02/06/1992 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
JUST A REMINDER
THE RECREATION SUBCOMMITTEE WILL MEET
AT 6:00 P.M. PRIOR TO THE
BEGINNING OF THE COMMISSION MEETING
LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING YOU!
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1992
RE: FEBRUARY 6, ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
After the Call to Order and Pledge of Alliance, we will have an official introduction of the
new Commission members recently appointed by the City Council. Following the
introduction, there will be a thank you/presentation for former Commission Member
George Kubik, who was on the Commission for three successive terms for a total of nine
years.
Following the recognition of Mr. Kubik, approval of the agenda and the minutes of the
regular meeting of the Commission on January 9, 1992, is in order.
COMMISSION ORGANIZATION
The first formal agenda item is the Commission's Organization. Under this there are
several points reviewed regarding Commission members responsibilities. These items are
included in your packet. Staff will just briefly review the role of the Commission and the
members responsibility. Staff have prepared a memorandum entitled "organizational
business", which is included. This addresses the process for the election of the Chair, Vice-
Chair and Secretary, as well as committee appointments. During this process, the Director
of Parks & Recreation will act as a "temporary chair", to facilitate the distribution and
collection of the ballots.
CONSENT AGENDA
Of interest to new members of the Commission, the Commission has previously used the
consent agenda as a means of expediting certain items of routine nature. If members have
a question about the consent item, the item is pulled and then discussed. If there are no
questions, a motion to approve all consent items would be appropriate.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
There are three development proposals before the Advisory Commission at this time. The
first item is Weston Hills Addition, which has been an item the Commission has looked at
over the last two Commission meetings, as it relates to the needs for a park dedication
within that Park Service District. At this time, this addition is being proposed to the
Commission for a final recommendation regarding the dedication requirements (cash
dedication for both parks and trails) and recommendation to the City Council. As is always
the case, staff has prepared and provided you with memorandums concerning the three
development proposals.
OLD BUSINESS
There are two items under "Old Business" that staff has prepared separate memorandums
on. The first is a follow-up from the League Leadership meeting on adult softball, which
has proposed a compromise from the previous recommendation from the Commission. The
memo is self-explanatory.
The second item is the proposed tree ordinance update. Members who have served on the
Commission previously will recognize that this was an item that was requested by the
Commission at the December meeting. Information provided contains history and
background on the tree replacement ordinance and its status.
NEW BUSINESS
At this time, there are no items under "New Business".
PARK DEVELOPMENT
Staff has prepared for Commission review a listing of work projects identified for 1992. This
includes work priorities as they relate to the planning and development responsibilities of
the department. Many of these items are carry-over items from previous years and re-
prioritized to reflect what we believe to be the relative importance of these projects and the
time available to complete the work this year.
As always, we have included more projects than are likely to be completed, because it
reflects the need to address these development items as time and opportunity permits. The
Commission is asked to review this list and make its recommendations or additions.
WATER QUALITY
There are three items under "Water Quality" for review and update. Some of these items
will be covered by presentation.
OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
The first item under this agenda is the staff presentation on the summer program changes
as anticipated for the 1992 Summer In The Park (SIP) playground program. Again, staff
has prepared a memorandum for review. Staff would like your comments and concerns
regarding this, in order to provide these recommendations to the City Council and
implementation for this year.
The Department Happenings are again provided to the Commission Members as a way of
updating you on activities that have taken place over the last month.
The Director of Parks and Recreation would like to update the Commission on the
Swimming Pool/Ice Arena and its status.
ROUND TABLE/ADJOURNMENT
Following the Round Table discussion, it would be appropriate for the Commission to
adjourn.
If members of the Advisory Commission have any concerns or comments regarding this
agenda, or are unable to attend the meeting as scheduled, please contact the department
to let us know.
Respectfully submitted,
42
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation
KV/bls
3.
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Thursday, February 6, 1992
7:00 PM
Eagan Municipal Center
A. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center
B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
C. Introduction of New Members:
¦ David Mooradian
¦ Jonathan Widem
¦ Erin Ipsen
¦ Kevin Knight (alternate)
D. Appreciation Award:
¦ George Kubik
E. Approval of Agenda
F. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 9, 1992
G. Visitors to be Heard
H. Commission Organization:
(1) Review Commission Members Responsibilities
(2) Election of Chairperson
(3) Election of Vice Chair
(4) Election of Secretary
(5) Committee Appointments:
(a) Recreation Committee
(b) Development/Finance
(c) Park Naming
(6) Commission Meeting Dates and Times
1. Consent Agenda
(1) Town Centre 100 10th Addition - Rovick Realty
J. Development Proposals
(1) Weston Hills Addition - Lyman Development
(2) Wexford Addition - Dan Dolan Development
(3) Hawthorne Woods Addition - Lyman Development
K. Old Business
(1) Follow Up From League Leadership Meeting
(2) Proposed Tree Replacement Ordinance Update
L. New Business
M. Parks Development
(1) 1992 Development Projects
N. Water Quality
(1) Draft of Water Quality Brochure
(2) Stenciling Program for Storm Sewer Catch Basins
(3) Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991 - Update
0. Other Business and Reports
(1) Summer Program Changes
(2) Department Happenings
(3) Ice Arena/Swimming Pool Update
P. Round Table
0. Adjournment
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 9, 1992
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 9, 1992 with the following Commission Members present:
Deborah Johnson, Jack Johnson, Dick Carroll, George Kubik, and Ted Billy. Commission Members Shawn
Hunter and Lee Markel) were not present. Staff present Included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation;
Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John
VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary.
AGENDA
Ted Billy moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda
as presented.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 1991
Page 3, Paragraph 1, Item #2 should read, "....continue. The date of October 31, 1995 will be
designated as the last date of the phase out." Page 4, Paragraph 4, Sentence 2 should read, "....making
a decision on this issue."
Ted Billy moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes
as amended.
CONSENT AGENDA/DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
There were no consent agenda items and no development proposals for the Commission to review.
PARK SERVICE AREA 36E
Director Vraa re-Introduced this item to the Commission noting that the recommendation made on
December 5th by the Commission was that a park was needed in this park service area but Instructed staff
to evaluate potential park site acquisition areas within this PSA. As review, Mr. Vraa identified the area which
Is located south of Cliff Road, east of Highway 3, north of the City of Rosemount and west of the City of
Inver Grove Heights. He continued that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the entire area for
single family residential at 0-3 units per acre with an unpredictable development time frame.
The primary criteria used to review each study area Included, 1) Standard site analysis items such
as topography, drainage, vegetation, etc.; 2) Development efficiencies and constraints; 3) Service area
efficiencies and constraints; 4) Acquisition considerations and 5) Economic considerations.
In looking at a joint park concept with Inver Grove Heights (Study Site #1) it was noted that Inver
Grove Heights has yet to adopt their Comprehensive Parks System Plan but they felt that this site would not
fit the criteria they were establishing for this area of Inver Grove Heights. After further study it was
determined that Study Sites 2 and 3 were the most feasible option for the Commission to consider.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1992 MEETING
PAGE 2
Steve noted that Study Site 2 lies within the southwest comer of the proposed Weston Hills Addition
and comprises 18 acres. In describing the site, Steve noted that the pond edge is encircled with slopes
ranging from 4-20% and covered with overstory trees with mature oak trees ringing the northeast side of
the pond. The northwest edge of the pond contains a mixed tree mass of aspen, oaks, sugar maple and
willow. Steve continued that the plateau area of the site provided for minimal design flexibility. Acquisition
could be done via parks dedication of 6.3 acres within the Weston Hills Development or through purchase.
Steve noted that the developer prefers a cash dedication of approximately $94,000 In lieu of a land
dedication. The developer tentatively considered a land dedication subject to the City providing cash credit
towards the pond and adjacent steep slopes
Study Site 3 lies south of Farm Road, west of the Inver Grove Heights/Eagan border and north of
a 40 acre tree farm. Mr. Sullivan explained that the study area (approximately 22 acres) can effectively
support a 4-7 acre park site with low to moderate development costs and good design flexibility. He added
that there was no pond nor many trees that could be Incorporated as a resource for this park. It was noted
that acquisition would be possible via purchase from one or two land owners. It was noted that the
estimated acquisition costs could range from $48,000 to $91,000. In consideration of the limited parkland
opportunities within PSA 36E, the use of condemnation may be a viable acquisition methodology If the seller
contests the City's pursuit for an agreeable purchase.
In conclusion it was noted that Study Area 2 indicated that a 6.3 acre dedication could be made,
but that there would be a significant loss of vegetation and higher development cost in order to meet typical
parkland design and layout standards. Study Area 3 provides property that Is developmentally cost efficient
and provided design flexibility. The resource based opportunities are not available in Study Area 3, but
could be provided via the design process.
George Kubik expressed his concern for a park being located in such close proximity to train tracks
as shown in Study Area 2. Dick Carroll commented that with an athletic facility within the park use would
be generated from the west side across Hwy 3 and the train tracks. He too expressed a safety concern
noting that access would need to be internal from Hwy 3. Mr. Kubik also commented on the type of soils
in this study area. Mr. Carroll responded that it was primarily sand and gravel and could pose some
development problems.
Both Mr. Kubik and Mr. Carroll expressed their preference for Study Area 3 because it provides more
potential for development and has adequate space for development. Mr. Carroll added that the mix of
commercial and residential southwest of the study area needs to be considered when providing accessibility
to a park within PSA 36E.
After further discussion, Jack Johnson moved that a park is needed to serve residents within PSA
36E and recommended that Study Area 3 be designated as'the park site for PSA 36E. Deborah Johnson
seconded the motion with all members voting in favor.
COUNTY ROAD 30 - EAST OF DODD ROAD: TRAILS
Director Vraa introduced this item to the Commission noting that as Dakota County Is preparing
preliminary plans for the upgrading of Diffley Road from Blueberry to Highway 3 they are looking at options
regarding the steep side slopes and road grades through this section of road. The City's plans have
previously identified a bike trail along this section of roadway, however the County has inquired if, rather
than having off-road bike trails the City would consider providing that option only for the segment of road
east of Dodd to Highway 3.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1992 MEETING
PAGE 3
Mr. Vraa continued that Diffley will be upgraded to a five (5) lane road; two lanes each direction with
a fifth center lane for left hand turns. East of Dodd Road, however the County is proposing to construct a
road surface 52 feet wide providing a 12 foot wide lane In each direction, a 12 foot wide center lane and two
8 feet wide trails, one on each side of the road, but within the curb.
In reviewing traffic counts and the MnDOT design manual, staff looked at other options the county
could consider. One alternative was to have the trails off the road, as Is currently in place along the newly
completed portion of Co. Rd. 30 (Diffley). With that alternative it was noted that because of the steep slopes,
extensive grading, substantial loss of trees and expensive retaining walls would be required to facilitate off-
road trails.
Another alternative discussed would be to have a single trail on one side of the road through the
steep slope portion of Diffley Road. Staff's feeling is that this may not facilitate the needs of the area due
to the residential development on both sides of Diffley Road. It was envisioned that the on-road bikeways,
given the good trailway classification by the MnDOT Bikeway design manual, would perhaps be more
acceptable than having only one off-road trail.
Stephen Sullivan stated that there has also been some concern expressed regarding the widening
of County Road 30 near the Country Hollow development because of the steep slopes.
Ted Billy expressed his concern for the narrowing of County Road 30 from 5 lanes to 3 lanes east
of Dodd Road. He continued that an off-road trail would provide more safety and stressed the safety
concern of providing on-road trails In an area that narrows from 5 lanes to 3 lanes.
Unidentified resident from 580 Autumn Oaks Road expressed his displeasure with the widening of
County Road 30 beyond what is absolutely necessary. He stated that the impact to the homes in the
Country Hollow development would be substantial if the road is widened to the degree the County is
proposing. He continued that he would prefer that a trail be installed on the south side rather than on the
north side because of the steeper grades on the north side.
Dick Carroll asked if the County could widen the road only to the south with no expansion to the
north. Stephen Sullivan explained that the County was trying to widen Co. Rd. 30 evenly from the existing
middle point.
Jack Johnson asked about the planned trail location west of Dodd Road. Ken Vraa responded that
the area east of Lexington and west of Dodd did not pose a great deal of difficulty In allowing for an off-road
trail to be placed on both sides. The section of Diffley Road that becomes difficult to plan trails for is the
area from the Caponi property east to Lexington.
George Kubik reiterated the safety concern for on-road trails In this section of Co. Rd. 30. He stated
that an off-road trail on the south side would be more palatable. Ted Billy commented that If consideration
is given to an on-road trail on the north side and an off-road trail on the south side his concern is for the
area where traffic narrows from 5 lanes to 3 lanes at Dodd Road. Dick Carroll shared his concern about
drivers using an on-road trail as a traffic lane at the location where the lanes narrow.
Jack Johnson stated he did not think that providing only one trail would be sufficient. His
preference was to have an off-road trail on each side of Co. Rd. 30 and shift the road location to the south
to mitigate the problem of the steep slopes. Dick Carroll commented that it may be prohibitive for the
County to consider providing an 8 foot trail on either side of the roadway considering they would also have
to provide for a 4 foot boulevard and curb in addition to the street expansion.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1992 MEETING
PAGE 4
After further discussion, Ted Billy moved that the- following recommendations for the widening of
County Road 30 (from Blueberry east to Highway 3), in their order of priority, be made to the County:
1. Move Diffley Road to the south and provide two off-road trails.
2. Provide one off-road trail on the south of Co. Rd. 30 and one on-road trail on the north side.
3. Provide two on-road trails as depicted by the County.
George Kubik seconded the motion with all members voting in favor.
Ted Billy added that he remains concerned about County Road 30 narrowing from five lanes to three
lanes. He stated that this road narrowing could come back to haunt the City as development continues.
He added that even though the trails are called "bike trails" they seem to be considered walking trails and
that use should be strongly considered when the trail location is considered
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
There were no park development issues to be discussed.
WATER QUALITY
There were no water quality Issues to be discussed.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
Some of the items discussed Included the NYSCA certification of 10 ice ringette coaches which had
60+ girls participate this winter. Also discussed was the beginning of a track program through EAA, the
growing number of church groups looking for available ice time for youth group activities, the successful
winter registration with most of the skating lessons filled and the opening of the bandy rink at the Lexington
Diffley athletic site. Dorothy explained that bandy is a cross between soccer, hockey and field hockey. The
bandy rink is 3 times the size (400' long and 225' wide) of the City's regular skating rinks and required
85,000 gallons of water to build the ice. Dorothy added that with the winter activities in full swing the new
Hotline phone number has been used quite extensively.
Other items discussed included the snow removal that needed to be done before flooding of the
rinks could occur. All work was accomplished, however, to allow for a December 20th rink opening. It was
also noted that tree pruning has begun, forestry brochures are being planned and designed, the Arbor Day
celebration will be conducted at Wescott Station Park In 1992, a water quality brochure is in the final
planning stage with a draft copy to be provided at the February commission meeting for comment.
The highlights of planned activities for the Winter Weekend planned for January 31, February 1 and
2 were reviewed with Commission members Invited to participate.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1992 MEETING
PAGE 5
ROUND TABLE
George Kubik mentioned the brainstorming meeting that the Commission had expressed an interest
In participating in. Ken Vraa noted that the original date identified for that purpose was January 23, however
with new Commission members being appointed on January 21, perhaps a rescheduled meeting to include
the new members could be accomplished on February 4th with an anticipated time frame of 1-1/2 hours.
George commented that he appreciated the warmth of the meeting with other Commission members prior
to jumping into his first Commission meeting. Deborah Johnson commented on how impressed she has
been with staff and their preparation of agenda items, Information and workshops. She stated she found
this very helpful with this being her first year on the Commission.
Dick Carroll explained that this was the last Commission meeting he would be attending. He
continued that he had spent 13 very pleasurable years on the Commission but felt it was time to give new
people an opportunity to serve. He stated he had mixed feelings about leaving but wanted the Commission
members and staff to know just how much he has enjoyed participating on the Commission and his
relationship with all the past members and staff.
Chairman Kubik noted that there are always a few "prime movers" in every group and that Dick's
expertise, wisdom and knowledge will be greatly missed. Director Vraa continued that the day Dick Carroll
came to the office with his letter of resignation there were many people with a heavy heart after he left. Ken
continued that over the last 13 years Dick has been a rock of stability for the Commission and a touch stone
for staff. The current Water Quality Plan was completed with a lot of input and Influence from Mr. Carroll.
Ken stated that Dick's quiet force has kept many issues in front of the Council as well as the Commission
and he has been an integral part of some very Important documents including the Park System Plan. It was
noted that Dick has been a very important part of Eagan's history and helped to provide a positive
environment for citizens and developers to share their opinions and Ideas.
Director Vraa then presented a placque of appreciation to Mr. Carroll and invited Commission
members and staff to share cake and coffee after the meeting.
Dick thanked everyone for the kind words and for his pleasurable term as a member of the Advisory
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission.
With no further business to conduct, Dick Carroll moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members
voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 PM.
Secretary
Date
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
RE: FEBRUARY 4, 1992 ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
At the organizational meeting of the Advisory Commission on February 6, the Advisory
Commission will elect its Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary.
The responsibility of the Chairperson is to preside over the Commission meetings and to
represent the Advisory Commission before the City Council, should that situation occur.
The Chair also works with the Director of Parks and Recreation to establish the agenda,
determines the need for special Commission meetings, and with the advise and consent of
the Commission members, make appointments to Ad Hoc study committees.
The Vice-Chair, in the event that the Chair is unable to attend a meeting, assumes the
responsibility of the Chair. The Secretary's responsibility is for correspondence of the
Advisory Commission and also signs all Commission minutes. The duties of the secretary
have changed over the past few years with the department secretary now taking minutes of
the meetings.
Traditionally, the Director of Parks and Recreation takes the nominations for the
appointments to these three positions, and distributes ballots for the election of these
positions.
The Advisory Commission also establishes its standing committees. In the past, the
Commission has used the Recreation Committee, Development and Finance Committee,
Park Naming and Water Quality Committee.
The Recreation Committee meets from three to four times per year and reviews with staff
recreation programming or undertakes studies that could lead to development of new
recreation program offerings.
The Development/Finance Committee has typically been the Commission members as a
whole, with the responsibility for reviewing park sites for potential acquisition. The financial
responsibilities for the committee have been very minimal over the last several years,but of
primary importance when the City was involved heavily in the 1984 Parks Bond issue.
/,8
The Park Naming Committee may not be necessary this year. The only parkland parcels
without official designation are the Lexington Diffley Athletic site and the parkland in the
Manor Lake Addition.
The Water Quality Committee was begun in 1989 to help with the preparation of the Water
Quality Management Plan. That plan has now been adopted. The need for a committee
may still exist. It may be the desire of the Commission to have a sub-committee meet first
to deal with water quality issues before presentation to the Commission as a whole. It may
also be desirable to have a committee that staff could call upon to review strategies, provide
input and assist staff. Last year the Commission chose to act as the "committee".
The Advisory Commission should also set the day and dates for the Commission meetings.
Traditionally, this is the first Thursday of the month. The dates are as follows:
March 5 June 4 September 3 December 3
April 2 July 2 October 1 January 7
May 7 August 6 November 5
Time for the regular meeting would remain at 7:00 PM, recognizing a probable time change
during the summer months to accommodate the traditional park tours the Commission has
been accustomed to take.
KV:cm
EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION
AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission is an appointed
Commission of the City Council of volunteer citizens. The purpose of the Commission is
to advise and make recommendations to the City Council concerning both parks and
recreation issues. The Commission is also charged with the responsibility of over viewing
the Water Quality Management Plan. In addition, the Commission provides input to City
staff, in affect, acts as an advisory board on community interests concerning recreation and
parks.
ORGANIZATION: The Commission consists of 7 members who are appointed by the City
Council for three (3) year terms and 1 alternate who is appointed for a one (1) year term.
Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary are elected annually by the Commission members
at an "organizational meeting" in January/February. Study committees are also organized
at this time. Meetings are held monthly, or at the call of the chairperson.
MEMBERS ROLE: The Advisory Commission work covers a broad range of issues which
must be acted upon in a timely manner. To accomplish this work, regular attendance and
participation by members is essential. Occasionally, the formation of "task" or "study groups"
becomes necessary to look into or work further on more complex issues. Assignments to
these groups is voluntary.
Because regular participation is important to the functioning of the Commission, the City
Council in January of 1974 passed a motion that three consecutive absences by a member
may lead to replacement on the Commission. If members find that commitments prohibit
regular attendance or causes a period of extended absences, they should seriously consider
resigning from the Commission.
Perhaps the most significant responsibility the members have is to keep an open mind to
park issues. Listening, learning and discussion of issues are important aspects of commission
work. Decision making should be based on information gathered and what can be seen as
working towards the betterment of the City and parks and recreation system. Maintaining
objectivity in the face of special interest groups is often difficult, but essential to a balanced
approach to parks. Both long term objectives and short term benefits should be considered
on all issues.
The Advisory Commission acts as a group; disagreement and divergent views are expected
and desirable. However, these views are not to be represented to outside
organizations/committees as being representative of the views of the Advisory Commission
or City. Members need to be certain that they do not express personal views and interests
as that of the City or Parks and Recreation Department.
/5.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
PAGE TWO
P.U.D.
A planned unit development is an agreement between a City and developer/land owner to
develop the land included in the agreement according to a specific criteria; including
residential densities, park land, commercial area, with a proposed time frame for
development. P.U.D.'s run for a period of 5 to 15 years.
SYSTEMS PLAN
A System Plan is a document of intensive study of the park and recreation system to
determine existing deficiencies inland and type of facilities the City needs to provide its
citizens. The study seeks to focus in on specific park needs, prioritize those needs based on
the rest of the park system needs, as well as provide direction for the department in the
development of existing and future parks. Eagan's Plan was prepared in 1982, and officially
adapted in 1983. The plan has been an invaluable tool for guiding park growth in the
1980's. While still a valuable tool, portions of the plan are becoming outdated as a result
of the City's growth.
WATER DUALITY PLAN
The City has developed a "Water Quality" plan intended to deal with non-point source
pollution. This is pollution that typically occurs as a result of development and the
construction of impervious surfaces. The water quality plan identifies and classifies the type
of water bodies and their potential for use i.e., treatment basins, sedimentation ponds, direct
contact, etc. The City has hired a water quality coordinator to work with the program and
the development community in finding ways to reduce pollution with each development
project.
The department has placed greater emphasis on education as a method of reducing the
impact of pollution on ponds and lakes while gaining the understanding of the public and
asking that they make lifestyle changes to help protect Eagan's resources.
RESPONSIBILITY/AUTHORITY
The Commission does not have statutory powers, as do "Park Boards". It is a creation of
the City Council with the responsibility of parks and recreation. The Commission reviews
residential development for recommendation of parks dedication; annually reviews the
budget, provides input regarding programming, hears citizens requests and investigates issues
for recommendation. In addition to the general responsibility of parks and recreation, the
Commission will perform "special" responsibilities as well.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
PAGE THREE
As an example, the Advisory Commission provided input and reviewed the City wide Bicycle
Trails Plan, the need for a System Plan, reviewed plans for park development, and guidance
in the development of the System Plan itself.
STAFF
The City employs a professional administrator for the Parks and Recreation Department
whose responsibility includes the day to day direction and operation of the department and
is directly responsible to the City Administrator and City Council. The director prepares
the operational budget, and with.the staff purchases major equipment items, oversees the
forestry department and park maintenance and development activities as well as gives
direction to the effective operation of recreational programming, etc.
As the position relates to the Advisory Commission, the director prepares the commission's
agenda and support information concerning agenda items. Items require commission action,
informational items on parks and programs are presented by the director and communicated
to the appropriate parties.
The City Administrator and City Planner occasionally attend meetings of the Advisory
Commission and will comment on Council directives, as well as background information
pertaining to City development.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
PARK DEDICATION
The City has enacted an ordinance under Minnesota laws, which grants a community the
authority to receive land for park purposes from residential developers. This dedication is
set at 10% of the land to be available, or if the amount of land is not sufficient to support
a park, a cash dedication is taken. The amount of the cash dedication is based on the type
of residential unit. The Commission annually reviews the fees for possible adjustment. The
cash collected goes into the "park site acquisition and development" fund for purchase
and/or development of parks throughout the community. This dedication requirement was
extended to commercial and industrial property upon recommendation and approval of the
City Council effective January 1, 1983. In 1990, the City adopted a policy for Trails
Dedication which is typically a cash amount. Those funds are to be used solely for
trails/sidewalk construction.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
Required by the Metropolitan Council, the. City prepared a "Comprehensive Guide Plan"
for the City. One segment of the plan includes parks. Neighborhood service areas were
defined to help determine what park needs might be for each portion of the City.
i 7•
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
JOB DESCRIPTION/QUALIFICATIONS
QUALIFICATIONS
1. Resident of the City of Eagan
2. Willingness and dedication to commit both time and personal energy to the
Commission.
3. An interest in both parks, recreation and natural resource issues.
4. Desire to provide a broad range of parks and recreation service to citizens of the
community.
5. Interest in and knowledge of the community of Eagan.
6. Interest in recreation and parks fulfilling a vital role in the quality of life for Eagan
residents.
7. Willingly seeks input from neighborhoods, organizations, and individuals.
8. Ability to maintain an objective approach to both park and recreation issues.
9. Sensitivity towards Eagan resources combined with an understanding of the
community's continuing growth.
RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Attend and participate in regular monthly meetings and special meetings.
2. Attend and participate in appointed study committees which may be required to
conduct the affairs of the Advisory Commission.
3. To make recommendations concerning parks acquisition and development to council
and staff.
4. To review and make recommendations concerning recreation programming.
5. Make recommendation supporting or enhancing the natural resources.
6. Annually elect officers of the Advisory Commission.
7. Provide input into park site planning.
8. Annually reviews the department budget, providing suggestions to staff.
9. Performs fact finding tasks for City Council.
REPORTS TO:
1. City Council
2. Director of Parks and Recreation
PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION:
1. Self evaluation by commission.
2. Regular attendance and participation.
3. Knowledge and satisfaction that the Commission is fulfilling a vital role in the
community.
/9
COMMISSION JOB DESCRIPTION/QUALIFICATIONS
PAGE TWO
CONDITION OF WORK:
1. Three year terms; appointment by Council.
2. No compensation; but a great deal of personal satisfaction to be offered.
DUTIES OF CHAIRPERSON:
1. To preside over regularly scheduled and special commission meetings.
2. To call special meetings of the Advisory Commission when required to conduct the
responsibilities of the Commission.
3. To act as spokes person for the Commission.
4. With the Director of Parks and Recreation, establish a tentative agenda for monthly
meetings.
5. Assign members to special study committees.
6. Advise and consult with individual members concerning their participation on the
committee.
DUTIES OF THE VICE-CHAIRPERSON:
1. In the absence of the chairperson, conduct meeting of the Advisory Commission.
2. To perform assigned task as might be requested from the chairperson.
DUTIES OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION TO THE ADVISORY
COMMISSION:
1. To assist in the development of the agenda and prepare packet material.
2. To act as a liaison to the City Council for the recommendations made by the
Commission.
3. Provide direction and input to the Commission concerning parks dedication and
recreational programming.
4. To perform fundamental research in the study of parks, recreation and natural
resources\water issues.
5. To attend meetings of the Advisory Commission and study. committees.
ao
A COMMISSION MEMBER'S CODE
As a commission member, I believe that the primary purposes of a Commission are
to achieve effective and wise guidance of the department through group thinking and action,
to raise the standards of commission membership and to improve the level of recreation and
park services to the community which supports it.
I realize that mine is a community trust, that I represent all the people and that I
have a duty to the community as well as to my park and recreation department. Ipledge
myself, therefore, to cultivate an "educated heart" so that I may be sensitive to my
obligations and relationships in this trusteeship. I subscribe to the code of an ethical person,
remembering that ethics refers to what a person is morally obliged to do or not to do in a
given situation.
I believe that commission service can be an expression of democratic citizenship
signifying a willingness to accept community responsibility and the charge to preserve
popular control of American public services. Respecting the dignity and worth of the
individual, I shall base my relations with people on their qualities as individuals without
distinction as to race or creed or color or economic or social status. I believe that a
person's greatest possession as well as his greatest contribution to society may lie in the ways
in which he differs from, rather than in the ways in which we are similar. I shall accept
these differences and try to build a useful relationship upon them.
I uphold the principles of my organization, recognizing and assuming my
responsibility as a commission member to establish and administer the best possible
program and policies for my park and recreation department. I shall learn its program and
objectives, give to it a fair share of my time and personal abilities, keep a community wide
perspective knowing that, for sound community service, my department's work must be
coordinated with the total community.
I promise to be loyal to my own organization and a good neighbor to other agencies.
My attitude shall be one of cooperative open-mindedness and objectivity. In carrying out
my assignments, I shall be professional in realizing that it is not possible to lay down
absolute rules for all situations. I shall be willing to think things through with the other
commission members, weighing alternatives and exercising good judgement in choosing
among them.
I have faith in the fellowship of common endeavor, believing that unity is
accomplished through the resolution of differences and not in their suppression. I recognize
the value and the necessity of mutual understanding and teamwork between the commission
and the staff in developing a good department. I realize that the functions of the
commission and the staff are different, but that, with common goals in focus, and with
confidence in and respect for each other, methods of joint participation will not be difficult
to find.
COMMISSION MEMBERS CODE
PAGE TWO
I shall try to be a good commission member: a believer, a planner, a doer, an
interpreter, a prophet, a reformer, a builder, a friend, a good citizen.
Desiring to contribute all that I can to the betterment of my community and its
people, I willingly accept this code for commission members and will be guided by it.
o~oZ
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
RE: FEBRUARY, 1992 CONSENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
1. Town Centre 100 10th Addition - Rovick Realty
A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 1.6 LB (Limited Business)
acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development and a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive-thru facility for a bank located along the
south side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section
15.
The subject parcel is part of Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development
which has previously fulfilled its parks dedication with a land giving of O'Leary Park.
The Planned Development is subject to the construction of trailways according to an
adopted trailways plan.
Recommendation
The proposal shall be required to construct a 6' wide concrete sidewalk along Town
Centre Drive.
SS:cm
a3.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
SUBJECT: CONSENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Town Center 100 10th Addition - Rovick Realty
This preliminary plat application is for a commercial development and includes one lot on
1.59 acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development. The
development will discharge stormwater to Pond DP-20, an existing pond to the east which
is classified as a nutrient trap in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. DP-20
discharges to O'Leary Pond, a Class II lake designated to support indirect contact recreation
activity.
In order to reduce adequately the impact of this development on the quality of water in
O'Leary Pond, an on-site treatment basin would be necessary. However, the site is too
small to accommodate on-site treatment. Therefore, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site
ponding will be required by the City as outlined in the City Water Quality Management
Plan. Based on the actual amount of impervious area shown on the site plan submitted with
the preliminary plat application (69%), the cash dedication is:
0.106 acres X $130,680/acre = $13,852
0.26 acre-feet X 1,613 yd 3/acre X $2/yd. = 839
$14,691
Recommendation
The development should be subject to a cash dedication of $14,691 to satisfy water quality
requirements.
Al-k
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
RB/cm
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992
RE: WATER RESOURCES AND PARKS/TRAILWAYS ANALYSIS FOR WESTON
HILLS DEVELOPMENT
Introduction
The City has a received a request to rezone approximately 64 acres
of land 36 from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family Residential. A
preliminary plat application has also been received for a
residential development containing up to 132 lots. The development
would be located east of Highway 3, south of Cliff Road in the east
1/2 of section 36.
Water Management
Issues
There are two primary water resources management issues associated
with this development. The first is what requirement the developer
must meet to satisfy water quality treatment standards for new
developments as outlined in the city water quality management plan.
The second is a concern first articulated by residents who live
adjacent to the proposed development regarding the effect of the
development on the volume of runoff to Pond LP-27.
Background
This development is located in the upper reach of drainage basin L
(Figure 1). This drainage basin contains a high concentration of
recreational class lakes immediately adjacent to, and downstream
of, the proposed development. These lakes include lakes LP-26, LP-
28 (Manor Lake), and LP-31 (Hay Lake), all of which are Class II
indirect contact recreation lakes, and LP-32 (Schwanz Lake)
designated as a Class I direct contact recreation lake. The City
water quality management plan indicates any degradation in the
water quality of these lakes is unacceptable. In addition, the
City is currently engaged in a joint effort with the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency to restore water quality in Schwanz Lake
to meet the water quality goals established for that lake in the
plan.
Pond LP-27, a 3.2 acre water body classified as a wildlife habitat
pond, lies along a portion of the southern border of the site.
Water Quality
Maximum protection of recreational class lakes off-site will
require construction of an on-site pond to treat runoff from the
development, especially runoff from paved surfaces. Under the
current site plan, all paved surfaces and about 45 acres of the
development will drain to the north toward Cliff Road. The
remaining land-almost all of which will be yards- will continue to
drain to Pond LP-27, classified in the City. water quality
management plan as wildlife habitat.
On-site ponding to treat runoff from the proposed development is
both desirable and feasible. Based on results from the city water
quality model and pond design program, the pond must have a minimum
wet volume of 5.2 acre-feet, a minimum surface area of 1.05 acres
at the normal water elevation, and a minimum mean depth of 5.1 feet
and should be constructed according to National Urban Runoff
Program (NURP) standards. Consistent with design standards, a
minimum 10 foot wide bench with a 10:1 slope should be constructed
just below the normal water level to meet safety requirements.
Finally a skimmer should be constructed on the outlet to prevent
floating debris from moving downstream and accumulating in lakes
lower in the drainage. The pond should be located to intercept
runoff from all paved areas of the development.
Pond LP-27 Water Supply
Residents adjacent to this pond have expressed concern about the
effect that the development as currently proposed will have on
overland drainage to Pond LP-27 which lies along the southern
border of the development site. The historical behavior of the
pond described by residents indicates that the pond is very
dependent on overland runoff from its current natural drainage area
of about 37 acres to maintain storage. Accounts also indicate that
even in the present condition, the pond level falls rapidly in
response to seasonal drought conditions.
The current site plan would decrease the drainage area of Pond LP-
27 to about 18.5 acres and-when changes in runoff characteristics
are taken into account-decrease by about 33% the average annual
runoff to the pond.
There are three principle options to deal with this issue:
1. Divert runoff from a portion of the development directly
into the pond to restore the runoff contribution.
2. Divert treated water from the constructed on-site pond and
route that water to the south into LP-27 instead of to the
north toward Cliff Road.
3. Make no change in the proposed site plan to route all
drainage from the paved surfaces away from LP-27 to the north
toward Cliff Road.
The main advantage of Option 1 is that the volume of runoff to LP
27 that occurs under pre-development conditions could be restored.
The main disadvantage is that the stormwater would be untreated and
would degrade water quality not only in LP-27 but in downstream
higher priority lakes as well. Construction of another treatment
pond for this water would likely force the City to re-visit the
issue of balancing protection of water quality with protection of
trees and habitat around LP-27 and force the loss of additional
lots in the development.
The main advantage of option 2 is that only treated water from the
development would be diverted to LP-27, satisfying water quality
treatment concerns. In addition, the drainage basin for LP-27
would exceed what it is in the natural condition. This should make
water levels in LP-27 less susceptible to short-term fluctuations
in precipitation patterns. There are several other factors to be
considered as well. An inlet and outlet would need to be
constructed in LP-27 to prevent local flooding problems. This will
create some disturbance to vegetation. Construction of the inlet
would be the developers responsibility while construction of an
outlet to rout high flows under Highway 3 to Pond LP-26 would be
carried out by the City. Finally, a pond easement would need to be
granted to the City for all of LP-27 by all shoreland owners.
Option 3 would satisfy basic water quality treatment requirements
for the development but would not sustain historical pond
elevations in LP-27. Water levels in LP-27 would likely drop until
runoff from prospective future developments in the area is routed
to the pond.
Staff Recommendations
Based on information available at the present time, staff
recommends the following:
1. That the development be subject to an on-site ponding
requirement, that the pond be constructed to National Urban Runoff
Program (NURP) design standards, and that the pond meet the
requirements for wet volume, surface area, and mean depth
identified in the above narrative. In addition, the pond should
include a skimmer.
2. That staff work with the developer and the Public Works
Department to investigate the feasibility of routing treated runoff
water to Pond LP-27 and securing easements from all shoreland
owners. If this option is infeasible, then the original proposal to
rout stormwater from the treatment pond to the north toward Cliff
Road should be pursued to protect water quality in priority lakes
in the drainage.
Parks/Trailways
Background
The Commissions action at the January 9 meeting to acquire a park
south of this development area within Park Service 36E indicates a
preference for a cash dedication in lieu of a parkland dedication
for the proposed Weston Hills development.
Staff Recommendation
1. The proposal should be subject to a cash parkland dedication
2. The proposal should be subject to a cash trailway dedication.
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
S ph n S llivan
ndsca9 Architect/Parks Planner
c.
CL V 39.
C J
9
FIGURE ]
c '--,X+ Cf D O. 42 N
7
52
--fit'"V r CL. IV CL. V
a-r-
ti R
ODD
FARM
PT
.I LP-611 ~
CL. V A S"11 PARK
LAKE 11
VI PA
L; M zF
HTS.
P7 _v -IQI~K ` LP-67
S P- 7 CL. V11
CL V -30
L ^a"'- X16 L. It
29
IF -
LP-45 >
CL. 11
01 P
21 LP-24
LP-
dl
LP-19 MORON!
CL. t Location of Development
LP-22 is dDG. --Af>~-
CL. 12
CL.
LP-66
CL. I V
P-17 ! ll i R
t d9
EJEMOUN
0 1000, 2000 5000,
1/2 Mile I Mile
N
Bonestroo
~J¦ Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
byin., i Arcfrtecn OC ( .
APRIL 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE
COMMISSION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1992
RE: WEXFORD ADDITION
PROPOSAL
An application has been received requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from
mixed residential to single family, rezoning of 36.1 acres to R-1 and a preliminary plat of
sixty-five (65) lots.
The subject parcel is located within the southwest corner of the intersection of Thomas Lake
Road and County Road #30. (See Figure #1)
BACKGROUND
The Commission had previously reviewed a proposal for this parcel in April of 1988. The
Stratford Oaks Addition included 328 apartment units. The Commission recommended a
cash parkland dedication providing partial credit for on-site recreation facilities. The final
plat for this proposal was approved via City Council action, but never recorded with Dakota
County.
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW
The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding the following
items:
1. What is the parkland dedication for this proposal?
2. What is the trails dedication for this proposal?
3. What is the developmental impact to the woodland resource?
ANALYSIS/PARKS DEDICATION
The subject site is within Park Service Area #28. The neighborhood parks which serve the
proposed area are Evergreen and Downing Parks. Also, Thomas Lake Community Park and
Heine Pond Park provide specialized recreational benefits. As a result of adequate
parkland and recreation facilities within the Park Service Area, staff recommends a cash
parkland dedication.
WEXFORD ADDITION
JANUARY 14, 1992
PAGE TWO
The current proposal is for sixty-five (65) lots. The 1992 Park Dedication Policy depicts a
$700 cash parkland dedication per residential unit. This rate equates to a cash parkland
dedication of $45,500.00.
A 1.9 acre parcel within this subdivision was purchased from the owners of the adjacent
Thomas Lake Heights Addition. This 1.9 acre had previously fulfilled its parkland
dedication. Therefore, there is a need for an equitable adjustment in the parkland
dedication amount. The current proposal has a gross density of 1.80 units per acre. Based
on this density, the 1.9 acre equates to 3.42 units. The cash parks dedication equivalent is
$2,394.00. Therefore the total cash parks dedication obligation, including the 1.9 acre credit
is for $43,106.00.
ANALYSIS/TRAILS DEDICATION
The 1992 Trails Dedication Policy requires a cash obligation at a rate of $100.00 per unit.
The platting of sixty-five (65) lots at $100.00/lot equates to a trails dedication of $6,500.00.
The 1.9 acre parcel had not previously fulfilled trailway obligation and therefore, is subject
to the Trails Dedication Policy.
ANALYSIS YOODLAND RESOURCE
The site can be characterized as having three areas of significant woodlands. (See Figure
#2) Woodland #1 is located central to the site and is approximately five (5) acres in size.
The topography is a wooded ridge line surrounding a depression. The depression area is
being proposed for a small water quality pond. Approximately 0.5 acres of box elders will
be removed with the grading of the pond. The pond layout preserves the adjacent oak trees.
Along the east ridge line, house pads and backyard side slopes take approximately 0.4 acres
of aspen, box elders, cherry and oak trees. The tree survey indicates the loss of a 25" and
26" diameter oak tree within a 10' depth fill section. A wooded ravine extends to the west.
This area is characterized with significant aspen, oak and cherry trees. It encompasses
approximately 0.75 acres. The ravine is approximately 400' long with steep side slopes of
25 to 40%. The flow line gradient ranges from 7.5% to 12%. These steep slopes result in
an highly erodible condition which is incompatible in an urban landscape. The length of the
ravine bisects the western 1/3 of the site. Therefore, the removal of these trees and
regrading results in a compatible development layout which eliminates the erosion problem.
Approximately 3.35 acres of woodland #1 will be preserved after development. Woodland
#2 is a 0.5 acres oak depression located along the northern property line adjacent to
County Rd #30. A majority of the trees will be preserved,
WEXFORD ADDITION
JANUARY 14, 1992
PAGE THREE
although the adjacent oak savanna eco-system will result in some significant individual tree
removal. The third woodland area is within the southeast corner of the site, adjacent to
Thomas Lake Heights Second Addition. This 0.5 acre woodland is characterized by aspen,
cherry and oak vegetation. A majority of these trees will be preserved with development.
Some tree loss will occur with the grading of adjacent house pads and the filling of a small
ravine.
Staffs evaluation regarding the preservation of the woodland resource with the development
of the parcel concludes a relative sensitivity on the part of the developer. The down zoning
to a R-1 land use, low density, and development layout preserves a significant amount of the
woodland resource. Staff recommends that the developer submit a tree protection plan
which places snow fencing at the grading limits adjacent to significant trees. These fences
would provide some protection to the trees from accidental grading. The developer would
contact the City after fence installation and prior to grading for inspection of tree
preservation.
COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider the following recommendations:
1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication.
2. The cash park dedication amount shall provide a credit of 3.40 units to the
subdivision.
3. The proposal shall be subject to a cash trailways dedication.
4. The developer submit a tree protection plan to the City for review and approval prior
to final plat.
5. The developer install a snow fence adjacent to significant woodland. The snow fence
would be inspected and approved by the City prior to any grading.
...ter .
M \ 1 •.r
7-7
I \ r .
RIK
SITE
C ~I
34:
Drawn By: Drawing Titer
S.R.S. Wexford Addition
Dote: I Area Location Map ?7aUM wo•
1/14/92 L j ¦ 1
/
Ile
~ J
/ I I \ I I ` r /
T-w
own By: 'Mowing Title
S.R.S. Wexford Addition
Dote: V ~Ql Woodland Areas f'° No•
1/14/92 2
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER QUALITY COORDINATOR
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992
SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR WEXFORD ADDITION
Proposal
The city has received a request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change land
use from mixed residential to single family residential, and a preliminary plat application
for a residential development consisting of 65 lots located along the south side of Diffley
Road west of Thomas Lake Road in the north 1/2 of Section 28.
For Commission Review
The Commission will need to review and made a recommendation regarding whether the
development should be subject to a ponding requirement or a cash dedication requirement
to meet water quality standards set by the city in it's Water Quality Management Plan.
Water Quality Analysis
This 36 acre single family residential development is located in drainage basin B which
eventually drains to Blackhawk Lake. Blackhawk Lake is designated in the city's Water
Quality Management Plan as one of six Class I lakes identified to support direct contact
recreation. Blackhawk Lake does not currently meet the water quality standards necessary
to support this use. In addition, on-site ponding is feasible for this development, so a pond
could be required to treat runoff from the site.
In order to provide adequate for runoff from the development, a treatment pond could be
constructed in the depression in the middle of the development. To meet water quality
standards the pond would need a wet pond volume of 3.2 acre feet, a minimum surface area
at the normal water elevation of .72 acres, and a mean depth of 4.4 feet. The pond should
be constructed according to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design standards.
Consistent with these design standards, a minimum 10 foot wide bench with a 10:1 slope
should be maintained around the edge of the pond just below the normal water level to
meet safety requirements. The pond should also include a skimmer on the outlet, and the
inlet should be separated from the outlet to the maximum extent possible.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
JANUARY 30, 1992
PAGE 2.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the development be subject to on-site ponding requirement, that the
pond be constructed according to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design
standards, and that the pond meet the requirements for volume, surface area, and mean
depth identified in the above narrative. In addition, the outlet on the pond should include
a skimmer.
Rich Brasch
Water Quality Coordinator
RB/nab
3B:wexford.add
~7
- / H HTSI n.y!Y
' ~ r
]Do
N ADD. `i01
C P -12 / L+ l
r-f
CL. VII POXIC , V; 2nd l+ ) \~I T 'Q, EA DCtD. T
RKS 1ST
OLM ROY 0 K -w CARRIAGE
FIGURE ] ? °4 HILLS
CI
~ / ri s GOLF
7,. c? - >ao C JL CL. VII
*tee L
/ ~N01 u - RSV
LAM it
C L T-42
CL. VI
-32.2
C,~--
L. VI
C 'REM
j ACK FI
12
JP-
r JP-11 " zR~ K <
J I !ru+r CL. V WL!!,,IAMB 9
X)4 JP-4 AliUE ADD
BP JP- 11.1
- IV
3LACKHAft. CL. V
PARK 27. -4AL_ ? l ARK -48- r.= - -
-10
LIP
3P-29.1 ;7-' ~,ZMWPALE
Uhl
CL. VII
KCvOA -L .4VI I
2" 36"
CL VII JP-35 -q -iOSF,R~~
Wit
R I TRH
9
BP-3 . V I # --.-1
P= ti
?v ~~=1 + VI, RK _
QL. V ' EEVWCTL' t7. PL-35 *a _ a
JP ncN _ J 33
CL. V CL.
BP-25 -4 BP-4 -1ARK CL., i H1C
CL.VII CL.VII BP r~
13E H r- _ Z:N -29.1
B 2~ 8 P I w TtHrrot a ~Q~t. 11
.aa - N =
42 a CL VLI ati _ a"r. G F - < RCNKC~ ; -4 ill -LAZA
BP LP- 43 GL. VII
SiCL . CL. II Er-ctiG _sr AM. JJ
'f ILI
.H--,~ - orgy
23
-EXINGTON
=01NTE
ti CL: Location of Development
• La WALNdt v i
'I!q i~ HILL
A
11 2: B' t Z Y _
7W
SAFAR J LP-3
AT N r L! I CL. it
E BP- A 2q-,
E p 1 f ~ _ ~ Ib
CL. V
34
VII ~6g
I. -21 LP-38
C IL. 1
L. IV
~M~Aifi~ y A KO TA
COUNTY LP-o,
February 4, 1992
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCE COMMISSION
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan Mn 55121
RE: Wexford Addition (Eagan 40 Site)
Dear Commission Members,
On February 6th, you will review the cash park and trail
dedication requirements for Wexford. In making your analysis, we
believe it is important for you to have our perspective of the
history and circumstances relating to this site.
This site was originally purchased in the 1970's by Eagan 40
Limited Partnership. Initially, development activity and proposals
were put on hold for the resolution of the alignment of I-35E. In
the 1980's, the parcel was the subject of a number of proposals
from apartment developers for up to 338 high density apartment
units, compatible with its zoning. The most recent of these was
from Trammel Crow Company for the Stratford Oaks complex. As a
result of financing difficulties, none of these proceeded with
construction.
The current proposal for 65 single family homesites clearly is
in the best interests of and consistent with the goals of the City
of Eagan and its staff. As a voluntary down-zoning, our proposal
is a gift to the City which carries significant fiscal impacts to
the Eagan 40 as development costs must now be distributed against
65 lots rather than 338 apartments.
Eer n
at Woodbury
1370 Donegal Drive, Woodbury, Minnesota 55125, 612/738-0555.
Another luxurious environment created by nature and Dan Dolan Development, Inc.
In light of this voluntary rezoning, we are requesting that
the City of Eagan reduce its park and trail dedication fees from
their normal rates of $700/lot and $100/lot, respectively. Such a
reduction would assist Eagan 40 in providing more site amenities
such as perimeter landscape screening, which will only add to
Wexford's positive impacts on the adjacent neighborhood and the
city as a whole.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
EAGAN 40 LIMITED PART IP
BY* mes . Johnston
Pres/ eral Manager
DAN D DEVELOPMENT, INC.
CC: Stephen Sullivan
Dan Dolan
JWJ:geb
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE
COMMISSION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER .
DATE: JANUARY 21, 1992
RE: HAWTHORNE ADDITION
PROPOSAL
An application has been received requesting the rezoning of 51 acres from agriculture to R-
1, Single Family and the preliminary plat of 97 lots.
The subject parcel is located south of County Road #30, north of Autumn Ridge Addition,
east of Dodd Road and west of State Highway #3. (See Figure #1)
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW
The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following
items:
1. What is the parkland dedication for this proposal?
2. What is the trails dedication for this proposal?
3. What is the developmental impact to the woodland resource?
ANALYSIS/PARKS DEDICATION
The site is within Park Service Area #25W. The neighborhood parks which serve the
proposed development are Lakeside and South Oak Parks. Adequate parkland and
recreation facilities exist within the Park Service Area, therefore staff recommends a cash
parkland dedication.
The current proposal is for 97 single family lots. The 1992 Parks Dedication Policy requires
$700.00 cash parks dedication per residential unit. This rate equates to a cash parkland
dedication of $67,900.00.
3g.
HAWTHORNE ADDITION
PAGE TWO
JANUARY 21, 1992
ANALYSIS/TRAILS DEDICATION
The 1992 Trails Dedication Policy requires a cash rate of $100.00 per unit. The platting of
97 lots at $100 per unit equates to a dedication of $9,700.00.
The Comprehensive Trails Plan proposes trailways along both sides of Dodd Road and
County Road #30. The Commission's recent review of the attached trailway configuration
betweens Dodd Road and State Hwy. #3, with the improvement of County Road #30, may
influence the pedestrian corridor layout servicing this area. The Commission may recall
that the Autumn Ridge Subdivision is responsible for the construction of a 6' concrete
sidewalk along Hackmore Drive. This sidewalk provides safe and efficient pedestrian
circulation to Pinewood Elementary School and to Dodd Road. A secondary benefit is that
the sidewalk provides linkage to Lakeside Park (See Figure #2). The current proposal
indicates a neighborhood collector road called Hawthorne Woods Drive. The proposed
road intersects with Hackmore Drive and County Road #30. Staff recommends that the
Comprehensive Trails System Plan be revised to include a 6' wide concrete sidewalk along
the south side of proposed Hawthorne Woods Drive and a short link along Hackmore Drive.
(See Figure #3). This proposed sidewalk will provide several benefits by integrating the
pedestrian circulation within this area. First, it will provide safe and efficient pedestrian
circulation to Pinewood Elementary. School and Dodd Road. Second, a sidewalk will
provide continued linkage to Lakeside Park. Lastly, a sidewalk will provide an alternative
route to the proposed detached trailway on County Road #30, west of Dodd Road. The
attached trailway system plan for County Road #30, east of Dodd, may not be considered
desirable for some pedestrians.
A study committee of City Staff has recently reviewed and made recommendation regarding
impacts on city trails and streets. The committee indicated in their report of January 17,
1992, a problem of off street parking by residents which impedes safe and efficient
pedestrian circulation. The situation is that the typical 60' right-of-way, 34' width residential
road, with a 1' trail offset, 30' front yard setback, does not allow for double stacked driveway
parking without blocking the trail. Also the boulevard width does not provide adequate
safety zone or snow storage. (See Figure #4A) Offsetting the road providing a balance
boulevard provides adequate safety zone and snow storage area but does not provide for an
unimpeded trail corridor. (See Figure #4B). The increase of the R.O.W. width to 65',
utilizing a balanced boulevard, 6' trail offset and 30' front yard setback provides adequate
safety zone, snow storage and an unimpeded trail corridor. (See Figure #4C) The final
scenario utilizes a 60' right-of-way, balanced boulevard, 1' trail offset but revises the front
yard setback from 30' to 35'. This provides for adequate safety zone, snow storage and an
unimpeded trail corridor. (See Figure #4D) In summary, the typical 60' right-of-way and
30' front yard setback does not accommodate sidewalks along residential roads. A sidewalk
can be unimpeded by double stacked residential parking with either an increased setback
HAWTHORNE ADDITION
PAGE THREE
JANUARY 21, 1992
or right-of-way width. Subject to the Commission recommending an unimpeded sidewalk,
the Planning Commission and/or City Council would review the increased setback or right
of way width alternatives.
Once a sidewalk location was determined, the developer should grade the trail at a 10'
oversized width. The developer should provide a 10' clear zone free of any encumbrances.
(i.e. hydrants, light poles, telephone/cable pedestals, hand holes, gate value boxes, cleanouts,
manholes.....) Pedestrian ramps should be installed at all street intersections.
ANALYSIS/WOODLAND RESOURCE
The site can be characterized as having three areas of differing woodland quality. (See
Figure #5). The area south of the dot delineation is primarily secondary growth. It appears
that a majority of this area was once cleared and the existing vegetation has established over
the past ten to twenty years. The development plan indicates the preservation of tree
masses along the south property line and adjacent to the westerly pond. North of the
delineating dots is Oak and Aspen woodlands of varying densities, sizes and composition.
Woodland area #2 is predominantly aspen with scattered small and larger diameter oaks.
Three areas of preservation are depicted within woodland area #2. A 100' X 400' woodland
preservation is proposed to the west. Two small preservation areas are located centrally and
along State Highway #3. Staff evaluation of the proposed grades and development layout
within woodlands area #2 concludes that any additional significant preservation would result
in major revision in the development proposal. Woodland Area #3 contains the highest
number of large oak trees and the highest quality woods within the development. The
development plan indicates a "relative" sensitivity in regards to preservation with tree masses
surrounding the three proposed cul-de-sacs. The proposed significant tree removal, although
unfortunate, tends to be a sensitive result to an inevitable urban landscape.
The developer proposes a "pad" grading approach. Atypical to the prepared pad approach,
and prior to the grading operation, the road center lines will be staked and field reviewed.
Specific lots and trees will be evaluated regarding. the viability of preservation utilizing a
"custom" design approach.. This lot specific field approach will inevitably save individual
trees which can not be depicted at the scale of the site plan.
Within Woodland Area #2 a storm water pond is proposed. The pond construction will
result in the removal of some trees. The pond is located within the natural watershed for
this parcel. Opportunity for the deletion of this pond may occur with the development of
off-site storm sewer ponding as part of the County Road #30 road improvement. Staff
suggests that the developer, City Engineering Department and Dakota County work in
conjunction in determining whether the proposed storm sewer pond could be removed from
the subject parcel.
4,.
HAWTHORNE ADDITION
PAGE FOUR
JANUARY 21, 1992
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider the following recommendations:
1. The proposal shall be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
2. The proposal shall be subject to a cash trails dedication.
3. The Comprehensive Trails Systems Plan be amended to include a sidewalk along the
south side of Hawthorne Woods Drive.
4. The development plan be revised to accommodate an unimpeded sidewalk corridor
from double stacked residential parking along the south side of Hawthorne Woods
Drive and east side of Hackmore Drive.
5. The developer grade a 10' wide trail bench north of the south R.O.W. of Hawthorne
Woods Drive and west of the east right-of-way of Hackmore Drive. The developers
shall be responsible in assuring that a 10' wide area be clear of all encumbrances.
Pedestrian ramps shall be installed at all street intersections.
6. The developer provide a tree protection plan prior to final plat that shall be reviewed
and approved by City staff.
7. The developer install fencing adjacent to significant woodlands consistent with the
approved tree protection plan. The fencing will be inspected and approved by City
staff prior to any grading.
8. The developer work with Eagan Engineering Department and Dakota County
determining whether the proposed storm sewer pond could be removed from the
proposal to an off-site pond.
DI R'S SU No. 42 EG N
N N I M.•w n: Kira. ~ I
= I w.' wo.t.n
t / ~ ~ .ounuls Iw
1 N
I ~ t
1. •7i.STE1~6 ADJ. 1 .r
sow 6
DETAILED VICIWITY MAP
own By: ts Drawing Title
S.R.S. Hawthorne Woods Addition
Dote V - Are. Location Map fteY11E aio.
1114/92
i,~:W.~.. - hl I r -
AU IIT 1 r Ui 42 LAisANI
I --1,
i LAKESIDE PARK
Drown By Drawing Title
S.R.S. 'p - Autumn Ridge Addition
Dote Sidewalk Plan F swK 180.
1/14/92 2
Ira ,..a• ewe r../ - - - - - - 1 - - - T " `1
M-•- 1 T-
AUDI-FORS SUB 'W 4Z EAGAN
I I I 1~ ~ 1 Is
I 1 pwrt I I . I -'ti
r-L
111 I' , Q I r
f j1. , 1
LAKESIDE PARK
QWm By: is Drawing Title
$.R.S.
Hawthorne Woods Addition
V Proposed Sidewalk Plan Fti~IQE •o.
tilt
Dote
1'T'
13` t-1'
pa.a/p. s~?fl1NA+`~ e~~IV
60' R.O.W./ROAD CENTERED UNBALANCED BLVD/TRAIL 1' OFFSET/30' SETBACK
FWD fi- a!~LYfl' ~L3dE.1L
~a0
60' R.O.W./OFFSET ROAD/BALANCED BLVD/TRAIL 1' OFFSET/30' SETBACK
1"?' t"1 ~
~ C - e o TL R.O.W./OFFSET ROAD/BALANCED BLVD/TRAIL 6' OFFSET/30' SETBACK
~tT581~ \ _ ;g~~L)pE
t-W
COO'
60' R.O.W./OFFSET ROAD/BALANCED BLVD/TRAIL 1' OFFSET/35'REVISED SETBACK
4.
Down 8y: » Drawing Title
sue,
Date: noun Wo'
• 'r'~F. _ rj„'-? - f ~ iii
i f
' .t ti ~ - i ~:C aptly'
-ST3
N
d
w
CO
Oft
- 1,
fit
,own By: 3rowing Titip
S.R.S. •Q Hawthorn Woods Addition
Dote: Woodland Evaluation nouaE No.
1/14/92 5
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCE COORDINATOR
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR
HAWTHORNE WOODS ADDITION - LYMAN DEVELOPMENT
Proposal
The City has received a request to rezone approximately 51 acres from agricultural to R-1
Single Family Residential and a Preliminary Plat application for a residential development
consisting of 97 lots. The development is to located east of Dodd Road, South of Diffley
Road in the north 1/4 of Section 25.
For Commission Review
The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the
development should be subject to a ponding requirement, a cash dedication requirement,
or a combination of ponding and cash dedication in order to meet city water quality
treatment requirements.
Water Ouality Analysis
This single family residential development is located in the upper reach of drainage basin
J.(Figure 1) About 5.7 acres on the west side of the development will drain to Pond JP-68,
a recreational class pond designated for wildlife habitat in the city's water quality
management plan. The remainder of the site will drain to the north. All of the site will
generate runoff that will eventually reach first Fish Lake then Blackhawk Lake. Fish and
Blackhawk Lakes are two of six Class I lakes identified in the City Water Quality
Management Plan and are intended to have good enough water quality to support direct
contact recreation. Neither lake currently meets the water quality standard set for it in the
plan.
The city will construct off site to the north of the development several wet ponds to treat
runoff from most of the proposed development as well as some outside areas. The
developer will, however, construct a small settling basin contiguous with JP-68 that will
partially treat runoff entering JP-68 from Hackmore Drive. The effective surface area and
wet volume of this pond is estimated at .1 acres and .15 acre feet. The remainder of the
water quality obligation for the development could be met with a cash dedication, reduced
to reflect the credit for the small pond at the southeast corner of JP-68.
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 2.
Using the method outlined in the City Water Quality Management Plan, a cash dedication
for this development would be as follows:
Pond Surface Area Requirement
(.93 ac. - .1 ac.) x $16,330/ac. _ $13,553
Pond Volume Requirement
(4.6 of - .15 af) x 1613 cu. yds./
of x $2/cu. yd. _ $14,355
TOTAL CASH DEDICATION = $27,908
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the development include a small pond proposed in the development
plan at the southeast corner of JP-68 and that the remainder of the development be subject
to a cash water quality dedication in the amount of $27,908.
Rich Brasch
Water Quality Coordinator
RB/nab
Attachment
3B:APRNRC.030
X11 l_ I , i u 1 1 %111 i 111111 I))11111 } _ _ _ 1 _1_, t \
T)p
M JP=19u1
J`Il lL L.Vi JP-58q 0 CL. V0 'T
P l ITI 11) {"qi h CL. IV \,Ia
FIGURE
VII CL t') I> JP-5
CL. V
JP- 20.1 JPc"$ RRIM F~ 101 4!A1r f Y ti CL. V ) 54
7~77 _
jy11i<1i L- VII
J-23
CL V
42 -3
i! JP -2
cL v
VII RK AN - Fn f r2" f CY,
12° JP-25.1
J P- 3!4 4 A Ij L V O T k10
,IP- 2 CL.ii ILS m l~ jC
ADON L.S.
P 271 k P2
L.;V LVAZ -tj
, -KIRC NNf~ O. , S•
F,- j tit. dt ~c z ,t11111 ( I-MA F \ r
EAraN S~„ 9~ 1
LUtN.
it€egfF ! b12 ti3_j i!~'i ~~r~ cMUracr+ I
` Ist A(
DD PO 1 CL
a 1 ~ /
71 ~ I
IEKINGION Z11 ~t \ u ~4 DC)[)C} I
POINTF (nR~
L(jTI(1 LP-61.1
-P 9.1 CL. V i } n Location of Development
CL. wall L, VI
X
HILL 6LP '30
Sr;1 Z I M(f . !2"
re5 r+ F Arrr _ MFP
,
'PAY A~ lrl,7. - 1115. 7 w ~j 1 I 7
} ~k LP GL. f i(r L d f011N 12" y?t
LP-37
$ r~? I_P-67
I; CL. 11
~i a3 V I I LP- CL. VII
LP -30
LPIt 1Lf7 n, :+VI iT P:='3 { CL VI
hI 1 ~iLi to ,
45 q28 j;`
LP-38
C L.
rf'
P 15
P; 6
-VAKOTA C IV L.11
COUNTY LP-21 LP-24 r Z~ r2„ ` y,~r Q
CL. IV
PARK LP-27
CL. IV 'f CL. I
12 " CL. IV
- •h
VrFPlr?I ,r t O
1N'_iT TNrt CIF( LP-19 MORONI
ADD
cL.l
L
"RIR rz
JE~
cL.l P-22 LL ? 1A
.
:-23
V
I r
LP-15 LP-66
CL. It CL. IV
} 1 P-17 R
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992
RE: CONCESSIONS, NORTHVIEW ATHLETIC FIELDS - REPORT
BACKGROUND
At the December 5, 1991, Commission meeting, staff presented a Concessions Report
(attached) which gives information regarding the partnership arrangement between the City
and the Adult Softball Leagues. The Commission recommended that the department
propose a 50/50 split of concession profits when the concessions are operated by a league
team for tournament events. Normally, concessions are operated by the City for league
play.
MEETING WITH LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE
Department staff met with the League Leadership Committee to review with them the City's
concern and need to increase program revenue. While the Leadership Committee
recognized the City's need to generate new revenue, they also emphasized the fact that the
Leagues have made significant contribution to the City, i.e., field fencing, concessions
equipment, as well as provided volunteer labor for field improvement projects. The
Committee felt that a 50/50 split is excessive given the limited amount of profits generated
and the work effort involved. The committee proposed a lesser fee.
COMMITTEE COMPROMISE
The Committee proposed a sliding scale based on net proceeds: $25.00 for the first $200.00
profit; $50.00 from $200 to $400 profit; $75.00 between $400 and $600.00 profit and $100
over $600.
The rationale for this fee schedule is the amount of work effort the teams must put into the
concessions to make it work. Higher rates would clearly "discourage" teams from taking the
risk and putting out the work effort.
STAFF RESPONSE
After additional discussion with the League Leadership Committee and the efforts required
by a team to put on an event, staff concurs with the Committee's conclusions regarding the
work effort and the profits generated; the ratio is such that a 50/50 split is excessive and no
team would be interested in operating the concessions for these tournaments. Historically,
proceeds earned by the teams have ranged considerably with weather and the number of
teams being the major variables.. Given the Commission's direction to negotiate with the
League Leadership Committee on this issue; staff has accepted this compromise position for
implementation in 1992. Staff will continue to monitor the policy this year and report back
to the Commission the results of its implementation.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION
AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
FROM: JOHN K. VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON CITY LANDSCAPING ORDINANCES
At a recent Commission meeting, a request was made that staff provide an update on the
status of the city's landscaping ordinances and in particular those sections of the ordinance
dealing with landscape preservation and tree replacement in new subdivisions. It is the
intention of this memorandum to respond to this information request of the Commission as
well as offering an opportunity for newer Commission members to become familiar with the
City's landscaping policies. In addition, staff will be making a verbal presentation at the
February meeting and will be available to respond to any questions or comments that the
Commission may have.
BACKGROUND
In June of 1989, staff from the Departments of Parks and Recreation, Community
Development, and Public Works /Engineering began work on a comprehensive revision of
the City's landscaping ordinances. This process was initiated at the urging of the City
Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission who recognized the benefits of
developing a more "pro active" landscape ordinance addressing tree preservation, tree
replacement, and overall community tree conservation.
The ordinance revision process was divided into two primary components. The first
component dealt with the establishment of a new city landscape preservation and tree
replacement ordinance as it pertains to new land development and residential subdivisions.
The Community Development Division took the primary lead in drafting those particular
sections. The second component dealt with the "post development" landscape ordinances
affecting the maintenance of trees on private property, along streets, and in public places.
The city Parks/Recreation Department and Forestry Division did the majority of research
and ordinance amendments to these sections.
Over a twelve month period, a special "landscape ordinance committee" - comprised of
representatives from the three departments named above, along with a consultant from
Urban Planning and Design Inc. - met to discuss and review proposed changes to the city's
landscaping ordinances. This structure of the committee was considered essential toward
ensuring close coordination between affected departments, personnel and regulatory
instruments.
`5"3.
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 2.
In addition to internal communications, input of the public was also solicited on the
proposed ordinance revisions. City staff met with the Developers Task Force to gain their
reaction to the new ordinances, particularly those policy changes being suggested for new
subdivisions. The Parks and Recreation Commission was also kept up to date throughout
the revision process and was asked for their input at several key decision making points.
On May 3, 1990, Park Superintendent John VonDeLinde, along with John Voss of Urban
Planning and Design presented the proposed "final" draft of the city's development and post
development landscape ordinances to the Parks and Recreation Commission. At that
meeting the Commission endorsed the final draft of the ordinances and recommended their
approval to the City Council. Likewise, the Planning Commission approved the same series
of ordinance revisions at their April 24, 1990 meeting.
On July 17, 1990, staff of the Parks and Recreation Department presented to the City
Council the final recommendation of the Commission dealing with proposed changes to the
post-development landscaping ordinances. The City Council subsequently adopted the post-
development ordinances without change from the Commission's recommendation.
POST-DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCES
The post development landscape ordinances adopted by the Council and Commission
contain four primary sections:
• Shade tree disease control
• Planting and maintenance of trees on private property
• Tree contractor licensing
• Planting and maintenance of trees on public right-of-way
The adoption of the post-development landscape ordinance has led to a number of
efficiencies and improvements in the urban forestry program. Under the new shade tree
disease control ordinance, procedures for eradicating shade tree diseases have been
streamlined and the City Foresters authority redefined. The maintenance of private
property section was improved with a new policy requiring turf establishment on newly
developed properties along with requirements for timely erosion control. With regard to
tree contractor licensing, new provisions were set up requiring contractors to obtain
adequate public liability insurance, workers compensation insurance, and city certification
before working on private property.
S4
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 3.
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING
Two significant additions were made to the city ordinance pertaining to the planting and
maintenance of trees within street right-of-way. It should be noted that prior to the
adoption of the new ordinance in 1990, the planting of trees within street right-of-way was
strictly prohibited. Under the new post-development landscape ordinance residents are now
permitted to plant trees within public right-of-way areas after they have obtained a tree
planting permit from the Eagan City Forester. The permit itself contains four individual
elements addressing permit procedures, long-term planting and maintenance responsibilities,
tips for planting and maintaining boulevard trees, and the official permit itself. A copy of
an example permit has been included with this report, for the Commission's information.
Also included, is a copy of the current planting standards for landscaping within right-of-way
areas as defined in the new city ordinance. As the Commission will note, there are specific
setback and spacing requirements which must be met before a permit is issued. In addition
to these requirements the City Forester may use his own discretion in determining which
species of trees may be appropriate for a particular segment of roadway or neighborhood
street. Since the permit procedure was first established in July 1990, 12 permits have been
approved by the City Forester for boulevard landscaping.
The second significant addition to the city ordinance authorized the City Council to establish
and implement a comprehensive master street tree planting program in the community. To
that end, a boulevard technician was hired by the Forestry Department in September 1990
to develop a feasibility study for the master street tree program. The effort began with an
on-site inspection of more than 84 miles of boulevard and included measurement of
available green space, trail width, total right-of-way width, and the presence of utility service
lines. By the conclusion of the study, it became readily apparent that the most limiting
factors to the development of a comprehensive boulevard landscaping program was a
combination of horizontal setback requirements coupled with a maze of underground
utilities within the boulevard right-of-way areas. The study revealed that only about 4.0
miles or 4.8% of the 84 miles of boulevard surveyed could accommodate the planting of
boulevard trees in accordance with the city ordinance standards.
In light of this finding, the Forestry Division also studied the extent to which changes in the
setback requirements would increase the amount of plantable mileage. That study
determined that reducing the current setback requirement from 10 feet, to a less restrictive
six feet, would result in only an additional nine percent of plantable mileage. Consequently,
the feasibility study concluded that it would not likely be possible to develop a functional
and cohesive master tree street planting program, in Eagan.
The results of this study were presented to the Advisory Park, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission at their meeting on November 7, 1991. It was the Commission's
recommendation that short term efforts be focused on the development of a boulevard
~-S•
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 4.
landscaping plan along Wescott Road between Pilot Knob Road and Lexington Avenue in
conjunction with an overall landscaping program for the Municipal Center/Library Campus.
In addition, the Commission recommended that the city approach Dakota County to explore
opportunities for landscaping along those segments of county road proposed for future
upgrading and expansion.
DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE
As noted earlier, the Parks and Recreation Commission has previously endorsed and
recommended to the City Council a series of proposed revisions to the city's subdivision
regulations and land use (zoning) regulations. The proposed revisions brought together a
number of "model ordinances" which had been collected from other communities and
analyzed by the city's interdepartmental landscape "committee" at some length.
Under the city's land use regulations a number of new requirements were being proposed.
These included:
• Minimum planting sizes for deciduous and coniferous trees, and shrubs
• Landscaping budgets equivalent to 2 1/2 percent of the cost of the value of proposed
buildings, but not less than $15,000 per development
• Planting islands occupying at least five percent of parking areas
• Reforestation and/or native landscape restoration on all slopes and berms
• Preservation of woodland areas, i.e. prohibition of clear cutting of woodland areas
and caliper inch per caliper inch replacement for shade trees greater than eight
inches diameter
• Regulation of private irrigation systems within public right-of-way
• Establishment of buffers and vegetative and screening between land use zones, and
around all parking, loading, utility and storage areas
• Protection of large trees within new construction areas (e.g. no excavation or other
sub-surface disturbance within the drip line of any tree eight inches in diameter or
more)
A copy of the proposed development landscape ordinance revisions - as approved by the
Commission at their May 3, 1990 meeting - are attached for the Commission's reference.
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 5.
Despite the fact that the Parks and Recreation Commission and Advisory Planning
Commission had approved the proposed sub-division and zoning landscape ordinance
changes nearly two years ago, this item has not yet been forwarded to the City Council for
official action. The Community Development division had requested that the master street
tree planting plan be finalized before the new zoning regulations were put into place. The
specific reason for this was that the proposed zoning regulations specifically required
developers to install boulevard landscaping along streets abutting new subdivisions (where
called for in the street tree plan). While this was just one of a host of proposed additions
to the zoning requirements, the Community Development Department felt it important
enough to delay the approval process through the City Council.
With the master street tree program feasibility study now completed, it is evident that the
requirement for boulevard landscaping as a part of new subdivision development, is no
longer a relevant issue. Accordingly, staff have advised the Community Development
Department of the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation to not proceed with
a master street tree planting program at this time. Staff have further urged that the
Community Development Department make the appropriate revisions to the zoning
requirements - as it pertains to the master street tree program - and that the proposed
landscape regulations be brought back to the City Council for final conclusion.
SUMMARY
In summary, the Parks and Recreation Department has been actively implementing the post-
development landscape regulations adopted by the Commission and City Council in 1990.
The Commission has reviewed and concluded that a comprehensive master street tree
planting program is not a viable option at this time. In the interim the City Forestry
Division will continue to review and authorize individual permit applications for planting
within right-of-way areas, on a case by case basis.
With regard to the subdivision and zoning landscape ordinances the City Council has not
yet adopted the revisions approved by the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation
Commission in 1990. With a few minor changes the ordinance could be ready for Council
action; but this will require the initiative of the Community Development Division who
oversees subdivision and zoning regulations.
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 6.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
This memorandum is intended for informational purposes only and no specific action is
required. owever, the Commission may want to discuss it's position relative to the status
of the de opment side of the landscaping ordinance, or offer any additional comments or
suggesti to the landscaping ordinances in general.
J hh VonDeLinde
uperintendent of Parks
JKV/nab
3B:aprnrc.029
s8 .
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 28, 1992
RE: 1992 GOALS & OBJECTIVES
PLANNING DIVISION
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Annually, the Commission reviews and makes recommendation regarding the Planning
Division's tasks for the upcoming year. Utilizing the Commission recommendations for task
prioritization, staff is better able to respond to public needs by optimizing the use of
available resources. The attached "goals and objectives outline" indicates staff's "best shot"
in task prioritization. This outline also lists additional tasks which are not prioritized.
These unprioritized tasks are provided to the Commission for their evaluation and possible
reprioritization. Many of these tasks are "carry over" projects identified in previous years
but are now moving up the list of priorities as other projects are completed.
The scope of projects include the development of the first phase components for Blackhawk
Community Park. This project alone is significantly large in scope and importance. Obvious
by this outline, the Planning Division's development tasks are not being reduced in scale
based on the 30 parks built since 1987. The scope has changed from first phase construction
to facility development. As the outline portrays the "facility needs pallete" exceeds the
resources available within the 1992 timeframe.
The second category of tasks deals with Parks System Planning Tasks. These projects are
typically inventory or study oriented and pertain to the overall park system.
The last category lists development review tasks. These tasks are primarily the review of
preliminary plats and the responsibility in regards to parks dedication, trails dedication and
resource preservation.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission needs to evaluate these 1992 Planning Division goals and make
recommendations regarding their priority and scope.
SS/nh
1
1992 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
PLANNING DIVISION
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
JANUARY 28, 1992
PARKS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT *Indicates priority task/project for 1992
PRIMARY TASK/GOAL RESPONSIBILITIES PARK
A. Construct Blackhawk Community Park and 1st Design, construction documents, construction Blackhawk
phase facilities administration & management
B. Final acceptance of I. C. 90-1 Construction administration and management Wescott Station
Carlson Lake
Burr Oaks
Trapp Farm
Bridle Ridge *
Captain Dodd
Woodhaven
C. Installation of Playground Equipment and Support Design and installation supervision Trapp Farm *
Facilities Wescott Park *
Captain Dodd *
Burr Oaks N
Burr Oaks S
Blackhawk
D. Implementation of Landscaping/Reforestation Design and installation supervision Wescott Station
Maintenance Building
Northview Tennis
Downing (buffer)
Municipal Center P-lot
O'Leary (North) *
Captain Dodd
Burr Oaks (South)
Burr Oaks (North)
Downing
Heine Pond
South Oaks
Library
Well Site
2
E. Installation of foundation plantings adjacent to park Design and installation supervision Ohmann
buildings Rahn *
Sky Hill
Goat Hill
Northview (West)
Evergreen
Thomas Lake (Wellhouse)
Carnelian
Clearwater
F. Implement 1992 Bituminous Maintenance Color Inventory, Assessment, Construction Carnelian HC
Coat Project Documents, Construction Administration and Cinnamon Ridge HC
Management Country Home HC
Evergreen HC
Kettle HC
Lakeside HC
*priority will be based on on-site Meadowlands HC
facility assessment Ohmann HC
O'Leary HC/TC
Rahn HC/TC
Ridgecliff TC
Sky Hill HC/TC
South Oaks HC
Walnut Hill HC
HC-Hard Court
Play Area
TC-Tennis Court
G. Implementation of Trailways Design, Construction, Administration & Lakeside/Hackmore Dr *
Management Highline/Walnut Hill
to Trapp Farm
Wandering Walk
Thomas Lake (prairie)
Municipal Ctr.Corridor
Ridgecliff
Downing Park
Bridle Ridge
H. Implementation of Pedestrian Bridge Analysis, Specifications, Bid Administration, Blackhawk Park *
Construction, Administration and
Management
1. Implement Improvement Contract for Relocation of Design, Construction Document, Northview Elementary
Backstops & Ballfield Fencing Administration and Management School
3
J. Bituminous Improvement Adjacent to Concession Design, Construction Documents, Northview *
Building Administration and Management
K. Installation of Information Kiosk Design, Construction Documents and Thomas Lake Park
Supervision Trapp Farm Park *
L. Construct Hardcourts/Play Areas Needs Assessment, Construction Documents, Ridgcliff
Administration and Management Rahn
M. Construct Pavilion/Shelter Building Programming, Design Evaluation, Blackhawk
Construction Administration and
Management
N. Construct Sun Shelter Buildings by Contractual or Analysis, Layout and Supervision Slater Acres
City Forces Northview
Heine Pond
Trapp Farm
Kettle Park
0. Construct Warming Shelter Building by City Forces Analysis, Layout and Construction Ridgecliff
Supervision Lexington
NI Pilot Knob
Woodhaven
P. Implementation of Miscellaneous Projects For Plaza Design and Supervise Installation Wescott Station
Areas, Dock Deck, Observation Deck, Boardwalks, Sky Hill
Bridges Meadowlands
O'Leary
Pilot Knob
Blackhawk
Highline Trail Corridor
Heine Pond
Berry Patch
Q. Installation of Horseshoe Courts Analysis, Design and Supervise Construction Trapp Farm
Rahn Park
Meadowlands
Carnelian
4
R. Implementation of Athletic Lighting, Project Analysis, Design, Construction Documents, Northview (softball)
Construction Administration and Ohmann (soccer)
Management Rahn (hockey/free
skate)
Carnelian (hockey/free
skate)
Lexington (hockey/free
skate)
S. Implementation of Parking Lot Lighting Contract Design, Construction Documents, Northview
Administration and Management
T. Installation of Soccer Bankboard Design and Supervise Construction Carnelian
U. Installation of Grills, Benches, Waste Receptacles Design and Layout Miscellaneous Park Sites
II. PARKS SYSTEM PLANNING
PRIMARY TASK/GOAL RESPONSIBILITY PARK *
A. Masterplanning Inventory, Analysis, Concept and Lexington/Diffley site
Schematic Design Patrick Eagan
Walden Heights
Peridot Path
Northview (picnic area)
Wandering Walk
Mueller (Passive area)
Ravine Park
Moonshine
Thomas Lake (East)
Rahn (central woods)
B. Update Parks System Plan Assist Director, Commission and Staff Eagan Park System
C. Update Comprehensive Trails System Plan Inventory, Assist Director, Analysis, Plan City of Eagan
and Map Development and Revisions
D. Update Existing Trail System Graphic Inventory and Graphic Revision City of Eagan
E. Update as-built drawings of post bond Inventory and graphics development 30 park sites
referendum parks
5
F. Update as-built drawings of pre-bond Inventory and graphics development 10 park sites
referendum parks
G. Implementation of Comprehensive Signage Inventory, Analysis, Program Eagan Parks System
Program Development, Implementation
Sand Volleyball Site Study Inventory, Analysis, Site Alternatives City of Eagan *
1. Drinking Fountain Needs Study Inventory, Analysis, Recommendations Eagan Parks System
J. Parking Study Inventory Analysis Recommendations Rahn (Athletic)
Rahn (Tennis/Shelter)
Lexington
III. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PRIMARY TASK GOAL RESPONSIBILITIES PRIORITY
A. Parkland Dedication Administration Assist Director, Analysis, Policy Interpretation,
Recommendation to APRNRC
B. Trails Dedication Administration Assist Director, Analysis, Policy, Interpretation,
.A' Recommendation to APRNRC
C. Tree Preservation and Resource Administration Assist Director, Analysis, Policy Interpretation,
Recommendation to APRNRC
D. Development Contract Administration Author APRNRC adopted recommendation into *
development contracts
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON WATER QUALITY BROCHURES
Attached for the Commission's information is the text and layout for the two water quality
brochures mentioned by John Vondelinde at the January Commission meeting. The large
brochure is intended to take a "different" tact in attracting the attention of residents
regarding basic information on water quality, such as the role of phosphorus in lake water
quality degradation, and the connection between storm sewers and lakes. The small
brochure is intended to be used as a tear out reference to provide guidance on "lake-
friendly" lawn care and other practices. Both will be sent out as tip-ins to the City
newsletter in the spring.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
RB/cm
Attachments
27wp:advpark3.029
COS'
Eagan is
Naturally Rich
in Lakes and Wetlands
However, "Lake Bandits" are Now Robbing
Eagan's Lakes and Ponds of their Health
(o(o•
Just who are these
"Lake Bandits?"
urprisingly, they're folks just like
you and me. And they don't realize what
they're doing is harming Eagan's lakes, ponds,
and wetlands. In fact, we found that most
residents and businesses simply don't
recognize the impact of grass clippings, leaves,
or improperly applied fertilizers on the health
of Eagan's lakes and ponds.
FIRST WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW WE CAN LOSE
OUR LAKES AND PONDS IN EAGAN
Phosphorus is the Culprit. The Storm Sewer Connection.
High levels of phosphorus mean a sick lake where game- "What goes in does come out." Unlike the City's
fish die during the winter, and excessive weeds and mats sanitary sewer system that carries away household waste
of algae can foul the water for boaters, canoeists, water, there are no treatment plants to remove
swimmers, and lake-shore residents. It also means that our pollutants from water in a city's storm sewer system.
kes fill in with dead vegetation faster than they should.
[ere are some of the materials in an urban environment When phosphorus-containing materials are washed by
that contain phosphorus and other pollutants: rainfall or blown into our neighborhood streets,
driveways, or parking lots, they quickly flow into the
• Grass Clippings • Leaves nearest storm water drain along the street. Then these
• Fertilizers • Topsoil Erosion pollutants are carried through the underground pipes
• Chemicals • Pet Wastes of the storm sewer system into our lakes and ponds.
• Motor Oil • Paints & Solvents And phosphorus, "the unwanted culprit," becomes
• Soaps & Detergents fuel for the growth of unwanted weeds and algae.
1 Q
a
I
415
"It's amazing, but just one pound of phosphorus can grow 500 pounds of agae in our lakes and ponds."
"I'm deputizing you to help protect
Eagan's lakes and wetlands."
Doesn't blow grass clippings and Uses phosphorus free detergents for
leaves into the street. washing car in driveway.
0
RICH BRASCH.
Water Resources Coordinator,
City of Eagan. D-7/<
With over 10 years of water
resources experience, Rich 0
Braseh joined Eagan -s City
Staff in December, 1990 after
several water management
efforts in the State of Montana.
He holds a Master's Degree in
Water Resources Management
from the University of
Wisconsin at Madison. Convinced parents to keep fertilizer off the
driveway and sidmalks. Reminds his father not to dispose of oil
or paint in the street orgutter.
HERE'S HOW YOU CAN HELP ENSURE THE
WATER QUALITY IN OVER 375 WETLANDS IN EAGAN
Because City staff resources are limited, we'd like you to become an "Honorary Water Quality Deputy" too. And, it's
easy for residents and businesses to help improve the quality of Eagan's lakes and ponds.
Keep grass clippings, leaves, pet
wastes, and fertilizers off your Whether you use a
sidewalks, driveways, and streets - so commercial service or
they don't wash into the storm sewer do your own lawn care,
drain and into our lakes. make sure you use low
a << a Tor no phosphorus
fertilizers. And go easy
. ! y- i} • on fertilizers and pesticides because
lha l r; rain can wash chemicals off lawns and
carry them into lakes and streams.
Don't locate compost piles near a
Don't dispose of car oil, pesticides, shoreline because decaying grass
paints, solvents, or other clippings and leaves will increase
household chemicals into the phosphorus levels in ponds. And,
street, gutter, or on your unlandscaped property should be lawn because they'll stabilized through seeding or
eventually be carried sodding to prevent topsoil erosion -
to our lakes. into the storm sewer system and
into our lakes.
Facts about Eagan's lakes
• There are 375 lakes, ponds, and wetlands larger than one acre in Eagan.
• Over 80% of these lakes and ponds receive pollutant runoff from the City's storm sewer system.
Fish Lake is the deepest lake in Eagan with a maximum depth of 33 feet.
• Thomas Lake is the largest lake, covering almost 44 acres.
• Fish, Carlson, and Schwanz Lakes are stocked with largemouth bass and panfish by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
• Heine Pond has a naturally reproducing population of bass and bluegills.
• Poor in-lake water quality has contributed to numerous fish kills in Eagan's lakes during the past several years.
• Schwanz Lake in Trapp Farm Park receives eight times as much phosphorus today as it did before the area was developed
residentially.
• Just one pound of phosphorus can result in the growth of up to 500 pounds of algae.
• The City has prioritized water quality efforts for Schwanz, Fish, Heine, Blackhawk, LeMay, and Thomas Lakes - yet only Heine
Pond meets water quality standards today.
ONE OF THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL
WATER QUALITY PLANS IN THE ENTIRE STATE
Listening to the concerns of Eagan residents, the City Council formed a Task Force in 1987 to begin a hard look at water
quality. The result was a Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan that puts Eagan at the forefront of an
environmental issue that other cities in the metro area may have to face in the next few years. The key to reaching the
goals of the plan is this: by controlling the quality of water runoff, Eagan and its residents can improve the quality of over
375 lakes and ponds. Here are some of the actions called for in the plan:
• Working with developers to include water quality protection features in new developments
• Public education for adults and children
• More frequent street sweeping
• Use of low and no phosphorus fertilizer for City parks and other City property
• Expanded storm sewer system maintenance and improvement
• Lake restoration
• Long-term water quality sampling for lakes and runoff
The City would like to answer your questions. Call us at 681-4300.
Thomas Fgan, Mayor
Council Members:
Pat Awada
Pamela McCrea
Timothy Pawlenty
Theodore Wachter
Thomas Hedges, City Administrator
Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works
Kenneth Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation
john VonDeLinde, Superintendent of Parks
Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator
•
city of eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road • Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 • 612-681-4600 Printed on Recycled Paper
prevent soil runoff directly into lakes or ponds.
• Don't locate compost site near lakes. To prevent
leaching into lakes, avoid depositing leaves and
grass clippings adjacent to or in lakes and ponds. A Program of the
Eagan Environm nt
Please place this checklist on refrigerator or Quail n' Cam~z'
workbench, or in your garage.
.tea
The Benefits of Supporting Eagan's Water
Quality Management Plan: A Water
1. Cleaner water for swimming, fishing, boating,
canoeing, and aesthetic enjoyment. Checklist for ' r ~
2. Better habitat for gamefish and wildlife.
~
3. Preservation of Eagan's scenic beauty. bIle & (X , Yard
4. Protection of investments in property by residents,
zA
business, and government.
I'r
We'd like to hear your ideas or answer any
questions you may have about Eagan's Water
Quality Program, so please call us at 681-4300.
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
city of aagan
3501 Coachman Point • Eagan, Minnesota 55122
® Printed on recycled paper.
O.
Just One Pound of Phosphorus • Leave grass height at 2 to 2.1/2 inches. Your lawn
will withstand heat stress better, need less watering,
Entering the Storm Sewer System and discourage growth of dandelions and other
Can Grow 500 Pounds of Algae weeds when left longer.
• Quickly sod or seed on new construction sites. By
in our Lakes. stabilizing these sites immediately, erosion control
measures prevent sediment from entering lakes.
With the support of environmentally-conscious
residents like you, the City has developed an
Environmental Quality Program to improve the health HOUSEHOLD
of Eagan's most important lakes and ponds. The main CHEMICALS &
strategy focuses on controlling the amount of DISPOSAL:
phosphorus entering our lakes through the City's storm
sewer system. • Properly dispose of car
oil, paints, and pesticides.
A Checklist for Residents and Businesses: Don't dump motor oil, paints, solvents, pesticides,
LAWN & GARDEN: your other pollutants into the street or gutter, or on
• Use low phosphorus • Use phosphorus-free soaps when washing can.
fertilizers. Be sure to To reduce the amount of phosphorus entering the
select a lawn and garden storm sewer system from your driveway and street,
fertilizer with a wash your car with phosphorus-free detergents.
^-I*" - 4-M.W , phosphorus content of • Use pesticides and weed killers sparingly.
<VO, 3% or less (it appears on Chemicals in runoff can be reduced by "spot
outside of bag).
spraying" problem areas, rather than treating your
• Keep fertilizer spray or pellets off pavement entire lawn.
Rain or lawn sprinkling will wash fertilizer off
driveway or sidewalks and into the storm sewer.
• Keep lawn clippings and leaves off streets. By •~'~*r EXTRA CARE
directing the discharge chute on your mower toward NEEDED BY LAKE
the lawn's interior, you'll avoid blowing clippings
into the street and storm sewer system. SHORE OWNERS:
• Don't fertilize before a heavy rain. Intense rain i _ • Leave natural "buffer"
can wash fertilizer off your yard and into the storm at edge of lakes. A 10 to
sewer system. 20 foot wide strip of taller grass and plants will act
• Don't use a grass catcher when mowing. as a buffer to absorb nutrient runoff before it reaches
Research shows that grass clippings left on your the pond.
lawn are equal to one fertilizer application per year • Establish turfgrass on new construction. Quickly
(and it's natural and free). sod, seed, or landscape on new construction sites to
7/
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1992
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO BEGIN CATCH BASIN STENCILING EFFORT
Introduction
The City's Water Quality Management Program places a strong emphasis on public
education aimed at informing residents, City staff, businesses, and others about how to
modify lawn care and other practices to minimize impacts to lake water quality. A crucial
element in this education effort is teaching these audiences about the connection between
the City's lakes and the storm sewer system that feeds them, a connection many simply do
not recognize. Recognition of this relationship is especially important in the immediate
drainage area of a lake where pollutants that enter the storm sewer system are carried
directly to the lake without being routed through intermediate ponds to provide
opportunities for settling.
Proposal
To provide a constant, visible reminder of the connection between the lakes and the storm
sewer system in the City, we are proposing the initiation of an effort to paint informative
stencils near catch basins in priority drainages. A stencil prototype is attached.
Areas targeted for the effort in 1992 would be the direct drainage areas of all six Class I
lakes, as well as seven of the fourteen Class II lakes identified in the City's Water Quality
Management Plan. The areas covered by the stenciling effort are similar to the areas
targeted for intensified street sweeping by City maintenance crews.
Staff estimates that these areas contain a total of 1,100 catch basins, and approximately 400
person hours would be required to stencil the catch basins. Our intent is to solicit
volunteers from the Boy Scouts and/or local civic organizations, with City staff providing
overall direction, training, and supplies (including a durable non-toxic paint for the stencil),
as well as appropriate safety equipment. This program could be expanded to other lower
priority areas in succeeding years.
1
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
JANUARY 29, 1992
PAGE 2.
Commission Action Requested
Comments by the Commission on this proposal are welcome. This proposal should be
approved by the City Council and would probably be placed on the Council agenda for late
February or early March. If the Commission supports the proposal, it would be desirable
for it to pass that recommendation along to the City Council in the form of an adopted
motion.
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
RB/cm
Attachment
2
KEEP POLLUTANTS OUT
DRAINS TO LAKE
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCE COORDINATOR
DATE: DECEMBER 11, 1991
SUBJECT: BRIEFING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991
I. Introduction
The Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 was passed by the most recent
session of the state legislature. The Minnesota Board of Soil and
Water Resources (BWSR) has been assigned the responsibility of
administering the Act at the state level. However, the Act
mandates a strong role by cities, counties and watershed management
organizations (WMOs) in the administration of its regulatory
elements.
The regulatory provisions of the Act take place in two phases. The
first phase is an interim program that begins on January 1, 1992
and lasts until July 1, 1993. The permanent program takes effect
on July 1, 1993.
The following is a summary of the major provisions of the
regulatory part of the program and their major implications for the
City of Eagan.
II. Background
A. Intent of 1991 Act
The basic intent of the Act is to recognize and protect the
public benefits of wetlands with regard to water quality
treatment, floodwater retention, public recreation, fish and
wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge, and potential
commercial uses. It does this by emphasizing the preservation
and-where significant impacts are unavoidable-replacement of
existing wetlands. In general, the Act sets up a program
designed to act as a "safety net" for wetlands not actively
regulated under the authority of either the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or the federal Corps.of
Engineers (COE).
B. Existing Jurisdictions
Currently, the DNR regulates 3 of the 8 types of wetlands. In
addition, DNR jurisdiction in urban environments extends only
1
to wetlands having a size of 2.5 acres or greater. Of the
375+ wetlands (including lakes and ponds) that have been
inventoried in Eagan, only about 60 meet both these criteria.
They are referred to as "protected", meaning DNR must
authorize any activity which modifies their cross-section
below the ordinary high water mark. Typically, these wetlands
are the "untouchables" with respect to draining and filling.
Dredging/ sediment removal and encroachment are heavily
regulated as well.
Where DNR authority covers activities that would change the
cross-section of a wetland, the Corps of Engineers regulates
only the discharge of dredge or fill materials into wetlands.
However, these COE responsibilities extend to all wetlands
regardless of size or type. Where COE and DNR jurisdictions
overlap, the regulated party must comply with all the
conditions set by each agency. There is no official minimum
size under which COE regulation ceases, but there are many
exemptions that apply to certain types of activities. Small
wetlands, especially those less than 1 acre and "isolated",
appear to merit little attention by COE with regard to
avoidance or replacement. The principle sideboard with
respect to wetlands jurisdiction by the Corps is the
relatively broad definition of a wetland which is established
in a 1987 technical manual compiled by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
C. Relation of 1991 Act to Existing Jurisdictions
The Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991 is designed to establish
additional state and local regulatory control over wetlands
that are not actively regulated by either DNR or the Corps of
Engineers. For the most part, these will be small wetlands
that may not even show up on many wetland inventories
completed in the past. In general, the Act sets up a program
that encourages avoidance of impacts to wetlands first, then
reduction of impacts to the subject wetland if avoidance is
untenable. If neither avoidance nor reduction of impacts are
reasonable, then the Act requires mitigation, often by the
replacement of a wetland with similar values. In urban
environments, 2 acres of replacement wetlands are required for
every one acre of natural wetland eliminated.
It is important to note that the Wetlands Conservation Act
uses a definition of wetlands similar to that established in
the 1987 federal technical documents. There is now
considerable debate at the federal level regarding whether to
significantly narrow the definition of a wetland for federal
regulatory purposes. If the federal definition of wetlands is
narrowed, it would shrink the number of wetlands currently
regulated by the Corps of Engineers. This would in turn
increase the number of wetlands falling through-to the "safety
2
/0•
net" established by the Act and could add substantially to the
workload of local governments in wetland regulation.
D. Exemptions Under 1991 Act
There are numerous exemptions to some requirements in the Act.
Most of those exemptions are directed toward agricultural
operations but there are some which affect urban development
as well. Perhaps the most significant is one which exempts
from the requirements of the Act any development which
received final or preliminary plat approval or conditional use
permit approval between August 1, 1986 and January 1, 1992.
Any development platted after January 1, 1992 is, however,
subject to the provisions of the Act. Another exemption
covers any activity necessary to repair and maintain public
drainage systems as long as wetlands that have been in
existence for more than 20 years are not drained.
III. Administration and Enforcement
A. The Interim Program
The interim program has several immediate requirements of
interest to the City.
First, local government units (LGU) should decide by January
1, 1992 which LGU will administer the interim program at the
local government level. One of the major functions of the
designated LGU will be to determine exemptions to the
provisions of the Act and to decide whether to approve
replacement plans for affected wetlands. This function is
important because there is a moratorium prohibiting-filling,
draining, or burning of non-exempt wetlands that begins on
January 1, 1992. Without an LGU to administer the program at
the local level, landowners will have no one to determine
exemptions or approve replacement plans. Consequently,
otherwise allowable projects under the program will not be
able to legally proceed. If an LGU is not designated by
January 1, 1992, the blanket moratorium will effectively exist
until one is designated and begins functioning.
Second, the Act requires that community peace officers assist
the Department of Natural Resources in enforcing the
provisions of the Act. The details of this enforcement role
have not yet been worked out but probably represent at least
a slight change in the traditional role of local law
enforcement officials.
Finally, the Board of Soil and Water Resources has just
released a set of proposed guidelines for the interim program
3
under the Act. Comments are due to BWSR no later than
December 18, 1991. Staff are currently reviewing the proposed
rules for possible comment.
B. The Permanent Program
During the interim program, BWSR will be working on developing
and adopting guidelines for the permanent program. It is not
yet clear to what degree the permanent program will differ
significantly from the interim program. However, one
difference is apparent already. While soil and water
conservation districts or any other local government unit with
permitting authority can administer the interim provisions,
only cities, townships, and watershed management organizations
can administer the permanent program in the Metro area. Thus,
it makes some sense to give responsibility for administering
the interim program to the same local government unit that
will ultimately administer the permanent program.
IV. Major issues
There are at least two issues of immediate concern to the City
regarding the administration of this program.
First, we need to decide who the responsible LGU should be for
administration of the interim program. At the November meeting of
the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization, there was some
discussion of whether the WMO was the appropriate LGU and of the
merits of delegating authority to member cities for administration
of the program within their jurisdictions. Such an arrangement
would be acceptable for administration of the permanent program.
Action on this item was postponed pending the outcome of a review
of the program requirements by the WMO's attorney and will be taken
up at the next meeting currently scheduled for January 23, 1992.
Second, we will soon need to further define the process and the
roles of the various participants in administering the program.
The interim program guidelines and the statute deal with this to
some degree. Yet there remain many questions important to the
operation of the program, including the decision making roles of
the entities involved, the roles of the LGU, developers and others
in gathering information to make decisions, expected timelines for
processing wetland alteration requests, whether a wetland banking
system should be set up to facilitate replacement, how best to
inform developers of their responsibilities under the Act, and
others. The interim program rules that will soon be completed by
BWSR and a series of workshops scheduled for January and February,
1992 will provide additional guidance with regard to some of these
questions, but many will have to be answered by the LGU's
themselves.
4
00.
V. Conclusions
The Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991 is considerably more
expansive and detailed than I've outlined here. This memo is just
an attempt to identify a few of the major aspects of the regulatory
part of the legislation that will affect the City. Additional
discussion-both in-house and with other agencies and outside
parties-is still needed to assure that we thoroughly understand and
can assume our obligation under the Act. It would be helpful to
discuss with you how best to proceed in the coming weeks.
Rich Brasch
Water Resource Coordinator
RB
cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer
John Wingard, Development/Design Engineer
Jim Sturm, City Planner
Jon Hohenstein, Assistant to the City Administrator
Steve Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Park Planner
Gun Club WMO Board Members
0064:wetlands
5 5~.
MEMORANDUM
TO: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
FROM: PAULA NOWARIAK, RECREATION SUPERVISOR
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1992
RE: 1992 SUMMER PROGRAM REPORT
BACKGROUND
Following the direction from the City Council to increase program revenue, staff explored
the potential of charging a fee for the Summer in the Park (SIP) Playground Program
beginning with the Summer of 1992.
The SIP program has traditionally been offered to Eagan residents free of charge. During
the past two or three years, the question "Should Summer in the Park remain totally
subsidized by the City" was discussed many times by staff and Commission members. This
question, along with many others, were included in a random sample survey prepared by
staff and distributed to the parents of Summer in the Park participants. A copy of the
survey and results are attached.
Staff has reviewed the survey conducted during the Summer of 1991, brain-stormed creative
opportunities for program alternatives and reviewed the existing program critically. This
report presents staff's assessment and plan of action given the City Council's direction.
ISSUES
Staff explored many questions and concerns the public may have as a result in the change
in policy which would institute charging a fee for a program that traditionally has been free.
The main questions are as follows:
1. How will the fees be received by the public?
2. By charging a fee, should the program be drastically changed?
3. Will charging a fee affect the programs philosophy?
4. How will the fee affect the budget?
Y3.
ISSUES DISCUSSION
Will the public be outraged or at least minimally concerned that a fee is now being charged
for Summer In the Park? The long standing philosophy of the City has been to provide this
playground program at no cost to its citizens. Will this change result in a negative impact
such as reduced participation in the program? The answer to this issue will not be fully
known until the information is distributed to the public. Staff anticipates there will be some
resistance to the change, however, though change is not always easily accepted, it can prove
to have a positive impact. The playground survey discovered that there were respondents
who would expect highly qualified staff such as teachers if a fee where charged, others would
look for an upgrade of the program. The department already employs many certified
teachers as well as students enrolled in education, so that expectation may already be met.
Should charging a fee, require that the program be drastically changed? Staff's opinion is
that this new directive provides an opportunity to look at ways to improve the existing
program without drastically changing the basic practice of what already exists. As the
program currently stands, children ages 6-12 may attend any of the twelve SIP sites.
Morning and afternoon sites are available. Children ages 5 & 6 may choose to attend a
program just for their age group. Summer-in-the Park runs Monday - Wednesday from
either 9:00 - 11:30 A.M. or 1:00 - 4:00 P.M. On Thursdays, field trips outside of Eagan are
offered for a fee. Special events such as pizza parties, picnic in the park, are also offered
within Eagan at an additional fee. Daily activities included are games, crafts and special
event days.
Charging a fee may change the public's perception of the program. The public may expect
more, because they are paying a fee. Anticipating this presents a challenge to staff to
develop a well rounded program in addition to ensuring that participation not be denied
because of the fee. A scholarship program will continue to be available to participants who
request financial assistance. The full impact of the fee change will not be known until the
program begins.
The impact on the budget is an issue that also needs exploring; by charging a fee, will
participation in Summer in the Park (SIP) decrease? Staff's objective is to stay within the
staff and supply budgets for 1992 which are already approved. The revenue generated by
the fees would help off set some program costs, but would not set the scope of the budget.
ALTERNATIVES RESEARCHED/DISCUSSION
The change in policy has provided a window for change of focus. Staff has brain stormed
alternative ideas for changing the playground program. The following is a brief discussion
of four alternatives, their perceived strengths and weaknesses.
1. PAY BY THE DAY APPROACH:
This approach is to have a specified fee per day, allowing participants to
choose how many days they would like to attend SIP per week. Participants
would pre-register and pay the fee by a specific deadline.. The playground
survey had shown that some children attend only one or two days a week. An
equitable fee would require those who participate more frequently to bear a
greater share of the need to generate revenue.
¦ Allows more flexibility for participants to choose the number of times
per week they want to attend.
Weaknesses
¦ Administration
It would be difficult for the staff at the sites to keep track of who paid to
come each day without the benefit of rosters that were geared to daily
attendance. It would also be difficult for clerical staff, because it would create
more work in the form of increased data entry, opportunity for error and
additional time needed for clarification with the public! In addition, the
increased amount of office staff time may offset any revenue generated from
program fees.
¦ In the field, if a child arrived on a day that they didn't pay for, it would
be difficult for staff to tell that child they could not participate.
¦ Effect on traditional playground philosophy has considered the
playground program to be one of inclusion, one that provides flexibility
to a family during the summer and has resisted rigid structure. Pay by
the day has the appearance of not providing flexibility.
¦ Participants may not remember which days they paid for.
2. MAGNET APPROACH
Name four to six larger sites to be SIP locations, (instead of the twelve that
are currently being staffed.) and train staff to be craft or games specialists at
each site. An alternative would be to provide "visiting staff"who rotate from
park to park augmenting the skills of the "resident staff'.
Strengths
¦ Fewer sites to supervise
¦ Concentration of highly skilled and trained staff for creative activity
plans
des
¦ The underlying philosophy is that SIP takes place in neighborhood
parks so children can either walk or ride their bikes to the playground.
By utilizing a magnet approach, children may not live close enough to
walk or bike. This would result in parents driving their children to a
site or children not being able to participate due to lack of
transportation.
¦ A long bike or walk to a park site may become a dangerous situation
if they have to cross many streets or intersections to get there.
¦ Part of the philosophy of the program is to provide activities and
opportunities for all youth. The magnet approach may take away these
opportunities for some families.
¦ The change in numbers of sites could create the perception of a total
change in the SIP program. The public may perceive that they are
getting less than when the program was free.
3. SPLIT SESSION/CAMP APPROACH
For the first three weeks run a free program as in the past; the following four
weeks, run a series of camps for a fee.
trengtis
¦ This approach could accommodate families that may not be willing to
pay a fee. Shortening the free program to three weeks would mean
that only 40% of summer youth playground activity would be
subsidized.
¦ The camp approach is similar to what is currently offered. Baseball,
Softball, Sports and Games, Safety Camp, Nature Camp and Camp
Creative make up the current offerings. What would be diverse would
be the addition of more camps to augment what is already offered.
Weakness
¦ Camp opportunities usually based on one activity may be boring for
some children. Staff knows from past experience, that children have
short attention spans which result in a need to change activities often.
¦ Staffing would be difficult under the camp scenario. Currently,
registrations need to reach a predetermined number in order for a
camp to be held. Under the camp scenario, summer staff would not
be guaranteed their hours for the entire seven weeks. This might
result in summer staff not willing to commit to working for the
department.
¦ Camp fees are typically higher, because they run for a longer duration
of time. The fee may take away the opportunity for some children to
participate.
PROGRAMS SIMILAR TO THE PAST/CHARGE A FEE
Staff, during brainstorming sessions, recognized the considerable strengths of the program
as it exists. Areas where changes can be made to further enhance the SIP Program have
been identified as follows:
1. Charge a basic fee of $10.00 per participant. The program would run Monday
through Thursday for seven weeks. Two or three afternoon field trips outside
of Eagan could be offered at an additional fee. On the weeks a field trip
outside of Eagan is offered, two sites would remain open (1/4 of the sites) for
children who do not attend the field trips.
2. Two special events could also be offered at a nominal fee for children to
participate in their neighborhood park. No buses would be needed, thus
keeping the cost low. The children could help select their park's special
event.
3. Activities of an All Park nature such as the Picnic in the Park at Trapp Farm
will not provide the alternative of two sites remaining open.
Strengths
¦ Families can continue to count on seven (7) weeks of programmed
activities.
¦ Staffing would continue to be of a "duration" nature, rather than tied
to registration numbers.
¦ Enhancements to the program will be easily identifiable.
¦ Easier to participate.
¦ No change for clerical staff.
~?szass
¦ Less staff available for field trips.
¦ Supervisory staff are spread thin.
STAFF RECOMMENDS
After exploring the issues that derived from staffs brain-storming session, the
recommendation of staff is to leave the SIP program in its current format with twelve sites
and charge $10.00 per child. The program fee will be re-evaluated for 1993 with a potential
increase to $15.00.
1. This approach in staffs opinion, provides the most complete opportunities for
the youth of Eagan. By keeping the traditional format, the department can
continue to run a successful program with minor program changes. As a
result, the original philosophy of providing activities in neighborhoods can
remain intact.
2. Charging $10.00 per child will create revenue to help offset the expense of the
SIP program. Scholarships would continue to be available.
3. By opening two sites on field trip days, the City is giving participants an
alternative to attending field trips.
4. Camps will be offered during the first two weeks in August as in the past.
5. The fee is comparable to Fitness and Fun, Imagine That, Eaganettes, T-Ball,
and Tiny Tots, which are instructional programs with limited registrations.
0 7.
CONCLUSION
The Summer in the Park program was designed to provide activities for the youth of Eagan.
SIP channels the energies of children into positive ways. The philosophy of the program
does not need to change, because the City is instituting a fee. Instead, the program can
receive a fresh new look, while keeping the format that has proven to be successful.
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE
COMMISSION
DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
FROM: DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1991
RE: PRELIMINARY REPORT: SUMMER PLAYGROUND SURVEY
BACKGROUND
During the coarse of discussion, following recreation reports on summer programs at
Commission meetings for the past two or three years, questions have arisen. "Is there a
need for a day long playground program?" Summer in the Park is publicized as, and
Department policy is, that the activity is a drop in program, i.e., attendance is not mandatory
and it is permissible for children to leave prior to the end of a days activity: "Is this practice
appropriate?" Additionally with budgets becoming resource scarce, the question arises:
"Should the Summer In The Park Program remain totally subsidized by the City?"
With these questions (and many more) in mind a survey questionnaire was prepared by staff;
copy is attached. A random sample of 228 parents of Summer In the Park participants was
selected (20% of 1,141). It was anticipated that a minimum return of 40% would provide
a representative study sample. Questionnaires were mailed to home addresses, anonymity
was guaranteed and surveys could be returned to the playground, via the Municipal Center
drop box or by mail. Participation was voluntary.
The Department achieved a 28% return; 63 completed surveys. A second, follow-up mailing
may have increased the percentage of return, however, no coding was used to enable a
second mailing to be sent to only those who had not already responded.
Survey Questionnaire:
The questionnaire is comprised of two types of inquiries. Items 1, 2, 3, 14, 15 and 16 are
value free, that is, opinion, perception, belief, frame of mind will not change how many years
your family has participated in Summer In The Park, the number of children currently in a
family or their ages, how. far you live from your park, how long you have lived in Eagan or
your prior experience with other playground programs.
07•
2
Items 4 through 13, however, provide opportunity for opinions to surface, perceptions to be
captured and inputs for answers to questions are gleaned.
For purposes of analysis, cross tabulations of value free and opinion variables can be made.
It should be noted that for this report tabulations have been made without access to
computer statistical software.
This report is labeled as preliminary as staff has only begun to apply tabulations. The
possible combinations are numerous. Variables that hold potential bearing to the three
questions posed at the beginning of this report are presented here.
Cross Tabulations:
Crosstabs produce a contingency table that: lists each variable, the frequency of cases for
each value of each variable and the number of cares for each intersection of a variable pair.
This data is expressed as a row frequency number and as percentages by row and column.
The reader can easily visualize where the weight of the data is loading.
Typically, a statistical measure such as chi square is applied to the data to determine
statistical significance which would enable one to determine whether results can be
generalized to the entire population under study. To appropriately use chi square, however,
frequencies of more than 5 per call are required to produce statistical significance. The data
produced by this study cannot be analyzed using chi square. Use of alternate more
sophisticated analysis is prohibited using a hand held calculator!
To read a Crosstab: Each cell provides:
1. The frequency of responses matching the variables listed across the top and at the left
side of the table.
2. The percentage of all responses in each row (read across).
3. The percentage of all responses in each column (read down).
Summary data:
Row total is the total of all frequencies in that row. It is also expressed as a percentage of
all responses. This appears to the right of the "box". Column totals appear at the bottom
of the chart. They too are expressed in frequencies and as percentage of all responses.
General rule of thumb: Small frequencies can produce high percentages that can be
misleading!
7d•
3
Presentation of Data: Issues
¦ In your opinion, is there a need for a day long playground program? Cross
tabulation with: How far do you live from the park at which your children participate
in Summer In The Park?
CROSS TABULATION - Need for day long program/How far do you live from the Park?
Count Less than 1/2 - I mile 1 -3 miles More than Row
Row % 1/2 mile 3 miles Total
Column %
5 3 3 1 12
Yes 42% 25% 25% 8% 19%
20% 15% 20% 33%
No 18 17 12 2 49
37% 35% 24% 4% 78%
72% 85% 80% 67%
NA 2 2
100% 0 0 0 3%
8%
Column 25 20 15 3 63
Total 40% 32%. 23% 5% 100%
Distances from the park create the data in columns, down. Yes and No responses appear
in rows read across. NA refers to "no answer".
Analysis:
1. 72% of the respondents live 1 mile or less from the park.
2. 78% of all respondents are of the opinion that a day long playground program is not
needed.
3. None of the "cells" in the yes row meet the criteria of more than 5 to be capable of
statistical significance.
4. This cross tabulation demonstrates that the distance the family lives from the park
does not influence the perceived need for a day long program as each column's "No"
responses out number the "Yes" column.
5. It should not be dismissed however, that 19% of the survey respondents are of the
opinion that a day long playground program is needed.
y1'.
4
Continuing to pursue the question - Is there a need for a day long program, the
variable "How many children do you have enrolled in the program? was analyzed.
CROSS TABULATION - Need for a day long program/Number of Children
Count 1 Child 2 Children 3 Children Row Total
Row%
Column %
4 8 0 12
Yes 33% 67% 0 19%
18% 25% 0
No 16 24 9 49
33% 49% 18% 78%
73% 75% 100%
NA 2 0 0 2.
9% 0 0 3%
Column 22 32 9 63
Total 35% 51% 14% 100%
Analysis:
1. Cross tabulation by number of children, as expected, produces the same row totals as
before.
2. The columnar totals present a changed profile of the survey respondents; two children
families are most prevalent in the sample (no families of 4 children were found among
the returned surveys).
3. The respondents who have three children did not perceive a need for a day long
playground program.
4. 25% of respondents with two children, though only 8 in number, representing 13% of
all respondents - are of the opinion that a day long program is needed.
5. The overall bias exposed by this Crosstab is that a day long program, in the
respondents opinion, is not needed..
6. The number of children in a family does not appear to be a factor in the overall
opinion of the respondents that a need does not exist for a day long playground
program.
pia.
5
Further analysis is called for; perhaps the age of the children will clarify the issue. What are
the ages of your children who participate in the program?
CROSS TABULATION Need for a Day Long Program/Age of Child #1
Count 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Row Total
Row%
Column %
7 2 3 0 12
Yes 58% 17% 25% 19% .
29% 10% 25%
No 16 17 9 7 49
33% 35% 18% 14% 78%
67% 85% 75% 100%
NA 1 1 0 0 2
50% 50% 3%
4% 5%
Column 24 20 12 7 63
Total 38% 32% 19% 11% 100%
CROSS TABULATION Need for day long program/Age of Child #2
Count 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Row Total
Row%
Column %
3 2 4 0 9
Yes 33% 22% 44% 21%
21% 13% 31%
No 11 13 9 0 33
33.5% 39.5% 27% 79%
79% 87% 69%
NA 0 0 0 0 0
Column 14 15 13 0 42
Total 33% 36% 31% 100%
9~.
6
Analysis
1. First it must be pointed out that staffs assumption was that respondents would list
their oldest child as Child #1, next oldest as #2 and so on. That was not always the
case; the youngest child was listed as Child #1 by several respondents. If it matters,
and I'm not certain that it really does, that piece of consistency is lost. (And, then
there is the family of 7-8 year old triplets!).
2. The row percentages and frequencies for Child #1 cross tabulation remain the same
as for the two previous Crosstabs.
3. Support for a day long program appears primarily from the respondents for the 5 -
6 year age group.
4. The sample size is reduced to 42 when Child #2 is the focus of attention.
5. The ratio of respondents who fall into the yes/no categories remains stable when the
focus is on Child #2.
Summary
Generally speaking, the distance a family lives from the park, the number of children in the
family and the ages of child #1 and child #2 do not strongly influence the overall perception
on the part of the respondents that, despite limited evidence of support for a day long
playground program, the weight of opinion is that such a program is not needed.
¦ When your child comes to Summer in the Park at 1:00 PM (or 9:00 AM); he/she
must stay until 4:00 PM (or 1130 AM). This variable was designed to address the
drop in policy of Summer in the Park. The next several Crosstabs study this
question.
CROSS TABULATION Stay at the Park/How far live from the park
Count Less Than 1/2 - 1 Mile 1 - 3 Mile More Than Row Total
Row % 1/2 Mile 3 Miles
Column %
13 9 6 2 30
Yes 43% 30% 20% 7% 48%
52% 45% 40% 67%
Disagree 11 11 9 1 32
34% 34% 28% 4% 51%
44% 55% 60% 33%
Ambiguous 1 1
100% 0 0 0 1%
4%
Column 5 20 15 3 63
Total 2 0% 32% 23% 5% 100%
7
Analysis
1. Respondents were asked to either agree or disagree with the "stay at the park"
statement. This issue raised editorial comment from some respondents such as: "It
should be okay to leave if a parent picks up a child" or "A child leaving in the middle
would disrupt others". The ambiguous category came about when reasons agreeing
and disagreeing with the statement were both presented but a determinate opinion
was not indicated!
2. As anticipated, the study of this issue presents closely divided opinion.
3. The distance the family lives from the park demonstrates a gradual shift of opinion
among the respondents. That shift is in the opposite direction than anticipated;
respondents who live farther from the park disagree that children must stay.
4. The number of respondents in the "more than 3 mile" category is too small to suggest
a change in opinion.
5. The distance a family lives from a park does influence opinion on this variable.
A Crosstab was prepared to learn whether the number of children in a family provides a
different perspective to "staying at the park."
CROSS TABULATION Stay at the Park/Number of children
Count 1 Child 2 Children 3 Children Row Total
Row%
Column %
9 16 5 30
Agree 30% 53% 17% 48%
41% 50% 56%
13 14 4 31
Disagree 42% 45% 13% 49%
59% 44% 44%
0 2 0 2
Ambiguous 0 100% 0 3%
0 6% 0
Column 22 32 9 63
Total 35% 51% 14% 100
Analysis
1. The row totals continue to demonstrate the respondents' virtual even split on this
issue.
8
2. Support for "staying the park" emerges from two children families in this Crosstab.
The small number of frequencies requires one to be cautious of suggesting that the
trend is statistically significant. Two children families represent 51% of the survey
respondents, however.
3. Though still closely divided in the respondents' opinion, families with more than one
child in the program agree that a child must stay at the park the entire time of the
activity.
Crosstabs by age for child #1 and #2 were prepared to learn whether the age variable might
provide insight into this evenly divided issue.
CROSS TABULATION Stay at the Park/Age of Child #1
Count 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Row Total
Row %
Column %
12 15 3 0 30
Yes 40% 50% 10% 48%
50% 75% 25%
12 5 9 5 31
Disagree 39% 16% 29% 16% 49%
50% 25% 75% 71%
2 2
Ambiguous 0 0 0 100% 3%
29%
Column 24 20 12 7 63
Total 38% 32% 19% 11% 100%
CROSS TABULATION Stay at the Park/Age of Child #2
Count 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Row Total
Row %
Column %
7 10 4 0 21
Agree 33% 48% 19% 50%
50% 67% 31%
7 4 9 0 20
Disagree 35% 20% 45% 48%
50% 27% 69%
1
Ambiguous 0 0 0 0 2%
Column 14 15 13 0 42
Total 33% 36% 31% 100%
9
Analysis
1. When the first child is "out of the picture," parents of a child #2 who is 5-6 years old
remain equally divided as to whether children must stay at the park.
2. Whether a 7-8 year old child is child #1 or child #2 the opinion that the child must
stay at the park receives its strongest support.
3. The overall even split remains, however, the child's age does influence parent opinion.
Summarv
General speaking, the Department's practice of the playground program being a drop in
activity is a practice approximately half of the respondents support, the other half are of the
opinion that their children have to stay at the park. The even distribution of opinion in a
sense explains the resistance staff experiences from parents who are asked to sign a'wvaiver"
that states that their child may not leave the park. The equal division of opinion provides
no clear cut course of action on this issue. Continued case by case monitoring as to which
child may or may not leave the park appears to be required to meet the expectations of the
parents of children in the programs.
¦ The survey introduced the subject of charging a fee for participation in Summer In
The Park. Recipients of the survey were asked to respond to the following question.
If a change in city policy introduced charging a fee for participation in Summer In The Park,
in your opinion, what fee would you consider to be fair and equitable and be willing to pay?
Check one.
10
A cross tabulation of responses to this question and how long the family has lived in Eagan
was made.
CROSS TABULATION Willing to pay/How long lived in Eagan
Count Less than 1 1 - 3 years 4 - 6 years More than Row Total
Row % year 6 years
Column %
0 5 3 7 15
$5.00 33% 20% 47% 24%
31% 23% 21%
1 6 5 13 25
$10.00 4% 24% 20% 52% 39%
100% 38% 39% 40%
1 3 4 8
$15.00 0 12.5% 37.5% 50% '13%
6% 23% 12%
1 1
$20.00 0 0 0 100% 2%
3%
2 1 3
None 0 67% 0 33% 5%
12.5 3%
2 2 7 11
Other 0 18% 18% 64% 17%
12.5% 15% 21%
Column 1 16 13 33 63
Total 2% 25% 21% 52% 100%
Analysis
1. The number of respondent families who have lived in Eagan for more than six years
was more than half of the study sample.
2. The "none" category refers to those respondents who actually stated they would not
pay to participate in the activity.
11
3. The "other" category refers to respondents who provided anecdotal evidence such as:
"We could not participate without scholarship assistance," or, "With this program being
free, it allows us to participate in other activities for which a fee is charged," or "We
chose not to participate in Summer School this year because of the cost."
4. 78% of the respondents volunteered a dollar figure that they would be willing to pay.
5. The Crosstab does not illustrate it, however, some ambivalence about the amount
respondents are willing to pay was noted. In 5 cases, 2 amounts were checked. The
lower amount was tabulated.
6. A comment was received that stated that if a fee were charged, the leaders would -
have to be qualified college graduates. (Fee checked $5.00)
7. Concern for child/staff ratio was expressed. The suggestion was that if a fee were
charged, more staff should be provided.
8. Overall this Crosstab demonstrates that respondents selected $10.00 as the fee they
would be most willing to pay. That group is however, only 39% of the sample.
9. The length of time a family has lived in Eagan does not significantly cause fluctuation
in willingness to pay.
10. Of those who have lived in Eagan for more than 6 years, however, the 7 respondents
who chose to comment rather than select a dollar amount should not be ignored. If
their comments were generalized to the entire Summer In The Park population, they
represent 125 participant families.
4.4.
12
A cross tabulation of willingness to pay/number of children in the family was prepared. It
was hoped that spreading the data apart in another configuration would provide clarity to
the opinions held by the respondents.
CROSS TABULATION Willing to pay/Number of children
Count 1 Child 2 Children 3 Children Row Total
Row %
Column %
$5.00 3 6 4 13
23% 46% 31% 21%
14% 19% 45%
7 16 3 26
$10.00 27% 62% 11% 41%
31% 50% 33%
9
$15.00 33% 56% 11% 14%
14% 16% 11%
1 1 0 2
$20.00 50% 50% 0 3%
5% 3% 0
0 2
0
None 0 1020%a 0 3%
0 6% 0
8 2 1 11
Other 73% 18% 9% 18%
36% 6% 11%
Column 22 32 9 63
Total 35% 51% 14% 100%
Analysis
1. Families of respondents with one child in the program voice more resistance to paying
a fee than respondents who have two children.
2. Respondents wiling to pay some fee are 79% of the sample.
3. Respondents with three children in the program, though small in number, do not
respond differently than those whose families are smaller in terms of the range of
dollar amount they would be willing to, pay.
13
Summary
More than 3/4 of the respondents said that, in their opinion, x dollars would be equitable
and they would be wiling to pay it. But, not without editorial comment. Voluntary
statements such as "It is nice to see tax dollars used in a positive way" or "We could afford
to pay, but what about the families that can't" or 'The best thing about this program is that
it's free" were found on numerous survey forms. The raw data on the Crosstabs does not
tabulate the "yes but" comments.
The "greatest good" adage of this public policy issue is more complex than the discovery that
over 75% of the respondents to this opinion survey are willing to pay a fee for the service,
in staff's view.
For Commission Action:
The intent of this report is to share information, generate discussion and to think in the long
term regarding current department practice and potential new public policy.
DP/nh
city of aagan
3830 PI101 KNOB ROAD THOMAS EG&N
EAGAN MINNESOTA 551221897 1i1a
PHONE (612)454-8100 DAVIDK GUSIAFSON
FAY (612) 454 8363 PAMELA McQtEA
TIM PAV/I.ENTY
THEODORE WACHTER
July 22, 1991 Counca Metrs
THOMAS HEDGES
City Admnstrator
TO THE PARENTS OF EAGAN PARKS AND RECREATION EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
SUMMER IN THE PARK PARTICIPANTS City Cler
You have been selected by random sample to participate in this opinion survey. The
Department of Parks and Recreation requests your assistance with the exploration of
options for the Summer in the Park playground program in 1991 and future years.
Recreation Staff ask that you take a few minutes to complete this questionnaire. Fold and
staple your anonymous response and return it to the Department by July 31, 1991.
Returns may be made in one of three ways:
¦ Drop Box at the Municipal Center.
¦ Mail-in to the Municipal Center.
¦ Give to playground leader at the park.
1. How many years has your family participated in Summer in the Park?
1
2-3
4-5
6
2. How many children do you have enrolled in the program?
1
2
3
4
3. What are the ages of your children who participate In the playground program?
Child #1 Child # Child #3 Child #4
_ 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-6
7-8 7-8 _ 7-8 7-8
9-10 9-10 9-10 9-10
11-12 11-12 11-12 11-12
O.
THE LONE OAK TREE.. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/AHirmattve Action Employer
4. Have your children participated in the playground activities at the same park each
year?
Yes
No
5. How frequently do your children attend Summer in the Park?
Once a week
Twice a week
Three times a week
All four days
6. What attracts your family to the playground program?
Social play environment
Supervised play environment
Enthusiasm of the playground staff
Creative activities
Games and contests
Other:
7. Do your children attend the field trips?
Yes
No
8. If a change in City policy introduced charging a fee for participation in Summer in
the Park, in your opinion, what fee would you consider to be fair and equitable and
be willing to pay? Check one.
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
Other:
9. In what City sponsored recreation activities have your children participated?
Camp Creative
Eaganettes
_ Fitness and Fun
Games Kids Play
Imagine That
School's Out Parties
Tennis Lessons
Tiny Tots Recreational Activities
Wagonful'O Fun
Other:
~v3:
10. Which registration practice is the most convenient to you?
Drop box
In-person evening registration sessions
Mail-in
In-person during Municipal Center regular hours (8 AM - 4:30 PM)
In-person on opening Saturday registration
11. The Summer in the Park playground program, in your opinion, is:
More than you anticipated
_ What you anticipated
Less than you anticipated
12. In your opinion, is there a need for a day long playground program?
Yes
No
13. When your child comes to Summer in the Park at 1:00 PM (or 9:00 AM); he/she
must stay until 4:00 PM (or 11:30 AM).
Agree
Disagree
14. How far do you live from the park at which your children participate in Summer in
the Park?
Less than 1 /2 mile
1 /2 to 1 mile
1-3 miles
More than 3 miles
15. How long have you lived in Eagan?
Less than one year
1-3 years
_ 4-6 years
More than 6 years
16. Did your children participate in a summer playground program in your previous
city of residence?
_ Yes
No
Comments:
Thank you for your assistance.
10k
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS FOR JANUARY, 1992
1.*« Attending a recent Eagan Athletic Association board meeting, staff learned that the Association will
offer a track program for the first time in 1992.
o The activity is offered to boys and girls ages 5 through 12
o Registrations will begin in mid February
o The first track meets will be held at Eagan High School on April 11
o EAA anticipates 500 - 600 participants
The Department strongly supports this new sports offering for Eagan's youth.
2.*« Twenty-three (23) youth, grades 3, 4 and 5 have registered for the Bandy School. The group meets on
Saturday mornings from 10:00 A.M. - Noon at the Lexington Bandy rink. Members of Minnesota
Women's Bandy have conducted spirited work-outs with the children.
The teen arm of Bandy is an open invitation to meet at the rink on Sundays at Noon. The first day of
this activity found significant activity at the rink. Youth, along with members of men's Bandy teams
were observed working out on skates, with stick in hand, chasing that funny looking orange ball around
the rink!
1*44 The Departments' lay-out for the 1992 City map has gone to the printer. In addition to the map with
park locations, the Department provides a matrix of the major components in each park, 1992 recreation
registration dates, hot line information, and generalized recreation activity write-ups. The map will again
be distributed to the Community with the 1992 City telephone directory.
4.*« The Baby Sitting/Latch Key Clinic, Co-sponsored by the Department and the Women's Fire Auxiliary,
filled at 30 students. The Latch Key portion of the curriculum is new in 1992.
5.*« Cross Country Ski lessons were completed as scheduled. The trails at Lebanon Hills Park were in
surprisingly good condition. Despite the cold temperatures on January 18, classes were held and
attendance was good. Class members knew that they'd be on the trail, out of the wind and were eager
to proceed with this adventure.
6.*K Staff will be conducting National Youth Sports Coaches Associations Coaches Certification Clinics
during the month of April, primarily. Sports to be covered include track, baseball, softball and soccer.
This requires:
o separate clinics, by sport, for coaches new to the certification program.
o separate sessions for coaches in the second and third years of the program.
o coordination with Eagan Athletic Association and Rosemount Area Athletic Association
programs.
Clinics are conducted for RAAA, because Rosemount Parks and Recreation Department does not offer
the coaches certification program.
7.*« Staff will be working with new EAA sports directors for the baseball and softball youth programs. The
primary challenge is to encourage continued cooperation rather than competition where facilities are
concerned.
/5-
8.*« The outdoor skating season has seen huge swings in the weather from warm to very cold to warm again.
Skating lessons missed one week and 4-Man Hockey missed two weeks, but otherwise programs have
continued to happen as scheduled. The plan remains to close the shelters at the Class C sites after
February 2, most of the B sites after February 9th, and the rest by February 19. Trapp Farm Park
Tubing Hill could remain open after that date on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays only for up to two
more weekends closing March 1st.
9.*« Leagues are winding down. Men's broomball on Sundays and Mondays should end by February 3. Co-
Rec Broomball ends February 7. Four-Man hockey ends February 19. The basketball leagues go into
March.
10.*« Twelve Co-Rec and 8 Men's teams are ready for the Snow Softball Tournament February 1st at
Northview Athletic Fields. Warm temperatures and snow-covered fields should make for a great time.
Six boot hockey teams are entered in the tournament scheduled for Sunday, February 2nd. Both
tourneys are a part of our Winter Week-end.
11.*« Softball registration information is going out in early February to 200-plus teams. It is anticipated that
230 teams will register in 1992 for the summer season.
12.* < The winter volleyball leagues are underway with 16 Co-Ed officiated teams, and 32 Co-Ed Recreational
teams playing on Friday evenings. Seven men's and 9 women's teams play officiated volleyball on
Tuesday evenings.
Officiated games are played at Dakota Hills Middle School while the recreational teams play at
Deerwood, Oak Ridge, Pinewood and Woodland Elementary Schools.
13.*<< Maintenance of the City's skating sites continued throughout the month of January, following a season
of unseasonably warm weather; the rinks were officially closed on Sunday, January 5th. With the extra
efforts of the maintenance personnel, preparations were made for re-opening of the rinks on January
10th.
14.*,< With colder temperatures in the middle of January, the rinks were returned to a good to excellent
skating condition. The City's Zamboni ice shaver was used on a regular basis on the Class A and B
sites, including the new bandy rink at Lexington and Diffley Avenues. Regulation lines and circles were
also painted on the rinks at Goat Hill, Bridle Ridge and Rahn Parks. Painting was also completed on
the bandy rink and a speed skating oval was applied to the rink at Clearwater Park.
15.*« Three new hockey goals were fabricated to replace three older ones that need repairs.
16.* < The sledding hill at Trapp Farm Park continued to see heavy use throughout the use of January. The
maintenance division responded with additional snow tubes and also reinforced fence on the south side
of the hill to make it easier for sledders to climb to the top.
17.*« Maintenance assistance was provided to numerous recreation events during the month of July. These
included the winter week-end programs, softball tournament, boot hockey tournament, moonlight skiing
event, fishing contest, bandy clinic and mite hockey tournament.
18.*<< The aeration system continued in operation throughout the month of January. As in past years, extra
efforts were made to provide safety fencing and signage around the aerator as well as well as major axis
points to the lake. To spite the consistent snow cover the aerator has been able to maintain sufficient
oxygen levels within the lake. The aeration and security fencing has also received positive comments
from the D.N.R., who also perform weekly safety inspections at the site.
/Q
19.*« Training sessions were conducted with full time maintenance staff on the topics of ice safety and winter
survival. VCR training tapes from the department of Natural Resources assisted with these tr aining
programs.
20.*« Delivery was taken on new stack chairs for the community room in the Rahn Park shelter building. The
previous wooden benches that had been located at this site were moved to the pleasure rinks at all A,
B, and C skating sites. Having benches at pleasure rinks provide an extra resting place for parents or
children and a convenient place for to tie skate laces.
21.*« A new park identification sign was installed at Clearwater Park, replacing the previous one entitled "Well
Site Park".
22.*« The City Forester Division continued tree pruning activities into the month of January. Specific parks
included Lexington, Country Home, High View and Quarry. Pruning will continue into late February
or early March.
23.*« On January 2, City Forester Tom Schuster, attended a workshop entitled "How to inspect for Gypsy
Moths in your Community" presented by the Minnesota and the U.S. Departments of Agriculture. Tom
received training and a manual on how to conduct inspections on outdoor household items for gypsy
moth life stages. Gypsy moth infestation has been identified in Apple Valley and the Department of
Minnesota Department of Agriculture is increasingly concerned about outbreaks in surrounding areas.
Gypsy moth is considered to be a foracious defoliator of deciduous and coniferous trees and is
considered to be a bigger problem than the caterpillar or cancer worm.
24.*« John VonDeLinde, Rich Brasch and Tom Schuster attended a legislative commission on Minnesota
Resources Grants Workshop on January 7th. The Parks and Recreation Department is currently
preparing application for four grants to the L.C.M.R. with urban reforestation, environmental education
and water quality research projects.
25.*« Staff has been in contact with Dakota County Engineering regarding the trails location and design along
County Road 30. A meeting with Mr. Caponi to review the impacts on the Art Park as a result of
construction of the road is a primary concern. Plans are still in a preliminary stage and the department
hopes to affect some changes in design.
26.*« The director has met with school district officials and Wold Architects on the new Middle School design
and field lay-out proposed. The school will be constructed next to Deerwood Elementary, construction
is expected to start in September or October.
27.*,< In the space of three weeks, staff held a proposers meeting with architects, reviewed the responses to
the R.F.P., set-up and held interviews with four firms. The firm of Ankeny, Kell, Richtor & Associates
were chosen to do the first phase design/cost estimating on the proposed arena/pool.
*City Council Meeting - 2/4/92
Advisory Parks, Recreation & Natural Resource Comm. mtg.- 2/6/92
/0 7.
Draft: 8/14/90
8/20/90
9/20/90
BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING
PERMIT PROCEDURE
PART I
The City of Eagan now allows the planting of trees and shrubs within street right-of-ways
(boulevards), by permit, with certain restrictions. These restrictions take into consideration
location and clearance for underground utilities, sidewalks, street design, schedules for major
construction, and vehicle/pedestrian visibility.
The City may deny issuance of a planting permit, if in the opinion of the City, such planting
may become a visual obstruction or intrusion for safe vehicle and/or pedestrian traffic, or
insufficient space exists as a result of utilities or sidewalk locations.
PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PLANTING PERMIT:
1. Fill out the application form provided. This form requests your name, address of the
resident/business where the planting will take place, species to be planted and
location.
2. Call Gopher State One Call (454-0002) to obtain utility locations for the general area
of interest. After you have obtained utility locations, determine desired location for
the tree and field mark with a stake. Mark the stake with the tree species or
corresponding number on the application.
3. Mail or bring the application to the Eagan City Forester, City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot
Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122.
City staff will review the locations and make a site visit to determine if the application meets
permit requirements. A returned, approved application will be your permit to plant. There
is no permit fee required.
BOUELVARD TREE PLANTING
PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
PART II
PERMIT TO PLANT:
Boulevard Tree Planting shall comply with the following provisions of the Eagan City Code:
SECTION 7-08 REGULATION OF GRASS, WEEDS, TREES, AND
LANDSCAPING
Subd 1 A. In no cases shall prohibited species be planted within street right-of-
ways. Prohibited species are defined as the following trees:
Gingko (female only)
Box elder
Non disease resistant elm species
Non hybrid cottonwood species
D. The placement of trees and shrubs in public places and streets right-
of-ways shall be in compliance with the following City standards:
1. Trees shall not be planted within ten feet, horizontally, of any
sewer line, water line or driveway, or within four feet of any
public trail or sidewalk.
2. The placement of trees and shrubs within public right-of-way
shall not disturb any ground within two feet, horizontally, of any
gas lines, electric lines, phone lines, or cable television lines,
except in those specific cases where utility easements require
greater setbacks.
3. Any new trees planted within a street right-of-way shall be
spaced no closer than 20 feet apart and must be at least 10 feet
from the back of curb in an urban section or 20 feet from the
edge of pavement in a rural section.
4. Trees, shrubbery, and other plant materials shall not be planted
or maintained, on public or private property, in such a manner
as to obscure or impede the visual sightlines required to ensure
the safe and efficient circulation of vehicles and pedestrians on
streets, intersections, trails, driveways, and sidewalks.
5. Overhanging branches of all deciduous trees, planted within
street right-of-ways shall, at the time of maturity, be at least 13
1/2 feet above street surfaces and at least 8 feet above the
ground for all other public places. This requirement includes
trees that are planted on private property, but overhang within
public areas or right-of-ways.
LIABILITY:
The City of Eagan assumes no liability or responsibility for accidents to persons or property,
however caused, through the issuance of this permit. All work done under this permit shall
be performed without cost or obligation to the City of Eagan.
UTILITY LOCATIONS:
Utility locations must be obtained before permit approval is accepted by the applicant. Due
to the variance in utility locations, homeowners must still exercise caution in digging planting
holes when utilities are nearby.
DUTY OF PROPERTY OWNERS TO MAINTAIN TREES IN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS:
Boulevard tree maintenance shall comply with the following provisions of the Eagan
Municipal Code:
SECTION 7-08 REGULATION OF GRASS, WEEDS, TREES, AND
LANDSCAPING
Subd. 4 Duty of Property Owners to Maintain Trees Within Street Right-of-
Ways.
Every owner of property abutting City street right-of-ways shall, in
accordance with standards on file in the office of the City Forester,
maintain, trim, fertilize and irrigate all living trees or remove any
dead or non-conforming trees, from the line of such property nearest
to such street to the centerline of such street. It is the lawful duty of
citizens to follow such City standards, except in those cases where the
City has declared certain boulevards to be under the maintenance
jurisdiction of City departments.
BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING
OFFICIAL PERMIT
PART III
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE PLANTED:
OWNER OF PROPERTY (If different from Applicant):
TREES TO BE PLANTED:
Distance
Tree Variety Size Location from curb
Example:
Marshall's Ash 1 1/2" dia. 15 feet south of driveway 11'
1.
3.
4.
DIAGRAM:
Please attach a rough diagram of your lot and the right-of-way area showing the location of
structures, buildings, driveway, street edge or curb, and location of tree(s) to be planted.
• AGREEMENT:
I agree to plant the boulevard trees according to the above stated conditions. I have read
and understand the City Ordinance pertaining to tree planting and maintenance and
understand its contents. A copy of the ordinance is attached to and made a part of this
permit herewith.
I understand that the City of Eagan assumes no liability or responsibility for injury or
damage to persons or property however caused through the issuance of this permit. All
work done under this permit shall be performed without cost to or obligation by the City of
Eagan.
Signature of Applicant Date
Signature of Property Owner Date
(Please keep information sheet (Part IV) and return this signed portion to City Hall, 3830
Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122.)
FOR CITY USE:
Property I.D. # Lot Block
Subdivision
Application Record
Approved by:
Engineering Date
Approved by:
City Forester Date
Recorded by:
Date
22wp:blvdtree.pla
TIPS FOR PLANTING AND MAINTAINING BOULEVARD TREES
PART IV
Selecting Trees for Boulevards
There are many factors to consider when selecting trees for boulevard planting. Perhaps
the most important consideration is the hardiness of the proposed plant. Eagan is located
in hardiness zone 4. Only trees that are rated for zones 4 or less can be expected to
survive the wide range of seasonal weather conditions. It is important to consider the
tree's mature size. Selecting trees that will not outgrow their allotted space will save
maintenance time and eliminate the need to remove the trees before they reach maturity.
A tree's salt tolerance is also important and must be addressed. Some trees will have to
be placed further from the curb to minimize salt damage. Because of their growth habit
many trees are likely to obstruct vision and cannot be planted on the boulevard. Other
trees can litter sidewalks and streets with large and messy fruit, twigs, and leaves that can
plug sewers. These trees should be avoided. The best trees have deep roots which will
not clog sewer lines. The ideal trees will be hardy, of the proper size for the site, usually
deep rooted, insect and disease resistant, and of a variety requiring a minimum of pruning
and maintenance. Some of the species most often recommended by, nurserymen for
planting in boulevard areas include:
Norway Maple Imperial Honeylocust
Red Maple Kentucky Coffeetree
Sugar Maple Red Splendor Crabapple
Pin Oak Snowy Mountain Ash
Japanese Tree Lilac American Linden
Litle Leaf Linden Hackberry
Proper Installation Techniques
Trees are available in several forms; balled and burlapped, bare root, and container grown.
Each of these forms require slightly different procedures, but the general technique is
basically the same. The planting hole must be large enough to accomodate the roots of
the tree. A good rule of thumb is to make the planting hole twice as wide as the root
ball is wide. The tree should be planted at the same depth it was grown in a nursery.
The tree can be placed on undisturbed soil in the bottom of the hole or on compacted
backfill material. Any wire, rope, burlap or other binding material should be removed
from around the trunk and top of the root ball. The tree will have to eventually grow in
soil already existing on site. Therefore, amending drastically the soil used for backfill is
discouraged. At least 50% of the backfill material should be soil removed from the
original planting hole. Soil around the roots should be placed so there are no voids around
roots. A three inch watering basin should be constructed around the perimeter of the
planting hole. The tree should be watered at the time of planting. This will help fill the
voids around the roots/root ball. Some additional soil may have to be added at this time.
The watering basin should then be filled with mulch to a depth of 3 inches. Organic
mulch such as wood chips is recommended. Wood chips retain moisture making water
available to the plant and helps reduce harmful soil temperature fluctuations.
Care of Newly Planted Trees
The most important factor in caring for new trees is to ensure that adequate moisture is
available. When natural rainfall is not providing enough moisture, trees should be watered
every 5 - 7 days for at least the first two growing seasons after planting. Soil should be
moist, 6 - 10 inches deep to accomodate the tree's root zone. If fertilzier is used it should
be applied in late fall or early spring and never at the time of planting. Wait at least
until the end of the first growing season to apply fertilizer. If necessary, trees can be
staked or guyed using posts and wires. Thin barked trees such as maples and mountain
ash should be wrapped with tree wrap to protect the trunks from sun scald and frost
damage during the winter. Tree wrap should be applied in the fall and must be removed
in the spring.
park:blvdchce.284
PLANTING STANDARDS
BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE
1. Horizontal Setback:
- 2 feet from gas, electricity, phone, and cable television lines
- 4 feet from public trails or sidewalks
- 10 feet from sewer and water lines
10 feet from back of curb
- 10 feet from driveways
- general provision for intersections
2. Spacing:
Minimum 20 feet
3. Branch Clearance:
13.5 feet over streets
8 feet over trails and other public places
MEMO TO: Jim Sturm, City Planner, City of Eagan
FROM: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant
DATE: April 19, 1990
SUBJECT: Shade Trees & Landscaping
The following are suggested revisions to the 2-22-90 draft of the Eagan
Zoning Ordinance related to "Shade Trees & Landscaping". The suggested
• revisions are a result of the Eagan Developers comments from the April
12th meeting.
Subdivision 17A. The second paragraph would be revised to state... A
detailed Landscape Plan shall also be required, as stated above, before
a building permit is issued which would result in a ten '(10%) percent
or greater expansion of an existing building where an approved
landscape plan is not on file with the City. This plan may be
implemented over a period of three years and a performance guarantee
shall not be required. However, if the plan is not fully implemented
within three years, the City may complete the landscaping and assess
the benefited property for the improvement.
Subdivision 17B. A sentence shall be added related to preparation of
the Landscape Plan.
B. In every case where landscaping is required by provision of the
City Code or by an approval granted by the City, for a building or
structure to be constructed on any property, the applicant shall submit
a landscape plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of this
Section. The Landscape Plan shall include the detailed information set
forth upon the application form provided by the City. The Landscape
Plan shall be prepared and signed by a Landscape Architect registered
in the State of Minnesota or a certified Nurseryman. The City Planning
Director may waiver or modify Landscape Plan requirements where the
intent and purpose of this ordinance is otherwise met.
Subdivision 17C. Paragraphs (3) & (6) would be revised to read as
follows:
3) The Performance Guarantee shall be for five thousand (35,000)
dollars unless another amount is set by the City Council.
6) For any. landscaping or screening that is unacceptable, the
applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City
before the Guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, in
it's sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the Performance Guarantee
to accomplish performance. When the Performance Guarantee is
insufficient to complete the landscaping, the City may complete the
landscaping and assess the benefited property for the improvement.
J
Page 2
Subdivision 17 D2g would be revised to read as follows:
(g) Minimum Required Plant Material: When an inadequate landscape
plan is submitted, as determined by the Planning Director, the
developer shall be guided by providing plant material equal to two and
one half' (2 1/2%) percent of the cost or value of building(s),,
excluding land cost and site improvements, in providing an adequate
plan. Credit shall be given for existing plant materials which will be
preserved, however, in no instance shall plant material of a value less
than fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars be permitted unless otherwise
approved by the City Planning Director where the intent and purpose of
this ordinance is met.
Subdivision 18 Irrigation Systems
A. "Landscape Plans" as required by Section 11.30 Subdivision 17,
shall include an underground irrigation system as required below,
except where the open space is very large or reserved for future
expansion or the system would not be in keeping with the character of
the area as determined by the City Planning Director.
R-1 District - Not required.
R-2 District - Not required.
R-3 District - Required all yards.
R-4 District - Required all yards.
Commercial Districts - Required all yards.
industrial & R.U. Districts - Required all yards along a public
street or adjacent to a residential district.
Public Facilities - Required all yards along a public street.
Agricultural - Not required.
Public Parks - Not required.
Planned Development - Refer to above districts & related uses.
C. Underground irrigation systems shall extend beyond private
property onto public right-of-way (boulevard areas) and shall be
subject to approval by the City as provided in Chapter 6.43 Section
7.08.
Subdivision 19 and 20: Relating to screening and buffers would be
revised to eliminate the screening chart and the revised wording in its
entirety would be as follows:
Subdivision 19 Screen and Buffers
A. Purpose: The buffer is a designated unit of yard or open area
where distance, planting, berming and fencing minimize adverse impacts
of nuisance such as noise, glare, activity, dust, unsightly parking,
storage, signs or buildings.
Page 3
B. Description: All parking, loading, service, utility, and outdoor
storage areas shall be screened from all public streets and adjacent
differing land use. Screen shall consist of any combination of the
following: earth mounds, walls, fences, shrubs, deciduous overstory,
understory or coniferous trees or hedge materials. The height and
depth of the screening shall be consistent with the height and size of
the area to be screened. When natural materials, such as trees or
hedges, are used to meet the screening requirements of this subsection,
density and species of planting shall be such to achieve seventy-five
(75%) percent capacity year-round.
C. Maturity: For purposes of complying with all screening
requirements, a plant maturity of five years shall be used in
determining adequacy. In the interim, where a solid screen is needed,
a fence or other solid screen may be required until the plant material
has matured.
D.. Location of Buffers: Buffer yards shall generally be located
along lot boundary lines and shall not extend into or be located within
any portion of a street right-of-way. Where a required drainage,
utility or other easement is partially or wholly within a required
buffer as permitted by the City, the developer shall design the buffer
to eliminate or minimize plantings within the required easement. Such
design may necessitate choosing a buffer with more land area and fewer
required plantings.
E. Maintenance of Buffers: The responsibility for' maintenance of a
required buffer shall remain with the owner of the property. The owner
shall be responsible for installing live and healthy replacement plants
for any plants that die or are removed due to disease. Maintenance
shall consist of mowing, removal of litter and dead plant materials,
and necessary pruning. Natural water courses within a buffer shall be
maintained as free flowing and free of debris.
F. Plant Materials: All plant materials-required within a specified
buffer yard shall be planted to completion within sit months from date
of issuance of a building permit and thereafter shall be properly
maintained.
G. Minimum Size of Plant Materials: Plant materials shall be at a
size as required in Subdivision 17D.
H. Waifer of Buffer Requirements: Buffer requirements may be waived
or modified by the City Planning Director where the ~ntent is otherwise
satisfied by severe change in elevation, an existing'screen, extreme
distance or similar circumstance.
1. Responsibility for Buffer: The responsibility for establishing a
buffer shall be the owner of the heavier use district. However, the
adjacent owner of the lighter use shall be required to provide plant
Page 4
material and other normal landscape features along the common lot line
which will aid in the creation of a buffer.
a
TO: City of Eagan
FROM: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant
DATE: March 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Amendment of "Subdivision Regulation (Platting) - Chapter 13
Revise Section 13.30 Data and Design Standards by adding a new
paragraph 13.30 Subd 2B to read:
10. The location of all existing shrubs, trees, & tree clusters
as normally shown on a topographic map and the location and
size of all trees eight (8") inches or more caliper shall
be clearly indicated.
Revise Section 13.30 by revising Subdivision 11 to read:
Subdivision 11 Planting of Trees and Vegetation
Trees, shrubs and other vegetation shall be planted and maintained in
accordance with the following:
A. Street Trees - At locations where the City has an adopted
Master Planting Plan, the subdivider shall be required to
plant street trees, at his cost, in accordance with the
adopted Plan. Said Plan shall be kept on file in the office
of the Public Works Director.
B. Prior to approval of a final plat, the subdivider shall
submit a Subdivision Planting Plan for Approval by the City
providing for street trees & landscaping of public property
as may be required by the City. Individual lot landscape
plans shall be submitted with the application for a building
permit as required in "performance standards" section of the
City Zoning Ordinance Chapter 11.
C. The minimum size, species,. spacing, setback, location, method
of installation, maintenance & permitting process for street
trees and landscaping of boulevards and public spaces shall
be in accordance with the City's Master Planting Plan and
Section 7.08 and Section 10.20 of the City Code.
D. Underground irrigation systems, where required by the
"Performance Standards" section of the City Zoning Code -
Chaper 11, shall also be extended onto adjacent boulevard
areas. A permit shall be required by the Public Works
Director for underground irrigation systems to be located
upon public property.
E. All existing healthy trees and native vegetation shall be
preserved to the maximum extent feasible and shall be pro-
tected during construction. On heavily wooded lots, the City
will permit reasonable removal of trees of any size for a
suitable building site, parking and driveways. If a tree of
eight (8") inches or more caliper is proposed to be removed
1
where an alternative building, parking, or driveway location
may exist, the City may deny the request or may require a
suitable replacement tree(s) to be planted elsewhere.
F. Subdivision tree(s) shall not be planted in soil too poor to
insure growth. Where such poor soil exists, the subdivider
shall remove a minimum of twenty seven (27) cubic feet of
soil (3'x3'x3') and replace the poor soil with suitable loam
to insure proper growth.
G. Dead trees, uprooted stumps or similar debris shall be
removed from the site prior to release of any performance
guarantee.
H. Subdivision planting and performance as required by this
Subdivision 11 shall be guaranteed by the overall performance
bond or guarantee to be provided by subdivider and shall be
in accordance with the performance guarantee required for
private property plantings in the City'Zoning Code - Chapter
11.
3`
LAND-USE REGULATIONS (ZONING)
Chapter 11, Subdivisions
• 10.16 Shade Trees and Landscaping
• 10.17 Landscape Plan Required
• 10.18 Irrigation System
• 10.19 General Screening and Buffers
• 10.20 Buffers
• 10.21 Unlawful Cutting of Trees and Shrubs
• 10.22 Protection of Large Trees
• 10.23 Street Trees
• 10.24 Prohibited Tree Species
• 10.25 Prohibited Use of Trees
.~U
Revised: 02-22-1990
Subd. 16. Shade Trees and Landscaping
A. Purpose. The City Council finds that:
1) Trees are proven producers of oxygen, a necessary element
for human survival;
2) Trees appreciably reduce the ever increasing environmentally
dangerous carbon dioxide content of the air and play a vital
role in purifying the air we breathe;
3) Trees transpire considerable amounts of water each day and
thereby purify the air much like the air-washer devices used
on commercial air conditioning systems;
4) Trees have an important role in neutralizing waste water
passing through the ground from the surface to ground water
tables and lower aquifers;
5) Trees, through their root systems, stabilize the ground water
tables and play an important and effective part in soil
conservation, eroision control, and flood control;
6) Trees are an invaluable physical, aesthetic, and psychological
counterpoint to the urban setting, making urban life more
comfortable by providing shade and cooling the air and land,
reducing noise levels and glare, and breaking the monotony of
human developments on the land, particularly parking areas;
and
7) Trees have an important impact on the desirability of land and
therefore on property values.
B. Based upon these findings, the Council declares that it is
desirable and essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the
City to protect certain existing trees and plant materials, to
require new and additional plant materials and trees, to prohibit
the planting of certain species and to require the maintenance of
plant materials and trees as set forth in this Section.
C. The provisions of these subdivisions 16 through 21 shall pertain
only to private property. The planting & maintenance of trees
located upon public property, including street trees, is otherwise
regulated by Chapter 6.43 Subdivision 7.08, Section 10.20, 10.21 &
10.22 of the City Code and the Subdivision Regulation Chapter 13.
Subd. 17. Landscape Plan Required
A. When Required. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by the
City Planning Director before a building permit is issued for
any new development in any Commercial, Multiple Residential,
(R-2, R-3, & R-4) Industrial and Institutional Zoning District and
for all new developments, except single-family dwellings, in
Planned Development Districts or as otherwise provided by specific
planned development agreements.
A detailed Landscape Plan shall also be required, as stated above,
before a building permit is issued which would result in a ten
(10%) percent or greater expansion of an existing building where
an approved landscape plan is not on file with the City.
Page 1
A detailed Landscape Plan shall be provided with each preliminary.
plat showing existing and proposed landscape materials for the
boulevard areas and such additional detail as may otherwise be
required by the City Subdivision Regulations Ordinance and Tree
Maintenance Ordinance.
B. In every case where landscaping is required by provision of the
City Code or by an approval granted by the City, for a building or
structure to be constructed on any property, the applicant shall
submit a landscape plan prepared in accordance with the provisions
of this Section. The Landscape Plan shall include the detailed
information set forth upon the application form provided by the
City. The City Planning Director may waiver or modify Landscape
Plan requirements where the intent and purpose of this ordinance
is otherwise met.
C. Performance Guarantee.
1) A Performance Guarantee shall be required to insure completion
and maintenance of all landscape plans required by the City
for preliminary plats and building permits.
2) The Performance Guarantee shall be approved in form as to
security by the City.
3) The Performance Guarantee shall be in an amount to be
determined by the City and shall be for no less than one and
one-half (1 1/2) times the dollar amount estimated by the City
as the cost of completing the landscaping and screening as
shown on the approved landscape plan.
4) The Performance Guarantee shall cover one full calendar year
subsequent to the completion and satisfactoy acceptance by the
City of implementation of the approved landscape plan.
5) The Performance Guarantee shall only be released upon
inspection and written acceptance by the City.
6) For any landscaping or screening that is unacceptable, the
applicant shall replace the material to the satisfaction of
the City before the Bond is released. Where this is not done,
the City, in it's sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the
Performance Guarantee to accomplish performance.
D. All landscaping shall be implemented in accordance with the
following:
1) Minimum size at time of planting:
(a) Deciduous overstory plantings shall be a minimum of
two and one-half (2 1/2) caliper inches.
(b) Deciduous understory trees shall be a minimum of one
and one-half (1 1/2) caliper nches.
(c) Coniferous trees shall. be a minimum of six (6) feet
in height.
(d) Hedge materials shall be minimum of three (3) feet
in height.
2) For purposes of definition and standard, the following
shall be used:
(a) Caliper: The length of a straight line measured
through the trunk of a tree six (6) inches above the
Page 2
ground level.
(b) Coniferous/Evergreen Trees: A woody plant which, at
maturity, is at least thirty (30) feet or more in height,
with a single trunk, fully branched to the ground, having
foliage on the outermost portion of the branches year-
round.
(c) Deciduous Overstory Shade Tree: a woody plant which, at
maturity, is thirty (30) feet or more in height, with a
single trunk, unbranched for several feet above the
ground, having a defined crown, and which loses leaves
annually.
(d) Deciduous Understory Ornamental Tree: A woody plant
which, at maturity, is less than thirty (30) feet in
height, with a single trunk, unbranched for several feet
above the ground, having a defined crown which loses
leaves annually.
(e) Plant material Average Size (Coniferous): The total
height of all coniferous trees six (6) feet or over,
divided by the total number of such trees.
(f) Plant Materials Average Size (Shade or Ornamental): The
total diameter of all deciduous overstory trees two and
one-half (2 1/2) inches more in diameter, divided by the
total number of trees.
(g) Minimum Required Plant Material: In order to achieve
landscaping which is appropriate in scale with the size of
a building and site, the City may require plant material
equal to two and one-half (2 1/2 percent of the cost or
value of a building, excluding land cost or site
improvements. Credit shall be given for existing plant
materials which will be preserved, however, in no instance
shall plant material of a value less than fifteen thousand
($15,000) dollars be permitted unless otherwise approved
by the City Planning Director where the intent and purpose
of this ordinance is met.
(h) Planting Islands: Planting islands shall be required
where necessary to visually break up expanses of hard
surface parking areas, for safe and efficient traffic
movement, and to define rows of parking. Planting
islands shall occupy at least five (5%) percent of the
parking area.
(i) Method of Installation: All deciduous and coniferous
trees shall be balled and burlapped, staked, guyed and
planted in accordance with National Nurseryman's
standards.
(j) Sodding and Ground Cover: All open areas of a site not
occupied by building, parking or storage shall be sodded.
Exceptions to this are seeding of future expansion areas
as shown on approved plans and undisturbed areas
containing existing natural vegetation which can be
maintained free of foreign and noxious materials.
(k) Slopes and Berms: Final slopes greater than the ratio of
3/1 shall not be permitted without approval of special
treatment, such as special seed mixtures or reforestation,
terracing, or retaining walls. Berming used to provide
required screening of parking lots and other open areas
shall not have slopes in excess of 3/1.
(1) Maintenance: The property owner shall be responsible for
perpetual maintenance and for removal and replacement of
Page 3
any overgrown, diseased or dead trees, shrubs, ground
covers or sod. Such replacement shall be in accordance
with a landscape plan as approved by the City Planning
Director.
(m) Erosion Control: All areas of any site shall be
maintained in accordance with provisions of the Eagan
Erosion Control Manual.
(n) Preservation of Woodland Areas: It is the policy of the
City to preserve the natural woodland areas and clusters
of trees throughout the City and to retain as far as
practical, substantial tree stands which can be
incorporated into the Landscape Plan. No clear cutting of
woodland areas shall be permitted. Shade trees of eight
(8) inches or more caliper shall be saved unless it can be
demonstrated that there is no other feasible way to
develop the site. The City may require replacement of any
removed trees on a caliper inch for caliper inch basis.
(o) Placement of Plant Materials: No plant materials shall be
permitted within any utility easement, road right-of-way,
or immediately adjacent to any driveway or road inter-
section when it would interfere with motorists' views of
the street or roadway unless specifically approved by the
City (see Chapter 6.43 Subdivision 7.08).
(p) General Landscape Requirement: In all districts for all
developments, including single-family dwellings, all
exposed ground area, surrounding the principle building
and accessory buildings, which are not devoted to
driveways, sidewalks, or patios, shall be landscaped with
grass, shrubs, trees, or other landscape material.
(q) Replacement of Poor Soil: Where soil is found to be too
poor to insure growth of required plant material, the poor
soil shall be removed and replaced with suitable loam.
For trees, an area of a minimum of twenty-seven cubic feet
(3' x 3' x 3') shall be established with suitable soil.
Subd. 18. Irrigation System
A. All "Landscape Plans", as required by Section 11.30 Subdivision
17, shall include an underground irrigation system except where
the open space is very large or reserved for future expansion as
determined by the City Planning Director.
B. The irrigation system shall be a fully automatic, on timer,
offering system with fourteen (14) day alternate date watering.
The system shall provide head to head coverage with a matched
precipitation rate. The system shall meet Minnesota Department of
Health standards and shall provide backflow preventors.
C. Underground irrigation systems that extend beyond private property
onto public right-of-way (boulevard areas) shall be subject to
approval by the City as provided in Chapter 6.43 Section 7.08.
Subd. 19. General Screening and Buffers
A. Description. All parking, loading, service, utiltity, and outdoor
storage areas shall be screened from all public streets and
adjacent differing land use. Screening shall consist of any
combination of the following: earth mounds, walls, fences,
Page 4
shrubs, compact evergreen trees, or dense deciduous hedge as
further described in Section 11.30 Subd. 20F. The height and
depth of the screening shall be consistent with the height and
size of the area for which screening is required. When natural
materials, such as trees or hedges, are used to meet the screening
requirements of this subsection, density and species of planting
shall be such to achieve seventy-five (75%) capacity year-round.
Subd. 20. Buffers
A. Purpose: The buffer is a designated unit of yard or open area
where distance, planting, berming and fencing are required to
minimize adverse impacts of nuisances such as noise, glare,
activitiy, dust, unsightly parking, storage or signs.
B. Location of Buffers:
1) Buffer yards shall generally be located along lot boundary
lines and shall not extend into or be located within any
portion of a street right-of-way. Where a required drainage,
utility or other easement is partially or wholly within a
required buffer as permitted by the City, the developer shall
design the buffer to eliminate or minimize plantings within
the required easement. Such design may necessitate choosing a
buffer with more land area and fewer required plantings.`
C. Use of Buffers: A buffer may be used for some forms of passive
recreation; it may contain pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails,
provided that:
1) No plant material is eliminated.
2) The total width of the buffer is maintained.
3) All other regulations of the code are met.
4) In no event shall the following uses be allowed in buffers;
playfields, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts, or
similar active recreation uses.
5) A required buffer may include a stormwater retention area
when approved by the City.
D. Maintenance of Buffers: The responsibility for maintenance of a
required buffer shall remain with the owner of the property. The
owner shall be responsible for installing live and healthy
replacement plants for any plants that die or are removed due to
disease. Maintenance shall consist of mowing, removal of litter
and dead plant materials, and necessary pruning. Natural water
courses within a buffer shall be maintained as free flowing and
free of debris.
E. Table of Buffer Requirements. The buffer requirement is found by
locating the proposed use (district) in the left column. Each
adjacent land use (district) is identified across the top. Where
the row for the proposed use intersects the column for an adjacent
use, the letter identifying the required buffer is given.
For Agricultural uses (district), the Comprehensive Plan
designation for future uses shall be used in determining the
appropriate buffer.
Page 5
ADJACENT USE (DISTRICT)
1 "ND USE (DISTRICT) R-2 OTHER I-1 1 ;
R-1 R-3 R-4 LB ; BUSINESS; 1-2 RD P
R-2/R-3 A A B B C D A ; A
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
R-4 D B A B C C B ; B
LB D B B A B C ; B B
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
OTHER BUSINESS D C C B A B B; C
1-1/1-2 D D C C B - 1 C ; C
RD D D C B B C ; A ; A
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P (INSTITUTIONAL) A A B 1 B C C A;-
LETTERS A THROUGH D ARE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 11.30 SUBDIVISION 20F
F. Description of Buffer Types. Buffer yards, through the use of
trees, shrubs, hedges, earth mounds, walls, fences or natural
barriers shall provide screening in the percentages stated below
for the length of the common yard and for a minimum height from
ground level to six (6) feet.
Requirement "A" is minimum 20% screen.
Requirement "B" is minimum 40% screen.
'Requirement "C" is minimum 60% screen.
,Requirement "D" is minimum 80% screen.
G. Plant Materials. All plant materials required within a specified
buffer yard shall be planted to completion within six months from
date of approval of the site plan and thereafter shall be
properly maintained.
H. Minimum Size of Plant Materials. Plant materials shall be at a
size as required in subdivision 17D.
I. Prohibited Species. Prohibited species shall be the same as those
defined in subdivision 24.
J. Waiver of Buffer Requirements. Buffer requirements may be waived
or modified by the City Planning Director where the intent is
otherwise satisfied by severe change in elevation, an existing
screen, extreme distance or similar circumstance.
Subd. 21. Unlawful Cutting of Trees or Shrubs
A. No person shall for the purpose of increasing or enhancing the
visibility of any building or sign, damage, trim, destroy, or
remove any trees, shrubs, or other vegetation unless the work is
done pursuant to the express written authorization of the City.
Page 6
B. No person shall deface, destroy, remove, or injure any trees
located upon public property, including trees located within
public street right-of-way unless such removal is authorized by
the City.
Subd. 22. Protection of Large Trees
A. All existing trees, eight inches (8") in diameter or more (as
measured six (6") inches above grade), located upon private
property, shall not be removed except as follows:
1) The retention of such tree(s) would unreasonably burden the
development as determined by the City.
2) The tree(s) is diseased and needs to be removed.
B. No excavation or other subsurface disturbance shall be undertaken
within the drip line of any tree eight (8") inches in diameter or
more, and no impervious surface (including, but not limited to,
paving or buildings) may be located within 10 feet (measured from
the center of the trunk) of any tree eight (8") inches in diameter
or more unless compliance would unreasonably burden the
development. For purposes of this subsection, a drip line is
defined as a perimeter formed by the points farthest away from the
trunk of a tree where precipitation falling from the branches of
that tree lands on the ground.
Subd. 23. Street Trees
Trees located within the public right-of-way (boulevard area)
shall be planted and maintained in accordance with the provision
of Chapter 6.43 Section 7.08 of the City Code.
Subd. 24 Prohibited Tree Species
It shall be unlawful to introduce prohibited species to any lot or
land parcel where such trees are not naturally occurring or to
plant upon public land or right-of-way. Prohibited species are
defined as the following trees:
Gingko (female only)
Box elder
Non disease resistant elm species
Non hybrid cottonwood species.
Subd. 25 Prohibited Use of Trees
No tree shall be used for signs, permanent lighting, antennas or
similar use.
Page 7
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
(TOWN CENTRE 100 10TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: ROVICK REALTY COMPANY
LOCATION: OUTLOT A TOWN CENTRE 100 2ND ADDITION
NW QUARTER OF SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LIMITED BUSINESS
(PD/LB)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 9, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on 1.6 acres of previously-zoned Planned
Development/Limited Business (PDILB) land and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a bank
drive-thru operation. The site is located south of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Yankee
Place, north of Town Centre Drive, and east of the existing professional building.
BACKGROUND: The site was platted as an Outlot in Town Centre 100 2nd Addition in
November of 1986. The site is open grassland void of any significant tree growth.
SITE PLAN: The site plan shows a joint bank and realty building with a footprint of
approximately 7,950 sq. ft. The realty office occupies approximately 4,900 sq. ft. and the
bank 2,350 sq. ft. The total lot coverage is 11%; Code allows 20% in a Limited Business
district. On-site parking requirements differ by use for this proposal, however the total on-
site parking required is 72 spaces. The plan submitted provides 74 stalls of which three are
designated handicapped.
All parking stalls meet City design standards. Also, the City requires drive-thru operations
to provide five stacking spaces per drive-thru lane. The plan submitted provides for a three-
lane drive-thru and provides five stacking spaces per lane.
The site is bounded by public streets on three sides. A full access is provided from Town
Centre Drive which lines up with the existing curb cut to Town Centre 100 6th Addition to
the south. The site will also have an "Exit Only egress to Yankee Place from the drive-thru.
The building will be brick on all sides. All parking and building setbacks meet, or exceed,
City requirements, however Dakota County will require additional R.O.W. of 15' along
Yankee Doodle Road to accommodate the county standard 75' half R.O.W. on limited
access County roads. Building and parking locations will require adjustment which can be
accommodated with the Final Plat submission.
The applicant is proposing a pylon sign at the NE comer of the site that is consistent with
the sign plan agreement for Town Centre. The entrance to the site will also have some
directional signage, the drive-thru teller egress should be signed "F.xdt Only" to Yankee Place
and the southern parking area shall be designated as employee parking.
PARKS & RECREATION: The Parks & Recreation Department staff will be
recommending to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at"its
February 6, 1992 meeting, that this proposal be subject, to constructing a 6'. wide concrete
sidewalk along Town Centre Drive.
LANDSCAPING: The landscape plan provides a mixture of overstory, understory, and
coniferous plant material that will be consistent with adjacent buildings and provide year
round visual interest. The Final Plat submission will need to be on a grading plan
demonstrating berming where parking abuts public streets.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: A grading, drainage and erosion control
plan was submitted, with the preliminary plat application. The grading of the proposed site
will require a 3' fill on the north end of the site and 2' cut on the south end. The grading
of the site must also match the existing grades along the west property line in order to
protect the landscaping that the existing office building has provided.
The drainage plan that was submitted proposes to drain the site overland to the south to
Town Centre Drive. However, this would overburden the existing catch basin in the
northwest quadrant of the Yankee Place/Town Centre Drive intersection. Staff
recommends that the developer construct two additional catch basins in the proposed
parking lot to intercept the surface water runoff from this site. The two catch basins could
be connected to the existing storm sewer in the intersection of Yankee Place and Town
Centre Drive.
The site must be in compliance with City requirements for minimum and maximum slopes,
protection of adjacent properties, construction of temporary and permanent vegetation to
control erosion and construction of silt fence to control erosion.
WATER OUALITY: This 1.59 acre commercial development will discharge stormwater to
Pond DP-20, an existing pond to the east which is classified as a nutrient trap in the City's
water quality management plan. DP-20 discharges to O'Leary Pond, a lake designated to
support indirect contact recreation activities.
In order to reduce adequately the impact of this development on the quality of water in
O'Leary Pond, an on-site treatment basin would be necessary. However, the site is too
small to accommodate on-site treatment. Therefore, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site
ponding will be required by the City. Based on the actual amount of impervious area shown
on the site plan submitted with the preliminary plat application (69%), the cash dedication
is:
0 .106 acres x $130,680/acre = $ 13,852
0 .26 acre-feet x 1613 yd3/ac.
x $2/yd. 839
Total Cash Required $ 14,691
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient size and depth is readily available to this
site. The sanitary sewer in Town Centre Drive is an 8" PVC pipe that was constructed in
1985. A 6" PVC service line has been stubbed to the site off the 8" line in Town Centre
Drive. The utility plan shows extending the 6" service line up to the building with cleanouts
being provided every 100 feet.
Watermain service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available on the south end
of the site. A 12" (ductile iron) DIP watermain was constructed in Town Centre` Drive in
1985. A 6" DIP service pipe with a gate valve has been stubbed to the site off the 12" main
in Town Centre Drive. There is an existing hydrant on the north end of the site along
Yankee Doodle Road and a hydrant in the southwest quadrant of the Yankee Place/Town
Centre Drive intersection. These two hydrants provide adequate fire protection.
STREETS/ ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is available from both Town
Centre Drive and Yankee Place, which are 44' wide bituminous streets with concrete curb
and gutter. The intersection of Yankee Place with Yankee Doodle Road in the northeast
corner of the site is an intersection that contains a full median opening with left turn lanes.
The driveway connections will be required to be constructed with concrete aprons and
concrete valley gutters.
The most recent submittal of the site plan for the preliminary plat application shows one
30' wide driveway opening in the southwest corner of the site and one 30' wide driveway
opening that will be an exit only on the east edge of the site. The alignment for the
proposed southwest entrance shall match the alignment of the existing parking lot entrance
on the south side of Town Centre Drive. The driveway connections will be required to be
constructed with concrete aprons and concrete valley gutters.
A 6' concrete sidewalk shall be constructed 8' from the back of curb along the south side
of the site with pedestrian ramps at all driveway connections.
City code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the
edge of the parking lots shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter.
sting 15' trailway, sidewalk and
ASEMENTSLRIGIIT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: There is an exi
snow storage easement along Town Centre Drive, Yankee Place and Yankee Doodle Drive.
Dakota County has also required dedication of 75 feet of half right-of-way and dedication
of restricted access along C.S.A.H. No. 28.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate timeframe as
required by the affected agency.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Town Centre 100 10th Addition
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
None
There are no pending assessments on this parcel at January 8, 1992, and there are levied
assessments showing on outstanding balance of $30,266.88.
1~a-
CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR TOWN CENTRE 100 10TH ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July
10, 1990 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B3, C2, C4, El, F1, G1, H1
2. Trash and recycling containers shall be located inside, or attached to the building
in an enclosure constructed of similar materials as the main building.
3. The building shall be constructed of brick on all four sides.
4. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the street.
5. The southern parking area shall be signed "Employee Parking".
6. Drive-thru egress shall be signed "Exit Only" at Yankee Place.
7. Berming shall be provided on all street sides.
8. All landscaped and bermed areas shall be irrigated.
9. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft.
10. Catch basins shall be constructed in the parking lot to intercept the surface water
runoff from this site prior to overland discharge onto the street.
11. The alignment of the southwest driveway opening from this site shall match the
alignment of the existing driveway on the south side of Town Centre Drive.
12. The southeast driveway opening from this site to Town Centre Drive shall be
deleted.
/l3
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial obligations -
1. This development shall accept its additional financial
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional,. drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development or
accommodate it.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume.
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with city
codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not be released
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City Code and engineering standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to
final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a
cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding
requirements in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
H. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
plataprv. con
LTS #2
vJ ~Iww~ ~ -
a o '5121
I- TAYARAC
Y- O CN K.
' QUARRY l - NONIIAT .
PARK FOREST RIDGE
S - IRONWOOD LN.
G- RED~M000 K.
STREET MAP d
€M r'4 S~w
cP O•LEART PARK
;NE NW
g-5 c
iRAll
IVE CSQ,1J
LAZE
Ft
U y' Ct.
~ ? E
'RD
dAN
r w -
- F :-i,:
GARDEN
S
'ONING MAP
IM 0^4 R-2y
f R=
' a•t - S+
}n f
L? e+o
CSIC NS
an
l l r•
K
iv C
as
tir
COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP - - LE - l 04N
L
L
04
P"i
p pp is 04
04 ow
04
WI.Orl1 ff0[ 'N 'M/ N
CIY w++.. 9
200..WWIH ••1.1 •1V tA7YYY Y31wOY
l'N w.n.wrl.Wl W.i
'bdt'ONLtaA)I(IS fWY1 BAVHYaOY - •.aerN•IN .a.as wa Y .••I wa ,.p. ao) p•a•daad
••i.!.. a•[••+N W1 W.i.tYq A • r t aNa /e.
A. ,•.r r r N)?.w,d .r a.w/n/ ]Iww~P[oa • AYYaYnp• .paM .
rl•IU.da a•,Ir IN
O d r rt. •L.. . q.a awi A)Na.a A.uw I '
YoutOOV .uua GOT YYAY23 01100
)o 3A!00 a31N3 N O1
1Y1d AYYYIYI'IYW K/•Y,/ 07~IAS~ "F"r
Mir
'TffL 7• A•y d{N. fVa Older ? p' r Iu.SN [L'II6 of a..•IY
a PAN )o dAL
p.a•O.ad a 1.16 la.tll• .ad .iVf
•~.ioM P / / ONE p YYYMY]YY.
O.aa a.dlI.a 11 C •010000
19
uwa./) ag611 0000 0010.p V / ~-L,.b" A*f ~ OII~1A1-I
..It ..Nod ala».1• p0003...pu...aou.0 ^ 6~~
.u110did •.f 1.a.11P1 ..aau.a - \ • '
3.aaa6 Pu. gana 01033*0a naoup 7C L /w/ t
pow) atl.N.••N 11oa, ••aeup • m ' A~ p<•/ / 1
.ioY N. •a.. U-NON W»i ..i...0 • ti .
• tIl' )
.6. )f.•if ?.i.,•auo3 1 \ 4 GIU
.3-,.Ml a•ld p.paoa .00 oa 6o13aoaa• f rN \ I I II g~ \
MOtiI00Y ONO31 YAO 001 ]YIN/] NNOA S Cbf ~
v i.taro f
001W03 30 AlYYdOW
N Y1I = 1O1 I .
aw.N.. Wa.aYa .i
'IV N
1lY n • 1 ~ .
O. II • W I IW
l1 W • 'Y M I I -\i 1 e
tie
-N-
~g~ ONflOO 3
0y-03}-ag011-310009'- 33NNVA 7f
x
Ila
6 a
tt
gut{ s EA Ulu m Iii ( It
- ~ f~1?~i.i3~-fiVA'
--.w__ wrorr w.s4r ,riven
Poo
I I
W I I ILJ
Ian t a_
rMTrillitif
1 I C
0 i?~i I I I I I I I I r
O p' J 1
I Il 11+'t{ i H
_ %4 0,
I
e~- 9a
Sty
M r V ~
W i ;
U3 I
.J C
VRI
A r°H ° l SEE Ii
3QY W aaNNVA+
as o'_ g r R H +3
S• I
,W N N, .
z
` m
Ao R
- 3
%pg
i :11111 .
UW
1
IUIU! - ~Te o ~F OU _ 2c„•a , f~.. Ornt' ,
pP : ` i e,B0:. 912
+B~/176. +(rAy y i?~r 1.6# 9 leX60 A 1YS 890. SERA^p PT E, 6.0
56.0', c 1~+7<.. 4 u, 873.6 I J I I
jI
r62.0• L r:
41 -82•Z.7 1 fl.~~ tiZ~ B e.0
842. DP-13
1• : FFf2E'. - 1 882.0
x r„~ l, ?Z_ _ . :2 884.5
ADDITIO l 8-6.0 DP-6 / DP-11
CP-3 P-5 8 .5 866.3 g56
850.9 873.9..
:p,;Cr, a:~rt ( a i DP-
rcii. - z ~ l` % I 838,3
85.9
t.; ~ L.S.
26 -7
876
C -t J
76.0 879. Hr lq` D
q~ in 0 Ni,.
JI~.YSB.S Y n_ Iron r
( r _ _ DPr10
umly -4 r31 I__ ~.J L.I DP-2 TC_ 'kF_ 8¢ 858.3 v'I
a i. q Uli ti 6 ni N li 901.a aUU. v' 862.8
Q ! Wart 904. loo O,
I.} I/rIy'JdHTS, I AS' ~TwTOwN. . DP-T`. '~r Q
Jam: r~~+ 'IrTc JB93.0. T IgC882~ ;Tuaxi::
.CiP I +:GN
7t 7U t0 B9 .6, T 0'I CA fith Dw ~.P-2.~r.
S.. 8250 2l,t1i4iI/41 - qI k~' L~)a,ou 973.0
JP-663• I ` 9 0 j \'h T11.7- JP-46 882.0
i _t1~~ `c rl u.,`~ (~l Ix t 9_ r, .1 • ~u ,CrQf~n 51 ^Yl.l. i,
6$4 Tlt 1 I.89.
(I . J 1 J , 871.0
QP- ,Y ~JS,Ir~j,. iaLL_ ,(i' _ SAP:6 X93 OZ II II~P45
II II !3~ 4 994.0 Jr'-42
844:J~JP 6P i3 ~g/ F~ g. x.11 1
CP-• /846.~ri 1 { 9Tfi0 JR-¢?I ~ ~ 6- r"S` nT,~tS rr' ¢,4T 888.0
795. L•~`, .JP~`2 O,j 871:0 r Ill JP-62:1 ~L. 890.0
brOB:~, . ,8.44 0-~}'1~I,~~~ 97.5 t / rJP-32.2 C
f321 9eq:O 11ll111•, 891.6
yfj~ ~r>g +(1 Flat iT 10
+I J~'`' 15 ' A
844.0 `118 9~~I~ i v
5 ' tiL 211111 1 X2.6 X12
C.
; ,I Tj`--1 JP Oa6T I JP-:32
I ! C' f 1 1L) {1 t~; L. I .1 iT' ; r Ti: 7 JRn,3 I. 989.0 1~~ .1
lJPrl4 1rL~. ~~1~1 JP II l!"899.51,
7 815.7 ~Ialrr.r ~n I~:: •i E
ter, 6
~ or/~ 8300 ~i.n,;uf9ZT.6rI,. 1 f
'JR=4-1-JP
la
823,8- 195.7 _ - 884 7' -301
r) r1`ry. 8340 'CITY 1 I Ll{
HALL 1;•' / nk~ ` ]J1.
1,...:,~i,'~873r
I 1792.3. BP.29~ lJ~_ 1~~1?ti r I 820.8 rf •I I :r-li,; Q.r
6P-2 f7lllJiL[!11 JP-10 Wtiruw;mhj
01.0 097 830.0
. I'? ll'I1111.1 ' ,;.t1E ''4p,K~~.1I ~e J-f rI 1 i,,-:j,f°i" II !'s
9/8 0
° t. 1 ,JP,.fi= ~ lil 8- ~\JP-49 962.6 t I I v 819.1
868.0 1K0Vi:..L J 1`- n •R;nn „d.
STORM SEWER LAYOUT
MAP
CITY OF
EAGAN
City Council for direction and at their December 23, 1991 City Council meeting, it was the
consensus of their Council to provide assistance in planning for future urban development,
specifically for the provision of utilities and streets. No interest in a joint park was
expressed. With Inver Grove Heights' comments, Eagan's staff review comments, and
neighbors in both Eagan and Inver Grove Heights, Lyman Lumber has resubmitted new
plans addressing all concerns.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located south abutting County Road 32 (Cliff Road),
west of the Inver Grove Heights city limits, and east of Trunk Highway 3 and the Soo Line
railroad tracks. Zoning of the surrounding properties is R-1 Single Family (12,000 sq. ft.
minimum lot size) to the north across Cliff Road; E-1 Residential (2.5 acre minimum lot
size); and Agricultural (5.0 acre minimum lot size) in Inver Grove Heights to the 'east;
Agricultural (5.0 acre minimum lot size) to the south; and R-1 (Manor Lake Additions) to
the west.
Two homesteads currently exist on the site (one gaining access from Cliff Road, the other
from T.H. 3), and will not remain with the development. Currently, there exists an access
easement extending from T.H. 3 east into Inver Grove Heights serving five homes and acting
as the southernmost boundary for the project.
The site is largely open grassland on a rolling terrain with 'a large stand of approximately 40
oak trees around the north edge of Pond LP-27. A detailed grading plan was submitted for
Lots 39-42, Block 1, showing existing trees, their sizes, proposed and existing grading
contours, house pads, and wetland limits to illustrate the developer's intention to ensure the
retention of this natural amenity.
COMMENTS: Weston Hills Addition proposes 131 lots and 6 outlots on 63.64 acres; the
largest lot is 40,590 square feet, the smallest 12,000 square feet, and the median lot size is
26,295 square feet. All lots have been designed to meet or exceed requirements for size and
width at setback. It is the intention of the developer to phase the project in two or three
phases from north to south. The proposal includes three cul-de-sacs: Weston Hills Court,
Weston Hills Place, and Weston Hills Circle. The northernmost cul-de-sac exceeds the 500'
maximum length and will require a Variance of 240' serving 18 lots. Access to the project
is from a median divided entryway onto Cliff Road. Lot 1, Block 1, shall take access from
Weston Hills Court.
The developer believes that secondary permanent access to this project should occur in a
southerly direction, with potential to connect with Gun Club Road accessing onto T.H. 3.
Stub streets have been provided on Stratford Lane to the east and Weston Hills Drive to
the south to accommodate future development access.
At this time, the Inver Grove Heights neighbors do not wish to relinquish use of their private
road and the unimproved portion of the 33' wide roadway easement. The developer has
taken the 33' wide easement and created six outlots attached to the backyards of the
adjoining lots. The outlots can then be added to the lots in Weston Hills or to. the area
south of Weston Hills if Lyman Lumber purchases the property.
/~S
TRAFFIC: The City's traffic consultants have had an opportunity to review the Preliminary
Plat plans and a future conceptual plan to the south with the County engineer and MnDot
representatives. Based on their review, SEH suggests that any secondary access to T.H. 3
come from the conceptual area south of the proposed plat and it is their recommendation
the plat be approved without access from Bristol Boulevard onto Highway 3.
SEH's comments also indicated two concerns with the platting of Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1,
Block 2. First, the divided roadway along Cliff Road may have operational problems. They
suggest that if a median boulevard is desirable, the developer reduce the size and the
southbound roadway and platted area be moved east, giving Lot 1, Block 1 would have a
straight north/south property line rather than a curved property line. Secondly, they feel Lot
1, Block 2 should be eliminated. It is located directly across from Weston Hills Court. If
removed, it would eliminate a triangular shaped area which they see as unbuildable giving
the City a future option for a combined roadway development from Inver Grove Heights.
Both issues can be accommodated with the Final Plat.
SEH's traffic analysis is included with this report. Staff concerns with the Cliff Road and
Highway 3 intersection prompted an accident report for the years 1986-1991 from the police
department showing the number of accidents as 39, with two being fatal. The two fatalities
represent one-third of all fatal accidents in Eagan during this time frame. MnDot has
acknowledged that accidents are on the rise and are a concern as volumes in that area are
expected to rise. MnDot does not anticipate a signaled intersection there for at least three
to five years.
PARKS AND RECREATION: The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources
Commission at their regular meeting of January 9, 1992 recommended this project be subject
to a cash park land dedication and a cash trailway dedication.
M 6_.
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING
WESTON HILLS ADDITION
APPLICANT: LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY
STEVE RYAN
LOCATION: P.I.D. #10-03600-010-02 &
P.I.D. #10-03600-021-08
EAST 1J2 OF SECTION 36
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 21, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been received by the Community
Development Department requesting a Rezoning of 63.64 acres from Agricultural to R-1
(Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat of 131 lots and six outlots. The Comprehensive
Guide Plan designates this area as D-I Single Family (0-3 units/acre). The proposed 2.06
density of this plat is in conformance with the guide plan and therefore no amendment is
necessary. This proposed plat is located south of County Road 32 (Cliff Road) and east of
Trunk Highway 3.
BACKGROUND: In 1988, the Meritor Development Corporation submitted applications
for Rezoning and a Preliminary Plat of 18.8 acres for a development named Boulder Crest
West Addition. At the same time, Meritor submitted plans to the City of Inver Grove
Heights for a plat called Boulder Crest East Addition consisting of 49 Single Family lots on
24 gross acres. The overall development would consist of 86 lots. The Inver Grove Heights
Planning Commission and City Council denied the Boulder Crest East project due to the
need for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning to allow a deviation from
the five-acre minimum lot size in that area, as well as the policy issue of extending the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line. In July 1988, the Mentor Corporation
withdrew their application due to Inver Grove Height's decision to not allow urban-type
development.
Originally, the Weston Hills plat was submitted for the December 19, 1991 Planning
Commission meeting. After staff review and review with Lyman Lumber, it was determined
that further analysis with the City of Inver Grove Heights was needed . Eagan staff asked
Inver Grove Heights staff to review the proposed plat. A staff-level meeting was held on
December 17, 1991 to ask Inver Grove Heights if the proposed plat should accommodate
the potential for development within Inver Grove Heights (i.e., roadway connections, utility
services extensions, joint park development, etc.). The Inver Grove Heights staff asked their
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: A grading, drainage and erosion control
plan was submitted for this development.
The site will drain primarily to the northwest into the proposed water quality and storage
pond, which will be designated as Pond LP-27.1. According to the preliminary grading plan,
approximately 53 acres will drain to Pond LP-27.1. This area includes 5.3 acres of Inver
Grove Heights that is currently undeveloped. The 53 acre drainage area will require a pond
with a storage volume of 8.3 acre feet and a flow out of 4 cfs. A storm sewer outlet for
Pond LP-27.1 is proposed to be provided to drain into the Cliff Road and S.T.H. No. 3 ditch
system.
Fifteen lots on the southwest comer of the proposed plat will have their backyards drain
into City Pond LP-27. Also, three acres along the north edge of the site will drain into the
Cliff Road ditch system.
There is a proposed cut of 10-12 feet on the north and westerly parts of the site and a 8-10
foot fill on the south end of the site. The developer proposes to save and protect the
existing trees around Pond LP-27. The rest of the site will be disturbed by the grading for
this development.
There is a need for additional catch basins and storm sewer to be added at the south end
of Weston Hills Court. Also, at the. intersection of Cliff Road with Weston Hills Drive,
catch basins shall be added to collect the runoff from Weston Hills Drive.
The site must be in compliance with City requirements for minimum and maximum slopes.
The final grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall include protection of adjacent
properties, construction of temporary and permanent vegetation to control erosion and
construction of silt fence to control erosion.
WATER QUALITY: This 64 acre single family residential development is. located in the
upper reach of drainage basin L. A 1.0 acre wetland is located in the northwest portion of
the site along the railroad tracks. This wetland is not identified on the City's Water Quality
Management Plan. The wetland is proposed to be improved to provide storm water
retention and water quality treatment and the pond will be designated as Pond LP-27.1.
The preliminary grading plan shows that approximately 48 acres of this site will. be directed
to Pond LP-27.1.
A 3.5 acre pond is located in the southwest comer of the site. This pond is identified on
the City's Water Quality Management Plan as Pond LP-27 and is classified- as a wildlife
habitat pond. The preliminary grading plan proposes to direct only backyard areas to Pond
LP-27.
Drainage basin L contains a high concentration of recreational class lakes immediately
adjacent to, and downstream of, the proposed development. These lakes include LP-26, LP-
28 (Manor Lake), LP-31 (Hay Lake), and LP-32 (Schwanz Lake). Maximum protection of
these lakes as well as some protection of the habitat around LP-27 will be accomplished by
routing most of the runoff to the north away from LP-27. One probable impact of adjusting
this drainage divide, however, will be to decrease the volume of runoff that enters LP-27
after development. Based on a rough estimate, runoff to LP-27 is expected to decrease by
about 33% on an average annual basis. Normal pond elevations in LP-27 may therefore
decrease until runoff from prospective future developments in the undeveloped areas to the
south are routed to the pond.
On-site ponding to treat runoff from the proposed development is both desirable and
feasible. The treatment pond (LP-27.1) will be constructed according to National Urban
Runoff Program (NURP) standards and will have a minimum wet volume of 5.2 acre-feet,
a minimum surface area at the normal water level of 1.05 acres, and a minimum mean
depth of 5.1 feet. The inlets shall be separated from the outlet to the maximum extent
practicable. Consistent with design standards, a minimum 10 foot wide bench with a 10:1
slope must be constructed around the edge of the pond just below the normal water level
to meet safety requirements. Finally, a skimmer should be constructed on the pond outlet.
UTILITIES: With the completion of Manor Lake 4th Addition, sanitary sewer service of
sufficient size and depth will be readily available to the southern two-thirds of this site. The
sanitary sewer in the Manor Lake 4th Addition will be constructed in Todd Avenue up to
the west right-of-way line of S.T.H. 3. The preliminary utility plan proposes to construct an
8" sanitary sewer line across Highway 3 at Todd Avenue to serve the development.
The northerly 34 lots are proposed to be served by a sanitary sewer line in Cliff Road that
needs to be extended from East Greenleaf Road to the east side of the railroad tracks. The
Developer intends to petition the City to have the sanitary sewer extension along Cliff Road
constructed as a public improvement project.
Watermain of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to this site in two
locations.
A 12" DIP line will tie into a 12" stub at the east end of Todd Avenue and an 8" line will
tie into an 8" stub located at the northeast end of Manor Lake Addition with both lines
crossing Highway 3 to provide water supply and fire protection to the site. A study was
conducted of the trunk water supply and distribution lines in this area of the City and it was
determined that a 12" trunk watermain should loop through the site from Todd Avenue and
then to the south property line. The watermain layout shall provide hydrants in locations
that meet the City requirements for fire protection.
VIt14'7 ;SIAt,.'UT-SSAAlt('ULATI)N! Street access to the site is readily available from
Cliff Road on the north end of the development. The street layout plan proposes to connect
to Cliff Road along the east boundary line of the plat which is also the east boundary of the
City of Eagan. The street layout plan proposes to provide a stub street into Inver Grove
Heights 1300 feet south of Cliff Road that could serve as an east-west corridor into Inver
Grove Heights. The street layout plan also provides a stub street to the south that could
be extended to Gun Club Road as the area to the south of this plat develops.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required to provide
the appropriate ponding easement for Pond LP-27.1 to incorporate the required high water
level and storage volumes. The City will require a 30 foot drainage and utility easements
centered on the common lot line of Lots 32 and 33, Block 1; Lots 8 and 9 of Block 4; and
Lots 22 and 23 of Block 4 for the purpose of repair and maintenance of the sanitary sewer
watermain and storm sewer lines located within. The City recommends that these lots be
widened to accommodate these larger easements. .
The Dakota County Plat Commission recommended that Lots 1-5, Block 1 be enlarged with
more depth from CSAH 32 because of the severe slope to provide for future slope
construction when Cliff Road is upgraded.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate timeframe as
required by the affected agency. A Dakota County Highway Department permit will be
required to allow discharge of storm water runoff in the Cliff Road ditch system.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Weston Hills Addition
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the. City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. 5.069/sf 2,284,722 SO) S157.646
t1 his area will be credited for the area of any ponding easements granted to the' City.
There are outstanding assessments totaling $48,287 on these properties. At this date, there is
no record of a pending assessment against these properties.
JAN-22-1992 14:24 FROM SEH INC. TO 6814612 P.02
AdV
,r? MEMORANDUM
a IAt~Cw /p~yq 3536 VAD1~V15CElV1E DRII~ ST AUA4 MINNI3t7111 ss1ro 512 4902000
TO: JIM STORM, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF RAGAN
FROM: GLEN VAN WORMER-1908 BYERS, SSH
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1992
SUBJECT: EAGAN, MINNESOTA
WESTON HILLS PRELIMINARY PLAT
TRAFFIC REVIEW
SSH FILE NO. 89040
We have had an Opportunity` to review the preliminary plat for
Weston Hills located in the ,southeast corner of Trunk Highway 3
and Cliff Road (County Road 32). We recently met with the County
traffic engineer regarding the plat and access to it and have
also discussed it with representatives of Mn/DOT. Based on our
review and conversations, we have several comments for
consideration by the City and by the developer. Our review
included a consideration of future preliminary plans for
extending the Weston Hills development south to roughly Oun Club
Road.
SURROUNDING ROADWAY SYSTEM
T.H. 3, the westerly boundary of the plat, is a major north-south
route in Dakota County now and will continue to be so in the
future. Currently, there is limited access to the highway due to
the parallel railroad tracks on the east side and the orientation
of development along the highway. This plat helps to retain the
limitation of- accesS by orienting all development to internal
roads. '
Cliff Road Currently Carries relatively *Low volumes, especially
east of Highway 3. However, it will continue to grow in stature
as a major east-west route in Dakota County providing connections
to I35W on the West and potentially to Highway 52 on the east.
SKweUvu
H&VONCKM WC
`dorx
JAN-22-1992 14:25 FROM SEH INC. TO 6814612 P.03
Jim Sturm
January 16, 1992
Page #2
As such, the traffic volumes in the future will continue to grow
east of Highway 3.
The existing intersection of Highway 3 and Cliff Road has had
increasing volumes with continuing development of the area.
Mn/DOT has indicated that accidents ars increasing and are
becoming somewhat of a concern. We anticipate that the volumes
will justify traffic signals and that they should be in place
within the next three to five years.
WESTON HILLS PLAT
The plat shows access to Cliff Road at the northeast corner or as
far sway from Highway 3 as possible within the platted area.
This is the most desirable location, maximizing the distance
between the potential signalized intersection and the railroad
crossing and the plat access. This distance is approximately 500
feet from the railroad right-of-way and approximately 600 feet
from the Highway 3 intersection. Dakota County has indicated
Concerns over this distance and would like to nee it increased,
but recognizes the limitations within the platted area.
The concept plat for the completion of Weston Hills indicates
access to Gun Club Road and ultimately onto Highway 3 at Gun Club
Road. Future traffic in the far southerly portions of the future
development area will probably utilize Gun Club Road to gain
access to Highway 3. However, it is likely that all the traffic;
from the proposed 132 lots in Weston Hills and a significant
portion of those in the northerly portion of the area just south
of the proposed development will gain access to Highway 3 via
Cliff Road and Weston Hills Drive.
Jt4-22-1992 14:26 FROM SE}I INC. TO 6814612 P.04
Jim Sturm
January 16, 1992
Page #3
The lots shown in the preliminary plat for Weston Hills will
generate approximately 1300 trips on an average day. With single
access to the north to Cliff Road, all 1300 trips will be
concentrated past the northerly few lots. With the additional
future development to the south as shown on the concept plans,
there may 400 to 600 vehicles added all along Weston Hills Drive.
This places the volume Just south of Cliff Road at just less than
2000 or relatively heavy for a residential street.
ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION
Dakota County is requesting consideration of additional access
onto Highway 3 from Bristol Boulevard, just south of Todd Avenue
as platted in the Manor Lake addition (West of TH-3). The County
indicated that if the Cliff Road and Weston Hills Drive
intersection becomes congested because of its relatively close
spacing to Highway 3, that this connection from Bristol Boulevard
to Highway 3 could serve as an alternate.
We do not favor the concept of additional access to Highway 3
between Cliff Road and Gun Club Road. If the need for additional
access becomes apparent in the future, we would suggest that it
may be better to consider a secondary access from the conceptual
development area south of the proposed plat. Better overall
spacing could be achieved if the access were located near the
property currently owned by Finch.
With some minor modifications of the street system. Layouts in the
development south of the proposed platted area, more traffic may
be oriented to Gun Club Road, both reducing the volume on Weston
Hills Drive and at the Cliff Road intersection.
/3/
JAN-22-1992 14:26 FROM SEH INC. TO 6814612 P.06
Jim Sturm
January 16, 1992
Page #4
our recommendation, therefore, is that the plat be approved
without access from Bristol Boulevard onto Highway 3. This would
help protect the integrity of the higher speed, higher volume
Highway 3 in the future.
We have also reviewed the internal street layouts within the
Weston Hills plat. Weston Hills Drive is a major north-south
street and could carry volumes as indicated earlier of up to 1900
vehicles per day. The alignment at intersections appear
satisfactory within the preliminary plat area. We do have some
concerns over the concept development design south of the
preliminary plat area, especially the S-curve and the modified
cul-de-sac on -the weary property. Again, some modifications are
possible to remove that concern when it is finally submitted for
plat review.
There is a potential extension of Stratford Lane to the east into
Inver Grove Heights. Although Inver Grove Heights has limited
interests in expansion to the east, this roadway will provide
-opportunities for movement of local traffic in the future without
forcing it onto County roads and trunk highways.
We have some concerns with the details of platting on Weston
Hills Drive between Weston Hills Court and Cliff Road. The
divided roadway at Cliff Road may have operational problems and
we would suggest that if a median boulevard area is desirable
that it be smaller in size and that the southbound roadway and
the platted area be moved further east. Lot 1 of block"1 would
therefore have a straight north-south easterly border rather than
a curved easterly border.
Jf;V-22-1992 14:27 FROM SEH INC. TO 6814612 P.06
Jim Sturm
January 16, 1992
Page #5
We would also suggest that Lot 1 of block 2 be teennimated
directly eggs from Weston Hills court eliminating a triangular
area which is basically unbuildable. This would give the City
options in the future for a combined roadway with development
from Inver Grove Heights. If the County restricts access from
Weston Hills Drive onto Cliff Road in the future, a secondary
connection into Inver Grove Heights at Weston Hills Court would
also be possible. This should have little if any impact on the
platted lots as shown.
SUMMARY
We feel that the preliminary plat as shown is basically
acceptable from a traffic standpoint. Minor modifications to two
lots and an understanding of the relationship of the plat to
future plate to the south and east should eliminate any
operational problems and give the City some future flexibility.
We recommend that the plat be approved without access to Highway
3. The issue should be reevaluated as the area south of Weston
Hills develops.
GVW/cmb
c: Shanrkon Tyree - City of Sagan
Steve Ryan - Lyman Development Co.
TOTAL. P.06
/
REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT
Soo Line Building
Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440
Tel (612) 347-8258 E iVED J^il L L 992
Fax (612).347-8170
Soo Line Railroad Company
January 17, 1992
Shannon Tyree, Project Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
Dear Ms. Tyree:
After a review of the Lyman Development Company's plans for a
portion of Section 36 easterly of Highway 3 and the railroad which
were furnished with your letter of January 8th,, and telephone
discussions with Mr. Ryan of Lyman Development, we have decided
that the major crossings at Gun Club Road and Cliff Road, the
latter which is adjacent to the proposed development, should. be
sufficient access to this area.
Consequently we are not willing to permit an additional crossing
of our right of way at this point. The plans are returned
herewith.
Sincerely,
R. J/. Tait
Manager Real Estate
612/337-7681
RJT/by
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Steve Ryan
Lyman Development Co.
300 Morse Ave.
Excelsior, MN 55331
CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR WESTON HILLS ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July
10, 1990 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, H1
2. Boulevard trees shall be allowed seven feet from the back of the curb.
3. Snow fencing shall be installed around the oak trees located near the pond to
ensure tree preservation during grading and construction. The snow fence will be
inspected prior to the grading permit being issued.
4. Lot 10, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 5 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills
Drive
5. Lot 1, Block 6 and Lot 48, Block 1 shall have driveway access from Stratford Lane.
6. Lot 1, Block 1 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills Court (cul-de-sac).
7. Berming shall be located along Trunk Highway 3.
8. Pond LP-27.1 shall be designed to accommodate a surface area at the NWL of
1.05 acres, a wet storage volume of 5.2 acre feet and a pond storage volume of 8.3
acre feet and a flow out of 4 cfs.
9. The watermain layout for this site shall include a connection to the 12" watermain
at Todd Avenue and S.T.H. #3 and a connection to the 8" watermain 350 feet
south of Cliff Road at S.T.H. #3.
10. The watermain layout that loops through the south portion of the site shall include
a 12" trunk watermain from the Todd Avenue connection to the south property
line at the Weston Hills Drive stub street.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public-right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development or
accommodate*it.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not be released
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City Code and engineering standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to
final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency..
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a
cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding
requirements in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
H. otber
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
plataprv.eon
LTS *2
w ' ~ w = 1
y 4 I '
F cn "{0 ~r ~N ,ri
y E -
o~ ~ s z SR
STREET MAP CLIFF p. RD.
AAR POND _ l
MALLS PARR A
N O ~W. ~ r
R-1
y J /
ZONING MAP Y # -1
fit?
Y a~ ~ ay L`'`7 •
4 = L) 1414ROTZKE
111 23w
p M Da CPO DA
Will w Pf
04
COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP
Oa
. D~
O - lp
> .NaT
,=R[ ROAD f CLIFF ROAD
9
E9
z . F
~r 8 L L t C
7Q >P ^ rNe arnF. _ 1 / ! .yp. NDtSSM L
i~ m -T-- ; -i- i f 1
E's
'a 3E
Aa;
> X1,1 ~ Y1 f / / ~ • 4` ~ Y a ~wi
w0mg
/ / • . 5 N
• ',0; LJ y
-1--71 / f i SN- 'a 1 I c~
1.0
t- {E". '=E P-'-r€_ red j ~ • w ~ - cP
L -t -r / F R i w
i [ff°f • r, irF *o- / °i 6a t I ~e
FFE
cif =i P^ s fr. _ av w C
zLti iC C~~ / a cw A
Y6 P
[t 42~r t t .i / / /Y / Re Ce tN t r.
IN
5 - ~i: f it l`~ L
t
•
tw N c Cel ~ (,71
Y ! E
O R _ie ~4. ~N c
S / / C C r `r
a?~ C r t? IY ~ IeN Ca ~i+I. A I C
N / / ! j fe Via/ ~e
I ~ C t LA /{r.
/ G fNYR° p{ er
S L P t \ t e C v a / ; t~ C f N`
' _ a ~~~R~~~. •MNK aI
is It 8 s R >
=i ' o '<5 §5556 R tea. ->i
Px ~ e :;c X66 k~~b rn -~•.:x~~~~iE"-.
cEi ' m 5:• SS= ~ ~~6 R 666 - - t. 4_ ~.ti(
P s° S S t ~aa=
x»1.11
2 a . 6 t 7 a a to 1 2 2 , s s 7 ° ° /o 12
4/2. IITO
IIw~o, / •
a 17 ~'1 2 a a a I '2 to a
to 20 21 22 22 a
14 29 a 14 6
x 27 11
"'2R
2! a 1 to f
t " ~•1 16 ,a 1
• to \ °I' 6 7 ~0 u. i 1
w.. a \ wr- 12 25 1
25
• Q T ' s ` 27 VMS
a 26 24 QN 24l ° a t7C': •v
a w 11 •1i 7 , 26 4 , w wu w eu{ w /ar
° 27 23 a 2~ 20 to /a ourwT t
'a WALE I"- /0°'
1 T~ \ \ 2 ° 2J 22 21
29 ? \ ,.,:r ,tea/ • , 47
20
29 46
1 \r•\ • ' ao Is 14 43 u__
%
32/ \ la 42
34 41
/
a
35
40
I fi A\~ \ as ? + i
31 39
11 P,16,
~I 1t/ \ 1 i+,t CONTACTS
f N N YMAN DEVE OPMENT
PROBE ENGINEEROIG CO.. INC.
oft O{TIwa N,
rwuua,aa 1
collwuas twlwau.ww ' .i»'~ .w.u ~.•1W.. ;;;A5YUTIL;LALNS
!1 YC'N; • " -;9
1{00 4al 11{. aTH[l. WWYIIIL, Y11Mi[{aL NAT M O{•aooo 'i1^•~»•"1 w~- ['mut a1,.e{or+ 2x.9.01 4
8 3 T T C' c FF nwD-`- r~ F ROAD `
I~L ' LY 1ui
z
^ TAM I MRaa; : ;'~~.~;,IM :'.._r _
.10
, • . ' ' pig' ! •
1~~;'Y~' .H j' L 1
i e, •i- : 1;' , -~%'s' , , ' is
Lft LAW
D,
Q~' -as ~1 t. t
r 1 t ' ; • y „
aa 1011 L4r! ? • ! r••i::
is i - r • ' 0 1'-
watt' ;.:'f,• :j' _a
t' ! 1~~~1• .i .~r' , j r ,,Y\ •_f~+•, till/
m A-1
m
0 T)
ZOZo
-4- Z
V)Z
m fit' ;:r',r / z! tr.. ;f: ` L_ l
Fil
m g ' . J• _ ••,A as , vT ~ R~
I m I r t=
c c Z
°t~ /a
Y•Y a WILL 0a1 11IIt nnbll ,.la • ;
. I~IrW.N: uN/' od1 r r1w1 r wN .w' rNIL,.w
1. r.lu: b a1:.: "r u.n w.°.i`."S•rINN wryl w r'r
Wp N .u• Nur •IW r NN vu W Irw YNN Y IINk t HOUSE TYPES
i• i1 W YNr 1..411 r •W.l W w Ilp..rr•'1 IN Ir W _
- /Ntl I.Y•. ••i NNtW w tr.r.• I4d. Y IIWU.w Y
f. b:,• p:. N.11 r •1w/ rN W 1 .Ip W'N.I rr. ).W W) -f.f.v.r.• . IN.wu . yll Y.ru IM/! !iW/M
N W ( .II Ilq. Y r....111w Irp Yw wNr WNM /dKKr/ !.Y/
IN Nlu Y W L WI'. YNI5 d„ r Irkvl .1.'• .1'• 41 f
,N- W' wNN. w11 Y .'.f. • •r•.. I!N//!/ t/W
YWI r.l 4NY //.l~~ryr1. ddlr IlrfYII W NnY t-•1 / /•,r/+I, I/LIIAW
i• W w N W w,l.r .W Y IIN. W. T • tY '
1. 11 W I:w Illlr WrJ IY,rf NY Y1WN N wt It N• !1/!!/M {JIK
l ///I! /rK
klltf'`w/ hr'IY ~WI'. lk i W ,gl..li. Ml M t /
f I 1•/ Y• /lKl
411 {•'V.. w ///!1/K N/K
_ ::_f ' --~_-r%r 91.T - lu.4u. kI' 4..r.' ~ NIYYq MMf/NW
_ ~ LOT LfGENO
IN Y... r ,lY tw1 ^LLW.-. Ir....... a".
k.& r11NIY•I 15. 5511 • - .
4.11 kr11 IIIrN W_tW 1. r1 w .fl1N. i. 1u.4
wtu. "•~-7 .~~~JJ 1n-.-:w~}l-j~u 4~iY ~1•M .1•yWIIr'N
i1~ -y EJ#; 1.1. , .41.......41.• i'w IIp1e In1 Cp a!.'..
II" rrW rY Mwr~.+"4:•WIN It aNI YI•Y ~
dm.. •...115 uMNlly 1. rrnW,Yr.N.lwµglN -r •.h')•
w1.11. Im .r w u.rlr..
IWb "IY. Nrrw Y 1. .U111 NNW
YnI NJ COT., WI IN0 N:I,I.t Illna •'dvi •wr 11 rr .w.•YI 411.
f.NU: Il f+ll 11.1. 1.YI I.Y. . IN11...• . rk. I.w.r .
2f~! r...1 .r ~ R~r? ~ 1j.
1. Y Nrulr. 0.11 r WINI.I VW WL 4r W I.NY1 YM ~ Y• fk li' yl \
r wpl. '1
1• w. 'W. W :~lw 1 ~.'.r wl~liil 1 Ip 6Y.'i1••'•NY M ,i~6. ~(~.,v ,??d ~f
Iq. Ir.N rlwY ddl r 1yn11N Y . NIIdN rN L \v~`
W Y'p 115•.5 Wl I'.III YI rN.. \
•1l: t...- • •'.N.. .•.i.~'•.w.:W: f. _ d./~_ OYIIYCIIY Y L TWO, 1111111
1'Y a'WrN 1•. 11I~_N.~fr,.. W 5.515 n1 w (p
. •Wliu4iriiu'N.~ ~.ri.." i w~. wu v
V..N .n. ~Y •r..~W.IiY•Y1yNU.1M W4 u...
•N.. kJ Y rr. • ~w.." •1
r • Y.w.i41w...w1WTN u 1k ~ u1 u
NOTES
M+, 1 r ...u ru,•1
i r. sow- ~,1. rNl ~N~4
» _~1 _ _ ~ / ~ ~ Y Oq 7. 4a.-. 1... NN1 'r ~•.~a ..r.. r.ri~.; ~ rrrw..
• "r•' i+C 4r-.• I C ~1r~lq r. gel la~.l.v a:.u ..l ue
••••"L~ ~ - . , ~.'~."~i.v:T . f• 1. J. 1N mrrrtu 2.•11 w .11 p naW Nw. w.Y .w.
:,y~r~v N ~ Y. 1Y. fs w.l N • N s:• a..Y a+ pw..'n.~.N
1: It .n .N ,4
W p KINAV YIIOaYrJ .a. 1'.•50:5 %E-"Y ~ , . . N :J WV•• w. rd
LOT BENCHING DETAIL W {MEET (M1IYICL wIr .V rrn.rw. w
NOT 10 Scala ti nwva a 1~ •J u. yr.u. a t.
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
1. k-w.....a...rc1 •.:~'I..r I..~J Il w.1.~Y,•wirr•
4'al w 1 1•••••5.11 r • u.1..u1 Y` r.. J w.11.
x ..al1.N w..~.. .n I.-•r 1 ku.
1. 1 nJl 4 .Y.w. 1 J •.-ra.5. N L•.
• 1. 'N_e•I Ivll Y. N..J' .Ir.-.. r t.w W nN
T. I •1 v.ll t. u .u.. ...r .+.•a..
• •ML YINEY ION.
EonaY1SIMO (nOln1(1{ PRELIMINARY GRADING DRAINAGE 4
ROpE lLaMM((1 Lano wavlroal • • 4•• AND LYMAN DEVELOPMENT CO.
" K7 1•• Yoke wa.
PC: NGINEERING • EROSION CONTROL DETAILS (1C..{1055 Y1MNl{Ola IIaa1
WESTON HILLS -
COMPRNY, INC. r p•-- I O N. YINN(COra
1000 UI/ 1466 {11(91• "N{VIL1(. YINN(10Ta 11))1 /'1 412•)000
CLIFF ROAD
rri
m
Z f 1 1
GUN , QU6
9 • 4 ~ \
*b Pti -
4L* %
J
/ a wr `cam
Eli-
? / ` • t t" lit
C,~0 ~ . ~ NORTH
SCALE: 1 INCH 30 FT.
` i y 1' 1 / II± •'r~• Est
16
I.1••~.
%
Ile
/ / / e? A i vP II
'lot
J4 lot,
60 - - - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR
44 ~j~Q e V 910 DENOTES PROPOSED GRADING CONTOUR
R.O. DENOTES RED OAK
9q;' B.O. DENOTES BURR OAK
s
Y 6 ss' / w ' S
I,/ S C
i
Lp.27
/
PO D
' ~ : CITY
coww•nwo tweiwau. - DETAIL GRADING .I.,rwtn,aa
ROgE ntwwut w stwo swwroa LYMAN DEV-1 OPMENT CO.
ENGINEERING .Jr~ WESTON HILLS 3"
COMPRNY.. i'i;:?"cti1N1_rc.~ - t.cutlultt. tt,t,
wwo w, ie nt[n, twnlwu?[, wlwMLwTt 66321 M arsooo •,.oo.• eeww reetou
- - - - - - - - - - - -
•,1 ~-r -
,y f- tiC1`:'~ :4Q':•
%
+ : is \ . :jr:; tiv . •.d :•I~::: ail: ::V a/i~:: •1:':'• id'.':• SY~'~~ : I;1;.• • •.1. .
%
S:. S w r r
:•:1 :'::•::•::1'::''r:•iliidlr'r::': ~ :Y:'::•:.:. ~:}rP%:;::•l.~ :.sq....:•: ~ . /
.4'
CUM= MAP
? .i
is ~ •
t~ rY. .QN~'ti
. i•
46 V-41.
.n.
:ta:Q
SIR ISEVE
%
woorom
_ ; AREA SUMMARY
FINANCIAL :I,- Ran.
OBLIGATION _\1 .....m..
1 - - _ ` r1 r, / \ J ,•t'•.. ' • , • = Kam IIJI ACRES
gas .t nom. •.w ACRES
sl
i 1 \ Y}: il•F!1' } 1{11':. {I am. wo.aw.
109" AREA "Ad AGOMA
STORM SEWER TRUNK``]
; a/ssesr US PAM 6L1.I son.
I t / ' { ' - - j t \ \ :'r~l } ..•a 9"AALm UK U" wwl.on.
- 1 1 I I = . / ::ti::1•': t:•:::'.. . s. .nn relur UN /0s. /ww.on
NORM" LM AN" "A" owl.
SERUM" L---_ r• +I--.... `-=~~-----I---• -lam\+ •.'K'.,., ,,,w,,, L/. IOI,.d..
AoAY I I I ~ `.I / ; \ • &Milo sarm Y.PYUwu
1 ) r , , - 1 , I , \ Q/. I.I. I.. n.. all
- --1 1! EKG`, 1 L_- , ~1 / \ li:yp•.;;~ :::~~:::::r
lyl WI M W ..lt+11 Mw/w M W Y.Iliwl .wrl..Ili.tlM !1. \.rt.N \ \ ~ ' • .
'SI.S
YI Wwi V. YNI. Grl1. YttwlM1 I IM 1.1 II IY W I r1/ I I/y .I ;
w tr wW11W; \ .
I.I.I.. .IY .11 .I ll.l wn t/ W IM a Irl. a W ..II.ll .tM..1 PROBE ENOMEERI O CO.A•1C
)•tllw w, l...l.l. 11, Y•.. U, I.ly Wt M W lso.,?..I M W Ybtl., /
wl.ltly, Y. I,•1 W ab{IIa YIIrW f.1.y. wt11 W NI N IW M Itr . ' X .aw MtmL. -.i1 . MM
w~~/wlNw :w.nt~w~w.^ lyr~.wni... Y.llw 39. p w. M. a sue : " LYMAN DEVELOPMENT CO.
/.tt11 YIItW l.wq, .t 5IY lt..,rw IY , 1 .s, w.trlW .wl .I IW, . ` \ • .wpe son 11..1..1
M..ll: {r•wlw•t. w1N wIM .r111WAwl/Wl. Irl. W11.,. \ ~
• IlY M N4 YIbW rlrl..l 1........1Y Iy1 w IW, Y.a. ~ \
• rw M Iwl,
M I- W w IW M W 1.11...1 •Ir•M~.,. Wy. /r. . \
W.w1wYll M IIW M IYlwb1. '
00Mt1i` GINNIE PRELIMINARY PLAT LrMAN DEYELOPIE/!T•CO
ROME .aswwus asws fss.s.oas
IML
ENGINEERING
..laso la .w.m .:1.1
COMPRNY, INC. .Iyl .aA1 W ESTON HILLS "a K amm
1 wMw .....o1A .3Ayin q
.N 01..1 1046 11101011. VAWftU. NOMMU 80351 M IBM 5111110111
Iw
1-; JP-26.3 81.0_
29.1 '.,•,.'iIL.S.-I r
800A.P-262
P-2T.-. JP-26j' t 1' 'f~922.~i
8960 800.0
902.5 818.0 2~
,JP-69 ,to. 1' ~L~ ~l I I I _ \l~?~r~fl2f 3~°'
6 r~
9420 t-? -T.,
952.0 27?o JP'=69.( r'JP-27;1 ~jl~,..?,CF r aril . - tt
908 0:-, 1" 1 I L'n'TQq'S' 1 w"v ~t ~J~,26A`
• 954 01 I ~ i `9/2A' ) crgm.•„' I i 32.0
959.51 i II _ I . ~ 'a e.., i .s ' I ~ ,..1
f,.r
!Ir~:t.;15fi 8 JP-52
-T JP-6f3 862.0 19 O. f!
rnir;-•966.5 ;a;... 1.;"' '•;;r' 824.1 877.0
TI ' ^ Ti'~ i_- i nr 26.0 /
.958.8
iF?~?'.~ -'-1
960,
V.~, l -ply` Ana ,cN T 1TTTf
964.0 r,r F, art LP
al ,
;i LP-611 884: ' T ^„3~r+r? ~N~,
&L__(. r ~t
906. 0 I
7.0 - rtr Z LAKE -891.3
894.0 ,88 4' BAR 18.0 I 1
9 _ /887.0:= Vii. ;FkACL fJ/~17I ! 4~'i '
1 LP'~'>9!~
:887,8. OINK
t LP-46.[ rcNn , s, t 1/ _ 4
993.0 879 8 ~I:~~' 1w LP 64"
~ 4RrA
LP3T ,8817. 894.t~ > hug. P. gI .2•
879.6 90711 / LP-6T
ISTw~ IT1(' D:D 918.5
881.0 L-351 .;.88$.3 l~11 LP•69+~1' t it LP-47 -30 924.0
7g Q - 9900 L 49 ~~1 90Aol 08.3
LP-3 g70.5f;,;r. 87_0 { t LiqL ggft4 1 1 9106 /3.0
B6Q0 188 ..0''
,89~ 53:I~,k},'%t { 9'2I.tl1 7~9 f
18'
tJ 919``''-I I--Lf- _ -
LP-YQQj45
0155~1
18. 5
9 A. 920.2 ti
I °-21 a.' LP-24 9 70 922.5
D 886.0 LP-27 •
922.0 1
N v fir' i '.925.4
I
y' 8 2 900 03 ADD - +t!'~
/ i~T r. T r
'9016 12
9
4 ! 9500
LP66
LP-17
9
93 W~-4128.70
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT
MAP
CITY OF • .
EAGAN ' /¢7•
January 21,1992
To: Eagan City Council, Advisory Planning Comnission, and Parks and
Recreation Department
Subject: Weston Hills Addition/Lyman Development located east of
Highway 3 and south of Cliff Road in the east half of Section 36
Dear Members,
As Eagan residents living near the proposed Lyman Development we
would like to point out our basic concerns. We believe the following
points contain important information that you must take into account as
you review this development. Please consider the following information
before making your recommendation/decision.
1. Impact to the existing pond on the southwest corner of the
development.
- The existing pond maintains its water level solely from Spring
melt down and runoff from a large portion of the Behr property. The
preliminary plan for the development shows that the developer will
direct all surface runoff water to a proposed pond on the north side of
tht development . As a result, the south pond will dry up. This will
cause:
* a disruption of present wildlife which includes Canada Geese,
mallard ducks, woodducks, egrets, pileated woodpeckers, bobwhites,
pheasants, deer, raccoons, muskrats, fox, opossums, ermine and many
others;
* the death of the oak trees adjacent to the pond because their
shallow root systems will not be able to withstand the stress brought on
by the lack of water. This is evidenced by dead oak trees on the east
side of the pond which died as the water level receded;
* the devaluation of our property values because of the damage to
the wetland/pond areas, the wildlife and the scenery which is critical
to the quality of life in our rural area and.affects our property
values.
2. Substantial increase of traffic for the Cliff Road/Highway 3
intersection and a hazardous outlet on to Cliff Road.
- The current volume of traffic at the Cliff Road/Highway 3
intersection already creates a dangerous situation, especially at rush
hour. The development on the west side of Highway 3 has already
complicated the traffic at this intersection, but the proposed
development will contribute much more traffic congestion , as the vast
majority of the residents will exit the development and head west,
directly into the already congested intersection.
- The installation of traffic lights may help the problem but the
lights would also disrupt the flow of, traffic on Highway 3, complicate
the railroad crossing, and create a stacking problem as residents exit
the development.
- The railroad crossing creates a hazard for this intersection
with the current levels of traffic. The hazard will be significantly
greater with the increase of traffic from the proposed development.
Especially since the outlet onto Cliff Road is the primary and perhaps
1.
only outlet that will be used. This may also have adverse effects on
emergency vehicles.
- The Cliff Road outlet itself will be peculiar and perhaps unsafe
because of the very great difference in elevation between Cliff Road and
the land the proposed development would occupy.
3. Proposed road designs for future connections and development
including traffic flow into and out of the proposed development.
- the Weston Hills Drive stub street connection for "future"
connection to Gun Club Road jeopardizes the southern property owners and
threatens them with increased assessments, property taxes, possible
property condemnation and destruction of nearly 2500 evergreen trees
- stubs leading into Inver Grove Heights may not be usable because
the zoning there does not provide for dense, urban type development.
Plans to use these stubs may be unrealistic.
4. Increased traffic on Farm Road will require additional road
maintenance. Currently road maintenance is provided by the adjacent
property owners. Who will maintain this road when the traffic on it
increases as the number of residents in the area increase?
T`,1& developer has not taken into account the surrounding
Zoning of Inver Grove Heights. There are no "transitional" lots, only
small lots adjacent to 2.5 acre lots. Inver Grove Heights has been
u!.;tilling to change their zoning to accommodate previous high density
developments and is riot proposing lo do so at this time.
6. Unsupervised children playing near the railroad tracks possess
a potential safety hazard usually found in industrial and inner city
a1'ea .
7. Increases in assessments and taxes may cause some of us to be
u!,a'_hle to stay on our property. Why should we have to pay this price?
We: didn't choose to live in an urban development.
We don't consent to having our privacy infringed upon by the
people who will walk around our properties, ponds, and wetlands
believing it to be part of a nature preserve, park, or open recreational
area.
9. We are uncomfortable with the increase in crime and vandalism
that comes with high density developments.
If you would like further information regarding our concerns
please call me. I am the spokesperson for our group of concerned
residents.
Sincerely,
Michael J. rattalone
637-153S days
452-7740 nights
To: The City of Eagan Planning Commission
From: Residents of Inver Grove Heights living
near the proposed Weston Hills development
January 21, 1992
We are opposed to any development in southwestern Inver Grove Heights
that would result in a density greater than the currently zoned and
planned 2 1/2 acres per lot. If the developers of Weston Hills are
corr,idering a continuation of their development into Inver Grove Heights
in order to improve the economic feasibility of their development, they
Will ne&d to reconsider their plan. Inver Grove Heights has
hi-;toricully and is currently opposed to any such development in this
part of the City. The residents are adamantly opposed to such
development and support the Mayor and council in their efforts to
maintain orderly development in this section of the City. Those of us
who live in the surrounding areas have no intention of allowing a
development allowing densities greater than 2 1/2 acres per lot and/or
sewer alnld water assessments to be placed in this area. The developers
may wish to save themselves some time and effort by checking into the
success of previous developers in this area that attempted to develop at
densities greater than 2 1/2 acres per lot.
Sincerely,
Inver Grove Heights residents
]iv.ing near the proposed Weston Hills development
cc: Lyman Lumber Company
/5 .
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
REZONING, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
(WEXFORD ADDITION)
APPLICANT: DAN DOLAN DEVELOPMENT INC
LOCATION: THE NW ' OF SECTION 28 AND OUTLOT B
THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PD R-4 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - MULTIPLE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17,1992
COMPILED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been received by the Community
Development Department requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for 34.19
acres guided for D-III and 1.91 acres guided D-II to D-1, a Rezoning of 36.1 acres from PD-
R4 (Planned Development-Multiple) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat of 65
Single Family lots.
BACKGROUND: Eagan 40 Limited Partnership has owned this property since the 1970's.
Development was postponed due to I-35E alignment decisions. The current zoning of PD
R-4 allows for approximately 338 multi-family units. There have been proposals by at least
three potential buyers to construct apartments. The most recent was Trammel-Crow's
Stratford Oaks. It is the developer's opinion that apartment construction is not feasible in
the foreseeable future. This, coupled with the City of Eagan's desire and efforts to down
zone R-4 (multiple) property is the developer's reason for requesting the proposed rezoning
and platting at this time.
The developer, Dan Dolan Development Inc., has been developing, marketing, and
managing residential properties since 1979. One of the major Dan Dolan developments is
the Evergreen Community located in Woodbury, Minnesota consisting of 408 single-family
homes and 135 townhouse units with prices ranging from $190,000 to $400,000.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed project site is located south of County Road 30
(Diffley Road), west of Thomas Lake Road, north of Baylor Court and Clemson Circle, and
east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Zoning of the surrounding properties is Agricultural
across Diffley Road to the north, PD R-4 to the east in Boulder Ridge Addition, PD R-2 to
the south in the additions of Thomas Lake Heights 2nd and The Trails of Thomas Lake, and
R-4 and RB (Roadside Business) to the west. Currently the site is zoned PD R-4,
inconsistent with the single-family use proposed. The proper Rezoning application has been
filed with the City to allow an R-1 Single Family zoning district. The City's Comprehensive
%5l.
Land Use Guide Plan map indicates D-11I (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units/acre) completely
surrounding this project site. Outlot B, Thomas Lake Heights Addition (1.91 acres), is
guided D-II and the remaining 34.19 acres are guided D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12
units/acre). The proposed density of the plat is 1.80. An amendment to the plan is
therefore necessary and has been applied for with the filing of the Preliminary Plat
application.
COMMENTS: It is the developer's intention to take advantage of the natural amenities and
create a real sense of neighborhood privacy and security. To do this, he feels it is imperative
that Wexford have only one entrance. They will also be screening heavily from all adjacent
properties. The 65 lots will likely be developed in three phases beginning at Thomas Lake
Road and working to the north and west. The lots, as proposed, range in size from the
largest of 55,764 square feet to the smallest of 12,027 square feet. All lots meet or exceed
City size and setback requirements. The proposal features three cul-de-sacs: Wexford
Court, Wexford Way, and Wexford Circle. Each will have heavily landscaped islands.
Access to the site is from Thomas Lake Road where a landscaped entrance median on
Wexford Way will be located. The developer will establish protective covenants and
restrictions and a homeowners' association. All homes constructed will submit to an
extensive architectural review and approval by the developer. The anticipated sale prices
of homes in Wexford will range from $175,000 to $225,000. It is the developer's intention
to proceed with land development as soon as weather conditions will allow in the spring of
1992.
PARKS & RECREATION: The recommendation being made by the Parks and Recreation
Department to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission for their
February 6, . 1992 meeting is for a cash parks dedication and a cash trailway dedication.
/S
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted
with the application shows cuts of 14 feet and fills up to 30 feet. The grading plan proposes
to protect a majority of the trees around Pond BP-53 which is located in the center of the
site. Also, trees along the south property line and the wooded area around Pond BP-24
along the north edge of the site are shown to be protected.
The grading plan shows proposed Wexford Way draining towards Thomas Lake Road on
the east half of this site. On the west half of this site, Wexford Way will drain to the north
to the end of the cul-de-sac. At the low point of the cul-de-sac, an emergency overland
overflow route shall be provided to Pond BP-5.3. This emergency overland route allows
overflow water to drain overland in between the houses and to the pond during an extreme
rainfall event.
The proposed storm sewer that will serve this site will direct the majority of the site
generated storm water runoff to Pond BP-5.3. Areas of the site that will not drain to Pond
BP-5.3 include a 1.3 acre area of backyards along the southcentral portion of the site which
drain overland to Pond BP-5.1. Also, a 1.8 acre area of backyards along the southeast
portion of the site will drain overland to Pond BP-5.2. Both Ponds BP-5.1 and BP-5.2 have
storm sewer outlets that are a part of the City's public storm sewer system. On the north
edge of this site is a backyard area of 1.8 acres that will drain overland to Pond BP-24 which
has an outlet on the City's public storm sewer system that connects to the Diffley Road
storm sewer system. Pond BP-5.3, which will receive approximately 27.4 acres of drainage
from this development, currently does not have an outlet. The preliminary drainage plan
shows an outlet that will be provided which connects to the existing 12 inch storm sewer in
Thomas Lake Road. All of the above mentioned ponds outlet to Pond BP-4, a stormwater
basin on the north side of Diffley Road.
The_ developer has identified on the preliminary grading plan the large oak trees at the
bottom of Pond BP-5.3. A 22 inch oak is at elevation 900.2 and this appears to be the
lowest oak tree around the pond. The normal water level that is shown at 899.5 should be
an elevation that protects the oak trees around the pond provided the pond outlet pipe is
constructed and functioning properly. The final grading plan shall provide a minimum of
3.8 acre feet of pond storage volume to handle the 27.4 acres of direct drainage to the pond.
At the intersection of Wexford Way and Thomas Lake Road, catch basins shall be added
to intercept the runoff from Thomas Lake Road,. Wexford Way and from the island on
Wexford Way. These catch basins will connect to the existing 12 inch storm sewer in
Thomas Lake Road.
The final grading plan shall comply with the City's requirements for minimum and maximum
slopes, protection of adjacent properties, construction of temporary and permanent
vegetation to control erosion and construction of silt fence to control erosion. Special care
shall be taken to prevent erosion along the steep slope in the southwest comer of this site
near Clemson Circle.
/`5g .
WATER QUALITY: This forty-acre single family residential development is located in
drainage basin B which eventually drains to Blackhawk Lake. Blackhawk Lake is designated
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan as one' of six Class I lakes identified to
support direct contact recreation. Blackhawk Lake does not currently meet the water
quality standards necessary to support this use. In addition, on-site ponding is feasible for
this development, so a pond will be required to treat runoff from the site.
The treatment pond shall be constructed to meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
design standards and will have a wet pond volume of 3.2 acre-feet, a minimum surface area
at the normal water level of .72 acres, and a mean depth of 4.4 feet. Consistent with design
standards, a minimum 10 foot wide bench with a 10.1 slope must be maintained around the
edge of the pond just below the normal water level to meet safety requirements. The pond
must also include a skimmer on the outlet, and the inlets should be separated from the
outlet to the maximum extent practicable.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is available in the Boulder Ridge 2nd Addition
development east of Thomas Lake Road. The preliminary utility plan shows connection to
an existing 8 inch sanitary sewer line that is located in the Boulder Ridge 2nd Addition at
Fir Point and Spruce Point. This sanitary sewer connection would require removal and
replacement of Fir Point, which is a private street, and the removal and replacement of
Thomas Lake Road which is a public street.
Sanitary sewer service is also available from an 8 inch line that is stubbed to the north from
Baylor Court. This sanitary sewer line is located approximately 60 feet south of the south
property line of the development and is at elevation 918.6. Both sanitary sewer service
connections would provide sufficient depth and capacity to serve this development.
Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is available from a 12 inch water
main on the east side of the site in Thomas Lake Road, a 12 inch water main along the
north side in Diffley Road, and from an 8 inch water main along the south property line of
the site. The preliminary utility plan is showing two connections to the existing water main
in Thomas Lake Road, and both connections will require the removal and replacement of
Thomas Lake Road. The utility plan also shows a connection to the water main on Diffley
Road that will require the removal and replacement of approximately 180 feet of trailway
along Diffley Road or the acquisition of some easement from the property owner to the
west of this site along the south side of Diffley Road.
The City will require that the sanitary sewer and water lines be installed outside of the
islands to prevent the roots from trees damaging the City's utility lines.
STREET,S/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is proposed from Thomas
Lake Road approximately 550 feet south of Diffley Road. The street system that will serve
this development will loop around the pond located in the center of the site. The street
layout includes three cul-de-sacs with islands and an island at the entrance from Thomas
Lake Road. The minimum street width for the streets around the islands is 28 feet face-to-
face. Also, the islands shall be designed with a minimum of a 25 foot radius, which does
not allow for the "teardrop" design as shown on the street plans.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate adequate
drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by The City's storm water storage volume requirements.
The Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed this preliminary plat and the County
guidelines require dedication of 75 feet of half right-of-way along Diffley Road and
restricted access along Diffley Road.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as
required by the affected agency. Construction of Pond BP-5.3 will require a DNR permit,
and construction along the Williams Bros. Pipeline easement will require a permit from that
agency. Also, any work within the Diffley Road right-of-way will require a permit from the
Dakota County Highway Department.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Wexford Addition
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
Lateral Benefit S.F. $1530/ff 827.43 if $ 12,660
Water
Lateral Benefit S.F. $.069/sf 1.341,648 si(1) 92,574
Storm Sewer
Total S105,234
There are outstanding levied assessments totaling $60,539.54 and pending assessments of
$ 13,641 attached to the parcels.
')Credit will be given for ponding easements if dedicated.
CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR WEXFORD ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 19,
1990 shall be complied with:
Al,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,C3,C5,D1,El,Fl,G1,HI
2. Boulevard trees shall be allowed seven feet from the back of the curb.
3. Landscaped islands shall be irrigated and maintained by the established homeowners'
association. Plans shall be reviewed with the Final Plat submission.
4. Lots 19 and 20 shall have a shared driveway access from Thomas Lake Road.
5. An outlet for Pond BP-5.3, which is located in the center of the site, shall be provided.
6. The final grading plan shall provide a minimum of 3.8 acre feet of pond storage volume
in Pond BP-5.3.
7. The final grading plan shall provide a water quality treatment pond with a wet storage
volume of 3.2 acre-feet, a surface area at the normal water level of 0.72 acres and a
mean depth of 4.4 feet.
8. The development will be responsible for all costs associated with extending sanitary
sewer service to this development.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Basements and Rights-of-Wav
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development or
accommodate it.
3.. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
-service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not be released
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City Code and engineering standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be instafled under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to
final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency..
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a
cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding
requirements in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
H. ter
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning-Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
plataprv.con
LTS #2
W
SK LN.
r
MENVOL
Q ~ yr 2 NE~NE R t ~
o r N 1'
T IL
Cl
11 cr E NE
STREET MAP
~ M.
CAN LA CT. ST
r M IiSTL~ / ;
CIA.
z'W'
Q ~W L Vb
a <t a ! P
MOMK'
G4'
L?• SW
TRAIL
DR
LA.
NLLWNN
R9
G17 7j
ZONING MAP
77
-An
``'nc
- ' ~4MC7W5 LME -
•\iA_ Y~IIk
04
A•
Li Nis Dal
w
rt
COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP
Da - OJ
DJ '04 i ?F ? FF
t
lid
iiII11III11E!It{ Ii I 1•~
Jill I
i '110
I
W~ ~1 l,~ Is~i ii?{I
W ~C z I fill { I{ 1
z
o
per, z f = 1t It tv
• j I w
w s
• I 1
/taO -
DIFFLEY ROAD
WEXFORD
? ? u t ADDITION
0~ Dan Dolan Development, Inc.
? . V 41n
OWN
441
~ 0 o f ~
Ci ?
LD ?
aoo
? o
O
O
F-1 w EXF
Q
EJ ? ?
N
,yI<
I<a .1 C4
I\\ 1 I
Aft
/ 111\I~r/ /1 \ \ -1
- c ~ / \\111 { \ ~ ~ \ \
01
z If j\\w\~e ~l \\~\t \ hl i \1111 11 1 C I 1 \III
\ Lu L\\\\ I / - "7~ ` \ \ \1\\ 1 . I~ _ =c; y/ IIII
~i Ili\\`~\\\\ \ \r\ \ Ic -
\1\\~y \ \ \ 111 \~f`-.- UI \
\ lu \ . hn \1 11 III s . ~
NIx
\ \ /!U % 1111! 1\\ I IT+ u %
\ \ \ \ \ 1 //i// _
f \1\ , ~ 11;1\\\ / iii I)(l1 Ji / -
Il II\ I~I / ' \ ' \ lillif/// / dji~ 1
1 y ~I / /j/yip I = I I 1 1
I I I I - I \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ / / / y . ' \ U ~ i / / / / / ? / / / ~ ~l 1 Rrl I \ 1 I
'AV IN
Ill,„ ' / lI 1111 I I~ II III \ _ , J ' /p / I'l I \ \ \
I / 1/I III 1 / \\~//Ipl I /I I i- \ \
~I =I \ \ ~r I It
S\\\ ail 1 \ \~I~ ;I f
IN.
III / \ \ I \
lit
J /i l \ Y~I I.I=11 \ !
IN,
lit III td Z7
1\\ \ l\ \ \ • 1 -~c•~' I I \ I I - r
1
r
f ~
\1\i l \ \\W \
1\\ 1~ f I
`l V lcs f
1 C'LVj\ \\?1r 1 _ \U
It 1 I~\\\\ Tv\\\ L\\\\ ` - \ all
111I11f~~\\\~\\\\\\ - \z~ \ `ice
1111
\a\ \ \ U \ \ 111 \ Ilk
\ \ T//%~!////~/I! 111 -
111 i / \ ii\\\\\ Y?grr////
II 11 I I 1~/ n\~~ \;iir.~
I II I \\\\\\i\\ \ l11/f~ / / I 1 \ \3~
11111 \ \ / l - \
1 / ~I I ~ v \ \ I )
/ F+~" / / \ I I \ t
\ \ / I \ I
\ 1 I 11 11 !
11 I • i\ if
(I !I \ !I
SMAL
I \ \ \ \ err II I ` \ \
i '
r \ .:&1 M \ \ 1 I
N'5"\\ \ 1 1 1 1 i I \
~4\\ \ )I I i l . \ / I I \ ,
:z..... ,.f in f
N M.Li• ??V V~1~~
~-g• ffEf
I I pi
i~ il!!lj~lJ ! } ! !
~fI
o= a
fit
,,?,'if~j ~ s(~lJ~Ili~~ +eJjllj ~ ~ I~ / / ~ ¦ ~ \ ~ f. i
g„ I / ~ 11\11\
s % \ s L " ; ~\11y11 `
+ • • a cc
1 \ 1
j \,\1\11111\~~ s e b b s i p
, E e e s¦ ~ x
- s ~
- i/ OIffLEY ROAD CO. (RD. #30)
"..ass
:ti v 't : {.;r: • .t•.~ '.lKS,.^M• • ^rti `rrf:: ~ r:-?lrf,,~~^.Ff~7.~~.~::.r :'I z ~
• ~bFW.:'. ; f::;i;. ^ISrr.,~• J': • vdt.~`1'' ~'.!rr,., it ~ ( ~ t .w.
/ '~f :•r~ t , • . .r..r •••ryr' .;a:~ r'• 1' 2e.~~ I i -1"•,~+': ~i'se~.C:{
~ r~ : f. • .•r: ^,'a~r,: • ti • .•,r:;.••:k••':;:;.4}::. '~v ~ • •f'.•:~:~.~if•~~••'.;. ~'•r:.i!. I ~ i --•1
-L- J
"SAS`. \
. y.: r~r tr::• ii`'. J 'f``rc,.~;. Ctttt~
:'t : :•..•:k:.rF/.;r::r ' .r ~;r~~ //,~.~.,~4~~kfi: \ . -:r. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION
b STORM SEWER TRUNK
/ ~M•~'.~•':'C'u. ' .•%..•'Y. ~ '"f~ :~:~'~!;F 'yam •~;~1, '\L`~• ~ \
.t: 'f'r,.•; i /+i•:~ r~+ .~r~r> ~hr;.; r: f t?~ ~:a~ * LATERAL BENEFIT WATER
.':;:~i' i:j :;i: ~•i,,;:;., ~:,~,~,~7+~•••~~ .-r ~ is ' i''•:.~ •4;r:=•• ~':ii:•'•~~'•~ '?t•:
' / :{':r'`••' ! : : ':;x • Vie.' : ~
UN!
. _ .jr' fit' Y'_'\ ~~::YY`: / . ' ; i. ; i Y f?. tt •'~t \
/ ti ,•rti7,?'ii;',~ti,+r,.~.~~'~ ~,«..si~ -'{~ti• x .g,: .t:.;x. •'Y'••~1~~~ . r rl; .{~~~G: ~ Q~ 4~
.,5,.~i ir. :v • ~ti. ~`v~r , f:' •it ;Y;:~i:C. „C~'tt \ .•I . \
••r:; -r ; • • .w ~:,~yi' '~,'"ti n ,r'•tiy"`e•,r~ • ' .;7 :•''`~.~•r ..1 .Yt Ki X , :Lt. ' ,.?t. Z,~s1: \
- I•.~• !1!F~.;i;:~ ij;=y1. tta::t ::/~7~;{{:/1r-;`rii1; :7~+.: ;:~1:'(' • l ) ,T~~•:.
' 1;~; r''r.:.:ti , :y:. ' •;S;:y, . v: S•' _ ,,C :tom;: ; . ~;h ~ ' •:f ; r.. , .
:~f i''::~. _ '1~::'~ ::;ire , f. , a• 1: , ~ : t •t• t.. yy~.(~
:~is:•. J: ' • ~:k;. •.t,:. Yom, • :'t•
•Y.: J7:':::' 111.•(: •'I.' •:11\;::^• /
f• : ? .;z<:• f ;r• : ' X ~,;,r:: v;:;`::~`~t;• : i:~:})• rK~~:; , ~:~R`~~}t :,~:t:••' .~.t:••'
••'~•Y:N' ,,R;.%,: J. •:7,'P,:'•:f:M .;Jt .;.i,`.YJ'f.1's--',.,~; :'X:.'iC•Y.•: ~r~.~L ;:.~1 ~i0~5~.
mw DOL. O[VuO U,' .4. — PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 4
- - _ WEXFORD
rryrt~r^,~r A I
j1~, r-';--. - ,1.~" Vi: 834.0 !
P IITY
BLACK117ty. 2 1K~ ntiLL !lt 3;-1 -i
?P-37 PARKBO/.
903.E
! 792.3,_. % ~ 1!•x111'`
J ~',!I = ,f .;11 i,~c;•_ i l.4.~r. BP=291
/so97.ttt
r ; I! I` r f1~1 , ~1~• ~f !,I ~~/B.0 l:!1_LLL)~~. ~1I± r ..lii. ~ISF •i
sa
1 1, 1 , BP-29.1~_ L f
1
9f6.0
xr 1 i S T 9200 . 1
t AP2` BP-2B
662.6 N
868.0
? 13p- 3-
886881772 895.2 I CrT SIP=36; \
l1-!n t , J l to a (~T0.6 ;JP,35 864.8 JPL7
s ~~~~f!iatJJ~(~~ tr ti °L.BP-3 ~P'-37r; 1 t~ ss9.4 972F7, 858:4
ll 8 7 a 6 2,
889.9
905.2
1 1 !.N ~P-35 _ SCrOw 8 C JP 48 f t a I,: L..IVliAL! 908.0 _.._F ! 74A::' ~I-
AP 4~~+. i ~1, `1 A-9+ 920.2 N , = X47,
886.3 BP 25 / 874.2 tli } 1.
924.0 8906 e-s BP2 , . f,
AP-7.1 927.2 886.5 882,1 ; : f( " ' ' LP-63.1
AP-35 i;-4,"3'2 920.5 4 AP-•7. '2O ri i J''' LP X880.6 94.5 { 5.1 55.3 FB
886.0 / 0 " .5 c ti .0 7 "85B.3y`_
81 ~24 ~u_•~,`4'a_'a '1,...,)LBTP45{ -i
11 .A~,i: r a 1LP-51 920.0 +,yY t l BT i r h , . LP 44 I
t~'frt e, it
82. 93 .01
_ 856.5
A P -7 891.0 Q . _-1 ~I r 71 •,,.'1, ,
889.4 AP-2 1 Z f • -p
X93.9 ~ ~`O1f1 x887.1" LP~42 19
0. c J t::
B9z,Qj JJJ 840.5
/11
BP-23 1 1• r 1 ~ - 848.Q~ ` f' j Iz~
T a „ T.i[ 931.3 j TH A, p'I `
P-9 r~ 32 3 ) X r 982:9. ~o f , , l 27~ j.. _
P-12 `wry :9I .5- I I -r +Gn LS~27
. 893.3 ~r h!'L BP-6 BP=~6 ? .u. .
•9040 •+;~ti 1• 882.0:
~gg9 g i
2 -AP-43. 8P-10 9101 L.5=3:_
:9 0 909.88-9.: u uY6m r• LASEMiNT
2 _ o 8-e- BPgg-16- BP-1 4'""" -
;ii.': t+b:its;:i'•.; f kT,} 8 $4l' "9 b . 190/ r ai. 899.Q
Q8.
01.
BP-2 ti 1 1<,9 /
•916 0 "1 St/~,g r 8/ f0::: I {5y
AP-23 oAv'
889.3 27•BP-8 BP-II• ; 15,1'i
p , : ,l 7 4,
9qQ APn4Q ,1..915I9 0 ,1int1~ 4s. B-n9052 •~~d p :r~ j
AP-11 912.1 _ ~5 t920Q! it- , I r ` , r 48•~Q61P P=55
89 r.9P-21 1:~hc'Y?fiila'i SAFAR
93r _`~C nr ti'; 8P- =
P-22-:` AP 2 g-8R-39 , li2f ,!aF
S _ _ 1fi 26.0 ; . : 929.9 1..T' K ~EN E . __l_~~ o t
- x-12 r
-92T.5.=-
11Qto 908.a p' 3 1- 1
93 50111C
~ 9/4.0-864aBP-:34
AP- la BP- 2 : ;337 9~~`; Vii- ~~i _O 986.0
921.6 ;9339•' .~`:~Zt'~aj ip
y , 937.9 ti r iFlr .B t b • LR•5,Q7~ LS.-21 It2 is - ; : I i
ray i ~ /fM~lf' ~ H /l4211jC~' 34 42 r1 91 0 ~ _ ~ , ~ r'A,iK`'tL''ri 1
!t' , 1. .t GJLF {
'e. !r
2 l t ~y-rµp. f rf 1 ! lj ; Ci•u„~E 1
AP-1 1. . BLP-6 xI 1 1 ap~7
5 A -48 (r- tl J il/'~!~ ! ~ pay n i 1 ! ;
r 8,8 920.6 .
FIGURE No. 17
SEWER LAYOUT
STORM
MAP
CITY OF
EAGAN/
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT
(HAWTHORNE WOODS ADDITION)
APPLICANT: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: NE QUARTER OF SECTION 25
(P.I.D. #10-02500-022-30)
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 16, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Rezoning of approximately 48 acres from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R-1)
and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 97 lots on approximately 51 acres. Three acres of this
area are presently zoned R-1. The proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Land/ Use Guide Plan designation of D-II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units/acre density). The
site is located south of Diffley Road, west of Highway 3, north of Autumn Ridge Addition,
and east of Dodd Road.
BACKGROUND: The three acres currently zoned R-1 are part of Outlot D, Autumn Ridge,
which was platted in October 1990. The remaining 48 acres is unplatted property.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The topography of this site is rolling with slopes ranging from
gentle to severe. The site vegetation includes mature woodlands, secondary woodlands, and
several cultivated fields. Generally, an east/west line drawn through the middle of the
property would separate the significant tree growth on the north from the secondary growth
to the south.
COMMENTS: The developer held a neighborhood meeting at Pinewood Elementary School
on January 15, 1992. Approximately 35 residents attended the meeting. Issues discussed
included drainage, density, grading, access, utility extensions, lot prices and timing. City staff
attended the meeting and were available for questions. The applicant is proposing a phased
development that will include 41 lots on approximately 20 acres in Phase I; 56 lots on
approximately 27 acres in Phase II; and an Outlot of approximately four acres as Phase III.
Ideally, the developer envisions the following time frame: Phase I in 1992; Phase II in 1993;
and Phase III in 1994.
The City Code requires an 85' minimum lot width at the setback line and a minimum lot size
of 12,000 sq. ft. The lots range in size from 12,072 sq. ft. to 42,530 sq. ft. The average lot
size is 17,636 sq. ft. As proposed, all lots meet, or exceed City performance standards of
lot width and area. Because Phase I only has access to and from the site from Hackmore
Drive, a Variance to the 500' cul-de-sac length is necessary. When Phase II occurs and
connection to Diffley Road (County Road 30) is provided, all cul-de-sacs will meet the 500'
requirement.
The developer has proposed the extension of Hawthorne Woods Drive and connection with
Diffley Road with Phase II of the development. Dakota County has reviewed the general
vicinity and has agreed to allow an access to Diffley Road provided the location is close to
the midpoint between Highway 3 and the existing Countryside Drive access to Country
Hollow Addition. The proposed intersection of Diffley Road and Hawthorne Woods Drive
appears to meet this criteria.
The developer plans on a limited number of builders for this project. In addition, some of
the northern cul-de-sac lots may be left for individual grading for a custom lot/house. Due
to the range of grades, certain areas will be conducive for full walkout houses, while others
will accommodate only a rambler style.
Tree preservation should be achieved with a physical barrier. Protection of trees to be saved
during site grading should be enclosed with snow fencing, or other suitable material. Also,
boulevard trees will be allowed 7' from the back of the curb.
PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending to the Advisory
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at its February 6, 1992 meeting that
this proposal be subject to a cash park land and trails dedication, an amendment to the
Comprehensive Trails Systems Plan to include a sidewalk along the south side of Hawthorne
Woods Drive, a 10' wide trail bench north of the south R.O.W. of Hawthorne Woods Drive,
pedestrian ramps at all street intersections, tree protection plan to be approved by staff and
that the developer work with City staff to determine if the proposed storm sewer pond could
be moved off-site.
/(~Q .
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The site contains rolling terrain with
woods on portions of the site as well as open areas used for agricultural purposes on other
portions of the site. The preliminary grading plan shows cuts of 13' and fills of
approximately 12'. The grading plan concept proposes to construct streets on the hills so
that the walkout house styles can be sloped back to the ravines in the backyards.
The western 5.7 acres of the site is proposed to drain to the west to Pond JP-68. Pond JP-
68 is included in the City's Stormwater Management Plan and the Pond currently has a 15"
outlet that drains north across Diffley Road to Pond JP-26, located within the Country
Hollow development.
Approximately 10.2 acres of the Autumn Ridge Development to the south will drain
northerly to the Hawthorne Woods Development. Therefore, the storm sewer system
designed by the Hawthorne Woods Development conveys the stormwater runoff from the
Autumn Ridge Development through this site.
The easterly two-thirds of the Hawthorne Woods Development is proposed to drain to a
storm sewer system flows in a easterly and northerly direction. The preliminary grading plan
shows construction of a stormwater pond in the northeast corner of this site. This Pond
would be designated as Pond JP-26.1 as shown on the City's Stormwater Management Plan.
This pond currently is undeveloped and does not have an outlet. An outlet shall be
provided for Pond JP-26.1 that would convey the water north across Diffley Road. Pond JP-
26.1 shall be designed to handle 59 acres of direct drainage area which will include 10.2
acres from Autumn Ridge and approximately 11 acres located north of the Hawthorne
Woods site in the southwest comer of Diffley Road and Highway 3. The 59 acres draining
to Pond JP-26.1 will require a storage volume of 5.3 acre feet and have outlet control of
13.2 cfs.
The preliminary grading and drainage plan shall be revised to include catch basins in the
backyard areas when the flow during a 5 year rainfall event reaches 4 cfs or more. The
extra catch basins and storm sewer will help to prevent erosion and backyard drainage
problems.
The site must be in compliance with City requirements for minimum and maximum slopes.
The final grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall include protection of adjacent
properties, construction of temporary and permanent vegetation to control erosion and
construction of a silt fence to control erosion.
WATER QUALITY: This 51 acre single family residential development is located in the
upper reach of drainage basin J. About 5.7 acres on the west side of the development will
drain to Pond JP-68, a recreational class pond designated for wildlife habitat. The
remainder of the site will drain to the north to Pond JP-26.1. All of the site will generate
runoff that will eventually reach first Fish Lake, then Blackhawk Lake. Fish and Blackhawk
Lakes are two of six Class I lakes identified in the City Water Quality Management Plan
and are intended to have good enough water quality to support direct contact recreation.
Neither lake currently meets the water quality standards set for it in the plan.
/
The City will construct off-site to the north of the development several wet ponds to treat
runoff from most of the development. The developer will, however, construct a small
settling basin contiguous with JP-68 that will partially treat runoff entering JP-68 from
Hackmore Drive. The effective surface area and wet volume of this pond is estimated at
.1 acres and .15 acre-feet. The remainder of the water quality obligation for the
development will be met with a cash dedication, reduced to reflect the credit for the small,
pond at the southeast comer of JP-68.
Using the method outlined in the City Water Quality Management Plan, the Cash
dedication for the development is as follows:
Pond Surface Area Requirement
(.93 ac. - .1 ac.) x $16,330/ac. _ $ 13,553
Pond Volume Requirement
(4.6 af - .15 af) x 1613 cu. yds./
of x $2/cu. yd. = 14,255
Total Cash Dedication = $ 27,908
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available in
Hackmore Drive to serve the first phase of this development. The first phase will consist
of 41 lots along the west portion of this site. The 56 lots in the second phase of this site will
be served by a sanitary sewer line that will drain northerly through unplatted property north
of this site and then across Diffley Road. The sanitary sewer line must also be extended
across unplatted property north of Diffley Road and then connect to the existing sanitary
sewer in the Country Hollow Development.
This development shall petition the City to construct the sanitary sewer outside of the plat
that will serve phase two. The sanitary sewer in the east portion of the Hawthorne Woods
Development will also serve approximately 20 lots to the south in the Autumn Ridge
Development.
Watermain of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to this site in Hackmore
Drive. The preliminary utility plan shows an 8" watermain looping through -the site on
Hawthorne Woods Drive that would also connect to the watermain in the Autumn Ridge
Development. The City's Water Supply and Distribution Plan shows an 8" trunk watermain.
looping through this development from Hackmore Drive and then to the south through the
Autumn Ridge Development, connecting to the existing 8" watermain in Atlantic Hills Drive.
The Water Supply and Distribution Plan shows the north line of this plat is the pressure
zone boundary in between the intermediate and high pressure zones. Therefore, any.
connections to the north would require a pressure reducing station to be added if the
watermain is to be extended to the north of this plat.
Sewer and water services were not provided to Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 3 when Hackmore
Drive was constructed. Therefore, this development shall be responsible for connecting to
the 8" sanitary sewer and 8" watermain in the street and extending services to those 3 lots
and repairing Hackmore Drive to its original condition.
Sanitary sewer and water service shall be stubbed to the properties to the east of the
Hawthorne Woods Development. The sewer and water stubs will allow the existing houses
along Highway 3 to have sewer and water service.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is readily available from
Hackmore Drive to the west. The preliminary site plan shows a connection to Hackmore
Drive. Access is not being proposed to connect to Highway 3 with this development. In the
second phase of the Hawthorne Woods Development, the connection to the south will occur
with the development of the second addition of Autumn Ridge. The preliminary site plan
also shows a possible street layout that would connect Hawthorne Woods Drive to Diffley
Road. The developer shall petition the City to construct Hawthorne Woods Drive outside
of the plat. The alignment and the extension of Hawthorne Woods Drive to the north to
Diffley Road should be located approximately half way between Trunk Highway 3 and
Countryside Drive according to the Dakota County Highway Department.
The preliminary street layout plan shows an island to be constructed at the intersection of
Hackmore Drive with Hawthorne Woods Drive. The island will be approximately 100' long.
Temporary cul-de-sacs will be required at the north end of Rosemary Court and also at the
east end of Hawthorne Woods Drive at the end of the Phase One construction. Also, a
temporary cul-de-sac will be required on the east end of Eastwood Court at the east end of
the Phase Two construction.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required to provide
appropriate ponding easements for Pond JP-26.1. to incorporate the required high water
level and storage volumes of this pond. Also, the final plat shall dedicate ponding easement
over Pond JP-68. This development shall be responsible to dedicate or financially guarantee
the acquisition costs of easements and right-of-way for street and utility construction outside
the boundary's of the plat.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as
required by the affected agency. Pond JP-68 is a wetland on the Corps of Engineers
inventory of the National Wetlands. Therefore, any construction work along Pond JP-68 will
require a Corps of Engineers Permit. Any platting along Trunk Highway 3 will require the
approval of MnDOT.
1?/.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Hawthorne Woods Addition
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. $.069/sf 1,638,567 sf $113,061
Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. $720/lot 97 lots 69,840
Water Trunk S.F. $750/lot 97 lots 72.750
The parcels have levied assessments totaling $199,391. At this date, there are no pending
assessments on these parcels.
CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HAWTHORNE WOODS ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July
10, 1990 shall be complied with:
Al,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,C3,C5,D1,El,Fl,Gi,H1
2. A tree protection plan shall be provided and approved prior to issuance of grading
permits.
3. Boulevard trees will be allowed 7' from the back of the curb.
4. The Hawthorne Woods storm sewer system shall be. designed to handle the runoff
from the 10.2 acres of the Autumn Ridge Development to the south.
5. This development shall be responsible for the cost to acquire easements and
construct ponding and storm sewer pipes related to the construction of off-site,
downstream storm sewer and pond construction.
6. The final grading and drainage plan shall include catch basins in the backyard
areas when the surface water runoff during a 5 year rainfall event exceeds 4 cfs.
7. The developer will construct a 0.1 acre pond at the NWL with 0.15 acre feet of
wet storage volume along the southeast side of Pond JP-68.
8. The utility plan shall include an 8" watermain looping through the site from
Hackmore Drive to the Autumn Ridge connection in the southeast corner of the
site.
9. This development shall be responsible for connecting to the existing 8" sanitary
sewer and 8" watermain in Hackmore Drive, extending services to Lots 1, 2 and
3 of Block 3, and repairing Hackmore Drive to its original condition.
10. This development shall be responsible for stubbing sanitary sewer and water
service to the abutting properties to the east of the Hawthorne Woods
Development.
11. This development shall be responsible to dedicate or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of easements and right-of-way for street and utility construction
of as they extend to the north of the plat to Diffley Road.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development or
accommodate it.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards prior to final plat approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
1?r
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not be released
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City Code and engineering standards.
D. Public laorovepents
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
at a formal public hearing by council action prior to
final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency..
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication .
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a
cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding
requirements in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
H. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
plataprv.con
LTS #2
• ` CIRCLE
STREET MAP P WE Ell
4KES/DE
U " r4RM Mow • MRK
Iz
W r ~ i
a c ~ ; iT
J 1 4F
U FIe
4z F~-
RI
OLE
ZONING MAP1
sor.ra j u 2
rno' ,
~C..~ka~x'#r~! F'"'S-~17 Illy'' ] \ ~ ~ • ,
0.r rs
COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP CPO
PI R
_ ? r :r
w
-i is -ti es = t1 FRiRRRlR R4;iiR":! s ,I~•
3 L s }S is=~t SS i 'RS:I! t . i r-:~
14 if tti:s~tl 4i
Li'sci f #=1 t } f g- i sis ai g at.
! t. ;g S: ! t } 1•iiii'Sgi,F~i: :.}i a ~1rf'".i` ~p ; '
tltslg i~ t i- s ~ !i ~ ta. 'f >
fi = tttl~ ` = i! l~ - # ~ta_:'..' j.l! !,i x_ r _ i:" ~,y f
sit lit i 5i_•jsq ; it j ia~ a sifi;~ it < 1 • S~
i,}p it 7 s ri !r } 1B's-}1 iti~~s}ir•[[ r, ri t.
~ t _}~pp~: Fi3}4 it z a . ,~;i `.-~V . ' i.3• ~ ~
3iit~ii F ~::ar =i t ° 3=l11;}g#!-3 Mali ii _ y-' t t;~~, rf
tiitgst i ll! R }F"'i." f jFs i ggt < % 1 .d icrk'
yel lia: ~ LtFa~~; iF•~1~ ~ 3 ! ]"-i(li~ie! iil}S. ~g > ~ ~ :~.w
F1tfig l+tt R~ f : F =Fi.j4 gi3i4tj}t i 9 p}+-? l,l. •:r >j,~~ lr
t r n :x'L1e d [c !:i i ri:, i
l(- riylr~r ii F ~jF:cs'~i:i~}!s y ?r._•_ . .I. „
N 3~S~is ~F;L1r i~isi-Fe swig L { _ M;1. _
ae}lL-L ! [1 ~ytigl 4~~:~t S•~ii -
"no
~ ~ SAY - ' '
021
all
_ :yr ~ i ~ I i Gym
o_ /Ifl" \ ? ~ `oar } s I i l { _ , . , • r
y I t I
I ~ I jI• 9N
- ~n-;~ 'ter 1'` \ ` j~}______ _ _
~6~7 ~ is ~ [3 , y -IfI ~ •r+
[i 777 i ~ •..r.:.-•~ w r,..
N:ry f
Jr,
3 Bpi 'I7 \ \\6 P }i
~D xst ~R.
• F
rw O a g r~ I ! ~y
ul I R
tt a at ?'a gas awn .a.a ~ CN "y,:,( ~ N
T a~'••7~ n, p A.ai •
1y 7j_ -L--- 1 ~~y • I ` ` tg! RiVo S =W
Lt Vo
E ii M r
w ( c ¦Wr a ~e ! • 9~
° 8 I
'41a N ~Z a
Z is •l, .6 - ~ww nh R
Boll
--------Tim a
L W
22 1
I~ j ~ g: ZIf ZF : !tom ii ilr''~-.. ~~r
` 'f f. fir' "<s
,s .s, se. ,sa• ! r ~ ~ ~ iiii iii
ti < ~ ~ ~ ~ ! as
V1W
IL 31"
~-----d=-- •t -
v I • f ~ r t,., p• E I i ~ `i .
SAINQ
IL N%
I~~ ~E_! EEEEE e
fs .
z . t E, 71 6121g e
f 1 flit ! E ! iEE @!`555g•~~ `
M
r r
Flo
~ i i J yy J i Onrr- r~ I' ~
N I l+dt
MvIL
90 ML
c -V,
~3 e o I ; s,. 2u
w - 9
y
y - li"W 7Yi K°7°p
'r - - - - • a~"asaa ' ' ~ ~
O , I I" I• f j~ .
Of JI ~A ~j/ N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 111111
° ' I Tlli`
I{fit
~ I I i
Rl•E 6t~.EY~~ ~~4AD _.143.PH J* hO1__ _~__--1i._~ ;~7'~ t'~ 1~~ 1~,i 1~,
_ _ . r - 4 Ra• r i. I', r~ 7~ _ _ 1 ` 1 * r • 1 1 r. - 1..,~i r : 1 r 1 to / J / 1?
_.i_ y ~..fi~•~ _ _ S 0 1i ;:1 t~ 1 1 I 1 / 1` J~'_` , 1j
f•' . YY• ' Y' 1 . + fit^ -r; V : 1~•A s` , _ ..r (Y ^t . 1 1~I , Y y)yyy~1 ~rt~ l• i,. `•1 v
, 1 a..~ n'~i Y,O ~+f .~..j T A Y( 1 .yl 11
1e I' • i'_~~~/ 4„I~r~rt~'r `Clf~.l•~'r~
.•~_~.LJ'V'•' li.
_ • , , 1, '44)
Y vt r' \ ; II~; ~+f ti.T. 1 .''ter, r I
, ~ + ? 1 ~ 1 (11{ 0 T~-C
1• VI 1' r k Sr18 1 ! T'ra 'iK•. \ .,r, \ .~y?~~
(,i n }.rte .;Y
\ ~ , .I'~< .a~.. //'rr, ••a r! I ~(I ~ ~.ns• :
11 r '~11 I/ /1 / ' - -1 / / I I;~; F•/.~ _~rl 1\1.1 ;I, > ,
't I 1 ' 1 ~I 1 r J r , . T NI?SE 1 . y PN~SE .2I `„"C`_` ` •I~ \r ` ,t I -_I ' ; ;1,
111 , i I '.1` I ~r r~ 1"G \ 1 II Iria ~IJh.•lr, ; \ \o. \d`'' du t.aT 7
,wwe .r, u ' \ / - - . J _ r 1 d / + TTO r~ 1 - ay,' +
j ~y? s ` w - ' r~ y 1, O
A^ tULlCII•,ORE DRN~'t' /
11, , \ 1 F 11 JI
.•o-.co.a.cn r.w,o.cV..w.` / L ,.1t ~.~'~~1~~ a'yr s< 1+, 11 ~t~>'~I
4~' / \i\`+T 1~. 1 \ • ~ r 1 , `ice! s/ 6I: TI
--a caAT•.r. •TOrw acwac , I `.~.1 ± ~ ,i - ~ l~ , G
Ila
40,a lnw•tw <av,no,. ••.N t 5 K •SIAtY O w1 I ^•.p,_- .Q Knp f ' F , , ' •~llF . r. '
' •M M k. r •u rUt4~. wwl , tits\, a 1 1 1 1 ~ a a t' / r~ f _ _ I K ~mI
4.I.V•w4 wu•,w..a / W ~ / . r - - Kn J nw iwn
J - ~ If p 11 ~k_ / i RIO"~ / . 1•In la nm
mrww.. r,r.•.n•c~r, 's ry + 1 Z (l 5.21 . ? • r iW t " . ~'l«"' IJ'
m.a.r.. wr n nr. r.rru_ v.i+oi:. w,o ~a ~ v f -t,< I ~ ~ ~ s,... T.\ ' '1~ / •/,•{:,r' \ ~ \ .1 Of ~ IIY r
nwrM W Mr• +mrr .IM Ir!•',r,,,rul M't wtrr OI.10 A n.r.c f ~ :r 1' ~ • . IM r• MM Crl1
r. r,',1«.a .
n.. ,l. wn. r.Iwu M ..a. M..a. I r / . 1
1 1
_ con Ilacr...w.+llr..w.w•w~ LVMAN DEVELOPMENT 100 PRELIMINARY GRAD/ PLAN 4 8
'w ^ :+•tll"' SGO MOIISE.„ENUE (PO. Dox 401
I.F.~~ Iiufi' rM!•tfr••nn l7•nr•
•~r 'II•'•i{• u,.S~tYtllW.. ~Yr'` ..~.w„.« w.w. [IlCtIiNM, MINNESOTA SSSSI 14AWnDiM1E WOODS
"'r ro _ - «>•oa wro a.w.• wq, oa. or•• M53 E.GU1, MINNESOTA 5
F'oq h j 1
TZZ
CL
i .`~~y it ! 4 . ~ ~ i ' I / / 1 ' S 1
I\t°i~`;'+ l r•{' ' it - R ri ~ !
N H
>~+-1~ dl t:a I I ~ i+~1~-~~` ~.~~d ~ = _3j- ~ / r~"' ~ ~ - s -_•iF~^~d ~ ~ jo
ce.
92
AL m
1 %'i1 ti I . , , Yf~ 1 x 7` 1 1 n: 1 • r \ ,5, . r
~1(,y r' I % t Tam ~A~~ \ v ~s
21-
11 '~'~f,%A b~~-_ 1. rte`-.~ r iii
j~~r~ ,i : ° ~ ~~L 1 l w~~ ~ ' ~ rya e
r- i IY s
' r1 l:1%l - _ 1~7 1 _~1 iii' r
Tv;l', i•"It' 1t\~ l \ y = r 1r \ _ ~ err / i'
o./-:~~ p"'ail
\QJJ--y.. T i -.tom -1 J-- L
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION Lry ROAD 1[,•1. r.040, II! , 11 T-
I-- I I I I~ I \
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK I •f I - ` I -
WATER TRUNK
AUDITORS Sl8 `iD 47 EAGAN
LIT
! I I [rurw•.orw•«.• wwss.na~o.pvaMnv*krrr I
STORM SEWER TRUNK I I I "
' aassrnarf R[ o NMww= / cam,-Lnow ro o1fF1~. arD t.6r •J
I I SVRVl1 ?ro e?r~Al t I I }i
I f I IPHASE 1PHASEi2 i , _ - I~•
• - - - -
LOT
a•GG•f•~ ;•.kl• PIt~:' ':ti: .ti•::::'ly' : A:: F pp
Sfta •rirl.s . ria!n r..wwr
-X 0
•
S. •:nvtijf' •'twi~' ':Y:' ~sir~ro:: 1 ,
•.n •a•
.;k1;i;Y. ~il•t:ni•d'•' :fi.. PNASE 1 1
r •
war. a•
•M
•ta`~, :ti?t':.:.•.:. : t ti~::f : ~b7•F! . v irl~!!r ' t r
f
.•i~•.•.•: titi• i (.war
IOI NACaCMOlG pRIVC ••'••'w~• _ / •j~s;:t.%.i; 'r /
• Jar. - ~ .~Fiin• :~:.i~ ~ ~ r
arwnr •I,r rl a~•w[Ir Ir 1 A rarwr~l ::i A•T.': •.1lMr • • • ••v: • • /
O , at..aaw rau• a.r rrl r w s
O r.w r ara M s wsnw , o . rN} •:~I: ' -+}(j t w •i 'Ii•:: :r••c • /
.w. rr - [.rr t . w.r w rawr~ a.' s t;.. r... F •.L J+~} :i:: ti • •:r:•~ .
wa .ar -.ter .n.Mas.m:r~prs .V(.\~} t :1 •'4a•::::.: }A':. •I•: A.• .1
' .art • , ' •;~;'/,~•,n,~.i::I ~ ~ ~ . • t i~ , • • /
wrr rr • a•.• a ,ww cl r1r 1:: •..u+i•A`: _:r.•:.
1 r. r •rlwwlr uw • Iw r • N uw ) ~ • r. i~
r ~•.rarlw t•w. wra _f•rr [JO' \ •1 1• rt"~~ t.:. •a •'~r ••i I i [••I /
j wxa ww...n ar.wrr un err ~ f. - - - - - - . • ~ • • • , •
Ir .It•n www-larw .fi. 7 I f' a: ~:La• •h'AN l•~ i, . a 'i • t I
ra. arwra . wr r [ ~ /
.purr +awrr s rrx . } r rr• raw I - ' • • 7; r r1` i' ' 11
r.r~ w art A Ow r[rs\ rte rra I- J t.A»tt W - _J /
I >..trr r.. wwx •ar•nrr u.rr aw.. r.w 1'.' A I . ;:;s:: ! >
I t aw wwx snot w.tr sr lrr : a 1- -
tw u..rrx. srxaa w.•r rr. r.r ) r - - - _ L rv wii;. • c \ J[~T~~=
rxr r ur www rw•nw ».p sr .w I 1 • ! n : }S!!'!' :.1 • r , . A I,Oy1T[•N • w
wR •U. sr ae.31••ran?.O
aw~~aw r r rat rlant[. r•[ ww 1I- " o L. t1y1Ca t- • ' '•'r ,a x Rto6} ` qAD . wat r.r a• wrr se • t.
rws w.rr arratra / • 1' - u ` • • • . ~j•IMN, l r•a GI` s»a•rrut. c•~t..SA
Atr
x..w art ?t, r.u .rra• 1 v 1 pl; S~ 1 • • .•ti' • p! .rr• a•• a..e ax
~ 1 t 1 V ` • / .•1'`rt' r F '"l• crr.a•ta• rw.•a_ w~
ar•a •xr..x r~ww ra rw. w. "6
rrw•w nawxr n~tt rw~rra ' n y r I / r • r y
rNr •r•rxr •xwrr r•r•M a, S• ern
• • r rlnr.rwr•a...a.a.raaw• LYMAN DEVELOPMENT '-»r PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 A
rr u •,w•a. asr•ww rot rrawn..a_ x a J naMMw w [•lawa
LAG
w.xrw waver w..w [aEEl3W11, MIr1E30iA 33331 HAWTHORW WOODS
' - a•.•n w a..rr.. »nl •r • o... •m £*0 •IIIESOr• s 71
a-r-n
8 .0' JP-30.2 -J-m JP-19" • 11
78
le' 89/+9, 880.5•;',. a 887.5 JP- 58 B83:0 O r-; I +9 2L~
8$ai 0t i ~j I
'
,1{..r•1=1IT~~ (~%v i., P-56
J q' JP3~~b 1.
856.0
p r 87i 3.0 0 ~..`i J 852.0 !Z7
J864.4
1. 882.0 854 6 Ih L 1.. i. a..,, y i N l
JP-20.1 " '6 - Rtot JP-T9. f,` zr._. J'
1 * }I~ 884.0 PA dP-54
88831
I ; I ; . .r •_l .iT! 'i1 ' l..i s 1 r~.d L F ` 8654
(?I:;,11i':jl`',~i; 1'1'.t ~f?,v:dPt'L'1`' ` ( ` l~~i:. If . 'ruP'L 7;-i-
3 p
} - - 111 838,77:r ~ .i.
JS 5
58.0,'•:'z
44 K re" az" 36 / 845.
848. "
Of JP-70
-dd JP34 Ftr x4'94310' r;= :0 lt+r ~r 1~ 1701: (1j' } COL JT ~
;t 4p^ •903.:3 ~'~-'JP.3 t i~cc~51J -2 4OI
.pp 21.7 j 84C1701
884.0
2 J P-25
89/.9 {866875:0' 40.0} , 1 8 7:04•-_.
i I,-
326 0 NA I Ie?. } / `L IB
~
CD .7111
45.0 JP-29.1 L.S.-I 8000.. Fapr
T
P- T.
-1887.5
889.1 19836 2 22:0
ac.~ i~• ,•'~`i`.,.. + 2. ' 180
18,
,,JP-69 ~1 ' ' s~ - ~dT l h~T~l2f k so
942.0 27"' 1'27Tt 1 , r
UP'
'-51 n :•.p .1 1 l• 952.0 2Q' ;i 9
540 i 908.b CHUn[i+ +n Luo1r0 s~ c,~j~)~ Mb: iz J~- A
76.0 I t I `'~/2.f7 ~'i I I V h.. 8~~•.~
90.0 0 _ 8260 877 0 /
b ~~3 {'t-~~~
'JP-50 ADDI 014
' r" .964 0 1 \ , ~J
,814. LP
i J
7-, 91 900-45 698.0 '903.6 y 90.6.0 p-4~E' 1-
903.8 1,• ,907.0 /8.0
:,f.H l LAKE
,~-891 3 LP-61 , r ~,a p x 1
894.0 /8844 rAP ~L4 r_ i '
' 887.01 i4CL~
j(T ml
LP 69 t 1,161;
'6878 VOW) LPg-52 893.0. LLggP7 46 r N4 Y ` 1 tF'-874/'r~f~~Cr.
d; 7 j j 2 S 1
-39 900 8 .381. 19 4:0 Af.N
16.0 LP 37 Lp•
D 91
10.6- ~j -/~eer.o g8i~00 6E LP~ ~tL' ~ 1~9{ ~ 9oe 03.8 92'
gP 5p1 J
LP- 870880b5;..a 740 -9
0
OR
78 5 17 64 8T . ~L1ps,33. x4 LL
L.Sr26 8
LP-45 - v;31
LP-38 J
865.0
878.5
c 12
41
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT
MAP.
CITY OF
EAGAN