Loading...
2875 Lexington Ave - Noncompliant Septic Inspection 2024-03-19 �� MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance inspection report form CONTROL AGENCY 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement Instructions:Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit(LGU)and system owner within 15 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Instructions for filling out this form are located on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)website at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/defaultifiles/wq-wwists4-31 a.pdf. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID#or Sec/Twp/Range: (� -�(O ln-C Reason for Inspection P(E-6 `TR1�NS�ER. Local regulatory authority info: � 1�x�r(�-�r' h-)wpuC �-�N E/k(oKo-' S'Ch(.-�.�( lC,k. NAt,��L Property address: _ 1\y\-. Owner/representative: C,l}P\-r/�� P1}2Tou•�2� '��rL Owners phone: l0\Z'2 Brief system description: n � /C f-5$('60t- - /� IRM—P" l 0o t system status System status on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 3' ❑Compliant-Certificate of compliance* XNoncompliant-Notice of noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded,replaced,or imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. abatement under section 145A.04,subdivision 8 is discovered or An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt *Note:Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or R.7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. guarantee future performance. Reason(s)for noncompliance(check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health(Compliance component#1)-Imminent threat to public health and safety Tank integrity(Compliance component#2)-Failing to protect groundwater DRQ(w C%-Ll / G£5s960 t-- ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance component#3)-Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance component#3)-Failing to protect groundwater ❑System not abandoned according to Minn. R.7080.2500(Compliance component#3)-Failing to protect groundwater Soil separation(Compliance component#5)-Failing to protect groundwater ❑Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance component#4)-Noncompliant-local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations CA -> Nom 3� "^PPc Dv� 'Cb Vo'F CAd�r� a 1C --t-� A- 60 TT ovn Dvf— - Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system.No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction,possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance,or future water usage. By typing my name below,1 certify the above statements to be true and correct,to the best of my knowledge,and that this information can be used for the purpose of processing this form. Business name: l/S Certification number: Inspector signature: License number: ' L\•z-to� (Thi t n electronically signed) Phone: Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) Soil observation logs X System/As-Built ,Locally required forms ❑Tank Integrity Assessment ❑Operating Permit ❑Other information(list): PO-T V-'Op f-, D"f. ~Td C>ee-rA 'V-i> Pe,C5WC-C 6C- https://www.pca.state.mn.us https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 4/28/2021 Page 1 of 4 Property Address: Date: Business Name: ,AQ (, V 1. Impact on public health—Compliance component#1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System discharges sewage to the ❑Yes" CS�No ❑Other: ground surface ❑ Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain ❑Yes` No the or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into ❑Yes* ❑No dwelling or establishment. Any"yes"answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: 2. Tank integrity—Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System consists of a seepage pit, Yes" ❑No ❑Empty tank(s)viewed by inspector cesspool,drywell,leaching pit, or other it? Name of maintenance business: Sewage tank(s)leak below their ❑Yes* []No License number of maintenance business: designed operating depth? k)PV- ,L�W >V Date of maintenance: ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment(Attach) Date of maintenance If yes,which sewage tanks leaks: (mm/dd/yyyy): (must be within three years) Any"yes"answer above indicates the system (See foram instructions to ensue:assessment complies with is failing to protect groundwater. Minn.R. 7082.0700 subp.4 B(1)) ❑Tank is Noncompliant(pumping not necessary—explain below) ❑Other: Describe verification methods and results: 6 F C�l1J ��T� Dia CSS https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 4/28/2021 Page 2 of 4 Property Address: 2.�S l�j`�NC� GA(I Business Name: L -) Date: 3. Other compliance conditions—Compliance component#3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound(damaged,cracked,etc.),or unsecured? El Yes* [I No Unknown 3b. Other issues(electrical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety?❑Yes* ❑Noxunknown *Yes to 3a or 3b-System is an imminent threat to public health and safety, l 3c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? .Yes* ❑No 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn.R.7080.2500? ❑Yesj._R No CC%eoC) *Yes to 3c or 3d-System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation:❑Not applicable ❑ 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP*—Compliance component#4 of 5 4Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑Yes ❑No Any "no"answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑Operating permit(Attach) ❑ https://www.pca.state.mn.us + 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 4/28/2021 Page 3 of Property Address: 2�S'i� �'� t N G- G N A-Jtt--''f- Sbv "t w Business Name: LA G � Date: �q. S. Soil separation—Compliance component#5 of 5 Date of installation Unknown ltt�fi L4-S:T U P-01 k-Tr,, (mrn1dd(yyyy) STAT l u N 7b -rKtf_PG%A-£"> Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food ❑Yes ❑ No Attached supporting documentation: beverage lodging? Soil observation logs completed for the report Compliance criteria select one): ❑Two previous verifications of required vertical separation 5a.For systems built prior to April 1, 1996,and ❑Yes ANo* ❑Not applicable(No soil treatment area) not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical �'��L��ESS PUO L t`�` separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. --� NG c� e'?A- 5b.Non-performance systems built ❑Yes [:]No* Indicate depths or elevations April 1, 1996,or later or for non- A.Bottom of distribution media Z-ly performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a B.Periodically saturated soiI46dro4 food,beverage,or lodging establishment: C.System separation '— Drainfield has a three-foot vertical ° separation distance from periodically D.Required compliance separation* saturated soil or bedrock.* *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. 5c."Experimental", "Other;or"Performance" ❑Yes ❑No* systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080.2350 or 7080.2400 (intermediate Inspector License required s 2,500 gallons per day,Advanced Inspector License required>2,500 gallons per day) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated'soil or bedrock. *Any"no"answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Upgrade requirements:(Minn. Stat.§115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(1TPHS)must be upgraded,replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorterperiod drequired by local ordinance./f the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.If an existing system is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food, beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law. https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 4/28/2021 Page 4 of 4 r ®a G rh Ac 1- 1 m � . V' a QQ as fit oev alIlkJ ELM p " fill r-E, �' Ip Ag or _ L 4 SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEM SITE PLAN.&DRA)RNG desipp2sitepi 2006 RE M VIM VVPORMA 77ON 4 1eMC3v%tf%C,'Y%< Mwk-;N ivsv Parrow IV Lakes streams,wetlands Road righ"pway(s) aced soil treatment area FJAb OHWT of public waters 'J0J t Unex,dimensions&easements MkO soil treatment area A 0 Floodplain&Flooding potential area: -- cem route for tank nudumnee ASo boring locations A 0 Direction of slope 3Z Elmdon of bottom of soil treatment area tjA 0 Wi lls within 100 feet Ott 0 Loudon of disturbed or compacted areas XSetbacks from buildings NA I Se ver lines within 50 feet of wells HbO Location of run-on potential areas PTroposed&existing buildings SCALE: JJn! _ZOO_ . . . ........ ...... ...... —------ L ........_­...;........ .... ............ .0 ----- k" ----- st C_ kt r -4 -_«G.,..._•4_--j_ • "4 .. C'G. r _T-.. I I I I ......77 lilt t k TA-L NU .......... . A P . ...... .............. oul-u6 -1 _4_ ------ ............... . ...... ....... 4- .... ........... —4- ............ D tJq2kil" 'i LA-Z License Number Date 3 Soil Map—Dakota County,Minnesota 3 t to m 488240 488270 488900 488330 488960 488390 486420 44°51'11"N 44°51'11"N i I � s I r 4 bS 1 1 7 o � e � � � a 1. 44°51'2"N 44°51'2"N 488240 488270 488300 488330 488360 488390 488420 3 3 Co Map Sole:1:1,370 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet mMeters ° N 0 20 40 80 120 Q Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 15N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 N � N 0 N _ a) co Q a) CD W o 7 o -o w = _ m N C ° �° m o E m w a m ° c E ° o V) — r = z m U m co O c ^ � U O N O m E O E ai 'am ° n wm ° wo cn E c -0m N Q-O m m O m M Q v) W. N U ,m.. p 7 E m w E m 3 (n aa) C7 ° w Z y N n L Y w °o Q 3 �' o o Q m o o mgm a) o 3 ° EE > 0 0- Q m mnQ3c E U W mm o p cC s 3 mm co U) -0 -� rp m'w N U N O N 0' Q m C a) cLQO O O O Ew m E m m' -r c ° m wU) co 0) Q m M m ro o r o 0 � N LL m a) °_ °c > c ow a) m c'� ° oS °n o E�m N z �' a c m O r ° a)) -° °� m o -0 U a m E m >,-°a u ° m aNi aoi ° o o E m m `m E c m n� U mai 0-o -ao o a ° � � Q U N u j O a) L.2 O N N @ O a) � N a O (0 m E n 0 @ m Q o m n p N t ami c °n ms () ZpE mfl m ° aci is m O "'ac > c ~ wa) a0 °)m io0 ma`) E `oo)o � a) — O C C O C .N. 0• i> >, a) L m co 7 v) - N p .) d7 (p Q Z 0 c m m w o c m cp -r- ° c Q o o o Q m U) a) 0 E cm >,a) cn a) E 3 m m v 'y o m n m w E ao m �� @'N 0.0 o o m ami a) o `m ZQ Qo mr) t ° °0 � aO E °)c nm ai y 'n (D U) a N0 w m a � E � np o.� (1) L C m 7 0 .Q N U N � _ = 0 N O E c°o' w E. LP c $ u°, a E <n� C) 2 E, m H o US U') in 0� F °E n m 0 aa)) C T C_ N i' V) a) 0 O 7 > m — m 0 Y Q m w O a)m w n a) m U z m Z> U) () -O y y o cn a U) m E ° o ° m o m N ° a a) Z CL O N d t n N C 'cp U) 'm U U) U) > O U) 3 U) O d' C O J Q 0 R C LLQc d N ,^ C V � H � m w J a _ C cQ O o) N w G a) d J d y a) a) _ a a 3 @ o ° o O d o 0 Co 3 `� ' d o o w .o- o n n a O a7 N /a n U d — O O c fn c� N T d Q ca )i ° o > > v LL m ° a c ° ° In N 0 .0 '0 '0 C O f6 O a) 2 C > C_ fU/) U C C > Y -gyp '0 Q U) co U) '0 m m U U C:) (7 J J 2 Z> 2 d K U) U) co c) (n U) d a ° C U 0 en RI N Cl) Q N 30 C N O Q) w m O N c m O Z U I t.' Soil Map—Dakota County,Minnesota Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 39132 Wadena loam,2 to 6 percent 0.9 8.6% slopes,eroded 411A Waukegan silt loam,0 to 1 5.6 55.6% percent slopes 889B Wadena-Hawick complex,2 to 1.7 17.5% 6 percent slopes 1816 Kennebec variant silt loam 1.8 18.3% Totals for Area of Interest 10.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/19/2024 i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3