The URL can be used to link to this page

03/09/1988 - City Council SpecialMINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL March 9, 1988 A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Wednesday, March 9, 1988 at 6:15 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and City Councilmembers Egan, Gustafson, McCrea and Wachter. Also present were Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and City Administrator Hedges. The purpose of the meeting was to receive an update on aircraft heading in north Eagan and direction to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission on the Organized Collection Study recently completed by Pope -Reid. Following this discussion, a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to hold the annual planned unit development reviews. AIRCRAFT HEADINGS AND THE EFFECTS OF NOISE IN NORTH EAGAN City Administrator Hedges introduced the issue of airport noise and the reasons why the City has monitored this issue during the past several years. He also stated that the City of Mendota Heights' city council is requesting a joint meeting with the Eagan City Council to review the air traffic corridors to agree on acceptable corridors for distributing the impact of air noise between the two (2) communities. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein presented a history of land use designation that was designed by each community to allow for the air traffic corridor, referring to a joint Eagan/Mendota Heights land use map that was prepared by planners representing the two communities. He then discussed the four noise zones and residential options within each zone. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein reviewed noise impact that has occurred as a direct result of deregulation that increased take -offs from 400 to over 1,000. In addition, he reviewed the Part 150 configurations that were different than the original noise contours. After presenting the original Part 150, he discussed the revised 150 that altered aircraft tracks toward Eagan creating more traffic over the northern part of the City. Following a fair and informative historical description of air traffic noise impacts on the City, the City Councilmembers expressed their concern at the present area of operations for air traffic noise in north Eagan is unfairly impacting the City. A number of questions were raised about future airport operations, including the proposed extension of the runway. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein described the proposed runway extension that is currently under consideration by the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein further reviewed three alternatives for noise contours stating that alternative 3 is the alternative recommended by the Airport Relations Committee, which basically maintains a small buffer between Country Home Heights and most departures. He stated that this alternative places departures in the vicinity of traditional Mendota Heights neighborhoods only during peak hours and then in a comparable level to Eagan neighborhoods. It was also determined that a joint meeting will be held with the City of Mendota Heights to discuss air traffic and the common corridor between the two communities. City Administrator Hedges stated that Council Minutes March 9, 1988 Monday, March 28 was a considered date for the joint meeting. After further discussion and consideration of airport noise issues, a motion was made by City Councilmember Egan, seconded by Wachter, with all members voting in favor, that a special City Council meeting be scheduled for Monday, March 28, 1988 at 7:00 p.m., to meet with the Mendota Heights City Council at the Eagan Municipal Center building to further discuss air traffic headings in the corridor that is currently separating the two communities. ORGANIZED COLLECTION STUDY Administrative Assistant Hohenstein opened the discussion briefly describing the Organized Collection Study and the method by which it was undertaken by the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and Pope -Reid Associates. He indicated that legislative mandates for abating the flow of waste to landfills that required that communities begin to address issues of recycling and how wastes are managed within their boundaries. He indicated that the Council's earlier acceptance and approval of the study required further discussion to allow the commission to begin narrowing the options presented in the study. Mayor Ellison stated that he is a supporter of market forces to provide services, but that the study had identified some inefficiencies in an open hauling system which some level of organization could reduce to the benefit of Eagan residents. Hohenstein stated that whichever paths were chosen it would be important to maintain some market forces to avoid eliminating small businesses or creating monopolies for large ones. After further discussion, the Council indicated that the Solid Waste Abatement Commission should engage the local haulers in a discussion of possible organization systems which would focus on sectoring the City into four to six residential districts with a specific number of haulers per district. Further, staff was directed to structure any organized system such that recyclables and yard wastes would always be collected on the same day in a particular district. Council also directed that in developing the system, staff design, contracts and license structure is such that administrative costs can be recouped, appropriate sanctions, including possible termination are addressed, as well as specific issues regarding recycling and landfill alternatives. ADJOURNMENT This part of the Special City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m., with discussion to follow regarding Planned Unit Developments. March 9, 1988 Dated City Clerk TLH/JDH MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 7, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 9, 1988 Please note that our meeting is scheduled to start at 6:15 p.m. The City Administrator recommended, with the concurrence of Mayor Ellison, that the joint meeting with the Mendota Heights City Council to discuss airport noise measures be rescheduled. The specific location of certain headings within the flight corridor is the topic for discussion. After considering the sensitivity of this issue and the fact that City Councilmembers Gustafson and McCrea have not had opportunity to share in background informa- tion regarding airport noise issues, it seemed appropriate to continue our meeting with the City of Mendota Heights' Council until later this month. The City Administrator and Administra- tive Assistant Hohenstein, who has been the staff person assigned to airport relations including airport noise, will provide. a brief update on the subject matter to the City Council. Also, if time permits, it would be helpful to discuss the organized col- lection study, all of you received a copy several weeks ago, and once direction is given regarding that matter, the staff can dis- cuss the City Council's direction with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission so that advisory group can formulate policy for con- sideration by the City Council. Enclosed for City Council review is a copy of a memo from Ad- ministrative Assistant Hohenstein discussing the airport noise issue and also a copy of the executive summary of the Pope -Reid study on organized collection. PUD REVIEW According to the City Code, Chapter 11.20e, Item 1, "the Planning Commission and Council shall review annually, after approval of the preliminary plan, the progress of each planned development to determine whether or not the applicant has substantially complied with the planned development agreement." Unfortunately, due to the rapid growth that has occurred in 198/198', time did not permit annual reviews and the process was waived by the City Council. The last annual PUD review was November 12, 1985. A joint meeting between the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review of the planned developments is advantageous. A joint meeting allows the APC members and City Council to share and benefit by each others comments and at the same time eliminates the need for an additional hearing if the APC and City Council held meetings independent of each other. There are four- teen (14) planned developments to be reviewed. The Planning Department has prepared a narrative review with attachments of each planned development that is scheduled for discussion by the APC and City Council. The City Planner will also provide an up- date on eight (8) planned developments that are new and did not require a formal review. OTHER BUSINESS There is no formal business scheduled at this time. ADJOURNMENT City Administrator cc: Tim Pawlenty, Chairman, APC All Members of the Advisory Planning Commission Dale Runkle, City Planner Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant TLH/kf TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM CITY ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN MARCH 7, 1988 EAGAN-MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR Attached you will find information pertinent to the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor Study which has been under study by the MAC, in concert with the two cities since last summer. This background information will serve as the basis for our discussion with the Council on Wednesday evening and for our joint meeting with Mendota Heights in the near future. Enclosed on pages 1-2 are definitions of the remaining alternatives to be considered by the two cities and recommended to MASAC for possible implementation. While the map is difficult to read without color coding, it generally consists of two sets of three contours for 75, 70 and 65 Ldn respectively. These are the federally recognized standards for noise, but they do not mean that noise magically ends at their boundaries. Rather, they can he useful in defining the focus of noise energy, or where the noise is the worst. On the Eagan side of the corridor, the remaining alternatives relate to the headings shown on page 3. As can be seen, the northerly of the two headings does a better job of utilizing the noise absorbing capacity of the Comprehensive Guide Commercial area highlighted on page 4. However, the complementary headings on the north side affect Mendota Heights neighborhoods in inverse proportion to the impact on Eagan neighborhoods. In approaching this issue, the MAC's consultant considered the issues on page 5. In the course of doing so it was determined that no known navigational aid could be utilized to a sufficient degree of accuracy to improve the situation. Therefore, it has become necessary to establish a mutually acceptable area of operations, understanding that aircraft may stray within or from it. Of the remaining alternatives, Mendota Heights would prefer the southerly alternative and Eagan is most likely best served by the northerly of the two. To illustrate this point, Mendota Heights prepared a population comparison which is found on page 6. However, 225 of the affected homes consist of the apartments located on Lexington Avenue and Mendota Heights Road which were constructed after the Metropolitan Planning Contours required performance standards for residential areas in the airport vacinity. This compares with the Eagan populations on page 7. As you will note the McKee Addition with its Commercial Comprehensive Guide designation has a profound effect on the total. In general, I would submit that differences in planning decisions over time have placed the two cities in a somewhat different position. Whereas, the City of Eagan has generally maintained a distance from the operations areas in its planning decisions, it has a relatively small number of residents in identified affected areas. Mendota Heights, on the other hand, has continued to make land use decisions which increase the number of homes in noise impacted areas and suggest that decisions be made on the basis of current land use. This is particularly serious in the so-called "Southeast Development Area" in Mendota Heights which the City has guided to be single and multiple -family residential, reducing the width of the commercial or undeveloped corridor by as much as one-half mile. We must strive to be good neighbors, but it would be ill advised to merely accept the consequences of such planning decisions. I believe that a reasonable compromise would be to attempt to center the impacts of the current, broader operations area on the traditional planning contours, understanding the impacts will spill over on each side. In general, however, the worst of the impact would continue to lie in between. In my judgement, this is best done through what is identified as Alternative #3. It maintains a small buffer between Country Home Heights and most departures. It places departures in the vicinity of traditional Mendota Heights neighborhoods only during peak hours and then in a comparable level to Eagan neighborhoods. Arrival traffic will still be concentrated along the southern boundary of the corridor. This alternative was recommended for Council for approval by the Airport Relations Committee at its December 8 meeting. A copy of the minutes is attached on pages 8-9. A brief presentation about the history of the Corridor and its current issues will be made Wednesday evening. I will also be available to respond to questions concerning the alternatives at that time. Att. nistrative Assistant 1988 PLANNED. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Name of Planned Development: Blackhawk Park Planned Development (north & south) Owner/Developer: Meritor Development Corporation Location: North - S 1/2 of Section 16 and N 1/2 of Section 21 South - Section 28 Date Initially Approved: June 21, 1977 Term of Planned Development: 15 years Date Reviewed: March 3, 1988 Prepared by: Planning Department I. LAND USES North Type of Use Area Single-family (R-1) residential 89.7 Townhouse (R-3) residential �9 Neighborhood business 14.9 Civic Center 15.4 Park (Blackhawk Lake Park) 12.49 Park (Civic Center park area) 4.04 North total 165.53 South Type of Use Area • Single-family (R-1) residential 35.7 Duplex (R-2) residential ' 70.5 * Townhouse (R-3) residential 19 Apartment (R-4) residential 15.9 Community shopping center and general business 30 Elementary school 15 Park 21.58 NSP easement 12.65 South total 220.33 Planned Development total 385.86 • Uses included in this area are pending City Council consideration 1988 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PAGE TWO II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED DURING THE PAST YEAR The Blackhawk Park planned development was last reviewed in 1985. At that time it was found that significant land use changes had occurred as a consequence of the realignment of I -35E. The principal focus of the 1985 review was to ascertain the specific distinctions from the land uses approved in June 1977 and those land uses proposed by the developer during the 1985 planned development review. Circumstances surrounding the Blackhawk Park planned development changed with the purchase of the property by Meritor Development Corporation from the previous owner, Ed Dunn of Dunn Real Estate. III. PROPOSED CHANGES Meritor Development Corporation has proposed and submitted for City Council consideration land uses that result in a reduced development density. On the north half of the Blackhawk Park planned development, undeveloped land has been proposed for single-family residential development. Specifically, this single-family residential replaces approved land uses of six to twelve units and twelve plus units per acre. In the south half of the Blackhawk Park planned development, single- family and townhouse land uses are proposed in an area where six to twelve units and twelve plus units per acre were previously approved. The overall result of these proposals has been a reduction in development density. All development proposals by Meritor Development Corporation have been approved by the City Council with the exception of the Thomas Lake Woods single-family and townhouse development. It is anticipated, however, that the City Council will give consideration to this proposal in the near future. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Planned Development Agreement was signed on January 21, 1977 for a fifteen -year period. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS MENTIONED Meritor Development Corporation has or will be proposing developments of a single-family and townhouse nature. The preponderance of proposed development will be single-family residential development. VI. PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS Parks dedication has proceeded in a timely and reasonable fashion with the Meritor Development Corporation. Park dedication, however, in that area labeled "Civic Center," has not been agreed upon to date. /1'7:00C. ISO du. High Density; -,,Medium I L) 'I \Ijgnsity • Y.,... , 1 014C1 QLACKIIAWK PARK 1110. (Nom)( i{II(. (lout.( ilsieciotit, let. nu, /./{ High .. Density s �l by cru. BLACKHAWK PARK INC. (SOUTH) LAGAN 5O® P. U. O. t ba ua ala w Mr .1011 laai�a Plaaaiag Ilnaaiatu, lac 37 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, EARL MELBRIDGE LOCATION: W 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECT 16 & PART OF SECT 17 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: DECEMBER 28, 1981 EXPIRATION DATE: 1996 TERM OF P.D.: 15 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT OWNER/DEVELOPER: I. LAND USES Single Fam., Duplex (R-1, R-2) Townhouse (R-3) TOTAL Limited Business - Site D - Site E TOTAL Park (PK) TOTAL ACREAGE ACRES DWELLING UNITS (DU) 44.9 32.9 77.8 18 15 33 10.2 121 163 230 393 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE PAST REVIEW Ashbury Road was completed to the southeast and the Yankee Doodle Road reconstruction was finished. With these now open, along with traffic demand strategies being used by Blue Cross, traffic conditions are currently manageable. The approximately 10 acre park was dedicated and now is being developed by the Eagan Parks Department. This includes a warming house/restroom building, a neighborhood softball field, walkways, tennis courts and ice rinks. The phasing of the development is proposed as follows: 1) 44.9 acres 2) 18 acres 3) 32.9 acres 4) 15 acres - 163 dwelling units Site D - limited business - 230 dwelling units - Site E - limited business (1985-1990) (1985-1990) (1985-1990) III. PROPOSED CHANGES At this time, staff knows of no proposed changes within the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Planned Development. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Planned Development Agreement was entered into on December 28, 1981. This agreement is for a 15 year period so long as Eagan grants timely approval of each phase of development. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS With the improvements to the roads in the area, the severe traffic problems of the past are now being minimized. There are no other problems at this time. NOTES: .• 5 EYT sr is SURF! CE` •if .oma • 'N. • PD • . de MEDIUM DENSITY 6-12 units/acre LIMITED BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL SITE C LIMITED BUSINESS Site Area 15.4 acres Proposed Max. Bldg. 190,000 sq.ft. PARK SITE B LIMITED BUSINESS Site Area 24.9 acres Proposed Max. Bldg. 370,000 sq. Development Complete Site Area 10.2!) acres Early Dedication Development Compl �Q 1= [2=1 6 C ❑ 4 SITE D LIMITED BUSINESS Site Anel 18 des 0 Propose Ma1d. Bldg. 175500 sq.ft (Includ 5 afire Ser 1p Center) u Propos Deva cii}mentL39 , -1997 SITE/ LIMITED BUSESS S1fe/Area 15.4 acres raposseed Max. Bldg. 190,000 sq.ft. Q p � 9 n9ye Aga C;) d I 1 1=1 LOW DENSITY 0-3 units/acre Proposed Trails SITE E LIMITED BUSINESS -- Site //l�ea 15 acres Propos-ed Max. Bldg. 740,000 sq.ft. Proposed Development 1992-199 LOW DENSITY 0-3 units/acre aee1, L:-1 GIC7r�1401=1 c11 p G1O a15Ave r=7c=if 1t7C11 QQ LF CZ1 1:;73 HIGH DENSITY D 12 or greater units/acre RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY Site Area 46.65 acres 163 units Proposed Development 1990-1995 BCBSM n r MEDIUM DENSITY 3-6 units/acre jj PUBLIC WORKS jll a t _._ ___COachma5Road — — TY es ent 1992-1997 a NEIGHBORHOOD PARK triBUSINESS Outline of Planned evelop ent Site e ri4 O0 D Qom °9, 2 ° p V�s, „F.] Qp ❑nn oq ( 'Proposed Land Use okliPcfarlics9 Wetlands;E&R€irc ion OQa ',I a Street Access Planned Development Concept Pian MiiMENIM November 1980 Revised: June 1981 February 1980 March 1988 0 100 400 600 1000 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PROJECTION DATA Dwelling RESIDENTIAL Acres Units Density Low Density 46.65 163 3.49 Medium Density 32.9 230 6.99 Total 79.55 393 4.94 Projected Projected Max. LIMITED BUSINESS Acres Population Bldg. (SQ. Ft.) Site D 18 650 175,000 Site E 15 500 140,000 Total 33 1,150 315,000 PARK (Completed) Acres Total Acres Developed 10.25 Total Acres to be Developed 112.55 Total 122.8 Exhibit G Density Chart Revised Feb.1988 Mar.1988 "cc r ( `3 t dog.. r 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGAN 40 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (75-3) OWNER/DEVELOPER: DAN DOLAN LOCATION: NE 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: NOVEMBER 5, 1975 EXPIRATION DATE: 1985 TERM OF P.D.: 10 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Parcel Acres Land Use Dwelling Units A 2.2 R-3 16 B 19.2 R-4 230 C 13.0 R-3 92 R.O.W. 5.2 Total 39.6 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW On May 6, 1986, the City Council approved one three-year extension of the P.D. agreement from the date of the expiration of the ten-year P.D. This three-year extension is in effect until November 5, 1988. The Deerfield Addition received preliminary plat approval on May 21, 1986 for 322 apartment units on approximately 37.8 acres but has not received final plat approval. III. PROPOSED CHANGES There have been no other changes submitted to staff at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT As mentioned earlier, the P.D. agreement was extended for three years to run until 1988. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS The developer has had some concern regarding parcel A (2.2 acres) and its assessments. These differences are currently being worked out. PATRICK EAGAN PERIDOT tP'K PA�tK R - I A R-2 -R B TyPARK::; 3R •„.t • 1. . -_ . __-.. .• �'i:•... • 1r. ..11 • lc • COUnrY •••---..-•- . AOAO , •• )p • 1 ) 1 :// Ji . , / • j \ • J (. ' - •'-',.:-.---' e •n�\ t /�\ �\;/ ///;�; R.,:� ••...... �'� • • e: - ' i > .7'....,,I.--•- '•... . 'PARCE'” �2---'--.1;--‹ •, .,,� CI ��'^ / j t2XG‹:--/ice ;1.8, r 1 r/;P,•4 ` 2/ ',1 Oo ' TO 902• JIJJJy1 '1 1} i J -J • :�- rte, y/ .'7 . • i 1°'`'4..x. ---d 1►; PARCEL t) o Ac. 113 DENOTES PO TENT;:.L RESICEN TIA: •, BUIL DINO AREA (qv 11 1 i{ 'r,�. Y1! ..t.• -t Cd u N.C4:...n 1 a 30 Parcel B 19.2 Acres Land use R-4 230 Dwelling Units pito pa -,Ed Parcel A 2.2 acres - Land use R.. 16 D.U. Parcel C 13 acres ± Land use R-3 92 Dwelling Units 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH (COMPRI HOTEL) EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND (RESIDENCE INN) OWNER/DEVELOPER: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: EXPIRATION DATE: TERM OF P.D.: DATE REVIEWED: PREPARED BY: I. LAND USES Site Office Park 2nd Office Park 4th Lemay Lake 2nd OFFICE PARK 2ND - OFFICE PARK 4TH - LEMAY LAKE 2ND - OFFICE PARK 2ND - OFFICE PARK 4TH - LEMAY LAKE 2ND - 1990 1991 1991 NW 1/4 OF SECT 3 NW 1/4 OF SECT 3 NW 1/4 OF SECT 10 MARCH 19, 1985 SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 MAY 6, 1986 OFFICE PARK 2ND - 5 YEARS OFFICE PARK 4TH - 5 YEARS LEMAY LAKE 2ND - 5 YEARS MARCH 4, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Acres Land Uses 28.7 5.07 4.36 General office uses Hotel & restaurant Residence Inn II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW The Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition received final plat approval in June 1986. One office building is now complete and approximately 40% leased. A second office building has been approved, but has not been built. The Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition received final plat approval in September 1986. The Compri Hotel is under construction with completion expected in the fall of 1987. The Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition received final plat approval in July 1986. The Residence Inn is under construction with completion expected in the fall of 1988. III. PROPOSED CHANGES No changes have been proposed in any of the Planned Developments at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Office Park 2nd P.D. Agreement was signed March 19, 1985 for a 5 - year term. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS Growth and development has been slower than expected in these planned developments. New buildings within these P.D.s are expected to be proposed as market conditions deem it necessary. NOTES: -J 1 cr 0 2 0 EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION FORNIOMPONNIM;4•4 Ww•••• • OW • MKS bal sA 4••••• •ev moms sky • tow•W~W.M.d.....014•••••••••WW 10 • aria s_loran. %mammal •••• 4.'"••• V411.1111.rn MEM "Cr imam simairow V , I ';'IldivocotarErataberrura".° •••••• "RN - N '`, 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK (82-2) OWNER/DEVELOPER: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: SW QUADRANT OF YANKEE DOODLE & LEXINGTON AVE., SECT 15 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: JUNE 6,1146- C - EXPIRATION DATE: 1995 TERM OF P.D.: 10 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Limited Business Community Shopping Center District R-4 (Residential -Multiple) General Business R/W - County Road 28 R/W - County Road 43 TOTAL 21.44 acres 32.64 acres 37.17 acres 2.07 acres 4.7 acres 1.87 acres 99.89 acres eflp oikL II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW Yankee Doodle Road reconstruction was completed from Lexington Avenue to the west. The ten -story office tower and daycare facility were completed and are occupied. Two portions of Town Centre Drive were renamed to Yankee Place and O'Leary Lane. The necessary park dedication requirements have been met. The new office building in the NW corner of P.D. is now occupied. III. PROPOSED CHANGES Application in 1988 to change SW portion of P.D. from Limited Business to Retail Commercial. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The planned development agreement was implemented in 1985 for a ten-year term. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS City staff needs current updated exhibits. J O m w > m O 0 m Hr M •m P z .> o Z r`s;r"z coo . M H 'r a m ;Z M ._ !® r o —! ,el M cn I . O H n i La :a 1 'Z m I'< n I • _ r. ! ..0 NV'Ia Hoa axs aasoaoxa s DC U1JK.11�4•: n 0 a a C 4-7 rr.. Ps IP tri vi a nu ex oft ff .00 0 0 ■ 0 r[ • • t G 11 E LrH It'Ritir1[ri</ J Q + r gr •M CrrncravJrow %: 7D I r 1 0 z. AO 0 0 1 r r „$„ TIaIHXa t41•00.08%.1 124913 t AVENUE . , ........ -- —1 502 0 a 01204 ,„.070 ,,,arros'l t 8'8 9 A re 27.0 00 -- srodoec •7. 30 3972: 0 C 1 *57,5A 0 0 ;;,7. .54 ••• ,..,,. 515Mt.'W t5. • _ . 4300(1 ( "007 CO. RD N04"41i - ( L I,TON AVENUE i 46: g 1 1 .-.. 50. 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGAN HILLS WEST (79-1 OWNER/DEVELOPER: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC. LOCATION: PART OF NW 1/4 OF SECT 29 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: APRIL 3, 1979 EXPIRATION DATE: 1994 TERM OF P.D.: 15 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Land Parcels Area Sun Cliff North (high density) 54.10 acres Meadowland (low density) 55.70 acres Sun Cliff South (medium density) 64.14 acres Commercial 49.4 acres High density residential 35.5 acres Cliff Lake 15.2 acres Parks (40.1) and right-of-way (70.0) 110.12 acres TOTAL 384.7. acres II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINE LAST REVIEW The Sun Cliff Additions are virtually complete with 71 single family units having been completed in the 4th and 5th additions. Fifty-eight units of multiple housing were also completed along Diffley Road. Cliff Lake Centre project was approved in 1988. III. PROPOSED CHANGES No changes are anticipated in land use designation of the planned development at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The planned development agreement was signed in April 1979 for a 15 -year period. This agreement allows for a maximum of 3,225 dwelling units. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Plans for development on the north side of Diffley Road are undetermined at this time. Staff is expecting a proposal for a shopping center in the NE quadrant of Cliff Road and Rahn Road in the area designated CSC - LB -RB and high density residential. It is expected to contain approximately 270,000 sq. ft. of building space with a Target store, a grocery store, and other smaller retail outlets. This project would use about 30 acres of the southern portion of the planned development. VI. PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS No problems are known at this time. A Dunn Cuny Community WEST A Planned Unit Development mum Dunn & Curt/ Real griefs Marsagemare, is;• )11 4944 VnOng DelVe • &info-, Minn. 66438 4. Land Use Plan ranarq tne.m.elal 1.4.0•1 . - SeCIP MN Mr* Idinevaa• SM. rn %4j :I W .0 cc 2 • _I, 'I Pitt Lake 1 % i t ` i ��..r• \. ; x11_.1 \. A Dunn c Cunt' CulnmuniA WEST A Funned Unit Development arTill •y tMn Dunn & DunRoad slobs aapaman/, �nc. iIR 41)40 V$dnU DHw.Mpla, 11011na1. 50435 1 Sketch Plan t x�s I.d/ r = Low Density Resid. r $ Park/Open Space m.d/r = Medium +1 : ®4 Trails h.d/r _ FIIg1, N Lout Moosm, u MN Ne[rl Iw.� Ser. Nrtmmooy NFtmms 1x101 pe In11IM11 Iu1xuY u"lnlnculnluullpn •• I • .i•Itl; „ . . • ) 2r • ; • .4. ('',Wz•"' :•_,,,-1;:l.:.'12,•'' zfi-- 4,,Ii'llr l'!ki.:a.''' t '. 'r .4 11';;;: '', ,i'',I's,' • I., P . ;4,4 il fe..hti r hi ...S:7. ' .- -..-..,,, .,-- • 'I NcirUvm SI itt0.9 Ocoittt - .1 ,• - - -; ,..?..,-..,...i.r.......} ------- -•-:•—•.2.7,---,.". .. . •_.:..1:'.. -.•-,--...,.'. ', ..-''T.,,,7 : :...v...•::.,.;,„ :--,;,1.7...,,.. , . I, ,, ' ,I• ..,:., ; • I ii( .,' • •-• ' I i: :', 1.. ..D..,!-;•,,,-- ni.-) 4:; ,-'*4,,,.•p , .„••••i• .., • ', 1111 ..,•,-'-• :.i..'1,,/,:c : •:,..'/ ' • :'''//'• I , /4 i ></ `i, ',':' .• • .: i'',',i, i....',;!'" r7% ' • :„...•,.'..'.. .(j(, ,:%;".•,,,,:',..^:,...., .,c . ,.,.?:„-i,..,../..444r,..,44,,,,./.44 . 4r. ....,.•... :-.-....,.. ••_..., • •..-.._) I %, • ' e • .• ". • . , • • • Rah Park . • - jt'tftl ( '14'460,44A • / / ) /.' if - _ t k A Dunn (3:: Curry Communitv WEST A Planned Unit Development '?4111 Dunn Curry "foal Rated. 1.4"rumw.ro.rt4. /no. la; la 4040 VIkIrKi Other • HiPia, PrMrw... 36436 DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE 11-1.01:214,111-11.l 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGAN WOODS/WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER (74-7) OWNER/DEVELOPER: TRAMMEL CROW - COLIN BARR LOCATION: PARTS OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 4 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: DECE,BER 20, 1984 EXPIRATION DATE: 1989 TERM OF P.D.: 5 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES In August 1985, 21.43 acres was rezoned to planned development. R.O.W. .6 acres Hotel 4.95 acres Office 18.2 acres Outlot (office retail) 16.49 acres 18.8 acres 21.43 Total + 40.23 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW One five -story office building on the NW corner of the site was completed on May 1, 1986 and is currently about 30% occupied. The Wyndham Corporate Center Addition received final plat approval on July 7, 1987. III. PROPOSED CHANGES Staff has not received any proposals for changes at this time. No new construction is foreseen in the near future. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Wyndham Corporate Center P.D. agreement was entered into on August 20, 1985 for a five-year term. Eagan may grant approval of two three-year extensions reasonably requested in writing at least sixty days prior to the expiration of the agreement. The Eagan Woods (Ravine Plaza) P.D. agreement was entered into on May 15, 1985 for a five-year term. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS None at this time. r Ake ../bvq 6.r L./s, Term,/e tw 744..nr/.R.v./We rE.e /^4,I4*. f /s . ., Tl7N, <IlW -• NO V!'if%✓ 8!740() 00006(x) MaiMn1 '--_ __ ij ca 00 r 0 •t 1131N30 31V80d1100 WVHaNAM Qo8 Nets',1 W 350 *1 1 j ' tt I ,11 +: Ag !MINNESOTA DEPT OF THANSPORTATiON 5;,/ I I tr.•N JJ'N �I •i... FXF. I ` M -e -t • •" f"' t RI;lHr Ori WAY Pt. A r Nis. IR 32 •• . I I ;.t .'7-'1'4, 1�IS;N ,;, , — X C E P T I O N - . - - I - - - 31 f: C.S.A.H. N0. 31 ;,� '�Hbr'.J.,) S1'A'1'E' Th NK n.J...Nlrf!-IN.r`�.1�' I .•'. NO ?•1 ..C,AD; `$(PILOT KNOB ROAD)1'8 ly;;oo.00 I I I, r..,A:, J... MO'00/0.O ) Ago if : , C S A H NO 31,7„.4(PILOT ;' KNC;,t ` t .• AV .1•• ',iv ♦N♦ sl! 1.. }'�!•J 711000 r,.,.,..0'..,0'..,n,i;SF.• sn,..v.//..4. 6.+t./$,rllN,tllw••' 79v1...r/...r y.aN«./s.•..r, •/ N.r• Tlr M, .l rtW 1 1 m'• !.V. }y m F0.p, T'g E43YS Y, o+ 0. 'a ; r- o ill ii4, lc' 6 ig ISA a e ,I � g�la 4�" nc X uJ 1: WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER Trammell CrowCompany 1987 CONCEPT PLAN 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: GOPHER-EAGAN INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL PARK (76-1) OWNER/DEVELOPER: GOPHER SMELING COMPANY (IRVING KUTOFF) LOCATION: PART OF THE N 1/2 SECT 13 (SEE EXHIBIT) DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: JULY 20, 1976 EXPIRATION DATE: 1991 TERM OF P.D.: 15 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Office Residential (R-1 - R-4) Park & ponding Industrial Streets & right-of-ways 19 acres 44 acres 33 acres 209 acres 38 acres TOTAL 423 acres II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW A preliminary plat for the Gopher -Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition containing nine lots and two outlots on approxinately 84 acres designated for industrial use was approved by the APC in June 1987. This proposal plats all of the industrial land on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road into three blocks. This is consistent with the original P.D. agreement. On the east side of T.H. 149 is a 34 acre lot that is to be developed by Consolidated Freight. U.P.S. is expanding their facilities with a new building; it is expected to open by the end of 1987. West Publishing purchased approximately 190 acres from Gopher Smelting Company. III. PROPOSED CHANGES City staff has not received any plans for changes within the Gopher - Eagan Industrial Park. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Gopher Industrial Residential Park was initiated on July 20, 1976 and was granted a 15 year period for development activities. This Development Agreement will mature in 1991. The Development Agreement, however, does make provision for the extension of the development period. It states that the developer may request two 5 -year extensions which may or may not be granted by the City of Eagan. On March 18, 1980, the Planned Development Agreement was amended regarding the dedication of parkland within the Gopher -Eagan Planned Development. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Staff is not aware of any plans for future development. The owner continues to actively market the undeveloped property. VI. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS IDENTIFIED At the present time, there appears to be no problems or concerns with the Gopher -Eagan Planned Development. NOTES: S • ? t • •r rT• Y �. • 0 0 0 •::..7,. • a . or —4 —4 m m --4 N 0 T T Y1 -0 0 M —4 , • .1 ;! II \ N I.♦ 1. 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: LAUKKA-BECK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OWNER/DEVELOPER: LARRY LAUKKA-WARREN BECK LOCATION: SECT 1 IN SE QUADRANT OF I-494 AND T.H. 149 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: MAY 7, 1985 EXPIRATION DATE: 1995 TERM OF P.D.: 10 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES (See attached chart) II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW Northwest Airlines merged with Republic in 1986, creating changes in their overall requirements on their site. This has included acquiring an additional 33.9 acres of the Ames Homestead and R.E.S. parcel along the northern edge of the site which are now included in a proposed amendment to the P.D. This proposed amendment also includes an additional 1,613,309 sq. ft. of floor space for Northwest by the year 2020. The total additional sq. ft. for the entire P.D. would be 1,075,819 by 2020 as other portions of the P.D. reduce their building area. The Northwest Corporate Headquarters received Certificate of Occupancy in October 1986 and the 264,000 sq. ft. N.A.T.C.O. Building is currently being finished with occupancy expected by the end of 1987. Roadway work is also being finished between the two buildings and for the new entrance to the north onto O'Neill Road. The last leg of I-494 from T.H. 149 east to T.H. 110 was opened in November of 1986 and O'Neill Road is just now being completed from T.H. 149 to Inver Grove Heights. Cray received preliminary plat approval in June 1987 for one 36.2 acre lot and 80.2 acres of outlots along Lone Oak Drive in the southern portion of the P.D. This will be for a campus setting with various buildings throughout. The Blue Ridge Addition received preliminary plat approval in May 1987 for one 9.8 acre lot and 37.25 acres in outlots for a 90,000 sq. ft. office/showroom on the corner of Lone Oak Parkway and Lone Oak Drive. Utility and grading work has recently started in both of these additions. III. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed amendment to the P.D. by Northwest as outlined earlier is the major change foreseen in this P.D. at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Planned Development Agreement for the Laukka-Beck P.D. was entered into on May 7, 1985. This is for a 10 year term provided that Eagan grants timely approval of each plat in the development. This will need to be amended if the proposed P.D. changes of Northwest Airlines are adopted. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Future development of office and retail space in the Laukka-Beck P.D. will occur as market conditions dictate. No other plans have been submitted at this time. VI. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS Traffic along T.H. 149 during a.m. peak hours is at only a fair level of service at this time. It is expected that as future development occurs in the area, the traffic conditions will only worsen without any mitigative measures. Northwest, Cray and others will be meeting in the second half of 1987 to work on a plan of possible solutions to the traffic situation in the entire P.D. area. 1985 ORIGINAL PLAN AND 1987 PROPOSED AMENDMENT OVERALL LAUKKA-BECK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMPARISON 1985 Original Plan 1987 Proposed Amendment Site Area Building Area Site Area Building Area YEAR 2005 In Acres In Square Ft. ISP In Acres In Square Ft. NWA 113.4 641,600 845,090 190.3 2,254,909 Wachovia 220.3 2,500,000 2,296,510 114.9 1,096,510 Cray 116.4 1,200,000 Laukka-Beck 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR 2005 TOTAL 333.7 3,141,600 3,141,600 421.6 4,551,419 YEAR 2005-2020 NWA 43.0 495,000 0 0 0 Wachovia 47.0 234,000 0 36.0 395,000 Cray 0 0 Laukka-Beck 28.3 351,000 0 28.3 351,000 YEAR 2020 TOTAL 118.3 1,080,000 0 64.3 746,000 YEAR 1985 TO 2020 TOTAL 452.0 4,221,600 485.9 5,297,419 TOTAL P.D. BUILDING AREAS 1987 NWA Proposed Amendment to P.D. 5,297,419 1985 Laukka-Beek P.D. 4� 221,600 DIFFERENCE 1,075,819 -7L\\ • H. ICI • • • 11 ;' • ( 01 AUDITOR'S SUBD, NO. 42 • . • : TENTATIVE -1'7 94 1987 PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PROPOSED MASTER PLAN '.IV�I�11 •Ao1O1�•�NJ; j0 110 / v Z W 2 4 0 LU w 0 W co MASTER PLAN 0 0 • • • •g ngX 0: Co --. \/OU daoa \•� u , ,'v d— ,r W,� lijz G. 19716..1/........ Vine�iWOtil Laukka—Beck 22282 aaaa (7 M V m m 05 0 N (D 8 J Q A Y N Z 00000 U 0 0 (13 0 O O 0 oV) cd ' OO)) NAME OF P.D.: OWNER/DEVELOPER: LOCATION: 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (82-3) JIM CURRY PART OF NE 1/4 SECT 22, W 1/2 SECT 23, MOST OF SECT 2 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: JULY 21, 1975 EXPIRATION DATE: 1990 TERM OF P.D.: 15 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Residential (R-1 - R-4) 854 acres Park & OPEN SPACE 58 acres Commercial 84 acres Churches 40 acres TOTAL 1,036 acres II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW Danbury Place with 17 single family lots, Lexington Pointe 1st and 2nd with 230 single family lots, Lexington Parkview with 54 single family lots and Summer Place (Summerfield) with 37 single family lots have started through the platting process. Building continued in Westbury, Lexington Square, Lexington Hills, Ches Mar East, Northview, Sunset 4th, 6th, 7th, 10th, 11th, Oakwood, Wedgewood, Sheffield, Fawn Ridge, Wilderness Park II and Canterbury Forest. III. PROPOSED CHANGES Transfer of ownership from Jim Curry to Tri -Land. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The planned development agreement was entered into on June 21, 1976 and is for 15 years. The owner may request two 5 -year extensions if mutually agreed upon by the City. Staff would like to remind City Council and Planning Commission members of an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development Agreement that was adopted by the City Council on February 7, 198)4. This amendment affected the development of land located south of Wescott Road and east of Lexington Avenue and allowed the developer to transfer an R- 3 density from parcel two to parcel three. At the same time, parcel two was granted an R-2 density (see the enclosed exhibit.) The rationale for this change in the original agreement was twofold: density of residential development was reduced by 360 dwelling units and a more favorable transition in land use was achieved. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS At the present time, there appears to be no problems with the Lexington South Planned Development. NOTES: 2 • -}•• .• • • • s:::. *434. 0 A . fg Z.? y Arigal .lamj • C'; ,71ROSEtrIOU WESTBURY (GABBERTS) R -3-I .1 METHODIST CHURCH LUTHERAN CHURCH OF AMERICA LUTHERAN — BRETHREN TY PARK EAGAN WATER RESERVOIR WM. SODERHOLM-45 NW BELL Exception pan6ur .exc.ptlo R-/ 2 LEXINGTON SQUARE (NORTHLAND DEVELOPMENT) . ATHLETIC FIELDS TRI LAND R-3-1 Ath.Fleld 3 6 Lexirty1" it Parkview LEXINGTON HILLS CodR-4 o, 1.-K; 4 C1/2, \ H -Z R-4 (—Th KENSINGTON PLACE WILDERNESS PARK 11 R-1 26 ( D . C.F. ) EPISCOPAL CHURCH) L I zI 1 0 z R-4 cam 7b r:a Court Par K CANTERBURY R-1 27 CHES MAR (GABBERTS)/ ICHES MAR R-2 , (GABBERTS) 8 ' Arid 8 R- I-/ Northvlew Elementary FUTURE HIGH SCHOOL SITE CSAH 30 I R-3 e onlmercla 1 EAGAN CENTE CSC 9 TRI LAND Park STATUS OF LEXINGTON SOUTH PUD NA: /04,< 44. d C.• A. -,i,t. +. o f IVO a.uu<_, THIS MAP DOES NOT REFLECT PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT R-1 Lexlnj ton Pointe R- 1 NSP Easement vv/L ark c (SIENNA) WEDGWOOD R-3- I 17 HIDDEN VALLEY r -� i '` (SIENNA) WEDGWOOD �' R-8 -' PIcPi� 10 1ST FED. HASTINGS ) OAKWOOD I.4 NORTHVIEW MEADOWS (TCF & SIENNA) p 1�m //Prk / \ �-- �r ParK� —� _ / SUMMERFIELD R \ R1=2 14� �' \``RI LAND )R-2 // OAK WOOD �� 1,10 (( 1J1 FAWN RIDGE r(I / OAK (TCF & SIENNA) \(( POND R- I 20 ( TRI LAND ) SUNSET 6TH R -Z- f " R-/ 11 SUNSET 4TH ( TRI LAND) CHRISTIAN I MISSIONARY MISSOUR ALLIANCE SYNOD CHURCH Amp R- I----- j'�f i rS dale n I AdAdd. 121 exception OVERVIEW ESTATES R-11- 12 ' \�\ �c\ q l r a airCompanies__ _ UDURBAN. ENGINEERING. INC. CSAH 32 JIM CURRY 4817 UPPER TERRACE MPLS. MN. 55435 (612) 927-9351 1.1 EXHIBIT E Lexington South north nxlrrxu.l 0 Irl..1.lw.11.nn.11.11-Il10;M ul.wllM1l y/1 Land Use Plan R1 s.f. (0-3un./ao.) R2 mix. res.(3.6un./ac.) R3 mix.res.(6.12un./ac.) R4 multiple (12+un./ac.) LB ltd. bus. GB gen.bus. CSC comm.shpng.cntr. C) parks -open space ■ e hiking trail ..r.r all-purpose trail -- . bikes A report for Norwest is not included. 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: SPLASHLAND WATERPARK (82-4) OWNER/DEVELOPER: TOM WEBSTER LOCATION: PARTS OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: MARCH 16, 1982 EXPIRATION DATE: 1987 TERM OF P.D.: 5 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I.L AND USES 44/1_7'acres that were originally designated for G.B. (General Business) /J uses were considered in the original (Bliffview) P.D. agreement. The Splashland preliminary plat is still in place but has not been finalized or built to date. II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW No construction activity has occurred in this planned development. III. PROPOSED CHANGES No changes are being proposed at this time. However, a new proposal and P.D. agreement are possible by the end of 1987 from a new owner/developer. IV.. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The owner has asked for a one-year extension of his P.D. agreement to run until March 1988, as the original agreement has expired. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS Other than the term of the original P.D. agreement, no problems are known. 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: WINKLER/JACKSON PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (82-3) OWNER/DEVELOPER: RICHARD WINKLER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 31 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: JULY 6, 1982 EXPIRATION DATE: JULY 6, 1987 TERM OF P.D.: 5 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Zoning Acreage Dwelling Units Neighborhood business 7.74 acres Limited business 8.98 acres Single family 34.95 acres 99 Townhouse 22.00 acres 92 Multiple 10.22 acres 143 Park 7.7 acres TOTAL 91.54 acres 334 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW The Oak Cliff 4th Addition consisting of 32 single family lots on 12.8 acres received final plat approval in 1986. The Oak Cliff Pond 1st Addition, consisting of 42 townhouses, and 2nd Addition consisting of 33 townhouses, received plat approval in 1987. The Cliff Road Shoppes on Outlot D was approved by the City Council. III. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT No new development is anticipated in the near future. IV. PROPOSED CHANGES There are no other changes being proposed at this time. 1 -V. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The planned development agreement was entered into on July 6, 1982 for a five-year period and this expired on July 6, 1987. Mr. Winkler has indicated that an extension of the P.D. agreement will be requested from the City Council. VI. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS None other than the details on the P.D. agreement extension. NOTES: 2 • JP�fl .— O HIGH oo SCHOOL 44, • R'L • RB 'ir�1v}w.Ap�yyy.�,. F1� WINKLER/JACKSON PD (82-3) 7 A SAP ESxA- .A" nett, a • • DoF'x "eici.<75,5 ?(- VTh -6 wilecc 1-61 6 ( 11A 1-ar.5 56.A(.5.(0)--- 311 UN Ir) JO. Zz uN GoirG AmoCintes Inc EMID7IT PkF ("1"). lOstN tiew2rry EAGAN, MINN. 'Ll STATE AIDS "nr". ..". NIG NWAY.'"."r NO +1 32'x• Ivr ROAD 1 rar OAK CLIFF I3RD ADDITION.1 X64+ I(AM0C0 STATION); NO OUTLOT Cr • et, 1'i41 Si 101 KL • SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY MARCH 9, 1988 615 P.M. I. ROLL CALL II. DISCUSSION RE: AIRPORT NOISE, ORGANIZED COLLECTION STUDY III. P.U.D. REVIEW/JOINT MEETING WITH ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS TO BE REVIEWED: * Blackhawk Park * Blue Cross/Blue Shield * Cedar Cliff Commercial • Eagan t) * Eagandale Office Park/Lemay Lake 2nd Add. * Eagan Heights Commercial * Eagan Hills West * Eagan Woods Office Park & Wyndham * Gopher Eagan * Laukka-Beck * Lexington South * Norwest * Splashland Water Parks * Winkler/Jackson NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NOT UP FOR REVIEW: * Bridal Ridge * Burr Oak Hills * Dallas Development 2nd * Deerwood Addition * Eagandale Industrial Park 9th * Hills of Stone Bridge * Northwest Airlines * Pondview MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES MARCH 7, 1988 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 9, 1988 Please note that our meeting is scheduled to start at 6:15 p.m The City Administrator recommended, with the concurrence of Mayor Ellison, that the joint meeting with the Mendota Heights City Council to discuss airport noise measures be rescheduled. The specific location of certain headings within the flight corridor is the topic for discussion. After considering the sensitivity of this issue and the fact that City Councilmembers Gustafson and McCrea have not had opportunity to share in background informa- tion regarding airport noise issues, it seemed appropriate continue our meeting with the City of Mendota Heights' Council until later this month. The City Administrator and Administra- tive Assistant Hohenstejn, who has been the staff person assigned to airport relations including airport noise, will provide a brief update on the subject matter to the City Council. Also, if time permits, it would be helpful to discuss the organized col- lection study, all of you received a copy several weeks ago, and once direction is given regarding that matter, the staff can dis- cuss the City Council's direction with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission so that advisory group can formulate policy for con- sideration by the City Council. Enclosed for City Council review is a copy of a memo from Ad- ministrative Assistant Hohenstein discussing the airport noise issue and also a copy of the executive summary of the Pope -Reid study on organized collection. PUD REVIEW According to the City Code, Chapter 11.20e, Item 1, "the Planning Commission and Council shall review annually, the preliminary plan, the after approval of progress of each planned development to determine whether or not the applicant has substantially complied with the planned development agreement." Unfortunately, due to the rapid growth that has occurred in 1987/1988, time did not permit annual reviews and the process was waived by the City Council. The last annual PUD review was November 12, 1985. A joint meeting between the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review of the planned developments is advantageous. A joint meeting allows the APC members and City Council to share and benefit by each others comments and at the same time eliminates the need for an additional hearing if the APC and City Council held meetings independent of each other. There are four- teen (14) planned developments to be reviewed. The Planning Department has prepared a narrative review with attachments of each planned development that is scheduled for discussion by the APC and City Council. The City Planner will also provide an up- date on eight (8) planned developments that are new and did not require a formal review. OTHER BUSINESS There is no formal business scheduled at this time. ADJOURNMENT City Administrator cc: Tim Pawlenty, Chairman, APC All Members of the Advisory Planning Commission Dale Runkle, City Planner Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant TLH/kf TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM CITY ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN MARCH 7, 1988 EAGAN-MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR Attached you will find information pertinent to the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor Study which has been under study by the MAC, in concert with the two cities since last summer. This background information will serve as the basis for our discussion with the Council on Wednesday evening and for our joint meeting with Mendota Heights in the near future. Enclosed on pages 1-2 are definitions of the remaining alternatives to be considered by the two cities and recommended to MASAC for possible implementation. While the map is difficult to read without color coding, it generally consists of two sets of three contours for 75, 70 and 65 Ldn respectively. These are the federally recognized standards for noise, but they do not mean that noise magically ends at their boundaries. Rather, they can be useful in defining the focus of noise energy, or where the noise is the worst. On the Eagan side of the corridor, the remaining alternatives relate to the headings shown on page 3. As can be seen, the northerly of the two headings does a better job of utilizing the noise absorbing capacity of the Comprehensive Guide Commercial area highlighted on page 4. However, the complementary headings on the north side affect Mendota Heights neighborhoods in inverse proportion to the impact on Eagan neighborhoods. In approaching this issue, the MAC's consultant considered the issues on page 5. In the course of doing so it was determined that no known navigational aid could be utilized to a sufficient degree of accuracy to improve the situation. Therefore, it has become necessary to establish a mutually acceptable area of operations, understanding that aircraft may stray within or from it. Of the remaining alternatives, Mendota Heights would prefer the southerly alternative and Eagan is most likely best served by the northerly of the two. To illustrate this point, Mendota Heights prepared a population comparison which is found on page 6. However, 225 of the affected homes consist of the apartments located on Lexington Avenue and Mendota Heights Road which were constructed after the Metropolitan Planning Contours required performance standards for residential areas in the airport vacinity. This compares with the Eagan populations on pae 7. As you will note the McKee Addition with its Commercial Comprehensive Guide designation has a profound effect on the total. In general, I would submit that differences in planning decisions over time have placed the two cities in a somewhat different position. Whereas, the City of Eagan has generally maintained a distance from the operations areas in its planning decisions, it has a relatively small number of residents in identified affected areas. Mendota Heights, on the other hand, has continued to make land use decisions which increase the number of homes in noise impacted areas and suggest that decisions be made on the basis of current land use. This is particularly serious in the so-called "Southeast Development Area" in Mendota Heights which the City has guided to be single and multiple -family residential, reducing the width of the commercial or undeveloped corridor by as much as one-half mile. We must strive to be good neighbors, but it would be ill advised to merely accept the consequences of such planning decisions. I believe that a reasonable compromise would be to attempt to center the impacts of the current, broader operations area on the traditional planning contours, understanding the impacts will spill over on each side. In general, however, the worst of the impact would continue to lie in between. In my judgement, this is best done through what is identified as Alternative #3. It maintains a small buffer between Country Home Heights and most departures. It places departures in the vicinity of traditional Mendota Heights neighborhoods only during peak hours and then in a comparable level to Eagan neighborhoods. Arrival traffic will still be concentrated along the southern boundary of the corridor. This alternative was recommended for Council for approval by the fAirphe minutesRelations is attachedCommittee on pages December 8 meeting. A copy 8-9. A brief presentation about the history of the Corridor and its current issues will be made Wednesday evening. I will also be available to respond to questions concerning the alternatives at that time. Ad'nistrative Assistant Att. 10-5-87 1'.i !.. 3 �� i..j P. O. BOX 11700 . • Scu,Nt PoLt TWIN CITY AIRPORT OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR To: John Hohenstein, City of Eagan Kevin Frazell, City of Mendota Heights From: Steve Vecchi Ey" MINNESOTA 55111 PHONE (612) 726-1892 Enclosed are the results of the LDN 65,70,75 contours generated by HNTB that were based on the following assumptions agreed at the September 23,1987 meeting: Alternative /#2 Alternative #3 11L,R DEPARTURES SIMULTANEOUS (65%) NON -SIMULTANEOUS (35%) 11R.- 115 11L - 100 11R - 110 11L - 095 11R - 110 11L - 115 11R - 110 11L - 115 NOTE: As you may recall, the Operations Committee decided to deal with the LDN contours for the two alternatives (65° simultaneous dep. & 35% non -simultaneous dep.) rather than consider a L1065 contour, which only deals with peak, 100% simultaneous departures. I would appreciate if you could bring the completed population estimates that correspond to alternatives #1 & #2 to the next scheduled meeting, Tuesday October 20, 1987 at 10:00 am. If you have any questions, please give me a call. OFFICE LOCATION --0040 28(h AVE. SO. -WEST TERMINAL AREA -MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1. NU JOJM1".J,b ® z aa17 •'01 �a • • e1..�Urr PPP,* 1•.j wScr'i Co b 3, I/ 11 II II 11= S+ 11C. ') aVwA1 .won.snbr . w04331,131 i ti L'jOS3UUiiN 9 a •1 MENdOTA HTS. ��)g ..— •I L.• •.1 cOk1CA ry.1.41. ..4.y hit ..Rw, MOM M • IC ' PP"^ E'1 COI IIIA APPLE .'I VALLEY pp i I Zoning Map Indexing A - 4MiCULTUAAL I - 11/1 /WLK /4C11.17M1 M1 - 01l1411.0A11000 .0VM11 IIAI /..1111 01 - la MAMA. 101111/1 1 - 1114711 Al - MO.0 Li OL 10111.111 A•I - I0U4.1 0.1/11.1 C1C - C011.1.111 Inc,. MIEN 1'1 - 00011 ALC - 1.114,010a. II0"Ii11p COMA 0.4 - 0Oe01.d011 LI - 11w11 IMWIIAIAL ^'1 'A - .0111.( III - III IMOu17A1.44.1"114.- ..11.4.1 /1011t 0 - 11I1ACM 040 OlvCLOluIMI 11 - Le1711/0111411 /I - /L000 KAIM o N N 0\ N MENbOTA N NTS. \ 0 2 r� 200 • • 2600 '1' :r A 3000 A 3200 3600 800 H•IC 0') A 4200 4400 H•IC l n•lc 460L Sand Gall A 4800 5000 Zoning Map - City of Eagan 21111' 11/1/1404 1/ Zoning Map Indexing A11CUUIU.Al PI I - (III IW4.4 //1111111 1111 11111 [ - 11111( 1•I - IO111 IA61144 1.1 - 00,46.1 1.1 - I010010.. 1 1 -U14 1( - u.ni[4 OVARIES( 1lMIg00 1101115 UFL 11l WliFl 11 AVAL1 1.1 1r1.111 411I Ind IPi. "FICA IOIF Al t1.. .F4 onllOPttFl EAGAN/MENDOMA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR 11L/R Departures Discussion Worksheet 1. Develop a Tower Operational Standard for "Non -Simultaneous" Departures (to be used primarily for late hours, light daytime hours). a. Study whether a "non -simultaneous" condition could be used during "simultaneous" condition with 2 controllers. 2. Develop a Tower Operational Standard for "Simultaneous" Departures (to be used primarily during busy hours). a. Define narrowest area of safety for FAA and airlines regarding 11L/R departure separations. b. Establish width of the cone (air space and ground track) for simultaneous 11L, 11R departure events; 11L, 11L departure events; 11R, 11R departure events. c. Study each possible 11L/R departure heading combination and how it relates to noise exposure and ground tracking. Example: 11R - 115° / 11L - 095° 11R - 110° / 11L - 090° 11R - 105° / 11L - 090° d. Compare current L10/LEQ noise contour with Met Council's contour and explain how changes could affect the contours. 3. Study the possibility of establishing an "in cockpit" procedure to standardize the point at which 11L/R departing aircraft start their turn. a. VOR/DME reference point. 4. Study the possibility of installing a navigational aid to keep aircraft in corridor. 5. Omit "runway heading" command for 11L/R departures. Use 115° to avoid pilot confusion in interpretation of tower commands. 6. Study the feasibility of waivering the 15° separation in the corridor in conditions at or above 2,200 feet when visibility is O5 miles. 7. Require all aircraft (props included) to fly the "3 -mile" departure rule during nighttime hours (2300-0600). MENDOTA HEIGHTS HOUSEHOLDS 1n 0 Ldn CONTOURS ALTERNATIVE Total 65+ 0 n u'1 N I 0 -1- Lr N N N '-+ 0 CPI CD co o, 1-1 m 11 �,y ro•l 'IN ("1 {V u) �O 0 lr1 CO M N N O O O '-1 N c ) KDF/9-22-87 Homes Comp Guided Residential CITY OF EAGAN OVERFLIGHT IMPACT ALTERNATIVES Alternative 2 Alternative 3 17 11 Homes Comp Guided 120 115 Commmercial 137 126 1 Subject to Approval MINUTES OF THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE Eagan, Minnesota December 8, 1987 A regular meeting of the Airport Relations Committee was held on Tuesday, December 8, 1987 at 7:05 p.m. Present were Chairman John Gustin, Carolyn Braun, Dustin Mirick and Joe Harrison. Absent were Carol Dozois and Tom Baker. Also present was Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant. MINUTES Upon motion by Harrison, seconded by Braun, all members voting in favor, the minutes of the November 10, 1987 Airport Relations Committee meeting were -approved as amended. AGENDA Upon motion by Mirick, seconded by Harrison, all members voting in favor, the agenda was approved. MC KEE ADDITION COUNCIL ACTION Administrative Assistant Hohenstein reviewed correspondence forwarded to the MAC on behalf of the City Council and distributed copies to McKee residents in attendance. Hohenstein indicated that the correspondence in no way obligates the City to undertake any program but opens the door for discussion with the MAC in the areas of purchase assurance, sound insulation and full property purchase. The Committee discussed the impact of deregulation on the entire area surrounding the airport, specifically, that in the Eagan -Mendota Heights area. Discussion was had concerning the possibility of reregulation of the industry and the affect that might have on the number of operations in the area. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AIRPORT ADEQUACY POSITION Administrative Assistant Hohenstein indicated that the local chamber of commerce was preparing a position paper on the adequacy of the Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport. He indicated that the basic outline of the position paper was in relationship of noise abatement to airport adequacy, technological and on-site improvements and direct and indirect economic impacts. Hohenstein indicated that he would keep the committee abreast of any developments in the area of the chamber position. EAGAN - MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR STUDY Hohenstein gave a brief description of the progress made on the study to date and explained that questions had been raised concerning separation farther north than 15 degrees from center line as a result of possible interference with the St. Paul Downtown Airport glide slope. He indicated that the tower had stated that they could only give departure procedures in 5 degree increments leaving the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights to choose between two alternatives, one with greater impacts to the north and the other with greater impacts to the south. Harrison pointed out that at the bare minimum there needs to be a commitment to staying north of the runway center line. Hohenstein stated that he believed this to be an enforcement issue which should be separate from the policy issue of establishing the appropriate headings. Hohenstein proposed that a compromise be forwarded to Mendota Heights which would take into account magnetic shifts and allowed departure to occur at the 5 degree increment immediately north of runway center line. A guest questioned whether aircraft instruments would allow such a procedure to be implemented. Hohenstein responded that he did not know but that it could be a basis for future discussions with the City of Mendota Heights. Members indicated that the appropriate position for the City would be to recommend a previously studied alternative which best serves to focus the traffic near the middle of the Metropolitan Planning Contours. Upon motion by Harrison, seconded by Mirick, all members voting in favor, the Commission recommended that the City Council endorse corridor study alternative number 3 which includes a left turn of 5 degrees from the middle marker from Runway 11R and a separation turn of 20 degrees from the center line of Runway 11L. PREFERENTIAL RUNWAY SYSTEM MODIFICATION Administrative Assistant Hohenstein reported that the MASAC Operations Committee was discussing possible modifications of the preferential runway system to increase distributional equity around the airport. Mirick indicated that any PRS modification or equity system is specifically designed by Minneapolis City Councilmember Steve Kramer to relieve noise impacts in South Minneapolis. Therefore, he said that any such proposal would inherently skew traffic in the other three directions regardless of intent. After further discussion, upon a motion by Gustin, seconded by Harrison, all members voting in favor, it was recommended that the City not endorse any changes to the preferential runway system and that correspondence be prepared by staff indicating that any discussion should require traffic to stay within the established Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor. And, further, that no system under consideration be predicated on an extension of Runway 4/22. NEXT MEETING The next meeting was tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, January 12, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Mirick, seconded by Braun, all members voting in favor, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Date Chairperson Secretary JDH 1988 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Name of Planned Development: Blackhawk Park Planned Development (north & south) Owner/Developer: Meritor Development Corporation Location: North - S 1/2 of Section 16 and N 1/2 of Section 21 South - Section 28 Date Initially Approved: June 21, 1977 Term of Planned Development: 15 years Date Reviewed: March 3, 1988 Prepared by: Planning Department I. LAND USES North Ty e of Use Area Single-family (R-1) residential 89.7 Townhouse (R-3) residential �9 Neighborhood business 14.9 Civic Center 15.4 Park (Blackhawk Lake Park) 12.49 Park (Civic Center park area) 4.04 North total 165.53 South Type of Use Area • Single-family (R-1) residential 35.7 Duplex (R-2) residential 70.5 • Townhouse (R-3) residential 19 Apartment (R-4) residential 15.9 Community shopping center and general business 30 Elementary school 15 Park 21.58 NSP easement 12.65 South total 220.33 Planned Development total 385.86 • Uses included in this area are pending City Council consideration 1988 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PAGE TWO II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED DURING THE PAST YEAR The Blackhawk Park planned development was last reviewed in 1985. At that time it was found that significant land use changes had occurred as a consequence of the realignment of I -35E. The principal focus of the 1985 review was to ascertain the specific distinctions from the land uses approved in June 1977 and those land uses proposed by the developer during the 1985 planned development review. Circumstances surrounding the Blackhawk Park planned development changed with the purchase of the property by Meritor Development Corporation from the previous owner, Ed Dunn of Dunn Real Estate. III. PROPOSED CHANGES Meritor Development Corporation has proposed and submitted for City Council consideration land uses that result in a reduced development density. On the north half of the Blackhawk Park planned development, undeveloped land has been proposed for single-family residential development. Specifically, this single-family residential replaces approved land uses of six to twelve units and twelve plus units per acre. In the south half of the Blackhawk Park planned development, single- family and townhouse land uses are proposed in an area where six to twelve units and twelve plus units per acre were previously approved. The overall result of these proposals has been a reduction in development density. All development proposals by Meritor Development Corporation have been approved by the City Council with the exception of the Thomas Lake Woods single-family and townhouse development. It is anticipated, however, that the City Council will give consideration to this proposal in the near future. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Planned Development Agreement was signed on January 21, 1977 for a fifteen -year period. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS MENTIONED Meritor Development Corporation has or will be proposing developments of a single-family and townhouse nature. The preponderance of proposed development will be single-family residential development. VI. PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS Parks dedication has proceeded in a timely and reasonable fashion with the Meritor Development Corporation. Park dedication, however, in that area labeled "Civic Center," has not been agreed upon to date. �---!may..:-� ._ l• FISH LANE I 1/) . 3 / • i'�/"'i II hfediuln,_Ucnsity, ' Cfvla Centel I SLAGS �J/ 1 r + lligh'"Density ), , 1 ,J Residential '11,7-7--\16 .4 ac. 140 Comrneccial- 16.0ac. �. RJD cm 0 0 m • \ 10:5 ac \`` --- 42 du.` c QLACKIIAWK PARK INC, (NORTH) EA( 50r P. U 1 w w w,-�. 1,81;. Man* • Lu.eige►, lu. BLACKHAWK PARK INC, (SOUTH) A . E A G A N 5 C ® .� to U ®® ■ 1 iM 1M W M Sults MmHg dnaiitu. lec Nl►, p7$ 37 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: OWNER/DEVELOPER: LOCATION: DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: EXPIRATION DATE: TERM OF P.D.: DATE REVIEWED: PREPARED BY: I. LAND USES BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, EARL MELBRIDGE W 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECT 16 & PART OF SECT 17 DECEMBER 28, 1981 1996 15 YEARS MARCH 4, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACRES DWELLING UNITS (DU) Single Fem., Duplex (R-1, R-2) Townhouse (R-3) TOTAL Limited Business - Site D - Site E TOTAL 44.9 32.9 77.8 18 15 33 Park (PK) 10.2 TOTAL ACREAGE 121 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE PAST REVIEW 163 230 393 Ashbury Road was completed to the southeast and the Yankee Doodle Road reconstruction was finished. With these now open,—along-with traffic demand strategies being used by Blue Cross, traffic conditions are currently manageable. The approximately 10 acre park was dedicated and now is being developed by the Eagan Parks Department. This includes a warming house/restroom building, a neighborhood softball field, walkways, tennis courts and ice rinks. The phasing of the development is proposed as follows: 1) 44.9 acres 2) 18 acres 3) 32.9 acres 4) 15 acres - 163 dwelling units Site D - limited business - 230 dwelling units Site E - limited business (1985-1990) (1985-1990) (1985-1990) III. PROPOSED CHANGES At this time, staff knows of no proposed changes within the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Planned Development. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Planned Development Agreement was entered into on December 28, 1981. This agreement is for a 15 year period so long as Eagan grants timely approval of each phase of development. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS With the improvements to the roads in the area, the severe traffic problems of the past are now being minimized. There are no other problems at this time. NOTES: • or. y 7 , sT I A 2 / / , / . 1 - , 1 / L 1/ 'it, " • • //•• // I,/ • 1. • PD • • 44,7 •••-•71 r• -n .71 I A " ( .7.. " " • • r L4111 . •—y..-1--• 1.'"•(-7‘1 Fr77 1 C..: INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM DENSITY 6-12 units/acre LIMITED BUSINESS PARK' Site Area 10.211 acres Early Dedication Development Compl a Ct SITE D LIMITED Bi,JSINESQ$' Site Arj 16 kddes I d ProposetMa . Bldg. 1751000 sq.ft (Include,;a-I 5 40re Sertllpd Center) U Propos Dev 4mentLy91 -1997 .03 ❑ a Q e3 X SITE C LIMITED BUSINESS Site Area 15.4 acres Proposed Max. Bldg. 190,000 sq.ft. SITE B LIMITED BUSINESS Site Area 24.9 acres Proposed Max. Bldg. 370,000 sq {, Development Complete SITE// LIMITED BUSw ESS S14Area 15.4 acres proposed Max. Bldg. 190,000 sq.ft. �—e0earn- Iv7 11 1 L5 ri n Cl LOW DENSITY 0-3 units/acre 0 Proposed Trails SITE E LIMITED BUSINES s Ite Area 15 acres Prop n ed Max. Bldg. 140,000 sq.ft. Proposed Development 1992-1997, LOW DENSITY 0-3 units/acre C}C1C]q Q❑ OCA rp OC3 C7nq GIO 6onaltrAyce O RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY Site Area 46.65 acres 163 units Proposed Development 1990-1995 BCBSM n 5 8' I` r _L PUBLIC WORKS 11 n _ _—CoaclmanAoad 1L1 MEDIUM DENSITY 3-6 units/acre CI tJ'C]C7 C]QQcJ G;] HIGH DENSITY t C 12 or greater units/acre MEDI ' • TY Site Ar049 res 230 units—� �Pro..sed 6[�e`�]ely Hent 1992-1997 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS Outline of Planned bevelopenent Site 0 0!Di173 CP/315//' ' Q, 61 ❑ °° O / e�4}I9 � CI ( `Proposed Land Use eo .arks, WetlandsE&R�rculation cl 9 ;� a 1 Street Access and PARK Planned Development Concept Plan November 1980 Revised: June 1981 February 1988 March 1988 1..1.11111.1.6111.1 0 100 200 400 800 1000 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MINNESOTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PROJECTION DATA Dwelling RESIDENTIAL Acres Units Density Low Density 46.65 163 3.49 Medium Density 32.9 230 6.99 Total 79.55 393 4.94 Projected Projected Max. LIMITED BUSINESS Acres Population Bldg. (Sa. Ft.) Site D 18 650 175,000 Site E 15 500 140,000 Total 33 1,150 315,000 PARK (Completed) Acres Total Acres Developed 10.25 Total Acres to be Developed 112.55 Total 122.8 Exhibit G Density Chart Revised Feb.1988 Mar.1988 o ( 4c , VK e 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGAN 40 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (75-3) OWNER/DEVELOPER: DAN DOLAN LOCATION: NE 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28 DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: NOVEMBER 5, 1975 EXPIRATION DATE: 1985 TERM OF P.D.: 10 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: MARCH 4, 1988 PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I. LAND USES Parcel Acres Land Use Dwelling Units A 2.2 R-3 16 B 19.2 R-4 230 C 13.0 11-3 92 R.O.W. 5.2 Total 39.6 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW On May 6, 1986, the City Council approved one three-year extension of the P.D. agreement from the date of the expiration of the ten-year P.D. This three-year extension is in effect until November 5, 1988. The Deerfield Addition received preliminary plat approval on May 21, 1986 for 322 apartment units on approximately 37.8 acres but has not received final plat approval. III. PROPOSED CHANGES There have been no other changes submitted to staff at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT As mentioned earlier, the P.D. agreement was extended for three years to run until 1988. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS The developer has had some concern regarding parcel A (2.2 acres) and its assessments. These differences are currently being worked out. ..... BLACKHAWK PARK PK • ' • PATRIeK EAGAt: R - N IFF •2nd A / YosiAnAI.AW rAiPti•147 t • -=___ i .�•..L. . - -,-• rr- . - ROAD y• -.' w • • :PARCEL— 2 • • ,:1)):))1\ ("). I / i 43 „,...1...:(,_••_,..--. _� \ i'r-�,-•-•--%, ,'yam_' `' _ ,--1, k°`. 1 ,,t rte`', `1 t TO 902 c !1 �\ --:-• - •.I1%; /^=r. •,.` r �/ rl r��'• y,, •••41•41 • (Z) DENOTES PO TEN TIAL RESICEN TIA: BUIL DING AREA Ca - aa 30 Parcel B 19.2 Acres Land use R-4 230 Dwelling Units pito pec d .4(CCd33 Parcel C 13 acres ± Land use R-3 92 Dwelling Units SIMMLIEMIGONIMIMMIIMIla OMNI 1987/88 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P.D.: EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH (COMPRI HOTEL) EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND (RESIDENCE INN) OWNER/DEVELOPER: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: EXPIRATION DATE: TERM OF P.D.: DATE REVIEWED: PREPARED BY: I. LAND USES Site Office Park 2nd Office Park 4th Lemay Lake 2nd OFFICE PARK 2ND OFFICE PARK 4TH LEMAY LAKE 2ND OFFICE PARK 2ND OFFICE PARK 4TH LEMAY LAKE 2ND 1990 1991 1991 OFFICE PARK 2ND OFFICE PARK 4TH LEMAY LAKE 2ND MARCH 4, 1988 - NW 1/4 OF SECT 3 - NW 1/4 OF SECT 3 - NW 1/4 OF SECT 10 - MARCH 19, 1985 - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 - MAY 6, 1986 - 5 YEARS - 5 YEARS - 5 YEARS PLANNING DEPARTMENT Acres 28.7 5.07 4.36 Land Uses General office uses Hotel & restaurant Residence Inn II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE LAST REVIEW The Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition received final plat approval in June 1986. One office building is now complete and approximately 40% leased. A second office building has been approved, but has not been built. The Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition received final plat approval in September 1986. The Compri Hotel is under construction with completion expected in the fall of 1987. The Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition received final plat approval in July 1986. The Residence Inn is under construction with completion expected in the fall of 1988. III. PROPOSED CHANGES No changes have been proposed in any of the Planned Developments at this time. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Office Park 2nd P.D. Agreement was signed March 19, 1985 for a 5 - year term. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS Growth and development has been slower than expected in these planned developments. New buildings within these P.D.s are expected to be proposed as market conditions deem it necessary. NOTES: J`O`EI 1181HX3 PLOT KMaB R�AD 13r4 CP El r M 0 rnm VILAS LANE 43EA4, LAW 0 PILOT KNOB ROAD • -4" re 0 a re z /0.1^,rie Am• sularog,,J —BURNSIDE AVENUE 11 (MCA VlIVAll IwOii 1 A 443c 3 rdOIX avtla • 1 �' 211•101‘ r.••••■ .�..« . 011111116•11•11 a.rw Lagarae.esa•.•.re•+• • •wase••s,11•.••••w•w.w•.•• • MSisinnras. ••mMain •••Pune • •.r•••••••J.1•� AMPOSIMbIlana EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION 1310H IadINOC "s, _