The URL can be used to link to this page

10/03/2006 - City Council Regular (2) AGENDA Flk., EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING October 3, 2006 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P. t If. ADOPT AGENDA (At approximately 8:00 p.m. the Council will take a short recess) 111. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS IV. CONSENT AGENDA P. A. A. APPROVE MINUTES B. PERSONNEL ITEMS P. C. APPROVE CHECK REGISTERS ?7. 1(~ D. SET public hearing date for November 9, 2006 to certify delinquent utility bills P E. SET public hearing date for November 9, 2006 to certify delinquent false alarm bills F. SET public hearing date for November 9, 2006 to certify delinquent weed cutting bills P • G. APPROVE On-Sale liquor on Sunday license for Time Out Management Eagan, Inc. dba Time Out Restaurant & P • 13 Sports Bar, 2864 Highway 55, Suite 900 . lq H. PRESENT assessment roll and schedule public hearing for November 9, 2006 for Project 928 (Alexander Road/Meadowview Road) street improvement 5 I. APPROVE list of Election Judges for November 7, 2006 General Election P.29 J. APPROVE Resolution of support for Dakota County Capital Improvement Plan (2007-2011) p• 3C) K. APPROVE Amendment of Housing Improvement District Policy to incorporate National Reserve Study Standards 3 requirement . L. AUTHORIZE preparation of short term lease agreement for Community Action Council - Armful of Love Program at Cedarvale Mall P • 35 M. AWARD contract to Harris Contracting Co. for the purpose of installing additional energy saving equipment at the Eagan Civic Arena, Authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate documents and adjust the approved 2007 budget. P343 N. ACCEPT a donation of perennial plants to be placed in Central Park P. t440. APPROVE Tobacco License for Jacque Johnson, 4205 Nicols Road (Eagan Citgo) APPROVE Tobacco License for Osman Musani, 4206 Nichols Road (Go For It Gas) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4(7 A. ASSESSMENT Roll for Project 932 (Whispering Woods, Slater Acres & Slater Road) Street Overlay to, I B. ASSESSMENT Roll for Project 933 (O'Leary Lane, Golfview Dr., Town Centre Dr.) Street Overlay C. ASSESSMENT Roll for Project 926 (Saddlehom, Sunset Add., Northview Meadows) Street Overlay iq D. ASSESSMENT Roll for Project 927 (Meadowland I", Beaver Dam Road, Suncliff I"- 5`h ) Street Overlay 2 E. VACATION, public easement - Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4 F. VACATION, public easement - Eagandale Office Park 5`h Addition G. HOUSING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - consider establishment of Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Area • and approval of Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement fee V1. OLD BUSINESS f 2 A. AMENDMENT to winter parking restrictions (Ordinance 9.09 Winter Season Parking) and RESOLUTION for parking signs on Denmark Court E&W, and Denmark Trail E&W B. RECEIVE bids/award contract (Contract 06-08) North Ridge Dr./Sibley Terminal Industrial Park/Fish Lake storm • sewer outlet & Shawnee Rd. catch basins VII. NEW BUSINESS A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - Byerly's - A planned development amendment to allow outdoor storage of seasonal items located at 1299 Promenade Place on Lot 8 & 9, Block 2, Eagan Promenade 3`d Addition in the SW '/4 of Section 10 S5 B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - Grand Oak Five (Time Out Restaurant & Sports Bar) - A planned development amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure located at 2864 Highway 55 on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five in the SE 'A of Section 02 (W1 C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - Wells Fargo Bank - A planned development to allow a 3`d ATM machine and a drive lane located at 3390 Pilot Knob Road on Lot 1, Block 1, Northwest I" Addition in the SW of Section 10 D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT -Superior Auto Center - A planned development amendment for an expansion of an existing auto service.center to include collision repair service located at 3425 Washington Drive on Lot 1 & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial Third Addition in the NE ''A of Section 16 VIII. LEGISLATIVEANTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE IX. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY There will be no formal EDA meeting, but the Council will be asked to hold an executive session as the EDA to discuss Cedarvale business relocation efforts and Grand Slam relocation negotiations. X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XII. CLOSED SESSION XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. City of Edemo TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 3, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA After approval is given to the October 3, 2006 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. I Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the September 14, 2006 Special City Council meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of the September 14, 2006 Special City Council meeting are enclosed on pages 13-through MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 5:30 P.M. EAGAN ROOM - EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER City Council members present: Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers: Carlson, Fields, Tilley, Maguire. City staff present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller, Administrative Services Director VanOverbeke, Chief Financial Officer Pepper, Community Development Director Hohenstein, Public Works Director Colbert, Communications Director Garrison, Parks & Recreation Director Johnson, Campus Facilities Manager Vaughn, Superintendent of Operations Mesko, City Planner Ridley, Administration Intern Ziemer. 1. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Geagan called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. City Administrator Hedges requested changes to the agenda: review of the 2007 Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau budget; a schedule change for the next City Council meeting, moving it from Sept. 25 to Sept. 26; and discussion of tax exempt financing for Trinity School. Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to adopt the agenda as presented. Aye: 5, Nay 0. IL VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. III. CANVAS BALLOTS FOR SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION (MAYO & CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES ONLY) Administrator Hedges stated that every two years it is the responsibility of the City Council to canvas ballots and approve election results. Administrative Services Director VanOverbeke stated that voter turnout of the September 12 primary election was 11.4 percent. VanOverbeke reported the following people were moving on to the November 7 general election: Mayor - Mike Maguire and Cyndee Fields; City Council - Peggy Carlson, Paul Bakken, Gary Hansen, and Buzz Anderson. Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to certify the results of the September 12, 2006 municipal primary election. Aye: 5, Nay 0. 3 IV. WINDOW SIGN TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Administrator Hedges presented a recommendation from the Eagan Window Sign Task Force directing the Council to delegate the consideration of an amendment to the city code section regulating window signage to the Advisory Planning Commission. Community Development Director Hohenstein stated that the task force completed its review of the city code pertaining to signs and is recommending removal of the four-to-six-foot clear zone restriction; permit up to 60 percent window coverage; identify a process for grandfathering existing signage, requiring businesses to conform with new sign standards within seven years; and allow for exemptions for businesses that already comply, instead of requiring permits. Hohenstein stated that an issue pertaining to the maximum allowable sign coverage on the side of a building - 20 percent - remained unresolved. The question remaining was whether the 20 percent should include window signage or be in addition to window signage. Councilmember Carlson asked that the Police Department review the recommendation and analyze it for public safety concerns. Carlson also asked that the Advisory Planning Commission discuss signage on all glass buildings. Councilmembers Fields, Carlson, and Maguire thanked the task force for its work reviewing the city code pertaining to signage. Councilmember Tilley moved; Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to send the task force recommendation regarding window signage to the Advisory Planning Commission. Councilmember Carlson offered an amendment to the motion that the Commission also consider all unresolved issues relating to window signage; Fields accepted. Aye: 5, Nay 0. V. PROPOSED 2007 PUBLIC UTILITY ENTERPRISE BUDGETS Administrator Hedges introduced the proposed 2007 Public Utility Enterprise Fund Budgets. Hedges stated that city enterprise functions are self-sustaining, and not supported by property taxes. Hedges reported proposed 2007 budgets for the following utilities: Water Utility - $3,148,200, up 18.3 percent or $488,000 over the 2006 budget; Sanitary Sewer - $4,848,500, up 7.3 percent or $328,100; Street Lighting - $491,800, up 14.7 percent or $63,000; Storm Drain - $190,300, up 27.6 percent or $41,200; and Water Quality - $582,700, up 3 percent or $17,000. Hedges also noted the special circumstances and reasons for the increases. Councilmember Carlson questioned the impact of increase on consumer bills. Public Works Director Colbert stated that the formal fee structure study was not yet completed; however, preliminary increases are expected to be minimal, 5 percent or less, which is in line with past increases. Colbert added that although the city is producing more water, due to increasing demands, it is also selling more water. That balances out the operating costs. Administrative Services Director VanOverbeke stated that once the fee schedule is complete the Council will see the proposed utility increases. VanOverbeke added that the rate increases will take effect in 2007. Colbert reported that consulting fees and lab testing related to water quality studies is one reason the Water Quality budget is increasing. Administrator Hedges said the Public Utility Enterprise budget matter will be brought back as a consent agenda item at a future Council meeting. 1~ VI. CASCADE BAY BUDGET Administrator Hedges introduced the proposed 2007 Cascade Bay operating budget of $1,211,500, a 3.1 percent increase over the 2006 budget of $1,175,200. Hedges stated that the increase includes a $1 rate increase for admission, the first increase since 2003. Councilmember Carlson questioned if new hotel-waterpark venues were impacting Cascade Bay attendance. Parks & Recreation Director Johnson stated she did not believe they were. Johnson said those facilities served different clientele, and that the new facility near the Mall of America charged approximately $30 per person. Carlson stated city staff have done a good job keeping rates affordable, stating Cascade Bay needs to start recouping inflationary costs once absorbed. Administrator Hedges said the Cascade Bay operating budget will be brought back as a consent agenda item at a future Council meeting. VII. EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER BUDGET Administrator Hedges introduced the proposed 2007 Community Center operating budget of $1,588,100, an increase of 8.7 percent over the 2006 budget of $1,461,400. Hedges also noted the scheduled bond payment - principal and interest - of $1,133,200 for 2007 to retire outstanding debt for the building; the 2006 bond payment was $1,138,000. The debt service was approved by voters through a referendum. Administrator Hedges discussed the addition of a coffee and beverage service operation in the Eagan Community Center. Hedges stated it was the wish of the City Council to proceed with a 12-18 month trial run of the coffee bar to minimize operations. The coffee bar would be built into existing services. Parks & Recreation Director Johnson said the coffee bar would be managed in house, and that the city is looking for a private, featured label. Councilmember Carlson said she was looking forward to seeing how the teens would market the coffee bar. Hedges introduced a proposal to make an organizational change to the Community Center, eliminating the Community Center Manager position and replacing it with two Manager on Duty positions, which would enhance customer service throughout the Center. Councilmember Carlson stated that the change would help address relationship issues. Councilmembers Maguire and Tilley expressed concern that the organizational change would not affect customer service. Operations Superintendent Mesko stated that the next 12-18 months would help determine how the facility would operate. Administrator Hedges noted capital outlay expenses, including room darkening shades at the Oaks ($20,000) and Gym ($7,000). The shades would improve day time presentations in the Oaks and with late day gym activities. Hedges also shared the Community Center marketing plan with Council members, including 2006 marketing activities. Administrator Hedges said the Eagan Community Center budget and organizational changes will be brought back as a consent agenda item at a future Council meeting. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. EAGAN CONVENTION & VISITORS BREAU 2007 BUDGET & MARKETING OVERVIEW Administrator Hedges introduced the proposed 2007 Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau budget of $768,500, an increase of $18,500 over 2006 budget. Hedges introduced Brent Cory, Executive Director, and Ron Breedlove, Chairperson, from the ECVB. Breedlove discussed direction of the ECVB. Cory reviewed budget highlights. Hedges and Administrative Services Director VanOverbeke discussed the three core market segments of the ECVB - leisure travel, meeting/corporate travel, and group/sports travel sales. Councilmember Maguire moved; Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to place the 2007 Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau budget on a future City Council agenda for approval. Aye: 5, Nay 0. B. MISCELLANEOUS The City Council moved the September 25, 2006 regular Council meeting to September 26, 2006. The City Council determined no interest in issuing tax exempt bonds to assist in financing the new Trinity School in Eagan. The conclusion is consistent with the response to a similar request from Faithful Sheperd. IX. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Maguire moved; Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to adjourn at 7:12 p.m. Aye: 5, Nay: 0. L R 3 y O QR H ~ O Z co W O 0 -0 C a O O rG O J W Z Z O °d bn J L W fn R' W Y w > A W C C 0 O J Q w LL. V Q Z V Z LL Q a W i 0 d Q 0 F~ Y Q C O y NQN m x 0 ate, O -0.0 i. (Q Q: Z W Z W G' C09 N d' W by v vdi y~ u a~+ ♦v+ o Y 0 a x w w a a Y 2 M 0 0 0 0 0 y o: C) m c~ a m m m o X cd w Q h- > 1-0 J N N ti m ti eo O 0 v N N r ' A y r 40 r Ltf N r N r 0 N 1.- m w-T W M m h h r f0 v 10 M Cl) N sT co et co m 0) CM r 0) h N O M N Lo r d r N r r 0,- M C) W: CD O n O n m m O M O m O ~t LL~ M m c 11. 4] N N fO Cl) M U') M lD O N N N m n T O ID I~ t0 O N m N C V O O O - O O 47 e 0... O n N N m n O u') ho O M M N N N N N N N n n W m N co m LL) d' O co O m O M R d' N c m O N N O M m O (D p~ m r m N N V W N N M ee~~ [D m ~D m O sf st CO O O O. lO N v lo c co co V' 7 N Y M co Ln r O n O m M n m O m O n M LL~ O CD u"r O O u) O n _O n N M CO O M Lo V T N ti N N M h N [D N CO t0 M O N M O ID 7 O 0 O CD O M N ID O ~D O N m m co N C'rJ a m co to O tD n O h 00 M N N M m tO O CO n c N m M N m M u) !D n M 0 N N N r;. O fO m n n CO n N M N M (co O O m m m n e V. co U) N N 00 7 7 LLi to 'a N N R W C6 N? N M M O n 0 W N O M O O m tD C CO c CD N ~T N M M v N 7 d' N M N O N N n m to 0 N n v (0 oa M ov V U.) N r n O m_ ~ n v Q ~ m rn O O 10 O M v o CO n (D O m nn NID ON NCO n m v M N O O M M M M ~O (O O M O n fD N (p _ v _ (O m O e O ao W _ N N o0 7 C, O O 7 u) m CO N ~O fp O m m O fD O n CD CD O tD O 10 O O O o V ^ O M M^ M O CD m m CD m m N N N N O 0 ~ M1 M m ~i m CO CD V' O N O N w m CO n aD O M M n c O n O N m 10 V 0 M N W O O W m m N N CD m O m n 'T O iW0 O N w N N ~D 7 iD m c O n m V v 4) O O O N l- f- M C+M1 N N N m M n 1C1 CD M M CO N V m N O N n O O e N N O O M O co to aD O N CO tD N M co CD O m N Lt) m m f-- co fD 0 M O n m O N m O o N m O N N m N V m O N - n M V O co N O n N N M CO 7 O n N m tD -co O Cp N M V- N c N /Z N co M co 0 M N O N O N 1n CO a M M N m co m M co O m CO O w m fD ED M O m 't Lo m N e n M N N N M N n W M M M o co m n [D m tD N N O m O M -co n O W N n m c N ED M c CO n 47 m N N m O N N N N lD [O m N CD O N (D V' (O In m It O O 7 ~C1 V m ~fl M 47 N N M m m O O n ~t _z z w / V Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS There are no Personnel Items scheduled at this time. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting C. RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To ratify the check register dated September 28, 2006 as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Check register dated September 28, 2006 is enclosed without page number. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA D. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2006 TO CERTIFY DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to consider the final assessment of the delinquent utility bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: On a semi-annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent utility balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. ~b Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting E. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2006 TO CERTIFY DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to consider the final assessment of the delinquent false alarm bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: ➢ On a semi-annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent false alarm balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. ➢ The City currently has 26 delinquent accounts in the amount of $3,740. Additional information will be provided at the time of the public hearing. ATTACHMENTS (0): ~I Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting F. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2006 TO CERTIFY DELINQUENT WEED CUTTING BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to consider the final assessment of the delinquent weed cutting bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: ➢ On a semi-annual basis, the City reviews and considers delinquent weed cutting balances for certification to property tax statements for collection. ➢ The City currently has 7 delinquent accounts in the amount of $2,565.44. Additional information will be provided at the time of the public hearing. ATTACHMENTS (0): 12. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting G. APPROVE ON-SALE LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LICENSE FOR TIME OUT MANAGEMENT EAGAN INC. DBA TIME OUT RESTAURANT & SPORTS BAR, 2864 HIGHWAY 55, SUITE 900 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the on-sale liquor and Sunday license for Time Out Management Eagan, Inc. dba Time Out Restaurant & Sports Bar, 2864 Highway 55, Suite 900. FACTS: ➢ The new owners of Time Out Management Eagan, Inc. Tooradj (Tony) Bakhtiari and Farhad (Hud) Rassouli, have applied for an on-sale liquor and Sunday license with the City of Eagan. The restaurant will be located at 2864 Highway 55, Suite 900. ➢ The owners also have restaurants in Blaine, Elk River, and Fridley. ➢ The required documents have been submitted, reviewed and deemed in order by City staff. The application should be approved subject to the successful completion of background checks on the principals of the company, which are being conducted by the Police Department. ATTACHMENTS (0): 13 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting H. PROJECT 928, ALEXANDER ROAD/ MEADOWVIEW ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS- FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 928 (Alexander Road/ Meadowview Road - Street Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 9, 2006. FACTS: • Project 928 provided for upgrade of Meadowview Road to current City standards and resurfacing of Alexander Road, located west of Highway 13 in northwest Eagan. The project also provided for the construction of concrete entrance aprons to commercial/ industrial properties along both streets, and the realignment of a portion of Alexander Road. The street improvements were completed as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. • This project, constructed under Contract 06-02, has been completed, all costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. The assessments are based upon the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for all such assessable properties. . • This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited properties. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled prior to the final assessment hearing with the affected property owners and address any concerns. • The final assessments are less than or equal to the estimates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 21, 2006. Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting 1. APPROVE LIST OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 7, 2006 GENERAL ELECTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the list of election judges for the November 7, 2006 General Election. ATTACHMENTS (1) 1 • Attached on pages + (0 through Z 1 is the list of election judges for the Primary Election. 15 General Election Nudges - November 7, 2006 LAST NAME FIRST ADERHOLD LINDA AGRIMSON LOIS AMELL LUCILLE ANDERSON KAYE ANDERSON CAROL ANDERSON DON ASTLEFORD SHARON BAHR DARLENE BAKER MARION BARTYZAL VALERIE BATTIS VIRGINIA BELL TERI BELLILE GROVER BERKOPEC JINNY BEST ELAYNE BLACK NEAL BOHLIG GEORGE BOHLIG JOAN BOHN FRANCIS BONNETT JASON BRANDBERG JOHN BREKKE MARCIA BRINK MURIEL BROST KENT BURBACH TRICIA BURKARD SHIRLEY BUTLER ELIZABETH CANNELLA ROBERT Friday, September 29, 2006 Page I of 9 I LAST NAME FIRST CARLSON DOROTHY CARNEY PETER CASS KATIE CHRISTOPHERSON JUDY COHOES KAREN COLBERT SCOTT COLEMAN TONY COLOGNA DIANE COOK GAIL COOK LARRY COOK MIKE CRANE WENDY DAHLQUIST JENNIFER DANIEL FRANCIS DANNER MARGO DARE KAREN DeNARDO BOB DEVINE JUDY DIDRIKSON ERIK DODGE GERIANNE DZIELSKY SHIRLEE EARL SOPHIE EVARTS SUSAN FAIRCHILD CARALYNE FELBER KATHY FIENE ALAN FISCHER CHARLES FLADMARK ROBERT FLADMARK MARY FORSMAN SONI Friday, Sep:ember 29, 2006 Page 2 of 9 LAST NAME FIRST FOSS MARY FOSSUM MAVIS FOX BARBARA FREDLUND ROGER FREUND CAROL GEAGAN SUE GIEL SHARON GIGNAC MILLIE GLEWWE CARL GOEDKEN RONALD GOESS BERNADINE GOESS ART GOETZ RUTH GOIN LIZ GRASS DARELL GUSTIN JOHN HAGBERG MARY HAGEN KAY HAGEN LORI HAIR TOM HAMES CINDY HANDLER LAURA HANSEN PAUL HANSEN JUDY HARMON JEAN HARTLEBEN MILDRED HARVEY EILEEN HASH HERDIS HASH ORLANDO HAUSLADEN NANCY Friday, September 29, 2006 Page 3 of 9 O LAST NAME FIRST HAUSLADEN RAY HEALY BEA HEIR DONNA HOBOT DIANNE HOLZEMER MARION HUDSON BILL IFFERT RICHARD INGERSON NANCY JABBRA VICKIE JACKSON JAMES JACKSON ELIZABETH JANDEWERTH HENRY JOHNSON GARY JOHNSON LUCIA JOHNSON PENNY JONES CHRISTINE JONES MARGIE JORGENSON DARLETTE JUST PHILLIP KAEDER PATRICIA KAESS MIKE KAHN JAMES KAHN CARRIE KAHNKE DEBRA KAMBEITZ BERNETTA KELLEY AMY KELLGREN COREY KIEMELE MELINDA KING ROLANDO KIRGISS JEAN Friday, September 29, 2006 Page 4 of 9 LAST NAME FIRST KIVI DEANNA KLANG SHIRLEE KOESTER BARBARA KOMPELIEN DAVID KOSEK CAROLYN KRECH SHARON KREHL RHONDA KREITZ ALICE KRUEGER PAM KRUEGER CINDY KULLER ABBEY LANE MARIE LaPOINTE LISA LARKIN JOHN LEE DAISY LEEAN DON LEMAY RICHARD LIBERTY DONNA LIGHT LAURIE LINK ARTHUR LOUIS CHARLEEN LUCIANO ZENAIDA MACKEY BETTY MADDEN WILLIAM MANKE JO ANN MARCH BARBARA ANN MAYERS AL MAZIERSKI ROSE ANN MCCLOSKEY JUDITH MCDONALD KATHY Friday, September 29, 2006 Page 5 of 9 LAST NAME FIRST MCDONALD DENNIS MCGUIRE MARY MCKEOWN WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN LAVERNE MESEROW HALE MESEROW SUE MEYER GARY MILLER SHARON MILLER JUDY MORRISON KENNETH MORTELL KATHARINA MUNDAHL JUDY MUNSON RUTH MUNSTERMAN MARY NELSON JUDITH A NICOLAY RICHARD NORBERG JARED O'BRIEN WENDE O'GORMAN MARK O'GORMAN LYNN OHM ELDORIS OLSON DOUGLAS OPRIS DOROTHY PATNODE JIM PATTNI KATHY PAUL PATTI PEARSON DARLENE PETERSON JANE PETERSON WILLIAM PETTY LISA Friday, Sepiember 2Y, 2000 Wage 6 of 9 LAST NAME FIRST PFEIFER CARLA PHILLIPS CHARLEEN PILNEY MARY POECHMANN NANCY REISDORFER STAN REISHUS FREDERICK RENISH SALLY RESTAD ARLEN REYES CANDACE REYMANN PAT RICKE PATRICIA ROSS BETTY RUZICKA MARTIE SCHINDELDECKER MILLIE SCHINDELDECKER WILLARD SCHMIDT BARB SCHMITZ PAMELA SCHUTT ROGER SCHWAPPACH DONALD SCHWAPPACH KATHRYN SCHWARTZ BEVERLY SCHWARTZ MELISSA SCHWIETERS MARY SEAVERS VIC SEKTNAN DONALD SEVERSON JODY SHEARON MARY SHELDON ARLENE SHERIDAN MEGAN SHUMER ROB Friday, September 29, 2006 Page 7 of 9 27--- LAST NAME FIRST SHUMER SUSAN SIROTIAK ANDREW SKLUZACEK TED SMITH NANCY I SORENSON SEDONIA (SID) SQUIERS PHYLLIS STEVENS JANET STEVENS DONALD STUEWE MARIE SULLIVAN BRIAN SWEDEAN JOYCE SWEDEAN DICK SWIERCZEK LINDA TAYLOR CEYLON TEICH JANE THOMAS ANN THOMPSON WARREN THORSTENSON ARDIS TIEDEMANN JAMIE TRAUTMAN NANCY TURNHAM DALE TYRE ROYCE UECKER KAREN VANOVERBEKE JOANN VARGHESE SHAM VASATKA ALEX VIERRA BILL VIHOVDE FRED VIHOVDE CAROL VIMR ROSE Priday, September 2Y, 2006 Page 8 of 9 23 LAST NAME FIRST VOGT DALE VOLK ARDITH WAND JOHN WAND DELLA WANDERSEE KAY WARD JERRY WARWEG CAROLYN WASHINGTON MARY WASVICK LYNN WATTS LINDA WEINZETL KATHY WEISE SHARON WESTBROOK MAVIS WILLIAMS EILEEN WILSON TERESA WIRTH BARBARA WISNEW FRANK WITT ERICA WOLF MORGAN WORKE KAREN MOMM1w Friday, September 29, 2006 Page 9 of 9 2 General Election - November 7, 2006 Absentee Election Judge List Bauer, Fran Beck, Sidney Beseke, Carolyn Elbert, Mary Ellen Hazel, Kim Johnson, Gerald Mattson, Richard McNearney, Regina Pedersen, Mary Jane 'Perin, Ruth Severson, Jodi Stevenson, Cheryl Tumini, Carol Zinck, Jackie 25 Student Judges - Burnsville High School General Election, November 7, 2006 Allison, Nate Kwok, Amy Artasevych, Denys Larson, Mitch Atkin, Michele Le, Josh Ault, Abbie Leonard, Nick Becker, Amanda Letich, Megan Behnke, Liz Lomenda, Shayla Bergen,Ann Macht, Ben Berquist, Allison Madson, Sammy Borgfelt, Breanne Manias, Kristin Bristol, Rick Maxon, Jacob Burns, Jake Mccol, Andrew Burns, Krista McGinnis, Erin Carothers, Dana Mcgraw, Jake Casperson, Steve Meyers, Tony Childs, Katelyn Miller, Katie Christensen, Alex Mogaka, Samuel Christiansen, Seth Mohamed, Sudi Clever, Jamie Mohamud, Hodan Corrigan, Mike Mohr, Samatha Cummings, Kate Mortinson, Lindsey Dennis, John Murphy, cory Duffy, Patrick Nguyen, Jordan Eide, Jill Nimtz, Charlie Fagot, Ben Okolue, Nnamdi Fisher, Sean Pagel, Brian Flynn, Leo Peterson, Janie Foss, Rachel Platt, Lauren Fulton, Derek Powell, Nicole Gorzaemi, Joe Priebe, Jenny Hager, Karen Rausch, Briana Hansen, Rachel Ray, Susan Hanson, Alex Reddy,Candice Helfenstein, Jessie Rice, Anne Henriksen, Paul Richardson, Kirsten Ische, Will Rothestein, Ben Jensen, Andrea Ryan, Amber Jesmoh, J.C. Ryber, Jacki Johnson, Jenna Saini, Gaura Kaasa, Brittney Sakowski, Mike Kemp, Vanessa Sandahl, Chip Kieffaber, Jenny Schiapparasse, Angie Kloempken, Mackenzie Schnipkantit, Nathan Koehn, Andy Sink, Angie Kramapevsky, Christina Sisk, Ryan Kranz, Calla Stocker, Brian Krasny, Manaa Stoh, Gretchen Krusmark, Brianna Stolhanske, Nicole Kucera, Toria Strickland, Tyler 2-~ Student Judges - Burnsville High School General Election, November 7, 2006 Sullivan, Ben Swanson, Luke Sweeney, Megan TejPaul, Resha Todora, Elise Tweten, Kayla Vegedani, Maria Wagner, Jessica Walker, Andrew Weino, Matt Wilkes, Jenni Williams, Anne Wilson, Joe Woelfel, Brian Wong, Jordon Zimmerman, Jake zi Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting J. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (2007-2011) DAKOTA COUNTY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Dakota County's draft 5-year Transportation Capital Improvement Program for 2007-2011. FACTS: • At the May 9, 2006, Council workshop, the Council reviewed and discussed the proposed Public Works Department 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2007-2011. After consideration, the Council affirmed the draft CIP. • On June 6, the City Council approved the 5-year CIP as discussed at the May 9 Special Council Workshop, including improvements to County Highways that are important to the City of Eagan. Since the County and City share the cost of all County Highway improvements on a 55/45 split, a comparison of our requests to the County's current CIP were forwarded to the County for consideration in preparing their next CIP (2007-2011) • The Dakota County Transportation Department has now completed their draft 5-year CIP for 2007-2011 which is scheduled to be presented to the County Board for approval on November 28, 2006. • After reviewing Eagan's CIP, as well as their own County Transportation Plan, the County has included all of the County Highway improvements proposed by the City, such as major road upgrades, but doesn't reference specific signalized intersection or trail improvements. The County CIP includes funding for such minor improvements, but does not commit to individual project areas. • The County has now requested that the City formally approve the County's draft CIP for 2007-2011. City staff has reviewed it and found it in order for favorable Council consideration. ATTACHMENTS: • Comparison of City and County CIPs, page 5-yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Eagan (2007-2011) vs. County (2007-2011) September 27, 2006 NA=Not Addressed CIP IMPROVEMENTS Eagan's App'd Co. Proposed County's (2007-11 CIP) (2007-11 CIP) Cost Estimate ROADS 1. CSAH 28, Yankee Doodle Road (Promenade Ave to Lexington Ave) 2008 2009 $2,780,000 Upgrade to 6 Lanes w/ Intersection Modifications & Trails 2. CSAH 26, Lone Oak Road (TH 55 to Inver Grove Heights) 2011 2011 $2,667,000 Upgrade to Urban 4-Lane Divided w/ Trails SIGNALS / INTERSECTIONS 1.•CSAH 30, Diffley Road at Rahn Road 2007 2007 ROW $500,000 Intersection Reconfiguration/Traffic Control Upgrade 2008 Construct $630,000 2. CSAH 43, Lexington Avenue at Northview Park Road 2007 Future $300,000 New Traffic Signal Installation 3. CSAH 32, Cliff Road at Thomas Lake Rd/Stonecliffe Drv 2007 Future $350,000 Intersection Reconfiguration & Traffic Signal Modification 4. CSAH 30, Diffley Road at Blackhawk Road 2007 2008 $300,000 Intersection Reconfiguration (NB Right-turn) & Traffic Signal Modification 5. CSAH 28, Yankee Doodle Road at TH 13 2008 NA $0 Traffic Signal Modification (SW Signal Pole) 6. CSAH 30, Diffley Road at Nicols Road 2010 Future $500,000 Intersection Reconfiguration & Traffic Signal Modification 7. CSAH 32, Cliff Road at Nicols Road 2010 2010 $700,000 Intersection Reconfiguration & Traffic Signal Modification TRAILS 1. CSAH 30, Diffley Road (Rahn Road to Blackhawk Road) 2007 2008 $100,000 New - North Side 5 Year Total $8,827,000 Agenda Information Memo Eagan City Council Meeting October 3, 2006 K. APPROVE AMENDMENT OF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT POLICY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve an Amendment of the City's policy related to Housing Improvement Districts to require replacement reserve studies meet Community Associations Institute's National Reserve Study standards and be performed by certified CAI reserve specialists. FACTS: ➢ The City of Eagan adopted its Housing Improvement District Policy on September 20, 2005. ➢ One of the requirements of the state statute authorizing such policies is that an applicant prepare and submit third party replacement reserve study to outline the planned improvements, demonstrate the capacity of the association to pay for the improvements over time and to permit the City's financial consultants to perform an analysis of the information and advise the City on its sufficiency for the formation of a district. The City's policy reiterates that requirement. ➢ In applying the policy to the early applications the City has received for such districts, staff determined that the Community Associations Institute is the recognized authority for standardized replacement reserve studies and that the CAI also certifies professionals for the completion of such studies. In order to provide clarity for future applications, staff requested authorization to prepare an amendment of the City's policy to incorporate requirements that studies be performed by CAI certified reserve specialists, to CAI Reserve Study Standards. ➢ At its meeting of August 15, 2006, the Council authorized that amendment to be prepared. It is in order to be considered at this time. The proposed changes are clarifications and are believed to be housekeeping in nature. If the Council identifies issues that require more detailed consideration, the item can be pulled for separate discussion. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Policy Amendment on pages 31 through3~). CITY OF EAGAN HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA POLICY September, 20%, Deleted: 20 Dekftd: s I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish the City's position relating to the use of Housing hnprovement Area (HIA) financing for private housing improvements. This policy shall be used as a guide in processing and reviewing applications requesting HIA financing. The City shall have the option of amending or waiving sections of this policy when determined necessary or appropriate. II. POLICY It is the policy of the City of Eagan to use HIA financing to assist private property owners only in those circumstances in which the proposed private projects address one or more of the following goals: A- To promote neighborhood stabilization and revitalization by the removal of blight and/or the upgrading of the existing housing stock in the neighborhood. B. To correct housing or building code violations as identified by the City Code Enforcement Staff. C. To maintain or obtain FHA mortgage eligibility for a particular condominium or townhome association or single family home within the designated HIA. D. To increase or prevent the loss of the tax base of the City in order to ensure the long-term ability of the City to provide adequate services for its residents. E. To stabilize or increase the owner-occupancy level within a neighborhood or association. F. To meet other uses of public policy, as adopted by the City of Eagan from time to time, including promotion of quality urban design, quality architectural design, energy conservation, decreasing the capital and operating costs of local government, etc. M. PROCEDURE In order to be eligible for HIA financing through the City of Eagan the association is to submit an application along with application fee as set from time to time by resolution of the City Council. All HIA financed through the City of Eagan should meet the following minimum approved criteria. However, it should not be presumed that a project meeting these criteria would automatically be approved. Meeting these criteria creates no contractual rights on the part of any association. 31 A. The project must be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances, or required changes to the Plan and Ordinances must be under active consideration by the City at the time of approval. B. The HIA financing shall be provided within applicable state legislative restrictions, debt limit guidelines, and other appropriate financial requirements and policies. C. The project should meet one or more of the goals stated in the Policy section of this document. D. The term of the HIA should be the shortest term possible while still making the annual fee affordable to the association members. The term of any bonds or other debt incurred for the area should mature in 20 years or less. E. The association in a HIA should provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure repayment of the HIA financing and the performance of the administrative requirements of the development agreement. Financial guarantees may include, but are not limited to the pledge of the association's assets including reserves, operating funds and/or property. F. The proposed project, including the use of HIA financing, should be supported by a majority (51%) of the owners within the association. The association should include the results of a membership vote along with petitions that indicate a 51 % owner support to create the area. G. The association must have adopted a financial plan that provides for the association to finance maintenance and operation of the common elements within the association and a long-range plan to conduct and finance capital improvements therein, which does not rely on the subsequent use of the HIA tool. The financial plan must be prepared by an independent third party, with designation as a CAI certified reserve specialist, and must conform to CAI Reserve Study Standards. H. HIA financial assistance is a last resort financing and should not be provided to projects that have the financial feasibility to proceed without the benefit of HIA financing. Evidence that the association has sought other financing for the project should be provided and should include an explanation and verification that an assessment by the association is not feasible along from letters from private lenders or other evidence indicating lack of financing options. 1. The homeowner's association must be willing to enter into a development agreement, which may include, but is not limited to, the following terms: a. Establishment of a reserve fund b. Staffing requirements c. Annual reporting requirements d. Conditions of disbursement e. Required dues increases f. Notification to new owners of levied fees I The improvements financed through the HIA should primarily be exterior improvements and other improvements integral to the operation of the project, e.g. boilers. In the case of a homeowner's association, the improvements should be restricted to common areas. The improvements must be of a permanent nature. The association must have a third party conduct a facility needs assessment to determine and prioritize the scope of improvements. K. HIA financing should not be provided to those projects that fail to meet good public policy criteria as determined by the City Council, including: poor project quality; projects that are not in accord with the Comprehensive Plan, zoning, redevelopment plans and the City policies; projects that provide no significant improvement to the neighborhood and/or the City; and projects that do not provide a significant increase in the tax base and/or prevent the loss of tax base. L. The City Council reserves the right to deny funding for specific improvements if they are determined not to be in keeping with the intent of the policy. M. The financial structure of the project should receive a favorable review by the City's Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel. The review will include a review of performance and level of outstanding debt of previous HIM. N. The average market value of units in the association should not exceed the maximum home purchase price for existing homes under the State's first time homebuyer program. IV. RESPONSIBILITY The Community Development Department shall have primary responsibility for implementation and coordination of this policy. V. AUTHORITY The City of Eagan has the authority to establish IRAs under 1994 Minnesota laws, Chapter 587, Article 9, Section 22 through 31, and extended in 2005, M.S. 428A.21 Within the HIA, the City has the authority to: A. Make housing improvements B. Levy fees and assessments C. Issue bonds to pay for improvements The City Council has the authority to review each IRA application which includes scope of improvements, association's finances, long-term financial plan, and at least 51% membership support. Date of Approval: Signed: Pat Geagan, Mayor 315 Agenda Information Memo Eagan City Council Meeting Consent Agenda October 3, 2006 L. AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF SHORT TERM LEASE FOR ARMFUL OF LOVE PROGRAM AT CEDARVALE MALL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the preparation of short term lease agreement for Community Action Council - Armful of Love Program at Cedarvale Mall. FACTS: ➢ The City of Eagan purchased the Cedarvale Mall on September 1, 2006. A number of the businesses in the mall have relocated to their new sites and space is vacant at the mall. ➢ While the City does not intend to release the property for general use, it has received a request from the Community Action Council to house its annual Armful of Love gift donation program in one of the vacant spaces. The space would be required from late October through the Christmas holiday. ➢ Staff is asking for Council consideration of this short term use of the former ISD 191 space through the preparation of a short term lease that would cover basic costs and provide for liability insurance by the CAC. Approval of the lease would be considered by the Council at its meeting of October 17, but authorization at this time would permit the CAC to begin formalizing its plans and communications regarding the location of the program for the upcoming holiday season. ATTACHMENTS: None. Agenda Memo October 3, 2006 City Council Meeting M. AWARD CONTRACT TO HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSALLING ADDITIONAL ENERGY SAVING EQUIPMENT AT THE EAGAN CIVIC ARENA AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ADJUST THE APPROVED 2007 BUDGET. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Award a contract to Harris Contracting Company to install additional energy saving equipment at the Eagan Civic Arena, authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate documents and adjust the approved 2007 budget. FACTS: • In 2005 an energy audit was completed by Harris Companies in conjunction with Dakota Electric and Aquila Natural Gas Services to review the efficiency of equipment at the Civic Arena. • The audit was designed to identify ways in which the City of Eagan could make improvements to the building, change operations or procedures to improve the energy efficiency, and to save dollars by reducing operating costs. • Three projects were approved by the Council for implementation and inclusion in the 2006 budget to capture the benefits of the energy audit and take advantage of multiple rebates offered by the utility companies. • As part of the 2007 budget review the Council was made aware of the need to replace the hot water heaters in the Civic Arena. The equipment (originally scheduled to be replaced in 2005) was included in the 2007 budget with at a projected expenditure of $6,000. • The 2007 budget narrative noted that Harris Companies was completing an analysis relating to the proposed replacement of the water heaters which would reveal more detailed costs, any potential rebates and guaranteed paybacks. • Harris' analysis suggests installing a new domestic hot water system that would: o Allow heat exchangers to convert heat in a closed loop to extend the life of the equipment. o Provide a life expectancy of 20 years. o Allow the fill time for Zambonis to be''/z the time currently needed. o Allow 24 square feet of empty space in the west mechanical room. o Provide 94% efficiency versus existing system, at 88% with 30% heat loss from storage drum. o Be eligible for up to $3,000 in rebates. o Would provide a guaranteed pay-back on investment of 4 years or less. • The cost for a proposed domestic hot water system integrated into the main heating plan with funding consideration is: o Cost for new domestic hot wafer system: $30,000 0 2007 approved budget expenditure to replace hot water heaters ( 6,000) • The total cost for the domestic hot water system identified above will be $30,000. The total rebates offered will be up to $3,000 for a net cost of $27,000. • Of the $27,000, $6,000 was budgeted in 2007 under renewal and replacement to replace the hot water heaters. The balance of the expenditures is proposed to be funded through retained earnings. • There may additional cost savings of up to $2,000 if this project is completed in conjunction with the previously approved boiler and lighting projects. • The addition of this improvement will certainly enhance the operation of the buildings as they currently exist and would remain beneficial if any expansion to the facility would be considered in the near future. • Harris Companies will monitor all of the energy efficiency improvements to ensure the City of Eagan is achieving the cost savings projected and guaranteed. ATTACIUVIENTS: • Project proposal on pages37 through ~I Page ZIA - yam:.... A L1NC Service ® Contractor PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS Proposal Date Proposal Number Agreement No. Sep 06, 2006 P6P00726 BY AND BETWEEN: Harris Companies Eagan Civic Arena 909 Montreal Circle AND 3870 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 St Paul, MN 55102 hereinafter CONTRACTOR hereinafter CUSTOMER SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION(S): CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TO CUSTOMER : Complete Domestic Hot Water System. This New System will be integrated into the existing hot water process plant that supplies the Wash water, the Zamboni's, and the heat for the ice rink and Comfort heating coils in the building. The project Scope includes: 1. Increasing size of New Boiler (purchase in Energy Contract) from 750 to 900 2. Adding a 2nd Boiler of 900,000 BTU's 3. Reusing pumps in system and adding additional pumps 4. Add Four Heat Exchangers (4) to system 5. Demo of old Water Heaters in West Arena 6. Integrate piping from West Domestic Boiler area to Heat plant off East Arena Continued on next page As a condition of performance, payments are to be made on a progress basis. Invoice payment must be made within (10) days of receipt. Any alteration or deviation from the above proposal involving extra cost of material or labor will become an extra charge over the sum stated above. This proposal will become a binding Agreement only after acceptance by Customer and approved by an officer of Contractor as evidenced by their signatures below. This agreement sets forth all of the terms and conditions binding upon the parties hereto; and no person has authority to make any claim, representation, promise or condition on behalf of Contractor which is not expressed herein. CONTRACTOR CUSTOMER Signature (Sales epresentatWe Michelle Kuss Signature (AuthDrized Representative) Approved for Contractor: Mark Vaughn Signature Name it a Title to ate Harris Companies 3`7 :i 4 ZINC Service' Contractor PROJECT AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Customer shall permit Contractor free and timely access to areas and equipment, and allow Contractor to start and stop the equipment as necessary to perform required services. All planned work under this Agreement will be performed during the Contractor's normal working hours. 2. Contractor warrants that the workmanship hereunder shall be free from defects for thirty (30) days from date of installation. If any replacement part or item of equipment proves defective, Contractor will extend to Customer the benefits of any warranty Contractor has received from the manufacturer. Removal and reinstallation of any equipment or materials repaired or replaced under a manufacturer's warranty will be at Customer's expense and at the rates in effect. 3. Customer will promptly pay invoices within ten (10) days of receipt. Should a payment become thirty (30) days or more delinquent, Contractor may stop all work under this Agreement without notice and/or cancel this Agreement, and the entire Agreement amount shall become due and payable immediately upon demand. 4. Customer shall be responsible for all taxes applicable to the services and/or materials hereunder. 5. Any alteration to, or deviation from, this Agreement involving extra work, cost of materials or labor will become an extra charge (fixed price amount to be negotiated or on a time-and-material basis at Contractor's rates then in effect) over the sum stated in this Agreement. 6. In the event Contractor must commence legal action in order to recover any amount payable or owed to Contractor under this Agreement, Customer shall pay Contractor all court costs and attorneys' fees incurred by Contractor. 7. Any legal action against the Contractor relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be commenced within one (1) year from the date of the work. 8. Contractor shall not be liable for any delay, loss, damage or detention caused by unavailability of machinery, equipment or materials, delay of carriers, strikes, including those by Contractor's employees, lockouts, civil or military authority, priority regulations, insurrection or riot, action of the elements, forces of nature, or by any cause beyond its control. 9. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Customer shall indemnify and hold harmless Contractor, its agent and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including but not limited to attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance of work hereunder, provided that such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by an active or passive act or omission of Customer, anyone directly or indirectly employed by Customer, or anyone for whose acts Customer may be liable, regardless of whether it is caused in party by the negligence of Contractor. 10. Customer shall make available to Contractor's personnel all pertinent Material Safety Data Sheets (MSOS) pursuant to OSHA'S Hazard Communication Standard Regulations. 11. Contractor's obligation under this proposal and any subsequent contract does not include the identification, abatement or removal of asbestos or any other toxic or hazardous substances, hazardous wastes or hazardous materials, or any fungus(es) or spore(s); substance, vapor or gas produced by or arising out of any fungus(es) or spore(s); or any material, product, building component or structure that contains, harbors, nurtures or acts as a medium for any fungus(es) or spore(s). In the event such substances, wastes and materials are encountered, Contractor's sole obligation will be to notify the Owner of their existence. Contractor shall have the right thereafter to suspend its work until such substances, wastes or materials and the resultant hazards are removed. The time for completion of the work shall be extended to the extent caused by the suspension and the contract price equitably adjusted. Contractor expressly disclaims any and all responsibility and liability for the indoor air quality of the customer's facility, including without limitation, injury or illness to occupants of the facility or third parties, or any damage to the customer's facility, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's work under this agreement, including without limitation any illness, injury, or damage resulting in any manner from any fungus(es) or spore(s), any substance, vapor or gas produced by or arising out of any fungus(es) or spore(s), or any material, product, building component or structure that contains, harbors, nurtures or acts as a medium for any fungus(es) or spore(s). 12. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, WHETHER ARISING IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), EQUITY OR OTHERWISE, WILL CONTRACTOR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF PROFIT, INCREASED OPERATING OR MAINTENANCE EXPENSES, CLAIMS OF CUSTOMER'S TENANTS OR CLIENTS, OR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. Harris Companies Page _`.A LILAC Service ® Contractor SUPPLEMENT TO PROJECT AGREEMENT PAGE 1 PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS Agreement No. Proposal Date Proposal Number Sep 06, 2006 P6P00726 CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TO CUSTOMER (continued): 7. Reusing two existing tanks 8. Additional Glycol to fill to required level 9. Necessary Control Valves 10. Venting of 2nd Boiler 11. Building a closed loop in Heating system w/ Expansion tank and air separator 12. Re-use and or add RPZ's as necessary 13. Labor for installation of Closed loop system 14. Prints showing changes to system, and drawings of new system Not Included: Over Time Labor Asbestosis Removal Features of New System A. You will always have redundancy for all hot water uses B. Your system for Domestic Hot Water is now heated Indirectly. You will not have the same conditions like premature Hot Water Heater life, and safety concerns. C. Your system will be a closed loop heating system with expansion tank and Air Separator, whereby air that exists in an open system (like you have now) will not deteriorate the heat exchangers. Your boiler now will have a normal life of 15-20 years. By replacing a Boiler for Boiler now, without changing the engineering of the system would not eliminate the culprit of reducing the 'life expectancy' of the system. D. The new system reduces your fill time from 30 minutes to 15 minutes! Eight Re-surfacing rounds on both area's is 8*2*15 (minutes saved)=240 minutes. 240 minutes / 60 minutes in an hour is 4 hours saved per day in labor! E. You have Open Space in the West Arena where Domestic Heating Equip. was! THE SERVICES ABOVE ARE GOVERNED BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROGRAM OF WHICH THIS SUPPLEMENT IS A PART. Harris Companies 3~i N 7, ,y A LINC Service® Contractor SUPPLEMENT TO PROJECT AGREEMENT PAGE 1 PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS Proposal Date Proposal Number Agreement No. Sep 06, 2006 P6P00726 CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TO CUSTOMER (continued): Cost of New Domestic Hot Water system integrated into main Heating plant is: Thirty Thousand dollars and no/XX ..........................................$30,000.00 Deducts will be given on a T&M basis for efficiency gains of completing the jobs at the same time, as they are dependent upon one another. Deducts for Efficiency gain will be measured during piping. They could be as much as $1,000-3,000.00. Rebate for Domestic Hot Water System is $2,000.00--3,000.00. THE SERVICES ABOVE ARE GOVERNED BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROGRAM OF WHICH THIS SUPPLEMENT IS A PART. Harris Companies - ~ ark Jes A L/NC Service ® Contractor SUPPLEMENT TO PROJECT AGREEMENT PAGE 1 PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS Proposal Date Proposal Number Agreement NO. Sep 06, 2006 P6P00726 CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TO CUSTOMER (continued): THE SERVICES ABOVE ARE GOVERNED BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROGRAM OF WHICH THIS SUPPLEMENT IS A PART. Harris Companies A LILAC Service ® Contractor Recommended Solutions Worksheet (Contractor) will provide for the complete Q Design/Engineering and 0 Installation r❑ Replacement Modification Q Retrofit/Repair of the following environmental system(s): Location: Eagan Civic Arena West Arena Domestic Hot Water plant, and the main boiler Roon Component(s): Specifications: Installation of a closed loop system in the Hot Water Plant. Heat Exchangers will be used, in lieu of open tanks and direct fire in line with water heating. Included in this proposal we have provided for the following: Complete engineering and updating of drawings Insulation r Complete project management Concrete Pad r Delivery of all equipment to your facility Roof Sealing ~r complete installation of the above system(s) r Equipment Disposal Final Adjustment and Calibrations One (1) year warranty on parts, material and labor Systems training program Preventive maintenance agreement Consideration for your long-term facility investment plan We have not included: r Cutting, patching, painting Electrical wiring r Concrete Pad Setting of valve bodies or wells r Roof Sealing Air balancing v Asbestos Removal r Setting of dampers ~r Preventive maintenance agreement r Any work not specifically stated in this proposal When completed this program will provide your organization with: V Reduced operating expenses v Reduced legal exposure Investment protection r Peace of mind Improved comfort conditions Improved Indoor Air Quality Improved environmental control Harris Companies Agenda Memo October 3, 2006 City Council Meeting N. ACCEPT DONATION OF PERENNIAL PLANT(S) TO BE PLACED IN CENTRAL PARK. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Accept a donation of $200 to be used to place perennial plants or a tree in Central Park. FACTS: • The City Council formalized a donation policy and gift book to allow for the donation of specific items that people might consider to be incorporated within City of Eagan parks. • The Parks and Recreation office was approached to see how a work group might be able to donate perennial plants or a tree in memory of an Eagan resident's family member. • The donation of $200 was identified with a request for the plant(s) to be placed somewhere within Central Park. • Forestry Supervisor Hove will identify an appropriate location and plant species that will enhance the overall character of Central Park. • Upon acceptance of the donation by the City Council, Supervisor Hove will make arrangements for the purchase and installation of the plant(s) in accordance with the donor's gift. ATTACHMENTS: • None Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting 0. TOBACCO LICENSE FOR JACQUE JOHNSON EAGAN CITGO - 4205 NICHOLS ROAD ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a tobacco license for Jacque Johnson, selling under the name of Eagan Citgo at 4205 Nichols Road, Eagan. FACTS: • Jacque J. Johnson has applied for a license to sell tobacco products at 4205 Nichols Road under the name of Eagan Citgo • All requirements of the application have been met and fees have been paid • The Police Department has reviewed the application and sees no reason to deny ATTACHMENTS: (0) (The application is available for review in the Administration Department.) 44 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting P. TOBACCO LICENSE FOR KAKU INVESTMENTS, INC. GO FOR IT GAS - 4206 NICHOLS ROAD ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a tobacco license for Kaku Investments, Inc., selling under the name of Go For It Gas at 4206 Nichols Road, Eagan, subject to approval by the Police Department. FACTS: • Mr. Osman Musani has applied for a license to sell tobacco products at 4206 Nichols Road under the name of Go For It Gas • All requirements of the application have been met and fees have been paid • The Police Department is in the process of reviewing the application ATTACHMENTS: (0) (The application is available for review in the Administration Department.) i Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting A. PROJECT 932, WHISPERING WOODS ADDITIONS/ SLATER ACRES/ SLATER ROAD STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 932 (Whispering Woods Additions/ Slater Acres/ Slater Road - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 932 provided for the bituminous overlay of the streets within the Whispering Woods Additions/ Slater Acres, and Slater Road. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 5, 2006, with a public hearing scheduled for October 3 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is about 10% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 20, 2005. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. One written objection has been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 28 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 154 parcels (70 R-1 Single-Family, 65 Townhomes, 1 City Park, and 18 Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, one resident representing two properties attended the meeting. • The resident objects to the assessment of his two parcels (10-03100-012-51 & 10- 69200-090-00) as two single-family lot equivalents because there is only one house (2275 James Street) located on the two properties. Both lots are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy, which provides for the special assessment of lot equivalents. ATTACHMENTS: Ra • Final Assessment Report, pages~~ through _V • Resident Objection Letter, page FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES Number: Project 932 Assessment: October 3, 2006 Name: Slater Road/ Whispering Woods/ Slater Acres/ Project Approval Date: December 20, 2005 Oak Cliff Ponds Additions Mill & Overlay Final Feasibility Final Feasibility Rate Report Units Rate Report Units SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral B Surfacing/ Signs Direct Access Single Family $581.79 $657 / Lot Neighborhood Park $7.17 6.99 / f.f. Comm & Indust $14.34 16.23 f.f. Indirect Access Single Family $103.56 $117 / Lot Comm & Indust $100.40 $113 / Lot ❑ Service ❑ Multi Family Equiv. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ WAC 0 Driveway $0 $11,470 each None Constructed OTHER STREET LIGHTS ❑ Service Pair ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge Contract Number of Interest Amount City Number Parcels Terms Rate Assessed Financed 06-03 154 5 Years 5.50% $104,490 F.R. $209,690 F.R. $83,069.27 $180,769.93 (F.R. = Feasibility Report) Nfe~o City of ETo: Mayor and City Council From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer Date: September 18, 2006 Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 932 Slater Road/ Whispering Woods/ Slater Acres/ Oak Cliff Ponds Additions - Street Overlay At the public hearing on December 20, 2005, the City Council ordered Project 932, and in accordance with the feasibility report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for numerous streets within the Slater Road/ Whispering Woods/ Slater Acres/ Oak Cliff Ponds Additions neighborhood, and replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets as needed. In the feasibility report,-it was proposed to assess 50% of the street overlay and signage improvements in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The improvements were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for Project 932. 1. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $197,772.81 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($4,680.82) by City forces. Other costs including engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $66,066.39 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $263,839.20. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTS IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COST REPORT Street Resurfacing/ Sign Replace $151,004.50 $50,443.35 $201,447.85 $227,910 Curb & Gutter Repair 46,768.31 15,623.04 62,391.35 $86,270 Totals $197,772.81 $66,066.39 $263,839.20 $314,180 H. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. 1 B. STREET EWPROVEMENTS The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices and quantities: 1. 32' Wide Bituminous Street Overlay UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $200.00 $200.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 5952 1.32 7,856.64 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 775 1.50 1,162.50 Wear Course Mixture Ton 1421.85 38.10 54,172.31 Traffic control L. S. 1 630.00 630.00 Adjust water valve box - riser Each 4 75.00 300.00 Repair gate valve top Each 2 143.00 286.00 Adjust manhole frame & casting Each 3 295.00 885.00 Adjust manhole casting - riser Each 6 118.13 708.78 Remove & Replace manhole casting Each 2 530.00 1,060.00 Traffic signs L.S. 1 4,680.82 4,680.82 SUBTOTAL $71,942.05 Other costs @33.41% 24,035.84 Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $95,977.89 2. 44' Wide Bituminous Street Overlay -Slater Road UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $1,430.00 $ 1,430.00 Mill Bituminous Surface S.Y. 4910 1.21 5,941.10 Wearing Course Mix Ton 1902.73 34.40 65,453.91 Bit Material for Tack Coat Gal 1050 1.50 1,575.00 Adjust Water Valve Box Each 0 75.00 0.00 Repair Gate Valve Top Each 0 143.00 0.00 Repair Gate Valve Mid Each 0 200.00 0.00 Adjust MH Frame & Casting Each 1 295.00 295.00 Remove & Replace MH Casting Each 1 530.00 530.00 Adjust MH Casting Each 2 128.00 256.00 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy L.F. 7140 0.19 1,356.60 12" Solid Line White - Epoxy L.F. 20 7.35 147.00 4" Double Solid Line Yellow-Epoxy L.F. 3536 0.40 1,414.40 Zebra Crosswalk White - Epoxy S.Y. 32 1.05 33.60 Traffic Control L.S. 1 630.00 630.00 2 SUBTOTAL $79,062.45 Other costs *33.41% 26,414.76 Mill & Overlay Cost $105,477.21 C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of low-density residential, commercial and offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows: 1. LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION RATIO IMPROVEMENT COSTS PROPORTIONAL COSTS 32 Foot Wide 1/1 $95,977.89 $95,977.89 44 Foot Wide 32/44 $105,477.21 $76,710.70 $172,688.59 IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST 32' EQUIVALENT PORTION RESIDENTIAL $172,688.59 X 50% $86,344.29 a. Low-Density Residential Property with Direct Driveway Access The assessment rate was computed on a per lot basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT FRONTAGE % 6,625 F.F. 14,046 F.F. 47.2% ASSESSABLE COST TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY ASSESSMENT RATE RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT LOTS RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT $40,725.54 70 Lots $581.79/Lot b. Low-Density Residential Property with Indirect Driveway Access The assessment rate was computed on a per lot basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE RESIDENTIAL - INDIRECT RESIDENTIAL - INDIRECT FRONTAGE % 1,095 F.F. 14,046 F.F. 7.8% ASSESSABLE COST TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY ASSESSMENT RATE RESIDENTIAL - INDIRECT LOTS RESIDENTIAL - INDIRECT $6,731.24 65 Lots $103.56/Lot c. Neighborhood Park Property with Direct Driveway Access The assessment rate was computed on a frontage basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK NH PARK - DIRECT FRONTAGE % 780 F.F. 14,046 F.F. 5.6% ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSMENT RATE NH PARK - DIRECT NH PARK - DIRECT $5,593.58 $7.17/F.F. 2. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST C/I PROPERTY PORTION C/I PROPERTY $201,455.10 X 100% $201,455.10 a. CommerciaVIndustrial Property with Direct Driveway Access The assessment rate was computed on a frontage basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE C/I - DIRECT C/I - DIRECT FRONTAGE % 2,051 F.F. 14,046 F.F. 14.6% ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSMENT RATE C/I - DIRECT C/I - DIRECT $29,416.52 $14.34/F.F. b. Commercial/Industrial Property with Indirect Driveway Access The assessment rate was computed on a per lot basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSABLE COST C/I - INDIRECT C/I - DIRECT C/I - INDIRECT 42 F.F. $14.34/F.F. $602.39 TOTAL C/I - INDIRECT ASSESSMENT RATE LOTS C/I - INDIRECT 6 Lots $100.40/Lot D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance. ~I M. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY1 Street Resurfacing/ Signs $201,447.85 $83,069.27 ($118,378.58) Curb & Gutter Repair 62.391.35 (62.391.35) Total $263,839.20 $83,069.27 ($180,769.93) FUND AMOUNT Major Street Fund $180,769.93 cd~ Russ Matthys, P.E. Reviewed Reviewed 0171 Public rks Department Finance Deparh ent R - Z-7 -cX Dated Dated c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I 3 I CLIFF ROAD -12290 3333 fh~CC/ 9fOq~ 260 sfO9'f 900C/,~~ 22^~ W I I 4600 1/O A IL~I / ~y 42' F.F. 1 OAK CLIFF N ~/0 I` 7 th ADDITION o O - 9f"9~Q 2270 2280 Oti o m 9 • • • • • \ 4~a 1- • • 4640 !L m 'r• •I • .7 -L_... °>QP• • ~p~ WYNEW RE • Op • • i • . • ....,.f 4662 4666 / . ; • N~ I 4670 , • • • r• yF1 ~~l • i • 4674 4678 ` • y E 5T. ) PRN 4662 4686 e 7 7 7 cc; i off. Q "4770 i - 774 778 , 782 1 2223 1 i 4786 < 1 V\ O , 1 F,-147901 ASSESSMENT LEGEND - 5'C 004- of D SLATER OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT 224 ACRES PARK • $ 103.56 / Lot - Single Family - Indirect Access 780' F.F. JAMES ST. $ 581.79 /Lot - Single Family - Direct Access A $ 100.40 /Lot - Comm./Ind. - Indirect Access 1j4 2160 ' 355' $ 14.34 IF. F. - Comm./Ind. - Direct Access 2230 2196 2192 2198 C4 4803 O 780') $ 7.17 / F.F. - Neighborhood Park 7 4 00~ 5 0 ASSESSMENT AREA 4 4' 2s ii-i-aa Whispering Woods / Slater Acres / Slater Rd. City of EaAQ Assessment Map Engineering Department City Project 932 53 N *4782 1 4783 m 4782 ~ 786 1 ~ W E 1 ~G 1 m S 790 ~ '•C~ AMES OAK CLIFF m NO SCALE OUTLOT SLATER ACRES - PARK q I ~ 1 780' F.F.) 1 JAMES ST. 4797 ✓ x 2180 ~O * 2200 2196 2192 2188 2184 P J 4805* 4807 4803 4800 2215 F 809 Q 2225 2200 \ > HISPERING TR. 813 * aal* ~~oa a 2235 i *2210 2170 1 ~JS p0 2245 * 2220 2226 4816 `*~A~2 2255 g~4 * 2160 2230 265 4820 a 2 \ 4818 SLATER ACR 2150 * 2240 " 4824 * 2250 j 4847 82 2275 260° Q I Q o ° oM ~ SEASONS 4872 484 ~4so 1 4887~V * 2270 1 4859 488- Gi 1 4870 ' 4891 0 sf+T * * ~e s 9N ti9 * 4890 * 88 I 6O 4895 4894 ' Q 1_ Od 4893 -k g B9 * 220 199, _ _ 0 U r 7C 7C 1' 4863 4899 STOR ND-RD. 2195 2t~9 r. ASSESSMENT LEGEND * 1 2206 OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT _ CEDAR HEIGHTS ® 4909 • $103.56/Lot - Single Family - Indirect Access 4913 $581.79/Lot - Single Family -Direct Access MARY y V . A $ 100.40 / Lot - Comm./Ind. -Indirect Access 355' $ 14.34 / F.F. - Comm./Ind. -Direct Access ( 780') $ 7.17 / F.F. - Neighborhood Park ®.m Assessment Area 9-22-06 Whispering Woods / Slater Acres 1 Slater Rd. City of Ea~aIl Assessment Map Engineering Department City Project 932 5~ Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP932 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-03100-01 Section 31 $100.40 $113.00 $12.60 10-03100-01 Section 31 $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-03100-04 Section 31 $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-12450-01 Awad Addition $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-12450-02 Awad Addition $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-16725-01 Cedar Heights $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-16725-02 Cedar Heights $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-19875-01 Deer Rest Pond Addition $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-19875-02 Deer Rest Pond Addition $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-01 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-02 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-03 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-04 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-05 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-05 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-06 Oak Cliff $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-53550-07 Oak Cliff $5,592.60 $5,450.00 ($142.60) 10-53552-01 Oak Cliff 3rd $6,352.62 $7,190.00 $837.38 10-53555-01 Oak Cliff 6th Addition $2,595.54 $14,521.00 $11,925.46 10-53556-01 Oak Cliff 7th Addition $100.40 $113.00 $12.60 10-53557-01 Oak Cliff 8th Addition $100.40 $113.00 $12.60 10-53558-01 Oak Cliff 9th Addition $100.40 $113.00 $12.60 10-53558-02 Oak Cliff 9th Addition $4,459.74 $5,048.00 $588.26 10-53575-01 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-01 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-01 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-01 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-02 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-02. Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-02 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-02 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-03 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-03 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 55 Page 1 of 5 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP932 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-53575-03 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-03 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-04 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-04 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-04 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-04 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-05 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-05 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-05 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 1 D-53575-05 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-06 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-06 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-06 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-06 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-07 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-07 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-08 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-08 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-09 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-09 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-10 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-10 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-11 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-11 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-12 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-12 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-13 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-13 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-14 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-15 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-16 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53575-17 Oak Cliff Pond $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-01 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-01 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 ~A Page 2 of 5 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP932 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-53576-01 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $1144 10-53576-01 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-02 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 .$117.00 $13.44 10-53576-02 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add '$103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-02 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-03 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-03 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-03 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-04 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-04 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-04 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-05 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-05 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-05 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-06 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-06 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-07 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-07 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-08 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-09 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-53576-10 Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add $103.56 $117.00 $13.44 10-58650-01 Prairie Oaks $6,166.20 $6,979.00 $812.80 10-58650-02 Prairie Oaks $4,760.88 $5,388.00 $627.12 10-65870-01 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-65870-02 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-65870-03 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-65870-04 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-65870-05 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-65870-06 St Charles Wood $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-01 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-02 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-03 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-04 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-05 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 3 of 5 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP932 Proposed Pending PID Addition: Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-69200-06 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-09 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-10 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-11 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-12 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-13 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-14 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-69200-15 Slaters Acres $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83566-01 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83568-02 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83568-03 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83568-04 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83568-05 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83568-06 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-8356E-07 Wentworth Park $731.34 $828.00 $96.66 10-83950-01 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-02 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-03 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-04 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-05 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-06 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-07 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-08 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-09 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83950-10 Whispering Woods $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-01 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-02 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-03 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-04 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-05 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-06 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-07 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-08 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-09 . Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 4 of 5 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP932 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-83951-10 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-11 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-12 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-13 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-14 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83951-15 Whispering Woods Second $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83952-01 Whispering Woods Third $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83952-01 Whispering Woods Third $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83952-02 Whispering Woods Third $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83952-03 Whispering Woods Third $581.79. $657.00 $75.21 10-83955-01 Whispering Woods Sixth $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83955-01 Whispering Woods Sixth $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83955-03 Whispering Woods Sixth $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 10-83958-01 Whispering Woods Ninth $581.79 $657.00 $75.21 Summary for 'SA_Nbr = 1OP932 (149 detail records) Sum $81,159.89 $102,446.00 $21,288.11 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 5 of 5 City of Eagan Paul Heitzman 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. 2275 James Ct. Eagan, Minnesota Eagan, Mn. 55122 55122 651-890-2563 To: City Council Re: Project 932 Slater Acres Street Improvement Subject Letter of Objection concerning Assessment Dear Sirs: The final costs of this projectare in and are $582 for a single family lot with direct access and $104 for a lot with indirect access. My home is unique in that it is placed on a double lot with the property line going through the center of the home. Even though I have two lots, I cannot build on the second lot nor sell it to have another home built on that lot. The setting pretty much precludes that due to the setting of the home and the hilly terrain. Any change from the current single home status would require a re-platting of the property. I would of course like to pay only a single assessment for the recapping of the street, but I think it would be fair enough if I paid for a "direct access" fee for the portion of the home with the driveway, and have the second lot considered "indirect access" and be assessed the lower "indirect access" fee. This would make my fee $686 rather than the double assessment. y Your Pa e-Mi J n Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PROJECT 933, TOWN CENTRE DR/ O'LEARY LANE/ GOLFVIEW DR STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 933 (Town Centre Dr./ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview Drive - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 933 provided for the bituminous overlay of the 'streets within the Town Centre Dr./ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview Drive area. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 5, 2006, with a public hearing scheduled for October 3 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is about 10% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing January 17, 2006. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 28 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 253 parcels (227 Condos, 5 R4 High Density Residential, and 21 Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages 6Lthrough~. I I FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES Number: Project 933 Assessment: October 3, 2006 Name: Town Centre Drive/ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview Project Approval Date: January' 17, 2006 Drive Mill & Overlay Final Feasibility Final Feasibility Rate Report Units Rate Report' Units SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral 0 Surfacing/ Signs High Density Res $10.58 $13.00 / F.F. $86.68 $106 / Unit Comm & Indust 14.11 17.32 / F.F. ❑ Service ❑ Multi Family Equiv. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ WAC 0 Driveway $9,733.04 $8,610 / each OTHER STREET LIGHTS ❑ Service Pair ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge Contract Number of Interest Amount City Number Parcels Terms Rate Assessed Financed 06-02 253 5 Years 5.50% $208,450 F.R. $92,200 F.R. $182,218.50 $94,226.00 (F.R. = Feasibility Report) (OQ- e~o City of E To: Mayor and City Council From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer Date: September 19, 2006 Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 933 Town Centre Drive/ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview Drive - Street Overlay At the public hearing on January 17, 2006, the City Council ordered Project 933, and in accordan ce with the feasibility report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for Town Centre Drive, O'Leary Lane and Golfview Drive; replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets, as needed, and installation of commercial concrete driveway entrances. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 75% of the cost for the street overlay and signage improvements adjacent to high density residential properties and 100% of the cost for relevant improvements adjacent to commercial/industrial properties, all in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The improvements were completed under Contract 06-02. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for Project 933. 1. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $211,467.94 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($5,825.18) by City forces. Other costs including engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $64,976.56 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $276,444.50. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTS IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COST REPORT Street Resurfacing/ Sign Replace $138,979.85 $42,703.55 $181,683.40 $222,910 Curb & Gutter Repair 65,042.74 19,985.32 85,028.06 69,130 Concrete Driveway 7,445.35 2,287.69 9,733.04 8,610 Totals $211,467.94 $64,976.56 $276,444.50 $300,650 (p3 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Mill Bituminous Pavement SY 8,935 0.95 8,488.25 Wearing Course Mixture TON 2,665.10 38.95 103,805.57 Bit Material for Tack Coat GAL 1,300 2.00 2,600.00 Adjust Water Valve Box - Riser EA 17 85.00 1,445.00 Repair Gate Valve Top Sec EA 9 143.00 1,287.00 Repair Gate Valve Mid Sec EA 7 200.00 1,400.00 Adjust MH Frame & Casting EA 13 295.00 3,835.00 Remove & Rep Frame & Casting EA 1 500.00 500.00 Adjust MH Casting EA 26 140.00 3,640.00 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 4,232 0.19 804.08 4" Broken Line White - Epoxy LF 540 0.19 102.60 24" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 158 6.30 995.40 4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 4,433 0.38 1,684.54 Pavement Message Arrow - Left EA 10.5 105.00 1,102.50 Pavement Message Arrow - Right EA 10 105.00 1,050.00 Zebra Crosswalk White - Epoxy SY 846 3.15 2,664.90 Traffic Control LS 1 1,575.00 1,575.00 Traffic Signs LS 1 5,825.18 5,825.18 SUBTOTAL $138,979.84 Other costs @ 30.73% 42,545.03 Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $181,524.87 C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of high-density residential, commercial and offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows: 1. HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST H-D RESIDENTIAL PORTION H-D RESIDENTIAL $181,524.87 X 75% $136,143.65 a. High-Density Residential Property (Front Footage) The assessment rate was computed on a front foot basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT H-D RESIDENTIAL FRONTAGE % 5,321 F.F. 12,863 F.F. 41.4% ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSMENT RATE RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT RESIDENTIAL - DIRECT $56,318.15 $10.58/F.F. b. High-Density Residential Property (Tomark V & 2nd - Per Unit) The assessment rate was computed on a per unit basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSABLE COST TOMARK H-D RESIDENTIAL TOMARK 1,859 F.F. $10.58/F.F. $19,675.90 TOTAL ASSESSMENT RATE TOMARK UNITS TOMARK 227 Units $86.68/Lot 2. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST C/I PROPERTY PORTION C/I PROPERTY $181,524.87 X 100% $181,524.87 a. CommerciaVIndustrial Property The assessment rate was computed on a frontage basis. TOTAL FRONTAGE PROJECT FRONTAGE C/I FRONTAGE % C/I 7,542 F.F. 12,863 F.F. 58.6% ASSESSABLE COST ASSESSMENT RATE C/I C/I $106,434.00 $14.11/F.F. (jo5 b. Comm erciaVIndustrial Property with Driveway Entrance The assessment rate was computed at the full cost for the properties with the improved driveways. TOTAL COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSABLE COST DRIVEWAY COST C/I DRIVEWAY C/I DRIVEWAY $9,733.31 100% $9,733.31 D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance. M. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) HYIPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY1 Street Resurfacing/ Signs $181,683.40 $172,485.46 ($9,197.94) Curb & Gutter Repair 85,028.06 (85,028.06) Concrete Driveway 9,733.04 9,733.04 Total $276,444.50 $182,218.50 ($94,226.00) FUND AMOUNT Major Street Fund $94,226.00 T,- Russ Matthys, P.E. Reviewed Review d r i~ . P lic Works Department Finance De rhnent D(p Dated Dated c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I ~r T N ~rr N Y N 0 oZS N L~ U I ~ ~ Z 0 1 ~ 0 N II ea w 0 lL'b00'L O z I. o F - ,I w ~z .9 Y Op 3, Y LPL/ Z 0O J II II _ O Q N LL: PO O U- L O ~ O~ N Ca / I I ~ ~T ~ Q a (n I O Q U~ C> CD (a LL LL Z o i i Lq Q o co co zca Q O J 01 cn fR VT J , O N w w W U) } < co D co 3n`d NOiONIX31 W a a W 'o 0 0 ? > 80. Z a U. O p O Z Ww z Z a ~0/ ~LU a W w x x W x m ~~~IO C r U~ ~i~• Z I J UJ LL LL Z U O O J LU i t r iv • 1 ~ U I U a ~ ~ I Q o °o Co zzs x ,0~y/ ! ~0 0 0 i ~O ri I O .n O w ~ i Q r -9 277.49' F < t - w r `ys 365.91' - C ^ V --i H-L LL C) 00 L 32i N30 NMOJ 1 C Z O r O 0 O o r O Q ~ L--39 5 a G W "'off V N w _ LL Z +e,~o LL E r ' O ooi~I L U' I r ` o LL o 79- 1Ng~ry~- O 7 r W o ,I - - v N N O T -z / LU V eM~~~ I w U 5 z cdI' O - r n J g065~ 0 1 " i N "GE Nlp o 1 ~O E v PoN UQ 1 ° 17 13 1 dy1N3 NMI =1 W tD l 'O Q z p) oa U X: C) ~Z Z LL LL ❑ O o ! 1 LL LL- z ° ce) 6 e ~o° u,1 i c to LL rl.L v? 03 CO -j co - C c o a" 1 i w w w w rp Q O O p ° ~I O c a o 3 c ai ¢O ~~Oy I Z k' ` Z o 0 00 00 ? > J N z a Q° m Q U a~ '1 Q w W 0° w J C~ O W LL LL O T+ Q a, v< o o m CV) O 1, W (n ~ li U U > _ p w o Y a 1 1 aUi ZQ Q I Z I o 0 o U O C) 0 0. CL N N N ? w i • • 70 /128569 ,fro ek i i ~ 00 100 00 ~=20 - ~,00'L6Z~ Id 3AN`dl fo I z a Z z< N Oa b 6 WN NI 1m F -LU 4 +7~' 3~~~ N > 0 e yam/ Ij ~+-l 1 I~ cW 1 o X U~ lr Oro IN ~NaQ ° 0 N U o-w`_1 W ~Q r Z LU 11r oo zrn 1 z 1 C, w O 1° CD. .U IN " o 1 O 4 v • 1 r- b a i ~ c ~~blNN - C w 0 m a _ and >NdwN3a Y W v Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-22477-01 Eagan Senior Housing Add $8,464.00 $10,400.00 $1,936.00 10-22478-01 Eagan Senior Housing 2nd Addition $7,633.51 $9,419.00 $1,785.49 10-28900-01 Gatewoods Addition $10,850.59 $13,319.00 $2,468.41 10-28900-02 Gatewoods Addition $4,317.66 $5,300.00 $982.34 10-72850-01 Stuarts First Carriage Green Apartm $8,686.18 $10,673.00 $1,986.82 10-72851-01 Stuarts 2nd $6,855.84 $8,424.00 $1,568.16 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-00 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-01 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 r na Page 1 of 8 ~i'~ 1 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-02 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-03 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.$2 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-04 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-05 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 2 of 9 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-06 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-07 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-07 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-15 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-16 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 3 of 8 .71 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-17 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $1932 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-18 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $66.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-19 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-20 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 4 of 8 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-21 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-22 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-30 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-31 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 5 of 8 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-32 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-33 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-34 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-35 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 6 of 8 3q Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-36 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-37 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-76900-38 Tomark Carriage Hills Condos $86.68 $106.00 $19.32 10-77051-01 Town Centre 100 2nd $4,501.09 $5,525.00 $1,023.91 10-77051-02 Town Centre 100 2nd $7,265.31 $7,290.00 $24.69 10-77052-01 Town Centre 100 3rd $6,983.59 $7,478.00 $494.41 10-77054-01 Town Centre 100 5th Add $2,549.78 $3,133.00 $583.22 10-77054-02 Town Centre 100 5th Add $2,232.38 $2,743.00 $510.62 10-77055-02 Town Centre 100 6th $4,049.57 $4,997.00 $947.43 10-77055-03 Town Centre 100 6th $2,822.00 $3,482.00 $660.00 10-77055-04 Town Centre 100 6th $3,386.40 $4,170.00 $783.60 10-77055-04 Town Centre 100 6th $3,372.29 $4,170.00 $797.71 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5 Page 7 of 8 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP933 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-77057-01 Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon $1,555.26 $1,911.00 $355.74 10-77D57-02 Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon $2,105.42 $2,587.00 $481.58 10-77057-03 Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon $2,031.36 $2,496.00 $464.64 10-77057-04 Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon $2,147.74 $2,639.00 $491.26 10-77058-01 Town Centre 100 9th Add $3,174.75 $3,917.00 $742.25 10-77059-01 Town Centre 100 10th Add $3,668.60 $4,527.00 $858.40 10-77059-01 Town Centre 100 10th Add $3,668.60 $4,527.00 $858.40 10-77060-01 Town Centre 100 11th Add $1,425.11 $1,323.00 ($102.11) 10-77061-01 Town Centre 100 12th Add. $4,740.96 $5,850.00 $1,109.04 10-77063-01 Town Centre 100 14th Add $1,411.00 $1,306.00 ($105.00) 10-77065-01 Town Centre 100 16th Add $4,289.44 $5,293.00 $1,003.56 10-77066-01 Town Centre 100 17th Add $5,517.01 $6,807.00 $1,289.99 10-77067-01 Town Centre 100 18th Addition $7,083.22 $8,740.00 $1,656.78 10-77067-02 Town Centre 100 18th Addition $2,977.21 $3,674.00 $696.79 10-77068-01 Town Centre 100 19th Add $4,726.85 $5,832.00 $1,105.15 Summary for'SA_Nbt' = 10P933 (252 detail records) Sum $153,735.68 $185,484.00 $31,748.32 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 8 of 8 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting C. PROJECT 926, SADDLEHORN/ SUNSET / NORTHVIEW MEADOWS ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 926 (Saddlehorn/ Sunset Additions/ Northview Meadows - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 926 provided for the bituminous overlay of numerous streets within the Saddlehorn/ Sunset / Northview Meadows Additions, located south of Diffley Road and west of Dodd Road. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 5, 2006, with a public hearing scheduled for October 3 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is about 25% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 5, 2005. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 28 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 330 parcels (R-1 Single-Family) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: ~j • Final Assessment Report, pages IS through. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES Number: Project 926 Assessment: October 3, 2006 Name: Saddlehorn/ Sunset/ Northview Meadows Project Approval Date: December 5, 2005 Mill & Overlay Final Feasibility Final Feasibility Rate Report Units Rate Report Units SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral H Surfacing/ Signs 515.26 $680 / Lot ❑ Service ❑ Multi Family Equiv. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ Driveway OTHER STREET LIGHTS ❑ Service Pair ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge Contract Number of Interest Amount City Number Parcels Terms Rate Assessed Financed 06-02 330 5 Years 5.50% $22_4,480 F.R. $386,250 F.R. $170,036.14 $294,615.07 (F.R. Feasibility Report) 1 'Tor City of Eakan Me To: Mayor and City Council From: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer Date: September 20, 2006 Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 926 Saddlehorn/ Sunset/ Northview Meadows Street Overlay Improvements At the public hearing on December 5, 2005, the City Council ordered Project 926, and in accordance with the feasibility report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for numerous streets within the Saddlehorn/ Sunset/ Northview Meadows neighborhood, and replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 50% of the street overlay and signage improvements in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The improvements were completed under Contract 06-02. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for Project 926. 1. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $379,494.58 paid to the contractors for the construction of the improvements. Traffic and street signage was installed at a cost of $7,504.56. Other costs including engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $77,807.78 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $464,806.92. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTS IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COST REPORT Street Resurfacing/ Sign Replace $283,194.05 $56,878.22 $340,072.27 $448,970 Curb & Gutter Repair 103,805.09 20,929.56 124,734.65 $161,760 Totals $386,999.14 $77,807.78 $464,806.92 $610,730 l H. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 23,373 1.16 27,112.68 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 2,900 2.00 5,800.00 Wear Course Mixture Ton 5,522.76 39.37 217,431.06 Traffic control L. S. 1 1,260.00 1,260.00 Adjust water valve box - riser Each 25 85.00 2,125.00 Repair gate valve top Each 15 143.00 2,145.00 Repair gate valve mid section Each 4 200.00 800.00 Adjust manhole casting - complete Each 31 295.00 9,145.00 Adjust manhole casting - riser Each 52 140.00 7,280.00 4" Solid white line pvmt. marking L.F. 62 0.19 11.78 8" Solid white line pvmt. marking L.F. 142 0.38 53.96 24" Solid white line pvmt. marking L.F. 32.5 6.30 204.75 4" Double solid yellow line L.F. 152 0.38 57.76 Pavement message - Rt/ Thru Each 1 157.50 157.50 Pavement message - Lt Each 1 105.00 105.00 Traffic signs L.S. 1 7,504.56 7,504.56 SUBTOTAL $283,194.05 Other costs @20.1% 56,878.22 Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $340,072.27 C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES All assessable properties within the project area are low-density residential. The improvement and assessment rates for low-density residential properly are computed as follows: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $340,072.27 330 Lots $1,030.53/Lot IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $1,030.53/ Lot X 50% $515.26/Lot 2 D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE RESPONSIBILITY Street Resurfacing/ Signs $340,072.27 $170,036.14 ($170,036.14) Curb & Gutter Repair 124,578.93 (124,578.93) Total $464,806.92 $170,036.14 ($294,615.07) John Gor , P.E. Reviewed Reviewe Public Works Department Finance partment CT - 2 C. 47 Dated Dated c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I 3 ~1 I I / I / / ! I \ \ I DIFFLEY ROAD CC) N 4202 207 439 38 38 4201 421D N cli CU N n ti b 4201 4213 V TO N A • 220 v t ry 4203 420 4210 1 • O 0 M 4204 209 4219 4205 I a 4209 O • 4210 4217 4209 216 • / 4240 790 4225 4222 4364 4213 N N N y • 421 4216 223 22 4217 v v a v 4237 4244 • 4231 4223 ui) 229 4230 4226 4358 224 • ® 4241 4246 4233 4236 4234 4245 • 23 4235 07 795 4237 4352 . T -+24 2 4235 4242 8 7 4240 4249 11 4240 • • • 4243 43 4346 CE 4253 4252 4251 • 4248 4247 248 O K O 249 4. 6P 14340 l iC O 4257 0-1 . 4261 259 &9- • 799 11* NSF I 426D• 4261 W1 1; - 83 8 4 82 81 8] 794 7 •90 786 782 7 4264 263 4269 4264 • 272 427 4 27l 276 796 • 797 O(~ 4268 26 • • • 4273 4~7AlIAC RE 0795 791 U9 785 T 1 4272 •427 794 • 4277 4275 4281 4276 279 4280 792 • •793 4285 278 4277 • • 4284 • • 489 4282 4283 4282 4285 790 • 84 782 DR. 4288 4289 788 786 4286 42^7 4284 4293 4292 4290 859 4286 4297 • 42961 ra 10D 55 863 G\ 849 4301 4305 4304 HACK ORE 751✓y 850 a a i 4309 • 856 'N w 4306 86D ~'S r 790 HACKMORE \ P9 i 10 825 819 3 G.S ON 611 807 sos • 4314 GO D 803 750 A X\ • 821 ~ i - • ~ N 328 24 839 829 82 0 / i \ 1\ 332 647 s / • / 4336 853 • ~ 824 812 • ~j~ 85 • ' ` \ ~ y ~ ~ BID OB • • 82 06 804 865 I y/ 83 83 80 • 864 856 853 798 MWE ® 796 SC14WANZ LAKE LEGEND W E `JINGSTON S • $ 515.26 per Lot Assessment NO SCALE Street /~C~ Assessment nts Area G:Project and Contract Info\0926-Saddlehorn Sunset\Grophic5\AssessmentMap2A 9-11Am~ -06 / Sunset / Northview Meadows City of Eap Street Improvements / Assessment Area Fig. 2A Engineering Department Project 926 -82.- 1 1 DIFFLEY ROAD - .00 em on sm M Em M = an mm 12 4213 207 201 39 38 383 4377 1 Y TO N l0 4219 4371 ?18 1 790 4225 4222 4364 0365 M 224® a O 670 O I 1 -1 _X 4228 4358 • •4359 4 4 8239 .230•® 4231 • 236 795 4237 4234 4352 • 4353 4 0 3 V 803 799 4347 .242 • 4243 • 4240 4346 • Z) 424r. 4245 • 6 48 O K 01 ry 249 4246, P 4340 E 4341 765 • 711 ?0 .t' : C 4250 ~ ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 42 798 799 • • • 255 25~ 4250 35 4254 755 745 794 790 786 782 778 774 • 251 F61" 774 261 259 • • • 6 796,i 797 • • 775 • 4260 • 765 •795 791 789 785 781 • • 267 L 25 • U • .7 776 4266 278 7940 11 •793 • 776 • 267 z • • • 280 792 • DR • 273 J4272 27 4270• L • • 736 4275 264 • 781 ¢ 756 746 ?88 790 • 84 782 4279 • 4278 4280 • • 788 7B6 C ?92 ® ® ® 4285 4284 • • • • ® 753 743 733 M013 429 ® 4291 4290 773 • 763 H 29 ® ® ® 11 ® ® l • Ul+ HACK ORE 7 DR. 430• 4304 4310 • • • 4302 746 740 730 720 790 HACKMORE 4307• •4308 4311 • ® ® Q • 4312 - 04312 Q 619 • 807 4311 • 1 811 • • 805 4315 4316 ' VI GO 4321N O Q • 803 4322 1 Ark ~ LL F 120 ` • 750 • 4319 4320 331 VJ 4332 C • • 624 • • 4325 4324 4341 812 801 4341 F-4342 •4342 -1 610 808 \ 806 604 OO• • 731 802 789 4351 • 745 735 • \ 787 785 4352 435 4352 • • • t 800 • _ 779 \ 769 • •4362 798 • • 4362 RD11 • 796 11 1 794 0 782 774 772 736 732 766 760 754 . ~ c('.HW~'NZ 792 746 LAKE ~ 776 , ■ all N AKE r ® ® - 1 LEGEND W E am S NO SCALE • $ 515.26 per Lot Assessment Street Improvments G:Feosibility Reports2006\Proj926 Sad dlehorn_Sunset\Streetlmprov mmmm Assessment Area Saddlehorn / Sunset / Northview Meadows City 0~~~na Street Improvements - Assessmen Map Fig. 2B Engineering Department Project 926 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-02500-02 Section 25 $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-30590-01 Golden Meadow Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-30590-02 Golden Meadow Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-30590-03 Golden Meadow Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-31750-01 Haeg First $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-31750-02 Haeg First $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-31750-03 Haeg First $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-31750-04 Haeg First $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41950-01 King Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41950-02 King Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41950-03 King Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41950-04 King Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41950-05 King Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41951-01 King 2nd Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41951-02 King 2nd Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41951-03 King 2nd Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41951-04 King 2nd Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-41951-05 King 2nd Addition To Eagan $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-44550-01 Laurent 1st Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-44550-02 Laurent 1st Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-01 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-02 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page I of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-03 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-04 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-05 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-06 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-07 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 2 of 10 8)5 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-52100-08 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-09 Northview Meadows $515.26 $660.00 $164.74 10-52100-09 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-09 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-09 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-09 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-10 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-10 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-10 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-10 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $16474 10-52100-10 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-11 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-11 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-11 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-11 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-11 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-12 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-12 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-12 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-12 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-12 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-13 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $16474 10-52100-13 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-13 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-13 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-13 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-14 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-14 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-14 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-14 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-14 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-15 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-15 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-15 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Page 3 of 10 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 NO r Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-52100-15 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-15 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-16 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-16 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-16 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-16 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-16 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-17 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-17 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-17 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-17 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-17 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-18 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-18 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-18 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-18 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-19 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-19 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-19 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-19 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-20 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-20 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-20 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-20 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-21 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-21 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-21 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-21 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-22 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-22 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-22 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-22 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-23 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-23 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 4 of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-52100-23 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-23 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-24 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-24 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-25 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-25 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-26 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-26 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-27 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-27 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-28 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-28 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-29 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-29 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-30 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-30 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-31 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-31 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-32 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-32 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-33 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-33 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-34 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-34 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-35 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-35 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-36 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-36 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-37 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-38 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-39 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-40 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-41 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-42 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 5 of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-52100-43 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-52100-44 Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-01 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-01 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-01 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-02 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-02 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-02 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-03 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-03 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-03 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-04 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-04 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-04 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-05 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-05 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-05 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-06 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-06 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-06 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $660.00 $164.74 10-56210-07 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-07 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-56210-07 Overview Estates Replat $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-63400-01 Revised Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-63400-02 Revised Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-63400-03 Revised Northview Meadows $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-01 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-01 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-02 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-02 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-03 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-03 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-03 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-04 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 6 of 10 01 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-65800-04 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-04 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-05 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-05 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-05 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-06 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-06 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-06 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-07 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-07 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-08 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-09 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10=65800-10 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-11 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-65800-12 Saddle Horn $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-01 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-01 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-02 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-02 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-03 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-03 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-04 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-04 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-05 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-05 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-06 Sunsetlst $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-06 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-07 Sunset 1st $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72985-07 Sunsetlst $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-01 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-02 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-03 Sunset2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-04 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-05 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 7 of 10 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72986-06 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-07 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-08 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-09 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-10 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-11 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72986-12 Sunset 2nd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-01 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-02 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-03 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-04 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-05 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72987-06 Sunset 3rd $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-01 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-01 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-01 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-01 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-02 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-02 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-02 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-02 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-03 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-03 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-03 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-03 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-04 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-04 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-05 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-05 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-06 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-06 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-07 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-07 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-08 Sunset 4th $515.26 $6B0.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 8 of 10 I Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72988-08 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-09 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-09 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-10 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-10 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-11 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-12 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-13 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-14 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-15 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72988-16 Sunset 4th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-01 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-01 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-02 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-02 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-03 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-03 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-04 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-04 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-05 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72991-05 Sunset 6th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72992-01 Sunset 7th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72992-02 Sunset 7th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72994-01 Sunset 9th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72994-02 Sunset 9th $515.26 $580.00 $164.74 10-72994-03 Sunset 9th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72994-04 Sunset 9th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-01 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-02 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-02 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-03 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-04 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72996-05 Sunset 10th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-01 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 9 of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP926 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72997-01 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-02 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-02 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-03 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-03 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-04 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-04 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-05 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-05 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-06 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-07 Sunset 1lth $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-08 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-09 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-10 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-11 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-12 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-13 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72997-14 Sunset 11th $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72999-01 Sunset 13th Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72999-02 Sunset 13th Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72999-03 Sunset 13th Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-72999-04 Sunset 13th Addition $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-74950-01 T E M $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 10-74950-02 T E M $515.26 $680.00 $164.74. 10-74950-03 T E M $515.26 $680.00 $164.74 Summary for 'SA_N6r' = 10P926 (330 detail records) Sum $170,035.80 $224,400.00 $54,364.20 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 10 of 10 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting D. PROJECT 927, MEADOWLAND 1sT/ BEAVER DAM ROAD/ SUNCLIFF 1sT - 5th ADDITIONS STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 927 (Meadowland 1St/ Beaver Dam Road/ Suncliff 1St-5th S Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 927 provided for the bituminous overlay of numerous streets within the Meadowland 1St/ Beaver Dam Road/ Suncliff 1 st " 5th Additions. • The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 5, 2006, with a public hearing scheduled for October 3 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. • The final assessment cost is about 21% less than the estimated benefit amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 5, 2005. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been received to date. An informational meeting was held on September 28 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 327 parcels (278 R-1 Single-Family & 48 Townhomes, and 1 Public Facility) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages through. 1 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES Number: Project 927 Assessment: October 3, 2006 Name: Meadowland 1'`/Beaver Dam Rd./Suncliff V- 5th Project Approval Date: December 5, 2005 Mill & Overlay Final Feasibility Final Feasibility Rate Report Units Rate Resort Units SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lateral Benefit WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral ® Surfacing/ Signs $388.77 $492 /Lot-SF. $18.49 25 /Lot-TH-Ind. ❑ Service $7.42 $9.81 /F.F. Public Fac. ❑ Multi Family Equiv. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ CA Equiv. ❑ Driveway OTHER STREET LIGHTS ❑ Service Pair ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge Contract Number of Interest Amount Citv Number Parcels Terms Rate Assessed* Financed* 06-03 327 5 Years 5.50% $142,420 F.R. $335,020 F.R. $112,126.65 $220,361.70 (F.R. = Feasibility Report) Abloth e~o fit of E To: Mayor and City Council From: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer Date: September 20, 2006 Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 927 Meadowland/ Suncliff/ Beaver Dam Road Street Overlay Improvements At the public hearing on December 5, 2005, the City Council ordered Project 927, and in accordance with the feasibility report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for numerous streets within the Meadowland I"/ Suncliff 1'-5 h/ Beaver Dam Road neighborhood, and replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 50% of the street overlay and signage improvements to residential properties and 75% to public facility properties, in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The improvements were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for Project 927. L PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $277,028.38 paid to the contractors for the construction of the improvements. Traffic and street signage was installed at a cost of $7,083.32. Other costs including engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $48,376.65 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $332,488.35. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT Street Resurfacing/ Sign Replace (32' St) $147,196.99 $25,059.75 $172,256.74 $234,730 Street Resurfacing/ Sign Replace (44' St) $58,352.79 $9,939.90 $68,292.69 $93,030 Curb & Gutter Repair $78,561.92 $13,377.00 $91.938.92 $149,680 Totals $284,111.70 $48,376.65 $332,488.35 $477,440 1 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk improvements were installed under this project, therefore, trunk assessments are not proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET B PROVEMENTS 1. The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements on the 32-foot wide residential streets were computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L. S. 1 $200.00 $200.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 12,884 1.21 15,589.64 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 1,575 1.50 2,362.50 Wear Course Mixture Ton 3,003.38 37.63 113,017.19 Traffic control L. S. 1 630.00 630.00 Adjust water valve box - riser Each 16 75.00 1,200.00 Repair gate valve top Each 3 143.00 429.00 Adjust manhole casting - complete Each 18 295.00 5,310.00 Adjust manhole casting - riser Each 24 128.00 3,072.00 Repair landscaping Each 3 105.00 315.00 Traffic signs L.S. 1 5,071.66 5,071.66 SUBTOTAL $147,196.99 Other costs @16.6% $25,059.75 Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost 32' Streets $172,256.74 2. The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements on the 44-foot wide residential street (Beaver Dam Road) were computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Mobilization L.S. 1 $420.00 $420.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 3,817 1.21 4,618.57 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 600 1.50 900.00 Wear Course Mixture Ton 1,232 37.17 45,793.44 Traffic control L. S. 1 630.00 630.00 Adjust water valve box - riser Each 3 75.00 225.00 Repair gate valve top Each 2 143.00 286.00 Adjust manhole casting - complete Each 7 295.00 2,065.00 Adjust manhole casting - riser Each 8 128.00 1,024.00 4" Solid white line pvmt marking L.F. 108 0.19 20.52 4" Double solid yellow line L.F. 109 0.40 43.60 Pavement message - Lt/ Thru Each 1 183.75 183.75 2 q7 UNIT EXTENDED ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE COST Pavement message - Rt Each 1 131.25 131.25 Traffic signs L.S. 1 2,011.66 2,011.66 . SUBTOTAL $58,352.79 Other costs @16.8% $9,939.90 Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost 44' Street $68,292.69 C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES 1. 278 residential equivalent properties within the project area (including 8 residential equivalents for Meadowland Park) are low-density residential with direct driveway access to improved streets. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density residential properties are computed as follows: Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (32' Wide Streets) _ $172,256.74 Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (44' Wide Street) _ $68,292.69 x 32/44 = $49,667.41 (Residential Street Equiv.) Subtotal Improvement Cost = $221,924.15 Total Low-Density Residential Frontage w/ direct access = 22,384/ 22,985 (Total F.F.) = 97.4% Total Improvement Cost (Low-Density) = $221,924.15 x 97.4% = $216,154.12 TOTAL IlVIPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $215,755.54 278 Lots $776.53/Lot IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $776.53/ Lot X 50% $388.77/Lot 2. 48 townhome properties within the project area (Suncliffe 3rd) have indirect driveway access to improved streets. These townhomes are proposed to be assessed based on their common property's front footage adjacent to Beaver Dam Road (175 feet).The improvement and assessment rates for these residential properties are computed as follows: Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (32' Wide Streets) _ $172,256.74 Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (44' Wide Street) _ $68,292.69 x 32/44 = $49,667.41 (Residential Street Equiv.) Subtotal Improvement Cost = $221,924.15 Total Townhome Frontage w/ indirect access = 175/ 22,985 (Total F.F.) = 0.8% Total Improvement Cost (Townhomes) = $221,924.15 x 0.8% _ $1,775.39 3 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $1,775.39 48 Lots $36.98/Lot IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $36.98/ Lot X 50% $18.49/Lot 3. One public facility property within the project area (Christ Lutheran Church) has direct driveway access to improved streets. This property is proposed to be assessed based on its front footage adjacent to Beaver Dam Road (426 feet).The improvement and assessment rates for this property is computed as follows: Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (32' Wide Streets) = $172,256.74 Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs (44' Wide Street) = $68,292.69 x 32/44 = $49,667.41 (Residential Street Equiv.) Subtotal Improvement Cost = $221,924.15 Total Frontage direct access = 426/ 22,985 (Total F.F.) = 1.9% Total Improvement Cost (Public Facility) = $221,924.15 x 1.9% = $4,216.56 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $4,215.56 426 F.F. $9.89/ F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $9.89/ F.F. X 75% $7.42/ F.F. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE RESPONSIBILITY Street Resurfacing/ Signs $240,549.43 $112,126.65 ($128,422.78) Curb & Gutter Repair 91,938.92 (91,938.92) Total $332,488.35 $112,126.65 ($220,361.70) FUND AMOUNT Major Street Fund $220,361.70 4 John Gor, r, P.E. V Reviewed Reviewed Public Works Department Finance D ent 9 - 2G 0~, 9'0l Dated Dated c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I 5 DIFFLEY ROAD sr 1973 1967 LL 194 Q LL 897 895 0 1961 1972 1966 , I~ r - ».;•`4vt3:. 0 ~~~Q~A 0 0~ O I 4230 S 1971 1969 965 r 4235 ,0 yV). 16 .5.. 1949 4241 • 0p vat. 4 3 ti0002o.._ ,877 945 4247 Q' 4234 ~ 0,10 } 1875 46 4 425: • 4239 Y~~ ` 6gj t<A. ~73 m 1829 X74 1968 1964 1960 1954 ,25~ 950 196 'VO 426: ~ 4250 4849 ~9 f, 1872 14 N 1g69 ~ 4LJ 959 19 v 4271 4256 25149.9] 1870 d~ ,667 4262 • 4252 1865 D e 25 1668x 263 l86 l Q0 ~n 426 • rs~~• 4256 1866 q°j 1837 9681964196D 7 2671864 ~q 1 0 0P 104518 91S 271 • t • 1853 849 A O • :y4257 ~4264 1862 4 _ 1964 • 'P~iQ~ 442634268 4290 4274 1916 270 1860 ` P LL • 288 4285 ` 27 4271 4274276 IU58 4272 4275 • 4278 e~,9 4 280 ~r 290 4289 9 4277 s 42804275 4282 n 4276 4281 n 4292 4293 4286282 428 VA 428 4279 4280 4287 d286 O'q/~~ 4290 4283 4294 4295 4287 FN 4284 4293 4290 `ILI_ 429 4291 '4zi 428 4287 288 4297 4298 4297 429 1883 i4294 , 4295 rA 4292 4300 4299 4296 4291 301 4302 IBB 5 4292 ~ 4296 cJ 4301 89 189 as 1881 4299 429 4295 2 296 430 • 4306 43D5 :9 • • •CT 4301 U 430D 43D1 "9 43D0 305• - 4306 s, 4310 4307 4304 307• rsr.. 1882 43D5! 4305 304 X 4306 4316 4309 322 4308 4309 4308 309• 4310 • 4309 4312 ,zip' • 188 1886 4312 ' 4322 4311 1900 1894 892 1884 4313 4311 4318 1896 4315 ~ 4312 4333 4315 ~'N 4316 4317 4316 4374 1901 891 889 188 188 188 1881 - 4313 897 893 • ~ • • • • 1879 1877 ~ • • 431 4317 ~ 4314 6 4341 B P • ."f 1918 873 4316 , 4349 1910 1869 4320 4319 9D6 431 4322 4357 19 900 4321 L878 989 896 69 892 890 Be 086188 188 880 1874 4323 4320 , 4365 • • • • 72 870 86 X66 `E 432 4347 64 , 4373 • 10 • 4349 • 4345 4327 4324 o33 1 9 4329 4352 ~ 4328 , 4381 434 • _ 433 _ T 4350 LE LN. 4 4348 • 4332 , 346 342 340 4339 ' 4344 , 19 0 ~ S ~ S ® ® ® Y~ /IS ® ® ~ ~ ~ O LEGEND N • ~ 388.77 S.F. Lot Assessment $ 18.49 Lot Assessment w E 7.42 Front Footage s Street Improvments NO SCALE Assessment Area G:Project and Contract Information\0927\Meadowland BeoverD~ 1 Sth JJ lCS Beaver Meadowlan l Dam Rd. 1 Suncliff 1st - 5th Street Improvements - Assess ent Map Project 927 Engineering Department Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-02900-01 Section 29 $3,160.92 $4,180.00 $1,019.08 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-00 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-01 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-18 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-19 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-20 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-21 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-22 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-48050-23 Meadowlands 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $2,881.36 $4,200.00 $1,318.64 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-01 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st •$388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-02 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 1 of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1St $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-03 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-04 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-04 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-04 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-04 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-04 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-05 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-05 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-05 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-05 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-05 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-06 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-06 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-06 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-06 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-07 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-07 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-07 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-07 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-08 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-08 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-08 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-09 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-09 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-09 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23. 10-72975-10 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-10 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-10 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-11 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-11 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-11 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 2 of 10 !n3 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72975-12 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-12 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-12 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-13 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-13 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-13 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-14 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-14 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-14 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-15 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-15 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-15 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-16 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-16 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-16 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-17 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-17 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-17 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-18 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-18 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 1D-72975-18 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-19 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-19 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-19 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-20 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-20 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-20 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-21 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-21 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-21 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-22 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-22 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-22 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-23 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 3 of 10 l Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72975-23 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-24 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-24 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-25 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72975-26 Sun Cliff 1st $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-01 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-01 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-01 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-01 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-02 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-02 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-02 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-02 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-02 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-03 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-03 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-03 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-03 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-04 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-04 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-04 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-04 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-05 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-05 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-05 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-05 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-06 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-06 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-06 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-06 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-07 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-07 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-07 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-07 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 1 Page 4 of 10 1 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number 1OP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72976-08 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-08 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-08 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-08 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-09 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-09 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-09 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-09 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-10 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-10 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-10 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-10 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-11 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-11 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-11 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-11 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-12 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-12 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-12 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-12 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-13 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-13 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-13 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-14 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-14 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-14 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-15 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-15 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-15 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-16 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-16 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-16 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-17 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-17 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 5 of 10 I D(O Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72976-17 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-18 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-18 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-18 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-19 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-19 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-19 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976 20 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-20 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-21 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-21 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-22 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-22 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-23 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-23 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72976-24 Sun Cliff 2nd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-00 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 .10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 DI Page 6 of 10 t Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-01 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-02. Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-02 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $16.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-03 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 7 of 10 Ob Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-04 Sun Cliff 3rd $18.49 $25.00 $6.51 10-72977-05 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72977-05 Sun Cliff 3rd $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-01 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-01 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-01 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-02 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-02 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-02 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-03 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-03 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-03 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-04 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-04 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-04 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-05 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-05 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-05 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-06 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-06 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-06 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-07 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-07 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-08 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-08 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-09 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-09 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-10 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-10 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-11 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-11 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 8 of 10 Combined Assessment Roll Project Number JOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72978-12 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-12 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-13 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-13 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-14 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-14 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-15 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-16 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-17 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72978-18 Sun Cliff 4th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-01 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-01 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-01 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-02 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-02 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-02 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-03 Sun Cliff 5th $38817 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-03 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-03 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-04 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-04 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-04 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-05 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-05 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-05 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-06 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-06 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-06 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-07 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-07 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-08 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-08 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-09 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-09 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 9 of 10 I~ Combined Assessment Roll Project Number IOP927 Proposed Pending PID Addition Name Assessment Assessment Variance 10-72979-10 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-10 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-11 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-11 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-12 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-12 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-13 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-13 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-14 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-14 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-15 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-15 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-16 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-17 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 10-72979-18 Sun Cliff 5th $388.77 $492.00 $103.23 Summary for'SA_Nbr' = 10P927 (320 detail records) Sum $111,697.70 $142,420.00 $30,522.30 Tuesday, September 26, 2006 Page 10 of 10 I Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting E. LOT 1. BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER NO.4 EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the vacation of a portion of public drainage & utility easements within Lot 1, Block 1 Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On August 16, 2006, City staff received a petition from David DeSutter, representative of the property owner of Lot 1, Block 1 Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4, Discovery Road Partners, requesting the vacation of a portion of public drainage & utility easements within this lot, north of Yankee Doodle Road and south of Discovery Road. • Public easements were dedicated as part of the Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4 plat to cover public storm sewer within Lot 4. • The purpose of the request is to allow Discovery Road Partners to construct a building addition in the area of the proposed easement vacation. • The storm sewer will be relocated and replacement easements have been dedicated with the building addition building permit. • Notices for the public hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected and/or interested parties for comment prior to the scheduled public hearing. Notices were sent to all the potentially impacted private utility companies. No objections to the proposed vacation have been received as of the date of this report. • The request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page. ` • Easement Vacation Exhibit, page 1 ll~ b ~J R Q r TRv Nk yti'1- Y No r\n LKJ ~ I LONE OAK ROAD LONE OAK ROAD 4 Proposed 0 Vacation z 0 co w z V) S~ Y Ay J z 0 > w U f YANKEE DOODLE ROAD o --L-ET ___j w O z x w J. ~J ESCOTT RO D > Q PAN ?A z O O z X w J DIFFLEY ROAD DIFFLEY ROAD Lot 1, Blk. 1, Eagandale Corporate Center 4th Add. Proposed Easement Vacation 8/30/06 Location Map City of Eagan I PROPOSED CASEMENT TO BE VACATE, D That part of the 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement as shown on Lot 1, Biock 1, on then recorded plat of Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4, Dakota County, Minnesota, the centerline of which is described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence South 00 degrocs, 34 minutes, 53 .Seconds West, assumed bearing along the west line thereof 179 feet; thence South 89 -degrees, 25 minutes, 07 seconds East 20-26 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 13 degrees, 42 minutes, 40 seconds East 118.09 feet; thence North 80 degrees, 01 minutes, 16 seconds East 160 feet and said centerline there terminating. GO C` 315`58 r 2rc~.78--- 30.C)C' j~Y, 3 -B CP J. s iG -nl Drainage And Utility Easement, >,4 i a~ 0 32.85',- "'1 N20`22',3T r{ "i V- EASEMENT TO BE VACATED, CA r ~ tom! O t^, IN '0 , ! C7/L(Z) v 1 Drainage And ~ Cp" v ~ Utility Easement. 41.173 Z X204.34 C7 605,72 - 0 00_1; y Designoted access. c SEE DOODLE ROA COUNTY ROAD 506.72 37'50' E /14 South-line !3W 1/4 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting F. LOT 2, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 5TH ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the vacation of a portion of public drainage & utility easements within Lot 2, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park 5th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On August 25, 2006, City staff received a petition from Scott Soukup, representative of the property owner of Lot 2, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park 5t Addition, JBL Companies, requesting the vacation of a portion of public drainage & utility easements within this lot, east of Pilot Knob Road and south of Corporate Center Drive. • Public easements were dedicated as part of the Eagandale Office Park 5th Addition plat to cover public ponding and storm sewer. • In subsequent work on the development, the developer's land surveyor discovered a dimension error in the easement's legal description. • The purpose of the request is to remedy the error in the legal description. • Replacement easements, with the correct legal description, have been dedicated. • Notices for the public hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected and/or interested parties for comment prior to the scheduled public hearing. Notices were sent to all the potentially impacted private utility companies. No objections to the proposed vacation have been received as of the date of this report. • The request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page ~D . • Easement Vacation Exhibit, pages -1 -1]& A. 115 MEND 0TA HEIGHTS INTERSTATE //494 Q CORPORATE CF F\fl °v T R U V ~0 Proposed Vacation " SS J~ LONE OAK ROAD LONE OAK ROAD > Q O Z O Y H O O Z J a 4 W J $ t~Q' YANKEE DOODLE ROAD w ¢ f O z X W J LJ IESCOTT D ui of > PARK R0. Z O Z X W J Lot 2, Blk. 1, Eagandale Office Park 5th Add. Proposed Easement Vacation 8/30/06 City of Eagan Location Map 11(40 1 N89 °59'.37"E - 29Q 02 - 36•p24$"v+ ca N _ 163 ~'/O, ...Q~.~684r.. s96j- ~F/F/N v _ p RA- for 4r ki '76 4. 400;;l, OCA- CA e4 '40.7 i q OJW 51'38 WE U 30.74-1------- V.. .98• Qa~4. U- N . N63:24'SS~W . . . . . . . . . 0Z I• .4 VP,r 43.26 N8 9°52'16"W 'e jr► 1.\.r... .............Iwo °pN n-~ n n 21-1 j o~:.:.'.'8.' QVV LL ~~~y3yti 0 ell C L;.I J Q ~ U (/7 1 F07 PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION The drainage and utility easement recorded as Document Number 579498 and described as follows: An easement over, under and across that part of Lot 2, Block I, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 5TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 37' seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 290.02 feet to point of curve on said northerly line of Lot 2; thence southeasterly a distance of 137.92 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 582.30 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 34 minutes 15 seconds along said northerly line of Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence continuing along said 582.30 foot radius curve, being the northerly line of Lot 2, a distance of 73.94 feet and a central angle of 7 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds; thence South 64 degrees 43 minutes 21 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 77.98 feet; thence South 53 degrees 52 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 70.22 feet; South 4 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 30.32 feet; thence South 44 degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 141.26 feet; thence North 74 degrees 24 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 43.26 feet; thence on a bearing of North a distance of 120.48 feet; thence North 56 degrees 57 minutes II seconds West a distance of 22.58 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 43.26 feet; thence North 42 degrees 38 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 14.77 feet; thence North 0 degrees 7 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 64.14 feet; thence North 36 degrees 02 minutes 48 seconds West a distance of 17.83 feet to the point of beginning. CI Agenda Information Memo Eagan City Council Meeting Public Hearing October 3, 2006 G. CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA AND U"OSITION OF FEES ON HOUSING UNITS WITHIN THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA To hold and close a public hearing on the possible implementation of a Housing Improvement Districtunder Minnesota Statutes Sections 428A.11-428A.21 and to direct preparation of: 1. An ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvements Area. 2. A resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area to finance improvements. 3. A Development Agreement between the City and the Association. FACTS: • The owners of the Cedar Bluff Townhomes have requested that the City establish a Housing Improvement Area to finance the replacement of patio doors and windows and to repair concrete and foundations. • A city may create a Housing Improvement Area to finance improvements to the common areas of condo and townhome associations when other financing cannot be obtained. This financing mechanism was adopted by the state legislature because homeowner associations cannot readily obtain financing; they have very little collateral and cannot mortgage individual's units. Within a Housing Improvement Area, the City may finance housing improvements and recover the cost by assessing fees, much like special assessments. The fees are assessed against each unit, and appear on the property tax statement to be paid by the individual homeowners with their taxes. • The sequence of events that has preceded the public hearing is as follows: ❑ In 2005, the City Council was approached by the Cedar Bluffs Homeowners Association regarding the potential creation of a City policy for the creation of Housing Improvement District. ❑ In response, the City Council adopted a policy on September 20, 2005 that would permit consideration of petitions and the process by which applications would be reviewed. I)q ❑ On April 4, 2006, the City Council received the Cedar Bluffs Homeowners Association preliminary application and petition and authorized staff to request that the Association make a formal submittal of improvement plans, detailed financial plans and a fee to cover City costs associated with the detailed review. ❑ Those submittals were made and reviewed by City staff, the City Attorney, the Dakota County CDA and Ehlers and Associates, the City's fiscal consultant. They are in order for formal consideration through the public hearing process. ❑ On September 5, 2006 the City Council adopted a resolution calling for a public hearing on October 3, and notice was duly published and distributed to the owners of each unit, as required by state law. • The total cost of the improvements, including financing costs, is estimated to be $767,900. The City will make a loan to the association in an amount up to $767,900 at an interest rate of 5.5% and amortized over 15 years. The proposed annual housing improvement fee will be set at 105% of the annual principal and interest due. • The proposed fee for each homeowner is: ❑ $660.45 per year ($55.04 per month) ❑ $6,368.44 total if paid in full • Following the public hearing, if the City Council wishes to proceed in establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, the Council may direct staff to prepare: ❑ an ordinance establishing the Housing Improvement Area; ❑ a resolution imposing housing improvement fees; and ❑ a development agreement between the City and the association Each of these items will come back to the Council for consideration on October 17, 2006. ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Review schedule on pa*page ❑ Location map on page ❑ Public Hearing Notice Z30 ❑ Preliminary project costs and fee estimates on page I GJ t~ SCHEDULE OF EVENTS THE CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING II"ROVEMENT AREA, and APPROVING THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING HAPPROVEMENT FEE December, 2005 City receives Housing Improvement Area application for the Cedar Bluffs Association, including a petition from at least 51% of the owners. August 29, 2006 Association submits financial plan and completes application. September 5, 2006 City Council meets at 6:30 p.m. and calls for public hearing on the establishment of the Housing Improvement Area. September 21, 2006 Notices are mailed to owners (at least 10 days prior to hearing). September 22, 2006 Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least 7 days prior to hearing). Publication faxed to Thisweek News on September 20, 2006 October 3, 2006 City Council holds public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on the establishment of the Housing Improvement Area and approving the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Fee. Following the public hearing, City Council directs preparation of Ordinance establishing the Housing Improvement Area and the development agreement. By Oct. 10, 2006 City and Association complete Development Agreement. October 17, 2006 City Council considers and adopts the Ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Area effective on or after November 24, 2006. City Council approves resolution establishing housing improvement fee and approves Development Agreement. October 18, 2006 City sends summary of ordinance and resolution and notice of owners' veto rights to each owner. (Within frve days of adopting ordinance and/or resolution). By Nov. 16, 2006 Copy of Ordinance sent to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (within 30 days of adoption). By Nov. 30, 2006 City certifies housing improvement fee to Dakota County. December 1, 2006 Housing Improvement Area becomes effective, if there are no owner vetoes or appeals. December 4, 2006 City cancels levy for housing improvement fee if an appeal is filed l~ - 0 ..k W Z Subject Site TEN ST. ~ i II a ~ r -1 r L DI a a Li a. I n i 0 DONALD COU y {e EM o 0 400 800 1,000 N Feet Cedar Bluff Townhomes I PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Eagan will hold a public hearing on October 3, 2006, at approximately 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan City Council Chambers in the Eagan Municipal Center, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Minnesota, to consider two actions under Minnesota Statutes Sections 428A.1 I- 428A.21 as follows: 1. Adoption of an ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area. 2. Adoption of a resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area. Within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, the City proposes to facilitate various improvements to the Cedar Bluff Condominiums. The boundaries of the proposed Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area are shown in the map below. Fees imposed on the owners of units in the Cedar Bluff Condominiums would finance the improvements. Details regarding the hearing, the improvements and the fees are described below: 1. Persons to be heard: All persons owning housing units in the proposed housing improvement area that would be subject to a fee for housing improvements, and all other interested persons, will be given an opportunity to be heard at the hearing. 2. Proposed Improvements: The exterior common area and building system improvements include: windows and patio door replacement for each unit and foundation repair. 3. Estimated Cost of Improvements to be paid in whole or in part by housing improvement fee: $767,900.00 including administrative costs. 4. Amount to be charged against each housing unit: Estimates of the fee to be imposed on housing units in the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area are included in the table below. The Annual Fee per unit is shown and includes interest on the cost per unit at a rate of 5.5% per annum. The total 15 year fee amount is shown. The Total Prepayment Fee (Principal only) is shown. Fees may not be more than the amounts shown. Annual Fee for Total 15 Year Total 15 Years Fee Prepayment Fee $660.45 $9,906.75 $6,368.44 123 5. Owner's right to prepay the total fee: Housing unit owners may prepay in whole but not in part at any time. Payment made in any calendar year must include interest through the date of the prepayment. 6. Number of years the fee will be in effect: If owners do not prepay the Total Prepayment Fee, the Annual Fee will be imposed in equal installments over a period not to exceed 15 years. The first installment will be payable in 2007 with each half of real estate taxes. 7. Owner's right to prepay after imposition of the Annual Fee: Owners may prepay the unpaid installment of the Annual Fee at any time. 8. Compliance with Petition Requirement: Owners of more than 25 percent of the housing units that would be subject to the proposed fee in the Cedar BluffHousing Improvement Area have filed a petition with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing on the proposed fee, which exceeds the requirement under Ch. 428A.12. For further information on the proposed housing improvement fee, contact Jon Hohenstein at (651) 675-5660. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA /s/ Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Director 2A PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only EHLERS 6 ASSOCIATES INC Preliminary Estimates for Public Hearing Notices City of Eagan Housing Improvement Area - Cedar Bluff Townhomes Project Costs Concrete/Foundation $ 276,000 Windows/Patio Doors $ 417,000 Consultant Fee in soft costs Contingendy $ 40,000 Total Construction Costs $ 733,000 Finance Costs Capitalized Interest 1 - Soft costs 34,900 Total Project Costs $ 767,900 Less Interest Earnings 2 $ (3,687) HIA Loan Amount $ 764,213 Term (years) 15 Average Rate 3 5.50% Annual Debt Payment 4 $79,254 Total Units 120 Cost/Unit - Annual $660.45 Cost(Unit - Monthly $55.04 Assessment - Per/Unit $ 6,368.44 1 Assumes fees levied in 2006 for initial collection in 2007. 2 Estimate - subject to change- will depend upon construction draws. 3 Estimate - subject to change. 4 Debt Payment is 105% of principal and interest due. Assumes loan closes 2-1-2007. Breakdown of Soft Costs Association's Eng. Consultant 15,000 City Admin Fee 5,000 Legal Fees 3,000 Escrow Agent Service 900 Dakota County CDA Inspections 5,000 Financial Advisor 6,000 TOTAL 34,900 9/26/2006 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS A. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT- WINTER SEASON PARKING ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1) Approve OR deny an amendment to City Ordinance 9.09 (Winter Season Parking) relating to winter parking regulations on certain city streets that have either even addresses on both sides of the street or odd addresses on both sides of the street and authorize publication in the City's legal newspaper for two weeks. 2) Approve OR deny a resolution establishing winter season parking regulations as proposed by the City Engineer for Denmark Trail East/West and Denmark Court East/West and authorize the installation of regulatory street signs. FACTS (for Action 41): • In 1983, the City's instituted a winter season parking ordinance to provide for more efficient and safer snow removal and to help identify abandoned or disabled vehicles. • The winter parking ordinance is in effect from November 15 to April 15 of each year. According to City Ordinance 9.09, "on odd-numbered days parking shall be permitted only on that side of the street with odd-numbered addresses for a period of 12 hours beginning at 6:00 a.m. and continuing until 6:00 p.m." There is a similar restriction for even addresses/days. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. • Approximately 105 street segments within the City have either even addresses on both sides of the street or have odd addresses on both sides of the street. The current winter parking restrictions prohibit all parking on these streets every other day (6am - 6pm), between November 15 and April 15. • The proposed ordinance amendment is written to allow a Council resolution establishing specific winter parking regulations for segments of City streets that have either even addresses on both sides of the street or odd addresses on both sides of the street. The limits of any restrictions would be determined by the City Engineer such that daily parking would be provided on alternating sides of the street during the winter season. The current resident petition process would continue to be utilized for consideration of all future segments. • Upon published notice of the ordinance amendment for two weeks in the City's legal newspaper, the ordinance becomes official. ISSUES (for Action #2): • All houses on Denmark Trail West and Denmark Court West are odd-numbered and all houses on Denmark Trail East and Denmark Court East are even- numbered. I~ • On August 29, the City received a petition from 16 people representing 15 of the 41 affected properties requesting that signage be installed that would regulate parking on alternating sides of each cul-de-sac on alternating days (Nov. 15 - April 15), similar to the current odd/even restriction. • The proposed designation would also help relieve parking inconveniences caused by the "No Parking" restrictions that exist on the west side of Denmark Avenue resulting from the recently completed sidewalk improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Petition and Petitioners' Map, pages through • Draft Ordinance Amendment, page I32 FOR CITY USE O LY / Date Received 7" '~Cy a'r Date Presented City 1 5 Q (o Of Ea n To Council Ull Approved ❑ 'PETITION Denied ❑ DESIGNATE A WINTER PARKING SCHEDULE I/We, the undersigned, hereby petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to designate a winter parking schedule by allowing parking on the south and east sides of certain streets listed below on even calendar days and allowing parking on the north and west sides of certain streets listed below on odd calendar days from November 15 to April 15 of the following year. We further petition the installation of associated permanent signing on the certain streets listed below to identify these designations. The winter parking designations and associated permanent signing are petitioned for the following streets: Denmark Trail West, Denmark Trail East, Denmark Court West and Denmark Court East. I/We request this parking designation for the following reasons: • All .houses on Denmark Trail West and Denmark Court West are odd-numbered and all houses on Denmark Trail East and Denmark Court East are even-numbered. The current winter parking regulations only allow parking on these streets every other day between November 15 and April 15. • The proposed designations of a winter parking schedule would allow parking on one side of these streets each day. The side of the street where parking is allowed would alternate each calendar day between November 15 and April 15 and would be identified with permanent signing. • The proposed designation would help relieve parking inconveniences caused by the "No Parking" restrictions that exist on the west side of Denmark Avenue required by the recently completed construction. • The proposed designations would allow snow removal to occur on a similar schedule with the majority of streets in the City. I/We request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity. Name Please PRINT and INITIAL ADDRESS 1.7 3. .044 /dva e,4- &j 5. 3 7O L , 41y4rr,_ Gf P GAFormsTetitionsMiinter Parking Schedule- Denmark Cu"-sacs.doc I,~ JAo +40PTzEk 'uA F; char ac 375 L-\)eorry- 1 ra.'~ 3 4,("4 e ~~q FOR CITY USE ONLY Date Received P-,9-e)& s City Date Presented of a11 ~n To Council Approved ❑ PETITION Denied ❑ DESIGNATE A WINTER PARKING SCHEDULE I/We, the undersigned, hereby petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to designate a winter parking schedule by allowing parking on the south and east sides of certain streets listed below on even calendar days and allowing parking on the north and west sides of certain streets listed below on odd calendar days from November 15 to April 15 of the following year. We further petition the installation of associated permanent signing on the certain streets listed below to identify these designations. The winter parking designations and associated permanent signing are petitioned for the following streets: Denmark Trail West, Denmark Trail East, Denmark Court West and Denmark Court East. I/We request this parking designation for the following reasons: • All houses on Denmark Trail West and Denmark Court West are odd-numbered and all houses on Denmark Trail East and Denmark Court East are even-numbered. The current winter parking regulations only allow parking on these streets every other day between November 15 and April 15. • The proposed designations of a winter parking schedule would allow parking on one side of these streets each day. The. side of the street where parking is allowed would alternate each calendar day between November 15 and April 15 and would be identified with permanent signing. • The proposed designation would help relieve parking inconveniences caused by the "No Parking" restrictions that exist on the west side of Denmark Avenue required by the recently completed construction. • The proposed designations would allow snow removal to occur on a similar schedule with the majority of streets in the City. I/We request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity. Name (Please PRINT and INITIAL) ADDRESS 1. i • I~~+'bee` ~roe.~s~~~ 37.( 3 Pen t„cw k- _re- LL) 2. C iz~CA 7~ it am rna-w- -V (A J 3. 3-7 Simi 5. &ill kIt-T4n 1711 DeK -w-Ile c-1- k/ GAFormsTetitions\inter Parking Schedule- Denmark Cul-d-sacs.doc / . LLI 11E4 1 Z 308 13061300 N L 1166 CL 3680 1162 1168 1176 117 118 120 1203 1205 1250 310 304 209 207 ,V,Vv• \ 129 1292 1201 TIMBERSHORE LN. 302130 3687 11 199 1 118 119 1244 1294 3693 3694 1163 1169 117 117 117 118 1197 l.ll 3697 3695 Q 696 116 116 117 117 1181 118 1189 1191 Y 3702 Q 3718 W \3 04 3708 3712 3716 0 )0 3705 NORTH DENMARK CT. E 711 -A` 3732 3715 Vv• 3728 G'( • 3724 3719 \ 3723 P~ 3740 _n 744 3756 3758 3737 3741 3 \ 3725 Q 3752 3733 3727 3748 376 3729 3747 3745 O 3749 PETITIONERS 37 RK v• 3762 3770 0~NMP 766 3771 3753 3769 3784 3767 3779 375 376 3794 3757 3763 3787 3795 v_ 3759 3761 Ljj Q Q 2 L1J G.Feos Re orts2005 Denmork7roil PetitionOo Porkin .:Denmark Avenue - Petitioners Map CltyOf~~~~Il Winter Parking Schedule I~) 8/30/06 Engineering Department DRAFT - 9.13.06 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER NINE ENTITLED "PARKING REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 9.09, SUBD. 2 REGARDING WINTER SEASON PARKING AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER I AND SECTION 9.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Nine is hereby amended by adding Section 9.09, Subd. 2(D), to read as follows: (D) The City Council may establish parking restrictions by resolution and direct signs be posted for applicable streets that have either even addresses on both sides of the street or odd addresses on both sides of the street. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation"' and Section 9.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Maria Petersen By: Pat Geagan Its: City Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: I Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting B. CONTRACT 06-08, NORTH RIDGE DRIVE & SIBLEY TERMINAL STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Award Contract 06-08 (North Ridge Drive & Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Drainage Improvements) to S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc, for: 1) The Base Bid of $208,282 OR 2) The Base Bid with Alternate #3 for $248,355 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Part of Contract 06-08 provides for the construction of corrective storm drainage improvements to address recurring home flooding concerns in the North Ridge Drive neighborhood under City Project No. 939. • On May 9, 2006, the City Council directed City staff to proceed with neighborhood meetings with affected North Ridge residents to review the proposed project, and authorized preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • On June 1 and August 16, City staff held neighborhood meetings to review and discuss the proposed improvements, potential construction impacts, proposed schedule, and needed easements for the project. Alternative designs (Alt. #3) have been incorporated into the detailed plans for bid solicitation comparison to allow the Council to evaluate the cost implications of resident requested options. • Another part of Contract 06-08 provides for the drainage improvements through the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park area near TH 13 and Terminal Drive in northwest Eagan under City Project 858. • On July 18, 2006, the City Council held a public hearing, approved Project 858 and authorized the acquisition of the pond easement and preparation of detailed plans and specifications. %ntract All necessary easements have been acquired for this project. • 06-08 also includes a maintenance improvement to the Fish Lake outlet structure (Alternate Bid #1), and the installation of additional catch basins on Shawnee Road (Alternate Bid #2). While all of these improvements have been combined under one contract for hopeful economies of scale, the bids for Alternates. #1 & 42 significantly exceeded the Engineer's estimate and should be rejected and reconsidered under a future contract. • On September 5, 2006, the Council approved the plans and authorized the advertisement for solicitation of competitive bids for Contract 06-08. • At 10:30 a.m. on September 28, formal bids for the base project and alternates were received. All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and accuracy on unit price extensions and summations. The low base bid from S.M. Hentges & 133 Sons, Inc. has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ISSUES: Alternate Bids • Alternate Bid #1 provides for the installation of a concrete outlet skimmer structure over the existing pipe from Fish Lake. The alternate bid received from the low base bidder (S.M. Hentges) was $32,988 or about 170% over the engineer's estimate for this work. Staff is recommending that this alternate not be accepted at this time. • Alternate Bid #2 provides for the installation of additional catch basin structures to minimize the frequency of street flooding at the low point of Shawnee Road. The alternate bid received from the low base bidder was $21,857 or about 50% over the engineer's estimate for this work. Staff is recommending that this alternate not be accepted at this time. • Alternate Bid 43 provides for the jacking/augering of the proposed new storm sewer pipe between the existing homes at 3864 & 3868 North Ridge Dr. This alternate construction method would cost an extra $40,072. There currently exists adequate permanent utility easements to accommodate this new construction. However, the affected home owners want to discuss the alternate. bid with the Council before conveying the additional temporary easements. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid Summary, page. • Aerial photos of Project 939, pages ls,)L through. • Project 939, North Ridge Drive, Alternate Bid Issues, page A. I BID SUMMARY North Ridge Drive/ Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Drainage Improvements City Project No's. 939/ 858 - City Contract No. 06-08 Bid Date: Thursday, September 28, 2006 Bid Time: 10:30 a.m. Contractors Total Base Bid 1.) S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc $ 208,282 2.) Jay Bros, Inc. $ 211,447 3.) Minger Construction, Inc. $ 235,612 4.) G.F. Jedlicki, Inc $ 269,473 5.) Friedges Contracting, Inc. $ 274,756 6.) G.L. Contracting, Inc $ 286,560 7.) Three Rivers Construction $ 454,634 Proiect 939 - North Ridge Drive - Base Bid Low Base Bid $ 131,437 PreliminarDesign Report Est. $113,300 Percent Over Estimate 16.0% Engineer's Estimate $132,300 Percent Under Estimate -0.7% Proiect 939 North Ridge Drive - Trenchless Construction - Alternate Bid 3 Low Base Bid $ 156,898 (Prof. 939 Total $171,510)_ Engineer's Estimate $ 119,900 (Project 939 Total Est. $144,260) Percent Over Estimate +30.9% (Project 939 Total +18.9%) Proiect 858 - Sibley Terminal/ Highway 13 - Base Bid Low Base Bid $ 76,845 Feasibility Report Estimate $ 120,900 Percent Under Estimate -36.4% Engineer's Estimate $ 67,050 Percent Over Estimate +14.6% Fish Lake Outlet Skimmer - Alternate Bid 1 Low Base Bid $ 32,988 Engineer's Estimate $ 12,200 Percent Over Estimate +171% Shawnee Road Catch Basins - Alternate Bid 2 Low Base Bid $ 21,857 Engineer's Estimate $ 14,700 Percent Over Estimate +48.7% ~ 2; cr_ M . -1 r ii (n ¢ r~ '~'2 x~ Ll1~~. r Z Cl) Cl) 1 - w i . ! ' i, . , `:k+Y~3C .,fir ry C 17 x a• f ; -~•~~a ► d'..+.+-~"•~^,"z• tom" - ry ' ti •~P~a•,~J ;M 46 ' e S . as h. b j7I - *C'4~ a 1 yr~. x , a r s ~ r k % r;" 4 diva F ' ,F•, ~ h SCf/ g;~i. yuak- i r •'~i E-1 ~ 1~.:3Y~ } AA~ y r n ,G. O ~y 3 M _ .r LO 4 ~ ~ rY i t~ f '^F r' e-i ~"S r/ ~ pfd` , 1'" -a~~t~. 'r t 1•t+4... r 0 Oi~ . r aF,• t ~dkss~i ~ _./.i...d~ by - .;r ` ' ~ - # t' ,1 till ' - - ~ ~ 3f', r t ~e~ tr;`~n-+✓ ~ S -•~w ~r r YS~ t y ~ ~e."ir: ~ ~x - ~ ~ j t yet' ~ L. ~v~,> w •rk ~ 41 _ , ~ M„d~iK f.~-rJ~ 4 y.~,'~ ~ • Via. Q. -41 r ~ ^ I ~ , ~ ~ / ~'c a}} ,r ' ' n j4~ 'r't•~ c~~~f, , ~ ¢y,~v wf J ~ T at, Project 939 - North Ridge Drive - Storm Drainage Improvements Base Bid & Alternate Bid 3 (Trench less Construction) City Contract No. 06-08 Bid Issues The residents adjacent to a portion of the proposed alignment of the North Ridge Drive Storm Drainage Improvement (Project 939) requested construction methods with less disturbance than traditional open trench installation of storm sewer pipe. Alternate Bid No. 3 was included to provide the opportunity for the City Council to consider trench less jacking/boring of a portion of the storm sewer pipe between these houses with limited construction area (3864 & 3868 North Ridge Drive). . ■ The low base bid for Project 939 (Part I of the base bid) is $116,825. ■ The alternate bid (trench less) from the low base bidder is $156,898 ($40,073 more). The attached Pictometry exhibits represent the proximity of the proposed construction to the homes of the impacted property owners and support the concerns of the residents proposed to be impacted by the pipe construction. The primary concerns expressed by the residents include the potential for damage to the residential dwellings and the impacts to landscaping. The concerns are valid and justified the alternate bid for Council consideration. The additional cost of the augering/ boring alternate is significant. Similar open trench construction occurred as part of the July 2000 Storm mitigation efforts without damage to adjacent homes. Staff is familiar with monitoring efforts that can be implemented as part of the construction to ensure that any damage that may occur would be recorded for further addressing/repair by the City. The cost of this monitoring would be considerably less than the proposed $40,000 additional cost. Significant landscaping impacts occurred as a part of the July 2000 Storm mitigation efforts, including the loss of numerous significant trees. The Council established a replacement policy that replaced significant trees, but did not replace other landscaping. I Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - BYERLY'S ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, subject to the conditions in the staff report. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes FACTS: ➢ Byerly's is proposing outside display of seasonal fresh produce. ➢ There are currently three bins located outside the store entrance, totaling 48 sq. ft. ➢ The PD Amendment proposes to increase the outside display to allow six bins with a total display area of 96 sq. ft. The bins would be placed further out from the building at the main entrance as shown on the submitted site plan. ➢ Upon visiting the site, staff noticed two propane cages which are also considered part of the outside display, adding approximately 14 sq. ft. to the total display area. ➢ Staff's evaluation in the staff report suggests a modified plan for three display bins in their current location and the two propane cages in their current location with a total outside display area of approximately 62 sq. ft. ➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 2006 and is recommending denial because the applicant was not in attendance at that meeting to address the APC's questions. The applicant was unable to attend the public hearing due to a death in the family. ISSUES: ➢ The APC questioned whether the applicant was agreeable to the staff suggestion of only three bins in the current locations rather than the proposed six bins shown on the proposal. Byerly's has indicated that the three bins are acceptable. ➢ The APC also questioned why the bin display was already occurring in advance of the PD Amendment. Because the existing bin area is less than 60 sq. ft., they were in compliance with the limits of the City Code. The applicant was also unaware that the propane cages are also part of the outside display until staff brought that to their attention in the staff report. 60 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: October 29, 2006 ATTACHMENTS (3): September 19, 2006 APC Minutes on pages through Staff Report, pages 143 throu h Modified Site Plan, page I~ Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 1 of 11 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA September 19, 2006 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, at 6:30 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Vice Chair Chavez, Members Keeley, Feller, Jensen, and Dugan. Also present were, City Planner Mike Ridley, Planner Pam Dudziak, City Attorney Bob Bauer, City Engineer Russ Mathis, and Recording Secretary Camille Worley. AGENDA Member Keeley moved, Member Dugan seconded a motion to adopt the Agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried 5-0. August 22, 2006, ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Member Keeley moved, Member Feller seconded a motion to approve the August 22, 2006, Advisory Planning Commission Meeting minutes. All voted in favor. Motion carried 5-0. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) There were no visitors who wished to be heard. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Byerly's - outdoor display Applicant Name:Byerly's Location: 1299 Promenade Place; Lot 8 Blk 2 & Lot 9 Blk 2 Ex Pt Platted as Eagan Promenade 3rd Addition Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of seasonal items. File Number: 10-PA-11-07-06 Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated September 14, 2006. She noted the background and history. Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Dugan explained that he would vote against approval because the outdoor display activity is occurring prior to approval of the Planned Development Amendment and the lack of appearance by the applicant to answer questions. M Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 2 of 1 l Member Keeley moved, Member Dugan seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of products at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, located in the S %2 of Section 10 subject to the following conditions: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. Fresh produce display shall be limited to three 4'x 4' bins located between the building and the pillars near the front entrance. 3. Outside display shall occur only between May 1 and November 15 of each year. 4. Outside display items shall consist only of fresh seasonal produce. All items displayed shall be confined to the bins themselves, and shall not extend onto the sidewalk or other areas around the bins or along the storefront. 5. The bins shall not exceed 16 sq. ft. each, and shall be painted a neutral color to match the building. The bins may have the Byerly's name displayed on one side. 6. One pricing sign may be displayed for each bin. The signs shall be uniform in design, and shall not exceed the proposed 11" x 7" size. 7. No more than two propane cages shall be permitted. Placement of the propane cages shall be adjacent to the building and in compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances. 8. A revised site plan showing the new bin location and the propane cages shall be provided for inclusion in the Planned Development Amendment Agreement. A vote was taken. Aye: Member Keeley. Nay: Vice Chair Chavez, Members Dugan, Feller, and Jensen. Motion failed 1-4. Member Dugan moved, Member Fuller seconded a motion to recommend denial of a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of products at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, located in the S '/2 of Section 10 for the following reasons: 1. The proposed amendments were in effect before the application for Planned Development Amendment was approved. 2. The current display is in violation. 3. The applicant failed to appear at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting for explanation. A vote was taken: Aye: Vice Chair Chavez, Members Dugan, Feller, and Jensen. Nay: Member Keeley. Motion carried 4-1. I~~ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 14, 2006 CASE: 10-PA-11-07-06 APPLICANT: Byerly's HEARING DATE: August 22, 2006 PROPERTY OWNER: DDRA APPLICATION DATE: June 15, 2005 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 1299 Promenade Place COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SA/RC, Special Area/Retail Commercial ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REOUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, located in the S % of Section 10. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Eagan Promenade was platted in 1995 and the Byerly's store was constructed in 1996. In 1997, the City adopted a zoning amendment to permit a limited amount of outside display on commercially zoned properties. 1405 Planning Report - Byerly's September 19, 2006 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site contains an existing in-line retail center. The applicant, Byerly's, is an anchor tenant on the west end of the building. Other tenants include Barnes & Noble bookstore, Old Navy clothing, and Michael's craft store. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existin Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Wings Financial credit PD, Planned SA/RC, Special Area/ Retail union/ retail strip center Development Commercial (approved Jul 2006) East Retail PD, Planned SA/RC, Special Area/ Retail Development Commercial South Retail (movie rental/ PD, Planned SA/RC, Special Area/ Retail bank/ restaurants) Development Commercial West I-35E Ri ht-of--way EVALUATION OF REQUEST Proposal - Byerly's is proposing to amend the Planned Development Agreement to allow for outside display of products. The Eagan Promenade Planned Development was approved in 1995 and predates the City's ordinance: regarding outside displays. In 1997, the City Code was amended to allow for a limited amount of outdoor display i for commercial properties. Site Plan - Byerly's is proposing outside display of six 4' r w x 4' branded bins. The total bin display area proposed is 96 sq. ft. The proposed location of the bins is in front of the brick pillars to the left and right of the entrance, and in between the entrance and exit doors. Price signs are proposed to be posted on the bins for the displayed items. An example of the proposed pricing sign is attached. It is an 11" x 7" sheet with the item name and price on it. Code Requirements - The City Code allows outdoor display of merchandise or goods subject to the following standards: a. The display area shall not exceed 60 square feet. The proposed display area totals 96 sq. ft. The Byerly's store is approximately 60,000 sq. ft. The proposed 96 sq. ft. of display may be of a scale that is compatible with this size of retail store; the acceptability of the display area is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. Planning Report - Byerly's September 19, 2006 Page 3 b. The display area shall be located immediately adjacent to the principal structure and only on the side of the building which contains a main entrance. Two sets of bins are proposed to be located adjacent to the pillars on either side of the main entrance, not adjacent to the building wall. One set of bins is proposed to be free-standing in between the entrance and exit doors, not adjacent to any permanent structure, either pillar or building wall. c. The display area shall not extend more than five feet out from the building and shall not exceed four feet in height. The proposed bins are 48 " in height or less. However, the bins are proposed to be located more than five feet out from the building. d. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaping areas of the principal use. The proposed outside display is located on the sidewalk. The bins do not take up required parking spaces or landscaping areas, and placement does not conflict with pedestrian movement. e. The display items shall consists solely of products sold or distributed within the principal structure by the occupant thereof. The proposed bins will display fresh seasonal produce, products which are also sold inside the store. Evaluation - The proposal appears to comply with standards d and e. Items b and c are partially satisfied with regard to the height of the display and placement on the side of the building containing the main entrance. Items a and b regarding the size of the display area and the location of the bins adjacent to the building are not satisfied. Since two sets of the bins are proposed adjacent to permanent brick pillars, that placement could be construed as meeting the intent of item a, however, the free-standing bins do not satisfy this standard. City staff visited the site on September 12, 2006 and observed three bins in slightly different locations than shown on the proposed site plan. Two of the display bins were placed near the pillars, but A' between the pillar and building rather than in front ~ f of the pillars. The third bin was located between the entrance and exit doors. This scenario comes closer to compliance with the placement requirements of the City Code than the proposed six bins with i placement in front of the pillars. Additionally, the area of three bins is 48 sq. ft., which complies with the 60 sq. ft. maximum. On the site visit, staff also observed two propane tank cages in front of the building to the side of the main entrance. These propane cages should be included in the request as they are also a display item. The propane cages are each about 3.5' wide and 2' deep. Two of them total approximately 14 sq. ft. in area. The placement of the cages is flush against the building as N Is Planning Report - Byerly's September 19, 2006 Page 4 required by the ordinance, however, the cages are approximately 70" in height, which exceeds the 48" height limit for outside display. The three bins currently displayed, and the two propane cages contain a display area of approximately 62 sq. ft., which is very close to the 60 sq. ft. permitted by the City Ordinance. The six bins proposed by the applicant, along with the propane cages, total about 110 sq. ft. The acceptability of the ; height of the propane tanks, placement and number of bins deviate from the typical ordinance standards. Such deviations can be accommodated within the Planned Development ,..zoning and their acceptability is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION In summary, the applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of products at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place. The proposed outside display consists of six 4' x 4' bins placed in the sidewalk area adjacent to existing pillars and in front of the main entrance. The proposal complies with most of the ordinance standards regarding outside display. Staff recommends a modified plan based on the site visit which has three bins placed between the pillars and the building. Also, the existing propane cages should be considered as outside display, adding approximately 14 sq. ft.. Thus, the deviations include the amount of display area, the height of the propane cages, and the placement of the display bins. The acceptability of these deviations regarding bin placement and display area is a policy matter to be determined by City officials. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor display of products at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, located in the S % of Section 10. If approved the following conditions shall apply: 1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's office. 2. Fresh produce display shall be limited to three 4' x 4' bins located between the building and the pillars near the front entrance. 3. Outside display shall occur only between May 1 and November 15 of each year. 4. Outside display items shall consist only of fresh seasonal produce. All items displayed shall be confined to the bins themselves, and shall not extend onto the sidewalk or other areas around the bins or along the storefront. Planning Report - Byerly's September 19, 2006 Page 5 5. The bins shall not exceed 16 sq. ft. each, and shall be painted a neutral color to match the building. The bins may have the Byerly's name displayed on one side. 6. One pricing sign may be displayed for each bin. The signs shall be uniform in design, and shall not exceed the proposed 11" x 7" size. 7. No more than two propane cages shall be permitted. Placement of the propane cages shall be adjacent to the building and in compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances. 8. A revised site plan showing the new bin location and the propane cages shall be provided for inclusion in the Planned Development Amendment Agreement. 141 Eagan Boundary N Right-of-way Area a Par Location Map Park Are Park Area - Building Footprint 0 1 ~ rs =o. :B e, ~ a a r ~a "am ; ti L • e • w y~ ~a r o ~ ~ o ®,►nw } Subject Site a AP Q0 ~~l9f~asfafwf~ ~ s .wu 8 ~ = a~f a C ~ all t rvAHKEEDQADLLRQ= or 0 ® s ~t T-7 ~ ~ Illlls BIO IIII® i~ Bfa ♦ + AL i V -AMR, f ~ /~o.. ter. _ s a I wst a ..a Iloilo! ` _ r fa9®- fm ~U 1 / w+c.wm>..."' mrig 6r 11W WON 1 ~ ~ ~t"gge ~ A 7 ~ i~■ ~ ~i 1 0111" all Fool P% 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer.. Byerly's Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 10-PA-11-07-06 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcVlew 3.1. Parcel base map data. provided N by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of April 2005. 1Cit of Ea p `TJ r~ri,/) W+ E t' THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY S The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Community Development Dopartment not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Byerl(s Land Use Map PD Amendment 10-PA-11-07-06 Zoning Map R-4 PD BP R-4 PD „d` D Location r y Current Zoning: a PD PD PD JPD' PD Planned Development cooNn Novo WAS ff-Mff N D.U NwD) PD L CSC PD PD PD coo o coo 1200 F..t r-'- Comprehensive Guide Plan SA Land Use Map SA $A SA n~ ' Location O SA SA SA Current Land Use Designation: YSA! SA Lai 1,Y) Special Area COVMT/ ROM N0.2e (YANNp DOOeIN NOAO) t~E] SA SA rSA SA A SA coo o coo 1200 Feel Pareel base map information providedby Dakota County Land$-wy Departmed Deomber 2005. N 2-Ing Information maln/ainad byCity St.K r City of Eapn THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY 1 W E The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. s CIM, i, A V-L-- o ~ I s z o w a Q w ~ ~ J I I I ~ 1 N w - I FE z Q CD / ~i i i _L_fr i cry , 0 ~K = cwt v s C77 a s ~ I n n uj 0 w Q C--) II W rI v) 1 1 I ; i I I I I LU ~ i w a i a I I IlO-I Y r 111 1 \ 1 1 1 11 W W.~-•~ 1 a 1 1 1 J Y Q i~ i O N~ O ~ Q NO N R • N y N m N lid . m °s Lr) s pp f52 ~ Merchandising Plan-Byerly's Eagan Who: Byerly's Foods 1299 Promenade Place Eagan, MN 55121 Michael MacRae, General Manager 651-686-9669 What: Merchandise fresh seasonal produce items in 6 Byerly's branded 4 ft. by 4 ft. bins in front of the store. We are requesting total retail square footage of 96 feet. Current restrictions limit us to 60 square feet. (Please see picture of bin.) When: Each year from spring to fall as weather permits. May 1St thru November 15'h. Where: (See diagram.) Two bins will be located in front of the brick pillar to the left of the entrance. Two bins will be located in front of the brick pillar to the right of the entrance. Two bins will be located in between the exit and entrance doors. These bins will be positioned so as to have no effect on pedestrian traffic. Why: By leveraging this retail space we will enhance the freshness perception of our store and build sales. RECEIVED JUL 19 2006 (n )53 - 23 W o v S _ ~ is i o ~ z w (I enfj j -u u u T7 a Q w w L-L co W i•~ I --fir ~ MM I W ~ I i i j i ~ I I _ w ~ i i i I I ~ T O :V 55~~ ~lz ~ Q I I M6 D (1E C? ; 154 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - INTERSTATE PARTNERS ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east % of Section 2, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow temporary signage on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east '/z of Section 2, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes FACTS: ➢ The site is located on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road and has developed with an 8,180 square foot bank building with six drive-through service lanes, 50 parking stalls, and two free-standing ATM machines/lanes located in the southwest corner of the site. ➢ In 1997, amendments to this Planned Development were approved which allowed modifications to the parking lot, a building addition to relocate the main entrance/lobby of the bank and a second ATM drive-through lane. ➢ The applicant has indicated that the addition of a third ATM would allow them to better accommodate the high volume of traffic utilizing the ATM service and minimize stacking of vehicles. ➢ The staff report and the APC recommend modifications to the proposed landscaping and the applicant has indicated a willingness to work with staff in that regard. ➢ The APC held a Public Hearing on this item on September 19, 2006 and they are recommending approval. AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: October 14, 2006 ATTACHMENTS (2): September 19, 2006 draft APC Minutes on page ~ threesgk-» Staff Report on page 167 through 1 (08.. 155 Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 3 of 1 I B. Grand Oak Five - Time Out Bar Applicant Name: Interstate Partners Location: 2864 Highway 55; Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure. File Number: 02-PA-14-08-06 City Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated September 8, 2006. He noted the background and history. Matthew Miller, Interstate Partners, stated Interstate agrees with the conditions and he is available if there questions. Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Feller moved, Member Keeley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east'/2 of Section 2 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into an amended Planned Development Agreement that memorializes the approval of a detached enclosure. 2. The applicant shall record the amended Planned Development Agreement against Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five. 3. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan (with the Building Permit application) that illustrates additional plantings in the area of the enclosure. 4. The enclosure shall be located and constructed as shown on the Site/Details Plan sheet dated 8-16-06. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried: 5-0. Member Feller moved, Member Keeley seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow temporary signage on Lot 3, Block 1,Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east %2 of Section 2 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is allowed two temporary signs not to exceed a total of 50 SF. 2. The applicant is allowed to display two temporary signs until the Time Out Bar & Restaurant opens or December 31, 2006, whichever comes first. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried: 5-0. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 8, 2006 CASE: 02-PA-02-02-05 APPLICANT: Interstate Partners HEARING DATE: September 19, 2006 PROPERTY OWNER: Grand Oak, CR APPLICATION DATE: August 16, 2006 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendments PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley, AICP LOCATION: East '/z of Section 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Special Area 2 - Office/Service (OS) ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of Planned Development Amendments to allow the addition of a detached trash/recycling enclosure and to allow temporary signage in excess of 25 SF and for a period of time exceeding City Code standards for the larger of the two retail buildings on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at the northwest intersection of Highways 55 and 149 in the east/2 of Section 2. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.5 0, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY In 2004, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the designation from Special Area 2-Business Park to Special Area 2-Office/Service, a Rezoning of approximately 13.5 acres from Business Park to Planned Development, and a Preliminary Subdivision of approximately 13.5 acres to create four lots. The proposed buildings on the four lots are either complete or under construction. 15"1 Planning Report - Grand Oak Five PDA September 19, 2006 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Construction has been completed on the 20,0000 SF bank on Lot 2, the two retail buildings (13,000 SF total) on Lot 3 and the 30,000 SF office building on Lot 4. The 90,000 SF office building on Lot 1 (formerly occupied by the Imre "Triangle" building) is under construction. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Existing Use Zoning Land Use Designation North Grand Oak I & II BP Special Area 2 - BP South Office/Warehouse Limited Industrial IND East The Waters Office Park Planned Development Special Area 2 - O/S West Office & Off ce/Warehse BP Special Area 2 - BP EVALUATION OF REQUEST Amendments Trash Enclosure - Interstate Partners, LLC has secured a tenant to fill the remaining 7,000 SF of the retail building that currently houses Caribou Coffee. The applicant states that Time Out Bar & Restaurant has indicated that the existing shared trash area (located in the northwest part of the building) will be inadequate for their use. The City Code requires trash receptacles to be located within the building or in an enclosure attached to the building. The applicant has provided plans for a detached enclosure and stated that the existing trash area within the building is insufficient for the restaurant tenant needs and, further, they believe the detached enclosure is needed in order to maintain a high level of cleanliness and to avoid any sanitary concerns of an overcrowded trash room. The applicant has proposed the enclosure to be located adjacent to the southern most portion of the parking area. The applicant states: "The location was chosen to try and minimize the visibility of the enclosure. If it was constructed directly across from the kitchen exit it would be in the middle of open space between the building and Highway 55 and would appear more prominent than the building itself. In addition, we could not propose it on the north side of the building as there is no access from the kitchen on that side of the building. Because the enclosure is not directly across the parking lot from the kitchen access we will provide the tenant a oversized cart to load the trash in and to transport it to the enclosure minimizing any possible spills from leaky garbage bags." j 5g Planning Report - Grand Oak Five PDA September 19, 2006 Page 3 Planning staff does not dispute that assessment; however, the screening benefits at the proposed location are provided largely by existing mature vegetation which could be augmented with additional landscaping around the enclosure. The additional plantings are important due to the mature growth in the area being volunteer, deciduous and located within MnDOT r-o-w. Staff suggests the applicant add some new evergreen trees and foundation plantings around the enclosure to enhance the visual interest and soften the appearance of this addition. Temporary Signage - The applicant is also requesting approval of temporary signage that will exceed the amount and duration that is allowed by the Sign Ordinance. The Sign Ordinance allows temporary signage of up to 25 SF for no more than ten days out of any sixty day period. Specifically, the applicant is requesting to display two 25 SF temporary signs (Opening Soon & Now Hiring) from mid-October through December. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed amendments would allow a detached trash enclosure and temporary signage that exceeds square footage and duration standards of the City Code. The applicant is faced with a tenant mix that will result in trash/recycling needs greater than the original building design can accommodate. The enclosure amendment request proposes a proactive approach to avoid a future operational issue. The proposed temporary signage amendment is intended to provide visibility for the new 7,000 SF restaurant tenant as well as employment opportunities during the interior build out if the space. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east %2 of Section 2. If approved, the following conditions shall apply: 1. The applicant shall enter into an amended Planned Development Agreement that memorializes the approval of a detached enclosure. 2. The applicant shall record the amended Planned Development Agreement against Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five. 3. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan (with the Building Permit application) that illustrates additional plantings in the area of the enclosure. 4. The enclosure shall be located and constructed as shown on the Site/Details Plan sheet dated 8-16-06. (59 Planning Report - Grand Oak Five PDA September 19, 2006 Page 4 To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow temporary signage on Lot 3, Block 1,Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east %2 of Section 2. If approved, the following conditions shall apply: 1. The applicant is allowed two temporary signs not to exceed a total of 50 SF. 2. The applicant is allowed to display two temporary signs until the Time Out Bar & Restaurant opens or December 31, 2006, whichever comes first. I b.0 Eagan Boundary N}u~ Parcel Area Location Ma U Park Area - Building Footprint MENDOTA D Sub"ect Site a 9G Ce y_ ti ~ 1• ti~ =NIP= Pe L 4 o S , 90 ' R ■ 4 f ?4 ' . ~ j I LMJ ' Ar« :in 44 _ e 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. Grand Oak Five-Time Out Bar Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 02-PA-14-08-06 N Map Prepared using ERS1 Office of 3.1, reel base map pdata rig provided 1(01 w E by Dakota Counly of G1S and is is current as of April 2005. 005. City of EalaIl THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are S Community D.v.lopm.nt D.partment not responsible for errors or omissions. - _ o o loglil C> ti x~ o _ Y ` '-'PP - - 1rxS w L ix F { ~r kr wif ~ ft-, -3= r~ t v w ig ?Y t Y, R~_~ tt ~ I y _7 OF, 7 ~ y a~ 1 4- h F ICE b# ~ X ~ f ~ey f Y vp r l r ~ Al. sp, L-w il~Z rml :W ~~p¢ § elosauiny~t 'uE9E3 . a ~ ~ ~ VIVO GNVSD 1V SdOHS M gr a =f $s IV ams0l:)u3 ysL'Jl pasodoJd t F a gg #3; 2g6EgSd~iLp II 11 O LL II ~ ZVZ~ W! E 3 gz,~~ ~ II 11 11 II I I II I1 -vl '~H ~B~Rg 5~ 13 ' I I I HeR Olt ~pE~'r ~ aip III \ / h~ I I I~ I b I I W'p-.l,eMwhlriygi,gl~,wTln~1\~^Yt b ei,e .lw.ll s qq i Ydd 6 Q a y i4i -'1 C"'N 14 -Ztgi 2,~E7 IfV- 'ter o _ J cm y i r7l Mr. 7111 _ cin U-i 1, m at r K J 4 Him Im! 7 v ME;- ~ t Y~k11~ !,1ts ~ tkz~:d~[ta .iki~zd~lts F € ai °I li£!!!!!! his!----.... n !SR 2 ~ a~' ~ t E i!1 ffCf 13 ~ Uri UQ \ ' g 6 B ikskfj~tl~t .flslti i - C =R G di . Z ~°t R o ICI s F-I B` f bi ; x ~ oc i1 i i~i¢ ~ 0 000 S - O ~ E 4e f a r'Oe ; 0 0 0 >TV mom, S ti< ~ ,t r 4 " N ~ u 1 tk ~ n _ nl t . ~ 4 . 1 >r ~ f - rtY ] y ~w e tt t n ' eta a s ; at k rte Y y ti S- L I f 0 o u • X4 3,- 10 A Rig 1 J F 7 00 0 ro pp o2~ v r7 U ~O ~ b •o ~ ~ r15 ~ ~ ' l E 2 ~ .r a +~g y ,r .6-.0 0 o u o U a Q L z Vol a W a Z ~ 06 ao q i-7 z Q U ~s W J -(~g 1 r7 IrAdstate Nrblers Memorandum TO: Mike Ridley, City Planner, City of Eagan From: Matthew L. Miller, Investment Manager, Interstate Partners LLC Date: September 7, 2006 Re: Conditional Use Permit Interstate Partners LLC, as the managing member of Grand Oak Retail LLC, the owners of retail buildings know as the Shops at Grand Oak (13,000 SF) is requesting an amendment to the current PD zoning to allow for an additional trash enclosure and temporary signage to be allowed to be hung for more than the ten (10) days out of a sixty (60) day period as stipulated in the City's definition of temporary signage. This request is being made for the following reasons: 1. Time Out Bar & Restaurant, a tenant recently secured for the remaining square footage of the 2864 Highway 55 building has indicated the trash enclosure, as indicated on Exhibit A and attached hereto, that currently exists in the building is inadequate for their uses. Elevations of the proposed dumpster enclosure have been attached as Exhibit B and a rendering of the view of such enclosure from Highway O 55 has also been attached as Exhibit C. The location was chosen to try and minimize the visibility of the enclosure. If it was constructed directly across from the kitchen exit it would be in the middle of open ~v ti0~6 space between the building and Highway 55 and would appear more ~~Q ® prominent than the building itself. In addition, we could not propose it on the north side of the building as there is no access from the kitchen on that side of the building. Because the enclosure is not directly across the parking lot from the kitchen access we will provide the tenant a oversized cart to load the trash in and to transport it to the enclosure minimizing any possible spills from leaky garbage bags. We feel that this is needed in order to maintain a high level of cleanliness and to avoid any sanitary concerns of an overcrowded trash room. Additionally, we feel that this will have no adverse impact on the overall exterior appearance of the site.; and 2. Time Out would like to hang, affixed to the building one sign indicated that they will be "Opening Soon" and another sign displaying the fact that they are "Now Hiring". It is our intention that the signs would be hung until their projected opening of December 1, 2006, and no later than December 31, 2006, in case there are any delays in construction of their premises. In no case shall any temporary signs be hung until this application has gone before the Planning Commission and City Council. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Should you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me; I can be reached in the office at 651-406- 8050 or by e-mail at mmiller@interstatepartnersmn.com. 4 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - WELLS FARGO ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow a third automatic teller machine (ATM) for their facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road (Lot 1, Blockl, Norwest I" Addition) on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads in the SW'/4 of Section 10, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes FACTS: ➢ The site is located on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road and has developed with an 8,180 square foot bank building with six drive-through service lanes, 50 parking stalls, and two free-standing ATM machines/lanes located in the southwest corner of the site. ➢ The property was platted as Norwest 1St Addition and the bank was constructed in 1983. ➢ In 1997, amendments to this Planned Development were approved which allowed modifications to the parking lot, a building addition to relocate the main entrance/lobby of the bank and a second ATM drive-through lane. ➢ The applicant has indicated that the addition of a third ATM would allow them to better accommodate the high volume of traffic utilizing the ATM service and minimize stacking of vehicles. ➢ The staff report and the APC recommend modifications to the proposed landscaping and the applicant has indicated a willingness to work with staff in that regard. ➢ The APC held a Public Hearing on this item on September 19, 2006 and they are recommending approval. AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: October 14, 2006 ATTACHMENTS (2): September 19, 2006 draft APC Minutes on page I7b t&-@• 4 - Staff Report on page through 1} I~ Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 4 of 11 C. Wells Fargo Bank Applicant Name:The Design Partnership Location:3390 Pilot Knob Road; Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1st Addition Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment to allow a 3rd ATM machine and a drive lane. File Number: 10-PA-13-08-06 City Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated September 20, 2006. He noted the background and history. Victor Peribachs, Architect stated agreement with the Staff report and stated they will work with Staff regarding the landscaping plan. Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Jensen moved, Member Feller seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment amending the Site Plan to allow the addition of a third ATM for Wells Fargo Bank at 3390 Pilot Knob Road, Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 15t Addition in the SW '/4 of Section 10 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a Planned Development Amendment Agreement with the City and record same against Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1 s' Addition. 2. The installation of the third ATM and widening of the drive aisle shall comply with the Site Plan dated August 16, 2006, and the three ATMs shall--have the same appearance. 3. The applicant shall provide (with the Building Permit application) a revised Landscape Plan that adds a grouping of non-evergreen ornamental trees in the area east and north of the pylon sign to improve and balance the aesthetics at this high profile intersection. 4. The applicant shall provide grading and drainage information with the Building Permit application. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried: 5-0. I PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 12, 2006 CASE: 10-PA-13-08-06 APPLICANT: The Design Partnership HEARING DATE: September 19, 2006 PROPERTY OWNER: Wells Fargo PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley, AICP REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment LOCATION: 3390 Pilot Knob Road, Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest I' Addition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CA, Central Area ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Design Partnership, on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, is requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow the addition of a third automatic teller machine (ATM) for their facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road (Lot 1, Blockl, Norwest 1St Addition) on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads in the SW '/a of Section 10. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11.40, Subd. 5, Amendments (Including Zoning) states in part that zoning amendments may be initiated by the property owner, Planning commission or City Council. Such requests require a public hearing, and approval requires an affirmative vote of 2/3rds of all members of the Council. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property was platted as Norwest 1St Addition in 1983. At that time a Planned Development was approved and a Planned Development Agreement executed which provided for the construction of a bank facility. The bank was constructed in 1983. In 1997, amendments to this Planned Development were approved which allowed modifications to the parking lot, a building addition to relocate the main entrance/lobby of the bank and a second ATM drive-through lane. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is developed with an 8,180 square foot bank building with six drive-through service lanes, 50 parking stalls, and two free-standing ATM machines/lanes located in the southwest corner of the site. I~~ Planning Report - Wells Fargo PDA September 19, 2006 Page 2 SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject site: North - Medical clinic; Zoned PD, Planned Development; Guided Central Area South - Eagan Station - MVTA Park and Ride lot and I-35E East - Extended Stay America Hotel, Zoned PD, Planned Development; Guided Central Area West - Lockheed Martin; Zoned RD, Research and Development; Guided Central Area EVALUATION OF REQUEST Description of Proposal - Wells Fargo is proposing to install a third ATM near the existing ATM at the southwest corner of the site. The ATM machines at this Wells site handle a very high volume of traffic and number of transactions. The applicant has indicated that the addition of a third ATM would allow them to better accommodate the high volume of traffic utilizing the ATM service and minimize stacking of vehicles. Site Plan - As proposed, the drive lane would be widened, adding approximately 560 square feet of pavement, and some existing landscape materials would be relocated. The proposed ATM should match the existing ATM in appearance. Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The Wells Fargo Bank is located on the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. This intersection is one of the most heavily traveled and high profile intersections in the City. Consequently, with the convenience of the existing drive-up ATM machines, the amount of traffic and visibility of the bank and ATM machines, a large number of transactions occur at this drive-through facility. Access/Street Design - To accommodate a second drive-up ATM, the existing drive lane is proposed to be widened from 34.5 to 44 feet. The three ATMs would have separate drive lanes and a bypass lane would continue to be provided. The existing and new ATM machines will sit on 3.5 foot wide concrete islands. The area of the proposed ATM is generally flat and should accommodate the drive aisle expansion; however, a minor amount of grading will be necessary to provide a slope away from the curb and gutter. Landscaping - The Landscape Plan is acceptable, with modifications. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing landscaping at this corner. Five existing cedar trees of various shapes and sizes will be removed as part of the construction for the new drive lanes and ATM kiosk. The new plan design replaces the cedar trees with lower growing arborvitae that will, at maturity, screen the vehicles and grow to approximately 5' tall. The Wells Fargo Bank parking and ATM areas are approximately three to six feet below the elevation of the Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob road intersection. Staff suggests additional landscaping in the area east and north of the pylon sign, such as a grouping of ornamental trees Planning Report - Wells Fargo PDA September 19, 2006 Page 3 should be provided to add a non-evergreen landscape element and improve aesthetics at this high profile intersection. These changes should update and balance the appearance of the southwest corner of a site developed almost twenty-five years ago. Grading/Storm Drainage/Water Quality - Existing storm water runoff patterns will not be altered. The added impervious surface associated with the proposed change is negligible and its impact on runoff quantities and water quality insignificant. This grading work and drainage patterns should be illustrated on plans submitted for the Building Permit. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The Design Partnership, on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, is proposing to install a third ATM in the southwest corner of their site. The new ATM and relocated bypass lane can be accommodated on the site in the area proposed. Proposed (and suggested) changes to the existing landscaping should enhance and update the appearance of the site at this high profile intersection. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Planned Development Amendment amending the Site Plan to allow the addition of a third ATM for Wells Fargo Bank at 3390 Pilot Knob Road, Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1St Addition in the SW t/4 of Section 10. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The applicant shall enter into a Planned Development Amendment Agreement with the City and record same against Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest I" Addition. 2. The installation of the third ATM and widening of the drive aisle shall comply with the Site Plan dated August 16, 2006, and the three ATMs shall have the same appearance. 3. The applicant shall provide (with the Building Permit application) a revised Landscape Plan that adds a grouping of non-evergreen ornamental trees in the area east and north of the pylon sign to improve and balance the aesthetics at this high profile intersection. 4. The applicant shall provide grading and drainage information with the Building Permit application. 1-73 Eagan Boundary N Right-of-way Location Map Park Area Area - Building Footprint INS r.. w- ® r■ ti- y•~e ti 6 • w f L r c~ ~ f Y ■ V Subject Site r D s v ~ J r 4r ~ Do ° - i t MEN fa, g , II J- i -L ...,.R. e 0*9 . ~r a ® ~f q~ 4*k* 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. Wells Fargo Bank Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 10-PA-13-08-06 N RSJ Map Prepared using y O oe of w 3.1. Parcel base map data provided I by Dakota County OtFlce of GIS and is current as of April 2005. City of Eatu THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w E The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. ~ r s. 4L M% MWIMMO * 81 ~ r " F dPl ar , w a>. T' M5 Vim 4, JL ' VIOBJrwN TH'JV3 umtr~wPwm~m+m ioWrn VOmw« YsMRTM - NauV/dB YLLV 'Ql iOMl tauOlK amw<ur a a vw.v.tiww.~~ f1' -~rrugW aim ~wv.e ~>p~ erw.a wv,w~ao .muwmi ° wvdwa a ~ ~ - 'P1l'diysiaup u6isaa ayl i- D ~ t D ~x a 6Q(\/I~~\f1 \ D O \ 0 rg S~ ~ 8 OQ ~ z O y a it ~~QOOo - ' 2 Q M 000° 1 ly b ly- _ D - D C-i ° t LLJ C/) e ~ F UJ W Z pp Q - - 000 ' s D I C 3 ~ z ~ $ v 4 ~ t a ne@ g ~ sle L t = Aio e§ 6 e~ 0 p 5 g z y a Si JF it` p¢ CR it 4 o a v t~ 4 wa gs 5i a g ~ 96 (7 to F tS C Z Z Z_ Q Q J D y1d Z J ' !F Z p 4 S a tlb <Z t.I i1 (X0 F" i 41 Z b9 a 1 I I z 40 @v ~ ,.f I ! pw ga de t^ y~~e / Y I I ZZ ,Za sLatn af mw f v'/li'i F TF' 6 I ~ 5 y t '41 "V 3 { h Xf-0166%.Y- ,per ,p, ~ I / ~ tt ! ! d F RA"~i r p F f 16~ i I aE {v l e ~ _ Qvou ao,vx 107id \ R a o t# N i aY. i• } ~ yt t t1 N YR ! t x it Li i ka gg As ~ f i ! {i S~i € 1 b { ~ ~ ~ SE ii ifiE Y6i! LU s # Oz y t i II f t i.;" E 811, 1" f 'da t $ S p$e "Pf : f E t~~ tyt t it=3! y= f ~ ~a ~ t~g6 f Et t a E Pit q ~ S ~ r 'gatt tq Ilis ~ P of j: ; f " p~ R 3~ 9 + i # u Tft tit ; adQ y : t $E t~~ 1° B~d F F s~ F R t R~ f a~ s f fj 9 t 3{ k ~p i.! 8. Eq f=7 P t t•t y"8 t e.§ i t f f ai~ ~t" R..~ f[ t' a S 6f Rf R V t! d tt3 t ~ ~ a 4( ~ t' ~ Pn:t.R dtCsR ~ d ~ 3@ S qS vty tEI, III tFh fi t t .yf ~9§ d r i= , d. fE§!~§ i e t t F t c ~ EiB t ~ESita P tti is p d a! SP6`~ d F ~i S St~! za x t ; rt. z 8~" i6 ggt ¢et ~ d€ ;8~~ ~E E f E ' t ~ ~ gg y5 t ~o,,tt6l3f ~/g~ f[ tdaiE~`E~Et d of t{'x ~1 qz fx§{& q§dls ` 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tf a R t o"t EP ; I'P E ,f 6 T. R- t[~R a ! 4 t{saF a~. I ~ Z' ~ ~ ~ Id s I g~ S adaa s § I tt°a t pt~t 5a t, ~ g { • R~ a°t! t ax' i` t a Si ` d ;t Rzt t'--„ : ` tS , t pt ~ ~ R S. t, tE 4 y .+y ~iit d dP li§~.gt o t il~ i`d d~. a .f 311' ltt1 0 t si IS Ss i f~E ~ ~ f; gt, s~ t E 1 - ~ 6~ W R ttFif • t , ~f sF~t, fR RQ ~S'Tflfas iR~tgq99 !f$atSIitatln• + P ! tf' EE s ~g ~js Stiy e t 6z{~ ;iTi 4 fd i 1 ~g !t s"S z~..... t!~ i ai~ tt~ '3 R Rq F S g v t ea @;SSfYdi !i' i 4i~~4~ a ~ii ~ I~ ~g1 9{ ~ a' ~~9p i #ftstRt r'ErE ~4: 91 il11110 i z di ~ ~ y _ a f - U a Fb , s„ iR i ~a V r~ k l r~~ C= Q ~S S t . W [JJ K i+u S W i ~yv IF- 1 1r hT • Q V r 1 ~J J t. tbti ~ r "kta ~ r~,c 6 e I, W tIII ~ "L ~ s r ? tyjar" 1 ` . 17 C's V- a; n=om G-` _ ~ ~ "TJ s p ,k.,.W Project Narrative Wells Fargo desires to add a 3`a ATM in the same location near the SW corner of their property as the existing two ATM units. The purpose of this project is to accommodate the increase in volume of people using the drive-thru service without compromising the customer's convenience. The project involves approximately 560 square feet added bituminous drive, and equivalent loss of green space. Landscape plantings will be replaced in equal numbers, and a minor amount of grading is necessary to slope away from the new curb and gutter location. All affected areas will be re-sodded. Stormwater runoff from the new bituminous area will be contained in the existing hard surfaced areas, so no new utilities are necessary for this work. Existing electrical service will be extended underground to serve the new ATM unit, and one (1) light pole will be relocated to the new curb line. The result of this project is improved customer service for the property owner with very minimal impact on the existing site. RECEIVED AUG 1 6 2006 Agenda Information Memo October 3, 2006 Eagan City Council D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - SUPERIOR AUTO CENTER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve (or direct Findings of Fact for Denial) a Planned Development Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive on Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition located in the NE 1/4 of Section 16 subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: At least three votes FACTS: ➢ The applicant is proposing a PD Amendment for a remodeling and addition to the existing 5,600 SF automobile service facility located on Washington Drive just south of Yankee Doodle Road on Lot 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition. Lot 1, adjacent to the west, is paved but otherwise undeveloped. ➢ Combined, the two lots equal approximately 1.2 acres. The building was built in 1978 and has operated as an auto service center since that time. ➢ The existing facility is located between two office buildings to the south and the rear or service area of the Yankee Square shopping center and the Al Baker's restaurant is located immediately to the east. ➢ The expansion will introduce a new use to the area; all operations will continue to be conducted indoors. Additionally, all auto storage and employee parking will occur in an area enclosed with an 8' tall privacy fence. ➢ The proposed use, at this location, appears generally compatible with surrounding uses and the development plan looks to provide some visual benefit to the surrounding area and uses. ➢ Superior Collision is pursuing this site alternative in order to relocate from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. The City is in separate discussions with Superior regarding acquisition of its current site and the ultimate relocation of the business to a new site. ➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 2006 and the Commission is recommending approval of the amendment. 18I ISSUES: The property owner of the adjacent retail center to the north and office buildings further south, across Washington Drive, has submitted a letter in opposition to the addition of the collision repair operation and concern about parking and snow removal. ➢ The APC stated their belief that the design of the building addition to contain all operations and the upgrade in materials would benefit the area and that parking and snow removal were adequately addressed. AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: October 14, 2006 ATTACHMENTS (4): September 19, 2006 draft APC Minutes on pagesl83 through% Staff Report on pagesJ96 through ges Supplemental staff memo regarding finish materials &5hrough Letter in opposition from MFC Properties on pages I Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 5 of 11 D. Superior Auto Center Applicant Name:Superior Collision Center Location:3425 Washington Drive; Lot 1 & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial Third Addition Application: Planned Development Amendment A Planned Development Amendment for an expansion of an existing auto service center to include collision repair service. File Number: 16-PA-15-08-06 City Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff report dated September 12, 2006. He noted the background and history. Quinn Hutson, CNH Architects, discussed the building materials, screening, size of the site, drive lane, parking, and the visibility from major roadways. Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Keeley stated the proposed plan and upgrades to the existing structure will be a positive change to property and area. Member Dugan asked staff about building materials standards. City Planner Ridley summarized the memorandum provided to the APC and the materials common to the buildings in the vicinity. He further stated that the exact application of the finish standards on a re-use/re-model is a policy decision for the APC and City Council. Member Chavez stated he was supportive of the proposed finishes and that it unrealistic and unfair to impose full finish standards on a building/expansion that is surrounded on all sides by buildings that also do not meet the City's current standards. Member Dugan inquired about the building setback, snow removal, greenspace and noise/odor from the site. Mr. Hutson "explained that the design of the facility with an entrance door at either end versus an overhead door to the exterior for each service bay will eliminate noise or smells and amy actually result in the site being quieter than it is today. He stated there is a small reduction of greenspace, howeverwith the additional landscaping; the lost greenspace has been compensated for. He explained how the proposed amount of parking is more than adequate. He stated snow removal is not a concern due to the size of the site; however the snow will be taken off site if necessary. Member Keeley moved, Member Jensen seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive on Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3`d Addition located in the NE '/4 of Section 16 subject to the following conditions: X33 Advisory Planning Commission Minutes September 19, 2006 Page 6 of I 1 1. The applicant shall execute and record a Planned Development Agreement at Dakota County within 60 days of the date of Council approval and proof of its recording be provided to the City. 2. The two parcels shall be replatted into one lot. 3. The replatted parcel shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the site. 4. All maintenance, detailing and collision repair shall only occur inside the building. 5. New and updated building facades shall be constructed per the submitted elevation plan dated 8-16-06. 6. The outdoor storage area, as depicted on the Site Plan dated 8-16-06, shall be enclosed by an opaque, 8' tall privacy fence. 7. All employee and vehicles in the service queue shall be located in the enclosed storage area. 8. In no instance shall customer vehicles be parked overnight outside of the enclosure. 9. Landscaping shall be installed as shown on the plan dated 8-16-06. A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion carried: 5-0. 184 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 12, 2006 CASE: 16-PA-15-08-06 APPLICANT: Dan Sjolseth HEARING DATE: September 19, 2006 PROPERTY OWNER: Shirley Rabuse APPLICATION DATE: August 16, 2006 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley, AICP LOCATION: 3425 Washington Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SA, Special Area ZONING: PD, Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST Dan Sjolseth, Superior Collision Center, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive on Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition located in the NE 1/4 of Section 16. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subdivision 5 states, in part, 1. The provisions of this chapter may be amended by the majority vote of the council, except that amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any district may only be made by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of all members of the council. 2. The Council shall not rezone any land in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for its consideration and recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The 5,600 SF auto service center on Lot 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition was built in 1978 and has operated as such since that time. Lot 1, adjacent to the west, is paved but otherwise undeveloped. 185 Planning Report - Superior Auto Center PDA September 19, 2006 Page 2 The 12,200 SF Superior Collision building at 3985 Cedarview Drive was constructed in 1988 and has operated as an auto collision & paint service center since that time. EXISTING CONDITIONS Combined, the two lots equal approximately 1.2 acres. As mentioned previously, the auto service use has operated at the subject site for almost thirty years. The existing facility is located between two office buildings to the south and the rear or service area of the Yankee Square shopping center and the Al Baker's restaurant is located immediately to the east. SURROUNDING USES The subject property is surrounded by office, hotel, restaurant and retail uses all of which are zoned Planned Development and guided Special Area. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area - This Special Area provides a mix of office, retail and service uses. The existing auto service use has operated in the area for many years and while the collision/paint service expansion will introduce a new use to the area, all operations will continue to be conducted indoors. Additionally, all auto storage and employee parking will occur in area enclosed with an 8' privacy fence. The proposed use appears generally compatible with surrounding uses and the development plan looks to provide some visual benefit to the surrounding area and uses. Proposal - The applicant is proposing this PD Amendment for a remodeling and addition to the existing automobile service facility. "The proposed 12,500 SF addition along with the original building (5,600 SF) will combine the auto service functions currently at this site with the relocated collision center from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. This expanded facility will be the only business in Eagan that provides customers with complete vehicle care within one location including service and maintenance, detailing and collision repair." The applicant also states: "The expansion along with the enclosed outdoor storage area will be built on under-used existing bituminous paving for the auto service facility at the back of the existing strip retail center and will not change the current basic land use on the site." Currently, views from the office buildings to the south of the site are of the rear or service area of the retail center. The proposal includes the expansion of the auto service center and also an upgrade in appearance of the existing building to match the expansion with the addition of brick veneer, cast stone trim, pre-finished metal canopy, new overhead doors and new landscaping. Outdoor Storage - The enclosed outdoor storage area will be utilized for vehicles in the queue for repair (and those awaiting pick up after repairs are complete) and employee parking. The 1 Planning Report - Superior Auto Center PDA September 19, 2006 Page 3 applicant is proposing an opaque 8' foot tall polyvinyl fence enclosure. The post and rail style fence will allow for the preservation of existing trees along the south fence line. Setbacks - The existing auto service building is set back 5' from the rear or south property line. The City Code typically requires a setback of 20'. The applicant is proposing a 1' setback for the addition. This deviation can be allowed via the PD. The applicant states the purpose for this reduced setback is due to the narrowness (90') of the lot. "The minimum building width that can function for this use is 74' clear inside which is arrived at by adding two 25' deep repair stalls to a 24' center drive lane." This configuration results in an overhead door only at the east and west end of the building expansion and not an individual overhead door for each service bay. Parking - The Site Plan provides five customer parking stalls adjacent to the existing building. All employee parking will occur within the privacy enclosure west of the proposed addition. Green Space - Commercial lots are currently subject to a green space requirement of 30%. The existing conditions at the subject site result in a 16.5% green space. As proposed, the building addition will reduce the green space to 7.4 Landscaping - The Landscape Plan is acceptable. The applicant is proposing to provide new landscaping on the east end of the existing building and the islands near Washington Drive. In addition to saving six of the nine existing along the southern property line, new landscaping to augment those trees is proposed along the entire southern boundary line, west of the new building addition. Replat/Easements - The two existing parcels will need to be replatted into a single parcel because the building addition will not be allowed to cross a property line. The Bicentennial P Addition was platted prior to the City requiring drainage and utility easements along the property lines. The replatted parcel should dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the site. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow for a combination/re-use of a building and use that has existed since the late 1970's. The proposed amendment will result in the combination of the auto service functions currently at this site with a relocated collision center. Deviations from straight zoning standards include building setback, green space and the repair operation. The advantages suggested for this re-use are the higher use of underutilized property (primarily paved parking lot) in the City's Central Area, an architectural update and expansion of a 28 year old commercial building, a landscape update, the addition of a physical screen between office buildings to the south and the rear/service area of the Yankee Square shopping center to the north Planning Report - Superior Auto Center PDA September 19, 2006 Page 4 and a relocation receiver site for a use currently located in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive on Lots I & 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition located in the NE 1/4 of Section 16. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall execute and record a Planned Development Agreement at.Dakota County within 60 days of the date of Council approval and proof of its recording be provided to the City. 2. The two parcels shall be replatted into one lot. 3. The replatted parcel shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the site. 4. All maintenance, detailing and collision repair shall only occur inside the building. 5. New and updated building facades shall be constructed per the submitted elevation plan dated 8-16-06. 6. The outdoor storage area, as depicted on the Site Plan dated 8-16-06, shall be enclosed by an opaque, 8' tall privacy fence. 7. Only employee vehicles and vehicles in the service queue shall be stored in the enclosed storage area. 8. In no instance shall customer vehicles be parked overnight outside of the enclosure. 9. Landscaping shall be installed as shown on the plan dated 8-16-06. I~ Eagan Boundary Right-of-way Para Location Map [71 ParkArea k Area - Building Footprint • w ~ e ti B woaft , 91k i ~f a; a ~Ina! ! • • t I' ~ f Sub-ect Site ■ r * 11 J ~ Jbw 40 NMI Ba, CO ° i -0 wlyl "Ummmus 1wr an .1"I f r ♦ i ` ` •~i IE t e l P♦ ♦ + p~ i • 3 r -4 i F* s, [ ■ 9• g • ♦ ! ■1 , r ` w ~ W d man IN e o o s 'e o 1DOD 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. Superior Auto Center Application: Planned Development Amendment Case No.: 16-PA-15-08-06 Map Prepared using FRSI ArcViiew 3.1. Parcel base map data provided N by Dakota County Office of GIS and is current as of April 2005. I~ City of Eapn THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are IS Commanity Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. ~ s . il F 3 ML-M ~ ~ • ~ ZR~a ~ ~ ~ 'mot T.r~ 4Mj t A z- s NMI w. *44 v~ 4 3,~ 1 . T 4 ' Y 90019 ` 9nV 03AI3038 -`4NN1 'WW3 V30 o c NOIS11103 UOIU3dnS Q o F 1-- k i w R C 4 \ O 1 I I\ ~ I\ d m I w I\I I 1 } I I ~ ~\f aY I i I \ I 1 1 I ❑ \ r, i 4 t 'I I ~ I ~I I . I I I I I ,r I ~ d I I ' \ 1 1 I `gyp \ I ~ ~ I 1 I I 1 I 1~ I I 11 n 1 ~ ! / I ~ Y \ m \\\'i I \t i ~I s Z g 1Yrof/NY. ~LPY i1M awlsewe•W - ianiwroW. n.p{~.n~i.c.~,pp.pY~yn•..q•.Au I I 9002 NOLLVAON3U V1053NNIW 'NY9V3 ~ ~ Zaa 8 i 9E G NOIS11103 dOlH3dns an G r n Q r u 1 I7 i i a Y J\ Y or IE fi rs. +p r- Y I I o pA - . - Tfi N Z (1I~~11, 2 v Z s aeJN muw M aoweM.w.nv- i r.iwM.e i..~.e i .,p~wan•. L I • it 9ooz 9 a Jna 03AI333N $ NOOYAOr g g YLU53NNIVI 'NYOY3 Yp. Ma o NOISIll03 liOlN3dnS mill ~so CO ~zLi hi L- a a gill a 114 N o i l RHO OW ~ a p Ww h LL I W N ~ N i iZ E Z +eWNm muou uw .nwuf~.. er-ie..iw"s~.•~..n.fVe. i...Q,ap.p~gpyq. p.fe.dd I 5 90OZ 9 t JnV 03AI3338 y~ n IW U tz +i vm>fuw is vs ~u xwi in esa NDLLYADN3N g Y1053NNIM 'NVDY3 va a Nolsm= 80i83ans HAT LU 95 i ,i n- I ~e~ bh I F II Va I ' I 6~c 1\ ~ w 1 III ,\(y III I 1 \ rs I ~ I . \ I I I I \ tai-r~'~~t. ~ I f \F tt iti Iji • ~i I I I ~ 1{f '.1 f p t3 ! ~ w V' s4`1, Q~ ~ I II pip III~M` X11 ~ !<ktt xi I 1 91, I P 61 d I r .>t i L I t I I I - I I I II I I I \ I X", I 1 , \ I I A- I I I I, I 1 1 ~ \ 1\ \ ~ I I I \ - - - •mpNm ~ioa um ...ee-aMeew - iett~wMaei.•a-f~eeui.o,CtoMiCtmeA•~a.le,dtd • ~n goon g ` 9nd 03AI3338 a L~,tMO ~il1iC r'1TM lYY 16 lli 1LIi NtN l~ Y[ u,w•~gtNnM ~ _ $g NouvnoN3u DLOL•LLE4 DOsz-aung-A R n V1053NNIP'NVDV3 9L6ss■loseuugs spdeauugyy®© ,~Je..~.,m:e L sm^V~0301% NOISIII03 aOld3dflS J P" U016UPPHION PIG i_ xgjE4 sic 7 b;;" 111 CO i jib \\1► Y« l{1 tt fls OEM! t c E' a^-jb xy U a1 O O O IL I I Y^ a I I I I 6j{t _ i~ II I I b t 6~ ~33~ J X L I it I it ' ~z ~F ~2 E = E B~zB e~ spxp S ,i ~ yzE o j i ~ ~8 phi ib~ tt ESjLt[ N U +~S fBC:pCH~. LOa a C:6 'F+ i~ W ? U j F N { 2 N J O I I W a 41 3 _ O Y^ a y 0 I ~ J I C I :l I I - s" / W U I KO o , G O g f m e S. 2 o S, z L s 5 . e i ~Ba r-s H a o ¢o a s j @ of N Z 3 Sb 3 m c N#yg E 5.1 'HF Ssa gk 4 as S y t- F 411111 E a Z r .sL g a O NN S F oA~ g { ~ a Q[R ■ m ~~D <mo w o < Y~ a w a o g ~nT$ §ac~1M8 \ 0.1 j W $ Em y !m" I g i w m¢Qyy VOIC 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 - 7580 (952) 431 - 4433 Planned Development Amendment Narrative Superior Collision Center August 16, 2006 This Planned Development Amendment is for a remodeling and addition to the existing automobile service facility at 3425 Washington Drive. The proposed 12,500 square foot addition along with the original building will combine the auto service functions currently at this site with the relocated collision center from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District. This expanded facility will be the only business in Eagan that provides customers with complete vehicle care within one location including service and maintenance, detailing, and collision repair. The combination of the two businesses will strengthen both, provide needed vehicle services to this section of the city, and keep the collision center within Eagan. The project is intended to begin early Spring, 2007, with completion late in Summer. The expansion along with the enclosed outdoor storage area will be built on under-used existing bituminous paving for the auto service facility at the back side of the existing strip retail center and will not change the current basic land-use on the site. This site is surrounded by a restaurant and two gas stations on the east, the back of an existing strip retail center on the north and west, and finally two story office buildings to the south. The remodeled building and addition will provide improved views from all neighboring properties. In particular, the office tenant's view of the painted plain concrete block service area of the strip mall back along with an assortment of trash dumpsters (see Attachment 1 for existing views) will now be screened by the new building addition and new fence surrounding the outside storage and parking area. The existing facility is upgraded with the following materials including additional brick veneer, new cast stone trim, new prefinished metal canopy, new overhead doors, and significant new landscaping. The addition makes use of brick pilasters with cast stone trim, three tones of rockface and burnished decorative block, aluminum storefront windows, and accent medallions (see Attachment 2 for new facades). These materials were selected to blend with the existing building and provide a pleasing image on all sides, with special attention paid to the south elevation. The existing painted concrete block on the original building that is not covered with new brick is to be painted to match the two tones of rockface block on the addition. The amount of brick and cast stone used on the addition is sized and positioned to carefully visually balance the desire for an upgraded aesthetic while not overpowering the existing building. This moderate proportion of brick is in keeping with the buildings within this area that either are precast RECEIVED ALC 16 2006 ~ I panels without brick, such as the office buildings, or use small amounts of brick as an accent. The outdoor storage and parking area will be screened with an 8 foot high decorative polyvinyl privacy fence (see Attachment 3) that was selected for its low-maintenance, attractive appearance. A post and rail style fence design is used to allow for the preservation of the existing trees along the south fence which would not have been possible with any fence wall requiring a continuous frost footing. The area between the existing trees will have extensive landscaping including perennials, shrubs and evergreens for year round impact. As noted above, the project minimizes the impact on the existing trees. The site currently has nine existing ash trees of which six will be preserved as shown on the landscape plan. In addition, the landscaping will add a variety of new shrubs, perennials and one new tree to result in a varied blend of sizes and types. The plan also makes use of evergreens to provide year round color. Other than the improved views noted above, the addition presented in this PD Amendment will have little impact on the surrounding land uses. The additional traffic for the relocated collision operations is minimal since only a few daily customer trips are generated by this use and are relatively insignificant compared to the adjacent retail, restaurant and convenience store businesses. The noise levels will actually decrease since the maintenance stalls are to be relocated to the interior loaded service bays of the addition instead of the current exterior accessed overhead doors that are typically open during non-winter months. The current exterior loaded bays will transform into three estimate bays and two detailing bays, both more customer oriented, light uses. The building addition under this PD amendment provides for a zero lot line building along the south side of the site. The main wall is actual 1 foot off the property line with the brick pilasters extending to within 4 inches of the site edge. While this is 5 feet closer to the property line than the existing building, it is necessitated by the narrow site width of 90 feet. The minimum building width that can function for this use is 74' clear inside which is arrived at by adding two 25' deep repair stalls to a 24' center drive lane. When this minimum building is added to a single lane access drive along the north side of the building and the wall thicknesses, there is no additional space left. All other building setbacks meet the underlying zoning requirements. The new facility will have only minimal impact on City services with only slightly increased sewer loads, virtually no increase in impervious surface nor change in stormwater flow compared to the existing paved site, and only a minor increase in vehicle trips. The water service will be upgraded to an 8" line to allow for the installation of a fire suppression system throughout the new facility which results in a significantly decreased fire risk for the structure. The new businesses will include revised signage as indicated on the submittal plans. The new signage areas are positioned over the existing lobby windows on both elevations at 'RECEIVED At.15' 1 q1 the northeast corner of the building and are significantly smaller than the 20% of the building elevation allowed by ordinance. In addition, the project will include a monument sign at the east side of the site incorporating the rockface block and cast stone trim of the building. In summary, this proposal will provide a new home for a long-standing Eagan business relocated from the current Cedar Grove Redevelopment District as desired by the long range plans set by the City of Eagan. The under-used paved west lot will now provide a productive, beneficial function to strengthen the vitality of this planned development site. The design and materials of the project are carefully selected to provide a pleasing, compatible aesthetic and allow for an improved view from the street and adjacent offices to the south And finally, the current service business will be reinforced with this new compatible use and will serve the residents and workers of this section of Eagan with the city's only full service vehicle center. RECEIVED AUG n.m 10 I~~ 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 - 7580 (952) 431 - 4433 Planned Development Amendment - Superior Collision Center Attachment 1 . _I ?i Y - kiwi= N View from office towards future building addition and end of existing building. a_ ..a 71, r F & _ View of back of existing strip mall center showing painted block, gas services and exposed trash dumpsters. View from office building towards storage lot fence and new landscaping. RECEIVED ` ' . II f I 1 ka' 4 n ~n k,' JJ J y= i/1 V1 p G' K'. f Ate. ^y O O N CD LO W r., iii- - LJLF V I C Z .5 W FYI O 12 W W lj Z oC W O CO 0 r Z Z O CL W~ U u~i LU W O ~°o A J 400 W W n/ oN H F- z w 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 - 7580 (952) 431 - 4433 Planned Development Amendment - Superior Collision Center Attachment 3 Close up image of 8' high polyvinyl privacy fence (Dick's Valley Towing) Overall image of 8' high polyvinyl privacy fence (Dick's Valley Towing) RECEIVED AUG 16 2006 City of ENle~o To: Chair Hansen and Advisory Planning Commission Members From: Mike Ridley, City Planner.41F - Date: September 19, 2006 Subject: Superior Auto Center - Building Finish Standards A more thorough discussion on building materials was not provided in the staff report and additional information has been provided relative to before and after comparisons on the proposed finish materials for the existing building and proposed expansion of same. Back round Adopted by Council earlier this year, the material finish standards require commercial buildings have at least 65% Class I materials (made up of at least three different materials), no more than 35% Class II or Class III materials and no more than 10% of Class IV materials. Class I: Brick, stone, glass, copper panels or other comparable or superior materials. Class II: Specialty concrete block (textured, burnished, rock faced), or Masonry stucco. Class III: Exterior finish installation system (EFIS), architectural pre-cast textured concrete panels, opaque panels and ornamental metal. Class IV: Smooth concrete block, smooth scored concrete block, smooth concrete tip up panels, ceramic or glass block. Existing Conditions The existing building is 8.4% Class I materials (glass, brick) and 91.6% Class IV (painted block). Proposal The proposed building (existing + expansion) calls for 7.4 % Class I (glass, brick, stone), 70.2% Class II (burnished/rockface block) and 22.4% Class IV (painted block). Summary The finish standards are not met in either instance; however, the proposal introduces a third Class I material and a Class II material and the Class IV material is reduced by approximately 69%. 09/18/2008 12:05 FAX 6514523362 Mk'(; YxUYCKIItb W, v. ep 19 06 11:52a martin F. colon 651-653-4389 P.1 rv•rv con v.~Lxvi.~ouc mIV rx~rC.t(1 Less ICO02 a ~ i PHOri3E E85 1 45'~.3`~2 `~~}j~ r` j7 Fox: [BS"I ] ~2-3~BE' www mf=pr-oper,0wo. corn PROPEP'T ES CORPORATION September 18, 2006 Mr. Mike Ridley Project Planner I Community Development Department City of Eagan 8830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan MN 55122 Se: Pla2med Developsumt Amendment- Superior Auto Center 8425 Waslirgtou Drive l;agan, MN Dear Mr. Ridley. This letter shall register my strong opposition to the proposed PD Amendment and proposed use as an automobile collision center. I arse one of the original developera and owners of the Bicenbemn~i and Yankee Square Additions PUD in the mid 1974'a and early PA's. I am sUR the owner of Yankee Square Shopping Center, the adjacent properw to the north and three offioe buildings to the south. When the PUD was first put in place, we, u'orlmd closely with the City to provide a pleasant euviroament of eompatible uses like retail, restaurant, hotel, offices, and Light minor automobile services. I believe the proposed type of Auto Sody anoi Collin inn Repair is considered a =sjor repair use. per code and would not be a consistent use for the PD Amendment and the current CSC coning gv ideli nes. A bodp ebop servicing wrecked, immobile vehicles is not its the corxtemt of the original PVD and belongs in an indusftW area. The were fact that tbb facility requires an 8' tall privacy fence further &=onstmtes its incompatibility with our development. I wvulcl be in support of an eapansioa of this facility were it &Z a compatible light, minor auto services use. Currently, I have allowed the Amoco Certicaare to utilize several of the employee and overflow parldug apices at the rear of Yankee Square Shopping Center for vehicles requiring minor repairs. In exchange, Amoco has allowed. overflow parking for the shopping center during peak periods at the vacant west end of their lot, and a common snow removal contractor removes and piles snow £eam bath the Yankee Square Shopping Centex axed Amoco on the eouth property line. The Sgperior Collision. Canter plan is severely short of parking Eos its sews o cetstomors. PjaGPCF~`r gyKxpppr.oA pEvE~vi.ncvr agpagaev hAan~,48a.Wr.rr BRO~ri2 VaiNKSE SOUPRF_ OFFICE fl • 3470 1A/~agWlVGTpN DF1N6 ► SLUl'E -102 & EAC A Pj. MN 551 !Ra Za3 ..v r - . •aa_a vv izvrvvvr auav aa.v•ua.a ruv .kEJ VVJ ~p 18yUS 11:52a martin f. colon 651-853-438B p.2 v~...r....vc, mr~. rAHILAllnO IQ UVZ City of Eagan IAttzr Page 2 Parthermore, the a"ttison is so ]sxge that zw additional overflow parking wovild be available, and it makes no provisions for snow removal or storms. Should you allow an expanaian of this size, we would require the use of all of the parking bebind Yankee Square Shopping Center for employees, overflow parldng and snow etorage. The fact that the City is regWxi=g the relocation, of this business from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment District is proof enovgh that this use would degrade our development. Otberwise, the City would have =ado provisions for them to stay iii the area. A Collision Repair Center is considered a Major Repair use under the current zoning an4 is not consistent with our current PD. It belongs in an industrial aces. I st7rouglp oppose this use abd request that you deny this use in this area. Sincerely, AU Properties Corporation Martin F. Colon President WOM FOLDER9WARTW R. OOLLW~~1xroE£+t~aA~ldiyla @aA~er Aum Ctl.dw