03/19/2001 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Monday, March 19, 2001
7:00 PM
Eagan Municipal Center
City Council Chambers
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 pm
B. Approval of Agenda 7:02 pm
C. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001 7:04 pm
D. Visitors to be Heard 7:09 pm
E. Superintendent's Update and Department Happenings Pages 1-3 7:15 pm
F. Public Hearing re DNR Grant Pages 4-5 7:30 pm
G. Consent Agenda
(1) Blue Ridge 4th Addition- CSM Properties Pages 6-8 7:35 pm
H. Development Proposals 7:40 pm
(1)Thomas Woods- Manley Brothers Construction Pages 9-12
1. Old Business
(1) Skateboard Parks Update Page 13 8:05 pm
(2) Captain Dodd Park Sediment Mitigation 8:10 pm
J. New Business
(1) 5-year CIP, 2002-2006 Pages 14-15 8:20 pm
(2) Fish Lake Water Quality Project- Reclassification Pages 16-17 8:30 pm
of City Pond JP-47
K. Water Resources Update 8:45 pm
L. Other Business and Reports
(1) Central Park Master Plan 9:00 pm
(2) Conversion of Telephones Page 18-19
(3) Moonshine Park Update
(4) Attorney Response re Definition of Hardship
(5) Recreation Subcommittee Update Page 20
M. Round Table 9:40 pm
N. Adjournment 9:50 pm
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities,. facilities, and
employment without regard to race, color, creed religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation,
or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request
at least 96 hours in advance of the event. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received the City will attempt to provide the aids.
Next Advisory Parks Commission Meeting:
April 16, 2001
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
2001 MEMBERS
FNAME AND ADDRESS Release TERM TELEPHONE TERM
Phone # START EXPIRES
JOSEPH BARI Yes 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 1/2002
3033 Timberwood Trail (3 yr. 1999)
Eagan, MN 55121
MARGO DANNER Yes 2001 651/454-5688 (H) 1/2004
2037 Flint Lane
Eagan,MN55122
TERRY DAVIS Yes 1997 651-452-2635 (H) 1/2003
4895 Safari Pass (3 yr. 1997) 651-310-8941 (W)
Eagan, MN 5 5 1 22-2690 (3 yr. 2000) 452-2152 (Home fax)
terry.davis@StPaul.com
N. MARK FILIPI Yes May, 651-602-1725 (W) 1/2003
836 Overlook Place 1997 mark.filipi@metc.state.mn.us
Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr. 1998)
GEORGE KUBIK Yes 1993 651-452-3887 (H) 1/2002
3053 Pine Ridge Drive (3 yr. 1996) 612-713-5315 (W)
Eagan, MN 55121 (3 yr. 1999) George_Kubik@mail.fws.gov
DOROTHY PETERSON Yes 2000 651-454-6532 (H) 1/2003
4337 Sequoia Drive (3 yr. 2000)
Eagan, MN 55122
RICHARD PLETCHER (alternate) Yes 2001 651-687-9177 (H) 1/2004
1074 Northview Park
Eagan, MN 55123
JOHN RUDOLPH Yes 1993 952-454-8761 (H) 1/2003
1644 Norwood Court (3 yr. 1998) 952-707-2402 (Fax)
Eagan, MN 55122 952-707-2526 (voicemail) I 10/15/00
jrudolph@bumsvllie.k 12.mn.us
MELVIN WILLIAMS Yes 2001 651-994-6727.(H) 1/2004
823 Wescott Square
Eagan, MN 55123
DAVID WRIGHT Yes 2001 651-687-9336 (H) 1/2004
4671 Parkridge Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
Eagan City Staff E-Mail:
kvraaQci.eagan.mn.us cmeskoaci.eagan.mn.us polson aci.eagan.mn.us iasfahl ~-ci.eagan.mn.us
ghove ci.eagan.mn.us emacbeth@ci.eagan.mn.us bwielde@ci.eagan.mn.us
F Phone # 651-681-4661 (Cherryl's # after 4:30 p.m.)
4ko--, city of eagan MEMO
TO: Advisory Park Commission
FROM: Ken Vraa, Parks & Recreation Director
DATE: March 14, 2001
SUBJECT: Cover Memo Briefing: March 19, Commission Meeting
The March meeting will convene at 7:00 p.m. in the city council chambers.
Item E: Superintendents Olson and Asfahl will provide an update on departmental activities
over the last month.
Item F: As part of a DNR grant application, the city is required to hold a "public hearing" on
the application. A motion to close the public hearing and recommend submission of
the application is for consideration.. Superintendent Olson is the project manager
for this item.
Item G: One item on the consent agenda, and unless there are any question, a motion to
approve is in order.
Item H: The wetland and water quality submissions relating to the Thomas Woods
development by Manley Brothers Construction, was not submitted in a timely
manner. Although the submission was late, staff extended itself to complete a
review in order that this item could appear on both the commission agenda and the
City Council agenda on March 20. Because of the limited time, the submission
report may be lacking in some detail as ti is being "rushed" to get the information
into the packet.
Item I: Staff will provide a brief update on the planning status of the Skate park issue. A
brief memo has been provided.
Item J: 1) The Acquisition and Development sub committee met in February to review the
next five year CIP for Parks from the park site acquisition fund. Their
recommendation is enclosed. If approved, this item will be forwarded to the City
Council or may be part of a joint Commission/Council agenda.
2) Water resource Coordinator MacBeth will review a proposal to reclassify a water
quality pond, which staff believes was initially inappropriately classified. This pond
has been used as a treatment basin for the fish lake water quality project. Staff is
recommending approval of this reclassification. A complete staff report is included
in the packet.
Item L Several item appear as updates to the commission. At this time, none of the items
require commission action.
Respectfully Submitted
Ken Vraa
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
2001 MEETING SCHEDULE
NAME Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec )an
15 19 16 21 18 16 20 13 15 19 17 21
Joseph Bari X
Margo Danner X
Terry Davis X
N. Mark Filipi X
George Kubik X
Dorothy Peterson X
Richard Pletcher (alt) X
John Rudolph X
Melvin Williams X
David Wright x
X = present 0 = absent 0* = notified staff of absence prior to meeting
F-- WINNOW
Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee
John Rudolph N. Mark Filipi Joseph Bari
Melvin Williams George Kubik Dorothy Peterson
David Wright Terry Davis
Margo Danner
Richard Pletcher
UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES
1. Commission Review Workshop
2. Spring Maintenance Demonstration
3. Review revenue sources in lieu of park dedication
4. Review Docks
5. Seasonal easement at top of Trapp Fame tubing hill
6. Wetland and Setback Buffers
7. Workshop to review packet format/content
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS- March
Recreation Division
• This past weekend, the Parks and Recreation Department participated in this years'
Home and Leisure Show at the Arena. Events such as this are a good opportunity to
showcase all that we have to offer.
• Scheduling of the fields for summer activity continues. Thus far there are 16 different
tournament events scheduled over 13 weekends.
• Recreation staff are busy developing activities for publication in the next Discover
activities brochure. This edition of Discover will be distributed to each Eagan residence
during the week of May 8th
• Eagan Seniors have enjoyed four weeks of Wednesday morning gatherings, and
hopefully will continue to add to the numbers each week. The kick off on February 28th
welcomed approximately 50 people to the Community Room. Since that time, there has
been a strong 15 to 20 people each week.
• The Babysitting/Latchkey Clinic is as popular as ever. The first session, offered March
10, was attended by 35 youth and the second session in April is expected to fill quickly
as well.
• While all outdoor skating facilities have been closed for the season, the Trapp Farm Park
Tubing Hill continues to hang on. With a good base of snow on the ground, the Tubing
Hill is open on a limited basis for the public. To date, the site will be open on Saturdays
and Sundays from 12:00 to 8:00 p.m. depending on weather.
• Softball registrations are still staggering in. Currently over 170 teams have registered to
play this summer.
• Registration will take place for tennis, co-rec sand volleyball and co-rec soccer leagues
in April and May.
• The golf program continues to expand each season. This summer youth golf camps and
parent/child golf leagues have been added to the program. The golf camps have been
popular with 4 out of 6 currently filled.
• Staff is gearing up to open the concession stand and to take delivery of the concessions
trailer for the upcoming softball season. This means interviewing staff, training,
cleaning, and purchasing product.
Parks Division
• To meets its long-term objective to have quality fishing opportunities close to every City
neighborhood, the Water Resources Division coordinates the aeration of priority
waterbodies every winter. This winter, Water Resources and Parks staffs have been kept
busy in this work. In recent years, mild winters have minimally depleted oxygen levels,
but extended ice and snow cover this winter has forced staff to juggle aerator equipment
from lake to lake. Furthermore, we have had several equipment breakdowns and repairs.
The City currently owns six aerators: one solar-powered, two pump and baffle, and three
air injection units. It recently picked up an additional air injection unit. To support its
objective, the Division will propose to acquire additional aerators over the next several
years, to put the City in a position of having adequate equipment for its priority
waterbodies.
• Water Resources, Forestry, Engineering, and Inspections staff will join county and state
soil and water conservation experts on March 22 in a City-sponsored all-morning
erosion control workshop for contractors, builders, and developers. The theme of the
workshop is "Working Together to Protect Our Wetlands and Natural Resources." City
Administrator Tom Hedges will welcome the group at 8:00 a_m. Main topics of
discussion will be: 1) Economic and Environmental Impacts of Soil Erosion; 2) State
and Federal Erosion Control Rules and Regulations; 3) Draft Erosion Control
Ordinance; 4) Tree Preservation; and 5) City Policy Review. Over 100 invitations were
sent out several weeks ago.
• In addition to the City's workshop, two other workshops on water resources-related
issues were held over the past several weeks. On February 27 at Hamline University,
Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth attended a session on Project NEMO.
Project NEMO (NNonpoint (pollution) Education for Municipal Officials) was developed
by the University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service to focus on local land
use decision makers. Its message is that water resources can be protected while
accommodating compatible growth. The workshop was sponsored by the Minnesota
Erosion Control Association, which is working with other agencies to implement a
Minnesota Project NEMO. On March 14 and 15, Macbeth attended a workshop in
Eagan entitled "Protecting Water Resources Through Low Impact Development." This
workshop covered conservation site design and low impact development concepts and
provided a technical review for engineers and designers and an administrative track for
planners and local officials. Some commissioners may recall the July 17, 2000
presentation by Jay Riggs on the Dakota County Low Impact Development Initiative.
• The Eagan Football Boosters will be holding its annual fertilizer sale Saturday, March
31. From 8 am. to noon, members of the Eagan High School football team will go door
to door selling a variety of lawn and garden fertilizers to raise money for the Eagan
Wildcats. This is the team's primary fundraiser for the year. Water Resources staff work
with the Boosters to help promote its efforts, particularly with fertilizers containing 3
percent or less phosphorus.
• All skating rinks were officially closed for the season on February 28th marking the end
of one of the longest skating seasons in memory. The Trapp Farm tubing hill will remain
open on weekends as long as conditions allow. The grooming of cross-country ski trails
has also been discontinued for the season.
• Staff has placed an order for SPRING fertilizer. Again this year a high quality, dust free,
low phosphorus fertilizer will be used. The use of high quality products has proven to be
worth the extra expense as the resulting healthy turf is out-competing many of the
unwanted weeds, reducing the reliance on pesticides. This spring staff intends to conduct
soil tests at a number of sites to help determine if the composition of the fertilizers is still
appropriate for the conditions.
• Again this year the Toro Company has expressed an interest in utilizing Eagan park
areas as test sites for its new mowers. They appreciate the high quality turf and large
expanses of park area. While the program has been beneficial for Toro and the City the
recent acquisition of a third high capacity mower will reduce the City's reliance on Toro
and ensure more consistent mowing of several critical areas. The City will continue to
utilize Toro for the mowing of several remote sites and has also referred them to the
school district to aid with the mowing of several of their large sites.
• The Dakota County Board will be reviewing the Lebanon Hills Master Plan at their
meeting of March 20th. At the meeting, County staff will be seeking authorization to
release the plan for a 30 day public review period. It is unknown at this time if they will
seek an official response from the surrounding Cities.
• During the last several weeks, members of the maintenance have attended training
sessions on the maintenance of mowers and the construction of retaining walls.
• The 2001 CIP includes funding for the replacement of 2 playgrounds. After reviewing
maintenance histories and discussing the issue with the staff members that conduct
inspections, Peridot path and Cinnamon Ridge have been selected for replacement. Both
are wooden structures over 15 years in age. The new structures will be ordered during
April to allow for installation during the summer. Staff will also be installing a
playground piece at Glacier Hills Elementary School in early June. School playgrounds
are considered to be "community" structures, helping to serve the recreational needs of
the surrounding neighborhoods. The School purchased the equipment through a fund
raising project.
• The Friends of the Farm met recently to discuss Holz Farm improvement projects for
this year. The Board decided to refurbish the roof of one of the existing storage
buildings and to repair the walls in the lower level of the barn. Funding for the projects
will again come from the tower rental revenues that were dedicated for Farm
improvements by the City Council. Any major improvements at the Farm will wait until
the completion of a master plan scheduled to be completed next year.
• Forestry and park staff recently removed a number of the large dead and down trees at
the new Central Park site. A large "skidder" was borrowed from the County to help pull
logs out of the low areas. Much of the wood will be chipped while some will be used for
fire wood at the park pavilions.
• The annual tree sale is scheduled to take place April 28th at the maintenance facility. The
Arbor Day event is scheduled to take place on May 5th at Lexington-Diffley Park. City
Forester, Gregg Hove has visited the City elementary schools to introduce the poster
contest.
-3 -
Date: March 14, 2001
Agenda Item: F. GRANT HEARING
Action x
4 City of Eagan Information
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments x 1. Site Plan
AGENDA ITEM: F, CENTRAL PARK GRANT HEARINts
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PAUL OLSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
ITEM OVERVIEW: The City Council has authorized staff to submit a Department of Natural
Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Application to request funding for the development of several
trail segments included in the Central Park master plan. The Park Commission has been designated to
conduct the public hearing required as part of the application.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
In the spring of 2000, the citizens of the Eagan passed a levy referendum to fund the
development of a community center and central park. The City Council subsequently approved
the creation of citizen focus groups to provide input to the design consultants. One of the results
of the process was the development of an overall master plan for the site. The master plan was
recently adopted by the City Council.
The master plan is intended to serve as a guide for both immediate and long term improvements
to the site. Funding from the levy referendum is sufficient to fund the first phase of the master
plan. Alternative funding, such as grants, will be sought to fund additional improvements.
ANALYSIS:
The trail segments included in the grant request will provide linkage to amenities located
throughout the site. The alignments will be appropriate for handicapped accessibility.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
According to the grant application the following information "should be communicated" at a
public hearing;
A) Project scope and related activities-
The request is for funding to develop :700'x10'of concrete trail
1000'x10'of bituminous trail
3 O' x 10' pedestrian bridge
Directional signage and trail benches
B) Implementation schedule-
Projected time frame : 5/01 to 7/01, Plans, specifications, bids, contracts
7/01 to 11/01, Rough grade and utility installation
3/02 to 11/02, Construction, installation, substantial completion
C) Cost and financing-
Estimated cost of the improvements included in the grant request; $84,800
_14.
Projected financing; Grant =(%50) $42,400
City match =(%50) $42,40
D) Cost to the community-
The community has approved a levy referendum for the project. Funding for the City share of
the grant project will come from referendum funds. The grant project will have no additional
impact on tax-payers.
E) Associated costs
Staff estimates the average annual cost/value of labor (in-kind) and materials to maintain the
grant elements over 20 years to be $8,630. The costs will be included in subsequent
maintenance and capital improvement budgets.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
To affirm the Council directive to submit a Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation
grant application to fund improvements consistent with the approved Central Park master plan
and to confirm that a public hearing was conducted.
- 5-
i" 3+ v0.< y W c
U L 0.4
IM 1. - U 1-111 A I1i1H
Item: FZ*is
•p'I qor 2OPd i Attachment #
° p
p®
I a ~c p p
Q p
J y
°1°
°
p °
F m J y
F' C
tAy `J k.~ /
"A g Ev
y o 3
0 0 .o f. p
p
06
61. (9 O Y g
F a
F F ~ '
2 1
A
qC O o
s m
L.9 ,0 O / u
N0090
00 o O
(n 1
Date: March 14, 2001
Agenda Item: GI
Action
City of Eagan Information
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments x 1. Existing Conditions
2. Preliminary Subdivision
3. Grading Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. Utility Plan
AGENDA ITEM: G-1; BLUE RIDGE 4TH ADDITION
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
I ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and
wetlands issues that pertain to the Blue Ridge 4th Addition development proposal.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
CSM Properties is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment and
Preliminary Subdivision (Blue Ridge Fourth Addition) to allow the construction of a
54,000 square foot office/warehouse upon a proposed 5.0 acre lot located south of Waters
Road and west of Lone Oak Drive (within the southwest 1/4 of Section 1).
In August of 2000, the City Council approved a Final Planned Development for Lot 2, Block
2, Blue Ridge Second Addition that called for the construction of a 77,000 square foot
office/warehouse building upon the eastern one half of a 20.7 acre site. The applicants are
proposing to amend the Blue Ridge Second Planned Development to allow the subdivision of
the 20.7 acre site into 15.7 and 5.0 acre parcels and the construction of a 54,000 square foot
office/warehouse on the newly created western parcel (Lot 2).
The proposed office/warehouse is centrally located on the site and is provided access via two
points from Waters Drive.
The site was previously graded and excepting some boulevard trees, holds no significant
vegetation.
This item is scheduled for consideration at the forthcoming 27 March APC Meeting.
PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION:
This development would be responsible for a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication.
TREE PRESERVATION:
A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are nine (9) significant trees
on site. Species break down is as follows:
Species Avg Diameter Dia. Range Count Percent of Total
Spruce 6" 6" 6 67%
Pine 7" 7" 2 22%
Poplar 12" NA 1 11%
_ lr .
There are other smaller, scattered deciduous trees, of non-significant size, located in the west
portion of this site. These trees do not occur at a density that would require them to be
inventoried as a significant woodland.
The development as proposed will result in the removal of one (1) significant tree, the poplar,
(I 1% of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable
tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, single-lot, commercial) is
set at 30.0% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal less than the allowable
amount, there is no required tree mitigation for this proposal.
In an effort to reduce tree removal numbers, the applicant has indicated that they will
transplant two of the existing spruce trees, currently located in the north portion of this site,
just south of Waters Drive, out of construction areas to a "green area" in the west side of this
site.
WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS:
This 5.0-acre subdivision is proposed to be located in the City's F-watershed. All stormwater
runoff from the development eventually will enter City Pond FP- 1, a Class V (Nutrient Trap)
waterbody in the northeast corner of Eagan. To meet City water quality requirements, the
developer proposes to direct runoff from the site to a constructed treatment pond that will
drain to City Pond FP-7, which is a natural wetland just south of the site.
Runoff from the area being developed just east of the subject site also is proposed to be
directed to the constructed treatment pond. This site was not subject to water quality
requirements previously because it was approved through the building permit process, not the
subdivision process. Within the subdivision request for Blue Ridge IV, however, the City
now can require ponding sufficient to treat runoff from both sites.
The required volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the impervious
proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking lots,
driveways, and walks). With a combined impervious proportion of 32 percent, a minimum
wet-pond volume of 1.00 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.34 acres would be needed
to treat the stormwater generated by a combined 12.1 acres of development. The pond would
need a minimum depth of six feet and a 10:1 aquatic bench beginning at the normal water
level. The outlet structure of the pond would need to be consistent with City of Eagan
standards.
The nearby natural wetland was last delineated and typed in July 1992. Wetland conservation
procedures consider wetland delineation reports to be valid for about 5 years. Therefore, an
amended wetland delineation report would need to be filed as soon as appropriate this spring,
and the development would be subject to its findings. Presently, it appears there are no
proposed direct impacts to the wetland, according to the 1992 wetland boundary shown.
To minimize nearby impacts, the development would need to be set back at least 30 feet from
the edge of the delineated boundary of the wetland. During and after development, a
_7_
minimum 30-foot wide buffer of natural undisturbed vegetation along the wetland would
need to be maintained.
EROSION
Erosion control practices should be properly installed and effectively maintained throughout
the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and negative impacts to down-
gradient resources and water quality.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. Recommend approval of the development proposal subject to conditions including
• Require that any park dedication be met in the form of a cash payment.
• Require that any trail dedication be met in the form of a cash payment.
This development should meet the City's water quality requirements entirely through on-
site ponding.
• A stormwater pond should be constructed with a minimum wet-pond volume of 1.00
acre-feet and a minimum area of 0.34 acres. The stormwater treatment pond should
be constructed according to NURP standards with a minimum depth of 6 feet, a 10:1
aquatic bench, and an outlet skimmer according to City design standards.
• To minimize nearby impacts, the development should be set back at least 30 feet from
the edge of the delineated boundary of the wetland. During and after construction of
the development, a minimum 30-foot wide buffer of natural undisturbed vegetation
along the delineated boundary of the wetland should be maintained.
• Erosion control practices should be properly installed and effectively maintained
throughout the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and negative
impacts to down-gradient resources and water quality.
2. Recommend approval with additional conditions.
3. Recommend denial.
Item: (1 -1 BQ;)~-14
} Attachment # 1. ~x ?A-~ A5 iiPy>
Y' u
E``•tiri: ~c :xi{;i!~~~~-a`% ~~Ii~rr;111t{\r i~ 'I ji
'~"Y 1 J I \
--'--J~I ~l ~l/ r v y~, (\si n tt / It 1• ` E
W i 7Sd_ -
. 71
lit[
q I / i •i t 1~ > w 1! 1, i III I
r ~ lid ~ ,'ti l { ~ ri ,~/%"~It~' ' I<~Sr 1
f
EXISTING CONDITIONS
fill,
FOP F.ky... f_.1N K
BLUE RIDGE FOURTH ADDITION ML
wr ti w-r,...
LOT 1 DoT
BLOCK 1
.,a RURP.
CF ~m~
T.7f..-E C ;jai ~ \ - ~
RPP
' T.S. - ~j~i - . _ i _~,.~y°~~.' I ~ r
neoTE +/Y
tow
Q;Q a
to.
i , ~i.:'::LTn~.uur _.r I r. •b.... - ^E Il ,aa ~.xTT.•
W~p
I L• ,«itin a[wn i1°n~P~'~-~ \ '/r/ y/ ••:r~ •,~~`,\I~i'L~,~~
k. J3*ljt
aRor
« EIeS,IN - 3EAIEMT~ / / , n J4y~~7~~ -
I, Q tEpo 1 boy j
( I i . , w : i c ' n a w " 1 ° ` ...,1 a ti ? I l l r
XiL
- r,
9- Am
JIT M.
oaul,
40D >
t ~ i ~ I ! I ~ /r' . --e•~ =._pt..:t.~r;,
I I
.11 PONdNC 4 UTILITY EASE«ENT \~I If I .?~P
Zf,„f`.. •...•p
PEP eOC. 773196 (PAR, TI
f
.tea FA
1 ' h \ I I ,j~ w..- > ~"^±rati '~z.,~, r
~I _n... 1 G e
~9m+.~o -NUF.i,s- i i \ C/
~AS
49 7.
_
I L 1
CIO
col Jj
If J
1 ;
no water, - law -0.5
0 ?dwW Urvkw,.«. Blll___ ter flat
.,.arr.. er
Item: (T -1 S3~ve.R; 4 ,~y .
s ! ~C s 1 Attachment # 3 . (MM). o,y'(c.
5 !s y a
• 16
r ~ r -l ti 1 I eta'
H
r-o 1;T
K ~1't` i ! 1 1 ! ~i' i
to
1 .a .¦1¦ ~ L ~ 1 ~ ~ t ~
1
9 t ss f. S
ills
QQQQQ QQ Q QrQQ li; ~ d > ~ ill;
m d !I' ~3~1~. :i `t.~ ::'Z:1' it r`ij' ir1~i,~il•i It \..T
% -r!ilrk ~ It~ll Ttii 1 ~ ,~11 `fit\'~-~'~-•~ ~r
i5k
-'fit.; _ ~t j; , ` '^~re~
r, It ~
~ j c 3 ~4+ 'C+.• `e' I ~ .t , I:~ 1) ~ ~ 1~ t ~ZO l 1~^L
r Fe I l )
f \ ~ , ' I ~ 4 IIa ~ r i 1r$r~ Q ~~t
j' p. 1,! Q r d { cat! ~rr
GRADING PLAN
Item:
Attachment # y. L~ap~ ~la~•
f ~!,.~~«5~3333 ! f2 ~ Z f 3
fij
¦ ;
fill
t! (u~}tj3~ , ~ }i t~;, Z If~ =ra3=. + s IIIUM'IMIII !
t ~lli:r:f~ 1 t t~ ' f~t 1 ~~f
, c
.t,¦1/eS~r~„ i~f ;it uq! 1 , if :F =i ! U ' ) j ij't +
,.¦ra..tasFrFF! tit t'on¦ s ! ~t {S! t~ > tl t ii
.i7 Y - l fl
l j \ .s ^ m", ~ m~ti' l,f'li~l j ilia
49
171
Jam. ~ R1 `i
1 11
\ f 1
1! 1 11 111 11 1
l I~I)
l i 1 i ! i L c s
nil
i r*
;1? 'I I
- as I
} ~IIII
s
l i p
i Ip i, ?;1 .
"go j - i
X==1 w
- ~o . - LANDSCAPE PLAN
Item: 6.-I, Blve
Attachment # U l~Ia~ I3
fit1' t f r~ I I i t
s I E..1t~ b I I I
I Ii~~i g ~ 4 s
~ 1• ;
i
r1 lNA I~ ~ rll all
i l d I 3
Jr(/ O
gig
91 1
IV,
t 1 i \ IIII
-
~J r- 0 r I I ~u
• _ UTILITY PLAN
Date: March 14,2001
Agenda Item: H-1
Action x
City of Eagan Information
. ` Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X 1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Preliminary Subdivision
4. Permit Narrative
AGENDA ITEM: 111, THOMAS WOODS
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ITEM OVERVIEW : The Park Commission has previously reviewed this development proposal. The
proposal is being returned to the Commission for the of review water resource and trail issues that were not
addressed at the time of the nriQinal suhmitsicin
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Manley Land Company is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval to allow the
creation of a 30 lot single family residential subdivision entitled "Thomas Woods". The
proposed subdivision overlays 13.0 acres of land located south of Cliff Road and west of
Dodd Road in the northwest 1/4 of Section 36.
In conjunction with the requested preliminary subdivision, the applicant has also requested a
Rezoning of the property from an A, Agriculture to an R-1, Residential Single Family zoning
designation.
The property in question is bordered on the north and south by unsewered single family
homes (large lot); on the east by sewered single family homes; and on the west by the
Lebanon Hills Regional Park.
The site has a topographic difference of approximately 20 feet from the northwest to the
southeast. Mature vegetation exists along the site's north, south, and east property lines. A
wetland exists in the extreme southeast corner of the site. The property is currently occupied
by three single family residences.
The subdivision is accessed from the east via two points on Dodd Road.
This item was considered by the APC on December 20, 2001 and is scheduled to be
considered by the City Council on 20 March.
PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION:
The development includes a dedicated trail easement connection to Lebanon Hills Regional Park.
County staff has made accommodation for a trail connection at this location in the new Lebanon
Hills master plan. The Developer has asked the City to provide direction regarding the
installation of a trail through the easement.
-9-
Throughout the City there are a number of similar easements allowing access into City and
County park land. Staff has found eight foot bituminous trail connections to be the most
appropriate for a number of reasons:
• The trail easement is defined and readily identifiable-This is especially important in
residential areas where the easement passes between homes, and over time. may be
"adopted" into the adjoining yards by the home owners. New home buyers will see the trail
before they close on a home.
• It is more efficient to have the trail installed during development---At some later date it
would become the responsibility of the City to coordinate a paving project. (An eight foot
wide trail would be adequate for the level of use and is less likely to be confused as a
driveway.)
TREE PRESERVATION:
There are no tree preservation issues at this time
WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS:
Water Quality Issues
This 13-acre development would be located in the City's L-watershed, which is in the southeast
corner of Eagan and which is associated with Fitz Lake. Approximately four acres of the parcel is
within the shoreland overlay district of Fitz Lake, which is a state-protected waterbody and which
is classified as Class II-Indirect Contact Recreation by the City's water quality management
plan. The proposed development needs to meet the City's water quality requirement to treat
stormwater runoff from the site. The developer proposes to do so by directing stormwater from
10.6 acres to four constructed treatment basins on the site. Stormwater from 1.11 acres of the
development is proposed to drain offsite. This area would be subject to a cash dedication in lieu
of ponding. The remaining 1.25 acres of the development would be wetland.
Minimum requirements for volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on
the impervious proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking
lots, driveways, and walks). With an impervious fraction of 24 percent, a minimum wet-pond
volume of 0.80 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.33 acres would be needed to treat the
stormwater generated by this development.
The developer proposes to create four ponds to treat stormwater from three sub-drainage
areas within the development. Pond 1 (.43 acre-feet) would be connected to Pond 2 (.06 acre-
feet), and both would receive stormwater from 5.54 acres of the site. Pond 3 (0.10 acre-feet)
would receive stormwater from 2.07 acres of the site. Pond 4 (.56 acre-feet) would receive
stormwater from 2.98 acres of the site. This pond would also have the capacity to treat runoff
from a potential section of an upgraded Dodd Road, should that occur in the future.
There are two natural wetlands on this parcel. Under the classification system of the Fish and
Wildlife Service, one 0.8-acre wetland is classified as Type 3; the other 0.1-acre wetland is
classified as Type 4. Type 3 wetlands are inland shallow fresh marshes that are permanently
inundated with six or more inches of water during the growing season. Vegetation includes
grasses, bulrushes, and various other marsh plants such as cattails, arrowheads, and
smartweeds. Type 4 wetlands are inland deep fresh marshes in which the soils are usually
covered with six inches to three feet or more of water during the growing season. Vegetation
-10-
includes cattails, reeds, and bulrushes. In open areas, pondweeds, coontail, and water lilies
may occur.
Both wetlands are under the jurisdiction of the Wetland Conservation Act of Minnesota
(WCA)-administered locally by the City-and Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act-
administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any proposals to drain, fill, or excavate
these wetlands need to meet the provisions of these laws.
The developer proposes to impact both wetlands by filling. Wetland A would receive 1,589
square feet of fill, and Wetland B would receive 4,252 square feet of fill, or would be entirely
filled. Under WCA provisions, this development is allowed a maximum wetland impact of 400
square feet. Any proposal having wetland impacts beyond what is allowable must document
attempts made to avoid, minimize, etc. those impacts and must include, for City consideration, a
proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan. Wetland mitigation (replacement, in this
case) is based on a 2:1 ratio: Twice the amount of impacted acres needs to be replaced. Mitigated
wetland acres needs to be annually monitored for up to five years to ensure that the wetland
replacement is functional and stable.
According to the wetland replacement plan received on March 13, 2001, the developer proposes
to mitigate for 5,841 square feet of wetland fill by replacing 11,682 square feet of wetland (2 X
5,841). Wetland replacement is proposed as a combination of New Wetland Credit (NWC) and
Public Value Credit (PVC). as provided by WCA. According to WCA rules, NWC must be at
least 5,841 square feet, in this case. The developer proposes to create 6,016 square feet of new
wetland along the eastern edge of Wetland A. PVC is applied to impacted area with a .75 factor,
and can be applied to created stormwater treatment pond area. This means the developer must
construct at least 7,555 square feet of stormwater treatment pond area to be applied as wetland
PVC replacement. A total of 22,492 square feet of stormwater ponding area is proposed.
The developer proposes to monitor the success of the proposed wetland replacement area for up
to five years by filing annual monitoring reports with the City.
Shoreland Zoning Issues
The City of Eagan Shoreland Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 11.21 City Code) applies to development
of this parcel because it is located within 1,000 feet of the ordinary high water level of state-
protected Fitz Lake. Accordingly, average lot areas shall be no less than 15,000 square feet, lot
widths shall be no less than 75 feet, structure heights shall be no greater than 35 feet, and total
imperviousness shall be no greater than 25 percent. As proposed, this meets all provisions of the
shoreland overlay district.
Erosion Control
In several areas of this development, the topography of the site requires proper installation
and effective maintenance of erosion control practices to prevent and minimize soil loss from
the site and impacts to down-gradient resources and water quality.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. Recommend approval of the revisions to the development proposal subject conditions
including:
• The developer install an eight foot wide bituminous trail through the dedicated trail
easement, terminating at the boundary of Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Said trail to be
built in accordance with City standards and specifications.
• The development should meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by
creating a minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 0.80 acre-feet covering a
minimum area of 0.33 acres. Stormwater treatment ponds should be constructed
according to NURP standards with a maximum depth of 6 feet, a 10:1 aquatic bench
from the normal water level, and an outlet skimmer according to City design
standards.
• A cash dedication of $1,961 should be required in lieu of ponding for untreated
stormwater that will runoff of 1.11 acres of the site.
• The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan should be approved, allowing
the developer to fill 5,841 square feet of wetland and create 6,012 square feet of
NWA and 7,555 square feet PVC wetland.
• With the exception of the area adjacent to the constructed stormwater treatment pond, the
area along the proposed roadway, and the area designated as NWA, a minimum 30-foot
wide buffer of natural, undisturbed vegetation outside the boundary of the wetland should
be maintained before, during, and after construction.
• Erosion control practices should be properly installed and effectively maintained
throughout the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and negative
impacts to down-gradient resources and water quality.
2. Recommend approval with additional or alternate conditions.
3. Recommend denial.
Item: Wk TkoritaS U)ooa.
Location Map Attachment # i LOCACA MAP
¦ •pw ~~i p
r. a • 1 s
ti • r~~ a C•
•
d ¦ • t ¦f g +
I 41b ss
aI. . • I
- • • tI
{t t"
E / •
i
• •t t
S 6' s
Sub ect Site
6t' ~t
LEE
t Es t
•
d
9000 0 1000 2000 Feet
Development/Developer. Thomas Woods
Application: Preliminary Subdivision and Rezoning
Case No.: 36-PS-12-07-00 and 36-RZ-09-07-00
pTO•id.d N
by ==L Proy¦.dU.W ~ arln.w at. Pared b¦n m I Norwr6rmOD.
endba+r¦ts
*City of Eagan / THIS MAP a INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w+E
MINNESOTA Tbe City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are 5
C..re.ay b...wp...l b.oarnw.M not responsible for errors or omissions.
1SJ W tC2C60 IO/CI/CO 6-P?60C lI Item:
b 1 \
Attach
ment # 2 51 T6 PUS
W 5 s
b y o E
4:21
\ 1 i 2255 i g
1 i il~ a° a° a° R2!t T , ~Ar- p M' ! p
4 <
tj• ~f ' t g
LLJ
+i7I ~ , ~1,~ ' - o I° R III z
11 a ~ t4
u1 ^ ~b I i it
~ LY• ` tF
z
is
\ \ i I f a
IN
gig ~fj
\ ° } I pf
its
I ~ j Its
ill I V / -i i I I' *
a.
(v VI•) S IWL 33YAM
Kl:TM 4 (71~ S6') !S 9K2~Y3W DrlWK •
ON6d d 1/-r' 40' • f
6"9Z6'l!M i i
L OW°d ws?
Item: N-l „nas lc)ooh s
Attachment #3
J ?S i ovt
121,11 1 lit
r j TTRT~ 7
'I'IIIIIIi'IIH
<N>{ r _ s -
<o~< Ham'' egg ~3t;i i' ~ q ; j1 Tr#: l ;
m 8 V ~N~ Y:jj sTTs`~ TT II
yW170W St oyW~1o T~„ij yo sf• ==E{j~j j~ i TFijTp
32w~2 Wd g
< l71r¢~ tai=[ 7 p~>{T~a+iS>iifi s~Ii TFSjsi
III Fg~- 01 -J,
I X
lit
F.- 77 Nil
LL r
FI- 9 2* C4
4:~ C4
? L--.
elm,
Ica 'I
Nw.
3. PRELIMINARYSUBDIVISION
Item: N-ti S 5
Attachmeri Pen,-,+ f , , ve-
I
PERMIT NARRATIVE
t WCA REPLACEMENT PLAN AND
SECTION 404 PERMIT
THOMAS WOODS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
i Applicant: Manley Brothers Construction
March 13, 2001
PEC Project No. 2000-015
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of a 13 acre site along Dodd Road in Eagan, Minnesota (Figure
{ 1). The site is located in the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 Section 36, Township 27
` North, Range 23 West. Manley Brothers Construction is proposing to construct the
Thomas Woods development. The development will consist of 30 single-family housing
' units. Plans for the proposed development are contained in the pocket of this permit
application package.
WETLAND DELINEATION AND CLASSIFICATION
Two jurisdictional wetlands, totaling 0.90 acres, lie on the project site (Figure 2). Both
wetlands were delineated by Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. in 2000 in
association with the proposed Thomas Woods development.
Wetlands on the project site were field delineated according to the methodology set forth
in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987). Wetlands
were delineated using the "Routine Determination Method" in accordance with
methodology set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
i (Tech. Report Y-87-1). The identified wetlands were classified according to the
methodologies set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States
(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States
(USFWS Circular 39; Shaw and Fredine 1971). Throughout this narrative, "Cowardin"
wetland types are given first with Cowardin abbreviations and "Circular 39" types given
in parentheses. Wetlands within the project site are described briefly below:
Permit Narrative - Thomas Woods Development
March 13, 2001
PEC Project No. 2000-015
Page 2
Wetland A
Wetland A is a 0.81 acre seasonally flooded, palustrine emergent wetland (PEMC;
Circular 39 Type 3 shallow marsh) surrounded by a wide fringe of temporarily flooded
palustrine emergent wetland (PEMA; Circular 39 Type 1 seasonally flooded flat). The
predominant vegetation consists of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW+),
American water plantain (Alisma subcordatum; OBL), swamp milkweed (Asclepias
incarnata; OBL), and broad leaf cattail (T)pha latifolia; OBL) This basin is underlain by
an unidentified hydric soil inclusion in the County soil survey (Figure 3). Wetland A
appears on the City of Eagan's wetland inventory as A36-06/4.
Wetland B
M Wetland B is a 0.09 acre excavated, seasonally flooded, palustrine emergent wetland
(PEMCx; Circular 39 Type 3 shallow marsh) surrounded by a narrow, temporarily
I flooded palustrine emergent wetland (PEMA; Circular 39 Type 1 seasonally flooded
flat). The dominant vegetation consists of common duckweed (Lemna minor; OBL) and
reed canary grass. This basin is also underlain by an unidentified hydric soil inclusion in
the County soil survey (Figure 3).: Wetland B appears on the City of Eagan's wetland
inventory as A36-06/4.
WETLAND IMPACTS
The proposed project would entail the filling of 5,841 square feet of wetland (0.13 acre).
Wetland A, which totals 35,085 square feet, would receive 1,589 square feet of fill for
the construction of the street serving the plat and construction of one of the stormwater
ponds on the site. Wetland B would be completely filled to provide stormwater ponding
for the front third of the development.. The proposed wetland impacts represent 14
percent of the 0.90 total wetland acres on the project site.
SEQUENCING ANALYSIS
Because the proposed impacts are less than 10,000 square feet, the Local Government
f Unit (LGU) under the WCA is free to conduct on-site sequencing without written
sequencing documentation from the applicant (see Minn. Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2).
However, to facilitate the permitting process, the following narrative has been prepared
to document their efforts to avoid and minimize wetland impacts on the site.
1
I
Permit Narrative - Thomas Woods Development
March 13, 2001
PEC Project No. 2000-015
Page 3
Impact Avoidance
As required by the WCA rules, the applicant has considered alternatives that would avoid
wetland impacts altogether. These alternatives are:
No Action Alternative
One alternative is the no action alternative, which would result in the entire project site
remaining undeveloped. The applicant considers this alternative infeasible because it is;
(1) inconsistent with the City's comprehensive plan guidance for the area (i.e. D-1,
single-family residential) and (2) would defeat the reasonable, investment-backed
expectations of the applicant.
Variation on Proposed Site Plan
A second avoidance alternative would be a variation on the site plan currently being
` proposed. Such a variation would require the elimination of four lots. The loss of four
lots represents a 14 percent reduction in the size of the development. The applicant
submits that the adverse economic impact that would be caused by the loss of four lots is
not warranted given the very small amount and poor quality of the wetland acreage
affected. The degraded quality of the affected areas is discussed below.
Impact Minimization
Wetland impacts on the, proposed project have. been minimized to the extent practicable.
The proposed project has gone through a number of iterations, each of which has resulted
in a-reduction in the amount of wetland impact. During the design process, the applicant
has been able two add two additional parcels to his land assemblage, providing him more
design flexibility to further minimize wetland impacts. As shown on the project plans,
0.90 acres of the project site consists of jurisdictional wetlands. The applicant has
avoided all but 5841 square feet (0.13 acre) of this wetland acreage.
The proposed fill impacts to Wetland A are required to 1) provide a safe design for the
roadway through the plat and 2) allow construction of the stormwater pond in the
southwest corner of the site. Adjustment of the road alignment to avoid this impact
would result in poor roadway geometrics and create a possible health and safety concern
r for future residents (e.g., both creating a reverse curve and also impeding the movement
1 of fire and safety vehicles through the development). Fill required for this impact will be
placed in an area of low-quality Type I fringe dominated by reed canary grass and other
nuisance plant species. Mitigation of this fill impact will allow for the replacement of
the affected low quality Type 1 wetland with higher quality Type 3 wetland. Creation of
the stormwater pond is required to accommodate runoff from the surrounding impervious
Permit Narrative - Thomas Woods Development
March 13, 2001
i PEC Project No. 2000-015
Page 4
surface created by the development. y The applicant has explored the reconfiguration of
this pond to avoid the impact but has found that insufficient space exists to do this and
still meet NURP criteria. As with the roadway impact, fill for the stormwater pond will
be placed in an area of low-quality Type 1 fringe. Mitigation of this impact will allow
the replacement of low-quality Type 1 wetland with higher quality Type 3 wetland.
The proposed impact to Wetland B is needed to provide adequate stormwater ponding for
the front third of the development. The City's stormwater management plan and water
quality guidelines require construction of a stormwater pond to accommodate runoff
from this area. The most logical place to locate the pond is in the southeast comer of the
development. This results in moving Lots 1 through 3, of Block 2 back to the west,
necessitating the filling of Wetland B. Although the impact to wetland B could be
avoided (resulting' in the loss of two building lots or seven percent of the development),
new wetland constructed to mitigate this impact will result in the replacement of low-
quality wetland with higher quality, more ecologically diverse wetland. Wetland B is an
excavated stock pond dominated by duckweed (Figure 4).
The applicant submits that the proposed project represents the environmentally preferable
alternative due to the small quantity and poor quality of the wetland acreage affected
versus the quantity and quality of the wetland replacement being provided.
Compensatory Mitigation
Wetland Conservation Act
The proposed project entails 5,841 square feet (0.13 acre) of wetland fill regulable under
the WCA. The wetland acreage requiring replacement is 5,841 square feet; at a 2 to 1
ratio, this equates to 11,682 square feet (0.27 acre). Wetland replacement will be
provided through a combination of New Wetland Credit (NWC) and Public Value Credit
(PVC)-
New Wetland Credit:
The applicant proposes to create 5,841 square feet new wetland credit (NWC) to be
constructed adjacent to Wetland A (see Preliminary Grading Plan, Appendix C) All of
the NWC will be applied to the Thomas Woods project.
The proposed NWC replacement wetland will be constructed. by excavating to an
elevation of 927.5 feet (to be at or below the bottom elevation of the Type 3 portion of
existing Wetland A). This will provide a hydrological connection between the mitigation
wetland and the existing wetland. Soils in the area of the proposed mitigation are
somewhat poorly drained inclusions not recognized in the soil survey. They should
provide adequate ponding for creation of the mitigation wetland. To minimize re-
Permit Narrative - Thomas Woods Development
March 13, 2001
PEC Project No. 2000-015
Page 5
invasion by reed canary grass that may be in the seed bank, Y arY present no backfilling of soils
from impacted wetlands is proposed. Backfill will be accomplished using soil from
upland areas located away from existing infestations of exotic wetland species such as
reed canary grass. Slopes within the replacement wetland will average 5 to 1, with both
the bottom contours and margins to be irregular. Slopes have been varied to promote a
natural appearance. These measures are consistent with the design standards set forth in
the WCA rules (see Minn. Rules 8420.0550). The scarified area around the fringe of the
replacement wetland will be re-seeded with a native grass mixture (Appendix B). Areas
below the normal water level will be allowed to re-vegetate naturally.
Public Value Credit:
The remainder of the required wetland replacement would be in the form of public value
credit (PVC) from the stormwater ponds being created as part of the project. Minn.
Rules 8420.0540 Subpart 2 (E)(3) provides PVC credit for 75 percent of the surface area
of water quality treatment ponds that pre-treat stormwater prior to discharge to other
wetlands, in City's having approved stormwater management plans. The ponding areas
proposed as part of the project total 22,492 square feet in area. Public Value Credit
generated from the primary stormwater ponds equals 16,869 square feet (0.39 acres).
This represents sufficient PVC credit to provide the second half of the 2 to 1 replacement
ratio required for the project. The stormwater ponding being provided on the Thomas
Woods project meets the design parameters set forth in Minn. Rules 8420.9=0540 Subp.
2(F).
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
For purposes of the. Corps of Engineers regulatory . program, the- total impact from
wetland filling will be 5,841 square feet (0.13 acre). Because this fill is more. than 2000
square feet and involves isolated wetlands, it is covered by the existing Letter of
Permission-B. An impact of this magnitude requires replacement under the Corps rules.
The 1:1 replacement generally required under Corps rules will be met by the first half of
the mitigation required by the WCA replacement plan outlined above.
Monitoring Plan
The applicant will monitor the success of the proposed wetland replacement area for a
period of up to five (5) years as required by the WCA. The standard BWSR monitoring
report form will be used to report results. All of the required content elements set forth
in Minn. Rules 8420.0620 Subp. 2 will be supplied in the monitoring report. The
locations of fixed photo reference points have been established to provide photographic
documentation of wetland replacement results (see grading plan, Appendix Q. A PEC
Permit Narrative - Thomas Woods Development
March 13, 2001
PEC Project No. 2000-015
Page 6
wetland scientist will be on-site during the construction of the mitigation wetland.
Depending upon field conditions and observations of PEC during construction, minor
modifications to the mitigation plan described here may be necessary in order to achieve
the stated design goals.
As required by the WCA, the replacement wetland will be monitored annually for five
years following completion of construction or until the Technical Evaluation Panel is
satisfied that the replacement wetland is fully functional. The specific parameters to be
evaluated are set forth in the WCA rules and include; 1) the wetland types desired and
those achieved, 2) adherence to replacement plans and reasons for any deviations (first
annual report only), 3) annual hydrologic measurements, 4) dominant vegetation, and 5)
color photographs from each established photo-documentation point as shown on the
plan in Appendix C. Annual monitoring reports will be submitted to the City of Eagan
for review.
P:\PROJECTS\2000\2000-015\Permits\2000015Wcanarative2.doc
M WY 6C C60 10/CT/CO 0w2Y0SLa It
s 1
RBI
O y~
o` N
See. w See
\ 1 i i o ac a r a a p
all i i[t ti
L ~ ~I~e i ~ e a I I ! ; I Y I ~
'Jr
%
x <
Z
. I 'rs~ } 1 e
1`~' '•ii J" W ! s
LLV
ve r ?
ell
! Yi I i o Y I fit
i 1 f !r / - f i I
6
(7Y R•) t 12WL-Y7a? rnnax
? cav w) A a.z,.ZW DYJ~s -2
1 01ar 1 h?/ s1 ff. -INN $ N •
I GNU sCi •
0 s~F*w
Date: 3/19/01
Agenda Item: 1-1, SKATEBOARD PARK
UPDATE
'1 Action
t ~City of Eagan Information X
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments
AGENDA ITEM: I-i; SKATEBOARD PARK UPDATE
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: BETH A. WIELDE, ADMINSITRATIVE SPECIALIST
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Update on Phase II of the Skateboard Park investigation.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
In December of 2000, staff presented an overview of skateboard parks, with an emphasis on
Tier I classification (ramps under 3' high). The APrC recommended staff conduct further
research into the feasibility of bringing a Tier I park to Eagan. The investigation was to focus on
determining public support, cost analysis, and not acquiring any new land for the park.
PROGRESS:
• Three sites have been investigated for potential locations. At this time, these include
Goat Hill, Bridle Ridge, and Quarry Park. These sites were chosen because of the
existing rinks and supplemental amenities such as lighting and restroom facilities.
Thorough analysis of these sites and others will be presented in the Phase II report
• Costs of ramps and other features vary greatly between manufacturers. Design
enhancements and materials such as steel can drive up the price of certain ramps. A
comparative study is being prepared by staff to demonstrate the range of features, and
variables that make prices fluctuate.
• Staff decided to proceed with determining public support until after the APrC decides
if the project should continue. This decision was made based upon the amount of
staff time required for a proper determination.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
¦ This item is for informational purposes only.
Date: March 12.2001
Agenda Item: J 1; CIP 2002-2006
Action x
City of Eagan Information
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments N.
1. CIP Summary
AGENDA ITEM: J-1; CIP 2002-2006
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PAUL OLSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
I ITEM OVERVIEW: Review and approve the 2002-2006 CIP for the Park Site Acquisition and
Development Fund.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
The Park Commission met in a workshop session on February 21St to review the current 5 year
(2001-2005) CIP and to add 2006 as the "new" 5th year.
At the workshop, the members present reviewed park dedication and interest revenues and
agreed that the projected 2002 fund balance of $2.46 million was realistic and could be used as
the basis for developing the revised CIP. The members also identified several new projects for
inclusion in the CIP including Central Park, Holz Farm and the Cedar Grove (Cedarvale) area
improvements. Several other projects that had been identified in the 2001-2005 CIP were moved
into different years to better correspond with related issues.
ANALYSIS:
To remain consistent with City Council directives, all of the available funds, including revenues,
were allocated over the 5 years of the CIP. The three new projects added to the CIP are as follows;
• Holz Farm Development ($250,000 in 2003)-A master plan for the farm is scheduled to
developed in 2002. There have been multiple requests from the City inspection staff to develop
restrooms to accommodate special events and tour groups.
• Central Park ($300,000) in 2004)-The funding available from the recent referendum is not
intended to fund the implementation of the entire master plan for the site. The money would be
used to fund the additional site improvements and leverage grant dollars.
• Cedar Grove ($150,000) in 2006)-The former Cedarvale area of the City is proposed for a
major redevelopment/rehabilitation. Funding may be needed to assist with the implementation
of the park elements of a master plan.
The North Park infrastructure project ($250,000 in 2001) was moved to 2002 due to delays in the
approval process. The section of the CIP entitled "Other Allocations" was left intact other than
reducing the "Acquisition" portion by $50,000 to account for the possible acquisition of property
adjacent to Patrick Eagan Park that had previously been reviewed by the Commission. Adjustments
were also made for inflation.
WIA-
The CIP is intended to be a guide for planning purposes and is subject to review and adjustment or
change. The Park Commission will be asked to review the CIP each spring to reflect current
priorities and funding and to add a new 5'h
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
A detailed summary of the 2002-2006 CIP is attached for review.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1) Approve the 2002-2006 CIP as presented
2) Revise the proposed CIP and recommend approval.
Item: j t - L i.
PARK SITE FUND
2002 - 2006 C.I.P. Attachment # l g~.),%rviw-4R
Park Site Fund Balance as of 1/2001 = $2,220,000
(Includes Estimated 2001 Revenues)
2001
ACTIVE PROJECTS Estimated Cost
Grant Property Planning (from 2000) $15,000
North Park Mitigation (from 2000) $150,000
Blackhawk Security Lights $35,000
Northview Security Lights $40,000
Lexin on/Diffle Security Lights $40,000
Rahn Rink Light Upgrade $30,000
Playground Replacement (2) $50,000
TOTAL $360,000
-$360,000
Estimated Park Site Fund Balance as of 1/2002 = $1,860,000
Estimated Revenue 2002 - 2005 (4 x $150,000) = $600,000
(Interest and Fees)
Total Available 2002 - 2006 = $2,460,000
Estimated 2006 Revenue ($125,000) = $2,585,000
ANNUAL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
2002 = $665,000
2003 = $425,000
2004 = $485,000
2005 = $225,000
2006 = $180,000
Acquisition = $460,000
Small Projects = $100,000
Unallocated = $ 45,000
Total Expenditures = $2,585,000
1/2007 BALANCE = 0
ANNUAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2002
PROJECTS Estimated Cost
Soccer Field Lighting $175,000
Moonshine Park Development $140,000
Holz Farm Master Plan $20,000
Playground Replacement (3) $80,000
North Park Infrastructure $250,000
TOTAL $665,000
2003
PROJECTS Estimated Cost
Carnelian Rink Light Upgrade $30,000
Clearwater Rink Light Upgrade $30,000
Captain Dodd Sun Shelter $35,000
Ridgecliff Sun Shelter $35,000
Playground Replacement (2) $55,000
Holz Farm Development $250,000
TOTAL $425,000
2004
PROJECTS Estimated Cost
Northview Tennis Court Lights $75,000
Patrick Eagan Master Plan $50,000
Playground Replacement (2) $60,000
Central Park Improvements $300,000
TOTAL $485,000
2005
PROJECTS Estimated Cost
As halt Hockey Rink $35,000
Walnut Hill Trail $80,000
Carlson Lake Dock $25,000
Rahn South Master Plan $25,000
Playground Replacement (2) $60,000
TOTAL $225,000
2006
PROJECTS Estimated Cost
Cedar Grove Improvements $150,000
Playground Replacement (1) $30,000
TOTAL $180,000
1:/ml/park site fund - 2
-ti Date: February 19, 2000
Agenda Item: j-2; Fish Lake Water Quality
Project- Reclassification of City
Pond JP-47
City of Eagan
Parks and Recreation MEMO Action F
Information
Attachments
AGENDA ITEM: J-2; FISH LAKE WATER QUALITY PROJECT-
RECLASSIFICATION OF CITY POND JP-47
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
ITEM OVERVIEW: Recommend City Council to reclassify City Pond JP-47 from Class IV-Wildlife
Habitat to Class V-Nutrient Trap to provide more opportunity for effective operation and maintenance of the
alum-dosing facility for Fish Lake.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Fish Lake is one of only six of the City's Class I (highest quality) lakes with potential to support
direct contact recreation, such as swimming. A diagnostic/feasibility study of the lake was
conducted in September 1994 to analyze water quality impairments and to review a set of
remedial measures to improve water quality. One such measure was development of an alum-
dosing facility.
The City entered into agreements with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in June 1995 and
June 1996 to fund a Clean Water Partnership (CWP) Project for Fish Lake. The work plan of the
CWP included an alum-dosing facility, which was constructed between Hurley Lake and Fish
Lake in 1998. Briefly, the facility adds to stormwater aluminum sulfate, which reacts with the
phosphorus in the stormwater before it enters Fish Lake. Aluminum phosphate, a solid that
lightly settles in the water column, forms. Phosphorus unbound in this way is the primary culprit
that contributes to algal blooms in lakes.
The alum-dosing facility is an experimental project, permitted by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Last year,
the City experimentally increased its alum dosage eight-fold, based on the research of a
University of Minnesota doctoral student. This increased dosage, however, resulted in the -
accumulation of large quantities of aluminum phosphate in City Pond JP-47, the receiving
wetland between the facility and Fish Lake.
ANALYSIS:
City Pond JP-47 is classified Class IV (Wildlife Habitat) by the 1990 Eagan Water Quality
Management Plan. However, this classification is inconsistent with what the City is doing to the
wetland via aluminum phosphate accumulation. Furthermore, for the City to maintain its highest
priority classification of Fish Lake, a long-term strategy is needed regarding the effective
operation and maintenance of the alum-dosing facility and its primary receiving waterbody.
By downgrading JP-47 to Class V (Nutrient Trap), the City would be deciding to degrade a small
wetland on behalf of the prioritization of another waterbody much more valuable to the entire
It, -
community. This action will also allow the City the flexibility to increase the storage capacity of
JP-47, beyond the natural characteristics of the basin. As it is now, to be consistent with its
wildlife habitat classification, the City would only remove accumulated aluminum phosphate-
something it must do this spring regardless. While this would somewhat restore the natural
conditions of the wetland, it would leave the City having to revisit this restoration every several
years because aluminum phosphate would continue accumulate, as long as the dosing facility
were operating. If the City determined to significantly increase the capacity of the wetland, then
less frequent sediment removal would be needed.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
Under Wetland Conservation Act rules, the City's need to remove accumulated aluminum
phosphate from JP-47 can be addressed as a no-net loss-extracting that which naturally did not
exist through its local government unit role. Under the same rules, the City would need to
mitigate for wetland acres impacted by excavation beyond the natural features of the wetland.
To be consistent with its waterbody classification system, the City would be in a better
position to increase the storage and water quality treatment capacity of JP-47 by having it be
classified a non-recreational Class V (Nutrient Trap).
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Recommend City Council to reclassify City Pond JP-47 from Class IV-Wildlife Habitat to Class
V-Nutrient Trap to provide more opportunity for effective operation and maintenance of the
alum-dosing facility for Fish Lake.
Date: March.12, 2001
Agenda Item: L-2
Action
i City of Eagan Information x
1 Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments
AGENDA ITEM: L-2, PARK TELEPHONE SERVICE
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: PAUL OLSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
ITEM OVERVIEW: The cost of telephone service to park buildings is continuing to increase. Staff has
explored several options intended to reduce costs while retaining the same level of service. The option
staff has selected will be vresented to the Commission for informational purposes.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
To facilitate efficient communications, "staff' telephones were installed in the maintenance
rooms of six park buildings including Thomas Lake, Northview East and West, Lexington-
Diffley, Rahn and Ohmann Parks. The telephones are used by staff to contact supervisors, other
staff, the police or reservation groups. The telephones have proven to be especially useful for
park attendants who are paged by a group using a pavilion or by a supervisor. They are not
intended for public use and in most instances are used only seasonally.
ANALYSIS:
When the telephones were installed the service provider offered the opportunity to disconnect a
service at no fee. When the time came to reactivate the service a "reconnection fee" was paid. For
a minimal additional fee the telephone number could be retained for the next season. The
reconnection fee was less than the cost of putting the telephone on a vacation or standby rate.
Last year, when US West became Qwest, the option of disconnecting and reactivating service
was discontinued. A business customer now has the option of putting a service on a modified
vacation rate or continuing service at the regular monthly rate. Based upon current schedules, the
cost of the a full year of service is as follows;
Vacation Rate = $29 @ month x 5 months = $145
Regular Service = $59 @ month x 7 months = $413
Annual Cost = $558 x 6 telephones = $3348
In response to the cost increase staff has explored the option of utilizing cellular service for
the staff telephones. Because of the large number of seasonal staff members the use of hand
held cellular telephones seemed inappropriate and inefficient. Considerable time would be
spent coordinating the location and use of the telephones. Instead staff has opted to purchase
the larger "bag style" cellular telephones which can be securely mounted to the wall and
hardwired or plugged directly into a wall electrical'outlet.
The costs of cellular service;
One time telephone purchase = (bag telephone) = ($150) x 6 telephones = $900
Basic service (30 min.) = $ 6.95 @ month x 7 months = $48.65
Vacation fee = $ 3.00 @ month x 5 months = $15
(A) Annual Service Cost = $63.65 x 6 telephones = $293
Total First Year Cost (incl.purchase) =$1193
Upgraded service (225 min.) = Additional $18 @ month x 7 months x 6 telephones = $756
(B) Annual Service Cost with Upgraded Service = $1050
Total First Year Cost (incl.purchase) =$1950
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
Staff will implement the program utilizing the Basic Service package. The use at each site will be
monitored to determine the most appropriate rate schedule. Long distance, call return and fee
based calls will be blocked. Funding for the purchase of the cell telephones will come from the
savings to be realized in the communications portion of the operating budget.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
This item is presented for informational purposes. No Commission action is necessary at this
time.
SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY
& MOLENDA. P.A.
TO: Gregg Hove, City Forester
FROM: Sharon K. Hills, City Attorney
DATE: February 23, 2001
RE: Tree Preservation Regulations
Our File No. 206-04768
In accordance with your request, this memorandum addresses the definition of the terms
"practical difficulties" and "practical hardships" as used in the tree preservation regulations,
Section 11.10, Subd. 15.1(D)(2). This memorandum also addresses the authority of the City to
enact, as a part of the tree preservation regulations, specific preservation regulations for "heritage
trees."
1. Definition of "Practical Hardship".
Section 11.10, Subd. 15.1(D), of the City Code governs the allowable tree removal. Paragraph D,
clause 2, provides an exception which would permit a deviation from the maximum allowable
tree removal. Specifically, Paragraph D(2) states that "when practical difficulties or practical
hardships result from strict compliance with the provisions of this paragraph, the City may
permit significant tree, specimen tree, and significant woodland removal in excess of the
allowable limits." In essence, the exception is a variance to the tree preservation ordinance.
The City's authority to grant a variance cannot exceed the authority granted by Minnesota
Statutes. A variance may only be granted by the city council. The statutory authority authorizing
the council to grant a variance is found in Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd. 6(2), which allows
variances only in cases of "undue hardship" where:
(1) [T]he property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by the official controls [i.e. zoning regulations]; (2) the plight of the landowner
is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and (3) the
variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic
considerations alone do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the
property exist under the terms of the ordinance.
The next issue to address, therefore, is the application of the "undue hardship" standard. The
finding of "undue hardship" is a determination for the council. The first determination is
whether the property can be put to reasonable use without the variance from the allowable tree
removal. Minnesota courts have held that this first requirement does not mean that a property
owner must show that the land cannot be put to any use without a variance, but rather to a
reasonable use. Each request for an exception, or variance, must be analyzed as to whether
under the facts and circumstances it would be reasonable to require the applicant to abide by the
tree removal requirements. The second requirement of the statutory "undue hardship" standard
is that the plight of the landowner be due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by
the landowner. As to the location of a tree, it would be hard to imagine that it was created by the
landowner. With respect to the amount of trees needed to be removed, it is a balance between the
location of the trees and the ability to use the property in a reasonable manner. The final
requirement of "undue hardship" is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the locality. The property owner has the burden to establish an "undue hardship".
Finally, the granting of a variance should be the exception and not the rule.
2. "Heritage" Tree.
The Advisory Park and Recreation Commission is exploring the option of protecting "heritage"
trees under the tree preservation regulations of the City Code. The general provisions of a
"heritage" tree regulation would protect unique trees, based on species, age, historical
significance, ecological value, aesthetics, location or other unique characteristics, within the
City.
To date, research has found no case law specifically addressing this issue, but our office will
continue searching. Generally, the City may enact regulations which protect and preserve trees,
including "heritage" trees, provided the City can establish that such regulation promotes the
public health, safety and welfare. However, where application of a "heritage" tree regulation
makes a property useless or prohibits any meaningful use, such regulation may be deemed as an
unlawful "taking."
If you have any further questions regarding the foregoing issues, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
SKH/j It
cc: Mike Ridley, Senior Planner
APrC - Recreation Sub-committee
Summary of March 8, 2001 meeting
Agenda:
I Review Concession Trailer Physical characteristics: The trailer is a 20x8' Wells Cargo trailer
custom made for concessions use. Please see attached photo-copies.
II Review schedule for this year: Please see the attached tentative schedule. In addition, Eagan Parks
and Rec. intend to test the concession trailers effectiveness at some fall programs.
- Review Operations
A.Fiscal objective: While staff believes that the concession opertations provide service, staff need to
assure that the operational costs are met and that adequate revnue is generated.
B. Physical requirements associated with its portable use: While the trailer is portable, the following
considerations are associated with its use at any site:
- Electric power is required. (A generator can be utilized)
- Access to water is important.
- Equipment and food items need to be secured.
- Loss of power for any long period of time will require alternate storage of product that is refrigerated.
- Coordination of transportation of the trailer.
Due to the complexities of the trailers physical operation, management of the trailer at all times will be
Eagan Parks and Recreation responsibility.
C. Event scheduling: Existence of the trailer at Lexington / Diffley and the potential to have it service
fields 6-8 at Northview present some change for past arrangements of concession operations associated
with several weekend tournaments. Staff suggests that we consider each event on an individual basis and
coordinate service with the responsible event organizer.
1. Arrangements to date have consisted of any of the following:
- Park and Recreation provides concessions.
- The host association provides concessions.
- No concessions available.
2. For events that are a routine part of any organizations schedule ( such as, local in-house program year
end events ) that are conducive to offering concessions, it is staffs' position that the associations provide
their own concession sales. It will be their responsibility to meet concession operation requirements.
Concession opportunities at events hosted by outside groups will be considered individually.
3. Some event hosts wish to offer concessions, but are not interested in the operation. From past experience,
staff knows that not every event is conducive to meeting our fiscal objective. Staff suggests that the
Department be given the flexibility to negotiate the extent of service if requested as part of any event.
IV Misc. updates on Recreation programs: Jeff distributed copies of the current Discover activities
brochure. There are over 60 pages filled with opportunities for any age group.
Paula Nowariak gave a overview of efforts to date to meet the needs of the teenage market in our
community. This is a challenging market to serve as interests seem to be ever-changing. Some success has
been gained by involving the teens in our planning. Efforts will continue - leading to increased
opportunities for teens as part of the Teen Center as planned within the Community Center.
Approved March 19, 2001
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PRE-MEETING ORIENTATION
A brief introductory session was held for new APrC members in the Community Room prior to the Regular
Meeting. Director Ken Vraa had each APrC member introduce themselves, then Parks and Recreation staff
introduced themselves and described their role with the department. Director Vraa spoke briefly about their role as
an advisory body. Elections were held for chair, vice-chair, and secretary, information release forms and oath of
office forms were distributed and returned.
Positions:
4 Chair: John Rudolph
4 Vice-Chair: Dorothy Peterson
4 Secretary: Terry Davis
Subcommittees:
Recreation Acquisition/ Development Natural Resources
John Rudolph Joseph Bari N. Mark Fillipi
Melvin Williams Dorothy Peterson George Kubik
David Wright Terry Davis
Margo Danner
Richard Pletcher
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF Febraury 15, 2001
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:06 p.m. on February 15,
2001 with all Commission Members present. Staff present include Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation;
Jeff Asfahl, Superintendent of Recreation; Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent; Eric Macbeth Water Resources
Coordinator; Loudi Rivamonte, Youth Development Coordinator and Beth Wielde, Administrative Specialist filling
in for Recording Secretary Cherryl Mesko.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Member George Kubik moved to approve the agenda, Member Dorothy Peterson seconded, with all voting
in favor to approve the agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF December 18, 2000, and January 11, 2001
Chair Rudolph noted on page 3, 2nd paragraph of the December 18, 2000 minutes, "After further
discussion, Daryle Peterson moved, Terry Davis seconded with all members voting in favor..." should be amended
to state, "Chair Rudolph abstained from voting."
There we no alterations to the January 11, 2001 minutes. Member Terry Davis moved to approve both
minutes with the amendments to the December 18 set. Member Kubik seconded, with all members voting for
approval.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 2
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors who wished to address the Commission under this agenda item.
ART HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE KAY GUSTAFSON
Superintendent Jeff Asfahl introduced Kay Gustafson, Arts & Humanities Council representative, and Jill
Otto, recent addition to the program. Gustafson gave a brief history of the Arts and Humanities Council, which
started in 1997 as a group of 5 people who wanted to provide an opportunity for children to explore the arts outside
of a school setting. The group worked with Dorothy Peterson, who was on staff at the City at the time, to assist in
developing the program. Peterson help the group secure use of the McCarthy House. In the early phases, the
program had 40 students. Since this time, the program has grown, renovating the garage to handle the changing
needs of the group.
The Art House has merged with a group in West St. Paul to form the non-profit Dakota County Center for
the Arts. By 1998, there were 120 participants in the programs. These numbers continue to grow, 400 participants
in 1999, and over 800 in 2000.
Gustafson described the organizational structure, including the 14 member Board of Directors, all
community volunteers. Program growth demonstrated the need for a staff person, so Jill Otto was hired to fill that
role. Gustafson stated the Arts & Humanities Council works with a $50,000 budget, which is mostly retained from
class fees. She stated the mission/vision of the council, which is to develop, promote, and encourage participation
in and appreciation for the arts, and encourage art education to all ages.
Gustafson gave credit to the Parks and Recreation department for their ability and willingness to work with
the Arts and Humanities Council. She described some of the programs that are coming up, including the Council's
assuming responsibility for the Yankee Doodle Arts & Crafts Festival, continuing the Friday Night Music programs,
and the Multicultural Festival.
Gustafson illustrated how art is a catalyst for bringing people together, and noted activities intended for
families and seniors. She stated their hopes to continue their current practices. Gustafson introduced Jill Otto, who
displayed some of the works produced by art house members, including oil painting, pottery, and collage.
Gustafson concluded with an anecdote about an Art House participant who experienced personal growth while
attending programs, and how art benefits a broad range of people.
Member Peterson congratulated Gustafson on her visions and presentation. Member Davis noted that
employers often give tax-deductible matching gift contributions to non-profits such as the Art House.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
Parks Superintendent Paul Olson discussed a variety of issues happening in the Parks Division, including
his attendance at the Lebanon Hills Stakeholders Task Force. He noted that there was some consensus that this
would be one of the last general meetings of the task force as a whole. It will soon be released for public comment.
He also discussed:
4 Skating rinks, stating that the cold weather has allowed the rinks to stay open later, but after this
week, B and C sites will close, although A sites, those with rink lights, will remain open.
4 Staff and County staff working as the "E-team" (stands for Erosion Team) have been meeting to
discuss erosion issues. There is a meeting scheduled on March 22 to talk with developers about
erosion issues.
4
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 3
The 2001 budget approved a new maintenance position. This employee was hired in-house from
the Utility department, and should begin duties in April.
Framework for the new Holz Farm shed is up.
Forestry staff is planning for Arbor Day Event, Saturday May 5 at Lexington-Diffley, and the tree
sale, Saturday, April 8 at the maintenance facility.
Member Joe Bari asked what type of trees would be sold this year. Superintendent Olson said they were
likely the same type of trees as last year, and that Forester Hove has already ordered them. Specific types will be
listed in the spring Discover Us brochure.
Chair Rudolph stated he liked the idea of the "E-Team" as a way to bring attention to the erosion issue.
Olson noted the growth in attendance by staff members Member Kubik also compliment Olson and the E-Team on
their efforts. He said he would like to see a report of the results when the study is complete.
Recreation Superintendent Jeff Asfahl discussed the kick-off of regular senior meetings on Monday,
February 21, from 9:00 to 1:00. These meetings will discuss recreation and leisure opportunities for Eagan's
seniors. Superintendent Asfahl also discussed:
4 Many of the winter leagues are wrapping up, with the exception of basketball and volleyball,
which will continue into March.
4 Summer softball packets have been mailed.
4 On Saturday, January 27, the Annual Winter Ice Event was held at Blackhawk Park.
4 EAA has completed Super Sign Up. The programs are growing, particularly soccer.
For the next 6 to 8 weeks, staff will be working on field space allocation.
4 The spring Discover Us brochure has been mailed.
E Recreation staff is planning for summer and fall events and programs.
4 Preschool programs are flourishing.
4 Winter Youth Development programs began January 15`h at Quarry and Wescott Parks.
The preschool program held a field trip to the Children's Museum in St. Paul on Wednesday,
January 15.
4 Per the 2001 budget, a portable concession trailer has been ordered. The recreation subcommittee
was asked to help staff develop policies regarding the concessions trailer.
Member Danner thanked Superintendent Asfahl for mentioning the seniors program, and mentioned the
technical trouble in getting seniors activity announcements into the newspapers. Member Peterson asked about field
enhancements for travel baseball, and Superintendent Asfahl stated there have been meetings to discuss amenities,
turf, and field improvements, although there is more yet to do. Chair Rudolph suggested the week of March 5 for a
recreation subcommittee meeting. A recreation subcommittee meeting was established for Thursday, March 8 at
5:30.
CONSENT AGENDA
ECOLAB ADDITION- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Parks and Recreation Director Ken Vraa gave a brief background on the development, which includes a lot
split at the existing Ecolab site. The subdivision will create two lots, one for the existing building and one to be
sold. There are no tree preservation issues associated with this site. There are no water quality issues associated
with this site. Should future development occur on the site, the plat will need to come back for standard review
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 4
practices. Member Dorothy Peterson moved to approve the recommended preliminary subdivision, Chair Rudolph
seconded, with all members voting to consent.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
There were no development proposals for the APrC to review.
OLD BUSINESS
Administrative Specialist Beth Wielde provided an update on progress of Phase II of the Off-Leash Dog
Area (OLDA) study. There has been some preliminary investigation into potential sites, public support, and
alternative funding sources, but the County has suggested meeting about a potential joint project. Work on the
project is on hold until after this meeting, to determine if the County would like to be involved. The County has
added a section on OLDAs in their draft Park System Plan, although this does not mean a County commitment.
Member Pletcher inquired whether Off-Leash Dog Areas are enclosed. Director Vraa stated there were
two primary ways of delineating OLDA boundaries, both natural/vegetative buffers and fencing. Specialist Wielde
noted that both types of fencing require the owner to have voice and visual control over their pets.
NEW BUSINESS
PARK LIGHTING
Superintendent Olson described the difference between high-level parking lot lighting and low-level
security lighting. Olson stated that Dakota Electric Association was willing to work with the City on supplying and
installing security lighting, where parking lot lighting would require a consultant. Dakota Electric Association
would allow for perpetual maintenance for a $5 per pole maintenance fee for each pole they install. Although it is
common for staff to work with parking lot lighting issues, Dakota Electric would cover a great deal of the cost for
security lighting. Olson emphasized that Dakota Electric Associates are not an electrical contractor, but are willing
to work with the City on optimal siting of security lights.
Olson also discussed light pole options. Three available types include metal, concrete, and fiberglass.
Fiberglass and concrete are most commonly used in Eagan parks, about a 50/50 split.
Olson indicated that the hope is to install lighting at the ballfields at Lexington-Diffley, and showed the
concept plan drawn up by Dakota Electric as an example. Security lighting at the entrance of Northview is desired.
Member Bari asked where additional lighting would go at Northview Park, and Olson stated that lighting was only
examined at this point at Lexington Diffley to conserve time in case the project did not take this direction. Olson
stated that staff would work with Dakota Electric to determine the optimum lighting plans for Blackhawk and
Northview.
Olson noted that the intended lighting sites are not programmed for use in the off-peak season. Member
Peterson asked if it was possible to turn off the security lighting during the off-season. Olson indicated that this
would likely not be possible, since the lights operate on photo cells rather than timers. Member Pletcher inquired if
the security lighting came on any time it got dark. Olson replied that this is correct, and parking lot lighting, while
it would allow for more control, would require more staff time.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 5
Member Peterson inquired if the Department were to work with Dakota Electric, would the City still have a
choice of lighting fixtures. Olson indicated that this will be dealt with momentarily. Member Wright asked what
the priority was for lighting on the Lexington-Diffley ballfields. Olson stated that ballfield lighting in conceptual at
this time, that it would be far in the future. Field demand would indicate the need for further study.
Olson stated that the fields are primarily used for youth slow-pitch softball/baseball. When the fields were
originally created, transformers were installed for future lighting opportunities. Director Vraa expanded on the
growth anticipated when the parks and fields were planned.
Member Kubik asked who would be responsible if security lights were vandalized. Superintendent Olson
said Dakota Electric would be responsible for this. Olson then described the variety of light fixtures and pole types.
He also discussed cost implications denoted in the CIP. The CIP projects $50,000 for Blackhawk Park, $50,000 for
Northview Park, and $75,000 for Lexington-Diffley lighting systems. If fiberglass security lighting was used, the
cost would be around $31,000 for the Lexington Diffley site. He mentioned that concrete posts are $1,400 more per
post than fiberglass. Estimated costs of parking lot lights about double the cost of security lights. Olson requested
that the APrC consider whether it is appropriate to install security lights at the three sites, recommend the type of
pole, and the scope of the project; whether it is to be security lights at all proposed sites, or some combination
thereof.
Chair Rudolph stated that the proposal identified some partnership potential with Dakota Electric for
security lights that would reduce cost to the City tremendously. He stated that it appears to be an easy decision.
Member Peterson moved that staff proceed with fiberglass pole security lights at Lexington Diffley and Northview
Park, concrete security lights at Blackhawk for continuity, and work with Dakota Electric in all cases. Member
Davis seconded.
Member Davis also asked whether the $5 per pole per month includes electric fee, and whether the light is
on every night every day of the year. He also asked what the typical cost is for lamps on a timer. Olson stated the
cost of lamps is about $25 to $50 per lamp, and a consultant would need to be brought in to retrofit existing lights.
Member Wright asked about residential concerns with new lighting, and Superintendent Olson said at Lexington-
Diffley, light spread would not be noticeable. Light spill is more from nearby commercial buildings. He also noted
that Blackhawk Park is heavily wooded, which creates a buffer area to shield light.
Member Pletcher inquired if Northview had the worst time with light spill. Olson indicated that most of
the lighting occurs in the back of the park, and that light spill is not a significant issue. Member Davis inquired how
far south toward residential property the security lights would go, and Superintendent Olson showed the intended
light placements, and noted that there was no intent to light the whole park, just the indicated area for security and
intersection safety. Member Davis noted that staff may want to get in touch with adjacent homeowners who may
be impacted.
Member Kubik inquired as to the durability of the fiberglass poles. Olson noted that the durability of fiberglass and
concrete is very close. Member Bari inquired from where the monthly fee is funded. Olson replied there is a line
item in the operational budget for these things.
Chair Rudolph called for the vote, all voting in favor for Member Peterson's motion of staff proceeding with
fiberglass security lights at Northview and Lexington Diffley, and concrete at Blackhawk Park, and working with
Dakota Electric.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 6
WATER RESOURCES UPDATE
SCHWANZ LAKE CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP PROJECT FINAL REPORT
Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth gave background into the Schwan Lake Clean Water
Partnership program. The program started as a grant. The project will close by gaining City Council approval for
closure. In 1992, the City studied water quality in Schwanz Lake, which was considered a degraded water body.
The 1990 Water Plan outlined Schwan as being a potentially swimmable lake. Phosphorus was entering the water
body from direct drainage. Macbeth discussed strategies used to alleviate this:
Public information/ education, including children's programs about water.
Public action
Storm drain labeling, which lets people know what lake each grate drains to.
Street sweeping study
Monitoring water quality
Stormwater monitoring
Weed harvesting
4 Sub-project fishing pier on Schwanz Lake
Herbicide treatment
Macbeth showed watershed exhibits, and discussed future trends and piping efforts done as part of the
grant. One effort Macbeth wished to address is the reduction of curlyleaf pondweed. He discussed other challenges
and successes of the project. There are water quality improvements in the lake, though the level of precipitation has
been lower than normal. There is a direct relation between precipitation and phosphorus levels.
Member Kubik asked what the flushing rate is. Macbeth stated that he would need to look that up for the
definite answer, but it may be within the 30-40 day rate. He would be happy to check. Member Peterson asked if
Macbeth used 1999 figures, and Macbeth stated that they had. Member Peterson commented that 2000 figures
would have skewed results due to the Superstorm. Chair Rudolph complimented Macbeth on the report. Macbeth
offered hard copies of the report if anyone wanted one. Member Danner inquired about the size and depth of the
lake, and the fish within the lake. Macbeth stated that the lake is 12 acres and 13 feet deep. He also noted that the
DNR stocked channelcatfish in the lake, even if nobody has caught any. Catfish act as a predator to help enhance
the fish life in the lake.
Chair Rudolph moved to recommend Council accept the project and report, and continue completion of the
project. Member Wright seconded. Member Kubik asked if the APrC needed to add a "priority management"
section. Chair Rudolph did not see this as necessary. All members voted in favor of the recommendation.
LOWER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT
PROPOSED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth provided background on the request from the Lower Minnesota
Watershed District, which covers the northwest comer of the City, and encompasses about 10% of the City. They
request a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) from all cities within the watershed district for a cooperative arrangement,
which basically puts into document form efforts that are currently underway. This would give the district oversight
for any new development that would impact the watershed.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 7
Member Peterson inquired if this gives the Watershed Management District the right of refusal. Macbeth
said that they have ultimate regulatory authority, but it would be a collaborative effort, and that it is already
informally part of the City's internal process. Proposals go to the watershed management district as part of the
City's review process. Member Bari asked if the City Attorney has reviewed the agreement. Macbeth wasn't
certain, but said he would make certain that this is done. Member Bari asked if the District would have to approve
each development. Macbeth said that the District wants to provide pre-approval comments. Member Bari asked if
this would give them power to deny developments, and Macbeth stated that they could provide comments only.
Member Bari inquired if the Water Quality staff had the staff resources to implement this agreement. Macbeth said
that they are not considering a new staff position for this, since Eagan already makes this effort. Chair Rudolph
asked if staff was aware of any community that has not joined. Macbeth is not aware of the status for any other city
in regards to this issue.
George Kubik moved to approve the joint powers agreement, with the amendment by Member Bari that the
City Attorney review and approve. Member Davis seconded, with all members voting in favor.
OTHER UPDATES (WATER QUALITY)
Macbeth addressed clarification regarding the Supreme Court decision, a 5-4 vote, to reinforce and expand
federal to state devolution of power. Macbeth gave a background on the case in question. He continued to explain
state power over created wetlands. The Corps of Engineers is still sorting out the decision. It seems that
Minnesota's current regulations, which are very detailed, the ruling will have minimal impact on current City
procedure. Macbeth is unaware of any Eagan sites the decision will impact.
He also shared a department award, the Wetland Health Evaluation Process, year 2000 Achievement
Award. He discussed the solar powered aerator on East Thomas Lake, and showed photographs of the aerator in
action.
OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
COMMUNICATION- ATTORNEY RESPONSE RE HARDSHIP INTERPRETATION
This issue has been deferred to the March 19, 2001 meeting.
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
Youth Development Coordinator Loudi Rivamonte presented an update on Youth Development efforts.
She noted how the program started in the Wescott Area as a program for underserved youth. She noted efforts by
School District, Dakota County HRA, the City, and the Wescott Neighborhood to serve this faction. The program
has since expanded to Quarry Park. Rivamonte noted the dedicated staff serves over 100 participants per trimester,
and the program has expanded. Promotional campaigns include targeting schools and apartment managers to help
spread the word. Rivamonte described efforts to partner with EFC programs to combine events. She also described
the programs offered, and recent expansion of programs to Rahn and Diffley parks, although these have proven a
challenge because there is no centralized place to hold meetings.
Some of the barriers faced by Youth Development staff include personnel at the apartments since managers
change frequently, and funding. Rivamonte has managed to secure alternative funding, however. She also
discussed socioeconomic issues related to Youth Development including transient population and frequent
changeover, high crime rates, and a demographic shift. Rivamonte discussed the increase in the Somali population,
and the subsequent need for staff education in Somali culture and the Islam religion.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001
Page 8
Rivamonte discussed the barriers faced by programming at the Quarry Park site, included social isolation,
and lack of cooperation in promoting programs. But, she said, numbers had doubled last year. She noted that the
demographics in Quarry Park are also changing, and now about 60% of the population is from India or Russia.
The program, Rivamonte continued, is focused on reducing risk factors. She also noted that there was
going to be a Somali reception on Saturday, February 17. She noted the use of a cultural "broker" rather than
interpreter, which, helps interpret the cultural mores rather than just interpreting the language. She expressed
interest in having monthly meetings with the Somali groups.
Chair Rudolph noted that he has seen similar demographic shifts in the schools. Member Bari
complimented Rivamonte, "Mother Theresa has nothing on you!" and member Danner asked what time on
Saturday the reception would be held. Rivamonte said it is 11:00 and everyone is welcome.
SET CIP MEETING DATE
Director Vraa suggested holding the CIP meeting either on the 21s1 of February or the 15` of March, 5:15 or
5:30 in the 2"d floor conference room. The meeting was set for February 21st.
ROUND TABLE
Member Bari stated the he sensed the APC is frequently credited for preliminary plat review in the Council
minutes, that the APrC's participation is overlooked. Director Vraa suggested bringing it up at the March meeting,
and he noted that the APC action echoed the APrC action on the Finch Place development. Member Davis noted
that there is often no historic record of the APrC's participation in development review in the Council minutes.
Chair Rudolph stated that this may change now that there is a former APrC member on the Council.
Member Peterson asked about the status of the Conditional Use permit presented during the January
meeting. Director Vraa said that this would need to be checked on.
Director Vraa noted the two attachments to the packet, the "Morning After" memo produced by Admin
Specialist Wielde, and an article about the evolution of playground equipment.
ADJOURNMENT
Member Peterson moved to adjourn, Chair Rudolph seconded, with all members voting in favor to adjourn
at 9:25.
Secretary
Advisory Parks Commission