Eagan Gardens - 2010-10-29 Non-structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report re Permit EA096047Non - Structural Steel Special
Inspection Final Report
Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair
4110 Rahn Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Prepared for
Restoration Technologies, Inc.
Project BL -10 -09010
October 29, 2010
Braun Intertec Corporation
RECElvE
NOV 012010
irt AU 11
1NTERTEC
October 29, 2010
Mr. Scott Schreifels
Restoration Technologies, Inc.
8201 Central Avenue N, Suite B
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
Re: Non- Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal
Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair
4110 Rahn Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Schreifels:
Please find attached to this procedural report the Non - Structural Steel Special Inspection Final
Report for the above referenced project in Eagan, Minnesota. Also included are the Special
Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records.
Special Inspection and Testing Procedures
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Project BL -10 -09010
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special
inspectors in general accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17 of the International Building
Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and /or the project plans and specifications.
The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the
project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to
determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't
have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge,
or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this.
As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to
summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the
contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing
correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted.
Plans and Specifications
Project plans and specifications titled Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair prepared by
Collaborative Design Group dated August 13, 2010 were provided to us and available at the site for
our reference during inspections.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Restoration Technologies, Inc.
Project BL -10 -09010
October 29, 2010
Page 2
Summary of Special Inspections and Material Observations and Tests
Masonry Construction Observations
Prior to conducting the observations, the special inspector reviewed the construction documents
and any associated approved submittals. As construction began, the proportions of the site
prepared mortar, construction of mortar joints and the location of reinforcement and connectors
was observed for compliance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.
The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in
addition to the type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry
to structural members, frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the
specified size, grade and type of reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in
compliance with the guidelines of the IBC.
Prior to grouting, the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors,
proportions of site - prepared grout and construction of mortar joints were observed.
Concrete Masonry Grout Testing
The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C1019: Standard Test Method
for Sampling and Testing Grout. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to
our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the
grout prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became
available.
General
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised
under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same
locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project.
After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require
additional information, please feel free to contact Brad McCarter (952- 995 -2268) at your
convenience.
Respectfully Submitted,
oannrrso
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPOR J�dN ° dri je .�
s .0 i
rad
Staff
Matthew P. Ruble, PE
Principal Engineer
Non- StructSpeclnspFinalRpt
0,
' �'� ' ' 4
, o• s LICENSED S"3
9 PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEEr • "
cCarter, PEI • g
y e 48478 "Zr.::"
h �'R�`
Attachment:
Non - Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report
Cc: Craig Milkert, Collaborative Design Group
Building Inspector, City of Eagan
Restoration Technologies, Inc.
Project BL -10 -09010
October 29, 2010
Page 3
BRAUN
INTERTEC
AWN
INTER <TEC
Non - Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 2
City of: EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: October 29, 2010
Project: Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair
4110 Rahn Road
Braun Intertec Project: BL -10 -09010
Braun Intertec Corporation
1 1001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Attention: Mr. Scott Schreifels
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of
services, the required special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items:
Structural Masonry Construction
The required structural masonry observations and testing detailed in the attached Special Inspection
Daily Reports have been completed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans
and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. The installation was found acceptable
following the required connections or review by the project structural engineer. Following the required
corrections, the structural masonry construction was found acceptable.
There are no outstanding or unresolved structural masonry- related issues.
Based upon the inspections performed, the testing completed and the attached Special Inspection Daily
Reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was
performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable
workmanship provisions of the International Building Code.
Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
unde.r.h- e laws of the State of Minnesota.
Bradle 1. Carter, PE
Staff ngine r
MN L' a Number: 48478
October 29, 2010
Attachments:
Non - Structural Steel Special Inspection Daily Reports
Masonry Test Report
BRAUN
• - - -„ Providing engineering and environmental salt tt44 nc i f57
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Report No.:
Project Name: Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair Project No.: BL10 -9010
Project Address: Eagan, MN
Client:
Weather:
Cloudy
Type of Inspection:
❑ Continuous
® Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
® Masonry ® Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations
❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing
❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils
❑ Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below)
No
Description and location of work completed:
- Observed the placement of rebar and grout for 2 openings in the masonry wall in the SW corner of the ramp. The existing
masonry wall was not grouted. Notified the SER and the SER said the contractor could just grout and place the rebar in the first 8"
of the existing block. The reinforcement appeared to be placed in general accordance with what the SER specified.
List tests performed:
Report Emailed to:
City of Eagan
Loosbrock, Tom
Special Inspection Daily Report
Client Project No.:
Date: September 25, 2010
Temperature: 60 ° F
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
• Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor:
Yes ❑ No ❑
❑ No El
No El
I.D. No.: 1136593 -84
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above.
Page 1 of 1
•Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Project Manager:
2
Description and location of work completed:
List tests performed:
Signed:
• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Print Full Name:
City of FAc
Date of This Report:
MJ2AEiit S PANG pAr+P I24ttZ Project No.:
440 2At4d 1elf.
geSizahnon( TEC1440. 41E-c r.'NC. Client Project No.:
g, cerfErn9 Temp/Weather:
_- Type -of- Inspection . -- _--- Inspection-Coverage ___
❑ Continuous
'eriodic
offi■Masonry
❑ Welding & Bolting
❑ Piles & Piers
❑ Rebar Placement
❑ Concrete Placement
❑ Tendon Placement
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans?
❑ Foundations
❑ Fireproofing
❑ Soils
Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑
❑ Special Cases
P 6/) o8 ssuAR/4 6 s of Geou r 4o 66244( Pr
Date:
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
I.D. No.:
Special Inspection Daily Report
&to - ag O to
No Cg.
No
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provision of the current IBC, except as noted above.
White copy to Braun lntertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative.
Ca„ ioy 70 4S°
Page 1 of
SIDRPT Rev 10/09
• Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Masonry Test Report
Client: Scott Schreifels
Restoration Technologies, Inc.
8201 Central Avenue NE, Suite B
Spring Lake Park, MN, 55432
Project: BL -10 -09010
Eagan Gardens Parking Ramp Repair
4110 Rahn Road
Eagan, MN, 55122
PM: Brad McCarter, bmccarter @Braunlntertec.com
Form No: 18958.V1.00, Report No: CU:W10- 002515 -M1 (c) 2000 -2009 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Minneapolis Laboratory
Braun Intertec Corporation
Phone: 952- 995 -2000
Wayne Golembeck
Concrete Laboratory Supervisor
Date of Issue: 10/27/2010
Sample ID:
Supplier
Date Cast:
Mix Design:
Masonry Units:
No. Used:
Max. Curing Temperature ( °F):
Sample Location:
W10-002515-M1
Quickcrete
9/28/2010
Set No.:
Plant.
Date Received:
Received Age:
Slump (in.):
Grout Temperature ( °F):
Min. Curing Temperature ( °F):
Repair Lower Level Park Ramp Walls- Corefill Floor to Bottom of Bond Beam
M -1
On -Site
9/29/2010
1
8.00
Specimen ID Date Tested
Age (Days) Avg. Width (in) Avg. Length (in) Avg. Height (in) Ultimate Load (Ibf) Compressive
Strength (psi)
28 149 3.48 6.16 81600 6740
28 3.63 3.60 6.21 86200 6610
28 3.55 3.50 6.15 87170 7020
M -1 \1
M -1\2
................
M -1\3
10/26/2010
10/26/2010
.. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .
10/26/2010
I Avg. Compressive Strength (psi): 6790 Specified Strength (psi): 3000 at 28 Days
51
Sampled at project
The average 28 day tests meets or exceeds the specified strength.
Page 1 of 1
Techn'cal (2)
1)escription(3)
Type of
Inspector (4)
Specific Repott
Fr uuency(S)
Assigned
Firm (6)
_ Section
Atticic
- att44k
. O t c.
—
NIAoSont (
.if's ENT'
°b l G
Project Name
I ocntion
(
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
O Special Structura Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule
(��a Pt No
Permit No
Y.k lyq 14
Ant /174r
►`��.IC.t.� ' �RAaeF
Note: Thls schedule Anil he filled out and included inn Speci Str•nctural 'testi and inspectlon t'rogram.
(If not Otherwise specified, assumed ptogtam will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & 'testing " as contained in the State
Building Code and as modified by the state adopted IBC.)
*A cotnplete specification -ready ptograin can he downloaded directly by visiting CASt'1MN at www cecnr org#
Permit No to be provided by the Building Official
Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the ptomain
Use descriptions pet I13C Chapter 17, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code
Special Inspector - technical (SIT); Special Inspector Structotal(S1S)
Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc
Nan Finn contracted to perform set vices
ACKN()WI EDGE MENtS
(Each appropriate representative shall sign below)
Finre1 .f(,r•f' L`tr z• t(_rt
Piiur _T�ioT�.n� Tf'ca% -.
► itni:
Fit nt't.t.A.Slll{ 5 1oc.._(�'1f4tt
1'11111 'Fe AA& N i7 / �
t•irnt; j33 it 4 1.4 , ;r i3.) r? - t Czne t .
Firm: ,t7 14)( _ '1 1 /AP.-
nested by engineertatchttect of tccord or building official, the i tran)e:; of all prospective special inspectors
a? I the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment
legend: SFR -8 Structural P.ngincet of Itecotd
SI -S ^ Special inspector - Sttuctntui
Accepted tin the Building Depattmwnt fly
tit -T' - Spcciat Inspector - 1 !mica( fA esting Agency
- Fabricator
!Tate
f1CSD PR0f94 /A3
RECEIVED
SEP 21 2010
t f -
Dartc: / f 3 C, Cr
Date. J -
Date:
Date: ` L U_ ft Q
Date: �?
Date;