04/16/2001 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION Fparking EAGAN, MINNESOTA edar Pond Park
oat Hill Park
Monday, Apri l 16, 2001
7:00 PM y Hall, upper level
Eagan Municipal Center at 6:00 pm
City Council Chambers
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 pm
B. Approval of Agenda 7:02 pm
C. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 15, 2001 7:04 pm
D. Visitors to be Heard 7:09 pm
E. Superintendent's Update and Department Happenings Pages 1 - 4 7:15 pm
F. Consent Agenda
(1) Arbor Day Proclamation Page 5 7:25 pm
(2) Grand Oak 3 Preliminary Subdivision- Interstate Partners Pages 6 - 9 7:35 pm
G. Old Business
(1) Skateboard Parks Page 10 - 25 7:45 pm
(2) Cedar Pond Best Management Practices Project Page 26 - 27 8:05 pm
H. New Business
(1) Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy Page 28 8:20 pm
1. Water Resources Update 8:40 pm
J. Other Business and Reports 8:50 pm
(1) 2000 Annual Report
(2) Joint Commission/ Council Meeting- May 15
(3) Preschool Program Update Pages 29 - 31
(4) Winter Program Report. Pages 32 - 35
(5) Review Comments- Lebanon Hills Regional Park Master Plan
Executive Summary Page 36
(6) Schedule Workshop- Moonshine Park
K. Round Table Page 37 9:30 pm
L. Adjournment 9:40 pm
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities, and
employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or
status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96
hours in advance of the event. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City will attempt to provide the aids.
Arbor Day Poster Judging to Follow Meeting in the
Engineering Conference Room
Next APrC Meeting: May 14, 2001
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
2001 MEMBERS
NAME AND ADDRESS Release TERM TELEPHONE TERM
Phone # START EXPIRES
-11
JOSEPH BARI Yes 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 1/2002
3033 Timberwood Trail (3 yr. 1999)
Eagan, MN 55121
MARGO DANNER Yes 2001 651/454-5688 (H) 1/2004
2037 Flint Lane
Eagan, MN 55122
TERRY DAVIS Yes 1997 651-452-2635 (H) 1/2003
4895 Safari Pass (3 n• 1997) 651-310-8941 (W)
Eagan, MN 55122-2690 (3 yr. 2000) 452-2152 (Home fax)
terTy.davis@StPaul.com
N. MARK FILIPI Yes May, 651-602-1725 (W) 1/2003
836 Overlook Place 1997 mark.fi11p1@metc4tate.mn.us
Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr. 1998)
GEORGE KUBIK Yes 1993 651-452-3887 (H) 1/2002
3053 Pine Ridge Drive (3 yr. 1996) 612-713-5315 (W)
Eagan, MN 55121 (3 yr. 1999) George_Kubik@mail.fws.gov
DOROTHY PETERSON Yes 2000 651-454-6532 (H) 1/2003
4337 Sequoia Drive (3 yr. 2000)
Eagan, MN 55122
RICHARD PLETCHER (altemate) Yes 2001 651-687-9177 (H) 1/2004
1074 Northview Park
Eagan, MN 55123
JOHN RUDOLPH Yes 1993 952-454-8761 (H) 1/2003
1644 Norwood Court (3 yr. 1998) 952-707-2402 (Fax)
Eagan, MN 55122 952-707-2526 (voicemail) 10/15/00
jrudol h@bumsville.k 12.mn.us
MELVIN WILLIAMS Yes 2001 651-994-6727 (H) 1/2004
823 Wescott Square
Eagan, MN 55123
DAVID WRIGHT Yes 2001 651-687-9336 (H) 1/2004
4671 Parlaidge Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
Eagan City Staff E-Mail:
kvraaCad.eagan.mn.us cmeskoCCci.eagan.mn.us polsonCd)ci.eagan.mn.us iasfahlCci.eagan.mn.us
ghoveCci.eagan.mn.us emacbethzci.eagan.mn.us bwieldeC-ci.eagan.mn.us
Phone # 651-681-4661 (Cherryl's # after 4:30 p.m.)
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: Advisory Park Commission
FROM: Ken Vraa, Parks & Recreation Director
DATE: April 9, 2001
SUBJECT: Cover Memo Briefing: April 16 Commission Meeting
The April Commission meeting will be preceded by a tour of two park sites. We will leave from the
Parks and Recreation offices on the East side at 6:00 p.m , then visit Cedar Pond Park and Goat Hill
Park. Cedar Pond Park was selected because agenda item G-2 has an issue pertaining to this park.
Goat Hill was selected because it is one of three sites for further consideration as a skate park, and is
currently one of the pre-school program sites used.
The Commission is again being asked to participate in the poster judging contest to select next years
Arbor Day poster. This will immediately follow the conclusion of the commission meeting in the lower
level conference room.
Item E. Superintendents Olson and Asfahl will provide an update on departmental activities
during the last month and preview upcoming activities.
Item F Two items are for consideration under the consent agenda: A resolution to the City
Council proclaiming May 5, 2001 as Arbor Day in Eagan (information contained in
packet) and approval of the Grand Oaks 0 Addition. (information also contained in
the packet). A single motion to approve is in order.
Item G There are two items under old business, the first is part two of the staffs report on skate
parks. The focus is on potential locations, estimated costs and financing alternatives.
Staff is looking for commission discussion on this item and direction on proceeding
further. This has potential to be an agenda item for discussion with the City Council at
a joint meeting now tentatively scheduled for May 15.
Cedar Pond Park was previously approved for a grant submission. During the tour and
at the regular meeting staff will provide information about the design for development
of the aquatic plant restoration project. Staff seeks a recommendation to proceed.
Item H City staff has been consolidating separate erosion and sedimentation control policies
and required practices into one policy statement,. This policy was distributed at an
erosion control workshop that builders and developers were invited to attend. After
extensive review by staff and the city attorney, it is recommended for review and
approval.
Item I There are no items under water resources.
Item J 1) Distribution of the departments 2000 Annual Report. This abbreviated report
highlights departmental activities.
2) Notification of a joint commission and council workshop, tentatively set for
Tuesday, May 15; at 5:00. The commission may want to identify agenda items at this
time or forward your thoughts to the commission chair.
3) A report on the pre-school program by Paula Nowariak. There is no action required.
4) A report on this past winters' skating and activities by Cathy Bolduc.
5) A summary of the Lebanon Hills Regional Master Plan is included in the packet. The
draft document is out for public comment. Staff is coordinating collection of responses,
or if you prefer, individual comments by commission members may be made directly o
the County.
6) The City Council is looking forward to receiving the Commissions' recommendation
on a preferred park plan for Moonshine Park. Since the structural analysis of the house
has been completed, such a recommendation is now in order. Staff suggests a
workshop of the development committee be set in order to make a recommendation to
the commission at the May meeting.
Item K Round Table
Item L Adjournment. .
As always, if you are unable to attend the meeting, please let the office know.
Respec y tted,
Ken
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
2001 MEETING SCHEDULE
NAME Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
15 19 16 21 18 16 20 13 15 19 17 21
Joseph Bari x X
Margo Danner x X
Terry Davis x X O*
N. Mark Filipi X X
George Kubik x O*
Dorothy Peterson x X
Richard Pletcher (alt) X X
John Rudolph x X
Melvin Williams x X
David Wright x X -EE
X = present O = absent O* = notified staff of absence prior to meeting
Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee
John Rudolph N. Mark Filipi Joseph Bari
Melvin Williams George Kubik Dorothy Peterson
David Wright Terry Davis
Margo Danner
Richard Pletcher
UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES
1. Commission Review Workshop
2. Spring Maintenance Demonstration
3. Review revenue sources in lieu of park dedication
4. Review Docks
5. Seasonal easement at top of Trapp Farm tubing hill
6. Wetland and Setback Buffers
7. Workshop to review packet format/content
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS- April
Recreation Division
• Eagan seniors are making more frequent appearances at programs and trips offered by
the Parks and Recreation Department. The April trip to the Como Park Conservatory
brought 34 people to see large indoor garden displays on a gloomy day. Following little
more than a week later, 26 people visited Bachman's Garden Center on Lyndale for a
tour of their operations. In May, another 27 people will be going to Chanhasssen for
dinner and a theatre production. In addition to the trip success, 15 to 20 people are
regularly attending the Wednesday morning activities in the Community Room of the
Eagan Municipal Center.
• Sumner softball teams attended Manager's Meetings on Thursday, April 12. 208
softball teams will be participating in leagues on Sunday through Friday evenings. The
annual Two-game tune-up is scheduled for April 21 but due to the wet field conditions
it might have to be cancelled.
• Men's Leagues -127 teams
• Women's Leagues- 33 teams (highest number in over 10 years)
• Co-Rec Leagues - 48 teams
• The 2001 Softball Manager Handbook cover was once again printed and assembled free
of charge by Lyn-Mar Printing of Eagan. Thanks again to Les & Becky Hanson for the
donation of their services.
• Concessions crew staff training was held on Tuesday, April 10 for all the new staff
Staff is continuing to get ready for the upcoming softball season and delivery of the
concessions trailer, which should arrive in late April.
• The Sports Program Supervisor continues to develop and maintain a home page for the
adult sports leagues offered through the department. Some mergers have occurred with
Active.com (current location) and Eteamz.com. This merger has created an easier site to
maneuver and administer. The downfall is that the url address changed, but information
will be passed along to teams at the upcoming manager's meetings.
• The Holz Farm spring clean-up day is scheduled for Saturday May 5 h from 9-12.
Volunteers are needed to assist with a general clean-up of the grounds. The annual
Garden Club plant sale will take place Saturday May 12th from 8:30 am - 2:00 and the
annual Spring Festival is scheduled for Sunday May 2& from noon-4.
• Plans are in place to utilize the "Puppet Wagon" at a variety of programs and events this
spring and summer. Known appearance dates thus far are: May 31- as part of the
Community Services Open House event, the July O Festival, and other appearances at
several Summer in the Park sites, programs at Wescott and Quarry, and pre-school
programs-
• Considering the late departure of snow and soggy conditions, the local youth athletic
programs have been advised that we may have difficulty meeting traditional
expectations of having fields in game playing condition by May 1.
• The next issue of the Discover activities brochure will be distributed to Eagan residents
the week of May 8 h.
• To protect the City of Eagan's exposure to liability, staff is working with the local youth
athletic associations to ensure they follow State Health Department guidelines when
providing concessions as part of their events.
1
• The Youth Development program in partnership with Storefront Mosaic Group will be
hosting a community round table discussion for the Somali community on Saturday,
April 21" from 11:00 -1:00 p.m. at Glacier Hills Elementary School.
• Spring Break numbers have been moderate at both Quarry and Wescott sites this year.
The highlight of both weeks has been the use of the Civic Arena turf for fun, games and
sports.
Parks Division
• The almost annual tree sale will take place at the Maintenance facility on Saturday April
28". Based on the most recent tally of orders nearly all of the plant materials have been
sold. Any material that is not sold through the ordering period will be offered on a first
come basis inunediately following the scheduled pickup time on the 28 h. Materials not
sold that day are used for park projects.
• Staff has nearly completed the sweeping of boulevard trails. The excessive amount of
sand on the trails has made for very slow going. The County will be sweeping and
picking up sand from the grass medians and intersection islands. The general `Yule of
thumb" is that the City will sweep those trails located along County roads and those
boulevards it mows during the summer.
• Again this year, Eagan third grade students were invited to participate in the annual
Arbor Day poster contest. The selected poster is subsequently printed as a frameable
poster by the West Group and used for Arbor Day festivities the following year. The
poster contest has proven to be an opportunity to educate students about not only Arbor
Day but also the importance of trees. Each year approximately 1400 students take part.
Following the Park Commission meeting, Park Commissioners are encouraged to stay
and take part in the selection of this years winning poster, which will be printed for use
next year. Prior to the meeting staff will have narrowed the field down to approximately
10 posters for Commission review. The "top" three posters from each of the schools, as
selected by staff, will be recognized at the respective school. The poster selected by the
Commission will be unveiled at the Arbor Day event on May 5 b at Lexington-Diffiey
Park.
• The late departure of snow and the recent rains have delayed work on fields and courts.
Staff began the process of putting up tennis nets the week of April 9 h. Work on infields
has begun however each rain has been another set back. The first tournament is
scheduled for the weekend of April 28 b at Northview. Unlike recent years, this is no
sure bet.
• Requests for Proposal have been sent to vendors for the provision of the playground
equipment to be installed at Cinnamon Ridge and Peridot Path Parks. Each vendor is
provided with the budget amount for each site and told to provide designs that maximize
the dollars available. The selection is based upon creativity and "play value for the
dollar". Staff hopes to place the orders by May 11"' to allow for delivery in early
summer.
• The equipment for the next phase of the Glacier Hills Elementary School playground
has been delivered to the City Maintenance Facility. The equipment was purchased by
the school through an intensive funding raising effort conducted by students and the
PTO. City staff will begin installing the equipment in mid-June. Because school
Z
playgrounds are considered be an amenity available for public use, the City has assisted
with the installation of equipment at a number of Eagan elementary schools.
• Through a contract with Dakota County, a Sentence to Service Crew will begin work in
Eagan the week of April 23`x. The City is allocated approximately seven weeks of "crew
time" over the course of the year. Scheduling is done in cooperation with three other
local municipalities that contract for the service. The crews perform unskilled labor
under the direction of a County supervisor. The initial tasks they will be assigned in
Eagan include the clean up of bridge decks and ponds, and mulching landscape beds
surrounding Cascade Bay.
• A number of Eagle Scout candidates will be completing projects for the Department.
Projects include the construction of bat houses and feeders, constructing and installing
benches, distributing informational literature.
• Once again, the Department will be working with the Twin Cities Tree Trust to
complete several park improvement projects. The tentative project list includes the
installation of wooden stairs leading to the fishing pier at Blackhawk Park and the
construction of a volleyball court at the Thomas Lake pavilion. The Tree Trust provides
employment and training opportunities for youth and adults. Each crew has a trained
supervisor and is responsible for their own transportation. There is no cost to the City.
Tree Trust crews have worked in the City for over 10 years.
• Dakota Electric has proved a quotation for the installation of a security light system at
Blackhawk Park. The system is consistent with that presented to the Commission at the
February meeting. The quotation is approximately 30% less than the budgeted amount
however field adjustments and change orders can add additional cost. Informational
letters will be sent to adjoining landowners prior to the start of installation. Work is
expected to start in the early summer.
• Several staff members have recently attended seminars to obtain information regarding
the ever changing standards under which we work. Park Planner/ Landscape Architect,
CJ Lilly, took part in a seminar that outlined the latest accessibility standards for
playground equipment. Superintendent of Parks, Paul Olson, attended a loss control
workshop conducted by The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
• During the past several weeks, a crane has dominated the landscape at Bridle Ridge
Park. The crane is being used to reconstruct a large retaining wall located on private
property immediately south of the park. The wall, which is integral to the support of the
lot and house, began to fail last year as a result of the July mega -storm. Because of the
severe slopes, the only route the heavy equipment can take to access the site is through
the park. To accommodate construction of the wall the City Council has vacated an
unused utility easement along the park boundary. The homeowner has agreed to be
responsible for restoring the damaged turf area and replanting trees.
• The work is expected to take another 2 weeks. Parents of preschoolers in the Bridle
Ridge program have been notified.
• The City's "E-Team" sponsored a very successful erosion control workshop on March
22. In attendance were 12 contractors, builders, and developers and 7 consultants and
staffs from other cities. About a dozen Eagan staff facilitated the all-morning session,
including City Administrator Tom Hedges who led it off. To those of the 100 or so that
were invited but did not attend, workshop handouts were mailed. The theme of the
workshop was "Working Together to Protect Our Wetlands and Natural Resources."
JS
Water Resources Special Project Intern Mike Sowers did an excellent job introducing
and reviewing the draft Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy the E-Team
developed. Review and consideration of this policy is on the agenda of this meeting.
• A committee of parents and staff of Faithful Shepherd Catholic School have began to
develop a core curriculum on wetlands. The school grounds, located on Yankee Doodle
Road east of Lexington, are endowed with a variety of wetlands and ponds that will
allow a very nice outdoor classroom setting there. On March 27, Water Resources
Coordinator Eric Macbeth met with the committee and reviewed basic information
about the wetlands and ponds on site. The City will continue to play a technical support
role with this very motivated group.
14
Date: 4/16/01
Agenda Item: F-1; Arbor Day Resolution
c
Action X
Information
City of Eagan Attachments X 1. Council resolution for
Parks and Recreation MEMO proclamation of Arbor Day
AGENDA ITEM: F-1; ARBOR DAY RESOLUTION
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: GREGG HOVE, CITY FORESTER
ITEM DESCRIPTION: To acknowledge the Arbor Day Resolution setting Saturday, May 5 as Arbor
Day and May, 2001 as Arbor Month in the City of Eagan.
BACKGROUND
• Eagan has received the Tree City USA community designation from the National Arbor
Day Foundation. Each year the Parks and Recreation Department conducts an Arbor
Day program which includes participation in a tree planting project. This year the 15th
annual event will be held at Lexington Di$ley Athletic Fields.
• Eagan has been a Tree City USA community since 1988.
• The resolution was recommended for adoption by the Advisory Parks Commission.
• Recognition as a Tree City is based on efforts by the City to promote tree planting in the
community and the resolution demonstrates that effort.
Scheduled Arbor Day activities include:
8:30-9:00 Public arrival / social hour
9:00-9:15 Welcome and sharing of the Arbor Day schedule by city staff
9:15-9:30 Natural Resource Educational Sessions
a. Prairie Management
b. Tree Planting
9:30-9:45 Ceremonial Tree Installation (Large Tree Spade)
9:45-11:45 Prairie Plant Installation by volunteers (Around ceremonial trees and
3,000 prairie plugs into existing prairie site.)
11:45-12:00 Arbor Day program (City Mayor, Park Superintendent, Supervisor of
Forestry)
12:00-12:30 Lunch served (Outdoor grilled lunch prepared by city staff)
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
1. Acknowledge the resolution setting May 5 as Arbor Day and May as Arbor Month in the
City of Eagan
2. Other
S
Item:
Attachment # I Lam. 5c 1 i=
-rti T'r L I
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION
A PROCLAMATION OF EAGAN ARBOR DAY
AND EAGAN ARBOR MONTH
WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource in the State of Minnesota and City of Eagan -
purifying our air and water, helping conserve our soil, serving as a recreational settings, providing habitat
for wildlife for all kinds, and enriching our lives in so many important ways; and
WHEREAS, pollutants, tree diseases and urban expansion have damaged and continue to threaten
our trees, creating the need for reforestation programs and concerted public action toward ensuring the
future of out City's urban forests; and
WHEREAS, each year the people of Minnesota pay special attention to the wonderful gift that
our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our state's trees; and
WHEREAS, The City of Eagan has been recognized as a Tree City USA community by the
National Arbor Day Foundation since 1988 and desires to continue its tree-planting programs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council does hereby proclaim
Saturday, May 5, 2001 to be ARBOR DAY and the month of May, 2001 to be ARBOR MONTH in the
City of Eagan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council further urge citizens to become more
aware of the importance of trees to the well-being of our community; and to participate in City tree
planting programs which will ensure a greener place for our citizens to live in the decades to come.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
1, M. McGarvey, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 17'hday of April, 2001.
Date: April 11, 2001
Agenda Item: F-2; Grand Oak Three
Action x
City of Eagan Information
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X I.Preliminary Subdivision
2.Site Plan
3.Grading Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. Tree Preservation Plan
AGENDA ITEM: F2, GRAND OAK THREE
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and
wetlands issues that pertain to the Grand Oak Three development.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Interstate Partners LLC is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval to allow the creation of
a two-lot subdivision entitled "Grand Oak Three". The proposed subdivision overlays 22.0 acres
of land located north of TH 55 and east of Blue Water Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 2.
In conjunction with the requested preliminary subdivision, the applicant has also requested a
Rezoning of a portion of the property from an R-1, Residential Single Family zoning designation
to a BP, Business Park designation.
A portion of the subject property is included in the Highway 55 Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Redevelopment District that was created by the City in 1996 with the primary purpose of
removing blighted and inconsistent land uses. To aid in this effort, the City used TIF eligible
expenses to acquire several homes in the Kollofski Plat and to pay for the demolition of the
Airliner and Spruce Motels. In the summer of last year, the City rezoned five former R-1
(Residential Single Family) zoned parcels in the district to BP, Business Park (Lots 1-3, Block 1
and Lots 3 and 4 Block 2, Kolofski's Plat).
The 22.0 acre property in question currently overlays 15 parcels of land (including seven
remaining R-1 zoned parcels) and the recently vacated Lawrence Avenue and Linde Lane. It is
the applicant's intent to consolidate the various parcels of land and former rights-of way into two
lots which would accommodate future Business Park uses. Specifically, proposed Lot 1
measures 12.4 acres in size and Lot 2 measures 9.6 acres. Both lots are to be accessed via Blue
Water Road.
The subject property is presently vacant. The northwestern area of the site overlays a designated
DNR wetand (19-120W) and a stormwater holding pond.
Mature vegetation is concentrated in the central area of the property proximate to the single
family homes that previously occupied the area.
This item for APC consideration on April 24, 2001.
V
PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION:
This development would be responsible for a cash parks and trails dedication.
TREE PRESERVATION:
A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are sixty-eight (68)
significant trees on site. Staff has revised the applicants tree inventory (non-significant trees
were removed from the inventory). Species break down is as follows:
Species Avg Diameter Dia Range Count Percent of Total
(Silver) Maple 19" 791-50" 15 22.1%
Elm 28" 1219-19" 10 14.7%
Poplar 19" 1251-39" 7 10.3%
Ash 11" 7"-19" 7 10.3%
Spruce 20' Hgt 695-13" 6 8.7%
Birch 10" 9"-11" 6 8.7%
Pine 20' Hgt 7"-12" 5 7.4%
Walnut 9" 7"-11" 3 4.4%
Box elder 15" 12"-17" 3 4.4%
Catalpa 21" 1819-23" 2 3.0%
Apple 24" 24" 1 1.5%
Cedar 10" 25' Hgt 1 1.5%
Willow 16" 16" 1 1.5%
This site appears to have such a variety of trees because of its previous use, commercial hotel
and residential. Many of the existing trees were probably installed as landscape trees.
The development as proposed will result in the removal of fifty-three (53) significant trees
(77.9% of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable
tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple-lot, commercial)
is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal more than the
allowable amount, there will be required tree mitigation for this proposal. Required tree
mitigation calculates to thirty-five Category A trees or 70 Category B trees or 140 Category
C trees, or an equivalent combination of the three categories.
The applicant has submitted a tree mitigation plan that has adequate numbers of replacement
trees to fulfill their tree preservation/mitigation requirements, (which will be installed in
addition to their landscape requirements.
WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS:
This proposed 14.6-acre commercial subdivision would be located in the City's F-
watershed, which is in the northwest corner of the city. Stormwater runoff from the
development eventually would enter City Pond FP-1-a Class V (Nutrient Trap)
waterbody-, which is also DNR public water wetland #19-120W.
The required volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the
impervious proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking
lots, driveways, and walks). To meet City water quality requirements, the developer
proposes to direct runoff from the site through treatment ponds adjacent to FP-1.
. 7
Runoff from 10.1 acres of the site containing proposed Building 7 would be directed to
an existing treatment pond that was constructed as part of Grand Oak, Second Addition.
Including an additional offsite drainage area of 2.9 acres, 13 acres of development, with a
combined impervious cover of 69 percent, would contribute stormwater to the existing
treatment pond. A minimum wet-pond volume of 2.0 acre-feet would be needed in the
existing treatment pond; the pond actually contains 2.9 acre-feet of wet-pond volume.
Runoff from the 4.5 remaining acres of the site containing proposed Building 8 would be
directed to a constructed stormwater treatment pond. The impervious coverage of this
part of the site is 62 percent, requiring a stormwater pond with a minimum wet-pond
volume of 0.62 acre-feet covering a minimum surface area of 0.27 acres. The pond would
need a minimum depth of six feet and a 10:1 aquatic bench beginning at the normal water
level. The outlet structure of the pond would need to be consistent with City of Eagan
standards.
The nearby natural wetland (FP-1) was last delineated in July 1997. Wetland
conservation procedures consider wetland delineation reports to be valid for about 5
years. Therefore, no new wetland delineation report is needed. No draining, filling, or
excavating of the wetland is proposed.
To minimize the potential of nearby impacts, and to the extent practicable given existing
infrastructure, the development would need to be set back at least 30 feet from the edge
of the delineated boundary of the wetland. During and after development, a minimum 30-
foot wide buffer of natural undisturbed vegetation along the wetland would need to be
maintained.
EROSION
Erosion control practices should be properly installed and effectively maintained
throughout the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and negative
impacts to down-gradient resources and water quality.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. Recommend approval of the development proposal subject to conditions including:
• Require that any park dedication be met in the form of a cash payment.
• Require that any trail dedication be met in the form of a cash payment.
Water Quality
• This development should meet the City's water quality requirements entirely through on-
site ponding.
• A stormwater pond should be constructed with a minimum wet-pond volume of 0.62
acre-feet and a minimum area of 0.27 acres. The stormwater treatment pond should be
constructed according to NURP standards with a minimum depth of 6 feet, a 10:1 aquatic
bench, and an outlet skimmer according to City design standards.
• To minimize the potential of nearby impacts, and to the extent practicable given existing
infrastructure, the development would need to be set back at least 30 feet from the edge of
the delineated boundary of the wetland. During and after development, a minimum 30-foot
wide buffer of natural undisturbed vegetation along the wetland would need to be
maintained.
• Erosion control practices should be properly installed and effectively maintained
throughout the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and negative impacts
to down-gradient.
Forestry
• The applicant will meet mitigation requirements through on-site planting in accordance
with the approved plan.
• To require that Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot
polyethylene laminate safety netting) be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of
the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be
preserved both on-site and off-site on private property.
• To require that the applicant contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-
construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit
to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree
Protection Fencing.
2. Recommend approval with additional conditions.
3. Recommend denial.
Item:
Attachment # i . 1 • ti s
t i t at J + ~a~•~ ` ~ ~ ~ 9
!'j>~~ ~ii~~'i,iii~i'i,'~i at•i ~t~~ ~S
liq
l7 Ll~i~+t]]I t]t]]]t]$ 0107 >Ri Y JL \ * '
0\Q. r~vj
c~
/
/
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
]Ill LAL
ew.,.M~.. ...o. nr, ww»... . ..o..,. I A S S O C I A T E S
A"tECTs
INmu°R DLS'GNEAS
N
w ..n , :
l INTERSTATE
l~ :iww a':
PARTNERS
LOT 1
SAGAN. MINNESOTA
GRAND OAK 3
BLOCK I
LOTS I & 2
100,000 S.F..~ /
racposee
afcE
~ . \ e:I.a»o i - ' . ~ - (,`(nI Ali
ExISTW, wo
lTI--
~ f~ > /.f:•~ ~'{fir.
WE PLAN,
40,000 F.
MZOPOSED
i . LOT 2 )
N~,IU1.T, b:
SITE PLAN
q P-WO
MTIII ,
1 1
W`x s`s€ Ada Y a ~e•` Item:
^ZaSab z
d ~Ei Ps z I i
nhII 3 _ n . i' Attachment # 3 ,u
if M ML
Vii= Y i j,' j I - ~t ;1 \ - =:_•a ;Hi
r:1
6 ~
W I ~ 5 \I I a r
Y pER 'e ' ~ I
.I X11 `,1 ~ I
61~~ . I / fit:
-V 41"
°i!
o. V~-~ e c / ro i
: ` ~ e,. - ~-gip`.!" . ~ , t Y
' sI ~ i Ifl 'VJS `may ~ ~'i\ ~'/,/7J//~ , ~ • ~l ~t
s GRADING PLAN
.7 '
f s 4 O' Z r Item: v -2 3 T,ri~.1c~
:r 7-
P7Z r.
Attachment # L- 4 Ir
EEp6 p
e G
CO)
CL LL
E F`srE !i~ 'Jae X11€~ eta ?EFee !P$ I : ` i i
E te! e E EE ! ~ 1 lir; Etl ~E ~ ; ~ ' I ~ I ~ ! ~ I !e
lit
e ~~l1 ~ ill~Ql~y~ IEllll ~`!pE 1~~~ ~B itl:t.1;1111'ffl1lEF;gF'Fi: ~ ~ o;
~ !tt !t
IN! E! ~Ilia;e■1;ri:Ili■~■~■elr.■ie!l;~:' s ~
t 9 !fl t1~E !e !@11E ~s E011. l sE 1 e !!s! is
i
- e-1
j
1•.
f , r is t. !
~ ;..•v-: a ` f ./ID 1, "'~j + 7 ` '3
LANDSCAPE PLAN
< Z t !s: - Item:
2 § _ r
Attachment # . I rye .
f-"-
l! 11 l+ 1 i-.r
1 ~ v.s :.~u•:..lo'.t ~ t-+m ~ Imkre.iveo wu- -w _ e ~ O
IIII III III ,.,I, , I .IIII I ~I~il Walser-:arbe,u ! ylL
1 IJJ I 1
- ! I II III lilt I II'i I I I I( I I, 7 t; tt(e~ Z~- to
I III I' I 1' I I IIII I~I.I~I m ii iilll it l II' I { ii i Z Z
771 Il i i I 17 .1 I I~ ' i II IIII!' I I 1 I``j f!!j!I f' ! l r o
. I I I III I III 1 I i I ,Iy~ yy;;~? ! f _ Cr
M U.-
J ~ 1((
~ I
% ,4 k
.left V° !j'~r •.y
gi~
r 1
411
s
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
1, SKATEBOARD PARKS
FAttackments 9/01
City of Eagan MEMO 1. Site Analysis
Packs aad Recwaticm 2. SkatePark Equipment
AGENDA ITEM:. G-1; SKATEBOARD PARK PHASE II
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: BETH A. WIELDE, ADMIN. SPECIALIST
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Phase H of the Skateboard Park investigation.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
In the winter of 2000, staff presented an overview of Tier I Skateboard Parks to the Advisory
Parks Commission. The presentation included information about:
• Tier systems of skateboard parks,
• Safety issues,
• Insurance,
• Funding,
• Common components,
• Issues associated with skateboard parks,
• Planning considerations, and
• Case studies.
The Advisory Parks Commission directed staff to commence Phase II of the project, gearing
towards determining the feasibility of a Tier I skateboard park in Eagan. Commissioners
asked that staff focus on site alternatives, potential costs, alternative funding sources, and
public support.
Methodolosy
Site Identification: Using park layout plans from the 1995 Park System Plan, layouts were
examined for potential location Because paved hockey rinks have proven successful when
developing a moveable skateboard park, and their adaptability to multi-seasonal use, first
priority was to look at these parks locations. Park sites were also checked for amenities such
as lighting, trail access, accessibility by alternative transportation modes, and adjacent land
uses.
Costs: Several skate park consulting firms and skate park equipment manufacturers were
asked to provide price sheets. Similar equipment types were grouped together and costs were
compared.
to
Funding alternatives: Internet research has provided several suggestions for funding
alternatives. Staff contacted municipalities with skate parks to see if they implemented any
alternative funding methods.
Public Support: Discussion can be found on page
ANALYSIS
Site Identification
Because of the seasonal use of a skate park facility, staff focused on existing park sites for site
alternatives rather than acquisition of new land. This would decrease cost of the project, and
offer another alternative for park users. Sites for investigation focused primarily on centrally
located sites to serve the maximum amount of residents. Several parks were considered for
further investigation.
After determining the optimal amenities for skate park use (see Attachment 1), three rinks
were identified as potential locations and further investigated as alternatives for skate park
use. However, it does not mean these are the only three sites that can be considered. Site
alternatives are open for discussion. The three rinks are located at Bridle Ridge Park, Goat
Hill Park, and Quarry Park. Site analysis and discussion weighs the geographic attributes of
the site, along with the non-physical considerations such as accessibility and visitor comfort.
The following pages provide an in-depth analysis of the three chosen sites as they pertain to
the possible use as a skate park facility.
~I
City of Eagan Parcel Information
Property Name: Quarry Park, 3340 Coachman Road
(Neighborhood Park)
Parcel Description Lot 9, Block 2723, T27 R 23 S9. Parcel
is a 9.9-acre neighborhood park, fully developed.
Topography and Physical Description Not applicable, rink
is already graded.
Surrounding Land Use Mixed uses- high-density -7-7- X1
residential, small business, and an agricultural parcel to the
east. ~~773.
Surrounding Parks (min.mile radius) Near future Central Park site, but not adjacent.
Surrounding Trails (min. mile radius) Transportation trail along Coachman Road and
near Yankee Doodle Road transportation trail.
Utilities Electric, has rink lighting
Streets and Right-of-Way Accessed from Coachman Road, and less than'/4 mile from
Yankee Doodle Road.
Park System Plan Fully developed park, proposed '/z hard court and possible future
connection to Pilot Knob Park (1995 Park System Plan).
Comprehensive Trail Plan Future trail connection to the Central Park site. Connected to
existing transportation trails.
Maintenance Responsibility After initial installation, routine park maintenance, litter pick-
up, equipment checking and light maintenance.
Discussion:
Quarry Park, a 9.9-acre Neighborhood Park, lies in the SW '/4 of Section 9. It lies close to the
Central Park site, although the two are separated by private property. The park is accessible
off Yankee Doodle Road and Coachman Road, both of which have transportation trails for
bicycle and pedestrian use.
Quarry Park offers a variety of warm season recreation opportunities. The site has soccer,
softball, playground equipment, and a half-basketball court. City recreation programs are
frequently held at this site.
iZ
Pros:
• Proximity to the future Central Park site. Parents could drop off their child, go to the
Community Center for a workout, and pick up their child afterward.
• On site parking provides 22 stalls.
• Shelter building with restrooms already on site.
• The rink lighting is in place for later or cloudy day use.
• Wallboards are already installed, setting distinct boundaries for the skaters.
• Ongoing recreation programs on the site allow for occasional, informal monitoring of
the rink.
• Nearby high-density housing, allowing park users pedestrian access from these
developments.
Cons:
• The rink would need to be paved at an estimated cost of $20,000 to $25,000.
• Most residents will have to drive to the site. Alternative modes of transportation, and
parks users getting to the rink by themselves, may not be feasible from the heaviest
population concentration.
• May require additional maintenance for trash clean up and care of equipment.
• Programming plans for a street extension on the park's south edge may disrupt the
park, resulting in some change to the par (parking lot) configuration.
13
MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING
EXISTM WOODS
HOCKEY HOCKEY
RM+IK RINK
SOFTBALL FIELD i
W y
F < PARK SHELTER AGRICULTURE
~ g
Z
a ~
U I
OPEN PLAY AREA
K SOCCER FIELD i
PLAY ROUND
1
O M HOUSE
wow"
BUSINEW
&
,.n EAGAM QUARRY PARK NOW
PARK LAYOUT 1994
NOT TO SCALE
City of Eagan Parcel Information
Property Name: Goat Hill Park, 4391 Lexington Avenue
(Special Use Park)
Parcel Description 22.8 acre parcel, T27 R23 S26
Topography and Physical Description Not applicable; area
of interest already graded
Ave
*gtm
Surrounding Land Use Low density residential, and u
adjacent park- Lexington Di$ley Athletic Fields
Surrounding Parks (min. % mile radius) Lexington Diffley
Athletic Fields, Walnut Hill Park - - '
Surrounding Trails (min. % mile radius) Highline Trail, Lexington Avenue transportation
corridor
Utilities Electric
Streets and Right-of-Way Lexington Avenue, Highline Trail
Park System Plan: Proposed trail extension to Lexington-Diffley, recommend concession/
rest room building, permanent bleachers, needs 2°d phase planting (1995 Park System Plan).
Permanent bleachers have since been installed.
Comprehensive Trail Plan There are no proposed additional trails.
Maintenance Responsibility After initial installation, routine park maintenance, litter pick-
up, equipment checking and light maintenance.
Discussion:
Goat Hill Park is adjacent to the Lexington Diffley Athletic Fields in section 26. The Goat
Hill/ Lexington Diffley sites are heavily used for recreational activities, both programmed and
"pick-up." This high level of use indicates residents are willing to travel to the site. The
proximity to a major collector street, and its boulevard trails, allow the park to be accessed by
bicycle and pedestrian methods. The park is connected to the Highline Trail corridor, which
runs through much of south central Eagan.
Goat Hill and its adjacent Lexington Diffley site provide a variety of outdoor recreation
activities. Should skateboarders choose to partake in another activity, there are ballfields and
courts for them to play on. Other nearby land uses are residential.
Its
Pros:
• The rink is already paved. Paving a rink elsewhere would cost the City $20,000-
$25,000.
• Wall boards are already installed, setting distinct boundaries for the skaters.
• Rink is accessible from major roadways, boulevard trails and the Highline Trail
• Rink lighting is already in place.
• Shelter building and restroom already in place
• On-site parking provides 104 stalls.
• 2 paved rinks, one could be used for other activities in warm months
• High level of use means informal but consistent monitoring.
Cons:
• Currently used as an in-line skating/ skate hockey rink in summer months
• Most residents will have to drive to the site
• May require additional maintenance for trash clean up and care of equipment.
• Heavy use of two existing ballfields may create parking space conflict during games.
Iv
f PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-1
BATTMIG CA - ---T- -
ouTLOr
:s O BASSALL FELD t
OUTLOT
JR. BASEBALL D O •
PhAK~' LOT PLANNED -
• . MENT
• PLAY ND -k
` HOCKEY ~ -
EXISTING FOREST.
PARK Sl -8 TER
.
• ~ HOCKEY
.
LEXW-VTON AVEME
GOAT HILL PARK.
ITY 9AUN noRn,
PARK LAYOUT 1994
SCALE r-120-0"
City of Eagan Parcel lnformadon
Property Name: Bridle Ridge Park, 3990 Elrene Road
(Neighborhood Park)
Parcel Description Bridle Ridge 1' Addition, Outlot B, Hills
of Stonebridge Outlot A. 20-acre parcel
Topography and Physical Description Not applicable, area
of interest already graded
Surrounding Land Use Residential, planned development
Surrounding Parks (min. % mile radius) Bridle Ridge -
extensions, Wandering Walk Park
Surrounding Trails (min. mile radius) Elrene Road, Northview Park transportation trails
Utilities Rink lighting in place
Streets and Right-of-Way Elrene Road
Park System Plan Proposed additional trail extensions and connections, Phase II planting
(1995 Park System Plan).
Comprehensive Trail Plan No additions are suggested.
Maintenance Responsibility After initial installation, routine park maintenance, litter pick-
up, equipment checking and light maintenance.
Discussion
Bridle Ridge Park is a meandering 20-acre park that lies in the north half of Section 24. This
is a neighborhood park site, located adjacent to single family residential on all sides. The
main portion of the site spurs off into a southwesterly extension, and Wandering Walk Park to
the northeast. Elrene Road provides the primary transportation access.
Bridle Ridge provides a number of recreation opportunities. It has a softball field, soccer
field, a hard court for basketball, two unpaved hockey rinks, a free skate rink, and a
playground. A shelter building is located by the ice rinks and playground.
Pros:
• On-site parking provides 18 stalls.
• A shelter building is already installed on the site.
• There are existing hockey rinks on the site.
• Rink lighting is in place for later or cloudy day use.
• Wallboards are already installed, setting distinct boundaries for the skaters.
Cons:
• Surrounded by low-density residential housing, which means most participants would
need to drive or be driven to the site.
• Location at the far east of the city may deter some users.
• Rink is not paved, which would add an estimate $20,000- $25,000 to the project.
• May require additional maintenance for trash clean up and care of equipment.
let
SOFTBALL
PLANNED
/ DEVELOPMENT
i
PLANNED
•
DEVELOPMENT / TRAIL 1
.
I 1
SOCCER
I
I
I s
HARD _
I COURT
HOCKEY
. I
NORTHVIEW ROAD PARKING LOT .
I HOCKEY i
SHELTER .
` FREE SKATE
CASTLETON RINK
COURT
PLAYGROUND
i I
BRIDLE RIDGE PARK
1tY PAGAN
! PARK LAYOUT 1994
NOT TO SCALE
Site Considerations
The three alternative sites have existing lights, shelter buildings, and off-street parking. Thus,
these amenities will not need to be factored in to the site cost. All three sites also have
existing hockey sized rinks, eliminating the need to do any grading or major land alterations.
These rinks are already equipped with sideboards, which help prevent "runaway" skateboards
and clearly delineate the skating area.
Rink paving, however, would need to be done at the Quarry Park and Bridle Ridge sites. Goat
Hill Park has two rinks that are already paved, done at an estimated cost of $20,000. Given
the increased price of materials, paving the rinks at the other two sites may increase this cost
to about $22,000 to $25,000. This estimate includes excavation, class V aggregate base, type
41 wear course mixture, top soil borrow (LV), and sodding, highland type lawn. This cost
would be added to the equipment cost.
In summary, staff is recommending the consideration of three site alternatives; Bridle Ridge
Park, Goat Hill Park, and Quarry Park. These three parks have features that could make a
skate park successful, such as proximity to residential areas, access by both road and trail, and
on-site amenities that would make a skate park comfortable to use.
Cost of Ramp Elements
The best way to describe cost for a Tier I skate park would be, "It depends." Numerous
variables need to be addressed, such as how many ramps, what type of ramps, materials the
ramps are constructed of and whether a consultant is contracted. As previously discussed,
cost would also increase if the site needed improvements such as rink paving.
There is also the public factor. As with any public facility, the park should be designed to
meet the needs of potential users. This means that there may be more (or less!) elements
within the park than can be anticipated on paper. For information purposes, rough estimates
have been provided.
Ramps, Rails, and Other Elements
Fundamentally, cross comparisons of ramps and other features should be simple. A 7' grind
rail from one company should be easily compared to a 7' grind rail from another. But then the
questions begin. Should the rail be kinked or straight? Round? Square? Galvanized steel?
Each of these factors can significantly impact the price. Equipment will often have additional
features added to it, such as back rails or box-on-ramp elements. This, too, will significantly
increase the price.
Materials also have great impact on price. Steel ramps increase the price dramatically, but
this needs to be weighed against durability compared to wood ramps.
Shipping costs and set up fees also need to be considered. A low bid on equipment from a
firm in Virginia may end up costing as much as a higher bid from Duluth after shipping and
set-up.
Seven companies from various states were contacted and asked to provide equipment costs.
Since each company's price fluctuates so greatly for each piece of equipment, a
comprehensive list, arranged by similar equipment type, is provided in Attachment 2. Prices
2~
in Figure A are generalized from the comprehensive list for comparative purposes, and do not
include shipping or labor. Steel equipment and ramp kits have been given their own category,
since they skew the generalized price.
Figure A: Approximate Costs for Skate Park Equipment by Type
Equipment* Low High Steel Ramp '
Kits**
Grind Rail 7' to 8' $100 $200 $550 N/A
9' to 10' 200 250 700-800 N/A
12' 200 400 850 N/A
16' to 20' 275 350 950 N/A
Flat Banks 1,700 2,020 2,600 to 2,800 1,119
Fl Box 2,000 4,000 11,000 505
F Wedge 650 750 N/A 563
Fun Box, w/o features 500 1,500 2,000 520
Hump Ramps 2,000 2,400 3,700 N/A
Launch Ramps 200 575 700 483
Pyramids, 3 & 4 sided 6,000 7,500 7,500 to 9,500 5,988
3' Quarter Pipes, 12' to 18' wide 1,500 4,000 1,500 to 7,700 N/A
Spines 500 3,100 4,000 to 5,500 1,464
* Enhancements to equipment are not figured in to the cost. Cost is projected on base element.
Prices based on "exterior kits" available from Ramptech, Inc.
Costs cannot be specifically determined until equipment is identified, but some rough
generalizations can be made. Should the skate park project develop, the City of Eagan can
anticipate costs for wood elements to range from $15,000 to $25,000 (based on having one
12' grind rail and one each of the remaining equipment pieces) for equipment alone. Steel
elements could cost between $34,000 and $44,000.
Funding
Given the cost of equipment and site improvements, some cities have tried to minimize their
financial burden. The following list details some methods to consider for cost savings or
supplemental funding:
• Park Site Fund. This fund is designed to aid the construction of new parks. A skate
park qualifies for this type of project. The Commission could consider financing a
skate park from the ` undesignated" portion of the fund.
• Private/ public partnerships. Parameters of responsibility and recognition would
need to be established at the outset. Recognition opportunities are somewhat limited
at a Tier I facility, unless banners were hung on the walls or logos were imprinted on
the equipment. Marketing materials may also provide recognition opportunities.
ZL
• Request tax-deductible donations. As with partnerships, donations should be
recognized whenever possible. Creative recognition techniques would be needed in
both cases.
• Local Business Contributions. Businesses or programs donate 5-10% of customer
sales to a non-profit group's project at no cost to the consumer. This type of program
has been implemented in many "Good Neighbor" stores lice Target, who gives a
percentage back to the community.
• Grants. Find a grant opportunity, government or private, which sponsors youth
activities. A list of some such programs can be found in Appendix C. This is
provided for information purposes only, and should not be taken as a comprehensive
listing of all programs available.
• Have the potential users raise funds themselves. This may be perceived as unfair,
since participants in other "pick up" sports (tennis, informal basketball, soccer) are not
required to raise their own funds for the development of courts or fields.
• Arrange fundraising workshops for youth. Invite youth to help raise funds in a
workshop setting. Have it styled as a skill-building session, enhancing fundraising
skills that they may use in other endeavors. However, given the age range and lack of
strong organizational backing of potential users, a fundraising campaign may not
prove successful.
• Trade schools. Contact a trade school or community college whose students are
working with construction, AutoCAD, design, and other aspects of building. Students,
under the guidance of their instructors, can use it for a class project and experience
builder, and the City would get quality work at a reduced price.
• City of Eagan maintenance staff may also be capable of constructing ramps in-
house. This would, however, detract from their regular duties. Although they have
been successful at in-house construction of other park equipment, it is questionable
how fair it would be to assign them this type of project on top of their regular duties.
• Ramp kits are available and could be assembled and maintained by City maintenance
staff. These would have the benefit of a warranty (at least for parts), but would reduce
the cost of outside labor.
Public Support
Several years ago, public interest in a skate park resulted in a partnership involving Eagan and
Burnsville, providing funds for a Tier II skate park in Burnsville. Tier 11 facilities have ramps
over 3' tall, and because of the higher ramps, and require patrons to wear protective gear.
Unlike Tier I facilities, operators of a Tier II facility must carry insurance and often charge
admission to their users to help offset costs. Tier II facilities are geared toward the dedicated
skater.
Z3
Despite the construction of the Tier 11 facility, Parks and Recreation and Administration staff
are still receiving calls and letters inquiring about getting a skateboard park in Eagan. Parks
and Civic Arena staff has reported damage to property from skateboards. It is unclear whether
the patrons don't know about the Tier U facility, or if they cannot get to it for informal "pick-
up" skating, or if they do not care for the formalized type of park.
To determine public support, a large-scale survey of pre-teens and adolescents (the general
age group observed by staff at skate parks) would benefit the project. This type of survey will
require staff to talk to Eagan's adolescents and pre-adolescents. Spring and summer provide
the best opportunity for staff to distribute surveys to potential users, due to the increased
number of recreation programs offered (and thus an increase of program enrollees). Summer
programs begin in mid-June.
ANALYSIS
If work is to continue on this project, Phase three, should be considered as an option. The
alternative is simply to determine that there is sufficient interest in a skate park and proceed
with planning. Effort can then focus on developing a skate park plan that could involve skate
boarders in design elements.
Selection of a site or sites at this stage would be helpful. Although there are possible multiple
sites, staff believes that one of the three sites in this report should be selected. Since
discussion has been on the possibility of portability of the skate park itself, perhaps all three
locations can be used. However, this would require investment in resurfacing existing rinks at
two park locations.
The major issue will be funding. Looking to others to support this type of facility is not
without merit, but it may asking to much of a young user group that is largely unorganized
and without an infrastructure with which to carry out a fund raising campaign. Given probable
costs of about $20,000, this may be an undoubting challenge. It may be that additional
components could be added to the skate park once there is a core group of users. Once
brought together as a group, they might be challenged to organize and seek donations to add
components. This might also be considered.
Staff is seeking direction as to the next phase of this project and in particular, identifying as
site and funding source.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
1. Proceed to Phase III of the skate park investigation, focusing on working with the
public and working with consultants.
2. Do not proceed to Phase III of the investigation.
3. Determine the best possible site alternative:
a. Bridle Ridge Park hockey rink
b. Goat Hill Park hockey rink
c. Quarry Park hockey rink
Za
4. Determine the funding strategy
a. Park Site Fund
b. Private/ public partnership
c. Donations
d. Grants
e. Other
5. Send the alternatives to subcommittee, and report back with their recommendations
6. Other
2.0
Item: &-1 ,r S oAr~
Attachment # 1. S%tf. Av~Alyt is.
Attachment l : Site Analysis
• of Ice ftesuo" Night Paved
Park Location Sheets Size sl Shett Parisi Trails Wng rink Notes
Lies on E side of
NW 1/4 city, far drive for
Bridle Ride Sec 24 2 H S Y Y N N W side
Lies on E side of
SE 1/4 city, far drive for
Camelian Park Sec 20 1 H S Y N N W side
in S part of city,
Clearwater SW 1/4 Y- Pilot along major
Paris Sec 27 1 Open Warming Y Knob Rd Y N collector
Evergreen NE 1/4 Lies on Highline
Paris Sec 28 1 Unknown S N N N N Trail
NW 1/4 Abuts residential
Goat Hill Park Sec 26 2 H S Y Y Y Y development
Isolated in north
part of city,
NE 1/4 would not easily
Pilot Knob Sec 29 1 H N Y Y N N serve south
Near Community
SW 1/4 Center, multiple
Quarry Paris Sec 9 2 H S Y Y Y N family housing
Abuts single
NE 1/4 family housing-
Ridgecliff Paris Sec 32 1 H N Y Y N N very close
Lies on W side
of city, far drive
for E side. Not
NE 1/4 near Community
Sky Hill Paris Sec 17 2 H S Y Y Y N Center.
Very far S and
NW 1/4 W, would not
Slater Acres Sec 31 1 Free N N Y N N serve N and E
Near both single
family and
multiple family
Woodhaven NW 1/4 housing, crosses
Park Sec 20 1 H N Y Y N N 35E
Item: G-1 Sk~~AC+dk~
Attachment #A. SV4Af-S~k
Egv~pcM-~'
Attachment 2:Skate Park Equipment; Price Charts,
Specs 81 Manufacturers
Rails
2' rail steel painted 420 Team Pain
2' rail steel galvanized 499 Team Pain
3' rail steel painted 430 Team Pain
Trail steel galvanized 515 Team Pain
4' rail steel painted 445 Team Pain
4' rail steel galvanized 542 Team Pain
7' flat 7' long, 8' high, 25 lbs 139 Suburban Rails
7' slope 7' long, 8"' to 14" high, 2" round, 28 Ibs 149 Suburban Rails
Frail 12" - 16" H X 2" W X 8'L 169 Ramptech
8' flat 8' long, 9" high, 2.5" round, 2" sq, 3" rec 169 Suburban Rails
8' rail No specs given 160 Big Daddy Rampkits
8' round V X 12" 190 Skateparkramps.com
8' flat 8'X 12" 190 Skateparkramps.com
9' slope 9' long, 9" to 18" high, 2" round, 39 Ibs 194 Suburban Rails
10' single barrel steel 10' long 659 Skateparks International
10' DB barrel rail steel 10' long 759 Skateparks International
10' slider rail steel 10' long 759 Skateparks International
10' round 10'X 12" 230 Skateparkramps.com
10' flat 10'X 12" 240 Skateparkramps.com
12' slope 12' long, 9" to 21" high, 2" round, 50 Ibs 224 Suburban Rails
12' rail 12' long, 1' high. no kink 400 True Ride
12' kink 12' long, 9" to 15" high, 2" round, 48 Ibs 234 Suburban Rails
12' kink steel 12' long 859 Skateparks International
16' arc rail steel 16' long 959 Skateparks International
18' double kink 18' long, 9" to 15" high, 2" round, 74 lbs 274 Suburban Rails
20' kink rail 2'H X 2" W X 20'L 349 Ramptech
20' straight rail 18" H X 4" W X 20'L 289 Ramptech
32' curved happy rail steel 32' long 1,699 Skateparks International
Custom Custom specs 25/ ft Suburban Rails
Launch Ramps
Launch Ramps 32" X 12" 190 Skateparkramps.com
Launch Ramps 32" X 18" 240 Skateparkramps.com
Launch Bank 32" X 12" 190 Skateparkramps.com
Launch Bank 32" X 18" 240 Skateparkramps.com
Launch Ramp 2' X 4', steel 695 Skateparks International
Launch Ramp 2'H X 4'W X 5'L 551 Ramptech
Launch Ramp 2' H X 4' W X 5' L (exterior kit) 415 Ramptech
Banks.
Flat Bank 2'X 8' Steel Painted 1727.42 Team Pain
Flat Bank 2' X 8' Steel Galvanized 1828.84 Team Pain
Flat Bank 3'X 12' Steel Painted 2569.82 Team Pain
Flat Bank TX 12' Steel Galvanized 2823.7 Team Pain
Flat Bank 3' X 8' Steel Painted 1827.42 Team Pain
Flat Bank TX 8' Steel Galvanized 2028.84 Team Pain
Low Bank 3'H X 8'W X 8'L 1570 Ramptech
Low Bank 3'H X 8'W X 8'L (exterior kit) 1119 Ramptech
Quarter Bank TX 18' 4,402 True Ride
Boxes
Fun Box No specs given 425 Big Daddy Rampkits
Fun Box 1'X 4'w/ handrails, steel 1,149 Skateparks International
Fun Box V X 4'X 8'L 631 Ramptech
Fun Box 1.' X 4' X 81 (exterior kit) 505 Ramptech
Fun Box V X 8'w/ handrails, steel 1,879 Skateparks International
Fun Box 1.6'X 14' 6,309 True Ride
Fly Box 2'H X 4'W X 22'L with ledge-ends only 3,172 Ramptech
Fly Box 2'H X 4'W X 22'L with ledge-ends, ext. kit 1,987 Ramptech
Fly Box TX 8'w/ stairs, handrails, steel 11,495 Skateparks International
Fly Box, Ledge-3 sides 2'H X 1 VW X 22'L 3,943 Ramptech
Fly Box, Ledge-3 sides 2'H X 1 VW X 22'L (exterior kit) 2,500 Ramptech
Fly Box, Ledge, all side 2'H X 18'W X 22'L 3,536 Ramptech
Fly Box, Ledge, all side 2'H X 18'W X 22'L (exterior kit) 2,688 Ramptech
Twin Fly Box 2'X 8'w/ 2 handrails, steel 11,495 Skateparks International
Bauer Box Z X 8'. w/ handrails, steel 7,595 Skateparks International
Box V X 8', steel 1,495 Skateparks International
Box 2' X 2', steel, 12' long 3,395 Skateparks International
Low Box 1'H X 4'W X 81 631 Ramptech
Low Box 1'H X 4'W X 8'L (exterior kit) 505 Ramptech
Manual Pad Step 2' X 4', steel, 12' long 6,399 Skateparks International
Wedge
Flat Wedge No specs given 325 Big Daddy Rampkits
Fly wedge No specs given 285 Big Daddy Rampkits
Fly wedge 18"H X 8'W X 7'L 750 Ramptech
Fly wedge 18"H X 8'W X 71 (exterior kit) 563 Ramptech
Wedge TX 6' 1,590 True Ride
Wedge 3'X12' 2,858 True Ride
Kicker ramp 1' X 21" X 39" 109 Ramptech
Spines & Ramps
Street Spine No specs given 540 Big Daddy Rampkits
Street Spine 2'H X 8'W X 10'L 1729 Ramptech
Street Spine 2'H X 8'W X 10'L (exterior kit) 1464 Ramptech
Spine 2'X 4' 520 Skateparkramps.com
Spine 2'X 8' 1060 Skateparkramps.com
Street Spine 3'X 6' 1,634 True Ride
Spine ramp 3' X 8' steel 3,899 Skateparks International
Spine ramp 3'X 12' steel 5,399 Skateparks Intemational
Street Spine TX 12' 3,268 True Ride
Hump ramp 2'X 8' steel 3,799 Skateparks International
Hump Ramp 2' X 10' Steel Painted 2,009 Team Pain
Hump Ramp 2'X 10' Steel Galvanized 2,166 Team Pain
Hump Ramp TX 10' Steel Painted 2,223 Team Pain
Hump Ramp 3' X 10' Steel Galvanized 2,319 Team Pain
Spine incline ramp 2'X 8' steel 6,595 Skateparks International
Sunramps Portables
Wave 2'W X V X 5'4" long 395 Sunramps
Wave 32'W X 1' H X 5'4"L 495 Sunramps
Wave 4'W X V H X 5'4" L 995 Sunramps
Wave 8'W X 1" H X 5'4" L 1,995 Sunramps
Launch Set of two- 4' W X 18" H X 5'4" L 2,095 Sunramps
Launch Set of two- 8'W X 18" H X 5'4"L 3,495 Sunramps
Breaker 4'W X 21 "H X 9'4" L 2,195 Sunramps
Pyramids
3-sided pyramid 18" w/ curb, steel 7,595 Skateparks International
3-sided pyramid 2' high w/ curb, steel 8,159 Skateparks Intemational
3-sided pyramid 3' high w/ curb, steel 8,695 Skateparks International
4-sided pyramid 18" high, steel 8,196 Skateparks International
4-sided pyramid 2' high, steel 8,395 Skateparks International
4-sided pyramid 2'H X 18'W X 22'L 7,275 Ramptech
4-sided pyramid 2'H X1 8'W X 22'L (exterior kit) 5,988 Ramptech
4-sided pyramid 3' high, steel 9,195 Skateparks International
Sidecar Pyramid 1' X 19' 4,349 True Ride
Half pyramid w/ ledge 2'H X 11'W X 22'L 5,086 Ramptech
Half pyramid w/ ledge 2'H X 11' W X 22'L (exterior kit) 4,083 Ramptech
Other
Piano TX 12' 2,981 True Ride
Sidecar V X 12' 3,349 True Ride
Deck 2' X 4' X 8' Steel Painted 860.50 Team Pain
Deck 2'X 4'X 8' Steel Galvanized 863.36 Team Pain
Deck 3' X 4' X 8'. Steel Painted 877.64 Team Pain
Deck TX 4'X 8' Steel Galvanized 894.80 Team Pain
Pipes
2' Quarter Pipe 2'X 8' steel painted 1,292 Team Pain
2' Quarter Pipe 2'X 8' steel galvanized 1,928 Team Pain
3' Quarter pipe TX 6' 1,444 True Ride
3' Quarter pipe TX 8' steel 3,895 Skateparks International
3' Quarter pipe 3' X 8' steel painted 1,304 Team Pain
3' Quarter pipe 3' X 8' steel galvanized 1,968 Team Pain
3' Quarter pipe TX 12' steel 5,995 Skateparks International
3' Quarter pipe TX 12' 2,746 True Ride
3' Quarter pipe TX 16' steel 7,795 Skateparks International
3' Quarter pipe S X 18' 4,136 True Ride
3' Half pipe TX 16'W X 22'L 5,674 Ramptech
3' Half pipe TX 16'X 22'L (exterior kit) 4,733 Ramptech
Ramp Sheeting
4' X 8' sheet 1-49 sheets 155 Rampskin
50 - 99 sheets 150 Rampskin
100+ sheets 145 Rampskin
Number unspecified 95 Skatelite
Number unspecified 145 Skatelite Pro
4'X 10' sheet 1-49 sheets 215 Rampskin
50 - 99 sheets 208 Rampskin
100+ sheets 200 Rampskin
Number unspecified 130 Skatelite
Number unspecified 200 Skatelite Pro
4'X 12' sheet 1-49 sheets 255 Rampskin
50 - 99 sheets 245 Rampskin
100+ sheets 235 Rampskin
Number unspecified 160 Skatelite
Number unspecified 240 Skatelite Pro
4'X 16' sheet 1-49 sheets 310 Rampskin
50 - 99 sheets 299 Rampskin
100+ sheets 288 Rampskin
4'X 20' 1-49 sheets 420 Rampskin
50 - 99 sheets 405 Rampskin
100+ sheets 390 Rampskin
F X 10' Number unspecified 165 Skatelite
Number unspecified 250 Skatelite Pro
V X 12' Number unspecified 200 Skatelite
Number unspecified 300 Skatelite Pro
RS 12 screws 1000 35 Rampskin
Date: April 16, 2001
Agenda Item: G-2; Cedar Pond Best
Management Practices Project
City of Eagan Action X
Parks and Recreation MEMO Information
Attachments X 1. Background from
11/20/00 Commission
meeting
AGENDA ITEM: G-2; CEDAR POND BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROJECT
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
ITEM OVERVIEW: Recommend City Council to 1) accept the Minnesota DNR Aquatic Plant
Restoration Program grant and 2) officially designate the Cedar Pond Best Management Practices (BMP)
Project as a Water Resources Demonstration Project.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
At its November 20, 2000 meeting, the Advisory Parks Commission recommended the City
Council to endorse submission of a grant application to the Minnesota DNR to help support
restoration of a native aquatic plant buffer around Cedar Pond (see Attachment 1). Funds from
this grant would be awarded on a minimum 50/50 cost-share basis and would augment funding
from the Dakota County Wetland Health Evaluation Project (WHEP). The WHEP is supported
by a grant from the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund, as recommended
by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources. The Dakota County Environmental
Education Program is the fiscal agent and the lead administrative agency of the BUT project.
ANALYSIS:
Subsequent to the Commission's recommendation, the Minnesota DNR awarded a $5,000 grant
to the City essentially to purchase the native wetland plants, which will be at a significant
discount. In addition to the DNR grant, at least $20,000 in WHEP funding is being made
available to help implement the BMP project. In-kind support is coming from the Dakota County
Environmental Education Program and City staff, and Minnesota Conservation Corps crews will
be utilized with fieldwork.
• The BMP project entails the following general elements:
I . Fertilizer management
2. Street sweeping
3. Yard waste management
4. Restoring a native buffer, which includes:
• Removing retaining wall around most of the pond
• Grading slopes for planting
• Installing erosion control practices
• Planting and mulching appropriate native species in 3 shoreline zones
• Installing netting for goose control
• Reconstructing trails
1U
Additionally, the BMP project will demonstrate a so-called "rain garden," which is an area that
will use native wetland plants to filter and treat stormwater runoff.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
Cedar Pond is also a high priority site for stormwater improvements because of the 2000 "super
storm." Public information and education about the Cedar Pond BMP Project and the stormwater
improvements engineering design is being closely coordinated with the City Engineering
Department. The BMP project is planned to begin in early June and to be completed by the end
of the summer. WHEP volunteers will evaluate the BMPs in 2001 and 2002.
Engineering consultants of the "EP, who are coordinating the design and implementation, will
attend the meeting and present a conceptual plan of the BMP project.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Recommend City Council to 1) accept the Minnesota DNR Aquatic Plant Restoration Program
grant and 2) officially designate the Cedar Pond Best Management Practices (BMP) Project as
a Water Resources Demonstration Project.
27
_ Item: 6-2 i (.t-)arTo,nA avember 20, 2000
-4; Aquatic Plant Restoration
Attachment # Grant Application
nct.H
City of Eagan
~YISyN I~Jo,! ,ZD A M+s,
Parks and Recreation i •=L. • - .
AGENDA ITEM: G4; AQUATIC PLANT RESTORATION PROGRAM
APPLICATION
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: JIM STORLAND, WATER RESOURCES TECHNICIAN
ITEM OVERLDepartment W: Recommend that the City Council endorse submission of a grant application to
the Minnesota of Natural Resources to support restoration of a native aquatic plant buffer
around Cedar BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Eagan's 1990 Water Quality Management Plan identified the need to protect wetlands, control
erosion and sediment, and establish buffer setbacks. The Advisory Parks Commission's long-term
agenda includes developing a mechanism to establish and protect wetland buffers. The Dakota
County Wetland Health Evaluation Program has provided volunteers to help LGU's obtain
information on wetlands for management purposes. They are also seeking projects to incorporate
appropriate BMP's on wetlands. The Cedar Pond site has very good potential for restoring a native
buffer and implementing an education program, as well as other BMP's.
ANALYSIS:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Aquatic Plant Restoration Grant Program has
funding available for projects in 2001 related to plant restoration in littoral and riparian habitats.
A minimum 50150 cost share of the total grant award is expected by grantees. A minimum grant
amount is $1,000.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Aquatic Plant Restoration (APR) Program Grant
would augment funding from the Dakota County Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP) to
implement the following BMP's
1, fertilizer management
2, street sweeping
3. yard waste management
4. restoring a native buffer
The above BMP's will be implemented in 2001 and evaluated by WHEP volunteers in 2001 and
2002.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMSSION CONSIDERATION:
Recommend City Council to endorse submission to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
a grant application to support restoration of a native aquatic plant buffer around Cedar Pond.
Item: H-1; Erosion and Sodao~ation
Control Policy
FAttach=nts April 17, 2001
City of Eagan X
Parks and Recreation MEMO X 1. Drag Policy
AGENDA ITEM: H-1; EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL POLICY
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
L2) VERVIEW: Recommend City Council to 1) adopt Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy
horize staff to prepare ordinance language to conform to the policy.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
The 2000-2001 work plan of the Eagan Water Resources Division includes proposing programs
to control erosion and protect wetland buffers. At its August 14, 2000 meeting, the Commission
recommended City Council to endorse submission of a grant application to Metropolitan Council
to support development and incorporation into city code ordinances for wetlands protection,
erosion and sediment control, and buffer setbacks. The Gun Club Lake Watershed Management
Organization agreed to provide a cost-share allocation of 10 percent of the total project
expenditures, or up to $1,000. Metropolitan Council approved the project for funding, but did not
fund it due to extenuating circumstances.
Nevertheless, City staff for the past three months has conducted essential comparative research
and drafted a policy for erosion and sedimentation control. Water Resources Special Project
Intern Mike Sowers is commended for his high quality and thorough work. Many City staffs
from various departments have reviewed and provided input as the policy was being drafted The
Eagan E-Team presented the draft policy to builders, contractors, and developers for their review
and comment at the erosion control workshop on March 22.
ANALYSIS:
Essentially, the erosion and sedimentation control policy (Attachment 1) is based on the need for
the City to guide and manage land-disturbing activities in order to preserve and enhance Eagan's
natural resources and to maintain an effective stormwater conveyance system Although current
city code addresses erosion and sedimentation control in various chapters, no formal written
policy exists and there is no consolidated code reference.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
An erosion and sedimentation control policy needs to be approved by City Council. Upon such
an approval, and for effective implementation, city code would need to be revised slightly in
order for it to conform to the consolidated policy.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Recommend City Council to 1) adopt Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy and 2) authorize
staff to prepare ordinance language to conform to the policy.
7.b
Item: N-1, Ceae
CoM►l-tot del: c~
Attachment
CITY OF EAGAN _
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL POLICY
Statement of Need
The City of Eagan continues to urbanize through widespread residential and commercial/industrial
development. During many development construction projects that are underway each year within the City,
much of the existing vegetation is removed and the land is graded. The conversion of natural or. agricultural
land cover to residential or urban land use greatly increases the potential for soil erosion, uncontrolled
runoff, and sedimentation. Sediment from erosion can damage existing property, clog stormwater systems,
fill wetlands, pollute surface waterbodies, alter drainage patterns, impact streets, and foul sidewalks.
Cleaning up sediment can be costly and time-consuming to all parties involved. hnpacts to waterbodies can
be ecologically irreversible.
The City of Eagan recognizes the need for an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy to guide and
manage land-disturbing activities in order to preserve and enhance Eagan's natural resources and to
maintain an effective stormwater conveyance system. The following are the specific goals of this policy:
• Protection of the quality of surface water resources
• Preservation of wildlife habitat
• Reduction of sedimentation in wetlands and waterbodies
• Unrestricted operation of the stormwater system
• Prompt site restoration to reduce the negative environmental effects of construction activities
Legal Basis
The Federal Clean Water Act and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103 provide the foundation for an erosion
and sedimentation control policy in the City of Eagan. City Code refers to erosion control in various
sections, including: Excavations and Fills, § 4.30; Obstructions in Streets, § 7.05; Regulation of Grass,
Weeds, Trees, and Landscaping, § 7.08; Planting and Maintenance of Trees and Grass on Private Property,
§ 10.21; Shoreland Zoning, § 11.21; and Data and Design Standards, § 13.30. According to City Code §
13.30, subd. 13:
The City will enforce environmental protection and erosion control in the development of
subdivisions within the City. This includes off development sites as well as wetland areas.
Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to control and reduce soil erosion and sedimentation within the City of Eagan.
The policy provides standards and specifications for conservation practices that abate and diminish the
problems of soil erosion, uncontrolled runoily and sedimentation caused by land-disturbing activities.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
All construction projects permitted by the City of Eagan which disturb vegetative or non-vegetative
surfaces protecting soils from erosion, require the use of this policy. Permits and activities affected by this
policy include all grading/fill permits, building permits, development applications, and the installation of
utilities.
The City Engineer and/or Building Official may impose special conditions to permits that stipulate erosion
control procedures and may direct the installation of erosion control measures and the cleanup of erosion at
construction sites.
CITY OF EAGAN
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Grading or drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared to conform to City Code § 13.30 and shall
include the following specific information (Certificate of Survey for building permits shall include
additional information as noted
1. Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) contours at 2-foot intervals to meansea level datum, extending
10 feet beyond subject parcel
2. Building footprints (existing and proposed) with pad elevations and unit type*
3. State- and City-reference naming of lakes, ponds, wetlands, and stormwater basins, and other
appropriate information, such as proposed normal water level (NWL) and high water level (HWL)
elevations; ordinary high water (OHW) elevations of public waters; proposed wet and dry storage
volumes; and stormwater drainage areas and boundaries.
4. All stormwater lines, including inlets and outlets at ponds*
5. Locations and specifications of all erosion and sedimentation control techniques, including temporary
and permanent seeding and mulching specifications*
6. Existing trees to remain* (Include this information on a separate sheet for tree preservation plan)
7. Delineated boundaries of all wetlands and location of wetland boundary markers*
Water Quality Requirements:
1. Locate and specify adequate ponding area and volume
2. Include the total area of the site and the total area of proposed impervious cover (rooftops, driveways,
sidewalks, streets, etc.)
3. Indicate all stormwater drainage areas and boundaries of the site
See also separate handout
Wetlands Inventory & Replacement Plan:
There are three levels of submittal requirements that need to be addressed:
Level 1. No wetlands on the site
Level 2. Wetlands on the site, but no impacts are proposed
Level 3. Draining, filling or excavating any wetland area. If wetland impacts are proposed, a
replacement and monitoring plan may need to be submitted for approval by the City and
State and Federal agencies.
See also separate handouts on the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
2
CITY OF EAGAN
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
1. Erosion and sedimentation control measures shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency's Best Management Practices (BMPs) Manual Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas
(revised 3.1.2000), unless otherwise indicated by reference to Eagan Standard Plates. Installation,
maintenance, and removal of all erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be the responsibility
of the developer/contractor.
2. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be in place, functioning, and inspected by the City
once the foundation has been backfilled. If damaged or removed during construction, all erosion and
sedimentation control measures shall be restored., in place, and functioning at the end of each workday.
3. Any additional erosion and sedimentation control measures deemed necessary by the City before,
during, or after grading activities shall be installed at the request of the City.
4. For sites greater than 5.0 acres, as required by MPCA permit requirements, the developer/contractor
shall keep an erosion control inspection log. Inspection shall be made once every 7 days and within 24
hours after every rain event. Inspection records shall be made available to the City within 24 hours of a
request to review such records.
5. Silt fence installation requirements:
a) All silt fences shall be in place and functioning at the end of each workday.
b) In addition to silt fence shown on the approved building permit's Certificate of Survey, silt fence
shall be installed and maintained behind the curb at a maximum distance of 5 feet, once the
foundation has been backfilled. A portion of silt fence may be removed if needed for deliveries, but
shall be reinstalled once the delivery vehicle is gone.
c) Two (2) rolls (or 36" wide) of sod shall be installed alongside the curb after construction of curb
and gutter and after completion of grading alongside curb and gutter.
d) Silt fence shall be installed around all wetlands and across swales leaving property.
e) To the maximum extent practicable, silt fence shall be oriented parallel to contour lines. Where silt
fence is not oriented in this fashion, J-hook checks shall be implemented, especially where the silt
fence is oriented perpendicular to contour lines.
f) At its discretion, the City will review locations of silt fences as grading occurs. The
.
developer/contractor shall adjust silt fence installation and maintenance, as directed by the City
g) All nonfunctional silt fences shall be repaired or replaced within 24 hours when trapped sediment
reaches 1/3 of the aboveground fence height
h) All silt fence materials shall be removed as soon as possible once permanent ground cover is
established.
6. No deviations shall be made from the elevations shown on the approved grading plan, without prior
approval by the City.
3
7. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the potential for site erosion,
including:
a) Phasing of grading, if possible. The developer shall not initiate grading within shorelands or near
waters of the state without prior review and approval by the City.
b) Leaving an undisturbed, vegetated buffer between waters of the state and any grading activities.
c) Grading all slopes such that finished tracking marks from heavy equipment are parallel to contour
lines.
d) Finishing and stabilizing all slopes adjacent to wetlands, drainageways, and any waters of the state
as soon as possible.
e) Installing erosion and sedimentation control measures to prevent sediment from being transported
onto adjacent properties. Any damage to adjacent properties shall be corrected and restored as soon
as permission is granted from the appropriate property owner(s).
8. Infiltration ponds shall be protected during construction either by diverting runoff away from them or
by not completing excavation of these areas until the surrounding terrain is stabilized.
9. When temporary sediment basins have lost %2 of their storage volume, the basin shall be drained (refer
to #10 below) and the sediment shall be removed. All sediment basins, including temporary ponds,
shall have a controlled and stabilized overflow structure.
10. A plan shall be developed for managing ponded water on the construction site. Excess water shall be
removed in a way that does not pollute nearby wetlands and lakes. The following provisions shall be
implemented, as appropriate:
a) Water pumped from a depressional area shall be discharged to a sediment pond or shall be filtered
prior to discharge to a wetland, waterbody, or the City stormwater system.
b) Trenches cut to convey water from a ponded area shall lead to a sediment pond or other
depressional area away from current grading activities.
c) Silt fence shall not be used to withstand the force exerted by channelized flow.
d) Energy dissipation devices shall be installed where trenches and pump hoses discharge to areas
with exposed soils. Where pump hoses discharge to stable, vegetated areas, such devices may not
be necessary.
' e) Discharge of fill (including sedimentation water) to wetlands is regulated either under the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (by the City of Eagan) or the Public Waters Work Permit
Program (by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Sections 401 and 404 of the
Federal Clean Water Act (by the Corps of Engineers).
11. A rock/gravel driveway entrance pad (refer to Eagan Standard Plate #804) for site access from the
street shall be in place prior to construction activities under all grading/fill permits, building permits,
and development applications. All contractors shall use rock/gravel driveway entrance pads for site
ingress and egress. All rock/gravel driveway entrance pads shall be maintained or replaced if they
become sediment laden.
4
12. Soil tracked from a construction site is the responsibility of the general contractor. The City strongly
recommends general contractors to direct their subcontractors and delivery operators to clean up any
debris in the street caused by their activities.
13. The developer/contractor, or a designated agent shall remove dirt/debris deposited onto a public street,
or a private street with a public storm sewer, prior to the end of the workday.
14. In the judgment of City staff a mobile street sweeper shall be required at the expense of the general
contractor/permit holder if the integrity of the City's stormwater system or public streets is
compromised by construction activities.
15. All areas disturbed by grading, excavation, and backfilling operations shall be restored in accordance
with the restoration portion of the grading plan. In accordance with the NPDES General Stormwater
Permit, all exposed soil areas within 100 feet of a water of the state or any stormwater conveyance
system, which is connected to a water of the state, shall be stabilized within 7 days (greater than 3:1
slopes), 14 days (10:1 to 3:1 slopes), or 21 days (less than 10:1 slopes).
16. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded/mulched,
or all necessary erosion control devices shall be properly established and functioning.
17. City staff will be checking erosion and sedimentation control measures frequently throughout building
construction or site development. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be
continuously maintained until such time that permanent vegetation or turf is established. Depending
upon the level of cooperation by the developer/contractor, the following actions will be taken for non-
compliance:
a) A verbal and/or written correction notice will be issued, followed by a phone call to the
developer/contractor to insure notification was received.
b) If corrections are not in compliance within 48 hours of notification, the City may take the following
steps:
■ Refusal of building inspections
■ Issuance of stop work order
18. The failure of the developer/contractor to comply with the erosion control plan or the supplementary
instructions of the City, or its designated agent, shall cause the City to take such actions it deems
appropriate to control erosion.
a) Except in cases of emergency, the City will notify the developer/contractor three (3) days in
advance of any proposed action.
b) The developer/contractor shall reimburse the City for all related costs incurred for such work within
ten (10) days of notice by City of the actual costs paid by the City.
c) The City may draw on the Financial Guaranty of the development to pay all related costs.
I:\msowers\misc\eagan erosionj)olicy
Rev. 4.4.2001
5
Date: 4-16-01
Agenda item: J-3; Preschool Program Update
Aetioa
Informatloa
b=rk~s,aad f Eagan Atbehmeab x Program bookld (enclosed
Recreation MEMO with pact*
AGENDA ITEM: J-3; PRESCHOOL PROGRAM UPDATE.
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: PAULA NOWARIAK, RECREATION SUPERVISOR
HOLLY CHAMPLIN, PRESCHOOL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR
EffEM SCRIPTION:
o is intended to inform the Commission about the Preschool Program. No action is
BACKGROUND/HI STORY:
The Preschool Program originally began as a summer program offering for four weeks in July of
1978 at a cost of $3.50 per child. The class was called Tiny Tots and met from 10:00-11:30 a.m.
twice a week for four weeks. Two sections were offered. There were 37 children ages 3-5 that
participated. According to an article in the local paper dated July 27, 1978, "The 37 children,
three to five years of age, who are participating in the Eagan Tiny Tots program have found the
activities to be a lot of fun. Coloring, cutting and pasting skills are being learned, and safe use of
the playground is being taught. Other recent activities have included the Hokey Pokey, story
time, Duck Duck Grey Duck, feathered birds, and cupcake liner smiling faces. The Tiny Tots
program is held in the Rahn Park Building from 10 to 11:30a.m. Registration is through the
Eagan Park and Recreation Department, 454-7802."
The program continued on in the fall of 1978 with one location and one teacher. During the first
several years it was located at Rahn Park. In 1984, the Community Room of the old Fire
Administration Building was added as an additional site. In the fall of 1986, there were 4
sections offered with 58 participants and one teacher. When Goat Dill Park was built in 1987,
the program moved from the Community Room to Goat Hill Park. With the addition of Bridle
Ridge Park, the program was again expanded.
Last year, there were over 1000 participants registered in preschool programs. Currently, there
are 15 sections of preschool offerings with seven different class names. There are 201
participants enrolled in the Spring session. Goat Hill Park is used from 8:004:00 Monday-
Friday and Bridle Ridge is used at about 75% capacity. Rahn Park and Sky EM Park are used
two days per week for the parent/child programs.
PHILOSOPHY
Eagan Parks and Recreation Preschool programs focus on the social development of children,
which is the foundation for lifelong learning. Preschool programs are developed for children ages
2-5, who have not yet attended kindergarten. Classes are offered every 3 months- September,
January, March and June are the start months.
2ek
Teachers are qualified individuals with teaching experience in early childhood education. One
teacher and a teaching assistant are always on site during instructional classes. The program
currently has 3 teachers and 5 teacher's assistants.
Many classes have multiple age groups, which we have found to be an important component of
the preschool experience. Three, four and five year olds are taught together in the same class.
What staff has observed is that the younger children learn how to socialize from the older
children by interacting with each other. The older children benefit by showing by example how
to play and socialize together.
FUNDING
The program is funded through user fees. Class fees cover instruction and supplies. Fees are as
follows: (based on a 10 week session)
Class Fee Length Frequency
• Open Play Time $30.00 2 hours 1 day/week
• Mornings Out $30.00 2 hours 1 day/week
• Me Two $35.00 1.25 hours 1 day/week
• Friday Friends $65.00 2.5 hours 1 day/week
• Wacky Wednesdays $65.00 2.5 hours 1 day/week
• Tiny Tots $100.00 2 hours 2 days/week
• Just for 5's $165.00 2.5 hours 3 days/week
CLASS OFFERINGS
The Eagan Parks and Recreation programs offer a variety of classes:
• One day a week classes (Wacky Wednesdays and Friday Friends)
• Two days a week classes (Tiny Tots)
• Three days a week for 4 and 5 year old children (Just For 5's)
• Parent and child classes (instructional and non instructional open play time)
Instructional classes for 3,4, and 5 year olds are offered at Bridle Ridge Park and Goat Hill
Park. Bridle Ridge Park is capable of accommodating 16 children to a class and Goat Hill Park
can accommodate 20 children. The toys and set up at these parks are geared towards their unique
preschoolers.
Parent /child instructional classes and open play times are offered at Sky Hill Park and Rahn
Park. The supplies and toys are geared towards the younger preschooler and toddler ages.
WHAT IS A TYPICAL DAY LIKE?
Each class time is comprised of many different activities and segments. As the children arrive at
preschool, they hang up their coat and backpack and join the class at the book area. Group time
begins with an opening song, attendance, calendar and weather. The theme or unit of the week is
introduced and a story and song related to the theme is presented. The daily lesson plans and art
project are explained to the children and they adjourn to Free play-time.
V
During Free play-time children may choose from many different self-du'ected activities. The
self directed activities include sensory table, manipulatives (puzzles, lacing, sorting, etc.),
building with blocks and legos, dramatic play (house, babies, dress-up and workbench) and an
assortment of other toys and books. Children are expected to participate in the daily art activity
some time during their free time.
After Free play-time, the children clean up the play area, wash their hands and have a snack that
is provided by the Parks and Recreation department. The children participate in "sharing time"
once a week where the children sit and listen while their classmates take a turn at show and tell:
Large Motor development is provided each class time. Outdoor play consists of playing on the
playground with balls, jump ropes, hula hoops and sidewalk chalk. This provides the children
with exercise through running, hopping, skipping, jumping, climbing, and swinging. In the event
of inclement weather inside movement activities are planned. Activities may include bean bags,
group games and creative movement.
The Preschool Programs take two field trips a year. This past year the children along with some
parent chaperones visited Sponsel's Apple Orchard in Jordan during September and toured the
Children's Museum in St. Paul during February.
The culmination of the preschool program occurs in May with a Track and Field day and a bike
day. Each participant and their families are invited to a Family Barbecue at Blackhawk Park to
celebrate a successful year.
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
The future for the success of the Preschool Program looks promising. There is still a demand for
programs. Participation levels have remained steady over the past three years and the
demographics in Eagan indicate that the preschool age group will continue to grow.
For growth of the program to occur the following required elements are needed:
• additional facilities on the east end of town
• preschool instructors
• preschool assistants
• equipment & supplies
A new area to develop is the opportunity for large motor skill development (activities that can
occur in a large open space) during the daytime hours. These activities may include open gym
time and sport specific instruction for preschoolers. The Community Center may provide the
opportunity to accommodate these requests and more. Staff will need to continue to monitor
this program and stay current with the trends and needs of the Eagan community.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
■ This report is for informational purposes only.
3~
416-01
J-4; Winter Program Runt
City of Eagan X
FZttaw=ft
Parks and Recreation MEMO AGENDA ITEM: J-4; WINTER PROGRAM REPO
RT
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: CATHY BOLDUC, EVENTS SUPERVISOR
ITEM OVERVIEW: Overview of the 2000/01 winter recreation season.
Winter is never dull in Eagan, and this past winter was no exception. While the outdoor rinks and
tubing hill consume most of the winter, many other activities occurred as well. Preschoolers and
their parents had breakfast with Santa, the City lit the Millennium, kids and adults took outdoor
skating lessons or participated in the introductory hockey program, entertainment went out to
several parks, and a winter festival was held. The following summary briefly describes the
activities and an overall analysis of the past winter.
Outdoor Winter Facilities
Outdoor rinks, along with the tubing hill, are the large demand programs in the winter. In total 36
staff worked at 10 ice sites and the Trapp Farm Park tubing hill. Most sites were open weekday
evenings for five hours, Saturdays and Sundays for five to 10 hours depending on the site, and
full days on the holidays. Seasonal staff complete a daily log sheet three times throughout the
open hours. The log sheets ask workers to report on any maintenance needs, repairs and also
conduct a head count. Attendance estimates in this report are based on the daily log sheets and as
such only include the number of people at the site during the time the head count was made, and
not the -total number of visitors for the day. These counts help in estimating the quantity of action
at the site, but do not identify exact numbers of people visiting throughout the day and season.
Ice Rink Sites
This year the season opened as scheduled on Saturday, December 16, 2000 and sites remained
open until February 28, 2001. Six Class A and four Class B sites were available to the public.
Class A sites generally include one pleasure rink and two hockey finks and are used regularly by
the Eagan Athletic Association (EAA) and adult athletics for hockey and broomball. Clear Waxer
is the only Class A site that has only one large pleasure rink. Class B sites have one pleasure rink
and one hockey rink and are generally not used by EAA or leagues.
Maintenance: Park Maintenance crews began flooding in early December to have the rinks
ready by the I e of that month. The additional paved rink at Goat Hill Park sped up the process,
creating a good ice base earlier. After the ice base was established, ice surfaces were cleaned and
flooded on a daily basis during the week. Class A sites also received a cleaning each weekend.
S7.
Throughout the season, more than 4,000 hours were spent on rink maintenance and more than
1.1 million gallons of water was used on the rinks. Overall, ice conditions were favorable
throughout the season with the help of the weather and Park Maintenance staff.
Attendance: According to the attendance counts recorded on daily log sheets, more than
11,000 visitors were counted at rink sites during the season. Again, estimates only include people
at the ice rinks during the time staff completed head counts. Sky Hill saw the most action, which
may be due in part to the adult leagues and youth hockey programs scheduled there. Clear Water
and Bridle Ridge Parks also had high attendance with more than 2,000 visitors each. The sites
with the lowest attendance included Pilot Knob, Carnelian and Ridgecliff Parks.
Site Specific: Quarry Park's season was cut short due to a couple of unwanted visitors, which
lead to staff concerns. Hopefully this will not be a problem next season as the youth hockey
program and others frequently use the site. Rahn Park, which has had some concerns in the past,
was almost entirely incident-free. Not only does this improve the reputation that has been built
there, but also increases the willingness of staff to work at this site.
Revenue: Hot chocolate was sold at the six Class A sites to generate some revenue as well
as provide a service to visitors and participants. This season the ice rinks brought in $627 in
sales.
Trapp Farm Park Tubing Hill
Trapp Farm Park's season was even longer than the ice rinks. The site opened on December 16,
2000 and remained open until March 11, 2001, offering 12 weeks of tubing for the public.
Maintenance: Park Maintenance staff installs the boundary fencing prior to opening, provides a
container for the tubes as well as acquiring tubes, which are increasingly difficult to find. This
year a gentleman from GCR Truck Tire Centers, Inc. in Minneapolis donated more than three-
dozen tubes for use at the hill. The maintenance staff also moves snow onto the hill as needed
and calls out Dakota County to groom the hill, which was done four times this season. Early in
the season the Streets Department assisted Park Maintenance in gathering snow from the
Lexington Diffiey Athletic Complex parking lot and adding it to the tubing hill for a deeper base
of snow.
Group Use/Attendance: During the 12 week season, 21 groups paid to use the site exclusively
and another 15 groups called to inform the Department that they would be visiting during public
tubing hours. Overall, more than 3,700 people were counted during the season. This number is a
reflection of the head count estimates staff conducted at different times during the day.
Revenue: More than 2,000 cups of hot chocolate were sold at Trapp Farm over the last
season. At $.50 per cup of hot chocolate, Trapp Farm Park alone brought in more than $1,000.
Staff has requested that the site also offer coffee as an alternative to hot chocolate, based on the
many requests throughout the season.
Winter Special Events
The first event of the winter season was Breakfast with Santa, held on December 9, 2000.
Approximately 100 kids and their parents visited McDonald's on Lexington and Diffley for
breakfast and photos with Santa. Families chose to visit between 8:00 am and 9:00 am or 9:00
3~
am and 10:00 am, have a special holiday happy meal, enter a drawing supplied by McDonald's,
play in the play area, and visit with staff and Santa. This program continues to be a success for
everyone involved.
On December 20, Eagan Parks and Recreation teamed up with staff in Administration to offer
Lights of the Millennium and the Neighborhood Lighting Challenge. Unfortunately, this program
was not as successful as all had hoped. One neighborhood entered to be part of the Lighting
Challenge and a very small number of people attended the Lighting ceremony. Those that did
attend enjoyed the voices of the Eagan Men's Chorus, snacks, and cranberry stringing.
The popular summer Evenings in the Park program expanded into winter this past season with a
few twists. The winter version celebrated the community's ice rinks and tubing hill with games,
hot chocolate, prizes and lots of laughter at no charge. Seasonal staff visited three skating rinks
and the tubing hill in January and February for an hour-and-a-half of silly games, ice rink
painting, and group challenges. For the first year, the program was well received and will be
offered in the future. It may be a more popular program if held on Saturdays and possibly at
different sites.
The annual Dog Sled Rides and Family Ice Fishing Clinic was turned into an all-day Ice Festival.
Don't-Break-the-Ice Fest was held on Saturday, January 27 at Blackhawk Park from 12:30 p.m.
to 6:00 p.m. Everyone on the programming staff took part in planning and preparing for the
crafts, SNOLF (snow golf) and snowshoe hikes. Park Maintenance made the candy cane maze
and helped with setup and takedown of the entire event. Most activities were offered at no charge
or a minimal $2 fee. Overall the day was good, but many changes were discussed and
recommended for next year. Some of the improvements to be made include condensing the
length of the program, adding staff for guest assistance, and displaying larger activity signs.
Outdoor Skating Lessons and Rink Rats
Outdoor skating lessons were somewhat of a puzzle from the very start. Determining the history
of the program, the best times and locations to offer the program, and identifying staff for the
lessons were struggling points. Eleven classes were offered between three park locations in the
evenings. Two classes at each site were successful in registrations and began in early January.
Following some staffing changes and poor weather conditions, all classes completed their four
lessons in early February. For next year, staff will consider hiring a Civic Arena Skating School
staff to instruct the lessons, offer fewer classes, and reconsider the sites for each class.
Rink Rats, an introductory hockey program for ages four to eight was held in January and
February. Parks and Recreation was fortunate to have a high school hockey player with great
skills and instruction experience lead the two classes along with an assistant. Thirty-four kids in
all worked hard on the ice and went home each Monday night ready to sleep. The following
week, they all returned wearing their Rink Rats jersey, hockey gear, and smiles stretching from
ear to ear. Parents watched from the edge of the ice with just as much enthusiasm and
complemented the Parks and Recreation Department and the instructional staff for the work put
into the program
2001-2002 Season
Next year efforts will be made to improve several areas of the winter recreation season. Seasonal
staff are key components to the success and positive appearance of the winter recreation season
3y
in Eagan. With that in mind, providing more guidance and hands-on training will be necessary.
Another focus will be on providing more public availability to Class B ice rink sites, which may
include timed lights or additional staffing. Improvements in the daily log forms, staff
communications, and site schedules will be important for the outdoor winter facilities as well.
Park Maintenance will continue to look into resources for acquiring tubes to be used at Trapp
Fajen Park.
The winter version of Evening in the Park will need more publicity and detailed descriptions as
well as an enthusiastic staff person to generate excitement each evening. Also needing more
publicity is the Don't-Break-the-Ice Fest, in addition to shortening the length of program time
and offering more simultaneous activities.
With luck, the Department will be able to bring back the same instructor, or one with similar
characteristics, for the Rink Rats hockey program and possibly coordinate the hours with the ice
skating lessons if a Skating School staff is not available.
Overall the 2000-01 winter season was a success, offering winter activities that touched the
community in excess of 14,000 times. There's no doubt that the winter season will be back again
next year and it's with that in mind that the above program improvements and others are being
planned and prepared to increase the success of the 2001-02 winter season.
Commission Action
For information purposes only.
3s
711em: April, 11*, 2001
Ag]5, Lebanon Hills Master Plan
City s-lzadRecreation MEMO AX 1.&=WVCSumMar
P
AGENDA ITEM: J 5, LEBANON HILLS MASTER PLAN
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: PAUL OLSON SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
ITEM OVERVIEW: Dakota County is accepting public comment regarding the new Lebanon Hills
Master Plan until April 19,2001. Commission members are being provided with an executive summary of
the nlan nrenared by Colmty staff.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Since July of 2000 an independent consultant, working with a 26-member Stake-Holders Task
Force, County staff and the County's Park and Recreation Advisory Committee, developed a
draft Master Plan for Lebanon Hills Regional Park Director Vraa and Superintendent Olson from
the Park and Recreation Department represented the City of Eagan on the task force.
On March 20,2001 the Dakota County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution authorizing
the lease of the draft plan for a 30 day public comment period.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
Each City bordering Lebanon Hills was invited to participate in the process as a member of the
task force. Several meetings were held with the City representatives of the task force to discuss
pertinent issues. Subsequently the City's have not been asked to develop an official response to
the draft plan.
Staff is providing Commission members with a six page executive summary of the plan
developed by County staff and the consultant. Commission members are encouraged to review
the summary and if compelled, to provide your personnel comments to the County.
Comments are being accepted by the County through April 1911,2001
Mail; Dakota County Parks
8700 127" St. East
Hastings MN, 55103
Fax; 651-4374560
E-mail; park~@co.dakota.mn.us
The entire plan can be reviewed at the County website; www.co.dakota.mn.us
or at a Dakota County library.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
No action is required at this time.
Item:
~'x2C. SOu"M. ~aM ¢.~fiS
Attachment # SUMMAil~
Lebanon Hills Regional Park Draft Master Plan Summary
Lebanon Hills Regional Park Vision:
The vision is for the management and development of the park to reflect the simplicity of the outdoor
experience being sought in the context of an ecologically healthy natural. landscape.
Individual and societal values gained through the pursuit of recreation at Lebanon Hills Regional Park will
be enhanced as the visitor is immersed in a varied and ecologically healthy natural landscape. The
master plan provides direction to achieve this vision.
Section 1: Introduction/Planning.Framework (pages 1.1-1.5)
The project focused on the preparation of a comprehensive master plan for Lebanon Hills
Regional Park. The planning process took into consideration the history of the site, setting,
recreational and educational needs of the region, and the natural and cultural resources of the
park itself. The master plan establishes a vision for the park and provides the guidelines for its
ecological management and physical development to appropriately accommodate public use.
The plan is also a tool for public presentations and preparing funding applications.
Although comprehensive, the master plan is still only the first step in the planning, development,
and management of this unique and wonderful resource. It should be viewed as firm enough to
guide park improvements, yet flexible enough to change based on increased knowledge,
experience and changing public needs.
Proiect Organization and Process
The park-planning consultant for the project was Brauer and Associates, Ltd. Jeff Schoenbauer from this
firm acted as a facilitator, soliciting input from the general public, the 26-member Stakeholders Task
Force and the 10-person Technical Team of County staff. The consultant assessed all input, evaluated
alternative solutions and made independent recommendations to the Park and Recreation Advisory
Committee.
Planning followed a step-by-step process that was supported by public participation and allowed for a
series of internal checks and balances to ensure that issues were addressed with due diligence. Inherent
to the process was finding the right balance between human use of the park and its ecological
preservation. The planning process went to great lengths to ensure that the natural qualities of the park
would remain influential in decision-making. Establishing the ecological parameters and protection
strategy was the first step, after which the physical development of the park was considered.
The master plan was developed with the belief that human use of the park, and the individual and
societal enrichment that provides, will lead to increased citizen support for the protection of the parks
resources and values.
Section II: Setting/History/Trends/Cultural Values (pages 2.1-2.16)
This section of the master plan considers the setting for the park, its history, trends affecting its
future, and its cultural values. Considered collectively, these variables played a major role in
shaping the master plan and how the decision made today will affect the park's future 10, 20, or
even 50 years hence.
Section III: Existing Conditions of Ecological Resources (Pages 3.1-3.14)
Lebanon Hills Regional Park displays a very diverse, interesting, and unique natural landscape
character. As a regional park exhibiting an array of landscapes ranging from moraine bills to
lakes and ponds, land stewardship, ecological preservation, and water resources management
are all high on the priority list. This section provides an overview of the ecological resources of
the park and sets the stage for Section IV, which provides a framework for ecological
stewardship.
Conclusion
Although Lebanon Hills Regional Park represents an impressive assemblage of natural
resources, the vast majority of these systems have undergone severe degradation over the past
several decades. A comprehensive restoration and management program is needed if natural
communities, such as oak savanna, prairies, and aquatic resources are to be restored.
Threats to the ecological systems of the park are from internal sources such as erosion from trails and
parking lot storm water runoff and from external development-related causes. The primary external
cause is land development and the subsequent change in hydrologic characteristics and flow rates,
which have compromised the ecological health of the park and exacerbated the propensity for flooding.
Section IV: Ecological Stewardship and Water Resources Management (pages 4.1-4.39)
Ecological stewardship refers to the thoughtful care of the ecological systems to preserve the
natural qualities and character that are fundamental to the park's intrinsic values as a place of
natural beauty and respite from the built environment. For the long-term ecological health of the
park, a well-defined, ongoing stewardship plan will be required. Although Dakota County has
already established some restoration programs, the magnitude of the natural resource restoration
work that is required to preserve the natural qualities that still exist and reintroduce those once
found in the park is profoundly greater than what has occurred in the past. Simply stated, lacking
a long-term commitment to ecological stewardship will undoubtedly result in a continuous decline
in the ecological diversity and vitality of the park.
The philosophical basis of the plan is heavily reliant on the implementation of restoration and
management programs. The goal is to reverse the current downward trend in the quality of the park's
natural resources and achieve a sustainable landscape quality that can be perpetuated.
Ecological Stewardship Program Overview
The plan defines this Program, including the following three primary phases:
• Testing and Education Phase - broadens understanding
• Remedial Phase - involves major restoration
• Maintenance Phase - long-term management tasks
Water Resources Management Plan Overview
(CWRMP) dated May of 2000 was reviewed to ensure that it was in alignment with the vision for the
park that emerged from the master planning process. Key aspects of that vision that relate to water
resource management include the desire to:
- Retum the park's wetlands, ponds, and lakes to a more natural hydrologic state.
- Enhance water quality within the park's water bodies.
- Restore native vegetation in both upland and aquatic systems.
- Manage stormwater to reduce the propensity for unnatural fluctuations in water levels and
flooding within and downstream of the park.
The master plan recommends the investigation of off-site stormwater management opportunities as a
more ecologically appropriate solution.
Conclusions
Implementation of the Ecological Stewardship Program and Water Resources Management Plan
is fundamentally important to preserving this valuable and unique natural resource. Although
human use issues will continue to be of interest to citizens of the region, these pale in comparison
to the important decisions that need to be made to preserve the natural systems in this park for
future generations to enjoy. Lacking a strong commitment to reverse the current ecological
trends facing the park, its longterm prospects are much more suspect. Today is indeed the time
to take action and begin the slow, but all-important, process of long-term stewardship of these
wonderful resources.
Section V: Development Master Plan (pages 5.1-5.61)
The Development Master Plan is a direct outgrowth of an extensive public participation process
that considered all facets of the park's future use. As defined in Section 1, preparation of this plan
was the last step in the planning process to ensure that the ecological underpinning of the park
and major land use zones were evaluated prior to considering specific development initiatives.
Whereas ecological stewardship was considered in the previous sections, this section considers
the major land use zones and the development program for the park.
Development Program
This Program defines the uses of the park and facilities to support these uses. Showing development
restraint while serving the needs of the public was a key underpinning for the master plan. Public
sentiment was clearly focused on minimizing the built footprint to the degree possible. The Program
finds a responsible balance between providing facilities without compromising natural qualities. Major
components are the following:
• Trails
Nature Trails: Most extensive of the trails and offer an intimate character.
Connector Trails: Link major development areas and allow a higher degree of accessibility.
Equestrian Trails: A realigned trail system is retained.
Mountain Bike Trails: A phased approach to enhance opportunities, improve safety and reduce
ecological impact.
• Trailheads
Five existing (but redeveloped) and one new trailhead are proposed. This dispersed approach
spreads use across a greater percentage of the park and reduces the size of any one trailhead.
• Visitor Center
Schulze Lake vicinity was selected as the most appropriate location. The area represents a
reasonable balance between providing needed facilities and avoiding a new development area.
The Visitor Center will focus on immersing the visitor in an educational experience and be
designed for multiple, year-round use and services to park visitors.
• Schulze Swimming Beach
The master plan proposes to phase out the existing beach house and construct a new one at a
more central location.
• Schulze Entrance Road and Parking
The existing road, which occupies an ecologically sensitive area, poses significant hydrologic
concerns that warrant evaluation and appropriate action. If the need to relocate the entrance
road is confirmed, the preferred location is east of McDonough Lake. Both the Visitor Center and
potential road relocation offer opportunities to improve the existing parking lot to better suit the
need and be more in keeping with a park setting.
• Holland Lake Use Area
The Master plan concurs with the planned expansion of the parking lot and construction of an
access road as part of the Cliff Road improvement project.
• Campground Use Area
All aspects of the previous concept plan were reviewed. Recommended-recommended changes
are to naturalize the original portion, construct a smaller contact station, and construct primitive
sites only at a location between the existing loops.
• Camp Sacajawea Use Area:
The vision is a comprehensive outdoor and environmental education-based immersion
experience in a secure setting and facilities that offer flexibility to accommodate various users and
programs with natural and cultural focus. Providing expanded opportunities that are compatible
with the existing youth-oriented focus will be sought.
Camp Sacajawea Lodge and Camper Cabins: Improvements to the functionality of the Lodge
and the construction of simple cabins are proposed.
• Maintenance Facility
The master plan calls for the relocation of the existing facility from a prime ecological area to a
more efficient location.
• Land Acquisition
No lands outside the current park boundary are proposed for acquisition. In regard to in-holdings,
acquisition when opportunity arises is recommended, with certain parcels identified as priorities.
• County-Owned House Rentals
The master plan calls for rentals to be phased out in the shortest acceptable timeframe.
Section VI: Implementation, Operations, and Management Plan (pages 6.1-6.24)
The implementation of the master plan for Lebanon Hills Regional Park will require significant
initial and long-term capital investments for ecological stewardship, physical development,
operations, maintenance, and programming. In all likelihood, implementation will occur over a
number of years as funding and resources become available and plans become refined and
ready for implementation.
Implementation Programs and Estimated Costs
Ecological Stewardship Program.
Remedial Work: $3,475,000 - $7,350,000
Annual Maintenance: $ 203,750 - $ 281,250
Water Resource Management: $ 800,000 - $2,000,000 (costs are
difficult to ascertain give the variables)
Development Program Cost Projections
Trails/amenities/canoe course $2,380,000
Trailheads $ 505,000
Schulze Use Area (includes visitor center, road, parking lot)$2,450,000
Holland Use Area $ 145,000
Schulze Beach (new beach building, misc.) $ 390,000
Campground (contact station, misc.) $ 460,000
Camp Sacajawea (expansion of lodge, cabins, and misc.) $ 950,000
Maintenance Facility (new and removal of existing, misc.) $2,900,000
Signage (complete makeover) $ 140,000
Misc. site amenities (e.g.,demolition of rental houses) $ 350,000
Construction contingency (15%). professional fees $3.441.075
Total Development Program Cost Estimate $14,111,075
Implementation Categories
The Implementation Plan has four categories that reflect major implementation challenges for the park:
• Ecological Stewardship Program: Developing and implementing program is a top priority, with
emphasis on developing perpetual funding source for long-term commitments.
• Water Resource Management Program: Priority is to align with the vision of an ecologically-
based approach, followed by aggressive implementation.
• Development Program: Traditional strategy, with the following priorities:
1. Projects currently funded or in the CIP
2. Projects which offer high recreation value, protect safety, and/or curtail ecological
degradation
3. Redevelopment of antiquated or substandard high use facilities
4. Projects that accommodate demand for new and enhanced recreational opportunities.
5. Other Projects.
• Acquisition Program: Predominate anticipated strategy is to purchase from willing sellers.
Implementation Priorities
The implementation plan is a reflection of the vision for the park and establishes an overall strategy and
set of priorities. By committing to balanced implementation of the master plan, the cultural and
ecological values of the park will grow on par with each other. However, the plan is flexible to react to
conditions that may present themselves.
Taking a balanced approach to implementation was found to offer the highest potential for realizing the
park vision. As decisions are made regarding implementation and funding strategies, all four
implementation categories will be of equal priority. This balanced approach also allows priorities within
each category to be pursued simultaneously to take advantage of funding opportunities that may arise.
Furthermore, this approach allows greater flexibility in developing effective implementation sequences
that link the four categories together whenever it is advantageous to do so.
Policy Related Issues
• Campground Long-Term Stays: Stays should be limited to a maximum of two weeks to
reflect policies more typical of regional park campgrounds.
• Snowmobiling: Eliminating the use of snowmobiles was supported and is recommended to
cease after this winter season.
• Commercial Use of Horse Trails: Long-term commercial use is not advocated due to
ecological concerns related to existing commercial use. The existing commercial use by one
provider is expected to cease within the next 10 years. The master plan recommends that the
County work with this provider to resolve maintenance issues caused by this use. Developing
a policy for the occasional commercial use is recommended.
• Off-Leash Pet Areas: One of the emerging trends is the demand for designated of_f-leash pet
exercise areas and off-leash trails in parks. The master plan recommends further
investigation of this issue in concert with local municipalities in which options are developed
and considered to help determine if Lebanon Hills or some other park(s) are suitable locations
for this use. The master plan allows some flexibility on how this issue will ultimately be
addressed.
Public Involvement In Implementing the Master Plan
The master plan commits to continuing public involvement in its implementation. The degree to which
this will occur will vary depending on what aspect of the plan is being implemented. For larger scale
projects such as the Visitor Center, public involvement in the actual design process for the facility will be
fairly extensive and involve representation from key stakeholders. For smaller scale projects, such as
trail realignment for erosion purposes, notifications of interested parties or advocates would be a more
appropriate approach. The objectives associated with involving citizens in the implementation process
include:
• Determining who the stakeholders are and their interest in a particular development initiative.
• Understanding stakeholders needs and unique perspectives.
• Identifying and understanding concerns and problems.
• Developing alternatives and finding appropriate solutions with input from stakeholders.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee advises the County Board on development initiatives.
Master Plan Revisions and Updates
There may be justification for revisions and updates to the master plan in response to new information,
trends, and general demands. If a review was found to be warranted, the master plan indicates that
Dakota County would undertake an appropriate public process. Trigger points that could prompt review
are:
• Requests, after determining that adequate justification exists
• Recreational trend information uncovers a need
• Changed circumstances pertaining to existing uses
• Existing facilities are proven inadequate
Maintenance
Accomplishing the maintenance needs of Lebanon Hills is a challenge. It is the largest and most visited
park in the Dakota County system, with challenges such as serious water management problems, highly
erodable soils and surrounding development that create impacts and require a maintenance response. It
is unlikely that existing staff and budget will be sufficient to meet the maintenance needs/priorities
identified by the master plan. For example, the ultimate success of trail rehabilitation and natural
resource management efforts will require stewardship for many years to achieve desired results.
Traditional and non-traditional funding and staffing sources will have to be pursued to meet the
objectives.
Outdoor Education and Proarammina
Public opportunities for natural resource-based recreation and education are of significant importance as
it is a cornerstone of the Parks Department mission.
City of Eagan MEMO
TO: Advisory Park Commission
FROM: Loudi Rivamonte, Youth Development Coordinator
DATE: April 9, 2001
SUBJECT: Somali Community Round Table Discussion
The Youth Development Program and the Storefront Mosaic Group are hosting a community
round table discussion for the Somali community on Saturday, April 21' from 11:00 -1:00 p.m.
at Glacier Elementary School.
Within the last year, the Somali community has been growing in numbers. To date, in the
Wescott neighborhood, there are 30 families living in the neighborhood with approximately 180
children.
The purpose of this discussion is to identify the needs of the Somali community and brainstorm
solutions by connecting resources, combining existing services and creating new partnerships.
Several human service delivery agencies, foundations, businesses and interested community
members have been invited. I would like to extend an invitation to all of you to also attend this
round table discussion and help welcome the Somali community to Eagan.
S7
i
IL
f.
9
r
99
0-199-199
Z 8 19 9 Izz 'URPO
Pg%-ao% 4opvi OQBQ
i
o lootp say
a ._i~ r`r•~, Fyu, r
yyy~ r _
a ua vas
R
_ d y
° L O 1 H
=
10 -C o LO O Q h N N
4- C%j
O N 3 O L O L L 'O .a 4- E N
0 -C 7= 0 %n
E- 4- C
d
cj
= C a } Q L O N S 0 c L1 } N
D E
W off' a~ ode s= L ALL= 0 rA) CA)
eA) L. V) L L to O = Q cn cn C 3 O
O = 0) 'L
O_ } s O N= N d1 Q i- _
4- N L. i- V L C L L TA L N V) N L e-i
O V1 IL O O A O C Z "G 01 U N Q C1 O C
U p) V L n O N Q V .Y s V G} O
3 L 001 N 4--V) U 0 fa Q N L O C ! N I3 •L 'd .p
V) w u o of L %n ` I C s _ c a N C' -o°
a o o L. s c N F°, N a s o L
a s 1- } of 4- v► ai L L. o u C 8 'a LL. Fs-
v' _wU= o a° a> ~ c d H= c
L } N a N vi
In
LU E d N O O_LC d ° Q N W
Is- u w a°i w u to E c L. i 0
Fes- } v =v
E Y °
_ N C 'O O N N Q N Q Q
O E Y
V) E
U} N .3 a
0 -.4 S C C N O L N ~ L L
N c1 3 c1 U L c1 a N O U O C Q L} O O °
O O ci a O L N
i s N oai n" -o -o c c s vi .2 Na a s Ti W a d W°
%n E %n u N o a a 'v s N o~ Q L 3 d u u o c u
t o Y
a } L } O N U 3 U P1 Q t Z N S U U a f- L
E w Q
01 U' d > O N L d1 N C E L O L 3 O %n 3 7 01 O w Q. O
V}
w CS
o. r- w %n -0 S
in -a c
L. V) a f' v it ' .1- w Q1 U V) C "0 ° H } O N = y N a cc M
C; a 4-
0-_ a- vY.~ 'o Z Q N o y NO
:3 CL a
' v L. d os-o
N Q C U 01 N N N -a o= 3 0 d °O cn v N ~ L.
s o v 17
E .a- o N u Y > N ai 'd u v 'C
Ys _C DC a s u
s} d E o w u d
.2 w > r- L 7 N N -0 L r- 0
d t O -p E u w L c d v
a L L 01 Q O N O = > a O Y 'p a V a U v a p-0 H} Q)
:3 W CL 'a %n s I ..-a o ff O c v°i L. Q a L Q. .V) N u o 4-
1- i a'~ ay cs a~dW Yes Ns L vo-0 a `o 0
S a1 O a L fm v N C1 L v V- C
O 'L 'd L N •C > N N C) U
O a a L S L a O
L O .O O S N v O -s 7 3 O U O N > L ui 0 S N N "d w° N
r1i to 0 75
r- 0
• • • N Fa- 3 ° 0 C
u in 1- ~ C
0 obi L U L vi v a °
U u O d d E a U N a a
U a i- N c a c1 > } Q.- 'a r L N N U a
O N L U L L L N O > O . O N 0 Z7
4- N O N O a- w a> 01 } U N S N N -0 L S
7 n- N
s N .2 } E- c V; ~ } vi a V~ } a t ci Vi L
0 V)
o rn 3 o° u} rn L d a°° s
'u- a
s s 4- E 4- L 7 vi -o u u o
S O N Q1 U N N O 01 01 • U d 01 O w L O L.
L.
X a L N L. L. N N N L a 4- a'
O 3 L 3 L 7 U Y V? L U N 7 O CL CL N
O V 0 _0 _x 0 0 w 0 N 01 L a L a L C3 0 0 N L. r-
u N s v
N su, O X o _a o
v CL d s°
LO } U t
O W -L0 6 N 3 :t N L N a}- } a 0 -0 N t
L _ N . -p } u S N- 4- N a 4- N a}
H CL S L CL d N C W +O- L N 4-- CE 1 N w 01 > N O a} N
= o u a Q v> v - oNi . o L+ s u a U C Q o
a. :1= o DC ° W a f°- - a- a, L sZ 4- y} s a a a o_ U s vi
GC s _d a x o u d s s x in
L. L. 4) CL 4-
O pUj E p~ U O N u O O U } y 3 i u E L L L. O
OC Q-4- rA) L. L-
-0 -31 N Ol O a N a v O a o a a
C L.
O tZ o •O d
N N N c 'O a' t 4-
01 L a S L. L. 'j N> L N N L
a> 40-- D V 0- Q j O N a L a a LrA) Z7 a
Y 'O Y y L O> Q a
L
La d ° Lu p o a N 3 N V N a u a o 3 N N u} o
o. u v' N +w• N ci a m d N a d in C ci 'v o i- w
N
O O 'p > 7 S .O lZ L 7 L S S S a a} c O L S U L
a c a o o > N s o rn o > U- F- N u in w a s Q i- a u
a s o d y s u d s L L S u
• •
W} 4- W a- 0 s N M CL } 0
CLASS CANCELLATIONS FOR YOUR CHILDS SAFETY
For class cancellations due to inclement weather, call the . Children must be walked into the building at class
Recreation Happenings Hotline at 651-681-4670. Eagan start time to be welcomed by the teachers.
Parks and Recreation Will cancel classes when School . When class is over, children will be ready to be
District 196 closes or should conditions be deemed dismissed upon their parent's arrival into the building.
unsafe for transporting children. Class cancellations due . Please notify classroom teacher in advance if someone
to inclement weather will not be made up and no refunds other than the parent or chaperone will be picking
will be given. your child up. Please provide the teacher with their
name and telephone number.
WHAT YOU NEED TO BRING Please park vehicles in an appropriate parking stall.
• Eagan Parks and Recreation programs do not allow play
• Bag or backpack for completed projects and papers. guns, weapons or imaginative play involving any violent
• Show and tell "Sharing" item on appropriate day. behavior.
• Dress children in clothes that are appropriate for
active play. The children will use glue, paint and ILLNESS
markers on a daily basis.
• Preschool staff are not allowed to assist children in Please report any communicable diseases to the Parks
toilet procedures. Please dress your children in and Recreation office'at 651-681-4660.
clothing that is easy to pull up and down. To attend class, children should be well enough to
• Dress children in appropriate outerwear for the participate in all class activities held inside and
season. Children will play outside daily. outside. Do not send your child if he/she is exhibiting
• Please label children's belongings to ensure their any of the following symptoms. fever within the past
return. 24 hours, mucous-like drainage from nose, upset
• Please refrain from sending your child to school with stomach, vomiting or diarrhea, pink eye or head lice.
gum.
• Sometimes accidents happen. Please send an extra
pair of pants, socks and underwear to school.
4 5
LATE POLICY 2. If the behavior continues, the child will be given a
time-out. Depending on the behavior, the following
It is important to a child's well being that they are will happen:
picked up on time. If this policy is not followed, these a. The child will be placed away from the group.
actions will be taken.
b. Teachers will keep an eye on the child.
1. First time: A verbal reminder
2. Second time: A late fee of $10.00 will be assessed c. After the 5-minute period has elapsed, the same
for every 10 minutes of tardiness, which will be billed teacher making the initial contact with the child
by the Parks and Recreation office. will ask the child if he is ready to rejoin the group.
3. If lateness becomes a habit, a conference will be d. The teacher will inform the parent of child's
scheduled.
actions, when the parent comes to the site or with
BEHAVIOR POLICY a phone call.
e. If the unacceptable behavior persists, the teacher
Each child is unique and special. Each child is entitled to must file a behavior incident report following
learn and work in a safe environment. Therefore, the instructions completely.
Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for
making reasonable rules and regulations governing
3. If n child refuses to change his behavior during or
participant behavior and conduct, and maintaining proper after the time-out period, the teacher will call the
control and discipline. To ensure this, the Department parent with the details.
has established clear participant behavior expectations
and supported these expectations with appropriate 4. Af ter the parents have been notified, and if the
consequences that are applied consistently. behavior continues, the child will no longer be allowed
In the case of a youth program participant engaging in to continue in the program. The teacher and the
behaviors that are unsafe or disruptive which would Recreation Supervisor will make this decision. The
endanger himself /herself or another participant, or Recreation Supervisor will contact the parents
interfere with successful completion of the program, the regarding this decision.
following procedure will be followed:
5. In the event a child is removed from a program due
1. The child will be given an explanation by the teacher to a behavioral problem, no refunds will be given.
of his/her unacceptable behavior and will be given a
Rev. 09-00
warning that includes further consequences if the 6:Preschool/Preschool Handbook
behavior continues. 7
6
Y
d-C3 U O O L o~dc =
Cf n-
(O 01 O
0
C) co ' t L L '
O > I_ F
O- O .Q ~
N O~~ t ~ N S t ~ o
L v DC N r
CL
Q C h Q } O C~ d ~ 4- a
Q V"
Ira _0 Y N O
S Z a o -p a o o"i }
Z3 S3 vi CL +-9-1
v ° to O o~
to z ° p v
ottq c o o
°
O c o s _0 %0
Q= -Q W v N F- vi P 3 E to w N
Z V 3 'I Q> •a--° o
QQ ~°'s G.o v } } ~ ~
w
O 3~ V d\ O -0 O } L L C3 ° L
H C h
x S N d C O O O O O
C4 V)
CC 4- 0-
01 > N G
:3 a 4- u d Z L rn rn v,
to o ,c OU CL
Q r n. N o) w= I` w in in s V)
e01p DA 'o Q = v}i o c W } N
a • z = oc a Z 2 0- 1- v) Q g 'a o~ 'n d
~ a O s o~ O L L ~
N co .-i N M Z I- V Q V d V GO.
O
0V
cra
0-0
V
O C2 'c ri^
crj O
V
CC
CC d
Al
bm% . (rte
CrA
40
V
Approved April 16, 2001
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF March 19, 2001
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:02 p.m. on March 19, 2001
with the following Commission Members present: John Rudolph, Terry Davis, George Kubik, Joseph Bari,
Dorothy Peterson, Margo Danner, Melvin Williams, David Wright, and Richard Pletcher. Member N. Mark Filipi
was absent Staff present include Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jeff Asfahl, Superintendent of
Recreation; Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent; Eric Macbeth Water Resources Coordinator; Bob Kirmis, Planner,
C.J. Lilly, Parks Planner, and Beth Wielde, Administrative Specialist filling in for Recording Secretary Cherryl
Mesko.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Member George Kubik moved to approve the agenda, Member Joseph Bari seconded, with all in
attendance voting in favor to approve the agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 15, 2001
Joseph Bari noted that the introductory paragraph to the February 15 meeting did not include a listing of
Commission members present. He also noted that on page 1, January 11 meeting minutes, he had abstained from
voting on all issues because he was not present.
Bari also noted that on page 7 of the February minutes, he amended the motion to include th e City
Attorney review and approve the JPA. Dorothy Peterson moved to approve the minutes as amended, Member Tent'
Davis seconded, with all attending members voting to approve.
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors who wished to address the Commission under this agenda item.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS/ SUPERINTENDENT'S UPDATE
Recreation Supervisor Jeff Asfahl discussed happenings in the Recreation Division, including:
4 Departmental participation at the Home and Leisure Show the previous weekend. The event was
held at the Civic Arena and had a good attendance.
4 Field scheduling- the booking rates speak well for the field quality.
4 Recreation staff input for the next "Discover Us" brochure.
4 Seniors have now enjoyed 4 weeks of Wednesday programs. Asfahl encouraged seniors in the
viewing public to participate in this program.
4 Success of the latchkey/ babysitting program
4 Closure of outdoor skating rinks and Trapp Farm sliding hill.
4 Softball registrations are less than last year's numbers, however this may be a result of the
differing weather patterns. This may pick up soon as wanner weather arrives.
4 Demand for golf programs is high.
4 Registrations are being taken for tennis, sand volleyball, and co-rec volleyball.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 2
4 Recreation division is gearing up for concessions opportunities.
4 Registration for spring and summer programs is gearing up.
4 The Department is having some glitches in the on-line registration programs. Urged the public to
please have patience, seeing as how this is a new system and one of the first in the state.
Member Kubik commented on the busy season coming up. David Wright asked what average registration
figures for summer softball teams generally are. Asfahl stated there were approximately 225.
Parks Superintendent Paul Olson passed around an invitation to the upcoming E-Team meeting on March
22. This meeting is designed for contractors, builders, and developers to discuss erosion issues. Other issues Olson
discussed include:
4 Sale of low (less than 3%) phosphorus fertilizer by the Eagan Boosters.
4 The City will be working with the Toro Company again this year.
4 The Lebanon Hills Master Plan will be reviewed shortly by the Dakota County Board, and if it is
approved, it will be out for a 30-day public review session. Copies of the plan will be available at
libraries and on the Dakota County web site.
4 Friends of the Farm met last week to discuss options for the funds allocated by cell tower rentals
at other locations. The group identified upcoming improvement and repair opportunities. They
are also looking at grant funding for future barn repairs.
i; The annual tree sale will be held April 28 at the maintenance facility.
Arbor Day events will be held on May 5.
Member Bari asked what type of trees would be available at the Tree Sale. Olson said that the trees have
typically been maple, bi-color oak, clump birch. Parks Planner CJ Lilly mentioned that Hackberry may be included.
Olson said they should have more information soon.
Member Pletcher asked if this was the first E-Team meeting. Olson stated it was, and that RSVP's were
starting to trickle in. Chair Rudolph asked if it was geared toward towards other city staff or developers/ contractors
or citizens. Olson stated it was geared toward developers and contractors. Member Wright asked if Olson recalled
any trouble noticing some of the earlier meetings. Olson said there was some trouble; a communications gap
between the City and the newspapers. Member Peterson stated that information regarding the tree sale would be
included in the next "DiseeveF Us" "Explore Eagan" brochure.
Member Kubik complimented the tree sale, encouraging staff to "keep it up." Member Peterson inquired if
volunteers were needed for the sale, and Olson stated that they were. Chair Rudolph asked if other communities use
clubs like Boosters to promote low phosphorus fertilizers. Olson stated that he is unaware of any.
PUBLIC HEARING RE DNR GRANT
At 7:30 pm, Superintendent Paul Olson presented some background into the project and some of the
requirements for the grant application. These include:
4 Public Scope and related activities. The grant application covers areas that may not be funded in
Phase One of the Central Park Master Plan. This includes 700 feet of bituminous trail leading
from the front of the building to the bridge area. It also includes 1,000 feet of trail on the east side
of the property.
4 Projected time frame. Olson detailed the anticipated time frame for the park elements.
l; Financing. Olson described the matching funds available from the grant.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 3
Cost to the community. Much of the Phase One cost is covered by the levy referendum passed in
1999. However, there are elements that will not be available for building until later phases.
Associated costs. Olson described some long term costs such as maintenance of the trails.
Chair Rudolph asked about the timeframe for submission and hearing back of the grant. Olson stated it
was due on March 30, although he was going to try to submit it by March 22. He noted that selection will take
some time due to the field investigation done by the DNR. Member Peterson asked how elements of the grant fit in
to the overall priorities of the DNR. Olson noted that the DNR did not delineate specific priorities this time, but the
trails are consistent with the type of projects they will fund. Member Kubik asked if Olson was looking for the
APrC to take any action on this matter. Olson stated that since this is the public hearing, he is looking for comments
from the floor.
Chair Rudolph then called for visitors to be heard on this matter. There were no visitors to be heard.
Member Peterson then moved to close the public hearing, Member Davis seconded, and all attending
Commissioners voted to approve closure of the public hearing. Olson noted that the City Council has already
approved submission of the grant, and approved the APrC to hold this public hearing. Member Kubik moved to
submit the grant, Member Davis seconded, with all attending members voting to affirm Council direction to submit
the grant.
CONSENT AGENDA
BLUE RIDGE 4th ADDITION- CSM PROPERTIES
Member Davis moved to approve the consent agenda. Member Bari seconded, with all attending members
voting to approve.
"Note: Note: The developer has already paid all cash dedications.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
THOMAS WOODS- MANLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
Planner Bob Kirmis provided a detailed background into this preliminary plat. Thomas Woods is a 30-lot
subdivision that lies on 30 acres. The applicant is requesting rezoning from Ag to R-1. The parcel is bordered by
single family lots, and to the east, Lebanon Hills Regional Park.
Kirmis noted the wetlands on the property. He noted that the tree mitigation plan submitted by the
developer was approved by the APC in December. Is it on the City Council agenda for March 20, 2001. Member
Peterson noted that the item has not yet been reviewed by the APrC. Director Ken Vraa noted that Forester Gregg
Hove stated tree mitigation is not an issue in this development. Director Vraa produced the APrC memo pertaining
to this issue. The APrC can proceed with Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth, since wetland issues are
recurring.
Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth provided detail about the drainage areas in the subdivision.
These area are divided into 4 stormwater basins where stormwater is treated on-site. There is also some off-site
runoff, but only about 1 acre worth. The amount of runoff is appropriate for the capabilities of the treatment ponds.
The concern is in proximity to Fitz Lake, which would receive 10 acres of runoff.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 4
Wetland concerns include the two delineated wetlands in the southern portion of the property. There is a
total of 5,841 square feet slated for fill that qualifies for mitigation. The developer proposes to create 6,016 square
feet within the larger southwest wetland. Part of the replacement can be counted as wetland credit. The Public
Value credit would require 7,788 square feet. Overall, 6,016 square feet more than meets the requirements. The
developer has met the wetland requirements.
The developer is also proposing a monitoring plan. The purpose is to make sure the replacement functions
as a wetland. The developer will monitor and submit reports to the City for a minimum of 5 years.
There is a 15-day comment period for this type of development. Normally this occurs before approval, but
this needs to be contingent on any comments before April 2.
Of note is that 1/3 of the site is in the Fitz Lake Shoreland District. Lot size and width restrictions have
been met for this type of district. As a general comment, Macbeth noted erosion control mechanisms would need to
be placed by the developer. He noted that the 1.1 acres that drain off-site are subject to cash dedications.
Parks Superintendent Olson stated that it appears Forester Hove had a tree plan prepared for review in
November, but since the item was pulled from the agenda, the information went to the APC. The tree inventory was
submitted with the application, and showed that there were 398 significant trees on the site. The developer has
proposed to remove 316 trees (79%). Allowable tree removal for this type of development is 40%. Required
mitigation is 197 Category A trees. The developer chose to mitigate 127 trees, using category A trees for the
replacement. The balance of 54 trees will be planted on Oak Bluff, another of the developer's properties. This
method is allowed by the City. Tree mitigation has been met.
Neighborhood trail easement has been slated between lots 8 and 9. This would link this neighborhood and
a bordering one to Lebanon Hills. Dakota County found this connection appropriate. Olson noted that the most
successful trails are the ones paved right away during the initial construction of the development. He also noted that
the City is responsible for signage. The developer has agreed to install 8' bituminous trail.
Paul Olson noted the changes to the action request, which now includes tree preservation, cash trails
dedication, the 8' bituminous trail and its easement, and a cash parks dedication.
Chair Rudolph mentioned how important trail construction before housing construction is, as some
homeowners are `surprised' by the installation of a trail after they have moved in. He notes that it is good to take a
stand on this issue at this time.
Member Kubik stated potential buyers should be notified of the trail to avoid later suprise. Member
Pletcher asked if the trail easement is greater than the actual 8' trail. Olson replied that it is. Member Pletcher then
asked if the trail split lot lines. Olson stated that it does. Member Bari asked if there were any provisions for parks
and trails fees in the recommendation. Olson noted that these were not included in the packet, but will need to be
mentioned in the recommendations for commission consideration.
Member Peterson asked if custom grading was possible to lessen the impact on trees. Olson noted that it
was a difficult site to work with, but the City has worked with the developer on this and there will be some trees
saved. Chair Rudolph inquired about plans for 5-year monitoring of wetlands. Coordinator Macbeth responded this
was provided for in the wetland replacement plans. The City has ultimate authority over monitoring, and the
developer has proposed to include reports photographic evidence. The City will remain in authority for
determination of wetland stability.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 5
Joseph Bari moved the recommendation with the following amendments: include provision for park and
trail dedication, and the tree mitigation plan. "Note: there was no second on this motion because it was
incorporated into the master motion.
Member Kubik asked what the stormwater requirements would be if there were no wetlands on the site.
Macbeth stated that these would be the same, and a Public Value credit would be created. Mitigation requires the
same amount. Kubik asked if that meant this case was a 1:1 replacement value.
Member Peterson noted that Lot 3 on the southern edge is built on fill. She asked what action was
undertaken to keep that dry. Kevin Manley of Manley Land Development responded that compacted fill, when
packed down properly, has less air pockets than normal fill. Manley Brothers noted efforts to work with engineers
on keeping houses dry. It must be good fill.
Member Kubik asked about the pad for lot 4 in regards to the distance from the pond to the wetlands.
Manley stated it was approximately 40 feet. Kubik asked if it was terraced, and Manley replied that it was slab on
grade, with no basement. Macbeth interjected that the scale on the plans was 1 "=50', thus the distance was actually
about 25'. Member Peterson asked how much bounce occurs in the wetlands. Director Vraa and Coordinator
Macbeth stated that it was about a 1' bounce. Chair Rudolph expressed concern with fertilizer runoff. Macbeth
stated that lots 3 and 4 were close to the wetland, and that erosion control will be emphasized. Member Peterson
asked where the off-site drainage would go. Macbeth commented on the minimal runoff the drainage created.
Member Davis inquired whether runoff from driveways went to treatment ponds. And Macbeth said they do. The
Commission noted the tight fit in regard to the wetland setback to the houses. Manley noted that the requirement on
record is 30'.
Member Bari commented that the Parks and Trail Dedication motion is still on the floor, to be included in
the larger motion. Chair Rudolph noted that the tree mitigation plan needs to be included, too. Member Bari noted
that it was in there. Member Kubik restated the motion, To approve revisions of the proposal subject to the
conditions of an 8' trail dedication and trail easement, meeting water quality requirements, a cash dedication of
$1,961 in lieu of ponding, proposed wetland replacement monitoring plans, and create NWA, and public value land
credit as recommended by staff, developer must be responsible for cash parks dedication, cash trail dedication, tree
mitigation plan, and a 30' wetland setback on lot 4.
Member Peterson seconded the motion. Director Vraa noted that the development will be subject to a
comment period. All present members voted to approve recommendation.
OLD BUSINESS
Administrative Specialist Beth Wielde provided an update on progress of Phase II of the Skateboard Park
study. This item is for information purposes only, and requires no action.
NEW BUSINESS
5-YEAR CIP
Superintendent Paul Olson provided background information on CIP funds, and the recent action on the
plan. He noted that the new "fifth" year, 2006, has been added to the plan. He stated that 2002 is now the year of
emphasis at the meeting on March 21.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 6
He described some of the funding and some of the projects anticipated for the upcoming years, using an
exhibit given to the Commission in their packet.. This included ongoing projects and carryovers from 2001, annual
expenditures, 2002 Annual Project Summary, and each year projections through 2006. Olson said that staff is
looking for APrC to recommend 2002-2006 CIP.
Chair Rudolph said he is very comfortable this CIP embraces where the funds are to go. He made a motion
to approve. Member Kubik seconded, with all members voting in favor to approve the 5-year CIP.
Member Davis requested that some of the playground sites be part of the pre-meeting tours. Olson agreed,
and explained the process of pre-meeting park tours to the new Commission members. Member Davis requested
that soccer lighting sites also be included in the tours. Director Vraa agreed.
FISH LAKE WATER QUALITY PROJECT- RECLASSIFICATION OF CITY POND JP-47
Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth gave the background of the Fish Lake alum dosing study. He
described the facility in the chain of waters from Curlee to JP-46 to Fish Lake. He described the process of the
alum and phosphorus mixture that inhibits algae growth. He is at the point where he needs Council
recommendation to proceed.
Alum is added to the stormwater trunk, and spans the three water bodies. Last year, staff increased the
alum dose from level 1 to level 8. The problem, however, is the potential cost to the water body. Level 8 has
proven to be effective, where Level 1 has not. Levels 4 to 8 are needed for operation. While the alum dosing
occurs, sediment is moved into JP-47. Because of its class IV classification, no sediment should be added to this
pond. The plan is to proceed with the effort to remove sediment that was added during the previous year.
Member Davis asked what the wildlife implications were, and the impact on bordering property owners.
Macbeth stated that the neighbors are generally aware of the project, at least those who were around when it started.
But with this new strategy, additional contact efforts will be made. As for the wildlife, it's a tradeoff. At this
point, the primary wildlife is bullhead fish, cattails, and edge water wildlife. Director Vraa stated they didn't have a
specific notification system planed, but staff fully intends to do so.
Macbeth described project awareness by both the PCA and MN DNR. They permit the project annually.
Macbeth noted that JP-47 is not a DNR wetland, but under the WCA, thus under City jurisdiction. The City could
apply banking credits.
Member Peterson asked Macbeth to clarify the recommendation is to change in classification from a 4 to a
6. Macbeth stated that this was the recommendation, because it will be collecting sediment. The student working
with staff will be looking at sand filtration on the easement. It would allow for one clean-out location. This
process, however, needs further study.
Macbeth stated that after the Superstorm in July, JP-47 became a meandering channel. Member Peterson
asked if the disposal of sediment has become a problem. Macbeth did not know for certain if it is a problem, but
sediment does need to be removed from the pond.
Chair Rudolph moved to recommend to the City Council a reclassification from a Type 4 to a Type 6.
Member Bari seconded, with all present members voting to approve.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 7
WATER RESOURCES UPDATE
Macbeth informed the Commission about the status of the Joint Powers Agreement described at the
February APrC meeting. He said it is being reviewed by the City Attorney, and will be brought back to the
Commission at the April meeting. Member Bari noted that the City wanted equal voice in development proposals,
should the agreement go forth.
Macbeth provided exhibits regarding winter lake aeration, which detail the process and two different types
of aerators. Chair Rudolph noted news items about fish kills due to oxygen depletion, and complimented the City in
its efforts to reduce fish kills by winter lake aeration. Member Peterson asked about lake turnover, and Macbeth
said that that occurs more frequently in deeper water bodies. Deeper waters can turn over more rapidly. And it
depends on the fish species in the lake. Member Danner asked how many lakes this is done on, and the size of those
lakes. Macbeth said that they've submitted applications for about a dozen high priority lakes. He noted that around
December and January, the lakes are monitored for dissolved oxygen.
OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN
Director Vraa gave an update on the site plan for phase one of Central Park, and noted that the major
elements have been approved by the City Council. The plan has been split into 4 major components:
4 Roadway, Central Parkway
4 East side of picnic area and the oak forest. He noted the changes to the picnic shelter area since the Task
Force report
4 Marsh/wetland, bandshell, skating pond, building. He noted the drainage methods and bounce on the
skating pond and wetlands. Also noted trails, the facility (which should come in on budget), uses and
views of the wetlands, and parking/ proof of parking.
4 Ellipse and festival area.
Member Davis expressed concern over impervious surface on the site, and asked what methods are being
used to try to reduce this. Director Vraa replied that proof of parking was shown rather than 100% of parking lot
build-up, the creation of stormwater ponds and redirected water paths, and attempts to break up large surface areas
with foliage. Member Davis asked about unique examples of diverting runoff. Vraa replied they are looking at
options during the design and development phase of the process. At this point, they are trying to get in grades.
Chair Rudolph noted how important it is that the public is aware of the concern.
CONVERSION OF TELEPHONES
Superintendent Olson stated how changes in telecommunications capabilities can help realize considerable
cost savings in staff phones. Phones currently used have been seasonal, but with the changeover in management for
the primary phone companies, reconnection costs have become too high, about $3,400. The idea of staff using cell
phones created some logistic problems such as loss and methods of reimbursement. The decision was to go with
bag phones, designs that can be secured to the wall. The savings would be about $2,000 initially, with upgrade
options in the future.
Member Peterson asked if pay phones would still be available for the public. Olson said that the pay
phones are losing revenue; cellular phones are taking away the business. Pay phones run about $70-$75 per month,
and staff is looking in to the cost/ benefit.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 8
MOONSHINE PARK UPDATE
Parks Planner C.J. Lilly presented the property analysis done by the Sabangi Group. They found that the
house conversion is feasible, and could be done within budget. Director Vraa will take this issue before the City
Council. He also gave thanks to the family for their patience and assistance.
Member Peterson inquired about how people will get to the lower level entry from the upper level. Lilly
stated that they would have to exit the building on the upper level and walk outside to the back, where they can
enter the lower level. Interior stairs will be removed; they would not meet code. Member Kubik asked if the lower
level door would be ADA compliant. Lilly said it would. Member Kubik asked if the fireplace was still good, and
Lilly said it was as far as it was known. Member Kubik noted that the house was a good amenity for the park.
ATTORNEY RESPONSE RE DEFINITION OF HARDSHIP
Director Vraa noted the convoluted memo given by the City Attorney's office. Chair Rudolph agreed; and
Member Davis asked what the APrC should do with it. Chair Rudolph said the section states the City can't exceed
State authority. Variances are to only be granted by the Council. Member Kubik stated it was important that
economic considerations do not constitute a hardship. Chair Rudolph said it will be interesting to see what happens
with the Heritage Tree issue.
RECREATION SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE
Superintendent Asfahl told the APrC that the recreation subcommittee met on March 8. He showed an
exhibit of the new concession trailer, and described some of its features. He noted that the trailer schedule was
already busy, with May 5u' softball tournament, July Fourth events, and the plans to operate at Lexington-Diffley to
do some testing of the equipment. He also covered the operational objectives, such as fiscal management and
events scheduling.
Asfahl described some of the teen activities in the Recreation Division, stating that Recreation Supervisor
Paula Nowariak is conducting an ongoing survey of teen opportunities. It is, however, problematic to find the best
possible program. The challenge is to keep up with ever-changing interested, and how to adapt the programs.
Member Peterson asked about hot water and wastewater in the concessions trailer. Asfahl indicated that
there is a water heater and a wastewater tank on the trailer. The holding tank will need to be dumped. Member
Peterson stated Sonya Rippe's work with the Department of Health regarding licensing. Chair Rudolph asked if this
would be done by late April. Asfahl said he hoped so. Member Kubik asked if there was an ice maker aboard, or if
this will have to be brought in. Asfahl said that this issue in an unknown at this point. There is a freezer on the
trailer, but the ice issue is uncertain at this time. Member Kubik asked if there was air conditioning, and if there
were plans to run it on hot days. Asfahl said that staff is advocating this.
Chair Rudolph asked if one of the pre-meeting tours could include the concession trailer. Member Davis
asked if there would be a bag phone used in the trailer, and Asfahl was unsure about this. Member Williams
discussed the possibility of having a written policy for groups and have these guidelines discussed at meetings.
Member Rudolph said that this has been discussed, and is a good point. Member Danner asked if the trailer was
new, and where it was from. Asfahl said it was indeed new, and the dealer is out of Champlin/ Anoka Minnesota.
The trailer is suited to the City's needs, and customized.
Member Bari asked if a state license was needed. Asfahl stated the trailer would need a Health Department
license. Member Danner asked which City vehicle would be used to pull the trailer. Asfahl stated that
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001
Page 9
they have a parks vehicle in mind, one with a hitch. Member Danner further inquired about storage. Asfahl said
that they were working on that. Member Davis asked if the logo would be painted on the side. Asfahl said that it
was intended, and the department is kicking around ideas for that. He acknowledged the efforts of the recreation
subcommittee.
ROUND TABLE
Chair Rudolph mentioned the upstart of summer tours, which is a good way to experience the sites
connected with some of the issues presented. These will start in April at 6:00, prior to the regular APrC meeting.
Member Kubik inquired about the Lone Oak Tree, the original having been removed several years ago.
Asked if that tradition and symbol could be resurrected. Director Vraa said that there was discussion of such a thing
or a similar gateway symbol at the community center site. Member Kubik noted that it is a good symbol to
consider.
Member Davis noted that he would not be attending the April APrC meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Rudolph moved to adjourn, Member Kubik seconded, with all members voting in favor to adjourn at
9:55.
Secretary
Advisory Parks Commission