The URL can be used to link to this page

10/01/1992 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1992 RE: OCTOBER 1 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING The regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will begin at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Because of darkness, the Commission will not be taking its monthly tour but will return to its 7:00 starting time. Unlike previous months, October finds a busy agenda for the Commission. Following the Consent Agenda items are two Development Proposals requiring the Commission's review. Staff has prepared memorandums on these two particular items. Old Business The singular item under Old Business is the Oak Wilt Workshop that the Advisory Commission attended two weeks ago. Superintendent of Parks John Vondelinde and City Forester Tom Schuster have prepared a memorandum in response to the questions that were raised at that workshop. New Business There are three items under New Business for the Commission. Each of these items has a separate memorandum and background information. I would urge the Commission to take extra time to read about Item 3--Pond JP-69 and if at all possible, to drive by the site referenced in the memorandum. Under Parks Development, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan will update the Advisory Commission on the Blackhawk Park construction progress as well as other development items within the Department. Water Ouality There are three items under Water Quality for your review. Water Quality Coordinator Rich Brasch to respond to questions and provide supplemental information on all three of these particular items. Other Business and Reports Intern Dave Running has been doing a research project as part of his internship program with the City. This report will be presented to the Advisory Commission both as a handout and verbally that evening. You will recall that the Department requires its interns to do some type of a research project oriented toward assisting the Department in making a presentation to the Advisory Commission. This will satisfy Dave's requirement and hopefully, still provide the Advisory Commission with some valuable information. I have also attached the Department Happenings and the Parks Maintenance/Recreation update which will also be supplemented by video tape. Following the Roundtable, it will be appropriate for the Advisory Commission to adjourn its October meeting. Respectfull submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation nh/agenda.mem ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, October 1, 1992 7:00 PM Eagan Municipal Center A. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance C. Approval of Agenda D. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 3, 1992 F. Visitors to be Heard G. Consent Agenda (1) Waiver of Plat - Leo Mogel (2) Preliminary Plat - Toby Stevens (3) Town Center 70 14th Add. - Eagan Tower Office Bldg Partnership (4) Town Center 100 11th Add. - Eagan Heights Commercial Park H. Development Proposals (1) Wenzel Addition - Wensmann Realty (2) West Publishing 6th Addition - West Publishing Company 1. Old Business (1) Update on Oak Wilt Workshop J. New Business (1) Park Naming (2) Land Use Request - Lexington/Diffley Site (3) Pond JP-69 - Storm Water Retention - Diffley/Daniel Parcel K. Parks Development (1) Blackhawk Park Update L. Water Quality (1) Phase II - Schwanz Lake Grant Proposal (2) Fish Lake Grant Proposal (3) Report on Wetlands Task Force Meeting M. Other Business and Reports (1) Capital Funds Source Comparison Survey (2) Department Happenings (3) Parks Maintenance/Recreation Update N. Round Table 0. Adjournment Subject to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 3, 1992 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:35 p. m. on Thursday, September 3,1992 with the following Commission Members present: Kevin Knight, Dan Mooradian, Deborah Johnson, Ted Billy, Lee Markell, Jonathan Widem and Jack Johnson. Commission Member Erin Ipsen was not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Park Planner; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator; Paula Nowariak, Recreation Supervisor; Tom Schuster, City Forester and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Director Vraa asked that Whispering Woods 9th Addition be moved from the Consent Agenda to the Development portion of the agenda. Deborah Johnson moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 6, 1992 Kevin Knight moved, Lee Markell seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as presented. CONSENT AGENDA After review of the park and trail dedication issues by Park Planner Stephen Sullivan and review of the water quality issues by Water Resources Coordinator Rich Brasch, Ted Billy moved, Lee Markell seconded the motion to make the following recommendations to the City Council. All members voted in favor. 1. Deerhawk Addition - Dakota County State Bank. This proposal is to be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. The developer is to provide a cash dedication of approximately $4,100 in lieu of ponding on site to meet water quality treatment requirements. Developer should also be allowed to fill not more than 1500 square feet of the woodland that currently lies on site and that this filled area be replaced on site at a ratio not less than one surface acre replacement to one surface acre filled as required under the Interim Program of the Wetlands Conservation Act. 2: Oak Cliff 7th Addition - Brian S. Mangine. This proposal is to be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. It was noted that there are no additional water quality or woodland protection issues required for this site. WENZEL ADDITION - WENSMANN REALTY Stephen Sullivan introduced this item noting that it had recently appeared before the Advisory Planning Commission and was continued but that the park and trails issues could be reviewed at this time. Steve continued that as of the morning of September 3, 1992, land use changes are being proposed for this development changing cluster homes to townhomes and lessening the density. Steve continued that the parks and trails dedication issues were first discussed with the review of the Deerwood School. An evaluation of the park needs in this area will be completed with the zoning and platting of the 80 acre parcel located west of the Wenzel property. Steve continued that the proposal indicates a 25 foot trail easement within the northeast corner of the plat providing pedestrian linkage between this development and Deerwood School. The developer would be responsible for providing an 8 foot wide trail pad at finish grade and the City would 'Instal- the concrete sidewalk using trail dedication funds. The school district has concurred with this trail connection. Advisory Parks, Recreation and NaturalResources Commission Minutes of September 3,1992 Meeting Page 2 Mr. Sullivan then reviewed the woodland resources on this site identifying the woodlands around the pond and the woodland running along the north side near Deerwood School. Steve noted that the original plan was to leave trees around the pond as well as the woodland buffering on the north side of the site. It is unknown at this time what impact the proposed land use change will have on the woodlands but staff will work with the developer when new information is available. Another issue identified by Mr. Sullivan is that of providing recreational open space as outlined in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This requires that each multiple dwelling complex have a minimum open recreation area equal to 200 square feet for each dwelling unit containing 2 or less bedrooms and 100 additional square feet for each dwelling unit containing more than 2 bedrooms. The original plan for 163 units would equate to 32,600 square feet, or .74 acres, of recreational open space required. Steve asked the Commission how they would like to proceed with this particular item. Lee Markell suggested that since this issue would be coming back to the Commission again in October that staff review changes that are being proposed and update the Commission so that they can better answer these questions in October. Mr. Markell commented on the beautiful ridge on the north and west of the pond and suggested that a trail be considered around the pond. He also suggested that consideration be given to providing the pond as a resource to the school. Water Resources Co-ordinator Brasch indicated that he is waiting to see the revised site plan to see what impact it will have on water quality issues. Jack Johnson stated that he like the idea of a trail around the pond and asked if that would be a feasible option. Steve Sullivan responded that the lots extend into the pond but that the City could obtain easements, if required, to allow for a trail. He did add, however, that construction of a trail in this location may be difficult. Kevin Knight asked why staff had preliminarily recommended a cash dedication. Mr. Sullivan responded that the school takes some relief from the park use needs in this PA, however, it appears that the majority of the park users within PA 21 are north of Deerwood school. It was noted that if the site to the west of this development (Bieter Property) is developed into residential, increasing the park usage in this PA, the Commission can request that the development provide recreational amenities within their development and provide for parks dedication credit. Director Vraa added that the future extension of Thomas Lake Road has still not been determined at this time and could have an impact on what the parkland use would be within this PA. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved to continue this item to the October 1, 1992 meeting. Lee Markell added that staff work with the developer to try to establish a trail around the woodland and make a connection from the school to the pond. Jonathan Widem added that the knoll and the white oak treed areas should be maintained, if possible. Jonathan Widem seconded the amended motion and all members voted in favor. WHISPERING WOODS 9TH ADDITION - HILLA, INC. Park Planner Sullivan introduced this item as a preliminary plat application for a single family residential development consisting of 11 lots on 5.2 acres currently zoned as Agricultural. Steve noted that this site is located at the south end of Slaters Acres Road. After reviewing the parks and trails dedication issues Steve noted that the wooded areas consist primarily of oaks, birch and aspen. (O . Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of September 3, 1992 Meeting Page 3 Water Resources Coordinator Brasch reviewed the water quality issues noting that this development is located in the far southwest corner of the City of Eagan and actually lies outside any of the designated drainages for the City. The runoff from this development will discharge to storm water pond designated E-24 in the City of Burnsville and on to the Minnesota River. Because the proposed development drains water to the City of Burnsville, the developer is questioning the rationale of applying water quality mitigation standards required by the City of Eagan when the runoff discharges into a Bumsville storm water pond. Relative to the wetlands issues, Rich noted that about 1600 square feet of the Type I woodland would be filled due to the construction of a proposed southward extension of Slater Road associated with the development. He continued that the developer contends that this wetland is not a natural wetland but was formed because of construction of Storland and Slater Roads which block the drainage to the north. Rich also recommended that the fringe woodland around the City of Burnsville's Pond E-24 be delineated prior to preliminary plat approval and filling, burning or draining of the woodland be prohibited. Scott Hilla addressed the Commission indicating that Rich Brasch has reviewed the issues very well. He continued that he didn't feel that the water quality fees should be paid in Eagan since the storm water pond was located in Burnsville. Mr. Hilla did indicate that the woodland issues had been resolved. Lee Markell asked what water quality fees were required in Burnsville. Mr. Hilla responded that there is a per resident fee but that there are no fees required by a developer for water quality. Mr. Markell asked how far the homes would be set back from the pond. Mr. Hilla responded that he will be requesting a variance to pull the building pads farther away from the pond. Jack Johnson noted that since the development falls within the City of Eagan he was in favor of keeping the cash dedication for water quality. Kevin Knight added that the intent of the dedication fee was to allow for the improvement of water quality throughout the City of Eagan, therefore he felt the fee was appropriate. After further discussion, Jack Johnson moved, Dan Mooradian seconded the motion with all members voting in favor to make the following parks and trails dedication recommendations to the City Council relative to Whispering Woods Ninth Addition. 1. That the proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. That the proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. That the developer provide a tree protection plan for city review and approval. Jack Johnson moved, Lee Markell seconded the motion with alI members voting in favor to make the following water quality recommendations to the City Council relative to Whispering Woods Ninth. Addition. 1. That the development be subject to a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards. In addition, the fringe woodland around the City of Burnsville's Pond E-24 must be delineated prior to preliminary plat approval and filling, burning or draining of the woodland is prohibited. REPORT ON OAK WILT DISEASE IN EAGAN Parks Superintendent VonDelinde introduced this item as a review of the extent of oak wilt in the community and within the City park system. The intention of the report is to provide some background about this disease, its methods of spread, review prevention and treatment alternatives and outline preliminary policy and program alternatives for dealing with this issue. Mr. VonDeLinde continued that this report is informational only and that there is no Commission action required at this time. . Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of September 3, 1992 Meeting Page 4 City Forester Schuster then reviewed a series of slides on oak wilt so the Commission Members could see the effects of oak wilt disease both within the City park system and throughout the City. He noted that red and pin oaks are the most susceptible and burr and white oaks are lease susceptible to the disease. Tom showed slides of the first signs of the disease, how it is spread and how quickly a large area is impacted and destroyed. He added that 1200 - 2000 trees will die each year from oak wilt, with 100 - 120 of those being lost within the park system, if no control program is initiated.. The majority of the tree loss occurs in unmaintained areas making it difficult to access the trees to treat them. It was noted that red oaks will die once they are infected but white oaks may have a better chance of surviving if the disease is caught early and treatment begins. Tom presented the Commission with in-depth information as to the types of treatments available, what information has been provided to the public to help combat this problem and what steps the City is taking to preserve the oaks. Tom continued that the City has a policy in place to allow tree inspectors to condemn trees and to require their removal, however the ideal situation would be that City staff could remove or treat all diseased trees on public property and identify and require removal or treatment of all diseased trees on private property. This option would require a significant increase in staffing levels and funding of contractual budgets which would be cost prohibitive at this time. Tom did note that the State has targeted the north metro area for its first cost share assistance program to help with the large losses of oaks in that community. In 1992 the State has about $175,000 earmarked for oak wilt suppression programs and it is expected that this funding will be available and may increase to the point that Dakota County communities may be eligible for program funding as early as 1994. In conclusion Tom stated that in order to have a successful oak wilt suppression program the City will need to implement a multifaceted public policy including public education, inspection, enforcement, disease abatement and public forest management. Jack Johnson thanked John VonDeLinde and Tom Schuster for their thorough report and stated he was unaware how extensive the problem was. Kevin Knight asked if the City Council was aware of this problem and suggested that if they are not they should be told. He also asked if it was possible to look at funding before 1994. Mr. VonDeLinde responded that they estimated start up costs of approximately $80-90,000 in equipment and $100-120 in personnel. Kevin Knight suggested that the Commission set up a meeting date when they could better review this issue and look at what the priorities should be based on anticipated funding. Noting the importance of reviewing this issue more thoroughly and quickly a meeting date of September 17, 7 PM at the Central Maintenance office was set as a special workshop for the Commission and Staff to more thoroughly review this problem so that recommendations can be made to the City Council. SUMMER RECREATION REPORT Superintendent of Recreation Peterson reviewed some of the summer recreation activities beginning with the continued growth of the tennis program. One of the changes noted in 1992 was the elimination of intermediate level lessons and the addition of Beginner 1 and 2 lessons. The drills offered for adults was well received as were the tournaments for juniors which were well attended. Reservations of facilities showed an 83% increase from 1991 to 1992 which was due in part to the increase in numbers of teams participating and needing fields. Each of the 531 reservations resulted in some type of field set up. It was noted that these numbers did not reflect EAA sites or regular adult softball games. Dorothy continued that if the softball/baseball program continues to grow at the rate it has been there may again be a shortage of playing space. Dorothy reported that the concessions went very wel I but staff may need to look at offering concessions at more league activities. It was noted that there was also a 40% increase in shelter and pavilion reservations. The sand volleyball program could see some increase but with that there could be some potential parking problems. Another site with more courts may need to be addressed based on the volume of use at the Rahn courts. 8. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of September 3, 1992 Meeting Page 5 Regarding adult softball leagues, Dorothy noted that the issue of outside player fees will need to be addressed again this year. Mendota Heights players have been allowed to be grandfathered into the league for the last several years based on their community not offering a league, however, 1993 will be the first year their facilities and league will be on-line so the question that needs to be addressed is whether they will be considered as outside players for 1993. Other successful programs reviewed were the Baseball Hitting Camp, Camp Creative and In-Line Skating Lessons that were offered for the first time this summer. Paula Nowariak reviewed some of the summer programs she was in charge of. The largest impact in summer programming was the institution of a fee for Summer in the Park. This may have resulted in a small decline in enrollment along with the busy schedules children had. Paula continued that she again had an excellent staff to work with for the summer and thanked everyone who helped to make the summer a successful one for the youth participating in Eagan programs. One change seen in the Summer in the Park program was the change in attitude of children. Separating 10-12 year olds into a new type of program may prove to be beneficial in 1993 and will be looked at when planning begins. Paula noted that the addition of optional sites which would facilitate those children who chose not to participate in field trips was not as successful as staff. has hoped and suggested not incorporating that option in 1993. Other programs reviewed included Eaganettes which showed an increase in numbers to 165 from 144 in 1991. It was felt that there may need to be some modifications made to the recital at the end of the program since the numbers of people that attend are becoming too large to be accommodated in the building used for the recital. In conclusion, Paula shared a video of the 5 year old T-Ball program that aired on Good Company which gave the Commission a good feel for some of the summer programming activities. PARKS DEVELOPMENT Steve Sullivan noted that the bid for Blackhawk Park Improvement Contract 92-8 was awarded to Bituminous Roadways. He continued that a preconstruction meeting was held earlier today with work being scheduled to begin September 7th. It is hoped that November 15th will be the completion date. The bid for the boardwalk was awarded to Galva-Foam with an anticipated delivery date of October 12 and installation to begin October 23. Steve continued that a sun shelter will be constructed by the maintenance staff at Northview Athletic similar to those at Walnut Hill and O'Leary Parks. Trapp Farm Park playground is complete and Steve commended the maintenance staff for the excellent job they did in completing that project. Steve also noted that Wescott Station Park playground is complete and is in full compliance with ADA requirements. Playground equipment for Captain Dodd Park will be installed as soon as it arrives. WATER QUALITY Rich Brasch brought the Commission's attention to the executive summary forthe Met Council's interim strategy to reduce pollutant loads to the Minnesota River. He explained that the EPA and the MPCA agreed in 1990 on a goal to reduce non-point source pollution in the Minnesota River by 40% from pre-1980 levels. The strategy would require local governments in the Minnesota River Basin to adopt design standards for new stormwater ponds that will reduce the contaminant loadings from surface water runoff. Rich continued that the City's Water Quality Management Program presently includes many of the stormwater as well as housekeeping "best management practices" required by the Met Council. Mr. Brash indicated that this introduces some interesting issues and the city will need to try to achieve the gals as set forth by the EPA. Jack Johnson asked if the PCA would be enforcing these requirements. Mr. Brasch responded that the Met Council may be in charge of enforcement and they may use the denial of a change in a Comp Guide Plan as a vehicle to enforce the policy along with other option that are yet to be considered. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of September 3, 1992 Meeting Page 6 Rich asked the Commission Members to consider a date when the Wetlands Task Force could meet. The date of September 22, 1992, 7 PM, at the Central Maintenance Facility was scheduled for that meeting. HAPPENINGS Some of the items highlighted in the Happenings included, 6 fields set up at Blue Cross/Blue Shield for bantam soccer,seniors have begun moving into the senior housing site on Cliff Road and staff will be looking at the potential for doing some programming at that site. Other items highlighted included the installation of new dugouts at Rahn Athletic, traits and parking lots sealcoating, hosting of the annual Twin Cities Tree Trust Recognition luncheon, work completed through the STS program and two grant applications submitted to the DNR under their Community Forestry Grants Program. ROUND TABLE Jack Johnson reminded the Commission that they will need to begin preparing to review and update the Parks Systems Master Plan. There is a great deal of work that needs to be completed and since there is no room in the budget to hire a consultant, the Commission should be looking at setting up a series of meetings to begin this process. He suggested that the Commission Members look at the possibility of an October meeting and set the first meetings at the October 1st Commission meeting. The Commission Members also set the date of Friday, September 18 for their annual picnic at Thomas Lake Park. All members were encouraged to participate. With no further business to conduct, Lee Markell moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Secretary Date /6` MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1992 RE: CONSENT AGENDA - OCTOBER 1, 1992 1. WAIVER OF PLAT - LEO MOGEL A Waiver of Plat in order to split Parcel 040-1 for individual ownership located on the SE side of Beau D'Rue Drive in the NE 1 /4 of Section 19. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOBY STEVENS A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately one acre of previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) land located on the SE side of Wuthering Heights Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 18. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. TOWN CTR 70 14TH ADD. - EAGAN TOWER OFFICE BLDG PTNRSHP A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 3 previously-zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres, Conditional Use Permits for a drive-thru facility, and a pylon sign located along the east side of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 4. TOWN CTR 100 11TH ADD. EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK A Planned Development Amendment changing the land use within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development from LB (Limited Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) for approximately 6.4 acres, a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and an outlot and a Conditional use Permit to allow an automobile service station in a CSC district located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road west of O'Leary Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. ~a. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY WAIVER OF PLAT BY LEO MOGEL PROPOSAL A waiver of plat has been requested in order to split a 1.7 acre single family residential parcel into two lots for individual ownership. The parcel currently contains two single family residential units with paved access. The parcel is located on the southeast side of Beau D'Rue Drive in the northeast one quarter of Section 19 (Figure 1). FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the proposed development should be subject to any water quality requirements by the City. WATER DUALITY ANALYSIS This 1.7 acres single family residential parcel is located in drainage basin A. Drainage from the site currently discharges into the storm sewer line along Cedarvale Blvd. which in turn discharges to lowlands along the Minnesota River. Because there is neither additional site construction nor modification of on-site facilities contemplated as part of this plat, runoff quality and quantity characteristics from this site are not expected to change. Therefore, staff is recommending that this site not be subject to either a cash dedication or a ponding requirement for water quality. WETLANDS ISSUES There are no wetland protection issues associated with this site. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Because runoff quantity and quality characteristics will be unchanged as a result of granting this waiver of plat, staff recommends that the site not be subject to a ponding or cash dedication fee for water quality. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp.advispk4.262 U FIGURE 1 ? rg .21 _ ~ °w"y._.. a_ ~ tee- N -re s s •N ~:i ~r4. i~8 > s ~~:~.°.~rw ppN~~ 0 Q~p > iC o sas"s ~g` :c °~es=e~e:Ws =aIi;=~:$F a r~ Q N 4=a:e =:5z € a =azs:s~o_ €aa'.~a°asss~ _ ei' -~..e-Y-.'. :9'-+H ..~Sae.a.•.YH - ••j•-n Hrs w::H e•e" " O Irf~ N is ° ,-€a~...,~sax i~~" ~ _ar~ 3a- 0 :a$ :I° . _ ~aws~ :a'.".sa~:3= r-s$ a a sa - z 12 $ as s a`ass":_: _sa.s:g~~s".zap j$°= -s~ IV a3,oxs~sgt nals~:~-:s~a.€ ~a -lIs3=^zsy~a_g~; ax is"a •:+~:a.ei r~- israr~~s;~Favis7a„ar.a.. -;Res•~. 0 IF°8.. s 1 Fall :iFS3•_" 38£23 14 ~ g www~ HY • ~ -Dizizij His 2- r r a~ _ v e Pe f, n e X X" z• .LN i s ~~rV 61.2 s = 85'1£2 t . • dpi , ta?y r-r-m - `7 J. 0A st`•~~ 3 1~ w7 r t ~4 `l y Y N N 03 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR STEPHENS ADDITION - TOBY STEPHENS (CONSENT AGENDA) PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application consists of one lot on approximately .75 acres of previously zoned single family land located on the southeast side of Wuthering Heights Rd. in the southeast one quarter of Section 18 (Figure 1). FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement or cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This .75 acre single family lot is located in Drainage Basin A. Runoff from this site will be discharged to a storm sewer on Wuthering Heights Rd. that discharges to a small storm water basin, which in turn discharges water to bottom lands along the Minnesota River (Figure 1). The lot is currently vacant. Since the site is too small to accommodate on-site ponding, staff will recommend a cash dedication in lieu of ponding. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $475. This recommendation is being made because development of the site will alter the runoff quality and quantity characteristics of the site by increasing impervious coverage. WETLANDS PROTECTION ISSUES There are no wetlands protection issues associated with this plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS This development should be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality requirements. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp.advispk5.262 /~o. FIGURE 1 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ Uwe ao1K.e0a me a.er,... tee.,... M 1 . r.. r e..~r. • 11738 SOUTH RORFRT TRAIL ROSEWOIMT• MINNESOTA SSSla $17117y17M SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE rewliminavy tint: RTF.VF.NS A00iTTr1N 1 I noT-fewve lnpwr: Nntery anti Toby Stevaela Re-alwr 1 itteh SO feet M•nrr ipt inn: All that part of ct""Imew."t Lot 7. Section IR, Township 27. Range 23 deserib d as follows: Colwoenrinq at a point 551.8 feet rant - i / and 272.35 feet Notch of tha nonthw'at corner of rnvernment Lot 7. Rertion 18. Township 27, Range 231 thence Reset and parallel to the wouth lives of said rsnKrnaent Lot 7 a distance of 190 foet.thenc North and parallel to the vest line of said (Jowernmont tot 7 a distance of 321.11 fret. / i thence Stnlthwesterly a distance of 248.03 feet to a point that in SSh.R feet Past and 434.16 feet IRIrth of the nouthvewe corner thereof, thence Smith and parallel to the vent line of said r..w.rrwp~nt Lot 7 a dinteence of 161.18 feet to epJ / :::a°4S,Nn0 r/tinnre tent + 1r/i...•,..;; t.nt 1 34,500 wp,are feet t Street 1 1 . 300 sgnare trot : j JG Fsi.-.ring ?oninn R. I Single family 1•esi l.ntial ! i~ Q PT,pnleed ftm i vp Swma 6 i rt -~fJ'~•' ::•::•:J-::::•:•:::':%'::•::''•. I J Nt+trti : Area in wrve.l by City sanitary a / r: ~ .'1': , ~ 111/// evwr and vattrr with servirwn • " : ? / provided for this lot. Rand in rturrrntly an enswment road :•:t;~:? ' n~ and has a gravel. surface. rrrpnrrd Ry: pelmnr 11. cehwanx Iand ea,vwynrs Inc. F•, 14750 South Robert Trail I 40 . \ fl Rnsrmromt, "TN Mein t ~0 Tat. 473-17x.9 \1 . •.t Q FINANCIAL OBLIGATION v 70 }:lt~ tre1:='': / Storm Sewer Trunk I e . I t~ 1 ' 'nI int':•'-1 rnri'i /nT 7 ,q T77A/ r i,) l 5'/, fits • ~ ~ .r ~i7~' . 73! !/A/F r);1'; JOT 7 I aa1lt cv oalt MM ON Nrn»f.. a ttlMq qr lev • NM I 1m 1 duly aNMM! ilea Seewrw go" / / . IM 1~ N el» 31111 M Ybsieseel / tv,•. / r 07-30-92 boom oe"WM* MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND WETLAND PROTECTION ISSUES FOR TOWN CENTER 70 - 14TH ADDITION PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a community shopping center on approximately 3.46 acres. The proposed plat consists of one lot on 1.76 acres that will support a retail complex and one outlot of 1.3 acres that will eventually be developed for commercial purposes. The proposed development is located along the east side of Town Center Drive in the northwest one quarter of Section 15 (Figure 1). FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. In addition, there are wetland impact issues associated with this plat application. WATER DUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed development is located in drainage basin D. Runoff from the site will discharge to a series of a ponds classified as nutrient traps which lie just north of Yankee Doodle Road (Figure 1). Eventually, the runoff from this site will reach LeMay Lake, a Class I lake designated to have water quality high enough to support direct contact recreation. The site and drainage area for the proposed development are too small to accommodate a water quality pond that meets recommended standards for depth. In addition, there are better opportunities for protecting water quality in LeMay Lake, such as by purchasing land and constructing a detention basin to treat runoff in the lakes direct drainage area. Given these factors, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding for this development should be considered. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $16,680 and would cover only the obligation for Lot 1 Block 1 of the proposed development. Outlot A would be charged when it is replatted for development at a future date. l1. WETLANDS IMPACTS Field review of the development by City staff indicated that there is one wetland area that could affect development on this site. The wetland is a Type 3 (inland shallow fresh marsh) whose cumulative surface area is approximately .3 acre. This wetland is located on the northern one third of the proposed development and is isolated from other water bodies (Figure 2). The entire wetland would be filled as a result of the construction activities proposed by the applicant. On September 14th, 1992, the developer submitted an official request for exemption from regulation under the Wetlands Conservation Act. The exemption is being claimed pursuant to Article 6 Paragraph 10C in the Wetlands Conservation Act which states that "Activities in a wetland created solely as a result of actions by public entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating a wetland" are exempt from regulation under the Act. The request was reviewed by City staff as well as staff from the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. The findings of the review were as follows: 1) Aerial photographs of the site taken in 1964 and 1970 indicated that no wetland existed at the present site at that time. 2) Soil survey maps of the area developed in the late 1970's indicate an absence of hydric soils characteristic of wetland habitat. 3) Staff checked the Natural Wetlands Inventory maps available for the location of the development. These maps were compiled by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from high altitude aerial photographs taken in May, 1980. The maps show no wetland at this location. 4) The development contract for Town Centre 70 - 1st Addition dated May, 1985 shows that the City installed the street that appears to confine drainage from the area. Based on these findings, it appears that the conditions for the exemption are met and that filling, draining and/or burning of the wetland on the site should not be subject to regulation under the Wetlands Conservation Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS That portion of the proposed development contained within Lot 1, Block 1 should be subject to a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards. The cash dedication associated with Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for development at a future date. In addition, filling or draining of the existing wetland on-site should be exempt from regulation under the Wetlands Conservation Act. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp.advispk3.262 do SCf V FIGURE 1 / ~r C .VI A -17 1 ° t 08 L . 111 AMA EA~AN ? PA - ~NO~' LS.-30.,-,t P .2 E DE 2• CL Y L6FP C-1 iSPERRY CL CI.S. P COACHMAN OAKS P-9. PARK SER CL. V CL.V1 14 C Itl Lr'~ -4 HIMA I DP-13 GHLA `x -27p CL. V co-3 WTI VII DP-6 CL V i P-5 CL. V al.- • ACH WAN FOX PARK ' DP-6. UNISYS + CL. IV D RIDGE CL-3 A 0 V6 CL. V L.S.-7 ae ` A c -h y c MOAD14" A SURREY CL. VI CANOEHa PLA -2a_C DP-Zb ' T fRE HTS, I I• TO~It' INN) N 100 C N TOW 2 C P - 12 Lai CENTRE CL. VII R KI , V 1 2 na it 70 SEGO Al T =pT OCtQO. BLDG ROY OAK i c.! C1 T, L T T Location of Development ' m ~ ~ • T.C. JP-64p• Loci,.. OD I~E78 0 t1LSV CL. ,ICK T F1 C Ls. i y. - 12' 24" JP-1l WE CL. V JP- JP- -cl Sir B P - As ACKHAft. CITY CL. V PARK 27" _ K HALL ARK • e -2p1L JP-10 C CL. Vt IP-29.1 E J-f e- P-2 .1 -49 s _ \ L. 1 -b as , VI 481 w i L.VII Jp CL.II -LP '7 HOSFO Do-,a OHN I R H FIIRSTR FIGURE 2 d s(s . 'E i - 8 d lot flat ~s s=~, E 3 8 E+ E E , t~s HIS Y t ( zw •~yiG' sss !ii "d a F t Z Y C g $ t« 3 9 « « Z X x., pY0• • u Y Q* Jr .1 .9 Zo a) '-H C, 4J 0 ALA- .5p 44 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TOWN CENTER 11TH - EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK (CONSENT AGENDA) PROPOSAL This preliminary plat consists of one lot of approximately .57 acres and one outlot of approximately 5.8 acres located in the northeast quarter of Section 15 on Yankee Doodle Rd. and O'Leary Lane (Figure 1). The entire site will be used for commercial development; however, development in the immediate future is only planned for Lot 1 Block 1 which will be the site for a Valvoline Instant Oil Change outlet. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed development is located in drainage basin D. Runoff from the site will eventually reach LeMay Lake after travelling through three nutrient basins and one storm water basin (Figure 1). LeMay Lake is designated as one of six Class I lakes in the City and is intended to have water quality sufficient to support direct contact recreation. Because there are several nutrient basins and storm water ponds between the proposed development site and the nearest downstream recreational water body, on-site ponding for this proposed development will have little beneficial act in improving or protecting water quality in LeMay Lake. A more desirable alternative is to require a cash dedication for this development which would be used for any of a number of runoff treatment measures closer to LeMay Lake. Therefore, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding to satisfy water quality treatment requirements should be considered for this development. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $4,500 and will cover only the .57 acre parcel designated as Lot 1 Block 1. Outlot A would be charged when it is replatted for future development at a later date. WETLANDS IMPACTS There are no wetlands protection issues associated with this proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the development meet its water quality treatment requirement by payment of a cash dedication for the .57 acre parcel designated as Lot 1 Block 1. Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for future development at a later date. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp.advispk2.262 A. i 3C FIGURE 1 Lx -3. IV c S C MOO 24" 3p0 Q .VI -17 qtr pN A PAS L. I11 w iu E p AND L S.-.30- VA P- .2 E DALE Cu Y L~~N SERRY CL U.S. P T I, ~ COACHMAN P-9. r PARK SER V CENT C 14 mi I11 ~ f HMA 1#- 4 DP-13 GMLA -27D CL. V DDITI L. VII CP-3 OP-6 P-5 CL. V CL- VI 3 ACH AN FOX PARK DP-6. D RIDGE UNISYS CL. IV C 6 OP-4 CL. V - A a l C-h A 0 . V Y gy0OdL MaW 14° 3 D-sCO SURREY 1 3'd GAIrCCNa TSCL ARE 2NG• ht~w i H HTS f I T, Location of Development 100 j ADD. V 2nd Ih~l^ 0NSECO \1 T 1 z0. EA PT DC4DD. Ist 0-w lim f, aL-% ROY O K ) 5 %J PA . 1 Cl TQr TOW1J CE I S s 1 T TH 70 F}RST C. JP-6@D• C 00 IX o em L /JP- L I. C L.S. - 1 J L 24" JP-11 w R K L. V AM I Jp- LA RUE JP - CITY CL. V 27' HALL ARK 3 JP-10 b CL . VI p-2 , we ` e II f 4L. V11 4 -b 48' 7-et - MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PARKS PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1992 REGARDING: WENZEL ADDITION PROPOSAL An application has been submitted to the City of Eagan requesting the rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development and Preliminary Platting of 161 lots for single family and quads within 40 acres. BACKGROUND The parcel is located south of Deerwood Middle/Eleir ary School and north of County Road #30. The Commission has reviewed this parcel as a component of a Park Service Area #21 study. The proposal at the time was whether the City should acquire property for a school/park with the improvement of the middle school. The school.'park scenario was not pursued. The Commission felt that the future land use of the 80 acre undeveloped property west of the Wenzel property would determine the park land needs for P.S.A. #21. The Commission also reviewed a site plan at the September 3 meeting. Staff updated the Commission that the developer was proposing significant site plan changes to those previously submitted. These changes had not been evaluated by staff prior to the September meeting. It was agreed that the revised site plan would be brought before the Commission at the October 1 meeting. Commission agreed with this amended schedule and then made several recommendations for the developer's consideration: The revised site plan preserve the oak stand at the northwest edge of the pond. The revised site plan provide the required recreational open space. The developer examine the potential of a trail encircling the pond. o~CI. ITEMS FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following items: 1. What is the Parks Dedication obligation? 2. What is the Trails Dedication obligation? 3. What is impact to the woodland resource? 4. What is the Recreational Open Space obligation? ITEM #1 - PARKS DEDICATION The parcel is within Parks Service Area #21. As mentioned within the background an evaluation of the park needs will be completed with the zoning and platting of the 80 acre parcel located west of the Wenzel property. Therefore, staff recommends to the Commission that this plat be subject to a cash Parks Dedication. ITEM #2 - TRAILS DEDICATION An 8' bituminous trail exists adjacent to the subject parcel on the north side of County Road #30. An assessment review concludes that the Wenzel property has not provided towards the cost of this trail. Therefore, staff recommends to the Commission that this plat be subject to a cash Trails Dedication. Deerwood Elementary/Middle School lies to the north of the parcel. The proposal indicates a 25' trail easement within the northeast comer of the plat providing pedestrian linkage between the 2 adjacent parcels. Staff has reviewed this trail alignment with School District personnel. The School District approves this alignment and will provide a concrete sidewalk to this trail easement. The developer needs to coordinate with the School District compatible grading, alignment and scheduling of work. The developer shall be responsible in providing an 8' wide trail pad at finish grade. The City of Eagan will be responsible for the installation of the concrete sidewalk. The developer has not decided whether a pond trail will be included within the proposal. J. ITEM #3 - WOODLAND RESOURCE A majority of the site is in cash crop. A woodlands mass encompasses Pond BP-4. The vegetation type is primarily willow, boxelder and poplar. Scattered white oaks exist northwest of the pond. The developer has agreed to preserve these oaks. Staff concludes that the impact to the woodland resource is minimal. ITEM #4 - RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE Chapter 11 of the City Code provides for Recreation Open Space within all multiple family developments. The code reads as follows: 12. Each multiple dwelling complex shall have a minimum recreation area equal to two hundred (200) square feet for each dwelling unit containing two (2) or less bedrooms and one hundred (100) additional square feet for each dwelling unit containing more than two (2) bedrooms. Said recreation area shall be a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any ponding area. Source: Ordinance No. 52 Effective Date: 4-25-75 The 144 units of multiple at 200' square feet equates to 28,800 square feet. The development plan provides several large greenspace areas which meet the recreation open space requirement. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: 1. The plat be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The plat be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. The developer grade an 8' wide trail pad to the Deerwood School property within the trailway easement. The developer coordinate the alignment, grading and sequencing with the School District. 4. The developer provide a tree protection plan for city review and approval prior to final platting. 5. The proposal preserve the oak stand located within the northwest edge of the pond. 6. The proposal provide 28,800 square feet of recreational open space. DIWENZAPRMEM MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR WENZEL ADDITION/WENSMANN REALTY PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a mixed single family and multi-family residential development consisting of 181 units on 40 acres and located along the north side of Diffley Rd. in the southeast one quarter of Section 21 (Figure 1). The land is now zoned for agricultural uses, so a change in zoning to allow a mixture of residential uses has been requested as well. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. There are also wetlands issues associated with this plat. WATER OUALITY ANALYSIS This development lies in drainage basin B, a short distance up drainage from Blackhawk Lake, a Class 1 water body designated to support direct contact recreation. Runoff from the proposed development will eventually reach Blackhawk Lake and, if not treated, would degrade its quality. The site contains Pond BP-4, a 2.5 acre, 6.5 acre-foot waterbody designated as a Class 7 storm water pond in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. The pond receives both direct and indirect runoff from over 3,800 acres of the City. Just up drainage from this pond and lying along the south side of Diffley Rd. is Heine Pond, an 8 acre lake designated as Class 1 to support direct contact recreation. In 1979, an effort was made by the City to reduce nutrient loading associated with storm water runoff to Heine Pond. Prior to this time, all storm water carried down the main trunk line toward BP-4 was discharged to Heine Pond. A structural change in the system was made so that runoff from small storm events would completely bypass Heine. Larger runoff events which exceeded the capacity of the 33• system in this reach would overtop a weir that would allow some of the discharge to enter Heine temporarily. Unfortunately, the storm trunk line between Heine Pond and BP-4 is very flat. When the outlet for BP-4 was constructed in 1979, it was installed at an elevation that caused water to back up far into the relatively flat inlet pipe between BP-4 and Heine. The result has been that the structure designed to bypass most of the storm water runoff in the trunk line around Heine has been rendered ineffective. Consequently, the high normal water level in Pond BP-4 is contributing to excessive nutrient loading and water quality degradation in Heine Pond. The City's engineering consultant and City staff evaluated several options for resolving this threat to water quality in Heine Pond. (A report outlining these options and proposed recommendations is being prepared by the City's consultant.) The best option appears to be to lower the elevation of the control structure in Pond BP-4 and drop the normal water elevation in BP-4 by about 3.2 feet. This would be done as a public improvement project funded by the City using funds from the Developer Water Quality Dedication Account. Because the proposed Wenzel Addition development will also discharge storm water that could adversely affect another Class 1 water body down drainage (Blackhawk Lake), ponding to treat this runoff should be required before discharge off-site. Analysis using the City's Water Quality Model indicates that a nutrient detention pond conforming to NURP standards would need a total volume of 2.4 acre-feet to meet treatment standards for this development. This additional volume would be provided by an excavation in Pond BP-4 and completed by the developer, subject to approval of City staff. WETLANDS IMPACTS The developer has completed a preliminary inventory and impact analysis for wetlands located on the Wenzel Addition site. Portions of the analysis have been forwarded to the City for this report, but the final report must still be submitted. Inventory Based on this preliminary information, the site contains three wetlands which encompass a total of about 4.72 acres (Figure 2). The largest of these is a Type 5 open water wetland with a Type 1 bottomland wooded fringe consisting largely of eastern cottonwood, black willow, box elder, green ash, and American elm. This wetland is associated with Pond BP-4 and is approximately 4.45 acres in surface area. The wetland exists in a significantly degraded condition, due primarily to livestock grazing and widely fluctuating water levels associated with storm sewer discharge that increase the water levels in the pond by over 12 feet to accommodate runoff from large storm events. The second wetland is a .02 acre Type 2 wet meadow located near the northeastern edge of the first wetland. Finally, the third wetland is located in the north central portion of the site, northwest of the Deerwood Elementary parking lot. This basin encompasses approximately .25 acres of Type 1 bottomland forest dominated by eastern cottonwood and box elder. Impacts There are several potential wetlands impacts associated with this development. First, a reduction of 3.2 feet in the normal water level of BP-4 to protect Heine Pond is expected to drain a maximum of .76 acres of wetland associated with BP-4. Because the City is requiring the reduction in water level that is causing the impact, staff recommends as equitable that the City would be responsible for providing replacement for the reduction in wetland area as required by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Since replacement opportunities are limited on-site, the City would probably meet these obligations off-site. A project to upgrade Diffley Road will likely include several ponding areas that could serve as replacement acreage for these wetland impacts. City staff would work with the technical review panel set up under the WCA to make sure that replacement areas meet the requirements under the Act. There is also some wetland encroachment associated with the development of the site. The primary area of wetland encroachment is along the south end of BP-4 and is associated with the access to Diffley Road (Figure 2). The location of this access road is dictated by Dakota County because of traffic and safety concerns. The only other potentially acceptable site for a road entrance to the development is located in the northeast portion of the site, but has been rejected by the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission. The current estimate of wetland filling associated with construction. of the road is .25 acres. Because alternative access sites do not exist, the developer maintains that the impact is unavoidable. An additional .02 acres of wetland. encroachment is anticipated in the north central wetland basin. Encroachment on this basin was reduced from a previous estimate of .09 acres by adjusting the alignment of the road responsible for the encroachment. Replacement Proposal for Developer Based on these estimates, the total anticipated wetland fill proposed by the developer is .27 acres. The developer proposes to use the existing low area at the northeastern limits of Pond BP-4 to expand the wetland area by excavation. Figure 3 provides a draft grading plan that indicates .34 acres of wetland could be created in this area. This proposal, when implemented, would meet the 1:1 replacement requirements for the WCA. The wetland creation area would be designed to mimic natural wetland conditions. Half the wetland perimeter will have gradual 10:1 slopes within two feet above the wetland edge. Contours will be curved to provide a natural wetland shape. Newly graded areas will be furnished and smoothed with black soils excavated from the bottom of the existing wetland basin. Disturbed surface soils within the wetland compensation area will be seeded to a mixture of native grasses and wild flowers to provide visual and wildlife habitat value. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the development meet its water quality obligation by creating through excavation an additional 2.4 acre-feet of storage in Pond BP-4. The excavation plan must be approved by City staff. Staff also recommends approval of the proposed wetland replacement plan, contingent on submission of a final wetlands impact and mitigation report and compliance with the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp:advparks.240 yf 24" ME a~ FIGURE 1 JP- BID CITY SLACKHAft. PARK 27" K HALL ' 8 -2~, • C P-29.1 R2 N II B-`a P-2 P- ? CL. v 11 All 1- -s 4$" b-b ! i i L. VII JP j i JOHN XAAwu / 8P t== to ERWOcC - , LAMDI Location of Development r SC}OQ:y 0 I LIAN r I AP-4V. PARK A IC CL. IV Z2 8P-25 Pii cL V cL.v11 P BE • AP- 35 i 8 - si'2. r S/ H. C L. V B P- CL.VW lot tA G C. 3. A M. s I uf4c Af ~ / / - 8 ASrER' E B P- 5 3 AT F0 Q 24 C L. I I p I a 0 .2 8P-23 THO L. I BP- T I 1d I CL . - mod! I vs T ' IB,'' ~ bLi~+Y ~ EASEMENT !c? - - - e 8 P- I a~ A P- C .VII { C" E/ PL I + \ C I f SAFAR LE 1 EAT a 18P- MA L. VI CL. V P-14 z VI .R jxO -L.S.-21 27 BL • L.5 --C H FIGURE 2 ` I i GYP ]L (PFO ~II'~ t • I N Is. sa I ssl , 1 _ Y '~f i ;.S I 4 jl j r .rNN....~ .•..~•....a. 1 V `1!i t S 1 Na L 9 F:a: >f:,•r N•o M E St T 8 9 d t w.~wrr fi«s, w..w..... • 21 v - s . . T » f - i wrst,w l~•• w~ wYrrr 1' b L 1 G I N 4 Z rrw~ls ~.J Jt ss ,•s . F 1l • ~ v 3 4 S •I 6 7 Y b li ~..r1 V a e r II f I MI ,Y1 *_4 T" 9az. + u U -r ,f TYPE 2 (PBAIB) pdwn~ Y. To.Y~ sr. awMas ` F sl rs . Q ( 1 t ww ....w" wN" ~ r "Saw { C ;t '"11 t F- Is 11 4 - t `N•'°s.......n. « rr. AL S., =1 d 11m1 t , r I 'r l.. ~ if i I 7 d I sr ar ~ f sr I -.r E 14 M 3 f I I~ a 1• G T C T s si 20 Age si llL~MHL.i A MI , q JP, I r '~<<st> rasuuttoN L..Y~161::J cap a r y ~ ~ YN..~~ U• 0 R 0 M 1 N I U M S ? :i + y Sr,GLL IMICT NpMM t7 d,[•ttVfL IONRNtOMtS 34 7 r 4 • r1s :tom 40 rr N n r, I• a { f IM& Na Cr carts: I" t~' 111 r.GGlat: azsaeRCs 1 - r IOfNStIY: wilts • ..1l. p •s aL'r s o- N$MANN HOMES. INC. J C I I M I` •i,= Y 51 I. E °L-.h • FIGURE 3 oooo .1.1, 111. ~ ~ 1 1 , 10 f' fi~ o ~1f'1! ! r - J { ' tl W 1 111~ i 1 11 1 / a~ j' j f .sr , . o . ` b N 11/1.11 0 t'' a 1 J / ~ Q W ~w r;- x d MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL - RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 RE: WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION - WEST PUBLISHING Application Request Separate applications have been submitted requesting the rezoning of approximately 2.2 acres from light Industrial to Planned Development and a preliminary platting of 4.7 acres. Background The preliminary plat incorporates 2.2 acre Lembke 1st Addition parcel with an existing 2.5 acre parcel which is within the West Publishing Planned Development. The site is currently being graded for a future office/warehouse. For Commission Review The Commission will need to review and make recommendations regarding the following items: 1. What is the Parks Dedication obligation? 2. What is the Trails Dedication obligation? 3. What is the impact to the woodland resource? Parks Dedication The 2.5 acre West Publishing parcel is within the Planned Development and has fulfilled its Parks Dedication. The 2.2 acre Lembke parcel is obligated to a cash Parks Dedication. Trails Dedication Both sites have been assessed for the existing trail along Wescott Road and are not obligated to Trails Dedication. 1-/. Woodland Resource The site has been graded and is void of significant plant material. For Commission Action The Commission may consider the following recommendations: The 2.2 acre Lembke 1st Addition parcel, be subject to a cash Parks Dedication. SS/dj D1/westpub.apr MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND WETLANDS ISSUES FOR WEST PUBLISHING - 6TH ADDITION PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a light industrial development consisting of future offices and a warehouse on 4.7 acres located in the southeast one quarter of Section 13 on Wescott Road (Figure :t). The development is part of the West Publishing complex on the far eastern edge of the City. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. The Commission will also be asked to make a recommendation regarding how that requirement should be applied. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS The development is located on drainage basin G. Runoff from the site will eventually reach Burr Oak Pond (GP-1) after travelling through several intervening storm water basins. Burr Oak Pond is located in Burr Oak Park and is designated as a Class II indirect contact recreation water body. It is the highest valued lake in the drainage. The developer has expressed a desire to meet the site's water quality requirement by excavating in Pond GP-4 to create sufficient wet pond volume to meet treatment standards for the development. Pond GP-4 is 1.3 acres in area and is currently a dry extended detention basin located just east of the proposed plat on property owned by West Publishing. Based on an impervious coverage figure of 75% for the site, a wet pond with approximately 1 acre-foot in volume and a minimum average depth of 3 feet would be necessary to meet these treatment requirements. The developer's representative has stated that this site will contain no impervious area in the immediate future. However, the land will still be zoned to allow light industrial use and will likely be used for an office and/or warehouse complex and possibly loading/parking facilities at some time in the future. Because the total amount of impervious surface on this parcel will not be known until final building plans are formalized, the developer has requested that plat approval be conditioned to allow a reconsideration of wet pond size requirements when a building permit is requested to authorize those improvements. The wet volume of the pond would then be revised to reflect the actual impervious coverage of the site and the pond constructed when improvements are made to the site. WETLANDS IMPACTS There are no wetlands protection issues associated with this proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the developer meet water quality requirements for the proposed development by creating wet volume in Pond GP-4. The wet pond will be 1 acre-foot in volume and a minimum of 3 feet in average depth. These figures should be reviewed and revised based on actual impervious figures for the site at the time any building permit is issued for the site. Excavation of the pond must be completed prior to construction of any impervious surfaces on the site. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/cm 29wp.advispkl.262 EP i .VEP` . WO 38 e \CL.VII CL, FIGURE 1 T `m , 6 EP- 1 6 P-2 CL.V1 C L V I i I v -8 E_ CL. V11 • BUR OAK LS SECON . NQ5 G PHE SAGA INDUS Go 12 5 42" -d NO. ADO. GLIVI t e E P 2.3 IL UPS , 4~ SCOTT T JP-33.1 j tsr CPv9 CLViI L~REli AOOrT10N I .VIII GARDE YL 4 RL VI KS. T R JP-16.1 .V1 11 MID 3 CL !V ! ! S.AR24 P-59 J D ' s, L. P-17 YORI3T0eC I NI` CL.VII ~i +2 L_VI1 % `rte WCSCOTT I N \ " 0 (n STATI JP-18 Mi GP-13 CL. 11'x CL.VII Location of Development ISHI I Y L GP-4 CL_ CL.VI o 2Q JP-;(8 C L. 1 V ytz v / J 0 JP-5 It C . 1 _ r CL_ V JP- 20.1 '6 J BRIOL w CL.V Pa -54 L. V11 R000 JP- 23 Z CL.V 36 , JP-2 1 CLV N 12' • L JP-251 O N CO T Y 53 JP-25? CL. V 1 V CL VI MEMO TO: EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS TOM SCHUSTER, CITY FORESTER DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 SUBJECT: FOLLOW-UP TO WORKSHOP ON OAK WILT DISEASE At the Special Workshop of the Commission on September 17th, several questions were raised by Commission members about the costs and benefits associated with implementing a comprehensive oak wilt suppression/prevention program in Eagan. This memorandum is intended to respond to these questions with some very preliminary information and estimates for the Commission's review. Question #1 What is the anticipated cost of implementing a S -year program of oak wilt suppression and abatement? In response to this question, staff has done some preliminary estimating of costs for a comprehensive oak wilt suppression program. A chart depicting projected costs in the areas of public education/technical assistance, public property management, and regulation/enforcement can be found in tabular form following this memorandum. As the Commission will note, the estimated cumulative costs in each of these individual program areas is $170,000, $345,000 and $158,500, respectively. The total cost of the program for a five-year period is estimated at $682,500, or. an average of $136,500 per year. It is the opinion of staff that this estimate represents the worst case scenario in terms of total projected program costs. It should be noted that the potential exists for the City to participate in Federal and/or State cost sharing programs which could reduce the City's financial commitment by several thousand dollars. However, because Dakota County has not yet been qualified for this program, it is difficult to ascertain the future availability of grants and any funding limits that might be imposed on a community-by-community basis. State officials are currently indicating that the program could begin as early as fiscal year 1994. Should that happen, it is likely that the City's financial requirements for a four or five-year oak wilt abatement program could be significantly reduced. It is important to keep in mind, though, that these would be reimbursable grant funds and that in no event would cost sharing exceed 50% of the eligible total program expenditures. In summary, if all three public policies were implemented as outlined, the Forestry Department would be expanded on a temporary basis (4-5 years) to include: a full-time tree inspector/technical assistance coordinator, two se^sonal forestry technicians, $126,000 in 41. capital equipment for tree removal and harvesting, and $143,500 in contractual and consulting services for oak wilt removal and prevention, public education, and technical assistance. In addition, approximately $40,000 would be available for reforestation of park and open space areas infected by the disease. Question #2 What is the estimated value of the oak trees that would be saved by implementing a comprehensive control program? Staff estimates that 1,200 to 2,000 trees are dying from oak wilt each year in Eagan. This estimate is based on observations of the community, response to public inquiries, and also upon the recorded annual loss of oaks in Apple Valley (850) and Lebanon Hills Park (1,500 to 2,000). Based on a very conservative estimate, the implementation of a comprehensive oak wilt control program could be expected to reduce the number of trees lost to oak wilt by a minimum of 300 each year. Using the State of Minnesota's shade tree evaluation formula (the same data base used for park trees), an average 14" diameter red oak in good condition, growing in a typical wooded residential setting, would have a value of approximately $1,983. Applying that value to 300 trees per year would equate to an annual benefit of about $594,900. Extrapolating this same figure over the life of a five-year program would mean a total value or benefit to the community, in terms of preserved trees, of approximately $2,974,500. Based on these assumptions, which are again considered to be conservative, the benefit to cost relationship of a comprehensive five-year oak wilt suppression program would be about 4.4 to 1. In other words, for every dollar invested in the program, a return of approximately $4.40 in preserved forest canopy would be returned to the community. Question #3 What would be the cost for contracting aerial photography and mapping of the City to determine the location and extent of oak wilt infection centers and diseased trees? Based upon information gathered during a conversation with Steve Cook, Consulting Forester and owner of the Cook Company, aerial photography of the City could be accomplished for about $600-$800. Adding the costs for aerial photo interpretation and mapping would bring the cost to approximately $2,000. Question #4 What is the estimated cost of contracting out the regulation and suppression of oak wilt disease on private property? Steve Kundee, owner of Kundee Company, has municipal oak wilt suppression contracts with several municipalities in the metro region. His services include aerial photo and interpretation, disease tree identification, notification of property owners, reporting activities to the municipal forester, and also installing root graft barriers with a vibratory plow. A preliminary estimate of the cost for a program of this type in Eagan is a minimum of $25,000-$35,000 per year, of which $7,000-$10,000 is anticipated as the portion being spent strictly for trenching with the vibratory plow. We hope that this provides the Commission with the additional information that was requested. Staff will be available at the October 1st meeting to respond to any further questions or concerns that the Commission may have. As part of the Commission's discussion, consideration may also want to be given to recommending a joint workshop with the City Council to further explore options for implementing an oak wilt suppression program. Joh VonDeLinde Tom Schuster Su erintendent of Parks City Forester JKV/sb Enclosure 29wp: fiveyr.266 4: ESTIMATED FIVE-YEAR PROGRAM COSTS OAK WILT SUPPRESSION AND ABATEMENT -CITYOFEAGAN- 1. Public Education/Technical Assistance:. Budget Function Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Cumulative Personnel $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $15,000 $ 75,000 Capital 16,500 -0- -0- -0- -0- 16,500 Services/ Consulting 18,500 12,000 9,000 9,000 5,000 53,500 Operations 5.000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5.000 25,000 Program Totals $55,000 $32,000 $ 29000 $_29.000 $25,000 $170.00 2. Public Property Management: Budget Function Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year tive Personnel $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $25,000 $ 125,000 Capital 126,000 10,000 14,000 10,000 10,000 170,000 Services/ Contracting 7,000 7,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 25,000 Operations 8.000 8.000 8.000 5.000 5.000 34,000 Program Totals $1660 $_50.000 $ 2 00 $_43.000 $4 $345,000 3. Regulation and Enforcement: Budget Function Year 1 Year 2 Year Year 4 Year 5 Cumulative Personnel $ 19,500 $ 19,500 $ 19,500 $ 17,000 $17,000 $ 92,500 Capital 15,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- 15,000 Services/ Contractual(') 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 ; 10,000 65,000 Operations 8.000 8.000 8.000 6.000 6.000 36.000 Program Totals $.52,5 0 42 500 $42,500 $ 3 0 $33,Q $2 (2) (1) Reimbursable cost through property tax assessment/billing: $50,000 (2) Total estimated program costs after reimbursements: $158,500 4. Total Costs - Programs 1, 2 and 3 Combined: Budget F n i n Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Cumulative Personnel $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $292,500 Capital 157,500 10,000 14,000 10,000 10,000 201,500 Services/ Contractual 40,500 34,000 29,000 22,000 18,000 143;500 Operations 21,000 21.000 21.000 16,000 16.000 95.000 Total - All Programs $277800 $114.5 00 $ $1 5 $1010 0 $732,500 Net cost after reimbursables: $682,500 Average cost per year for program duration: $136,500 29wpprogcon MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION ROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 RE: LION'S CLUB REQUEST - PARK NAMING ISSUE: A letter of request to name the Lexington/Diffley park land parcel, intended for future athletic field site development, as "Lion's Park" has been received by the department. BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter from Shawn Hunter, which is self explanatory, .regarding the naming of the Lexington/Diffley park land for the Eagan Lion's Club. Historically, the Commission adopted a policy for the naming of parks in the early 1980's. That policy is attached. In the naming of parks, the Commission has followed a traditional procedure which included a sub-committee of the Commission. The "park naming committee" was headed by Dick Carroll who was a previous member of the Advisory Commission for a period of twelve years. The sub-committee would meet and review the history of land ownership which Mr. Carroll would research at the Dakota County Recorder's Office. The research would preview the ownership of the property back into the mid-1800's and from this, potential names or ideas of names would result. In addition to land ownership, the sub-committee would review other potential names for the park based on the neighborhood subdivision, streets, topographical features of the park or historical events that were indigenous to Eagan and this area. The subcommittee would then recommend to the Commission between two and four names for the new park and the rationale for that particular name. A preferred name was then passed on as a recommendation to the City Council for formal adoption. In addition to the Lexington/Diffley park land parcel, the Department has also acquired another parcel of land which could also be considered for naming at this time. This park parcel is the park acquired from the Manor Lake and the Lakeview Additions. This park parcel has now been graded; and construction of the street and parking lot is expected to be completed late this year. The Commission may wish to consider an option which defers the naming of both the Lexington/Diffley site and the Manor Lake park parcel to a sub-committee for name recommendations. 5_3 - DISCUSSION: Mr. Hunter's letter is accurate relative to the contribution by the lion's Club to the Parks and Recreation Department of $100,000.00 Several years ago, the Lion's also made a contribution to Goat Hill Park of a scoreboard for left field. Other contributions by the Lion's Club have been made to the City, Fire and Police Department. The Commission may wish to consider, as an alternative to naming the park lion's Park, the naming of a particular feature within the park after the lion's Club. Although it is not eminent, it is obvious that there will have to be some type of building or facility within Lexington/Diffley Park. Perhaps a structure or pavilion might be named after the Lion's Club. FOR COMMISSION ACTION: The Advisory Commission may wish to take action to name the Lexington/Diffley park land parcel as Lion's Park, or defer action until additional information and discussion is held. The Commission may also wish to consider deferring naming of this parcel and that of Manor Lake to a sub-committee for further review and the naming of both parks simultaneously. vr'T. September 14, 1992 Dear Parks Commission: As a former three year member of Eagan's Advisory Parks Commission, I understand the importance of selecting appropriate names for our city parks. I am also aware of the process by which names are selected. Soon, the Lexington/Diffley park will be named by the Parks Commission. That is why I am writing to you. The Eagan Lions Club is an important, integral part of the community. The club contributes more than $100,000 a year to various community organizations, charities, and individuals with special needs. In fact, the Club has contributed more than $100,000 for Eagan parks improvements alone. The Lions Club is also the primary sponsor and organizer of the City's only community event - the 4th of July parade, carnival, and fireworks. Many communities around the world have chosen to recogni.ze the efforts of their Lions Club and Lions Club International by naming a park Lions Park. I am writing on behalf of the Eagan Lions to request that consideration be given to naming the Lexington/Diffley site Lions Park. In the interest of brevity, I will not continue to enumerate the many ongoing efforts and contributions of the Lions Club. Suffice it to say, the local Lions Club is a fine organization with the best of community-spirited intentions. I hope you will consider our naming request with the same intentions. If you need any additional information, please contact me or our Lions Club president, Brian McNally. Sincere Shawn Hunter 5' . CRITERIA FOR NAMING EAGAN PARKS 1. Parks may be named for the living if they have contributed 75% of the property or 757. of the land cost for the park. 2. Parks may be named for the deceased after 50 years have elaped from the time of death. The deceased may include local or national heroes and national, state or local officials. 3. Parks may be named for streets, neighborhoods, historic events and characters, trees, flowers, places and feature names great ideas, and mythological and descriptive names. These names should be indigenous to Eagan. 4. Parks should not be named for civic organizations in order to avoid community conflicts. 5. Park or facility names should not be changed without good cause. They should be named carefully and with permanent intent. 6. The criteria should be reviewed from time to time, and if necessary, periodically revised to offer the naming committee a practical, up- to-date and helpful tool through which practical decisions may be reached and by which difficult situations may be amicably reconciled. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 RE: REQUEST FOR GOLF DRIVING RANGE ISSUE: The issue before the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Commission is a request to allow the use of the Lexington/Diffley park land parcel for a golf driving range for a period of 3 to 5 years. BACKGROUND: Mr. Mike King, owner and operator of the Tee Time Golf Driving Range which is just east of Lexington Avenue, has requested that the City consider a portion of the Lexington/Diffley site to be used for a golf driving range for a period of 3 to 5 years. The area that is now being used for Tee Time Golf is being developed for single family homes requiring the driving range to close. Mr. King would like to relocate the golf driving range operation to an area generally defined as being south of the water reservoir and west of the old gravel road previously known as Lexington Avenue. CONCEPT: Details of a site plan, a timeline and financial arrangement have not been developed. It is the concept of utilizing park property for golf for a period of 3 to 5 years that is before the Commission at this time. If the Commission is in general agreement that this type of arrangement is worth pursuing it would be appropriate for formal plans and detailing financial arrangements to be pursued and brought back before the Commission. GENERAL LAYOUT: The golf driving range would be approximately 300 yards long and approximately 350' wide at the tee area. In addition to the driving range, a small building to accommodate equipment and the sale of range balls would be constructed. A miniature golf area is also proposed. A potential exists for a Pitch 'N Putt putting green. A satellite would serve as toilet facilities. Parking, which is now available adjacent to the city's water reservoir, would also have to be expanded to accommodate additional vehicles. The golf driving rang would have a fenced barrier along one or both sides of the driving range immediately off the tee to catch any divergent shots. DISCUSSION: Lexington/Diffley parcel has been owned by the City for approximately 3 years. During that time period the property has been leased for farming purposes in an effort to generate some revenue, but more importantly to deter extensive weed growth and to keep the soil active. 57. As the Commission is aware, the site has been designated for athletic field development and a general concept plan has been prepared; although it is safe to say that a great deal of refinement is required. The timeline for development of the site as an athletic facility is largely undetermined. Certainly everyone is aware of the need and pressure to begin development of these facilities. To that end, and in conjunction with the construction of County Road 30, Commission and Council has previously given approval for potential development of all or a portion of the site to be used as a "balance" area for County Road 30. Staff is aware that the construction of County Road 30 will require approximately 80,000 cubic yards of common borrow. Previous soil borings have indicated that the Lexington/Diffley site has an enormous amount of granular material, which is ideal for roadway construction, immediately below the topsoil. A contractor may very well be willing to strip and stock pile topsoil material, take away the required amount of material for roadway construction and then respread the topsoil to a pre-defined grading plan and seed the site. (80,000 cubic yards is the equivalent to a 50 acre site being lowered by one foot.) The uncertainty and the implications of this possibility will undoubtedly need to be considered by the Advisory Commission when reviewing this request. Another concern addressed to Mr. King is an access to the site. County Road 30 is going to be under construction next year. Access to the driving range will undoubtedly be limited during the Diffley Road reconstruction process. Another issue for the Advisory Commission to consider is the length of a lease. Mr. King has asked for a five year period but may be willing to accept a three year. Clearly, the longer lease would be more advantageous to Mr. King; but too long of a lease may interfere and present a problem for eventual development of this site for additional parks purposes. Too short a lease and the investment won't be worth the time. FOR BOARD ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION: Staff is seeking consensus or direction on the Advisory Commission as to whether it should pursue further detailing plans and financial arrangements for a potential golf driving range on this site. Whether it views this is as being a constraint to the potential development of this land for athletic site purposes; or if there is not a conflict. DIGOLFDRRN.MEM y` r ~h lF M rJ - f r r Y ril MCIE3 O V i rh .~1 5t ~ ~ s Z / 'ti si 4 ! ~g± `sL it . 1. J • lr~. v + ti , ~~~_~I~ ~ r t~ ` to ~ ~V""~ MY k " r . •bL.L~ F 1 , tom- r r t 1 MEMORAN DUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1992 RE: JP-69 DANIEL DRIVE/DIFFLEY LAND PARCEL ISSUE: This is primarily an informative issue for the Advisory Commission alerting them to and seeking suggestions on development of a water quality/storage pond on a seven acre parcel south and east of Daniel Drive and Diffley Road. BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter from the Director of Parks and Recreation to two adjacent residents of the seven acre parcel south and east of Diffley Road and Daniel Drive. This parcel of land was acquired by the city as part of the HUD acquisition when the city needed to acquire the Lexington/Diffley land parcel. HUD required that the city also acquire this particular parcel in addition to Lexington/Diffley site, as one purchase. With development of the property west of Dan::; Drive now underway, storm water will be directed towards this parcel. Storm sewer and ponding easement had already been obtained by the city prior to its acquisition. No final design was completed for the ponding area. With the plans completed for County Road 30 and its impact on this land, staff has now begun the process of "designing" the pond limits for storm water on this parcel. After having walked the site recently, staff felt that there was four design criteria. First, to retain as many trees as reasonably possible along the east property. Second, to provide the necessary volumetric water retention and improve water quality. Three, preservation of trees on the entire parcel. Four, configuration for eventual resale of the property for lot development and re-capture the Parks investment. Based on these four general criteria for pond area development, staff is beginning the design process for this parcel and the necessary storm water-pond retention area. Staff is bringing the issue before the Advisory Commission at this time to familiarize them with the project and to obtain additional concerns and input information from the Advisory Commission. RESIDENT'S LETTER: Also attached are copies of the letters received by the City of Eagan relative to this parcel from two adjacent homeowners. As you will note, the homeowners have shown an interest in acquiring some of the property primarily for the purpose of tree preservation. Sale of the property to these owners as requested in the letters is possible, but would not be without some difficulty. Staff also has a concern that sale of the property may have an injurious effect on the eventual development and platting of the property for residential development. Upon visiting the site, it is also clear that the homes have encroached into this parcel with the development of their back yards and vegetable garden. Also attached are preliminary drawings prepared by the City Engineering Consultant showing the parcel/ponding area. These will be presented at the meeting. FOR COMMISSION ACTION: No official action is required by the Advisory Commission at this time. Input by the Advisory Commission pertaining to design criteria for the ponding area on this parcel is being sought. KV/dj D11JP69 APRMEM «w.... • w ~/If N0011U/ IlffOllOc Ills. ..MMtIr: 4101, W,MT WIM{ WK too TM 1 - •O N - r 1/!P AIKt sIJM UIMMIMY +r ..q ? ^A.. ..1 :71k)1.4IM111m,t{*MM N.E. 1/4 SEC.26. . •1.1$1ML•../ ylMll?.L•• 1MMR S.E.!%4 SE:: 23,T2; R23 MMiNMY _ _ STATE •w iAID • HIGHWAY -f..+rll1 NTH-- COUNTY (DIFFLEY RQ) IM 80 VC1111 8 ~ s • ! 4 s 8 • _ y 1 11 11 O • + M ~ _ +O 10 1 • to ~1 ,1 i fi b w IQ J7 w ,2 .r •l~ 1 I 00• d ~4! s ! ! >.1 B 9 "b • t a s `ro tv~ AID A• 11 P c fuf 1 4171 ? r 1 • b J4, v s an ! ~a 'pJ~ ' u w Y s's s' QOM 1 . sltAO a It ? . , d i IR TRAIL 'A ~•4 • p 14 } E D W sit li at Is ~W. • Is i 1 OqN! fl\~, A 01 I sO Ia IffA ti ' Ir Iysf 2 ' I I! .w w sl • • I all i ! ~ s ~VF 14 6 at as a w `7A'[ c bra ~ / All 10 ? ~O y .i IM 1 Uri-wG~ ~ Za ~I t! ~w 1 M •Ifi ' ` o - - _ t r, rlI N j,~a \ ~ `1\r ` - A - A r\ z ~ ~ s ~ Ij + C~K Se~den r . w .w. C ' + DANIEL DRIVE p Ya~aron i .b... Associates, Iso. PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY w,,..,......,,..,..,, CITY OF EAGAN r r..~. a.... rr.r... r S I r wM~ rr~r - city of aagan MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACILITY THOMAS EGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT Mayor EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4600 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 PATRICIA AWADA FAX: (612) 6814612 FAX: (612) 6814360 PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members September 23, 1992 THOMAS HEDGES CRY Adrv* katrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Mr. & Mrs. Patrick and Charmaine Connolly 621 Curry Trail Eagan, MN 55123 Mr. & Mrs. Joe Whetstone 917 Curry Trail Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Connolly and Mr. & Mrs. Whetstone: Your letter addressed to city staff members has been forwarded to me. Please allow me to provide you with some background information on the parcel referenced in your letters which I believe will help you to acquaint yourself with the history and the proposed use of this particular parcel. The property in question was acquired by the city approximately 3 years ago as part of a land acquisition from HUD (Housing and Urban Development). HUD had acquired the land when the owner/developer defaulted on loans and the property reverted back to them. In order to acquire property south and west of the Lexington/Diffley intersection for an a park site, the city also had to acquire this particular 7 acre parcel located adjacent to Daniel Drive. At the time of its acquisition, the parcel was zoned R-4 or multiple dwellings; having been part of a Planned Unit Development. From the time the city had acquired the property, it was the intent of the city to re-market the property to re-coup its investment. However, before doing so the city felt some of the same concerns expressed in your letters; that too many trees would be lost with multiple family residential use. Consequently, the city "down zoned" the property to single family; this zoning being much more compatible with the adjoining land use and consistent with the city's intent to save trees. With the construction of Daniel Drive, services were stubbed to the property thus providing the necessary availability of sewer and water for future development. Marketing for re-sale of the land, either for eventual platting as single family lots or as THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal OpportunIty/AffirmatIve Action Employer RECEIVED SEP 15 1992 Patrick & Charma.ine Connolly 921 Curry Trail Eagan, MN 55123 Mr. Ed Kirscht City of Eagan 383( Pilot. Knot) Road Eagan, MN 5 51 22 _ September 14, 1 ()92 19 es -rte We are writing to express our concern for the plans that. the City of Eagan appears to have for the plot of land located on Daniel Drive between Diffley Road and Curry Trail. Our property borders on the area in question. This is a lovely area with an abundance of trees-and wildlife, inelusing deer, fox, woodchucks and hawks. We are concerned that if the city sells this plot of land to a developer for house-, the trees would be removed unnecessarily. This has happened in most: of the developments in our area., and we feel that this would he a shame, since it would be unnecessary to remove all of the trees. This area. is so small that. it should remain somewhat the way it now is. We understand that if houses are built in this area, some of the trees would need to be removed. But, we do not. want the line of trees directly adjacent to our property to be removed. These lreds are at, the back of our property and would provide a. beautiful backdrop to any lot. Fagan hills il.self a "Tree City" and yet, looking around, it. is evident. that this isn't taken into account. when grading land for homes. This plot of land in question is so mininal in size, that it, would be a shame to remove any of these trees. We would like to know what, can be done to save at least the line of trees that. are directly adjacent to the back of our property. It seems senseless to destroy the small area of natural area that is left. Another point. to consider, is how the placement of lots will affect the asthetics of the area. If the lots are to face Daniel Drive, the lots will be very deep and narrow.- Also, the lot directly hehing our property would have the large electrical box in its driveway. If you would consider placing the lot.s so that the hacks would butt up to ours, and create a. cul-de-sac, that, unsightly box would he positioned at, the back of the property. It. would also create a way to save the trees in question without any detriment to us or the new lots. 6 We will wait for a. response from you indicating your plans for this land and what we could do as concerned citizens, to avoid the removal of all the trees. Cordially, ?4 Ce VED SEP 1s 1992 a'gzsm R 7-f (I 11114t4e 14 3.15~1_DIIS__~o OVP,.--~Ollal.'~ -UD!1L~t!51`i~~I 4'Q_, _~17E!n!Jt _~~~Is~~ _/11i3 _ ! `y lt~}~ ~?:rI D -_1JG'e...hi ~iJ[ ___l1I_.-1-~%_._l~v Cc~ ~%_.J~if~.._. LI /!L.C r__ i r_._._ i1 'Y-- ' 4-e~loe--Jiwsloyi _ :~~~o,~?t G~ dawn _1~~1_~ ,1_im 70 ~~°~J~___,3~?ty%/_lv~l Ji1~/f~t197~ __%rJo__!Jc<<,CS.__ . A__.u W5 w~ p _ Wo o~ ~C~ tJ~`S sr, ~ >l~ra! D0&4r -V _ / i 14&19 ._1 -10.. aoe :xge~!_ yu?~?_~~ =_G~ _~3 a _ Gn d /lUnl/. c3l__.O?•e__/'~iy~ ?_~s// - - r - - - ' _ _ /110 __.,o r oar. oii• - t<'{_._1,J 7It ~/Q_.C~ • , ____1G'~~'4 t11Z, f Ql~e___11 i _Y~'<~ ~°E'• fr Iil I{.j I 1 ~1 X. I cyi ac ~ 10, a s t DtvFtEy '`,0 . TO: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS,RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: APPROVAL OF CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR SCHWANZ LAKE AND FISH LAKE. DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 Staff would like to review with the Commission two grant proposals for submission to the Pollution Control Agency's Clean Water Partnership Program. Both will need to be approved by the Council, so a Commission motion to support Council approval of the grant applications would be helpful. The submission deadline for grant applications is October 29. The first is a grant for the implementation phase of the Schwanz Lake project. Staff has reviewed the diagnostic/feasibility and implementation plan components (Phase 1) of this project with the Commission on several occasions. An Executive Summary for Phase 1 and a budget summary for Phase 2 are attached. It should be noted that the Pollution Control Agency has still not completed its technical review of the project report, but periodic communication with the reviewers indicates no major problems at this time. Final comments are expected within the next 10 days. The second grant application is for a Phase 1 assessment of Fish Lake. This will involve a modification of last year's application for Fish and Blackhawk Lakes. Staff will have rough budget figures available for discussion at the Commission meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions or would like more information. Thanks.' Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator cc. John VonDeLinde EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results and recommended implementation plan for the Diagnostic/Feasibility Study on Schwanz Lake. The project was funded by the City of Eagan, the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Diagnostic Study The Diagnostic Study included a 12-month water quality monitoring program and subsequent data and land use assessments which characterized the sources of water quality problems in the, lake. The Feasibility Study, which followed, evaluated the various alternatives for water quality improvement, and developed an Implementation Plan for the project. Schwanz Lake is important both as a recreational facility, and in the overall management of stormwater runoff in the southeast corner of Eagan. A majority of Schwanz Lake is bordered by Trapp Farm Park, a City park that received over 20,000 visits from area residents in 1991. Trapp Farm Park provides considerable public access to the lake. The current watershed to Schwan Lake is approximately 360 acres. This area is primarily composed of open/undeveloped/parkland and single family residential land uses. At ultimate development, the watershed is expected to expand to just under 900 acres with undeveloped land developed as single family residential. Ultimate development will probably be reached in 10-15 years and is expected to include almost 600 acres in Eagan and 300 acres in Inver Grove Heights. Schwanz Lake covers 11.6 acres with a mean depth of 6.5 feet and maximum depth of just over 12 feet. The lake currently receives stormwater runoff from six storm sewer outfalls, and discharges through a pump station located at the southeast end of the lake. All but two of the storm sewer outfalls drain only areas directly surrounding the lake. Four of the storm sewers drain only areas discharging directly to Schwanz Lake. This area is collectively referred to as the direct drainage area. The other two storm sewers drain a combination of direct drainage area and upstream ponds. One of these also drains Hay Lake and the other pond, LP-32.1. Water quality sampling was completed both in-lake and at three of the six storm sewer outfalls. The total area of the watershed monitored by the three storm sewer sites was 312 acres, or about 85 percent of the total watershed area. Results of the monitoring showed that Schwanz Lake was in the "worst" 75 percent of the lakes in the Central Hardwoods Region in terms of both mean chlorophyll-$ and Secchi disk transparency. Schwanz Lake was in the "worst" 90 percent of lakes in the region for total phosphorus (TP) concentration. Monitoring also suggested that 80 to 90 percent of phosphorus and suspended solids loadings were contributed by the direct drainage area. In addition, the lake currently does not meet the MPCA criteria for supporting swimming. Problems which limit use of the lake are primarily due to excessive algal blooms. Monitoring data suggests that primary productivity (i.e., plant and algal growth) is limited by the availability of phosphorus. Thus, a reduction of the phosphorus load was determined as the necessary action for reducing algal blooms. Currently, the average growing season TP concentration for Schwanz Lake is 80 micrograms per liter (µg/l). A TP reduction goal to a level of 55 µg/1 was established for the lake. This goal was set as a long-term management objective. The goal is sufficient to restore the lake to the MPCA classification of partially supporting swimming, improving general aesthetics, and reducing the severity of algal blooms. As part of the Diagnostic Study, water quality modeling was completed. Models were calibrated based on existing conditions and then modified to predict phosphorus loadings and concentrations. Additional models were completed for ave -,3ge year hydrologic conditions, and future conditions under full development. The future conditions model predicted an improvement in the quality of Schwanz Lake without any new remedial activities. This predicted improvement was due to a diversion of storm sewer runoff which was completed between the monitoring period and report preparation, as well as the future increase in watershed area. The future expanded watershed contains numerous wet ponds. In addition, the expanded portion of the watershed drains to Hay Le before reaching Schwanz Lake. The model predicts that Hay Lake and the ponds have h, ;phosphorus removal efficiencies. The net effect of the increased drainage area and ponds is as =icrease in both the hydrologic and phosphorus loading. However, the hydrologic load is expected to increase substantially more than the phosphorus load and will mitigate, by dilution and flushing, the phosphorus load. This future conditions model was utilized to evaluate the potential remedial activities in the Feasibility Study. ~l3 Feasibility Study In the Feasibility Study, a number of alternatives were evaluated to reach the phosphorus concentration goal. These alternatives ranged from administrative alternatives such as fertilizer management education programs, to structural alternatives such as treatment pond construction. Each of the options were evaluated for their benefit in improving water quality, their estimated initial and long-term (operation and maintenance) costs, their technical feasibility, and social acceptability. Special consideration was given to alternatives which address problems and reduce pollutant loadings at their source. The final plan includes the following elements: • A public information/education program which will focus on informing, enlisting support, and improving nonpoint source pollution prevention practices by residents. • Street sweeping to reduce the sediment and phosphorus loads from single family areas in the direct drainage area. • Conversion of the wet-dry detention basin LP-32.1 on Rogers Court to a wet pond. • Creation of a sedimentation basin in the south bay of the lake. • Extension of the storm sewer outfall from Hay Lake past the proposed sedimentation basin. • Construction of a new wet pond (NURP basin) on park property near the park beach. • Hypolimnetic withdrawal to reduce the pool of soluble phosphorus in the deeper portions of the lake. • Continued monitoring to determine project effectiveness. Estimated costs over the 4-year project duration are $207,790. i• 7*. PROJECT FUNDING The funding for the Schwanz Lake project will be a combination of grant, in-kind, and local cash. A summary of the project funding is provided in Table 5-10. TABLE 5.10 PROPOSED PROJECT FUNDING San Cash In-Kind Total Dakota County Extension 655 655 City of Eagan 35,123 68,117 103,240 MPCA (Clean Water Partnership) 103.895 103.895 $139,018 $68,772 $207,790 Summary of Wetlands Task Force Meeting September 23, 1992 Commission Attendees: Jack Johnson Kevin McKnight Lee Markell Dan Mooradian Jon Widen Other Attendees: Paul Krauss-Director of Planning, Chanhassen John VonDeLinde Meeting summary: Overview of wetlands physical character, value, and regulatory framework by Rich Brasch. Presentation by Paul Krauss on Chanhassen's wetlands protection efforts. Main Points: 1. The City of Chanhassen has had a wetlands protection ordinance on the books for eight years. They are currently involved in updating that program and combining it with water quality and surface water management strategies. 2. 400 wetlands of all sizes and types identified (located on aerials, evaluated in the field) and classified in Chanhassen which is 24 square miles compared with 34 square miles for Eagan. 3. Wetlands assigned one of four classifications- Pristine, natural, agricultural/urban, and utilized. Four of the inventoried wetlands are pristine, 145 natural, remainder either ag./urban or utilized. Pristine wetlands are protected from all impacts, and natural wetlands generally recieved treated stormwater only. The other two categories include heavily impacted wetlands which may of may not recieve substantial protection or restoration efforts. 4. Emphasis is now on improving quality of natural wetlands-and to lesser extent ag/urban wetlands- through pre-treatment of stormwater, maintaining hydrologic balance, adjustment of water level control structures, removal of drainage systems, requiring buffers, etc. recieive treated stormwater only. 5. Approximately $40k earmarked for wetlands mapping, classification and ordinance development by Chanhassen. 6. Classification of lakes is separate from that of wetlands. 7. Chanhassen is about 35-40% developed compared with 60% for Eagan. Meeting Results Summary: 1. Initiate cursory wetlands survey of entire City (using aerial photos with limited ground truthing) to determine extent of wetland resource in Eagan. If possible, add factor that evaluates value and degree of degradation of wetland. (Estimated cost > $4000) 2. Analyze data to establish policy direction:' Options: a. Do only enough to facilitate compliance w/ WCA b. Provide assistance to, and a check on, developers c. Provide another level of protection to wetlands, possibly by beginning enhancement or restoration program. (Might want to go with more intensive inventory and classification, especially in unplatted areas, and possible ordinance development) PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS OCTOBER, 1992 1.*« Registration for fall recreation activities began on September 12. Several people, 10 - 15 in number, again chose to arrive early to form "the line". It really is not necessary to line up early, staff discourages the practice. Some folks just must enjoy visiting with other early risers. 2.*« The Eagan Athletic Association anticipates basketball registration to reach 950 participants this year for the in-house program. Last year 834 children took part. The 110 teams of the in-house program will be joined by the 10 travel basketball teams which provides activity for an additional 100 youth. 3.*« E.A.A. Travel Soccer has begun its planning discussions for the Second Annual Eagan Invitational Soccer Tournament. The director, Wayne Huot will be meeting with department staff as soon as possible to discuss the scope of the project. 4.*« National Youth Sport Coaches Clinics for basketball coaches will be held on October 8. Recreation staff will conduct three clinics simultaneously at the Middle School. Work on the Cable TV system in the council chambers has dictated the new approach to the clinic schedule. 5.*« Intern Dave Running and a group of the senior citizens attended a Minnesota Twin's game on September 9. The team won that day! 6.*« Staff at Northview Elementary School have approached Recreation staff concerning forming a partnership with the Eagan Senior's Group. The scope of interaction is not yet defined. 7.*K Staff anticipates increased needs for outdoor ice time from Eagan Hockey Association teams. In addition, the Ringette program anticipates increased needs for practice ice. The new pressure on facilities is a result of growing numbers of participants and less indoor ice available to EHA. The Ringette program currently registers with Rosemount Hockey, however, 50% or more of the girls in the program reside in Eagan. Therefore, some practice ice in Eagan is appropriate. 8.*« The Eagan Parks and Recreation Youth Tennis Program has received a local Excellence status award from the United States Tennis Association. The Commission will hear more of this at the November meeting. 9.*« Staff will be preparing an updated Trails brochure this fall. The new trail segments on Lone Oak Road and Cliff Road are appearing at an opportune time for inclusion in the brochure. 10.*« The new Dakota Civic Theatre is reaching out to individuals and businesses in the South of the River Communities, in search of capital funding to enable plans to proceed. Community interest in the concept of the theatre is supportive. Prospective tenants such as community choirs, bands and dance groups have inquired about renting space. The next two or three weeks will tell whether the idea proceeds or is withdrawn. 11.*« There are 81 volleyball teams in the various leagues this fall. Thirty-eight coed recreational and 12 coed officiated teams play on Friday nights at 5 elementary schools and Dakota Hills Middle School. Fourteen men's teams, 9 women's and 8 coed officiated teams play on Tuesday and Thursday evenings at Dakota Hills Middle School. 12.*« Tiny Tots Recreational Activities began the week of September 28. Six classes are being held at Goat Hill, Rahn and Bridle Ridge Shelter Buildings. Bridle Ridge is a first time site for Tiny Tots. 13.*« Fitness and Fun, Games Kids Play and Creative Expressions preschool programs will begin October 2. h/. 14.*« Jon Oyanagi attended a workshop dealing with cultural inclusion or recreation professionals on September 25 at Linwood Recreation Center in St. Paul. 15.*,A Fall Softball ends the first week in October. Sixty-four teams participated. 16.* c Touch Football runs through October 28. Games are played Wednesday evenings at Goat Hill Park. 17.*« The Who-Dunnit Hike was held September 19 at Ritter Farm Park in Lakeville. The "South of the River" cities organized the walk. One hundred twenty-five participants attended and enjoyed a beautiful day along a 10 kilometer trail with free refreshments afterward. Grilled corn-on-the-cob was a big hit. This was the second annual walk which is also a sanctioned Volksmarch. 18.*« The Forestry Division had a busy month in September with the replacement of about 80 trees in various locations in the park system. The Division also cooperated with the County Sentencing to Service Program on the clean up and mulching of all shrubbery beds in the park system. In addition, the STS also assisted with the replacement of wood mulch around the beds at the Northview tennis court with larger granite landscape rock. Some problems were being experienced with washout and erosion of woodchips onto the tennis courts during heavier rains. The new rock mulch should offer a permanent solution to this problem. 19.*« New dugouts were constructed on the baseball field at Rahn Athletic Park during the month of September. Thanks goes to Scott Eppen and Gary Skogstad of the Operations Division for undertaking this project. 20.*« Don Buecksler and Steve Hadden teamed up to install concrete pads under the bleachers on Fields #7 and #8 at Northview Park. This project completes the installation of concrete pads at all the city's three primary baseball and softball field facilities. The addition of these pads will help to expedite the mowing program, and facilitate easier cleanup of litter and debris. 21.*« In late September, and extending into October, the County's Sentencing to Service Program took a lead role in making improvements to the varsity baseball field at the Eagan High School. These improvements included the installation of a new outfield fence replicating the look of a traditional "ball park". Steve Hadden and Steve Taylor of the Operations Division also assisted in this project with the installation of concrete pads for new dugouts at this location. The varsity field will be a future site for city and school district sponsored teams and activities. 22.*« The new playground at Captain Dodd Park was completed on September 24th. Parks staff Alex Lammers and Paul Graham demonstrated their excellent construction skills in the completion of this project. This newest playground is a product of Denmark and offers new play and socialization experiences for children not previously duplicated in neighborhood play facilities in Eagan. Our thanks go to Alex and Paul for their fine craftsmanship and quickness in installing this new recreation facility. 23.*« Fall turf maintenance projects continued at full capacity in the month of September. The first phase of fall fertilization was completed by Paul Graham and Alex Lammers. All athletic and neighborhood play fields were also aerified in late September thanks to the work of Stan Schneider, seasonal maintenance employee. In addition, the city continued a regular mowing program through use of it's two high-capacity mowers, gangmower and six follow-up trim mowers. 24.*,, A new temporary lighting pole was installed at the Trapp Farm sledding hill. The addition of this third lighting fixture should help to illuminate the lower portion of the hill and make for safer and easier sledding. DP/dj DIIWAPPEN.MEM * City Council - October 8, 1992 *Commission - October 1, 1992 RESEARCH OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTS CAPITAL EXPENDITURES DURING THE LAST THREE YEARS DAVE RUNNING PARKS AND RECREATION INTERN OCTOBER 1, 1992 INTRODUCTION This study is on Parks and Recreation departments Capital Expenditures for the last three fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992. Ken . Vraa the Director of Eagan Parks and Recreation Department expressed an interest in finding out where other parks and recreation departments are receiving their capital outlay money. The information in this study may or may not generate new ideas on gaining new funds for parks and recreation departments capital expenditures in the future. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study was twofold. First of all it was for the researcher to gain a better understanding of capital expenditures and for the researcher to gain the knowledge of where Parks and Recreation Departments get the funds for Capital Improvements. Secondly, this study was to determine what the capital expenditures have been for municipal parks and recreation departments for the last three fiscal years 1990, 1991, and so far in 1992. To focus in on what the researcher is looking for, he asked the directors of the departments interviewed what capital items they have obtained or what projects they have done, how much they have spent for these items and projects, and where they received the funds for these items or projects. With this information in hand we will be able to see where funds are being obtained by the different municipal parks and recreation departments throughout the twin cities metropolitan area. HYPOTHESIS These Hypothesis were constructed to help in the research of parks and recreation departments capital expenditures. 1. Larger parks and recreation departments, those having over 20 employees, will spend more money on capital expenditures, then smaller parks and recreation departments, those having less then 20 employees. 2. Thirty percent of the parks and recreation departments questioned would have received a grant within the last three fiscal years. 3. Fifty percent of the parks and recreation departments questioned have received Parks and / or Trails Dedication monies from contractors within the last three fiscal years. DEFINITION OF TERMS For the consistency of interpretation, the following term has been operationally defined: Capital Expenditures: For the purpose of this study Capital Expenditures will be capital outlay for items obtained or for work done that relates to the cities parks and recreation department, at a cost of $ 5000.00 or more. 2 METHODOLOGY The subjects for this study consisted of ten Parks and Recreation Departments and the directors of these departments (Appendix A). The departments were selected from around the twin cities metropolitan area. The cities were selected based upon weather they were a relatively new and / or still growing community or weather they were a community that has grown almost to capacity. Data collection was done in a three stage process. The researcher first mailed out a cover letter (Appendix B) to each departments director. The letter explained who was doing the study, what the project was about, and what kind of information was needed to be obtained from the departments for this project. The next step was to call each director and set up an appointment to meet with them at their earliest convenience. The final stage in data collection was to go and interview each director that was contacted by phone. Interviews were set up over a week and a half long time span. The interviews themselves were expected to last no longer then 15 to 20 minutes. By stating what was needed from the directors in the cover letter the researcher felt that 15 minutes would give them plenty of time to get through the interview. The questionnaire (Appendix C) was short but to the point. The questionnaire had only general questions or guidelines on it for the interviewer to follow. The questionnaire would be filled out by the researcher during the interview. After all of the interviews where completed the data collected was then analyzed by the researcher and a formal report prepared. 3 LIMITATIONS The cover letters for this project were mailed out to 12 parks and recreation departments directors. The researcher was only able to set up 10 interviews out of the 12 letter that were had sent out. Two of the directors were out of town on vacation during the collection process so they were excluded from the interviews. The researcher felt that his time would have been restricted if he would have waited for them to get back from vacation and then tried to get an appointment to see them. Figure # 1 Average Expenditures Per Dept. For The Past Three Years Millions 1.98 2.5 1.6 2 0.a 0 Under 20 Employees ® Over 20 Employees By 81xs Of Dspt. 4 Hypothesis # 1 - Larger parks and recreation departments, those having over 20 employees, will spend more money on capital expenditures, then smaller parks and recreation departments, those having less then 20 employees. Figure #1 indicates that even though a parks and recreation department may have a large number of employees it doesn't mean that they will have more money, or spend more money on expenditures then those departments that don't have a large number of employees. It would have seemed that if a department has a large number of employees then they would have a larger budget and would be able to spend more money on their expenditures, but this was not the case for all the subjects in this study. The average amount of money spent by the larger departments was $1,608,656.75 per three years and the average for the smaller departments was $1,985,571.50 per three years. Inver Grove Heights, was a big exception under this situation, they were one of the smaller departments and had spent a total of $5,506,000.00 over the last three years. This was about four million dollars higher than most of the others in the smaller employment size category. Inver Grove Heights received 4.4 million dollars in the years of 1991 and 1992 to build a city owned and operated golf course. They got this money from their Land Fill Abaitment Fund, which gives to the city $1.00 per dump into their landfill. If that 4.4 million dollars that Inver Grove Heights used for their golf course was taken out of the total of the smaller employment size group then hypothesis #1 would have been supported, but as it shows in figure #1 this hypothesis was not able to be supported. 5 Table # 1 : Frequency Of Receiving A Grant In The Past Three Years NUMBER OF GRANTS RECEIVED YEAR LV WSP EP PL MG AV SLP IGH RV ED 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1991 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 TOTAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 LV = Lakeville AV = Apple Valley WSP = West St. Paul SLP = St. Louis Park EP = Eden Prairie IGH = Inver Grove Heights PL = Plymouth RV = Roseville MG = Maple Grove ED = Edina Hypothesis #2 - Thirty percent of the parks and recreation departments questioned would have received a grant within the last three fiscal years. The facts that are indicated in (Table #1) show that hypothesis #2 can not be supported. Only two out of the ten departments interviewed have received a grant within the past three years. The city of Eden Prairie received a in 1991 for $87,000 which was used fora lake park site. The city of Roseville received two grants in 99992~They were an Outdoor..Recreation Gran for,$35,000 and a Community Development Block Grant for $25,000. The money from these went for trails development and for a park 6 play area. There were no other departments that indicated receiving a grant during the years of 1990, 1991, or so far in 1992. Figure # 2 Departments Recieving Parks / Trails Dedication Monies Number of Dept. 6 T 6 4 4 2 0 Yes No Hypothesis #3 - Fifty percent of the parks and recreations departments questioned have received Parks and or Trails Dedication monies from contractors. Figure #2 showed that 60 percent of the departments interviewed do get monies from contractors for Parks dedication or for trail dedications, therefor this hypothesis is supported by the data collected. Figure #2 also shows that Lakeville, P- lymouth, Maple Grove, Apple Valley,_ Inver Grove Heights, and Edina all get Parks and or trail dedication monies. Plymouth had the highest total of expenditures out of their Parks Dedication Fund with $1,184,200.00, Inver 7 Grove Heights was second with $1,083,000.00, third was Lakeville with $541,799.82, fourth was Maple Grove with $450,000.00, fifth was Apple Valley with $219,500.00, and Edina was Last with $60,000.00 Statement of Funds and Sources The information sheets (Appendix D) will show what each of the ten departments have done with their capital expenditures over the last three years. The dollar figures on the information sheets have been rounded to ease calculation. Listed below are funds or sources of monies that were used all of the parks and recreation departments during the past three years. Many of these funds are relatively the same but with a little differences in their names. The funds will generally come from the same places and be used for the same type of expenditures. Numbers 3, 4, 9, 14, 16, 19, and possible number 2 come from generally the same places. Developers pay their share to the cities parks department and they put it into their fund, what ever the name of it is. Numbers 1 and 5 are used as sale objectives. The city will sell, for example, a certificate to raise money to buy a new truck. Lakeville does this because they do not receive any money from their cities general fund. Funds / Sources 1. Certificate of Indedness (selling of certificates) 2. Trail Development Fund 3. Park Development Fund '4. Park Dedication Fund 5. Capital Note 6. Public Works Reserve 8 7. Interest Income Fund (overpayment of sewer tax, receive interest off of it) 8. General Fund ~1-9. Park Improvement. Fund 10. Lease/purchase (Ice Arena, use revenues to pay) 11. Inferstructure Replacement Fund 12. Equipment Replacement Fund 13. Capital Improvement Program "CIP" (1% levy, cash reserve extra monies) -14. Park and Rec Fund 15. Municipal Building Fund _16. Park Acq. Dev. Fund 17. Land Full Abaitment Fund 18. Central Park Auxiliary Fund .^19. Park Land Fund (Internal Financing, Bonds-not General Obligation) 20. Economic Retention Fund (Tax Increments) 21. Community Development Block Grant 22. Outdoor Recreation Grant 23. LAWCON Grant 24. Utility Transfer West St. Paul now receives 85,000 a year from their Interest Income Find: They receive this money because of an over payment of the sewer taxes in the city. The parks department received $ 85,000 of interest off of some of that over payment for yearly parks improvements. This is only the second year that West St. Paul has received this money for parks improvements. Eden Prairie is paying for a new Ice Arena By way of a Lease / Purchase program. The revenue off of the arena will pay off the lease which will in turn pay off the purchase of the arena. Their new arena is costing Eden Prairie 2.3 million dollars. Inver Grove Heights has been building a new golf course since 1991. They received $ 4.4 million from their Land Fill Abailment Fund. The city receives $1.00 per dump into the local land fill. - 9 The tables below indicate each source that each department has used in the past three years and how much money was spent under that source per year. LAKEVILLE: Certificate of Indedness Trail Development Fund Park Development Fund 1990 62,000 56,000 16,000 1991 18,000 0 364,000 1992 0 0 168.000 TOTAL 80,000 56,000 548,000 WEST ST. PAUL: Capital Note Public Works Reserve Interest Income Fund 1990 12,000 0 0 1991 77,000 79,000 85,000 1992 0 45,000 85.000 TOTAL 89,000 124,000 170,000 EDEN PRAIRIE: General Fund Park Imp. Fund Lease Purchase LAWCON 1990 167,000 1,202,000 0 0 1991 87,000 63,000 0 87,000 1992 435.000 0 2,300,000 0 TOTAL 697,000 1,265,000 2,300,000 87,000 PLYMOUTH: 4 Park Dedication Fund Inferstructure Replacement Fund 1990 511,000 0 1991 566,000 300,000 1992 119.00 0 OTAL 1,269,000 300,000 T MAPLE GROVE: General Fund Park Ded. Fund CIP Equip. Replace Fund 1990 44,000 237,000 183,000 0 1991 20,000 76,000 213,000 0 1992 0 143.000 513.000 52.00 TOTAL 64,000 456,000 909,000 52,000 10 APPLE VALLEY: General Fund Park Dedication Fund 1990 75,000 55,000 1991 8,000 90,000 1992 35.000 75.000 TOTAL 118,000 220,000 ST LOUIS PARK: Park & Rec Fund Municipal Building fund Park Imp. Fund 1990 111,000 49,000 255,000 1991 34,000 56,000 126,000 1992 35.000 130,000 199.000 TOTAL 180,000 235,000 580,000 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS: Park Acq. Dev. Fund General Fund Land Fill Abaitment Fund 1990 433,000 14,000 0 1991 650,000 9,000 2,200,000 0 1992 0 0 2,200.00 TOTAL 1,083,000 23,000 4,400,000 ROSEVILLE: Cent. Pk Aux. / Found. Vehicle Replacement Fund 1990 384,000 40;000 1991 25,000 59,000 1992 114.000 57.000 TOTAL 523,000 156,000 Park Imp. Fund General Fund Outdoor Rec. Grant 1990 10,000 75,000 1992 35,000 1991 250,000 0 1992 200.000 Comm. Dev. Block Grant TOTAL 460,000 75,000 1992 25,000 11 Edina: General Fund Utility Transfer Developer Fund 1990 344,000 100,000 20,000 1991 249,000 100,000 20,000 1992 245.000 100,000 20.000 TOTAL 838,000 300,000 60,000 CONCLUSION In conclusion, this study indicated that most Parks and Recreation Departments are receiving monies from relatively the same Funds and / or Sources as most other departments. A few of the cities are getting money in ways that others can not, for example Inver Grove Height has their Land Fill Abaitment Fund which they built a new city owned golf course and West St. Paul has their Interest Income Fund which they use to make park improvements. Eden Prairie is using a Lease / Purchase program to open a new ice arena for their community. The main Purpose of this study was to obtain information on what Items have been purchased or what projects have been done, how much it cost the departments to purchase these items or do these projects, and where they received the funds for these expenditures. This information is hopefully stated well in the main body of the report. Hypothesis #1 was not supported because the smaller employment size departments spent more on their expenditures then did the larger employment size departments. The smaller departments spent $1,985,571.50 per three years and the larger departments spent $1,608,656.75 per three years. 12 Hypothesis #2 also was not able to be supported. There were only two departments receiving grants over the past three years. This shows that their has been a decline in grant awards in recent years. Hypothesis #3 was supported by the data collected. Sixty percent of the departments do receive monies from contractor for their parks and trails dedication. Plymouth received the most over the three year period, their figure was $1,184,200.00. 13 APPENDIX A Randy Johnson Bruce Anderson 14200 Cedar Ave. S. 8150 Barbara Ave. Apple Valley, MN 55124 Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 431-8855 457-2111 Cristofer Gears Bill Kleineck 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. 60 Emerson Ave. W. St. Louisi Park, MN 55416 West St. Paul, MN 55118 924-2541 552-4150 Bob Kojetin Bob Lambert 4801 50th St. W. 7600 Executive Drive Edina, MN 55424 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 927-8861 937-2262 Steve Michaud Bob Beirscheid 20199 Holyoke Ave. W. 2800 Arona St. Box 957 Roseville, MN 55113 Lakeville, MN 55044 628-0088 469-4431 Terry Just Eric Blank 9401 Fernbrook Ln. 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Maple Grove, MN 55369 Plymouth, MN 55447 420-4000 550-5131 - city of ecigcin (Appendix B) MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACILITY THOMAS EGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT Mayor EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4600 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 PATRICIA AWADA FAX: (612) 681-4612 FAX: (612) 681-4360 PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members August 28, 1992 THOMAS HEDGES City Admininstrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Dear As an intern for the City of Eagan, Parks and Recreation Department, I am involved with a project which needs your help. The project requires that I collect some data about Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Expenditures for the last three years (fiscal years 1990, 1991 and 1992). The purpose of this project is for me to gain a better understanding of how a Parks and Recreation Department obtains and uses their funds for capital expenditures. Eagan's Parks and Recreation is also interested in finding out how other communities obtain and use funds for their capital expenditures. I am sending you this letter now, to give you a general understanding of what I am looking for. I will be calling within the next few days to set up an appointment with you to talk about your department's capital expenditures for the years stated above. I would anticipate the interview lasting approximately 15-20 minutes. I hope my coming in to talk with you will not be a problem. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. I will be in touch with you in a few days. Sincerely, David Running Parks and Recreation Intern THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer (Appendix C) Fiscal Year 1990 Department Name and Address: Interview Number Time Date Copy Y N Person Interviewed: Definition: Capital Expenditures For the purpose of this study Capital Expenditures will be Capital Outlay for item's obtained or for work done that relates to your cities parks and recreation department at a cost of over $5,000. What were your departments Capital Expenditures for the year of 1990? (i.e. new truck added to your dept. at a cost of $15,000, replacement vehicle, play ground equipment, or utility work done to a park sight) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Where did you obtain the funding or how did you finance each item or project? (i.e. replacement vehicle > equipment revolving fund) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fiscal Year 1991 What were your departments Capital Expenditures for the year of 1991? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Where did you obtain the funding or how did you finance each item or project? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fiscal Year 1992 What were your departments Capital Expenditures for the year of 1992? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Where did you obtain the funding or how did you finance each item or project? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 What is your cities 1992 General Fund Budget? What is the size of your full time staff? Clerical Personnel Office/Programming Personnel Maintenance Personnel APPENDIX D Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Lakeville: Director, Steve Michaud Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Truck, dump body/Hoist 11,000 Certificate of Indedness 2. Groundsmaster 14,000 to 3. (1) Half ton Pickup 11,000 of 4. (2) One to Trucks 26,000 of 5. Signs and striping supplies 6,000 Trail Development Fund 6. Print public info. 24,000 7. Park Development 26,000 8. Professional Services 10,000 Park Development Fund 9. Park Development 6,000 1991 1. Paint Striper 6,000 Certificate of Indedness 2. Toro Groundsmaster 12,000 it 3. Planner Fee's 6,000 Park Development Fund 4. Engineering Fee's 27,000 5. Print public info. 25,000 6. Easements / Row 199,000 7. Mach. and Equip. 107,000 If 1992 1. Park upgrade 68,000 Park Development Fund 2. Land Acquisition 100,000 Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 6,323,000 Full time staff size = 9 1/2 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Edina: Director, Bob Kojetin Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Benched/planting & drainage 5,000 General Fund 2. Renovation, House remval 25,000 " 3. Driving range Building golf 125,000 If 4. Replace filter system pool 40,000 it 5. Renovation pool 60,000 to 6. Roof Replacement 9,000 it 7. Ice Resurfacer 50,000 it 8. Replace Carpeting 15,000 it 9. Replace heating & air cond. 15,000 to 1991 1. Curbing/backing/fencing 8,000 General Fund 2. Light tennis courts 6,000 of 3. Fencing and planting 10,000 of 4. Drinking fountain 5,000 5. Renovation, house removal 25,000 6. Dredging Ponds 45,000 7. Seal parking lots 10,000 8. Building renovation 37,000 9. Floor pavilion 73,000 10. Replace heating & A/C 30,000 1992 1. Light tennis courts 6,000 General Fund 2. Parking Lot improvements 6,000 it 3. Fencing 6,000 It 4. Play Equip. 12,000 of 5. Shelter Building 75,000 of 6. Parking lot 35,000 of 7. Seal parking lot 5,000 8. Balcony & walls in pavilion 100,000 All Three years 1. Improvements 100,000 Utility Transfer 2. 20,000 Developers Fund Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 13,817,000 Full time staff size = 49 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Roseville: Director, Bob Biersheid Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Furniture-Nature center 11,000 Cent. Pk Auxiliary 2. Lighted Signs 5,000 3. Irrigation system 18,000 Cent. Pk Foundation 4. Construction of Nature Ctr. 350,000 of 5. (3) Parks vehicles 40,000 Vehicle replace Fund 6. Land Purchase 10,000 Park Land Fund 7. Play Equipment (3) 45,000 General Fund 8. Park Development 30,000 1991 1. Park Imp. 250,000 Park Imp. Fund 2. Activity Ctr Purchase/Imp. 1,149,000 Econ Retention Fund 3. (2) Trucks 59,000 Vehicle replace Fund 4. Nature Center Imp. 25,000 Cent. Pk Foundation 1992 1. Park Imp. 165,000 Park Imp. Fund 2. Tennis Cts 11,000 " 3. Play area 18,000 of 4. Trails 6,000 of 5. Trail 91,000 56,000 Cent Pk Foundation 35,000 Outdoor Rec Grant 6. Parking Lot 28,000 Cent Pk Foundation 7 Park play area 55,000 30,000 of 25,000 Comm Dev. Block On 8. Fountain 9,000 Cent Pk Auxiliary 9. Recreation Van 18,000 Vehicle Replace Fund 10. Motor Grader 33,000 of 11. Sweeper 6,000 Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 19,226,000 Full time staff size = 19 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Inver Grove Heights: Director, Bruce Anderson Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Park Acq. / Dev. 146,000 Park Aoq & Dev Fund 2. River Park 129,000 of 3. Park Acq. / Dev. 158,000 of 4. Truck 14,000 General Fund 1991 1. Open Space Study (plans) 650,000 (started in 1988) Park Acq. & Dev Fund 2. Groundsmaster 9,000 General Fund 3. Golf Course 2,200,000 Land Fill Abaitment Fund 1992 1. Golf Course 2,200,000 Land Fill Abaitment Fund Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 5,100,000 Full time staff size = 15 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) St. Louis Park: Director, Cristofer Gears Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Total years expenditures 100,000 Park and Rec. Fund 2. 11,000 Rec Center 3. of 49,000 Municipal build.Fund 4. 255,000 Park Imp. Fund 1991 1. Total years expenditures 29,000 Park and Rec Fund 2. " 5,000 Rec Center 3. 56,000 Municipal Build.Fund 4. of 126,000 Park Imp. Fund 1992 1. Total years expenditures 30,000 Park and Rec Fund 2 5,000 Rec Center 3. 130,000 Municipal build.Fund 4. 199,000 Park Imp. Fund Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 15,000,000 Full time staff size = 28 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Apple Valley: Director, Randy Johnson Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Toro Workmaster (replacement) 6,000 General Fund 2. Tractor with leader & turf tires 15,000 3. Toro Mower (replacement) 8,000 4. John Deere mower (replacement) 8,000 5. Trash truck (replacement) 11,000 6. 4x4 Truck w/ plow 10,000 7. Recreation Dept. Van 17,000 8. Trail connection 10,000 Park Dedication Fund 9. Park Imp. 15,000 it 10. Play Equip. 24,000 11. Grass seed 6,000 1991 1. John Deere 72 in. mower 8,000 General Fund 2. Erasion problem (park) 15,000 Park Dedication Fund 3 Play Equip. 15,000 4. Upgrade play equipment 12,000 5. (2) Trails 13,000 6. Play field Imp. 10,000 7. Valleywood Pro shop relocation 25,000 1992 1. Overseeding 6,000 General Fund 2. Rock Picker 7,000 it 3. John Deere 72 in. mower 22,000 4. Playscapes 45,000 Park Dedication Fund 5. Park Trees 5,000 " 6. (2) Trails 13,000 if 7. Park Imp. 5,000 it 8. Seed / Sod 7,000 " Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 9,414,000 Full time staff size = 26 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Maple Grove: Director, Terry Just Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. (2) 72 in. Groundsmasters 23,000 General Fund 2. Trailer for Groundsmasters 5,000 " 3. One ton pickup 11,000 of 4. Slit seeder 5,000 of 5. Bleachers 26,000 Park Dedication Fund 6. Play Equip. 41,000 to 7. Parking lots and roads 128,000 8. Trails 35,000 of 9. Grading Imp. 7,000 10. Trail Development 45,000 CIP 11. Play Equip. 13,000 to 12. Park Imp. 125,000 of 1991 1. Garbage Compactor / Truck 20,000 General Fund 2. Play Equip. 39,000 Park Dedication Fund 3. Trails 7,000 4. Erasion Control (play site) 17,000 5. Bleachers 13,000 it 6. Play Equip. 13,000 CIP 7. Purchase/site grading/park 200,000 1992 1. Mower Toro 580D 52,000 Equip. Replace. Fund 2. Boardwalk 23,000 Park Dedication Fund 3. Land Acq. 80,000 " 4. Put into savings (park Imp) 40,000 of 5. Land Acq. 80,000 CIP 6. Parking Lot 15,000 7. Boardwalk 88,000 8. Park Development 150,000 9. Trails 180,000 Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 9,700,000 Full time staff size = 19 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Plymouth: Director, Eric Blank Item / Project Amount $ Fund./ Source 1990 1. Land Acq. 75,000 Park Dedication Fund 2. Trails 33,000 of 3. Ball fields upgrade 10,000 of 4. Trails 233,000 of 5. Park Imp. 160,000 it 1991 1. (3) Community play fields 300,000 Inferstructur Replacement Fund 2. (3) Park Dev. 291,000 Park Dedication Fund 3. (6) Trails 275,000 " 1992 1. Irrigation 12,000 Park Dedication Fund 2. (2) Bridges (replacements) 22,000 of 3. Trails 12,000 if 4. Land Acq. 73,000 Total general fund budget for 1992 = $11,124,000 Full time staff size = 18 10. Parking lot lights 13,000 General Fund 11. Bleachers 5,000 12. Park Imp. 10,000 13. Ice Arena 2,300,000 Lease Purchase (Revenues will pay off lease) Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 16,500,000 Full time staff size = 30 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) Eden Prairie: Director, Bob Lambert Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Trails 50,000 General Fund 2. (1) Pickup 11,000 of 3. (2) Groundsmasters 20,000 4. (1) Cushman 10,000 it 5. Picnic tables 7,000 6. Mower attachments 7,000. 7. Sweeper 9,000 8. Softball field fences 8,000 9. Park shelter Imp. 30,000 10. Fences / backstops 15,000 11. Park Acq. 448,000 Park Imp. Fund 12. Consultants Fee's 8,000 " 13. Art and Appraisals 8,000 it 14. Tennis Ct. / Play Equip. 49,000 it 15. Parking Lot 14,000 it 16. Park Acq. 675,000 1991 1. Picnic tables 7,000 General Fund 2. Irrigation 16,000 it 3. Marina Floats 6,000 of 4. (2) 4x4 Trucks w/ plows 33,000 of 5. (3) Half ton pickups 23,000 of 6. Park Acq. 14,000 Park Imp. Fund 7. Park Imp. 28,000 It 8. Comm. ctr. design and Imp. 14,000 it 9. Lake Park 87,000 LAWCON 10. Trails 7,000 Park Imp. Fund 1992 1. Land Purchase 184,000 General Fund 2. Trails 30,000 It 3. Storage Bldg. 47,000 of 4. Park drainage 30,000 of 5. Groundsmaster 12,000 It 6. 4 wheel drive tractor 50,000 it 7. Loader 19,000 It 8. Irrigation system 20,000 of 9. Softball Fencing 15,000 Information Sheets (All dollar amounts have been rounded) West St. Paul: Director, Bill Kleineck Item / Project Amount $ Fund / Source 1990 1. Mini Van 12,000 Capital Note 1991 1. Half ton pickup 14,000 Capital Note 2. 16 in. cut rotary mower 48,000 3. Mowing / Snow blowing equip. 15,000 4. Parks Improvements 45,000 Public Works Reserve 5. Parks Improvements 85,000 Interest Income Fund (overpayment of sewer tax. Use Interest for park Imp.) 6. Park land Acq. 34,000 Public Works Reserve 1992 1. Parks Improvements 45,000 Public Works Reserve 2. Parks Improvements 85,000 Interest Income Fund Total general fund budget for 1992 = $ 8,725,000 Full time staff size = 8 (lowest total) SUBIECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: LEO MOGOL LOCATION: NE QUARTER OF SECTION 19 STING ZONING: COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER (CSC) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22,1992 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 149 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMP req nesting a Waiver of ON SUMMARY: An application has been arcel currently econtaining two single APPLICATION Sho in Center zoned p o erty is identified as P.I.D: # 10-01900-040-12 and is located plat for a 1.7 acre Community P family homes. The unplatte pr at 3980 Beau D'Rue Drive. Shopping Center with the CKGROUND: The property question is zoned Communit iperty has been zoned CSC BA rehensive Guide Plan. The P hensive Guide Plan in same designation in the Comp since at least 1978 and designated CSC since rooadmately 30 years and are legally existing 1980. The single family homes were built app uses. No development will occur as a result of this Waiver of Plat. non-conforming commercial COMMENTS: The residential land use is neither consistent witeh Landd Useg Guide Plan. zoning or commercial designation in the City s Compr The applicant is zoning use of tification for each atarcel so However, this will not be the final develoap a a ntax iden meets proposing a Waiver of Plat to create splits the property in a way th the homes can be sold separately. The site plan will still be used. Single Family Code requirements, but a shared driveway GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed development does not plan to perform any grading. The drainage from the site flows in a northerly direction to Beau D'Rue Drive. The existing storm sewer on Beau D'Rue Drive drains to the culvert and open-channel system on Cedarvale Boulevard that flows to the Minnesota River. WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND PROTECTION: This 1.7 acre single family residential parcel is located in Drainage Basin A. Staff will recommend that the parcel be- subject to a cash dedication to satisfy water quality requirements. The fee is estimated at $ 1,120.00. There are no wetland protection issues associated with this site. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory. Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: No utility layout was submitted by this development. According to City records, one of the two houses is hooked-up to City sewer and water service. An existing 9" sanitary sewer and 6" CIP water main is readily available to serve this site from Beau D'Rue Drive. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access for the proposed development has been provided to the site from Beau D'Rue Drive. The two existing houses currently have a shared driveway that serves both houses. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: If a sewer and water service for one parcel crosses the other parcel, then the platting of the property into two parcels will require a private utility easement to be prepared. (J FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • 19•W-8-8-92 Waiver of Plat Leo Mogol FI 10-01900040-12 financial obligations collected in the past and the Uses proposed the Based upon the study of the The charges are computed using for the property, the following charges are proposed. ility of the Gigs Ci s existing fee schedule and connections based on the connection/availab utilities. Rate Quantity Amount Improvement Use Si, /AC 1.54 Ac $2,412 Water Trunk C/I C/I 2,470/Ac 1.54 Ac 3,807 Water Availability Charge 6,060 252$/ff 240 if Lateral Benefit C/I Water 17.70/ff '240 if 4'248 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer 34,137 S.F. 2,355 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .069/S.F. • Ste. 67,137 S.F. "50 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I .035/ Total above cum utation of the financial obligation is based on the zoning of the parcel. . The P The financial obligation for single family use is: Water Trunk S .F. 51,565/Ac 1.54 Ac $ 2,412 1530/ff 240 if 3,672 Lateral Benefit S.F. Water Lateral Benefit S.F. 17.70/ff 240 if 4,248 Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .069/S.F. 34,137 S.F. . • s1.? 687 Total Neither of the proposed residences are presently connected to the City's water and sanitary sewer system, however the utilities are available. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to the following: 1. Recording within 60 days of Council- action and documentation provided to the City. Z. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 3. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 4. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 5. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. pA MAN Oft cAl tale! ''~•.}•~',•:1r'7':p~~~~~:.; W T_~~~R fir. .f•i«U.. h) i •V' ? 1M'w•N't t~f''~ FINANCIAL OBLIGATION C /r Z 0,7 I r{ G LEGEND NEON Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit Water Water Trunk Water Availability Charge Storm Sewer Trunk / Storm Sewer Trunk 1Jv. . r p4S. yb J ~ C' w•awwn~.warw. . C war wan w . w.wr FINANCIAL OBLIGATION _S l i e FQ ( U~c LEGEND "M M Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit Water Water Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk /'A(~ j# "IN cp-i "yell 790.7 ,A A- b\ wJ r.i` '~-806.0+ . '7973 PAI I` z IT1 '1 II A-11 SILVER ; t I a oiT^ 17 1?~ •j B AP+38 ' ~ti e4ei, .2ND A-n 4y2 39 ` ti A-~AIL fi. ' A.' i'lLAS• B4/.4 .gym' 6g~` r _ 703.6. •.•1i ..~~,~e~'- • KIN DI p ~Y+:~,~ c• 1~~ • T A LENIi N I j t a.a?m = - Ail- 3 ~ C L/ "•.•'~`c J~A rr ODE ~trrr'LL ~i~T~ Clot 9 aG?4AV N a` 11, 1 s F 9 A,~ Ir~J `~N • .C IRK r ~r, \ )k: X eel P1.[ Id1J ' 1 -,,.-u~ ~ eon 5 i ;tN~! I~I I ? - ,2:_' 10 1, ]~~'I Lip' t IT A, , ~7d, nlBJ' .A,e~c LA 3#J/ .iIL.~,.,.~~tf A VAKP; 1?GAN APl A `.41 0~7 JN TH 886.3 l1 i/ I 10 ,?y~ 1Ct1~- WE 890.6 =T 1- • i .1..111 - rr]'\:~ { r 20. P'. E I B l3 11 acne a AP-35 49J.4 2 :5 • ! a.. M 880.6 A T1,1111 A-a DT T "4u~ I Or .AP-511' Juk,wn .1 te69. { B f! I :~L;~.f hAP ~7•~ e~ v, S. 7, ' if 1 rI. 99. , , 0 I 1. ,93.9 ~ nr~.jir 190 PA' 1 Tit FIGURE No. 17 . STORM SEWER. LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN 1? Si :V.. fal 00 SE at. J~l LCATION f 1w Midi mo ; ll A ~ A . Ib w . 4 It Y LA 3 a 6 of 1~' I~ ~J\ L1~` vER :EDAM ilge s ie M ~ A RA - .44 ZONING 1.01 tl t2 SFPK P • • : Vii' `J.~lrl .j END Le GUIDE PLAN csc m o a ta fps, I z KH % 1 U. a ! antra ~:z$ a te~rb~s~gra I!I!!ii ti i .tee ..$.•.~e "'.4 °.'O.°."'$ w`$bf°° x I IN 5. -1 .1 ii ;7 i-t a r ~.as~~:. ."E€=b`i..' saE.s••tr$ib. (f) $O e'~.e$M Uj rte` i w~~iu..~~~f ~w « H~•~w W O O a - .g » 4r r _ n,-~ gat.sax::gj Bey "b=i °=I~$`s ss - sis3 s€ E°ciba . -5 es:~s$~~ $ ~g~~~-~-E~: b ?.7 .o €=,~~^g b=g.8.»»^8:8l3lt8 Kt.l°: »388 t3 E.. b ° o -.eY~Ya^ x« sx-ax:$a$,#_= s I::~s:=s.. ; m ~a ~a M .a a 1 re~ 3 ir1.~Et 12 •LN - es'162 tea vs~ S \~p~ ~'tl P''P~~11 4~Yfr Itp pdo J G.e~a.•~~ -Psi I.~d l/- - _ _ - - ?J b' F1 a 41' 06. I y~ N o. ~ oily ~?'S'~'nte \n~c.f ~e s\ ~ ! T - f~ I J 3 N ~ N .fit, . Aft°~ y~~ ~jf • ~ d SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (STEVENS ADDITION) APPLICANT: TOBY STEVENS LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22,1992 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 10, IM COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of approximately 3/4 acre for one single family lot on previously-zoned single family land along Wuthering Heights Road. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this site and the entire area between the Chicago Northwestern Railroad and State Highway #13 as Industrial. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The 3/4 acre parcel is located north of Silver Bell Road along Wuthering Heights Road, south and east of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant, and west of Silver Bell Apartments. The surrounding land uses are Single Family and Industrial to the north and unplatted Single Family (R-1) to the south and west. East of this site are the Silver Bell Apartments zoned R-4. The applicant is proposing to construct a single family home on the 34,500 sq. ft. lot which is consistent with the current zoning. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication for this plat. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing gravel street which is along the west property line of this one-lot subdivision has a gradual slope to the north. The drainage from the front yard area of the proposed house shall be directed to the street. The gravel street currently does not have a public storm sewer system to handle the surface water runoff. Drainage from the lots in this area generally slopes in a northerly direction by overland flow. The future upgrading of Wuthering Heights Road will require the construction of storm sewer to drain the area. During the construction of the proposed house, the builder will be responsible for grading and restoration of the lot and providing erosion control. WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND PROTECTION: This 0.75 acre single family lot is located in Drainage Basin A. Since the site is too small to accommodate on-site ponding, staff will recommend a cash dedication in lieu of ponding. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $475.62. There are no wetlands, protection issues associated with this plat. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main service of adequate depth and capacity is readily available to serve the proposed lot. An 8" sanitary sewer line and 6" water main was constructed in Wuthering Heights Road in the early 1980's. A 4" sanitary sewer and 1" water service was provided to the lot when the sewer and water in the street was constructed. There is a hydrant in the northeast corner and a hydrant in the southwest comer of the lot that will provide adequate fire protection for this area.. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the lot is currently available from Wuthering Heights Road, a privately maintained gravel street that runs along the west edge . of the lot. The private street connects to Silver Bell Road approximately 400 feet south of the proposed lot. RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate all right-of- way and easements necessary for Wuthering Heights Road. Also, a 20 foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the existing 8" sanitary sewer line that runs along the south property line of the proposed lot. The existing 8" line shall be field located and the 20 foot easement shall be centered over the lot. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • Stevens Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed "'for "the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer S.F. $.068/sq ft 34,500 sq ft x.346 Trunk S2 CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR STEVENS ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B3, C1, C2, C5, D1, El, F1, G1, and Hl 2. Development on this plat shall be consistent with all R-1 setbacks and maximum lot coverage regulations. 3. All applicable City Codes and requirements shall be adhered to. 4. A 20 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated over the center of the existing 8" sanitary sewer line that is located along the south property line of the site. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Oblications 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's' report in * accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 2. Easements and Riahts-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, pending, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as. required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.- 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and. sediment control plan must be prepared'in accordance with current city standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required •right-of-way in accordance with city code and engineering standards. D. Public Tmorovements 2. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. Z. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency., F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. C. Water Duality Dedication 2. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with.the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. 1. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be .adhered to unless specifically granted a variance. by Council action. advisory Plaaaiaq Comaission city Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.eoa - LTS 02 SE STREET MAP R ~,c, JJ 1~g iLVE E Q SiLV NO M f N w~~? ra. INDUS IAL ZONING MAP LI L• R-4 GAN MI IND TT COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP IND ,P1 DELMAn H. SCHWANZ uwa nw•e.e.v .:e IITSO SOUTH NORFRT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA SSON s17l4r117// SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE rvriiminavy rlnt: STF.VF.R. NTfTT1ON r>tener-Tlevrlojvr: Nnnry and Toby SMv.ns Rr•le: 1 Inch SO feet rsenrr ipt ion: A11 Ihnt part or Gnispinment lost 7, Srct,nn 1R, Township 27. Rangy 23 described as fotlovn, Ceww•nring at • paint 551.0 feet Last and 212.15 feet Nntth of the southe.eat earner of r'+,vern,snt lost 7, WMrtion 10, Tranship 27. Rsng? 21j tlrrr.-e Rant and pwrwllel to the south line of said ravornw•nt lost 7 • distance of 190 feet, thence North and parallel to the test line of Paid P.nvern.ent lost 7 a distance of 321.11 feet, then" Rautlr..sterly w dist•nre nE 249.01 feet to j,:,int that is 551.0 feat Last and 111.16 feet / -V North of the Pouthm.st earns thereof. thence .i:• U South and parallel to the v.nt tinp of Paid • r-w,v.r,a.ent tact 7 a dintanre of 161.10 feet to t::1::01 ::'::uinre a feet ? ~~Y ' h •~~~~''a~: lost 1 71,500 equars feet f ....::•::•.:1~:.•::' Street 11.1110 square trot f / ~I'jpt%'' { a 1 X. Fsi..tinq V.nninq N 1 0ingio family reni.lrntial y rrrpo."A Laninq Same d { Notre: Area in nrrvrd by City sanitary r " ' eew•r and rater with Prrviea .r:: :•:+s~ 7: ~~/1~i provided for this lot. 7? Pon•l is n/rrrntly an .anement road nJ and hips a gravel surfar.. :.:::...ti':: rrrjne•d hy: j,rimnr 11. Srhv:an: Land Suvvnynrs Inc. I Y 11750 South Rnhert Trail 'ej O •'S : Nasraw,nnt, NN SSORR T"1. 121-1769 NO X FINANCIAL OBLIGATION f~ % I : LEGEND "ri Storm Sewer Trunk r ~I r 4 , I~ f~ - t5ww 1W /NE rr~r~'r JoT I "aby ?lnlly Mal ln41mr1y. IWO.. M ..5.$ I" - pnP1•M by Si, a u.d1 nA .Neel w,pwaftlan Ia• MN 1 as S.vb M101.ng1d Lam. •w made, /y . IM 11a1 of ne 5111• M MMm11M1 O. . • i '1: / 0110. 07-10-92 cocoa. N. ~eh.anr ' ' I t 1Raa.aal. 111511aNIM1 Ne. Sw r r CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, (TOWN CENTRE 70 14TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: EAGAN TOWER OFFICE BUILDING PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECTION N OUTiATA9 CENTRE 70 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER (CSC) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22,1992 DATE OF REPORT:. SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Applications have been submitted requesting a Preliminary Sho in Center and a Conditional Plat for approximately three o al Community ~,~Pn a 7014th Addition. Use Permit to allow a driv LOCATION & EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently, the 3.02 acre strips vaca t. mall, located within the Eagan Town Centre development west o the f s Restaurant north of Outlot A, east along Town Centre Drive, and across from Applebee Town Centre 70 11th Addition. The entire area surrounding the parcel is zoned Community Shopping Center (CSC). 'r~ CONCERNS: The COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE, PLAN MAP & ENVIRONMENTAL rehensive Guide Plan designates this area CSC and the proposal is consistent with that Comp plan. (EAW) prepared for the Town Centre 70th The Environmental Assessment Worksheet sq. ft. of miscellaneous retail Addition (June 1986) analyzed apprca°mately 530,000 commercial/other commercial uses. Approximately 327,186 sq. ft. have been built to date. for 70 13,600 to sq. ft. retail strip center brings the total developed square footage development is roximately 340,786 sq. ft.. As such, the proposed Town The proposed EAW. within the allotted square footage analyzed in the arking spaces. 495 ISP #86-11 (September 1988) for Town Centre to dates The proposed 82 spaces Approximately 1,230 parking spaces have been developed such, the proposed would bring total parking spaces for Town Centre 70 to-1,312 spaces. number of parking spaces is within the allowed limit of the ISP. COMMENTS: It is the intention of the developer to relocate the existing strip mall tenants into this satellite strip mall designed for 1,000 sq. ft. businesses and encourage perhaps only two large tenants to fill the existing strip mall space. It has been represented that Outlot A will be developed as parking for the second phase of WalMart which is shown with one access drive along the southern property line and one along Town Centre Drive. SITE PLAN: The site plan shows a retail strip shopping mall of 13,600 sq. ft. As proposed, the mall contains ten potential store sites ranging in size from 1,000 - 2,500 sq. ft. The building is front entrance doors will face east toward the existing retail shopping center and the back of the building will face Town Centre Drive. The building design is a single-story grey brick and light grey rock face block with a metal panel sign band to match the existing retail center. One of the proposed 1,000 sq. ft. retailers in the SW comer of the building will have entrance doors on the west side and a 20' x 30' (approx.) patio outside the entrance. Also located in the rear of the building is the 144 sq. ft. maintenance and 14,438 sq. ft. trash area. This trash area shall be large enough to include recycling receptacles for the entire mall. The northernmost space in the center (2,500 sq. ft.) is the largest and has a drive-thru lane facing Town Centre Drive. A Conditional Use Permit has been applied for to allow the drive-thru. It is not known at this time who the tenant is, however the Conditional Use Permit, if approved, shall run with the land. Drive-thru stacking requirements are 100'. As depicted on the site plan, this would potentially block six parking spaces. Due to the drive- thru, a one-way circulation pattern around the north end of the building is being proposed. Two-way traffic is proposed from the Town Centre Drive access south around the building to the northernmost access on the east side of the building. Appropriate one-way signs should be located on site to encourage proper vehicular circulation. Access to this site is gained from three proposed ingress/egress points; the first along the east property line within the existing internal drive; the second from the proposed Outlot A which is also from the north/south internal drive; and third from Town Centre Drive on the west. As proposed, the access is slightly offset approximately 15' north of the existing Applebee's access point. The proposed access point should be aligned with Applebee's for obvious safety reasons. Eight two-customer parking spaces have been provided (including two handicap stalls) to serve the site. Code requires 91 parking spaces. The originally submitted site plan shows a pylon sign which would not have been consistent with the overall Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement entered into in September 1986. The developer has withdrawn his request for the pylon sign and with staff's consent, may be re- evaluating the current sign agreement and possibly revising it. The landscape plan shows a mixture of plant material, however because the back of the building will be facing Town Centre Drive, a continuous 3' berm will be required. Additional overstory trees shall be required along the southern and eastern property lines. PARKS & RECREATION: Staff's preliminary recommendations for the proposed plat are a cash parks and cash trails dedication. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The site is a grassy area with a wetland of 0.3 acres in the middle of the site. The grassy area around the wetland has been mowed and the wetland area contains cattails and some small trees. To prepare this site for the building and parking lot, the area will need approximately 4 feet of fill. The developer shall provide 3 foot berms along Town Centre Drive to provide screening from the parking lots. The drainage from this site will be conveyed by a privately maintained storm sewer system to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive. The existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive drains in a northeasterly direction to Pond DP-4 which is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual standards. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS PROTECTION: This proposed development is located in Drainage Basin D. Runoff from the site will discharge to a series of ponds classified as nutrient traps. which lie just north of Yankee Doodle Road. Eventually, the runoff from this site will reach LeMay Lake, a Class I lake designated to have water quality high enough to support direct contact recreation. 4A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding for this development will be recommended to satisfy water quality mitigation requirements. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $16,680 and covers only the obligation for Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed development. Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for development at a future date. A 0.3 acre inland shallow fresh marsh has been identified near the center of the proposed ."'development. The developer is currently putting together documentation to show that the marsh may be exempt from regulation under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). If the City finds the wetland is exempt, the developer will be able to fill or drain the - wetland without being subject to regulation under the WCA. If it does not fall under an exemption, the developer will need to avoid or minimize impacts to the wetland and/or replace impacted areas of the wetland, which in turn could affect the way the parcel can be developed. A report on these issues from the developer is due to the City on September 16. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth, size and capacity is readily available to serve this lot from an existing 8" line on Town Centre Drive. An existing 6" sewer service has been stubbed to the middle of this lot from-Town Centre Drive. The preliminary utility layout plan shows extending the sewer service to the proposed building. The City will require that a manhole be added on the sewer service at the edge of the easement to allow City Maintenance crews to inspect the sewer service. Water main of sufficient pressure, size and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 8" water main in Town Centre Drive. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the existing 8" water main in the street and constructing a 6" DIP water service to the proposed building. The proposed 6" water main would provide adequate pressure to feed the sprinkler system in the building. The existing one and one half inch capper water service that was provided to this lot in 1985 shall be removed and the corporation stop turned off at the 8" main. The existing hydrants located northwest of the lot and in the southeast corner of the lot will provide adequate fire protection to this site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access for the proposed development will be provided from Town Centre Drive which is a 48 foot face-to-face road with two lanes of traffic in each direction. Access will also be provided to this site from' a private through street that runs along the east property line of the lot. The preliminary site plan shows one access to the west onto Town Centre Drive, and two accesses to the east off of the private through street. All the driveway openings shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The centerline of the driveway on Town Centre Drive shall match the centerline of the south driveway to the proposed Applebee's restaurant. The centerline of the driveway in the southeast corner of the site shall match the driveway in front of Dougherty's restaurant. As shown on the preliminary site plan, the proposed driveway in the southeast corner of the site will be constructed in Outlot A and will be a shared driveway that will accommodate future development of Outlot A. The proposed driveway on Town Centre Drive shall contain a concrete valley gutter and concrete apron as per City of Eagan Detail Plates #440 and #445. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a'10 foot drainage and utility easement around the outside of Lot 1. 66 feet of right-of-way is currently dedicated over Town Centre Drive and no additional right-of-way is needed for the existing street. The private through streets on the north and east edge of the development will not require any right-of-way, but private cross easements will need to be provided to allow access for this lot to be used on those private streets. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, MnDept. of Health, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • Town Centre 70 Fourteenth Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate . Quantity Amount None CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR TOWN CENTRE 70 14TH • ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, C1, C2, C4, El, F1, G1, and H1 2. The site shall be irrigated. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view at each property line. 4. A large enough space shall be made available for all trash and recycling containers. 5. Continuous berming is required along Town Centre Drive. 6. Additional overstory trees shall be provided along the south and east property lines. 7. The brick building material shall be required on all four sides of the building. 8. A Variance of nine parking stalls to the required 91 shall be approved. 9. If the existing 1'/z" water service that has been provided to this lot is not utilized, then it shall be removed and the corporation stop turned off at the existing 8" water main in Town Centre Drive. 10. All three of the proposed driveway openings shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 11. The centerline of the proposed driveway in Town Centre Drive shall match the centerline of the south driveway to the proposed Applebee's Restaurant on Town Centre 70-12th Addition. 12. The proposed driveway in Town Centre Drive shall be constructed with a concrete valley gutter and concrete apron. .CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR ' DRIVE-THRU 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County with the Final Plat with documentation to the City. 3 - STANDARD CONDITIONS OF FLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Oblicatiens 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's' report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 8. Easements and Rights- of-2. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide,-or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume ` requirements. C. Flans and Boecificatiena 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3.. This development shall insure that all temporary dead o d public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-cf-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements I. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council- action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication • 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and' Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. 0. Water Quality Dedication 2. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of pending requirements in accordance with. the criteria identified In the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. N. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shail'be .adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning commission city council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: .7uly 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS 02 - rllil ,t P3?f vIF P In ,citT T Y ~K e' I I reRk'. ,p E$ 89.5 tt. _4 • AN .1 \ 89;1 /~lli -~s i1 nr Ifip PAP KT r- LEN tcI ']~LTf~ , ?tn. vv rir?' \ [ J ~ • ACK 17E xr, • bd-ifl- - ~P~ ~ ~ + t-. 135 0 no- ~ 859.E ~ E t L 1y~ t 1869'0 T a P. 11 A. A jOP ) P-1 e EP-S' bd0. r)rlp ii 33 S r ?6. SCMOf7 - 3: 4' t - vm ~8_8~0 i . lI ~a 899~Q7 -17 tt ALC 9494 . . III f ' 0 0 rear ri c ^J-O PARVB /,g t)~1~ 'I ,r - 11to~ LS-30 8 lr(ti 0 b laa r ! a E 4 J l)Alk ! E -1 07U r t 'F ,MAY r LF3N19 s~~ v EneneJ,n8g3.C 984.$s. PQ T ^ ' ~1U1• ' AT tat 890. . f fi`w4itb~ SER.0 I iL C L: ~8 P5.0 873.6 I f 855 0 842.15' " • , 88'0 539. " DP-13 582.0 D ..2t 19'" < .LLnotrTlof 65 DP-6 DP- i MCP- T 857.3 856 866,3 864 DP- JEP376.3 36. 877.2 r ~ r 87~.p6 48~ 1187~-4 L.S.-7 ° s 0-s CO. R w 2A 14 i• + DP-2 T" a 85e;3 901 f UL tt'7f IE e .[++Ti I?p T?J EO 2 90. loo ern). B62.B~ NT RC 89 Q f t 1 r TU~ATS ~ri~~1-/ ~t t. N u. 0' EA P ~tIgBB~.2 ADD.:O-w ~ ?SGE BSB$.S rr,,q cr lrrYr 1 , f btlLF /a 7F. 7n rr~.,T~ pP~K w~er, ,l_~.. I DFf]Y SE gip; g73.o lt--871:0 4 8820 r m7 wa rr w c~nrr n d._. SITE FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN KKE Kor.•n.k, Krank fth k..m Archltea.. Inc. ..1 ww M.ww. \....F r.l! . ~~~I! II NOME FHOMT L R S B of • T T E Q E S Q Q ANDY :1 11 11 11 11 TOWN CENTRE U, F1'i~ I EAGAN OUTLOT A WEST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS Noa»I ELEVwTaN yr-to• kteult maven tents `.A /AETAL PANEL"D" • • dart GREY MICWACE MAC' •ACKUT YMYL CANOPY \ y . MIEVAL FASCIA L L TIdE • IIA 1 N l SAT 1C ATd i ( i AI. 1"1 11 11 F.-J, 11 -11 11 11-:11, IV www.w. Iwew'M q w.. ~y..a1 1 r :r.. ~11JSe.tws S3.7M; I. ~J I r._.y..ti:i ~r I-~ II~ .1 Vpt / •.y MR.0 EAST ELEVATION Mow - - TVs.. M •/f1/•7 SOUTH ELEVATION t...rq - + , . Town Centre 70 14th Addition ,tr~~ IC 7N CY 4 - FOREST flit b - IRONW000 T 6- HEMOOD 1 7 - SPRLXE PT YAW, STREET MAP ST E 53T n fn. MIT t1 F ~ C NR 01EARr P. a a _RIVE l yea L A 1 R r 1 IcK R u I`I q ~ l It: ~ N 'C EuAV~ EN#LEF ~1` a5TAD1. 9 M :LIFT AN A o- sucl 11 SUAllro ZONING MAP 11. ENy "PP %lMdl HTS. ~ •y a. T ip, ..T~1' 'Y-rs71 :.R 'RROF~FSI ~ ~5~~' . R-2 t.l ,l' , i s till. L9 ! 111' ' Pr-, i PF COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP LB a fj sy / Le 0-m D-II D-1 r -1 Town Centre 70 14th Addition. `I OWN b•'1~r4 •sr~e,~+y (:INTR. 170 .9th ADD. 00-1 TOWN I Q~ a~ + 'T EVTH/ ADD. El DNTLOT ENTRE Man% V4. - LOT 1. ELEVENT T S ' hh • : ` ii g ~{s 1 s` Yf} flip L € i i il. ( _ _ •It gyp. ~ F e • deC ~~5M ~i FS t"" t ` SAC i YYiwnY(/ i y [ 2 6. 8L ~ ~ ~,1 q 1 gx; f,q•s ;•)•F7~~ _ y `'!'tb ~ ' ~ ~ . Jed z'' 1-1-~ II II Y : • ~'1 11II 1112K KKE Kor.an•kV Krank FrIC1114 I \ Archllecta, Inc. ti~ _ ;.•1x•1 \,1 nIx. 44 1 \ ~Mx•?nAn MY\\.11 1•'11• Ih.1 ~ I J 1\\ 1 :'I hi / /I~.~by {lam TOWN CENTRE \ ro APPLfARS EAGAN wh \ / OUTLOT A \ CFNTA~ ` EAGAN. MINNESOTA A04O MAINTENANCE/ PATIO, tD•.fENY1CEf UI fr TRASH 1 a aa SP t.fff fr Ifi !e• f""t"Arl"• \ SITE PLAN f1 1ff r • / fee III 11i` ` rane l?.o\w?narw 1\.w. y. K. bfM or I IS • a •mM' '1 IU aau rugn ,foes f 117 l4 vlluwlr aau 11.11 q. ! f ` 11f 41?t ! \1 rnu•u O rrula -to aef s !f• 1.fff sr- . if w+.xsl xr x1+1 w. ur..elrr •Iwa. • +1O @TION OI•N~, +s•+... _ _ _ N•NIN 6_r •/t/at Mv. rAI/L fpc to, q• ff c..wq Na r I~ IIIILM w. M11 i1 MI 1. r MI pF~. 111.1 rwt.• .1• M. - \ • • . .I IfF.F/ R •1rtRlr1.• ,.f• I•I L ti rw sr1.r .III .N •I.FII. ~.Nr• .I• w1 \ / ± RAN)eN NTAII r H' I fM r-- fW MVar •rT N111,N• III A r. JL - 11 , 11MT rfwS1 f111L 1541 I• IR S ' AIM 1 IIIr1 IYrI1 rtfy r',1 IINwI• ~ N /1• IA ` r.. M .111_ . r•I. NIFfr w« art• 11• 111 ~L ~=••~r.f. \ 11Y, II N1N,11 '.flrfl .f11I1 • .'M 11• Io1 11 rtF Iwo; MFFI.r1 'rwNF.F ' .r NI lY'IN 1111 r~ - r.---• RormNL? NnnM ?rk AL1N, .1r «i~ 1w' 1w1rr . • 1 i~ :im •w .m~•R•_ ~ Af•AIIrt IL. bq. \ I I.•' N• 111.1 1•«1x.11.1ns \•xIF • ` - J «a 4L IF••N Frw n MYtR • n pR N': 1Nxa !j `rw .I.m...1-i,".1\ t....J viwi~ F11 q, 1Fw•a r~ 1.1,11. •f wY1 y 1!- Mt \ 4 11:'•;x• . r~•F11'e 1w ~w:«nr1 1111.af:1N r . 11s ..w.« V1 ~ I.w.rN. h TOWN CENTRE o EAGAN w /'cF OUTLOT A EAGAN. MINNESOTA 040 portm K , J I r rrr.,,:r~ I ~ INTENANGE\ MTNI q Oo. 4E11Y:(E1•\ ••^i1"° \ • -44 or TRASH }Ir; • " t- am 144 ti _ , y, Lew is • . trfl . . ,,11 ,.Lb/ \ \ . LANDSCAPE PLAN /0) 17t 11 117 I u1 1 /.ew 1e • 1 ° 11t p• \ 4R1NI,fAIW .111.E K-0.° . ll.,yL .wo f w0 t .7eA a It? \ 111.«Irw Mso ff. 1 1 e• .f»e:+ 1»~ 'FE. * ~ \ urr v.Lalu urw L,Inyn - •I. to. Ir~N LL,, .900 9 • T f1•R "l-• tees or ~ ~ • _ 1 t _ T•.y/ / ~ 17 ; t /:w~ w1 1.r.wuwr .r.•'w r.n so I _I / ` i f.. ~>~s• ~0_ •Sr~r. j/j . -r ~I •J ; «.11.. • M •.?.•-.e ••e nn• ~1 1~ w. uwNw. sr..r •.••Lw• K~/(:, -•tttl w ITIeN fNIN\ • 1 ~ •1r.11DrCrR ?KrNELT 1 ~ t . r, mN b.~.L•fa••ps.. oil \ / ` , a L L „y s1 .I,Pi4 ~j ' 1.•rxFf1•:" R07TR OL do" of II.R.f.RL~w'IRD~ AIEfR'IAiti.dlC. i 1 TOWN CENTRE 14 TH ADDITION rosy • tip \ ~ ~ s 1.~ w~ v z z z PATIO 14c a,~\ J•\ \ . \ o 'O , !d• OL rL KA ELEV. 03.50 •i ; • to I 1 I ~ ,y° ' • .j~ ® r L• ? 1 t mac. SEAM a=o n• = O Vy I ~ w• le, . so ~ ' V SUBJECT: PD AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRELIMINARY PLAT (TOWN CENTRE 100 11TH) APPLICANT: EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1S EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LIMITED BUSINESS (PD-LB) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment from Planned Development-Limited Business to Planned Development-Community Shopping Center (PD-CSC), a Conditional Use Permit to allow an automobile service use, and a 6.39 acre Preliminary Plat consisting of one .58 acre lot and one 5.81 acre outlot. The entire site is presently platted as Outlot E, Town Centre 100 1st Addition. BACKGROUND: The zoning of Outlot E, Town Centre 100 1st Addition was amended to PD-CSC in April 1988 within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development. The proposed plat is located south of Yankee Doodle Road, east of O'Leary Lane, north of Town Centre Drive, and west of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield 10-story office building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 1st Addition. COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing a two-service bay Valvoline Instant Oil Change on the .58 acre Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 11th Addition. There are no current development plans for the 5.81 acre outlot. The automobile service use is not allowed in the Limited Business zoning district; however this use is a conditional use in the Community Shopping Center zoning district provided the following criteria is met: • The size, location, design, and number of stations shall be approved by the City as part of the approval of the overall design of the shopping center. The opening of any service station shall follow and not proceed the construction and occupancy of a minimum 20,000 sq. ft of retail shopping center floor space. • Direct access shall orient toward the interior of the shopping center and not directly from peripheral streets. • Rental of trailers and similar vehicles where adequate parking space is provided and as specifically approved with the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed Lot 1 is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and O'Leary Lane. A single access to the oil change site is shown off O'Leary Lane at. the south edge of the site approximately 200' south of Yankee Doodle Road. This access will ultimately extend to the west to also serve that part of the proposed Outlot A between the Valvoline site and the Blue Cross/Blue Shield office tower. The site plan calls for eight parking stalls which meets Code requirements for off-street parking. All Community "Shopping Center building and parking setbacks are satisfied. The applicant is proposing a brick building with an attached trash/recycling enclosure. The site plan shows a pylon sign on the northeast corner of the site which is consistent with the Town Centre-Eagan Pylon Sign Agreement and a monument sign on the southeast corner. The proposed monument sign is not allowed because the City Sign Code states, "When used, a pylon sign is allowed in lieu of a free-standing ground sign." All signage will be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that provides a nice combination of overstory and understory trees, as well as plantings that will provide some year-round color. An underground irrigation system is also proposed. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing terrain on this site is fairly flat with no trees. The grading required to prepare this site includes providing 3 foot berms along Yankee Doodle Road and O'Leary Lane. With the proposed building's finished floor elevation at 891.0, the grading that will be required for this site will require cuts of approximately 4 feet over the entire site. The drainage from this site will be collected by an internal proposed storm sewer system that will drain the parking lot and building to the existing storm sewer on O'Leary Lane. .The preliminary utility plan shows constructing catch basins and storm sewer that will connect to an existing 15" stub out of O'Leary Lane along the south property line. The' existing storm sewer on O'Leary Lane drains to the north and into Pond DP -5 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual standards. WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND PROTECTION: This proposed development is located in Drainage Basin D. Runoff from the site will eventually reach LeMay Lake after traveling through three nutrient basins and one stormwater basin. LeMay Lake is designated as one of six Class I lakes in the City and is intended to have water quality sufficient to support direct contact recreation. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding to satisfy water quality treatment rquirements will be recommended for this development. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $4,500 and will cover only the 0.57 acre parcel designated as Lot 1, Block 1. Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for future development at a later date. There are no wetland protection issues associated with this proposed development. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 12" sanitary sewer line along the' south side of Yankee Doodle Road. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the 12" line and constructing a sewer service up to the proposed building. The sanitary sewer service line should be designed to provide connection to the future development to the west. The sanitary sewer connection shall include a manhole at the property line to allow the City to maintain and inspect the sewer line. Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 18" water main on Yankee Doodle Road and from an existing 12" watermain on O'Leary Lane. The preliminary plan shows connecting to the 12" water main on O'Leary Lane and running the water service up to the building. The existing hydrant located in the northeast corner of the lot will provide adequate fire protection to this development. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access for the proposed development will be provided from O'Leary Lane. No access will be provided from Yankee Doodle Road. The preliminary site plan shows constructing a private street along the south property line of this development that will serve this site and the future development to the west or south of this development. City staff recommends that the private street along the south property line shall be 30 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. Also the driveway opening to the proposed development off the private street shall be a 30 foot wide opening. The development shall provide a concrete apron with a concrete valley gutter as shown on City of Eagan Detail Plates 440 and 445 at the private street connection to O'Leary Lane. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: There currently is 80 feet of public right-of- way along O'Leary Lane and 60 feet of half right-of-way along Yankee Doodle Road adjacent to this site. The final plat shall include drainage and utility easements dedicated for all sewer and water lines that will also provide service to other developments. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, MnDept. of Health, Dakota County, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Town Centre 100 11th Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed -for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Availability C/I $2,470/acre 376 acre X1,423 Charge There is a payoff balance of $76,551 remaining on the assessments that have been charged to this parcel. This payoff balance will be allocated on an area basis to the parcels created by this subdivision. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR TOWN CENTRE 100 11TH ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al,B1,B2,B3,C1,C2,C3,C4,CS,El,Fl,G1,andHI 2. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate the ground sign. 3. A trash/recycling enclosure shall be attached to the building and made of the same building materials. 4. No outside storage shall be allowed. 5. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the street level. 6. An underground irrigation system will be required for all landscaped and sodded areas. 7. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. and Code requirements. 8. Three foot berming shall be required along all public street areas. 9. The development shall provide a concrete apron with a concrete valley gutter at the private street connection to O'Leary Lane. 10. The development is required to utilize the existing water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer stubs provided to serve this area with the initial development of Town Centre 100. CONDITIONS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County along with the' Final Plat and documentation provided to the City. CONDITIONS OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into and executed with the Final Plat approval. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Yinancial•Oblicatione 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements--and Rigbts-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilitiek and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to-service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STAfDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not*be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets' shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. public Ta rovemgnts 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public bearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition .of all regulatory 'agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency... F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and. Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. 0. suer ouality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in' addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with.the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality-Management Plan. 8. Other 1. All standard platting and toning conditions shall 'be .adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission city council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 1S. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 plataprv.eoa _ - LTS #2 PROPOSED PLAT Eo «E.o.e+~e»: / ~ .flObLC,W.•_•--_~ -OMMiC MTNpGTpN.1 w.r frwr f.Yr ? r~ , y4r • ` .fir w.r , I 1 1, ' • - 1--i F--t - I•-~-? C - - lot • L ~ = r- ~lfM if f~t..f ~ ' -r. I • - C=l --am so- E p. I uw.rsrsEl • / E¦¦- ¦Hw. , - L-'-11 '~9 k I ' i as rows ~~.r ' _ ® - --Y=;mf=~ 00 i000000 ~o»paooo BOB A AL Ewmw ~Sc WMALED ,"Jo '."a , ' : ' L1.- ~~-7 • ff.¦ - .rfr m......fa . rw Onlr qa-¦.rt •rrwr .frr ff-•.•-usw.fE afw ~•1 - W .u- r~w• ~r+•r r Q t] Z tT vM . Kn»i.rn ~f_ [rfr 40 _ EAGAN TOWN CENTRE ~ L 'I ...¦ae~ r.wwr II Cl*&cs rPJW 170 ACRE RETAIL COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMEW . , T R • ¦ DEVELOPER FEDERAL LAND C U M . • f ~ G ; j EXHIBIT "1" KE LE A =•4+-r co EDNA 2 . s~oNAl BANK CSC USE 5. LA 9:.6 ACRES GENERAL BUSINESS O Z I -A (i motel) ncluding htgh H se USE G LB USE underlying zone so cc Y csc VIE ~rJ U a_ CSC USE 4.. 5a. CSC USE 5.4 ACRES LIMITED \ R-4 7.98 ACRES (including high rise gen. BUSINESS office tower or corp. hdgt 6.4 ACRES underlying zoning "csc" 0 am. Bb_ LIMITED E 'F SIM BUSINESS ' Paw %W-Wa I IM USE 7. 6. R-4 8.12 ACRES LIMITED BUSINESS USE 8.59 ACRES underlying zone "LB" 10.5 ACRES (including high rise 1. Pam office tower) 0jZW PAM PROPOSED SKETCH PLAN. EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERICAL PARK ccewwr A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY THE FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATED IN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 4 a s ..s 4 till 22 all His i221 1• . °t :1 syE= ]si s = i e : =rF3- i.l3 ~s L }iifi' sis !t!'ft!!i-!t! i I 1 IM "s jl I $.3ized ~ A* 3-1.0 1 I/ f i t' 1) i 1 j' r~ 1 f 1 i 1 f j i % J Js • •`>1Nt1 .l ,y ~~--'r~ 11 ~ /iii,/~ ~ ~p~ i S al Y~ `T~i,l ~ • i i f 'Ili~~ iif~jlj~' I ~ 1 / / 1' I I l 1. 1, Wt\ 01 f 11 ,1\ \ ';1'll : t ~ ./BSI 1 \ \ \ \ it, s ` 1 1 ! j i i~ Mew N ~y~~ia' u! ~,~~-r R. t M, P, / - VALVOL1NE AOt0CI A , INSTANTOIL INt. CHANGE . If r YANKEE DOODLE ROAD +m. 'r WA'I' VALVOL.NE INSTANT OL CHANGE EAGAN. MN.. sm"m r ' I • " J I • SITE DATA Mao _ .rtra:qy1 " .w.r ww+v. s ~rw AA - _ ti.ny~l.e...r~r wrrar..ae.wr r~lYr rM •w~r lMlt-w~ ~fr..r f)a~r,/ .r . .~r•f~ r/w M .w.wr• r~~r i ' ~Fa~.wR\ ~ Ywwy..~RY. 1 _ I mmmmx~ 4j.1. u' ....~.........I~I...Iw.. PBEPARD - wr~Rw rr Wwti. FOR FEDERAL v - ~ LAND CO, we* I 4A _2R I _Rr.~.la i \e r. r ••q•~i SITE, GRADING & UTILITY PLAN I "=2Q' NOW" r r, nil D. R.GRISNOLD & ASSOCIATES .nu r nn ~y YANKEE DOODLE ROAD .:CONSULTANTS • r i - wan wwawc ~ ~ w ru.«M aw« •.r. w.., Imo`. ' , M VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL • n. r ;..«.r r. CHANGE ia« 1, M O-w"aMiiM»I~i4; ~~Wa:• w r w.«JS. ~rx.w•r, ~ ~nr uM •i.• ,•aran«.~Np • w • iw..yx''.'warn.. a '•i..v.• wr • • ,swan. n• r _Y ~ W,eru. Ir au w.rrr~. a."..s:'u«..rr.w.. r• urr.. Ww.:i Z I«t4 Ipal r..•«I M. u.:r«r 1 M.pn• rn .al, • aJ.. ww W.nw.... rw«nJ11rr.. r.p MJ. rya! BUILDING g 11 Iflll4% M4 M.1wfl.w pryr: .J.Mgnn1 YA, nN r1p .•4 rrN M'tU r«MM.IA,rrw. 1 W • ` aaile,awaa,a ~ ..aNr I....a..w.. PLAlnwo MAIL i• ? - r AMR _L~ 711tE rtls w,~ ' - sari v,,_w LANDSCAPE p PLAN r maser 1 or 1 l r r. r 1 RECr, - a92 Y:. 'wl{ Y X11 I. 11 , ' 1R mom '.ert a: i •f:~'~.,J -sue,'. Z-Z } { fe fjElI E e '~~Z_~ I IjP l! I 3 i I =3 it x; s-- i t U {s d 3 Z a a .J i= i f s=_ O F- j =.1 i= ! _ t Q 1i •3 I; a i 0 : 'il k I I_ O W = E t s iali I ! / _ ii hits t • =i ; Is = ;s Q O W its Z ii SIR iIi iii 1 I I 1 s z l i i fill Ii= Pis ti:ssi'.f ilhh. 69 AoVa-1.o f~l - ~ZYS ~t~r2 - , i+ / Il _ ?11 ! 1\2J i11 i it lot $e sY.; •.v.•: • . ~ 1 i , 1 f 1(/ 1 1,11 , / , O 1 ~f+~ W~••'~•~` i~ $ i ~ ~~~Ili~~l~i~~iii'' i f l ~ Y 1'r1; i , ' , , I II j•1 % 1;1!1;1; L 1 ; 1 ! / -I all ~ ~ ; if f , r;11 1+1,, ; 1 j 1 ~ _ I ~..:•-i 1 , , , 11 = , 111 , ? , 0 H1 o II'=./ a ~..._.M w.W J .i;' ~~•-^.ytY!~ ?y . it l; : ' - • ~ I u it . I NEW TN VIES C~l K )lIll.lllus ~.t~ A C Et • T Y- egg~~ t tom- / r AN I TCR 9~t 1311IT11I f -Q n IND PAR I.Ex 46. tic 5 - - - / Cta12'~ 9 ANDA E8>-` D' •I}r }-I ^ 0 • _ i L-- a6 .10 NO; .2 tl-n .0 +I 64.0 a..~ _ 8 7I Ett E I~' L F. )k'& I E1O • 8.0 C1J-:O 6. I "pr PARre LS.-30 ea IUntE InM c rncnN,.E -11 1- J MAY. Y LbFlN 5 3.C W 3 T; 890. . S. PQ ^ T e ^ 6. •L SER D P 4 13 5 0 873.6 655.0 82-7 k.-V 842.6 r 8l DP-13 682.0 h D 27 D 884.s y e .S '____6 6. 864 DP-- P-3ti 838.3 876.3 855. r D.P- Z6 I DP- 4 48 r ~ 876. ry ~1_~ h r' a ~'u~7,B.3 .r•.:_ LJB'2 CO. ° 3 0-= NCO. R 02 Al P'13tk 1QbOP-858^ 862t C7~)1!f_u1R 89.0'r 139 STI4 f 1 t., ~f 9c ^..rt+ ~rrE~~ 99f.6 0' EA I ST N{ 88'~ D•w ...~.A l gGE tp --I c` .-r? ftr1R, 10C trVLF Ttw t, ~J cFl1N 7n sl'ST1 f1Pg+ O, ` ~ WoM) a-_.._,y D~Yff~E t^ % "~slx 7tir(~`I - ~8p eez: 1 ?`/'1n~.J'1.°'1ircre~~r.rr n ~r~~~r~~.'d_.. ~~1 1~"1 `1 ~'~II, l\ SITE FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT,- PRELIMINARY PLAT (WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY LOCATION: SE QUARTER SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (LI-PD) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22,1992 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 10,1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of approximately 2.2 Light Industrial acres to a Planned Development district and a Planned Development Amendment to incorporate this area into the 260-acre West Publishing P.D. created in 1990. The Preliminary Plat consists of one 4.7 acre lot. This plat includes a 2.2 acre parcel that West Publishing previously owned that contained, until recently, a single family residence and the 2.5 acre Lembke addition. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area Industrial, therefore no amendment is necessary. In July a public hearing was held to allow grading on the unp]atted property. There is a substantial amount of dirt that will be transported across Highway 149 to the approved YMCA site. The grading will create a building pad for future warehouse expansion. Berming and landscaping consistent with what is currently along Wescott Road will be provided for overall continuity. 1. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: On August 4, 1992, the City Council approved a grading/excavation permit to West Publishing Company to prepare this site for { future development. As shown on the grading, drainage and erosion control plan submitted by the applicant, the developer proposes a maximum cut of 46 feet and a maximum fill of four feet. There is a substantial amount of material that will be transported off the site to the recently approved YMCA site. Berming and landscaping consistent with what is currently along Wescott Road will be provided for overall continuity. The developer will be responsible for abandoning 'the existing wells and septic systems on the site proposed to be graded in accordance with City and County requirements. The drainage from the development is proposed to be conveyed by private storm sewer lines to Pond GP-4, which is a pond included on the City's Stormwater Management Plan. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS PROTECTION: This development is located in Drainage G. Runoff from the site will eventually reach Bur Oak Pond (Pond GP-1) after traveling through several intervening stormwater basins. Bur Oak Pond is classified as a 'Class U indirect contact recreation water body and is the highest valued lake in the drainage. While there is some opportunity for creating wet pond volume to remove pollutants in Pond GP-4 located on property owned by West Publishing, deepening a nutrient detention basin just south of Bur Oak Pond is a more effective means of protecting water quality in this Class II water body. As such, this development will be subject to a cash dedication in lieu of ponding to meet its water quality treatment obligation. The cash dedication would be used to help finance this improvement. Based on the total project area of 4.7 acres and assuming an impervious surface coverage of 75% for the proposed industrial land use, the amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $22,120. The final figure would be based on the actual impervious coverage when those figures are available. The developer's representative has stated that the site will contain no impervious surface in the immediate future. However, the land will still be zoned to allow light industrial uses and will be used for that purpose at some time in the future. As such, he has requested that the plat approval be conditioned to allow a consideration of water quality-related requirements when a building permit is requested to authorize those improvements. Since this is a departure from the water quality ordinance, the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission will review and forward. their recommendation to the Council on this issue. There are no wetlands protection issues associated with this proposed development. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain service is readily available to serve this site. The developer intends to provide sanitary sewer service by connecting to an existing 8" line located along the west edge of Pond GP-4 and extending an 8" sewer-%o the area to be platted. Watermain service will be provided by connecting to the existing private watermain system that loops around the existing buildings of West Publishing. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the site is available from Wescott Road, which is along the south property line of the site. No street connections are proposed onto Wescott Road along this plat. Future development on this site will utilize the existing driveways that serve the West Publishing development. This development shall remove the existing driveway openings along 'thus plat's south property line and restore the street and trail along Wescott Road at the driveway openings. EASEMENTS/RIGHT•OF-WAY/PERMITS: The final plat shall include a 10 foot drainage and utility easement along the Wescott Road right-of-way: Also, the final plat shall include a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - West Publishing 6th Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer C/I $.104/S.F. 204,500 S.F. $21,268 Trunk Lateral Benefit C/I =2525/ff 425 if 10,731 Water Trunk Total s3 There are levied assessments totaling $3,865 which will be repread to the newly created lots. $15,509 of the financial obligation is related to charges for the Lembke Addition parcel that is to be incorporated into West Publishing 6th. West Publishing has requested that collection of these charges be deferred until a building permit is -requested for this plat CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B3, Cl, C2, C4, E1, F1, 01, and H1 2. The final plat shall include a 10 foot drainage and utility easement along the Wescott Road right-of-way. 3. The final plat shall include a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road. 4. This development shall remove the existing driveways along Wescott Road along the south property line of this plat. 5. The developer will be responsible for abandoning the existing wells and septic systems on this site in accordance with City and County requirements. •aM.+.+~ WWAPATID1ds OF PLAT 1PPROPAL 1~• ,r,nc;ai obiiaatien: 1. This development shall accept Its additional financial obligations as defined __1n the staff's report In accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval- luezents and - 2. This development shall dedicate 10'.drainege and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public sight-of-gray. 2. This development shall dedicate, +provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility iasem*nts as -required by the,- alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public sight-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right.of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to Incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by city storm water storage volume requirements. C. plans and specifications i. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, irosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end* public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed In accordance with City engineering standards. STA?:DARD CONDITIONS OF PI AT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed gqrading plan. The financial guarantee shall be Included in the Development Contract and riot be released until one year after the date of Installation. S. All internal public and private. streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with city Code and engineering standards. D. Public Tmerevemeets i. If any public Improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public bearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. Z. pe~smits 1.. This development shall,)e responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency. permits in the time frame required by the affected agency... F. Parks and Trails badieaticn 3. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements' as recommended by the Advisory Parks and • Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. 0. sater Ouality tedieatiea This development shall be responsible for providing.a cash dedication in' addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance pith the-criteria Identified In the City's Water -Quality lianagemant Plan. Z. other 1. All standard platting and'soning conditions shall be .adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. . advisory Plamaiag Qeasissies City Oouseii approved: ,August 25. 1997 -Beotember 35. 1987 Revised: ~1uly lo. 1990"""`... ' plataprv.eom ITS #2 js 1W0~ ' ~ ~a~ ~aua8 Fyn - ON3O31 NOLLVaf8O 1VI3NVNIA R Z9 JNIH32Z8l a yS31y Gnaw ins ice' 1 -Ml LJa$t Pub ~ ~sh,.,9 N rlq'~tl 4O rr 7t)atui bl 0 C • I 225.O') wrsr A Lo ti S~~NG ppN n e v ~GS~ poQ PN G ry r ttw. f ASr11rNr Nf11 of- NAR4914OO • 490419 c.!T 225 00 if /4 Preliminary Plat WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 6TH ADDITION e 4X 00 •YY~ U. ~ysf ~~Y 1 i ~i 91 40, 001, ` \ / ! iiiif:iii itii 4ilili i'i -?+-t 4~;;- / a•:./// ` ~!lIOTTTTT ITlf:a E=!R"'Ti1S \ •L~ i~// /i'(//' / K IA1 Ih 1 N y p' i .Y' t Ati+ ti s Au j a 11 ,1 ,1 ~ 1 y i ~ _ / 1! _ . _ . _ . _-_e _ - . ._i>`~irisN-i+ff@4'-as?tii~~:•~ - 1 •I Cl 1' A I' s:{•flF?FI±F •:y .t .I 1 ~ X111 ® 1 1 ~ •1 t~ :~:~I~i::: A.y 1. All I 1 . r • 1 ll Is 1 A.. y >F 4,1 • 1 A i - 1 1 J 1 -r- - 1: r A 1 1 LV 1 ly , 1 9c>? 1 j _ I I ~S 1 I 0 ° 11 1 4 A h l~e~~ts:atssr>•~sr' I r 1 ? Y \ 1 S h s~l~rlrrr*r.ll~re~ t_ d a aiiJi-iwa[if-1j-4ii ii.i iilfl.i 4 i a b.+~- • 1, 7 1 Y ~ r y y • IAft ~ y / \ d PA ` - Y .d .:elf a w~?~~r•~sa . L \ • 1• - ) u f~ 1 I i /r 1A~71. 11 % err IKt~wFiiiw,. •1 AIN 1. REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL EAGAN, MINNESOTA 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS: Ron Voracek - Chairman, Scott Merkley - Vice-Chairman, John Griggs - Secretary, Gary Graves, Mark Miller, John Gorman, Donald Hoeft, Shawn Hunter (Alternate) Old Business and Items. A, B, and C will appear on the Tuesday, October 6, 1992 City Council agenda and the remaining items will appear on the Tuesday, October 20, 1992 City Council agenda unless otherwise noted or continued by the Advisory Planning Commission. 1. 7:00 P.M. - Roll call and Pledge of Allegiance II. 7:05 P.M. - Adopt agenda and approve minutes M. OLD BUSINESS A. WENZEL ADDITION - WENSMANN REALTY A Rezoning of approximately 40 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PD (Planned Development) district allowing a mixture of residential uses and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 181 units located along the north side of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 21. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION - WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY A Rezoning of approximately 2.2 LI (Light Industrial) acres to a PD (Planned Development) district, a Planned Development Amendment incorporating the area into the West Publishing Planned Development, and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 4.7 acres located on the north side of Wescott Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 13. B. WAIVER OF PLAT - LEO MOGEL A Waiver of Plat in order to split Parcel 040-12 for individual ownership located on the SE side of Beau D'Rue Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 19. C. PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOBY STEVENS A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately one acre of previously-zoned R-1 (Single Family) land located on the SE side of Wuthering Heights Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 18. D. TOWN CTR 70 14TH ADD. - EAGAN TOWER OFC BLDG PTNRSHP A Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 3 previously-zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres, Conditional Use Permits for a drive- thru facility, and a pylon sign located along the east side of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. E TOWN CTR 100 11TH ADD. - EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK A Planned Development Amendment changing the land use within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development from LB (Limited Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) for approximately 6.4 acres, a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and an Outlot, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow an automobile service station in a CSC district located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road west of O'Leary Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT WENZEL ADDITION APPLICANT: WENSMANN REALTY LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of approximately 40 Agricultural zoned acres to PD (Planned Development) and a Preliminary Plat of 181 units located north of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 21. BACKGROUND: Approximately two months ago Mr. Herb Wensmann of Wensmann Realty submitted plans for a Preliminary Plat of Mixed Residential uses on approximately 40 acres. The plan called for a variety of housing types: single family, duplex, townhomes, and cluster homes. After initial staff review, Mr. Wensmann lowered the number of cluster home units by 26. The project was then scheduled for the August 25, 1992 Advisory Planning Commission showing a total of 181 units on 37.9 acres, for a total density of 4.77 units/acre. At the public hearing, several residents expressed their concern with the number of units and objecting to the high density of the cluster homes on the western half of the development. It was decided to continue the item based on the following concerns of the Advisory Planning Commission: 1. Overall density of the project. 2. One access onto Diffley Road. 3. The number of children this project will bring in and the impact it will have on nearby schools. 4. The overall impact on the environment. Since then, Mr. - Wensmann has made revisions to the plan. The cluster-type houses have been removed and replaced with 40 quad units, 10 buildings in the southern half and eight townhome buildings with 36 units to the north. This results in a net loss of 38 units. Replacing the 14 duplex units are 34 single level townhome units, 9 buildings, for a net increase of 20 units east of the public north/south road and west of the pond. The single family home sites have been reduced by one lot to 17 and'the townhomes east of the existing pond have been reduced by one unit to 34 (eight buildings). The overall density for the entire site has been reduced by 20 units to 161. The density is now 4.24 from 4.77 LOCATION: The site is located north along Diffley Road (County Road 30), south of Deerwood Elementary School and the new middle school, west of Knob Hill Townhomes and Deerwood Ponds addition, and east of the Bieter Company property. The surrounding zoning districts are as follows: Public Facilities to the north, Planned Development Single Family and Townhouse to the east, Park and Planned Developments townhomes across Diffley Road to the south, and Agricultural to the west. The March 1991 Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this 40 acres as D-H, Mixed Residential, (0-6 units/acre). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently, there is one home located near the southeast corner of the property that will be removed as a result of this project. West of this home is a pond surrounded by a mixture of mature deciduous trees extending as far south as Diffley Road. West of the pond is a gently-rolling open grassy site. The existing homestead takes its access from Diffley Road. PROPOSAL: The new proposal is still a mixture of residential uses. The cluster-type housing has been replaced by quad homes which are 1,144 sq. ft. on the main floor, aluminum siding, and will be marketed at $75,000. The density for the quadrominiums is 6.5 units/acre. North of the quadrominiums is Block 2 (5.9 acres) which has ben revised from cluster homes to slab-on-grade one and two story townhomes. The single-story townhomes are approximately 1,200 sq. ft. and located on the ends of the buildings; the two- story units are located between the single story units and are approximately 1,300 sq. ft. These units are a combination of brick and aluminum siding and will be marketed between $80,000 - $85,000. A private street will service these areas. On the east side of the public north/south road are single level rambler-style townhomes of approximately 1,200 --1,300 sq. ft. The density is four units/acre. These units are served by a public street with two access points along the public street. The townhomes east of the pond will remain the same; however, the original plan showed access from the south. Now the developer is proposing the private street to come from the north. Twenty-nine additional guest parking spaces have been provided along this private street. The total density for Block 6 is 3.3. Homeowners' associations will be established for all multi-family areas. The single family lots are located in the NE comer of the development. A 20' public path has been located in the NE comer of the site abutting Lot 9, Block 4, on Cashell Glenn Road and Lot 1, Block 3, Deerwood Ponds Addition. It is the recommendation of staff that an additional path be developed along the west property line of Lot 1, Block 4, if feasible. This would provide access for the western portion of the site. All lots meet, or exceed the minimum R-1 requirements. As proposed, the multi-family buildings (R-2, R-3, and R-4) meet the standards as set forth in Subd. 6H. - Exterior Building Finish - which state that at least 50% of any exterior finish shall consist of a combination of materials which are non-combustible, non-degradable, and maintenance-free. The landscape plan shows a good mixture of overstory and understory deciduous trees, as well as evergreens. The applicant is preserving some of the existing vegetation around the pond which includes many mature trees. PARKS & RECREATION: The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this plat at their September meeting and gave the following recommendations: The proposal is subject to a cash parks dedication. The proposal is subject to a cash trails dedication. The developer grade an 8' wide pad to the Deerwood School property within the trailway easement. The developer coordinate the alignment, grading, and sequencing with the school district. ' The site plan preserve the oak stand at the-NW edge of the pond. ' The developer provide a tree protection plan for City review and approval prior to Final Plat. • The site plan provide 28,800 sq. ft. of recreational open space. _ l . GRADING/DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: The 30 acre site contains a mixture of open fields and wooded areas and a 2 acre pond (Pond BP-4) located in the center of the site. The preliminary grading plan shows that a majority of the site will be disturbed by the site grading. However, the existing trees around Pond BP-4 are proposed to be saved and also a row of trees along the north property line are shown to be saved. The grading for the site will require a maximum cut of 18' and a maximum fill of 12'. A small amount of grading will occur off the site beyond the northwest corner of the site on the Deerwood Middle School Addition development. Any existing wells or septic systems on this site shall be abandoned prior to the grading of this site according to City and Dakota County requirements. Locations of the wells and septic systems shall be shown on the final grading plan. The drainage from this site will be directed to Pond BP-4 which is a pond of the City's Stormwater Management Plan. In addition to the direct drainage of approximately 70 acres that drains to BP-4 an additional 3,700 acres drains to the pond. On the south end of BP-4 is a 42" storm sewer line with an invert elevation of 8683 that drains into the pond. There is also a 36" line that drains Diffley Road that discharges into the south end of the pond. The City currently has an outlet for Pond BP-4 with a controlled elevation at 874.2. Because of the nearly 6 foot difference in elevations of the outlet compared to the invert of the 42" line entering the pond, the City is studying how to revise the storm sewer in this area to lower the normal water level of the pond to closer match the invert elevation of the -42" line. By lowering the normal water level of Pond BP-4, it would allow the 42" line to drain more effectively into the pond and eliminate some maintenance problems that the City is now incurring. The grading and drainage plan shall include a storm sewer line along the east/west public street to the west property line of this site.. The storm sewer line is needed to provide drainage for an 8.3 acre area of future development west of this site. The development will be responsible for instaling and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. Pond BP-4 and the trees around the pond shall be protected from erosion of sediments. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS PROTECTION: This development lies in Drainage B, a short distance upstream from Blackhawk Lake. Blackhawk Lake is designated a Class I water body and is intended to have water of sufficient high quality to support direct contact recreation. Runoff from the proposed development will eventually reach Blackhawk Lake and, if not treated, would degrade its quality. Staff will recommend that this developer provide an additional 2.4 acre-feet of excavated wet pond volume in Pond BP-4. It has not yet been decided whether the City will require a cash dedication from the developer, then do the work itself, or whether the developer will be requested to do the work. The City is also considering the possibility of using water quality dedication funds to further enhance the ability of Pond BP-4 to treat stormwater. In addition, the City will lower the elevation'of the control structure for Pond BP-4 and drop the normal water level in the pond by about 3.2 feet. This project would be done as a public improvement project by the City using City funds and would alleviate a problem that causes a back-up of poor quality water into Heine Pond (Pond BP-5). Heine Pond is one of six Class I lakes in the City and has experienced severe degradation in water quality this year because of this problem. There are several wetlands on-site which are subject to regulation under the Wetland Conservation Act. The developer is currently preparing a report that inventories and assesses prospective impacts to these wetlands, and outlines what measures will be taken to avoid and minimize these impacts. It will also discuss any replacement requests. City staff will review the report and present their recommendations to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on October 3. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is available to serve this site from an 8" line on Diffley Road or from an existing 27" trunk sewer on the east side of the property. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to the 8" line on Diffley at the public street connection opposite Heine Court. Also, a connection is shown to the 27" line in two locations. One location is to serve the private street area in the southeast corner of the site and another location is in the northeast corner of the site at the intersection of Cashell Glen in the Deerwood Ponds Addition. As shown on the preliminary utility plan, sanitary sewer shall be stubbed to the west property line in the east/west public street to serve the future development of property to the west of this site. Watermain of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this development from an existing 12" watermain on Diffley Road, from an existing 6" watermain along the east property line in the development of Knob Hill of Eagan, from a 6" watermain in Cashell Glen, and from an 8" watermain in the Deerwood Elementary School site. The watermain layout shall include a looping system fed by the City's Intermediate Pressure Zone watermains. As shown on the preliminary utility plans, the watermain layout shall include an 8" stub in the northeast corner of the site that will connect to the existing 8" watermain provided by the Deerwood Elementary School. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is proposed in two locations. The site plan shows connecting to Diffley Road (Dakota County Road 30) opposite Heine Court with a public street that will run in a northerly direction. The preliminary site plan also shows connecting to Cashell Glen which is a street in the Deerwood Ponds development in the northeast portion of the site. The preliminary site plan shows a stub street with a permanent cul-de-sac at the west property line of the' site. If development occurs to the west in the future, the cul-de-sac would be removed and the street extended to the west. 141. r• The townhouse units along the east side of Pond BP-4 are proposed to be served with a private street that will head northerly and connect into the public street in the northeast corner of the site. The townhouse and quadriminium units along the west side of Pond BP4 will be served by private streets that will connect to the north-south public street. The north/south public street from Diffley Road up to the east/west public street shall be a 36' wide street. The east/west public street from Cashell Glen to the north/south public street shall be a 32' wide street. The private streets shall be designed according to the City standards with bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gutter. . EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The final plat shall dedicate a permanent drainage and utility easement over Pond BP-4 up to its high water level. The sanitary sewer and watermains that will be provided to serve the quadriminium cluster housing units and townhouse units in the private street areas shall have permanent drainage and utility easements dedicated over the main lines. A permanent right-of-way shall be dedicated by the developer over the cul-de-sac along the west property line of the site. The east/west public street and the north/south public street shall have 60' of right-of-way dedicated over the streets. The development will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, Minnesota Department of Health, MWCC, Minnesota DNR, Dakota County Highway Department, Corps of Engineers, etc.) are obtained prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Wenzel Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit S.F. 1725/ff 1,887.68 if $32,562 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit S.F. 25.25/ff 1,315.16 if 33,208 Water Lateral Benefit S.F. 20.30/ff 594.01 if 12,058 Storm Sewer Storm Sewer Trunk M.F. .018/S.F. 810,940 S Y. 97 Total 292,425 There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance $50,104.77 which will be allocated to the . newly oriented parcels. In addition, there is approximately $ 115,264 of Green Acres postponed installments that will become due when this. parcel, or its successor parcels, are no longer eligible for Green Acres status. • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FOR WENZEL ADDITION 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a five-year period. 2. Each housing style (other than the single family) shall have compatible exterior colors. 3. All trash shall be contained within the unit until the day of pick up. 4. A Comprehensive Landscape Plan shall be submitted with the first phase of development. 5. All common green space areas shall be irrigated. 6. All signage shall be subject to Sign Code requirements and the one-time sign of $2.50/sq: ft. 7. All Code R-3 and R-4 exterior finish requirements shall be adhered to. PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS FOR WENZEL ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 19, 1990 shallbe complied with: -Al,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,D1,El,F1,G1,andHi 2. Snow fencing shall be installed around the trees located near-the pond to ensure tree preservation during grading and construction. The snow fence will be inspected prior to issuance of any grading permit. 3. All plant material shall meet City minimum standards. 4. Boulevard trees shall be allowed 7' from back of curb on single family lots. 5. Existing well and septic systems shall be removed and inspected by proper agencies. 6. Homeowners and condominium associations shall be formed and declaration of covenants shall be provided to the City prior to Final Plat. 7. A storm sewer stub that will be designed to drain 8.3 acres shall be provided at the west property line of the site in the east/west public street. 8. 8" sanitary sewer and 8" watermain shall be stubbed to the west property line of the site at the east/west public street. 9. The watermain layout shall include the extension of an 8" line in the northeast corner of the site that will connect to an existing 8" watermain stub provided through the Deerwood Elementary School site. 10. The east/west public street and the north/south public street shall have 60' of right- of-way dedicated over the streets. 11. A storm sewer stub that will be designed to drain &3 acres shall be provided at the west property line of the site in the cast/west public street. 12. 8" sanitary sewer and 8" watermain shall be stubbed to the west property line of the site at the east/west public street. 13. The watermain layout shall include the extension of an 8" line in the northeast corner of the site that will connect- to an existing 8" watermain stub provided through the Deerwood Elementary School site.. 14. The east/west public street and the north/south public street shall have 60' of right- of-way dedicated over the streets. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 2. This development shall accept Its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval-. 8. Basements and Riabt -cf-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered.over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth,, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water. elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Boecification• 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STA*:DARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public bearing by council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. C. rater Ouality Dedication 1. This development shall. be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. 8. 2ther 1. All standard platting and -toning conditions shall*be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. advisory Planning Commission* City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 100 1990 plataprv.con - LTS $2 AVE°ORT df~ q gpy_~ AVE IROfI Rw -•Z STREET MAP N SW ° 8 J S LN ARK RD IIL Pi. 4o Rd tic yp MElw CT. itTLEr R • ~r~j~ Ll 1 ZONING MAP FRB P A M • D-I 04 K[M ff I . 'PF •n ~ Nf PF ' COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP W ~ 111 1 0.1 Wenzel Additon E1Fw wa• • 'ski 4 ~ w . •AOpO » • o6Q .-I Oro UY school c « i !t-~ :r ~..r eft!•tooo Mlil • • ej » J.f • • • • • • • « . r • r C Val err _ ..•.a• • e jj~ 1 i •t r . : Ile MOD •a.:aa«a:V I 1 i 1~ • ••.yi.~ _ pia f II / I DS -1 lop f g CO 0 'ev EQ SAY, Dtttley Road toll all ! 1;! 3~ iii ilk f oft LLI p LO .10 LL, 1= is t - ! ' • D ss aJ ie ••1 o Nls p t,~ ,y , .1 ~ _ • r + ,v • a ?~t as V a p N ~ _ is a I t d ~ Z i 7 • . Ji. • i r' A 1 7 d •//J• Ssr s 1 ~Tflis~,r• n s. tistl_--- - 1 Ili r + •"fie °0 . /i v SEr. o+ .o.: _ A ° a ,e,0 d "G ~C• L ;vo ~ m 00 " ' ° Q A °?wa a e 0 ~ • v yat' ° rr i a?, ~ ~ waw b ~L•o L r'!n Q~ e. i e e0 e e e e ° d is 0.0 S p •il.. e • 4•,~ • ~.a ` of ~ - L~~kit7 `~~a • On + p .3 .D . 'a~ • as a.' a L • 1 L • p ° l O ! ` ~jSO ABC/ • d`~'S ' ae0 40 so 14 D•d I i r .1, ha 9r• +rll w .A / ° _ , o me = _ - aC - - - - - - _ - ••a rrrrrrr ~rrrrrr-r - WENZELL ADDITION WENSMANN HOMES, INC. EAGA N, MINNESOTA 3312-151St STREET WEST r .n~7 ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOT 5068 MEDIUM RANGE TOWNHOMES i. .I I 0 d O - X D Jill J O _ 1 I [IIII111)11U i IpjifIlllJ i E] 0 Cl z m m ~ O I 1 ' N i 5q. LJ a°d II LLU xl Z m o --1 0 z - I, -lam. % 48• B-b ~~~C Lf -q S '864;~~ ' 6 rr-A-4,'Tr. 77, 1870.6 JP-5~ JP=3T osP-3 f2.0 77 / . 8P-359032 / S 9-08.0 T4.Cl..4920.2 747.- jt3P" BP-25 874.2 ` • ` 886.5 L•i. A B-s 924.9 a 882:1 .1o 119 P-•T 2 1~ 927. n! BB6:q: ` 835.;C x! 9 24.i rr 5.1 r L 92..5 B42 t. s A 90 i. "so 9000 g_• _..Y..._.: T t,rr 19200.,aT .P-2,8 l CA K : ~•T' 892 _ 1. BP-23 840.• ! 1it 90,1 r-a 648.C _8P-9 .9313 f;yt-v _ Y 1 BB29z:: C-a T 91 F.3 = S a t j 7 - 9/9.6: BP- :'h7j 'seeP9g=r6 x 6PI0` ~CSr~ r Bp- :-.ee t' 'L.v r E~:Eo;y• A .90,98- 9/6.0 Z 8=i' 15 8P-18.2 gt5' Q./~ .may 1=3 ~s P!- 137- LEGEND POIDINS AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . STORM SEWERS (•sIIg) . . . . . . . * STORM SEWERS (FI•oa••O . . STORM LOT STATION (••Yriq) . . . . ¦ STORM LOT STATION (R"O"B . . . . . . . O STORM FORCE MAIN ? MAJOR DIVISION at•~ POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL . . . . . 900.0 /ONO "am WATER LEVEL . . . . . . . . . 000.0 OVERLAND ORASIASE ROUTE s ss s ssza FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN .~1 128 .37'$)b0. i 12T cs>. ~ g •0/ 12 ® C~ 1 75.0,}dROUND f 12 • 'UMANN --J STORAQE' 121 /69.0 _ 6Z 24.6/ 125 1 o Ibl li~ r PrRR .EE.0 16 too T2.Tl~lia.0 0 1. KNOB 171 fir 95.3/ 50 : 60 w129 pp7.0 !64 172 t2•. 159 i ~r' ID 1 ? ' ` -8 lop a~ ree,ss.0. 1¢r, - 16`x• TN:MAS )f ''i ' T 167 1 rr ''.:..J 71.1/92.0 101.0 B~-s'ii~i =C+MtR u'IU'~ ~Sfi17 OT v 17 -~4Ga r' 104.0 126 56 94.0 n f 168 T PAP K $.0 s; ah:a LIA~'G.. I .97 9</ 955.0 0 .LEGEND* Existing Trunk Water Main © Point Designations Intermediate Level Pressure Zone ~N- Proposed Trunk Water Main Pressure Zone Boundary Existing Lateral Water Main 0 Existing Pressure Reducing Station Proposed Lateral Water Main 4E- Proposed Pressure Reducing Station Existing Storage Reservoir ® Pressure Reducing Station Control Elevations t}--- Proposed Storage Reservoir Residual Prissure p.s.i / Static Pressure p.s.i. • FIGURE No. 8 Water Distribution System CITY OF EAGAN W Q Z o W W W Z Z2Z mmm a aaa N ggg t o ~ lr 1 ~ ~ V Z ~ 1-6 i i • I -?n Jo -1-1 it I•fj f 301 ~i:•... e. 2.1 lot se'll Y y y i z - AIT q li~! all Q . N , ~ 11 ~ a a k id • • AV ::s:.