The URL can be used to link to this page

10/10/2023 - City Council Special SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 10, 2023 5:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS – EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER AGENDA I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD III. NORTHWEST CENTRAL COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN IV. ARPA BUDGET UPDATE V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Information Memo October 10, 2023, Special City Council Workshop III. Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan Direction for Consideration: Provide direction to staff regarding the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan Background  The Delta, Unisys, and Argosy sites are located within the Central Commons Special Area, one of four special areas created within the Eagan Comprehensive Plan to allow more focused planning efforts in areas where land use changes are likely.  The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes Guiding Principles for the Central Commons Special Area Plan (attached) which “[n]o matter the type of development occurring in the Central Commons Area. . .shall be considered in future land use decisions.”  The three sites (the “Project Area”) are adjacent to Central Park and the Eagan Community Center and contain vacant or underused office/corporate campus facilities.  The Finance Committee met on March 30, 2022 and determined that the City had a strong interest in guiding development in the Project Area due to its high visibility in the community, the location within the Central Commons Special Area, and the adjacency to one of the City’s largest investments at Central Park and the Eagan Community Center. The Finance Committee directed staff to draft a request for proposals (RFP) for a small area plan.  The City Council approved a request for proposals for the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan on August 16, 2022 and approved a Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for the small area plan (the “Plan”) on December 6, 2022.  At the February 14, 2023, City Council work session meeting, the consultant provided an update on initial progress, and the City Council provided direction on policy questions.  At the June 13, 2023, City Council work session meeting, the City Council provided feedback on three concept plans and directed staff to proceed with the second phase of public engagement.  Since the June work session meeting, work on the Plan has included: o Meetings with representatives of property owners. o The second phase of public engagement. o Preparation of a draft preferred plan incorporating City Council and public feedback.  Andrew Dresdner (Project Manager) and Mike Thompson (Planner) will attend the October 10, 2023, City Council work session on behalf of the consultant. The consultant will present the draft preferred plan to the City Council and ask for feedback. Public Engagement  The City’s engagement strategy included a plan that provided opportunities to engage with a diversity of voices throughout the broader community in the multiple phases of the small area plan process through outreach, communication, in-person and digital engagement, and public education.  The first phase of public engagement included information and engagement opportunities through print, digital, in-person, and social media outreach, including a community survey which received 542 responses, two pop-up events at the Eagan Community Center, and an event with 132 fourth and fifth graders at Pilot Knob Stem Elementary School.  The second phase of public engagement included information and engagement opportunities through print, digital, in-person, and social medial outreach, including a community survey which received 743 responses, two well-attended pop-up events at Market Fest, and meetings with property owners and ISD 197.  Public feedback on the concept plans reflected community concerns about development and anxiety about change within neighborhoods and a beloved City park. o Respondents expressed skepticism about the viability of a corporate campus, concerns about the City’s existing vacant retail space, and opposition to new housing particularly affordable and high-density housing. o Community members voiced strong opposition to road connections to existing neighborhoods citing concerns for increased traffic and decreased public safety. o Many respondents shared their appreciation of large community events held at Central Park and expressed concerns over the loss of event parking on private property.  Public feedback also reflected the community’s hopes and vision. o Respondents expressed a desire for new retail, restaurants, and services particularly in walkable environments. o A few respondents expressed support for additional housing options, especially affordable housing and senior housing, a desire to welcome new neighbors to the community, and a hope to stay in Eagan as their housing preferences changed. o Respondents expressed very strong support for park expansion and improvements, preservation of the bluff, and protection of the natural environment.  Generally, the concept that was most favored was A Park Runs Through It due to the expansion of Central Park, expansion of Pilot Knob Park, and preservation of the bluff.  Staff and consultants have met with private property owners and their representatives. o Both the Delta and Unisys site are currently being marketed for sale and redevelopment. The former Delta building is currently vacant. Unisys plans to fully vacate its building within the next few years. o The property owners have expressed their desire to sell their properties in the short-term for redevelopment into high-demand uses such as high-density residential and flex commercial/industrial space. o The property owners’ representatives have requested that the City define specific uses that would not be appropriate for the redevelopment area.  Staff met with representatives from ISD 197 including Superintendent Olson-Skog. o The school district is supportive of improved trail access to Central Park as that is a popular destination for classroom outings. o The school district is supportive of new housing being connected to the school via trail networks. o The school district requested to be kept informed on development phasing for types and numbers of new residential units so that they can make plans for increased enrollment. Influencing Factors In addition to stakeholder feedback, several technical factors influenced the draft preferred plan. Flex Space  The property owners’ representatives have indicated a desire for flex commercial/industrial space.  Flex space offers flexibility for building owners and tenants that have changing needs for office, manufacturing, and warehouse space.  The property owner has suggested that flex space would have a maximum of 30% office and clear heights of 18 to 20 feet.  New flex and light industrial buildings typically have clear height of 24 to 28 feet. The building layout is a long, rectangular building with one elevation having docks doors and a truck court.  Flex buildings typically deliver approximately 8-10 jobs per acre.  As flex tenants change, City staff have observed a trend for requests for lesser percentages of office use, more dock doors, and more outdoor storage of fleet vehicles, tanks, and equipment.  Due to the low finish levels of interior spaces and the low overall square footage per acre (due to single story construction and truck bays), light industrial uses contribute the lowest amount of City tax revenue per acre compared to other uses.  Flex uses as described above do not appear to meet the approved Guiding Principles for the Central Commons Special Area Plan included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.  City staff and consultants have concluded that flex space may be more appropriate for other locations within Eagan. Park Dedication  New development pays park dedication fees to support expansion and capital improvements to the City’s park system.  Park dedication rates differ for residential and commercial properties. Residential properties pay park dedication on a per unit basis. Commercial and industrial properties pay on a square foot basis.  Based on current rates, a 100,000 square foot flex building would contribute $29,800 towards park dedication. A 70,000 square foot office building would contribute $76,930, and a 160-unit apartment building would contribute $637,920. In sum, on a per acre basis assuming typical floor area ratios per development type, o Flex Buildings contribute $2,600 / acre o Commercial Buildings contribute $19,000 / acre o Apartment Buildings contribute $122,000 / acre  When development makes land instead of cash dedications, the value of land to be dedicated must equal what cash dedication would have been. Hydrology  The Delta and Unisys sites are out of compliance with current local and regional stormwater and water management regulations due to their development pre- regulation, the overall amount of impervious surface, and lack of water quality and quantity infrastructure.  The Delta and Unisys sites are within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) due to the proximity of raw water distribution lines which run along the north and western boundaries. This means that stormwater infiltration facilities should be placed off-site.  The park, and the space between Delta and Unisys create a ravine in which water naturally collects and flows. Today, that ravine has wetlands, meadow, and open water.  The draft preferred plan contemplates meeting stormwater and water management requirements through a system that improves sustainability and enhances public open space. Draft Preferred Plan  The draft preferred plan balances the needs and desires expressed by stakeholders including the City Council, community members, and property owners.  The draft preferred plan meets the approved Guiding Principles for the Central Commons Special Area Plan including: o Support dense, mixed-use development with a range of retail, office services, medium/high-density residential, employment and public space uses. o Design the development to ensure cohesiveness with neighboring uses and enhance pedestrian connections. o Respect existing site conditions and natural features – design with natural systems in mind. o Strive for pedestrian-scale buildings that are two to four stories in height. Create identify through the design character of the edges, i.e, the streetscape, building placement and gateway signage. o Develop public gathering spaces or smaller, linked amenity areas (public or privately owned). o Create an integrated transportation system that organizes pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular and transit movements. Use streetscape enhancements to create an identifying character for the Central Area. Next Steps  Following the October work session, staff and consultants will reflect on Council feedback, make any necessary revisions, and prepare final plan documents to be presented to the City Council in winter 2024. Staff will also provide informational updates to committees and commissions.  For the next work session meeting, staff and consultants will present potential strategies for implementation. Policy Questions 1. Do you support the idea of expanding the park so it is more connected and active? 2. Do you support meeting development stormwater needs in a manner that enhances public open space? 3. Do you support a land use vision for the Unisys and Delta sites that delivers park compatible uses that are relatively mixed, compact, and walkable? Attachments (6): III-1 Memo, Bolton & Menk-Eagan Council Work Session, October 2023 III-2 Presentation, Background and Public Engagement, October 2023 III-3 Presentation, Bolton & Menk-Eagan Council Work Session, October 2023 III-4 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Central Commons Special Area Plan Guiding Principles III-5 Public comments received since June 13, 2023 work session III-6 Polco survey results – summer 2023 Northwest Commons Small Area Plan Delta / Unisys/former Argosy University Sites City of Eagan, MN Council Worksession October 2023 2June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 2 A B C A B C Delta Delta Central Park Central ParkCentral Park Quarry Quarry ParkPark Unisys Unisys Argosy Argosy PI L O T K N O B R D TOWERVIEW ROAD LONE OAK RD YANKEE DOODLE RD Study Area Pilot Knob Pilot Knob ParkPark 3June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 3 Small Area Plan Process: This work session marks the middle of the ﬁ nal phase of the Small Area Plan. To date, we have conducted back- ground research, site analysis, market analysis, public engagement, and exploraƟ on of alternaƟ ves. We have explored three broad approaches and sought extensive public feedback on these approaches. The purpose of this work session is to share with you re- sults of the public engagement and a draŌ plan that seeks to ﬁ nd the current balance between market demands and community needs, as well as balance between public reve- nues and public expenditures. Following this work session we will make revisions, as nec- essary, conduct addiƟ onal technical analysis, and establish an implementaƟ on strategy. In the winter, we anƟ cipate coming back to you with a ﬁ nal plan. Small Area Plan Purpose: The redevelopment of three large sites surrounding the City’s marquee park and Community Center is a generaƟ onal opportunity for Eagan to redirect the future of a large porƟ on of the City and to accomplish broad public goals that would otherwise be unachievable. Each of the three sites could redevelop independently, under current zoning and without public involvement. However, doing so would likely happen very slowly, and without signiﬁ cant public beneﬁ ts. Piecemeal develop- ment could also limit future opportuniƟ es to maximize private investment. The purpose of the Small Area Plan is to coordinate the redevelopment of the sites with each other, with the surrounding context, and with future public investments. By doing so, a Small Area Plan can help the City achieve important and highly valued public outcomes. Background Project Goal: To create a land use vision that maximizes beneﬁ ts for Eagan, leverages the City’s marquee park, and creates a posiƟ ve ripple eff ect throughout the surrounding area. Overall Principles : • Balance the demands for public services with the ability to develop revenues from private development. • A Vision that is market driven and off ers long term stability. • Public investment that is driven by and supported by the land use vision. Public Outcomes: Through public/private coordinaƟ on the Northwest Central Commons Area will deliver the following broadly shared public outcomes: • Growth of city tax revenue and high land producƟ vity. • A more acƟ ve and beƩ er-connected park for more users throughout the day, week, and year. • Housing opƟ ons/choices for exisƟ ng and new Eagan residents. • PreservaƟ on (and enhancement) of exisƟ ng area ecology, tree canopy, hydrology, and topography. • Land uses that are complementary to the park and to each other. • Land uses and paƩ erns that are “transit ready.” • Complete neighborhoods that encourage walking and biking and reduce traffi c congesƟ on. • The creaƟ on of well-paying jobs. 4June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 4 Primary Features and Strengths of the Site • A park and community center located in the center of the community • Within walking distance of retail and services • Well located along an arterial roadway • Natural AmeniƟ es – slope, wetlands, legacy oaks • Developable land – largely ﬂ at and served with uƟ liƟ es Primary OpportuniƟ es • Land uses that are more conducive to the surrounding area and have a beƩ er relaƟ onship with Central Park. • Improve access to both Delta, Unisys and park properƟ es with a public roadway »Improve marketability/valuaƟ on of Delta site »Improve accessibility to north half of park property • Improve the relaƟ onship of Central Park to surrounding properƟ es with complementary land uses that help acƟ vate the park. • Create views and vistas across the park and from the bluff • Re-imagine park space relaƟ ng to large community events »ReposiƟ oning rugby ﬁ elds for more useable/accessible space »ConnecƟ ve trail opportuniƟ es in each direcƟ on • Improve the site’s hydrology, reconnect natural systems, preserve its assets Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Central Park 5June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 5 Refresher on Three Preliminary Alternatives CO N C E P T 1 Jo b s o n t h e P a r k Key Elements: • Park boundary and programming unchanged • Jobs and commercial uses are primary uses. • Large single-tenant corporate campus. • Vehicular access layout largely unchanged. • Trail-only connection between parks. • Bluff is preserved under private ownership. CO N C E P T 2 Ce n t r a l P a r k V i l l a g e Key Elements: • Developed Bluff • Highest range of residential densities / choices • Limited mixed-use development • Relocated rugby ﬁ elds • Structured public parking adjacent to community center CO N C E P T 3 A P a r k R u n s T h r o u g h i t Key Elements: • Rugby ﬁ elds relocated to Pilot Knob Park. • Bluff is preserved through public ownership. • Expanded housing options. • Park sale / acquisition. • Additional park programming / activities. 6June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 6 Update and Summary of Public Engagement Following the June Worksession with Council, the three preliminary alternaƟ ves were veƩ ed publicly. Public en- gagement acƟ viƟ es included: Pop up meeƟ ngs at two Market Fests in June and July. A widely distributed survey through City channels that yielded over 700 responses. Public Engagement Which Goals are Most Important to you? Select your top THREE goals A more acƟ ve and beƩ er connected park 72% A focus on walking and biking 69% Sustainable and focused on environment 67% CreaƟ on of Well Paying jobs 24% Growth in the City tax revenue 23% Housing choices for new & exisƟ ng residents 21% Which of the following consideraƟ ons are most important to you. Select your top THREE OpƟ mizing the Park 79% Uses 51% ConnecƟ ons 41% Jobs 37% Parking 20% Housing 19% Roads 13% 7June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 7 Public Engagement Rank the three concepts from 1 (favorite) to 3 (least favorite) 123 Concept 1: Jobs on the Park 27% 26% 48% Concept 2: Central Park Village 11% 43% 46% Concept 3: A Park Runs Through It 59% 29% 12% Rank how much you like the features of A Park Runs Through It Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Do Not Like Strongly Do Not Like Having a smaller amount of offi ce and retail on the site 30% 38% 18% 13% Having a lot of housing on the site 10% 13% 21% 56% The bluff is developed 7% 18% 22% 53% The park shape does not change 25% 44% 23% 7% The rugby ﬁ elds switch locaƟ ons with the road in the park 7% 47% 29% 17% Public EngagementPublic EngagementPublic Engagement 8June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 8 Land Use Strategy The Plan considers a variety of land uses that are both complementary to each other and, just as important, com- plementary and compaƟ ble with the park. The redevelop- ment sites have a strong presence on both Pilot Knob Road as well as the park, and the distribuƟ on of land uses seeks to take advantage of those qualiƟ es. Given the site’s locaƟ on and the prevailing demand for housing in Eagan, it is likely that the enƟ rety of the two sites could be absorbed with housing within 10-15 years. However, the Plan recommends a more paƟ ent and delib- erate approach to create a cohesive district that delivers a wide range of public beneﬁ ts. The Plan presents a future that is more walkable, more connected, more environ- mentally responsive, and more integrated with natural resources and the park than “standard” quickly absorbed residenƟ al development. Speciﬁ cally, the Plan locates most non-residenƟ al uses (+/- 400,000 square feet) along Pilot Knob Road where they can take advantage of regional access to minimize impacts to exisƟ ng neighborhoods. The Plan proposes a cluster of 3-story offi ce/clinic buildings on the Unisys Site, along Pilot Knob Road, that deliver high-quality jobs and services to the community – as well as a potenƟ al off -peak parking supply for large events at the park. Whereas job predicƟ ons are very hard to make, using Met Council cal- culaƟ ons, it is reasonable to project 400,000 square feet of offi ce or clinic space to deliver approximately 500 jobs. The land use plan proposes a series of restaurants or other uses that help acƟ vate the park, on the Unisys site, along the top of the bluff . These uses should take advantage of their park-like seƫ ng as well as their proximity to new offi ce/clinic buildings, park users, and new and exisƟ ng neighbors. The Delta Site is proposed to be two neighborhoods, one on the north side of the public road and another on the south side adjacent to the park. The north neighborhood (approx. 12 acres) will contain fewer units (than the south neighborhood) so as to be compaƟ ble with the exisƟ ng neighborhoods. The exisƟ ng tree lined buff er should be preserved. The south porƟ on of Delta, adjacent to the Park will con- tain units in townhouses, small apartments and mulƟ -story apartments. The tallest buildings (up to ﬁ ve stories) would be located along the new public road. Lower, three-story buildings (walk up units) should be located along the park. Both neighborhoods would have internal greenspace and would be well connected to Central Park. Overall Strategy IllustraƟ ve Plan Land Use Plan Housing Housing Offi ce, Clinic, Employment Offi ce, Clinic, Employment Housing Park SupporƟ ng Use Park SupporƟ ng Use Park SupporƟ ng Use P a r k S u p p o r Ɵ n g U s e DELTA UNISYS 9June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 9 Park Strategy Central Park is the City’s premier community park and gathering place. It was purchased and established by the City as a community gathering space for events such as Fun Fest, Market Fest and others. Over the years the City has invested in features, ameniƟ es, and programs to secure the park as a marquee public space - diff erent in funcƟ on and purpose from neighborhood parks and regional parks. It has an approximately 385-car parking lot adjacent to the ECC. Despite the park’s generous size, amount of parking and endearment to the community, it can be improved as a community asset. This Plan provides ways to enliven the park, make it more ﬂ exible, improve its ecological funcƟ on, broaden its appeal to more user groups, and make it more accessible to more people in Eagan. Based on feedback during public engagement, many peo- ple have a percepƟ on that the park is larger than it actually is. Many people use the Unisys and Delta properƟ es for daily walks, bike rides and general park use – even sledding in the winter. Furthermore, the parking lots, empty much of the Ɵ me, are used as overﬂ ow event parking. The Plan both expands the size of the park while clearly deﬁ ning its edges. New development on the edges of the park is oriented to the park. Speciﬁ cally, townhouses or walk-up units on the Delta site face the park, and new restaurants will have generous paƟ os and verandas overlooking the bluff on the Unisys Site. Two small sites have been idenƟ - ﬁ ed on the Delta site for potenƟ al uses that both support the neighborhood and help acƟ vate the park. Uses such as day care and small retail can be considered in these two locaƟ ons. The Plan proposes slight rearrangements and expansions to Central Park so it is more ﬂ exible, acƟ ve, connected and ecologically responsive. The bluff on the Unisys site becomes part of the park – protecƟ ng it from development and ensuring it remains the wooded backdrop to the park. It can be enhanced with trails, ecological improvements, and light programming such as a ropes or parkour course. The Plan expands Central Park between the Delta and Uni- sys Sites – allowing Central Park to extend fully from Quar- ry Park to Pilot Knob park. Expanding the Park allows it to have a stronger relaƟ onship to the development sites, be more connected internally and externally, be more acƟ ve and accessible, and to perform an important stormwater and ecological role (discussed below). The Plan proposes to regrade the rugby ﬁ elds so they are level with the Oval. This will off er opportuniƟ es to expand the use of both the ﬁ elds and the Oval – providing more ﬂ exibility and capacity to host exisƟ ng and new events in the park. Lowering the ﬁ elds will create a slight slope on their north side which can be used for seaƟ ng or passive use. ConsideraƟ on should be given to providing ﬁ elds that are more ﬂ exible and usable throughout the year by invesƟ ng in new (arƟ ﬁ cial) turf, lights, and other features that expand the use of the park. The Plan proposes a series of trail loops and connecƟ ons within the park. Trail investments will help to organize and acƟ vate the park – creaƟ ng diff erent zones (meadow, lake, bluff , sports, ECC) each with their own walking loops and idenƟ ty. Each loop is approximately ½ mile. Togeth- er these loops will create a single loop encompassing the enƟ re park (approximately 2 miles). And ﬁ nally, the Plan surrounds the Park with a land use strategy that creates desƟ naƟ ons such as restaurants or other outdoor oriented uses along the edges of the park – so the park is for more than today’s park goers. The park is enlivened by acƟ ve uses along its edges. In total, the new park will be more connected and accessi- ble to more people, more acƟ ve, more ecologically respon- sive, and more adaptable to new user groups, acƟ viƟ es, and events. Its edges will be clearly deﬁ ned and it will give value to both the adjacent properƟ es and the community as a whole. Overall Strategy Trail Diagram FIELDFIELD MEADOWMEADOW BLUFFBLUFF ECCECC 10June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 10 Stormwater Strategy The sites are in a DWSMA (Drinking Water Supply Man- agement Area) which contain rules and regulaƟ ons for protecƟ on of the region’s drinking water supply. Eagan is required to adopt wellhead protecƟ on plans that generally prohibit inﬁ ltraƟ on into the ground water within a DWS- MA. Today, the Delta and Unisys sites are out of compliance with local and regional stormwater and water manage- ment regulaƟ ons. The two sites are over 50% impervious and each has an approximately 10-acre parking lot. While the sites have been “quiet” in recent years, and have some valuable ecological features, such as mature trees and some wetlands, they are not prisƟ ne. In order to protect ground water and encourage rede- velopment, the Plan recommends developing a regional (or semi-regional) stormwater approach that enables the two sites to develop more effi ciently, while also adding Overall Strategy Stormwater Diagram signiﬁ cant public beneﬁ ts to the community. A regional approach to stormwater would leverage the topography and hydrology of the site to manage much (or all) of the new development’s stormwater needs in the exisƟ ng and expanded park. Through a combinaƟ on of bioswales, raingardens, natural ﬁ ltering systems and newly constructed wet ponds adja- cent to exisƟ ng wetlands, the Plan extends nature’s ability to manage stormwater, while simultaneously delivering a series of important public beneﬁ ts – such as new recre- aƟ onal features, educaƟ onal opportuniƟ es, improved hab- itat, stronger tree canopy, and reduced heat island eff ect – as well as greater development potenƟ al which translates into stronger public revenues. Expanding the park and developing a regional stormwa- ter system are linked strategies – one requires the other. Detailed stormwater study is needed to determine precise acreages and locaƟ ons. to pipes to green infrastructure 11June 2023 City of Eagan, MN NORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 11 CirculaƟ on and Access Strategy The plan proposes speciﬁ c alignment of two roads. One will be a conƟ nuous public road connecƟ ng Pilot Knob Road with Central Parkway. This road will be located 400 feet south of Towerview Road, aligned with Quarry Lane. A new traffi c signal in this locaƟ on is mid-point between Lone Oak Road and Central Parkway. A new signal may be warranted in the future, and this locaƟ on will provide a safe and convenient pedestrian and bike crossing locaƟ on – thereby connecƟ ng the redevelopment areas and the park to neighbors on the east side of Pilot Knob Road. The main road will traverse both the Delta and Unisys sites and loop around the west edge of the park. This road will be in an approximately 100-foot right-of-way and will house all the main trunk lines for development. Above ground, the Plan anƟ cipates this roadway to change in character along its mile length – responding to its adjacent land uses. Throughout its length, it will remain a two-lane road, with sidewalks, trails, pedestrian ameniƟ es, and bioswales for stormwater. Where the road is adjacent to the west edge of park, the road will have bays for parallel parking on both sides of the street. This will off er 100-150 parking spaces for park users – especially those who are aƩ ending events at the ﬁ eld. The second road is located on the south edge of the Delta site adjacent to the north edge of the park. This road should be a narrow two-way road with parking on the park side of the road, a sidewalk on its north edge, and a trail on its south edge. This road will off er approximately 65 addiƟ onal parking spaces for park visitors. AddiƟ onal roads (likely private) will be needed through- out both sites. The illustraƟ ve Plan shows a potenƟ al grid paƩ ern that is walkable, connected, and conducive to a variety of development types and densiƟ es. Conclusions Like all redevelopments, this Plan seeks to balance public needs with market demand; and public revenues with the ability to deliver appropriate infrastructure. IniƟ al ﬁ scal analysis indicates expected revenues from this plan is ap- proximately equal to the public costs of the project. Sim- ilarly, iniƟ al market study indicates that the development program (1,200 housing and 400,000 square feet of offi ce/ clinic space) is likely supportable over 20 years – a typical absorpƟ on period for a site of this size. Next Steps and ImplementaƟ on Upon Council review the project will move into its ﬁ nal phase. The team will make adjustments to the Plan, con- ﬁ rm technical consideraƟ ons (traffi c and stormwater) and develop an implementaƟ on strategy. Final Plan documents will be presented to City Council in winter 2024. Overall Strategy Street DiagramTrail Diagram Entry RoadMeadow crossing Neighborhood Parkway Park Edge Park Edge (Delta) Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan October 10, 2023 Background The Project Area Central Commons Special Area Identified as a Special Area in 2040 Comprehensive Plan Guiding Principles for redevelopment have been approved Surrounded by vacant and underutilized private properties High visibility within the City Adjacent to Eagan Central Park and Community Center Small Area Plan Timeline March 22, 2022 Direction to draft RFP August 16, 2022 Council approval of RFP December 6, 2022 Approval of contract with Bolton & Menk February 14, 2023 Work Session –initial progress report June 13, 2023 Work Session –concept plans October 10, 2023 Work Session –draft preferred plan Public Engagement •Engage a diversity of voices •Many ways to engage •Multiple phases •Reach Public Engagement Strategy •Video •Social Media •Letters •Website Engagement Tactics •Emails •Surveys –Nearly 1300 responses Engagement Tactics •Translation Engagement Tactics •Print •Newsletter Engagement Tactics •Engagement in the school at Pilot Knob Elementary Engagement Tactics •In person engagement in the community at events •Meetings with property owners and ISD 197 Engagement Tactics Public Feedback Concerns regarding development and anxiety about changes to neighborhoods and Central Park Skepticism about viability of corporate campus Concerns about existing vacant retail Opposition to new housing, particularly affordable and high-density Concerns on loss of event parking on private property Strong opposition of road connection to existing neighborhoods Oslund-Timberline neighborhood Four Oaks/Alden Pond neighborhoods Public Feedback Feedback reflected community’s hopes and vision Desire for new retail, restaurants, and services Walkable, well-connected commercial and residential neighborhoods A few expressed support for additional housing options including affordable and senior housing Very strong support for park expansion and improvements, preservation of the bluff, and protection of natural environment Public Feedback Very strong support for park expansion Preferred Concept –Park Runs Through It Expansion of Central Park Expansion of Pilot Knob Park Preservation of the bluff Protection of natural environment Public perception that Central Park is larger than it is Property Owner Feedback Sites are currently being marketed Desire short-term redevelopment for high-demand uses High-density residential Flex commercial/industrial Brokers would like list of “no go” uses ISD 197 Feedback Supportive of improved trail access to Central Park Supportive of new housing connected to school via trails Development phasing Types and numbers of new housing units Plan for increased enrollment Influencing Factors Flex Commercial/Industrial Flex space for tenants with changing needs for office, manufacturing, and warehouse space Broker –maximum 30% office and 18-20 foot clear height Typical flex space 24-28 foot clear height Rectangular building with one elevation dock doors and truck court 8-10 jobs per acre Lowest City tax revenue per acre (low finish levels, single-story construction) Trend for less percentage office, more dock doors and outdoor storage Park Dedication New development pays park dedication to support expansion of park system Rates differ for commercial (per square foot) and residential (per unit) development Flex buildings -$2,600/acre Commercial buildings -$19,000/acre Apartment buildings -$122,000/acre Hydrology Delta and Unisys not in compliance with current stormwater regulations Age of development Amount of impervious surface Lack of water quality and quantity infrastructure Drinking Water Supply Management Area –off-site infiltration Potential system that improves sustainability and enhances public open space Draft Preferred Plan Draft Preferred Plan Balances needs of City Council, community members, and property owners Meets Guiding Principles for the Central Commons Special Area Plan Support dense, mixed-use development with a range of retail, office services, medium/high-density residential, employment and public spaces uses Design the development to ensure cohesiveness with neighboring uses and enhance pedestrian connections Respect existing site condition and natural features –design with natural systems in mind Create an integrated transportation system that organizes pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular and transit movements Next Steps Staff and consultants will make revisions requested by City Council Provide informational updates to committees and commissions Prepare final plan documents for presentation to Council in winter 2024 Prepare potential strategies for implementation Policy Questions 1.Do you support the idea of expanding the park so it is more connected and active? 2.Do you support meeting development stormwater needs in a manner that enhances public open space? 3.Do you support a land use vision for the project area that delivers park compatible uses that are relatively mixed, compact, and walkable? 1October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 1 Northwest Commons Small Area Plan 2October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 2 AGENDA POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Recap of Initial Three Concepts 2. Review of Public Engagement 3. Draft Preferred Plan a. Design Goals and Principles b. Vision for the Site c. Land Uses, Open Spaces, Streets 1. Do you support the idea of expanding the park so it is more connected and active? 2. Do you support meeting development stormwater needs in a manner that enhances public open space? 3. Do you support a land use vision for the Unisys and Delta sites that delivers park compatible uses that are relatively mixed, compact, and walkable? 3October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 3 1 ENGAGEMENT 3 CONCEPT PLANS & IMPACTS REVIEW 2 CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 4 DRAFT AREA PLAN PROJECT TIMELINE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan Schedule 4October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 4 PARK VERSUS PERCEPTION OF THE PARK Pkg Pkg Pkg Pkg Pkg Pkg A BA B Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park CENTRAL PARK DELTA UNISYS ARGOSY 5October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 5 JOBS ON THE PARK PI L O T K N O B R D PI L O T K N O B R D CENTRAL P K W Y CENTRAL P K W Y RED CEDAR RDRED CEDAR RD CORP. CAMPUSCORP. CAMPUS HOUSINGHOUSING HOUSINGHOUSING OFFICE / OFFICE / MEDICAL OFFICEMEDICAL OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE RESTAURANT/ RESTAURANT/ RETAILRETAIL JURDY RD JURDY RD CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE HOUSINGHOUSING HOUSINGHOUSING HOUSINGHOUSING OFFICE / OFFICE / MEDICAL OFFICEMEDICAL OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE RESTAURANT/ RESTAURANT/ RETAILRETAIL PI L O T K N O B R D PI L O T K N O B R D CENTRAL P K W Y CENTRAL P K W Y TOWERVIEW RDTOWERVIEW RD RED CEDAR RDRED CEDAR RD JURDY RD JURDY RD A PARK RUNS THROUGH IT HOUSINGHOUSING HOUSINGHOUSING HOUSINGHOUSING OFFICE / OFFICE / MEDICAL OFFICEMEDICAL OFFICE OFFICEOFFICE RESTAURANT/ RESTAURANT/ RETAILRETAIL PI L O T K N O B R D PI L O T K N O B R D CENTRAL P K W Y CENTRAL P K W Y TOWERVIEW RDTOWERVIEW RD RED CEDAR RDRED CEDAR RD JURDY RD JURDY RD UNISYSUNISYSDELTADELTA ARGOSYARGOSY UNISYSUNISYSDELTADELTA ARGOSYARGOSY UNISYSUNISYSDELTADELTA ARGOSYARGOSY Key Elements: • Park boundary and programming unchanged •Jobs and commercial uses are primary uses •Large single-tenant corporate campus •Vehicular access layout largely unchanged •Trail-only connection between parks •Bluff is preserved under private ownership Key Elements: • Developed Bluff • Highest range of residential densities / choices • Limited mixed-use development • Relocated rugby ﬁ elds • Structured public parking adjacent to community center Key Elements: • Rugby ﬁelds relocated to Pilot Knob Park • Bluff is preserved through public ownership • Expanded housing options • Park sale / acquisition • Additional park programming / activities 6October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 6 DESIGN PRINCIPLES Grow Central Park and Preserve the Bluff 1. Create one continuous public space between Pilot Knob Park and Quarry Park through Central Park. 2. Preserve the bluff so it can be incorporated into a larger park vision. 3. Better incorporate the rugby fi elds into the park experience. Preserve easements and existing buff ers for protection of water distribution lines. 3 4 4 2 4 2 1 1 4 4 3 4 1 Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park ECC 7October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 7 Enhance connections to and through Central Park 1. Create comfortable mobility connections between Central Park and surrounding neighborhoods, particularly for those walking or rolling. 2. Promote walking and biking as a form of moving to and through the park and surrounding development. 3. Enhance the safety and comfort for pedestrians and bikers within and around Central Park. 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 DESIGN PRINCIPLES Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park ECC 2 3 8October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 8 Surround Central Park with uses that are compatible with the park, and that enhance the park experience. 1. Introduce uses along the park edge that see the park and a value-adding amenity, activate the edge of the park, and benefi t park users. 2. Maintain public access around the park and defi ne a clear park edge. 3. Foster a mix of land uses that bring activity and ‘eyes on the park' for a majority of the day and evening. 1 3 1 2 2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park ECC 9October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 9 Increase the diversity of housing choices for Eagan residents. 1. Develop a variety of housing types for all life stages. 2.Create natural transitions between existing and future neighborhoods. 3. Build walkable neighborhoods with safe, and comfortable connections to surrounding uses, including Central Park. 4. Delta will be primarily housing, with small complementary neighborhood serving retail uses. 1 3 3 1 2 4 2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park ECC 10October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 10 Plan for fl exible employment-oriented commercial uses. 1.Establish an employment district of fl exible commercial and offi ce uses, supportive of residential mixed use. 2.Create walkable neighborhoods as an amenity for employment uses and to increase area access. 3.Allow complementary retail and commercial uses that appeal both to residential neighborhoods, other businesses, and park visitors. 4.Unisys will become primarily commercial, with complementary uses such as retail and some housing. 1 2 4 3 2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park ECC 11October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 11 Improve the ecological function of the site. 1. Provide protection of historic wetlands by increasing upstream stormwater management and promotion of site infi ltration or other runoff capture practices. 2. Work with the site topography to utilize open channels and piping when appropriate to protect bluff lines, eroding ravine heads, and restored channels. 3. Utilize regional stormwater management system where appropriate by creating wet ponds and other fl ow management strategies. 4. Incorporate stormwater strategies into the site as amenities for residents and visitors. 1 1 2 3 4 DESIGN PRINCIPLES 12October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 12 Delta A series of mixed neighborhoods, closely connected to the park providing needed housing for a growing Eagan. Unisys An activity center with jobs, restaurants, and park oriented uses arranged in a compact and walkable pattern. Central Park The City's premier park, home to large events as well as daily recreation and respite; connected to the city with active trails and programs. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park UNISYSUNISYSDELTADELTA CENTRAL CENTRAL PARKPARK ECC 13October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 13 Central Park height linit Delta Unisys LAND USE Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Pi lo t K t Kn ob RRoa d UNISYSUNISYSDELTADELTA NEIGHBORHOODNEIGHBORHOOD park supporting usepark supporting use Park supporting usePark supporting use P a r k s u p p o r t i n g u s e NEIGHBORHOODNEIGHBORHOOD EMPLOYMENTEMPLOYMENT NEIGHBORHOODNEIGHBORHOOD CENTRAL CENTRAL PARKPARK rrrrtititi rti AA AA 14 Range of Outcomes Low High Medium Density Residential avg. 12-16 u/a 35 50 Low- High Density Residential avg. 21-25 u/a 150 175 Medium-High Density Residential avg. 33-40 u/a 65 85 High Density Residential avg. 50-60 u/a 700 840 Housing Totals 950 1200 Offi ce / Clinic / Hotel 300,000 500,000 Restaurant Retail / Park Oriented 30,000 50,000 Neighborhood Supporting / Park Oriented 5,000 15,000 Housing Units SF SF SF October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 14 DENSITY Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park Central Park 180 - 225 units 200-240 units 220,000 sf - 220,000 sf - 420,000 SF420,000 SF 80,000 SF80,000 SF 550 - 680 units 15 Medium Density Residential avg. 12-16 u/a Low- High Density Residential avg. 21-25 u/a Medium-High Density Residential avg. 33-40 u/a High Density Residential avg. 50-60 u/a October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 15 DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY LOW-HIGH DENSITY HIGHMEDIUM HIGH 16October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 16 A series of mixed neighborhoods, closely connected to the park providing needed housing for a growing Eagan. Oslund Timberline Neighborhood Oslund Timberline Neighborhood Central Park Central Park Public Road Existing Tree Lined Buff er DELTA SITE trail gentle slope to ﬁ elds Park Edge Road DELTA SITE pkg pkg 17October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 17 An activity center with jobs, restaurants, and park oriented uses arranged in a compact and walkable pattern. Central Park Central Park Public Road 50' limit Public Road Bluff Restaurants on the edge of the bluff Restaurants on the edge of the bluff Offi ce or clinic Offi ce or clinic Offi ce or clinic Offi ce or clinic UNISYS SITE Bluff Bluff TrailTrail RestaurantsRestaurants nniccicicicccccccciccccccicccciciciciccicicciciciciciciccicccicicccciciciiccicciciciiccicccccciciiicccciciiccccccccccccccicicciccccciciciciciccccccccicicccccicicccccccccciccciicicicicicicicciciiccciicic 18 Offi ce Shared Parking Retail October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 18 ARGOSY 80,000 SF Multi Tenant Offi ce Retain Shared Parking Retail Outlot Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park Central Park 19October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 19 The City's community park, home to large events as well as daily recreation and respite; connected to the city with active trails and programs. CENTRAL PARK Bluff Stormwater Fields ECC Park Supporting Use Park Supporting Use Restaurants Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park Central Park 20October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 20 The City's premier park, home to large events as well as daily recreation and respite; connected to the city with active trails and programs. Meadow Loop Bluff Loop Water Loop ECC Loop Quarry Park To Four Oaks / Alden Pond Neighborhood To Oslund Timberline Neighborhood Pilot Knob Park to Lone Oak Trail and School Field Loop TRAILS Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park 21October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 21 Regional Stormwater Design Semi-Regional Stormwater Design High Flow Wet Pond Protected Wetland / River Water Quality Filter (wetland) Water Quality Filter (wetland) Wet Pond Park Boundary / Public Land Moderate Flow Low Flow Low Flow On-site flow management Low Flow Low Flow Use existing hydrology and topography to create a stormwater system that delivers broad public benefi ts, as well as enhanced development and revenue. STORMWATER 22October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 22 STORMWATER Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park Central Park DELTADELTA UNISYSUNISYS CENTRAL CENTRAL PARKPARK 23 Entry DriveMeadow Crossing Neig h b o r h o o d Park w a y Delt a P a r k E d g e Pa r k E d g e October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 23 Meadow Crossing Delta Park Edge STREETS Neighborhood Parkway Park Edge Entry Drive Pi l o t K n o b R o a d Quarry Park Pilot Knob Park Central Park 24 today: 0 tomorrow 110 today: 0 tomorrow: +/- 500tomorrow: +/- 500 today: 6 tomorrow: 40 today: 300today: 300 tomorrow: 300tomorrow: 300 today: 0 tomorrow 65 today: 0 tomorrow 150 today: 385 tomorrow 385 today: 52 tomorrow: 52 October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 24 PARKING AND ACCESS Ensure adequate parking and access for large events Ensure more convenient parking and access to more parts of the expanded park on a daily basis Expanded trail access so more people can get to the park without a car TODAY Publicly owned parking today 443 Public parking through partnership (Argosy)300 TOTAL EVENT PARKING TODAY 743 TOMORROW IN PLAN Public parking tomorrow 802 Public parking through partnerships (Unisys and Argosy) +/ - 800 TOTAL EVENT PARKING TOMORROW +/-1602 Pi l o t K n o b R o a dtrail connectionsPilot Knob Park Central Park trail connection trail connection trail connection trail connection trail connection 25October 3, 2023Eagan, MinnesotaNORTHWEST COMMONS SMALL AREA PLAN 25 •Expanded Central Park with preserved bluff and sustainability improvements •Increase in public event parking •More ﬂ exible ﬁ eld and event space •Preservation of landscape buff er and compatible uses adjacent to existing neighborhoods •Walkable commercial districts and connected neighborhoods •Mutually beneﬁ cial land uses adjacent to park •High-quality jobs and high-value commercial tax base •Public investments supported by development revenue •Market-supported uses within a reasonable development timeline CONCLUSION Below are guiding principles established in the Central Commons Special Area Plan adopted March 2, 2020. Central Commons Special Area Plan Guiding Principles No matter the type of development occurring in the Central Commons Area, the following Guiding Principles shall be considered in future land use decisions: 1. Understand the context of any development or redevelopment within Eagan and the Central Area. 2. Support dense, mixed-use development with a range of retail, office, services, medium/high- density residential, employment and public space uses. 3. Design the development to ensure cohesiveness with neighboring uses and enhance pedestrian connections. 4. Respect existing site conditions and natural features - design with natural systems in mind. 5. Capitalize on opportunities to create and enhance pedestrian connections. 6. Allow Planned Developments to be used when incorporating housing and mixed use into developments. 7. Require high-quality design of sites and buildings that creates a cohesive identity for the Central Commons Area and offers flexibility that can respond to change in uses over time. Strive for pedestrian-scale buildings that are two to four stories in height. Create identity through the design character of the edges, i.e. the streetscape, building placement and gateway signage. 8. Encourage the use of design guidelines and standards to create a cohesive look within developments while still allowing enough variety to encourage visual interest. 9. Strategically place buildings toward the street with parking behind to help create clearly defined streets and public areas. 10. Develop public gathering spaces or smaller, linked amenity areas (public or privately owned). 11. Create an integrated transportation system that organizes pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular and transit movements. Use streetscape enhancements to create an identifying character for the Central Area. 12. Utilize a shared or district parking approach to minimize the amount of spaces and size of parking lots. Where feasible, use structured or underground parking. Break up large parking areas with landscaped drive aisles, islands and sidewalks. 13. Support the incorporation of sustainable building and site design practices. 14. Ensure appropriate noise reduction measures (45 dB interior noise level) are met during construction for areas that are impacted by airport noise contours, especially for sensitive uses such as schools, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential. On Thu, 27 Jul, 2023 at 1:27 PM, Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> wrote: To: johnanngustin@q.com Mr. Gustin - I am the City Planner for Eagan and I am responding on behalf of Jill Hutmacher. First, I want to thank you for your comments regarding Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan, your feedback is important to help shape the plan as it moves forward. Your comments will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration in this matter. The three concepts that were presented to the public at the July 19th Eagan Marketfest (and again at a second public outreach scheduled for August 16th Marketfest) were derived based on early conversations with City Council, City staff, and the general public. The concepts were intentionally varied regarding land use (i.e. residential, office, retail, etc.), intensity, road networks, and impacts to Central Park to instigate conversations with the public. Staff understands some aspects of the concepts would be less popular than others, but wanted input from residents. The intent of the public outreach is to gather this input and move forward the various aspects that will generate a singular concept. This helps inform potential brokers and developers representing the current property owners of City land use parameters, scale, access limitations, and other issues and opportunities that arise through the planning process. It is not meant to provide specific design details as these will not be known until more detailed plans are proposed by a potential developer.. The Small Area Plan is intended to serve as guide for future purchasers and developers of the property and is only the first step in what will be a long review process to redevelop the properties. Addition mandatory steps (e.g. reguiding and rezoning the property, review of development plans and plats, etc.) will involve notification to residents inviting them to attend and comment on development proposals during public hearings. The redevelopment of the sites will also likely require an environmental study that will include traffic counts and a traffic study of the area that will review road widths, road capacity and other traffic related matters. However, that will not occur until the ultimate mix and intensity of land uses is determined for the site. It is premature at this time to involve a traffic study until a final concept plan has been determined and a development proposal is presented for the properties. Regarding your comment on the information in the SUN This Week. Staff apologies if the information provided in the SUN was incorrect, it appears they provided an incorrect web address. The City has promoted the survey via various media outlets, social media, email, our City website and to 2,800 people who subscribe to received engagement updates from the City. To date the City has received over 430 responses to the survey. If you have any questions please feel free to email or call me at the number provided below. Respectfully, Mike Schultz City Planner From: John Gustin <johnanngustin@q.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 8:45:12 PM To: Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com> Cc: johnanngustin@q.com <johnanngustin@q.com> Subject: Northwest Central Commons Plan Dear Ms. Hutmacher, SUN This Week for Burnsville & Eagan dated July 21, 2023, has an article about the Northwest Central Commons Area. I take serious issue with two concepts of the proposed plan and one part of the article. 1. Concepts #2 and #3, as pictured on page 8A, show what appear to be massive amounts of new housing development. In addition, those concepts show an extension of Pine Ridge Road into those new housing developments. If either of those concepts comes to pass and Pine Ridge Road is extended into those proposed housing developments, you will effectively ruin the neighborhood in which I live. We live in a relatively small, quiet neighborhood set apart from the main thoroughfares & fast traffic like Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Roads, etc. My neighbors and I LIKE it the way it is and do not want that to change! In addition, Pine Ridge Road is narrower than Woodlark Lane, on which I live. It appears you would plan to widen Pine Ridge & probably some additional streets, or else a whole bunch of new traffic would come in on Woodlark Lane. In my opinion, neither of those choices is satisfactory and is absolutely wrong for our city and our neighborhood! Concept #1 is certainly the least objectionable of the three, if you want to use up open space and create some new housing opportunities. 2. The SUN This Week article refers to an online survey in which I may previously have been invited by e- mail to participate. When I tried to do so, I was told by 'the system' that the survey was closed; that there were enough participants. The SUN This Week article also referred to an erroneous website address titled 'eagan.com/central-commons.' It should have read 'cityofeagan.com/central-commons.' Regardless, I was unable to participate in the survey and that irks me. Had I been able to participate in the survey, perhaps I would not have needed to write this letter. As it turns out, a neighbor of ours, a Mr. John Sealey, 3046 Pine Ridge Dr., sent us all a notice yesterday in which he described the 3 Concepts. What I found particularly interesting, since I already knew about the proposals, was reference to a second survey at https://polco.us/n/res/vote/eagan-mn/northwest-central-commons-2! What is this? A big secret? Did you really want feedback from us, or were you just kidding? I truly look forward to a response from you and some future discussion about this project! Sincerely, John M. Gustin, 3061 Woodlark Lane, Eagan, MN 55121 Ph. 651-452-7865 From:Lisa Lopez To:Jill Hutmacher; Erik Slettedahl Subject:Feedback regarding the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2023 5:07:51 PM Hello, I have been a resident of Eagan since 2019, when I moved from St. Paul. I live in a townhome on Farnum Drive, near Four Oaks. I was attracted to Eagan because of its abundance of green areas and the quietness of our neighborhood. My husband is a runner and Cross-country coach. I am a federal civil servant and I volunteer as an organizer for the Twin Cities hiking club, so walking/hiking among nature is my thing. I am very concerned about the proposed development in the old Delta site. Currently my family uses the trail at the corner of Four Oaks and Farnum drive for pedestrian access to Towerview Road to get to the Central Park as well as Pilot Knob Park and the trails connecting Pilot Knob Park and the Elementary School. That area is one of my favorite areas to relax near my home, especially the most rustic trail around the pond behind the elementary school. As a runner, my husband uses that path as a safe running area, where he can run without worrying about crossing any dangerous intersections. We are concerned that concepts 1 and 2 seem to eliminate our current pedestrian access to both Central Park and Pilot Knob Park. I believe that the residents of the 80 townhomes in our association if the hundreds of townhomes and apartments near Four Oaks would also share our feelings about this option. We love being able to walk not only to use the park, but for the farmer market and events like the fireworks. Your recent survey said about 15% of Central Park visitors get there by walking. We are in that 15%. Block our usual path and you will lose some gym memberships and other Central Park visitors. Although not clear from the concept drawing, it seems concept 3 might have vehicular access from the Delta site to Four Oaks. We hope that is not the case. We believe that a bike trail might be great but vehicular increase to Four Oaks will decrease not only the value of our homes as well as those in Coachman Rd but also safety in the area. We are also concerned about how the increased vehicular traffic near the Delta site will impact the safety for children that currently use the area to bike and/or play. Children in the Pilot Knob Elementary School should have safe pedestrian/bike access between the Elementary school to Central Park. I strongly believe that the elevated risk due to the increase in vehicular traffic caused by the extensive proposed housing/businesses development is not worth the million of dollars of increase revenue for the city. Lastly, I am concerned about how this increased development will increase the noise level in our neighborhood. Right now, I cannot hear cars pass by inside our home. It is awesome to be able to get back from work to your own mini paradise retreat. I hope that does not change. I believe that a significant % of this area should be reserved for additional green areas, passive recreation, etc. so that the density in the population and traffic doesn’t increase so much that the level of noise, pedestrian and vehicular risk undermine the current vibe of the area. I believe that protecting the bluff, and expanding the park are great ideas, but not enough. Consider adding additional green areas among housing, passive play areas, etc. similar to the Centennial Lakes Park concept. If the City cannot afford purchasing the property to keep it green, then demand that any developer keep a large % of the area for green areas and passive recreation as a condition for permits. Central Park, the Bluff and green area between Pilot Knob Park and the elementary school should be all connected through hiking trails and the elementary school and the Central Park should have biking trails that go around without the need to cross any roads so that it is safe for children. An indoor pool would be fantastic! Even if it was managed by a private entity as long as it was open to all. Most pools in the area are closed to residents of specific communities, or require expensive memberships. My community doesn't have a pool, so I don't get to swim even though my doctor recommends I decrease my hiking and increase my swimming. One other thing to consider is that Eagan doesn’t currently have a hospital. Last year my husband had a medical emergency that required hospitalization and we had to drive for a while during a blizzard to get to the nearest ER. It would be interesting to get a hospital before we keep adding more housing to Eagan, specially in this neighborhood. Even the urgent care centers within the area frequently don’t have the capacity to see you the same day! I believe no one would be upset if we were able to get a hospital here or at the Blue Cross/Blue Shield campus. I definitively agree that the Argosy university site should be redeveloped either as retail, business, or housing. It is an eyesore. Just make sure to keep access to the trail behind it. As a representative not only of my own family but as one of the largest hiking clubs in Minnesota, I will always promote having more trails and never to reduce access to them. I would like to officially request that this message is kept as part of the official record of feedback received. I had sent a message earlier through the city's website, because I was unable to attend the April meeting because of work travel and I didn't see it as part of the feedback in the documentation for this project. Cordially, Lisa M Lopez From:Erik Slettedahl To:Carla Winder Subject:RE: Northwest Central Commons Date:Friday, July 21, 2023 8:58:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hello Carla Thank you for reaching out and providing your thoughtful comments and concerns. I may have spoken with you and your husband Wednesday night at Marketfest? I did speak to many residents and neighbors of yours that have similar concerns. I will forward your email to the rest of the staff and consultants as it is a good representation of the comments we’ve heard and initial results from the survey. I’ve already provided some feedback to them regarding another similar email we received to look at preserving some of these border areas as conservation easements or even along the water and well area easements as green areas. This is still in conceptual stage but we will discuss adding a “green” buffer around the perimeter as a concept. The purpose of the special area plan is to provide direction and parameters to potential developers who will be interested in these sites. We expect a high level if interest. Although the City has some say over land use and zoning requirements, please keep in mind this is private property and not City owned or controlled. If/when there are development changes to the sites, the details will most likely be worked out during the land use, zoning, and subdivision processes, which all require public hearing. Thank you again for reaching out and will be keep your email as part of the project record. Erik Erik Slettedahl Planner/GIS Specialist 3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122 Office: 651-675-5692 https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Carla Winder <carlawinder1120@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 10:26 PM To: Erik Slettedahl <ESlettedahl@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Northwest Central Commons Erik, We moved to Eagan in 2000 because of the beautiful wide open green spaces and the proximity to the core cities. When we decided to downsize 4 years ago we didn't consider anywhere but Eagan. We found our ""little slice of heaven" in a simple townhome on the northeast corner of Farnum Drive.The attached picture is my view as I sit on my deck this lovely evening. Every neighbor we meet, moved here for the green space and serenity. Each morning I walk down to Central Park and walk around the pond. I walk my grandkids down to play and use the splash pad. We bike around the area and go to Marketfest. Now we stand to lose our quiet and views with this new development coming in. How will walking my young grandkids to the park from here change with dense housing and traffic.What will it do to our privacy and quiet on the deck in the evening? I get it--progress needs to happen but it makes me sad that all the green space that brought us to Eagan many years ago seems to be gone now--all turned into multi-unit homes and businesses.And yes, Central Park will still be there but when you surround it with dense housing, businesses, traffic and roads, take out beautiful mature trees and views, the whole dynamic is going to change. It won't be the same, it won't be the peaceful, quiet walk I and many others enjoy each morning. So I wanted to share my feedback from my deck chair: · Please save the mature trees on the north and west edge and give a wide buffer zone between the new development and the single families homes and townhomes already in existence.That would help to lessen the impact for us all. · We already have hundreds of multi housing units on Coachman and Quarry Road along with all the many businesses. The possibility of up to 2500 more housing units/cars plus more businesses packed into this area? What impact will that be with so much traffic already? Please don't allow that many units. It's way too much for this area.. · Require that the developer put an above average amount of green space, parks, ponds, etc. into the new development to preserve some of the beauty here. When I look at the plans and all the orange squares shoved together, all I can think of is that ugly, sterile, packed development in Apple Valley down by the post office. It can't be all buildings close together with a road. · Don't allow tall apartment buildings that limit the views and stick out on the skyline. Please consider the neighbors to this property who have enjoyed the beauty and peace of this area. Help us preserve some of what we all moved here for. Carla Winder 3146B Farnum Drive Eagan From:Jill Hutmacher To:John Sealey Subject:RE: Oslund Timberline Complaint Submission - (Northwest Central Commons) Date:Tuesday, August 8, 2023 6:58:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Mr. Sealey, Thank you for your patience with our response. It sounds like you may not have received my out-of- office response during my planned vacation, but I’m thankful to have teammates like Mike Schultz that once he was aware that you hadn’t received a response, responded promptly. Going forward, I’ll be your point of contact for our communications regarding the small area plan. I’m confirming that all the feedback you have provided has been a part of the public record and is shared with the City Council. Other correspondences and all survey comments/results are posted with the June 13 agenda. (See IV – Public Comments.) Additional comments will be posted/shared in future City Council agenda packets and made available to the public. Public engagement has been a core value of this small area plan, and to date, we’ve engaged with over 1,000 residents both in-person and digitally. The digital survey is still open through Sunday, August 20, and all residents, including those who live in the neighborhood, are invited to join us for another public engagement event on Wednesday, August 16 at Eagan Market Fest. The City Council has made its goals clear that we engage with all residents in Eagan as we plan this area's future. Thank you for your time, and passion, and for providing your voice in planning Eagan’s future. Jill Jill HutmacherDirector of Community Development3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122Office: 651-675-5653https://www.cityofeagan.com From: John Sealey <jmsealey@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2023 12:34 PM To: Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> Cc: City Council <CityCouncil@cityofeagan.com>; Mike Maguire <MMaguire@cityofeagan.com>; Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com>; Andrew Pimental <apimental@cityofeagan.com>; Jared Flewellen <jflewellen@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Re: Oslund Timberline Complaint Submission - (Northwest Central Commons) Mike, Thanks for circling back after days of no response, and it taking me to follow up to get a response. I’ve attended an earlier pop up informational meeting at the ECC in the Spring and was left very underwhelmed by the answers given to me. Yes, your counter will be that it was early in the process. But, the people from Bolton and Menk were seriously not qualified to answer questions from residents. It was eye opening. It’s similar to the market fest pop up informational setup. It is not conducive to have a discussion on an important matter such as this at a market fest. It’s busy, loud, and difficult to not feel rushed when having a conversation. Residents who have families may have a harder time to carve out time to attend this as well. Honestly, the market fest info event did not offer much value. But, I understand why you are doing these events to satisfy that the city is open to listening. Got it. Just let us know when you’re available to come meet our neighborhood in person for feedback, and we can start from there. Feel free to offer a date and time to have a productive conversation which will give you feedback that your team welcomes. Thanks, John On Aug 5, 2023, at 12:04 PM, John Sealey <jmsealey@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Jill, No out of office response came back to my email. Otherwise I wouldn’t have emailed last night. Best, John On Aug 5, 2023, at 9:12 AM, Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> wrote: Mr. Sealey, My apologies for not responding to your original email regarding this matter. As you are aware a number of your Oslund Timberline neighbors have also sent inquiries regarding the street connection illustrated on two of the preliminary concept plans, which I provided response to, but again apologize for not getting back to you sooner. First allow me to explain where we are at in the Small Area Plan process. We are currently in the public engagement period where staff and the consultant are vetting the three possible concepts with the public. This initially began with the City Council at the June 13th meeting, then with the resident engagement at the July 19th Marketfest, and another to be held at the August 16th Marketfest. In addition the City has held a very aggressive public outreach that has resulted in numerous survey results and input. The purpose of the three concepts were to instigate discussion on the basic elements that reimagine the three subject properties. Those basic element involve potential land uses, street network/connections, pedestrian connections and ultimately the relationship with Central Park. The road connections illustrated on the three concepts are not set in stone, but intended to contemplate possible connections given the limited access of the two sites north of the park. Following the public engagement and input, a single concept will be imagined that will help guide redevelopment of the sites, but with the understanding there will be some flexibility once a developer comes forward with a proposed plan. The eventual redevelopment of the site will involve many more steps to come, including a number of public meetings, before redevelopment would be set to begin. Any proposed redevelopment will include environmental and traffic studies to review potential impacts to surrounding properties and public infrastructure. Those studies are vetted with surrounding communities and review agencies, as well as the general public. The studies, depending on what land uses and to what intensity is ultimately proposed on the site, would help determine the what infrastructure is needed regarding access and potential impacts to the public. The study would also consider mitigation measures that would help reduce or even eliminate those impacts. As you heard during the June 13th City Council Workshop there were mixed opinions regarding a potential street connection to the north. There were even questions if connections to the west were considered to provide more viability to the site. What appeared to be a general consensus was for adequate pedestrian (trail) connections to the existing neighborhoods to the north and west of the study area to give residents the option to walk, run or bike to Central Park, the ECC, or Central Park Commons without having to travel around on existing public, and private, streets. I would welcome you to visit us at the August 16th Marketfest for continued dialogue regarding the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan. Staff would also be willing to consider a future neighborhood meeting to discuss the plan, but I would recommend sometime after a single concept is imagined for the area. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me, Jill Hutmacher or Erik Slettedahl with any questions regarding the Small Area Plan process. Again, I apologize for the tardy response to your earlier email. Respectfully, Mike Schultz <image001.png>Mike SchultzCity Planner3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122Office: 651-675-5650https://www.cityofeagan.com From: John Sealey <jmsealey@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 8:44 PM To: City Council <CityCouncil@cityofeagan.com>; Mike Maguire <MMaguire@cityofeagan.com>; Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> Cc: Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com>; Andrew Pimental <apimental@cityofeagan.com>; Jared Flewellen <jflewellen@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Re: Oslund Timberline Complaint Submission - (Northwest Central Commons) Hello, Adding City Planner Mike on this reply all since I never received a reply back to my below email. And my invitation which was extended out to come visit our Timberline Oslund neighborhood was completely ignored. Mike, are you the proxy for everyone on this list? I see you’ve been answering all requests from our neighborhood. Excuse my ignorance, but why is this? Is this protocol for the city? And how come I never got an answer to my email? We are very concerned constituents who vote for the elected officials. And our neighborhood is being directly impacted by this plan. You will continue to see an increase of emails, surveys, calls and in person presence in the upcoming meetings. Are you able to provide documentation to us that all emails, letters, calls, digital messaging is in fact being passed on to the council as it’s being stated to us? I also have the Timberwood Senior Community partnering with us. I look forward to a reply, at least an acknowledgement. Sincerely, John Sealey On Jul 27, 2023, at 11:01 PM, John Sealey <jmsealey@yahoo.com> wrote: Dear City Council & Mayor Maguire, Hello, my name is John Sealey. My family and I (Wife, 3-year-old daughter, and 1 year old son) live in the Eagan neighborhood of Osmund Timberline (8 years) on Pine Ridge Dr. I also grew up in this same neighborhood. Being a lifelong Eagan resident, I am writing to hopefully share my small civic duty and opinion to the City Council in regard to the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan. My parents have lived in the Oslund Timberline neighborhood as well for 43 plus years on McCarthy Rd. And are still living in the house I grew up in. I wanted to share this context to show who we are, that we are invested, engaged constituents of Eagan that live here because we have a safe, quiet, established neighborhood that is very concerned about the proposed "North access roadway" that would connect our neighborhood to the new redeveloped site of Unisys, & Delta. This current road proposal lacks any visibility to the general public or awareness unless you really understand the three map proposals, and or listen to the June 13th special city council meeting where it is called out. It’s not called out in the Sun Current article, in the surveys, and not called out in the Eagan newsletter which arrived this week. That is very misleading. You are using buzz words such as “accessibility roads” but not clearly stating in any written form about a North Road access. This vacant lot is located on Red Cedar Rd. Between addresses 1480 Red Cedar Rd, & 1470 Red Cedar Rd. This is about 100 yards from our house. This proposed shortcut by Bolton and Menk consultant group is not needed. My main focus point comes down to safety. Safety for children, families, and older people who reside in our neighborhood. It could be upwards to 14,000 cars a week going off quick data extrapolation. That is not safe for any neighborhood. Our neighborhood including the Obrien’s who live directly next to this site have grandchildren over all the time. Residents on Pine Ridge Dr. have younger kids who would be at a much higher accident risk should a new road be dropped in. I can count 9 households alone which have kids ages 9 and under along our street. This neighborhood has many families with children. We all play in our front yards, driveways, street, and backyards. Also, the vacant lot is used as a green space for kids to play at as well. Our neighborhood has never been connected to the ECC. It’s worked out well. Plenty of us have ECC memberships, use the splash pad, go running over there and have always used the current roads to drive there. Plus, this new development isn’t really adding any value to our neighborhood. It’s not like a new playground is being built, more green playing area, large scale trails, additional splash pads, etc. It’s commercial, limited retail, more residential which if it’s rentals would lower our property value. None of that is value add for us. It just isn’t. Plus, we potentially would have to pay more on taxes for new roads! I find it very alarming, and honestly a bit insulting that Bolton and Menk are so casual about saying this road connection is needed. 2022 Fall/Summer during the Lone Oak Rd construction, numerous cars cut though our neighborhood via McCarthy Rd, and or Pine Ridge Dr to avoid the detour. Guess what? Residents had to call into the police department to report numerous speeding cars. So, John Gorder City Engineer requested Eagan Police Traffic Enforcement to increase patrols and installed speed signs. This is documented. This will be the same issue should a new road be built. Only it’ll be permanent. Our neighborhood doesn't need or want direct access to this new site via vehicle. We can simply drive out to Lone Oak Rd, go down to Pilot Knob Rd and enter. Or take the private rd. via Timberwood Trail to Towerview Rd through the senior community. Have you thought about how it will impact them? They didn’t realize this was being talked about until we informed them. It's literally a 3-minute drive from using currents roads from out address. Plus, a big point which hasn't been talked about is if a connection is made via the cause way via Pine Ridge Dr. to Lone Oak Rd, you're basically closer to highway 13. And you’re assuming people are going to take a left to highway 13. Most people coming to this area to visit Pilot Knob Park, or the new area would want to enter and or to exit where they came from via Pilot Knob Rd. Which they then could go North to the intersection of Pilot Knob Rd and Lone Oak Rd stoplight. Then decide to go west to highway 13, straight to 494, or east to 35E. Also, creating a shortcut to make it convenient for people who might be running late to their kid’s youth programming, rugby events, and for residents who A) don't even live in Eagan, B) aren't even currently living in that area, C) renters who by attrition come and go, is pretty sad. It's also creating an inconvenience for us, who take pride in ownership, lived in Eagan for years, pay taxes, and support the city. Adding this shortcut would create heavy two-way vehicle traffic during events, market fest, and especially Fourth of July. As we are in close proximity to the launch site. This is a nightmare scenario. Retail, and restaurants have late closing hours. Which means, new late-night traffic by employees, patrons who have been drinking, and ride share companies would be using this shortcut all hours of the night. That’s not fair to nor is it safe for our neighborhood. We live in the suburbs to be in quiet neighborhoods. I’m saying NO to any new road. The new development can sustain not having a northern road. Delta and Unisys had high traffic and a high volume of cars for years which would equate any comparable numbers for future build out and didn’t have any issues. I invite you to come out to our Neighborhood and take 15 minutes of your time from your calendar to walk and talk around this area to view in person. Taking direct in person feedback from myself or others. Or setting up a date and time at the ECC exclusively for our neighborhood to come and give direct feedback to you and the project team. Or you setup a pop up in our neighborhood. Not at market fest or at Pilot Knob school from children who may not even live in this area. Everyone is upset, and don’t want this. It is very clear that no direct in person feedback has been sought from our neighborhood that is basically the only area which is directly impacted by this proposals/North Road creation. That’s concerning. Lastly, I’m doing my best to educate and mobilize our neighborhood going forward to have others step up and show their presence on this matter. I’m guessing we have 500 residents alone who don’t want a new through way street created. Which would negate the small sample size that Bolton and Menk accumulated for their survey. Thank you for your time and consideration. I’ve been following this subject via city council meetings, participating via email, and attending meetings in person, and through the digital survey in regard to this project. I hope this lengthy email resonates to each one of you on the council. I would safely assume none of you would want this to happen where you live and can understand where this passion comes from. It comes from caring about the safety of our kids, families, and keeping this neighborhood quiet as it is now. Best, John & Bridget Sealey 3046 Pine Ridge Dr. Eagan, MN 55121 651.491.0313 On Aug 17, 2023, at 1:19 PM, Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com> wrote: Mr. Mulrooney, Ashleigh forwarded your email to me. I am the project lead for the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan. The land located between 1470 and 1480 Red Cedar Road is public right-of- way owned by the City of Eagan. Public property is not subject to adverse possession claims. Regarding the small area plan, I spoke to several of your neighbors at Market Fest yesterday evening. I explained that the plans are currently in concept stage. We are collecting public feedback on all elements of the concepts, and will be sharing with the City Council that the Oslund Timberline neighborhood is opposed to road and trail connections to Central Park. Your email and my response will be shared with the City Council. The City Council will meet on Tuesday, October 10, 5:30 pm in the Eagan Room at City Hall to discuss results from public engagement and the draft preferred plan. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Jill <image001.png> Jill Hutmacher Director of Community Development 3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122 Office: 651-675-5653 https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Patrick Mulrooney <pmulrooney5@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 1:09 PM To: Ashleigh Sullivan <asullivan@cityofeagan.com> Cc: Patrick Mulrooney <pmulrooney5@gmail.com> Subject: Development of Delta/Unysis property--Note from Garrett Mulrooney (Red Cedar Rad Hi Ms. Sullivan— Enclosed is a letter my father and longtime (1978) Eagan resident (and former City Planning committee member) wrote regarding the upcoming meeting regarding the development of the Delta/Unysis properties behind the Central Park. He has offered some ideas to be considered and hopes you can disperse this note to the Council members. Thank you for disseminating this note interested parties. Patrick Mulrooney (son) Letter to the City of Eagan - Northwest Central Commons Development - Resident Engagement I am Garrett Mulrooney. I have enjoyed my residence in Eagan since 1978, and my experience as a member of the Eagan City Planning Commission some years ago. As may be indicated on original documents pertaining to what was in the late 1960s known as the Timberline development, there is space between my home at 1470 and Dan O'Brien's home at 1480 Red Cedar Rd, immediately to the west of the space to the "vacant lot." Dan and I have maintained that property since the late 1970s up to, and including just this week, which involved the mowing and preserving of the good looking, unobstructed view and unobstructed usage that embraces the immediate southern boundary of Red Cedar Rd and Pine Ridge Rd. In view of our history with reference to the vacant lot, I believe that a principle known as "adverse possession" would apply to encompass that "possession" involved in the Mulrooney and O'Brien adjacent property. I am not so sure how far along the planned development is for what would involve the northern portion of the conceptualized plans described as the Northwest Central Commons development. In my enthusiastic estimation, it would not be a good idea to involve access from the proposed property to thereinafter include the vacant lot so to have an unfortunate usage of that property that would otherwise interfere with the quiet enjoyment of the vacant lot in the Mulrooney / O'Brien possession. So, I just wanted to get my ideas across early on so that our interest and property use possession is on the record for the development of the property south of Red Cedar Road and southern edge of the property as it embraces what today has been occupied by Delta and does warrant reconsideration of its use. I submit this respectfully and thank you for your consideration and good wishes as Eagan continues to develop its otherwise major qualities. Very truly yours, Garrett E. Mulrooney Resident (612) 720-6340 citycouncil@cityofeagan.com mmaguire@cityofeagan.com From: Gessner, Jennifer <jgessner@stthomas.edu> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 1:23 PM To: Paul Bakken <PBakken@cityofeagan.com> Subject: North Access Development Petition Hello Council Member Bakken, My name is Olive Gessner (12 years old) and my sister- June (10 years old) and I attended a city council meeting in June with our parents and our little sister Amma (6 years old) about the North Central Commons development plans. We were very worried about a road being built through our neighborhood on Pine Ridge Rd and so we have been working all summer to share information with our neighbors and started a petition to oppose the north access plan. We have worked really hard on this project all summer and even won a 4-H Reserve Champion Award at the Dakota County Fair! I qualified to bring my project to the State Fair too, but June won’t be able to compete because she’s not old enough. We will be attending the meeting tomorrow with our parents and are excited to show the petition to the Council and hope that you will take it into consideration when making plans for the development. We really like that our neighborhood is safe and we can ride our bikes and play outside with the neighbor kids without having to worry too much about getting hit by a car (even though our mom still worries sometimes.) We are afraid that a big road will make it a lot more dangerous for us and our friends. We are really nervous about speaking in front of everyone, but our neighborhood friends and our parents all say that we are going to do great because we care so much about it. We wanted to send the letter we shared with our neighbors and copy of all of the signatures we got for our petition. Right now we have 60 signatures to share all from people who live right in our neighborhood. We hope to see you tomorrow during the 6:00pm listening session. Please let us know if you have any advice or suggestions for us speaking tomorrow. Thank you, Olive Gessner, age 12 June Gessner, age 10 Jennifer Gessner Program Manager, e-Fest and Schulze School Programs Schulze School of Entrepreneurship Opus College of Business Let's Connect! Schedule a Meeting with Me. jgessner@stthomas.edu Office: 651-962-4404 Mobile: 612-250-4160 University of St. Thomas | stthomas.edu Dear Oslund-Timberline Neighbors, My name is Olive and I am 12 years old. My sister June is 10 years old, and we live with our family on Loon Lane. We moved here in 2020 and have made lots of friends and have so much fun playing in our yard, the cul-de-sac, and biking and scootering around the neighborhood. We are reaching out today because the city of Eagan is looking at options to expand the road at Pine Ridge and Red Cedar Rd. We think this is a bad idea and think it is unsafe to have a big road going through our neighborhood. Because there are no sidewalks, we are worried that it will be too dangerous for us to go for walks or play with our friends in the neighborhood. We went to the city council meeting in June and learned that they have three options for the development of the area that has Unisys, Delta and all of the parking lots. All of the plans include making a road at Pine Ridge that goes all the way through to Lone Oak. We also learned that they are still in the planning phases, so this is the best time to step in and voice our concerns. We have made a petition that we are going to share with the city council to let them know a lot of our neighbors do not want the lot to be turned into a road. If you agree that the north access is not a good idea, will you please sign our petition and voice your opinion? We will take all of the signatures to an upcoming open city council meeting and both June and I are planning to speak during the open Q&A/feedback time to let the city council know about our concerns. We have included information from the city of Eagan website and some of the development plans they shared during the meeting. We’ve also included the contact information for all the council members and mayor if you’d like to contact them personally. Our mom says the more people that voice their opinion, the more likely they are to listen to us. Thank you so much for listening to our thoughts, please sign below if you agree with us. Olive and June Gessner (our mom’s email: jljanss@yahoo.com) From: amy kainz <dakainz@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 12:03 PM To: Gary Hansen <garyhansen1960@yahoo.com>; Gary Hansen <garyhansen84@outlook.com> Cc: kainzbb <kainzbb@gmail.com>; Mike Maguire <MMaguire@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Accessibility and my neighborhood Hi Gary, I have a few email addresses for you so I hope one of these finds you well. Just to refresh your memory, I have meet you through SDSU activities and at various Eagan events. I was the one who contacted you about the walking path from the Central Park playground to the stairs at Unisys and how it’s challenging when using a walker, scooter or wheelchair. I am excited this area will be developed so I hope to have more options to explore Central Park and the community center area. Plus maybe shopping, new businesses and new neighbors. With all of this new development and being a resident of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood community, please don’t extend Pine Ridge Rd. My biggest concern is safety for many reasons. My service dog, Rebel and I roll this area almost daily when the weather allows. We love walking the streets in our neighborhood and visiting with neighbors. We often go through Pilot Knob park either to Central Park or the great trail behind Pilot Knob Elementary. I love that I feel safe and less vulnerable and able to cruise around without another human. This is an independence I am not able to experience anywhere. If this road is developed, traffic will obviously increase immensely on Pine Ridge and be dumped onto Lone Oak Rd which is a two lane road adjacent to an elementary school. I previously lived at 3506 Coachman Rd near the city maintenance facility. While I loved our house and neighbors I hated the busy road especially when my children were little. When multiple sclerosis became more debilitating to my body and I knew a wheelchair would be part of my future, we knew we needed to leave our split level home. We were thrilled to find our current home in this quiet neighborhood and near our kids elementary school. I knew this was a nice neighborhood but didn’t realize all of the benefits until we moved in and I transitioned to a wheelchair. Please consider other ways to develop this large space without disrupting my neighborhood. Thanks for considering, Amy Kainz 3045 Cherrywood Ct From:Jill Hutmacher To:Sharon B Subject:RE: Pine Ridge Dr. , Northwest Central Commons Date:Monday, August 21, 2023 4:42:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Mr. and Mrs. Bruce, thank you for your comments on the Northwest Commons Small Area Plan. They will be shared with the City Council. Jill Jill HutmacherDirector of Community Development3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122Office: 651-675-5653https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Sharon B <sltpac1@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 8:21 PM To: Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com> Cc: City Council <CityCouncil@cityofeagan.com>; City Clerk <CityClerk@cityofeagan.com> Subject: RE: Pine Ridge Dr. , Northwest Central Commons Dear Mayor Maquire, Jill Hutmacher and Council Members, We have lived on 1496 McCarthy Road for over 37 years and are very concerned about the possibility of turning Pine Ridge Dr. into a through street. In your positions you have taken on the challenging, frustrating, albeit satisfying, rewarding and very admirable role to do what is best for the citizens of our beautiful city of Eagan. We are asking you to please take into consideration all the negative repercussions of turning Pine Ridge Dr. into a through street. There are a multitude of solid reasons for this request! With so many families actually walking IN the streets of this quiet neighborhood, with so many children playing, walking to school and riding bikes all ON these neighborhood roads. It would truly be a serious risk and safety issue to have a thorough street in this neighborhood. Also people often move to this neighborhood for these exact reasons. Removing these benefits of living here would take away much of the desirability thereby lowering property values, resulting in less tax revenue for the city from here. Cyclist riding down Lone Oak Rd. would also then have to cross a dangerous area formed by this plan as they go through the Lone Oak/Pine Ridge cross street. We are greatly concerned that in all these circumstances there is a considerable and likely chance that a child or adult may get seriously injured or even killed from the unnecessary new traffic caused by a through street on Pine Ridge Dr. We just can't afford to risk this happening! We trust you! We are counting on you to take this matter to heart as you consider this detrimental through street proposal. Please do not let it happen. Please do not damage our neighborhood! Thank you for taking the time to read this. May God bless you and guide you as you make this challenging and yet logical decision. Larry and Sharon Bruce Alyssa, At this time staff is allowing the public engagement process play out and to date as we’ve engaged with over 1,000 residents both in-person and digitally. We had many conversions with community members at our engagement event on July, 19. The digital survey will remain open through Sunday, August 20, and all residents, including those who live in the neighborhood, are invited to join us for another public engagement event on Wednesday, August 16 at Eagan Market Fest from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. The City Council has set a clear goal to make sure our engagement opportunities are open to all residents in Eagan as we plan this area's future. The current concepts presented are intended as conversation starters that are helping connect ideas and shape our community’s vision into a plan that helps Eagan thrive, now, and into the future. Please encourage your neighbors to join us on August 16, or if they haven’t done so already fill out the survey at cityofeagan.com/central-commons. All comments and data points from the survey will be presented to both planners and the City Council. Thank you again for providing your voice in the process! Mike Schultz Mike Schultz City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122 Office: 651-675-5650 https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Alyssa Rubenstrunk <alyssa.rubenstrunk@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 10:21 PM To: Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Dr. extension/Northwest Central Commons redevelopment Hi Mike, Thanks for your response and providing all the details. This helps me get a better idea of the timeline of it all. In regards to your response that staff would be able to discuss with my neighborhood, I think this would be a good idea. While I'm not leading this effort, I would like a chance to try to reach out to two individuals who have already sent fliers throughout our neighborhood. Can I ask who would be in attendance? Where this would be held and what time of day? Also, what is a good timeline? Ideally we'd like to have this feedback considered before the final design concept is established. With school starting and notifying the neighborhood, I think early/mid September would be ideal. If its easier to discuss my questions via phone, feel free to call me at 612-730-1683. Thank you, Alyssa Rubenstrunk On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:35 AM Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> wrote: Alyssa – I see the discrepancy now. I think what happened is that one concept kept the street network layer on for what lies outside of the concept area, which likely used platted right-of-way, which there is platted ROW from Red Cedar Road to the Delta property. Below is an aerial of that portion of the neighborhood, you can see the area between the two homes that is platted as right-of-way. The other concept drawing left the street network off, which makes it appear the road is not proposed. Regarding your question when this information will be provided to the neighborhood will be dependent on when the property is purchased and when the developer comes forward with a plan. But I’ll try to provide a very rough guesstimate of the time: October/November – Small Area Plan (SAP) adopted by City Council • 1 Quarter/2Q 2024 (this is assuming significant interest in the property) – Developer proposes a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment amending the land use from Major Office likely to a Mixed Use designation (again assuming the developers will follow the mix of land uses shown on the SAP) o This application is approximately 6 to 12 months (much of this is dependent on preparing the environmental study noted below) o The application will first be considered by the various Commissions (likely Planning and Parks Commissions)  Public notification is given, including notification of property owners within 350 feet, development signs posted on the property, newspaper notification, and posting on the City’s website  Public comments are accepted at the Planning Commission public hearing o City Council action will only be to direct staff to submit the land use amendment to the Metropolitan Council for acceptance, or to deny the request o The Met Council will require an environmental study (either an EAW/EIS or an AUAR, both involve some level of a traffic study) o The environmental study is made available to the public for review and comment. The document is also distributed to surrounding communities, Met Council, Dakota County, Environmental Quality Board, and other reviewing agencies for review and comment o Acceptance of the environmental study is dependent on impacts, or conditions that mitigate anticipated impacts (e.g. adding traffic signal(s), road improvements, wetland mitigation plans, etc.) o Met Council will ultimately need to accept the land use change before the developer can submit the next round of applications • If the above environmental study is accepted and the land use amendment approved, the applicant can submit the Rezoning request, Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision (this step is generally 60 days, however, it could be extended to 120 days depending on the information needed by staff) o A public hearing is set at the Planning Commission (same as noted above for the first step), public comments are accepted by the Planning Commission and considered as part of the action. o After Planning Commission action (regardless of recommendation of approval or denial), the matter is forwarded to the City Council o The original Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment is married up with the Rezoning, Pre. PD, and Pre. Subd. applications o Residents are welcome to attend the City Council meeting to again comment on the proposal o Council determines to approve or deny all of the development applications o City Council will usually establish a “term” for the approved Planned Development, usually 2 to 3 years, but could be longer due to the scale of the project (e.g. I believe the term of the Viking Lakes project is 10 to 15 years) • The last step is a Final Planned Development and Final Subdivision o The last step may be phased over the course of the project as each portion of the site develops o If phased, the Final PD must be substantially compatible with the Preliminary PD, if not an amendment is required a public notification is again given to surrounding property owners • Demolition of the building or buildings could commence at any time, but likely to occur after entitlements given with Rezoning and Pre. PD, but the developer makes that determination • Grading and Construction could happen as early as Spring/Summer 2025, but again, dependent on the overall interest in the property and the above actions. Staff would be happy to discuss with you and the neighbors further, either at the August 16th Marketfest event, or separately. Let me know if you have any questions. Mike Mike Schultz City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122 Office: 651-675-5650 https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Alyssa Rubenstrunk <alyssa.rubenstrunk@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 9:57 PM To: Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Re: Pine Ridge Dr. extension/Northwest Central Commons redevelopment Hi Mike, I appreciate your quick response. While I do understand its early in the process, its important to bring up our neighborhoods concerns now to take this into account with the development of this plan. Even though its a long process, I know once a plan is made, it can be difficult to change. Due to the plan still getting feedback and a traffic study not being done, I understand that some of my questions you cannot answer, however, all of my question, myself and neighborhood will want reponses on. For the time being, would you be able to share with me a rough timeline, in particular when a traffic study will be conducted, and when this will be publicly available? Lastly, I'm attaching some photos for clarification. The first is a screenshot of the survey image, which is the same as the Eagan webpage. Second is the image from the August/September 2023 Experience Eagan magazine, this one does not have a road through Pine Ridge Ridge. Thank you, Alyssa Rubenstrunk On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:18 PM Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> wrote: Ms. Rubenstrunk – I am the City Planner for Eagan and I am responding on behalf of Jill and Erik. First, I want to thank you for your comments regarding Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan and the three concepts that were presented to the public at the July 19th Eagan Marketfest (a second public outreach will again occur at the August 16th Marketfest). Your comments will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration in this matter. The three concepts were derived based on early conversations with City Council, City staff, and the general public. The concepts were intentionally varied regarding land use (i.e. residential, office, retail, etc.), intensity, road networks, and impacts to Central Park to instigate conversations with the public. Staff understood that some aspects of the concepts would be less popular than others, but wanted to hold those conversations with residents. The intent of the public outreach is to gather this input and move forward the various aspects that will generate a singular concept. The final concept is to provide a guide for future redevelopment of the property, understanding that new development may require changes or modifications once more detailed plans and information are provided. The Small Area Plan is intended to serve as guide for future purchasers and developers of the property and is only the first step in what will be a long review process to redevelop the properties. Addition mandatory steps (e.g. reguiding and rezoning the property, review of development plans and plats, etc.) will involve notification to residents inviting them to attend and comment on development proposals during public hearings. The redevelopment of the sites will also likely require an environmental study that will include traffic counts (ADT) and a traffic study of the area, but that cannot occur until the mix and intensity of land uses is determined for the site. It is premature at this time to involve a traffic study until a final concept plan has been determined and a development proposal is presented for the properties. Regarding your comment on the inconsistencies of the three concept plans. The three concept plans have remained consistent since being presented to City Council in June. Staff notes that one version of the three concepts has the external road networks outside of project area left off of the drawings, which may be causing some issues? The two concepts, Central Park Village and A Park Runs Through It, both illustrate a connection to the north. If you have any questions please feel free to email or call me at the number provided below. Respectfully, Mike Schultz City Planner Mike Schultz City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122 Office: 651-675-5650 https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Alyssa Rubenstrunk <alyssa.rubenstrunk@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 4:51:20 AM To: Jill Hutmacher <jhutmacher@cityofeagan.com>; Erik Slettedahl <ESlettedahl@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Pine Ridge Dr. extension/Northwest Central Commons redevelopment Hello Jill and Erik, I'm reaching out about the Northwest Central Commons area redevelopment plan. I live in the Oslund neighborhood and directly on Pine Ridge Drive where a new continuation of this road is proposed. To be honest, the neighborhood is not happy and will be opposing this. For myself, I want to get some more background on this before reaching out to the mayor and city board with my opposition. 1. What is the purpose of this road? Why is it necessary? Are there alternative options? From the concept drawings, it seems there is already a few options in and out of the development, one being Tower Road in which is in a very close range already of Lone Oak. 2. Has there been a traffic study done to the area? If not, when will this be taking place and what is the estimated time for the results? 3. What is the current ADT of Pine Ridge and Red Cedar Road? What is the estimated/projection ADT with this new proposed extension/connection of the road? 4. With the increased ADT, what is your plan to ensure the safety of the neighborhood and its residents? Is there a plan for sidewalks to be added to Pine Ridge Drive and Red Cedar Road? If so, will the residents be paying for this, or is this included in the project cost? 5. Understably this is in the development phase yet, however, if a road is being proposed in my neighborhood, why has the City of Eagan, or your consultant Bolton & Menk not done engagement with the Oslund neighborhood as part of the project community engagement requirement? 6. I'm seeing some inconsistencies in some of the drawings from the survey, website, and Experience Eagan magazine, particularly in "Jobs on the Park." The webpage and survey image shows the new proposed extension of Pine Ridge Drive, however, it does not go through to the new residential development. The Experience Eagan magazine does not show any extension of the road (or even the road itself). Can you please clarify which is correct? I look forward to your response and these items on behalf of the City of Eagan. Thank you, Alyssa Rubenstrunk Good Afternoon Mike and City Council Members - Thanks Mike for your response. I'm sure it is a similar response that you are offering any in my neighborhood that has concerns about a potential Pine Ridge road through to your large development. I think you will understand the real life impact if you want to come to my neighborhood at night and take a walk around "the loop" - it is a dream. I'd be happy to host you and any of your co- workers/City Council for an evening walk. I'm aware it is an odd request but you will get a real life impact feel vs. the surveys/charts/studies you speak of that do not always take a empathetic approach of - "how would I feel if my family lived here". I believe this will be excellent data that that offer you a human perspective of my/others' concerns. Again, let's discuss an empathetic approach (these are the leaders I fully admire)... I offer empathy right back at you. I'm a business owner in St Paul - I logically get the financial interests/impact of having a road through on Pine Ridge to the very large development. Sometimes though it's not about money, it's about compromising, it's about caring about the concerns of those you may negatively impact. There is no positive outcome a road will have on our neighborhood - you will understand that more after an evening walk in our quaint community. Now - perhaps a bike path - that would be an excellent compromise and will assist with linking up the new upcoming trail on Lone Oak - that would make sense for everyone. Let me know when you are interested in an evening walk - most nights we are free. Would love to meet you and others. Thanks, Crystal Frank-Shannon 1502 McCarthy Road 651.356.4838 Mike Schultz <mschultz@cityofeagan.com> To:fracry@yahoo.com Thu, Jul 27 at 1:40 PM Ms. Frank-Shannon - I am the City Planner for Eagan and I am responding on behalf of the City Council. First, I want to thank you for your comments regarding Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan, your feedback is important to help shape the plan as it moves forward. Your comments will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration in this matter. The Small Area Plan is intended to serve as guide for future purchasers and developers of the property and is only the first step in what will be a long review process to redevelop the properties. Additional mandatory applications (e.g. reguiding and rezoning the property, review of development plans and plats, etc.) are required before development would commence. These steps involve notification to residents inviting them to attend and comment on development proposals during public hearings. Additionally, the redevelopment of the sites will likely require an environmental study that will include a traffic study to determine traffic impacts, feasibility, and possible road improvements to mitigate traffic. However, that will not occur until the ultimate mix and intensity of land uses is determined for the site. The three concepts that were presented to the public at the July 19th Eagan Marketfest (and again at a second public outreach scheduled for August 16th Marketfest) were derived based on early conversations with City Council, City staff, and the general public. The concepts were intentionally varied regarding land use (i.e. residential, office, retail, etc.), intensity, road networks, and impacts to Central Park to instigate conversations with the public. The intent of the public outreach is to gather this input and move forward the various aspects that will generate a singular concept. This helps inform potential brokers and developers representing the current property owners of City land use parameters, scale, access limitations, and other issues and opportunities that arise through the planning process. It is not meant to provide specific design details as these will not be known until more detailed plans are proposed by a potential developer. If you have any questions please feel free to email or call me at the number provided below. Respectfully, Mike Schultz City Planner Good Evening - I would like to weigh in on Pine Ridge Drive and the intentions to create a major roadway into the gigantic project at the Northwest Central Commons. I moved into the Oslund Timberline neighborhood in 2021 with my family. We were thrilled when we got the opportunity to purchase our McCarthy home. The quaint neighborhood is a gem within the busyness of the surrounding bustling areas nearby. Most notable are the quiet streets, safe and peaceful vibe, and a well connected neighborhood. We are able to have our children safely play soccer on the streets without a car speeding by... we are able to clear our minds during a blessed morning walk... we are able to enjoy our home the way we intended when we purchased our dream home in a dream neighborhood. A major road through our quiet neighborhood into a large development would squash our dream home vision/reality and make it somewhere we dread living - just another place full of noise pollution and unsafe streets for children. Please do not take our dream home/neighborhood away from us. How can I help you find other solutions to your concern? Sounds like you are concerned there will not be sufficient access to the large development? How can you get your need met without ruining our beautiful neighborhood (imagine if tables were turned)? I know there must be a lot of pressure financially to make the development the best development possible AND I urge you to care about what you are trying to rob our neighborhood of to assist with those financial gains. Let's work together to come up with win-wins for us both. How can I help my community avoid Pine Ridge Drive being a major road into the development? Thanks, Crystal Frank-Shannon 1502 McCarthy Road From:Jill Hutmacher To:missicasey@gmail.com Subject:RE: Redevelopment Near Community Center Date:Wednesday, August 23, 2023 4:07:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Ms. Lang, thank you for your interest in the Northwest Central Commons Small Area Plan. Your comments will be shared with the City Council. Jill Jill HutmacherDirector of Community Development3830 Pilot Knob Rd | Eagan, MN 55122Office: 651-675-5653https://www.cityofeagan.com From: Melissa Lang <missicasey@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 10:17 AM To: Mike Maguire <MMaguire@cityofeagan.com>; Gary Hansen <GHansen@cityofeagan.com>; Cyndee Fields <CFields@cityofeagan.com>; Mike Supina <msupina@cityofeagan.com>; Paul Bakken <PBakken@cityofeagan.com> Subject: Redevelopment Near Community Center Dear Mayor McGuire and Councilmembers Hansen, Fields, Bakken and Supina, Thank you for investing the time and energy in surveying the public regarding thedevelopment of the vacant properties surrounding the Community Center. These vacancieshave given us an opportunity to make a very positive impact on the environment and thefuture of Eagan and I would like to see the city rework the proposals to incorporate moreenvironmental restoration efforts. Rather than focusing solely on development, the city should: • purchase the bluff and the Delta property and restore the Oak Savannah that itonce was, adding trails connecting to Four Oaks Road, the Community Center andPilot Knob park • allow for environmentally responsible new construction on the Unisys property, withmedium/high density housing and a small amount of retail/dining, but avoiding officespaces so we aren't facing this same problem in the future. • repurpose Argosy as high density housing. Many major cities have had great success in reducing carbon emissions by adopting greenbuilding regulations and planning green corridors through developed areas, while stillmaintaining fiscal prosperity. There are a number of environmental preservation grants andopportunities for partnership with an effort like this and it's something the people of Eaganwill support. Thanks for your time and consideration on this issue. Melissa Casey (36 year Eagan resident with children who plan to stay!) 3130 Alden Pond Lane Eagan, MN 55121 612-396-5946 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 1/78 Northwest Central Commons Area Survey Survey Results FINAL 08/21/2023 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 2/78 How oen do you visit the Northwest Commons area? Everyday 10% (71) A few times a week 30% (219) A few times a month 31% (231) A few times a year 27% (196) Never 2% (17) Which goals are most important to you? Select your top THREE goals. Creation of well-paying jobs 24% (170) Growth in city's tax revenue 23% (164) A more active and better connected park 72% (513) Housing choices for new and existing residents 21% (149) Sustainable and focused on environment 67% (477) A focus on walking and biking 69% (491) 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 3/78 Which of these considerations are most important to you? Select your top THREE considerations. Jobs 20% (138) Uses 51% (356) Parking 19% (133) Bluff 37% (261) Housing 17% (121) Connection 41% (288) Optimizing the Park 79% (555) Roads 13% (93) 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 4/78 Rank how much you like features of Jobs on the Park Question Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Prioritizing office and retail on the site 14%30%26%31% Having a low amount of housing on the site 39%28%15%18% The bluff isn't developed, but is privately owned 28%30%25%18% The Park does not change 36%33%22%9% The rugby fields stay where they are 26%47%21%6% Expand all /Collapse all Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Prioritizing office and retail on the site Having a low amount of housing on the site The bluff isn't developed, but is privately owned The Park does not change The rugby fields stay where they are 14%30%26%31% 39%28%15%18% 28%30%25%18% 36%33%22%9% 26%47%21%6% 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 5/78 Any additional thoughts or feedback on this concept ? Keep the open park space With many companies prioritizing working from home this seems like a huge waste of space. That combined with the medical office space makes it feel like a commercial space with a small park vs. a park with some offices around it . I don't see any difference between this and the current state and I worry the office spaces may be vacant like the current buildings. We don’t need anymore medical offices or offices here. Strongly against any sort of affordable housing development . We are seeing how this negatively effects the community through the Aster House. A waste of making the park better for the local community Least favorite City of Eagan needs high paying jobs like days of old not minimal wage, entry level. Need engineers and computer science and medical and manufacturing jobs. We have plenty of park space. Our population is aging so you need an excess of jobs as people retire in order to keep services stable. I would like the area of parkland to expand. Don’t care about rugby or more housing Indifferent about rugby fields I like the variety as it's likely to stand up over time More commercial with restaurants Too much housing and takes away the bluff. we do not need more apartment or townhome living structures, City has too many now. All three concepts appear to sacrifice event parking. Even though it’s only a couple of events per year, I think it will make the events less attractive to attend and will encourage people to illegally park on private property. This is already a problem at The Quarry Apartments. Don’t like dependence on corporate campus…seems a lot of companies are moving away from this, and even if you found someone, don’t know how long it would last . We have a LOT of empty buildings and land that has been developed already, why are we focusing on this parcel(s) of land?? Develop the Delta site into a Eagan cultural for the arts! Music, Theatre / Playhouse. With Restaurant pads and an open air park/ pavilion. Like the Ames Center, but better! For the Unisys property, Affordable housing ( something to support the lower income citizens supporting our retail in the area ) Would like additional retail, a variety. It would be nice to incorporate the bluff in a park setting. Another 62+ coop Please no more housing on Quarry Rd. It’s already congested enough with the 2 senior co-ops buildings, The Quarry Apts, plus ALDI, Canes, and hotel traffic. Eagan has other corporate campus sites that will also need to be redeveloped. Those might be better suited for a jobs focus, particularly the blue cross site. I don’t see a scenario within the next 10 years where we can attract three new corporate tenants to the delta site, blue cross and Thomson sites. I am mainly interested in the area that supports the farmers market and summer events. Also with the loss of several large businesses in the area, I do think we need to be thinking about replacement jobs I only like concept 3 as being balanced I appreciate the vision the city is having at looking to the future. I hope that vision takes into strong consideration the danger we are facing due to global warming. As we can see from the abandoned properties of Delta and Unysis, businesses come and go, trends change. Investing in restoration and preservation of the land we have le in Eagan will be far more valuable than building more structures that will just be abandoned eventually. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 6/78 I am not a fan of the loss of parking. Eagan needs to focus on building greenways Would be great to combine the western option of this plan with the increased park space on the eastern side from option #3. Option of single family homes similar to the neighborhood north of the development area? Build another grocery store because Eagan doesn't have enough. Adding a public pool would be a great asset None I'd like to see more trails. Also, keep the back Argosy parking lot . It gets filled up at different events and is definitely needed. I like as much natural land as possible, but having more companies based in Eagan is attractive. Build/develop infrastructure to help Eagan and its stakeholders survive climate change. Whatever is chosen, try and focus on an unique feature to promote/build/create. If using existing, go for the premier rugby fields in the midwest with amenities not found anywhere else in MN. Don't just enable another vapid, corporate approved, mixed-use site. (could be best rugby, ultimate frisbee, disc golf, business incubator/mall (mid-town global mkt). Of all the options, I guess this is the least intrusive option. We live in the townhomes overlooking the delta land. We already have so many multi unit housing already here. Traffic, noise, congestion will just get worse. Even this option is too many units for the space. Would love the city to buy more of this land and build a regional attraction that will bring people into existing retail and hotels already there, and bring in tax revenue from those visitors. We already have so many multi unit housing buildings already in the northwest corner of the Delta parcel. Adding more dense housing will bring more traffic, noise and congestion that we don't need. This is the ideal state with housing to a minimum and keeping the existing look and feel as much as possible. No Affordable housing, additional shelter space for unhoused folks. I think waiting for an occupant for the corp campus is risky. You just had two occupants leave. Buildings don’t get better sitting empty. I like leaving the bluff. The existing retail south of Central Park already looks flat and sort of ghost towny because nobody actually walks there - they just drive up to they stores and walk in. The bluff breaks up the view. It would be good to have a walkable neighborhood N/A Don't care about rugby Not in favor of this plan. I think Eagan has plenty of available corporate space (TR, BCBS), we do not need to plan another large site. I would love to see those existing sites occupied with employers offering high paying jobs. I like the idea of focusing on businesses in the area, which frees up amenities in the evening aer business hours for community use There is housing everywhere! And we have more jobs than workers right now. I'd advocate for enhancing the parks and green space. Can we even consider community gardens or something that will benefit the environment and combat climate change? We can't enjoy this space if it's too hot for us to be outdoors! It'd be amazing to do something different rather than just housing and restaurants, something that really makes a difference. Also thank you for seeking public input! I'd love a walkable city approach to future development , and this meets some of that vision with jobs, but not with housing. I'd prefer prioritizing citizens (people) over corporations. We also don't know what the future demand for corporate offices looks like. NO NEW ROAD CONNECTION THROUGH THE TIMBERLINE RESIDENTIAL AREA!!! [Note: Your map shows a road connection through Pine Ridge Drive in Timberline. It is interesting that this is not addressed in your planning survey! So much for full disclosure, transparency, and honesty in government .] 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 7/78 I’d like to see expanded community services as part of this plan. Specifically a sports dome or ice rink Ideally would have a walkable community. Feel like enough businesses are already around there Sports complexes needed in eagan! We have enough strip mall retail space already developed in Eagan. Much of this space is vacant . Concern for corporate use planning and what impact a delay of occupancy use would have on the city and overall project . Eagan has seen a drastic increase in empty offices and empty retail spaces recently, and setting aside this space for future job use may not be a sustainable decision. I am not sure how many people use the rugby fields. That is a great space. The bluff is beautiful. I like the idea of a live/work area. I don't think Eagan needs more parking, in general. I think density is good. I hope it's a place where people can bike to easily. we need more sit down restaurants in eagan especially breakfast and vegetarian options absolutely no to any opening or new road to the north . the connection statement is false as we living in the oslund timberline addition have plenty of access to the park area. We do not need to bound with anyone in the new project . It is only a five minute drive to the community center center. Also we can walk there with no problem. Towerview road can be extended straight up the hill past the tennis courts and reconnect straight out to pilot knob. Turn le on pilot knob and two blocks north you are at lone oak rd with access to any freeway. I appreciate the opportunity to do this survey but it is difficult to understand what you are asking on most of the questions. I am strongly against putting any new housing anywhere in this area unless was previously been zoned to allow it before this project began. While it wasn't offered as a priority choice, my preference would be for a plan that minimizes traffic throughout the area, keeps initial investment and ongoing service costs to a minimum, limits customer direct-access businesses to the Argosy location, and does not place additional burdens on law enforcement and social services. I am generally opposed to further development of this area. My property taxes have gone up over $1000 in the 8 years I've owned my Eagan home. Any development needs to not add to that constant upward pressure on property tax. A combination of walkable office, retail, restaurant , and green spaces would be wonderful. Please avoid giant paved parking lots. Provide people with places to live, work, and play. no housing or retail - plenty of space to renovate or recycle and use elsewhere Given the current/dominant hybrid work environment , the focus would need to be added retail vs. office. City to maintain bluff and charge business I don't think that investing in a corporate campus makes sense with hybrid work. I also don't like the limited housing in this plan. Not a fan of more retail Too much retail and abandoned office space in Eagan as it is. There is no need to develop office space when so much existing office space that’s empty. Also there’s enough new apts and townhouses going up around the city. Leave the Bluff as is. Please make sure that if the rugby field is moved, it is also developed properly. I like open parkland area. Less is more. Space is priceless Don’t like keeping a corporate campus. With the way businesses are treating HQ these days this doesn’t seem important to the area. If anything this would better suited to be smaller rentable short term office space for meetings for people who work from home Seems like balanced concept For us home owners near this development , I prefer more parks/bike paths and leaving as much as possible. Concerned about parking for events at community center like 4th of July and traffic through the roads. Is there anyway to incorporate a community use facility with an indoor swimming pool? 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 8/78 N/A We need walkable, mixed use buildings (ground level retail or housing) with 2-4 levels of housing above. Please! No more retail space. Jobs! I’d love more jobs. I know this will be very hard. I think Eagan has done an incredible job so far on mixing jobs, green space. Jobs will be hard to get to an office park. Have you considered having a nonprofit building in Eagan? A space where nonprofits could share common resources (conference rooms, meeting rooms, auditorium, etc) I am currently a leader of a nonprofit based in Eagan and would like to stay here, but I would predict that we will need more space when our lease ends. Our big dream is to have our own building where we could host our events, we currently set up our events at schools, run them for 2 days and then pack it up again. Having our events in Eagan would draw in hotel goers and restaurant business to our community. We need access to parking (such as exists at schools or in corporations), some food on site, small rooms and larger spaces. Eagan is changing from the city of trees into the city of multi family, dwellings and traffic. We don’t need any more housing, quit developing every single piece of land. NOT OPTIMUM USE OF THE SPACE TO SERVE THE WHOLE CITY. This is my least favorite concept . Creating office space seems risky--I feel many office developments have gone vacant , like around the Vikings headquarters, for example. Needs to be more walkable. Restaurants with walkability please! High-density housing is very much needed. We live at a townhome in Farnum Drive, part of the Four Oaks association. I am extremely concerned that this concept seems to eliminate our walking access to Lone Oak park through the site as we do now. My husband is a runner and this path is part of our daily life. It also seems to cut our walking access to the Central Park. We are both members of the fitness center and we also love to go there for events by walking through the path on Four Oaks. This concept seems to eliminate one of the best feature of where we live! We would like to keep the ability to walk through the old Delta site to access the walking path behind the school as well as Central park through the end of Four Oaks The city should consider how the campus could support School District 196 growth needs. Additionally, thought should be put into how the area could be redeveloped for a more robust community center to include raquetball, pickle ball, etc. the community center is nice, but ultimately does not have amenities equal to the size and need of the community as a whole. I like the park runs through it best We have empty corporate campuses nearby that haven't been filled. Please do not prioritize a new campus here. Fine but agree that finding a corporate campus taker is gonna be tough for awhile Not a good plan. I think it's largely oxymoronic to tear down a couple corporate office buildings just to build... a corporate office -oriented space in its stead. With Thomson Reuters and BCBS vacating some or all of their offices, companies that want to grow roots in Eagan already have excellent opportunities big and small to establish their base. Look at all that parking! What ?! The new apartments/townhomes would be built on a moderately busy road overlooking a sea of parking for the new home of Tech Company A? No thanks. Housing will continue to be a need as the population numbers continue to rise.. With covid, the work- from-home concept has become a permanent reality for many, which may eliminate the need for a large expansion of office space. I feel we have plenty of retail choices in Eagan. This town has a fabulous amount of parks, trails, and outdoor recreation opportunities, but the expansion of green spaces, parks, and walking/biking trails should be a priority as the population grows and will want more choices in natural recreation areas. I prefer this concept over the other three with the removal of the corporate campus...aren't most big corps moving to working from home environments...and having more housing on that site with additional parking. I could see housing on either side of that road, back to back with parking on the park side. I also would love to see more "boutique" restaurants in Eagan. I feel Eagan could be more of a destination spot with food / entertainment especially with being so close to the Airport / MOA and the Vikings Lakes area. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 9/78 Would like to see a dome for the community. Maybe a Hospital. There is no hospital located in the close vicinity of Eagan Finding a way to acquire the bluff as parkland dedication in lieu of fees should be considered so it is open and available to the public. I’m concerned on two fronts. One is lack of parking. When large events are held these isn’t enough parking now. This will make it worse. Another concern is impact on city services (police, fire, etc) with so much housing Do not build any connection to Oslund Timberline. No North Road access point . We have plenty of ways to get to the ECC. This will create a plethora of safety, traffic, nuisance issues in our neighborhood. We live in Eagan for a reason. Quiet , private, and our children are safe. I would like to see an adaptive park for disabled along with an interactive dog park. Brewery would be great and or business like Malcolm Yards. More park, and nature settings. More retail and green space but less housing -especially less apartments. Eagan is getting congested and we are losing too much green space. My worry is more housing will be rent controlled or low income and that will hurt our city even more than the housing already put in. Does not seem as feasible due to length of time it will take to get a corporate campus. Housing is a more immediate need. I like the idea of making the park a Greenway through the offices, retail and residential. Saving the bluff is important! This is once in a lifetime opportunity to retain beautiful land and preserve something that is irreplaceable. There are so many spaces farms, golf courses etc that have been buldozed into concrete, roads and homes that will never be back and I would like to see Eagan retain this space as something beautiful and enjoyable for all residents for many years to come. Think maybe a smaller theater of arts such as the Ames Theater on Nicollet Ave in Burnsville. it is a good size facility with ample parking but yet is not huge and/or offensive. Please consider no more houses, apartments or condos, life is so short let people emjoy the city in which they live. Our first responders (police, EMTs and firefighters} are busy all the time, I have lived in Eagan since 1976 and have extreme growth through that time, please slow down. The area surrounding the community center is vast and empty. There are lots of uses for it , one thing I do not want to see is retail/offices developed in the area. Town center exists, there is tons of buildings everywhere. More trees and paths running throughout the area is ideal. I think there are lots of things that should be done to the area but one of those is not retail buildings. It is important to maintain the size of the park for walking, picnics, gatherings Central Park Village is best idea No corporate buildings please. Expand the park with more walking and biking paths; perhaps more playgrounds. Honestly didn't even know if bluffs were there. There's a shopping district right next door. Unless you're really trying to make a small town downtown feel don't see the draw. Would rather see a higher housing density with like a cool downtown like Lakeville's or even something where it could be a cool place for street festivals and stuff. This is our one chance to give back to nature all that we have taken from it in the past 45 years of development in Eagan. PLEASE prioritize according to long term need and sustainability of wildlife and their FAST DISAPPEARING homes! Why not develop a community acreage for environmentally friendly spaces with learning opportunities about nature/sustainable prairies, etc. with learning center for children and adults. We have enough buildings and 'mixed use' space. This is our oportunity to DO something long term for wildlife and for ourselves. Why not reach out to Nature Conservancy just to get their ideas? Please!! I like the idea of less residential, this option seems well balanced. No Apartments. Build smaller homes not townhomes so people can afford a home. Under 2000 square feet 300-400 thousand. Too much retail/office/fast food in Eagan already. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 10/78 We do not need any more commercial office or retail office or apartment buildings. We need more green space. Stop building space that doesn’t get used. We have several empty strip malls and lots of empty office spaces so the last thing we is more. Make Eagan a destination for families again by prioritizing green space and parks. We frequent many parks in the twin cities and the community center park is very lacking. Yes, we do have woodhaven but that’s on the other side of the city and doesn’t have a splash pad. I plead that you do not prioritize tax revenue to build more building and retail space that doesn’t get used. Repurpose the other empty strip malls to generate that revenue. All of these plans are severely lacking and very disappointing to say the least . Would love more affordable housing. Not rentals, but actual affordable houses or townhomes. There is ample retail/food facilities, i We must make housing and public transportation accessible. I think Eagan does a good job so far, I watch the Council meetings and feel confident in the leadership, thank you. Also we may not need all the schools in the future. Not sure this is realistic given the decreased need for office space. Will there be workers to fill restaurant and retail jobs? Bluff isn’t developed is great to me but dislike private ownership Let’s keep Eagan a green place to live and play! multi use rugby fields would be good I think Eagan has done great work over the years in developing green space. The area around the Community Center has been built up so much, increased traffic and Im deeply concerned about the impact on the limited green space at the Community Ctr. Could the bluff be maintained and more park development be made out of the Unisys/Delta space since they are both already rather sequestered? Why are rugby fields a priority? Would not pickle ball courts be more useful to more citizens? nO We need more creative ways to drive well paying jobs in Eagan, this plan isn’t it . Yes, corporate office needs have been reduced, but certain types of companies require employees to be onsite. I don’t hunk this spot needs even fewer homes and less retail. You should figure out how to anchor this space off the existing invoice retail we have near by. Not sure I understand exactly what is meant by corporate campus, but I have a negative reaction. I don’t like the idea of more office space. I do like the idea of more retail. Parking concerns me for all the plans. Is it a given that the argosy lots will be densely developed into housing and office? Where is their parking? As the daughter of an existing homeowner on adjacent property, I would encourage inclusion of some kind of green space buffer area along the west and northwest side to allow some space between the areas. I also recommend not putting roads to the west to allow for privacy to these existing homeowners. Keeping retail and commercial use towards Pilot Knob also. I agree with developing connecting paths to the parks to enhance the usability and safety in this area. The land does need to be developed and increased tax revenue benefits all. Thank you. Try to incorporate an enhanced community center. Aer visiting several other city CC, Eagan’s CC is really disappointing. Eagan is a great city and the community deserves a great CC. Thanks for your consideration. Scott J Greer Don't like it . Keep Rugby fields available wherever they are located. Opposed to more housing. I like keeping the bluff and connecting the Quarry and Pilot Knob parks to the Central Park. I'm not antidevelopment , but I don't want the new development to be an anxiety inducing nightmare like trying to shop at the current retail area just to the south. If the development is well thought out and could maybe relieve some of the current retail congestion problems, that would be ideal. We don't need to add to the shopping demolition derby of this area. This is the best of the 3 plans Please minimize increasing housing/residential areas because of the negative impact on city services, traffic, lack of public transportation and just adding to the congestion and over- development of the area. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 11/78 Seems like we have other empty sites that could be used for jobs that are not connected to the part (BCBS, TR) so why not use this space to make Central Park walkable/bikeable and extend services that encourage people to get outside? Would prefer to see no housing, but if there has to be a housing component this option would be my preferred concept . To me, "Well Paying Jobs" and "Retail" do not go together. Technology development companies or manufacturing may offer higher paying job opportunities than retail. Would ideally like to see the bluff preserved, but in regards to office space: I only see the trend of remote/hybrid work increasing (I know some companies are forcing employees back in office but said employees are leaving those jobs for remote ones). Unless said office space is more of a coworking focus where companies and/or individuals can rent out space on an as-needed basis I see it being a poor usage of the space. As far as housing goes - I think it could be great IF the housing is more affordable. I love Eagan but I know I'm not the only one who will likely have to leave as the cost of housing is only increasing, making it less desireable to stay here. please do not change road access to lesser known neighborhoods around the park to keep them quiet and private I'm not a fan of the increased traffic; but even more disturbed that you are considering an option to disrupt our beautiful quaint neighborhood, wanting to connect Pine Ridge Drive to this massive construction project . Imagine you purchasing your dream home for your family - quiet , kids outside in the streets playing, safe, and a fabulous vibe threatened by the city wanting to make money off taking away those features from your family. Imagine how you would feel please. Please consider alternative options not through our amazing neighborhood, don't ruin our lovely set up. No longer my kids will be safe on the streets, the traffic and crime will multiply, and the reason we purchased our dream house will be gone. Vehicle access to Lone Oak Road through the Timberline neighbourhood is not wise as Pine Ridge Drive is lined with young families with small children creating a dangerous environment . Lone Oak is a busy commercial street . A through street at Pine Ridge drive will cause traffic backups on Lone Oak. More traffic in and around Pilot Knob Elementary school will cause additional backups on Lone Oak Road and create an unsafe environment for school children. The road connecting Pine Ridge Dr to the new development will drastically impact the quality of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood. I would not support any concept that includes this. disagree whole heartedly on "Jobs on the Park" !!!!!!!!!!!! NO LOW INCOME HOUSING!!!! There is a high need in Eagan for 55 and up housing. Many residents in this age bracket have lived in Eagan for over 30 years but are forced to leave their life -long community when they want to downsize into one -level living or a 55 and up community. Eagan should be mindful of this when developing new land areas. I dislike all plans presented? Why not make the entire area a park? Why the need to constantly cram high density apartments everywhere? Opening up the Oslund Timberline neighborhood via Pine Ridge Road is not necessary. This area is highly used by pedestrians - residents & nearby neighbors- especially children. Opening this up to increased traffic is dangerous & disruptive & will make the residents less safe. The current access has handled high traffic volume when Delta and Unisys occupied the space. This road access has not been pointed out very well & is seeming to fly under the radar - kind of sneaky. There is already increased traffic on Lone Oak & we can expect more with the upcoming changes to that road as well. Goodbye quiet safe neighborhood. Would like to see a change in the park, be innovative and not keep park as is. I like the idea of having more businesses like restaurants and retail to draw people in, but don’t like the idea of a corporate campus on site. Should remove some of the retail and housing to allow central park to connect directly to Pilot Knob Park. Also, a corporate office seems like a pipe dream when large employers are closing office campuses in the city. Feels crowded and parking will be a nightmare. I DO NOT want any North Road access entry into Oslund Timberline. Safety is the biggest concern. I can extrapolate data if needed to back up the safety issue surrounding any proposal for a road. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 12/78 Children's safety, pedestrians, dog walking, night running, number of new cars cutting through etc. Pass this to City Council. I will write this for any option. Thank you- Our neighborhood doesn't want this. You need to gather our feedback via coming to our neighborhood for a meeting, or setting up a date & time at the ECC exclusively for Oslund Timberline to share our feedback. I can say that all neighbors have been talking, and no one wants this. It's an emphatic NO from all neighbors. The idea of natural preservation and common, open areas is so important . Why does every square inch have to be developed??? People and families need walking, bike, performance spaces. We annually attend the Eagan 4 th of July festival and it is packed with multi generation families of every nationality. All your options would create less open space, not more. Deeply opposed to connecting public street to Red Cedar Rd. Bluff shouldn't be developed, but city should own it . I’m sorry, but before you think about anything else, please, please remove that eye -sore of a building on pilot knob, where Amazon was going in, had friends visiting from out of town and they even commented on it Keep everything as a green space. We do not need more commercial, retail, housing in the area. In all three plans you lose overflow parking at Argosy by developing the lost west of that building. Keeping it as part of park parking lots would make a lot of sense given how much traffic we can get for events. No housing. Retain the surface parking at the argosy campus If current office space is underutilized, it doesn't make sense to keep pushing office space. We have business that are closed or have moved due to lack of customers or people working from home and no need for office space. I see no reason to create more. Development keeps happening and wildlife habitat is disappearing. I vote for. Ore green space. Good for environment and our wellbeing Eagan needs a hospital I fully support the "A Park Runs Through it" concept . I think it 's a little bit of everything and expands the park a bit . This area, once developed will never be turned BACK into a park, so let's establish more park space (maybe even a dog park addition). while creating office space and housing. Looking at the concepts though, it is unclear if we will be keeping any of the existing Delta parking. I think we should try to keep a portion of that area as parking to accommodate the needs of the park and new housing development . Please do not ruin the timberline neighborhood with a road connecting it to the new development . It will create a decrease in property value and cause traffic. Do not want to lose green space or trees! I feel this plan has way too much commercial area in it . Eagan has a history of giving away the bank for commercial development . Emphasis on jobs too high. I'd rather see more housing for tax base and more park land. A well developed Adult Aquatic center would be a great addition to our community. We have plenty of water activities for children, but no place for Adult water activities. A nice lap pool and shallow swim pool for Aqua aerobics would fit nicely into the development . And a nice revenue generator. Adult aquatics would serve nicely for our growing senior population. I would prefer that the parkland is maximized while attracting employers to CURRENT buildings. NO HOUSING in this site. Maximize Eagan Community Center by building a POOL, a core missing element driving people to join other clubs. Eagan is awesome due to the parks keep it that way! No more high density housing !! I don’t like the idea of housing. I like a bigger park, maybe a community pool that’s cheaper than cascade bay, and more retail like the Central Park commons. Don't mind having a couple retail/ restaurant spots but don't want housing or corporate spots Save the park and make it better We don’t need anymore chain restaurants, chain retail stores, banks (my god please stop), grocery stores and overpriced luxury apartments that no one can afford. Enough is enough. Can Eagan have 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 13/78 literally anything unique? Leave the park as it is. What is so wrong about having parks??? No one can even afford to shop and dine right now. Eagan has a lot of ugly retail space (run down). It doesn’t need more. I like this concept best due to the fact it does not create a road on the north side going into the existing neighborhood to red cedar rd, This would put too much traffic into that neighborhood and the section of Lone Oak Rd that is in front of the school and where the bike/walking path with be. I feel strongly about not having the road go into that neighborhood. I live across Lone Oak Rd from the neighborhood. We do not need more multi living options. Praying we are not using prior developers as they have proven to not understand how people actually use what is/was developed. Need better parking up by the rugby fields for the sports that use this space. Having an indoor city pool would be nice. too much housing. need community areas. pool etc No more housing! Focus on green space and park. It’s what Eagan is known for. LEAVE THE PARK ALONE Less housing. Use the park for nature activities. While I recognize that Eagan is running out of land that can be developed the thought of more housing around this park is appealing. I would rather see a community pool and more biking and hiking trails Keep it as much a park and community gathering spot as possible and enhance with ideas that draw people there….small quaint coffee shop with benches….strolling paths…etc Eagan is rapidly growing and risks losing green space that is readily accessible to all residents. We need to prioritize keeping the park open and available for all and not on more rapid building. The amount of high density housing that has already gone up in Eagan in the last few years is alarming. The metcalf site is also of concern. Please consider expansion of more single family detached homes. There is also plenty of empty corporate space that is up for lease. Please preserve one of my favorite reasons for moving to Eagan, the green space. We don’t need more housing in Eagan what is here now is either over priced or section 8. When I moved to Eagan, I was drawn to how beautiful Central Park is. It is a nice slice of nature that is close by. It does not need to be developed into businesses or housing. There enough businesses in Eagan, most of which already do not have enough workers. I moved out of Highland Park in Saint Paul because it was turning into an overly developed area with Highland Bridge. Many remaining residents are not happy. I would hate to see Eagan make a similar mistake. I enjoy the open area when I go to the art fair, marketfest , or drive through the area aer work. There are plenty of other empty buildings within 3 miles to use for offices. No dense housing! That area aer the expansion of the Hyvee area has become very busy. One thing unique to Eagan, is and a smaller town feel with a good education system. I think to preserve that feel, it’s important to keep spaces undeveloped. The city has an opportunity to create community in the existing space by leaving it as is. As someone who has lived in the Seattle area, land grabs have turned it into nothing but densely urban areas. Sustainable housing is an issue across the country, but adding more apartments simply attracts greedy landlords. We pay a lot in taxes, but doing this project simply for increasing tax revenue with no plan in sustainable housing doesn’t hit the mark I believe to justify. Don’t get rid of the last major open space in Eagan simply to attract more $ tax rev. Eagan is where I grew up, and where I found myself moving back to aer time away, because of it’s small town feel and quality education. We need open spaces to keep that . Dense urban housing as proposed simply creates traffic nightmares, without investment in building an infrastructure system that can handle it . Look at cedar/CR 42. I didn’t move to Eagan for our central community center to turn into that . Eagan does not need to lose anymore park space for useless retail and more housing. We need to utilize our land for useful thing for the community that are lacking like facilities such as a dome and park land and Sports complex. Sports complex and dome can be rented for income year round and used by community and can maintain park land too. Instead of more mass produced mass housing and retail just to see dollars, these are things that can bring money in but also invest in Eagan which is what has not been done for this city for a very long time. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 14/78 I like the opportunity for more green spaces. There are other empty office spaces that can be used. New apartments were just built as well. We are getting to much housing and office spaces. Keep our green spaces. If any housing is built I need to be affordable housing for people. Premium apartments do not help the community in any way Eagan already has plenty of commercial spaces available aer other organizations have relocated. Housing is also already dense, no need to make it more congested. Preserve or expand as much green space as possible. Eagan could use a 50m pool to compete with Bloomington and the future one in Apple Valley. A corporate campus will be difficult to find an occupant Strongly need parking. Just keep AS IS Keeping the park the same, perhaps enhancing some of its features (public pool), but NO THROUGH ROADS TO OSLUND TIMBERLINE NEIGHBORHOOD. The park's connectivity (bike/walking paths) should be maximized while limiting busy roads cutting through it . This layout keeps the park safe by having the road cut around the outside of the park. Also, housing should be limited because it will add to the traffic of the park. Commercial retail or office space would be better because it keeps the park quiet outside of business hours/weekends and still would provide parking for special events. Apartments don’t belong in the park we also don’t need retail in the park it devalues the park and makes it so the kids can’t play and people with no values invade the kid’s space. Would like better retail and restaurant and entertainment choices How about an arcade for the kids No more retail! Strongly against this development . Keep the area how it is and preserve existing neighborhoods as they are. The existing access points are fine as they are. No additional road access points are needed. Expand the patk Best of the 3 options, but just like all 3 there is no way you can build an access road into Pine Ridge Drive. This will completely disrupt our neighborhood. High density housing should be avoided as well for the same reason. O Keeping the space as green as possible is my goal. We have lived in Eagan for 17 years and slowly watched so many of the green spaces become developed. Some small, random woods and forest are lovely. I am all for keeping this as green as possible! No more high density housing. I know you're not doing an environmental impact study. I’m for anything that doesn’t create a ton of high density housing. We don’t need more housing or businesses we need more green space and parks. so sick of all the apartments and retail space and restaurants Would love a community pool option and more kid activity space No more houses and businesses! Do not add work spaces or housing. We don't need that . Adding to the park or leaving it as is is, in my opinion, the best option. We don’t need any more development! Keep green! No low income housing. Only business and park. This would greatly increase light pollution in the area, where there is already too much. Leave it as is Build activity center gym There is no guarantee a corporate campus will come to Eagan. Corporations are downsizing and already leaving this city, we cannot rely on this income. We should add to our park and create opportunities for actual low income housing to support our community. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 15/78 We love that there is no thru road to Pine Ridge Drive!!! We moved into that neighborhood because of the low traffic and crime!!! We need more community space - not more housing and corporate space. Put in tennis, pickleball, a community pool, outdoor education space. We moved to Eagan for it being family friendly. Please continue to improve this. Don't sell out to commercial and residential tax revenue. I don’t really care if the rugby fields are moved or not . Combining new housing with an old neighborhood (red cedar area) is just cold hearted. It would suit us better to have more green space. There is so much housing and average below average retail going in (see olive garden), do we really need more it's tacky Do not take away park features that ccurrently exsist (fields, market fest area where it is, walking paths were they are) Need to keep trees already there and increase trees greatly with anything new that does come in.) Driving access from Pine Ridge Drive should not be an option. No through street from Pine Ridge Drive. Do not agree with having access go thru Osland Timberline neighborhood. Quiet neighborhood doesn’t need or want traffic. City planners should actually talk to residents of this neighborhood and be honest about the impact . Terrible survey A little skeptical that office space will be occupied at an acceptable level for the next decade. Parking constraints are not addressed. I see in the picture that there is a new road connection on the north side to Pine Ridge Drive which would bring traffic into a neighborhood community which is a bad idea. 1) Northwest /Delta complex unlikely to attract owner, making this aspect of this plan DOA. 2) Like keeping bluff public as a significant natural feature; private ownership would permanently remove this public good forever. 3) Seriously disagree with insertion of tiny homes that overload demand on what will be a decreased public space. 4) Any assumption that homes will be less affordable in the future just by smaller size is likely to be wrong once actual future costs emerge. 5) Long range, the highest value of this land is the public park space that cannot be replicated. I really like keeping and making as much green space as possible, since land is a finite resource and once housing or businesses are on land it won't likely ever be a green space, and it is one of the great benefits of being a tree city and suburb that makes me want to live here Very concerned about restaurant/retail on the bluff. Also very concerned about how high the housing will be in the skyline. I live on Pine Ridge Drive right next to this development and I have many concerns about all these plans. I am a long-time resident of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood (25 years) and walk my dog daily around the neighborhood and park. I strongly oppose the building of the North Road through the Oslund Timberline neighborhood!!! This plan would dramatically increase traffic and noise in what has been a quiet and safe neighborhood. As I walk through the neighborhood, I see a number of new families with young children. I fear the increase in traffic would put their lives in danger. Keep ample parking, I prefer less housing & commercial areas, keep it green and open. Eagan already has too many vacant retail spots in strip malls, why add more? DON'T DEVELOP THE BLUFF! Do not have a connecting road from pine ridge to central park.. we like are privacy and security in timberline... Neutral. Doesn't matter to me. I'll defer to those who use the field. I live on the north side of the park and do not have any problems accessing the park. Please do NOT put a road into the existing neighborhood. That does not serve anyone well. I think that is what I see on each concept except for this one? I can't quite tell. We need to maintain as much green as we can and another road is not needed. I don't understand why you aren't connecting at Four Oaks Rd instead? That is a straight shot to Hwy 13 and includes a bike path already! This concept seems closest to current situation. What I don’t like is that it appears the plan doesn’t include individual homes. So many new apts have been added behind Argosy and in other areas of the city, I think new individual housing opportunities similar to Timberline neighborhood would be better suited. I also do not understand the need for a connection road by extending Pine Ridge Drive. Are you considering Extending Four Oaks Road? Towerview Road has served the prior activity sufficiently for many years when those campuses were vital. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 16/78 Not interested in having the disruption of a peaceful existing neighborhood destroyed by multiple factors. I would rather see new shopping/dining options than a new corporate campus. Specifically, I would love to see a Pizza Luce down here. It would be cool if there was a space for artisans or emerging retail stores to have booths/sections without the full responsibility of leasing a retail space. I think the Mall of America had something like this. I live in the oslund/timberline neighborhood which is directly behind the delta site. I strongly disagree with putting a through road into our neighborhood. Many of us have small children and pets who frequently play and walk the neighborhood. It would be extremely unsafe and it is completely unnecessary for access to lone oak. I think creating more Jobs is wonderful. I don’t think more apartments and/or townhomes are necessary. I would prefer to see single family homes if any residential dwellings are being considered. Strongly dislike the northern access road through Red Cedar. It is not entirely clear why you need a northern access road that parallels an already useful Pilot Knob Road. If a northern access wasn't needed when those three businesses were at their peak, then why would it be needed when most of the development will be dedicated to green space. The road would cut directly into a very old, quiet neighborhood for not much gain. Don’t we have enough housing traffic in this area is now terrible Please do not extend Pine Ridge Rd. There is no reason to disrupt our quiet and peaceful neighborhood. As a wheelchair user, I feel safe in my neighborhood and take almost daily rolls through my neighborhood and around Pilot knob park and Central Park. I am however excited to have a new path as I can’t do the stairs by Unisys. Please leave the bluff. We are lucky to have that and the nature I oen observe while watching the area. The vegetation is also so pretty. I think the area is already over developed and would like the area remain natural park land with trails We live in the mcCarthy Road neighborhood. We are strongly opposed to connecting McCarthy Neighborhood with The Northwest commons area. Routing Traffic from Northwest commons through our quite neighborhood (with many young families) will negatively impact all of us in the neighborhood and increase risk to the many young children. This is a terrible idea for surrounding neighborhoods and for the safety of our children living here and playing in the neighborhood. I strongly oppose connecting Pine Ridge drive to this new development . Our neighborhood roads need to remain as is. The fewer bldgs the better. Lots of empty business bldgs in Eagan already so we don't need anymore. No more houses needed either. Plan provides some reasonable updates I appreciate the limited addition of housing. The surrounding neighborhood is home to many families with young children who frequent the commons area and park. Reducing additional traffic while preserving park space is an attractive option as our kids frequently use the parks and bike the trails. it should be developed into a veterans oasis park with annual fees except for Timbetline residents. We really don’t need more empty offices or retail space. This already high density housing area do we really need more apartments? Keep the woodsy feel of the neighborhood and park I would like to see large plant nursery built to give us seniors a chance to see green things in winter! Perhaps the first floor of the Argosy building could be turned into a dedicated Senior Center. Not enough public parking at the south end of the project . The housing in this area should be eliminated and converted to permanent public free parking. Keep as much open space of current rugby area as possible. Incorporate bluff into park. I like the housing just on the back side of this. for some reason, I'm appreciating the corporate that close - so it can be utilized for parking for events for NON- business hour events. Concept 3 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 17/78 Jobs are very important; unfortunately, the current Minnesota government will discourage job creation due to excessive taxes and spending. Consequently, the Eagan planners should take this into account when making decision. What looks good on paper may not necessarily lead to success. We don't need more empty retail and commercial spaces. There is already more than enough new retail in the old Lockheed area. And there is vacant office space and retail space all over Eagan. It makes no sense to add more. Expand the park for family and individual use This concept isn’t bold or transformative. It seems incremental and lacks identity. I don’t want the area to become commercialized and have a lot of new traffic and roads and not new apartments Maintain the green space! Less development! Focus on jobs We have enough houses, grocery stores, and banks. Let Eagan breathe. Let’s have the most amazing parks. They don’t bring in as much money but they make this the most desirable place to live. Tired of seeing all the cities sell out for money and profits. We do not need any more senior homes or apartment buildings. We have too many already. There is enough new multi housing in the area, keep this area buisness or nature focused. No more residential!!! Our community needs a sports complex with gyms. We either need to build one onto Eagan high school, or build a standalone complex at one of these sites. Almost every other community has something and we do not . Gym space is so limited, especially with the growth of pickle ball. This space would draw people to the area via sports tournaments. We do not need any more office complexes. There’s commercial real estate empty everywhere so build more? We do not want any more multifamily housing, we have added a lot to the city and it is losing its "town" feel. How about developing green space. Stop building it up do much that it turns into another Edina. I've lived here many years. Traffic has gotten horrible, crime is going up etc. If you must build. Build green space. Don’t over populate the area with multiple housing units. I think the bluff should remain undeveloped Feel as if more housing will create too much congestion in the city which has already grown 5,000 in the last few years. Re -development of a corporate campus or mixed use business with added support shop/food would be ideal Do not put any roads through exiting neighborhoods like oslund timberline. Thanks for the input opportunity to this exciting project! Excellent presentation by you. Well done. I guess I would like you to focus more or less strictly on park development: walking trails, aesthetic features, safety. Secondly, if retail enhances our nature experience, then that would make good sense. Thirdly, if residential must be factored in, then high-end, well-built homes would be very nice to see. If we must incorporate apartments, let's surround them with park features, so that park features *meet* park features; all in order to give the children (and all ages) at the apartments places to play: basketball, pickleball, skateboard. If these features are intelligently designed then everyone will feel comfortable. Let me emphasize the importance of as many shade trees as we can ensure stay put and/or are added. Keys = trees. Trees are the most important thing to have at these spaces, in my opinion. Trees provide beauty & peace, shade, comfort , and cohesion. I would make it so that there is a tree adjacent to another throughout the area. The fact that you have them scattered around ECC main area is wonderful, as you've noticed how many people park there under them in summer. Notice how awful the Hy-Vee commercial area is without shade trees. Worse is the music piped out at the center around R tacos. So, if you can: Please don't plant small trees that take lifetimes to come to fruition, but rather full-size, ready-to-serve, varieties (so to speak). I think the key is *not* to capitulate to average images of necessity, when such an opportunity as this can afford opportunities far beyond tired sensibilities. In other words, if people shout "jobs!" at you, it would be awful if we didn't consider *what kind* of jobs. Similarly, if people scream "housing" at you, well, our hands are tied, we must consider everyone, but that doesn't mean intelligent planning and design runs aground, but rather, let's make all ages and incomes overwhelmingly desirous to live there, 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 18/78 which makes of this whole thing a proud example of what medium size cities can do when spaces opens up. We go *forward*. Let's make Eagan so attractive and unproblematic (decisive) that as businesses may pack up, new ones come in! do not care where the rugby fields go The "Major Area of Concern" above says that the neighborhood to the north has no pedestrian path. This is false. There is a paved path to the neighborhood to the west side of the tennis courts. Please do not disrupt the northern neighborhood by connecting Pine Ridge Drive to the new development . 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 19/78 Rank how much you like features of Central Park Village Question Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Having a smaller amount of office and retail on the site 30%38%18%13% Having lots of housing on the site 10%13%21%56% The bluff is developed 7%18%22%53% The Park shape does not change 25%44%23%7% The rugby fields switch locations with the road in the park 7%47%29%17% Expand all /Collapse all Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Having a smaller amount of office and retail on the site Having lots of housing on the site The bluff is developed The Park shape does not change The rugby fields switch locations with the road in the park 30%38%18%13% 10%13%21%56% 7%18%22%53% 25%44%23%7% 7%47%29%17% 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 20/78 Any additional thoughts or feedback on this concept ? I don't like that off-site parking is required for large events. I really enjoy attending the various Eagan events and would hate to see this go. The additional housing would disconnect the area and would create much more traffic to an already congested area. I,like there is less retail. We have so much in eagan with the Central Park commons. Strongly against any sort of affordable housing development . We are seeing how this negatively effects the community through the Aster House. I wish an expansion of the ECC was part of this as well Really like this one! We don’t need housing even closer to flight paths of airport I think we are heading to a glut of over priced housing and this does not help. I don’t like rugby Indifferent about park shape and rugby field size I prefer as much green space as possible. Not adding housing to the bluff Don't want to ruin our natural beauty Like the bluff stays and still decent amount of housing and park space. I think a range of housing with connected retail (and transit connections) could be helpful in attracting young people to Eagan, especially if childcare is also available in the area We have a LOT of empty buildings and land that has been developed already, why are we focusing on this parcel(s) of land?? NA Develop additional 62+ co-Ops Please no more housing on Quarry Rd. It’s already congested enough with the 2 senior co-ops buildings, The Quarry Apts, plus ALDI, Canes, and hotel traffic. This seems like a good option. Particularly if we also try to attract new housing that has dual purpose space, like where people can do cottage food industry or small businesses from home. Mixed housing is a top priority so people can live and work in Eagan ( affordably!) Concept 3 is only fair plan See above comments - I am very opposed to more retail and/or office space. Any development of the area should be working to restore the oak trees and prairie the area once had. I am not a fan of so much housing. This large scale high density housing seems to be more than the surrounding infrastructure and neighborhood can handle. It would be very unfortunate to lose the opportunity to develop green space. Developing the bluff as housing is irreversible and would lose an opportunity to preserve green space for the community. The addition of housing, especially low income housing will make this space of low or no use do to crime. No more housiing. Keep Argosy's back parking lot as a parking lot . I don’t feel the need for additional housing. Don't have an informed opinion on the rugby fields Would prefer townhomes with 2 car garages.. adds residential, but doesn’t overflow the entire area! Very hard to find bigger townhomes in the heart of Eagan. Losing the parking lot would be a big hinderance. I feel like moderately popular events still don’t have enough parking now. We are losing all our beautiful green space in Eagan and what made our city special. I hate this concept of packing in as much as you can. Add more parks and green space and keep what little we have le in our city for all our residents to enjoy. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 21/78 This is way too many housing units for the area of land. This would not fit with the look and feel of the space and is less than ideal. No Eagan is still a bit of a bedroom community so I don’t get super excited about more apartments. I really dislike leveling the bluff. I think that runs the risk making the place look like one of those surreal neighborhoods built in a former corn field where you can see from one to the other. N/A If you’re following the MAC recommendations for the Metcalf school project , it only makes sense to do the same thing for this area. If your going to ruin one area of Eagan might as well use the money greed and do that to every space you get the opportunity to do so. Dense Housing is good I like that the rugby fields have parking near the field. I don't like the current parking for rugby, it is difficult for older people to walk up the hill from the ECC parking to the field to watch a game. It looks like this plan does not include much retail space, which is good, we have plenty of retail in Eagan. Could this plan exclude housing from the bluff ? This plan seems heavy on apartments. Crowded housing means crowded central park and all the things that go along with that . traffic, crime, loss of green space etc. Why waste resources moving rugby fields. Enhance what is there. Strongly prefer parks to housing Please don't over develop! NO NEW ROAD CONNECTION THROUGH THE TIMBERLINE RESIDENTIAL AREA!!! [Note: Your map shows a road connection through Pine Ridge Drive in Timberline. It is interesting that this is not addressed in your planning survey! So much for full disclosure, transparency, and honesty in government .] Why do we need rugby fields? Very low percentage of citizens utilize this Don’t pack in the housing. Too many in a small space. Increased housing and population in the area may affect the park use; could the park remain as-is and still service the community with the increase in use? What impact would more people have on the park and surrounding area, and could traffic be mitigated. Development of The Bluff feels counterintuitive to Eagan's focus on the environment; maintaining natural green spaces is vital to our community and the environment . I would prefer this area to be a place for everyone in Eagan to be attracted to. If it is mostly housing, it may not feel that way. too disruptive and the roads cannot accommodate that much more increased traffic What is the big deal with the rugby fields ? Move them over into the argosy parking lot then make a large parking lot around the fields and this can be used for community events also.... Keep them out of the North area....NO to any new opening of the North entrance. This option is horrible!!! See previous comment We already have a large population as a city, developing places for people to work in our community should take priority. A combination of walkable office, retail, restaurant , and green spaces would be wonderful. Please avoid giant paved parking lots. Provide people with places to live, work, and play. no housing or retail - we have plenty of space to be renovated elsewhere Increase walking and biking trails. add a Bandshell/amphitheater for concerts Not in agreement with taking the city's landmark park space and turn into housing space. The residents needs this open space for events, possible turf/dome structure, etc. and not housing that mirrors urban cores in Mpls. and St . Paul. We are a suburb and prioritize our green space in Eagan for a strong reason and purpose. I would prefer to see the bluff preserved but available to the public High density housing will cause more problems. There is already adequate retail space. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 22/78 I like the bluff decision Putting in housing makes sense given the limited housing available in Eagan and the huge demand for it . I like that you preserve the park with this approach. Retail and restaurants inside of residential makes sense because it reduces commuting and helps drive people to those businesses. It feels like too much housing and no longer community space, rather a private park for these tenants that the community intrudes on frequently. I don’t think we should develop the bluff If adding many new town homes and apartments is too much of a burden for the city's resources, build fewer. The park area is essential. Depends on the type of housing that is there. I think we have enough empty retail spaces nearby and don’t need new spaces either. Entertainment spaces would be a good solution I don’t mine housing if it isn’t to dense by being more then two stories high . It also needs unmantained green space around the perimeter of them . I call them buffer zones. Is there anyway to incorporate a community use facility with an indoor swimming pool? N/A We need walkable, mixed use buildings (ground level retail or housing) with 2-4 levels of housing above. This is the second best option. Eagan does not need more retail. I know this is the easy sell. (More retail). Resist . I have no opinion on the rugby fields See previous answer: Eagan is changing from the city of trees into the city of multi family dwellings and traffic. We don’t need any more housing, quit developing every single piece of land. Too much housing in the area. Second favorite concept (behind A Park Runs Through It) Restaurants with walkability please! We don't need or want to replace open spaces with housing. Housing demand is exaggerated. Green spaces will never be reclaimed when the perceived housing demand diminishes and we're le with low quality housing units. We live at a townhome in Farnum Drive, part of the Four Oaks association. I am extremely concerned that this concept seems to eliminate our walking access to Pilot knob park and the trail behind through the site as we do now. My husband is a cross country coach and runner and having access to this path is a must , as well as the safety of being able to get there without the concern of being hit by a vehicle. This concept also seems to cut our walking access to the Central Park from Four Oaks. We are both members of the fitness center and we also love to go there for events by walking through the existing unofficial path on Four Oaks. This concept seems to eliminate one of the best feature of where we live! We would like to keep the ability to walk through the old Delta site to access the walking path behind the school as well as Central park through the end of Four Oaks I like the park runs though it best Eagan is doing a great job keeping as much nature preserved as possible. I love the housing developments but it 's a shame to see the bluff go. Not a fan of developing mid to high density housing I really like this plan. Minimal office space, abundant multi-unit and multi-purpose housing, minimal new parking (a new garage at Central Park? Not sure about that .), plus spacious, parkland accessible by everyone. Maximum tax revenue generated by all the new housing units, which also address our current lack of housing. I see very little surface parking lots, which is terrific. In fact , residents in this new area would quickly find they don't really need a car. Maybe a coffee shop and convenience store are within walking distance, plus Hy-Vee is a quick bike ride away. Is there consideration to create a "Main Street" type area within this concept ? I could see a corridor within this plan that could manifest into a pedestrian-only Main Street hub of activity. The area of Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob is ready a traffic nightmare. No additional Housing or Apartments 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 23/78 Do not build any connection to Oslund Timberline. No North Road access point . We have plenty of ways to get to the ECC. This will create a plethora of safety, traffic, nuisance issues in our neighborhood. We live in Eagan for a reason. Quiet , private, and our children are safe. Again preference is to have less housing and more green space or retail/restaurants We do not need more urban housing, we are a suburb. This looks like the best use of the land. Save the bluff! This is cutting off the park area to most residents except the ones that live there and will create to much traffic in an area that doesn't need it and solution isn't to build more roundabouts for traffic control. This plan would just allow home builders to charge a premium price due to improvements to the park from the citys investment . This is once in a lifetime opportunity to retain beautiful land and preserve something that is irreplaceable. There are so many spaces farms, golf courses etc that have been buldozed into concrete, roads and homes that will never be back and I would like to see Eagan retain this space as something beautiful and enjoyable for all residents for many years to come. Think maybe a smaller theater of arts such as the Ames Theater on Nicollet Ave in Burnsville. it is a good size facility with ample parking but yet is not huge and/or offensive. Please consider no more houses, apartments or condos, life is so short let people emjoy the city in which they live. Our first responders (police, EMTs and firefighters} are busy all the time, I have lived in Eagan since 1976 and have extreme growth through that time, please slow down. It looks good. No more mass housing is needed in Eagan Yes more so the jobs on the park one NO! Too much housing density. Bluff needs preservation and likely natural resource restoration. We do not need anymore apartment buildings or senior housing. Too much housing. Would like to see some benefit for existing residents. Why is there any athletic field in the city’s central commons area? There are plenty of other alternative locations to serve an especially VERY small, niche activity such as rugby. See previous response Do not really see the need for rugby fields which only a minority of citizens have any use for. nO We need jobs in Eagan, not retail. We’ve lost a lot of companies in the last 20 years, we need to get creative about how we bring high paying jobs/companies back to Eagan. The high residential/retail model won’t be sustainable long-term. I’m against too much housing because Eagan just developed the land on Nichols with the huge residential building. And there has been a lot built closer to the outlet mall. I think it’s time to slow down on residential development for now. too much density of office and housing on the south side I love the idea of a more walkable living community, but losing The Bluffs is a big loss Again, strongly opposed to more housing. Rugby fields can be anywhere as long as there is parking available. With this plan the area will become overly congested and seriously distract from the comfort and beauty of the area. This plans sounds more like living in an inner city. I don't like much about this plan. I think that having lots of housing will dilute the use of the area as a public park for all residents. In addition, it seems short sighted to develop the bluff - making it part of the park is an opportunity that we shouldn't waste. Do not want to see more housing. Looks like way too much allocated for that in this plan. Again, I like the idea of housing IF it's not super expensive, however I would like to see the bluff le alone. I do think this is a bit much on the housing end of the spectrum and would prefer more green 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 24/78 space though. Why this development . Eagan is happy and healthy in its current shape. DO NOT ADD AN EXTENSION TO PINE RIDGE ROAD INTO THE DEVELOPMENT!!!! Same comments as question 5. The road connecting Pine Ridge Dr to the new development will drastically impact the quality of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood. I would not support any concept that includes this. 2nd choice Please Do NOT take away someone’s private property! Create a 55 and up community Why more retail? There is already so much in Central Park Commons. I don’t love the idea of adding more housing to this area. It will mean much more traffic and congestion. Destroying the bluff is not a welcome idea. How about less dense housing. I DO NOT want any North Road access entry into Oslund Timberline. Safety is the biggest concern. I can extrapolate data if needed to back up the safety issue surrounding any proposal for a road. Children's safety, pedestrians, dog walking, night running, number of new cars cutting through etc. Pass this to City Council. I will write this for any option. Thank you- Our neighborhood doesn't want this. You need to gather our feedback via coming to our neighborhood for a meeting, or setting up a date & time at the ECC exclusively for Oslund Timberline to share our feedback. I can say that all neighbors have been talking, and no one wants this. It's an emphatic NO from all neighbors. Do not connect to Red Cedar Rd You're just creating another housing development . What ever happened to "Tree City"? Why high rise or even lots of apartments? Most people given a choice want to live in a house on a lot of their own. Affordable housing of that low density variety is what people want . From long experience I know urbanists do not like low density housing, but remember you work for the people, not the other way round. I strongly like denser housing with mixed use buildings maximizing value per acre Too much housing Concern for too much housing/development enveloping the park space. What are occupancy rates in other nearby housing facilities? Does the demand justify the new housing? Too much high density housing. Would rather see more medium density. Do we really need more housing. Concerned about traffic and accessibility. This plan appears to have the best balance. Do we really need to add more apartments to this high density area? More homes or townhomes are fine. I would prefer that the parkland is maximized while attracting employers to CURRENT buildings. NO HOUSING in this site. Maximize Eagan Community Center by building a POOL, a core missing element driving people to join other clubs. EXPAND GREEN SPACE and NO HOUSING. City has already ruined wetlands by Moonshine park with low-income housing next to expanded apartments. There's enough housing near Central Park. Develop affordable housing under the insane airport noise runs and next to the industrial areas off Lone Oak Road. Keep open land No more high density housing No more packed in housing/apartments See above. I do not like the road going on to Red Cedar Rd from the north side There isn’t enough park space on the north side of Eagan. This is a great opportunity to move forward in and environment first way. LEAVE THE PARK ALONE Less residential and commercial. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 25/78 More high density housing adds crowding and makes Eagan a less appealing place to live. The amount of high density housing that has already gone up in Eagan in the last few years is alarming. The metcalf site is also of concern. Please consider expansion of more single family detached homes. There is also plenty of empty corporate space that is up for lease. Please preserve one of my favorite reasons for moving to Eagan, the green space. See previous comments - no more useless housing. I do not care for any project that takes away green space in the city. That is one thing that I love and drew me to this area. I work in and previously lived in St . Paul and cannot wait to get home to a city that has more open space and is not a concrete jungle. In this proposal, there is more concrete than green. We do not need more low income housing and apartments in this area. No more apartments See my last answer applicable to all of these sections Eagan does not need to lose anymore park space for useless retail and more housing. We need to utilize our land for useful thing for the community that are lacking like facilities such as a dome and park land and Sports complex. Sports complex and dome can be rented for income year round and used by community and can maintain park land too. Instead of more mass produced mass housing and retail just to see dollars, these are things that can bring money in but also invest in Eagan which is what has not been done for this city for a very long time. Too much housing and retail development . Na Eagan already has plenty of commercial spaces available aer other organizations have relocated. Housing is also already dense, no need to make it more congested. Preserve or expand as much green space as possible. No through roads to Oslund Timberline neighborhood That much housing will cause the park to feel like a dog park, a commercial site that isn't super busy on weekends like a medical office and retail that is not as consistently busy as a grocery store would be preferred. A busy road shouldn't be added in the middle of the park because people are already consistently speeding and disregarding others' safety on Pilot Knob and 13. Against the plan. This is not wanted by residents More park space Access road to Lone Oak via Pine Ridge drive cannot be allowed as it will completely disrupt our neighborhood. High density housing would do the same. Don't develop the Bluff! No more high density housing! Enough! Nobody wants to watch you chip away at the parks and add high density housing. Too much housing I don't want a through street from the proposed new housing development to the Oslund Timberline neighborhood (consisting of pine ridge, red cedar, woodlark, mccarthy road, etc.) Cars already drive way too fast in this neighborhood and adding a through street will only increase traffic not only from new or existing residents based on the proposal but also from people trying to get to Lone Oak, which is already a busy road. Do not add work spaces or housing. We don't need that . Adding to the park or leaving it as is is, in my opinion, the best option. No more housing needed. More community green space needed Keep green. This is not the place for housing or business No more low income housing in that area. More businesses. The road through the vacant lot on Red Cedar Road would be greatly and negatively impact the neighborhood. It would decrease neighborhood safety, increase traffic in an area where many children live, and decrease property value for the residents. The residents of this neighborhood are strongly against turning the vacant lot into a road. Please take the current resident's needs into account , for they already pay Eagan taxes. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 26/78 No housing or retail. Keep it natural The housing you describe sounds just like every other new apartment building this city, unaffordable. People who already live here are having to move away because we cannot afford apartments here anymore. We need affordable housing guaranteed. If you cannot guarantee it , expand the park. We know we need more housing - especially affordable housing for seniors. And we support that . But we HATE that this would completely change Oslund Timberline neighborhood. Our neighborhood would become the main cut-through for hundreds of people. We will be considering moving if this plan gets approved. We need more community space - not more housing and corporate space. Put in tennis, pickleball, a community pool, outdoor education space. We moved to Eagan for it being family friendly. Please continue to improve this. Don't sell out to commercial and residential tax revenue. Again, don’t care about the rugby fields. Combining new housing with an old neighborhood (red cedar area) is just cold hearted. It would suit us better to have more green space. There is so much housing and average below average retail going in (see olive garden), do we really need more it's tacky questions to vague to understand true meaning and possible unintented consequences in my answers No through street from Pine Ridge Drive We do not want access through Orlando timberline neighborhood Pretty neutral on the rugby location overall as we don't use that space. Probably out of balance here with too much higher density housing for this plot . Don't like that the back of the park (playground & splash pad) back up to a street . Again I see a new road connection on the north side to Pine Ridge Drive which would bring traffic into a neighborhood community which is a bad idea. 1) Strongly dislike privatizing bluff public that would permanently remove this public good forever. 2) Agree that marketing business space may be a low probability 3) Seriously disagree with insertion of tiny homes that overload demand on what will be a decreased public space. 4) Any assumption that homes will be less affordable in the future just by smaller size is likely to be wrong once actual future costs emerge. 5) Long range, the highest value of this land is the public park space that cannot be replicated. I don't like having traffic come through a neighborhood that isn't designed for it I hate everything about this plan. There is too much housing, destruction of the Bluff/natural landscape that current has animals and full grown beautiful trees. This will bring WAY too much noise, population density, and loss of natural beauty to the immediate area. I live off Pine Ridge Drive and am very concerned about the impact of all of these plans. ESPECIALLY the fact that this one proposes a road going through the vacant lot connecting directly to my block. I am NOT OKAY WITH THIS!!!!! I am concerned about the increase in traffic with would result in creation of the North Road. Keep the space open. Add more gym space, it seems all activites/sports/groups struggle to find ample space during the colder months. DON'T DEVELOP THE BLUFF! Park is great ..leave current design Neutral. Doesn't matter to me. I'll defer to those who use the field. Too much new housing right on the park doesn't feel welcoming to people who are visiting the park. It would feel like I am encroaching on someones yard and feels like would need a lot of additional city services for both visitors and residents. As above, I am strongly against that road that connects into Red Cedar Rd. I will not drive to visit a park surrounded by high density housing with my family. Eagan has enough apartments and low income housing. I don’t like the concept of apartments and townhomes rather than individual homes. At this end of town, there has been very little development of individual family homes. There has been lots of multi use housing developed through out the city, especially this end of the city. Survey is very confusing - double negatives. SHOULD BE A CLEAR YES OR NO ANSWER TO CHECK! 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 27/78 With this concept , people who don’t live in the new housing will feel less welcome to use the park and any new amenities. It will feel like it’s just for the residents and not the whole city. Again, I do not think more short term housing is what our community needs. We want people who care about the community and desire to move here and establish their hopefully permanent residence/make Eagan their home. I also disagree with the through road on Pine Ridge as I will be directly affected. I have a dog, a two year old daughter and a son due this coming January. I worry about the safety issues putting a road in and possibly widening our street would present . I think part of what people like about Central Park is that it’s open without housing. It feels like a park. Strongly dislike the northern access road through Red Cedar. It is not entirely clear why you need a northern access road that parallels an already useful Pilot Knob Road. If a northern access wasn't needed when those three businesses were at their peak, then why would it be needed when most of the development will be dedicated to green space. The road would cut directly into a very old, quiet neighborhood for not much gain. Again, don’t extend pine ridge road. Pilot knob elementary is getting full. Now will more housing effect the school population? We live in the mcCarthy Road neighborhood. We are strongly opposed to connecting McCarthy Neighborhood with The Northwest commons area. Routing Traffic from Northwest commons through our quite neighborhood (with many young families) will negatively impact all of us in the neighborhood and increase risk to the many young children. Concern for safety of our children if creating thru street through neighborhoods. Do not like plan due to unnecessary thru road through quiet neighborhoods There is already an ever-expanding number of housing areas on Pilot Knob Road. Don’t really like the thought of adding to this local congestion. I enjoy watching rugby and it is well utilized. Maybe other types of game fields instead of buildings. Concerns about a thoroughfare on north side to Red cedar road. Too disruptive to this neighborhood. I question the need for more multi family or high density housing in the area. The additional vehicle traffic would make it difficult for the many young children in the area to continue to bine and use the surrounding parks. Something we all take pride in now. There are many options for restaurants and shops in the surrounding areas. More single family homes to blend with the neighborhood less high density housing to make more seem less trails and more neighborhood feel. Blend the transition from retail to park area to residential homes better. Maintain the woodsy feel and connection to the trails and parks. Take into consideration the wildlife as well that travel in the near area. Less commercial use. The south end of the project is way too crowded with housing and office. There is no parking. The housing in this area should be eliminated and converted to permanent public free parking. Keep as much open space of current fields as possible. Incorporate bluff into park. No additional comments Lots of people walk daily throughout that entire area. I'd rather there be no housing, office, or retail and the park be expanded. We need a bigger park in that area. Don't care if the rugby fields move, as long as they still exist for people who use them I like that housing options are being considered. Also seems to have incremental improvements. Less development , maintain/add green space No more multiple unit housing or senior living, We have way to much already. Don't like the excessive housing Our community needs a sports complex with gyms. We either need to build one onto Eagan high school, or build a standalone complex at one of these sites. Almost every other community has something and we do not . Gym space is so limited, especially with the growth of pickle ball. This space would draw people to the area via sports tournaments. We do not need any more office complexes. There’s commercial real estate empty everywhere so build more? I think we should be looking at more park facility options for the citizens that are already in Eagan. The civic arena is too small and outdated to handle the volume it has already. Eagan does not have 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 28/78 any sports complexes and needs to try to keep up with other cities. Adding more housing is unnecessary. Leave it alone. We have enough traffic. If you must develop. Leave it to green space, or a place for wild life. No new roads through existing neighborhoods! Trees & breweries, can't lose. If we must , let us build whatever amount is necessary *high quality * affordable units. I can't believe what we subject underprivileged people to. Everyone is so ready to blame money (meanwhile ignoring good sense and creativity (both *free*). Let 's tell greedy businesses to take a hike. When people feel a medicom of pride with their surroundings, it shows. Consider an all-out ban on smoking, even in private. I've noticed that low-income dwellings are plagued with such low stadard habits. Consider also limiting dog size. Add as much city landscape beauty as possible while fostering community beautifying groups, complete with ways to counter scofflaws. don't know about the Rugby fields question There are many families with small children in the neighborhood to the north. Please do not disturb this neighborhood by making Pine Ridge Drive connect to this busy new area. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 29/78 Rank how much you like features of A Park Runs Through It Question Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Having a medium amount of office and retail on the site 22%39%21%18% Having a medium amount of housing on the site 18%28%24%29% The bluff isn't developed, and becomes part of the park 70%23%4%3% The Park grows by adding the bluff and land between Delta and Unisys 71%23%4%2% The rugby fields move up to Pilot Knob Park 25%49%14%11% Expand all /Collapse all Strongly Like Somewhat Like Somewhat Don't Like Strongly Don't Like Having a medium amount of office and retail on the site Having a medium amount of housing on the site The bluff isn't developed, and becomes part of the park The Park grows by adding the bluff and land between Delta and Unisys The rugby fields move up to Pilot Knob Park 22%39%21%18% 18%28%24%29% 70%23% 71%23% 25%49%14%11% 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 30/78 9. Any additional thoughts or feedback on this concept ? This is my favorite concept because it balances the park and natural features while also expanding housing. I don’t think we should have too much housing or retail.I do like the fields moving, Strongly against any sort of affordable housing development . We are seeing how this negatively effects the community through the Aster House. I love the new shape of the park. I think this gives a lot more options for families to enjoy the park outside of events as well This one’s okay Not helping our tax base and continues to put housing in the flight path Any additional acreage to the park is welcome. Would love the bluff to be developed Again, mostly green space. Don’t need anymore retail in that area 56.91 Will development on top of the bluff put it at risk I like the mixed use and bluffs stay. I really like this plan. It preserves and expands the green space and access to the green space. Preserving park space and housing is key. I'm not holding my breath, you're going to put housing in, people can't afford it , but will die broke trying to live there, o hey, let's give the CDA more and then they can continue to treat the residents of their buildings like second class citizens. And yet , our taxes won't go down even though you'll be getting more. NA Develop another 62+ co -op Please no more housing on Quarry Rd. It’s already congested enough with the 2 senior co-ops buildings, The Quarry Apts, plus ALDI, Canes, and hotel traffic. Seems like a good option. I’d love to see mixed housing types included. You need a no opinion choice. I do not care either way about rugby fields, etc, and this survey does not allow me to express that Great concept This one is definitely better than the other 2 options, but I think all development should be mandatory zero carbon emissions and that should go for any future business in Eagan. I am not a fan of loss of parking. Love the additional park space. This would be great mixed with the corporate park ideas from option #1 Again the addition of a public pool would be a great asset and money generator. No housing. Keep it a park with some retail. More trails and nature areas. More natural land! Build/develop infrastructure to help Eagan and its stakeholders survive climate change. Whatever is chosen, try and focus on an unique feature to promote/build/create. If using existing, go for the premier rugby fields in the midwest with amenities not found anywhere else in MN. Don't just enable another vapid, corporate approved, mixed-use site. (could be best rugby, ultimate frisbee, disc golf, business incubator/mall (mid-town global mkt). Perfect balance and flow! Please make larger townhomes— you can make them narrow and 3-4 stories. I love adding the bluff to the public space, as well as having the restaurant and retail right near it . I also like that housing is prioritized over office space. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 31/78 It's way too many housing units for the space. We all ready have so many multi units in the area. That is way too many housing units for the. Traffic and congestion will be terrible. Limit housing and increase park while jeeping as much of the look and feel as possible. It can always be changed or updated as needed years down the road. No I like the connecting the two parks so people can go from one to the other without feeling like they are trespassing. If you could manage to create a walking path that loops around the two that would be nice. It is hard to get a nice long walk in today so we don’t bother. N/A Concept 2, ruin every green space you can for the money. Don't like rugby I like having the bluff as park space and like less commercial space. Is the housing owned or are these rentals? Too much housing. I'd rather see businesses in this area. I think this concept offers the best solution for creating a multi-use area. This is definitely a "walkable city" approach, which is exactly a community for families, older residents, and active persons. NO NEW ROAD CONNECTON THROUGH THE TIMBERLINE RESIDENTAIL AREA!!! [Note: Your map shows a road connection through Pine Ridge Drive in Timberline. It is interesting that this is not addressed in your planning survey! So much for full disclosure, transparency, and honesty in government .] Why do we need rugby fields. A very SMALL percentage of citizens play this. Love the bluff joining the park This makes the most sense. Concern over parking, and what off-site parking would be available for ongoing large events the city currently supports. How can traffic be mitigated to increase flow and safety in the public space? This is great . The bluff and savanna are beautiful. I think the rugby fields are too large and prominent . I like the off-site parking, because I think there is enough space dedicated to parking. I like the mix of retail and housing. I hope the park continues to support native plants and ecosystems. I would be excited to visit . I'd like to preserve some natural spaces. The natural area around the ECC is unique and includes huge Bur Oak trees and savannas. I think redevelopment and upzoning is necessary in Eagan we need more sit down restaurants in eagan especially breakfast and vegetarian options There are approximately 85,000 people in Eagan and you only talked to 500...you are keeping this under wraps to much. this should be in the Sun newspaper front page. Also not a word about the timberwood senior village and how they feel with all the new traffic going by if the rugby fields are moved into their back yard. No to the opening of the North entrance. Also what is being done with the light tower? This plan would be better than the first option except for the inclusion of housing, especially the types described. This is just not something I could support . See previous comment No to additional housing development . A combination of walkable office, retail, restaurant , and green spaces would be wonderful. Please avoid giant paved parking lots. Provide people with places to live, work, and play. No housing or retail needed. We have plenty of space that can be utilized elsewhere More park!!! Off Leash dog space, not rental homes, but homes for owners/buyers (2 to 4 bedrooms) Similar comments as the Central Park Village option, housing units should not be a priority for development as too much public and green space is lost . For me, it is very important to preserve the bluff and have it be made part of City of Eagan park system. It is an increasingly rare oak savanna area in the metro which is well worth protecting. Concept 3 seems like a better balance of use as compared to concept 1 or concept 2. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 32/78 I think we need to be cautious with adding more retail space when there seems to be lots of empty strip malls and it appears that the need for “brick and mortar” seems to be finishing. I don’t remember seeing how retail is defined but if it includes restaurant or entertainment venues such as a Can Can Wonderland, seems like that would be a good fit for retail This is our favorite! More parks! Whatever is done, keeping Eagan as an attractive tax area is important for people to come to. Does Eagan really need more office space. It seems we have a lot already that sit empty. Please do not connect any road to redcedar road. Through traffic will ruin a very nice Quite neighborhood. Do not connect two different neighborhoods with roads. Connect them with a path and keep a wooded buffer zone around them. Is there anyway to incorporate a community use facility with an indoor swimming pool? N/A We need walkable, mixed use buildings (ground level retail or housing) with 2-4 levels of housing above. See previous answer: Eagan is changing from the city of trees into the city of multi family dwellings and traffic. We don’t need any more housing, quit developing every single piece of land. This concept has something for most people in the city. Love this one. I like the walkability between retail, restaurants, and the park. Restaurants with walkability please! Increase the park area, but do NOT put housing where the rugby fields are today. We don't need that much housing. We live at a townhome in Farnum Drive, part of the Four Oaks association. I like that our access to Pilot knob park and the trail going to the elementary school, as well as Central Park remains in this concept as we walk through the end of Four Oaks to both places very oen. I also like that the park is expanded. However, I am extremely concerned with having increased vehicular access to Four Oaks!! A bike trail/walking access to Four Oaks would be great , but please no motorized vehicles should go through there! I love this concept! Looks good - space for commercial expansion, no emphasis on mid or high density housing, and expanding park Very balanced. This is probably the happy medium between park redevelopment and housing development . I dislike the cluster of retail near Pilot Knob though. To build a true urban-type community and environment , retail and housing need to co-mingle in the same area. The "Central Park Village" concept blends that nicely. But for this one, you can clearly see the bifurcation between the housing and the office/retail. To me, this just looks like typical Eagan - houses over there, retail over here, with abundant parking for the retail/offices. I wouldn't be super excited if this plan were adopted, but it 's clearly better than Concept 1. This concept is a little house heavy but I do like how the park runs through the area Love this concept! Do not build any connection to Oslund Timberline. No North Road access point . We have plenty of ways to get to the ECC. This will create a plethora of safety, traffic, nuisance issues in our neighborhood. We live in Eagan for a reason. Quiet , private, and our children are safe. Eagan doesn’t need more retail and apartments/high density living. It needs green space and actual park amenities for families. Less housing is the preference Would love this if there was more on creation and less housing. good option as well This is the best option. It brings the park to more people and creates a greenway connecting two parks. Please consider handicapped persons when you think about spreading out parking accross the area. This is cutting off the park area to most residents except the ones that live there and will 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 33/78 create to much traffic in an area that doesn't need it and solution isn't to build more roundabouts for traffic control. This plan would just allow home builders to charge a premium price due to improvements to the park from the citys investment . This is once in a lifetime opportunity to retain beautiful land and preserve something that is irreplaceable. There are so many spaces farms, golf courses etc that have been buldozed into concrete, roads and homes that will never be back and I would like to see Eagan retain this space as something beautiful and enjoyable for all residents for many years to come. Think maybe a smaller theater of arts such as the Ames Theater on Nicollet Ave in Burnsville. it is a good size facility with ample parking but yet is not huge and/or offensive. Please consider no more houses, apartments or condos, life is so short let people emjoy the city in which they live. Our first responders (police, EMTs and firefighters} are busy all the time, I have lived in Eagan since 1976 and have extreme growth through that time, please slow down. Nope. No more apartments. It should be all detached townhomes like similar areas of shakopee Same feedback as concept 1 for me. Make this whole area a park - add playgrounds, tennis courts, pickleball courts, basketball courts, walking and biking paths. That area already has a large amount of commercial, retail, medical and restaurants. I understand that demolishing the existing commercial is a heavy cost , but I've lived in the area my whole life and just this past season learned that Eagan has a community area and this was it . Expand the park so more people can see from Pilot Knob a beautiful and preserved park. It would also bring more business to that area. No My personal favorite over the three. I see this being a cool place to live with smaller shops and offices to support more services and making a more walkable field. And plus more Rugby! Please see comments above - why not have a public space for nature? WE DON'T NEED MORE BUILDINGS -if we are to think long term, we need to preserve natural space and create more of it . Not just a few acres surrounded by more buildings. Prefer less dense housing. This by far is best concept . Feel that Eagan already has too much retail and office space, concept 1. Do not at all approve of developing bluff in concept 2. Like that there is what looks like a green corridor in concept 3, but would argue that it would be good to expand upon this if possible. Looking to the future, connected green space/habitat benefits both wildlife and humans. Would strongly urge less hard scape/ infrastructure, and more green space with native trees/plants and habitat . This will be most forward thinking approach, especially given climate change/loss of habitat currently taking place. More green space!!! Stop hurting the environment and building things we don’t need. I don't care about rugby fields, entirely unnecessary. We need housing, not rugby. This is by far my favorite concept . I think prioritizing green space and not increasing density is a huge attractor in Eagan generally, and this will enhance that . I like the idea of more of a balance between residential and commercial. This plan still seems heavy on residential. Would there be "senior" apartments or condos? Would apartments be affordable for people working in restaurants & retail? It seems like there is currently a shortage of workers, so apartments that are affordable to people working in the retail & restaurant industries seems like a good idea. Retail should compliment the park vision. Corporate should be office and professional-not industrial or manufacturing. Evening use should be attractive and safe. Still do not see the need for rugby fields anywhere. Please no more retail or low income housing near the park. nO Parks are plentiful in Eagan, the city shouldn’t try to buy more land and increase city costs. We need jobs in Eagan, not retail. We’ve lost a lot of companies in the last 20 years, we need to get creative about how we bring high paying jobs/companies back to Eagan. The high residential/retail model won’t be sustainable long-term. I do like keeping Eagan as green as possible - Nature is critical to Mental Health. too dense with housing on west and north sides, as well as housing and office on south Seems the most balanced development while also focusing on the enhancing the park. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 34/78 The more parks the better. Plus the addition of restaurants in Eagan is needed I like the idea of some office and retail space if the city/residents/visitors can sustain it . Of the three options this is the one I prefer the most . Moving the Rugby fields is not an important factor for any of the plans. As long as they still exist moving them is not a problem. This plan also has way too much housing and commercial space/density for the area and minimal park and trail area. This plan creates more problems than it solves. There's very little opportunity to gain open space and create park areas for public use - given the public amenities already here it seems wise to expand on them and connect the existing stores/parks/homes in a more usable way. Would prefer to see a plan with less housing allocated. The last thing I’d want to see for this land is yet another apartment building. This is my personal favorite option. I think it 's a good balance between commercial, residential, and green space. I feel like that is also the best option for retail/restaurants in that area as they don't have to rely heavily on commercial/office tenants for business, and creates and area that is more walkable for people since it 's not just commercial. Don't spoil Eagans beauty by adding more retail and housing. DO NOT ADD AN EXTENSION TO PINE RIDGE ROAD INTO THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT!!! Same answer as question 5. The road connecting Pine Ridge Dr to the new development will drastically impact the quality of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood. I would not support any concept that includes this. 1st choice. Whichever brings in highest property taxes so mine goes down!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO LOW INCOME HOUSING!!! We have enough It sounds like no matter what the government is taking away (or forcing people to sell) their own private land. This is not right! I think this may be a better balance of the 3 options. I am a fan of more park and walking space. I think housing and a public park are needed more right now. Too much housing packed in next to existing neighborhoods. It is too big of a change to the existing areas. Like this most but feel there is too much housing. I DO NOT want any North Road access entry into Oslund Timberline. Safety is the biggest concern. I can extrapolate data if needed to back up the safety issue surrounding any proposal for a road. Children's safety, pedestrians, dog walking, night running, number of new cars cutting through etc. Pass this to City Council. I will write this for any option. Thank you- Our neighborhood doesn't want this. You need to gather our feedback via coming to our neighborhood for a meeting, or setting up a date & time at the ECC exclusively for Oslund Timberline to share our feedback. I can say that all neighbors have been talking, and no one wants this. It's an emphatic NO from all neighbors. Keep the bluff Do not connect to Red. Cedar Rd Eagan needs more of a "Park Runs Through It", and less development . I enjoy the park as is and see no need for additional development or moving the rugby field. Again, academic urban planning thinking is ruling your options. Most people will assume those are the only options. I'd suggest high density housing at Unisys, low density on Delta, retain the parking behind Argosy (buy the lot or rights to use), and apartments south of Argosy. Simple. Doable. A small retail site north of central park between Delta and Unisys that provides essential services (maybe a gas station convenience store, hair dresser/barber, that kind of business. No housing The more park space the better. I currently avoid biking on the Delta rd to Lone Oak/Pilot Knob. We need more bike/walking trails This is by far the best option. Still believe we need a hospital 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 35/78 This seems to be the best balance of uses for the site in my opinion. It connects the park, allows for a village community, and preserves a continuous green space. I feel like you could combine Jobs on the Park with A Park runs thru it if commercial space/ revenue are a priority. While not quite as balanced as concept 2 this is the concept (3) I personally like the most . It adds a generous amount to the park/public portion of the area which is a trademark of Eagan and figures greatly in the decision of many to move here. I like the connectivity and greenway feel of this concept . Moving rugby field is a good idea. I would prefer that the parkland is maximized while attracting employers to CURRENT buildings. NO HOUSING in this site. Maximize Eagan Community Center by building a POOL, a core missing element driving people to join other clubs. EXPAND GREEN SPACE and NO HOUSING. City has already ruined wetlands by Moonshine park with low-income housing next to expanded apartments. There's enough housing near Central Park. Develop affordable housing under the insane airport noise runs and next to the industrial areas off Lone Oak Road and near the bars and restaurants. The area needs all the GREENSPACE possible. No more high density housing See previous answers. No housing, more park. Ok with a little retail/restaurants How would moving the rugby fields affect events that require a lot of parking/space? Food truck festivals? Restaurants overlooking the park sounds nice but it also sounds like you’ll be paying too dollar for a nice view. No thanks. People need FREE fun right now. See above. For Rugby, they need enough land/space to host tournaments. They also need storage. Look I don’t really care where the rugby fields go. The Bluff needs to be utilized as a nature area to give the park its own unique thumbprint LEAVE THE PARK ALONE Still too much housing. Please preserve the park. Consider expansion of services at the community center as well or a larger inclusive playground. I like this one because the acreage of the park is the highest and preserved the bluffs. But still question the need for more businesses in that area. We need more parkland and less offices and housing. The less housing the better. Same answer as before Eagan does not need to lose anymore park space for useless retail and more housing. We need to utilize our land for useful thing for the community that are lacking like facilities such as a dome and park land and Sports complex. Sports complex and dome can be rented for income year round and used by community and can maintain park land too. Instead of more mass produced mass housing and retail just to see dollars, these are things that can bring money in but also invest in Eagan which is what has not been done for this city for a very long time. I like the park space, but would like less retail and housing. Expand our parks, no more housing and vancnt office spaces Eagan already has plenty of commercial spaces available aer other organizations have relocated. Housing is also already dense, no need to make it more congested. Preserve or expand as much green space as possible. No through roads to Oslund Timberline neighborhood For all concepts, strongly dislike high density housing. lower density housing is preferred. This would be a detrimental amount of housing in the park. There would be nowhere to park a car for events and apartments have already been constantly added in this district of Eagan. A study should be done of the crime statistics for apartment units in Eagan and their neighboring 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 36/78 businesses. There is a lot of breaking and entering that happens by the Outlet Mall that is constantly reported on Ring. Does the type of commercial real estate affect what crime occurs nearby? I would prefer to keep the park safe. we don't need more office space Access road to Lone Oak via Pine Ridge drive cannot be allowed as it will completely disrupt our neighborhood. High density housing would do the same. Keep the green space! Too much housing This is my preferred option since the footprint for commercial is smallest , the park area is the largest , and the natural feature preservation. I don't want a through street from the proposed new housing development to the Oslund Timberline neighborhood (consisting of pine ridge, red cedar, woodlark, mccarthy road, etc.) Cars already drive way too fast in this neighborhood and adding a through street will only increase traffic not only from new or existing residents based on the proposal but also from people trying to get to Lone Oak, which is already a busy road. Do not add work spaces or housing. We don't need that . Adding to the park or leaving it as is is, in my opinion, the best option. The more area of park and green space the better No housing or business development . Indoor pool! No low income housing. More business. Please do not increase traffic through the neighborhood around Red Cedar Road, as this would devastate the neighborhood. Changes to the rugby field location here may impact street parking in the neighborhood. Why move the rugby fields? We do not need more apartments by the park. It will turn it into drug alley. One level, zero entry, townhomes are needed and would be a bonus. There are more expansions to the park that could be made including more connectivity with bike and walking paths to existing trails. To reiterate, the housing provided needs to be low income and we should be conservative with building offices due to the current work from home trend. Having a communal office that is affordable for normal people to rent for a few hours would be appreciated. Please also be mindful of parking. The previous addition of shops in that area have made it extremely dangerous to drive and walk through. I do not go to that area unless absolutely necessary because I have almost been hit several times by careless drivers speeding around shops. Why does the housing need three outlet roads? Why ruin the beloved Oslund Timberline neighborhood by connecting hundreds of new residents to it ? Please please please do not connect to Pine Ridge Road!!! We need more community space - not more housing and corporate space. Put in tennis, pickleball, a community pool, outdoor education space. We moved to Eagan for it being family friendly. Please continue to improve this. Don't sell out to commercial and residential tax revenue. People can use pilot knob to get around to these locations, I do not believe a road should be built on pine ridge, It is going to cause a lot of congestion in the neighborhood and the nice quiet neighborhood that once was will no longer be. People will probably move with the road being place on Pine Ridge. I think things need to be done to the empty lots however pilot knob is just fine and can get to all locations from there. there was never an issue before so why change that ? Again, don’t care about rugby fields. Put the housing in the old Argosy site and in the Unisys area along pilot knob. Leave the rest for growing the park by a large amount . Put a true bandshell in there where we can have larger concerts. Create a proper event center that is separate from the community center so we can have a truly inclusive community center that doesn't have trails closed randomly for weddings. Driving access from Pine Ridge drive should be removed as an option No through street from Pine Ridge Drive! We do not want access in to timberline Feels creative. Love having additional park features, and love opening the door to exceptional restaurant patios. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 37/78 Strongly dislike a new road on the north side connecting Pine Ridge Drive which would create a variety of traffic in a neighborhood community. 1) Like fewer tiny home density. 2) Crest of the bluff that has most valuable view appears to be sold off to private interests. 3) Good relocation of sports field. 4) Graphic looks like there is a loss of parking space. * All 3 seem to lack adequate parking for events and sports teams. This is great , creating more public parkland when the opportunity is available secures it for future generations. This concept provides the most continuity of public space and will support development surrounding it . Still putting traffic and parking where it doesn't belong I strongly do not support this plan. I do not support a proposed road connecting this mess to Pine Ridge Drive (the street on which I live with my husband and small children.) I strongly oppose the relocation of the rugby field to where you suggest . I very much oppose the density of housing in this plan - it is really upsetting. Why do we need more multi-family housing? Why can't you just build a small area of nice, single -family homes? They will sell and you'll have long term/invested owners! I like keeping the land as a park with minimal traffic where it would not be necessary to creat the North Road. All of these options have too many commercial/housing options. Once green space is gone, we can't get it back. Look at what a treasure Como Park is in St .Paul, somebody had the forethought to keep a large open space! Neutral. Doesn't matter to me. I'll defer to those who use the field. I like keeping the bluff as part of the park but that means it is city owned I take it . My problem with all of these is the lack of a community feel. It is now all residential and commercial and not a real park anymore. I won't feel comfortable walking my dog because it will just be walking through more neighborhoods. All in all please think about less concrete. I really love this park concept! Please consider adding a 3 mile walking path - could do paved or a dirt trail. I don’t like the concept of apartments and townhomes rather than individual homes. At this end of town, there has been very little development of individual family homes. There has been lots of multi use housing developed through out the city, especially this end of the city. NO. STRONGLY AGAINST a road connecting to Pine Ridge Drive, and believe there is no real purpose in connecting to our very quiet neighborhood, when you already have Tower View Drive and Four Oaks Rd you can connect to that can handle the increase in traffic and already established room for sidewalks etc. Main concerns: SAFETY and noise. This seems to be best for the future. I like the option of expanding the park. We frequent the park at the Eagan community center and like to walk around the trails as well. I would prefer minimal housing. Again, no through road on Pine Ridge. Strongly dislike the northern access road through Red Cedar. It is not entirely clear why you need a northern access road that parallels an already useful Pilot Knob Road. If a northern access wasn't needed when those three businesses were at their peak, then why would it be needed when most of the development will be dedicated to green space. The road would cut directly into a very old, quiet neighborhood for not much gain. We live in the mcCarthy Road neighborhood. We are strongly opposed to connecting McCarthy Neighborhood with The Northwest commons area. Routing Traffic from Northwest commons through our quite neighborhood (with many young families) will negatively impact all of us in the neighborhood and increase risk to the many young children. Unnecessary entrance through neighborhood when there are FIVE other options to access this area If forced to choose I prefer more parks and less commercial and/or housing development . Can’t tell what the short access line to Red cedar road is. If bike or walking path I somewhat like that . Too much housing. I appreciate the preservation of the park. I think there are to many housing units created in the option and would bring many of the same traffic concerns as previously stared due to the young 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 38/78 kids in the surrounding areas. Keep it a park with additional amenities The south end of the project is too crowded with housing and office. There is no very little parking, and no overflow parking. The housing in this area should be eliminated and converted to permanent public free parking. I did not answer a lot of the questions because I had a lot of questions to ask before I could give an informed opinion. I do feel strongly though that we at least keep the parking we already have if not expand it more. This past 4th of July was a good indicator on how much parking space is needed and how much are city is growing. If you truly want the residents in the surrounding area to fully enjoy one of these concepts, ,especially as a family unit , you'll make sure that there's adequate parking., Thank you for reaching out and asking for opinions. Joan Collado Lots of people walk daily throughout that entire area. There is no need for additional housing, retail, or office space in this area. What we need is more green space. As long as the rugby fields still exist , location doesn't matter This seems like a nice overall concept and more bold than the other options. Don’t develop the area. Leave it green Keep park and green space! I like the idea of adding more park biking and hiking areas with some shops and affordable housing. No more multiple unit housing and senior living centers. Our community needs a sports complex with gyms. We either need to build one onto Eagan high school, or build a standalone complex at one of these sites. Almost every other community has something and we do not . Gym space is so limited, especially with the growth of pickle ball. This space would draw people to the area via sports tournaments. We do not need any more office complexes. There’s commercial real estate empty everywhere so build more? Leave things as is. If you must develop build more green space, grassy areas for flowers and wildlife. No new roads through existing neighborhoods Nice job on your presentation. Kudos to your city services! Eagan is hands down the loveliest city in town! no I like this plan the most since it creates a strong overall Central Park that is fully unified. It would mimic Lebanon Hills Regional Park in that it creates a unified open space with housing and office to the perimeter. It’s what a Park of this size “wants to be”. Please do not destroy the neighborhood to the north by connecting Pine Ridge Drive to all the new housing. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 39/78 Rank the three concepts from 1 (your favorite) to 3 (your least favorite) Question 1 2 3 Concept 1: Jobs on the Park 27%26%48% Concept 2: Central Park Village 11%43%46% Concept 3: Park Runs Through It 59%29%12% Expand all /Collapse all 1 2 3 Concept 1: Jobs on the Park Concept 2: Central Park Village Concept 3: Park Runs Through It 27%26%48% 11%43%46% 59%29%12% 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 40/78 Is there any other additional information you'd like to provide to the City Council and planners? Possibly a nice pool or two for eagan residents, one for kids and one for adults. There is no place to go swimming other than cascade bay or the ymca. The park could be there too. Could make a wonderful park and pool too. Strongly against any sort of affordable housing development . We are seeing how this negatively effects the community through the Aster House. Please consider upgrading the play ground as well. A quality play area for children in this area is lacking. Affordable housing and walkability would be amazing Nice commercial building like Argosy could be used for educational purposes. Tearing down a high quality building is wasteful Glad that you are assessing lots of various ideas for the land. I would like to see smaller businesses like t-Rex cookie vs big chains like Olive Garden…… I am in this area a LOT and prioritize walking and community I think housing is a great idea but I also worry about the current economy and current generation not being able to afford housing very close to such a big part of the community. I walk around this area quite oen and really would love an expanded trail, adding more recreation like golf, basketball, etc. Parking is a big factor. My family and I choose not to attend some events due to parking concerns. 5th Conservation I'd like to see more detached condos available in the area. More options for sports opportunities and to include neurodiverse people We really need walkable spaces that are interspersed with housing/retail, not just sequestered into dedicated parks. CPC should be that , a focal point development that brings people into interaction as they walk, shop, go to events, etc. More senior living needed to keep residents in Eagan aer kids are grown. Creating jobs is pointless is there is nowhere for them to live. Do not put additional apartment buildings or townhomes in the area at all. There is plenty of housing in the adjacent areas. Improving bike/walking paths to the area (in addition to within the area) is something I would appreciate as a current Eagan resident . No, my input doesn't matter. Higher density housing intermixed with the businesses and park. Make sure public transportation is worked int each plan ( inter city connection to transit center, City Hall / Library/ Cascade Bay & ice arena area/ with affordable fees for all citizens All this city does is destroy the land to jam in more people and businesses to get more tax money. Please no more housing on Quarry Rd. It’s already congested enough with the 2 senior co-ops buildings, The Quarry Apts, plus ALDI, Canes, and hotel traffic. I am in favor in preserving as much undeveloped space as possible and expanding the park. I think it is important to save green space. With so many housing developments, we are truly losing a lot of the nature aspect that attracted us to Eagan in the first place. Energy efficient housing and lots of EV charging please Retain and expand the farmers market area and outdoor event venue No Great concepts. A balance of retail, housing, and jobs is preferred. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 41/78 More bike paths now! As a neighbor living north of North Commons, we are hoping that the development will minimize the impact on surrounding neighborhoods. We like the idea of combining option #1 with option #3: Why not add an indoor pool with opportunities for affordable lap swim and water fitness for adults. There are lots of swim lessons offered at the school pools, but not a lot of options for adult lap swim, water aerobics, lazy river walking during the cold months. Lifetime and the YMCA aren’t affordable for all. Lifetime has prioritized pool activities that make money rather than allow access for low impact fitness. Not every piece of land in Eagan needs to be developed. Reasonably price singled family homes take more space but go much further to helping low income families build wealth via real estate. No one makes generational wealth selling their low income apartment to another low income person. A sports dome and public pool would be preferred to all of this and potentially bring some revenue to the city. make it a destination recreational area. Create enough parking even for large events or offer shuttle buses. Add a hockey rink Be Bold. Build/develop infrastructure to help Eagan/MN and its stakeholders survive climate change. Nothing else matters. Tax me and incentivize GREEN development , everything carbon negative. Whatever is chosen, try and focus on an unique feature to promote/build/create. If using existing, go for the premier rugby fields in the country with amenities not found anywhere else in MN. Don't just enable another vapid, corporate approved, mixed-use site. Could be best rugby, best ultimate frisbee, disc golf, business incubator/mall (mid-town global mkt). Is there any plan to add other public amenities other than added trails? Just curious. I really the city needs tax revenue but we moved to Eagan 23 years ago because we loved all the green space. Little by little all that green space is disappearing and dense housing is replacing it . Eagan is losing what made is special. It's not progress to increase the carbon footprint . This plan to develop all this land make me very sad. So many people use the park and the delta land to walk, exercise, ride bikes, etc. What a huge loss for our community. What about more park space? Sports fields, pickle ball courts? We need more of these. I just wish the city would consider saving more of this park land. We moved to Eagan in 2000 because of all the open land and green space. Now very little of that beautiful green space is le. You have an opportunity to increase parks, sports fields, etc. We live in the townhome next to the Delta land. This will totally ruin our quiet , peaceful neighborhood. I am so opposed to developing all this land and shoving way too many units in there. Please do not connect the pinr ridge drive road, it will increase uneeded traffic for the residents in that neighborhood and make them resent the new space. There are enough "corporate campuses" in Eagan sitting vacant and are becoming a thing of the past . No need to add more. Whatever that big nested cylinder thing is on the bluff, it should be lit up with lights that slowly change color. That green gets really old. N/A The MAC planning has to be at least 5 years old and outdated. Quit following them and their recommendations. Remember that we have lost Carriage Hills Golf Course and Parkview Golf Club. Eagan may be the largest Minnesota city without an 18 hole course. Any development must carefully consider preserving open space. Without an active park system, Eagan merely becomes another vanilla suburb lacking distinguishing characteristics. Don't turn Eagan into Burnsville. I don't care if fireworks have to move. It's one night a year. Cyndee fields is outta her mind Townhouses and small and medium apartments. What exactly does this look like? More three level townhomes? Are the apartment all rentals? I want to sell my single family home and downsize to something aimed at empty nesters but there are so few options to buy in Eagan. Central park and the surrounding area is the heart of Eagan City. We don't have a "downtown" in the traditional sense, but we have this space which I have used frequently since moving here. Market 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 42/78 Fest , 4th of July festivities, parks and rec programs...how would these things be impacted by filling this area with high density housing? What space in Eagan would be large enough to take its place, or would that community space (metaphorically and physically) be splintered & lost ? I'd consider not just growing eagan housing and jobs, but how can this be an opportunity to enhance the property while being respectful of precious environmental resources. Eagan's logo is a tree, and it 'd be amazing to see this ciry property being used to protect and preserve our natural resources. The plan should be sustainable long term, office buildings have proven with Covid to be up and down. I like the idea of expanded park. Would be cool if there was more retail and restaurants. If we are already losing corporations, it doesn't make sense to re -invest in another corporate campus. The third concept strikes a nice balance between retail and office space. Again, with extremely limited data on the future demand for corporate offices (and in fact , the city losing some corporate residents already), that would be a strongly disfavored approach to me. Please don't over develop! We love green spaces! NO NEW ROAD CONNECTION THROUGH THE TIMBERLINE RESIDENTIAL AREA!!! Timberline is a long-standing residential area that has many children and seniors. It will not safely support additional traffic. Previous City Councils have acknowledged this factor (for over 45 years) and promised not to build a through road. (Note: I was a member and long-time chairman (20+ years) for the advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. This promise was upheld many times over the years in my presence by the City Council to the residents of Timberline.) [Note: Your map shows a road connection through Pine Ridge Drive in Timberline. It is interesting that this is not addressed in your planning survey! So much for full disclosure and honesty in government .] I’d like to see expanded community services at the park. Specifically a sports dome like in Rosemount and/or expanded kids pool like in inver grove heights. I like all the plans and am for more density and efficient use of space while maintaining the size of the park Housing should not be luxury or high priced. Eagan has enough high value property and net worth residents, causing an imbalance in long term city needs and planning decisions The more human-friendly and gathering (imagine the farmers market!) the better. Affordable housing is needed Don’t allow developers to build big boxy apartment buildings. The building surrounding the park should blend in. Current traffic and parking in the area is not ideal during public events; there should be a strong consideration for traffic flow, parking and safety (pedestrian bridge?) in any of the plans as they all will increase traffic in the area. I would love for Eagan to attract more young people. It 's easier said than done, but I'd like Eagan to be less car-dependent , with unique retail and housing. we need more sit down restaurants in eagan especially breakfast and vegetarian options A permanent Farmer's Market location that is open year-round, like MNPLS and STP has would be a great addition to Eagan and the South Metro. Everyone I talk with has no idea what is going on here. Send a letter out or something so people know what's going on. Housing ≠ Park How about no further development at this site? The city doesn't have to pave everything within its borders. High density housing will have other impacts on traffic in the area. Already it is much more crowded due to the high density housing built in recent years. We all know how awful driving and shopping in Apple Valley is due to the high density housing. Please don't let Eagan become like that . That being said, I do think there is opportunity to add some housing, and walkable access to Central Park would be a major perk. Centennial Lakes in Edina is an example of how this has been done tastefully. Kelly Park in Apple Valley is an example of how this has failed. We definitely have a need for more sit-down restaurants in Eagan along with additional housing. I do not want to lose park land and additionally the pavilion needs more parking. A combination of walkable office, retail, restaurant , and green spaces would be wonderful. Please avoid giant paved parking lots. Provide people with places to live, work, and play. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 43/78 Eagan needs more to attract it as a place where people want to come shop and dine out . Olive Garden and Red Lobster are NOT it! Urge to get healthy restaurants like the chain in FL and others True Food Kitchen, Crisp and Green, etc. Focus on it being a healthy place to live, eat and work. And this community needs a sports dome! And more pickleball courts! Find a business or company who run an indoor facility like Hope Field House or a sports dome with turf fields that can go up and down in summer. Eagan is a great place to live but has more work to do. Emphasize the outdoor space. This is a great location for music concerts/concerts in the park. Please add an indoor swim area to the community center. Create a space safe for Triathlon (swimming, biking, running), safe for dogs as well. I like the lake/water features (East Lake in Lakeville is beautiful). This might be a good space for a 55+ community. More wide bike paths. More nature/park space is preferred. Get rid of the southern housing units. Consider what goods and services can be provided by added retail, just don't add another strip mall experience. Housing options should be aimed at the higher income spectrum and the fewer units the better. Being able to host larger, city wide events should be key (e.g. July 4th FunFest) so parking space and open space should be prioritized. I would like to see all concepts have enhancements to the park/trails and keep the bluff preserved but add to the park Minimal office/retail and no housing would be my first choice. Traffic’s concerns Thank you for gathering this feedback. I wish there was a way to create more single family home housing in Eagan, but I applaud that you included housing in your designs. Central Park is an incredible amenity in Eagan so losing it would be very sad. I appreciate you finding ways to enhance it with an eye toward current and future trends (like mixed use to reduce commuting) and the need to care of our environment . Our fantastic parks and outdoor spaces are what make Eagan exceptional! Let's keep that the focus as we consider how to develop this land. Thanx for allowing the community to have input and then move ahead with the best possible scenario for Eagan. Parking and accessibility for everyone in Eagan is paramount It would be nice to see more field space with the Rugby fields. A few soccer fields or even an indoor sport complex would have been nice instead of so much retail space. I would imagine there being revenue in renting the space and hosting tournaments It’s hard to know what the housing would look like from the drawing. If the housing drawing is to scale and and set it is really unimaginative. I love the park going all the way through to the tennis court .. I also hat the rugby field being moved. Do not want to see Pine Ridge street go thru, would like to see more use for Pilot Knob park. It has lights for some amount of night events. I wish the number of housing units in the Park Runs Through It was not so high. The park should feel like open space and inviting to the entire city, not surrounded by 1400 housing units. I am very concerned about the proposed congestion since I live immediately adjacent to the Delta property No high density housing Is there anyway to incorporate a community use facility with an indoor swimming pool? I’m sure some of my answers contradict each other! I love having so many parks in Eagan, which is a big plus for the community. I’m tired of seeing new apartment buildings everywhere I go in the Twin Cities. On the other hand, it’s difficult to buy affordable houses. No We need to take the streets back from cars and for people. Studies prove that dense, mixed use development with ample green space will keep our city financially healthy for years to come. I don’t actually agree with the synopsis of the three options. I’m really hoping we don’t build more malls or retail space. Those are low paying jobs. We have enough of those. There's a need for sporting goods. Please no more chain sit-down restaurants. Franchise quick service restaurants are fine, but no more Applebee's and Olive Gardens. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 44/78 Seriously quit with all the housing. It feels like you’re taking every single piece of greens. Space really ridiculous, monetizing and fast food restaurants. How is this preserving our wildlife and green spaces? It’s not . Check out Bakery Square in Pittsburgh for a great example of revitalized development . Emphasis on walkability, defocus on cars and parking. Invite "downtown" living with shops and restaurants within walking distance, in addition to the park. Expand and connect the part area. Do NOT add additional housing. If private commercial or retail have plans to develop, then allow at the outer edges of the property, keeping the park as open and isolated from large populations. We want more green space. This council and mayor care more about tax revenue than they do keeping Eagan a clean, green place to live. We live at a townhome in Farnum Drive, part of the Four Oaks association. My husband is a cross country coach and runner. We are concerned about keeping our walking access to the Pilot Knob park and the trails behind it as well as walking access to Central Park through Four Oaks. However, we also do not want to see any increase in the vehicular traffic through Four Oaks. We believe there should be a bike/walk patch connecting Four Oaks and the site but not a road. We are also concerned that if vehicular traffic increases within the site being developed, with housing and other developments, that there must be sidewalks and/or dedicated trails with minimal/no road crossings, to allow safe access for kids and adults from the Pilot Knob elementary school to the central commons as well as from Four Oaks to both the elementary school and the Central Commons. Otherwise, we anticipate a serious increase in pedestrian/biker injuries. The city should consider how the campus could support School District 196 growth needs. Additionally, thought should be put into how the area could be redeveloped for a more robust community center to include raquetball, pickle ball, etc. the community center is nice, but ultimately does not have amenities equal to the size and need of the community as a whole. Because of the great proximity to the Commons, the ECC, medical, retail, grocery, etc., it would be a wonderful location for upscale, one -level senior housing (very similar to Evermoor in Rosemount). That would be the only housing I would recommend. I trust the City Council and planners. Do what you feel is best for the future of Eagan while keeping its residents your top priority. If possible, please ensure any new connections are made with bicycles as well as pedestrians in mind. We are never going to be Rosemount , with a walkable downtown. Let 's make sure we don't end up like Burnsville. Huge indoor park and pool. The parking for this venue could alleviate the parking issues in the summer when indoor area is less used. Honestly, the "Jobs on the Park" concept should be canned ASAP. Haven't those Delta and Unisys buildings stood vacant for quite a while? Shouldn't that be the indication that companies aren't keen on big office parks? The Central Park Village would invigorate Eagan in ways never seen before. Instead of bulldozing farm land for McMansions like Woodbury is doing, we choose to build a livable, workable, walkable space that the entire city can enjoy. We generate maximum tax revenue to fund similar redevelopment and maintain the high standard of living that we've cultivated thus far. We do our part to combat climate change by eliminating parking lots, building more green spaces, and curbing car dependency. Concept 2 is the winner. I really hope it comes to fruition. Again build a dome on that area. Take existing building and Move ALL City services to a Main area.. Much like the Rosmount proposal for their city. Don’t want to see this area turn into Ford Parkway redevelopment . Cars will become less important for city design. Neighborhoods will become key and therefore each neighborhood should become more of its own self-contained village, with its own character. Balance, mixed use, walkability will be important . Ties to trails and mass transit will become more important . Thank you for your efforts! No Please use other platforms and communication of what’s going on with this project besides the city of Eagan website and Facebook. And ECC literature. Residents aren’t aware of this project due to them being busy and not reading the website, watching council meetings, and or not having an ECC 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 45/78 membership and not going there. Take an ad out in the Sun Current , send out mailed hard copy fliers to all residents. I am concerned with all the loss of green space throughout the city that has been turned into housing, whether it is single family homes (like on Diffley a few years ago) or additional apartment buildings. I also think the city should focus on increasing job opportunities and increasing the tax base. As a resident who has had some of this urban housing developments built near me it needs to stop. Good options prevented. Option 2 seems best for the residents, city and a thoughtful use of the land. There are enough empty buildings in town that can be edone for businness that need more space, both old and newer buildings. No. Please consider high-end detached townhomes. No more apartments. The school district right there can’t handle an influx of kids from apartments anyways. By far prefer the Park Runs through it . Really do not like 2 other concepts and what appears to be excessive development . All three options are horrible that will result in buildings sitting empty. Building office space is not going to be sustainable in anyway. More quality jobs will be remote than in person in the long run. Try solving the current crisis of getting Thompson Reuter or Blue cross leased out . Providing roads & paths to ensure good traffic flow & safe & easy routes for bikes and pedestrians should be a priority (unlike in Central Park Commons which is a nightmare for pedestrians & bikers & not good for divers). Also, not directly related, but it would be great to add an indoor pool to the ECC. Ample parking but not inside park walking/biking areas. Availability for street market events, learning and entertainment events. Community oriented. It seems like de -emphasizing corporate campuses and other corporate office space given the overall trend of office space reduction and the decreasing footprint of corporate offices in Eagan in particular (e.g., Delta, Unisys, Argosy, Thomson Reuters, and BCBS). Eagan's commercial real estate and office mix is not aligned with current market needs. We need more housing (especially starter homes) to help meet the housing crunch in the Twin Cities and address that market gap. pickle ball courts are a draw It is really important to consider the value of green space for resident "quality of life", environmental reasons, and perhaps educational opportunities. Dont lose site of the value in becoming a green space destination city rather than an attempted revenue focused in & out city. Rugby fields changed to something more usable for more citizens. No retail or low income housing in or near the park. nO In the video we talk about looking out 20-40 years, planners really need to get innovative about how we re -attract large companies. Plans focused on housing, more Eagan retail and just converting more to park space feel like the easy way out and short-term. A lot of people are working from home today, but a lot of employers don’t love that . Could we build a unique concept where we tailor this area to companies like that and build a high tech campus with satellites for Silicon Valley or NY based companies? Why in the world is ANYONE's RACE either important or relevant to this discussion? Shame on you. Overall I am most interested in the park and retail. I also think Eagan needs more and better restaurants. Adequate and close parking is always important to me as well. All of your "concepts" relating to the argosy property have the same housing and office additions, with fewer parking places, We need the parking if there are going to be large events in the park, such as the farmers market and funfest , etc. It feels like all of the concepts are extremely dense and will increase traffic without increasing parking. There are SO many apartments around. We have been ECC members for years, and I love having all the fun usable outdoor space right in the heart of things. We would love some more retail and more park. The housing should go elsewhere. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 46/78 The more green space the better! I take to my child to multiple Eagan parks. I find it 's best to avoid parks directly next to large housing developments, as overnight activities on the playgrounds increases the odds of my child playing among baggies previously containing a suspicious substance, cigarette butts, glass, and cans le on and and the play equipment . more one level townhomes (with basement , not on slab) and fewer apartments Has the council considered the amount of housing they have or want to add and the current and future ground water situation? I am concerned that they are adding too many homes and we won't be able to handle the increase on our groundwater supply If there needs to be a housing component would like to see it a little more upscale. Enough with the dense apartment buildings. Regardless of if it's this space or elsewhere, seeing a coworking space somewhere within Eagan would be very cool (example: the coven in mpls/st paul). I feel as if that would bring in more people and business for local retailers/restaurants. With the increase in the popularity of remote work (which will likely only increase) focusing heavily on traditional office spaces doesn't seem like the smartest way to move forward with development . I would also suggest evaluating how traffic moves in the area as I've almost gotten in accidents around central park commons during marketfest /busy shopping days as people just don't seem to understand how to navigate that area properly, and with additional traffic I can only see that getting worse. YOU HAD BETTER NOT CREATE A DEVELOPMENT IN WHICH PINE RIDGE ROAD IS EXTENDED INTO HOUSING OR WHATEVER ELSE YOU THINK YOU NEED! Please strongly consider the safety of young families and children on Pine Ridge Drive. The road connecting Pine Ridge Dr to the new development will drastically impact the quality of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood. I would not support any concept that includes this. Central Park Village a close 2nd. NO more low income housing. !!!!!!!!!! As I said before, please do not put low income housing in there. And it’s not right to take away someone’s private land. One main reason for the Park was to have FIREWORKS, sky high and a July 4th celebration which brings together our community. It' needs more parking, so how about using the Delta lot for more, take out the hill/berm between park and old Delta .for easy access. The Rugby field was not in the original plan. Finally you found another place for it aer alll these years. Great! Make the roads wider all the way around those buildings & it cones out at Pilot Knob again. Adding lots of housing would make it as difficult as it is now to leave the area aer a celebration. Not sure of the situation with Delta land or Unisys. Can the city buy some of the property? We need the Argosy parking also. Once we lose the land, we can't get it back. Another referendum? Do we let the Vikings take over all the celebrations. They will charge for everything. They will make money and we lose our Central Park. I am sure there will be other citizens with great ideas. Don't give up making Central Park bigger and better for the future. Some of us worked very hard to get that land, etc .GOOD LUCK------------------------- I live in the osland timberline neighborhood. Please do not put a connecting street to the neighborhood north. One of the biggest values we had in moving here was the quiet neighborhood with no major traffic. In my opinion, it doesn’t even solve much from a traffic perspective anyway, because people would have to turn off of a busier street like pilot knob or 13… just to come through our neighborhood. It’s not asking much to just use pilot knob as you entry point as it exists today. The neighbors in this neighborhood do not need a street connection. If anything, a path would be nice. Also- my kids love the idea of a ropes course or zip line. I would love to see a small dog park considered as well. Opening up the Oslund Timberline neighborhood via Pine Ridge Drive is not necessary. This area is heavily used by pedestrians - residents & nearby neighbors- especially children. Opening this up to increased traffic at all hours of the day is dangerous & disruptive & will make the residents less safe. The current access has handled high traffic volume when Delta and Unisys occupied the space - it would be better to modify that access. The Pine Ridge Drive access has not been pointed out at all & is seeming to fly under the radar on the drawings - kind of sneaky. There is already increased traffic on Lone Oak & we can expect more with the upcoming changes to that road as well. Goodbye quiet safe neighborhood - which is the reason we moved to Eagan & this particular neighborhood in the first place. As a long time resident who lives directly behind this space we are very concerned 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 47/78 about the changes proposed & how it will affect our neighborhood. There has been no direct contact from the city regarding these changes, which there should be considering they will directly affect us. I love Centennial Lakes in Edina if that concept can be considered. centennial lakes has ample walking paths, shaded areas, lake, swinging benches, and outdoor activities. There are also retail/restaurants and housing but park/lake is the main focus. Thank you for redeveloping this area! The need for affordable housing is so high right now I hope that some of the units will be affordable housing. Also, I think public parks are vital for a healthy community so I'm happy to see the park is preserved. Walking and biking are great ways to stay healthy as well as commute. I would love to see more designated bike lanes/routes for commuting! I strongly disagree with the Noth Road access point . This is going to destroy our neighborhood and make our quiet neighborhood dangerous for our children All 3 plans include adding roads to Pine Ridge Drive. Why is this needed? This isn't being communicated well and seems to be hidden on purpose. There were two large employers there before and the road was never needed. The addition of a road is going to drastically increase traffic through a neighborhood that has attracted people who liked that it was an isolated area with no through traffic. There are a lot of young families living in the Oslund Timberline development . Seniors from the neighboring Timberwood Trail housing area use Red Cedar Road, Woodlark Lane, Pine Ridge Drive, and McCarthy Road for exercise and they will also be affected. And nearby townhomes use it for walking and running as well. The additional road will make the area much more unsafe for pedestrians and drop property values. It will also likely increase traffic by Pilot Knob Elementary which adds more safety concerns. A compromise would be a pedestrian/bike path instead of a road. It also looks like the housing is crammed right up next to existing residences on the north and east . Adding endless townhomes and apartments may get the city the most revenue but it takes away from the spread out feeling that attracts many of us to Eagan. It is a lot of housing in a small area that clashes with nearby neighborhoods. I fear it will make us feel like all of the open space was replaced by a wall of housing encroaching on our properties. With so many areas opening up in Eagan, It would seem like adding green space to Central Park would be a great idea instead of pushing so much in the area. Add some single family housing, some townhomes and a little bit of retail along Pilot Knob. Use Blue Cross Blue Shield for a mix of housing and small commercial/retail. Thompson Reuters would be a great place for a large corporate office with a lot of space and easy road access. I would like to see an option with NO housing. Eagan is already getting to be over-populated and the crime rate is rising because of it . I am considering moving away from Eagan in the next year because it just isn't the quiet , safe place it once was. Consider moving the Wescott Library to this site. They need more space for study, meetings, outdoor programs, etc. I DO NOT want any North Road access entry into Oslund Timberline. Safety is the biggest concern. I can extrapolate data if needed to back up the safety issue surrounding any proposal for a road. Children's safety, pedestrians, dog walking, night running, number of new cars cutting through etc. Pass this to City Council. I will write this for any option. Thank you- Our neighborhood doesn't want this. You need to gather our feedback via coming to our neighborhood for a meeting, or setting up a date & time at the ECC exclusively for Oslund Timberline to share our feedback. I can say that all neighbors have been talking, and no one wants this. It's an emphatic NO from all neighbors. I would like to see all car access still come in from PIlot Knob. I have heard that you may be adding a road to Red Cedar, which doesn't seem to be called out in any of these plans, but I would object to that . Also, with adding all these neighborhoods, will Pilot Knob Elementary have to expand again? And what does that do to traffic on Lone Oak, the road in front of the school already can't handle drop off and pick up times. Do not connect to Red. Cedar rd We live in Eagan since August 1991, and currently in a new house we built on Pilot Knob Road, right across the street from Unisys. This older neighborhood needs a kick of progress and improvement . For instance, new zoning laws should get rid of the houses with 13 (yes, 13 and counting) vehicles parked on the property. An improved commons area will help restore pride to surrounding owners to encourage them to improve their homes and lots through increased property value. Finally, I'll bet that none of the city council realize how difficult it is for the young and old to walk across that great divide named Pilot Knob Road easily and safely. Try it . Just consider these proximal neighbor issues when developing the new and improved "Eagan Commons". 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 48/78 Do not assume cars are going away – provide parking. That appears to be lacking in all three options. Remember to determine what people want , not what you or I think they want . So you ask "what kind of housing would you like to have available here?" Not " which size apartment or condo complex would you like." Incidentally, I live about a block from central commons at Applewood Pointe. We have been Eagan residents since 1972. Our parks are a heritage from our founding leaders in the 50-60's and continued by Eagan leaders to this day. Please keep improving and adding more park space and planting trees. It would be nice to have more tree lined trails for walking and biking. As our average summer temps go higher, people need more shade. I bike (2,500mi/yr) on area trails, but when its hot I ride fast out of Eagan's sun drenched trails and seek tree canopy trails like Big Rivers trail head (Mendota) to Harriet Island, which is about 8 mi of tree canopy. We need more Eagan park space, tree lined trails. I would also like to add a comment about Eagan's trails and sidewalks. The past 3 years there have been many new improved paving that is smooth surface and safer to ride like: Silver Bell Rd, Wescott Rd, Diffley Rd, Hwy 13, and the new Cliff Rd trails. The transitions with handicap red tiles (Neenah Co) between roadbed and onto the trail are very smooth to ride. If riding instead on the roads in bike lanes, the new roadbeds like Deerwood are very well marked. Thanks to all in the City that planned and made these trails and roads better and safer. Build even more housing Please consider a hospital. There is too much density around the whole area, do not want more added. Rather than going to the retail stores by Central Park, I go to surrounding suburbs. I don't shop in Eagan. The Hy-Vee parking is insane, too small. The surrounding stores are packed together in odd ways and it is very dangerous to drive. There are an insane amount of multi apartment dwellings and hotels behind the Aldi area. Common sense was not used when the whole area was developed. I hate to see more congestion. The city has not been planned well. Remove proposed road between Pine Ridge and Red Cedar Road. The north entrance to park (new) is going to bring in a lot more traffic to that neighborhood (which I reside in.) I am not opposed to its addition, however, the neighborhood is opposed to it and I think there needs to be strong consideration in how an entrance there needs to be supported with sidewalks an other traffic considerations to keep that area safe for pedestrians. Please leave timberline neighborhood out of the development . While I enjoy living in Eagan, one of the things I miss is having a "downtown" feel. There are a variety of strip malls and different shopping complexes, but when people thing "Eagan", what and where do they think about ? For Edina, you have 50th and France or Southdale/Centennial Lakes/Galleria. Hopkins has a downtown main street . Wayzata and Excelsior have beautiful downtowns on the lake. Currently St Paul is adding a new area on Ford project 122 acre site. But where is Eagan? I'd argue there is no downtown or mainstreet currently in Eagan. with 79 acres available for development , I would love for the City to dream a little bigger than just a park with splash pads and some apartment buildings and think about how we could foster a true "city center". It doesnt mean there needs to be 20 story buildings or crazy density. But creating a few streets with an avenue or boulevard feel, appropriate set backs, and the right mix of retail, housing, and green space, we could make a true center of activity- some place we can all claim to be the heart of Eagan. And someplace that would be a destination for others to come visit our city! Centennial Lakes in Edina used to be a gravel pit- and now it is an amazing asset not only for city residents but people drive from all across the metro to enjoy this space. Also, when I was an Edina resident , I spent~2014-2018 as a neighborhood representative working alongside developers , business owners and city officials on a Greater Southdale Area plan, the Southdale small area plan, and the Edina comprehensive plan for 2020. We worked very closely with Mick Johnson from Architectural Field Office, who I would highly recommend. I am not sure what the structure is of your work group, but I would be interested in contributing if possible. Julie Detlefsen- 952-217-7599- juliedet3@gmail.com It may not look like it but the area is already high density residential/commercial. I actually question the addition of even more commercial space with all of the empty buildings within just a few miles. As an open space proponent , I always like to see additional park land considered. Concept 3 provides a nice balance of commercial, residential, and additional park land. I would prefer that the parkland is maximized while attracting employers to CURRENT buildings. NO HOUSING in this site. Maximize Eagan Community Center by building a POOL, a core missing 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 49/78 element driving people to join other clubs. EXPAND GREEN SPACE and NO HOUSING. City has already ruined wetlands by Moonshine park with low income housing next to expanded apartments. There's enough housing near Central Park. Develop affordable housing under the insane airport noise runs and next to the industrial areas off Lone Oak Road or near other restaurants, hotels and things. EXPAND CENTRAL PARK greenspace, NO HOUSING, add a pool to the ECC. Keep it the same. The park is nice and doesn’t need to be developed at all. We don't need more packed in housing/ apartments I like how safe central Park feels. With additional housing, how might that affect things? No more banks, grocery stores, luxury apartments and chain retail crap. No one wants it . Literally not a single person. Please require high end classic and sustainable architecture. Make it something that we can be proud of as Eaganites. The Gathering Place in Tulsa has received national recognition and become a destInation for families. Please take a look. This would serve as great inspiration. https://www.gatheringplace.org/ STOP MESSING WITH OUR GREEN SPACES Please preserve our accessible green space. Please stop adding high density housing and empty corporate space. Please expand single family homes if we are taking green space. No Empty offices can be torn down and used as parkland. We do not need more housing of any kind. Traffic is already getting bad. Be mindful of the number of cars and no way to widen the roads. Don’t let tax revenue greed ruin a great city by creating an urban metropolis. We need green spaces to enjoy community events and come together. Apartments attract greedy developers and manage ment companies. We don’t need more business space. We can’t lose our community because we commercialized it . Eagan would not be the same. Keep as much green as possible. Lessen the impact on the environment Eagan does not need to lose anymore park space for useless retail and more housing. We need to utilize our land for useful thing for the community that are lacking like facilities such as a dome and park land and Sports complex. Sports complex and dome can be rented for income year round and used by community and can maintain park land too. Instead of more mass produced mass housing and retail just to see dollars, these are things that can bring money in but also invest in Eagan which is what has not been done for this city for a very long time. There will always be a need for housing and retail. But we only have so much natural land. Consider taking all the land and converting it back to a park or a preserve. Is that housing and land going to be empty in 20 years like other properties we have in Eagan? Blue Cross Blue Shield, Thompson, etc. Turning it into a park or natural area will keep it being used for decades and better for our environment . Keep eagan a family city, not a business city Put in a 50M indoor pool. Draw revenue from local swim teams, swimming lessons, and recreation. Stop adding housing - that area is already overdeveloped with all of the apartments you allowed to be built . Why not create a larger green space? Why the need for additional housing or corporate space at the park, when so many corporate locations in Eagan already stand empty? Why do none of these plans include leaving the park as is, or potentially expanding to these available spaces? We will not be a highly ranked “place to live” if housing becomes too dense. A pool at the community center to be used year round would be nice for current and new residents The bluff should become public property regardless of plan, they should be accommodated for this. Housing is going to be a bigger need long term than business use. In fact Eagan is going to have a longer term problem with excess buildings/business use soon enough. NO THROUGH ROADS TO OSLUND TIMBERLINE NEIGHBORHOOD For all concepts, strongly dislike high density housing. lower density housing is preferred. Large parking lots needed for high density housing is generally not environmentally friendly and will greatly detract from any views from the park (this also includes tall buildings). Really like the idea of 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 50/78 more park area and more walking paths throughout . Restaurants near the area, with the ability to enjoy a meal in the park would be nice. Housing by a corporate campus might be a major pro for some businesses. For example, in Wisconsin, Epic has corporate housing near its campus. The most important consideration for me was safety, and that was not included as an option in this survey. Residents in my neighborhood gave feedback to the City Council and planners about prioritizing the safety of Eagan residents and moving the inlet of a business out of the neighborhood to Pilot Knob Road. Unfortunately, Mike Maguire dismissed their concerns in the same meeting and said they were being anti-growth/jobs. His dismissive attitude and DWI record show that he does not comprehend the importance of public safety and road safety in the community. Adequate logistics and coordination can easily and greatly increase safety in the park while also growing jobs, but it's unfortunately dismissed in meetings. Adding so many people to the park makes it distracting and harmful for the kids at play. As predators will be more brazen. Really need a more accessible community center for kids to gather. Add a place to get ice cream More park space Do not build an access road to alone Oal via Pine Ridge drive. The increased traffic will disrupt the neighborhood and endanger kids. High density housing will also hurt the neighborhood in terms of noise issues and value. I would love to see some housing options for adults with disabilities. This would be a great location for this underserved population. Please keep green space! Enough with the high density housing and chipping away slowly at our parkland. People living in the suburbs don't want to live in areas with high density housing if we did we would move closer to the cities we stay in the suburbs to avoid high density housing and to enjoy the plethora of parks. Please do not impact the Oslund Timberline neighborhood! I would also like to recommend a new compost site :) my family wants to compost but the closest drop off is by Lebanon hills so while still in Eagan it is not convenient to drop of compost 15 min away There are rental townhomes just to the south of the rugby fields that I would hope would not be impacted by these changes. It would also be very beneficial to the city and equitable to all for reasonable pricing on housing and not to drive up prices based on amenities and access to the area. Stop developing the natural areas of Eagan I wish an addition to the community center was an option. We attend many events in Inver Grove Heights because they have a pool. Do not add work spaces or housing. We don't need that . Adding to the park or leaving it as is is, in my opinion, the best option. Add indoor pool to community center. No Business or housing! No high density or low income housing. More space for businesses. Please. please do not turn the vacant lot into a road. This neighborhood is strongly against it . Furthermore, all of these plans greatly impact the neighborhood, but it does not seem like an adequate effort has been made to inform the neighborhood of the changes, their impact to the neighborhood, or taking their opinions into account . Please do everything possible to keep and even expand natural spaces that all of the Eagan community can enjoy. Eagan has lost so much green space to development over the past thirty years. If this area is really a "commons," then it should be accessible to all, not just the people who move into new housing there. Do not add roads from Red Cedar Rd, neighborhood into Central Park area Don’t touch it Just make it a gathering place for families to enjoy enough of cheap houses and apartments. No retail there is plenty of empty properties around . If people wanted to open a business in Eagan show them the empty buildings . Eagan needs more nature no concrete. Please make the area affordable and accessible. We will not get many more opportunities to expand our park system, we need to utilize it . 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 51/78 We are all for more jobs and housing, but the parks and quiet neighborhoods are why people love Eagan. Please dont ruin one of Eagans older, more interesting neighborhoods (mid-century homes!) that many family have moved into because of the unique homes and quiet safe family environment that would be completely ruined with a through street connected to hundreds if not thousands of new people zipping though. Thank you for listening. I think it would be great to expand Central Park to this area, with a variety of retail and restaurants. We need more community space - not more housing and corporate space. Put in tennis, pickleball, a community pool, outdoor education space. We moved to Eagan for it being family friendly. Please continue to improve this. Don't sell out to commercial and residential tax revenue. People can use pilot knob to get around to these locations, I do not believe a road should be built on pine ridge, It is going to cause a lot of congestion in the neighborhood and the nice quiet neighborhood that once was will no longer be. People will probably move with the road being place on Pine Ridge. I think things need to be done to the empty lots however pilot knob is just fine and can get to all locations from there. there was never an issue before so why change that ? I don't like any of these plans. They are tacky and uninspired. I really don't like the underhanded way that you're drawing in a new through road at pine ridge. It 's a huge change to an old neighborhood that is literally not mentioned in your plan. I can only assume that the info le out strategically. I specifically opposed the connection of Lone Oak to the development via Pine Ridge drive. As a recent resident to the Oslund Timberline neighborhood, myself and many other neighbors would prefer to preserve our neighborhood’s streets as there currently are. We are extremely concerned about neighborhood traffic, noise, safety, and potential reductions in property values. We currently have a quiet peaceful neighborhood where we have chosen to raise our family, and an access road through the neighborhood would not increase the quality of our lives. I imagine that that the project would take years to develop, and with small children, it would be unfortunate for these years to be spent under construction. Thank you for hearing my concerns. I will be sure to be involved with communications moving forward. Pine Ridge drive should NOT become a through street or access point to this new development . It would be completely unnecessary and ruin the secluded and quiet neighborhood. There are better access points and traffic should be diverted to more established roads(not through a residential area where people will abuse and misuse as shortcuts). This impacts neighborhood safety and the preservation of a beautiful neighborhood. Please answer all questions honestly and stop dodging the important questions. Driving access through Pine Ridge Drive should not be an option. A new bike path is being constructed at the end of Pine Ridge Dr and any additional traffic from this street can be disasterous considering this new walking/biking path. Pine Ridge Dr is a quite neighborhood street and street access between the Northwest Central Commons and this neighborhood should not be part of the plan. As a resident in the neighborhood to the north of this new plan, creating a pass through to this development from Pine Ridge Drive is directly putting our children in immediate danger. We already deal with speeding cars. Our neighborhood will not be able to handle this kind of traffic and it is beyond disappointing that we have not been personally made aware of what is happening. Been a resident for 23 years. Moved here because it was quiet . Does Eagan City Council really want to develop every inch of green space? I personally don’t want Eagan to look as congested as Apple Valley. STOP and think! I would like to see Eagan support the first of it 's kind sustainable housing development: Tree lined streets and moderate sized homes which can be shaded to minimize heat islands. Central solar array for power generation of the homes. Highest efficiency HVAC. Either at home EV charging or centrally located for all residents. Central waste, recycling and organics drop off for resident to minimize wear on streets. Could rain water be harvested and used for irrigation. Parking availability makes events at the park difficult to access. Focusing on improving bike access to the southwest part of town would help a bit but also having shared parking in the office/retail area would be helpful too. no Redevelopment of this abandoned space is fantastic Thanks for all the work you do! 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 52/78 No consideration given to construct a multi-use athletic/rec facility for youth programs (EAA) or some type of dome so the dollars spent by these Eagan programs stay in the city they are connected to rather being spent in other cities. This is a huge need right now. Bringing in more housing and more people means we also need more space for our youth athletics (Gyms, fields etc) EAA is already bursting at the seams and should be included in your plans. Do not connect Pine Ridge to the park. Stay out of Oslund Timberline neighborhood. Best neiborhood in Eagan, don't ruin it . I live on Pine Ridge Drive in the neighborhood directly North of this area. I am beyond upset about talks of a through street and I am insulted by the stuff you all want to cram into our immediate surroundings. I am not in the belief that leaving Delta & Unysis the way they are works for anyone. I expect some change. However, I like my quiet neighborhood. I like my view of the bluff, the natural valley and wildlife areas. I like the open skyline and the wonderful full grown trees. I want to see a plan that maintains that . Eagan green is becoming Eagan commercial/developed really fast and its heartbreaking. My husband and I are one of the dozens of multi-generational owners in our neighborhood and we are respectfully fighting these proposals that (as they stand) will negatively altar our neighborhood forever. Please hear our hearts cry and help us find the best development plan for everyone - especially those who live RIGHT HERE! In reviewing the plan, it states there was communication with parties that would be affected. As a resident of the Oslund Timberline neighborhood, I did not receive any direct communication from the City of Eagan. I found out about the proposal from a neighbor who distributed information. Max 750 housing units, 310,000 or LESS commercial space, PRESERVE THE BLUFF. No road connection from pine ridge. Stay out of timberline. It is a safe area with low traffic and we want to keep it that way Before adding housing, be sure the both the city and county services can handle the growth. Please keep environmental concerns top of mind in any decisions you are making. Adding more concrete to a world of global warming is foolish and totally unnecessary. There are plenty of roads as is. There is no need to "connect" neighborhoods with roads when we can easily walk or bike there . Please try to keep Eagan Green!! Bottom line for me is please do not connect these concepts to Red Cedar Road. It is just a waste and will damage a neighborhood for no good reason that I can see. Eagan does not need more high density housing. Single level townhomes for our aging population instead of apartments… Quality over quantity. Please keep a focus on nature and park spaces! Also consider adding a 2-3 mile walking path. I don’t like any of the plans as presented. The article in the City newsletter gave the impression of extending green space and emphasized the park. I welcome pedestrian and bike improvements, as well as green space recreation but I think there is lots of high density housing already available. I’m not naive about the need to generate tax revenue, but the plans as presented and the current state of available / empty office space doesn’t get me excited about how you’re approaching this opportunity. I try to be an engaged citizen and have participated in many surveys but I somehow missed your phase 1 input gathering or the survey was presented in such away that I don’t recognize how I would have responded reflected in these proposed plans. I intend to be actively engaged on this project moving forward. NO You have a strong presence who are against a road connecting to Pine Ridge Dr. Please include signage and enforcement of dog leashing (non-extender leashes), in this park and residential area. There seems to be an increase of people letting their dogs off leash or not keeping them nearby. My husband grew up in the Oslund/timberline neighborhood - his parents built their home in 1998 and have zero plans of moving. An opportunity arose in this neighborhood to purchase a home and we jumped on it . We love the community and the multi generations that inhibit it . Family is extremely important to us and we want to preserve our neighborhood and the safety of our families by not putting the road through to Lone Oak. We greatly appreciate the council and planners taking our feedback into consideration. We use the park for so many recreational things, it’s been awesome to hold events for the whole community. It would be fun to see different park features added. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 53/78 Strongly dislike the northern access road through Red Cedar. It is not entirely clear why you need a northern access road that parallels an already useful Pilot Knob Road. If a northern access wasn't needed when those three businesses were at their peak, then why would it be needed when most of the development will be dedicated to green space. The road would cut directly into a very old, quiet neighborhood for not much gain. Please do not extend Pine Ridge Rd. There is no reason to disrupt our quiet and peaceful neighborhood. As a wheelchair user, I feel safe in my neighborhood and take almost daily rolls through my neighborhood and around Pilot knob park and Central Park. I am however excited to have a new path as I can’t do the stairs by Unisys. Please leave the bluff. We are lucky to have that and the nature I oen observe while watching the area. The vegetation is also so pretty. I think the area is overdeveloped already and feel the area should remain natural park land We live in the mcCarthy Road neighborhood. We are strongly opposed to connecting McCarthy Neighborhood with The Northwest commons area. Routing Traffic from Northwest commons through our quite neighborhood (with many young families) will negatively impact all of us in the neighborhood and increase risk to the many young children. This is unjust to the surrounding neighborhoods filled with children… the future of our city to have to sacrifice their safe neighborhood for a unnecessary thru street when members of Eagan drive recklessly through neighborhoods where there are people walking, children playing, cars parked. This decision WILL drive many members of the timberline neighborhood to move to surrounding cities due to the unsafe environment to raise their children You found it necessary to install a stoplight on Lone Oak and Highway 13 to accommodate the large amount of semi and other traffic on this small stretch of road near Pilot Knob School. Please do not consider a north access road on Pine Ridge that would further increase the dangerous amount of traffic on this portion of Lone Oak Road that cannot be widened due to proximity of houses to roadway and steep inclines on either side,! No north access on Pine Ridge !!! Leave Pine Ridge drive as is. I live on Red Cedar Road and am strongly opposed to creating a road access to Pine Ridge Drive to the north. This is conveniently not stressed but has the potential to drastically increase traffic in a very quiet residential area to the detriment of long standing residents such as myself. I can envision all sorts of traffic that would not exist without the road access - including short cuts to Hwy 13 that would run right past my home. This is a long established quiet residential neighborhood that does not need to be subjected to such a dangerous increase in a variety of commercial uses. too many structures for my taste I found it interesting that you were not actively getting feedback from the timberline neighborhood with about 500 taxpayers and long term residents living there . Widening pine ridge road would bring in too much traffic and dangerous to the kids that live on the street and walk to pilot knob school. We are finally having young families buying homes in the neighborhood as long term residents down size. It’s a beautiful and private neighborhood that enjoys access to the park via pilot knob park area. We don’t need trafficehaving access, shortcutting up McCarthy road from hwy 13 area. As a homeowner in the surrounding area with young kids I question the need for added multi family housing. Many of us enjoy the quiet neighborhood and oen use the surrounding parks. We also have generational families in the neighborhood. If additional roadways are added through our neighborhood, we would have to reasses our desire to stay in the neighborhood with young children that walk and bike in the area. Be very careful you listen to residents as you work for us. All three options give the same development at the south end. This end is crammed with a commercial building and residential on both side of the commercial building. There is no overflow parking in any of these plans. The housing in this area should be eliminated and converted to permanent public free parking. Please don't make the housing too dense. One thing Eagan absolutely doesn't need is more office, retail or housing. What we need is more green space. Use the entire area to create a new Dakota County Park. Make the park bigger Expand the park 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 54/78 I would really like to see the green space survive. It is a beautiful area and there is getting to be less and less of that around Eagan. Please use this opportunity to make a space that isn’t just a cookie cutter suburban development . Make it a neighborhood feature or draw. Pilot Knob Rd is an artery in Eagan and drivers are more dangerous these days- less patience, tons of traffic, drivers going grossly over the speed limits and failure to stop at traffic signs, lights, etc... causing more accidents whether it's auto vs auto/pedestrian/bicyclists. I witness it everyday and I have to mentally prepare to deal with other drivers when driving and walking in this area. Having more residential and commercial occupancies in this area will not be beneficial safety wise and while I treasure the park and green spaces, what will an increase to increased foot traffic do to the habitat ? A Target in this area of Eagan would be great . Perhaps the Amazon store location they didn’t go in? Nice restaurant options (like Kitchen & Rail). No more fast food! Focus on jobs No more multiple unity housing and senior living centers. Don’t need more housing. Green space no more housing or shops Our community needs a sports complex with gyms. We either need to build one onto Eagan high school, or build a standalone complex at one of these sites. Almost every other community has something and we do not . Gym space is so limited, especially with the growth of pickle ball. This space would draw people to the area via sports tournaments. We do not need any more office complexes. There’s commercial real estate empty everywhere so build more? Eagan does not need any more housing or retail. There are many empty retail and commercial building which is an eyesore already. Focus on the citizens of Eagan and provide them options rather than outside sources. I have lived in Eagan for my entire 32 years and now am raising my children here. I want them to see that this city focuses on community. Leave things as is. If you must develop build more green space, grassy areas for flowers and wildlife. Would appreciate a continued focus on attracting independently owned business to the area. This will help foster a stronger sense of authenticity and uniqueness in the city. Eagan already has several big box retailers and chain concepts. No new roads through exciting neighborhoods The maps are deceptive. The title doesn't seem to match the layout . Balance is important to me. I like the park as it is--I do not want to see it too congested with parking problems for residents near the park or visiting the park. I realize a new plan is needed to develop the land, but we don't want to ruin the beautiful ambiance we now have. (I live across the street from Central Park and go there regularly.) Keep the design with a focus on a larger Central Park. Please do not destroy the neighborhood to the north by connecting Pine Ridge Drive to this new very busy area. 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 55/78 First and Last Name Sarah Erickson Derek Meyer Lisa gardner David Berthiaume John Koniges Lynette Johnson Eleanor richfield Emily Nguyen Ashley Hotchkiss Julie Jones Rebecca Carlson Jared Agerter Joan Stovall Rachel Anderson Belinda Cordina Susan Martin Steve Yahn Mikey Kroeger Joel Dennis Linda Bosma John McConnell Jae Cody Rick Casper R Rasmusson Kern Hough Tari Stordahl Heather Ennis Jesse Genson Earl Johnson Karen Debaun Melissa Casey Katie Harris Mark Frascone Jennifer Gessner Jon Hohenstein Jason Dresow Lance kuehn Jason Sharpe marlye riddel Ronald Gonzalez David Bohne Carol White 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 56/78 Eric Kraushar Nicholas Larson brad tetzloff Kelly Jones Mike Salkas Amanda Paul Sevenich Indy Rutks Samantha Broders Carla Winder Tim McNeil Kevin Hamlin Carla Winder Rick Lewis Matt Haugen Patti Engel Connie Buchholz Steve VanderWiel Lisa Nofzinger Steven Bornman Mike Rice Rebecca Peterson William Kvas Stephen Norton David Krueger Anon Ymous Kendra Vessey Linda Grafstrom Margaret Hinke Dr. George Kubik & Ginnie Kubik Toni Wickstrom Jacob Seljan Ellen Elhard Dan Jacobs Linda Klein Kyle Gulbrandson Eric Hart Andrew Wolpers Abby Smith Gladys Kim Jeff Schwalen Mary Niehaus Lynn Lewis Melissa Block Jeff Humphrey 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 57/78 Paul Nigon lynn sealey Glenn Renick David Sutliff Lisa McWilliams John Ruhland Tim Gaier Lindsey Zeno O.L.T. Lynn Stein Daniel Lebowitz Kevin Shannon Siva Reddy Amy Simonson Geoffrey Wehrman Susan Andrew Schroepfer Pat Felt- Gunderson Annie Tietema Jen LaFont Heidi Anderson Eric M. Strandjord Lynn Kroonblawd Kristen Boeke Rose Ann E. Mazierski Nora Makky Mike Langley Judy Huber Paul Malamen Coral luoma Brian Schiewe Sue Thorn Susie Buboltz Jenelle Jensen Jared Agerter Kasey Tunell Rick Bartusch Cheryl Boyd Sandra Parks Tim Zaayer Mark Wicklund Cheryl Moeller Karl Oestreich Mike Ferber Scott Schnobrich 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 58/78 Sally Bull Paul Wochnick Lisa M Lopez Michael Burch Thomas Bland John J. Keegan We need more townhouses for seniors with bedrooms on the main floor Katelyn Lindbery David Christian Marissa Duval Jason Oberhamer Kelly Losasso Dan Kassan Mary Resnikoff Laura Rapach Laurie Reding Brenda Thompson Sharon Battis Eric Maass Cindy Yanchury John Sealey James Ehrmann Sheryl Graham Mike Gorman Carole Hansen Alanna Ladd Eric Yohn John Geisen Donald P Props Trevett Cullers Jennifer Johnson Roxanne Glover Jeffrey Baumann Bryan Sternberg L ZAUN Terry Greyzck Michael Matzek Amanda Sauber Sigrid Lindholm John Sauber Joan Kappes Tom Miller Melanie Pearce Duyen Le kevin lindow 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 59/78 Natalie Lawrence Thomas Ferber E Fedeli - Eagan - resident 34 yrs Phi le Danielle Hermanny Megan Bard-Pankow Brad Vergin Nathan Swanson Andrea Llaurado Debbie DeMiglio Sandy Zingle Doug Bailey Barb Verville Bryan Knipe Steve Eisenberg Michelle Merryman Diane Olson Candace Lindow-Davies Stephanie Wallace Dan p Jeanne Bjergo Jason Sevr Terry Erlandsen Amanda Wise Ken Rivet Sue Knight William Egan Natalie Weber J Robinson Anita Pagey Michelle Beuthling John Doe Garrett Strand JOHN M. GUSTIN 3061 WOODLARK LANE Crystal Frank-Shannon David L Russ Rob Dykhoff Kristine Callahan Jenna Brandl Mary Jacobson Margo Danner Tiffany Brooks Abby Larson Ellie lee Shannon Woods 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 60/78 Josh Larson Chris Lehmann Roy Bell Bridget Sealey Teresa Bintner Neal Wetherall Tari Keene Philip Legendre Graham Roberts Joseph Fitzharris Paul Webb Rose Webb Mark Dobbelmann Michaelyn Kallas Mariyn DeMars Brandon Jutz M Gaudette Christos Jensen Kimberly Zamora Pearson Peter Cotroneo Julie Detlefsen Sue Grouws Steven Stemig Janet Williams Val Jackson Marsha Millonig Heidi Kennelly Randy d Nancy Chellman Anonymous Lynn O’Gorman Lauren Nahurski Tiffiny Grossbauer Brenda Brenberg Katie Schwartz Emily Frank Dan Hjulberg JM Schliecker Mackenzie Kerber Todd Johnson Lauren McKliget Kerry anderson I live at Applewood Pointe. Ryan Neary Peter Sappanos 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 61/78 Jake Sandquist John McComb Elizabeth Lyon James Bolton Allan Johnson Naomi Kirk Jason kirk Randy Besse Sean McHugh Sharon Meador Crystal McRandall Molly Schutz John scaduto Concerned Oslund Timberline Resident Tina Edlund Sarah Durfee A.Nelson Molly Sullivan Jill Lee Hubble Kelsey Frolik Tabitha Senty Hannah Dombeck Kelsey Nash Katie Jean Davey Miko H Nicole Felicelli Chris Marshall Michelle Drobnick Molly Davis Liza Whitmire Samantha Gray Stephen Dankbar Diana Evensen Mike Janssen Andrea Lauer Anne DeLambert Barbara Greer John Villaume Paul Hirsch Tim Boger Joyce Bartusch Paul Brower Heather Lorentz Peter and Patricia Leahy Bridget Sealey 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 62/78 Linda Stratton Brenda Marshall Liz miller Megan Mott Beth Villaume Jean Rausch Lynn Carlson Janet Zimmermann M.Weidmer Amy kainz Christopher jensen Daniel Spick Veronica Cotroneo Chad Brooks John Wagner Esther Neil Keane Roger stenson Amber Marianne Adelmann Ashley Brotzel Dennis Stern Carol Marbaugh Colleen Eichenberger Tom Joan Collado John Belter Michelle Ken Marbaugh Mary Jouppi Joe Mathews Heather Quisenberry Nicole Clapp Amy O'Connell Laurie Norman Michelle Machtemes Jenedee Miller Talitha Winker Irene Albert Jacqueline Moser Jennifer Shannon Luke Moe Matthew Wagner John Shannon Constance Hurd 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 63/78 Jeff Krueger Carol Shepherd 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 76/78 What is your gender ? Woman 64% (390) Man 35% (217) Identify in another way 1% (7) In which category is your age? 18-24 years 2% (10) 25-34 years 11% (66) 35-44 years 28% (174) 45-54 years 16% (99) 55-64 years 19% (117) 65-74 years 20% (123) 75 years or older 5% (33) 8/21/23, 8:46 AM Polco | Content https://polco.us/n/admin/content/435f577d-86fc-4bc9-b8f7-dc8d95992ce9/report 77/78 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaska Native 1% (4) Asian 2% (12) Black or African American 2% (10) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0% (0) White 91% (524) A race not listed 7% (39) Agenda Information Memo October 10, 2023 Special City Council Meeting IV. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Budget Update Direction for Consideration No formal action is needed. Staff will provide an update on the current status of the ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) funds received and uses to date. Staff will also outline a schedule and proposed spending plan for the use of ARPA funds. Facts  The City of Eagan received nearly $7 million in ARPA funds for Covid relief and recovery efforts.  The City Council approved the current ARPA Finance plan on December 20, 2022 which totaled $4.4M of needed capital.  Additional refinement of the plan is being continued based on City Council action, pandemic progression, United State Treasury’s issuance of the Final ruling (guidance of American Rescue Plan Act), and identified department needs by the Senior Management Team.  The Plan is devised to best spend the ARPA Funds by maintaining a spending plan in the spirit of American Rescue Plan Act.  The 2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report was recently presented to and accepted by the City Council at the June 6, 2023 meeting with 2022 results for the Enterprise Recreation funds being notably improved from the revised 2022 lost revenue projections that were presented. As a result, less supplemental ARPA funding was needed than previously anticipated.  Improved financial results for the recreation facilities diminish the need to replace the lost revenue for the Enterprise Recreation Funds with ARPA funds. Future year projections for the use of funds were decreased and revised to reflect the updated financial results which amounts to roughly $0.8 million in savings from the financial plan adopted in December.  Collectively, the items included in the ARPA financial plan total $6.13 million, with the additional capital requests totaling $955,000 that were added subsequent to the adopted plan in the December 2022.  The current plan shows remaining funds totaling $745,000. Staff is proposing to allocate the remaining funds to the Parks facility projects in 2024.  Staff will present a final draft in December to the City Council for formal action. Policy Questions for Consideration: 1.) Is the Council supportive of the current plan for utilization of the ARPA funds, including using the remaining funds for the Parks facility projects to lower the tax levy needed to support the bonds? 2.) Does the City Council have additional direction they would like to provide as it relates to the proposed ARPA plan? Attachments: IV‐1 Proposed ARPA Funds Finance Plan IV‐2 ARPA Plan project summary IV‐3 Slideshow presentation 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Beginning Cash 3,458,672 2,879,514 4,258,112 1,925,153 1,103,953 ‐ 2nd Allotment ‐ 3,458,672 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Investment Income 4,726 (44,468) ‐ ‐ ‐ (39,742) 1 Personnel Health ‐ COVID Leave Policy ‐ sick (106,930) (90,763) ‐ ‐ ‐ (197,693) ‐ Vaccine Incentive ‐ Vacation (25,164) (48,863) ‐ ‐ ‐ (74,027) 2 Hiring Incentive ‐ Parks/Rec (10,500) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (10,500) 3Lost Revenue ‐ Eagan Community Center (436,190) ‐ (200,000) (100,000) ‐ (736,190) ‐ Eagan Civic Arena (5,100) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (5,100) ‐ Cascade Bay ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 Technology Improvements ‐ Council Chambers and Eagan Room ‐ ‐ (300,000) ‐ ‐ (300,000) ‐ Audio/Video Improvements (Other Rooms)‐ ‐ (200,000) ‐ ‐ (200,000) ‐ IT/PWs ‐ ESRI upgrade ‐ ‐ ‐ (50,000) ‐ (50,000) ‐ GOVQA or Laserfiche for Data Requests ‐ ‐ (6,990) ‐ ‐ (6,990) ‐ Workflow Improvements (Laserfiche etc.)‐ ‐ ‐ (50,000) ‐ (50,000) ‐ Permit Software Upgrade (PIMS)‐ ‐ (147,000) ‐ ‐ (147,000) ‐ Noise Reducing system for Police ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ Financial Software upgrade ‐ Oracle ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (358,000) (358,000) ‐ Utility Billing Software ‐ ‐ ‐ (156,200) ‐ (156,200) 5 Green and Environmental Investments ‐ HVAC improvements ECC ‐ (746,484) (57,869) ‐ ‐ (804,353) ‐ Public Works ‐ Fuel system ‐ ‐ (587,100) ‐ ‐ (587,100) 6Other Initiatives/Capital purchases ‐ Parks and Rec ‐ Blackhawk well failure ‐ (82,391) ‐ ‐ ‐ (82,391) ‐ Parks and Rec ‐ Rahn Utility Relocation ‐ (11,988) ‐ ‐ ‐ (11,988) ‐ Fire ‐ 2 Fire Engines ‐ (1,000,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,000,000) ‐ Police ‐ Locker room ‐ (16,000) (234,000) ‐ ‐ (250,000) ‐ Police Radar speed trailers ‐ (39,116) ‐ ‐ ‐ (39,116) ‐ River Valley Acre (RVA) site improvement study ‐ ‐ (50,000) ‐ ‐ (50,000) 2023 Proposed new Projects ‐ Parks and Rec ‐ Trapp Farm Park Fiber project ‐ ‐ (25,000) ‐ ‐ (25,000) ‐ Parks and Rec ‐ Holz Farm house Chimney recon.‐ ‐ (15,000) ‐ ‐ (15,000) ‐ Parks and Rec ‐ Moonshine Park Retreat Center ‐ ‐ ‐ (40,000) ‐ (40,000) ‐ Moonshine park well reconditioning ‐ ‐ ‐ (75,000) ‐ (75,000) ‐ Central Park well repair ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ AED's for Parks ‐ ‐ (32,000) ‐ ‐ (32,000) ‐ Elevator recondensing and replacement ‐ ‐ (263,000) ‐ ‐ (263,000) ‐ Fiber to Goat property ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ ‐ (60,000) ‐ Police ‐ Alternative Light Source ‐ ‐ (35,000) ‐ ‐ (35,000) ‐ Police ‐ Emergency Response Vehicle ‐ ‐ ‐ (350,000) ‐ (350,000) Ending Cash 2,879,514 4,258,112 1,925,153 1,103,953 745,953 (6,171,391) ARPA Funds Schedule ‐ October 10, 2023 Workshop Summary of Proposed ARPA Funds Project Expenditures 2023 Proposed New Projects Trapp Farm Park Fiber Project  With the continuing need for finding a replacement polling location for elections, Trapp Farm Park was identified as a location that made a lot of sense and uses a park amenity that won’t impact operations.  Adding fiber to park shelter buildings has been a discussed CIP item for years and something that helps bring additional equity to the public in the form of free Wi‐Fi.  Wi‐Fi to these structures will assist with programs that will be established at these locations and brings value to rental opportunities in these public spaces. Holz Farmhouse Chimney Reconstruction  The Historic Farmhouse at Holz Farm recently suffered significant damage to the chimney and needs replacement.  This was not a budgeted item, and repair is important to maintain the historic structure in working order.  Fixing this allows for continued use of the kitchen by the Friends of the Farm for events at the farm. Moonshine Park Shelter Building Improvements  The deck at the retreat center/park shelter building has reached its end of life and needs replacement. Staff is identifying the most financially efficient, but also safest replacement that will support operations at this site. Moonshine Park Well Improvements  The well at Moonshine Park Retreat Center has been declining and is past due for replacement. Replacing the well continues to allow for the use of this structure for both programming, rentals and public use. Central Park Well Repair  Similar to Blackhawk Park Well reconditioning, the well at Central Park that provides support to the park operations at this key city site is degrading quickly and needing to be reconditioned.  Efficiencies in water management and quality will result in this reconditioning. Equipment is starting to be negatively impacted with sediment due to the failing well integrity. AEDs for Parks  Since COVID, outdoor use of parks is at record levels. With this higher usage comes higher risk of cardiac arrest.  In collaborating with both the Fire Department and Police Department after a medical incident at Rahn Park where the AED was used, all parties support the implementation of AEDs across the park system into our highest used parks.  Locations to be considered for these include the following parks: Central, Blackhawk, Trapp, Sky Hill, Bridle Ridge, Goat Hill, Ohmann, Lex‐Dif, Thomas Lake, and Northview Parks. Elevator Reconditioning and Replacement  The elevators at City Hall failed to meet testing requirements in 2023; and after researching the new standards, a complete replacement of the elevators at both the Police Department and City Hall is recommended as the best option. Fiber to Goat Hill Park Property  Once a new shelter building is finished at Goat Hill Park in 2024, this will be one of our signature destination sites for year‐round recreation.  Adding fiber and Wi‐Fi to this location will enhance the public experience significantly, while also making for more consistent rentals and program options.  Having more public Wi‐Fi sites throughout the city in the park system enhances the equity across our city. Police Emergency Response Vehicle  With the increase in gun related incidents, the police department is seeking a vehicle that would provide a layer of protection for citizens and police officers during these types of situations.  The police department would use the vehicle during active shooter events, situations where the presence of a gun has been noted and during civil unrest with the potential for violence. The vehicle could also be used as part of community engagement events in the city to highlight the work that is being done in policing to protect the community and officers.  The added layer of protection will provide department members with the necessary tools to slow incidents down while de‐escalation efforts are ongoing during crisis situations.  It is anticipated that this vehicle would need to be replaced every 20‐25 years, which is consistent with similar type vehicles in the fleet. Police Alternative Light Source  This is an all‐in‐one camera, magnifier, alternate light source (infrared and ultraviolet light, beyond the visible light spectrum) and barrier filter assortment in one.  The police department will use the camera at crime scene team to search, document and collect blood, body fluids, fingerprints, hairs and gunshot residue.  The handheld device is compact and designed to be used by one person. Presented in 2022 (Updates in bold) City Council Chambers and Eagan Room Technology Improvements  Provide more reliable broadcasts and equipment.  Less staff needed for productions, increased public access, transparency, accessibility, and reduced maintenance costs.  Will allow public “hybrid” meetings where people can participate remotely and in person.  2023 update – The project is in the very final stages of the design process and preparation for the bidding process has begun. ESRI upgrade Utility Network Model Architecture  ESRI software inventories, analyzes and architects a variety of assets that the City owns and maintains such as Utilities, Streets, Parcels, Water Resources, and Fiber Infrastructure resources.  The ESRI upgrade to the Utility Network Model architecture would increase performance, quality control and add new capabilities when maintaining complex utility‐based GIS data with a variety of attributes.  ARPA funds will help staff research, prepare, and transition to this new model. GovQA or Laserfiche for Data Requests  There is a need for a more central and formal process for Police and Administration to receive data requests.  Online solutions would provide an easier way for requestors to request and receive their data.  A better reporting system to track data and to easily compile reports for council or staff.  2023 update – Cost of the replacement software was $6,990 and below the $50,000 budget. Software has been implemented and is in use. Laserfiche Workflow Improvements  In 2020, the City made a significant investment to upgrade the licensing of our Laserfiche (document archiving) software to provide us capabilities of using the workflow features to ingest documents into an online system.  Workflow improvements would increase the productivity of our staff members that review, append, and ingest data into the Laserfiche system. Workflows automate processes and eliminating manual tasks such as manually saving each document into the Laserfiche repository. It also reduces errors in entry of data into the system and improves transparency and control over data accessibility.  The City currently has two workflow processes in place, Human Resources onboarding and the Historical Society archiving. ARPA funds would be used to assist multiple departments design new workflows that will increase their document archiving productivity.  2023 update – Funds are being requested to be moved from 2023 to 2024 with planned implementation of workflow functionality for a variety of departments in 2024. New Permitting Software  Replacement of existing LOGIS permitting software (PIMS)  Purpose is greater transparency for customers, more efficient workflow processes, better mobile capabilities, and improved integration with other systems  Permitting software is used by many departments for a variety of purposes. Selection will involve an intradepartmental work group.  2023 update – The original implementation budget of $255,000 was reduced to $147,000 based on results of the proposals received and contract signed in 2022. Implementation is currently in process. Noise Reducing System  Inadequate sound mitigation was installed during the construction of the building.  Assists in quieting the building as noise travels between areas and ensures that the public will not hear staff discussing investigative matters or private data  2023 update – Added $30,000 to the budget for a total of $60,000 as a better estimate to include conference rooms, administrative areas and other sensitive areas. Financial Software  LOGIS membership is currently in the process of reviewing responses to an RFP (request for proposals) for new financial software that includes accounting, human resources, payroll, accounts payable, budgeting modules to replace our current suite of financial software applications.  The City of Eagan has used the LOGIS‐supported and locally‐hosted software (JD Edwards, Hubble) for over 20 years.  Web based software is proposed with many new features that would provide great value to the finance and HR teams while also providing value to other departments and the citizens of Eagan with increased functionality and efficiencies.  2023 update – The original implementation budget for both utility billing and Financial/Human Resources totaled $800,000. Results of the proposal process conducted by LOGIS and its membership resulted in a savings of $285,800. Software implementation has now just begun with other LOGIS membership, and the City of Eagan is slated to go‐live in 2025 for Financial and Human Resources modules. The utility billing software, Sprypoint, contracts were recently approved with the scheduling of implementation is to occur this month. HVAC for the Eagan Community Center (ECC)  The mechanical system for the ECC is original and was beginning to fail in 2020, and after consulting a Commercial HVAC specialist, it was recommended to replace system.  Efficiencies should be gained with a new system, along with predictability of performance, which is critical in a building that hosts large conferences, weddings, family gatherings, and fitness operations.  The energy management system will also be updated and allows for all our mechanical systems to be on the same online management platform for staff to program more consistently.  2023 update – Project is nearing completion and is expected to be closed‐out in 2023. Fuel System  Located at the Central Maintenance Facility, serves all City‐owned vehicles and equipment.  Two 10,000‐gallon unleaded fuel tanks and one 10,000‐gallon diesel fuel tank.  Existing fuel tanks installed in 1987, located underground. Recommended life cycle = 30‐years (reduce risk of fuel leaks).  2023 update ‐ Budget Increased from 255,000 to $587,100. Project is almost finished and resulted in soil contamination that may cost the city an estimated $30k for remediation efforts. Blackhawk Well replacements with Fresh Water line  The Blackhawk pavilion and bathroom structure has had chronic maintenance issues. Staff were told by the well company that a new well would not be a guarantee as a fix because of challenges at the aquifer level with large amounts of sediment, etc. Staff worked with Utilities to run a freshwater line from the west to replace this utility need for the location.  Solution is complete and water service at one of our most highly used parks is set for decades.  2023 update – project is complete and under budget by $17,609. Rahn Utility Relocation Project  Concurrent with Rahn Park Building Project in 2022, this was identified early in as an issue where the water line/sewer line would be directly under the new covered patio.  Infrastructure modifications to this caliber were not built into the parks CIP budget for this line item and qualified for ARPA consideration.  Project allows access to utilities without having to impact new covered pavilion for this site.  2023 update – project is complete is under budget by $18,012. Fire Engines  ARPA Funds were used to pay for the replacement of two fire engines in lieu of a bonding.  2023 update – Fire engines were originally slated to be completed by 2023, however production is now delayed, and delivery is scheduled for the end of the second quarter in 2024. Police Locker Room  The women’s locker room space is full.  The proposed additional space will address current locker shortages and future space needs.  Increase in construction costs resulted in the need for additional funding project completion.  2023 update – Project is nearing completion with final payment to be released in 2023. Radar Speed Trailers  The current speed trailer is over 10 years old and needs to be returned daily to charge. Two new trailers are proposed for purchase.  The new units can be used year‐round and have security functions that will allow the department to keep both units out 24‐hours per day.  Real time data can also be obtained versus waiting to download the data when the current trailer is returned.  2023 update – trailers are purchased and in the field. River Valley Acre (RVA) Site Improvement Study  The proposed study will address needs at the City’s RVA site, including: o Site Grading & Drainage (includes Storm Water best management practices) o Sewer Dumping Station & Vehicle/Equipment Storage o Public Safety Training Enhancements  2023 update – a draft RFP is currently being circulated for review at the staff level and will be issued in the next month. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds October 10, 2023 City Council Workshop ARPA Funds - Overview March 11, 2021 – President Biden signed the act City of Eagan allocation - $ 6.9 million Funds were released in two payments -July 2021 and 2022 ARPA Funds - Overview Funds must be obligated by December 31,2024 and spent by December 31, 2026. Unexpended funds must be returned to the Federal Government Final ruling issued January 2022 Standard allowance for revenue loss of $10 million Spending plan maintains the spirit of the ARPA ARPA Funds - Overview Pandemic Spending Priorities o Replace lost revenue o Address Public health o Community-wide Capital Improvements - One-time proceeds for community asset improvements - Investment into technology ARPA Funds - Overview Enterprise Funds - lost Revenue results were improved by $800k in 2022 vs earlier estimates Current plan contemplates the use of $300k for the Eagan Community Center Collectively, the ARPA plan totals $6.13M of expenditures with the addition of $955k of new capital requests ARPA Funds – Capital Requests Summary: Building Facilities City Hall Elevator maintenance Parks and Recreation Fiber – Goat Hill Park and Trapp Farm Park facilities Moonshine Park retreat center maintenance Well repairs and reconditioning – Moonshine and Central Parks AEDs for Parks Police Investigative Alternative Light source Emergency Response Vehicle ARPA Funds – Capital Requests Future consideration for remaining funds Parks Facility Projects – use funds to lower bonding levels ARPA Funds – Policy Questions 1)Is the Council supportive of the current plan for utilization of the ARPA Funds, including using remaining funds for the Parks facility projects to lower the tax levy needed to support the bonds? 2)Does the City Council have additional direction they would like to provide as it relates to the proposed ARPA Plan?