Loading...
09/13/1988 - City Council SpecialMINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL September 13, 1988 A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, September 13, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center building in the office of the City Administrator. Present were Mayor Ellison and City Councilmembers Egan, Gustafson, McCrea and Wachter. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and City Planner Dale Runkle who appeared during the Cray Research and Rahncliff items. CRAY RESEARCH PRESENTATION Several representatives, including consultants and corporate representa- tives appeared on behalf of the Cray Research project for the purpose of providing a status update on their building program to the City Council. Mr. Dale Beckman, an engineer with BRW and Associates, represented Cray Research presenting development plans relative to a revised phasing of the Cray Research campus development proposal. He stated that three buildings are initially planned including 1) software training, 2) corporate computing and network and 3) a commons facility. John Lackens, representing Cray Research, presented a projected time schedule stating that the initial project will be phased over two years. He further stated that each of the initial buildings are able to expand by 50% with adequate parking expansion planned according to City Code requirements. Mr. Lackens informed the City Council that the total square footage and number of employees at build -out in 1995, is 562,000 square feet and 1,310 employees respectively. He also stated that given their land area and their ability to expand buildings, an ultimate build -out is 1,199,000 square feet with a labor force estimated at 3,440 employees. After questions and comments regarding the revised phasing by the City Council, Mayor Ellison welcomed Cray Research and expressed a strong appreciation on behalf of the City Council for their corporate relocation and expansion plans in the City of Eagan. 1989 PROPOSED BUDGET The City Administrator presented the budget revisions that were discussed at the August 30 special budget workshop session. City Councilmembers reviewed all the budget changes, discussing in detail manpower requests for each department. The City Administrator was directed to pursue a change in designation from park foreman to park maintenance employee with the title of Crew Leader for a new position that is proposed in 1989 in that department. It was also suggested that an amount be budgeted for increased janitorial services, however, the issue of contractual or permanent part-time would not be addressed until after the community center referendum. City Councilmember Gustafson suggested that the communications/projects coordinator position that was eliminated in the last budget session should be given additional consideration. He stated that public relations and the community response to various issues is important to the constituency. He suggested that the City Administrator pursue options for considering a project's coordinator to handle the solid waste abatement by utilizing the services of a semi -retired public relations person or possibly an intern. Councilmember Wachter suggested that some type of reward be given to the Street Department such as an additional allocation for equipment to recognize the manpower savings that was realized by the elimination of a wing operator in each snow plowing operation. City Councilmembers stated that a concept of rewarding employees or employees' suggestions is a good idea and should be further pursued by the City Administrator. City Councilmember McCrea expressed a desire to analyze the potential of user fees for both active and passive park land services. She expressed a concern about the liability and cost of lawsuits and the increased general fund expense for providing certain park services that are not used by all residents of the community. City Councilmember Egan readdressed the equipment certificate proposed at $400,000 for 1989 and asked that the City Administrator caution his management team that there not be a reliance placed on this method of raising capital in future years for the purchase of equipment. There was also a discussion regarding a suitable contingency amount for the proposed budget. After discussion, Mayor Ellison summarized the budget as proposed for 1989 stating that the total budgetary amount is estimated at $10,495,780 for the general fund which includes a contingency of approximately $65,000. The City Administrator was directed to prepare documents for the budget hearing scheduled for October 19, at a regular City Council meeting, based on Council direction at the workshop sessions. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR UPDATE City Administrator Hedges provided an update and timetable for the selection of a Community Development Director. He stated that all applications have been screened by his office and the initial screening of applicants is scheduled for October 4. He further stated that the time schedule for final interviews and selection by the City Council is tentatively set for October 11. BOND CREDIT RATING City Administrator Hedges reported on a recent credit rating trip to New York for meetings with Standard and Poors and Moodys in which City Councilmember Egan, Director of Finance VanOverbeke and the City Administrator attended along with a representative from Springsted. He stated that the City has been notified by Moody's of a rating increase from A to Al, which is excellent news for the City considering the amount of debt proposed for the upcoming issuance. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. September 13, 1988 Dated \/iCki*%'°tkjSkL City Clerk TLH SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 7:00 P.M. * I. ROLL CALL II. CRAY RESEARCH/UPDATE III. PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET 8:00 IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AND REZONING FOR RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION AND A PRELIMINARY PLAT V. CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT * No official action can be taken until 8:00 p.m. to honor the primary election polls that are open until the hour of 8:00 p.m. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 At the September 6, 1988 City Council meeting, action was taken to set a special City Council meeting for Tuesday, September 13, 1988. That action was taken with the understanding that no official action can be taken until after 8:00 p.m. to allow residents an opportunity to vote in their respective precincts until the polls close at that same hour. CRAY RESEARCH/UPDATE The City of Eagan was contacted by representatives of Cray Research who would like an opportunity to present an update on their plans for development with the City Council. Since Cray is requesting a grading permit late next week and due to the long agendas at regular meetings, consent was given to allow Cray a half hour to 40 minutes for an update and any questions and answers the City Council might have at this workshop meeting on Tuesday. Enclosed is a copy of the report and minutes approving the Cray development for your information. PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET At the budget work session held on August 30, 1988, there was specific direction given for various budgetary adjustments. Those adjustments were made and a handout was distributed at the regular City Council meeting on September 6. In case any member of the City Council has misplaced that handout, an additional one has been enclosed for your review. The City Council may wish to interrupt their own discussion about the proposed 1989 budget to consider the various action of Rahncliff 2nd Addition which is scheduled for 8:00 p.m. RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION At the September 6 City Counci-1 meeting this item was continued to allow the City Council to review the development agrement that was prepared and executed for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition development. Presuming the development agreement is in order for consideration, the City Council would then act on the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, planned development agreement, rezoning and preliminary plat for Rahncliff 2nd Addition. OTHER BUSINESS There is no Other Business anticipated at this time. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CRAY ADDITION APPLICANT: CRAY RESEARCH, INC LOCATION: OUTLOTS H, I, J, L, LONE OAK ADDITION, SECTION 1 EXISTING ZONING: PD/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Cray Addition. This replat of Outlots H, I, J, and L of the Lone Oak Addition consists of one 36.2 acre lot for multiple office building use and nine outlots totaling 80.2 acres east of Lone Oak Drive and north of Lone Oak Road. This proposal is consistent with the Planned Development Agreement. BACKGROUND: The 452 acre Lone Oak Addition has four major landowners: Cray Research (116.4 acres) and Northwest Airlines (156.4 acres), with the remaining area split between Wachovia Development and Laukka Development. The Laukka Beck Planned Development had a number of reviews by the City with the racetrack proposal in 1984. An Environmental Impact Statement was completed for the entire 452 acres. An Indirect Source Permit was also obtained for the same area. All requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) have been met to date. The total square footage approved for the entire development is 3,141,000 sq. ft. with an additional 1,000,000 sq. ft. that could be added between the years 2005 and 2020. SITE PLAN: Access to -this site will be from a singular connection to Lone Oak Drive. The single access is requested for security reasons. This road will eventually be constructed along the perimeter of the first phase development, creating a large looping system. Flexibility in the final layout is important so there is compatibility with the building design requirements. Cray is proposing private streets designed to City standards so that they can be dedicated to the City in the future. This will not occur until the entire ring road is completed. The development concept is to create a campus -like setting much like the 212 acre Sperry (Unisys) site that has more than one building on a lot. Platting property in this manner requires greater park dedication and assessment obligations than if individual buildings/lots were created. Cray understands this and is willing to meet all City requirements. The initial development will consist of an approximately 70,000 sq. ft. computer center and one or two 40-60,000 sq. ft. office buildings. The architects and engineers have been selected and building plans are in the design process. The City will require that these plans be reviewed by the Council prior to any building permit issuance. Cray is proposing a staging plan with this proposal so that all affected parties have a basic understanding of the ultimate design. There has been considerable attention given to the existing topography and vegetation in an effort to create a development of the highest quality. GRADING/DR\INAGE: The site is rolling and is separated into 3 drainage bas:_ns. :approximately 1/3 of the site drains north to Pond FP-4.1 and FP-E which for the most part are included in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. while 1/10 of the site will drain east to Pond FP-8. The remaining portion of the site will dra:Ln southwesterly to Pond FP-7 included on the Wacovia property. The outlet for Pond FP-7 is in place and was constructed as part of Lone Oak Addition. The storm sewer outlet for Pond FP-E and FP-4.lare required as part of Stage 1 development and will be directed to Pond FP-7. The outlet elevation for Pond FP-4.1and FP-E shall be constructed in accordance with the City. Pond ease- ment: shall be dedicated to the HWL for Pond FP-E and FP-4.1 included in Cray Addition. The overland flow to Pond FP-4.1 from the wetland in the northwest corner of the site shall be conveyed in pipe. The drainage area directed to Pond FP-3 is included in Stage 2 development. However, Pond FP-8 is not in- cluded in the Cray Addition. Therefore, when Stage 2 development does occur, the storm sewer outlet for Pond FP-8 to FP-4.lshall be required. The required easements for the storm sewer to Pond FP-8 and the storm sewer outlet from Pone FP-8 to Pond FP-4.lshall be the responsibility of this development. The grading of the site is confined only to the roadways as presented on the plan. Therefore, a review of the on-site grading shall be required prior to approval of this development. The grading of the roadways impacts one wet- land which propose filling half the wetland (approx. 0.5 acres). The grades of the roadways appear to be within the percent of grades required by the City of Eagan. STREET/CIRCULATION: Cray Addition is proposed to be served by one street con- nection onto Lone Oak Drive. Due to the significant counts at the one street connection (17,460 ADT) consideration should be given to providing two connec- tions onto Lone Oak Drive dispersing the traffic. This would also eliminate the anticipated congestion projected at the connecting street with the looped street. The impact of this development to Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. 26) should also be considered as to when Lone Oak Road should be considered for upgrading. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate all required utility and ponding easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way within the Cray Addition as a part of final plat approval. Ponding easement dedication shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City's Compre- hensive Storm Sewer Plan and any subsequent revisions necessitated by detailed review of this development proposal. This development shall acquire all related regulatory agency permits in a time frann according Co their requirements. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed over the entire area of this development proposal. However, trunk area storm sewer has only been assessed over the west 60% of this development. Therefore, the additional assessments will be the obligation of this development as follows: ITEM QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT PROJECT # Trunk Area Storm Sewer 1,418,414 sf1 $0.079/sf Trunk Area Water 36.2 ac 3,170/ac 1Area in southeast quarter of Section 1. $112,055 302 114,754 447 Only those trunk area assessments associated with Lot 1, Block 1, are calculated for this proposed development. The obligation of the remaining outlots of this development will be due at the time of their replatting. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve the Cray Addition will be provided from the trunk sewer in Lone Oak Drive. A requirement of Stage 1 development is to connect the trunk sewer in Lone Oak Drive to the sewer in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. through Cray Addition. The sanitary sewer in the northerly part of the looped street shall be constructed to an elevation to properly serve the property along the north side of Pond FP-8 located to the east. Therefore, it is rec- ommended the sewer be lowered approximately 8' from that proposed and be stubbed to the east line of Cray Addition having an invert elevation of ap- proximately 873. Cray Addition shall be responsible for its share of the san- itary sewer extension easterly in Lone Oak Road from Lone Oak Drive to the east line of Cray Addition. Water main serving the Cray Addition will be provided from the 16" trunk main in Lone Oak Drive. To provide proper looping of trunk mains, Stage 1 de- velopment shall be required to connect the 12" trunk main in Cray Addition to :he existing 12" trunk main in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. located at the north line of Cray Addition. Stage 2 development shall be responsible for providing a 10" water stub to serve the property to the east. The 16" trunk main in Lone Oak Road from T.H. No. 55 to Lone Oak Dr.is not required for Stage 1 development due to the looping provided through Lone Oak 2nd Addn.1 However, due to the nature and value of the development in the Cray Addition and in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. it is recommended this 16" main be constructed within the next two years. Cray Addition shall be responsible for its share of the water main ex- tension in Lone Oak Road from Lone Oak Drive to the east line of Cray Addition in accordance with City of Eagan Standards. CONDITIONS: 1. The development agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multiple buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree to review each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council at the time of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be designed in accordance with the public street standards and, also, setbacks from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public street requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each application for building permit. 5. The Preliminary Plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations and comments. 6. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 7. A detailed grading/drainage/erosion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed. 9. This development shall provide for the outlet of Ponds FP -4.1 and FP -E located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development shall provide sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the northeast corner and the east property line of this development. 11. Water main of sufficient size and capacity must be extended and connected to the existing 12" trunk main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 12. This development shall dedicate a 60' half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with a 20' construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all required utility and ponding easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way in accordance with City requirements as a part of final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame according to their respective requirements. 15. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations. 16. This development shall assume its proportionate responsibilities associated with any and all transportation related improvements identified by a detailed traffic impact analysis report. \ 4 0C Gpgip. t7 (..4-N. ?i r 4-441 1. 149 - i 1 Ot%f /7 41 7-1:// ig vo/ •_ / //' m • /0, ; / / / DELAWARE• D D O Z f11--, { ; , I ,{ ,� w oo rw D rw (D CD 0 3 (D p • A N N ▪ • D m W N O rip N A M A O tD N b ; ?';> N NN o T T T• :Aiewwng an ,,'7 )IVO 3NO1 -r 0 4 I m * A -1--i<m.'ioo 1367; gym :46 Oa �'3 Ddd C N 31.n, CO ▪ FFCT)22 SU Nm N ^mT y 00�TV`C r'M QSx-a d N d�0 J�D :NNm • y c_0�o .^`Ca8 10 aNmt"ddA) V N+Oo(A J_ dQ1 da%t 00 n» • 3O 0 nJ D ,n' El J» m _ o do z. x'w p 0_-. O is -6'0E2 CD d 0 _ N N v • y m O O N m A A d n �� JNNO Otn 01 — NNNN 7CD N fY\lI2 -11 O•TN 00 00 '�n 10 Existing vegetation to be preserved 0 9 00 0 m= mo a� A ma . J m6 -0 cd 05 N tetN 3 0 0 c `7N ,' oni a -0 3 1D Q 0 m a 'd0 100 )0 c na° dn'00gj 3aJ 1p� NXm 30_ 03 G a J b S N f..13„ D r d n0(0 ppm N O'O NO (0 ;VImJJ Jmtp dd O�0.0 mo< fa5.o— d J 10 0 N O O d J 2,.- 222' ry V � — d y moan ' a N JCJ mQVdW Jt0 ^dam._ may f FAN n m 0 3 m A J O� d Q O _ C .� E.- m' J m w Bermed and landscaped setbacks for parking lots, typical - IW ID { m i m L . o i N I z 0 m o • -4 o x a Z N S O 1 m z • m m m O f i 1 I i 7 i I NISV9 Ha1VO -4 0 o z x z • O � c x ■ • aasodoad I'I'r'r'''''-------------.-'7--:-: ' 1 1,,',:k. :,,,,',--:.-_-_- ---• -- ,,,„:„.::- _ __ _.. i 0 0 0 .. , -'-'\-.---..--- '''",.......\,..,.... « „ _ '1 ' . - ; \ " -. \ T.,: _—____ - - ___..._,_a‘-..-..._.\.,,_•.7 .,,--- - ‘.,._ - \ s,- !--'''';',.----71:----------- ---_-:_:,—--:_--,.!! - ' .,----- ---------,--- - - , r . - . • ' ",` \ \ - ,r :.—°-":, ' ,. s . i . , ---_ -", •••., ' s -I' A r 1 ; '` j - r ..-- I 1 n_ -'-J---. -«_.,'_. .:..,- —---. ---' --i4, —'''-'- '..'. \ •--.\ .,-,,--:7-"._- _. ,' ,' °-:;:,,. ..,,.S'-•-i-.i#--4.-_-_L,.r-_—,'___7-I ._-, , ..,-_----«:', --';'.----—'-- :,.' ---"_-1---.'-_,_--;'--_------1------'ir-,.j--'''' ,,.-'.'-.'.-.,- --__.-,- „ - ----Z.,-.---'-I'-:--- -'--'''- :':.--),.-...-' .-.„,--.. .,s...-.-. -' • .---,-r .- 7'', /-'1 :'; 1-/,-"-`- \- - ,;-,'-i" --‘ - 7 , -— _- ' - - a- ‘,. . :•*,' ' -; :.5.IT,5::-:_ -: -C.-5 , --, -• ---.-'---- - -. , . —5 -,. -1-Z.:'..-Z- , - 7 „-,-- _, ' 7/: /,. \.4 -1-; - 1 . '-,' ' :--.'-,-' --' i--- -/-,- -''( '-_-'__-' _ -H--'-'‘\,,.,,-\—.,—--/-•-_-l'.'-t\--'--7i4i,-„-.-,l:F,-:.,”:--.-i--„';---,f-.-'--_'1--,. ,-,-', ''i'.,','...I l,',E/ .., --')" -:-/;•',- ---' i' 'Z''' ' * ' ,-- ' / ,,. r - \\\pi ' 1 / 1/r, -.----------.' ----- '.' - - - - - -,, . i.___-4: —. i,,_ ‘? r 1 111 111 X T 2 91 3 " e - 44. ...A. m 33 m u) a3S0d0Eld ---ll--- I 1 _ 23.3/50. CD 61 • • 55.8/800 (12 71.2_.93.0 'AK161ROA Ms Om linis 715/90 -_, 1 16u _ x 26 62.4/850 i50.0/76.0 AuuIT OR 5 07171424 ���4TE j 12u. 3 Hwy � 6"0 --1-p/.$2.0 5/91.0 6T0/89 SEL Ati+K 2 NO. 38 ACRCSI -•ELR OAK PARK ,7;il1' TH S, L CRAY ADDITION ..SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *3 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN WATER MASTER PLAN approved standard plate #: - \ -k ,( T H 404 ,==rr a..art. B. UE GE t.: j.`. h P CJ 40 AUDITORS ! O `i'';t'NQi 1eJ'4D--itiO 31: a ,`� -1 = Y 2..,:,lSt. ,,,888.3 . ..3 h LOP_ '1'v o '1x895. / N;,. -� I > t i 1\ .�_. Ff/ I . r _ i___ -----9 i-- FP -5 ----- a en z ,� /-8 61.0 :��.. °'. .ij-FP- 15 j 838.0 I 668.0 �- »- 643.6; (F- f ✓� � ,� � \p. )LK ROA D L.'CU r 71-777 S. -8 EPrI 829.0 846.8 t. 4.- - • FP- I I \\, 872.0 >� 1880.0 I/ FP -4-- 862.0 -- 862.0 870.0 ,2•j, `_ 1 "••••••,„,, ` t fi FP -8 875.6 8 78 .0 _ _ FP -7 GP -12I y .840.0 860.0: 852.0 88 '5.5 2t, FP -9 887.0 890.0 FP -I3 891.2 MINS GP -II 858.0 836.0 OR 864.4 i 1.. 840.0 :+UJi7 5 t2 • �^'. GP -3 8/6.0804.3 <: 0 36 EP -41\\ GP -2 36.0 k�?: i.1, 11 804.3 �e 939. / � S• L"!,. k 8/6.0 j��t1�_ -i _ 'v0 3E ;;;I-IgH'1112,F;1-1 .11 C R F. IS L.S.--I0- FP - I0- FP- SUBJECT PARCEL CRAY ADDITION FIG. #1 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate #: 0 TOTAL AREA SO? 01,4 50 FT 1114 ACP£5 m o n � 5,3 g F S F cn 0 0) m m 33 c z 1S Vlb'8Lt7'1- dvn Ai1NL IIA 44K l .01 1 11110C -7!`) CD 3 'a000 00 VI 000 Or 0 0 10 OS 150001 0 35 91 10 05 90969 3 Or 61 10 05 645005 0 0 06 15 10 '05 551191 9 30 0 911 10 OS 0510105 6305 16101 104115 0511 WInOS 001 410993539 1600 53d0130 A 0 z Council Minutes June 16, 1987 CRAY WITION RE1?W TTING The application of Cr : Research.:r.:::: Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Cray Addition;:::;: platting.:.Qutlots H, I, J, and L of Lone Oak Addition into one 36.2 aeW1't::: p:s= office use, and nine outlots totaling 80.02 acres was next 't e:atdr:.: The proposal, according to Mr. Runkle, is consistent with the Planned Development Agreement and a request was made by the applicant that there be flexibility in the development to allow permits to be granted as they are requested. The APC requested a review of each building permit application as it is submitted. Ron Samansk:y_iattti:.r: tfrom Doherty, Rumble and Butler, was present, as was` .:-E'c' 'iild.ak?:i;:; Ed Braman, Miles Lindberg and Dale Beckman for Cray Researd Mr :::Samansky suggested that the Planning Commission minutes were inc:q:rrect regarding the vote, indicating the vote was 5 in favand2 against, and noted the Advisory Planning Commishadommended approval. After discussion and review by 'the Courie1,znembers, Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Development Agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multip.e. buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree '' to::::rev.4,w each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council:.at''tie:: dime of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be d :s:i g e n accordance with the public street standards and, also,..;:.si:alcs from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public 4iteet requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each application for building permit. 5. The preliminary 21 :a.1.1..;... be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations::::alcanon ri :s;: 6. All other City Ordinances shalle adhered to. 7. A detailed grading/dral.:t:age/:rflsion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prid ::to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed, although a temporary pipe will be approved. '. 9. This development shall provide fir the outlet of Pond FP -4.1 and FP -E located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development sh 1k?.. trt3Y :c ganitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the. northeast corner and the east property line of this development, in conjuncO:pn with Phase II, or if the owner to the east requests sanitary sewn: : prior to that time. 17 Council Minutes June 16, 1987 11. Water main of suf: :nient size tic3 capacity must be extended and connected to the existing 12 inch trunk main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 12. This development shall:::ticte:3Cat2 a 60 foot half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with a:20:'foot construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development..:.shall .._dedicate all required utility easements located outside:::::::.Q.f:::::::0 d:z at d public right-of-way in accordance with City requirement's::as a part of final plat approval. shall::be responsible for the acquisition permit: ::Yn a.::time frame according to their shall be responsible for all 14. This development of all regulatory agency respective requirements. 15. This development assessment obligations. 16. Vacation of Technology Circle shall be required as a condition upon the plat. Upon question by Councilnari'on, Mr. Samansky stated that the intention of Cray Researg.h is"khat the road be kept private at the present time and there areo fu.t.ue::::.plans regarding the road. additional All voted in favor. BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISED An application was submitted by Sienna Corporation for revised preliminary plat of Bridlecg.e::..:::.: ,Addition consisting of 202 .single family lots on 123 a:::=:::::::::?le indicated that before the previously approved plan isfinal..::platted, the applicant has requested that the City review We neite plan which has certain revisions including below minimum;=:::1ot ::..zes and lot widths and additional cul-de-sacs .. •Fur they , .the ::iii ivate outlot acreage would be 14.9 acres under the new cluster'' plan. The applicant had appeared before the City Council informally and the Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval, subject to certain conditions at its May 26, 1987 meeting. The road right-of-way and the connection to the property to the we.st are issues, according to Mr. Runkle. Mr. Hedges questioned wkc:h::_:::.;fe.::::hpu$ing values would be at the executive housing level and: tc to €Yity could be assured that the developer would comply with the intent of the City Council which granted concessions including reduct.iO:n in minimum subdivision requirements. Rod Hardy, the developer; was present and stated that 18 AP,,C Minutes May 26, 1987 10. The proposed entrance width shall be a minimum of 30 feet with a 20 foot curb return radii. 11. The applicant shall sign a waiver stating that they will not object to or appeal the assessments generated by the construction of the planned east/west street connection as a condition of final plat approval. 12. An erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to grading permit issuance and final plat approval. 13. The development shall be responsible for their additional assessment obligations based on the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. All voted yes. CRAY ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Hall then opened the public hearing in regard to the application of Cray Research, Inc. for a replat of Outlots H, I, J, and L of Lone Oak Addition, consisting of 36.2 acres for a multiple office building use, and 9 outlots totaling 80.2 acres, east of Lone Oak -Drive and north of Lone Oak Road. The proposal was introduced by Mr. Runkle who indicated that the first phase consisting of 36.2 acres of the 116 total acres, including a ring -concept plan for multiple access and the construction of several connected buildings for the Cray campus. Mr. Ron Samansky appeared on behalf of J.A.R. Eagan, a subsidiary of Cray Research, Inc., the ultimate owner of the proposed development. Also present were Mr. Eric Lindahl, Mr. Miles Lindberg and Mr. Ed Braman. Mr. Samansky indicated that the developer was in agreement with the proposed conditions with minor changes to condition 8 in that a temporary pipe would be allowed; condition 9 that an outlot for Pond FP -E would not be required; number 10, that sanitary sewer could be constructed with the Phase II or when the owner of the property to the east requests it; the word "ponding" could be deleted from condition 13; deletion of item 16 regarding transportation related improvements until the second phase; and in addition, the vacation of Technology Circle. Mr. Miles Lindberg of BRW presented a concept plan including the provisions for a buffer to the northwest and the preservation of the wooded knoll to the south. Mr. Samansky indicated that the ISP permit had been granted and the EIS had been approved. There was no one from the public. 13 APC Minutes May 26, 1987 Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed agreements have been reached as previously stated by Mr. Samansky. Member Trygg indicated concern in regard to the amount of traffic from the one access point to which Mr. Colbert replied that the developer had been advised that a future second access may be required creating a need for a second security post. There was discussion in regard to the seven private accesses to the private looped street and the number of parking stalls proposed. Mr. Lindberg indicated that Cray Research averaged one employee per 250 square feet of work area, on which it has based its parking requirements. Discussion centered around the ability to provide a preliminary plat for one large lot with several potential building sites. After substantial discussion in regard to the propriety of granting a preliminary plat where only concepts for the buildings were in hand, Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Development Agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multiple buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree to review each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council at the time of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be designed in accordance with the public street standards and, also, setbacks from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public street requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each a;oplication for building permit. 5. The preliminary plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations and comments. 6. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 7. A detailed grading/drainage/erosion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed, although a temporary pipe will be approved. 9. This development shall provide for the outlet of Pond FP -4.1 located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development shall provide sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the northeast corner and the east property line of this development, in conjunction with Phase II, or if the owner to the east requests sanitary sewer prior to that time. 14 APC Minutes May 26, 1987 11. Water main of sufficient size and capacity must be extended and connected to the existing 12 inch trunk main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 12. This development shall dedicate a 60 foot half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with a 20 foot construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all required utility easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way in accordance with City requirements as a part of final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame according to their respective requirements. 15. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations. 16. Vacation of Technology Circle shall be required as a condition upon the plat. All voted in favor. RESIDENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Chairman Hall then convened the last public hearing of the evening in regard to the proposed subdivision Ordinance amendment regarding residential street widths. Mr. Runkle indicated that this issue had been continued from the previous hearing in order to allow re -noticing of the public and to specifically notify the Developer's Task Force members. Mr. Mark Parranto was present and indicated that the Developer's Task Force had included two provisions which were not part of the proposed amendment. The first provision provided for variable lengths of cul-de-sacs where the ADT did not exceed 150, meaning that not more than 15 dwelling units would access the cul-de-sac. In addition, there was a provision for local access streets with 300 to 1,000 ADTs to have a reduced width, pursuant to staff approval. Mr. Parranto requested that the Planning Commission consider approving the proposed amendment in its original form from the Developer's Task Force. Mr. Rod Hardy was also present and indicated that other Development Task Force members had been polled and disapproved of the revised proposed amendment. He suggested a consensus of the Task Force, including staff members, a member of the APC and a City Council member, including the provisions described by Mr. Parranto. 15 Page 1 COMPARISON 1988 TO 1989 General Fund Budgets 1988 Budget As Approved Less Contingency Net 1989 Budget As Revised Less Contingency Net Increase 1988 - 1989 Amount Percentage June 20, 1988 Estimate Revenues Total BUDGETS AS REVISED General Fund $8,652,100 (16,280) $8,635,820 $10,760,250 (330, 630) $10,429,620 $1,793,800 20.80 $10,495,780 Equipment Certificates $11,557,250 $10,760,250 $400,000 Expenditures 11,557,250 10,769,250 400,000 S.Waste Abatement $147,000 147,000 StormWater Utility $250,000 250,000 Page 2 ADJUSTMENTS TO BUDGET BY CITY COUNCIL August 30, 1988 Less: Net Adjustments Capital To: Equipment Certificates Solid Waste Abatement Storm Water Utility Revised Total (Reduction to $330,630 Contingency from $339,310) August 30, 1988 Less: Equipment Certificates Solid Waste Abatement Grant Storm Water Utility Expenditures $11,557,250 (141,320) (400,000) (147,000) (100,000) $10,768,930 (8,680) $10,760,250 Revenues $11,557,250 (400,000) (147,000) (250,000) Revised Total $10,760,250 Page 3 ADJUSTMENTS TO BUDGET 8-30-88 For 9-6-88 Administration - 1) Communications Coordinator - 2) East Metro Membership Community Development ($29,890) ($2,000) - 2 - 1/2 Time Janitors ($18,790) + Contractual Janitorial $18,000 - Telephone System Consultant ($30,000) Public Works/Engineering - Engineering Aide ($21,250) (Actually Eliminates the $ amount for the clerk/typist which was previously traded for the 2nd Engineering Aide) + Additional Intern $15,000 Streets - 1 Maintenance Worker ($27,930) Parks & Recreation/Forestry - Forester - Landscape Architect + Consulting Architectural Service ($32,750) ($36,710) $25,000 ($199,320) + $58,000 = ($141,320) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RARNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made this 6th day of September, 1988, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City") and AUSTIN COMPANIES, a Minnesota General Partnership, and M.G. ASTLEFORD, an individual (hereinafter the "Applicants") . RECITALS The Applicants have made application for re -zoning of certain properties located at Rahn and Cliff Roads in the City of Eagan and legally described as set forth on Exhibit "A" from 16.8 acres of Limited Business and Roadside Business to a Commercial Planned Development District and have submitted a preliminary development plan, (Exhibit "B" attached). This agreement setting forth the conditions of development governing the property is part of the final development plan. It is the intention of the Applicants to construct this project consistent with the standards contained in this agreement. The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the zoning standards and conditions which will govern the development of the property to be constructed by the Applicants. It is intended to cover matters relating to compliance with the City's Planned Development Ordinance and not to address other issues of property subdivision, public improvements, assessments, or other matters that may be part of the process of development of the subject property, unless specifically set forth. This agreement and the final development plan contemplate the use of the subject property as set forth on Exhibit "C" and it is understood that any change in the use of the subject property as set forth in Exhibit "C" would render this agreement and the planned development void. Any proposed change in use of the subject property from the uses as set forth in Exhibit "C" will necessitate a change of plan or zoning or both. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants stated herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. _•,_ . ,- 4!' -1 . The Applicants agree that they will develop the above described property in conformance with the Eagan City Code, with the development plan, and with the conditions attached thereto as listed in Exhibit "D" which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. obligations of the City. The City hereby approves the development plan subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "D" and further agrees to cooperate in the approval of any site plan and final plats as may be necessary to implement the approved development plan. The City reserves the right to object to any particular element of such plans or plats which it determines is contrary to the law, or the health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of the City. 3. Events oLDefault and Remedies. The term "events of default by the Applicants" shall mean, whenever it is used in this agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: -2- (a) Failure by either or both of the Applicants to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on their part within thirty (30) days after written notice to the Applicants specifying the failure and requesting that it be remedied (or within such other period as the parties may agree in writing). (b) Failure by either or both of the Applicants to commence construction pursuant to the development plan within five (5) years of the date of this agreement. In that event, the event of default shall apply only to those improvements or structures on which construction has not commenced. The term "default" shall mean any event which would with the passage of time or giving of notice, or both, be an "event of default" under this agreement. Whenever any event of default referred to in this section occurs, the City may take one or more of the following actions: (a) Initiate re -zoning of the subject property to the original zoning classification in effect at the time of the P.D. re -zoning application or to a zoning classification consistent with the land use designation for the property shown in the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sagan. (b) Declare null and void any building and site plans or development plans approved pursuant to the planned development ordinance. (c) Refuse building or other permits. (d) Stop work on Applicants' project through the issuance of stop work orders. -3 (e) Take whatever action at law or in equity as may appear necessary or desirable to the City to enforce performance and observation of any obligations, agreements or covenants of the Applicants under this agreement. The City's remedies for default by an Applicant shall be taken only against the particular Applicant determined to be in default under this agreement. Where the event of default is on a joint obligation of the Applicants, the City may exercise its remedies hereunder against either or both of the individual Applicants. The term "event of default by the City" shall mean, whenever it is used in this agreement, (unless the context otherwise provides) a failure by the City to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part within thirty (30) days after written notice to the City specifying the failure and requesting that it be remedied (or within such other period as the parties may agree in writing) . The term "default" shall mean any event which would with the passage of time or giving of notice, or both, be in event of default under this agreement. Whenever any event _of default by the City occurs, the Applicants may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the Applicants to enforce performance and observance of any obligations, agreement or covenant of the City under this agreement. 4. jisiiimffl:___ot_Sjaima. The Applicants expressly waive any claims against the City of Eagan or its employees or agents for actions taken in good faith in the exercise of the remedies for default specified above. 5.Notices and Demands. A notice, demand or other communication under this agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed to the party and its attorney at the addresses listed below. Either party may designate another address or attorney for receipt of notice under this section by designating in writing, and forwarding such writing, to the other party as provided in this section. In the case of the City, notices shall be mailed to City of Eagan, Attention: City Administrator, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21199, Eagan, MN 55121. In the case of the Applicants, notices shall be mailed to: Austi n Companies ATTN: M. Austin Smith Ivy Tower 115 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 Gary Gandrud Faegre & Benson 8400 Normandale Blvd Bloomington, MN 55436 M. G. As tl of o r d 1200 West Highway 13 Burnsville, MN 55337 6. ,gym, ntmet. This agreement may be amended in writing from time to time as the parties shall mutually agree. Furthermore, the plans, standards, stipulations, and other information constituting the development plan and conditions attached as Exhibit "D" may be -5- amended upon application by the Applicants and approval of the City pursuant to Eagan City Code. Amendments to the development plan and conditions, once approved, shall become part of this agreement, fully binding upon the parties, as if fully set forth herein. 7. Exhibits. The exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein and made reference and made a part of this agreement. The exhibits are: Exhibit A Legal Description Exhibit B Development Plan including sketch plan, major street plan, and preliminary plat Exhibit C Uses Exhibit D Conditions 8. $_ucce.s.sors and Assigns. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 9. Recording. This agreement shall run with the subject land and may be recorded in the office of the Dakota County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF EAGAN a Minnesota municipal corporation By: VICTOR L. ELLISON Its: Mayor By: -6- E. J. VanOVERBEKE Its: Clerk AUSTIN COMPANIES a Minnesota By: Its: By: Its: M. G. ASTLEFORD STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of ., 1988, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared VICTOR L. ELLISON and E. J. VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) Ss. COUNTY OF On this day of , 1988, before me a Notary Publicwi hin and for said County, personally appeared -7_ and to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn to be partners of the Partnership named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the seal of said partnership and that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said Partnership by said and and they acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the Partnership. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF On this day of , 1988, before me a Notary public within and for said County, personally appeared M. G. ASTLEFORD to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the :foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: McMENOMY & SEVERSON, P.A. 7300 West 147th Street P.O. Box 24329 Apple Valley, MN 55124 (612) 432-3136 JFS EXHIBIT C TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RABNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION Rahnclitf Lot One (1), Block One (1) , (1.1 acres) 7,000 square feet (bank) Lot Two (2) , Block One (1) , (1.1 acres) 14,000 square feet retail Outlot A, (2,7 acres) 20,000 square feet retail (possibly two buildings) Lot One (1) , Block Two (2) , (3.8 acres) 50,000 square feet multi-level (one to three stories) office with 60 underground parking spaces. Outlot B, (1.8 acres) 12,000 square foot office and/or medical clinic Outlot C, (0.8 acres) 5,000 square foot restaurant Lot One (1), Block Three (3), (1.0 acres) 3,500 square foot restaurant Lot Two (2) , Block Three (3) , (1.3 acres) 10,000 square foot retail Lot Three (3) , Block Three MI (3.2 acres) 20,400 square foot retail EXRIBIT D TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION Conditions for the Planned Development Agreement for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition: 1. Those conditions attached as pages A, B and C and incorporated herein. 2. Landscaping to be in accordance with the landscape plan approved by the City Planner. 3. The buildings will be constructed on all sides with light and Clark brick, accented with rock -faced block or stucco and metal canopies for Lot Two (2), Block One (1); Lot Three (3), Block Three (3) and Lot Two (2), Block Three (3). 4. Lighting and landscaping on the adjacent gas station property shall be installed at the time the improvements are made on this property. 5. A signal light must be installed at the Rahn Road and Cliff intersection prior to occupancy of any building. 6. Directional traffic signage for Rahn Road may be installed by the City south of the loop street. RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Pl, and Gl . 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a period of five years. 3. Lot 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lot 3, Block 3; Lot 1, Biock 1; Lot 2, Block 3; and Lot 1, Biock 3 shall be approved at this time. All outlots will be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council. 4. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the site plan shall be approved. A 27' -maximum height shall be adhered to. 5. All trash shall be contained within the buildings except for the fast-food facility on lot 1, block 3. 6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the adjacent roads or Highway 35E. 7. The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988. 8. The Development is required to revise the proposed watermain design. The proposed design interconnects 2 different pressure zones. 9. The Development is required to limit phosphorus loadings to Cliff Lake to pre -development levels. 10. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm sewer along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed. 11. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer line along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed. 12. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm water runoff which it can discharge directly into the existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the northeasterly corner of the Development and flows into Pond AP -42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed through Pond AP -44 prior to discharge into the existing City storm sewer system. 13. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which discharges into the existing 1$" storm sewer along the westerlyside of I -35E. The runoff Brom this area 1s required to drain intPond AP -44. 14. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond AP -44 will be allowed. 15. Al]. entrances into parking areas from public street right-of-way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to be 30 feet wide minimum. 16. The Development is responsible for its proportionate share of any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the intensity of the proposed development as identified by the City and County. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessment, 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. P] am cin&. Spe_cifi__cations 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 7:00 P.M. * I. ROLL CALL II. CRAY RESEARCH/UPDATE III. PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET 8:00 IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AND REZONING FOR RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION AND A PRELIMINARY PLAT V. CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT * No official action can be taken until 8:00 p.m. to honor the primary election polls that are open until the hour of 8:00 p.m. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 At the September 6, 1988 City Council meeting, action was taken to set a special City Council meeting for Tuesday, September 13, 1988. That action was taken with the understanding that no official action can be taken until after 8:00 p.m. to allow residents an opportunity to vote in their respective precincts until the polls close at that same hour. CRAY RESEARCH/UPDATE The City of Eagan was contacted by representatives of Cray Research who would like an opportunity to present an update on their plans for development with the City Council. Since Cray is requesting a grading permit late next week and due to the long agendas at regular meetings, consent was given to allow Cray a half hour to 40 minutes for an update and any questions and answers the City Council might have at this workshop meeting on Tuesday. Enclosed is a copy of the report and minutes approving the Cray development for your information. PROPOSED 1989 BUDGET At the budget work session held on August 30, 1988, there was specific direction given for various budgetary adjustments. Those adjustments were made and a handout was distributed at the regular City Council meeting on September 6. In case any member of the City Council has misplaced that handout, an additional one has been enclosed for your review. The City Council may wish to interrupt their own discussion about the proposed 1989 budget to consider the various action of Rahncliff 2nd Addition which is scheduled for 8:00 p.m. RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION At the September 6 City Council meeting this item was continued to allow the City Council to review the development agrement that was prepared and executed for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition development. Presuming the development agreement is in order for consideration, the City Council would then act on the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, planned development agreement, rezoning and preliminary plat for Rahncliff 2nd Addition. OTHER BUSINESS There is no Other Business anticipated at this time. /S/ Thomas L, Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CRAY ADDITION APPLICANT: CRAY RESEARCH, INC LOCATION: OUTLOTS H, I, J, L, LONE OAK ADDITION, SECTION 1 EXISTING ZONING: PD/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Cray Addition. This replat of Outlots H, I, J, and L of the Lone Oak Addition consists of one 36.2 acre lot for multiple office building use and nine outlots totaling 80.2 acres east of Lone Oak Drive and north of Lone Oak Road. This proposal is consistent with the Planned Development Agreement. BACKGROUND: The 452 acre Lone Oak Addition has four major landowners: Cray Research (116.4 acres) and Northwest Airlines (156.4 acres), with the remaining area split between Wachovia Development and Laukka Development. The Laukka Beck Planned Development had a number of reviews by the City with the racetrack proposal in 1984. An Environmental Impact Statement was completed for the entire 452 acres. An Indirect Source Permit was also obtained for the same area. All requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) have been met to date. The total square footage approved for the entire development is 3,141,000 sq. ft. with an additional 1,000,000 sq. ft. that could be added between the years 2005 and 2020. SITE PLAN: Access to this site will be from a singular connection to Lone Oak Drive. The single access is requested for security reasons. This road will eventually be constructed along the perimeter of the first phase development, creating a large looping system. Flexibility in the final layout is important so there is compatibility with the building design requirements. Cray is proposing private streets designed to City standards so that they can be dedicated to the City in the future. This will not occur until the entire ring road is completed. The development concept is to create a campus -like setting much like the 212 acre Sperry (Unisys) site that has more than one building on a lot. Platting property in this manner requires greater park dedication and assessment obligations than if individual buildings/lots were created. Cray understands this and is willing to meet all City requirements. The initial development will consist of an approximately 70,000 sq. ft. computer center and one or two 40-60,000 sq. ft. office buildings. The architects and engineers have been selected and building plans are in the design process. The City will require that these plans be reviewed by the Council prior to any building permit issuance. Cray is proposing a staging plan with this proposal so that all affected parties have a basic understanding of the ultimate design. There has been considerable attention given to the existing topography and vegetation in an effort to create a development of the highest quality. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The site is rolling and is separated into 3 drainage basins. Approximately 1/3 of the site drains north to Pond FP -4.1 and FP -E which for the most part are included in Lone Oak 2nd .Addn. while 1/10 of the site will drain east to Pond FP -8. The remaining portion of the site will drain southwesterly to Pond FP -7 included on the Wacovia property. The outlet for Pond FP -7 is in place and was constructed as part of Lone Oak Addition. The storm sewer outlet for Pond FP -E and FP-4.1are required as part of Stage 1 development and will be directed to Pond FP -7. The outlet elevation for Pond FP -;.land FP -E shall be constructed in accordance with the City. Pond ease- ment shall be dedicated to the HWL for Pond FP -E and FP -4.1 included in Cray Addition. The overland flow to Pond FP -4.1 from the wetland in the northwest corner of the site shall be conveyed in pipe. The drainage area directed to Pond FP -3 is included in Stage 2 development. However, Pond FP -8 is not in- cluded in the Cray Addition. Therefore, when Stage 2 development does occur, the storm sewer outlet for Pond FP -8 to FP-4.lshall be required. The required easements for the storm sewer to Pond FP -8 and the storm sewer outlet from Pond FP -8 to Pond FP-4.lshall be the responsibility of this development. The grading of the site is confined only to the roadways as presented on the plan. Therefore, a review of the on-site grading shall be required prior to approval of this development. The grading of the roadways impacts one wet- land which propose filling half the wetland (approx. 0.5 acres). The grades of the roadways appear to be within the percent of grades required by the City of Eagan. STREET/CIRCULATION: Cray Addition is proposed to be served by one street con- nection onto Lone Oak Drive. Due to the significant counts at the one street connection (17,460 ADT) consideration should be given to providing two connec- tions onto Lone Oak Drive dispersing the traffic. This would also eliminate the anticipated congestion projected at the connecting street with the looped street. The impact of this development to Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. 26) should also be considered as to when Lone Oak Road should be considered for upgrading. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate all required utility and ponding easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way within the Cray Addition as a part of final plat approval. Ponding easement dedication shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City's Compre- hensive Storm Sewer Plan and any subsequent revisions necessitated by detailed review of this development proposal. This development shall acquire all related regulatory agency permits in a time fraise according to their requirements. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed over the entire area of this development proposal. However, trunk area storm sewer has only been assessed over the west 60% of this development. Therefore, the additional assessments will be the obligation of this development as follows: ITEM QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT PROJECT # Trunk Area Storm Sewer 1,418,414 sf1 $0.079/sf Trunk Area Water 36.2 ac 3,170/ac 1Area in southeast quarter of Section 1. $112,055 302 114,754 447 Only those trunk area assessments associated with Lot 1, Block 1, are calculated for this proposed development. The obligation of the remaining outlots of this development will be due at the time of their replatting. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve the Cray Addition will be provided from the trunk sewer in Lone Oak Drive. A requirement of Stage 1 development is to connect the trunk sewer in Lone Oak Drive to the sewer in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. through Cray Addition. The sanitary sewer in the northerly part of the looped street shall be constructed to an elevation to properly serve the property along the north side of Pond FP-8 located to the east. Therefore, it is rec- ommended the sewer be lowered approximately 8' from that proposed and be stubbed to the east line of Cray Addition having an invert elevation of ap- proximately 873. Cray Addition shall be responsible for its share of the san- itary sewer extension easterly in Lone Oak Road from Lone Oak Drive to the east line of Cray Addition. Water main serving the Cray Addition will be provided from the 16" trunk main in Lone Oak Drive. To provide proper looping of trunk mains, Stage 1 de- velopment shall be required to connect the 12" trunk main in Cray Addition to the existing 12" trunk main in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. located at the north line of Cray Addition. Stage 2 development shall be responsible for providing a 10" water stub to serve the property to the east. The 16" trunk main in Lone Oak Road from T.H. No. 55 to Lone Oak Dr.is not required for Stage 1 development due to the looping provided through Lone Oak 2nd Addn.1 However, due to the nature and value of the development in the Cray Addition and in Lone Oak 2nd Addn. it is recommended this 16" main be constructed within the next two years. Cray Addition shall be responsible for its share of the water main ex- tension in Lone Oak Road from Lone Oak Drive to the east line of Cray Addition in accordance with City of Eagan Standards. CONDITIONS: 1. The development agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multiple buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree to review each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council at the time of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be designed in accordance with the public street standards and, also, setbacks from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public street requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each application for building permit. 5. The Preliminary Plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations and comments. 6. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 7. A detailed grading/drainage/erosion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed. 9. This development shall provide for the outlet of Ponds FP -4.1 and FP -E located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development shall provide sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the northeast corner and the east property line of this development. 11. Water main of sufficient size and capacity must be extended and connected to the existing 12" trunk main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 12. This development shall dedicate a 60' half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with a 20' construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all required utility and ponding easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way in accordance with City requirements as a part of final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame according to their respective requirements. 15. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations. 16. This development shall assume its proportionate responsibilities associated with any and all transportation related improvements identified by a detailed traffic impact analysis report. r z m i ..\ Ak_____—_ .--;'*--T-t--- , I i_____ \ 1 II 1, i ---- r-i-t.:1=--k-_, . I IP1--- - 9 i: I It".' -1114)//1': ------i-L-1- ,------=7---,- , 111"11,-:(11111:,11'if:111' II rt,_4_'------: 1 I I v--,- I 1 11 \-- Z3,-t:11.1 II 1 II I -firl11-11-111-111 - 1j111111 i iva-_-_-.--- 10 /‘: ,.---- 11/1 '--- (---- ///,- 1------ -- / / . ) - ••••,ita=nizt ! -------------- DELAWARE Z _�ss�> ✓�•� sz . �--� . }� co 3 } •f{\ \,�»\\ 'Amm, n D { a wvWWVWNIA m m 2 D Z n n D { * 1 i T rAT pO O y 3 D0 0 C C W N d _� • Era ao�77mm 3 Door. Cn d d W W+ IVIV W .G O m 1"F >;cNT D- m,zo» ''''.0:1194CN 9I S aNNm r� ODmOtO Wil mmcc ▪ 5-We3 ry • r:aE, `(D �c N a,� m mn0 a a '30o • »W. 0ee D 'c'T Fi O W a OW. xO � T. O » a /D _ N •a• NN AN JOONAw OmW 0a m 0" T vvav N> cO 3 mmmm T• 3"' ^+ 0000 in wwa0 in Wing vegetation to be preserved 0 F 7. o m Y L rj IMRE •s 16" 155.8/80.0 �_..........._. 71.219 .0 I2 IAKI,'ROA Ionsiormal is r>E#�2 -1- '5/91.0 67.0 71.5/9V i I ' 16" Air k 26 62.4/85.0 50.0/76.0 AUUITOR'S 82.©1.,\ .5147 W Y____ t f/-82.0 55 -:(01-820 N0. ?8 'RI" 1344 VIg‘liACRCS'� • ' "s r.. • V- 1 !Yi1:TH -X4:3,/6 0 CRAY ADDITION SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *3 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER MASTER PLAN approved standard plate #: — n D { tiB 0 0 OV 91 '1i DS 96969 OV 9n 'li DS 9[69C9 3 gOgg OV 6 [ 14 'OS 692160 0 OV 66 1i DS 0690Ct O OV [C 'IA DS 611191 9 OV 9't LI DS OLl669 V TOTAL AREA 5010194 SO. FT 116.1 ACRES g F 0 i I 1 I ) \N, • T17-4 494 f B. LIE GEN7J.:".N,, • ) -• • AUDIT OR:,S ! 31 ! Ff -9 t/ --F111,8 8 6.3 -N o / • j a _ IMRE FP -5 8 6 1.0 868.0 ammimm. --4,21.1.11111411miam•1 cck 8620 !.3 870.0 ---FP,r5 0 , cn. zi-sr)p, 838.0 /4" s---843.6 5; F e„ • ty koe. \f -e • \ % • ) t, K ROA D gi\L ,„,,\,-. _ .8 4 0.0 852.0 FP -8 875.6 878.0 - Om= G 0-71i2 1/ 8 0.0 ' 8$5.5 . salaam. am..1°.l.m. 1 s 26 12 ..Z>. GP -ll lZP 10—'- 858.0 8 36.0 AUDIT OR .5 (zi.864.4 840.0 12* 174 i‘ EPrl 829.0 846.8 171 ' - - A ! - E -o 42 FP- ggzi 38 SELMA NO - Nyz.wir377 • ACRES • 1 - FP -9 887.0 890.0 .11,1454,6 14\s, FP -I3 891.2 GP -3 804.3 8/6.0 /, - P7-1 RPn't), 3° SUBJECT PARCEL CRAY ADDITION f FIG. #1 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate #: dVW AlINIJIA a 33NS l dO & 133HS ••=, m m D I 2 n r :0 171) CLLS% 1 x0018 1101 N 2 2 2 9 2 2 2 2 2 "O i f i O O o O O O o O of. m x Y L 9 E., O a m n m> 1.---, n 1 P o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g R A _ i A s = x r. -1 0 Z Council Minutes June 16, 1987 CRAY %»:D'ITION REni 1TT ING The application of cqy CrResearch:;;:::: Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Cray Addition::::::plattingtlots H, I, J, and L of Lone Oak Addition into one 36.2 a'ft:.::::Ii o `office use, and nine outlots totaling 80.02 acres was next'te:ati:-::'"The proposal, according to Mr. Runkle, is consistent with the Planned Development Agreement and a request was made by the applicant that there be flexibility in the development to allow permits to be granted as they are requested. The APC requested a review of each building permit application as it is submitted. Ron SamansU:ttsx:i7yWfrom Doherty, Rumble and Butler, was present, as was :E'r' ? Liirid'ab:;:; Ed Braman, Miles Lindberg and Dale Beckman for Cray Researd Mr::Samansky suggested that the Planning Commission minutes were inc:p:rrect regarding the vote, indicating the vote was 5 in favo;rand:::2 against, and noted the Advisory Planning Commissy:#ad::::::Oiommended approval. After discussion and review by .:eh CoditIlmembers, Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve. the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Development Agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multip:;e.. buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree '''': te4:ev.,gw each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council:.at''thie:: time of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be 45.49:0ii. accordance with the public street standards and, also,.e:00h ks from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each application for building permit. 5. The preliminary ;:;:yea a:t::;:::;:;:ha:l:l:.;.;. be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations;:;.gW00i 040:. 6. All other City Ordinancesall:# a adhered to. • 7. A detailed grading/dra :gage/0:sion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prig:::to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed, although a temporary pipe will be approved. 9. This development shall provide the outlet of Pond FP -4.1 and FP -E located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development s 4?,:pkcsa c 'sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the. northeast corner and the east property line of this development, in conjunc:a:pn with Phase II, or if the owner to the east requests sanitary sewer: :prior to that time. 17 Council Minutes June 16, 1987 11. Water main of sufWient size Wi capacity must be extended and connected to the existiii 12 inch tb.ffik main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition, 12. This development shall :4004 a 60 foot half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with '.:Plobt construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this developmenthhallicate all required utility easements located outsidefa00A000 public right-of-way in accordance with City requiedffeifetth-6.0tt of final plat approval. 14. This development shalle responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in frame according to their respective requirements. 15. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations. 16. Vacation of Technology Circle shall be required as a condition upon the plat. Upon question by EIison, Mr. Samansky stated that the intention of Cray Researqp ith'il.i4the road be kept private at the present time and there areno fpCplans regarding the road. All voted in favor. BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISED An application was submitted by Sienna Corporation for revised preliminary plat of consisting consisting of 202 single family lots on 123$.t:04Wii0Wil4:6iikle indicated that before the previously approved plan is:::::::finak.x,platted, the applicant has requested that the City review te nelfite plan which has certain revisions including below minimumnlot Wi.zes, and lot widths and additional cul-de-sacs. Turtherthe *ivate outlot acreage would be 14.9 acres under the new cluster: plan. The applicant had appeared before the City Council informally and the Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval, subject to certain conditions at its May 26, 1987 meeting. The road right-of-way and the connection to the property to the wp..tht are issues, according to Mr. Runkle. :::::::•:• • Mr. Hedges questioned wgliWM'itiOi.i$ing values would be at the executive housing level andAii*67 could be assured that the developer would comply with the intent of the City Council which granted concessions including reductWA in minimum subdivision requirements. Rod Hardy, the developerias present and stated that 18 APC Minutes May 26, 1987 10. The proposed entrance width shall be a minimum of 30 feet with a 20 foot curb return radii. 11. The applicant shall sign a waiver stating that they will not object to or appeal the assessments generated by the construction of the planned east/west street connection as a condition of final plat approval. 12. An erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to grading permit issuance and final plat approval. 13. The development shall be responsible for their additional assessment obligations based on the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. All voted yes. CRAY ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Hall then opened the public hearing in regard to the application of Cray Research, Inc. for a replat of Outlots H, I, J, and L of Lone Oak Addition, consisting of 36.2 acres for a multiple office building use, and 9 outlots totaling 80.2 acres, east of Lone Oak- Drive and north of Lone Oak Road. The proposal was introduced by Mr. Runkle who indicated that the first phase consisting of 36.2 acres of the 116 total acres, including a ring -concept plan for multiple access and the construction of several connected buildings for the Cray campus. Mr. Ron Samansky appeared on behalf of J.A.R. Eagan, a subsidiary of Cray Research, Inc., the ultimate owner of the proposed development. Also present were Mr. Eric Lindahl, Mr. Miles Lindberg and Mr. Ed Braman. Mr. Samansky indicated that the developer was in agreement with the proposed conditions with minor changes to condition 8 in that a temporary pipe would be allowed; condition 9 that an outlot for Pond FP -E would not be required; number 10, that sanitary sewer could be constructed with the Phase II or when the owner of the property to the east requests it; the word "ponding" could be deleted from condition 13; deletion of item 16 regarding transportation related improvements until the second phase; and in addition, the vacation of Technology Circle. Mr. Miles Lindberg of BRW presented a concept plan including the provisions for a buffer to the northwest and the preservation of the wooded knoll to the south. Mr. Samansky indicated that the ISP permit had been granted and the EIS had been approved. There was no one from the public. 13 APC Minutes May 26, 1987 Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed agreements have been reached as previously stated by Mr. Samansky. Member Trygg indicated concern in regard to the amount of traffic from the one access point to which Mr. Colbert replied that the developer had been advised that a future second access may be required creating a need for a second security post. There was discussion in regard to the seven private accesses to the private looped street and the number of parking stalls proposed. Mr. Lindberg indicated that Cray Research averaged one employee per 250 square feet of work area, on which it has based its parking requirements. Discussion centered around the ability to provide a preliminary plat for one large lot with several potential building sites. After substantial discussion in regard to the propriety of granting a preliminary plat where only concepts for the buildings were in hand, Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Development Agreement shall be entered into and approved by the City allowing multiple buildings on a single lot. 2. The applicants agree to review each site plan for specific buildings with the City Council at the time of building permit. 3. Outlot A shall be designed in accordance with the public street standards and, also, setbacks from Outlot A shall be required in accordance with public street requirements. 4. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted with each application for building permit. 5. The preliminary plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's recommendations and comments. 6. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 7. A detailed grading/drainage/erosion and sediment control plan must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 8. No overland drainage of storm sewer systems will be allowed, although a temporary pipe will be approved. 9. This development shall provide for the outlet of Pond FP -4.1 located in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 10. This development shall provide sanitary sewer of sufficient size and elevation to the northeast corner and the east property line of this development, in conjunction with Phase II, or if the owner to the east requests sanitary sewer prior to that time. 14 ki?C Minutes May 26, 1987 11. Water main of sufficient size and capacity must be extended and connected to the existing 12 inch trunk main in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. 12. This development shall dedicate a 60 foot half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road along with a 20 foot construction/slope easement to accommodate the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. 13. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all required utility easements located outside of dedicated public right-of-way in accordance with City requirements as a part of final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame according to their respective requirements. 15. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations. 16. Vacation of Technology Circle shall be required as a condition upon the plat. All voted in favor. RESIDENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Chairman Hall then convened the last public hearing of the evening in regard to the proposed subdivision Ordinance amendment regarding residential street widths. Mr. Runkle indicated that this issue had been continued from the previous hearing in order to allow re -noticing of the public and to specifically notify the Developer's Task Force members. Mr. Mark Parranto was present and indicated that the Developer's Task Force had included two provisions which were not part of the proposed amendment. The first provision provided for variable lengths of cul-de-sacs where the ADT did not exceed 150, meaning that not more than 15 dwelling units would access the cul-de-sac. In addition, there was a provision for local access streets with 300 to 1,000 ADTs to have a reduced width, pursuant to staff approval. Mr. Parranto requested that the Planning Commission consider approving the proposed amendment in its original form from the Developer's Task Force. Mr. Rod Hardy was also present and indicated that other Development Task Force members had been polled and disapproved of the revised proposed amendment. He suggested a consensus of the Task Force, including staff members, a member of the APC and a City Council member, including the provisions described by Mr. Parranto. 15 Page 1 COMPARISON 1988 TO 1989 General Fund Budgets 1988 Budget As Approved Less Contingency Net 1989 Budget As Revised Less Contingency Net Increase 1988 - 1989 Amount Percentage June 20, 1988 Estimate Revenues Total BUDGETS AS REVISED General Fund $11,557,250 $10,760,250 Expenditures 11,557,250 10,769,250 $8,652,100 (16,280) $8,635,820 $10,760,250 (330,630) $10,429,620 $1,793,800 20.8% $10,495,780 Equipment S.Waste Certificates Abatement $400,000 $147,000 400,000 147,000 StormWater Utility $250,000 250,000 Page 2 ADJUSTMENTS TO BUDGET BY CITY COUNCIL August 30, 1988 Less: Net Adjustments Capital To: Equipment Certificates Solid Waste Abatement Storm Water Utility Revised Total (Reduction to $330,630 Contingency from $339,310) August 30, 1988 Less: Equipment Certificates Solid Waste Abatement Grant Storm Water Utility Expenditures $11,557,250 (141,320) (400,000) (147,000) (100,000) $10,768,930 (8,680) $10,760,250 Revenues $11,557,250 (400,000) (147,000) (250,000) Revised Total $10,760,250 Page 3 ADJUSTMENTS TO BUDGET 8-30-88 For 9-6-88 Administration - 1) Communications Coordinator - 2) East Metro Membership Community Development 2 - ? Time Janitors + Contractual Janitorial Telephone System Consultant Public Works/Engineering ($29,890) ($2,000) ($18,790) $18,000 ($30,000) Engineering Aide ($21,250) (Actually Eliminates the $ amount for the clerk/typist which was previously traded for the 2nd Engineering Aide) + Additional Intern $15,000 Streets - 1 Maintenance Worker ($27,930) Parks & Recreation/Forestry - Forester Landscape Architect + Consulting Architectural Service ($32,750) ($36,710) $25,000 ($199,320) + $58,000 = ($141,320)