The URL can be used to link to this page

03/10/1993 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Wednesday, March 10, 1993 7:30 PM Eagan Municipal Center A. 7:30 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance C. Introduction of New Members D. Approval of Agenda E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 4, 1993 F. Visitors to be Heard H. Consent Agenda I. Development Proposals (1) Diffley Commons 2nd Addition - The Rottlund Co. (2) Galaxie Cliff Plaza 3rd Addition - Lifetime Fitness (3) Four Crowns,inc. DBA Wendy's j. Old Business (1) Park Naming (2) Scope of Services - Park System Plan Update, Appoint Interview Committee K. New Business (1) Summer Playground Program Update (2) Wading Pool (3) Update on Dog Runs (4) Trail Request Petition (5) Peridot Path Park L. Parks Development (1) Lexington Diffley Neighborhood Meeting Update M. Water Quality (1) Pond BP-4 Construction Update N. Other Business and Reports (1) Set Workshop Meeting Dates (2) Demographic Update - Dan Schultz (3) Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Update (4) Minnesota Valley Trail Update (5) Department Happenings 0. Round Table P. Adjournment MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 4, 1993 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 4, 1993 with the following Commission members present: Erin Ipsen-Borgersen, Jonathan Widem, Lee Markell, Deborah Johnson and Dan Mooradian. Commission Members not present included Ted Billy, Kevin Knight and Jack Johnson. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Rich Brasch, Water Quality Coordinator,Tom Schuster, City Forester; Paula Nowariak, Recreation Supervisor; Dan Schultz, Intern and Cherryl Mesko,Secretary. AGENDA Director Vraa noted that there were three miscellaneous items to be included under Other Business and Reports. Erin Ipsen-Borgersen moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 1993 Dan Mooradian moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes of January 7, 1993 as presented. CONSENT AGENDA After review of the park and trail dedication issues by Park Planner Stephen Sullivan and review of the water quality issues by Water Resources Coordinator Rich Brasch, Lee Markell moved,Erin Ipsen-Borgersen seconded the motion to make the following park/trail dedication recommendations to the City Counc i l regarding Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition. All members voted in favor. 1. Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition. It was noted that the parks dedication requirement has been fulfilled in accordance with the Winkler Jackson Planned Development. The Planned Development Agreement is specific to the developers responsibility to install a bituminous trail along the east side of Slater Road from Cliff Road to Slater Acres Park. Therefore, the parcel's location west of Slater Road is not responsible for trail construction or a cash trails dedication. The developer is responsible for submitting a tree protection plan for City review and approval prior to final plat. Erin lpsen-Borgersen moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following water quality dedication recommendations to the City Council regarding Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition. 1. Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition. The proposed development be required to provide a pond on site to treat stormwater runoff from the southern portion of the site. The treatment pond design should be subject to staff approval and have a wet pond volume of at least .7 acre-feet and a minimum average depth of 3 feet. A. sump should be excavated just off the flared end of the storm sewer entering Pond AP-10 from the North. Finally, filling or draining of Pond AP-10 or the adjacent wetland is prohibited. 3. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 meeting Page 2 PONDVIEW TOWNHOMES - GOOD VALUE HOMES Parks Planner Sullivan introduced this item noting that the parcel is within Parks Service Area #21 which is currently not served with a public park. With the platting of Deerwood Middle School the Commission reviewed the parkland need within this PSA and recommended that the need be determined once the land use was designated for the 80 acre parcel of land located at Diffley and 35E. The Commission further commented that the updating of the Comprehensive Parks System Plan may also provide the needed evaluation for PSA #21. Steve noted that the vegetative cover of the site is primarily small, secondary growth covering a majority of the parcel. The larger boxelders and elms that line the western pond edge are proposed to be preserved with development. The plans propose the removal of a 48' cottonwood tree on the northwest corner of the site and Steve suggested that some thought be given to preserving this tree. The final issue Mr. Sullivan reviewed was relative to the City Code provision for Recreation Open Space within all multiple family developments. Based on the City Code requirements, the 32 proposed units would equate to 6800 square feet of recreation open space required for this plat. Steve added that there is adequate green space adjacent to the unit central to the site to accommodate the open space required. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch reviewed the water quality requirements as well as the wetland protection issues relative to this proposal. Rich noted that the proposed development is located in drainage basin J with the runoff from the development being discharged to pond JP-3, a 10 acre wetland classified as a sediment basin directly connected with Fish Lake. Relative to wetland impact, Mr. Brasch noted that adjacent to the DNR protected wetland is a fringe wetland which was delineated throughout the development site by a consultant hired by the developer. The developer proposed to fill approximately 230 square feet of this fringe wetland to allow placement of two townhouse units in the northern portion of the site between the noise reduction berm along Highway 35E on the west and the wetland on the east side. The developer has indicated that failure to fill this area would result in the loss of four building units and a loss of approximately $400,000 in revenue. Rich continued that the mitigation area proposed would be excavated to the elevation of the existing wetland fringe to create a substrate and gradient that would allow sedges in the fringe to expand. It was also noted that the replacement would be supervised by a qualified contractor. A representative of Good Value Homes addressed the Commission noting that they agree with Steve and Rich's review of the issues as well as their recommendations. He did note, however, that it may be difficult to preserve the cottonwood tree as requested but the developer would make every effort to try to accommodate that request as well. After further discussion, Dan Mooradian moved, Erin Ipsen-Borgersen seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following parks/trails dedication recommendations to the City Council: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. The developer revise the grades adjacent to the central unit providing a minimum of 6800 square feet of flat recreation open space. 4. The developer provide staff with a tree protection plan prior to final plat which locates fencing to protect significant trees during the construction time frame. 4. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 3 5. The site plan preserve the trees adjacent to the single family home providing the area a buffer between the adjacent differing land uses. 6. The site plan preserve the trees adjacent to the pond. 7. The developer attempt to preserve the 48" cottonwood once the site plan is changed. Jonathan Widem moved, Erin Ipsen-Borgersen seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following water quality/wetland dedication recommendations to the City Council: 1. The proposed development be required to provide a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding to meet water quality treatment requirements. 2. Excavated sumps of at least 80 cubic yards should be created at the end of each storm water pipe entering the wetland from the development. 3. The cash dedication will be reduced commensurately to provide a credit for the area and volume of these sumps. 4. Because of the small area of fill proposed and the steps that the developer has taken to minimize filling, the proposed wetland replacement plan should be approved as proposed. DEERHAWK ADDITION - DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Parks Planner Sullivan introduced this item as an application requesting the preliminary plat of six single family lots on 2.42 acres locate south of Deerwood Drive and east of Blackhawk Drive. Steve continued that the Commission has reviewed this proposal previously and recommended a cash parks and trails dedication, however there are some water quality issues that remain to be reviewed by the Commission. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch explained that the Commission previously reviewed this development in September, 1992 when the developer was proposing to subdivide the parcel into five lots instead of six, as is now proposed. The Commission previously recommended a cash dedication to satisfy waterquality which should be adjusted upward slightlyto accountforthe increased impervious area associated with the addition of an extra lot. Relative to the wetland issues, Rich continued that the Commission authorized filling of up to 1500 feet of a wetland on the site, provided the filled wetland area was replaced on the site at a ratio of at least 1:1 to meet the requirements of the state Wetlands conservation Act. This was recommended to avoid destruction of a number of mature oak trees toward the rear of Lot 3, which would have occurred if the house pad had been moved to completely avoid wetlands impacts. The recommendation was also predicated on the existence of adequate space in the northwest corner of the site to expand the existing wetland to the west to meet replacement requirements. Rich continued that field reconnaissance of the site by City staff indicated that the wetland on the site may be significantly larger than the one designated on the original site plan. With this change, Rich indicated there is some question whether there will be adequate space on the site to replace the filled wetland area without impacting the current site plan. Gary Fuchs, representing Dakota County State Bank noted that they are in agreement with staff's recommendations and understand the need to identify the exact size of the wetland so that they can proceed with this project. .5 . Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 4 Lee Markel) asked if the wetland could be made to look more natural rather than trying to "jam" it into the corner of the site. Mr. Fuchs asked that the Commission consider giving Rich Brasch the discretionary option to determine the shape of the wetland in working with the owner of this site. Mr. Fuchs also asked the Commission to consider increasing the wetland fill area from 1500 to 2800 square feet. As a point of clarification, Mr. Brasch noted that a site is exempt from the Wetlands Conservation Act if the wetland is a result of a public improvement project as was the case with Blackhawk and Deerwood Roads After further discussion Erin Ipsen-Borgersen moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following parks/trails recommendations to the City Council: 1. The proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. The proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. Erin Ipsen-Borgersen moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following water quality/wetland recommendations to the City Council: 1. Authorize the proponent to fill up to 2800 square feet of the wetland contingent on submission and approval of the delineation findings and a replacement plan after preliminary plat but prior to approval of the final plat. The actual configuration of the wetland is to be worked out between the proponent and Mr. Brasch. LEXINGTON SQUARE "RELEAF" GRANT PROJECT Director Vraa introduced this item as an update on the status of the Minnesota Releaf Grant recently awarded to the City by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The $4,000 grant is intended to fund an innovative project of tree planting for energy conservation on a neighborhood level basis. Parks Superintendent VonDeLinde reiterated that the Lexington Square subdivision had been selected for this project and under the provisions of the grant each homeowner in Lexington Square will be asked to plant two tree seedlings, along with Tubex tree shelters in strategic locations in their yard to promote energy conservation. The seedlings and tree shelters will be provided free to the homeowners. It is expected that a preliminary mailing to the Lexington Square neighborhood will occur on February 1st describing the benefits of tree planting and energy conservation along with an overview of the Minnesota Releaf Program. A follow up mailing is expected to reach homeowners by March 15th spelling out the steps for individual participation in this project. Residents will be asked to fill out the sketch sheet showing the proposed planting site and species in relation to the placement of the house on the lot and return that sketch to the Forestry Division by April 1st. The third letter will then be sent, once planting stock is available, providing residents with planting and tree care instruction and informing them when and where their trees and Tubex shelters can be picked up. Following the planting process, City Forester Schuster noted that the growth of these trees will be monitored to determine the effectiveness of this reforestation project. It is expected that after 3-4 years there will be sufficient data to report back to the Department of Natural Resources. Lee Markell complimented staff on the excellent job they've done in empowering citizens in a project of this magnitude. Lee asked if other cities were participating in a program such as this. Tom Schuster responded that this was one of the first of it's kind and fits very well into the guidelines of the Minnesota Releaf Program which is geared primarily toward energy conservation. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4, 1993 Meeting Page 5 John VonDeLinde concluded that there are 370 households in the Lexington Square addition and there are enough trees to provide two per household. Staff is hoping for a high percentage of participation. PARK NAMING Director Vraa asked that this item be deferred to the March Commission meeting. GOLF DRIVING RANGE UPDATE Director Vraa explained that the City Council has reviewed this request and has asked staff to continue with the process of working out an agreement with Mr. Kuchera and Mr. Helgeson regarding the use of Lexington/Diffley for a golf driving range. Ken continued that one of the issues that remain is access to the site which will need to be worked out. Director Vraa noted that electrical service can be brought in from the U.S. West building but the water line for irrigation needs to be resolved. Ken concluded that the Council appreciated the Commission's input. STRUCTURING THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Director Vraa introduced this item noting that the City Council had postponed appointing new Commission members pending the discussion by the Commission as to the feasibility of restructuring this body. Ken explained that there were a large number of applicants who has expressed an interest in serving on the Advisory Commission and the Council was attempting to determine how best to use the resources of the individuals who had applied. Ken outlined some options the Commission may want to consider including 1) leaving the Commission as it currently exists; 2) expanding the Commission to a greater number; 3) restructuring the Commission duties and provide for two separate and distinct commissions-Parks and Recreation and Natural Resources; 4) restructuring the Advisory Commission to include a sub-committee of non-Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission members with the sole purpose of reviewing environmental issues. Director Vraa reviewed with the Commission the background resulting in the Commission's name being changed from Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission to Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. He also included the Mission Statement drafted by George Kubik in 1990 relative to the issues that would be discussed by the Advisory Commission concerning the preservation and enhancement of the natural resources of the City of Eagan. The Mission Statement was approved by the Advisory Commission and later referenced when the City Council was asked to consider renaming the Commission which they did. Ken continued that the City Council is now asking for input from the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission as to how they would like to see the Commission proceed. Lee Markell thanked Ken for the thorough job in defining the background and options for the Commission to consider. Dan Mooradian added that the memorandums and Mission Statement clearly outline the important issues at hand. Dan continued that his personal sense was that by splitting the commission into two separate entities the level of discussion on a single issue would multiply drastically. He added that another commission would add yet another layer for developers to get through before proceeding to the City Council. Mr. Mooradian expressed his support for increasing the number of Commission members feeling that this option would allow for more community involvement while maintaining the continuity of the overlapping issues that are addressed by the current Commission. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 6 Jonathan Widem concurred with Mr. Mooradian's comments adding that the issues addressed by the Commission are so closely inter-related that it would be difficult to separate parks and recreation issues from natural resources issues. Jonathan continued that since there is such a good working relationship with developers that adding another layer of commission review seemed unnecessary. Mr. Widem did acknowledge, however, the importance of utilizing the expertise of those residents who have expressed an interest in the APRNRC. Mr.Widem suggested expanding the Commission to 10 members. Erin Ipsen-Borgersen indicated she first thought the addition of a sub-committee of non-Advisory Commission members would be the best option to include more people in the discussion process, however she indicated she is leaning more toward increasing the number of participants on the Commission to ten. Deborah Johnson expressed her concern for adding too many people either through expansion of the size of the Commission or additional sub-committee members because of the potential for "over discussing" issues. She cautioned that by adding too many people, the Commission could find itself in a situation where issues got "bogged down" with discussion making it difficult to make decisions in a timely fashion. Dan Mooradian reiterated his suggestion to add Commission members in an attempt to ensure that there would be enough participating members at all times to conduct business. Erin lpsen-Borgersen added the importance of having a quorum at all meetings in order to effectively resolve the issues this Commission has been given charge of. Lee Markell suggested that consideration be given to both adding Commission Members and empowering citizens by inviting them to participate on subcommittees. Dan thought this may be a workable compromise to which Erin agreed. Lee continued that a "grass roots" approach to including those citizens who had expressed an interest in participating would be beneficial in the long run. After further discussion, Jonathan Widem moved, Erin lpsen-Borgersen seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend to the City Council that the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission be increased to eight (8) members and one (1) alternate and that a Citizen's Sub-committee of up to 5 members be appointed to aid the Commission on issues it deems appropriate. Director Vraa reiterated that this was the largest number of people to apply for the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Council wanted to see if there was a way in which to include all the areas of expertise represented by these individuals. Dan Mooradian suggested that input could be solicited from those interested individuals to determine what their interests are and to see how the Commission can use their expertise. SCOPE OF SERVICES - PARK SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Director Vraa introduced this item as the Scope of Services that will be sent to consultants regarding the update of the Park System Plan. The procedure that is anticipated includes the Scope of Services being sent, a follow-up proposer's meeting for interested bidders, written responses reviewed, interviews, recommendation to the City Council and the hiring of a consultant. Ken continued that he wanted the Commission to be aware of how extensive this project will be. He also added that there is no budget at this time but it is anticipated that the project may be bid in the $40,000-55,000 range. Lee Markell asked if the Council is obligated to take the low bid. Mr. Vraa responded that the Council has the option of selecting the consultant they feel is most appropriate for this project. Mr. Markell asked if staff is looking for volunteers for the interview committee and Mr. Vraa responded that this will be addressed at the March Commission meeting once the new members are in attendance. Q', Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 7 LANDSCAPE, TREE PRESERVATION AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT POLICIES Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde introduced this item indicating that a series of changes to the City's "post-development" landscape and tree maintenance ordinances were recommended by the Commission in 1990 and adopted by the City Council. These included an updating of the City's shade tree disease ordinances, the adoption of a new ordinance governing turf establishment and erosion control on newly developed lots and a new program for allowing the planting of trees within public road right-of-way areas under a permit system administered by the Forestry Division. John continued that as a result of the Landscape Committee's work, three draft environmental policies have been developed. One is new landscaping regulations under Chapter 11 (Land Use Regulations) of the City Code, another is new regulations governing lawn establishment and maintenance under Chapter 10 (Public Protection) of the City Code and the third is a new tree preservation and replacement policy which is a free standing policy but not an ordinance. After reviewing some items addressed within the new landscape ordinance John explained that the ordinance, which was adopted by the Advisory Commission, has also been ratified by the City Council. Mr. VonDeLinde then reviewed the proposed Turfgrass Establishment and Maintenance Ordinance noting that it would be appropriate for the Commission to approve, modify or deny the proposed final draft before forwarding it on to the City Council. Tree preservation and replacement policy was the next item reviewed by Mr. VonDeLinde. John explained that the City does not currently have a specific ordinance, policy or guideline which addresses standards for the preservation and/or replacement of trees within new developments or building sites. John added that to date, most tree preservation initiatives have been worked out between developers, builders and staff through a negotiation process. At this point staff is requesting input from the Commission before proceeding with the tree preservation and replacement policy. Erin Ipsen-Borgersen asked that Item C -1c be clarified. Dan Mooradian asked if the intention of the tree replacement policy was to provide an incentive for developers to preserve trees. John responded that that was the catalyst for this policy. Deborah Johnson asked how often developers do not comply with tree preservation. Steve Sullivan responded that developers have become more aware of the City's desire for tree preservation and been more pro-active in this regard. In some instances, Steve continued, developers have done lot by lot grading which preserves more trees than mass grading. It is hope that this policy will help to preserve even more trees as well as find an equitable way in which to provide for tree replacement should mass grading be necessary on a site. After further discussion, Erin lpsen-Borgersen moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend to the City Council that the proposed final draft of the Turfgrass Establishment and Maintenance Ordinance be ratified. Lee Markell asked if further comments from the Commission could be forwarded to John VonDeLinde regarding the tree preservation and replacement policy. John indicated the Commission's input would be appreciated and staff would bring this issue back to them in March or April. SAND VOLLEYBALL COURTS - GOAT HILL PARK Director Vraa introduced Recreation Supervisor Paula Nowariak who would be presenting a concept plan to allow for sand volleyball courts within Goat Hill Park hockey rinks. r Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 8 Recreation Supervisor Nowariak explained that due to the popularity of sand volleyball in the community, staff has looked at the expansion possibilities for this sport. Currently there is not room to expand at Rahn Athletic because of softball usage, parking limitations and the heave usage by public groups. Staff looked into adding sand volleyball courts at Northview Athletic but didn't propose this site because the space that is available would be better used for other amenities for the park. A site at Eagan High was viewed and determined to be too small and neighborhood parks in which space might be available lacked sufficient parking for sand volleyball activity. After some research it was determined that a viable option would be to place sand volleyball within an existing hockey rink. It was felt that Goat Hill Park would accommodate groups, picnics, leagues and casual use for sand volleyball. Paula then reviewed several options that had been designed with cost estimates for installation. The proposed plan would be to bring in approximately 10-12" of sand which would be removed in winter to accommodate flooding of the rinks. The removal and use of the sand pre-winter for use by maintenance for road sanding is being researched as well. After discussion of the options available, Lee Markell moved, Erin Ipsen-Borgersen seconded with all members voting in favorto recommend Option D with double courts and no edging in one hockey rink located in Goat Hill Park WATER QUALITY UPDATE Director Vraa indicated that Water Resources Coordinator Brasch would like to have a Watershed Management member named from the Commission which would meet every other month. Ken suggested that once the new Commission members are appointed then this appointment could be made. ADA UPDATE Superintendent of Recreation Peterson reviewed the status of the City's implementation of ADA requirements. Dorothy noted that city facilities, including park shelter buildings, parking lots and other ancillary park elements were evaluated for accessibility in 1992 and a limited number of barriers were identified at that time. Part two of the ADA accessibility assessment has also been completed and at issue is barriers to participation in city programs. As an update of recreation programs Dorothy indicated that a brainstorming format worked well. Dorothy noted that because of the diverse variety of recreation programs offered through Parks and Recreation the Office of Revenue Sharing rules require that not all of the City's programs be accessible, but when viewed in their entirety are accessible and usable by persons with disabilities. This would constitute affording equal opportunity to persons with disabilities. MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL UPDATE Superintendent of Recreation Peterson introduced this item as a joint effort of DNR, Minneapolis Park Board, Mendota Heights and Eagan to discuss trail connections with the repair/replacement of the Mendota Bridge. Dorothy indicated that meetings had occurred, and will continue to occur, to see how the agencies involved can tie together with a trail system. There may a possibility that ISTEA grant dollars may become available for a program such as this which would tie community to community. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Dorothy Peterson shared a video of recreation programs that have occurred during the winter session to give the Commission an overview of programs and use levels within the parks. The video included programs such as bandy at the Lexington/Diffley site, mite hockey tournament at Rahn and tubing at Trapp Farm Park. Ken Vraa noted that the attendance at the skating rinks and tubing hill has been excellent this year. Adult programs highlighted included the snow softball tournament and boot hockey tournament. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of February 4,1993 Meeting Page 9 John VonDeLinde acknowledged the anonymous contribution of producing the 1993 Arbor Day poster for distribution in the elementary schools, in installation of winter lake aeration systems at Fish and Schwanz Lakes and the fact that Berkley Risk Services is using Trapp Farm Park as a model of an ideal tubing facility when discussing this facility with other communities wanting to provide this program. ROUND TABLE Director Vraa brought the Commission's attention to two letters received by the Department. The first was a letter requesting the use of a fenced field at Goat Hill Park for the purposes of running/exercising a dog. Staff responded to Ms. Fredrickson's request indicating that they would not be able to accommodate her request. The second letter was from Mr. Wayne Huot, Eagan Traveling Soccer, asking that the City consider initiating a per team fee for field maintenance in 1994 rather than 1993 to allow them time to budget for it. Ken also commented that a neighborhood meeting regarding the Lexington/Diffley site would be held on February 18 and invited Commission Members to attend. Finally, Mr. Vraa addressed the letter of resignation from Steve Sullivan. Ken expressed the Department's regret in losing Steve but the position he has accepted with Dakota County Parks is a good opportunity for him. Ken added that Steve will be deeply missed. Steve addressed the Commission and thanked them for having given him the opportunity to participate is such a positive nurturing environment. Steve reviewed some of the highlights of his nine years with the City noting that in that time frame 30 parks had been developed, 6 parks had been acquired,and he has worked on public contracts totaling over $5,000,000. Steve continued praising the Department's cooperative team spirit and Ken's leadership that facilitated that type of working environment. Steve thanked the Commission for their commitment to the Eagan Parks System and their understanding of the value for having a landscape architect on staff. Although it is difficult to leave, Steve concluded that working for the City of Eagan has been a wonderful learning/working experience and he felt confident that he was leaving the Parks and Recreation Department in good hands. Deborah Johnson commented on the team approach displayed by staff noting that this in a very unique situation which very few organizations have the luxury of functioning in. She congratulated Ken Vraa for providing such a positive environment for the department to function in. Erin Ipsen-Borgersen asked that some further consideration be given to the option of a dog run in Eagan for those residents who do not have a fenced yard, i.e. townhome/condominium residents. Director Vraa stated staff would research this issue and bring it back before the Commission at a later date with their findings. With no further business to conduct, Deborah Johnson moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Secretary Date fl MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1993 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT DIFFLEY COMMONS SECOND ADDITION An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat of 29.3 acres for 51 lots and 192 units for the Diffley Commons Second Addition. This addition is located north of Diffley Road and east of the current Diffley Commons Addition. The Second Addition is located in the Eagan Hills PUD. The PUD agreement has previously shown a high density designation for this area. Site Reviewal The site contains a ponding area that will be retained for ponding and water quality purposes. A play area, located in the northwest comer of the plat provides some open space play area. Additional open space has been retained around the ponding area which could provide for some passive opportunities. Parks Dedication Requirements As part of the Eagan Hills Planned Development agreement, the parks land dedication for this PUD has been determined previously. Part of this dedication has resulted in the Meadowlands Neighborhood Park. This particular subdivision will be responsible for a Cash Dedication requirement based on the residual land equivalency and a Trails Dedication. For Commission Action To review the Diffley Commons Second Addition and make a recommendation for a Cash Parks Dedication and a Cash Trails Dedication consistent with the Eagan Hills PUD. KV/dj C O MMMI S S lO ND IFF C O MM. ME M /3. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: MARCH 2, 1993 SUBJECT: WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR DIFFLEY COMMONS 2ND ADDITION - (THE ROTTLUND COMPANY) PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a multi-family residential development consisting of 192 units on 29.3 acres and located along the north side of Diffley Road east of Beaver Dam Road in the N 1/4 of Section 20 (Figure 1). The land is now zoned for agricultural uses, so a change in zoning to allow a mixture of residential uses has been requested as well. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding requirement and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in its Water Quality Management Plan. There are also wetland issues associated with the plat. WATER OUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed development lies in Drainage Basin A. Stormsewer draining approximately 13 acres of this development is proposed to discharge to Pond AP-4 (Figure 2), a pond designated for wildlife habitat in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Since this is one of four classifications that falls within the recreational use category of the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan, on-site treatment to prevent degradation of water quality in AP-4 should be required. To adequately protect water quality in Pond AP-4, a detention basin to treat water from this drainage prior to discharge will be needed. Preliminary analysis indicates the detention basin should be about .4 acres in surface area, and be at least 1.25 acre-feet in wet volume and 3.1 feet in mean depth at the normal water level. Runoff from approximately 8.5 acres of the proposed development is treated by ponds lying within the Diffley Commons 1st Addition to the west. In addition, approximately 4.8 acres of the 2nd Addition site is occupied by a pond and woodland areas which will not be graded 1 /5t F by the developer. Thus, a net development area of 3.3 acres on the site should be subject to a water quality cash dedication requirement because it will be graded but not served by existing or planned detention ponds. WETLAND ISSUES A wetland inventory has been completed for the site by the developer. The only wetland identified on the site is the one associated with Pond AP-4. It is classified as a Type 5 inland fresh open water wetland and it's limits were delineated by the developers consultant on December 10, 1992 and subsequently field reviewed by City staff. The developer has expressed no plans to fill or drain the wetland as part of the development. The Eagan Public Works Department will, however, require that an outlet be constructed for Pond AP-4. The Stormwater Comprehensive Plan identifies a normal water elevation of 886.3, about 3 feet below the water surface elevation noted on January 26, 1993 during a site visit by city staff. A decrease in normal water elevation of this magnitude would cause draining of some of the wetland, and thus change the aesthetic and other values of the wetland, all of which would have to be replaced under the requirements of the Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA). After further analysis by City staff from both departments, it does appear feasible to construct the outlet to maintain a normal water elevation of 889. Baring insurmountable problems with safety, health, or welfare, staff is recommending that the Commission support construction of the outlet at an elevation that will maintain the wetland associated with Pond AP-4 in its current state. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that on-site ponding be used to adequately treat runoff from the proposed development prior to discharge to Pond AP-4. To the extent that runoff will not be treated by ponding, a cash dedication should be required. In addition, filling or draining of the wetland associated with Pond AP-4 should be completely avoided in order to maintain it's current size, function, and value. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator RB/nab 7b:aprnrc.061 2 ICO. 1~i1 \ i •Mr . 'fit ~ ` ~ • OPP p~~ _ E t t+ f! i s • to fly ems' G/\ \ rl r 1 ~{j r-I awvl 3Wr /1• 'm' t I a~x -38 Pin A h AP A4R gi.OAUA^ 84/.4 m_ °ac OF 4~ or! .{N'E IL 1- v 4(w GA 4 10E • - / l_.. . _ `mac AP 36 'r* i t d -TIT 1 plromv `!FIB y, 17 At U. kll~yii`k; 'h BLACxH P 27 4 b p , fJ PAR. FIT 03 '84.._'All lam) 7961 AK ;'j 1. 9 6:Q29.) r_ 92, °q i 4' ' t { L f o ~t~ 920.0 r i't? rt,' Ti ;95. L J, to w BP-3 j r{il 17 11) ' - j iL~ pfP 35 90 2 } , ~'1.'.;; ; r I ,n An 1 t 1 u+rr+L i?it3/ M~Liu 1 I r D ! i 920.2 I '/,,t'^ r G AP-4a. I_L A N• 4,w` dt, N , 886.3 ' y` BP-25 AI-w e9o.s ~T? A -7t "y S-s 9242 J f i8B 65 351~ 924: 42.I g99 Al 9295 j IBZ _jj~ ) A- it 16,9 5.0 ( ' C_s A N m •A, BP~24 ~~tea 9201D.RATFU +:1 A _AP-5t I / % lid I I, AP' l~ ~ ~ j 'i.` ~ i~ J"• 93.9-• t, ~ ~ iKF~Ah A , a~ ~ T ` T.ta. 1P/ OAK ic, ~r.}~~•~J ,I PIS. B -23 THOW Fj_ ,j ti ~~~ggl.3 I AS LA i i1 I• =:~`•i\~%L y < j~ ;t~ [llr.:~~71'~ (893 iNW. P. EIG ~b?-8.1 ` ,.;;,1,1 "904.0 I R, a~ e92.cl' 05.0 ,1- *;TT? A' . 878.P_ 8 ~,aT -00 ISM 12~ 18 ~ ~ v _ AP3 g6 _ 8 rE '•j ray - i. IS' It •;`i~'r1t AP~49, •1I:F L AK Firm 2 PROJECT SITE STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN ~I' MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1993 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION GALAXIE-CLIFF PLAZA THIRD ADDITION; LIFETIME FITNESS A preliminary plat has been submitted requesting a health club on outlot A and outlot E of the Galaxie-Cliff Plaza Additions. The Gala.ie-Cliff Plaza was a planned unit development originally approved in October of 1988. The site is located west of Galaxie Avenue and South of Cliff Road. The site has relatively rolling topography and a diversity of vegetation which is primarily volunteer growth. There will be a loss of some tree massings. A landscape plan has been submitted to reflect reforestation efforts for this site. Parks Dedication The obligation of the Parks Dedication responsibility with this plat were outlined in the original planned unit development. The recommendation of the Advisory Commission included a Cash Dedication requirement for Parks and a Cash Trails Dedication. KV/dj C O MMI S S IO N G A L CL IFF- ? f F, M TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH 'WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: WATER QUALITY AND WETLAND REQUIREMENTS FOR GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION-LIFETIME FITNESS DATE: MARCH 2, 1993 PROPOSAL This preliminary plat application is for a health club and associated parking facility on approximately 5.4 acres, along with an additional 8.5 acre lot which will be platted as an outlot and for which no development is planned yet. This development is located along the northwest side of Plaza Drive, south of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 (Figure 1). FOR COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission will need to review and make a recommendation regarding whether the development should be subject to a ponding and/or a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards as set by the City in it's water quality management plan. There is one wetland on the proposed outlot. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS This proposed development will generate stormwater runoff that will discharge to Pond AP-14, a shallow sediment basin. Pond AP-14 in turn discharges to Pond AP-42, then to Cliff Lake (AP-11), a recreationally classified lake in the City's water quality management plan (Figure 2). About 5.4 acres of the site will be developed to accommodate a health club and parking lot, while the remaining outlot-which includes Pond AP-14 will not be developed at this time. Since it is unclear what use, if any, will be made of the 8.5 acre outlot, staff suggests that the Commission consider requiring a cash dedication based only on the portion of the total parcel that will be developed, then handling water quality requirements for the outlot when it is re-platted for development at a later date. The 5.4 acre development is too small to accommodate an on-site pond that would meet the NURP criteria that the City has adopted for treatment ponds. Therefore it would be appropriate for the Commission to require a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding as a means for the developer to meet the City's water quality treatment standard for this site. As the Commission will recall, the cash dedication amount is determined using City water quality pond design criteria to determine the surface area and volume of a hypothetical pond that would meet treatment standards for a particular development. The pond surface area is then multiplied by a unit charge from the Parks Dedication fee schedule and the volume is multiplied by a unit cost for excavation. These two cost components are then added together to come up with the total cash dedication. Cash dedication money from developers is used by the City to fund water quality capital improvements-including land acquisition and excavation- elsewhere in the system. The developer correctly states that a flood easement for Pond AP-14 was given to the City by a former owner of the property. In this instance, the "hypothetical" pond surface area for the existing and proposed developments that will drain to this pond does not exceed the area of the easement that has already been provided to the City. Thus, the surface area component of the cash dedication should be dropped. The cash dedication for this development, then, should be based only on the cost to excavate the pond in order to meet wet pond volume requirements for the 'hypothetical' pond. This modification seems an equitable method of calculating the cash dedication for this particular development, as long as consistency is maintained by basing the excavation component of the cash dedication on costs for ""muck" excavation (about $5/cubic yd.) rather than common excavation (about $2/cubic yard). WETLANDS ISSUES A survey of the site was conducted by the developers wetland consultant in February, 1993 to determine whether any wetlands existed on site that would be filled or drained by the development activities proposed. Within the 5.4 acre parcel to be developed, none were found. The wetland associated with Pond AP-14 lies on a parcel within the proposed plat which will not be developed under this project. Thus, a no-net-loss determination for this proposed development is appropriate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed development be subject to a cash dedication in lieu of ponding to meet water quality treatment requirements. The cash dedication should be based only on the excavation component of the cash dedication costs and should utilize a unit cost of $5/cubic yard. In addition, the City has determined that no net loss of wetlands will occur as a result of the d elopment. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator 2 Old, . r, ICUT; E . . ~iL t 4,e 1 t ft~ • ~ } LLI 101 fl Ul! r,) - .tom ~ ~ I. ~ - . wt ~r ~ tZl:. ~ err , , •I ' • t It C aaa~1111¦.. % Ack a3. ~AP- 8 ~i' •~~Eli~ ..,1; ~ • ----1 s,,;; ~,r?~ ~1 AP-51 ~J 869.3 / } ~S ll( 1 I 2.3 ~r 876 3 89.4 J S =A~'OPg-ZB. AP-82 93.9 l' '09,8 884.5 1 T1 .1 S ~ BB7d IV (rah, <T. ~ ~ y j,~~ -1 ~..~r~•~•; s tt___- ~ 8 VIP 1% p !d- I f 7 yY \1 j'~~~/J '(I,~~ljiill/ •i!_J'! 93. : i IdP- .1` 't• »J t'~i-AP.i 14:t~ 2 J.llI _ 19040 ] t 41I!L 2tl r'g0 n ni 1TrI ti 8f19Pt ~9~t Li1at9OGt ; RIO 0 . .17 A-cc '-4 15 12 1e . 2; w.. a 8 3. AP- 9 BBB. 13 A- cc J~ T T 988 lilll •„?t 1 g8888p9.3 w~ t~jj?i9~iu AP' Q ti } IF LP K CF R X401 1i l~l es.0' AP=I k A: 93.0 i l t 0 A LE , .0 F 's +0 ( p.~ S.-,l+C ~t•.. P-50 885.0 886.0 95. u i rr i y O. } A-ss =f'~ }B92.O~~d I on tl _.oOS _ r I?97~ Pi ~93T9 900.0= AT 0 E 14P-t }8 =32j 9Q3./~ r~ J iGn(gg9 'p ~i 9 3.9f y. I-D r on?ryAP" r 100 2[' II 9 79 •i ..,rte IL~'iI 915.9 9 t t 11~ r~ ~ r 1 ~ CfiiTETI~ prnr.r 9.19.6 , r4-es~~ -t ~ ~ iAi~!.!~~?,~ ,~i 12 i" \ :'R'I ~?=wc"~ 93p~6 ~ii_iifj9%90 .eP 938.8:- }sir' .r ' ,9 8.8 11ti`,'=•1 i „ 4.3 3 Jk i rn :rt.j_I t• RtOGEC PARK • - g . n • 1 ~1t 911.0 45.0 -!8 "926 ~ A~-3 I 9/3.5 i i. ` • 97.0 48.5" 92S S ,9 2 P 93-30 / 926.0 PARR ~;z,', 938.6 f .,940.0. - 4 r, r A,'oT :AUNTY PAPni 893.3 F.95 2~ ' , v 49 UI _ 942 o~A-7ryr 900.0 1P } t I _ .'I ;?42 P.; ' ~ l eat} o -sft 7. N I Lit: . 22 # PROJECT SITE FIGURE 2 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF ~4. EAGAN MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1993 RE: IM[INARY P. T FOUR CROWN, INC.; dba. WENDY'S An application has been received to allow a Class II restaurant (Wendy's) on Lot 1 Block 2 of the Duckwood Crossings. This is located west along Pilot Knob Road, south of Crestridge Lane and the Chili's Restaurant now under construction. The existing sight does have a wooded slope along the south edge and a flat, grassy area along the north edge of the site. Some of these trees will be lost as a result of construction while many of the trees along the south portion of this site nearest the lake will, be retained. The landscaping plan has been provided and is included in the planning portion of the packet. Parks Dedication As it relates to Parks Dedication, the City is not seeking any land within this service area and as a result, staff is recommending a Cash Dedication for Parks Dedication and a Cash Trails Dedication. KV/dj COMMISSIONWENDYS.MEM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS IMPACT STANDARDS FOR FOUR CROWN, INC. DBA WENDY'S DATE: MARCH 3, 1993 PROPOSAL This request is for a planned development amendment to allow a Class 2 restaurant along the west side of Pilot Knob Road, south of Crestridge Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 16 (Figure 1). WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS REQUIREMENTS This development lies in drainage basin J and will generate runoff that will discharge to Pond JP-3 (Figure 1). Pond JP-3 in turn discharges to Fish Lake, designated as a Class I direct contact recreation water body in the City's water quality management plan. This planned development was approved in 1988 and is therefore grandfathered with respect to the City's water quality dedication ordinance which became effective in April 1990. However, City staff have requested the developer to route all stormwater runoff from paved areas of the site to the western-most discharge point to Pond JP-3 and to excavate sumps where stormsewers that serve the development discharge to JP-3. The first requirement will move the stormsewer discharge point for the property as far as possible from the outlet of JP-3 to prevent short-circuiting of flow, while the second will reduce the amount of coarse-grained material that reaches the deeper portions of the pond. No filling or draining of wetlands will take place, as the grading limit for the development lies at elevation 854, approximately 10 feet above the normal water elevation of 844 for pond JP-3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The developer should route all storm sewer serving paved areas of the property to the property's western-most discharge point into Pond JP-3. In addition, the developer should excavate a swap immed' tely in front of the flared end of the storm sewer. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator • 1 CHMA a a• C-c GMLAN~ arM~ • odTl -271 RK D . V11 CP-3 v CL~ I P-5 MACH MAN Wl Fox PARK UNISYS -d RIOGF 24 P-I 6 DP-4 CL. CL. N / A a9 -h A V P - V IL CL. j17J •~JCHNSON A Y 3rd I G M&EM Q Q fr o 2ND A ? ain PU j H J T Tr7MIN 11lN C P -12 Fm^ L+1 c N CENTRE T CL. VII V 2nd I H 7 R 0 SECO r. w_ I yBLDG ROY 0 K CP-6 3e G rl I 1 T qTH TOWN CE CL V( - FIRST r ? Tin JP-S~• Develorz ent location 2 Za RI v., i / ur E ANTI CL. }-~'1 i S. ML 7-7 • CL. VII JP -5 kill -~i BP-ti I -'Y, C;TY CL SLACXHaQVk. 27 XM + HALL = PARK jp- 31 C CL. E P-29.1 g2 ~y VII 8P - ' I -49 P CL. II I I V11 -s 48 -b VII j P HOSFOI JOHN i iRF H; FIRST 8P - 3 g RR111(((~~ , An - CL. V LANOAL 5 LIAN CL. V JP- PARK A jJ CL. BP-4 T B C BP-25 C L. vn Q CL.VII o c L' S?2 BP- I • VV/ ~ • ati 42 C. S. A. M. CLoV -~..A G 8 ASTEII ISTRATFO 3 iBCP L.kIII Or ~o• m r • MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION PAULA NOWARIAK, RECREATION SUPERVISOR DATE: MARCH 3, 1993 RE: SIP PROGRAM FEES Bac and As the Commission may recall, the Parks and Recreation Department was directed by the City Council to increase recreation program revenue. For fiscal year 1992, a new source of revenue was to initiate charging a fee for Summer in the Park (SIP). Last spring staff presented this concept to the Commission. This constituted a change in policy as these summer activities were previously free of charge. Consequently, during the summer of 1992, SIP and Playwagon fees were introduced. A fee of $10.00 was charged for SIP and $5.00 per participant for the Playwagon program. Staff was directed to re-evaluate how the fees were received in 1992. Discussion Staff usually does not bring program fee increases to the Commission. Because charging a fee for SIP was new to the community in 1992, staff wanted to keep the Commission informed, and recommend a fee increase for 1993. Staff has reviewed the 1992 program fees and attendance figures and determined that program fees for the summer of 1993 will be as follows: Summer in the Park: $15.00 per participant Playwagon: $5.00 per participant No Action Required PN/dj COMMISSIONSIPFEEIN.MEM a~. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: MARCH 3, 1993 RE: WADING POOL Background The City's recently approved CIP identifies a wading pool facility as a project to be funded in conjunction with the multi-use arena. Staff has initiated research concerning wading pools, however, that preliminary work has indicated to staff that the Commission's concerns regarding this facility are important to thorough research. Areas of Concern Staff believes that the following aspects pertaining to wading pools should be researched. The Commission is encouraged to amplify, redirect and add to any aspect of the proposed areas of review. • Minnesota Department of Health • Statutory requirements for wading pool construction, operation and management • Short and long term considerations • Is the wading pool part of a long term plan for a major swimming complex? • In the short term, what size of wading pool should be planned to meet the expectations of the community? • Operational Implications • Licensed staff to maintain the wading pool to state health standards • Energy costs of filtration, chemical, heating elements of the pool • Managerial Implications • Will the facility be managed with lifeguards on duty during all hours it is open? • Will reservations for private events be accepted? 3/. • Revenues • What level of fees are typically charged? • What attendance levels are required to create a break even facility? • Opportunities for Play Features • Should the wading pool include play features such as fountains, bubblers or sprays? • What are the cost implications related to play features? For Commission Action It is appropriate that the Commission review the areas of research concerning wading pools that staff has identified. Staff requests that the Commission amplify, redirect or add areas of research in order that all of its concerns are pursued. DP/dj COMMISSION WA D I N G P O.OL 3a. MEMORANDUM TO: PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION FROM: DAN SCHULTZ, PARKS AND RECREATION INTERN DATE: MARCH 1, 1993 RE: DOG RUN FACILITIES . . . . . . a . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Background: In January of 1993, the Parks and Recreation Department received a written request from a City of Eagan resident inquiring about the use of a fenced baseball field for running a dog. The current City ordinance requires dogs to be on a leash when in a City Park. It is the view of staff that running dogs in a fenced baseball field is not the proper or intended use of the facility. The Commission, at its February meeting, suggested that perhaps this type of "special use facility" should be considered during the study to update the Parks Systems Plan. The question at hand is whether the topic of dog running facilities should be included in the Park Systems Plan. Research Collected: The Parks and Recreation Department has researched the topic of dog runs. This will allow staff to be brought up to date on how other communities are handling the topic. Seven parks and recreation departments from around the Twin Cities area were contacted to gather information. The questions asked were if the departments have received requests for dog run facilities, if they have such facilities and if so what the facilities include. The Cities of Plymouth and Burnsville presently are without facilities for running dogs. These communities allow dog owners to bring their dogs into city parks, if they are leashed. The Cities of Brooklyn Park and Eden Prairie have had requests for dog run facilities. These communities are unable to provide dog run facilities at this time. Dog owners are allowed to bring dogs into city parks, if they are on a leash. The City of Maple Grove enforces the city ordinance of no dogs in city parks. The City of Roseville currently allow dog owners to bring their dogs into city parks if the are leashed. After receiving requests from the public, the city is in the position to lease some land for a special use facility. The plot of land might be leased for 10 years at $ 1.00 per year. This land could be used for a dog running or a golf driving range. 33 Hennepin Parks was the only parks department offering dog running facilities, they use the term "dog training facilities". Hennepin Parks have three parks that have dog training facilities available. Elm Creek Park has a dog training site that is approximately 40 acres in size and is partially fenced. Lake Sara Park has a site of approximately 40 acres and it is not fenced. Crow Hasson Park is a 2000 acre park that provides approximately 80- 100 acres of unfenced land for dog training. Users of the special use site dog training facility must attain a use permit at no cost, but must pay for parking by purchasing an annual parking pass. Hennepin Parks are not real fussy about cleaning up after the dogs because the area is a site where horses also run through and maintenance feels the cleaning up after horses is more important. People wanting to train hunting dogs are allowed to bring pistols using blanks into the dog training facilities along with live birds that are not native to the area such as pigeons and quail. DISCUSSION: After reviewing what Hennepin Parks offers for dog running, staff is of the opinion that the City of Eagan is unable to provide such facilities at this time. Facilities such as neighborhood parks and community parks are high use areas and the dogs could pose a threat to the safety of the park users. The dog run areas would need some sort of fencing or something to enclose the area to keep both the park user and the dogs safe. Fenced baseball fields might work for one person with a dog but it could open the flood gates to the rest of the dog owners living in Eagan. If dog owners use fenced baseball fields to run their dogs the fields will be open to the chance of being damaged or left unplayable. Staff feels sympathetic towards those who would like to run their dogs.. At this time, staff feels the only facility that would be adequate for dog running would be the inside of a hockey rink. COMMISSION ACTION: The intent of this memorandum is informational and to stimulate discussion about such a facility. No action is required regarding this memorandum. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 4, 1993 RE: TRAIL REQUEST PETITION Staff received a petition of 209 signatures from residents near Pinewood Elementary School on the east side of Eagan. The petition requests that trailways be extended on both sides of Dodd Road extending north from Cliff to Diffley Road. Trailways are intended to service residents of the area and make pedestrian access to Pinewood Elementary School and Trapp Farm Park more accessible. The City's Park Master Trails Plan indicates a single trail along the west side of Dodd Road. This plan, however, is several years old and will be updated with the Park Systems Plan Study anticipated to be completed by the end of the year. Staff has responded to this petition with a letter which is attached for your review. For Commission Action There is no action required of the Advisory Commission at this time. Staff wanted to provide this information to you given the number of petitioners. KV/dj C O MMI S S IO NPE 7 7 7 7O N. TR L city of aacjan THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN February 22, 1993 THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES Cey Adn**utrotor .Debra E. Bougie EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Pinewood P.T.A. Member C"y Clerk 4471 Reindeer Lane Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Ms. Bougie: I received your petitions for trailways from Cliff to Diffley Roads on Dodd Road. Dodd Road is scheduled in the 1994 City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for upgrading to an urban section. In addition, the City's Trails Master Plan also depicts a single trail along the west side of the roadway extending from Wilderness Run Road north to Diffley Road. Prior to the City moving ahead with the road upgrading and construction of the proposed trail, the City will be preparing a feasibility report with design consideration and associated costs for this construction project. At that time, the City will review the feasibility of extending the trailway further to the south from Wilderness Run Road to Cliff, as well as a second trailway on the east side. Whether this is successful or not will depend upon whether there is sufficient road right-of-way to facilitate the necessary street width. In the interim, the Master Trails Plan will be under review by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission during 1993. Recently, the City Council authorized the updating of the City's Parks and Recreation Systems Plan which includes the Master Trails Plan. Clearly, the issues that you have raised for trailway on both sides of Dodd extending from Cliff to Diffley will be part of the study process with the updating of the Trail Systems Plan. I certainly invite you to participate in the process of updating the Trails Plan. The City will be holding neighborhood meetings to obtain and gather input concerning this document and I encourage you to participate at that time. I will certainly retain your request and petitions on file to substantiate your request but still would encourage you to participate in the trail planning process. MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 30 PILOT KNOB ROAD THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT o AN. . MINNESOTA 55122.1897 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 '`PlE: (612) 681-4600 PHONE: (612) 681.4300 rA.x (612) 681-4612 Equal Opportunity/Attlrmotive Action Employer FAX: (612) 681.4360 11,1,): (612) 454-8535 TDD: (612) 454-8535 X. The petition also suggested the possibility of moving this work up to the current construction year. This is not feasible in that Dodd Road will become an arterial transportation link of the community while Diffley Road is being upgraded. As you may be aware, Diffley Road will be under construction this year extending from its current terminus east of Pilot Knob Road to Highway #3. If Dodd Road work were moved up to 1993, it would create an intolerable situation for residents having to deal with construction on both Diffley and Dodd. Again, thank you for your interest. Please feel free to contact either of us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ken Vraa, Tom Colbert, Director of Parks and Recreation Director of Public Works KV/dj cc. Tom Hedges, City Administrator D2B000IEDO.DD 3~• MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 4, 1993 RE: PERIDOT PATH STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Bad=and Peridot Path Park is located in Park Service Section 19. This Park Service Section is serviced by Woodhaven Park as a neighborhood park facility as well as Carnelian Park which is located off of Blackhawk Road. Cedar Pond Park is also located within this Park Service District and primarily consists of open space and play equipment. Peridot Path Park is primarily open space with a small playground area on the north end of the park. The park is dominated by a drainage swale which runs laterally through the park and is part of the city storm sewer plan. In fact, the original property was acquired primarily for this purpose. Area Improvements Improvements proposed for this storm water area include increasing the storm water retention area for 100 year storm frequencies. The storm sewer inlet is currently deteriorated and this section of pipe will be improved. Engineering and Parks and Recreation Department staff have met to develop a preliminary concept plan for improvements to their area, and on Tuesday, March 9, a meeting with area residents will be conducted. Results of that meeting along with the preliminary concept shared with the neighborhood will be presented to the* Advisory Commission. The Commission will be asked to review the site plan and improvements intended for this area to see how the storm water ditch improvements can enhance the remainder of the property for aesthetics and parks purposes. At this time, it is anticipated that the storm sewer improvements will be funded via the storm water trunk fund and will not be charged against the property owners via assessments. Park improvements, if determined could be done at a later date and financed out of the Park Site Fund, should that be a recommendation of the Advisory Commission. At this time, staff does not believe that any of the improvements that have been reviewed are of as high a priority funding as those currently envisioned in the next two to three year cycle. Consequently, staff would question the advisability of making significant expenditures for parks improvement within this area at this time. Assuming approval by the neighborhood, Commission and Council, the City Engineering Department hopes to include this project as part of the Cedar Grove Addition street reconstruction project expected to be begun and completed in 1993. For Commission Action The Advisory Commission is asked to review the intended site plans and improvements for Peridot Path storm sewer improvements to determine what physical improvements might be accommodated to improve parks open space opportunities. KV/dj C O AMS SIO NPE R ID O TP. A TH aw MEMORANDUM TO: PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: DAN SCHULTZ, PARKS AND RECREATION INTERN DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1993 RE: DEMOGRAPHICS AND DISTRIBUTION UPDATE - - - Background The last demographics and distribution update was done in. the summer of 1989. The memo prepared by staff for the Commission was a detailed review of the standards established by the City of Eagan for five major athletic/recreational facilities: tennis courts, softball fields, hockey rinks, soccer fields and baseball fields; applying those standards to what was the current population and a projected population. The memo identified how the City of Eagan met the demands for major athletic facilities. Demographic Process Previous demographics studies for the Parks and Recreation Department were based on housing inventories. Populations for each Park Service District were extrapolated from the known number of housing units multiplied by the Metropolitan Councils formulas for number of persons per housing unit type. An alternate method was also used by staff to determine population information. This method entailed contacting three local school districts about the school age enrollment numbers. This information was interpolated with the age range population percentages provided by Urban Design Systems Inc. During past demographic updates some methods of collecting data caused inconsistencies in the results. Those methods were not used to collect data for this report. The methods used to update the demographics and distribution of facilities for this report are as follows: 9'1. The population for 1989 is from the last demographics study, the 1992 and 1997 populations are based on housing inventories broken down by Park Service Districts. Kristy Marnin, Sr. Planner with the Community Development Department, provided the information for the housing and population counts. Traffic Analysis Zones were used to determine which Park Service District each household is located in. Traffic Analysis Zones are geographic areas used to forecast and assign trips. The Traffic Analysis Zone boundaries can be defined by alignment with major travel barriers. They can help coordinate other zonal systems such as Park Service Districts. The Community Development Department uses the number 2.72 to indicate the number of persons living in each household. The household count and population numbers provided by the Community Development Department were interpolated to figure age percentages, estimations and projections for population. The calculation of athletic facilities was done by using the Parks Maintenance Inventory list which was updated in October of 1992 and is part of the Comprehensive Maintenance Management Plan. The City of Eagan athletic facility standards are taken from the City of Eagan Park Systems Plan. Those standards are as follows: Facility 1 per X residents Tennis 1750 Softball 2000 Hockey 3000 Soccer 5000 Baseball 8000 Figure B-1 is from the City of Eagan Park System Plan and indicates where the boundaries for the Park Service Districts are located. Please note: The data provided in this report is less definitive than studies conducted with what would be considered actual census data. Also the changed basis for computation suggests caution in interpretation or comparison to previous studies. Staff is of the opinion, that census figures are unable to provide the information needed to complete this report. The census tracts do not match up with the Park Service Districts boundaries. POPULATION BY AGE RANGE Ago im 0-5 12.0% 1im 1997 1.5% 8.0% 6-16 20.0 23.0 24.0 17-20 3.4 4.4 5.0 21-24 5.2 2.9 2.9 25-34 22.3 18.9 18.2 35-44 21.0 24.3 25.7 45-54 8.0 7.1 7.8 55-64 4.5 4.8 4.9 65+ 4 _a 100% 100% 100% (The percentage estimations and projections are based on the 1989 update, a 1992 household count, and School District 196 enrollment projections.) Population 1989- 43,620 .1992- 51,223 1997- 58,672 (Projection) Approximations for numbers of populations per Park Service District. Park District #1 Population Am 11 6.454 Interpolated Data: Ages 0-5 513 645 516 6-16 924 1,291 1,549 17-20 165 247 323 21-24 223 163 187 25-34 996 1,061 1,175 35-44 947 1,363 1,659 45-54 354 398 503 55-64 205 269 316 65+ 138 174 226 Park District #2 Population 8.825 11,461 13,49 Interpolated Data: Agar 0-5 1,015 1,318 1,080 6-16 1,827 2,636 3,239 17-20 326 504 675 21-24 441 333 391 25-34 1,969 2,166 2,456 35-44 1,871 2,785 3,468 45-54 697 814 1,053 55-64 406 550 661 65+ 273 355 472 Park District #3 Population 5. 5 625,E 7.041 Interpolated Data: Ages 0-5 614 720 563 6-16 1,104 1,440 1,690 17-20 197 275 352 21-24 372 182 204 25-34 1,189 1,182 1,281 35-44 1,130 1,521 1,810 45-54 420 445 549 55-64 244 300 345 65+ 165 194 247 41. Park District #4 Population 5.19 7.868 $$SZ Interpolated Data: Ages 0-5 597 905 704 6-16 1,075 1.809 2,112 17-20 192 346 440 21-24 260 228 255 25-34 1,158 1,487 1,602 35-44 1,101 1,912 2,262 45-54 410 559 431 55-64 239 378 687 65+ 161 244 308 Park District #5 Population 11.036 1212 14,081 Interpolated Data: Ages 0-5 1,325 1,394 1,126 6-16 2,172 2,789 3,380 17-20 465 533 704 21-24 552 352 408 25-34 2,461 2,292 2,563 35-44 2,340 2,946 3,619 45-54 872 861 1,098 55-64 507 582 690 65+ 342 376 493 45• Park District #6 Population $,766 7.899 Interpolated Data: Age 0-5 1,056 908 704 6-16 1,655 1,817 2,112 17-20 436 348 440 21-24 438 229 255 25-34 1,955 1,493 1,602 35-44 1,858 1,919 2,262 45-54 693 561 686 55-64 403 379 431 65+ 272 245 308 Note: Projecting ahead to 1997/58,672 population; no. attempt was made to predetermine which park district would grow the most. All park districts were increased proportionately. Trends that can be noticed include the following: The school aged children (6-16)population will continue to grow along with the 35-44 year age categories. The numbers of seniors will continue to show an increase. 4(o. Park Acreage By Park District District #1 Total Usable Developed Open Space Cinnamon Ridge 7.5 4.0 3.0 4.5 Slater Acres 8.5 4.3 4.3 4.2 Kettle 9.5 8.0 8.0 1.5 Rahn 60.0 45.0 27.0 15.0 Meadowland 14.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 River Hills 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 103.6 77.4 58.4 27.2 District #2 Cedar Pond 7.7 3.9 3.9 3.8 Carnelian 7.5 7.5 7.5 0.0 Peridot Path 6.2 5.5 5.5 0.7 Woodhaven 24.0 15.0 11.0 9.0 Blackhawk 83.0 40.0 6.5 35.0 Sky Hill 12.0 10.0 8.0 2.0 140.4 81.9 42.4 50.5 District #3 Quarry 9.9 9.9 9.9 0.0 Moonshine 4.9 3.0 0.0 1.9 Highview 7.2 6.0 6.0 1.2 Pilot Knob 10.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Country Home 4.3 4.3 4.3 0.0 - - - - - - 36.3 29.2 24.2 7.1 District #4 Lexington 6.6 6.6 6.6. 0.0 O'Leary 16.8 10.0 7.0 6.8 Mueller Farm 10.0 7.5 7.5 2.5 Fish Lake 7.9 3.0 2.5 4.9 Wescott Station 31.8 15.0 15.0 16.8 Burr Oaks 58.7 20.0 5.0 58.0 131.8 62.1 43.6 89.0 District #5 Total Usable Developed Open Space Berry Patch 7.6 1.6 1.0 6.0 Patrick Eagan 102.0 10.0 4.0 92.0 Northview .64.0 59.0 59.0 6.0 Walnut Hill 25.8 20.0 11.0 5.8 Goat Hill 22.8 12.0 10.0 10.8 Oak Chase 5.0 4.5 3.0 0.5 Ravine 14.2 3.0 0.0 11.2 Carlson Lake 12.4 3.0 3.0 9.4 Thomas Lake East 7.0 4.2 1.0 2.8 Clearwater 13.8 7.6 4.4 6.2 Ohmann 15.0 15.0 13.0 2.0 Trapp Farm 59.5 25.0 9.0 34.5 Lakeside 6.7 4.7 3.0 2.0 South Oaks 4.6 4.1 4.1 0.5 Captin Dodd 15.0 6.0 6.0 9.0 Bridle Ridge 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 Wandering Walk 30.0 5.0 0.0 '25.0 Lexington/Diffley 65.0 55.0 0.0 10.0 other park property 16.0 5.0 0.5 12.0 506.4 259.7 142 250.7 District #6 Heine Pond 10.5 3.0 3.0 7.5 Evergreen 8.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 Downing 15.5 7.0 7.0 8.5 Thomas Lake 59.5 12.0 6.0 47.5 Walden Heights 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 Ridge Cliff 16.6 15.0 15.0 1.6 114.5 47.4 37.0 67.1 District #5 and #6 Highline Trail 43.1 20.0 10.0 23.1 Athletic Facilities City of Eagan Standard 34 1750/Tennis 29 34 11 2000/Softball 25 29 15 3000/Hockey 17 20 10 5000/Soccer 10 1 12 3 8000/Baseball 6 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 92 Existing 92 Demand 97 Est.Demand Residents per 1 Facility 1992 DISTRIBUTION OF ATHLETIC FACILi TIES BY PARK DISTRICT Park District #1 Park District #2 Park District #3 Population 5,611 11,461 6,259 Total Park Acres 103.6 140.4 36.3 Facilities Soccer 0 0 1 Baseball 1 0 0 Hockey 2 4 3 Tennis 4 4 4 Softball 3 0 0 Park District #4 Park District #5 Park District #6 Population 7,868 12,125 7,899 Total Park Acres 131.8 506.4 157.6* Facilities Soccer 2 7 0 Baseball 0 2 0 Hockey 1 4 1 Tennis 5 13 4 Softball 0 8 0 * Includes all of Highline Trail Commission Action The intent of this memorandum is informational and to stimulate discussion regarding facility standards and deficiencies. No action is required regarding this memorandum. 3. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION DATE: MARCH 3, 1993 RE: UPDATE, MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL Background Over the past several months, staff has been meeting with representatives from agencies such as the Minneapolis Park Board, City of St. Paul, MnDOT, DNR, Cities of Mendota Heights, Bloomington, and Dakota County. The focus is the Minnesota Valley Trail, local connectors and missing segments or connectors. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) funding is being sought to assist with construction costs for completion of missing connections. For the Commission's Information Eagan Parks and Recreation will submit an ISTEA application for the Nichols Road/Cedar Avenue Bridge connection to the Minnesota Valley Trail. To enhance the opportunity for high ranking, each community will reference the broader concept of interconnecting communities, facilities and recreational opportunities in its ISTEA application. In addition the Department is supporting an effort by Dakota County and the City of Mendota Heights as they negotiate with MnDOT for the construction of underpasses for the Soo Line Rarilroad bed during reconstruction of the Highway 110 on 13 interchange at the Mendota Bridge. The Soo Line Railroad bed is a potential regional trail link in the Dakota County trail plan. No action on this item is required. KV/dj COMMJSSIONMNVALLEY.TRL _ E E.~ ~ ?nom f %J" c3~9 8 ILOR Y~O `Y O- = o z0 ` <eY~ 1' I i! 011-0~ •arr!Y3H 3Aiia'.) a3i•hu Poll it a 11 sip I{ {1 err', ii 1 III r Ill t. , s» CL dO Q - {i - sa, 11 1 111 ~~`1' I a ' I I ~t~; I II 1.- I - hs,~~ _rr `\mo/YYYY~, ~YYYY Y.YYYYY.Lf.Y1YY YY YI•eY1Y~~~ YY.Y YY~ p T~ siy~ col 1•~moesissY.wn, weswoss, w _.r~~ll _ - Q`YY~ llw . I/ ill .sr jI C 1 ~"'..''r~„~~ , ~ L1 YY YY Y? •~Y. i~~~YYYY '~.YYY1~e~~e~Y.. 1~ u I X11~'~` I ?t anno _41111110, ~ . ~ a •7'~ : ' ` 'rit~«~ ••e~ Lull's i , • =fir' ! _ • • /gym i, 11 ~ • j i • + LEXINGTON AVE . J i ~9x f:ri;~ y~•. f~i FINAL DESIGN OF MENDOTA BRIDGE AND HIGHWAYS 13, 55, and 110 CONSTRUCTION- PROJECT - INTERSECTION CONTROLED ; _'.~a • ~J-'^+ j/ -r~ S~ , BY TRAFFIC LIGHTS ,M ~ i ' S . i i . `l • • • UISTIMO OPT-ROAD - y"' - f'CM • ~i,.y . , t• ` \~t~' 1 1 1 22ML 140=91000 I 4_11 _ - e-! O O O e• RITOMIIR)OS TRAIL TO `FCy, - hoc' 4 1 p 1 i Y /,•'!f?:•, _/•i•C±' r 1•. a~ t• H~(1_, f_: BE COWSTROCTRD WITH x t ROADWAY PROJECT se.. • y~.S' sy`,yT~rj t r~.i" .E j H• . .~t~~ O '-r%^ ,.5,. _ •l1Je71`~'~•s~ ` 't ~_..a~ ;•~xM - G f .a},1_ .o ~fi/}> Q~ j,~r~ `~~~,~~i~y~y .r" ~ .-~'i'~`,,j •.~!'2:'y~ `4 ~1 QTR pl i! 0 t'.s zi+• iq• ~ ~ jTc; ` -.r~.,. r t ~~-s' err . %~~I..~l~• 1 Gc 2 ° C1~.!' 1. 4 1` { r , ' t. ^i• ••A0. \ *1~~ L 0 . - • . ^a« r. 'l ice'- ! i PILOT-KNOB ROAD 9:. t: .•z n 1 (p~1C owwwl r. •x• . +1'•./'~ • 800 sY= .~„t et. ~e oyo E ' ABANDONED .ub ftt OR, fV4 er ~~t~.. :x~ ?•f it ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS FEBRUARY 28,1993 1. ' The warming shelters at the skating sites closed February 21, the latest dosing in the last six years. The tubing hill was open until February 28. Weather cooperated in providing a good we surface for the broomball leagues and the boot hockey league. The only outdoor league adversely affected was the 4-Man Hockey league which experienced snow during half of the Wednesdays scheduled. 2. Softball registration has begun. Returning teams register March 1 - 12. New teams register March 15 - 17. Play begins at the end of April. 3. An audience of over 400 people attended the February 28 performance of the Teddy Bear Band. This constituted the Cabin Fever Relief Winter 1993 event. Admission was non- perishable food items for the food shelf. Eight large boxes of food were donated. 4. The Seniors project with Northview Elementary School continues to progress. Six to ten seniors regularly go to the school to interact with children in various capacities. And, 50 first graders came to Oak Woods of Eagan again to read to, interview and enjoy a snack with seniors. 5. NYSCA coaches clinics will be held on March 31, April 3 and April 7. Staff anticipates that over 200 coaches affiliated with Eagan Athletic Association and the Rosemount Area Athletic Association will seek certification for soccer, softball, baseball and track. This program's focus is on working with youth as individuals, introduces discussion on the role of winning in youth sports and provides ideas about organizing practice and parents. 6. Although spring recreation program publicity is just now available to the community, plans for summer programs have already been initiated. Numbers of returning staff should be known by mid-month. 7. Recreation staff have attended a number of workshops during the past month. The Minnesota Data Privacy workshop drew attention to the public classification of all municipal class rosters. Of concern, is the Department's practice of not distributing babysitting class rosters. The employee selection and interview workshop was helpful in providing exercises for structuring interview questions to illicit responses that provide the information needed to assess applicants capabilities. 8. With the conclusion of the winter skating and tubing hill operations, Maintenance staff have been working on closing down these sites. This includes picking up all of the nets, gate boards, interior and exterior matting, temporary shelters, etc. Park Maintenance Workers Paul Graham and Alex Lammers have been spearheading this project. 9. As part of the forestry department's oak wilt control efforts, selected trees are being removed from a wooded area of Northview Park. Park Maintenance Workers Scott Eppen, Don Buecksler, and Gary Skogstad have been extensively involved in this operation, under the guidance of City Forester Tom Schuster. 10. Park Maintenance Workers Alex Lammers and Paul Graham have been assisting the forestry department in implementing a rotating tree pruning program. City Forester Tom Schuster has devoted a great deal of time and effort into developing this program, and the city will be assured of a park system of well formed, healthy trees as a result of his efforts. 11. With the curtailing of ice rink maintenance, the transition of equipment from snow and ice maintenance to turf maintenance has began. While a major part of this operation consists of changing over the attachments (snowblowers and brooms to mower decks) a detailed inspection is also conducted at this time to minimize the potential for equipment breakdowns during the intensive summer mowing program. In addition, efforts are being expended to ensure the city receives the maximum allowance on the mower units scheduled for trade in. (Cleaning and waxing, minor repairs, greasing, etc.) Park Maintenance Workers Steve Taylor and Dan Curtin have been instrumental in these efforts. 12. Fabrication and installation of cab protectors for the rear windows of all the city pick up trucks is currently underway. This was an item identified by the city's risk assessor. Park Maintenance Worker Steve Hadden is in the process of completing this task for the all of the maintenance divisions of the city . These protectors will greatly improve all vehicle operators safety. 13. Fabrication of replacement hockey goals has begun. Once these new goals are completed, all of our hockey rink sites will have a curved pipe design, instead of welded butt joints. These newer goals are both safer for skaters because they do not have any sharp angles, and require less maintenance because they have fewer welds. Input from all of the maintenance staff contributed to this improved style of goal. 14. The cooperative effort to construct one of the most unique baseball fields in the state took a giant step towards reality the weekend of February 20-21, when the Minnesota Air National Guard installed the preconstructed panels on the 30' high by 150' long left field wall. This project has involved assistance from a host of agencies, and will serve as an example of inter- agency cooperation for years to come. The Sentencing to service crew from Dakota County also painted 120 plywood panels that will be used for sponsor advertising at the fields. 15. Dorothy Peterson and John VonDeLinde have been actively involved in a consortium of agencies from the Minnesota River Valley Area who are coordinating the development of trails connections and linkages across community boundaries. In April, the City will be applying for Federal ISTEA funds to construct a new trail along Nicols Road and Cedarvale Blvd. to connect the City's trails system with the Cedar Avenue pedestrian bridge and state park trail. 16. Parks Superintendent John VonDeLinde participated in a focus group at Dakota Technical College in March, examining alternatives for establishing a parks maintenance education and training program for local governments. The college recently published a listing of four classes that will be available beginning this spring. 17. Work has continued on the development of a "tree preservation and replacement policy" for the City. It is expected that a draft will be available for Commission review in April. -City Council meting Minch 16. IM W\dvirory Pa? a, Recreation and Natural Re auras Commirion meeting March 10,1993 COMMISSIONHAPPENIN.FEB SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DIFFLEY COMMONS 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: THE ROTTLUND COMPANY LOCATION: 10-02000-011-51 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC BEARING: FEBRUARY 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of 29.33 acres for 51 lots and 192 units. LOCATION: The site is located directly south of Cedar Grove No. 7; west of Art Rahn Addition and five unplatted parcels which abut Blackhawk Road; north of Sun Cliff 3rd Addition and Diffley Road; and east of Diffley Commons. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE GUIDE PLAN: The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designation of D-III Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre). PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: Diffley Commons 2nd Addition is located in the Eagan Hills West Planned Development. The exhibits within the P.D. Agreement show a designation of "high density, 16+ units/acre" for this portion of the P.D. Normally, a P.D. Amendment would be required for a reduction in density such as is occurring with the Diffley Commons development. However, the Eagan Hills West P.D. Agreement contains a provision that states: "Less density shall be permitted at developer's sole discretion", therefore no P.D. Amendment is required in this case. SITE PLAN: The site plan indicates the total area is 29.33 acres. The Rottlund Company is proposing a total of 26 buildings (192 total units) with three housing types: Villa, Atrium, and Patio homes. Access to the site is provided from Beaver Dam Road where two public cul-de-sacs (North and South Ruby Court) provide internal access. Along the east half of the property is Pond AP-4 and in the NW corner abutting the first addition is a play area. It is the intention of the applicant to develop the site in .two phases. The first phase will include eight Villa buildings--one 4-unit building, four 12-unit buildings, and three 8-unit buildings; five 4-unit Atrium homes and four Patio homes; one 4-unit building and three 8- unit buildings. Both North and South Ruby Court would be constructed with the first phase. s7 North Ruby Court is approximately 640' in length, 140' above the 500' cul-de-sac maximum length required by the City. This cul-de-sac, however, is not a dead-end and provides access to the private street. It is intended that all of Phase I be addressed off Ruby Court. As proposed, all buildings meet, or exceed City setback requirements. Phase II of the development is located south of South Ruby Court and a portion of Pond AP-4.1 and Pond AP-4 and north of Diffley Road (County Road 30). This phase shall include a total of nine buildings (68 units). Three 4-unit Atrium homes are located south of the ponds and north of the private street (Sapphire Point) and six Villas (four 8-units and two 12-unit buildings) are located to the south of Sapphire Point and abutting Diffley Road. The two-story Villas located near the north property line and south along Diffley Road are approximately 1,250 sq. ft. The exteriors have aluminum siding and brick accents. Interior units have single car garages and end units have double car garages. The Patio homes are located between North and South Ruby Courts. The single level Patio homes are approximately 1,100 sq. ft. The exteriors are a mixture of aluminum siding and brick. End units are slightly larger and have a two-car garage; interior homes have a single car garage. The 4-unit Atrium homes are located around the ponds in the interior of the plat. These styles have aluminum siding and brick features and all have a double car garage. The buildings are owner-occupied and meet exterior building code requirements for multiple residential. The colors of the buildings are intended to be light grey, taupe, and beige. City Code requires one enclosed, or underground garage space per unit and one outdoor space per unit. The plan indicates a total of 439 total parking spaces for Phase I and 249 for Phase II. Three hundred eighty-four parking spaces are required by Code for the project; a total of 688 parking spaces have provided for the entire project. Of that total, 96 are guest spaces. The project provides 304 above the total number required by Code. The landscape plan was prepared to provide a variety of overstory and understory plant material and year-round color and also tying in to the existing Diffley Commons Addition. A tree survey was conducted on the east property line and around Pond AP-4. As proposed, the applicants do not include disturbing the majority of those trees. GRADING/DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL: The 29-acre site contains a mixture of open grasslands and wooded areas. There is a 2.4 acre pond, which is Pond AP-4 on the -City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, along the east edge of this site. Around the outside of the pond is an area of 2-3 acres of trees that the developer proposes to save and protect. The developer is also proposing to save a 30-foot wide stretch of trees along the southeast comer of this site where the development abuts single-family houses. The 30-foot wide buffer will help to screen this site from the existing single-family houses to the east. The preliminary grading plan also shows protecting an area of trees along the north property line of approximately 0.2 acres. The rest of the site, which is approximately 26 acres, is proposed to be disturbed by the grading to prepare this area for the housing units on this site. The preliminary grading plan shows cuts of 16 feet in the southeast comer and fills of 12 feet in the north end of this site. In three different locations, retaining walls are shown to be constructed. The developer will be required to submit detailed plans and specifications of the retaining wall construction for City review and approval prior to final grading plan approval. The majority of the drainage from this site will be directed to a new water quality treatment pond which will be located along the west edge of Pond AP-4. The water quality treatment pond, Pond AP-4.1, is proposed to. outlet into .Pond AP-4. Pond AP-4 currently does not have a storm sewer outlet and the outlet will be required to accommodate the proposed development. The outlet for Pond AP-4 shall be limited to a rate of 2 cfs. In the northwest comer of this site is a 4.3 acre area that is proposed to drain to the existing storm sewer that was installed with the Diffley Commons 1st Addition. This 4.3 acre area drains to Pond AP-35.1 which is a water quality treatment pond constructed with the 1st Addition. Along the west edge of this site, the developer proposes to drain a 2.2 acre area to the existing storm sewer system in Beaver Dam Road. This 2.2 acre area will drain to Pond AP-35 which is in the Diffley Commons 1st Addition area. Pond AP-35 and AP-35.1 have outlets that discharge in a westerly direction to the Rahn Road storm sewer system. The developer will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards to protect the existing trees and pond in this area. WATER QUALITY & WETLANDS: This proposed development lies in Drainage Basin A. Storm sewer draining approximately 13 acres of this development is proposed to eventually discharge to Pond AP-4, a pond designated for wildlife habitat in the City's water quality management plan. To adequately protect water quality in Pond AP-4, a detention basin to treat water from this drainage prior to discharge will be needed. Preliminary analysis indicates the detention basin should be about 0.4 acres in surface area, and be at least 1.25 acre-feet in wet volume and 3.1-feet in mean depth at the normal water level. The 6.5 acres of this development that will be served by ponding on the Diffley Commons 1st Addition was designed to drain to these ponds and the ponds were sized accordingly with the 1st Addition. A cash dedication will be recommended to meet water quality requirements for any remaining developed area on the site. A wetland inventory has been completed for the site by the developer. The only wetland identified is the one associated with Pond AP-4. Staff will recommend that any draining or filling of the wetland complex be'avoided during the development of the parcel as well as during the installation and operation of an outlet from Pond AP-4. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is readily available to serve this site from Diffley Road to the south, Beaver Dam Road to the west and from an existing 8" line that runs along property in the northeast corner of this site. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to three 8" sanitary sewer stubs that were provided to this site from the Diffley Commons 1st Addition. Water main of adequate pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this site from an existing 18" water main in Diffley Road, from an existing 8" water main in Beaver Dam Road and from an existing 6" line that has been stubbed to this site from Kathryn Circle. The preliminary utility plan shows an 8" looping water main that would connect to the 18" line on Diffley Road and two connections to the existing water main on Beaver Dam Road. Water pressures in this area of the City, which is within the intermediate pressure zone, are relatively low. Staff recommends that all lateral water mains within the development be a minimum size of 8". City staff recommends that the developer also connect to the 6" water main on Kathryn Circle. The loop on Kathryn Circle would provide another east/west feed to the trunk water main on Blackhawk Road and it would improve the quality of the water to the houses on Kathryn Circle. City staff recommends that a 6" sanitary sewer service and 4" DIP water service line be provided to each building. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access is available to serve this site from Beaver Dam Road which is a 44-foot wide street constructed by the Diffley Commons 1st Addition. Diffley Road, which abuts along the south property line of this site, is not proposed to have any access directly to it from this site. The preliminary site plan shows construction of two cul-de-sacs that would be publicly maintained that would connect to Beaver Dam Road to serve this site. Off of the two cul-de-sacs would be a system of private streets that shall be constructed to City standards as outlined in the City code. The preliminary site plan also shows one private street that will connect to Beaver Dam Road along the west edge of this site. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The preliminary plat is showing that an additional 15 feet of right-of-way will be dedicated along the south edge of this site where it abuts Diffley Road. No additional right-of-way is required for Beaver Dam Road. The (co. final plat shall include permanent drainage and utility easements to cover the proposed sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer lines that will serve this site. Also, permanent ponding easements shall be dedicated over Ponds AP-4 and AP-4.1. This new development will be responsible for obtaining all regulatory agency permits such as MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health, Dakota County, etc., prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Diffley Commons 2nd Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit M.F. $17.80/ff 370 if $ 6,586 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit M.F. 26.05/ff 834.73 if 21.745 Water Total $1 There are no pending assessments on this parcel on the date of this report. There are $27,244 of levied assessments which will be pro-rated to the succeeding parcels, which are created by the subdivision. Co(. PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS FOR DU LEY COMMONS 2ND ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al,B1,B2,B3,B4,C1,C2,C3,C4,DI,El,F1,GI,andH1 2. A final landscape plan shall be prepared on the grading plan. 3. The project shall have an underground irrigation system. 4. All plant materials shall meet City minimum standards. 5. All trash/recycling containers shall be stored within individual garages until day of common pick up. 6. A homeowners' association shall be formed and declaration of covenants shall be provided to the City prior to final plat. 7. A variance of 140' to the 500' maximum cul-de-sac length shall be approved for North Ruby Court. 8. The developer will be required to submit detailed plans and specifications of the retaining wall construction for City review and approval prior to final grading plan approval. 9. The developer is required to construct the storm sewer outlet for Pond AP-4 prior to final plat approval. 10. The water main layout shall include a connection to the existing 6" water main on Kathryn Circle. 11. The development is required to provide a water quality treatment pond with a surface area of 0.4 acres at the NWL, a wet pond volume of 1.25 acre feet and an average depth of 3.1 feet to treat the area before discharge to Pond AP-4. 12. The development shall provide additional right-of-way for Diffley Road as required by Dakota County. 13. The private streets shall be constructed to City standards as outlined in the City Code. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development'shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, .engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. ~3. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON Diffley Commons 2nd Addition STA. vP _ No / CNI I u • 1~ am STREET MAP I NF< J 4h ~A17/ a PA IL4 L J~ ~c ~ TNPY SKYI KN Waf IYKN f N ~ ~4 11E~~~~_ s E A~~ QUID 11111~~1J11~fill l~ ~f~? ill J LJ,~K4 ZONING MAP ri QN f" 41 ~~N[1LtL f D-1 1 -4 ••ny :i.M P OF P n,r . PF 0 t. Its COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP 13-1 b-s o ` Y. b•M A PF f 1 t •DIFFLEY COMMONS 2ND ADDITION EAGAN, MINNESOTA SITE DATA . - ` 1 r ,,T 7'G' •,ir„"?~ • Tar/l.al1* *5.lt.C f• 1 .y 'r ' ~~5N Will ANIA !1A•AC r~ ~t Mlua T 1105 AC. - a.s= ' r: _ "~>?I .T Hula it •.ta Ae. r; ._e. _ a ~:y:. EUILOMNif/UNITf TOTAL NV•IYO• a• Rly PuAa- 1 tT L MASS TOTAL am Nt P"A" a ••J/. "T' J . _ • ^ xcr.. = DENSITY • PuAta / a.•f awt{/Aa. Puua ! 0.•1 YINT{/K w 7 i ACT DSNNTT 1.55 ONITI.At. j , "I ~7• ram„ ^y,Wy~•-S .n" ` MUla1 •55 YINTI/At ' • . ' R` L K:r11T!R•~`•. "(7'.. •Z• rNA•a! to WNE0K 1 j wry' ' :I r • ~~"s Th=____ ~ . 1 • --ep~y.~- _ OOaaT 050 Is ' a . TOTAL allowma• no TOTAL"Wawa an "Use a LOCATION MAC I. Rd• I {ANA"/mall 04 I(! i alraNNN aMCa{ 164 ~-WW SUSIT aaeIS N LEOAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL NIODUaD Nt 27L'R fi•z M.C. ~w:.bti7 dxl. r" h0•E.nlI r2' r• P01Al •5051050 !N N10 5-A ANN.TMU aMIST _ .r ~..ww ....rw•... pp~ wA • Faorosao 11.4 Pull .r..w rw.w rrrrrrw N F{~ I• i - LAND11N . } GA NN M MA D-40 Mme',. » .`•I :.r. w.:i. ~ f¦I UTIUTIES AwIPAaLE sNEETINDEx :r--.:.: rw":•r~.',...r.:rrr:.".~'»:` ..ro.w LEOSND TYPICAL L COALS a DATA 151ST EROSION CDMTROL "011110 w w S. rpLv*ANT PLAT rte' ,~c . wwn urr ur S. SITU a YTMJTT ALAN •5I'• N. rrr rr• -N r..•rrrwrw.r.'rn rs.... u+..w A. ASAaNN PLAN rr WT PENCE AS awnaTUALSLSwTNIN •Nn..s wr..... •..w.++•.• •'~""w S ANCINTICT•AL SUVATNAIS w. w.. T. IANNCA PL N A5 m Y.w'r muri. rN r nw.' A FOUNDATW ION PLAN ` • w-~O~•I S. FawINrlW PLAN N. FOUNDATION PLAN wr..q ww1 rw wi L:.TSA• .~.F?~ nw.» w• K PoONDATION PLAN Ta./OYMDATNW PLAN iZ~ •'r. r a+. • r ..•ww n r.•r... • v... w... .,.r.. r w ..r• r rw •r 1R . r •w• " .v o~...r.•r xr o..•. uw N. LANOSCW DSTANS r.Mr ~ n"w e.r .W•M a...~ ~ _ w\ . 1' nww vrw. r.r F•.I.~.r 'L)` ~'ti..~ - .r....~.~••~i+rv _fll•.~ • .r.M ••w.~i.4r~r•w~r'~.i. r...yr•r••..N rr. ,v l r`•••_r"'rMrN rM.Ow•11 Yr.•~ rM r .N Y ~ ~IM.,wu•. w.. r. = w. . ~ - . - •n• _ - TN! NOI1LU O COYMNT •w.c. *5I• .T* „„1 111 r„R _ _ _ T.rw .n..•.. OIPfLEY COMMONS 2ND ADDITION COVER f DATA SHEET 3 L L L AXJ i •i s • ~ ~ gar - _ 'I ~ iy~~ CV, i t y - i ff i ~t 1 i 1 eft • ''I ! . _ il!l 7. j , wi• .7 1 . • • JAM [ r- \ \ i ! 1 \ ~ ppp{ 1 ~ [ /J ~ tr Is It I6 ~ • ti / eY III ~ / fit 1 I. , ~i l I Y ~ OQ •11 ~ 19 % 3 1 1/», ~ sw t %r s r E OFFLEY ROAD Sun tr// Third (08 . Addition t._ .16 • JADE LANE LLj Q. r / 1 i I • ~ eRs +1 ~ , . , ; , ' may.' R= •=_i O .•1 41 y ~ fl'" 1 •uw ra.~i W ( 1 r 1 ;a ~ gl, j i_ JADE ~,i _ -j LU Pr 1 10 P flu •w ~ynp; N _ 1 % ftd~; Am 5 I' wa-~.~-- ROAD 10. _ _ _ _ _ a - Ila~4• Si JADE LAWS i'/, , I I•t ft 1 A f 11 ~ / f is '1 e\ }f ~ I i~ L i [ / ii ' j/. 111 / f ~1 • t 11 l i J f wf f~, 1 1 .t,i` ' a ie f° i, VZ/ ei '~als,Y ° , i~ f 1 1 jit; ~ t/t • ~ i 7 11 A Xo : t t i' i 1 t 1 J 4 lit, c t j . \ wwwww=ill/mil ' j~ri It t 1 ~ ~:i • ~,1~ _ ~ ,t 1 iv 1 E 1 a L P ~f .j 11 y ~ t i!i` ~ t ~ •1 t 111 Ct~ 1 f Y t t r ate- 0 "Le I' -aaq--.. ^LrROAD 1 I - Y (t- ~ .r-~. w..~ w - ..r+... Mme. •..w ~ .~.~~ws ~~r L .IADE . Cldar ~_°YO~ 7th t~dlflion ;11 I {ttL 1j E Ci jy \y ^ 41 'elf le. 'c 1 t« 1S1 rrr~ , s~ f 1`11 I e" rl / • I 9 w ` //I! rr Id I ~ e_ f r \ l e ~ '1 s« i ~ e - T EI 1 . !t !g 1_ O • Z * 1 tw _ • ~ • 1 1 » ty !N ty YM A t C) r m W II Cl) I OFFLE1'ROAD Cl) m COH ThRd Addition CO) 3 i.. AN 41" Lv~W- ED It% P A-bbb ENOF '71.1 !fi. _K e = 1 /A-1I sgi SILVEa Az o1TIONi X _J ~e• ~ j ..tA A-h AP-38 to 4cK A F3AS.'t 1 f 04, low ~tZR /DE 424QT! ! LI_ A vL LENi 1 / Iu 1 . 4 " ST A 311N ME, F t1 L 36 -TT 1 \ v T Y P- A SLACKH 27 } yR '0 ~+~9 1 i r PAR ' / - . ~ 9 f qq AK ~Qt jj~jjjjj~jjlj i $J BP-29.1 916.0 Y 920.0 A H6.0' 6"! (u 6 1-fl I Ill,ii! 1p ' a„J "L,,-_3'eto A= i i~~. ;OA BID 3g ' I.TJ, ~C~44 .ll lTT~ i 11 T j x11lL ° P-.35 905.3 -LAND AL 908.0 b 4 f { 1 .1 ?`TTI, r 11TH nnR.nN K '1~ = 920.2 jJ g 1 T- A' A 11 / 8P-25 90.6 =~T 1 t~ ~-s 924.p T IY 4ii `J' w 020 -7. ?2" 27.2 AP-55 IX 15 1 0 F 880:6 A 2 ~5 E4 I s I 1 c 1' 1'~'` L IL' A-a. _ _ 8!!0 yL~ ~2 1 2 C_S A. H ~r. T7 P 24 7I ri T , , r~ 5 I 1)r APgg-5331)/ 92 RATFO All ; I~"'' 9 O X 1 I 1 P_ _ 2. t i ~ I (T!~(., , / y, 39~ c~ ."JA Fl- 8 a J o OAK% 11 1 } r 7?,r>`,`C ..1 .-t,I - PT5. B 23 v L A'~ i7 a ~r {1 t_ F TNO P. BP' LIG Ill' Ji t+ lL~ ~,.1t ! ` ?iiltLl } 1, 040 R>' 882. ' tt.o tr1t+::~ 7TT /0 7 ~3 1 3 (((TTi 17 n' 87B_fl AFT 9r a u IL T A-o 15 12• 18 a Z Al 26 l r'( _ I T q i. ti, P.^HrJ 8~89p.~3. r - al{ jrl lllClE APA9: I LAK . CgbRror,, ~4 ~1 •r b~ o~w n FIGURE No. 17 PROJECT SITE STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF 73• EAGAN 69.070.0 60 85 87 60.0 LL; ` 16~ I 1 j(+ r E ~St;I t~ 64.8/65.0 `BPy~flcf_NCTt r l ! 73.4/74.0 95 9Q 61L 6 ;A lei L 71.0 OE TI. 75.6/73.6 13 2 "134 133 ~f9".313(7. CF 13 f 31 ' e! is _-I i l13iS Z 0J 63. t 63.0 ~,,r{~,T 1 9LACKHAWI( 5 } w } F riQ ttV' PARK «s, r 611)j 129 64F1 ` 6c3 pit `.1,.~ N[pOt?tF1VEN j'- . ~t f ARK .i j a 1 ! ! ( t ! J 136 sisal/sa.o e ~yc`4``~ > r: i ' 407 ) TL _ T '711, 16 I~ OW PRESSUREt!t~'~ k tiltij , t FC 1 1 69.23-~ 12 3 d5'F3ia5o - t r 1 1 iAi a 2E Fn' t, ` ~Itt ?1 tj is Sir 6 M.G. , z g0- tg" • I1 ST RApE I~~ 121 59 UU 999999 16a~ 126 1HRVL.1' S 16~ )EE 1 , :dr.%f .6lttTl`A '11u~~`., F CAT&. N ALEJ 24.6/ 1020 71:1! r. ~~an?~ 125 P160 a56 / 647.0 33.0 78.~ 6 55. ,~~sf~! ~ j J Fl 16" IOQ~ 72.7`94.05.3 i 43.6/73.0 l 116 Ib".: I ` 1 g 18 150 18" wt nZAt I " x Ot 0 164 S A H 14 154 ? ' 3 4/620 J/ 163 i1' 6148~p j 55.211, i. t:a 70.2,92.0 i4i 16 m' 1 6 T2 76.8/08.0 158 all 71.1/92.0 4ibi U IVfl tH 1~1 1111 74.0 , i,1 :0 `/rye 15 pv, J l ~y r 4S 'j1;iF11!:ii ~11 1t'ft.' +72", 111 ~ r POWER U11LITV 6.7/75.0 It -1 12 - 1' /94.0 15C 95. 1111 f r.. iFi 39.v ti tlT*, Can, 1 ~6;~G LAKF1 CEt!*PE.Q'/ v PROJECT SITE WATERMAIN LAYOUT MAP CITY OF AGAN SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (GALA7IIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION) APPLICANT: BAHRAM AKRADI dba LjFETHWE FITNESS LOCATION: NW QUARTER SECTION 32 EXISTING ZONING: PD-LB (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - LIMITED BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow a health club, a Preliminary Plat of Outlot A, Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition, and Outlot E, Galaxie Cliff Plaza, consisting of three lots on 14 acres located within the Galaxie Cliff Plaza Planned Development, and a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign for the site on Plaza Drive, west of Galaxie Avenue and south of Cliff Road. BACKGROUND: The Galaxie Cliff Plaza Planned Development was approved in October 1988. The Planned Development Agreement permitted Limited Business zoning district uses and specifically excluded: radio/TV, outdoor storage, lodges, outdoor swimming pools, garden stores, movie theaters and municipal-type buildings. The Limited Business zoning district does not list "health club" as an allowed use, however "health center" is an allowed use. The Community Shopping Center zoning district lists "sports and health clubs" as a permitted use. Therefore, staff requested the City Attorney's office to differentiate between these uses (see City Attorney Dougherty's memo attached). EXISTING CONDITIONS: The health club site adjacent to Park Nicollet has a rolling topography that contains mainly scrub growth. The additional parking area (proposed Lot 1, Block 2) contains mild slopes and a small grouping of trees. Adjacent land uses include the Park Nicollet Clinic to the north, vacant Roadside Business property to the south, I-35E to the west, and single family residential across Galaxie Avenue to the east. COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing a three-lot plat that includes a health club on the 3.7 acre Lot 1, Block 1, additional health club parking on the 1.7 acre Lot 1, Block 2, and a ponding area with no current development plans on the 8.5 acre Lot 2, Block 2. Because there is no pending development for the proposed Lot 2, Block 2, this lot should be platted as an outlot. The all brick health and fitness club will be the second one of its kind. According to the applicant, the club provides ongoing education and the largest variety of exercise equipment in the Twin Cities. The club will be open 24 hours a day and provides an indoor pool and whirlpool, free weights, aerobics, cardiovascular equipment, and exercise equipment. At staff's request, additional windows were added pool side facing Galaxie Avenue. The three-stepped building has elevations of 14,', 18', and 22' that utilize the site topography to reduce any visual impact to the Park Nicollet Clinic. The City Code allows a maximum building coverage of 20% in the Limited Business zoning district. As proposed, the health club covers 20.8% of Lot 1, Block 1. The site plan must be revised to reduce the building floor area by 1,316 sq. ft. or the City Council must approve a Variance to the maximum lot coverage requirement. Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition (Park Nicollet) approved in 1990 was required to provide cross-parking and ingress/egress easements. This existing access will only provide service vehicle access to the rear of the proposed building. This design eliminates shared parking possibilities between the Park Nicollet Clinic and the proposed health club site. SITE PLAN: A new access to the site is proposed off Plaza Drive. The plan calls for a 33,630 sq. ft. building and 158 on-site parking spaces. Directly across Plaza Drive is an additional parking area providing 100 spaces. The Eagan City Code does not state a specific requirement for off-street parking with this type of use, but provides that the City Council shall determine the adequacy of parking when approving a site plan. As proposed, the parking on the health club site combined with the additional parking across the street provides a total of 258 off-street parking spaces which translates to one space per 130 sq. ft. of floor area. All building, parking, and drive aisle setback requirements are met. All proposed signage meets City Sign Code size and setback requirements and will be subject to Sign Code requirements and the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The preliminary landscape plan provides a mixture of overstory, understory, and coniferous trees that will provide year-round color. Berming will be required along all parking areas and underground irrigation will be required for all landscaped areas. ~ir+ . GRADING/DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL: The existing site contains rolling topography with a few small trees. The preliminary grading plan proposes to grade a majority of this site. The maximum fill shown is 18 feet and the maximum cut is proposed to be 10 feet. The developer proposes to construct two 6-foot high retaining walls along the 35E property line along the northwest corner of this site. The developer is required to submit detailed plans and specifications of the retaining walls prior to final grading permit issuance for City staff review and approval. The drainage from this site is proposed to connect to the existing storm sewer that was constructed in Plaza Drive. The storm sewer in Plaza Drive will convey the storm water runoff to Pond AP-14 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The proposed catch basins in the parking lot should be located along the gutter lines in thy concrete curb and gutter to avoid bituminous swales through the parking lot. The construction of the parking lot on Lot 1 of Block 2 will create a landlocked low area along the common property line in between Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2. The development will be responsible for extending storm sewer to drain the landlocked low area to the existing storm sewer on Plaza Drive. The development will be responsible for providing erosion control measures that will limit the deposition of sediments from this site to the existing storm sewer system and Pond AP- 14. WATER QUALITY: This proposed development will generate stormwater runoff that will discharge to Pond AP-14, a shallow sediment basin. Pond AP-14 in turn discharges to Pond AP-15, then to Pond AP-42, then to Cliff Lake, a recreational classified lake in the City's water quality management plan. As currently proposed, the development now encompasses approximately 14 acres and includes Pond AP-14. Staff recommends that the developer expand by 8,000 cubic yards (5.0 acre feet) the wet pond volume in Pond AP-14 to meet the water quality requirements for the 14 acre development. The developer is also required to provide information on any wetlands on the site and identify impacts and mitigation proposals as appropriate. The report is due to staff by Friday, February 19, 1993. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is readily available to serve this development from an existing 8" line on Plaza Drive. The proposed health and fitness club proposes to connect to an 8" sanitary sewer stub off Plaza Drive and extend the line up to the building. The proposed parking lot on Lot 1 of Block 2 will not need sanitary sewer service but the future development of Lot 2 of Block 2 will require the extension of the 8" sanitary sewer that has been stubbed off Plaza Drive to the northwest comer of the lot from Lot 1. '7 1. Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this development from Plaza Drive. An 8" line was constructed in Plaza Drive and stubs were provided for this site. The preliminary utility plan shows extending water up to the building from a 6" water main stub from Plaza Drive. The water main layout for the health and fitness club shall include a hydrant along the west side of the building to provide fire protection to this development. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access is available to this development from Plaza Drive which is a 36 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter. Plaza Drive was constructed by the City in 1990 under,City Project #598. The preliminary site plan shows one driveway connection off Plaza Drive to the proposed parking lot on Lot 1 of Block 1 and one driveway connection for the proposed parking lot on Lot 1 of Block 2. The proposed accesses are shown to be opposite of each other as they connect to Plaza Drive. The driveway openings onto Plaza Drive shall contain concrete aprons as shown on Eagan Detail Plate #440 for commercial entrances. The existing driveway for the Park Nicollet Clinic in the Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition development was constructed along the northeast property line of Lot 1 of Block 1 of this development. The existing driveway contains bituminous curb along the west side of the driveway and this bituminous curb shall be removed and concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in its place with this development. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The right-of-way for Plaza Drive as dedicated with the Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition is 70 feet. No additional right-of-way will be needed from this development. The proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines that will cross from Lot 1 of Block 2 and stub into Lot 2 of Block 2 will be public and require public utility easements be provided over these lines. This development will be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits such as MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health, MnDOT, etc, prior to final plat approval. 78. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Galaxie Cliff Plaza Third Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount WAC C/I $2,550/Ac 5.43 Ac $13,846 Storm Sewer C/I .036/S.F. 236,705 S.F. 8.521 Trunk Total $22,367 There are no pending assessments on the properties on the date of this report. There are levied assessments totaling $195,470 which will be pro-rated to the succeeding parcels created by the subdivision. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FOR GALAXIIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION 1. An amended Planned Development Agreement shall be -entered into prior to final plat approval. CONDITIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT - GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al,B1,B2,B4,C1,C2,C4,D1,El,Fl,G1,andH1 2. All signage shall meet Sign Code requirements and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 3. The building shall be constructed of brick. 4. The trash/recycling container shall be made of brick and attached to the building. 5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from ground level. 6. Underground irrigation is required for all landscaped and green areas. 7. The City Council shall approve a Variance to allow a building coverage of 20.8% 8. Berming will be required adjacent to parking areas. 9. Proposed Lot 2, Block 2, shall be platted as an outlot. 10. The developer will be required to submit detailed plans and specifications of the retaining wall construction for City review and approval prior to final grading plan approval. 11. The proposed catch basins in the parking lot shall be located along the concrete curb and gutter to avoid bituminous swales through the parking lot. 12. The development of Lot 1 of Block 2 will require the extension of storm sewer to drain the landlocked low area along the common property line of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2. 13. The 14 acre development shall expand the wet pond volume of Pond AP-14 by 8,000 cubic yards or 5.0 acre-feet to meet water quality requirements. 14. The development of the parking lot on Lot 1 of Block 2 will require the extension of an 8" sanitary sewer stub to serve the future development of Lot 2 of Block 2. 15. The water main layout for the health and fitness club shall include a hydrant along the west side of the proposed building to provide fire protection to this development. 16. The driveway openings onto Plaza Drive shall contain concrete aprons for commercial entrances. 17. The existing bituminous curb along the driveway along the northeast property line of Lot 1 of Block 1 shall be removed and replaced with a new concrete curb and gutter. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 LTS#5 j3. STANDARD.CON l[EMOR NDUM TO: Jon Hohenstein, Acting Community Development Director FROM: Michael G. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: February 3, 1993 RE: Health Centers Within Jimitec Business Districts Our File No. 206-1127 I have had an opportunity to review the City files regarding the original application for Galaxie Cliff development and in particular the minutes surrounding the Planned Development Agreement. At its regular meeting of August 2, 1988, the City Council addressed a concept plan for Galaxie Cliff property which included a proposed site for a U.S. Swim and Fitness facility. At the meeting, then Councilmen. :er Egan states: that he felt that the U. S. Swim and Fitness did not seem tc fit LB District. City Administrator, Hedges indicated that it was unclear what a health center mr-ins in the limited business context, and City Attorney Sheldon state the is..ie had not been researched. Thereafter, Councilmember Wachter expressed his opposition to the U.S. Swim and Fitness club and recommended sending the matter back to the APC. he City ".ounc':' took ._zis matter up again on September 6, 1988, at is regul ly !::heduled meeting. As before, then Councilmember Egan .stated th< need to exclude a proposed restaurant and the U.S. Swim and Fitness from the proposed plan. Thereafte,.; Councilmember Gustafson motioned and c,-uncilmember McCrea seconded the "approval of t.e conceF'-ual plan fc Galaxie Cliff eliminating the health and fitness fa=ili- the ..-staurant and _he retail store and that they be referenced outl• and other uses." This was approved 4 to 1, then Councilmember Egan siting to oppose. Thereafter, the project was approved on a vote of 5 to 0, to include a Planned Development Agreement for a five-year period prohibiting a number of items as allowed uses within the Gala}:ie Cliff area. NOTE: The September 6, 1988 minutes to approve the developer :.t, prohibited swimming pools from being an allowed use. However, .he Planned Development Agreement which was subsequently approved 5-0 by the City Council in October of 1988, only prohibited outdoor swimming pools. I thought it would be helpful to graphically illustrate the layout of the type of activity allowed in each zone for purposes of analyzing the distinction of uses set out in the Limited Business District. 0 • None of the uses identified in the Limited Business District is defined within the Eagan City Code. Our experience, is that when a court is asked to review and interpret an ordinance or statute, wherein a word is undefined or is subject to multiple interpretations, the court will (a) always give the word its plain meaning (i.e. dictionary term); and (b) when appropriate, define the word as it is utilized in other laws, regulations or previous court decisions. In interpreting the uses under Limited Business as noted above, the following should help define the terms used in the ordinance. Under permitted uses, one of the uses allowed is a clinic for human care. The dictionary definition of clinic is: "an institution associated with a hospital or medical school that deals chiefly with out patients; a medical establishment run by several specialists; or,.a center that offers counsel or instruction." Additionally, under the Minnesota Rules, a clinic is defined as "a physicians office primarily used for out patient treatment." Also, the Code provides a health center as an institutional use. The dictionary definition of institutional is "the building or buildings housing an established organization or foundation, especially one dedicated to public service." Further, public service is defined as "a service performed for the benefit of the public (i.e. not for profit)." The next logical step is to determine what a health center is, in light of a building for public service. It would seem logical that a health center provides health services. Under Minnesota Rules, health services are defined as: "the services and supplies furnished to a recipient by a provider for in-patient hospital services; skilled and intermediate nursing care; physician services; out patient and physician directed clinic services; community mental health center services; home health services; private duty nursing; physical therapy; occupational therapy; dental services; laboratory and x-ray services; hospice care; day treatment services; special education services; public health nursing clinic services; etc." While some of these noted uses are distinctly set out in the Eagan Code as conditional uses under the Limited Business District, it is obvious that there are many more facilities or types of health service facilities addressed in the Rules. Moreover, though the distinction may be more in identification, as opposed to practice, it is arguable that the difference between the permitted and conditional uses in the Limited Business District, stems from the definition in a not for profit activity versus a for profit venture. I hope the foregoing is a useful tool in the analysis of the LB classifications and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to be in contact with me. MGD/wkt 05" fQ„Il~ f - ~ ~ L~ e 14 4ft f Z 4 f q \ . Alt, top- -9 N 2; ~dA ~;;4 •t A,a e rsI ~ •~:%rr~e:~%'•«, by i = 1 .~f. f ,..'r.Li w•~ yS 1_ '1 r - - s. s h. 4{t. I ~7. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION J,w lu / I ! 1 141 a~CY3d~i : i~' / / ~ 1 I I'1 w mtvw4r4o - °u`::: •w« 4«..u.«.. r... i/ / I 1 1 11~ 4.4 / / , / / I 11 1 t«.1 Y.• .0...I, •.1. 4.5.0.1 0..«4 / / ' 1` /I 1 1+111 w..•...t..w•1 o.•w •.1. u.n. ...«4 / ,r• , / / / 14 Y.. N L« 1. •4«.y - 51..1.4 •.1. 45.0.1 w.••t / 1 $ . / 111+, M •N......N•N wt 4.0. •N4wIN _ _ ,•'1~•• / = 1 ' 1 0.UU« ••0..M •...w« - •.•.u...a..L0.• .a..H \ ; II : 1 ..•...4.0........4.«N . _ \ \ - \ 111 lb ".0 0-0 21. i! , \ N \\111•, jo, - •'~-.~'1~,7e!~.•.• ~-`~~`~\~•+\I III/~ ,f ~ d • v1c ~ ' • / ` it till 1 1 11 / `4 , V 00. / ~ r'- ~ 1 4 r te, 1 .Lp is _~i + 1 s: 1 i ~ \ .1 111 11 I 1 1 / . y,~.•-Q p 1 / r ,1111- `.J11/.~ i' %\O\\ 11 4, 1 I 1 i ~y:-°t'y 1 1111 Ili 1\\\ 1 1 •/f' 6611 de / / ~ / / , . 4 ,+1111\4\, ,'1 ~ ~ / ~ 1 ~ . _ / ~ \ t \ - 11,11 1 ` 41 : 0' \ , _ - 1 1 \ I I r~ , / ~\\\~\444 \4 r• 1 4j;; 414 '441 I li/~/• t ////I/ 1 C\ \ \ 1 I l/ortrl\\\.\\\4t.}~ • 1 4\, 4+~1u + t~-.: 6,19 :~/G / lr//,1///~/y~ 1111'4/ / - J. li//i 1 /I /1/// l// 1 /1 .\\\~\.`:''x~'••. / '1, 414',,14 • 11111 411/1/ .•r ! 11111 111 '!1 r 4/ l/~/// / 1 `~i I ,0/41 / K 1J14~1 1111 1./1~11/j1f~/l/ /1 ` I/ 1 1\~ 111 .tip - ' 1111 1 1 I''~t41y1) 1 1 ~ ~Yl / l l 11 j ~ / / 1 / • / 1 \ ~ 4\\\44`\4 ~ / - I Z~ . 1 1 ~.tf 1 1 ~ I f L ~ I V1 / / / l / I / / i / 1 1 ~ r 1 ~ 4 I \ 11~ 1\ ~1 4~ ..,1. • ~ 1~,~I~_ ,r ~i~ /1j1II ~-_~-~y~•' 1-'///1111 L / ! /i111'll`"a.."''•' M.. ] i~f~ \.lr~ I .~,c`~~:v GALAXIE DRIVE r•L ~ • All bill emu I'S~.Z W N LW7YM CWi.IA7ANIf./A 72 I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 351 IWSr~.Rl1 ~•w \ t r. . \ :I w•, wa • In.N« iN«•. a r..1....Ni I I-\ \ \ \ \ •i•../ A•.4H..f . MIf•W'a .u11Nw.•rr., h.1«. n.. M.N•.. rN. 1 _ ; I,. 1 _ t I .1~ 1 r' •..N.N INN I % 1 1 t \ It ~.uuwamos . w rl.. r..1..rN aw.u«N. 1 t \ 1 \ I 1 M.NI......~r w.N• It I i 1 \-.•r.\~\lot r 11.1 e~ ji / ) / . \ 1 ~11 ~1 Z!\w.-- ? \ 1 I \ _ NL•N N.I u..N r.«I . 1 1~1 /I \ )••-~`''--•w~\~~ ; t1 tawv~,..N MMIN .1/NN-..l l.«•N/N/N I + / / / i W \ ~ 1 I~ \ \ 1 (i • Iy M iwN« .«.NN M....N I I / \ ` 111 1 \ \ I \ t I I = t E N«I.N I. M .NI..IN ' 1 ~ \ 111\\~~// r • • • riI/\~ .~•\''1`.:a .dyr I•s ///~•..^\\\\\\\`\\\\ii`/1~ ~.I i T'b' iI .1 /1--k~ • rte! //~_.•.y ' O4 ~Q\ 0 u'i0.el:I¢111• ~a~ \ 1V~~- \\\\\\\~%1 O\~` .°x I. I.. q.u..w w/l1a \ \ \ 11\ 1 \ o F. ! \ \w~-1 „~\;1\1111 \ h - / I/~ l \ t 1.1 .11.1• N.... ' • 111 N1..1 " !~_S• 111 i Ar. •1 ' .n) ' - - NN. M w . 11... . 1 N-11-.~ «~..IN•.Iw MIN Sr k -w ::~rw r.....r~ NI MI IIN) r . `..r..~~... r~ r. - 1$ VS IIIYMIXf CIIIOIL1AlIf5. PA - r.. t t T Lj- ~ i• I jlj / . tilt Y~' ~,t. \11J e u I i ` I I I i 1 1 • t t R.J.Johnson Inc. y i LifeTime Fitness 10164 oAea•a ?.MB Ptua Dnve Maple Groe. AC< 55769 fAga& Mwiewu 4124:3.4330 I ~ ` ~ ~ ! r e I 1 f n is . ,y t 1 1 1~ 4~ vl t~lllllll l.}lllliil' ' i1 viii Ill -LA 't I :gy r~ l !fit : 114 t y' r'' ~ r 3 a S~ o I r e n I I I ZE • t = 1 ty LifeTime Fitness D Plan Dnvs o. .•wKr .ar• F.ew PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FINANCIAL OBLIGATION LEGEND GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION Storm Sewer Trunk Water Availability Charge INTER/TAT! HIGHWAY 331 rye I 1 1 ••i w,•••w.'• ? - MIP/u1 = iiiiw«:In r.«N r...«r y Y:.': 10/YNY t u r1.. rr1»rr srN1r•. 1 tii•. ~ ~'ti' ~ • •{iV.7 'mot- i.a ,.n.1.« t 1L•••]`.•. 111. N• •N«• NN N./•• r«I • I :~1.•' K:~;•~ T:::'4 ~ 7'' ~ w M I.•... r»N -N ••.1 1... M.•NM ' ' 1 ? J.I., ; },{f ':•:•••'.1•~.i,{.} jCl+!J/•;rSL:!•k~•\•5;:1'}{:y~•.::.: I t ` h N.N..1 N •.N.NN Ir/ .t•~~.SK~' (i:''r %i•'v. 2':'•i.i!ni~ 1~'~ ~1.7. .:1 III ' 1~ .1::•:i~Y:"~ ~ .y . • : 1•: j:::~:.~':: r'11.~ ..~Y~~~ j~{11}~ I+f'' • ' OG ~ O`i' M,.ia "luau Y~ r. ; t.. •.1•: !iii ~,7 t: d,i ' k •S'. } Y.~::; ~ 3 b q~ «w a w ww r.r rnw. •~'::va-...s -~ti': '•'ti;:ti:' ~~''2;rL;~!;!Mk`-'{•iYS~1~~~y~•t`%;';:: T' . ' . •n. a. 1w1 ur ar.» Nrs1 All "t IM) Mf/tLIMINAHV f•L~ti FINANCIAL OBLIGATION „ N, LEGEND GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 3RD ADDITION \ .....r...r Storm Sewer Trunk Water Availability Charge w / / 1 I I •t w.we - N..... r.N••,rw <N•N\•N•. r... / ~ 1 1~ ' NI •w / / ( I 11 1 ~ sNN r« • s\..m N.. r1 .w..1_ • l / 1 / ~ 11 , Ir r.• •I r1 «w1 • r•. •.I. N.\r ww ! ' / ``a / / I I r« N \.I N«N 01..« •.1. N.M. r.M ~,I•/ I 3 I I~; MMIN •I.M•Nr1 I•r MNNN ,Il .r / r / j r .N..•.\ w.« wN... - oan...L r.w j% - ~`'a 1111 ~ f~1 • / ~ ? 111' ~r 1a.1?/~alaleaa~ ' , ••-^x.•11 ...:1.;Mw.•:.•«°.:w~ ` r,r ' ~ ~ ~ ? \ 1111 r•..• Sir- IA ' ,Y Eye %`•r I ` ?1 ~i ~ ~ 1`I% ~i':'T~ ~ ; , 'if OIL N t:=: l~ - =11111111{l{, rl / yl~1i ~..••'~J iii `~~~,Vpr~; / °x!`'111 fill 11ft11 IT% ? ' 601"t- * . • \ :11= a? 111 I + J at 1. . .-:,.,+1'•;/.,;: 5. ~a 1 1 / i ~~\?~.a\. ; +r• 1 j t;,• it 1, ;1 1 1 ••/^i Y j~!/ •:;.',t~71;::. t./<:CaNt1' \ 1 I / l / /.I\?\~.\?\~t. ~y•`~'~ • ) II, :'~I~Ii:/i i' t as / jt/xr%r t:t:Y: LK'tYf~':/r';.:;;: I r r Yt! t• 1!` l:T.; °a?~t a}; 11 j ? , / /1 ; 1 11 \ 1 i~ / ~'t•',, /:/:j:;T <;I tatif;`~ 1 , L t/ M~r 1-e \ 1 I / ' r, w.I!1)~ 4:t:!•:f~t.. '1•l / ! l I / / / / ! I ! _ ~ 1 \ ? ~l. 1\ ~_•,I ~ r GALAXIE DRIVE All 4444 1140 1)1i Inllir1r'_~ 1 j 111. P ~T ili>l~s I,~I. 93.9 I~ T Mliii lllyn~ - ' 9011,TTTrT1 8TSPi1 aTr o t~ A- 15 12 18 i I vt~ 2 . It C) AP- 26 M"'1 a 899.5 i3~ 14-cc ' A~ ts., AP=23 ~t T 9P0. r: 1'1 889 3 % I.i ! APA9: r F LnK CFOr,' I l 4 , . CFAg7 4.~ ;E _ - ~ 885x0 )i 8Q92, , , t ) y 3. LI L 1, F5,25 o ~E / I;ti 'l~C AP-50 80.5 95.0 886.0 111 1~6 1( t d 7--- - BP-31 r • f4 . 1<, • Iy ~Ao \900.011. 0"{ AT '1 L ¢p 1 / - 1=2r a =32j Rnrl';A -4, + R 1 r~` ,1 1 _ff+FTEfi t~lnr•k 9j9: :~;8 ?1T1T1 i 1 11 ( 1 12,; \ li""~ 1rAV f,Tm l/ AP Iwo I 0A 'A 938.8 4. yy~ L 05 r r; 3 rn' 3 I{ I ~ 4 1, l4 11 o- O R ±r 1 A t .}a •1,• iii PA K it 11111-11[10" 3 , RIDGEC ? 911.0 X9.0 ! -18 3 I 9/3.5 49 U I 925.5 aY' ty,99. P-1 10 A014`\~ 41926. _ AL P-59 1' 'nr 938. 1_ n AO 40.0 92. x.~ r1n"OT ,OUNTY 893.3 x.49 ,~llj 9942. ,L Q A-yy PA 900.0 P ' eer~vl -art N rl 1 ~7 1 A-zz f PROJECT SITE FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: FOUR CROWN INC. dba WENDY'S LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, DUCKWOOD CROSSINGS EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class II restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2, Duckwood Crossings, and a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign. LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 2, Duckwood Crossings is located west along Pilot Knob Road, south of Crestridge Lane and Chili's restaurant (under construction), and east of I-35E. BACKGROUND & LAND USES: The zoning to the south and west is Agriculture, east across Pilot Knob Road is R-3 (Townhouse) and R-1 (Single Family), and the site and north of Crestridge Lane is Planned Development. The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan map designates this site as GB (General Business), as well as the area to the north. West of the site is guided LB (Limited Business); south of the site is D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre). Originally, the subject property was part of the Pondview Planned Development approved July 12, 1988 which allowed modified General Business district uses. The Pondview Planned Development was amended when the Duckwood Crossings plat was approved in October 1989 for the development of a convenience gas station on Lot 1, Block 1; retail strip center on Lot 2, Block 1; and a 6,500 sq. ft. Class I restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2. Holiday Station Store is existing on Lot 1, Block 1, and in August 1992 a Planned Development Amendment and Conditional Use Permit were approved changing the designated land use from a retail strip center to a Class I restaurant (Chili's). EXISTING CONDITIONS: The northern portion of the site is relatively open and minimal slope with the exception of the severe slope in the SW corner; the southern portion contains some mature trees that can be saved with careful grading. COMMENTS: The purpose for the Planned Development Amendment is to allow a Class II restaurant. Four Crown Inc. is proposing a 3,060 sq. ft. Wendy's restaurant with 122 seating capacity. Total parking for the site is 41 parking stalls, including one handicap. The landscape plan submitted reflects a continuation of the entire Planned Development. The single story brick building has a drive-thru located on the east side of the building, the menu board located south of the building. The site is facilitated by two access points along Crestridge Lane. It is the intention of the applicant for the site to function with one way traffic, entering through the west driveway access and exiting through the easterly access points. Directional signs will be located at these access points. This site plan was submitted for review by the City's traffic consultants, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson (attached). The truck circulation concerns related in the traffic study do not reflect that Wendy's receives no semi-truck delivery during customer hours. Deliveries are made between midnight and 6:00 a.m. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign. The sign meets, or exceeds all height and setback requirements. The pylon sign location shall be noted on the sign exhibit. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing site contains a wooded steep slope along the south edge and flat grassy areas along the north edge of this site. The preliminary grading plan submitted with this application shows considerable amount of fill will need to be placed in order to prepare this site for development. The maximum amount of fill shown is 12 feet and the maximum cut is 2 feet. Also, the final grading plan should contain 3 foot berms along the Pilot Knob Road boulevard to help screen the parking lot. The grading plan should be revised to allow the development to match at the top of the hill the steep slopes along the south edge of the site. The development is required to maintain a 50 foot buffer zone above the HWL of Pond JP-3. The buffer zone will help to control erosion from this site and preserve the existing grasses and trees in this steep sloped area. Drainage from this development shall connect to the existing 12" storm sewer stub provided from Crestridge Drive. The storm sewer in Crestridge Drive will convey the runoff to Pond JP-3 which is along the south edge of the site. Pond JP-3 is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water system, and the pond outlets into Fish Lake. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS: The preliminary plat for this development was approved in 1989 and is therefore grandfathered with respect to the City's water quality ordinance (which became effective in April 1990) and the state Wetlands Conservation Act which grandfathers developments receiving plat approvals during the five years prior to January 1, 1992. However, the developer will be requested to route all storm runoff from paved areas of the property to the western-most discharge point to Pond JP-3 and to excavate sumps where storm sewers serve the development. It should also be noted that Pond JP-3 is a protected wetland and that any modification of the pond cross-section below the ordinary high water level must be permitted by MnDNR. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient size, capacity and depth is readily available to serve this site from an 8" line in Pilot Knob Road. The service line from the 8" sanitary sewer line in Pilot Knob Road up to the proposed building shall contain a manhole at the right-of-way line of Pilot Knob Road. Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is available to serve this development from an existing 6" water main that runs along the west right-of-way of Pilot Knob Road. The existing hydrants in this area will provide adequate fire protection to serve this site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The preliminary site plan shows construction of two driveway accesses to the north that will connect to Crestridge Drive. Crestridge Drive was constructed during the Fall of 1992 and a concrete apron for a single driveway opening on the west edge of the site was provided with the upgrading of the street. The upgrading of Crestridge Drive provided for two eastbound lanes at Pilot Knob Road. One is for right- turn-only and the other is a left-turn or straight-through lane for Crestridge Drive. This second easterly driveway access as proposed is too close to Pilot Knob Road as existing ~l'7. traffic will create conflicting and congested traffic conditions on a City street with potential for adverse impact on Pilot Knob Road. This concern was evaluated and taken into consideration when Crestridge Drive was designed and constructed with a single access at the west property line adequate to handle two-way traffic (ingress/egress) from this site. For additional comments regarding the Wendy's/Crestridge Drive access, refer to the SEH memo dated February 16, 1993 that is included with this report. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Lot 1, Block 2, Duckwood Crossings 16-CU-1-1-93 Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount There are $27,244 of levied assessments against this parcel. %g' If approved, the Planned Development Amendment shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A Planned Development Agreement Amendment shall be executed. 2. The trash/recycling containers shall be attached to the building per the site plan. 3. The landscape plan shall conform to the overall Planned Development landscape plan. 4. An irrigation system in all green areas shall be installed. 5. An overall sign plan shall be submitted as an attachment to the Planned Development indicating: 1) the four directional signs locating the two access points along Crestridge Lane to encourage proper driving movements, 2) the location of the pylon sign and, 3) all building-mounted signage. 6. The development is required to maintain a 50-foot buffer zone above the HWL of Pond JP-3. 7. Drainage from this development shall connect to the existing 12" storm sewer stub provided from Crestridge Drive. 8. The sanitary sewer service line from the 8" sanitary sewer line in Pilot Knob Road to the proposed building shall include a manhole at the right-of-way line of Pilot Knob Road. 9. The easterly access to this site as proposed on the preliminary site plan shall not be allowed because of its close proximity to the Pilot Knob Road intersection. If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The pylon sign Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of City Council action with documentation provided to the City. 2. All signs shall be subject to a one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 99 A AdOW AMWN1r.P aAaOMrTw75 • vwwres 35 VAO WS CBMFR DERNE, ST, R4 .U MN SSII 09 812 NW OW 8156?O55 February 16,1993 RE: Eagan, Minnesota Wendy's, Crestridge Drive SEH File No. 89040 Mr. Jim Sturm City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Mr. Sturm: As you requested on Friday, February 12th, we have reviewed the proposed site plan and driveway locations for Wendy's at the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Crestridge Drive. As part of our review, we have looked at access locations, the parking area, semi and trash truck circulation on the site and drive-*m operation. Access The westerly inbound driveway does not appear to be a problem The driveway is approximately 150' west of Pilot Knob Road and is intended to be used as an Inbound only" access. Due to the angle of the proposed parking spaces and the directional flow of the drive-thru, it is not likely that this driveway will be mistakenly used as an outbound driveway. The driveway should clearly be signed as the entrance to the site and pavement striping (arrows) showing the proper directional flow of the traffic should be provided in the driveway and continued throughout the site. The proposed "outbound only" driveway located east of the Wendy's building presents other concerns. According to the site plan which was faxed to us (here is approximately 65 to 70 feet between Pilot Knob Road and the easterly curb of this driveway. This provides storage capacity (or stacking area) for approximately three vehicles waiting on C restridge Drive to pull out onto Pilot Knob Road. Since the Pilot Knob Road and Crestridge Drive intersection is not signalized, and Pilot Knob Road is a very heavily traveled major arterial, it is very likely that a minimum of three cars or more will be queued on eastbound Crestridge Drive at Pilot Knob Road waiting to pull out onto the roadway. During the heavier turnover times of some of the uses of sites along Crestridge Drive, such as the end of the noon hour at Chili's or the late afternoon from the medical office building, the flow of outbound vehicles on Crestridge Drive can be expected to block the outbound Wendy's driveway periodically. if drivers mistakenly try to enter the easterly driveway, this will cause traffic flow problems on westbound Crestridge Drive which could affect traffic flow on Pilot Knob Road. Vehicles turning off of Pilot Knob Road would be blocked from proceeding by the MELLIOTT ICSSON 1,C.. ST. CL= MN CHIPPIW4 FALLS, W M,4O1riM W In M. jim Sturm February 16,1993 Page 2 vehicle that is waiting to turn through the queue of traffic into the easterly Wendy's driveway. Drivers will generally realize their mistake after trying to turn at this location and getting pressured to move out of the way by vehicles behind them. Also, through prcmiinent "Entrance" and "Exit Only" signs at the two driveways and the use of a "Do Not Enter" sign at the easterly driveway, we believe that this situation will rarely occur. What should be recognized is the strong potential for traffic exiting the Wendy's site to queue on the site while waiting for the Crestridge Drive traffic to clear in front of the outbound driveway. The backup of this traffic has the potential of blocking the parking spaces closest to Crestzidge Drive as well as the ability of vehicles In the drive-thru to proceed away from the pick-up area. During busy periods, the City can expect to see drivers sitting perpendicular to the Sow of traffic on Crestridge Drive in the eastbound right turn lane waiting for an opportunity to pull into the eastbound left turn/thru lane. This will certainly result in inconvenience to drivers and some potential safety concerns. Over time, more and more of the left turning traffic is likely to use the northerly connection of Crestridge Drive to Pilot Knob Road (at Duckwood Drive), as this intersection is signalized. This will reduce the queue of traffic on Crestridge Drive. The proposed inbound driveway west of the building and outbound drive east of the building is certainly a better option than if the inbound and outbound flow were to be switched: However, as discussed above, this does not completely eliminate some of the traffic operations concerns associated with the location of the east driveway and Its close proximity to Pilot Knob Road. Parking The main concern with regard to parking Is the location of parking spaces on the east and the south side of the site. It is not clear on the site plan whether or not a customer doorway will be provided on the east side of the building. If not, customers who park on the east side of the site will be required to walk through the drive-thru lane and around the building to get into the restaurant. Truck Circulation Because of the angle of the southwest corner of the site, it will be very difficult for semitrucks to maneuver into the delivery area behind the building. If semitrucks park along the edge of the site near the delivery area, the truck, combined with vehicles in the drive-thru lane, would block the drive aisle for customers who need to circulate around the site to the outbound driveway, or to the parking stalls on the east side of the building. Furthermore, in order for a truck to exit the "outbound only" driveway, It would be necessary to use almost the entire width of the south portion of the site, including the south, portion of the parking along the east side of the site. A truck exiting the site at the "outbound only" driveway, will most likely use both eastbound lanes on Crestridge 7 Mr. Jim Sturm February 16,1993 Page 3 Drive since there is not adequate distance between the driveway and Pilot Knob Road for the truck driver to position the truck in only one lane. Depending on the frequency of deliveries, and the time of day during which deliveries are made, this may not be a serious problem. We suggest that the City place restrictions on the hours of delivery to ensure no trucks on the site during business hours. Drindbo 029011M The drive-thru lane can be expected to operate quite well provided that drivers waiting in the approach to the menu board stay close to the left side of the drive aisle, leaving enough width for other vehicles to circulate around them along the edge of the site. During times when the pavement is not covered with snow and ice, this could be accomplished by striping delineating the approach to the menu board. Since pavement striping is not visible year round, and drivers do not necessarily follow It consistently, occasional problems should be expected near the approach to the menu board in terms of delay to vehicles proceeding around to the parking on the east side of the site, or to the outbound driveway. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 490-2071. Sincerely, 1Z>/,4e, Cindy Gray, A.I. 'transportation Planner CRG/kam Wendy's NNI 3 3i STREET MAP , Nw " ANE ~ 1 f OL~I I _ . - y, ~ ~ ®r ICK - hJ O 1 ENGLEF OLSihD VEI t FO orpr G 7 E COMM. wIt T v t AFK •IL ~ AD bbd! ZONING MAP ' - CIIR II . ~ - `b' 2 no A" AMV qu. I CPD ':q. coo JJ 0-m c8c Le U ° o-M Od ,g Fuh COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP f il+co,. Owl t 1 aa6o7 •arc, - - - - - - r I. 1i ,y 1 ~;w <-\st s- ~ 'ra•334"=s=~°==~ _'«~=_========='S~'2= w.,o7 \ a c tr 11Da -i- ~ - 0- Me `Mao9 CRESTRIDGE DRIVE I FL P.A. !nom - - - - -684.87 rtaa,,2 •as,7o~ a,,a7 1r•• sf ~/1Q WIK . TOV OCR r . S$I T Trll Ww _ - --=t--- 71 qE HYDRANT 125 , , , Elev.. N1.77 1NI'L1et:7 ` • - 1 \ ~l - l . \ iNE NrdyNT I rte- ! _ a well ` ` rGATE Yt.WEa9G( ! i% 2. % 0"08 Fl. IIAID - 87 or M4 low 304% \ ? ` ~B. rag ad\ aa, to .\gm to 11 - \ \ \ ? \ r k t ` ~ i«7 eo ~ ' - 5 e ; to WENDY ? ? ? ? \ \ ~ ! ? U ` \ ca. I III a 'as % S ' 1 \ 6g6.50 FF w w o ' , . ! w 4:595 t}jMATS R t wt \ \ \ ` \ \ .10 t/ nD STALLS tr« 4 1 ^ ^ I = .1 14 ow.3 wteta:a cn I ( I••Ofit \ _ 1Tga_ 1ri 1 4 ` \ I I ~ed ! I II Q O tug{ „ \ \ ` \ \ stf \ 1 2 2~/ I ` 2 n 45"G 056 I if VbN We j \ f?. \ a. \ \ , °!1 L.•eF • ;t ,r r7acLiJ,o 1 •221 «r7a a / :r aw'a a 1.8 % % % WE" If 4111.211 845* t a \ ` \ \ \ \ \ C77 t \ ,i1 I \ 340 ` OQE r AGGREGATEIA•E , If / f ' 11 975 0 .131 1 956.6.. "lot ,~q ; \ \ ? ` \ \ I \ ` \ \ ` .yz r! \ Tea o0'7\ ` \ a . I € . % 07 6 % ? r':f \ 157091 I a`. \ ? .7i-tM2~-•~ !I ii `o as' o> I{ 1 1 1 `act \ SVII r 1 ' 1 1• 00.0m, % 1,7,3 ? \e? \ ?jE~1~ 064.68, % % % to % % 67 C= 'j, I j •ENO'1uR1 • 11of ``~MDZ \ ` j~~ ` ? ` ...L21 s-' ^ j FOE HYDRANT \ . -flr t ' SLAV. .a7243 LAKE \ s? \ \ \ \ ` ? . 1>0 , 1 4 WATER ELEVATION 12-07.92- 84.1 1 14it `\a" ? `w;.2~{ / I (I : If -4' r- 3' r' ~pWL}4tD1•DO f Gfv1r+ splrEn. IBS' fir Arte+K4. PWIWYD . k paw . Jr?+I '7'~I' uir f!w kfh'~ ePl q'o' AriMVAVL I .rY1PwrE9E T>Ke y1Lwa7' 1 urtw ~+rr.~•aY• ar~n ~s' •pcpre.~ NSF !Y ~ rr~swr~•~ ~ ca~~r avti+r4' ~n•.^nnn I .A~/lu+6sE fW NHf. 7' lTlF~rysl !f s fA,PA.P cl*,, „I wr"m rs utr~ I. i 1 G*'s1yrE wrm i 1rs• FwA•of ~ vrEHrnrs z!'tlc • PAO I psrVlu, A4M r•1nFdrMw MN , rrt •crr,PA ~ M. r q 8 t,' [D CYI riHD N•N V • F NMl. JQ•.. . • 7 dr'Mi>MCI~f• fir' 99}'PYNl~ 'tlfy D PwF NI'4 ' o• I Er IPA NNOEry yi"Cb AMNVA{• F r. 1 ~ 1 I• iS rl • _ K iii 4 i ?-•-A Le # . ,fir • - - is 4. ° • _ vixv I M S3P43S/X3& a~ t $ F 7 13' .t ~--'o~ t4 A ) Its y~ t vi I \ .I S #IJ 4 Y~ 7 7-71' 1fE ! fa Ali rib 1 \ \ is I I s oil l 1 - 1 or{ 1~ 1 J .I \ I' I III. yy Si. ~ al ~,I, , k~ .~.I:; ip Ea \ II1III 11411.1 ~j~. ~II'I a °I'~ I I. III i, II II II m .~L~~ 4 p°{ii ~ I'~I II 1 11, i 1 Ai t 1 \ IIII ' I II 11 I ,Li, I~' . ij•. M'' 1 t \ - j I T 3< L J ~ \ III 1 ~ , • • 4i i! •i ~11II~.III~ I w #s4 #i! #4 - Y i 4 99-099 oup JP Pq Q 7'-10.. OLD FASHIONED WP100 HAMBURGER 5'-2.. - - a IQASE WOULD B E 1q o 9RItJ&1NG ToTRL SIGtt EIGHT To 77' O" FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS: Concrete Base - 4'-0 Die. x 5'-0" Deiep. (Foundation specifications subject td local soil conditions and code requir mentsJ Direct burial installation. `