05/09/2023 - City Council Special
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY
MAY 9, 2023
5:30 P.M.
EAGAN ROOM – EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
AGENDA
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
III. WINTER TRAIL MAINTENANCE
IV. CROSSWALK POLICY UPDATE
V. PUBLIC WORKS 5-YEAR CIP (2024-2028)
VI. REDEVELOPMENT UPDATE
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Agenda Information Memo
May 9, 2023 Special City Council Workshop
III. Winter Trail Maintenance
Direction For Consideration:
Review and comment on potential additions/revisions to the current Level of Service for the
Winter Trail Maintenance program and direct any modifications to the June 6, 2023, regular
Council meeting for formal action.
Facts:
In 1998, the City Council adopted a Winter Trail Maintenance Plan that allows the Council
to annually review and reconsider the extent of the trail system that is designated for
maintenance during the winter months. This review has been directed to be performed
at the first available workshop after April 1 each year.
The winter trail maintenance program began by incorporating 56 miles of a 110 miles trail
system to be completed utilizing contractual services.
As the City's trail system has continued to grow along with the public's acceptance of the
program, the program has been reviewed almost annually to respond to new trail
construction and petitioned requests for added segments to be maintained.
Subsequent City Councils have added to the original system plan in response to citizen
and business requests, as well as considering the merits of each new segment of trail
constructed during the previous year along collector/arterial roads.
The current program consists of 86.6 maintained miles out of a total 131.7 miles
transportation trail system (66%) and is maintained completely with City staff and
equipment. An additional 5.86 miles of boulevard, facility, and parks trails and sidewalks
are also maintained by a combination of staff, adjacent property owners, and school
districts.
On April 17, 2018, the City Council approved revisions to the Winter Trail Maintenance
Policy authorizing administrative decisions of petitioned requests based on current policy
criterion. An appeal process is provided for unique circumstances once annually.
In the past year, the City did not receive any formal citizen petition which met the criteria
of the Winter Trail Maintenance Policy. No additional, formal citizen petitions were
received in the past year.
City staff recommends the consideration of new construction (NC) trail segments that
have been, or will be, constructed after Fall of 2022, including any new construction in
2023.
City staff recommends (SR) the consideration of approximately 0.46 miles of trail
segments in recognition of additional pedestrian accessibility and connectivity needs
which meet the criteria of the Winter Trail Maintenance Policy.
With Council direction, these additional 0.69 miles of trails and sidewalk would be added
to the 2023-2024 Winter Trail Maintenance Plan.
Attachments: (7)
III-1 Staff Memo
III-2 Overall Considerations Map
III-3 New Construction Consideration Map
III-4 Staff Recommendation Maps
III-5 Current Winter Trail Maintenance Routes Map
III-6 Transportation Trails Not Currently Plowed Map
III-7 Full Transportation Trail Map
Memo
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
c/o Diane Miller, City Administrator
Russ Matthys, Director of Public Works
From: Jeff Brooker, Superintendent of Streets and Fleet
Date: May 4, 2023
Subject: Winter Trail Maintenance Program
Consideration of Additional Segments
In accordance with the City’s Winter Trail Maintenance Program, City staff performs an annual
review of petitions received and new construction recently completed or occurring during the
current year. Relative to petitions, the adopted Winter Trail Maintenance Policy states that no
public request for additions to the Winter Trail Maintenance Policy will be considered unless
accompanied by a petition of 50 properties lying within ½ mile of the segment to be considered.
All requests/petitions must be submitted in writing by April 1st. They will then be reviewed by
City staff and an administrative decision will be made based on current policy criterion. Those
meeting criteria will be presented to the Council at the next available Council Workshop with
formal action taken at a subsequent regular Council meeting for possible inclusion into the
following season’s program.
There is one (1) New Construction (NC#1) area for staff to review, and two (2) Staff
Recommendations (SR#1-2) segments. There were not any Citizen Petitions received in 2022-
2023. Staff recommends considering adding the following segments and is forwarding them to
the Council for formal addition to the 2023-2024 Winter Trail Maintenance Program. If all
segments are approved, this would be an increase of 0.69 miles to our Winter Trail Maintenance
Program.
New Construction (NC)
1. New Construction - (NC #1)
There is (1) New Construction area for consideration:
NC#1
There is one (1) segment in the New Construction category:
• West side of Nicols Road – Diffley Road to Gloria Drive – 8’ bituminous trail. – 1,196 ft (0.23
miles) – recommended priority level 2 (Criteria #2,5, & 6).
Page 2
Rationale: As adjacent land use continues to develop into a variety of residential and commercial
uses (i.e., retail, high density housing) and there are increasing needs for pedestrian accessibility.
Based on new trail construction and construction of new high-density housing, there is adequate
development to justify plowing the new trail section along Nicols Road.
Additional segment quantities 1,196 feet (0.23 miles) (see map)
Additional estimated annual cost $ 198 ($862/mile, 5-year average cost)
Staff Recommendation (SR)
2. Staff Recommendation - (SR #1,2)
Staff annually reviews our Winter Trail Maintenance Program to help ensure safety and adequate
connectivity within the current level of service parameters. Therefore, staff is recommending the
following segments be formally added to the Winter Trail Maintenance Plan:
SR#1
The first Staff Recommendation segment in this category:
• South side of Red Pine Lane – MN Hwy 3 to Biscayne Ave – 8’ bituminous trail –653 feet
(0.12 miles) – recommend priority level 1 (Criteria #3, 4, & 6)
Rationale: Provides additional safety, and connectivity to trail plowed by Dist. 196 for School
Walking Route.
Additional segment quantities 653 feet (0.12 miles) (see map)
Additional estimated annual cost $ 103 ($862/mile, 5-year average cost)
SR#2
The second Staff Recommendation segment in this category:
• West side of Ames Crossing Road – Vikings Parkway to O’Neill Drive – 8’ bituminous – 1,805
feet (0.34 miles) – recommend priority level 2 (Criteria 2 & 6)
Rationale: As adjacent land use continues to develop into a variety of residential and
commercial uses (i.e., retail, restaurants, and hotel) there are increasing needs for
pedestrian accessibility. In 2017 Council had requested staff to review this section of trail as
development occurs in this area. There is currently adequate development to justify plowing
the west side of Ames Crossing Road.
Additional segment quantities 1805 feet (0.34 miles) (see map)
Additional estimated annual cost $ 293 ($862/mile, 5-year average cost)
Page 3
Criteria
The following criteria will be used to determine whether a segment of sidewalk and/or
trailway should be included in the winter trail maintenance program:
1. Trails along Major Arterial Roads. These are thoroughfare roads with 4+ traffic lanes, traffic
volumes greater than 5,000 vehicles per day and speed limits of 45 mph or greater.
2. Trails along Community Collectors. These are thoroughfare roads with 2 traffic lanes (with
safety lanes/shoulders) or 4 full lanes of traffic with volumes greater than 3,000 vehicles per
day and speed limits from 35-45 mph.
3. Trails along Neighborhood Collector Streets. These are local streets approximately 1 mile
in length with 2 traffic lanes (with safety lanes/shoulders), traffic volumes less than 3,000
vehicles per day and speed limits of 35 mph or greater.
4. Local School Walking Routes. These are trails and sidewalks that are relied upon by the
school districts for designated walkers under their bus transportation policy.
5. Transit Routes. These are trails and sidewalks that are located along scheduled transit
routes with designated transit stops (i.e., signs, shelters, benches, or stations) maintained by
the MVTA and are also located within or adjacent to high density residential areas, retails
centers or high-density employment centers.
6. Other. The Council’s discretion will be used to designate other segments as necessary to
provide continuity, designated recreational loops, etc.
Priority Criteria:
The following criteria will be used to determine trail plowing priorities:
1. Priority Level 1 Trails. City Facilities used by the Public, along with those trails and
sidewalks that are relied upon by the school districts for designated walkers under their
bus transportation policy that have been specifically pre-approved by the City Council.
2. Priority Level 2 Trails. Trails and sidewalks which serve higher density residential areas,
transit routes adjacent to higher density residential areas and/or multi-modal inter-
community connections.
3. Priority Level 3 Trails. Trails and sidewalks which are located in commercial areas or
connect adjacent higher density residential areas to commercial areas.
4. Priority Level 4 Trails. Trails which do not qualify as Priority Levels 1, 2, or 3.
5. Partial trail segments. Which fulfill the above criteria may be extended to provide
connectivity and/or operational efficiencies.
CLIFF RD
DIFFLEY RD
YANKEE DOODLE RD
H
W
Y
1
4
9
LEXINGTON AVE
PILOT KNOB RD
HWY 77
HWY 13
I - 35E
HWY 55
I - 494
PILOT KNOB RD
CLIFF RD
LONE OAK RD
NC#1
SR#1
SR#2
Date: 4/17/23Prepared by: City of Eagan Street Dept., SPFile: L:\users\pubworks\streets\Plowing\Trails\NewTrailPlowingConsiderations\23-24\8x11_routeconsiderations_23-24.mxd
0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Feet
Plowed In 2022-23
Winter Trail & Sidewalk Maintenance
Route Considerations for 2023-2024
New Construction - NC #1
Staff Recomendation - SR #1, 2
Citizen Petition
Medical/Grocery
Accessabiliy
Diffley Road (Co Rd 30)
Nicols Rd
Glory DrNew Construction #1
Nicols Road - Diffley Rd to Glory Dr West Side - 10' Bituminous
Proposed Trail - 1,196 ft (.23 mi)
0 175 350 Feet
Request NC#1 for 2023-2024 Winter Trail Maintenance - April 18, 2023
Other Currently Plowed Segments
Winter Trail Maintenance Consideration Location
Currently NOT Plowed Existing Trails
Recommended Priority Level 2
MN Hwy 3
R e d P in e L a n e
Biscayne Ave
AveryPines
Red PineElementary
Staff Recommendation #1
Red Pine Lane - MN Hwy 3 to Biscayne Ave South side - 8' Bituminous
Proposed Trail - 653 ft (.12 mi)
0 75 150 Feet
Request SR#1 for 2023-2024 Winter Trail Maintenance - April 18, 2023
Segments currently plowed by City staff
Winter Trail Maintenance Consideration Location
Currently NOT Plowed Existing Trails
Recommended Priority Level 1
Segments currently plowed by ISD 196 staff
Vikings Parkway
L
o
n
e
Oak
Parkway
AmesCrossingRoad
O'Neill Dr
Staff Recommendation #2
Ames Crossing Road - Vikings Pkwy to O'Neill Dr West Side - 8' Bituminous
Proposed Trail - 1,805 ft (.34 mi)
0 200 400 Feet
Request SR#2 for 2023-2024 Winter Trail Maintenance - April 18, 2023
Other Currently Plowed Segments
Winter Trail Maintenance Consideration Location
Currently NOT Plowed Existing Trails
Recommended Priority Level 2
B A L D
E A G L E
C T .
MATTHEW CT.
HALITE
LN.
P
U
M
I
C
E
C
T
.
BLKHWK.
L A K E DR.
SUNRISE
R O AD
YORKT OWN DR.
L
E
XI
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
.
BEAM
LN.
ORION
LN.
RED PINE LN.
WALFRID
ST.
SYCAMORE
DR.
DRESDEN
CT.
RD.
P
A
L
O
MIN
O
T
R.
McFADDENS
T R .
QUAIL
CREEK
CIR.
CANARY
WAY
PINE
CONE
CIR.
OAKBROOKE
WAY
J O H N N Y
CAKE
R D G
RD
THOMAS
LN.
C H E S M A R
L N .
A
R
G
E
N
T
A
T
R
AIL
BRENTWOOD LN.
CHAPEL
CT.
WESTCHESTER
CIR.
NEW
YORK
AVE.
O L D S I B L E Y
H W Y .
W O O D LA N D
TR.
LONE OAK ROAD
MALMO
PL.
R.CT.
QUARTZ LN.
BLUE JAY
WAY
CENTURY
PT.
CLEMSON
CT.
YORKTOWN PLACE
H A C K MORE
DR.
M I C A
T R A I L
L O N D O N
L N .
81st
ST.
KENNET
CIR.
S.H.
CIR.
FLINT
DR.
120th ST.W.
CLIFF RD.
KEEFE ST.
BLACKHAWK
PT.
TIFFANY
PL.
ERIE
CT.
RAHNCLIFF
RD.
KARIS
W A Y
LAKESIDE
CT.
SHERMAN
CT.
OAKBRK.
ALCOVE
CLINTON
TR.
O A K
C T .
OAK
CHASE
RD.
ALDRIN DR.
D
R
.N
C
HESHIR
E
CT.
BRIARWD
LN.
MARILYN
AVE.
INTERLACHEN
DR.
GRACE
DR.
FOX
RIDGE
RD.
PACIFIC
AVE.
BROOKVIEW
CT.
P.SIDE
CT.
PARK CENTER
DR.
COVENTRY
P K W Y .
B
.
R
I
D
G
E
C
I
R
.
GAB.CIR.
C A R I B O U
L N.
E
L
R
E
N
E
R
D
.
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
G
LA
CIE
RD
R.
AMARYLLIS
LN.
LEXINGTON
WAY
K
U
T
O
F
F
C
T
.
KNOLL
RIDGE
DR.
CROSS
ROAD
CT.
N
O
R
.C
T
.
WALNUT CT.
E .BALSAM
TR.
N .
R O G E R S
C T .
N I C O L S R O A D
HIGHCROFT
CT.
TRILLIUM CT.
THORWOOD CT.
R
D
G
.
RD.
EAGAN DALE
BLV D.
TOWN
CENTRE
DR .
SAFARI
CT.S.
WINDSOR
CT.
BROCKTON
CURVE
F O U R S E A S O N S C T.
PENKWE
WAY
L
I
M
O
N
I
T
E
FAWN
R
I
D
G
E
T
R
.
SIGFRID ST.
STEPHANIECIR.
SKYLINE RD
WESTON
DEERWOOD DR.
DEERCLIFF L N .
TR
OTTER
S
RIDGE
DONALD
AVE.
LONE OAK ROAD
WAY
KRESTWOOD
LN.
77th ST.W.
N
O
RTHB
R.
CT.
L A K E P A R K
C T .
RD.
STONE
VIENNA LANE P O N D-
VIE W
D R.
SER.
CIR.CRESTVIEWLN.
MURPHY
PARKWAY
D E E R W O O D
TRAIL
M ALLA R D
PL.
W O O D G A T E
L N .
LETENDRE ST.
FOUR OAKS RD.
WILDFL.
WAY
HAVENHILL
CIR.
LANCASTER
LN.
PIN
E
T
R
E
E
CUR.TAMIE
AVE.
ARGENTA
TR.
H I C K O R Y
H IL L
HOSFORD
HILLS
DR.
WILLOW
WAY
R O L L I N G
H I L L S P L .
C O U G A R
D R .
NESTLING
CIR.
LY R A
C T.
GUN
CLUB RD.
W.BURY
PATH
N E W T O W N
C T.
DEERWOOD DRIVE
VERSAILLES
CT.
SERPENTINE
DR.
B
.
R
D
G
.R
D
.
WELLINGTONCT.
S
T
A
T
E
S
W.R.CIR.
GOLDEN
M
E
A
D
O
W RD.
C A M B E R W
E
L
L
METCALF
DR.
MAJESTIC
OAKS
PL.
F A L C O N WAY
C
O
M
A
N
C
H
E
R
D.
JENNIFER
CT.
B L U E H E R O N
C T .
MAPLE
LEAF
CIR.
V.
CT.
C
O
M
M
E
R
S
DRIVE
SUNWOOD
CT.SOUTH
HILLS LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
STPLCHASE
CIR.
OAKLEAF
CIR.
ATLANTIC HILL
DR.
AIDAN CV.
BAYBERRY LN.
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
E
.
PINTAIL
CT.
WOODLAND
WAY
BEAR
PATH TR.
MACLAREN
PL.
S K Y W O O D
L N.
B LA C K H A W K
C O V E
WATERVIEW
TR.
NOKIA
W
A
Y
GREAT OAKSLN.
K I N G S
C R E S T
L N .GIBRALTAR
TR.
BROOKLYN L N .
CLIFFHILL
L
N.
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
CT.
A V A L O N
PATH
N.HAY LAKE
RD.
GOLD
TR.
S A F A R I H
EIG
H
T
S
TR.
CAMELBACKDR.
LOON
LN.
S.R U B Y
C T.
PARK
PL.
BLACK
WOLF
RUN
TACONITE TR.
G.B
O
R
O
C
T.
NORTHWD
CIR.
JEFFERSON
LANE
BLUE
JAY WAY
C
L
I
F
F
RIDGE
CT.
CENTER
CT.
WREN
LN.
CLARK ST.
TOPAZ
DR.
ROYALE DR.
EGAN
LAKEVIEW
T
R.
W E X F O R D
C T.
ALICIA
DR.
Q
U
A
I
L
RDG
RD.
LN
BO
R
CHERT
LN.
GRAND
OAK
CIR.
N.
N.
ALEXANDER
RD.
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
P
R
A
I
R
IE
CIR.
W.
JOHNNY CAKEALCOVE
S.
HAY
L
K
CLIFF ROAD
KIN
G
S
W
O
O
D
R D .
CURRY
TR.
JADE LN.
DRWD
PATH
WOODGATE
PT.
O
N
Y
X
P
T
.
PRAIRIEDUNESWAY
S.
CT.
GARNET
DR.
SURREY
H E I G H T S DR.
HAV EN H I L L
R D .
RIVERTON AVE.
DR.
McKEE ST.
ESK
CIR.
S
E
N
E
C
A
R
D.
AMBER
DR.
EASTER LN.
YANKEE DR.
S K Y L I N E
C T .
STORLAND
CT.
WHISP.
CT.
W
I
N
D
TR.
B B .KN O L L
N
O
R.
CIR.
H I C K O R Y
H I L L
JADE PT.
PINE
RIDGE
DR.
DR.
N.B
.
W
A
T
E
RD
R
.
O
A
K
CLIFF
D R .
LEXINGTON
POINTE P A R K W A Y
LEONARD
LN.
NORTHWOOD
PKWY.
P E N K W E WAY
TIM BER
W
O
LFT
R.
AUTUMNCIR.
CLE
M
SO
N DR.
KNOB
DR.
THOMAS
CENTER D R .
W N D T R .
K N O L L
RED
OAK
DR.
BEACON
HILL
R D .
ALLAN
LN.
ENGLERT ROAD
WINDTREE DR.
( CO. RD. 31 )
C
A
N
T
E
R
G
L
E
N
D
R
.
O
A
K
P
O
N
D
C
I
R
.
HIGHVIEW AVE.
BRDGVW
AVE.
DAVENPORT
AV.
PRINCETON
CIR.
D E N M A R K
C T .W .
MOONSTONE
DR.
ST.E.
OAK
WAY
BERKSHIRE DR.
KAUFMANIS
WAY
HARBOURPT.
(CO.RD.32 )CLIFF ROAD
WALNUT
LA
N
E
PROMENADE
AVE.
RD.
L O D E STONE
LN.
SUMMIT
PASS
E A G A N D A L E
C T.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
W.R.CT.
S H O RT
LIN E
S
HA
W
NEE
R
D.
BURNSIDE
A V E .
IVY CT.
HUNT DR.
HEINE
STRASSE
B R A D F O R D
P L .
PILOT
KNOB
RD.
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
CLIFFROAD
BASSWOOD
LN.
WNDTR
CT.
LUNAR
LN.
CIVIC C E NTE R
DR.
WEDGWOOD LN.
SOUTH
VALLEY
DIAMOND
D
R
.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
RICHARD
LN.
S T O N E W O O D R D .
HILLSIDE
DRIVE
MEADOWLARKRD.
S TA N WIX R D.
L
A
K
E
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
.
DUN.
CIR.
SEAN CT.
ROSA
CT.
VIOLET
LANE
D O L O M IT E
D R .
BISCAYNE
AVE.
GREENLEAF DR.N.
WESTBURY
KNOLL
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
W
.
SILVER BELL RD.
TWINS
CT.
P
T
E
.
W
A
Y
F O X M O O R E
C T .
DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C T .
BOA RD WALK
CHERRYWOOD
CT.
TR.
McFA
DDENS
TR.
AVALON
CT.
D
O
R
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
C
T
.
PUMICE
PT.
G .B O R O
L N.
S L A T E R
RD.
RAHN
WAY
DENMARK
CT.E.
WDCRST
CIR.
TICONDEROGA TR.
CUTTERS LN.
RED
P
I
N
E
CT.
H
O
RIZON
CIR.
LONE OAK ROAD
ARBOR
CT.
E A S T
P O N D R D .
WHISPERING
WAY R O Y A L E
P L .
ST.
ANDREW
BLVD
G L E N F I E L D
C T.
P I N E T R E E
TRAIL
BEVERLY
DR.
ALISON
W
AY
MILL RUN
CIR.
NEIL
ARMSTRONG
BLVD.
T U R Q U O I S E
T R .
NICOLS
ROAD
DUCK
WOOD
D
R.
OPAL
PL.
T E R R A C E
SUMBR. CT.
DODD
ROAD
HAUGE
CIR.
K I N G S W O O D
L N .
DANIEL
DRIVE
CASHELL
G
L
E
N
MAHOGANY
WAY
WINGED
FOOTTR
HICKORY
LN.
DR .
LAUREL
CT.
MICHIGANCT.
DENMARK
AVE.
FIRST
ST.
TYNE LN.
HILLTOP
LN.
T I F F A N Y
C I R .S .
CLEOME LN.
CENTRAL
PKWY.
DR.
WHISP.
TR.
N
O
RTHVIE
W DR.
TROTTERS
CT.
K E N N E B E C
D RIVE
LIMESTONE
DR.
PENN SYL
V
A
N
I
A
AVE.
CLIFF
LAKE
ROAD
WILDERNESS
PARKCIR.
BB.CIR.
OLI
V
I
N
E D
R
.
SHER.
CT.
T
A
M
P
E
R
E
C
I
R
.
LN.
WATERFOR
D
DR.
W.
TIM B E R
W O LF
C T.
SHALE LN.
SVENSK
LN.
WLNT
CIR.
WDTHRSH
CT.
PRAIRIE
CIR.E.
WIND MILL
CT.
WELLANDCT.
B. CT.
P
A
LIS
A
D
E
P
T.
CRESTRIDGE
DR.
F A R N U M DR.
TRAMORE
PL.
SHERWOOD WAY
THOMAS
LAKE
R
O
A
D
M A J E S T I C
O A K S C T .
HIG H SITE DR.
REDOAK
CT.
BHWK.
CIR.
SLATERCT.
VIBURNUM TR.
RED FOX
R
D
.
MONTEREY LN.
CORP.
CENT.
DR.
HILLS
DR.
SAVANNAH
R
D.
F AIR H A V E N
R D.
BRIDGEVIEW
TERR.
D E N M A R K
T R .W .
(CO.RD.28 )
EAGANDALE
BLVD.
TEAL
COVE
N.H A Y
L A K E
R D .
KIRSTEN
CT.
BLAC
K
OAK
DR.
TAC.
PT.
NANCY
CIR.
KIRKWD
DR.
OVERLOOK PL.
ERIN
LN.
G
.
L
E
A
F
W.
SKATER
CIR.
D
U
C
K
W
O
O
DT
R
.
B LUESTONE DR.E.
CLOVER
LN.
W
EXFORD
WAY
AQUARIUS LN.
L A K E V I E W
CUR.
ASHBURY
ROAD
DARTMOUTH
CT.
P
U
M
I
C
E
LN.
THAMESCIR.
RIVTN.CIR.
SUN
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
.
PONDEROSACIR.
M c C A R T H Y
R D .
GRANITE
CT.
AS
H
BURY
PL.
CAYLIN
CT.
SKY
LINE
PATH
OXFORD
RD.PENNSYLVANIA
AVALON AVE.
PINE
LANE
ISABELLE
CT.
VILDMARKDR.
OAKB R K C T.
A M B E R LEAF
TR.
ALDER
LN.
S T P L C H A S E
C T.
CHES
MAR
DR.
DAKOTA
P AT H
SADDLE
WOOD
DRIVE
GREAT
OAKS
TR.
JURDY
RO
AD
L.POLE CT.
COPPER
LN.
WALNUT RDG DR.
TIF
F
A
N
Y
C
T.
FORGE
PL
LONE
OAK
CIR.
B
I
G
T
I
M
B
E
R
TR.
K I N G S W O O D
SUNCRST
CT.
DR.
P.RIDGE
CT.
JOYCE
CT.
MILLRUN
CT.
GREENSBORO
D
RIVE
GEMINI RD.
ESTATES
DR.
ROYALE
TRAIL
RICHARD'S
CT.
N.
R U B Y CT.O A K B R K
C I R .
WILDERNESS
LN.
TILBURY
WAY
BLKHRIDGEPL.
P L A Z A
DR.
WIDGEON
WAY
NORWEST
CT.
B O S T O N
CIR.
B
L
U
E
W
A
T
E
R
R
D.
WAVENEYCT.
TOFTE
LN.
BAYLORCT.
JADE
LN.
GENEVA
LN.
FOXRIDGE
CT.
RAINIER
LN.
ASHBURY
CT.
TERRA GLENN
CT.
DENMARK
A V E.
GOVERN
CIR.
S H E F .
C I R .
SUMMER
PL.
LEMIEUX CIR.
GARNET
PT.
DUNROVIN
LANE
RASPBERRYLN.
RED CEDAR RD.
KENNETH ST.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
S
P
R
I
N
G
W
D
P
A
T
H
MALLARD
CIR.
DIAMOND
DR.
LA NTE R N
CT.
RIDGE
CLIFFE
DR.
PELLO CIR.
S.
T R E N T O N
T R A I L
N A R VIK
CT.
CONEFLOWER CT.
CT.
D O N A L D
C T.
GALAXIE
AVE.
TOWN
CENTRE DR.
MARIE CT.
C
I
N
N
A
B
A
R
DR.
S.
MALLARD TR.
CAMPTONCT.
AVE.
PIN OAK DR.
C.GLEN
CIR.
R
O
BIN
L
N.
LYNX
CT.
C E D A R G R O V E P K W Y
TURQ.
CIR.MONTICELLO
AVE.
BALSAM ST.
STIRRUP
ST.
( CO. RD. 30 )
L
E
N
O
R
E
LN.
M A N O R
DR.
NO.
HAWK
PL.
STPLCHASE
WAY
WHITE PINE WAY
BRIAR CREEK RD.B.RDG.
RD.
TIMBER
SHORE
LN.
B R D G
WINDCREST
AVE.
CAMBRIDGE
DR.
SANDSTONE
DR.
NYBRO
CIR.
DEERWOOD
PL.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
COURTHOUSE
LN.
S K Y V I E W
C T .
CANVASBACK
LN.
B L K H W K
R I D G E
W A Y
(CO.RD.26 )
VIKINGS PKWY
GALWAY
LN.
BRISTOL
B L V D .
SKYLINE DR.
B.RDG.
RD.
W O R .
C I R .
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
AVON
CT.
WESCOTT RD.
R
O
Y
A
L
E
C T.
STPL
C
H
A
S
E
L
N.
M I C H E L L E DR.
B R I D L E R D G .
RD.
BROWN BEAR TR.
WILD ERNESS
CU RV E
SHERWOOD
WAY
CANTEBURY
CIR.
HANOVERCT.
TRAIL
CT.
VIL A S
LN.
ACORN
ST.
LODGEPOLE
DR.
G R A NIT E
DR.
CARNELIAN LN.
W A L N U T LANE
CLEMSON
CIR.
HAW T H O R N E
W
O
O
D
S
DR.
CAM BER W E L L
AMES
C R O S SIN G R D.
CINNABAR
CT.
BEAVER
D A M
RD.
SAWGRASS
TRL
S.
V
E
N
T
N
O
R AVE.
W
I
L
D
E
R
NESS RUN D R .
LOUIS
LN.
CT.
LIN DEN
LN.
S.HAY LAKE
R D.
KINGLET
CT.
J
U
R
D
Y
C
T.
N
O
.
S
O
.
RITA CT.
J.C.R.L N.
SHELERUD
DR.
JOHNNY
CAKE
RDG
RD.
CRIMSON LEAF TR.
FEDERAL
DR.
W.BURY
LN.
CHES
MAR
CIR.
BLKHWK
RIDGE CT.
WOODLAND
CT.
VIK I N G S
PK W Y
SEVERN
WAY
FROMME
CT.
TANGLEWOOD CT.
SENJA
CT.
C
RO
OKED
STICK
CT.
O A K B R K
CUR.
NORTHWOOD PKWY.
FARM RD.
HALDEN
CIR.
PARKRIDGE D R .
P
O
N
D
S
RD.
NORTHVIEW
ST.
CHAS
PL.
EGAN
A
V
E
.
EAGLE
CREST
DR.
ZIRCON LN.
S P R U C E
C I R .
ROLL
LN.
BRIDGEWATER
DR.
BRADDOCK
TRAIL
CLIFFVIEW DR.
CLARK
CT.
T
.
H
.
7
7
SPOONBILL
CIR.
EMERALD
LN.
GRANDOAKCIR.W.
ALICIA
C
I
R
.
HILL RD.
F A L C O N
W A Y
SHEFFIELD
LN.
STONE
C
L
I
F
F
E
D
R
.
ALB
A
N
Y
CIR.
WESCOTT ROAD
SUMMER LN.
GARNET
LN.
COLUMBIA
DR.
CLUBVIEW DR.
PR AIRIE
MALLARD
CT.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
( CO. RD. 26 )
THAMES
A V E.
AMBER
CT.
PATR I CK
R O A D
GABBRO TR.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SHIELDS
DR.
BLUE
STONE
LN.
RUSTEN
RD.
MALLARD D R.
L
N
.
SAFARI
P A S S
C O V I N G T O N
LN.
P E N K W E
C I R .
O S T E R
D R
B B .C T.
E.BALSAM T R A IL
C O R N W ALLIS
C T.
RIDGE
M O N A R CH TRL
WILDFLOWER CT.
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
VIE
W
DRIVE
B A L D
L A K E
C T.
WOODLARK
LN.
B.RDG.
CIR.
RIDGEWOOD
D
R.
CALVIN
CT.
SIG N A LP T.BRADDOCK
TR.
DIAMOND
PT.
R E B E C C A
L N .
JAMES
ST.
COUNTRY
CREEK
WAY
WHITE
PINE WAY
MARICE
DR.
KETTLE
C
R
E
E
K
R
D.
M O U R N I N G
D O V E C T .
BEACONHILL
CT.
BR.
R
D
G
.
ROAD
B
R
O
C
K
T
O
N
C
I
R
.
ROLLING
HILLS CT.
ONYX
D R .
SANDSTONE
DR.
S
O
U
TH
DEERWOODCT.
BERRY
DONEGAL
CT.
STRATFORD
L N .
CAPRICORN
CT.
PINECREST
CT.
PERIDOT
P A T H
ARLENE
CT.
S I G F R I D ST.
DISC OVE RY RD
STATION TR
WEST
SERVICE
ROAD
DEER POND
CIR.
S U N R I S E
C T.
BIRCHPOND
RD.
INLAND
RD
LONE
O
AK
D
RIVE
A U G U S T A
CT.
SIBLEY
CT.
BEECHER DR.
C
A
R
L
S
O
N
LAKE
LN.
N
.
HAWKSBURY
CIR.
FEDERAL
CT.
E
A
G
A
N
D
A
L
E
C ALCITE
DR.
N O R T H V I E W
P A R K R D.
HIGH VIEW AVE.
METCALF DR.
R
V
V
L
Y
W
A
Y
BLAC K HAWK
R
D
.
HAMILTON
( CO. RD. 31 )
DOLORES
LN.
R
I
D
G
E
V
I
E
W
D
R
.
WESTBURY
WAY
KATHRYN CIR.
DEERRIDGECT.
DODD
ROAD
O'NEILL DR.
DREXEL
CT.
ROCKY LN.
DRESDEN
WAY
SHADOW
C R K CUR.
GREEN
L
E
A
F
DR.
E.
SEQUOIA
DR.
W IL L B R O O K
C T.
QUARRY
LN.
CORPORATE CENTER
D
R
.
B I R C H CRESTCIR.
OLD
SIBLEY M E M.H W Y.
COACHMAN
ROAD
CHAPEL
LN.
TRUNK
HWY
13
CINNABARDR.
W
ESC
OTT
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
.
D
E
E
R
H
I
L
L
S
T R .
RD.
BALTIC
AVE.
HUMMINGBIRDLN.
B R A N T CIR.
BENT
TREE LN.
E
T
H
A
N
DR.
DR.
CLIFF
D
R.
RAHNCLIFF
CT.
S
L
A
T
E
R
R D.
SUPERIOR
CT.
THOMAS
L
A
K
E
R
D
.
S A W G R A S S
T R L W .
J.C.R.
W
A
Y
W EST
MINSTE R
CIR.
(CO.RD.43)
AZALEA
WAY
BETTY
LN.
SALLY
CIR.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SOUTH HILLS
DR.
R U STE N R D
OAK
CHASE
LN.
DURHAM CT.B A F FI N
B A Y S.
PE BBLE
BEACH
WAY
RED
P I N E LANE
LENORE
LN.
L
O
N
E
OAK
P
A
RK
WAY
NOR
TH
RIDGE
D R .
HUNTERS
OVLK.
ERIN DR.
DUCK WOOD DR.
CEDAR RIDGE
CIR.
O
A
K
B
R
K.
S
U
M
B
R
.
P
L
.
PARK
S
I
D
E
CIR.
HAZELTINE
LN.
MERSEY
PT.
A D V A N T A G E
L N .
HIDDEN
MEADOWTR.
W A L L
S T .
WALNUT L N .
K
I
R
K
W
O
O
D
D
R.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
O A K
POND
R
D
.
WILDERNESS RUN RD.
TOWERVIEW RD.
GREATOAKS
CIR.
T I F FA N Y DR.
TANANGER
CT.
DIAMOND
DR.
E A G A N
O U T L E T S
P K W Y
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
WILD ROSE CT.
N.NYBRO
LN.
BR A DD OC K
TRAIL
CHIPMUNK CT.
N O R W O O D
D R .
V
E
R
M
O
N
T
A
V
E
.TERR.
DENMARK
AVE.
F
L
O
R
A
D
R
.
TRAPP ROAD
MARBLELN.
S A F A RI
C T.N .
COVINGTON LN.
CARLSON LAKE
LN.
BLUEBERRY
LN.
OAKS
CAST
LET
O
N
CT.
AMES
CROSSING
RD.
B
I
R
C
H
P
O
N
D
R
D
.
GARDEN
TR.
W
E
D
G
WOOD
DR.
POPPLER
LANE
R E I N DEER
LN.
ALDEN
POND
LN.
SYCAMORE CT.
AUTUMN
COURT
BLACKHAWK
RD.
STONY POINTRD.
WESCOTT SQ.
JAMES S T .
KINGS RD.
COCHRANE
AVE.
W
A
Y H O R S E S H O E
C I R .
WALDEN
DR.
ARGENTA
TR.
W O R C H E ST E R
D R.
LYNX
C T .
G.M.
CT.
LAKE
PARKCIR.
BLUE C R O S S R O A D GOLFVIEW D R.
O
'
L
E
A
R
Y
L
N
.
KYLLO LN.
WESTON
HILLS
CT.
DANBURY
T R.
OPPERMAN DR.
SOUTHRIDGE
AVE.
ARIES
CT.
MAGNETITE
PT.
(CO.RD.30 )
B.
CIR.
W
O
O
D
G
A
T
E
P
T
.
SILVER
BELL
CIR.
J
A
S
P
E
R DR.
RIVERTON
AVE.
C H A T T E R T O N
C T .
CLOVER
LN.
HACKMORE
CT.
S.H.
WAY
WEXFORD
CIR.
G R E E N L E A F DR.
S.
E
R
I
N
DR.
ELRENE
CT.
HAMILTON D R.
CORAL LN.
JOURDAN
C T.
BEAR PATH TR.
SU N S E T
D R .
B L A C K H A W K
HILLS RD.
MAPLE TRAIL
CT.
C
O
C
H
.
AVE.
B R OO KLYN
CT.
CORPORATE
CENTER CURVE
W.BURY
T R.
SPRUCE ST.
KIRKWD
CIR.
COPPER
PT.
BLA
C
K
HA
W
K
R
D.GREATOAKS
PL.
RUSTIC
HILLS DR.
WILDFL.
LN.
WESTBURY
DR.
LEGENDS CT.
BADGER
CT.
QUARRY
CT.
O A K B R K TR.
TRENTON
ROAD
WOOD CLIFF
CT.
BIRCHPOND
PL.
R O Y ALE
W AY
ANDREW
ST.
RANDOM
RD.
GADWALL
CT.
CARNELIAN
LN.
SOUTH
H.CT.
SCOTT
T
R.
WATERS
ROAD
TIFFANY
PT.HAYLAKE
CT.
DIFFLEY RD.
GOLD
PT.
MARSH
CT.
NOKIA
WAY
BRAUN
CT.
SUNWOOD
TR.
PRINCETON
TR.
OVER
LOOK
C T .
WENZEL
AVE.
JACOB
CT.
STORLAND RD.
O A K C H A S E
C I R .
CROSS R
D.
SAWGRASS
TRL E.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
A U B U R N
C T .
B E A VERDAM
R
D
.
OAKBRK
D R .
KNOTTINGHAM
CIR.
PARKCLIFF
D
R.
BLUE GENTIAN
RD.
HOPE DR
ESK LN.
LAKEVIEW
CURVE
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
D
R
.
MERGANSER
CT.
MED
ARY
AVE.
120th ST.
BOSTON
CT.
BLUEJAY
CT.
WESCOTT
WOODLANDS
P A R K K N O L L
D R.
CLEMSON
DR.
BAFFIN BAY
N
I
C
O
L
S
R
D
.
S
A
FA
R
IC
I
R
.
N.
MALMO
LN.
TOWERVIEW RD.
SAPPHIRE
LN.
S
T
R
A
W
BERRY LN.
D O N EGAL
WOODS CT.
DRAKE
DR.
L
I
V
I
N
G
S
T
ON
DR
CARNELIAN LN.
HAVEN
WDS. CT.
OAK
C
H
A
S
E
WAY
TRUNK
HWY
3
SUDBERRY
LANE
PROMONTORYPL.
WOLFBERRY
CT.
SIBLEY
HILLS
DR.
L
A
N
T
E
R
N
L
N.
F L I C K E R
C I R
SPRING
WOOD
CT.
BEATRICE ST.
N.
S T O N E B R .
N
A
R
VIK
D
R.
WIND
TR.
TIMBER W
OLF
TR.
WESCOTT
CIR.
WHITE
OAK
CT.
COUNTRYSIDE
DVNPT.
CIR.
MALLARD
VIEW
AVE.
YANKEE PL.
R
O
S
E
M
A
R
Y
C
T
.
CHATTERTON
TRVLRS
TR.
HOLIDAY LN.
T U R Q.P T .
B
U
R
R
OAK
S
T
.
MALMO
CIR.
E.BALSAM
ST.
WINDCREST CT.
WELLINGTON
WAY
SWEETST.
PLACE
C
.
G
L
E
N
L
N
.
DANBURYCT.
W N D T R
C I R .
LAKE
P
A
R
K
DR.
W
OODGATELN.W O O D G A T E
C T .
D U C K W O OD TR.
L O D E STONECIR.
R M NGTN CT.
COVINGTON LN.
ANDROMEDA
WAY
L E O
C T.
AUGUSTA
LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
W
H
I
T
E
T
A
I
L
W
A
Y
A
M
B
E
R
D
R.
MEADOW VIEW RD.
SKYLINE
DR.
DENMARK
TR.E.
EASTER
L N .
S
T
O
N
E
CLIFFE
DR.
APENINE
WAY
TYNE LN.
B.RDG.
RD.
PINETREE PASS
DIFFLEY ROAD
EDEN
CIR.
HEMLOCK
CIR.
JESSICA
CT.
K E N N E B E C
DR.
CINNAMON
R I D G E
TR.
L E X I N G TO N
R I D G E
EAGAN
WOODS
DR.
D U N BERRY
LN.
HILLSIDE
CT.
ST
N
W
D.C
T.
C.L E A F
C T.
LIN
D
E
N
C
T.
EAGLE
PT.DR.PINECONE
TR.
B
E
A
V
E
R
D
A
M
CT.
CARDINAL W A Y
COACHMAN
RD.
MARICE
CT.
DENMARKAVE.
JUSTICE
WAY
HYL
A
N
DC
T.
HACKMORE DR.
JOHNNYCAKE
RIDGECT.
GREYSTONE
RIDGE
W
ATER VIEWCOVE
WEDGWOOD LN.NORTH
W.BURYCIR.
IV
Y LANE
PADDOCK
CT.
OVERHILL RD.
BURGUNDY
DR.
APOLLO ROAD
DEERWOOD DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C I R .
MERSEY
WAY
JAMIE
ROSE CT.
L A K E S I D E
DR.
HEINE
CT.
BARROW
CT.
PUMICE
LN.
RED
P
O
L
L
C
T.
B
A
M
B
L
ECIR.
WOODLAND TR.
CLIPPERS
RD.
NORTHVIEW
TERR.
NORTHVIEW PARK RD.
KOLSTAD
LN.
BISCAYNE
AV
E
.
ESK L N .
SILVER
BELL
R
O
A
D
BLACKHAWKLAKEPL.
FAIRWAY
HILLS
DR.
EASTWOOD
CT.
FLINTLN.
BERYL
R O A D
MILL
RUN
LN.
MIKE
COLLINS
DR.
O
A
K
B
R
K
L
N.
E L LIE
C T.
CURRY
TR.
K N O L L W D
C T.
CLIFFVIEW
DR.
K.W.
CT.
KITTIWAKE
CIR.
CHESTNUT
P A R K V I E W LN.
GLORY DR.
OPALDR.
S B R K .
C I R .
CYPRESS
PT.INTERLACHEN D R
H
E
A
T
H
E
R
D R .
STONE
BR. CIR.
THOMAS LN.
TYNECT.
DIFFLEY ROAD
KIN G S T O N
C T.
C
H
A
T
H
A
M
R
D
.
KOLSTAD
RD.
WARRICK
CT.
COSMOS LN.
QUARRY
RD.
HIGHVW
TERR.
( CO. RD. 32 )
N.MALLARD
TR.
TIF F A N Y
CIR.N.
HURON
CT.
GOLD
CT.
S
A
F
A
R
I
T
R
.
BEACON
HILL
CIR.
W A S H I N G T O N
D R I V E
HACKMORE
D
R
.
DUNROVINPL.
EA
G
AN
IN
D
USTRIAL
R
O
A
D
MILL RUN
PATH
F O R S S A
W AY
THMS.
AVE.
FOUR
SEASONS DR.
W
E
S
T
AMETH
Y
S
T
L
N
.
HICKORY
H I L L
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
77thST.W.
PALISADE
CIR.
ERIK'S
BLVD.
KIN G S B U R Y
D R.
CRESTRIDGE CT.
W
I
D
GEON
WAY
HERITAGE
LN.
COUNTRY
CT.
PALIS.
WATERFORDDR.E.
SARTELL AVE.
A P PA L OO SA T R .
WITHAM
LN.
DEERCLIFFCT.
YANKEE
D
O
O
DLE
RD.
B. WAY
SHEVLIN
CT.
DEN M AR K
AVE.
R I D G E
R D .
DIFFLEY ROAD
F
A
I
R
L
A
W
N
P
L.
TODD
AVE.
WESTON
HILLS
PL.
ELRENE R D .
B
.
R
D
G
.
R
D
.
JAMES CT.
W H I T E T A IL WAY
SHALE LANE
N
.
S
V
E
N
S
K
L
N
.
ROLLING
HILLS
CIR.
W
O
O
D
D
U
C
K
C
I
R
.
W
I
L
D
P
.
C
T
.
LASSO
LN.
TAC.TR.
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
G
G
H
H
I
I
J
J
K
K
L
L
12 12
11 11
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Trails Currently Included in theWinter Trail Maintenance Program
TOTAL Trails & Sidewalks Plowed = 92.48 miles
L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\Streets\Plowing\Trails\NewTrailPlowingConsiderations\23-24\Trail Plow Routes 22_23_Current_MapA.mxd
Date Saved: 5/4/2023
0 ½1 Miles
Map A
Transportation Trails = 86.62 miles
Park/Facility/Access Trails = 5.86 miles
B A L D
E A G L E
C T .
MATTHEW CT.
HALITE
LN.
P
U
M
I
C
E
C
T
.
BLKHWK.
L A K E DR.
SUNRISE
R O AD
YORKT OWN DR.
L
E
XI
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
.
BEAM
LN.
ORION
LN.
RED PINE LN.
WALFRID
ST.
SYCAMORE
DR.
DRESDEN
CT.
RD.
P
A
L
O
MIN
O
T
R.
McFADDENS
T R .
QUAIL
CREEK
CIR.
CANARY
WAY
PINE
CONE
CIR.
OAKBROOKE
WAY
J O H N N Y
CAKE
R D G
RD
THOMAS
LN.
C H E S M A R
L N .
A
R
G
E
N
T
A
T
R
AIL
BRENTWOOD LN.
CHAPEL
CT.
WESTCHESTER
CIR.
NEW
YORK
AVE.
O L D S I B L E Y
H W Y .
W O O DLA N D
TR.
LONE OAK ROAD
MALMO
PL.
R.CT.
QUARTZ LN.
BLUE JAY
WAY
CENTURY
PT.
CLEMSON
CT.
YORKTOWN PLACE
H A C K MORE
DR.
M I C A
T R A I L
L O N D O N
L N .
81st
ST.
KENNET
CIR.
S.H.
CIR.
FLINT
DR.
120th ST.W.
CLIFF RD.
KEEFE ST.
BLACKHAWK
PT.
TIFFANY
PL.
ERIE
CT.
RAHNCLIFF
RD.
KARIS
W A Y
LAKESIDE
CT.
SHERMAN
CT.
OAKBRK.
ALCOVE
CLINTON
TR.
O A K
C T .
OAK
CHASE
RD.
ALDRIN DR.
D
R
.N
C
HESHIR
E
CT.
BRIARWD
LN.
MARILYN
AVE.
INTERLACHEN
DR.
GRACE
DR.
FOX
RIDGE
RD.
PACIFIC
AVE.
BROOKVIEW
CT.
P.SIDE
CT.
PARK CENTER
DR.
COVENTRY
P K W Y .
B
.
R
I
D
G
E
C
I
R
.
GAB.CIR.
C A R I B O U
L N.
E
L
R
E
N
E
R
D
.
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
G
LA
CIE
RD
R.
AMARYLLIS
LN.
LEXINGTON
WAY
K
U
T
O
F
F
C
T
.
KNOLL
RIDGE
DR.
CROSS
ROAD
CT.
N
O
R
.C
T
.
WALNUT CT.
E .BALSAM
TR.
N .
R O G E R S
C T .
N I C O L S R O A D
HIGHCROFT
CT.
TRILLIUM CT.
THORWOOD CT.
R
D
G
.
RD.
EAGAN DALE
BLV D.
TOWN
CENTRE
DR .
SAFARI
CT.S.
WINDSOR
CT.
BROCKTON
CURVE
F O U R S E A S O N S C T.
PENKWE
WAY
L
I
M
O
N
I
T
E
FAWN
R
I
D
G
E
T
R
.
SIGFRID ST.
STEPHANIECIR.
SKYLINE RD
WESTON
DEERWOOD DR.
DEERCLIFF L N .
TR
OTTER
S
RIDGE
DONALD
AVE.
LONE OAK ROAD
WAY
KRESTWOOD
LN.
77th ST.W.
N
O
RTHB
R.
CT.
L A K E P A R K
C T .
RD.
STONE
VIENNA LANE P O ND-
VIE W
D R.
SER.
CIR.CRESTVIEWLN.
MURPHY
PARKWAY
D E E R W O O D
TRAIL
M ALLA R D
PL.
W O O D G A T E
L N .
LETENDRE ST.
FOUR OAKS RD.
WILDFL.
WAY
HAVENHILL
CIR.
LANCASTER
LN.
PIN
E
T
R
E
E
CUR.TAMIE
AVE.
ARGENTA
TR.
H I C K O R Y
H IL L
HOSFORD
HILLS
DR.
WILLOW
WAY
R O L L I N G
H I L L S P L .
C O U G A R
D R .
NESTLING
CIR.
LY R A
C T.
GUN
CLUB RD.
W.BURY
PATH
N E W T O W N
C T.
DEERWOOD DRIVE
VERSAILLES
CT.
SERPENTINE
DR.
B
.
R
D
G
.R
D
.
WELLINGTONCT.
S
T
A
T
E
S
W.R.CIR.
GOLDEN
M
E
A
D
O
W RD.
C A M B E R W
E
L
L
METCALF
DR.
MAJESTIC
OAKS
PL.
F A L C O N WAY
C
O
M
A
N
C
H
E
R
D.
JENNIFER
CT.
B L U E H E R O N
C T .
MAPLE
LEAF
CIR.
V.
CT.
C
O
M
M
E
R
S
DRIVE
SUNWOOD
CT.SOUTH
HILLS LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
STPLCHASE
CIR.
OAKLEAF
CIR.
ATLANTIC HILL
DR.
AIDAN CV.
BAYBERRY LN.
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
E
.
PINTAIL
CT.
WOODLAND
WAY
BEAR
PATH TR.
MACLAREN
PL.
S K Y W O O D
L N.
B L A C K H A W K
C O V E
WATERVIEW
TR.
NOKIA
W
A
Y
GREAT OAKSLN.
K I N G S
C R E S T
L N .GIBRALTAR
TR.
BROOKLYN L N.
CLIFFHILL
L
N.
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
CT.
A V A L O N
PAT H
N.HAY LAKE
RD.
GOLD
TR.
S A F A R I H
EIG
H
T
S
TR.
CAMELBACKDR.
LOON
LN.
S.R U B Y
C T.
PARK
PL.
BLACK
WOLF
RUN
TACONITE TR.
G.B
O
R
O
C
T.
NORTHWD
CIR.
JEFFERSON
LANE
BLUE
JAY WAY
C
L
I
F
F
RIDGE
CT.
CENTER
CT.
WREN
LN.
CLARK ST.
TOPAZ
DR.
ROYALE DR.
EGAN
LAKEVIEW
T
R.
W E X F O R D
C T.
ALICIA
DR.
Q
U
A
I
L
RDG
RD.
LN
BO
R
CHERT
LN.
GRAND
OAK
CIR.
N.
N.
ALEXANDER
RD.
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
P
R
A
I
R
IE
CIR.
W.
JOHNNY CAKEALCOVE
S.
HAY
L
K
CLIFF ROAD
KIN
G
S
W
O
O
D
R D .
CURRY
TR.
JADE LN.
DRWD
PATH
WOODGATE
PT.
O
N
Y
X
P
T
.
PRAIRIEDUNESWAY
S.
CT.
GARNET
DR.
SURREY
H E I G H T S DR.
HAV EN H I L L
R D .
RIVERTON AVE.
DR.
McKEE ST.
ESK
CIR.
S
E
N
E
C
A
R
D.
AMBER
DR.
EASTER LN.
YANKEE DR.
S K Y L I N E
C T .
STORLAND
CT.
WHISP.
CT.
W
IN
D
TR.
B B .K N O L L
N
O
R.
CIR.
H I C K O R Y
H I L L
JADE PT.
PINE
RIDGE
DR.
DR.
N.B
.
W
A
T
E
RD
R
.
O
A
K
CLIFF
D R .
LEXINGTON
POINTE P A R K W A Y
LEONARD
LN.
NORTHWOOD
PKWY.
P E N K W E WAY
TIM BER
W
O
LFT
R.
AUTUMNCIR.
CLE
M
SO
N DR.
KNOB
DR.
THOMAS
CENTER D R .
W N D T R .
K N O L L
RED
OAK
D R.
BEACON
HILL
R D.
ALLAN
LN.
ENGLERT ROAD
WINDTREE DR.
( CO. RD. 31 )
C
A
N
T
E
R
G
L
E
N
D
R
.
O
A
K
P
O
N
D
C
I
R
.
HIGHVIEW AVE.
BRDGVW
AVE.
DAVENPORT
AV.
PRINCETON
CIR.
D E N M A R K
C T .W .
MOONSTONE
DR.
ST.E.
OAK
WAY
BERKSHIRE DR.
KAUFMANIS
WAY
HARBOURPT.
(CO.RD.32 )CLIFF ROAD
WALNUT
LA
N
E
PROMENADE
AVE.
RD.
L O D E STONE
LN.
SUMMIT
PASS
E A G A N D A L E
C T.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
W.R.CT.
S H O R T
LIN E
S
HA
W
NEE
R
D.
BURNSIDE
A V E .
IVY CT.
HUNT DR.
HEINE
STRASSE
B R A D F O R D
P L .
PILOT
KNOB
RD.
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
CLIFFROAD
BASSWOOD
LN.
WNDTR
CT.
LUNAR
LN.
CIVIC C E NTE R
DR.
WEDGWOOD LN.
SOUTH
VALLEY
DIAMOND
D
R
.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
RICHARD
LN.
S T O N E W O O D R D .
HILLSIDE
DRIVE
MEADOWLARKRD.
S TA N W IX R D.
L
A
K
E
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
.
DUN.
CIR.
SEAN CT.
ROSA
CT.
VIOLET
LANE
D O L O M IT E
D R .
BISCAYNE
AVE.
GREENLEAF DR.N.
WESTBURY
KNOLL
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
W
.
SILVER BELL RD.
TWINS
CT.
P
T
E
.
W
A
Y
F O X M O O R E
C T.
DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C T .
BOA RD WALK
CHERRYWOOD
CT.
TR.
McFA
DDEN
S
TR.
AVALON
CT.
D
O
R
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
C
T
.
PUMICE
PT.
G .B O R O
L N.
S L A T E R
RD.
RAHN
WAY
DENMARK
CT.E.
WDCRST
CIR.
TICONDEROGA TR.
CUTTERS LN.
RED
P
I
N
E
CT.
H
O
RIZON
CIR.
LONE OAK ROAD
ARBOR
CT.
E A S T
P O N D R D .
WHISPERING
WAY R O Y A L E
P L .
ST.
ANDREW
BLVD
G L E N F I E L D
C T .
P I N E T R E E
TRAIL
BEVERLY
D
R.
ALISON
W
AY
MILL RUN
CIR.
NEIL
ARMSTRONG
BLVD.
T U R Q U O I S E
T R .
NICOLS
ROAD
DUCK
WOOD
D
R.
OPAL
PL.
T E R R A C E
SUMBR. CT.
DODD
ROAD
HAUGE
CIR.
K I N G S W O O D
L N .
DANIEL
DRIVE
CASHELL
G
L
E
N
MAHOGANY
WAY
WINGED
FOOTTR
HICKORY
LN.
DR .
LAUREL
CT.
MICHIGANCT.
DENMARK
AVE.
FIRST
ST.
TYNE LN.
HILLTOP
LN.
T I F F A N Y
C I R .S .
CLEOME LN.
CENTRAL
PKWY.
DR.
WHISP.
TR.
N
O
RTHVIE
W DR.
TROTTERS
CT.
KE N N E B E C
D RIVE
LIMESTONE
DR.
PENN SYL
V
A
N
I
A
AVE.
CLIFF
LAKE
ROAD
WILDERNESS
PARKCIR.
BB.CIR.
OLI
V
I
N
E D
R
.
SHER.
CT.
T
A
M
P
E
R
E
C
I
R.
LN.
WATERFOR
D
DR.
W.
TIM BE R
W O LF
CT.
SHALE LN.
SVENSK
LN.
WLNT
CIR.
WDTHRSH
CT.
PRAIRIE
CIR.E.
WIND MILL
CT.
WELLANDCT.
B. CT.
P
A
LIS
A
D
E
P
T.
CRESTRIDGE
DR.
F A R N U M DR.
TRAMORE
PL.
SHERWOOD WAY
THOMAS
LAKE
R
O
A
D
M A J E S T I C
O A K S C T .
HIG H SITE DR.
REDOAKCT.
BHWK.
CIR.
SLATERCT.
VIBURNUM TR.
RED FOX
R
D
.
MONTEREY LN.
CORP.
CENT.
DR.
HILLS
DR.
SAVANNAH
R
D.
F AIR H A V E N
R D.
BRIDGEVIEW
TERR.
D E N M A R K
T R .W .
(CO.RD.28 )
EAGANDALE
BLVD.
TEAL
COVE
N.H A Y
L A K E
R D .
KIRSTEN
CT.
BLAC
K
OAK
DR.
TAC.
PT.
NANCY
CIR.
KIRKWD
DR.
OVERLOOK PL.
ERIN
LN.
G
.
L
E
A
F
W.
SKATER
CIR.
D
U
C
K
W
O
O
DT
R
.
B LUESTONE DR.E.
CLOVER
LN.
W
EXFORD
WAY
AQUARIUS LN.
L A K E V I E W
CUR.
ASHBURY
ROAD
DARTMOUTH
CT.
P
U
M
I
C
E
LN.
THAMESCIR.
RIVTN.CIR.
SUN
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
.
PONDEROSACIR.
M c C A R T H Y
R D .
GRANITE
CT.
AS
H
BURY
PL.
CAYLIN
CT.
SKY
LINE
PATH
OXFORD
RD.PENNSYLVANIA
AVALON AVE.
PINE
LANE
ISABELLE
CT.
VILD
MARKDR.
OAKB R K C T.
A M B E R LEAF
TR.
ALDER
LN.
S T P L C H A S E
C T.
CHES
MAR
DR.
DAKOTA
P AT H
SADDLE
WOOD
DRIVE
GREAT
OAKS
TR.
JURDY
R
OAD
L.POLE CT.
COPPER
LN.
WALNUT RDG DR.
TIF
F
A
N
Y
C
T.
FORGE
PL
LONE
OAK
CIR.
B
I
G
T
I
M
B
E
R
TR.
K I N G S W O O D
SUNCRST
CT.
DR.
P.RIDGE
CT.
JOYCE
CT.
MILLRUN
CT.
GREENSBORO
D
RIVE
GEMINI RD.
ESTATES
DR.
ROYALE
TRAIL
RICHARD'S
CT.
N.
R U B Y CT.O A K B R K
C I R .
WILDERNESS
LN.
TILBURY
WAY
BLKHRIDGEPL.
P L A Z A
DR.
WIDGEON
WAY
NORWEST
CT.
B O S T O N
CIR.
B
L
U
E
W
A
T
E
R
R
D.
WAVENEYCT.
TOFTE
LN.
BAYLORCT.
JADE
LN.
GENEVA
LN.
FOXRIDGE
CT.
RAINIER
LN.
ASHBURY
CT.
TERRA GLENN
CT.
DENMARK
A V E.
GOVERN
CIR.
S H E F.
C I R .
SUMMER
PL.
LEMIEUX CIR.
GARNET
PT.
DUNROVIN
LANE
RASPBERRYLN.
RED CEDAR RD.
KENNETH ST.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
S
P
R
I
N
G
W
D
P
A
T
H
MALLARD
CIR.
DIAMOND
DR.
LA NTE R N
CT.
RIDGE
CLIFFE
DR.
PELLO CIR.
S.
T R E N T O N
T R A I L
N A R VIK
CT.
CONEFLOWER CT.
CT.
D O N A L D
C T.
GALAXIE
AVE.
TOWN
CENTRE DR.
MARIE CT.
C
I
N
N
A
B
A
R
DR.
S.
MALLARD TR.
CAMPTONCT.
AVE.
PIN OAK DR.
C.GLEN
CIR.
R
O
BIN
L
N.
LYNX
CT.
C E D A R G R O V E P K W Y
TURQ.
CIR.MONTICELLO
AVE.
BALSAM ST.
STIRRUP
ST.
( CO. RD. 30 )
L
E
N
O
R
E
LN.
M A N O R
DR.
NO.
HAWK
PL.
STPLCHASE
WAY
WHITE PINE WAY
BRIAR CREEK RD.B.RDG.
RD.
TIMBER
SHORE
LN.
B R D G
WINDCREST
AVE.
CAMBRIDGE
DR.
SANDSTONE
DR.
NYBRO
CIR.
DEERWOOD
PL.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
COURTHOUSE
LN.
S K Y V I E W
C T .
CANVASBACK
LN.
B L K H W K
R I D G E
W A Y
(CO.RD.26 )
VIKINGS PKWY
GALWAY
LN.
BRISTOL
B L V D .
SKYLINE DR.
B.RDG.
RD.
W O R .
C I R .
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
AVON
CT.
WESCOTT RD.
R
O
Y
A
L
E
C T.
STPLC
H
A
S
E
L
N.
M I C H E L L E DR.
B R I D L E R D G .
RD.
BROWN BEAR TR.
WILD ERNESS
CU RV E
SHERWOOD
WAY
CANTEBURY
CIR.
HANOVERCT.
TRAIL
CT.
VIL A S
LN.
ACORN
ST.
LODGEPOLE
DR.
G R A NIT E
D R.
CARNELIAN LN.
W A L N U T LANE
CLEMSON
CIR.
HAW T H O R N E
W
O
O
D
S
DR.
CAM BER W E L L
AMES
C R O S SIN G R D.
CINNABAR
CT.
BEAVER
D A M
RD.
SAWGRASS
TRL
S.
V
E
N
T
N
O
R AVE.
W
I
L
D
E
R
NESS RUN D R .
LOUIS
LN.
CT.
LIN DEN
LN.
S.HAY LAKE
R D .
KINGLET
CT.
J
U
R
D
Y
C
T.
N
O
.
S
O
.
RITA CT.
J.C.R.L N.
SHELERUD
DR.
JOHNNY
CAKE
RDG
RD.
CRIMSON LEAF TR.
FEDERAL
DR.
W.BURY
LN.
CHES
MAR
CIR.
BLKHWK
RIDGE CT.
WOODLAND
CT.
VIK I N G S
PK W Y
SEVERN
WAY
FROMME
CT.
TANGLEWOOD CT.
SENJA
CT.
CRO
O
KED
STICK
CT.
O A K B R K
CUR.
NORTHWOOD PKWY.
FARM RD.
HALDEN
CIR.
PARKRIDGE D R .
P
O
N
D
S
RD.
NORTHVIEW
ST.
CHAS
PL.
EGAN
A
V
E
.
EAGLE
CREST
DR.
ZIRCON LN.
S P R U C E
C I R .
ROLL
LN.
BRIDGEWATER
DR.
BRADDOCK
TRAIL
CLIFFVIEW DR.
CLARK
CT.
T
.
H
.
7
7
SPOONBILL
CIR.
EMERALD
LN.
GRANDOAKCIR.W.
ALICIA
C
I
R
.
HILL RD.
F A L C O N
W A Y
SHEFFIELD
LN.
STONE
C
L
I
F
F
E
D
R
.
AL
B
A
N
Y
CIR.
WESCOTT ROAD
SUMMER LN.
GARNET
LN.
COLUMBIA
DR.
CLUBVIEW DR.
PR AIRIE
MALLARD
CT.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
( CO. RD. 26 )
THAMES
A V E.
AMBER
CT.
PATR I C K
R O A D
GABBRO TR.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SHIELDS
DR.
BLUE
STONE
LN.
RUSTEN
RD.
MALLARD D R.
L
N
.
SAFARI
P A S S
C O V I N G T O N
LN.
P E N K W E
C I R .
O S T E R
D R
B B .C T.
E.BALSAM T R A IL
C O R N W A LLIS
C T.
RIDGE
M O N A R CH TRL
WILDFLOWER CT.
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
VIE
W
DRIVE
B A L D
L A K E
C T.
WOODLARK
LN.
B.RDG.
CIR.
RIDGEWOOD
D
R.
CALVIN
CT.
SIG N A LP T .BRADDOCK
TR.
DIAMOND
PT.
R E B E C C A
L N .
JAMES
ST.
COUNTRY
CREEK
WAY
WHITE
PINE WAY
MARICE
DR.
KETTLE
C
R
E
E
K
R
D.
M O U R N I N G
D O V E C T .
BEACONHILL
CT.
BR.
R
D
G
.
ROAD
B
R
O
C
K
T
O
N
C
I
R
.
ROLLING
HILLS CT.
ONYX
D R .
SANDSTONE
DR.
S
O
U
TH
DEERWOODCT.
BERRY
DONEGAL
CT.
STRATFORD
L N .
CAPRICORN
CT.
PINECREST
CT.
PERIDOT
P A T H
ARLENE
CT.
S I G F R I D ST.
DISC OVE RY RD
STATION TR
WEST
SERVICE
ROAD
DEER POND
CIR.
S U N R I S E
C T.
BIRCHPOND
RD.
INLAND
RD
LONE
O
AK
D
RIVE
A U G U S TA
CT.
SIBLEY
CT.
BEECHER DR.
C
A
R
L
S
O
N
LAKE
LN.
N
.
HAWKSBURY
CIR.
FEDERAL
CT.
E
A
G
A
N
D
A
L
E
C ALCITE
DR.
N O R T H V I E W
P A R K R D.
HIGH VIEW AVE.
METCALF DR.
R
V
V
L
Y
W
A
Y
BLAC K HAWK
R
D
.
HAMILTON
( CO. RD. 31 )
DOLORES
LN.
R
I
D
G
E
V
I
E
W
D
R
.
WESTBURY
WAY
KATHRYN CIR.
DEERRIDGECT.
DODD
ROAD
O'NEILL DR.
DREXEL
CT.
ROCKY LN.
DRESDEN
WAY
SHADOW
C R K CUR.
GREEN
L
E
A
F
DR.
E.
SEQUOIA
DR.
W IL L B R O O K
C T.
QUARRY
LN.
CORPORATE CENTER
D
R
.
B I R C H CREST
CIR.
OLD
SIBLEY M E M.H W Y.
COACHMAN
ROAD
CHAPEL
LN.
TRUNK
HWY
13
CINNABARDR.
W
ESC
OTT
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
.
D
E
E
R
H
I
L
L
S
T R .
RD.
BALTIC
AVE.
HUMMINGBIRDLN.
B R A N T CIR.
BENT
TREE LN.
E
T
H
A
N
DR.
DR.
CLIFF
D
R.
RAHNCLIFF
CT.
S
L
A
T
E
R
R D.
SUPERIOR
CT.
THOMAS
L
A
K
E
R
D.
S A W G R A S S
T R L W .
J.C.R.
W
A
Y
W EST
MINSTE R
CIR.
(CO.RD.43)
AZALEA
WAY
BETTY
LN.
SALLY
CIR.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SOUTH HILLS
DR.
R U STE N R D
OAK
CHASE
LN.
DURHAM CT.B A F FI N
B A Y S.
PE BBLE
BEACH
WAY
RED
P I N E LANE
LENORE
LN.
L
O
N
E
OAK
P
A
RK
WAY
NOR
TH
RIDGE
D R .
HUNTERS
OVLK.
ERIN DR.
DUCK WOOD DR.
CEDAR RIDGE
CIR.
O
A
K
B
R
K.
S
U
M
B
R
.
P
L
.
PARK
S
I
D
E
CIR.
HAZELTINE
LN.
MERSEY
PT.
A D V A N T A G E
L N .
HIDDEN
MEADOWTR.
W A L L
S T .
WALNUT L N .
K
I
R
K
W
O
O
D
D
R.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
O A K
POND
R
D
.
WILDERNESS RUN RD.
TOWERVIEW RD.
GREATOAKS
CIR.
T I F FA N Y DR.
TANANGER
CT.
DIAMOND
DR.
E A G A N
O U T L E T S
P K W Y
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
WILD ROSE CT.
N.NYBRO
LN.
BR A DD OC K
TRAIL
CHIPMUNK CT.
N O R W O O D
D R .
V
E
R
M
O
N
T
A
V
E
.TERR.
DENMARK
AVE.
F
L
O
R
A
D
R
.
TRAPP ROAD
MARBLELN.
S A F A RI
C T.N.
COVINGTON LN.
CARLSON LAKE
LN.
BLUEBERRY
LN.
OAKS
CAST
LE T
O
N
CT.
AMES
CROSSING
RD.
B
I
R
C
H
P
O
N
D
R
D
.
GARDEN
TR.
W
E
D
G
WOOD
DR.
POPPLER
LANE
R E I N DEER
LN.
ALDEN
POND
LN.
SYCAMORE CT.
AUTUMN
COURT
BLACKHAWK
RD.
STONY POINTRD.
WESCOTT SQ.
JAMES S T .
KINGS RD.
COCHRANE
AVE.
W
A
Y H O R S E S H O E
C I R .
WALDEN
DR.
ARGENTA
TR.
W O R C H E ST E R
D R.
LYNX
C T .
G.M.
CT.
LAKE
PARKCIR.
BLUE C R O S S R O A D GOLFVIEW D R.
O
'
L
E
A
R
Y
L
N
.
KYLLO LN.
WESTON
HILLS
CT.
DANBURY
T R.
OPPERMAN DR.
SOUTHRIDGE
AVE.
ARIES
CT.
MAGNETITE
PT.
(CO.RD.30 )
B.
CIR.
W
O
O
D
G
A
T
E
P
T
.
SILVER
BELL
CIR.
J
A
S
P
E
R DR.
RIVERTON
AVE.
C H A T T E R T O N
C T .
CLOVER
LN.
HACKMORE
CT.
S.H.
WAY
WEXFORD
CIR.
G R E E N L E A F DR.
S.
E
R
I
N
DR.
ELRENE
CT.
HAMILTON D R.
CORAL LN.
JOURDAN
C T.
BEAR PATH TR.
SU N S E T
DR .
B L A C K H A W K
HILLS RD.
MAPLE TRAIL
CT.
C
O
C
H
.
AVE.
B R OO K LY N
CT.
CORPORATE
CENTER CURVE
W.BURY
T R.
SPRUCE ST.
KIRKWD
CIR.
COPPER
PT.
BLA
C
K
HA
W
K
R
D.GREATOAKS
PL.
RUSTIC
HILLS DR.
WILDFL.
LN.
WESTBURY
DR.
LEGENDS CT.
BADGER
CT.
QUARRY
CT.
O A K B R K TR.
TRENTON
ROAD
WOOD CLIFF
CT.
BIRCHPOND
PL.
R O Y ALE
W AY
ANDREW
ST.
RANDOM
RD.
GADWALL
CT.
CARNELIAN
LN.
SOUTH
H.CT.
SCOTT
T
R.
WATERS
ROAD
TIFFANY
PT.HAYLAKE
CT.
DIFFLEY RD.
GOLD
PT.
MARSH
CT.
NOKIA
WAY
BRAUN
CT.
SUNWOOD
TR.
PRINCETON
TR.
OVER
LOOK
C T .
WENZEL
AVE.
JACOB
CT.
STORLAND RD.
O A K C H A S E
C I R .
CROSS R
D.
SAWGRASS
TRL E.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
A U B U R N
C T .
B E A VERDAM
R
D
.
OAKBRK
D R .
KNOTTINGHAM
CIR.
PARKCLIFF
D
R.
BLUE GENTIAN RD.
HOPE DR
ESK LN.
LAKEVIEW
CURVE
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
D
R
.
MERGANSER
CT.
MED
ARY
AVE.
120th ST.
BOSTON
CT.
BLUEJAY
CT.
WESCOTT
WOODLANDS
P A R K K N O L L
D R.
CLEMSON
DR.
BAFFIN BAY
N
I
C
O
L
S
R
D
.
S
A
FA
R
IC
I
R
.
N.
MALMO
LN.
TOWERVIEW RD.
SAPPHIRE
LN.
S
T
R
A
W
BERRY LN.
D O N EGAL
WOODS CT.
DRAKE
DR.
L
I
V
I
N
G
S
T
ON
DR
CARNELIAN LN.
HAVEN
WDS. CT.
OAK
C
H
A
S
E
WAY
TRUNK
HWY
3
SUDBERRY
LANE
PROMONTORYPL.
WOLFBERRY
CT.
SIBLEY
HILLS
DR.
L
A
N
T
E
R
N
L
N.
F L I C K E R
C I R
SPRING
WOOD
CT.
BEATRICE ST.
N.
S T O N E B R .
N
A
R
VIK
D
R.
WIND
TR.
TIMBER W
OLF
TR.
WESCOTT
CIR.
WHITE
OAK
CT.
COUNTRYSIDE
DVNPT.
CIR.
MALLARD
VIEW
AVE.
YANKEE PL.
R
O
S
E
M
A
R
Y
C
T
.
CHATTERTON
TRVLRS
TR.
HOLIDAY LN.
T U R Q.P T .
B
U
R
R
OAK
S
T
.
MALMO
CIR.
E.BALSAM
ST.
WINDCREST CT.
WELLINGTON
WAY
SWEETST.
PLACE
C
.
G
L
E
N
L
N
.
DANBURYCT.
W N D T R
CI R .
LAKE
P
A
R
K
DR.
W
OODGATELN.W O O D G A T E
C T .
D U C K W O O D TR.
L O D E STONECIR.
RM NGTN CT.
COVINGTON LN.
ANDROMEDA
WAY
LEO
CT.
AUGUSTA
LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
W
H
I
T
E
T
A
I
L
W
A
Y
A
M
B
E
R
D
R.
MEADOW VIEW RD.
SKYLINE
DR.
DENMARK
TR.E.
EASTER
L N .
S
T
O
N
E
CLIFFE
DR.
APENINE
WAY
TYNE LN.
B.RDG.
RD.
PINETREE PASS
DIFFLEY ROAD
EDEN
CIR.
HEMLOCK
CIR.
JESSICA
CT.
K E N N E B E C
DR.
CINNAMON
R I D G E
TR.
L E X I N G TO N
R I D G E
EAGAN
WOODS
DR.
D U N BERRY
LN.
HILLSIDE
CT.
ST
N
W
D.C
T.
C.L E A F
C T.
LIN
D
E
N
C
T.
EAGLE
PT.DR.PINECONE
TR.
B
E
A
V
E
R
D
A
M
CT.
CARDINAL W A Y
COACHMAN
RD.
MARICE
CT.
DENMARKAVE.
JUSTICE
WAY
HYL
A
N
DC
T.
HACKMORE DR.
JOHNNYCAKE
RIDGECT.
GREYSTONE
RIDGE
W
ATER VIEWCOVE
WEDGWOOD LN.NORTH
W.BURYCIR.
IV
Y LANE
PADDOCK
CT.
OVERHILL RD.
BURGUNDY
DR.
APOLLO ROAD
DEERWOOD DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C I R .
MERSEY
WAY
JAMIE
ROSECT.
L A K E S I D E
DR.
HEINE
CT.
BARROW
CT.
PUMICE
LN.
RED
P
O
L
L
C
T.
B
A
M
B
L
ECIR.
WOODLAND TR.
CLIPPERS
RD.
NORTHVIEW
TERR.
NORTHVIEW PARK RD.
KOLSTAD
LN.
BISCAYNE
AV
E
.
ESK L N .
SILVER
BELL
R
O
A
D
BLACKHAWKLAKEPL.
FAIRWAY
HILLS
DR.
EASTWOOD
CT.
FLINTLN.
BERYL
R O A D
MILL
RUN
LN.
MIKE
COLLINS
DR.
O
A
K
B
R
K
L
N.
E L LI E
C T.
CURRY
TR.
K N O L L W D
C T.
CLIFFVIEW
DR.
K.W.
CT.
KITTIWAKE
CIR.
CHESTNUT
P A R K V I E W LN.
GLORY DR.
OPAL DR.
S B R K .
C I R .
CYPRESS
PT.INTERLACHEN D R
H
E
A
T
H
E
R
D R .
STONE
BR. CIR.
THOMAS LN.
TYNECT.
DIFFLEY ROAD
KIN G S T O N
C T.
C
H
A
T
H
A
M
R
D
.
KOLSTAD
RD.
WARRICK
CT.
COSMOS LN.
QUARRY
RD.
HIGHVW
TERR.
( CO. RD. 32 )
N.MALLARD
TR.
TIF F A N Y
CIR.N.
HURON
CT.
GOLD
CT.
S
A
F
A
R
I
T
R
.
BEACON
HILL
CIR.
W A S H I N G T O N
D R I V E
HACKMORE
D
R
.
DUNROVINPL.
EA
G
A
N
IN
D
USTRIAL
R
O
AD
MILL RUN
PATH
F O R S S A
W AY
THMS.
AVE.
FOUR
SEASONS DR.
W
E
S
T
AMETH
Y
S
T
L
N
.
HICKORY
H I L L
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
77thST.W.
PALISADE
CIR.
ERIK'S
BLVD.
KIN G S B U R Y
D R.
CRESTRIDGE CT.
W
I
D
GEON
WAY
HERITAGE
LN.
COUNTRY
CT.
PALIS.
WATERFORDDR.E.
SARTELL AVE.
A P PA L OO S A T R .
WITHAM
LN.
DEERCLIFFCT.
YANKEE
D
O
O
DLE
RD.
B. WAY
SHEVLIN
CT.
DEN M AR K
AVE.
R I D G E
R D .
DIFFLEY ROAD
F
A
I
R
L
A
W
N
P
L.
TODD
AVE.
WESTON
HILLS
PL.
ELRENE R D .
B
.
R
D
G
.
R
D
.
JAMES CT.
W H I T E T A IL WAY
SHALE LANE
N
.
S
V
E
N
S
K
L
N
.
ROLLING
HILLS
CIR.
W
O
O
D
D
U
C
K
C
I
R
.
W
I
L
D
P
.
C
T
.
LASSO
LN.
TAC.TR.
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
G
G
H
H
I
I
J
J
K
K
L
L
12 12
11 11
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
TransportationTrails NOT Currently Included in theWinter Trail Maintenance Program
Transportation Trails/Sidewalks NOT Plowed = 45.12 miles
L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\Streets\Plowing\Trails\NewTrailPlowingConsiderations\23-24\TransportationTrails_NotPlowed_MapB.mxd
Date Saved: 5/4/2023
0 ½1 Miles
Map B
B A L D
E A G L E
C T .
MATTHEW CT.
HALITE
LN.
P
U
M
I
C
E
C
T
.
BLKHWK.
L A K E DR.
SUNRISE
R O AD
YORKT OWN DR.
L
E
XI
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
.
BEAM
LN.
ORION
LN.
RED PINE LN.
WALFRID
ST.
SYCAMORE
DR.
DRESDEN
CT.
RD.
P
A
L
O
MIN
O
T
R.
McFADDENS
T R .
QUAIL
CREEK
CIR.
CANARY
WAY
PINE
CONE
CIR.
OAKBROOKE
WAY
J O H N N Y
CAKE
R D G
RD
THOMAS
LN.
C H E S M A R
L N .
A
R
G
E
N
T
A
T
R
AIL
BRENTWOOD LN.
CHAPEL
CT.
WESTCHESTER
CIR.
NEW
YORK
AVE.
O L D S I B L E Y
H W Y .
W O O DLA N D
TR.
LONE OAK ROAD
MALMO
PL.
R.CT.
QUARTZ LN.
BLUE JAY
WAY
CENTURY
PT.
CLEMSON
CT.
YORKTOWN PLACE
H A C K MORE
DR.
M I C A
T R A I L
L O N D O N
L N .
81st
ST.
KENNET
CIR.
S.H.
CIR.
FLINT
DR.
120th ST.W.
CLIFF RD.
KEEFE ST.
BLACKHAWK
PT.
TIFFANY
PL.
ERIE
CT.
RAHNCLIFF
RD.
KARIS
W A Y
LAKESIDE
CT.
SHERMAN
CT.
OAKBRK.
ALCOVE
CLINTON
TR.
O A K
C T .
OAK
CHASE
RD.
ALDRIN DR.
D
R
.N
C
HESHIR
E
CT.
BRIARWD
LN.
MARILYN
AVE.
INTERLACHEN
DR.
GRACE
DR.
FOX
RIDGE
RD.
PACIFIC
AVE.
BROOKVIEW
CT.
P.SIDE
CT.
PARK CENTER
DR.
COVENTRY
P K W Y .
B
.
R
I
D
G
E
C
I
R
.
GAB.CIR.
C A R I B O U
L N.
E
L
R
E
N
E
R
D
.
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
G
LA
CIE
RD
R.
AMARYLLIS
LN.
LEXINGTON
WAY
K
U
T
O
F
F
C
T
.
KNOLL
RIDGE
DR.
CROSS
ROAD
CT.
N
O
R
.C
T
.
WALNUT CT.
E .BALSAM
TR.
N .
R O G E R S
C T .
N I C O L S R O A D
HIGHCROFT
CT.
TRILLIUM CT.
THORWOOD CT.
R
D
G
.
RD.
EAGAN DALE
BLV D.
TOWN
CENTRE
DR .
SAFARI
CT.S.
WINDSOR
CT.
BROCKTON
CURVE
F O U R S E A S O N S C T.
PENKWE
WAY
L
I
M
O
N
I
T
E
FAWN
R
I
D
G
E
T
R
.
SIGFRID ST.
STEPHANIECIR.
SKYLINE RD
WESTON
DEERWOOD DR.
DEERCLIFF L N .
TR
OTTER
S
RIDGE
DONALD
AVE.
LONE OAK ROAD
WAY
KRESTWOOD
LN.
77th ST.W.
N
O
RTHB
R.
CT.
L A K E P A R K
C T .
RD.
STONE
VIENNA LANE P O ND-
VIE W
D R.
SER.
CIR.CRESTVIEWLN.
MURPHY
PARKWAY
D E E R W O O D
TRAIL
M ALLA R D
PL.
W O O D G A T E
L N .
LETENDRE ST.
FOUR OAKS RD.
WILDFL.
WAY
HAVENHILL
CIR.
LANCASTER
LN.
PIN
E
T
R
E
E
CUR.TAMIE
AVE.
ARGENTA
TR.
H I C K O R Y
H IL L
HOSFORD
HILLS
DR.
WILLOW
WAY
R O L L I N G
H I L L S P L .
C O U G A R
D R .
NESTLING
CIR.
LY R A
C T.
GUN
CLUB RD.
W.BURY
PATH
N E W T O W N
C T.
DEERWOOD DRIVE
VERSAILLES
CT.
SERPENTINE
DR.
B
.
R
D
G
.R
D
.
WELLINGTONCT.
S
T
A
T
E
S
W.R.CIR.
GOLDEN
M
E
A
D
O
W RD.
C A M B E R W
E
L
L
METCALF
DR.
MAJESTIC
OAKS
PL.
F A L C O N WAY
C
O
M
A
N
C
H
E
R
D.
JENNIFER
CT.
B L U E H E R O N
C T .
MAPLE
LEAF
CIR.
V.
CT.
C
O
M
M
E
R
S
DRIVE
SUNWOOD
CT.SOUTH
HILLS LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
STPLCHASE
CIR.
OAKLEAF
CIR.
ATLANTIC HILL
DR.
AIDAN CV.
BAYBERRY LN.
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
E
.
PINTAIL
CT.
WOODLAND
WAY
BEAR
PATH TR.
MACLAREN
PL.
S K Y W O O D
L N.
B L A C K H A W K
C O V E
WATERVIEW
TR.
NOKIA
W
A
Y
GREAT OAKSLN.
K I N G S
C R E S T
L N .GIBRALTAR
TR.
BROOKLYN L N.
CLIFFHILL
L
N.
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
CT.
A V A L O N
PAT H
N.HAY LAKE
RD.
GOLD
TR.
S A F A R I H
EIG
H
T
S
TR.
CAMELBACKDR.
LOON
LN.
S.R U B Y
C T.
PARK
PL.
BLACK
WOLF
RUN
TACONITE TR.
G.B
O
R
O
C
T.
NORTHWD
CIR.
JEFFERSON
LANE
BLUE
JAY WAY
C
L
I
F
F
RIDGE
CT.
CENTER
CT.
WREN
LN.
CLARK ST.
TOPAZ
DR.
ROYALE DR.
EGAN
LAKEVIEW
T
R.
W E X F O R D
C T.
ALICIA
DR.
Q
U
A
I
L
RDG
RD.
LN
BO
R
CHERT
LN.
GRAND
OAK
CIR.
N.
N.
ALEXANDER
RD.
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
P
R
A
I
R
IE
CIR.
W.
JOHNNY CAKEALCOVE
S.
HAY
L
K
CLIFF ROAD
KIN
G
S
W
O
O
D
R D .
CURRY
TR.
JADE LN.
DRWD
PATH
WOODGATE
PT.
O
N
Y
X
P
T
.
PRAIRIEDUNESWAY
S.
CT.
GARNET
DR.
SURREY
H E I G H T S DR.
HAV EN H I L L
R D .
RIVERTON AVE.
DR.
McKEE ST.
ESK
CIR.
S
E
N
E
C
A
R
D.
AMBER
DR.
EASTER LN.
YANKEE DR.
S K Y L I N E
C T .
STORLAND
CT.
WHISP.
CT.
W
IN
D
TR.
B B .K N O L L
N
O
R.
CIR.
H I C K O R Y
H I L L
JADE PT.
PINE
RIDGE
DR.
DR.
N.B
.
W
A
T
E
RD
R
.
O
A
K
CLIFF
D R .
LEXINGTON
POINTE P A R K W A Y
LEONARD
LN.
NORTHWOOD
PKWY.
P E N K W E WAY
TIM BER
W
O
LFT
R.
AUTUMNCIR.
CLE
M
SO
N DR.
KNOB
DR.
THOMAS
CENTER D R .
W N D T R .
K N O L L
RED
OAK
D R.
BEACON
HILL
R D.
ALLAN
LN.
ENGLERT ROAD
WINDTREE DR.
( CO. RD. 31 )
C
A
N
T
E
R
G
L
E
N
D
R
.
O
A
K
P
O
N
D
C
I
R
.
HIGHVIEW AVE.
BRDGVW
AVE.
DAVENPORT
AV.
PRINCETON
CIR.
D E N M A R K
C T .W .
MOONSTONE
DR.
ST.E.
OAK
WAY
BERKSHIRE DR.
KAUFMANIS
WAY
HARBOURPT.
(CO.RD.32 )CLIFF ROAD
WALNUT
LA
N
E
PROMENADE
AVE.
RD.
L O D E STONE
LN.
SUMMIT
PASS
E A G A N D A L E
C T.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
CRESTRIDGE LN.
W.R.CT.
S H O R T
LIN E
S
HA
W
NEE
R
D.
BURNSIDE
A V E .
IVY CT.
HUNT DR.
HEINE
STRASSE
B R A D F O R D
P L .
PILOT
KNOB
RD.
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
CLIFFROAD
BASSWOOD
LN.
WNDTR
CT.
LUNAR
LN.
CIVIC C E NTE R
DR.
WEDGWOOD LN.
SOUTH
VALLEY
DIAMOND
D
R
.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
RICHARD
LN.
S T O N E W O O D R D .
HILLSIDE
DRIVE
MEADOWLARKRD.
S TA N W IX R D.
L
A
K
E
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
.
DUN.
CIR.
SEAN CT.
ROSA
CT.
VIOLET
LANE
D O L O M IT E
D R .
BISCAYNE
AVE.
GREENLEAF DR.N.
WESTBURY
KNOLL
S
A
W
G
R
A
S
S
T
R
L
W
.
SILVER BELL RD.
TWINS
CT.
P
T
E
.
W
A
Y
F O X M O O R E
C T.
DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C T .
BOA RD WALK
CHERRYWOOD
CT.
TR.
McFA
DDEN
S
TR.
AVALON
CT.
D
O
R
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
C
T
.
PUMICE
PT.
G .B O R O
L N.
S L A T E R
RD.
RAHN
WAY
DENMARK
CT.E.
WDCRST
CIR.
TICONDEROGA TR.
CUTTERS LN.
RED
P
I
N
E
CT.
H
O
RIZON
CIR.
LONE OAK ROAD
ARBOR
CT.
E A S T
P O N D R D .
WHISPERING
WAY R O Y A L E
P L .
ST.
ANDREW
BLVD
G L E N F I E L D
C T .
P I N E T R E E
TRAIL
BEVERLY
D
R.
ALISON
W
AY
MILL RUN
CIR.
NEIL
ARMSTRONG
BLVD.
T U R Q U O I S E
T R .
NICOLS
ROAD
DUCK
WOOD
D
R.
OPAL
PL.
T E R R A C E
SUMBR. CT.
DODD
ROAD
HAUGE
CIR.
K I N G S W O O D
L N .
DANIEL
DRIVE
CASHELL
G
L
E
N
MAHOGANY
WAY
WINGED
FOOTTR
HICKORY
LN.
DR .
LAUREL
CT.
MICHIGANCT.
DENMARK
AVE.
FIRST
ST.
TYNE LN.
HILLTOP
LN.
T I F F A N Y
C I R .S .
CLEOME LN.
CENTRAL
PKWY.
DR.
WHISP.
TR.
N
O
RTHVIE
W DR.
TROTTERS
CT.
KE N N E B E C
D RIVE
LIMESTONE
DR.
PENN SYL
V
A
N
I
A
AVE.
CLIFF
LAKE
ROAD
WILDERNESS
PARKCIR.
BB.CIR.
OLI
V
I
N
E D
R
.
SHER.
CT.
T
A
M
P
E
R
E
C
I
R.
LN.
WATERFOR
D
DR.
W.
TIM BE R
W O LF
CT.
SHALE LN.
SVENSK
LN.
WLNT
CIR.
WDTHRSH
CT.
PRAIRIE
CIR.E.
WIND MILL
CT.
WELLANDCT.
B. CT.
P
A
LIS
A
D
E
P
T.
CRESTRIDGE
DR.
F A R N U M DR.
TRAMORE
PL.
SHERWOOD WAY
THOMAS
LAKE
R
O
A
D
M A J E S T I C
O A K S C T .
HIG H SITE DR.
REDOAKCT.
BHWK.
CIR.
SLATERCT.
VIBURNUM TR.
RED FOX
R
D
.
MONTEREY LN.
CORP.
CENT.
DR.
HILLS
DR.
SAVANNAH
R
D.
F AIR H A V E N
R D.
BRIDGEVIEW
TERR.
D E N M A R K
T R .W .
(CO.RD.28 )
EAGANDALE
BLVD.
TEAL
COVE
N.H A Y
L A K E
R D .
KIRSTEN
CT.
BLAC
K
OAK
DR.
TAC.
PT.
NANCY
CIR.
KIRKWD
DR.
OVERLOOK PL.
ERIN
LN.
G
.
L
E
A
F
W.
SKATER
CIR.
D
U
C
K
W
O
O
DT
R
.
B LUESTONE DR.E.
CLOVER
LN.
W
EXFORD
WAY
AQUARIUS LN.
L A K E V I E W
CUR.
ASHBURY
ROAD
DARTMOUTH
CT.
P
U
M
I
C
E
LN.
THAMESCIR.
RIVTN.CIR.
SUN
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
.
PONDEROSACIR.
M c C A R T H Y
R D .
GRANITE
CT.
AS
H
BURY
PL.
CAYLIN
CT.
SKY
LINE
PATH
OXFORD
RD.PENNSYLVANIA
AVALON AVE.
PINE
LANE
ISABELLE
CT.
VILD
MARKDR.
OAKB R K C T.
A M B E R LEAF
TR.
ALDER
LN.
S T P L C H A S E
C T.
CHES
MAR
DR.
DAKOTA
P AT H
SADDLE
WOOD
DRIVE
GREAT
OAKS
TR.
JURDY
R
OAD
L.POLE CT.
COPPER
LN.
WALNUT RDG DR.
TIF
F
A
N
Y
C
T.
FORGE
PL
LONE
OAK
CIR.
B
I
G
T
I
M
B
E
R
TR.
K I N G S W O O D
SUNCRST
CT.
DR.
P.RIDGE
CT.
JOYCE
CT.
MILLRUN
CT.
GREENSBORO
D
RIVE
GEMINI RD.
ESTATES
DR.
ROYALE
TRAIL
RICHARD'S
CT.
N.
R U B Y CT.O A K B R K
C I R .
WILDERNESS
LN.
TILBURY
WAY
BLKHRIDGEPL.
P L A Z A
DR.
WIDGEON
WAY
NORWEST
CT.
B O S T O N
CIR.
B
L
U
E
W
A
T
E
R
R
D.
WAVENEYCT.
TOFTE
LN.
BAYLORCT.
JADE
LN.
GENEVA
LN.
FOXRIDGE
CT.
RAINIER
LN.
ASHBURY
CT.
TERRA GLENN
CT.
DENMARK
A V E.
GOVERN
CIR.
S H E F.
C I R .
SUMMER
PL.
LEMIEUX CIR.
GARNET
PT.
DUNROVIN
LANE
RASPBERRYLN.
RED CEDAR RD.
KENNETH ST.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
S
P
R
I
N
G
W
D
P
A
T
H
MALLARD
CIR.
DIAMOND
DR.
LA NTE R N
CT.
RIDGE
CLIFFE
DR.
PELLO CIR.
S.
T R E N T O N
T R A I L
N A R VIK
CT.
CONEFLOWER CT.
CT.
D O N A L D
C T.
GALAXIE
AVE.
TOWN
CENTRE DR.
MARIE CT.
C
I
N
N
A
B
A
R
DR.
S.
MALLARD TR.
CAMPTONCT.
AVE.
PIN OAK DR.
C.GLEN
CIR.
R
O
BIN
L
N.
LYNX
CT.
C E D A R G R O V E P K W Y
TURQ.
CIR.MONTICELLO
AVE.
BALSAM ST.
STIRRUP
ST.
( CO. RD. 30 )
L
E
N
O
R
E
LN.
M A N O R
DR.
NO.
HAWK
PL.
STPLCHASE
WAY
WHITE PINE WAY
BRIAR CREEK RD.B.RDG.
RD.
TIMBER
SHORE
LN.
B R D G
WINDCREST
AVE.
CAMBRIDGE
DR.
SANDSTONE
DR.
NYBRO
CIR.
DEERWOOD
PL.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
COURTHOUSE
LN.
S K Y V I E W
C T .
CANVASBACK
LN.
B L K H W K
R I D G E
W A Y
(CO.RD.26 )
VIKINGS PKWY
GALWAY
LN.
BRISTOL
B L V D .
SKYLINE DR.
B.RDG.
RD.
W O R .
C I R .
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
AVON
CT.
WESCOTT RD.
R
O
Y
A
L
E
C T.
STPLC
H
A
S
E
L
N.
M I C H E L L E DR.
B R I D L E R D G .
RD.
BROWN BEAR TR.
WILD ERNESS
CU RV E
SHERWOOD
WAY
CANTEBURY
CIR.
HANOVERCT.
TRAIL
CT.
VIL A S
LN.
ACORN
ST.
LODGEPOLE
DR.
G R A NIT E
D R.
CARNELIAN LN.
W A L N U T LANE
CLEMSON
CIR.
HAW T H O R N E
W
O
O
D
S
DR.
CAM BER W E L L
AMES
C R O S SIN G R D.
CINNABAR
CT.
BEAVER
D A M
RD.
SAWGRASS
TRL
S.
V
E
N
T
N
O
R AVE.
W
I
L
D
E
R
NESS RUN D R .
LOUIS
LN.
CT.
LIN DEN
LN.
S.HAY LAKE
R D .
KINGLET
CT.
J
U
R
D
Y
C
T.
N
O
.
S
O
.
RITA CT.
J.C.R.L N.
SHELERUD
DR.
JOHNNY
CAKE
RDG
RD.
CRIMSON LEAF TR.
FEDERAL
DR.
W.BURY
LN.
CHES
MAR
CIR.
BLKHWK
RIDGE CT.
WOODLAND
CT.
VIK I N G S
PK W Y
SEVERN
WAY
FROMME
CT.
TANGLEWOOD CT.
SENJA
CT.
CRO
O
KED
STICK
CT.
O A K B R K
CUR.
NORTHWOOD PKWY.
FARM RD.
HALDEN
CIR.
PARKRIDGE D R .
P
O
N
D
S
RD.
NORTHVIEW
ST.
CHAS
PL.
EGAN
A
V
E
.
EAGLE
CREST
DR.
ZIRCON LN.
S P R U C E
C I R .
ROLL
LN.
BRIDGEWATER
DR.
BRADDOCK
TRAIL
CLIFFVIEW DR.
CLARK
CT.
T
.
H
.
7
7
SPOONBILL
CIR.
EMERALD
LN.
GRANDOAKCIR.W.
ALICIA
C
I
R
.
HILL RD.
F A L C O N
W A Y
SHEFFIELD
LN.
STONE
C
L
I
F
F
E
D
R
.
AL
B
A
N
Y
CIR.
WESCOTT ROAD
SUMMER LN.
GARNET
LN.
COLUMBIA
DR.
CLUBVIEW DR.
PR AIRIE
MALLARD
CT.
PILOT
KNOB
ROAD
( CO. RD. 26 )
THAMES
A V E.
AMBER
CT.
PATR I C K
R O A D
GABBRO TR.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SHIELDS
DR.
BLUE
STONE
LN.
RUSTEN
RD.
MALLARD D R.
L
N
.
SAFARI
P A S S
C O V I N G T O N
LN.
P E N K W E
C I R .
O S T E R
D R
B B .C T.
E.BALSAM T R A IL
C O R N W A LLIS
C T.
RIDGE
M O N A R CH TRL
WILDFLOWER CT.
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
VIE
W
DRIVE
B A L D
L A K E
C T.
WOODLARK
LN.
B.RDG.
CIR.
RIDGEWOOD
D
R.
CALVIN
CT.
SIG N A LP T .BRADDOCK
TR.
DIAMOND
PT.
R E B E C C A
L N .
JAMES
ST.
COUNTRY
CREEK
WAY
WHITE
PINE WAY
MARICE
DR.
KETTLE
C
R
E
E
K
R
D.
M O U R N I N G
D O V E C T .
BEACONHILL
CT.
BR.
R
D
G
.
ROAD
B
R
O
C
K
T
O
N
C
I
R
.
ROLLING
HILLS CT.
ONYX
D R .
SANDSTONE
DR.
S
O
U
TH
DEERWOODCT.
BERRY
DONEGAL
CT.
STRATFORD
L N .
CAPRICORN
CT.
PINECREST
CT.
PERIDOT
P A T H
ARLENE
CT.
S I G F R I D ST.
DISC OVE RY RD
STATION TR
WEST
SERVICE
ROAD
DEER POND
CIR.
S U N R I S E
C T.
BIRCHPOND
RD.
INLAND
RD
LONE
O
AK
D
RIVE
A U G U S TA
CT.
SIBLEY
CT.
BEECHER DR.
C
A
R
L
S
O
N
LAKE
LN.
N
.
HAWKSBURY
CIR.
FEDERAL
CT.
E
A
G
A
N
D
A
L
E
C ALCITE
DR.
N O R T H V I E W
P A R K R D.
HIGH VIEW AVE.
METCALF DR.
R
V
V
L
Y
W
A
Y
BLAC K HAWK
R
D
.
HAMILTON
( CO. RD. 31 )
DOLORES
LN.
R
I
D
G
E
V
I
E
W
D
R
.
WESTBURY
WAY
KATHRYN CIR.
DEERRIDGECT.
DODD
ROAD
O'NEILL DR.
DREXEL
CT.
ROCKY LN.
DRESDEN
WAY
SHADOW
C R K CUR.
GREEN
L
E
A
F
DR.
E.
SEQUOIA
DR.
W IL L B R O O K
C T.
QUARRY
LN.
CORPORATE CENTER
D
R
.
B I R C H CREST
CIR.
OLD
SIBLEY M E M.H W Y.
COACHMAN
ROAD
CHAPEL
LN.
TRUNK
HWY
13
CINNABARDR.
W
ESC
OTT
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
.
D
E
E
R
H
I
L
L
S
T R .
RD.
BALTIC
AVE.
HUMMINGBIRDLN.
B R A N T CIR.
BENT
TREE LN.
E
T
H
A
N
DR.
DR.
CLIFF
D
R.
RAHNCLIFF
CT.
S
L
A
T
E
R
R D.
SUPERIOR
CT.
THOMAS
L
A
K
E
R
D.
S A W G R A S S
T R L W .
J.C.R.
W
A
Y
W EST
MINSTE R
CIR.
(CO.RD.43)
AZALEA
WAY
BETTY
LN.
SALLY
CIR.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
(
CO.
RD.
43
)
SOUTH HILLS
DR.
R U STE N R D
OAK
CHASE
LN.
DURHAM CT.B A F FI N
B A Y S.
PE BBLE
BEACH
WAY
RED
P I N E LANE
LENORE
LN.
L
O
N
E
OAK
P
A
RK
WAY
NOR
TH
RIDGE
D R .
HUNTERS
OVLK.
ERIN DR.
DUCK WOOD DR.
CEDAR RIDGE
CIR.
O
A
K
B
R
K.
S
U
M
B
R
.
P
L
.
PARK
S
I
D
E
CIR.
HAZELTINE
LN.
MERSEY
PT.
A D V A N T A G E
L N .
HIDDEN
MEADOWTR.
W A L L
S T .
WALNUT L N .
K
I
R
K
W
O
O
D
D
R.
ROLLING
HILLS
DR.
O A K
POND
R
D
.
WILDERNESS RUN RD.
TOWERVIEW RD.
GREATOAKS
CIR.
T I F FA N Y DR.
TANANGER
CT.
DIAMOND
DR.
E A G A N
O U T L E T S
P K W Y
HIGHRIDGE
TERR.
WILD ROSE CT.
N.NYBRO
LN.
BR A DD OC K
TRAIL
CHIPMUNK CT.
N O R W O O D
D R .
V
E
R
M
O
N
T
A
V
E
.TERR.
DENMARK
AVE.
F
L
O
R
A
D
R
.
TRAPP ROAD
MARBLELN.
S A F A RI
C T.N.
COVINGTON LN.
CARLSON LAKE
LN.
BLUEBERRY
LN.
OAKS
CAST
LE T
O
N
CT.
AMES
CROSSING
RD.
B
I
R
C
H
P
O
N
D
R
D
.
GARDEN
TR.
W
E
D
G
WOOD
DR.
POPPLER
LANE
R E I N DEER
LN.
ALDEN
POND
LN.
SYCAMORE CT.
AUTUMN
COURT
BLACKHAWK
RD.
STONY POINTRD.
WESCOTT SQ.
JAMES S T .
KINGS RD.
COCHRANE
AVE.
W
A
Y H O R S E S H O E
C I R .
WALDEN
DR.
ARGENTA
TR.
W O R C H E ST E R
D R.
LYNX
C T .
G.M.
CT.
LAKE
PARKCIR.
BLUE C R O S S R O A D GOLFVIEW D R.
O
'
L
E
A
R
Y
L
N
.
KYLLO LN.
WESTON
HILLS
CT.
DANBURY
T R.
OPPERMAN DR.
SOUTHRIDGE
AVE.
ARIES
CT.
MAGNETITE
PT.
(CO.RD.30 )
B.
CIR.
W
O
O
D
G
A
T
E
P
T
.
SILVER
BELL
CIR.
J
A
S
P
E
R DR.
RIVERTON
AVE.
C H A T T E R T O N
C T .
CLOVER
LN.
HACKMORE
CT.
S.H.
WAY
WEXFORD
CIR.
G R E E N L E A F DR.
S.
E
R
I
N
DR.
ELRENE
CT.
HAMILTON D R.
CORAL LN.
JOURDAN
C T.
BEAR PATH TR.
SU N S E T
DR .
B L A C K H A W K
HILLS RD.
MAPLE TRAIL
CT.
C
O
C
H
.
AVE.
B R OO K LY N
CT.
CORPORATE
CENTER CURVE
W.BURY
T R.
SPRUCE ST.
KIRKWD
CIR.
COPPER
PT.
BLA
C
K
HA
W
K
R
D.GREATOAKS
PL.
RUSTIC
HILLS DR.
WILDFL.
LN.
WESTBURY
DR.
LEGENDS CT.
BADGER
CT.
QUARRY
CT.
O A K B R K TR.
TRENTON
ROAD
WOOD CLIFF
CT.
BIRCHPOND
PL.
R O Y ALE
W AY
ANDREW
ST.
RANDOM
RD.
GADWALL
CT.
CARNELIAN
LN.
SOUTH
H.CT.
SCOTT
T
R.
WATERS
ROAD
TIFFANY
PT.HAYLAKE
CT.
DIFFLEY RD.
GOLD
PT.
MARSH
CT.
NOKIA
WAY
BRAUN
CT.
SUNWOOD
TR.
PRINCETON
TR.
OVER
LOOK
C T .
WENZEL
AVE.
JACOB
CT.
STORLAND RD.
O A K C H A S E
C I R .
CROSS R
D.
SAWGRASS
TRL E.
LEXINGTON
AVE.
A U B U R N
C T .
B E A VERDAM
R
D
.
OAKBRK
D R .
KNOTTINGHAM
CIR.
PARKCLIFF
D
R.
BLUE GENTIAN RD.
HOPE DR
ESK LN.
LAKEVIEW
CURVE
BLACKHAWK
LAKE
D
R
.
MERGANSER
CT.
MED
ARY
AVE.
120th ST.
BOSTON
CT.
BLUEJAY
CT.
WESCOTT
WOODLANDS
P A R K K N O L L
D R.
CLEMSON
DR.
BAFFIN BAY
N
I
C
O
L
S
R
D
.
S
A
FA
R
IC
I
R
.
N.
MALMO
LN.
TOWERVIEW RD.
SAPPHIRE
LN.
S
T
R
A
W
BERRY LN.
D O N EGAL
WOODS CT.
DRAKE
DR.
L
I
V
I
N
G
S
T
ON
DR
CARNELIAN LN.
HAVEN
WDS. CT.
OAK
C
H
A
S
E
WAY
TRUNK
HWY
3
SUDBERRY
LANE
PROMONTORYPL.
WOLFBERRY
CT.
SIBLEY
HILLS
DR.
L
A
N
T
E
R
N
L
N.
F L I C K E R
C I R
SPRING
WOOD
CT.
BEATRICE ST.
N.
S T O N E B R .
N
A
R
VIK
D
R.
WIND
TR.
TIMBER W
OLF
TR.
WESCOTT
CIR.
WHITE
OAK
CT.
COUNTRYSIDE
DVNPT.
CIR.
MALLARD
VIEW
AVE.
YANKEE PL.
R
O
S
E
M
A
R
Y
C
T
.
CHATTERTON
TRVLRS
TR.
HOLIDAY LN.
T U R Q.P T .
B
U
R
R
OAK
S
T
.
MALMO
CIR.
E.BALSAM
ST.
WINDCREST CT.
WELLINGTON
WAY
SWEETST.
PLACE
C
.
G
L
E
N
L
N
.
DANBURYCT.
W N D T R
CI R .
LAKE
P
A
R
K
DR.
W
OODGATELN.W O O D G A T E
C T .
D U C K W O O D TR.
L O D E STONECIR.
RM NGTN CT.
COVINGTON LN.
ANDROMEDA
WAY
LEO
CT.
AUGUSTA
LN.
NICOLS
ROAD
W
H
I
T
E
T
A
I
L
W
A
Y
A
M
B
E
R
D
R.
MEADOW VIEW RD.
SKYLINE
DR.
DENMARK
TR.E.
EASTER
L N .
S
T
O
N
E
CLIFFE
DR.
APENINE
WAY
TYNE LN.
B.RDG.
RD.
PINETREE PASS
DIFFLEY ROAD
EDEN
CIR.
HEMLOCK
CIR.
JESSICA
CT.
K E N N E B E C
DR.
CINNAMON
R I D G E
TR.
L E X I N G TO N
R I D G E
EAGAN
WOODS
DR.
D U N BERRY
LN.
HILLSIDE
CT.
ST
N
W
D.C
T.
C.L E A F
C T.
LIN
D
E
N
C
T.
EAGLE
PT.DR.PINECONE
TR.
B
E
A
V
E
R
D
A
M
CT.
CARDINAL W A Y
COACHMAN
RD.
MARICE
CT.
DENMARKAVE.
JUSTICE
WAY
HYL
A
N
DC
T.
HACKMORE DR.
JOHNNYCAKE
RIDGECT.
GREYSTONE
RIDGE
W
ATER VIEWCOVE
WEDGWOOD LN.NORTH
W.BURYCIR.
IV
Y LANE
PADDOCK
CT.
OVERHILL RD.
BURGUNDY
DR.
APOLLO ROAD
DEERWOOD DRIVE
C V I N G T N .
C I R .
MERSEY
WAY
JAMIE
ROSECT.
L A K E S I D E
DR.
HEINE
CT.
BARROW
CT.
PUMICE
LN.
RED
P
O
L
L
C
T.
B
A
M
B
L
ECIR.
WOODLAND TR.
CLIPPERS
RD.
NORTHVIEW
TERR.
NORTHVIEW PARK RD.
KOLSTAD
LN.
BISCAYNE
AV
E
.
ESK L N .
SILVER
BELL
R
O
A
D
BLACKHAWKLAKEPL.
FAIRWAY
HILLS
DR.
EASTWOOD
CT.
FLINTLN.
BERYL
R O A D
MILL
RUN
LN.
MIKE
COLLINS
DR.
O
A
K
B
R
K
L
N.
E L LI E
C T.
CURRY
TR.
K N O L L W D
C T.
CLIFFVIEW
DR.
K.W.
CT.
KITTIWAKE
CIR.
CHESTNUT
P A R K V I E W LN.
GLORY DR.
OPAL DR.
S B R K .
C I R .
CYPRESS
PT.INTERLACHEN D R
H
E
A
T
H
E
R
D R .
STONE
BR. CIR.
THOMAS LN.
TYNECT.
DIFFLEY ROAD
KIN G S T O N
C T.
C
H
A
T
H
A
M
R
D
.
KOLSTAD
RD.
WARRICK
CT.
COSMOS LN.
QUARRY
RD.
HIGHVW
TERR.
( CO. RD. 32 )
N.MALLARD
TR.
TIF F A N Y
CIR.N.
HURON
CT.
GOLD
CT.
S
A
F
A
R
I
T
R
.
BEACON
HILL
CIR.
W A S H I N G T O N
D R I V E
HACKMORE
D
R
.
DUNROVINPL.
EA
G
A
N
IN
D
USTRIAL
R
O
AD
MILL RUN
PATH
F O R S S A
W AY
THMS.
AVE.
FOUR
SEASONS DR.
W
E
S
T
AMETH
Y
S
T
L
N
.
HICKORY
H I L L
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
77thST.W.
PALISADE
CIR.
ERIK'S
BLVD.
KIN G S B U R Y
D R.
CRESTRIDGE CT.
W
I
D
GEON
WAY
HERITAGE
LN.
COUNTRY
CT.
PALIS.
WATERFORDDR.E.
SARTELL AVE.
A P PA L OO S A T R .
WITHAM
LN.
DEERCLIFFCT.
YANKEE
D
O
O
DLE
RD.
B. WAY
SHEVLIN
CT.
DEN M AR K
AVE.
R I D G E
R D .
DIFFLEY ROAD
F
A
I
R
L
A
W
N
P
L.
TODD
AVE.
WESTON
HILLS
PL.
ELRENE R D .
B
.
R
D
G
.
R
D
.
JAMES CT.
W H I T E T A IL WAY
SHALE LANE
N
.
S
V
E
N
S
K
L
N
.
ROLLING
HILLS
CIR.
W
O
O
D
D
U
C
K
C
I
R
.
W
I
L
D
P
.
C
T
.
LASSO
LN.
TAC.TR.
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
G
G
H
H
I
I
J
J
K
K
L
L
12 12
11 11
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Transportation Trails
TransportationTrails & Sidewalks Plowed = 86.62 miles - MapA (66%)
L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\Streets\Plowing\Trails\NewTrailPlowingConsiderations\23-24\CurrentAndNotCurrentPlowedTransportationTrails_MapC.mxd
Date Saved: 5/4/2023
0 ½1 Miles
Map C
Transportation Trails/SidewalksNOT Plowed = 45.12 miles - Map B (34%)
Total Transportation Trails = 131.74 Miles
Agenda Information Memo
May 9, 2023 Special City Council Workshop
IV. Crosswalk Policy Update
Direction For Consideration:
Select one of the following actions:
1) Approve the updated Crosswalk Policy; OR
2) Direct consideration of the updated Crosswalk Policy approval to the following regular
Council meeting on May 16, 2023.
Facts:
The City’s current Crosswalk Policy was adopted by the City Council on June 4, 1996, in
response to 1996 Minnesota legislation revising the traffic laws by requiring vehicles to
stop rather than yield to pedestrians within a crosswalk. The Crosswalk Policy has been
used annually by staff in designing Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) street projects.
In addition to the significant extent of time that has passed since the policy’s adoption,
several additional factors have been developed that are noteworthy considerations in the
evaluation of present-day crosswalks in Eagan.
In 2022, the Dakota County Transportation Department, and its project consultant SRF,
completed a Countywide Pedestrian Crossing Safety Assessment effort. Several cities in
Dakota County, including City of Eagan staff, were involved on the crossing safety
assessment study project management team.
The assessment objectives were to create a standardized, transparent and more
consistent process of guidance and documented best practices for identifying and
evaluating roadway crossings and implementing crossing infrastructure enhancements
when applicable, through a data-driven process. The study created consistent application
guidance for use by all cities in the county.
The assessment included a four-step process:
o Initial review of 15 crossings of various types throughout the County, including
crossings on County roads within the City of Eagan.
o Analysis of subject crossings, including temporary enhancement demonstration
projects, and before and after public engagement surveys.
o Organization of crossing evaluation and guidance process, including data from the
subject crossing locations and research of national/regional best practices.
o Recommendations for the subject crossings.
County Transportation staff are currently using the Pedestrian Crossing Safety
Assessment in their roadway designs and are using the guiding principles in designing
improved crossings in Eagan, including the crossing improvements at Lexington Avenue
(CSAH 43) and Wilderness Run Road, scheduled for construction in 2023.
As the County Pedestrian Crossing Safety Assessment was prepared for use by all cities
within Dakota County, providing the guidance and consistency desired by the City of
Eagan, it is proposed to adopt a synthesized version of the assessment as an update to
the City Crosswalk Policy. This update has details of guidelines and processes for field
review, data collection/analysis, evaluation and engineering review of candidate crossing
enhancement locations.
The updated Crosswalk Policy will continue to be used by City staff in design of CIP street
and trail/sidewalk projects, and in response to resident/user requests.
The updated Policy will also be used in conjunction with other previous City/other agency
pedestrian and bicycle safety efforts, by identifying solutions in engineering, education
and enforcement, including:
o Safe Routes to School (SRTS) promotes walking and bicycling to school through
infrastructure improvements, enforcement, tools, safety education, and
incentives to encourage walking and bicycling to school.
o The City of Eagan’s Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Master Plan (BPTMP,
2020). The BPTMP reflects current and future needs of the community regarding
a bike and pedestrian transportation system and accommodates a financially
responsible way of improving the system over the next twenty years.
o In part because of the development of the Diffley Road School Area
Improvements, Dakota County partnered with MnDOT, local transportation
experts, including City staff, and school district representatives to produce the
Countywide School Safety Assessment (2021). This assessment addresses safety
for students traveling to and from schools adjacent to highways, focusing on those
who walk and bike to school.
On October 18, 2022, the Public Works Committee reviewed the Dakota County
Pedestrian Crossing Safety Assessment and directed Public Works staff to incorporate it
as part of an update consideration for the City’s Crosswalk Policy.
On February 21, 2023, the City Council directed the updated Crosswalk Policy draft to the
May 9 Special Council Workshop for presentation and discussion.
The updated policy draft has been reviewed by Public Works Department personnel and
found to be in order for favorable Council consideration.
Attachments (2)
IV-1 Crosswalk Policy Update
IV-2 Power Point Presentation
CITY OF EAGAN
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK POLICY
DRAFT
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF EAGAN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
February 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1
Minnesota State Statute ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Jurisdictional Authority .............................................................................................................................................. 2
Crossing Guidance ........................................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Field Review and Preliminary Data Collection .......................................................................................... 4
2. Data Collection .................................................................................................................................................... 5
Crossing Identification ........................................................................................................................................... 5
Roadway Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Traffic Data ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Multimodal Data ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
3. Evaluate Candidate Locations ........................................................................................................................ 7
Crossing Types ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
Crossing Considerations ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Criteria Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 11
4. Engineering Review ......................................................................................................................................... 12
Step 1: Traffic Volume Review ........................................................................................................................... 12
Step 2: Roadway Geometric Treatment Assessment ................................................................................ 14
Step 3: Evaluate Crossing Infrastructure Enhancements .......................................................................... 15
Step 4: Further Analysis of Major Enhancements ....................................................................................... 16
Crossing Infrastructure Treatments ................................................................................................................. 18
Removal of Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 22
1
INTRODUCTION
The City of Eagan encourages multimodal transportation to access destinations in daily life and
recreate via the community’s many parks and trails. Eagan continues to receive high citizen survey
satisfaction ratings for ease of walking and biking and for the availability of such infrastructure.
Eagan strives to provide safe, accessible, and efficient travel for all modes of transportation, while
prioritizing the transportation network’s most vulnerable users: people walking, rolling, and
bicycling. As the City strives Toward Zero Deaths within the city’s transportation network, a
consistent application of pedestrian crossing enhancements is critical to best serve all users. Dakota
County began using a pedestrian crossing guidance process developed as a part of the County’s
Pedestrian Crossing Safety Assessment in July 2022. As a partner jurisdiction in Dakota County, the
City of Eagan has adopted Dakota County’s guidance to maintain a consistent application of
crossing enhancements along all city and county roadways.
The purpose of this policy is to leverage the County’s process to guide the City in evaluating and
implementing a pedestrian crossing program that provides people walking, rolling, and bicycling a
safe place to cross while providing motorists reasonable and consistent expectations for where and
what that may look like. This consistent process and application are important for the safety of all
as it sets reliable expectations while traveling throughout the transportation network. The intent is
to ensure a mutual understanding between the City Council, Staff, and residents of Eagan when
presented as part of a public improvement project, or by a citizen or City staff request.
MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE
Minnesota State Statute Chapter 169 defines a crosswalk and pedestrians, as well as the rights of
pedestrians and motorists regarding when and where to yield right-of-way. The definitions and
legal language detailed in this section provide a foundation for how pedestrian crossings are
viewed in Minnesota and considered by this assessment.
169.011 Definitions
Subdivision 20. Crosswalk.
"Crosswalk" means (1) that portion of a roadway ordinarily included with the prolongation or
connection of the lateral lines of sidewalks at intersections; (2) any portion of a roadway distinctly
indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface.
Subdivision 20. Pedestrian.
"Pedestrian" means any person afoot or in a wheelchair.
169.21 Pedestrian
Subdivision 2. Rights in absence of signal.
2
(a) Where traffic-control signals are not in place or in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall stop to
yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a marked crosswalk or at an
intersection with no marked crosswalk. The driver must remain stopped until the pedestrian has
passed the lane in which the vehicle is stopped. No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other
place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for
the driver to yield. This provision shall not apply under the conditions as otherwise provided in this
subdivision.
(b) When any vehicle is stopped at a marked crosswalk or at an intersection with no marked
crosswalk to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway, the driver of any other vehicle approaching
from the rear shall not overtake and pass the stopped vehicle.
(c) It is unlawful for any person to drive a motor vehicle through a column of school children
crossing a street or highway or past a member of a school safety patrol or adult crossing guard,
while the member of the school safety patrol or adult crossing guard is directing the movement of
children across a street or highway and while the school safety patrol member or adult crossing
guard is holding an official signal in the stop position. A peace officer may arrest the driver of a
motor vehicle if the peace officer has probable cause to believe that the driver has operated the
vehicle in violation of this paragraph within the past four hours.
(d) A person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor. A person who violates this
subdivision a second or subsequent time within one year of a previous conviction under this
subdivision is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Subdivision 3. Crossing between intersections.
(a) Every pedestrian crossing a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or at an
intersection with no marked crosswalk shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.
(b) Any pedestrian crossing a roadway at a point where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian
crossing has been provided shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.
(c) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation pedestrians shall
not cross at any place except in a marked crosswalk.
(d) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section every driver of a vehicle shall (1) exercise
due care to avoid colliding with any bicycle or pedestrian upon any roadway and (2) give an
audible signal when necessary and exercise proper precaution upon observing any child or any
obviously confused or incapacitated person upon a roadway.
JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY
This policy applies to streets owned and maintained by the City of Eagan, though Dakota County
will perform the same assessment for their county facilities. The City and County will coordinate
when applicable on projects to ensure proper application of crossing enhancements.
3
CROSSING GUIDANCE
This section provides an evaluation process and guidance for when to consider enhancing a
crossing at uncontrolled intersections and mid-block crossing locations. Enhanced crossing
infrastructure is a key method of improving the safety and comfort of people walking, rolling, and
bicycling (herein referred to as “multimodal users”) traveling throughout the transportation
network, with research on the safety effects of appropriately enhanced crosswalks expanding in
recent years.
An uncontrolled crossing refers to a location where no traffic control (i.e., yield or stop sign, traffic
signal) exists at the point in which people walking, rolling, or bicycling may cross. Uncontrolled
crossings require additional review during planning and design because drivers are not consistently
required to stop. Instead, a driver must recognize the presence of a person crossing and stop
accordingly as required by Minnesota state law. This lack of consistency can create safety
challenges acutely connected to these crossing locations. The FHWA states, “By focusing on
uncontrolled crossing locations, local and state agencies can address a significant national safety
problem and improve quality of life for pedestrians of all ages and abilities.”1 Uncontrolled crossing
locations can be barriers for any multimodal user, notably children, older, and disabled
populations, and require special attention to create a safe environment. Higher speed and traffic
volume environments with multiple lanes are especially challenging and are locations where simply
marking a crosswalk is insufficient.
The objective of this section is to document a process for evaluation and design of crossing
locations and ensure that anyone who wishes to be informed may understand how, where, and
why crossing enhancements are recommended at certain locations based upon a variety of factors
and contexts.
INTRODUCTION
The safety of multimodal users requires a holistic approach that focuses on engineering
(implementing infrastructure improvements), education (for all roadway users), evaluation
(continually collecting key data metrics to better inform decision-making), and encouragement (of
following state laws). Engineering is the first step of this process to ensure the roadway and
associated crossing design can effectively accommodate all users as safely and effectively as
possible. It is important to focus upon the most vulnerable users of the transportation network
throughout the process. Crashes are unacceptable and preventable, and though humans will make
mistakes, Safe System of roadway design must always be considered to ensure a person’s mistake
does not lead to serious injury or death.
1 Federal Highway Administration. (2018). Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, page ii.
4
Determining the appropriateness of enhanced crossing infrastructure requires a thorough review of
the crossing location. The following steps are guidance for using or reviewing this process. Each
crossing location requires staff review and engineering judgement beyond the basic guidelines
included in this chapter and must include context-specific solutions beyond the scope of this
document. Ideally this process is completed during the roadway design process, however, in many
cases review occurs after the roadway is built or a new facility is added. This process is intended to
help guide the reviewer through a methodical and data driven process such that engineering
judgment can be effectively applied.
1. Performing field review and preliminary data collection to understand existing conditions and potential issues. Preliminary data collection includes existing, easily accessible data that is expected to take the reviewer less than 30 minutes and will determine if the crossing is acceptable for additional review performed by steps 2, 3, and 4.
2. Collect data to complete the review using recommended data points included in the Data Collection Form. The process includes the following steps:
a. Identify crossing location.
b. Collect roadway geometric and configuration data.
c. Collect traffic and operational data.
d. Collect multimodal data.
3. Evaluate the point of crossing using the flowchart and perform a high-level review to understand if a location is appropriate for consideration of an enhanced crossing.
4. If the flowchart leads to the conclusion that the consideration of an enhanced crossing is appropriate, continue to engineering review which includes the following steps:
a. Review traffic volumes to determine proper roadway configuration/number of lanes.
b. Determine if roadway geometric treatments are appropriate.
c. Evaluate crossing infrastructure enhancements.
d. Conduct specific warrant analyses or review of grade separation feasibility if applicable.
1. FIELD REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY DATA COLLECTION
Upon identification of a crossing location by preemptive review (e.g., future development, etc.) or
reactive evaluation (e.g., community input, recent crash, etc.), initial field review should be
completed. This first step will aid in determining if an issue(s) is/are present, if other mitigation
measures can be performed external to the process defined by this assessment, or if no additional
follow up is necessary. Staff time and capacity is understood to be limited, and this will ensure that
only crossings with the highest estimated need are provided the level of review described in the
following sections.
5
2. DATA COLLECTION
Data collection is a key component of this analysis. The Data Collection Form should be used for
each study to collect all required data inputs. It is critical that all data points identified below are
collected and properly organized to ensure the crossing location is successfully reviewed for
potential improvements. Sometimes the planner or engineer is very familiar with the location and
may have a good understanding of operations which may allow some of the data to be
“approximated”, though it is important that all data inputs are completed to maintain the integrity
of the process.
Crossing Identification
Major Street: Name of the street crossed by the location under review.
Minor Street or Crossing Location: The connecting street of an intersection or specific
location identified for the mid-block crossing.
Multimodal Generating Land Uses, Destinations, or Activity Centers: Within 660 feet of the
crossing, are there land uses, destinations, or activity centers that could generate trips by
walking, rolling, or bicycling and list those that are pertinent. These could be existing
locations or those planned in the near-term (less than five years).
Roadway Characteristics
Cross-section Type: Urban (curb and gutter) or rural (shoulder and ditch) cross-section.
Roadway Configuration: Configuration of the roadway at the point of crossing which
includes the total number of lanes and if it is divided or undivided.
Total Number of Lanes to Cross: The total number of lanes present at the point of crossing.
Number of Left-turn Lanes: The total number of left-turn lanes present at the point of crossing.
Number of Right-turn Lanes: The total number of right-turn lanes present at the point of crossing.
Stopping Sight Distance: The stopping sight distance in both directions from the point of crossing based upon guidance found in the AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.
Obstruction: Sight distance obstruction present such as a tree, pole, sign, etc. that directly affects the crossing under review.
Traffic Data
Traffic Control: If a crossing under review is at an intersection, identify the traffic control present (side-street stop control, all-way stop, or traffic signal).
Posted Speed Limit: Posted speed limit at the point of crossing.
6
85th Percentile Speed: The 85th percentile speed recorded at the point of crossing.
Existing AADT: The most recent average annual daily traffic available at the point of crossing.
Future AADT: The future average annual daily traffic identified at the point of crossing if available.
Existing V/C: The vehicle-to-capacity based upon the number of lanes and existing AADT at the point of crossing
Future V/C: The vehicle-to-capacity based upon the number of lanes and future AADT at
the point of crossing
Total Crashes: The total number of crashes (all modes) that are recorded at the point of
crossing in the last five years. Highlight serious injury or fatal crashes if present.
Multimodal Data
Sidewalk: Identify if a sidewalk directly connects to the crossing under review.
Shared-use Path: Identify if a shared-use path, sidepath, or multiuse trail directly connects
to the crossing under review.
Crosswalk Lighting: Identify if lighting is present that would illuminate the crossing and
specifically note if that lighting is pedestrian-scale.
Transit Stop: Identify if a bus or transit stop is within 300 feet of the crossing under review.
Multimodal User Volume: Record the three peak hour totals for multimodal users and
specifically identify pedestrians versus bicyclists. User types are further defined under the
“Criteria Definitions” section. A best practice is collecting data between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m.
during warmer months (i.e., April-June or September-October) and when school is in
session. Collecting both a weekday and weekend count is also recommended. Previously
collected count data within two years of this assessment can be applied if location
conditions have not changed significantly.
Multimodal User Volume – Vulnerable Population: Record the three peak hour totals for multimodal users that would identify as vulnerable (i.e., young, older, and/or disabled). User types are further defined under the “Criteria Definitions” section.
Pedestrian Crashes: The total number of pedestrian-involved crashes that are recorded at the point of crossing in the last ten years. Highlight serious injury or fatal crashes and remove preventable crashes (e.g., driver impaired, etc.) if present.
Bicycle Crashes: The total number of bicycle-involved crashes that are recorded at the point of crossing in the last ten years. Highlight serious injury or fatal crashes and remove preventable crashes (e.g., driver impaired, etc.) if present.
Distance to Next Marked Crosswalk: The distance (in feet) between the closest marked crosswalk and the crossing under review.
7
Distance to Next Controlled Crossing: The distance (in feet) between the closest controlled crossing (i.e., traffic/pedestrian signal, all-way stop, PHB, or RRFB) and the crossing under review.
Two-stage Crossing Distance: Total distance to cross (in feet) on either side of the pedestrian refuge island.
Total Crossing Distance: The total crossing distance (in feet) to complete the roadway crossing from curb ramp to curb ramp or curb face to curb face if curb ramps are not
present.
3. EVALUATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS
Once data collection is complete, the candidate crossing location should be evaluated using the
flowchart. Starting at the top, proceed through each criteria box following the path of whether the
data meets that criterion. Progress through the flowchart until reaching one of three boxes at the
bottom which include:
No Action Recommended: The crossing location does not meet one or more criteria and is
not recommended. Directing users to the nearest marked crosswalk should be considered
to reduce risk taking behavior. The nearest marked crosswalk should be consistent with the
guidelines defined in this evaluation process or approved following staff review and
engineering judgement.
Consider an Unmarked Crossing: An “unmarked crossing” is any treatment that improves a
person’s ability to cross a roadway, short of a marked crosswalk with signage or other
enhancements detailed in Step 3 at the crossing location. Installation of this type of
crossing is subject to staff review and engineering judgement and must include ADA-compliant curb ramps, appropriate pedestrian warning signage in advance of the crossing, and roadway geometric improvements if applicable (list of options found below in step 3, the engineering review process). No markings or additional signage beyond pedestrian warning signage are provided to attract or recommend that nonmotorized users cross at the location. The crossing is intended to operate as an improvement for a low volume pedestrian crossing where nonmotorized users are already crossing and will continue to cross at this location or to provide consistency where enhancements are not warranted.
Consideration of a Crossing Enhancement is Appropriate: The crossing location is appropriate for consideration of infrastructure enhancements. Proceed to the engineering review process to complete context-specific analysis, staff review, and engineering judgement.
8
Crossing Types
A pedestrian crossing is the section of the road at an intersection that acts as the prolongation, or
extension, of the sidewalk for people walking, rolling, or bicycling to cross from one side of the
road to the other and at all legs of any intersection. When no sidewalks exist, the crossing is the
portion of the roadway within ten feet of the intersection unless modified by crosswalk markings,
signage, or other infrastructure at a different location such as mid-block (i.e., between two
intersections).
Unmarked crosswalk: A legal crosswalk that does not feature any crosswalk striping or markings.
Marked crosswalk: A legal crosswalk that features crosswalk striping or markings.
Uncontrolled crossing: A legal crossing of a roadway intersection approach or mid-block crossing of a roadway between two intersections not controlled by a stop sign, traffic signal, pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB), or pedestrian signal.
Controlled crossing: A legal crossing of a roadway intersection approach or mid-block
crossing of a roadway between two intersections controlled by a stop sign, traffic signal,
pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB), or pedestrian signal.
Typical crosswalk marking implementation and designs are highlighted in the Minnesota Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) and can include a variety of materials. To improve
motorist vision of a crossing, high visibility markings are recommended (e.g., thermoplastic) when
applicable and notably for higher volume crossings.
Source: Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (left); National Association of City Transportation Officials (right)
Crosswalks that are appropriately marked and enhanced provide pedestrians with convenient
opportunities to cross the street, while maintaining safety. Marked crosswalks are valuable as they
direct pedestrians to a designated place to cross, alert drivers to the potential presence of
pedestrians, and legally establish the crosswalk at non-intersection locations.
9
The MN MUTCD states that a marked crosswalk should not be installed alone without other
measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, and/or provide active
warning of pedestrian presence if the posted speed limit exceeds 40 mph and:
1. Four or more lanes present with no pedestrian refuge island and >12,000 AADT, or
2. Four or more lanes present with a pedestrian refuge island and >15,000 AADT
Crossing Considerations
External to crossing infrastructure, other considerations are important to review prior to potentially
implementing infrastructure enhancements.
Distance Between Crossings
Crosswalk spacing criteria should be determined according to the pedestrian network, built
environment, and observed desire lines. NACTO identifies that if it takes a person more than a
three-minute walk to a crossing, wait to cross the street, and then resume their journey, they may
decide to cross along a more direct, but unsafe or unprotected, route based upon perceived time
savings. While this behavior depends heavily on the speed and volume of motorists, it is imperative
to understand crossing behaviors from a pedestrian’s perspective (i.e., slower travel via a reduced
travelshed). Of note, no state or national guidance exists identifying specific measured distances
between crosswalks or enhanced crossings. Crossing placement is heavily dependent upon the
surrounding context, land use and destinations, network connectivity, block length, and other
factors. A high-level analysis of agency best practices in the United States showed typical marked
crossing spacing from 200 to 600 feet when warranted. A minimum spacing of 300 feet between
signalized crossings is identified in the MN MUTCD (page 4D-1). This spacing could fluctuate based
upon engineering judgement and applicability given the roadway design, configuration, and
intersection placement.
Delay to Cross a Roadway
The multimodal network should be designed in such a way where users are not unreasonably
forced to wait for a gap in traffic or walk out of their way to access a crossing. The Highway
Capacity Manual 6th Edition states that when a pedestrian is forced to wait 30 seconds or more,
they are highly likely to exhibit risk-taking behavior. NACTO also has guidance regarding delay at
signalized and unsignalized crossings. Delays exceeding 40 seconds at signalized crosswalks and
20 seconds at unsignalized, or yield-controlled crosswalks, may cause the pedestrian to exhibit risk-
taking behavior. These are important considerations as another metric to proactively determine
how a crossing could be made safer.
10
11
Criteria Definitions
Additional detail regarding how to navigate each criterion is included by the corresponding
number in the flowchart and footnotes.
Meets minimum multimodal volume threshold: The multimodal user crossing demand during a 24-hour period meets one or more of the following criteria. This is the total after
the 1.33 volume conversion factor is applied for vulnerable population (i.e., children/young
adults (ages 0-17), older adults (60+), and persons with disabilities).
o 1 hour (any hour): 20 crossings per hour
o 2 hours (any two hours): 15 crossings per hour
o 3 hours (any three hours): 10 crossings per hour
Of note, the two- or three-hour counts do not need to be consecutive. Multimodal users include a person walking, rolling (e.g., skateboard, scooter, or other nonmotorized or motorized riding device), bicycling (pedal-powered or e-bike), or using a wheelchair, mobility aid, or other battery power-driven mobility device.
Pedestrian or bicycle involved crash in the last ten years: ≥1 crash involving a multimodal
user at the existing point crossing under review over the last ten years. A crash not
addressable by engineering design (e.g., impaired driver, etc.) does not count.
Location meets the sight distance requirement: The required sight distance for a vehicle to come to a complete stop at the point of crossing per AASHTO’s stopping sight distance outputs using the roadway’s design speed.
Location directly serves a key destination or active transportation facility: Subject to staff review and engineering judgement, examine the surrounding land uses to determine if the proposed crossing directly serves, or is within close proximity, to a key destination or active transportation facility.
Key destinations for consideration could include, but are not limited to: school, hospital, senior center, recreation or community center, library, park, bus stop or transit station, or a key activity center, destination, and/or land use subject to staff review.
Active transportation facilities may include a multiuse trail, shared use path, sidepath, or greenway adopted by a City of Eagan plan, or other local planning document subject to staff review and approval.
Location from the nearest marked crossing: The NACTO defines an approximate three
minute out-of-direction walk as the threshold in which risk-taking behavior by a multimodal
user may then occur. Pedestrians naturally desire to travel along the quickest and most
direct pathway of travel. Utilizing the MN MUTCD’s 3.5 feet per second calculation for
pedestrian travel, that equates to 600 feet total, or 300 feet in either direction from the
crosswalk. These distances could vary and are dependent upon the surrounding context
(i.e., urban, suburban, or rural) and characteristics of the roadway. The minimum distance
allowable is 300 feet between crossings per the MN MUTCD (page 4D-1).
12
Exceptions to Criteria
In some cases, it may be reasonable to allow exceptions to the criteria previously described. Any
exception may require review, consideration, and discussion from city staff and must be clearly
documented including the reason why the criteria exception was required. Examples could include
a location that is identified for consideration of a crossing enhancement but does not meet the
criteria outlined in this document though it has other factors where crossing enhancements may be
applicable. The city may choose not to construct crossings that have a high cost, are not justified
by the project’s benefits, or have constraints present that require significant design. Developers
should coordinate planning, design, and implementation of all crossings with the City of Eagan’s
Public Works Department.
4. ENGINEERING REVIEW
If a location is identified as appropriate for consideration of crossing enhancements in the
flowchart, then the following process should be completed to determine if additional crossing
infrastructure enhancements could be implemented. This is a methodical process that potentially
highlights items not previously considered.
Step 1: Traffic Volume Review
The first step of this process is important as the Potential Crossing Enhancement Matrix relies upon
the number of lanes as one of three key inputs. This step ensures that the number of lanes (travel
and turn lanes) at the point of crossing is adequate for the traffic volumes. Right sizing the crossing
distance is critical to all modes of travel, but particularly important to non-motorized users, as the
goal is to minimize their time in the hazard zone.
1. Analyze existing (and future traffic volumes subject to site-specific engineering judgement)
using the Dakota County capacity thresholds to determine if the roadway design is
appropriate (see Table 1).
Table 1. Dakota County Roadway Capacities
Roadway Design Capacity Range 110% of Capacity
2-lanes 10,000 11,000
3-lanes 18,000 19,800
4+ lanes 35,000 38,500
Source: Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan
13
Four-to-Three Conversion: Often referred to as a “road diet” it reduces the number of travel lanes from four through lanes to two through lanes with a two-way left-turn lane in the center of the roadway. This can both calm traffic, slow speeds, and provide additional roadway space for crossing enhancements such as a pedestrian refuge island. This is an option if the capacity is found to be appropriate for such a conversion based upon county guidance and engineering judgement.
Multilane Threat: Removing lanes can also improve visibility and remove the multilane threat which is when two or more lanes in one direction approach a crossing. When one car stops for a person crossing the roadway, the second car may not be visible to the person crossing nor is that person visible to the second driver.
2. Engineering review of right- and left-turn lanes if applicable at the point of crossing to verify if they are necessary or if they can be removed.
3. If roadway design or turn lanes are appropriate, proceed to Step 2: Roadway Geometric Treatment Options.
4. If roadway design or turn lanes are not appropriate, consider lane reductions or turn lane removal before proceeding. If this is not a near-term option, proceed to Step 2: Roadway Geometric Treatment Options.
14
Step 2: Roadway Geometric Treatment Assessment
Marking a crosswalk is one of many tools that can be used to improve pedestrian conditions.
Before considering additional signage, markings/striping, signals, etc., staff should evaluate the
feasibility of roadway geometric improvements. Minimizing the time that multimodal users are
crossing in the travel lane(s) is important as it reduces crossing width/distance, as well as helps
manage vehicle speeds by narrowing the cross-section and tightening curb radii.
In some cases, moving a crossing away from an intersection to a mid-block location can
significantly reduce the number of conflict points between vehicles and multimodal users thereby
improving overall safety.
The following process reviews opportunities to slow speeds, reduce crossing distance, and improve
visibility of people crossing the roadway.
1. Narrow Travel Lanes: MnDOT identifies the following lane width best practices per the
Performance-Based Practical Design – Process and Design Guidance. These are superseded
by MnDOT’s own design standards though used as an example for consideration by the
City of Eagan. Studies have credited tighter lane widths by neutrally or positively impacting
safety without affecting traffic operations.
Rural Roadways: 11- or 12-foot-wide lanes
Urban and Suburban Roadways: 10-foot-wide lanes (≤35 mph and turn lanes), 11-foot-
wide lanes (suitable for all other typologies), 12-foot-wide lanes (≥50 mph and/or non-
motorized traffic is absent).
2. Reduce Conflict Points: Consider moving the crossing to a location with the least number of
conflict points depending upon engineering judgement. This could include an intersection
leg with lower turning vehicles or overall traffic, as well as moving a crossing entirely out of
an intersection and to a mid-block location.
15
3. Crossing Lighting: Ensure lighting is present that illuminates the entire crossing (curb ramp to curb ramp) per state and federal guidance.
4. Traffic Calming: Context-specific traffic calming measures using geometric improvements should always be considered. Each item is further defined in the section below.
Curb Radius: Review the turning curb radius to understand if a reduced radius can be achieved based upon context-specific needs and design vehicles (i.e., if the roadway is a freight or bus route). Reducing the radius to as small as practical can create significant
benefits via reduced crossing distance and vehicle turning speeds. Curb radius design
should be based upon roadway type, crossing activity, and turning vehicle needs.
Curb Extension: An extension or bump out of the curb into the roadway and typically a
minimum of six-feet-wide though design is context specific. This could include removal
or narrowing of a roadway shoulder to reduce the crossing distance. Special attention
should be given to existing on-street bicycle infrastructure (e.g., bike lane) to ensure it
does not remove space at the intersection for that connection.
Pedestrian Refuge Island: A raised median that is a minimum of eight-feet-wide though
ten-feet or greater is preferred to ensure it is wide enough to accommodate bikes.
Several more traffic calming infrastructure opportunities are identified in best practice
documents and guidance (e.g., NACTO, ITE, FHWA, etc.) and could be implemented
based upon staff review and engineering judgement.
Step 3: Evaluate Crossing Infrastructure Enhancements
Review the crossing enhancement evaluation matrix to determine potential infrastructure
improvements at the point of crossing. The improvement options are divided into four options
which are further described in the matrix table below.
Consider Lane Reduction: Review the existing and future roadway volumes to determine if a lane reduction can be implemented prior to potential crossing improvements to maximize crossing infrastructure and minimize cost.
Markings and Signage: The most basic treatment for a location that qualifies for enhanced crossing. Two different scenarios for marking and signage (M&S 1 and M&S 2) specify which signs and roadway markings are included.
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon: Rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) are generally designed for locations with higher traffic volumes and pedestrian activity. Three different scenarios for RRFBs (RRFB 1, RRFB 2, and RRFB 3) specify which combination of markings and signs should be used in coordination with the RRFBs.
Further Analysis Required: An engineering assessment is required to determine if a pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) or pedestrian signal are warranted per the MN MUTCD
(which both require higher pedestrian volumes), as well as pedestrian demand, roadway
conditions and context, and available gaps in traffic. The need for, and feasibility of, a
grade-separated pedestrian crossing requires a more detailed engineering review to
16
understand the feasibility and cost. They are most applicable for highly used trail or greenway crossings, as well as high demand locations of high speed, multi-lane roadways, expressways, and freeways.
Step 4: Further Analysis of Major Enhancements
This step considers warrants found in the MN MUTCD for pedestrian hybrid beacons or pedestrian
signals subject to engineering judgement and review of applicability. The feasibility of grade-
separation may also be studied and is dependent upon context-specific needs.
17
18
Crossing Infrastructure Treatments
The following section describes crossing infrastructure to illustrate the universe of opportunities to
mark/stripe, sign, and implement geometric improvements to upgrade locations for crossing a
roadway by walking, rolling, or bicycling. The list is not exhaustive and only highlights key
treatments beyond typical pedestrian crossing and warning signage, or in-street pedestrian signs.
Guidance of infrastructure treatments and best practices continues to grow nationally and should
be reviewed during some frequency to ensure the latest enhancements are understood (i.e., type,
impact, cost, etc.). Of note, construction estimates, and crash reduction percentages are from
MnDOT’s Best Practices for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety (2021) or the FHWA.
Lane Reduction
A road diet reconfigures the roadway by converting a
four-lane (or sometimes more), undivided roadway into
a three-lane roadway with two through lanes and a
two-way left-turn lane in the center of the roadway. The
three-lane configuration provides added space to
implement a pedestrian refuge island or landscaped
median, bike infrastructure, and other elements for
traffic calming. This is a candidate treatment for any
undivided road with wide travel lanes or multiple lanes
that can be narrowed or repurposed to improve
pedestrian crossing safety. It is a proven safety strategy for reducing crashes per the FHWA with a
typical crash reduction of 19 to 47 percent. Typically, a roadway with 20,000 AADT or less is a good
candidate for a four- to three-lane conversion, though some examples in the United States have
shown successful conversions with traffic volumes as high as 26,000 AADT in addition to lower
turning volumes. Average cost of implementation is $25,000 to $40,000 per mile.
Curb Radii
Source: Federal Highway Administration
Source: Federal Highway Administration
19
Tightened curb radii provide several benefits including shortened crossing distance, slowed turning
vehicle speeds, and a larger pedestrian-realm. An actual curb radius of five to ten feet should be
considered whenever possible, and not to exceed 30 feet.2 The effective curb radius should be
minimized whenever possible and increased to accommodate turning buses or large trucks when
absolutely required. In most conditions, the roadway has passenger vehicles or smaller trucks and,
in some cases, large vehicles overtaking a lane to complete their turn should be acceptable unless
specific issues are identified per staff review and engineering judgement. Creative designs can also
be employed such as staggered stop bars and/or truck aprons to accommodate larger vehicle
turning movements.
Curb Extension
A curb extension is an extension of the sidewalk and curb line into the roadway to reduce
pedestrian crossing distance and exposure to vehicles. They also provide visual cues to drivers and
improve vision of pedestrians crossing while reducing turning speeds. It is a proven safety strategy
for reducing crashes per the FHWA with a typical crash reduction of 45 percent. Curb extensions
can double as a traffic calming device in mid-block locations as pinch points or chicanes. Average
cost is $2,000 to $3,500 per corner without storm sewer impacts and $10,000 to $20,000 per corner
if storm sewer is impacted.
2 Minnesota Department of Transportation. (January 2016). Infrastructure Reference Guide.
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/mnsaferoutes/assets/downloads/MnDOT_SRTS_InfrastrctureReferenceGuide.pdf
The impact for driver sight of people crossing with the addition of curb extensions shown at right.
Source: National Association of City Transportation Officials.
20
Pedestrian Refuge Island
A pedestrian refuge island (i.e., a median) are raised
areas that are constructed in the center of the roadway
and serve as a place of refuge for people who cross
mid-block or at an intersection and shorten the
crossing distance. They allow people crossing to
concentrate their attention on one direction of traffic at
a time and allow users to wait for motorists and find an
adequate gap in traffic before crossing the second half
of the street. It is a proven safety strategy for reducing
crashes per the FHWA with a typical crash reduction of
46 to 54 percent. Average total costs vary.
Crossing Lighting
Crosswalk lighting is a strategy that installs streetlights at, and in advance of, intersections and
crosswalks to improve visibility and safety of the person crossing. It is a proven safety strategy for
reducing crashes per the FHWA with a typical crash reduction of 42 percent. The lux (amount of
light in lumens per square meter) is recommended at 20 to 40 lux at five feet above the road
surface to provide adequate vertical illumination within a crosswalk. Lighting is particularly
important at mid-block crossings and should illuminate the entire crossing form curb ramp to curb
ramp as illustrated above. Average cost is $10,000 to $40,000 per intersection.
Advanced Stop Bar and Signage
An advanced stop bar is typically striped 20 feet to
50 feet in advance of a marked crosswalk to
encourage drivers to stop further back from the
crossing which enhances the comfort for those
crossing. The stop bar and corresponding sign also
provides the key benefit for multilane roadways of
removing the multilane threat by improving the
visibility of a crossing pedestrian for motorists.
Source: National Association of Transportation Officials (left), Federal Highway Administration (right)
Source: National Association of Transportation Officials
Source: Federal Highway Administration
21
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
A crossing enhancement that is activated by a
pedestrian and uses two rapid and alternate
flashing yellow rectangular beacons. RRFBs are
applicable on roadways with higher pedestrian
demand, traffic volumes, and traffic speeds. It is a
proven safety strategy for reducing crashes per the
FHWA with a typical crash reduction of 47 percent.
Average cost is $15,000 to $50,000 per crossing or
$80,000 to $100,000 for an overhead system.
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)
A pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB), formerly known
as a HAWK, is a beacon installed to warn and
control traffic by having vehicles stop with a red
light. It consists of two red lenses and one yellow
lens and is dark until pedestrian activated. PHBs are
applicable on high speed, multilane roadways, with
higher traffic volumes and where RRFBs are no
longer a viable safety solution, such as when gaps
in traffic are not sufficient. If PHBs are not already
familiar to a community, agencies should conduct appropriate education and outreach as part of
implementation. It is a proven safety strategy for reducing crashes per the FHWA with a typical
crash reduction of 55 percent. Average cost is $100,000 to $170,000 per crossing. Of note, if
pedestrian demand is higher, a pedestrian signal should be explored in lieu of a PHB. A pedestrian
signal is a traffic signal placed at a pedestrian crossing and does not refer to a signalized
intersection.
Source: National Association of Transportation Officials
Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation
22
Grade-separated Crossing
Vertical separation of a pedestrian crossing (over or under a roadway) are most applicable for high
volume and high speed roadways, railroads, and other topographically challenging locations or
physical barriers. The overpass or underpass should always try to be conveniently located to
reduce out-of-direction travel. It is a proven safety strategy for reducing crashes per the FHWA
with a typical crash reduction of 87 percent. Cost is typically significant and can vary wildly and is
dependent upon the surrounding context.
Removal of Infrastructure
Conditions that contribute to the need for a crossing enhancement may change over time, or a
crossing may no longer be needed. When a roadway surface is to be impacted by reconstruction
or resurfacing, a review should be performed to determine their use and need. If a crosswalk or
crossing meets the criteria outlined in this assessment, it should be maintained. If it does not meet
the criteria, it should be brought to the City Engineer for consideration of removal. In lieu of a
removal, a crossing may also be reviewed for changes to align with the latest guidance or changing
conditions.
Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation
Crosswalk
Policy Update
May 9, 2023
City Council Workshop
Changes from Current Crosswalk Policy (1996)
Research/compilation of state, regional and national studies, best
practices
County Crossing Safety Assessment (2022)
Research/ implementation tests/ public surveys –various
roadway/ intersection types (City/cities involvement)
Completed with city use intended
Need for Changes in Crosswalk Policy
Consistency Citywide, Countywide, hopefully statewide
•Response to requests and application
•Expectations of Pedestrians/ drivers
Peds -Where best to cross
Drivers -where peds may be
•Used where most effective and appropriate for
ped/driver expectations
•County using in design & implementing improvements
–Lex/Wilderness Run Rd, new County Roads
•Balance between no enhancements and at all
intersections
Data/ Characteristics
Similar to other roadway/intersection design elements
Pedestrian generators/ destinations
Sight distances
Distance to nearest controlled intersection
Vehicle volume (available gaps) & speed
Data-driven while still allowing judgement/public input
Guidelines –Implementation/ Application
No change to pavement markings/
signage to pedestrian flashing beacons
Data-driven while still allowing
judgement/public input
To be used where most effective and
appropriate for ped/driver expectations
New roadway design, street improvement
projects/collector roadways, requests from
residents and City staff
Guidelines –Implementation/ Application
Safety for all transportation users requires a collaborative approach
All users must still be active participants in safety
Policy is a living document -Update every 5-10 years or as best practices
or technology change
Use with other safety plans in place (Bike/Ped Transportation
Management Plan, Safe Routes To School, Safe Streets for All Action Plan)
Filling trail/sidewalk gaps, getting peds off collector streets
Agenda Information Memo
May 9, 2023 Special City Council Workshop
V. Public Works 5-Year CIP (2024-2028)
Direction For Consideration:
Affirm (or Revise) the Public Works Department’s draft 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP), 2024-2028, and direct it to the June 6, 2023, regular Council meeting for formal
consideration of adoption.
Facts:
Every year, the City Council adopts a Capital Improvement Plan for the City that
becomes the planning guide for programming and scheduling various capital
improvements. It is comprised of five parts:
o Equipment & Vehicles
o Facilities Renewal & Replacement
o Parks Infrastructure
o Public Works Infrastructure
o New Facilities
The Public Works Department has completed the preparation of its draft 5-Year CIP,
2024-2028, and would like to review it with the Council and incorporate any
comments or revisions before presenting it for formal consideration and adoption at
a regular Council meeting.
Maps of the proposed first two years’ programmed improvements (2024 & 2025) are
included separate from the overall CIP documents.
Attachments: (5)
V-1 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, 2024-2028 Memo
V-2 CIP Financing Plans & Pro-Forma Exhibits
V-3 2024 CIP Projects Exhibit & Approved Project List
V-4 2025 CIP Projects Exhibit & Approved Project List
V-5 Power Point Presentation
1
Memo
To: Mayor & City Council
c/o Dianne Miller, City Administrator
From: Russ Matthys, Director of Public Works
Date: May 1, 2023
Subject: 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), 2024-2028
Annually, the City Council is provided with an assortment of public infrastructure improvements
to be considered for construction over the following five years. The collection of improvements is
organized to allow the Council to see the variety of needs that the City has for its public systems
and the anticipated costs for said enhancements. The proposed public improvements are sorted
into categories that are distinctly unique to their funding sources and summarized collectively.
Cost analyses are similarly provided to ensure clarity of City finances. City staff who have
prepared this information meet with the Council to deliver a summary of the drafted
presentation. Discussion of more significant or unique improvements is encouraged and
questions are welcomed. At the close of the conversation, Council provides staff with the
direction needed to proceed with the desired projects. So, here we go.
While data is collected throughout the year and various analyses are ongoing, the concentrated
effort to review and evaluate the condition of the City’s infrastructure while considering the
related costs typically begins in earnest at the beginning of each year. A consortium of Public
Works and Finance staff interact to produce the document on the screen before you. The result
of these efforts has offered guidance for the Council for more than three decades. It is with
confidence that I can state that you won’t find a more thoroughly prepared improvement guide.
To date, the cost estimates of the proposed improvements have been based upon the present
value. Such estimates have been appropriate throughout much of the 34 years of CIP
preparation, typically being used in reference to construction bids received 12 to 18 months
after the estimate creation. The estimates have also been adequate for financial planning over
the five-year period.
As the Council has recognized over the past 6 months, multiple recent contract bids have been
submitted that are more than the original CIP estimates. Several significant factors have
occurred in the past 12-24 months that have had a cost increasing effect on these bid prices for
public improvements. Apparent impacts include the lack of available experienced construction
personnel, reduced material quantities, supply chain delays, higher material costs, and lack of
timely utility locations.
2
To alleviate the recent need for CIP funding amendments, staff is following a Public Works
Committee recommendation from their last meeting. Staff has prepared the CIP cost estimates
by focusing on the first two years and incorporating referenced inflationary factors. Utilizing the
most recent bid history of similar projects, current economic impacts and material availability,
and regional experience with comparable public improvements, staff was able to refine the
estimates for years one and two. Reduced inflationary factors were applied to years 3 through 5,
keeping annual changes consistent. Ideally, the estimates may be fairly accurate over the initial
12-24 months after the CIP approval. Staff may bring CIP amendments as needed to the
Council and the Finance Department may need to set aside funding for future adjustments, but
staff anticipates less need than with the current present value cost estimates.
This annual introduction of the Public Works Department’s 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan is
a good reminder of the need for good asset management and financial planning. It ensures the
high quality of life experienced by the residents, businesses, and visitors of Eagan as we
provide the services essential to their prosperity. This CIP has been coordinated with both the
current and proposed CIP’s for Dakota County and MnDOT, unless otherwise noted.
HIGHLIGHTS
While the 5-year CIP is always a financial analysis exercise, the fiscal discussion in preparing it
has never been as robust as it was in the preparation of this document. In addition to the
previous mention of the increasing cost factors, other topics with a financial aspect included
bonding and debt service payments, utility rates, and the Transportation Infrastructure Needs
Analysis, 2021 (TINA) and Infrastructure Needs Analysis, 2021 (INA).
The 2024-2028 version of the CIP is the first in 25 years to include non-state aid capital bonding
for financing sources and debt service payments for expenditures. Recommendations from the
most recent Utility Rate Study (Northland Public Finance, 2021) suggested building up fund
balances to create cash reserves that would allow future utilities improvements to be paid from
a combination of cash and bonding. This approach is newer to the city and is necessary to
maintain appropriate utility rate levels while addressing improvements to the aging utility
infrastructure. There is $16.75 million of funding for proposed utilities improvements to be
bonded in 2025 and 2027 as part of this draft CIP. This results in positive cash balances
available for future utilities improvements in accordance with the previous Council direction
(March 9, 2021). Debt service payments are a required result of such financing and are
estimated in the CIP Summary as expenditures.
Another recommendation of Northland’s evaluation of the INA was increases in the user rates in
the utility bill and the addition of an Infrastructure Fee. Suggested rates were provided by
Northland based upon the projected costs in the INA. As part of the preparation of the CIP, staff
evaluated the proposed CIP in lieu of the INA and applied the same Northland philosophy for
the financing of the associated utility funds. As a result, revenue projections are based on
proposed annual utility bill increases of 8% over the five-year period. Applying such annual rate
increases would find Eagan’s utility rates remaining in the lower half of comparable (AE2S
Annual Utility Rate Survey) metro area cities’ rates (assuming other cities continue their past
rate practices). Water conservation, while desirable, will also have an impact on utility bill
revenue and is being observed by staff for consideration of inclusion in future CIP evaluations.
Refinement of the TINA due to recent noteworthy cost increases and revenue decreases and
planned INA enhancements through scheduled field research and associated routine evaluation
will augment the results provided by both analyses. Plans to coordinate Pavement Management
Program schedules and methods with utility infrastructure repairs and replacement will lead to
3
further augmentation of both TINA and INA and a likely combining of the two individual efforts in
the future. A much more complex public improvement process will evolve with the benefit of
providing enhanced data for capital improvement scheduling and the application of the Utility
Rate Study recommendations. This substantial effort will provide guidance for the preparation of
upcoming CIPs that will enable the lowest utility rates practical and minimized property taxes
associated with the Major Street Fund. Staff will seek Council direction on an update of the
TINA and will be initiating field utilities investigations this summer, with the hope that both efforts
will be used in the preparation of the 2025-2029 CIP and beyond. Additional similar future
utilities field research will enable further CIP enhancements.
It is the responsibility of Eagan’s Public Works Department to ensure the City is continuing to
support safe and well-maintained public systems with the available funding. As the city has
grown and aged, staff has recognized potential funding challenges to provide desirable and high
functioning public systems. The suggested TINA/INA refinements will enable maximization of
the funding sources for all the utility or enterprise funds. This will be critical to the long-term
success of the streets and utilities and the economic well-being of the City’s tax payers and
utility customers.
The Council is able to review the Public Works Department’s CIP improvements online.
Citizens, upon Council approval of the CIP, can use this application for financial planning
regarding the payment of a future assessment, coordinating schedules for significant events, or
ensuring the transparent use of tax dollars. Together with feasibility report data and final cost
information, the application serves as a convenient view of the public improvements completed
in the city from the initial planning stage to the final payment upon completion. The CIP Web
application is one of many ways Public Works staff successfully promotes smart initiatives.
To see information/maps for any of the draft CIP categories, you will need to go to the following
link on your computer: https://arcg.is/1S9vr1. Use this link to view the full draft CIP. Please
contact me with any questions regarding your accessibility to this information.
The adoption of the 2024-2028 CIP will again include a request of the Council to authorize the
initiation of the public improvement process, and associated expenditures, for the first two years
of the CIP. The approval of the improvement process would include the 2024 and 2025
programmed improvements. This practice authorizes an earlier commencement of the public
improvement process for projects and has proven valuable so that preliminary work, such as
system modeling, analysis, and easement acquisition can begin early enough to accommodate
the actual construction schedule, when needed.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
As stated, the CIP is a detailed summary of the management of the City’s capital improvements,
including fiscal responsibility. Staff anticipates the future infrastructure needs of the city and
establishes access to the necessary funding sources, programs and opportunities to provide the
ongoing revenues necessary to build and maintain a sustainable system in a planned and
orderly manner. The City of Eagan has the following available revenue sources:
• Municipal State Aid (Gas & Motor Vehicle Sales Taxes, etc.)
• Special Assessments
• Connection Charges & User/Utility Fees
• Property Taxes
• Development Fees
• Agency Grants and/or participatory funding programs
4
A 5-year CIP is vital to evaluating the construction and maintenance needs against the current
available and projected fund balances so that fiscally prudent decisions can be made in a timely
and planned manner. In addition to the projected expenditures for the next 5 years (2024 to
2028), the financial summaries following this memo take into account the outstanding financial
obligations and revenues committed for the current year (2023) providing a 6-year window of
evaluation.
The recommendations of the latest Utility Rate Study, including the proposed rate increases,
have been re-evaluated in comparison to the draft 2024-2028 CIP, as stated. To maintain
appropriate utility rate levels to address current and future construction costs, staff will continue
to evaluate rate adjustments annually. Staff plans to continue to provide updated evaluations by
comparing future CIPs to the projections in the TINA/INA, as well. The financial attachments to
this memo include revenue from newly revised utility rates. An evaluation of the current funding
source designations for all the utility funds was completed for this draft CIP and is planned for
implementation upon approval. This will ensure the utilized financing plans will accurately
address future projected CIP needs.
When reviewing the All-Fund summary (Exhibit 3), you will note that the Major Street Fund, at
$48.9 million comprises approximately 44% of the total obligations ($111.5 million) in this CIP. A
few highlights should be noted regarding the projected revenues into the Major Street Fund.
Transportation - Major Street Fund
There are two significant sources to the revenue stream that finance the transportation elements
of the CIP.
• Municipal State Aid (MSA) - This is the City's share of state gas taxes, license tab fees
and vehicle sales taxes. Future legislative action may address increases in the gas tax
or provide other means in which to increase the state’s contribution to this funding
source, although history indicates this is unlikely. The MSA formula used to calculate
each city's allocation is maintaining allocations to the City slightly reduced from the
previous allotments.
• Major Street Fund Levy - This is funded completely as a portion of the City’s property
taxes collected through Dakota County. The 2023 allocation is $3.17 million. In 2008, the
Council included an additional $1 million levy to the Major Street Fund account
earmarked for future “Overpasses and Interchanges,” which contributed funding to the
Northwood Parkway and Duckwood Drive overpasses. There are no future projects
proposed that would fall under this improvement category. With the completion of these
improvements, this additional contribution is planned to end in 2025 as the initial
construction cost of these overpasses is fully addressed. The 2026 allocation will drop to
$2.82 million. Future overpass costs to address renovations of these significant assets
will need to be considered with all other street assets.
The Major Street Fund Pro-Forma (Exhibit 1) shows that the Fund’s projected Beginning Cash
Balance in 2023 of $14.5 million will drop to approximately $8.1 million at the end of the
proposed 5-year CIP (2028). This reduction of the Major Street Fund is a continuation of the
more recent projections of past CIPs. The number of street projects are increasing as they
address both initial overlays and second round overlays due to the aging of Eagan. Significant
cost increases have already arrived and more substantial improvements, i.e. reconstruction, will
soon become more commonplace, so the downward trend in the fund is expected to continue
without any revenue increases.
5
All Funds Analysis
Currently, the City has approximately $49.1 million of open contracts and approved financial
obligations through 2023 for all Transportation and Utility improvements (Exhibit 2 - “Capital
Improvement Plan - SUMMARY”). The enclosed 5-year CIP (’24 -’28) identifies an additional
$141.1 million of proposed improvements and other financial obligations over the next 5 years.
While this indicates an average of $28.2 million/year, $21.0 million of the estimated costs are for
regional improvements, with $52.7 million being funded by non-City resources (including nearly
all the regional improvements cost). An average cost of $17.8 million per year results with the
exemption of these projects and non-City funds. With the Utility Rate Study recommendation of
bonding for future utility system improvements, bond proceeds are a new additional financing
source that have been included in this analysis.
The Finance Department's analysis incorporated the current Cash Balance of $51.9 million (all
funds as of 12-31-22) (Exhibit 3) along with the 2023-2028 projected revenues of $120.0 million
($107.8 in User Fees & $12.2 in Capital Bonds) and proposed 2023-2028 expenditures of
$111.7 million and projects a net positive balance of $60.2 million at the end of the CIP period.
BACKGROUND
I. Pavement Management
Streets
The Pavement Management Program (PMP) incorporates various pavement maintenance
and rehabilitation strategies to help extend the life expectancy of our streets. An annual
inventory of the pavement condition rating of all of the streets combined with the age and
previous maintenance history helps determine which maintenance strategy would be most
effective in extending the life expectancy and maximizing the City’s return on its initial capital
investment (See the TINA for more details). The surface condition of one third of the city
streets is rated each year.
The Public Works Department reviews and updates the surface condition of all Eagan
streets by assigning a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to every street segment. This rating
process allows the City to estimate where any given street segment is in its projected life
cycle. The PMP incorporates a Council adopted goal of maintaining a system wide annual
average PCI of 75. At 2022-year end, the average PCI was 72.1.
Trails
A modified PMP has been implemented for the recreational and transportation trails
throughout the city. Because trails are not susceptible to the stresses associated with heavy
vehicles, and smaller surface irregularities are more safety sensitive to users, the street
PMP cannot be used without modifications. Staff has to rely on past experience combined
with intuitive analyses to estimate the needs for this 5-year CIP. City facility parking lots are
also evaluated through the modified PMP and are represented herein.
Staff’s intention is that this CIP implements the most cost effective, timely and long-term
maintenance program that allows the City to continue to meet our policy standards and plan for
a projected 50+ year life cycle for its transportation system. The forthcoming combination of the
TINA and INA will provide enhanced data for capital improvement scheduling and will influence
the PMP schedules and rehabilitation methods as they are coordinated with utility infrastructure
repairs and replacement. This additional effort will provide supplementary guidance for the
preparation of upcoming CIPs.
6
II. Comprehensive Master Plans
The City prepares and periodically updates Master Plans for each of the major infrastructure
systems (Finished Water, Stormwater, Wastewater, Water Quality & Wetland Management,
Transportation, and Bike and Pedestrian Transportation). The Council has considered these
updated Master Plans, as required by state law, and the improvements in this CIP are in
conformance and compliance with the most current adopted Master Plans. The improvement
schedules compliment the City’s projected development, growth and maintenance demands, but
are also flexible based on internal fiscal constraints or partnering agency funding participation
opportunities.
PROCESS
Due to project complexities, desired public notification and participation process, combined with
the County, State and Federal agencies’ funding application, review and approval schedules, it
is necessary to consider adoption of the 5-Year CIP during early spring (May-June). The
adoption of the CIP in this time frame allows the City to better coordinate with other agency’s
CIPs, prepare the necessary feasibility reports, hold the public hearings and advertise for bids
for approved projects in the most economical season (winter/spring). The following is a
summary of some of the more significant or higher profile projects included in this 5-year
program as well as those that are not in conformance with other agencies’ CIPs.
STREETS/HIGHWAYS
A. Regional Transportation Improvements
The Regional Transportation Improvements category includes projects of regional
significance. The CIP includes funding to assist in the studies of future projects through the
County’s Sales Tax Program (Highway 3 Corridor, Lone Oak Road), and traffic analyses for
arterials in response to citizen requests. This category includes County trail studies and the
construction of new noise walls. The following are updates on more noteworthy projects:
1. Lexington Avenue – Diffley Road to Wescott Road (2024) – Improvements include a
road diet (reduce from 4 lanes to 3 lanes) for this County highway and the installation of
a pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Northview Park Road. The City cost would be
in accordance with the County’s Transportation Policy. ($0.1M)
2. Lone Oak Road Upgrade – Highway 13 to Pilot Knob Road (2025) – A 2022 study
addressed improvements to the current county highway, including drainage and trail
interests. Numerous communication efforts have occurred with adjacent property owners
in recognition of possible changes. The City's share is in accordance with the County’s
Transportation Policy. ($0.7M)
3. Cliff Road/Highway 3 Intersection Improvements (2027) – Improvements currently being
completed on Cliff Road stop short of the intersection at Highway 3. The proposed $5M
intersection project would be reflective of the TH 3 Corridor Study and new Cliff Road
improvements, benefitting both Cliff Road and TH 3. The City's share would be in
accordance with the County’s Transportation Policy. ($0.4M)
4. Argenta Trail/I-494 Interchange Study – Dakota County, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights
(2027) – The 2027 study would provide preliminary engineering design of a new
interchange to address safety and regional traffic capacity needs in NE Eagan and NW
Inver Grove Heights. Design would be used to pursue federal approval. ($0.03M)
7
B. Arterials & Collectors
The vast majority of street improvements within the City are life-extending maintenance
overlays. Additional, but infrequent, improvements include an occasional upgrade of an
existing collector through the addition of turn lanes or driving lanes or the construction of a
new collector street.
C. Local Street Improvements
As with the Arterials and Collectors, the vast majority of Local Street Improvements are life-
extending maintenance overlays. A greater number of the overlays included in the CIP are
proposed to include the complete milling of the entire street surface (Resurface), rather than
milling only the edge of the street nearest the curb and gutter (Overlay), followed by the
placement of a typical bituminous wear course (overlay). Utilities improvements are
commonly included as part of such projects. These associated non-Major Street Fund costs
are being distinguished in more detail for each relevant department (Water, Sewer, Storm).
D. Trails
The CIP incorporates trails and sidewalks designed for non-vehicular transportation that are
adjacent to streets and highways, as well as recreational trails internal to the City’s parks, in
accordance with the Community Trail System Policy. Numerous new trail projects are
proposed as recommended in the Council approved Bike and Pedestrian Transportation
Master Plan (BPTMP) as well as several maintenance overlays similar to our local street
program. Increased advance public outreach efforts by City staff will be implemented for
pedestrian and bike enhancements related to street overlays. County Greenway projects
can significantly add to Eagan’s bike/walkability. The Mendota – Lebanon Hills and Veterans
Memorial Greenways will be constructed without City cost participation and have not been
included here. The proposed increase to the trail system would be financed by the Major
Street Fund and special assessments.The following summarizes noteworthy CIP projects:
1. Dodd Road Trail Extension – Red Pine Lane to Parkside Circle (2024) – New trail
segments would be installed along the west side of Dodd Road to extend the existing
trail, without interruption, to the undeveloped property north of 120th Street. ($0.32M)
2. Slater Road/Cinnamon Ridge Trail – Cinnamon Ridge Park to Cliff Road (2024) – A new
trail would be installed on the west side of street as recommended in the BPTMP to
connect neighborhoods to trail system. ($0.64M)
3. Nicols Road Sidewalk – Erin Drive (South) to Cliff Road (2024) – New sidewalk
segments would be installed along the west side of Nicols Road. ($0.38M)
4. Daniel Drive/Trenton Trail – Diffley Road to Trenton Trail (2025) – A new trail would be
installed on the west side of street as recommended in the BPTMP to connect the
neighborhoods to trail system. Similar proposals have led to resident concerns twice
previously; as recent as 2021. ($0.09M)
5. Golden Meadow Road Sidewalk – Daniel Drive to Dodd Road (2025) – New sidewalk
would be installed along Golden Meadow Road as recommended in the BPTMP to
connect neighborhood to trail system. Proposed 100% assessed per policy. ($0.51M)
6. Blackhawk Road/Highline Trail – Crossing Enhancement (2026) – A new Rectangular
Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB) would be installed on this crossing of Blackhawk Road
as recommended in the BPTMP as a safety enhancement to the trail system. ($0.09M)
7. Mike Collins Drive Sidewalk/Trail – Yankee Doodle Road to Borchert Lane (2027) – New
sidewalk or trail would be installed along east side of Mike Collins Drive as
recommended in the BPTMP to connect Thresher Park to trail system. ($0.93M)
8
E. Street Sealcoat (Surface Maintenance)
Periodic aggregate chip sealcoat treatments have been shown to provide cost effective
preventative maintenance for extending the life cycle of streets. Based on the Pavement
Management Program previously adopted by the City Council, streets are sealcoated
approximately 3-4 years after original construction or latest re-surfacing. A life-extending
overlay occurs when the street surface is approximately 18-22 years old. The cycle then
repeats itself providing a 50-60 year life expectancy for the street that would include three
sealcoats. The magnitude of this improvement is directly related to the size and schedule of
the Arterial/Collector/Local street resurfacing programs contained in the 5-year CIP.
F. Signals and Intersection Improvements
Presently, there are 71 signalized intersections within the City limits with only 5 under the
City’s jurisdiction. All others are under the State or County jurisdiction with various levels of
City financial obligations for major improvements. This 5-Year CIP identifies 8 specific
intersection improvements, including 6 Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) installations on MnDOT
signals. The following details the more significant projects:
1. Cliff Road @ Slater Road – Signal Replacement (2024) – These improvements address
the standard replacement of a traffic signal due to age. ($0.59M)
2. Yankee Doodle Road @ Mike Collins Drive & Elrene Road – Signal Installation &
Intersection Reconfiguration (2024) – These long-expected improvements per
recommendations in the Yankee Doodle Road Corridor Study would provide a signal at
Elrene Road with a likely ¾ intersection at Mike Collins Drive. Improvements would
accommodate both existing traffic and future development at Thomson Reuters site.
Turning movement counts will be collected for both intersections. ($0.36M)
3. Cliff Road @ Beacon Hill Road/Thomas Center Drive/Thomas Lake Road – Signal
Replacement & Possible Relocation (2025) – The standard replacement of this traffic
signal due to age will raise the question of proper location of a signalized intersection.
The improvements could result in the relocation of the signal to the Thomas Lake Road
intersection with modifications at Beacon Hill Road/Thomas Center Drive. ($0.25M)
4. Highway 55 @ Blue Water Road - Intersection Reconfiguration (2027) – Modifications
will result in a ¾ intersection to enhance the safety for access to the state highway. A
new signal is not included. MnDOT will complete the improvements with no City cost.
5. Pilot Knob Road @ Wescott Road/Kings Wood Pond Road – Signal Replacement (2028)
– These improvements address the standard replacement of a traffic signal due to age.
($0.22M)
G. Streetlights
This element pertains to the installation or upgrade of streetlights at major intersections, the
maintenance painting of traffic signals, and the maintenance painting of City-owned street
lights (Promenade, Central Parkway, and Cedar Grove areas only). This CIP includes the
retrofit of some of the City’s lights to LED in 2026. It does not include the installation of
residential neighborhood lights or continuous commercial street lighting typically associated
with new developments but would intend to address the replacement or upgrade of such
lights, as needed. ($1.4M)
While this program has been typically modest as it was based on an annual inventory of
minimal needs along the arterial and collector routes, recent discussions with Xcel Energy
have indicated upcoming cost increases. Specific cost details will only be provided by Xcel
on a case-by-case basis, but existing streetlights in excess of 25 years old within the Xcel
9
Energy service area will not be serviced unless replaced, with the City expected to cover
100% of the replacement cost. This cost would be a new cost to the CIP. The proposed
utility rate increases would address these increased costs.
H. Other (Parking Lots, Utility Sites, Transit, Right-of-Way Assets, etc.)
This category addresses the variety of specialty projects that are associated with a more
mature suburban community, such as maintenance, repair and replacement, and other
special funded or mandated programs, i.e., bus shelter pads, driveways, fences, parking
lots, retaining walls, noise walls, etc. It includes the pavement management of City owned
driveways and parking lots. ($0.85M)
UTILITIES
A. Water Trunk Distribution
The Finished Water Master Plan Update and Integrated Water Master Plan provide
guidance for this CIP, historically having anticipated development. This CIP identifies
various trunk water system improvements including the following more significant projects:
1. Lone Oak Road – Highway 13 to Pilot Knob Road (2025) – A trunk water main
replacement would be included with the proposed county highway upgrade. The existing
water pipe was installed in the late 1960’s. There is a high potential that pipe failure
would occur prior to a future road reconstruction, so coordination is appropriate. ($2.3M)
1. Diffley Road to Metcalf Dr - Water Main Installation (2026) – The connection of the
existing water mains north and south of the River Hills 9th Addition neighborhood would
provide a looping of the Eagan system west of Highway 77. Results in better fire
protection, water pressure and a disconnection from the Burnsville water system.
Schedule may be impacted by development. ($0.35M)
2. New Well #23 (2028) – A new well would be developed in the City’s south well field to
accommodate related recommendations in the Finished Water Master Plan Update
(2018). The Cliff Road Water Treatment Plant has capacity to accommodate it and it is
routinely placed in the last year of each CIP until the need is firmly established. ($1.2M)
B. Water Operations and Facilities
The CIP includes capital improvements for water supply, storage and treatment, as well as
the renewal and replacement of water system components. It contains the rotation of
preventative rehabilitation/repair of existing wells depending on the well’s usage and unique
aquifer attributes. It annually includes the Storz connection retrofits of fire hydrants adjacent
to street improvements at the request of the Fire Department at an average annual cost of
about $810,000. SCADA system and control upgrades and meter changeouts and
calibrations have become annual components of this program, as the City has aged.
Significant capital improvements include:
1. Safari Reservoir – Rehabilitation (2025) – A complete repaint of the reservoir is
scheduled based upon inspections that have identified needed repairs to be addressed
to assure continued infrastructure life and to maximize the coating protection. ($1.8M)
2. Yankee Reservoir – Rehabilitation (2027) – A complete repaint of the reservoir is
scheduled based upon inspections that have identified needed repairs to be addressed
to assure continued infrastructure life and to maximize the coating protection. ($1.9M)
C. Sanitary Sewer – Trunk Collection
The trunk sanitary sewer system is nearly complete with the exception of a few undeveloped
or underdeveloped areas.
10
1. Northeast District Sanitary Sewer Extension (District NE-5) (2024-26) – Evaluation of the
ongoing development of Viking Lakes will determine if three sewer trunk improvements
recommended in the AUAR and Sewer Master Plan for the upgrade of the trunk main
will be needed to accommodate the full build out of this development. ($2.0M each)
D. Sanitary Sewer – Operations and Facilities
The sanitary collection system includes 14 pumping stations and related force mains. The
CIP includes an annual program of relining approximately 2 miles of the older segments of
the system to structurally strengthen the pipe and seal out ground water infiltration. The
program provides Inflow & Infiltration mitigation benefits and annual lift station replacements
and rehabilitation.
1. Steeplechase Lift Station – Renewal (2025) – Scheduled renewal of pumps and control
panel including the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) at sanitary lift
station. Will improve station monitoring and reduce staff time requirements. ($0.43M)
2. Cloe Lane Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2026) – The complete rebuild of this lift station
will minimize the City’s liability due to station failures. The deteriorating condition of the
station components is making the station operation unreliable. It is critical that this
station operates effectively and reduce the potential risk of property damage. ($0.64M)
3. Marsh Cove Lift Station – Renewal (2028) – Scheduled renewal of pumps and control
panel including the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) at sanitary lift
station. Will improve station monitoring and reduce staff time requirements. ($0.53M)
E. Storm Sewer – Trunk Conveyance
This section is for the conveyance of excess surface water runoff and not for water quality
proposed improvements. There are typically minor improvements (< $100,000) included
which enhance flood protection as indicated in the Stormwater Master Plan Update. This
CIP has no annual allotments. Field data collection over the next 5-10 years will enable a
model update. Future CIPs may include improvements to address the City’s storm water
performance guidelines for the 1% storm event as indicated in an updated model.
F. Storm Sewer – Operations and Facilities
This CIP includes all aspects for the operation of the storm drainage system including 23
pumping stations and force mains. The CIP includes the installation of SCADA telemetry at
storm sewer lift stations, annual County highway storm sewer repairs, general pond
maintenance and storm sewer structure repairs.
1. Lexington Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2024) – The lift station was constructed in 1973,
upgraded in 1995. The complete rebuild of this station would improve overall operating
conditions and efficiency, while also enhance water quality improvements to the benefit
of LeMay Lake. The rebuild of the station with an updated design would reduce the
potential risk of property damage. ($0.79M)
2. Knox Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2025) – The lift station was constructed in 1988. It
has multiple mechanical issues, as well as an outdated design. The control hardware
also needs to be updated. It is proposed to rebuild the existing station to eliminate
operational deficiencies and reduce liabilities to private property. ($0.6M)
3. Woodlands Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2026) – The lift station was constructed in 1988.
It has a variety of issues including an outdated and undersized design, as well as
mechanical attrition and control hardware needing to be updated. It is proposed to
completely rebuild the existing station to enhance operational efficiencies and reduce the
potential risk of property damage. ($0.46M)
11
4. Thomas Lift Station – Renewal (2027) – Scheduled renewal of pumps and control panel
including the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) at sanitary lift station.
Will improve station monitoring and reduce staff time requirements. ($0.49M)
5. Oak Cliff Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2027) – The lift station was constructed in 1984. It
has a variety of issues related to the submersible design, including mechanical
degradation and outdated control hardware. A rebuild of the station would enhance
operational efficiencies and reduce the potential risk of property damage. ($0.69M)
6. Hurley Lake Lift Station – Rehabilitation (2028) – The lift station was constructed in 1983
and has reached its life expectancy. The proposed station rebuild would enhance
operational efficiencies and reduce liabilities to private property. ($0.81M)
G. Water Quality
The 2024-28 CIP represents the significant effort needed to recognize the public storm
sewer system requirements that address heightened water quality mandates. Substantial
improvements are proposed throughout the system to address the interconnectivity of
Eagan’s storm water system to the numerous lakes and other water bodies within the city.
The direct application of alum to individual water bodies will best address the reduction of
phosphorus levels in a number of the City’s prioritized lakes and ponds. ($5.1M)
SUMMARY
This extremely successful team effort continues to produce a high quality tool that provides the
City Council with the best opportunity to ensure that Eagan is a place where all can thrive. The
continuing success of the management of the public infrastructure, especially as it nears
replacement ages, is critical to the ongoing attainment of the high quality of life enjoyed in
Eagan. While this 5-Year CIP is a valuable tool, its greatest value is attained through its use
and advocacy by the City Council throughout the year. With the responsibility of nearly $1
billion of assets, its use is crucial for the Council.
Just when I thought it couldn’t get any better than it was last year, this group of dedicated
professionals, always striving to make improvements, resolved a lengthy processing step that
greatly simplified CIP production. A side benefit may become even more valuable in the future
evaluations of draft CIPs. The increased efficiency in combining data from multiple software
formats was a very significant enhancement this year. Previously, the production of the final CIP
reports required hours of data transfer by staff. Errors or omissions found beyond the final
“deadline” required a re-run of the multiple hour transfer or were not addressed. The analysis of
overall impacts by the revision of project years or cost estimates for individual improvements
would require a similar data transfer effort, so they were not attempted. Staff figured out how to
get the data from the various software to interact instantly, greatly reducing the time to produce
final reports and also allowing the results of a change in one software to immediately be seen in
all associated software spreadsheets as if it was all a part of the same spreadsheet. Wow!
This CIP was clearly a Team Eagan product created with the standard of excellence our
customers expect and deserve. I am grateful for the significant contributions from multiple
personnel from the Finance and Public Works Departments in the preparation of this important
management tool.
The 2024-2028 CIP is ready for your review. It is a combination of sensible and cost-effective
proposals for your evaluation. The additional financial attributes included in this year’s effort
should be useful for your full consideration. Staff will be ready to address your questions and
receive your feedback. I look forward to our discussion at the Council workshop on May 9.
12
Sincerely,
____________________________
Director of Public Works
Att: CIP Financing Plans and Pro-Formas (Exhibits 1, 2 & 3)
Enc: 5-Year CIP (2024-28) Link
C: Tim Plath, Deputy Director Jeff Brooker, Street Superintendent
John Gorder, City Engineer Jenna Olson, Water Resources Manager
Josh Feldman, Director of Finance Jon Eaton, Superintendent of Utilities
Alexandra O'Leary, Accountant Leah Sperduto, Public Works GIS Analyst
G:1 Public Works Admin/CIP/2024-2028/Executive/CIP Memo from Director
EXHIBIT 1
2023-2028
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
Cash Balance 14,524$ 16,165$ 15,737$ 13,980$ 13,504$ 10,884$
Add
Pro-Forma Receipts
Property Taxes - General 2,576 2,653 2,733 2,815 2,899 2,986 16,663
Property Taxes - Overpassess and Interchanges 590 474 474 - - - 1,538
Municipal State Aid Annual Allocations and Advance 6,616 3,248 3,248 3,248 3,248 3,248 22,856
MSA Bonding Needs 23 23 23 23 23 23 138
Receipts 9,805 6,398 6,478 6,086 6,170 6,257 41,195
Subtract
Pro-Forma Expenditures
Projects Under Construction (2023 and prior)7,902 - - - - - 7,902
Financing of 2024 - 2028 CIP 6,750 8,028 6,225 8,549 8,278 37,830
Improvements to the City owned properties 261 76 207 337 241 728 1,851
MSA Debt Service reimbursed by state -
Expenditures 8,163 6,826 8,235 6,562 8,790 9,006 47,583
Ending Fund Balance Pro-Forma 16,165$ 15,737$ 13,980$ 13,504$ 10,884$ 8,135$
City of Eagan
2024-2028 Major Street Pro-Forma
(in thousands of dollars)
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
EXHIBIT 2
Expenditures Existing
Projects 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL
Regional Projects 26,309,714$ 1,715,000$ 14,000,000$ -$ 5,300,000$ -$ 47,324,714$
Arterial & Collector 1,700,436 3,733,500 1,714,300 3,603,800 2,702,300 4,204,900 17,659,236
Local Streets 4,611,347 4,879,800 7,564,700 5,238,200 7,216,900 7,728,100 37,239,047
Trails 973,825 2,298,557 1,153,578 1,037,954 2,831,487 1,464,192 9,759,593
Sealcoat Maintenance 305,741 470,883 579,850 663,039 671,778 620,062 3,311,353
Intersection Improvements 1,493,494 2,101,000 1,812,000 - 250,000 430,000 6,086,494
Streetlighting - 645,460 53,371 54,972 554,888 58,320 1,367,011
Transportation - other - 173,314 126,017 244,626 119,864 183,146 846,967
Combined Utilities Trunk 3,915,586 270,000 3,950,000 400,000 1,950,000 1,260,000 11,745,586
Water: Oper. & Facilities 3,078,565 2,240,500 3,741,000 2,060,000 6,543,800 2,311,500 19,975,365
San: Oper. & Facilities 2,285,000 1,917,000 2,004,000 4,092,000 1,730,000 2,376,000 14,404,000
Storm: Oper. & Facilities 3,568,520 1,811,000 1,255,000 1,161,000 2,429,000 1,611,000 11,835,520
Water Quality - lakes, ponds and wetland improv 489,733 285,060 960,920 733,320 606,400 223,150 3,298,583
Ponds & Sediment Removal 164,297 545,700 968,350 381,600 21,000 399,000 2,479,947
MSA Debt Service Payments 243,000 238,000 228,000 218,000 208,000 198,000 1,333,000
CIP Bonds Debt Service Payments - - - 379,769 379,769 820,032 1,579,569
IT related cost 19,000 19,000
- - - - - - -
Total Expenditures 49,139,257$ 23,343,774$ 40,111,086$ 20,268,280$ 33,515,186$ 23,887,402$ 190,264,984$
Financing Sources
Major Street Fund 7,902,205$ 6,750,043$ 8,028,058$ 6,225,175$ 8,548,883$ 8,277,907$ 45,732,271$
Utility Enterprise Fund 12,323,699 8,585,367 9,897,864 9,326,838 8,476,081 9,129,556 56,159,835
Combined Utilities Trunk 1,640,034 270,000 50,000 400,000 - 1,200,000 3,560,034
Water Quality Fund 575,172 154,860 838,745 646,620 475,775 163,100 2,854,272
Subtotal 22,441,110 15,760,270 18,814,667 16,598,633 17,500,739 18,770,563 109,885,981
Special Assessments 2,610,921 4,131,180 2,457,410 2,901,950 2,749,490 3,963,490 18,814,441
State and/or County Participation and/or local 23,763,566 2,781,048 12,969,512 418,099 6,394,437 413,000 46,739,662
Federal and State Grants - 560,000 - - - - 560,000
Local agencies 50,000 22,500 - - 66,667 - 139,167
Improvements to City-owned property 261,160 76,276 206,997 337,098 241,353 727,849 1,850,733
Capital Improvement Bonds - - 5,650,000 - 6,550,000 - 12,200,000
Private 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 75,000
- - - - - - -
Financing Sources 49,139,257$ 23,343,774$ 40,111,086$ 20,268,280$ 33,515,186$ 23,887,402$ 190,264,984$
- - - - - - -
Capital Improvement Plan - SUMMARY
City of Eagan
2024-2028 Part III, Infrastructure
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
EXHIBIT 3
Major Street
Fund
9375
Combined
Utilities
Trunk Fund
9376
Utility
Enterprise
Fund
Operations
1115 (1)
Water
System R & R
Fund
1121
Sanitary
Sewer R & R
Fund
1122
Water Supply
& Storage
Fund
1123
Storm
Drainage
Expansion &
Modification
1125
Storm Drainage
Renewal &
Replacement
1126
Water
Quality
1127 Total
12/31/2022 Cash Balance 14,524$ 12,862$ 3,318$ (2)4,408$ 3,602$ 6,502$ 580$ 2,872$ 3,246$ 51,913$
2023-2028 User fees 41,195 6,858 - 10,605 29,896 - - 18,541 715 107,809
2024-2028 CIP bonds - - - 6,350 5,850 - - - - 12,200
Available Resources 55,718 19,720 3,318 21,363 39,348 6,502 580 21,412 3,961 171,922
Net Cost by Source
2023 (8,163) (1,640) (352) (3,148) (4,120) - (463) (4,241) (575) (22,702)
2024 (6,826) (270) (645) (2,441) (2,220) - - (3,261) (155) (15,818)
2025 (8,235) (50) (53) (4,437) (2,323) - (13) (3,071) (839) (19,022)
2026 (6,562) (400) (55) (2,176) (4,372) - - (2,345) (647) (16,556)
2027 (8,790) - (555) (2,056) (2,049) (40) (18) (3,378) (476) (17,362)
2028 (9,006) (1,200) (58) (2,412) (2,755) (50) - (3,035) (163) (18,678)
CIP bonds debt service (1,580) (1,580)
IT cost (19) (19) -
Total Cost by Source (47,583) (3,560) (3,318) (16,669) (17,837) (90) (495) (19,331) (2,854) (111,737)
12/31/2028 Balance 8,135 16,160 - 4,693 21,511 6,412 85 2,082 1,106 60,185
(1) Utility Fund cash reserved for Sanitary Sewer and Street Light operations and Utility repairs on Local Street improvements.
(2) Total fund cash as of 12/31/2022 is $21,806K, but only cash required to finance CIP is shown, operating revenues and expenditures are excluded.
(All Fund Summary)
2024-2028 Part III, Infrastructure
(in thousands of dollars)
City of Eagan
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
Funding Sources
Category Project Description Total CIP
County/State
Federal Private
(Non-City)
Property
Assessments
Major Street
Fund
Utility Enterprise
and Trunk Funds
Water Quality
Fund
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
Total City Cost
Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 3,733,500 - 1,878,740 1,378,460 476,300 - - 1,854,760
Regional Projects 1,715,000 1,417,500 - 197,500 100,000 - - 297,500
Intersection Improvements 2,101,000 1,156,000 - 945,000 - - - 945,000
Local Improvements 4,879,800 - 1,937,440 2,308,960 633,400 - - 2,942,360
Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.173,314 - - 94,007 79,307 - - 173,314
Seal Coat Maintenance 470,883 - - 470,883 - - - 470,883
Street Construction - - - - - - - -
Street Reconstruction - - - - - - - -
Trails 2,298,557 552,048 315,000 1,431,509 - - - 1,431,509
Intersection Lights - - - - - - - -
Subtotal 15,372,054 3,125,548 4,131,180 6,826,319 1,289,007 - - 8,115,326
Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 220,000 - - - 220,000 - - 220,000
Water Facilities & Operations 2,240,500 - - - 2,240,500 - - 2,240,500
Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 50,000 - - - 50,000 - - 50,000
Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 1,917,000 - - - 1,917,000 - - 1,917,000
Intersection Lights 645,460 - - - 645,460 - - 645,460
Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - -
Storm Facilities & Operations 1,811,000 - - - 1,811,000 - - 1,811,000
Subtotal 6,883,960 - - - 6,883,960 - - 6,883,960
Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 285,060 12,500 - - 117,700 154,860 - 272,560
Ponds & Sediment Removal 545,700 - - - 545,700 - - 545,700
TOTAL 23,086,774 3,138,048 4,131,180 6,826,319 8,836,367 154,860 - 15,817,546
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
City of Eagan
2024-2028
2024 GRAND SUMMARY
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
Funding Sources
Category Project Description Total CIP
County/State
Federal Private
(Non-City)
Property
Assessments
Major Street
Fund
Utility Enterprise
and Trunk Funds
Water Quality
Fund
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
Total City Cost
Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 1,714,300 - 444,930 1,047,670 221,700 - - 1,269,370
Regional Projects 14,000,000 11,000,000 - 700,000 2,300,000 - - 3,000,000
Intersection Improvements 1,812,000 1,426,000 - 386,000 - - - 386,000
Local Improvements 7,564,700 - 2,012,480 4,566,220 986,000 - - 5,552,220
Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.126,017 - - 117,249 8,768 - - 126,017
Seal Coat Maintenance 579,850 - - 579,850 - - - 579,850
Street Construction - - - - - - - -
Street Reconstruction - - - - - - - -
Trails 1,153,578 315,512 - 838,066 - - - 838,066
Intersection Lights - - - - - - - -
Subtotal 26,950,445 12,741,512 2,457,410 8,235,055 3,516,468 - - 11,751,523
Utilities Water Trunk Distribution - - - - - - - -
Water Facilities & Operations 3,741,000 - - - 1,991,000 - 1,750,000 1,991,000
Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 3,950,000 - - - 50,000 - 3,900,000 50,000
Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 2,004,000 - - - 2,004,000 - - 2,004,000
Intersection Lights 53,371 - - - 53,371 - - 53,371
Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - -
Storm Facilities & Operations 1,255,000 - - - 1,255,000 - - 1,255,000
Subtotal 11,003,371 - - - 5,353,371 - 5,650,000 5,353,371
Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 960,920 12,500 - - 109,675 838,745 - 948,420
Ponds & Sediment Removal 968,350 - - - 968,350 - - 968,350
TOTAL 39,883,086 12,754,012 2,457,410 8,235,055 9,947,864 838,745 5,650,000 19,021,664
City of Eagan
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2024-2028
2025 GRAND SUMMARY
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
Funding Sources
Category Project Description Total CIP
County/State
Federal Private
(Non-City)
Property
Assessments
Major Street
Fund
Utility Enterprise
and Trunk Funds
Water Quality
Fund
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
Total City Cost
Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 3,603,800 - 1,460,710 1,702,190 440,900 - - 2,143,090
Regional Projects - - - - - - - -
Intersection Improvements - - - - - - - -
Local Improvements 5,238,200 - 1,441,240 3,118,260 678,700 - - 3,796,960
Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.244,626 - - 240,929 3,697 - - 244,626
Seal Coat Maintenance 663,039 - - 663,039 - - - 663,039
Street Construction - - - - - - - -
Street Reconstruction - - - - - - - -
Trails 1,037,954 200,099 - 837,855 - - - 837,855
Intersection Lights - - - - - - - -
Subtotal 10,787,619 200,099 2,901,950 6,562,273 1,123,297 - - 7,685,570
Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 350,000 - - - 350,000 - - 350,000
Water Facilities & Operations 2,060,000 - - - 2,060,000 - - 2,060,000
Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 50,000 - - - 50,000 - - 50,000
Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 4,092,000 - - - 4,092,000 - - 4,092,000
Intersection Lights 54,972 - - - 54,972 - - 54,972
Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - -
Storm Facilities & Operations 1,161,000 - - - 1,161,000 - - 1,161,000
Subtotal 7,767,972 - - - 7,767,972 - - 7,767,972
Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 733,320 12,500 - - 74,200 646,620 - 720,820
Ponds & Sediment Removal 381,600 - - - 381,600 - - 381,600
TOTAL 19,670,511 212,599 2,901,950 6,562,273 9,347,069 646,620 - 16,555,962
City of Eagan
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2024-2028
2026 GRAND SUMMARY
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
Funding Sources
Category Project Description Total CIP
County/State
Federal Private
(Non-City)
Property
Assessments
Major Street
Fund
Utility Enterprise
and Trunk Funds
Water Quality
Fund
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
Total City Cost
Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 2,702,300 - 862,480 1,488,720 351,100 - - 1,839,820
Regional Projects 5,299,999 4,866,666 - 433,333 - - - 433,333
Intersection Improvements 250,000 250,000 - - - - - -
Local Improvements 7,216,900 - 1,887,010 4,406,390 923,500 - - 5,329,890
Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.119,864 - - 94,965 24,899 - - 119,864
Seal Coat Maintenance 671,778 - - 671,778 - - - 671,778
Street Construction - - - - - - - -
Street Reconstruction - - - - - - - -
Trails 2,831,487 1,136,437 - 1,695,050 - - - 1,695,050
Intersection Lights - - - - - - - -
Subtotal 19,092,328 6,253,103 2,749,490 8,790,236 1,299,499 - - 10,089,735
Utilities Water Trunk Distribution - - - - - - - -
Water Facilities & Operations 6,543,800 - - - 1,943,800 - 4,600,000 1,943,800
Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 1,950,000 - - - - - 1,950,000 -
Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 1,730,000 - - - 1,730,000 - - 1,730,000
Intersection Lights 554,888 - - - 554,888 - - 554,888
Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - -
Storm Facilities & Operations 2,429,000 - - - 2,429,000 - - 2,429,000
Subtotal 13,207,688 - - - 6,657,688 - 6,550,000 6,657,688
Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 606,400 12,500 - - 118,125 475,775 - 593,900
Ponds & Sediment Removal 21,000 - - - 21,000 - - 21,000
TOTAL 32,927,416 6,265,603 2,749,490 8,790,236 8,096,312 475,775 6,550,000 17,362,323
2024-2028
City of Eagan
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2027 GRAND SUMMARY
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
Funding Sources
Category Project Description Total CIP
County/State
Federal Private
(Non-City)
Property
Assessments
Major Street
Fund
Utility Enterprise
and Trunk Funds
Water Quality
Fund
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
Total City Cost
Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 4,204,900 - 1,641,530 2,018,670 544,700 - - 2,563,370
Regional Projects - - - - - - - -
Intersection Improvements 430,000 215,000 - 215,000 - - - 215,000
Local Improvements 7,728,100 - 2,261,960 4,509,240 956,900 - - 5,466,140
Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.183,146 - - 178,592 4,554 - - 183,146
Seal Coat Maintenance 620,062 - - 620,062 - - - 620,062
Street Construction - - - - - - - -
Street Reconstruction - - - - - - - -
Trails 1,464,192 - - 1,464,192 - - - 1,464,192
Intersection Lights - - - - - - - -
Subtotal 14,630,400 215,000 3,903,490 9,005,756 1,506,154 - - 10,511,910
Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 1,230,000 - 30,000 - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000
Water Facilities & Operations 2,311,500 - - - 2,311,500 - - 2,311,500
Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 30,000 - 30,000 - - - - -
Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 2,376,000 - - - 2,376,000 - - 2,376,000
Intersection Lights 58,320 - - - 58,320 - - 58,320
Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - -
Storm Facilities & Operations 1,611,000 - - - 1,611,000 - - 1,611,000
Subtotal 7,616,820 - 60,000 - 7,556,820 - - 7,556,820
Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 223,150 12,500 - - 152,250 58,400 - 210,650
Ponds & Sediment Removal 399,000 - - - 294,300 104,700 - 399,000
TOTAL 22,869,370 227,500 3,963,490 9,005,756 9,509,524 163,100 - 18,678,380
City of Eagan
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2024-2028
2028 GRAND SUMMARY
Cip Summary.xlsx 5/3/2023
ID Project Total CIP
Streets
22 PW: Streets
Transportation - other 173,314$
22-240019 Right of Way Maintenance 79,500$
22-240020 2024 Parking Lot and Utility Site Overlays 79,154$
22-240021 2024 Parking Lot and Utility Site Sealcoat 14,660$
Regional Projects 1,715,000$
22-240010 TH 3 Corridor Study 300,000$
22-240051 Cliff Road Overlay and Turn Lanes 100,000$
22-240052 Lexington Avenue Upgrade and Reconfiguration 680,000$
22-240053 Nicols Road Resurface/County Driveway Transition 635,000$
Arterial & Collector 3,733,500$
22-240001 Nicols Road A/C 658,200$
22-240002 Lone Oak Parkway A/C 424,900$
22-240003 Lone Oak Drive A/C 333,800$
22-240005 Vikings Parkway A/C 128,400$
22-240101 O'Neill Drive A/C 688,000$
22-240205 Blue Gentian Road A/C 282,800$
22-241306 Argenta Trail A/C 363,500$
22-241607 Federal Drive A/C 173,100$
22-243610 Red Pine Lane A/C 99,700$
22-243613 Dodd Road A/C 581,100$
Local Streets 4,879,800$
22-240102 Waters Annex 180,300$
22-240206 Grand Oak Five 122,000$
22-240207 Beverly Drive 114,500$
22-240801 Eagan/Sibley Terminal Industrial Park 610,500$
22-241006 Lemay Lake 251,900$
22-241008 Norwest Court 57,300$
22-241606 Bicentennial 172,900$
22-241610 Coachman Road 127,200$
22-241612 Terra Glen 440,400$
22-241707 Yankee Doodle Road / Yankee Place 408,000$
22-242709 Wilderness Park 2nd 577,800$
22-243004 River Hills 524,900$
22-243005 Nicols Road 140,000$
22-243007 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd & 4th 613,000$
22-243612 Sienna/Manley/Natures/Woodland/Piney/Finch 539,100$
Trails 2,298,557$
22-240150 2024 Transportation Trail Overlays 835,603$
22-240151 2024 Park and Access Trail Overlays 55,984$
22-240152 2024 Sidewalk Trip Hazard Removals 10,600$
22-240154 Slater Rd/Cinnamon Ridge Tr - Trail Construction 644,056$
22-240155 Nicols Road - Sidewalk Construction 384,314$
22-240156 Wilderness Run Road - Trail Improvements 53,000$
22-240157 Dodd Road - Trail Extension 315,000$
Sealcoat Maintenance 470,883$
22-240153 2024 Trail Sealcoat Maintenance 18,819$
22-240303 Eagandale Industrial Park SC 210,704$
22-240907 Central Parkway SC 50,319$
22-240908 Letendre Street SC 8,056$
22-240909 Quarry Road SC 11,277$
22-241201 Oakview Center/Holiday/Advantage Lane SC 21,677$
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2024
ID Project Total CIP
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2024
22-241403 Lakeside Court SC 1,582$
22-242102 Johnny Cake Ridge Road SC 19,703$
22-242106 Oakbrooke Addition SC 72,720$
22-242605 Canterbury Forest/Wedgewood 1st SC 52,000$
22-243614 Remington Court 4,026$
Intersection Improvements 2,101,000$
22-240032 CSAH 32 @ Slater Rd 1,305,000$
22-240165 CSAH 28 @ Mike Collins and Elrene 796,000$
Subtotal 15,372,054$
Utilities
63 PW: Street Lighting
Streetlighting 645,460$
63-240100 Replace Circuitry 58,300$
63-240200 Streetlight Replacement 31,800$
63-240300 Traffic Signal Painting 18,550$
63-240400 Streetlight Painting 40,810$
63-240500 LED Retrofit 496,000$
61 PW: Water
Water: Oper. & Facilities 2,240,500$
61-240001 Municipal Well Rehabilitation 193,000$
61-240002 SCADA and Controls Renewal 128,000$
61-240003 Meter Changeout Program 180,000$
61-240004 Meter Calibration Program 56,000$
61-240005 Reservoir Inspection and Cleaning 22,000$
61-240007 Well Electric System Rehabilitation 240,000$
61-240008 Storz Connection Program 750,500$
61-240009 Cross Connection Control Program 50,000$
61-240010 Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) Rehabilitation 161,000$
61-240011 Valve Adjustment Program (Eng)-$
61-240051 Surrey Heights Infrastructure Turnback Feasibility 60,000$
61-240060 Fume Hoods for Lab areas 20,000$
61-240061 Replace High Service Pumps (2 of 6)150,000$
Water 61-240062 220,000$
61-240050 Argenta Trail - Wescott Water Main 220,000$
62 PW: Sanitary
San: Oper. & Facilities 1,917,000$
62-240001 Sewer Lining for Root and I&I Control 599,000$
62-240004 Sewer Main Trunk Line Cleaning & Inspection 200,000$
62-240005 Sewer Main Trunk Line Maintenance & Repair 750,000$
62-240006 Manhole replacement program -$
62-240007 Manhole lining program 118,000$
62-240051 Zoo Metering Station Rehab 250,000$
San: Trunk Conveyance 50,000$
62-240050 District NE-5 (Lone Oak Drive) (phase 1)50,000$
64 PW: Storm
Storm: Oper. & Facilities 1,811,000$
64-240001 General Storm Infrastructure Maintenance 141,000$
64-240002 Lift Station Rehabilitation 787,000$
64-240003 Lift Station Renewal 402,000$
64-240004 County Road Storm Infrastructure Repairs 200,000$
64-240005 Neighborhood Revitalization - Storm Infra Repairs -$
64-240006 Storm system modifications based on model update 271,000$
64-240050 LP-31 inlet repair 10,000$
ID Project Total CIP
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2024
Storm: Trunk Conveyance -$
Subtotal 6,883,960$
Water Quality
65 PW: Water Quality
Water Quality - lakes, ponds and wetland improv 285,060$
65-240001 Water Quality Cost-Share Partnership Program -$
65-240002 Water Resources Infrastructure Maintenance -$
65-240006 Blackhawk Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240007 Lake JP-6 alum application -$
65-240008 East Thomas Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240009 Heine Pond alum application 8,560$
65-240011 Thomas Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240012 Carlson Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240013 Bur Oaks Pond protection project 16,050$
65-240014 Wetland LP-48 alum application 8,000$
65-240021 Iron-Sand Filtration Systems Maintenance 80,250$
Ponds & Sediment Removal 545,700$
65-240003 Pond JP-70 improvements 16,050$
65-240004 Wetland JP-20.1 improvements 16,050$
65-240005 Wetland LP-32.1 improvements 16,050$
65-240015 Wetland LP-39 improvements 16,050$
65-240016 Pond LP-22.2 improvements 15,000$
65-240017 Galaxie Avenue area pond improvements 21,400$
65-240018 Wetland BP-32 improvements 16,050$
65-240019 Ponds CP-7A, CP-7B improvements 15,000$
65-240020 Pond DP-3 improvements 20,000$
Subtotal 830,760$
Total 23,086,774$
0 2,000 4,000
Ft
City of Eagan2024 Capital Improvement Program - Public WorksStreet Improvements, Utility Improvements,Water Quality Improvements
Prepared By: Eagan Public Works Dept.Updated: 5/2/2023Document Path:L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\CIP\NextYearProjects.mxd
Intersection Improvement
Parking Lot Improvement
Streets - Utility Site Improvement
Sanitary Facility/Operation Improvement
Storm Facility/Operation Improvement
Water Facility/Operation Improvement
Storm Trunk Improvement
Water Trunk Improvement
Sanitary Trunk Improvement Collector - New
Local - New/Recon
Collector - Recycle
Local - Recycle
Collector - Resurface
Local - Resurface
Collector - Overlay
Local - Overlay
Collector - Sealcoat
Local - Sealcoat
Trail - New/Recon
Trail - Overlay
Water - Facility/Op. Impr.
Water Trunk - New/Impr/Replace
Sanitary Trunk - New/Impr/Replace
Storm Trunk - New/Impr/Replace
Sanitary - Lining
Water Quality Improvement
Streetlight Improvement
Regional Projects
Trail - Sealcoat
Signal Improvement
Water Trunk Improvement
Sanitary - Facility/Op. Imprv.
Crossing Improvement
ID Project Total CIP
Streets
22 PW: Streets
Transportation - other 126,017$
22-240019 Right of Way Maintenance 79,500$
22-250020 2025 Parking Lot and Utility Site Overlays 8,768$
22-250021 2025 Parking Lot and Utility Site Sealcoat 32,979$
Regional Projects 14,000,000$
22-250051 Lone Oak Road Upgrade and Reconfiguration 14,000,000$
Arterial & Collector 1,714,300$
22-250002 Denmark Avenue A/C 316,100$
22-250003 Covington Lane A/C 464,500$
22-250004 Deerwood Drive A/C 259,300$
22-250005 Daniel Drive A/C 236,000$
22-252610 Lexington Pointe Parkway A/C 438,400$
Local Streets 7,564,700$
22-251205 Harvey 1 & 2/Burview Acres/55 Frontage/Cherrywood 1,119,800$
22-251509 Golfview Drive 187,600$
22-251802 Cedar Industrial 192,600$
22-252204 Birch Park / Windcrest 453,400$
22-252503 Sunset/Northview Meadows/Overview/Saddlehorn 1,960,500$
22-252505 Lakeside Estates 361,900$
22-252608 Patrick Road 35,000$
22-253010 Erin Drive/Erin Lane 809,100$
22-253112 Slater Acres / Whispering Woods 1st-2nd 372,700$
22-253205 Ridgecliffe 1st/Berkshire Ponds/Parkridge/Safari 2,072,100$
Trails 1,153,578$
22-250150 2025 Transportation Trail Overlays 363,490$
22-250151 2025 Park and Access Trail Overlays 174,018$
22-250152 2025 Sidewalk Trip Hazard Removals 11,236$
22-250154 Daniel Drive/Trenton Trail - Trail Construction 94,045$
22-250155 Golden Meadow Road - Sidewalk Construction 510,789$
Sealcoat Maintenance 579,850$
22-250153 2025 Trail Sealcoat Maintenance 28,895$
22-251510 Duckwood Drive/Denmark Avenue/Town Centre Drive SC 111,679$
22-251710 Forest View SC 2,774$
22-252008 Alder Lane SC 1,613$
22-252009 Silver Bell Road/Cedar Grove Parkway SC 76,141$
22-252105 Deerwood Drive SC 66,771$
22-252203 Wescott Road SC 23,829$
22-252405 Haven Woods Court SC 3,316$
22-252406 Perron Acres/Oak Bluffs SC 11,609$
22-252409 Dodd Road SC 43,706$
22-252708 Ches Mar 1st - 4th SC 46,684$
22-252810 Thomas Center Drive SC 11,944$
22-253206 Galaxie Avenue SC 22,829$
22-253305 Brittany 1 - 6 Additions SC 53,416$
22-253307 Beacon Hill SC 45,363$
22-253403 Park Cliff 1 - 3 Additions SC 29,281$
Intersection Improvements 1,812,000$
22-250144 TH 3 @ Red Pine Lane 183,000$
22-250145 TH 13 @ Blackhawk Road 133,000$
22-250146 TH 13 @ Yankee Doodle Road 131,000$
22-250147 TH 149 @ Argenta Trail/Wescott Road 262,000$
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2025
ID Project Total CIP
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2025
22-250148 TH 149 @ Yankee Doodle Road 117,000$
22-250149 TH 149 @ Opperman Road 143,000$
22-253200 CSAH 32 @ Beacon Hill and Thomas Center Dr 843,000$
Subtotal 26,950,445$
Utilities
63 PW: Street Lighting
Streetlighting 53,371$
63-240200 Streetlight Replacement 31,800$
63-240300 Traffic Signal Painting 18,550$
61 PW: Water
Water: Oper. & Facilities 3,741,000$
61-250001 Municipal Well Rehabilitation 276,000$
61-250002 SCADA and Controls Renewal 137,000$
61-250003 Meter Changeout Program 193,000$
61-250004 Meter Calibration Program 60,000$
61-250005 Reservoir Inspection and Cleaning 24,000$
61-250006 Reservoir Rehabilitation - Safari 1,800,000$
61-250007 Well Electric System Rehabilitation 171,000$
61-250008 Storz Connection Program 676,000$
61-250009 Cross Connection Control Program 50,000$
61-250010 Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) Rehabilitation 54,000$
61-250011 Valve Adjustment Program (Eng)-$
61-250050 Valve Replacement on 24" main line from Safari Res 50,000$
61-250060 Rehabilitate STP Filter Center Columns 250,000$
Water: Trunk Distribution -$
61-250051 Lone Oak Road (Hwy 13 to PKR)-$
62 PW: Sanitary
San: Oper. & Facilities 2,004,000$
62-250001 Sewer Lining for Root and I&I Control 734,000$
62-250003 Lift Station Renewal 430,000$
62-250004 Sewer Main Trunk Line Cleaning & Inspection 214,000$
62-250005 Sewer Main Trunk Line Maintenance & Repair 500,000$
62-250006 Manhole replacement program -$
62-250007 Manhole lining program 126,000$
San: Trunk Conveyance 3,950,000$
62-240050 District NE-5 (Lone Oak Drive) (phase 1)50,000$
62-250050 District NE-5 (Lone Oak Drive) (phase 2)2,000,000$
64 PW: Sto 62-250051
Storm: Oper. & Facilities 1,255,000$
64-250001 General Storm Infrastructure Maintenance 151,000$
64-250002 Lift Station Rehabilitation 600,000$
64-250004 County Road Storm Infrastructure Repairs 214,000$
64-250005 Neighborhood Revitalization - Storm Infra Repairs -$
64-250006 Storm system modifications based on model update 290,000$
Storm: Trunk Conveyance -$
Subtotal 11,003,371$
Water Quality
65 PW: Water Quality
Water Quality - lakes, ponds and wetland improv 960,920$
65-240001 Water Quality Cost-Share Partnership Program -$
65-240002 Water Resources Infrastructure Maintenance -$
65-240006 Blackhawk Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240007 Lake JP-6 alum application -$
ID Project Total CIP
City of Eagan
Public Works Department Part III CIP
2025
65-240008 East Thomas Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240009 Heine Pond alum application 8,560$
65-240011 Thomas Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240012 Carlson Lake alum application 8,560$
65-240013 Bur Oaks Pond protection project 16,050$
65-240021 Iron-Sand Filtration Systems Maintenance 80,250$
65-250003 Cliff Lake alum application 8,560$
65-250004 Holz Lake alum application 8,560$
65-250010 Carlson Lake SW Vault Maintenance 53,500$
65-250011 Goat Hill Park WQ improvements 250,000$
Ponds & Sediment Removal 968,350$
65-240003 Pond JP-70 improvements 16,050$
65-240004 Wetland JP-20.1 improvements 16,050$
65-240005 Wetland LP-32.1 improvements 16,050$
65-240015 Wetland LP-39 improvements 16,050$
65-240017 Galaxie Avenue area pond improvements 21,400$
65-240018 Wetland BP-32 improvements 16,050$
65-250001 Wetland BLP-5.1 improvements 15,000$
65-250002 Wetlands JP-13, JP-13.1, JP-65 improvements 26,750$
65-250005 Thomas Lake Heights area pond improvements 21,400$
65-250006 Wetland BP-12 improvements 21,400$
Subtotal 1,929,270$
Total 39,883,086$
0 2,000 4,000
Ft
City of Eagan2025 Capital Improvement Program - Public WorksStreet Improvements, Utility Improvements,Water Quality Improvements
Prepared By: Eagan Public Works Dept.Updated: 5/2/2023Document Path:L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\CIP\SecondYearProjects.mxd
Intersection Improvement
Parking Lot Improvement
Streets - Utility Site Improvement
Sanitary Facility/Operation Improvement
Storm Facility/Operation Improvement
Water Facility/Operation Improvement
Storm Trunk Improvement
Water Trunk Improvement
Sanitary Trunk Improvement
Collector - New
Local - New/Recon
Collector - Recycle
Local - Recycle
Collector - Resurface
Local - Resurface
Collector - Overlay
Local - Overlay
Collector - Sealcoat
Local - Sealcoat
Trail - New/Recon
Trail - Overlay
Water - Facility/Op. Improvement
Water Trunk - New/Impr/Replace
Sanitary Trunk - New/Impr/Replace
Storm Trunk - New
Sanitary - Lining
Water Quality Improvement
Streetlight Improvement
Regional Project
Trail - Sealcoat
Signal Improvement
Sanitary - Facility/Op. Improvement
Public Works
Capital Improvement Plan
May 9, 2023 City Council Workshop
2024 -2028
•Uncertainty Ahead
•Decreased Fund
Balances
•Enhanced Evaluation
Uncertainty Ahead
•Anticipated yearly cost increases –multiple factors make estimates challenging
•Lack of experienced construction personnel
•Reduced material quantities
•Supply chain delays
•Higher material costs
•Lack of timely utility locations
•Redevelopment
•Up front and ongoing costs for new infrastructure
•May increase or decrease revenue
Decreased Fund Balances
•The Major Street Fund continues to
be depleted over time
•Utility rate increases to offset fund
decreases
•Future analysis of water demand and
revenue structure may be required
•Capital Improvement Bonding
Capital Improvement
Bonding
•Recommended by the
Utility Rate Study in
2021
•Earmarked for
specific Utility
projects
•Planned for 2025 and
2027
•Requires debt service
TINA & INA
•The Transportation Infrastructure Needs
Analysis (TINA) and the Infrastructure
Needs Analysis (INA) are both focused on
future planning
•Updated efforts focused on comprehensive
asset management are currently underway
•Guidance for upcoming CIPs
•Original infrastructure installation was
completed using contributed capital from
the initial development of Eagan. The City
will be responsible for funding future
replacements of this donated infrastructure
$141.1 Mil
CIP Total
$89.0 Mil
($17.8 Mil
per year)
City
$52.7 Mil
Non-City
$21.0 Mil
Regional
Data From Exhibit 2, 2024-2028 CIP
Data From Exhibit 1, 2024-2028 CIP
2023
$14.5 Mil
2028
$8.1 Mil
Major Street
Fund
Contributions
$41.2 Mil Major Street
Fund
Obligations $47.6
Mil
Downward trend
expected to
continue without
revenue increases
Data From Exhibit 1, 2024-2028 CIP
2023
$37.4 Mil
2028
$52.1 Mil
Total Utility
Funds
Obligations
$64.2 Mil
Total Utility
Funds
Contributions
$66.6 Mil
Bonding and Utility
Rate Increases result in
positive cash balances
to be used for future
Utilities improvements
Capital
Improvement
Bonds
$12.2 Mil
Regional Transportation
Street Improvements
Trail Improvements
Signal & Intersection Improvements
Utility Improvements
Water Quality Improvements
Closing
•Thanks to Staff
•Thanks to Council
•Schedule
•Revisions
•June 6 Formal Approval
•Public Posting
•Questions/Comments
Lexington Avenue
Diffley Road to Wescott Road2024
Lone Oak Road Upgrade
Highway 13 to Pilot Knob Road2025
Cliff Road/Highway 3
Intersection Improvements2027
Argenta Trail/I-494
Interchange Study2027
Dodd Road Trail Extension
Red Pine Lane to Parkside Circle2024
Slater Road/Cinnamon Ridge Trail
Cinnamon Ridge Par to Cliff Road2024
Nicols Road Sidewalk
Erin Drive (South) to Cliff Road2024
Daniel Drive/Trenton Trail
Diffley Road to Trenton Trail2025
Golden Meadow Road Sidewalk
Daniel Drive to Dodd Road2025
Blackhawk Road/Highline Trail
Crossing Enhancement2026
Mike Collins Drive Sidewalk/Trail
Yankee Doodle Road to Borchert Lane2027
Cliff Road @ Slater Road
Signal Replacement2024
Yankee Doodle Rd @ Mike Collins Dr & Elrene Rd
Signal Installation & Intersection Reconfiguration2024
Cliff Rd @ Beacon Hill Rd/Thomas Center Dr/
Thomas Lake Rd
Signal Replacement & Possible Relocation2025
Highway 55 @ Blue Water Road
Intersection Reconfiguration2027
Pilot Knob Road @ Wescott Rd/
Kingswood Ponds Rd
Signal Replacement2028
Cedar Grove Area
LED Retrofit2024
Lone Oak Road
Highway 13 to Pilot Knob Road Water Main Replacement2025
Diffley Road to Metcalf Drive
Water Main Installation2026
New Well # 23
South Well Field2028
Safari Reservoir
Rehabilitation2025
Yankee Reservoir
Rehabilitation2027
Northeast Eagan
Sanitary Sewer Extension2024-26
Steeplechase Lift Station
Renewal2025
March Cove Lift Station
Renewal2028
Lexington Lift Station
Rehabilitation2024
Knox Lift Station
Rehabilitation2025
Woodlands Lift Station
Rehabilitation2026
Oak Cliff Lift Station
Rehabilitation2027
Hurley Lake Lift Station
Rehabilitation2028
Agenda Information Memo
May 9, 2023 City Council Meeting
VI. Redevelopment Update
Action to be Considered:
No formal action needed. This item is to receive an update on redevelopment efforts from staff and
the Finance Committee.
Facts:
➢ Staff and the Finance Committee will provide an update on redevelopment efforts in the
community.
Attachments:
None