playground • Soccer Fields (3) • Sun Shelter/Seasonal Rest Room Building • Parking Lot (120 Spaces) NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Sun shelter building new in 1989. • Horseshoe courts have low use. • Potential trail connection to Lebanon Hills Park, south and east. • • • BARTON ASCFNMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 2 80 • "l� )HORSE OE COUR S PONDING AREA IIIIIIIIII1IIIU SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING PLAYGROUND PARK HARD SHELTER COURT:. 111111111111 PARKING LOT IlllillllflllII 1i 11 III SOCCER FIELD SOCCER FIELD ere i 'i AGRICULTURAL SOFTBALL FIELD SOCCER FIELD TRAIL SOCCER FIELD FIGURE 3 - 31 GEORGE OHMANN PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH a-e7 PARKVIEW GOLF COURS PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS: 3 INVENTORY O'LEARY PARK 3501 Lexington Avenue Total Usable Developed Open Space 16.8 10.0 7.0 6.8 Neighborhood Park Multifamily north and east, single family west and south. • Tennis Courts (2) • Canoe Launch • Hardcourt (Full) • Playgrounds (2) • Small sun shelter with grill (capacity 24) • Footbridge • Walking Path • Parking Lot (10 Spaces) • Additional landscape plantings may be needed on the north side. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • There is some major new multifamily housing going in nearby. • The play structures were built in 1985 and 1988. • There is a problem with drainage across the tennis courts. • Efforts are needed to improve water quality in O'Leary Lake. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, PAN 3-BB • SINGL FAMILY HOUSI G PLAYGROUND OPEN PLAY AREA CANOE LAUNCH 1 FIGURE 3 - 32 • Q-' O'LEARY PARK ;ITY • EAGAN Ho�rH PARK LAYOUT 1994 SCALE 1"=200'-0" 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: PATRICK EAGAN PARK LOCATION: 3995 Lexington Avenue SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 102 Usable 10 Developed 4 Open Space 92 CLASSIFICATION: Community Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: New elementary school and single- family development to the north, single-family to the east and west, and Caponi Art Park to the south. • Cross Country Ski Trail • Hiking Trail PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Opportunity exists to expand the trails system around the north end of McCarthy Lake. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park is undeveloped. • A detailed analysis is needed to help determine what this park should be. A biological inventory should be conducted as part of this study. • An old California style house is part of the property. The house is now rented out. • The park surrounds part of McCarthy Lake. • There is the potential to tie to the Caponi Art Park. • Access from Lexington Avenue. • A small city nursery is located on the site. • Future opportunity for trails connection to Municipal Center/County Library. • Life estate for home on Lexington. • Acquisition of additional property to the north (McCarthy Farm) should be sought to connect the park with the Municipal Center and Barbara Curry Park. BARTON ASCHIV AN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 3.70 • J KEHNE HOUSE TEMPORARY PARKING\\„ II • THIS PARK IS NOT DEVELOPED FIGURE 3 - 33 PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH / 3.71 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: PERIDOT PATH PARK LOCATION: 1790 Turquoise Trail SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 6.2 Usable 5.5 Developed 5.5 Open Space 0.7 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Playground RECOMMENDATIONS: • Additional landscaping. '�� �J• �:'+�•'�;Tqi $` paPi elli w. ,iiP II ,•••';!I-: ....0 1 ;41:4:.4:41:;1'4101211r:1"!.s .0 . 4vi�;4 %; Pendot 10. sie iill4emui ;ii411.- Pathv it i111i.1-nTu• I.IIIIIuI.M...(::CLi1C:i��1l1 ISINBIOrigi Haan. _ Woodhaven NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park serves as a storm detention area. • The neighbors don't want anything except more high quality trees. • The playground gets plenty of use. • • BARTON ASCI-MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3.712 PLAYGROUND SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING • ,\fivaoo\sE • DRAINAGE SWALE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING Q'r FIGURE 3 - 34 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: PILOT KNOB PARK LOCATION: 1475 Towerview Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 10 Usable 6 Developed 4 Open Space 4 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Pilot Knob Elementary to the north, single-family to the west, multifamily to the east, research and development to the south. • Hockey Rink (Lighted) • Tennis Courts (2) • Playfield • Playground (at Pilot Knob Elementary) • Pleasure Rink • Walking Path • Parking Lot (5 Spaces) • Portable Warming Shelter in the Winter RECOMMENDATIONS: • Utilize for nature education for Pilot Knob students. • Additional landscaping. NOTES AND COMMENTS • Needs a more formal connection around the pond to Pilot Knob School. Currently there are not large numbers of children in the area, but when adjacent multifamily goes in there will be more. A trail connection to Quarry would be nice, but difficult because of the road. • Shared facilities with Pilot Knob Elementary School. • School's backstop needs upgrading. • • RARTON ASd#NAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN EAGA N, A114 MN 9-74 • ILY HOUSING PARKING LOT PILOT KNOB ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPEN PLAY AREA ICE SKATING HOCKEY 1 TOWERVIEW ROAD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 35 PILOT KNOB PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 3.75 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: QUARRY PARK LOCATION: 3340 Coachman Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 9.9 Usable 9.9 Developed 9.9 Open Space 0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Paris ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Multiple housing west and north, research and development zoning east, neighborhood business area south. • Ballfield • Hockey Rink (2 - Lighted) • Playground Pleasure Rink • Shelter Building (4 season) • Soccer Field • Walking Path • Parking Lot (22 Spaces) OOACNMAM N IGMLAMC Quarry ?%1I1 �.a -941 PROPOSED FACILITIES: Hard Court (1/2) RECOMMENDATIONS: • Possible future connection with Pilot Knob Park NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The soccer field is suitable for youth play. • The park is very functional and well designed. • • ■ARTON AS HMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAGAN, MN 3-78 • • HARD COURT MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING EXISTING WOODS PLAYGROUND PUMP HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN PLAY AREA SOCCER FIELD BUSINESS AGRICULTURE FIGURE 3 - 36 QUARRY PARK AL NORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE ,,3-77 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: RAHN ATHLETIC FIELDS LOCATION: 4440 Nichols Road South; 4425 Sandstone Drive SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 60 Usable 45 Developed 27 Open Space 15 CLASSIFICATION: Community Park/Athletic Field ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Single-family north, community shopping south and east, multifamily south, planned development and Rahn Elementary School east. East side of park Ballfield (2) • Hardcourt (Full) • Hockey Rink (2 - Lighted) • Pleasure Rink • Shelter Building (2) • Tennis Court (4 - Lighted) • Parking Lot (159 Spaces - 2 Lots) West side of park • Sun Shelter (With Restrooms) • Baseball Field (1) • Sand Volleyball Court (2) • Softball Field (3) • Walking Path RECOMMENDATIONS: • Design/layout of the ballfields on the east side needs re-examination. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The biggest problem is not enough parking at the athletic site. • At one time a community pool was considered for this site. • The tiny tots tot lot is popular. • The July 4th celebration takes a heavy toll on the grass, and park sanitation is problem. • Rahn School has run some wood chip trails into the park. • More definition is needed as to what can and should happen in the wooded area with regard to educational opportunities. • Park can be seen as 2/3rds athletic and 1/3rd conservation. • There are 3 access points. • Possible access opportunities to senior housing to the south. • Possible opportunity for sun shelter/pavilion in the wooded area. • Need to provide some common elements to "bridge" the two sides of the park. • ADA issues with the shelter building. • • • BARTON ASCIiMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE; EAGAN, MN 7.7E1 NICHOLS ROAD MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING :„ CITY TRAIL )EVELOI I f TENNIS COURTS BALLFIELD 1 VOLLEYBALL PARK SHELTER PLEASURE RIN\ 1 - SUN SHELTER ®/ HOCKEY RINK BALLFIELD BALLFIELD TRAIL 0 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING SANDSTONE DRIVE RHAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RAHN PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 FIGURE 3 - 37 10°° NORTH NOT TO SCALE i3r7a • RHAN PARK cc SANDSTONE DRIVE PARKING LOT RAHN� ELEMENTARY 1 SCHOOL BALLFIELD n RAHN ROAD • FIGURE 3 - 38 PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY RAVINE PARK East of Lexington Ave. between Parkview Ln. and Tiffany Dr. Total Usable Developed Open Space 14.2 3.0 0.0 11.2 Conservancy Surrounded by single-family housing. • None • Oak [O Chase glia ejs •n• ei111M1111 i II. Sr' • . !. Kliagp rt Ravine Goat Hill lizA,to. ilezz it, sr IN • Walnut Hill ■ • • Lebanon Hills_ NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Potential for trails development between Oak Chase Park and Lexington Avenue. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAGAN, MN 3 -82 SINGLE • / 1 • FAMILY t HOUSING Q POND POND 1. POND, T/P PO/NT PROPOSED TRAILWAY IFFAN CIRCLE OUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 39 RAVIN E PARK CITY EAGAN ►roaTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE of 3-83 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: RIDGECUFF PARK LOCATION: 1750 Covington Lane SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 16.6 Usable 15.0 Developed 15.0 Open Space 1.6 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Single-family and townhomes to the north, west, and east, Lebannon Hills Park to the south. • Ballfield • Hockey Rink (Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Tennis Court (2) • Walking Path • Parking Lot (16 Spaces) RECOMMENDATIONS: • Phase 2 landscaping of the southern section. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Needs hardcourt. • Poor soils (rock and clay). • Slope to the road from the upper level is too steep for soccer. It could be regraded to make it more usable. • Trail opportunity to loop into Lebannon Hills Park. • Consider extending existing trail to Johnny Cake Ridge Road. • • • ■ARTON AS HMAN ASSOCJATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 3-84 •ORDER FENCE LEBANON HILLS • REGKONAL PARK HOCKEY RINK FREE SKATE AREA SINGLE TENNIS COURT PARKING LO T \ PLAYGROUND FAMILY HOUSING HAUGE CIRCLE KARIS WAY COVINGTON LANE FIGURE 3 - 40 RIDGECLIFF PARK NORTH PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE v..3-135 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: RIVER HILLS PARK LOCATION: 4343 Metcalf Drive SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 4.1 Usable 4.1 Developed 4.1 Open Space 0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Hardcourt (Mini) • Playfield • Playground • Walking Path MEM nro4E 1 MARI NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Playground equipment is getting old. • Park is surrounded by houses. • There are two narrow access points. • Park is one block from Metcalf Jr. High School and two blocks from Cinnamon Park. • • BARTON A5CFMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3-BB s. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING VOLLEYBALL BASKETBALL PRACTICE COURT PLAYGROUND OPEN PLAY AREA PICNIC METCALF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 41 PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE ..00 3-137 RIVER HILLS PARK NORTH 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: SKY HILL PARK LOCATION: 3590 Blue Cross Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 12 Usable 10 Developed 8 Open Space 2 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Planned development west and east, Blue Cross Blue Shield north, single- family south. • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Full) • Hockey Rink (2 - Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Shelter Building (4 Season) • Walking Path • Tennis Court (2) • Parking Lot (27 Spaces) PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Observation Deck NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The park contains one of the city's high points. A viewing area is needed. • More trees are needed. oARTON ASCHNAAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3•G8 ZONED SINGLE FAMIL • HOCKEY HOCKEY r-- L SOCCER PLAY ROUND OBSERVATION PLAZA ZONED LIMITED BUSINESS ZONE° LIMITED BUSINESS FIGURE 3 - 42 r -8 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: SLATER ACRES PARK LOCATION: 2185 James SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 8.5 Usable 4.3 Developed 4.3 Open Space 4.2 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Single-family south and west, planned multiple development north, Highway 77 east. • Hardcourt (Half) • Playfield • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Walking Path NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Beautiful Oak woods. • Topography is rolling in character. • Opportunity for picnic structure which would have to be carefully sited in order to minimize freeway noise. • Adjacent property to the north is zoned multiple. • There is no buffer to that possible development (north). • Skating rink gets moderate use. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN. MN 3-SO • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SLATER ROAD - - FREE SKATE AREA SLIDING HILL EXISTING WOODS HARDCOURT PLAYGROUND \ EXISTING WOODS OUTLOT FIGURE 3 - 43 EAGAN NOT TO SCALE NORTH 3.tal SLATER ACRES PARK POP PARK LAYOUT 1994 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): 3 INVENTORY SOUTH OAKS PARK 675 North Hay Lake Road Total Usable Developed Open Space 4.6 4.1 4.1 0.5 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Canoe Launch With Retaining Wall • Hardcourt (Half) • Playground • Soccer Field • Walking Path • Parking Lot (5 Spaces) Trapp Farm IIIII Highline Trail 'P,VII Lakeside ,� 111roto4 1 7 , mo rrw\� ,sib J_ I,1'Ij\�ll I11% lW . augur • RECOMMENDATIONS: • Tennis Courts • Landscape Design and Implementation NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Expanded in 1986. • Older neighborhood (late 1960's - early 1970's). • Utilizes trailer for recreation programs. • Park has an open, town square -like character. • Tennis courts could go in here if needed. • Park abuts Hay Lake. • Large retaining wall constructed in 1986. • Potential site for skating rink. BARTON ASCF'vAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN • SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING HAY LAKE ARDCOURT OPEN PLAY SOCCER FIELD OVERHILL ROAD SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING w EE 0 u_ w J Z w w CC C7 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING FIGURE 3 - 44 -,. .V SOUTH OAKS PARK V�Q �ITY � EAGAN �M PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE 3-93 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS: 3 INVENTORY THOMAS LAKE PARK 4425 Pilot Knob Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Community Paris 59.5 12.0 6.0 47.5 Single-family housing north, south, and east, apartment complex west. • Canoe Launch • Fishing Dock • Hiking Trail • Pavilion • Sun Shelter (Pump House) • Grill (2) • Parking Lot (68 Spaces) • Native Prairie • Install DNR style fishing pier on the peninsula. • Consider interpretive "plaza" and trails within the prairie. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • There is a beautiful new rest room building and pavilion. • Thomas Lake School is close. • There is a trail link to Highline Trail. • The sun shelter has potential to be a "trailhead" for the Highline Trail. • • • BARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-D4 TRAIL TRAIL -/Z POND DOCK NATIVE PRAIRIE ,XISTING FOREST POND UN SHELTER PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS LAKE ( FIGURE 3 - 45 THOMAS LAKE PARK PARK LAYOUT 1993 NORTH SCAL: 1"=150' PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: 3 INVENTORY THOMAS LAKE EAST PARK North of Lakeside Drive off of Pilot Knob Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Conservancy 7.0 4.2 1.0 2.8 ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing, Thomas Lake Park to the west. EXISTING FACILITIES: • None NOTES AND COMMENTS: • The lake is regularly fished by neighborhood youth. Icon �. •� a.. iiEGi • Amen omas 301'•! Lake ;.�i,4 East :' ' kit% Nft n MINN 4a:111 .47: �11 earwater '•• .MI MI •ARTON AsCI-■MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-QS • THIS PARK IS NOT DEVELOPED CHES MAR CIRCLE THOMAS LAKE EAST PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 FIGURE 3 - 46 NORT NOT TO SCALE 3-07 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: PROPOSED FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY TRAPP FARM PARK (including Oak Pond Hills Park) 841 Wilderness Run Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Community Park 59.5 25.0 12.0 34.5 Surrounded by planned unit development and single-family housing. Farm ►than I,nl.i ►.ntte 031.16" . �.p1rrso iI mice)411 :.a a`ti • Canoe Launch • Portable Dock • Pavilion with Grills and Fireplaces (2) (Capacity 180) • Playfield • Playground • Shelter Building (4-season) • Tubing Hill with Lighting • Walking Path • Parking Lot (123 Spaces) • Sand Volleyball • Amphitheater (informal) • Trail development to single family to the north • Fishing pier • Picnic shelter • Amphitheater stage RECOMMENDATIONS: • Implementation of watershed projects to improve water quality. • Phase 2 landscaping along west hillside. NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Beautiful shelter building (1986). • Connects to Highline Trail. • Very busy community park/high versatility. • Evening concert in the park events. Trail opportunity to Walnut Hill Park. Additional picnic shelter opportunity. • Undeveloped parcel across Wilderness Run Road. • Drainage problems between the amphitheater and the playground. • NSP highline towers cross the park. • An aerator is used at this site for overwintering of game fish in Fish Lake. • • • YARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATUS. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN! EAGAN. MN 7-1;18 SLEDDING HILL \\ APARK SHELTER SCHWANZ LAKE TRAPP FARM PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE NORTH TRAPP FARM PARK • • LANNED', UNIT DEV ENT THIS PARK IS NOT DEVELOPED SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LYNX COURT LANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 48 OAK POND HILLS PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 SCALE 1"=200'-0" NORTH 43.101 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION:: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY WALDEN HEIGHTS PARK Total Usable Developed Open Space 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 Neighborhood Park Agricultural west, single-family north, east, and south. • Undeveloped NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Park will be expanded when west subdivision is added. • Park occupies the corner lot as you enter the neighborhood, It could provide identity. • • • BARTON ASCI-MAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3 -10E CLIFF ROAD AGRICULTURE • RICHARD'S COURT r THIS PARK IS NOT DEVELOPED Sit Gt-e F ' HOUgWG 3-103 PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS: 3 INVENTORY WALNUT HILL PARK 999 Wilderness Run Road Total Usable Developed Open Space 25.8 20 11 5.8 Neighborhood Park Surrounded by single-family housing, Goat Hill Park to the west. Goat Hill Walnut Hill ll�i iiiii���,�i i • Archery Range • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Half) • Playground • Sun Shelter with Grill (Capacity 24) • Walking Paths (Bituminous and Aggregate) • Parking Lot (22 Spaces) • Consider pond fountain/aerator • Additional landscaping NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Park has community -wide use. • Needs new/additional playground equipment. • There should be a trail on both sides of Lexington. • Trail connection opportunity to Trapp Farm Park. • Excavated pond with walking trail serves as a focal point. • The park is crossed by overhead power lines. • • YARTON ALI:HAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 9 -104 GOAT HILL PARK • • FIGURE 3 - 50 CITY s. 1 F EAGAN WALNUT HILL PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NORTH POO NOT TO SCALE PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): CLASSIFICATION: ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: 3 INVENTORY WANDERING WALK PARK Northview Park Road, Elrene Road, and Wescott Road Total Usable Developed Open Space Linear Park 30 5 0 25 Surrounded by single-family housing. • None PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Trail development • • SARTON ASCIMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. NMI 3-106 WESCOTT ROAD • PLANNED DEVELOPMEN 1 OUTLOT I / TO BRIDLE / RIDGE PAR *t THIS PARK IS NOT DEVELOPED r 1 i PLANNED EVELOPMEN s 3.107 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: LOCATION: SIZE (IN ACRES): WESCOTT STATION PARK Ridgewood Drive Total 31.8 Usable 15.0 Developed 15.0 Open Space 16.8 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Paris ADJACENT LAND USE: West Publishing north and east. Single-family south and west. EXISTING FACILITIES: • Ballfield • Hardcourt (Half) • Playground (ADA Accessible) • Soccer Field • Walking Path PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Wildlife Observation Deck Oa lkik_ Wescott Station el 1111&41144. diasirAvtiert "7:: 1144 ala;1‘eler:i115:* I WEST Pl.! 1st AD NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Tall chain Zink fence on West Publishing's property line is an intrusion on the park. • Park was new in 1990. • Some scheduled use of the ballfield (irritating to neighbors). • Native seed mix was used in some areas. • Lots of land, slopes, trees, ponds, and wildflowers. • Potential for more trails and perhaps a picnic area. • City should begin programming soccer field. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE; EAGAN, MN 3-10B oz/ • POND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 3 - 52 • • 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: WESCOTT SQUARE COMMONS LOCATION: Ivy Lane SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 1.0 Usable 1.0 Developed 0.0 Open Space 1.0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by high density multifamily housing. PROPOSED FACILITIES: • Volleyball (Lawn) • Hardcourt (1/2) • Playground • Lawn/Open Space • Walking Path :ARRIAGE HILLS GOLF COURSE IA` NOS Wescott — Common w • �II4 Ilt ililliiti t. WE9COTT GARDEN NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Low income housing project with 21 different property owners. • Owners have cooperated to agree on the programming of the space. • Housing is clustered around vehicular circulation and parking. • Construction drawings are being finished for 1994 construction start on the park. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN , MN 3-110 • • MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING RAIL OPEN PLAY AREA 0-- MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING W rr CY O co PARKING BASKETBALL COURT FIGURE 3 — 53 WESCOTT COMMONS PARK PARK LAYOUT 1994 NORTH NOT TO SCALE • - - • 3-111 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: WINDCREST PARK LOCATION: Denmark Ave. and Crestview Ln. SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 12.3 Usable 3.0 Developed 0.0 Open Space 9.3 CLASSIFICATION: Conservancy ADJACENT LAND USE: Single-family to the west and south. Civic complex and Glacier Hills School to the north. Patrick Eagan Park to the east. EXISTING FACILITIES: • None NOTES AND COMMENTS: • Trail opportunity from City Hall to Patrick Eagan Park. Patrick Eagan TCHI • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN= EAGAN, MN 3-112 • PLANNED D THIS PARK IS NOT YET DEVELOPED FIGURE 3 - 54 PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE - WINDCREST PARK 'NORrH ,ITY • EAGAN 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: WOODHAVEN PARK LOCATION: Gold Trail and Beryl Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 24 Usable 15 Developed 11 Open Space 9 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: EXISTING FACILITIES: Community shopping area and apartments west, planned development and townhomes north, single-family south and east. • Ballfields (2) • Hockey Rink (Lighted) • Playground • Pleasure Rink • Tennis Courts (2) • Walking Path • Parking Lot (18 Spaces) Woodhaven NOTES AND COMMENTS: • A new road with a parking lane for 12 cars will help the parking problem for the upper ballfield. The parking lot on the Gold Trail side does not serve the ballfield and hockey rink well. • The park has nice topography and a pond and is enclosed by trees. • The housing in the area is mid 1960's single- and multifamily. • The playground equipment is getting older (1986). • The ballfields get quite a bit of use. • • • BARTON ASCF-UMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-114 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING O O GOLD TRAIL 1 / PLEASURE RINK 1 / \ / BALLFIELD PLAYGROUND MULTIPLE HOUSI FAMILY• NG O`r • ENNIS COURTS O�\J \ SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING �r• SINGLE FAMILY 40• USING FIGURE 3 - 55 O J ITY EAGAN WOODHAVEN PARK 4k.„ • PARK LAYOUT 1994 NOT TO SCALE 3-136 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: UNNAMED LOCATION: Oak Circle SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 6.3 Usable 6.3 Developed 0.0 Open Space 0.0 CLASSIFICATION: Neighborhood Park ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family. EXISTING FACILITIES: • None. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE; EAGAN, MN 3.116 INVENTORY •ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAOAN, MIN 3.117 3 INVENTORY PARK NAME: UNNAMED LOCATION: East of Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Ridgecliff Park to Cliff Road SIZE (IN ACRES): Total 4.8 Usable 0.0 Developed 0.0 Open Space 4.8 CLASSIFICATION: Conservancy ADJACENT LAND USE: Surrounded by single-family housing. Follows Williams Bros. pipeline. EXISTING FACILITIES: • None. PROPOSED FACILITIES: • None. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PI -AN UPDATE; EAGAN, MN 9.99E • • • 3 INVENTORY • SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES Schools are an important resource of recreation space and facilities in many communities. Activities involving school facilities tend to be more social in nature, that is, recreation with team structure and competitive recreation. In addition to providing schoolwide, communitywide, and statewide structure for competitive recreation for students, school facilities can be utilized by other organized groups. There are a total of 14 public schools in three school districts within Eagan city limits. These districts include Burnsville Independent School District 191, Apple Valley/Eagan/Rosemount Independent School District 196, and West St. Paul. Ten of the schools are elementary, three are middle school or junior high, and there is one high school. Their facilities are utilized through- out the year by youth and adult leagues in sports such as soft- ball, volleyball, basketball, baseball, soccer, and swimming. School facilities are also utilized frequently on weeknights and some weekends by the community in general. Popular uses include swimming lessons, open swim, and open gym. Schools are also important centers for cultural and entertainment recreation activities such as plays, concerts, carnivals, festivals, etc. Figure 3.56 is a map showing the locations and types of all public schools within the City of Eagan. The school district boundaries are shown as dashed lines. It is clear from the map that some areas have better access to school facilities than others. Almost all of the schools are located in a two-mile wide band parallel to Diffley Road in the southern part of the city. The northern half of the city has only one school, Pilot Knob Elementary. Table 3.2 lists each school and its facilities. The totals for each type of facility are listed at the bottom of the chart. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 9-118 3 INVENTORY TABLE 3.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT ATHLETIC FACILITIES UTILIZED BY EAGAN RESIDENTS (1993) School Mini Soccer L e� O ci)fs Overlay Soccer _ oi O O Gymnasium O O G. d VN N R _V v l7 on Baseball Class B Tennis Softball Ballfield a Playground o L Et ISD 191 Rahn Elementary 1 1 1 2 1 Cedar School 1 4 1 Metcalf Junior High 1 1** 1 2 5 7 1 ISD 196 Thomas Lake Elementary 1 1 1 2 1 Deerwood Elementary 1 1 2 1 Glacier Hills Elementary 2 1 2 1 Northview Elementary 1 1 2 1 Oak Ridge Elementary 1 Pinewood Elementary 1 2 1 Woodland Elementary 1 1 Eagan High School 1 3 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 Dakota Middle School 2 1 1 1 4 1 Blackhawk Middle School 2* 1* 1* 1* 2* 4* 1* 1* Elementary School 18*** 2 2 ISD 197 Pilot Knob Elementary 1 1 1 1 TOTALS 1 2 17 5 13 3 1 12 9 1 28 9 4 * Denotes Under Construction ** Denotes Little Eagan Community Use ** * Denotes School/Park Facility to Open 9/1/95 • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.120 • • INGTON Ps is aw•wwwiti are sit wit-s fa -a it *a trat my urn is am Ex a II APPLE VALLEY � C� 3 INVENTORY FIGURE 3-56 SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES LEGEND Elan Mft SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY HIGH SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CIVIC COMPLEX PARKLAND EAGAN SCHOOLS DISTRICT 191 I. RAHN ELEMENTARY 2. CEDAR SCHOL 3. METCALF JUNIOR HIGH DISTRICT 196 4. THOMAS LAKE ELEMENTARY 5. DEERWOOD ELEMENTARY 6. GLACIER HILLS ELEMENTARY 7. NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY 8. OAK RIDGE ELEMENTARY 9. PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY 10. WOODLAND ELEMENTARY II. EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL 12. DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL 13. BLACK HAWK MIDDLE SCHOOL 14. UNNAMED ELEMENTARY DISTRICT 197 15. PILOT KNOB ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT KEY PLAN J-1 �— r 197 196 --I rJ I� PAPK SYSTEME PLAN. EAGAN. MN • • 3 INVENTORY • REGIONAL PUBLIC PARK AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES In addition to park and open space facilities owned by the City of Eagan, there are several regional facilities that are easily accessible to Eagan residents. These regional facilities provide amenities that are important in unique ways and need to be considered when studying the recreational opportunities for Eagan residents. They provide areas for conservancy, habitat, historical preservation, as well as other special features. They are managed by State, Federal, County, or City governments. State and Federal Facilities Minnesota Valley National VVildlife Refuge (US Fish and VVildlife) Bordering the northwest corner of Eagan lies the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge is managed by the United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Many residents do not realize what a vast and precious resource this is. Within this 34-mile corridor of marsh, grassland, and forest stretching from Fort Snelling to Jordan there are miles of hiking, biking, horseback riding, and cross- country skiing trails. Within the corridor are nine identified refuge areas, each with its own unique ecosystem and self -guided tour. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is currently developing plans to acquire the remaining 6,888 acres of land within the approved refuge boundaries. Facilities include: / Hiking, biking, horseback riding, and cross-country ski trails ✓ Interpretive center / Picnic facilities / Environmental education program Minnesota Valley State Trail (Minnesota DNR) The lower Minnesota River Valley is located between Fort Snelling and LeSueur, Minnesota. Twenty-four thousand acres of floodplain marsh, grassland, and woodland will eventually be included within the state park, state trail, and the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. When completed, nearly 75 miles of trails will traverse parts of Hennepin, Dakota, Scott, Carver, Sibley, and LeSueur Counties. The trail will follow the Minnesota River from Fort Snelling State Park to the City of LeSueur. At this time, only the portion of the trail system from BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.123 3 INVENTORY Belle Plaine to Chaska and Shakopee is completed. Facilities include: ✓ Bicycle trail ✓ Boat launch ✓ Canoeing ✓ Camping ✓ Fishing / Hiking trails ✓ Picnic facilities ✓ Cross-country ski trails ✓ Snowmobile trails Fort Snelling State Park (Minnesota DNR) Located just northwest of Eagan, Fort Snelling State Park offers a rich recreational and historical experience. The old fort sits on the bluff above the junction of the Mississippi and Minnesota Rivers. The Minnesota Historical Society offers daily cultural and historical programs. The park itself includes Snelling Lake and Pike Island. Facilities include: ✓ Hiking, bicycle, and cross-country ski trails ✓ Fishing (handicapped accessible) ✓ Boat launches ✓ Volleyball courts ✓ Swimming beach ✓ Picnic facilities ✓ Interpretive center ✓ Nature trail ✓ Historic Fort Snelling / Canoe and paddleboat rental Minnesota Zoological Garden (State of Minnesota) The Minnesota Zoo is a 465-acre zoological garden located just south of the City of Eagan. It is open year-round and offers cross-country skiing in the winter. Eagan residents also have access to the zoo by means of trails on both Galaxie Avenue and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Facilities include: ✓ Zoological garden ✓ Picnic facilities ✓ Cross-country skiing ✓ Environmental education programs ✓ Large group facilities • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EA(9AN, MN 3-124 • • • 3 INVENTORY County Facilities Lebanon Hills Regional Park (Dakota County) Lebanon Hills is a park that offers something for everyone. Located at the boundaries of Apple Valley, Eagan, and Rosemount, it is easily accessible to Eagan residents. It is operated by the Dakota County Parks Department. Facilities include: ✓ Canoeing / Fishing / Hiking trails / Horseback riding trails / Interpretive nature trails / Picnic facilities / Cross-country ski facilities Murphy-Hanrehan Park Reserve (Hennepin Parks/Scott County) Located in the northeast part of Scott County on the Scott and Dakota County line, the total park reserve size will be 2,827 acres when fully acquired. Murphy-Hanrehan Park Reserve can best be interpreted in a geological sense as representing the Highland zone at the point of splitting the Grantsburg sublobe of the Des Moines lobe of the fifth and last Wisconsin glacial period in Minnesota. This would represent one of the most significant events in the geologic history of the metropolitan area. Facilities include: / Four -season trailhead building / Cross-country ski trails ✓ Horse and snowmobile trails ✓ Hiking trails / Natural resource protection areas ✓ Picnic area/swimming (proposed) / Outdoor recreation center (proposed) ✓ Campground (proposed) / Group camp (proposed) Hyland -Bush -Anderson Lakes (Hennepin Parks) Located in the south-central portion of Hennepin County, the park is bounded on the north by Interstate 494 and Nine Mile Creek and lies west of Normandale Boulevard and east of State Highway 169. The Hyland -Bush -Anderson Lakes Park Reserve is comprised of several units: Hyland Lake, North Corridor, South Corridor, Tierny's Woods, Anderson Lakes, Bush Lake, BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-125 3 INVENTORY and Normandale Lake. The combined park size will total 2,513 acres when fully acquired. Facilities include: ✓ Four -season outdoor recreation center / Creative play area ✓ Boat launch ✓ Picnic areas ✓ Hyland Hills downhill ski area / Bush Lake ski jump ✓ Group camp ✓ Paved trails ✓ Cross-country ski trails ✓ Swimming beach ✓ Boat launch ✓ Nature interpretive center (proposed) ✓ Natural resource protection areas Battle Creek Regional Park (Ramsey County) Located in the southeast corner of Ramsey County, Battle Creek Regional Park is comprised of four segments: Indian Mounds (97 acres); Fish Hatchery (105 acres); Pigs Eye (1,121 acres); and Battle Creek (847 acres). The park derives its name from Battle Creek, which runs from east to west through the length of the park on its way to the Mississippi River. The park includes approximately two miles of bluff land along the east side of the Mississippi River corridor. Facilities include: ✓ Picnic facilities / Hiking and cross-country ski trails ✓ Bicycle trails ✓ Snowshoeing Cleary Lake Regional Park (Hennepin Parks/Scott County) Located in east -central Scott County, the park is bounded on the east by County Road 27, County 87 to the west, and County Road 42 on the north. The park site encompasses a total land area of approximately 1,048 acres. Recreational use of Cleary Lake is the primary focal point in this regional park. Facilities include: ✓ Picnic area ✓ Swimming beach ✓ Golf course / Driving range ✓ Group camps (6) ✓ Boat launch / Bicycle/hiking trails • • MARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-12115 e • • 3 INVENTORY ✓ Connecting link to countywide trail system / Cross-country ski trails / Interpretive trails Spring Lake Park Reserve (Dakota County) Located west of Hastings off County Road 42, Spring Lake Park Reserve is a study in contrasts from the Oak Woods and the high rocky bluff tops, with elevations rising more than 100 feet above the Mississippi River, to the floodplain with its grasses and Black Walnut trees. Trails provide outstanding views of the Spring Lake section of the river. A unique feature of the park is an archery trail with 28 shooting stations of varying distances and difficulties. Facilities include: / Picnic shelters / Hiking and cross-country ski trails / Swimming / Archery / Large fire ring City Facilities Minnehaha Park (City of Minneapolis) Encompassing approximately 170 acres, the park includes Minnehaha Falls, thickly wooded groves, shaded lawns, picnic facilities, a bandstand, springs of pure water, and a creek that empties into the Mississippi River. Statues, a historic house, and train station add to the park's interest. Facilities include: ✓ Hiking and cross-country ski trails / Picnic facilities Nokomis -Hiawatha Park (City of Minneapolis) Located near the southern border of Minneapolis, Nokomis - Hiawatha Park provides a variety of recreational opportunities. Lake Nokomis is a popular spot for swimming, sailing, and fishing. The park is bisected by a regional trail corridor (Minnehaha Park to the east and Minneapolis Chain of Lakes to the west). Facilities include: / Sailing ✓ Fishing / Boat Launch / Hiking and cross-country ski trails / Swimming / Skating / Picnic facilities BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-127 3 INVENTORY Lilydale Harriet Island (City of St. Paul) The Harriet Bishop Playground is among the most extensive play lots in St. Paul. It offers a paddleboat-shaped climbing area, a track ride, and many traditional pieces of playground equipment. The park is named after pioneer school teacher Harriet Bishop. In 1900, Dr. Justus O'Hage, who owned the land, improved the island by constructing public baths to improve sanitary conditions for the City's populace. The land was later turned over to the City with the provision that it remain forever in public use. Facilities include: ✓ Boat launch / Power boating ✓ Canoeing / Fishing / Hiking trails / Skating ✓ Picnic facilities ✓ Playground Hidden Falls -Crosby Farm (City of St. Paul) Open year-round, the Crosby Farm Park Nature Center offers nature programming for school classes and groups, special events, and family events. There is a small fee for children's classes. School groups are free. A self -guided trail with numbered posts has been installed in the park, and users can purchase trail guides to educate themselves on Crosby's plants and wildlife. / Hiking, bicycle, and cross-country ski trails / Boat launch ✓ Power boating / Canoeing / Fishing ✓ Picnic facilities Como Park (City of St. Paul) Como Zoo Como Zoo is open 365 days a year. There is no admission fee and no charge for parking. Como Park Conservatory The conservatory has four display areas, featuring the blooming plant collection in the sunken garden. A small admission is charged year round. Facilities include: • BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 3.12B • • • 3 INVENTORY / Bicycle trails ✓ Canoeing ✓ Golf ✓ Hiking and cross-country ski trails ✓ Interpretive trails ✓ Picnic facilities ✓ Swimming ✓ Ice fishing ✓ Snowshoeing ✓ Ice skating ✓ Downhill skiing BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAGAN, MN 3.129 3 INVENTORY BARYON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 3.130 4... CEpi[ ST. i" WEST SAINT EI PAUL 11.E1T.a,. ++r, nMTN ST. a r Shodv Us E0 E M , HO KINS E LSCa3I011 n. adoavhrooi L.we 1yy _ \horror Calhoun EDINA 1 - SAVAGE nao Ed�rc.j MT x ST. WI x ST LOOMIN. TON Pnwoernor 1STr 11 MTe IAu 6chne, J ^ _ . e TOT H ST - a FIELD r,; Ba.TQxO Y SI - 1MIM S• Orchard arden I.A U' ST FALCON HEIGHTS: Au x,Gx,ss 101T DIMING AnoeM CM/MT i APPLE VALLEY' as SOUT PANT UL SWTMMIEa Ian. U� INVER GROVE HEIGHTS rAS 8-. r� ss�a.Ti. Syr J P. Eye Lake - IST. AS COATES Lake x1SEY 3 INVENTORY FIGURE 3-57 REGIONAL PUBLIC RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR EAGAN RESIDENT! LEGEND State and Federal Facilities I MINNESOTA VALLEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 2 MINNESOTA VALLEY STATE TRAIL 3 FORT SNELLING STATE PARK 4 MINNESOTA ZOOLOGICAL GARDEN County Facilities 5 LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK 6 MURPHY-HANREHAN PARK RESERVE 7 HYLAND-BUSH-ANDERSEN LAKES 8 BATTLE CFEEK REGIONAL PARK 9 CLEARY LAKE REGIONAL PARK 10 SPRING LAKE PARK RESERVE City Facilities I I MINNEHAHA PARK 12 NOKOMIS-HIAWATHA PARK 13 LILYDALE HARRIET ISLAND 14 HIDDEN FALLS-CROSBY FARM 15 COMO PARK 16 CHAIN OF LAKES PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 3 - 131 so • • 3 INVENTORY • ADDITIONAL RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES Recreation Supplier's Inventory This section of the Park System Plan offers an in-depth review of facilities and services provided by various recreation suppliers, located in and around the City of Eagan. These providers are broadly categorized into the following groups: public indoor, private indoor/outdoor, commercial recreation, historic sites, and nature centers. The review includes a discussion of each providers' facilities, program offerings, fee structures (where available), and future collaborative opportunities with the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. PUBUC INDOOR Included in this section is a discussion of public indoor facilities provided by city, county, and school district agencies in the City of Eagan. City Owned Paris Shelters The city has five park shelters available for reservations. These shelters are located in Bridle Ridge, Goat Hill, Quarry, Sky Hill, and Trapp Farm Parks. The shelters at Bridle Ridge and Goat Hill are used extensively for pre-school programs and are not always available for reservations. Reservation fees are currently (1994) $65.00 for a half day and $95.00 for a full day with a $150.00 damage deposit. All of the shelters provide restrooms and are fully enclosed and heated. The Trapp Farm Park shelter also has a fireplace to enhance the meeting space atmosphere. These shelters are available year round. However, during the winter months they all are used as warming shelters for winter activity centers, and may not be reserved when in use. Summer recreation programs and special events are also staged out of the shelters on a regular basis. Reservations for all Park Shelters can be made beginning the first business day of each year, through the City's Park and Recreation Department. Fire Administration The City's community room housed in the fire administration building is located on Pilot Knob Road directly across from the Municipal Center. The Community Room is a public facility which provides seating for about 60 people at tables and large groups for lecture presentations. Rest rooms, pop and candy machines are also provided. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-133 3 INVENTORY City programs which are held in the Fire Administration Building include fire department meetings and training and Parks and Recreation programs. These programs include senior citizens meetings, dog obedience, games kids play, special seminars, and staff training. The Community Room can also be reserved for private use. Some typical users include: homeowner associations, youth athletic associations (officials' training, equipment exchanges), and scout groups. Fees for private use are $50 for non-profit community use events and $100 for profit and fund raising events. Typically, one to two private reservations occur each month. The Community Room may be reserved for private groups on a short-term basis. For example, a new church many reserve the room for Sunday activity, but not for a period exceeding a six- month term. Fire Stations The two new fire stations, #4 and #5, include small meeting room space and kitchen facilities. However, these are mainly intended for the volunteer fire fighter who are housed out of these facilities. These meeting spaces are not currently available to other City departments or outside groups. Fire stations are open for special tours by community organizations such as girl scouts and boy scouts and during Fire Prevention Week when tours on fire fighting equipment is given. School District There are three Independent School Districts (ISD 191,ISD 196, and ISD 197) that serve Eagan. Each of the districts have community education services departments which provide an extensive variety of programs for all ages. These programs range from physical participation activities (such as aquatics, gymnastics, aerobics, martial arts, and weight training) to artistic endeavors (Like painting, sculpture, basketry, calligraphy, weaving, and photography), educational opportunities (including computer training, accounting, writing, money management, and language) and a host of other social and self -enrichment programs. Each of the school districts also have a variety of recreational facilities, including ballfields, tennis courts, football stadiums, tracks, gyms, pools, and performance facilities that are available to residents of the respective districts. It should be noted, however, that while all of the school district facilities are open to the public, reserved usage must be planned well in advance to coordinate with other school related use of the facilities. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.134 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 MILES BLOOMINGTON 4► 4• 4 4 4• ■ • ■ • ■ 144 • • V ■ • ■ ■ • ■ • ■ ■ RIVER ■ HILLS CINNAMO • • • ■ • ■ ■ • if, SLAT ■ m ACRES ■ � 494 /0 i1 4 4 4, 4 4 4 A m. • ■ !■■■••■•■■■•■■■■ APPLE . VALLEY •�■■••awaa•■■a■■■■■! CARNELIAN HIGHVIEW samara••• COUNTRY HOME MENDOTA HEIGHTS ■•■•■■■■■■■■••■■■■■■■■■■•••••■ • • ca • • ■ r�• • Yankee Doodle Rd cis` WESCOTT COMMONS LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK c*.] 1 \ - ra■•:■•-i••••■•■•oa■ ROSE7U OUNT ie. ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0/) ■ i.,_ • I ■ LLJ ■ ■ • ■ j ■a ■ • ■ j■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■I -a• I• 3 INVENTORY FIGURE 3-58 ADDITIONAL RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES: PUBLIC INDOOR, PRIVATE INDOOR/OUTDOOR, NON-PROFIT INDOOR/OUTDOOR LEGEND 6 E>3 t 0 PARK SHELTERS I. Bridle Ridge Park 2. Goat Hill Park 3. Rahn Park 4. Quarry Park 5. Sky Hill Park 6. Trapp Farm Park OTHER PUBLIC BUILDINGS 7. Fire Administration Building 8. Fire Station #4 9. Fire Station #5 10. County Library 11. Oak Woods Senior Center 12. Camp Sacajawea SCHOOLS Elementary School Middle School High School (See Figure 3-56 for list of school names) CHURCHES PRIVATE SCHOOLS 13. Trinity Lone Oak School 14. Living Word Academy 15. Tessaract School 16. Rasmussen Business College O BUSINESSES 17. Blue Cross Blue Shield 18. Unisys NON-PROFIT 19. Dakota Civic Theater 20. Caponi Art Park 21. Camp Butwin 22. West End Rod and Gun Club 23. YMCA 24. Turner's Gymnastic School NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COUNTY OR STATE PARK PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 3 - 147 • • • 3 INVENTORY COMMERCIAL RECREATION Included in this section is a description of commercial recreation suppliers including golf courses, health and fitness clubs, indoor recreation suppliers, and outdoor recreation suppliers. Golf Courses There are three golf courses located within Eagan. Two of these (Carriage Hills and Parkview) are privately owned, 18-hole courses open to the public. The remaining course, Lost Spur Country Club, is a privately owned, 9-hole course, with a limited membership base. Carriage Hills Carriage Hills is located in central Eagan„ off of Yankee Doodle Road between Lexington Avenue and Elrene Road. This 18-hole public course offers men's and women's leagues throughout the season. The 1993 greens fees ranged from $15 to $17 depending on the day played. There are no group facilities or picnic areas associated with this golf course. Lost Spur County Club The Lost Spur is a private membership, 9-hole course located in northern Eagan, off of Highway 13. Annual memberships are $900 for a single, $1,100 for two, and $1,350 for a family. In addition to the course, there are three banquet facilities available, capable of seating 20-200 people. The banquet facilities are available to the general public, at fees ranging from complimentary to $250, depending on the organization and the amount of catering ordered through the club. The client breakdown of the membership is about 50% seniors, and 50% adult/family. Lost Spur is currently pushing to improve its family base, and to this end, offers lessons by a golf pro to its adult members, and a junior golf program open to all youths for $40-50. The Country Club feels it has strong community ties, dating back to 1955 when it first opened, and would be very interested in working on joint programming opportunities with the City. Parkview Goff Course Parkview is located in southern Eagan, off of Cliff Road between Pilot Knob Road and Lexington Avenue. This 18-hole course is open to the public, although memberships are available. In addition to the course, Parkview offers a picnic area with a barbecue facility for large group use. This is included with the greens fees for groups of up to 48 people. Parkview also offers BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.148 3 INVENTORY men's, womens, couples, seniors and juniors leagues. The current (1993) client base consists of 70% men and 30% women. This is further broken down by age categories of 35% seniors, 10% juniors and 55% adults. Greens and membership fees vary, depending on age categories and time of play. Annual memberships range from $350 for juniors to $750 for a family membership. Daily greens fees range from $11 for seniors to $14. Parkview would be interested in exploring possible joint ventures with the City, particularly in 1994, as they are planning a season long community celebration in conjunction with their 25th anniversary in business. Other Goff Courses While the three courses discussed are physically located within Eagan's City limits, they are by no means the only golfing opportunities available to Eagan residents. There are 11 additional courses within three miles of Eagan's corporate boundary. They are: Course Apple Valley Golf Course Brockway Golf Club Birnamwood Public Golf Course Dwan Golf Club Hyland Green Golf Club Inverwood Golf Course Mendakota Country Club Orchard Gardens Golf Course Rich Acres Golf Course Southview Country Club Valleywood Golf Course Municipal/ Public/ Commercial Private Municipal Commercial Municipal Municipal Commercial Municipal Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Municipal Public Public Public Public Public Public Private Public Public Private Public Location Holes Apple Valley Rosemount Burnsville Bloomington Bloomington Inver Grove Mendota Heights Burnsville Richfield West St. Paul Apple Valley TOTAL = 9 9 9 8 18 18 18 9 18 & 9 18 18_ 162 When combined with the three courses in Eagan, there are a total of 14 courses and 216 holes within 15 minutes of driving time. Health and Fitness Clubs Eagan Athletic Club The Eagan Athletic Club, located on Pilot Knob Road north of Yankee Doodle Road, offers four racquetball courts, four indoor tennis courts, an indoor and outdoor pool, sauna, whirlpool, • • • SARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 3•150 • • • 3 INVENTORY cardiovascular equipment, free weights, aerobics room, two tanning beds and a child care facility. The Eagan Athletic Club first opened in 1973 and underwent a management change in 1988. Fees range from $21 for a single corporate membership to $55 for a non -corporate family membership. Non-members may use the Eagan Athletic Club for a $10 per day guest fee. Large groups may rent the entire club during off -hours at the rate of $150 non-refundable deposit and $50 per hour. Program offerings for members include: aerobics, volleyball leagues, learn to swim lessons, line dancing, personal training and weight loss. Clientele groups range from families with young children to senior citizens. The Eagan Athletic Club has expressed an interest in collaborating with the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department on joint marketing and use of club facilities by the general public. For example, the development of introductory racquetball lessons through sponsorship of the Parks and Recreation Department may be one such opportunity. Bally's U.S. Swim and Fitness Bally's U.S. Swim & Fitness is located in the Cedarvale Mall and first opened for business in October, 1983. It's facilities (which are all indoor) include a swimming pool, running track, tread mills, stairmasters, bikes, rowing machines and free weights. Fees range from $20 month for a single membership to $55 per month for a family membership. Daily use passes may also be obtained by non-members at a cost of $10. Fitness and training instruction offered to members includes: fitness evaluation and training sessions, body fat testing, and aerobics classes. Clientele range from teens to senior citizens (80 years and older). Family members younger than 14 years are not permitted to use the facility. However, day care facilities are provided for family members at a nominal fee. Historically, Bally's has not opened its doors to outside group or reserved use. They have expressed an interest, though, in examining joint marketing or programming with the City of Eagan. Introductory swim or aerobics classes are two such possibilities. Lifetime Fitness This new family -oriented fitness center, located near the intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road, opened in early September 1994. The center includes 65,000 square feet BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3- 169 3 INVENTORY of multi -use health equipment and facilities, including two basketball courts, four racquetball courts, volleyball, indoor swimming pool, and a large exercise equipment room. Other amenities include a sauna, steam rooms, whirlpools, big screen entertainment system, and free child care and kids programs. Others in Region Within the communities directly surrounding Eagan, there are 11 additional health and fitness clubs. The majority of these are located in the Cities of Bloomington, Burnsville, Apple Valley and West St. Paul. Specific names and locations by community are as follows: Bloomington Bally's U.S. Swim and Fitness Northland Fitness Centers, Inc. Normandale Racquet, Swim and Health Club 98th Street Racquet, Swim and Health Club Peak Adventure Indoor Rock Climbing Youth Pro Sports Training Center Burnsville Burnsville Racquet, Swim and Health Club Apple Valley Better Body Gym Redwood Community Center and Pool (public) West St. Paul Smith Brothers Fitness Center Southview Athletic Club It is likely that as the communities of Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, and Apple Valley see continued growth, that additional private health and fitness clubs will be built to meet the needs of these communities. Future Health Club -Safari at Eagan Second Addition: On November 16, 1993, the Eagan City Council approved a PD amendment and preliminary plat for the Safari at Eagan Second Addition. This development, encompassing approximately 14.7 acres will be located along the north side of Thomas Lake Center Drive and west of Thomas Lake Drive. This future development will include a movie theater, restaurant, and health and fitness club. Included in the Council's approval is the development of a 65,000 square foot health club. This health club will be similar to other health and fitness clubs in the area in its scope of facilities and programs. It is anticipated that the new health club will be open to the public by fall 1994. • BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-15R • • • 3 INVENTORY Indoor Recreation Suppliers Cedarvale Lanes The Cedarvale Lanes located near the Cedarvale Mall features thirty-two bowling lanes for leagues, reserved group use, and general public use. Cedarvale Lanes also houses a full -service restaurant and lounge (Fitz's) and a large banquet room. The banquet room can seat 120 people and is available on a $25 per event basis when food is served by the restaurant. A pro bowler is available for personal instruction at $15 per hour. The Eagan Parks and Recreation Department has used the Cedarvale Lanes for field trips for Summer in the Park Programs. In 1993, all 32 lanes were used with 201 kids parti- cipating in the event. Other joint programming opportunities could be developed and expanded with the City in the future. Grand Slam Grand Slam considers itself an "all indoor family entertainment center". Located in the Cedarvale Mall, Grand Slam has been in operation since 1988. Facilities include batting cages, mini golf, arcades, train ride, go carts, bumper cars, a synthetic hockey rink (36' x 80'), adventure play land, two sand volleyball courts and two slam dunk basketball courts. Fees are charged on a per facility use basis. Reduced package fees are available for larger groups or birthday parties. Principal clientele range for young children (i.e., birthday parties) to adults who use the batting cage and sand volleyball courts. Recreational program offerings are limited mostly to clinics. Grand Slam is currently conducting a basketball clinic for people of all ages which emphasizes shooting and game tactics. The owner at Grand Slam has an interest in developing a stronger partnership with the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department in the joint use and marketing of recreation program offerings. These could include such things as indoor sand volleyball leagues, batting clinics, or other innovative programs such as weekly socialization/recreation opportunities for youth -at -risk. The Dive Shop/Swim School The Dive Shop, located on Yankee Doodle and Coachman Roads provides a full line of scuba equipment along with a 25' x 50' indoor pool. The Dive Shop offers private scuba lessons leading to certification at a cost of $250 - $350. In addition to scuba lessons, the Dive Shop also features Peter Schrock's BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-153 3 INVENTORY Swimming School which offers private and semi -private instruction for beginning to competitive level swimmers, as well as the developmentally disabled. Clientele include pre- schoolers through senior citizens. The Dive Shop and Swim School have been in business since 1990. They have indicated an interest in pursuing joint programming with the Parks and Recreation Department. Romp 8 Roll Romp and Roll is an indoor playground facility, located in the Cliff Lake shopping center, near the intersection of Cliff Road and Interstate 35E in southwest Eagan. Romp and Roll has two play areas, one for toddlers to 3 years, and the larger area for children ages 3-12. The business will be celebrating their first year anniversary on February 10, 1994. Most of the activities are open play, however, reservations are accepted for parties, with add -on features available to enhance the party for additional fees. Romp and Roll also offers a "Drop and Shop" program, where children can be dropped off as long as the parent/guardian is shopping in the Cliff Lake shopping center. Fees for unlimited play time range are $3.95 for Monday through Thursday and $4.95 for Friday through Sunday and school holidays. Birthday parties start at $6.95 per person. There are also group rates available, depending on the size of the group and day of the week. Romp and Roll has indicated that they would be interested in exploring joint programming with the City. Splat Ball Splat Ball is a competitive "war game" in which combatants "shoot" each other with balls of paint that burst on impact, readily identifying "hits" on opponents. Splat Ball is located in a converted grocery store, near the intersection of Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 in west Eagan. There are two separate 8,500 square foot playing fields, complete with mock buildings and artificial landscaping that serve as "battlegrounds" for participants. The business was opened in October of 1993, and plans on continually updating and changing the playing field to offer variety to participants. By ordinance, a minimum age of 16 years is required, and a waiver must be signed. nth parental supervision and participation, 14- and 15-year olds may also participate). The business is open from 10 to 10 each day, though reservations are required. Open play time is on Saturdays and Sundays, from 12:00 - 6:00 p.m. and group reservations are not required. Private parties of 12 or more can • • ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SAGAN, MN 3-154 • • • 3 INVENTORY make reservations to play anytime, 24 hours a day. The cost is $15.00 per person with an additional $10.00 or $5.00 for the paint "gun". Paint balls cost $.06 each, and are available in packs of either 100 or 250. There are no group discounts available. Splat Ball has not done joint programming opportunities with the city, although there may be some opportunity in the future. Brianno's Reception Hall/Catering Service Brianno's is a combined Italian deli and banquet facility located off of Cliff Road, near the Burnsville/Eagan city limits. It is a new business, having opened in August of 1993. The deli is open to the public, and the banquet facility is available for reservations of up to 500 people. The fee for the banquet hall varies, depending upon the size of the group, and how much of the catering is done through their deli. The banquet hall could be also be used as a meeting facility. Currently, they do not offer any organized programs, and are not considering doing so at this point. Monique School of Dance The Monique School of Dance is located on the west end of Yankee Square shopping mall on Yankee Doodle and Federal Drive. This dance studio has been open for eight years in Eagan and 22 years in Apple Valley. Program offerings include ballet, tap and jazz; clients range from children from three years through adults. The Monique School of Dance routinely offers free perfor- mances for community organizations including nursing homes, hospitals and community events like the Fire Musters in Burnsville. Their dance line has performed at local theaters including the Dakota Civic Theater. This school of dance is interested in becoming more active in the community through offerings coordinated by the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. One such possibility is a dance line or ballet performance as part of the summer in the evening park series. Opportunities may also exist to develop introductory lessons in tap, ballet or jazz as a part of, or in addition to, the "Summer in the Park" recreation series. Dyan's World of Dance Dyan's World of Dance is located in the Cedarvale Highlands Shopping Mall. Similar to Monique's it offers a full range of ballet, tap and jazz lessons. Clientele ranges from young children to adults. unique program offerings are also made available to the public such as a "Boys Streetdance" lesson BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK LYSTEM PLAN I EAG AN. MN 9•166 3 INVENTORY program held in the fall of 1993. Dyan's is open to joint program opportunities with the city. Mann Theater A new first -run Mann Theater, located near the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Town Centre Drive, opened in late fall of 1994. The 25,000 square foot theater includes eight screens, lobby with concession, and parking for 550 vehicles. Future plans call for the opening of a new Red Robin family restaurant directly adjacent to the theater, providing a well- rounded evening of family entertainment. Sidewalk trails in and around the theater/restaurant site will provide easy pedestrian access to nearby residents. Other Outdoor Recreation Suppliers Diamond T" Ranch The Diamond "T" Ranch is located in southern Eagan, off of Pilot Knob Road. It offers a variety of activities, centered around bridlery. There is trail riding, hay rides, sleigh rides and western riding lessons, both private and small group. In addition to horses, Diamond "T" also offers a rental hall facility for groups, and rents cross country skis during the winter for use in the Dakota County Parks Lebanon Hills Regional Park, which is located adjacent to the Diamond "T" Ranch. Fees for the various programs vary, with the hall rental of $100 an hour (4 hour minimum) being highest. Private western riding lessons are $25, small (2-4) group lessons are $20 per hour, trail riding is $12 an hour, and hay/sleigh rides are $5 a person. While Diamond "T" Ranch is open to all groups and ages, the majority of their clientele is family and young adults. The representative for Diamond "T" Ranch expressed a strong interest in conducting joint programming with the City. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 2-166 3 INVENTORY FIGURE 3-59 ADDITIONAL RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMERCIAL LEGEND e(F. 1721 GOLF COURSES Within Eagan Carriage Hills 2. Lost Spur Country Club 3. Parkview In Surrounding Communities 4. Apple Valley 5. Brockway 6. Birnamwood 7. Dwan 8. Hyland Green 9. Inverwood 10. Mendakota 11. Orchard Gardens 12. Rich Acres 13. Southview Country Club 14. Valleywood HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUBS Within Eagan 15. Eagan Athletic Club 16. Bally's U.S. Swim and Fitness In Surrounding Communities 17. Bally's U.S. Swim and Fitness 18. Northland Fitness Center 19. Normandale Racquet, Swim and Health Club (off map) 20. 98TH Street Raquet, Swim and Health Club 21. Peak Adventure Indoor Rock Climbing 22. Youth Pro Sports Training Center 23. Burnsville Racquet, Swim and Health Club 24. Better Body Gym 25. Redwood Community Center and Pool 26. Smith Brothers Fitness Center 27. Southview Athletic Club 28. Health Club -Safari INDOOR RECREATION Within Eagan 29. Cedarvale Lanes 30. Grand Slam 31. The Dive Shop/Swim School 32. Romp and Roll 33. Splat Ball 34. Brianno's Reception Hall/Catering Service 35. Monique School of Dance Dyan's World Of Dance OTHER +36. 37. Diamond "T" Ranch PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 3 - 157 • • • 3 INVENTORY 1.S.D. 191 This school district covers portions of Burnsville, Eagan and Savage. It includes most of the western edge of Eagan where it borders Burnsville. The Community Education Program of ISD 191 is extensive, offering over 490 classes in adult services, youth, preschool, and early childhood family education in its fall 1993 catalog. Fees vary depending on the course offering and the age of the participant. The one unique service that ISD 191 offers is telephone registration for their programs through "The Connection" using credit cards. They feel this greatly enhances their accessibility, as registrations can be taken at anytime. Specific facilities that are located in Eagan are as follows: Metcalf Junior High (Diffley & Highway 13) Indoor Outdoor 1 full-size gym 9 ballfields 2 small gyms 5 tennis courts 1 weight room 1 football field 1 pool 1 auditorium Rahn Elementary (4424 Sandstone) Indoor Outdoor 1 small gym 2 ballfields Cedar School (Diffley and Nicols) Indoor Outdoor 1 full-size gym 9 ballfields 1.S.D. 196 This is the largest school district that serves Eagan and also covers Rosemount and Apple Valley. ISD 196 also has a wide range of community education classes. Here again, the fees may vary depending on the particular course chosen. It should be noted that the variety of classes are constantly changing, as they draw on the general public to serve as instructors in these community education classes. Types of classes offered include physical activities, art, entertainment, educational, business training, seniors programs, pre-school, and early childhood family education. There are more facilities located in Eagan at the various sites listed. BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3- 136 3 INVENTORY Eagan High School Indoor Outdoor 2 gyms 5 baseball fields 1 auxiliary gym 2 softball fields 1 weight room 1 stadium/track 1 pool 2 practice football fields 1 auditorium Middle School Indoor Outdoor 2 gyms 4 baseball fields 1 footbalUtrack field Elementary Schools (each of the six schools offers the following) Indoor Outdoor 1 gym 2 ballfields 1 hardcourt area I.S.D. 197 This school district serves the smallest number of Eagan residents and has only a single elementary school, Pilot Knob, located in Eagan. The district serves the northern part of Eagan. However, much of the area covered by the district is zoned commercial/industrial. ISD 197 also has a community education program, offering a similar selection of classes as the other school districts in Eagan (aquatics, youth enrichment, adult enrichment, senior adults, etc.). Other County Library The County Library, located on Westcott Road, offers a variety of meeting spaces and programs for the general public. Meeting rooms include a mezzanine conference room with seating for 12, a main level conference room with seating for eight, and a lower level large group meeting space with a capacity for 150 adults to 200 children. A small kitchen facility is also attached to the lower meeting space. All of these rooms are available free of charge to local community organizations on a reserved basis. Frequent users of the library include the Eagan Hockey Association, Boy Scots, and neighborhood associations. A variety of children's programs focused on literacy, reading skills and creative expression are also offered by the county library. For example, fall 1993 programs include storytelling, puppet shows, movies, and Christmas stories. From January through May, the library has a weekly program, known as the "Read to Me" Club, which is orientated to pre-school children. • SART ON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-130 • • • 3 INVENTORY Currently, 300-400 children participate each spring. During the summer months, the library offers a reading club for children of all ages. Activities include reading, clowns, magicians, puppet shows, movies, and crafts. More than 800 children participated in the 1993 program. Dozens of other programs are offered to children throughout the year, such as the music and movement program for 2 - 8 year olds. In addition, the library offers learning opportunities for adults, such as its adult literacy program that provides one on one tutoring to persons with linguistic barriers. The emphasis of the library on children's programming may present opportunities for the City to strengthen and expand its recreation opportunities for kids through a joint partnership with library programming staff. Oak Woods Senior Housing The Dakota County HRA maintains jurisdiction over the Community Room in the Oak Woods facility. As such, this Eagan facility is available for use under the overall HRA guidelines. These guidelines establish the following priorities for Community Room use: First priority - HRA employees conducting HRA business. Second priority - Individuals or groups volunteering or responding to invitations to provide educational and/or entertainment to tenants. Third priority - Senior tenants - (requires $100 damage deposit) Fourth priority - Compatible groups, i.e. outside groups that assist HRA (requires $100 kitchen damage deposit) Fifth priority - Other groups or individuals - (requires $500 damage deposit and a $150 rental fee) The Eagan Parks and Recreation Department has access to the Community Room on a no fee/no damage deposit basis providing that the programs are geared towards senior citizens. Any other "free standing" programs would require a $500 damage deposit and $150 rental fee by the City. Facilities in the Community Room include tables and seating for 100 people, along with a full -service kitchen. Camp Sacajawea-Lebanon Hills Regional Park Camp Sacajewea is a County -owned facility within Lebanon Hills Regional Park, located just across the Eagan line in Apple Valley. The camp features a large lodge building suitable for day meetings or overnight use. The lodge can easily accommodate up to 60 people for meetings and 40 for overnight camping. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.137 3 INVENTORY The lodge is generally rented for youth oriented events, such as church groups, boy scouts, girl scouts and community youth recreation. Rental fees are $15 per day and $35 per night plus a $25 refundable damage deposit. The rental fee also includes use of the kitchen and restrooms with showers, which are part of the main lodge building. Promotion of Camp Sacajewea, through the City's newsletters and other printed medium, or its use as an auxiliary day camp facility for Summer in the Parks programs are future possibilities under joint collaboration with the County. PRIVATE INDOOR/OUTDOOR Included in this section is a review of recreation facilities and services provided by local churches, private and parochial schools, businesses, and non-profit organizations. Churches Background In 1993, there were a total of 33 churches, representing a wide range of denominations, in the City of Eagan. Most of these have permanent facilities, while several others were in the process of acquiring property and building their own structures, As a part of the recreation analysis portion of the Park Systems Plan, a telephone survey of eight churches was conducted in December, 1993. These churches represent a cross-section of the religious institutions in the City and provide a good understanding of the types of "recreation" facilities and services which they offer to the community at large. In general, most of the churches believe that their role in the community will continue to change in the future. Historically, the churches have tended to focus their principal activities on parishioners and internal programs/service offerings. And while that continues to be true today, most have broadened their role identification within the community and are now offering a wider range of social outreach services and facilities to non - parishioners as well. This paradigm shift may present an opportunity for the City to enhance service delivery to the community through the networking of non -religious programs and facilities, and marketing city offerings through local churches. Some of these opportunity areas are outlined in the following sections. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3.13U • • • 3 INVENTORY Meeting Space Most churches have meeting space and classrooms which are available to community organizations and groups. For example, All Saints Lutheran Church offers a fellowship hall which seats 100 people and several smaller classrooms. There is no charge for use by non-profit groups; but donations are accepted from for -profit organizations. Christ Lutheran Church has a fellowship hall capable of seating up to 300 people at tables which includes a kitchen facility. There is no fee for use by "public" groups. Mary Mother of the Church (located just across the Eagan line in Burnsville) has a 150-seat assembly room available for $50 an hour and several smaller classrooms available for $7 per hour. Most of the other churches that were contacted have similar space availability and policies allowing use by outside groups in the community. In addition to meeting space, Trinity Lone Oak Church offers a gymnasium which is available for rental to community groups at the rate of $100 for the first hour and $50 for each hour after. Outdoor Spaces The availability of outdoor church spaces for recreation purposes is far more limited than indoor meeting spaces. However, some opportunities do exist for public use of open spaces on church grounds. For example, Christ Lutheran Church has a large open turf area located on the west side of their church building. This area is used for women's and men's church kittenball and a full- size softball field is planned for construction next year east of the church. The church has indicated a willingness to make available their open space area for soccer fields, if the city has such an interest. All Saints Lutheran Church has a basketball hoop and hardcourt area which is used by neighborhood residents. Mary Mother of the Church currently leases its ballfield area to the Burnsville Athletic Commission. Through a cooperative arrangement, the Burnsville Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for mowing and fertilization of this area for community use. As part of its new facility development on Highway 3, St. Thomas Beckett Catholic Church will be constructing a children's play area, internal pathways and a riparian access on Hay Lake. These facilities will be available for use by residents living in the immediate area. Trinity Lone Oak Church has both a playground facility and small ballfield which also is used by residents from the area as well as a church team which plays in the city's softball leagues. Community Programs The churches in the Eagan community are playing a much more active role in providing community support services and pro- grams than just a few years ago. Some churches, such as Mt. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 3-139 3 INVENTORY Calvary Lutheran and Eagan Alliance have introduced daycare facilities. Most of the churches surveyed have developed partnerships with community action organizations to promote social awareness, networking, and classroom workshops in a number of different areas. These include: mental health groups, A "Stop SIDS Group", Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, Weight Loss Groups, Red Cross First Aid training, and Defensive Driving. Meeting rooms are also frequently used by local Boy Scout Troops, fitness classes, jazzercize and neighborhood associations. All Saints Lutheran Church has created a "Mom's" Club which is a support group for "stay at home" moms that offers weekly meetings and craft activities for young children. Joint Programming Most of the churches indicated a strong desire to work more closely with the City in cooperating in the delivery of social/ recreation programs that are of a non -religious nature. The quarterly City newsletter may present a forum for listing these community services along with the appropriate contacts and telephone numbers. Similarly, all of the churches said they would be willing to work with the City in the promotion of community -wide environmental awareness and education initiatives such as recycling, composting, tree planting and care, and water quality management. Most of the churches have adult learning groups appropriate for city presentations and would also be willing to disseminate literature and information to parishioners via weekly bulletins and city brochures. This may be another viable marketing niche for the city in promoting environmental stewardship in the community. Private/Parochial Schools Trinity Lone Oak School The Trinity Lone Oak School is located in conjunction with Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran Church. The school's recreational facilities include an indoor gymnasium, ballfield, and playground. The gymnasium may be reserved by outside groups. A ballfield and playground are open to the community and see a small amount of usage from area neighborhoods. Social and recreational programs offered to the general public include meal functions, annual bazaar and silent auction. In addition, the school's parent/teachers organization has, for several years, hosted a large volleyball tournament drawing adult volleyball teams from throughout the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. Sixty-four teams are involved in this all -day event which is held on a Saturday in February at the Eagan High School. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAOAN, MN 3.140 • • • 3 INVENTORY The school would like to become more actively involved in environmental education programs offered in local schools including the City's Arbor Day, Recycling and Water Quality presentations. Living Word Academy The Living Word Academy School, located on Nicols Road, has a very small enrollment with just 16 students in K-6. The school has no indoor or outdoor recreation facilities and offers no social or recreational programs for the public. The small class size and lack of facilities restricts future opportunities for partnerships with the City. Tesseract School The Tesserat School is a private preschool through 6th Grade educational institution located on Silver Bell Road north of Highway 13. The school has a current enrolment of 271 students. Outdoor recreation facilities include a playground area for the students. This playground area is fenced in, however, and is not open for use by residents in the area. The school does have a small indoor gymnasium space but does not currently rent this facility to the public; activities are focused exclusively on the students. Additionally, the school does not offer any outreach social or recreation programs for the community. The school may have an interest, though, in working with the City on environmental education programs. Rasmussen Business College The Rasmussen Business College has no indoor or outdoor recreational facilities. It does, however, have a classroom style conference room which seats up to 20 people. This room is available for local organizations on a fee basis. Currently, the local Toastmasters organization meets in the Rasmussen conference room on a monthly basis. Generally speaking, Rasmussen does not offer any enrichment programs for the community. Its principal focus is on the training and education of its student body. Businesses Blue Cross/Blue Shield Through a long standing agreement with Blue Cross/Blue Shield, the City can utilize open space for athletic fields at the corporate headquarters located at Yankee Doodle and Blue Cross Roads. Under this agreement, the City is responsible for the field scheduling and field maintenance activities which include BAATON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PAfK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 3.141 3 INVENTORY fertilization, aerification, line striping and the placement and maintenance of soccer goals. Over the years, the availability and type of space available for City use has changed. From 1977 through 1987, the City utilized two ballfields for department adult softball and two full- sized soccer fields for youth and adult soccer fields. In 1990, the full-sized soccer fields were converted to four mini soccer fields. In 1993, six mini soccer fields were created at the site. In addition to these activities, Dakota, Inc. also holds their annual fund raising event called Dakota Fun Fest on the soccer field area. The Parks and Recreation Department offers a variety of support services for this event. In addition to this relationship, Blue Cross/Blue Shield was also instrumental in providing matching funding for the construction of the shelter building at Sky Hill Park. This facility which includes locker rooms and showers is available to Blue Cross/Blue Shield employees who utilize parks and trails facilities for fitness activities. Unisys Unisys Corporation has a series of four softball fields located on their campus just north of Yankee Doodle Road. From 1977 through 1985, City adult softball fields utilized the four ballfields in exchange for Unisys' use of Northview athletic fields and broomball at a City hockey rink in the winter. Unisys and the City split the maintenance responsibilities under that arrangement. In 1989, the City was approached by Unisys to perform all maintenance on the four ballfields including fertilization, herbicide application, aerating, mowing, infield dragging and maintaining foul lines. In exchange, a three-year agreement was signed which allowed youth softball and baseball to use the site on three evenings each week and on Saturdays. This agreement has been renewed on an annual basis, however, further renewal of the agreement is tenuous since the property is currently on the market for sale. There are no rental fees to the City or the Eagan Athletic Association for current use of this facility. Unisys has disbanded its recreational services program and, consequently, no longer uses the site for the corporate softball teams. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3-14E • • • 3 INVENTORY Non -Profit Organizations Dakota Civic Theater Dakota Civic Theater is a non-profit organization that was organized in 1992. It offers recreational opportunities through both active participation in the actual theater productions, and through attendance at their seven annual shows. The theater offers a full range of productions, including drama, comedy, dance and musicals. Besides actual acting on stage, there are educational opportunities in community theater production, backstage work on props, costumes and design, and work in marketing and public relations - all of which is accomplished by community volunteers. For those who are more inclined to viewing productions instead of actively participating in them, adult tickets are $8 each, with musicals costing $10. These prices are reduced to $5 and $6 for students and seniors. The clients served by the theater varies from youth to seniors, depending upon the type of production. Dakota Civic Theater is very interested in joint programming with the City, and would like to develop a program that they could present in the parks. Caponi Art Park Since the late 1980's, the City of Eagan has been working closely with Mr. Anthony Caponi, a local educator/artist and long- time resident, on the concept of developing a public outdoor sculpture garden on a 60 acre tract where Mr. Caponi currently resides. This parcel is located between Patrick Eagan Park and Diffley Road and on the south side of Diffley Road adjoining the Lexington/Diffley athletic site. On November 8, 1990, the Eagan City Council unanimously and enthusiastically approved a resolution calling for the City to enter into a formal working partnership with Mr. Caponi to create a public art park. The City agreed to take a leadership role in establishing a non-profit foundation to oversee the acquisition, development and administration of the park in pursuit of Mr. Caponi's aesthetic and educational philosophy. The "Art Park", as it has become known, would offer the natural landscape as a palette on which the professional artist, as well as the uninitiated, could explore sculpture and other forms of art as an inherent outgrowth of the environment. Facilities would be developed to support and enhance the use of the park by educators, students, recreating public and the casual observer. Included in the physical development plan is an indoor art studio, BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.143 3 INVENTORY amphitheater, performing arts center, environmental observation areas, nature paths, and classrooms. Support facilities would include parking Tots, security lighting, directional signage and ornamental landscaping. Access between the northern and southern portions of the park would be facilitated by a pedestrian tunnel underneath Diffley Road, which was installed during its reconstruction in 1993. The Art Park would be linked to Patrick Eagan Community Park and the Lexington/Diffley Park Athletic Site via trial connections combining these park areas into one common outdoor recreation open space. Mr. Caponi has formed a non-profit foundation board to further the planning and development of the Art Park and the City is continuing to support this project through administrative, technical, and planning assistance, as it unfolds. Camp Butwin This approximately 80-acre camp is located entirely within Lebanon Hills Regional Park, along Eagan's southern border. It is owned and operated by the St. Paul Jewish Community Center, which runs a private summer day camp from mid -June to mid -August at the camp. The camp is for children in the kindergarten through 6th grade age group. A wide variety of programs are offered in conjunction with the day camp, including water programs (boating, canoeing, swimming) horseback riding, nature studies, theater, arts and crafts, overnight camping and orienteering. The camp also has a swimming pool on site. Enrollment in the day camp is limited to members of the St. Paul Jewish Community Center (J.C.C.), however, membership in the J.C.C. is open to all. Membership fees vary greatly, depending on the level of membership and what classification (family, single parent, etc.) an individual falls into. In addition to the day camp program, the 80 acre site is available for rental and group reservation. The fees for these reservations are independently assessed, based on group size, facilities used and support staff needed. Here again, specific inquiries should be made through the St. Paul J.C.C. While Camp Butwin is a heavily used program from mid -June to mid -August, the St. Paul J.C.C. expressed a tentative interest in pursuing joint programming possibilities with the City. West End Rod and Gun Club The West End Gun Club is located in the southeast corner of Eagan, along the west border of Inver Grove Heights. It is primarily a trap and skeet shooting range that offers members an opportunity to participate in these activities. Most of the shooting is seasonal in nature and coincides with the fall hunting openers. With the continued development of this area, it is questionable • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAOAN, MN 3•144 • • • 3 INVENTORY as to how long this range will continue operation, and it should be not be counted on as a long term recreational opportunity. YMCA The YMCA of Greater St. Paul is currently beginning construc- tion of a new YMCA facility in Eagan, located on the east side of Highway 149 across from West Publishing Company. At the conclusion of the fund raising process, the building will include a gymnasium, lap pool, zero depth warm water pool, suspended running track, exercise room, equipment room with cardio- vascular and strength training equipment, and child care facility for infants, toddlers and pre-school (open to non-members of the community). The construction of playing fields for soccer and baseball use is also being planned, but the exact number and layout has not yet been determined. Monthly fees will range from $19.50 for teen/college students to $55.50 for families. The Eagan YMCA has begun, and is planning to expand, the number and types of program offerings to the community at large. A day camp held in 1993 at Mueller Farm Park brought in more than 400 youth during a ten -week period. The Eagan YMCA is currently offering a child care program through the local elementary schools for before and after school care. A program for disabled/non-disabled integration through the Dakota Hills Middle is also being developed. In the future, the Eagan YMCA plans to offer learn to swim classes for non-members and a community youth sports program geared for 5 to 11 year old children, in an introductory and non-competitive sports environment. In addition, local community groups will have access to the indoor pools and gymnasium through an hourly rental system. The YMCA has expressed a willingness to collaborate with the City of Eagan in the area of joint programming, marketing and the sharing of facilities to complement recreational program offerings by each organization. This may present an opportunity to refine the recreational service objectives of the City and the YMCA, in order to enhance existing program offerings and to avoid duplication of services to the public. Tumer's Gymnastic School The Turner's Gymnastic School is a private non-profit foundation established to advance interest and instruction in youth gymnastics. Because the school is located just across the Eagan border, in Mendota Heights, it has been included in this portion of the Recreation Facility Inventory. The Turner's Gymnastic School is the largest and newest youth gymnastics facility in the Twin Cities. The school currently has BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3- 145 3 INVENTORY 530 participants including a large number from the Eagan community. Facilities include over 9,000 square feet of gymnastics space featuring the latest gymnastics equipment. The facility also includes an aerobics room on the second level, and the school will soon begin an adult aerobics and dance program. At full capacity, the school will have room for up to 1,000 students in enrolled programs. Currently, the school offers "straight" gymnastics training for pre- schoolers, beginners, intermediate and team competition levels. Fees range from $25 for pre-schoolers to $100 for competitive level gymnist for a ten -week session. Twice per week open workout periods are also provided for adults who have prior gymnastic training. The cost is $115 per year. In addition to gymnastics, Turners also holds tae-kwon-do classes for youth and adults. Facility management indicates a strong interest in cooperating with the City of Eagan on joint programming and use of the facility. In particular, the school would like to increase instruction during the summer months and before 4:00 P.M. during the school year. This may open up new programming opportunities through current Tiny Tots "Summer in the Park" or new City program offerings. • • • BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.146 • • • 3 INVENTORY HISTORIC SITES Historical resources open to the public are very limited in the Eagan area. This section examines four that are in close proximity to the community. City Owned Old Town Hall The Eagan township hall, completed on June 16, 1914, is located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road across from the existing municipal center. This building served as a meeting hall and polling place for the township through the early 1950's. In 1989, the City received a community revitalization grant from the State of Minnesota to upgrade the interior and exterior of the building. This grant was matched by a donation of sweat equity and financing from the Eagan Rotary Club. Under the grant, a new entrance and landscaping was added to the exterior of the building, a new roof was installed, and the interior was upgraded with a new floor. The town hall has seen little use, however, since its upgrading was completed in 1990. The City History Committee has expressed a strong desire in increasing the use of the Old Town Hall for community meetings, environmental education programs and use by local community groups. The Parks and Recreation Department could be a natural in finding appropriate uses for this historic building. Other Historic Fort Snelling Fort Snelling is a re-created frontier fort of the early 1800's era. It is located on the bluffs of the Mississippi River, near its confluence with the Minnesota River. The actual fort area consists of an approximately two acre site, and includes 10 free standing buildings, 4 separate towers, and some additional shops and support buildings in the auxiliary area of the fort. Due primarily to budget constraints, the fort is typically only open from May 1 to October 31. During this time, staff are in period costumes and most tours are self -guided with interactive opportunities with staff members, although large groups (typically schools) can arrange tours prior to Memorial Day and after Labor Day. There are also a variety of special programs offered on weekends and holidays througout the summer, such as a Civil War weekend, Veteran's weekend, Fur Traiders "Reunion," etc. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.169 3 INVENTORY Fees for admission are $3.00 for adults, $1.00 for ages 6-15, and $10.00 for a family, with no seniors discount available. This fee includes admission to the grounds, tour information, and an orientation film in the History Center which is recommended viewing to orient the visitor with the fort prior to beginning their self -guided tour. Trinity Lone Oak Church The Trinity Lone Oak Church is one of the few remaining structures of historical significance in the City of Eagan. However, the church does not offer public tours or presentations on the historical aspects of this building, per se. Occasionally, historical societies or individuals from outside the community do visit the church to study its history, construction and architectural features. At this time, the church would prefer to keep organized tours to a minimum. Sibley House/Faribault House Historic Site The Sibley House/Faribautt House Historic Site is located on Highway 13 just east of Highway 55 in Mendota Heights. Operated by a private non-profit foundation, this 7.5 acre site includes the original home of the State's first governor, Henry Sibley, and the original homestead of Jean Baptiste Faribault, a fur trader from the 1820's. There are several historic buildings on the grounds and a small gift shop which is operated by the foundation for fund raising purposes. The museum also contains a significant collection of artifacts on Native American culture. The site offers public guided tours between the months of May and October. Rates range from $3 per adults to free admission for children under six. A variety of displays and working demonstrations of the period (1845 -1855) are also available for the public to see. In addition to guided tours, the foundation offers outreach programs to community and special interest groups. These programs include slide shows, talks, craft and material displays, textile samplers, etc. The cost for the outreach programs is $10 per hour plus materials. The staff of the foundation would like to see more usage by local schools and community groups. They would also be interested in forming a partnership with the Parks and Recreation Department in developing summer camp programs recreating life in the 1850's, including cooking, weaving, and other handicrafts. The summer camp could also include tours of other nearby historic sites including historic Fort Snelling. • MARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 3-IGO • • • 3 INVENTORY NATURE CENTERS There are no public or private nature interpretive facilities located in the City of Eagan. This section details five environmental learning facilities which are located within a reasonable driving distance of city residents and local schools. Public Woodlake Nature Center The Woodlake Nature Center is located at the intersection of 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue in Richfield. This center, which is owned and operated by the city of Richfield, contains 160 acres of forested and wetland area. Facilities include 4.5 miles of crushed limestone walking trails, a 750 foot floating boardwalk, docks, observation blinds, a 100 seat outdoor amphitheater, and picnic grounds. The main focus of the center is on a museum building which includes displays, touch and feel room, and auditorium. Programming is geared for pre-schoolers through senior citizens, individuals, families, school groups and community organizations. The center has established a close relationship with the Richfield school district and has developed a graduated science learning program wherein every student has at least three opportunities per year to visit and learn at the nature center. Guided nature hikes and activities for other "non - school" community groups is on an as -available basis at the rate of $1.50 per child. Scout groups and other schools from outside the Richfield School District are frequent users of the Woodlake Nature Center. Richardson Nature Center The Richardson Nature Center, located in the Hyland Lake Regional Park, is owned and operated by the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District. The area most actively used by the Nature Center is about five acres in size; the entire park is slightly Tess than 1,000 acres. Nature Center facilities include two miles of wood chipped and mowed grass trails, an observation blind, outdoor amphitheater, and interpretive center. The center includes two classrooms with capacities of 40 and 20 people respectively. The interpre- tive center also features work rooms and several display areas. The primary emphasis of the interpretive center is public programs during weekends and environmental education programs for school groups during weekdays. As with most nature centers, weekend programs cover a wide range of topics BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 3.161 3 INVENTORY and activities ranging from crafts to lectures, movies, and resource stewardship. School groups come from a large surrounding area including occasional use by the Eagan and Burnsville School Districts. Minimum charges are $18 per group and $1.50 per student. Scout groups and other community youth organizations also take advantage of naturalist led tours at the Richardson Nature Center. Two full-time and two part-time naturalists are available to assist the public. Minnesota Zoological Gardens Encompassing 485 acres, the Minnesota Zoological Gardens lies just south of the City of Eagan in Apple Valley. Outdoor facilities include five walking trails featuring a variety of plants and animals in their natural setting, a monorail, children's zoo, playground and 1,500 seat outdoor amphitheater. Facilities directly connected with the zoological building include three ecosystem reproductions - the Minnesota Trail, Tropics Trail and Sea Life Trail. A small theater with seating for 200, a chil- dren's zoo lab, dolphin tank, coral reef aquarium, gift shop and fast food restaurant are other features of the main zoological building. Admission fees are $6 for adults, $4 for senior citizens, and $2.50 for children between the ages of 3 and 12. The Minnesota Zoo has a full-time education department offering a variety of programs for individuals, families, and organized groups. Several schools from the Eagan community are involved in a graduated environmental education curriculum at the zoo. Self -guided tours are also available to schools or other groups who wish to deploy their own environmental education curriculums. Guided tours of the zoological gardens are offered at a cost of $2 per person plus admission. A variety of opportunities are available to Park and Recreation Departments to develop public programs and children's outings in conjunction with the zoo's education department. Pike Island Interpretive Center- Fort Snelling State Park The Pike island Interpretive Center is located on Pike Island within Fort Snelling State Park. The main interpretive building includes two display exhibit areas and a small lecture style classroom. Outdoor spaces feature a tall grass prairie restoration, Native American garden restoration, and several miles of hiking trails in and around Pike Island. One full-time naturalist, supported by a number of volunteer naturalists and interns conduct a variety of interpretive programs year round in the nature center and throughout the park. Programs focus on the geology, wildlife, vegetation and BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 9.96E • • • 3 INVENTORY water resources of the park. Subjects range form snowshoe hikes to raptor release, and preparing wild edibles. Free programs are available to the public on weekends. During the school year, several area schools take advantage of a graduated program of environmental education offered by the Pike Island Nature Center, on a no fee basis. Special programs can also be developed for outside community groups, boy scouts, and Parks and Recreation Departments. Within the next two years, the State anticipates construction of a new interpretive center to be located on the mainland, at the bottom of the bluff just south of historic Fort Snelling. This new interpretive center will include a comprehensive natural history display area, large indoor theater and gift shop. Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge - Visitors Center The Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge - Visitors Center was first opened to the public in 1989. It is situated on an isolated site of approximately 14 acres overlooking the Minnesota River Valley in Bloomington. This site will eventually be connected with the entire Minnesota River Valley Wildlife Refuge through the acquisition of additional property. The Visitors Center includes a large exhibit area, 125-seat auditorium with multi -graphic capability, two 30-seat classrooms, a hearth room, and a gift shop. The principal emphasis of the exhibit area is on hands-on type displays depicting the various ecosystems within the refuge (from the prairie bluff tops to the marsh flood plain). Outdoor facilities include a 60-seat amphitheater, prairie restoration, and one trail which descends 130 feet from the interpretive center to the river valley. Unlike most nature centers - which focus their educa- tional activities on Kindergarten to 6th Graders - the refuge directs its environmental education programming on 4th through 12th Grade classes. Currently, the Visitors Center has several "partnership schools" involved in a graduated environmental education program. One of these is Apple Valley High School which recently switched from the Minnesota Zoo to the refuge. In addition to the partnership school concept, the refuge also offers orientation and training sessions for teachers who wish to conduct their own curricula using the refuge as an outdoor learning environment. The refuge offers natural history pro- grams to the general public which include special events, guided hikes, and hands on resource management projects. The two full-time naturalists at the refuge are complemented by other volunteer interpreters and guest speakers. There are no fees for use of the refuge, including special programs which are established for school, scouts, park and recreation department activities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN a-983 3 INVENTORY Non -Profit Thomas Irvine Dodge Nature Center The Thomas Irvine Dodge Nature Center, is named for its founder. It was first established in 1969 on 300 acres located in West St. Paul. The center is operated as a public nonprofit foundation. The philosophy of the center is quite simple: to encourage the conservation of natural resources through environmental education. Features of the Dodge Nature Center include a restored prairie, model farm, apiary (bee keeping), several miles of trails, floating boardwalk, and interpretive center. The primary emphasis of the nature center is on environmental education for youngsters. The center has established a close working relationship with many of the area school districts including ISD #196. More than 40,000 students were involved in a graduated program of natural science education last year. Programs are also offered periodically for outside groups such as scouts and 4-H organizations. Special program offerings and services are made available to families with annual memberships which cost $35. ISD #197, through its Community Education Services Department, has also established several seasonal program offerings for families and adults at the Dodge Nature Center. These public program offerings range form apple harvesting to grapevine weaving and snow shoe construction. The Dodge Nature Center has indicated an interest in exploring the development and marketing of environmental education in conjunction with the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN] EAGAN, MN 3.1E4 • • • 4 Standards and Classification 1 CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 4 STANDARDS CHAPTER 4: ACCEPTED STANDARDS AND CLASSIFICATIONS FOR PARK FACILITIES • INTRODUCTION The use of standards and classifications in assessing recreation demand and level of service has both strengths and weak- nesses. On the positive side, standards can provide a ready rule of thumb for judging the overall adequacy of facilities and service. In addition, standards can help to promote an equitable distribution of facilities for the community. On the negative side, standards tend to take the blanket approach and ignore local factors which are unique to the community, thus missing the real issues. The use of standards should not imply uniformity among recreation areas. Rather, it is the variety and individuality of park areas that make them interesting and exciting places to relax, renew and refresh oneself. Recreation is an experience, not just a facility. Standards are intended to stimulate thought, not substitute for it. The primary issue that confronts Eagan policy and decision - makers in applying standards is how the standards relate to community quality and to what extent the standards should be applied. With continuing residential development pressure, Eagan is gradually evolving into a mature suburb with full build - out. Housing values are edging upward as upper income housing becomes more prevalent. Table 4.3, Recommended Facility Standards, summarizes by activity the recommended physical design standards, per capita recommendations, and service radius for a wide variety of rec- reational activities. While these standards can be applied to existing conditions, their real asset is as a planning tool in estab- lishing needs for future planning horizon years. Application of the standards will occur in subsequent analysis sections to reaffirm community trends or as a tool in guiding Eagan decision -makers. Park and open space standards established for Eagan should be regularly reviewed to guide future facility improvements in response to changing demographics and user demand trends. This classification system is based upon national and Metropolitan Council recognized park types with modifications made for local conditions and Eagan's needs. It is a tool to guide decision -makers in determining park location, size, and function. Specific standards and criteria are recommended for BARTON ASCWINAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN! EAGAN, MN 4-1 4 STANDARDS each park class, however, compromises may be required as dictated by local circumstances. Cooperation with other units of government, school districts, and the private sector are key considerations relating to local circumstances. This cooperation and joint use of facilities has implications for the application of standards as the total number of facilities may be increased or decreased. For example, the City of Eagan and the school district cooperate with joint use of select ballfields. Eagan also utilizes private parcels for ballfield use. These facilities and their opportunities or limitations must be taken into consideration when applying the standards. Similar situations are encountered with many of the facilities for which standards exist. • EXISTING PARK CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Eagan's park system is comprised of a variety of facilities that conform to a classification hierarchy according to their use, size, and facility development. Park classifications assist in providing a comprehensive system by responding to the community's needs, its land -use patterns and densities, and the area's physical characteristics. Eagan's park system has been developed according to tradi- tional facility classifications of which neighborhood parks are the fundamental building blocks. Other classifications are intended to meet specific needs, either communitywide or use -specific. The following classifications describe facility types, facilities normally included, and their role in the system. Table 4.1 provides a concise summary. Neighborhood Common Neighborhood commons are intended to service special neighborhoods due to geographic or barrier limitations. However, the neighborhoods have insufficient size (500 to 1,000 residents to fulfill the needs of a complete neighborhood park. Sites usually have less than four acres of usable land and therefore only allow for play equipment, multiuse hardcourts, picnicking, and possibly substandard ball fields (suitable for informal recreation). These areas are highly individual neighborhood facilities based upon the nature of the site and the immediate adjacent population. In general, neighborhood commons should be limited to those residential neighborhoods that cannot be adequately served by a neighborhood park due to physical limitations or access con- straints. Their use may increase as social concerns regarding • BARTON ASC KHAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 4E • • • 4 STANDARDS TABLE 4.1 PARK CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Component Use Service Area Site Size Location Neighborhood Common (public or private) Areas not adequately serviced by neighborhood parks 1/4 mile preferred, maximum 3/8 to 1/2 mile radius Min. 1 ac.; max. 4 ac Neighborhoods not adequately serviced by traditional neighborhood parks due to land use or physical limitations. Neighborhood Park Provide recreation and open space to residential areas 1/2 mile to 3/4 mile service radius with balanced geographic distribution Min. 10 ac.; 15 to 18 ac. desirable Equally distributed within residential areas, centrally located for neighborhood access. Community Athletic Field Provide active athletic facilities to community Communitywide Min. 20 ac.; max. 60 ac. Central with community accessible via collector or minor arterial roadways. Community Park Communitywide use, festivals, events Communitywide Min. 25 ac., 50 to 100 ac. desirable Central locations employing attractive natural and physical features. Linear Park Trails incorporating widened right-of-way (ROW) Communitywide Varies Natural or cultural corridors to accommodate multimodal trail use. Conservancy Area Conserve and manage sensitive natural areas Communitywide Varies Large wetlands, sensitive vegetation, and unique environmental areas. Special Use Park Special facilities, unique built environments, single purpose sites Communitywide Varies by use Golf courses, nature centers, ski areas, etc. Historic Sites Historical or cultural significance Communitywide Varies Community historical sites that merit attention and preservation. Source: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. BARTON ASCMIMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4-3 4 STANDARDS child security become more apparent. For example, a neighbor- hood common may be considered for a small neighborhood which is one -quarter to three -eighths of a mile from other park facilities and perhaps isolated by major streets or highways. Neighborhood commons may tend to pose operation and maintenance problems due to their small size and inefficient time requirements. Eagan could require, in unusual circumstances, that developers own and operate neighborhood commons to serve their projects if the neighborhood is of medium to high density residential and not in close proximity to a neighborhood or community park. Neighborhood commons should not be considered as a solution to all troublesome service areas. Rather, a series of evaluation criteria or questions should be considered in analyzing individual situations. The following questions may serve as evaluation criteria regarding neighborhood common and their service area applications. 1. What are the neighborhood's barrier edges including roadways, rail corridors, or other physical impediments? 2. What park service area currently applies to the neighborhood and what service limitations exist? 3. What parks, open space, or school facilities contribute to the neighborhood? 4. What existing or planned trails access the neighborhood and provide linkage to adjacent parks, open space, or schools? 5. What land use exists or is planned for the area, both type and density? 6. Is multifamily a significant component of the neighborhood, and if so, should private interests provide recreational opportunities for the multifamily residents? 7. What are the neighborhood demographics; singles, young families, single -parent families, or senior citizens? 8. What specific facilities are needed by the neighborhood residents? 9. What are the maintenance implications of a neighborhood common in terms of staff travel times, special facilities, or site access problems? • • • YARTON ASCIdNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' KA6AN, MN 44 • • • 4 STANDARDS 10. Would the proposed site be adequately accessible to the abutting neighborhood and provide site visibility for personal safety? 11. Does the neighborhood require additional or special recreation programming that the common could provide due to underprivileged populations, residential densities, or unusual demographic characteristics? Service Area: Less than one -quarter mile radius preferred; three -eighths to one-half mile radius in select circumstances. Desirable Size in Acres: Minimum size of one acre, maximum size four acres. Primary Function/User Groups: Facilities should respond to specific user groups such as children or senior citizens within residential areas not adequately served by neighborhood parks. Locational Characteristics: Neighborhood commons can be public or privately owned and maintained and should be located primarily within medium- and high -density residential areas whose population is not adequately serviced by neighborhood parks. Neighborhood commons may also be located in single- family residential areas; however, their use should be limited to neighborhoods which cannot be serviced by neighborhood parks due to access, environmental barriers, or unusual neighborhood needs. Typical Facilities: • Open play space. • Seating areas. • Small picnic area. • Totlot or small play structure. • Facilities for seniors such as horseshoe courts or shuffleboard (in senior residential community). • Adequate pedestrian access (no user vehicle access or parking should be provided). • Multiuse/basketball hardcourt. • Ornamental or vegetable gardens, in appropriate situations. Private enterprise should be encouraged to provide recreation facilities for medium- to high -density multifamily land uses. A public/private partnership may be considered in specific instances. Public ownership should be limited to unusual circumstances resulting from varying land uses and isolated service areas. Park design should minimize maintenance through parcel selection, park design, and equipment choice. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 46 4 STANDARDS Neighborhood Park Eagan's neighborhood parks are the fundamental building blocks of the park and open space system. Neighborhood parks are distributed throughout the community's residential areas and are intended to provide equal facilities and access. Service areas for neighborhood parks should be one-half to three-quarter mile radius unobstructed by roadway or physical barriers. Resident population served should generally not exceed 5,000 to 7,000. Convenient trail linkages from the neighborhood into the park should occur along with community trail connections. Sites selected should posses physical features that accommo- date the basic development program. Characteristics should include gently rolling terrain with well drained soils, partially wooded, regular geometric shape, and street access. Wetland or water basin features are acceptable and may be desirable, however, soil or drainage conflicts should not result. Neighborhood parks will also provide special use facilities such as archery, horseshoe courts, and bocce courts on a community and park district basis. Service areas and facility distribution pose considerations for the location of special use facilities. Service Area: Approximately one-half mile radius uninterrupted by principal roadways or major physical barriers. Secondary service to residences within three-quarter mile radius. Neighborhood parks should ideally be 15 to 18 acres in size for both active and passive uses. Ten acres can be adequate, and park size will rarely exceed 20 acres. In some cases, joint use of elementary or middle school sites should be considered to minimize duplication of active recreation facilities. Neighborhood park sites should provide for a variety of uses and possess land characteristics which allow for informal ball field play as well as canopy vegetation for picnicking. Per Capita Standard: 2.5 to 3.5 developed acres per 1,000 population. Primary Function/User Groups: The park should provide informal neighborhood open space with provisions for active recreation use and passive uses that respond to residential neighborhood needs. Primary users will be neighborhood children and families, as well as youth organized athletic functions. Locational Characteristics: Centrally located within service area or defined neighborhood, the park may be adjacent to • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SAGAN. MN 4-13 • • 4 STANDARDS elementary or middle school facilities or other park elements. Primary access should occur by pedestrian or bicycle means. Neighborhood parks should be connected by the community trail system. Secondary means should include street access with vehicle parking facilities provided. Adjacent land use will typically be residential (limited to two edges), school grounds, collector roadway, or community open space. Natural characteristics should include topography that has flat to rolling terrain and well -drained soils compatible with facility development. Vegetation should be representative of the neighborhood, partially wooded preferred. Visibility should allow good sight lines into parcel for park security. Water features such as ponds, streams, or wetlands should be included if they are compatible with facility development and do not pose safety problems. Natural areas will provide opportunity for outdoor education, resource preservation, and restoration of sensitive areas. Typical Facilities: A. Active • Ballfield (not lighted) compatible for softball, baseball, or soccer use may be programmed for youth league requiring full-size facilities (250 feet x 250 feet). • Creative play structures and apparatus for children of varying ages including tots (2 to 5 years), young children (5 to 6), and older children (9 to 12). • Trails —both internal loops and access to community system. • Multi -use hard -surface play court (basketball, court games). B. Passive • Picnic accommodations for small groups. • Park benches. • Walking trails and trail connections to neighborhood and community trail system. C. Support Elements • Trash containers. • Landscaping with native plant materials. • Identification sign. • Opportunity for parking (8 to 10 vehicles), handicap accessible. Parks with hockey rinks will require additional parking. ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES.. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAQAN. MN 4.7 4 STANDARDS Park shelter or sun shelter for principal neighborhood parks (15 acres and larger). Security lighting. D. Other Comments/Optional Facilities Community -based facilities such as ice skating. Active area should be oriented away from residential edges. Parcels should not be fragmented in layout. Summer programming optional. Outdoor hockey rinks with lighting and free skating rinks may be located in neighborhood parks where a park shelter is located. Parking (on -street or off-street) amounting to 20 to 30 spaces per park should be provided adjacent hockey rinks. Tennis courts (optional, can vary by location and service area distribution). Community Athletic Field Community athletic fields are targeted toward organized adult and youth play on a citywide basis. The majority of the users for these facilities will come beyond a walking range and as a result will require adequate parking and available restrooms. Community playfields should respond to the following types of athletic facility needs: softball fields, baseball fields, and soccer/ football fields. Other compatible facilities that can be considered include multiple tennis courts, hockey rinks, and pleasure skating rinks. Facility use and team competition play may require site lighting and irrigation to extend their usable hours. Community athletic fields should be maintained with more intensity than other parks due to the amount of use and level of play. Community athletic fields generally service populations up to 25,000. Their service base relates primarily to individual facility needs and the demands placed on them by user groups. Minimum size should not be less than 20 acres with optimum size 30 acres or larger. Locations near thoroughfares to accommodate vehicle access and traffic movement is preferred. Joint use of facilities with middle or senior high schools can be considered where schedules and maintenance requirements agree. Athletic facilities require regular shaped parcels, flat topography, and well drained soils. Service Area: Communitywide. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 4-S • • • 4 STANDARDS Desirable Size in Acres: Minimum 20 developed acres, maximum 60 developed acres. Per Capita Standard: 2 to 3 developed acres per 1,000 population. Primary Function/User Groups: Participants and spectators in athletic activities, which may be organized or informal and which utilize the athletic fields and court facilities. Locational Characteristics: Facilities should be located close to community collector or minor arterial roadway on a site whose topography has minimal change. Proximity to secondary schools may be desirable to allow for shared use of facilities. Non- residential adjacent land uses preferred due to potential field lighting. Facilities should be centrally located within the community or may be dispersed if multiple sites are developed and distributed throughout the community. Typical Facilities: A. Active • Baseball. • Softball. • Football. • Soccer. • Basketball complex (multiple courts). • Tennis complex (multiple courts). • Play apparatus (optional). • Free skating (optional). • Ice hockey (optional, where adequate facility need exists). B. Passive • Spectator seating and bleacher areas. • Picnic facilities for group events and tournaments. • Trails connecting facilities and links to the community trail system. C. Support Facilities • Vehicle parking for players and spectators, including buses. • Comfort facility including restrooms and concessions. • Storage facilities. • Waste receptacles. • Lighting. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 4-9 4 STANDARDS Community Park Community parks should be differentiated from neighborhood parks by two factors: size and function. Community parks should be a minimum of 25 acres in size with facilities or uses targeted for multiple neighborhoods or the entire City of Eagan. Their location should capitalize upon lakes, rivers, or wooded areas that appeal to larger groups and provide for community access. Facilities should be sized and developed to accommodate large crowd and peak events. Community festivals, events, and holidays should be considered in locating and planning the parks. Facilities are often related to the park's natural resource base. Activities typically include walking, picnicking (family and large group), viewing, passive sports for large groups, and organized community events. Service Area: Ranging from several neighborhoods within two - to three-mile radius to the entire community. Per Capita Standard: Five to eight acres per 1,000 population. Desirable Size in Acres: Minimum size 25 acres with 50 to 100 acres desirable. Primary Function/User Groups: Extensive area for community - wide use that may provide active, passive, educational, cultural, or programmed functions for all age groups. Community parks should integrate unusual or attractive natural features such as water bodies into the park for preservation and recreational use. Good access from collector or minor arterial roadways is desirable. Typical Facilities: A. Active Beachfront. Boat access. • Multi -use trails. • Active facilities compatible with large group picnics such as volleyball, horseshoes, softball, or court games. Play structure(s) for various age groups. Pavilion or sun shelter. Winter activity facilities. B. Passive • Picnic facilities. • Seating with attractive views. ■ARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAOAN. MN 4-10 • • • 4 STANDARDS • Fishing. • Nature interpretation. C. Support Facilities • Comfort facilities with restrooms which may integrate an information center, picnic facility, storage or other building requirements. • Parking for large groups and community events. • Signage. • Adequate waste collection and storage. • Lighting. Linear Park Parks with this designation function to accommodate varying trail modes, however, they typically incorporate wider right-of-way or parcel widths. Linear park uses can include walking, hiking, biking, and cross-country skiing. The community's trail system should capitalize upon linear parks, however, the entire system will not be comprised of linear park elements. Natural corridors such as drainageways and wooded areas can serve as linear parks. Similarly, cultural or legal features such as utility right-of-way, easements, abandoned rail corridors, park roadways, and property linkages can also be designated. The principal objective of linear parks is to preserve sufficient resource base such that trail users can appreciate its character and that the natural qualities are conserved through designation and operation policies. Service Area: Communitywide. Desirable Size in Acres: Varies by use and function. Per Capita Standard: Not applicable. Primary Function/User Groups: Area that provides for recreational hiking, commuting, biking, cross-country skiing, wheelchair users, or other linear trail modes. Locational Characteristics: Typically includes natural or designated corridors such as utility rights -of -way, or natural features including bluff lines, vegetation patterns, water features, and other characteristics consistent with recreational use. Linear parks may be nature trails, and often Zink other activity nodes such as parks, schools, other community features, residential neighborhoods, or community commercial areas. They are ■ARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 411 4 STANDARDS distinct from typical trail corridors by wider right-of-way and the use of facility amenities. Typical Facilities: Trails are the typical development within linear parks and may provide for a variety of recreational modes. Support facilities should be provided such as rest areas, comfort facilities, interpretive and informational signing, access points, parking areas, trailheads, and overlooks. Conservancy Area Conservancy areas have one primary goal, that is, to conserve and manage sensitive natural areas within the community. Large wetlands, sensitive or unique vegetation, storm drainageways, retention ponds, and unique environmental areas should be preserved by this conservation designation. Many potential conservation areas are protected by environmental regulations. Therefore, when possible, conservation areas should be acquired through means other than park dedication or direct purchase, such as tax forfeiture procedures, developer dedication, utility easement, drainage easement, and conservation. Limited passive recreation can be allowed within conservation areas provided that their use is compatible with the management and intent of the parcel. Such activities may include nature interpretation areas, hiking and biking trails, picnicking, and wildlife observation. Trail surfaces should be wood chip or aglime and allow for multiseasonal use including cross-country skiing or snow shoeing. Limited hard surface trails may also be employed. Active recreational uses should be restricted from parcels with this classification. Service Area: Communitywide. Per Capita Standard: Not applicable. Desirable Size in Acres: Variable. Primary Function/User Groups: Uses are limited to passive hiking or other trail modes consistent with resource preservation, conservation, or specific management requirements necessary to maintain the area's natural characteristics. Locational Characteristics: Conservation designations should be used in areas of special environmental sensitivity including creek valleys, wetlands, bogs, lake front views, unusual vegetation, storm drainage areas, retention ponds, or unique bluff areas. Typical Facilities: Developed facilities should be limited to elements compatible with resource preservation or management • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 412 • • • 4 STANDARDS and may include passive trails, interpretive signing, controlled vehicle access, or trail access through signing. Special Use Parks and Facilities Facilities that provide special activities, unique built environments, or single purpose events fit in this classification. Their need should respond to distinct markets, demands, or opportunities within the community. Characteristics vary widely in response to the facility, its site, and the demand responded to. Per Capita Standard: Variable. Service Area: Communitywide. Desirable Size in Acres: Varies by function and facility type. Primary Function/User Groups: Areas are for single -purpose recreation activities whose use requires a freestanding facility because of specific parcel characteristics or incompatibility with other recreational areas. Uses typical of this special designation include golf courses, nature centers, conservatories, arboretums, gardens, amphitheaters, or frisbee golf. Locations will be dictated by the use's specific needs for unusual physical characteristics such as topography, water features, vegetation, or soils; or those uses that need to be buffered or kept independent of developed areas. CulturaUHistoric Sites At the present time, Eagan has limited sites of historical or cultural significance. The City should work collectively with the Dakota County Historical Society or local interests in Eagan to facilitate such designations. Per Capita Standard: Not applicable. Service Area: Citywide. Desirable Size in Acres: Varies according to historical feature or element to be preserved or interpreted. Size should be minimum one-half acre to encourage use and provide for support facilities. Primary Function/User Groups: Site should preserve or interpret historic areas or buildings of community significance with endorsement by local historical commission. Locational Characteristics: Determined by historic site. Typical Facilities: Sites may be land parcels or structures which have unusual or unique historic significance to the community BARTON ASCI-IIMAN Ari5OCIATES. INC. PARK SY ST KM PLAN{ SAGAN., MN 4-13 4 STANDARDS and merit preservation, interpretation, or other related community uses. Facilities vary according to need for preservation, interpretive function, and security. Support facilities may include parking, comfort facilities, trails, and signing. Regional Facilities Regional park elements, namely county, state and federal facilities, are accessible to Eagan residents (refer to Chapter 3) and must be considered in the overall structure of park classification. In general, regional facilities are intended to provide substantial open space, to preserve and manage sensitive natural resources or to provide unique, special use facilities. Regional park elements also may include intercommunity facilities such as trails, linear parks and river corridors. Service area, facility size and typical facilities vary due to the resource diversity and various agencies involved. Therefore, regional facilities contribute variety, capacity and linkages to other communities in complimenting Eagan's other functional classifications. • PARK SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS BY FUNCTION Each park element within the Eagan system has been classified according to its function (refer to Table 4.2). This hierarchy establishes distinct roles and responsibilities for each park and an expectation of their contribution to the community and the adjacent neighborhood. Secondary functions are also identified where the park contributes more than one role. Classifications may be adjusted over time if community needs suggest change. All new parks should be classified as they are added to the system. • PARK FACILITY STANDARDS Standards for typical facilities found within parks comprising the Eagan system are found in Table 4.3. These standards are intended to guide development of facilities by suggesting desired dimensions, a per capita measurement, and community service radius. Exceptions to these standards will exist. Individual park physical constraints may dictate compromises in facility size or orientation. Community layout may require compromises in per capita or service area radius. However, the standards should guide the evaluation of facility need and development. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4-14 • • • 4 STANDARDS • SUMMARY This chapter provides an update to Eagan's park classifications and facility standards. Standards previously developed in the community's 1983 park system plan are modified and updated based upon community need, use trends, regional, and national trends. These revisions are indicative of ongoing review and changes that community decision -makers and staff should make on a regular basis. Standards are not intended to provide an end to discussion. Rather, standards should stimulate and provoke productive discussions leading to prudent decision - making. Recommendations contained within this chapter modifying the 1983 system plan include: • Change from a "mini -park" to a "neighborhood common" including the classifications description. • Update of individual park classifications within the park system. • Update of activity/facility standards (refer to Table 4.3). BARTON ALCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 4.15 4 STANDARDS • provoke productive discussions leading to prudent decision - making. Recommendations contained within this chapter modifying the 1983 system plan include: Change from a "mini -park" to a "neighborhood common" including the classifications description. Update individual park classifications within the park system. Update activity/facility standards (refer to Table 4.3). TABLE 4.2 PARK CLASSIFICATION BY FUNCTION Page 1 of 2 Park Neighborhood Common Neighborhood Park Community Park Community Athletic Field Linear Park Conservancy Area Special Use Site Historic Site Barbara Curry • • Berry Patch Park • • Blackhawk Park • • Bridle Ridge Park •• Bur Oaks Park • • Captain Dodd Park • Carlson Lake Park • • Carnelian Park • Cedar Pond Park • • • Cinnamon Park • • Clearwater Park • • Country Horne Park • Downing Park • Evergreen Park • Fish Lake Park • Goat Hill Park • • Heine Pond Park • Highline Trail • • Highview Park • Holz Farm Park • • Kettle Park • Lakeside Park • Lexington Park • Lexington/Diffley Athletic Site • Meadowland Park • • Moonshine • • Mueller Farm • Northview Athletic Feld • • Oak Chase Park • George Ohmann Park • • O'Leary Park •• Patrick Eagan Community Park • p Source Barton-Aachman Associates, Inc.; City of Eagan KEY - • Primary Function • Secondary Function 0 Potential Function ■ARTON ASCHPAAN At5OC1ATt!<, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 4,0118 • • • • • 4 STANDARDS TABLE 4.2 PARK CLASSIFICATION BY FUNCTION Page 2 2 Park Neighborhood Common Neighborhood Park Community Park Community Athletic Field Linear Park Conservancy Area Special Use Site of Historic Site Peridot Path Park • • Pilot Knob Park • Quarry Park • Rahn Athletic • • Ravine Park • • Ridgecliff Park • , River Hills Park • Sky Hill Park • Slater Acres Park • South Oaks Park • • Thomas L ke Park • • Thomas Lake East Trapp Farrn Park • Walden Heights Park • Walnut Hill (incl. East) • • Wandering Walk • Wescott Station Park • • Wescott Square Commons • Windcrest Woodhaven Park • , Unnamed (Daniel DrivelDiffley) • Unnamed (William Bros.) • FUTURE PARKS Park Service Area 115 0 0 Park Service Area 116 0 Perk Service Area *18 0 Park Service Area *21 0 0 Perk Service Area N22 0 0 Park Service Area 836E 0 ource. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.; City of Eagan KES- 4 Pr,mAry 1.',n...,... . .. otentlal Function QARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4-17 4 STANDARDS TABLE 4.3 EAGAN PARK FACILITY STANDARDS Page 1 of 2 Activity/Facility Recommended Space Requirements Recommended Size and Dimensions Recommended Orientation No. of Units per Population" Service Area Location Notes Basketball' Hardcourt (multiuse surface) 2,400-3,036 sq ft. Full court 60' x 120' with 5 unobstructed apace on all sides Half court (multiuse): 40' x 40' Long axis north- south Full court: 1 per 5,000 No existing standard One full court per park planning Safe walking or bike access to outdoor courts in neighborhood parka or active recreation areas in other park/school settings. Ice Hockey 22,000 sq ft. including support area plus parking Rink 85' x 200' (minimum 85' x 185'). Additional 5,000 eq. ft. support area. Long axis north- south Outdoor: 1 per 3,000 1 per 3,000 1-2 mile Best as part of multipurpose neighborhood park. Free Skating Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. Oval shape Varies None 1 per 5,000 No existing standard 3/4-1 1/4 mile Usually in a neighborhood park Tennis Single court- minimum of 7,200 sq. ft. Twin court. 120' x 120' (14,400 sq. ft.) 36' x 78'. 12' clearance on both sides; 21' clearance on both ends Long axis north- south 1 court per 2,000 Existing standard: 1 court per 1,750 3/4-1 1/4 mile Best in batteries of 2 or more. Located in neighborhood parks or multiple courts within community athletic fields or school sites. Volleyball (sand) Minimum of 2,000 sq. ft. Single: 30' x 60'. Minimum 10' clearance on all sides Long axis north- south 1 court per 5,000 No existing standard 1-2 mile Same as other court activities (e.g., tennis, etc.) Football Minimum 1.5A 160 x 300' w/o end zones. Minimum 6' clearance on all sides. Long axis north- south 1 per 20,000 No existing standard 1-2 mile Best in community athletic fields or school athletic complex Soccer 1.7 to 2.1A Full size: 250' x 360' 10' clearance on all aides Long axis north- south 1 per 5,000 1 per 5,000 1.2 mile Youth soccer on smaller fields adjacent to schools or in neighborhood parks. "' Standards above the dashed line indicate recommended standards; standards below the dashed line are those from the 1983 plan. Source. Barton-Aachman Associates, Inc.; City of Eagan • • • ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4.18 • • 4 STANDARDS TABLE 4.3 EAGAN PARK FACILITY STANDARDS Page 2 of 2 Activit /Facilit y y Recommended Space p Requirements Recommended Size and Dimensions Recommended Orientation No. of Units per Populations"' Service Area Location Notes Baseball J. Pull size 2 Youth Mites' Squirts Minors Majors Minimum 3.0- 3.85A Minimum 1.2A Base Linea Baselines-90' Pitching distance-60 1/2' Foul lines -min. 320' Center field-400'+ Foul lines-200' Center field-200'-250' Pitching Distance 15' (min.) 25' (min.) 46' 52' Locate home plate so pitcher throwing across sun and batter not facing it. Line from home plate through pitcher's mound running east-northeast. 1 per 6,000 or Lighted-1 per 15,000 1 per 8,000 2-3 mile Lighted fields part of community complex 50' 60' 60' 75'-83' Softball Adult/EAA) Girls Mites "' Minis ' Minors " Juniors Intermediates Seniors 1.5 to 2.0A Baselines Baselines-65' Pitching distance-50' Slow pitch field radius from plate-300' Pitching Distance Frequently with multi- orientation in pods of 3 or 4. 1 per 2,000 (schedulable fields) 2-3 mile Community athletic field sites. 35' 35' 50' 60' 60' 65' 28' 28' 31' 38 43' 46' Source: City of Eagan National Recreation and Parks Association Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. These groups utilize informal "ballfield" facilities BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4-'19 4 STANDARDS BARTON ASCNNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 4•BO • Needs and Demands Analysis • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS CHAPTER 5: NEEDS AND DEMANDS ANALYSIS • INTRODUCTION Eagan has grown at a rapid pace that has posed challenges in meeting existing resident's needs and those of projected population growth through the next two decades. This chapter analyzes those community needs that currently exist and likely community needs projected in 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010. A number of different techniques are used to analyze and document park, recreation, and open space needs within the community. This approach reinforces the needs analysis objec- tivity and those conclusions arrived upon. Tools employed within the chapter include: • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) data • A comparison to accepted national acreage standards • Neighborhood park service area analysis • Participation rate trends and athletic association participation projections A summary of each follows. • REGIONAL RECREATIONAL DEMAND - MINNESOTA DNR SCORP The single most influential factor in the provision of recreation facilities is public demand. The State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), is prepared by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Office of Planning. Its purpose is to guide recreation -related land acquisition, facility development and recreation programming on a statewide level. The current SCORP is based upon a cross-section survey of 2,400 Minnesota residents conducted in 1988. Its outcome establishes a directive for the period 1990 through 1994. DNR with the assistance of the Outdoor Recreation Planning Advisory Committee (ORPAC), is currently drafting SCORP's Recreation Issues and Strategies to guide planning in the late 1990s (1995- 1999). The revised SCORP should be consulted when the document is completed. SCORP's principal objective is to provide up-to-date accurate information which will enable policy -makers and the public to BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6.1 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS establish goals and priorities for recreation facilities. The SCORP also provides an equitable basis for the distribution of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to state and local governments. SCORP survey results are tabulated according to the DNR's six regional areas of which the metropolitan seven -county area is one. This approach allows for region to region as well as region to statewide comparisons for recreation demand and the adequacy of existing facilities. Table 5.1 provides a summary of the metro area and statewide SCORP survey taken in 1988. SCORP survey respondents, both metro area and statewide placed the highest priorities on natural park areas, wildlife and nature observation, and walking paths. Bicycle paths and trails, swimming beaches, nature and history interpretation, and picnic grounds ranked next in order of importance. This varied somewhat from other statewide priorities. Rankings of other activity facility -types and public response are also illustrated by the table. Table 5.2 assists in understanding how Minnesotans prioritize their recreation time by category and trends that are likely to arise through the year 2000 in the allocation of this time. For example, Minnesotans on average spent 18 percent of their recreation hours hiking or walking, 12 percent biking, and 12 percent fishing. The SCORP projects that walking/hiking time will increase by 29 percent through the year 2000, fishing will increase by 14 percent, and biking by 7 percent. These projections greatest accuracies are in traditional activities such as fishing in contrast to those which have witnessed significant trends such as mountain biking. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAOAN, MN 6•M • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.1 1988 SCORP SURVEY OF HOUSEHOLDS: METRO AREA VERSUS STATEWIDE Metro Responses wide Region Important Important Important Need More Enough 1 1 Natural park areas 62.2% 30.8% 93.0% 39.0% 51.8% 2 2 Wildlife & nature observation 53.1 37.2 90.3 50.8 36.0 3 3 Walking paths 56.0 32.1 88.1 51.7 34.9 8 4 Bicycle paths & trails 41.3 42.2 83.5 51.1 30.3 6 5 Swimming beaches 46.2 36.9 83.0 41.2 41.6 5 6 Nature & history interpretation 31.6 51.4 82.9 37.2 41.8 4 7 Picnic grounds 28.4 53.3 81.7 27.1 53.3 9 8 Paved shoulders for bikes 54.3 25.8 80.1 66.9 12.1 7 9 Lake accesses 40.6 35.7 76.3 36.3 38.5 10 10 Flower gardens 28.9 44.8 73.7 40.8 30.3 12 11 Hiking trails 34.9 38.6 73.5 39.0 30.3 14 12 Skating & hockey rinks 29.0 42.2 71.2 29.7 40.8 13 13 Athletic fields 35.2 35.1 70.3 20.8 47.1 11 14 Campgrounds 38.4 31.6 70.1 30.9 36.9 17 15 XC ski trails 29.1 38.3 67.4 38.8 25.4 15 16 Shore fishing areas 32.9 29.7 62.6 34.7 27.4 16 17 River & stream access 28.0 34.4 62.4 32.0 28.0 18 18 Playgrounds 30.0 28.1 58.1 13.5 43.7 19 19 Swimming pools 25.0 30.9 55.9 38.3 16.6 20 20 Downhill ski areas 21.2 34.1 55.3 21.0 33.2 21 21 Tennis courts 18.1 35.2 53.3 18.9 32.7 22 22 Golf courses 22.6 28,7 51.3 16.7 33.7 27 23 Horseback trails 11.1 26.5 37.6 23.3 10.6 23 24 Waterfowl hunting areas 19.3 17.2 36.5 14.8 19.6 26 25 Basketball courts 10.4 23.4 33.9 17.2 15.6 24 26 Snowmobile trails 12.2 18.4 30.6 16.9 12.2 25 27 Big game hunting areas 15.3 13.2 28.6 11.0 16.9 28 28 Upland game hunting areas 12.0 14.7 26.7 12.5 12.7 29 29 Shooting ranges 6.6 15.0 21.7 12.3 8.0 32 30 Scuba diving areas 5.6 15.7 21.3 14.7 5.1 31 31 Field dog training areas 4.3 14.5 18.8 7.8 8.1 30 32 ATV trails & areas 6.2 12.2 18.4 10.5 6.6 33 33 4WD trails & areas 3.6 8.9 12.6 8.1 4.3 1) Ranked according to Metro Region priority. Source: Outdoor Recreation Facility Adeouacv Survey MnDNR, April 1989 State- Metro Facility Type"' Very Somewhat Have MAR TON ASCFMAN ASSOCIAT S% INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 5.3 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.2 MINNESOTA RECREATION ACTIVITIES Activity Outdoor Recreation Hours Per Capita Activity, 1985 Percent Allocation Projected Percent Increase in Recreation Hours by Activity, 1985-2000 Walking/Hiking 18% 29% Biking 12 7 Fishing 12 14 Driving 8 10 Swimming 6 4 Boating 5 5 Hunting 4 4 Nature Observation 4 6 Sight Seeing 3 4 Golfing 3 5 Camping 3 3 Other Activities 22 (12 activities) 9 (11 activities) Source: Minnesota DNR, SCORP, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN S•4 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Specific information is contained within the SCORP regarding urban natural resources. In 1990, the seven -county metropolitan area was approximately 18 percent developed illustrating a relatively low population density despite its urban context. Of the remaining undeveloped lands, 43 percent are cultivated, 20 percent open space and pasture, and 11 percent forested. The plan projects substantial metro area growth in the coming years placing greater demand on urban open space and undeveloped areas. According to the SCORP, urban residents are a significant influence on the state's natural resources. In 1980, 44 percent of Minnesotans who hunt or fish were urban residents. Two- thirds of the state's bird watching/natural center occasions originate in the metro area and approximately half of Minnesotans who enjoy watching wildlife are urban residents. Both urban and suburban residents place a high value on environmental quality and are less willing to compromise these values than other Minnesotans. Suburban residents have the greatest knowledge and interest in outdoor activities of any group of state residents. The SCORP document also draws attention to meeting the needs of special populations. According to a study conducted on behalf of the Amhurst Wilder Foundation, approximately 30 percent of the metropolitan area adults have one or more special needs in contrast to 9 percent of the statewide population. The study suggests that special need groups will become increasingly larger portion of the population as it ages in aggregate. • SCORP RECREATION ISSUES AND STRATEGIES (1995-1999) The Minnesota DNR, with assistance from an advisory group of professionals from the public and private sectors as well as citizens and organizations has formulated a list of issues and strategies intended to guide recreation providers, researchers and policy -makers between 1995-1999. Input from these individuals identified six general issues form which strategies and actions should be focused. Issues included: 1. Sustainable Outdoor Recreation: obtaining a balanced, coordinated and environmentally sustainable approach to meeting future needs of Minnesota's outdoor recreation. 2. Roles and Responsibilities: clearly identifying appropriate roles and responsibilities between public and private sector outdoor recreation providers. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B-5 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS 3. Capital Investment: the provision of funding to allow outdoor recreation facilities to meet growing outdoor recreation needs for recreation space, especially in rapidly growing areas. 4. Liability and Litigation: a response to concerns limiting recreation opportunities and increasing costs to recreation providers. 5. Operations and Maintenance: identifying funding for maintenance to minimize facility deterioration and diminished value of facilities. 6. Recreation Research: the need for up-to-date information to establish effective priorities for facility and program development. The SCORP plan currently being updated identifies goal, strategies, and objectives in response to these specific issues. These action statements are intended to guide available staff and capital investments in response to identified issues. Public recreation funding such as the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) and capital bonding funds will likely prioritize potential projects according to the SCORP plan. Minnesota's SCORP study has significance for Eagan in that it provides a broad analysis of the metro area recreation trends and needs for outdoor recreation. SCORP information serves as the basis for distributing statewide funds and can be considered as a forecast of those project types which have priority and will receive funding allocations. Statewide demographics as acknowledged by the SCORP survey process may be inconsis- tent with Eagan's population. However, as Eagan matures, its demographics will likely move closer to that of the metro areas, paralleling the region's issues and needs for open space facilities. Of greater significance, may be the funding opportunities presented by state grants and those evaluation criteria affixed to SCORP priorities. City staff should monitor available funding and grants requirements consistent with community priorities and long-term goals. SCORP information currently available from DNR is subject to revision in the near term and greater depth as activity participation rates change. The information should be inserted and interpreted as a component of the system plan. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6-8 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS • PARK LAND AREA COMPARED WITH NATIONAL NORMS The City of Eagan presently has approximately 1,126.9 acres of parkland. This figure is comprised of 8.5 acres of mini -parks, 377 acres of neighborhood parks, 311.7 acres of community parks, and 226.8 acres of athletic fields. The remaining acreage is committed to functional classifications normally associated with passive use including linear park and conservancy areas. Needs for additional parkland can be identified by comparison with national standards. Table 5.3 lists per capita park acreage national standards or norms for active use purposes within a municipal park system. These standards indicate a range of park acreage for such active uses as ballfields, athletic facilities, play equipment, parking, and similar developed uses. Passive or inactive conservation parcels are not considered by these standards and these respective use acreages should be subtracted from total areas before any comparisons are made. Usable, active park area use is reduced in most municipal parks due to a variety of constraints. Eagan is no exception. The effective, usable area in virtually all of Eagan's parks must take into consideration natural limitations including wetlands, drainage basins, steep slopes, and wooded areas. These factors obviously contribute to park aesthetics and provide passive conservation areas for the community. However, the effective usable area of the park is reduced. The following per capita park acreage standards establish general guidelines for active use (developed) parcels. Ranges for the various classifications exemplify minimum to desirable acreage per 1,000 residents. Ranges are derived for norms of cities across the United States. Acreage standards are intended to identify substantial inadequacies by functional area rather than as a tool to fine tune individual system elements. TABLE 5.3 PER CAPITA PARK ACREAGE STANDARDS FOR ACTIVE USE (DEVELOPED/USABLE)' PARCELS Classification Acre per 1,000 Population2 Neighborhood Common (Mini -Park) Neighborhood Park Athletic Field Community Park 0.25 - 0.5 2.50 - 3.5 2.00 - 3.0 5.00 - 8_0 9.75 - 15.5 Developed/usable acreage is that land available for existing or future active recreation purposes. 2 Range designated minimum to desirable. Source: National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA); Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. BARTON ASCHN1AN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6.7 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Nationally, most municipal parks include a balance of active and passive land uses. Active use acreage can be estimated based upon industry trends. For example, neighborhood commons (mini -parks) are typically 80 percent active, neighborhood parks- 60 percent, community playfields-80 percent, and community parks-60 percent. Table 5.4 suggests the current allocation of "usable" active versus "open space" passive park acreage. These figures will be the basis for comparison with national standards. According to the table, Eagan's existing park base yields approximately 385.6 acres of active area. Table 5.4 identifies by park the usable acreage currently obligated to active recreation and the reserve acreage available for future active recreation. For example, an existing volleyball court is classified as usable active area whereas an area set aside for a future volleyball court is measured as reserve. Fifty-five parcels currently comprise the Eagan system, amounting to 1,126.9 acres. Usable acres amount to 448.8, 385.6 acres existing for active use and 63.2 acres as reserve. Approximately 678.1 acres are designated as open space. Table 5.5, Future Active Area Recommendations, translates National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) norms into future year acreage recommendations. The following discussion points are inferred. Neighborhood commons (mini -park) acreage is currently below national norms. Eagan has minimized its neighborhood commons to date through prudent land and park planning. However, requests for neighborhood commons is likely to increase with development service areas when access to neighborhood parks is difficult. Neighborhood park active acreage currently fits within the norms. Neighborhood parks planned through the communities' build -out will continue to fit within the norm range through the year 2010. Once again, the communities' park planning has demonstrated its commitment to neighborhood parks. Community athletic field active acreage is also aligned with national norms. Although Eagan residents participate in great numbers, the city has been able to maximize use and existing facilities through creativity in scheduling. According to the norms, an abnormal commitment to athletic field acreage has not occurred. • • • ■ARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGANL MN 5.B • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.4 PARK ACREAGE BY FUNCTION Functional Classification Open Space (acres) Usable (acres) Total Existing Reserve Barbara Curry LP 8.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 Berry Patch Park LP 6.0 1.6 0.0 7.6 Blackhawk Park CP 71.0 10.0 2.0 83.0 Bridle Ridge Park NP 8.0 12.0 0.0 20.0 Bur Oaks Park NP 50.7 5.0 3.0 58.7 Captain Dodd Park NP 9.0 6.0 0.0 15.0 Carlson Lake Park SU 10.0 2.4 0.0 12.4 Carnelian Park NP 0.0 7.5 0.0 7.5 Cedar Pond Park CP 3.8 3.9 0.0 7.7 Cinnamon Park C 4.5 3.0 0.0 7.5 Clearwater Park SU 9.4 4.4 0.0 13.8 Country Home Park NP 0.0 4.3 0.0 4.3 Downing Park NP 8.0 7.0 0.5 15.5 Evergreen Park NP 2.0 6.0 0.0 8.0 Fish Lake Park SU 5.4 2.5 0.0 7.9 Goat Hill Park CA 12.8 10.0 0.0 22.8 Heine Pond Park SU 7.5 3.0 0.0 10.5 Highline Trail LP 31.1 10.0 2.0 43.1 Highview Park NP 1.2 6.0 0.0 7.2 Holz Farm Park NP 0.8 4.0 0.0 4.8 Kettle Park NP 1.5 8.0 0.0 9.5 Lakeside Park NP 3.7 3.0 0.0 6.7 Lexington Park NP 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.6 Lexington/Diffley Athletic Site CA 23.0 42.0 0.0 65.0 Meadowland Park NP 2.0 8.0 4.0 14.0 Moonshine NP 3.9 0.0 1.0 4.9 Mueller Farm NP 4.0 5.0 1.0 10.0 Northview Athletic Field CA 21.0 38.0 5.0 64.0 Oak Chase Park NP 2.0 3.0 0.0 5.0 George Ohmann Park CA 0.5 14.5 0.0 15.0 O'Leary Park NP 9.8 7.0 0.0 16.8 Patrick Eagan Community Park CP 93.0 4.0 5.0 102.0 Peridot Path Park LP 0.7 5.5 0.0 6.2 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT SAGAN, MN 6.9 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.4 PARK ACREAGE BY FUNCTION Functional Classification Open Space (acres) Usable (acres) Total Existing Reserve Pilot Knob Park NP 6.0 4.0 0.0 10.0 Quarry Park NP 0.0 9.9 0.0 9.9 Rahn Athletic CA 28.0 27.0 5.0 60.0 Ravine Park C 14.2 0.0 0.0 14.2 Ridgecliff Park NP 1.6 15.0 0.0 16.6 River Hills Park NP 0.0 4.1 0.0 4.1 Sky Hill Park NP 2.0 8.0 2.0 12.0 Slater Acres Park NP 4.2 4.3 0.0 8.5 South Oaks Park NP 0.5 4.1 0.0 4.6 Thomas Lake Park CP 53.5 6.0 0.0 59.5 Thomas Lake East C 7.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 Trapp Farm Park CP 46.5 12.0 1.0 59.5 Walden Heights Park NP 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 Walnut Hill (incl. East) NP 23.6 11.0 2.0 36.6 Wandering Walk LP 27.0 0.0 6.0 33.0 Wescott Station Park NP 16.8 15.0 0.0 31.8 Wescott Square Commons C 0.0 1.0 00 1.0 Windcrest LP 10.0 0.0 2.3 12.3 Woodhaven Park NP 13.0 11.0 0.0 24.0 Unnamed (Daniel Drive/Diffley) C 3.8 0.0 1.0 4.8 Park Service Area #16 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 Unnamed (William Bros.) LP 6.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.8 0.0 2.0 10.8 TOTALS 678.1 385.6 63.2 1,126.9 Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Key to Primary Function Classification: NC = Neighborhood Common NP = Neighborhood Park CP = Community Park CA = Community Athletic Field LP = Linear Park C = Conservancy Area SU = Special Use Site H = Historic Site • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 6-10 • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.5 FUTURE ACTIVE AREA RECOMMENDATIONS"' Function Classification Neighborhood Common Neighborhood Park Community Athletic Field Community Park Total Per Capita National Standards Acres/1,000 Population 0.5 acres 2.5 - 3.5 acres 2.0 - 3.0 acres 5.0 - 8.0 acres Existing Eagan Parks (1994) Number of Parks (Developed) 2 28 5 5 40 Usable (Acres) --Existing"' 4.0 184.8 131.5`Z' 35.9 356.2 Usable (Acres)--Reservef3' 0.0 17.9 10.0 8.0 35.9 Open Space (Acres) 4>f 174.3 $5,3 267.8 531.8 Total 8.5 377.0 226.8 311.7 924.0 1995 Active Acreage Needs 23 139 - 194 111 - 166 278 - 440 556 - 801 Population 55,500 (-14.5) (+183 - 238) (+61 - 116) [-128 - (+34)] (+123 - 368) 2000 Active Acreage Needs 32 159 - 222 127 - 190 317 - 508 635 • 921 Population 63,500 (-23.5) (+155 - 218) (+37 - 100) [-196 - (-5)] (+3 - 289) 2005 Active Acreage Needs 33 165 - 231 132 - 198 330 - 528 660 - 957 Population 66,000 (-24.5) (+146 - 212) (+29 - 95) [-216 - (-18)] [-33 - (+264)] 2010 Active Acreage Needs 34 171 - 240 137 - 205 342 - 548 684 • 993 Population 68,500 (-25.5) (+137 - 206) (+22 - 90) [-236 - (-30)] [-69 - (+240)] "Acreage has been divided between "Usable Acreage -Existing," or active park area, and "Usable Acreage -Reserve," or passive park area. Future year calculations assume Usable Acreage -Existing and provide a deficit/surplus statement, in parenthesis. Ranges in deficit/surplus reflect the related range in suggested per capita acreage. Mi Assumes construction of Lexington-DifIley W1 Figures shown in paranthesis suggest future needs in acres based upon existing acreage. Source: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Population Source: City of Eagan Per Capita Standards: National Recreation and Park Association CARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAUAN. MN 6-Y1 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Community park acreage for active uses appears to be low. While this discrepancy appears significant, the gap likely results from different interpretation of usable (active) versus open space (passive). Due to population growth, a demand for active community park space will increase. Activities include lakefront, multiuse trails, court games, and functions associated with picnicking. Aside from population growth, community park adequacy should also consider geographic distribution and the role of regional facilities. Existing community parks are conveniently located and accessed by the central and southern portions of Eagan. However, the northern tier area lacks a community park. Opportunities for community park acquisition and development currently exist within the northern tier based upon available land with attractive natural resource. Regional parks such as Lebanon Hills may also factor into community park adequacy. While Eagan is fortunate to include this regional facility within its corporate limits, Lebanon Hills' southern location does not assist in meeting Eagan's need for a northern community park. Furthermore, minimal development exists within Lebanon Hills and future development plans remain unclear. Eagan staff should monitor the County's long-range park planning for facility changes that may pose issues or opportunities for Eagan community park needs. National standards used in conjunction with this analysis are intended to identify substantial inconsistencies within the system and to determine functional area deficiencies. Further fine tuning of the system's individual elements should be accomplished by other activity standards or by community survey results. • ATHLETIC FACILITY NEEDS Youth and adutt athletic programs are offered through athletic associations and city recreation. The focus of this section is to examine the facility needs of these activities based upon participation rates, variables that contribute to facility demand, and the future implications for facility adequacy. Youth athletic association participation is primarily organized through the Eagan Athletic Association (EAA). Sports and activities organized by the EAA include: • Boys' and girls' basketball • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAGAN. MN B-1B • • s 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Boys' baseball Girls' softball Boys' and girls' soccer Bantam soccer Track Football Ice ringette (became an EAA sport in 1993-94) EAA programs are provided to youth who live in the City of Eagan and youth within school district boundaries which extend beyond city limits. Currently, the EAA does not provide wrestling or volleyball events. Youth hockey in Eagan is run and organized by the Eagan Hockey Association (EHA). EHA activities are focused upon Eagan participants. Limited participation within the EHA occurs from adjacent communities. Several other organizations provide youth athletic activities, however, their participation is a minor element within the city. For example, the Mend -Eagan Athletic Association represents youth activities within School District 197 including Mendota Heights and West St. Paul. Eagan's participants represent five percent or less of Mend-Eagan's populations. Activities for Mend -Eagan occur in part using Pilot Knob School and Lexington Park facilities. Presently, approximately two percent of Eagan's youth participate in the Rosemount Area Athletic Association (RAAA). A lesser number of youth participate in the Burnsville Athletic Club (BAC), primarily those children living within the southwest corner of Eagan within the Burnsville School District. Each of the associations conduct similar youth activities as the EAA. Adult athletic activities are organized by the City of Eagan Park and Recreation Department. Other organizations like churches and businesses may also provide adult athletic activities within the City and may utilize city facilities. Table 5.6 inventories municipal and school district facilities that contribute athletic fields. Elements are categorized by function. Participation Rates The purpose of this analysis is to anticipate growth for organized athletics resulting from population increases, changing activity popularity, and shifts in demographic characteristics. To assist in understanding each activity's trends, Tables 5.7 through 5.13 summarize past participation rates beginning with 1986, as recorded by the City. Future trends for the years 1995, 2000, BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6.13 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.6 OUTDOOR FACILITIES SUMMARY --CITY OF EAGAN Facility City Facility Non -City Facilities Total Park Planning District Under Construction Subtotal School District 196 S.D. 197 S.D. 191 Subtotal Private 1 2 3 4 5 6 Agreement Schedulable Construction' Baseball 90 ft. fenced 1 -- -- -- 1 -- 2 1 -- -- -- -- 1 -- 3 Baseball 75 ft. fenced 1 -- 1 1 Baseball unfenced -- 8 -- 2 •- -. 10 -- 10 Softball fully fenced 3 -- -- -- 8 -- 6 11 (17) 1 -- -- -- -- 1 4" 16 Ballfield ag lime, no fence 4 4 1 5 4 2 20 1 7 6 1 9 22 .. 42 Soccer 225' x 325' •- 5 1 3 6 (9) 1 -• -- -- -- 1 -- 7 Soccer 180' x 240' -- 1 2 2 -- 5 •• 1 -- -- -- 1 -• 6 Soccer cverlay 1 1 -- 1 2 2 1 7 (8) 5 5 4 -- -- 12 -- 19 Mini -Soccer overlay 4 1 5 -- -- •- -- 1 1 6"' 12 Hcckey 2 4 3 -- 4 1 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 Ho -key temporary 1 1 -• -- -• - -- -- -- 1 Pleasure Skating 2 3 4 2 4 2 17 -- -- -- -- -- -- 17 Tennis Court 4 4 3 5 13 4 33 -- -- 4 -- 5 9 -- 42 urce itv o agan, :arson- c man Associates, nc School fields under constru Lion at Black Hawk Middle School ('95), Glacier Hills ('94), and Pinewood ('94) Elementary, and School *18 UNYSIS agreement annual renewal Blue Cross Blue Shield continuous agreement subject to withdrawal • ■ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN S-14 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS 2005, and 2010 have been generated based upon past participation. These tables also summarize facilities employed to meet the various participants' needs. Facility projections are in turn quantified based upon the potential number of teams and their event activities. The strength of this approach is that it relies primarily upon community participation rates rather than national norms or standards that may not be applicable to Eagan's local characteristics. However, these projections are subject to a large number of variables and external influences. The analysis is intended primarily to stimulate discussion rather than obtain specific conclusions. Variables that affect each projection's accuracy include: 1. The accuracy of city population projections. 2. Changing community demographics as they affect age classifications. 3. Changing per capita participation rates for each activity or youth category. 4. Stability and leadership within Eagan's various athletic associations. 5. Continued facility and programming support on the part of the City for both youth and adult athletic activities. 6. Continued coordination and cooperation between the city and school districts in maintaining adequate facilities. 7. The possibility of participation fees to offset operations and maintenance costs, which may in turn after or reduce participation rates. 8. Popularity and success of professional sport franchises within the Twin Cities metropolitan area. 9. Eagan's new high school which has generated increased athletic interest within the youth community. Construction of an additional high school serving the community would further the trend. A summary of each activity follows. Specific variables germane to age groups or athletic activity types are also identified. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PAPK SYSTEM PLAN; EAG AID MN 6-16 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.7 EAGAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION --BASEBALL PARTICIPATION Year Independent Travel In -House In -House No. of Participants Percent Increase Colts Ponys Majors Minors Squirts Mites 1986 1 0 0 1 4 7 6 12 418 --- 1987 1 2 0 1 4 8 9 14 469 12% 1988 1 3 0 3 6 10 18 15 658 40% 1989 2 5 0 2 9 15 21 20 982 49% 1990 3 5 0 3 10 20 26 22 1,178 20% 1991 3 6 0 5 13 27 29 23 1,414 20% 1992 3 10 0 8 16 28 35 30 1,644 16% 1993 3 9 4 7 18 32 41 36 1,998 21.5% 1995' --- 2,300 15% 2000. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 17% 2005" ' -- - -- -- - -- -- -- 2,900 7% 2010' -- -- - 3,100 7% EAA future year projections. Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. • • ■ARTON ASCI-INLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN. EAGAN, MN 6.98 • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.8 ADULT SO1"113ALL PARTICIPATION Year Women's Softball Men's Recreational Softball Men's Industrial Softball Men's Over 35 Co-Rec Softball Totals Teams Field Capacity Teams Field Capacity Teams Field Capacity Teams Field Capacity Teams Field Capacity Teams Fields Field Capacity Percent of Capacity 1986 24 28 47 56 19 20 9 8 22 24 121 5 140 86% 1987 23 40 62 80 26 28 11 12 13 40 135 8 200 67.5% 1988 29 40 80 80 28 28 11 12 19 40 167 8 200 83.5% 1989 32 40 80 80 28 28 10 12 24 40 174 8 200 87% 1990 31 52 88 104 31 40 9 12 38 52 197 11 260 75% 1991 27 52 96 104 33 40 10 12 40 52 206 11 260 79% 1992 24 52 93 104 37 40 10 12 53 52 217 11 260 83% 1993 24 52 86 104 29 40 12 12 49 52 200 11 260 77% 1995 222fbi 260 2005 254" 278'' PP 2000 264`°' 284' 2010 274`''' 284" Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Notes: A typical standard of one team for every 250 population (ranges 238-267) has emerged based upon past participation trends. Field capacity = number of time slots available. Assumes Lexington-Diffley construction. Projected teams based upon future population and one team per 250 residents. • ■ARTON ASCH MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK 5Y5T<M PLANT KAGAN, MN 5.17 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.9 EAGAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION --SOP 113ALL PARTICIPATION Year Travel In -House In -House No. of Participants P Percent Increase Seniors Intermediate Juniors Minors Minis Mites 1986 2 1 1 2 3 3 0 127 --- 1987 2 2 3 6 4 6 0 229 80% 1988 1 2 2 3 7 7 0 309 35% 1989 0 2 3 7 7 8 0 589 25.8% 1990 2 2 4 9 12 6 10 548 40.8% 1991 2 2 6 13 14 10 10 662 20.8% 1992 5 2 6 14 17 9 10 802 21% 1993 9 3 5 16 20 9 14 895 11.5% 1995" ' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,029 15% 2000°' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,203 17% 2005'' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,287 7% 2010' -- -- -- - -- -- -- 1,377 7% EAA future year projections. Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. • • 'BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAGAN, MN 5.1B • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5. 0 YOUTH SOCCER PARTICIPATION Year In -House Fall Program) Travel (April -October) Bantam No. of Participants No. of Teams No. of Fields No. of Participants No. of Teams No. of Fields Summer Fall No. of Participants No. of Teams No. of Fields No. of Participants No. of Teams No. of Fields 1986 301 18 7"' 120 8 4 73 6 3'd' 148 10 5 1987 438 27 7' 152 10 5 126 10 31d1 233 15 7 1988 454 28 91a' 219 15 62' 134 10 3'd' 286 18 8 1989 514 32 13"' 236 16 6 179 14 4'd' 327 20 10 1990 534 33 13 269 18 6 163 14 41°' 359 22 10 1991 545 34 11 250 16 7 259 16 4 405 24 10 1992 569 34 10 292 18 7 338 22 4 549 34 10 1993 633 40 11 343 22 8 379 24 6 645 40 10 1995" 728 394 436 -- 742 -• -- 2000' 852 -- -- 460 -- -- 510 -- -- 868 -- -- 2005" 912 -- -- 492 -- -• 546 -- -- 929 -- -- 2010" 976 -- -- 526 -- -- 584 -- 994 Source: 'Cit. o aean. arton- c man sociates. nc EAA program used Burnsville facilities for a portion of scheduled events Ivo U 10 fields were overlayed on top of full sized fields Two fields provided for RAAA (R( remount) °i Bantam soccer in hockey rinks EAA futun year projections. SAATON ASCHN AN ASSOCIATE!. INC. PARK SYST EPA PLANT EAGAN, NIN 6.18 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.11 OUTDOOR ICE ORGANIZED EVENT PARTICIPATION Year Youth Program Teams Adult Program Teams Mini- Mites Mites Squirts Peewees Bantams No. of Participants No. of Rinks % Change Ice Ringettes No. of Rinks Broomball 4-Man Hockey Boot Hockey Youth Teams 1986-87 0 6 3 3 1 205 8"' --- 15 1 1/2 14 0 0 1987-88 4 5 3 3 2 225 9'' 10% 15 1 2 31"' 0 0 1988-89 3 3 4 3 2 255 9'" 13% 30 2 1 27 0 0 1989-90 4 5 5 3 3 280 5 10% 30 2 1 24 5 0 1990-91 2 4 5 3 2 286 5 2% 30 2 1 32 8 0 1991-92 5 5 5 4 2 334 5 17% 60 4 1 28 12 8 1992-93 5 6 5 5 3 336 5 09% 90 6 1 33 10 9 1993-94 10 8 5 4 4 465 6 38% 29 2 1 40 11 8 1995' 10/10 8/8 6/6 5/5 5/5 480 2000' 15/18 12/14 8/12 6/10 5/7 580 2005" ' 12/18 12/14 10/12 8/10 6/7 630 2010' --- --- --- -- 690 Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Time allotted to Rosemount Area Hockey. °i Added a second night for men and a new co-rec league. Future year projections represent trends in recent year participation rates. NOTE: Youth hockey program projections for the years 1995, 2000, and 2005 are made by the Eagan Hockey Association. The upper number (numerator) assumes no construction of a civic arena, whereas the lower number (denominator) assumes civic arena construction. • • • ■ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6-EO • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.12 DEVELOPED INDOOR GYMNASIUM FACILITY SUMMARY--EAGAN Year City -Owned S.D. 191 S.D. 196 S.D. 197 Total Elementary Jr. High Elementary Middle School Sr. High Elementary 1986 0 1" 1(`) 2 0 0 1 5 1987 0 1"' 1'") 3 0 0 1 6 1988 0 1'') 1'") 4 0 0 1 7 1989 0 1") 1(`) 4 1 0 1 8 1990 0 1"' 1''' 5 1 1'') 1 10 1991 0 1'') 1"' 6 1 1' 1 11 1992 0 1") 1'') 6 1 1") 1 11 1993 0 1(') 1''' 7 1 1" ' 1 12 Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. ') Limited access/restricted hours. CARTON AWMMAN AfWOCIATtf, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ tAOAN, MN S.RI 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.13 GYMNASIUM BASED PROGRAM PARTICIPATION Year Adult Teams EA Ifutu el Adult Teams EAA Basketballf0i Officiated Volleyball Gym Capacity Recreational Volleyball Gym Capacity Youth Volleyball"' 5-Man Basketball Gym Capacity 3-Man Basketball Gym Capacity In -House Travel No. of Participants No. of Teams No. of Participants No of Teams 1986 5 8 8 8 0 8 8 6 8 99 12 0 0 1987 6 8 30 32 0 14 16 10 12 107 13 0 0 1988 14 16 40 40 0 16 16 15 18 169 21 0 0 1989 6 8 48 48 0 14 16 12 18 464 58 60 6 1990 34 40 51 72 0 16 16 10 12 631 78 90 9 1991 51 56 71 72 0 16 16 10 12 834 104 101 10 1992 75 80 70 72 0 16 16 16 16 987 123 109 10 1993 66 72 70 80 0 14 16 18 18 1,262 152 152 12 Source: City of Eagan, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 'EAA volleyball is not currently organized. It is likely to occur in the future. `°' Obtain space from community education • • • ■ARTON ASCI-MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 6•EII • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS ADULT SOFTBALL PARTICIPATION Eagan Park and Recreation programs currently provide softball organization for women's recreational, men's recreational, men's industrial, men's over 35, and co-rec leagues. Total aggregate per capita participation since 1986 has been reasonably consistent, with a peak participation occurring in years 1991 and 1992. Of the five organized categories, the men's recreational league is far and away the most prominent activity with nearly twice as many teams as the co-rec league. In 1986, adult softball participation took place on five municipal fields. Field use had grown to 11 in 1993. During this time frame, the percent of games scheduled versus the actual field capacity range from 67 to 86 percent. Current 1993 field usage is approximately 77 percent. Staff -computed participation, based upon population and activity rates, has been approximately one team for every 250 (actual range has been one to 238-267). Adult softball leagues currently occur evenings Monday through Friday with regular tournament play on Saturday and Sunday. Eleven fields are utilized, four of which are lighted. Of the remaining seven, three fields at Northview Park could be lighted, whereas the remaining four are unlikely to be lighted due to adjacent neighborhood land uses, field configuration, or other constraints. Playing field dimensions range from 270- to 290- foot field lines. All league play is slow pitch, and fast pitch leagues are not currently contemplated. Future participation projections indicate a continual increase in teams beyond those currently involved. This projection is based upon a relatively stable teams per capita trend witnessed since 1988. The principal variables that affect projections include: 1. An increasing community population, of which a significant element are adults. 2. An aging population with an increasing number of residents in their 40s, 50s, and 60s. Unknown future participation rates within these age groups; will adults continue to play softball at current per capita levels? 3. Will Eagan's active youth athletics serve as a feeder to promote increased adult participation? It should be noted that most of these participants will relocate out of Eagan prior to their early to mid-20s. CARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 8.23 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS YOUTH ACTIVITIES Boys' baseball, as organized by the EAA, is divided into six different age groups with each age group posing individual baseline requirements ranging from 50 feet to a standard 90-foot configuration. The resulting diverse facility requirements challenge both facilities and activity scheduling. Per capita participation rates for in-house and traveling youth have increased steadily since 1986. During that time, in-house participants have increased approximately 300 percent. Traveling teams, formulated in 1988, have also increased rapidly. Girls' softball during the same time period witnessed substantial growth both on a per capita and gross participant count basis. In-house league participation has continually increased on a per capita basis during a period of rapid community growth. Traveling team participation has been somewhat erratic, however, 1993 participant levels witnessed substantial growth. Boys' and girls' soccer participation has also steadily increased. Participants per capita have grown for both in-house and traveling teams. Bantam soccer participation has witnessed similar per capita growth, which when coupled with boys' and girls' age groups poses unmet field demand needs. The principal challenge for soccer facilities is the muttiseasonal requirement that soccer activities need. For example, in-house leagues occur during the fall season whereas traveling participants are involved from March through October. Overlay fields relied upon for soccer activities in mid -August through October are unavailable during the spring and early summer months due to baseball and softball programming. Currently, full size soccer fields do not occur within Eagan, however, five nearly full size fields exist. The remaining fields are reduced sizes with modified goals. Football participation began in earnest in 1990. Stable partici- pation has occurred from 1991 through 1993 with little fluctuation in per capita ratios. Growth has existed within the number of participants as expected due to community population increases. Currently, football fields do not occur within the city park system. Youth hockey within Eagan is organized by the Eagan Hockey Association (EHA). Hockey structure is organized by age groups, consistent with the following table: • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•Q4 e • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Classification Age Grouping 1993 Number of Teams Mini -Mite 5 - 7 years 10 Mites 7 - 9 years 9 Squirts 9 - 11 years 5 PeeWees 11 - 13 years 5 Bantams 13 - 15 years 5 Between 1986 and 1993, the number of EHA youth participants approximately doubled while the actual participants per capita witnessed moderate growth. Eight hockey rinks existed in the community in 1986, increasing to 14 in 1993. Eight of the 14 rinks are available for EHA use. Primary growth within the EHA has been at younger ages. Higher participation rates will likely result in the older categories as children pass through the Mini - Mite to the Bantam teams. Professional hockey activity within the Twin Cities area in part may have contributed to an active EHA participation. It is difficult to anticipate the absence of a professional hockey team and its implication for youth participants. Strong interest at Eagan's new high school will likely stimulate continued youth interest. Currently, the EHA utilizes Eagan facilities for practice sessions only. An indoor arena does not exist within the City, and all games are located in other locations within indoor facilities. Community pressure exists to construct an indoor ice facility. Two previous referendums were voted down, which contained, in part, an arena facility. The City Council recently obligated funds for a City arena contingent upon matching amounts to be raised by the community. A match deadline of December 1994 was established by the Council. The parcel immediately south of the City Hall is designated as the arena location. A wide variety of user groups currently utilize the outdoor hockey rinks. Aside from EHA practice, neighborhood residents, broomball leagues, ringette users, church youth groups, and skating lessons utilize the rinks. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN MN 5-R5 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS The primary issues pertaining to existing hockey rink facilities include the following: 1. Capacity —Scheduling problems exist due to the demand and the number of activities occurring within the rinks. A careful balance must be obtained between the demands for EHA hockey practice time versus the needs and desires of other participants. A shortage of available ice is now placing two teams on one ice sheet for practices. 2. Neighborhood Conflict —Outdoor hockey rinks are intended for neighborhood as well as communitywide use. An inherent conflict exists with EHA activity practices occurring in neighborhood situations. EHA activities may displace neighborhood use. Furthermore, perceived issues of noise, traffic, and other operations have been voiced. 3. Geographic Distribution —Current Eagan hockey rinks are distributed through most of the community. However, neighborhoods occurring within the community's center area lack hockey rinks, primarily neighborhoods 15, 21, 22, 25, 28, and 36. Neighborhoods without close hockey rink proximity suggest poor accessibility, especially for youth users that may rely on walking to neighborhood rinks. Access and transportation for EHA practices is not a prevalent issue. Youth players normally receive rides from parents, and users expect practice rinks removed from their residential neighborhoods. Free skating or pleasure skating areas have been unevenly distributed throughout the community. Principal residential areas within the community are generally serviced by a one -mile radius from the 14 existing rinks. The primary exception is the community's central geographic area. Free skating access to neighborhoods 10E, 14, 15, 21, 22, 23, 28 and 36E/W does not exists. This poor service distribution could be rectified by skating facilities serving neighborhoods 15, 21, 22, and 36. • EAGAN ATHLETIC FACILITY NEEDS BASED UPON STANDARDS Eagan facility needs based upon standards are summarized in Table 5.14. Standards are used to generate need for future year populations as a means of establishing surplus or deficit facility levels. Similar to other standards approach, this method should not be employed as the sole analysis tool. Rather, it is to provide one of a number of approaches in obtaining a balanced analysis of facility adequacy. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 5-B8 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS TABLE 5.14 ATHLETIC FACILITY NEEDS BASED ON STANDARDS Facility Baseball (age appropriate) Softball (full size) Tennis Soccer (mid -size or larger) Hockey Standard 1/6,000 pop. 1/2,000 pop. 1/2,000 pop. 1/5,000 pop. 1/3,000 pop. Existing Park Facilities 3 11 28 11 14 Existing School District Facilities 9(1) 1 9 2 Existing Private -- 4 -- Total Community Facilities 13 16 42 13 14 1995 Population Needs (55,500) 10 (+2) 28 (-12) 29 (+13) 11 (+2) 19 (-5) 2000 Population Needs (63,500) 11 (+1) 32 (-16) 32 (+10) 13 (0) 21 (-7) 2005 Population Needs (66,000) 11 (+1) 33 (-17) 33 (+9) 13 (0) 22 (-8) 2010 Population Needs (68,500) 11 (+1) 34 (-18) 34 (+8) 14 (-1) 23 (-9) Source: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. '' These fields may not be full size fields, however, the field size is adequate for the school age group primarily using the facility. ■ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAOAN MN 6•27 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS The inventory of existing facilities takes into consideration both Eagan park's athletic facilities and school district facilities available to Eagan for programming and athletic association use. This is a departure from the 1982 system plan where school district facilities were not considered. The City of Eagan annually relies upon school district facilities to meet the needs of its heavy participant load. Removal of the school district facilities from any analysis would not recognize the ongoing rapport and joint use that the City and school districts have strived for and rely upon. Table 5.14 indicates adequacy of baseball facilities. It is important to recognize, however, that actual participant rates suggest needs beyond those facilities that are existing. The standard does not take into consideration the tremendous participant load on youth facilities that employ baseball fields of Tess than full size including informal ballfields. Full-size softball field needs are apparent from 1995 through 2010 according to the standards analysis. The proposed Lexington-Diffley complex, which includes six full-size fields and one informal softball field, would assist in meeting this deficit. The analysis would also indicate that recreation staff are currently maximizing existing softball field use, thereby moderating costly expenditures for additional fields. Tennis facilities are currently meeting facility standards. This surplus would indicate a current overabundance of courts. These tennis facilities generally provide adequate geographic distribution. However, inadequate facility distribution during playing times exists with few lighted courts available for evening play. Soccer facilities refer to mid -size or larger fields. Eagan currently does not have a full-size regulation soccer field. Mid- size fields are relied upon for EAA use. The standards analysis would indicate general balance of demand to existing facilities. However, the need for full-size soccer facilities is evident. Actual participation rates suggest additional facilities are needed. Hockey rinks, according to the standards, are needed through each of the planning horizons. The 1995 population suggests a deficit of five rinks growing to nine by the year 2010. Actual demand must be measured in terms of participation and scheduling needs. The advent of an indoor arena will pose unknown future demands on the outdoor rinks. This issue will only see resolution by continued monitoring of outdoor rink demand if the indoor facility is developed. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 5.29 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS • BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL FACILITY NEEDS The preceding information suggests the complexities involved in making accurate projections for facility needs and demands. Factors and variables pertaining to baseball and softball facilities are especially difficult to analyze and make accurate projections from. The ability to project future participation and field demands becomes more remote for any planning year beyond three years into the future. For discussion purposes, the following suggestions are made to facility development. Adutt Softball 1995--Existing facilities will be maintained with no additional softball fields brought on-line through this year. However, the City should initiate construction of the Lexington-Diffley Athletic Field Complex as soon as possible in construction year 1994 or 1995 to meet existing demands. This athletic complex would likely become available for use in 1996 or 1997. Prior to this date, the City may initiate thresholds to turn away participants if maximum scheduling is obtained. 2000—By this planning year, Lexington-Diffley will be at full use. In addition, lighting should be considered at the Northview Athletic Field Complex to increase its capacity. 2005—Full lighting of both the Northview and Lexington-Diffley Athletic Fields will be required if participation rates remain status quo or increase and the population continues to increase. Lighting will expand time available for scheduling, thereby providing additional capacity. 2010—Community demographics and development are difficult to project for this planning year. Staff should continue to monitor participation rates and demands in anticipation of growing facility needs. However, existing facilities will likely require rejuvenation and may be amended for uses other than those that they were initially constructed for. Baseball (Youth) 1995—Increasing demand for youth baseball facilities will pose scheduling problems due to the variety of facilities (length of bases and outfields) necessary to meet various age groups. Planning should begin for a multi -field complex to meet growing demand. 2000--A six -field complex should be considered, composed of fields rated for each of the various age categories and BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAGAN, MN 5•R9 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS groupings. This facility would be best developed as a joint -use complex with a school district, such as at the Blackhawk Middle School site. The middle school location would provide central access to the community, while providing facilities for similar age groups for those that attend the school. Land availability is the principal constraint to this solution. 2005/2010—Aging demographics will likely reduce the need for additional youth baseball facilities. Softball (Girls) 1995—Status quo. 1997—Construction of the Lexington-Diffley athletic site will allow youth softball activities at the Rahn Park. If Rahn Park is not available, then an alternative site must be pursued assuming that adequate user demand exists. 2000—Additional softball fields will likely be needed for youth use. These could be obtained through a joint use agreement with a future high school site. Soccer (Youth) 1995—Search for and utilize informal open space within the City for younger age group activities and practice fields. 1997—Utilize proposed soccer facilities at the Lexington-Diffley Athletic Complex. Consider overlay fields or future athletic areas within the Blackhawk Middle School complex. 2005—Develop two additional full-size fields. 2010—Status quo and monitor participation rates. Tennis Tennis court facilities within Eagan have good distribution across the community, however, several neighborhoods have service inadequacies. The proposed standard for tennis (refer to Table 4.3) suggests one court per 2,000 residents with a service radius of 3/4 to 1 1/4 mile. Based upon this standard, future courts could be considered to improve even geographic coverage (refer to Figure 5.7). Table 5.4 suggests tennis court adequacy based upon population levels. However, peak use times exist that demand available courts. Geographic areas underserviced include: Mid -central neighborhoods East -central neighborhoods • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6.30 W E S 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 MILES �I a94) ,$•aa■■■a:aa■ ■aa r I■1 J •1 1 1, FORT '1 SNELLING 4 STATE PARK •. A.� T` BLOOMINGTON •r •. ♦ • ♦. • ■ ■ ■ a ,a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a • • • • Edn G 1 ■ • !EV' a !I•'J • • HILLS a CEDAR _ POND S7ver Bell Rd AVEN A'A'.Tr. PATH PERIOO1 o Carnelian ELIAN cr tr LAND if CINNAMON P Li um RAHN __; • ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ti ■ a m ■ ■ a a O HIGHVIEW:- a. COUNTRY , HOME ..� PILOT- KNOBi Iri......... 0 DijaUW aLACKHNNK m 1. a•■■■■11-a-■f•••i-rtor'als-aaa 14-aor error ■au•■K■rra■•■rr a APPLE VALLEY ROSEMOLINT MENDOTA HEIGHTS o, m LEXINGTON N Lone Oafs Rd. Q ■••■■■■■■■■■a■•■■■a■ D 1 ■ �\\ - O J ■ ) ■ • • • • ■ ■ ■ ,yAnkte. Roadie Rd c) WESCOTT COMMONS MUELLER FARM —4 Wescott Rd WAN WALK e WESCOTT STATION o, J ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ • ■ • a ANDERING •' ALK ■ ■ ■ ■ a2- • cik CAPTAIM,� DODD r-- :.■ .0 • g;' • a )LEXINGT • r Lb+nngtoo r' RcvH T -� H •. ■ • a ■ • • • • ■ • • ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■■•■•■■■• 0 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS FIGURE 5-1 TENNIS DISTIRBUTION EXISTING TENNIS COURT HIGH SCHOOL a MIDDLE SCHOOL ECEI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CIVIC COMPLEX PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 5 - 31 (14941 =■■a■■■■■■■■■■r■ ■■a■ • S 4 N FORT ,a' SNELLING / a IMUSI At STATE i Lone Oak Rd.• ■ 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 MILES PARK E� �� ■ H E a BLOOMINGTON ± E C7 ■ kel L 1C; LJ • = • l7 �� V' BURR • �♦ .Z/ Q �-' OAKS • W ■ Z ♦ ✓ ■ 1.14 _ .._.. Yankee •Doodle Rd,-..__ ■ / © ■ o WESCOTT ■ C 5O'LEARY -- COMMONS IN l'I UNAMED ,p HIL• '1■■■:■■aasrar■ I HIOHVIEWri L couNTRV I � \/HOME MENDOTA HEIGHTS ■ b :...� ■ - r arm • ,♦ Q A. ■ o ` S f ■ LEXINGTON ■ e WESCOTT STATION ■ ■sR )� _ F�SN -' MUELLER _ ■ ■ V_.( ,FARM • ■CO ■ le • 7- ; Silver Bell Rd. 0 ... ...... ' a Wescott Rd _, ■� o -- 1� L �IYANDERING■ BLACKHMNK' BARRARA / i,-WA1K ■ pTO ". •.,2..N/EN?G �i CURRY r`�- ■ /11:1 Q,�e _7r�-. PERIDO — __ J WANAERII G ORIOLE RI - � ":■ WINDC S i ' i ■ G r PATH m � ,.. _ a WALK Pf ����� -' ■ • G Nathvicw Park Rd / ■ V■ Deenwood Dr �a .■ ■ x f CAPT ■ ■ Carnelian IWIRNELUW PATCH ` OODD t� ■ NORTHVl�M 1 v ■�� �PATRI�K ■ ._ ys CEDAR EAGAN — m �w : - ,. BOND Th V ■ u Pitney Rd �/ • J/`�� a _ l: HEINE � ! LE%INGT N Cep/ ■ • ce c. !^ POND CA*LSON D1FFLEY O ■ • REs%re f.LSE r ,__i 41EADOWLAND 45. � a EVERGREEN r'� ■ a3 e ITu ��I TRAPy ,' ■ ■---J - _ _ --_.0 Wilderness Run Rd. c s. HILL HILL j FARM' ■ O' CINNAMON ���� G� t afFeRd 7HOMAS �� _— _..- j ■ ____ LAKE �VI )., L11KE5tDE ■ O ■ 1) ��,, oQ �i �', CLEARWATER C) ..SOUTH ■ u ■ _Cliff Rd. .. .OAKS • c- C� ...C1) ■ 1 ■ U ,ED H N �7 H ■ • R�'�'�.' F • LEHANON, • / GEORGE IIILLS `.3 c i j ■ •• • KETTLE OHMANN REGIONAL S S • ,J PARK o ■ u ) O J l vl�s L� ECU (� �_ CJ ■ • v ■ • • p■ ■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■raa■■■■f:■■r■■■t'■■■■■■■r■r■■■■>r\■r■■a1�r■■rra■■r■r■■■■r■■r■■■ ■a■■■ APPLE VALLEY ROSEMOUNT a C 5 NEED AND DEMANDS FIGURE 5-2 SKATING FACILITY DISTRIBUTION EXISTING HOCKEY RINK EXISTING PLEASURE SKATING RINK HIGH SCHOOL a MIDDLE SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL i CIVIC COMPLEX PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 6 - 33 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS • South-east neighborhoods Tennis courts could be considered at Blackhawk Middle School (Service Area 21) and a new southeast elementary school (Service Area 36E) to meet these service deficiencies and maximize shared use opportunities. Lighting of select courts should also be considered to lengthen popular evening playing times and provide additional capacity. Ice Hockey and Pleasure Skating Distribution of ice hockey rinks and pleasure skating areas is shown on Figure 5.15. Proposed standards suggest ice hockey rinks should service a 1- to 2-mile service area and a population of 3,000 residents. Pleasure skating rinks (free skating) should service a 3/4 to 1 1/4 mile radius and one rink per 5,000 residents. Service area voids currently exist, according to Figure 5.21 within Eagan's central and developing southeast area neighborhoods. Development of a hockey rink and pleasure skating rink in both Service Areas 15 and 36E would improve these area's access to winter skating. Eagan maintains current records on both hockey and pleasure skating rink use. These records are effective tools in gauging the need for operating a rink and justifying the cost involved. Staff and the Advisory Commission should annually review the need for existing rinks and actively pursue their closure if sufficient use does not exist. Rink closure need not be permanent; however, scrutiny is appropriate to moderate real operating costs. Park Planning Districts Park Planning and development within Eagan has previously been approached on a district basis. The population projections were broken down into six planning districts and the corresponding neighborhood park service areas. This breakdown illustrates where the City's population concentrations are located and allows for an assessment of park demand in areas experiencing the greatest development pressure. Eagan's Initial Development Guide divided the City into park service areas. The 1983 Park Plan has established six planning districts that overlay the neighborhood park service areas. As the City has developed, incentive to use the park planning districts as a population and demographic analysis tool has begun to diminish. However, the park planning districts remain as an effective tool to analyze the geographic distribution of elements such as tennis, hockey, pleasure skating, and special use facilities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6-3 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS • NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ANALYSIS Eagan's Park System Plan, prepared in 1982, divided the community into six planning districts as a means of assessing park demand based upon development pressure and population concentrations. Park planning further subdivided the community into 34 neighborhood park service areas to guide the acquisition and development of neighborhood parks and recreation facilities. Dividing the community into planning districts and park service areas was an effective means in 1982 to focus on impending neighborhood park development and planned residential patterns. Since that time, the City has relied upon the service areas as an objective approach to analyzing and developing neighborhood parks. By design, the neighborhood park has become the fundamental building block of Eagan's park system. As of 1994, a limited number of neighborhood service areas are yet unresolved or fall short in terms of facilities available to local residents. Neighborhoods in which accessible park facilities are not provided at this time fit into one or more of a number of categories as illustrated on Figure 5.1. These include: 1. Service areas designated for residential purposes which are not fully developed and where population densities currently do not merit neighborhood park construction.figure 5.1 2. Service areas where unresolved land development variables exist within the service areas that affect land use types or residential densities and number of units. 3. Service areas where land is guided for commercial or industrial purposes and poses minimal neighborhood park requirements. Community parks, trails, and private sector open space are intended to meet commerciaVindustrial worker needs. 4. Service areas where the neighborhood may be fully developed but residential development patterns or lot sizes preclude neighborhood park development, or adequate demand does not exist within the neighborhood because park needs are more efficiently met by another neighborhood park of dose proximity. Five neighborhood park service areas exist in which more detailed analysis is appropriate. These neighborhoods include 15, 18, 21, 22, and 36E. A summary of each of these service areas including their location, background, variables, and planning alternatives follow. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 5.38 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS FIGURE 5-3 PARK SERVICE AREA ANALYSIS LEGEND ••• • • • • • 0 a 411 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COUNTY OR STATE PARK 1/2 MILE RADIUS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY PARKS 3/4 MILE RADIUS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY PARKS DENOTES AREAS NOT CURRENTLY SERVED BY A NEIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY PARK HIGH SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CIVIC COMPLEX PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 5 - 37 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Neighborhood Park Service Area 18 LOCATION/CONTEXT Area 18 is bounded by Trunk Highway (TH) 13, TH 77, railroad tracks, and the Cedar Industrial Park (refer to Figure 5.2). Adjacent land uses are principally industrial and commercial with the exception of the Minnesota Valley floodplain, an area under management by the Minnesota DNR and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Area 18 is zoned both single-family and multifamily, however, it is guided for industrial use. The adjacent areas are guided and zoned for industrial uses. The adjacent Minnesota River Valley offers abundant open space. A state trail stretching from Fort Snelling to LeSueur is planned for both sides of the river for development within the next five-year period. City trail planning includes a trail Zink passing through Area 18 connecting the City with the Minnesota Valley trails. Currently, a sidewalk trail exists along the south side of Silver Bell trail. The closest neighborhood park to Area 18 is Woodhaven Park, located approximately three-quarters of a mile south of the service area. TH 13 separates Area 18 from Woodhaven Park, effectively limiting children's access to the park and limiting family use. BACKGROUND Three multifamily buildings, each containing 50 units, exist within Area 18. In addition, 18 single-family homes exist. The current subdivision layout would accommodate three additional multi- family buildings of 50 units each. Through large lot subdivision, 20 additional single-family units could be developed. The ultimate residential population and character of this neighbor- hood will be formulated in part based upon public policy decisions and the desires of existing parcel owners to subdivide their properties. SERVICE AREA VARIABLES Area 18 is affected by a number of issues or variables that will ultimately serve as criteria for park development in the area's park facility needs: 1. The ultimate land use, residential versus industrial, and the density of residential ultimately developed is unclear at this time. Residential population at build -out could double today's census through both multifamily and single-family construction. However, alternatively, City policy may re - guide area property, both existing and undeveloped, for BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 5.39 " 5 N E E D S N D D EM NDS , • • • • • re - / ! 4 . . " . _ . . • .• ' " • • ! 1.• : e: .• .• .nrlift• I •• : .s• i . . : 4. 7.2. *1•• , irk'rt "P20 POSEY TRAIL EADJINTERPRET1VE ENTER „•' ,•' I I'm / ...0. pt"......" 4 1/4, e „gtsi. : tI I ' d r 0 0 „ • • . . . • . /, f J - „ o•. • •.• • ‘. % .' .., ...,. , .•:tA• .:O.._• .I .,....•,... .,, ,..",r.11• 4'• •:• -:'4. /i• l7-:",. -• .-f.:f.•.. .i .i r...: _,. , I%1 •... --J-••....IJ N P 1a //:b'Aj; 1 0//1r 7,..41..,„_ ,.. 44 .., ',.*:" , : 71 . .. • r:::, : f. -".... ..E• i : " # • ip • , • . .. .. . ! v . ', t1: .:" 1• , , .., .. . .. . _ . . , . . . . . ,. m14l oie••••. .0orm i m•••a11s .1M •1111 01mO1M••i. .. 1ili1•••1..1i.1'M. . .,t. .I.6 .rM .•m .i .M. Im ..OI .I•.P. . . .Bi1 t 0.•• 1.1 •1 ...0 .•.. ! .• .0 _...40 .P• .. l• •._i .N.—.. -. .. .... ..A . .e. .i.T,_..E ..' • OM •..'.•..01 •-•• —,• .. . . . ° . 0 .1 : . -. , - 40. .,- . ' • - `- ;,' ' t . - - .. ,: ; ..•; 1.1 1:. 41 . 4. .4 - ,-:: ". ;- _..:7 _ g.. ''' ..:. . r- . "4 T ' - : - - " 4 . , , ,, _ / - , .k . 7 . 1 ;' \ ' % " A — • \ '- -\ \ 7- 1 SERVICE AREA 18 LEGEND r , I II •I MV184.4%.11 A , • , SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY NEIGHBORHOOD PARK VACANT PUBLIC WORKS PARCEL PRIVATE UNDEVELOPED PARCEL •.- 4 mET.11Eitri ore,:re • fIq • t ers••••n••• .. 44•Arantir-r,.. I •• . ... . ... A • ; : •-•tec : rr-• .. , . . • • 4 4 • • $1,44 171i1V154 . " o 500 1 OCO 2000 3000 FEET EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL EXISTING SIDEWALK TRAIL EXISTING ON ROAD TRAIL PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL PROPOSED STATE TRAIL • FIGURE 5-4 MARTON ABM -IMAM ASILOCIATIM, INC. PAflK SYSTEM PLAN CAGAN. NIN 8-40 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS industrial purposes, effectively diminishing residential park demand. 2. Local and state trails may improve the neighborhood's access to open space and neighborhood parks through trails and safe roadway crossings. Planned regional trails within the Minnesota River Valley would provide the neighborhood with open space access. Furthermore, local city trails could enhance trail connections through the neighborhood and improve crossings of TH 13 to Woodhaven Park. These considerations may improve the neighborhood's current access to neighborhood facilities, however, current industrial land uses effectively provide barriers to the development of convenient neighborhood park facilities within Area 18. 3. The Tesseract School is located within the service area. School administrators are currently not interested in joint site facility use. However, their interest should be pursued in the future. 4. Eagan Public Works owns a vacant parcel west of Nicols Road that could potentially serve neighborhood needs. ALTERNATIVES A number of alternative scenarios should be considered as Area 18 moves toward a build -out condition: 1. Maximum Residential Development —Approximately 300 apartment units and up to 38 single-family residences could occur with maximum residential development. This development would likely include both traditional and single - parent families. If this situation results, the City could work with the multi- family developer to obtain land and build a neighborhood commons that meets the service area's active recreation needs. Neighborhood commons development could be a condition of multifamily development and may employ parcels currently vacant or underutilized such as those eligible for subdivision. Additional multifamily development beyond existing levels should not be considered without neighborhood commons development. Resulting recreational facilities could be constructed by the multifamily developer for maintenance by the City of Eagan. The need for a neighborhood park could be presented if substantial numbers of children would reside in the multifamily complex or if the neighborhood desired field BART ON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 6.41 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS activities or winter activities that could not be met by other adjacent parks due to roadway barriers. 2. Status Quo, Retention of Existing Residential —This scenario assumes limited additional single-family from limited subdivision activity. However, additional multifamily would not occur. The resulting population would be generated from the existing 150 multifamily units and up to 38 single- family residences. Moderate population increases within Area 18 would still pose unmet neighborhood demand for active park spaces. This demand can be met in one or more of the following alternatives: A. Construction of future Eagan trails should be done in a manner to emphasize safe crossings of TH 13 at Silver Bell Road. This action would likely involve signal timing, safety signing, and trail alignment. B. Eagan is currently planning a trailhead/interpretive site adjacent Nicols Road as a part of the regional trail and local trail connection. The facility may provide further recreational facilities of neighborhood benefit if play apparatus, programmable open space, and picnic facilities are included. This site would be accessible to Area 18 by the local trail connection. C. Temporary facilities may be considered within open space currently void of development including a vacant public works parcel. The City may choose to purchase parcels amounting to two to five acres for a temporary neighborhood commons use. These parcels may ultimately revert for private sector development pending land use decisions and resulting density. 3. Increased Industrial Development —City policy may ultimately stimulate additional industrial development consistent with land use adjacent Area 18. This scenario suggests reduction in residential units and resulting recreational demand. Interim park facilities could employ recommendations 2.A. through 2.C., enumerated above, prior to removal of residential land uses. Reduction or elimination of residential units would ultimately limit recreational needs and the corresponding facility demand. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 8.42 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Neighborhood Park Service Area 15 LOCATION/CONTEXT Area 15 is bordered by Pilot Knob Road, Yankee Doodle Road, Wescott Road, and Lexington Avenue (refer to Figure 5.3). A large commercial area abuts the neighborhood's northern boundary. City hall and the County library facility occur in close proximity, abutting Area 15's southwest corner. Glacier Hills Elementary School also lies south. Bituminous or sidewalk trails currently exist on both sides of Lexington, Pilot Knob Road, and Wescott Road. O'Leary Park is situated in the study area's northeast corner with an internaUexternal trail system accessing abutting residential parcels. Fish Lake Park is in the southwest corner. BACKGROUND Development within Area 15 is concentrated within the southwest, central, and northeast corners. The southeast corner abutting Lexington and Wescott Road is undeveloped. Current zoning is quite diverse, ranging from planned development to single- and multifamily residential. Prominent parcels yet undeveloped are guided for single-family land use. Two parks within Area 15 provide neighborhood open space and recreation facilities. O'Leary Park, located in the northeast quadrant, is accessible to adjacent multifamily and single-family development. Similarly, Fish Lake Park, lying adjacent to Fish Lake, provides convenient access for adjacent single-family and low density multifamily. The principal issues associated with Area 15 pertain to uniform access for the various residential areas, increased recreation programs for Area 15 children including those within multifamily developments, and increased winter activity facilities such as hockey and skating. Area 15's diverse residential developments suggest that a wide variety of recreation demands exist ranging from single adults to single -parent families to more traditional families. SERVICE AREA VARIABLES The majority of remaining undeveloped parcels are guided for single-family residential use. Future development could totally encircle Hurley Lake and other smaller water basins. This is rolling terrain with substantial tree cover. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•43 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Ii ,,i. ;•,•-•-e•. ;••giq...rs.r, r , I f YANKEE DOODLE RD. € P-A•7• ,.,,_,....‘,..,...„.,„,,,,..„„........lim.—....4,1 ..........limi lot— ..."".........--:tvarlisoriam r-"ania"-imanow..110.:71.... II__ ..„........................... „. , ,a6..„...„ WWWWW . . -10•4141-• a lee.' r • •J0 .' '. • i 't 1 '.. 'It. ii ... -:: • i..i• 't . . r I .. i • i - Tug —i, . i r "-rt. .. r' ' :11 ost.PAMIL . ‘. HWY 35E ....• ,..• • • . ---, • • •• fil: • ,. . . .• • ;. .... % , ii.....,...1 r ---.'.9...-1"........s1 'tt 1. ▪ II — -L.: - ....4. e .1. • a 3 • • ,.C. . . \ : _.4'../. ideellinit;1 .1,5 I t.' i NI -,111,...•••Lui min NM =WOW 41.4.,OhNIEV.4!!..• . •,.•-•1[.... iL....::::-.. 1 ....... ::------- .r•-•., .11,-..r bo 1 o' - .1 • T 4 . • : Yr: e :I N.,:°.."--7 .Ft• .e EC • ----- ...c• 26 i... ...4......:- er C .:, Z • . II f F " W. r-1171,41::•• ' - ,• 0•••••••-.01''''•-•- . ...z.-4 g 11 1. Milli 7. M W.6311 • ‘-.4: . ril•-•*-1”..; I ; ,.... .....P.,TO .. !••?•111•1 • . • • 1 in 0 •'": : int: riN e..-1.: r •... 't . - rI' ' 4 ...,4. e • • t 4,••^•'. 011 4.-•","..: • ..ii il:":1e1::": %'" ''1 ••:,. -••• 0 N •::. ::., ul.nt•C .." ."..,* 0 , I i ...p • ......11 • j ....• ••• , ;..., . 1.,..7..! :4... , ,. ... .'. ••• Pi r , L r '''''' 1 1" ' " .... s. -4' • •41111n %AA a N-00. R. • !IAA •A.•.• •AAAAA -. • .. • • . i . 1 ▪ , Ducsavodilbt,................. . : .„:,.....--"ml 41`,.• t.. ,, ., ,„__. ............L.....4.11.14.111r.,. 0 .. .....at.......—. :- .' Se r• - • r-.4--- : --;••••:- r,..:.-rr':. i br: " ' ;-, : , , rg, ; i; ----7 .. " WK... IN ..•• I •• CRESTIiIDGE LA. —:_.h.,..—.7..7-... ,., . 714:•1 . ilni"- ,7"7 .1 ... YE —•1`':•—• 1"---;''' '17---:\ ---)-(.- 1(e' ..• _ .6 t: i„„,„7.',..1-14.:-.. • .. --„, . „-- • . . -. 1....: .......„,„4..., 1,....i.: 1...,.., „,----,47 ,,,,....3...i,.. . , i sic :,...•., -..t.,. ,k`-: - 1 . ,.. .... ,.., :. , ...,z.„1 L,..7........., ,,,, ...sa.„. 4.,. ....... ... ...„..27,,,,,, ...• ..-:...,.....:-.:7 T, j-....- •.. . ... . t..• -0, - .hor, • • ik--.n• ._.17434-1: : A.--- ,-,-- %N. "*:••---T 1.-- .., -, -a- . . 23,,L. . .., "rt -1""--:. : "..... ' 4 7 / 1 • ••• .,...matej iv F. • ,,••• 17.145-4::„ APO 1. • ••71,:-14:1 11,1.r . qr.. ... „Water .; rr::H-7.4f ...... • um me WESCOTT RD. CIVIC COMPLEX . : .. ... ;TR: SERVICE AREA 15 LEGEND pusUc- 4 .... :-..*e*•••lum,•1 ..... ' • ' mom No SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONSERVANCY PARK 770, PROPOSED UNEAR PARK OR COMMONS ifigirliFlin t.,itijit e"1: mee• z.iftPli Al LS -7 • • k , • t 41t...,t•go.• • • • • ...... • • • II.' ion ama ...los. • • GLACIER HILLS ELEMENTARY 0 500 1000 2000 3000 FEET 1 EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL EXISTING SIDEWALK TRAIL PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL PROPOSED OFF ROAD TRAIL • • •-. • • . . ... : . .r.te FIGURE 5 - 5 MARTON ASCJI4FAAN ASSC)CIATES, PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 LAOAN, MN 15-44 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS ALTERNATIVES Two distinct park alternatives exist for Area 15. Each provides contrasting virtues based upon land use development patterns and the park's contribution to the community's overall system. 1. Dispersed Facilities —Single-family development in the Hurley Lake area will have limited access to O'Leary and Fish Lake Park unless a commitment to additional neighbor- hood trails is made. This scenario assumes the develop- ment of a neighborhood common adjacent Hurley Lake for uniform access from the adjacent currently undeveloped residential neighborhood. The common would complement other nearby park facilities, O'Leary and Fish Lake. Development of a free-standing neighborhood common or linear park could be an effective manner of meeting the Hurley Lake neighborhood needs. However, without connective trail linkages with other nearby park parcels, the alternative fragments park acreage. Furthermore, a mini - park may not be the most effective means to preserving Hurley Lake frontage and the community resource it represents. 2. Interconnecting Park Parcels —This scenario assumes Area 15 has significance for the entire community. Its rolling terrain, water basins, and tree cover are natural resource assets that could be interconnected with other existing and future park parcels located in other park service such as 10E, 21, 22, and 27. As Area 15 development continues, linear park linkages and trails should be preserved connecting Fish Lake Park and O'Leary Park with the Hurley Lake area. The linear park should be aligned adjacent an edge of Hurley Lake and promote connections to public parcels farther south, such as Patrick Eagan Park and the Eagan Municipal Center. Linear park development has a number of important strengths: A. Existing neighborhood park facilities are inter- connected, thereby increasing residential accessibility and maximizing these parks' available facilities. B. Existing natural resources, including water basins, can be capitalized upon and made accessible to the community for a broader recreation experience. C. Preservation of important natural resources including water basin edges and vegetation can result, improving their value for the community. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 8.4a 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS D. Linear parks could provide improved access to other community facilities including the civic center complex, county library, and Glacier Hills Elementary. Additional winter activities can be provided in a number of ways. An outdoor hockey rink could be considered at an upper area parcel in Area 15 or within Service Area 22. Pleasure skating could occur at a neighborhood commons or a park parcel in Service Area 22 such as the civic arena (outside). Neighborhood Park Service Area 22 LOCATION/CONTEXT Pilot Knob Road, Wescott Road, Diffley Road, and Lexington Avenue border Area 22 (Figure 5.4). The planning area includes Eagan's municipal center, Glacier Hills Elementary School, and the Dakota County library branch. Currently, Berry Patch Park is the single designated park, a conservancy area. Parcels designated for park purposes, yet undeveloped, include Patrick Eagan Park and two conservancy areas. Caponi Art Park, which is currently privately owned, exists on the southern edge of Area 22. Bituminous or sidewalk trails have been developed on both sides of Wescott Road, Diffley Road, Pilot Knob Road and Lexington Avenue. A sidewalk trail is aligned along the west side of Denmark Avenue and along Deerwood Drive. Current parcel zoning is primarily single-family with small multifamily or neighborhood business designations. However, a substantial amount of agriculturally zoned open space exists for future development. These parcels are guided for single-family residential development. SERVICE AREA VARIABLES The principal variables affecting neighborhood park facilities within Area 22 pertain more to park development rather than private parcel development and use. Area 22 has tremendous opportunity for interlinking of existing and future park parcels of significance to the entire community. Patrick Eagan Park could be considered the park system's "diamond in the rough," and its development philosophy will significantly contribute to meeting Area 22's residential recreation demands. Principal variables include opportunities for trails to interlink park parcels, trail access from residential areas into park parcels, and the type of recreational facilities posed for Patrick Eagan Park. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 5.4a num um low um wis".:4 WESCOTT RD. 'CIVIC' •• • _ COMPLEX POTENTIAL CIVIC ARENA mI I PUBLJC LIBRARY Pftgvy4QP.* SERVICE AREA 22 LEGEND 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS ✓ BERRY PATCH PARK .........Vir. GLACIER HILLS ELEMENTARY • -IIF 1111=1II4 311E IIII _IIII pATRICK EAGMM'II E. II 'III -.1111EIIII=II pARK IIII= 11 1111E 1111E 1111EIIIiE1111 IIII=1 •��11= =IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=1111=III!= rLa_T•114•1" l=1111=1111--1111ij II-1111E1111=IIII=II!I=1111 • 1111EWIzfill =1111=1111 11=.im`--IIII-IIII=1111=1111 ▪ 11=1111=1111=1111=1111a -nn=—I=11ll-IIII=11i1=1111 III!— 1l1111E.111111111=IIII=III!s111'e 1111E1111-1111 41,L1=1111-1111-IIII �1111=III=IIII=IIII=11I1 ajIll=IIII=IIII: 1111=IIII=1111E1111-IIIlalll=IIII=III I 1111= III -a1111a1111=1111=11�=111IEIIII= IIII-IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII-IIL 1111=III IIII= II1E1111E1111E111117F:1111,-_-1111=1111 IIII—IIII—IIII—IIII-1111111=1111=III IIII=III=IIII=1111 lItEIIII-11h=III!: CAPON! ART PARK IO NORTHVIEW PARK ▪ DIFFLEYRD. 111 -11 -111E- 1111E1111E111 -III E1 =111!=.11 =11 =11b=1'i=IIII=IIII= li = ^111 =lip.=111E-1111—IIII=IIIIIII-- JIl 111'a III! = LEXINGTbN/uTFFLEY c III! = I - II!, : PARK 0 500 1000 2000 3000 FEET SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING SIDEWALK TRAIL CONSERVANCY PARK Nom PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL Lill - ill UNDEVELOPED PARK PROPOSED OFF ROAD TRAIL FIGURE 5 — 6 •ARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 5-47 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS ALTERNATIVES Park parcels in Area 22 could be arranged in any number of configurations to meet neighborhood park needs. Two basic concept types merit further analysis: centralized and decentralized. 1. Centralized —Existing park parcels within Area 22 have neighborhood use limitation due to their classification, i.e., Berry Patch Park —conservancy, linear park character, or natural resource implications. A new single neighborhood park could be acquired northwest of Patrick Eagan Park and situated central to the entire service area. This parcel would be over and above existing parkland and serve neighborhood functions. Park access would occur through existing and proposed trails. Centralized neighborhood park facilities would balance access with location. Shared use of existing facilities and park parcels would not exist, although equal neighborhood balance would result. 2. Decentralized -An alternate approach would employ two neighborhood facilities, each serving one-half of the service area. The northern one-half could be served by a joint use facility abutting Glacier Hills Elementary School, which currently offers play apparatus and open space for informal games. Additional parkland would be required with the resulting facility benefiting both the school and neighborhood residents. The southern area could be served by neighborhood facilities developed within Patrick Eagan Park. Issues regarding neighborhood access and sensitivity to the resource base would be confronted. Multiple recreation functions within Patrick Eagan Park could maximize the parcel's park use efficiency. Both alternatives allow Patrick Eagan to function as a community park. However, the alternatives differ in terms of existing parcel efficiency and neighborhood accessibility. Service Area 22 should serve as a hub for the City's trail system, its nature interpretive functions, and other municipal functions (municipal center, school, library, and civic arena). Existing and future park parcels within Area 22 should be interconnected to maximize community access and recreation opportunities. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 5-4B • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Neighborhood Park Service Area 21 LOCATION/CONTEXT Service Area 21 is bounded by Interstate 35E, Pilot Knob Road, and Diffley Road. Trails occur on both sides of Diffley Road, Pilot Knob Road, and Deerwood (refer to Figure 5.5). Area 21 is currently void of any park parcels. Deerwood Elementary and Blackhawk Middle School (under construction) provide school - related outdoor athletic facilities that will have neighborhood benefit. Edge roadways segregate Area 21 from other park areas. Development within the service area has been concentrated north of Deerwood Drive and within the quadrant abutting Diffley and Pilot Knob Roads. These parcels are primarily single-family. Undeveloped areas central and west are currently zoned agricultural with the exception of a small roadside business element. The community's land use designation is mixed residential (zero to six units per acre). BACKGROUND Upon completion of Black Hawk Middle School, outdoor recreation facilities will include one softball field, two baseball fields, one football field, two overlay soccer fields, and four tennis courts. These facilities may be inadequate for the proposed student population of 1,600 to 1,800. Interior recreation facilities will include a swimming pool and gymnasium. Deerwood Elementary School has a playground and two ballfields which can accommodate an overlay soccer facility. SERVICE AREA VARIABLES Area 21 is affected by a wide variety of variables that will contribute to its ultimate build -out and response to neighborhood park recreation demand. Future development density and land use type is yet to be determined. Although the remaining property is guided for residential density at six units per acre, a commerciaVresidential land use mix may yet result. Previous commercial development proposals for the southwest corner of the area were rejected. Issues pertaining to these parcels are the subject of current legal action. Roadway alignments will contribute to the final development configuration. City staff have examined three alternative routes for Thomas Lake Road, which in turn have implications for the alignment of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Resulting parcel configurations will contribute to development layout and its access to neighborhood open space and potential recreation BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAG AI11, MN 5.49 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS SERVICE AREA 21 LEGEND mi SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL EXISTING SIDEWALK TRAIL PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL POSSIBLE THOMAS LAKE ROAD ALIGNMENTS 0 500 1000 nzw 3000 FEET a:. j:,.� ft:`,:id%'•!Sit:•...':•..y.�..�y.2��.•�w[:;...j:i:. .;:.:%;•.•j',.C,:;•.•r :■■■rrrr■■ ••rarr■rr■rrrri BLACKHAWK PARK S.F. FIRE ; ADMINISTRATI • BUILDING �'ry •• • ' rr *se. . I I rr <} II PROBABLE I I WATER TOWER 1 I • SITE ,4 1i'e'I 1 I <„,/ /' 1 11 ijliil ! BLACK HAWK AND DEERWOOD SCHOOLS . M a MI M —_-s� HEINE PO bra PARK 7 i FISH I LAKE PARK CIVIC COMPLEX 16 • cc m O z Y O 1 1 1 1 1 1 • FIGURE 5 - 7 ■ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6.60 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS facilities. Deerwood Drive is a barrier for children residing in the service area's northern tier. The City is also examining a location for a future water tower likely to be sited east of Interstate 35E and south of Deerwood Drive. Demand for school athletic facilities and the district's response will contribute to an appropriate neighborhood park response. The need for school district facilities by students is expected to be beyond those facilities planned by the school district which can be accommodated on -site. This coincides with increasing youth facility needs within the community primarily for varying sized baseball fields, softball fields, and soccer facilities. Expanded athletic facility development through a municipaV school district joint use agreement would be beneficial to both parties. However, the athletic facilities will not fully meet the area's neighborhood park requirements for facilities such as trails, play apparatus, and picnicking. ALTERNATIVES A variety of park planning alternatives should be considered in meeting Area 21's neighborhood park facilities: 1. Commercial Development —If commercial development exists within the current vacant southwest portion of Area 21, the number of residential units would stay status quo and demand for neighborhood facilities would be moderate. Neighborhood recreational facilities would principally be met through the use of elementary and middle school open space. Additional City investment would likely be limited to a small parcel adjacent the school facilities and Thomas Lake Road, principally used for picnic and nonathletic facilities. The park would have a neighborhood common designation. 2. Mixed Commercial/Residential--This development within the southwest area would increase residential demand. Com- mercial land use would likely be concentrated adjacent to 35E and Diffley frontages. As a result, residential uses would front school properties and Deerwood edges. Neighborhood park demand would be best met by additional City parkland adjacent to the school. 3. Full Residential Development —The City desires the remaining undeveloped parcels to be residential at a density of six units per acre or Tess. Resulting demand for neighborhood park facilities would require additional acreage. This could be met in one of two ways. First, the City could develop a neighborhood common adjacent the school complex. This would be augmented by additional BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 6.61 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS outdoor facilities in a private sector commons park within a multifamily residential project. An alternative means would be to construct a neighborhood park facility, of moderate size, adjacent to the school complex. The resulting public park or school athletic field area would be of adequate size to meet both neighborhood and school activity demands. 4. Fire Administration Building Site —Single- and multifamily development within the northern arm of Park District 21 may pose local area park access problems. A neighbor- hood common facility or temporary recreation use of the fire administration parcel would help alleviate the issue. Long- term use of the parcel is not known at this time. As previously described, the variables affecting Service Area 21 are diverse and complex. Timing is important as the develop- ment parcels are likely to be absorbed on an incremental basis. Unfortunately, current litigation between the City and private parties will pose timing difficulties in resolving development configuration and resulting park facilities. Clustering public open space, school athletic fields, and municipal neighborhood or neighborhood common space together best serves the area's residential uses. Trail linkages through this central location must be considered as development takes place. City staff and school district personnel should work cooperatively to provide complementary facilities and maintenance responses. Neighborhood Park Service Area 36E LOCATION/CONTEXT Area 36E is in the far southeast corner of Eagan bordered by Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, and TH 3 (refer to Figure 5.6). The parcel is isolated from other Eagan neighborhoods by its location and roadway barrier. Public parkland does not currently exist, and trails have not been constructed. Land use within Area 36E is mixed. New single-family subdivisions are being developed in the northern portion of the area. Light industrial parcels are zoned within portions of the southern area, however, the entire service area is guided for single-family residential development. Existing industrial land uses are likely to remain in -place until such time that single- family is viable from an economic standpoint. BACKGROUND Neighborhood park demand within this area exists primarily due to the edge constraints and difficult accessibility. The Cities of • • BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PI -AM EAGAN. MN 5.32 F.. e. •r-RE:7- e..••••••. Ent NMI !MIMF WINO MS al/. NEB SERVICE AREA 36E LEGEND m• SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONSERVANCY PARK PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE PARK LOCATIONS 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS .: 44 in! r•••••• Aft-ft-ftetifit.1741L;aft... 'T-7:7:144:74414 "CrSOintiOAXS PAPX •=11 ; .. 1 1 f: .......... 1 t • .e • irk., • ./ ••m• 4-".`rit •. : ..„. • TH 3 .. . ' 11411 7111•11-'1111iH::!::11111111- . ............ . . ... ......... . . ROSEMOUNT-. 0 SOO ICCO 2000 3 FEET REGIONAL PARK 41) • • • • PROPOSED REGIONAL TRAIL •-• PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL FIGURE 5 - 8 •ARTON ASCHNLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN: EAGAN, MN 553 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS Inver Grove Heights and Rosemount have not indicated an opportunity for shared use of future park development. Neighborhood access from 36E to other Eagan facilities is limited by TH 3. The neighborhood's access limitations and single-family character reaffirm the need for neighborhood park facilities. SERVICE AREA VARIABLES Three principal variables exist for this service area, the extent of residential development, its timing, and potential construction of a School District 196 elementary school. Area 36E will likely mature as single-family residential with a density of three units or Tess per acre. Existing light industrial uses would be displaced by redevelopment. Residential development will incrementally occur with total build -out likely by the year 2005 to 2010, assuming a displacement of Tight industrial properties. ALTERNATIVES Few form alternatives exist for Area 36E. Residential demand will ultimately require a full neighborhood park of moderate size. Parcel acquisition should occur as soon as possible to preserve a usable, contiguous piece. Actual development might occur on an incremental basis consistent with the amount of residential development actually in place. Logical trail linkages into the park from adjacent residential parcels should be provided for during the subdivision process such that neighborhood facilities can be made as accessible as possible for the entire service area. These linkages should include a trail crossing of TH 3 providing access to Lebanon Hills and the remainder of Eagan. Construction of an elementary school would reduce the service area's ultimate resident population and pose joint use opportunities. If the school is pursued, Eagan staff should carefully analyze the availability of adjacent parcels for development of complementary neighborhood park facilities. Two logical location alternatives exist within Area 36E for neighborhood park development. the majority of the undeveloped land is void of vegetation, terrain with visual character, or other park natural resource character. One opportunity parcel is centrally located with a single wetland and a small grove of trees. This location would provide convenient access to existing residential and ultimately afford central trail access. A second alternative is situated south central adjacent existing Tight industrial. This site could capitalize upon several wetland areas and existing plantation trees. Although the southern site may ultimately be preferred, near term residential uses would not be conveniently accessed. • • e BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 5-54 • • • 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS • SUMMARY This chapter provides a multifaceted needs and demands analysis taking into consideration community growth, likely demographic changes, standards, and variables affecting facility needs. Park and recreation facility projections are difficult to accurately make. Active monitoring of participation rates and real demands provide "track" records from which trends can be established. Information contained within this chapter is intended to help guide rather than to provide specific decisions. Future discussions and decisions regarding facility development and redevelopment should rely on this chapter's contents for prudent decision -making. The principal decision -maker challenge is to maximize park and recreation facilities without deterioration due to overuse or compromised activities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 6-55 5 NEEDS AND DEMANDS MARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATING. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 6-66 • • • 6 Recreation Programs: Review and Analysis CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 6 PROGRAMS CHAPTER 6: RECREATION PROGRAMS: REVIEW AND ANALYSIS "This will not be a good place for any of us to live until it is a good place for all of us to live" Theodore Roosevelt In this Chapter, consideration is given to the major components of the leisure service delivery system and the organized recreation opportunities provided for the citizens of Eagan by the various parts of the system. While the focus of the overall plan is on the public municipal component, consideration of the nature and extent of the offerings of the other public agencies, as well as the quasi -public, the private, and the commercial segments of the system is of critical importance to the quality of the planning process. Accordingly, some cursory efforts have been made to assess the entire system, though a lack of hard data on portions of the system makes these efforts somewhat speculative. In any case, it appears that the public component's mission has been to provide the basic foundation of organized recreation opportunities in the community, and that the other providers have, at times, played a supplementary, and/or a complimentary, and, in some instances, a competitive role. • PUBLIC RECREATION IN EAGAN A. Eagan Park and Recreation Department As part of the overall plan, an assessment of the current program offerings of the Eagan Park and Recreation Department was conducted. Two separate and distinct procedures were used to assess the Departments offerings. The first procedure was a subjective assessment, using "desirable" program characteristics, of the departments programs as advertised in the seasonal brochures (catalogs of program opportunities) distributed to the residents. Secondly, a content analysis of participant evaluations was completed in a sampling of department sponsored programs. 1. Program Offerings: Absent the existence of national program standards, This assessment was conducted using "desirable program characteristics" as the criteria of evaluation. According to the literature in the field, "balance", "variety", "diversity", and "flexibility" in organized BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6•1 6 PROGRAMS programs have been identified as the "characteristics" most often sought in attempting to meet the programming needs of the community. It is often suggested that a variety of different programs, offered across the several program areas, using a diverse set of program formats, and designed to meet the distinct needs of different age and ability levels would be the "hallmark" of public recreation programming. Accordingly, the Eagan program offerings for 1992-93, as indicated in the program catalogs (brochures), were reviewed using "balance", "variety", "diversity", and "flexibility" as the desirable characteristics. In this context, "balance" is defined as having all of the major program areas (Arts, Athletics, Education, Environmental, and Social) represented in the offerings. "Variety" refers to the extent to which a broad range of different activities within each of the program areas is available. "Diversity" refers to offerings for different age and ability levels and to the use of different program formats to reach programmatic goals. Finally, the capacity of the department to adapt to changing needs and unique circumstances in the community, to respond to citizen wishes, and to adapt to weather, facility, and leadership limitations reflects the "flexibility" of the program in a variety of dimensions. The data for this assessment is depicted in Table 6.1. Following is a set of conclusions drawn from this analysis. Discussions with the Recreation programming staff, as well as the analysis of the program brochures, served as a prime sources of information on which this assessment has been based. — Not surprisingly, "summer" offerings tend to be greater in number and are dominated by youth programs. — Overall, youth and adult programs tend to dominate the offerings. This, of course, is appropriate as the demographics of the community indicate large numbers in these two age groups. In this context, "youth" are defined as those in the 0-12 age range. — The number of offerings in the "Sport, Fitness, Games" program area constitutes nearly one-half of the number of programs. It should be noted that this reflects the interests of the dominant age groups, and that these programs are designed to serve a wide range of abilities and all age groups, and use an appropriate array of program formats. • • • BARTON ASCNIVIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•B • • • 6 PROGRAMS — The "special event" programming format seems to be quite popular with the constituency. This format tends to exact a heavy toll on the staff, since special events require extensive planning, many details to handle, and a dependence (quite often) on outside providers. Nonetheless, one -day, "single shot" events remain popular with constituents and obviously meet some needs of the community. — The department offers a minimum amount of "Arts" programming (Cultural, Creative, and Performing). While there are numerous public, private, and voluntary organizations in the Metropolitan area serving the diverse "Arts" community, continued efforts should be made to expand this programming area to meet the needs of likely "pockets" of unserved constituents in the community. — There is a minimal amount of "Educational" programming offered thorough the department. This program area includes leisure skills, personal shills (CPR, First Aid, etc.), scientific, environmental, and outdoor education. It should be emphasized that other public agencies, namely the Community Education Departments of the School Districts serving Eagan, (See following section) offer numerous leisure skills courses, personal skills courses, and other classes that would be classified in this area. Also, "instructional" programs in leisure skills is a primary program format of many of the other leisure service providers, lessening the need for the department to use large resources in this program area. Yet, there are opportunities to expand environmental type programs, in cooperation with other public agencies. — Despite a relatively small population base of senior citizens, at this time, there is a fair amount of programs offered that have appeal to seniors. There is some staff and community support for a designated "senior space" for use in an expanded senior programming effort as the numbers of seniors increase. — The department offers a considerable amount of "Miscellaneous" programs that do no fall into one of the primary programming areas. Of particular note here would be the "Baby-sitting/Latch Key" training offered to teens, the "55 Alive" Driving program offered to Seniors, the "skate exchange", and the BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAQAN, MN S-3 6 PROGRAMS NYSCA coaches certification for youth sports coaches in the community. Overall Assessment The program offerings of the Eagan Park and Recreation Department represent a very good variety of sports activities and an acceptable balance in its program offerings. Also, the staff uses diverse program formats and attempts to serve all ability and age groups with its sponsored programs. Its registration policies, its regular evaluation of programs, new offerings each year, and its attempts to get feedback from its constituents would indicate a high degree of flexibility in the program. 2. Participant Evaluations: A content analysis of participant evaluations in seven separate programs constituted the second form of program evaluation. The Recreation staff regularly conducts participant evaluations in the organized programs and they provided sets of evaluations for Bandy, Softball, the Eaganettes, T-Ball for 5-year olds and for 6- and 7-year olds, Fitness and Fun, Games Kids Play, and the Youth Safety Camp conducted over the past year. Following are some general themes that emerged from this analysis. — There is a high degree of satisfaction with both the quality of the programs and the "convenience" items of "time", location; and length of programs. — There was a high degree of satisfaction with the overall "organization" of the programs offered by the department. — There was a considerable positive commentary on whether the programs met the expectations of the participants and the parents of child participants. — A substantial number of evaluations contained narrative commentary, suggestions, and plaudits. Very few negative comments were identified with the "need for a warming house" (for Bandy), and "too much standing around" in the T-Ball instruction as the most critical. (One may surmise that the participants really care about the quality in their programs by their willingness to take the time to fill out the evaluation forms and to write commentary.) • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; 'MOAN. MN 1:1-4 • • • 6 PROGRAMS Overall Assessment First of all, and most importantly, the fact that the staff takes the time to do program evaluations is highly commendable. Also, the fact that the administration of the program and department insist that this type of feedback is essential to meeting the needs of the community is laudatory. It is strongly recommended that this practice be continued and that further effort to refine the evaluation instrument (the participant evaluation form) be made. It is also recommended that the evaluation of adult sports be extended to include others (other than team captains alone) through periodic participant evaluations, formal evaluations by game officials, and by supervisory personnel as they observe play. 3. General Comments on Public (Municipal) Recreation in Eagan. The public recreation program in Eagan can be generally rated as "top-notch" and would be included in a top ten list of similar programs in the state of Minnesota. Using standard types of programming formats, offering typical types of leisure opportunities, and employing common marketing techniques, the Eagan Park and Recreation Department does an outstanding job. It has responded well to the marketplace, many of its services and programs are oversubscribed, and it has taken care of the wants and needs of its constituents in a timely and careful manner. Yet, the future looms large as demographic changes will create new wants and needs, limited financial resources will impact all public services, and technological advances will alter patterns of living. Further, there are some cutting edge programming issues that will necessitate some consideration for changes in the way the Department conducts its affairs in the near future. It is unlikely that the 'status quo' could be maintained even if the will to do so was very strong. Fortunately, there seems to be a willingness, even an eagerness, to excel and to be at the forefront of the parks and recreation field. Making the right choices for the future, then, becomes the challenge facing the people of Eagan, and the staff of professionals that serves them. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN S-5 6 PROGRAMS B. Community Education - Schools Districts #191, 196, & 197 Background Since 1971, School Districts in the state of Minnesota have been authorized to levy a "Community Education tax" for the purpose of providing educational, recreational, and community programs and to provide for community use of school facilities during non -school hours. Each of the three districts serving Eagan have opted to levy this tax (a per capita tax that is converted into a designated property tax) to support and fund a Community Education Department. A major portion of the programming efforts are recreational in nature and content, and, as previously stated, the class and instructional format is used extensively. The Community Education Departments are also charged with establishing procedures and priorities for "community" use of school facilities when available and a variety of community groups (including the Eagan Park and Recreation Department) have regularly used indoor and outdoor facilities. In addition to use of current school properties, cooperative planning of schools and parks between the cities and the districts have created new partnerships and new opportunities to use resources wisely. The three school districts serve the City of Eagan's geographical area in the following proportions: District 191-Burnsville, Eagan, Savage 20% District 196-Apple Valley, Eagan, Rosemount 70% District 197-West St. Paul 10% Independent School District #191 (Burnsville, Eagan, Savage) This district covers most of the western edge of Eagan where it borders the City of Burnsville. The Community Education department offers an extensive array of instructional programs for adults, youth, preschool, and early childhood family education. The use of 'telephone' registration through the Connection, using credit cards, is an innovative technique and a good example of public/private cooperation. Specific I.S.D. #191 School facilities located in Eagan are: 1. Metcalf Junior High (Diffley and Highway 13) (Indoor facilities include: 1 full size gym; 1 weight room; 1 pool; 1 auditorium. Outdoor facilities include 9 ballfields; 5 tennis courts; 1 football field) 2. Rahn Elementary (4424 Sandstone) (Indoor facilities: 1 small gym; outdoor: 2 ballfields) ■ARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAOAN, MN G-0 • • • 6 PROGRAMS 3. Cedar School (Diffley and Nicols) (Indoor facilities; 1 small gym; outdoor: 4 ballfields) Independent School District #196 (Apple Valley, Eagan, Rosemount) This district serves approximately 70% of Eagan's geographic area and population and provides a wide assortment of recreational, educational and life enrichment programs to the residents of the district, from preschool children to senior citizens. This district operates 10 school buildings in the city of Eagan, and is the largest single provider of public indoor facilities in the community. Specific I.S.D. #196 facilities in Eagan are as follows: 1. Eagan High School - Two full gyms, one auxiliary gym, a swimming pool, an auditorium, and a weight room, all indoors. Outdoor facilities include five baseball fields; two softball fields; 1 stadium with a track; two practice football fields; one soccer field; and three overlay soccer fields. 2. Dakota Hills Middle School - Indoor facilities include one gym. Outdoor facilities include four baseball fields and one football/track field. 3. Elementary Schools - There are seven elementary schools operated by District 196 located in Eagan. (Northview, Thomas Lake, Deerwood, Pinewood, Woodland, Oak Ridge, and Glacier Hills). Each of the schools has one gym, two ballfields, and one hardcourt area. Note: A new middle school is under construction and a new elementary school is scheduled to open in 1995. Independent School District #197 (West St. Paul) The northern section of Eagan is served by District 197, which operates only one elementary school —Pilot Knob —in the City. Many of the City's industrial and commercial districts are included in this district. The Community Education Department also offers a wide array of classes and programs for all age groups. The one elementary school has a gym which is used heavily by the Mend/Eagan Athletic Association and by other community groups. The outdoor hardcourts and ballfield is also heavily programmed during non -school times. BAP TON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B-7 6 PROGRAMS C. Other Publicly Owned Facilities in the City and Environs There are numerous other public facilities available to the residents of Eagan and to program staff on a somewhat limited basis. These include those owned by the County, the City, the Housing Authority, and by neighboring cities. Briefly, these facilities and programs are as follows: 1. County Library —In addition to its considerable literary, historical, cultural, and public collections of resources that have numerous recreational uses, the Library facility itself provides some meeting room facilities for conferences and planned meetings. 2. Oak Woods Senior Residence —A community room at the Oak Woods Senior facility is maintained by the Dakota County HRA for use by community groups. A priority and fee system operates to assure fair and equal treatment of all community groups that need a meeting facility. Senior programs offered by the Eagan Park and Recreation Department in this facility have a high priority. 3. Camp Sacajawea in Lebanon Hills Regional Park —The Camp facility is county owned and available for a variety of programs for youth and adults. The lodge facility is available on a rental fee basis and the overall camp has potential for separate or cooperative use with other public or private entities. 4. Fire Administration Building —The city's community room is located in the fire administration building. The community room is used by the city's park and recreation department and by the fire department and is available for use by private groups as well. 5. Golf Courses —Municipally owned and/or operated golf courses in surrounding cities include the following facilities: Apple Valley Golf Course (Apple Valley) Valleywood Golf Course (Apple Valley) Dwan Golf Club (Bloomington) Hyland Green Golf Club (Bloomington) Birnamwood Public Golf Course (Burnsville) lnverwood Golf Course (Inver Grove Heights) Rich Acres Golf Course (Richfield) 6. Historic Sites —Publicly owned historic sites include the "Old Town Hall" owned by the City of Eagan, which is presently underused. Also, historic Fort Snelling is • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN C-B • • • 6 PROGRAMS located nearby and serves as a cultural and historic resource for a variety of programming for a number of community groups. 7. Nature Centers —Publicly owned nature centers available for individual and group use located near to Eagan include: Woodlake Nature Center (Richfield); Richardson Nature Center (Hyland Hills Regional Park, Bloomington); Pike Island Interpretive Center (Fort Snelling State Park) and the Minnesota Zoological Gardens (Apple Valley). • PRIVATE SECTOR RECREATION IN THE EAGAN AREA A. The Quasi -Public Agencies —These agencies are classified on the basis of their legal status, which is non-profit, and charitable; their primary source of financial support, which is contribution; and by the nature of the clientele served. The Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, YMCA, Historical Societies; and some major conservation organizations are typical quasi - public agencies offering recreation and educational programs to members and others. In Eagan and surrounding area, the following have been identified as significant "players" in the offering of organized recreation, education, cultural, or historic programs. 1. Dakota Civic Theater —Organized in 1992, the theater offers residents the opportunity to participate in and enjoy its dramatic productions. 2. Caponi Art Park —Currently controlled by a non-profit foundation on the private property of Mr. Anthony Caponi, a local educator and artist, the concept of a public outdoor sculpture garden has received the enthusiastic and strategic assistance of the City Council and administration. When fully operational, the 60-acre parcel will offer the city residents a magnificent cultural and artistic resource strategically located near the center of the city. 3. Camp Butwin—This day camp is located on an 80 acre parcel within the Lebanon Hills Regional Park and is operated by the St. Paul Jewish Community Center for its members and guests. Membership in the JCC is open to all regardless of race, creed, color, or gender. BARTON ASCHNIAN ASWCIATElw INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN a•a 6 PROGRAMS 4. YMCA —The St. Paul YMCA is building a branch "Y" in the easternmost section of Eagan. When completed, the program offerings of the "Y" are expected to significantly increase and opportunities for joint and collaborative programming between the city and the "Y" need to be explored. 5. Turner's Gymnastic School —Located near the border of Eagan in Mendota Heights, this non-profit is dedicated to gymnastic instruction and performance of youth, and is amenable to joint programming with the City of Eagan and other providers. 6. The Athletic Associations —The Eagan Athletic Association, (EAA), The Mend -Eagan Athletic Association (Mend -Eagan), and the Burnsville Athletic Club (BAC) are separate (but similar) voluntary associations of adults, interested in the provision of youth sport opportunities and play a highly important role in the athletic programming for all organized youth athletics in Eagan. In cooperation with the City of Eagan Parks and Recreation Department and the community education departments of the several school districts, these organizations provide opportunities in a variety of sports for the large number of youth in the city. The success of these voluntary efforts has had a large impact on the plans for expanding athletic facilities in Eagan. 7. Thomas Irving Dodge Nature Center —Located in West St. Paul, the Dodge facility is dedicated to conservation efforts through environmental education. It has established close relationships with area school districts and individuals can purchase memberships. B. Private Club Recreation Opportunities in the Eagan Area The outstanding characteristic of these agencies is their exclusive membership policies and their primary source of financial support which is membership dues and assessments. Most of these clubs are "non-profit" in nature and merely attempt to provide leisure opportunities for members. 1. West End Rod and Gun Club —Located in the southeast section of Eagan, the club offers its members trap and skeet shooting opportunities. Because of the development in that section of Eagan, continued operation as a range is in some jeopardy. • • ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC_ PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 8.10 • • • 6 PROGRAMS 2. Lost Spur Country Club —Located in the northwest corner of Eagan, this 9-hole golf course and clubhouse offers sport and social programs for its members and guests. 3. Mendakota Country Club —This 18-hole championship golf course is located in adjacent Mendota Heights. A modern clubhouse offers its members social and dining opportunities, and the club offers its members golf competition and recreation activities. 4. Southview Country Club —This 18-hole championship golf course is located in West St. Paul, and offers its members a variety of social and athletic activities. The Club annually makes its facility available for the Tapemark Charity Golf Tournament. 5. Somerset Country Club —This 18-hole championship golf course is located in Mendota Heights, and offers its members athletic and social programs. C. Commercial Recreation Opportunities in Eagan Area There are numerous "for profit" agencies and facilities operating in and near Eagan offering a great variety of recreational activity for the citizens. The distinguishing characteristic of "commercial" recreation is its profit motive and its extensive use of participant fees to fund operations and maintenance and amortize capital costs. 1. Carriage Hills Golf Course —This privately owned daily fee golf course is located in central Eagan off of Yankee Doodle Road between Lexington and Elrene Road. Men's and Women's leagues operate throughout the season and public play is available at other times. 2. Parkview Golf Course —This privately owned daily fee golf course is located in the southern part of Eagan off of Cliff Road between Pilot Knob and Lexington. In addition to the Golf Course, a picnic area and barbecue for large group use is available. League play is offered for Men, Women, Couples, Seniors, and Juniors. Annual season memberships are available as well as daily greens fees. 3. Brockway Golf Club —This privately owned daily fee 9- hole golf course is located in Rosemount. SARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; LAGAN, MN S-11 6 PROGRAMS 4. Orchard Gardens Golf Course —This privately owned daily fee 9-hole golf course is located in Burnsville. 5. Eagan Athletic Club —Located on Pilot Knob Road north of Yankee Doodle Road, this facility has four indoor tennis courts, four handbalUracquetball courts, an indoor pool, sauna, whirlpool, cardiovascular testing equipment, "free" weights, aerobics room, two tanning beds, and a child care facility. Program activities include aerobics classes, volleyball leagues, swim lessons, line dancing, personal training, and weight loss programs. 6. Bally's U.S. Swim and Fitness —Located in the Cedarvale Mall, it has been in business since 1983. Its facilities, all indoors, include a swimming pool, running track, treadmills, stairmasters, exercise bicycles, rowing machines and free weights. Program activities include fitness evaluation and training sessions, body fat testing, and aerobics classes. 7. Lifetime Fitness —A 65,000 square foot health and fitness club. Theater and restaurant have been planned for future development. It is to be located on the north side of Thomas Lake Drive and is scheduled for a Fall 1994 opening. 8. Cedarvale Lanes —This is a 32-lane bowling lane alley that includes a lounge, restaurant, and a banquet room that can seat 120. Available for group reservations, open bowling and league play. 9. Grand Slam —Located in Cedarville Mall, this "all indoor family entertainment center" has been in operation since 1988. Facilities include bating cages, mini -golf, video games, train ride, go carts, bumper cars, a (36' x 80') synthetic ice rink, adventure play land, two sand volleyball courts, and two slam dunk basketball courts. Programming largely involves instructional clinics and some group social events like birthday parties. 10. The Dive Shop/Swim School —Located on Yankee Doodle and Coachman Roads, the facility features a 25' x 50' swimming pool, as well as a full line of SCUBA equipment. In addition to SCUBA lessons, a swimming school offers private and semi -private swimming lessons from beginning to competitive level, and including developmentally disabled. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6•12 • • • 6 PROGRAMS 11. Romp and Roll —This is an indoor playground facility located in the Cliff Lake Shopping Center in southwest Eagan. There are two separate play ares, one for toddlers, and one for children from 3-12. Programming includes birthday parties and a "drop and shop" program for shoppers in the Cliff Lake Shopping Center. (Note: This facility was closed June 1, 1994.) 12. Splat Ball —This is a competitive "war game" facility that operates in a vacant supermarket in West Eagan. Two separate 8,500 square foot "battlegrounds" complete with mock buildings and landscape comprise the major facility. Individual and group rates are available. 13. Briano's Reception HalUCatering Service —This facility provides a reception hall for seating up to 500 people and could be used for meeting purposes. Located on Cliff Road near the Burnsville -Eagan boundary. 14. Monique School of Dance —Located in the Yankee Square Shopping Center, the school offers free performances for community events, nursing homes, and hospitals. Offering instruction in ballet, tap and jazz dance, the Eagan facility has been open for eight years and the Apple Valley studio for 22 years. 15. Dyan's World of Dance —Located in Cedarville Highlands Shopping Mall, the business offers a full range of dance instruction in tap, ballet, and jazz. 16. Diamond "T" Ranch —located in southern Eagan, off of Pilot Knob Road, this facility offers a variety of activities centering on bridlery. Trail riding, hay rides, sleigh rides, and western riding lessons are featured. A rental hall is also available and cross country skis are available for rent for use in Lebanon Hills Regional Park, located adjacent to the ranch. 17. Scheduled for opening in the Fall of 1994 is the 8- screen Mann Theater near the intersection of Yankee Doodle and Town Centre Drive. D. Other Non -Public Providers in the Eagan Area Several churches, private and parochial schools, and the Rasmussen Business College are potential sources of useable facilities and as providers of recreation activities for members and guests as well. Of particular note in this BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 6-13 6 PROGRAMS category of "others", the soccer facilities at Blue Cross/Blue Shield and the softball fields at UNISYS play a significant role in the city's programming. E. Overall Assessment of Recreation Opportunities The City of Eagan appears to be well -served with organized recreation opportunities and with ample opportunities for self -directed activity as well. The various components of the leisure service delivery system are well represented by the varied mix of agencies, facilities, and programs evidenced above and in other inventories presented in the plan. Yet, the overall system may not be providing sufficient opportunities to some segments of the population, as coordination of effort among the agencies is, for the most part, sporadic and inconsistent, and is totally lacking in some instances. It is clear, even from the rather cursory review of the various components of the system, that as the City of Eagan matures and its demographics stabilize, the need for greater and more sophisticated coordination and cooperation between and among the various providers will become more evident. Duplication of effort and sameness of service need to be minimized even when some healthy competition between providers is shown to enhance the quality of services offered. An important conclusion from the above analysis would be that the overall private sector, (but the "for -profit" segment in particular), will continue to grow in response to consumer demands. Further, the public sector will need to more carefully "pick and choose" its target markets and, in particular, to focus its efforts by developing a clearly articulated mission and purpose statement. Continued refinement of program formats, responses to citizen wants and needs, and the continued development of effective communication linkages with the neighborhoods will serve to enhance the quality of service to the citizens of Eagan. • NATIONAL TRENDS (that may impact the future delivery of leisure services in the community) There are several national trends that seem to be particularly relevant to the future delivery of recreation, park and leisure services in the City of Eagan and immediate surroundings. The exact or precise impacts that these "trends" will have cannot be easily predicted, and there is the possibility that other, yet unforeseen changes will indicate a different course needs to be set. Nevertheless, to the extent of our limited vision, the following general trends seem worthy of consideration. A. Adultism—As most demographers will attest, the aging of the nation's population will continue to place increasing MARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN W14 • • • 6 PROGRAMS demands for a variety of health and related services. To the extent that leisure service agencies are able and willing to assume some responsibilities for preventive health, the emphasis of senior citizen programming will likely need to be broadened and extended to more people in more places in the community. B. "Greening" The Environmental Imperative —The increased interest in the preservation of natural areas in the community may dictate that we adopt land use policies and park development policies where our current "manicurist" tendencies will need to change to a more "let's care for" (the small natural park) areas philosophy. This may also drive the need for more environmental programming for adults as well as children and youth, and leadership in environmental concerns in general. C. Holistic Health —A number of futurists have indicated that a more holistic approach to health care will become a national and even a worldwide trend. A healthy leisure lifestyle will be a partner with good nutrition, regular exercise, and a general concern for quality curative measures. From a programming perspective, opportunities for education and opportunities for healthy play activities for all ages will be an underlying philosophy for leisure service agencies. D. Prevention Paradigm —Closely aligned with "Holistic Health" is the expectation that human service agencies will invest increasing effort to "prevent" human dysfunction in all aspects of life. Crime, delinquency, sexual misconduct, abuse of all types, and other indicators of social problems will be countered by "prevention" measures of all types. Leisure service agencies have been claiming a "prevention" value for many years —we need to convince others that we can and do make a difference by the nature of the programming we conduct. E. Structured Economic Change —The emergence of market economies in many different parts of the world will continue to be plagued by the existence of many persons who are underemployed, (some of them identified as "techno- peasants"—people engaged in the mundane parts of a rapidly expanding technology). A by-product of this trend will be a shrinking leisure dollar which has challenging implications for all leisure providers. F. Electronic Entertainment —The development of all types of electronic games, instruments, and entertainments pose a continuing competitive problem for traditional leisure service providers. Fiber optics, video games and virtual reality developments are likely to change the way many people BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 8-76 6 PROGRAMS seek and find entertainment, spend their leisure time and dollars, and engage others in a somewhat artificial social environment. General and specific activity patterns are likely to undergo some dramatic and fundamental changes. These developments will mandate some changes in the way leisure providers will conduct their "business" and may drive some basic changes in the role of government as a primary provider. Using a health care analogy, public agencies may become the "general practitioners" and the other sectors will take on the roles of specialists and technicians. G. General Activity Pattern Changes: Highly structured leisure services for the general population are "out". Informal, flexible, and spontaneous activities are "in". Externally directed activities will experience a decline while self -directed activities will increase. Passive and reflective activities are growing in popularity. More people are seeking a "depth of experience" in their leisure activities. The mainstream of society will embrace a life-long learning culture (Elderhostels, adult education programs, educational television, etc.) Leisure "palaces" such as wave pools, highly sophisticated fitness centers, and other extensive and expensive facilities are losing their "glitter" and support in the public sector. People are looking for inexpensive, purposeful, and fulfilling leisure activities that are more than merely "fun" to do. H. Specific Activity Changes: Team sports are declining in popularity, while individual and dual activities are increasing in numbers of participants. In -line skating, cross-country skiing, and bicycling are activities that are driving an interest in trails and other linear recreation and transportation spaces. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN C-'113 • • • 6 PROGRAMS - Disc golf, bocce ball, and sand volleyball are "up-and- coming" activities that could place some immediate demands for specialized facilities on the table. - Life-long sports and active recreation activities like golf, tennis, walking for pleasure, jogging, and similar activities will continue in popularity. - Interest in environmentally oriented programs continues to grow. Environmental education is one activity that can be continued in non -school programs such as parks and recreation, youth groups, and commercial enterprises. This type of programming calls on the expertise of park, natural resource, and recreation workers. • POLICY ISSUES FOR PUBLIC RECREATION IN EAGAN A. Identify and adopt a "mission" statement that confronts the dichotomy between responding to the wants and needs of the various constituencies on the one hand, and adopting a more purposeful approach where only wholesome activities and those that result in social change are offered on the opposite end of continuum. (Many departments attempt to strike somewhat of a middle ground between these two extremes, and as a result, tend to be torn in different directions when resources get scarce). Once a major direction is adopted, it is important that the department acts on its mission with vigor, confidence and conviction. B. Consider alternative forms of "serving". The programs assessed above were offered on the basis of providing direct services to participants where the department provides facilities, leadership, and other resources to participants. It is the most common form of service and is favored among providers because total responsibility (and rewards) remain with the primary agency. Many park and recreation staffs are made up of individuals who, in total, have expertise across a wide variety or program areas, program formats, and age and ability levels. They are, in fact, selected for their direct service programming abilities in many cases. In times of tight budgets, however, other less consumptive ways of providing assistance to recreationists need to be considered. Other options include catalyst/ enabler; information/referral (a type of "brokering"); and advocacy. Another strategy to stretch resources, and provide high quality programming, is cooperative program planning and cooperative program deliver. (Note: the Eagan Department already does considerable cooperative programming, and, on a less formal basis, offers BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 8.17 6 PROGRAMS information and referral services and provides some enabling assistance to some special interest clubs). C. Serving the needs and wants of special population groups. Of particular concern here are some of the typical "hard -to - reach" groups such as "youth -at -risk"; persons with disabling conditions; "teenagers"; and, in Eagan, an anticipated growing number of seniors —a major caution here. Efforts to serve these groups will be relatively costly in time and money and will only succeed to the extent that programming is done "with these groups" and not for them. Cooperative and coordinated efforts of all the providers will be necessary if even a modicum of success is to be realized. It is likely that traditional recipients of the department's services will see a reduction in those services unless new resources are made available. Nonetheless, planning for the future may include more of an enabling stance to serve interest groups, adding an "information/referral" service, and serving in an advocacy role in selected situations. Certainly, the continued efforts for more complimentary and cooperative services should be considered. D. Others. (Following are a number of smaller issues that will have some bearing on the future of recreation in Eagan.) Should park and recreation programs for youth and teens in the summer be designed to be an extension of the school year (in a much less formal setting, of course) or should such programming be viewed as a complete escape from the rigors of formal training? To what extent should programs be subsidized or self- supporting? What type of non-resident fees, if any, should be imposed? Do fees inhibit the agency's ability to program cooperatively with others? Should adults and seniors be required to become more independent in providing programs for their groups? Should all programs and facilities be designed to accommodate and encourage persons with disabilities to participate? What does the law say about this (Americans With Disabilities Act, P.L. 101-336)? Are segregated programs an adequate response for this segment of the community? Are some forms of recreation not acceptable for sponsorship by the department (e.g. trips for seniors and adults to casinos, "heavy metal" rock concerts in city parks)? e • BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAOAN. MN S-10 • • • 6 PROGRAMS — Should the public park and recreation department assume the role of primarily serving those segments of the population that are not being served by other public or private sector businesses or groups? (What should the guiding principle be in dealing with new leisure agencies in the city such as the YMCA?) — What is the "recreation" function of neighborhood, community and "mini -parks"? — What role do "entrepreneurship" and "intrepreneurship" play in the City of Eagan's future, particularly with respect to meeting leisure needs? In this context, "entrepreneurship" is meant to convey the idea that individual recreation leaders have considerable flexibility in methods and techniques of achieving program objectives and have independent decision - making authority in working with people in programs. The concept of "intrepreneurship" is meant to convey the idea that performance evaluation of workers and overall program evaluation would be highly quantified (not exclusively) and that management by "results" would be the standard approach to program assessment. • RECREATION PROGRAMS - CONCEPTS FOR IMPROVEMENT The final section of this chapter addresses specific areas or items of concern for the provision of recreation opportunities for the residents of Eagan and, to a limited extent, for its immediate neighbors, both for the near term and for the long term. The recommendations provided here are offered with the sole intent to maximize the opportunities for quality recreation services. To our knowledge, these are all "do -able", though abilities, beliefs, and energy of the staff, the commission, and the city council will modify and shape the exact measures to be taken. And, of course, the will, wants, and needs of the constituency will have a profound impact on the nature and extent of the services to be offered in the future. A. Our first concern is the absence of a written mission statement which would aid and assist in developing policies and procedures to guide the continuing development of the Park and Recreation Department. The increasing population, the migration patterns, the bimodal (by age) distribution of the population, and income patterns of residents will each create demands on what is likely to be ever shrinking financial resources. The leisure marketplace will continue to attract new providers and it will become necessary to establish one's "stake" if some semblance of BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN i EAG AN. MN 8-19 6 PROGRAMS equal opportunity is to be assured. While it is not likely that the department can "be all things to all people", the nature of public services in general, and public recreation in particular, is to be "some thing to all of the people". A mission statement will allow the department to establish priorities of service, different levels of service, and assist in forging partnerships with other providers. Such a statement will "carve a niche" for the department as a provider of public service worthy of taxpayer's support. B. From a "recreation" perspective, parks are primarily (but not exclusively) places for "recreation" to occur, whether that be active or passive, exuberant or contemplative, individually or in a group. The design, maintenance, and operation of park facilities need to constantly be cognizant of this perspective, as engaging more and more of the residents in meaningful recreation pursuits is a fundamental charge of the profession, and will insure the continued support for the department. On the other hand, "parks" and "open spaces" (whether public or private) can serve as scientific places for the natural world to occur, as "buffers" between non - compatible land uses, and as natural "air conditioners" to combat the heat of the city. This "multiple use" perspective on parks creates some healthy "tension" between recreationists and others and serves to support the establishment of internal and external partnerships. C. The department should aggressively pursue "partnerships" for its programs in most instances. In a sense, some of the most successful programming now occurring in Eagan has resulted from a partnership. The provision of youth sports programs, a joint effort of the Eagan Athletic Association, the school districts, and the City of Eagan, has been a large "success" story, and this partnership has been able to respond to the increasing demand of this population group. There are several types of partnerships that can be used. Cooperative programming, joint programming, sponsorships by businesses, shared facilities, and other forms of public/private cooperative efforts will maximize opportunity for the people of Eagan. D. The department needs to establish recreation program standards similar to park maintenance and park dimension standards. Of particular concern are leader to participant ratios of the various age groups, for different types of programs, and levels of expertise required for top quality programming. Further, "risk management" procedures need to be regularly reviewed and modified, and a standard set of emergency procedures put in place as new programming comes on line. • MARTON ASCHMAAI ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN G-SO • • • 6 PROGRAMS E. Future expansion of recreation offerings is dependent on three related, but separable issues and events. Additional facilities, particularly indoor space, will be needed as the general population continues to grow. • The need for programmable space that can be reserved for departmental programs is critical. One solution to this is, of course, a Community Center facility, which needs to be addressed in the near to mid term. • Secondly, expansion of full-time staff and the resulting budget increase must be addressed. At the minimum, the relative share of the General Fund budget must be maintained. If new facilities are brought "on line", a larger share of the budget or alternative financing for parts of the program will be necessary. • A third related factor is the level of "inclusiveness" of the mission statement. The larger and broader the mission, the greater the need for additional resources — financial, space, and personnel. F. Consideration of "enterprise funding" for such things as a swimming facility, golf course, ice arena, and some self- supporting programs (e.g. adult sports) should be addressed at the staff and policy levels. Cooperative planning with other public bodies (county, school districts, neighboring cities) on these should be considered. G. Finally, the department needs to be ready to adopt additional responsibilities for youth work, particularly the early adolescent age group. Challenging, meaningful, and adventure type of programming needs to be developed with representatives of this age group, often labeled as "hard to reach". This area of programming is particularly amenable to joint efforts among the various youth agencies, the city, and the schools. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN• MN 6-R1 TABLE 1 - EAGAN RECREATION PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS - 1992-93 PROGRAM BALANCE - VARIETY PROGRAM DIVERSITY Program format Age Level Ability Program Area Program Title Term Ind. Dual Group Spec. Class Club League Tour. Camp/ Trip Youth Teen Adult Sr. Fam. Beg. Int. Adv. Event Cllnilc SPORTS Football,( Touch, Flag) F x Volleyball F x In -line Skating lessons F,S, Su x 3-Man Basketball F x 5-Man Basketball F x Men's Broomball F x Co-rec Broomball F x Adult Softball Su, F x 4-Man Hockey F, W x Boot Hockey F, W x Skate with Santa W x Speedskating lessons W x Skating lessons W x Bandy School W x Snow Tubing W x X-Country Ski Lessons W x Snow Softball W x Co-ed Volleyball W x Boot Hockey Tourney W x Downhill Skiing W x Rollerblading / Dome W x Minnesota North Stars W x "All new" TImberwolvea W x Totally Tubular Teen Time W x Baseball Clinic S x x Eagan Softball Clinic S x x Tennis Blitz S x x Adult Soccer S x Golf Lessons S,Su x Eagan 'Fun' Run 5 x Fitness and Fun -3 yr. olds All x x Games Kids Play All x x Youth Tennis Su x x Instr. T-Ball -5 yr olds Su x Ground -Pounders Gran P Su x Softball Camps Su x x Fleet Feet Walking Club All x x x Free Wheelers Biking All x x x Sports & Games Camp Su x Instr. T-Ball, 667 yr. olds Su x Sand Volleyball -Officiated Su x Sand VB- unofficiated Su x Eagan Men's Tennis Su x x Adult Tennis Lessons Su x x So. River Team Tennis Su x x So River Jr. Team Tennis Su x x USTA Jr. Tennis Su x x So. River Jr. Tennis Camps Su x x 3 on 3 outdoor Basketball Su x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x X x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x swVLIDO 1d • • • • • • Table 1 PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS. 1992-93 (Cont'd) Program Area Program Title Term Ind. Dual Group Spec. Class Club League Tour. Camp/ Trip Youth Teen Adult Sr. Fam. Beg. Int. Adv. Event Clinic ARTS Creative Expressions F,W,S x (CULTURAL , Photo Contest W x x CREATIVE, Disney's World on Ice W x x & PERFORM- Old Log Theatet F x x ING ARTS) Guthrie Theater F x x Teddy Bear Band W x x Pre -School Movement Su x Eaganettes Su x Camp Creative Su x Evening in the Park Su x x x x Movies in the Park Su x x x x E D U C A- An Evening with the Stars F,S x x TIONAL Eath Day Festival S x x x x Spring Fishing Seminar S x (LITERARY, Nature Camp Su x SCIENTIFIC, Crystal Cava Su x ENVIRON- Horseback Riding Su x MENTAL, & Fishing Clinic for Kids Su x OUTDOOR) Kids Fishing Derby Su x x Camp Pre -School Su x Day Camp Su x Summer in the Park Su x x Wagonful O'Fun Su x x Winter Weekend W x x x x (ice Fishing, Skating, Etc.) MISCELL- Babysitting/Latch key All x A N E O U S ss Alive, Mature Driving W x (PERSONAL Eagan Seniors All x SKILLS, Tiny Tots Rec. Activities All x SOCIAL, Eagan Youth Safety Camp Su x OUTINGS, & School's Out party F,W,S x x OTHER) Halloween Special Event F x x Pizza, Rollerskating Party F x x Children's Egg Hunt S x x Breakfast/ Easter Bunny S x x Beach Party Fun S x x Mn Harvest Apple Orchard F x x x Sesame Street Live F x x x Halloween Spook Trail F x x Beaver Mountain Su x Richfield Pool & Mini -Golf Su x Cedar Lake Farm Su x Tubing the Apple River Su x Wave Pool Su x Dog Obedience F, W x Flu immunization F x NYSCA Coaches Cert. F x Skate Exchange W x x Vacation Special Events W x x KEY : F = Fall; W = Winter S = Spring; Su=Summer x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x x X x x x x X x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x X x x X x x x x x x x x x x X swVJDodd 6 PROGRAMS BARTON A5C1#MAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAOAN, MN 6-114 • Natural Resources • .41 CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 7: NATURAL RESOURCES • INTRODUCTION Natural resource preservation is a fundamental element of Eagan's park and open space planning. These resources are intrinsic to Eagan's character and are worthy of ongoing protection from development and continued careful management. Resource elements include lakes, water basins, wetlands, wooded areas, the river corridor, blufflines, and drainage corridors. Open space areas exhibiting these characteristics should be viewed, enjoyed, preserved, and managed as a part of the community's overall natural resource system. The resources also reflect the community's geological and cultural history. This section describes resources that contribute to Eagan's character, rationale supporting resource preservation, open space parcels of priority, and preservation methods. An assessment of programs, policies, and ordinances guiding land development and resource preservation are discussed. Opportunities for natural resource interpretation are also outlined. ■ HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The "Lone Oak Years," a History of Eagan, Minnesota, is a historical summary of Eagan's development and cultural elements. According to the text, the community's geologic history is traced back to the Wisconsin Glaciacian period. The knob and kettle topography of Eagan is a glacial deposit of a complex geologic mixture called the "St. Croix Moraine." Eagan's geography was further defined by subsequent glaciacian during the St. Croix phase. Melting of one of the glacier's lobes defined the Minnesota and Mississippi River valleys and the topography that lines the river edges. Material deposited by the melting glaciers formed the irregular rounding hills and steep sided hollows that form many of Eagan's small lakes and wetlands. Further documentation in Lone Oak Years identifies the importance of farming to the community's early years. Early terrain was fairly hilly with heavy wooded areas within the pre - city township. As land settling occurred, the land was cleared and heavy deposits of glacial rocks removed to enable farming activities. Early agricultural activities in the late 1800s and early 1900s established Eagan as a market gardening and small grains area. These activities have significance for the BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7-1 7 NATURAL RESOURCES community as native vegetation and tree cover was impacted by agricultural concerns. Many Oak woodlands still prominent in the community today were spared from agricultural impact and provide one of the community's primary natural ecosystem bases. From the 1960s through the present, Eagan has witnessed rapid community development and land consumption. Policies on environmental impact have restricted actual impact. However, resource base damage has occurred due to non -point source pollution, woodland removal, erosion, air pollution, and wetland filling. ■ EXISTING NATURAL RESOURCE BASE It is important to understand the various components of Eagan's natural resource base individually to fully comprehend their importance for the community in aggregate. Natural resource base patterns within Eagan are illustrated on Figure 7.1 and described below. The Minnesota River Valley occurs in the northwest quadrant of the City, forming its boundary with Bloomington. Floodplain and wetland areas characteristic of the river valley consume those parcels set back one-half to three-quarters miles from the main river channel. The river valley's resource base is currently managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) through joint actions of preservation and conservation. These actions include fen and deer management, Minnesota River cleanup, and floodplain/river corridor acquisition. Lakes and small water basins are abundant in Eagan, remnants of the retreating glaciers and their meltwater. While heavy concentrations of these water bodies exist, their size are generally quite moderate, lending themselves to aesthetic and habitat value rather than extensive recreational use. Principal lakes with recreation value or potential include: LeMay Lake, Blackhawk Lake, Fish Lake, O'Leary Lake, Thomas Lake, and Quigley Lake. Eagan's multiple water basins have provided an impressive setting for its residential neighborhoods. Furthermore, these basins provide habitat and flood protection value of significance to the community. Similarly, wetlands within Eagan are quite prominent and result from previous glacial activity. Wetlands are distributed primarily through the central and southern portion of the City, often associated with other open water basins and lake area. Once again, wetlands function as both habitat and aquifer recharge elements aside from their aesthetic contribution to the community. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7•R • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Forest cover within the City varies widely. A recent inventory conducted by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources examined non -cultural tree cover within the City. Based upon a Landsat image photo from June 1988, the mapping identifies forest cover to a 30-meter resolution. Principal populations include conifer, deciduous, forested wetlands, savannah forest, and shrublands. Savannah forest is widely distributed through nondeveloped portions of the community with the greatest concentrations occurring in the central and northeast sectors. Deciduous trees such as oaks are also concentrated in the central area with heavy tree cover within the south-central portion of the City, including Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Deciduous tree populations have diminished since the mid- 1800s, impacted by both early agricultural activities and more recent development patterns. Conifer tree populations exist but are limited to small concentrations of low density. Shrublands are largely associated with wetland edges or parcels free of development. Rolling terrain is one of Eagan's most visible physiographic characteristics. Significant topographic relief resulting from the glacial action exists within the central and southern portion of the community. The rolling terrain poses challenges for development and infrastructure construction, however, it provides community interest and a relief from development intensities. Eagan does not possess substantial Minnesota River blufflines of prominence such as Bloomington, Burnsville, or Eden Prairie. However, vantage points of the metropolitan skyline exist looking across the river valley floodplain. Passive open space currently does not exist within the Minnesota River Valley, inland water basins, wetlands, forest cover, and steep topography. Those parcels are primarily held by regional open space (county, state, and federal) and as undeveloped municipal park land. Wetland acreage is also privately held with statutory restrictions. Privately owned open space exists as undeveloped acreage subject to subdivision for residential, commercial, or industrial uses. City and state/federal environmental regulations exist for sensitive areas, however, these are primarily targeted toward wetland and water basins. As Eagan moves toward maturity and full development, natural resource parcels free from development will diminish and be limited primarily to agency land and parcels with statutory restrictions. Preservation of natural resource across becomes more important with time. BAFITON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PI -AN; SAGAN, MN 7.3 7 NATURAL RESOURCES • WHY PRESERVE THE RESOURCE BASE Suburbanization of the Twin Cities metropolitan area has elevated issues pertaining to preservation of the resource base. Issues and discussions involving preservation procedures, land parcels, and establishment of priorities are difficult. Varying perspectives are presented, often with elevated emotion, based on the virtues of development versus retention of natural resource features. The question of "why preserve" or "why manage" a community's resource base is often distilled to specific arguments. These include: 1. Preservation of the resource base should include maintenance of wildlife habitat and movement corridors and sustaining wildlife population levels. Balance within the ecosystem must be strived for including the variety of habitats found within Eagan. 2. Rare or endangered flora and fauna representing the community's rare plants, animals, natural communities, and geologic features are important for protection and management of the area's biological diversity. Consultation with the DNR's Minnesota Natural Heritage Program has earmarked populations and species of endangered plants, animals, or communities within Eagan. An inventory of the Eagan area by DNR was completed in early 1994. In general, the remaining rare or endangered species occur within the Minnesota Valley Corridor and Lebanon Hills Regional Park. 3. Storm water detention and aquifer recharge occurs within water basins and wetland areas. Eagan's rich heritage of these systems suggest the important role that basins and wetlands play within the community. 4. Rapid development and building intensity suggests the need for visual relief and aesthetic considerations. Natural systems provide a contrast to the buitt environment necessary for quality of life and to maintain real estate property values. They also serve in many locations as a buffer between conflicting land uses. 5. Preservation of outstanding natural features is an important component of the community's historical perspective and sense of roots. For example, Eagan's adoption of the oak species as its community logo suggests that a strong desire exists to retain the community's oak woodlands and specific preservation of those trees of significant size, stature, and age. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.4 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES 6. Environmental education is important to the entire community for its quality of life. Knowledge and sensitivity to ecological principles should be strived for better management and sensitivity to our environment. This education process is best accommodated within outdoor classrooms and based upon community preservation principles. • OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION STUDY Prominent second and third ring suburbs across the Twin Cities metropolitan area are currently dealing with issues pertaining to preservation of their resource base and related open space. A conflict presents itself when rapid paced development either impacts, or is viewed as impacting, a community's natural resource base thereby reducing open space. Numerous issues and arguments are presented from both professional and lay community representatives. Real and perceived issues are presented often times based upon emotional responses rather than accurate analysis and assessments. The evaluation and analysis of remaining open space is a valuable and prudent exercise to assist community decision - makers and residents in establishing the significance of open space and its contribution to the community's quality of life. The City of Eagan undertook such a study as a part of the Park and Open Space System planning process. Primary tasks of the study included: 1) existing open space and natural resource areas were identified and inventoried to understand their physical characteristics and location within the community; 2) an objective assessment and initial screening was made to determine the contribution of these resources to the community and its natural resource base; and 3) a hierarchy of the parcels was established in terms of their value for preservation. Measures for acquisition or preservation through regulation were established and action taken towards implementation. The critical component of the study is its assessment of the resource base. This exercise was conducted in an objective, professional manner which fully documents procedures and conclusions. This step served as the focus for future discussions and also provides the basis on which future decision -making will be made. Initial Open Space Screening Undeveloped parcels currently in existence within Eagan provided the basis for initial screening. City staff mapped and assembled baseline information that included natural resource pattern information shown on Figure 7.1. Potential sites were field -reviewed and documented with a consultant/staff team BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.5 7 NATURAL RESOURCES representing multiple disciplines. This exercise screened priority sites from all available open space parcels. Table 7.1 and Figure 7.2 summarize available sites and their characteristics. Priority sites for further evaluation are recognized. Screening criteria that were employed included the following items: Wetlands • basins larger than two acres ■ high quality classification basins, i.e. Types I - IV Woodland Areas • species composition • diversity of age classes • presence of heritage trees Prairie Remnants Native Plant Massings • woody plants • grass/flowers • unique or unusual species Topographic Elements ■ steep slopes or bluff lines of unique or unusual character, areas difficult to develop • Water Features • access to lakes ■ open springs • creeks or ravines • Occurrence of Rare or Endangered Species • Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Inventory sites • Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage element occurrence (E.O.) ranking Site Evaluation Criteria for Prioritization The following criteria in Tables 7.2 and 7.3 were applied to the reduced groups of priority sites as a means of determining their priority hierarchy and preservation within the City. The purpose of these criteria was to assist in providing a broad -based evaluation that in turn establishes a community -based action. Open space criteria noted in Tables 7.2 and 7.3 were employed during a site evaluation process conducted by the Land Acquisition and Development Committee, a working group within the Park, Open Space, and Natural Resources Commission. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.6 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Sites previously identified by the consultant and staff as parcels meriting additional consideration were reviewed by the Committee. Field trips lead by staff provided an intimate opportunity for the Committee to view candidate parcels first hand and complete a side -by -side comparison. This process enabled the Committee to establish a hierarchy within the open space parcels and produce a priority ranking (refer to Table 7.4). Community mapping and the field review also enabled Committee members to understand the open space parcels' potential contribution to the community and their relationship to existing and planned park system parcels. Work and preliminary conclusions completed by the Committee were presented and reviewed by the entire Commission. A general schedule for acquisition was established on a near -term, mid-term, and Tong -term basis. Chapter 10, Land Acquisition and Facility Development, provides greater detail regarding parcel acquisition priorities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.7 7 NATURAL RESOURCES •ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN] •AG ANC MN 7•• IIiHI llll� iii rem` • ia"It� 7 NATURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 7-1 Eagan Site Evaluation Factors Ili Lakes Wetlands High Erosion Potential Soils Hydric Soils Wet Spots Marsh Drainage Features 100 Year Flood Plain Parcel Boundaries A N w l Cam,w.Ir tile MOM COUNT K emrle I. War• WO, mewed Imp r. dewy sll► r brlll.r M r r.. rMO. The ore Y. Amor= r mode I.rmmile. m Iu.Md M ..Y_ rele wlr. bode — Memel w. — .Ire roam elMly Y N em_I. Mel Y M lie I.• wrym mere Mir. IMMO Orly Y elk Ie...Ml. /.l bode rrrra ■ +___el. me Mime Mre rem" Mr rem. Prepared by: Daioota County Office of Planning, 3/94. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 7-9 MENDOTA HtIGHTIS . , 1 1161114k1641k, ALM! 411„Ikl,tio,m, a • 1411-, ,-- - -I - - ------,,---.4.— ivowill •••••••••••••E •aaataitour:e •••,4..--,.....,,,,,-...--,,,u., : -...---..i.i...'k...4--,,,,ki.kz.... ••:•---,---L*1-..,:.-.4.._--,...--...-1--,•;-,:-.,..-. ArtAriva.„,s,m,,wir ..:: : ..- • . • . • i i . 1 ' ''' „.. •----- / ," A ',2,- , e \ 17C------i- - TY. -7- •.". ... = s ,.,-e z ,-, ,,.„, Silver Bell Rd.i -$.4'......-.. ---"- C, --- eV WOODHAVEN „.1.--- i ,-;,.. Tr. BLACKRAWK e-yr. as.).Y35 - --(SPER1DOT PATH T. ...........ty 1 c...rnekan La LAXNL CEDAR POND i C--", : CARLSON._ LAKE e••••••••swisswirsossaas•etitsum•••••••• 'LROSCqOUNT C\a, 7 NATURAL RESOURCES FIGURE 7-2 Community Open Space Evaluation LEGEND PARKLAND UNDEVELOPED OPEN SPACE UNDEVELOPED OPEN SPACE, PRIORITY SITE (AFTER INITIAL SCREENING) PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 7-11 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES March 18, 1994 TABLE 7.1 REVISED APRIL 11, 1994 COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE INVENTORY AND EVALUATION Page 1 of 2 Site/Section Number Priority Site/ Ranking Parcel Owner/Name ZoningEstimated Size (acres) Terrain Character Vegetation Type Water Features Comments 1 Yes Cray Research/Cole PD, R-1, A 120 rolling grassy meadows small wetlands Steeply sloping terrain 2 Yes Various PD 100 rolling grassy, minimal woodland water basin Former borrow pit, opportunity for water edge trail 3 No Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. LI 8 minimal grassy, lowland trees wetland Abuts Knox Lumber 4A No Trammel Crow Co. PD 17 ravine upland hardwoods -- Part of Eagan Woods PUD 4B Yes Delosh/Oldre R-1 8 rolling scattered canopy -- Abuts Highview Park, good potential for park expansion 9A ? Swenson R-4 6 bluffline mixed hardwoods ravine Attractive older farmstead, tennis court 9B No Balfavy Dev. Inc. PD 15 semi -rolling cultivated, lowland hardwoods -- Abuts Pilot Knob Park 9C No Irrthum A 20 semi -rolling cultivated, lowland hardwoods --- Abuts Quarry Park 10A Yes State of Minnesota/Burgor R-3, R-4 10 minimal moderate lowland hardwoods LeMay Lake Would complement existing parkland; facility base 10B Yes O'Hed PD 80 rolling oak hardwoods wetland Hydronic soils, attractive rolling topography 11A Yes Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. LI 220 rolling minimal upland hardwoods water basins Dramatic views, industrial edges 11B Yes Opus Prop. Inc/Et.al. LI/PD 50 rolling lowland hardwoods large water basins Great opportunity for water edge trail 12A Yes Opus Prop. Inc./Et.al. LUPD 60 rolling lowland hardwoods large water basins Great opportunity for water edge trail 12B No Jessco Inc. PD 10 semi -rolling oak woodland --- Currently for sale 13 No West Publishing Co. PD 110 rolling central hardwoods wetlands Included in approved PD plan No Various A 60 semi -rolling central hardwoods small ponds Includes single-family homes 14 15 Yes McCarthy A 30 rolling central hardwoods wetlands Potential for future trails corridor 16A Yes Sandberg/Hay A 10 lowland lowland hardwoods large wetlands Existing small home site 16B Yes Minn. Hosp. Service Assn. PD 80 rolling bluff dense hardwoods wetlands Community park potential 17A Yes Minn. Hosp. Service Assn. PD 40 rolling bluff dense hardwoods wetlands Abuts Skyhill Park, views Yes Hillcrest Dev., Et.al. R-3 15 rolling central hardwoods gravel basin Nice natural area 17B 17C Yes Hillcrest Dev., Et.al. R-3 40 rolling bluff central hardwoods wetland -seasonal Great views of valley ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7•13 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES March 18, 1994 TABLE 7.1 REVISED APRIL 11, 1994 COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE INVENTORY AND EVALUATION Page 2 of 2 Site/Section Number Priority Site/ Ranking Parcel Owner/Name Zoning Estimated Size (acres) Terrain Character Vegetation Type g Water Features Comments 21 No Bieter Co. A 140 rolling moderate central hardwoods --- Abuts Blackhawk Middle School 22A Yes McCarthy A 10 rolling emergent woody - Formerly cultivated, linear park potential 22B Yes McCarthy A 5 rolling emergent woody -- Formerly cultivated, linear park potential 23 Yes Argus Dev. Inc. R-1 90 rolling sporadic oaks wetlands Former horse pasture 24A No Various A 15 rolling lowland hardwoods wetlands Residential 24B No Various A 15 rolling lowland hardwoods wetlands Farmstead, hobby farm 25A Yes Shiela A 7 flat minimal wetland basin Logical expansion of Lakeside Park, Highline Trail ext. 25B Yes Urban R-1 7 semi -rolling cultivated, minimal abuts wetland Abuts rail corridor 28A No Various R-1 15 rolling minimal — Considered for church site 28B No Various R-1 17 rolling upland hardwoods wetlands Abuts Thomas Lake Park 28C No Thomas Lake Country Homes PD 5 rolling mixed hardwoods wetlands Outlot parcel 28D No EHW Properties RB/R-4 15 semi -rolling spruce, mixed hardwoods -- Abuts I-35E 29A No EHW Properties R-4 20 semi -rolling spruce, mixed hardwoods -- Abuts I-35E 29B Yes Boesel PD 5 semi -rolling moderate lowland hardwoods wetland basin Attractive farmstead, visible site, with good access 31 No Hilla, Inc., Et.al. (Whispering Woods site) A/R-1 65 rolling oak, upland wetlands Opportunity area for Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley 33 Yes Diamond "T" Ranch, Inc., Et.al. A 130 rolling open to wooded wetlands Stable buildings and facilities; possible county acquisition 34 Yes Ohmann Property A 5 semi -rolling moderate woodland -- Abuts Ohmann Park, farmstead site 36A Yes Holz/Middlemist R-1 7 semi -rolling scattered wetlands Farm complex, opportunity for preservation 36B Yes West End Hunting & Fishing, Et.al. PK, A, LI 35 lowland tree farm wetland basin Small tree nursery Source: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.; City of Eagan BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.15 • • • 1 TABLE 7.2 Y SITE PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA Page 1 of 2 I. NATURAL VEGETATION COVER TYPES A. Utilizing the Natural Heritage Preservation definitions outlined in their "Minnesota Native Vegetation" handbook, describe the natural community of each site. II. ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS A. Slopes plus 18% - Describe the location of any slopes on the site that exceed 18%. B. Soil - Describe the soil types of the site. C. Edges (more than one). 1. Ratio of interior to size. 2. Biological effect of parcel on surrounding land. 3. Is more buffer required to maintain parcel? (Type and size of buffer?) D. List any habitat for rare birds or animals noted on the site. E. Is area large enough to maintain representative ecological balance? F. Does site represent more than one ecological environment? G. Is there a better representative of this environmental type available for preservation within these seven parcels? H. Ecological sensitivity. Can site tolerate development without complete ecological destruction? I. Biodiversity - Present potential. Effect on site if developed for housing or commercial use. J. Water quality issues - Address any water quality issues affecting the site. III. MAINTENANCE A. Ecological restoration potential B. Maintenance practicality - Can this site be protected and maintained as adjacent sites develop? C. Maintenance recommendations - Provide a brief outline of the annual and long term maintenance required to protect this site. D. Diseased trees - Provide a statement on the health and age of the trees on the site. E. Erosion (and erosion potential). F. Sedimentation potential S3OeInOS38 7V 'fliVN TABLE 7.2 SITE PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA Page 2 of 2 IV. SIZE AND CONTENT A. Acres 1. Wetland or Prairie 2. Forest B. Is this natural community a part of a larger block of vegetation of similar structure? V. DEGREE OF HUMAN A. (Circle One) DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL COMMUNITY 1. Pristine 2. Disturbed - restoration practical 3. Disturbed - restoration not practical B. Exotics - Degree of interference with natural community. C. Compatible potential uses that do not destroy the unique natural resources: (indicate which uses are compatible on each site) 1. Hiking/walking trail 2. Cross country ski and snowshoeing 3. Nature observation - birding - wildlife 4. Nature study - education - research 5. Photography 6. Picnicking D. Describe the potential park use of each site and limitations for park use of each site. E. List any longevity concerns of the natural community that should be considered prior to a significant investment for each site. F. List presence of buildings, roads, powerlines, pipelines, etc. that affect the site. S3O8fOS3 / 7VelnlVN • • • • • • TABLE 7.3 April 15, 1994 OPEN SPACE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOP PRIORITY SITES Ecological Factors Site Considerations Existing Impacts Topography Stze Human Disturbance Slopes and topography provide visual appeal; offers views Area is large enough to maintain representative ecological Degree of human disturbance of natural community: of surrounding landscape; creates unique micro climatic or balance; area is large enough to support desired recreation - pristine habitat; allows for appropriate rec. facility development. development. • disturbed - restoration practical • disturbance - restoration not practical Soils Developable Space Generally suitable for facilities development: erosion Size and configuration of developable land is appropriate for Exotic Species potential within limitations for future recreation use/resource the development of recreation and interpretive features Degree of exotic species interference with natural protection. without unduly harming ecological diversity. community. Woodland Habitat Edges Environmental Intrusions Significant trees or woodlands on the site: good quality and Ratio of internal space to edge length; practicality of Presence of buildings, roads, power lines, pipelines. etc. that diversity of woodland communities (upland/lowland/ developing and maintaining site given the length and affect the site. first succession/old growth): presence of woodland edges configuration of edges; suitability of access to the site. adds to habitat quality. Longevity B tY Compatible Uses Any longevity concerns of the natural community that Wetland Habitat Compatible potential uses that do not unreasonably damage should be considered poor to a significant investment for Diversity in the size and character of existing wetlands: or destroy the site's unique natural resources: the site. quality of wetland edges and surrounding habitat; access to hiking/walking lakes or large ponds: status of water quahty. cross country skiing • nature observation/study Meadow/Prairie Communities • water access/fishing/surface recreation Existing oak savannah. open meadow or prairie plant • community picnicking communities; potential for restoration to natural meadow or • rustic picnicking prairie condition. • exploring/orienteering • open play Biodiversity Representative of more than one ecological community on the site; potential for restoration of ecological diversity; preservation of unique or ram habitat (or species). Ecological Sensitivity Ability of the site to withstand recreation development without an unacceptable level of resource degradation; ability of the site to be protected as adjacent sites develop. Ecological Continuity Potential of site resources to support and complement habitat in surrounding land uses. value of preserving site as a corridor for wildlife movement between adjacent sites. part of a larger aggregate of vegetation of a similar nature. S3O If?OS311 7V If1VN 7 NATURAL RESOURCES SARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT MAOAN. MN 7•SO • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES TABLE 7.4 OPEN SPACE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRIORITY SITES Site/Section Number Ecological Factors Site Considerations Topo- Wood- graphy Soils lands Wet- Meadow/ lands Prairie Biodi- versity Sensi- Conti- tivity nuity Develop - Size ability Comp. Edges Uses 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing Impacts Distur- I Exotics Intro- 1 Long- bance l sions evity ■ ■ Over. Eval. Preservation Method Comments/Future Use April 29, 1994 1,2,4,6 Open space partnership w/Cray and IGH 2 0 ■ 0 ■ 0 0 ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 2, 5 Trails and fishing access around pond 4B ■ 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 ■ ■ 2 Consider lineal trail Zink w/Highview Park 10A 0 ■ 0 ■ 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 1,4 Addition to Moonshine Park 10B ■ O ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11A ■ In ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 ■ A 2,5,7,8 Preserve resources and create passive trails ■ A 2,5,6,7,8 Interconnecting trails and greenways in development I1B ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 0 A 1,3,5 Possible future community park site (1 1 B/12A) 12A ■ ■ ■ O 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 1 0 A 1,3,5 Possible tax forfeiture acquisition (11 B/12A) 15 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ O ■ ■ A 1,5,7 Recreational trails corridor/water access 16A ■ O ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ 5 Open space preservation through easement 16B ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 2, 7, 8 Future recreational trails and tree preservation 17A ■ 0 0 O ■ 17B ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ 1,2,7,8 Consider as addition to Skyhill Park 1,2,5,7,8 Retain as future preserve and trails area 17C ■ 0 ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 B 1,2,5,7,8 Retain as future preserve and trails area 22A 22B ■ ■ 0 0 0 ■ ■ 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ O 0 0 ■ ■ ■ A A 1, 2 1, 2 Trail link between Patrick Eagan and Windcrest Parks Trails link between Patrick Eagan and Barbara Curry Parks 23 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ O ■ ■ A 2, 5, 7, 8 Create recreational trail links with adjoining parks 25A ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ A 1,2,3,5 Highline trail extension to Lakeside Park 25B O 0 ■ 0 0 0 0 0 2, 5 Trails around pond/wetland preservation 29B 0 in ■ 0 0 ■ O ■ A I,4,9 Possible historic farm site/corporate sponsorship 33 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ ■ ■ In ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 0 A 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 Recreational trails connection with Lebanon Hills/preserve riding stable/Walden Heights Park ■ 0 0 0 0 2, 5 Trails linkage between Ohmann Park and Lebanon Hills 36A ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 ■ ■ A I,4,9 Possible historic farm site/community sponsorship 14R O 0 ■ ■ 0 0 0 0 0 D 4, 5, 6, 7 Retain as future preserve/public private partnership Preservation MCV100S Evaluation Criteria Key: • = Best meets evaluation criteria = Moderately meets evaluation criteria 0 = Poorly meets evaluation criteria Overall Evaluation Key: A — Sites possessing outstanding ecological, physical, locational, or historic attributes and having the potential to offer significant long-term natural resources protection and outdoor recreation B = Sites offering good potential for preserving natural resources, providing access to watet bodies, and offering quality public outdoor recreation opportunities C = Sites having some potential to preserve or restore ecological resources and to develop recreational trails or public access to water bodies D = Sites dismissed from city acquisition but worthy of further protection of natural resources through conservation easements or site sensitive development (1) City Acquisition (2) Open Space/Trails Dedication (3) Tax Forfeiture (5) Scenic/Conservation Easement (6) Private Open Space (7) Environmental Regulation (e.g., WCA) (8) Development Sensitivity (9) Other - Specify BARTON ASCHNIAN ALEZICIAT ES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7-21 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Acquisition or Preservation Tools Tools for acquiring or preserving open space parcels within municipal units are somewhat limited as we know them today. Direct acquisition should by no means be considered as the preferred or sole means of resource preservation. Rather, the Commission and City staff should maximize existing monetary resources by incorporating various fee or preservation -based tools that can effectively and efficiently maintain resource quality. The following list is intended to assist in stimulating more creative thought and the identification of additional mechanisms. 1. Direct Acquisition - Fee title to a parcel would be obtained by direct purchase or transaction between the City and private property owner. 2. Parks Dedication - Property can be obtained through the City's mandatory dedication requirement during the development process. 3. Tax Forfeited Property - Property with delinquent taxes can be acquired if county and state procedures are adhered to. 4. Scenic/Conservation Easement - The City would, on a fee basis, purchase an easement for the scenic values of a parcel. Traditionally utilized for parkway and river corridor preservation, scenic easements can run from 10 to 90 percent of the parcel's appraised value. The property is maintained by its existing owner, however, a permanent easement is applied to the property despite subsequent transactions. Deed restrictions would also fall under this category. 5. Federal Department of Interior Endangered Species Act - Federal legislation preserving endangered species. 6. State and Local Legal Restrictions • Wetland Preservation • Floodplain Ordinances • Shoreline Setback Regulations • Tree Preservation Policies 7. Agency Wildlife Refuge Purchase - Wildlife agencies such as the Minnesota DNR, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and others may participate in direct fee purchase for refuge purposes. 8. Gift or Donation - Certain property owners may find gifting attractive from a tax purpose. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7•B3 7 NATURAL RESOURCES 9. Purchase for Preservation by a Non or Not for Profit Private Organization. 10. Private Ownership with Parcel Maintained as Open Space by mutually agreed upon management policies. 11. Private Ownership with Agreed -Upon Sensitivity to Future Development. • NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING AND EDUCATION Current Issues Programs and facilities to enable environmental learning and education are currently limited within the Eagan Park and Recreation Department. Resident demands from the developing community have been for neighborhood parks and active athletic facilities. Eagan Parks and Recreation staff currently provide limited outreach environmental learning activities to the school districts. Staff participate and lead Arbor Day functions as well as other school programs pertaining to the park system and related natural resources. Environmental learning centers in other communities and similar facilities currently meet a small portion of demands by Eagan residents. The Woodlake Nature Center, Dodge Nature Center, Pike Island at Fort Snelling, the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge Visitors Center, and Richardson Nature Center all provide facilities available to residents. However, limitations such as geography, travel time, scheduling, and finances limit resident access to these facilities. Facility Need Eagan's substantially increasing population, the impending build - out of the community, and a highly educated population suggests that future priorities must include programs and facilities for environmental learning and education. Those community populations benefitting from potential environmental education programs and facilities are varied and represent virtually all elements of the community. Eagan's schools, senior citizens, families, and environmentally oriented organizations such as the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts would have immediate benefit. Program topics, educational concepts, and facility types can be widely varied and should be tailored to the specific needs of the community. • • MARTON ASCHNMN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGANI, MN 7-R4 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES The need for facilities related to environmental learning is intensifying. Demand and related need evolves from: increasing population lengthy travel times to environmental learning centers time and program availability at existing centers rapidly expanding school population increasing senior citizen demands changing societal priorities toward environmental learning development pressures within Eagan These considerations collectively pose a real need for program and facility development. Alternative Concepts For purposes of further discussion, three basic concepts are suggested that merit further analysis and review. Each approach has distinctive strengths and weaknesses and can be accommodated by various means. These concepts should not be considered as pure initiatives as their individual philosophies can be mixed or tailored to meet Eagan's needs. Mobile Interpretive Program This concept implies a mobile, transportable program that may conduct environmental learning and education programs either on -site in outdoor classrooms, or at host populations such as senior citizen centers and schools. The concept implies little or no facility development. Instead, the interpretive program would be based upon exhibits, printed material, and other mass media productions presented by resource staff with educational backgrounds. Staffing requirements would be minimal to moderate and may range from a single part-time individual volunteer to multiple staff members. Initial capital outlay is likely to be minimal, limited to educational materials and the exhibits required. Sophisticated programs may include vehicles housing mobile exhibits and classroom tools. The mobile interpretive program could be seen as a stepping stone to a more extensive community commitment. Self Guided Environmental Leaming A second concept approach to environmental learning and education would be "on -site self -guided" tours. This concept implies a passive approach with individuals and groups utilizing educational stations laid out within park system open space and conservancy areas. Typically, a self -guided tour would interconnect outdoor viewing stations or exhibit areas supplemented by preprinted or audio information systems. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7•E6 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Potential trailhead facilities usually employ more formal exhibit space or educational elements utilizing kiosks or tailored building space. Facility development requirements may be moderate to high depending upon the sophistication and number of facilities developed. Staffing requirements for this type of program may be low to moderate with primary commitments being maintenance and operation needs once initial exhibit concepts are developed. Capital outlay for initial facilities are likely to be moderate when compared with other concept alternatives. Potential sites for self -guided walking tours are listed in Table 7.5. Interpretation walks within these areas would recognize Eagan's diverse and varied resources. These walks would also provide opportunities for guided tours, outside classes, and other organized activities. TABLE 7.5 POTENTIAL NATURE WALK LOCATIONS Park Facility Comments Patrick Eagan Park Existing and future Trails Blackhawk Park Existing trails Woodhaven Park Potential boardwalk, attractive natural environment O'Leary Park Existing trails Bur Oaks Park Exposure to wetlands, natural environment, consistent with park master plan Wescott Station Park Trails within woodland and wetland edge areas Northview Park Trails within woodland area Rahn Athletic Park Woodland trails that contribute to environmental learning Thomas Lake Park Prairie trails and outdoor classroom experiences Trapp Farm Park Floating boardwalk, bogs, and connection to Lebanon Hills Regional Park Meadowland Park Trails within woodland or wetland edges Environmental Leaming Center An environmental learning or interpretive center concept is the most sophisticated and intensive of the three approaches. Although the concept is highly variable in application, most interpretive centers will employ an outdoor education structure with indoor classrooms complemented by outdoor facilities. Building spaces are typically used for classrooms, audiovisual • BARTON ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7- Ea • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES presentations, exhibit space, and viewing areas. Staff offices and storage space are normally included. Complementary outdoor facilities may include self -guided nature walks, viewing blinds or stands, habitat exhibits, and hands-on demonstrations. The interpretive center may also serve as the hub for other communitywide environmental education programs and initiatives. Therefore, support facilities such as restrooms, amphitheaters, parking, and multiuse trails should be provided. The interpretive center concept will require a higher facility development than other concepts. Numerous variations on this theme exist within the Twin Cities and other metropolitan communities. Required staffing is also a consideration due to the level of programming and facilities to be maintained and operated. Capital outlay may range from moderate ($200,000) to high ($400,000 to $600,000) depending upon the sophistication of building exhibit space, interpretive functions, and outdoor classrooms. However, the return to the community is also expected to be the most pronounced due to the level and sophistication of material presented by the interpretive center. • NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Background and Context The uniqueness of the natural resource base is that it is not generally moveable —where it is found is where it is. To be sure, trees can be cut and replanted, prairies plowed under and then restored, or water quality returned, usually at significant cost. Eagan's resource base, while significantly altered by the march of development, needs to be considered in terms of adaptation and preservation or the opportunities will be lost forever. Natural resources can establish the character and image of a community. Many communities are noted for their management and utilization of their natural resources. Minneapolis, which through its early park efforts, proclaims itself the City of Lakes. The natural resource base enjoyed by Eagan in conjunction with a directed parks and open space system can define the City and its identity. Renovation and restoration policies can utilize what exists and piece the elements together into a cohesive urban form. Natural resources are often regarded as water, trees, terrain and occasionally as productive agricultural soils and valuable minerals. But in the broadest sense, natural resources, environmental management and cultural development meet at the park and recreation system linking people to cultural foundations and to the resource base. As the Eagan Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission sorts out its BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7-27 7 NATURAL RESOURCES responsibilities, it will obviously need to focus on the tangible aspect of building facilities and programs. However, as it does, so to can it examine those actions and their impacts or potentials within the natural resource and environmental arena. Perhaps the key is how to establish, refresh and renew the individual's spirit while reducing personal consumption. The basic physical environmental components are the hydrology (ground water, water courses, water bodies and wetlands), geomorphology (bedrock, soils and land forms); atmosphere and vegetation. Eagan's corporate boundaries are nearly coterminous with the Gun Club Lake Water Management Organization watershed. Within the watershed are approximately 320 water bodies of varying size, quality and function in seven major sub drainage areas. The glacial formation of the area created a number of geologic features consisting of hills overlooking water bodies. These unique and self-contained water bodies are fed from surface and subsurface water flows and percolating back into the aquifer. The surface water system was outlined in Chapter 2 and Figure 2.2. The water resources offer one important organizing element for the City's open space system. The City fishing guide illustrates fourteen lakes and features maps and background on four. The 21,000-acre City has identified 321 water bodies in the ten districts. Watershed designated Districts J & L in the rolling southern portion of the community contain 147 water bodies. Many of the water bodies are merely retention areas with limited recreational potential because of water quality, or in some cases size or seasonal variations in water level. Sixty-eight water bodies have been categorized as "recreation providing" for direct or indirect recreational activities because of their water quality, and others being classified as contributing to the scenic qualities or area wildlife habitat. Four hundred fifty acres make up this resource. Six lakes covering 174 acres provide direct recreational opportunities supported by sixteen lakes covering 167 acres. Eighteen water bodies have been classified scenic with the remaining twenty-eight supporting wildlife on a combined 105 acres. The Minnesota River cuts its swath along the northwest edge of the community. It is protected as part of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service refuge management area. Numerous studies are focused on the corridor and Eagan further manages adjacent land use with flood plain regulations. Along with the self contained water bodies, major river, and rolling terrain, a substantial oak savannah and big woods forest existed. Forests have particular importance in providing environmental systems, urban cooling, property value protection • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN] HAGAN, MN 7-Ra • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES and wildlife habitat. Disease, agriculture and development have taken their toll on the forest. Through the planning of the sixties, the interstate highway system was introduced to relieve congested travel corridors. The influence of early settlers traveling along the Minnesota River led to paving the trail as Highway 13. From a level, river oriented trail came the interstate highway diagonally slicing through the community, altering the terrain (in fact, at one point it proposed to bisect Blackhawk Lake) creating unusual parcels and intersections and stimulating development geared to massive suburban scale, largely single unit low density housing. Development was spread out to enjoy the terrain, woods and water bodies and in the process, severely fragmented the natural resource base. The low density uniformity of the bulk of the land devoted to housing creates reliance on private transportation, extensive conversion of land to urban purposes, increased runoff and related siltation and phosphorus infiltration into the water basins. The challenge is to work within the now fragmented Environmental Eco-system to build on what exists and capture what could be. For the most part that means policies to protect land forms; group, condense and arrange new development; integrate development with environmental features; Zink environmental resources and establish corridors; protect water courses and water bodies; control runoff and erosion; protect existing trees; remove diseased trees; restore damaged or lost ecosystems and initiate an aggressive and diverse tree replacement program. This policy base has been prepared as part of the parks and open space planning program to respond to overall natural resource and environmental system performance objectives. Issues and Considerations At the risk of oversimplifying or belaboring the point, natural resource considerations fall into a broader environmental frame- work which includes air, land and water resources along with flora and fauna and man's imprint. The important concept is ecology, the interrelationships between man and the environ- ment. The guiding policy is to make informed choices which minimize impacts that will require massive correcting in the future. The natural physical resource base primary components consist of the geomorphology, hydrology and vegetation supporting the life forms within. Because of the actions and development described earlier, the focus is on capturing and integrating the remaining remnants into a system which enhances the environmental setting and community life. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 7•E9 7 NATURAL RESOURCES The perspective is the various elements and development activities which impact the environmental components. The following table looks at environmental issues generally in the order of development generated impacts followed by day to day operating activities. These issues cover the gamut from building siting to air quality and include management aspects such as composting and solid waste disposal. Each of these issues or activity items is interrelated and overlaps relating to one or more environmental/natural resource systems. Those interrelation- ships are indicated by solid dots (•) for primary impacts and open dots (0) or circles for secondary impacts on the accompanying table. The major environmental systems and resources being considered are: • Land • Hydrology • Atmosphere • Vegetation • Wildlife • Cultural and Historical • Amenity As in any interrelated system, the importance of one element versus another is difficult to determine. Without all parts of the system in place, it is difficult to achieve desired results. On the other hand, if priorities are not established and piece meal actions are continued, progress is slowed or thwarted. Should the policy be to emphasize control of surface water flow first or to assure the quality of storm water? Both are important, but managing flows usually permits more effective water quality management measures. This plan does not purport to outline a complete set of natural resource, park, recreation and open space policies. Instead, it suggests some organizing elements and principles to guide the ongoing process of policy development. To help establish priorities in natural resource management policy and program development, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission, along with staff and City Council members, rated each identified issue or activity as to its importance in achieving City goals and effectively managing Eagan's natural resources. Those overall results are shown on the issues Table 7.6 with results of a ten point rating system shown in the rating column. The top three issues relate directly to top City initiatives: Water Quality Improvement Tree Protection/Woodland Preservation Wetland Protection • e • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 7.30 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Table 7.6 Eagan Natural Importance Parks Plan Resource Issues TLand Natural and Environmental Resource Category Water Atmoeplw. vegetation Wildlife MMtodcaU Cultural Amenity Miami; 8.77 Water Quality Management • • 8.62 Tree Preservation 0 0 0 • o 8.38 Wetland Protection • • • • o 7.54 Storm Run -Off Management 0 • 0 0 7.54 Recycling • • 7.54 Reforestation 0 0 0 • o • 7.46 Tree Disease Control 0 0 0 • 0 7.08 Composting • 7.00 Solid Waste Disposal o • 6.92 Air Quality • 6.92 Ground Cover & Landscaping o • o • 0 0 6.85 Hazardous Waste Disposal • • • 0 0 0 0 6.77 Historical Resources Protection o • 0 6.69 Soil Erosion • o 0 6.54 Cultural Resources Protection 0 • 0 6.38 Prairie Restoration 0 • • 6.15 Noise Abatement • 6.00 Street Trees o 0 • o 6.00 Fisheries Management • • 5.62 Roadway Widths, Alignment • o o • o 5.54 Structure Siting • o o o 0 5.38 Filling and Excavating • o 0 0 0 5.31 Infrastructure Installation • o 0 0 5.31 Waterbody and Bluff Setbacks 0 • 0 0 0 5.31 Public Access 0 • 0 0 5.15 Lot Configuration • 0 0 0 5.15 Water Surface Use • 5.00 Construction Soil Tracking • 0 4.92 Illegal Dumping • 0 0 4.85 Noxious & Exotic Weed Control o • 0 0 4.85 Construction Debris • 3.46 Wild Animal Control • O 3.08 Mining • O 0 O 0 RESOLUTION Inc. Barton Aschrnan Associates Moy 1p9/ • Primary Impact o Secondary Impact "BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTIENI PU►NI EAOAN. NIN 7-31 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Wetland and water quality protection activities are impacted by state and federal policies and regulations. While these initiatives have been undertaken at the state and federal level, most regulation administration remains local. As plans for wetlands and surface water management are prepared and put in place, the City can opt to be the responsible government unit. Environmental systems need to be coordinated across political boundaries. Local governments could provide the major implementing cohesiveness because of their unique role in guiding, regulating and implementing land use decisions. The next tightly grouped issues included: • Storm Run-off Protection • Recycling • Reforestation • Tree Disease Control The addition of recycling represents an interesting priority. Waste reduction, reuse and recycling has more of an indirect impact on land use and water quality, but reflects the recognition that you must work with the source or cause of environmental degradation rather then trying to clean-up the aftermath. Twelve issues are grouped rather closely in the middle of the issues list in the following order: • Composting • Solid Waste Disposal • Air Quality Management • Ground Cover and Landscaping • Hazardous Waste Disposal • Historical Resource Preservation • Soil Erosion Protection • Cultural Resource Preservation • Prairie Restoration • Noise Abatement • Street Tree Planting and Maintenance • Fisheries Management At the bottom of the priority rating were: • Illegal Dumping Control • Noxious Weed Control • Construction Debris Management • Wild Animal Control • Mining Regulations and Reclamation In part, these areas represent areas of little complaint or activity and hence satisfaction, and in part reflect in place programs and • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 7-32 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES regulations which have been effective, or the problem simply is not relevant or needing attention. Program and Performance Policy Framework The public role and particularly the local government role in natural resource and environmental protection is broad, complex and often in conflict. Effective program and performance policy strategies must be comprehensive, long range, fiscally responsible, environmentally sound and relate to the broad objectives of the community and metropolitan area. An effective traffic management strategy has historically rested on the three "E's"— engineering, education, and enforcement. Adapting that context to natural resources and park and open space policies results in a suggestion for organizing policies around "EERIE" considerations. "EERIE" is of Scottish derivation meaning something between mysterious and timid —in fact, an apropos description of an environmental program. "EERIE" stands for : • Environmental Engineering • Education and Engagement • Reasonable Regulation • Investments and Implementation • Economics and Enrichment Environmental Engineering - Environmental engineering (or planning) is directed to establishing the facts and providing essential baseline and background data. For example, a public right-of-way tree replacement program would ask a number of questions. What is the street tree inventory? What does the street tree inventory portray in terms of quantity, spacing and species diversity? What development practices impact natural resource and environmental conditions? This component of the policy framework, in addition to building understanding, creates a platform for establishing appropriate recognition of responsibilities. Education and Engagement - Protection and reinvestment in the resource base is being increasingly recognized for its contribution to land values, avoidance of future major and costly remedial actions, leisure enjoyment, and general health benefits. Engaging the community, its residents, land owners, investors and employers in this cause can establish a recognition and cooperative venture which would reduce costs and increase protection without major public expenditures or onerous regulations. Reasonable Regulations - Policies can be as important as definitive regulations. Clearly establishing what the community BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.33 7 NATURAL RESOURCES expects and how that benefits existing and future residents and development proposals when coupled with education and engagement efforts can pay more dividends than extensive regulations. Responsible regulations establish the safety net, the basis for discussion. However, regulations without the triple E's (engineering, education and enforcement) are not likely to succeed. Regulation without understanding creates unusual results. Further, regulation which has the effect of reducing property values or rendering the property unable to be used could constitute an "illegal" taking and require compensation. More and more property rights challenges are successful, raising huge financial issues for communities. The need to connect regulation for the public health, safety, and general welfare becomes increasingly important. As noted elsewhere, regulations must increasingly be formulated to meet specific public benefit without depriving a land owner of economic benefits. Investments and Implementation - To make anything happen, human and financial capital must be deployed. Identifying beneficiaries and investors is important to successful implemen- tation. For example, as Eagan has done, employers may want not only to provide open space but to establish facilities for athletic teams. Coordinating and leveraging investments are beneficial to both parties. Or, the City takes the necessary steps to assure environmental clearances to attract development investors. Implementation also requires adding the "who" will be responsible to the desired action agenda and what will it cost to maintain. Economics and Enrichment - Costs are generally quantifiable in the currency measure of our times —money. Benefits are often not able to be reduced to monetary values. Environmental costs of filling a wetland for a road versus rerouting around the wetland can be compared. However, it is more difficult to quantify the monetary value of not altering the wetlands. Until that disparity improves, it is important to remember that economic considerations are important to natural resource protection. So the flip of costs in the economic equation is enrichment. As mentioned earlier, land form, vegetation, water bodies, water courses, and other environmental and resource features are positively impacting and enriching property values. Environmental and Natural Resource Management Objectives A working set of objectives is proposed as a starting point for developing policies which relate the environmental and natural resource systems. In many cases, these objectives are basic common sense. The challenge comes in methods to achieve, • • • BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 7-34 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES trade-offs to be made, and costs to be incurred. Nonetheless, developing a common set of ground rules can sharpen policies and action choices. BEDROCK GEOLOGY/SOILS/TOPOGRAPHY Protect mineral resources. Protect against soil contamination. Protect against erosion. Promote use of adequate structural requirements. Assure appropriate utilization for on site sanitary disposal. Protect significant physical features (overlooks, bluffs, steep slopes) from grade changes that destroy their character. Protect agricultural lands. HYDROLOGY - SUBSURFACE/SURFICIAL Protect water quality. Protect aquifer recharge areas/sources. Manage ground water appropriation. Eliminate flooding of improved or developed areas. Protect rivers, streams, drainage courses, wetlands, ponds and lakes. ATMOSPHERIC Protect air quality —gases and particulates. • Protect noise quality. • Protect wind sites. • Assure solar access. VEGETATION Protect significant forests and trees from removal. Protect forests and vegetation from disease. Replant trees. Protect prairie and grasslands. Restore natural vegetative ecosystems and linkage between these. Protect and provide wildlife habitat. AMENITIES Provide adequate park land, open space and trails. Protect against visual intrusion with buildings, utilities, land form and vegetation, alteration, signage, lighting, etc. Interpret natural systems for enlightenment and resource oriented practices. Provide streetscaping or boulevard planting. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.36 7 NATURAL RESOURCES ARCHEOLOGY/HISTORICAL • Protect significant archeological and historical buildings, features and sites. WILDLIFE/HABITAT • Protect and restore wildlife habitat. • Protect and restore fisheries. Current and Future Natural Resource Programs Some additional elaboration on the current elements of the City's natural resource program efforts leads to potential additional programs, program revisions, or action agenda and preliminary policies. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (A planning and design solution process) As noted in the overview, establishing a planning process which collects and analyzes appropriate data, establishes goals and objectives, determines needs, evaluates alternatives, proposes solutions and establishes implementing actions converts notions to factually based strategies. Part of the prioritization process allows the level of information and analysis to be commensurate with the significance of the issue. For example, developing site parking policies for the parks may not require multiple day occupancy counts, but rather a user end program manager assessment from actual experience. Environmental engineering and planning efforts underway or completed include: • Comprehensive Plan Update • Downtown Eagan Development Analysis • Water Resources Management Plan • Parks and Open Space System Plan • Storm Water Management Plan • Trails System Plan • Parks Maintenance Management Plan EDUCATION AND ENGAGEMENT The thrust of this component of the policy development process is to establish and reinforce private accountability. The focus here is establishing an informed and rational basis for acting responsibly. Specific facility and program recommendations are discussed elsewhere. However, it is important to recognize and expand on • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 7-36 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES these programs. For instance, the State has mandated an environmental curriculum in the schools. In addition to providing interpretive areas, the City could be involved with curricular development and even spin-off community projects as a result. Coupling City resource efforts with educational programs could expand a broader partnering process. Extending those programs into adult and community education programs are worthy of consideration as well. Other programs in place to engage and educate the community include: • Arbor Day programs • Earth Week programs • Public school education programs (Arbor Day poster contest, Toadilly Turtle) • Public information and brochures (e.g. "Eagan Fishing Guide"; "Protecting Eagan Oak Trees") • Composting program • Oak wilt disease program • Forester tree inspections and educational programs • Tree sales • Recycling • Citywide clean-up program • Nature programs It would be appropriate to consider an ad hoc advisory panel of landowners, developers, businesses, neighborhood represen- tatives, staff and Commission members to share understanding of resource protection and establish educational programs. Reasonable Regulations The City has adopted, or is considering adopting a package of natural resource and environmentally based regulations including: EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS • Land Use Zoning Regulations • Subdivision Regulations • Tree Preservation Guidelines • Turf Grass, Meadow and Woodland Regulations • Park Dedication Policy and Regulations (1994) • Trail Dedication Policy and Regulations (1994) • Flood Plain Regulation Shoreland Zoning • Weed Regulations • Nutrient Pond Dedication Requirements • Water Surface Use Zoning Regulations • Water Quality Policies BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 7.37 7 NATURAL RESOURCES Local regulations, in part, enact regulations and requirements of the state and federal government. The overlay of these environmental regulations thickens the quilt of efforts to retain or regain environmental balance. OTHER AGENCY REGULATORY ROLES WMO/City • Wetlands Conservation Act Department of Natural Resources • Shoreland Minimum Standards • Flood Plain Minimum Standards • Public Waters Regulations • Wild and Scenic Rivers • Water Appropriation • Changes to Public Waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Public Water and Wells • Water, Air and Land Resource Purity • Noise Abatement • Clean Air Act Administration • Water Quality Monitoring • Indirect Source Permitting • Water Pollution Control Act Permitting • Ground Water Protection • Wetland Filling With Corps of Engineers Under CWA 404 Minnesota Environmental Quality Board • Environmental Worksheets • Environmental Impact Statements Corps of Engineers • Navigable Waters Permitting • Wetland Regulation • Fill and Dredging Permitting Fish and Wildlife Service • Wildlife Habitat Management Dakota County • Solid Waste Management • Land Fill Regulations • Back-up Shoreland Regulations Regulations have frequently been viewed as a panacea. Pass a law and improvements will occur. It has already been pointed out that there is a need to relate values and objectives to benefits. Regulations are an important part of the package, but must be carefully considered. The ability to regulate natural • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN! EAGAN, MN 7-351 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES resource protection lies in the ability to directly link natural resource protection to public health, safety and general welfare. The public nuisance (weeds, noise) justification also has some justification and support The importance of linkage cannot be overstated. The First English Evangelical Lutheran Church case, even though a compensation case, found that a taking, even temporary, was compensable. Along with the Nollan case, also in California, regarding special use conditions, the court found that the proposed regulatory condition had to relate to the request and its impacts, not something else that would be nice to accomplish. And finally, the recent Lucas case found (in the extreme) that when public regulation denies all economically beneficial or productive use of land, compensation is required. Returning to the point that costs are relatively easy to calculate while benefits are not, without some basic standard of performance, that finding reinforces the need to build linkages, understanding and acceptance. The concept that parks and natural resources are beneficial components of urban life is reinforced by the Minnesota Elwell law which allows special assessment for park improvements because they benefit property, and the Collis case in Bloomington which upheld dedication of park land when subdivisions create demand. Therefore, the context of natural resources can best be examined in the broadest framework. Typically, localities are concerned with natural resources related to vegetation, water quality and mining activities, which for the most part, are not relocatable. The parks plan urges consideration of all of the programmatic elements of a successful policy strategy (engineering, engagement, regulation, investment and economics). The challenges of the regulatory process (beyond the property rights questions) are to somehow rationalize the necessary overlap of functions and jurisdictions. The natural resource issues list responds extensively to the development and redevelopment process. Having secured that protection frontier, the focus must also address operations which are primarily consumption and disposal issues. Therefore, it may be appropriate to keep the major categories of the natural resource/environmental systems in mind when considering the regulatory framework: • Bedrock/Soils/Topography • Hydrology - Subsurface/Surficial • Atmospheric ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7.39 7 NATURAL RESOURCES • Vegetation • Wildlife/Habitat • Amenities • Archeological/Historical • Waste Management • Typology In fact, it may be appropriate to develop a comprehensive index of regulations, ordinances which contain environmental regulations and policies, and environmental systems. A couple of examples may serve to illustrate the point. Every development activity requires a permit, but not necessarily a universal permit. Not all lands have to be subdivided. The subdivision regulations provide for landscaping and dedication of ponds, park land, etc. The zoning code establishes a landscaping policy for virtually all improvements and develop- ment except for single family. Are the requirements consistent? How do they relate to the woodland preservation policies? The disease prevention policies, etc? While beyond the scope of this effort, many policies and regulations have been adopted and placed into the primary, most appropriate regulation base. They need to be codified and related to companion measures to assure understanding and consistency and reduce complexity. The overall coverage of Eagan's regulatory framework is reasonably complete. Spelling out interrelationships, connecting supporting policies and updating regulations need attention. The key is to define the context in which these actions are occurring (plan), the appropriate guidelines for development and protection, an institutionalized process, and the appropriate technical skills and review process. One of the most notable aspects of the development planning process is the recognition of the trade-offs involved. Therefore, from an internal management viewpoint, it is important to coordinate all technical input from the various departments and place it within the context of the community. Advisory commission review of development proposals is important. The number of reviews is governed by the logistical and time considerations involved. Each permit application needs to be screened to determine the appropriate technical route to follow. Review of permit applications for environmental concerns can continue as a technical and citizens review process which forwards its comments to the planning commission or other permitting department for synthesis with other findings. Investment and Implementation Financing and specific investments are covered in slightly more detail in a separate chapter. The thrust of public financial • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7-40 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES investments is to connect, protect and restore a system of natural resources. That includes investments in inventories and plans, education, land and facilities, site improvement programs and joint ventures. Much of the natural resource and environmental investments will be targeted to educational and enforcement programs with some emphasis on land acquisition as outlined earlier in the chapter. Some investments not mentioned elsewhere that have been made to date include: • Long range park recreation and open space plan • Central area plan • Resource inventories • Public water access • Public water fish management • Street and park tree replacement program • Park and trail acquisition/dedication • Prairie management (Thomas Lake) • Composting site A number of implementation programs and actions are recom- mended for consideration. For each to be accomplished, it should first be evaluated as to appropriateness for consideration. For those actions which are retained, they need to become SMART: Specific Measurable Achievable Responsibility accepted Time frame specific Natural Resource Implementation Program Actions The following implementation actions touch all aspects of the EERIE process and encompass actions in all of the natural resource/environmental system components. They could be organized or classified in any number of ways. These implementing actions bridge the process to the policy discussions which concludes this chapter. 1. Adopt park, recreation and open space plan. 2. Conduct comprehensive, ongoing public awareness and education program. 3. Acknowledge and document system benefits 4. Initiate necessary background inventories and analyses. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 7-41 7 NATURAL RESOURCES 5. Implement priority natural resource, open space and acquisition recommendations. 6. Review and update regulatory policies and procedures. 7. Formalize land owner/developer panel. 8. Integrate and streamline development review process: • Planning Commission • Park Recreation and Natural Resource Commission • Other Agencies • Staff 9. Strengthen Inter -Departmental Administrative Review Process. • Land use and subdivision • Park and open space • Public safety • Infrastructure • Environmental • Natural Resource 10. Evaluate City Design Standards. • Right-of-way use • Pavement width and alignment requirements • Parking requirements and procedures • Parking space dimensions 11. Clarify administrative and policy decision levels affecting natural resource related actions. 12. Expand school based environmental education programs. 13. Establish environmental education program serving youths and adults. 14. Reinforce and expand park and open space interconnections. 15. Emphasize and promote environmental corridors. 16. Interpret historical, current and planned natural and cultural resources. 17. Establish neighborhood oriented environmental teams. Water management and monitoring • Tree and ground cover planting • Educational and recreational events • Woodland and meadow restoration • 411 • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN) EAGAN, MN 7.42 • • • 7 NATURAL RESOURCES 18. Coordinate natural resource and park planning with regional agencies. 19. Evaluate investment potentials: • Street trees • Park trees/vegetation • Corridor acquisition • Wetland acquisition/restoration • Natural heritage/open space areas • Historical and cultural resources • Environmental education center • Community recreation/socialization • Natural resource based recreation facilities 20. Engage in private involvement/investment. 21. Establish natural resource coordination efforts with larger commercial and industrial uses and land owners. 22. Establish policies for developing biodiversity and eco- system protection in parks, open space and private lands. 23. Identify financing sources and options for land acquisition and natural resource improvement programs. 24. Adopt previously recommended natural landscape ordinance. 25. Focus reforestation efforts on major transportation corridors. 26. Implement oak resource protection ordinances and restoration of oak woodlands through reforestation. 27. Adopt and implement Dakota County Groundwater Protection Plan elements. 28. Revise and reinforce erosion control policies and enforcement on construction and building sites. 29. Implement comprehensive vegetation strategy: • Connecting corridors • Street tree planting • Shade tree disease inspection, removal and replacement • Tree preservation • Landscape plans • Woodland and meadow restoration • Urban forest management plan 30. Review City development standards for design parameters. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 7.43 7 NATURAL RESOURCES BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN. MN 7.44 • • • Tr a i I System Plan CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 8 TRAILS CHAPTER 8: TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN • INTRODUCTION Trails are an important element of the Eagan Park System. They provide the backbone of the open space system by interconnecting the community's parks. This section examines the development of the trail system, user feedback, trails as transportation, recreational uses, and the system's hierarchy. Design standards and guidelines for trail development are contained within the Appendix section. • HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEM Existing trail development within Eagan is primarily an outgrowth of the community's park and trail system planning conducted in 1982. This plan emphasized the development of trails along major and minor arterials and collector streets within the community. Implementation has generally followed roadway construction or reconstruction for reasons of economy and residential development patterns. The 1982 park system plan envisioned a trail system primarily paralleling arterials and streets for the following reasons: 1. Trails would Zink various areas of the city along a very direct alignment. 2. Existing right-of-way is usually available for development of a trail system. 3. There are economic benefits of developing trails along with the construction of vehicular thoroughfares. 4. Bicycle trails, in particular, can be constructed at more suitable grades. 5. The acceptance of trails in residential areas is better along thoroughfares than along rear yards or at other isolated locations. 6. Crossings of thoroughfares can be better accommodated with traffic controls that exist or are planned with the development of thoroughfares. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 41•1 8 TRAILS A number of exceptions to the road right-of-way trail system exist. The City has developed a "high line" trail corridor that conforms to utility right-of-way aligned in east -west orientation in the vicinity of Wilderness Run Road. Limited trail connections through residential areas in an off-street alignment occur primarily for the purpose of connecting parks with the road right- of-way trail system. Off -road trails also exist within many of the community's neighborhood community parks and schools providing loops for walking and recreation purposes. System Goals Eagan's trail system has, as a result, largely embraced the following goals: 1. Provide a coordinated trail system of state, county, and local trails that meet the recreational and transportation needs of the citizens of Eagan. 2. Develop a citywide trail system that minimizes potential conflicts between trail users and motor vehicles and ensures the safety of the trail users. 3. Coordinate trails system connections with adjacent communities. 4. Develop a one mile to one and one-half mile trail segment per year. 5. Wherever possible, segregate incompatible trail uses (such as in -line skating and recreational walking). 6. In an effort to minimize trail construction costs, trails are to be constructed in conjunction with state and county trail improvements. 7. Educate citizens on proper use, operation, and safety rules governing trail use. 8. Encourage the private sector to provide trail recreational opportunities for specialized uses (such as in -line skating). 9. Encourage the private sector to assist the City in the provision of trail support facilities. The vast majority of existing trail construction has been eight - foot wide bituminous trail. Five to six-foot wide concrete sidewalks often accompany bituminous trails on the opposing side of the roadway. These sidewalks are used for neighborhood linkages and neighborhood to park linkages. In addition, limited lengths of ten -foot wide bituminous trails exist • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN B•B • • • 8 TRAILS primarily to service community parks or other heavily used areas. Resulting trail use has primarily been pedestrian and bicycle traffic. However, other hard surface trail modes such as in -line skating are rapidly increasing, in turn causing conflicts and competition for space with the more traditional bicycle and pedestrian users. Trends toward more substantial multiuse of trail corridors will continue. Future trail development and ongoing facility operations must accommodate the need for increased width, safety signing, defined gradient parameters, and flexible surfaces. Through the implementation of the original trail plan, more than 80 miles of trails have been built along county roads, city streets, and in city parks. In an effort to continue local financing of the program, the City has established a trails dedication fund and a five-year trails maintenance program. • TRAIL DEDICATION To more adequately assure the timeliness and priority of the completion of segments of the trail system, the City Council has resolved that as a prerequisite to plat approval, subdividers shall dedicate land for trails and/or shall make cash contributions to the City's park trail fund. The Park Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Commission recommends to the City Council the trail land dedication and/or cash contributions for the proposed subdivision. Also, when a proposed trail has been indicated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and it is located in whole or in part within the proposed plat, it shall be designated as such on the plat and shall be dedicated to the City of Eagan. • COMMUNITY FEEDBACK REGARDING TRAILS Community feedback regarding the trail system has occurred at several different times employing different techniques. These samplings were intended to identify user patterns and trends, user demographics, and problems resulting from design, operations, and maintenance. General feedback from the surveys suggest that: • Most users are bicyclists or pedestrians. Surveys did not identify more progressive modes such as in -line skating are increasing. However, this may be explainable, in part, by the recent emergence of in -line skating. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 13-3 8 TRAILS • Recreation and exercise were the primary use objectives with a minor use for transportation purposes. • Respondents desire longer length trails on independent alignments providing more park -like experiences. • Trails are well maintained, however, multi -season use should be considered. A community survey by the polling firm of Decision Resources Limited, in 1988, provided insight regarding the entire park and recreation system. Respondents indicated high participation percentages of bicycling, walking, and jogging occasions. Cross country skiing and snowmobiling participation was substantially lower. In -line skating and equestrian uses were not available to the respondents. The same survey rated the entire trail system. Nineteen percent of the respondents rated the trail system excellent and 46 percent rated it good. Approximately half of the respondents utilized trails on a regular basis and 63 percent rated trail maintenance as excellent or good. During May 1988, an on -site survey of trail users was conducted by staff interns. The survey indicated, in contrast to an earlier 1981 survey, a higher percentage of female users (57 percent female versus 43 percent male), an increased age of trail users, and a substantial increase in walkers using the trail facilities. For example, of the 475 users observed during the survey, 49 percent were bicyclists, 37 percent were walkers, the other 14 percent were joggers or another mode. Of those interviewed, 41 percent were using trails for exercise, 18 percent for recreation, 18 percent for transportation, and 23 percent for recreation/ exercise. Of those individuals surveyed, 58 percent stated they had no dislikes with the Eagan trails. Constructive comments received included extended use into winter seasons, debris or surface issues (better surfaces for in -line skating), need for longer trails, and intersection crossings. In May 1990, a similar field survey was conducted of 101 trail users along Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road. During the 50-hour study, 300 trail users were observed and every third person interviewed. Eighty-five percent of those interviewed were Eagan residents, 58 percent male and 42 percent female. Average distance traveled by the trail users was 3.6 miles with the range occurring between 1 and 13 miles. Of those interviewed, 54 percent were walking, 37 percent biking, and the remainder were jogging or another mode. Primary reason for using the trails included 35 percent as exercise and recreation, 36 percent as exercise only, 11 percent as recreation only, and 17 percent as transportation only. Individuals appreciated the • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 SAGAN, MN B•4 • • • 8 TRAILS paved trails, off -road safety, and scenery. The vast majority, 81 percent, had no comment as to aspects of the trails they disliked. Eight percent felt the trails were too close to busy roads, 5 percent commented on lack of winter plowing, and others commented on the need for additional independent alignment. In December 1993, as a part of this park system plan update, a focus group exercise solicited broad comment regarding park and recreation viewpoints from a wide variety of users and perspectives. Pertaining to trails, the participants commented on their general satisfaction with the existing trail system. Comments which were received, however, suggested a lack of trail continuity, the need for additional neighborhood to community trail linkages, and a strong desire for additional off - road trail corridors offering a higher quality recreation and nature experience. Individuals also desired looping trails within parks and within the trail system. Feedback from surveys such as those previously summarized provide an important component in guiding trail development toward a mature system. The City should continue to provide regular interviews of trail users as a means of establishing user trends and to provide a historical perspective. However, it is equally important to obtain comments and feedback from community residents currently not using the system. Trails typically rank as one of the most popular recreation facilities within the park system. Moderate users and those not utilizing the trail system offer viewpoints that should be sought to obtain a balanced system. In June 1994, a community meeting was convened to examine Eagan's existing and proposed trail plan. General concerns voiced at the meeting included: • improved linkages between residential subdivisions should be strived for • additional trail access to Lebanon Hills Regional Park is desireable • the Town Centre area is considered inaccessible by trail users interest exists for winter snow removal from trails • facilities are needed for bike parking at both commercial and public buildings YARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN Y•6 8 TRAILS ■ REGIONAL TRAILS County Trails Plan Dakota County has worked with the cities to develop bikeways since the early 1980s. The County Bikeway Plan utilizes the following elements: 1. The County Bikeway System: All bikeways which are designated by the County in accordance with the County Bikeway Plan. 2. Bikeway: Facilities which are in some manner specifically designed as being open to bicycles and other forms of non - motorized travel. 3. Bike Path: An off -road bikeway, physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic, for the exclusive use of non - motorized traffic including skaters, bicyclists, and pedestrians. 4. Bike Lane: A portion of the roadway designated by striping, signing, curbing, or pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicycles. 5. Regional Trail Plan: A system of regional trail corridors that provide for recreational trail activities in linear resources, by connecting and providing access to regional park sites. Dakota County's Role Many of Eagan's trails have been developed with the assistance of Dakota County. County money has been, and will continue to be, a primary resource for trail development. Intercommunity planning also is conducted by the County. Specific County responsibilities include: 1. The planning, design, construction, and funding of the County Bikeway System. 2. Input into state and local road and bikeway planning efforts. 3. The planning and implementation of bikeways within parks and regional trail corridors. 4. Oversight of local governments in the routine maintenance of off -road paths on the County Bikeway System. The County has direct responsibility for the maintenance of paved shoulders on the County Bikeway System which is coordinated by the Office of Planning and the Highway Department. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•B • • 8 TRAILS 5. Foster partnerships between the County, cities in Dakota County, local units of government outside of Dakota County, and state agencies to plan and implement bikeways that cross jurisdictional lines to promote regional bikeway transportation system. Further, to both seek support for Dakota County grant proposals and to support partnership agencies in grant proposals to achieve a regional bikeway system. Dakota County has been awarded a grant under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) to provide safety, directional, and information signage on the County Bikeways System which will include certain areas within Eagan. An element of the grant includes citizen input in the form of using a postcard system to inform the County of maintenance or low cost improvements to enhance bicycle safety and access. The ISTEA legislation opened new funding categories for transportation and enhancements. Bikeways are eligible for this funding source. Grant applications will be completed by the Office of Planning or in conjunction with the Highway Department or Parks Department as project warrant. Planning/Coordination Dakota County plays a major role in the development of a coordinated system of bikeways in the County. The County is responsible for developing a bikeway capital improvement program (CIP) which identifies the schedule for constructing County bikeways. Local communities will have an opportunity each year to suggest changes to the CIP of the County Bikeway System. It is also important for local communities to keep the County informed of development projects for local bikeways. To do this in an efficient manner, the City of Eagan and Dakota County should establish a joint trails planning team to coordinate long-range trails system planning and implementation efforts. Financing the County Trails System Dakota County has provided funds for bikeways in conjunction with County road projects, whenever appropriate. The County has also taken a lead role in applying for grants from both state and federal sources. The 100% County funding contribution for bikeways is intended to assure a source of funds so that a basic framework for a coordinated County Bikeway System can be accomplished. Although cities are not required to provide funds for construction of County bikeways, they have agreed through a Joint Powers Agreement to maintain the bikeways that are built with County funds. Cities are encouraged to continue the development of local bikeways that can augment the County BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B.7 8 TRAILS system. Cities will be responsible for funding the development of local bikeways, as well as maintaining County bikeway segments in their jurisdiction. These maintenance activities include seal coating, crack filling, patching, mowing, and trails/ boulevard sweeping. Regional Trails and Intercommunity Connections Eagan has contributed to and supported the Dakota County Trail System Development. This system primarily employs roadway corridor trails separated from vehicle traffic. However, other regional trails development is important to provide community access to regional destinations. Potential destinations include Fort Snelling State Park, the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, the Minneapolis Parkway System, and other regional destinations. Specific connections that would be instrumental in providing regional access are discussed below: 1. Eagan has been awarded an ISTEA Grant to link Eagan to trails in Fort Snelling State Park and the Minnesota Valley Refuge and State Trail via Silver Bell Road and Nichols Road. With the addition of a trailhead and kiosk area, this trail connection will provide an important link to the regional open space represented within the Minnesota River Valley area. This is considered the City's top priority for intercommunity trail connections. 2. The Soo Line Railroad Corridor extending north into Mendota Heights from Eagan represents an integral corridor which would connect residents of Northern Dakota County with the Minneapolis Parkway System. Destinations such as Minnehaha Falls, Lake Nokomis, and the Mississippi River Corridor could be reached through this future trail. Intercommunity linkages would also be provided by the railroad corridor extending south into Rosemount and east into Inver Grove Heights. Mufti -community alliances and county involvement will be important to preserving the railroad right-of-way when and if abandonment takes place. 3. Improved access to Lebanon Hills Regional Park and the regional open space that it represents should be strived for. Access points could be considered from Dodd Road, Cliff Road, Galaxie Avenue, Ohman Park, and the Soo Line Corridor. 4. Connections via Lone Oak, Cliff, Diffley, Yankee Doodle, and Dodd Roads into adjacent communities should be sought (i.e., Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, Apple Valley, Burnsville). • • BARTON AWHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN S-p • • 8 TRAILS 5. Development of trails along state highway corridors including Highways 3, 149, 55, and 13 should be pursued by the County and City through Mn/DOT. • TRANSPORTATIONAL TRAILS Principal Issues Eagan's current trail system and those additions planned for paralleling major roadways provide an effective means of connecting residential areas with logical community destinations. These destinations include the community's school system, access to parks, and linkages to primary retail and commercial areas. Although select links may be missing, critical trail segments are planned for transportation purposes and should continue to be implemented on an incremental basis consistent with roadway improvements. Principal transportation issues that the trail system must respond to include: 1. Access into the Town Centre commercial area for retail goods and services exists on those trails that parallel the major roadways. However, internal circulation within Town Centre is restricted to limited sidewalks or the area's narrow roadways. Providing off -road trails or on -street bike lanes will be difficult due to the narrow roadways and restricted right-of-way (e.g., along Town Centre Drive). This issue can only be solved as a part of a broader transportation plan that examines other vehicle circulation issues within the Town Centre area. Integration of trails into a Town Centre loop road system would enable improved commercial area access. 2. Improved access and trail continuity into the community's northeastern industrial area is important if the trails are to provide a valid transportation function for affected employees. A survey of businesses in this area may be helpful in determining whether a need currently exists for employees desiring to commute by nonmotorized modes. Trails could respond to both commuter and noon or break exercise needs. 3. Principal roadway corridors including I-35E and Highway 77 pose barriers to trail users especially children and the elderly. These corridors force users onto those trails paralleling major streets with difficult intersection crossings and high traffic volumes. Additional trail crossings of the I-35E corridor would be expensive and difficult to develop. However, new crossings should be pursued as roadway and bridge improvements are made. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SAGAN, MN 0.9 8 TRAILS 4. Additional intercommunity connections should be strived for to promote trail use from abutting cities and residential areas. These connections should evolve through both county and community initiatives. Trails as Transportation: A Cultural Change Minimal trail system use for transportation functions may be the principal issue facing Eagan's trail system from a transportation viewpoint. Eagan is a suburb. Its residents largely adhere to an automobile accessible culture for commuting and family transportation needs. Past user surveys indicate the vast majority of trail activities are recreation or exercise oriented rather than transportation. In fact, fewer than one in five user trips on those occasions surveyed indicated a transportation purpose. Similar to most rapidly growing American suburbs, Eagan is highly oriented towards vehicles for commuting, family events, and conducting day-to-day family business. Eagan's trail system should, however, be considered as an integral element to the community's transportation plan and as a resource for contributing to the community's transportation needs. An honest cultural change must exist if Eagan trails are to play a justifiable role in the community's transportation framework. The 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) establishes a federal mandate to examine and employ muttimodal approaches and reduce America's reliance on its highway and street system. Eagan's existing and proposed trail system is well suited to meet the community's transportation needs. It can only be effective, however, if the following basic principal's are adhered to. 1. The city must follow through with the remainder of the planned street corridor trails to establish a system which is predictable and establishes route continuity. 2. Connections with adjacent communities must be strived for along with regional corridor connections. 3. Future development in Eagan should be accessible via trail system. This includes retail, services, office, and other commercial development. Similarly, other community public investments such as the YMCA, schools, and other institutions must be accessible by trails. Each of these developments should also be required to provide convenient and safe bicycle parking facilities. 4. Cultural change can only occur through education and public awareness. City staff including all departments must • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAOAN. MN ■•10 • • • 8 TRAILS present a unified educational program involving seminars, school presentations, and brochures informing the public as to the transportation benefits of community trails. The return for this investment could be a multimodal community with moderating traffic issues and increased community accessibility for people of all ages and interests. 5. A comprehensive trail signage system should be developed to coordinate and establish sign consistency. • RECREATIONAL TRAILS Principal Issues Responses obtained from recent user survey community forums indicate strong preference for a recreation and exercise -based trail experience. Comments received indicated a desire for trails on off -road independent alignments that provide an enhanced park experience and better exposure to the communities natural resource base. This criticism indicates the principal weakness of the community's current recreational trail system. Off -road, independent trail alignments do exist but to a limited degree and with minimal continuity. Attention should be focused on preserving those remaining off -road trail opportunities to provide an enhanced linkage between existing parks, maximizing exposure to the community's natural resource base, and improving trail continuity for longer recreational excursions. As shown on Figure 8.1, numerous independent trail corridors can be strived for capitalizing upon existing investments and future opportunities. These corridors include: 1. A potential trail corridor interconnecting O'Leary, Barbara Curry, Fish Lake, Patrick Eagan, and the Lexington-Diffley site (utilizing existing trails, potential linear parks, and parcels) is an area currently void of development. This north -south system provides a central access from which adjacent trails paralleling major roadways and linking to other parks can be developed. Furthermore, the system would interconnect with the Highline Trail corridor with its east -west alignment. 2. Independent alignments should be strived for in the northwest and northeast quadrants of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road as development occurs. Access to and interconnections between industrial areas should occur. 3. Additional trail linkages through parks interconnecting with existing road corridor trails should be strived for. This approach provides for trail continuity by employing both BARTON ASCI-IIMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 111.11 8 TRAILS roadway corridor and off -road linear parks or trails within existing parks. The net result is an enhanced trail experience that breaks up trail user exposure to automobile traffic. 4. An enhanced independent alignment trail system should employ trailheads for improved community access and family participation. Trailheads could be developed at Thomas Lake, Trapp Farm, Rahn, and Patrick Eagan Parks as a means of interfacing with the trails. Trailheads can be developed simply as small parking areas, informational kiosks and signing, along with comfort facilities for trail users. Nature Trails An expanded system of nature trails, those sites which provide looping pedestrian trails within the park or natural environment, would also enhance community recreational, and exercise opportunities. Walkway surfaces can be made from a wide variety of materials including bituminous, compacted aglime, and wood chips. Material selection is contingent upon the adjacent environment, construction difficulty, the amount of trail use, maintenance access, and potential soil problems. Table 8.1 identifies potential sites where nature walks could be developed within Eagan. • • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN Y•'I>? • • • 8 TRAILS TABLE 8.1 POTENTIAL NATURE TRAIL LOCATIONS Park Facility Opportunity Patrick Eagan Park Future Trails Blackhawk Park Existing and future trails Woodhaven Park Potential boardwalk, attractive natural environment O'Leary Park Existing trails Bur Oaks Park Exposure to wetlands and natural environment, consistent with park master plan Wescott Station Park Trails within woodland and wetland edge areas Northview Park Trails within woodland area Rahn Athletic Park Trails that contribute to environmental learning Thomas Lake Park Prairie walks and outdoor classroom experiences Trapp Farm Park Floating boardwalk, bogs, and connection to Lebanon Hills Regional Park Wandering Walk Park Trails within ravines, hillsides, grassy areas, and around wetlands Other Modes CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING Eagan currently provides cross-country ski trails in four parks; Northview, Patrick Eagan, Blackhawk, and Thomas Lake. In addition, Eagan residents also have cross-country ski trails available such as the Minnesota Zoo and Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Other regional facilities are available within convenient driving distance including Fort Snelling State Park, and Murphy- Hanrehan Regional Park. Burnsville and Apple Valley also maintain cross-country ski facilities accessible to Eagan residents. Additional cross-country trails beyond those currently groomed by the city should not be expanded upon unless additional demand becomes evident. Regional park and open space elements meet the need for longer trails and for more sophisticated cross-country skiers. Regional parks also provide skate ski trails currently in demand by more practiced skiers. Eagan facilities meet an activity niche catering towards families, beginning, and intermediate users that desire outdoor experience with moderate challenge levels. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 8.13 8 TRAILS Current grooming agreements with the City of Lakeville provide a cost-effective approach to maintaining cross-country ski trails in City parks. • MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS The City of Eagan has made a sizable commitment to a strong municipal trail system. The City's aggressive maintenance program includes planned seal coating of hard surface trails, ongoing debris removal, boulevard mowing, and selective vegetation trimming. It is important that continued commitment to trail maintenance occur thereby minimizing future liability and maximizing user satisfaction. An expanded trail system will require a corresponding increase in the financing of trail maintenance functions if current standards of maintenance are to be continued. Eagan currently does not snowplow trails. This is a difficult issue with broad based implications including trail use, liabilities, cost impacts, and staff responsibilities. Prudent decision -making regarding snow plowing must consider the actual amount of trail use gained given the level of investment required. Community sampling should be conducted to survey constitute needs and expectations regarding winter trail use. Other adjacent communities with active snow plowing programs such as Burnsville and Apple Valley should be contacted regarding their experiences and cost commitments. As Eagan matures and its population continues to increase, winter trail use and related snowplowing activities will be in higher demand. • GOALS AND POLICIES Trail goals and objectives provide guidance for facility planning, implementation, operations, and maintenance. The following policy statements should be used by community decision -makers and reviewed annually for consistency. Goals 1. Provide a coordinated trail system of state, county, and local trails which meet the recreational and transportation needs of the citizens of Eagan. 2. Develop a citywide trail system that minimizes potential conflicts between trail users and motor vehicles and ensures the safety of the trail users. 3. Develop one mile to one and one-half miles of the trails system per year. • • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN S•14 • • • 8 TRAILS 4. Wherever possible, segregate incompatible trail uses. 5. In an effort to minimize trail construction costs, trails are to be constructed in conjunction with state, county, and city street improvements. 6. Educate citizens on proper use, operation, and safety rules governing trail use. 7. Encourage the private sector to assist the City in the provision of trail support facilities (i.e., rest area, bike parking area, etc.). 8. Update the City ordinance concerning the responsibility of property owners to perform snow removal on sidewalks in residential areas. 9. Reexamine future opportunities and costs associated with implementing a boulevard/street tree landscaping program. 10. Examine the need for additional signalization, signage, or special crossing facilities at the City's high -volume traffic crossings. 11. Establish a consistent trail signage and public information program. Policies GENERAL 1. Give trail development priority to the following areas: • Trails that link together separate portions of Eagan's trail system to other communities. Trails along major streets that have the most direct access to trail destinations. Trails that will serve the most intensely used commuter destinations. • Trail construction within existing major parks and playfields. • Trail inclusion in appropriate new park development and off -road trail corridors. 2. Cooperate with state, regional, and county agencies in the formulation of a comprehensive trails system and to eliminate duplication of facilities. MARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAGAN, MN S-18 8 TRAILS 3. Cooperate with adjacent suburban communities to coordinate trail system connections between the communities. 4. Work with the appropriate authorities to identify and utilize needed railroad and utility rights -of -way needed for trails. 5. Increase public awareness of recreational and transporta- tional opportunities available through trail use by utilizing the media of radio, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, and community events in a community promotional campaign. 6. Periodically update trail brochures that show the trail routes, parks, playfields, and service and rest facilities. 7. Develop a clear and concise system of trail graphics and signage that direct people along trails to specific points of interest. 8. Post trail safety rules along trails that give instructions on the safe and proper use of the trails. 9. Adopt traffic signing to control trail traffic and to educate both the motorist and trail users as to their relationship in traffic patterns. 10. Conduct surveys periodically to assess frequency and characteristics of use, safety, and other factors on major portions of the trail system. 11. Design trails to comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 12. Finance the development of Eagan trails system through capital improvement programs augmented by grant programs, such as ISTEA, wherever possible. 13. Utilize the trail dedication fee on newly platted parcels for trail right-of-way acquisition and development. 14. Develop trails in conjunction with roadway improvements (County and City). 15. Develop supportive facilities (i.e., bike parking areas, restrooms, water, rest area, benches, etc.) in conjunction with trail development. 16. Route trails to minimize stop signs, cross traffic, and mixing with other modes of transportation. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN] EAGAN, MN •-961 • • • 8 TRAILS 17. Establish trail priorities to identify trails to be constructed in five years. Annually review and reassess the five-year trail priorities. 18. Provide long-term financing for trails maintenance to ensure compliance with established standards for seal coating, repair, and boulevard maintenance. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN 1. Develop a city trail system that connects major residential areas with schools, parks, shopping areas, centers of employment, civic facilities, and other recreational and commuter destinations. 2. Promote trail use as an alternative mode of transportation as well as for recreational purposes. 3. Wherever feasible, require the construction of bikeways in conjunction with all improvement of streets designated for trail development in the following manner: Major County Arterials —An eight to ten (8-10) foot bituminous trail on both sides of roadways. Minor County Arterials —An eight to ten (8-10) foot bituminous trail on both sides of the roadway. Major City Collectors —An eight to ten (8-10) foot bituminous trail on both sides of the roadway. Minor City Collectors —An eight to ten (8-10) foot bituminous trail on one side of the roadway. ResidentiaVLocal Streets —No trail or sidewalk shall be required. 4. Review special requests for construction of sidewalks in residential areas in accordance with the City's petition review process and the following evaluation criteria: • Continuity and connections with existing trails and sidewalks. • Utility and benefit for transportational purposes. • Linkages and routings between major points of destination. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 8.17 8 TRAILS • Potential number of residents and pedestrians to be served by proposed sidewalk. • Existing topography, right-of-way, and other site considerations. • Long-term maintenance and replacement costs. • Other special benefits or costs associated with the proposal. 5. Major routes and paths in Community or Linear Parks should be built ten (10) feet wide, in bituminous paving with slopes not exceeding five percent wherever possible. 6. Design and construct trails according to the standards established by the State Department of Transportation and State Planning Agency. 7. Encourage private users to provide bicycle parking facilities. 8. Promote bicycle safety education courses in the City's public and parochial schools. 9. Promote and encourage the utilization of bike and pedestrian corridors as ski -touring routes during the snow season and consider other possible uses of bicycle trail corridors when safe and proper. Design Guidelines for Trails Suggested design guidelines or standards for trail construction were arrived upon during the planning process and are summarized within this document's appendix section. These guidelines establish desired dimensions, materials, performance criteria, and layout parameters for various modes. The guidelines should be consulted for planning and design exercises. Eagan's trail system phasing and implementation is opportunity driven, or substantially influenced by available funding and its timing. Need, demand, and public safety issues must also be considered. The following objectives establish general guidelines for implementation. 1. Pursue trail improvements where they exist within road right-of-way consistent with highway or street projects as either construction or reconstruction. Employ county improvements as trail system backbone. • • !BARTON ASCHN AN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN ■•9S • • 8 TRAILS 2. Employ available federal or state funding programs such as ISTEA and integrate into the system. 3. Establish trail corridors in conjunction with private sector sub -division thereby acquiring needed off -road trail right-of- way and minimizing subsequent neighborhood disruption. 4. Complete critical sections and missing links to maximize system continuity. 5. Resolve and improve safety issues to maximize user well being. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN B•19 8 TRAILS BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC, PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 8-RO 1/4 112 314 MILES FORT SNELUNG STATE PARK / 1 / / / 1 1 4"♦`,// / / n a� / II�s'f 1� AP 1 • r``A, AKL t 1 I / 1 • / i 1___,./ ',.,....514606kIlBA__z-._ i C �0`�/ ` "-\W000HAVEN ‘�� y' PERIDOt I PATH . i Lyd col I ..... CEDAR POND RIVEIr,I HILLS CINNAMON C:amekar; 1P1RNELIAN HIGHVIEYY PILOT KNO HEINE s. POND N. qt EVERGREEN COUNTRY HOME MENDOTA I HEIGHTS -,.., ralf,tluA�dei�la�Vue�divaaal • % (y 5 ` it• 31 li1 LEXINGTON I i ••• SHINE 11 1 ♦ i ♦ Ij __ r ♦ _ _ 1 �` i I `j I1 - ) ',i , .. •1 /ham, �� _ t; OAKRS I ii . I 1 IL aamiati.DMdiWitcl. J C. 0 CLEARWATER Irff Rd GEORGE OHMANN v WESCOTT COMMONS MUELLER FARM Ansa:X.1M. — LEXMIG NORhview Park R WESCOTT STATION iWANDERI WALK 8 TRAILS FIGURE 8-1 COMMUNITY TRAILS PLAN LEGEND EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL EXISTING SIDEWALK TRAIL PROPOSED OFF ROAD TRAIL PROPOSED ROAD CORRIDOR TRAIL PROPOSED STATE TRAIL PROPOSED REGIONAL TRAIL EXISTING CITY OF EAGAN PARKLAND EXISTING STATE OR COUNTY PARKLAND PROPOSED TRAIL HEAD/INTERPRETIVE CENTER ifil HIGH SCHOOL a MIDDLE SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PM 0 CIVIC COMPLEX EXISTING SHOPPING AREAS PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 8-23 • Recommendations for System Policies • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • • 9 RECOMMENDATIONS CHAPTER 9: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SYSTEM POLICIES • INTRODUCTION Eagan's park, recreation, and open space facilities and programs are developed and operated in conformance with a wide variety of both formal and informal policies. Staff are in the process of organizing and formalizing these policies for inclusion into this section. This chapter will be the common policy location for future reference by staff, elected and appointed officials and citizens at large. MARTON ASCHIVIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN I-1 9 RECOMMENDATIONS BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN B•B • • • io Land Acquisition and Facility Development CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 10: LAND ACQUISITION AND FACILITY DEVELOPMENT • INTRODUCTION As Eagan nears the year 2000, the park system will be challenged by three capital intensive aspects. These include: Land acquisition for active and passive uses, open space, and natural resource preservation New facility development Redevelopment or renovation of existing facilities Each of these needs is important to Eagan's residents given continued community growth, increasing facility needs, land absorption trends, and aging park facilities within mature neighborhoods. This chapter provides an overview of potential land acquisition, anticipated facility development, and a continued response to park redevelopment. In tandem with Chapter 11, System Funding and Financing, the chapter summarizes the general timing and financial implications of major park system improvements. Justification and rationale for these recommendations occurs earlier in this park system plan. Chapters dealing with Needs and Demands Analysis (Chapter 5), Recreation Programs: Review and Analysis (Chapter 6), Natural Resources (Chapter 7), and Trail System Plan (Chapter 8) should be consulted to provide more depth regarding parcel and facility locations, the potential timing of facilities, and community need, both present and future. • LAND ACQUISITION Future land acquisition needs are driven by a variety of factors reflecting both active and passive recreation demands. A summary of the influencing factors follows. (Refer to Table 10.1 and Figure 10.1.) 1. Neighborhood Service Area Demands —Chapter 5, Needs and Demands Analysis, identified five neighborhood areas where acquisition will be required for neighborhood common BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10-1 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT TABLE 10.1 LAND ACQUISITION SUMMARY"' Page 1 of 2 (Parcel Numbers Refer to Figure 10.1) Parcel Parcel Owned Name Desired Size/ Acres Purpose/Function Priority for Acquisition Commence Near Term (1994-1997) Mid -Term (1998-2002) Long Term (2003.2010) 1 Cray Research/ Cole 40-60 Open apace or community park • Joint development with Cray, Inver Grove Hts 2 Various 10-20 Open apace or youth athletic complex • Looping trade, fishing access around pond 4B Deloeh/Oldre 2-8 Open apace, linear park or Highview expansion • Function will determine facility development 9D --- 80 Alternative site for youth athletic complex --- -- -- Acquire only if used for athletic fields 10A State of MN/ Burger 10 Neighborhood park/special use facility • Expansion to Moonshine, maximize shoreline 10B Midwest Savings 10-15 Open apace, passive recreation • Obtain water accesa, develop trails 11A Northweatem Mututal Life 20-30 Open apace, passive recreation, employment center, and community use • Acquisition amount relates to function and land use 11B Opua/Et.al. 60 Open space, community park • Acquire property, develop trails, water access 12A Opue/Et.al. 40 Open space, community park • Acquire property, develop trails, youth athletic site 15 McCarthy 15 Open space, potential neighborhood park, common or linear park • Required acreage and facilities will vary according to function 16A Sandberg/Hay -- Open space/wetland viewing area' • Potential easement 16B MN Hospital Service Assoc. — Open apacelinear park • Consider trail development 17A MN Hospital Service Assoc. 6 Open space or Skyhill Park expansion • Consider trail development 17B Hillcreat Dev. 15 Open space, conservancy • Preserve resources, trails 17C Hillcreat Dev. 15 Open space, conservancy • Preserve resources, trails "'Note: Methods other than fee acquisition may be applied for other space preservation. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATE% INC- PARK SYSTEM PLAN. EAGAN. PAN 1O-12 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT TABLE 10.1 LAND ACQUISITION SUMMARY' Page 2 of 2 (Parcel Numbers Refer to Figure 10.1) Parcel Parcel Owner/ Name Desired Size/ Acres Purpose/Function unc Priority for Acquisition Comments Near Term (1994-1997) Mid -Term (1998-2002) Long Term (2003-2010) 18 --- 4-6 Neighborhood common or neighborhood park • Site and acreage are not determined; joint opportunities exist 21 Bieter Co. 12-15 Neighborhood common or neighborhood park, potential school site athletic fields • Site and acreage are not determined; explore city/school development 22A McCarthy 10 Linear park, alternative neighborhood park • Linkage between Windcreat and Patrick Eagan 22B McCarthy 5 Linear park • Linkage between Barbara Curry and Patrick Eagan 23 Argue Dev. 5-10 Open space, linear park • Develop looping trails, preserve pond edges 25A Shiela 7 Linear park • Trail connection to Lakeside Park 25B Urban 7 Open apace • Looping trail around wetland 29B Boeael 6 Open apace or historic farm/historical site • Potential public/private partnership 33 Diamond "T' Ranch 15-20 Open apace or linear park, addition to Walden Heights Park • Trail connections in Lebanon Hills 34 Doering/ Schindeldecker 1-2 Linear park or G. Ohmann expansion • Trail link between Ohmann and Lebanon Hills 36A Holz/ Middlemiet 7 Historic farm site • Operating historic farm site West End Hunting 8-12 Open apace •• Preserve wetland feature illB 6C --- 6-8 Neighborhood park site • Complements elementary school site; joint city/school development • "' Note: Methods other than fee acquisition may be applied for other space preservation. ■ARTON ASCFMAN ASSOCIATES INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10.3 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT TABLE 10.1 LAND ACQUISITION SUMMARY"' Page 1 of 2 (Parcel Numbers Refer to Figure 10.1) Parcel Parcel Owner/ Name Desired Size/ Acres Purpose/Function Priority for Acquisition Comments Near Term (1994-1997) Mid -Term (1998-2002) Long Term (2003-2010) 1 Cray Research/ Cole 40-60 Open space or community park • Joint development with Cray, Inver Grove Hta. 2 Various 10-20 Open space or youth athletic complex • Looping trails, fishing access around pond 4B Deloahh/Oidre 2-8 Open space, linear park or Highview expansion • Function will determine facility development 9D •-• 80 Alternative site for youth athletic complex -- --- -- Acquire only if uaed for athletic fields 10A State of MN/ Burger 10 Neighborhood park/special use facility • Expansion to Moonshine, maximize shoreline 10B Midwest Savings 10-16 Open space, passive recreation • Obtain water access, develop trails 11A Northwestern Mututa] Life 20-30 Open apace, passive recreation, employment center, and community use • Acquisition amount relates to function and land use 11B OpualEt.al. 60 Open space, community park • Acquire property, develop trails, water access 12A Opua/Et.al. 40 Open space, community park • Acquire property, develop trails, youth athletic site 15 McCarthy 15 Open apace, potential neighborhood park, common or linear park • Required acreage and facilities will vary according to function 16A Sandberg/Hay •-- Open space/wetland viewing areas • Potential easement Consider trail development4 16B MN Hospital Service Assoc. -- Open space/linear park • 17A MN Hospital Service Assoc. 6 Open apace or Skyhill Park expansion • Consider trail development 17B Hillcrest Dev. 15 Open apace, conservancy • Preserve resources, trails 17C Hillcrest Dev. 15 Open space, conservancy • Preserve resources, trails °1 Note Methoda other than fee acquisition may be applied for other space preservation. • MART ON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10.4 MENDOTA HE1GH7 •••••astmasimia••••••••;.-3....iimosist\-is'..1.11-sms•Nomm•ism-sii_z_Liya_a.mitiissimp_ 0 1.4 1 2 3,4 MILES BL OOMING TON AV /;•/ , ,._ 18 17 .„, s / ---„„ / :-›- 16B --,---,,, / A7A A."-\ • I 7111 , l• N,18 O ,--k. --' / ' 4' slyer ,---- .e6 3 0, , e \ G 946 • / i,,' / , 1 ,./.---- § t -S.-' PER' -------,...--, '------' 1....,,..--•• PATH Ci) lit' : '''., , - CEDAR 1 eloii • a 1--- i re J --------1 'r ---' z Li 1 I 1 LS C0/0/4!100 r ' • • • -,, •33 \ ;IP • ASIA __L. 1" tz a s AC k-- ca, A ,---.' ,• LEBANON t., 1 (5. - \ --; r. ,...,....-,/, l• 0., ,, • I • • e !,t / HILLS i _ _ - 4-1141-41-11-01-0•4-0-11-1I-104-akul-ir-s--ar-irm s 0-ir. . ' . (ROSkyOUNT ,... wool:mos/EN •-•,,,-,,,, ,,,,,,,,,....,/,‘,/,..::. - = , . ) 1 I et, 12:i . a, . mEAD4-LAin; -;•.- ',' 1, RAHN HIGHV PILOT KNOB 0 COUNTRY HOME • MOONS — 34_ L .73 LE)GTON Lone Oak i 11A_, 11111: Yank.ee Doodle Rd - - WESCOTT 1 COMMONS -,------, 4 WESCOTT LS b: '----, / •,. ...0 ••••-. 1: : :..n.,........i..... , . . • tj L '''. — !If_ .1 ,...,..„.,,0., . , . , • t • II 1 ‘ Ili WALNUT ;_______ : • ; • (•-•• LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK • , Ps••••••••••••••-•-•-•-•-•-•-0-6-0-0- APPLE VALLEY IU 36A al 0 36B memo is-a-mai-s-a,' • • g/ I 5B • 1 • (4' 1.1 • •* • • LU i 6 Cr to ,1 Cr LU i • WANDER • WALK 7- - MOLE Fa Ai I • 10 DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 10.1 PARCELS FOR PARK ACQUISITION OR PRESERVATION LEGEND • PRIORITY PARCEL FOR ACQUISITION OR PRESERVATION EXISTING PARKLAND GENERAL SEARCH AREA - SPECIFIC PARCEL UNDEFINED PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAPJ, MN 10 - 6 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT or neighborhood park development. These include Areas 15, 18, 21, 22, and 36E. Each neighborhood is described more fully later in this chapter. 2. Community Parks —Acquisition of parcels for community park purposes is needed to meet future population demands (refer to Table 5.5 in Chapter 5). Existing community park active area acreage meets current population levels. However, anticipated community growth will likely generate demand beyond current capacities. This need is also apparent due to the lack of existing community park acreage in Eagan's northeast quadrant. 3. Community Athletic Fields —Land acquisition may be required for a future youth baseball complex, girls softball fields, and youth soccer. The exact need is contingent upon timing of community growth, participation rates, and community demographics. 4. Linear Parks —Chapter 8, Trail System Plan, identifies linear park corridors as a component of the off -road recreation trail system's continued development. Eagan has made a commitment to several off -road corridors. However, additional acquisition would infill missing links and greatly enhance the usefulness of shared use with MnDNR and Dakota County Parks. 5. Passive Open Space —A detailed summary of remaining community open space is described in Chapter 7, Natural Resources. Priority parcels for preservation were identified, of which select parcels should be purchased. Non - acquisition methods may also be employed to preserve other parcels' resource character. Table 10.1 summarizes potential parcels for acquisition and their future role within the system. Alternative sites are noted where appropriate. Additional detail regarding parcel needs, related facility development, and project intent follows. • DEMAND FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND FACILITIES This section provides a summary of those facilities or park system components for which land acquisition or facility development must occur. Included in this summary are active facilities, passive elements, and special use components. Active Facilities Quantitative and qualitative measures exist within the Needs and Demands Analysis chapter that have identified the need for BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10.7 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT active park facilities, primarily in response to athletic service demands and organized activities. Existing or future needs are likely to exist for the following facilities or system components: 1. Adult Softball Complex —Development of Lexington-Diffley Park as an adult softball complex has been initiated. This facility will be comprised of a minimum of six softball fields designed to meet and surpass official softball regulations. Support facilities including parking, comfort buildings, concessions, storage, maintenance, and other amenities will be incorporated into the park's development. Layout and design of the complex should accommodate future ballfield lighting to maximize the facility's use and capacity. Lighting of both softball and soccer fields should occur by the year 2000. 2. Northview Park Lighting improvements —Maximum use of the Northview ballfields should be obtained by adding field lighting. This improvement will extend the playability of these fields into the evening hours, thereby maximizing their efficiency and increasing overall capacity. Lighting should be completed by the year 2000 and in conjunction with Lexington-Diffley lighting to obtain the lowest installation cost. 3. Youth Baseball Complex —Future population growth and changing demographics may continue to pose increasing facility needs for youth baseball activities. In response, a four- to six -field complex should be constructed, if adequate user demand exists, comprised of fields rated for each of the various age categories and activity groupings. Ideally, this facility would be best developed as a joint use complex with a school district. Joint development would maximize the facility's use, produce efficiencies for both development and operation costs, and utilize a location convenient to the user groups. The key to such a solution, however, is obtaining adequate land at a location agreeable to both the City and school district. Blackhawk Middle School in Section 21 could serve as a candidate site for joint development if additional land is acquired. A City -owned site could occur at other locations including Parcels 2, 9D, and 11 B/12A. This facility would include ballfields designed for varying age groups. Ballfields would not be lighted initially, however, that option should be maintained. Support facilities including bleachers, storage, parking, and restrooms should be considered. • • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10-111 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT The following measures could be considered to delay or take the place of a youth baseball complex: A. Alternative game scheduling could occur that extends field use into afternoon or weekend hours which are currently are not utilized. B. Extending the season of play could also be considered. This approach would produce additional capacity from existing facilities and allow for "early summer" and "late summer" leagues. C. Lighting of middle school and/or high school facilities would increase field use and benefit both student programs and community recreation programs. Funding between the school district and the city could be prorated based upon use. 4. Softball (Girls) —Additional softball fields for girls' use may ultimately be required. Existing and near -term needs may be met at Rahn Park once adult softball uses are redirected toward Lexington-Diffley. However, ultimate community needs may require two to four additional softball fields for girls' use. Once again, the most efficient solution may be a joint use facility at a middle or high school site. Current school construction programming should address this issue. City and school district staff should cooperate in obtaining adequate land area as a part of school development for future girls' softball field construction. Eight to 16 acres may be required assuming joint use of existing school parking. 5. Soccer Facilities —Near -term soccer facility demand will likely be met by informal open space within the City. Mid- term soccer field use will be accommodated at the Lexington-Diffley Athletic Complex including three full-size and one overlay fields. Soccer fields or overlay fields should also be considered within the Blackhawk Middle School complex meeting mid-term to Tong -term needs. Alternate sites include Ridgecliff and Wescott Station Parks. Long-term soccer need and the resulting need for additional fields is contingent upon soccer participation rates. Increased user participation and an increasing community population may pose the need for additional full-size fields. These fields should ideally be incorporated into an athletic complex such as the youth baseball complex to minimize maintenance and maximize field use. Independent fields are desirable rather than overlay fields due to lengthy and variable soccer seasons that conflict with ballfield use. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT HAGAN, MN io.e 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT 6. Facility Distribution —Specific active use facilities such as hockey and tennis have traditionally been dispersed throughout the community to achieve uniform neighborhood access and service. Standards and needs discussed earlier in this system plan (Chapter 4) examine the location of these facilities and neighborhoods where additional development may be required. A discussion of the primary activities follows: A. Ice Hockey —City standards suggest hockey rink distribution in the community with a 10- to 15-minute service area. Placement would normally occur within a neighborhood park, and would potentially be located in pairs to reduce maintenance costs. As diagrammed in Figure 5.21, a substantial portion of Eagan is adequately serviced, however, the central and southeast neighborhoods should have improved access. This may be accommodated by: An exterior hockey rink adjacent the proposed civic arena (Service Area 22) or inclusion of a hockey rink in a future Service Area 15 neighborhood park. • Development of a future neighborhood park in Service Area 36E adjacent the proposed elementary school. B. Pleasure Skating —Distribution patterns and service area standards (3/4 to 1 1/4 miles) are similar to ice hockey. Eagan's central and southeast neighborhoods are currently inadequately serviced. Future pleasure skating facilities should coincide with new hockey facilities to maximize maintenance efficiency and obtain uniform service areas. A free-standing pleasure rink in the South Oaks Park area should be considered. Neighborhood rinks without regular use should be closed permanently or "moth -balled" until adequate demand exists. C. In -Line Hockey —Current trends and excitement for in - line hockey will require on -going monitoring by staff. If in -line hockey is a long-term interest, then Eagan must determine whether a public response is needed or if the demand can be met by private enterprise. If public actions are appropriate, initial rinks should be centrally located. Paving of one hockey rink would test community demand. Future expansion locations could include Rahn, Skyhill, Bridle Ridge, and Goathill Parks. • • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAGAN, MN 10-10 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT D. Tennis—Eagan's standard tennis court distribution is a 3/4 to 1 1/4-mile service area or one court per 2,000 residents. Figure 5.20 (Chapter 5) illustrates current court distribution and voids within the central commu- nity and the southeast corner. Courts could be considered in future park facilities adjacent the: • Blackhawk Middle School (Service Area 21) • Elementary School (Service Area 36E) E. Volleyball —City volleyball standards suggest a minimum of one court per 5,000 residents. Actual sand court volleyball use within the City varies somewhat due in part to participant leadership and user spirit for the activity. Future volleyball sand courts should be added, if adequate demand exists, at Lexington/Diffley and Northview Parks, and at the future youth ballfield complex. F. Unique Activities —Requests for space to conduct unique or unusual recreational activities are regularly received by staff. Model airplaning, dog trials, and off - road mountain biking are examples of such activities. City ordinance prevents uses such as model airplaning and rocketing from City parks. Other uses such as dog trials may conflict with traditional park activities. Real demand for space to host these activities will not justify a separate, designated parcel. Staff should monitor requests and gauge the actual demand. Once real needs for space and facilities become apparent, opportunities for these activities should be identified and time slots should be designated. For example, model airplaning could be conducted during those weekend hours when youth ballfields are not scheduled. Other activities such as off -road mountain biking could be directed to single -use sites such as former gravel borrow pits that can tolerate site impact. G. Other Athletic Fields —Demands for football and rugby play should be met by school district facilities or shared use with other traditional field activities such as soccer. Northem Tier Community Park Need for community park development occurs due to anticipated community population growth and the lack of facilities in Eagan's north -central and northeast sectors. This need could be met by the development of a north -central or northeast community park facility. These facilities would provide additional community park •ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 10-11 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT space and further distribute activities and events to those areas of the community lacking larger community park elements. The need for another community park, based upon the needs analysis, population growth, and community desires, will likely become apparent in the near to mid-term (by the year 2000). Opportunities for necessary land acquisition are quickly diminishing as private development consumes potential candidate parcels, therefore, park acreage should be pursued as soon as practical. Community park location criteria should include the following items: • Location within a portion of the community currently underserved by other community park facilities. • Location where future population or employment is likely to increase. • Proximity of attractive resource base including water basin or wetland areas, woodland cover, topographic relief, or other natural amenities. • Convenient access and proximity to nonresidential roadways. • Parcel size 25 to 60 acres. This size may be increased if a youth ballfield component is associated with the community park as an adjacent element. The most probable community park candidates include (refer to Figure 10.1) Parcels 1, 11A, and 11B/12A. These parcels have been carefully reviewed by the Commission in Tight of the parcels' existing locations, physical characteristics, development trends, and ongoing development proposals. Commission priority for a community park has been established as site 11 B/12A. Neighborhood Park Development Options and conclusions contained within Chapter 5, Needs and Demands Analysis, examined park service areas that will likely require future neighborhood facilities. These neighborhoods include Service Areas 15, 18, 21, 22, and 36E. Future residential development and changing land uses will almost certainly require neighborhood park development within these areas. However, exact solutions to location and facility development cannot be prescribed at this time. Land development patterns, land use changes, roadway and infrastructure development, and timing each pose critical BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10.12 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT influences for the most preferred solution. In each of these service areas, land acquisition is likely to complement existing parcels or to provide for neighborhood park development. Facility development should respond to individual design solutions and park classification, that being a neighborhood common or a neighborhood park. Park classifications contained within Chapter 4 depict typical facility development associated with each category. A summary of each service area follows with a depiction of likely land acquisition or facility development. Moonshine Park Expansion —Surrounding neighborhood needs are currently met by Moonshine Park. Lying adjacent LeMay Lake is a 4.9-acre parcel (Site 9D—Figure 10.1) that could serve as an initial building block that transforms the existing undeveloped neighborhood park into a special use facility/ neighborhood park. Opportunities for expansion exist east and south of Moonshine Park in the vicinity of I-35E. This expansion parcel has limited woodland with the dominant area previously used for agricultural purposes. Future facilities could include: Access and parking Trails Lake exposure and access for non -motorized watercraft Fishing piers Picnic facilities Restroom and maintenance/storage Play apparatus Looping trails Landscaping and earthen berms may be necessary to buffer noise intrusion from I-35E. However, LeMay Lake provides one of the few opportunities in the north -central portion of Eagan incorporating natural resources, open space, and park expansion opportunities. Service Area 15—Resolution of Service Area 15's neighborhood park requirements will be determined by the area's future development configuration. Park dedication requirements should be directed toward parcels adjacent the existing water basin and to interconnect existing parks and planned parcels for acquisition. Six to ten acres should be sought within Service Area 15 for future development with traditional neighborhood park amenities and winter activity facilities. Interconnecting trails between Barbara Curry, Fish Lake, and O'Leary should be developed to the greatest extent possible, thereby providing an open space network with a variety of park activities. MAR TON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 10.13 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT Park dedication and acquisition should maximize the opportunity for interconnections with adjacent parks, to preserve water basin edges for public access, to maintain woodland cover, and to provide an open area for active park uses. Service Area 18—Potential redevelopment opportunities, changing land use, and development infill will determine the future need for neighborhood park facilities within this service area. For example, a significant increase in multifamily units would heighten the need for neighborhood park facilities. On the other hand, nonresidential uses would pose moderate requirements. This service area's substantial variables pose difficulties for resolution at this time. Park and Recreation staff should closely monitor private development activities and those of Community Development studies to determine future park needs. Opportunities for shared use or a public/private venture should be considered. Service Area 21—Ultimate park development within Service Area 21 will be determined by future development configuration, land use, roadway layout, and the design of Blackhawk/Deerwood Schools. Many of these variables will become more apparent with the resolution of current litigation. Shared use or joint partnership with the school district should be strived for to maximize active parcels and neighborhood park facilities within the service area. Resolution of Johnnycake Road and Thomas Lake Road alignments must take into consideration future park opportunities. For example, alignments swinging to the west would create the greatest opportunity for park parcels that abut school district property. Consolidating parcels could provide space for neighborhood park and athletic facilities. Additional school district acquisition will likely be required to meet school facility needs. A neighborhood common or small neighborhood park should also be pursued in the vicinity of the fire administration building. Although parcel space is limited, this location would increase access to the northern service area and future multiple family. Four to six acres would be desirable for the park development. Service Area 22—Tremendous opportunity exists for interconnection of existing and future public facilities within Service Area 22. Park sites, the elementary school, public library, civic complex, and future civic arena would all benefit from interconnection by trails and linear parks. Park dedication should seek to preserve these opportunities in developing a system strengthened by the collective public parcels. Existing undeveloped parcels located within the central, north -central, and • • • BARTON ASCHPAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 10-14 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT southeast portions of the service area will determine actual park needs. While park acreage within this service area appears abundant, it is difficult to uniformly service the area's residential neighborhoods due to their distribution and difficult access. Therefore, additional acquisition and facility development within the service area should: • Rely on interconnecting trails for convenient access to neighborhood facilities. • Maximize opportunities for shared recreational use including Glacier Hills Elementary. • Minimize duplication of facilities but strive for equal distribution within the service area. • Utilize open areas for active recreation rather than impacting woodland and sloped areas. Service Area 36E—Proposed elementary school development within Service Area 36E holds the key for neighborhood park facilities. Twelve to 13 acres will be acquired by the school district for site development. An additional two to four acres should be acquired through park dedication in the Pine Ridge Addition to complement school district property. This shared use venture can meet the area's neighborhood park requirements in the most effective manner while providing a centrally located facility. Joint facilities of the city and school district should meet the intent of Eagan's neighborhood park standard (refer to Chapter 4). Winter activity facilities should be incorporated to meet the community's southeast skating/hockey needs. • SPECIAL FACILITIES The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Systems Plan identified a number of special facilities which could contribute to the leisure time range of activities. Some facilities are regional in nature, and some are provided by profit and non-profit entities. As each special facility opportunity is examined, a number of questions are appropriate to consider. Some are included in the following list: • Does the facility/program fill a gap? • What population groups are served? • Does it serve a public purpose? • Will it produce income sufficient to sustain the program? • What is the capital investment? • Are there sources of funding available for capital and operating costs? BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 1O.9B 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT • Are there profit or non-profit organizations that would provide the program? • Can public access be assured? • Will the facility leverage other public and private investments? • Will other program goals be met or existing/future costs reduced? Increasingly, meeting public leisure needs does not necessarily mean public ownership and direct investment. Public access needs can be met through contract agreements, time segment rentals, cooperative programming, joint use agreements and so on. The key is to establish a diverse and flexible leisure time program and facilities base, maximizing public investments. A survey of City Council members, Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission members, and Park and Recreation senior staff conducted during the planning process in April 1994 identified general needs regarding community special use facilities. The survey format queried participants regarding the importance to the community of numerous activities or facilities and subsequently asked them to establish comparative ratings regarding the community's current ability to meet that facility's intent. For each facility, participants were asked to identify that element's importance to the park system on a numeric rating from 1 to 10. Qualitative ratings of excellent, good, fair, and poor were used to evaluate Eagan's ability in meeting that facility or activity's need. Responses of the three survey groups were generally consistent (refer to Table 10.2). Distinct conclusions could be drawn regarding several specific activities or facilities that participants felt were important to Eagan's park system and yet poorly met in terms of existing facilities. Specific facilities of high importance included a nature or interpretive center, nature trails, outdoor amphitheater, historical or operating farm, swimming areas, fishing facilities, arboreta, public golf course, community center, community gardens, BMX/off-road biking, and a community bandshell. Several other elements were also identified, but to a more moderate extent including a community historical museum, small craft water access, skateboarding facilities, recreation trails, group picnicking, cross-country skiing, trails around lakes, football, in -line skating, and gymnasium space. The vast majority of these items are specific facilities necessary for select activities. For example, bocce courts and frisbee golf are tailored to specific activities rather than free-standing park components. These facilities are generally located within community parks and, as a result, would not require additional land acquisition. EARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 1O-1S • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EAGAN WHAT PARK FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES DO YOU REALLY WANT 1N YOUR COMMUNITY? Directions: Rate the following characteristics according to their importance to Eagan residents and how Eagan compares Circle the rating that apphes TABLE 10. 2 Page 1 of 2 Activity/Facility Importance Ratings are: 10 = Most Important Characteristic; 1 = Not Important Comparative Ratings are How Eagan Compares to Ideal, E to P Aver Rating' Ave Importance Rating Most Important Not Important Excellent 4 Comparative R Rating Good Fair Poor 3 2 1 Nature Center 8.25 10 9 IN 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F • P 1.44 Community Historical Museum 5.31 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G F ■ P 1.50 Nature Trails 8.56 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.81 Amphitheater 5.00 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F ■ P 1.50 Farm --Historical or Operating 5.75 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G F ■ P 1.25 Recreation Trails 9.19 10 II 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E ■ G F P 3.40 Day Camp 5.65 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G ■ F P 2.36 Group Picnicking 8.27 10 9 ■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E i G F P 3.00 Swimming 8.44 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F ■ P 1.43 Sledding/Tobogganing 7.50 10 9 8■ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.79 Cross Country Skiing 7.63 10 9 8■ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G ■ F P 2.47 Fishing 7.56 10 9 8■ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G • F P 2.60 Archery 4.69 10 9 8 7 6 5■ 4 3 2 1 E G • F P 2.53 Nature Watching 6.94 10 9 8 7111 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.86 Arboreta 6.25 10 9 8 7 ■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F■ P 1.67 Creative Play Apparatus 8.25 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E • G F P 3.13 Trails Around Lakes 8.87 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.93 Youth Baseball 7.94 10 9 8R 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E ■ G F P 3.38 Transportation Trails 7.19 10 9 8 ■7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E ■ G F P 3.13 Softball 8.13 10 9 ■8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E ■G F P 3.07 Horseshoe Court 4.81 10 9 8 7 6 51I 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.87 Soccer 7.50 10 9 8■ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E ■ G F P 3.33 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAOAN, MN 10-17 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT TABLE 10 2 Page 2 of 2 Activity/Facility Average Rating Importance Ratings are: 10 = Most Important Characteristic; 1 = Not Important Comparative Ratings are How Eagan Compares to Ideal, E to P Rating' Importance RatingAverage pComparative Most Important Not Important Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor 4 3 2 1 Small Craft Water Access 5.88 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2,67 Football 6.44 10 9 8 7■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G ■ F P 2.19 Skateboarding 3.78 10 9 8 7 6 5 4■ 3 2 1 E G IN F P 2.06 Bocce Courts 4.50 10 9 8 7 6 5■ 4 3 2 1 E G F• P 1.94 Frisbee Golf 3.65 10 9 8 7 6 5 4■ 3 2 1 E G F■ P 1.75 Public Golf Course 6.13 10 9 8 7■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F ■ P 1.56 In -Line Skating 6.12 10 9 8 7 ■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G • F P 2.56 Basketball 6.88 10 9 8 7■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.75 Hockey 6.71 10 9 8 7■ 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.81 Community Center 8.59 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G F • P 1.50 Community Gardens 5.41 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G F■ P 1.75 Historical Sites 6.24 10 9 8 7 116 5 4 3 2 1 E G F■ P 1.56 Zoo 4.59 10 9 8 7 6 5■ 4 3 2 1 E G ■ F P 2.53 BMX/Off-Road Biking 3.17 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 ■3 2 1 E G ■ F P 2.13 Gymnasium Space 7.71 10 9 8■ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E G • F P 2.12 Community Band Shell 5.41 10 9 8 7 6■ 5 4 3 2 1 E G F■ P 1.65 Bowling 5.18 10 9 8 7 6 ■5 4 3 2 1 E G■ F P 2.63 Family Picnicking 8.47 10 9■ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 E■ G F P 3.69 Source: Barton•Aschman/Resolution, Inc. Average ratings based upon aggregate responses to survey conducted in April 1994. Participants included Eagan City Council members ;4;. Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commissioners (6), and senior Park and Recreation staff (7). 2 ■ designates average aggregate score. • • ■ARTON ASCHNIAN ALWOCIAT■ao INC. PARK BY.Ttpi PLAN{ CAOAN. PAN 10.1a • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT TABLE 10.3 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL SPECIAL USE FACILITIES (1) Activity/Facility Potential Location Comments Nature/Interpretive Center Patrick Eagan Park Refer to Chapter 7--Natural Resources Community Historical Museum Historical farm site, i.e., Holz site Volunteer assistance is required; rehabilitation of farm building Nature Trails/Trails Around Lakes Dispersed sites Refer to Chapter 8--Community Trails for locations Amphitheater Community park(s) Flexible facility for small to large groups P Historical Farm Holtz Farm site Multiuse site Swimming (Outdoor) Free-standing, civic campus or community park Site varies contingent upon manmade versus natural basin Day Camp Community Park--Blackhawk or Patrick Eagan Environmental programs Fishing Community park or special use facility Incorporate fishing pier and non - motorized access, shoreline fishing Swimming Civic area or community park Outdoor pool and/or wave tank Arboreta Community park or special use facility Visible, accessible site; incorporate into historic farm Small Craft Water Access Community park or public open space Minimal facilities Skateboarding Community park Unique facility Football Joint use of school site Incorporate rugby and other field games Hockey (Indoor) Civic arena in civic complex Public or public/private venture Public Golf Course Existing private course Acquisition required Community Center Free-standing, civic complex Consider gymnasium and indoor pool Community Gardens Remnant open space Annual plot rental, consider historic farm site Community Bandshell Community park Alternative to amphitheater Needs based upon informal survey of City Council, Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission, and Park and Recreation senior staff during April 1994. ■ARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGANN MN 10.19 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT Other facilities such as a historical farm and public golf course are unique, individual park components and would necessitate land acquisition to meet the activity needs. A summary of the desired or important elements according to survey response is found in Table 10.3. Prior to special use facility development, the City of Eagan should undertake a broader survey of the community to verify the desire and need for facility development. This public input may gauge demand and type of facility desired. Select special use facilities may require minimal expenditures for development. These include frisbee golf, fishing, and community gardens. However, other special use facilities may require substantial investments such as the public golf course or community center. • GOLF COURSE OVERVIEW AND EVALUATION This golf course special facilities overview evaluation is an example of an evaluation that brings increasing levels of detail of information upon which to make policy choices. In the case of golf, Eagan has two privately owned, public play facilities and one private play facility already in place. Golf is an increasingly important leisure time pursuit (18% of Minnesotans participate, leading the nation) and is a part of the City's recreation and open space system. In fact, flexibly managed, a golf course can contribute to a number of recreational and environmental pursuits. Golf feasibility goes beyond mere population numbers to the composition of population, nature of area courses and income and operating performance. However, from a systems planning vantage point there are two basic questions: Are there enough golf courses to meet existing and future demand? What approaches are there to assure that present golf courses will continue? As noted, if program goals can be met, private and non-profit financial participation reduces the need for public expenditures. As program needs grow, arrangements and approaches will need to be modified to meet emerging trends. The next level of detail of evaluation will need to be undertaken when conditions change or opportunities become available. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN 10-E0 • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT Existing Golf Facilities Golf play in Eagan is offered through two, privately owned, public play eighteen hole courses: • Carriage Hills Golf Course • Parkview Golf Course 5,914 yds 4,568 yds Par 71 Par 63 Within a ten to fifteen minute drive primary trade area, there are a number of additional public play golf opportunities: Valley Wood Golf Course Apple Valley Par 71 6,376 yds Inver Woods Golf Course Inver Grove Heights Par 72 6,720 yds Fountain Valley Golf Course Farmington Par 72 6,560 yds Chippendale Golf Course Farmington Par 71 6,306 yds Apple Valley Golf Course Apple Valley Par 32 1,770 yds Birnamwood Golf Course Burnsville Par 27 1,242 yds Brockway Golf Course Rosemount Par 35 3,010 yds Mendota Heights Golf Course Mendota Heights Par 27 Several private courses and country clubs also serve the area. In the Twin Cities, public play courses host 70% of the rounds played with membership facilities starting 30% of area rounds. Similarly, eighteen hole regulation golf is the preferred round with nine hole regulation, executive and par three courses playing important roles for leagues, fill in rounds and developmental experiences. Potential Golf Course Needs The following graph displays the trends in new golf courses to the present national total of 12,000 courses. A major spurt occurred in the late twenties and early thirties leveling out until Arnold Palmer came on the scene in the sixties and public play courses exceeded private courses for the first time. The biggest BAATON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAGAN, MN 10•21 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT growth has been in private/public play courses many as part of real estate developments. A market assessment of the demand for area golf relies on specific demographic characteristics such as age, income, education, occupation and previous play. Based on regional participation rates, Eagan has 8-12,000 golfers. Youth and female golfers are the fastest growing segments of the golf market. The following chart shows the breakdown of play by age group. The highest percentage of players parallels Eagan's age structure except for the 18-24 and 45-54 year groups. As the community ages, more people will be in the greater participation groups. The older golfers also play more frequently. A typical national cross sectional average would indicate a demand for an eighteen hole metropolitan course for every 23,000 people. Based on that rule of thumb, Eagan would need two eighteen hole facilities today with an eye toward reserving an area for a future third course. Participation by Age Group 1990 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 7-11 12-17 18-24 Ape Group • Eagan El US Participation Rate Source: RESOWTK Inc;NSGA,/GF • • • BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN1 EAGAN, MN 1O•R2 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT Retaining Existing Courses for Public Play JOINT PROGRAMMING POTENTIALS The existence of privately owned and managed golf courses as the sole providers of facilities raises some system planning questions. One group of questions to consider includes how to create recreational and developmental programs for City residents, and how to assure continuing public access. Often a natural fit exists where golf course marketing efforts to increase play are merged with public recreation programs to create an increasing supply of golfers and golf interest. The biggest barrier to initiating play has historically been the availability of equipment. The rationale is fairly obvious - buying a set of golf clubs without knowing whether you will be interested in continuing play is highly speculative and expensive. However, lessons with equipment, programmed introduction events, demonstrations, etc. can be recreational, market expansional, and even produce a profit center for the City while enlarging the market for the golf facility. A joint program with the City, schools and private operators could result in a natural, synergistic relationship. GOLF COURSE BENEFITS AND COSTS Assuring preservation of the golf course for public play, short of public acquisition, is a bit more problematic. First, the golf course land should be viewed in a broader context, which, depending on site conditions and design, can offer a wide range of community benefits: • Habitat protection or restoration • Open space • Trails • Winter time skiing, tubing, etc. • Group events • Hospitality events Golf Wetland protection Residential property value enhancement General economics for a new golf course capital investment are helpful in evaluating the most productive manner to establish or retain a community golfing opportunity. A newly established BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN• MN 10•R3 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT eighteen hole regulation golf course capital investment might break down as follows: Golf Course Capital Investment Land: 150-200 acres @ $20,000/acre Course Construction: Clubhouse, Facilities, Equipment: TOTAL INVESTMENT $3 - 4,000,000 $3 - 6,000,000 $1 - 2,000,000 $7 - 12,000,000 The actual market value for an existing course would be weighted more heavily toward net operating income experience and expected return on investments compared to similar investments. COURSE PRESERVATION OPTIONS The most direct approach to preserving golf facilities would be to open direct discussions with current ownership or management to create joint programming opportunities and to assure the financial health of the facility. The City could be aware of any proposed ownership changes and assess what appropriate level of public support or intervention might be appropriate. Some other approaches to preserving future acquisition options, if necessary, are worth outlining. These options still require sources of financing. No discussion has been offered on the range of long term acquisition financing approaches. Should the City desire to maintain golf through direct ownership, it would look first to revenue based sources in the form of revenue bonds. Equity or debt requirements might be reduced with a balanced contract for deed. It is also possible that a non-profit corporation could be formed, attracting equity involvement through gifts, donations, and memberships. It too, in working with the City, could go the bond or mortgage market for acquisition and/or development funds. To preserve future options, it would be consistent to zone the property according to use and planned future use.The golf course would be zoned for a public recreational use, not necessarily eliminating the possibility of converting to another public recreational use, but greatly reducing that potential, since golf would probably bring about the greatest economic return. The zoning designation would permit a range of evaluations to occur should a proposal be made to discontinue public recreation use. A change in use to a residential subdivision or commercial center would require City action and the City could decide what course of action would be appropriate at that time. If the golf course would fall on hard times, then the question would be • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN. MN 10424 • • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT whether or not the zoning eliminated all practical use. If that was found to be the case, then the City would again have the option of purchasing or revising the zoning. Another technique would build on the public policy decision to use public means to assure continuation of the golf courses. State law permits adoption of an "official map" on which proposed future investments are identified. If someone proposes to secure a building permit for one of the parcels identified on the official map, the City has the right to acquire that property for fair market value within a specified time period, or if it decides not to buy then it issues a building permit. The zoning and official mapping techniques have merit in assuring a public decision before discontinuing existing golf facilities. Golf Course Evaluation Summary 1. Two eighteen hole public play golf courses exist in Eagan. Based on metropolitan rules of thumb, three courses could be expected to be supported by the estimated 2020 population. 2. Privately owned and cooperative/programmed golf courses could promote public use and economic benefit without public ownership. 3. To assure continued public availability, the land could be zoned public recreation or included in the official map or both. Any proposal to discontinue the golf use could then be examined on its merits and a decision to acquire or discontinue the use made. • PRIORITIZATION OF LAND ACQUISITION AND FACILITY DEVELOPMENT Contained within Table 10.1 is an initial prioritization suggesting timing for land acquisition. Numerous factors contribute to the timing of actual acquisition and facility development. Such factors include community activity demands for facilities, recreation programming, available grants and funding, and private sector development pressure. Of these criteria, the greatest variable may be private sector development timing as it relates to land acquisition. Eagan's opportunities for additional park and open space parcel acquisition are rapidly diminishing as continued private sector development occurs. Pending residential and commercial development continues to absorb existing community open space in rapid fashion. It is critical that the City continue to concentrate its efforts on land acquisition if it is to meet future activities and programming while preserving key open space and natural resource parcels. This prioritization should be reflected in the department funding and staff priorities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10•126 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT • LONG-RANGE FACILITY MAINTENANCE/REPLACEMENT Eagan's park system's rapid growth and development has focused available resources toward land acquisition and development of new facilities. However, many of the park facilities are at an age where their Tong -term maintenance and replacement must be anticipated and provided for. This need will increase as the system ages and matures. In April 1991, staff prepared a "Long -Range Facility Maintenance and Replacement Program" that provides a systematic approach to maintaining facility integrity and anticipates the "capital" investment necessary in the future. The most recent update to the plan covers the years 1995 - 2016. Elements contained within this program are those with a life expectancy set by material quality, maintenance, or necessary replacement. Specific items addressed include park lighting, backstops, hockey rinks and fencing, park buildings, play structures, foot bridges, and irrigation systems. Life expectancy of these items and necessary replacement or substantial rehabilitation is identified based upon manufacturer information, staff experience, level of use, and material construction and composition. However, other factors contribute to facility life span including environmental conditions, vandalism, and changes in use or activities. The program does not address items such as grills or park benches due to their relatively short life span and low capital investment. A summary of each major item follows. 1. Bituminous Maintenance —Bituminous surfaces, parking Tots and trails, are to be seal coated five years after installation and then five to six years after each seal coating. Overlays may be necessary for parking lots and trails every eight to ten years. Tennis courts and hard courts have similar maintenance requirements. However, color coating and striping is applied four to six years after installation and then four to six years thereafter. Court overlays occur every eight to ten years. 2. Park Buildings —Maintenance is required for items prone to wear including carpeting, roofing, furnace, water heater, and so on. 3. Fencing —Tennis and athletic field fencing is anticipated to last 30 to 40 years prior to replacement. Backstop fencing will require replacement within 7 to 20 years depending upon activities and amount of use. Athletic complex backstops will require replacement more frequently than typical neighborhood parks. BARTON ASCNNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10•013 • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT 4. Foot Bridge —Prefabricated metal and wood foot bridges are anticipated to last 20 to 25 years; with wood planking, 10 to 15 years. Regular structural inspections are needed to identify potential failures and minimize liability. 5. Hockey Rinks/Fencing—Tentative life span for hockey rinks and fencing is 10 years. This time frame varies with use and amount of activity. 6. Irrigation Systems —System maintenance and replacement is contingent upon the various components from which it is comprised. Valves and pumps are expected to have a 10 to 14-year life span, while piping and controllers will generally last 15 to 17 years. Incremental replacement will occur to maintain system quality. 7. Park Lighting —Security lighting is generally the responsibility of Dakota Electric with the exception of poles, which are to be maintained by the City, and the system should last approximately 40 years. Activity and athletic field lighting is the City's responsibility. Fixtures for hockey and tennis will likely last 15 to 20 years, whereas ballfield fixtures may last 20 to 30 years. 8. Play Structures —Life expectancy for play structures is 10 to 15 years based upon levels of use, ongoing maintenance, and weather conditions. Actual replacement, however, may be shortened depending upon safety criteria and specific designs. The preceding summaries provide a concise description of those elements requiring regular maintenance and replacement or rehabilitation. The "Long -Range Facility Maintenance and Replacement Program" should be consulted for additional detail. In addition, the program anticipates capital investments necessary to maintain element integrity and the likely timing of these reinvestments. Special use facilities will be added to the park system as it matures and when adequate demand exists. These facilities, such as swimming pools and indoor hockey facilities, will require a different level of maintenance and replacement. Capital necessary to maintain their quality will also increase and must be anticipated prior to their development. Ongoing facility maintenance and replacement is a critical component to Eagan's park, recreation, and open space system. Deterioration of the system will decrease usage and the ability to service Eagan residents. Delaying maintenance or facility replacement will likely increase related costs and may require BARTON A2CHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN] EAGAN, MN 10.27 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT total facility replacement or redevelopment rather than corrective maintenance. • ADOPTION OF FACILITIES FOR OTHER PURPOSES Eagan's park and open space system has made a commitment of facilities to meet the recreation and programmic demands asserted by its population. Existing programs reflect the popularity of existing activities in terms of facility type, capacity, and quality. However, the composition and capacity of these facilities may change over time due to recreation trends, changing per capita interest and participation, and new products or activities that evolve over time. In addition, the community's demographics will evolve and change the demands from one facility type to another. For instance, softball participation among Eagan's adults has increased over the past decade and stabilized in the early 1990s. The City has made, in response, continued investments in athletic complexes and fields to meet this demand. It is not known whether the community's population and aging demographics will continue to support the need for additional expansion of these facilities. New recreation modes are also emerging. The advent of in -line skating has rapidly increased and may also challenge community leaders for special trails or in -line hockey rinks necessary to meet this demand. Their Tong -term popularity and resulting facility commitment cannot be determined at this time. It is extremely difficult to predict with accuracy the demand and capacity for specific facilities within the next decade and certainly for any period of time beyond 2005. Limited land, facility, and capital resources will challenge community decision -makers to maximize the usability of existing facilities while meeting com- munity demands. Therefore, facility flexibility may be paramount to successfully meeting future facility and activity demands. The following approaches to facility flexibility should be considered to enable reuse or adoption and maximize facility flexibility: 1. Park Layout —Future park layout should take into consideration uses other than those currently programmed for. Space allocation, circulation, access, and parcel geometry pose opportunities or constrictions for adapting parks to changing uses. 2. Engineering and Construction Practices —Traditional engineering applications normally take into consideration a single use or activity. For example, hockey rinks and tennis courts are designed for their respective activities rather than to accommodate other events. Flexibility might be sought • • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10•1211 • • 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT in specifying hard surfacing, removable fencing, and relocatable athletic goals. Bituminous cross-section design and other standard details should also be examined for their compatibility with other activities. 3. Infrastructure —Grading, drainage, and utility design for parks should anticipate future uses. In select cases, sleeving for future utilities such as irrigation might be considered during initial park construction to preserve park flexibility and minimize future cost expenditures. 4. Standards —Important for park design and development, however, they can also curtail creativity in adapting park facilities for alternative uses. Standards should be reviewed and revised recognizing that parks and their facilities may evolve over time and host alternative activities. • TIMING AND FINANCING This chapter has recognized the primary land acquisition and facility development aspects of Eagan's future park system. The timing and financing of these improvements are discussed in Chapter 11, which should be consulted for supplementary information. Chapter 11 also contains a comprehensive summary of future park system improvements. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 104E9 10 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT !BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 10•30 • System Funding and Financing • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • • 11 FUNDING CHAPTER 11: SYSTEM FUNDING AND FINANCING ■ CONTEXT This chapter advances the park system plan components of the previous chapters into a capital improvement investment plan and strategy. A capital investment improvement is generally that which establishes or improves the physical property, represents a threshold level of expenditure (e.g. $10,000), represents a mufti - year useful life, and is tangible. In the case of parks, recreation, open space and natural resources investments discussed here, a capital investment includes land and development activities but excludes lower cost equipment and vehicles such as wheel barrows, lawn mowers, picnic tables and swing sets. It also excludes items such as nursery stock, emergency repairs, and concession products. The capital improvement investment plan attempts to provide the background to make a number of policy choices: • What level of investment should be pursued? • What should the priorities be given that a desired program and identified needs will likely always be larger than resources available? • What should be the posture to attracting new financing sources through entrepreneurial programs, fee based activities, joint ventures with other government agencies and private parties, solicitations and donations? • How will capital investments impact the quality of the community and ongoing operating considerations? These and related policy discussions can only be made after examining the information and continuing the dialogue that accompanies the planning process. Capital Investments Capital investments related to parks, recreation and natural resources are grouped into the following categories: • System Investments • Land Acquisition/Dedication • Site and Facility Development BARTON ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SIAGAN, MN 11.1 11 FUNDING • Special Recreation Facility Investments • Natural Resource Investments • Replacement/Renovation Investments Financing Sources Financing sources supporting these investments fall generally into the following categories: • Property tax based revenues. • Grants, dedications, gifts and donations from others. • Provision of facilities and services by others. This "revenue source" is based on the City facilitating or joint venturing to broaden the revenue with other levels of government (Lebanon Hills) or private/non-profit provider (Caponi Park, YMCA) or joint venture (School District 192 and Sienna Corporation). • Special revenue producing programs and facilities. Two important points are made by this chapter: 1. Investments in parks, recreation and natural resources are not free-standing isolated expenditures. They have an important role in reinforcing the economic vitality of the City and creating a positive living and investment climate. 2. Investment expenditures and revenues are not single source or the sole responsibility of government. Investments are made to engage the broadest range of participation and to reinforce other community objectives. Therefore, it is not appropriate to establish a bottom line City investment. Instead, the City should be prepared to engage and leverage other resources. Before examining the specific investments and financing opportunities to be considered, a general discussion of the role of government and the public systems is in order so that it is clear that the investments to be considered are a public responsibility. ■ LOCAL GOVERNMENT ROLE Natural resource and open space protection, parks and recreational programs and facilities financing is increasing in complexity and in the interrelationships between public and private sectors. Access, equity, and protection remain the cornerstones for a comprehensive community park, open space and recreation program. At the same time, examination of ways to enlarge the historical recreation provider perspective to examine new roles which encompass private and non-profit sector activities (bowling, nintendo center, church -based singles • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 11•R • • • 11 FUNDING club, movies, industry -based leagues and facilities, in -line skating rental, fraternal clubs, social service providers, etc.) is an important imperative as well. Without tracing the role of local government in a free society, it seems accepted that some level of responsibility for environmental protection, recreation, and public open space is a local government responsibility. Government, and local government particularly, possesses a number of unique qualities: • Governance responsibility for all of the geographic territory within its jurisdiction. • Granted police powers for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. • Nearly exclusive regulation of land use (exceptions are specifically preempted uses and higher level sovereign governmental entities). Those unique attributes suggest some baseline responsibilities: • To comprehensively plan for the development of the community. • To allocate resources - financial, physical, and regulatory - which promote public health, safety and general welfare. • To allocate development based on orderly deployment of utilities, transportation and public open space. • To protect natural resources. • To assure a level of access to all residents, property owners, employers and employees. • To establish a public program which identifies and interprets the cultural aspects of the community and reestablishes it. Conceptually applied to Eagan, the baseline parks and recreation responsibility would be to plan and coordinate the recreational open space and natural resources of the community, develop approaches to achieve plan objectives and assure access to users. This could mean limited public land ownership and limited recreational programming and services or major land ownership and direct, extensive programming. Recognizing and working with private and non-profit resources permits striking a balance. • FINANCIAL STRATEGY OBJECTIVES This systems plan has attempted to establish a traditional base line approach for providing parks, open space and recreation service. It recognizes that the tradition is Tess black and white as social needs increase, financial resources become strained, and the line between public and private becomes more blurred. Many of the suggestions in this plan revolve around resource availability. But to plan only to known, existing financial BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN Y1.3 11 FUNDING resources is to miss opportunities to establish new ventures and innovations. Creation of a sound, long range, and stable park, recreation and natural resources program relies on a number of important policy objectives: • Establish stable base funding for operations, capital investments and facility replacement/upgrade. • Actively pursue partnerships for facilities and activities. • Emphasize programs and improvements which prevent remedial actions or major expenditures later. • Explore and pursue new avenues of funding and revenue generation. • Invest in staffing, programming and facilities which leverage or facilitate programs and facilities by others. This baseline approach at establishing policies, particularly related to financing and operations, which promotes the public health, safety and general welfare and permits moving beyond baseline requirements, assures that justification and responsibility will be built into the process. This planning process has established the basic components of the plan to include: • Establishment of a system of parks and open space. • Protection of natural and environmental resources. • Consideration and extension of facilities and services. • Identification of recreational, cultural and social programs and activities. • Identification of private and non-profit sectors leisure time facilities and programs. The investment strategy initiated in this plan views the park system as an integral part of the development context of the community. The return on investment is substantially larger than a well developed set of facilities. Some of those additional returns are outlined in the next section. • SYSTEM INVESTMENT BENEFITS The challenge for establishing capital investment levels is to Zink clearly to the benefits provided and to a strategy which pursues, attracts and manages changing funding opportunities. Positive leisure and natural resource land, facility and program investments are known to: • Improve the image and identity of the community. • Result in property value enhancement. • Create an improved tax base and attract economic development. • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 11•4 • • 11 FUNDING Builds strong families. Reduce instance of juvenile crime. Reinforce healthy living thereby reducing medical costs and increasing personal enjoyment. Expand appreciation for others, cultures and the environment. Save long term costs such as environmental clean up or remedial programs for youth/adult criminal offenders. Promote energy conservation. Enhance air quality. Clearly, park, recreation, and natural resource investments are an important and integral part of a community's comprehensive investment strategy. Of major importance is that leisure, education and resource based investments are at the front end of the social and environmental problem cycle. Protecting the wetland will avoid flood protection and wildlife habitat restoration. Parks will enhance and protect property values. Recreation and education will reduce health care costs and the spiraling need for courtrooms and prisons. ■ HISTORICAL INVESTMENT STRATEGIES Eagan has staged its land acquisition development to correspond with resource availability and area need. Emphasis has been placed on assuring that land is available and then improving the park or recreation facility in a phased manner. Not only does that policy assist with management of scarce resources, it also permits phased reinvestments where replacements and upgrade needs occur at varying intervals rather than all at one time. ■ CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM This plan contains a number of investment proposals. It furthers Eagan's fundamental system built around the neighborhood parks, extends opportunities for outdoor recreation, and promotes protection of environmental and natural resources. Metropolitan level and major cultural and entertainment resources are left to others (e.g. Twins, Guthrie, Minnesota Zoological Gardens, Science Museum). Plenty of opportunities are reserved for private and non-profit providers as well as other governmental jurisdictions. A number of special facilities are suggested along with a progressive program of replacement and refurbishing existing investments to avoid a major decline in existing and aging facilities. The investment program requires a recognition of the need to provide for programming, operating and maintenance funds as well. But it does not mean that Eagan must do all of the elements or pay all of the bills. Instead, partnering and creative BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.8 11 FUNDING pursuit of funding are important. If someone gave the City a large gift, would it produce a conundrum or fit right into an investment schedule? If a service organization decided to raise funds and construct a facility, would they be encouraged and directed or put off? If a developer wanted to use a piece of property and build in a recreation component or an equity position for the City, would discussions continue? This plan establishes the basis for a positive response to all of these questions. Table 11.1 is a composite investment schedule in the above context. It encompasses a number of time frames - immediate, five years, ten years and long term. It does represent a comprehensive program for consideration. The components are: • Park System Investments • Land Acquisition/Protection • Site and Facility Development • Special Facility Investments • Natural Resource Investments • Replacement/Renovation Investments Finally, although not a capital investment, operations, maintenance and program elements need to be considered because more people and more facilities have an impact on staffing and operating budgets. Investments are based on the plan standards and land and facilities necessary to meet those standards. These relationships are illustrated in Figure 11.1. Park System Investments System investments have emerged from the needs and facilities analysis applied against working guidelines and compiled in the previous chapters. The system elements exclude special facilities and natural resources and work around the neigh- borhood park building block. The system components include: Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Commons Community Park Community Recreational Facility Lineal Parks Special Use Parks and Natural Resource Components are discussed separately. Investments are divided in all groupings - between property acquisition/dedication/use agreement and development investments. Development activities are further subdivided: • Site Preparation • Play Equipment • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN Tl-5 • • 11 FUNDING Table 11-1 City of Eagan Parks, Recreation, Natural Resources and Open Space Capital Investments i�nawoa,.rawa arouon• o o ., r Total Investment Time Frame r LandF Cost Est Development e : i Total I 5 rn 10yyr.' 1W.'yr„ tows..Area (Ac) I $40k/Ac Totals Investment !Annualized stem Investments • Neighborhood Parks Neghborhood Parks Neighborhhood Parks Existing Proposed Opportunity • 1 32 2 0 $1.377,000 : $1.377.000 $275,400 • • 6 54 3 18 32,180,000 720,000 0 0 2,160,000 y 720.000 216.000 72,000 • • Community Parks Community Parks Community Parks Existing Proposed Expansion • 5 1.685.000 '" 1,885,000 337,000 • • 1 1 45 5 1,800.000 200,000 0 0» 1,800.000 200,000 120.000 13.333 • • Athletic Fields Athletic Fields Existing Proposed • 7 1,996.000 ,, 1,995,000 399,000 • 15 40 1,800.000 1,910.000 z 3,510,000 351.000 Linear Parks • I 40 1600,000 250,000 1,850.000 370.000 Special Recreation Facilities Investments Existing Fatalities • 7 i $373,000 $373,000 S74,600 Nature/Interpretive Center • 1 - 900.000 900,000 90,000 Nature Trails • 1 - 300,000 : 300,000 30,000 Historical Farm 1 • 1 7 425,000 450,000 3 875,000 87,500 Amphitheater • 1 - 800.000 1 800.000 80,000 Outdoor Swimming • 1 - 2,500,000 00 2,500,0 250,000 Day Camp • 1 j - 240,000 I:: 240,000 24,000 Community Center • 1 - 8,000.000 : 8,000,000 800,000 Ice Arena • Indoors • 1 - 2,800,000 . 2,800,000 280,000 Scupture Garden • 1 - 0; 0 0 Arboreta 1 • 1 1 - 225,000 `'' 225,000 22,500 Gott Course 1 175 3,500 000 4,000,000 :: 7,500,000 750.000 Natural Resource Investments Natural Resource/Open Space Near Term • . 16 ' 242 9,880.003 50,000 I., 39,730,000 $1,946,000 Mid Term • 7 118 4,720,000 40,000 II 4,760,000 478000 Long Term i • 4 1 37 1,480,000 10,000 ' 1.490,000 74.500 ReplacemenUUpgrade Investments Pavement Buildings Fencing FootBridges Hockey Rinks • , 74,100 68,200 16.200 83.000 74.100 88.200 16.200 83.000 7.410 6,820 1.620 8.300 i • 1 • I 11i • . • -t Irrigation Lighting Play Structures 1 • B3.000 66,500 597.000 83.000 66,500 ; 597.000 8,300 6,650 59.700 • t1 I • TOTAL 988,000 I P68,000 98.800 [Programs, Operations & Maintenance 31,849,000 • Land mayoe acauired M purchase. dedicator donaign lease 8 does not necessary mean pubic expenditure Land costs were averaged at S40 000 per acre •• Funding participator rs a map( financing cntera wtlrch would reduce direct pubnc expenditure Sources City of Eagan Fewutrn i.V. Barton Aschman Associates Juno 1994 MAP TON ASCHN AN ASGOCIAT ES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGANr MN 11.7 Table 11.2 11 FUNDING 199S-99 Eagan Park System Investments Projected Five Year Capital Improvements NC • Neighborhood Commons CP • Community Park SUP • Special Lisa Park NP • Mspnborhood Park LP • Unreal Park CAP • Communlry A thiefc Feld Part Class Acqulathon 1 She Prep Play Egu$p I Equlpment , Shelters I Mettles JParUng Trafl; Landscape Engineer I Total Athletic Site 83 Goat Hill Lex-OAftey Northview NorthviewtH gh School Ohmann Rahn Rahn Athletic Field subtotal CAF CAF CAF CAF CAF CAF CAF CAF Bladchawk Cedar Pond Pat Eagan Trapp Farm Thomas Lake Subtotal CP CP CP CP CP/SUP 0 0 0. 0 0' 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 45.000 175,000 325.000 350,000 1 100,000 50,000 30.000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 1 50.000 25.000 25.000 01 100,000 j• 100,000 350,000 0 . 125,000I 25,000 01 01 0 0 , 125.000 j 0 25,000 0 0_4 0 01 0; 0 0' 260,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.000 0 0 0 0 100,000 t 0 100,000 0 190,000 0 125.000 355,000 865,000 0 0 50,000 0 0i 25.000 01 0' Ot 150,0004 76,000 0 0 0 0 475,000 0 350.000 20.000 0 100,000 125,000 50.000 0 65,000 65,000 0 0 0 01 50,000 01 30,000 01 0; 1.045 000 , 130.000. 0I 125,000 100.000 190,000 100,000 305.000 1,995,000 11 25,00 925,000' 50.000 30,000 . 690.000 20.000, 0! rry Patch LP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 endot Path LP 0 01 25,000 0 0 0 01 0 0 , 25,000 rats Wandenng Walk Windcresl Subtotal LP LP 0 75,000 , 0 50,000 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 125,000 25,000 10,000 i 0 0 10,000 10,000 01 0 60,000 10,000 10,000 185.000 50,000 25,000 0 135,000 130,000 36,000 ' 10,000 1 345,000 0 Cinnamon Wescott Commons Subtotal NC NC Bndle Ridge Bun Oaks Capt Dodd Carnelian Country Home Downing Evergreen Highview Kettle Lakeside Lexington Meadowlands Moonshine Muellier Farm Oak Chase O'Leary Park Sect 18 Park Sect 21 Pilot Knob Ouarry Ridgediff River Hilts Section 36e Sky Hill Slaters Acres South Oaks Walden Walnut Hill Wescott Station Woodhaven Subtotal Cartson Lake Clearwater Fish Lake Herne Pond Holz Farm Kehne House Manor Lake Ravine Subtotal NP NP NP NP NP 0' 0 0! 0 0' 0 01 0 25.000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,0001 15,000 25,000 15.000 40,000 0 0 0, 0, 0, 0 0 0 0' 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 25.000 0 NP 0, 75.000 0 10,0001, NP 0, 01 25,000 , 0 NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP SUP SUP SUP SUP i SUP SUP 0 0 ; 35.000 . 0 0 01 0' 0 0 , 0 15.000 0 o . 01 25,000 { 0 0 0 , 25,000 , 7,000 01 0! 01 0 0 ! 30.0001 01 5,000 0 0 0 0' 0 30,000 0 0 0 50.000 . 25.000 20,000 75.000 . 25.0001 25.000 0 25.000 0 0 O 0 0 0 0' 01 25,000 0 O 01 25.000 0 0 01 15,000 15,000 0 0 25.000 0 0; 0 0! 0 0. 50.000 0 0 0' 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 35,000 25.000 0 0 0 0 10,000 0' O 0 O 35.000 1- 5,000 0 01 0 01 15,000 0; 0 55.000 0 00 01 0 30.0001 0 20,000 , 0 25.000 01 01 0 25.000 ; 35,000 : 0 40,000 01 25.000 ' 0 01 0 0 0 25.000 01 0 0 I 305,000 420,000 117,000 105,000 0 0, 0 01 O 0. O 01 04 0' 0 , 200.000 0 0 0 0 0 0I 1 1 I 04 0 0+ 0, 1 0! 01 20.000 01 0 i 01 01 of 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 01 01 0! SUP 0 01 0'' 0 0; 0 0. SUP 01 0' 0' 0 0 0; 200,000 , 0, 20,000, 0 0 OI 0 15.000 I 01 0� 5,000 0 0 10,000 01 0 0 165,000 0i 01 01 0 0' 15,000 0; 0' O1 10,000 0 0 01 0 0' 30,000 0' 50.000', 60,000 125.000 25.000' 35.000 0, 0 0, 0' O 0 0 200.000' O 0, 0, 0 30.000 0: 0' 30.000 30,000 0 ; 0 250,000 I Grand Total 1 0 1 980,000 ' 595,000 : 522,000 ' 1,305,0001 1,190,000 665,000 320,000 75,000 5 652 000 • • • 0 01 0 I 15.000 0 1 35.000 0 32.000 0. 1 01 5,000 75.000 0 30,000' O 0' 0 , 110.000 10,000 10.000 150,000 0 ' 0 . 25.000, O 0 0 01 0 ! 95.000 0 ' 0 f 25.000 15,000 01 45.000 50.000' 0 110.000 01 01 20.000 01 01 25,000 0 0; 160.000 O 0 25,000 01 0, 0: 10,000 0 35.000 116,000 ' 10,000 1,337,000 0 01 0 01 0; 0, 0' 0! 0, 0 . OF 20.000 ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11-S • • • 11 FUNDING • Equipment • Shelters and Park Buildings • Utilities • Parking and Trails • Landscaping • Engineering and Design These component elements are tabulated in the investment Table 11.2. LAND ACQUISITION/PROTECTION Preservation or protection of recreational space and natural resources amenities does not necessarily require direct land purchase, but instead encompasses an examination of a number of regulatory, fiscal, incentive and protection measures that could be applied. Land acquisition/protection for the park system is focused on filling in the missing neighborhood parks as those neighborhoods develop; protecting additional areas for community parks and community athletic facilities; connecting the lineal elements of the system; and acquiring or protecting natural resource lands (which is considered in a separate component). Seventy four acres of neighborhood parks, fifty acres of community parks, forty acres of athletic facilities and forty acres of lineal parks results in a total planned acquisition/dedication or joint use of 200 acres. Additional athletic facilities would be undertaken in conjunction with school sites. An average acquisition cost of $40,000 per acre was used to provide a ball park guideline for the magnitude of direct acquisition of the 200 acres which resulted in an annual investment of $538,000 in current dollars over the next fifteen years. This again, is a high side estimate assuming all system lands would be acquired by purchase. The important factor to note is that land appreciates in value as a result of inflation and value added by individual and City investments. Where improvements are being made, the City should consider acquisition/protection early to reduce ultimate acquisition costs. SITE AND FACILITY DEVELOPMENT Site and facility development is allocated to system components (neighborhood park, community park) and investment type (landscaping, utilities, shelters). The investment schedule covers the five year interval of the capital improvement program plus long range athletic facility investments and suggests an investment level approaching $1.25 million per year over the next five years to complete neighborhood, community and athletic field components. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.8 11 FUNDING The athletic fields component of the systems plan is receiving a major investment at the present time. Future demands for additional lighting, youth softball, girls softball, ice hockey, ice skating, in -line skating, tennis, soccer, and rugby are anticipated to be largely met in conjunction with other park, business or school sites. Forty acres of additional lands is contemplated at an estimated value of $1,600,000. Development costs would average $339,000 per year over the next ten years. ACTIVE RECREATION FACILITIES As noted earlier, most field oriented outdoor athletic facilities are anticipated to be developed in coordination with the school district. In addition, demand will be closely monitored to assess the need for additional fields, particularly youth baseball and soccer, If population growth and change expands youth age groups proportionately with today's age distribution, then the following athletic facilities are anticipated during the next ten to fifteen years: Additional Ballfield Lighting $ 310,000 Softball and Baseball Fields (10) 1,140,000 Soccer Fields (3) 150,000 Football/Rugby Fields (2) 100,000 Tennis Courts (8) 200,000 Ice Skating - outdoor lighted (2) 40,000 Ice Hockey - outdoor lighted (2) 120,000 In -Line Skating (1) 30,000 Many of the active recreation facilities are "if -then" type of considerations. If girl's softball grows at the projected rate, then a four field complex will need to be considered in five to ten years. There is also a direct connection of many of the facilities being directly related to existing or proposed school sites. One additional forty acre site is projected under the systems investment section. Lexington-Diffley expenditures do not include work underway in 1994. The total investment level for active recreation facilities is projected at $2 million over five to ten years, again depending on population growth and the demographic change predicted for the City. $1.1 million was invested in park system capital improvements in 1990, but investments have averaged about $370,000 per year the last three years. Funding has come from the park bonds sold in 1984, dedication fees, and grants. The commitment to construct Lexington Diffley will again raise the planned level of investment to $1 million in 1995. Resource allocations are fairly evenly divided between the system components. A preliminary five year investment schedule by element, location, and system component is included in Table 11.2. This program • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN. MN 11-10 • • 11 FUNDING will be reviewed and adjusted by the PRNR Commission and City Council before its implementation. Special Recreation Facilities This mix of facilities responds to some major objectives and opportunities. They are most subject to partnering arrangements. The ice arena is one example. The public financing of an ice arena and pool was rejected by voters. A group was formed to privately raise capital. The City authorized a challenge grant contribution to assure public access and encourage fund raising. The range of special facilities was outlined in the previous chapter. In part, much of this effort is opportunity based, seeking and responding to financial proposals. These are the natural facilities to be developed or funded by special groups, organizations and pledges efforts. Additional lands for acquisition for special facilities are not specifically identified, except for the historical farm acquisition and the golf course. Many special facilities would be adjuncts to current sites or in the case of the nature center, an opportunity to extend Patrick Eagan Park to express its special features as the nature center or City preserve. This could be emphasized by identification such as the Patrick Eagan Nature Preserve. Development investment levels are again rough benchmarks and do not imply necessarily that these are direct government expenditures. The existing areas targeted for improvements over the next five years include the Kehne House, Ravine, and Heine Pond. Each special facility would be subject to more detailed evaluation and funding feasibility analysis and as such are indicated as mid -range improvements. Natural Resource Lands In an extensive inventory of vacant land in the City, a number of parcels were identified for their potential to create open space, preserve important natural resource elements of the community (plant communities, prairie, water features, geologic features, etc.) That inventory was evaluated and ranked as to suitability and importance as part of a natural resource land base. The resulting list of parcels reported earlier met criteria and were included as part of the overall plan as natural resource lands. In many cases, the primary parcel identified would be host to a smaller parcel that would capture the values sought. The natural resource parcel could be protected by acquisition, dedication, or integration into a development site plan. The schedule of natural resource lands itemizes 27 parcels which could be included over a twenty year period. Sixteen parcels BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 19•Y1 11 FUNDING containing 242 acres would be considered important in the next five years, 7 parcel containing 118 acres would be considered in the ten year horizon, and 4 parcels containing 37 acres would reach out into the twenty year interval. If total public acquisition were initiated at the assumed $40,000 per acre cost, $700,000 per year in current dollars would be required over the next twenty years. It should also be noted that development costs were not estimated for these properties. Modern management practices would be employed to reduce intensive maintenance costs. However, some ongoing efforts will be required and investments necessary as the properties are inventoried and stewardship plans developed. Replacement/Renovation Investments The bulk of the park system improvements have been constructed over the last twenty years. As these facilities age, regular maintenance efforts will increase often to a point where a direct relationship exists between aging and increased operating and maintenance costs. The Parks and Recreation staff developed a long range facility maintenance and replacement program. The program was developed to recognize that necessity to keep facilities "fresh" to protect existing investments by not letting those facilities deteriorate to a point where complete replacement would be the only remedy. The evaluation developed a useful life and replacement schedule for eight major investment components. This investment schedule protects existing and past investments and continues the positive contribution of the facility. A rundown or deteriorating facility negatively impacts the community image and property values and encourages further neglect and abuse. Applying the replacement and upgrade criteria to the specific investment base produces the estimated ten year investment schedule depicted in Table 11.1. To maintain the quality of existing facilities will require approximately $100,000 a year in current dollars. The major components of the park system facilities include: • Park buildings • Fencing Footbridges Hockey Rinks Irrigation systems Park lighting Play structures Bituminous surface • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 41.9E • • 11 FUNDING Productive life spans were assigned to each park facility. They were based on material construction and composition. In addition, a number of other factors were considered including extent of use, soil conditions. climate impacts, vandalism, and related concerns. These life spans were considered beyond the regular and programmed annual maintenance program. In many cases timely renovation could prevent more expensive replacement. Using the life span calculations, each facility was rated and a program developed for reinvestment. An annual program would vary but would average a reinvestment of about $100,000 a year over the next ten years. Investment Summary It is not very useful to talk about bottom line investments when significant portions of the budget could come from non-traditional funding sources. Tables 11.1 and 11.3 annualize the investment program by park plan component. The present development schedule is mostly a five year horizon while acquisition and special facilities could extend out to twenty years. Annualized totals are for both acquisition and development expenditures. Natural resource acquisition and special facility development budgets lead the way. Virtually all of the system plan components are parity investments. Figure 11-2 graphically portrays the distribution of acquisition and development funds by overall system component. Figure 11-3 illustrates proposed development funding distribution only. Priority Allocation How much is needed to finance the program and how should it be allocated? Basics are fairly well defined in the plan. Expansion recommendations do not extend the envelop of reasonableness even though existing funding levels and sources will need to be expanded. It is recognized that needs will continue to outstrip resources allocated to this program. Therefore, allocation of scarce resources should be based on some extrapolation of the system objectives. What are some investment principles by which to allocate resources? • Safety - assure safe operations and conditions. • Protection - investments which avoid future remedial or restorative action or protect future opportunities. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.13 11 FUNDING iab(e i1-3 Eagan Parks Plan Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Investment Program Summary Sy Na Sp Re Development Time Frame Acquisition Investment 1 Time Frame Investment Teti Arno -maul Neighborhood 5 $1,377,000 10 $2,880,000 $563,400 Community 5 $1,685,000 20 $196,000 $346,800 Athletic 5-15 $1,995,000 20 $1,600,000 $278,5001 Linear 5 $250,000 10 $1,600,000 $210,000 1 :ural Resources ?cial Facilities DlacementlUpgrade Investments 5-20 $100,000 20 $15,880,000 $892,222', 5-20 $3,173,000 10 S425,000 $359,800' 10 $988,000 - $98,800 Programs, Operations, & Maintenance 1; 1 $2,000,000 Source: City of Eagan Barton Ashman Associates RESOLUTION Inc. Jiro • • ■ARTON ASCMNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, PAN 11.14 • • 11 FUNDING Figure 11-2 Eagan Park System Annualized Acquisition and Development Investments se0o 000 swo.000 S200,000 so 1111:141 mint Neighborhood Community Eagan Parks Plan Athletic Special Refurb Linear Natural Resource Park System Component Figure 11-3 Eagan Park System Annualized Development Investments Community $337,000 Special $634,600 Eagan Parks Plan Neighborhood $275,000 Refurb $98,800 Natural Resource $20,000 ■ARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.15 11 FUNDING • Control - virtually all leisure and environmental activities are site specific. Therefore, control of the land through ownership, easement, agreement, regulation or other approach is necessary. • Cooperation - leisure and resource needs cross government agency and provider lines. Investments which reinforce cooperation and reduce direct local expenditure are important. • Leverage - the ability to spend a dollar and attract another or get someone else to also invest is an important investment principle. • Diversity- establishing the framework versus in -filling is the principle here. An opportunity to capture a major plan element would be favored over the twelfth set of tennis courts, all else being equal. The key is not to pursue the exotic, but rather the framework for the basic system while continuing to fill-in the pieces. • Equity- another important and tricky aspect of an investment strategy. The neighborhood park and recreation area is the building block. But one for each park service area of the City is not equity when one area needs ballfields and the other walking paths. Equity means meeting a base line of needs. • Impact - will the investment have a greater impact for this purpose than another. ■ COMPARATIVE INVESTMENT LEVELS A great deal of information has been compiled recently on public service needs, fiscal capacity, fiscal health, local government aid, and spending patterns. Local government policy makers frequently look to comparative data to assess how they are doing. The challenge is in trying to find groups of cities with similar characteristics for legitimate comparisons. A number of factors are possible indicators such as size, land area, age structure, income, housing, growth rate, etc. Probably more than any other program and service, the broad envelope of leisure services - parks, recreation, natural resources, open space - are driven by what the community wants to be and the importance of public lands and leisure services in reinforcing that vision. Having said that, there is still reason to examine a few comparative fiscal factors for reference points recognizing that there is no established formula for determining how much public money should be raised and how it should be allocated between competing services and projects. Although this section focuses • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES., INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.1 • • 11 FUNDING on capital investments, the level of taxation and the expenditure patterns as indicators of the ability to raise revenues are important benchmarks. Property Tax Levels Increasingly, any level of property tax seems to be too high. And yet, attitude surveys indicate that voters will support higher taxes for specifically identified programs matching community priorities. Parks and open space have made their way onto that list. Recognition is increasing that parks, recreation and open spaces are an essential part of a healthy community fabric and in fact have a major impact on economic development. As Los Angeles put itself back together after the riots, residents and businesses were asked what was needed to make their community workable and to avoid future outbreaks of violence. Over 70% indicated that more parks were needed. AVERAGE HOMEOWNER PROPERTY TAX BILL COMPARISONS In present day terms, property taxes are rated against the tax base of the community, the agreed to needs and the relationship of the community to others in level of taxation. The Citizens League and Minnesota Taxpayers Association conduct an annual survey of taxes and rate communities on the basis of property taxes on an average value home for the community and a $90,000 home across all communities. The shortcoming of the $90,000 home comparative approach is that any particular community might have home values far different from the $90,000 level. Nonetheless, it does provide a benchmark to assess where any particular community is on that spectrum. Ninety-five Twin Cities communities were compared and the winner (or loser) was Little Canada in Ramsey County with a $1,382 tax bill. Forest Lake Township was lowest at $884. Eagan ranked eighty-sixth at $1,016. Part of that is due to explosive growth which frequently sees services lag behind demands. A sampling of area suburbs reveals the following 1993 tax bill for a $90,000 home: BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 1"1.17 11 FUNDING 1993 Tax Bill Ranking for $90,000 Homes Municipality Tax Bill Rank Little Canada $1,382 1 Maplewood 1,342 5 Savage 1,271 15 Eden Prairie 1,269 17 Minnetonka 1,243 25 Maple Grove 1,231 27 Woodbury 1,202 38 Inver Grove Heights 1,180 47 Plymouth 1,142 59 Lakeville 1,099 71 Burnsville 1,095 73 Apple Valley 1,034 82 EAGAN 1,016 86 Mendota Heights 947 94 Forest Lake Township 884 95 Source: Citizens League, Taxpayers Association Although recent school district bond issue approvals will raise property taxes, Eagan will continue to be one of the lower property taxed communities in the metropolitan area. Public Service Expenditures Comparisons Eagan is one of the top twenty-five growth areas in the metropolitan area and state. As noted earlier, the growth rate has been significant, and while the rate is expected to taper off, a third more people are expected to live in the City in the next ten to twenty years. Not surprisingly, high growth areas lag behind similarly sized established areas in the provision of public services. The full impact of the needs resulting from the host and variety of new development has yet to sink in. For example, using Minnesota State Auditor data for some compatibility of reporting, a group of high growth suburbs spends about $240 per capita for City services while built-up suburbs spend $300 per capita and higher property value suburbs appropriate $334 per capita. In 1990, Eagan spent $204 per capita for administration, public safety, streets, parks and recreation, and miscellaneous current expenditures, well below several groups of comparable cities. Parks and recreation spending comparisons include enterprise funds. Again, high growth suburbs averaged $39 per capita for parks and recreation while developed suburbs allocated $52 and • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 11-1B • • • 11 FUNDING high value areas appropriated $54 per capita. Eagan's comparable level of service expenditures per capita were $30. Whenever looking at comparables, care must be exercised. For example, in Coon Rapids most recreational programming is provided through the school system, while land and facilities are the focus of the City program. The following list mixes high development rate suburbs with others to provide a diversity of comparisons. Park and Recreation Per capita 1990 Expenditures EAGAN $29.64 Apple Valley 81.69 Inver Grove Heights 28.00 Chaska 191.82 Eden Prairie 58.61 Burnsville 47.77 Plymouth 38.31 Lakeville 27.36 Shoreview 48.95 Minnetonka 51.17 Mendota Heights 19.80 Maplewood 35.12 Bonded Indebtedness Debt versus pay as you go or equity financing is reviewed in more detail in the financing sources section of this chapter. The maximum amount of general obligation debt (pledged against the properties of the community) allowed is governed by state statute. As important is the evaluation of debt by the various rating services which establishes the cost of borrowing. That evaluation takes into account a number of community factors like age, jobs, political stability, etc. as well as level of debt. The relationship of debt to market value and population is also important. Eagan's currently assignable general obligation debt is about $679 per capita, putting it at the national average for communities of its size. Summary of Fiscal Comparisons Eagan is a high growth outer ring suburb with an expanding property tax base. Its spending and property tax levels are among the lowest in the metropolitan area. The City's general obligation supported debt is average with national communities of its size. Direct park related debt comparisons are not available. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11.19 11 FUNDING There is increasing sentiment to finance property related services with property tax dollars and human and educational services from income and other taxes. Clearly, parks and recreation investments enhance property values and attractiveness of the community. They are also shown to be able to impact long term remedial social costs. There is no magic to the amount to be raised from property taxes and spent for recreation and parks. These levels of revenue and expenditure are established by policy by elected officials weighing all of the complex matters which make up public opinion and long term community well-being. The City is fortunate to have reigned in its historical expenditures so that it has a great deal of latitude in choosing policy levels of service and expenditure without challenging most of its peer cities and without climbing to the top of the taxation and expenditure chart. Low property tax rates and public expenditures must be viewed with caution. In some circles, expenditures equals quality and investors look for communities that have invested in themselves and their futures. ■ FINANCING SOURCES This plan proposes an investment strategy that seeks to explore and develop new funding sources, partner with other providers and explore unique packaging to reduce direct public costs. A level of public investment is warranted and reinforces a broad spectrum of City goals and strategies. The City should work toward establishing a base investment to create a stable program that can help in attracting broader financial support and arrangements. Not all opportunities can be pursued. It is not practical to prepare a Land and Water Conservation (LAWCON) grant application that requires significant effort and offers limited promise. However, the converse is also true - to put all efforts into single source funding stifles creative solutions and provides the potential for volatility. A four legged approach is depicted here to achieve balance: 1. Property tax based investments. 2. Grants, donations and dedications. 3. Partnership and private providers. 4. Fees and entrepreneurs efforts. The level of effort in any particular arena is a policy choice. Capital improvements funding sources are constantly changing as public finance development activity, community attitudes and grant sources change. At least one part of the answer to the question of how much should be invested is what are the projected revenue sources and the implications of each. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11•12O • • • 11 FUNDING Three primary capital improvement funding sources have served the community over the last decade: • Park acquisition and development bonds - $4.4 million voter approved general obligation bond fund in 1984 scheduled to be redeemed in 2004. • Park and trail dedication fund. • Grants and donations. The status of the Park Acquisition and Development Fund (which includes the bond proceeds, park dedication fees, interest earnings and grants) at the end of 1993 was a $1.545 million balance. Committed and programmed investments could expect that fund to retain a $600,000 balance at the end of 1994. The fund received revenues of $700,000 in 1993 - $522,000 from dedication fees, $81,000 from investment earnings and $97,000 from grants. As subdivision of land slows with in -fill of limited unplatted areas, dedication fees will continue to diminish. The Park Trails Dedication and Construction Fund had a negative ending balance of -$70,565. That means this plan is not geared to the traditional role of allocating defined resources. It must also serve as a catalyst for determining the level of investment the City desires to make and the development of new revenues and funding sources. Just as the 1982 plan led to a commitment to fund park expansion, this plan should establish a strong foundation for on -going park investments. Again, the shortfall in revenue sources is not a precise number. Some of the land acquisition could come through dedication. Some of the development revenues could come from joint ventures such as the neighborhood park/schooVdeveloper project in the southeast corner of the City. However, a million dollars a year system improvement program will deplete current fund balances within one to two years. The City has invested in park expansion between 1982 and 1992 somewhere in the neighborhood of $14 million from the revenue sources enumerated. The City has also been active and successful at securing grants for a wide variety of projects. These grants span from street tree tube planting demonstrations to the Community Development Block Grant of $100,00 for facility development at Westcott Commons. Grant sources are also diminishing in numbers and amount while increasing in competition. The Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON), while still receiving significant revenues, has diverted those resources to other purposes with only one-third now being allocated to parks. In Minnesota, that oARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SAGAN, MN 11. 1 11 FUNDING now means something like $2 million is available to be allocated for all state and local qualifying projects in the metropolitan area. Clearly traditional revenue sources are shifting. And yet, at the same time, renewed recognition of environmental protection and parks is an important component of the landscape and particularly the cities. The President's Commission on the Outdoors, chaired by then Vice President Bush, established a progressive and collaborative program of corridors and linkages for the nation. Although still largely unfunded, having a plan in place which can respond to needs and opportunities places Eagan in a stronger position for funding eligibility. As noted, an important part of the parks program is some stability in base funding. Land and system improvements are carried at book value at the time of investment and are not appreciated or depreciated. That in -place park system investment now approaches $20 million with $11 million in land and $5 million in improvements. Two fundamental findings affect base funding options and levels. First, park investment has a direct relationship to property values. Hence, property tax based expenditures have the prospect of being at least partially self-supporting through increasing tax base values. Secondly, most improvements have a multiple year life which permits consideration of debt financing as well as annual revenue sourcing. Debt financing is always an issue for local governments. The following section examines that somewhat core topic in more detail. Pay -As -You -Go v. Debt Financing Pay-as-you-go financing for capital investments involves breaking projects or acquisitions down to manageable increments consistent with available and acceptable spending levels. Major projects would require building a reserve sufficient to cover the construction or acquisition budget. This approach is frequently used in municipal state aid road construction projects which accumulate annual state aid allocations until sufficient funds exist to construct the project. Developing a long term, reliable funding source is a difficulty. Most municipalities, Eagan included, do not fund depreciation accounts so that when assets expire, funding sources must again be developed. Another emerging funding approach is the development of an endowment by setting aside a portion of the revenue stream to be invested and using the annual or accumulated earnings to fund special projects. Eagan's Community Investment Fund has undertaken such an approach. Funding depreciation and establishing endowments will enhance future pay-as-you-go options. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; SAGAN, MN 11•5II • • • 11 FUNDING Debt financing is focused on investments which have a value greater and longer than the payment amount and schedule. Debt financing increases the cost of a project through added interest costs. The offsets are that current costs are likely to be Tess expensive due to inflationary pressures; that assets, particularly land, will appreciate in value not only making it less expensive to buy now but worth more in the future; and that debt is repaid with cheaper dollars again due to inflation. The advantage of debt financing in a rapidly growing community is the ability to keep pace with fast growing demands rather than waiting until funds can be accumulated. Passing a Bond Referendum This topic is raised gingerly in light of the on-the-job training garnered in past efforts.. Obviously, there is no sure fire formula other than to identify the voters needs and encourage them to authorize paying for it. If that formula could be made to work, all bond issues would pass. In Minnesota, getting out the message is even more problematic. Governments are limited to distributing factual information lest they be accused of spending taxpayers dollars to spend taxpayers dollars. The research done by the City in analyzing past bond defeats should hone in on some details on this emerging profile of the successful bond referenda. One piece of positive news. Bond issue approval rates in the seventies and early eighties when Eagan was passing its first parks bond issue were 65%. Since that 1984 Eagan approval rates have climbed to nearly 80%. Bond issues have to be structured very carefully. In some cases, denials are not rejections of the project only the approach to financing. A defeated bond issue to meet a critical infrastructure need could cause a backlash if other financing were obtained and the project initiated. Or conversely, rejection of the financing plan resulted in support for some other financing approach. Equally important, a failed bond issue for an important project could cause the community's bond rating to be downgraded since local officials are not able to deliver on important projects. In the tradition of the top ten list, the following represent some common identified ingredients of "tough sell", successful referenda: 1. Develop a clear statement of purpose for the project. 2. Form a community based organization to plan and carry -out a campaign. 3. Make people aware of what's going on. This is where the parks system should excel because it is a natural backdrop SARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11•23 11 FUNDING to "events" to heighten awareness like stock a fish, swing contests, t-shirts, bumper stickers, ice cream wagons and the like. The intent is to develop awareness, interest and curiosity. 4. Educate the voters. Now that you have their attention, what are the facts and needs to be met? 5. Sell benefits and distribute the message and benefits widely. 6. Gain support of affected governments and political leaders. 7. Finance the campaign adequately. 8. Run on performance and producing promised results. Again, the park system is the result of a met commitment. Showcasing that reliability is all important not only now but on future requests as well. 9. Work with the media. 10. Count the votes. As in all efforts, the project must be right and the process organized, financed and managed. Blending Financing Sources With Property Tax Based Revenues No singular approach is the answer. Again, this parks plan is based on forging new relationships and financial arrangements. For example, the City could buy a parcel or group of parcels within which an unspecified configuration of public use and public protection are desirable. The land could be offered for sale at a future date with development guidelines for integrated public use and protection areas. Establishing these areas in return could enhance the overall value of the property and resale could exceed the initial investment with the excess proceeds going to fund recreational facilities. Along the same lines, planning and integrating public use property into a private development project may reduce up front and financing costs for the developer. In exchange for these cost reductions, the City might request an equity interest in the project which could produce long term funding potential as the project value grows while generating on -going operating funds. Any debt financing by the City requires a source of revenue. Typically, a City repays bond proceeds from general property taxes or revenues derived from the facility. General obligation bonds are usually considered the least risky by the bond market and therefore are the lowest cost. Revenue bonds and other financing structures are more risky and therefore cost more in terms of interest paid to attract investors. Municipalities are rated by various municipal finance rating services on a number of demographic, economic and fiscal • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11 R4 • • • 11 FUNDING measures to establish a rating which sets the interest category at which bond purchasers will buy the certificates of indebtedness. In addition, state law restricts general debt to 2% of the City's property market value. Finally, debt per capita is tracked closely as an indicator of fiscal strength. Without significant elaboration on municipal finance policies, it is useful to look at Eagan's debt status in general terms. The City has $80 million of overlapping debt which includes its general obligation debt, the debt of other taxing jurisdictions (like the school districts) that is levied against local tax payers, and special assessments. The state imposed limit would be calculated at $42 million against the $11,800,000 general obligation debt on the books. The City, therefore, has $32 million of direct debt leeway which includes general obligation and special assessment bonds. Existing ratable debt amounts to about 1.3% of estimated property market value and represents about $679 per capita. Current national average per capita debt figures for cities between 25 and 100,000 population is about $630. Again, those components must be tempered by growth rates and underlying economic and tax bases. General obligation bond issues require a referendum vote of the electorate. Election results in the Twin Cities have been a mixed bag. A number of school and recreational facility bond proposals have been soundly defeated. Eagan's ice arena proposal is a case in point. However, School District 196's recent bond approval indicates some willingness to increase taxes for educational facilities. Mendota Heights passed a $3.4 million bond issue in 1989 for park acquisition and development. Maplewood voters approved $5 million for open space acquisition in 1992 and Eden Prairie voters strongly supported buying two unique natural resource parcels in 1994. Taking on debt and initiating bond referenda are important policy discussions for the City Council. But the big question is should property tax dollars be increased to fund land acquisition and park development and management. As outlined at the outset of this discussion, parks and open space along with their attendant facilities and programs accrue a number of broad reaching benefits for the City. One clear benefit is the enhancement of property values which points toward the property tax as a directly related revenue source to the benefit or service being provided. However, increasing property taxes through a referendum is not the only option available, if the property tax is viewed as a legitimate financing vehicle. And again keep in mind that BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; LAGAN, MN 'M•RS 11 FUNDING leveraging and partnering are key principles which reduce direct public expenditure to make the investment come to pass. Some alternative approaches would be to generally convert debt financing to lease financing and to utilize existing assets to raise investment capital. In the first instance, the City would work in forming a profit or non-profit group to construct, say, an entertainment center. The third party investors would determine a lease payment that would cover the costs of the improvement and other certifiable returns (such as return on equity, for example). The City would then make a lease payment with an option to buy or to acquire outright ownership at the end of the lease period. These are typically called certificates of participation and involve about 10% of the capital investment structure of local governments nationally. Care must be exercised in formulating the agreement to conform with legal limitations and tax implications for the investor group. This technique might have particular application for land acquisition through a third party such as the Public Lands Trust which can raise capital and/or secure financing (which might include property owner self financing through a contract for deed). The advantage of a third party is that land purchase can be negotiated without extensive cost increase pressures coming from a public pronouncement that property A is going to be purchased. The City then would enter into a lease or lease purchase arrangement for securing the property on a pay as you go basis. Again, keep in mind that an easement for protection of the resource and conditions of public access may be all that is needed instead of fee -simple ownership resulting in reduced costs. Again, the primary source of payment would be general property taxes. Another similar technique would be the conversion of an asset to capital. Again, a third party entity would be involved, but this time through the purchase and lease back of existing facilities. The third party would buy existing park property for a stipulated price and lease back terms. The City would then use part of the proceeds to lease back the property and the remainder to invest in other land and improvements. Depending on the sale proceeds and lease back arrangements, it is possible to limit the number of general fund property taxes that would be needed to cover the lease payments. Although much of this discussion relates to debt financing, the core consideration is establishing base financing through use of the property tax. That source will continue to provide a significant amount of the revenue for operations. The policy question is how much additional property tax should be devoted to parks investments. • • • OARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11 28 • • • 11 FUNDING The City ranks near the bottom in total property taxes assessed to a $90,000 home and at the low end of the spectrum in costs of general government and of parks and recreation per capita. Its assignable debt represents 1.3% of property market value and $679 per capita. Those benchmarks permit the City Council to examine the appropriateness of raising more money from property taxes to support parks, recreation and natural resource needs. Or, alternatively, asking the electorate directly to authorize more property taxes to pay for a prescribed program. • GRANTS, DEDICATIONS, GIFTS AND DONATIONS Grants come from governmental or institutional organizations, with supposedly larger view perspectives. The City of Eagan has been an aggressive and innovative grant proposal maker. Retrenchment of other governmental programs and foundations is noted. And yet the challenges mount. Efforts at expanding LAWCON are underway. The DNR has recognized the urban forest. US Fish and Wildlife has initiated programs for the Minnesota River Valley. The legislature has responded to regional park programs. Water Quality Management is receiving more attention and support. Clean air is back on the agenda. Cultural programming is recognized as a foundation for social harmony. Transportation funding now recognizes all modes of travel and the environment in which it occurs. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) now provides funding for transportation improvements beyond road widening and channelization. In short, new, broader objective, programs will surface from government and private grant makers. The City has comprehensive structure in place to respond to these financing sources. Benefactors - individuals, corporations, non -profits, service clubs, foundations, associations and other governments - represent an almost undefinable resource. Forget estate planning considerations which estimate that more wealth will exchange hands in the next decade than in the entire previous history of the country. This financial resource category requires preparedness, innovation, planning and risk taking. If any one has even the slightest interest in promoting the well being of the community through parks, there is an avenue which will save money and in some cases make it. Donations and gifts are both focused and unfocused. The service clubs, associations, businesses, and major land owners are clearly identifiable. Listing and dialoguing with these potential program funders may produce some valuable and productive results. The individual base is the most difficult to identify and reach. The emphasis here is to make needs known, work with various BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 11•I27 11 FUNDING local financial advisors and make the opportunities known. Whether it is the give Mom or Dad a tree for Christmas or a general assist in tax planning and gifting, the City must be prepared. Consider the person interested in or captured by a City parks program. A person with a high tax liability can help their community and their disposable income as well. Suppose someone bought a security or piece of property for $9,000 which is now worth $50,000. A gift of that $50,000 asset to the parks program could permit a $50,000 tax deduction even though taxes were never paid on the $41,000 appreciation. Providing information and connecting to tax advisors will put the City into the potential category at least. The Park Program Fund managed by the Town Centre Trust offers seeds of an opportunity program in this area. The Eagan Foundation is another receiver source. For the most part, gifts and donations are a case of having the mechanisms in place to capture the opportunity - planned improvements and facilities, gift and donation policies, publicity and public information, tax guidelines, and estate tax planning resources. The major choice for the staff and commission is the amount of resources which should be directed toward this effort. Even though some measure of control is lost to an independent, non-profit foundation, energizing a group could leverage staff time and public dollars and potentially serve individuals and businesses with an interest in community betterment. The accounting and fiscal controls are already in place for the $6,000 Parks Programs Fund. • PARTNERING/CO-VENTURES The changing nature of development and local government moves this area of potential funding into a major financial resource category. As mentioned repeatedly, a clearly defined public purpose can be accomplished in many different ways. Around the country there are numerous examples of public space in private ownership such as the redevelopment of the harbor and waterfront in Baltimore. This category extends beyond the matching grant concept to one of co -mingling of property, equity, improvements, and manage- ment participation. In some cases it involves looking for joint use opportunities while in others it means proactively stimulating development and parks improvements. Clearly, co -venturing requires extensively more management efforts, financial expertise and development agreement capability than purchasing a piece of property, making the site and facility improvements and scheduling the programs. And there are policy issues relating to first amendment rights, public access, and availability • • o BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN 'M-SS • • • 11 FUNDING to undesirables and the underclass. While not insignificant, these challenges will need to meet in other arenas anyway, so that addressing basic rights of access at the front can capture a broader and more cost effective set of opportunities. Some of the joint use opportunities revolve around creative scheduling, indemnification and site management to capture facilities which experience peak usage and then are under utilized. One example is business parking lots. These facilities have heavy daytime use but are largely vacant evenings and weekends. They could be in -line skating facilities, model car race tracks, bike courses,etc. With design input up front, the configuration of development sites could be arranged to promote community use. Another set of examples is in co -locating facilities to share common facilities. Again, the parking lot example is apropos where recreation facilities and a church share common parking each having more parking than they would individually, but less than if they provided for their own singular needs. Or the business campus ballfields and recreational facilities which could be programmed around company prime use and stimulated through design assistance, facility contributions, maintenance advice or scheduling assistance. The greatest barrier to these arrangements (aside from cost and location) is the complexity of the arrangements. Since it is new and requires integrated planning, it is easier to minimize the planning, develop a single purpose facility and let it run itself. Again, capturing these opportunities will require expanded expertise in forging agreements, designing complicated sites and managing activities to allay fears of preemption or exposure. The final group of potentials involves the co -venture concept where a series of City objectives can be accomplished. The current partnering example where parks staff engaged the school district and the residential developer to integrate park, school and private property into a configuration that serves the recreational needs of a broader spectrum of constituents at a reduced cost to all is one important example. Many of the park investments have involved a partnering relationship of one sort or another. The park dedications, to some extent, set the stage for moving from dumping the least developable property on the City to one where the park is integrated into the neighborhood subdivision, protects the natural resources and connects to the larger system. Acquiring key parcels of property that can be reconfigured to encourage private development as well as public use is another important leg to this financing category. Acquisition of property must necessarily meet the public purpose test, but if that property is viewed as enabling rather than rigidly providing, then BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAIVI EAGAN, MN 11.28 11 FUNDING some risk -venture opportunities can unfold. Again, reasoned caution is necessary as the City moves into non-traditional roles in facilitating community improvement and stewarding public tax dollars. Many of the remaining parcels of property in the City have some underlying difficulty, whether it be access, site conditions or speculation, that affect its development. Value is added by preparing land for development and installing supporting public improvements, including parks. Maybe the City wants to encourage higher density housing in conjunction with a transit hub. Because there are not many models, the City could partner with a design and participation in the organizing public and green spaces, ultimately disposing of some or all of the direct public ownership in exchange for improvements, access and perhaps a cash contribution. The examples are virtually without limit and reasonably complicated. The first question is one of policy - should an entrepreneurial partnering development role be established for the City? Then the question moves to sites with potential in each of the areas discussed and a process for engaging private and other government interests. Somewhat tangentially related to this category is tax forfeited properties. The City could request a list of tax forfeitures from the county as these properties exist or become forfeit. Reviewing the properties in light of plan objectives, the City could request the county to designate eligible properties as "conservation" to prevent their sale at auction or over the counter. Immediate decisions with respect to transfer of title could be placed into the overall site evaluation process. For the City to acquire the property, the county as agent for the state, would be required to consult with the Commissioner of Natural Resources. Although the amount of land that will be forfeit is not likely to be significant, it is usually land with some development impairment - steep slope, unusual shape, rock outcroppings, bad soils, etc. A routine process of evaluation may produce some unexpected results and at the minimum protect opportunities until further investigation can occur. Finally, a major funding source is the provision of facilities by others - non -profits, businesses and associations. In some cases the City will recognize and stimulate interest. In others, the City would be supportive in promoting. The City could also program such as the church gymnasium or coordinate the provision of services by offering reinforcing programs and overall management assistance. Examples include golf, gymnastics, bowling, racquetball, etc. Monitoring and involving the non-profit and commercial leisure service providers can be a major resource. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN' EAGAN, MN • 1•30 • • • 11 FUNDING • FEES AND ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES Fees and revenue producing activities have the most impact on the program, maintenance and operating budgets. Most public recreation programs are moving toward fee supported activities to reduce reliance on property tax support. Eagan fees are currently a small part of total expenditures. Some have advocated an enterprise approach to recreation. Enterprise funds are government's equivalent to a self contained business operation. The revenues support operations and net operating income return is distributed to facility investments or to the general fund. The key to an enterprise fund is that its revenues meet or exceed operating expenses. Making a swimming pool an enterprise fund when it costs $20,000 per year more to operate than it generates in revenues is not a good designation. An enterprise activity needs to be income producing. Current City enterprise funds include utilities - sewer, water, storm drainage and street lighting. A portion of the park and recreation system could consider being established as a utility/enterprise fund where user fees are levied on the basis of community use factors. Again the tie is between benefit received - opportunities to participate, cost savings and property value enhancements - and fee associated with that benefit. Minnesota has not done much with improvement districts or utility/enterprise approaches to general base funding for recreation. State law provides for an operating levy but says little about techniques applied to other essential services. A number of states including Iowa have well established improvement districts. California communities moved heavily into park assessment districts as the state restricted and then appropriated property tax revenues. This entire benefit district concept warrants consideration and appropriate legislative authority. Fees primarily support operations and reduce property tax support, a trend that is expanding. Any returns after expenses can be allocated to capital investments. Before identifying a few opportunities for generating fees as examples, a tabulation of some of the considerations in setting fees seems appropriate. In general, service expansion should be based first on service needs and not on the ability to increase revenue. Fees are not only to recover operating costs, but for control purposes to redistribute use, reduce vandalism and promote respect. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 111•31 11 FUNDING Each time a fee schedule is established, it must examine impact on policies, competition and financial implications. The cost recovery factors include: • Basic service - Is it a basic service for which costs should not be recovered (neighborhood park use)? • Partial recovery of erect costs - a small user group or expensive service which warrants some general support but cannot be totally covered by fees. • Recovery of all direct costs on fee based programs - this is current Eagan policy where all costs of directly providing the program - officials, materials, recreation specialists - are recovered. • Recovery of all direct and indirect costs - this approach acknowledges general maintenance and administrative overhead factors which are incurred by the programs and seeks to defray as much of the real and logically assignable costs as possible. This fee approach would generate surplus cash. • Differential fees - wherever fees are levied, it is appropriate to consider equity, need and access principles which would create differential fees based on economic need, access, and residency. Differential fees could also include fee waivers in predetermined circumstances. Fees can be placed into some major categories to again correspond with access and cost recovery policies: • Entrance fees - general access to large or mufti -purpose sites. This could include a parking fee or other type of self policing collection system. Permits or parking passes could be sold or issued to local residents with other paying a differential fee. • Admission fees - a discrete event or activity like an exhibit, play or similar special event. • Rental fees - exclusive right for a tangible property like the clubhouse or picnic shelter. • User fees - doing something with others like a ceramics class or a guided nature walk. • License/Permit fees - typically for staging an event to maintain control and liability coverage. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN• MN 11.32 • • 11 FUNDING • Special services fees - providing non -usual items like a VCR or sound system or special traffic control. • Sales - the sale of goods and service like fishing bait, guide services or food service. These fees primarily are geared to covering operating expenses. They can, however, stimulate use, provide control and create significant cash. Some ideas for additional revenue generation might include: • Piggy back with other recreation providers - discount bocce ball fees for all show patrons with ticket stubs. • Equipment rental/sales including fishing poles, bait, maps, bicycles, wheelchairs, strollers. • Sell season tickets to stimulate repeat business. • Sell tickets in strips to encourage multiple activities and get donations from unused tickets. • Establish a voluntary utility bill round up option with the excess proceeds going to park functions. • Include food concessionaires everywhere where at all possible. • Create coin operated adjunct facilities for before and after use such as batting cages. • Price leagues and facility usage to expand hours of use. Friday evening soccer fields are 10% of week night soccer fields/league charges for example. • Develop park related and Iogoed products - bags, umbrellas, score pads, t-shirts, sun visors, etc. • Publish guides to parks, nature observation, tree identification, exercise, etc. • Sell on the spot cameras everywhere to capture the "action", "event". • Organize community exhibits - art fair, craft week, artist night out, etc and rent exhibit space as well as charge admission. BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAGAN, MN 11.33 11 FUNDING • Develop coop advertising with product providers in exchange for exclusive rights or donated equipment. • Create service packages - fishing and guide service, tree planting and pruning, educational travel packaging, etc. • Video tape lessons and sell tapes. These programming, promotion and fee ideas are to stimulate use as well as generate fees. Popular commercial ventures include video outlets, arcades, pizza, games of change, and a whole raft of emerging electronic and computer based activities. Rather than addressing the competition factor, the City might license these recreational pursuits to augment park attractiveness and retain a portion of the income earned. • FINANCING SUMMARY Four major categories of capital funding sources have been examined. Many of the approaches discussed are non- traditional and intended to broaden the range of choices for meeting extensive and expanding needs in the face of increasing reluctance to support activities with tax dollars. The general summary is co -investing with all of the sectors of the community in strengthening the natural resource, park and recreational base. One additional organizational funding option is also worth considering - the establishment of a venture or opportunity fund. The fund would be controlled by defined policies, but would allow the city to try new ventures or respond to special opportunities triggered by unanticipated events. This could have particular application in land acquisition where parcels exhibit certain plan qualities and objectives, come up for sale, and need to be acted upon directly or through a land trust or other acquisition approach with reasonable dispatch. If all property acquisition funds are raised by a bond issue for specific parcel, these opportunities may be lost. Currently, capital funds fall short of planned acquisition and development needs identified in the plan. New sources, resources and arrangements are necessary to keep Eagan's system of public leisure time resources at the cutting edge. • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 11.34 • System Vision Statement • CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • 12 VISIONING CHAPTER 12: SYSTEM VISION STATEMENT ■ INTRODUCTION A look ahead to the future of the Eagan Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource System "To preserve and enhance ecologically diverse open space throughout the City of Eagan, continue parks development and provide high quality active, educational opportunities to meet current and future needs and interests of a diverse and changing population." This report and the resulting plan serve as the basis for achieving the adopted mission of the Park, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Commission. The system plan takes a balanced approach providing for natural resource protection and interpretation; park acquisition and development; maintenance; recreation program deployment; and rehabilitation/renovation activities. A number of companion implementation and financing actions were also identified. Major trends affecting leisure time in general and Eagan specifically were discussed in some detail in chapters on demographic trends and recreational programs. No singular vision for Eagan's leisure time facilities and programs exists. Rather, the future is a dynamic interaction of: • Demographic trends • Existing investments • Cooperative ventures • Availability of time and money • Educational needs • Environmental concerns • Personal and community safety • Technology Will there be a rebirth of community or will individual needs and spontaneous availability of facilities and services continue to prevail? Will leisure time expand or contract? Will the cost of the activity be paramount or will the availability and quality of the experience prevail? Will organized recreation be supplanted by BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN, MN 1E-1 12 VISIONING individual and spontaneous events? What role will emerging technologies play? Of course, we can only speculate as to the likelihood of one path or another. The key is to devote time to an ongoing long range planning process and to monitor and interpret trends as they occur, refashioning the system in a responsible way. How people spend their time and money will continually shape the park and recreation system and agenda. One such future is based on the changing relationship between work and leisure: • Work has been at the core of human organization. It is becoming disassociated with leisure pursuits. Occupations are not predictors of recreational interests. • At the same time, leisure is playing a more central role in allocation of time. Leisure becomes a focus instead of a relief from work. People value leisure more. • Independence from all forms of control and standardization leads to a desire for decentralization of activity, government, and information. Examples are the outbreak of specialized publications, the spread of personal computers, and the efforts for neighborhood control. A number of conditions are likely to guide the future park system in Eagan as pointed out earlier. Select Eagan highlights include: • Population will continue to expand, adding another 20,000 people over the next 20 years. • Present residents will stay in the community longer, increasing the number of older adults and seniors. • Youth will continue to be a significant number of people, but declining percentage of total population. The future vision of leisure will be influenced by some significant existing and emerging trends and challenges: • Government determination of program offerings will be more complex and require a more grass roots analysis of needs. Definitions of what a park or playground is will change ever more quickly and be influenced by those in its service area. • • BARTON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 1 -R • • 12 VISIONING • An end to the regular rhythm of the day where work and leisure time interval selections will be more discretionary. Service organizations will need to be increasingly flexible as to when, how often, and how long programs will be offered. • Changing technologies will influence operations and expand electronic entertainment. • Technologies will broaden access as communications and safety and information offer more individualized choice and personal security. • A common popular culture will become increasingly fragmented with changing communication devices. • Increasing interest in learning and environmental awareness and preservation will be experienced. • Internalization and cultural diversity will expand. • Holistic health trends will transcend leisure services. • Prevention emphasis will expand to assist in reducing social problems. • Educational and religious purposes will focus many leisure time pursuits. • Energy availability/cost and general household economics will find more recreation being shifted to the backyard and neighborhood. • Ownership of things will decline as more interest is focused on interaction with others. These trends are shown in Table 12.1 to portray the potential impacts on the local recreation provider. ■ SYSTEM DIRECTIONS So, what does this plan begin to do to shape that future? First, it builds on the existing system's established strengths. 1. Innovative programs focusing on neighborhoods, youth, and outdoor recreation. 2. A high quality park system which is readily available, provides quality experiences, has easy access, and is well maintained. 3. A showcase for quality facilities and materials. 4. Parks programs underscored by personal staff hospitality and efforts to connect to users and visitors. 5. Building of partnerships with schools; private/non-profit; and associations. BARTON ASCWMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN4 MN IR.3 12 VISIONING 6. An effective strategy of phasing of development and investments to coincide with neighborhood development trends. The system plan includes a number of pieces that are knit together in a vision for the future of the city. The park system plan: • Recognizes the importance of protecting, preserving, and interpreting natural resources. • Continues the focus on neighborhood parks and recognizes they will be reconfigured as interest and demographics change. • Links all portions of the system together in a working set of pathways, bikeways, and greenspaces. • Recognizes and links to education, private, and non-profit leisure resources. • Capitalizes on the unique qualities offered by the Minnesota River Valley, Lebanon Hills, Minnesota Zoological Gardens, and other regional facilities. • Looks to joint provision of facilities in conjunction with the school district, non-profit agencies, and private commercial ventures. • Works to engage residents and youth in building neighborhoods and strong community. • Expands traditional youth and athletic programming to adult and cultural activities. The City of Eagan has a number of potential special facilities that can be incorporated into the leisure vision: • Patrick Eagan Nature Interpretive Center • Caponi Sculpture Garden • Public Play Golf Courses • Holz Historical Farm • Quality Fishing Lakes • City Center Plaza • Band Shell • Community Activity and Aquatic Center • Ice Arena These public emphasis facilities in concern with private and non- profit programs offer an exciting and interconnected array of places and activities for Eagan's leisure future. • • • BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN{ EAOAN, MN IR-4 • • • 12 VISIONING TABLE 12.1 EAGAN PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICE MODEL CONTRASTS Service Element Traditional Future Oriented Distribution of Services Equal services to all residents. Programs and services based on social and economic need extended beyond traditional recreation. Program Offerings Selected list of popular, accepted activities. Enable and serve as catalyst for identifying and matching programs to citizens' needs. Provider Role Direct staffing in City owned facilities. Help residents develop own leadership skills and provide at any community site. Funding Primary property tax allocations. Variety of sources including taxes, fees, barter, partnerships, co -investment. Program Planning Staff responsibility updating past programs and introducing selective new. Widely shared planning process based on careful evaluation of community needs and participation. Budgeting Budgets based on historical expenditure precedents. Budgets based on program needs and measurable results. Outcomes Attendance and participation figures. Human consequences and responses. Source: Barton-Aschman, Resolution Tnc. EAFITON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 1 .5 12 VISIONING • VISION SKETCH The amount of additional active park acreage to be acquired in Eagan will gradually stabilize with moderate amounts needed for athletic, neighborhood park, and community park functions. Passive open space should be added to provide natural resource presentation and relief from an increasing population. In formulating a vision sketch for the park system, the need becomes apparent for additional greenway corridors that Zink park and open space areas. In effect, these corridors reinforce vehicle, bike and pedestrian movement within the community. In reality, the corridors strengthen the community's quality of life and reinforce neighborhood pride. Economic and environmental benefits would also be realized. The principal corridor concept builds upon elements already present in Eagan; generous roadway cross -sections, utility corridors, park land, and open space. Additional open space and right-of-way may be required, however, these parcels are segments rather than entire corridors. Two corridor types should be considered, including: 1. Boulevard or Parkway Corridors — Select existing roadways should be enhanced with canopy tree plantings, lighting, signing and trails. Adequate right-of-way exists to accommodate the changes. Roadway corridor improvements would significantly enhance community visual character and serve as integral linkages for a looping trail system and open space connection. Implementation will require the cooperation of the Dakota County Highway Department and Eagan Public Works. 2. Greenways — An independent, off -road corridor trail network exists within Eagan that could be strengthen to provide a backbone system interconnecting individual park element. In form, the independent trails should employ generous right-of-way with vegetative buffers separating adjacent development and inconsistent land uses. Natural resource areas such as woodlands and water basins should be used where possible. Multiple use trails complimented by special lighting, signing, furniture, and rest areas should be included. Abandoned rail right-of-way, utility right-of-way, and corridor easements in coordination with future parcel acquisition should be employed. Short segments of roadway corridor may be utilized, however, these should have special treatment. Greenway implementation will require the cooperation of federal, state, county, and city departments in addition to private utilities. • • • ■ARTON ASCHVIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAOAN, MN 1111-8 • • • 12 VISIONING Potential boulevard and greenway corridors are shown on Figure 12.1 in relation to other park and open space components. If completed, this system would crisscross the city, knitting together and connecting primary park and open space elements. In addition, access would be increased to regional open space and to adjacent community trails. Community residents would have closer proximity to open space elements. Priorities for system implementation should initially focus upon right-of-way and parcel acquisition. Infrastructure and reforestation should follow with user amenities added when funding is available. Implementation will require a common focus of all city departments. While these corridors may appear as today's vision, they would have tremendous benefits for Eagan's future. The vision is not impossible! Continuous incremental implementation can be realized if community leaders, related agencies, and private parties grasp the benefits and collectively respond. This planning document provides a comprehensive inventory, review and analysis of the existing park, recreation and natural resources within the City of Eagan. Recommendations contained within the plan are an outgrowth of the planning process and are intended to provide a road map for the park system's continued development, program use, and capital improvements into the next century. YARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLAN; EAGAN. MN 12.7 12 VISIONING BATON ASCHNIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARK SYSTEM PLANT EAOAN, PAN IMAM r 0-494 )L c W E *. . • • 0 114 1/2 3/4 MILES * r * # • FORT •* $ SNELLING * • STATE BLOOMINGTON PARK • RIVER HILLS CINNAMON CEDAR POND HILL RWGECLIE LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK APPLE HIGHVI UNNAMED ..N • .IGHTS COUNTRY HOME Ademess Run GEORGE OHMANN MENDOTA , HEIGHTS LEXINGTON WESCOTT COMMONS MUELLERI , FARM f WALNUT HILL ��MLW 2OSE 4OUN WESCOTT STATION • • uLE RIDIE . - '404 +r. C�.. BUR OAKS CAPTAIN DODD 12 SYSTEM VISION FIGURE 12-1 Park System Vision Plan LEGEND MEN PARKLAND UNDEVELOPED OPEN SPACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL SIDEWALK TRAIL OFF ROAD TRAIL STATE TRAIL REGIONAL TRAIL BOULEVARD OR PARKWAY CORRIDOR GREENWAY CORRIDOR PARK SYSTEM PLAN, EAGAN, MN '1>Z - 9 • Appendix • t CITY OF EAGAN PARK SYSTEM PLAN • • • • APPENDIX SUGGESTED DESIGN STANDARDS FOR TRAIL CONSTRUCTION The following design standards are intended to guide the future construction of trails in Eagan. These standards should be used to direct detail design for municipal trail construction and improvements. Difficult trail design issues frequently exist, and they may require special design consideration. Individuals using the design standards must review on a case -by -case basis whether the design conflicts require deviation from the standards. In arriving at such exceptions, attention should be given to issues pertaining to user safety, liability, comfort, construction costs and consistency with abutting trail segments. Bicycle Dimensions and Operating Characteristics The space requirements for safe and comfortable bicycle operation are dictated by the following three factors: 1. Dimensions of the bicycle and rider 2. Operating characteristics 3. Bicycle clearances Dimensions of the Bicycle and Rider The actual dimensions of the bicycle and rider serve as the starting point for developing minimum bicycle facility design standards. Though bicycle dimensions may vary slightly with model and size, the standard dimensions of the average adult rider and his or her bicycle are shown in Table 8.2 and Figure 8.1. TABLE 8.2 BICYCLE AND RIDER DIMENSIONS Characteristics Average Dimension (Feet) Width 2'-0" Measured by handlebar width Length 6'-0" Height 7'-4" Minimum Vertical Pedal Clearance 0'-5" A-1 Ore 2' 5.75' FIGURE 8.2 BICYCLE AND RIDER DIMENSIONS Bicycle Operating Characteristics The speed at which a bicyclist travels may vary according to several factors including: 1. Route geometrics 2. Surface condition 3. Type and characteristics of the bicycle 4. Physical fitness and proficiency of the rider 5. Weather and related conditions 6. Trip purpose Though it is possible to attain speeds surpassing 30 mph on a bicycle, normal cycling speeds range from 7 to 20 mph and average 15 mph. Accordingly, 15 mph should be considered the absolute minimum design speed for bicycle facilities with 25 mph recommended as a desirable working design speed. Where rolling terrain and significant downgrades greater than five percent are prevalent, a higher design speed should be considered. Due to the speeds that can be reached on significant downgrades, curves on downgrades are not recommended. Bicycle Clearances Perhaps the most critical factor in developing safe and comfortable bicycle facilities is the provision of adequate clearance to a wide variety of potential obstructions that may be found A-2 • • • • • • along a prospective route. Standards for lateral and vertical clearance are particularly important in view of the wide range of riding proficiency found among riders. Clearance consideration must include: 1. Normal bicycle maneuvering allowances 2. Lateral clearances to static obstructions 3. Lateral clearances to dynamic obstructions 4. Vertical clearances to overhead obstructions Minimum and desirable clearance standards for safe and comfortable bicycle operation are indicated in Table 8.3. It should be noted, however, that these standards are minimum recommendations. Where possible, additional space should be provided to permit passing within the bikeway and to allow more adequate hazard avoidance. For example, the door of a parked car could extend over four feet into a bike lane (normal extension is about three feet). A three-foot lateral clearance plus one foot maneuvering space will not provide adequate space for comfortable and safe passage around this obstruction. Width Trails shall be 8'-0" (minimum) with select trails of 10'-0" wide bituminous to accommodate two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic. A 2'-0" wide grass shoulder on each side should be provided for maneuvering allowances. Bikeway Grades The grades over which bicyclists can be expected to safely and comfortably travel depend on a number of factors, including: 1. General topography 2. Length of the grade 3. Proficiency of the bicyclist 4. Characteristics of the bicycle 5. Route surface conditions 6. Seasonal use and weather related conditions Because of the variability of these factors, it is difficult to establish detailed and absolute design standards for determining bicycle facility grades. Existing recommendations on acceptable grades generally suggest that grades greater than five percent should be avoided wherever possible. Where terrain dictates, grades over five percent and Tess than 500 feet long are acceptable when a higher design speed is used and additional width is provided. The relationship between grades and their length should be viewed as a major A-3 TABLE 8.3 BIKEWAY CLEARANCE STANDARDS Type of Clearance Minimum Standard (feet) Desirable Standard (feet) Maneuvering Allowances' - each outside edge - between bicycles regardless of direction 0.75 1.50 1.00 2.50 Lateral Clearance to Static Obstructions2,3 - utility poles, trees, hydrants, etc. - raised curb - curb drop-off - sloped drop-off - soft shoulder 0.80 0.50 1.50 0.80 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.50 Lateral Clearances to Dynamic Obstructions° - parked cars 2.00 3.00 Vertical Clearances to Overhead Obstructions 8.50 9.00 Maneuvering allowances should be provided for by additional bikeway pavement width, as specified. 2Lateral clearances can be provided for by either additional bikeway pavement width or separation. It is recommended that these clearances be provided for by simple distance separations, where possible. 3In cases where lateral hazards or obstructions are of extreme severity, such as steep drop-offs or heavy vegetation, clearances should be provided as liberally as possible beyond the minimum standards cited. Some type of additional barrier may also be appropriate depending on the degree of danger. °Includes motor vehicles but desirable clearance will vary dependent upon vehicular speeds. Clearance between bicycles and moving vehicles should be as liberal as possible. A-4 • • • consideration in bikeway development. Table 8.4 indicates both the recommended maximum and desirable lengths to which bicycle facility grades should be limited. As a general rule, the maximum gradient for a long uphill slope should not exceed two percent (for short sections, five percent might be allowable). Grades steeper than three percent may not be practical for bicycle paths with crushed stone surfaces. TABLE 8.4 BICYCLE UPHILL GRADE AND GRADE LENGTH CRITERIA Bikeway Gradient (percent) Desirable Length (feet) Normal Length (feet) Maximum Length (feet) 10.0 Not Recommended 33 66 5.0 Not Recommended 131 262 4.5 82 167 334 4.0 102 203 410 3.5 148 295 590 3.3 148 295 590 2.9 200 400 800 2.5 262 525 1,050 1.7 590 1,180 --- 1.5 --- 2,100 --- Recommended Curves The design of bikeway curvature is dependent upon the average rate of travel of the cyclist. An increased rate of travel due to downhill slope requires a longer radius of curvature. For design purposes, a speed of 10 mph is good to use in setting criteria for the curvature of bikeways. Horizontal Alignment and Superelevation The minimum radius of curvature negotiable by a bicycle is a function of the superelevation rate of the bicycle path surface, the coefficient of friction between the bicycle tires and the bicycle path surface, and the speed of the bicycle. the minimum design radius of curvature can be derived from the following formula: A-5 v2 15 (e+f) where: R = Minimum radius of curvature (ft) V = Design speed (mph) e = Rate of superelevation f = Coefficient of friction Curve data from Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1991. An added approach to making bikeway curves more safe and comfortable may include providing some degree of superelevation or banking on all horizontal curves. (Superelevation relates to the slope of the banked segment in terms of the amount of vertical rise at the outside edge versus the width of the surface.) Some superelevation is advisable on such curves, but in the absence of available data for determining these rates, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials recommends that a cross slope of 0.02 feet per foot be established as an absolute minimum (the minimum rate required for drainage) and that 0.05 feet per foot be used as a maximum design value. Finally, it is suggested that widening the pavement width on curves be considered to provide increased safety and comfort. By doing so, the tendencies of the bicyclist to "lean into" turns and stray from the centerline can be accommodated without jeopardizing either actual or psychological safety or comfort. Prior to undertaking a curve -widening project, however, the added costs of such a project should be evaluated to firmly justify the need for such special treatment. The coefficient of friction depends upon speed; surface type, roughness, and condition; tire type and condition; and whether the surface is wet or dry. Friction factors used for design should be selected based upon the point at which centrifugal force causes the bicyclist to recognize a feeling of discomfort and instinctively act to avoid higher speed. Extrapolating from values used in highway design, design friction factors for paved bicycle paths can be assumed to vary from 0.30 at 15 mph (24 km/h) to 0.22 at 30 mph (48 km/h). Although there are no data available for unpaved surfaces, it is suggested that friction factors be reduced by 50 percent to allow a sufficient margin of safety. Based on a superelevation rate (e) of 2 percent, minimum radii of curvature can be selected from Table 8.5. A-6 • • • • • • TABLE 8.5 MINIMUM RADII FOR PAVED BICYCLE PATHS (e = 2 percent) Design Speed-V (mph) (1 mph = 1.6 km/hr) Friction Factor-f Minimum Radius-R (feet) (1 ft = 0.3 m) 20 0.27 95 25 0.25 155 30 0.22 250 35 0.19 390 40 0.17 565 When substandard radius curves must be used on bicycle paths because of right-of-way, topographical, or other considerations, standard curve warning signs and supplemental pavement markings should be installed in accordance with the MUTCD. The negative effects of substandard curves can also be partially offset by widening the pavement through the curves. Stopping Sight Distances The degree of safety which a bikeway offers relates in part to how easily conflicting cross - movements are perceived, whether they be pedestrians, other bicyclists, automobiles, or animals. However, the ability of a bicyclist to react to specified cross movements is dependent on the stopping sight distance that is provided. Safe stopping sight distances are a function of bicycle speed and grade profile of the facility. Where this is not possible or feasible, consideration should be given to widening the path through the curve, installing a yellow center stripe, installing a curve ahead warning sign in accordance with the MUTCD, or some combination of these alternatives. Table 8.6 summarizes recommended stopping sight distances for various design speeds and gradients as developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A-7 TABLE 8.6 DESIGN STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCES FOR BICYCLES Design Speed (mph) Stopping Sight Distances for Downhill Gradients of: 0% (feet) 5% (feet) 10% (feet) 15% (feet) 10 50 50 60 70 15 85 90 100 130 20 130 140 160 200 25 175 200 230 300 30 230 260 310 400 Note: Design values for stopping sight distances on bikeways can be developed in the same manner as on highways. The values shown were based on the following factors and developed by AASHTO: coefficient of skid resistance perception -reaction time eye height object height At -Grade Railroad Crossing = 0.25 = 2.5 seconds 3.75 feet = 6 inches Whenever it is necessary to cross railroad tracks with a bikeway, special care must be taken to assure that the safety of bicyclists is protected. The bikeway crossing should be at least as wide as the approaches of the bikeway. Whenever possible, the crossing should be straight, and at right angles to the rails. For on -road bikeways, where a skew is unavoidable, the shoulder should be widened, if possible, to permit bicyclists to cross at right angles. Special construction and materials should be considered to keep the flangeway depth and width to a minimum. Pavement should be maintained, so ridge build-up does not occur next to the rails. In some cases, timber plank crossings can be justified, and can provide for a smoother crossing. Where hazards to bicyclists cannot be avoided, appropriate signs should be installed to warn bicyclists of the danger. For off -road bikeways, it is also desirable to cross at 90 degrees. When it is not possible to cross at 90 degrees, the bikeway should be widened to allow the cyclist to cross at as close to 90 degrees as possible. Drainage Drainage should be provided for all new hikeway/bikeways. Trails should be cross -sloped or crowned 0.02' to 0.03' per foot. In addition to drainage ditches, culverts may be needed for cross drainage. A-8 • • • • Materials Typical trail construction should conform with the trail cross section detail shown in Figure 8.4. Class V aggregate base should be used with a bituminous pavement in accordance with MnDOT 2341 Type 41. Adjacent trail shoulders may have optional sod shoulders 1'-6" to 3'-0 wide for erosion control. Sod should be lower than the abutting bituminous surface to encourage positive drainage. 8' - 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL 8'-0" MINIMUM 10'-0" PREFERRED (2) 1 12" ASPHALT 2331 TYPE 41 (FOR 8'-0" TRAIL USE ONE 2" LIFT) 1'-6" to 3'-0" SOD OPTIONAL -4" COMPACTED MnDOT CLASS V 11 ,.S ai,u il'� Q:�� SQ eiogiCX eao O°c03 �L� l{=lul�li�ll��{II Ui�tl_jlll�lK�Ut��ll[�1� BACKFILL lyti�11 BLACK DIRT COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10-0" MINIMUM u� 12'-0" PREFERRED tir rl 1'-6" to 3'-0" SOD OPTIONAL MAXIMUM SLOPE 3:1 NOTE: SOD LAID 6" TO 1'-0" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION FOR DRAINAGE FIGURE 8.4 TRAIL CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS A-9 Design Guidelines for Accessibility Trail planning should include accessibility for a wide range of disabilities and as with any visitor, a diversity of experiences on the trails. The trails are to be designed for the widest possible cross-section for the public. This will provide for individuals to use the trail together instead of "separating out" those who have disabilities, families with young children, and older people. The Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) provides a basis for developing appropriate standard for "an accessible trail." Not all trails can be designed to meet these recommended specifications, so a variety of trails should be provided in different settings and recreation areas. To make all trails conform to the standard for accessible routes of travel in every instance is neither feasible nor desirable. All individuals, including those who are disabled, desire to choose trails that provide different experiences and varying degrees of challenge and difficulty. Accessibility data from Design Guide for Accessible Outdoor Recreation, USDA, 1991. Three ability levels for trails exist (as defined by Design Guide for Accessible Outdoor Recreation., USDA, 1991). The Accessible trail may have grades up to 5 percent and can accommodate all people with disabilities. The more difficult Challenge Level 1 trail would have grades that exceed 5 percent but are less that 8.3 percent. The most difficult (Challenge Level 2) trails would not accommodate a large portion of disable people. These trails may contain grades that exceed 8.3 percent but are below 12 percent. One trail (or a portion of a trail) that conforms to the recommended guidelines for each ability level should be provided. The trails must meet a number of specifications shown in Table 8.7. At the head of each trail, "level of difficulty" details (in print and audio formats) should state the trail length, distance between rest places, handrails and/or edge protection, width (including width at points of obstruction), running slope, and surface material. An even more complete profile for a trail may be provided, when possible. A-10 • • • • TABLE 8.7 SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAILS AND PATHWAYS Accessible Challenge Level 1 Challenge Level 2 General Pathways are the pedestrian connections between facilities or activity areas. The entire length of a pathway must meet or surpass the guidelines for its ability level. The length of a pathway is the distance between two facilities such as a parking area and a fishing dock. The width of a pathway is the narrowest clear dimension along its length. A pathway that averages 5 feet across but narrows to 3 feet is defined as a 3-foot path. Distances Distances between facilities will vary widely from site to site. The recommended distances are reasonable maximum distances for each ability level. A much shorter distance will often be desirable, particularly at Accessible sites. Grade 1:20, 5% max. 1:12, 8.3% max. 1:8, 12.5%, not to exceed 200 ft. Width 1-way, 4 ft.; 2-way, 5 ft. 32 in. min. 32 in. min. Cross -slope 2% max. 2% max. 3% max. Gates Gates must have a clear 32-inch opening. Clear approach space must be provided. Surface Hard surface. Very firm, compacted surface. Natural surface, passible in a wheelchair. Edge Provide 2-inch curb on downhill side. Provide 2-inch curb on downhill side at dangerous and difficult locations. Not defined. Curbs/railings Provide 32-inch railings at dangerous and difficult locations. Detectable area The detectable area is the area of space within which a visually impaired person, using a cane, can detect an obstacle. No obstacle may overhang the edge of a pathway by more the 4 inches, if the bottom of the obstacle is more than 27 inches above the walking surface. Tactile warnings Tactile warnings on walking surface should be provided at locations that are potentially dangerous to people with severe visual impairments, such as crosswalks/water areas. "Shoreline" If curbs or handrails are not provided, one side of path should have a distinctive edge to serve as a "shoreline" for cane users. Rest areas 200-300 ft. max. 100-200 ft. max. At reasonable distance --not closer than 200 or 300 ft.; consider natural level spaces. Maintenance Maintenance is important so that the pathway is not degraded by weeds, cracks, or erosion. A-11 Bridges, Underpasses, and Pedestrian Crossings Before any type of major pedestrian crossing is considered, a traffic study including a cost/ benefit analysis should be conducted for the proposed facility. The three primary types of pedestrian crossings are: 1. At -Grade: A. No delineation or signs. B. With sign -delineation with pavement markings. C. With sign -delineation with flashing lights. 2. Overpass: A. This would be a bridge structure over the roadway, usually mid -block. 3. Underpass: A. This would be a culvert -type structure under the roadway, usually mid -block. (Use is very limited due to topography). Thresholds which call for further evaluation of a pedestrian crossing facility are: 1. Traffic Volumes (Vehicles) A. A Peak -Hour Traffic of 800 Vehicles/Hour. B. A Daily Traffic of 5,000 Vehicles/Hour. 2. Pedestrian Volumes A. 150 pedestrians per hour for two hours on a typical day. Once a possible pedestrian crossing need is indicated, a more in-depth traffic study should be undertaken. At a minimum, the study should include the following: 1. A capacity analysis of the adjacent roadways and intersections. 2. The average running speed and posted speed limit on the adjacent roadways. 3. An analysis of the type and amount of traffic which would use the facility (i.e., bikes, pedestrians). 4. The average pedestrian delays, if a crossing already exists. 5. The time of day and day of the week when the heaviest pedestrian traffic would occur. A-12 • • • • • 6. An analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance (gap study of existing traffic). 7. A sight distance analysis for the roadway traffic and pedestrian traffic. 8. The spacing of controlled intersections. 9. The existing and protected land uses in the area to determine future pedestrian traffic. 10. The accident history in the area. 11. The peak -hour and average daily traffic in the area, both existing and protected. If the detailed traffic study indicates a pedestrian crossing facility is needed, the next step should be to conduct a cost/benefit alternative analysis to determine the best pedestrian facility opinion (i.e., at -grade signal, overpass, underpass). Although each facility location design should be evaluated separately, minimum design standards should be maintained. They are as follows: 1. 8'-0" wide - two-way pedestrian only trail. 2. 12'-0" wide - two-way pedestrian/bike trail. 3. 12'-0" wide - two-way pedestrian only overpass/underpass. 4. 12'-0" wide - two-way pedestrian/bike overpass/underpass. 5. 5 percent maximum grades. 6. 30 mph design for bike trails. 7. Handicap accessible. The analysis and design of any pedestrian facility should use standards found in the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "Green Book" A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. The evaluation of pedestrian crossings is very subjective and each case should be analyzed on its own. The preceding criteria stated are not standards, but guidelines to facilitate a sound engineering solution to the situation. A-13 Design Considerations for In -Line Skate Trails The increasing number of in -line skaters requires the safe integration of skaters into pedestrian, bicycling, and vehicular societies. Trail data provided by the International In -Line Skating Association (USA) suggested width for combined one-way bike and skate trail is shown on Figure 8.5. 5' PEDESTRIAN BrIUMINOUS TRAIL 1'-0' to 3'-0' SOD OPTIONAL BACKFILL BLACK DIRT 5'-O COMPACTED SUBGRADE 7-0' 1'-6' to 3'-0• SOD OPTIONAL MAXIMUM SLOPE 3.1 NOTE: SOO LAID 6' TO 1'-0' BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION FOR DRAINAGE Combining bicycle trails with skating trails is the most cost-effective. • An 8-foot travel lane and a 2-foot 6-inch passing lane is the minimum requirement to provide room for some swaying or skating two -abreast. • A 10-foot total width is preferred in heavily -used areas. • Separate trails from traffic lanes with a 2-foot minimum fall zone. Speed Considerations The IISA suggests the same relationship of curvature to speed as used for bicycle trail designs. Design speed should be 15 miles per hour in open level terrain and 20 miles per hour for downhill grades over 5 percent. In urban conditions, a design speed of 15 miles per hour is adequate except where there are steep downhill grades. Drainage Requirements • Pitch 2 percent to one side or crown the trail. • On cut -sections, pitch to hill for catchment in ditches. • Wide planted swales are preferable to dissipate run-off. • Avoid grates with wide slits, run slits perpendicular to path. A-14 • • • • • Sight Distances Sight distances for skating trails need to be at least as great as for a car traveling at the same speed. Design Standards for Cross -Country Ski Trails Introduction Cross country skiing is currently undergoing a major change in style, or technique. Traditional style, also known as tracked or diagonal, is slowly giving way to skate skiing. Both methods remain popular and therefore must be accommodated in trail layout and grooming. General Dimensions Ski touring, like hiking, reflects just the dimensions of the person using the trail. In ski touring you must allow for the depth of the snow when providing vertical clearance. Suggested cross-country ski trail widths are shown in Figure 8.6. I I I I I I I I i I Slopes 8 - 30 % 6'- 8' Slopes Greater Than 8 % Slopes Greater Than 30% Trail width should be increased as slope increases. FIGURE 8.6 SUGGESTED CROSS-COUNTRY SKI TRAIL WIDTHS Grade Maximum for expert skiers--40 percent (short -run). Maximum practice slope--12 percent. Steep trails can be traversed to avoid dangerous runs. A-15 Avoid exhausting the trail user by providing sections of level trails in trail areas with many slopes. Trails should provide a variety of terrain. A trail should offer 1/3 uphill, 1/3 downhill, and 1/3 flat. Provide separation between two trail directions when on a slope. Exposure To get the longest and most comfortable seasonal use, avoid cold north winds. Attempt to direct trail use to the low, wind -protected and tree shaded, sun -protected areas. Also avoid areas of wind erosion and wind slab (hard wind -packed snow.). Trails should also be laid out to hold snow. Methods of achieving this are: 1. North -facing slopes; avoid south -facing slopes where possible. 2. Valleys. 3. Areas of vegetation. 4. Woods. 5. Tree lines. Trail Alignment Clear and widen the trail in areas of tums especially when they occur on a hill. Avoid any sharp corners. Provide adequate run -out at the bottom of all slopes to allow the skiers to slow down. Trail Length Recreational ski -touring trails should be set up in a loop system varying from one to three miles in length thereby allowing skiers optional distances. General trail classifications are: 1. Short loops 0-6 miles 0-10 km 2. Long loops 6-14 miles 10-23 km 3. System 15+ miles 27 km General Objectives Because ski touring is recreational in nature, trail facilities should provide a variety of natural experiences. Successful trails will interweave open and wooded vegetation and flat and hilly topography. Rural lands are desirable for this quiet winter sport because they introduce fewer distractions and provide the skier with a better opportunity for solitude. Short trails around residential developments can be used for exercise or to link these communities with elements of the larger recreational ski trail system. A-16 • • • Trail Difficulty Rating • • • Easy: Slopes less than 10 percent Smooth turns. Trails clear of obstruction. Intermediate: Slopes less than 25 percent. Sharp turns with overshoot areas. Less than 1/3 of course is uphill. Advanced: Slopes less than 40 percent. Sharp curves. Rough trail surface. Signing Signing is important for indicating trail direction and giving important trail information, such as distance, difficulty, hazards, rules and regulations and locations of ski trail facilities. A trail head sign is important for showing length and direction of overall trail. Design criteria for cross-country ski trails are shown in Figure 8.7. . ONE WAY TRADtI'IONAL SKI wig TWO WAY TRADITIONAL SKI A-17 • ONE WAY TRADII'IONALAND SKATE SKI affeliojaliMititgli �'IJl1pN�l11�tn"��luullKluw�i�� TWO WAYTRADITIONALAND SKATE SKI �UU61(uN�ul�Ilu01111111V�D1uU�� FIGURE 8.7 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR CROSS-COUNTRY SKI TRAILS Trail Width 1. Heavy use trails should be wide enough for two persons to walk abreast (four feet). 2. Nature trails are little -used trails and can be half this wide (two feet). Vertical Clearance 1. Eight feet. Trail Length 1. Sidewalks and heavy use trails will be determined by destinations. 2. Nature and hiking trails should be set up in circuit routes, "figure 8" being desirable, allowing use of only half the trail without backtracking. A-18 • • • 3. These trails are intended for pleasure walking. 4. Trail length should be approximately two to four miles to provide a one to two-hour experience. An alternative of the 1-1/2 mile trail can providea pleasant, brief experience. Grade 1. On general hiking, trails should not exceed 15 percent. 2. Trails anticipating use by the handicapped should not exceed one percent. 3. Extreme steep slopes should be avoided if possible but can be negotiated by installing steps. 4. Hiking trails require very little special attention compared to other trail uses. Sharp curves, narrow widths and other natural obstacles such as logs and rocks do not present a particular hazard to hikers and can provide barriers to unwanted users. Surface Material 1. Urban and heavy use trails: asphalt or concrete. 2. Suburban and residential: gravel or wood chips. 3. Rural and nature trails: wood chips or natural cover. 4. Occasional wet areas can be filled with gravel. Constant wet areas should be avoided if possible, otherwise bridges can be installed or cat walks created by use of granular fill. A-19 .lei' f N•c.