01/10/2000 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Monday January 10, 2000
7:00 PM
Eagan Municipal Center
City Council Chambers
A. 7:00 PM Regular Meeting 7:00 pm
B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:02 pm
C. Approval of Agenda 7:03 pm
D. Award of Appreciation - Lee Markell and Bonnie Karson 7:04 pm
E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 16, 1999 7:09 pm
F. Visitors to be Heard 7:10 pm
G. Department Happenings Pages 3-4 7:11 pm
H. Consent Agenda 7:15 pm
(1) Goetz First Addition - Daniel & Deborah Goetz Pages 5-8
H. Development Proposals
1. Old Business
(1) Murphy Farm 3d Addition Pages 9-20 7:16 pm
J. New Business
(1) Cedarvale Task Force Update Enclosure 7:45 pm
K. Parks and Recreation Update 8:00 pm
L. Water Resources Update 8:05 pm
M. Other Business and Reports
(1) Trail User Survey Pages 21-23 8:10 pm
(2) Subcommittee Updates 8:30 pm
(3) Set Recreation Subcommittee Meeting 8:35 pm
(4) Commission Evaluation Pages 25-29 8:36 pm
(5) Communications Pages 31-32 8:40 pm
N. Round Table 8:42 pm
0. Adjournment 8:45 pm
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities, and
employment without regard to race, color, creed religion national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation,
or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request
at least 96 hours in advance of the event. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received the City will attempt to provide the aids.
6:00 p.m. Moonshine?Wk?fw ning Meeting
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
1999 MEETING SCHEDULE
NAME Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec )an
11 15 19 17 14 19 16 20 18 15 16 10
Joseph Bari X x X X X X X X X X X
Terry Davis 0* X X X X X X 0* X X X
N.Mark Filipi x X X X X 0 X X 0* X X
Kevin Gutknecht x X X X 0 X 0 X X X 0
Barbara Johnson vice Chair x X X X X X X 0* X X X
Robert Kane, Jr. (Alternate) X X 0* X O* X X X X X X
Bonnie Karson Secrerary x X 0* X 0* O* X X X X X
George Kubik x x x x x x x X X 0* X
Lee Markell chair x x x x x x x x x x X
Daryle Petersen x x X 0* X X X 0* X X X
John Rudolph x X X X X X X X X X 0
Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee
Joseph Bari
Kevin Gutknecht N.Mark Filipi Terry Davis
Robert Kane, Jr. George Kubik Daryle Petersen Barbara Johnson
John Rudolph Bonnie Karson
Lee Markell
UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES
December 28, 1999......5:00 p.m. Murphy Farm 3rd Addition 1. Commission Review Workshop
Tree Mitigation Fund Review 2. Spring Maintenance Demonstration
January 10, 2000.........6:00 p.m. Moonshine Park Planning Meeting 3. Recognition of Sharon Holbeck
4. Review revenue sources In lieu of park dedication
5. Review Docks
6. Naming Holz Lake (check if named)
7. Seasonal easement at top of Trapp Farm tubing hill.
8. Wetland and Setback Buffers
a4'
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: MOONSHINE PARK REVIEW COMMITTEE
FROM: C.J. LILLY - PARKS PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE: JANUARY 7, 2000
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SCHEDULE
BACKGROUND
This planning project is divided into four phases. The objective for each phase is as follows:
FIRST PHASE: Develop a refined concept plan.
SECOND PHASE: Develop a park master plan.
THIRD PHASE: Acquire adjacent properties or easements as needed.
FOURTH PHASE: Prepare construction plans and specifications.
The time required to complete the first phase is six months. At this time it is too early to predict
how long the other phases will take. However, by the end of phase one, the general scope of the
proposed park improvements should be more obvious and the associated review schedule more
clear.
The first meeting is scheduled for Monday, January 10 before the January Commission Meeting.
Please meet upstairs in the Conference Room. The meeting will begin promptly at 6 p.m. and will
adjourn at 6:45 p.m.
PHASE 1: PROPOSED SCHEDULE - JANUARY TO JUNE 2000
1. JANUARY - Historic background, review of existing conditions.
2. FEBRUARY - Site analysis, identify key program elements.
3. MARCH - Preliminary concept plan development.
4. APRIL - Public meeting to evaluate concept plans.
5. MAY - Prioritize key concept plan elements.
6. JUNE - Develop a refined concept plan.
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 6, 2000
SUBJECT: JANUARY 10 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
Prior to the regular meeting, the Moonshine Park planning meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. in
Conference Rooms 2 A & B. A brief cover memo is enclosed from CJ Lilly regarding that meeting.
The regular meeting will begin with an award presentation to Lee Markell and Bonnie Karson in
appreciation of their years of involvement with the Advisory Parks Commission. They have been an
active and vital part of the Commission and will certainly be missed.
The Goetz First Addition is the only Consent Agenda item and there are no other new development
proposals to review. The Murphy Farm 3d Addition, however, has returned as an Old Business item,
which will require further discussion as well as a recommendation relative to Lot 18. A memo is
included reviewing the issues and the discussion that occurred at the workshop with the Land
Acquisition sub-committee, developer and staff on December 28.
Assistant City Administrator Jamie Verbrugge will make a presentation of the redevelopment concept
for the Cedar/13 Redevelopment Area. Copies of the report are included for your review.
Following staff updates, Superintendent Paul Olson will be presenting a report on a trail user survey
done in 1999. The report compares this most recent survey with ones conducted in 1981, 1989 and
1990 in an attempt to identify users needs and concerns.
Also enclosed for your information is a letter from David Kennedy along with a resolution of
appreciation to the Advisory Parks Commission and City Council from the Board of Directors of
Caponi Art Park. The meeting will conclude with Subcommittee Updates, Commission Evaluation and
Round Table.
As usual, should you not be able to attend the meeting, please let us know prior to the meeting by
calling 681-4661.
Respectfully submitted,
Ken Vraa
1.
Department Happenings
January 2000
1 Despite record warm temperatures several skating sites were open during the Christmas/New Year holiday
period. The sliding hill at Trapp Farm Park was also open during the brief snow cover period. Staff is
continuing with an intensified effort to provide quality ice.
2. The renovation of the garage space at the art house to allow for its use as a classroom is complete. City staff
completed the framing, insulation, sheet rocking, window installation, plumbing, ceiling finishing, and
priming. A contractor was used for all electrical work and a volunteer crew from Home Depot completed
the painting. Many of the materials were donated from local vendors on provided by the art council.
3. All park facilities including the rental houses came through the Y2K event with no noticeable problems.
4. The city has renewed its contract with Life Works Inc. The program utilizes challenged adults to provide
building cleaning services. Thus will be the 10& year of entering into a similar contract. The department
utilizes the services of Life Works to, supplement the cleaning of a variety of park buildings.
5. Staff has received council authorization to submit a Metro Greenways Planning Grant application to the
department of Natural Resources for funding to assist with the development of a management plan for
Patrick Eagan Park. If the city is successful in obtain a grant, work on the project would most likely begin
in 2001. The grant program is very competitive because of limited funding. A similar grant requested from
the city in 1999 was not successful.
6. Staff has begun the process of ordering equipment approved in the year 2000 capital improvement program
(C.I.P) acquisitions this year include replacements for 2 trucks, 2 mowers, the brush chipper and a trailer.
Due to the city's comprehensive maintenance program the trade values of the equipment being replaced is
very high.
7. The Water Resources Division is monitoring concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the nine (9)
waterbodies for which it has permits to aerate this winter. Thus far, however, no aerators have been
installed because DO concentrations are close to saturation, which is well above the minimum "trigger"
concentration of 5 parts per million (ppm). . When DO concentrations remain abnormally high during this
time of year due to late formation of ice and minimal snow cover.
8. Last week, Water Resources Technician Jim Storland attended a 2-day training in ArcView, the industry-
standard computer program of geographic information systems. With hands-on experience over the coming
months, Jim will help to improve the technical capability of the Water Resources Division to present and
analyze water quality data---one of the division's 2000 work goals.
9. Next week, the Water Resources Division will join other partners to recognize volunteers of the 1999
Dakota County Wetland Health Evaluation Project, a joint research and educational effort that gathers
biological data on wetlands. The project is a collaboration between local units of government, educators,
citizen volunteers, Dakota County Environmental Education Program, a wetland consulting firm, Dodge
Nature Center, Hennepin County Parks, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The Dakota County
Environmental Education Program began the project in 1997 and continues to coordinate it. In 1999, 80
citizens monitored wetland in 10 communities. Volunteers gather data on aquatic macroinvertebrates and
vegetation to determine rankings of wetland quality. This data has potential use by local governments
making decisions about protecting wetlands. Funding for the 1999-2001 project was approved by the
Minnesota Legislature, 1999 Minnesota Laws Ch. 231, sec. 16, Subd. 12d, as recommended by the
Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources from the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources
Trust Fund.
3.
10. A new 2000 Eagan Fishing Guide has been updated to include basic information about nine priority lakes in
the city. Each year, 1000 copies of the popular manual are published and available to the public at no
charge.
11. The Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District has begun the process of restoring about 26.5
acres of wetland in Eureka Township for deposit into the state wetland system. The City of Eagan has
committed finds to acquire 3.5 acres of the restored wetland for wetland banking credits. Assuming the
Eureka Township Board next month approves the restoration plan, construction will occur in May/June of
2000. Wetland credits from the project would be available no sooner than the end of this year.
12. The "Skatin New Years Eve" party was a big hit. 120 people enjoyed open skating, pizza, popcorn, pop,
and hot chocolate. The event concluded with an early countdown at 9:45p.m.
13. School's out events during winter break were a big hit. On December 28, 22 participants enjoyed a
beautiful winter day at Trapp Farm Park (one of the few days of snow) Tubing, snow games, and a BBQ
down in the Pavilion rounded out the day. On Wednesday, December 28, 50 youth participated in Holiday
Hoopla. Craft projects and an Ice Cream party were on the agenda.
14. Winter preschool programs began on January 3. Goat Hill Park, Bridle Ridge Park, and Rahn Park are the
sites. Close to 200 children ages 2-5 are registered this winter session.
15. Winter adult leagues began the week of January 3td. In all, 21 leagues will run this winter session.
16. Phone calls are already being fielded for summer softball. Information about the 2000 season will be
available the beginning of February.
I
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 5, 2000
SUBJECT: GOETZ FIRST ADDITION - DANIEL & DEBORAH GOETZ
BACKGROUND
Daniel and Deborah Goetz are requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval to allow the creation of a two lot
single family subdivision entitled "Goetz First Addition". The proposed subdivision overlays approximately
5.0 acres of land located south of Deerwood Drive east of Denmark Avenue in the southwest'/. of Section
22.
In conjunction with the requested preliminary subdivision, the applicant has also requested a rezoning of the
property from an A, Agriculture to an R-1, Residential Single Family zoning designation (to allow further
subdivision).
The property in question is currently unplatted and is occupied by an unsewered, single family residence.
Specifically, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 4.1 and 0.6 acre parcels. It is the intent
of the applicant to ultimately construct a new home upon proposed Lot 1.
The site contains both varied topography and mature vegetation. Two wetland exist on site, one within the
western one half of proposed Lot 1 and the other in the extreme southeast corner of proposed Lot 2.
This item is scheduled for consideration at the January 25 Advisory Planning Commission.
PARKS AND TRAILS DEDICATION
This proposal would be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication for the newly created
Lot 1.
TREE PRESERVATION
This site is located at 1260 Deerwood Drive. The site is heavily wooded with a variety of deciduous
trees. The proposed Lot I is entirely tree covered with oak trees (red and white oaks). There is
considerable elevation drop within this .59 acre lot, sloping down to the west, with a pond located in
the northeast corner of this lot.
A tree inventory has been submitted for this application (lot 1). It indicates that there are thirty (30)
significant trees located within the lot. These red and white oaks range in diameters from 6" to 21
averaging about 15".
l
As proposed, development within lot I will result in the removal of 3 significant trees (10% of the
total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance, allowable removal for this type of
development (single family residential) is set at 20%. Therefore, with a proposed removal less than
allowable limits, there is no mitigation applied to this application. However, as is the case with all
proposed single family residential applications, tree preservation requirements will be again considered
at the time of building permit application.
The Commission may want to consider the following action:
¦ To acknowledge that an individual lot tree preservation plan will be required for lot I at the
time of building permit application.
• To require that Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene
laminate safety netting) be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root
Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
To require that the applicant contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction
site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure
compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection
Fencing.
WATER QUALITY /WETLANDS
This proposed .59 acre single-family subdivision is located in the Fish lake basin. Similar to other residential
developments, regardless of size, the new home will generate additional stormwater runoff within the city.
Because this development is small, however, on-site treatment of stormwater for water quality purposes is
not practical. Nevertheless, in accordance with the policies the City has had in place since 1990, the
development is responsible for a cash dedication equal to the cost of the land and pond volume needed to
reduce phosphorus export to undeveloped conditions.
About on half of an estimated 6800 square foot wetland is located in the northwest corner of this parcel. A
minimum distance of 56 feet is planned between the proposed house and the wetland No filling or draining
of the wetland is proposed
Staff recommends that this development be responsible for a water quality cash dedication in lieu of on-site
pondmg.
FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication for the
newly created Lot 1.
2. Acknowledge that an individual lot tree preservation plan will be required for Lot I at the time of
building permit application.
3. Require that Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate
safety netting) be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is
greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
4. Require that the applicant contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection
at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree
Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
5. This development shall be responsible for a water quality cash dedication in lieu of on site ponding.
Z
o w
w
-op WA?F
f I 1. 1
CL.
co
cRii
ca w r. t Jig ? ` ? \ \ / i /
cm let
4.: :4:! - - - - 'ti=.: 'mot.. "~.:aSr :•i•'
C03.- _
O x: o 7C T;
2 \ ~ -x
Won j _ - , A O r:. ,IL' Z Z'~• .r'"' : ;
'4 .4 c? ( _ .;rte
4 t^t~ T11{? ~0 r s Sr. A `Y • YJ t s~ +1S 3
4! _ a• 2 7
Iii - } 0•P?~~ 4. Yi,J, ` Z; ^ ;r <
` t '+w: z O. ~ ¦ • N. f 4''V .:tom I •I L° 4 "
'O Ski a -
o ~ - Y'fi N _
480
r.,
_
1~ -
•~~a~ ~rinta3a '~?j ' . _ x A- z UTILITY PLAN
, s •e. W - yam.
06
g ~ F
N X.ay qty S~
W 0 ~ ~ ~7i 5N N
i r e h
a $ x i ;
C-Al
fit
J
1
cn
LL.
1 a Q
ci
O W
W
O W iw
= WO
AA 91 31 .0 1 00 31 • - .
- ;-s
16
I ~O
! V. i. ~ A W
71• N ~ Y.
iNN - +p N N v°o•
or,
- a
1-0011
Ina
81 gal
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
. MEMO
city of eagan
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 5, 2000
SUBJECT: RAY MILLER - REZONING/PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
(MURPHY FARM 3'm ADDITION)
REQUEST
1. A Rezoning of approximately 12.7 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located
north of Murphy Parkway and east of Donegal Way in the northwest 1 /4 of Section 21.
2. A Preliminary Subdivision (Murphy Farm 3`d Addition), of the subject property into 25 single-
family residential lots.
3. A Variance to allow a parcel of land (proposed Lot 18) with less than 85 feet of width at the front
setback line.
FACTS
> The 12.7-acre property in question currently overlays two individual parcels of land each occupied
by a single-family residence. Specifically, the property overlays Lots 19 and 20, Block 2 of the
Murphy Farm subdivision which was platted in the summer of 1997.
> The site has a topographic difference of over 80 feet from the southwest to the northeast. The
northeastern portion of the subject site holds both significant vegetation and slopes. Some mature
vegetation also exists in the south central area of the site. No wetlands exist on the property.
> At their regular meeting on December 16, 1999, the Advisory Parks Commission considered the
Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision. The developer stated that this item would appear on the
January 4 City Council agenda. The Commission was particularly concerned about Lot 18 and the
impact its development would have on the entrance to Blackhawk Park through the elimination of
trees on park property as well as this particular lot.
? The Commission requested, and the developer agreed, to have a workshop session on December 28
to look at options for this property, including the potential for acquisition of a portion of the
property.
? At their regular meeting on December 21, 1999, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public
hearing to consider the Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision (including the lot width variance)
and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes.
Lf
ISSUES
Resident Concerns
At the Advisory Planning Commission hearing, area residents voiced concern over the potential traffic
related impacts of the development upon Donegal Way. The preliminary subdivision calls for seven
single-family lots to access Donegal Way via a cul-de-sac connection.
APrC Concerns
The primary concern of the APrC related to the "flag lot" configuration of Lot 18 and the tree loss
associated with the lot's development. In response to these concerns, an APrC subcommittee was
established to discuss various alternatives to resolve the concerns.
Street A Configuration
Condition #6 of the planning report states that "Street A" should be re-aligned in order to retain
significant trees presently located near Lots 14 and 15. Upon further review by the City Forester and
the developer's engineer, it has been determined that such realignment is not possible due to lot depth
limitations.
DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
On December 28, 1999, the APrC subcommittee met with the developer and discussed three primary
development options related to proposed Lot 18. A summary of these alternatives is provided below
followed by a discussion of associated issues.
Alternative A - Existing Plan (see Exhibit A)
Summary: Accept the plan (and the configuration of Lot 18) as originally proposed (Exhibit A).
Discussion: Concerns related to the present configuration of Lot 18 have been previously documented
in the APrC minutes. The long roadway to the home disturbs a significant woodland, is at a grade of
10% for over 100 feet which raises concerns for winter driving and the potential risk for park users.
The Commission was also concerned about the hydrant construction along the road access to the park.
Finally, there was concern for the visual impact of the road and house itself to Blackhawk Park.
Alternative B - Reconfiguration of Lot 18 (see Exhibits B 1, 2 and 3)
Summary Alternative B (proposed by the developer) would reconfigure Lot 18 in a manner intended
to minimize tree loss. As shown on Exhibits B 1, 2 and 3, the driveway for Lot 18 has been shifted to
the west resulting in the expansion of the area between the driveway and the adjacent Blackhawk Park.
The expanded area is intended to create a vegetative buffer. As part of this alternative, the applicant
has also proposed to establish a conservation easement. Attached as Exhibit C is a drawing prepared
by City staff showing a potential conservation easement area. The developer would relocate the fire .
hydrant and all utilities within the driveway access to the home and the road is now proposed to be 12
feet in width and within an area of no more then 20' in width.
The developer has also proposed the establishment of private covenants related to the house such as
color and size. While such performance standards cannot be enforced by the City's subdivision
requirements, they are intended to lessen the visual impact of the development of Lot 18 for the
neighbors and park users.
The expansion of the lot width eliminates the need for a variance.
/J
Discussion: Commission members present at the meeting of December 28 saw this plan as a
significant improvement over the original plan. There is still some concern that the developer will be
able to keep construction of the road and the placement of utilities within such a small area. Residents
at the meeting expressed concern that the visual impact is still there with Lot 18. Residents responded
that the conservation easements and restriction of the size of the foot print of the home were important
considerations in order to maintain the character of the area, if the lot had to be developed.
Alternative C - City's acquisition of a portion of Lot 18 (see Exhibit D)
Summary; A third alternative would involve City acquisition of a portion of Lot 18 for the purpose of
preservation and protection of Blackhawk Park/neighborhood views. As shown conceptually on
Exhibit D, the City would acquire the northeast portion of Lot 18 with the balance being added to
adjacent Lots 11 through 14.
The sales price of Lot 18, or any portion of it, has been set by the developer at $90,000-100,000 in
order for the development to move ahead.
Discussion: Acquisition of a portion of the lot would preserve the viewshed of the area, trees, and the
perspective to the entrance to Blackhawk Park. Concern has been expressed for the location of the
home on Lot 18 and how the house would "stand out" in comparison to the existing homes surrounding
Blackhawk Park. The cost for acquisition of this property seems relatively high given that enlargement
of the adjacent lots and the removal of a driveway behind the homes on Lots 12, 13 and 14 enhances
their value. Funding for the acquisition would have to come form the park site acquisition and
development fund. Based on a cost of $90,000 for all or a portion of Lot 18, acquisition of the
portion identified in Exhibit D (25,490 square feet) would calculate to $3.53 per square foot.
FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
This item is scheduled to be reviewed by the City Council at their January 14, 2000 meeting. The
Commission will need to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding which alternative they
feel would be most appropriate for this development.
l1
T QT •.'I IM 33MS'
\ . ~,-Tr~ ' III
41
i%t";
~y , i/l iii/'f~ /i/i J// /f
Vii" 1 6 \ \ ll{\ //yf9~~`~~' I
A(VI
N All
%
It. 1
%
All 1
mgm • ! i ij
all
TA
sit
218; M/MNr .IW i0
a~ GD~G PL
nua me F1 ooTrnio~ B RW -ray .a • e.a
OMMTA OOI Af Y. MI OTA AtNtatsawoaEaioii aarwN _ _ _ rs
OOY'T. LOT 2 I /
/ q +I(,~I
did
xm
c-
Wei_ MWSr4M MM
it
- \Z
4F." its
Imo- - '
¦co I
I 1C , , InILI /
lei
J I II A- i
tV r Yom'
u i
solar
%
4 ~
f 11P
11F ,
i
"~as~wtia` a
r P J tt
awMaso /y
IrL F f'
I
P M 1 PUT of.,
'~i. ,MA
M ADDITION Aowr ma
aSLSIM YIlIV Sm .
ra IOS6~~
? iisiM iiiiiss..i tiisiiis
7-9r .
! / III III y IIII - _ ? 1~1 / A
11 III I~I J_-
JIL
- - - - -J
S
N 1b
WIF
Ao 19r
god
I' y: I 6 1
. IV
I \ ?X,Y, ,,f rte,.
eee ~ ~ c~l~E~
000
E EE•
/4, 111
I IOasY W~ e1.y tr PWA eua O{D tr. so .asea
M/MNr FANI ~Ip A00111p1 nor~„e a U~ oe Iota n
n ,s a u°a an am ,salts,
AIO l7q.Q, 00„R~ B R W , say - aN, w a~a w
,rw x ,dx s uemn
an Or Dam fawn 6 a" R ALOE OOY ft - UM6
DAKOTA OOWfl I I OTA ~aw®a~aaEagt)ooMhwy ,s~tw
MOD
ML• rrALb
r 5 2000"
W CFIVFD
if ~`4 ,ow ~ \ F
t
110
M 010 ~r ~ rr
al w 1 IF • E E 6
imp
"a I Fir F_
GIICAL Mal ZOME °I
~T°°iao° ` G . MI.SZ.:
R
7
89.1 so
V W Is
IMM
-ftft
77
Y - ? f 11 i
117' wl~•`_x ~ t12 it
t rr x r !
11 nT I I, 1 !
`4tl11CAl'1100T-mf 1. , (`I ~
N I b L'.+Y 1 r
N7
YYY- ' I
I EM
* a 1
1 1 ! S y. M
i T ha s ~ ONflCI AL IIOOf ZOIK
a ! ( / : /ice
713
iE SIGNIFICANT TREE REMOVED
W SIGNIFICANT TREE TO REMAIN L
TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES - 514
TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES TO BE REMOVED - 156
PERCENT REMOVED - 30.4X
ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL - 40X
(TWO PHASE CONSTRUCTION 25X PLUS
6 8
L L _j t:
T_ L N89'32'47'E 36. • 1 ' _.:.,i' " u t 'p • 4 •
7 r !0.9! 110.{7 tai. t0 • . . 'C1nP~ k'.
soo'or»w--
;,'f'' r. 4147 41.35 ?°r;? ' ti ' 37.26-•::; • \ _ \
r___ w ttP a~ e N yr ? B
47.77 CA u
I
131.6! 0£-- 01 .'Lay. y
111.61 60.95 LCD
16276 ,aa
C19
J I go I~~ C71 t° r 60 ' aaaee r~
]NEGAL
BURT >E i 1 e V \
60.9 1./1 1 +
144.96 H A
/ of
u1.75 ~q y- $ »e.. STREET 1/ zsnee /
v
6ae1
110.02
\ iy _ 16.72__ ~ ~ ~ ~ nom
41 W 8 N ° p ~ : le Vy b =
`°A - x ~ ' _ ~ N E V / I • / / /vv `v ~ ~ • fil- r1jr e
~ i
*00 WO
1,U
\ 1
am Log Or wtpvwV.. M. lr. n. ML 23
V. KUL 2.3
CF/r1r `A
'
PARK.
r_
?ee
mm -
~ i3e6ii~??
H-1 2A s i.sBciio ~E"~•..
j
$ p
M.n. 2 We I.
1.3
14
12 15
44 640 SQ. FT. PARK-
r• •
11
MURPHY FARM 10
3RD ADDITION o 60 _ ZO Sao
ScAi-E 1 INCH 60 FLET
Page 2
December 21. 1999 bR4Fr
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION-RAY MILLER
Chair Heyl opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a rezoning of
approximately 12.73 acres from A (agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary
Subdivision (Murphy Farm 3'd Addition) to create 25 single family lots, legally described at Lots
19 and 20, Block 2, Murphy farm, located north of Murphy Parkway and east of Donegal Way in
the NW 1/4 of Section 21.
Planner Kirmis introduced this item. Mr. Kirmis highlighted the information presented in
City staffs planning report dated December 16, 1999. Mr. Kirmis noted the background and
history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. Mr. Kirmis
highlighted two concerns of the development, namely, the length of the driveway for Lot 18 and
the current alignment of Street "A," which could be realigned to save significant trees. Mr.
Kirmis further stated that Condition 10 of the Report should be amended to indicate that a cash
dedication is required for the trailway rather than requiring the developer to construct the trial
along Murphy Parkway from the entrance to Blackhawk Park to Donegal Way.
The applicants representative, Ray Miller, noted his presence.
Jan Johnson, President of the Murphy Farm Homeowner's Association spoke concerning
traffic concerns as a result of the seven lots that will access Donegal Way. Another resident
expressed concern about the length of the driveway for Lot 18.
Chair Heyl closed the public hearing.
In response to an inquiry from Chair Heyl, John Gorder, Design Development Engineer,
responded to inquiries concerning traffic on Donegal Way. Members Steininger, Frank and
Miller discussed the design of the street layout.
Member Frank moved, Member Steininger seconded, a motion to recommend approval of
the rezoning of the property from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family), residential single
family zoning designation.
All voted in favor.
Member Frank moved, Steininger seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a
preliminary subdivision allowing the creation of a 25-lot single family residential subdivision
entitled "Murphy Farm Third Addition" and consisting of 12.7 acres of land located north of the
Murphy Parkway and East of Donegal Way in the NW of Section 21, subject to the following
conditions:
Page 3
December 21, 1999
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
1. The property shall be platted.
2. The City shall approve a variance to allow Lot 18 to have a width of less than 85
feet at the front setback line.
3. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as
adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B1, Cl, Dl, El
4. A vehicle guardrail shall be constructed at the time of building permit for Lot 18
along the south edge of the driveway in the area of the retaining wall.
5. The following lot modifications shall be made:
> The area of Lot 19 shall be expanded from 11,997 to 12,000 square feet
> The widths of Lot 4 and Lot 6 shall be expanded from 82 and 84 feet respectively
to 85 feet
6. "Street A" shall be realigned such that significant trees near Lots 14 and 15 may
be retained.
7. Existing well and septic systems on the site shall be abandoned in accordance
with County and City requirements.
8. The developer shall construct the hydrant lead pipe to serve Lot 18 entirely within
the development site.
9. The sanitary sewer service for Lot 18 shall be constructed as a pump and forced
pipe system with adequate depth to reduce the potential for freezing.
10. Cash trailway dedication payment is required prior to the issuance of any building
permit.
It. Individual tree preservation plans will be required for lots 1-3, 5, 7-16, 18, 21-24.
12. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene
laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the
perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant
trees/woodlands to be preserved.
13. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-
construction site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading
permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and
placement of the tree protection fencing.
December 21. 1999
Page 4 I)RAPT
ADVISORY Y PLA LANNING COMMISSION 14. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for 40 percent of the
area (5.1 acres) of this development.
All voted in favor.
PLANNED D VELOPMENT AMENDMENT-HONEY E LTD.
Chair Heyl opened th ext public hearing of the evening reg ding a request to amend a
Planned Development to allow uilding signage on the north, so and east elevations of the
building at 4510 Erin Drive in the W of Section 30.
Planner Dudziak introduced item. Ms. Dudziak hi ighted the information presented
in City staffs planning report dated Dec ber 16, 1999. M Dudziak noted the background and
history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions o e subject property.
The applicant was not present. No one om th audience addressed the APC.
Chair Heyl closed the public hearing.
Discussion occurred regarding the apputnanc of signage on the east elevation.
Member Frank moved, Member Tilled seconded, a otion to recommend approval of an
amendment of the Planned Development Agreement to allow building signage on the north and
south elevations of the building located at 4510 Erin Drive ~ki the SW 1/4 of Section 30 with a
condition that there be no signage on the, east elevation of the building.
All voted in favor, with the following conditions:
1. An Agreement amending the Planned Development sh 1 be executed and
recorded at the DaCota County recorder's office.
2. A sign permit for each sign is required prior to installation.
3. There shall be no signage on the east elevation of the building.\
All voted in favor.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION-MENDOTA HOMES
Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding the request for a
Preliminary Subdivision to divide the common property for Oakwood Heights Condominiums to
establish a separate ownership of the property and a separate association, for the seven-unit
building being constructed on the north of the two existing buildings.
2.
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
FROM: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation
Paul Olson, Superintendent of Parks
DATE: January 6, 2000
SUBJECT: Trail Use Survey
Background
Since 1980 the number of off road trail miles within the City of Eagan has more than doubled to a current total in
excess of 100. As the trail system has evolved, several surveys have been conducted to monitor trends in usership.
The most recent having been completed in the early fall of 1999. With recorded references to a survey conducted in
1981, nearly 20 years of data is now available for review.
In addition to the surveys of 1981 and 1999 surveys were conducted in 1989 and 1990. The surveys of 1989, 1990
and 1999 were "on trail" surveys conducted by Park Division interns. They generally consisted of both interviews
and first hand observation. The interviews were generally intended to evaluate the reasons for use and user
satisfaction while the observations measured the overall levels of specific types of use. The trail survey conducted in
1981 appears to have been a component of a larger community wide mail in survey. Because the format of each of
the surveys was different the development of accurate statistical comparison is difficult however, the results can be
used to evaluate general trends.
The specific methodology of the 1999 survey was similar to those completed in 1989 and 1990. Several trail
locations were selected for on site monitoring. The sites selected were considered to be representative of the general
trail types found throughout the City, ranging from lessor traveled residential sections to high use commercial areas.
Three time intervals were selected for monitoring to maximize the number of users identified and to provide a more
accurate user profile. Approximately 60.5 hours was spent conducting the survey including a weekend session.
1999 Survey
Survey Period: August 4, 1999 - August 25, 1999
Survey Locations: - Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle - Johnny Cake and Cliff
- Deerwood and Blackhawk - Lexington and Wescott
Time intervals: 6am -10am
11am-2pm
4pm - 8pm
8am-fpm (Saturday)
Each location was surveyed at each time interval.
GENERALIZED RESULTS
OBSERVED USE
1989, 1990, 1999 results are based upon first hand observation
1981 results are based upon written responses
Use
Year 1981 1989 1990 1999
Bicycling 72% 49% 37% 45%
Walking 15% 37% 54% 33%
Running 8% 8% 19%
In Line(*) 3%
Other 13% 6% 1% 0%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100%
• Total Observed N/A 475 302 806
"In-Line" was first listed as a specific use in the 1999 survey
"Other" included skateboards, "roller skates," wheelchairs and motorized carts
REASON FOR USING TRAILS
1989, 1990, 1999 results are based upon first hand interviews
Reason For Use
Year 1981 1989 1990 1999
Exercise N/A 41% 36% 50%
Recreation N/A 18% 11% 15%
Transportation N/A 18% 17% 17%
Combination
Recreation/Exercise N/A 23% 35% 18%
TOTAL N/A 100% 100% 100%
• Total # Interviewed N/A 156 101 130
The reason for use pertained only to that specific event at the time of the interview
-1J 2
2
I COMMENTS FROM INTERVIEWS
1989 1990 1999
• Plow trails in the winter • Plow trails in the winter • Plow trails in the winter
• Add more trails • Add more trails • Add more trails
- Cliff Road - Pilot Knob - Dodd Road
- Rahn Road - Cliff Road - Cliff Road
- Diffley Road • Cross walks • Sweep more often
- Blackhawk • Curb cuts needed
• More signage i.e. maps
• Controls at intersections
• Curb cuts needed
Conclusions
Because of differences in the methodology used in each survey it is difficult to draw specific
collective conclusions. However, the commonalties in each survey can be utilized to identify trends
in trail use which may be valuable in planning, designing and maintaining trail corridors. The
information taken from the 1999 survey may be helpful in identifying marketing strategies.
It appears that the trend towards personal health and fitness that began in the 1980's is continuing
with an emphasis on faster paced aerobic exercises. This is evidenced by the 39% increase in the
number of people (50% of 1999 total) who indicated that they were using the trail, on that day, for
exercise. The corresponding decrease appears to have come from the "combination" category where
people may have been exercising but with a more recreational frame of mind. The observed activities
would seem consistent with this hypothesis as there was a 138% increase in the number of runners
observed, a 22% increase in the number of bikers and a 39% reduction in the number of observed
walkers. In line skating became a definable category in 1999 however, the specific composition of
the "other" category in the prior surveys is unknown.
The use of trails for transportation has remained consistent. However, it appeared going to work or
to shop via a trail was considerably higher at the survey points closest to a commercial district as
compared with the residential segments. This may be an indication that persons using the trails for
transportation purposes are not traveling great distances. The number of observed users was
considerably higher in the residential areas.
It was satisfying to see that many of the concerns identified in the earliest surveys have been
addressed or are in the planning/consideration process (Dodd and Cliff trails). The lack of awareness
pertaining to the winter plowing program is puzzling. It would seem to indicate that people are not
interested in winter trail use and therefore have not experienced them and/or more publicity is
needed.
Staff will have additional information at the Commission meeting.
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 6, 2000
SUBJECT: COMMISSION EVALUATION
As you will recall, Commission members were given the opportunity to respond to an Advisory
Commission Annual Self-Evaluation. Once all of the responses were received, they were compiled for
the City Council to review. A copy of that compilation is attached for your information as well.
While the attachment includes all of the City's Advisory Commissions and Task Forces, you may want
to note the feedback from the Advisory Parks Commission specifically.
Again, this compilation is for your information and no action is necessary.
RESULTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSION SELF-EVALUATION
Number of Responses:
Cable Commission - 4
Advisory Parks Commission - 6
Advisory Planning Commission - 5
Airport Relations Commission - 5
Economic Development Commission - 9
Solid Waste Abatement Commission - 5
Unidentified Forms - 1
AVERAGE SCORES
APrC APC ARC EDC SWAC TC OTHER
1. Meeting Arrangements
A. Meeting time is appropriate 4.50 4.60 4.60 4.44 4.40 4.50 5.00
B. Agendas are clear 4.66 4.60 4.40 4.11 4.00 4.50 4.00
C. Length of meetings is appropriate 3.83 4.60 4.40 4.33 4.00 4.00 4.00
D. Frequency of mtgs. is appropriate 4.66 4.60 4.20 4.33 4.40 4.50 5.00
E. Day of meeting is appropriate 4.66 4.60 4.40 4.44 4.60 4.50 5.00
2. General Operations
A. Commission role is clear 4.33 4.60 3.80 3.66 3.40 3.50 5.00
B. Role relating to public is clear 4.00 4.00 4.40 3.66 3.60 3.75 5.00
C. Adequate support data is provided 4.50 4.40 4.60 4.11 4.20 4.75 5.00
D. Chair's role is appropriate 4.66 4.60 4.40 4.00 4.40 4.50 5.00
E. Staffs role is appropriate 4.66 4.60 4.40 4.00 4.40 4.75 5.00
F. Members assume appropriate leadership 4.16 4.40 4.00 4.11 4.40 4.25 5.00
G. Members feel free to share ideas 4.33 4.60 4.20 4.44 4.60 4.75 5.00
H. Opinions heard before decisions are made 4.50 4.40 4.60 4.44 4.60 4.75 5.00
1. There are adequate means to reach
decisions 4.16 4.20 4.40 4.22 4.40 4.50 5.00
J. There are adequate means to resolve
conflict 4.16 4.40 4.20 4.00 4.40 4.50 5.00
K. Issues generally reach closure 4.33 4.60 4.20 3.62 4.20 4.50 4.00
3. Overall Assessment
A. Commission's effort benefits the
community 4.66 4.60 4.60 4.00 4.40 4.75 5.00
B. Commission deals with important issues 4.50 4.60 4.20 3.66 4.20 4.75 4.00
Members feel good about participating 4.60 4.40 4.40 4.00 4.20 4.75 5.00
There is communication with the public 3.66 4.40 4.40 4.00 3.40 4.50 5.00
E. There is communication with the Council 3.33 4.00 4.00 3.66 3.20 4.25 5.00
RESULTS OF TASK FORCE SELF-EVALUATION
Number of Responses:
Community Facilities Land Acquisition Task Force - 9
Cedar Avenue/TH 13 Task Force - 11
Unidentified Forms - 2
AVERAGE SCORES
LAND TH113 OTHER
1. Meeting Arrangements
A. Meeting time was appropriate 4.77 4.09 4.00
B. Agendas were clear 4.44 3.90 2.50
C. Length of meetings was appropriate 4.33 3.63 3.00
D. Frequency of mtgs. was appropriate 4.55 4.36 4.00
E. Day of meeting was appropriate 4.44 4.18 4.00
2. General Operations
A. Task Force's role was clear 4.55 3.27 3.00
B. Role relating to public was clear 4.50 3.27 3.50
C. Adequate support data was provided 4.22 3.81 4.50
D. Chair's role was appropriate 4.66 3.90 2.50
E. Staffs role was appropriate 4.55 4.36 4.00
F. Members assumed appropriate leadership 4.00 3.54 3.00
G. Members felt free to share ideas 4.77 4.27 4.00
H. Opinions were heard before decisions
were made 4.44 4.36 3.50
1. There were adequate means to reach
decisions 4.11 3.72 3.50
J. There were adequate means to resolve
conflict 4.37 3.45 3.50
K. Issues generally reached closure 4.33 3.72 3.00
3. Overall Assessment
A. Task Force's efforts benefited the
community 4.77 4.27 3.50
B. Task Force dealt with important issues 5.00 4.45 3.00
C. Members felt good about participating 4.77 3.90 3.50
D. There was communication with the
public 4.22 3.45 2.50
E. There was communication with the
Council 4.44 3.72 4.00
11,
COMMENTS
Advisory Planning Commission - (Adequate support data is provided) Very good staff reports. (Staff's role is
appropriate) Very good staff, very helpful staff. Compared to other years, discussion and issues can be sidetracked
by, or mired in personal agendas rather than focusing on appropriate code provisions or community issues.
Advisory Parks Commission - There is little or no communication between the City Council and the APrC. The
City Council lacks vision on how to continue development in Eagan. Developers are given too much freedom while
the natural resources and open spaces suffer. The City Council is paralyzed from taking action (making decisions) foi
fear of lawsuits, etc. The Mayor and/or certain City Council members have used their position to influence the work
of independent task forces. Citizens in the community have commented on what appears to be a voting block that has
developed on the Eagan City Council. Instead of 5 independent voices, it now appears that there are only 3; a voting
bloc of three members, and 2 individuals.
(The Commission deals with important issues) Would suggest an annual forum/workshop with the APC to discuss
common issues and concerns and to develop a sense of "shared" issues/concerns.
Airport Relations Commission - (Agendas were clear) credit goes to Jamie for keeping up on this. (Role relating to
the public was clear) Much improved in 1999. (Members assumed appropriate leadership) I would have liked to see
stronger feedback from other members. (The Commission's work benefited the community) I just wish the benefits
could be more visible. (There was communication with the Council) Would still like to increase frequency of
interaction.
As you know, I was not able to continue serving on the board due to a change in my resident status. While on the
Board, I had an enjoyable and enlightening experience. Thank you again for the opportunity to serve. (Peter Panos)
Economic Development Commission - (There is communication with the public) Cable - 5. Personal contact - 3.
New members seem to have little understanding of the role of this commission or issues relevant to economic
development. Increased role of Chamber/CVB at meetings has been beneficial. Personally, I believe there are too
many special interests represented on this commission - members also need to look at issues regarding what's good
for overall economic vitality in the community and less at what benefits their business. I think the commission has
not also tapped into Cal Clark's expertise. Please spend time at first organizational meeting providing a succinct
background on the EDC and previous issues addressed by the commission. In the next couple of years, all previous
connection with economic development goals/vision process will be lost with retiring members. New members are
good; however, in the past several years I see this group, except for a small (couple) members, returning to the once a
month - passive group of the 80's - 90's. Redevelopment will be a critical issue on the horizon, it will be so
important to have members who are committed to making strategic advisory recommendations to the Council with
thoughts to encourage and maintain our economic diversity and vitality while implementing standards.
The commission doesn't seem to have many significant issues to deal with at the present time, with the exception of
the Cedarvale project.
Solid Waste Abatement Commission - I'm pretty new and as I learn more I realize how well we do and how
valuable it is.
Telecommunications Commission - I feel our commission should meet with the City Council at least twice a year in
•orkshop sessions to discuss the commission's role, agenda, future challenges and just to become more comfortable
with the Council.
Unidentified - Jamie has been doing a fine job taking over for Jon. He had a hard act to follow.
COMMENTS
Community Facilities Land Acquisition Task Force - Fax was never acknowledged and it affected the festival site
for arts & crafts.
(Adequate support data was provided) Not available at the first meeting.
I attached the meetings from the beginning back in August as I have been so disappointed with the City and its part in
the Eagan July 4th celebration. This was my main agenda and was glad to hear from other concerned citizens with the
same ideas. There are many organizations and special interest that can benefit from a permanent central park used for
specific set events that won't overlap and cause more problems in the coming years. Also, since this land acquisition
will take time, I hope the Council and City staff will address the 2000 July 4' activities, place, etc. now.
v~'
December 16, 1999
CAPONI
LEARNING CENTER
Mr. Tom Hedges
City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Tom:
Enclosed find a copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by our Board of
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Directors on November 17, 1999. Please forward a copy to the Mayor and
members of the Council, the Parks and Recreation Commission and to
DAVID KENNEDY, Ken Vraa. I want to express my personal thanks to you and everyone at
PFWWW KRISTEN MCCARTHY, the City for your help and support.
Spry
UZZCRUZ MM RSEN, Our goal is to insure that the Park remains a natural and cultural resource
Trfts"
ANTHONYCAPONI for the City for generations to come. With the City's continuing support,
CIERYLCAPONI I'm confident that goal can be achieved.
IRENE DONALDSON
ROBERT GAVIN
FRANK MARTTEW ery truly urs,
CFERIE RIESENBERG
KEN VRAA
David nnedy
DJK:jes
Enclosure
cc: Cheryl Caponi (w/o enclosure)
1205 DIFFLEY
ROAD i}O
E A G A N MN ?/ti
55123 -
( 5 5 1 ) 4 5 4- 0 4 1 2
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
TO THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of Caponi Art Park as follows:
Section 1. Background: findings.
1.01 The staff of the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Eagan (Park &
Recreation) has worked cooperatively with the staff of Caponi Art Park (Park) to construct an
entrance gate and pathway (Entrance) to the Park connecting the parking area at the Lexington
Diffley Athletic Fields with the south portion of the Park and leading directly to the amphitheater
being constructed there.
1.02 The Entrance will greatly facilitate access to the Park and its activities and
enhance the opportunities for cooperative efforts by the City and the Park to provide high quality
recreational and cultural service to the residents of the City of Eagan and the surrounding
community.
1.03 The Board recognizes that the construction of the Entrance would not have been
possible without the assistance and support of the Parks and Recreation Department, the Park
and Recreation Commission and the City of Eagan.
1.04 The Board is committed to engaging in further cooperative efforts with the City to
ensure the development of the Park as a cultural and recreational resource of the City.
Section 2. Expression of Gratitude.
2.01 The Board expresses its profound gratitude to the Commission, the City Council
and the Parks and Recreation Department staff for their support and work on the Entrance.
2.02 The Executive Director is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution to the Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, .the Mayor and City
Council and the Director of Parks and Recreation.
David Kennedy
President
Attest: Cheryl Caponi
Executive Director
Adopted this 17'h day of November, 1999.
Members voting aye: Kennedy
C. Caponi
A. Capon
McCarthy
Petersen
Vraa
KE
3344
KE4OS-33
.Subject to approval
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16,1999
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on December 16,
1999 with the following Commission Members present: Joseph Bari, Terry Davis, N. Mark Filipi, Barbara Johnson,
Robert Kane, Jr., Bonnie Karson, George Kubik, Lee Markell and Daryle Petersen. Commission Members Kevin
Gutknecht and John Rudolph were not present. Staff present include Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation;
Jeff Asfahl, Superintendent of Recreation; Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent; Gregg Hove, Forestry Supervisor; CJ
Lilly, Parks Planner; Eric Macbeth, Water Resources Coordinator; Paula Nowariak, Recreation Supervisor and
Cherryl Mesko, Recording Secretary.
(APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Director Vraa added an award presentation after Approval of the November 15 Minutes and (2) Thomas
Lake CIP under Water Resources Update. George Kubik moved, Barbara Johnson seconded with all members
voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15,1999
George Kubik moved, N. Mark Filipi seconded with all members voting in favor to approve the minutes of
the November 15, 1999 meeting as presented.
AWARD PRESENTATION
Superintendent Olson presented Forestry Supervisor Hove with a Distinguished Service Award from the
Minnesota Society of Arboriculture. The award was for service to MSA and/or the field of arboriculture or urban
forestry and was specific to the creation of a music video for elementary school children that illustrates the
important relationship between trees and animals in the urban environment.
Supervisor Hove stated that it was a great honor to be recognized for doing a job you love to do.
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There was no one present who wished to address the Commission under this agenda item.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
Items highlighted by Director Vraa included the unseasonably warm weather delaying outdoor ice rinks,
staff has begun refurbishing the garage at the Art House, installation of the 2d phase playground for Red Pine
Elementary, manager's meetings for winter adults sports, the Majestic Oaks 2d Addition erosion problem, and the
aeration of 8 of Eagan's lakes this winter.
CONSENT AGENDA
Daryle Petersen moved, Barbara Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following
recommendations to the City Council regarding Oakwood Heights 3rd Addition:
1. This development shall be responsible for a water quality cash dedication in lieu of on-site
ponding.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 2
Barbara Johnson moved, George Kubik seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following
recommendations to the City Council regarding Hawthorne Suite Hotel:
1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication.
2. According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance, the required tree mitigation
calculates to the installation of twenty-one (21) category A trees, or forty-two (42) category B
trees, or eighty-fout (84) category C trees, or an equivalent combination of these trees as
mitigation for tree removal in excess of allowable limits. Mitigation shall be in addition to any
city required landscaping.
3. A revised tree mitigation plan shall be submitted before final plat approval that separates tree
mitigation trees from landscape required trees.
4. Tree Protective measures. (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root
Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
5. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection
at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the
approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
6. A water quality cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required.
DE V ELOP.MENT PROPOSALS
MURPHY FARM 3an ADDITION - RAY MILLER
Director Vraa provided the background of this proposal noting that the applicant is requesting preliminary
subdivision approval to allow the creation of a 25-lot single family residential subdivision north of Murphy Parkway
and east of Donegal Way, bordering Blackhawk Park. Vraa continued that this development previously fulfilled its
parkland dedication when the access to Blackhawk Park was negotiated. He did note that the developer would be
responsible for a trail from the entrance of Blackhawk Park to Donegal Way through a cash dedication.
Forestry Supervisor Hove reviewed the significant vegetation on the site. The tree inventory, which has
been modified by staff indicated there are 565 individual significant trees on site. The deciduous species include
red oak, bur oak, black cherry, birch, ash, aspen, and cottonwood, 6-40" in diameter. Some of the older oak trees are
estimated to be at least 150 years old. The conifer species include red pine, spruce and cedar, averaging about 40
feet in height.
Supervisor Hove shared an aerial photo of the site showing the existing woodlands. He also explained that
there was considerable grade change on the site, especially on the northeast side. The developer is proposing the
removal of 190 of the significant trees (34%) to allow preparation of the site at once. Since the allowable tree
removal is 40%, no tree mitigation will be required for this site, however, staff is recommending that individual lot
tree preservation plans be required for Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 7-16, 18, 21-24.
Member Davis asked if there will be individual lot tree removal given the developer wants to grade the
entire site at one time. Supervisor Hove suggested that that question would need to be answered by, the applicant.
Member Johnson questioned an area parallel to the Blackhawk Park entrance road that appeared to be a
large area marked for tree removal. Supervisor Hove explained that the area was the entrance to Lot 18, which, as
proposed, would result in significant vegetative removal adjacent to the Blackhawk Park entrance road.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 3
Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth explained that he has been working with homeowners to the east of
the Blackhawk Park entrance road who wanted to work on expanding the capacity of the sediment pond behind their
lots. Macbeth continued that 60% of the runoff from this development can be used to expand the sediment pond and
the 40% remaining would leave the site without any further treatment. He expressed concern that additional silt
fence would need to be installed to prevent erosion on Lot 21. Member Markell asked if there were erosion
concerns for other lots. Macbeth responded that there are some concerns on all lots.
Member Johnson asked if there would be ponding on Lot 18. Coordinator Macbeth said there should not
be ponding on that lot; it should run to the east and under the road to the pond.
Member Kubik pointed out a hydrant location near the trail adjacent to the park entrance and expressed
concern that the vegetation that had been planted in that area will have to be removed. Director Vraa responded by
pointing out the area Member Kubik had referenced and stated that staff has asked if this hydrant could be moved to
another location. If the hydrant stayed in this location, Vraa added, a 16' wide area would be needed, resulting in
the removal of significant vegetation currently in place.
Another concern expressed by Director Vraa was the steep grade of the driveway for Lot 18. Because it is
a north facing driveway, it may pose some difficulty in the winter as it enters onto Murphy Parkway.
Ray Miller addressed the Commission stating that he is an Eagan homeowner living in the area and will
move into this development when it's completed. He added that Paul Danielson from BRW, the consulting engineer
for this project, was present to answer any questions the Commission may have.
Member Petersen asked why the fire hydrant was placed where it was and wondered if it was to service Lot
18. Mr. Danielson responded that the hydrant was required by the Fire Department. They originally placed the
hydrant closer to the location of the home on Lot 18 but there were some concerns raised by staff about that
location. Mr. Danielson stated they would work with staff and look at other location options so as not to disturb the
vegetation.
Member Petersen asked if the Fire Department had concerns about getting fire trucks up the driveway. Mr.
Danielson responded that they have included a flat area near Murphy Parkway and near the home to meet those
concerns.
Member Markell expressed concern for the safety and impervious surface of the 320' driveway for Lot 18,
the serious visual impact that this particular lot will have on the entrance to Blackhawk Park and opined that this lot
is a real stretch for this development. Member Davis added that if Lot 18 didn't exist there would not be a need for
a fire hydrant.
Member Johnson asked if Lot 18 was planned first with the balance of the lots designed around it or vice
versa. Mr. Miller responded that they were careful in their planning to preserve the look and integrity of the site and
this is just how the lots could be laid out while maintaining the 25 lots they needed for the site.
Member Markell reiterated that the entrance to Blackhawk Park will be significantly altered with this flag
lot. Member Petersen opined that Lot 18 was out of character with the other parts of this development. He .
suggested combining Lots 12 and 18 rather than separating them. He added that he was opposed to flag lots and that
it doesn't fit with this development.
Mr. Miller responded that 25 lots are required for this development to occur. During the planning process
they have gone from 26 to 25 lots and pointed out the difficulty of the site because of the significant grade changes.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 4
Member Markell asked the applicant if he could say that the visual and aesthetic value of Blackhawk Park
won't be impacted by this development. Mr. Miller responded that he would work to minimize the number of trees
removed on the site by removing only those trees necessary to develop the land, i.e. roads and utilities.
Director Vraa and Parks Planner CJ Lilly shared cross sections and photos of the area adjacent to the
Blackhawk Park entrance road that will be impacted by the installation of a driveway to Lot 18.
Member Markell asked Mr. Miller what options he had looked at for this development. Mr. Miller stated
that several options had been considered including the possibility of creating a flag lot behind Lot 21, however the
slopes created some significant issues. Mr. Miller reiterated that they had looked at multiple scenarios in trying to
find the balance of maintaining 25 lots on the site to make the development viable.
N. Mark Filipi noted that there has been significant discussion about Lot 18 that borders Blackhawk Park.
Member Filipi moved, and Member Davis seconded, with all members voting in favor to defer this item to the
Natural Resources/Land Acquisition sub-committee for further review.
Member Markell suggested an option that could be considered would be the City's acquisition of Lot 18 or
discuss what options can be considered for re-design. Member Kubik suggested that the applicant be included in the
subcommittee meeting.
Mr. Miller commented that there was some urgency with this project since it was to appear before the City
Council on January 4, 2000. He added that the property owners had been assured that this would be handled by the
City in a timely fashion and they are expecting that this process will not be delayed. He then asked how soon the
sub-committee would meet and if it could be before the Advisory Planning Commission meeting on December 21.
Member Davis responded that the Commission is bending over backwards to make this work but if the applicant is
forcing a decision immediately, the consensus of the Commission appears to be to deny the development because of
the impact to Blackhawk Park specifically by Lot 18. Mr. Miller reiterated the property owners want to see a
decision made soon and do not want the process delayed. Member Davis stated that a sub-committee meeting will
not occur before December 21 and asked if the City Council required a recommendation from the APrC to proceed.
Director Vraa explained that this would not slow down the process for the applicant. They can continue through the
process and meet with the Advisory Planning Commission without a recommendation from the Advisory Parks
Commission. They also have the option to go directly to the City Council from that point if they so choose.
Mr. Miller asked if they could meet with the sub-committee and then get back to the whole Commission
prior to the City Council meeting. It was noted that the next Commission meeting would be after the January 4 City
Council meeting. Mr. Danielson stated that the rezoning needs to occur at the January 4 City Council meeting and
Mr. Miller again reiterated that they had been assured that this would be done by January 4.
Member Davis pointed out that even if the APrC made a recommendation to acquire Lot 18, City Council
approval would be necessary before this could occur. Member Petersen asked if the sub-committee would be able to
meet before the next Commission meeting. Director Vraa interjected that they would need to meet sooner if this
item is, in fact, going to the Council on January 4.
Following further discussion, a sub-committee meeting was set for December 28 at 5:00 p.m.
Member Kubik asked if this was a workable time frame. Director Vraa stated that it would be very tight
but would provide an opportunity to discuss what options are possible. Member Kubik stated that a very good
information bank would be necessary for this to be a successful meeting, therefore, everyone attending would need
to be prepared to assess all options presented.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 5
Following further discussion, Daryle Petersen moved, Terry Davis seconded with all members voting in
favor to make the following recommendations regarding Murphy Farm 3'd Addition:
1. This proposal shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication for a trail to be constructed along
Murphy Parkway from the entrance to Blackhawk Park to Donegal Way.
2. According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance there is no tree mitigation applied to
this application, however, individual lot tree preservation plans will be required for lots 1, 2, 3, 5,
7-16,18,21-24.
3. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root
Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
4. The applicant shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction
site inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance
with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
5. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding should be required for 40 percent of the area (5.1
acres) of this development.
6. This development shall be referred to a December 28, 1999 Land Acquisition sub-committee
meeting to discuss the potential options of Lot 18.
OLD BUSINESS
There were no items under Old Business for the Commission to review.
NEW BUSINESS
BASKETBALL PROPOSAL
Chris Moarn, a local developer, addressed the Commission requesting consideration for a public-private
initiative to develop a basketball/volleyball facility. The City Council had asked the Commission to review the
request and report its findings and recommendations.
Mr. Moarn presented a video of the type of facility he would propose in Eagan and shared some of
elements that a Hoops facility could offer residents of Eagan and the surrounding area. Because of the tremendous
growth of youth basketball in the community, Mr. Moarn thought that this would be an ideal location for a facility of
this type. The City is being asked to consider this type of facility on the Central Park property the City is trying to
acquire.
Mr. Moam commented that although he does not have all the answers, he would like to see what kind of
facility can work in Eagan. He suggested consideration of a center court design that can provide seating for up to
900 but allows flexibility for dances, proms, and other special events. The multiple courts surrounding the center
would continue to be used for ongoing court activities. He opined that this would be a great opportunity to provide
an interesting element to the site in a private/public partnership.
Member Bari asked how many facilities there are in the country now. Mr. Moarn responded there were 4
privately owned and 2 private/public facilities. Member Petersen asked if this was the only property they have
looked at for the facility. Mr. Moarn responded that the center court scenario would work well at this site.
Member Davis asked how the review of this proposal could integrate into the Community Center Task
Force rather than just a small group from the Advisory Parks Commission. Director Vraa commented that the Task
Force is more global in scope and a smaller group may be able to look at this issue in more detail.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 6
Mr. Moarn was thanked for his presentation and no further direction was given by the Commission.
TEEN ISSUE
Director Vraa introduced this item stating that the report is intended to provide background information on
youth and teens and identify possible responses the community might undertake to meet the needs of Eagan Teens.
This issue is becoming more and more important in communities and the Commission may want to start to figure
out where Parks and Recreation fits into the overall picture.
Recreation Supervisor Paula Nowariak presented some of the highlights of the report citing many facts and
statistics from the Search Institute, which has studied youth development for more than 10 years. She reviewed the
external and internal assets and pointed out 60 ideas for building assets.
Member Markell asked how the City can partner with some of the existing church youth programs and
asked what other cities have top-notch programs. Supervisor Nowariak commented that Burnsville has a teen
facility that took 5 years of planning before it opened. A Weed and Seed Grant was the beginning for their planned
facility and services but took a great deal of work by the community to accomplish. This type of progamming
entails significant commitment from the Commission, City Council and community to be successful.
Member Kubik recalled trying to get youth to participate on the Recreation sub-committee. He noted that
this required extensive staff support to accomplish.
Member Bari suggested that this report should be a part of the consideration in looking at a potential
community center. He also suggested that the report be used as a guide to help the City in making decisions
regarding the needs of teens.
Member Petersen asked if the meetings between teens and adults, which had been held in the past several
years, were still on-going. Director Vraa responded that the focus of those meetings was for a youth facility but the
City Council chose to put dollars toward a teen facility at the YMCA. Member Petersen recalled that the group had
verbalized some of their concerns at that time. Member Johnson suggested following up with the YMCA to see
what has been accomplished with teens at their facility. If it has not been successful, there is a need to see what else
can be done.
Member Davis noted that there are no'teen members on the Community Center Task Force and asked if we
could encourage them to attend since they have a vested interest. Member Johnson also noted that a Teen Center
was discussed at Cedarvale. She suggested that this issue needs to be more focused rather than scattering in lots of
directions.
Member Markell asked what other cities with similar demographics have done. Member Petersen
reiterated Member Bari's comment about using the report to help identify issues and how they can be resolved.
They thanked Supervisor Nowariak for an excellent report.
Supervisor Nowariak concluded by stating that the City as a whole needs to determine the direction they
are going with addressing teen issues in the community and need to work collectively to try to reach those goals.
SET JANUARY MEETING DATE
The January Commission meeting was set for January 10, 2000 with January 19 as the back-up date if the
Council chambers are not available on the 100'.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 7
PARKS AND RECREATION UPDATE
Superintendent Olson stated that staff is planning to begin the flooding of rinks on December 19 with the
earliest opening scheduled for the week of December 27. It is anticipated that the Goat Hill Park rink with the
bituminous surface will be open by Christmas. Olson added that the City has hired approximately 30+ rink
attendants to date.
Superintendent Asfahl noted that the women's chorus has started off very well and the interest continues to
grow. There were 65 applicants for the Special Events Supervisor position with 6 candidates reaching the final
interview phase. Asfahl added that the Friends of the Farm programming committee met and that Recreation
Supervisors Nowariak, Rippe and Rivamonte are aggressively working on new programming opportunities.
WATER RESOURCES UPDATE
FISH LAKE CIP
Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth noted that Fish Lake is the City's highest priority water body and
has been inhabited by curlyleaf pondweed since approximately 1988. The Diagnostic/Feasibility Study and
Implementation Plan (Plan) for Fish Lake recommends decreasing the abundance of curlyleaf pondweed in the lake
to improve both its water quality and recreational suitability.
The Plan for Fish Lake identifies control of curlyleaf ponweed as a management priority. Control
strategies recommended included both winter water-level downdraw to freeze in-shore lake sediments and
cutting/harvesting of the macrophyte in intermediate depths of the lake, prior to winter bud release in late spring or
early summer. Staff believes that a minimal drawdown capability of 4-6 feet is necessary to provide an acceptable
level of control for curlyleaf pondweed, however the lake has a maximum gravity drawdown of only about 2 feet.
In 1997 the Natural Resources Subcommittee met with Rich Brasch and recommended that consideration
be given only to two options to drawdown the lake; 1) construction of a new gravity outlet and 2) permanent
installation of a submersible pump (lift station). Since that meeting, research by engineering consultants point to the
construction of a lift station as the most effective way of lowering Fish Lake 4-6 feet. The improvement will be paid
for with a 0% interest loan that has been extended according to Macbeth.
Member Bari asked how long this will last and expressed concern for fish kill. Coordinator Macbeth
responded that they don't expect much fish kill. Member Kubik expressed interest in getting feedback on the results
of this project.
Following further brief discussion, Terry Davis moved, George Kubik seconded with all members voting in
favor to submit a request to the City Council to direct the preparation by engineering consultants of necessary plans,
specifications, and bid documents for this project and to authorize the advertisement of Requests for Proposals to
construct the project.
THOMAS LAKE CIP
Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth explained that BP- 12 is a sediment basin located south of Thomas
Lake and just north of Well Station #13 along Cliff Road. According to the City's Stormwater Management Plan,
BP-12 is designed to have a normal water level of 908.0 and a high water level of 914.0. Ideally, runoff that enters
BP-12 needs to stay as long as possible for sediment in it to settle out to reduce phosphorus loading to Thomas Lake.
Macbeth continued that evidence over the past several years suggests that stormwater entering Thomas Lake near
BP- 12 is not being adequately treated by BP- 12.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 8
Coordinator Macbeth explained that the project entails the excavation of BP-12 to create as much treatment
capacity as possible for water quality purposes. The project is expected to be carried out in Winter 2000 by the
Engineering Department.
Following further brief discussion, George Kubik moved, Daryle Petersen seconded with all members
voting in favor to request the City Council to proceed with this project by directing the preparation of necessary
plans and specification.
3TRER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
HOLZ FARM ANNUAL REPORT
Chair Markell reviewed the Holz Farm Annual report noting that the Friends of the Farm had a very
successful year culminating with an extremely well attended Lone Oak Days. The programming sub-committee has
begun brainstorming for 2000 and would welcome input from Commission Members.
SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATES
There were no subcommittee updates.
PARKING/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TASK FORCE UPDATE
Member Davis stated that he and Member Markell approached the City Council to form a joint task force
consisting of members from the Advisory Planning Commission and the Advisory Parks Commission to review
parking and impervious surface issues that relate to development. It was noted that the Advisory Planning
Commission was eager to participate and appointed Carla Heyl and Meg Tilley to represent their group. Members
Davis and Petersen were appointed to represent the APrC. Lee Markell and Larry Frank will participate as residents
since neither will be serving as a Commission Member.
SET MEETING - TREE MITIGATION FUND TASK FORCE
The Tree Mitigation Fund Task Force set their meeting for December 28, 1999 following review of the
Murphy Farm 3`l Addition. The Land Acquisition/Natural Resources sub-committees will participate in this
meeting.
SET JANUARY MEETING - MOONSHINE PARK PLANNING
The Moonshine Park Planning meeting was set for 6:00 p.m., preceding the January Commission meeting.
Members Johnson and Filipe volunteered to participate in the meeting. Bonnie Karson volunteered to serve a
resident representative since she will not be serving as a Commission Member following the January meeting.
COMUNICATIONS
Director Vraa brought the Commission's attention to a petition signed by 112 senior residents of Eagan
requesting that the City establish a senior citizen's center similar to those of other communities. The petition was
sent to the City Administrator for Council direction. There was no action required by the Commission
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of December 16, 1999 meeting
Page 9
POUND TABLE
There were no Round Table items discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to conduct George Kubik moved, Daryle Petersen seconded with all members
voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Secretary Date