The URL can be used to link to this page

07/11/1991 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission NOTICE.... SPECIAL EVENT COMMITTEE WILL MEET FROM 5:45 - 6:30 P.M. JULY 11, 1991 MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 1991 RE: COMMISSION MEETING - THURSDAY, JULY 1 1991 TOUR 6:30 - MEETING 7:30 P.M. There will be a tour of Wescott Station Park, Bur Oaks South Park and O'Leary Park; this is scheduled to begin at 6:30 P.M., leaving from the Eagan Municipal Center. We will return at 7:30 P.M. for our regular meeting. This month's Agenda appears to be a relatively light agenda, with few business items. OLD BUSINESS Under "Old Business" the Advisory Commission will discuss the planning arrangements being made for the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra. Members are aware, that the City Council approved the Advisory Commission's request to host this event, and staff will formalize the event. However, it will be important for the Advisory Commission to support this effort in order to assure its success. The second item under "Old Business" pertains to the Highline Trail grading. Director of Parks and Recreation sent a letter to Mr. Brad Swenson, who is now representing Tri-Land Properties again, pertaining to this particular item. I had asked Mr. Swenson to present in writing his proposal so that the proposal could be evaluated prior to its presentation. Mr. Swenson has not met the Agenda deadline for this, so unfortunately this item will have to be continued once again. NEW BUSINESS/PARK DEVELOPMENT Staff does not have any items pertaining to "New Business" or Parks Development. WATER QUALITY Staff has a few comments pertaining to activities concerning water quality within the City. I. COMMISSION MEETING JULY 9, 1991 PAGE TWO OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS There are numerous items under "Business and Reports" for the Advisory Commission's consideration: 1) The first is the "Departmental Happenings"; this is attached as part of your packet. 2) The second item it to set a meeting date for the long range planning meeting. The group met previously, and it would be appropriate for a second meeting in late July or early August. 3) The third item is the preparation underway for the Ohmann Park Grand Opening. 4) The fourth item concerns the budget process that staff is now involved in. 5) Item #5 is an update on the recreational facilities task force, which has recently received some significant attention in regards to a possible referendum for a recreational facility. 6) The sixth item is the Caponi Art Park. 7) Concerns the Northview Athletic Park repair for the fire damaged facility. ROUND TABLE Any possible items to be heard, and adjournment by the Commission would be in order. If members of the Commission are unable to attend either the tour or the regular meeting, please notify the department staff. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks & Recreation KV/bls a( AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, July 11, 1991 6:30 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center A. 6:30 P.M. Tour - Wescott Station Park, Bur Oaks South Park, O'Leary Park B. 7:30 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 6, 1991 F. Consent Agenda G. Development Proposals H. Old Business (1) St. Paul Chamber Orchestra (2) Highline Trail Grading 1. New Business J. Parks Development K. Water Quality L. Other Business and Reports (1) Happenings (2) Set Meeting Date for Long Range Planning Meeting (3) Ohmann Park Grand Opening (4) Budget Process (5) Recreation Facilities Task Force Update (6) Caponi Art Park (7) Northview Athletic Park Building M. Round Table N. Visitors to be Heard 0. Adjournment 3. Subject to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA JUNE 6, 1991 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:35 P.M. on Thursday, June 6, 1991 with the following Commission Members present: Mike Vogel, Lee Markell, Dick Carroll, Ted Billy, Deborah Johnson, Jack Johnson, Shawn Hunter and John Griggs. Commission Member George Kubik was not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; Paula Nowariak, Recreation Supervisor; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Rich Brasch, Water Quality Coordinator; Julie Erickson, Intern; Benita Soller, Intern and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Shawn Hunter asked that items 1 1 and 2 (intern reports) be placed on the agenda immediately following the Consent Agenda. John Griggs moved, Ted Billy seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 2, 1991 Under 'Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 4, 1991', Paragraph 3, John Griggs asked that the sentence read, '....standard of 210. He...' and that Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 should read, '.....willing to be in the $6,500 range.' Jack Johnson moved, Ted Billy seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as amended. CONSENT AGENDA Ted Billy moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council regarding consent agenda items. A. Kings Wood 5th Addition. 1. Lot 1, Block 1 shall be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 are located within the Blackhawk Planned Development and have fulfilled their parks dedication. 3. All lots shall be subject to a cash trailway dedication. B. Burnsville Lumber Company 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. C. E -Z Stop of Eagan - Crown Coco Co Inc 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trailway dedication. 5. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 2 D. Town Centre 7011th Addition 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trailway dedication. E. Oak Cliff 6th Addition 1. The parcel is located within the Winkler Jackson Planned Development. The parks dedication has been fulfilled via a land dedication of Slater Acres Park. 2. The Planned Development required the developer to install trailway, therefore the application is responsible for a bituminous trail along County Road #32. F. Cellular One - Waiver of Plat 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. TEEN RESEARCH PAPER - JULIE ERICKSON, INTERN Dorothy Peterson introduced the Commission to Julie Erickson who is completing her studies at Mankato State. She had expressed an interest in researching teen programming in an attempt to learn what teens are looking for and to what degree Parks and Recreation can play a part in offering programs to this segment of Eagan's population. Dorothy continued that this information will provide a valuable resource to the department for future planning. Julie Erickson highlighted some of the focus points for her teen research paper which included Eagan's profile as a community, goals and objectives of the research project, various research of other teen programs across the US, social change concepts that are pertinent to the molding of a teen program, recommendations for a possible direction of a program and program ideas for Eagan Parks and Recreation staff. It was noted that the focus age group of this particular project is 13 to 15 years of age. In her research with other teen programmers there were several issues that came out. Spontaneity needs to be allowed to happen in order for the ever changing needs of teens to be met; Parks and Recreation departments need to allow for that spontaneity without fear of failure. Teens have needs that are not easy to define and that is o.k. Teen input should be the number one deciding factor in any event or program. Teens express the need to have mentors or role models to look to; teens want to be heard; teens are working through the social frustrations of becoming an adult. Teens have limited access to constructive activities. Teens enjoy their space; they create their own world when they get together. Most important, both teens and recreational programmers need to realize that there is a process to building an excellent teen enrichment program. Process takes, time, patience and energy. In an interview with Mike Warter, the owner of Pockets, he stated that he believed that if we cater to the needs of teens first that the money to run the businesses will come in. He also felt that teens are floating more so than in the past. Most kids really want a direction or a mentor. He continued that when you talk to "at risk" kids you need to be a non-threatening person; not a parent, or a cop, or a teacher. He has found that in talking to kids in this kind of environment they come around a lot more; not to change them just to help them think on their own. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6,1991 MEETING PAGE 3 Julie concluded her report with recommendations for Commission and staff to consider when preparing to program for teens. She noted that the key to a successful program is flexibility. With that in mind the recommendations included: Be creative; allow for spontaneity; use a facility that has positive and inviting aesthetic values; as a programmer, use the lingo of teens; realize that any program with teens is a program that will take time and patience; try new and unique ideas; gently let teens know that the programmer is in charge, yet not by use of intimidation tactics; let teens help with advertising; bring teens into a program by touching the lives of their family; capture the heart of a teen by helping them develop an identify, establish meaningful relationships and make life decisions. Understanding teen minds and allowing them to grow, allowing them to be immature, and accepting them for being immature these are the fundamentals of programming. Shawn Hunter thanked Julie for her extensive, informative report and commented on the insight this will provide staff as they look at teen programming. He also commented that it is unfortunate that the youth population is segregated by school districts. Jack Johnson commented that Julie's report provided a lot of issues that need to be explored for teen programming and the need to continue to be creative. PARK USAGE SURVEY - BENITA SOLLER, INTERN Dorothy Peterson introduced Benita Soller who is completing her degree at the University of Minnesota. The research project that Benita would be presenting to the Commission was a study to determine the community resident's awareness of currently provided neighborhood parks and programs. The survey was comprised of 5 new and 5 older neighborhood parks. Benita explained that one of the reasons for the survey was to determine the community's usage of the currently provided neighborhood parks, resources and programs. The neighborhood parks identified for this study included Rahn, Woodhaven, Lexington, Highview, Cedar Pond, Bridle Ridge, Kettle, Quarry, Ridge Cliff and Walnut Hill. Benita continued that this study can provide short term, as well as long range planning directives such as the need for playground equipment, etc. Some of the issues/comments from the survey respondents included: they liked the playgrounds and/or the location of the park; they liked the picnic areas; they like Cedar Pond Park because of the pond; they wanted restrooms opened on a regular basis during the day and evening hours; they wanted drinking fountains available; they felt there were not enough swings provided; they did not like pea gravel used in playground area and they did not like geese droppings at Cedar Pond Park. Other comments were that people felt the parks were well maintained; there were sufficient parks to meet resident needs and most were spending more time in the park system than 2 years ago. In summary, recommendations by park users included providing access to bathrooms/drinking fountains for all day use; provide more benches around playground area; provide more picnic tables to make picnicking more pleasant and convenient; provide municipal outdoor swimming pool for community use and provide more infant swings in playground areas. Shawn Hunter thanked Benita for her very informative report. He continued that this information is very timely considering the Commission is beginning their long range planning needs for city parks. In response to input from residents, Shawn asked why pea gravel was used in playground areas rather than another material. Steve Sullivan responded that the gravel was self cleaning and provided a safe, resilient surface, however on the negative side, pea gravel is easy for kids to throw. The cost is similar to that of sand. Shawn thanked Benita again for an excellent report. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 4 ST. PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA Dorothy Peterson reminded the Commission that a Community Special Event Committee had been established to study the feasibility of hosting the St.Paul Chamber Orchestra in a concert at Eagan High School this fall. It was the consensus of the Committee that this issue should be brought back to the Commission at this time for their recommendations. Dorothy continued that the background information was provided in the memo on pages 15-17 in the packet. The primary concerns that may cause hesitation to proceed on this project are mostly financial. John Griggs again reviewed the background of this issue, explaining how this opportunity had come about and the committee's comments and review to date. He continued that this issue needs to go to the Council by the end of June, if the Commission so recommends, in order to plan for a September 12, 1991 performance. John explained the role TicketMaster would play in the sale and distribution of tickets for this event outlining the fees involved if this option is approved. Dorothy Peterson interjected that if the Commission and Council approve this plan, the school district could be approached to see if one of their groups would like to do concessions for the event. John Griggs stated that Ticket Master normally charges a 3% fee plus 2.5% fee for credit card/phone orders however they have verbally waived the 2.5% fee. He also suggested that 20-25 complimentary tickets be set aside for dignitaries and that 10 seats not be sold to cover any potential problems that may arise. Deb Johnson asked how this event would be advertised. John responded that part of the $6500 fee to the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra included posters and flyers and the Chamber of Commerce has offered to help get the word out to the community. Dorothy also noted that TicketMaster has a monthly mailing that would incorporate this September event along with their other offerings. Shawn Hunter asked the amount of staff time that would be involved in pursuing this project to which Dorothy responded very little provided TicketMaster handles the ticket sales. After further discussion John Griggs moved that the following recommendations be made to the City Council: 1. The City formalize an agreement with School District 196 Community Education to secure the usage of the Eagan High School auditorium for September 12, 1991. 2. The City enter into a contract with the St.Paul Chamber Orchestra as outlined in a letter to John Griggs dated January 3, 1991 to take place at Eagan High School on September 12, 1991 at a cost of $6,500 or less. 3. The City enter into a contract with TicketMaster to handle ticket sales based on agreement terms, conditions and service fees for processing. 4. Specific details to be worked out once approval has been given to proceed. Ted Billy seconded the motion with all members voting in favor. John Griggs noted the importance of bringing this before the City Council in a timely fashion to allow enough time to plan for a September 12, 1991 event. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 5 UPDATE ON POND JP30.1 Rich Brasch brought the Commission's attention to the Supplemental Report on Pond JP-30.1 beginning on page 19 of the packet. He reminded the Commission that this issue was reviewed on May 2, 1991 and the Commission had requested a supplemental report to address three specific issues. Those issues are 1) Did the City incur any legal obligation to hold a normal level in Pond JP-30-1 at or near the natural level of the pond prior to its incorporation into the City's storm system? 2) What additional evidence is there to help identity the natural water level in the pond prior to its incorporation into the storm sewer? and 3) To what degree might the pond be affected by sedimentation. Regarding the legal obligation outlined in Issue 1, Rich Brasch asked the Commission to read the legal opinion provided from the City Attorney included in both the May and June packets. This opinion stated that: "....the City is required to maintain an appropriate water level in the pond with respect to the storm sewer ponding system. The water level should protect the integrity of the storm sewer pond and have appropriate free board to prevent damage to neighboring residences. Based on the reports provided, it appears that that has been the case. While the City may take into account aesthetic considerations for the neighboring residents, the City's primary responsibility is the health and safety of the City and the residents. Thus, the pond water level should stay as currently established, unless a higher level water is as safe. The facts provided do not indicate a higher level as safe. Any change in that position should be made only after approval of the City Council.' Regarding Issue #2, Rich explained that DNR Area Hydrologist Pat Lynch was asked to attempt to determine the natural ordinary high water level of the pond. This is the elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence on the landscape. The key vegetative form relied upon to estimate the natural ordinary high water elevation for the pond was a large oak tree at the pond's southwest corner. Based on the calculation method used to determine ordinary high water levels, the area hydrologist indicated a natural pond elevation of 876.67 feet. Relative to the sedimentation outlined in Issue #3, Rich explained that core samples were taken at several locations in the pond including the middle of the pond and around each of the two inlets. Interpretation of the cores by the DNR area hydrologist indicates that most sedimentation has occurred around the inlets with little evidence of excessive sedimentation existing in the middle of the pond. In conclusion, Rich stated that the technical information gathered seems to suggest a natural pond elevation of .6 - .8 feet higher than the normal water level of the pond after the storm sewer was installed. In addition, sedimentation does not seem to have played a major role in decreasing the depth of water except around the stormwater inlets. Mike Kennedy whose home is adjacent to this pond reiterated that Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan showed a planned normal water elevation of 878 feet verses the new level of 876 feet after the storm sewer installation. He contends that the pond was 4 feet deep with no vegetation when he first moved near the pond and is concerned that because of the change in the water level coupled with dry weather the pond would be non-existent. He asked that the Commission consider making a recommendation to at least clean out the areas around the inlets, perhaps dredging it out for a short distance immediately around the inlets. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 6 Jack Johnson asked if there would be access to the pond for dredging and if so, what would the cost be for doing this type of work. Rich responded that it was possible to access the area but it would be difficult. One option would be to wait until the pond dried up or have the work done in the winter with a back hoe. The estimated cost to do this work would be between $10,000 and $21,000 assuming the depth over half the pond was increased by 3 feet. Jack noted that dredging did not appear to be a realistic option. Rich reiterated that dredging was possible and if the Commission would be considering that option the issue of cost responsibility would need to be clarified. Deborah Johnson asked for clarification of the storm sewer installation and the impact on water level. Rich reiterated that the explanation for the discrepancy indicated an error in the Stormwater Management Plan calculation because the pond's normal water elevation was taken from a preliminary grading plan that was incorrect. It is the contention of the consultant that the normal water elevation of 876 shown on the as-builts should be the normal water level identified in the Plan for Pond JP-30.1. John Griggs asked if dredging of the pond were to occur is there an estimation of sedimentation impact over the next several years. Rich Brasch responded that since construction is nearing completion, once cattails are removed and if the depth of the pond were to be restored to 3-4 feet, the pond should be o.k. Ted Billy questioned the risk involved in dredging a pond. Rich responded that ponds of this type typically have an impermeable material that seals the bottom and if that seal is broken during the dredging the pond would no longer hold water as well. Shawn Hunter commented that he did not hear many alternatives open to the Commission. He continued that under normal conditions ponds do fill in whenever there is construction immediately surrounding the area. After reviewing the Attorney's opinion, Shawn indicated his concern for setting a precedent with this case. He felt dredging the pond was not economically feasible and suggested that the matter be closed and the petition process terminated. Lee Markell commented that he liked the natural look of the pond and this was just a part of a pond's natural cycle. He hesitates recommending doing anything further with this pond and did not think .6 feet increase in the water level would make a significant difference in the appearance of the pond. John Griggs suggested that the Commission consider other alternatives such as dredging the pond with the City assuming the costs, splitting the cost with the neighbors, having the neighbors pay 100% of the costs, or as a last resort, do nothing at all. John stated that if the neighbors are willing to re-claim this pond, perhaps the City should be willing to do something to help them. Deborah Johnson reiterated Shawn Hunter's concern for setting a precedent with this decision. Lee Markell commented that dredging should be the last option considered. Dick Carroll reminded the Commission that the free board of this pond is below the City's recommendations and should be a strong factor in reviewing this issue. After further discussion, Shawn Hunter moved, Ted Billy seconded the motion to terminate the petition process on Pond JP 30.1 and close the matter. All Commission members voted in favor of the motion with the exception of John Griggs who voted against. The motion was passed. Mike Vogel asked if the City had any regulations regarding neighbors doing work around the pond to help with the aesthetic value of the pond. Rich Brasch stated this was an unprotected pond, therefore there are no regulations to monitor this type of action. He continued that if the neighbors wanted to pursue some clean-up options he would be happy to meet with them to assist during that process. Mike Vogel commented that a low cost alternative that may be considered would be vegetation management. 10 . ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 7 OAK CUFF 6TH ADDITION - WATER QUALITY ISSUES Rich Brasch explained that this development is a proposed 7.88 acre commercial development on the southwest corner of Slaters Road and Cliff Road. This parcel discharges to Pond AP-1 0, a shallow 3 acre natural pond classified as a nutrient trap. A small lift station located at the southeast corner of this pond moves the water down drainage to a .5 acre sediment basin where it is discharged through the storm water system into a recreational classified pond in Slater Acres Park and eventually is discharged to the Minnesota River. This development is currently in the preliminary plat approval process and must satisfy the City's water quality dedication requirements as a prerequisite to plat approval. Rich continued that the City may, at it's own discretion, require the construction of one or more ponds even when such ponds do not meet the 70% phosphorous removal efficiency criteria. The City shall require such ponds when it is determined that they are necessary to maintain the integrity of water quality in downstream recreational classified water bodies. In this case, the developer shall also be responsible for cash dedication equal to the full cost of equivalent land and pond volume needed to reduce phosphorus export to undeveloped conditions. The development planned at this site includes a gas station, restaurants, retail and car wash. Rich stated that initially Mr. Colon did not want to do ponding on the site nor did he want to be responsible for a cash dedication for water quality. It was noted that the City may vary from the provisions of the plan where the literal interpretation of the policies would result in a substantial inequitable hardship to the developer. Economic conditions alone shall not constitute a hardship if a reasonable use for the property remains. Even if hardship is determined, a cash dedication equal to the cost of land and pond volume needed for treatment of the remaining phosphorus load would be required. Mr. Colon met with Rich prior to this issue being reviewed by the Commission and stated he now agrees to providing on-site ponding. Rich stated that it is essential to have sufficient lead time in working with developers on proposed developments. He is suggesting that he meet with developers on water quality issues 2-4 weeks before the preliminary plat process to provide sufficient time for developers to respond to these issues. Shawn Hunter commented that it seemed less efficient to request dedication dollars than to require building on-site ponding. John Griggs asked if a developer could phase in the construction of on-site ponding. Rich responded that that scenario would address after construction run-off and would become a reactive option rather than proactive one. After further discussion, John Griggs moved, Lee Markel[ seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend on-site ponding for Oak Cliff 6th Addition which is to include a skimmer. WATER QUALITY - GENERAL UPDATE Rich stated that Jim Storland had been hired as a part time seasonal to help with the some of the testing procedures that will need to be completed over the summer. Jim will be working approximately 25-30 hours and joins the department with a very extensive background in this field. Construction of Pond JP-67, a 2-cell nutrient pond is nearing completion at Duckwood and Denmark. This pond has been constructed to handle the run-off of the 25 acre commercial site nearby. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6,1991 MEETING PAGE 8 Mike Vogel commented on the safety issue of having this pond left open with a projected depth of 10 feet. Rich responded that a vegetative fence would be installed around the pond. He also commented that the estimate for completing this project was $110,000 and the bid came in at $52,000. Jack Johnson commented on how good the pond looks. In conclusion, Rich noted that the water quality survey had been mailed with 67% having been returned. He noted that the University of Minnesota is donating $4500 in services to analyze the data which will be provided to the Commission upon completion. Rich added that a joint school/education program is being prepared for next year and preparation will begin shortly for the education information that will be provided to the public. HAPPENINGS Dorothy Peterson explained that there were no injuries during the lightning strike at Northview Athletic, however, there was extensive damage to the concession building. She noted that the field lights are back on line allowing evening games to continue and limited concessions will be operating out of the west building shortly. John VonDeLinde continued that there was approximately $15-20,000 in electrical damage alone and the total damage is approximated at $40-50,000. Dorothy commented on the article in the Chronicle noting the numbers of registrations the summer programs have generated this year. At this time there are over 3,000 registrations with the department averaging and additional 100 registrations a day. PARK CUFF NEIGHBORHOOD Ken Vraa brought the Commission's attention to a letter received from the Park Cliff neighborhood requesting a trail link from their neighborhood to Ohmann Park. Ken reminded the Commission that this issue had been addressed some time ago and has been put on hold since the proposed trail link would go through a part of Dakota County Park and they have not viewed this as a priority within their system at this point in time. This is an issue the City cannot address until it is known what the County will do. Whatever the timing may be, the trail link will need to go around the golf course which is all within Dakota County Park property. DOROTHY LEMAY LETTER Ken talked to the Commission regarding the letter from Dorothy LeMay requesting the development of Moonshine Park. He noted that this park is still in a natural state and development has always been planned to occur upon the development of adjacent property. The only other option would be to acquire additional land to develop this park; it is not known if the City is in a position to acquire additional land for this purpose. Ken suggested that the Commission look at this issue next month. COMPLAINTS REGARDING NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS Ken stated he has received complaints from residents relative to Ridge Cliff, Bridle Ridge and Oak Chase parks. Their concerns are relative to the use of these park's athletic facilities and the numbers of people those activities attract. They feel the parking and scheduled use of these parks exceed what the intention of a neighborhood park should be. Ken wanted the Commission aware that these residents' concerns have been expressed to staff. Dick Carroll suggested placing an article in the paper urging safe and slow driving around these neighborhood parks to help eliminate some of their concerns. /02• ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1991 MEETING PAGE 9 HIGHLINE TRAIL GRADING UPDATE Ken Vraa explained that this grading issue has become more of an engineering issue. He continued that the developer will be coming back with another option showing grading within the Highline Corridor and in the park. Shawn Hunter explained that the Commission wants to see this issue come back to them before any authorization is given to proceed with the project. ROUND TABLE John Griggs noted that the water quality issue of Pond JP30.1 seems to have come to a reasonable conclusion, however he had hoped that the Commission would have provided more of a leadership role in reclaiming water bodies. Shawn Hunter stated he felt the message sent was that generally speaking the City is not going to dredge, however, neighbors have other options they can follow through with. John VonDeLinde added that there will be limited dollars for capital improvements and it is important that the Commission carefully consider how they will expend those dollars. It would be important to note that priority water bodies have been identified and must be addressed first in regard to water quality issues. Dick Carroll expressed his concern in setting a precedent with this issue since 99% of the people living around ponds would then expect to have the water quality of their pond improved in the same manner. Dick noted the importance of focusing on the big picture of water quality within the City of Eagan. John Griggs reiterated that he would like to see this come back on a future agenda to be discussed further. Mr. Griggs expressed his concern for landscaping at the Northview tennis courts asking if there would be additional landscaping on the site. Steve Sullivan responded that the landscaping plan for that facility is planned to be completed within the year. With no further business to conduct, Mike Vogel moved, John Griggs seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.M. Secretary Date /3. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: JULY 1, 1991 RE: ST. PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA PERFORMANCE Background At its June 6, 1991 meeting, the Commission forwarded the following recommendation to the City Council: 1. The City formalize an agreement with School District 196 Community Education to secure the usage of the Eagan High School auditorium for September 12, 1991. 2. The City enter into a contract with the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra as outlined in a letter to John Griggs dated January 3, 1991 to take place at Eagan High School on September 12, 1991 at a cost of $6,500 or less. 3. The City enter into a contract with Ticketmaster to handle ticket sales based on agreement terms, conditions and service fees for processing. 4. Specific details to be worked out once approval has been given to proceed. In action taken at the June 18, 1991 City Council meeting, the Commission's recommendation was unanimously accepted. Of concern to the Council was the financial risk of this event. The Council asserted the importance of marketing the event and sales of tickets. Tasks Already Completed Staff has officially reserved the theater at Eagan High School for the evening of September 12, 1991. Robert Croce, Operations Manager for the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra, has been contacted. The official contract is being mailed to the City. Mr. Croce will provide the City with samples of program brochures. /,5. St. Paul Chamber Orcheestra Performance July 1, 1991 Page 2 Staff will meet with Nancy Carstens, Marketing Director for Ticketmaster, on July 8, 1991. She will provide an updated contract, which specifically states that the City will not be charged an additional 2.1% for telephone or credit card orders and that the price for printing complimentary tickets is 8v. Ms. Carstens will also provide the planning sheets which will assist with ticket pricing. The Special Events Committee will proceed in identifying all tasks, a timeline for completion and the division of labor. High on the list of tasks will be the marketing of the event and a potential sponsors list. Marketing and ticket sales are of primary importance and this work effort should begin immediately. DP/nh /b. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS JUNE 1991 1. The sand volleyball league has begun play at Rahn Athletic Courts. As anticipated, the addition of this sport to baseball and softball has placed tremendous pressure on parking at that complex. Among the alternatives that have been suggested to the sand volleyball contingent are car pooling and parking in the Rahn Elementary School lot. Staff continues to monitor the situation. 2. The Eagan Stagedoor Performers will conduct a lip sync contest at the 4th of July Celebration. The group had hoped to attract numbers of participants to engage in additional activities during the celebration, however, the "help" did not materialize. In recognition of the Lion's Club support, ESP will provide a "presence" through the lip sync contest. 3. The Carnival for the July 4th Celebration arrived at Rahn Park on Tuesday, June 25. The week of July 1 has been reserved for the Celebration at Rahn Park. EAA baseball and softball activities could not be arbitrarily canceled for an additional week. Through the cooperation of the 4th of July Committee and assistance from the Eagan Police Department staff was successful in delaying the carnival set up to more nearly meet the parameters of their permit to use the park and to enable EAA's activities to be held. 4. The concession operation at Northview Athletic is slowly picking up. A banner, provided by Coca Cola, has helped; and the return to selling hot dogs has been well received. Additionally, staff go to the circle of 4 fields to "solicit" business. 5. Six or eight Eagan seniors will again participate in the July 4th parade. A tractor rather than horses was requested so that the group didn't have to be at the back of the parade! 6. It is hoped that a survey can be conducted at the playgrounds this summer. The instrument is in a first draft stage. 7. To date 4,596 registrations have been handled for summer recreation activities. This compares with 3,500 for the Summer of 1990. 8. Youth tennis lessons continue to do well. Pilot Knob Park is the weakest site. Classes have ducked in and around rainy Fridays. Staff is monitoring the young teaching staff. 9. Fifty youth are participating in the Junior Team Tennis League. Four teams were formed. The enthusiasm is tremendous. All South of the River communities are represented, plus Prior Lake. The majority of the teens are Eagan youth. (29) 10. Golf lessons are weak this year. Troon Golf Learning Center is a marvelous facility, however, Savage is at a distance. 11. Evening in the Park events have begun. The Teddy Bear Band will draw a large crowd on July 10. Food shelf donations will be accepted on that date. The Chang-mi Korean dancers will perform on July 17. Representatives from the International Special Olympics Committee will be present to draw attention to the Special Olympics and to Eagan's sponsorship of Korea. 12. Trapp Farm's pavilion has a reservation for every Friday, Saturday and Sunday in July. Thomas Lake Park's pavilion has two (2) Sunday openings in July, all Saturdays are booked. The 4th of July week-end, as experienced in the past, is not a popular pavilion reservation time. 13. Fifteen (15) of twenty-two participants enjoyed the first ever in-line roller skating races held June 15 at Rahn Athletic. Five age groups competed in sprints, an obstacle course and a distance race. Everyone won a certificate, and ribbons were awarded for the top three finishers in each age group. 14. Thirty-five (35) teams entered the League Tournaments held June 22 and 23. Valley Lounge - Palmer won the Women's Division, Bloomington Plating won the Men's D Division and Pizza 'N' Pasta won the Men's C Division. Beautiful weather graced Northview Athletic all week-end. 15. Fifty (50) people enjoyed "Movies in the Park" Monday, June 17 at Trapp Farm Park. Two nature shows entertained families outdoors on the hill behind the shelter building. Next month will feature classic comedies on July 15. 16. Five teams are playing 3-on-3 basketball at Sky Hill Park on Monday evenings. Their season runs through August. 17. July and August will feature softball tournaments. July 13 and 14 is the Couples/Co- Rec League Tourney. July 27 and 28 we host the Women's Tournament of Champions for League winners in Eagan, Apple Valley and Rosemount. That same week-end we run play-offs for Women's D and Men's C teams in Eagan. August 3rd and 4th are the play-offs for our Men's D, Industrial C, Industrial D and Women's C teams. August 9-11 we host the 70 team-plus Men's Region IV Tourney. Finally, August 24 and 25 we are trying a new tourney admitting teams throughout the area who have a regular season record below .500. Al - 18. One hundred thirty (130) Eaganettes marched in the 4th of July Parade. The Eaganettes placed 2nd and received a $75.00 prize. 19. Summer in the Park is off to a great start. Many parks are "overflowing" with children. Bridle Ridge had 75 kids the very first day. Bag Lunch Day, Tye-dying T-shirts, Water Colors, Bubbles Day, Jump the Brook Bike Day, Water Days are some of the activities keeping the Summer in the Park kids busy. 20. The T-ball kids began their games on Monday, July 8. After 3 weeks of learning and practicing the techniques needed to play the game, the 6 & 7 year olds were anxious to play a "real" game. 21. Eight new park benches were installed at Northview Athletic, Heine Pond and Ohmann Parks. Also, installed were four waste containers at the sites. 22. A new playground installation at Ohmann Park during the month of June. A playground was installed by park maintenance workers Don Buecksler, Paul Graham and Alex Lammers. Assistance was also provided through the Twin Cities Tree Trust, who are working with the City again this summer. Their work involved installation of a timber perimeter wall and drain tile system. The tree trust participants also constructed a new planter box on the front south side of the Ohmann Park shelter building, and assisted with other miscellaneous park tasks, such as tree trimming and mulching. 23. Work also began on construction of a new tot-lot/playground at Carlson Lake Park. As the Commission will recall, this playground is located in the southwest corner of the park adjacent to the lineal trail system. It is expected that this trail project will be completed by the third week in July. 24. In June, the Department began a series of projects involving the installation of concrete pads under the bleacher sections of the City's athletic sites. The first site to receive new pads was the minor league field at Goat Hill Park. If the pads prove to be successful at Goat Hill Park, in allowing for easier litter pick-up and mowing, the project will then be expanded to Northview Park (fields #1 through #8) and Rahn Park (fields #1 through #4). The Dakota County Summer Restitution Program assisted the City with two projects during the month of June. These were the spreading of fifty (50) yards of wood chips under the O'Leary Park playground and thirty (30) yards of pea rock under the High View Playground, and the staining of the High View playground perimeter. 25. In the area of turf management, broadleaf weed spraying was completed on select sites in early June. The mowing of parks and boulevards also continued in full force throughout the month. The new Toro 580-D high capacity mower is proving to be extremely productive and versatile in the City's mowing program. Park Maintenance worker Scott Eppen, who is operating the machine, indicates that he is able to complete nearly thirty (30) parks comprising approximately 200 acres per week. 26. Preparations got under way in late June for the upcoming seal coating work on boulevard trails and parking lots. This will be another cooperative venture between the park and street departments again this summer, with equal sharing of manpower in the crack sealing and patching operations. 27. Routine maintenance also continued on a steady basis throughout the month of June. This included weekly trash pick-up, bi-weekly tennis court inspections, monthly playground inspections and daily dragging and striping of 53 infields. 28. Preparations were finalized on the Ohmann Park irrigation system in late June. A considerable amount of "fine tuning" was necessary in order to get the system running in this its first year of operation. This work included installation of the pump, full monitor and controller, checking and replacement of any damaged underground wiring valves, pipe and system testing and programming. Efforts are also being made to regain use of the system at Northview Park. As a result of the electrical fire, use of the controller and pump has been temporarily lost. The systems at Rahn and Goat Hill continue to run on schedule. 29. Two restitutions workers were retained in the month of June to assist with staining projects in the parks. One of these volunteer referrals is staining all 66 park benches in the park system; the other is putting a finishing coat of stain on the EAA storage building at Northview Park. Along these same lines, the City has also made a proposal to the Dakota County Court Services Department for participation in their new adult sentencing service program. Under this program, the County will be providing a crew of eight to twelve adult workers and a crew leader to local units of government for undertaking local City improvement projects. A number of projects have been presented to this group and City staff are confident that some projects may be undertaken this Summer and Fall. From all accounts, it appears that this program will be running continuously year around for the next three to four years. 30. The Forestry Department undertook a number of projects during the month of June. Among these were completion of landscape installations at Slater Acres and Carlson Lake Parks, shrub bed mulching in various parks, removal of dead trees and stumps, tree replacement and irrigation. The Forestry Department also worked with the Eagan/Burnsville branch of Lutheran Brotherhood on the installation of a new foundation planting at Northview Athletic Fields. This planter bed sits just south of the EAA park shelter building on the west side of the athletic complex. The Lutheran Brotherhood donated $400 and the labor to complete this project. A plaque will be erected next to the project to acknowledge their participation and generous contribution. Draft Response to Mike Kennedy Letter (for commission Approval) Mr. Mike Kennedy 3786 Greensboro Court Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Mike: Thanks for your letter of June 18. I can understand to some degree your frustration with the City's decision not to do more to address the petitioners concerns. However, there are several legitimate factors which played key roles in the commission's decision which I'd like to review now. In addition, I'd like to provide some comments of my own that I hope you'll consider. The Commission based it's decision on several factors. First, the present state of the pond is consistent with its classification as wildlife habitat in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Although fluctuations in rainfall will probably cause a change in the appearance of the pond from time to time, wildlife habitat still represents an appropriate use of the pond over the long term. Second, the evidence I was able to find indicated that the natural pond elevation prior to installation of the storm sewer system by the City was .6-.8 feet higher than after installation. The City tries to weigh safety, aesthetic, and cost considerations when constructing public improvements like the storm sewer which serves the Greensboro Addition. While aesthetics may be an important consideration, the Commission believes that the aesthetic impacts associated with a .6-.8 foot drop in normal water level of the pond do not outweigh the issues of safety and prevention of property damage by flooding. The final factor has to do with the technical options available to resolve the concerns raised in the petition. As we all know, increasing the elevation of the pond in an attempt to restore open water would increase unacceptably the flooding risk to at least one of the residences constructed near the southeast corner of the pond. It would also have increased maintenance costs for the storm sewer system. That left dredging as the only method I could identify to provide the pond depths needed to control emergent CV. plant growth. The Commission simply did not feel that the cost of dredging was reasonable and recognized there was a risk that such an action might have made matters worse by breaking the seal on the pond. In short, the projected costs were unreasonable and the risks of dredging were too great to be justified, especially given the designated use of the pond as wildlife habitat. Now for some opinions of my own that I hope you'll consider as part of an explanation for what's been happening with the pond. Like all hydrologic systems, the system with which we are dealing is a complex one which is continually changing. While there is good evidence that the pond once contained more water than it does now, there is also unmistakable evidence that the pond contained much less water over an extended period of time. The standing dead tree in the northwest corner of the pond attests to the later, a fact that was brought up during the Commission discussion. Residents need to accept the possibility that natural variations in precipitation could conceivably cause the water level in the pond to drop below the base of the dead tree again. I believe that the connection with upstream ponds and the expansion of the watershed will reduce the probability that this will happen, but it is still a possibility. Another factor important in explaining the current state of Pond JP-30.1 is the drought sequence that occurred in 1988 and 1989. As I explained during the commission meeting, the DNR apparently dealt with literally hundreds of situations similar to the one described for JP-30.1. Water levels in many of those ponds decreased substantially as a result of the drought, allowing emergent plants to spread to areas of ponds they could not formerly colonize because of inadequate light penetration caused by deeper water that existed prior to the drought. It's important to remember that JP-30.1 is part of a relatively small, shallow "perched water table" system which receives some groundwater recharge from whatever precipitation falls directly on, and infiltrates through, the overlying land. These systems are typically very susceptible to drought because they usually have little long-term water storage capability due to their relatively small aquifer volumes. Neither do they receive substantial lateral flow contributions from other parts of a larger ground water system. The conversion of the area from open, undeveloped to residential land use tends to exacerbate the susceptibility to drought somewhat by decreasing the amount of precipitation reaching the aquifer that likely discharges to Pond JP-30.1. This is because formerly permeable areas of the land are now covered by rooftops, driveways, and streets that are nearly impervious. The Commission recommendation regarding the petition for Pond JP- 30.1 will be forwarded to the City Council for approval or disapproval. I will attempt to include this item on the Council agenda for their second meeting in July. Please let me know if you're interested in making a presentation to the Council to air your views. I hope this provides the information you wanted, Mike. For your reference, I've included a draft of the minutes of the Commission discussion regarding the petition. Sincerely, Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator cc. Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission Ken Vraa Tom Colbert John Vondelinde g. 3786 Greensboro Court Eagan, MN 55123 June 18, 1991 Mr. Rich Brasch Water Resource Coordinator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Pond Improvement to JP-30.1 Dear Rich: This letter is commentary on the decision by the Parks and Recreation Commission to close the petition for pond JP-30.1. 1. The pond was completely open water when Greensboro (1st Addition) residents purchased their homes. 2. Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan indicates a normal water elevation of 878 feet. The storm sewer outlet was installed 2 feet below the normal level at 876 feet. 3. There has been excessive vegetative growth (e.g. cattails) since the storm sewer outlet was installed. 4. The pond water level is currently at its highest level due to above-average rainfall. Therefore, the Commission saying the pond looks good in its current condition is reasonable. However, if below average rainfall occurs and the pond dries up because the pond is 2 feet below the normal water level, then what is the commission's response? 5. The Commission does not want to set a precedent by improving pond JP-30.1. Does this mean the city has made similar errors in sewer systems and allowed homes to be built at elevations unsafe at normal pond elevations (i.e. taking away less costly and more feasible solutions)? I don't believe the commission is covering-up other city problems, rather they are using the "Pandora's Box" as a feeble excuse to not properly acknowledge the unique problem of pond JP-30.1. Rich Brasch Water Resource Coordinator June 18, 1991 Conclusion The efforts of Rich Brasch and his research have been commendable. However, the consultant's comments and the normal elevation estimate of 876.67 feet could easily be skewed to the city's objective to not take action. Will the residents be willing to take additional action to protect the long-term interests and value of their property? At this point, I'm not sure. But if the pond dries up, it may be a very important and potentially costly issue to deal with--legally or otherwise. The objective of our petition was to find a solution to pond JP-30.1 and remedy an error caused by the city that would avoid the potential for a beautiful pond to become a dried-up slough. We did not accomplish our objective. I am requesting that the City of Eagan provide a written response to this letter with comments on the decision to close the petition for pond JP-30.1. Sincerely, Michael Kennedy CC: Greensboro Petitioners Memorandum June 21, 1991 To: Rich Brasch From: Theresa Ahles RE: Environmental Quality Survey - Water Quality and Urban Forestry Enclosed are the preliminary results of the Water Quality and Urban Forestry survey. The analysis includes the frequency distribution of responses, as well as mean scores where appropriate. A word of explanation of the format used. For each question or part of question the total number of people responding is indicated along with the distribution of those responses. For example in Q3 below 224 or 97% of all respondents answered this question. Of those responding, 6%indicated they have never visit the parks in Eagan. I offer this explanation as a way to help you understand all what all these numbers mean. Q3. Frequency of visits to parks in Eagan Number Percent 1= Never 14 6.3 % 2= 1-4 times per year 70 31.3 % 3= 5-9 times per year 49 21.9 % 4= 10- 15 times per year 22 9.8 % 5= More than 15 times per year 69 30.8 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 4 Response percent = 98.2 % As you look over the results, think about what other analysis might be beneficial. One suggestion would be to look at the difference, if any, between those who rent and those who are homeowners. If there are any questions or concerns about the survey results, feel free to call me at 624-2221. City of Eagan Environmental Quality Survey Water Quality and Urban Forestry Preliminary Results Prepared by Theresa Ahles June 21, 1991 A. Water Quality Qi. Lakes, ponds, wetlands visible visible from residence Number Percent 1 = No 143 62.2 % 2 = Yes 87 37.8 % Total 230 100.0 % Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q2. Importance of wetlands, ponds, lakes to the enjoyment of residence Number Percent 1 = Not at all important 5 5.8 % 2 = Of little importance 14 16.3 % 3 = Moderately important 31 36.0 % 4 = Very important 36 41.9 % Total 86 100.0 % Mean = 3.1 Missing cases = 144 Response percent = 37.4 % Q3. Frequency, of visits to parks in Eagan Number Percent 1 = Never 14 6.3 % 2 = 1-4 times per year 70 31.3 % 3 = 5-9 times per year 49 21.9 % 4 = 10-15 times per year 22 9.8 % 5 = More than 15 times per year 69 30.8 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q4. Overall quality of lakes and ponds in Eagan Number Percent 1 = Poor 12 5.5 % 2 = Fair 93 42.3 % 3 = Good 107 48.6 % 4 = Excellent 8 3.6 % Total 220 100.0 % Mean = 2.5 Missing cases = 10 Response percent = 95.7 % 1 Q5. Importance of good water quality in Eagan's lakes and ponds Number Percent 2 = Of little importance 6 2.6 % 3 = Moderately important 79 34.6 % 4 = Very important 143 62.7 % Total 228 100.0 % Mean = 3.6 Missing cases = 2 Response percent = 99.1 % Q6a. Importance of Storm Water Drainage and Flooding Number Percent I = None 1 0.4 % 2 = Low 22 9.6 % 3 = Moderate 92 40.0 % 4 = High 115 50.0 % Total 230 100.0 % Mean = 3.4 Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q6b. Importance of Excessive Algae and Weed growth in lakes Number Percent 1 = None 1 0.4 % 2 = Low 14 6.1 % 3 = Moderate 74 32.2 % 4 = High 141 61.3 % Total 230 100.0 % Mean = 3.5 Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % 2 Q6c. Importance of the Lack of Fishing Opportunities Number Percent 1 = None 31 13.5 % 2 = Low 91 39.6 % 3 = Moderate 67 29.1 % 4 = High 41 17.8 % Total 230 100.0 % Mean = 2.5 Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q6d. Importance of the Lack of Swimming Opportunities Number Percent 1 = None 14 6.1 % 2 = Low 53 23.1 % 3 = Moderate 90 39.3 % 4 = High 72 31.4 % Total 229 100.0 % Mean = 2.9 Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q6e. Importance of Shoreline Preservation and Restoration Number Percent 1 = None 4 1.7 % 2 = Low 21 9.1 % 3 = Moderately 96 41.7 % 4 = High 109 47.4 % Total 230 100.0 % Mean = 3.3 Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % 3 Q6f. Importance - Other water issues Number Percent Erosion of banks, filling of ponds - for development 1 33.3 % Increase number of public beaches 1 33.3 % Unplanned growth 1 33.3 % Total 3 100.0 % Missing cases = 227 Response percent = 1.3 % Q7. Aware of Eagan's management plan -----to-improve water quality Number Percent 1 = No 141 61.3 % 2 = Yes 89 38.7 % Total 230 100.0 % Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q8. Interested in receiving information on actions you-can take to improve water quality Number Percent 1 = Not at all interested 6 2.6 % 2 = Weak 47 20.6 % 3 = Moderately strong 120 52.6 % 4 = Very strong 55 24.1 % Total 228 100.0 % Mean = 3.0 Missing cases = 2 Response percent = 99.1 % 4 B. Yard Care Q9. Frequency lawn fertilized Number Percent I = Never 12 5.4 % 2 = Once a year 26 11.6 % 3 = Twice a year 74 33.0 % 4 = Three times a year 69 30.8 % 5 = Four of more times a year 43 19.2 % Total 224 100.0 % Mean = 3.5 Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q10. Frequency hire commercial lawn fertilizing company Number Percent 1 = Never 155 69.8 % 2 = Once a year 4 1.8 % 3 = Twice a year 8 3.6 % 4 = Three times a year 27 12.2 % 5 = Four or more times a year 28 12.6 % Total 222 100.0 % Mean = 2.0 Missing cases = 8 Response percent = 96.5 % Qil. Purchase own fertilizer from store in Eagan Number Percent 1 = No 58 32.0 % 2 = Yes 118 65.2 % 9 = Can't remember 5 2.8 % Total 181 100.0 % Missing cases = 49 Response percent = 78.7 % Q12. Fertilizer used contains 3% Phosphorus or less Number Percent 1 = No 19 8.8 % 2 = Yes 63 29.3 % 9 = Don't know 133 61.9 % Total 215 100.0 % Missing cases = 15 Response percent = 93.5 % 5 Q13. Soil Tested Number Percent 1 = No 199 89.2 % 2 = Yes 24 10.8 % Total 223 100.0 % Missing cases = 7 Response percent = 97.0 % Q14. Lawn clippings kept off driveways, streets and gutters Number Percent 1 = Never 8 3.6 % 2 = Rarely 11 4.9 % 3 = Sometimes 60 26.8 % 4 = Always 145 64.7 % Total 224 100.0 % Mean = 3.5 Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q15. Frequency of leaf and other plant removal from street gutters Number Percent 1 = Never 46 20.8 % 2 = Rarely 37 16.7 % 3 = Sometimes 79 35.7 % 4 = Always 59 26.7 % Total 221 100.0 % Mean = 2.7 Missing cases = 9 Response percent = 96.1 % 6 Q16. Location of compost area a. Least used part of yard Number Percent 1 = No 31 42.5 % 2 = Yes 42 57.5 % Total 73, 100.0 % Missing cases = 157 Response percent = 31.7 % b. Close to garden/area where compost used Number Percent 1 = No 49 67.1 % 2 = Yes 24 32.9 % Total 73 100.0 % Missing cases = 157 Response percent = 31.7 % c. Within 50 ft of pond, lake or werland Number Percent 1 = No 69 94.5 % 2 = Yes 4 5.5 % Total 73 100.0 % Missing cases = 157 Response percent = 31.7 % d. In a swale or gully Number Percent ---66- 1 No 90.4 % 2 = Yes 7 9.6 % Total 73 100.0 % Missing cases = 157 Response percent = 31.7 % e. Other compost sites Number Percent 2 = Yes* 1 -14 3 % 6 85.7 % Total 7 100.0 % Missing cases = 223 Response percent = 3.0 % * Respondents listed the following locations: in vegetable garden, in neighbor's yard, along tree line, in the woods, and open forest area. 7 C. Other Home Activities Q17. Disposal of household chemicals in wrong place a problem in neighborhood Number Percent 1 = No 151 65.9 % 2 = Yes* 21 9.2 % 9 = Don't know 57 24.9 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % * One respondent indicated that empty lots were used as disposal area for household chemicals. Q18. Frequency wash car in driveway or street Number Percent 1 = Never 43 18.8 % 2 = 1-4 times a year 96 41.9 % 3 = 5-9 times a year 45 19.7 % 4 = More than 10 times a year 45 19.7 % Total 229 100.0 % Mean = 2.4 Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % D. Urban Forestry Q19..Favor planting boulevard trees Number Percent 1 = No 20 8.8 % 2 = Yes 205 90.7 % 3 = Yes and No* 1 0.4 % Total 226 100.0 % Missing cases = 4 Response percent = 98.3 % * One respondent favored tree planting only on certain streets. 8 Reasons why some Eagan homewners fail to plant trees or shrubs on their property... Q20a. Lack money to purchase plant materials Number Percent 1 No 96 41.9 % 2 = Yes 133 58.1 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q20b. High cost of trees Number Percent: 1 = No 94 41.0 % 2 = Yes 135 59.0 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q20c. Lack lanscaping plan Number Percent. 1 = No 160 69.9 % 2 = Yes 69 30.1 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q20d. Uncertain about what to plant Number Percent 1 = No 146 63.8 % 2 = Yes 83 36.2 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % 020e. Not worth investment Number Percent 1 = No 198 86.5 % 2 = Yes 31 13.5 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % 9 Q20f. Time commitment Number Percent 1 = No 159 69.4 % 2 = Yes 70 30.6 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q20g. Unaware of Economic and ecological value of trees and shrubs Number Percent 1 = No 140 61.1 % 2 = Yes 89 38.9 1s Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q20h. Not home long enough to enjoy Number Percent 1 = No 183 79.9 % 2 = Yes 46 20.1 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q21. Aware of ordinance for pruning Number Percent 1 = No 129 56.6 % 2 = Yes 99 43.4 % Total 228 100.0 % Missing cases = 2 Response percent = 99.1 % Pruning and removal of trees on property... Q22a. Self Number Percent = No 78- 1 34.1 % 2 = Yes 151 65.9 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % 10 Q22b. Hire non\licensed handyman Number Percent 2 = --NY-eo 224 97.8 % 5 2.2 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q22c. Hire licensed tree contractor - Number Percent 1 = No 208 90.8 % 2 = Yes 21 9.2 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q22d. Depend on as friend Number Percent 1 = No 211 92.1 % 2 = Yes 18 7.9 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % Q22e. Have never pruned or remover trees Number Percent 1 = No 178 77.7 % 2 = Yes 51 22.3 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % 11 Respondents requests for more information dealing with trees and landscaping... Q23a. More info on City forestry programs Number Percent 2 = No 150 72.8 % Yes 56 27.2 % Total 206 100.0 - Missing cases = 24 Response percent = 89.6 % Q23b. More info on Arbor month activities Number Percent 1 = No 175 85.4 % 2 = Yes 30 14.6 % Total 205 100.0 % Missing cases = 25 Response percent = 89.1 % Q 23c. More info on Proper planting methods Number Percent 1 = No 105 51.2 % 2 = Yes 100 48.8 % Total 205 100.0 % Missing cases = 25 Response percent = 89.1 % Q23d. More info on Pruning trees and shrubs Number Percent 1 = No 84 41.0 % 2 = Yes 121 59.0 % Total 205 100.0 % Missing cases = 25 Response percent = 89.1 % Q23e. More info on Treating tree diseases/pests Number Percent 1 = No 99- 48.3 % 2 = Yes 106 51.7 % Total 205 100.0 % Missing cases = 25 Response percent = 89.1 % 12 Q2 3f. More info on Avoiding construction damage Number Percent 1 = No 191 93.6 % 2 = Yes 13 6.4 % Total 204 100.0 % Missing cases = 26 Response percent = 88.7 % Q23g. More info on Landscaping for energy conservation Number Percent 1 = No 124 60.5-% 2 = Yes 81 39.5 % Total 205 100.0 % Missing cases = 25 Response percent = 89.1 % Q23h. More info on Landscaping for wildlife Number Percent 1 = No 121 59.9 % 2 = Yes 81 40.1 % Total 202 100.0 % Missing cases = 28 Response percent = 87.8 % Q23i. More info - OTHER topics Number Percent Proper watering schedule for trees = 2 28.6 % Wild gardens/flowers/gardens = 1 14.3 % Berm maintenance = 1 14.3 % Financial aid = 1 14.3 % Oak wilt = 1 14.3 % Landscaping banks instead of walls to prevent soil erosion = 1 14.3 % Total 7 100.0 % Missing cases = 223 Response percent = 3.0 % 13 E. Information Sources and Needs Q2 4a_-Sources-of info - "Eagan This Week" Number Percent 1 = No ---85 37.8 % 2 = Yes 140 62.2 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q26b. Sources of info - "The Chronicle" Number Percent 1 No 43.1 % 2 = Yes 128 56.9 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q24c_-Sources-of info - Local Cable TV Number Percent 1 No 215 95.6 % 2 = Yes 10 4.4 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q24d. Sources of info - Eagan City Newsletter Number Percent 1 No 122 54.2 % 2 = Yes 103 45.8 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q24e. Sources of info - Word of Mouth Number Percent 1 = No 190 84.4 % 2 = Yes 35 15.6 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % 14 Q24f. Sources of info - Brochures and Flyers Number Percent - 1 = No 176 78.2 % 2 = Yes 49 21.8 % Total 225 100.0 % - Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q24g. Sources of info - Public Meetings Number Percent 2 No -223 99.1 % Yes 2 0.9 % Total 225 100.0 % Missing cases = 5 Response percent = 97.8 % Q24h. Sources of info - Other Number Percent _ Bachman's = 1 20.0 % Pioneer Press = 2 40.0 % Star Tribune = 1 20.0 % U of MN, Ext. = 1 20.0 % Total 5 100.0 % Missing cases = 225 Response percent = 2.2 % Q25a. Brochures and Flyers most helpful Number Percent 1 = No 154 68.8 % 2 = Yes 70 31.3 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q25b. Local newspapers most helpful Number Percent I = No -96 42.9 % 2 = Yes 128 57.1 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % 15 Q25c. Public/Neighborhood meeting most helpful Number Percent 1 = No 218 97.3-% 2 = Yes 6 2.7 % Total 224 100.0-% Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q25d. Cable TV most helpful Number Percent 1 2 = --NY-eo -s 218 -9-7--.3 % 6 2.7 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q 25e. Workshops most helpful Number Percent 1 = No -220 98.2 % 2 = Yes 4 1.8 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q25f. City Newsletter most helpful Number Percent 1 2 = --NY-eo -s 112 -5-0--.0 % 112 50.0 % Total 224 100.0 % Missing cases = 6 Response percent = 97.4 % Q25g. Other Number Percent - Bachman's _ 1 33.3 % Friends = 1 33.3 % Star Trib = 1 33.3 % Total 3 100.0 % Missing cases = 227 Response percent = 1.3 % 16 Respondents requests for more information on the following: Q 26a. More info on Recycling Number Percent 1 = No 111 52.6 % 2 = Yes 100 47.4 % Total 211 100.0 % Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q26b_-More info on Waste Reduction Number Percent 2 = Yes------------- 122 57.8 % 2 = 88 41.7 % 1 0.5 % Total 211 100.0 % Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q26c. More info on Household Hazardous Waste Number Percent I = No 124 58.8 % 2 = Yes 87 41.2 % Total - 211 100.0 % Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q26d. More info on Monitoring Eagan's Lakes Number Percent 2 = Yes 55 156 73.9-% 55 26.1 % Total 211 100.0 % Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q26e. More info on Lake and Shoreline Management Number Percent 1 No 185 87.7 % 2 = Yes 26 12.3 % Total 211 100.0 $ Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % 17 Q26f. More info on Lawn Care and Composting Number Percent 1 No 95- 45.2 % 2 = Yes 115 54.8 % Total 210 100.0 % Missing cases = 20 Response percent = 91.3 % Q26g. More info on Urban Forestry Number Percent 1 = No 131 62.1 % 2 = Yes 80 37.9 % Total 211 100.0 $ Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q26h. More info on Energy Conservation Number Percent 1 2 = --NY-eo -s --134 63 5 % 77 36.5 % Total 211 100.0 % Missing cases = 19 Response percent = 91.7 % Q261. More info on Other Topics N umber Percent 2 = Yes* 2 -----2 100.0 ~ Total 2 100.0 % Missing cases = 228 Response percent = 0.9 % * This included: where to deposit drain oil and where to dispose of household hazardous waste close to home 18 F. General Information about Respondents Q27_-Length-of-residency in Eagan Number Percent Less than one year = 5 2.2 % One to Five years = 101 45.5 % Five to Ten years = 57 25.7 % Ten to Fifteen years = 26 11.7 % Fifteen to Twenty years = 14 6.3 % More than Twenty years = 19 8.6 % Total 222 100.0 % Mean = 8 years Range = 1 month to 36 years Missing cases = 8 Response percent = 96.5 % Q28. Type of Housing Number Percent 1 = Single family residence 216 93.9 % 2 = Duplex 4 1.7 % 3 = Townhome/Condominium 9 3.9 % 5 = Twin Home 1 0.4 % Total 230 100.0 % Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q29. Number of People in Household Number Percent 1 = ---13- --5.7 % 2 = 67 29.1 % 3 = 45 19.6 % 4 = 73 31.7 % 5 = 28 12.2 % 6 _ 3 1.3 % 9 1 0.4 % Total 230 100.0-% Mean = 3 Missing cases = 0 Response percent = 100.0 % Q30. Age of Respondent Number Percent _ 1 = Less than 30 years 26 11.4 % 2 = 30-39 Years 98 42.8 % 3 = 40-49 Years 62 27.1 % 4 = 50-59 Years 25 10.9 % 5 = 60-69 Years 15 6.6 % 6 = 70 Or Older 3 1.3 % Total 229 100.0 % Missing cases = 1 Response percent = 99.6 % 19