The URL can be used to link to this page

06/04/1992 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 2, 1992 RE: THURSDAY - JUNE 4, 1992 COMMISSION MEETING The Advisory Commission will meet at the Municipal Center, departing at 6:30 P.M. for a tour of the Northview Athletic fields, Captain Dodd and Wescott Station Parks. The Commission will return at 7:30 P.M. for the regular meeting. After approval of the Agenda, the Minutes of the May 7th Commission meeting, and visitors to be heard, the first item of business is the Consent Agenda. CONSENT AGENDA The consent agenda has one item, and a brief memorandum has been included for your review concerning this particular item. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS There are three items under development proposals, which staff has provided you with a memorandum on. Perhaps the most difficult of the three will be the Y.M.C.A. Addition being brought forth by Opus Corporation on behalf of West Publishing Company and the Greater St. Paul Y.M.C.A. The Y.M.C.A. and West Publishing have asked for consideration for deferment and the release from the parks cash and trails dedication requirements based on the value and benefit the Y.M.C.A. provides the community. The Advisory Commission should review this memorandum and be prepared to discuss it in order to come to a conclusion in regards to this particular issue. OLD BUSINESS Staff will be discussing the Americans Disability Act (A.D.A.), and the program and design impact it has on Eagan parks and recreational programs. Staff believes the department has actively followed handicapped accessibility standards in its park design for a number of years and the City has continually adapted recreational programs to meet the needs for these services. Nevertheless, new standards are being applied, which the staff and Commission need to be sensitive to. Several staff members have already attended training sessions in meeting these new standards and will continue to look for opportunities to further our knowledge in regards to these standards as they become applicable. JUNE 4TH COMMISSION MEETING PAGE TWO NEW BUSINESS There are no items under new business or park development. WATER QUALITY There are two items under Water Quality. You will recall that the Advisory Commission discussed a report issued several weeks ago regarding fertilizer, and water quality implications. Rich Brasch will be discussing these items, as well as giving an update on the Lakeview Addition as part of his Water Quality Report. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS Included under this topic are the "Happenings", the 1993 Budget development and the Caponi Art Project Update. As always, if members of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission are unable to attend, either the tour or the regular meeting, please contact the office so that we are aware of your impending absence. Re ec ully submitted, Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation KV/bls Z. AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, June 4, 1992 6:30 PM Eagan Municipal Center A. 6:30 P.M. Tour Northview Athletic, Captain Dodd and Wescott Station Parks B. 7:30 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 7, 1992 F. Visitors to be Heard G. Consent Agenda (1) Rohlfs 1st Addition - Robert Rohlf H. Development Proposals (1) Hawthorne Woods North - Lyman Development Co. (2) River Bluff Addition - Heritage Development of MN Inc. (3) YMCA 1st Addition - Opus Corporation 1. Old Business (1) ADA - Program and Design Impacts J. New Business K. Parks Development L. Water Quality (1) Fertilizer Survey (2) Lakeview Addition Update M. Other Business and Reports (1) Department Happenings (2) 1993 Budget (3) Caponi Park Update N. Round Table 0. Adjournment 3. Subject to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MAY 7, 1992 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 7, 1992 with the following Commission Members present: Kevin Knight, Lee Markell, Deborah Johnson, Ted Billy, Jack Johnson, Jonathan Widen and Erin Ipsen. Commission Member Dan Mooradian was not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator; Jon Oyanagi, Recreation Supervisor and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Ted Billy moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as presented. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 2, 1992 Erin Ipsen moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as presented. CONSENT AGENDA It was noted that there were no Consent Agenda items to review. LEXINGTON POINTE 8TH ADDITION - JAMES A. CURRY Stephen Sullivan introduced this item as a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Commercial Planned Development to D-1 Single Family and the rezoning of approximately 80 acres from Community Shopping Center to R-1 Residential along with the preliminary platting of 167 single family lots. Steve continued that this parcel is part of the Lexington South Planned Development located south of Co. Rd. #30, east of Co. Rd. #43, north of Walnut Hill Park and west of the Lexington Pointe subdivision. It was noted that the perpetual residential down zoning has resulted in additional residents within Park Service Area #26 currently served by Walnut Hill neighborhood park. Trapp Farm Park and the Highline Corridor also provide a complimentary level of service. The build-out of this P.S.A is approximately 4700 with the entire population being within 3/4 mile of the two identified parks. Therefore, a cash parks dedication was recommended. Relative to the trail dedication, Mr. Sullivan explained that the original Planned Development Agreement required that trails be installed and their costs borne by the developer, however, continued revisions to the PD has resulted in an amended agreement requiring plats to no longer install trails, but to pay a cash trails dedication. The plat is also responsible for providing a north/south corridor from Daniel Drive to the Highline Corridor with the escrow money already provided by Tri-Land Development for this trail link. The current proposal indicates an 8' bituminous trail alignment running from Daniel Drive, along the south side of Eagan Center Road to an outlot between lots 46/47. This corridor continues in a landscape median of Pointe Esplanade to Lexington Pointe Parkway. Crossing Lexington Pointe Parkway, it continues easterly within the southern boulevard where it traverses south along a pond, terminating at the Highline Corridor. Staff is recommending that the proposed 8' bituminous trail located within the north boulevard of Lexington Pointe Parkway should be relocated to the south boulevard. This trail alignment provides a continuous trailway along the roadway from Lexington Avenue to the Highline Corridor. The City's Engineering Department is requesting the road access to the lots south of Lexington Pointe Parkway be 5. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOUCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 1992 MEETING PAGE 2 relocated and aligned with Pointe Esplanade Road and Parks staff feels this realignment, in conjunction with a four-way stop, would facilitate a safer pedestrian crossing. Steve continued that staff met with the developer regarding tree preservation on the site and the developer has been open to looking at how to best accommodate this request. Rich Brasch reviewed the water quality issues noting that storm water runoff from about 54 acres of the Lexington Pointe-8th Addition development will drain to JP-50 under the proposed storm sewer configuration. The remaining 16 acres will drain offsite around the edges of the development. 16.8 acres of the Lexington Pointe-3rd Addition off the southeast corner of the 8th Addition presently drains to Pond JP-50 and can be treated once the pond is completed. In order to meet treatment obligations for the platted single family residential area within the Lexington Pointe-8th Addition credit could be given to the developer for using JP-50 to treat runoff from the "grandfathered" 3rd Addition to make up for area in the 8th Addition that can not be intercepted by JP-50- Jack Johnson expressed his concern for the crossing at Lexington Pointe Parkway and Pointe Esplanade Road suggesting that protection needs to be provided at this intersection. Steve Sullivan responded that staff concurs with a four-way stop at this intersection. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council regarding Lexington Pointe 8th Addition. 1. That the plat be subject to a cash trailway dedication. 2. That the plat be subject to a cash park dedication. 3. That the proposed 8 foot bituminous trail located within the north boulevard of Lexington Pointe Boulevard be relocated to the south boulevard. 4. That the road access to the lots south of Lexington Pointe Parkway be relocated and aligned with Pointe Esplande Road. A four (4) way stop with cross walks and pedestrian ramp should be implemented at this proposed intersection. 5. The development shall be responsible for grading a 10 foot wide trail pad, providing an all pedestrian ramp, and assuring no encumbrances within the pedestrian corridor. Trail gradients and pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA design requirements. 6. The applicant will be responsible in a coordinated effort with the City for the installation of trails. 7. The development is to be evaluated and revised to maximize tree preservation of the oak and maple woodland areas. These preservation efforts to be reviewed and approved by staff prior to final plat. The developer will also be responsible for submitting a tree protection plan prior to final plat. 8. The development shall meet its water quality treatment requirement by constructing an on- site pond to treat runoff from the proposed single family residential development. The storm system layout and pond design must be approved by City staff prior to final plat. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 1992 METING PAGE 3 LAKEVIEW TRAIL ADDITION Stephen Sullivan introduced this item as an application requesting the rezoning of 19.64 acres from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family and the preliminary platting of 37 lots. This parcel is located south of Manor Lake Addition, west of State Highway 3 and east of Dodd Road. Steve continued that Park Service Area #36 was evaluated with the platting of the Manor Lake Addition at which time the Commission recommended that Manor Lake provide a land dedication of approximately 2.6 acres and the rough grading of the parkland. The Commission anticipated a future parkland dedication of approximately 2 acres from the Lakeview Trail Addition. The parkland dedication with the Manor Lake subdivision equates to 1.94 acres and the current proposal provides 1.54 acres for parkland. Steve added that the .40 acre short fall of land equates to a cash equivalent of $5,195.87 and would also be subject to a cash trails dedication. Rich Brasch reviewed the water quality issues noting that the development is located in the upper reach of drainage basin L and borders the north shore of pond LP-26, a Class 11 lake intended to have water quality sufficient to support indirect contact recreation activities. Rich continued that on-site ponding to meet treatment requirements for the remaining 14.4 acres of the site is both feasible and desirable. It is anticipated that two ponds would be built on-site; one located on lot 16 and 17 and treat run-off from about 6.3 acres of the site before discharging to Pond LP-26, and the second to be located in the northeast corner of the site to treat run-off from approximately 3.5 acres of the Lakeview Trails Addition as well as 3 acres of the Manor Lake 3rd and 4th Addition. Mr. Brasch concluded that this particular area of the city has a high level of high quality water bodies. Jack Johnson expressed concern for the grassy area that will need to be graded and the need to provide for quick re-establishment of the grass on this site. Mr. Johnson asked if the water could be re- routed to another pond. Mr. Brasch answered that substantial re-grading would need to occur on the western portion of the development to allow for this option. He added that this option could prove to be very costly for the developer. Mr. Johnson asked that this, or other options, be considered as alternatives for this site. Mr. Brasch added that the developer did not own the land to the west of the site making ponding in this location a difficult option. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved, Erin Ipsen seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council regarding Lakeview Trail Addition: 1. That the plat be responsible for a parkland contribution of 1.54 acres as configured by the site plan dated March 16, 1992. 2. That the plat be responsible for a cash park dedication of $5,195.87. The dedication may, at the discretion of staff, be applied to parks grading with the terms of the grading to be worked out between staff and developer. 3. The plat be responsible for a cash trails dedication of $3,700.00. 4. That this development meet its water quality treatment requirements by creating two treatment ponds on-site. The storm sewer layout and pond design should be reviewed an approved by City staff prior to final plat. The two acre drainage concern expressed by staff is to be reviewed by staff to include an option for overland drainage. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 1992 MEETING PAGE 4 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 - DEERWOOD SCHOOL 2ND ADDITION Parks Planner Stephen Sullivan introduced this item as a request to rezone 23.5 acres from Agricultural to Public Facilities and the Preliminary Platting of one lot for a middle school on a parcel located south of Deerwood Drive and west of Deerwood Elementary School. Some of the issues for the Commission to review included determining the parks and trails dedication and discussion the impact to the woodland resource. Steve stated that public facilities are not obligated to provide park dedication. Relative to the trails dedication issue, an existing trail lies within the southern boulevard of Deerwood Drive. Since this parcel did not participate in the cost of the trails, staff recommended this proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. The parcel contains approximately 2.3 acres of significant woodlands adjacent to Deerwood Drive around a small pond. The tree survey provided by the School District indicates a predominance of oaks ranging in size from 12" to 40" in diameter. Steve continued that the existing grading plan indicates no preservation of the existing woodland and pond given the School District's need for athletic playing fields. The proposal is to relocate the pond within an area that cannot support athletic play fields. Water Quality Coordinator Brasch reviewed the water quality issues relative to this proposal. He continued that in order to fully meet treatment requirements the proposed pond would need to be.57 acres in surface area and have a wet volume of 2.25 acre-feet at the normal water elevation. Because site constraints limit the size of the proposed on-site pond to .45 acres and approximately 1.6 acre-feet, a treatment deficiency exists. In respect to the wetlands, Mr. Brasch stated that the inventory indicates that three wetlands with a total acreage of .44 acres would be filled as a result of development. The first lies in the southwest corner of the parcel and is identified as a Type 2 wet meadow of .12 acres in area. The second wetland lies off the southwest corner of Deerwood Elementary School identified as a Type 1 bottomland hardwood forest. The third wetland located south of Deerwood Drive in the north central area of the site is identified as a Type 2 wet meadow with a narrow fringe of Type I bottomland hardwood forest. The developer is proposing to fill all three wetlands totaling .44 surface acres. Mr. Brasch concluded that the use of the treatment pond proposed for the northeast corner of the site is allowable for wetland replacement purposes under the Wetlands Conservation Act - Interim Program. To the extent that the surface area of the proposed treatment pond equals or exceeds .44 acres in surface area, the wetlands replacement requirement can be met by the treatment pond. Director Vraa added that the Commission has looked at a joint school/city facility option for this site in the past but it appeared not to be a viable option based on the facilities needed by the School District and the limited area in which to develop those facilities on this site. Lee Markel) expressed his concern for the proposed filling of the wetlands and asked if there was any possibility of tree preservation on the site. Steve Sullivan responded that tree preservation was not an option based on the facility layout and grading plan. Director Vraa asked the School District's representative if it would be possible to relocate some of the plant material if there was going to be significant tree loss. A representative of Wold indicated that there would be no objection to that option and that the School District would be working at buffering to mitigate some of the impact. Mr. Markell asked what the schedule was for the development of this site. Wold indicated that grading would begin after school was out hoping that the facilities would be ready for fall, 1992. Construction of the building would begin in the fall as well. 8. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 1992 MEETING PAGE 5 Deborah Johnson stated she understood making the wetland replacements but was very disappointed that these valuable resources would need to be compromised. Lee Markell added that a private housing developer would not have been allowed to compromise the wetlands and trees and asked what other options the Commission could consider. Lee suggested that an option to be considered would be that the wooded area be used as a nature area in conjunction with other school programs before the plan is approved. After considerable discussion Lee Markell moved that the plat be responsible for a cash trails dedication; that the school district take a closer look at preserving the area south of Deerwood consisting of a depression surrounded by trees as a possible outdoor education area that could tie in with the ball fields and athletic fields and that the school district consider looking for additional land acquisition. Mr. Markell explained the intent of the motion was designed to have the district look at environmental education as an important part of the students curriculum - as important as the need for playfield/physical education needs. After further discussion, Deborah Johnson seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-1 with Jack Johnson voting against. PROPOSED REGULATIONS TO CONTROL IMPACTS TO BOULEVARD AND TRAIL AREAS Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde introduced this item noting that city staff had raised concerns over the impacts that certain developments were having on trails and boulevard areas within the City of Eagan. Ti.,,=se concerns were primarily related to contractors using the boulevard areas as an ingress/egress point to construction sites, and erosion and siltation onto trail surfaces. The result of these concerns was the formation of a committee to further investigate these and other impacts to boulevard areas, along with proposed regulations for protecting the city's trails infrastructure. The four issues that were identified included 1) Driving and parking on city trails. 2) Utility construction/reconstruction. 3) Vehicular access across boulevard and 4) Erosion/siltation. John then reviewed each item and the proposed series of changes to the city's regulatory instruments made by the committee which included modifications and additions to the City Ordinance, development of a new public utility maintenance vehicle permit and changes and additions to the city's right-of-way construction permit. After considerable discussion, Kevin Knight moved, Lee Markell seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the changes in the proposed regulations to control impacts to boulevard and trail areas in the City of Eagan as proposed by staff. PROPOSED SCHWANZ LAKE WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN Rich Brasch explained that in 1989 the City applied for a grant through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Cleanwater Partnership Program to develop a strategy to combat water quality degradation in Schwanz Lake located in Trapp Farm Park which is one of the most intensely used parks in the city. Of the estimated cost for the study ($74,000) half was paid for by the Cleanwater Partnership Grant from PCA with the remaining costs being covered through a combination of in-kind services performed by City staff and City cash contributions. Mr. Brasch outlined the major work elements of the project noting that one year was spent on these items culminating in the selection of remedial alternatives and completion of implementation plan. Rich reviewed a table outlining preliminary treatment alternatives for Schwanz Lake. After significant discussion the Commission felt the priorities for the structural alternatives would be to enlarge pond LP-32.1, Construct 9. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 1992 MEETING PAGE 6 park basin and create lift station bay. Rich also reviewed all the cost implications for these options. Mr. Brasch noted that when the city is successful at improving the water quality of this highly classified water body, the lake can then be stocked. Jack Johnson thanked Rich for the in-depth information and options that need to be considered. He suggested looking at all options and deciding which ones would be the best options for the dollars allocated. HAWTHORNE WOODS UPDATE Parks Planner Sullivan reminded the Commission that they had reviewed this development at the February, 1992 meeting where the developer proposed a pad grading approach but intended to evaluate lot specific tree preservation once road center lines were staked. Steve continued that the developers sensitive site planning and lot specific tree preservation minimized the unnecessary loss of the woodland resource within this residential subdivision. Lee Markell suggested that a letter be drafted on behalf of the Commission commending the developer for tree preservation within their development. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Superintendent of Recreation Peterson reviewed several Happenings items including the upcoming Eagan Fun Run; the field space allocation identified for EAA baseball and softball; the first soccer tournament planned for Memorial week-end and the Region 1AA girls fast pitch softball tournament to be played at Northview. ICE ARENA/SWIMMING POOL UPDATE Director Vraa stated that seven people attended the first informational meeting held regarding the ice arena/pool. He continued that the cable presentation that has been showing may have been seen by enough people to have provided the information they were looking for. ROUND TABLE Jack Johnson commented on the EHS Football Booster Club fertilizer sale throughout the community stating he was pleased to see one of the fertilizers offered had zero phosphorous content. Mr. Johnson suggested that a letter be drafted on behalf of the Commission to the Booster Club to thank them for their support of no phosphorous fertilizer. With no further business to conduct Erin Ipsen moved, Lee Markell seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 PM. Secretary Date /O• MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DATE: MAY 29, 1992 RE: CONSENT AGENDA 1. Rohlfs 1st Addition - Robert Rohif A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately .49 previously-zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres located along the west side of Wuthering Heights Road, north of Silver Bell Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 18. RECOMMENDATION: o The plat be subject to a cash parks dedication. o The plat be subject to a cash trails dedication. SS/bls MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 29, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ROHLFS FIRST ADDITION PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a single-family residential development consisting of one lot on .49 acres located along the west side of Wuthering Heights Road north of Silver Bell Road in the southeast one quarter of Section 18. The owner has requested a building permit that would authorize the construction of a manufactured home on the parcel. City staff are not authorized to grant the building permit on unplatted property, so the item was sent to the February 21st City Council Meeting. The Council approved the issuance of the building permit, with a condition that the property be platted. Under City policy, all preliminary plat applications are required to provide water quality mitigation, either in the form of on-site ponding and/or a cash dedication. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission needs to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This development is located at the extreme lower end of drainage basin A (Figure 1). There are no recreational class water bodies down drainage of the development. In addition, the development is too small to accommodate on-site ponding that would conform with nurp standards. Therefore, a cash dedication is being recommended to meet water quality requirements. Using the methodology established in the City Water Quality Management Plan, the amount of the dedication is estimated at $353 based on a hypothetical pond surface area of .014 acres, a pond volume of .035 acre feet, and the cash dedication schedule for single family residential land. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the development meet its water quality requirement through a cash dedication. 2,~ Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/sb 28wp.advis2.148 /3. All- FIGURE .k' J CL co Q 4 U i s kl9A L) Q r.. 1U `i 4 ~~T-. a 1 it 10 t, 2 IL -i S1 t f ^ Ito Q V 4 - 1C1 i r o _ a pLr c', { NVj v^ a 0 -T 2 ui 1\ A ~9• , ~ \ W uu C45 ~ J Jd V, Cc° ~00 .rte + r ~ a 1 r \ r . s 1 /4. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DATE: MAY 29, 1992 RE: HAWTHORNE NORTH ADDITION PROPOSAL An application has been received requesting the rezoning of 8.8 acres from agriculture to R-1, Single Family and the preliminary plat of 12 lots. The subject parcel is located south of County Road #30, north of Hawthorne Woods Addition, east of Dodd Road and west of State Highway #3. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following items: 1. What is the parkland dedication for this proposal? 2. What is the trails dedication for this proposal? 3. What is the developmental impact to the woodland resource? ANALYSIS/PARKS DEDICATION The site is within Park Service Area #25 W. The neighborhood parks which serve the proposed development are Lakeside and South Oak Parks. Adequate parkland and recreation facilities exist within the Park Service Area, therefore staff recommends a cash parkland dedication. The current proposal is for 12 single family lots. The 1992 Parks Dedication Policy requires $700.00 cash parks dedication per residential unit. This rate equates to a cash parkland dedication of $8,400.00. s. HAWTHORNE ADDITION PAGE TWO MAY 29, 1992 ANALYSIS ITRAILS DEDICATION The 1992 Trails Dedication Policy requires a cash rate of $100.00 per unit. The platting of 12 lots at $100 per unit equates to a dedication of $1,200.00. The Comprehensive Trails Plan proposes detached trailways along both sides of Dodd Road and County Road #30, west of Dodd Road. The Commission may recall that the Autumn Ridge Subdivision is responsible for the construction of a 6' concrete sidewalk along Hackmore Drive. As well, the Hawthorne Woods Addition was responsible in grading a sidewalk corridor along Hawthorne Woods Drive connecting to this Autumn Ridge sidewalk. This neighborhood pedestrian system will provide safe and efficient pedestrian circulation to Pinewood Elementary School, to Dodd Road and to the future detached trail along County Road #30. Another benefit is that the sidewalk provides linkage to Lakeside Park. The current proposal indicates a neighborhood collector road called Hawthorne Woods Drive. The proposed road intersects with Hackmore Drive and County Road #30. Staff recommends that the sidewalk corridor along the east side of Hawthorne Woods Drive be graded from the Hawthorne Addition to County Road #30. ANALYSIS/WOODLAND PRESERVATION The site contains one central woods with two small clearings adjacent to the east and west boundaries. The lower area contains primarily box elders and elm. The slopes and higher ground are characterized with oaks, aspen, birch and cherry. The prescribed road access at both County Road #30 and Hawthorne Woods Addition offer little opportunity for layout diversity other than centrally located single fronted lots off Hawthorne Woods Drive. As a result tree loss occurs with the grading of the easterly house pads and roadway. The proposal preserves a large portion of the woods within the rear yards of the easterly lots. The proposal also indicates a schematic location for a future water treatment/storm sewer pond. The pond's general location is within a clearing and appears to provide minimal impact to the woods. The perimeter of this proposed ponding area has a scattering of large oaks and mature aspen stands. Any future refinement of the pond layout would need to include a tree survey of the pond area. This survey would help the pond design in minimizing the developmental impact to the woodland resource. . AV HAWTHORNE ADDITION PAGE THREE MAY 29, 1992 RECOMMENDATIONS: The Commission may consider the following recommendations: o The plat be subject to a cash parks dedication. o The plat be subject to a cash trails dedication. o The developer grade a 10' wide sidewalk pad along the east side of Hawthorne Woods Drive. The developer be responsible for providing no encumbrances with the sidewalk corridor. o The developer provide a tree survey identifying significant individual trees adjacent to the proposed pond area. The pond should be designed to preserve these significant trees. The tree survey and pond layout should be completed and approved by staff prior to final platting. o The developer shall provide for staff approval a tree protection plan prior to final plat. This plan shall identify significant trees and tree masses. The plan should also show the proposed location of tree protection fencing. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 29, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR HAWTHORNE WOODS - NORTH ADDITION - LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a single-family residential development consisting of 12 lots on 8.8 acres located south of Diffley Road west of Highway 3 and north of the approved preliminary plat of Hawthorne Woods Addition. The land is now zoned for agricultural uses, so a change in zoning to single-family residential uses has been requested as well. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Plan. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed development lies in the upper reaches of stormwater management drainage basin J (Figure 1). Drainage basin J includes Fish Lake at the lower end of the basin. The City is proposing to require the development to provide a pond on-site to reduce peak flood flows before they are conveyed to the storm sewer system that will be constructed as part of another City project associated with the upgrade of Diffley Road (Figure 2). Since the land will be dedicated for ponding purposes, the developer has requested to use this site to satisfy water quality requirements for the proposed Hawthorne Woods north development, as well as the adjacent Hawthorne Woods development to the south. Both Hawthorne Woods North and Hawthorne Woods are being subdivided by the Lyman Development Company. The ponding area in this development is proposed to be .8 acres in surface area at the normal water level. If it is built to NURP standards, it would have a wet pond volume of approximately 3.7 acre feet. This pond would be of sufficient size to adequately treat stormwater run-off from approximately 41 acres of single-family residential development. the pond would be located in an area that would catch run-off from parts of the Hawthorne Woods North, Hawthorne Woods and Autumn Ridge Developments, as well as run-off from undeveloped property to the east of the proposed pond. The developer would like to use /9. HAWTHORNE WOODS - NORTH ADDITION May 29, 1992 Page Two WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS (Cont.) the treatment capacity of this pond to decrease the cash dedication obligation on the Hawthorne Woods Development reviewed by the Commission at its February, 1992 meeting. As the Commission will recall, the cash dedication to satisfy water quality treatment requirements for this development was just over $27,900. Because the development is in a priority drainage basin and provides the opportunity to treat stormwater run-off from a number of different developments using a single pond that can meet all NURP standards, staff is recommending that the ponding area be used to satisfy water quality requirements as well. If the Commission concurs, the water quality cash dedication for Hawthorne Woods would decrease to approximately $12,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the developer be allowed to use ponding on the Hawthorne Woods North site to meet water quality dedication requirements for both the Hawthorne Woods North and Hawthorne Woods developments to the extent possible. Any shortfall for either development would be met with a cash dedication. The pond design must be approved by City staff. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/sb 28wp.advis3.148 2O. 30 JP=20 FIGURE JP-5 VII CL It CL.V JP- 20.1 ~s p gip'^16 I oL-J 1-4 CL. V C 6D4 •Yom- -54 ROO'* k r,`\ CL. VII JP- 23 CL. V ~~,i J (N JP-2 ate.. ~~J~ ~2 j:l I CLV C L J-r JP-25.1 E ;;4 114, 2' A0C I N f: JR="53 1P-Z2 2.. CL. V CO T Y __CL. CL.VII L. S. -18 16 tP-=2 7-\ JP-2 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION CL.V 2 P-69 Jp:7Z - *o CL, \9 _CL. V11-Li _ ~II JP_-28. P-,8 JP-52 VI CL. 1V CL - V - SO/ 9 L. - 7 I.1 c 1-- LOW Owosso E PARK L =ALP-a CLJII - ~ •y L \ \ ter.. -1 _--a'`~"!}~ 'rr' CL. P-37 - _ _r~ -.,~a:~~ tix+.:C,?;i>r LP-67 CL. VII A 7 ILP3 CLV! -30 CL 9 GL. II - v LP-45 CL. 11 41* CL,. IVCLli { 21 LP-24 hT Q 2 IV CL. I LP-27 CL. IV LP-19 IwoRONI CL. I ADD A LP-22 CL. 1 l~ .2 - v3 a, FIGURE 2 _Q Q 7~ B :57 'z 1, 1 < tC s ;III I c , ILA J Y a E w _ N _ r~ I I ~Ty w~ ~ y I ~•'•~'fr N S t ! • e> '-77 ~ ~ - ' t j' i 91 + ~ b f~ i I 1 i~ _ u I I l l 1 i y ' T I Y ' a 1 I I I I I 1 lpEF~~lt if?~: 22. !•h MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DATE: MAY 29, 1992 ' RE: RIVER BLUFF ADDITION A application has been made for the platting of three lots for 36 units on 4.1 acres. This multiple development is within P.S.A. #20 being served by Blackhawk Park. Staff recommends a cash parks dedication. The development is subject to a cash trails dedication The site contains no significant vegetation. RECOMMENDATIONS: o The plat be subject to a cash parks dedication. o The plat be subject to a cash trails dedication. SS/bls Z3. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCE COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 28, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR RIVER BLUFF ADDITION PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a townhouse residential development consisting of 36 units on three lots of a 4.1 acre site located just west of I-35E and east of Blackhawk Road. The site is currently zoned for R-4, Multiple Family Housing. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards set by the city in it's Water Quality Management Plan. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This multi-family residential development is located in drainage basin A in southeast Eagan (Figure 1). Runoff from this site will first reach Pond AP-2, a designated storm water basin in the city's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond AP-2 discharges to Pond AP-1 in Woodhaven Park which is designated as a Class 3 - Scenic Recreational Water Body and is the nearest downstream recreational water body. AP-1 has a total drainage area of approximately 1,800 acres, is extremely shallow, and supports a mixed emergence/open water community over most of it's area. It does not currently meet water quality standards set by the city. Because the existing storm water system that would receive runoff from this development is of insufficient capacity, the Public Works Department will likely require the developer to provide ponding to substantially reduce the peak flood flow from the site after development. The most likely location for use as a ponding area is a natural wetland of about 1 acre located just north of the proposed development (Figure 2). The developer would be responsible for purchasing a drainage easement for this wetland and for constructing an inlet and an outlet. Z5. ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MAY 28, 1992 PAGE 2. During initial discussions with the developer by city staff, staff indicated that this development would probably be subject to a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality treatment standards. The rationale behind this preliminary recommendation was that there is a lack of sensitive water bodies immediately downstream of the proposed project and that the size of the development relative to the drainage area of the nearest recreational waterbody downstream is extremely small. However, the developer has expressed an interest in using any dedicated storm water area to satisfy water quality treatment requirements through creation of a wetpond. In addition, residents adjacent to the wetland have expressed an interest in having the developer create open water over some of all of the wetland. The wetland is entirely covered by a thick stand of cattails and has limited value for wildlife and water quality in it's present state. If a pond is created to meet water quality treatment requirements, the pond should be created to function properly. Because of the small size of the development, a calculated pond size for this development is too small to meet minimum acceptable depth parameters of 3 feet for a constructed nutrient detention basin. A pond with a depth of 3 feet would have a surface area of .37 acres and a volume of 1.1 acre feet, according to the city water quality model. If allowed to use the previously mentioned wetland as a water quality treatment feature, the developer should also be required to excavate the wetland to create a pond that meets these minimum criteria for depth, volume, and area. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the developer meet it's water quality treatment requirements by excavating a portion of the wetland to the north of the proposed development. The excavation should be done to minimize disturbance to riparian vegetation as much as possible and the pond should meet the minimum depth, volume, and area requirements identified above. The excavation work shall be subject to approval by city staff. Any deficiency in wetpond treatment volume can be made up through a cash dedication. Rich Brasch Water Resource Coordinator RB/nab 4B:APRNRC.153 C _ ar $ ACH FOX PARK FIGURE ~41s` RIDGE ' C /CL. Q / Ir 0 A WES ~CL.VIV CL I A RI JOHNSON / . VI jrd GA qEY G~~a f f~ 2ND Ac to i N, ENSI PLAY >tr, i / < 5 11H HT$' CP- 12 L41 A-0 CL. VII P%ML:Cl 2nd 3 L 3 4 K NCUS7R!AL '~Rb(~ /'y r CP- E CtRC• A b CL. VI 24. aaag Alf r p 3L, At- x ~`I_ - - BPI ~ P ICE 1-7 5,4 *4 00 L z-z-- vil r? :,+at- LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT &A I MA Fri XMAWK CL.V L AW-A 35 LIAN AP-4 A EN CL. IV# 'I . -W CL~, 7.2 SP-25 -1 SP-4 GENII AP-35 % CL.VII BP- + CL. V :j!2 / BPc. s. A w. C L. V i ati ' eP5 3A7F0 CL. 11 S./ / off- .2 BP-23 -7 .1% Ho P-9-1 IT FIGURE 2 4,4 qV4 f r Z O Jb < / / / r * ZZN C_ ~J 1 / / ~ Z Z W V-< erx 1 / 777 I "N : t i ~ ~ G T s L O co 416 416 0 g v Z}-WQ CZ Lu _j t n' - L- LU ~ LLinO LL 00 LU cr: ' 1 B 2 ~s • ss^~ ! re•I ~ - Dili. : i E i•`f S a~3S ~'Bgt f Ii;~ k , r VN1 else li:1 z z ld~ to (u IT I.ftflf OZ~~ ~d)aZ ~z~z W w j; 6~ ii i g ! ;t a Z ? r ? m p C~ $ ' e t CIF • ~ lit ~ W Lu Y 11 -J OCz J ~ W < y t.;~ ~K OL 0~ uZ 2O~uZ w GO a u Y, Z8. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM:( KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 2, 1992 RE: Y.M.C.A. - 1ST ADDITION BACKGROUND An application has been submitted for the platting of one (1) lot and three (3) outlots on 41.6 acres. This property is currently owned by West Publishing Company, with the intent that one lot will be given to the Y.M.C.A. for a facility. The three remaining outlots will be owned by West Publishing Company. West Publishing made a commitment to the Y.M.C.A. to dedicate property on their corporate site for a building. However, due to complications when they originally acquired the property, this site was no longer feasible and a new site had to be found. West Publishing purchased this forty-one (41) acre parcel for the specific purpose of donating a portion of it to the Y.M.C.A. for construction of a facility. In preparing the plat application, West Publishing chose to plat the entire 41 acre parcel, providing all grading and meeting all water quality requirements for the entire site. ISSUE The issue before the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission pertains to trails and parks dedication requirements for this plat application. REQUEST FOR SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES At the request of West Publishing Company, the Director of Parks & Recreation, met with representatives of West Publishing and the Y.M.C.A. of Greater St.Paul. Mr. Steve Bryant, representing West, requested that West Publishing be freed of any cash parks dedication or cash trails dedication on this 41.6 acre site - given the fact that West Publishing was donating property to the Y.M.C.A. for a facility that would meet many of the recreational and service needs of the community. Mr. J.R. Shannon of the Y.M.C.A., also indicated the value of the Y.M.C.A. to the community. He stated that the Y.M.C.A. provides financial assistance for Y.M.C.A. members and non-members, which is a service to any community that they are within. (See Attachment) 29. YMCA - 1ST ADDITION PAGE TWO As the Commission may know, the City has treated unusual properties, such as churches and schools, and recently the H.R.A. Senior Housing Program, somewhat differently for parks and trails dedication. The issue before the Advisory Commission is "Does the Y.M.C.A. fit a special classification for consideration of parks dedication, and should the request for abatement of parks dedication on the three outlots, retained by West Publishing, be reduced or eliminated as a result of their donating property to the Y.M.C.A." PAST PRACTICES While it is true that schools and churches have not typically paid parks dedication, neither has escaped the responsibility of paying for trails dedication. Recent plats of Elementary School #17, and the Middle School on Deerwood, recently had been preliminarily platted, each with the responsibility of paying for trails dedication. The churches which have been preliminarily platted since the institution of the trails dedication, or under the previous ordinance, have been responsible for trails. Staff can find no exception to the trails responsibility. As to parks dedication, schools have not paid any, because it is reasoned, that they provide athletic fields for use by the community for after school hours. Schools are zoned public facilities. Cash parks dedication on commercial/industrial property, which this is zoned, is applied at the time of the preliminary plat approval, but is not collected until a building permit is pulled. In the case of churches and schools, the cash dedication requirement has either been waived entirely or has been made a condition of the plat, and held in abeyance until such time as the property should ever deviate from its intended use as a school or church. In the case of the H.R.A., a cash dedication requirement for parks was calculated, but an agreement struck by which the general public would have access to the H.R.A. building for senior citizen activities. These activities would be coordinated by the Parks and Recreation Department and would provide program services for residents of the senior citizens high rise, as well as those residing elsewhere in the community. In essence, the parks dedication provides a direct credit from which services can be provided by the H.R.A. and the City without a rental fee, etc. You will also recall that in this situation the City also provided nearly $1 million dollars in housing funds to help complete this structure. DISCUSSION When the parks dedication ordinance was implemented, the intent was for it to apply to residential and commercial/industrial development and those who have an obvious and definitive impact on the park system, either as residents or as businesses whose employees make use of the park system and its various athletic and recreational programs. Consequently, those entities have been charged with the responsibility of helping to pay for the creation of that park system through parks dedication. Not every exception could be envisioned to this dedication requirement. Schools and churches have been, as a matter of practice and policy, viewed as a different category of usership. YMCA - 1ST ADDITION PAGE THREE Should the Y.M.C.A. be included in this category? Should a new category be determined? Schools have been exempt from parks cash dedication, because they provide facilities for the community usership, in fact, the City has developed Joint Powers Agreements for use of school fields by the community during the summer time. The Y.M.C.A. will be providing field space on which they will operate their own programs. Does the Commission view this field space and the programs offered as being a rationale for the dismissal/or reduction of a cash dedication? Is the Y.M.C.A. similar to the H.R.A., in which credit equivalent to the cash dedication is provided for community residents, or is the Y.M.C.A. no different than any commercial business that charges a membership fee, such as Northwest Racquet and Swim Club and the Eagandale Athletic Club. The Commission should also discuss the cash dedication requirements for the three outlots. West Publishing has provided the one lot for the Y.M.C.A.; at a significant cost to them for acquisition and site development. Should these three lots be included in the credit calculations for the Y.M.C.A. (if the Commission should choose this as a recommendation), or when these outlots are eventually sold and built upon - should they then be reviewed for a cash dedication based on their intended use? FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Advisory Commission should review all of the information and make a determination and recommendation to the City Council in regards to cash parks and cash trails dedication on the one (1) lot and potentially the three (3) outlots for this 41.6 acre preliminary plat application. KV/bls 3i. YMCA OF GREATER SAINT PAUL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SUMKARY REPORT 1991 -------------------------------CATEGORY BRANCH CAT 1990 1991 TOTAL COST PARTICIPANT FINANCIAL QUALIFYING REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL TOTAL PAID ASSISTANCE FINANCIAL FROM CITY-WIDE UNITS UNITS GRANTED ASSISTANCE RESOURCES (50$ FOR MATCH OF QUALIFYING EXCEPT LEARN- TO-SWIN) SgYWAY/ ADULT 442 430 $179,706 $62,569 $117,137 EAST FAMILY * 416 434 109,299 15,722 Z YOUTH $247,974 $72,577 $175,397 5109,299 E 3 24 $5,060 $2,511 $2,549 $15 $7 $344 DAY CAMP 0 59 ,722 SLINMI /CITIES 71 0 $14,0$62 0 $6.335 $7,727 57.727 $0 S0 $0 CHILD CARE 1 0 $0 $0 50 $0 $ 0 0 - N TOTALS 933 947 $446,802 $143,992 $302,810 $181,806 $20,280 NORTHEAST ADULT 28 33 - -----------$471 • FAMILY * 180 210 $10,888 $3,197 $7,691 $3,972 $471 HAMF 8 1 $100$,1601 $25,068 $75,$84 $33,283 $4,103 DAY S 30 $84 4 21 29 $8,489 S1 UPkARD BOUND $2,$54 $6,135 $5,154 $1,341 CHILD CARE 2 7 $189 $135 M so $0 $2,775 $999 $1,775 775 $863 0 ALS 240 285 $123,055 $31,808 $91,247 $43,441 $5,915 Y SLY * 127 77 $32,124 $8,027 $24,097 $11,678 YOUTH 157 135 $80,465 523.954 556,511 $22 $5,842 $3,260 $1,027 ,466 $2,233 DAY CAMP 26 38 510, 866 $5,$465 3 905 $338 UPWARD CARE 0 ,905 $4,961 $378 CHILD U 15 3 $360 $180 4180 $180 0 15- 21 $67,255 $57,937 $9,318 $1,638 $4$11 TOTALS - ----356------ 290 $194,330 597,030 $97,300 $37,463 $10,985 rti*** ADULT NORTHWEST 26 23 $9,384 $3.522 $5,862 $3,561 $701 FAMILY * 12 $69,852 $18,878 $50,974 $26,454 YOUTH 0 133 $553 $66 $ $487 $ $260 $5r $96 DAY CAMP 22 29 9b $6,740 $2,747 $3,993 $435 $218 UPWARD BWND 2 32 $1,280 Sel $1,199 $1,199 $580 CHILD CARE 17 23 $35,834 $14,408 $21,426 $20,865 $6,249 OTHER 1 TOTALS ----189--'-- 243 $123,643 $39,702 $83,941 $52,774 $13,520 SIX-YEAR SUMMARY OF FIYAIICIAL ASSISTANCE YMCA Of GREATER SAINT PAUL 96 NO. '86 FIN. '87 NO. '87 FIN. '83 NO. '88 FIN. An. * 99 ` 0- '90 1`14. '91 10. *91 FIN. IVID. BRANCH--------i---HELPED GRSA1L7EO---~---HELPED GRANTED-- 1HELPI=J---GRANTED ~--1NIELPED-- GRANTED 1HELPED GRANTED-- IHELPED GRANTED DU NORD] 22 $1,066 150 $3.753 258 521,377 241 511,627 283 $20,535 266 $28.197 NORTHLAND ST. CR011 115 $24,150 159 - $32.485 149 $33.045 158 $32,454 182 546,271 140 $38,236 WIDJIWAGA1 107 $26,750 125 530,826 123 535.139 257 536,693 177 537,183 117 $48,135 SKYWAY 184 $42,320 566 $131,713 762 5111,625 989 5154,777 - EAST 178 542,720 258 $66,659 650 6108.949 686 $109,928 E SXYtitAY/EAST 1706 52841339 3828 $302,810 MIDWAY 194 $43,456 297 566,269 574 $85,070 646 397,286 644 5106,452. 56~ 597,300 NORTHEAST 101 $18,281 136 $24,594 356 $49,862 446 $63,581 738 $84,993 711 191,247 NORTHWEST 285 $49,875 353 363,146 598 $54,791 627 $71.845 496 574,331 513 583,941 SOUTH 176 $34,848 259 551,535 601 575,000 600 579,945 750 $89.345 E94 $119.232 LEARN-T0-SKI11 1106 $9,125 3256 510,818 1228 $16,578 L300 517,550 1113 $14,469 701 56,575 TOTAL 2468 $292,581 3559 $481,798 5299 $591,436 5950 $675,686 6089 $757.918 5536 $817,673 SIX-YEAR TOTALS = 28,901 INDIVIDUALS HEL?EO WITH $3,617,092 IN F11IAJLC€AL ASSISTANCE. 06/0192 12:37 YMCA ST PALL' MN 004 F1 Program Policy Bulletin ADMINISTRATIVE MA11llAL No. 10 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR YMCA MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS within the available resources of the Association, the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul will provide services for any youth, senior, or adult who desires to participate and understands the benefice of the YMCA, regar.le5s of ability to pay the prescribed program fee. Those not able to pay the full fee may be awarded it full rhpartialsfinalcial assistance based on their demonstrated ability to pay and to fund the subsidy. ELIGIBILITY 1. Applicants must work or reside in the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul service area. 2. Assistance will be granted on the basis of financial need such as low caassistance guidelines income, hospital expenses, etc. TheYMCA Clifinfinancial attached to this policy may bc used as 3. The YMCA believes a strong sense of ownership and pride is developed if the financial assistance recipient has contributed to the cost of their YMCA involvement. Therefore, all applicants will normally be asked to pay some portion of the membership fao. 4. Financial assistance can be granted fur up to one year's membership and must be applied for on a year--to-year basis. APPLICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS 1. Individuals interested in financial assistance must obtain the standard. financial assistance request form (attached to this policy) from the designated branch. 2. Applications are to be completed and signed by the applicant and returned to the branch along with some form of written documentation of need. (Examples of this include prior year IRS 1040 form or the State Human Services identification number,) 3. The YNCA will'determine the amount of subsidy granted to the applicant and notify them by mail. 3+ 06/01/92 12:38 YMCA ST PALL, MN 005 4. If additional information is needed by the YMCA to assess the needs of the applicant, the YMCA may request additional information or request that the applicant vchedule a personal interview with the branch axacutive or his/her designated branch staff person. 5. Applicants must complete all standard YMCA enrollment forms to participate in progratus and pay any member program fees unlace special financial assistance is granted for program participation. 6. Branch eXecutives must approve/sign all financial assistance grants. 7. All financial assistance records will be kept confidential. B. The YMCA will grant financial aid to the extent that funds are available. The YHC& reserves the right to refuse financial assistance to any applicant. 9. Financial Assistance applicants will be provided specific information regarding appeal or reapplication if financial assistance is denied. Recommended/Reviewed by General Office Staff November 11,.__1986 Recommended by Operations Council December 29. 1986 Adopted by Executive CommiLLee of General Board January 7. 1987 With Guidelines chart revised annually by Operations Council Recommended by Financial Assistance Task Force: May, 1988 Recommended by Operations Council: May 23, 1988 Approved by General board: June 1. 1988 Reviewed/Recommended by Executive Management Team September-17, 1991 Recommended by Operations Council S ptomor 23, 1921 .Adopted by General Board octobor 2, 1991 35. 06/01/92 12:38 YMCA ST PAIL, MN 006 ....ter-.^- ~ • YMCA OF GREATER SAINT PAUL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SUBSIDY I TTDELINES APRIL, 1992 Gross Annual Income 1,cvel Number in Family 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 $ 6,000 80% 8,000 60% 80% 10,000 65% 60% 80% 12,000 25% 45% 60% 80% 14,000 15% 251 45% 60% 80% 16,000 05% 15% 401 60% 60% 80% 18,000 0% 05% 30% 40% 60% 60% 80% 20,000 0% 0% 20% 40% 45% 60% 60% 22,000 0% 0% 05% 20% 40% 45% 60% 24,000 0% 0% 0% 05% 40% 40% 45% 26,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 40% 30,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 32,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 05% 20% 20% 34,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 20% 36,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 05% 10% 40,000 0% 0% 0% 0% 020 0% 05% These guidelines should be reviewed in March, 1993- MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 29,1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR YMCA 1ST ADDITION-OPUS CORPORATION. PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for one lot of approximately 20.2 acres for a YMCA facility along with three outlots totaling 21.4 acres for future industrial development. The development parcel is located in the southeast corner of Highway 149 and Opperman Drive just south of the United Parcel Service in Section 13. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and or a cash dedication requirement to meet the water quality standards set by the City. The Commission should also make a recommendation on a wetlands filling and replacement proposal. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This development would be located in drainage basin G about .8 miles south of Burr Oak Park (Figure 1). Runoff from development will eventually reach Burr Oak Pond (Pond GP-1), a 10 acre lake in Burr Oak Park designated as a Class II indirect contact recreation water body in the city's water quality management plan. Analysis indicates that without on-site ponding to treat runoff from the site after it becomes fully developed, significant degradation of water quality in Burr Oak Pond would result. Current city policy is to take measures to avoid further degradation in the water quality of any recreational classified lakes as a result of new development. Therefore, on-site ponding should be considered to meet this lake protection objective. Analysis using the city's water quality management model indicates that the minimum pond size required to meet water quality treatment requirements for the entire site under the proposed land uses is .92 acres in surface area, 4.6 acre-feet in volume, and 5 feet in mean depth at the normal water level. WETLANDS ANALYSIS In February 1992, the applicant compiled a site inventory of wetlands from soil surveys, topographic maps, and aerial photos. 31. This was followed by a field investigation in April, 1992, the accuracy of which was verified by city staff in May 1992. Three natural wetlands were located on the property including a .8 acre forested wetland in the north central portion of the site, a 2.2 acre emergent wet meadow in the center of the parcel, and a .5 acre shrub wetland in the southwest part of the site. In addition, two small dug wetland basins were located on the property which together total about 700 square feet. The developer proposes to avoid filling or draining the two largest wetlands on-site, but wants to fill the .5 acre shrub wetland and the two small dug wetlands. The Wetlands Conservation Act requires replacement of these filled wetlands on an acre-for-acre basis during the interim program, so the developer would use the .9 acre water quality treatment pond to meet the replacement requirement. With this configuration, the middle of the site would be used for the preserved wetlands and the water quality pond and the perimeter of the site for developed uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the developer be subject to a water quality ponding requirement to protect Burr Oak Pond and that the wetlands preservation and replacement proposal be approved. The pond design must be approved by city staff. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator FIGUR" [ E a M= I (L t 1 -ate c~u 7 co > n O ` in (n P4 a. _j :D um(e) _ a> to> 3nr WV 13C aJ w T 7-1 CL _j .91 t If I _tk co \j > a '--j T ti P7 Pip 0 ILI roooo-P 0 a. Fri ui u a. _j W -2 •N N r, o- a n.J T ! > V . O~ti I t.~ rv~~ J a. cx. -j 4 I UJI ~..4j 1 ~ti1 I ~l~Cs L~ t ` a 0. --31 1 W 0 (i a E (K) > CL Q. 1x, >It W J V W ?n _ ~1 N T Syr' ---T a J J r~ O. a -11 > c T ~ M fo Zilrr, / I _ ~ J > l . J , a D So ' IL'U ~ 3 j ~ ~ 12.1. T ~ ~ W ~ ~+Z1. . , ' ---•~--1 i~U Jill~j1l I1I1!i! IIIfl IIII Ilil fill iIH t ' ••.gn•rq,pn•y• 11 1 ;Ij wwfUre on,wn . Il1Vtl1"' 38VMV1301 1 I E9 ON OVOH AINnO] 1 I , hull l,. 344VAQI • , 1. 1. - . . I l . - : ' f i-- r - i.w• l 11 s ice.. - - .•t.- - - - • i ,;hi_n l r'--rY'r, +'~il f ! .•r•e•+.tr~ .•.'/T'~r_!•,'" - _ f"t`r • •r i ta'i ( r"~ IbT }F ,I ~ 1 i rti '_3 ~~l ~ •.u r~• i____ ~ ' 1'~r ...1 ~l , ~ i ' ' ! t I J ' ' i . • 1 , ` i ; , - 1 - 1. 01 OCK 1. , ~ I[I , 1 1 ~rI• n'~aa~ •~r• 'n• L-t.. ;Jt~=~~.r fir, o,,..•. •o - ,1 ~ LJ LOCATION OF TREATMENT POND Y 1. 01 1 i ' ! f ' ,Y f NO OP <<. ' Sep S • •'~rw•1i''.'l_!ff~~'•''. ' r~9i.. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: MAY 29, 1992 RE: OVERVIEW OF AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees disabled people access to employment, public accommodations, transportation, public services and telecommunications. President George Bush signed the law July 26, 1990. Considered landmark legislation, the ADA provides for the first time comprehensive federal civil rights protection for people with disabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) extends federal civil rights protection in several areas to people who are considered "disabled". Built upon a body of existing legislation, particularly the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the act states its purpose as providing "a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities." The ADA is not an affirmative action statute. Instead, it seeks to dispel stereotypes and assumptions about disabilities, and to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living and economic self-sufficiency for disabled people. To achieve these objectives, the law prohibits cities from excluding people from jobs, services, activities or benefits based on disability. The law provides penalties for discrimination. Not every disabled person is covered by the ADA. Certain standards must be met for a person to qualify for the act's protection. To be considered "disabled" under the ADA, a person must have a condition that impairs a major life activity or a history of such a condition, or be regarded as having such a condition. A disabled person must also be qualified for the job, program or activity to which he or she seeks access. To be qualified under the ADA, a disabled person must be able to perform the essential functions of a job or meet the essential eligibility requirements of the program or benefit, with or without an accommodation to his or her condition. The ADA has five titles, which cover employment, public services and transportation, public accommodations, telecommunications, and miscellaneous provisions. The two titles which effect cities are primarily Title I and II. DISABILITIES ACT PAGE TWO MAY 29, 1992 o Employment (Title I) - The ADA prohibits employers with 15 or more employees (25 or more workers for the first two years after the effective date) from discriminating against qualified job applicants and workers who are or become disabled. The law covers all aspects of employment, including the application process and hiring, on-the- job training, advancement and wages, benefits, and employer-sponsored social activities. A qualified disabled person is someone who, with or without a reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the job in question. An employer must provide reasonable accommodations for disabled workers, unless that would impose an undue hardship on the employer. o Public Services and Transportation (Title II) - Title II of the ADA prohibits state and local governments from discriminating against disabled people in their programs and activities. The ADA has set time frames in which cities are required to comply. 1. ADA coordinator must be designated as of January 26, 1992. 2. A grievance procedure that provides for the submission and resolution 'of complaints must be established as of January 26, 1992. 3. A self-evaluation of programs and activities must be completed by January 26, 1993. 4. All non-structural changes to provide program accessibility must be begun as of January 26, 1992. 5. A transition plan outlining necessary structural changes must be completed July 26, 1992. 6. Public entities must notify beneficiaries and employees that they do not discriminate on the basis of disability. All such notices must be accessible to those with impaired vision and hearing. Recruitment materials or publications for program participants, beneficiaries, applicants and employees must contain an appropriate non- discrimination statement. This applied as of January 26, 1992. 7. Structural changes identified in the transition plan must be completed by January 26, 1995. To date, Holly Duffy, Eagan Personnel Director, was designated the ADA Coordinator. A grievance procedure is established. An ADA committee is currently evaluating City programs, activities and facilities for accessibility. This overview is, information, requiring no Commission action. The ADA implementation process may require future Commission evaluation and recommendation regarding an accessibility philosophy, funding prioritization, program and facility adaptation. SS/DP/bls 'Z MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCE COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 27, 1992 SUBJECT: SURVEY RESULTS RELATED TO REGULATING THE USE OF FERTILIZERS IN EAGAN INTRODUCTION At it's April meeting, the Commission discussed the issue of the availability of low- and no- phosphorus fertilizer and inquired as to the usefulness of an ordinance that would regulate the level of phosphorus in fertilizer used within the city limits. To provide some useful background for discussion of the subject, city staff have conducted a limited survey of both retail outlets and commercial fertilizer applicators to help determine the present availability of low- and no-phosphorus fertilizers and provide information on related issues. Fertilizer control ordinances of other cities in the Metro area were also examined to provide information on regulatory practices already in use. Finally, the results of a small lawn soil nutrient testing project conducted last fall in the Berry Patch Park area are presented. Findings related to all three issues are summarized below. SURVEY RESULTS As part of this investigation, staff conducted a brief survey in April of seven retail outlets in Eagan that sell lawn and garden supplies, including fertilizer. A copy of the survey is attached. A summary of the most significant survey results is presented below. • No-phosphorus Fertilizer is not sold by any of the retailers surveyed. In explaining why they did not carry phosphorus-free fertilizer, five retailers explained that it was simply not available to their retail outlet, while two had said they had received no request to carry that type of product. • Just over 75% of the fertilizer stocked at surveyed retail outlets contains between 3% and 4% phosphorus, while 15% of the stock contained. more than 4% phosphorus. Only 10% of the fertilizer stocked contains 2% or less of phosphorus. • Six of the seven retailers found acceptable the possible city ordinance limiting phosphorus in lawn fertilizers to 3% to 4%. Each thought that starter fertilizers, which usually have a significantly higher percentage of phosphorus compounds to stimulate early root growth and new turf, should be exempt from the regulation. 43. In addition to the survey of retail outlets, staff also contacted five commercial applicators that operate in Eagan. Again, a copy of the survey is attached and a summary of the major findings are presented below. • Among the five commercial applicators surveyed, just under 40% of the fertilizer sold is phosphorus-free. Another 40% of the fertilizer they sell contains between 1% and 2% phosphorus and only about 20% contains 3% or more phosphorus. • All commercial applicators claimed that precautions such as spreader guards, deflectors, and sweeping were routinely used to keep fertilizers off hard surfaces. All survey respondents claimed they stressed this issue during training. • Four of the five surveyed companies said that they did not routinely conduct soil nutrient test as a precursor to fertilizer application. EXISTING COMMUNITY REGULATORY PROGRAMS In addition to the survey of retailer and commercial applicators, staff looked at what other cities in the Metro area are doing regarding regulation of lawn care chemical use. The cities of Shoreview, Roseville and Bloomington all have some form of ordinance to regulate lawn chemical application. A summary of these ordinances follows. City of Bloomington - The Bloomington ordinance was adopted in April 1987 and is aimed entirely at regulation of herbicide and pesticide use. It's principle component is a permanent program which requires all applicators to get an operating permit from the city each year, requires proper training, safety precautions and record keeping to be practiced in the application and disposal of these chemicals, permits inspections by city staff, and requires posting of treated property. City of Shoreview - This ordinance was first adopted in March 1985. The most notable components of this program are that it limits the allowable phosphorus content of granular fertilizer to 3% or less, limits total application to no more than .5 pounds per thousand square feet per year, prohibits deposition of fertilizer on impervious surface or within 10 feet of a waterbody, limits application of fertilizer during the year to between April 15th and November 15th, and requires licensure of commercial applicators by the city as well as posting of a performance bond and testing of fertilizer formulations to be used. Shoreview also has an ordinance regulating lawn herbicide and pesticide application. ft. City of Roseville - The City of Roseville ordinance was adopted in October, 1987 and is similar to Shoreview's. The major differences are that the amount of phosphorus that can be applied to new turf in the first year is not limited and that random sampling and testing of commercial lawn fertilizer formulas by the city is allowed. LAWN TESTING RESULTS There is very limited information available regarding the nutrient content of residential lawn soils in Eagan. During the fall of 1991, however, the city did cooperate with neighborhood volunteers in the vicinity of Berry Ridge Park to collect and analyze soil samples from 35 yards. The results of the test showed that 20 yards (57%) contained adequate soil phosphorus, 13 yards (37%) required a supplemental phosphorus addition of .5 pounds per thousand square feet, and 2 yards (6%) required an additional one pound of phosphorus per 1,000 feet to reach recommended soil phosphorus levels. While there are a number of lawn care factors that could help explain these results, the data do indicate that in this typical residential neighborhood, over 40% of the lawn soils tested needed some supplemental phosphorus. SUMMARY This memo provides some limited information that the Commission may find helpful in examining the attractiveness of combining a regulatory approach with our existing education program to protect Eagan lake resources from the impacts associated with lawn chemical use. Staff will be prepared to discus the findings and answer questions at the Commission meeting in June. Rich Brasch Water Resource Coordinator RB/nab Attachments 4b:aprnrc. 150 Lawn Fertilizer survey-Retail outlets (April, 1992) 1. Store Name: 2. Contact Person/Spokesman: 3. Date of Contact: 4. Fertilizer Blends Carried in Store: Blend (N-P-K) % of Total Carried Costs/Coverage 5. Is it. accurate to assume that sales of different blends for past years are proportional to stocked supply this year? 6. Noted any changes in phosphorus content of fertilizer sold over past 5 years? 7. No-phosphorus fertilizers: Do you carry any? If not, why not? If custoiaers wanted some, how could they get it through you? How much would it cost (cost/unit coverage)? If the cost is significantly more than conventional fertilizer, why? 46. 8. Please identify how you would view the following proposal: a. City ordinance banning any phosphorus in lawn fertilizer used in the City? b. City ordinance limiting phosphorus in lawn fertilizer to 3-4%? 9. Might you be interested in working with the City to disseminate point-of-sale information on "lake friendly" lawn care practices? 41. Lawn Fertilizer survey-Commercial Applicators (April, 1992) 1. Company Name and Office Location: 2. Contact/Spokesperson: 3. Date of Contact: 4. Lawn Fertilizer Blends Sold: Blend (N-P-K) Liq.or Gran.? % Volume Costs/Coverage 5. Any precautions -taken by applicators to keep fertilizer off hard surfaces? Specify. 6. Is #5 stressed in any training by the company? If not, could it be? 7. Do you routinely conduct a soils nutrient test to determine > application requirements? If not, why not? 8. No-phosphorus fertilizers: Do you carry any? If not, why not? If customers wanted some, how could they get it through you? How much would it cost (cost/unit coverage)? If the cost is significantly more than conventional fertilizer, why? 40• 9. How would do you think your company would view the following proposals? a. City ordinance banning any phosphorus in lawn fertilizer used in Eagan? b. City ordinance limiting phosphorus in lawn fertilizer to 3-4%? Other notes (including opportunities for city to work with them in educating applicators): MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 27, 1992 SUBJECT: REPORT ON "USE OF LAWN CHEMICALS IN THE TWIN CITIES" BY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Attached is the Executive Summary from a report that was quoted in the press several weeks ago regarding lawn chemical use in the Twin Cities Metro area. While the report contains much interesting information, there are two aspects in particular that are particularly applicable to our efforts in Eagan. First, the environmental survey conducted by the city last spring suggests that fertilizer use by Eagan residents is more frequent than that indicated by this study for the metro area as a whole. While the University of Minnesota study reports that 72% of survey respondents applied fertilizers and/or weed killer to their lawns, 95% of the respondents to the Eagan survey indicated they applied at least some fertilizers to their yards each year. Second, the University study suggests that residents in an environmentally sensitive area adjacent to Lake Minnetonka appeared to use significantly less fertilizer than the Metro area average. The study suggests that increased awareness of residents to off- site impacts caused by fertilizer may best explain this trend. If true, this finding indicates that public education is effective in changing behavior where the connection between that behavior and the condition of a valued resource can be made. No commission action is requested for this item. The study will be discussed briefly at the June meeting. At that time, please let staff know if you have any questions on the report summary or would like a copy of the full 21 page report. '2 Rich Brasch Water Resource Coordinator RB/nab 4b:aprnrc.149 S t. l USE OF LAWN CHEMICALS IN THE TWIN CITIES by Jared R. Creason and C. Ford Runge Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (612) 625-9208 April 1992 This report will be published as #7 in the Public Report Series by the Water Resources Research Center, University of Minnesota. Our thanks to Dr. Ted Graham-Tomasi for his help in preparation of the survey and to Dr. Patrick Brezonik for his assistance in publication. This study was conducted under Minnesota Experiment Station Grant 377-1264, with partial support from the Northwest. Area Foundation, St. Paul, Minnesota. The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 5L. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Regulations affecting the use and sale of agricultural chemicals have increased in number and complexity in recent years, in recognition of the potentially adverse effects that improper use can have on soil, water, plant, and human ecosys- tems. Many of these chemicals are distributed in urban areas for use by the general public on lawns. To date, these nonagricultural uses have received relatively less scrutiny than farm uses. Yet lawn chemical in urban areas use brings these products into closer contact with humans and animals than occurs in many farming areas. Urban landscapes are specifically designed to direct runoff into surface water systems through drains, gutters and storm sewers, making the impact of lawn chemical use of particular interest to those charged with monitoring surface water quality in the Mississippi River system and the more then 400 lakes in. the Twin Cities area. A survey of residents of the Twin Cities area was conducted to gather data and information about use of lawn care chemicals, including fertilizers and pesticides. To the authors knowledge, this is one of the first such efforts in the nation, and the first in the Twin Cities. This study contains estimates, based on survey results, of the total quantities of fertilizers and pesticides applied in the metro area, as well as a summary and interpretation of several factors indicated by the survey that could have significant ramifications for public policy. We stress that these data represent only an initial attempt to learn more about urban lawn chemical use, and suggest the importance of follow up studies. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS • Use of lawn fertilizer used in the Twin Cities in 1990 averaged approximately 36 lbs. per household. Those respondents who applied fertilizer used about 27 percent less than the amount recommended by some turf specialists, and 28 percent of respondents used none at all. • While more information on pesticide applications would be desirable, the survey indicated application rates which are similar to non-urban agricultural use. • The quantities of lawn chemicals purchased are not strongly responsive to changes in their price, suggesting that public policies designed to raise this price through taxes or fees would not substantially reduce the quantities demanded (although they would raise revenues). Hence a "pollution tax" applied to lawn chemicals will not be effective in reducing use unless it is very large. i S3. • Attitudes of residents in the metro area toward ground and surface water pollution are very similar to those sampled in an earlier survey of farmers (MCSR, 1990). This indicates the existence of a broad consensus of opinion from which public policy regarding chemicals can be crafted. Both urban and rural residents support limitations to reduce the harmful effects of agricultural chemicals. • Results of a subsample of respondents living on or near Lake Minnetonka indicate that applications of fertilizer may be much lower there than in the metro area as a whole, suggesting sensitivity of residents in an area vulnerable to water quality damages to the impacts of lawn chemical use. RECOMMENDATIONS • Regulation. While we are unable, as a result of this work, to show a need for strict regulation, we are able to show that "pollution taxes" would likely have minimal effect on use, although the revenues raised could be directed to education or further study. • Education. Respondents in an environmentally sensitive sub- sample report using significantly less fertilizer than the metro average. This may be explained by increased local awareness of off-site effects. This suggests that information campaigns aimed at increasing best management practices such as home lawn and garden soil tests may be effective in reducing over-application of chemicals. • Monitoring and Further Study. The survey uncovered some unexpected similarities and differences between urban and rural groups, suggesting that both groups would support additional monitoring of urban and rural chemical use, and further study into the impacts of the chemicals on urban and rural residents. Any attempt to forge public policy on environmental issues will benefit from the existence of an apparent consensus on rural and urban use of agricultural chemicals. ii 54. . MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MAY 29, 1992 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON WATER QUALITY MITIGATION FOR LAKEVIEW TRAILS ADDITION At its May meeting, the Commission reviewed a memo which outlined water quality mitigation associated with the proposed Lakeview Trails Addition west of Highway 3 in the northeast quarter of Section 36. The proposed mitigation involved the construction of two (2) nutrient detention basins on-site to treat run-off from the development in order to protect water quality in Pond LP-26, a Class II 13-acre lake. As part of the motion on water quality mitigation for the development, the Commission requested that staff work with the developer to increase the paved area of the development draining to nutrient detention basin LP-26.1 in the south central portion of the development. After phone conversations with the developer's technical representative on May 12th and 14th, the developer has agreed to move about 200 feet to the west the slope break of the street entering the proposed subdivision from Dodd Road. Under the original site plan, drainage from this 200 feet of street would have discharged to a ditch along Dodd Road, eventually reaching Pond LP-26 via overland drainage. With the proposed change, all runoff from hard surfaces which drain from the development to LP-26 will be treated by the two NURP basins that will be constructed as part of this subdivision. This revision will be incorporated in the plan submission for final plat. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/sb 28wp:advis.148 55 ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS MAY 26, 1992 1.*« On Saturday May 16, the Park Maintenance, Forestry and Water Quality Divisions participated in the City's first annual Public Works Celebration event. An Open House was held at the public works building between 11:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. featuring informational displays, equipment operation, hay rides, door prizes, free lunch, etc. The event was extremely successful, with more than 600 people from the community attending the open house. A special thanks goes to all of our maintenance personnel who spent considerable time and energy cleaning and organizing equipment and shop facilities prior to the event. 2.*« Dakota County Adult Sentence to Serve Program completed three weeks of work in Eagan Parks in late April and early May. During that time they completely stained the exterior of 15 shelter buildings, stained and repainted 14 hockey rinks and performed surface amendments to 15 playgrounds. The crew will be returning to Eagan Parks in late May and early June to continue on playground maintenance and to assist in refurbishing some of the City's older ballfields. The total labor commitment to the Parks and Recreation Department is expected to reach nearly 2,000 hours or the equivalent of one full-time labor position. 3.*<< We are again working at the Trapp Farm Park playground. Steve Hadden, Paul Szeurek, Maintenance Staff, are taking a lead role in this project. The boardwalk has been completed and work will now begin on planter boxes and seeding areas. It is expected that the Twin Cities Tree Trust will also be assisting in the completing of the playground perimeters and planter boxes in early June. For the benefit of the Commission, the Twin Cities Tree Trust is a non-profit organization which coordinates the employment of disadvantaged youth under State and Federal Youth Employment Programs. Municipal and County agencies are primary participants in this program. The City of Eagan has been a host agency for the last ten years. 4.*« Identification signs were installed at various points to the Highline Trail, along the road, in Rahn Athletic Park and at the entrance to Downing Park. 5.c< In a cooperative agreement with School District # 196, 12 new athletic benches were installed at the Dakota Hills Middle School and Northview Elementary School fields. This project was aided by the Adult Sentence to Serve Program. The fields are used by the City of Eagan and many athletic leagues for various athletic functions. 6.*« The City's mowing program got into full swing in early May. The program consists of four groundsmaster mower routes, one gang mower route and one high capacity route. The maintenance department maintains approximately 340 acres per week at park locations and various picnic buildings and grounds. 5?. 7.*« The Department's Spring Turf Program was also completed during the month. This included overseeing of the winter skating sites, broad leaf weed spraying, fertilization of parks and municipal building sites and aeration of athletic fields. The City's irrigation systems at Rahn, Northview, Ohmann and Goat Hill Athletic Parks also went into full operation in mid-May. 8. * « Routine Park Maintenance activities continue through the month of May. These included monthly playground inspections and bi-weekly tennis and hardcourt inspections, refuse maintenance, athletic field striping and set-up, and shelter building cleaning/maintenance. 9.*0 In addition to the routine maintenance and ball diamond dragging at athletic sites, special efforts were made by the Parks Maintenance staff the week preceding Memorial week-end for the EAA Regional Soccer Tournament in the City of Eagan. Staff prepared fields at Ohmann and Northview Parks, along with five soccer field overlays at the Eagan High School/Middle School complex. A special thanks goes to Scott Eppen and Gary Skogstad for their work in making these preparations. 10.*« On Saturday, May 2nd, Park Maintenance employees Paul Graham and Alex Lammers assisted with set-up for the Eagan Fun Run event. In addition, Paul and Alex also assisted with clean-up of park sites following the Volunteer City Clean-Up Day. 11.<< Also on Saturday, May 2nd, the Eagan Forestry Division conducted the 4th Annual Municipal Tree Sale at the maintenance facility on Coachman Road between the hours of 7:30 A.M. and 12:00. More than 350 families purchased 700 bare root trees and conifers for planting in residential areas. The tree sale continues to be a very successful event with many positive comments from our constituents. 12.*« Another major focus of activity for the Forestry Division in the month of May was the implementation of landscape plantings. Work continued on tree and shrub installation at the Municipal Center, Wescott Station Park and Northview Tennis Courts. Planting also took place at the entrance to the Rahn Athletic building, with assistance through a donation from the Lutheran Brotherhood Organization. 13.*<< In anticipation of the grading contract for Blackhawk Park this summer, staff has been busy with moving planting stock out of Blackhawk Park nursery. These trees have been moved into various locations within the park system. 14.*« On Wednesday, May 13, a large Black Hills Spruce tree was moved from a private residence to a location on the north side of the pond at Northview Athletic Fields. 15. * << The Department took delivery on three major pieces of equipment during the month of May; a 55 HP Ford Model #630 tractor with attachments, replacing the 1972 tractor, a 2200 gallon flusher unit replacing a 1975 flusher truck, and a new high capacity 16 foot wide Toro 580-D rotary mower. The mower will be the second unit of its kind purchased from Toro in the past two years. The 580-D represents a new development in technology, outperforming traditional 72 inch rotary mowers and pull behind mowers. The combined value of these purchases is approximately $171,000. 16.* < Registration for summer programs began on Saturday, May 16. The first day registration resulted in over 1,400 entries onto the data base. To date, approximately 2,100 registrations have been data entered. Each day results in nearly 100 new registrants. Data entry is 3 to 4 days behind at this time. Charging a fee for the summer playground program has had no appreciable impact on registrations. The 5 year old Instructional T-ball program has been very popular. Summer Fun Day trips for 11-15 year olds have received significant attention. The Department has requested increased numbers of tickets for several of the activities. 17. * < The Department hosted three new events in the past week. o The Eagan Invitational Soccer Tournament provided tournament play for 45 teams. o Maintenance overlaid and striped 5 fields at Eagan High to augment fields at Ohmann and Northview to accommodate the tournament. o Coordination among EAA, the high school and the Department went smoothly and professionally. o The Department hosted the Region 1AA girls softball playdowns at Northview Athletic. Numerous compliments were received regarding the facility and the efficiency of the operation in general. o Eagan High played one Region IAA baseball game at Goat Hill Park. 18.*« Sand Volleyball Leagues will play on Monday and Friday evenings this summer. To date 18 teams are registered. Ten (10) teams participated a year ago. 19.*« The Kids Fishing Derby will be held on Saturday, June 6 at Fish Lake Park. The department anticipates 75-100 youth. The event features a casting contest. Prizes are rods and reels provided by Zebco. 20. * « The senior citizens annual picnic will be held at Trapp Farm Park on June 10. Seniors from Rosemount and Apple Valley have been invited to the event. 21.* < Looking ahead to Eagan Athletic Association fall activities, NYSCA Coaches Certification Clinics will be planned for late July. 22. * < A USTA Jr. Tennis Tournament will be held at Northview Athletic in mid-June. Players from throughout the metro area are likely to participate. 5,. 23.*< Evening in the Park performances begin on June 24. The first event will feature the Teddy Bear Band. A crowd of 400-500 people will come to Trapp Farm Park for this event. 24.*« For the first time in several years, two adult soccer teams were assigned field space in Eagan. The teams play in the Minnesota Recreational Soccer League. In addition, 21 youth teams and 22 Bantam teams are playing on Eagan facilities. 25.* < Spring recreational programs are officially all completed. The last session of Dog Obedience Training on May 28 was the closer. Of course, adult softball, a spring/summer activity continues. And, the first summer activity, golf lessons begins on June 1st! 26. * « A new line item for recreation programs in the 1993 budget will be an accounting of estimated costs for interpreters and other assistance for disabled persons as proscribed by ADA. 27.*« Delivery of the storage boxes for athletic sites is eminent! They will be placed at the High School and Middle School to enable youth teams to be more self sufficient. *City Council - June 2, 1992 *Commission meeting - June 4, 1992 0. MEMO TO: EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: JUNE 2, 1992 SUBJECT: SHELTER RESTROOM HOURS The purpose- of this memorandum is to briefly update the Commission on the status of the City's policy relative to the opening of park shelter building restrooms for general usage of the public. This memo is strictly for informational purposes and no action is required. Background As the Commission may know, prior to 1987, the City operated only one shelter building located at Rahn Park on Sandstone Drive. That particular facility was constructed in 1975 and served as the central location for children's recreation programs, reserved community use, and as a permanent warming shelter for the Rahn Park skating and pleasure rinks. Because the restrooms at that location lacked a direct exterior access, however, the building was operated for City staffed and programmed functions. Following passage of the Parks Bond Referendum in 1983, the City began to actively pursue the planning and development of neighborhood and community parks to serve the needs of a fast- growing community. During that public input process, policy decisions were made concerning the provision and future location of permanent shelter buildings for the parks and recreation system. Based on desires expressed by the residents for group picnic facilities, additional enclosed skating shelters, and space for reserved use and neighborhood gatherings, the City turned its attention toward the construction of neighborhood park shelter buildings beginning in the mid-1980's. From 1986 to the present, 10 new shelter buildings and four pavilion/sun shelters have been constructed. Many of these shelter buildings are located at the City's athletic facilities and serve the needs for organized softball, baseball and soccer usage. Other shelters, however, are located in neighborhood parks and community parks (such as Sky Hill, Ohmann, Bridle Ridge and Trapp Farm, to name a few) where playground and other open space facilities are readily available to families and children from surrounding neighborhoods. When the first new generation of shelter buildings were completed in 1986/1987, the City made a policy decision to only open the shelter restrooms for reserved uses, scheduled athletic events and recreation programs when a park attendant could be scheduled to provide the necessary janitorial and security services. This system seemed to work fairly well in the early stages when the parks were somewhat less well-known and levels of usage significantly lower than they are today. Few complaints were heard from the public about the restrooms being locked during the daytime or evening hours. As the levels of use in the public parks continued to increase (due to public awareness, population growth, etc.), the demands for extended restroom hours at the community and neighborhood parks 41 were being voiced on a more regular basis to the Parks and Recreation Department. In response in 1989, the City altered its policy on restroom hours to the extent that many of the park shelter building restrooms were opened for general public usage on Friday evenings and on the weekends. The primary concerns of staff at that time for not extending shelter hours to the daytime and weekday evenings was the additional inherent cost, potential for vandalism during unsupervised hours, increased janitorial expenses and questioned value given lower levels of use. With continued and increasing pressure from the public, a decision was made last year to extend the shelter building hours to the weekday evenings, at most locations, during the summer months. Logistically, this procedure was handled through the park and ballfield attendants who were normally scheduled to work during those hours in support of adult and youth athletic programs and reserved pavilion usage. This change in practice did increase, marginally, the cost of additional staff time and some increased janitorial time. However, the track record related to vandalism was very good and did not appear to be as relevant a concern as originally expected. 1992 Shelter Buildinng, Policy As early as March of this year, staff began to receive a number of calls from parents who were concerned that the shelter restrooms were not opened during the daytime hours in parks where children and families frequented playground apparatus. In response to these public inquiries, in addition to general increased levels of usage throughout the park system, a decision has been made to expand our program of opening the restrooms of the park shelter buildings. Under our expanded program, all shelter restrooms (with the exception of Northview and Rahn) will be opened during the daytime hours, Monday through Friday, utilizing our regular maintenance personnel. Cleaning and security of the buildings will be the responsibility of the operation staff (park and ballfield attendants) who work during the evening and weekend hours. For the information of the Commission, the following schedule has been established for the 1992 season from Memorial weekend through Labor Day weekend: Parks Restroom Hours Bridle Ridge Monday-Friday, 11 a.m.-9 p.m. Goat Hill Saturday-Saturday and Holidays 9 a.m.-9 p.m. Ohmann (all parks listed) Quarry Sky Hill Thomas Lake Trapp Farm While we recognize that the expanded service will result in some increase in expenditures (operations personnel and cleaning supplies), we also feel that the improved level of customer service, combined with optimized use of the buildings will far outway these additional costs. The expanded hours have been well received by the public in the past and we expect the same to be true under this new policy. 42.. 4- SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT ROHLFS 1ST ADDITION APPLICANT: ROBERT ROHLF LOCATION: SE QUARTER SECTION 18 P.I.D. #10-01800-030-78 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 5, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for one lot of approximately one-half acre located along Wuthering Heights Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 18. BACKGROUND: A request for a building permit on an unplatted parcel made the Community Development Department aware of the applicant's desire to erect a manufactured home on the parcel. City staff is unauthorized to grant a building permit on unplatted property, therefore this item was sent to the February 21 City Council meeting. At that meeting, Bill Jones representing the Owner, Mr. Robert Rohlf, requested special consideration to process the building permit due to severe time constraints which could potentially cause a substantial delay and expense to the owner. The Council approved the issuance of the building permit, with a condition that the property be platted. Occupancy of the home was granted in early-May. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The one-half acre lot is located to the north of Silver Bell Road along Wuthering Heights Road, south and east of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant, and west of the Silver Bell apartments. The surrounding land uses are Industrial to the north and unplatted R-1 (Single Family) immediately surrounding the site with R-4 zoning to the west. The Land Use Guide Plan identifies the entire area between the Chicago Northwestern Railroad and State Highway #13 as Industrial. The house has been constructed and a Certificate of Occupancy has been granted. The lot itself is 21,375 sq. ft. or .491 acres. The house meets, or exceeds, all setback and lot coverage requirements. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication at their June 7 meeting. '3. A GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing gravel street which serves this one-lot subdivision is slightly higher than the house, therefore, the drainage needs to be conveyed to the side lot line and then to the backyard. The lot should be seeded or sodded as soon as possible to prevent erosion of the site. WATER DUALITY: This preliminary plat will be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality requirements. Using the methodology established in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, the amount of the dedication is estimated at $353 based on a pond surface area of 0.014 acres, a pond volume of 0.035 acre-feet, and the cash dedication schedule for single-family residential land. This recommendation is subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main service of adequate depth and capacity is readily available to serve the proposed lot. An 8" sanitary sewer line and 6" water main was constructed in Wuthering Heights Road in the early 1980's. A 4" sanitary sewer and 1" water service was provided to the lot when the sewer and water in the street was constructed. There is a hydrant in the southeast corner of the lot that will provide adequate fire protection for this area. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the lot is currently available from Wuthering Heights Road, a privately maintained gravel street that runs along the south edge of the lot. The private street connects to Silver Bell Road approximately 600 feet from the proposed lot. The increase in use of this private street by the addition of a single-family home does not warrant the upgrade of the roadway to City standards. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - ROHLFS 1ST ADDITION Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections and/or availability to the City's utility system. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .069 S.F. 21,375 S.F. $1,475 The parcel has a payoff balance of $887 on existing special assessments. There is no pending assessment on the property at this time. CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR ROHLFS 1ST ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B3, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, & H1 VS• STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, pcnding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. (4. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. pater Ouality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS #2 I{~+/ Rohlfs First Addition 6~ ± ~0 t / 90 STREET MAP sS SE HA L'MJ1S 10 4QJ %R j ~+]Y 4yER BE y~{sl 1 .w ~1 1 'M N w~/ONAI .E i 51A. `'p 31) ZONING MAP A 4 u LI Rq oc+ ~ I r,4 LI C$ < {2 CPK P A R-4 IND / 13 BF l~ COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP INO P PF . -no -I 14 L VSENECA sso,~9 , SANITARY SC IfR (Amwfff t 1? PER DOC. W. "170 - r O11 %PA ( 1(~ ` r1ea,Is till c4l • - ° / ~Y' ~ - Vordvn S 11 4 TOO, B• r P Z I LINE W~ r~.f~ ~.'~p%OG oho fy -so PA p oe/;X 41 i on ~ . s 4'i# / ,v. T tio• E d • • • • •-!1 ~:?t~/pro-~A KvnnQOl+~ ~ ~;t-.y 1 „ Ate; _ oto 7e r,C,4r/-r' + ti~ titre ' 84 s o o~ r l,~l h X,0--11 ' ~e~ f ft's 'eo'~ tF J-41OP4 W h ~4' & J• w. 1 rY l lt'rA/?/iI / ti elf -j - 42 ,.re-1 pj1 )1 e)n•1'~ OVo 71 o so"~4 60- T9 t _ 17 v / r2 It. 4. Are 0 ti _ J 71.36 Survey for LEGAL DESCRIPTION JONES COMPANY Commencing at a point 552.2 feet east and 434.48 feet north of the SW comer of Government Lot 7, Section 18, ownshio 27, Range 23, thence angle right N. 50' East a distance of 120.11 feet to the actual point of beginning o 0o a 2 of the tract to be described; thence continue along the last Chdo described line a distance of 95 feet; thence angle left 90' a distance of 225 feet, thence angle left 90' a distance of J7 95 feet, thence angle left 90' a distance of 225 feet to the QO actual point of beginning, and also an easement for the Q0. purooses of ingress and egress and turnabouts by motor 0 vehicles for the benefit of said above described tract as 90. QS fellows: 1. Over an area between the southeasterly line of the above described tract and a line thirty (30) feet to the southeast of and parallel to said southeasterly line, said area being on the southeasterly side of said tract, and over an area within a circle for turnarounds, said circle having a radius of fifty (50) OQ feet, the radius point thereof being the most easterly comer of the above described tract, except that portion ~Oo I I of said circle which falls within said above described O II / tract, and O' 1 ~I R S° 2. Over an area within thirty (30) feet on either side. OQ~ I I \ being a total width of sixty (60) feet. of a line between a point 552.2 feet east of the SW comer of said Government Lot 7, and a point 434.48 feet Gravel Drive north of said first point and of a line between said second point and the most southerly comer of the above described tract, said second line being 120.17 9~ w.. feet in length, i subject to an easement for the purposes of ingress and egress O and tum-grounds by motor vehicles over the most southeasterly O J i thirty (30) feet of the above described tract and over that portion of the above described tract which falls within a circle Q i for said turnarounds, said circle having a radius of fifty (50) /^~•o0j~ feet, the radius point thereof being the most easterly comer of the above described tract. 6 (655 0565 6 64 1? 4 i. 659 er6\ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation q( a( i N I of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and ,a( 0~ of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon. Dated this f6 day of 1992. RENDER AND ASSOC TES, INC. : Point 552.2 feet east of and 434.48 J feet north of the Southwest corner of o Area = 21,375 square feet 0.491 acre). Alvin R. Render, Land Surveyor Government Lot 7 Scale: 1 inch = 40 fe Minnesota Registration Na. 13295 30 JOB NO. Point 552.2 feet east of the South West-..... 30 corner of Government Lot 7 7 0 Denotes Iron Monument Set 1924-1o86.to Rehder and Associates, Inc. -south line of Government Lot • Denotes Iron Monument Found BOOK CML ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS • 38/8 34.0 r"...1 0h. • Sve. 240 • Eogm. 0,11-t. • Ph,.,. (812) 432-5031 0 '4 vti~ - r Building Permit Survey for: LEGAL DESCRIPTION 781.1 c Commencing at a point 552.2 feet east and 434.48 feet S north of the SW comer of Government Lot 7, Section 18. UE KEHOE ''tt 00 A r v A Township 27, Range 23, thence angle right N. 50' East a distance of 120.11 feet to the actual point of beginning ooh OQ a R E V I E W E. fi of the tract to be described; thence continue along the lost G described line a distance of 95 feet; thence angle left 90' S 9h• D ^ a distance of 225 feet, thence angle left 90' a distance of 95 feet, thence angle left 90' a distance of 225 feet to the Do ` _ Z5-11z_ actual point of beginning, and also an easement for the 2ia2 -Geroge 0.. DATE purposes of ingress and egress and turnabouts by motor not stoked) r~ . 3 vehicles for the benefit of said above described tract as r8r3 96. m follows: Q e C • y 1. Over an area between the southeasterly line of the O above described tract and a line thirty (30) feet to s~ }?~f the southeast of and parallel to said southeasterly °s ~O s Cl ~ line, said area being on the southeasterly side of said tract, and over an area within a circle for 1 e o p:om ~pOJS~ b S \ turnarounds. said circle having a radius of fifty (50) V Q r O feet, the radius point thereof being the most easterly p 'mss n O comer of the above described tract, except that portion "e of said circle which falls within said above described tract, and ' \ 7 1t - a1a 2. Over an area within thirty (30) feet on either side, being a total width of sixty (60) feet, of a line between o point 552.2 feet east of the SW comer ~,1 w S of said Government Lot 7, and a point 434.48 feet f4. Grovel 0 've- , north of said first point and of a line between said 1_A0 second point and the most southerly corner of the ,r 9s \ °7 G above described tract, said second line being 120.11 • ! v,tiy/ . 4 90- feet in length, 3 i~ subject to an easement for the purposes of ingress and egress ~s o<NI \ O ! 7853, I and tum-grounds by motor vehicles over the most southeasterly thirty (30) feet of the above described tract and over that portion of the above described tract which falls within a circle for said turnarounds. said circle having a radius of fifty (50) 3;~ GJ• 4~i feet, the radius point thereof being the most easterly comer of the above described tract. tezg o5e 7913 ys 4rr` ~ ~ ~ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation /c4 ( / , ° `Y N I of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and tat o Od6j' of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon. /J~oeo°~ Dated this Z57"day of = REHDER /'N 71 AND ASSOCIATEPoint 552.2 feet eas: of and 434.48.........;,. feet north of the Southwest corner of Y `TO Area = 21,375 square feet 0.491 acre. Alvin R. Rehder, Land Surveyor Government Lot 7 Minnesota Registration No. 13295 30 Scale: 1 inch = 40 fe Jo / NO. Point 55fern east of the SoutA 5t-....... line 0 Denotes Iron Monument Set JOB 924-1086.10 Rehder and Associates, Inc. comer of / Government Lot 7 -South of Government Lot 7 • Denotes Iron Monument Found BOOK CML ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS a Denotes Hub 38/8 3440 r.d" o.+.. • Sol. 240 • E.9nn. LAn-to • Pw,.. (812) 452-5051 ~y i 1o f •1.9~~ Survey for Rohlfs 1st Addition - Robert Rohlf FINANCIAL OBLIGATION moo ° LEGEND °o, STORM SEWER TRUNK •o sroo` : ~J "YYY•: g5~p~/ 00 6 S 50 z°rer . Jo ta( Point 552.2 feet eor or and 434.48 ~ feet north of the Southwest comer or Area = 21,375 square feet 0.491 acre). Government Lot 7 Stole: 1 inch = 40 fe 30 Point 552.2 feet east of the South at....... ....South line of Government Lot 7 O Denotes Iron Monument Set comer of Government Lot 7 • Denotes Iron Monument Found SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT (HAWTHORNE WOODS NORTH) APPLICANT: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 25 P.I.D. #10-03900-050-08 EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL (A) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 18, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 8.8 Agricultural acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 12 lots. The proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designation of D-II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units/acre density). The site is located south of Diffley Road (County Road 30), west of Highway 3, north of the approved Preliminary Plat of Hawthorne Woods Addition, and east of Dodd Road. BACKGROUND: The proposed plat will provide a second access for the 97 lot Hawthorne Woods Preliminary Plat (approved by City Council on February 18, 1992). The two plats combined have 109 lots that will have access to Dodd Road (via Hackmore Drive) and direct access to Diffley Road. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The majority of the site falls from the south towards Diffley Road, however there is a relatively flat low area along the eastern edge of the property that is proposed to be a storm water treatment pond. The site vegetation includes mature significant and secondary woodlands. The southern one-third of the site contains most of the significant tree growth. COMMENTS: The City Code requires an 85' minimum lot width at the building setback line and a minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft. The 12 proposed lots range in size from 18,700 sq. ft. to 35,500 sq. ft. The average lot size is 27,672 sq. ft. and the median lot size is 27,410 sq. ft. All lots meet, or exceed, lot width requirements. Access to all lots will be provided by the extension of Hawthorne Woods Drive. No lots will take direct access from Diffley Road. The developer plans on a limited number of builders for this project. In addition, some of the southern lots may be left for individual grading for a custom lot/house. Due to the range in grades, it appears all lots will accommodate walk-out style homes. 5. • Tree preservation should be achieved with a physical barrier. Protection of trees to be saved during site grading should be enclosed with snow fencing or other suitable material. Also, boulevard trees will be allowed 7' from the back of the curb. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks and Recreation staff will be recommending to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at its June 4, 1992 meeting, that this plat be subject to a cash parks dedication, cash trails dedication, and the development shall be responsible for grading a 10' wide trail corridor east of Hawthorne Woods Drive. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed as a part of this development is limited to that necessary to provide the north/south street connection from the southerly adjacent Hawthorne Woods development and Diffley Road on the north. The area of the lots proposed to be graded is limited to that required to establish a building pad on each lot. The extent of the building'pad grading ranges from 50' - 100' beyond what was necessary to grade the roadway. The development is proposing to provide Pond JP-26.1 as a part of the proposed development. Pond JP-26.1 is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The proposed ponding area is located in the rear lot areas of Lots 1-6, Block 2. The areas tributary to Pond JP-26.1 include 4.6 acres from the Hawthorne Woods North Addition, 24.9 acres from the southerly adjacent Hawthorne Woods development, 11.6 acres from the Autumn Ridge developments which are located southerly of the Hawthorne Woods development and approximately 19 acres of unplatted property adjacent to TH 3. Approximately 3.9 acres from the proposed Hawthorne Woods North Addition will drain directly into the Diffley Road storm sewer system. Proposed Pond JP-26.1 is required to have a minimum surface area of 0.8 acres and a storm water management volume of 8.3 acre feet of storage above the normal water level of the pond. Street grades and sloped areas as proposed are in accordance with City Codes and Standards. The development is responsible for installing and maintaining erosion/sediment control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards. WATER QUALITY The proposed development lies in the upper reaches of storm water management Drainage Basin J. Drainage Basin J includes Fish Lake at the lower end of the basin. The City is proposing to require the development to provide a pond onsite to reduce peak flood flows before they are conveyed to the storm sewer system proposed to be constructed under City Project No. 607 (Diffley Road Street & Utility Improvements). Since the land will be dedicated for ponding purposes, the developer has requested to use this site to satisfy water quality requirements for the proposed Hawthorne Woods North development as well as the southerly adjacent Hawthorne Woods development to the greatest extent possible. The ponding area in this development (JP-26.1) is proposed to be 0.8 acres in surface area. Built to NRP standards, it would have a wet pond volume of approximately 3.7 acre feet below the normal water elevation of the pond. The pond is of sufficient size to adequately treat storm water runoff from approximately 41 acres of single-family residential development. The areas tributary to the proposed ponding area are from the Hawthorne Woods North development, Hawthorne Woods, Autumn Ridge developments and the undeveloped property adjacent to TH 3. The developer proposes to use the treatment capacity of this pond to decrease the cash dedication obligation on the Hawthorne Woods I"/. development. Because the development is in a priority drainage basin and provides the opportunity to treat storm water runoff from a number of different developments using a single pond, staff is recommending that the ponding area be used to satisfy water quality -requirements as well. The water quality cash dedication for Hawthorne Woods would decrease to approximately $12,000. This recommendation is subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient size, depth and capacity is proposed for lateral connection with City Project No. 607 (Diffley Road - Street & Utility Improvements). Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is being provided under City Project 607 (Diffley Road - Streets & Utility Improvements) for lateral connection by this development. Trunk storm sewer is proposed under City Project 607 which provides the outlet for the proposed ponding area of Pond JP-26.1. The development will be required to provide storm sewer stubs to the southerly adjacent properties in two different locations. The first location in the southeasterly corner of proposed Lot 1, Block 2 would provide the storm sewer outlet for the future development of Outlot A of the Hawthorne Woods development. Future development of Outlot A includes the easterly and northerly extension of Eastwood Court from the Hawthorne Woods development. The second storm sewer stub would be in Woods Drive to serve the southerly adjacent Hawthorne Woods development. The storm sewer would connect to the proposed Hawthorne Woods development storm sewer and convey the runoff to Pond JP-26.1. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed development is provided by a north/south through street which connects the southerly adjacent Hawthorne Woods northerly to Diffley Road. The location of the connection to Diffley Road is currently under review by the Dakota County Highway Department. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required to provide a ponding easement over proposed Pond JP-26.1. Additional utility easement will be required for the storm sewer stub located in the easterly side of proposed Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 which provides a storm sewer outlet for the proposed development of Outlot A in the Hawthorne Woods development. Additional utility easement will also be required for the storm sewer currently proposed to be constructed between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. A storm sewer easement will be required across Lot 6, Block 1, which drains the low area on the westerly side of proposed Lot 6. The development is responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired in a time frame as required by the regulatory agency prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - HAWTHORNE WOODS NORTH Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. $720/Lot 12 Lots $8,640 Water Trunk S.F. . $750/Lot 12 Lots 9,000 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. $.069/S.F. 324,270 S.F. 22.375 $40,015 The property has pending assessments totaling $17,665 from Project 607. These pending assessments will be pro-rated to the lots created by the plot. CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HAWTHORNE WOODS NORTH: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, & H1 2. Tree protection during grading shall include enclosing trees to be saved with snow fencing or other suitable material. 3. Boulevard trees will be allowed 7' from the back of the curb. 4. Shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. 5. Grading of a 10' wide trail corridor east of Hawthorne Woods Drive. 6. Pond JP 26.1 is required to provide a minimum surface area of 0.8 acres, a wet pond volume of 3.7 acre-feet, and a storage volume of 8.3 acre-feet. 7. The development is required to provide storm sewer stubs to the following areas: a) Woods Drive to connect the proposed storm sewer serving Hawthorne Woods; b) From Pond JP-26.1 across the southeasterly portion of Lot 1, Block 2, to serve future development of Outlot A, Hawthorne Woods; and c) Low area of Lot 6, Block 1. 8. The development is required to provide the required pond easement for Pond JP- 26.1. 9. Additional utility easement is required for the storm sewer lines in the following areas: a) Common lot line between Lots 3 and 4, Block 2; b) Lot 6, Block 1, for the storm sewer outletting the low area along its westerly side; and c) Rear lot areas of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, for the storm sewer to serve future development of Outlot A, Hawthorne Woods. to STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL • A. Financial obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 87. f:r. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on. the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of pending requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS #2 l `~aE;'ilts 7 1 a" -muf „,f.., \9i~F /(ypµ5f Ci`CVIrlel C,RLEI ITl V N i `accn i K OC,R ~}VTT ~ J 1 G ME i Y iv LOCATION 7)•~'" _ ~~0I5'lf 0E. ' '.751' NA 2;g'- _ MAJ~= I ` y' (1/u*~ t1AT_1.AKE iNjE_yke Sp/TN Ll1 . 4,9 1 J p 1? ( R SC • t ,.t•1C~1fli Py SS P .o ZONING `P..., , Mlr 1 s ~o . R-1 C-LE I i R-1 sn+!Pn~~It+ 2 t PK OAK P 0.11 • - NO I1 j T PF GUIDE PLAN 0-M p- • 0 D-1 PF 1l P P ON - D-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c: ~ ~ l i~ ~ \ rt~ s 1 ~ ;cam l ~••~f~ ; ~ Z IFS.. _ r,a F 7 1 2 r f I :I.ny } 1'. T k-- NE CORIER M sfcnoN ze. TRT .11 [ \r \ - STWQL 3. 40RD04 J3OT0•1fPIUgOPE RTI TION LINE N ROVE ITE 10 GATI SE I V CROW ,1)) W.I O. XR[CN 1- h^.~.-.. NCNURCN w.11• w»MR 11. ..-+.y' 4j x;.•-'i - r E _ _ ry u\ TION g{ » I \ un aNT P of ii11kk77..-7~c-yyy.1 7~`~'. ; , n I• 44 EVELA D .r4eowE IP..11.'MO[aW lF 1,/1. 'F v I ' _ 1 ~ \ ~ w II c.n u.a .oa»N[» rde.I.P - _ Alya-y+. -I { GENERAL VICINITY MAP TION 6 a.»aP1N DI OR'S SU NO 42 EG \ L.n4•LLa. ay F' 2 3L \ "`o_Ta ON~re P c uqF SF,-Rr E a b R TER I H r / j / OPO SED/ /.LAT /ROUNOARV /LINE y N w~ [ wDoD~' / y 1 h1 IOObO ' 1 f / / / / / olf .STERNS I f.l t `i,lllj.+}~I "oll•,I11. S.. all}f I ~p I N Y - -111 -~P DETAILED VICINITY MAP PRII NPRt SIN7 .,Cm F Rar Aala.irc. OWNER CONTACT TE U S 474n Ar5 V.P lFl P•-0644 I0 COMATANi OWTACT 4 MIN1wl G•N, 1hmh1/NOIs1 Mal. M 0.0 N•mIITR, .•1•.I D", TEL 4TR-6010 coN -LL, -C... F-1 . Inc DEVELOPER: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT VICINITY MAP M q J J 300 MORSE AVENUEIP.O. BOX 001 w,• u•.••r•. ,.a ..w ~ ws ww ~I su ..w• EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 35331 b HAWTHORNE WOODS NORTH >.5 S3-62 - 16121 --44 '9631 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 4 .Q Y~.° FON 6 ° I ~p =N 42 Li 1 Y l75 -7 ls•<!lV i.n gD 1 I I s` J R < L6 j I Q' 3 03SIA3~ SODOM ro 3NVOHIMVH i l 1 i< i i,$1~~J a mM a na,. r r a "y d a } I = \I 91;N t a 1 j...s O~ \ I .•C ,a.W~.s _ °t~ c 3 rl ey"fbi ir:3n~av', 32oWa W d i S g g.. a w`- ' N f~ c W = BI W r uj 5 :s - I 33a ,.~FC t 3l"J ill }llntT - < Lo 7 Q a m ! Ir"~g J is O - - ° _ ~ I ,y, a !sr { jj W P G<^ 's; B s"1 SI ..i~ tCCt[ F is MIR Jill =MSG i W ei 'J .71 13 W E fiE Is 1 :frj~ =il. ° wi A 14 ii # .~Ej !qt 181 ~E~! 8 !3 t 61 1 ~tcs°e ` i ell ii_ t la 5 16 ~ i Obo21 9 OOC <r • ~5 Q 3 - _--r{- 1 F 'o In 4-4 r'~ I I I I E~y a' i e Z°` " I 1 : j I h ~ j \ \ ? J p I : I I 1 C 3 r- enoi r I s h Zi 1w ox I ~ ~l i H ~ K ~ d 6 LLI e O F p r ^ a 10 po e 3 ~ >~W - ~ I) Ai IIQIi]MtlM _ a ? w 1 ^ „ / v LLI 3 CJ ~ • ~ ~1S3M ~1 ` I 1 I Z p ^ abow~~yi- ssa .s { Y ^I r l . r~ p~4 I / a ~r' 8ti ~~d I4 I 9 ~ i 4F , _ - I u ~ ( I I I I a s`~s" , it 1 lr 7~ W~II~~ t•~~ ~ 5i 01, ini , yr 33 ~3~ps ~ ~~rV~~/~~ `l:.`l i .t. Il~r~- ~ •~i 'rte g yri k~ 2~~'u 01 IJ ' ~ r~Z ~.•C a,.~"c li F1-5 ~4/~ e Y W M t I \ / I _ \ r ~4Y° c IYI r 1•' /mom \ \ H f . ~°'i `s - ~j y 9 3 1 r'llo :n 1 \ 1'\:i4~4i.5ti~ • iF b I r ~J°~< ~ \ p~s I.Yy'~V .-r~L .1/r y - I I :I Il~ A •/f~~ I~ \..J / ~ v \ Inigr r~~:~,,_~--J-v:.= ~tt`1 r~ /i~, ~r~• i~~• ~iv 3 J d i v im- 1 A 7 ~ I 1 \ Z?= s~ n 14 ~}I ~ /ice / a y~r y\.,-_ /'SF.S~ -~l fr•~ ~j'_Z .J '[Y SU(tt.7~e+.r~r-r/1•~Jl'~ ,r_ ~ / 1 ~ ~•~v/~~ - ~~l' r. I I ~r66~t'' ~1 ~ ? ° ~ ~ ~ ~ i i 71 1 tip, rU1 n\`~\.:~~~c _ \ \ I r I\ Cbd~ `3 t_ ( l ((__I I s a g bBs _ l `e\ \ _ Lr.~l l ho 4 AiN 4-L 4-2 -I 3.1•x, 0 _ it i^ 'u 2 c N ~ ?C~Ilk I 1 6 F F r e £ d ~~~~~~yyyyyy gy fit F=+c•G.:.,r_ \ / / PI i I OI r Y ~ 8 P~ , a $ 3 ~ ~ ~ R f E 21 Liu,`__--- _ L J ri \ s ymo E gg8 { r ~i' } Hawthorne Woods North T~ - - - - T - - FINANCIAL OBLIGATION -'1 ~11 777 LEGEND I ,i t t°,a I 11 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK ; WATER TRUNK 11 STORM SEWER TRUNK % \ AIJ.',11-OR5 SUB e•leu.sur auet•al,GD wewwarJ~'rf t'''?.^r .CON•K Crlo•• TO oustt+ ¦ LOr SURVI.1 YTY w/.>/Si ~V ~•P PHASE I PHASE 2 ~~j yfEr"~ •O •tw ~i i w jLy,,•/ rru ~ .r ~u 1 • ° R•••~• J N ~ ~ , lpi, 't rover '~f• G ~iv IN, Nw~ ns• \ »n -i:Sr > ---a ^ PHASES D 111 r •"``.rr t - n 3 l N~ r i ~ «o ••a i. r• ' ~ M Owe Q'~r--~ r; n..... '°"t gym' --.it \ , t \ / Y »....r ~ / . 3 / , \ n..w-1 ,,y~ o.` ` w«.• w.e » ^ • a.w. i L~ r ~ N~.GICMORL pRIVL - _ b ! w,,e.:/•tw•r' ~-it. w.. F£/ •ti.. ~ ~ e F _ - !'+`I I ~ ••r..N. •rr .r •aao,rr,e. I•. •r• . ~ Imnu~l ~ \ • Jam.,. W~ . . w'~ ~ ~-++a_JI ` ./G , : 1. • , ~ / D I a • ~'i...`~o o,,. r .u. ~ s^ ! ' ^ ~ I ..o .y w _,j,~. •a._. - _ - - ~ - - - OI ® Y` < nroo - • n• o.. a r» / ,e•r , r r •rr ~,oa•r : N s t~.: w'y' 1 C. J - r_~-. --gyp'-~ ! / , w / w•r r.. •sr! r_r rse lral l`[~i•,I"_ V-,\ r!y`Ua 2 V .••rorr•1 li ..«e " / /h'I ~L_ ~ ' , • M~• p ,'K N.•ro •1 / I ,wr rr • •TUr , IrNw sl - aM s ~j ~ ¢ on r y r,' ~ _ _ tout / ..r r.,T.,x.: Y.m•n tJ'r `t' u r___._t_•1\r~- ia:..'o„f n ' 1 • a. I SIC,:: '~"'o...r... _ - I I. . -..i_ ` 1` / _ e. o / ~ •,t ~ v, > .ALIT •1 • s ww ~ Ir.v. u~.e r ..•,.nr..a wn _ I (o E _ • - ° ,o6e : f G ua .o.~w.wK. = .ml» eo..+.r '°~..w. /T7ItTE;;jT • : Rv7NNu 1 P i nxc.rv o. ..-!c° m •LnK, 1...,. r. IN ,r f iJ i 1_( D • 1 / .l.. aTt v l ..n - r,G.er. R.•rr R.......•N4•uN LYMAN DEVELOPMENT R•>•ao..°. • :Kwr- / J-, ~1..~ n wD woNg AWMA ,P° w. 401 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 A ' '•T- }v~lF~, sN..r•M.! w.w_. I.CtCSIOR, MINn(SOI* 5371 HAWT ORW WOODS c Ia-q •i IMaI • e•!, RAGAN. MINNESOTA 5 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT RIVER BLUFF TOWN HOMES APPLICANT: HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC. LOCATION: OUTLOT A HILLANDALE ADDITION #3 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 15, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Heritage Development of Mn. Inc. requesting a Preliminary Plat for the River Bluff Town Homes consisting of three lots and 36 units located on Meadowlark Road east of Diffley Road. The site is currently zoned R-4 (Multiple). EXISTING CONDITIONS: The 4.10 acre site is located west of I-35E, north of the existing townhomes in Hillandale Addition #3, and east of Blackhawk Road. The surrounding land uses are as follows: unplatted R-1 (Single Family) to the north, I-35E abutting the eastern property line, and R-4 (Multiple) on all remaining sides. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units per acre). Currently, the site is undeveloped with a mix of cottonwoods, ash, and box elder trees on a gently rolling site. BACKGROUND & COMMENTS: In August 1986, Hillandale Addition #3 was approved for development of 39 townhouse units and Outlot A for future development into 38 multiple dwelling units. The proposed plat contains three lots with one building of 12 units per lot for a total of 36 units, three units less than originally proposed with the Hillandale 3rd Addition. Density for the project is 8.78 units per acre. Access to the site is from Meadowlark Road in the SW corner of the site. The existing curb cut for the driveway access is almost centered on the south property line. The proposed site plan relocates the access 10' north of the south property line which will line up with Meadowlark Road better. The two-story buildings are 72' x 204' and have a maintenance-free vinyl exterior with decorative brick. The square footage of the individual units varies from 1,100 sq. ft. to 1,600 sq. ft. All units have main floor bathrooms and the end units have main floor bedrooms. Each building contains 12 individual entry units, four with single car garages. Of the 36 units, 12 are two-bedroom, six can be modified to two or three bedrooms based on preference, and the remaining 18 units are three-bedroom units. One and two car attached 81. garages are provided depending on unit size. The townhomes are all owner/occupied. All buildings meet, or exceed, setback and parking requirements. The landscape plan shows a good mix of overstory and understory trees and should blend in nicely with the adjacent properties. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication at their June 7 meeting. qo. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing terrain on this site is rolling with trees scattered throughout the area. This type of development requires flat pads for the proposed buildings and parking lots. The preliminary grading plan shows cuts ranging up to 8' and fills up to 6'. The majority of the site will be disturbed by the proposed grading. The preliminary grading plan shows a pair of 2 to 4 foot high retaining walls along the north property line of the site. Detailed plans shall be submitted with the final grading plan that shows the design parameters for the construction of the retaining walls. This proposed development is located within Drainage District A-21 as illustrated on Figure #18. Drainage from this area is directed by storm sewer to the northwest to Pond AP-2 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan as shown on Figure # 17. The preliminary drainage plan shows constructing a storm sewer line from this site to the west across the adjacent Hillandale Addition No. 1 to an existing 21" storm sewer line with a capacity of 22 cfs. 18.5 acre drainage area that currently flows to the existing 21" line from the townhouse development along Meadowlark Road will produce a flow of approximately 40 cfs during a 5 year storm and a flow during a 10 year storm of approximately 47 cfs. The 21" system drains a low point on Meadowlark Road in Hillandale Addition No 1 so a 10 year design storm shall be used to size the storm sewer. Since the 21" line is currently overburdened, the proposed development will not be allowed to convey its storm water runoff without limiting the flow from the site to 1 cfs. This development will be responsible for providing a pond on site or acquiring an easement and constructing a pond on adjacent property to limit the flow from the site to 1 cfs. The preliminary drainage plan shows discharging storm water runoff from the parking lot in the northeast corner of the site to an area with a steep slope that would drain overland northeasterly onto private property to the north of this site. The development will be required to revise the drainage plan to convey the drainage from the northeast corner of the site to the internal storm sewer system. In addition, storm sewer needs to be added in the southeast corner of the site to drain a land-locked low area. The land-locked low area will receive approximately 1.2 acres of runoff from the existing townhouses to the south. The proposed drainage plan shall extend storm sewer to drain this lower area and convey that water to the public storm sewer facilities. On the east property line of the site, MnDOT has constructed a 6' - 10' high berm with a fence along the top of the berm on the MnDOT right-of-way. The berm provides a good screen from I-35E. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's/Erosion Sediment Control Manual Standards. WATER QUALITY: This proposed multi-family residential development is located in drainage basin A. Runoff from the site will first reach Pond AP-2, a designated stormwater basin on the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond AP-2 discharges to Pond AP-1 which is classified as a Class III scenic recreation pond and is the nearest downstream recreational water body. In order to meet the water quality treatment standards for the 4.1 acre site, a pond dedication would be required. The design of the pond shall provide a surface area of 0.17 acres at the NWL and a wet pond volume of 0.4 acre-feet. This recommendation is subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: The preliminary utility plan shows constructing a sanitary sewer line across the adjacent Hillandale Addition No. 1 property to connect to an existing 9" sanitary sewer located approximately 300 feet west of this site. The existing 9" sanitary sewer has sufficient depth and capacity to serve this development. The preliminary utility plan has a layout that will provide a single sanitary sewer service to each building and an 8" main line that will serve the three buildings and extend to the west to the existing 9" line. Watermain of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this site from the intersection of South Meadowlark Road and Meadowlark Road. The preliminary utility plan shows extending the 8" watermain through the site and providing 6" watermain service stubs to each building. The preliminary utility plan is also showing 4 hydrants located throughout the site that will provide adequate fire protection. STREETS ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is available from the intersection of South Meadowlark Road and Meadowlark Road. The preliminary site plan shows constructing private driveways through the site to serve the proposed townhouses. The private street and driveway system shall be constructed with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing and the widths shall meet the City Code requirements for private streets based on the number of units that the street will serve. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall be required to obtain all easements necessary for construction of the storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines that will be extended off this site. The development shall dedicate adequate drainage and utility easements over the proposed utilities on this site. This development will be responsible for dedicating ponding easements over the proposed pond up to the HWL of the pond. The developer should apply to MnDOT to vacate the excess right-of-way along the east property line of this site. It appears that there is approximately 40-60 feet of excess right-of- way that could possibly be vacated over to the MnDOT fence that is located along the top of the berm. Staff recommends that the developer pursue obtaining this excess right-of-way from MnDOT before the final plat is approved so the additional right-of-way can be incorporated into the final plat. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits, MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT, etc. are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - RIVER BLUFF TCWIN HOMES Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None p y3• CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RIVER BLUFF TOWN HOMES: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B4, C1, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, & H1 2. All landscaped yards shall be irrigated. 3. A copy of the Homeowners Association and Townhome Bylaws shall be submitted for review by the City attorney. 4. All trash/recycling containers shall be stored within individual garages until the day of common pick up. 5. Buildings colors shall be complementary neutral colors. 6. White pines located along I-35E shall be changed to be Austrian Pines with the Final Plat landscaping plan. 7. A cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication will be required. 8. Detailed plans and specifications shall be prepared for the proposed retaining wall and submitted with the final grading plan. 9. This development will be responsible for providing a storm water detention pond to limit the flow from this site to 1 cfs. 10. Storm sewer shall be extended to the southeast corner of the site to pick up the landlocked low area and convey the drainage from this low area to the internal storm sewer system. 11. The proposed drainage plan shall provide storm sewer that will convey runoff from the parking lot to the public storm sewer facilities without allowing for overland drainage from the parking lot areas. 12. In order to meet water quality requirements, a pond with a surface area of 0.17 acres at the NWL and a wet pond volume of 0.4 acre feet shall be provided. 13. This development will be responsible for extending sanitary sewer and storm sewer through the adjacent property to connect to the existing City facilities and obtaining public drainage and utility easements over the proposed lines. 44. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance tth current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STAI:DARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. water quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. H. Otber 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS #2 ~G• River Bluff Addition 11A A&M .1L AV -N 4: wml;. IgAll < TA AI ° ~ VI NO A. cop ~nvE Nt~nRT / . AVF INNA t 4' Off yARRRO 41 Yi / ,Ar,(N 1 a 1R41L 1R- 0 ^.I rLLLLLLI,----JJJ-jr TACONITE _ ' I T IlF STUB LOCATION ' ARNfL/ ))rr P4FA 1 A n 7 ~i ~ t ~ f NKAI1 4. SON 4/FR ~ ~TIIRY N LARK RI, Ar) LARK// I I M PT w1h RA N. X -`IIIlf<.. ,,lr, R(•Ab TERM F 4r ~3 iR l'R a SF y~NW , E NW i 7-10 1 ,t,•l PK vAl AL!iYI !`~Ill ~ i 77~~ ' t Ifl{ ,u At n1 r ZONING R 4. 1r A -R8 MGR -~~r? it's. ~~;k / ; , PU II PK ui~,Q ;~+1 PK •kL~"A1J!' 4:141 1 +r a •iu'gr 1.1 ,A A D- 1 GUIDE PLAN D- D-IN f D•II % 11 PF P 7411 C~l i-~-°7 \ \ 'fib 'jl a u c o Z 4 / z °o O z L CC, 11 ! i / j 1 i / ,r\`` ~•-P, OZZVI ~°o O f} ,,,o J v~Y III ~ m j I 1 I 11 I i f ~ ~ \ / t / I/ I \ yl 1 I I I /I / / U / I II )r' 1 ~ ,t.,, ~j I I 1 I` / f J n 1 1 1 ti. I{~ 9 I r~ I I y I I__r_I rraa~sM..w I.) I/ ~I~ I N C ~w LL Q 1 I d i~ I\ ` L i ! G G_11 r II r ~ = ~ OrOU m J ~g +arwo0r3n ru nos R 0, n s r ~i I s M i I L.L 1 $ I w z LLJ CL V- i .r k w N a- ~adue W Q x LJ Z Z ~ W_V WIt _ ze U Q U W U: cn~QZ ?~Z a z w ¦ a n OZF JZZ~ O +\I Z !C.9 il 3 S tu~~ Q~ N (LWr-moo I? ~j zZo wNZZ P. Z?a m . `y~V'' \ S hs ZQ„> p1LXILQ d) F 3 IL ~w O ZC VX V J :3WWz JWW< `'sF'tSang Fyt~1E 13 Of < D @± o ~~o zO~Y o 3 x o Q z -<L wAmUuo U(3 mUL) o a, u cn lit - o&( r ' Q 13 O p^ r iijryW 13 x ® CT I al I ial J 0l U 1u i b l a L. - „ aar l TO L_ ~ O v I,j *,L®~ cis Q cr- TM. o ~vf sJ .ra _..r _P.r .rc Y.r ~ ,.a ~ O, O ~ I J _ ,P,oi _ P'At o n J I 11 Lr) Ul O Cn z ~ z a o 4ty~ Y 5 z `t y `fib jb~ a > Z ~ z V.3ap O c. B,Zts -f y. r.Y> ' "C~ K V1 Z 'y U ` O Ln =ix. a ~a O a ~,i a:rr m <W boo o u ~ b \ m t ?Iw ~(1 ^ 8 k ~ a oiv < z W E _3 c t , - y a \ \ ~ 0~\ O Q_. tia FEW a y ° 1 .'7 Y -1 0 < .?7 - 1 N I J G Q z z0r 3.S~\f z D [ a43NO2 AL OH r ougdV 31vahl IN I < 9 8 G _j z n\ im,y . +rvlMO0v3n ~f105 A Z cr- w w j C 1 I I ~J ,L.rL~ W un!~N 3AV if •i~ •I• Y gPI P _ v= SEC J lyVA u Z Sdg= a- L/i = N aid 5 sip } :~ic8i o z m f Sil I2, IA LLI W Q of w J z z - a FZ- W t W It a W W O ( a) LO LU d) W F c N b b LL ~Z Z }LI) W>tll d~ W m ~;y ~Z~E ~~QZ 3?QZ W LLJ o d o S 7I~ z ! to "Qo Z Y QZE DZZE . -J 2 Z o LL@ a a "I lu¢ i a~r m @ T 3 a = e 6 3' _ qq I " W a p fie ? lU --Z' 6i 11 d ~W° > j.: w O o W ls I a d O k LL W r~~ Z af W v o W$ i o alo'er a a Z r a o Z3 ~IZZv m m r r ~ ~ WWOQ> Op(3 d) F- Xn Z ti :!tla a trl5 ae aF s e~"e 4ZUU~ WWz wJWWcr d w J,n -Im Z~Us Q~©U p- LO -i'1°le aiF a a t s r J ~F~~Y ~1 -1 o r J r _ 0 S i{I ~ OI U U V V QI O oo o n. o o In ba • EROSION CONTROL NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES ZONED R-3 / ] 1001 Cwrnux nn•vy N 89 51 18' E / 1 Mw• ro Nauw Gwwa. wsr,u a] s1o. rtxa ] p.~sr»N, colrw.s •uo-- 485 65- / w 1oc.uws s..,., ADanwy a1 srG rt.c]s f .Drava cwrw.s s.aw.-N _ _ _ - " / w1 r x1q.•]o rca ]ay cwulwls aauw • MroovD sro1 ]u rAnMS baq, " I NPrw GN]wG MIMI MDRID w •M M]A aY M]A • M100MM i110 r10 tt YnS (LWWj 1. I A7A ~.M.s., \ \ _ / •AVS 1o +rr:c u+coNlurto G]AS • M Dvu ancNw a G.•.•u / ® ~ ~ E / a Navo w•1Nx D•rw I JI' - i Af l.w •KA WISIC! M fM[r ~S 01Ap]D. MONp / x•nU? N?2110]D. yrD wlwyK.01LLDMM• Y'-- - f1Nyw1 5[l M1Y Af ]]N'u Af M.CDCK KRa GAUwO ~ i/ ~ / \ \ ~ , / .ca.NAAR/---~--7 • y+D 1N1M E WI a.10 U- \ / nNODA'ri ar n aq uN1N AMU- R cs]A•uvND CONSIRUC110R OF A SILT nF/IR ve- - of 46 'd -1 11\ 1. 1 vmk .rr..i.'I .w r.... SIE ? I` ® O ~ ; ( O \ Q / I j ~ •f I I lII/ ~ f ~ / I k II \ HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT - OF MINNESOTA, INC. MEADOWLARK ROAD 450 E. COUNTY RD. D LITTLE CANADA, MN. 5511'1 1iD: 37• ' CON. KEVIN VON RIEDEL _i_ • E. G. RUD t SONS INC. vej, LAND SURVEYORS 154 27 9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.E. t w..... . 5 89 30' 3T W ZONED R_3 CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55014 I _ _ _r__ NRUnouE ADDnIaN NO 3 CON. RON ALWIN o BENCH MARK: °.o I I , 3.o'O \ ~ C TOP NUT OF HYDRANT 200 SOUTH Of CHARLES W. PLOWS 1 1 2 3 I I -13''~ THE INTERSECTION Of MEADOWLARK ROAD 4 CONSULTING ENGINEER r• aN inxi.woi, w~a mn1. 3 I I I 7 , ay y AND SOUTH MEADOWLARK ROAD I ELEV - 92500 FEET (NG.VD VERTICAL DAT.) 9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.E. nalRtl0031C N.G.WaI• M 18LO~K 9; I 8 2 I 1 1 / LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CIRCLE PINES MN. 55014 Zymi.L L- 1 I< J OUT OF A, Hilt ANDAIF ADni0ON NO 3 CON CHARLES PLOWS D.R.se c_wc 12245 r 10 - DAKOTA COUNTY. MINNESOI- / OWNER & DEVELOPER: HERITAGE DEVELOPMEN I RIVER BLUFF TOWN HOMES PREPARED BY: F G. RUD & SONS, INC. PRELIMINARY T-- CONSULTING ENGINEER: CHARLES W. PLOWS GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION nom- DATE: 5/7/92 CONTROL PLAN LAN 0 15,50 Cu i?L, SHEET 2 01 4 1 /AGr1N, MINNI S01A NORTH rAl f" 1,, OA C ` ~ - 1 2 O lp.~ ' z > Z *..r r b 4. o`oo o (~v r~a _ .fl ar a {b ti~rv °a -bb -b V z _ k ~OaO F<r O `mod 'II S'= O a- ' zonx N o u'~ d. 3~W~'I ~av =ZZO II Jya WOSZ WAG M, ~00 °'yt / / CC Z Yqy / Cf) 00 - : c J 0 z J / 'wl: < v Z r ~ cr- / a< W / O W r/ I --C3-11 LU / I I 8 ' m I L - -81692 i- -a,a I ,z. ou r------ M: z c D - < - ~w' l\'V S 1~ 'n ~m~J i arm om3n6 51 uroS R I b l - s Y w if..TV 'I i 1 s t?l 11l z '3xs'ttybY O Z 0 , '~~~333/// O s~ e$4 yin=S J 0 I pppp < e w u a- -sigh _ < 7 (SUL ~ W W V _ of 'a Ql~ Z W d W> Z LA w yy W Z LLA W QZ~NZ-, 3 ZZa Lou m O\LQ N a4xcnvwAr.r.- R °8 WWUQ> ~X~a ~FXO ' D Z O Z U U Z 0 W U1 W w 1= ?WLU JJO ly~ 1Jv W Q J'~ U Z U N w w 7~~ Q B~ z z w Well~a-a-0 w W O J~ = V WJ61Uv 6 U m 0 3 O U O u 86 I , - nr.~r-, r ' . / pi.a/aa u r kc1$Q Aul b8; 6f 1`1 8 , IE - 0 I, _ 16' 1-~ ~ 0 1 -~1 t{il L;) ~l• IFZ i ; i' r t. y• ~0 !lo4Q Q723/bd0 50,0/9b0,! ri 1 7 GL Q' ;PRE i u I r,l 1 .i G/ Fj 132 79.3/x1 Q 8 1. 950 nc ~1 r - 6LACr(HA~.n 1J A PARK 'i t. /lll~ E 29 7 4/07.Q rr'r 1 N \ tt t Yi, r I i . tt PARK j: 7 \iY \'.Z :~1 r X71- 128 T / i ~'!yt'y r 'i+c,`'{ ~ 't `r' 1~ J'~ ~ l•~ "t*~ ~ ;i11~18'it..~ t8 L /r, r z iqq`,: 59%65_0 18a 9 i~01 t~ t 127 26 11 r::i;~ 1 123 ~.-,6t~'/6001 f t rW t: ~.!r } r W3.9/'\ 6 M•G- -'GROUND, Lj LJ1 75.0 12 / ~ = 121 99%690 [ :t - 8" STORAGE n FFWLrC~. a 5~ I 126 H_V~. L .f 0 n_ t _Iu: I i.. - r ti~ J LAN L E 24.6/ 125 bw4cj, 79.:ii~- 162• 55. '44.0 r Lt ~tj rHF'r1Y. 16°IOOr 72.7( 16 60.7/07 16~ 5I.3/ 18150 18~ 12° 107.0 164 165 2•• t55 1 1+ - O62 o' 163 170 52.6/ 44-k/ 7t.0 70.2/92.0 ) b 1U,pL. 5U ` L. .:.J~~.! ,;,;•~~j? - - 1611 166 T 76.f3/5Ei0 yw t u.l i J G^ tZ r 8 16i _sl r .,l 4' - > I 158 :167:) Yr4 0 02 =/v r 71. u52.o s; I 151 4 1 J^ 74 j IV, J1. 153 B" Z70 Tr.r 7 :.MEri ~Ift. lr 169.Zf3tl 12 rt. . 12 156 12M 157 T4rr~/ 94.0 . OL:~f f 'J r I 169 75:6/ 95.0 fit ~ .I WATERMAIN LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN 10- A_7 V f- / GK L ~ n"lei ~ ;E It K 7 & B-( Ti ~1 1 _ A-14 ~kiR~t~13 < ~t~'~ rt 1 BLACKHA*K ah /1 s 1liGt{j A .t~iL PARKS-L} F'Attr: ~ 1LTLl[ 1 i 19 A~ A7 77, JA 22 34 r. I i- : rau MI -LANDALI" I -i LiAN C A- 24 B-6 I W A 2 _35 77 LIB, 1 3 /Tl i A-26 2 8-36' 'a% Y; ~I l y f ^ 7t~ B 1.2 5 - t T HO T 'q B' _„J 1 A'~L AaBl r rtT I r1 }T`~ I Pflwt R U' Il f Y A', ntl 5.. B-13 -28 B _~1 rT il' T .pi n,, Val. FIGURE NO. 18 STORM SEWER DRAINAGE DISTRICTS CITY OF EAGAN 10'x• A-h irr vv V f- t n o Lt, 839.48 84/. x1L~`i -r .~rl l~ .I1• .j1 r`. Bp- 4 /V 'T rwE' u;,y~ to ;.821 0' L I. IN. ~ ':~~Era t c AP5 viyw Y t~ ,;r, f• All 111- L &O, JP 5 N. -36 - FT _823.8 .y „~c•u~~ t 112} ,e y P _ r Sys li 834.0 8?VE 1 4. 1 8~/.3 BLACKHI 27 se P•37-.., vk l _1..r PAt2ri8 - } ~~i r'~r~.,~di[ -803.5 , . i~ , ( ~ - . p-2 - , l r ? `~MJ \5 41 BP=291 q 6c qU`1„v BP-29.1 809.7 I Li 9160 80q. A ! 2X 920.0 AR 858.6 8 6 1 (;.cam ` 2 68 868.0 4~'~ .~y-~ Anil', T2 ){1~c316.1.4~ E } 1771'1 S~ '886 q~ rr 48" A=u' 895"2.-~ li l -A•h1:.L r_~~o A=~ pAn !j I j JP-37,:x$. IL 7 BP-3 .872.0 LL 1t 889.9 2:.~7b~Clr , , " 15" p-35 905.2 cf , {r+,_r.AhuALF 908.0 72 ' A ff -p •r- '11 920.2 iJ L11 N } AP-4 BP-4 Ti,: 886.3 BP-25 J 87-.2 890.6 i • F AP-7_ I l / / a~ B-s 924.0 886.5 BP-2 A-'" i::-.~•s920.5 I' ~ tp1, ~ 9272 u 862 v AP-35 ,'9. P"a7•~ a B 6.0: 680.6 2a:5 •I BP 5.1 t A 16860 B42 c s h .900.0 T -k-- rBP j24 CE rl .-'-.AP-51 v 874.5 892.3 920.0- , trc. 93 r •AP-7 / i .O lo.i 889.4 15 899.OAP,,28 _ I r 8..d le' 1 X93.9 tJ,ti 90 8871 { ;:ii.' I9 I l 0:.r:` ! r3., 892.0 A ~ r h ~e f ? TS "931.3 1 r 10 30- P• . P-9 932.3 86. ?.g L=o 7-1 24 ru AP- 12 9E 933) BP-6_~ ,rt:l~i Rio BP61 AP 24 AP 22 AP-43 9040 882.0. 89$.9 872.0 873.G 896.0 BP 10 - i 9/O. 90/.l` 87f~.? 880.0 900.0 ' u Y6'r r r5 12' 18' v 9,160 12 z kr 8-e BP-15 4 t(r s~ :e A ~g 1' BP18.2 9B0/.9. BP-I 8P 20`rL~ i '~yti ~90e `t3 9130 899. A cc - •y t 96 0~ 90/. r20.~t1 W 3 t t P, 13' 45. R FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN s • SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT YMCA 1ST ADDITION APPLICANT: OPUS CORP. LOCATION: PART OF E 1/2 OF SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: I-I (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 1S, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Opus Corporation for West Publishing Company requesting a Preliminary Plat of one lot and three outlots on approximately 36 I-I (Light Industrial) acres located in the SE corner of Highway 149 and Opperman Drive. BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the YMCA has been looking for a development site in the Eagan area. West Publishing Company acquired the remaining undeveloped land south of United Parcel Service and Opperman Drive and plans to donate the land in the NE corner of the property to the YMCA. The City has determined that the use of a YMCA is permitted within a Limited Industrial zoning district. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed plat is located south of the United Parcel Service and Opperman Drive, west of Inver Grove Heights and County Road 63 (Delaware Trail), north and east of West Publishing Company and T.H. 149. The land uses surrounding this plat are industrial to the north, residential to the east in Inver Grove Heights, and there is one single family residential dwelling unit abutting the site to the east in Eagan and office/warehouse and manufacturing to the south and west. The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates the project area as industrial. The entire site is vacant with open gently rolling hills. There are a couple of low wet areas where stands of trees are located. There are more trees located in the SW portion of the plat to the east of the already existing industrial uses. COMMENTS: The YMCA is proposing a two-phase development. Phase I includes a 30,000 sq. ft. building which will house administrative offices, meeting rooms, child care, an indoor pool, gymnasium, and locker rooms. Tennis courts and youth sports fields are also included in the first phase of development. Phase II is a 15,000 sq. ft. building addition for racquetball courts, kids gymnasiums, and additional meeting rooms. There are no current plans for Outlots A and B. Outlot C along T.H. 149 will be dedicated as right-of-way with the Final Plat submission. 167 SITE PLAN: The proposed site plan includes one lot and three outlots. Lot 1, Block 1, YMCA Addition (880,024 sq. ft. or 20.2 acres) is located in the NE and central portion of the plat. Outlot A (512,831 sq. ft. or 11.8 acres) is located in the NW portion of the plat and Outlot B (332,684 sq. ft. or 7.6 acres) is located in the southerly portion. Outlot C (63,789 sq. ft. or 1.4 acres) runs along Trunk Highway 149 on the west and will be dedicated as right-of-way with this plat. The 30,000 sq. ft. single story building is situated in the NW corner of Lot 1, Block 1. The building exterior is to be constructed of face brick and glass. As proposed, all buildings and parking setbacks meet Code requirements. The only access to the YMCA is from Opperman Drive. No access will be taken from County Road 63 (Delaware Trail). The plan shows 201 parking spaces which will be 10' wide except the four handicap stalls which will be 12' x 20'. The conceptual Landscape Plan demonstrates a good mixture of plant material and only minor modifications to the final plan will be necessary. Additional screening material will be required along the eastern property line between the existing single family homes and the parking lot. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication at their June 7 meeting. 1 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan proposes to grade for the YMCA site (Lot 1, Block 1) plus grading for Outlots A and B of this development. The grading for the YMCA building and parking lot areas will require fill of 14 feet and cuts ranging up to 3 feet. The grading for the ballfields for the YMCA will require cuts of 6 feet and fills as high as 4 feet. The grading for Outlot A and B will require a substantial amount of fill over a majority of the two sites. The filling for the two Outlots will range from 4 feet to 15 feet. The construction of Pond GP-7 will require 20 feet of cut at the bottom of the pond. As shown on the attached Figure #17, Storm Sewer Layout Map, drainage from this site is directed in a northerly direction to Ponds GP-9 and GP-5. These two ponds were constructed with the UPS 1st Addition development. Pond GP-5 does not have an outlet at this time. The preliminary grading plan proposes to construct Pond GP-7 to handle the runoff from the proposed YMCA development plus the future development of Outlots A and B. Pond GP-7 will also be required to handle the runoff from the existing developments of Yorkton South and Yorkton South 2nd Addition plus the exception between the two Yorkton developments. The 2.2 acre wetland on the southeastern corner of Lot 1 which is designated as Pond GP- 13 will receive runoff from the trailer court development to the east of Delaware Trail in Inver Grove Heights. The final drainage plan will be required to extend storm sewer from the normal water level of Pond GP-13 to the existing 24" culvert under Delaware Trail. Pond GP-13 shall have a storm sewer outlet that will discharge into Pond GP-7. The final grading and drainage plan covering Outlot B shall accommodate the flow out of Pond GP-4 which is on the southeast corner of the West Publishing property and the flow from 8.6 acres in Inver Grove Heights that drains through a culvert under Delaware Trail. The outlet flow rate for Pond GP-4 is 31.4 cfs through a 21" storm sewer line that crosses Highway 149 and outlets into Outlot B. Based on a preliminary analysis, the following requirements shall be met for Pond GP-13 and Pond GP-7 based on a 100-year design storm: Direct Tributary Pond Area Pond Storage Pond Pond NWL HWL Area @ NWL Volume Outflow Pond GP-7 862.6 868 57 acres 2.1 acres 12 acre-feet 40 cfs Pond GP-13 863 868 22 acres 0.9 acres 5 acre-feet 2.2 cfs The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards WATER QUALITY: Runoff from this proposed development will eventually reach Burr Oak Pond (GP-1), a 10-acre lake in Burr Oak Park designated as a Class II indirect contact recreation water body in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Analysis indicates that without on-site ponding to treat runoff from this site when it becomes fully developed, degradation of water quality in Burr Oak Pond would occur. Current City policy is to prohibit further degradation in the water quality of recreational classified lakes as a result of new development. Therefore, on-site ponding will be required to meet water quality standards. The minimum pond size for Pond GP-7 required to meet water quality treatment requirements for the entire site under the proposed land uses is 0.92 acres in surface area at the NWL, 4.6 acre-feet in wet pond volume, and 5 feet in mean depth below the normal water level. This size assumes that all inlets are separated from the outlet of the pond by at least 350 feet. Shorter separation distances will require a somewhat larger pond. The City will review the design of the proposed pond for conformance with NURP standards, including adequate separation between the inlets and the outlet. In February, 1992, the applicant compiled a site inventory of wetlands from soil surveys, topographic maps, and aerial photos. The survey showed 3 wetlands on site, although there were two other areas on-site that may be wetlands. The applicant will avoid impacting a 0.8 acre Type 7 forested wetland and a 2.2 acre Type 3 emergent wet meadow, but proposes to fill a 0.5 acre Type 6 wetland in the southwest part of the site. Approval of a replacement plan will depend on submission of a completed wetland inventory with field verification, an explanation of why filling of wetlands is unavoidable, and a proposal from the developer for replacement of filled or drained wetlands on an acre-for-acre basis as required by the Wetlands Conservation Act. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service for Lot 1 is readily available from an existing 12" sanitary sewer line that runs through Lot 1. The proposed YMCA building is shown to connect to the 12" sanitary sewer line. The grading of the development will add fill of up to 14 feet over the existing 12" RCP sanitary sewer. This development will be responsible for any damage done to the existing sanitary sewer line that might be disturbed during the grading operations. The exception (Parcel 010-75) that is located between Yorkton South and Yorkton South 2nd Addition currently does not have sanitary sewer service provided to it. Therefore, sanitary sewer shall be extended from the existing 12" sanitary sewer in Lot 1 to the property line of the exception with this development. Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available to the YMCA development from an 8" water main in Opperman Drive. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the existing 8" water main with an 8" water main and a hydrant for fire protection that will serve the proposed building. Outlots A and B have water main stubs already provided to them from the existing 16" water main along the east side of TH 149, or from the 8" water main in Opperman Drive and Delaware Trail. I'd As shown on the Eagan Water Distribution System Map, the City's comprehensive plan shows that a lateral water main needs to be extended on Delaware Trail from Opperman Drive to the south for approximately 1,500 feet to connect to the existing 8" water main in Delaware Trail. This extension of lateral water main will provide looping from the water main in Opperman Drive through the east side of the YMCA site. STREETS: Street access for the proposed development will be provided from Opperman Drive to the north. The preliminary site plan does not show any access to Delaware Trail which is a County road. The preliminary site plan proposes a common access point for the westerly access to the YMCA which will also be shared with the future development of Outlot A. Opperman Drive was recently upgraded by the City in 1991 and a traffic signal system was provided at the intersection with TH 149. The east access to the YMCA shall match the centerline of the existing driveway to the north that serves the UPS development. City Code requires the upgrading of adjacent roadways as new development occurs along the roadway. Delaware Trail is a 2-lane rural section roadway with access for the trailer court development along the east side in Inver Grove Heights. Delaware Trail is a County road that does not receive much traffic at this time. Based on the low traffic on Delaware Trail, the City does not feel that Delaware Trail needs to be upgraded with this development. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS f PERMITS: This development shall dedicate all right-of- way and easements necessary for the future upgrading of Delaware Trail. This development will be responsible for dedicating ponding easements over Pond GP-13 and Pond GP-7 up to the high water level of the ponds. Also, drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated for all sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water lines that are constructed within this development. The City will require wider easements over the existing utilities to provide for easements that are twice as wide as they are deep with respect to the final grading plan. This development shall dedicate a conservation easement over the 0.8 acre Type 7 forested wetland that is located 400 feet south of the proposed YMCA building. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, MnDept. of Health, Dakota County, MnDOT, Corps of Engineers, MnDNR, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - YMCA 1ST ADDITION Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer C/I 17.25/F.F. 1,553 F.F. $26,789 This property has levied assessments totaling $138,680. These levied assessments will be pro-rated on an area basis to the succeeding outlots and lots created by the plat. There is a pending assessment of $74,795 for Project 600 on one of the parcels. This pending assessment will be also pro-rated on an area basis to the succeeding lots and outlots created by the plat. It 70 CONDITIONS FOR YMCA 1ST ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, & H1 2. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened. 3. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated. Additional plant material will be required between the eastern property line and the parking lot. 4. All trash/recycling enclosures or areas shall be large enough to accommodate the dumpsters. 5. All parking stalls shall be 10'. 6. 24' drive lanes are required. 7. Four handicap stalls shall be 12' x 20'. 8. Ingress/egress easement shall be dedicated when Outlot A is developed. 9. Outlot C shall be dedicated as public right-of-way with the Final Plat. 10. The final drainage plan will be required to extend- storm sewer from the NWL of Pond GP-13 to the existing 24" culvert under Delaware Trail that drains the trailer court. 11. Pond GP-13 shall provide 5-acre feet of pond storage volume and the storm sewer outlet pipe shall discharge into Pond GP-7. 12. The final grading and drainage plan covering Outlot B shall accommodate the flow out of Pond GP-4 and the flow from 8.6 acres in Inver Grove Heights. 13. Pond GP-7 shall provide 12-acre feet of pond storage volume and the storm sewer outlet shall be designed to handle 40 cfs. 14. To meet water quality requirements for Lot 1, Block 1, Outlot A and Outlot B, Pond GP-7 shall provide a minimum of 0.92 acres in surface area at the NWL, 4.6 acre-feet in wet pond volume and 5 feet in mean depth below the NWL. 15. This development will avoid impacting the 0.8 acre Type 7 forested wetland by providing a conservation easement over the wetland. 113. 16. A replacement plan for the filled or drained wetlands on this site shall be prepared that will provide for an acre-for-acre replacement as required by the Wetlands Conservation Act. 17. This development will be responsible for any damage done to the existing sanitary sewer lines that run through Lot 1 and Outlots A and B as a result of the grading operations. 18. Sanitary sewer service shall be extended through Lot 1 from the existing 12" sanitary sewer to Parcel 010-75 that is located west of proposed Pond GP-7. 19. A lateral water main in Delaware Trail shall be extended from Opperman Drive to the south for 1500 feet as shown on the Eagan Water Distribution System Map. 20. The east access to the YMCA from Opperman Drive shall match the centerline of the existing driveway to the north that serves the UPS development. 21. This development shall dedicate all right-of-way and easements necessary for the future upgrading of Delaware Trail. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, pending, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Ouality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Otber 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS #2 NN m NE LOCATION SE L o :re 'NE_.3 ~KNrrior ZONING ji - GUIDE PLAN - t - _ COUNTY - ROAD NO 63A e 5 L Xj E' IOPPERMAN ROAD) PRI:I,IMINARI• PLAT' O YMCA is,r ADDITION ~ ~ - it • ~ A... I 0 - e I Ned..00 c rer 20 t I \ I - YJ~ • \ I- I \)T i~ ...\t' I•::I~~W •-•_.-na.. Pa•e .t.mn lit 4/0 2 c\ _ 1 \ I - LOT ° ~eo.oz~ s~ Ft, y • t _ \ t' 20.203 A< e A- i lL•. 1 .r \ i L 9~ T n° air ~ - ~C~,t'~''t-~..,~ y-T ~ =.-»,-aF~p•,\~ ~ ~ I -'s•'°° ~ q ~ " r ~ `ter. ~ ~ ~ - TJ.- \ '\\-et I`~~ rlm0 • 4%` T• , Sheet 2 01 2 SheeH Z Y - 9~•1 _ _ - _ _ LE = c - -it L If 38Wv-1ao t . L)i OVID S J J~ti ~ Dro 1 i~ , EELL LE L_'LE!!E SL LLL£L ELL? ' CMERMAN DRIVE Gam- . A, aR r. I u ~~~J I sNR. c C y I I~ \ { 1 I \ Y , O 1 n 1 i $ n I \ ` % O C r 0 w - 1 i NORTH aV . SCALE 1• : 60.0' • V M C A 1st ADDITION eww. e~.~.~resey e~ EAOAN. MINNESOTA Via, .mow , Q~s MCNerI.cwli L EWNm I.. I1 SITE PLAN A'l Fn< 8[ 7b[ lit p.Mni H - ` vIFTIMO ~ ' ~ NORTH SCALE 600' cc + V M C A 1st ADDITION J' ~,1' EAOAH. MINNESOTA OPUS ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS. INC. • LA OpAPEPLAi • _ _ r•-COShf ROAD NO 63A ~:w•fpppEpMAy_. ROAD. - 00 V~A % t ff fFl T_ 14, ..c.h Q 'POO j L W cy49<. Aq~` yo 7770 '•;f --~Y.MC.A FRST ADDITION wr_ ••a....+o o., mr.. ~ uavwi ^ OPUS ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. . -LAN 9001~ -one L J-- 7-7 y Y11I~. 0 rL T 30 A- ~ 1 I \ ,`T J 1 » ti r EU! Ijcf :E : I g E °s c t ~ i FINANCIAL OBLIGATION LEGEND M IIIIIIILATERAL BENEFIT SANITARY SEWER o .v MOMTM I a I ' SCALE 1• : 60.0' . Iz3' C A 1$ ADDITION Al E.O.M. YIMME tOT• ++i.. + , OPUS AACWTKn i 861NE M. W- SITE PLAN 880.4 8, E-6 ~fz TJ. i i ~Ifr j E-c 7.2 { N`I Ems;' INDUS ---GP 5 r.n 1 E-e az" Ed f.~n. 84 0 E-j 27 E-i a8,l 36 - - Ist GP-9 91 EP=23 L 876.0 856.0 682.01 M JP-33.1 IlJP-16.t-, lhFrr ADD7 ON I2' 867.0 879.5 875.5 riAG. -1 LJP-I4 - ---$85.5-I EP-2.1 83.0 T'P 864.3 850.01 JP-16 JP.17 870.0 ° P 3 g79.4~ 858.0 s a a 2ay-'~ JP 59 Jp•gl,, 850.00 Y0R11T~'-C 6640- ~,4 LP IN! i1 - - - BB70 876.0 L5- 12-'~ Q J 1~ K 1 \ --11 42 GJ WESCOTT 8.00 N JP-60 STAT!c ..1.~' s &P-13 88A 0 JP,-`l2 Fl,,r`~ I JP-18 ' 860.0 JP -'4 1,'. 88840 8340~;. 869.0 T ;JF 86Yr1.t3 a JP-31 JP-39 JP-31. 2 t T 24 GP-4 ti` n 880.0 876.3 884.0 895.0 883. 884.0 12-.880 .4- , , 1j;8674 PO T7 30.2 -m JP-I9 30 -80, 1~ JP T1 IS . 887.5 JP-58 874.0 8980 0-791 889./ 877.5 ~2 883.0 902. 8940 JP-58 882.8 r,r:898 0 894:0 x,884 ; ~ JP30 JP-20 ~T 1~,~ ~,t ? i . i JP-6 873.0 852.0 27' 'v i j` - 856.0 882.0 JP- 20.1 ,6955.•6 864.4 e84.0 , 879.3 JP-54 888.3"ti J- __9868= )&722,' t..S.17 r ~C 18 9854 1( JP-21 r '1 i,' 1 815.3 S 33 J P- 2 3 838.0 I 36„ , :855A P,Z ven. a ~•2j~ 24; ;I I ;CT'? s45.Q L ? :M I 848.0 12 JP-70 jP=2~ s43.0 ' 817.0 rr,1 iT; -3n 903.3 JP- 53 JP-22 I/ 1 , _ . 'I'a~en FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF ti~• EAGAN 58I/730 16 59 32bir3G0~---~ ;7.4/ s / P(l0 61?.0 319/45.0 \ on - Ig„ ( 20" 64 2d' 63 24" 624~~ 7 :y. ar, N r•/ yv i I,` 66 24 60 5? 9/ 5j7J = B' r_ ; 53.3/'1, 1 U r 740 82 0 21 4/, 61 68.0 34 0 40 M.G. ('!ROUND STORAGE 16" r H.W. L. 1059 uI y--- , 07 i 'J 16 n N r !I , 547/71.0. I I1 63A/78-0 4~113 1N, G,zr~ uESCrTT wr1,7 f 1_fll t,~ttl,a - 7 12 12" 121 1 I V 1 7 1 7 12" 26 I t4 4z v/59d 115 97 5/7i0 572/740 77- 18" f I . 65,4 /7 1O I \ tr 7 17 - t 573/710 ' 1 179 L" ~ T• w. ~;C,I~~ ,yi'S 36I' ? l'i " rTO o 16 :JT 1 16 686/86.0 ".I T4 ~7 AO IN WATER DISTRIBUTION MAP CITY OF EAGAN tzS• II s l_== _ ! 9 4 TI-1 , Iran ,~1 - DU ~.~'~J I HILLS U P S ()TT 90 \ I st / • ION N N L0TS ' N - X \ \ '-Z If \~2 \ SAR 3AII: N -AA YOR ~ESCOTT RK STATION S0. I 1 Q .'~~~j WEST Pl'BLISHIN !st ADD BIB 57 ` ~s 8A pC ? ~ 1 rte..-_~ ~ w K lo~ 6 04,cr Doi` II zz i2 ~ 4 W -A 4! i SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN