Loading...
07/16/2001 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission Tour of: AGENDA • Sky Hill Park ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION • Blackhawk Park EAGAN, MINNESOTA • Peridot Path Park Monday, July 16, 2001 Meet at City Hall, upper level 7:00 PM parking lot at 6:00 pm Eagan Municipal Center City Council Chambers A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 pm B. Approval of Agenda 7:02 pm C. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 7:04 pm D. Visitors to be Heard 7:09 pm E. Superintendent's Update and Department Happenings Pages 1-3 7:15 pm F. Consent Agenda 7:25 pm (1) Delta Development Inc. Pages 4-5 (2) YMCA 2nd Addition Pages 6-7 G. Old Business (1) Skateboard Park Pages 8-14 7:30 pm (2) Wetland Health Evaluation Project Update 7:45 pm (3) Wetland Conservation Recommendations Pages 15-16 8:15 pm H New Business (1) Golf Course Study Committee Page 17 8:35 pm 1. Water Resources Update 8:45 pm J. Other Business and Reports (1) Grant Recognition Pages 18-20 9:00 pm (2) Winter Program Options Pages 21-24 9:10 pm K. Round Table 9:20 pm L. Adjournment 9:30 pm The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the event. I fa notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City will attempt to provide the aids. Next Advisory Parks Commission Meeting: August 20, 2001 ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION 2001 MEETING SCHEDULE NAME Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ]an 15 19 16 21 18 16 20 13 15 19 17 21 Joseph Bari x X X X X Margo Danner x X X X X Terry Davis x X 0* X X N. Mark Filipi X 0* X X X George Kubik x X X X X Dorothy Peterson x X X X X Richard Pletcher (alt) X X X 0 X John Rudolph x X X X O* Melvin Williams x X X X X David Wright x X 0 X X X = present 0 = absent 0* = notified staff of absence prior to meeting Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee John Rudolph N. Mark Filipi Joseph Bari Melvin Williams George Kubik Dorothy Peterson David Wright Terry Davis Margo Danner Richard Pletcher UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES 1. Review revenue sources In lieu of park dedication 2. Wetland and Setback Buffers ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION 2001 MEMBERS FNAME AND ADDRESS Release TERM TELEPHONE TERM Phone # START EXPIRES JOSEPH BARI Yes 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 1/2002 3033 Timberwood Trail (3 yr. 1999) Eagan, MN 55121 MARGO DANNER Yes 2001 651/454-5688 (H) 1/2004 2037 Flint Lane Eagan, MN 55122 TERRY DAVIS Yes 1997 651-452-2635 (H) 1/2003 4895 Safari Pass (3 yr. 1997) 651-310-8941 (W) Eagan, MN 55122-2690 (3 yr. 2000) 452-2152 (Home fax) teny.davis@stpaui.com N. MARK FILIPI Yes May, 651-602-1725 (W) 1/2003 836 Overlook Place 1997 mark.iiripi@metc.state.mn.us Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr. 1998) GEORGE KUBIK Yes 1993 651-452-3887 (H) 1/2002 3053 Pine Ridge Drive (3 yr• 1996) 612-713-5315 (W) Eagan, MN 55121 (3 yr. 1999) George_Kubik@maii.fws.gov DOROTHY PETERSON Yes 2000 651-454-6532 (H) 1/2003 4337 Sequoia Drive (3 yr. 2000) Eagan, MN 55122 RICHARD PLETCHER (akemae) Yes 2001 651-687-9177 (H) 1/2004 1074 Northview Park Eagan, MN 55123 JOHN RUDOLPH Yes 1993 651-454-8761 (H) 1/2003 1644 Norwood Court (3 yr. 1998) 952-707-2402 (Fax) Eagan, MN 55122 952-707-2526 (volcemail) I 10/15/00 MELVIN WILLIAMS Yes 2001 651-994-6727 (H) 1/2004 823 Wescott Square Eagan, MN 55123 DAVID WRIGHT Yes 2001 651-687-9336 (H) 1/2004 4671 Parkridge Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Eagan City Staff E-Mail: kvraa@ci.eagan.mn.us cmesko@ci.eagan.mn.us oolson@ci.eagan.mn.us iasfahl@ci.eagan.mn.us shove@ci.eagan.mn.us emacbeth@ci.eagan.mn.us bwieide@cLeagan.mn.us F Phone # 651-681-4661 (Cherryl's # after 4:30 p.m.) MEMO - city of eagan TO: Advisory Parks Commission FROM: Ken Vraa, Parks and Recreation Director DATE: July 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Cover Memo Briefing: July 16, 2001 This month the tour will take participating APrC members to Sky Hill Park, which is under consideration for the skate park site under agenda item G-1, Blackhawk Park, and Peridot Path Park. The tour will begin t 6:00 pm on Monday, July 16, 2001. The July meeting will begin at 7:00 pm in the City Council chambers. Teen volunteers from the skate park projects present have been invited to observe the process of how a project moves through the Commission to be put before the City Council The agenda includes: Item F: Delta Development/ Summit Hill and the YMCA expansion project have been reviewed by sta$ who found the proposals meet parks dedication, water quality, and forestry requirements. Both of these items could be acted upon in one motion. Item G: In Item G-1, Researcher Beth Wielde presents the final findings of the Skate Park project, including site alternatives, funding, insurance, public support, and a preliminary plan for the design of the skate park, which was the result of a volunteer group of community teens. In Item G-2, Water Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth will discuss the status of the Wetland Health Evaluation Project. Macbeth will also discuss item G-3, Wetland Conservation Recommendations, where he will ask the Commission to recommend that Council adopt formal decisions to replace wetlands impacted by development by the Central Park and Central Parkway projects. Item H: Staff will discuss the Council's directive to begin forming a study group to discuss the feasibility of a City golf course. The Council has requested that two members of the APrC be appointed to the Study Committee. Item J: Item J-1 will recognize the accomplishments of Youth Development Coordinator Loudi Rivamonte in securing grants for youth programs. Programs and Events Supervisor Cathy Bolduc will present some options for the winter programs that may increase their cost effectiveness and streamline operational efficiency, while still being fun for Eagan residents. Department Happenings July 16, 2001 RECREATION DIVISION • Evening in the Park is approximately half completed for the year. Thus far, Ronald McDonald, the Eagan Men's Chorus and Women of Note and a teen band have performed in different parks throughout the community. Yet to appear is the Alphabits on July 25, Michael Monroe on August 8 and the Splatter Sisters on August 22. • With a somewhat wet and hot beginning, tennis continues to thrive in Eagan. To date, there have been four weeks of lessons, a South of the River Camp, camps for Stars and Squirts, an Adult Club session, private and semi-private lessons, and the USA Team Tennis program began and continues through the end of the season. Over 400 participants have been touched by the game of tennis so far this summer by one of our six instructors. • The concessions trailer had logos put on both sides at the end of June. This greatly improved the look of the trailer, referred to as "The Dugout". "The Dugout" made its way to the 0 of July event at Central Park on July 3 & 4. Then moved to Northview West for the Girls Fastpitch State Tournament on July 7-8. This made a big impression from the tournament participants and fans that concessions were available on the west side of the park. It also increased the revenue from last year. • Youth Golf Camps continue to be held and have been a huge success. A total of 179 people have registered for these weeklong camps. • Fall Softball and Soccer registrations began July 9 - 20. The Men's Doubleheader Upper League on Monday filled again by Tuesday morning and there are only 2 more openings in the Lower League. • Summer softball is winding down with various league ending over the next 3 weeks. There are 27 teams that have registered to compete in post-season play. • Fall Basketball, Touch Football and Volleyball information was mailed out to teams at the end of June. Registration will be July 30 - August 10. Teams will also have the opportunity to register online at ,A,"ii-.eteamz.com/ea-ganvarksandrec. • The Eaganettes dance program participated in the 4s' of July Parade. 58 dancers enjoyed showing off their routine. This 5 week program comes to an end next week with parent performances. • Instructional t-ball is going well this summer. There are over 80 participants in the daytime sessions and 160 participants in the evening program. The basics of catching, throwing, hitting and running the bases are covered in this program. • Summer in the Park continues to have large participation numbers. To date, there are over 940 children registered for SIP and Wagonful O'Fun. The hot and sunny weather still brings the children out to the parks. The biggest daily attendance was on Wednesday June 27 at Bridle Ridge Park with 102 children in attendance. • The summer recreation staff has done a great job making their parks a fun place for children to attend. They are creative, enthusiastic and obviously enjoy being around the children. • Field trips are also a big hit. 192 participants went to Skateville on June 21 and had a great time skating to the tunes. On June 28, 160 participants ventured to Cascade Bay. It was 94 degrees and humid, so the entire time was spent in the water. On July 12, 275 children are registered to see the new movie "Cats & Dogs " at the Regal Cinema. Field trips end next week with the Summer Blast Carnival at the indoor park at the Eagan Civic arena. To date, over 300 children are registered. • Camps begin the week of July 23. Over 750 children are registered in 27 different sections of camps. • The Youth Development program at Quarry Park is progressing extremely well. Participant numbers at Wescott are still low. Plans for National Night Out on August 7s' are solidifying at both sites. The staff and youth are looking forward to attending the week-long art camp at Caponi Art Park starting on the 16th of July. • Camp offerings at Holz Farm have taken off this summer. Over 100 youth are scheduled to enjoy a variety of activities relative to farm life in the 1940's during the week of July 23-25 and August 13-15. • Planning for Fall program offerings is underway. The next edition of "Discover" will arrive to all Eagan residences in mid August. • The summer youth athletic association activities will conclude during July - early August. Fall programs are gearing up and will begin late August and early September. • Several weekend tournaments have past and more are scheduled to take place later this month and into August. Positive feedback about our facilities and service we provide is routine. i PARKS DIVISION • Significant progress has been made on the Cedar Pond Water Resources Demonstration Project in the past several weeks. After the Minnesota Conservation Corps (MCC) crew removed the wooden retaining wall and scrub vegetation around the pond from early to mid June, City Parks staff installed an information kiosk in the northeast corner of the park, along Garnet Lane. Additionally, Dakota County Transportation Department staff spent about a week grading the site prior to planting. If all goes as planned, MCC and Sentence to Service crews will have planted native wetland vegetation and upland trees by the end of this week. Water Resources Technician Jim Storland is highly commended for his excellent coordination of this project. • Water Resources Division began operating the City's new aquatic plant harvester on Fish Lake last week. This is a regular lake management activity primarily geared toward removing curlyleaf pondweed, which dies back in July, releasing phosphorus back into the water column. This is the first season for the City to conduct its own maintenance harvesting. • The recent hot, dry weather has put a strain on the City water supply system. City staff has been closely monitoring the odd/even watering restrictions and has requested that all commercial accounts discontinue the irrigation of landscaping. The irrigation of athletic sites has been sharply reduced with minimal watering being done only on the turf of programmed fields. All other City irrigation systems have been shut down. It takes two days to complete one watering cycle at the large athletic sites therefore while it may appear that watering is being done every day, no one area is being watered on consecutive days. The reduction in watering will have an impact on the quality of turf and may force a delay in the application of the mid-summer fertilizer. • Forestry staff has been closely monitoring the soil moisture at the site of the Grandfather Oak and irrigating the area as necessary. An irrigation system that can be attached to a tanker truck has been mounted within the tree canopy to allow for misting of the leaves. The tree continues to maintain its health and vigor. • There has been a rash of vandalism in park areas during the past several weeks. Toilet fixtures at four sites have been destroyed with some sort of small explosive, bat or pipe. At Thomas Lake and Trapp Farm only one toilet fixture remains functional necessitating that satellite toilets be brought in until the replacement fixtures arrive from the manufacturer. Staff has been working closely with the Police Dept. and Explorer Scouts in an effort to apprehend the vandals. In an unrelated incident, vandals took a dump truck from a construction site and drove or released it into Bur Oaks Park where it knocked down a tree, smashed a park bench and ended up lodged against a play structure causing significant damage. A concrete waste receptacle was demolished in the effort to remove the truck from the park. Staff has turned a claim against the contractor over to the League of Cities for processing. • The new play equipment for Peridot Path and Cinnamon Ridge Parks has been delivered. Upon completion of the installation at Glacier Hills School, staff will begin the installation of the structure at Cinnamon Ridge. • The installation of the security light system at the Lexington-Diffley fields is nearly complete. The contractor has begun trenching for the light system at Blackhawk Park. Work at Northview will begin within the next several weeks. • Seal coating of the parking lots at Northview Park is complete. The warm dry weather allowed the contractor to work quickly, minimizing the disruption to scheduled programs. Restriping ofthe parking stalls will be done within the next several weeks under another contract. The seal coating should add years to the surface integrity of the parking lots. • The City has been notified by the DNR that its application for grant finds to aid in the installation of trails at Central Park was not selected funding. 187 grant applications were submitted with funding awarded to only 32. The DNR staff indicated that there may be an increase in the amount of funding available and that several potential City projects would merit consideration. • Park staff has completed the construction of a new deck overlooking the valley adjacent to Cascade Bay. The deck, which has room for four picnic tables, is intended for persons waiting for Cascade Bay users, groups who brought lunches or those just wanting a great view of the valley and Cascade Bay! 2 Landscaping around the deck will be completed when there is a break in the hot weather. An additional deck intended to serve the same purpose is being considered for an area east of the Civic Arena. • The proposed modifications to the City storm water system (a result of last summers super storm) will have an impact on several park areas. The retention capacity of ponding areas may be increased, outlets and inlets modified and pipes rerouted. There will not be a significant impact to areas used for programs or activities, or natural areas. In some instances there may be an opportunity to improve an existing condition. All projects include fimding for restoration of the disturbed areas. Park staff will continue to work closely with the engineering staff throughout the process. • An architectural analysis of the restroom area of the Thomas Lake pavilion has been completed. The shifting and cracking of the building and beams is due primarily to the poor and unstable sub-soils. The estimate for stabilization and repairs of the existing structure, which would include large soil screws and beams, is over $70,000. Staff is reviewing the options including complete reconstruction of the restroom portion of the building. The building remains open and useable (except for the vandalized toilets) and is not in danger of failure however it will continue to settle and slowly deteriorate. 3 Date: JULY 10,2001 Agenda Item: F-1, Delta Development, inc./ Summit Hill City of Eagan Action X Parks and Recreation MEMO Information Attachm~ts rX1 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Existing Conditions 4. Preliminary Grading Plan 5. Landscape Plan AGENDA ITEM: F-1, DELTA DEVELOPMENT INC. SUMMIT HILL TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION PAUL OLSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS I ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and wetlands issues that pertain to the proposed Summit Hill townhome development. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: Delta Development is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Summit Hill), a Preliminary Planned Development to create 30 lots for the construction of detached townhomes on approximately 6.6 acres located south of Dicey Road and east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road in the NW '/4 of Section 28. The property currently has land use designation of MD, Medium Density Residential (4-12 units per acre) and a zoning designation of R-1, Single-Family Residential. The proposed subdivision would create 30 lots for the townhomes, and one lot to serve as common property for the development. The proposed Planned Development involves the construction of thirty detached townhome units and has a gross density of 4.5 units per acre. The property is unplatted and vacant and contains slightly varying topography and scattered trees throughout the site. The surrounding area is developed with single-family homes and townhomes. Access to the site is proposed via a private street that connects to Johnny Cake Ridge Road. A stormwater pond is proposed to be constructed along the west edge of the site adjacent to Johnny Cake Ridge Road. This development is responsible for a cash trail dedication, payable at the time of final plat at the rate then in effect. The trail dedication rate in the 2001 fee schedule is $168 per unit. The park dedication requirement for this property has been satisfied previously through a land dedication. PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION: The parcel proposed for development was originally part of the Wilmus Addition. The park dedication'for the entire property was met at the time of the original platting. The dedication consisted of land that was used to develop nearby Downing Park ( associated with Oakridge Elementary School) and a connecting segment of the Highline Trail. There is no additional dedication required at this time. The development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 4 TREE PRESERVATION: Due to the absence of significant trees or woodlands on the site, tree preservation and mitigation requirements are not applicable. WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: This proposed 6.6-acre townhome subdivision is located in the City's B-watershed. Stormwater from a majority of the parcel (6.0 acres) is proposed to drain into a constructed on-site treatment basin and then into the City's stormwater system, through a series of existing treatment basins, and then into Thomas Lake, one of the City's priority waterbodies. The required volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the impervious proportion ofproposed developments (ie., land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and walks). With an impervious proportion of 49 percent, a minimum, wet-pond volume of .67 acre-feet, a maximum depth of 6 feet, and a 10:1 aquatic safety bench from the normal water level would be needed to treat the stormwater generated by 6.0 acres of the development. An outlet skimmer in accordance with City standards would need to be installed. Stormwater from the remaining area of the parcel (0.6 acres) is proposed to drain off-site. Therefore, in accordance with City water quality policies and fee schedules, the development is responsible for a cash dedication for this untreated stormwater, calculated as the cost of the land and pond volume needed to reduce phosphorus export to undeveloped conditions. There are no jurisdictional wetlands associated with this site. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Recommend approval of the proposed development subject to conditions including: • The development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication in an amount consistent with the approved 2001 fee schedule. • The development should be responsible for creating a water quality pond to treat stormwater that runs off of 6.0 acres of the. developed parcel Such a treatment pond should have a minimum, wet-pond volume of .67 acre-feet, a maximum depth of 6 feet, and a 10:1 aquatic safety bench from the normal water level An outlet skimmer in accordance with City standards should be installed. • A cash dedication in lieu of water quality treatment of stormwater from 0.6 acres of the site should be required for this development. The amount of this cash dedication should be $2,994.00. 5 Item: D.~}aD¢,~1.) 'Zrtt, Location Map AttachmentI I. Lola;Or1 M&fk 1-444, , • Q 4 ~ ass ®I w• ®®®I j: ri. r sa ¦ s F Sub ect Site ® e e . IF t fat X-91 am of f En 83 i 41F TIM d a w r i t w• i o g ~ d 1 t QUO t4 Nid @ >FO + m ' ss .r ¦ s • ¦ m at 17 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Summit Hill Application: Rezoning, Preliminary Pb, Preliminary Subdivision Case No.: 28-RZ-08-05-01, 28-PD-02-05-01, and 28-PS-09.06-01 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVNw 3.1, ParoN be" crap data provided N by Dakota County Land Survey D partmant and is current as of June 2001. City of Eagan THIS MAF IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E M I N N E S 0 T A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee We accuracy of this Information and are S conunuany Dsvw-Pnwm Department not responsibia for errors or omissions. Item: ~a~v Tnc Attachment # Z. y pi, _ .~n;>vof 5k L a f 1 - RDAD l 1 I J..1 r 1 M-7 E C ~p !t / I _f 1 $E . E xm t Liu j xm • xm xW ~--r-z_-r~ ~E W±o E a : _ . . _ ~ xm a Woe ••f 9 8 a - 8 - = a 8 xW xW xm Wm xW Was .WmWt wo•m ao•m .fom wr / / / / / ra/•mW 7--j ter`` 7 N%r l ~ I J/n~~ / r~ /7 r--l t~ --LiJI J-• rJ r \ Ifs j-J-/c r )S. ill r4 0 wwC fill 41 n a c j b A a~$ a (1 8 E ce a t a Mig! fill It M., summit HN es r HEDLUND ~ w 'Delta Homes r r 1A• mr r 7102 C.d. 0w P~a} fees M DYI mK Ce/er~ YFnwl. bla ~i (Ar,{., W1(Jp1A gi77 612 ISa-1100 nos: plp gey1W ~ ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT _ Item: Attachment # 3. Rlw ye- ! 1~ , r '1'^ ~;r Q <`•'f.~=1r•~ -1Y~M `.rte -I------^.. `l `I 'S i 11 t_ %J 1 40 1 -''s~iyr f _t' 'J; = 'r = i I~ 1 Fht-T-_a,'J y # ' ter'. / r.l \ / _y~~ 1•, _ ram / Li L 'rl I _ 7- \ • `~b` ; ` Yom. ` / / III I I Fill( ma.-7~ MAW rrbL• (61~ MSM00 G warn ria Yy r : EXISTING CONDITIONS Item: k ° *a Attachment #y - r~~-'\\ S ~~Z,t;'`~ +cr` \ ~i'w --'f~ ~ ' IC ~ ~C`~M . ~bA~Ji~ 21- Ito ~ ~ I ~ ill t = } Y _ ~ 4 \ , \ 6 ° ° •p 77- F.. ar: c/ > 1 1 rl ~i 1 rr~{1 Fs \ ' •s,'r %o e. 4 a~•. 1 fir. \ f c 4 q~q zI # ~ ~ ~lll ~ w ___J _J__-_L----}\_-_L-_ Y~ j°~~ G~¢R q~1Ytlip111D8b¦¦b~1a[ 4-•1V_4. - 4 1 I 1 I \ I ` / i I I 1 I 1 y 1 iS Cl ll L---L-__1__ y r r a BfLI~ s ~s{°pq~' ~~~~IIi5ri 9~Lgi' .~r;g ¢ C Q 2 ~4 bS' t q . 8~ r? t! r 11 a Xq l~ Ea° 21 O lp Ai Summit Hil '4~ :«J a~ ONta Homes ~ ~ (l $ A ~•os 0.•s•s. o..• auaL;00 .«no Wn !%t2O11.~5~ ~~l00 SSI32 n~a•t: to:) .as-uee ....a rn. w. inn PRELIM. GRADING PLAN Item: jat,~sV ~iAC., W"M rf h Attachment # land seapc :PIkaA k i of La b 1 1 n I 1 1 j L~ LJ S ji1 f! ;'Ca I e s j III' III't• gg III ~E k ; , "L VIII. 1~1 k~ i 1i s f r' - '~9 9 t ~y kv0 I : tv tv Co tV a v UPS E€£EEP>< vwj upAp-3g:PE;Rr v'~ I a i N( is f. I fit tkf _ k~tk!€ 1~` lilE¦a:e L} ir O I if .1 R Hill Ili' its 1111f 1}In 111[: fill - JIM Fj {It,11 ;i t 0111 ifin I r~ ~RPI e eeeeeRs eReRR HM ReR th 1-4 t e: t r rrrrrrl rrrri r:rrri rill EEEEE EEEEEEEEE h f I s \ -k C4 n Summit r11!i Detto ome590C 96t tw-.r-.r LANDSCAPE PLAN Date: TULY IQ 2001 ri Agenda Item: F-2, YMCA EXPANSION Action X City of Eagan Information Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary Plat AGENDA ITEM: F-2, YMCA 2nd ADDITION TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION PAUL OLSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS I ITEM OVERVIEW: Review the parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and wetlands issues that pertain to the preliminary and final subdivision for the YMCA 2 d Addition, daycare expansion. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The Southwest Area YMCA is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (YMCA 2ad Addition). The YMCA is planning to construction an expansion of the Day Care Center, which will extend west from the existing building. The YMCA is acquiring 1.05 acres of land from the adjacent 11.77-acre parcel to be added to their existing parcel to accommodate the building expansion. PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION: During the original development of the YMCA, the City negotiated the use of building space in the YMCA in lieu of a cash parks/trails dedication. The space was intended to be used primarily for the development of City run programs targeted at disadvantaged and at risk youth. Since the opening of the YMCA the City has expressed a desire to use space for programs, however the availability has been limited and sporadic. Given the time that has elapsed since the original agreement and a history of minimal availability of space, staff is suggesting that the park/trails dedication be made in the form of a reaffirmation and clarification of the agreement making space available for programmatic use by the City. The reaffirmation agreement would be made in lieu of what would otherwise be a minimal cash park/trails dedication. The reaffirmation will help ensure that City staff has the option of utilizing space at the YMCA for youth programs. TREE PRESERVATION: Due to an absence of significant trees or woodlands on the site, tree preservation and mitigation requirements are not applicable. WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: This proposed subdivision is located in the City's G-watershed, which is adjacent to the City of Inver Grove Heights. Stormwater from the additional impervious surface (0.71 acres) associated with the proposed west, north, and east building additions would drain into GP-7, an existing treatment area located just south of the present YMCA building. When the YMCA 1' Addition C, was created in 1992, the City required GP-7 to be sized to meet future water quality requirements of this site. Therefore, there are no additional water quality requirements to be met. There are no wetlands impacts associated with this development. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Recommend approval of the proposed expansion of the YMCA subject to conditions including: 1) The YMCA reaffirm the agreement by which the City may utilize building space for City sponsored youth programming. 7 Item: c-.Z; \+h u? 214 AMJ `>J Location Map. Attachment # ML INK as. E ? E c+s oar U ® d oa Sub ect Mild as, s r 4 ~ ty aE e.E sea 46, sub r,r ti 6 ip p 1 an ? s ~aa•Pa¦ ; ia.r ~ ® e f s + C • • ti ti o +t tt 1000 0 1000 2000 Fast Development/Developer. YMCA 2nd Addition Application: Preliminary Subdivision Case No.: 13-PS-10-06-01 Map Prepared using ERSI ArtVisw 3.1. Parcel bare mrp daft provld.d N by Dakota County Land Surwy Depatbn.nt and I. current a of June 2001. City of Eagan THIS KM 18 INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E M I N N E S 0 T A Tile City of Eagan and Dakota County do not 5u.ranfN the accuracy of this Information and are S COaImIli air s.v.leprrnrrl D.prtrrent not roaponalble for errors or emissions. Item: V~.Z ; ' r'CA 2"' Aa) Attachment #Z. = ~~anw.Ter 4 n-in .r Al I v` ~I`11wt~•~11vG -I GQ _ Sea-rSo z \ C _ r •ise• .rw>? 64/.72 C ° \ I f-~' I nIC• If} •ewf G~, ld = I ~1 ~I w 111.........lll,,y~' e. • Cy ~ Ji ~ - ivn Isr •owuwr ~ u[ a amor V/ v/-1 \ ` ' .m '~rfrff•[ IOM / •IM 64 ~ 11L70 ~ 71 \ aycas.~':'V . a. sirws+ IeJ EAST to pw \ ~ \ J r 12a02~ f %115 INA ? cm WLN kn v\ - o \ \ ? / gT ' al 4 O t:A egg \ \ ,`c • ~_w':.:1 . _ ,.I y r*, N \ 4 ~I tJ2A69 55 d, N i r_ L Ue v w$LO . F $ o~~ Mili.vieli 0 3 3 3 a o S~ ` o~ Q ?~>4~u v S ~ g = YI I I i ~~a 12 ai AI ~ ~ ~ I a a Ory 10 PRELIMINARY PLAT Date: Jjuly 16, 2001 Agenda Item: G-1; Skate Park Update Action X City of Eagan Information MEMO Attachments X 1. Preliminary Design- Tier I Packs and Recreation Skate Park, overall plan 2. Preliminary design- Layout 3. Budget proposal by EFA, Inc. AGENDA ITEM: G-1; SKATE PARK TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: BETH A. WIELDE, RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROJECTS I ITEM DESCRIPTION: Final phase of the Skate Park investigation, including public support, LMC response to the insurance issue, site alternatives, and a preliminary design for consideration. BACKGROUND In the fall of 2000, staff began investigation into the feasibility of establishing a seasonal skate park at one of the City's existing park sites. Phase One examined the differences between a Tier I and Tier II skate park, injury and risk issues, and approximate costs. Phase II concentrated on potential site analysis, a narrower estimation of cost, and funding alternatives. The Advisory Parks Commission sent the issue into an ad hoc subcommittee who refined the project and determined the direction of the Phase III study. Phase III will be broken down into five parts: 1. Determination of Public Support H. Site Alternatives/ Analysis III. Funding IV. Insurance and Loss Control V. Teen Workshop with Landscape Structures/ EFA 1. Determination of Public Support The most critical part of the skate park issue begs the cliched question, "If you build it, will they come?" In May of 2001, staff polled potential users of the site to determine public support for a Tier I skate facility in Eagan. 330 surveys were distributed to students at Metcalf Junior High, Friendly Hills Middle School, and to kids who had written to the city about skate parks. The return rate was approximately 87.9%. Demographics Respondents tended to be male Eagan residents between the ages of 11 and 15 years old. It is important to note, however, that 34% of the responses came from females, as skateboarding is increasing in popularity for girls. The popularity of in-line skating tends to cross gender lines. Figure 2: Respondents are Figure 1: Number of Eagan Residents Respondents by Age N 40% 60 Y 55- 50- 60% 45 40 Figure 3: Respondent Gender I 5 0 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Female 34% Age of Respondents Male 66% Analysis When respondents were asked, "Where do you skateboard now?" most (37.9%) indicated they primarily used driveways and streets around their home. 9.2% said they used other parks or tennis courts to skate. 69.3% of respondents had been to a skate park, primarily (42.4%) to the Burnsville Tier II or P Lair in Minneapolis. When asked what their favorite park of those parks is, they expressed preference for the street course and the half-pipe (26.4%), the rails, transitions, and boxes (26.4%), and ramps (6.7%). Not every response stated a specific element, however- 14.8% responded that they enjoyed just being able to skate or the general atmosphere ("hanging out with friends," "music," etc.). { Respondent Support Figure 4: Respondents who Skateboard 90% of respondents who or In-Line Skate answered the question, "Do you skateboard or in- line skate" answered yes, N they do (Figure 4). The 10% survey gave a brief description of a Tier I facility, noting that the ramps are no taller than 3' high, then asked if they would use a Tier I in Y Eagan. 88% of 90% respondents said that they would (Figure 5, below). Those who said they would not indicated that they Figure 5: Would Respondents Use a had advanced beyond that level, or that they felt unsafe at Skate Park in Eagan a skate park. N Full results of the survey can be 12"k obtained from the Parks and Recreation department. Contact Beth Wielde at 651/681-4660. Y 88% 1. Site Alternatives/ Analysis A subcommittee of the APrC discussed possible sites to investigate, and decided to focus on Goat Hill Park and Sky Hill Park as possible sites. Staff then determined levels of field use, other possible conflicts, and the pros and cons of each site. Sky Hill Park Sky Hill Park is a 12-acre park that lies near Blue Cross/ Blue Shield in west central Eagan (T27 R23 S 17). Surrounding land uses include office and service property, and low density residential. Summer Field Activity: Sky Hill Park Field schedules as of May 2001 indicated that between May 14, 2001 and August 12, 2001, facilities at Sky Hill Park had been reserved for tennis and softball games: 10 Cumulative Total of Reservations: 19 Tennis Use: 13 reservations Softball Use: 6 reservations Reservation Groups All tennis reservations are listed as Lockheed-Martin. The Knights of Columbus are the only softball reservations at this time. Primary Reservation Times Courts are reserved for tennis at 5:00 every Tuesday during May 14 to August 12. Softball games are scheduled at 7:00 every other Wednesday evening during this time. Discussion Given the distance between the softball field and the rinks, noise from either activity should not conflict. However, parking may become an issue should the skate park be used after 7:00 pm in the summer. Goat Hill Park Summer Field Activity: ,Goat Hill Park Field schedules as of May 2001 indicated that between May 14 and August 12, 2001, Goat Hill Park baseball fields had been regularly reserved for games: Cumulative Total of Reservations: 76, all baseball Other use: Goat Hill Park is the site of preschool programs from 9:00 am to 11:30 am and again at 1:00 pm until 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday. In the summer, there is some roller hockey use. Reservation Groups Seven groups have reserved Goat Hill Park's baseball fields for games. These groups are: • Travel baseball • Amateur Baseball League • Sophomore Boys baseball • Town Team Baseball League • Lexington Baseball League • Senior Babe Travel Baseball • VFW Team Primary Reservation Times 35 out of 76 (46%) of baseball game reservations begin at or near 6:00. 23 out of 76 (30%) of games begin after 7:00. Discussion Noise conflicts should be minimal between the baseball and skate park use. Parking, however, may be an issue in the evening. The parking area will likely see heaviest traffic in the evenings after 6:00. Use of the adjacent Lexington-Diffley athletic fields may create a greater demand on parking at Goat Hill Park, although most of the scheduled field uses at Lexington-Diffiey are at 6:00 or later. Preschool programs run during the day at Goat Hill's shelter building, and preschoolers would share the restroom with the skate park users. Restrooms are open to the public during preschool program hours, including the past years when the rink has been used for roller hockey. Preschool staff has expressed concern with conflicts between rink use by the preschool program and roller hockey users. Preschool programs use the Goat Figure 6: How Respondents Would Hill rink for 1/2 hour in the morning and Y2 Get to Skate Park hour in the afternoon. Staff has recently reported conflict with a group of youth who 200 refused to relinquish the rink for preschool 180 use. 160-- 140-- Survey Response 120-- 100-- Survey participants were asked how they 80 would get to a skate park if it were located 60 at Sky Hill Park, and asked the same about 40 Goat Hill Park. Most participants indicated 20 that they would drive or be driven to the 0 park (Figure 6). To a lesser extent, they Drive Walk Bike Skate Too far Other would bike or skate to the parks. Since to go most participants indicated they would be 0 Goat Hill ¦ Sky Hill driven to the park, it seems that transportation would be a secondary Figure 7: concern when deciding the site. Mow Far Respondents Would Most respondents indicated they were Travel to a Tier I Skate Park willing to travel up to approximately six miles to a skateboard park (Figure 7). Both 120 Sky Hill and Goat Hill Parks are well 110 within five to six miles from any 100 neighborhood in Eagan. Those responding 90 "other" frequently stated that they were 80 willing to go "as far as it takes" (or a 70 similar response). 50 50 40 30 20 10 0 •~,°'o roc 3 J~a~ o 12 r III. Funding and Costs During the subcommittee meeting on May 3, 2001, Commission members suggested a target budget of about $25,000 to $30,000. Funds would be derived from the Park Site Fund. This does not include the cost of paving the rink if Sky Hill Park is the selected site, which would increase the cost by about $25,000. IV. Insurance and Loss Control According to staff at the League of Minnesota Cities insurance division, the City is already covered for a Tier I skate park under its general liability insurance policy. If the City had gone to a Tier II level park, it would have had additional charges of approximately $3,000 per annum. Staff met with Loss Control specialist Ed Lucz from Berkley Risk Management in late May of 2001. Mr. Lucz indicated that a Tier I park is considered a "playground" and thus covered by the existing general liability policy. However, he did have recommendations for loss control: • During the first year of use, maintenance inspections should be aggressive, eventually tapering down if the equipment is holding up well. • Use waivers could be used, but this type of facility does not really necessitate them, nor are they particularly efficient. • Signage should include language regarding: - Recommending use of safety equipment - Rules of use. LMC does not have standard rules, cities must determine their own. - Hours of operation - Contact phone numbers. V. Teen Workshop with Landscape Structures/ EFA On July 2, 2001, representatives from Landscape Structures out of Delano met with teen volunteers. Using the recommended budget of $25,000 to $30,000, the teens put together a design that not only fit the budget but incorporated the elements that had been deemed most desirable. Configuration Survey data indicated that the top five most desired elements for a Tier I in Eagan are: 1. Ramp with box attachment 3. Ramp (11.8%) (14.3%) 4. Spine (11.2%) 2. Grind Rail (12.4%) 5. Pyramid (9.7%) Although it was not one of the options on the survey form, many respondents indicated a desire for a quarter or a half pipe. The teens and the representatives from Earl F. Anderson configured a modular design that incorporated most of the elements that were ranked in the top five. Modular designs will offer the City flexibility in location and seasonal use. The equipment can be moved and reassembled as appropriate. The design, as seen in Attachment I and 2, includes: 1) Mini half-pipe, 2) Wedge, 3) Three-sided pyramid with a rectangular curb rail, 4) Combo track (grind) rail, and 5) Quarter pipe. The cost for this design is approximately $26,695 (depending on who installs it), and is designed to fit within the confines of a hockey rink. The budget proposed by EFA, Inc. can be seen in Attachment 3. SUMMARY Survey data indicates strong public support from teens in the target demographic. Most teens said that they would be willing to travel up to about six miles to a skate park, but would likely be taken there via automobile no matter where the park was sited. The teen workshop produced a preliminary design incorporating the elements identified as highly desirable in the survey, but staying within the $25,000 to $30,000 budget. EFA and Landscape Structures reviewed the design for safety and use appropriateness. The modular components will allow the City flexibility in site and seasonal use. The preliminary design submitted by EFA Inc. would cost approximately $27,000. At the June 4, 2001 Parks and Recreation staff meeting, Park Maintenance Supervisor Steve Taylor commented on the damage to park equipment in a number of the parks from skateboards. He noted "it's really bad this year." Survey respondents cited streets, driveways, and public places as the primary areas they skate. Providing a facility for these skaters may prove beneficial for the safety of the skater, and help reduce the amount of damage to park property and business facilities. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION 1. Recommend to City Council the construction of a Tier I skate park facility at Goat Hill Park. 2. Recommend to City Council the construction of a Tier I skate park facility at Sky Hill Park with the understanding that the project budget would need to increase for rink paving costs. 3. Do not recommend the construction of a Tier I facility. 4. Other. 'I' Item: &A 614 e rk Attachment # 1. ?r-LVmXki;9rk - p seta\\ CF ' O N aw ax rrte~,., e.•~..Yw 43'~ y user' Tt•'i+' ~ - . WWI- VI G f h'X if '3. _ ' R4,i'°' t YnrH _ 'C~F^7. "fir Stry S. ~~1'?'t.~. qttr 1%,.+. yt~r6:.a `v' Ike t; M Item: (J-j- A t a?o?rk Attachment #2 • l~au~ 1 ti x • o m aW ax k O tti/d\ I ?in l V J Item: 6 _ % Ska*e- ,r1 . Attachment # j Ga} pro bs EPA PROPOSAL TO: Earl F. Andebf Eagan' FROM: Earl F. Andersen, Inc. 3830 Pilot Knob Road 9701 Penn Ave. S. Eagan, MN 55122 Bloomington, MN 55431 ATTN: Ken Vraa PHONE: 651-681-4660 PHONE: 952-884-7300 FAX: 651-681-4612 FAX: 952-884-5619 DATE: 07/06/01 REFERENCE: B010706AA PROJECT: Goat Hill Park Skate Park Design TERMS: To be determined QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE EACH TOTAL SkateWave Custom Designed Skate Park, per plan $ 22,380.00 SK8-111284-see attached, equipment only. * Installation supervisor at $600.00 per day with a $ 1,200.00 Not Included minimum of 10 volunteers ( 2 days estimated) 'Materials delivered to site to be coordinated with freight company and unloaded by City. NOTE: This quotation is valid for30 days. SUBTOTAL $ 22,380.00 Please call for confirmation after that date. SALES TAX $ 1,454.70 Prices are NOT based on prevailing wages. FREIGHT $ 360.46 INSTALLATION $ 2,500.00 Do you need a 24-hour call prior to delivery notice? Yes No TOTAL $ 26,695.16 DISCLAIMER FOR UNKNOWN CONDITIONS: The following disclaimer applies only when installation is quoted. This quotation is based on the area being free of all debris such as, but not limited to the following: *Concrete footings or blocks of any type. *Bedrock or rocky conditions of any type. *Tree stumps, trees, cans, bottles, metal or any other debris. 'Utilities requiring any holes to be dug by hand. if area is not accessible to a bobcat and other equipment necessary for installation. if water exists in site area or footings after they are dug. Or any other unknown conditions not listed or visible. FOB Factory Shipment approx weeks after receipt of order. r---_ Accepted by: Signed by: -r- 19WDFsei' W0it S, #100 • Bloomington, MN 55431 • Phone: 952-884-7300. 1-800-862-6026 • Fax: 952-884-5619 www.efa-mn.com • e-mail: parkandrecinfo@efa-mn.com OR trafficinfo@efa-mn.com EEO/AA Date: July 16, 2001 Agenda Item: GA; Wetland Conservation Recommendations City of Eagan Action X Parks and Recreation MEMO Information Attachments X A Central Park Replacement Plan B: Central Parkway Replacement Plan AGENDA ITEM: G-3; WETLAND CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: ERIC MACBETH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR I ITEM OVERVIEW: Recommend City Council to adopt formal decisions to replace wetlands that will be impacted by development of Central Park and Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway, in accordance Local Government Unit authority granted by Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 requires persons or entities proposing to impact a wetland by draining, excavating (wetland types 3, 4, or 5 only), or filling to first, attempt to avoid the impact; second, attempt to minimize the impact; and finally, replace any impacted area with another wetland of equal function or value. Certain projects are exempt from the requirement for a replacement plan under the WCA. For public-water wetlands, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) administers its Public Waters Work Permit Program inside wetland boundaries. For non- public-water wetlands, local government units administer the WCA with oversight by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. MDNR conservation officers and other peace officers enforce the WCA. Federal authority through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act also may apply to impacts of wetlands within the city, but only if the Corps of Engineers determines the wetlands to be associated with federal navigable waters. ANALYSIS: The 60-acre land parcel being developed by the City Parks and Recreation Department as "Central Park" includes four wetlands, all under WCA jurisdiction. The portion of the Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway street improvement being coordinated by the City Engineering Division includes one wetland, also under WCA jurisdiction. The Central Park project includes: 1) creating a skating/recreational amenity pond inside the wetland boundary of City Pond CP-4, a 3.45-acre Type 5 wetland in the center of the site; 2) grading for a bandshell amphitheater, which is located adjacent to CP-4; and 3) grading within a 0.13-acre Type 2 wetland south of CP-4 to match upland contours for a community center building (see Attachment A). Respective wetland impacts are: 1) 32,203.5 square feet; 2) 2,622.5 square feet; and 3) 581.3 square feet. Because of limitations for on-site replacement of these impacts on a 2:1 WCA-required basis, the City plans to withdraw the 1.62-acre needed replacement from its 3.5-acre wetland banking account. Recall that last 'S year the City acquired these wetland banking credits as part of a 27-plus acre wetland restoration project in Eureka Township in Dakota County. The Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway project will impact 0.35 acres of wetland edge of City Pond CP-5, a 3.2-acre Type 5 wetland located just east of the Central Park site (see Attachment B). The City plans to mitigate this impact by creating 0.43 acres of new wetland area and 0.38 acres of wetland buffer along the southeast edge of CP-5. DISCUSSION/EVALUATION: Eagan City Council adopted Resolution Number 94.18 on March 15, 1994, which officially recognized its previous acceptance of responsibility as the WCA local government unit. Thus, both projects' wetland replacement plans are under City of Eagan jurisdiction. As such, City Council must make formal replacement plan decisions and publicly notice those decisions. The Corps of Engineers almost assuredly will waive its Section 404 authority for both decisions. As an advisory body, it is appropriate for the Advisory Parks Commission to make recommendations to the City Council relating to all wetland replacement plans in Eagan. Such recommendations need to occur in a sufficiently timely fashion so that LGU decisions, state and federal oversight, and public review take place prior to actual work. As a matter of state law, the City needs to follow the same procedures as any other person or entity regarding wetland impacts and replacement. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Recommend City Council to adopt formal decisions to replace wetlands that will be impacted by development of Central Park and Central Parkway/Northwood Parkway. 1' 0 Item: - 3 Wo a,?a Cotes ervabor RA-(ow At^e) 'f oxs NA-02620-02 Attachment # A. CA+rsr\ irk Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Vl LOCAL AND STATE: Application for Local Government Unit Approval pursuant to Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) Application for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Permit to Woik in Public Waters Application for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certification FEDERAL: Application for the Department of the Army Permit (33 CFR 325) Use these application forms to apply to 1) the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU), 2) the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and 3) the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for authorization of any proposed water/wetland project affecting lakes, rivers, streams or wetlands that may fall within the jurisdiction of any (or all) of these three agencies. If 401 certification is required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the COE will forward these application forms to the MPCA for processing. You do not need to send this application to the MPCA. This application packet includes the following: [PART 1: BASIC APPLICATION must be filled out by all applicants (pages 1-3, plus requested attachments). APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT (page 4) must also be completed (non-shaded blocks only), signed and submitted by the applicant or agent, along with Part 1, to complete the Federal (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) component of the application process using these forms. [PART 2: REPLACEMENT AND SUPPLEMENT must be filled out by applicants who need to develop a replacement plan for wetland mitigation (pages 5-8, plus requested attachments). [INSTRUCTIONS (Instruction 1-4) are provided to assist with completion and mailing of the application. Before beginning work on your project, you must receive all required approvals from your LGU, the DNR and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If you have not receive a reply after 45 days, or if you wish to confirm the status of your application at any time, contact the agencies directly (see Instructions, page 4). Proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may result in fines or other penalties. If you have questions or need assistance with filling out these forms, contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office, your LGU, your regional DNR office, or your COE regulatory field office (see Instructions, page 4). Note 1: If you believe that your project may be subject to Watershed District regulation, local Planning and Zoning jurisdiction, or any other locally implemented or enacted controls beside those of your LGU, contact the appropriate office(s) directly in addition to your LGU, the DNR, and the COE. Note 2: If you are a Federal Farm Program participant, and if your project affects a wetland or water body on agricultural land, your eligibility for USDA benefits maybe affected. In addition to your LGU, the DNR, and the COE, contact your local Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) office to request and complete the appropriate form before initiating any activity. A. QUICK LOOK AT THE PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS 1. Send copies of these completed application forms to your LGU, 4. When the review process is complete, your application will either your regional DNR office, and your COE regulatory. office,., be approved, approved with changed or conditions, withdrawn, or denied; You will be informed of the decision. 2. Any of the agencies may make initial contact with you to a) inform you that it has no jurisdiction over your project; b) request additional 5. For information about laws, rules and regulations that direct this information needed; or c) inform you of applicable fees: process, the website www.revisoraegstate.mn.us includes complete State of Minnesota waters and wetlands laws and rules, and the 3. When your application is considered complete and appropriate fees websitewww.mvp:usace.army mit provides information onU.S. Army have been received (if requested), your application will be distributed Corps of Engineers regulations. for appropriate agency review and public comments. 6. For information on the appeals process, contact the appropriate agency (see Instructions, page 4). NA-02620-02 (V.1.01 for MS WORD) 2.16.01 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetiand Projects FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY, Application No Field Office Code Date Initial Application Rec=d Date Initial Application Deemed Complete PART 1: BASIC APPLICATION "See HELP" directs you to important additional information and assistance in Instructions, page 1. 1. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION (See HELP 1): IA. AUTHORIZED AGENT (See HELP IA.) (Only if applicable; an agent is required) Name: City of Eagan Complete mailing address: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Name: Eric Macbeth Eagan. Minnesota 55122-1897 Title: Water Resources Coordinator Mailing address: 3501 Coachman Point Residential Phone: ( ) Eagan. MN 55122-1897 Business Phone: (651) 681-4600 Residential Phone: ( ) Fax (if available): (651) 681-4612 Business Phone: (651) 681-4300 E-mail (f available): Fax (if available): (651)681-4360 2. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (if applicable): E-mail (if available): Central Park Proiect I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as an agent in the processing of this 3. NAME OR I.D. # OF WATER BODY(S) IMPACTED- application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental (if applicable; if known): information in support of this application. CP-4 Applicant Signature Date 4a. ANY WETLANDS IMPACTED? ® Yes ? No 4c. If YES, indicate size of entire wetland (check one): 4b. If YES, what type (if known; check all that apply): Less than 10 acres (indicate size: 3.58 ) 10 to 40 cacres 1 [111, 02 [13 [14 ®5 []6 E17 [18 []R []unknown ? than ? ? Greater r than 40 acres 5. PROJECT LOCATION" (information can be found on property tax statement, property title or title insurance): Section: SE SE Section: 09 Township: 27N Range: 23W County: Dakota Lot Block: Subdivision: 6. ADDITIONAL LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS' (if applicable; if known): Parcel ID #/Geocode: UTM Coordinates: easterly Northerly Project street address: Fire **For multiple water bodies or locations, attach additional sheets labeled ADDITIONAL WA TER BODIES IMPACTED, ADDITIONAL PROJECT LOCATIONS, or ADDITIONAL LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS. 1 7. HOW TO GET TO THE SITE: Attach a simple site locator map. If needed, include on the map written directions to the site from a known location or landmark. Include highway and street names and numbers. Also provide distances from known locations and any information that would assist in locating the site. Label the sheet SITE LOCATOR MAP. d. PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT: What do you propose to do, and why is it needed? Please be brief. (See HELP 8 before completing this section.) Develop a 60-acre city park site (a.k.a. Central Park) which will include a community center building that overlooks a wetland and a planned skating/recreational amenity pond. Site preparation includes grading for a bandshell amphitheater and a community center. 9. PROPOSED TIMELINE: Approximate project start date: 7/2001 Projected end date: 10/2002 10. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe in detail what you plan to do and how you plan to do it. This is the most important part of your application. See HELP 10 before completing this section; see also What To Include on Plans (Instructions, page 2). If space below is not adequate, attach separate sheet labeled PROJECT DESCRIPTION. 1) Create a 32,203.53 square foot skating/recreational amenity pond within the boundary of City Pond CP-4, a 150,281 square foot Type 5 jurisdictional wetland. Impact on the wetland will include grading of amenity pond bottom contours and using wetland sediment to establish a berm that separates the amenity pond from the remaining undisturbed wetland. 2) Fill 2,622.54 square feet of City Pond CP-4 to match upland contours for the development of a bandshell amphitheater. 3) Fill 581.26 square feet of a 5,663 square foot Type 2 jurisdictional wetland (unnamed city pond) to match upland contours for southeast aspect of community center building. 11. FOOTPRINT OF IMPACT (if applicable): Indicate total amount (in acres or square feet) of wetland(s) or water body area(s) to be filled, drained, inundated, or excavated; and/or indicate length of stream or river affected (in linear feet). acres or 35.407.33 square feet and/or linear feet 12. TYPE AND ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF MATERIAL(S) TO BE PLACED INTO OR EXCAVATED FROM THE WETLAND OR WATER BODY if applicable): List each type of material (such as rock, sand, clay, concrete) to be filled or excavated, and estimate the amount in cubic yards. 0 FILLING ? EXCAVATING Type(s) of material Estimated amount in cubic yards Type(s) of material Estimated amount in cubic yards Quam silt loam 1,000 Wadena-Hawick loam- 250 sandy loam 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: N/A (for determination of DNR fees only, which are based on total project cost) 2 14. SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that could have avoided or minimized impacts to wetlands or water? List at least two alternatives (one of which may be Ano build or Ado aothing@), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. Refer to attached Sequencing Findings of Fact 15. PORTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work already completed? 0 Yes 0 No. If yes, describe the completed work on a separate sheet of paper labeled WORK ALREADY COMPLETED. (See HELP 15 before completing this section.) 16. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that impact more than 10,000 square feet of water or wetlands, list below complete names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners whose property also adjoins the wetland or water body where the work is being proposed. (See HELP 16. If necessary, attach a separate sheet labeled ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS.) Complete name(s) Complete mailing address (including street address, city, state, zip code) N/A 17. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: List any other permits, reviews or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending or have already been approved or denied. See HELP 17. If already applied for Agency Type of Approval ID Number Date applied for Date approved Date denied N/A 18. I am applying for state and local authorization to conduct the work described in this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part 1 is true, complete, and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Signature of applicant Date OR Signature of agent Date This block must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (the applicant in Section 1) or by the applicant=s duly authorized agent (if the boxed Section IA has been filled out and signed by the applicant.) Federal authorization: Generally, in addition to state authorization, projects in wetland or water areas also require Federal authorization from the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. To apply to the Corps using this application package, the applicant/agent must complete the modified one-page Federal Application form on page 4 and mail it to the Corps (address on Instructions, page 4) with a copy of the state application. Applicants may, if they wish, apply only for Corps authorization by using the unmodified federal application form that is available from Corps offices or via the internet at I www.mvp.usace.army.mil. 3 APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT (33 CFR 325) OMB APPROVAL NO. (RENEWAL PENDING) The public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service rrectorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork uction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to .rply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit Routine uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other Federal, state, and local government agencies. Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. ITEMS I THROUGH 4 TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CORPS 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED . 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED YOU DO NOT NEED TO COMPLETE THE SHADED AREAS. All applicants need to complete non-shaded items 5 and 26. If an agent is to be used, also complete items 8 and 11. $9 This optional Federal form is valid for use only when included as part of this entire state application packet. 5. APPLICANT=S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT=S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required) City of Eagan Eric Macbeth, Water Resources Coordinator 6. APPLICANT=S ADDRESS 9. AGENT=S ADDRESS 7. APPLICANT=S PHONE NO. 10. AGENT=S PHONE NO. 11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION (if applicable; complete only if authorizing an agent) I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANT=S SIGNATURE: DATE: 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) 3. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE J 18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 19. PROJECT PURPOSE 20. REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE 21. TYPES OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS 22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED 23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? YES- NO IF YES, DESCRIBE COMPLETED WORK. 24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, 25. LIST OF OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION: 26.Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Signature of applicant Date Signature of agent (if any) Date The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant), or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the aternent in Block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or ;ncy of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up with any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious ,,i fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR) 4 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects DO YOU NEED TO COMPLETE PART 2? Part 2: Replacement Plan Supplement must be completed by anyone who needs to develop a replacement plan for wetland mitigation. If you=re not sure whether your project requires a replacement plan: [Call your LGU or SWCD office for guidance as to whether your project will require completing Part 2. If it is determined that your project will require wetland replacement, complete and submit Part 2 along with Part 1. [If you prefer, you may chose to send in Part 1 only. After reviewing your application, the responding agencies will let you know if you need to complete and return Part 2.. Caution: If your project will require wetland replacement, completing and returning both parts immediately is advisable. Submitting Part 1 and Part 2 separately rather than at the same time may extend the application review process. PART 2: REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT For assistance in completing Part 2, contact your LGU or a professional consultant. 19. DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS: Complete the chart below: l)Use one row of boxes for each wetland impact. 2)If your project has more than one wetland impact, reference your overhead view (part of Section 10) to this chart by identifying and labeling Afirst impact@ and Asecond impact® on your overhead view. 3)If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank. 4)If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area. 5)If you do not have access to some of the information, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy chart for more impacts, if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Netland Watershed Is site within Wetland type' Predominant size of area Existing land use in project impact (as name or 1000 ft of a vegetation in impacted area (check all that apply) noted on number (if lake or 300 ft impacted (in acres or overhead known) of a river? wetland area square view) (YES or NO) feet) CP-4 NO 5 open water 32,203.53 ? housing area SF ? commercial First --0 industrial Impact forested/shrub 2,622.54 SF parkslrecreation areas ede ? highways and associated rights-of-way forested ? farmsteads/agricultural vacant lands cattail, willow, 581.26 SF public and semi-public goldenrod, r-o (schools/gov't facilities) Second ? airports - finnwonrl------- ? extractive (gravel impact pitslquarries) ? other: 'If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact areda. TOTALS OF AREA(S) IMPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE ON CHART (indicate acres ? or square feet E) Type: 1: 1L: 2: 581.26 3: 4: 5: 34.826.07 6: 7: 8: R: 5 20. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply to either impact the site(s) or the replacement of site(s)? ? Yes ® No (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, or waste disposal sites) If YES, list and describe briefly. 21. ARCHEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCE DETERMINATIONS: Are you aware of any archeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys com leted concerning the project or replacement site by the State Historical Society Preservation Office (SHPO) or others? ? Yes No If yes, please explain below or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. 22. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: Indicate how proposed replacement will be accomplished (check only one box below and continue as indicated): ? A. Wetland banking only • Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us • Skip to Section 27, page 8. (You do not need to complete Sections 23-26.) ? B. Project-specific replacement only • Continue with Section 23 below. ? C. A combination of wetland banking and project-specific replacement • Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us • Continue with Section 23 below. 23. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S) CONSTRUCTION (Complete this section only if you marked Box B or Box C in Section 22 above): Describe in detail how replacement wetland(s) will be constructed. If several methods will be used, describe each method. Details should include the following: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored by tile break, restored by ditch block or revegetated); 2) type, size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks or key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosion or site degradation; 5) proposed timetable for starting and ending the project; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Write this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 24. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project-specific replacement (Box B or Box C in Section 22 above), will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? 0 YES ? NO. If yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from your LGU, .)r download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us 6 25. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland replacement site. 2) If your project has more than one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (part of Section 26) to this chart by identifying and labeling Afirst replacement site® and Asecond replacement sited on your overhead view. 3) If you are •4entifying only one wetland type within a given replacement site, use the first dotted line(s) and leave the others blank. 4) If you ve chosen to identify more than one wetland type in a given replacement site, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify type(s) of replacement credits and Arestored or created® for each separate wetland type within that replacement site. 5) If you do not have access to some of the information, or-if you do not know your replacement ratio, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy chart for more wetland replacements, if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS Wetland Watershed County Topo- Wetland Type(s) of replacement credits Restored replacement name or graphic Type, (in acres or square feet) or site number setting' created? (as noted on (if known) New Wetland Public Value Indicate overhead view) Credits (NWC) Credits (PVC) R or C First replacement site Second replacement site 'Ttopographic setting types: Indicate S for Shoreland; R for Riverine; F for Floodplain; FT for Flow-through; T for Tributary; and I for Isolated. . TOTAL NWC TOTAL PVC 2Cicular 39 wetland types: Indicatel, IL, 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, R, or U. If you are REQUIRED REPLACEMENT RATIO: identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first lotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one (If known) .vetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area. 26. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT-SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT (Required only if you marked Box B or Box C in Section 22): For projects involving at least some project-specific replacement, include the following additional information: ? Two drawings to scale of the replacement wetland. Include both overhead view and profile (side view or cross- sectional view). See What To Include on Plans (Instructions, page 2) for a detailed description of what should be included in these drawings. Without drawings, your application will be considered incomplete. ? For created replacement wetlands, include additional soils information (if available) that indicates the capability of the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics. (Note 1: For replacement wetlands located on pipeline easements, you need to receive endorsement of your project from both the easement holder and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety=s Office of Pipeline Safety. Before start of construction, the owner of any utilities involved must be notified. The landowner or contractor is responsible for giving this notice by calling AGopher State One-Call® at 651-454-0002 (Twin Cities Metro Area) or 1-800-252-1166 (all other locations). Mote 2: For extensive or complex projects supplementary information maybe requested at a later date from one or more of the responding agencies. Such information may include (but not be limited to) the following: topographic map, water table map, soil borings, depth soundings, aerial photographs, environmental assessment and/or engineering reports. 7 27. SIGNED AFFIRMATIONS: Sign and date either Box 27a or Box 27b below. If your project involves replacement by wetland banking only, sign Box 27a. For all other projects, read Box 27b, check appropriate boxes in Part B, and sign. 27a. For projects involving replacement by wetland banking only: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part 2 is true, complete and accurate; and I affirm that the wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. Signature of applicant or agent Date 27b. For projects involving either project-specific replacement only or a combination of wetland banking and project-specific replacement: Part A: The replacement wetland (affirm all statements): [Was not previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit; AND Was not drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years; AND Was not restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs; AND Was not restored using private funds, other than those of the landowner, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration; and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. Part B: Additional assurances (check all that apply): ? The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland. ? An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performance bond, or other acceptable security has been provided to guarantee the successful completion of the wetland replacement. ? The wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. Part C: For projects involving any project-specific replacement: Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s) will be located; and I will at the same time submit proof of such recording to the LGU. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part 2 is true, complete and accurate; and I affirm all statements in Parts A and C, as well as checked assurance(s) in Part B. Signature of applicant or agent Date RLGUSE O'cLY 40- Replacement plan is (ehe`ck one) [A'pprove'd Apr .d wrtlhco"tions(conditions attached).* denied "All l ' t =EGG o cial signature TJat~ LGU has, ;eceived evidence of title and proofof record ng ,j f Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement etlaad d xt 3 5 County ere corded ae~Dacumentassgned byreeorder z y F~ x x L r, bGt ocuzl s}gnature Date 8 Item: G - 3 y~~~CLa..~ CCMSe "d-A- r RECONSULTING G R O Attachment # R Transportation ¦ Civil ¦ Structural ¦ Environmental • Planning • Traffic • Landb.ur, rarrung SRF No. 0993665 MEMORANDUM TO: Eric MacBeth City of Eagan 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Engineer / - Tom Hillstrom, Associate DATE: July 12, 2001 SUBJECT: CENTRAL PARKWAY WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN The enclosed wetland mitigation plan is an amendment to the previously submitted permit application. As stated in the permit application, the Central Parkway project will impact 0.36 acre of wetlands. The wetland impacts require 0.81 acre of mitigation, which will be accomplished through the creation of 0.43 acres of new wetland and 0.38 acres of upland buffer. We have attached a narrative describing the proposed wetland mitigation, a figure showing new wetland and upland buffer areas and a grading plan. Please feel free to call if you have comments or questions. THJSIJsmf Attachment One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Telephone (763) 475-0010 ¦ Fax (763) 475-2429 ¦ http: / /www.srfconsulting.com An Equal Opportunity Employer Central Parkway Mitigation Plan City of Eagan C.P. NO. 7909 This plan is an addendum to a permit application submitted to the Ctiy of Eagan on May 4, 2001. The original permit application did not include a detailed mitigation plan. Location of Wetland Mitigation New wetlands will be created near the location of the wetland impacts. Figure 1 shows that the location of the proposed wetland mitigation. The wetland that would be impacted by the project is located east of Pilot Knob Road, north of Maurice Drive and south of High Site Road and is known as basin CP-5. The project would impact 0.35 acres of the north edge of this wetland and the mitigation plan would enlarge this basin to the southeast. As shown on Figure 2, In general the mitigation plan is to enlarge wetland CP-5 to the southeast. Mitigation Site Background _ A storm water pond is planned for a portion of the mitigation parcel. The pond would treat runoff from a planned development south of Maurice Drive. A wetland currently exists on the site. The storm water pond would be constructed partially within this wetland. Mitigation Plan The mitigation basin would be constructed as shown on Figure 2. Upland topsoil would be scraped off the site and stockpiled. The mitigation area would then be excavated to approximately one foot below final grades and lined with the stockpiled topsoil. The new wetland area will be seeded with MnDOT seed mix 25k. The surrounding upland will be seeded with MnDOT seed mix 50A. The proposed mitigation plan would create 0.43 acres of new Type 3 wetland and 0.38 acres of upland buffer. fft 7 - PRO OSE CONTOUR (TYP Gr 1' ~r WETLAND EAGAN POND CP-5 NWL = 873.00 EXISTING CONTOUR (TY . HWL = 875.90 • r--CONSTRUCTION'LIW IS EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY FUTURE OW LOCATION LEGEND i \ NEW WETLAND CREDIT UB.BO0 4q-ft.) [ZaJ UPLAND BUFFER 06.500 sp.ft.) EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY O ~ \ W w sx I w 10 ff CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE PROJ. NO. 790R CENTRAL PARKWAY AND NORTHWOOD PARKWAY A-TR C..aJtlnB G.o.P.lee „ , ~Rr WETLAND MITIGATION SITE OATE,O6ZIp GENERAL NOTES: OIS I. NO O DIRIR+TION OF EK IST ING WE TLANOS HILL BE ALLOWED. 2. THE EDGE OF THE PRO+OSED METLANO BOWDARr IS AT ELEVATION e7.0'. 7. INIi TO I'OF TOPSOILnUCU/VEGETATION SHALL BE STRIPPED YIIT IGATION(AREA. MITIGATIOO- E $SNALGL BE OVER-EXCAVATED I FOOT AND BACKFILLED TO FINAL CONTOURS IONII SHOWN N X IT STOCK- PILED MATERIAL. MITIGATION AREA BELOW THE WETLAND t. AC0NTe011R$ $HAILBE U~NNEEYENEAND IR0.L TIM TOXPRODUCEB VARIABLE SHORELINE AN0 WATEp DEPM F1NAl CONTOIMS BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL By THE ENGINEER SMALL 5. NITIGAT AREAS ION D ApEASBrABOVE THE WE DI STURBETLANSHDALL RE B CDIp1DARr AND ALL IMIAtA CONSTRUCTION LIVE 6 TOPSOIL AND BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIXTURE S INCHES OF OB PRO OSE CONTOUR (TYP X o by ~Rly ~O WETLAND A4 EAGAN POND CP-5 '`•ol 4y NWL = 873.00 875.90 EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY ' --CONSRUCTION/ LIMITS r' /y LEGEND f"--- FUTURE POND LOCATION • ~ ` \ \\i SEED SOA ® SEED MIXTURE 25A BIODEGRADABLE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET i f \ CLEAR AND GRUB ! t SILT FENCE EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY ` FLOATING SILT CURTAIN \ ads 4! ~h 1 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS " 6 R cgJ~w er ~~u.1 inni-~Alayy +o.clrlrn•lan tlwt Ir- q- STATE a Wir Llan,- 41. ",MI TAI- id PROJECTT ND. yg By DATE IA.A e •t» St.,. At NI,Yy.p,A.I^A•r'^0•r ,M SQL CITY OF EAGAN CONTRACT N0. 01-0 - DATE 01 f:k0 APPR Ih•In• A-A: uAT7M- N PROD -01 DESIGNED By ~YYY NAME 4OOB.CNA ATE. M0 .29 2001 I •°A-D_ S.u•r.•.•r ..p CONSULTING CITr PRWECt tAl. r" cNECAFD ay MITKGATION SITE CRA0R10 PLAN D.,. _ Ll- • ~136A " C coMN:ND. GROUP, INC. CENTRAL PARKWAY & NORTHWOOD PART Date: June 18, 2001 Agenda Item: H-1; Golf Course Study Committee . .l Action City of Eagan Information X Parrs and Recreation MEMO Attachments X 1. Informative memo regarding the Study Committee presented to City Council on July 5, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: H-1; GOLF COURSE STUDY COMMITTEE TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION BETH A. WIELDE, RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROJECTS I ITEM DESCRIPTION: Preliminary information about the formation of a study committee to investigate the feasibility of a City operated golf course BACKGROUND The City Council has identified the investigation of a city-operated golf course in its goals for 2001. The Council has discussed the golf course as a self-sustaining operation, an enterprise in the same manner as Cascade Bay or the Civic Arena. City staff has been asked to begin investigation into the feasibility of such an enterprise. ANALYSIS Staff met in late June of 2001 to discuss composition and responsibilities of a Golf Course Exploratory (study) Committee. Attachment 1 describes the need for an exploratory committee, the composition and selection process, the scope of responsibilities, and an application for citizens who may be interested in serving on the committee. This memo was presented to the City Council on July 5, 2001 as an informative item. No action was taken at that time. The issue will be brought to the Council at the July 17 meeting seeking further direction on the formation of the study committee. Council has requested that two members of the Advisory Parks Commission, two members of the Advisory Planning Commission, and up to eleven additional citizen members serve on the Study Committee. The APrC will need to appoint two members to serve on this committee. There is no information regarding the expected timeline of the study, or anticipated work schedule. Staff will update the APrC as information becomes available. ACTION FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION 1. Appointment of two APrC members to serve on the Golf Course Exploratory Committee 2. Other 17 Item: (Q V-CD)t s e S Attachment # , Zn~ort~uc}c.lt Nla"w pttse~tea -t„ Ca.~?cl city of aagan EAGAN GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE Composition and Selection Process Purpose: The purpose of the exploratory committee is (1) to determine the suitability of land for development of a golf course.; (2) to critically consider a feasibility report prepared by consultants; (3) to determine public interest in and need for a golf course; (4) to assess golf course development as a public enterprise that must generate revenue and independently pay down any debt service; (5) to navigate the regulatory and intergovernmental issues pertaining to golf course development; and (6) to provide feedback on possible programmatic elements of a golf course. Tenure: The committee shall be created by Council action at the August 7, 2001 regular City Council meeting and shall exist until disbanded by Council action. Composition: The Eagan City Council seeks a diverse committee to represent the various perspectives within the community. As a public venture, it is important to select men and women, golfers and non-golfers, members of the business community, civic leaders, two representatives each from the Advisory Planning and Advisory Parks and Recreation Commissions, and other Eagan residents interested in considering the public questions pertaining to a potential golf course development in Eagan. The Committee shall select its own chair. MEMBERSHIP: Two (2) members of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Two (2) members of the Advisory Planning Commission Up to eleven (11) additional members STAFF: City Administrator and other staff as needed Director of Parks and Recreation and other staff as needed Planning Department Representative and other staff as needed Selection Process: Interested parties should contact Beth Wielde in the Parks and Recreation Department at bwielde@ciiyofeajzan.com or 651-681-4144 to obtain an application form. Applications are also available online at www. citvofeagan. com in a downloadable form. Applications are due no later that 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 1, 2001 to the attention of Beth Wielde, Parks and Recreation Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 The applications will be forwarded to the City Council for selection at the August 7, 2001 regular City Council meeting. All applicants will be notified of the status of their application in writing the week of August 13, 2001. 411~CMV of aagan EAGAN GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE Why does the City of Eagan need an Exploratory Committee Golfs popularity has reached unprecedented levels across the country; in Minnesota, golf is more popular than ever. A recent survey conducted by the National Golf Foundation found that Minnesota has the highest number of golfers per capita than any other state in the country! Consequently, the demand for new golf courses is extremely high. Like the national and state trends, the popularity of golf in Eagan is growing. Eagan's Parks and Recreation Department continues to expand its golf programs to keep up with the demand shown by Eagan residents. Participation in golf lessons offered by the City increased by over one hundred participants from 1999 to 2000, and the trend for greater participation is expected to continue. When Eagan residents were recently surveyed about new items they wished to see in the City, fifteen percent responded by saying, "I want a golf course." In addition to potentially serving as a profitable public enterprise operation for the City, the 2000 survey of the Eagan business community found that building a golf course was deemed to have high reward prospects regarding business retention and expansion. Recognizing that many of Eagan's citizens wish to further dialogue about the feasibility and effects of a golf course in Eagan, the Eagan City Council is creating the Eagan Golf Course Exploratory Committee to further study this timely public initiative. 41 city of aagan EAGAN GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE Scope of Committee Procedure and Responsibility - Once the Study Committee members have been appointed, they will be responsible for studying the various issues associated with the planning, operations, and financial feasibility of a golf course. The Study Committee will be asked to present their findings to recommend alternative courses of action for the City Council to consider. The Committee will review probable construction costs, probable operational expenses and income potential based on other facilities, user demand, and market placement, et cetera. Member should expect to work in a group setting assisted by City staff. The scope of responsibilities will further include: (1) Determine the suitability of land for development of a golf course. (2) Critically consider a feasibility report prepared by consultants. a. Before any decisions can be made by the Council about a possible golf course development, feasibility needs to be determined. The Committee may find the need to enlist the services of professionals specializing in golf course planning, operations, market analysis, or various other aspects of golf courses. b. If a report is recommended and authorized by the City Council, the committee will also be responsible for critically assessing the results of the study and referring its recommendation to the City Council for consideration. (3) Determine public interest in and need for a golf course. (4) Assess golf course development as a public enterprise that must generate revenue and independently pay down any debt service. (5) Navigate the regulatory and intergovernmental issues that may arise. (6) Provide feedback on possible programmatic elements of a golf course. a. User Diversity - consider ways to develop a course that enables participation by all user demographics without regard to athletic ability, economic status, gender, race, sex, religion, ethnicity or physical capabilities. b. Usage - tournament use, recreational games, membership vs. walk-in, etc. c. Amenities - consideration of possible amenities (i.e. driving range) d. Level of Golf Course - 9- vs. 18-hole, degree of difficulty, etc. city of aagan EAGAN GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION **please type or print in ink** NAME DATE In order that the Mayor and City Council have a better understanding of your background and interests, please provide the following information. Please attach additional sheets if necessary. HoME ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: How LONG HAVE YOU BEEN PART OF THE EAGAN COMMUNITY? EMPLOYER: OCCUPATION: WORK PHONE: PLEASE LIST ANY PRIOR EXPERIENCE YOU HAVE ON CITY COMMISSIONS, CITY BOARDS, ETC. Page 1 of 1 WHY ARE YOU SEEKING A POSITION ON THE EAGAN GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE? PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW YOUR EXPERIENCE AS A MEMBER OF THE EAGAN COMMUNITY WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE PURPOSE OF THE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE. RETURN TO: BETH WIELDE, PARKS AND RECREATION RECEIVED: EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 TELEPHONE: 651-681-4600 FAX: 651-681-4612 APPLICATIONS DUE BY 4:30 P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2001. Page 2 of 2 Date: July 16, 2001 Agenda Item: J-l; Grant Recognition Action City of Eagan Information X1 Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments AGENDA ITEM: J-1; GRANT RECOGNITION TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: LOUDI RIVAMONTE, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR I ITEM OVERVIEW: Youth Development supplemental funding sources; an overview of outside funding BACKGROUND Youth Development programs have greatly benefited from several different grant awards and funding sources. These supplemental funding sources have allowed the program to expand and address the changing needs of the targeted populations. Below is a list of grants and funding secured since 1997 Funding Year(s) Funding Source Amount Application of Funds 1997 Crime Prevention Grant $2,592.74 Wescott site to increase staffing, Eagan Police Department purchase equipment and fund a crime prevention event. 1997 Dakota County Seed $1200.00 Wescott site to implement a three-part Money Grant drug prevention program 1997 State of MN CFL $3,660 Wescott site tutoring program and Library Grant field trips. 1997 MN Recreation and $2,000 Wescott site multicultural program. Park Association 1997 CDBG $5,000 Wescott site elementary-age program staffing and equipment. 1998/99 ISD 197 LCTS $12,394 Develop and implement program at Grant Quarry Park site. 1998/99 State of MN $12,442.50 Supplement staffing and programming Mighty Kids Grant at Quarry Park and Wescott. 1998 People's Natural Gas $1,000 Enhance teen program at Wescott. l1 1998/99 Dakota County Seed $2,000 Quarry Park neighborhood Money Grant representative position. Expansion into Rahn/Diffely neighborhood. 1998 CDBG $9,629.48 Wescott site elementary-age program, staffing, equipment and transportation. 1999 Metropolitan Regional $3,000 Implement an art camp for both sites. Arts Council 1999 CDBG $10,500 Wescott site elementary-age program, staffing, equipment and transportation. 2000/01 ISD 197 LCTS $19,550 Quarry Park program. Grant 2000 Metropolitan Regional $3,000 Implement an art camp for both sites. Arts Council 2000 CDB $10,500 Wescott site elementary-age program. 2001/02 ISD 196 LSTS $25,000 Wescott site expansion. Grant 20001 MN State Arts $4,000 Harvesting our Roots multicultural Board Grant Festival. 2001 Metropolitan Regional $3,000 Art camp for both sites. Arts Council 2001/02 ISD 197 LCTS $19,619.87 Quarry Park program. Grant 20001/02 Metropolitan Regional $3,000 Somali cultural arts program. Arts Council Total of supplemental funding: $ 153,088.59 ANALYSIS Efforts will continue to secure supplemental funding sources for the Youth Development program. Plans include securing larger, multi-year funding. DIRECTOR'S NOTE I had asked Loudi to put this information together for our own backgrouna then decided to share this with the Commission. It illustrates the magnitude of the program at Wescott, as 19 well as the resourcefulness of Loudi in the pursuit of alternative resources -Ken Yraa, Director of Parks and Recreation ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION This item is for informational purposes only. No action is required on this item. Date: July 16, 2001 Agenda Item: J-2; Winter Program Options Action X City of Eagan Information Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X 1. Attendance Stats -T-Z; AGENDA ITEM: WINTER PROGRAM OPTIONS TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION PREPARED BY: CATHY BOLDUC, RECREATION & EVENTS SUPERVISOR ITEM OVERVIEW: Frequently, staff closely reviews larger recreation programs to examine the financial effectiveness and ensure the most productive methods of organizing and implementing the program. The winter recreation sites were last reviewed in 1996. Current budget work and future community center plans make this a good opportunity to review the program again. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The winter recreation sites offer outdoor skating and tubing opportunities for the public at little to no charge. As a result, staff closely examines the operation hours, number of sites and their location as well as looking at options for program changes and budgetary effects. In 1996, a report to the Advisory Parks Commission outlined recommended changes to hours of several sites. The following season, hours at Class B sites were reduced slightly, saving both time and money for the Parks and Recreation Department as well as creating a more effective use of scarce staffing resources. ANALYSIS: At this time, staff is exploring the ice rink facilities and their costs as they relate to the 2002 budget process. The Advisory Parks Commission is respectfully asked to review the information and provide insight towards the future of the program. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department operates winter facilities at three priority levels. Class A Sites: Sites with the highest maintenance and staffing priority. Sites include Bridle Ridge Park, Goat Hill Park, Clearwater Park, Rahn Park, Sky Hill Park and Quarry Park. All six sites maintain a 6" base of ice, are flooded and have snow removed seven days per week and routine surface shaving. With the exception of Quarry Park, which opens at 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday (due to recreation programs), open hours with seasonal staff attendants are as follows: Mondays - Thursdays 4:00 - 9:00 p.m. Fridays 4:00 - 9:30 p.m. Saturdays 10:00 am - 9:30 p.m. Sundays 12:00 - 9:00 p.m. 2t Class B Sites: Sites with the second highest maintenance and staffing priority. Sites include Carnelian Park, Ridgecliff Park, Lexington Park, Pilot Knob Park, and Woodhaven Park. These sites maintain a 4 - 6" base of ice, are flooded and have snow removed seven days per week and periodic surface shaving. Operating hours with seasonal staff attendants are as follows: Carnelian and Ridgecliff Parks - Mondays - Fridays 4:00 - 9:00 p.m. Saturdays 10:00 am - 9:00 p.m. Sundays 12:00 - 8:00 p.m. Lexington, Pilot Knob and Woodhaven Parks - Mondays - Fridays 4:00 - 9:00 p.m. Saturdays - Sunday 12:00 - 5:00 p.m. Class C Sites: Sites of third maintenance priority and no seasonal attendant staff. Sites include Highview, Country Home, Evergreen, Slater Acres and Bur Oaks Parks. These sites maintain a 3 - 5" base of ice, and are flooded and have snow removed as is needed. Costs associated with the current operation of the facilities are summarized as follows: Seasonal Staffing Cost Detail for Rink Attendants: Number of weeks in a season I 1 weeks Number of sites staffed 11 weeks Average pay per hour Class A Sites $7.63 per hour Class B Sites $6.75 per hour Average number of hours per week Class A Sites 51 hours per week Class B Sites 44 hours per week Weekly cost per site Class A Sites $389.00 Class B Sites $279.00 Full season cost per site Class A Sites $4,280.00 Class B Sites $3,267.00 Full season cost for all sites Class A Sites $25,682.00 Class B Sites $16,335.00 Grand Total cost for seasonal staff $42,017.00 Maintenance Staff Cost Detail for Rinks: Number of weeks in operation 11 weeks Number of sites maintained 16 sites Weekly cost per site $350.00 Full season cost per site $3,856.00 Full season maintenance cost for all sites $61,700.00 2Z DISCUSSION/EVALUATION: Many options are available for the future of the winter facility program: Further limits to operation hours at selected site(s). Close a Site(s). Shorten the ice rink season. Maintain as is. Reduce flooding and snow removal to six days per week. )H A combination of above options. FURTHER LIMITS TO OPERATION HOURS AT SELECTED SITES Considerations: > Minimal reduction in recreational seasonal staff costs, dependant on new hours of operation. > No effect on Park Maintenance staff costs as the majority of these costs are fixed and their responsibilities would be focused elsewhere. > Possible confusion for staff and public, as additional sites would have individual operating hour schedules. > May create the opportunity to amend hours at the Class B sites to make them more consistent. Currently, some are only open five hours each weekend day and others have weekend hours similar to the Class A sites. > While all sites are candidates for operation reduction or site closure (listed below), based on visitation information the following are most likely to be affected: - Woodhaven Park - site was not opened in 2000/01 due to staffing constraints. No complaints were recorded in response. Pilot Knob Park - site is very close to where the new community center is planned and is basically situated in a corporate building parking lot. It recorded the fewest counted visitors in the 2000/01 season The 2002 budget does not request dollars for staff at a Central Park site facility. Carnelian Park - site recorded an approximate 245 visitors with an average of 18 per operating day, based on counts taken three times each day. Bridle Ridge Park - site recorded 286 visitors with an average of 17 counted per day. NOTE: Attached is the attendance result information for the 2000-01 season. A Word of Caution: Attendance numbers only reflect people that were present at the time the count was made, and not the total number of people that actually visited for the season. CLOSE A SITE(S) Considerations: > Park Maintenance staff will continue to have the same approximate costs. The hours will be transferred to other sites. > Ice quality at other sites may improve, in response to more attention being allocated with the reduction of site quantities. > A rental trailer, costing $1,000.00 annually, would not be needed. Presently, one trailer is rented for Woodhaven Park. > Approximate saving in recreational seasonal staff (rink attendant) of $3,400.00 per site for an 11-week season. 73 > As mentioned above, the sites most likely to consider are as follows: Woodhaven Park Pilot Knob Park Carnelian Park Bridle Ridge Park SHORTEN THE ICE RINK SEASON Considerations: > It's possible to begin the season at a later date or end the season earlier. Items to consider with this option are: What response would the public and hockey programs have? , Would seasonal staff be interested in a job that is eight to ten weeks in length? MAINTAIN OPERATION AS IN THE PAST Considerations: > A more careful observation and tracking program could be established for the 2001/02 season in which to gather more accurate data, resulting in more accurate projections for future years. REDUCE FLOODING & SNOW REMOVAL DAYS BY ONE Considerations: > Recreation seasonal staff costs would remain the same. > Reduction in overtime and salaries absorbed by Park Maintenance would save approximately $580.00 per site for a season, or $5,876.00 for ten sites for an 11-week season. > The most probable day to take out would be the Friday evening cleanings. HYBRID OF ABOVE OPTIONS Considerations: > Include pieces from the above options. Recommended points include: Close Woodhaven and Pilot Knob Parks permanently. Reduce flooding and snow removal maintenance to 6 days per week. Amend hours at the Class B sites, so their hours are all the same. Create a more effective tracking form for attendants to complete during the winter season. ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: It is requested, based on the presented information, that the Advisory Parks Commission review and determine if areas of the winter facility program should be further reviewed or other options considered in the event of necessary budget reductions. Ice Rink/Tubing Hill Attendance 2000/2001 Season B. Ridge (A) Carn. (B) Clear. (A) G. Hill (A) P. Knob (B) Quarry (A) Rahn (A) Ridge. (B) S. Hill (A) T. Farm Late Season 35 26 10 0 2 28 45 2 33 12 10 13 16 3 0 12 24 44 7 18 5 3 13 65 10 15 11 Tubing Hill 113 24 0 27 11 8 35 12 5 Season ended 61 31 3 15 7 43 23 10 18 3/11/2001 84 23 8 8 0 27 6 10 12 80 20 4 16 6 40 12 17 11 50 17 20 45 15 9 27 21 2 0 10 Ice Rink 72 15 70 17 15 22 31 5 40 2 Season ended 63 10 12 48 23 66 11 5 70 15 2/28/2001 109 18 1 37 17 10 2 9 17 108 0 14 9 21 14 3 43 15 0 3 59 6 25 28 15 10 15 5 55 37 37 10 4 12 45 19 56 35 0 5 41 13 15 85 134 117 50 0 7 27 142 81 109 45 24 29 22 51 101 167 60 59 21 20 151 89 55 27 37 0 32 160 90 9 2 29 60 20 48 75 157 4 0 32 44 110 82 60 38 40 44 178 100 90 61 45 110 95 82 45 26 33 53 43 58 40 49 60 165 152 105 15 25 22 40 160 76 40 42 81 34 140 r 3 50 5 9 47 30 74 80 16 14 0 133 Attendance Cont. B. Ridge (A) Carn. (B) Clear. (A) G. Hill (A) P. Knob (B) QuaM (A) Rahn (A) Rid e. (B) S. Hill (A) T. Farm 37 90 64 23 126 41 25 20 80 42 105 65 0 23 9 165 82 44 30 24 45 52 75 40 33 46 127 30 75 55 9 145 362 35 50 15 79 65 80 29 36 70 143 10 0 19 143 270 40 38 53 28 30 40 6 27 54 176 100 188 45 19 114 70 84 27 6 51 50 24 6 7 41 15 35 43 50 34 20 12 15 8 12 30 8 7 3 55 135 72 18 0 10 58 14 10 6 17 All Sites 70 35 20 7 244 Season began 62 18 25 29 22 12/16/2000 100 10 22 0 5 40 57 12 38 11 4 Early Season 10 0 B. Ridge (A) Carn. (B) Clear. (A) G. Hill (A) P. Knob (B) Quarry (A) Rahn (A) Rid e. (B) S. Hill (A) T. Farm Overall Season Total 2005 245 2053 1643 135 349 1594 286 2692 3772 14774 #--i-i-_. ------------------------------------------------------------------i----.~_. Report Days 32 14 55 52 13 13 55 20 50 49 353 Average/Day 63 18 37 32 10 27 29 14 54 77 36 Highest# 167 31 135 188 23 66 165 32 165 244 244 Lowest # 3 6 1 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 Median # 85 18.5 68 95.5 12.5 34.5 83.5 17 84 123 62 ABCNEWS.com : Skate Parks Crop Up Around Nation II si i l July 2 200? HOMEPAGE NEWS SUMMARY U.S. Select a opic INTERNATIONAL GO TO. HOMEPAGE H U.S. R FEATURE ':"ONEYScope %NEATHER.com _OCAL NEl!VS Skateboarding ENTERTAINrAE I.~T Comes Full Circle SPORTS `Outlaw Sport' Gets Its Own Space POLITICS By Oliver Libaw NEW;S corn I• HEALTH !_iFESTYLES katersan role la erstry half pipe at the skate park in Manhattan's N E W Y 0 R K, July 2 - For years, the hardest RAVEL Riverside Park. (ABCNEWS.com) skateboarding trick has been to find practice ••,'IDEO & AUDIO space without incurring the wrath of police, :'SCAS T s security guards and business owners - but that's beginning to change. _)Mf':"UN 1I' Y Skateboarding is enjoying perhaps the biggest boom in its 40-odd year history, with various industry groups putting the number of active skateboarders at between 9 million and 12 million - twice the number five years ago. With that surge in popularity comes an unprecedented push for places to pop Ollies, grind rails, and practice kick-flips without trouble from police or other officials. There are now more than 800 qi4 public skate parks around the country, up from just a few dozen five years ago, and some industry watchers say that number could double in the next year alone. "Skate parks are being built so fast that we can't keep track," says Heidi Lemmon, the mother of an active skateboarder and head of an advocacy group, Skate Park Association-USA, which pushes communities to build more spaces for skaters. Mainstream Exposure and Popularity Some industry watchers hopefully predict that skateboarding will soon be a generally accepted youth sport nationwide, with its own publicly funded practice spaces as common as baseball diamonds and basketball courts. Already skateboarding will be included as a demonstration sport in the 2004 Olympics, adding more television exposure for the sport in addition to the popular X-Games and Gravity Games competitions, and pushing it further into the mainstream spotlight. "This is a sport and we are athletes," says 11-year-old Adam Taylor, a skateboarder who has been campaigning for a skate park in his hometown of Keller, Texas. 'We need an area." California continues to be ground zero for the sport, but skate parks have been cropping up from Alaska to Wyoming, and in small Midwestern towns like Ketchum, Ind. Poor urban areas like Watts in South Central Los Angeles have opened parks as well, with the support of local police and school officials. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/skateparks010702.html 7/2/2001 ABCNEWS.com : Skate Parks Crop Up Around Nation Page 2 of 3 Just a couple years ago, virtually no city council or parks department was interested in attracting or accommodating skaters. Participants in the sport have generally been regarded as mischievous, if not delinquent youths, known for commandeering public plazas, school steps and other spaces to the irritation of nearby adults. `An Outlaw Sport' In the 1980s and early 1990s many communities cracked down on skateboarding, issuing tickets and fines, confiscating equipment and charging riders with vandalism and trespassing. "Our sport was essentially against the law," says Jim Fitzpatrick, head of the International Association of Skateboard Cos. "We kind of reside in a society where skateboarders have an ugly stereotype," says Shane Thomas, a 28-year-old data analyst and avid skater who who is campaigning for a skate park in Newport News, Va. That stereotype is changing, however. "These are our kids," says Dick Guthrie, parks director in Claremont, Calif. Skeptical officials there opened the city's first skate park in 1994, when local teens came forward saying they were tired of being harassed for doing their tricks. Like many others, he was shocked at the popularity of the new park, which features rails and cement swimming pool-like bowls for skaters to do tricks in. "It's our highest-attended recreation facility," Guthrie says. Guthrie now heads the Southern California Skate Park Coalition, a 60-city group of parks officials dealing with the issues of skate parks. Lots of Use, Few Problems "I think most cities have been pleasantly surprised" with the success of the facilities Guthrie says. The facilities at the Corona, Calif., skate park, have been a success as well, says Lee Stryffeler, a park planner there. 'They're used pretty much all the hours of operation, seven days a week," he says. Insurance problems - which are often cited as the reason for the failure of the first wave of skate park construction, in the 1970s - have proven surprisingly manageable. Virtually all facilities requires skaters to wear helmets and protective pads and many also make users sign waiver forms. Using government data, the American Academy of Pediatrics reports fewer people are taken to emergency rooms annually for skateboarding injuries than for activities such as bicycling or football. The boom in skate parks is unlikely to keep skaters off the rails and steps of banks, schools and other buildings, however. But it often improved relationships between skaters and police and city officials. "I love skate parks," says 11-year-old Hector, as he waits for a turn on the half-pipe at the public skating facility in Manhattan's Riverside Park. "Here, I feel welcome." ¦ & video Skaters Rave About Skate Parks http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/skateparksOl O702.html 7/2/2001 Approved July 16, 2001 ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2001 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:03 p.m. on June 18, 2001 with the following Commission Members present: Melvin Williams, Margo Danner, Joseph Bari, N. Mark Filipi, Terry Davis, Dorothy Peterson serving as Acting Chair, George Kubik, David Wright, and Richard Pletcher. Chair John Rudolph was absent. Staff present include Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jeff Asfahl, Superintendent of Recreation; Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent; Jim Storland, Water Resources Technician; C.J. Lilly, Parks Planner, Gregg Hove, City Forester, Sonya Rippe, Sports Program Supervisor, and Beth Wielde, Research and Special Project serving as Acting Recording Secretary. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Director Ken Vraa recommended an additional item under Item K, Other Business and Reports, to discuss the Lioness Lasting Legacy. Acting Chair (henceforth "Chair") Dorothy Peterson moved to approve the agenda as amended, Member Danner seconded, with all in attendance voting in favor to approve the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF May 14, 2001 Member Davis noted his presence at the last meeting, which was omitted from the first paragraph of the June 18, 2001 minutes. Member Bari moved to approve the minutes as amended, Member Kubik seconded, with all present members voting to approve the minutes as amended. Changes have been noted and corrections made 6-19-01. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION OF WALT FLETCHER Walt Fletcher was recognized by the Advisory Parks Commission for his 500 hours of volunteer service to Holz Farm's "Friends of the Farm" program. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors who wished to address the Commission under this agenda item. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS/ SUPERINTENDENT'S UPDATE Superintendent of Recreation Jeff Asfahl presented department happenings in the Recreation division. Discussion included: Concessions trailer operations. June golf program is doing well, good attendance. Co-rec tennis has strong participation this season. Fall softball and soccer information will be sent out soon. Rainy weather cancellations have occurred over the past few weeks. The Yankee Doodle Arts and Crafts Festival had approximately 10,000 visitors, very successful. Rain has caused the cancellation of many youth association sports events. Eagan has hosted seven weekend tournaments. 4 Tennis lesson enrollment has increased from '00, up to 400 this year. 4 Evening in the Park has begun; there is more information in the Discover Us brochure. 4 Wednesday morning senior activities are still going strong. 4 Youth Development programs began on May 23. 4 Planning for the multicultural festival is underway. Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 Page 2 Paula Nowariak's youth programs are underway, which serve 1,700 youth in the various programs. Member Kubik noted that the Yankee Doodle Arts and Crafts festival was well done, and offered staff favorable comments for their efforts. Superintendent Asfahl noted the efforts of Kay Gustafson, and said he would pass along the compliments to her. Superintendent Paul Olson discussed happenings in the Parks Division, including: 4 Rain has been a problem for the Parks division as well. 4 On May 31, the City held the Community Services Open House, which was well attended. 4 Parks has been working with volunteers and organizations on a variety of projects, including: - Tree Trust, to promote youth skill building. This program began at Blackhawk Park. - Eagle Scouts, who have worked on a number of projects around the community. 4 Playground equipment was ordered for Peridot Path and Cinnamon Ridge. This should be installed in July. 4 Olson attended the DOT Bicycle workshop. DOT is trying to develop a comprehensive bike map for the Twin Cities area, and used the workshop to get input from the community staff. 4 Seal coating on Northview is complete. 4 For residents who have branched down because of recent storms, Olson notified them that the City does not haul this debris unless the Council declares a citywide emergency. Olson noted that debris could be taken to the compost site on Yankee Doodle Road. For more information, residents can call the Streets Maintenance Department at 651/631-4300. CONSENT AGENDA GOPHER EAGAN Director Vraa stated that the Gopher Eagan proposal had undergone staff review. Both are consistent with dedication policies. Staff recommends approval as a consent item. Member Terry Davis moved to approve Gopher Eagan, Member Kubik seconded, with all members voting in favor to approve the consent agenda. OLD BUSINESS SKATE PARK Director Vraa introduced the Skateboard Park issue, noting that this is an update as to the project's progress, with the full report anticipated to come before the Commission in July. He introduced Researcher Wielde, who described the process undertaken for the project. She mentioned that there had been a meeting with LMC Loss Control to discuss the insurance and loss control issues that the Commission had previously identified, and proceeded to discuss the survey undertaken at two local junior high/middle schools. She noted the enthusiasm the students had demonstrated when taking the survey, and how several youth volunteered their services in the planning and design of the park. Director Vraa mentioned a meeting with Landscape Structures, who has software that can model a park within the designated budget, and that youth involvement in the process may be beneficial. He noted that dual tracking would allow a greater amount of information to go up in July. Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 Page 3 Wielde noted that preliminary findings of the survey indicate overwhelming support for the skate park project, by both boys and girls. Member Bari asked if the survey results indicated a preference for Goat Hill or Sky Hill Park. Wielde noted that the location where the surveys were taken may have impacted this, but the full findings will be presented in July and allow Commissioners to discuss the issue further. Member Davis noted that he liked the idea of dual tracking for July. Member Kubik inquired if staff had thought of bringing in a professional skater to give safety tips or training on skate park use. Wielde said that staff would take that under advisement. Chair Peterson asked if surveys were being conducted at Cascade Bay. Wielde noted that staff had discussed this, and had decided that since there was an overwhelming response at the local schools, the survey would not be conducted at Cascade Bay. NEW BUSINESS BLUE CROSS/ BLUE SHIELD Parks Superintendent Paul Olson introduced two staff of Blue Cross/ Blue Shield's real estate division to discuss the phased planning project for the Blue Cross/ Blue Shield campus. He noted that no action is required, that this item is for discussion and information. Roger Klepke of Blue Cross/ Blue Shield described the company's background and growth in Eagan and nationally, and noted that the growth has made expansion of the campus necessary. He noted recent land acquisitions and membership growth, and the strain this puts on the building. The company has been dedicated to keeping their neighbors aware of plan development. They have used an aggressive notification plan to keep neighbors up to date on the plan. Some of the concerns neighbors have had with the plan include traffic flow issues, sight line interruption, and impact to the woods and natural environment. Phase I of the plan includes Building A, and a parking ramp to avoid a great deal of surface parking. Phase II includes a second parking ramp and Building B. Phase I is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2003, and Phase II is expected to occur in 2005. Klepke noted the redirection Blue Cross Road onto a curved street the runs along the outside perimeter of the campus. He noted the planner's concern for maintaining trees and wooded areas. Member Pletcher asked about the plans for Delta Dental. Klepke said that Delta Dentals plan allows them to expand about 60,000 square feet. Member Davis asked about the parking around the proposed buildings C, D, and E. Klepke said that C was anticipated to start in 2010, that C, D, and E were long-range plans. Member Davis noted that the idea of ramps rather than surface parking was a positive thing. Klepke stated that these are in fact more expensive than surface lots, but ramps are ideal for maintaining green space and keeping employees closer to the building. Member Danner asked about ramp capacity. Klepke noted that the ramps are anticipated to hold 1,400 at the main building, and 2,200 total for buildings Main, A, and B. Member Danner asked about potential impacts on Sky Hill Park. Klepke said that there was not expected to be a great deal of impact. The plan calls for a small day care, community center, and possibly a credit union to be built nearby, and that this parking lot may serve as overflow for Sky Hill Park. Member Wright asked how many employees were currently working at the campus. Klepke said there are about 3,200 in Eagan, including the temps, part time, etc. Member Wright asked what transportation alternatives have been considered. Klepke noted that with the coming light rail, Blue Cross is looking for a light rail shuttle Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 Page 4 service. There are currently some ad hoc programs such as shuttle, ride share, and some bussing. Blue Cross is encouraged by the upcoming mass transit capabilities. Chair Peterson thanked Klepke for his presentation. Director Vraa noted the efforts by Blue Cross to be a "good neighbor" to Eagan, demonstrated by the dedication of Sky Hill Park land, field use, and efforts to work with the City. Vraa also noted that the Park System Plan has noted the future loss of Blue Cross field space. WATER RESOURCES UPDATE Water Resources Technician Jim Storland introduced the 2001 Fishing Guide, including information on lawn care, and general lake location. He showed the map that identifies quality fishing lakes (lakes that contain game fish such as walleye), and the efforts to have a quality fishing lake within one mile of every neighborhood. Storland noted that the City has reached about 75% of this goal. Storland also discussed the Cedar Pond project update, noting that most of the retaining wall has been removed along the water, 2 posts have been set up for a kiosk, and that three water gardens are planned. One will be highly manicured, one will be partially manicured, and one will be wild. Member Kubik complimented staff on the fishing guide, and said that he likes to see the catch-and-release recommendation. Chair Peterson asked about the time frame for the next phase of Cedar Pond. Director Vraa said that it would be timed with the stormwater. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS SOFTBALL UPDATE Sorts Program Supervisor Sonya Rippe described the growth of the softball program in Eagan. She discussed: 210 teams have registered for the program. Games are usually played at Northview and Lexington-Diffley fields. Fall softball is gearing up already. Funding is available from league fees, costs range from $395 to $590, depending on whether there are double-headers. Fall fees are lower because fall programs are less formalized. Description of the different types of teams, such as men's, women's, co-rec, corporate, etc. The number of teams has increased, as have the number of games played. Rippe sees a correlation between this. There is a decline in the number of men's corporate registrations. There is some reorganization underway to try to bring the numbers back up. Schedules and standings are available on eteamz.com. The site has already received 5,300 hits. Rippe noted a decline in the number of teams playing, which is a statewide trend. Teams want more games, though, which presents a logistical challenge for staff. It would entail reduction in the number of teams to add games. Rippe believes it would be better to keep the league numbers the same and increase the number of games played. Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 Page 5 Goals for the program include changing the Men's D games to double-headers, and since the field locations for night games are limited, look in to additional lights. Chair Peterson asked how these goals could be met. Rippe noted that lighting allows games to be played later and in less favorable weather conditions. Chair Peterson asked how pervasive the desire for double headers is. Rippe said that it was a combination of recreational and competitive requests. Rippe demonstrated the eteamz.com web page, how players can get information on scores and schedules not only for softball, but also for several other sports. Member Davis asked if there was a link through the City web site, which Rippe said there was. Member Davis asked if other cities were using this, but Rippe wasn't aware of any at the present. She described the dot.com mergers that have put the system in flux for a while, which is not calmed down. Chair Peterson asked if there was a cost for the City to use the site. Rippe said that cost was minimal, virtually none. Chair Peterson thanked Rippe for her presentation. GRANDFATHER TREE PROJECT UPDATE Director Vraa introduced Gregg Hove to describe the Grandfather Tree moving project. Hove presented the tree project from its earliest planning to the recent move. Hove acknowledged the work of the Eagan Foundation and Kay Gustafson. He described the phases of the moving effort, including consultant selection, fund raising, the 9 day transplant process, that the monitoring and follow-up. The steps for the actual transplant, as shown in Hove's presentation, are: 1. Dig the 30' root ball, checking for major root configurations. The tree had good soils around it. 2. Excavation of the soil, by machine and by hand. 3. Put layers of burlap and wire around the root structure to hold root soils in place. 4. Irrigation and monitoring systems to keep soil moist. 5. Preparation of exit ramp. 6. Transplant soils from old site to new. 7. 7" X 40' pipe inserted under root ball by hammer hoe. 8. Laying of I-beams under and across the pipe. 9. Preparation of hydraulic systems. 10. Gantry system set up, including bungees on the hydraulics. 11. Setup of wood roadway. 12. Put track system in place. 13. Raising of the tree, backing the trailer under the tree. 14. Moving the tree with 2 D-5 bulldozers pushing it, and excavators steering. 15. Re-set the gantry system at the new site. 16. Reverse the order- put the tree in its new foundation. 17. Back fill around the tree, remove burlap and wires layers. 18. Complete the backfill. Follow up care includes application of organic mulch, monitoring the site drainage, digging a stormwater root canal, applying root stimulator, and monitoring infa-red aerphotos for changes in coloration. Member Kubik asked if the soil density is the same after backfill. Gregg Hove noted that they use a pay loader to dump the soil, and then water it so it settles naturally. Member Kubik asked about the drip line, and Hove said it was about 45'. Any more than a 30' root ball, and National Shade would have to increase the cost of the move. They were pleased to find that 30' was enough. Member Kubik asked if there was a slide presentation available on the Web. Hove said that they have been tracking the project on the web. Kubik asked is it would be likely that Hove would share his experiences in an academic paper or presentations. Hove anticipates this. Member Kubik noted that this project is leading edge for both the private and public sectors. Member Peterson Advisory Parks Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2001 Page 6 inquired as to how people would be kept away from the critical site during the upcoming large celebrations and festivals. Hove said that the tree would be fenced off, and there may be an information booth set up. LIONESS LASTING LEGACY Member Margo Danner described the efforts of the Lioness group to sell engraved bricks for a donor plaza at the upcoming Community Center. She mentioned that during the sale, efforts would be made to locate the oldest living Eagan resident, and the oldest existing business in Eagan. Director Vraa described the location and features of the proposed donor plaza, and how it is unique to the Community Center. Member Kubik asked if it was permissible to give out a contact number. Member Danner said to contact Judy Stewart of the Eagan Lioness at 651/ 454-4747. ROUND TABLE Member Davis noted that this might be an appropriate time to deal with some of the open issues as seen on the attendance roster. Member Kubik added that it might be appropriate to have some of the subcommittees working on these issues before bringing them before the Commission. Chair Peterson said it was a good idea to send these to subcommittee first. The Commission went through the items individually: 1. Commission Review Workshop- STRIKE ITEM 2. Spring Maintenance Demonstration- ACCOMPLISHED DURING TOUR 3. Review revenue sources in lieu of park dedication- ACQUISITION & DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE 4. Review docks- STRIKE 5. Seasonal easement at top of Trapp Farm tubing hill- MOOT- Superintendent Paul Olson mentioned that insurance contact recommended not extending the easement. 6. Wetland and Setback Buffers- NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE 7. Workshop to review packet format/ content- STRIKE Chair Peterson requested that the "Morning After" memos be included in the packet. She also recommended that meeting dates be set up for the two subcommittee meetings. Member Kubik deferred the meeting setup to staff. Member Davis said that perhaps these items could come before the Commission in September. Director Vraa agreed. Member Davis told the Commission about an article he had seen during a trip to San Diego in USA Today, regarding a bond used to purchase acreage for green space conservation. Member Filipi noted that the City of Plymouth has done a similar thing, although not on such a large scale. ADJOURNMENT Member Kubik moved to adjourn, Member Danner seconded, with all members voting in favor to adjourn at 8:55 pm. Secretary