Loading...
02/14/1994 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MEMO city of eagan DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1994 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION SUBJECT: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14, COMMISSION MEETING Beginning at 6:30 PM, the Advisory Commission will be meeting as the Natural Resource Sub-Committee to review an issue having to do with providing a storm water bypass from Fish Lake to Blackhawk Lake. Staff believes that a one-half hour workshop preceding the Commission meeting will be more fruitful than trying to review this formally at the Commission meeting. The regular meeting of the Commission will begin at 7:00 PM. After Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance and the introduction of our new Commission members, the first item of business will be the organization of the Advisory Commission for the 1994 year. During the organizational business, the Director of Parks and Recreation will ask for nominations for the positions of Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary. A simple majority of those casting ballots will elect these positions. It has also been traditional for the Advisory Commission to organize into sub-committees to help carry out any of the business of the Advisory Commission. Staff would recommend that the Commission consider having a sub-committee on natural resources and a sub-committee on recreation. In the past, these committee meetings have been open to all the members of the Commission and frequently attended by all members. However, it might be advisable to appoint several members specifically to each committee, still maintaining the policy for other members' attendance. There are no items under Consent Agenda and only one item under Development Proposals. This development proposal is the Galaxy Hills Oaks Addition, which is a 1.4 acre sub-division on Galaxy Avenue. Staff has prepared a report for the Commission's review. l' Page -2- OLD BUSINESS There are two items under Old Business; the first is a sidewalk request on Bent Tree Lane. The Advisory Commission first heard this item in December, 1993. The item was deferred from the January meeting to February because of the absence of the family making the request. Staff has enclosed the previous memorandums pertaining to this item within the packet. The second item under Old Business is a Community Festival Survey. This carry-over item from Fall of 1993 pertains to interest in the community in a festival. There has been much discussion about a festival event from various quarters of the community and staff did a sample survey of community residents. Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation, prepared a memorandum and will speak to this at the Commission meeting. NEW BUSINESS There are two items under New Business, and again, staff has prepared separate memorandums pertaining to these items. The first item which is LAWCON/State Outdoor Grants program will require a motion from the Advisory Commission. PARKS DEVELOPMENT There are three issues under Parks Development. The first item does have a memorandum prepared for Commission review. This particular item asks the Commission to come to a consensus on a proposed parks dedication with a plat to be reviewed formally at the March Commission meeting. This is within Parks Service Section 36E, in the southeast quadrant of the City. The remaining two items are an update on the parks development program and, more specifically, the Lexington Diffley Athletic Site. WATER QUALITY Rich Brasch, Water Resource Coordinator, has two items for the Advisory Commission to review. The first is the Schwanz Lake Grant; the second, an update on the Carlson Lake project. The Carlson Lake project requests Commissions' direction on treatment options that could be pursued for Carlson Lake. Staff is looking for some consensus of opinion and agreement on the process to reach a conclusion relative to this particular water body. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS There are several items under Other Business and Reports including Department Happenings and, if time permits, working on the Advisory Commission's mission statement. We also hope to set a firm date with Dakota County Parks Representative, Bob Doffing. Page -3- As always, if members of the Advisory Commission are unable to attend the February 14th Commission meeting or workshop preceding the meeting, they are asked to contact Cherry Mesko of our department to indicate their absence. Respectfully submitted, Ke Vraa Directory of Parks and Recreation KV/lk COMMISSION11 COVER, fES 1994 ADVISORY PARKS, RECREAk..1N AND NATURAL RESOURCES MEETING SCHEDULE NAME Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec rsr 14 cou"" 14 18 16 20 18 15 19 17, 14 19 Ian Feb 31'- 22 Ted Billy X Erin Ipsen-Borgersen x George Kubik X Lee Markell X Dan Mooradian O John Rudolph x O• David Szott O Stephen Thompson X Ken Tyler X Michael Vincent Hr..+.~ X Jonathan Widem X UPCOMING MEETINGS 2/22/94 Joint Council/Commission Joint Dakota County Meeting AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Monday, February 14, 1994 7:00 PM Eagan Municipal Center A. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance C. Introduction of New Members D. Commission Organization (1) Election of Chairperson, Vice Chair and Secretary (2) Committee Appointments (Recreation andNatural Resources) E. Approval of Agenda F. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 6, 1994 G. Visitors to be Heard H. Consent Agenda 1. Development Proposals (1) Galaxie Hills Oaks J. Old Business (1) Sidewalk Request - Bent Tree Lane (2) Community Festival Survey K. New Business (1) LAWCON/State Outdoor Grants (2) Mosquito Control L. Parks Development (1) Pine Edge Addition (2) Update (3) Lexington/Diffley Athletic Site M. Water Quality (1) Schwanz Lake Grant (2) Carlson Lake Update N. Other Business and Reports (1) Department Happenings (2) Mission Statement (3) Set Meeting with Dakota County Parks 0. Round Table P. Adjournment The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status , sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the events. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City will make every attempt to provide the aids. S. Subject to approval MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA JANUARY 6, 1994 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on January 4, 1994 with the following Commission Members present: George Kubik, Stephen Thompson, Dan Mooradian, Deborah Johnson, Jonathan Widem, Ted Billy, John Rudolph, Lee Markell and David Szott. Commission Members Erin Ipsen-Borgersen and Frankie Hall were not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; C.). Lilly, LandscapeArchitect/Parks Planner; Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator; Shannon Tyree, Project Planner; Mike Ridley, Project Planner and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Director Vraa added'Eagandale 4th Addition' under 'Development Proposals' and explained that there were several items to be added under 'Other Business and Reports' specifically relating to future meetings to be scheduled with the Commission. Ken also noted that 'Sidewalk Request-Bent Tree Lane' was being deferred under 'Old Business' based on a request by Mr. and Mrs. Andrew Fink. Dan Mooradian moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as amended. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 1993 John Rudolph moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes of December 2, 1993 as presented. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items under the Consent Agenda. PONDVIEW ADDITION-GOOD VALUE HOMES Director Vraa introduced this item as a Preliminary Plat consisting of 29 townhome units on 12.5 acres located north of Englert Road and west of Pilot Knob Road which was previously reviewed by the Commission in February of 1993. Project Planner Mike Ridley noted that the applicant for this development is Good Value Homes. He added that although the Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council in March, 1993, it did not move ahead. The applicant has since obtained an additional .8 acre from MnDot, finalized the placement of Englert Road and redesigned the layout of the site. Mike concluded that the development is 4.4 units/acre which meets the D-2 mixed residential designation. Parks Superintendent VonDeLinde explained that a tree preservation plan has been submitted for this development identifying primarily small, secondary growth on the majority of the parcel. There are also several large box elders and elms on the westerly pond edge which the Commission had previously expressed a desire to save. John continued that the new site grading plan reflects that those larger trees will be retained. The loss of a number of other smaller vegetative tees will make it necessary for the developer to plant seven Category B replacement trees as mitigation pursuant to the Tree Preservation Plan. Superintendent VonDeLinde concluded that the replacement trees should be in addition to the normal landscaping requirements for this site. 7- Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 4, 1994 Meeting Page 2 Water Resources Coordinator Brasch noted that earlier review by the Commission resulted in a request for a cash water quality dedication. Staff if also recommending that the developer construct a sump off of each end of the storm sewer pipes discharging to Pond )P-3. Relative to wetlands, the developer needs approval to fill up to 230 square feet of wetland associated with Pond JP-3. This encroachment will be matched on-site with an in-kind replacement near the northern boundary of the developed area. Jonathan Widem asked for more information relative to the consideration for a tot lot in this development. Director Vraa explained that this residential area is bordered by 1-35E on the west, a pond on the north and west, Pilot Knob Road on the east, and Englert Road on the south. The nearest park for children who may live in this residential development would be Fish Lake Park requiring the crossing of Pilot Knob Road to access it. Director Vraa continued that the Commission has, in the past, explored the option of providing a tot lot or open play space in areas where access to an existing park would be difficult. Project Planner Ridley explained that when this item appeared before the Advisory Planning Commission in December they added a condition to the plat that a tot lot be included in this development. Mike clarified that the Advisory Planning Commission's recommendation was based on their perception that a tot lot would be recommended by the APRNR Commission but they would support the recommendations of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Ted Billy explained that one of the Commission's biggest concerns in the past has been safety which has resulted in recommendations that developments, appearing to have difficult access to a park, provide tot lots or open play space within their developments. George Kubik agreed but clarified that the Commission has also exercised some flexibility in looking at the needs of specific development before making that recommendation. John Peterson, representing Good Value Homes, addressed the Commission, noting that a similar townhome community has been developed in Coon Rapids. Mr. Peterson was concerned by the condition in the plat that a tot lot be provided since the target market for this development was young professionals and folks 55 years and older. Mr. Peterson identified a similar subdivision in Apple Valley which has very few children. It was felt that this townhome development will have few, if any, children. With that being the case, Mr. Peterson continued that the insurance for providing a tot lot within a development would prove to be burdensome to the association and they would prefer not having one installed. The homes are planned to be two bedroom, 1-1/2 bath in the price range of $100-140,000. Based on the product that is planned, Mr. Peterson contended that this particular home is not indicative to people with small children who would use a tot lot. Another concern expressed by Mr. Peterson was identifying a location for the tot lot since there would be limited space for placement. George Kubik noted that multi-family developments of 2+ bedrooms per unit are usually required to provide open play space. Ted Billy asked how much space is needed for a tot lot. Director Vraa responded that an area 50' x 100' would be sufficient for a tot lot or open play space. In response to a question relative to the grade of the center of the site, Mr. Peterson responded that it is fairly level. Ted Billy asked where the parent or grandparent of a child would take them if they wanted to go to a park. Director Vraa responded that Fish Lake Park was the closest but that it most likely would not be a park they would walk to. Deborah Johnson stated that as the owner of a townhome she would be opposed to providing a tot lot on the site. She continued that based on her experience, typically people with young children are living in a townhome until they can move into a single family detached home. Deborah also expressed her concern for the liability of the association in providing a tot lot. Based on the information provided by the developer, Ms. Johnson felt this particular development was not conducive to a tot lot provision. 0 . Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 3 John Peterson reiterated the target market for this development as young professionals and retired individuals which doesn't lend itself to the use of a tot lot. Mr. Peterson felt that open space which would provide use by all residents of the association would be more appropriate. Lee Markell suggested focusing on providing open space within this development rather than a tot lot. George Kubik suggested leaving an open play space and if the need arises, then a tot lot can be installed. Ted Billy asked who would determine that need and pay the cost for installation. Mr. Kubik responded that the decision would be made by the association and they would incur the cost as well. Dan Mooradian noted that the primary concern isthat this site is isolated and it is unlikely that children will be able to walk to a park easily from this location. However, Dan continued, people purchasing in this area will be able to see the street and pond obstacles that exist and should be aware that a park is not within walking distance from this site. Even with those obstacles, Dan did not support including a tot lot. George Kubik asked if an open space designation can preclude tree planting or construction of an out building on the designated space. Lee Markell suggested moving the center buildings slightly to enlarge the open space between those buildings. John Peterson noted that although the development to the north has been continued, if that does come to fruition, it could provide expanded open space. Mr. Peterson then identified a peninsula location that could provide the open play space the Commission has been referring to but could not occur until, and if, the residential development proposed to the north is developed. Mr. Peterson added that they are amenable to restricting planting within the area identified as open space. In response to a question relative to how much open space is required for a multi-family development, Ken Vraa stated that City Code identified 150 square feet per unit open space requirement. After further discussion, Dan Mooradian moved and Jonathan Widem seconded a motion to recommend the following to the City Council relative to Pondview Addition: 1. This proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. This proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. The developer provide open space within this development and work with staff to determine location and size of that open space. 4. The developer be required to construct a sump off the end of each storm sewer pipe discharging to Pond JP-3. 5. The developer be required to make a cash dedication to meet wetland quality requirements based on the area of the site of the NWL of Pond JP-3. 6. The developer is given approval to fill 230 square feet of wetlands with on-site and in-kind replacement underthe interim program guidelines of the Wetlands Conservation Act nearthe north boundary of the developed area. 7. The developer be responsible for planting seven Category B replacement trees for mitigation for lost woodlands. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 4 Ted Billy stated his uncomfortableness in not identifying a need for a tot lot within this development. He continued that it is unknown what the development to the north will be and there is a need in the community that can be addressed by tot lots in developments like Pondview Addition. Ted reiterated his concern that if a tot lot is not identified and there becomes a need for one in the future, there is no provision for the City to require one at a later date. After further discussion a vote was called relative to this motion. Those voting Aye were John Rudolph, Jonathan Widem, Deborah Johnson, Dan Mooradian, Stephen Thompson, George Kubik, and Lee Markell. Those voting Nay were Ted Billy and David Szott. The motion passed. PONDVIEW 2ND ADDITION Project Planner Ridley introduced this item noting that it was to appear at the December Advisory Planning Commission. The applicant continued this item pending the commercial/industrial review being conducted by the City. In conjunction with the commercial/industrial study, a transportation study is also being done relative to the feasibility of providing a ring road in this area to help with the traffic congestion. Pending the results of the various studies being proposed, this item will not be seen by the Advisory Planning Commission. Chairman Kubik suggested that this item be deferred by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission pending the results of the studies identified by Mr. Ridley. SILVER BELL 2ND ADDIT ION Director Vraa introduced this item as a preliminary plat consisting of 30.27 acres with one lot of 1.54 acres and one outlot for 28.73 acres. Project Planner Shannon Tyree continued that this site is located on the north side of Kennebec Drive, southeast of Seneca Addition in the southeast quarter of Section 18. This site is an open grassy field with high points on the northwest and southwest portion and virtually treeless due to prior grading. Shannon added that the applicant is Norm Vogelpohl and this proposal was approved by the Advisory Planning Commission at their December meeting. Director Vraa explained that staff is recommending a cash parks and cash trails dedication for this development. Parks Superintendent VonDeLinde noted that the site has been cleared and graded in the recent past and there are no existing trees on the building site and no requirement for a tree preservation plan. John continued that at the recommendation of Forestry Supervisor Hove the developer has provided for a mixture of deciduous vegetative overstory trees rather than planting all one species. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch noted that the developer will be responsible for a cash water quality dedication with the water quality for the remaining 28.73 acre outlot to be determined at the time of its development. David Szott asked if the Commission could recommend that oak trees be designated as the deciduous trees to be planted to fulfill requirement of the landscape plan but also to mitigate some the loss anticipated in combatting Oak Wilt. Mr. VonDeLinde responded that it was a good suggestion, however consideration would need to be given to whether oaks would thrive in the flood plain area which is where the planting will occur. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 5 After further discussion Dan Mooradian moved, Deborah Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Silver Bell 2nd Addition. 1. This development be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. This development be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 3. This development be responsible for a cash water quality dedication. 4. There is not substantial loss of trees or woodlands with this proposal, therefore, no tree preservation plan is required. EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 4TH ADDITION HAMPTON INN/CRACKER BARREL RESTAURANT Director Vraa introduced this item and explained that this is the first development proposal that will be processed using the new development process in which proposals will appear before the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission prior to going to the Advisory Planning Commission and then on to the City Council. With this first development, Ken continued there will be some issues that will require changes and refinement and asked the Commission to be patient as this process evolves. Project Planner Mike Ridley explained that separate applications requesting a rezoning from Neighborhood Business/General business to Commercial Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat consisting of two lots of 5.7 acres have been received by the City. This proposal is located in the southwest comer of the intersection of Lone Oak Road. The plat includes a 108 unit, three story Hampton Inn, limited service hotel on Lot 1 and a 9,700 square foot Cracker Barrel restaurant on Lot 2. Mike concluded that there are issues that are still to be worked out but this item is scheduled to appear at the January 25, 1994 Advisory Planning Commission. Director Vraa explained that staff is recommending a cash parks dedication for this commercial development and since trailways along lone Oak Road and Eagandale have already been required of this development, no further trails dedication is required. Parks Superintendent VonDeLinde noted that this site has been reviewed by Forestry staff and there are no tree preservation issues associated with the plat. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch stated that there are no wetlands on this site, therefore there are no wetland issues associated with this plat. Relative to water quality, however, Mr. Brasch explained that this site will generate a storm water runoff that will discharge through the storm water system directly to LeMay Lake, one of six lakes classified to support direct contact recreation. Although the water quality in LeMay Lake is good relative to other lakes in Eagan, it does not meet the standards set forth in the Water Quality Management Plan. Developments that discharge directly into recreationally classified water bodies are generally required to comply with on-site ponding and staff has requested that the developer reserve space for a water quality treatment pond. Rich noted that the site plan does reflect this provision. fl Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 6 Mr. Brasch continued that modeling of LeMay Lake and watershed pollutant loads indicate that almost 60% of the phosphorous loading into the lake comes through two pipes sharing a single location in the northeast comer of the lake. These pipes drain water from about 140 acres of commercial/industrial property with much of the development in this drainage area having occurred before the Water Management Plan was adopted. Water Resource Coordinator Brasch noted there were some options that the Commission may want to consider regarding the water quality dedication for this development. One option would be to require a cash dedication (estimated at $42-47,000) in lieu of on-site ponding to meet the water quality requirements with the cash to be used to fund a detailed evaluation of options to reduce nutrient loading to LeMay Lake and/or help finance construction of those options. Another consideration would be to require construction of on-site ponding to treat all runoff from this development prior to discharge to LeMay Lake with the pond conforming to NURP standards. Yet another option for the Commission to consider, Mr. Brasch continued, would be a combination of both options discussed. In conclusion, Rich noted that a comprehensive and thorough analysis should be done first to provide a basis for a decision on the best way to handle the major negative influence of untreated runoff from the existing industrial/commercial area to the north of the lake. Deborah Johnson asked what some of the construction options would be to help with the problem. Mr. Brasch noted that one option is to interrupt the drainage from the north and tie into a nutrient basin at a cost of approximately $300,000. Another option could be the construction of a NURP basin to be built on property owned by Northwestern Mutual at a cost of $300-500,000 including land acquisition. Anotheroption, which was recently made known to Mr. Brasch is the possibility of sectioning off an area of LeMay Lake with a curtain which would provide a nutrient basin within the lake but would reduce the nutrient loading to the majority of the lake. George Kubik asked about the possibility of curtaining off the lake. Mr. Brasch responded that he doesn't have sufficient information on this option yet, but will be researching it further to see if it can be a viable option. Dan Mooradian asked how much a study would be to determine the best solution for this development. Rich responded that $5,000 would provide a cost study to work with and coupled with the water modeling that has been done to date, there should be enough information to come to some conclusions as to the best way to proceed. Deborah Johnson asked if the runoff to LeMay Lake will increase. Project Planner Ridley clarified that the area to the north of this site is approximately 85% developed. George Kubik asked if the information obtained from this study could be used to help with future developments throughout the City. Mr. Brasch responded that the information will provide the basis for alternatives in future development with similar issues. Lee Markell asked if on-site ponding would fulfill approximately 2/3 of the water quality requirement for this site. Rich Brasch responded that it would. Mr. Markell suggested that in order to reduce the impervious surface within this development that the parking stalls be decreased from a 10' width to a 9' width and then the on-site ponding requirement could be increased to meet the water quality requirements for this development. Project Planner Ridley noted that this could be an issue to be explored, however, in the past,the City Council has maintained a 10' parking stall width in industrial/commercial sites. Lee reiterated his opinion that with the emphasis the City Council has placed on the Water Quality Management Plan it seems logical that consideration should be given to reducing impervious surfaces when possible; which includes looking at reducing parking stalls from 10' in width to 9' in width. George Kubik suggested that this concern could be addressed with the City Council during their next joint meeting. Planner Ridley noted that this will ultimately be a policy issue for the City Council but the Commission's concerns will also be -relayed to the Advisory Planning Commission as they review this item at their January 25 meeting. 12-. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 7 After further discussion, Dan Mooradian moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council relative to Eagandale LeMay Lake 4th Addition: 1. This development to be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. There are no trails dedication issues relative to this plat. 3. There are no wetland issues relative to this plat. 4. There are no tree preservation issues relative to this plat. 5. A cash dedication be required in lieu of on-site ponding to meet water quality requirements of this plat. The cash would be used to fund a detailed evaluation of options to reduce nutrient loading to LeMay Lake and/or to help finance construction of those options. Lee Markell moved, John Rudolph seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend to the City Council that in order to reduce the impervious area of this site by 10%, the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is recommending that consideration be given to reducing the parking stall widths to 9'. GOLF DRIVING RANGE Director Vraa introduced this item reminding the Commission that they have reviewed this item in the past but a decision relative to the term for a golf driving range has not been finalized by the Commission. It was hoped that information from the Parks System Plan Update relative to field needs would have been available to help the Commission define short term and long term needs for the Lexington/Diffley athletic site. Since that information was not available as yet the developers of the proposed golf driving range have asked that a decision be made relative to the contract so they can proceed with their plans in anticipation of opening the facility in 1994. Ken continued that he has met with Ryan Helgeson and Rick Kuchera regarding the layout of the driving range on the athletic site based on the results of the grading plan. Although the driving range can be facilitated on the site, there have been some concerns expressed regarding what impact there will be in not being able to use all the facilities located on the site, coupled with the potential loss of the Unisys fields as that property gets sold and developed. The other issue that is unknown at this time is the potential growth in the numbers of participants expected that will use Eagan facilities over the next several years. It is known that the growth in youth sports participation has grown dramatically and will continue to increase. In conclusion Director Vraa identified two issues for the Commission to consider. To review the reorientation of the golf driving range and the impact it will have on the adjacent property owners and make a determination on the length of the contract for use of the golf driving range at the Lexington/Diffley site. Relative to the proposed realignment, Ted Billy asked if golf balls going into neighboring homes would be a potential problem. Jonathan Widem asked if that was a potential problem would netting be considered. Mr. Helgeson stated they would prefer not installing netting because of the aesthetics and cost. Director Vraa added that there is a berm and there will be additional landscaping between the athletic site and the residential area to the southwest. It was also noted that targets would be provided to help control errant golf balls and reduce the potential for the golf balls to be hit into the residential neighborhood. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 8 George Kubik expressed his preference forthe new proposed alignment which places the driving range at a northwest to southeast or southeast to northwest orientation on the southwest portion of the site. This alignment does not impact the six proposed softball fields and would allow for their joint use with the driving range. Mr. Kubik did share a concern for how long the contract for the driving range should be given the pressure the City will be facing for athletic facilities in the near future. He opined that careful consideration should be given to the potential need for these athletic facilities by the community. In response to a question as to their hours of operation, Rich Kuchera stated this would not be a lighted facility, therefore it is anticipated the hours of operation will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to dusk. Stephen Thompson asked what the specific field loss would be if the driving range was developed. Director Vraa stated that two soccer fields and one overlay will be eliminated with the installation of the driving range on this site. Ken added that it appears that the need for soccer fields is presently being met but, the potential for growth is unknown at this time. Mr. Thompson asked why the length of the contract would be a concern. Director Vraa explained that with the status of the Unisys fields unknown at this time, along with the growth of participants expected through 1996-97, there may be the potential need to use all of the Lexington/Diffley site. Rick Kuchera clarified that based on the potential for errant golf balls using the new alignment, the 6th softball field probably could not be used until after the 4th year of the lease. Mr. Kubik reiterated his support of this experiment but again cautioned as to the length of the contract due to projected use of the athletic site. Ted Billy asked if the contract could be approved through 1996 with an option to continue the driving range if the site is not needed for other athletic uses. Jonathan Widem asked if it was feasible to have a three year contract. Rick Kuchera stated they needed a four year commitment for it to be a viable option for them which would take the contract through 1997. Dan Mooradian supported lengthening the contract through 1997 based on the fact that the softball fields will be able to be used jointly with the golf driving range. After further discussion, Dan Mooradian moved, Stephen Thompson seconded a motion to accept the realignment of the golf driving range, with staff to have the flexibility to work with Mr. Kuchera and Mr. Helgeson relative to the actual alignment on the site to best suit the needs of the site. The motion continued that the contract for the golf driving range is to be extended through 1997. Those voting Aye were John Rudolph, Jonathan Widem, Deborah Johnson, Dan Mooradian, Stephen Thompson, Ted Billy, David Szott and Lee Markell. George Kubik voted Nay. The motion passed. Chairman Kubik explained his opposition was based only on the extension of the lease to 1997. He expressed his support for the golf driving range experiment and wished success for the project. SIDEWALK REQUEST - BENT TREE LANE This item was deferred to the February meeting based on the request by the Finks that they be present. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Director Vraa explained that this is an update for the Commission relative to construction of two trailway segments being proposed as part of road improvement projects in 1994. The upgrading of Blackhawk Road from Deeryvood north to Highway 13 will provide an opportunity for an eight foot bituminous trailway along the east side of Blackhawk Road. The construction of the eight foot bituminous trailway will result in the loss of substantial vegetation in the area between Silver Bell Road and Robin Lane. The existing four foot sidewalk which currently extends south of Silver Bell Road approximately 800 feet will be removed and replaced with a six foot sidewalk. Ken continued that the six foot wide sidewalk that extends south of Silver Bell ties into the trailway currently in place on the south side of Silver Bell. Some of the concerns expressed by residents relative to this improvement included the loss of vegetation along Blackhawk, the need to extend the proposed east sidewalk all the way to Carnelian Park and the concern for bikes not using the trails. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 9 Director Vraa noted that Dakota County Highway Department has begun the study of the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road from Lexington Avenue to Trunk Highway 149. The City has requested that the design include an eight foot bituminous trailway on both sides of Yankee Doodle even though the County has expressed some concern because of the additional road right of way that the County would need to acquire. A feasibility study is currently being prepared on the upgrading of Dodd Road from Diffley to Cliff Road. Although the City previously identified a single bituminous trail on the west side of Dodd through this section, a petition from members of the Pinewood P.T.A. was received requesting consideration forconstructing trails on both sides of Dodd Road. Director Vraa suggested that the Commission look at these sites to become familiar with their location. 1994 WORK PROGRAM Director Vraa explained that the City Council has requested a uniform method for departments to provide information relative to their on-going responsibilities. The Council has asked that departments list a maximum of 10 on-going responsibilities and 10 special tasks so they can have an overview of work in progress and anticipated workloads. The Commission was provided with a draft of the 1994 Work Program for recreation, parks planning and development, parks maintenance and operations, public facilitiestservices non- park,forestry and water quality. Director Vraa asked that they review this information and provide input within the next few weeks. PARKS DEVELOPMENT UPDATE Parks Planner/Landscape Architect C.). Lilly updated the Commission on the miscellaneous development issues outstanding. He noted that work is continuing on the Lexington/Diffley site relative to site analysis. It is expected that the analysis should be completed shortly. C.J. also noted that the Blackhawk Park entrance sign has been installed and as weather permits, the retaining wall and landscaping can be completed to enhance the entrance to this park. SUBCOMMITTEE FOR FISH LAKE DIAGNOSTIC STUDY Water Resources Coordinator Brasch noted that after two consecutive unsuccessful attempts to secure grant funding to support development of a comprehensive diagnostic feasibility study and implementation plan for Fish Lake, the City elected to pursue this work on its own. The City felt the benefits of initiating actions to protect Fish Lake as early as possible outweighed the costs of financing the development of the study and implementation plan on its own. Rich continued that water resources staff has been engaged in an intensive in4ake and watershed data collection effort since October, 1992. After having hired a consulting firm to help assemble the information, the City is pursuing an aggressive time schedule in an effort to submit a draft report to the MnPCA fortechnical review by July 1, 1994 and then apply for implementation grant funds in late October. In an effort to provide adequate public review, two public meetings are scheduled to gather input from residents. Rich added that on-going participation from the Natural Resources Subcommittee would be helpful to provide advise on public policy issues that may arise and act as a sounding board in determining which elements to include as part of the implementation plan. In response to a question relative to the number of meetings involved in this process, Mr. Brasch responded there would be a need for 2-4 meetings over the next six months. Chairman Kubik suggested scheduling a meeting of the Natural Resources Subcommittee when other meeting times are being set up later in the agenda. f~ Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 10 After further discussion, Dan Mooradian moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to authorize staff to work with the Natural Resources Subcommittee in completing the Fish Lake diagnostictfeasibility study and implementation plan. They further authorized the inclusion of the CLMP volunteer for Fish Lake in subcommittee meetings regarding the Fish Lake project. OAK WILT UPDATE Director Vraa explained that the City Council authorized a special appropriation of $29,910 to the 1994 forestry operating budget to be directed towards oak wilt. The dollars are to be used for prevention and education, control measures and reforestation of oak resources. Ken noted that although there is no Commission action required on this item, it was being provided as follow-up information since the Commission had taken such a pro-active stand on the control and reduction of oak wilt. Chairman Kubik asked if the aerial photographs that had been done could be used for other purposes. Superintendent VonDeLinde responded that there may be a use for both water quality issues and for the computerized CIS system being established. DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Items highlighted included the significant increase in EAA participation since 1986, participation by staff in the Dakota Youth and Families Conference, mailing of the Community Festival survey, and receipt of bids for three pond modification projects. FUTURE MEETINGS Director Vraa advised the Commission of a meeting with Barry Warner of Barton Aschman Associates on Monday, January 31 at 7 p.m. to review the Park System Plan Update. Ken also noted that a joint meeting has been scheduled with the City Council for Tuesday, February 22 but the time has not been determined as yet. A reminder will be sent to Commission Members prior to both the January 31 and February 22 meeting. Mr. Vraa also advised the Commission that in order to facilitate the development process, the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting will be changed to the Monday preceding the 2nd City Council meeting. To help with this change, staff will provide an on-going calendar for Commission Members outlining not only regularly scheduled Commission meetings but any workshops and joint meetings that require the attendance of Commission Members. This calendar will be incorporated with the packet each month. Director Vraa asked if the Commission would like to combine a meeting of the Natural Resources Subcommittee relative to the Fish Lake Diagnostic/Feasibility Study followed by a meeting with Dakota County. Ken reminded the Commission that Dakota County representatives would like to meet with the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission in an effort to review joint projects and review services/facilities being offered by both entities. Rich Brasch suggested sending a written report to the Natural Resources Subcommittee along with a schedule and background of the issues that will need to be discussed and then schedule a meeting in March since the data is due on March 23. Chairman Kubik confirmed that would be a good way of handling the meetings for the Natural Resources Subcommittee, however, he suggested that the meeting with Dakota County be discussed at the February Commission meeting when a new Commission will be in attendance. Another meeting Director Vraa reminded the Commission they had requested was a joint Advisory Planning/Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting. It was suggested that this meeting could occur in late February or early March. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission Minutes of January 6, 1994 Meeting Page 11 Director Vraa explained that the 1994-1998 Capital Improvements Plan is nearing completion. Although it was hoped that input from the Park System Plan could be incorporated, a copy of the CIP without that information, will be sent to Commission Members for their review and input. MISSION STATEMENT This item was deferred to the February, 1994 meeting. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, Lee Markell moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voted in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Secretary Date i7. ~M MEMO _ city of eagan DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1994 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION SUBJECT: GALAXY HILL OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT BACKGROUND An application has been submitted requesting rezoning from R-3 Townhouse to R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat consisting of four single family lots on 1.4 acres of land. This site is located on the east side of Galaxy Avenue, south of Cliff Road and north of Karis Way. The site is located within Park Service Area 32 which is serviced by Ridgecliff Park. The 1.4 acre site contains heavily wooded, rolling hills. There are no wetlands on the site. PARK41RAILS DEDICATION The 1.4 acre subdivision does not provide for a park land dedication. Consequently, staff is recommending that this site be subject to a cash parks dedication. In regards to trails, there is an existing trail along the east side of Galaxy Avenue. Therefore, staff is recommending that a cash trails dedication be a condition of plat approval for this subdivision. WATER QUALITY & WETLANDS Runoff from the site will discharge to Pond AP-14, a designated sedimentation basin located on the east side of Galaxy Avenue. The runoff must travel through two more treatment basins before reaching Cliff Lake (AP-11) the first recreational classified water body downstream. Page -2- Because of the small size and heavily wooded nature of the proposed development and the fact that the development of this site will have a virtually negligible impact on recreational water bodies downstream, staff is recommending a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding for this development. The amount of cash dedication is now estimated at $1,730. In regards to wetlands, there are no wetlands on this site. TREE PRESERVATION The tree preservation plan has been submitted for this development. A total of 36 significant trees consisting of red and white oak and one elm presently exist on site. The oaks are fairly uniformly distributed over this entire area and range in size from 8" in diameter to 24" in diameter with an average diameter for the entire stand of 15.5". Initial site development will result in the loss of six significant trees amounting to 17% of the total. This percentage is within the standards of the tree preservation guidelines and, therefore, no tree replacement program will be required. The developer has also indicated on the tree preservation plan that significant trees located outside the grading limits will be protected during grading and utility installation to ensure survival. The tree preservation guidelines indicate that if any significant trees indicated to be saved are subsequently destroyed or damaged, the tree replacement schedule will be enforced by the City. FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION (1) This proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication. (2) This proposal be subject to a cash trails dedication. (3) That the developer pay a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding to meet water quality protection requirements for this development. (4) To acknowledge that the Galaxy Hills Oak Tree Preservation Plan complies with the City's tree preservation guidelines. The developer will not be responsible for tree replacement provided that no more than 6 significant trees are removed or damaged as a result of the grading and utility installation. (5) That the presence of significant trees on all four lots require future builders to prepare individual lot tree preservation plans at the time of building permit. KV/lk L31GALAXY.MMO 2D. I. pat, L r r J:~~ JJ i/AiZN C• • D ST / STA. l~ V S VEi CAVEMPORT oEs AVE Ne.l i SARI LL A4.1 IRA • JR LL. L _ AccNl *ASQNJ[ a el lit a CAR JADE w ~R PfAA' Om W U f 7 J A AL ( JAOE 'AO(AN r Sw oA a~ ~~j''pp RZr' g D- R SA IN 0 4' ~MAf pIT RD ; "R" .N( M (rl r Cm w~ v 0,1F " U ~•luMee 1~ R ? l7fIL cl ~ Q 5-FR PT r! CA me, Ne NEINE CT. 1f~i~ltr /I ~U7 p J ~1 X71 ~ ~ Ci"ry sTE ~ SMUT- T ~ ~ t ,WIM S - tt ~ dtrt ,;%U ~ e 'T I 11LEASP ~ EY•RN uNF. R t p b ~ OR r, t N r c mw _ fc 7 rr W 7 A r S• N CA ACN a' RX N t r( r STUr 1i LS r r• ~ a I a ~ ,'~i - U AIEADOIKAND I E W ( vl•w L AML ~t w La If L fr NICROR7 f MO ON F IMi( _ ~r Cv~. J ® Y No $ CT_ \ '/IAY = RAIN MA ) k.A • R yl'h` `444r LA IATDN/ WALM Ev. ^ TILTTLE • I I PALVIdWS AW • N€{T 11~ Q Nw i NE 3t 4♦y ~ S TRAIL G u - ~Yryf LA L _ Gfi 4 - RII 1 V R/ F PARR MT I _-I 1 WN[ FT R• SALEM PT ci 2 NNE IT IJ-JACRSIONC FT ~i fop7 S K M - MAROUIS PT. v wr hrd ® f- ANA P7 15-TRAVERSE PT f A S. It AD PT III- SOINIEL PT CIR n 1 i ACE PT 17 • NINTH PT 7• JELL PT. LISTA I. ;u „ ••MIOOEN PT SE NOIITEN PE Sw SE I-~MN1oA PT. 2O• STAVERN PT b• ARNNIY PT 21 - ALTA PT. ® r ♦ f J 11. NRUSN K, r r 6 y y~ V O,.•A*rioi\j 2 PRELIMI AN P Ole PULININAR7 f/ E C- OAKS ~ 00 QGOING PLAN Sbaet 2 of 3 1' ` ` \ ( ( I l 010-01\ i Scalar 1 Lath 40 feat - Rai tiag Contour - Pro cow Contour O D o0 of Oar 9e I ( 1 /'M'+5w SraL~ga a !ty A lble House - - - - - . - _W.00- - f Ica atica jl 1 71- The property a woo". t' 1 ~ i L. r No lot 4radi unti I 1 I boaaa are bai t. I f C.-7 Cr 1 PLRM ` 964 ' • LQ 8 Curb to be recoaa , i Co pity apeeifieat 060. a / .60- ti• 1 ' " i e .000, 1 4 aay~a ~bcfiif ~1 -2 tam, ~ 1 - 1`---t a~ - = RW~ 4 p / Prepared my: 11 1 i ' , . 001mar a. Sch aal Lnd Sarveycra !1 1 1 ' '7 14750 South aobart Trail Soaeaoamt!Sa 55068 i i 423-i7 69 1 \ / WavLaed 01-13-94 - ~r 1 L-J city of eagan MEMO DATE: NOVEMBER 289 1993 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS A RECREATION SUBJECT: SIDEWALK REQUEST - BENT TREE LANE BACKGROUND: The City received a letter requesting that a sidewalk be installed on Bent Tree Lane located in the Autumn Ridge Third Addition (see attached letter) for the purpose of meeting the needs of a wheelchair bound child. ISSUE: The issue before the Advisory Commission Is to approve or disapprove this request and if approved, to determine the appropriate policy to deal with other similar requests which may be forthcoming from other sections of the community. REVIEW: The City has not adopted a policy which requires developers to provide sidewalks on residential streets. In areas in which there are sidewalks now in place, they have typically been associated with transportation systems on collector streets or for providing access to significant points of destination such as schools, shopping or business locations. If this request is viewed as precedent-setting, then the policy implications must also be reviewed. A positive request would require a change in policies to accommodate this section of sidewalk. Such a policy will have to be definitive as to how it would handle other requests in other parts of the City where individuals who are also wheelchair bound would like access to shopping, schools, parks, bus stops, etc. Consequently, a policy with which to deal with other requests and provides the frame work for making decisions in the future needs to be developed; if there is an intent to approve such requests. 0~3 Sidewalk Request - Bent Tree Lane Page -2- As part of such a policy, it will also be important to re-review funding for these trail links. The current funding mechanism, while not precise, is an approach that is intended to break even. If the City gets into an extensive trail or sidewalk construction program which goes beyond that which is currently envisioned, it will be necessary to review additional funding alternatives. The current methodology, in its most simplistic form, is the cost of future construction of trails divided by the number of acres of undeveloped property yielding a cost per acre which became the trails dedication amount. Obviously, an increase in the number of trails and sidewalks fund (cost) or a reduction in the amount of acreage to be develop would result in a shortage in the trails dedication fund. Therefore, if there is to be significant changes in the sidewalk construction policies within the community, a review of the funding formulas. and funding mechanisms must also be part of an overall policy. AM: Staff has reviewed this request in light of the Americans With Disabilities Act legislation. Holly Duffy, Administrative Assistant to the City Administrator, who is the City's ADA Coordinator, states that the City would not be in violation of ADA legislation in the absence of a trail or sidewalk on Bent Tree Lane. FOR COMMISSION ACTION: The Advisory Commission should review the request by Mr. & Mrs. Fink to put a sidewalk on Bent Tree Lane and make a recommendation to the City Council relative to this request. If the Advisory Commission is to recommend a sidewalk be installed, it should develop the necessary policies relative to sidewalk installation on residential streets. If the Commission recommends denial of this request, which denial could be based on the basis that the City does not install sidewalks on residential streets. KV/Ik tWN MWASW a4. city of aagan THOMAS EGA14 Moves PATRICIA AWADA SHAWIJ HUIJTER SANDRA A. MASIIJ THEODORE WACHTER November 3, 1993 council MMrber= THOMAS HEDGES Clly AO *Wrolor Mr. & Mrs. Fink E. J. VAN OVERSEKE 13900 Chestnut Drive CKV c'"` Apartment 221 : Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Fink: I was pleased to meet you last week to discuss your letter of October 12 and your request for a sidewalk on the west side of Bent Tree Lane. AS I mentioned, this is an item that I will place on the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission agenda for the December 2 meeting. The request that you raise is a new policy for the City of Eagan. Until this time, sidewalks in residential areas have been few and far between. When sidewalks have been built, they have been associated with the City's street transportation plan. It was only recently that the City constructed sidewalks in the Autumn Ridge/Ilawthorne Woods addition, and here the sidewalks were placed on arterial streets and not each of the residential streets. With your request being such a departure from established policy, this will be a difficult issue for the City to approve. The other issue we discussed was the trailway leading to the park from 11ackmore Lane. This access will consist of steps and not just a trail because of the topography of the area. For us to achieve an 8 to 9 percent grade, which borders on the fringe of wheelchair accessibility, the City would have to grade extensively into the park and literally destroy that which we had hoped to use for parks purposes. Access for this park for Matthew will he a circulatory route via Dodd Road. As I mentioned to you, the Public Works department 1994 CIP includes the upgrading of Dodd Road from Cliff to Diffley. Requests from the Pinewood PTA have been for a trail on both sides of the Dodd Road. Review of this will be part of the feasibility report in connection with the road reconstruction. Making the assumption that a trailway is constructed on the east side, that trail would take you to Atlantic Hills Drive and then from Atlantic Hills to Lakeside Park. This is obviously not the most direct route, but hopefully it will meet Matthew's needs. o~s MUNCIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY IV PIOI KNOB ROAD 5501 COACHMAN POIN47 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122.1897 THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN. M1104SOIA 551:2 PHONE: (612) 681.4600 PHONE: (612) 681.4300 FAX: (612) 681.4612 Equol Opportuntiy/Afflinx*4e Action Employer FAX: (612) 681.4360 100: (612) OW4535 100: (612) 454.8535 • Mr. & Mrs. Fink Page -2- In closing, I want to thank you for the article that you sent with your letter. I did have copies made for distribution to the City Council which they received some weeks ago. I will be sharing the same with the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission in December. As the agenda is set for that meeting, I will contact you regarding the time and placement on the agenda. Sincerely, i Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation KV/lk cc: Tom Egan, Mayor Tom Hedges, City Administrator L2/FBW-L7R o`~D . October 12, 1993 Mr. Ken Uras Director of Parks and Recreation 3839 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Bear Mr. Braa, 1 am writing you concerning the accessibilitg of the autumn Ridge, Phase 111 subdiuision in Eagan. as per our conuersation on September 29th, 1 am requesting that two issues be discussed at your next meeting on the 15th of October. The first being the placement of a sidewalk on the west side of Bent Tree Lane ( our new home address will be 4359 Bent Tree Lane, Eagen, MN 55123). The placement of a sidewalk on this side of the street will prouide a continuous network of sidewalks through the neighborhood and to Pinewood Elementary School. 1 am requesting this because we will be mouing into the neighborhood in December, 1993. We haue a child who is disabled and requires a wheelchair for mobility. Matthew is a bright 4 gear old who enjoys playing with other children. He will be attending and receiuing special education seruices at Pinewood Elementary school, beginning in fall of 1994. We haue encouraged Matthew to be inuolued with neighborhood children and we haue chosen to liue in this neighborhood because of the many goung families present as well as the auailabilitg of sidewalks. The second issue 1 would like addressed Is the accessibilitg of the park behind the homes on Hackmore Oriue. It is mg understanding that the current path leading from this development is a 19% grade and cannot be altered for geographical reasons. There is a second pathwag planned from Crimson Leaf Trail, which 1 am requesting be made wheelchair accessible if possible. 1 realize that this is an unusual request. The accessibilitg of this neighborhood for Matthew will increase the size of his world tremendously and encourage his Independence for the future, as well as enrich the Ilues of the other families in the neighborhood. i am willing to work with the City Council and the Department of Parks and Recreation on these issues. 1 am including a copy of a recent article in the Star and Tribune about our famlig for Hour Information. Please feel free to call me with ang questions or concerns you mag have at 949-2423. Best Regards, ~~y ~4f 'K Cheri, Andrew and Matthew fink 13988 Chestnut Or. Rpt. 221 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 cc: Tom Egan, Magor Tom Hedges, City administrator MINNL%MLIS STAR TRIBUNE Tuesfty, Jnae 29, 1993 4'/Z and thriving Ong f i 1 Matthew Fk*, famly blessed ; . : with support or P" w. sntltller Ilh. M antow Fit one w bnr h' are eg M .io ..ffi~ ignite 3 tom, a whulw at ~ra1 V" for w ~1ar1 Frraga i llornri flraartar Ir ie~i Goer one a Oaer aver ANro, alatm" Pb* M aaenhorr orb w aeMe Me ntoNOr. chee4 Otte IMti mm Moor Aar auto" of a 91v Tmou VMS S gawk on bill wm pres. low ,sap Me tAay w sea w • Man ~ elai o1 So Aern rgOrs. ltieoM nave 00 r WOO Of Mors. Fin ears, b fie"W4 M ow-won ptoMs, stamen's 11 1 . soy. w~ssapM vaa. onmek ~••M .ne is nm by a MW a olive trap a a11er ' ioiory Met on Me Net arfp st ti Yre Fataa 1"M 499 e mm et wNOw Troll N 1100100 010 In 1vim of AM shoe MW % ,Ma IN0 ~ 0* Oseann s, lb t ms iWhe GW4 tp o w • tIRIMeO a nnaokle Was or prpr. aseaa N hO 0 beast At wao0mr M.- - IIIL he one ma baby sill. a fft tlatYnw aem► t>•f EnWf. "Ves sr1Yt dew aerMp w &ae► orb WOMWO L soNar "V es' At srpss low tAR w tuna are tap wn/ wpriwe d o~1po~►anyr~o IMor klrt, KaNie a11iMr, ilooe. 71M ante wro sy.~p. indAa I . _ • M ooAf•eAifetieAd aaaM• SSTs w w dKM Agri tti anipr _ rAt at Na teen Mina w" a. lie dq M prop i we oswiiv whh inNiaaw- otirt ana, aitlett tlae an asow. _ _ Nn. Tull few slwerer we rat owes", one • qew Nst /lelew i ~DirtG a0 ara~, ~ MollMw Yin to M wAM- •ae01s aat N go Meet kfty. arMr Nor do. "MaN► Iola +w. OAari, oa4 a wooly ft Otero. "lMeaaae i aaoro No V Ma a ft"do ou"M". Ma aria. •1w i parr wya 1 wt . sr artosw Mkra ti trap. a papa- rj wont l o now. Am oran N M ele, Mat a/tl lere~ L Cwrt ~t/r oar /r'o po~aaYlp wl sralt fro test 1 w race soot wan a +fitt tearMi i0 as a alnrtaat low Nw dkgp► Ipial Wnpa. MI ornM Wn a tow Maps I~tt eMp~iARrrwo "ph son~ my• tlal at M pant ff atratatd ' wy Oorn i.leearory. me oft of Chen is a an w own, put uauaar M wits by let airr YtM aM era when 11a1. 1re10irq • par M a just ~nG ~e eemeenn.° Wd's m im m . fo 0 ow flow wall okt Me ow was 'APM'~M Oa ~ ~w0 a we tin Fite rleape tiUek.1M hn Me ' an M autlrr M halo Mrn ~poe NetGt. Ma► hua0arb. Arrererr, r~ an a iwwroo +o lou► heunl a a a00apt en aua+. w'e slowly Donn i aaatt b f}rIA As andeet /7Y► Iles at a etraleA is as M pan hmele. b Mn wYiepen, MM aNe i oraeaex in b•h hr a erop OI wM a1• Crn or w row ' is rut, by pep Yf Al now as No a Maahew•a. fhe WN o d It Far/ 1ap~0sorkfe+Mae ft 010 haMOrne r sI 11a:lnp ft ""M an Cron If 0,0 puss for ra saw d ~~ra~GMr yr orb Orreeloer N. T •w (Na Fib - do0 a ifr a way r1e outein or MI Wow arrn, w ft to an 1M Gone wihM Na W" Dane i Yr seierra a1iMNaa io ivt Metenw alrMtl). she jAO on o Mo "moon OW Wd his r'n•"'oe, put 01" jua 00"ll 1aYe fvrftig w+aOinG one Mmfftw fa V~ ass Oontwah a ON a~- w ~ r+e'a as en arrn waC ap. Trn Finta bro nNeera f st ni pee N be ewe b fn Twt,s iporym. because ft hall. 0A Mt61 out now M spa u . • anoor,raponnnt. NS rou nor . et+oearas. The F.+ta mere oats Yre am so Vie Mtbew wroatae wr• 'p0 96M. A1ea1. wrtM to f?wn at Yea seerate: Wt- asi i b m re t;n'e.'""r''M hoe as on tesatow's Ooey wall go w ,~i"y Oka fthh~ or tpGi me WIM. Fp y.,tAV. s ' m► Tram. v~+ m eu+le a na++ei'~~id aeMOre ens Oem watorr a Spann, am alai iiaM. a!M ftpM i fobwy bow It wo ft ad" MftNMw Mew. fill i /pr ran slot ~nY!!w Oven tMkirq iL... - ~ ~ ~ Y•.~+~~ '~.r. f e±r._~-•Mb aY W. jrJ i " 1•a• ~~w.w••!• T. _ 1 tt srn ♦ a 1 1 / I 1/ "Qr 1 f s•/•.-ti _;11~' ~si\, ♦ lily :1'i~ ~1 T /ii . 1 • - ` a lit.~ ra/e r,.1*~•1 - -,ice,'. •.,,/Y,. i / a\♦ `a 1 f1: ` ~1» j~!•-. ' i ~s ,"~~'ti. ~.i~-= -,1,1 iJ1 1 I it al / M 11 I ~ -r~ ~ ` X ~ ~11 1.11~I.,•/I, ~~a / 1 tj • /t 11 I ~ .1. rj 1 1• c.'! . p~)•y. 11 'ir .~`~`a\ ~ 1 A Iv: • j/` ~t ,f~ •d.~~ ''~~'•JI% ~ / [1J• , _ • , x f1 • • 11~/jJ / It • 1 'i ' i,, '~,/1 . ` 1j1'Ii tt~ ' IS % i/s --777 • ` ~ Ii W ) f! _ 1 a+ ,tea -s • • 'a11~•.•~~ ~ . _ 1 , ~ ~ ♦ - -'1 ~ ~1 1~ s ~ . a al~"~I`\,1~ s - = 1 i /~1 1 ,\1 j I b.~ 1` / q• 111. / ~ 1111 11 [ _ 11 .:I'- -II / , 1 1 is_-. t~O. r ' Y ~ IH`` ` ~ t~C ~ is • • t~Y1~ • 1 1 ;1 ~ 1 1. 1 • • -i at ~-st~ Mw,hM ~ ~~~~~r.. rr ~ • tr 11 • ! 1 ' /17• N pl /I •'111r1~1' ` v J .ay t 1 1j1 M1•>t - II~I~I~Ii"' ,I 1~/~ 1 ~ a'~ .r -ate t •~y WF 604 WF-IF--7rnUF- gas VICINITY MA► i/ •1-- wY s _ 1 y Al. Y~• 1'• '1 ~ q •jM /1, I i 1 t Iv 'iI'.11~ t" ;~IM\ .TAI •w... ~ AVM ~ • t~ • ~ `j 1 V.1 • •1` '_:t ~1 X11 • • _ jS 1 r `P ~ 111 ly , 1, w ~ ~ . ~ • _ N '~+-y'~~~- . 1 ~11` t • %4111 1 ► w ~ ; ~ / ~/t1 : 1 t t w ~•+;1' a 1~~• 1 11;; ~1~~1 ti ~ - ~ y~ ~~•1~ 1V. ~ ~14 ' • ^f11 1 ' ~ 1x11':1\-'~•~'~L. • 1 1 • ~t _ ~ ~ '1. ~ I~,i `t ` 1 1 \ • ~/'sy'> ' • ~ 1 " 1 s 1 ♦ra"y1. 11` aa~,~ ♦ ~ v ~ ( ~ ~ ~1 / ~rr 11 .~C• ` •1-~ ) ..r . r ♦ • 1 Ih F . ..1 ' 1 01:11 1' 1 j• to AO* ~Ly 11=5~J,°~•+ IT I !/I-,~•~t• ~ 1 =~i~: N• ~ ` Lui ' ----~I~ • t1 • • x'11' • , 1 ad y -oir 1 1. 1 live 1 ,I1/ • • ;111;j1 1 1`1\ 1 11 ~'•'1- ./'/1 mot' ~1 1 • 1 ~ 1_L=~-i ~ •s 1 11'111 \ r •`~1 ; ~ - / Ihl' a a ~ r • • F i ~ = ~ \ / •'w•- ~ ~ _ • / ~ . ~ 111 M ~ • , , - . a H• 1 ♦ 1 ssrsr _ _ • V a aaCC 1~ .x• 1 ♦aa. a`~~ ~ 1 .l"~ r' ;a`!.~ ._i~ .i• • • •~s'~- 1 IF 1 r-----, _ ~~1111~. 1 w PROPOSED SIDEWALK MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION JOHN K. VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: JANUARY 31, 1994 SUBJECT: LOCAL OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANTS PROGRAM - PROJECT APPLICATIONS PURPOSE The purpose of this agenda item is twofold: 1) to provide the Commission with the an overview of the local outdoor recreation grants program, and 2) to request authorization of the Commission to submit an application to the Department of Natural Resources for park development projects. GRANTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW History and Context The Local Outdoor Recreation Grants Program, administered by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), provides financial assistance to local governments for the acquisition and development of park and open space facilities. The program was originally established in 1965 by an act of the State Legislature for the purpose of dispersing federal Land and Water Conservation Funds (LAWCON) to local units of government. At the same time, the Legislature created the Legislative Commission On Minnesota Resources (LCMR), a companion funding source for local outdoor recreation projects. In 1990, the State removed the LCMR from the recreation grants program and now provides matching dollars through state biennial bonding appropriations. Since 1965, the program has funded the acquisition of 40,000+ acres of land and the development of 1,700 parks throughout the State of Minnesota. A total of $44.6 million in LAWCON and $52.0 million in State funds have been distributed to nearly 500 cities and counties for the provision of outdoor recreation facilities. man Involvement Since the mid-1970's, the City of Eagan has been an active participant in the Local Outdoor Recreation Grants Program. Among the funded projects include the acquisition and/or development of Blackhawk Lake Park, Thomas Lake Park, Trapp Farm Park, Rahn and Northview Athletic fields, Fish Lake Park and the Highline Trail corridor. Taken together, a total of $1,080,200 in LAWCON and $740,440 in LCMR funds have been received by the City. Currently, the City has no active outdoor recreation grant projects, with the closure of the Blackhawk Lake project in December, 1993. Eligible Projects The DNR recently announced the Outdoor Recreation Grants for the 1995/96 biennium. Projects that will be eligible for grant assistance include park acquisition and/or the development/redevelopment of trails, 1 picnic shelters, playgrounds, athletic facilities, boat accesses, fishing piers, swimming beaches, campgrounds, site preparation, and support facilities, such as restroom buildings, park roads, parking areas and utilities. Available Funding Staff from the local Outdoor Recreation Grants Program are estimating that approximately $250,000 in LAWCON funding will be available in State fiscal year 1995. In addition; the DNR is seeking a $1 million appropriation for the 1995/96 biennium. This level of funding would be consistent with what has been observed during the past four to five years. Project applicants need to fund at least 50% of the total project cost. The local match can consist of cash; donations of materials, labor, and equipment usage; in-kind contributions; or any combination thereof. A minimum of 20% of the local match must be in the form of cash. In addition, no more than 10% of the total project cost may be used for design and engineering services. While there is no maximum eligible project cost, per se, it is clear that the State desires to offer grants to as many eligible recipients as possible, in order to leverage the most acquisition and development activity (given the limited State and Federal funding). Ranking Criteria The criteria used by the DNR to rank project applications are based upon the priorities identified in the 1995-1999 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). Generally speaking, projects which involve the following elements will likely receive a more favorable ranking under the program criteria: trailways, water-based facilities, additions to parks, protection of shoreland areas, redevelopment and renovation of facilities, design considerations, commitment to project, population growth, urban area criteria, accessibility, reduction of liabilities, year-round and multi-use recreation, and partnerships between governmental units. From this list and conversataions with DNR staff, it is evident that the State will continue to focus its funding emphasis on projects associated with natural resource base recreation development. Fun ' Process If the City is interested in applying, it must submit an application request form to the DNR no later than March 15, 1994. If the DNR determines that the projects are eligible for funding, the City must then complete a more formalized application by August 1, 1994. The second application would include additional information such as a schematic site plan, detailed project cost estimate, and other support documentation. Review and ranking of the projects by the DNR will begin in August 1994. Final disposition of the City's application would probably be known by sometime in December. Construction of a project could begin as early as 1995 pending ratification of the grant agreements and detail design work. Any funded project would need to be completed within three years. It should also be noted that the City would not be eligible to receive more than one grant during the 1995/96 biennial period. RECOMMENDATION In consideration of the eligible project list and ranking criteria, staff are recommending that grant applications be submitted for two projects: 1) Development of Patrick Eagan Park, and 2) Development of LeMay Lake (a/k/a Moonshine Park). 2 Both of these parks have been in the park system inventory for a number of years and are now emerging as likely candidates for development in the near term. Both parks have a strong natural resource base and could include facilities which are closely aligned with the project ranking priorities. Patrick Eagan Park A proposal for Patrick Eagan Park would likely include additional trails development, interpretive signage, outdoor learning facilities and an environmental learning center. Support facilities would include parking, signage, lighting, and utility construction. This project could also incorporate acquisition of a "missing" linear park tract lying between Patrick Eagan Park and Windcrest Park. This parcel would serve to connect Patrick Eagan Park and the Caponi Sculpture Gardens with the Eagan Community Center Campus. Although a detailed cost analysis has not yet been done, it is likely that first phase project costs would be in the range of $500,000 - $800,000. LeMay Lake Park LeMay Lake (or Moonshine Park) is located on the southeast comer of LeMay Lake. This project would involve the acquisition of additional land on the east side of the park, along with the development of neighborhood and special use facilities. The development features would probably include a boat access, canoe launch, wading beach, picnic areas, walking trails, fishing pier, open play space, and playground facility. Support elements would include parking, lighting, signage, and seating areas. First phase project costs are roughly estimated at $350,000 - $550,000. The source of matching for these projects would be from a combination of park site funding, operations budget, and in-kind services. FOR COMMISSION ACTION Following a review and discussion, it would appropriate for the Commission to approve, modify, or deny the request to submit an application to the Local Outdoor Recreation Grants Program for the development of Patrick Eagan and/or LeMay Parks (please note: the City may withdraw its application for grant funding at any time up to the point of grant contract execution). Ken Vraa John K VonDeLinde Director of Parks and Recreation Superintendent of Parks JKV/sb 35wp.adWgwJ 031 3 X33 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARK, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM. KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION JOHN K VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 19942 SUBJECT: POLICY FORMULATION ON METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT (MMCD) ACTIVITIES IN THE CITY OF EAGAN Ba ound The Eagan City Council has requested that the Advisory Park, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, working in conjunction with city staff, develop a formal position (city policy) relative to MMCD mosquito control practices in the City of Eagan. The initiative for this request was the result of a research project conducted by Councilmember Pat Awada (as part of the MAPA program at Hamlin University) which examines the efficacy and environmental impacts of MMCD implementation policies. The purpose of this memorandum is to inform the commission of their role in this process and to provide a brief overview of the issue. Current Research Pager A copy of the research project undertaken by Councilmember Awada is attached for your reference. The report includes the following elements: a discussion of agencies which have recently banned or restricted spraying by the MMCD within their jurisdictions, current MMCD oversight, effectiveness of MMCD policy, chemical and environmental issues, mosquito born diseases, financial considerations, and outdoor activity implications. The report concludes with a description of four long-range public policy alternatives for mosquito control in Eagan. Issue The issues for which the commission and staff have been asked to examine and to report their findings are outlined on page 4 of Councilmember Awada's report. Briefly stated these issues relate to: the efficacy of MMCD policy, environmental impacts from chemical use, cost effectiveness of the MMCD program, transmittal of mosquito borne diseases, and feasible alternatives to current policy. 'In addition, the commission is also being asked to carefully review the impact(s) that any changes in MMCD activities would have on the usability of park and recreation areas if mosquito control practices were curtailed or modified under a directive by the City Council. Commission/Staff Role The City Council through City Administrator Tom Hedges is asking the Commission to develop a formal position and recommendation to the City Council on this issue. This will include the development of a formal report and alternatives discussion by department staff, followed by Commission review and the opportunity for public input on the study's findings and alternatives. Following that, the Commission will need to make a formal recommendation to the City Council regarding the optimal long-term policy for the city in relation to environmental, economic and social considerations. In addition to the information presented in Councilmember Awada's report, staff will attempt to amplify the data analysis through the following resources: a survey of other communities which have previously studied this issue; research of additional information available through the University of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Health, and Pollution Control Agency; a survey of the programs and policies in other mid-western states; and a review of the impacts on mosquito populations in non-control areas (communities which have banned the use of chemicals). It is anticipated that a final study will be available for commission review by early fall. For Commission Action This item is presented for informational purposes only and no on is requested at this time. However, the Commission may wish to discuss this issue and provide directio staff relative to scope of research to be done on this policy issue. Ken Vraa jo%j~ 1Y VonDeLinde Director of Parks and Recreation uperintendent of Parks KV/JKV/nab cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Attachment Ilb.apmrc.039 r Mosquito Control Policy in the City of Eagan an analysis of current policy and options for change prepared by Pat Arvada-City Staff for the Eagan City Council 1 "Z t Purpose Last spring, members of the City Council requested that staff perform an in- depth analysis of current Mosquito Abatement Control policy, including evidence on environmental effects, cost and health issues. This report will attempt to define the issues surrounding this policy in the City of Eagan, in hopes the Council can make a well-informed public policy decision. Should the Council decide to go forward with a public hearing, certain people representing both sides of the issue would like to testify. Introduction The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD), governed by a Board of 17 County Commissioners, is mandated by the legislature to control nuisance mosquitos in the seven County metro area. Their mission is to reduce the mosquito population and to suppress mosquito transmitted diseases through chemical spraying and by applying briquets to areas of unhatched larvae. The State Department of Health monitors any mosquito-borne diseases. Commissioners Loeding, Jensen and Richards represent Dakota County. Much discussion has taken place over the last few years concerning the fiscal responsibility and environmental effects of current MMCD policy. Criticism has been leveled against the MMCD spending for extensive capital projects, and for the environmental side effects of the chemicals used to combat mosquitos. 2 Recently, a variety of jurisdictions have banned spraying and other methods of control. Local governments, park districts and individual landowners can legally prohibit chemical treatments for nuisance mosquitos, require notification measures, or allow controls upon request only. A list of those entities that have taken such action are as follows: Cities/Parks that have banned or restricted sRrayi= Minneapolis Park Land All controls prohibited Hennepin County Park Land Adult spraying prohibited St. Paul Parks - Lilydale, Crosby Farm All controls prohibited St. Paul Parks - Hidden Falls Adult spraying prohibited City of Maplewood Adult Spraying prohibited Chanhassen City Parks Adult spraying prohibited DNR Wildlife Management Areas All controls prohibited DNR Scientific and Natural Areas All controls prohibited MN Valley National Wildlife Refuge (U.S. Fish and Wildlife) All controls prohibited Nature Centers- Spring Brook, Woodlake, Dodge, Lee & Rose Warner, Carpenter All controls prohibited There are many people that will be effected by the decision the Council makes on this issue. From the MMCD's perspective, any municipal decision to prohibit eradication efforts and policies puts their reputation in a position of 3 questionability and may affect the overall effectiveness of their regional controls. As taxpayers, our citizens would be paying for a service they would not necessarily be receiving. Should your decision have an adverse effect on the mosquito population, citizens enjoying the outdoors would see a rise in insect bites. From an environmentalist standpoint, an argument can be made that these controls upset the natural balance of food sources for other animals and can be detrimental to water quality and other organisms. This report will attempt to give evidence and each sides position so that the Council can address the following issues when making their policy decision: 1) Do current MMCD policies have an appreciable effect on the mosquito population in Eagan? 2) Are the chemicals used to treat mosquitos environmentally sound? 3) Is the program cost-effective (keeping in mind the fact that Eagan cannot financially "opt out" of the District)? 4) Is there any increased danger of mosquito-bome diseases if we Z were to opt out of the District? 4 5) Are there any feasible alternatives to current policy? 4 ~-Q . Background & Evidence MMCD policy is twofold; to reduce mosquito larvae and to spray for adult mosquitos. Emphasis is on controlling larvae while they are in the water. The District controls adult mosquitos in parks and by request. Adult spraying is a very small part of their program. Of the many different mosquito species in Minnesota, the District controls only those 15 species that annoy people. Only female mosquitos bite. After she fills with blood, she can lay her eggs in water and after a heavy rainfall, they will grow to become larvae. It takes only a few days for them to hatch and become fully-formed adult mosquitos. They then live from 4 weeks to 5 months, depending on the species. MMCD has mapped over 60,000 breeding sites since its inception. Current MMCD Oversight A Technical Advisory Board is composed of representatives from concerned citizens groups and government agencies. They review programs and provide recommendations to the Commission. An independent panel of experts form the Scientific Review Panel, which directs research investigating environmental impacts on wetlands. In four years of research, they have found that the dosage rates used by MMCD are below that which would have an adverse impact on non-target aquatic invertebrate and vertebrate organisms. Some of the studies below are the result of their work. 5 4~. Effectiveness of MMCD Policy While analysis has been done by a variety of groups on the environmental effects of current MMCD policies, I could not find any conclusive research on the actual effectiveness of current policy on reducing the mosquito population over time, although it certainly is effective in the short term (1-10 days). I suspect that while there is no clear evidence that the MMCD policies have any appreciable overall effect on mosquito control, there is also no evidence that they do not, although it has been claimed that mosquito population is more closely linked to levels of spring rainfall than any other factor. One could possibly study mosquito population in rural areas versus the District if the number of breeding grounds were the same. The Council will have the make their own personal judgement on this question. Chemical and Environmental Issues The MMCD sites evidence that the chemicals they use in control have little or no adverse effects on humans or other "important" species. While they do not deny that there are some effects to other species and water quality, they do not believe they are of any consequence. They create and fund on-going research in these areas. Environmental groups, including the DNR and USFWS believe that the possibilities of harm are too large to risk spraying in the areas under their control. They site evidence that shows detrimental effects or is inconclusive. I have presented a brief outline of some of those issues, facts and figures below. There is extensive research in this area if the Council would like more information. 6 The Chemicals The main materials utilized when controlling mosquito larvae are Altosid Briquets and BTi Corncob Granules. They are used to treat water breeding sites where the larvae are hatched. I have included copies of the labels of these chemicals at the back of this report. Altosid Briquets contain a growth regulator, Methroprene (1.8%). This chemical prevents the larvea from maturing. Methoprene is listed as a Biochemical pesticide by the E.P.A. A 1991 E.P.A. re-registration document on Methoprene listed it as a 'Biochemical pesticide' with the following negative caveats: "Methoprene can be characterized as very highly toxic to freshwater invertebrates", and, "the long term exposure resulting from the slow release briquet formulation is of concern to the Agency." (The report further stated) "Because Methoprene is an insect hormone that acts as an insect growth regulator, there is concern that important non target species may be adversely affected by cronic exposure to Methoprene." It is an insect hormone mimic that creates a fatal hormonal imbalance in the larvae. BTi, which is also placed in breeding areas, makes up only .2% of the Corncob granules, but has been found to also cause alarm for environmental reasons. It is toxic to butterflies and moths. Insect resistence has begun. to be reported. Adult mosquitos are sprayed with Punt insecticide (permethrin) or Scourge (resmethrin). According to its label, Punt is highly toxic to bees and fish and it is unlawful to spray it within 100 feet of a lake or pond. It is a central nervcus system poison which acts on the sodium channels in cell membranes. Permethrin is non-biodegradable and is currently on a list of 35 pesticides that the E.P.A. is working to restrict, although in 1991, Permethrin became available commercially. Copies of the labels are attached. While most of the adult spraying is done during the hours of 4-5 a.m., a limited amount of daytime spraying is done for special events. A Minnesota Department of Health study published in 1992, found the two sprays used on Eagan parks (Scourge and Punt) did not present health risks to humans, although certain uncertainties in the data prompted the author to say that he could not say whether inhalation of Scourge posed a significant health risk. The study did state that children should be prevented from having prolonged inhalation exposure to Scourge. This spraying for adult mosquitos repeatedly can be detrimental to "good" bug populations such as butterflies. While it is true that the E.P.A. is reviewing some of the chemicals used in treating mosquitos, they currently have EPA registration and are not classified as harmful if properly used. Other Environmental Concerns As stated before, the chemical treatments have been proven to harm fish, other bugs and plant life. Another concern is the loss of food for those animals who rely on mosquitos for sustenance. 8 A study done in the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge to determine the effects of mosquito control practices on waterfowl invertebrate food resources found that spraying mosquito larvae could be harmful to waterfowl as it dimishes its food supply. They recommended that the Refuge should continue its policy of not allowing any chemical mosquito control because the goal of their comprehensive plan is "to manage the natural resources in order to perpetuate wildlife species and ecological communities' natural diversity and abundance..". The USFWS has adopted the Department of Interior Pesticide Use Policy (517 DM 1) which has the goal to "eliminate pesticide use on Service lands and facilities..." The policy does allow the Minnesota Department of Health to treat areas with BTi when it determines a significant health hazard exists from disease carrying mosquitos. Other studies have shown adverse effects to the mosquito larvea and speculated that chemicals could go up the food chain. In summary, there is not enough evidence that any of the chemicals pose harm to humans or large animals if used properly, although there is evidence that these chemicals are harmful to certain small birds, fish, insects and water quality. The Council will have to make a decision on whether this harm is reason enough to change our policy. Mosquito-Borne Diseases This portion of the MMCD program was budgeted at only $118,000 in 1992. This includes educational programs. The Minnesota Department of Health is responsible for monitoring any mosquito-borne diseases. 9 According to John Solar of the Minnesota Department of Health, mosquitos can carry Encephalitis and infect human beings through bites. Encephalitis is a viral disease that affects children. The symptoms range from none, to flu-like, to mental confusion. In rare cases, Encephalitis can cause death. y There are two kinds of mosquitos which carry this disease, Aedes11~seriatus and Culex Tarsalis. The Aedes mosquito is commonly referred to as the Tree Hole mosquito and is responsible for LaCrosse Encephalitis. They are the most common carriers and are found mainly in SE Minnesota (hence, the name LaCrosse). An average year would see 5 to 10 cases of LaCrosse Encephalitis. The vast majority of these cases are found in the hardwood forests of SE Minnesota. 1988 saw the last case in the metro area. Tree Hole mosquitos do not fly out of neighborhoods, and generally breed in old tires in peoples backyards. An MMDC brochure titled "LaCrosse Encephalitis and the Tr_-e Hole Mosquito" explained that "The MMCD can provide only limited control due to the large numbers of artificial containers residents allow to be placed around their homes." The Culex Tarsalis mosquito roams statewide and is responsible for Western Encephalitis. This disease is named for its favorite victim, the horse. There hasn't been a confirmed case since the mid-1970's. Accordingly, there is extremely minimal risk from mosquito-borne diseases in Eagan, and any change in policy would not significantly increase that risk. 10 Financial Considerations Eagan taxpayers paid $162,868 in 1993 for mosquito control. With approximately 54,000 residents, this equates to $3.02 per resident for the program. This fee is levied as a property tax through a Special District. Should the City of Eagan choose to not allow spraying in Eagan, we are not able to "opt out" of the District. Therefore, the tax will be levied whether the city is treated or not. In 1993, the MMCD had an annual budget of $9,917,685, and had not raised its budget in three years. This money was used for administration, the control program and research. From 1990 to 1993, the MMCD spent over $8 million dollars on capital projects. This included such things as a new headquarters and research facility, and was the focus of much criticism last year. Because we cannot financially opt out of the District, the Council will have to make a determination based on grounds other than saving our citizens money. It can be argued that by Eagan opting out, it would cost the District less money to run its programs and therefore save taxpayers in other cities money. It can also be argued that by banning spraying it would increase the chances that the MMCD will be dissolved by the Legislature, thereby saving all taxpayers money. Again, the Council will have to decide what its goals are in order to give meaning to these financial considerations. 1 1 !.~-7 • - Human Outdoor Activity Concerns In 1993, the MMCD published research on acceptable levels of human annoyance from mosquitos. They found that the average threshold of when people will go indoors is when mosquito bites reach a level of 3 per 5 minutes. This generally happened around 8:00 pm. It was found that the peak hours people are outdoors are from 5 to 8 pm. Mosquito activity begins around 7 pm, is moderate at 8 pm, and peaks around 9:30 pm. The average time respondents come inside is 7:47 pm., and the average time they would come in if their were no mosquitos was about 8:44 pm, which was about 1 hour before the 9:30 peak annoyance time. You can see on the following attachment that their is little time humans and mosquitos currently share their heavy period out-of-doors. The study also argues that it is possible that mosquitos drive people indoors before the peaks. Again, a simple comparison between us and areas of the country without bugs would answer that question. 12 M1NCD Interior Report to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board May, 1993 Figure Two: Relationship Between Reported Bites and Planned Outdoor Time 120 90 • ~ o E c 60 • 0 0 ~ Y 0 0 as E 30- 0 a E" 0- 0 0 median • -°-mean 0 • 0 p N en Q %M %C oo O O ^ t o rL r~ ^ N Bite count (mosquitoes) Source: Review Draft, Public Perception of Mosquito Annoyance: Results of a Survey and Simultaneous Mosquito Sampling: Nancy Read and Jay Rooker, Metropolitan Mosquito Control District, St. Paul, Minnesota 13 ' MMCn interim Report to ATinnesota Environmental Quality hoard May, 1993 CD Time outdoors (hrs.) O C 1 _ M 0 8 S M Cn ° o 2 M C o N ' tD o O Cr C, O. mn~c-; o' 3 3 ~ ~ co Eo m 5 5 ^ ^ yM = 5 d g 0 co C K S .o ^ co N g 8 O° p ° ,2' 3 3 E N N O C0 ^ A A C t~. 1 M c W' ^ o o C/) 0 s a a ILA q 0(0 D y y ~ 0 o~ • ° c M _ c O tit M C 3aH o 060 pt L O N N C_ O H N - W A O Mean trap count (mosquitoes caught per 5 min.) 07 14 Specific considerations for Eagan An important policy issue for Eagan is presented by its proximity to the Refuge. Approximately one-third of Eagan's border falls along this Refuge. If this area is not being sprayed and mosquitos have the ability to fly up to S miles per day, it can be assumed that we have a "mosquito breeding ground" next door. It also presents environmental issues. Any spraying or laying in wetlands done near the Refuge may seep into it. The Council should also consider what effect, if any, the number of children in Eagan should have on its decision. Chemicals can be harmful to children if improperly used, and most children are not outside during the "peak periods". On the other side of the argument, spraying in parks can have a substantial short-term effect on the adult mosquito population and children are most likely to use the parks. Alternative Means of Control There are a few alternative means of control advocated by environmentalists. The main ones include bats and other natural predators. Studies have shown that they eat mosquitos as a part of their diet, and research encourages their use as part of a program. At least in the short term, these solutions are impractical for Eagan. 15 Policy Alternatives Laid out below are some options the Council can choose from, or use to formulate other policy goals. Each option would accomplish certain goals. r Option One - Keep the Status Quo If the Council finds there is not substantial evidence for change, the correct course would be to leave current policy in place. Substantial arguments can support this position. In years of research, little evidence has been found that MMCD policies harm the natural environment. What harm does come from laying or spraying has not had a significant effect on any specific population over time. Evidence certainly shows that there is no harm to humans if the chemicals are used properly. While risk of mosquito-borne diseases is insignificant, an argument could be made that that is partly due to MMCD policies. Certainly, risk could rise if the MMCD is completely abolished. While enviromentalists and certain federal government agencies take a contrary position, it could be said that by virtue of their interests (environmental protection), they may have gone one too far on this issue. 16 Option Two - Keen Current Policy in Place but Do Not Allow Spraying for Adult Mo uuitos This is the option taken by Hennepin County Parks, the cities of Chanhassen and Maplewood. The MMCD is currently considering going to a policy of only spraying for adult mosquitos on request. Choosing this option would not jeopardize the overall MMCD regional plan, as their policy is to concentrate on unhatched larvae. There would be no increased risk of disease, and no possible rise in the mosquito population. This choice would have little effect on the long-term viability of the MMCD. Environmental groups would see it as a "win", as some restrictions are better than none, and the danger from children being harmed by the spray would be eliminated. Choosing this option would not solve the possible problem of proven dangers to other wildlife, including water gLality and Refuge sepage. Our taxpayers would still be getting "protection" for their dollar. 011tion Three - Allow S ra, ing for Adult Mosguitos_ but Do Not Allow the Killing of Unhatched Larvae, The logic behind this option is that it helps eliminate the problems in the above paragraph, while still providing some relief in parks and for special events. There are also some reasons to choose this policy. If the Council believes that the MMCD's policy is ineffective in reducing the mosquito population over time ~y 17 or that the possible side-effects of the chemical treatments are too much to justify continuing the current policy, (or simply that they question the MMCD's continued existence), this option would accomplish those goals. Since our taxpayers would continue to pay for their services, it would be logical to allow them to do the adult mosquito spraying rather than do it in-house. This option would probably be the least noticeable to our citizens (except option one). With the 5 mile per day flight distance and possible ineffectiveness of MMCD policy in reducing the population, simply spraying areas where people are outdoors (parks etc.) would keep mosquito levels stable. Option Four - Ban the MMCD from Eagan Choosing this option would put Eagan in line with most other jurisdictions that have studied this issue. Again, this would eliminate all concern about second- order environmental effects and could be seen as keeping in line with our "environmental quality" image (atrough one could argue that a healthy environment includes lack of mosquitos). If the Council believes MMCD policy is ineffective or that the environmental consequences are too strong, this policy would be the logical alterative. The consequences of this action are broad. With more and more jurisdictions "opting out" of the District, it puts the MMCD's regional policy (and continued existence) in jeopardy. There could also be possibilities that our citizens would see a rise in insect bites or diseases. While our citizens would be paying for a service they did not receive, there would be the possibility that eventually no one would be paying for this program through elimination of the MMCD. 64. 18 EvaluatinglMonitoring/Future Study Any of the options the Council chooses will require some monitoring and evaluation in the future. Research is constantly being generated on both sides of the issue, and I would believe a future "appeal" by the losers would be enivitable. If the Council chooses to restrict some activity, staff could set up a system to monitor the mosquito population over time, and could log the number of complaints over the present. If there is any outbreak of mosquito-borne diseases, the Department of Health will require elimination of diseased mosquitos in Eagan. Any change in policy will not affect this area. Conclusion Again, there are certain fundamental questions which we were not able to answer, such as whether there is any long-temp decline in the mosquito population or whether a lack of mosquitos would encourage later (after 8 pm) outdoor activities. These questions could be answered by comparing areas of no mosquitos or no controls with Eagan. Staff does not have the resources to collect this data, but if the Council desires, it can hire someone to collect the appropriate information. I hope this information is helpful. Should you desire, we can schedule a public hearing in January and invite both sides and the public to testify. 19 Evidence Cited: Charbonneau. Effects of a Mosquito Control Practice Using Bacillus Thuringiensis Var. Iaraelensis on Waterfowl Invertebrate Food Resources. Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; 1991 Mitchell. Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Environmental Assessment of Mosquito Control Activities of Refuge Lands; 1988 Mitchell, Myths about mosquito control (bats, birds, and bug zappers). Vector control Bull. of the North Central States 2(l):35-40. 1993 MMCD. Specifying Acceptable Levels of Human Annoyance from Mosquitos. MMCD Interim Report to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. 1993 MN Department of Health, Risk Assessment on Scourge and Punt 57-OS. Materials used by the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District for the Control of Adult Mosquitos. 1993 20 l • • 0 T c• ` O , ~ . ~ ~ m~ :1 L/ 7,0et,0I1 AitC)Slmd@XR EXTENDED RESIDUAL BRIQUETS p• A SUSTAINED RELEASE PRODUCT TO PREVENT ADULT MOSQUITO EMERGENCE ACTIVE INGREDIENT. ISWelhoprenellsopropyl (2F-4E 7S)-1 I -methoxr3.7.1 I -trimethyl-2-4-dodecadjenoalel' (Dry weight Basis) i a% INERT INGREDIENTS: 98.2% • • OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION NET W. 2.9 LBS (1.32 kg RYWEIGHTBAS8 CONTAINS 36 BRIMEM INTRODUCTION: ALTOSID XR Briquets are designed to release Coq Oeffidfa and Mansonia spp.: For application to caeail marshes. and effective levels of Methoprene insect growth regulator over a period up water hyacinth beds. For control of these mosquitoes, place 1 Briquet to 150 days in mosquito breeding sites. Release of Methoprene insect per 100 it! growth regulator occurs by f"ssotution of the briquet. Soft mud and loose APPLICATION SITES: ALTOSID XR Briquets are designed to cc sediment can cover the t- . =-s and inhibit normal dispersion of the mosquitoes in small bodies of water which a not known fish habits..,. active ingredient. The proou:; -nay not be effective in those situations Examples of application sites are: s, catch basins, roadside where the briquet can be removed from the site by flushing action ditches, ornamental im2wo s Is and septic tanks. ALTOSID XR Briquets prevent the emergence of adult mosquitoes waste Ire Intent ng I de . ransformer vaults. including Anopheles. Culex. Culisera. CoquiUetndia. and Minsonfa, spp. qessio o sw1 I I ion and other man-made as well as those of the flooo:••iter mosquito complex 1Aede Cana er hyacinth beds, pastures. meadows, Psoropnors spp.) from treated w,•.ar. Treated larvae con a lds, er swamps and marshes. salt and lidal marshes. normally to the pupal stage where iney die. nd pools, flood plains and dredge spoil sites. NOTE: Iethoprene. an in r utator I I age and Disposal: mosquitoes whit or ge prior to treatment. Storage: Store in a coot place. Do not contaminate water, food or feed by storage Of dfspOSal. Wastes resulting from use of this product may be PRECAUTIONS: o p o known fish habitat. disposed of on site or at an approved waste disposal facility. Do not DIRECTIONS FOR USE: 11 is a violation of Federal law to use this reuse empty container. product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling. Disposal: Triple rinse for equivalent), than offer for recyfing or re• APPLICATION TIME: Placement of ALTOSID XR Briquets should be at conditionswi. Dispose in a sanitary landfill. or encel rate. or, it allowed by or before the beginning of mosquito season. ALTOSID XR Briquets can State and IOcal authorities, by burning. If burned, stay out of smoke. be applied prior to flooding when sites are dry, or on snow and ice in S~ "fares rw *OFF". eaw"s ar Ww"d• come" d1a use of 1M Oro" oowr OW rwealad on ea IaaN. Surer esswna as nar of use and hsrwarq of eea MaHmaf breeding sites prior to spring thaw. Under normal conditions, one slreh 1,..Olio IMmO a ere =maq jo "w:o"caom application should last the enure mosquito season. or up to 150 days. whichever is shorter. Alternate wemng and drying will not reduce their effectiveness. EPA Rec. No. 2724-42144M wade in USA Sold by Cttoo bacon APPLICATION RATES: Aedes and PsonVhors spp.: For control in non: Wetor Ummle new ohftkm Pw"ee,n USA (Or low-) flow shallow depressions (less than 2 feet in depthl, treat on the A S Sand A W401 a Zoeeon Corooraaan EPA Ear No 29774• TIC- 1 oz COTPenr 2724-TX-1 basis of surface area. placing t Briquet per 200 it! Briquets should be 12200 Denton ante. oases. Tees 75231 placed at the lowest areas of mosquito breeding sites to maintain For e+famalwneaa 1.400.21••77.3 continuous control as the site apernately floods and dues up. ALTOS40 is a uaonnarr of sarwas Lid. - , Culex. Cuasets and Anopheles spp.: Place 1 ALTOSID XR Briquet per Z0(!('.011 100 ft! Ar.ers rlae w tree, aefeq ua.q ar oraaurl 93.21.0017 76 J !.t!('' X1. Altoslud"' PELLETS MOSQUITO GROWTH REGULATOR A GRANULAR PRODUCT ADULT MOSQUITO EMERGENCE ACTIVE INGREDIENT: INEFTT r KEEP I OF REACH OF CHILDREN -CAUTION NET 1 1 1 I Precautionary Statements Use lower rates when water is shallow, vegetation and/or pollution ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS: Do not apply to known fish habitat. a•e minimal and mosquito populations are low. Use higher rates DIRECTIONS FOR USE: it is a violation of Federal law 10 use this wnen water is deep (),,2 ltl, vegetation and/or pollution are high and ; Product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling, mosquito populations are high. INTRODUCTION: ALTOSID Pellets release AL''- =10 insect growth APPLICATION METHODS: Apply ALTOSID Pellets up to 1S days regulator as they erode. ALTOSID Pellets prove, ae emergence of prior to flooding, or at any stage of larval development after flooding ' adult standing water mosquitoes, including 2uJIM a :1 Culiseta spp.. as or in permanent water saes. Fixed wing aircraft or helicopters well as adults of the floodwater mosquitoes such as yedes.Ancoholits • equipped with granular spreaders capable of applying tales from 2.S and Psoroohora sop. from treated sites. . 10 IbWocr* may be used to apply ALTOSID Pellets. The Psllois GENERAL DIRECTIONS: ALTOSID Pellets release effective levels of may also be applied using ground equipment which will achieve ALTOSID insect growth regulator for up to 30 days under typical emri• good even coverage al the above rates. ALTOSID Pellets may be mnmentaf conditions. Treatment should be continued through the last applied to artificial containers such as tires and catch basins, etc. brood at the season. Treated larvae conimue to develop normally to the pupal stage where they die. STOP A.. SDISPOSAL: Store dosed containers of ALTOSID " Pella cool, dry place. Do not contaminate water, load or feed NOTE: This insect growth regulWor has no effect on mosquitoes which by S; or disposal. Wastes resulting from the use of this product have reached the pupal or adult'stage prior to treatment. may • . isposed of on site or at an approved waste disposal lacdity. ! APPLICATION SITESAND RATES: T60orinse (orequivalent).Then offer farrecycling orreconditioning. HABITAT RATES (LbwAcre I or puncture and dispose of in a sanitary landlilt, or. A allowed by state S Floodwater slits and local authorities. by burning. N burned, stay out of smoke. Pastures, meadows. ricelields, freshwater swamps and WARRANTY AND CONDITIONS OF SALE: Seller makes no war. marshes, salt and tidal marshes, woodland pools. lbodplains. fires. Cher artificial water holding containers 2.5 • S rally. express or implied, concerning the use of this product other 1 than indicated on the label. Buyer assumes all risks of use and Dredge spoil silos. waste treatment settling ponds. ditches handling of this material when such use and handling are contrary to and other man-made depressions 5.10 label instructions. I Permanent water slits aft a" w. x►t-64"40n Mom.. USA Ornamental ponds and fountains, flooded crypts. saes„ elm ze.e•r transformer vaults, abandoned swimming pools, construe- Vmw rwe.rlew am@%" F. twit w IMA tier and other man-made depressions, treeholes, other A Ok"an a ze.ee.. Cneen.e.. EPA Ea He are a• 1 I A Serest Come" artificial water holding containers 2.5-5 Ittsoo o~ or.s. oese, rs.s. 7x:34 Fer WORN~ ell 14100-14W 77e3 Storm drains, catch basins, roadside ditches, cesspools, ALTOS O r a0 Sown Lie r septic tanks, waste treatment sealing ponds 5-10 AIwM AM M Nita Oe1r. vs..q ell ORC.RI. •2•~IdOS~ ' I I 78 ~ t zoievtN1. Altosid" Liquid Larvicide CONCENTRATE PREVENTS EMERGENCE OF ADULT FLOODWATER MOSQUITOES ACTIVE INGREDIENT. INERTINGREDIENTS: 80% ingredient KEEP OF RF-AC14 OF CHILDREN CAUTION • •r. 640 fl. oz. (5 gals.) 182 t Because of the untoue mode of action of ALTOSID Liquid Larvicide Mosquito Application Sties - Pastures' A.L.L. may be applied alter each flooding Growth Regulator. successful use requires familiarity with $Pe=l techniques vdhoul removal of grazing livestock. recommended for application timing and treatment evaluation. See Guide to Rice: A.L.L. must be applied to 2nd. 3rd artdfor 4th insist larvae of mosquitoes Product Application or eonsull local Mosquito Abatement Agency. found in rice, usually within 4 davs after flooding. Use only where mulhole PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Gooding rice culture is practiced. A.L.L. treatment may be repeated with HAZARDS TO HUMANS • CAUTION: Causes moderate eye irritation. Avoid IloodN . Do not apply after ice reaches the heading stage of growth. contact with eyes or clothing. Wash thoroughly with soap and water alter intermittently Flooded Noncrop Areas: A.L.I. may be applied as directed ha ndkng. • above when flooding may result in floodwater mosquito hatch. Typical saes w ' r ' a* It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a include freshwater swamot and marshes. woodland Pools and meadows. manner inconsistent with its labeling. dredging sport sites. drainage areas. wasle•Irealmeni and settling ponds. Chemigatlon: Refer to supplemental labeling entitled Guide to Product ditches and other natural and man-made depressions. Around estuarine areas. Application for use directions for chemtgatton. Do not sooty tlks product treat high scan marsh or tidal merah Awe nieilin high tide W11er level. IMOugh any w"gatton system unless the supplemental labeling on Chr"800191 Dense vegetation or canopy A& Applj/ an A.L.L. sand mixture using is Wowed. standard granular dispersarequtphentr for detailed Preparation instructions. INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE - I. SNAKE WELL BEFORE USING. A.L.L." refer to Guide to Product ApplkatlOhM may separate on standing and must be thoroughly agitated onor to otitow. Mlxinff and Mantlling instructions: I Add measured amount of A.L.I. to 2. DO not nix with Oct; use clean ettttrpmenl. 3. Partially lilt spray tank with ryaL 11proy lank Partially filled *dh water. rrnx and complete ftain0 with recommended ausnity of water 2. Use tahited spray sokrltpn within 4a hpUrt of mixing. water. then add the recommended amount of A.L.L.. agitate and Complete ' litl'ng. Mild agitetton during application is destrable. 4. Spay solution sh&W bi;.!'0 Agh.le be&e each' use. used within 48 hours. Always agitate before spraying. , -t v c% lk „ STORAGE 6 DISPOSAL: Store in cool Place. away from other vesttcrrlts. RECOMMENDED APPLICATIONS - Introduction: AL.L~m It bd~a0 d ~r~ food and feed In case of leakage or said. soak up with sand or another ?ltd, 3rd. or 4th larval insists of floodwater mosquitoes to drevAnl adult absorbent material. Triple "rise or equivalent Then offer for recycling or emergence. Treated larvae COmentre nornWdevelooritem t61hi Ducal stage orow r. 9 slowed by State ale snit B puncture end local l s auoose of in a sanitary landfill. a sla out of where they, die. This insect growth rigt idr his no effect %hen applied to smoke. Wastes use of this burning. II Dunned. stay out on pupae or adult mosquirooo. A.L 11 has sufficient kid We 10 be effecave at ~ or.al On wastes approved rved waste from disptheosual se Inc" 1 s o not product t c onta may min ate ca'pp'water. ed of on recommended rates whaA?ppited.l0 larval stages under varying field d IncDO loud or sa conditions. For further innformiMon.110 bufde to Product Application. by storage or disposal. est Methods of Application -A'AS&I Use the racommended amount of A.L.L. ow a-,=wo an ow with Ore's « Humes a c°"eo n'• or use use era nar ow hat a e;d ••fts n. m t•wrw fisted below in sufficterit water to give complete coverage. One-had to S gala. of wren wreh,ue cane rtrrg Itanewq are rxrrrraey a NOM annrnrekarrs. spray solution per acre is usually satisfactory. Do not apply when weather COndtions favor drift from area treated. e/A r4q lie. 11724."414441 =1 Ma" -LISA "I c" Ground: Determine the averse spay vokene tried per acre by individual Sa1°Or '1" Z I)SA operators andror specific equipment. Mix A.L.L. in the appropriate volume of Ao1wito Mn Of zwcar c a.•n IIM Esr. No sloe r•G water to give the rate per acre recommortded below. A Sanest Cain"" Application Rate: to ro i 0m'• T•mM r Apply 3l4 to t G. oz. of A.LL per we (5510 73 rrtl'Itacrarel sw w.ronn.u•r. w r.eoo•a.e•r:es it water as directed. ALT030 arts A L 4 are •aasnsms d ItanOSx Lid ".244015e At.avs nla• IN W M b•Im• vitro M a•arc+ 80 • Bactimos° Granules GRANULAR LARVICIDE FOR CONTROL OF MOSQUITO LARVAE DEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION ACTIVE INGREDIENT: Bacillus thumviensrs Berliner var. isrpbn. srs, Serotype M-14l, fermentation product: equNalent to 300 Interns- CONDITIONS RATES (lballaere) tonal Toxic Units pTUI Andes dwyMb jAAI pw mg of formulated product fWMO m othool.......... 2.5% Pools. ponds. flood water. pastures, INERT INGREDIENTS 97.5% ditches. riceffalds. brackish water, 4 - 7.5 TOTAL 100.0% light to moderate populations or 136.1 million ITU (MI per pound formulated product IWHO mothodl Catch basins, kdal water, sap i marshes, storm water retenlion areas, 7 S • 10 PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS: mangrove swamps, moderate pollution )UAZ>.,GS TO HUMANS: Avoid Contact with or organic content eyes or open wounds. ' ENVIRONMENTAL 'HAZARDS: Do not contaminate water when Allow 24 hours for Control. Under certain conditions such as sewage disposing of equipment washwaters. DO not apply directly to treated, waste lagoons. high pollution or organic Content, heavy vegetative finished drinking water reservoirs Of drinking water reesplaelas. cover, high populations, the above appncauon rates may be doubled. DIRECTIONS FOR USE: TREATMENT OF SCRAP TIRES It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with rte tsgebnq. MefhOd of Application. Baetlr• :a (BTI) Granules can to scattered by hand to we swckpdes or u.. d directly b individual ores. Apply a to 20 pounds granules acre with aircraft or ground equip- ALWAYS WEAR PROTECTIVE E EQUIPMENT (GOGGLES AND ment Use the nigher rates to heavily polluted water, when popula- RUBBER GLOVES WHEN HANOLINU AND APPLYING THE GRAN- bons are rugn, when larvae we nearly grown or in fourth onstar, and ULES BY HAND. when aquatic or covering vegetation is dense. Most vestments require no more than 5 or d pounds/acts. Apply only when mosqui- Application can also be made we a mechmmej spreader. Was are larvae. not pupae. Rate of Appeeahon: Securnos' Granules must be scattered over the top of scrap re pries such that the interior ores in Me ode are STORAGE AND DISPOSAL: adequately covered. Granules can be placed directly on individual Do • nor contaminate water, food or lead by storage or disposal of fire at fires stored on racks. Ten (10) to twenty (20)' granules will waste. adequately treat a ore, depending On me size and amount of water of retains. One on- of Bectunoa' Granules will treat between 45 to Storage: Tightly recloss containers of caused granules. Store in a 60 passengw car was. cool. Cry area. Treatment SeMdu/e: The most effective and coal o ienent use of Pesticide Disposal Wastes resulting from the use of this product may Baetlmea" Granules would be to completely treat erne snore scrap be disposed of on site or at an approved waste disposal facility to we ode nnverdory ONCE EVERY TWO WEEKS during ate mosquito accordance with federal and local regulations. "smaln Container Disposal. Completely amply bag into application equip- ment Then dispose of amply bag in a sanitary landfill or by mcwlera- WARRANTY: NOVO NORDISK MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MER- bon. or, it allowed by state and local authorities. by own". It burned, CHANTABIUTY, FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE, OR OTHERWISE, way out of smoke. EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. Concoming gum product or its uses which extend beyond Via use of the product under formal conddions in accord with the statements made on IMS IabeL In no ease snap the saewm* is a regadwed eadMAM Of MOM PNrdisa At$ . - "Nw be babili for consequanka1, or tndirea damages resulting from ate use Of ha-4" of this product AN Such Oaks shag be assumed by me buyer. EPA Reg. No. S8998-2S Manufactured For; EPA Est No. 00130-IL-001 Novo Nordisk EPA Ell No. 919e•ON-001 33 Turner Road Danbury, CT 06613.1907 Lot No.: - Net Content: 40 IbS. 5/8 MESH 84 I r PUNT TM 57=OS INSECTICIDE A SYNTHETIC PYRETHROID FOR E'=ECTIVE SPACE AND BARRIER CONTROL OF ADULT MOSQUITOES, GNATS, SITING AND NON-BITING MIDGES, BLACKFLIES AND OTHER BITING FLIES FOR APPLICATION ONLY BY MOSQUITO ABATEMEN. DISTRICTS, PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS, AND TRAINED PERSONNEL OF OTHER MOSQUITO CONTROL. PROGRAMS ACTIVE INGREDIENT: Permethrin: (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl cis/trans 3-{2.2-dichloroethenyl) 2.2-dimethyl, cyclopropanecarboxylate 57.00% INERT INGREDIENTS' 43.00% TOTAL 100.0% / CisArans isomer ratio min. 35W+/-)cis and max. 6S%b(./-)frans. U.S. Patent No. 4.024.163. 'Contains a Petroleum Distillate Solvent. This product Contains 3.0 tbs. Technical Permethnn/Gallon 'TRADEMARK OF VECTEC. INC. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION "PRECAUCION AL USUARIO: Si usted no lee Ingles, no use este producto haste quo Is etiqueta hays sido explicado amplfamente" STATEMENT OF PRACTICAL TREATMENT IF SWALLOWED: Call a physician or Poison Control Center immediately. If possible vomiting should be induced under medical supervision. 'Solvent presents an aspiration hazard. Gastric lovage is indicated if material was taken Internally. Do not induce vomiting or give anything by mouth to an unconscious or convulsing person. IF IN EYES: Flush eyes with plenty of water. Get medical attention if irritation persists. IF ON SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing and wash affected area with soap and water. IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air. Apply anificial respiration it indicated. SEE SIOE/BACK PANEL FOR ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS CAUTION: Harmful it swallowed or absorbed through the skin. Avoid contact with eyes, on skin. or clothing. Wash thoroughly after using and before eating or smoking. Avoid contamination of food and food. Launder clothing before reuse. Cover animal drinking water 6 lead before treating feedlots. etc. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS This pesticide is highly toxic to fish. Do not apply to any body of water or wetlands (swamps, bogs, marshes. and potholes). Drift and runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in treated areas. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment washwaters. This pesticide is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment on blooming crops or weeds. Do nor apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds while bees are actively visiting the treated areas. NET CONTENTS _ GALLON EPA REG. NO. 42737.1 EPA EST. NO. 10370 TX-1 VECTEC, INCORPORATED ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32807 88~' ' I+ PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL HAZARDS TRUCK MOUNTED "ULV" EQUIPMENT • Do no use. pour, spell or sra11 near ti al at upon its,,. For 'luck rtldLonteQ ndn.•nerrrtal UW equipment mts this product with DIRECTIONS FOR USE oatrned soybean al, signs mensal oil of 54 second viscosily of andlnel suitable non•p"otoxic solvent. Adjust equipment to deliver spray par. If Is a vataleon of Federal taw a Lobe meis Muduct to a oclef of 6 to 20 microns mass median diameter. Consult the following manner inconsistent with its aoekng crisis for dilution and application rates See 'SOLVENT STORAGE: Storeproductinisoriginaltabetodcohlamertosnamtseem FOR DI T67 O paragraph on eft panel for an appropriate al for diluting PUNT S7 OS. temperatute, cry. IOCketl. pace Oefegnated for such insecticides and out of reach of cntloren it product is exposed to temperatures oelow, 40 degrees F crystallization may result in which case, move product and warm lo 60 degrees F and thoroughly nits Do not use open Harm b warm product Do not contaminate water, food or feed by storage or disposal. M Case of spisldge, soak up with absorfoent malorut souca AM sawdust. Of Outlets !Attn: sweep up died plate in a ldbaaw CWh iu"•'"a 011 1Q'95iylf M s/ ter •1 IS e Drie.e w. r ailixxN a layer Weep tamer and dispose of as follows. P€STICIDE OISPO&AIi-- Peshc,0e wastes are lout. Improper disposal nil excess petpoeide, spray rtes. lure. or rtnsate is s violation a Federal taw 11 these wastes cann01 suet. of uaaiw.e at t Is 9 msr le Ina a 10 1111pp a at 20 20 ore disposed of by use according w Idbel instructions t:ontact your ess►.t.rtew t~~fwrso wu p~iin a s mpa r a more a I mipri Sate Pesticide or Enveoremental C4mroi Agency, Of the HAZaro6u3 Waste representative p the nearest EPA Awpotow Olfice to, guidance. QkQ= Lose 1 Is rid I us iii w %blik " S 7 ay 14 ay I 221 mt CONTAINER DISPOSAL: (Metal( Triple rinse at equwataa. Than offer 10.19 ez.l an oz.) m77 of I for racwhng reconditioning or puncture woo dispose of in a sYn awv Animnil of {►r4 speav trs.wre so lip per fruit Mde . 44 a mt. or 231 cu. landfill or by other approved Sate and local procedures (Plasicl Triple rinse or equivalent. Then offer for recVcWq or toeonOdionmg or punt- Q1 viii 19 011.164 ei.eA a 1 my 67 lilt tta M. ter my lure and dispose of in a sanitary landfill or mlctt,tatton, or. it a1Wwe0 Os ".I (Us ea.l (7.71• sit.) by State and wAt awhorwNS. by booming It tam,d. stiiy out a smoke. Ammae a QSW seuy 0ayteae r We Par Lnaa Mile • aa4 alt of 231 a. Q41t Uv ]a rill s] w W yELiryjlljg n a loll 226 ft, -1,6 0111 ' 10]9 or., ton of 1 (/34 on., INSECTS CONTROLLED A1101N1 at k*w f0'ar minas to was Door Lmw vile • 136 lose a 462 at. This product K recommended lot OUTOOO14 SPACE AND 13ARRIER QP Ube ]e me if 2a or N of a t loot ash I to my 22S 0n1 aSb m CONTROL of ADULT MUSOUITOES. LAIOGLS fueling and iqn-foiling), ~S or•1 (771 ot.) ltS11 oz.1 BLACKFLIES. DEER FLIES AND OTHER BITING FLIES such as 'DOG A'"01"" a Q!tl!!t Way """'acid exit a' I"& isra • 13W Feel. of 11626 at. FLIES" by use of specially designed norMhermal spray equipment capable of delivering the panic;@ sites spucdiesi Our each type of heat. Vigor Low e a 01. 14 *.a&A 1ti"" I 159 as ]t s mi 636 ON. mein below. 11 r1, especially effective fw ruduuhy mosquito annoyance (OS] W.i It Oa ".l (2 15 61.1 Undifemois and the contra of mosquitoes that may act as Wsedse tiansm ning agents Aawwr of !pray msxttera p we Oar t.yiur Miss . q0 nil of tat W. 'SOLVENT FOR DILUTION: PUNT 57 OS waif not Oduts in water. If may be applied as is or diluted with an loll mixture or t pin soybean off in Uea ve 111 at W a t a f ew. in" 30 ft. 6]6 not. 2 pans of a 54 second viscosity matenu ad or any and "non•piwwlosti;" as =.l 41071, et.) (2131,`.) ULV suitable oil. Moen of Q&i Ware matters to we par Lnaa Miss • 1.91 I. a 613 01. g:i use 7t. nv t2 S ot.eiA {~0r_synsy 222 my via ma air ad. 91ARRIER SPRAY Cft%f 116M l Its Loa 1 AO at ) WHERE TO USE Amioen of Une ovives sway ae.ttera to we ea Lauer Mile . 2" 1. or 908 et Areas that may be treated for memo control includes but are not limited oz. a Fluid Ounces; ml. a msadters; to Animal Houses. Corrals. Feedlots. Dews-on Hdsautams alto Theaters, 1. in ales 11 Find puttee a 2937 ml,) Gardens. Playgrounds, RecroJtidnat Acess. Zous. Packs. Campsites. •Dnution totes other then t to 9; Woodlands. Atntstic Fields. Gulf Cextrses. Urban Areas, Resiowtuat Areas such as; -11 to 1S" or -11 to 29" on" also be used. and Municipalities around the outside Of apannent buildings, re$WW&MS, stores and warenouses. To obtain optimum results, cover the amm ocome surroundings of housing and buiwatgs. including platy lt,ge SWISCeS. where mosquitoes may rest. For large recrealiomot areas such as Fool. bell Fields, Slooiums. Racetracks and Public Parks, also apply to free "interface of woods" surrounding •ne main area. 00 not apply more than IMPORTANT ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS once in a 24 hour period. THAT AFFECT INSECT CONTROL Do not allow spray treatment to drift on pasture land. Cropland, poultry Temperaure A humeoi'y fluctuations may require Poil0dical aqustments ranges or water supplies. Do not use an crops used ldr food, forage or pasture. Under no concision snoulo open water be treated with Ohl$ Pro' of equipment q tdokvw Of wo must the desued now tau p tM sf>enlad speed due. Nor b be used within 1W 11 (30 metersl of lakes and Messina. M it". Time now tau trWst 0m lnarntarned b Insole IM dtprtbu'ton of the c treatment of Colrain, led loss. Zoos. cover lily weipttse0 OrNIMt1y wallet. proper amuert of act" utgrndrent per acto. Oplrlnum C014101 15 acflreved drinking fountains and alernit lead bwwe 31*11146 Nwn wItIM at currents ate 2 b 6 mph (12 to 129 kph). Of is prefer" b treat during early nionting and even" when shoe is less breeze and con. veC'ttn CWIOMS are minimal. Apply in the direction with breeze. b Ob- ion mssatrimh Awash length ano itsttel distribution. Duel spray head HOW TO APPLY AND HOW MUCH TO USE of equipment on a manner to ensure even dtetlwulan Of Ihe ULV Pat- FOR A BARRIER SPRAY USE A ''BACKPACK" ULV UNIT loose tMd'igf1011 the area to be treated. Avow mnslatton of spray mop. For use in rlOn Ihetrn,t UW Guide the deectlon 01 the equipment so that the tlischatge num 116 mAUI- portatla bscY.pack sguiprMnl use a t to (tuned at a distance of more can 6 lest (1.93 ml ItOm Ins ornsmental 9 me" oalto by soling 2.5 Ft Oz. of PUNT S7 OS to 223 Ft Or of sblwnt• making a total of 25 ounces. (see SOLVENT FOR DILUTION Plants and 15 eel (4 57m) at more from pasted olt(ee's. Paragraph) and APPiy with equipment adjusted 10 deliver UW parfoCleS NOTICE: IBUVW endow assumall risk andlattiktyause. SW899O 1d/W of SO b 100 microns mass meotan diameter. Use 25 It tit. Of ins diluted hanall" of Ones product not in aCCCtoante with the sculls of un label. sprayeacte as a 50 ft. (t5.2m) Swa'h while we" a a speed at 2 mph Rev. 08-3149 Apprvd 03415.90 (t.2 kph). 89 ~3. SC01,,I1uE® insecticide with SBP-1382@/PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE 4% + 12% MF FORMULA 11 A Ready To Use Synthetic Pyrelhroid For Effective Adult Mosquito (Including organophosphate resistant species). Midge (biting and non-biting), and Black Fly Control To be applied by Mosquito Abatement Districts, Public Health Officials end other trained personnel In Mosquito Control Programs. Contains 0.3 lb/gal (36 gel) of SOP-1382 and 0.9 Ibrgal 1109 DILI of Plperonyl Buloxide FOR AERIAL AND GROUND APPLICATION ACTIVE INGREDIENTS: PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS •tResmethrin [5-(phenylmelhyl)-3•turanyl]methy12,2-dlmethyl- HAZARD HUMANS A DOMESTIC ANIMALS 3-(2-methyl-/-propenyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate .............4.14%w/w CAUTION •'Plperonyl Buloxlde Technical 12.42% Harmful if swallo 'd .old a1 ' g vapor or spray mi/L Avoid contact wish ssM, eyes, of INERT INGREDIENTS*: : 83.44% clothing. Was or g site an Ina. A MEN F PRACTICAL TREATMENT 100.00%w/W Vows e . all 1 or Ise" IrolCenter.Dowool Induce womiling.This product -C1e1rens Isolates tale: worse. 30% 1:)etr end min. 70% (:llrens. e of i •noweel ell's S&P-13820 second el reernelMM Meee11c10e. Ir um ON As albs may be • Aaserd. aeweel ale Corp.. 400 {rte o •eenrre, Englowe" Calls. Insv kli NJ 0763= M ey Flush t p Iy of sit W medical attention a Irmallon persists. --EOuivele"I to 0.64% (►,rirlesrbbM) Is-preprMMeranrll ash" 1 n sA1" A A os i)r of wafer. Got medical eNewNon 11 itrilation penlsls. end 2.40% foisted compounds. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Icental" PoIrMea s obsessive. T e to I is Ic and birds. Do not apply so lakes. stresme, or ponds Do not apply PRECAUCION AL CONSUMIDOA:SI usled no too Inglee, no use etie produc a file wh at c no favor drift from woos bossed. Do noteontanllnotewelerbycleaning ell fiutla le hays side espllceds emppsmtnlt. oil on spot waslts. Jkdk ~ 110 THE USER: it yoleeannot rand English, do not use this product lent s I h e ufl TSICAI AND CHEMICAL NAtAA02 t7 explained 10 you.) f e, po pi for tar heel a open flame. Flesh pool minimum 1700f (76.76C). DIRECTIONS FOA USE KEEP OUT OF REACH ( III to Ion f del ow us product in a manner Inconsistent with it. Istming. CA UTIQ GE AND DISPOSAL Of nIS Rte a r, 1 or feed by storage or dlsposel SEE SIDE PANEL FOR ADDI L O G ro nt a one gallon and under. Store product M original container in a PRECAUTIONARY STATEME S I ed or a area STATEMENT N PRACTICAL TR ENT E icl AL: For containers over no gallon: Wastes resulting hom the use of this od me be disposed of on *Ile or at an approved waste disposal facility, H R DISPOSAL: For containers one ge8oo and under. Do not use amply container. onlalner and put In (rash. For containers aver one gallon Triple rinse (or efiulvafentl. EPA Est.: See Lot No. For Correlation on oiler for recycling or reconditioning, w puncture and dispose of In a sanllery landtiti, or EPA Reg. No. 432.716 A 42545-MO-1 P-12/14/90 by other procedures approved by Slots and Local oulbodOm F 10370-TX-1 P 656-GA-1 READ ENTIRE LABEL 184 DIRECTIONS For use by only professional or eertNled epplkslms or under the supervision of such applicators, for the reduction In snoloyanee hoosodull moequho Infestation{ and as a pert of e mos fiutto abatement program. IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA: For use only by local disiikls w ether public agencies which NET CONTENTS: have entered info and operate under a cooperative agreement wish Use Dejartme ll of Pubtie sal( L) H,1001, passions to Section 2426 of Me Health and Safety Cede. LOT NO. POj Ic EL 1310 WARRANTTSTATEMENT ~ l , Our recommendations for use of this produel are based open lasts believed to be ttgoble. The CORPORATION use of Ills product bring beyond the control of the manulaelurer, no guarantee, expressed of F' C, Fl... ~077 400 Si r.ar a.enue Implied. Is mode as to she effects of such at the results Io be obtained final used M accordance 1- gw^wG : C! N! Neo Jersey 07632 with directions of established sale Practice. The buyer must assume oil sesponslblitry, Including Injury or damage, resulting from lie misuse as such, or in combination wsih other mateelab. DIRECTIONS FOR USE iennrinued nn -vest ors-1 S Iff W W W W W W W W W = N = A A MEMO _ city of eagan DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION SUBJECT: PARK LAND DEDICATION SERVICE AREA 36E BACKGROUND The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council have previously determined a general location for a park within the northeast quadrant of the City in Park Service Area 36E. The intent of the City was to acquire a neighborhood park from five to seven acres in size south of the Weston Hills Addition and east of Highway 3. Previously, the Advisory Commission has reviewed the potential acquisition of a parcel of approximately six acres from Mr. Carroll, however, it was determined that property was unsuitable for parks purposes because of wetlands and existing vegetation. That parcel, along with the nineteen acres from Mr. Neary, were acquired by Shamrock Development. A preliminary plat for this property will be reviewed by the Commission at its March meeting. ISSUE The developer, Shamrock Corporation represented by Rick Packer, are asking that the Advisory Commission review the proposed parks dedication at this time to see if it is suitable. The Commission will not be making a parks dedication recommendation, but simply review and giving concept approval to the park area location in the proposed Pine Tree Addition (see Attachments). NEED FOR NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL City staff, including Director of Public Works Tom Colbert and Community Develop Peggy Reichert, recently met with District 196 staff concerning the location of a new elementary school. The School District is looking for a site for a new elementary school to relieve the overcrowding conditions at Pinewood Elementary and Shannon Glen Elementary located Page -2- in Rosemount. District staff has indicated that they are looking for a school site of approximately 15 acres in the general area of Gun Club Road given the attendance boundaries of these two schools. Because Rosemount does not have utilities to this area of their community, utility services would have to come through Eagan. Given these constraints, it is likely that the School District will continue to look for a site east of Highway 3 and north of the Rosemount/Eagan border. City staff have explained to the district staff the various issues that the City of Eagan has concerning this general search area and offered the opportunity to develop a school/neighborhood park site. Community Development Director Reichert suggested that the School District look at redeveloping the industrial area as a school location. This is the Haley's Addition which is out of place with the future residential neighborhood that is zoned. The School District is concerned with timing and cost as they are hoping to open the new elementary school in the Fall of 1995. Acquisition and potential relocation of businesses from the Haley's Addition may be more involved than acquisition of a farmstead or other property. The Advisory Commission needs to be aware of this opportunity for potential school/park given the other successes that the City and the School District have developed at the Eagan High School, Dakota Hills Middle School, Woodland Elementary and Oak Ridge Elementary Schools. PARK LOCATION Attached is a sketch which reflects one possible park dedication from the proposed Pine Tree Addition. This dedication could be added to a future acquisition from the property to the west. This five acre parcel is currently owned by Mr. Marotzke. The acquisition, by dedication or by purchase of the Marotzke parcel (5 acres) and a dedication of up to 2.5 acres from Pine Tree would provide a suitable park. The staff drawing currently shows a dedication of something less than the 2.5 acres and assumes acquisition of the entire five acre Marotzke parcel. The issue of a school/park really makes this issue more difficult for the Advisory Commission. If it is the City's intent to develop a school/park, it would behoove the City to wait until the school district has made a decision that they will indeed develop an elementary school at this location. That being the case, taking the dedication from Shamrock Development may be premature. It is possible that a dedication by outlot could be taken as a "tentative dedication" for a park. That dedication could then revert back to the developer to be platted into lots if the school district and City later determines that a school/park concept should be pursued. The outlot could then be returned to the developer--in exchange for a cash dedication--to be used for funding of the parks development. Another alternative is for the City to accept a land dedication from the developer with the school district to acquire additional property adjacent to the dedication for school development. In any case, the Advisory Commission should give thoughtful consideration to the alternatives involved and provide direction to the developer and staff as to how they feel this park project should proceed; either as a separate park or in combination with an elementary school. 0. Page -3- FOR COMMISSION ACTION Provide direction to the developer and City staff for a probable parks dedication for future development of The Pines. KV/lk L315EC36E.MMO 5% rn 46 ez Al J 711' -AID 'oel .01 1 111 Ilil 01 IN, C/) cwoool it c CD; it ~ ~ Z Cl) Q. . -t _ • ; O ' _T_ I MER 6G. 1 / / 1 t / / \ \ \ \ i / 1` \ \ m`,\\ rrT to / cn Z !I h / \ ~~m \ ? iii`" 41\ t5 . ~ ,w. m l c ~ ~ ~ may` i 1195pa..~ ~ \\~N~i/-. 711• lo, IZ !t \ / 1 (1// - I cm~ .r 1~.1 \ I\l,o\J\1\1\\ li 1io t I 1 ~ ssiiii+w~; Ki:~; ...............::x•••••sa::• ► L - / 1 \ \ ` 1 1 ; \ i~ °t0°~:iiwiiiiiis~.,,j•:'sB'.i. v l :e'ssf6i .::R's i9r.:ll , %i`~ l l 1 \ I . •.:>zes Ei' .i ~ \ ♦ . » U.:. Sr..... ~ a?:'sei? •i ~3s~~cic~~iis::~• t C~ \ „ ~ 1 \ 1 + ~ ~ \ ~J~ Eeii~~" : •:•...IS::~. 3~'set:ce's'scii• • / \ . ) 1 i rr..eac: '.;c;........•.• e:."~Mi:::~• ~•cr':~:E: t~ { 11 .::s+~e ii e••?: ~:ei:is;..:..;...~ ....:3::__:.. e6i crR.i 's:?E:illc.~s zi iiitisi i ncs _ l I _s . . . =MMM"i :e nifiinnunnumnunn iE.......:c....ici..... 00, A." Ql~ \ \ J ~i / 0 -V~, Ile - N / m I / l1 l 1 ( i } ) \ 0111 j 4p oo, ( le JI, !.E.+'t. GFROVE Ic1vn~J ~Q . t • ►4OTA 140fl~ e ILI' C:b 4 mum. 5X I • nw.' At 7 ~ TTT,,, r & or 1 . • ' • i Q Q Qom... Ilk, N- • ~%i . • 1 ii I job : i 4f ~b nay i 1 a ~+rv~ ae ~ r ~ n ~ err ~ldars r qw " / 1•4 u ' t IND. 11 IC + I~ ~ • , , ' N ' 14 N AL' S.1 "wiwl l/. .I I p. w+141r•,.R•r,~ , i rn '♦.H nnI 1~ ~I 1 Ito' EPOGE I I• 1 . •L• I ~ I .e, t,~ j 11 I ~ ~ ~ •`/•IAKflrl.l ~ IWllf Ir I jl III ! ` / ''~1 Irl • ~ J •1~V F +ww Inv. err •j 16 18 .13 t\J MN: 1 HAIL II IFt--'~, :=i 5 •.:l ~F 2?. 3 .l I I r •y I I ' tt.'_.:""~•y!..~i 2O• L. air„ I• 23 • ~ l~t~lli~Il ~ t~•• ~ I ~ ' ; : I '~'r «N• 1 ~ ~y / a I)i 'fie :t -1i y1~:_+~i0• n r .i Ijy'"4'! I u ,7•+Nw. v..,, n,. ;yx.•~- .f f•) •1. 1 ~1' ~i ~ 1 - ! 1 1~:'~•r-i 1"....+~ ' P i . • I ~ i tt41{lgtit ~ -411L~' ' 1 t ~ . , 196 "°'~r•4r"lllcs;':rn .°-i....y~«•'•:' a ) trail caning. I ' ' . ~F+r. ~ ! ..:1111 ~.«A .•~t 'r 1 4Y. 1-:~ . ••r• r. r. r. I E ':~,;.r ,r ~J~ ~f.' • I , liw,. ; '•F;4 +t; .I• `g'C ` ~~i., r~, ~1 IG HtS.`1 • . J r I I r II .-lop • ,.,r+ I. - 2V 5E m , 1 1."l;l•.N•NI , / 1 • • 1~.k. , I y ; I ii 1 1 , ^ yl I I ` II r' I'. rl 1 32 P ` I golf L'BatV,'ON HILLS I 4alt evil r; 4 p ' Rh ...11 ti x' EBANON DILLS 3. ! I' I 1 ' k:. 1 G.Hts __I~I~',''' ,LEBANQN HILLS ~ " ~ L j/ MI NN SOTA APPLE VALLEY Y • ~ r' ( LROSEUOMf , LI TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: AWARD OF GRANT TO FINANCE WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR SCHWANZ LAKE; SUMMARY OF PROJECT COMPONENTS AND SCHEDULE. DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1994 Background As Commission members will recall, the City completed a diagnostic/ feasibility study and implementation plan for Schwanz Lake in July, 1992. The purpose of that project was to identify the causes of poor water quality in Schwanz Lake and develop a specific course of action to reverse the degradation. The plan was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Commission at its October 1992 meeting, and subsequently approved by the City Council. Since the completion of the report, staff have pursued grant funding through a number of programs to assist the City in implementing the resulting strategy. In December, 1993, staff were notified that the City would be awarded a grant of nearly $94,000 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to finance up to 50% of the cost of implementing lake and watershed improvements for Schwanz Lake. Grant funds covering the first year's project elements are expected to be available this coming May. Project Work Plan and Timeline Attached is a summary work plan for the project that identifies specific tasks to be accomplished and the timeline for each. From May 1994 through April 1995 (project year 1), the following elements would be carried out under the work plan: 1. Initiation of more intensive public education activities. 2. Initiation of more intensive street sweeping in direct drainage of Schwanz Lake. 3. Deepening and construction of a dike in the south bay of the lake to reduce the pollutant load reaching the main body of the lake from a 12 acre direct drainage. 4. Extension of the inlet to Hay Lake, which discharges good quality water into the south bay of Schwanz Lake near its outlet, past the outlet into the main body of the lake to promote dilution. Staff would be happy to answer any questions from Commission members on these specific elements or on the project in general. Commission Action Requested Since the elements associated with this project have already been reviewed and approved in concept by the Commission, this agenda item is informative only. Staff intend to present specific structural elements (especially those affecting park operations) to the Commission for review during the design process for each element. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator SCHWANZ LAKE WATER QUALITY DIPROVEMENT PROJECT WORK PLAN SUMMARY (Prepared January, 1994) I. PROJECT TASKS The Phase II project is divided into seven tasks. These are: • Public Information/Education Program • Street Sweeping • South Basin Improvement • Extension of Hay Lake Inlet • Hypolimnetic Withdrawal • Park Beach Basin • Continued Monitoring Task 1: Public Information/Education Program Description: Public information and education will be an important element of this project. The major emphasis of this element is educating the public concerning different fertilizer management techniques, yard waste management techniques, and the fact that there is a direct connection between the storm sewer system and the lake. A follow-up questionnaire will be distributed to watershed residents at the end of the project to determine the effect of the education program on lawn care practices by residents. Timeline: Early spring through late summer of project years 1 through 3 (May 1994 - April 1997) Task 2: Street Cleaning Description: The City of Eagan owns and operates street sweepers, which are not currently operated in the Schwanz Lake watershed in an intensive fashion. This element prioritized the direct drainage area in Schwanz Lake for more intensive street sweeping activities. Timeline: March through October, 1994 - 1997. Task 3: South Basin Improvement Description: The southeastern corner of the lake forms a narrow bay. This project element converts the bay into a designated area for sedimentation. To segregate this bay, a submerged riprap berm will be constructed across the northern end of the bay. This element will be constructed in conjunction with the extension of the Hay Lake inlet. Once the Hay Lake inlet is extended, the South Basin will receive runoff only from a 12.5-ac residential watershed immediately east of the bay. Timeline: To be completed by April, 1995. Task 4: Extension of Hay Lake Inlet Description: The storm sewer inlet from Hay Lake currently discharges into the area where the South basin will be constructed. This element extends the Hay Lake outfall beyond the South Basin. There are two primary reasons for this extension. First, Hay Lake water quality is good relative to the other storm sewer inflows; by extending the Hay Lake outlet, lake water quality may be enhanced by dilution. The second reason is to maintain the efficiency of the South Basin by redirecting good quality flow around the basin. A future concern of this element arises because the PONDNET model predicts an increase in the hydraulic and phosphorus loadings from the Hay Lake outfall as that drainage becomes urbanized. The increased hydraulic loading is predicted to significantly decrease the hydraulic residence time of the lake and mitigate much of the increase in phosphorus loads. However, increased phosphorus loads associated with greater runoff volumes may still create problems. Therefore, the extension will be designed to have an optional discharge point within the South Basin should future conditions warrant discharges into the South Basin for "treatment" instead of directly into the main body of the lake. Timeline: To be completed by April, 1995. Task 5: Park Beach Basin Construction Description: This project element will be an optional element depending on the effectiveness of the LP32.1 Basin improvements. Depending on the performance of LP32.1, this additional project element may be necessary to reach of the in-lake phosphorus goal of 55 µg/1. Timeline: To be completed by April, 1996. Task 6: Hypolimnetic Withdrawal Description: One of the concerns for the Schwanz Lake is the potential for internal loading. During the monitored year, the lake remained stratified. Thus, while there was a significant amount of anaerobic phosphorus release from the sediments, the release did not appear to impact the surficial waters. Due to the shallow nature of the lake, however, permanent stratification does not occur every year. Hypolimnetic withdrawal is one means of reducing the pool of dissolved phosphorus caused by anaerobic sediment release. Since discharge from Schwanz Lake is controlled by a pump station, the technical feasibility of this option is good. Hypolimnetic withdrawal for the Schwanz Lake project is considered an optional/ alternative element. Utilization of this element will be based on additional monitoring and analysis of internal loading, and on the success of hypolimnetic withdrawal at Crystal Lake. Timeline: To be completed by April, 1997. Task 7: Post-Implementation Monitoring Description: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Schwanz Lake Improvement Project, a monitoring program will be conducted. Monitoring to determine the effectiveness of Pond LP-32.1 after improvement will be conducted toward the end of Year 1 (possibly extending into Year 2) of the project. Lake and runoff sampling focusing on Schwanz Lake will be conducted during the last summer of the project. The monitoring will be conducted for additional information regarding stratification and internal loading and to determine project benefits. Timeline: Conducted during spring and summer, 1995 and 1997. II. BUDGET A. Project Costs The budget for the Schwanz Lake Improvement Project was established based on the estimated project costs and project schedule. The project budget has been divided into the six program elements, which include the major project tasks. 1. Engineering 2. Construction 3. Public Education Program 4. Administrative/Legal 5. Post-Implementation Monitoring 6. Reports The budget for each of these elements is presented in Table 1. Additionally, Table 2 shows the budget for each project element. The engineering element includes costs for the preparation of formal plans and specifications for: 1. Extension of the Hay Lake inlet 2. Park Beach Basin The construction budget element is for costs directly associated with the construction and installation of materials and equipment for: 1. Street sweeping 2. South Basin 3. Extension of Hay Lake inlet 4. Park Beach Basin 5. Hypolimnetic Withdrawal TABLE 1 SCHWANZ LAKE BUDGET Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Engineering $ 3,820 $ 3,160 -0- $ 6,980 Construction 44,200 59,500 5,220 108,920 Public Information /Education 15,330 5,360 5,630 26,320 Administration/ Legal 6,230 6,600 2,780 15,610 Monitoring 1,238 -0- 3,740 4,978 Reports 2,460 2,580 20,100 25,140 TOTALS $73,278 $77,200 $37,470 $187,948 GRANT AMOUNT @ 50% Is 93,974 TABLE 2 SCHWANZ LAKE BUDGET BY PROJECT ELEMENT' Public Education $ 26,320 Street Sweeping 14,266 South Basin (Construction only) 12,562 Hay Lake Inlet Extension (Construction and Engineering) 31,042 Park Beach Basin (Construction and Engineering) 26,368 Hypolimnetic Withdrawal (Construction only) 31,662 Monitoring 4,978 General and Construction Administration 15,610 Reports 25.140 TOTAL $187,948 'Adjusted for the project duration using a five percent annual inflation factor. B. Matching Funds Matching funding provided for this project will be as follows: Source Activity Amount City of Eagan Cash contribution for $37,523 preparation of construction documents and construction, etc. City of Eagan In-kind services for monitoring, $53,796 project management and coordination and public education Gun Club WMO Cash contribution for capital $ 2,000 improvements. University of MN In-kind contribution for two yard $ 655 Extension Service care seminars lftsdbwa=038 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT RE: ALTERNATIVES FOR THE CONTROL OF FILAMENTOUS ALGAE IN CARLSON LAKE DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1994 Introduction Carlson Lake (City pond LP-42) is an 11-acre lake located in south central Eagan just south of Diffley Road and east of Pilot Knob Road (Figure 1). The lake has a maximum depth of 22 feet and an average depth of 11.6 feet, making it one of the deeper lakes in Eagan. Carlson Lake has been classified in the Eagan water quality management plan as a class II indirect contact recreation water body, which means water quality is intended to be good enough to support fishing, canoeing and other non-contact recreation activities. Water quality monitoring in 1992 indicated that the lake had average total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and Secchi disk values of 62 ug/liter, 14.5 ug/liter and 7.5 feet during the summer season, all of which meet or somewhat exceed the water quality goals set for Class II water bodies. However, the lake has long been affected by floating mats of filamentous algae that rise to the surface during the early summer and make recreational use of the lake, especially along the shoreline, difficult during much of the summer. In addition, there is considerable evidence that internal loading of phosphorus due to phosphorus release from enriched bottom sediments is occurring and may be contributing to planktonic algae blooms later in the summer. Numerous other lakes and ponds in Eagan are also affected by filamentous algae growth. The growths are notoriously difficult to control. While chemical and mechanical controls are both possibilities to deal with the symptoms of the problem, staff have pursued investigations designed to determine strategies to control the problem at it's source. Investigations Last summer, water resources program staff contracted with Blue Water Science of St. Paul to work with staff to determine the mechanism underlying the proliferation of filamentous algae in the Carlson Lake system and to develop a cost-effective strategy to control it. On August 5, 1993, staff and the consultant visited the lake for sampling purposes. Based on visual observation, information from the literature, and laboratory work to characterize sediment, water and algal samples collected during the field investigation, it appears that the dominant forms of both the U' filamentous and planktonic algae species that most affect water clarity in the lake start as a mat near the sediment/water interface at depths in the lake between 4 and 8 feet. It appears as if these species lie relatively dormant along this interface until water temperatures, light, and other environmental conditions are suitable. Once conditions are acceptable, the algal colonies, fed by high level of phosphorus at the sediment/water interface, proliferate and float either to the surface (filamentous forms) or off the bottom and higher into the water column (planktonic forms) where they remain dominant for most of the recreational season. Control options Several options for control of the filamentous algae were investigated. A brief summary of those evaluations follow. 1. Herbicides. While herbicides such as copper sulfate can be used to control filamentous algae, the concentrations required to do so are high, resulting in potential toxicity problems for other organisms in the aquatic system. In addition, herbicide use is strictly a short term control strategy, meaning it would need to be repeated at least yearly and possibly several times per year to be effective. Finally, decomposition of plant material killed by the herbicide application will result in an oxygen demand on the system as well as a shock load of nutrients to the system, possibly stimulating the growth of other equally undesirable aquatic plant growths. 2. Mechanical harvesting. Staff from the water resources program and the Utility Division of the Public Works Department have developed a method of mechanically skimming floating vegetation from the surface of ponds and small lakes where access is available. The method is rather labor intensive, requiring about 16 man-hours of effort per acre of water cleared. In addition, it does not deal with the factors which create the nuisance and is relatively short-term, requiring 1-2 treatments per year for each pond. Finally, it is not suitable for planktonic algae control. One advantage is that it does result in the removal of harvested plant material from the system. 3. Aeration. Aeration is a technique that sometimes appears to control nuisance algae growth, although control of filamentous algae using this technique is not well documented. The goal of aeration is to maintain the sediment/water interface in an oxygenated condition so that chemical conditions are such that phosphorus continues to be tightly bound to iron and other compounds. As long as the oxygenated conditions persist, phosphorus will be held in a form that is not available to stimulate the growth of nuisance algal forms. The initial capital costs and on-going operation/maintenance costs of the aeration system are high. For example, capital costs of the neccessary aeration equipment would be at least $6,000, and electrical costs are estimated at $2,600-$3,600 for a 6 month (April-September) operating season. In addition, the oxygenated conditions that control phosphorus availability in a naturally enriched environment like Carlson Lake may persist only as long as the aeration unit itself is in operation. While aeration is a potential treatment method that should be considered by the City, its high initial and operation/maintenance costs as well as the potential committment to this method for the long term suggest that caution should be used before investing in this method of control. 4. Alum treatment. Alum is a compound that chemically ties up phosphorus regardless of the oxygen content of the surrounding environment. It has been used often to reduce the internal recycling of phosphorus to control planktonic algal populations, but the use of alum to control filamentous algae would be a relatively new application for which data on effectiveness is not available. Staff's working hypothesis is that if the alum is applied at the right time (in this case, immediately after ice-out in early April), it could deny the benthic mats of both planktonic and filamentous algae of the high levels of phosphorus they need to become dominant. In addition, it appears that one treatment could be adequate to significantly decrease phosphorus availability for several years. The cost of alum control is approximately $300/acre (total cost for Carlson Lake of about $3,300) and would require review by, and a permit from, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The City's consultant, who has had considerable experience with all of the above methods of control, feels that an alum treatment may have the greatest potential for controlling nuisance algae blooms in a cost-effective manner. Request for Commission Action Staff is interested in discussing these control options with the Commission and would appreciate any guidance the Commission could provide on this issue. Any treatment option selected would involve collaboration with, at a minimum, the lakeshore owners surrounding Carlson Lake and would not decrease the intensity of activities in the watershed designed to reduce external loadings of phosphorus. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator ~3. HALL F1clLire 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~('t I CL. IV I ) `~7 K I Lc JP-10 30 J t CL. VI VII C i E I \5 J-t JP- 20. JE CL. V uNl - 11 a -49 t I ( I VII 419 36" 429 CL. II 42" 36" L. VII Jp HOSFOR JOHN ~I~ 1.R►(tl 4I; FIRST -~I I - `PRR4( V I RK ~I 12 5Q E'er N M1GH L J P _ 53 JP- TRICK 'Rc r M - ~ ADD N CL. V V CLA EAGAN c XI HILLS PiM r. PARK f l Q H1 _ AWN. HV~ i NY10 H I T Diffley lced i 3 *a A G , KINCINtIlt' l PLAZA 69 'FOR 1 ASTER Mal P-5 1 EA~ W: I L. VII Q LP-43 1 KENSING , -a r ~CL. II P , Isf A ILEXiN`N2 POIN LEXINGTON 1 C3r1SOri Lake POIN=I PT. I LP-61.1 p ~a wCLI C L. V C L . HILL P / PA V I lJ>V r MTS. 2 P fit LP-37 i CL. II • sl a. z ` e c • 46 C I F 6 34 0, I L . V11 LP-38 P-68 CL. 1 • - CL. IV i PARKVIEw O 4° GOLF AKOTA COURSE . I LP-20 COUNTY LP-21. LP-24: N 8P CL.1 PARK CL. IV; CL.I 2 DA L fD%EOR H. N PARK CL • NAPEL MI `~r EXCEPTOM CL-.54 8APT15T CM R 'gip - 3 NOT INCLUDED I LP-19 I N Lpom% CL. cL::4. I CP I p- N a ~z L It 4 CL: il~ LP-66 N ' LP-) CL. IV; .I DAK A„ 0 Y PARK CL. . P-17 'I JANUARY 1994 DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS 1. Eagan Seniors enthusiastically welcomed the Valley Troubadours, the Burnsville Senior Center "kitchen band", at a performance at Oak Woods on January 22. About 50 seniors "sang along", applauded and were rewarded with an encore number, then visited over coffee. 2. Parks and Recreation is co-sponsoring the Teddy Bear Band appearance on February 6 with the Eagan Area Community Education 196 Advisory Council. Seven council volunteers will assist staff at the event. McDonalds of Eagan is providing orange drink. The Department will serve popcorn. Donations to the food shelf will be accepted. 3. Tennis Director, Patty Mraz, has resigned here position to spend more time with her family and to further pursue her work will college age tennis players. She will, however, direct the Junior Tennis Satellite tournament already scheduled in Eagan as her experience and expertise are needed for those events. Patty has provided the primary impetus for the growth in Eagan's tennis program over the past five years. This is a significant loss to the City and to the program. 4. A portion of Department staff attended the February 10-11, 1994 MRPA State Conference. Several staff selected the option of attending the national conference in Minneapolis in October. 5. On February 3, South of the River Recreation staff met with Department Directors. These periodic joint meetings serve to reaffirm the cooperative program efforts, to provide opportunity to discuss new challenges and to generate new understandings where appropriate. 6. Staff attended a Governor's council on Physical Fitness and Sports Workshop. The "Creating Unique Lifestyle Fitness Partnerships" workshop was geared toward fitness opportunities for the over 50% of Minnesotans who lead a sedentary lifestyle. 7. Staff will meet with School District 196 personnel this week to review Spring/Summer facility maintenance/repair projects, anticipated usage demands and other potential cooperative efforts. 8. Routine ice rink maintenance has been the order of the day for the Park Maintenance Division, as cleaning and flooding of the 32 rinks occupy most of the maintenance staffs time. 9. On Saturday, January 29, Park Maintenance Worker Don Buecksler assisted with the annual Mite Hockey Jamboree at Rahn Park. 10. Park Operations Supervisor Richard Pelletier began his term this past month as President of the Minnesota Parks Supervisor Association. 11. Park Maintenance staff have been assisting the Street Maintenance Division with street plowing in a cooperative effort among all departments to improve customer service. 12. While the cold snaps have been longer than usual, we still have been thinking spring, and have began taking delivery of our annual fertilizer orders. Storage space has had to be cleared for approximately 80 pallets of fertilizer needed for 1994. 13. As a result of an article in the Eagan Sun Current, concerning use of volunteers by the Parks and Recreation Department, a number of individuals and organizations have stepped forward to offer their assistance in beautifying City parks. Most of these projects will involve the landscaping of parks with flowers and shrubbery beginning this spring. 14. The Forestry Division has applied for and has been granted an America's Treeways Program grant. The grant program is coordinated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in association with National Tree Trust Bank Partners (major U.S. wood industries) and the American public in an effort to promote tree planting on lands adjacent to our nation's highways. The grant requires that tree planting labor be provided by volunteer organizations. The City of Eagan Parks Department will be working with adult Sentence-to Service crews and youth Twin City Tree Trust crews to plant 900 seedlings (spruce, bur oak and birch) on the cast boundary of Blackhawk Park adjacent to Interstate 35 E. ~S . January 1994 Happenings Page -2- 15. The Parks Department/Forestry Division is currently working with Twin City Tree Trust youth crews to construct 30 wood duck houses and 30 blue bird houses. Completed houses will be installed this March and April in various City parks to provide wildlife habitat. 16. Preparation are already underway for our 1994 Arbor Day festivities. This year's Arbor Day tree planting celebration will take place on April 30th at South Oaks Park. An innovative plan to recreate a complete native oak woodland resource is being considered. A public tree sale of 1,000 bare root trees will take place on May 6 and 7 at the Central Maintenance Facility. 17. Field inventory of new park trees planted during 1993 is nearing completion. Approximately 600 trees were planted into various City parks. Following field tagging of these new trees, information will be entered in to the TRIMS computer inventory program. 18. Following six months of Tree Preservation Guideline enforcement, minor revisions are being considered in attempts to provide for easier understanding of this policy by developers and builders, as well as more efficient follow-up by City staff. • February 14, 1994 Commission Meeting « February 15, 1994 Council Meeting Cm-nmion1XVPEN-1AN 2 Metropolitan Council Council calls for increased parks funding Funds to acquire land and develop the to 1987 to about $3 million since 1988 (Ramsey County); a new picnic pavilion at Twin Cities area's regional parks have (see chart). Como Park repairs to Coon Rapids Dam; been drying up in recent years. Yet demand continues to rise. Visits replacing a beach house at Bush lake; replacing To respond to growing needs, the have tripled in the last 13 years, according wom*ut facilities in Minnehaha Park and Lake Metropolitan Council proposes to to estimates (see chart). The parks had Harriet; and buying land from owners within reinvigorate the area's park system by 16.4 million visitors in 1992, twice the several parks. Investing about $29 million during the visits to Minnesota state parks that year in February the Council wig present the 1994-95 biennium. The funds are drawn (see chart). This rapid increase reflects the legislature with a biennium request of $14.8 from two sources: state appropriations and importance of parks in an urban setting, million in state bond authority to continue regional bonds. and the overall quality of life. acquisition and development. (The request State funds, the primary source of New funds are proposed for develop. recognizes that park users also come capital funding, have fallen sharply since ing two new facilities-lake Minnetonka from outside the metro area.) The Council will 1988. State bonds and grants fell from an Regional Park (Hennepin County) and supplement that by issuing a total of average of $10 million annually from 1977 Burlington Northern Regional Trail $13.4 million in regional bonds for 1994.95. To address wear and tear on older parks,, 55 percent of the funds will go for redevelopment. Annual visits (in millions) ® Estimated About 29 percent will go to develop acquired 18 sites and 16 percent is for new acquisitions. The Council can issue the bonds because it • i will reduce its park bonding debt from $40 16 Regional park use is up million (the maximum allowed by state law) to $15 million by paying off $25 million in March. 14 To make full use of its parks bonding j / capacity, the Council plans to issue about $6.7 12 million In regional bonds each year. These / ' • short-tern, five-year bonds will provide a steady source of funding for future improvements. i i 10 ! ! The Council estimates that an Investment of about $29 million in regional parks in 1994.95 would produce an economic impact of $56 j / million and would create 734 jobs. Y 6 ' The Council will hold a public hearing 1980 81 82 83 84 8S 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Feb.10 on improvements proposed for regional parks. (See 'Future parks projects," page 3). Jim Martin Twin Citians drive more than half way to the sun each day. If we put all our car trips end to end, our combined daily commute is a whopping 55 n 1970.- 23 million miles a day Each car below accounts for part of the 32 million-mile growth, as foilc Longer trips due to urban growth. More trips per traveler. More travekm Adds 10 million miles. Adds 9 million miles. Adds 8 million miles. Fach For every 100 new jobs,, d)we are 88 nwne can going b work 0 Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions 3 Capital funding is down Future parks projec}Lz Projects proposed for regional pat... Millions of Dollars and trails from 1994 through 2000 will be 40 the subject of a public hearing Feb. 10, State Funding EERequested held by the Metropolitan Council's Committee of the Whole. The hearing on 30 the parks capital improvement program (CIP) will be held at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 20 To obtain a copy of the CIP, call Council's Data Center at 291-8140, or 291-0904 (TDD). To speak, please register by calling 291-6312. Send written 10 comments to Ame Stefferud, Metropolitan Council, 230 E Fifth St, St. Paul, MN S5101. Hearing record doses Feb. 25, 4:30 p.m. For more information, 197576 7778 79$0 8182 8384 8586 87-88 89 90 91 92 93 94+95 call Ame at 291-6360. Millions of Dollars 40 Regional park visitors Regional Funding Planned double state park users 30 Estimated 1992 vbits (misiom) ZO 20 15 10 10 5 1975 77 91 94-95 State parks Regional parks FYI-new publications, The following publications have been published recently by the Metropolitan Council. To order, write the Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E Rfth St, St. Paul, MN 55101. These publications are also availabk at major public libraries in the metropolitan area. Note: Customers must now add ion miles a day. sates tax to the price of documents St. Paul residents and organizations add 7%; all others, 6.5% 1Quarterly Economic Indkd^ Plan Content Guidelines. No. 59494-007; 55 million miles Third Quarter 1993• no charge. No 62093-099; $1-% Metropolitan Council 1992 Program Evalwtion Residential Building Permits issued In the Twin Report No. 100-93-092; no charge. Cures Metropolitan Area During January. m - September 1993. No. 62043103; $1.50. Metropolitan Council Landfill Abatement Metropolitan Council membm and their dbtrIr Account: Fiscal Year 1993 ExperWftu d and Activities Report No. 522-93-054; no charge. Mary Mottle H. Riet Sm9 dt, 3: ulus r3, Jo G Roger SmidU onift 4: r, Sandra Siraiber, 2: morrr~ Choosing to drive alone Metropolitan Council 1994 Local Planning S. Mardis M Head, 6. Barbara Butt; WiBarm, 7; i Adds S million miles. Assistance Loan Guidelines. No. 800-93101; A. Kunrner. 8: David Hartley, % Patrick C. tarrtg. _ no charge, fsdnr Newcome,11. E Craig Monk 12; Diane 2. Soures~ Corur[il (DeDe) Wolfsom 13; Stephen & Weiylo4 Jr. 14; Metropolitan Area Community Water Supply Kevin Howe, 15; Terry tlower,16. TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: POSSIBLE BYPASS OF FISH LAKE OUTFLOWS AROUND POND JP-5 TO IMPROVE BLACKHAWK LAKE WATER QUALITY. DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1994 summary of issue The major issue before the Commission is whether to recommend construction by the City of a bypass around Pond JP-5 to carry good quality Fish Lake outflows directly to Blackhawk Lake. The preliminary cost of the bypass is estimated at $22,000 and the estimated benefits are a reduction in loading of total phosphorus to Blackhawk Lake of 13%. Further benefits are substantial if the pond is deepened significantly in addition to the bypass. Based on staff's experience with past projects, these projects have a very high degree of cost-effectiveness. The bypass would have to be constructed within the Kingswood 3rd Addition which was approved for preliminary plat by the City Council on September 7, 1993. The bypass is not currently a condition of the preliminary plat, though some limited pond excavation is required. Background Pond JP-5 is a shallow wetland with a mean depth of approximately two feet and a surface area of three acres. It is classified as a nutrient basin in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. The pond is located between Fish and Blackhawk Lakes in the storm sewer system (Exhibit 1). It currently receives storm sewer discharges and overland runoff from about 177 acres of surrounding land, including approximately 97 acres of Mn DOT right-of-way associated with Interstate 35E. In addition, the pond receives all of the outflow from Fish Lake through a storm sewer that enters the north end of the pond within the Kingswood 3rd Addition. Inflows from Fish Lake average 75-85 ug/liter total phosphorus, while the total phosphorus content of the other inflows is estimated at 300-650 ug/liter. Under current conditions, the relatively clean discharge from Fish Lake mixes with the other runoff entering Pond JP-5 before it all discharges through a pipe under Interstate 35E to Blackhawk Lake, one of six Class I water bodies in the City. The Kingswood 3rd Addition was reviewed for appropriate water quality mitigation measures in July, 1993. As a result of that analysis, two water quality-related conditions were attached to the preliminary plat. One required the developer to increase by 1.2 acre-feet through excavation the wet pond volume of Pond JP-5. The other requires the developer to install a skimmer on the outlet of the pond. Both conditions were intended to simply prevent any further degradation in the water quality of Blackhawk Lake associated with the development of Kingswood 3rd Addition, as per city policy established in the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan. In November 1993, during subsequent discussions regarding possible water quality-related capital improvements in the City, the potential benefit of bypassing relatively good quality outflows around Pond JP-5 to an inlet pipe to Blackhawk Lake was mentioned. Based on a preliminary investigation of the benefits and physical feasibility, staff approached the developer to request permission to enter the Kingswood 3rd Addition property to gather site- specific information needed to further analyze the bypass option (Exhibit 2). After an initial refusal by the landowner to cooperate, a subsequent letter was received from the owner's attorney providing the requested permission (Exhibit 3). During January, staff and the city engineering consultant developed a variety of rough layouts and benefit analyses. The results of those investigations are outlined below. Summary of Technical Options Following are a description of four options, along with estimated benefits to Blackhawk Lake, estimated costs to the City, and a summary of other considerations. A summary of the cost- effectiveness of each of the four options discussed below is presented in Exhibit 4. Option 1: Do not construct the bypass and continue to require the Kingswood 3rd Addition developer to increase through excavation the volume of Pond JP-5 by 1.2 acre-feet. Benefits to Blackhawk Lake: Modeling indicates that these actions would prevent any further increase in the mean annual total phosphorus concentration in the lake with the development of the Kingswood 3rd Addition. No improvement in current water quality conditions for Blackhawk Lake would occur, however. Cost to City: There would be no cost to the City. The developer's cost to excavate the pond is estimated at $7,300 to $13,500 for the pond excavation. Other considerations: The City could lose perhaps the most cost-effective opportunity available to further improve the water quality of Blackhawk Lake. Construction 2 of the bypass would be very difficult once the area around the pond is developed for single family residential uses. Option 2: Construct the bypass only, with no excavation of the pond. Benefits to Blackhawk Lake: Modeling indicates that a bypass of all Fish Lake outflows around Pond JP-5 to Blackhawk Lake could reduce phosphorus loadings to the lake by 13% and could decrease mean annual total phosphorus concentrations in the lake by almost 11%. Costs to City: A very rough estimate of the cost of the bypass is $22,000 if the work is done this winter. Depending on the outcome of negotiations with the developer, the City portion of the cost could be the full amount or a portion thereof. This amount does not include replacement costs for loss of significant trees associated with construction of the bypass, as described below. Other considerations: If the route of the bypass is adjacent to the west shore of the pond (Exhibit 5), a loss of mature oaks along the pond edge would occur. It is estimated that an area extending up to 25 feet back from the edge of the pond would be affected by installation of the bypass. A tree inventory for the site indicates that 13 bur and white oaks with diameters between 16 and 22.5 inches lie within this area. Under a worst case scenario, a significant percentage of these trees could be lost as a result of the construction activity. If the bypass pipe was constructed though the pond, tree loss could be eliminated. However, the Superintendent of Utilities has expressed strong reservations about potential maintenance problems associated with a storm sewer pipe buried in the pond bottom. His concerns are based on the limitations of equipment for clearing blockages in storm pipes and the difficulty of access to the site. Finally, the developer has expressed strong reservations about the diversion of the relatively clean Fish Lake discharges that serve a dilution function for the pond, and in particular about the further degradation of water quality in Pond JP-5 that would occur as a result of the bypass. Modeling indicates the mean phosphorus concentration in Pond JP-5 would rise by 130% over the pre-bypass condition (Exhibit 4). 3 Option 3: Construct the bypass and require the developer to mitigate the impacts of the Kingswood 3rd Addition by excavating Pond JP-5. Benefits to Blackhawk Lake: Under this scenario, modeling indicates that a bypass of all Fish Lake outflows around Pond JP-5 and directly to Blackhawk Lake would result in the same magnitude reduction in phosphorus loading to Blackhawk Lake as under Option 2 (i.e. a 13% reduction in loading and an ilk reduction in in-lake concentration of phosphorus). The pond excavation obligation associated with Kingswood 3rd Addition could be reduced to .9 acre- feet and still meet the standard mitigation requirements applied by the City to new developments. Cost to City: Assuming the bypass is constructed at City expense, costs would be the same as for the above option. Other considerations: Considerations for this option are the same as for Option 2. Another consideration, however, is that the developer's cost to comply with the City's water quality mitigation policy would be reduced by about 25% to between $5,500 and $10,200 because of a reduction in the developer's excavation obligation from 1.2 acre-feet to .9 acre-feet. Option 4:Construct the bypass and increase the total amount of excavated material removed from Pond JP-5 to 2.9 acre- feet. Benefits to Blackhawk Lake: This option provides the largest benefit to Blackhawk Lake. Modeling indicates that phosphorus loadings to Blackhawk Lake would decrease by 28% and average annual total phosphorus concentrations in the lake would be reduced by almost 17%. Cost to City: The total cost to the city of constructing the bypass and financing the additional excavation above that required of the developer is estimated at $39,000. Other Considerations: All considerations identified under Options 2 and 3 apply for this option. In addition, the additional excavation would improve somewhat the quality of the water standing in Pond JP-5 after the diversion, though not to the level of the pre- bypass condition. Exhibit 4 shows the mean phosphorus condition in Pond JP-5 would be about 65% higher than under the pre-bypass condition. 4 qT Commission Action Requested • Staff is seeking guidance from the Commission regarding whether and under what conditions the City should be willing to pursue the bypass described above. It may be appropriate for the Commission to adopt a motion recommending to the City Council how to proceed on this issue. y Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator 5 s ~ - OAKS P--9f L.VI > 4 i I 1 i ~ m Exhibit 111 ~ ~ , RI( - 2 T oaT 0 v1 4. P=5 -r FnX PARK N DP-6. p' UNISYS CL IV RIDE P_ CL.. g , . P-4 V lot V 14" 'p sUR 3 b SAW" 4 DP- T RE H c N TOWN t ; 100 CID-A2 w1 CENTRE CL. VII : V 2M 1 Ypi r =p• C' TIM CI T. , VI CD T TH 70 RST 2701 T.C. J p-6 ix ~M ~ R1L.S1l Itij L. C L.S.-1 t Inlet from Fish Lake 12*! t JP-1 i 1.2 Pond JP-5 Outlet to CL. V - - Blackhawk Lake J p _ JP, BLACKHV*. CITY V • z 27 HALL PARK J~,~ . ARrc : , a s 8 - JP-10 C CL. VI P-294 r49 '11 b i~'~ ' % ~ ~ ~ ~ VII. a~~ • -f 1 _ . , .k.. q ter, ~ 'x * ~ . ~ e • '~~,s CL. a n JONN FIRST, `Y 8p-3 arm. 1 , CL; Y .SJ TRIC1 ~CL. EAGAN A i~a ~/4 L~ ~Y 8P 25 P;';~ pr t g PARK~nr u y : ~ t CLt CI,.,VII • .8 :3• sew^. r `•y - k -~T~' i If Do . 1 ATFy LP 43:x: r r CL. 2 U- Exhibit 2 city of eogon THOMAS EGAN Mayor December 13, 1993 PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN MR. JAMES HOERNE THEODORE WACHTER 1401 KINGS WOOD ROAD Council Members EAGAN, MN 55122 THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Dear Mr. Hoerne: E. J. VAN OVERBFKF I'm writing you regarding a possible option that could dac=`ease your costs in meeting water quality mitigation requirements for the Kingswood 3rd Addition. Since City staff last reviewed your project as part of the preliminary plat process, another option has arisen to deal with water quality concerns. That option involves interception of outflow from Fish Lake and diversion of the outflow directly to the outlet of Pond JP-5. This option would result in better treatment of runoff directed to Pond JP-5, including the runoff that will be generated by the Kingswood 3rd Addition. Consequently, the amount of additional pond excavation now required as part of the conditions of plat approval for Kingswood 3rd Addition could be ` reduced. In order to better evaluate this option, I'm requesting permission to enter the Kingswood 3rd Addition land and evaluate the possible pipe alignments so that we can estimate costs and benefits. Once the feasibility of the option is established, we will be able to discuss it with you in greater detail. At this time, it does not appear that pursing this option would slow your efforts to develop the site. If you could send me a written response to this request for access and this preliminary proposal by December 23, 1993, I would appreciate it. If I don't hear from you by then, I'll try to contact you by phone shortly after Christmas. Thank you 'for your consideration. Please contact me at 681-4300 if you have any questions or would like to meet to discuss the issue. 7 Sine rely, /7:, Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator cc. Ken Vraa ,.r ME MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT N ROAD THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122.1897 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681.4600 PHONE: (612) 681.4300 FAX: (612) 681-4612 Equal Opportunity/Afflrmative Action Employer FAX: (612) 681-4360 TDD: (612) 454-8535 TDD: (612) 454.8535 Exhibit 3 4TTORNEI SAT LAW ARTHUR GILLEN KUNTZ .MILLER LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, P.A. ROGERC TI110TH1'J. hUNTZ . DANIEL J. BEESON ROLLIN H. CRAWFORD 633 SOUTH CONCORD STREET SUITE 402 P.O. BOX 298 KELLY J. NEILAN KRUELL SOUTH ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55073 KENNETH J. ROHLF 612-451-1831 FAX 612-450-7384 ELIZABETH J. WOLF JOSEPH P. LALLY HAROLD WANDER December 20, 1993 1910.1992 Mr. Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 RE: Kingswood 3rd Addition/Pond JP-5 Dear Mr. Brasch: This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of last week wherein we discussed the possibility of continuing to investigate options with regard to the storm water runoff matters in Kingswood 3rd Addition. As I indicated to you I would send you this letter authorizing you to enter onto the property and do whatever investigation is necessary for you to further develop your alternative approaches and the costs thereof. As I also expressed to you, Horne Development Corporation is concerned that whatever is done may cause a deterioration in the quality, amount and level of water in JP-5. On the other hand, Home Development Corporation is prepared as always to review options which may be to the long term benefit of the City and the development which surrounds this pond. After you have had a chance to prepare further information regarding this matter, please give me a call in order that we might engage in further discussions. I would anticipate that both Mr. Home and his engineer, Bob Wiegert, would be involved in those discussions as well. Very ly y h-16 Rollin H. Crawford RHC:ln c.c. Jim Home Bob Wiegert 1(p Exhibit 4 Relative Comparison of Options-Pond JP-5 Bypass Option # Description Reduction in Estimate of Cost per P Concentration P Loading City's Cost Pound P s in Pond JP-5 to Blackhawk Lake Reduction Reduction) 1 No bypass, None from None N/A 150 ppb 1.2 ac.-ft. baseline condition excavation 2 Bypass only 162 lbs. P/yr. $22,000 $7 345 ppb (13%) 3 Bypass and 162 lbs. P/yr. $22,000 $7 320 ppb .9 ac. -ft. (13%) excavation 4 Bypass and 342 lbs. P/yr. $39,000 $6 250 ppb 2.9 ac. -ft. (28%) total excavation Cost per Pound Reduction in P Load for Selected Past Capital Projects (for Comparison)'' Pond LP-32.1 Modifications $90-$100flb. Pond BP-4 Modifcations $17-$20/ib. i Unit costs based on cumulative phosphorus loading reduction over 20 year period. i 014 .:-79 t ~I¢~7~ - - - - - , b Exhibit 5 ; % ~ c c_vcio K `NO 24 4 \ ~ I I ~ • o \ X11 231 I \ . I , l 1 d. 7n i f; Inlet frown Fish Lake v I li\ 1 1 11 28 \ \ 1 22, 11\~ \ \ Possible Bypass Rr~ut~ i \ \ \ y' \ \ i t 1. \ 21 \ e CC: N Jill \1 111 1 ° rl l i 11 j jl~i'lll \ \ 1 \ \ 1 420 I 1 1 1 III I I L' I I I 11 / / I'~9fic Are \1►~" 11f l9 1' l 111~31~ ~ _ k i i• t III II r1/~~ , : ~ ° ,1,111,E ~Py Id IiLI L` , ti.. M , x,13 N N,~ Z3.r, ''I II11 1 I 1 f. 1+ LI . { ~ ~ I ~ (1 ~ HWI~ l,34n I sl II.1,`I 11 1~ (11 tll°, ~ t e., ; I , ` 1 old JP-5 Outlet 1\111 1 1 II I f - - 1 '1111 0 0 v~ 11 I i I( c.~~.a► ~e .s '111`. 1 I I'1\~~11 (I' ~~i r I I, t 33; ~Ex. 1 I I► j 1. I';1 1 p • ° / I''' / III ~ - ~ K ,'r IIII( r/34;~ 1 II\ s~ 1 J 12 city of eagan MEMO DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1994 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION SUBJECT: COMMUNITY FESTIVAL SURVEY - PRELIMINARY AND PARTIAL RESULTS BACKGROUND The Commission may recall that in the Fall of 1993 discussions concerning community festivals were held. The focus of the Commission's discussion centered on the advisability of creating a Community Festival in Eagan. Recognition was given to the current July 4 Celebration, organized by the Lions Club. The City Council, Commission and staff wished to learn whether residents are supportive of the concept of a new Community Festival. A survey questionnaire was developed through input from the Commission and staff. A copy is attached to this memorandum. A random sample was selected. The survey was mailed to that group on December 30, 1993. Responses were requested to be returned by January 14, 1994. Survey questionnaires were also placed in the shelter buildings the weekend of January 7 & 8, 1994. Winter Recreation Leaders were instructed to approach adults to respond to the survey and to spread the effort throughout the day. At this time, data from the random sample is available for review. Data entry is not yet completed on the shelter building sample. This brief report preliminarily reviews the random sample only. RANDOM SAMPLE The 1993 Eagan telephone directory was used to select the sample. The survey questionnaire was sent to 251 households. Eighty six (86) questionnaires were returned. Page -2- This represents 34% of the sample. Of those, 77 questionnaires were actually completed. The post office returned 32 surveys, 13% of the sample, noting the person had moved leaving no forwarding address. No response was received from 53% of the sample. RANDOM SAMPLE SURVEY RESULTS The data is presented in two forms. First, the highlights of the results of the random sample as a whole are discussed. Second, the responses from representative sub- groups within the sample are reviewed. The typical kinds of community festivals respondents have attended are: July 4, 90%; Arts & Crafts Shows, 64%; and winter carnivals, 45%. Among the other choices, only Heritage Days achieved noticeable mention and that by only 23% of the respondents. Community festival activities that are of interest include: fireworks, 79%; parades, food booths and arts & crafts shows, 64%; and entertainment, 61% rated highest. Carnivals interest, 39% of the respondents; athletic contests, 27%; and fun runs, 19%. A festival is most appealing when the activities are within walking distance, 60°x6; 51% of the sample also said one site was best. The preferred length of a carnival as reported by the respondents is two days, 47%; 43% are of the opinion that one day is sufficient. Respondents were about equal concerning a festival of 3-5 hours, 16%; and three days, 17%. Summer is by far the preferred season for a festival, 73%. Winter is attractive to only 8% of the respondents. Spring and fall appeal to a quarter of the sample. The respondents are of the opinion that a community festival would provide the opportunity to have fun, 88%; sample food, 77%; and attend performances, 69%. Five (5) respondents identified with an opportunity to organize an activity and nine (9) selected the opportunity to serve on a planning committee. The random sample respondents suggested that Eagan's identity is families, 64%; and growth, 58%. A quarter of the sample also named youth and the Lone Oak Tree. Establishment of the town of Eagan was selected by 53% of the respondents as a historical event that could be celebrated in a festival. Black Dog Village, noted by 25% of the respondents, was the next most frequently selected. Five (5) people noted that they were unfamiliar with the events named in the questionnaire. Who should be involved in planning a community festival? The most frequently mentioned groups are: Chamber of Commerce, 75%; Parks and Recreation, 74%; and the business community, 58%. Of the service groups mentioned, 49% thought the Jaycees should be involved. Thirty-nine percent (39%) thought senior citizens should be among the planners. Schools and churches are suggested by 35% of the sample. Page -3- Should a new community festival be announced; 16 respondents, 21 % of the sample, said they would serve on the planning committee, 1% would organize a club they belong to in planning an activity, 14% (11 people) would work in a booth. Seventy-nine percent (79%) would bring their families to events, and 32% would take part in activities on their own. Five percent (5%) probably would not attend. The median rating for the importance of developing a new community festival is 6. The scale is from 1 to 10, 10 being highest. Sixteen people responded to the opportunity to comment. The general tenor is that a festival would help to create a community identity. A need for stronger attention to the arts is mentioned. Two of the comments suggested expanding the July 4 Celebration. Mention is made by one individual to not use taxpayer's money. ANALYSIS Staffs' "nut shell" analysis of the random sample survey results is that despite strong support by some respondents, there is lack of support by others. The resultant median importance of 6 is less than strong endorsement. A description of what the survey respondents are saying is: I the Chamber of Commerce, Parks and Recreation, the business community and some service organizations plan a community festival to celebrate the establishment of the Town of Eagan; for one or two days in the summer, individuals and families would come to a site where all activity is within walking distance to watch a parade and fireworks, sample food at various booths, browse through arts and crafts showings and attend entertainment performances. Less than half, 39%, say a carnival is of interest. Potential workers and organizers from the community are a small percentage of the respondents. SUB GROUPS Scientifically, groups smaller than 30 provide information that is less reliable than what is received from larger groups. Staff has looked at four sub groups that range in size from 20 to 32 respondents to note whether opinions differ from those of the sample as a whole. Have lived in Eagan less than 5 years: 32 respondents. The median importance placed on developing a new community festival is 7 for this group. Newer residents in Eagan would come to a one day festival in the summer. The Chamber of Commerce and Parks & Recreation should be primary planners. The festival celebrating the establishment of the Town of Eagan should be one to which they would bring their families to have fun, attend fireworks, parades, arts and crafts booths, sample food and attend entertainment. Four (4) would serve on a planning committee or work in their club's booth. Less than half name a carnival as being of interest. Page -4- Have lived in Eagan 6-10 years: 24 respondents. The median importance placed on developing a new community festival is 5 for this group. However, this sub-group of the sample contains the highest number of persons who would serve on planning committees, organize their club or work at an event; they represent half of the volunteers found in the total sample. This group prefers a two-day festival; all other opinions concerning overall planning and events of interest mirror the total sample. Households of two adults. no children: 20 respondents. The median importance this group places on the establishment of a new community festival is 6. Some potential planners and workers are found in this group. A two-day festival in the summer is a slight favorite. These adults would look to the same groups for leadership (Chamber, Parks & Recreation and the business community) as other groups have. Households of two adults would take part themselves and bring families to enjoy fireworks, arts & crafts booths, sample food, attend performances and to have fun. Two adults, two children. 20 respondents. The median importance for establishment of a new community festival is 6. The group offers one individual interested in planning and one to work in a booth. Parks & Recreation is the most frequently mentioned group for planning and conducting a festival. The Chamber and the business community are mentioned next. A one-day, summer festival with all activity in walking distance is preferred by this group. They would bring their families to have fun celebrating the establishment of the Town of Eagan in all of the activities mentioned by other sub- groups. Again, carnivals are of interest to less than half of this segment of the sample. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The results of the random sample provide modest preliminary support for a new community festival. No action is required of the Commission at this time. The soon-to-be tabulated results of the warming shelter survey may convey additional information. And, the survey distribution to service groups, though planned to occur in the near future, has not yet been undertaken. KV:DP/lk L31SURVEY.RES