Loading...
02/10/2004 - City Council SpecialAGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY FEBRUARY 10, 2004 5:30 P.M. EAGAN CITY HALL / EAGAN ROOM I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD III. PRESENTATION RE: LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS & LONG ACRES ADDITION DRAINAGE IV. REVIEW WIRELESS BROADBAND ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Memo Special City Council Meeting February 10, 2004 III. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS & LONG ACRES ADDITION DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To provide direction to staff as appropriate regarding the relationship of the Long Acres Addition to drainage in Lebanon Hills Park or the consideration of low impact development methods for the City's development standards. FACTS: • At the January 20 Council meeting, the City Council considered the Long Acres development proposal. In a previous development review, the City Council identified concerns regarding traffic impacts related to additional development in the area. The traffic related issues and concerns were adequately addressed by an Engineering Report Prepared by SEH. • The City Council continued its consideration of the item in order to receive additional information pertaining to increased runoff resulting from development and the impact that it would have on the downstream receiving water bodies within Lebanon Hills Regional Park and along Cliff Road. The Council directed this issue to a special workshop for further discussion. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff report on pages a _ ~p /~'\ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1Li city of eagan MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADNIINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIItECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2004 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION RE: LOW IlVIPACT DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS & LONG ACRES ADDITION BACKGROUND. Manley Brothers is proposing a 30 acre single family development (Long Acres) located in the southeast corner of Eagan. The runoff form this new development will drain to the west into the existing wetland within the Gun Club properly which eventually drains across TH #3 and south Dodd Rd. into Lebanon I~iills Regional Park (I,HRP). On various occasions over the last 5 - 8 years, the drainage basins and wetlands within LHRP have filled and spilled over Cliff Rd onto private property resulting ingrowing concerns from adjacent property owners about future events. LHRP has been working on a comprehensive drainage plan to manage the rate and volume of water that enters and flows through the park. As a comprehensive watershed, approx. 50 - 58% of the total drainage area lies outside of the park boundaries incorporating portions of Eagan, Rosemount and Apple Valley. Most of the upstream drainage areas are undeveloped open space, except for the developing section of southeast Eagan (approx. south of Red Pine Lane). LHRP's comprehensive drainage plan has not yet received approval from the Muinesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for implementation. Recent position statements have indicated that special legislation is required before the County's plan can be approved and pernutted by the DNR ISSUES wth the development of the proposed Long Acres Addition, the Council has expressed concerns about the impact and effect that its related runoff will have on the existing downstream drainage problems at Cliff Rd. There has been a question as to whether some type of "I,ow Impact Development" standards should be implemented with any approvals. These two issues will be addressed as follows: a 1. Increased runoff impacts. Long Acres comprises approx. 30 acres and incorporates 3.33 acres of existing wetland with another 0.7 acres of additional ponding azeas to be added. This relates to the total LHRP watershed drainage basin of 1,400 acres (approx. 2%). The incremental increase associated with the Long Acres development that can't be handled by the added internal storage capacities is relatively insignificant in relation to the overall drainage area and volumes into and through the LHRP that have been of concern of the recent past. 2. Low Impact Development Standards. Approx. 2'/z years ago, Dakota County and their consultant (Barr Engineering) made a presentation to the City Council about the benefits of Low Impact Development (LID) standards and encouraged the City to implement those wherever possible. LID incorporates numerous wetland type depressions along the road's edge, in backyard azeas, side lot lines, etc. under the premise that, collectively, they retain more water for infiltration, evaporation and transpiration thereby minimizing the rate and volume of downstream dischazges. This was part of the County's comprehensive plan to minimi~.~ the impacts of offsite development on the Park's drainage issues they were trying to address. Due to the size of the LHRP overall watershed and the magnitude of the runoff problems in the past, it is questionable as to how much benefit would be derived from limited applications to small scale developments. OPTIONS Staff Condition #5 proposed for approval of the Long Acres development addresses the need to construct animproved/upgraded outlet from the Gun Club Pond (LP-23) across TH 3 into the LHRP's Mazsh Lake (LP-24). However, this will not address the concerns further downstream neaz Cliff Rd. This runoff from the city's entire southeast azea needs to be managed in a controlled manner all the way from the Gun Club Pond to the Holland Lake Lift Station on Cliff Road. The City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan proposes that this water flow into/through Marsh and McDonough Lakes within LHRP along the way. Due to the delays that the County has encountered with the DNR approvals for their comprehensive plan, it may be more reasonable for the City to implement the interconnection of ow drainage system in accordance with ow existing comprehensive plan which would only impact a smaller portion of LHRP (Mazsh and McDonough Lakes). If this were to proceed, this could very well provide the permanent controls adequate to address the current drainage concerns along Cliff Rd. and allow the continued development of property in southeast Eagan without further adding to these downstream drainage concerns. The scope, schedule, estimate and financing of such an improvement should best be contained within a feasibility report prepared in concert with the County's comprehensive plan to ma_ximi?.~ the opportunities of both. I can be available to discuss these issues in further detail at the Council's discretion. Enc: locations maps 3 ,' Eagan Boundary Location Map ^,,st<eat~en,e~'"e Parcel Area _~ Building Footprint ~ ~ yr` ~ ~ ® a / L "e ~ a0 ~a ~ a ~ ~3r ~~' lY ~ ~. sa~ ~ ~ ~ i~ d . ~ di ~ ~Y U ~ ~ _ _ J i _ __. _.... .__~ (.. N ~ ~ ~ ~ . 9 Ya ~ tl ~, ' ® _ . ~~ ~ ` e ~ _~ :; ~~~ i z ~ ~. ~ ~ ;~ ~ r' v ~ ~ ~ ~r ~~ r; ~ ~~ I~ ~ pp ® ~ ~ ~ ~ % > >~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ a ~ i ~l ~ ~ :;~ ..uv.e ® ~~ ~ ~D ~ 1 ) ~ t i .L ~ ~ ~~Jt ml~ 7 .~ ~ j a r ~ ~ ~ ~,: \ . ~~. t / -® a ~-, 4~ ~ a ~ ~~~~ ~ €~ r~ ~ Subject Site } q t +~; r. '. E ..:.~ ~ i~ ~ ,®s l~ __ _ ` _ __ ,.__~ ....- _. - 1 .....~. - --- ___ - ~T - _..._.__.._....._ _.._...__..._._ _. ___ _.. _ . _~ __., __ _~ ................ __- ..._: :~. }---- ~' • ~~ ~ i `; ; ;;% i ;; r - '~ ,j ;- ' ;: ;i i ' ll_ --- s ' ~:. y ~ ~,; 1000 0 1000 2000 Feel Development/Developer: Long Acres Application: Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision Case No.: 36-RZ-1409-03 and 36-PS-17-09-03 Map Prepared using ERSI AreYew 7.1. Parcel base map data provided by Dakota County Office of GIS and b current as of January 2004. N TNIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E city of eoc~an The City oT Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee that accuracy oT this information and are S Community pavdarpmant DepaAnsnt not res nsible for error or omissfons. /LIl :~. y( T- j a ~~~ ~ `a~ ~ ~ 6~ ~~® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _g ~ ~ a~ c R V r.+ ~ ~ ~ u V ~ V ~~ _~ o~ >> o j c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 R O C .~ ~~ R ~ ~ ~ o ~ ti ~. ~+ °o °o ~~ p~ pOD M ~ O N ~ 00 M .~ ~i iii .~., it ~:~.~ V 4~ '~ I C A (~ s 2 :f~,I~,I:w.fl~ I V ~ W I ~I~I,~ V ~~I~peo~ qou}~ ~o~id ~ i N ~„ ~ 00 GO -~ ~ i r T q ~ ~ 0. vb4 C~ ' r Q1 +.~ N ~- ~ r~ ~ ~~ O W W ~ J J Q 4 _ i ~1 ~~ 'mac ' ~''a Pe_ °~PoQ ~~„ Z ~ ~ V~~ Z -k ~ti~i z~a ~ o ~t ~aZ z ~ ~ 2 m b M N Z M l~9 W - ~ ~ ~ ~~ U ~. W O V q°U~ ~°~~d ~ 1 J 1 Q '~ ~ - a ! ! a o IIII UII ~~ II ~i Agenda Memo February 10, 2004 Special City Council Meeting IV. REVIEW WIRELESS BROADBAND ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Determine whether the City of Eagan should take an active role in encouraging wireless infrastructure in the community. If yes, give direction to what kind of process and goals the City should have with respect to its governmental and city-wide wireless technology infrastructure. (This could include further staff research, the hiring of an expert consultant, referring the matter to a commission, soliciting advice from the local business community and its experts, or any combination of the above.) Specifically determine, in light of its economic development goals, whether the City of Eagan needs to formally assess the local area's technology infrastructure including wireless capabilities. FACTS: • The City of Eagan has recently been approached by a high speed wireless broadband provider wanting to place such technology on unused City water tower space and provide an alternative to broadband provided via cable modems. • Currently there is only one major provider of broadband services in Eagan and the City receives no franchise fees for use of its public rights of way for broadband services. • A company that recently chose not to come to Eagan cited wireless redundancy (in case its fiber connections were severed) as a reason for selecting Minneapolis or St. Paul instead of Eagan to locate. • With the advent of pocket personal computers and Personal Digital Assistants or PDAs (small handheld devices to digitally store information such as phone numbers, addresses, schedules, calendars, etc.}-a trend that is expected to continue-others US cities are seeing increasing demand from business and residential users of PDAs for wireless connectivity wherever they go within city limits. The City of Burnsville recently instituted a Technology Committee made up of the mayor, civic and business leaders, and city staff reportedly with the goal of having numerous wireless hot spots within Burnsville and specifically targeting medical technology companies to locate in Burnsville. Eagan does not currently have formal technology goals and wireless could represent a significant opportunity. ISSUES: • Numerous public policy questions are outlined in a January 20 memo to Administrator Hedges. ATTACHMENTS: • Attached on pages to~ of your packet is the Wireless Broadband Issues and Opportunity memo t Administrator Hedges • Also attached on page ~ Adis and an article about a local Eagan firm using wireless technology with its workforce. -. <-~ ~~f' ,~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMO City of Eagan CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR GARRISON January 20, 2004 Wireless Broadband Issues & Opportunities /Request for Council Feedback Last Fall the City of Eagan was approached by a Minnesota company wanting to build, at its cost, a wireless broadband network in Eagan that would be installed on City water towers and involve a very different revenue model than traditional lease arrangements. Broadband is the high speed conveyance of Internet traffic, typically through fiber in the ground, often using the public rights of way. Right now Comcast is the only broadband provider in Eagan. Wireless broadband is also high speed but uses small antennas placed on towers to convey Internet traffic point-to-point. The proposal involved the payment of a percentage of gross revenues from future wireless (residential and business customer) subscriptions in lieu of lease payments. Currently, because of a~ FCC ruling, cities are unable to collect franchise fees from cable modem service. Franchise fees in general have also come under attack and it is possible they will not survive the Internet taxation debate. A staff group consisting of Communications, Community Development, Finance, IT, Police, and Public Works has looked into the matter enough to know that while wireless broadband may offer a significant opportunity it also raises significant public policy issues that likely should be addressed by the City Council. The purpose of this memo is to briefly identify those policy issues, to ask guidance on how best to address them with the Council, and to determine how involved the Council would like us to be with any Wireless options before proceeding further. (See attached news article about a local firm using wireless technology.) Overview Currently more than 160 Minnesota cities have wireless broadband services covering all or parts of their localities. Many of these cities are small and rural where "in the ground" fiber is to expensive an option, but other cities such as Minneapolis, St, Paul, Bloomington and Burnsville are served by wireless broadband providers in competition with or as a redundant back-up too traditional cable modem service providers. Wireless Memo January 20, 2004 Though it made the final cut to three, recently the City of Eagan lost a bid to attract a significant technology-intensive company in part because of a perceived lack of redundancy in high speed connections in Eagan. Whether this lack of redundancy is perceived or real has yet to be verified with an actual inventory of technological assets. This much is clear. Wireless technology is becoming more prevalent. Whether in use in the home or business or with handheld devices, the use of wireless technology is growing and may pose an opportunity or strategy Eagan wishes to pursue. The Advantages of Ea~an's Active Involvement Eagan currently has unused tower capacity not currently producing leasing revenue A wireless broadband option would provide market competition for high speed Internet service for residents and businesses. Eagan could receive money for wireless Internet hookups, where currently it receives nothing from Cable modem hookups. If a provider covers all installation costs and can insure frequencies do not interfere with existing communications on those towers, there is little risk for the City. Provides a level of redundancy for businesses within Eagan and might save the City money or provide an alternative to future "in-the-ground" costs. Though not currently on the City's shopping list, wireless broadband could assist in police and security applications, particularly for remote surveillance of water facilities and other sensitive locations. Some cities are using Wi-Fi (short for "wireless fidelity") as an economic development tool to develop complete or ad hoc wireless local area networks (WLANs) to provide high-speed data connections between mobile data devices (such as laptops) and nearby Wi-Fi access points such as a "hot spot" at an airport, a library, a coffee shop or restaurant. A hotel might offer free wi-fi to guests. A company or university might offer on-premises free access for verified employees/students. Or a home user could set up their own network to which only they had access. This is the same band as some cordless phones, although the technologies are designed to co-exist and not interfere with different networks allowing different kinds of access. Disadvantages of Ea~an's Involvement In the short-term any revenues the City would generate off of wireless connections would be significantly less than traditional lease payments It is uncertain what effect competition with Comcast would have. While competition might moderate potential cable broadband price increases, would the City, in essence be competing against itself and weaken a cable provider that, at least currently, is paying franchise fees for its Cable TV connections? 9 Wireless Memo January 20, 2004 Unless adequately protected, wireless can be susceptible to access from the outside by unauthorized users. Security safeguards such as the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) encryption standard should be used. With many wireless providers under capitalized or sometimes "here today and gone tomorrow," does the City incur any blame or liability if such a venture fails? Public Policy Questions How active does the City of Eagan want to be in taking inventory of/defining/planning for/implementing Eagan's technology infrastructure? How active a player does Eagan City Government wish to be in providing its residents wireless Internet connections? Some cities have formal plans for how "wired" a community they wish to be in the future, others say, "Let the market decide," and still other cities seek public/private partnerships. Does Eagan want to have a technology plan? If yes, how should the investigation/research be conducted? What process should the City use? (Examples: Staff responsibility, hire a consultant, refer to a Commission, issue a request for proposal, etc.) What are the City's objectives? Some examples might be: 1. Revenue 2. More alternatives for the public 3. Increased operating efficiencies/decreased costs 4. Business recruitment tool Should the City participate in a percentage of hook-ups in lieu of standard or revised lease payments for tower rental? Is this an appropriate use of public facilities and does it create any precedent for future vendors seeking to use public facilities? To what extent is wireless capability or redundant capability in the City's interest as an economic development strategy? Is competition among broadband providers a good thing? To what extent does competition with Comcast help or hurt the City? Direction Sought: Pending your review and consideration, it seems that this matter would be appropriate to schedule for City Council discussion at an upcoming work session. I will await your direction before undertaking any other action. 1C~ y ~~ ~ ~r a, ~" _ _._ 1 %~; _ , ~s }. x ~~ ~ p 4 ~ , in ~ h k ~,1 q'S` ,: 6°'4 . g~ r~ . X t , . i^ ~~ _ ~s,,,,~. s ~+-~..~ ,T.,.~..-,.,n., .-.-~...t,~. ~...^` ^ '~ '~.,~ a ~ ) iN 4 r'a, + ~e ~ y:~ax *_„~` ~, rub' ~ of au^';° rr x S~ `~" ~ M n a ~ a ~ _sf r w -~ ~ ~` _ ~ ~ ',~.. SCOTT TAKUSHI, PIONEER PRES' Syntegra is setting up a transmitter on the Xcel Energy Center, pointing it at the ice palace, so that anyone here with a laptop can go online via Wi-Fi. Chris Korent, left, dnd Christian Deloia tarried the antenna to the Xcel roof. -. ~ •. t ~ -: .. x ; ~ d truck sto BY NLIO OJEDA-ZAPATA ' drivers at wireless-equippe 1. ~ - I f y021 ire Pioneer Press arowid the: country, and by Colorado police officers who file reports and consu I databases without .leaving their squ~; bringing your he Winter ~ Carnival ice gars p . t place most ` Starting today, a squarish Wi-~ trap laptop t0 the iCe glace Is the las MumeSOtanS WOUId expect ceiver perched atop the Xcel Energy Ce glace and need ter and pointed downward will blast to p to find ahigh-Speed wireless net- ice-palace .grounds with so2.llb-flavor bandwidth. work for com user users. to Check your p Any carnival visitor nutty enough lug along a laptop will be able to check ~~ e-mail, you'll Wireless FSdelity, used to interconnect mail and brovs~se the Web.. two or more machines and.get them all on But the high-speed network is intend find a the Internet, is commonly regarded as an mainly for ice palace staffers and contra indoor technology. The palace's chilly irate- tors ins>de heated trailers along the sit high-speed rioi doesn't exactly qualify. edges Many of these workers will be fr< But Wi-FY is incrdasingly being used tically tapping away on a half-dozen lI wireless network outdoors = by Twin Cities homebuilders laptops, and they'll live and die by a-mai _ -.who send electronic updates;to their home in place. office from inside their cars, by semi-truck COOL WIRELESS, SC ST. PAUL PIONEER PR ONTINUED FROM PAGE 1C Cool wireless (continued) So, the new wireless capabili- ty qualifies as a gift from King Koreas because the Wi-~-ready portables will have blazingly fast online access anywhere on palace grounds. The likely alternative, said ice palace operations director Shannon Pierce, would have Syntegra says such projects are intended to show the potential for 4Vi-Fi use beyond a single facility. been dashing back to the staff s Landmark Center offices for e- mail checks every 30 minutes. The Wi-Fi transceiver, sup- plied by the Syntegra USA tech- nology-consulting firm, is designed to transnut Wi-Pi sig- nal in a relatively narrow beam instead of sending it in all direc- tions, as wireless "access points" typically do. This is :intended to ensure that only people on the palace site will have access to the network This isn't the first time Syn- tegra USA, a subsidiary of British Telecom based in Arden fii]]s, has expersmented with outdoor Wi-)~ use. In October, it lanketed a portion of down- t~wn Minneapolis' Nit:ollet Mall xsing a transceiver atop the ' ton hotel so those attending a '. rldwide technology confer- '. ce could Web-surf and do eir a-mail while grabbing 'tes or beers. _~: And, in December, Syntegra t up" downtown St Paul's ' erCentre comrention center mposium. While this was ncally an indoor network, signal from a transceiver so far beyond the building it could be detected on state 94 and the High Bridge. Syntegra says such projects are intended to show the poten- tial for Wi-Fi use beyond a sin- gle facility. In rural areas and other places without ready access to broadband-quality Internet access, for instance, strategically placed wireless- networking gear can create something akin to a public utili- tyforaverage users. Properly designed Wi-)~ out- door networks can extend for miles, said Jo Boettcher, who directs Syntegra USA projects involving state and local govern- ments. Such networks already exist Police officers in Salida, Colo., can get online in their squad cars, for instance, thanks _ to Vivato Wi-Fi equipment installed on a mountain over- looking the town, creating wire- less coverage over a 6-square- mile area. Mutual funds son cng (continued) H11dA 8.47 +.01 ImVeIA 20.00 +.11 ImVaB 79.59 +.11 ImVaK) 19.97 +.77 Schwab Funds:. 1t)DOlrnr 3268 +23 SBP Inv 17.69 r.14 SmCplnv 20.30 -.07 TolBond 10.13• +.02 Sadder Funds A: DrrnFS A 12.26 +.19 DMiRA 39.16 +.47 GrUtA 9.06 +.04 H6ncA 5.57 +.01 MgdMuni p 9.44 -.02 TechA - 11.90 -.09 TotReU 8.86 +.04 USGovA 8.72 +.Ot Scudder vends B: DrFSB pp 1215 +.19 DreHAB 39.04 +.46 Scudder Funds S: Balan5 n.1s +.os GrolncS 20.87 +.16 HUhCare r 21.64 +21 IrdIFdS 40.78 +.27 L Val 24.06 +.18 gdMuni S 9.45 -.02 MedTF S 11.67 -.02 s.ll cng LDCpVA p 15.53 +.10 g A p 1279 +A1 MgMuA p 16.95 -.Dz MaMuA D 1326 -.02 SBCpirc 16.05 +.07 SmithBa 88 P: AgGrB 1 84.11 +.43 F~Va~ I 14~ +.02 L 12200 +.Oi Sm f+BamL.0,61: Adpnrl 9.ss AgGrL t 6458 +.43 FdVaL 74.70 +.02 LoCapl I 21.99 Smdh erney 1: LgCpCo1 17.66 +.09 SoundSh 35.04 +.31 Speetra Funds: Fund A 8.44 St FarmAssoe: Baton 4926 +25 Gwlh 46.15 +.34 Inlerm 10.10 +.01 Muni 888 -.01 Slate SV Resrch A: 34.10 +.22 Gpt3dlrn Tara +.u1 Troup: ~ Enlerpr 23.61 +.07 15.81 +.D4 GovSec 10.99 +.Ot 10.55 +.09 Gr201rn 1351 -A6 24.56 -25 Grwlhlm 16.02 21.49 -21 LgCapGr 21.64 +.07 11.51 -.04 OPPA4rn 41.76 +.Ot 7.07 +.03 Overseas 1167 +.10 380.+.03 SmCapVl 26.70 +.04 3.13 +.03 USEmGr 16.41 -.07 7.97 -.01 UttSUm 9.31 roue: UISIMuIrc 4.87 r 30.54 +.17 Strong Fds Advisor: 10.80 +.~ US Value 1626 +.18 150.64 +1.19 Sun Capital Adv: ids: DavisWal 9.76 10.14 +.01 ReaiEst 15.15 VaISmCap 15.04 ' 31.53 +23 SunAmerlee Funds: 9.94 -.03 Fba1C 9.37 10.21 -.11 , T 26.63 -.14 aey A: TCW Ga01eo Fds: 9257 +.47 SelEgry 17.98 -.04 14.13 +.DB TCW Ga1Ueo N: _----- t..m --^~- -. On a somewhat smaller scale, truckers who pull up to any of more than two dozen rests stops around the country can get Wi-~ access courtesy of Truckstop.Net The firm plans about 3,000 such "hot spots" in a partnership with Sprint IBM last year also jumped into truck-stop Wi->{ i as a poten- tial moneymaking venture, announcing plans to setup 1,000 hot spots with several partners. Closer to home, Eagan-based Brandl Anderson Homes has equipped its construction super- intendents with Windows-based Tablet PCs that incorporate Wi- Fl capabilities. The workers use the comput- ers tokeep track of construction projects in the southern Twin Cities. When they need to upload the information to the home office and download other data, they pull up to a~ of sev- eral Brandl Anderson model W.TWINCITIES.COM homes, which have Wi-~ access points. Then, right in their cars, they click to sync with the cen- tralserver. One local outdoor-wireless experiment has foundered. Mears Park in downtown St Paul recently went dark when the FireVue technology firm deactivated its Wi-~ transceiv- er in a nearby building and moved out. But plans to set up a larger Wi-FY outdoor network in Min- neapolis' Loring Park are appar- ently on track Organizers have purchased all necessary equip- ment and hope to officially fire up the network in March or April Julio Ojeda-Zapata writes about personal technology. Reach him at jojeda@pioneerpress.co7n or 651-228-5467. See his personal- technology 7.oeblog at http:/(yourtech. typepad. com. s.n cng 5sp cog ToUlntl 11.06 +.06 SpcTchA 4.72 -.06 Grolrc 11.fi4 +.09 AsselA 23.25 +.15 TotStlc 26.98 +.18 SlWlncAt 10.40 Third Avenue Fdc: CHIT 71.44 •.O7 Value 19.55 +.20 TFMA 10.53 -.01 Value 43.36 +.09 CapValue 10.74 +.10 Vanguard InsU Fds: Wells Fargo B: ThompconPlumb: CapOpp 27.42 InsUOx 705.11 +.BZ AsWIB 11.T/ +.OB Bafaneed 19.03 +.15 Convrt 13.86 +.03 Mamaggeqpx~int Fds: CaTxF B 11.66 -.Ol fiord 10.95 +.01 Energy 30.98 +22 AggDpp 9.44 +.03 B tll 10 39 07 C DivEgB p 39.88 +.25 49 36 53 E B CravUr 46 85 a fi3 Egktc 2282 +.19 +. re . . +. g1dx t Thornburg Fds: E1g7F 70.29 -.17 Egirc 8.09 +.07 Gth6 8.21 +.D4 L1MuAp 14.03 -.01 GNMA 10.55 +.D1 Cvowlh 8.37 +.03 GrthElalA 37.27 +.16 ValueA 30.37 +.13 GlobEq 76.27 +.DS GfW81rc 9.73 +.Ofi GroBaIB t 28.67 +.14 To Fundc: R Grolrlc 28.65 +24 MSmC16 1245 +.02 IncEgB 34.64 +.31 rd 40,76 +.35 Fu GN1Eq 9.70 +.04 MPLgTG 20.12 +.10 IMIEgB 11.36 +.f0 TCU Govern9.51 HYCorpr 6.47 +.D1 MPTrdGr 20.95 +.07 IntGvlBt 11.30 +.Ot Tumor Funds: H11hGe 124.01 +1.44 Victory: LrCoGB d4.62 +.13 I,g~C,g, ~,qg .,02 In8aPr0 1240 +.04 DvsStA 15.3a +.12 LtTmIrcB p 10.26 +.01 Tweady Browns: InUGr 1687 +A6 WM Blair Mil Fds: NaTFlnc I 10.53 -.01 GbbVal 20.46 +.01 In1Nal 275..' +25 Groa4hl t 10.41 +.04 Ou18c108 D 12.22 +.OS U RCorp 10.23 +.Dl WM Str Asset Mgmt: 1 p1202pg 1 12.86 +.08 ffTsry 71.52 +.02 BalanfAP 263 +.OS OL2D3pgt 13.31 +.OB US Global Imrestors: LUeCan 1485 +.OS Balaru~ l 12fi0 +.OS OL20408 p 73.88 +.10 VAdGId 76.38 -2D LBeGro 18.77 +.11 ConGrB t 13.20 +.07 SmCapB 115.38 +.07 USAAGroup: LUelnc 13.42 +.03 Wadde9SReedAdv: SpcTch81 4.61 -.OS AgvGt 26.46 +.17 UfeMod 17.09 +.OB Acun 5.91 +.03 SibincB p 10.38 (SnstStr 26.25 +.18 LTCorp 9.46 +At AssetSp 6.99 +.03 StrglnBt 11.25 +.Ot GNMA 9.99 +.Ot LT'isry 11.60 +D7 Con Irc 7.09 +.04 Wells Fargo InsU: GrvM 1268 +.09 Mag 15.47 +A4 CorelmA 5.21 +.03 CyTxF I 77.46 -.Ot Gr&Inc 18.44 +.14 Mu 70.88 -A1 k Inc 7.65 +.01 COTE I 17.04 -.01 IncStlc 15.95 +20 MulnsLg 13.04 -.03 NCcptA P 7-89 . p4 DvSCaPI 13.60 +.Ot Into 1255 +.01 MuIM 13.81 -.02 ScTechA 9.78 -A2 DivBd I 26.26 +.02 S8P Idx 17.24 +.13 Mul.td i t.12 -.0/ VangA 8.46 -.Ot DivEq I 41.06 +.25 SaTerh 9.90 -.10 Mulong 17.66 -.01 Wasateh: GrBffi 1 29.07 +.15 TxEB 13.46 -.02 MuShrt 15.78 CoreGr 38.79 +22 G,Eq I 29.18 +.12 TxEIT 14.15 -.03 Pmtcp r 55.89 +.34 SmCpGr 37.54 -.02 GgU 14.19 +.D7 TxESh 10.91 -.01 RER r 15.20 +.03 Wettz Funds: Inc I 9.69 +.07 V- SeNalu r 16.01 +.11 Hickory 28.91 +.20 IncEq I 34.62 +.31 STAR 17.76 +.07 Value 37.54 +.36 Index I 46.Ofi +.35 Veius Una Fd: STCorp 10.63 Wells Fargo A: 1nsIlEM 5275 -.11 Fund 14.78 +.04 STFed 10.62 • AstAdA 19.38 +.13 IntGW 71.32 +.01 Van Kamp Funds A: STTsry 10.66 CA TA A 70.71 -.01 InUEq 1 t.77 +.10 AggGrA p 1298 +.Ot StratEq 19.74 +.07 CALF A 17.43 -.02 ' LgCoGrl 46.50 +.14 CmstA p 16.54 +.71 TzMCAp r 26.39 +.17 F A 11.03 -.02 COT LidTTFI 11.11 -.01 EGA p 37.50 -.OS T~dv1Gl r 25.03 +.20 DivEgA 41.08 +.26 MN TF I 1127 - D7 EmA p 72.22 +.06 TxMSC r 18.33 +.06 EglncA 34.67 +.31 98 +.OB ModBal I 21 EgMcA p 8.13 +.07 USGro 75.86 +.OS Eyqldx 49.57 +.39 . MnSDGBd 1026 ' GvScAp 10.43 +.Ot GrlnAp 18.64 +.2t WeBsly 21.18 +.08 WelUn 29.40 +.14 GIhA 12.02 +.06 FfiYeldA 10.84 +.01 ~.~~ 12.44 +A2 HYMuAp 10.65 Wnds 16.98 +.15 IncPlusA 11.25 +.01 MontEMF 22.28 -.13 MTFA p 19.28 •.04 Wndsll 27.40 +29 IdxAOA 14.90 +.12 NETxFr 10.37 -.02 PacaA p 6.87 +.04 Vanguard Idx Fds: InUEg4 p 77.79 +.10 Ou18c201D1 1230 +.05 USGvAP 14.17 +.Ot 500 106.02 +.B2 IntGvlAp 17.33 +.01 OL20201 13.09 +.07 Van Kamp Funde B: Balanced 18.78 +.08 LggCoGrA 49.01 +.14 Outlk203Di 13.64 +.09 CmsU3 t 18.54 +.11 CalSoc 7.81 +.OS MN TF A 11.27 -.02 OL2049 l 14.59 +.11 EGB t 3244 -.04 EMM 1247 -.07 MoMTRetA 12.65 +.01 ShGlrcl 10.06 +.01 EglncBt 8.01 +.07 Europe 2286 +.21 MnEMFr 2240 -.13 SmCepl ifi.59 +.01 GrlncB t 78.49 +.21 EMend 28.19 +.06 MontMdCp 5.96 +.02 SmCpOpl 31.98 +.26 Van Kemp Funds C: GrovAh 25.79 +.12 MontSDur 10.25 SmCGr 1 29.60 -.13 CornSlkC 16.55 +.11 ITBnd 10.85 +.02 MonSCpA 11.72 SmCoVaO p1328 +.06 EgIrlcCt 8.04 +.07 LTBnd 17.76 +.Ot OL20f0A 1221 +.OS SUdlncl 10.41 +.Ot Van Wagoner Funds: MidCap 13.71 +.02 OL2020A 12.96 +.07 StrGrAAO 13.47 +A8 EmgGro p 7.33 -.17 Padfie 8.32 +.02 q-2p30A 13.53 r.09 StrMel 33 MiaoCp p 14 39 - SmCap 24.07 +.02 _ - . . smr ,> ~'~