Loading...
12/03/1992 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionMEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1992 RE: ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 3, 1992 The last regular meeting of 1992 for the Advisory Commission, scheduled on December 3, will begin at 7:00 p.m. Staff had hoped to have had the opportunity to have a pre- commission meeting to discuss park naming. However, we were unable to connect successfully with Mr. Carroll to establish a date for that so this item will again have to be continued. There are two items on the Consent Agenda. A single motion to approve the Consent Agenda, unless there are questions or concerns by the members of the Advisory Commission, would be appropriate. There are no items under Development Proposals. If the Commission would like, staff can briefly cover the proposals that appear to be coming to the Advisory Commission in the very near future which have recently been submitted to the City. New Business There are three items under New Business. The first item is the Minnesota Valley Trail Resolution. Staff has prepared a brief memorandum and a support resolution for the Advisory Commission's review. Staff will also be attending a meeting on December 4 concerning the interlink between the cities of Minneapolis and Eagan via the Mendota Bridge. Staff will be providing additional comments concerning this item. The second item under New Business is softball eligibility changes. Members may recall that last year's policy change was implemented providing for a $25.00 non-resident fee. In working with the softball committee, changes are being recommended by that committee to the City. Staff would like to review those changes with you. The last item under New Business is St. Thomas Beckett Church trails dedication review. Again, staff has prepared a brief memorandum concerning this particular item in which the church requests the extension of credit against their trails dedication requirements because of trails constructed internally to their development. Under Parks Development, staff will update the Advisory Commission on the progress of Blackhawk Park, which because of the poor weather, has been quite minimal. Staff will also update the Advisory Commission on a number of other projects that are pending the planning the parks. Water Ouality There are several items under Water Quality for the Commission's review. Water Resources Coordinator, Rich Brasch, has prepared memorandums concerning these particular items and will be available to explain these to the Advisory Commission. her Business and R Following Department Happenings, staff would like to apprise the Commission of the Community Oriented Policing Program that the Department is now involved with. Staff has prepared a memorandum for you on this particular item and would like the Advisory Commission to pay particular attention to it because of the potential future involvement of the Recreation and Parks division in this particular policing effort. As always, if members are unable to make the regular Commission meeting, it. would be appreciated if you would contact the Department and notify us of your absence. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation KV/dj D2COVERDEC.MEM d. AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, December 3, 1992 7:00 PM Eagan Municipal Center A. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance C. Approval of Agenda D. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 5, 1992 F. Visitors to be Heard G. Consent Agenda (1) Braun Sunrise 2nd Addition - Henry A. Braun (2) Park Center 3rd Addition - Taco Bell Corporation H. Development Proposals 1. Old Business (1) Park Naming (2) Parks/Trails Dedication Review J. New Business (1) Minnesota Valley Trail Resolution (2) Softball Eligibility Change (3) St.Thomas Beckett Church - Trails Dedication Review K. Parks Development (1) Blackhawk Park Update L. Water Quality (1) Proposed Rules Overview/Wetlands Conservation Act (2) Status of Wetland Mappi ng/C I assi fi cation (3) Re-classification of Pond LP-47 M. Other Business and Reports (1) Department Happenings (2) Report on Community Oriented Policing (COP) N. Round Table 0. Adjournment '3. Subject to Approval MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 5, 1992 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 5, 1992 with the following Commission Members present: Ted Billy, Jonathan Widem, Kevin Knight, Dan Mooradian, Erin Ipsen, and Jack Johnson. Commission Members Deborah Johnson and Lee Markel) were not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Park Planner; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Under Other Business and Reports, Director Vraa added (3) Joint Commission/Council Meeting and (4) Request and Proposal from Dakota, Inc. Dan Mooradian moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 1, 1992 Kevin Knight moved, Erin Ipsen seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes of October 1, 1992 as presented. CONSENT AGENDA After review of the park and trail dedication issues by Park Planner Stephen Sullivan and review of the water quality issues by Water Resources Coordinator Rich Brasch, Erin Ipsen moved, Jonathan Widem seconded the motion to make the following recommendations to the City Council. All members voted in favor. Preliminary Plat - Toby Stevens. This plat was reviewed by the Commission at their October 1,1992 meeting with subsequent recommendations having been made to the City Council. Town Ctr 70 13th Add. - McDonald's Corporation. This proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. This proposal be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality standards. The cash dedication will apply only to Lot 1,Block 1. Water quality requirements for Outlot A will be defined at a future date. WENZEL ADDITION - WENSMANN REALTY Director Vraa reminded the Commission that Mr. Wensmann was present at the October commission meeting and was directed to provide a grading plan to staff reflecting the changes proposed in the plat. Ken continued that the grading plan has not been received to date, however, the plan has been approved by the Advisory Planning Commission. It was noted that the City Council is reviewing this item at their meeting this evening and that the recommendation for approval will be contingent upon the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendations after reviewing the issue at their December meeting. Ted Billy moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to carry this item over to the December 3, 1992 meeting. 5 Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 2 POND JP-69 - DIFFLEY/DANIEL PARCEL Director Vraa reviewed this agenda item with the Commission noting that there were two separate issues that would need to be addressed. The first issue dealt with the Commission's approval, rejection or modification to the development of a storm water retention pond identified as JP-69 located within the 5.6 acre parcel. The pond consumes only a portion of the subject parcel thus the second issue for the Commission's consideration is to make a recommendation regarding the intended use of the remaining portion of the property. Ken reminded the Commission that they had reviewed the grading plan for the proposed retention pond at their October meeting. Since the October meeting staff has re-reviewed the grading for the pond area and has seen no need for substantial changes to the design. The current plan preserves a significant amount of trees on the east side adjacent to the residential properties, is approximately 1.5 acres with a normal water elevation of 946. The high water elevation will be at a 952 with the pond bottom at an elevation of 943 which leaves 3 feet of water in the pond. Ken noted that this wet volume promotes water quality and provides for an aesthetic pond. The pond also meets the storm water volumetric needs and promotes effective water quality while preserving the greatest number of significant trees on the site. The design also provides for development of the remaining residual property either as single family lots and/or as park. After further discussion, Kevin Knight moved, Jonathan Widem seconded the motion with all members voting in favor to accept the grading plan for pond JP-69 as presented. Director Vraa identified the second issue for the Commission to consider is the determination of what to do with the residual portion of this property. It was noted that the preferred use suggested by the residents is for preservation of the trees on this property and that it be used for a developed park. Ken explained that staff has reviewed this request and it is clear that the site could accommodate a hard court and play equipment area without significant disruption to the resource. It could also accommodate a relatively small, five to seven stall parking lot if necessary. As background Mr. Vraa explained that the residual land borders Daniel Drive and utilities were stubbed in when Daniel Drive was upgraded to allow for the eventual sale of these lots. Ken continued that staff met with the neighboring residents on Monday, November 2 to solicit their input. The residents expressed their concern for safety in this area as well as their desire to have an accessible play space. Based on that input, athletic development on the site has been ruled out resulting in staff researching a playground and hard court area. The total estimate including play equipment, hard court, parking lot, grading and site restoration could range from $42-48,000. Further discussion with the residents indicated the potential for a trailway off Diff ley that would, perhaps, loop through the wooded area on the north and then come back to Diffley. Landscape Architect/Park Planner Sullivan noted that the subject parcel is located within the north central edge of Park Service Area 26 which include all the residential property west of Dodd Road, south of County Road 30, north of County Road 32, and east of County Road 43. The PSA limits were expanded with the rezoning from CSC to Single Family as a result of the Lexington Pointe Additions. The parks serving this PSA are Walnut Hill Park and Trapp Farm Park with the entire park service population, including the subject parcel and neighborhood, located within 3/4 mile of these two parks. It is anticipated that the buildout population would be approximately 4,700 (the Park Systems Plan's standards for service by a neighborhood park is 2-5,000 residents). tP Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 3 Steve continued that maintenance of the residual property allows for open spa ce for a smal l playground area that would more accessibly serve the approximately 50 children in the immediate area.. Steve reiterated that the playground at Walnut Hill is approximately 3/4 mile from this area and Trapp Farm Park is approximately 1/2 mile away. Northview Elementary School is immediately north of this parcel, however County Road 30 makes access difficult to this playground. It was noted that in discussions with the Engineering Department regarding the upgrading of County Road 30, the installation of a semaphore on Braddock and Co. Rd. 30 to provide a safe access to Northview Elementary School may be considered. This could be further enhanced by a crosswalk with pedestrian activated lights in the future. Another alternative outlined for Commission consideration was the sale of the residual land for eight single family lots. Staff anticipates that the five southerly lots would sell for no less than $30,000 and the three remaining lots would be less given their location and proximity to the Diffley and Daniel Drive intersection. Yet another alternative presented for consideration was to have the City keep the property at its current R-1 zoning and defer a decision based on future information and need. It was noted that the down side of this option may be the interpretation that the property is zoned for "parks' and not R-1 resulting in confusion if the property is developed at a later date. Mr. Vraa reiterated the options available to the Commission; 1) Recommend the sale of residual property for lot development, 2) Apportion the residual portion for residential lot development reserving the remainder for parks use, 3) Retain all the residual property for parks use or 4) Retain the property, do not change zoning classification from R-1 thus reserving the opportunity to review the parcel and parkland needs at a later date. Chairman Jack Johnson invited anyone in the audience to share their comments and concerns. Larry Foster asked if the numbers used in calculating the use in this PSA were current numbers or those anticipated at build out. Mr. Vraa responded that the numbers were based on future build out. Pat Connolly, 921 Curry Trail (Lot 1, Block 1) noted that his children were older and perhaps would not be using a playground nearby but shared his concern for the large number of children that live in this area. He continued that there is no safe access to the parks that are currently within this PSA where parents could feel comfortable letting them go to these parks alone. He noted that the concerns of the neighbors should be a high priority as the Commission reviews this issue. Mr. Connolly then pointed out several areas where small parks were provided for neighborhoods that did not have as many people in them as this neighborhood. Lakeside Park and Oak Chase Park were targeted as such parks. Mr. Connolly continued that although there were parks near this neighborhood, the accessibility was poor; he indicated there was no trail to get to Walnut Hill Park nor was there easy access to Trapp Farm Park. The safety of the children in this area was of utmost importance to Mr. Connolly. Pat commented that a bike path along he Highline Trail was to go in three years ago and still was not completed. Jack Johnson asked why the original trail planned along Daniel Drive was eliminated. As DirectorVraa began explaining the background of this issue, Pat Connolly interjected that he would clarify the history for the Commission. Mr.Connol ly stated that the trail along Daniel Drive was going to move to the south side because that land was zoned other than residential and it was felt this would be a better location for the trail. When the property was re-zoned to residential it was felt that it would be unsafe for a trail to cross several driveways, Mr. Connolly continued. There was a bike path planned to Trapp Farm Park, however, in Mr. Connolly's opinion, it was not a good location because the trail seemed to just terminate on the hill near Trapp Farm Park. He also stated that the incline was such that it would be very difficult for pedestrians to use a stroller on this section of trail. I• Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 4 Steve Sullivan clarified that the intent of having a trail along Daniel Drive was because of it's natural north/south route making the distance from Curry Trail to Trapp Farm Parka distance of .4 miles. Steve added that staff's intention is to provide the most efficient transportation for neighborhoods to parks with a strong concern for safety. It was felt that the trail along Daniel Drive was the safest option at the time. Homeowner of 913 Curry Trail noted that this will be a very heavily developed area. He continued that he understands the financial impact to the city in holding these lots but expressed his preference for leaving the area just as it is. He felt that developing more homes in this location seemed like overkill. He suggested that the city consider leaving the property as it is and allow the residents to maintain it; something similar to 'adopting' the park. Mr. Vraa responded that this has been done in the past and may be a consideration. Marsha Schoemaker who lives at the intersection of Braddock and Daniel Drive indicated that she has three children and provides day care service to other children. She continued that she does not feel comfortable sending children to either Walnut Hill Park or Trapp Farm Park without going along. She would prefer a park closer to the neighborhood to allow children to go to the park without their parents. Jack Johnson asked if there had been any consideration given to providing an overpass to Northview School during the upgrading of County Road 30. Ken Vraa responded that that had not been a consideration; rather, thought was being given to the semaphore on Braddock and Diffley. Ms. Schoemaker indicated that even if there was an easier access to Northview School she didn't think that using the playground during the school day was allowed and she would still not be comfortable allowing children to cross Diffley at that point. Pat Connolly reiterated that this is the only area of this size that doesn't have direct access to a park and the City needs to look at what's best for this neighborhood.. Jack Johnson explained that there will be access to parks once the trail links are completed in this area. Ryan Neese, 4224 Daniel Drive indicated that he has been in the neighborhood for only two months. He continued that one of the factors in purchasing their home was the wooded area directly across from them and they would like to see that maintained as it is. He also asked if it was feasible to place a trail completely around the pond. Mr. Vraa responded that a trail of this type could be done, however there would be substantial tree loss in order to accommodate that request. Since expenditure of dollars seemed to be an issue, Mr. Connolly asked what the cost was for the development of Oak Chase Park and Lakeside Park. Mr. Vraa responded that in order to give a more current cost figure perhaps the park near Manor Lake would be a more accurate comparison at this time. Ken continued that the Manor Lake park site is approximately five acres in size and consists of open space that has been graded with 3/4 acre of wetland. The park was graded as part of an agreement with the developer as a cost savings measure. Ken added that the cost of the land, parking lot, playground, ballfield and hard court was approximately $130,000. Mr. Connolly again reiterated that their neighborhood area will be larger at build out than the Manor Lake area and felt that $42-48,000 would not be an outrageous price to pay for park improvements. Mr. Vraa clarified that the $42-48,000 amount reflected only the costs for improvement to the land but did not include the cost of the land and the assessments that had to be paid. When asked what that figure was, Mr. Vraa responded that it was $19,000/acre or approximately $138-140,000 plus the assessments on the property. In response to comments from Mr. Connolly, Jack Johnson explained that the Commission's job is to try to determine what the best use for this residual property will be and make a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Johnson added that the existing Park System Plan does not call for a park in this area. An issue that will need to be weighed is setting a precedent by providing a park in response to a request from a neighborhood where one was normally not planned. Jack continued that the Commission's task is to provide for parks throughout the City in a very planned manner to meet the needs of the whole community as well as the neighborhoods. F. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 5 Tish Wetstone, 917 Curry Trail, noting that she was new in the area, asked what happened to the dollars that were collected by the developer that were originally dedicated for trails. Steve Sullivan responded that any dollars collected for trails dedication fees are placed in the trails dedication fund and are used to enhance the trail system throughout the City. Ms. Wetstone expressed her concern for the safety of pedestrians and bikers along Daniel Drive because it is a very busy street. She suggested that consideration be given to placing a white line on the street. Director Vraa stated he would check with the City Engineer and suggested that the residents follow up with Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works to see if this option would be feasible. Mr. Joe Heubner, noting there was significant interest by the neighborhood to have this park, suggested that they be allowed to help with the maintenance or upkeep if a park is developed. Dan Mooradian asked what impact not selling these lots would have on the development of already existing parks and those that are planned to be built in the next several years. Mr. Vraa responded that this particular parcel of land was purchased from the Park Site Fund which can only be used for park acquisition or development. Since approximately $150,000 was taken from this fund to purchase these lots, there is that much less in the fund for development of parks. The question that needs to be addressed, Mr. Vraa continued, is the importance of this issue in relationship to the C.I.P. and if it is determined that this is a park to be developed, than direction will need to be given as to the time frame and the dollars that will be expended. Ted Billy clarified that the City was required to purchase this tract of land , along with other small tracts,as a condition for purchasing the Lexington/Diffley site. Jonathan Widem asked what the intention was for this land at the time it was purchased. Mr. Vraa responded that the Council directed the re-sale of this land and wanted it downzoned from R-4 to R-1, which did occur. Mr. Mooradian asked how often the City has purchased property that it did not intend to use and Mr. Vraa responded this is the first time he has seen this occur since he has been with the City of Eagan. Kevin Knight reiterated that this is a very unique situation since the development of a park in this area is not currently in the Park System Plan. Kevin continued that since there are a significant number of trees on these lots he would like to see as many trees kept as possible. There is a fair amount of parkland within this PSA, however, Mr. Knight agreed that perhaps a modest playground or play area would be appropriate. His suggestion was that the two closest lots to Curry be used for play area and/or hard court and that the balance of the lots along Daniel Drive be sold. Mr. Johnson asked if a park could be placed on two lots. Mr. Sullivan responded that it would be tight but it may be possible. Kevin Knight reiterated that he would prefer to see the trees on the eastern most lot be kept. Pat Connolly interjected that three lots would provide a better buffer to the existing neighbors on Curry Trail. Jack Johnson asked Mr.Sullivan if he would be able to estimate how many trees would need to be removed to accommodate a playground on two lots. Steve responded that he would need to look at some options but trees would need to be removed. Dan Mooradian indicated his biggest concern is the eastern most lot on Daniel Drive that butts up to Lots 1 and 2 since it appears to be the most valuable lot. It is the lot that will bring the most revenue because it is wooded but selling it would eliminate any buffer from the immediately adjacent lots along Curry Trail. Mr. Connolly again interjected that ideally, the neighbors would like to have that lot left as it is. Erin Ipsen expressed her concern for the precedent this decision can set. She continued that the Commission's responsibility is to look at the City as a whole and if this request is approved there will be many more neighborhoods with similar circumstances that will be requesting a park closer to their home. Jack Johnson added that this long-range issue may be best discussed as the Parks System Plan is being upgraded. Its possible, Mr. Johnson continued, that one of the things that could be discovered in the process is the need for mini parks just as is being discussed at this site. Erin suggested that if the Commission was going to pursue a park at this site that two lots be set aside, that the Parks System Plan be updated and if it is determined that a park should not go into this location, then the lots can be sold. Dan Mooradian added that if lots were set aside, he would not be in favor of developing them at this time. Another point brought up by Ms. Ipsen was which park will wait for development to occur in order to accommodate this new addition to parks. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5,1992 Meeting Page 6 After further discussion, Jonathan Widem moved that the top five lots, from Diffley to Curry Trail, be sold for development and that the three lots on Daniel Drive closest to Curry Trail be held for eventual development of a mini-park. Ted Billy stated that the lots could be sold as suggested but questioned if the City would be any richer. He suggested leaving the parcel as it is and if at some point in the future it becomes necessary to sell them, a decision can be made at that time. Again Ted reiterated wanting to leave the land as it is in its natural condition. Kevin Knight stated he agreed with Mr. Widem's motion and agreed that most all objectives can be met by keeping 2-3 lots. He continued that there should be some flexibility in determining whether 2 or 3 lots are needed to provide the playground area discussed. Director Vraa suggested that the Commission may want to look at some possible layouts to see if other lots may be more appropriate for a park. Jonathan Widem suggested maintaining the eastern most lot for tree preservation and consider open space and play area being installed on the two lots west. Steve Sullivan reminded the Commission that there are a number of parameters to look at when designing a park; one being that a small playground/open play area may result in the neighborhood using the park for a very limited amount of time and then will find the need for more facilities that are already within their PSA. Steve suggested that the Commission may want to look long term at providing better access to the parks to the south . After further discussion, there was no second to Mr. Widem's motion. Kevin Knight then moved and Jonathan Widem seconded the motion to have staff develop a plan for a park to include playground and hard court surface to be located within the lots owned by the City of Eagan from Diffley Road to Curry Trail and that the balance of the lots be sold for development. The number of lots and location of lots has not been determined as yet and will be dependent upon the park design. Those voting in favor included Erin Ipsen, Jack Johnson, Jonathan Widem, Dan Mooradian and Kevin Knight. Ted Billy was opposed. The motion was carried. Ryan Neese added that he was in favor of leaving the area in a natural state. He would not be opposed, however to selling the three western most lots for development and leaving the balance for park. Director Vraa added that the residents had also requested consideration be given to providing a trail corridor on the north side of the pond, parallel to Diffley Road. Ken indicated that two options had been discussed; one was a loop.trail that would bring traffic into the wooded area north of the pond and then back to the trail on Diffley and the other option was a spur trail that would allow walkers to enter the wooded area, overlook the pond and then walk back to Diffley Road. In response to a question from Kevin Knight regarding the cost for such a trail, Mr. Vraa responded that a loop trail of 250-300 feet would be approximately $2,500- 3,000. After further discussion, Jonathan Widem moved, Ted Billy seconded the motion with all members voting in favor to recommend the construction of a spur trail that will leave Diffley Road north of the pond and terminate just north of the pond. PARK SERVICE AREA 36E Director Vraa introduced this item reminding the Commission they had made a recommendation to the City Council in February of 1992 that the City seek parkland in the south 1/2 of Park Service Area 36E. The City Council subsequently approved that recommendation and instructed staff to begin the search fora park in that area. Ken identified two parcels as potential park sites; one owned by Mr. Jay Carroll and one owned by Mr. Neary. Mr. Carroll's property is 6 acres in size whereas Mr. Neary's property is 19 acres including his home. Mr. Vraa continued that there is no immediate need to acquire a park given the relatively undeveloped characteristics and lack of service population at this time although this would not preclude the Commission from being proactive in reviewing the need and location of a park for the future. /0. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 7 In reviewing Mr. Carroll's 6 acre parcel Mr.Vraa noted that access is via a private road not a public street which should be considered when thinking about its development as a public park. Another concern expressed was the potential for acquiring land that may be landlocked which is the case with the Neary property. Mr. Vraa reviewed some of the options for the Commission to consider which included acquiring Mr. Carroll's land; obtaining the back (south) portion of Mr. Neary's land; wait for development to occur and acquire land by dedication; look for the most appropriate parcel of land and acquire through condemnation if necessary; conclude that parkland is not an absolute necessity and not propose park acquisition at this time or whatever other option the Commission may determine is appropriate. Jack Johnson asked if the area south of the parcels being considered will be developed. Mr. Vraa responded that the assumption has been made that development will occur at some point in time but the timeframe is unknown. Ted Billy remembered there had been some conversation with Inver Grove Heights regarding the option of developing a shared park in this general area. Mr. Vraa responded that Inver Grove Heights is not interested in pursuing that option. Mr. Johnson stated that if there is a need for a park in this area he would favor waiting for development to occur and acquire parkland in the southern portion of the PSA through dedication . After further discussion Ted Billy moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to have staff identify suitable parcels of property that would be appropriate for a park so that when development occurs within PSA 36E necessary steps can be taken to acquire the property necessary to meet this need. PARK NAMING Park Naming was deferred to the December, 1992 meeting. PARKS/TRAILS DEDICATION REVIEW Director Vraa introduced this item as the Commission's annual reviewof the parks dedication and trails dedication after which the Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Vraa reviewed the history of dedication fees from 1989 through 1992 noting that the fees for 1992 remained consistent with 1991. As a point of clarification, Mr. Vraa noted that individual cash dedication fees are based on 'land value equivalence', i.e. the land value determined by the Commission each year for each different category of land use. Also provided for background was a survey completed in 1991 of several metropolitan communities relative to their perception in regard to area-wide land values and adjustments they may be planning between 1992-93. Ken continued that since there does not appear to be a wide-spread escalation of land values in the metro area that land values should be determined by an appraiser for next year's review of parks/trails dedication. Kevin Knight asked what the cost would be to hire an appraiser and wondered if the work could be done this year to help with the Commission's recommendation to the Council. Mr. Vraa responded that the cost will depend upon how much detail is required and felt that there wasn't sufficient time to have appraisals done before a recommendation is needed by the Council. Jack Johnson and Ted Billy both expressed their concern for making a land value decision without sufficient background. Ted Billy moved and Erin Ipsen seconded the motion to freeze rates for 1993 and hire an appraiser/consultant to review and analyze land values for review of the 1994 parks/trails dedication fees. Those voting for the motion were Erin Ipsen, Jack Johnson and Ted Billy. Those opposed were Jonathan Widem, Dan Mooradian and Kevin Knight. The motion did not pass. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5,1992 Meeting Page 8 Kevin Knight noted that parks/trails dedication is the department's major source of funds and he was not comfortable waiting until next year for appraisals and losing potential 1993 revenue. Kevin felt that the opportunity to capitalize on dedication fees will soon be gone as the City's development slows down. Jonathan Widem asked if an increase could be imposed in 1994 to make up for a freeze in 1993 rates since the rates are tied to land values. Mr. Vraa reminded the Commission that any increase would need to be substantiated as a "reasonable increase". This would eliminate the possibility of increasing 1994 rates to compensate for no rate increase in 1993. Mr. Widem suggested averaging the numbers over the last four years to calculate an average increase in land values as a basis for the 1993 rates. Jack Johnson expressed his concern for being able to justify such a calculated increase. Mr. Widem reiterated his agreement with Mr. Knight in not wanting to miss out on an opportunity to collect potential revenue. Jack Johnson indicated his discomfort with coming up with a land value amount that may be difficult to substantiate. He indicated his desire to maintain information that is as accurate as possible in setting fees. Ken Vraa added that the Commission can also use current assessed values which should be 95% of their market value if they indeed wanted to make a recommendation for increase. Mr. VonDeLinde reminded the Commission that the land value amounts will impact water quality fees also which may result in further scrutiny from developers. After further discussion Jonathan Widem moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to direct staff to get current assessments of land values on several parcels of land to help with the determination of 1993 fees and that a appraiser be hired to do an appraisal of land for the determination of 1994 parks/trails dedication fees. PROPOSED 1993 FEES AND CHARGES Director Vraa briefly reviewed the memo prepared by him and Superintendent of Recreation Peterson regarding fees and charges for facility use. Staff felt that the fees charged in 1992 should be carried over into 1993 with no proposed increases, however suggestions were made to consider new fees for youth travel soccer and youth travel hockey similar to those imposed on youth travel baseball. Another issue for the Commission to consider was the running of concessions by the City for adult outside tournaments held at Northview Athletic along with charging a minimum of $100/day for use of the concession room by youth baseball and softball tournaments held at that site. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved and Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend the 1993 facility use fees remain the same as in 1992. Further that travel soccer be assessed a fee of $60.00 per team similar to the fees currently assessed to travel softball and baseball. Travel hockey will be assessed a fee of $60.00 per team effective with their 1993-94 season. The City will run the concessions for adult outside tournaments held at Northview Athletic and will also charge youth sports tournaments run at Northview Athletic a minimum of $100.00/day for use of the concession room. CIP Director Vraa introduced this item noting that staff had prepared a draft CIP document for submission to the Commission and then to the City Council which covers the time frame of 1993-1997. Ken continued that since this is a draft document, it becomes more of a planning document than a budgetary document. If funds are not available for the items contained within the CIP, those items will be pushed back further into future years, get eliminated or a method of increased revenue will need to be found to complete the work. Mr. Vraa also mentioned that the CIP does not include maintenance, major capital improvements or building/structure replacement. Jonathan Widem commented that the City will need to be looking a large dollar expenditures for long term maintenance and replacement of the parks that are currently developed. Jonathan continued that it is difficult to thoroughly review the CIP without benefit of an updated Parks System Plan noting that that may become a very valuable tool in looking at this issue next year. /ot' Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5,1992 Meeting Page 9 After further discussion, Jack Johnson moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the CIP as presented. ISTEA GRANT APPLICATION/POLICY ON TRAILWAYS Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde explained that this ISTEA grant funding for municipal trails expansion has been presented to the City Council on September 20; before there was an opportunity to review it with the Commission since the submittal deadline for the grant application was November 2. John continued that this is an application for federal grant funding for the expansion of certain trailways within the City of Eagan. The city will be seeking funds under the Federal Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) for the construction of four new trails in the community. The total cost of the project is estimated at $478,700 of which 80% would be cost shared through the ISTEA grant. John added that since the City Council has already given their approval for submission of the application and authorized the corresponding changes to the trail system plan, it would be appropriate for the Commission to retroactively ratify the recommendations contained along with identifying priorities for the trail links. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved to approve an application to the Metropolitan Council for Federal cost sharing of trail expansion under the ISTEA Program and that approval be given to modify the existing Trail Systems Plan to include the development of trails along State Highway 149 and Town Centre Drive as identified. The Commission clarified that of the trails proposed, the first priority was to provide access to the Minnesota River Valley; the second priority was identified as trails along Hwy. 149 connecting to the proposed YMCA site; the third priority was access to the Town Centre area and the fourth priority- was the trails connection between Walnut Hill and Trapp Farm Parks. PARK SYSTEM PLAN STUDY Director Vraa, noting that the Commission had recently held a workshop session relative to the Park Systems Plan, explained that it would be appropriate that they determine if a recommendation should be made to the City Council to update a new Park Systems Plan which would update necessary components of the existing plan. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend to the City Council that a major revision to the existing Park Systems Plan be undertaken and that the financing for this plan come from the park site development fund. Further, the Commission, in seeking approval to develop a systems plan, recognized the need for the Commission to develop a scope of services for the consultant before Requests for Proposals are solicited. BLACKHAWK PARK UPDATE/BLACKHAWK PARK DESIGN MODIFICATION Stephen Sullivan noted that the recent snowfall has slowed up the completion of Blackhawk Park. He did note that the rough grading has been done, some of the topsoil is in, the parking lot has rock on it, the trail corridors have been graded and the boardwalk is in place. Steve was hopeful that with a thaw the curb could be installed yet this year. Mr. Sullivan continued with the proposed construction modifications to enhance the management of Blackhawk Lake. It was noted that slight grading modifications on either side of the south boardwalk abutment would provide accesses to both the east and west basins of the lake for weed harvesters and other aquatic management equipment. These accesses would provide more options to implement in-lake management measures and would limit the disturbance needed to create these features in one area immediately around the boardwalk. It is estimated that the cost will not exceed $4,000 and will be covered by ear-marked water quality improvement funds. /S Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 10 After further discussion, Jack Johnson moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the proposed construction modifications which include slight grading modifications on either side of the south boardwalk abutment to provide accesses to both the east and west basins of Blackhawk Lake for weed harvesters and other aquatic management equipment. The estimated cost of the work is not expected to exceed $4,000 and would be covered by water quality improvement funds. MINNESOTA RELIEF GRANT PROJECT/LEXINGTON SQUARE Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde introduced a grant which would provide for the development of a Forestry Department pilot program to use excelerated growth technology in a controlled area to enhance tree conservation. It was determined that the Lexington Square neighborhood (near Lexington and Wescott) which has 370 households would provide a good study area for this project. Two seedlings would be planted in each of the 370 yards and would be covered by a white tube which is used to excelerate growth of the trees. The tube is biodegradable and will disappear as the tree continues to grow and mature. The excelerated growth process occurs until the seedling reaches the top of the tube after which normal growth continues. Director Vraa added that several various options were considered for distribution of this planting program, however it was felt that the Lexington Square development was the most conducive to this type of project and could be monitored/managed very easily. Jack Johnson expressed the Commission's approval of the project and looks forward to hearing updates on how this project is progressing. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Items highlighted by Superintendent of Recreation Peterson included a program opportunity to create relationships between Northview Elementary students and Eagan Seniors; the first Eagan Seniors meeting will be held at the senior housing community room in November; the new cash management system through LOGIS which will mainstream the department's handling of registration receipts and Dakota Civic Theatre's first production which will occur on November 20. Also highlighted was the attendance of more than 700 youth and 300 adults at the Halloween Spook Trail at Thomas Lake Park. JOINT COMMISSION/COUNCIL MEETING Director Vraa reminded the Commission that a joint Commission/Council meeting has been scheduled for November 10 at 6 p.m. at the Municipal Center. The anticipated time frame is 1-1.5 hours with the items for discussion to include Forestry Department/Oak Wilt and Parks System Plan update. When asked if there were other issues that may need to be addressed Mr. Johnson responded that erosion control could also be addressed. Mr. Widem suggested that the Commission should stay focused on the Parks System Plan for this joint meeting and move onto erosion control at a later meeting with the Council. REQUEST AND PROPOSAL FROM DAKOTA, INC. John VonDeLinde explained that a letter had been received from Dakota, Inc. requesting their use of Quarry Park shelter building from November 23 through December 23, 1992. The request is based on a need to find temporary space to carry out their programming while remodeling of their Apple Valley site is occurring. The use would be Monday through Friday from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and they would keep the building in good condition by doing daily light maintenance followed by a deep clean when they are finished using the building. After further discussion, Kevin Knight moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to allow the use of Quarry Park shelter building by Dakota, Inc. from November 23 through December 23, 1992. In return, Dakota, Inc. will maintain the building in good condition and will accomplish a deep clean upon completion of their use. If the building is to be used for recreation programming before December 23, Dakota, Inc. will be notified immediately. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of November 5, 1992 Meeting Page 11 With no further business to conduct, Dan Mooradian moved, Erin lpsen seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Secretary Date /S. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1992 RE: CONSENT AGENDA, DECEMBER 3, 1992 1. BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION - HENRY A. BRAUN A Preliminary Plat of three single family lots on approximately 2.3 acres located along the south side of Braun Court east of Pilot Knob Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 15. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Braun Sunrise 2nd Addition be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 2. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Braun Sunrise 2nd Addition be subject to a cash trailways dedication. 2. PARK CENTER 3RD ADDITION - TACO BELL CORPORATION A Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class H restaurant in the Park Center Planned Development, a Preliminary Plat consisting of .98 acres, and a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Cliff Lake Drive in the SE 1/4 of Section 30. PARKS DEDICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. TRAILS DEDICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Park Center Planned Development Agreement had the developer responsible for trail costs and installation. A sidewalk has been installed along Cliff Lake Road east of the subject parcel and a bituminous trail is proposed along the south property line adjacent to Cliff Road. This trail is to be installed within a current contract. Maintaining a consistent approach in regards to trailway obligates the current application for the associated trail costs along Cliff Road. Therefore, staff recommends the following: 1. The proposal be subject to the costs of the bituminous trail along Cliff Road based on the lot frontage at the City's current trail rate. The cost shall be 254' frontage feet at $12.05 per foot obligating the applicant to a total trails cost of $3060.70. This amount shall be paid at the time of building permit application. /7 I MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BRAUN SUNRISE - 2ND ADDITION (CONSENT AGENDA ITEM) PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a single-family residential development consisting of three lots on approximately 2.3 acres located along the south side of Braun Court, east of Pilot Knob Road in the southwest 1/4 of section 15. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. There are no wetlands issues associated with this preliminary plat application. WATER DUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed single-family residential development lies just south of the western basin of Fish Lake in Drainage Basin J (Figure 1). One of the three lots included in the preliminary plat application already contains an existing house and driveway on approximately 3/4 of an acre. The other two lots are .5 and .7 acres, respectively and will contain less impervious surface and, therefore, generate less runoff per unit area than conventional single-family lots. Nevertheless, much of the runoff from this proposed development will drain directly to Fish Lake. The parcel is too small to accommodate a properly designed wet detention basin. Therefore, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is recommended to meet the water quality treatment requirements of the entire parcel, less the area of Lot 1 which was developed for single-family residential purposes prior to the effective date of the water quality ordinance. The cash dedication is estimated at $1,050. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the developer meet its water quality treatment requirements through the payment of cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding. There are no wetlands subject to jurisdiction under the Wetlands Conservation Act on the site. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/sb 3Avp:advis.328 /q. k?CR 0-0 FIGURE 1 C?.?V - -?? ati I I c HOO - • r 24" 17 PAS L.I1I W P- .2 R.L. a CL ? OH C-j SPERRY CP a coACH KS CCP 9. L.V1 PA C 11 ? u` m SI T HMA 1#&- 4 c GHLA CP-3 CL. VI ? ACH AN < FOX PARK UNISYS a RIOGa: ' ? ? ? P-1 NQ CL. A LA C-h A R? 3.a SURf?EY? iHN§dN CL. VI a•?eeN s? A ?`? :? PLAN H HTS' I I ' Lpp? C P -12 Lai yy `I? CL. VII R I V/ 2 ne Q`O I / 8L0G. ROY OAK CP-6 3le CI CL. VI 27' ?-- r ILL RA 0 4 R I CL. 8L )ITION _ Edl. ?EAQAW C -27D . VII P-5 I DP-4 V CL. V 14M E MCA 4 JX03D T 1?N C TOWN I NH 0 SEC)I CT CENTRE r 5'? FT - TH TOWN CE 70 FIRST ii JP-sf?. C -2 A" LOCATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT --? BP-1.2 CL. VII - W U JP- CITY CL. V PARK BL qlk. 27• HALL PARK to c V1 P-29.1 E VII P-2 _-s ?.4VIi? MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 SUBJECT: 3RD ADDITION - TACO BELL CORPORATION (CONSENT AGENDA ITEM) PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a restaurant planned on .98 acres and located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Cliff Lake Drive in the southeast one quarter of section 30 (Figure 1). The development is part of the overall Park Center Plan Development. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. WATER DUALITY ANALYSI This proposed development is located in drainage basin A and will generate run-off that will discharge to Pond AP-25, a 6-acre foot detention basin classified as a nutrient pond in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. There are no recreational water bodies directly downstream of AP-25. This proposed development is part of the Park Center Plan Development which has a total net developable area of approximately 19.2 acres. Pond AP-50 lies along the west edge of the plan development and was graded by the owners of the Park Center Plan Development to meet treatment requirements for the entire development, of which this parcel is a part. Analysis using the City's water quality model indicates that a pond having a volume of 2.6 acre feet and treating run-off from at least 19 acres of combined commercial and industrial and multi-family residential land uses would be needed to meet requirements for the Park Center Plan Development as a whole. As-built drawings for Pond AP-50 indicate that the net volume for the pond is approximately 2.6 acre feet and the drainage area is about 22.3 acres. That drainage area includes approximately 6k acres of the Park Center planned development area, as well as almost 16 acres of Cliff Road and commercial/special use property to the west and south of the pond. Because Pond AP-50 treats an equivalent area outside of the Park Center Plan Development but still within the same drainage, it is staff's judgment that the water quality treatment requirements for the entire plan development are met with AP-50. Therefore, no additional ponding or cash dedications are recommended for this development. c?z 3RD ADDITION - TACO BELL CORPORATION November 24, 1992 Page Two WETLANDS ISSUES This site was graded prior to the effective date of the Wetlands Conservation Act and consequently contains no wetlands subject to regulation under the Act. Thus, there are no wetlands issues associated with this parcel. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff finds that the water quality treatment requirements for the entire Park Center Plan Development have been met with the construction of Pond AP-50. Therefore, neither additional ponding requirements nor cash dedications are recommended. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/sb 30wp:advis2.329 OCA FIGURE 1 . VI N6 JUNIOR tib c C HIGH • CHOOL 2. LAN AP-4V- i TH CL. N EN -w 2 AP-35 • CL. V -x 1 I U ClWF-M 3f . ..N 1 r- L. AP-21.1 CL. V (7 vo AP- I CL.V ZN a ri 211 V1 L N ca Fu BI1? AP C L. - YARI `" AP- 9 AP 26 W ill -'Cft 12• I 7 et CL. III RAHN C V11 ?'9 = I LA C&l+I?E' CEM q1(J MME L 1 CL. I LE AP-50 V CL. VII OAK cou LOCATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPPtF.NT PLXr 01 1 / C L. V I o Anr KER,-7 K "1 I CL. VIPfi CL. V I f AP 17 EAG , OAKOTfCOUNTY PAF 2.A-yy - -xx 9LP- 1. CL. IV A-zz MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 1992 RE: PARKS DEDICATION FEES Background At the November meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, the issue of recommendation for parks dedication fees for the year 1993 was placed on the Commission's agenda. At that meeting, the Commission determined that it would like additional information pertaining to land values. Staff has identified several vacant parcels within the community. Those parcels were then researched as to their market value as determined by the Dakota County Assessor's Department. Below is the assessor's market value for each of these parcels. It should be noted that these parcels are zoned agricultural or as are part of a PUD and have an underlying zoning of agricultural. Recognizing that market values are likely to be less than actual sale values the Commission needs to consider that these land parcels are probably not reflective of actual sales. I doubt that any owners listed would sell the property for the dollar amount listed, therefore, Commission needs to look at these values with some caution. Discussion At the last Commission meeting, staff expressed some concern that this approach would be of limited value in deciding a definitive value for vacant land. Because of the many variables involved with these parcels; including last sale, topography, zoning, etc. It would appear that this information is inconclusive and may make the Commission's decision making all the more difficult and not easier. In the absence of a number of parcels that reflect land values based on recent sales, it may be appropriate for the Advisory Commission to stay with current values which were based on sales of property at the time they were established. There is at least some reliable basis for that number, and the Commission should take some comfort in it's being a reflective value of land sold. While several years old, it does have some basis for being used. c . In as much as there seems to be a lack of a preponderance of evidence to change value of the property upward; it may be reasonable for the city to stay with its current land values. Given that the Commission has already made a recommendation to secure professional services for establishing 1994 rates, it may be advisable that the Commission simply recommend continuation of the 1992 rates through 1993. For Commission Action To make a recommendation regarding land values for parks dedication purposes. KV/dj C O M1 KI S S IO NPA R KS D E D. ME M dh . LAND VALUES 94, v OWNER/LOCATION ZONED ASSESSED VALUE (HOUSE/BUILDINGS/LAND) SIZE/ACRE PRICE/ACRE 1 Agricultural $ 82,900.00 6.5 $12,754.00 2 Agricultural 58,900.00 2.5 23,560.00 3 Agricultural 269,600.00 37 7,286.00 4 Agricultural 91,900.00 50 1,532.00 5 Agricultural (Rezoned PD) 168,800.00 40 4,220.00 6 Agricultural 214,000.00 36 5,944.00 7 PD 512,600.00 28 13,489.00 8 PD 241,100.00 17 14,183.00, 9 R3 & R4 12,000.00 7 1,714.00 10 Agricultural Agricultural 25,400.00 14,700.00 38 40 668.00 367.00 COMMISSIONL ANDVAL. TBL LAND VALUES eti .?,. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1992 RE: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING EXPANSION OF FUNDING BY THE STATE AND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR ARTERIAL CONNECTION ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL Bac und: The Minnesota Valley River Trail has been identified as a major, multi-use trail by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State government and adjoining municipalities. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has assumed responsibility for ensuring the coordination of trail development through these various governmental entities. When completed, the trail will extend from Fort Snelling State Park to St. Peter, following the general alignment of the Minnesota River. Major sections of the trail are already complete and heavily utilized by bikers, cross country skiers, hikers and snowmobilers. The Commission may recall that the Department has submitted a grant application to the Metropolitan Council, seeking funds under the Federal Internodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) for federal funding for various trail development projects in Eagan. The Fort Snelling State Park Trail Access from Rahn Road, Beau-d-Rue Drive, and Silver Bell to Nichols Road is identified as the biggest priority in the city's ISTEA application. Staff recently attended a workshop with representatives from the Minneapolis Park Board, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MnDOT, Dakota County, MAC, and the Metropolitan Council. The purpose of the workshop was to identify missing links in the Minnesota River Valley Trail, and inter-agency connections for which acquisition is not funded or will require multi-agency coordination. Examples are: Minnehaha Park, the Bureau of Mines and Historic Fort Snelling, the United States Federal Building, the Polo Grounds and the City of Eagan via the Nichols Road trail and the 1494 River Crossing Trail. Also proposed is a trail extension access through the U.S. Air Force Small Arms Range to connect Fort Snelling Park proper to the Minnesota Valley Trail.. Those in attendance at the workshop were in agreement that the DNR's pursuit of funding oZq from the State Legislature and other networking entities by local governments would be enhanced by resolutions of support from the governing boards of coordinating agencies. For Commission Action: In consideration of this effort a draft resolution has been prepared for the Commission's consideration. If the Commission is in agreement with the resolution in support of funding for acquisition and construction of the Minnesota Valley Trail network, it is appropriate that a recommendation of support be forwarded to the City Council. DP/dj COMMISSIONMNTRRES.MEM Jo . RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA URGING THE EXPANSION OF FUNDING FOR ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL AND ARTERIAL CONNECTIONS WHEREAS, the Minnesota Valley Trail is a federal and state designated multi=use trail of major significance in the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has developed a Comprehensive Trail System Plan, the significance of which will be enhanced by the completion of the Minnesota Valley Trail, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Valley Trail will represent a significant state recreation trail connecting other major trail systems, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Valley Trail will compliment and enhance the City of Eagan's existing trail system by expanding direct trail access to other major trail systems, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Valley Trail will serve as a commuter route, connecting diverse local communities and creating alternative transportation modes to employment and recreation destinations, and WHEREAS, the existing Minnesota Valley Trail segments are used extensively by City of Eagan residents who bicycle, rollerblade, hike and cross country ski, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission urges the State of Minnesota and the Department of Natural Resources to acquire remaining necessary trail connections, place high priority on funding for completion of the Minnesota Valley Trail, and coordinate the effective networking of trails between affected public recreation trail providers in the Minnesota River Valley thereby improving the quality of life for present and future generations. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by and seconded by Ayes: Resolution unanimously adopted by the Eagan Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission the 3rd day of December, 1992. Chairperson Attest: DP/dj DIMM'ALLEY'ES C51. MEMORANDUM TO: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION FROM: JON OYANAGI, RECREATION SUPERVISOR DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 RE: SOFTBALL POLICY Background Prior to Eagan Parks and Recreation operating the adult softball league, they were run by the teams themselves via a committee. When the City assumed direction of the leagues, the League Leadership Committee was maintained as an advisory group to hear and recommend changes in rules, league offerings and policies. This committee is comprised of representatives from teams in the variety of men's, women's and co-recreational leagues. The City still maintains final authority in matters regarding facilities, league offerings and policies. Rules for league play are often implemented after committee approval without the need for review by the Commission or City Council. After the 1991 season, the League Leadership Committee made recommendations to expand the number of "outside" players (players that neither live or work full-time within Eagan) from three per team to five. In addition, a fee of $25.00 would have been imposed for the fourth and fifth players. The justification for expansion included: 1. Allowing teams to stay together in spite of players moving or changing jobs. 2. Neighboring communities of Burnsville and Apple Valley allow 49% of a team to consist of "outside" players. 3. Allowing two or more "outside" players would help teams build a more competitive team and therefore keep interest high and post-season advancement more attainable. 4. Building a new team in Eagan is difficult because so many people are new, making connecting more difficult. A more generous "outside" player limit would allow a base of friends to build a new team even though all were not local, and add other members from the Parks and Recreation available players list. 5. The women's program has been in decline and teams break up or drop out more frequently. Expanded eligibility would aid these teams to remain active and keep the women's program healthy. 3. 6. An expanded "outside" player policy would keep teams honest rather than looking for ways to cheat on their roster. The Advisory Commission, at the November 7, 1991 meeting, recommended that Parks and Recreation keep the limit at three and that we charge those three $25.00 each. The rationale was that since the leagues have grown and fields are almost at capacity, that eligibility should remain restrictive. After completing one season with the new "outside" player fee in place, an evaluation can be made. Of course, every team affected complained about the added fee. The majority feel Eagan is too restrictive. The revenue generated totalled over $6,000.00 translating to over 240 players. This represents approximately 7% of the 3,400 players rostered. The men's team total was 140 compared to 139 in 1991. The women's team total dropped two teams from the 27 1991 teams to 25. Co-recreational grew from 40 teams in 1991 to 53 in 1992. We turned away co-recreational teams, accommodated all of the men's teams and lost women's teams. Issue The League Leadership Committee has made recommendations for the 1993 season that effect policies regarding eligibility. They are: 1. Due to the decline of the women's program, the recommendation is to drop the $25.00 per outside player fee for women's teams only. In addition, expand the boundaries to include Mendota Heights, Apple Valley and Rosemount (cities without women's leagues). 2. Grandfather former Eagan players (live or work) if they have played in Eagan as a local player for at least 5 consecutive years with the same team. Teams with such players would pay a $25.00 fee but would not count them as one of the three allowed "outside" players. If a player skips a year or changes teams, they are no longer grandfathered. Discussion There were 31 women's teams in 1990, 27 in 1991 and 25 in 1992. There is concern for the women's program surviving. Apple Valley and Rosemount have failed to field a women's league during the past two seasons. It is the staffs opinion that women's softball is important to the residents of this area, offers choices for women athletes and satisfies an interest different than co-recreational softball. Anything Parks and Recreation can do to encourage participation rather than deter, should be implemented. The reasons for decline are not clear in a community where growth is present and young adults are plentiful. Co-recreational softball is growing rapidly and this contributes to the decline. Young adults beginning and raising families either need to cut back participation or eliminate softball temporarily. Co-recreational softball allows both spouses to participate and uses only one evening instead of two or three. Forming a consistent team roster every year grows difficult due to moves, job changes, pregnancies, injuries, etc., and a manager grows weary of fielding a team. The teams that tend to return are usually work related teams, competitive teams and teams from large neighborhood groups. The League Leadership Committee proposal to drop the "outside" player fee for women's teams and broadening the boundaries should help teams form, stay together and therefore keep the women's leagues vital. The second proposal of grandfathering players who have played together for at least five years seems reasonable and fair. Players receive benefit for living or working here for an extended period and still pay a fee towards the program for being outside the boundaries. Only teams together five years or more are eligible. The problem with this proposal is administrative. Entering 3500 rostered players from each of the last five years and future years simply is not cost effective. A computerized system is the only practical way to monitor this policy and the time to enter names would not be equal to the number of players that can utilize the rule. To do this by paper would not be effective or accurate and would rely on memory. Transfer of information from current staff to a new league director would be difficult by paper records. Work records are much harder to verify. If this proposal is accepted it would be the League Director's recommendation to limit it to residents only, not those who worked here for five years or more. For Commission Action It would be appropriate for the Advisory Commission to make a recommendation concerning this issue. JO/dj DISOFFBALL.POL MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 1992 RE: ST. THOMAS BECKETT/TRAIL DEDICATION FEES Back=and St. Thomas Beckett, the community church being developed adjacent to Highway 3, has previously been reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission in its preliminary plot review. At the time of that preliminary plat, the Commission recommended that parks dedication fees associated with the project be deferred until such time as the church should ever change land use and second, that the plat be subject to a cash trails dedication. The church is now requesting (see attached letter) credit be applied to the trails dedication amount for on site trail development. Issue The issue before the APRNR Commission is whether to extend credit against the trails dedication fee for St. Thomas Beckett Church. In a letter dated October 30, regarding the reduction in trail dedication fees, it is noted that an outlot will be created on property east of trunk Highway 3. This outlot, by definition, will not be subject to a trail dedication at this time. Therefore, the actual area being used for the church proper is a parcel of land approximately 17 acres in size. The trails dedication amount for this would be approximately $14,500.00. Attached is an exhibit showing trails additions on the church property. It is pointed out in their letter of October 30, those trails are not part of the city's comprehensive trails plan. The church is requesting, because these trails do provide an amenity to the city and could eventually connect to the city's trail system, credit be provided to the church to help offset a portion of the trails dedication fees. The church trail is 1,400 feet long and five feet wide. As an estimate for trails construction, staff usually projects $12.00 - $13.00 per lineal foot for 8' wide trails. 157 Discussion The existing trails dedication policy does not provide for credits if additional amenities are provided. However, it is within the prerogative of the Advisory Commission to recommend to the City Council action which it feels is justifiable. If the Commission were to do this, it would be more appropriate for the Commission to develop a policy which would not only cover this particular situation but other situations that may also arise. In the parks dedication policy, it is permissible for the Advisory Commission to recommend credits against a cash dedication requirement when the developer provides meaningful, on- site recreational amenities. This policy provides for up to 25% reduction when those amenities are provided and the Commission feels they are significant and appropriate. Historically, the Advisory Commission has not waivered from its trails dedication requirements, although policy has only been in effect for less than three years. The city has previously held steadfast to trails dedication requirements for churches, (there has been one) and schools. However, in neither case was a request made for trails dedication reduction based on trails within the development. Recently, the YMCA made a direct request to the City Council for reduction in its trails dedication based on ponding area. The City Council has deferred the item back to staff for the review; several Council members suggesting that a trails dedication reduction did not seem appropriate but would be willing to consider alternatives, provided there is some recreation use those credits could be exchanged for. For Commission Action It would be appropriate for the Advisory Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council; to require a trails dedication in its entirety, or a motion to extend a (specified amount) credit for internal trails against the trails dedication amount, determined. KV/dj COMMISSIONS T- TH O MS . ME M 'tea . fill SITE PLAN THE. CATHOUC COMMUNITY OF SAINT THOMAS BECKET EAGAN, MINNESOTA 3q. i?f? III m-k,filv- 30 October 1992 Mr. Ken Vraa Director of Parks & Recreation City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 RE: St. Thomas Becket Trail Dedication Fees Dear Mr. Vraa: As you may know the Catholic Community of St. Thomas Becket is in the process of preparing documents for Final Plat approval. A part of that process involves establishing the required city fees to be paid by the owner. We have been informed that the Trail Dedication Fees will be at $854/acre or $28,276 based on 33.11 acres of land. On October 13 we met with Tom Colbert to discuss the fees to be paid by The St. Thomas Becket Community. At that meeting it was decided that since there are no plans at present to develop the property east of T.H. No. 3 it would be called an outlot on the final plat. We also agreed to subtract out the area of our property to the west of T.H. No. 3 that is covered by water. This reduced the actual area to be used to assess fees to 16.98 acres. We feel that this is the acreage that should be used for determining the Trail Dedication Fees. We would St. Thoma With this beauty of Atlantic southwest area will access to like to note that one of the primary objectives for The Community of s Becket is to become a vital part of the surrounding neighborhoods. in mind a site plan is being developed that respects the natural the site and will provide trails along Hay Lake that will connect to Hills Drive, Tofte Lane, and the church. A picnic area near corner of the be designed to anyone wishing property at the lake, both the trail and the respect the natural beauty of the site and to use it. the picnic provide We realize that the trail It does however, provide to the city trail system. us in the construction of trail to offset an equal our primary objectives. BECKE1\LT103092.TC is not part of the city's comprehensive trail plan. an amenity to the city and could eventually connect With this in mind we feel that the city could assist the trail, by allowing us to use the cost of the portion of the Trail Dedication Fees we could achieve RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON ARCHITECTS 253 E 4TH STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 612 224 4831 We'd like to thank you in advance for your prompt and serious consideration given to our proposal. We are sure you'll agree that The Catholic Community of St. Thomas Becket has made every effort to work with the neighbors and the city to create a project that will be an asset to the community. Sincerely, RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON ARCHITECTS, INC. _?1NW'IWi , Thomas R. Cassid TRC/sjk xc: Fr. Tom Kommers, David Loehr, Lee Markell, Craig Rafferty, Mike Ridley, Charlie Melcher, Barb Alampi, File. BECKET\LT103092.TC 4/. 0 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1992 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON STATUS OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR THE PERMANENT PHASE OF THE WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT (WCA) The Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR) published the proposed permanent rules for the 1991 Wetlands Conservation Act on October 19, 1992. A public- comment period on the proposed rules will extend through at least December 22, 1992. The rules may or may not be revised based on public comment but will become effective no later than July 1, 1993 when the permanent program begins. As the Wetlands Task Force members of . the Commission will remember from our September 23 meeting, the rules are extensive and controversial. In an attempt to identify and explain the most significant issues that should be of concern to the City of Eagan I prepared the attached memo. I want to emphasize that while the memo may appear somewhat negative because of its focus on problem areas, we all strongly support the underlying tenants of the law and the rules which promote "no net loss" of wetlands and provide a strong local government role in administration. I will be happy to answer any questions the Commission has on this issue. Thanks. /,j,- IT"-- Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/nab 6b:aprnrc.332 TO: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: COORDINATION OF INPUT ON PROPOSED PERMANENT RULES FOR WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT. DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1992 Background As you'll recall, we met on November 2 to.discuss the proposed rules for the permanent program phase of the Wetlands Conservation Act. At that time, I alluded to several different provisions of both the Act and the proposed rules which I felt should be of concern to the City. One of the items we agreed on in that meeting was that I would do more work to outline the issues of concern on which we should consider commenting and investigate possibilities for coordinating our comments with others having similar concerns. Proposal for Comment Forum I have just returned from a morning meeting whose objective was to decide whether to form a public-private sector coalition made up of concerned cities, counties, watershed districts, water management organizations, property owners, and developers to participate in the rulemaking process for the permanent program of the WCA. If we are to participate in this coalition, we will have to commit between $750-$1,000 to help fund preparation of a position paper by the coalition that will presented at the public hearing on the rules on December 17, 1992. A working group of the coalition is developing a platform that outlines the general principles that will form the foundation for the coalition's work. The platform will be sent out for review sometime next week. I will need to provide some indication of our willingness to participate by Wednesday, November 25. If we are amenable to participation, I could condition our firm commitment of contributing funds on a review and acceptance of the coalition platform. While I still recommend submitting comments as a City and as part of the Gun Club Lake WMO, the general consensus is that a broad- based coalition such as the one proposed above stands the best chance of presenting common concerns that will result in changes in the rule. The same approach could be used to pursue changes in the statute over the long term, and the City could participate if we thought it appropriate. For the next month, however, the emphasis of the coalition would be to focus on convincing BWSR to make changes to the rule. 0 Major Issues With this proposal in mind, I would like to review a few of the major concerns I have with the proposed rules (and in some cases, the statute). Please keep in mind that the rule itself is 86 pages and that I am hitting only some of the major problem areas. Many of these concerns have been expressed by other entities and are para-phrased here. 1. Under the interim program, we had considerable discretion to tailor wetland replacement plans to complement our water quality program goals and meet the 1 acre for 1 acre replacement requirement under this phase. We did this by allowing constructed on-site detention basins for water quality-if constructed to NURP standards-to be used to also satisfy wetland replacement requirements. The ponds were generally constructed with a shallow bench to facilitate growth of emergent vegetation, then dropped off to the deeper water that performed most of the pollutant removal function. While it was difficult to mistake them for a natural wetland, the ponds were undeniably effective in performing water quality and flood control functions that natural wetlands perform in an urban environment. Under the permanent program, detention basins will not qualify for wetland replacement. The scientific basis for this position is unclear. I would argue that a properly designed detention basin is often more efficient at performing the primary functions of water quality treatment and flood control than many natural wetlands. The result will be that a developer or other property owner could be required to provide both an on-site treatment pond and wetland replacement on the same site. The result will be a further shrinkage in developable areas, with no apparent benefit to priority resources in many cases. 2. Even though the size, type, and location of wetlands affect their function and value differently, all wetlands are created equal in the eyes of the WCA. This simply does not make sense, especially in an urban environment. One key to the success of the City's water quality program is that the resources in question were classified and prioritized in the plan. This system clearly recognized that if not everything could be protected given growing population pressures, there were certain resources of high community value that were to be protected above all others. The Wetland Conservation Act doesn't allow for this, either on a local or state level. A 150 square foot, isolated, Type 1 wetland with virtually no functional value-must be replaced at a minimum 2 acres for one acre ratio. (It is interesting to note that Type 1 and 2 wetlands of any size on agricultural land are largely exempt from any regulation under the act because of the intense 2 lobbying by the agricultural groups during development of the legislation.) The best alternative to this is to allow local governments the latitude to develop their own wetland management plan that would contain an inventory and classification of resources and identify the management standards to be applied to each group. The plan would be reviewed and approved by a state oversight agency, provided it met some reasonable standards. The local government unit would then be free to administer it's own program according to the approved plan. Local governments who elect not to develop their own program would be subject by default to the over-all state program requirements. While it is unclear whether the problem is with the rule or the statute, The current framework does not allow for development and implementation of management plans or other forms of "customized", comprehensive wetland resource management at the local level. 3. The wetland banking provisions that are included in the rule are overly restrictive. Only restored-not created- wetlands are eligible for deposit in the "bank" to mitigate for wetland losses. In a rapidly growing city like Eagan, I would expect that the number of wetlands whose present condition and location lend themselves to restoration is minimal. (We'll be able to confirm whether this is the case with the inventory and classification currently underway.) With this and other provisions, the rule basically encourages the proliferation of numerous isolated wetlands that are difficult to properly manage instead of a few larger, high quality wetlands located to maximize their important functional values and which lend themselves to management as a unit. 4. Under the rules for the permanent phase of the program, a technical evaluation panel (TEP) composed of one BWSR staff member, one SWCD staff member, and an engineer from the local government unit must review and make a recommendation on all replacement plans. During the interim program, the technical evaluation panel was utilized only at the discretion of the LGU, such as when a particularly difficult technical issue arose. I have used the TEP twice during the interim period so far. I expect that the work load alone during the permanent program will make it very difficult for the TEP to review replacement plans in any sort of a timely manner. Since no wetland can be filled or drained until a replacement plan is public noticed and approved and the replacement wetland is in- place, unnecessary delays in public as well as private projects could be substantial. In addition, the requirement that the LGU representative be an engineer would prohibit a staff person like me from participating on the TEP. 5. The minimum replacement ratio for drained or filled urban 3 4 wetlands is 2 acres replacement wetland for every one acre of impacted wetland. For wetlands located on agricultural land, the replacement ratio is 1:1. There is no scientific rationale underlying these different requirements in the statute. 6. The law will be exceedingly complex and time-consuming to administer at the local level if anything but complete wetlands impact avoidance is practiced. There is some indication that groups who have exerted a major influence in drafting of the rules thus far have intentionally made wetland replacement so difficult that it is virtually impossible to complete within any sort of reasonable time frame. Because of the number and location of wetlands in Eagan, total avoidance will be virtually impossible and we will be faced with dealing with these onerous replacement provisions for public as well as private projects. Conclusion These are a few of the potential problems with the law and rules as I see them. Few people-including myself- disagree with the general "no net loss" concept or with local government involvement in administering this type of law. The problem is with the mechanics of the law and especially the rules, which are inflexible and appear to be heavily biased against urban interests. The Gun Club Lake WMO is currently compiling detailed comments on the rules and will submit those comments at the December 17 hearing. However, I think the City should seriously consider participation in the proposed coalition if we desire substantial changes in the rule to correct some of the deficiencies discussed above. I will contact you to set up a meeting early the week of November 23. I think it might be appropriate to include Tom Hedges, Tom Colbert, and John Hohenstein as well as you, John VonDeLinde and myself. Thanks. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator cc. John VonDeLinde 4 4-7. TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: STATUS OF WETLANDS INVENTORY/CLASSIFICATION EFFORT DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1992 As members of the Commissions Wetland Task Force will recall, we discussed the need to conduct a reconnaissance-level wetlands inventory of the City. The purpose of the inventory is to help our efforts in both administering the Wetlands Conservation. Act and in examining whether to pursue additional wetlands management and protection initiatives. The status of the effort is as follows: 1. Sent Request-for-Proposals (RFP) out to seven firms on October 2, 1992. Proposals were due October 21, 1992. 2. Six firms responded to RFP. After in-house review, we selected Frank Svoboda and Associates to conduct the work. Frank has done similar work for the City of Chanhassen, May Township, and several other local units of government. 3. Met with Frank Svoboda and Dakota County Land Information Director Gary Stevenson. Gary is directing a joint project between the City of Eagan and the County to develop a geographic information system (GIS) for Eagan that includes information on the location of wetlands in the City. Unfortunately, Gary does not have the time or the staff to complete incorporation of National Wetlands Inventory information into GIS, and Svoboda and Associates does not have the physical facilities to incorporate the data. Therefore, the City is looking into hiring a private contractor to complete this work. I'll have more information on the success of these efforts at the Commission meeting Thursday. 4. Outlined consultant's role after initial inventory work is done. Roles include identifying type of wetlands using both classification systems, assessing the accuracy of the GIS information through limited ground-truthing, identifying the degree of degradation and restorable wetlands in priority areas, and possibly locating `T( stormwater ponds that may have assumed wetland characteristics. We are currently developing a contract scope and cost for this work. The anticipated work should be completed by March 30, 1993. I plan on providing just a brief over-view Thursday's Commission meeting and will be additional information if desired. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator of these efforts at e happy to provide TO: PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1992 RE: POSSIBLE RECLASSIFICATION OF POND LP-47 Background At it's August, 1992 meeting, the Commission reviewed water quality and wetlands impact issues associated with the Thomas Beckett Church development, located near the east end of Hay Lake (Figure 1). To provide maximum protection to Hay Lake, staff recommended that an existing pond in the southeast corner of the site be enlarged to receive and treat stormwater runoff from the site. The Eagan stormwater comprehensive plan adopted by the City Council in 1990 also called for stormwater from the site to be conveyed off the Church property to the south into pond LP-47, a 1.8 acre Type 4 deep marsh, before discharge into Hay Lake (Figure 2). Discharge to LP-47 was considered desirable by staff to further remove pollutants before the water was introduced to Hay Lake, a recreationally classified water body. It was also considered consistent with the water quality plan classification of LP-47 as a nutrient basin. In addition, the Comp plan called for Pond LP-47 to receive runoff from the Curry property to the south of the Church property before that runoff is discharged to Hay Lake. In order to make possible gravity drainage from LP-47 to Hay Lake, the normal water level in both ponds needed to be raised. This would be expected to at least temporarily degrade much of the shrub, tree, and emergent vegetation around the edge of the wetland. A cursory examination of the LP-47 wetland indicates that it may come as close to a large, natural wetland largely unaffected by development as we have in the City. Staffs opinion is that it's value for aesthetics and wildlife habitat are significant inspite of the fact that it lies adjacent to Highway 3. In addition, creation of a two-cell pond as part of the Thomas Beckett Church development would decrease pollutant loading to Hay Lake to near acceptable levels, though not to the levels possible if the runoff was next routed to LP-47 before discharge to Hay Lake. Proposal Staff would like to discuss with the Commission the merits of protecting the wetland values associated with LP-47. Protection would involve preventing a significant alteration of the water level, trying to maintain the current water balance for the wetland, and preventing discharge of untreated stormwater to. the wetland now and in the future from both Church and other property. If the Commission would like to consider this proposal, staff will assemble a brief feasibility analysis that examines issues which need to be considered in making the decision and develop a recommendation for possible re-classification of the wetland. Specific issues to be addressed would be: a. The projected impact to water quality in Hay Lake of more directly discharging stormwater to Hay Lake from developed areas. b. Whether reasonable alternatives exist to direct stormwater away from LP-47 when the Curry property to the south develops and what the implications might be for the quality of other water'bodies. c. What, if any, plans MnDOT has to upgrade Highway 3 and how those plans could affect LP-47. d. How the property owner feels about working with the City to protect the wetland. Since the wetland lies on private land to the south of the Church property, the Commission may want to give the landowner a chance to comment on the proposal. Appropriate action could then be taken at the January 1993 Commission meeting. Rich Brasch Water Resour ces Coordinator JP-23 FIGURE 1 CL. V 36 [ CLV L JP-251 N 53 JP-25?? CL. V Co T Y V \ GENII L.S. - I • L.; V L. V 9 ?o•. sF• o uJT CHURCH AUDITOR'S 3 0. 00.42 2 7 S 1 V JP-68 JP-52 CL. IV CL. V DO FARM . PT CL. V LP-6 1.1 THOMAS BECKE TT CHURCH DEVELOPMENT - VI SC? LA F v II,, ?+ W /2r PA MER ACE MTS. s: L , I P- 7 -30 CL. V I I C A ) CL Vi -29 L. 11 4P-45 CL. 11 • ?' 12 f.. CL. IV L. 11 LP-24 l2• "sk ~ ?' CL. I LP-27 rs„ • '9 CL IV t y LP-119 ORON, CL.1 - in ? I Z P-22 CL. I -23 V = LP-66 CL. IV I'- '7 • Ll?a7T+-EaMr4-i- I 1 FIGTJRE 2 I , 13 8 n GATE VALVE (TYP) ; f 8` ?x1 CUL t VATE3 f # f'! #{ f ;;M-75 J • E 8' W.M. tel. 11 1 ?.. 0 100 200 SCALE IN. FEET !• S ?Y '"\ \V :y??:*':,::1::::.?.?.`;•?,?:!:rf:'::::?. ?: / t• i i s E i s \ ` .•?: -Ij 'YD ANT & VALVE (TYP) f { '{#`? `? z CHURCH POND ? ; ? ?r • • ` SOUTH BOUNDARY-THOMAS BECKETT CHURCH __ • ' ?? . ? _. ? ?t? {; t ! ? ? LEGEND % 1111 ! POND HWL ELEY HWL ET .ACK f i CURRY PROPERTY ` • LP-47 WETLAND PROPOSED STORM SEWER & WATERMAIN FILE I ST. THOMAS BECKET CHURCH 9314. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. NO. ENCMEERS 8 ARCNlfECTS PLANNERS 2 ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS DECEMBER 1992 1.*« The Eagan Seniors Group held its first meeting in the Community Room at Eagan Woods this week. Forty- eight seniors, approximately half from the community and half from the senior housing complex, attended. Intermingling occurred, so staff is encouraged by this first encounter. If anything, the Senior's Group wondered, to staff, whether the residents would "join" the group. So -we just gave them all name tags and welcomed them to the Eagan Seniors Group! 2. The winter "Discover Us!" brochure is at the printer. Registration for skating lessons, cross country ski lessons, Tiny Tots, the Bandy School, speedskating and much more, begins on December 12. 3.*1K The staff will begin the implementation of new registration procedures at the December 12 session. The system is similar in concept to bank tellers. Several people can be helped at one time. The system requires more staff but is perceived to be more user friendly. The plan is to have all "bugs" worked out before the May mass registrations for summer programs. 4.*« Staff attended the MRPA fall conference in Rochester. The conference was well attended. Networking with fellow professionals and the opportunity to attend an array of education sessions are always the highlight of the conference. 5. *1K Now that preparation of the winter brochure is behind us, flyers for teen activities can be made ready to send to the student representatives on the Recreation Sub-Committee. 6.*« Staff will be meeting with the Eagan Hockey Association age coordinators to review Department maintenance procedures, Winter Recreation Leaders responsibilities, and procedures to reserve ice time. Staff has held this meeting for several years and find that the expectations of coaches more closely match the Department's service capabilities. 7. *,K NYSCA coaches clinics were held for ice ringettes. Fourteen coaches were certified. Ringette is the smallest participant sport for which certification clinics are run. r 8.*« Staff has begun preliminary work with School District #196 concerning ball fields for 1993. The quality of turf at Dakota Hills Middle School and Pinewood Elementary are of particular concern, however, youth programs cannot be managed unless both facilities are available for use by the community. 9.*« Recent Eagan Athletic Association board elections resulted in most incumbents staying on board. The only sport without a director at this point is fall in-house soccer. 10.*« The new Dakota Civic Theatre postponed its premier opening of a the "Fantastics". The delay was for only two weeks and was necessitated by construction glitches with lighting and seating. Volunteer labor is doing much of the work. 11.*« A receiver and amplifier were attached to the outdoor speaker at Clearwater Park. This will be in place to provide skaters with background music, allow for public address announcements, and provide music for pairs skating lessons. A locked cupboard, constructed by Steve Hadden, will safely house these components. 12.*« Interviews are nearly complete for the approximately 30 Winter Recreation Leader positions that will staff the twelve warming shelters. Staff training will take place December 15 - 17 with a targeted opening date of December 18, weather permitting. 13.*« Registration is currently underway for Men's Broomball, Co-Rec Broomball, 4-Man Hockey, and Boot Hockey. Those seasons begin later in December. 14.*« Fall Tiny Tots classes are ending the week of November 30. Past activities included a Thanksgiving feast day where each child brought an apple, orange, raisins or similar items and the children observed how when everyone shares, a feast is made. A program was also held for the parents to hear and see some activities the children have learned during the past 10 weeks. 15.*K Winter volleyball registrations are currently being accepted. As of November 30, 67 teams have registered. Leagues offered are men's officiated, women's officiated, co-ed officiated, and co-ed recreational. 16.*« The North Pole calling program will be held for the seventh year on December 9 and 10, from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Volunteers are still needed to call children and given them an opportunity to talk to Santa. Volunteers always come away with a story and a few laughs to share. 17.*« All regulation soccer goals were scraped and repainted prior to winter storage. Many thanks to seasonal park maintenance employees Jean Martin and Matt Freeland for completion of this tedious and time consuming task. 18.*« All of the shelter buildings were inspected and minor repairs completed as needed prior to the winter season's heavy use of these facilities. 19.*,, An additional rail was installed on the Blackhawk boardwalk to address potential safety concerns. Steve Hadden and Alex Lammers completed this task. 20.*« The new Thomas Lake cross country ski trail was signed in preparation for the skiing season. 21.*« A sound system was installed at Clearwater Park to enhance the experience of pleasure skaters at this popular site. 22.*« All tennis court and athletic field fencing was inspected and repaired in November in order to get a head start on the busy spring season. 23.*« The conversion of maintenance equipment to winter operations (installation of cabs, brooms, snowblowers, etc.) was completed in November. Dan Curtin and Steve Taylor took the lead on this project. 24.*u Fall topdressing of selected athletic field sites was completed in November. 25.*. All winter skating facilities were inspected and repaired as required. This included the hockey rink boards, rink lighting, fencing, and hockey goals. All the rinks are ready for flooding, as soon as sufficient frost and cold weather arrives. 26.*« A City-wide inventory and repair of the City's 253 picnic tables was conducted in November. Approximately 12 tables had new seats or tops installed. 27.*« Park Operations Supervisor Richard Pelletier has been elected president of the Minnesota Park Supervisors Association for 1994. We congratulate Rich on this achievement and recognition by his peers and wish him the best of success in this endeavor! 28.*« Final preparations were made for the upcoming tubing season at Trapp Farm Park. The temporary fence was installed and all tubes have been readied. 29.*« Parks Superintendent John VonDeLinde was awarded the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association Presidential Award at the 1992 Annual conference for his work in developing and editing MRPA's new long- range Strategic Plan. *City Council - December 15, 1992 *Commission - December 3, 1992 DP/dj COMMISSIONHAPPI292. a. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION FR DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1992 RE: COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING - C.O.P. Issue There is no immediate action requested on this item by the Commission. This item is provided for informational purposes. Background Department staff has been attending Community Oriented Policing Committee meetings for several months. Personnel from the Police Department, Planning and Administration are serving on the Committee which is addressing a change in the approach to providing police services. Rona Sampson from the Police Executive Research Forum, based in Washington, D. C., conducted an all-day workshop in June. The purpose of the workshop and committee meetings has been to foster an understanding of the concept of community oriented policing - C.O.P. - and to identify how best to implement the philosophy in the City of Eagan. Basically, the concept involves: • Identifying neighborhoods • Creating neighborhood advisory groups • Orienting and training police officers in the C.O.P. philosophy which takes officers out of their patrol cars for a portion of their shifts. • Police officers would visit with businesses, youth or work on solving problems that are identified in their sector during the non-patrol time. • Solutions to problems will be hopefully identified through interaction with the community. .§-7. Community Oriented Policing November 25, 1992 Page 2 The Police Department has divided the city into four (4) beats or quadrants. Each beat has a mixture of single family, multiple, commercial and industrial development. Police sergeants assigned to each beat are currently forming advisory group for that beat area. The first meetings of the Advisory Committees will be held in January. Representation on the advisory groups will be diverse. Training for police officers in the C.O.P. philosophy will begin within the next six to eight weeks. Articles have already appeared in local newspapers concerning Community Oriented Policing, informing the public about the city's new direction for policing. Issues Parks and Recreation's role in Community Oriented Policing is only generally defined at this time. Ultimately, it is likely that a request for recreational activity for a specific neighborhood or a specific group will occur if it is seen as a solution to a problem. In addition to administrative issues such as who requests programs, from whom and how, other basic issues have been identified and included. What can Parks and Recreation actually do? What is the relationship between Parks and Recreation and Community Oriented Policing? Are there specific examples of what Parks and Recreation can do? Discussion Recreation staff is pleased to be a part of this "problem-solving" approach to neighborhood problems and hopes to play a role when called upon. The bottom line that ultimately controls what Parks and Recreation can do is the budget. The Recreation budget does not currently include a Community Oriented Policing program. Until the Police Department begins operating under the C.O.P. philosophy, an unknown factor is how frequently a recreation activity or support program will be identified as a portion of a solution to a problem. Closely aligned to budget is staffing. It is not known what skills a recreation leader will be required to have to effectively reach potential program participants. The wrong role model in any particular situation may negate the opportunity for success. Community Oriented Policing November 25, 1992 Page 3 The relationship between Parks and Recreation and Community Oriented Policing has not yet been defined, but is expected to be clarified as time goes on. It is assumed that Recreation will be asked to respond to program park requests although no specifics have been identified. Establishing lines of communication guidelines for evaluation of program requests, prioritization seems important at this juncture. The goal would be to maintain an open, yet objective perspective. The Police Department has requested that Parks and Recreation provide examples of the types of programs that could be done. Staff's opinion is that the neighborhood advisory committees are more likely to request a specific activity rather than turn to Recreation and say "do something." A brainstormed list of possible requests would be a starting point. Staff could then evaluate what resources are needed for each activity, including neighborhood volunteers. An additional aspect for consideration is that the neighborhood committees might request park amenities for isolated neighborhoods. This may make a response more difficult. For Commission Action No action is requested on this item. Staff is providing this information for background purposes recognizing the Commission will want to be involved and may want to provide additional direction. DP/nh N1/copapprc.nwn (. IV_ SUBJECT: PLANNED. DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PARK CENTER 3RD ADDITION) APPLICANT: TACO BELL CORPORATION LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1M DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 16,1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting an Amendment to the Park Center Planned Development, a Preliminary Plat of Outlot E, Park Center Addition, consisting of one lot and one outlot on .98 acres, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Class II restaurant, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The Park Center Planned Development Agreement made on August 15, 1989 designated specific uses for Outlots B through E as follows: Outlot B - a 4,800 sq. ft. bank; Outlot C - a free-standing 6,000 sq. ft. retail business; Outlot D - an 86,600 sq. ft. retail strip center, and Outlot E - a 4,500 sq. ft. Class I restaurant. To date, no development has occurred on any of these outlots. The Planned Development sketch plan and conditions are attached. BACKGROUND: The Park Center Addition Final Plat was approved by the City Council on September 18, 1990. On April 16, 1991 Outlot A, Park Center Addition, was final platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Park Center 2nd Addition, to develop the senior housing site. The senior housing site is not included in the Park Center Planned Development. COMMENTS: The Park Center Planned Development designated Outlot E to be developed with a Class I (traditional sit-down) restaurant. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Planned Development to allow a Class II (fast-food) restaurant at this location. SITE PLAN: Access to the site will be from Cliff Lake Road approximately 450' north of Cliff Road. An ingress/egress easement will allow the access drive to be built across Outlot D. Analysis of this access is difficult prior to Outlot D being developed. The plan calls for a 1,989 sq. ft. brick building including a drive-thru window and 39 on-site parking spaces; the drive-thru aisle will accommodate seven vehicle stacking spaces that will not interfere with any other internal traffic circulation. All building, parking, and drive aisle setback ?of. requirements are met. A brick trash/recycling enclosure will be attached to the north side of the building and all rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from ground level Dakota County is requiring a 15' highway easement and restricted access along Cliff Road. This will require the entire site to shift 15' to the north to meet setback requirements. SIGNAGE: A condition of the Park Center Planned Development Agreement required an overall pylon sign plan. This sign plan was executed on September 18, 1990 and provides for a pylon sign on Outlot E (site 1). The applicant is proposing a pylon sign supported by two brick columns. The sign meets all Sign Code requirements. Due to berming and landscaping along Cliff Road, the pylon sign will be located approximately 50' off the east property line and 10' off the south property line. The building elevations provided show building signage on all four sides of the building. This is not consistent with the City's Sign Code which allows building signage of not more than 20% on all sides of a building facing a major street. The building signage proposed for the west and north building elevations is not allowed. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The revised landscape plan provides a mixture of overstory, understory, and coniferous trees that will provide year-round color. Landscaped berming will be required along the southern property line. 64- DING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing terrain of the site is fairly flat with no trees. A minimal amount of grading will be needed to prepare this site for development. The preliminary grading plan shows construction of a berm along the southerly property line to provide a buffer to Cliff Road, Dakota County Road 32. The maximum cuts on this site are 2 feet and the maximum fills are 5 feet. The preliminary drainage plan shows constructing an internal storm sewer system that will drain this development northerly to a publicly maintained storm sewer system. The public storm sewer line shall be constructed to the north along the west side of Cliff Lake Road and connect to an existing 27" storm sewer stub located approximately 500 feet north of this development. The plans approved with the final plat application shall include detailed plans and specifications that will show the construction of the proposed storm sewer across Outlot D of Park Center Addition. The drainage of the proposed parking lot shall slope to the concrete curb and gutter and then to the proposed storm sewer and this should eliminate bituminous swales in the proposed parking lots and drive aisles. The storm sewer system that will drain this site drains to Pond AP-25 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. Pond AP-25 is a sedimentation basin located 800 feet north of this lot along the west side of Cliff Lake Road. This development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. WATER DUALITY: This proposed development is located in drainage basin A and will generate runoff that will discharge to Pond AP-25, a 1.3 acre 6 acre-foot detention basin classified as a nutrient pond in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. There are no recreational waterbodies directly downstream of Pond AP-25. This proposed development is part of the Park Center PUD which has a total net developable area of approximately 19.2 acres. Pond AP-50 lies along the west edge of the PUD and was graded by the owners of the Park Center PUD to meet treatment requirements for the entire development, of which this parcel is a part. Analysis using the City's water quality model indicates that a pond having a volume of 2.6 acre-feet and treating runoff from at least 19 acres of combined commercial/industrial and multifamily residential would be needed to meet requirements for the Park Center PUD as a whole. As-built drawings for Pond AP-50 indicate that the wet volume for the pond is approximately 2.6 acre-feet and the drainage area is about 223 acres. It is staffs judgement that the water quality treatment requirements for the entire PUD are met with this pond. Therefore, no additional ponding or cash dedications will be recommended. The site was graded prior to the effective date of the Wetlands Conservation Act. Consequently, there are no wetland issues associated with this parcel. These recommendations are subject to approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. 63 UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity has been provided to this lot from an existing 18" sanitary sewer along Cliff Road. An existing 6" DIP sewer service that connects to the existing 18" sanitary sewer is available with an invert elevation of 908.5. The final utility plan shall include a manhole at the connection to the 6" sewer service stub. Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 6" watermain along the west edge of Cliff Lake Road. The 6" water main has been stubbed to this property and the preliminary utility plan shows extending the water main to the proposed building. A hydrant shall be added on the 6" water main as shown on the preliminary utility plan to add additional fire protection to this site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access for the proposed development will be provided from Cliff Lake Road which is along the east property line of the site. No access is being proposed to Cliff Road which is along the south property line of the site. The preliminary site plan shows constructing a private street from this site to the north for 300 feet and connect to an existing street opening on Cliff Lake Road. The existing street opening on Cliff Lake Road is an opening with turn lanes and has a full median opening but it is not an intersection with traffic signals. The final plans submitted with the final plat application shall include detailed plans of the private road extension from this lot up to Cliff Lake Road. The proposed parking lot for this development shall be constructed with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. The preliminary site plan shows temporary bituminous curb to be constructed along the west and north edges of the parking lot and this temporary bituminous curb will be removed when the parking lot expands as development occurs on Outlot D of Park Center Addition. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development will be responsible for dedicating a drainage and utility easement over the proposed storm sewer that will be constructed in Outlot D of the Park Center Addition from this lot and heading in a northerly direction along the west side of Cliff Lake Road. The developer will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, MN Dept. of Health, Dakota County, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. 64. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Park Center 3rd Based upon the study of the financial obligations Collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are Computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Availability C/I $2470/Ac .96 Ac $2371 Charge Storm Sewer C/I .035/sq ft 41,909 sq ft 1,467 Trunk Lateral Benefit C/I 17.25/ff 269.13 £f 4,642 Sanitary Sewer Total &S. PARK-CENTER _.?,.. _ EXHIBIT B: DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SKETCH PLAN) ' H i+??/innnnt, 1 - =4 lost$ II II! lei i I i is S W 1" .1111. PARK CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D: CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, and 01. Execution of the final plat by the City, for the property or any portion thereof, shall be evidence that these conditions have been complied with as they relate to the property or portion thereof which is platted, except that this provision shall not apply to any portion of the property which is platted as an outlet. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a time specified by the city Council. - execution of this Planned Development shall satisfy this condition. 3. A determination for the elderly housing site shall be made either on this site,or on another location. - execution of Option Agreement shall satisfy this request. 4. A Pylon Sign Agreement shall be entered into. 5. Each lot shall be reviewed in detail by the APC and City Council before building permits are issued. 6. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible from the public streets. 7. The parking along the east end of the strip center shall be removed. 8. Special emphasis will be placed on screening rear side of the strip center from Rahn Park. 9. Cross easements shall be provided for the parking lot servicing Sites 1 and 2. 10. All trash shall be contained within the buildings or in enclosures attached to the building and constructed of the same materials. 11. Berming shall be provided along the public streets. 12. This development is required to provide approximately 4-6 acre feet of wet pond storage volume below the proposed normal water level for Pond AP-50. This condition will be fulfilled by the grading of Pond AP-50 by the City pursuant to a public improvement project in accordance with the grading specifications and area which have been promulgated by the city. 13. This development shall comply with all requirements of he County Highway Department pertaining to the proposed accesses co Cliff Road. 67. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CONDITIONS 1. An amended Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into prior to Final Plat. 2. All pylon signs shall be constructed with the same style • two 20"x20" brick columns. PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS FOR PARK CENTER 3RD ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, C1, C2, C4, CS, Dl, El, Fl, G1, and H1. 2. All signage shall meet Sign Code requirements and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. Elevations shall be revised removing building signage from the north and west sides. 3. The building shall be constructed of brick. 4. The trash/recycling container shall be made of brick and attached to the building. 5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from ground level. 6. Underground irrigation is required for all landscaped and green areas. 7. Dakota County highway easement will require the entire site to shift 15' to the north to meet setback requirements. & The plans approved with the final plat shall include the construction of the proposed storm sewer and private street across Outlot D of Park Center Addition. 9. The final utility plan shall include a manhole at the connection to the existing 6" sewer service stub. 10. Utility and access easements are required across Outlot D, Park Center Addition. tP?• . STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Basements and Right -of-*av 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 69. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall- be submitted on thef proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Tmflroves ert¦ 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication, requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Duality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. N. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall *be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 100 1990 plataprv.cot LTS 02 10. LOCATION ZONING tow CA I CIS GUIDE PLAN ws ?s jo+ do PF 04 u ° a u I/ 71. C i E!t i^ & IE 4' t • ;.a €idi. : 2 si S •: : a 9 •} ' ? it :r @ . . !? f3:f ig3 ? ! = x '72-. I (? 1 I CU,c r -? ZOM[D CSC' r T?? \\ I I I 1 . 1 1 1 1€ x g _ ?i?? c # la • -2____ =f foil {? t :j . fill ?11?1?1;1111tflllll??p =! jl? f?tlIi }p?ttl??l I I "r' t!' Ji? ,i?j??iitj?` a? ??j e?l?f' I:t'i?Iil??'? `#7 1-??j?f ..... _ . iI i :???1; Fill[ I IIItF?i t? 1 1 ?•?? ?? ?EZaE'? I xr a qj. 1,IIIy= A t 111'a t'?;ti i ?i?'i ?tYF?F{•{1 ?jl ji??f?! • ?!=j?j•???Ei?? f SWIG 4 , 1!?ill ,f CLIFF LAKE ROAD D r TA 0 BELL I; :w 06M. MI a N 1 111 ITEM SITE P1 AN s,- ter- st pill s, ic' ?-cN?OO• f I CUFF LAKE ROAD '! l! j i b E I i '3 TACO BELIEF i AGA LAM 0. LANDSCAPE PLAN i! o1 a j?' a . ,' T ? looo pit q. ill jig pr s1 ! Ii_. ! J f 11! f .VACANT. --! I 0 ¦? y m T??RO& CLFF LAKE RD. DRMNAGE & UTIUTIES PLAN r--- -- 01 11 0 z rn 1:0 s z a °° is •.?i?{+ a ?{ , ?i ?i1 a j { j I ii! i I F" 2 $ fit i ii Its 1 1 j r r^ rn m 1 ! i i rn Y .4 m i 1 { ?• , sE 2 j' Z pOy 1 o ! i ••! / 2 1 w M / 1 I ?•? M { g 2 , ! N N 1 ~ I ' O ;Rf lJ?j I E F I IM • M r G ? N N MM a 7 , Y ? ;?t m 1 TACO BELL CUF RD. s CUFF LAKE RD. A AN MILAN TA I - V ' 10 Y ?l I I I i l r..r u ! EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ar J n Cl? Li L) Li a- I #_1 Of 1 ? E dtb I kF. p \ . :o"co csc' Nnr I I I r ! In- 011- 141 w L It s.t i t=ti S !_ ! Ifi I• r j I f -1 at. H pr i fic 1 1* _ :Es i'Q 3s iE o p ? -sss? z aE s =lis y?. mmmmm ?g?9- 426 AP-51;, ?, ? 1: ? it tiZ ! 'E'L1T:; ? 1 HH9g2 j ?• °816.3 frs+' R, - P 'I939 AP-ft j: •t ?. ; . :i jL;. ?? 887.5 ii il' ..• : ? ? ?? ? {_' ` - ... ,;?. :! f j 4 '• r it ?; A.7 FJ4 4. A tai ;_ ;,fit _! r u ip_ 893:!??' 9/19163 e.` 1 ?: :A 6-S 1 t ;, + 1T 60-10 t782i,4 9040 "` 54 .P BO l_, 900. ?? ;p• 09.8 A-od 15 t2• fH• ?. r 16.0 ??9-21 I APg-26 'fN+? ;h.;•fi? ,?.2 7p%O't? 'f?rrt N B9B.5 t$?' `.. / ? t•..s?` ??-? ..•;+i . Ap- gg I A-CC •916.0 ; . as'' I 9 --' fs. j A =23 ,', t• !f?' 'm •i 420o. i s T•' r t?: r-? 889.3 ' SITE j . i t rgg = -pp AP-If 9 I r f6' i.X'AP .1 90 0 _ 1. _ • I_ `? cf ' i, 904A • AFB-25 _ p. Z !880:05 LE -50 886.0P-?2 r 54 892.0 is~ A-ft Aida BP-311 00 p.f- Cc) AP .- 3709 900.0 ..t 08. 08.2 J(i••?? '•?' -?`? , ); .8?r32' ;, 933.9. \\. rzrAAg0-4gg4 A=H:?.. ??c;9. e . 937,9 _.'`•' ` a•,. Lt i t ;'1 !t li+e : ? r: 9J96 ?` , t? ?:` t ` A-vv A049 ', r t2 ?e, iti! .;, ?,... 38. I 9/9.0. ' P-16 ly-1 . A $ .., •.s!+?; ?' -_ 920 94.0: /S.O 92.4.3 ea:. P.? AP-30 +'-% P `f ?? •'' ; ;922.4 irT?,'":s `? AP f;.f.....?...?•._.:.P!_: 49 ; 926.2 911.0 ,.. 8.s; -18 Ap-3?.1 9/3.5 925.5 927.01 qP'44 9313 sB? .92901 4. yf926.0 r r : ? e? ., 940.0 ?- -' r f • 8LP-59 A_99 ? '' 902.0 d2? . k . 893.3 '9942 `. ...A-yy 900.0 AP-33 [ 980pp Aib .33.1 993 i :, 1006.0• 1,0/0.0 -- A? - rr??¦ty,? J , . _ .. A-:: FIGURE No. 17 NORTH STORM SEWER LAYOUT fttl?,p MAP ... lez> STONY LiT STATION hd b, . . . . . . . . . - SIONII LST STATION inAewm . . . . . . . 0 CITY. OF n«w.a"M?.I ::::::::::: ?...?..? am" ?',?//A POND NONYAL wATEN LEVEL . ... .. . . 900.0 POW $USH WATEN LEVEL . . . . . . . sQp-p ==_= E A G A N I / • oVENLAlO oNAUAaE FM TE . SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: HENRY BRAUN LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAM LY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24,1992 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 16, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for three single family lots located along the east side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Wescott Road. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The zoning surrounding the proposed plat . is Planned Development single family on the east and south, Agriculture to the south, and R-1 single family to the west and north. The City's current Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates the area as D-1, Single Family (0-3 units/acre). There is an existing home on Lot 1, Block 1, which will remain. BACKGROUND: In 1980 Braun Sunrise Addition was platted. The four lot subdivision is located west of Drexel Court, south of Braun Court, and east of Pilot Knob Road. Lot 1, (the largest of the lots at 101,564 sq. ft.) is what is currently being proposed to be subdivided into Braun Sunrise 2nd Addition. In 1988 the applicant received a Waiver of Plat, acquiring an 837 sq. ft. triangular portion of property from Lot 2 of Braun Sunrise Addition. In exchange, the north property line of Lot 2 was modified to include a 5' strip of property (835 sq. ft.). This explains the unusual east property line configuration. COMMENTS: The proposed three lot plat is located on Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Braun Sunrise Addition. Lot 2 slopes down from Braun Court and from the west property line. The rear portion of Lot 2 and the westerly property line are wooded with the north one- third of the lot being grassy. The single family lots range in area from 23,164 sq. ft. to 34,996 sq. ft., exceeding the 12,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, will take access from Braun Court. Lot 3, Block 1 (a flag lot), is proposing to take access from Pilot Knob Road. This lot does not meet the minimum 50' lot frontage requirement along Pilot Knob Road. A Variance of 20' shall be required. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading that will be required for the proposed two new houses will be done on an individual lot basis with the building permit. The preliminary plat submittal did not include a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing the amount of disturbance that the proposed houses will have on the existing woods and terrain of the area. The applicant did submit a layout that shows the approximate locations of the proposed houses and the elevations of the houses. No grading is proposed to be done on Lot 1 where the existing house is located. The house on Lot 2 is proposed to be built in an existing low area that is drained by a 12" R.C.P. culvert that drains across Braun Court and into Fish Lake, Pond JP-4, which is a designated ponding area on the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, The low area on Lot 2 does not have an emergency overland spillway until the water would build up high enough to cross Braun Court which is at elevation 864. The proposed house on Lot 2 shall be constructed 3 feet above the freeboard elevation of the 100-year high water level of the low area on Lot 2. Preliminary calculations show that the high water level of the low area during a 100-year event will reach elevation 860. Therefore, the minimum lowest entry level for the house on Lot 2 shall be at elevation 863. The location of the house on Lot 2 will require fill.to be placed in the low area to construct the proposed driveway and house. The fill will require the extension of the existing 12" storm sewer that drains the low area. Also, the fill will require the removal of some trees that provide a nice buffer along the west side of the lot. The construction of the house on Lot 2 shall allow the drainage to be maintained across Lot 2 to the existing storm sewer system that drains this area of 2.8 acres. The proposed house on Lot 3 is shown to be located on the east end of the lot and is proposed to have a long driveway to Pilot Knob Road. The construction of the house and driveway will require the removal of a number of trees that are located on this lot. The driveway out to Pilot Knob Road will require a culvert under the driveway to convey the drainage from the property to the south of Lot 3 to be conveyed in a northerly direction. Since this development drains directly to Fish Lake, the proposed house builder shall take special care in preventing erosion from these proposed houses. A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on all disturbed areas that will control soil erosion within 15 days after the final grade is established. In the interim basis, soil stabilization measures such as silt fence or bay bales shall be installed to protect the soil from washing into the existing storm sewer system. WATER QUALITY: Much of the runoff from this proposed development will drain directly to Fish Lake. However, the parcel is too small to accommodate a properly designed wet detention basin. Therefore, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding will be recommended to meet the water quality treatment requirements. The cash dedication for this parcel is based on the area of the entire parcel less the area of Block 1 which is already developed for single family residential purposes. The cash dedication is estimated at $1,050. 0.t There are no wetland issues associated with this development. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES The existing house on Lot 1 is currently served by City sanitary sewer and water. The proposed house on Lot 2 has sewer and water services stubbed to it from Braun Court. The proposed house on Lot 3 has an existing 1" water service stubbed to it from Pilot Knob Road. The preliminary utility plan submitted by the applicant shows providing sanitary sewer service to Lot 3 by constructing the sewer service to the south through the properties in the Drexel Heights Addition. City records show that there is an existing 8" line approximately 70 feet south of Lot 3 with an invert elevation of 883.5. The developer shall obtain an easement from the property owners to the south to construct sanitary sewer service to the existing 8" line. Also, the proposed house on Lot 3 shall be raised up to allow gravity service to work to serve the proposed house. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the existing house on Lot 1 and to proposed Lot 2 is provided from Braun Court which is a 30' wide public street. Braun Court connects to Drexel Court and loops to the south and east to Wescott Road. Access to Lot 3 is proposed to be provided from an existing driveway opening off of Pilot Knob Road, Dakota County Highway 31. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the County that will allow this driveway to connect to Pilot Knob Road. The City received a letter on November 9, 1992, from Dakota County that stated no access will be allowed to Pilot Knob Road. The proposed driveway for the house on Lot 3 is shown to be approximately 280 feet long. RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate all right-of- way and easements necessary for Braun Court. The City currently has a street easement deed for Braun Court. However, the plat shall also dedicate right-of-way over this street easement for Braun Court. Also a 20' drainage easement shall be dedicated across Lot 2 to provide for the drainage that runs in a northerly direction across Lot 2 to the existing storm sewer by Braun Court. The developer will be responsible for obtaining the permits to construct the driveway and culvert along Pilot Knob Road for Lot 3 from Dakota County. Also, the developer will be responsible for obtaining the easements to the south for the sanitary sewer service for Lot 3. VI-I 0 -A FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Braun Sunrise 2nd • Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. ' The charges are computed the using City s existing fee schedule and connections pro posed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit S.F. 17.25/ff 100 if $1,775 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit S.F. 1530/ff 100 if 1,530 Water Storm Sewer S.F. 069/sq if 51,887 sq ft 3.580 Trunk Total UMS DR CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,D1,El,F1,G1,andHI 2. A Variance for Lot 3, Block 1, to allow 30' street frontage. 3. The proposed house on Lot 2 shall be constructed 3' above the 100-year high water level of the low area on Lot 2. 4. The construction of the house and driveway on Lot 2 shall allow the drainage to be maintained across Lot 2 to the existing 12" storm sewer system. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining an easement from the property to the south of Lot 3 to construct sanitary sewer service through the adjacent property. 6. The proposed house on Lot 3 shall be raised up to allow gravity sanitary sewer service to serve the proposed house. 7. A 20' drainage easement shall be dedicated across Lot 2 to provide for the drainage that flows across the lot. 8. The proposed access to Pilot Knob Road for the Lot 3 restriction imposed by the County must be resolved prior to Final Plat. 9. The development is required to maintain existing drainage patterns along Pilot Knob Road if the County allows access for proposed Lot 3. ?S BTANDARD CONDITIONS OP PLAT APPROVAL A. financial Oblicatiens 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's. report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Basements an Rivhts-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered. over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with'City engineering standards. STA?:DARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Tzrrovementa 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. pater Ouality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water-Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1. All standard platting and Zoning conditions shali'be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planaing Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 Revised: plataprv.con LTS #2 City Council September 15, 1987 July 10, 1990 941 01. r_ Its. nNW1, `.? cr i ` 4< ,- IS .1 of A . r ?! 9 91 V 0.51 r t r ILI- f]tttt Or r. Sir- - .. r -fill f.l l r 11rt10T ADD. Z r ?, •~ fir 9 +? ``` ??t • , null •? ?.h? ... ? 7 ? `iii Fq. dire Administration IS CIA V / liw rj ??•?' - st.a}asasvs tt?c:.zss •r '- . z16;hsa:411-as16r1664491" City Hall PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION aft 1 ..: ' f IIwa,,'! 1./w: i t ?t00'!1'!!? 1 Nt./O . , ' BRAUN R COURT ! f:..rs>r.•r i? Iter ; ? l?s 7 \ `•7 f / 2 t i t 4 ' 1 z , , I ?.b . . tot ii a$.J. A f, I i d*., .,&a Z x I A AW `? K I : M1M N.-rrr1. 0"o," , r r,1 I / ll of Ft .09 _CCC f / Of _ I /Ir 1Y 1 I a F %M-r' I s set' t.-It\.a..re t/e1, NAIl, pee/ts• 7r• •TtrY.t /u.prieeoldo". Ab... I •r, S. /1Mt New cost f+ww. ,11 fS271 te•. 111-N7r O.e.1M l:.. I... I em Ni' e! l.A 1. a.., 1 OMt. /..wfl" On-IT". -t e.a. • s! A. -ea •t fol.. ...w a r.?.1 for.. f te1.M•e R:. 1•. 1..1 7 I/.l,m a•. Is. Ln 7 M.M.; ss. ft. e•.... 17.%• r1. it. 4/rtra ewA P,..,.....' 10-toe, O.1 Saw/.- tel.. ..•?1.1..... u• ?t117tr t. Ya S. wwA b; c1/7 esMlar7 Omar. O ,.,. es .tells Oe.er. •P,.leee we $Mtelld or wellMle. f... sale wei/e. f. NA,. M/et took 11004 rt•6t e! aM r /Or..d earl M Omer WIN O/,ttir pp., re. ?. tan f bw so erl.Ile+ r•wh e.11 Iwr ec./... e.. ?11e1 es?l. I.em a •rr pr•r/eeo epeettr.u.. P.ee...i N. l mar M. fo..w• 1K+1 te?e.tr..e, kw.. II, •. 5mntl tt-•..r1 frost •%4" A..w+.;,:."A Sri. ert. M. teetwN it.. MArr 16. *M7 70 • RECEIVc nr I ! i DrLMAR H. $CHWANZ ellllNMMtlmem Are ewllell.r, l/a e? NI.s?lNp to a•6t• ral , • •e.rrr OW. a•• ?slrlw. ¦. PREUM/NARY PLAT OF: BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION Lcl 1.4 1 .` i s ' % It n ..afff OW I r %tA,U•.^-se• I..1 lrewr ?Lt• MA.M !aawta' 1'r• ••wr?a.altaal • &ftmots a a.- f P•..aa ago, Mara coot t Mr., to 11f7t /N. IN•s?ft 1tse. /fa e..as Ir» I art MH a• 1M t. P1... 1 taaaei f.M I!N aaa•t11A, •». •, w• lu ty.. :•rw, e•aa, ff.. , 9a1.•.ss et. t•. {•» I t1.IM 4.. It. I.» a b.P••: s.. It. 4-• a :t.M•r.. ••. t'..» If.?•7 rt. .. 4ln sea 4M4 P1.ww..• tawlae: P-1 atwt• a_... r«/A...aa• COURT ' I SULS$ WKS 1 1 1 , ' ic ? i i71't )•' I 3 .s I•.t FINANCIAL OBLIGATION LEGEND 0mummm Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer • • • • 6 Lateral Benefit Water Storm Sewer Trunk Mtetie• I. Mea Ie aaeoal a, ever aeaIe.,v arael. ant-6. 00• Stem Meer. P'?elrra are I.8la11a/ M ..altar/.. a. U. she •llat. I. true Plvet fi times Heat W.- Ag: M r twta.a awe I. a.a.ay .war Pr.r•M patmaare. I. M 7 M am volt IIm, rues. M tar RECENw: ::7 I ! or, a..a... t.. el/at S. taM r /aim tara•aa•: .I.rew_ss. PreP aN. M Iw /rlaa• U. ilwae- 20-0 Owaq.wa, 9-. q A Iety &me% P.1-,, 1ra11 . `w"" • an 1'tt•• ,l t DELMAR N. CCI4WANZ e . It a1 IN ..? ? 'r'te atat• N. e.er.rollust Mwl.. N. on" tltMlaa .. ?... ra0Mluetart /awapwr.arrataretalM taanM, l1?MtM1f tPaIV A,t 7 18'. 7-1 c' DP-20 0-i 9 ~ }` 901.0 I = ;r . ??!'• ?. ,. ??-., ??O-85.0 f k904 .... .. - 682.2 ,, 829 7 ?, . i?-ate 897.6 ! 4 i. 8842 ,? ,?- ?' 1` \P-22 : JP-66 89 .0 a: . STLO 5.J9 J-Li I+, i t 2 '?- JP•3 -' P=.? P 21: 6440 JPI?T.I 8.7 893.0 /2 a 846.5 1 876.0 dP-6 89/.1 8958 . p-2. 844,0 !j. 880A t::..;':4 +.t ::i JP•52.1 SITE f 851.5 Flt. !? ? " Ft ;:JP^15 i' IP- 7 `? deb , '?` 900.0. 440 849.2 7 8465 ?d85fb t6` .?, J-c 12• 8l5-I.f ; 88JP-4 A- JP-il +_. 821.0 5 825.0 46 * `?ir.. 615.7 830.0 ip- 823.8 J-b 1 6 44 !.;' Na 834.0 8P-2? 1 792. / 801.0 P-29 •' 809.7: - ? ? •• or B 8/8.0 -26 B-b 862.6 868.0 3P-3 189.9 1052 jp-e 18.9 8 830.0 ^-. 48 B-b .JP-36 870.6 'JP-3$ JP-3T g 873.2 OCn e 672.0 ', .-876.0, 21.1•, 07 FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF GZ. EAGAN 819. Nyi f 1. 6 NORTH PONDINI MEA.. •-?- *TOPIM 0 11.. . ...... : ._---- .TONM LWT STATION fedgeo . . . . . . STOW LET STATION ? O t . . . . . .TORN FORCE ININ a ."DR O ? ? ? -??•? POND NORMAL, WATER LEVEL . . . .. . . 900.0 FOND NO" WATER LEVEL . soo.o OVERLAND ORAJ IIOE RpITE ... . . . . . . n=== _ ___ S •' JP-10 820.8 830.0 830.0 tJP-35.1 ': 864.8 JP-7;;"' 872.7.' 858.4 r,r -i r '? ?rl :I DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEY & LAND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE GARY H. STEVENSON, R.L.S. COUNTY SURVEYOR LAND INFORMATION DIRECTOR (612) 891-7087 FAX(612)891-7031 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 55124-8579 November 9, 1992 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55112 ATT: Jim Sturm, City Planner BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION Dear Mr. Sturm: The Dakota County Plat Commission met on November 9, 1992, to consider the preliminary plat of BRAUN SUNRISE 2ND ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to C.S.A.H. NO. 31 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The Plat Commission does not recommend approval of this plat as no access to C.S.A.H. NO. 31 will be allowed. The ordinance requires resubmittal of the final plat before the recommendation of approval is made to the County Board. No work shall commence in the County's right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department. Sin ereiy, • ary H. Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director Secretary, Plat Commission cc: Delmar Schwanz, Land Surveyor Tom Swanson, Permits Technician Tom Colbert, Public Works Director e. Prinud on Recyekd Paper b='f bL_ whamf AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER