04/29/2003 - City Council Special~ -fX.,.-;„,,,
~`
AGENDA
JOINT SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SHOP
ADVISORY PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSIONS
TUESDAY
APRIL 29, 2003
6:00 P.M.
EAGAN CITY HALL
COMMUNITY ROOM
I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION
II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
III. JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COL`NCIL AND ADVISOR'
PLANNING COMMISSION
IV. CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION WITH THE
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - 7:00 P.M.
~'. JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
s. ~~~
city of eagan
MEMO
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITI' COUIVCILMEMBERS
CHAIRPERSON HUUSKO AND MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORI'
PLAI\'1~TING COMMISSION
CHAIRPERSON ASHFELD AND MEMBERS OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 25, 2003
SLBJECT: JOINT SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP / ADVISORI' PLA?STiING
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS /APRIL 29, 2003
The City Council has scheduled a Joint Workshop on Tuesday. April 29 for the purpose of
meeting with each of your Advisor}' Commissions to discuss goals. work program and overall
objectives on hove the Commission and City Council can better serve each other. Enclosed on
page ~ is a cop}- of the letter that «-as sent to Advison~ Commission Members April 11.2003
from the City Administrator. The Advisor}- Planning Commission is scheduled to meet ~-ith the
Cit}- Council at 6:00 p.m.. while the Economic Development Commission will meet with the
Council following the joint discussion on Cedar Grove Redevelopment. We would like the
Economic Development Commission to arrive at approximatel}- 7:00 p.m. which is the time the
Council scheduled for both the APC and EDC to meet with the City Council to discuss the Cedar
Grove Rede~~elopment.
To provide a history and support information to help you prepare for our general discussion on
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment. a memo is attached on pages ~ through ~ for your
revie~~.
Between EDC's February & March meetings, they created three subcommittees, assigned
members, and were directed to meet as individual groups to define one or two goals for the year
and report back for action by the entire commission. Enclosed on page ~ is a copy of these
assignments.
VVe look forward to seeing everyone on Tuesday evening. For those Wild fans, we will make
sure there are a couple of breaks to check in on the action!
/s' Thomas LThomas L. Hedges
Cit`- Administrator
city of eaq~n
1~AT ,~~~~.~,
April l ] . ?00
1latur
rECC~ cARLSO~: Dear .4d~~ison Commission Members
c•~~nEE F11=L~~ In an effort to continue communlcdtions ~~ ith the Ads isor~ Commissions, the Ea_an City
~nKF ~L-~~~ lr~ Council has requested that a joint meeting be held ~~ ith the Cite Council and the membzrs
~.1>=c T1LLE~ of the Ad~~isor~ Planning Commission (APC) and Economic De~~elopment Commissiol;
(EDC) on Tuesda~~. April 29.
Crnmci! \ir'~bern
It is the Council's intention to dig ide the meeting into three segments. The folio~~ in~_ is
T1-~fo~.:a.~ H~r~c,>=~ the proposed schedule to sere e as a Quideline for the e~ enin~c of .4pri] ?9 (times n:a~ ~ ark
due to discussion t:
6- i p.m.-The Cite Council ~t ill meet ~t ith the membzrs of the .4PC to discuss the
commissions initiatives.
Municipal Centrr
7-8 p.m.-The Cite Council ~~ ill meet ~~~ith membzrs of both the .4PC and EDC to
"'~ P``°` ~'~°~ r.°'`" dialo_ue about the Cedar Grog e Rede~ elopment Area.
rr,~, ,r ~,;,, ;,-; ;~,,,~, 8-9 p.m.-The Cite Council ~~ ill meet ~~ ith the members of the EDC to discuss th;
commissions initiati~ es.
Fem. c~, c-; ;~~;=
T~'~ ~~` ~ ~;- >- The April ~'9 meeting is an opportunity for the Cite Council to dialogue ~', ith both the
EDC and .CPC. as separate commissions, and it is also ~', ill alloy'` the Council to meet
~~ ith both commissions at the same time to specifically discuss the Cedar Grog e
Maintenance Facilin: .~
Rede~~elopment Area. t'`'hen arri~ ing on the 29 ,please join the City Council in the
3~0; coachman r.:~.~ Community Room on the second floor of Cite Hall.
Eagan. '`1\ ~j;:_
Phone: G>l.G'S.~300 The Council is eery much looking font•ard to meetine v~•ith each of the Commissions. Ii
you hay e an~~ questions about the meeting. or are unable to attend, please contact Senior
Fax: GS:.G'S ;3G0 planner Ridley at 6?~-~6~0.
Tn~ Gs, Asa s<,~
Sincerer,
N'wx. ci tvofeagan. com
Thomas L. Hedges
Cite Administrator
THE LO'`E OAK TREE
The «•mbol of srrene;h
and erow;l; ~.n our
communin
a
(/^V 1~
I ~
~..'~
l ~'ti
~~~ City of Eagan
1~1 E'~1 O
TO: HONOR4BLE MAYOR A:'SD CITE' COL''\CIL
CHAIRPERS01 HtiLSKO A.'~'D >\1El~1BERS OF THE ADS"ISOR~'
PLA.NNI'SG CO1~111ISSI0\
CH AIRPERSO'\ ASHFELD A.'SD 1\1E'11BERS OF THE ECON0111C
DEVEI_OP1~1E?ST CO1~1~1ISS101
FR011: CITY AD~1I\ISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 25, 2003
SUBJECT: CED:~R GROVE REDE~-ELOP'\1E1T IIITIATI~-E
The following is intended to provide a brief snapshot of the history that has lead to the
City's initiative to rede~~elop the Cedar Grove area. This memo will pro~~ide 1.) A very beef
history of events that have taken place o~~er the past t«~o decades leading to the need for
redevelopment; 2.) Redevelopment activit}~ and current status; and 3.) The purpose of our
upcoming meeting on April 29.
HISTORI'
The transforn~ation of the Cedarvale Shopping Center area as a communit}~ retail purpose
changed in 1981 when the rn•o major access areas ~~ere eliminated to the Cedarvale
Shopping Center. This was due to the redesign and opening of the Cedar Avenue Free~~ av
and Trui~l: Highway 13 improvement. A con-u~nittee was fornied in October 1981 entitled
"Cedarvale Transportation Committee" to stud}' alternatives that would improve the
accessibility of vehicular trips to the Cedarl•ale Shopping Center area. The committee ~~~as
quite active, and there ~e~ere many proposals reviewed «~ith MnDOT that looked at
transportation designs that would restore direct access to the Cedarvale shopping area. After
months of meetings ~~•ith MnDOT and some minor improvements to Trunl: Highway I3 and
the Silver Bell Road intersection, the study found there «~ere no feasible improvements to
assist the area. There was an effort to create apark-and-ride site in late 1982 to bring more
traffic into the Cedarvale area.
The Cedarvale area experienced a transformation from retail to destination use during the
remainder of the 1980's and early 1990's. In late 1991, there was interest being expressed
by the Business O~~~ners Association for the Cedarvale business area that the City participate
in a retail study to address revitalization for the Cedarvale business area. The City retained
the McComb Group for the study. It was found by McComb that the future of Cedarvale,
due to a number of reasons, would take on a different character of destination use. A small
~~orking group of business leaders began calling themselves the Cedarvale ~~'orking Group.
This group identified some short-term and long-term objectives that are outlined in a memo
from Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein dated May 11, 1992, which is attached
on pages ~ through ~. This was the start of the City and the Cedarvale area business
o~~~ner's partnership to address both short-term and loner terns activities that could enhance
the area.
There mere efforts made on various occasions, the first in December 1993, identified as
Project 656, to approve Cedarvale area access and then again in 1998. These projects ~~~ere
not given approval by the City Council and did not proceed until Project 800 «•as approved
in 2001.
In early 1991, several concepts were discussed and,or suggested. That standard of
comparison most often mentioned was Cedarvale at its highest point, during the 1970's,
prior to the relocation of Cedar Avenue and the development of competitive shopping
centers. The business group also discussed a possible combination of neighborhood and
destination uses. This «•ould build on the current experience and attempt to capitalize on
an entertainment-recreation theme. Lastly, another approach mentioned was the
relationship between Cedarvale and the Mall of America. Being only three miles awa}~
from the largest mall in the country, Cedarvale ~~~as the first site zoned for retail south of
Mall of America. With increased signage and improved access, the group discussed the
possibility of Cedan•ale becoming the "place to stop on the ~~•ay to or home from the
ma]l". The group figured Cedarvale could be similar to the experience of Centennial
Lake. the Galleria and Southto~~•n in relation to Southdale.
In order to better assess the needs of Cedarvale as perceived by business opt Hers and
residents in the Cedarvale area, a short sure ey was developed for them. According to the
sur` e}~, the three highest priorities ~~~ere perceived to be: road access and circulation.
design theme, and visibilit~~ signage. The type of character as percei~ ed by the residents
and business owners that ~~~ould contribute to the successful revitalization of Cedan•ale
~~ ere: fitness recreation, entertainment, service, and neighborhood retail.
During 199, the City Council agreed through the efforts of the Cedan•ale Business
Vl'orkin~ Group to create a Special Service District that «•as intended to benefit all retail
properties ~~~hich were affected by the relocation of the intersection of Cedar Avenue and
Highway 13. With increased signage, and visibility by trimming trees and plants, the
businesses of Cedarvale benefited.
Throughout 1998 the City Council and the Economic Development Commission worked
on a proposal for professional services to study the Cedarvale area to determine market
support for land use types, appropriate land uses, implement strategies, and establish a
positive community identity that took advantage of area's access (MSP airport, MOA,
Minnesota River Valley, etc).
On September 9, 1998 the City Council proposed the study which focused on two "sub-
areas" of Cedarvale: 1) the southeast quadrant of the TH 13!TH 77 interchange including
Cedan•ale Mall and 2) the northeast quadrant of the TH 13iTH 77 interchange. Their
goal was to create a viable, mixed land use area that took advantage of the area's innate
4
high~ti-ay visibility and accessibility yet would maintain compatible land use relationships
with surrounding uses.
After the proposal. a task force was formed in February 1999 from volunteers called the
Cedar Avenue and High~~-ay 13 Redevelopment Study Task Force that was chaired by
Margaret Schreiner. They first met on March 2, 1999 and helped guide the efforts of Cit}~
staff and consultants, while acting as representatives of the area and the City as a whole.
The fifteen member task force was made up of area residents, business owners, and city
advisor}' commission representatives appointed by the City Council.
Up until the end of 1999, the task force identi ied and deliberated on several prominent
issues of redevelopment of the Cedar Grove area, namely: architectural standards,
communications, light rail transit, parking structures, relocation, traffic, and access. The
task force then submitted to the City Council redevelopment recommendations for their
reviet~-.
The task force's efforts resulted in a report titled "Village Plaza, A Rede~-elopment
Concept for the Cedar'13 Area" prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc., which ~~-as
adopted by the City Council in 2000. The Village Plaza plan involved six phases
including: identification, concept development, concept refinement, developer selection.
development agreement, and construction.
REDEVELOP'~IE1T .4CTIVIT~" .4ND CtRREtiT STaTL'S
During 2001 several acti~~ities in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area helped the
project take shape. In February of that year, the City Council adopted the final
redevelopment area boundaries (See map attached on page a~) and conceptually
planned for the various districts of the redevelopment area. Property in the Cedar Grove
area was inspected both inside and out to deterniine eligibility for inclusion in a Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) District, and infornlation packets ~~~ere mailed to interested
developers. The Cedar Grove Redevelopment TIF District ~~•as certified by Dakota
Count} on December 31, 2002.
As of April 2003, five de~-elopers are involved with specific areas of the district. Please
refer to the status matrix and corresponding map attached on page ~ through ~.
Cedar Grove Access Modifications-Street Intersection Reconfiguration
Beginning with the approval of Project 800 in February of 2001, the City Council
initiated the major infrastructure improvements necessary to improve access to the Cedar
Grove redevelopment area. The City Council approved Project 800R in April of 2002
«~hich adjusted the scope, schedule, cost estimates, and associated special assessments
included in Project 800. Project 800R improvements are consistent with the Village
Plaza Redevelopment Stud}' and are consistent «°ith the Traffic Study for Proposed
Redevelopment of the Cedarvale area. The project realigned and expanded the
intersection of Silver Bell Road, Cedan~ale Boulevard, and Beau D Rue (now Cedar
~~
Grove Park«•ay) creating afour-legged intersection approximate)}~ 400 feet south of the
intersection of Silver Bell Road and TH 13 with a traffic signal installed at the ne«~ four-
legged intersection. The project also expanded capacity at the intersection of Sil~•er Bell
Road and TH 13 by adding numerous turning lanes and by making other modifications,
some of which are included under Project 880. Project 866 provides for streetscaping
and entry monument signs within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area.
The City Council in December of 2001 approved Project 759R which provided for
rehabilitation of Cedar Grove Park~yay, installation of a center median and pedestrian
trail, and decorative street and pedestrian lighting. The Council subsequently approved
the burying of the overhead utility lines.
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area - AUAR
Due to the scale and scope of the project, an environmental reyie~~• was necessary. Due
to the anticipated longevity of the rede~~elopment effort for the 250 acre Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Area, the City caused an Alternative Urban Area~~~ide Revie«• (AUAR1
to be completed. The AUAR substitutes for preparation of an Environmental Assessment
~'l'orksheet (EAVI') or Envirormiental Impact Statement (EIS).
The AUAR includes a Mitigation Plan that identifies measures to betaken to
ayoid,minimize,'mitigate em~ironmental impacts from a "~yorst case" de~•elopment
scenario.
The AUAR determined that impacts related to traffic, surface water, ecologically
sensitive resources, and potential environmental hazards could result from proposed
development; however, traffic .vas the primary mitigation issue. The transportation
system in the area has limited capacity and the AUAR Mitigation Plan provided a Trip
Budget that allocates vehicle trips that, collectively. ~~•ill not cause the area's
transportation system to functionally break do~t•n. This budget assigns maximum Al'~~1
and PM peak-hour trip generation broken do~yn into a "~yorst case" and "reduced
development" scenario for each of the Cedar Grove sub-areas.
Design Standards/Comprehensive Guide P1an,Rezonin~
In the summer of 2002, the City Council directed the creation of a ne~~ zoning district,
including design standards, specifically for the redevelopment area. Simultaneously,
staff was preparing a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to define the Cedar Grove
Special Area.
The City Council amended the City Code to add the Cedar Grove (Zoning) District
(CGD) in December of 2002. The Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for this area
was approved for implementation by the Metropolitan Council on April 23, 2003 and is
planned to be implemented by City Council action on May 6, 2003. The rezoning of the
redevelopment area to CGD is scheduled for Public Hearing on May 27`'' and will be
before the City Council in June.
(O
APR1L 29 >\1EETING PURPOSE
The purpose of the meeting on April 29 is three-fold. First, the Cite Council would like to
meet «~ith the APC from 6-7 PM to discuss the Commission's current projects, and
provide an open forum for discussion bet~~•een the Council and Commission.
Second, after meeting ~~~ith the :APC, the City Council would then like to dialogue and
brainstorn~ ~~~ith both the APC and the EDC regarding the Cedar Grove Redevelopment
Area. Recognizing that ~~•e have ne~~• Councilmembers and Commissioners that have not
been involved in the Cedar Grove redevelopment process to date, the purpose of the
discussion is to educate the Councilmembers and Commissioners on the history and
current status of the Redevelopment Area. Jim Prosser, of Ehlers and Associates, «•ill be
present to facilitate the evening's discussion and offer his knowledge of Cedar Grove. as
he has been one of the primary contacts for developers inquiring about the area. Lastl~•,
b}' com ersing about the current and future plans of Cedar Grove, the City Council ~t~ill
have the opportunity to receive valuable input from both commissions to assist the City
Council ~~ ith future public policy discussions and decisions regarding the Cedar Gro~•e
Rede~ elopment .Area.
Upon completion of the Cedar Grove discussions, at approximately 8 P?~1, the meeting
~~il] conclude ~~•ith the third, and final component, «~hich is the Citv Council having an
open dialogue with the EDC to discuss the Commission's initiatives and Goals for the
year.
Cite staff is ~•ery much looking fon~~ard to the opportunit}• to meet ~i ith the City Council
and Ads isor~• Commissioners on the ?9'}', and as al~~~ays, greatl}~ appreciates the time that
everyone is generously ~ olunteering.
1u~
City Administrator
Cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Administrative Sen~ices
Mike Ridley, Senior Planner
Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works
Dianne Lord, Assistant to the City Administrator
l
MEMO TO: COMMIINITY D84ELOPMENT DIRECTOR AIINICLB
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: MAY il, 1992
SOBJECT: C$DAROAZ.B AREA IMPROQEMENT PROGRAI{
In follow-up to our meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 1992, the purpose of
this memo is to outline the items we identified for short term
activities and responsible parties in each case.
Short Term - Progress is 1992:
1. Trim and Remove Weeds and Trees--The Cedarvale merchants will
be identifying the properties they believe to be unsightly
and, from this list, the City will inventory those properties
and identify the responsible parties in each case. Cedarvale
merchants will also indicate whether they want trees in those
areas completely removed or trimmed and thinned.
2. Mowing and Maintenance Plan--Cedarvale merchants will also
identify those properties which they would like to see mowed
and maintained on a more regular basis. Together with the
inventory above, the City will identify responsible parties in
each of those cases. Depending upon the amount of public or
dilapidated property, the City and merchants will work
together to prepare a mowing and maintenance plan. If the
merchants wish to undertake that maintenance on their own,
they may do so, if they wish the City to undertake it, a
funding source will have to be identified in that regard.
3. New Cedarvale Landscape Plan and Tree Replacement Program--
Upper Midwest Management will prepare a revised landscape plan
including the removal of some of the mature evergreens which
are currently diminishing visibility for the site. In
addition, it is anticipated that they will also implement a
landscape replacement program such that the overall appearance
of the property is enhanced while visibility is increased.
City staff would be available to review and work with
Cedarvale and their landscape architect in this regard.
4. Overall Sign Plan--The Cedarvale merchants will prepare a
conceptual sign plan identifying both necessary and desirable
signage to be located in the greater Cedarvale area. This
signage may include but not be limited to pylon signage at the
intersection of Highway 13 and Cedar Avenue, monument signage
at major entrances to the area, combined signage requirements
for multiple properties, off-site signage requests as
appropriate and other ideas as may be determined. Following
preparation of the plan, City staff will work with the
Cedarvale merchants determining specific sites for such
signage on private or public property.
O
CEDARVALE PROGRAM
MAY 11, 1992
PAGE TWO
5. Feasibility Report on Silver Bell Intersection Improvements--
The Community Development Department will identify a
preliminary feasibility study cost and coordinate potential
requests and/or guarantees with the Cedarvale merchants to
implement that study in anticipation of the preparation of
detail plans and specifications for the improvement. It was
suggested that SEH do this work since they had done the
preliminary work as well.
6. Study Excess Right-of-Way and Underutilized Properties--The
Community Development Department will inventory and identify
alternative approaches to the excess right-of-way on either
side of Cedarvale Boulevard and in the Silver Bell Road area.
On a parallel track, staff will also review the relationship
of the excess right-of-way to the currently underutilized
properties in the area. The purpose of the study would be to
reduce the amount of unnecessary public right-of-way and
return as much as possible to the public tax rolls in the
future.
7. Identify Buildings to be Demolished or Improved--The Cedarvale
merchants will identify which buildings they believe should be
demolished and which ones are salvageable but need to be
improved. In the context of the overall strategy for the
area, staff will incorporate these recommendations in either
demolition or tax increment improvement plans.
8. Tax Increment Feasibility Analysis--The City will analyze the
feasibility of the creation of a tax increment financing
district or districts in the Cedarvale area to assist in the
conversion of certain properties and the financing of certain
improvements for the benefit of the overall area.
9. Special Service District--City staff will also analyze the
potential applicability of a special service district to
spread costs of specialized services such as additional
maintenance or amenities over the entire Cedarvale area.
10. Deteriorated Parking and Business Lighting--The Cedarvale
merchants will address means of improving deteriorated parking
and business lighting in the area. An effort will be made to
unify lighting between existing businesses. After that, a
street lighting plan will be developed by the City which would
potentially follow the theme identified by the merchants for
their individual properties.
9
CEDARVA.LE PROGRAM
MAY 11, 1992
PAGE THREE
il. Slater Property Investigation--City staff and the City
Attorney's office will research the title to the Slater
property and strategize an approach to resolving that issue.
Staff will then work in concert with the Cedarvale merchants
in implementing appropriate modifications. This may also tie
into the excess right-of-way study.
12. Paint and Improve Exteriors--Cedarvale merchants will be
responsible for the painting and improvement of their own
exteriors including potential modifications to the Cedarvale
mall exterior proper. The City will work with property owners
of vacant buildings to improve their appearances as well.
13. Feasibility Study of Park and Ride Location--The Community
Development Department is currently monitoring efforts by the
Minnesota Valley Transit Authority to study the feasibility of
the relocation of a park and ride facility. This will be
coordinated with the excess right-of-way study and the
underutilized property study to optimize the reuse of the
area.
14. Begin Discussions Regarding the Future Plans of the Home Juice
Property--Following completion of the feasibility study on the
road design at the Silver Bell intersection, staff will
approach the property owners of the Home Juice property to
determine whether or not they are anticipating changes in the
use of their property in light of the roadway improvements.
Depending upon their future plans, their property could be
combined with the Country Club property and Rax property to
form a larger overall entrance which could be an anchor for
drawing traffic into the Cedarvale area.
15. Joint Merchandising--Cedarvale property owners will be
responsible for pursuing targeted users for their properties
as outlined in the McComb report. The Cedarvale property
owners and merchants should also request that the McComb
report become a part of the overall City economic development
master plan for the specific revitalization of the overall
Cedarvale area. That request would be channeled through the
Economic Development Commission and forwarded to the City
Council.
16. Joint Marketing--The Cedarvale Merchants and Property Owners
Association would be directly responsible for a joint
marketing approach which would include but not be limited to
the overall sign plan for the area.
10
CEDARVALE PROGRAM
MAY 11, 1992
PAGE FOUR
Long Tyra - Progress in Two to Thr~• Years:
1. Silver Bell Road Improvements--Based upon the feasibility
report, a request could be received of the Cedarvale merchants
to implement the Silver Bell intersection improvements. It
would be necessary to identify appropriate funding sources and
cost participation agreements to the extent possible prior to
implementation of the improvement.
2. Rahn Road Right-In Connection--Staff will again work with SEH
to develop a strategy regarding MnDOT and the legislature to
attempt to address the Rahn Road connection. The first step
in this strategy would be to identify the hard costs and
realities associated with the design modifications for the
right-in and highway ramp modifications. Depending upon the
level of cost, a strategy will be developed to identify cost
participation and funding requirements in this regard.
3. Entrance and Monument Signage--As a part of the overall sign
plan, Cedarvale merchants should identify their perceptions of
appropriate placement and design of monument Signage at the
major entrances to the site. It would be anticipated that
these would be Silver Bell Road and Rahn Road. For obvious
reasons, such Signage would not be installed until such time
as improvements are complete.
4. Demolish Vacant Buildings and Consolidate Appropriate
Properties--Following the TIF analysis, a determination will
be made whether or not to implement a TIF district. If not,
efforts will be made to encourage the demolition of brick
buildings independent of the TIF project. If a TIF district
were approved, the demolition of vacant buildings and
consolidation of properties would be undertaken in
coordination with that district.
Please let me know if I have left anything out. We should identify
some time frames and specific responsible parties for each of these
tasks. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Ass taut to the City Administrator
c: Project Planner Eggers
Lisa Wendt, Upper Midwest Management
Hugh Fitzgerald, Dakota County State Bank
JDH/j eh
~~~
f _i-:` ~,
,~ ~ ~~~
•e~e
a
~~ ~~' ~c; ~ r~ ~' ~;., ~ ~ .'~',:.
~f~~~• ~`
.~ I• °is ~ .o ire • ~~4"'(' ,
T '~ y
O
s ~ ~ q~ I ~ ~ lS "' ~r~' ~P~ ra ~ L
,\
~ ~ ,• e 7
~ i
~ ~~~r A~ /! i' ~~
~ , ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ i~ ~1 ~
~ ioe~ vpCO G
G QQ •'~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~' ~ 'O"62°c'Y e O
~' .V OJ ~ :~~o~feF~c
~~r--- ~ ~^-J'~ ~ ~~ a a' p'~t ~ ooem~o ~ ~
~ ~ . j c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ P ~ '~ceo ~ r Ol
~ ~ ~
~~ \ ~
,O
/~\ ~
~ ~ ,\
~'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~'~
. f ~ ~~~
~~~ ~6 ~~~@ ~ 6
Fe --
~~~C
'O e
\e ~i 2
~ a
~~ o~
~:, ,;~ L
~ s ~ ~~ _ Q
~ -~~=
~ ~
~ I
i1
~~ i ~~
/ ~ i~ ~~Zt
~.
:~ ~~~ ,
~ \\ ,
Ged°t ~ '~` ~~~ -- ~~:~~
~, ~ ~ .
~~~ ~~ .
`~' ~ \~~
a
ii
`~
L
v
d
V
C
Q
V
L-
V
Gz:
~.
O
Z
G=:
Y~
.r._~
W
Y~
rQ
W
l
r~
`/
M
C
N
N
N
~_
~L
Z:.
I3 ~ I
I•` v ~
v, ~
Z f >, U
_
G .
I
i ~~
• J V v
'
3 1
~ v U
~ _
'~
V
~ ~
ft) L V U
'i y /:
:L > •
iU > '~
v, . v, Z
`n - V
:>
~ 'l ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ; ~ - ^L ~ V
u r
.' J '~ T ~ f ._ ~ ~
~ ""' ~ J Y U V r
~ U i '~
^ = _
l U _ ~
i
^
V
F ~ ~ U ~- V ~ • ~
=~
U ~
>>
_ V
~ 1
~ ~ GC F ~ ^ ~ !/.' L J r ~ _ ,
U ~ C L Cr ~ ~ ~ ` ~ / U L .j L I
'~' U `r C '~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ C ~ ~' C ~
_ .
'7
~ f L
r v
C'iL ~ ~ __
~ C
s ... ..; X
~ J ~ IJ
-^
~ . _ ,
~ _ v ^
U~ L~ v r a u r > ~
:~ V
>, C 3< C
~ ~ ~ u
c; V < J J
o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~= G v
G
~
~ J :J ~
. ~ I J > ~
~ > -
=~ 'J
J
i
~ V G
~
~- G ~ = ~
^ r. G ^ _
~ .. :~
J
r. `
v ~ _ V L ;J
~.
r '. C .. C. U
.. r
p
_ =~
~ CL
...
ll J I '
?rl i ~ L
~ 3
V I _ ~~ ~-~< t
C ~
I V
E
~~
~-
~
C
L ~,
^
c:J E eC _
~ t^
i C L +V7 ~ ~ ,!
(~ Q L ~
y a" ' U ~
~ ~ ~ N '-' ~
i C e0
~~- ~"' `~
U
U ea o y v
~
~
N v;
.. V P
1
+- U
+r
C
v
'
~
c ~
ci ~
~
~`
•~
^
Q ~ ~ fV G rJ
i
V >i ~ ~ r
G -'" ~
~ i
' ~ ~ U ~
~
~
^ = - 3
~ ~ ~ r
~
r
` ~ ~ >
i L
V
4
Q
V
/~/~
vJ
V
W
a
2
Q
W
`~
``r
1"~
U
13
i~ ~ Y
J U
~ 3
J
G '
'~, ',
I
I f
lY
G
i
t >, _
Y
~
/
~ ~L
•_
r
3
3 r
._
~_
~~ .L
ro
cJ ~ L r ^ ~ .L _ > I .^ .
J ._ ... i
I
s ~ G ~ ~ ca ~ ~ I
_
v ~ ~ x 3 u = C C L
~ c . t r ^ =
U eC
V V
r
'J
- O
r
r
I
!
~ ~ C.
J
G
~ ..+
U ~ ~~ ~ J Y ~ J
/.
~ ^ ^
,
• ~.+
r
L
~
~ j ~ > -
~
J ~ T^ C L
.
ti i 3 T
=. L J
=~
~
v
X
I ^ . .-
~ r C U J~ V Z / ~
J
, m ~ v ~ _
J
~
~' t L r - L v 17 CJ P
J f ... L f J ~ J
: ~ ,
~ _
^ _ .
r. _ V 0.
L ~ CJ ~ -I
= > '- ~! G G - l
_ i y .
~ L - -
-
3
v ~ ~
c S+
~ .:~ ~ ~
c_-
- >
-
u
_
~,_ G 1, ~ _ .J t ;J~.- _ .- U .... -
~~
I ~ J
~ > L f C > ^. ~
` I '~ J L J
;,zl ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~fs ~, I ::_f
~ r:; :;,
' c r y', 3-f~,
~.
v ~ ^
J ~
J
v I ,
I
J V
c o`D o ~ 3 v" ~ ~ ~, _ ~ _
~ ~ ~
~ 3
`
t- 3 .c ~
`
~ O N
N G N G ~
-- e ~''
~ CJ
Z O U
- 'O
I ... O O - 9 I
C V i y v'~ '~
~
V
I ~ i
i ~ ~ T ~i
I
I ~ -_ M
~'Q III` ~ L ..-L L eG L Ni Z (Z
L
~
.
J
- i
i
~.. \ ~.. I ^ ..1 V - ..{
v
Q
U
W
4
Z
Q
Q
W
O
^~^
1'~
U
l~
I
I
r
'l.
r
i r
r ~ G ~
',x = I~ p ~+ :G I
Z :/. I; L ~ ~ ~ ~
i L ~ ~ G
--
i ~ -_ I J j I
f 5 z ~
:f.
Y
L
i l
V ~ V .~
~
~ ~ ~ I'.
i r C. Y j
~
L
I ~
.Jr
;
.~ v =
_ , ^ S
`~ a
i ~
~
~ri
~ L'
~. _
~ .
'
1 _ 1 J G
r J L ^ `-
f J ~ _ i
i ~ 1 ~ L
^-
3 ~ - 3
I
~ -
~
~ ~,
V :J G J!
J ~ L
'~ ~., t :I. ~ ~. V 'l.
i
~,
v C, ~
~ .
i ~ LI ~
C
y ~~
~ C
I ~ L fJ
~
OJ ~, L ~ Y, ~
G I G ~ ~ C
,
c w
~~
~ ~ ;~ ~~
~ aGl
iiF"'
cc c;< <
I< iiz z
~ ~~ ~
~. ,
~ ~ ~ '~
C I .. `''
v ~ ~~ ~
~ ~
v
;.
_
F-
U
W
O
a
Z
Q
c~
Q
w
~-
F-
U
!~
U
'
i
+
a
~ H
_ ~ < -
'
~ ~ _ ~ i
,n
a ~
~ _ _
-
~ _ _
~ Y/ ~ ~ ~ k
_
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r
a
~~
~ O
J
a _
T
s+l~ ~
-~ - - _
y
N L
A
W '/
0 \
~~
\ ~~'=~
~~
m _y.:
'~ -
N C
L7
N
~\
\ / \.
~ V
~ ~
T - V ~ \ ).
~, \
\,vtN ~~ .~ \.
u
3 ? '_-.
e~''~v^^
?'~
`Z JT.
~~
t
M
C
O
N
C
s
c~
z
0
F
W
a. ~,
c
~: _
•~
~:
C ~
U
O
z
O
U
w
Q
0
'
«..
:r
L
~.
~ s X X
U
a
~.
a
~- ° X X
ea
0
Y~ L
~ s X X >C
~, v I
u
C
CC
0
U
~ ''
O S
L
=
i ~ ~
~ C
C ~
~
V ~
'L U
3 ~, ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~' o ~ ~ ~ ~
c ;~ ~ o ~
~ ~ ~ ~ c , ~
Qs
~ i
~ ~
~ _
c
~
~~
c ~
~
~
U~ .
~ ~
~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ c
~ a
n
~ ~ ~ ~ on an
~ ~
~ ~ ~
z ~ zz ~
~ ~~ ~
r~r~ c
3 3 ~~ ~ ~ ~~
~7