06/19/1995 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Monday, June 19, 1995
7:00 PM
Blackhawk Middle School
A. 6:00 PM Park Tour
B. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting
C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:02 pm
D. Approval of Agenda 7:03 pm
E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 11, 1995 7:05 pm
F. Visitors to be Heard 7:07 pm
G. Department Happenings Pages 3-5 7:08 pm
H. Consent Agenda
(1) Park Center Fifth Addition - TCF Bank Pages 7-28 7:13 pm
1. Development Proposals
(1) Eagan Promenade Pages 29-48 7:15 pm
(2) Oakpointe of Eagan - OCP HOmes, Inc. Pages 49-76 7:45 pm
(3) Cliff Lake Shores - Hoffman Homes, Inc. Pages 77-100 8:00 pm
(4) Apollo Addition - R.L. Johnson Co. Pages 101-120 8:15 pm
J. Old Business
(1) Borchert Ingersoll Property Agreement/Gopher Smelting
K. New Business
(1) Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy Pages 121-126 8:45 pm
(2) Draft of Behavior Policy Pages 127-130 9:15 pm
L. Parks Development Update 9:30 pm
M. Water Resources Update
(1) Pond JP-23 Update Pages 131-134 9:45 pm
(2) Schedule Natural Resources Subcommittee Meeting
Water Quality Mgmt Update/No Phospherous Fertilizer
(3) Fish Lake Dosing Update
N. Other Business and Reports
(1) Ecosystem Based Management Report/Challenge Grant Pages 135-139 10:00 pm
(2) City of Eagan' Boulevard Tree Inventory
0. Round Table 10:20 pm
P. Adjournment 10:30 pm
The City of Eagan is carunitted to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without
regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the events. if a ratite of less
than 96 hours is received, the City will make every attempt to provide the aids.
city of eagan MEMO
DATE: JUNE 16, 1995
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SUBJECT: JUNE 19, 1995 COMMISSION MEETING
The Commission will begin their evening with a tour of the Civic Arena followed by a visit
to the Borchert/Ingersoll property. Commission Members are asked to meet at Blackhawk
Middle School so that the tour can begin at 6:00 p.m.
As you can see, the agenda is quite lengthy but we should be able to get through all
agenda items as noted. Although the Borchert/Ingersoll is on the agenda, we currently
do not have an agreement for the Commission to respond to but there may be some
discussion as we tour the site prior to the meeting.
As usual, if you are unable to attend this meeting, please contact Cherryl at 681-4661.
Respectfully submitted,
Ke Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
KV:cm
Subject to aooroval
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF
ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 19, 1995
A regular meeting.of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. on June 19, 1995 with the following Commission Members present: Ken Tyler,
Stephen Thompson, Lee Markell, John Rudolph, Tom Walkington, Michael Vincent, Sherie Wallace and
Jonathan Widem. Commission Members David Szott, Cindy Lynch and George Kubik were not present.
Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of
Recreation, Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent; C.J. Lilly, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner; Rich Brasch,
Water Resources Coordinator; Gregg Hove, Forestry Supervisory; Paula Nowariak, Recreation Supervisor;
Amy Seivers, Recreation Intern and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary.
AGENDA
Director Vraa noted that the Borchert Ingersoll/Gopher Smelting Agreement listed under Old
Business should be deferred to the July agenda. Mosquito Control Update was also added as item 3 under
Other Business and Reports. John Rudolph moved, Michael Vincent seconded with all members voting in
favor to accept the agenda as amended.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 11, 1995
Stephen Thompson moved, Michael Vincent seconded with all members voting in favor to accept
the minutes of the May 11, 1995 meeting as presented.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
t 1
Items highlighted by Director Vraa included 200 participants for the June 3 softball clinic; growth
of the sand volleyball league to 22 teams from 14 in 1995; summer program registrations exceeded the
4,000 mark; the clean up of the Holz Farm property was a successful neighborhood project; volunteer for
various park projects were identified and recognized for their contributions and over 200 soil tests had been
requested from residents in the Fish and Schwartz Lake watersheds. -
CONSENT AGENDA
Jonathan Widem moved, Michael Vincent seconded with all members voting in favor to make the
following recommendations to the City Council relative to the following proposal:
1. Park Cliff Fifth Addition - TCF Bank. This proposal would be responsible for a cash parks
dedication and a cash trails dedication. Water quality requirements were previously met
for this site and the entire Park Center PD with the construction of a detention basin (Pond
AP-50). There are no significant trees located on this site.
EAGAN PROMENADE
Director Vraa introduced this item as a Preliminary Development Plan for Eagan Promenade
Development and a Preliminary Subdivision of 13 lots and 5 outlots on approximately 120 acres located in
the northeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and 1-35E int he S 1/2 of Section 10. Director Vraa noted
that the developer is proposing to provide a 14.62 acre park land dedication and although the quantity of
land generally meets the commercial park land dedication standards, the quality (i.e. usability) of this land
is an issue for the Commission to consider. Vraa continued that the Commission reviewed this proposal at
a special workshop to determine how parks dedication, trails dedication, water quality and tree
preservation would impact this development.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
f Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 2
After the June 13 workshop review Vraa continued, the Commission made several
recommendations to the Central Area Task Force as they reviewed this site as a 'city center. Director Vraa
also noted that staff had provided several options for parks dedication as well as reviewing the tree
preservation, water quality and wetland issues. The June 13th workshop focused primarily on what park
dedication requirements would be for this development. The four options provided for Commission review
included accepting the 14.62 acres of parkland dedication as shown in the Opus Promenade proposal; to
remove and/or relocate the community retail shops and accept a parkland dedication of approximately 18
acres; accept a cash parks dedication or another option that the Commission may want to consider.
Discussion occurred during the workshop relative to the proposed 35,000 sq.ft. proposed
community center footprint provided within the proposed parkland for this development. As a point of
comparison, it was noted that the current Civic Arena is 36,000 square feet and there was concern
expressed by Commission members that a 35,000 square foot facility may not meet the needs that the
public has requested need to be incorporated within a community center. Director Vraa concluded that the
Central Area Task Force will soon be formulating their criteria and recommendations for this site with all
comments going to the June 27 Advisory Planning Commission and on to the July 11 City Council meeting.
Michele Foster, Senior Director of Real Estate for Opus Corporation addressed the Commission
indicating that she was heading up the Eagan Promenade project. Ms Foster explained that Opus has
been working on this project with the Central Area Task Force of over one year to help this development
reflect the City's vision for this development. It was anticipated that the plan being proposed reflected the
City's interests regarding tree preservation, water quality/wetlands and' parks/trails dedication. Opus
specifically was interested in obtaining feedback from various factions of the City to provide a development
that will fit the needs of the City.
Ms. Foster continued that the easterly 25-30 acres encompassed large treed areas and the developer
approached the whole site when considering the tree preservation, wetland and park dedication issues.
They have worked to preserve specimen trees as much as possible but visibility of the development has
remained an important aspect.
Tom Healy of Healy,Ramme Developers indicated they are developing the residential area to the
northeast of this proposed development and want to continue working cooperatively with the City staff to
create a viable residential development as part of this overall development. Mr. Healy commented that the
buildings have been designed with front/back grading to reduce grading limits. They will continue looking
at the development to see how they can continue to best preserve trees maintaining the feasibility of the
project.
Member Markell commented that the Commission has been wrestling with the scale of the project
since they have not, in the past, reviewed a proposal as extensive as the Eagan Promenade. Mr. Markell
expressed his concern with the development as it is being proposed, indicating the scope of the
development is very extensive for the site. Member Markell asked if this parks development, as proposed,
would be a development the City would be proud of in the near-term and long term.
Member Vincent, who participated in the Central Area Task Force discussions, explained that the
Task Force is interested in hearing what recommendations the APRNRC makes for the development of a
community park within this development. It was noted that the Task Force had considered multiple items
on the "wish list' for a community park, however they were aware that not all of the options could be
incorporated within a park as is being proposed. Vincent added that another option may be to acquire the
entire eastern portion of this development,and if the City decides not to develop it as a park, it could be
sold for future commercial or residential development.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
C Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 3
Member Tyler expressed his desire to have the Council provide a clear direction for the
Commission to pursue. He suggested that if the Council envisions this proposed parkland as a potential
'city center park', direction as to the facilities that could/should be incorporated along with an indication of
initial funding and funding to maintain those facilities, should be provided by the Council. Tyler also
commented that the facilities, as shown in the development plan, do not appear to fit into the site.
Member Vincent suggested a bond referendum might provide the funding if a decision is made to
acquire all or a portion of the Promenade site for future park development. Again, asking if it would be
feasible to sell the property if development for park purposes was not to occur, Vincent asked if this was an
option for the Commission to consider. Director Vraa responded that this option has not been discussed in
any detail so he did not know what all of the options may be.
Michele Foster commented that Opus currently has a buyer for the residential property on the
northeastern portion of the site and would be concerned about any delay in moving forward with the
proposed development.
Member Tyler expressed concern for placing a community park adjacent to the six-lane Yankee
Doodle Road and to a large commercial site. Tyler continued that if the City is looking for an urban park
to host a 4th of July event, this site is not large enough given the net developable area of approximately 4
acres. He opined that it would be in the best interest of the City to take a cash dedication for this
development and attempt to find a larger site for future park development. Member Markell reminded the
Commission that in their review of open space needs this site was looked at for natural space preservation
and again opined that it would be in the best interest of the City to acquire the entire eastern portion of the
site, at a minimum, for natural space preservation and/or future development.
Member Widem opined that since the Commission had reviewed this proposal previously, there
should be no reason to further delay this process. If there is an option to acquire the eastern portion of the
site, Widem agreed that more land would provide additional park opportunities for the city. Member
Vincent reiterated his opinion that as much of the land as feasibly possible should be acquired so as to
preserve as many options as possible. Again, Vincent stated, if the land is not developed, the City could
sell it. Member Tyler didn't feel this would be a viable option for the City and expressed concern for tying
the developer's hands in proceeding with their plans for development. Member Vincent concurred that
since Opus had a potential buyer/developer for the residential site, they may not want to speculate on the
possibility of the City acquiring the property at a later date.
Michelle Foster commented that Opus has been working on this project well over one year. She
stated that the development proposal, as presented, has a limited window of opportunity to be successful.
There has been significant input from the Central Area Task Force as well as City staff relative to this
development and Opus feels it is a good proposal with significant commercial tenants ready to begin
construction in early 1996. It is hoped that the stores will be ready for delivery to the tenants late 1996.
Opus would, Michelle continued, reluctantly look at the option for the City to purchase the residential
property if there was the means and interest to pursue that option in a timely manner. Opus is interested in
moving ahead with this entire development as quickly as possible.
Member Wallace stated that a lot of dreams and ideas have been invested into this development,
identifying this as a 'city center' site. The eastern portion (residential site) provides quite a challenge for
development and Wallace questioned whether the site could be developable as park land if it were
acquired by the City. If the City was to purchase the entire parcel of land it may not provide the
recreational opportunities perceived by the Central Area Task Force for a 'city center'. Not only would the
acquisition costs be extensive, the development of this site could be cost prohibitive, Wallace concluded.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 4
After further discussion, Jonathan Widem moved, Tom Walkington seconded the motion to make
the following recommendations to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council relative to the parks
and trails dedication requirement for the Eagan Promenade development:
1. Acquisition of the entire property east of Promenade Avenue should be pursued by the City
with staff researching funding options and various development options for the site.
2. This development would be responsible for sidewalks on both sides of streets.
Those voting Aye included, Michael Vincent, Stephen Thompson, Lee Markell, John Rudolph,
Jonathan Widem, and Tom Walkington. Those voting Nay included Ken Tyler and Sherie Wallace. The
motion passed.
Member Thompson asked if staff research determines it is not feasible to acquire the parkland will
the recommendation then be for a cash parks dedication. Member Widem opined that if the City Council
chooses not to acquire the land, they will then "make a decision relative to parks dedication. Director Vraa,
as a point of clarification, asked if the Commission consensus was that the land east of Promenade Avenue
be acquired as a first option and if that was not feasible that a cash dedication be required for the
development. The Commission members concurred.
Lee Markel) moved, Stephen Thompson seconded with all members voting in favor to make the
following recommendations relative to the Eagan Promenade development:
1. This development will be responsible for on-site ponding as the primary measure to mitigate
water quality impacts to the development.
2. Any change in the two-cell replacement pond proposed for Pond DP-4 in the revised site plan
dated 5/19/95 be re-evaluated by staff and the APRNRC.
3. Proposed Pond DP-4.3 shall be constructed using a two-cell design having a similar total wet
volume as shown on the revised site plan dated 5/19/95 and the configuration of the pond is to
be more irregular to create the appearance of a more natural pond.
4. Ponds DP-6 and D5.1 shall be excavated per water resources staff direction to fully meet water
quality treatment requirements for the residential portion of the site.
5. The APRNRC and staff shall review and develop a recommendation on whether to recommend
to the City Council approval of the wetland replacement plan once a complete plan has been
submitted and the 30 day public comment period is over.
6. The total tree removal of 43.7% is less than allowable removal for total site development,
however, the proposed Tree Preservation Plan should be reconsidered with some re-design of
building location for the following reasons:
a. Commercial development (west side) has greatly exceeded the City of Eagan adopted
Tree Preservation Policy allowable tree removal limit, proposing to remove over 94%
of the existing tree resource. A consideration may be given to incorporating some of
the existing tree mass into the parking lot area.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Minutes of June 19 Meeting
Page 5
OAKPOINT OF EAGAN - OCP HOMES, INC.
Director Vraa introduced this item as a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Preliminary
Planned Development Amendment for 35 zero lot line single family homes and a Preliminary Subdivision
for 35 lots and four outlots on 10.30 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue and east of Plaza Drive south of
Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32. Vraa continued that this development would be subject to a cash
parks dedication and a cash trails dedication.
Forestry Supervisor Hove explained that the tree preservation plan as submitted is acceptable. The
plan shows the existence of 206 significant trees with the proposed development resulting in the removal of
47 significant trees (22.8% of the total) during the initial phase of development. Allowable removal for this
phase is 25%. Hove also described tree preservation related management activities which will take place
on site throughout the development.
Resources Coordinator Brasch explained that runoff from over 90% of the developed site will be
discharged to Pond AP-14, a designated sediment trap, with the remaining 10% draining to a storm sewer
that discharges to Pond AP-15, another designated sediment trap. Because there appears to be more cost-
effective alternatives to improve water quality in Cliff Lake, a cash dedication is being recommended for
this development. Director Vraa quickly addressed parks dedication and trails dedication indicated that a
cash dedication would be required for both.
After a brief discussion, Stephen Thompson moved, Michael Vincent seconded with all members
voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Oakpointe of Eagan:
1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication based on single family
development.
2. This development shall be responsible for a cash trail dedication based on single family
development.
3. The Tree Preservation Plan as submitted is acceptable.
4. The only jurisdictional wetland identified within the development site is the wetland complex
associated with Pond AP-14. No encroachment into, or drainage of this wetland is proposed
for this development.
5. This development shall be responsible for a cash water quality dedication.
CLIFF LAKE SHORES - HOFFMAN HOMES, INC.
Director Vraa introduced this item explaining this is a request for a Preliminary Planned
Development Amendment to allow a residential development and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of
73 lots and one outlot on approximately 24 acres identified as Outlot E, Cliff Lake Centre, south of Cliff
Lake Road, west of 1.35E and northeast of Cliff Lake in the SW 1/4 of Section 29.
Forestry Supervisor Hove explained that the developer is proposing a single phase development that
is allowed a significant tree removal of 47.5%. There are a total of 156 significant trees on site and the
developer is proposing to remove 42, or 26.7%, therefore no mitigation is required.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
( Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 6
Relative to wetlands, Coordinator Brasch explained that the developer is proposing to maintain a
50' wide buffer of existing vegetation measured back from the ordinary high water mark. This buffer should
be identified and designated as a permanently protected area on the Grading Plan and the limits of this area
should be marked in the field prior to any site grading.
Brasch explained that stormwater generated from this site will be directed off-site to an existing
storm water basin (AP-23) located on the south side of Cliff Lake Road. Because of the off-site location, a
cash dedication is being requested. Care should be taken during grading and construction to prevent
erosion from occurring from the steep slope on the west side of the site on to the shopping center property.
Director Vraa added that the outlot would be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails
dedication.
Pat Hoffman, Hoffman Homes, Inc. explained that the development for this site proposes a move-
up townhouse product. The development is proposing three unit types with a base price starting at
$100,000 for the quad units and $140-180,000 for the two duplex unit types. The developer opined that
this will be a high amenity development.
Member Rudolph noted that the road dead ends near the parking lot of Cub Foods and asked if any
thought had been given to providing a trail to connect to the commercial property. Mr. Hoffman
responded there was no plan to connect the townhouse development to the adjacent commercial
development primarily to reduce public nuisance to the lake and into the development. Hoffman
concluded that it is the intention that the land will be owned by the association and private property.
Member Wallace asked if the road within the complex could incorporate a path to encourage
walking to the adjacent commercial properties. Mr. Hoffman reiterated that that was not the intention of
the developer and that the existing topography may preclude providing a trail linkage to the commercial
property. Tim Erkkila, consultant for Hoffman Development, explained that the residential property was
approximately 25 feet higher than the parking lot area of Cub Foods. The developer also did not feel that
integrating a residential area with the loading area of a commercial property was a good mix.
After further brief discussion, Lee Markell moved, Ken Tyler seconded with all members voting in
favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Cliff Lake Shores:
1. This plat is within Park Service District 30 which is served by Meadowlands and Rahn Park.
Meadowlands Park was the dedication park from this P.U.O. Consequently, there is no park
dedication with this subdivision. However, the exception shown for future development will
be required to make a cash dedication at the time of development. The proposal appears t
meet the requirement for providing open space for informal recreation opportunities. The trails
dedication has also been fulfilled for this development under the P.U.O.
2. Pond AP-23 is located on the other side of Cliff Lake Road and because it is off site, a cash
water quality dedication shall be required.
3. The 50 foot wide buffer of existing vegetation , measured back from the ordinary high water
mark. shall be identified and designated as a 'permanently protected area on the Grading Plan.
The limits of this area shall also be marked in the field prior to any site grading.
4. The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable as presented.
5. The developer shall provide tree protective measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is
greater, of the significant treestwoodlands to be preserved.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 7
6. The developer shall contact the City Forester at least five days prior to any site grading to
ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
APOLLO ADDITION - R.L. JOHNSON CO.
Director Vraa introduced this item as a Preliminary Subdivision in order to split the 39.4 acre part
of Lot 7,Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 in two parcels and a Conditional Use Permit to
allow outdoor storage of semi trailers on proposed Lot 1. The site, Vraa continued is located south of the
Apollo Road/Lunar Lane intersection and west of Mike Collins Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 11. It was
also noted that the closed park is North Park.
Relative to tree preservation, Supervisor Hove explained that the site contains approximately
125,000 sq. ft. of significant woodlands and ten significant trees. The developer is proposing to remove
73% of the significant woodlands and 100% of the significant trees resulting in tree mitigation of 229
Category B trees in addition to standard landscaping required. The developer is proposing to plant the
mitigation trees around the new building site and along the railroad tracks south and east of the existing
building. Hove continued that although over 100 mitigation trees proposed to be planted along the south
property line will serve no tangible purpose other than meeting mitigation requirements, staff is suggesting
off-site mitigation for these approximate 100 trees. Commission members Vincent and Markell opined that
the trees should be planted at various park sites, as appropriate.
Coordinator Brasch explained that there are existing culverts that drain a large portion of Lot 1 to
Pond DP-1 which has caused erosion problems on the banks of EP-1 at the point of discharge. The
developer should provide a larger on-site storm water pond or route all of the run-off to EP-1 and mitigate
the erosion problems by extending the culvert pipes from the present location to a point at the normal
water level of EP-1. Because there are no recreational water bodies downstream from EP-1, a cash water
quality dedication is being requested. Brash also noted there were no wetlands on. site.
After a brief discussion, Michael Vincent moved, Stephen Thompson seconded with all members
voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Appollo Addition:
1. This development will be subject to a cash parks dedication.
2. This development will be subject to a cash trails dedication.
3. This development is responsible for providing 229 Category B trees in addition to the standard
landscaping required. Off site mitigation will be required for approximately 100 of the
mitigation trees to be planted. These trees should be placed on public property.
4. The developer shall provide tree protective measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is
greater, of the significant treestwoodlands to be preserved.
5. The developer shall contact the City Forester at least five days prior to any site grading to
ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
6. This development shall be responsible for a cash water quality dedication.
7. There are no wetlands on this site.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 8
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK POLICY
Director Vraa introduced this item explaining that the City Council has requested that the APRNRC
review the draft Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy and provide any recommendations regarding modifications and
that they review the existing pedestrian crosswalk on Wilderness Run Road at Wedgewood Drive
connecting the Wedgewood Addition to Walnut Hill Park to determine if a higher level of pedestrian
crossing should be provided beyond existing pavement markings and signage.
Public Works Director Colbert explained that a petition has been submitted asking for a 4-way stop
at Wilderness Run Road and Wedgewood. In reviewing this request,speed, traffic count, accident history
and site distance were taken into consideration. Based on information obtained and using the uniform
manual for control, Director Colbert stated there were not sufficient warrants to provide a 4-way stop at this
intersection. The residents near this area have indicated that if stop signs are not an option, they would
like to see a higher level of pedestrian crossing through flashing lights, or other methods. It was noted that
there have been 18 pedestrian accidents in the past 4 years with only 2 location where more than 1
accident occurred. Six of the accidents were at signalized intersections and 8 of the 18 were along Diffley
Road.
It was noted that there is concern for a false sense of security with crosswalks and traffic engineers
caution that these should be used sparingly. If a flashing beacon is to be recommended, the question
would be whether it should be pedestrian activated of operational 24 hours a day. There is some concern,
Colbert continued that a pedestrian activated flasher creates an even greater sense of false security.
Member Vincent asked if a pedestrian activated stop had been considered. Colbert responded that that
option had not been pursued. Vincent added that the City needs to be very selective in their use of
crossings to avoid a false sense of security.
Stephen Thompson commented that the crossing at Pilot Knob Road and Wilderness Run Road is
also another very difficult one. Colbert responded that that intersection, along with Highline
Trail/Lexington Avenue and Johnny Cake/Covington, may warrant further investigation as well.
Member Wallace opined that we are in the business of getting people out and walking but
expressed concern for the costs involved in stop signs and signalization for pedestrian crossings. Wallace
suggested an option such as 'rumble strips' in the roadway to alert drivers to a slower speed of impending
pedestrian crosswalk. Director Colbert responded that staff will pursue this option as well, however, the
City Council is looking for direction and input from the APRNRC so the issue can return to the City Council
on July 18.
Member Wallace suggested that this issue be. reviewed at greater length at the sub-committee level
and provide input to the APRNRC on July 17 for a recommendation to the City Council for their July 18
meeting.
Patty Schilling stated she had started this process in May, 1993 to try to provide a safer access to
Walnut Hill Park from the Wedgewood neighborhood given the high speed of motorists in this area and the
restricted view those motorists have. She opined that the reports being referenced that establish criteria for
signalization are based on a straight road for a safe stopping distance. She stated that the restrictive view
on this street provide a difficult issue to resolve. Schilling explained that the residents are attempting to
cross into Walnut Hill Park and find it extremely difficult and dangerous because of the speed of the traffic,
and restricted view. She stated that most people crossing to the park are children or parents and their small
children in strollers or on bikes requiring more time than adults alone may need. Director Colbert
responded that all groups are taken into account when analyzing crosswalk criteria with the exception of
physically challenged individuals.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Minutes of June 19, 1995 Meeting
Page 9
After further discussion, Sherie Wallace moved, Michael Vincent seconded with all members voting
in favor to defer this item to the Recreation Sub-committee meeting on Thursday, June 21 and that a
recommendation be brought back to the full Commission at their July 17 meeting for review and
recommendation to the City Council. This review will be relative to crosswalks as they apply to access to
parks.
DRAFT OF BEHAVIOR POLICY
Recreation Supervisor Nowariak explained that after the 1994 summer programs, staff had
recommended that the Commission consider adopting a uniform behavior policy for program participants.
The Recreation Subcommittee has reviewed this draft policy that has been compiled following research
from several other cities and public agencies. Staff is asking that the Commission make a recommendation
relative to this policy so that it can be incorporated in the summer programs currently underway.
Member Wallace thanked Supervisor Nowariak for her report and the research and analysis that has
gone into this behavior policy. Wallace moved, Rudolph seconded with all members voting in favor to
accept the Behavior Policy as presented and have it distributed to parents and participants currently
enrolled in summer programs.
BORCHERT/INGERSOLL PROPERTY ACQUISITION UPDATE
Director Vraa explained that the owner of property east of Mike Collins Drive, north or Yankee
Doodle Road and west of the Borchert/Ingersoll property will be developing. The owner has approached
the City to see if there was interest in acquiring any or several of the lots to incorporate into North Park.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and feels that Lot 7 has the opportunity to continue the trail around the
wetland within North Park.
After a brief discussion, Stephen Thompson moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members
voting in favor to direct staff to pursue discussions with the land owner to attempt to acquire lot(s) and
easements to provide a trail around the wetland within North Park.
PARKS DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Parks Planner/Landscape Architect Lilly reviewed several park projects currently underway
including, trail alignment on the south side of the Borchert/Ingersoll property, landscaping and playground
for Holz Farm Park, irrigation and fencing at Lexington Diffley Athletic site, refined landscaping plan for the
Municipal Center/Civic Arena site and playground for Red Pine Elementary School.
WATER RESOURCES UPDATE
Water Resources Coordinator Brasch explained that the Natural Resources Subcommittee met May
31 relative to Pond JP-23. The issues that arose during a meeting with the residents included whether the
NWL could be raised or lowered, what measures the City and residents could take to protect water quality
in the pond, and the process for addressing a change in the classification of the pond. Rich explained that
a written evaluation for the reclassification of Pond JP-23 will be provided at the July 17 Commission
meeting.
Another issue for the Commission to address is the review of the water quality management plan.
Brasch suggested setting a date for a Natural Resources Sub-committee meeting to review this issue further.
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
MAY/JUNE, 1995
1. A very successful block party and information fair was held at Wescott Commons on June 3.
Residents purchased dinner tickets in advance of the event and meals were served , with the help
of the Eagan Police Department, to approximately 150 hungry folks. The building owners donated
funds to support the event and the Eagan Fire Department provided 2 hours of sprinklers for
everyone to enjoy. A much appreciated refresher on such a hot day!
2. An information fair was also held at Cinnamon Ridge on June 3 with representatives from agencies
such as Minnesota Valley Transit, Community Education Adult Basic Education and Eagan Parks
and Recreation. Information was provided to residents on how to obtain help or give help to those
in need. This was the first event planned at Cinnamon Ridge and there was great interest by the
residents for more.
3. New Youth Development programs emerging for the summer include youth basketball at Wescott,
Sky Hill, Rahn, O'Leary and Bridle Ridge Parks; Fun Streets at Quarry Park and Cinnamon Ridge
Park; and a Mini Camp at Wescott Commons after the kids are out of school which will include an
adult supervised overnight in the park with tents, games and great fun. There will continue to be
programs all day at Wescott Commons and weekly at Cinnamon Ridge and Quarry Parks.
4. The softball clinic had 200 participants on June 3. The clinic had been originally scheduled for
May 13, a rainy day, which necessitated postponement. Staff are pleased that virtually everyone
who registered was able to adjust to the date change. Sandy Hillyer and the EHS varsity softball
team did a terrific job with the clinic.
5. The men's tennis league and the co-rec tennis leagues begin the week of June S. Twenty-two men
registered for this league and co-rec tennis has 22 teams.
6. Sand volleyball has grown to 22 teams. Last year 14 teams participated. League play begins June
12 at the Rahn Athletic sand volleyball courts. Monday and Friday evening leagues are planned.
7. The Eagan Seniors 12th annual picnic is scheduled for Thomas Lake Park. The Department
provides hot dogs and brats. The seniors bring pot luck. Typically 60-70 people take part.
8. Registration for summer recreation activities are arriving in a steady stream. The mail and the drop
box are used heavily. In addition, the numbers of over the counter registrations increase daily.
Summer in the Park, tennis and a variety of camps are the most popular.
9. Concession receipts have now surpassed expenditures. The activity will continue to expand its
positive position over the next two months.
10. Baseball teams playing on the Goat Hill major fields have been able to adjust game times as
necessitated by the field light problems the facility has experienced. Staff anticipates that the
significant repair will be completed by the end of this month.
11. By the end of this month the Department should also learn whether the Community Development
Block Grant application submitted for the junior program at Wescott is successful. The HRA has
approved funding. Final approval is issued by HUD.
12. The Eagan Summer Tennis Tournament will be held on June 10 and 11. This is the first occasion,
after several attempts, that a local adult tennis tournament will proceed. Approximately 50 people
will participate; as of this writing.
13. A representative from West Publishing, speaking for a small 4 team soccer league, has approached
the Department for access to playing their games at Wescott Station Park. In that the youth
program and commitments made to other adult teams utilize all other soccer field space, a permit
will be written for Wescott Station Park.
The group has agreed to park at West Publishing to avoid congestion in the neighborhood. The
soccer field itself is at quite a distance from homes.
14. Adult slo-pitch softball is already at the halfway point in the season! 213 teams enjoy a variety of
leagues Sunday through Friday evenings and Wednesday mornings.
15. Ten hard-working individuals helped to clean up the grounds of the Holz Farm property Saturday,
June 3. Much of the large material was gathered for hauling away and trees and shrubs were
pruned. Weeding in the garden area was begun but that job will take many hours of back-
wrenching labor. Several 'treasures' were found including older harnesses, chicken feeders, a
wagon axle and numerous other items that only Ted Wachter knows what the heck they are.
Thanks to Jim McGuffee and the mowing crew and Gregg Hove and the forestry division for doing
the initial grounds work to help beautify the site and return the farm toward it's 'lived in'
condition.
16. The Holz Farm Task Force met May 24 for its inaugural meeting. The group is enthusiastic and
open-minded. The Task Force plans to meet on the fourth Wednesday of each month. Three sub-
committees are gathering information on the family history, the area history and inspection of the
condition of all of the buildings. Their initial findings will be reported at their June 28 meeting.
Also at the June meeting, plans will be made for a summer event to be held at the site. An overall
progress update is planned for the APRNRC and City Council at their respective September
meetings.
17. This year again the Parks Department has received some very much appreciated volunteer
assistance as installation of new plant material takes place. The following people/organizations
deserve recognition for their efforts:
Volunteer Project Description
Jackie Grinde O'Leary Park, landscape bed at south park entrance
Lutheran Brotherhood Tree/shrub planting at Thomas Lake Park pavilion/trail
(Bob Vrudany) area
Dakota Middle School Global Studies Prairie wildflower planting at Thomas Lake Prairie
Group (Lonnie Perry)
Diffley Road/Countryside Drive Tree/shrub planting along sloped right-of-way, north side
Neighborhood Group (Dave Kigan) of Diffley
Girl Scout Troop 1979 (Linda Ashton) Flower planting at Evergreen Park
Valley Viewers 4-H Club (Larry Martin) Shrub planting in parking lot island at Rahn Park (west)
Jamie O'Brien (Eagle Scout Project) Shrub/tree planting around observation deck at Skyhill
Park
Boy Scout Pack 453 (Gretchen Pittenger) Tree/shrub landscaping at Woodland Elementary School
sign
18. Forestry staff is actively planting approximately 200 oak trees into various parks as replacements
and as general park enhancements.
19. Almost 50 youngsters attended the MinnAqua session held at Trapp Farm Park and Carlson Lake on
Saturday, June 10. The kids spent about two hours in the morning learning what makes a lake
tick, why good water quality is important for good fishing, and how to rig a rod. Fishing at
Carlson Lake followed, with bass up to three pounds and numerous sunfish caught. Jim Storland
once again did an outstanding job of coordinating the event.
20. Work on Pond JP-14 was completed during the week of June S. The project, located in the Fish
Lake watershed, will increase the pollutant removal efficiency of this pond consistent with
Commission recommendations for water quality mitigation for the Woodlands 4th Addition.
21. The City has received an overwhelming response for almost 200 soil tests from residents in the Fish
and Schwanz Lake watersheds. The tests are being offered free of charge, thanks to grant funds
made available by the Metropolitan Council to Dakota County and its communities. City staff
collected more than half the samples the week of June 5 and hope to finish sampling the week of
June 12.
22. Neighborhood-led, City-supported water quality education projects were started in four sub-
watersheds during April ad May. The projects generally include a cooperative arrangement
between the City and interested residents to distribute brochures, stencil catch basins, test lawn
soils for phosphorus content, and conduct monitoring. Without exception, the joint efforts have
been received enthusiastically by residents.
4
CONSENT AGENDA
PARK CLIFF FIFTH ADDITION - TCF BANK
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resorces Commission
June 19, 1995
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION
1. There are no significant trees located on this site
2. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication
3. This development shall be responsible. for a cash trails dedication
4. Water quality requirements were previouslymet for this site and the entire
Park Center PD with the construction of a detention basin (Pond AP-50)
c4/bank.tcf
DRAFT
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: May 18, 1995 CASE: 30-PP-16-5-95
APPLICANT: Twin City Federal Bank HEARING DATE: June 27, 1995
PROPERTY OWNER: Martin F. Colon PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Planned Development Amendment, Preliminary Subdivision (Park
Center Fifth Addition), and a Conditional Use Permit for a Pylon Sign
LOCATION: Outlot D, Park Center Addition
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
ZONING: Planned Development (PD)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Twin City Federal Bank is requesting approval of a Planned Development Amendment to allow
a 37,300 SF retail building, a 30,500 SF retail building, a 195 seat restaurant, and a 5,200 SF
bank with seven drive-thru banking lanes on Outlot D, Park Center Addition, a Preliminary
Subdivision consisting of one lot on approximately 1.5 acres, and a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a pylon sign on property currently platted as Outlot D, Park Center Addition located at the
northwest intersection of Cliff Lake Road and Cliff Road (Co. Rd. #32) in the SE 1/4 of Section
30.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:"
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage,
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use
contemplated.
9.
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds or similar burden.
1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake
Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed
with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein
as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The Park Center Planned Development (PD) Agreement entered into in August 1989, designated
specific uses for four sites within the Park Center Addition. The four uses designated are listed
below:
Planned Development Agreement Ultimate Development
Site 1: 4,500 SF Class I restaurant Taco Bell Restaurant (Class II)
Site 2: 86,600 SF retail strip center undeveloped
Site 3: 6,000 SF retail building Boston Chicken Restaurant
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 3
Site 4: 4,800 SF bank Blockbuster Video
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site (Outlot D) has been previously graded and is relatively flat with no wetlands or
significant trees. As mentioned previously, the 9.8 acre outlot is the last undeveloped portion of
the Park Center Planned Development.
SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan
designations surround the subject property:
North - Rahn Park; zoned and designated Park
South - Undeveloped/Taco Bell; zoned PD and designated Commercial PD (CPD)
East - Cliff Lake Center; zoned PD and designated (CPD)
West - Senior Housing; zoned R-4 and designated D-III, Mixed Residential (6-12 u/ac)
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
A. Preliminary Planned Development Amendment
Phasing - The developer is proposing a two-phase approach for development of this outlot.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The reconfiguration of the future retail development, the
proposed bank, and the reduction in overall square footage will be compatible with existing and
future development in this area.
Site Development Plan - The amendment proposes a reduction in square footage for "Site 2" from
the designated 86,600 SF to approximately 78,400 SF a revised configuration from a retail strip
center and restaurant to two large retail tenants (37,300 SF and 30,500 SF), a 195 seat/5,400 SF
restaurant, and the subject 5,200 SF bank.
Specific users have not been identified for the restaurant or retail buildings; however, the
applicant will be requesting Final Planned Development approval for the bank in conjunction with
the Park Center Fifth Final Subdivision to be located in the northeast corner of Outlot D.
Phase I
The developer is proposing a maximum 5,200 SF TCF bank with six drive-thru teller lanes, one
drive-thru ATM lane, and a by-pass drive lane on the proposed 1.5 acre Lot 1, Block 1, Park
Center Fifth Addition.
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required for the drive-thru service if this property had
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 4
straight zoning but can be specifically permitted as a use in this PD. The Site Plan provides
adequate stacking for each drive-thru lane.
Parking - The developer is requesting to deviate from City standards for the dimension and
amount of On-site parking requirements. The City's policy has been to require 10' wide parking
spaces; however, the developer cannot meet the City's On-site parking requirements for a 5,200
SF bank (26 spaces) with 10 foot wide stalls.
The developer is proposing 16-ten foot wide angled parking spaces for customers and 7-nine foot
wide angled "employee" parking spaces. This mixture of stall sizes results in a parking shortage
of 3 stalls.
Setbacks - As proposed, all parking, drive aisle, and building setbacks are met.
Building Exterior - The developer is proposing a brick building exterior that will be similar to
the brown tone brick used by the three other structures within the PD.
Trash/Recycling - The developer is proposing a brick exterior trash/recycling enclosure on the
north side of the bank building that will be constructed of the same materials used for the
principal building.
Rooftop Mechanical - Elevation drawings provided by the developer show that all rooftop
mechanical equipment will be screened from view.
Signage - The developer is proposing a pylon sign near the southeast comer of the 1.5 acre site;
however, the Park Center Pylon Sign Agreement between Federal Land Company and the City
provided for only four (4) pylon signs for the entire Park Center development, all of which to be
located along Cliff Road. To date, three of the four allotted pylon signs have been constructed.
The proposed pylon sign for the bank is not consistent with the Agreement and therefore, requires
a CUP.
The proposed bank is allowed building signage only on the east building elevation. Directional
signage shown on the Site Plan shall be limited to simple nameplate signs that do not exceed 3
SF in size and the copy shall be limited to simple directions (ie. drive-up teller, one way,
customer parking, etc.) and shall not include the business name or identifying logos.
Landscaping - The Landscape Plan submitted for the proposed bank site is acceptable.
Phase II
Parkin - City Code required On-site parking (437 stalls) is provided on the preliminary
development plan for the two retail buildings and the restaurant. Development of this area will
/O.
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 5
require platting which will likely result in additional right-of-way dedication being required by
Dakota County for Cliff Road which, in turn, will reduce the amount land available for parking.
This could affect the ultimate building area permitted.
Building Exterior - The developer is proposing a brick building exterior that should be similar
to the brown tone brick used by the three other structures within the PD.
Trash/Recycling - All trash and recycling containers should be stored within the principal
buildings or in enclosures that are attached to the building and constructed with similar brick
exteriors to match the principal building.
Rooftop Mechanical - Elevation drawings provided by the developer show that all rooftop
mechanical equipment will be screened from view.
Signage - All signage should comply with the City Code and the Park Center Pylon Sign
Agreement.
Landscaping - The preliminary planting plan is unacceptable. The City's Landscape Ordinance
requires planting islands to occupy at least 5% of any parking area for more than 50 vehicles.
The developer should revise the Preliminary Planting Plan to incorporate additional planting
islands in this large parking area.
The developer is proposing landscaping materials along the southern perimeter of the parking area
along Cliff Road that will continue the theme established on the Taco Bell, Blockbuster Video,
and Boston Chicken sites.
B. Preliminary Subdivision
- The developer is proposing to subdivide a 1.5 acre lot from the 9.8 acre Outlot D, Park
Center Addition.
Grading! Wetlands -The Grading Plan submitted is acceptable. A limited amount of grading will
be necessary to prepare the site for development.
There are no jurisdictional wetlands on this site.
Storm Drainaae/Water Quality - Minor modifications are necessary to the Storm Drainage Plan.
Storm drainage from the site will be routed from south to north to an existing 42" storm pipe
located along the northern edge of the property. The developer should remove the existing
culvert that drains the low ditch area south of the existing access to Taco Bell and provide a
catch basin structure connected to the existing storm sewer located along the east edge of the site.
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 6
Water quality requirements were previously met for this site and the entire Park Center PD with
the construction of a detention basin (Pond AP-50).
Utilities - The Utility Plan is acceptable.
Access/Street Design - The Access Plan is acceptable.
Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - Adequate public right-of-way exists for Cliff Lake Road and
the existing 30' private road easement providing internal access to the proposed bank site, Taco
Bell and the remainder of Outlot D is also adequate.
Tree Preservation - The site contains no significant trees.
Parks and Recreation - The developer will be subject to a cash park and trail dedication.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The proposed Preliminary Planned Development Amendment appears compatible with the area.
The Amendment primarily results in a reconfiguration of the original conceptual layout and a
reduction in ultimate retail square footage to be developed on Outlot D. The proposed bank will
be compatible with existing and future development within the Park Center PD and the area in
general.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To approve/deny a two-phase Preliminary Planned Development Amendment consisting of four
buildings on 9.8 acres identified as Site 2 within the Park Center Planned Development.
To approve/deny the Preliminary Subdivision for Park Center Fifth Addition consisting of one
lot on 1.5 acres.
To approve/deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign on Lot 1,, Block 1, Park Center
Fifth Addition.
Approval subject to the conditions listed below.
Preliminary Planned Development Amendment
Amended PD Agreement/Preliminary Plans
1. The developer shall execute an amendment to the existing Planned Development
Agreement to incorporate the revised layout and terms. The Amended Planned
Development shall expire in 5 years from the date of Council approval.
1,4
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 7
2. The City approves the preliminary Site, Grading, Utility, Lighting, and Elevation Plans
dated 5-1-95 with the latest revision date of 5-26-95.
3. The Preliminary Site Plan provides the following:
a. 5,200 SF bank with seven drive-thru service lanes.
b. 195 seat/5,400 SF Class I restaurant.
c. 30,510 SF retail building.
d. 37,300 SF retail building.
4. All building, parking/drive aisle, and landscaped areas shall be properly maintained.
5. The developer shall remove the existing sidewalk and replace it as shown on the Phase
I Site Plan dated May 25, 1995.
6. A Final Planned Development Agreement for each phase shall be executed prior to final
subdivision and Final Planned Development approval. The following exhibits are
necessary for this Agreement:
* Final Site Plan
* Final Building Elevation Plan
* Final Sign Plan
* Final Landscape Plan
Upon submission of these final plans, provided they are in conformance with the
Preliminary P D, the Final PD may proceed to the City Council for approval.
7. All buildings shall be constructed of brick that matches the type and color of the brick
used on the previous development's within the Park Center PD.
Trash Enclosure/RooftoR Mechanical
8. All trash/recycling containers shall be stored within the building or in an enclosure
attached to the principal building and constructed with a brick exterior to match the
principal building.
9. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view.
Siangge
10. All building/directional and pylon signage shall comply with the City Code and the Park
Center Pylon Sign Agreement.
Landscaping
/j .
Planning Report - Park Center Fifth Addition
June 27, 1995
Page 8
11. The developer shall revise the Preliminary Planting Plan to incorporate additional planting
islands to equal at least 5 percent of the large parking area.
12. All landscaped and green areas shall be served by an underground irrigation system.
Preliminary Subdivision
Standard Conditions
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council on February 3, 1993:
Al, B1, Cl, C2, C4, E1, Fl, and H1.
2. The developer shall plat the property.
3. The developer shall provide a catch basin structure connected to the existing storm sewer
along the east edge of the site to, drain storm run off from the ditch south of the existing
access point to Taco Bell.
/4.
U l~ QOM' V'~ O i~1 "al`
I~ got I' , l ' RK YpOttrycr
t r~ b . a. • n ~
} .AH(IRp •p "M.LLI..'~iYt... ; MNPpY
ar1 y !7 t fill
.7 DWCN%VCWM DR
r R IALtMIf INK
71 Qw
LIAN
Pt. +A i A W1
`E
PARK
~~t.~ y~ .i j, w I~ J~/~ lJ~ 15 ~ ' c a..AtA00GL"`` In
]Y Ttt ~ a ' «I ~a.wwr~wl WAY
.er POW
p i S vl VI I JT L '
C LLIJ T ~
6
GONA
cma I~
I f AA P C x CAN
L1 a,
43
all 43.
lamp( f+Z.
r
I v N
wwow " L( RAH N
we Y
O' LAKE k vi
Co. no. o Gtir NOAD Mi~?A+T t . .
AY 11111 A. WA /~t1A1~~\~/(/1" ys 5~ Ilrl
CT.
3• O 1
W2 C& KF Rra Ir
ii T P q
PAIL w s ; .
3
RnCECLIfF RK mil '
11~ up" Ff. Sam VT.
1 G 7r we& If. W fT LOW M y
1 S ~ 1MI/ Mt,
146- WOO" T. GR.
N o- 6,Afa„pm /f, >1~11{'YI f+f. .
11?- rMl«vut IT. SM- KIA ?t.
NTM n.
-I P I
APPLE VALLEY
LOCATION
P..
fi~4~\~~\\~~<• j; its
i !S~`'*7Li!'•~f YIJJ t f / / 1 ''IMW.g'd?•i~/
PK1
rR liar f1
P'K
ZONING
P' Oho PD PD (Planned Development)
PD.. A 1 r = c~ r;
YAM. 11 I
.r'.1 I 1
111 1
OWN A A -7A
A9A ter:
R-7. R
CPO GB ~ ~I 0
I~ l o•lu A
ua. I•
RB fR P PF Na
PF
Pf Nu I • /
~ I 0.111
1 ~ i.
PF 0.1
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ti: ca
~t . L9 I o
CPD (Commercial Planned PF 0.111
Development)
~csc P .
0.1v ' CP / IPf 0'1
Nu L8 G ( t
Ntl N8 ,
Lb \ + L6
0•ui L!1
P o•1 r_I • . r-... __j
EXHIBIT B: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(SKETCH PLAN)
011e~ .iur ,.~,r,. •
SiTZ 2
F 27 0 9=
000000 0 0 004n.2.111; x-
wmm=IN s-
EXfiIBIT C: USES
Zito it .99 acres 4,500 sq. ft. Class I restaurant
Site 2: 9.87 acres 86,600 sq. ft. retail strip center
Site 3: .94 acres 6,000 sq. ft. retail building
Site 4: .93 acres 4,800 sq. ft. bank
Mat: internal road right-of-way not included in area)
F?IGI1\1AL
PROPOSAL
T s F" y Z f
i! V s J= 1 r Isi i I y
ll JJ si Y -a lift
s_ a W u v v its 91 "III
Y 7 ?
= a 4$I; .
" f pia Y ~ ~
1177
--1_
T rr ! !
V 1. U. I I 1111i I 11, I I =f
IM- 177 i 1111 11111 ' nil 111M.11 191
~I II.; I I -~ildi ?1111 II 1I1111111,I J
I!I ' If- VII 11111111 dill, i=Jl 'I I
L 11, 1!1?11!I f~f?1 ,
1 I 3 s 1MO IIII IT11=
i a R. f'tlllllll!I!!IIIIII = ~
IIfIIIIt111111L1111
I 1 I~- 1iLIIIIIIIIIIIIiih~
Irrlllllll !1•!!II ~
L iilllll IIII;,I,~
i. I ~~_I I•T~'~1~~ I V I I I I'.' i I;e~11i
! ~ 111 1-c;i I 1 1 1 111 1 1 1;~+ t
. ~ I. 2
a0 1 ~I
W~' 7 j
F- z
li WW fRi 11 t
A
A3>ru IC W< s;j ~Illlif I~
d W J I I I I I I(
II s
lit
r I
• ~ ! II?I
^ «1~0 ~1 Jlq l i e
1f.ai
CD
111117M M 1 14 I I
1 . 1
I i l l l I I ~ I 11. I '~1`~~ ~
` ~I
1 I I!
: I 1 -
I 1
11 I 1 f
r I 1111 I
I I ,
w HOPE,(
Z
s PARK CENTER
e/1 EAGAN. MINNESOTA
- 5-k
- ? - - - FEDERAL LAND
- _ - - - - - COMPANY.
PREUMINARY
wMYrrM r ~.r.r A~
1111 !
IIL- i11L- SerlA,M~r
cm Plow
QQ i i ~ j I •
W~ O 3z ':ii +I
W
V 3 <Z as=`~ I I
91C ic
0 w o z
4 W 31Ht ~J I I I I I I I I E I I
- =i
Illy
I - ~ - II I.I !Ii. '
III} I I! I ' M7
!~I 4HIUr I 1111 I
I I I I I fill i 111111 II
W711! ! I
~ I I I I! III I
qttl III! HIM
t I I III iIl II I
I!IIIIIIIII I
;4 a I II II II
•
cis as I ii. il!iil
II III i I
I IIII 11
0
111MIMM U111
„ I; tilt ; q
r~,.. h lit,
1 i
l11 :6r. %1I M 2441 1 1, S _ II K 1
\.I$ I'.a.l]11 KII~N+~IW W,1M!' /'1X]11 NRNk I.r IN lAW 1YY-(<1MiN •l
• 111 ? , II, ~`?P11Ni SIIwlIS--.
II 51(7JAf 7 ~If7JAf 1 xur -ky Nru.t 0.1.t...II
Mi k! I ( 1 - ' , NISIYRAN - ,ln NNrq., 6u'.
1 1- i 1 ?A f.r wr w.w n...~
'9 Mw.r+l.+ rv Nwl
1 -1X111 RNNR M/N (_YIfYY-1'(11"It Lt IN CANOPY
w. -C(1Pr(R---~ , ` -IIf)I1 MK71 , IIU *4 lip 51(]JMIJ ?.u1N.7w
y'pul •'--IIMa SINK PR11N. wt W SIp111R(NI ` \ \ / La /u lqt
MIN, MW SI(RIfRINI- 919 MI(X 1711N ttW SIl Ri1R(Ni
SOI/iH EI FATKW
V r° PARK CENTER
EAGAN. MINNESOTA
a517Wt9RNlK--- I.rW (N.IVY .(N•ISR
1 - • +h - ==_s - _ ills
`I I 1 RISWRANII - -
• -1X]11 MRNK
yY.Rll l.~mM -'11ft 1RXx
-WI(IN. M I.Y $N7RIIR(7N1
EAST EI MTION
V N••1~ •
FEDERAL LAND
/-lips COMPANY
4fl$ NrX]IS-~ //-/Na1NRNx . ELEVATIONS
IN]IIRMR - /
11(Rt1NNx-- -
.rwvKSx1INNRS- u+xIRRNx CITYSUBMTTAI
F vN 111 / 111 t1 \11 1I IIRN R
NOR7111 If V %T"
X•. - •uw~. rr w.l r.. ~.?+rrr
I.t IV /1'17A: \YIINI VNNIIS~ M W p1PN1: - _
1w III N•.1 I --1X!11 fRNR _ .
Will, rtt INN k
IV VM~III IMw M\ I
I V., LIP IU MSl, I* NP. • JIQ r-I
V A%1 II I I V_NIII 1N e.•~ta rS .s:IN 111 v
I. N•.rI pq 101-11
1
S t
y 7u'rY is a a o v.'.
• I •J
d" ~ s'2r
r I I I _
4! a 4 ; i dell
taa I I j Y f .-L i ist;
67-
_...4!^_•, ww~ ~~v=;.'.• .l = `:~dN-r' If •f M. S. / 1 - iYi
tN~,i 1"i~ ~..:~:.4a4 -:e .;aJ _ _~~„`-r~.-s~zc__. 4' .
1I fem./N. N
. N
I \ I ~ N
J.y
II
•i ii
Yp i~~~~~a{~. ~wt
f2 :i °L'C.~'. LA of
Asa !I:5•'•a-t; 2 .h!_~_
O f i 1 ~~~:V i~i•Y•:
a a x saw?f-':F -:•:2
SHEA
e. tt Sq Sae. 3
100 North S41e Slael
I opofs. MN 55401
iM 16121!19-2251
.¦.e..s.llr (812) 349-2930 F..
~1 MPOR_A, _IAf1ON _ 1- • ; 1 1¦wsnva¦laulpl
ft swr q^••s wr.wwnaow ( 1 1 OWNI R
""bn: , _ t TCF BANK
rROOrOrrALWa- g-- ( - --~f - - 17
wr. u+»uwe ns. .w.s.r ].p-
a'rw.sr¦7`+v ~w~s s .s_o .?s w_~ _ It 11 1, 11 / _ ~
7-- 11 - Ir-•~(-` 1 r
11 1 1 r t
I\ anowvn Ilul
1 I / 1
giIr9so rr. rc , 1 ,_L.f t~ltctltcI Inll
TCF
F, 1 w 1 p~ EAGAN• 6111
f Ord ( "n.-s.-w Sl It (1 1IAAQ
' ae• / SIFE
1_, 1
MAN
_ , w Ip~'~ - 1 I
/,mss I
L OtOrl.
wrr.rvrrti..s..
i. w.rl ww~.. r ~ r rr•
MO ¦•Oi~M.Y.r
N.O.M<. rrY. Y r .
pal r r.Ye.
1fNl: ~-00
Wl sr.Y
roar .o. ..am
%M PL41
lot
1IICIITIICTII
NA91 Al • 1
8HEA
11.111••, Ju,1
IINI \u11h i,~lh So
t u.'.p•d1.. W.
_
1... .....a.•a.., 1• LI) VG ,ru s, !11.w - $017 , _ 1n#..1•• I
.c...e 5 A17 Y~dI``=1 3F'rJ till, F.If
P"~ 6' I I TrF' HANK
I tti+ . al>
I 17J5 QCs 1 TIF
I: b 4 M5 f.::1(::IN. MN
II-II1 I,
1 4 21 J5
sov 1 ~`c3~J~it' son ; I
1 50D I I ,111:r:r N1UF:
PLANTING
MAN
ramp 23.
SUN
1l ~,Y YY Arrr
•wr.~r~uool,•
Yn Y.~rwr, r.o~
.~.nr.~io MI Irrrr
0.16 .o
KW o v
o.l• aw.w
SEE SITE PLAN FOR calrECr CM cut 10cnrla?r AND Mawr alL
A I t I I TT T t T
0 61
SHEA
MYU.a S.Iw<.. Sw1.
IW N.,,h bIith St.
341 nl.r.p11.. MN 35,
~
44:21 M-7251
Fes
It alaar q'w
OWNER
1aa«•a..n..a.... 4 - I 1 ~ ~~I ~ (I - - I - ~ TCF BANK
I ( I'
1° S i
I, ~~~I~/ / 11
TCF
% '41 EAGAN. AIN
c
1'~ 1 0 siwi:'r NAME
1 UTILITY
- s 1 PLAN
o' / I I
1 1
I
cmim q1
....wrw ~...r•w
qq Y M..p
Nt. HG 110
YYa •-aP•I
.•n. sww
~ G.w I.a. rm
IM-ITYMAN N.na,..a a...w
SEE STE aro+ FM oDF Mf C t V 8 cut MMKM AM tsrvut „ wo A I C N I T I C T O
M (/(l0 9
n v= 1 - s i ~L i I 1!'
coo
Q7
1! 1
yr
I ~'I i _ '_1 1
- I 1 a + +
cot
~,ul
81
1 I
EAGAN PROMENADE - OPUS CORPORATION
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
June 19, 1995
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION:
1. This development would be responsible for one of the following park
dedication requirements:
a. Accept the 14.62 acres of parkland dedication as shown in the Opus
Promenade proposal.
OR
b. Remove and/or relocate the community retail shops and accept a
parkland dedication of approximately 18 acres.
OR
c. Accept a cash parks dedication.
OR
d. Other
2. This development would be responsible for a cash trails dedication.
3. This development will be responsible for on-site ponding as the primary
measure to mitigate water quality impacts to the development.
4. Any change in the two-cell replacement pond proposed for Pond DP-4 in
the revised site plan dated 5/19/95 be re-evaluated by staff and the
APRNRC.
5. Proposed Pond DP-4.3 shall be constructed using a two-cell design having
a similar total wet volume as shown on the revised site-plan dated 5/19/95
and the configuration of the pond is to be more irregular to create the
appearance of a more natural pond.
6. Ponds DP-6 and DP-5.1 shall be excavated per water Tesources staff
direction to fully meet water quality treatment requirements for the
residential portion of the site.
7. The developer shall install a retaining wall to eliminate fill into the wetland
fringe adjacent to Pond DP-6.1.
8. The developer shall leave a natural buffer extending 30 feet back from the
normal water level of Pond DP-6.1 within which no grading will occur and
natural vegetation will be maintained. The limits of the buffer will be
marked on the grading plan and marked with permanent monuments in the
field prior to grading. The developer will contact water resources staff at
least 5 days prior to the start of grading for approval of the monument type
and location.
9. The developer shall install a retaining wall just south of residential building
5 to eliminate the need for grading within the buffer adjacent to Pond DP-
6.1.
10. The APRNRC and staff shall review and develop a recommendation on
whether to recommend to the City Council approval of the wetland
replacement plan once a complete plan has been submitted and the 30 day
public comment period is over.
11. The total tree removal of 43.7% is less than allowable removal for total site
development, however the proposed Tree Preservation Plan should be
reconsidered with some re-design of building location for the following
reasons:
a. Commercial development (west side) has greatly exceeded the City
of Eagan adopted Tree Preservation Policy allowable tree removal
limit, proposing to remove over 94% of the existing tree resource. A
consideration may be given to incorporating some of the existing
tree mass into the parking lot area.
b. Re-design or relocation of Building 4 (east residential site) should be
considered to preserve additional specimen trees.
c. An alternative design would be to locate the-44 units of Building 4
onto adjacent building sites, such as Building 3 and Building 5 and
then re-design the parking lots and entrance road area to preserve
additional trees in the Building 4 parking lot•area.
d. The re-design of Building 4 should be possible without reducing the
total number of units within the residential development proposal.
city of eagan MEMO
MEMO TO: Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Members
FROM: Community Development Staff
Parks and Recreation Staff
DATE: June 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Eagan Promenade
APRNRC June 19, 1995 Agenda Item
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Opus Corporation is requesting approval of the following items: a Preliminary
Development Plan for Eagan Promenade Planned Development and a Preliminary
Subdivision of 13 lots and 5 outlots on approximately 120 acres located in the northeast
quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and 1-35E in the S 1/2 of Section 10.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The subject property is currently zoned PD (Planned Development). Development of the
property is governed by the O'Neil Property Planned Development Agreement between
the City and the O'Neils, executed on November 20, 1990.
Prior to July 1985, the property was zoned R-4 (Multiple Residential) on the north and A
(Agricultural) on the south. The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designated the
property R-III (Mixed Residential, 6 to 12 units per acre) at that time. In May 1985,
Robert J. and Grace O'Neil applied for a rezoning of the property to PD and a Guide Plan
amendment consistent with the proposed PD. This 1985 PD application proposed a mix
of Multiple Housing, Limited Business, Roadside Business, and Agricultural uses for the
property. On July 16, 1985, the City Council voted three to two to approve the requested
rezoning and Guide Plan amendment. However, because a rezoning requires a 2/3 vote
of the Council, the request was not approved. The O'Neils then contested this decision
in District Court. In settlement of this lawsuit, the City rezoned the property to PD and
approved a Preliminary Development Plan. This Preliminary Development Plan was that
which was submitted with the 1985 application described above.
To further the settlement of this lawsuit, the City and the O'Neils entered into a Settlement
~ll.
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 2
Agreement dated May 4,1988. In this Settlement Agreement, the City acknowledged that
the uses proposed for the property in an amended Preliminary Development Plan are
reasonable. This amended Preliminary Development Plan proposed a mix of Limited
Business, General Business, Limited Industrial and Freeway Development uses for the
site. The Settlement Agreement also provided that the O'Neils would apply to the City
for formal approval of this amended Preliminary Development Plan, and the City Council
would initiate an appropriate Guide Plan amendment consistent with this amended
Preliminary Development Plan.
In January 1989, the O'Neils applied for rezoning of the property in accordance with the
amended Preliminary Development Plan. On October 3,1989, the City Council amended
the Comprehensive Guide Plan to change the land use designation of the property to
CPD (Commercial Planned Development). This amendment was then forwarded to the
Metropolitan Council for its review and approval. The Metropolitan Council approved the
Guide Plan amendment on January 11, 1990, capped by an average daily trip generation
rate of 8,690 and subject to the following stipulations:
1. Peak hour traffic volumes at the Lone Oak Road, Yankee Doodle Road and
Pilot Knob/1-35E interchanges should be monitored in conjunction with the
development/improvements on the O'Neil site.
2. That the City's corridor study for the area between Lexington Avenue and
Pilot Knob Road examine the impacts of existing and proposed land uses
on 1-35E interchanges.
3. That the City and Dakota County continue to work together to ensure that
an adequate network of minor arterials and collectors is available to serve
sub-regional trips generated by the land uses along Yankee Doodle Road.
4. That the City be advised that if land uses within the vicinity of the I-35E
interchanges severely impact the 1-35E mainline capacity, Metropolitan
Council transportation policies would support the metering of on-ramps.
Further changes in the amended Preliminary Development Plan were negotiated between
the City and the O'Neils, yielding a Finalized Preliminary Development Plan, which
contains a mix of Limited Business, Neighborhood Business, Roadside Business,
Community Shopping Center and Limited Industrial uses. This Finalized Preliminary
Development Plan, along with the conditions and standards for which the property can
be developed in accordance with the Finalized Preliminary Development Plan, is set forth
in the O'Neil Property Planned Development Agreement currently in effect for the site.
One of the key conditions in this PD Agreement is that the O'Neils would . . limit
development/improvements upon the Property in such a manner that total Average Daily
3-6
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 3
Trips (ADT) generated from the proposed uses of the Property will not exceed 8,690
vehicle trips per day. . The City agreed to prepare, approve, and implement a
traffic plan for the Yankee Doodle Road corridor" for the purpose of allowing the subject
site to be . . fully developed and generate traffic volumes that would normally be
expected to occur in a development with the land uses illustrated on the Finalized
Preliminary Development Plan". The ADT limit would then be expected to be modified
or eliminated by the Metropolitan Council and MPCA.
(The origin of the ADT cap comes from the traffic analysis prepared by the City's
consultant in September 1989. As noted above, prior to the Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment changing the land use designation to CPD, the site was guided D-III (Mixed
Residential, 6 to 12 units per acre). The 8,690 ADT figure represents the ADT that would
have been generated by development of the site with residential uses at the D-III density.
The traffic analysis indicated that traffic congestion would occur in the long term whether
developed as D-III or as CPD, but the trips, generated by development as CPD (as per
the O'Neil Finalized Preliminary Development Plan) were forecasted to be 55 percent
greater than for D-III. This traffic congestion was expected to impact the metropolitan
transportation system (I-35E ramps). The Metropolitan Council was not likely to approve
a plan amendment that impacted the metropolitan transportation system without roadway
improvements in place. However, the D-III designation was existing and approved by the
Metropolitan Council, and development under the D-III designation was forecasted to
generate 8,690 ADT. As such, the City negotiated with the O'Neils for a cap of 8,690
ADT, and this cap was made a condition of the executed PD Agreement. The
'Metropolitan Council approved the plan amendment, with a cap of 8,690 ADT. Once
needed traffic improvements are programmed and implemented, the ADT cap could be
changed or lifted).
In late 1993, the City authorized its consultant to perform a transportation study of the
Yankee Doodle Road Corridor that would respond not only to the development needs of
the subject site but also to the current level of congestion in the corridor and the many
other vacant parcels in the area.
This transportation study analyzed the impacts of existing, proposed and potential future
development on the transportation system around the Yankee Doodle/1-35E area of
Eagan. Detailed traffic counts were taken at major intersections along the corridor
including peak hour turning movements by major vehicle classifications. This information
provided the baseline data to evaluate the existing roadway system and its current Level
of Service (LOS) and capacity utilization during crucial peak hour periods. A detailed
analysis of existing undeveloped properties in a roughly five square mile area around the
Yankee Doodle/1-35E intersection was then performed to calculate the amount of
additional traffic generated by their ultimate development. Various increments of
operational and geometric improvements to the existing thoroughfare system were then
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 4
evaluated for increased capacity and compared to various scenarios of development
timetables and intensities. This study performed nine such scenarios, thereby identifying
the ultimate maximum transportation improvements needed. The identified improvements
consist of a roadway network around the Yankee Doodle/Pilot Knob/1-35E intersection,
with two bridge crossings over I-35E, new local routes to serve as relievers to Yankee
Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads, widening of Yankee Doodle Road, and reconfigured
access to I-35E.
In order to implement the identified improvements, an amendment to the Transportation
Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan incorporating the improvements was prepared and
approved by the City Council on May 15, 1995. This plan amendment is currently being
reviewed by the Metropolitan Council.
Also, the subject site is part of the newly established Central Area. The Central Area,
part of the Commercial Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan, encompasses
the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road/1-35E intersection. The City, in
reviewing commercial land use, determined that an update of the Commercial Land Use
Plan was needed to clarify its vision for commercial development into the future. Four
new commercial land use categories, one of which is Central Area, have been adopted
for use in guiding commercial development. One of the reasons for undertaking a review
of commercial development in Eagan was a desire identified by the City Council to create
a central focal area with a concentration of mixed uses as one way to strengthen the
sense of community and identity. During the series of workshop meetings held with the
Council and City advisory commissions on the Commercial Land Use Study, the area
around the Yankee Doodle Road/1-35E intersection was identified as the appropriate
location for this district.
In the summer of 1994, the City Council focused in on the northeast quadrant of this
intersection because it contains the largest area of vacant land in the district. The Council
undertook a visioning process for the northeast quadrant. To get a broader perspective
of this idea of creating a community focal area for Eagan, in December 1994 the City
Council established the Central Area Task Force, the membership of which included a
cross-section of the community representing the City's advisory commissions, businesses
and residents at large as well as two Council members. The Task Force developed a
Central Area vision by identifying the key land use elements needed to create a
community focal area.
Building on the overall review of commercial land uses and City Council/Central Area
Task Force visioning, goals and policies were developed to create a Central Area Plan
for use in guiding future development and redevelopment within this commercial district.
An amendment to the Commercial Land Use Plan incorporating the Central Area Plan
was prepared and approved by the City Council on May 15, 1995. This plan amendment
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 5
is currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject property has never been developed and over the years has been used
primarily for agricultural purposes. A house and barn are located in the center (east-west)
of the site, towards the north side. The west half of the site is primarily open with the
exception of an oak woodlands area in the south central part of the site. The east quarter
of the site is completely wooded with rolling to steep terrain, and includes several ponds
and wetlands.
In the last 18 months, the west part of the site was used as a drop point for excess
materials that were hauled to the site from nearby road construction. As a result, a
majority of the west half of the site is relatively flat. The average elevation of the site is
900 feet above sea level.
Surrounding uses are as follows:
North: vacant; zoned I-1; designated Central Area (note: the owners of this
±60 acre site have indicated an interest in developing the area with
residential uses)
South: Town Centre commercial area; zoned CSC and PD; designated
Central Area
East: single-family residential and vacant; zoned A and I-1; designated
Central Area and IND
West: i-35E
PROPOSAL
Opus Corporation is proposing a mixed-use development on 120 acres of land, often
referred to as the O'Neil Property, located in the northeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle
Road and I-35E. The mix of uses proposed for this development include commercial,
residential, and public uses. Healey Ramme Company is developing the residential
component of the project
The site will be served by two public north-south roads, providing a connection from
Yankee Doodle Road to a new public east-west collector road that connects to Lexington
Avenue. The western north-south road lines up with and is essentially an extension of
Denmark Avenue. The eastern north-south road, to be called Promenade Avenue, lines
up with the driveway access to Blue Cross/Blue Shield's Waterview Office building.
All of the commercial component and the community retail area will be developed in one
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 6
phase by Opus Corporation. Healey Ramme Company also intends to construct the
residential component in one phase.
Commercial: The primary commercial component consists of approximately 320,000
square feet of in-line strip retail and approximately 70,100 square feet of freestanding
commercial businesses. The breakdown of this square footage is as follows:
Strip Center: 59,000 square foot "upscale" grocery (with off-sale liquor)
53,000 square foot home furnishing retailer
34,000 square foot discount apparel retailer
32,000 square foot office supply retailer
30,000 square foot pet food supply retailer
35,000 square foot electronics retailer
77,000 square foot national department store
Freestanding: 25,000 square foot national book retailer
8,500 square foot bank (with drive-up window)
6,000 square foot video retailer
four 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurants (possibly with on-
sale liquor
4,000 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive thru)
2,600 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive thru)
This commercial component is located on the western part of the site between Denmark
and Promenade Avenues, with the strip center located parallel to and approximately 900
feet north of Yankee Doodle Road. The total linear length of the strip center is
approximately 1,500 feet. The freestanding commercial businesses are located south of
the strip center adjacent to either Yankee Doodle Road, Denmark Avenue or Promenade
Avenue. The four sit-down restaurants are clustered around a man-made pond adjacent
to Yankee Doodle Road.
Parking to serve this commercial component consists of 2,417 stalls located primarily
between the strip center and freestanding commercial businesses. Three hundred fifty-
four of the total parking stalls (those located in front of the grocery store) are at 9 1/2 foot
widths, with the remaining stalls at 9 foot widths. Landscaped islands are shown at
various locations throughout the parking lot. Through-movement from Promenade Avenue
to Denmark Avenue is provided by a drive aisle directly in front of the strip center and by
a drive aisle approximately half way between the strip center and Yankee Doodle Road.
A bus shelter is located on the island on the north side of this center drive aisle.
A second commercial area is located on the east side of Promenade Avenue. This
commercial area consists of a 20,000 square foot building intended for several small retail
91
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 7
tenants. A 102-stall (9 foot widths) parking lot is located in front, between the building
and Promenade Avenue.
The architecture for all commercial buildings will reflect similar design elements. Building
exterior materials will include brick, metal, and integrally colored EIFS (Engineered
Insulation Finish System (e.g. Dryvit)).
Other architectural features of the site include four entry monuments and a clock tower.
The entry monuments will be located on both the east and west sides of Promenade
Avenue at Yankee Doodle Road and at the northern crosswalk connecting the commercial
and public components. The entry monuments are square brick structures with metal
work approximately 50 feet high. A 14 foot high metal canopy extends from each
monument. The project name-Eagan Promenade-will be located on the canopy in
backlit individual channel letters. The brick and metal clock tower is approximately 50 feet
high and is located adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road in the center of the sit-down
restaurant cluster.
Signage for the commercial area includes wall mounted business signs for individual
tenants and four pylon signs. The wall mounted business signs will be backlit individual
channel letters, and will not exceed 20 percent of the building facade with one sign per
major street frontage per business. The brick and metal pylon signs will be 30 feet high
by 12 feet wide with backlit translucent sign panels for individual tenant names. Total
sign area for each pylon sign is 192 square feet per side. In addition, the clock tower will
include backlit translucent sign panels for the sit-down restaurant names.
Typical commercial lighting fixtures on 35 foot poles are provided throughout the parking
area and along the service drive behind the strip center. Decorative light fixtures will be
installed along the front sidewalk area in front of the retail building. The submittal
indicates that lighting in public rights-of way (i.e. lighting along Denmark and Promenade
Avenues and Yankee Doodle Road) will not be provided by the developer.
Residential: The residential component is located on the eastern part of the site and
consists of 294 apartment units in five buildings for a gross density of 12.54 units per
acre. Unit mix is as follows:
9 studio units
43 one bedroom units
26 two bedroom units
112 two bedroom townhome units
104 three bedroom townhome units
The building design provides for individual exterior entrances for each unit, a center
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 8
courtyard with each building, and underground garages. The buildings are oriented on
the site to take up grade changes (with the buildings acting as retaining walls) so that the
buildings are either two or three stories above grade, depending on the side of the
building. A clubhouse and outdoor swimming pool for residents is also included in the site
plan. Residential building exteriors will be of low maintenance lap siding.
Vehicular access to the residential component is via a private street, with one access
point to the public east-west collector road on the north side of the site. Pedestrian
access within the site is provided by sidewalks to the exterior doors of all units. A
walkway is also provided connecting this component to the Village Green in the public
component.
A total of 589 parking stalls, at 9 foot widths, are provided for the residential component.
Of this total, 369 stalls are underground, 64 stalls are in detached covered garages, 131
stalls are surface spaces, and 25 stalls are shown as proof-of-parking.
Four signs-one at the site entrance, one adjacent to Building 2, one at the corner of
Lexington and Yankee Doodle, and one on Yankee Doodle-are provided for the
residential component. These signs are 5 feet high by 10 feet wide, and are to be
constructed of oversize brick and painted wood.
Driveway and parking lighting and fixtures will be coordinated with the commercial and
public components. Fixtures will be installed on a 14 foot pole at a spacing of 100 feet.
Recessed soffit lighting or globe lighting will be provided at each unit entry illuminating
patios and sidewalks. Additional sidewalk lighting will be provided by fixtures mounted
on three foot poles directing light only on the walking surface. Garage door lighting will
be directed only to the building surface and driveway below.
Public: The public component is located between the primary commercial component
and residential component on the east side of Promenade Avenue. The developer is
providing 14.62 acres of land as park dedication to the City for this public component.
The developer has also shown on the site plan where a future community center, outdoor
plaza, Village Green and parking area could potentially be located on this land. Any
development within the public component would be the responsibility of the City.
The 20,000 square foot strip center intended for small retail tenants is also located on the
east side of Promenade Avenue, as noted above. Essentially, the public component
wraps around this commercial component in a "U" shape.
APRNRC ISSUES
Park Land: The developer is providing 14.62 acres of land as park dedication. Although
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 9
the quantity of land generally meets the commercial park land dedication standards, the
quality (i.e. usability) of this land is an issue. Adequate usable space for large community
events is not provided because much of the southern part of the park land is heavily
wooded and contains steep slopes, and because the location of the community shops
occupies 3-plus acres of potentially suitable land for active park use.
Options for consideration include:
a) accepting the park land dedication as shown; smaller-scale public facilities
and community events could be programmed for the area;
b) removing and/or relocating the community retail shops for a park land
dedication of approximately 18 acres; larger-scale public facilities and
community events could be programmed for the area; or
c) requiring total cash dedication and no land for parks dedication; cash could
be used to acquire land elsewhere for large-scale public facilities and
community events.
Water Quality: The development site encompasses four water bodies identified in the
Eagan water quality management plan. The southern portion of one of these-Pond DP-
6.1 located in the eastern portion of the site-is classified for wildlife habitat and is the only
recreational-classified water body within the proposed development. While the pond is
shallow (maximum depth of 1.5 feet), it has not yet been incorporated into the storm
sewer system and is therefore relatively pristine. The wetland complex associated with
this pond together with the surrounding 'undisturbed upland woodlands are a significant
natural feature of the site. The other classified water bodies on the site are all designated
for treatment purposes and have been used for some time for stormwater management.
The site will generate stormwater that eventually reaches LeMay Lake, one of six Class
I direct contact recreation water bodies in the City. Because of the large size of the
development, the high impervious coverage, and the existence of a Class I water body
downstream, staff recommends that on-site ponding be used as the primary measure to
mitigate water quality impacts of the development.
The developer is proposing to fill in an existing stormwater basin (Pond DP-4) that
currently treats runoff from Yankee Doodle Road and developments to the south, and
replace that pond with a two-cell pond of at least equal total wet volume. Modeling
indicates that the proposed pond configuration on the revised plans (dated 5/19/95) would
adequately replace the existing pond from a treatment standpoint. However, the new
pond configuration extends into MnDOT right-of-way along Interstate 35E and it is not
clear whether this encroachment will be approved by MnDOT. If approval by MnDOT is
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 10
not issued, any revised ponding configuration will need to be re-evaluated by the City for
adequacy.
Treatment of runoff from the commercial portion of this development will be accomplished
by routing runoff to proposed Pond DP-4.3 in the north-central portion of the site. While
the wet volume of the proposed pond is adequate, a two-cell design must be used instead
of the proposed single cell to rectify some design problems. In addition, the shoreline
configuration of the basin should be more irregular to create the appearance of a more
natural pond.
The developer proposes to discharge stormwater runoff from about.7 acres of impervious
area in the eastern residential portion of the site to Pond DP-6 which discharges in turn
to Pond DP-6.1, a classified wildlife habitat water body. To adequately mitigate impacts
to Pond DP-6.1, .4 acre-feet of sediment should be removed via excavation from Pond
DP-6 near the storm sewer discharge point. The developer proposes to discharge runoff
from the remaining residential area to a proposed dry pond designated Pond DP-5.1.
However, staff recommends that this pond be constructed as a wet pond (surface area
and wet volume of .3 acres and .9 acre-feet, respectively, at the normal water level) to
satisfy water quality mitigation requirements for this portion of the development.
Wetlands: There are 5.65 acres of jurisdictional wetlands in 7 basins within the
development site. The current development plan would result in the filling of .51 acres
of wetland and establishment of replacement wetlands in the north central portion of the
site.
The developer has been requested to install a retaining wall to eliminate filling of a portion
of the fringe wetland adjacent Pond DP-6.1. The developer has also been requested to
install another retaining wall just south of residential building 5 to eliminate the need for
grading within 30 feet of the normal water level for Pond DP-6.1. Finally, an ungraded
buffer of natural, un-maintained vegetation extending back 30 feet from the normal water
level of Pond DP-6.1 should be reflected on the grading plan. While the developer
reacted favorably to these recommendations, staff have not yet received revised plans
showing these changes.
A complete wetland replacement plan application has not yet been submitted to the City
by the developer. While the wetland impact proposed seems reasonable for a project of
this scope, a recommendation on the replacement plan should be postponed until after
a complete replacement plan suitable for the mandatory public noticing has been
submitted and public comments received and evaluated.
Regarding water quality and wetlands, staff recommends that:
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 11
a. the water quality mitigation requirements for this development be met with on-site
ponding.
b. any change in the two-cell replacement pond proposed for Pond DP-4 in the
revised site plan dated 5/19/95 be re-evaluated by staff and the APRNRC.
c. proposed pond DP-4.3 be constructed using a two-cell design having a similar
total wet volume as shown on the revised site plan dated 5/19/95, and that the
configuration of the pond be more irregular to create the appearance of a more
natural pond.
d. ponds DP-6 and DP-5.1 be excavated as per water resources staff direction to fully
meet water quality treatment requirements for the residential portion of the site.
e. the developer install a retaining wall to eliminate fill into the wetland fringe adjacent
to Pond DP-6.1.
f. the developer leave a natural buffer extending 30-feet back from the normal water
level of Pond DP-6.1 within which no grading will occur and natural vegetation will
be maintained. The limits of the buffer will be marked on the grading plan and
marked with permanent monuments in the field prior to grading. The developer will
contact water resources staff at least 5 days prior to the start of grading for
approval of the monument type and location.
g. the developer install a retaining wall just south of residential building 5 to eliminate
the need for grading within the buffer adjacent to Pond DP-6.1.
h. the APRNRC and staff review and develop a recommendation on whether to
recommend to the City Council approval of the wetland replacement plan once a
complete plan has been submitted and the 30-day public comment period is over.
Tree Preservation: The west half of the site is. open with the exception of 50,000 square
foot woodlands in the south central part of the site (comprised mostly of oak trees, up to
20" diameter), and a scattering of mixed deciduous trees located around the existing
abandoned farmhouse and out buildings. This west half of the site is relatively flat with
a considerable amount of fill having been added during the last two years.
The east half of the site is completely wooded over the rolling terrain and includes several
ponds, wetlands and water bodies. Tree species composition on this east half includes
mostly oaks (8" to 48" diameter), black cherry, aspen, elm, cottonwood, birch, and cedar.
Most of the larger oaks and cedars are concentrated in higher elevation areas (ridge tops
and bluff lines) while the lower slopes and wetland edges are vegetated with elm,
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 12
cottonwood and other lowland species. There are several areas throughout this east half
of the property which include heavy concentrations of "specimen oaks", diameters larger
than 30". These areas should receive special attention and design layouts.
An original and a revised Tree Preservation Plan have been submitted for staff review.
The most current revised plan indicates the existence of 1,072 significant trees over the
entire site. Thirty-six hardwood deciduous trees (mostly oaks) are classified as specimen
trees, and dozens of oak trees in the 20" - 30" diameter range. Significant tree removal
is summarized below by commercial development property (west side) and residential
development property (east side). If development occurs as proposed, 468 significant
trees (43.7% of the total) will be removed. Eleven specimen trees (30.6%) will be
removed.
Commercial Development-West Site Residential Development-East Site
247 Existing Significant Trees 825 Existing Significant Trees
233 Significant Trees to be Removed 235 Significant Trees to be Removed
(94.3% of Total 247) (28.5% of Total 825)
14 Significant Trees Preserved 590 Significant Trees Preserved
(5.7% of Total 247) (71.5% of Total 825)
The developer has proposed grading the entire area to be developed at one time. The
Tree Preservation Policy was originally set up to deal with development on a two-phase
-process. The first phase would include initial site grading and installation of utilities.
During this phase, 25% of the existing significant vegetation is allowed to be removed
without mitigation. The second phase would include development of individual lots. A
30% removal of the remaining significant tree/woodland resource is allowed during this
phase without mitigation. Staff is recommending tree preservation issues of this particular
development be considered in an entire site phase, with all the tree preservation/removal
matters be considered at the time of initial development. Allowable tree removal when
considered in one phase calculates to 47.5% of the existing vegetation. Therefore,
allowable significant tree removal calculates to 509 trees. No tree/woodland removal will
be allowed after this initial development.
Because the total tree removal of 43.7% is less than allowable removal for total site
development, there is no mitigation. However, staff recommends that the proposed
development Tree Preservation Plan be reconsidered and that some re-design of building
location be considered for the following reasons:
1. The commercial development area (west side) has greatly exceeded the
City of Eagan adopted Tree Preservation Policy allowable tree removal limit,
proposing to remove over 94% of the existing tree resource. One solution
APRNRC Report - Eagan Promenade
June 19, 1995
Page 13
may be to incorporate some of the existing tree mass into the parking lot
area.
2. A re-design or relocation of Building 4 (east residential site) should be
considered to preserve additional specimen trees. The construction of this
building as proposed will result in the removal of the following trees:
Tree # Diameter Species
15172 48" Oak
15179 36" Oak
15174 36" Oak
15185 36" Oak
15176 28" Oak
15177 28" Oak
15180 24" Oak
15178 21" Oak
15184 21" Oak
* Field inspection has resulted in the presence of at least two additional
trees in the area of Building 4 that will be removed according to the
proposed plan (28" Oak and 26" Elm).
An alternative design would be to locate the 44 units of Building 4 onto adjacent
building sites, such as Building 3 and Building 5, and then re-design the parking
lots and entrance road area to preserve the following additional trees which are
located in the Building 4 parking lot area:
Tree # Diameter Species
10125 34" Oak
15165 32" Oak
Staff feels the re-design of Building 4 should be possible without reducing the total
number of units within the residential development proposal.
SUMMARY
Opus Corporation has proposed a mixed use development with several issues for
consideration by the APRNRC, the primary issue being whether a land or cash dedication
is most appropriate. Issues regarding water quality/wetlands and tree preservation can
be addressed through staff recommendations as contained in this memorandum.
4l.
MEMO
LL _ city of eagan
DATE: JUNE 15, 1995
TO: CENTRAL AREA TASK FORCE
FROM: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROMENADE DEVELOPMENT
The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission met on June 13 to
review the Promenade Development as it pertains to parks dedication issues. After a
review of the site by staff and Opus, the Commission identified benefits and concerns
they felt would impact the use of this site as a "city center".
The Commission, following their analysis, suggested that the 14 acre site, which would
be acquired through parks dedication, could be used as a "city center" based on the
following:
• The limited developable space (approximately 4 acres) would preclude large
community events such as 4th of July with carnival, parade and fireworks.
• The majority of the site is heavily vegetated with wetlands and steep slopes and
could provide for a more passive park use such as trails, satellite picnic areas,
etc.
• The Village Green area can provide a maximum of 100, 10'x15' booths for events
such as arts/crafts fairs. If the City wishes to accommodate a larger event, this
space may not be adequate, however, the City may wish to focus on providing
smaller events that occur more often in this space. This may not provide the
"critical" mass necessary to have a successful event which would attract the
community to participate
• In accommodating the public for outdoor concerts, a maximum of 408 people
(based on 6'x4' per person) can comfortably be seated on the lawn. This again
would work well for small events but may not be adequate for larger community
events. The Village Green is not accessible to vehicles for equipment set-up such
as stage, special lighting, seating, etc.
• The area shown for a community center will accommodate a 30,000 square foot
building that can provide facilities such as gymnasium, community room,
conference rooms, kitchen and dining area. If an indoor pool is to be Included as
a component, consideration should be given to providing a larger site to
accommodate the space needs. Consideration should be given as to what specific
facilities should be included within a community center, if it is to be located at this
site, and how it will be financed.
• Development costs for the plaza and Village Green will be verh high compared to
"traditional" parks.
• The close relationship to a "power retail space" was not perceived as a benefit.
The Commission also suggested other opportunites that may be offered on this site
based on the following:
• Consideration may be given to adding the 4 acres where the small shops are
currently shown east of Promenade Avenue. This would increase the park size to
approximately 18 acres, however the space would remain relatively lineal with
steep slopes, vegetation and wetlands. It may offer only limited additional
recreational development adjacent to this commercial area.
• If the emphasis for this site continues to be to accommodate large community
events that may draw people from throughout the Twin Cities area, consideration
may be given to purchasing the entire parcel of land east of Promenade Avenue
for $900,000 with the expectation that this area will develop at a later date. A
master plan for this entire parcel would be important if the City is going to develop
the site in phases or all at once. The identification for funding for the acquisition
and development of this approximate 38 acre site, along with operational costs of
the facilities that would be identified on this site would be required as well. A
parcel of this size may then be more appropriatly found at another location. An
alternative site would probably better meet the needs for a "downtown park" for
community events as identified by the Task Force. A cash dedication of nearly
$500,000 could be the source of acquiring such a park.
KV:cm
c4/downtwn. N
4.
EAGAN PROMENADE - OPUS
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Review
Department Staff Analysis
June 13, 1995
This memo will not review the development proposed, as it's assumed that everyone
is sufficiently familiar or can quickly grasp the development plan. Further, the Natural
Resources Sub-Committee has reviewed the plan for compliance with existing regulation
for wetlands, water quality and forestry. Therefore, other then some adjustment that will
enhance tree preservation, this memo will concentrate on issues associated with the
proposed park plan. The Commission has essentially four alternatives to review and to
base a recommendation.
The four alternatives are as follows: A) Accept the proposed park land dedication as
being appropriate for the programs anticipated. The parcel is approximately 14.62 acres
in size and is identified as Outlot A. B) Acquire all of Outlot A and Lot 1 for park.
(Proposed park and the proposed small retail shops). This increases the park to
approximately 18 acres in size. C) Acquire the entire area east of Promenade, including
the proposal residential area for parks/open space which is approximately 42 acres in
size. This would mean a required park land dedication from the commercial sector of
the development as well as the purchase of the remainder of the property by the City. D)
Require a cash park and cash trails dedication, rather than any land.
Park Land Analysis
The existing proposal would provide 14.62 gross acres of park land. The park is
lineal in shape and borders Promenade Ave to the west extending from Yankee Doodle
Road north to a street identified as Denmark Avenue. The south portion of the park
property has an extensive growth of mature oak and other hard wood. Disregarding the
area occupied by the small retail shops, the middle one third of the site has a varied
terrain with slopes increasing from less than 10%, to slopes in the 20%. These slopes
increase to 30% as one moves from west to east. The highest degree of slope occurs
near the pond which helps to define the east property edge. The north one-third of the
park has less severe slopes--generally in the 5% range. The park narrows considerably to
approximately 175 feet before increasing in width as the park terminates at Denmark.
A breakdown of the slope analysis reveals the following:
2.56 acre is in slopes 5% or less
4.86 acre 5-10%
6.63 acre 10-20%
3.91 acre 20-30%
.35 acre 30% or greater
.71 acre is water surface
(Note: This analysis includes the small shop area)
Although the outlot is 14.62 acres in size, the City would not give full credit for this
size parcel, because of the excess amount of steep slopes and pond. No calculations
have been completed to determine the exact amount of credit to be applied. "Useable"
acreage is from 6-8 acres in size.
The proposed park also anticipates the development of a surfaced plaza and village
green. The plaza is approximately 15,000 - 18,000 sq ft and the village green 36.000 -
40.000 sq ft. A foot print of approximately 35,000 sq ft is shown for a future community
center.
Reviewing the proposed grades for this development reveals a series of steps
between the plaza and village green with a grade differential of 10 feet. This grade
differential will affect the height of the exterior wall of any future community center.
The village green has a very manageable slope of 1 1/2 % from west to east.
Construction of this will require fill material to be put in place. Because of some of the
existing slopes, the amount of fill required will range from as little as one foot to as much
as 20 feet.
As shown, the village green may not meet some A.D.A. accessibility requirements
for slopes, which appear to be greater than 5%.
Additional Background
The developer is not funding the construction of the plaza, village green, community
center or parking to the north. Staff has completed, based only on a limited amount of
discussion and direction, a very preliminary cost projection for the plaza/village green.
That project places development costs at between 400,000 and 600,000. This number
may be enlarged if special treatments, lighting and sound systems are considered for
future programs. Funding for construction, as well as for intensive event programming,
should be considered (as should intensive maintenance).
Staff has done two layouts of space to help to reflect the space useability. One
shows an "exhibit" layout which reflects approximately 100 booths for display, such as an
arts festival. A "performance" layout, suitable for a speaker, musical group or stage
performance is also done. This shows 408 spaces which are 6x4 in size. This also
allows for 4 foot walk aisle. You will note that as an amphitheater, the design is in the
opposite direction. Typically, audience seating expands as you move away from the
stage. This is not the case here. With a true amphitheater, the grades are steeper than 1
1/2 % to allow for better visibility. Increasing the grades will conflict with exhibit space
layout. Access to the Village Green for vehicles will need to be resolved. At present
there is no access to the Village Green for equipment vehicles.
Soils in this area very from acceptable to poor. Generally, soils where the parking
and community center shown are acceptable. To the east of the building, by the pond,
and the very south portion of the park are poor.
45.
Review of Alternatives
Presented in discussion format are the four alternatives. Staff, by presenting the
four, is attempting to provide a rational for each as well as the short coming of each
alternatives in an attempt to provoke some discussion.
1) Accept park as proposed. Accepting this park would be a unique opportunity for the
City that would allow space for special events and programs that may not be offered
elsewhere in the park system because of intrusion into adjacent land uses, i.e. sound,
lights, traffic. Although the space is somewhat small, it can work for most events if the
developer, owners, and City can work together to develop, maintain and program the
park site. This park can work well for the development, community and future residents
of the immediate area. Access for vehicles has yet to be determined.
2) Requires additional park land dedication by removing the 20,000 sq ft small shop
commercial area and includes all of this as park. The proposal, as presented, is too small
to be effective to accomplish the objectives of a central park with only about 4 acres and
useable space. The first proposal for parks does not serve the community for other then
programmed events. The casual user on "nonevent" days may find the park seriously
lacking and devoid of features to "use".
By creating a larger formal garden, similar to the Walker Art Park, would be
developed that could enhance the park area and be also suitable for events.
Although the July 4th carnival and fireworks, as is currently know at Rahn Park, will
not fit in either of the first two scenarios, perhaps a much scaled back City festival could
still work in this larger park. A larger park space, with a formal structure to allow formal
use, has the advantage of being attractive to the casual user during nonevent days.
Like the first alternative, funding for development of the park space is unknown at
this time. But for this option, the timing is not as critical as it would be under the first
option. Under the first option, it would seem critical to the success of the small shops
and to the downtown concept to begin development of the park space immediately. This
alternative would place less importance on the timing of the development of the park. In
addition, the community center could wait until such time as funding could be identified.
Alternative 3
Acquire all of the space east of Promenade for park. This would require acquisition
of all the property, including that which is proposed for residential. This alternative
would suggest that natural resource amenities of hills, tress, and ponding be preserved
through the City's acquisition. Parks development would be limited to programs and
opportunities that are less consumptive of this space and have a natural resource theme.
Trails and paths seem more appropriate for this property given the high quality of the
natural resource base. More intensive development could eventually occur east of
Promenade, but this would be an environmental intrusion into the area. A downtown
park at this location is too small, even if the small shops are added to the park.
Clearly, a source of funding to acquire all the remaining land beyond that which is
dedicated would have to be found.
Alternative 4
Require a cash parks dedication for the proposed development. Park dedication, if
all the property were to be developed would amount to $493,800. This includes the 294
residential development now proposed on Block 4. The trail dedication would amount to
an additional $117,100 for a total of approximately $641,800. The rational for this
recommendation could be found in the following arguments. As proposed, the park is
simply inadequate to meet the programs envisioned to become a true downtown central
park area. Despite the wonderful amenities provided by the natural resource east of the
park/village green is inadequate to meet most of the programs envisioned for this space.
Further, there are a number of existing parks, that if enhanced, might be able to better
meet the needs of the community for some of the activities desired. For example,
construction of a permanent stage at Trapp Farm could meet the needs for performance
space that the community wants. Already, there is an amphitheater, there it simply
doesn't have a permanent stage or sound and light system. Last year the summer
Wednesday in the park series had successful events there between four and five hundred
people there for the Teddy Bear Band.
The cash dedication, applied to acquisition/development of other parks, might be a
better approach to meeting City and community needs for program activities. Simply put,
there are equal or better opportunities elsewhere than this proposal located adjacent to a
large commercial developments. Perhaps the City should give consideration to acquiring
the property south of Lay May Lake to create a community park for festivals and events.
Another consideration is the Unysis property which could be acquired for a large
downtown park. This property has good access off of major county roads. Coupled with
a cross-easement for parking, this might serve the community very well.
Compared to many other City parks in the community, there is not a large
residential population to be serviced by this proposed central park on nonevent days.
Why put a significant amount of resources into this location? And finally, the energy
between the community and the park does not seem to be occurring as was hoped for.
The huge retail space makes the park seem very small and out of scale. The relationship
between the park, commercial restaurants has not occurred. The connection between the
park and residential is weak, being separated by steep topography with only a single trail
being the link between the two.
Community Center
The community center as reflected in the plan shows a 35,000 sq ft. building foot
print, with total space, two story of 50,000 ft. In review of this, there has been
discussion that the road right- of-way is not sufficient to meet engineering standards. If
the road right-of-way expands, there could be even less space for the community center.
Given the set back on a two story building, the community center would have to have a
variance to the set backs or move further to the east. It is likely that the foot print would
shrink in size.
49
The community center as depicted without a program. That is, there is nothing that
says what this facility is to be. To some, it's an indoor swimming pool to others it's a
gymnasium and gymnastics facility. To others it's community rooms, a banquet facility or
something entirely different. To determine the adequacies of a 35,000 square foot
facility, there should be a determination of exactly what it is that the community wants in
a center before we can determine the adequacies of this space. In reviewing what other
communities in the metro area have been building for facilities it was found that
Maplewood has recently opened up their community center which is an 80,000 sq ft
facility. The original community center for the City of Eagan, which contained an ice
arena, leisure pool, community room, gymnasium, contained approximately 107,000 sq
ft. The Apple Valley Community Center which consists of gymnasium, teen center, office
space, and meeting room contains approximately 42,000 sq ft. Arden Hills recently
opened up a converted school facility for its community center which measures
approximately 70,000 sq ft. Can 35,000 sq ft. become a community center? The answer
is yes, assuming that the community has a limited architectural pro rg am. A double gym,
with meeting rooms and office space could fit here. But trying to add a swimming pool
or for any other large space item means the building foot print is too small.
cs2/parks.kv
OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN OCP HOMES, INC.
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission
June 1.9, 1995
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION:
1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication based on
single family development..
2. This development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication based on
single family development.
3. The Tree Preservation Plan as submitted is acceptable.
4. The only jurisdictional wetland identified within the development site is the
wetland complex associated with Pond AP-14. No encroachment into; or,,,
drainage of this wetland is proposed for this. development.
5. This development shall be responsible for a cash water quality dedication.
c4/oakpt _
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: June 9, 1995 CASE: 32-RZ--6-5-95
32-PP-6-5-95
32-CP-5-3-95
APPLICANT: OCB Homes Inc. HEARING DATE: June 27, 1995
PROPERTY OWNER: William Soules, PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree
Charles Tatsuda, & Marian Kawakami
REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Planned Development
Amendment, Preliminary Subdivision - OakPointe of Eagan
LOCATION: West of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive and south of Cliff Road in the NW
1/4 of Section 32.
COMPREHENSNE PLAN: LB - Limited Business
ZONING: Planned Development - Limited Business
SUMMARY OF REQUEST OCP Homes, Inc is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment changing 10.30 acres from LB - Limited Business to D-II - Mixed Residential (0-6
units/acre); a Preliminary Planned Development Amendment for 35 zero lot line single family
homes and a, Preliminary Subdivision for 35 lots and four outlots on 10.30 acres located west
of Galaxie Avenue and east of Plaza Drive south of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:"
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage,
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use
contemplated.
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds or similar burden.
1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
1. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake
Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed
with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein
as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public.
Planned Development:
Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination, states: "In considering any petition for such district,
the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose
of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will:
(1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does
development of the underlying zoning district;
(2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed
plans;
(3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying
zoning district."
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 3
BACKGROUNDIHISTORY
Planned Development History: The Galaxie Cliff Plaza Planned Development was initially
approved in September 1988. The planned development contained 25.36 acres and allowed
Limited Business type uses. The first development completed in the Planned Development was
the Burnett Realty office approved in April 1989. Then in October 1990 the Park Nicollet
Medical Center building was approved and later constructed.
The remaining outlots were platted with the first addition, and have remained vacant.
Oakoointe of Eagan History: After reviewing the conceptual development proposal with staff the
developer scheduled a neighborhood meeting which was held on March 7, 1995. Approximately
a dozen neighboring residents attended the meeting. It was common consensus that the proposed
use of the property was more desirable than any type of commercial development. Concerns
raised by those attending the meeting were: 1) ensuring that the development would minimize
tree loss around the pond; 2) taking access on Galaxie Avenue; 3) future development with the
specific lots such as each new homeowner putting up a different style of fence etc...
EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is characterized by existing public right-of-way surrounding
the entire site. The northern portion of the site has steep slopes. The majority of the trees are
located in this area as well as surrounding the pond located in the central portion of the 10.3
acres. The southern portion of the proposed development does not have as severe topography
nor as many trees.
SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan
designations surround the subject property:
North - Burnett Realty and Park Nicollet Medical Center; zoned PD ; designated LB.
South - Single family residences; zoned PD R-1; designated D-I
East - Single family and twin homes; zoned R-2 and R-1; designated D-I
West - Burnett Realty and Health Partners; zoned PD; designated LB.
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Introduction OCP Homes, Inc. is proposing to develop the same type of housing and
neighborhood that was developed in their Oak Cliff Pond first and second phases located south
of Cliff Road on Slater Road in the southwest comer of Eagan. The style of development is a
zero lot line, cluster development with lots that average 9,500 s.f. on private streets. All of the
property owners will belong to a homeowners' association that will provide all of the property
maintenance and landscaping; maintenance for common areas, year round street maintenance and
trash pickup.
The site plan has been designed to accommodate the setbacks required for private streets. The
concept of the design is zero lot line development. Each house is designed to be located
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 4
immediately abutting one side of the side property line. Zero lot line design provides a front
yard, rear yard and one private side yard per lot. The developer has chosen to orient the lots to
maximize southern exposures for either the rear of the home or the "non-zero" (open) side of the
homes. These are the most window intensive areas of the homes.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan Map
indicates the property is guided LB - Limited Business. The developer is requesting a change
from LB to D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 units per acre). The area abutting this property along
the east boundary line is guided D-I Single Family Residential. Changing the Guide Plan to D-II
would offer an acceptable transition to the existing D-I neighborhood.
Planned Development Amendment The overall density is higher than what the R-1 (single
family) zoning district allows, but less than an R-3 (townhome) district permits. As part of the
Planned Development the developer can create a development with higher density and smaller
lots than in a straight R-1 district.
Density The proposed development has a gross density of 3.39 units/acre and a net density of
4.85 units per acre.
L= The smallest lot is 5,749 s.f., the largest lot is 14,591 s.f. and the average lot size is 9,147
s.f.
Setbacks The property is completely surrounded by road right-of-way (Plaza Drive and Galaxie
Avenue), and was designed to maintain a 30' setbacks from the public right-of-way. Normal
setbacks from Galaxie Avenue are 50'. The developer is proposing 30', which would affect 11
lots. None of the I 1 lots adjacent to Galaxie Avenue have direct access to Galaxie Avenue.
According to the developer the reason for the 30' setback along Galaxie is due to the unusually
narrow and elongated shape of the parcel. The configuration was created by the road pattern
serving the adjoining parcels, the varied topography and the pond in the center of the site. In
addition, the 30' setbacks allow greater flexibility in locating the house pads in order to preserve
the existing trees.
The proposed setbacks area as follows:
Front yard: 20' minimum (from private street).
Rear yard: 20' minimum for any portion of the dwelling and 10' for decks (except lots
5,6,11,37, and 38 which abut Galaxie and are proposed to have a 30' setback)
Side yard - zero lot line - Located on or near the lot line.
Side yard - non-zero side - 5' minimum building setback.
Homes The home styles include ramblers, two stories and multi-level structures in sizes ranging
from 1,200 to 2,100 s.f. The exterior finishes are either vinyl or aluminum siding, and metal
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 5
garage doors. The houses feature color coordinated, narrow lap siding with white trim, 8/12 pitch
roofs, trimmed windows on all sides, window grids, 32 panel garage doors, a sidelight at the
main entry door, and transom windows at accent points.
The developer has approximately six primary building plans that are used as a base. From those
variations, custom plans are designed. The typical features include: high or vaulted ceilings,
fireplaces, air conditioning, deluxe master suites, transom windows, custom built cabinetry, and
and ceramic and wood flooring.
The price range anticipated is from $140,000 to $200,000.
Landscaping The landscape plan as presented is acceptable. Each home will be sodded and
provided with an underground sprinkler system. Three trees are also included as well as a front
yard rocked shrub bed with a minimum of 6 shrubs. A custom landscape plan is prepared for
each lot. Retaining walls, when necessary, are curvilinear, rock face landscape block.
Additional perimeter plantings will occur around the site. These will be a mixture of 6' and 8'
evergreens. Approximately seven groupings of larger scale shrubs will be mixed with the
evergreens. As part of the tree preservation the developer intends to tree spade 40 trees from the
site to perimeter locations.
Si age The proposed signage plan is acceptable. Two monument signs identifying the
"OakPointe" neighborhood are proposed for the northeast and the southwest corners of the site.
The signs are approximately 11'2" and 2'6" and will be approximately 3'6" above grade. The sign
.face will be taupe colored with white lettering. Out from the sign in each direction, one section
of low, white rail fence will be used for decorative purposes only. The Homeowners Association
will assume responsibility for the care and maintenance of the signs.
Preliminary Subdivision
Tree Preservation The tree preservation plan as submitted is acceptable. The site is
approximately 60% wooded with oak, black cherry, aspen and miscellaneous deciduous trees.
Pond AP-14 is located in the center of the site where it is surrounded by the above-mentioned
trees.
Staff has met twice with the developer and their landscape architect to review tree species,
location and vigor, and to review past occurrences of oak wilt and Dutch-elm disease on site.
A Tree Preservation Plan has been submitted which shows the existence of 206 significant trees.
The development plan as proposed will result in the removal of 47 significant trees (22.8% of
the total) during the initial phase of development (initial site grading, utilities installation and
street construction). According to the Tree Preservation Policy, allowable removal for this phase
of residential development is 25%.
~3_
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 6
Staff has requested that the developer submit a projection as to the amount of trees which will
probably be removed as individual lot development occurs throughout the project.
The submitted estimate of second phase tree clearing of significant trees states that 6% of the
remaining significant trees are "likely to be removed", and 15% of the remaining significant trees
are classified as "uncertain" as to whether they will be preserved or not. Using a worst-case
scenario, approximately 21% of the remaining trees following initial phone development will be
removed. Allowable removal, according to the Tree Preservation Policy, is 20%.
The developer has submitted Tree Preservation-related management activities which will take
place on site throughout the development.
• Approximately 40 existing individual trees or clumps of trees (primarily oak and
aspen) will be tree spaded from areas being graded to areas around the perimeter
of the overall site. This should exceed any "Replacement" requirement under the
terms of the Eagan Tree Policy.
• The home sites on the west side of the pond were redesigned to move the homes
approximately 20' further west to preserve additional trees on the pond slope.
• The lots in the northern portion of the site were reconfigured and pads adjusted
to maintain more of the Aspen grove in the center of the site and to allow a band
of Aspens to run through to Galaxie.
• Grading and finishing of the rear of the pads on Lots 13-18 of Block 1 and Lots
1-8 of Block 2 and portions of Lots 1-3 of Block 3 will be delayed until selection
of a specific home to allow custom grading and minimize tree loss.
• Close to 3 acres of open space is being retained in the center of the property.
• Decks and porches will be sited and designed to minimize tree removal when
possible.
• The street for the northern cul-de-sac is being located enter from Galaxie and to
run through the center of an area of dead trees (from oak wilt) which will reduce
the impact of the street on areas of healthy trees. It is located close to the natural
grade through the middle of the route to minimize the need for grading changes
in that area. The design minimizes excess road length to also minimize clearing
in the healthy wooded portion of the northern area of the development.
Because tree removal of 22.8% is less than allowable limits, no mitigation for this initial phase
of development is required.
~,4.
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 7
Grading/Storm Drainage - The majority of this site features mild to rugged topography. The
preliminary grading plan as presented is acceptable. The developer plans to grade the proposed
streets and entrances and custom grade each individual house site as they develop. The developer
shall be required to submit a concept grading plan depicting how each lot may be graded in the
future. This concept plan could be used to determine any potential drainage problems with each
lot. Grading has been minimized to protect existing forested areas to provide a buffer between
the neighborhoods to the south and the medical center property to the north of this development.
A large amount of fill material (6 to 12 feet) will be needed to grade the two cul-de-sacs on the
west side of the property.
With modifications, the storm drainage plan is acceptable and is in accordance with the City
Storm Water Management Plan (1990). The development is proposing to connect to the existing
storm sewer within the site leading to Pond AP-14. The developer shall be responsible for
verifying the capacity of the storm sewer pipes to which they are connecting. The developer
shall be responsible for clearing the dead trees below the high water level from Pond AP-14 to
minimize the possibility of fallen trees blocking the outlet pipe.
Water Quality/Wetlands This development is located in drainage basin A. Runoff from over 90%
of the developed site will be discharged to Pond AP-14, a designated sediment trap in the City's
water quality management plan. The remaining 10% (mostly backyards) will drain to a storm
sewer that discharges to Pond AP-15, another designated sediment trap. The nearest stormwater
runoff generated by the development of this site will have a runoff from over 650 acres of
residential and commercial land. Because there appear to be other more cost-effective
alternatives to improve water quality in Cliff Lake, a cash dedication for this development is
required.
The only jurisdictional wetland identified within the development site is the wetland complex
associated with Pond AP-14. No encroachment into, or drainage of this wetland is proposed for
this development.
Utilities - Sanitary sewer and water main are available to serve this site from Galaxie Avenue and
Plaza Drive. Sanitary sewer and water main stubs are available to serve the western cul-de-sac
of the development. Providing service to the remaining two cul-de-sacs will require the removal
and replacement of a portion of the Galaxie Avenue road surface.
A sanitary sewer and water stub exist in the northeast corner of the development. The sanitary
sewer stub cannot be utilized because the elevation of the stub is that which cannot be used by
a majority of the site. The developer shall be responsible for abandonment of the pipe at the
existing manhole on Plaza Drive.
Access/Street Design - The access and street design plan is acceptable. Previous proposals for
this site depicted all access to the site to be taken from Plaza Drive. However, due to steep
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 8
grades and tree preservation, the eastern two cul-de-sacs are proposed to take access onto Galaxie
Avenue.
As now proposed, one cul-de-sac street (Ridgecrest Circle) serving seven lots will enter onto
Plaza Drive and two cul-de-sac streets (Oakhill Court & Aspenridge Circle) serving 28 lots will
enter onto Galaxie Avenue.
The current proposal identifies the private streets as lots. The plans need to be revised to show
the private streets as easements wiwth the property lines extended. This
The developer has provided City staff with verification that there is sufficient sight distance on
the easterly cul-de-sac street (Aspenridge Circle) for a vehicle to access Galaxie Avenue on the
curved portion of the roadway based on passenger car turning movement design parameters set
forth in the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (1990). The
developer is providing sight distance in excess of the 310 feet required by the AASHTO Policy.
Easements/Right-of-Way - The developer shall provide an utility easement of 30 feet for the
proposed storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines between lots 9 and 14 of Oakhill Court to insure
the required 10 feet of separation between the two lines.
Parks and Recreation The proposed development is located in Park Service District 32.
RidgeCliff Park is the closest park to serve this development and is located approximately one-
half mile from the development site.
A cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication based on a single family development is
recommended for this development.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area The vacant area to the north located within the same
planned development is zoned and guided for Limited Business commercial. The higher density
units are a compatible use between the existing single family residential located east of Galaxie
Avenue and the commercial west of Plaza Drive.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The land use guide plan amendment appears to be a compatible
change in the overall development of that area. The higher density single family homes are a
suitable transititional use between the existing business to the west and the existing low density
residential, to the east of the site. The proposed subdivision appears to meet the required findings
for subdivsions as identified on pages 1 and 2 of this staff report.
ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment
To recommend approval or denial of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment
changing the land use designation from LB - Limited Business to D-II (0-6 units/acre) for the
10.3 acres.
Planning Report • OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 9
Planned Development Amendment
To recommend approval or denial of an overall amendment Preliminary Planned Development
Amendment for 35 zero lot line housing units subject to the following conditions:
1. Execution of the Planned Development Amendment.
2. The term of the Preliminary Planned Development Amendment shall be five years.
3. Final Development Plans shall be submitted which will include the following:
* Final Plat
* Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control
* Final Signage
* Final Landscaping
Signge
4. Two subdivision monument signs located in the NE and SW corners of the entire site (per
Landscape Plan).
5. The signs shall be subject to a one time $2.50/ square foot sign fee at the time of sign
permit application.
Homeowners Association
6. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording, with the subdivision,
appropriate documents establishing a Homeowners' Association. The documents must be
submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final subdivision approval.
Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners' Association shall be recorded with the
subdivision.
Architecture
7. No individual property fences shall be erected or constructed.
L
8. The common areas shown as outlots will be deeded over to the Homeowners' Association
at the time of final plat.
Preliminary Subdivision
To recommend approval or denial of the Preliminary Subdivision of 35 lots and four outlots on
10.30 acres. If approval of the subdivision is recommended it shall be subject to the following
conditions:
Standard Conditions
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council on February 3, 1993:
Al, B1, B2, B4,C1,C2,C3,D1,E1,F1,Gland H1.
Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan
June 27, 1995
Page 10
Platting
2. The subdivision for OakPointe of Eagan be platted.
3. The following notation should be made to the plat: The outlots denoted shall be common
area.
Tree Preservation
4. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for Lots 3, 5, 7, 15-39
(excluding lots 13 and 35, which are streets):
5. Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be
installed at the Drip line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is
greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
6. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the
issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation
Plan.
7. The developer shall clear the dead trees within Pond AP-14 below the high water level
of the pond.
Water Ouality
8. The subdivision shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication
Utilities
9. The developer shall abandon the existing sanitary sewer stub from Plaza Drive.
Grading
10. The developer shall submit a concept grading plan depicting the possible grading of each
lot in the development.
Parks and Recreation
11. The development is subject to a cash parks dedication based on single family rates.
12. The development is subject to a cash trails dedication.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. FinancialOblleatiens
1. This development shall accept Its additional financial obligations as defined
in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the
rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Riahts-af-way
1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements
centered over all lot Ines and, in addition, where necessary to
accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the
plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and
location as determined necessary by engineering standards.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to
public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage
capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this
development
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope
easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by
the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements
to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as
necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. Alf public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to
provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes,
engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final
PIM app-
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be
prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a
cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.
6 G1
4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the
proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan
shall be Included in the Development Contract and shall not be released
until one year after the date of City certified compliance.
0. Pubbtttc Imprevernents
.1. M any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the
appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat
approval.
E ,Permjts
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory
agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill Its park and trail dedication requirements as
recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
Commission and approved by Council action.
0. Vater Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication,
ponding, or a combination thereof In accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and
approved by Council action.
H. Othe
1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall
be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 215. 19B7 Eeetember 191987
Revised:
Revised: Feb1ry 2. 1993
LTSes
$TANoW.coN
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Oak Pointe of Eagan
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $78,548 on the parcels proposed for
platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat.
At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting.
The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and
land uses contained in the final plat.
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the
property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the
submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
Storm Sewer Trunk R3 5.02/sq ft 320,139 sq ft $6,403
Total S6,403
(c%(.
/ Y io 11Trr'
yN`t ' { Ci c w+ eAN $ ~~'lL a11~7E~ r
~~-1 OECRwf70D Ini OR.
flWTF•-'off'
r LA. tACpTif. 1 4AL
F u R. 4 :~J A
7)WA
Jy, PARK
1. If,A00RA1R YL
WAUVWI1
CEDAFQ f , ~4 • t ~ 1• 7. ` ,1r ~ 1LMORMK SAY
Cy,i
ACM RK i t . 1 p 1
oN cT.
- L.A s RK d - 6 - GT~~ 0?r.tr 11Yt1 t
pm or
< CDRA - C .
T k.~
g
a oRi ~T• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Wcs?
CEDAR ROCS, • " f f Ak o T C} CAN A LiW ARK , p{ 43
1 00
all
PARx
A I .
46:• -A A
1 E RAW .1
TT PARK CLIFF 9 a GK Y
LAKE
T
1Ra ~ g w
RD . CLiF ROAD i'?~ C" rl~ T
\T7l 86 RAM WAY Q'1, - - - - NOK Y NOKU WAY M l
49
w'
~ NANCY PLAN Al C ~f ~rII r
Co. I KET K
AK w
• T i TR T• i { , . co1A v
PAR a 1 W
3 It116$ RD. / ~ RDCECI~f ARK L
q(Y - - -
• / T • I.- and R. Ts. fK01 R.
1 G >t Am& R. $ WA KSTOE R. u
1 S i- Law n. K- m401111i rt. I N
yV A.. TAItw IT. 14- IIM R.
tT, r} >M ImytfTGp R IM SUMIQ lY NCT.
M 094 mi /T. IA- MIA n.
tA. sa sawntaa. R. la- u?Tw n.
M N04LN ?T. t" "Was R.
M wNwak R. Ss- STAY(IM R.
11?_ ft*~ PT. =16- A41A on.
+ ri.< IIr 1?IlWI R.
~~H ~,L.Sµ• LAKE
I P
APPLE VALLEY
LOCATION
1% AM
11NIN 1~
ANX A AA! ,ti
ZONING
PD-LB (Planned Development- _ / = I?=~_:1 R'
Limited Business
G8 i D-+1 Pf
Pf 0.111 '
P
I
csc 1 0.11
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN Zhu
PF D•1
- ~CPD
LS (Limited Business) N8 L8
~e ne u-1
Pf
L8
LB
_ pll
of
D•IV. ~ 0.11 P I _ I ~ ,
D•1 i l _ I 1 r
NV:1Vd jU NIUd)IVU
------------1 L ~ -
04
3 R
%
rrassR ~ \ -
Irr 'fit 1 ~s S \ i
1f' 11 iIr 1 ' s - I
j),,• ;11111 17 t! I J` ; a a 1
nt.r~1. Asir ~ 3 •
i
.4f 75
Ay•A
y T ill \ ~V{+ `y - • ~ s ~ / [
so /00
wt it
. ~ Ali t,. _,Il-r~•. t
i~AW¦giYltNt d N 1 1 q r~/~ •\\,\'C,t ` t 71'~
iiw'*' InIN*'GYM Jt l •I
R ' -1.1•Y«•? - ; 1tt1~1I/ `t i. `s 1 E
¦F ut Nyy, MW / 111'1 ;I ;1 . ` 1 , J ; I
f 1d tf ! 1¦t t f
I~t11J '
4
twrl wN tlNww • WN
.t,~! ¦ 1 a a Awl
t.t \ ` -
LIMA
IMig11 H1i41117~a~i~°wL17MiWtWIIi+N _ / t+•
{t1~ts~?r7...r.r>v1.a.a...ti;.. ' j/ (ii
66 6w ad a d A a Ad d64 it
~ nK t
tlttltll I114WtIW¦1 tNw t : a+ ¦+iaWMMd m !
r Ie~B
Yw•.Iy111A~Y1_- ~ __--_7~t171 1M71Y1i1w~.M1Ar\iidH?tiiiiY•11tYriM t ~ ~ , E ~
N « ....ww~wrN/ t.... w ..w t1 'N tNW"M p • •
((-5-.
• r
W rg ri'sii
77-
;41 L4
f y yam' y = '`Iu,
~ / . ? \ .ice.. - i
III II
7 t
II i ''f
n
III ' r~• • ~w W
f \
t o -i
h 1 ~
\ % ~ 1t
\,rt
\ i iii
pill
-01 1"559M momm
• .
It
saj} •
1.1~
- -•i - - - - - 1. / III
.41
:t r
III ~ 7 ~
41
• , .tT... ` VI
all
\ ~Y`~`\~ .t~'~; ~',a C{« ,•ti'X. ~?t it ¦
'jv
\ f f I. I I I
= i III
:D 1AJ
fit
fist
~It j{ I.l j~ s' i t fZ [ S e e w is S v r
ti { 1t I , !i[ 6
2, = 'is it1~;tai ; ii~:~f;;~'
t lit!
11 19 1 1 1 LE V15!2
Z
LLI
LL-
k ~ ~C
CL
--L=
7
rte- -
F
..r
W
cd 3E4
Q X
OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN
Ilo~'kr2~s Ma1'l.fv • 2'lt•bb ' ~ - T~4a~t~ ua~~~~1~ - l ~`~"hh
- ' UtTtE. P~Ne~~ 6P1R*-3L3
etAc,,C ~?U.s ~E . (o er, ~~l SAMPLE HOME LANDSCAPE PLAN
Each home landscape plan varies and is
customized for the site. All yards are
sodded and have underground sprinklers.
Each home landscape includes:
1- 2 1/2" Deciduous tree
1- 6' Evergreen tree
1- 1 1/2" Ornamental tree
6- Shrubs in an edged rock bed in front
WOVJ J0 3tr+bdXVO
1 \ /E
ti? : \ }
ooll
oo,
r+i;' it }
rut
, is 1c.
its
ILI
#•(~;~t {'1; it : f
114 11 •1 rI{r r ,:r{~~•;, ~ ~ •
W \ / S{1
`al
f P=.12r, tit.. 1
tail,
rrrrmm e, 9e ii 3 sP• i e 1
A99P~~-2Sr0~` ° IY IR7 _ ° " •
siBB.'S n• A-e P • ~T-~`: fly _ d ,aC-
pg
18- 7
AP- AAA
tl 9. #~9/~D 1
900 ~A' ` App ' ~g \
'b p
AP-50 AT R
[ACA BP.
la 7
IQ35. Mal
CAL. .01
RI ~ 13; _
~ A.
~ '13.0 L
0 RI 1 ? „ S T
` ~jS.S f ~ 9/d3 rs
f 1
• 9 ! ! DAICOT`I IICOUNTY PAAOQO
A~ q
AP A-° I
DAKOt'i CO4JNT
/ 9/lB
vs 1 92
B o *vs.
APPLE
VALLEY L
I A
ewe .
PROJECT SITE
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER
LAYOUT
MAP-...
6h.116 . .
STSIb/ Ln STATION "-fto . . .
• • • • waft VT STATN •
CITY STONY or..' . o
r?..
rA+oll 61vl.lofl -0 -0
OF 0~
ON A NATIN Tatra
140. 0
pEAGAN ow WON WA,SN 1aM1, . t 100.0
otrtltrrANO
a ummSam. • . . . ssasssss
Lit
MANN lG*
PARK ( ~{0• LA
MAP CUFF \1 I ,
PARK ?fN '?t SAFARI
1 :EOM V LE g , AT Ir
3~tV t
~ t f
FiRK, 1 is p f n
OAK= ra'jC O • 1 2
t E°o ( 1s • • ' 1
/10
;I I T 1 real 19 1
Man
R t
V / a
~ L •N
R AKOtA COUNTY PARK
1
sA I Q
` ' p Q~ • I DAKOTA CO
lK 10
I
I Z~ APPLE f } VALLEY
c
PROJECT SITE
FIG.NO.8
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
CITY OF
EAGAN
w-JAll
-Az
zo.,`~~I j ,12!?.V4~-ak_:t ~.`e~~ia: [sorIn,
~ u~~i • ~ a~ ~ i'ti.~aQ ,4ilY
112 -IfCIAy
QD, 1• "A-LOTS '.l 1.. • 'I is j T i _ : 1
too
ccvkl
1! 90
tt rr IZ" T 1 *AA U Y^r=
t >flc Isis~i;441 1.~./ i^.:• 1r:t.^ wn"FQ.~1~ "
uL
DA90Ta COUNTY PARK
t~-r- l%Trr-~^y\r
W-R2
t APPLE
VALLE 1j
ii1 t C -
C-R2
PROJECT SITE
FIG. NO. 7
SANITARY SEWER
TRUNK LAYOUT
CITY OF
• EAGAN ~7.
CLIFF LAKE SHORES - HOFFMAN HOMES, INC
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
June 19, 1995
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION:
1. This plat is within Park Service District 30 which is served by Meadowlands
and Rahn Park. Meadowlands Park was the dedicated park from this
P.U.D. Consequently, there is no park dedication with this subdivision.
However, the exception shown for future development will be required to
make a cash dedication at the time of development. The proposal appears
to meet the requirment for providing open space for informal recreation
opportunities.
2. This plat will be responsible for a cash trails dedication.
3. Pond AP-23 is located on the north side of Cliff Lake Road and because it is
off site, staff is recommending a cash water quality dedication.
4. The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable as presented.
d\cfshores
DRAFT
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: May 15, 1995 CASE: 29-PP-17-5-95
APPLICANT: Patrick Hoffman HEARING DATE: June 27, 1995
PROPERTY OWNER: Cliff Road Properties PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Planned Development Amendment and a Preliminary Subdivision (Cliff
Lake Shores)
LOCATION: Outlot E, Cliff Lake Centre
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
ZONING: Planned Development (PD)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Patrick Hoffman of Hoffman Homes, Inc., is requesting approval of a Preliminary Planned
Development Amendment to allow a residential development, and a Preliminary Subdivision
consisting of 73 lots and one outlot on approximately 24 acres identified as Outlot E, Cliff Lake
Centre (PID# 10-17780 - 050-00) located south of Cliff Lake Road, west of I-35E, and northeast
of Cliff Lake in the SW 1/4 of Section 29.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and
the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:"
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage,
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use
contemplated.
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health
problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds or similar burden.
1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within
the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar
Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake
Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with
the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management
Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained
therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made
a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein
at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality
Management Plan and make the same available to the public.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The 24 acre site is located within the 384 acre Eagan Hills West Planned Development (PD) that
was created in 1979 with a 15 year term. Although the PD has expired, the City Council has not
taken action to terminate the agreement. The subject site represents the last undeveloped parcel
within this PD.
The current PD zoning of the parcel (as provided in the PD Agreement) allows for high density
residential (16+ u/ac) and commercial CSC-RB-LB uses. There were no specific uses identified
other than that the residential density listed is a maximum and that less density shall be permitted
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 3
at the developer's sole discretion.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site contains a rolling topography that ranges from a low elevation of 890 (ordinary water
level of Cliff Lake) to a high elevation of 944 in the northeastern comer of the property. The
property had been farmed which results in the majority of the site being open grassland. The
significant trees and woodlands are primarily concentrated around the lake and the western
property line just north of the lake.
The old Boesel farm house is still occupied by Ms. Anna Boesel and four of the associated out
buildings are included in a 1.4 acre exception area located near the center of the site. An old
unoccupied residence, barn, silo, and a couple of out buildings located outside of the exception
area will be removed as part of this development.
SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan
designations surround the subject property:
North - Cliff Lake Townhomes, zoned PD, and guided D-III, Mixed Residential (6-12 u/ac).
South - Cliff Lake (DNR designated Pitt Lake)/Cliff Road.
East - Blackhawk Road/I-35E.
West - Cliff Lake Centre (Cub Foods), zoned PD, and guided CPD.
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
A. Preliminary Planned Development
Com atibili with Surrounding Area - The area surrounding the proposed residential development
has developed (Cliff Lake Centre) or has been approved for a specific development (Cliff Lake
Townhomes - phase II). With appropriate screening of the subdivision from the retail
development to the west and the interstate freeway to the east, the development appears to be
compatible with the area. The amenity provided by Cliff Lake also adds a desirable quality to the
proposed residential development.
Density - The developer is proposing a gross site density of 2.9 units/acre and a net site density
of 3.7 units /acre. The proposed density is consistent with Eagan Hills West PD Agreement.
L= - Although each unit will be platted as an individual lot, the average amount of site area per
unit exceeds 11,000 SF.
Setbacks - The developer is requesting several deviations from City Code standard setback
requirements. Specifically, setback variations from MnDot right-of-way are proposed for a portion
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 4
of the circular private drive (no setback proposed), Lots 5, 8, 9, and 12, Block 1 (45' setback
proposed), and Lot 26, Block 3 (36' setback proposed). The City Code requires a minimum street
setback of 20' and building setback of 50'. The closest paved surface of the freeway (the
southbound I-35E exit ramp to Cliff Road) to the property line is 110' and all other building and
street setbacks are met.
Building Architecture - All units will be constructed with a maintenance-free exterior including
an approximate average of 20% brick. The developer is proposing three unit types with a base
price starting at $100,000 for the quad units and $140,000 or $180,000 for the two duplex unit
types.
Parking/Guest Parking - Each unit includes a two-car garage which meets the City Code required
parking provision and the developer is also providing an additional 16 guest parking stalls.
Landscaping - The Landscape Plan is acceptable. The developer has revised the plan to provide
for required screening along MnDot right-of-way and retaining walls have been added in the
backyards of units backing up to Cliff Lake Centre. The site grade falls off towards the shopping
center which made screening difficult. The retaining walls will provide a small, flat backyard area
that will be treated with evergreen trees and shrubs that will provide effective year-round
screening of the top of the shopping center
Homeowner's Association - The developer should be responsible for preparing and recording with
the plat, appropriate documents establishing a homeowner's association. The documents should
be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to Final Subdivision approval.
Transfers of common areas to the homeowner's association should be recorded with the plat.
B. Preliminary Subdivision
Grading/ Wetlands - Minor revisions to the Grading Plan are necessary. The proposed grading
minimizes the site run off to Cliff Lake. The developer should revise the Grading Plan to include
detailed plans and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction.
The only wetland on site is Cliff Lake which is designated as a Class II - indirect contact
recreation water body, in the City's water quality management plan. The developer has
incorporated several provisions that will protect Cliff Lake and the adjacent wetland/upland
complex.
The developer is proposing to maintain a 50' wide buffer of the existing vegetation measured back
from the ordinary high water mark (OWHM). This buffer area should be identified and designated
as a permanently protected area on the Grading Plan. The limits of this area should also be
marked in the field prior to any site grading.
7~ I
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 5
Storm Drainage/Water Oual_ity - Minor revisions are necessary to the Storm Drainage Plan. Storm
water generated from this site will be directed off-site to an existing storm water basin (AP-23).
A large storm event will exceed the design capacity for this development which will cause excess
run off to overflow the entrance to the site and cause ponding in the low point of Cliff Lake Road.
The developer should add additional catch basins beyond those proposed to minimize the potential
for flooding.
AP-23 is located on the north side of Cliff Lake Road and because it is off site, staff is
recommending a cash water quality dedication for this project to the Advisory Parks, Recreation,
and Natural Resource Commission (APRNRC).
A small portion of the site will drain to Cliff Lake Centre and the developer should take
precautions during grading and construction to prevent any erosion from occurring from the steep
slope on the west side of the site on to the shopping center property.
Utilities - The Utility Plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer and water main stubs were previously
provided to this site as part of the Cliff Lake Centre development and the associated construction
of Cliff Lake Road.
Access/Street Design - The proposed access and circulation is unacceptable. A single access point
is provided to the site from Cliff Lake Road and internal circulation is provided via private street
and drive network. The developer should revise the plans to remove the "Outlot A" designation
for the private street and instead provide a private ingress/egress access easement to provide access
to each lot. This private ingress/egress access document should be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney prior to Council action on the Final Subdivision. This easement document should
also be recorded with the plat.
The existing curb cut entrance to the site was also provided when Cliff Lake Road was
constructed. The City Fire Marshal has reviewed and approved the site's internal access.
Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - The developer will be required to acquire a permit from
MnDot to allow a small amount of grading in the I-35E right-of-way.
Tree Preservation - The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable. The developer is proposing a single
phase development that is allowed a significant tree removal of 47.5%. There are total of 156
significant trees on site and the developer is proposing to remove 42 of those trees or 26.7%;
therefore, no mitigation is required.
Parks and Recreation - KEN VRAA IS REVIEWING THIS ISSUE
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 6
As designed, the development will be compatible with the surrounding area. The developer is
proposing a "site sensitive" residential development that takes advantage of the existing wetland,
limits the amount of tree removal, and provides adequate screening of the site from the
surrounding land uses.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To approve/deny a Preliminary Planned Development Amendment to allow a mixture of duplex
and quad-type residential units on Outlot E, Cliff Lake Centre which is located within the Eagan
Hills West Planned Development.
To approve/deny the Cliff Lake Shores Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 73 lots on 24.24
acres located south of Cliff Lake Road, west of I-35E, and northeast of Cliff Lake.
Approval subject to the conditions listed below.
Preliminary Planned Development Amendment
1. Execution of a Planned Development Amendment Agreement.
2. The amended Planned Development shall expire in 5 years from Council approval.
3. A 28 building, 70 unit, twin and quad home residential project to be platted as
"Cliff Lake Shores" is approved as shown on the Site Plan dated May 26, 1995, for Outlot
E, Cliff Lake Centre as part of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development.
4. A Final Planned Development Agreement for this site shall be executed prior to Final
Subdivision and Final Planned Development approval. The following exhibits are
necessary for this Agreement:
* Final Site Plan
* Final Building Elevation Plans
* Final Landscape Plan superimposed on the Final Grading Plan
Upon submission of these final plans, provided they are in conformance with the
Preliminary PD, the Final PD may proceed to the City Council for approval.
5. All landscaped and green areas shall be served by an underground irrigation system.
6. All trash/recycling containers shall be stored in individual garages.
7. Setback deviations from MnDot right-of-way shall be allowed as presented for the private
Planning Report - Cliff Lake Shores
June 27, 1995
Page 7
street, Lots 5, 8, 9, and 12, Block 1, and Lot 26, Block 3.
Preliminary Subdivision
Standard Conditions
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council on February 3, 1993:
Al, B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, GI, and H1.
2. The developer shall plat the property.
Homeowner's Association
3. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording with the plat, appropriate
documents establishing a homeowner's association. The documents must be submitted and
approved by the City Attorney's office prior to Final Subdivision approval. Transfers of
common areas to the homeowner's association shall be recorded with the plat.
Gradin /Drainage
4. The developer shall construct additional catch basins near the entrance to the development.
5. The developer shall provide detailed plans and specifications for the retaining wall
construction.
6. The developer shall provide measures to prevent erosion from occurring into Cliff Lake
and off site.
7. The developer shall delineate the buffer area from the lake as a permanently protected area
on the Grading Plan.
8. The developer shall mark, in the field, the limits of this buffer area prior to any site
grading.
Access
9. The developer shall prepare a private ingress/egress document to be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney's office prior to Council action on the Final Subdivision.
The developer shall record the private ingress/egress easement with the plat.
Dedications
10. The developer shall pay a cash water quality dedication.
K3
9F, Kio
I Ofckwooo DR.
Er Oi IAMNIf IML
Wq
Ala
~ I AR ~uW
;A7M
1. IrAOO.aAIK w
,1T it. r• a r 1 t.' I O b ...inw.wa .sr
•1. A
1tl( 6
wk*y DR 51• T " ~
Wcw
g r M ~e^ G d I `a Mo.
AU Yr
CtDAR al i ' ~AII P i G} r CAM A
CMm
WLAM
43
cF: NI ti. o
PARK
ID ~7.
Aft
s
- - - ` a - - - . - - , of C6Fr MAD V? { FAi/
No" WOKM
'kQAL
DAM WAY C1 wAr c
IIAlIC CIR. RAC r !1 i KETT
1C 0 IV
3
kD.
CUM IN K c
PAR ET. lr ow" Fr. w. M"
1 it AI.( IT, L?- wlxsrvt R. ~ u
rY• ~ ~ lA^A ot, la+ IOAy(,11>L A. \ M
• y L- IMO R. 1w- umb" rr.
? f~ ~P~T SI r O is 1r- 601A pl. T.
Iv
wrsdg" Pr r- u?T. on.
/aytA rr. /w- Iu1101 /r.
1 ' AY bl M /T. 'JI•- %1AVUM PT.
Tw•~ IAy rr. llr KIA rt.
11r I.grAn /1.
a ~T• N ,
1'x"5 ~ two .
- P~
APPLE VALLEY
LOCATION
GI,.
nle T ( - A
1~flpft LI111Z1! y Ih~ff~' It 'P+...:
PIK
ZONING N6rIN 1•~~ `,'~1~1~
II NA ~ .tl V! P
PD (Planned Development) P` i
ea,. J. Pp A I r-(llfkt~-r `r 4,~ f
Mww ' ~
eawn , . A A A A 9 A r
L8 if R
J c F;1
. m,4
P Au
,y • <<7IIIll A.rc FnNr
POO'CIRD GB '6 0
RN
AS iji p PF NB
Nf
PF NB • • • 0.111 /
PF
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN 1:J01 °e -
L8 P O
CPD (Commercial Planned PF 0.111 i ,
Development) 'y-D 11. P
CSC
Od11 ~
0-IV 1 = ' CPO . r
NO LB
_ NB Ld ` ! LB PF NB 01
O1001 LB
_
PF 0•u
D•rv. P
P 01
lilt
_ ~dre+~`
; !s "sere FII511
ipi
~ $ tl#t;~y~iib ~ I
N, fill
1 11 i w L .
c-1 t 1 ~ ' ~ j~
off. )k
i j
Al pi
Q( I I I~ • . ~rr,', t a to
• { e
~ I I LLB ~ ~ : { R ~ # ~ >t f
OL WIN I p
11 p•A 1 1 / 1 0[ 1[1
o r, j1 T
w i Q U 1 i mac` T ~ j
tal
` \ 113f Z ]
% to
lit
iiI ' % i r •l
low
! of +j ~ ~ 1
L7 ¦ F f .3
CTI
/ ~ i~ 9 ~ ~ {73 s Er ~ Y4 s 's
. ;~p
E;ta¢
{ 71&1
WRIN oil
Iiii 6
! E f ~s l.i~ iii
it ! h ¦ 1 end Qgg
Jill I
} - a 1 t• !1r ! I; I IIhii1i1iI
r R ~iR it/ rNI
'lit
41,
pooN?ii~= I a. = I ~~~5~' I I mow t+•-
Ifi
v SIAM ,'i'•• , , ~ rte, r \
t
~ ~ $g~ OxA~soei8
.«a.ooj
;ems' ~ C•..
r' Mnltttll I j j ~ 11'tttpp4ttt
O / . I I •N N•??
~S / Ma ttttllllll1 till
':r ~r * Z f'/ F ~1Sl~xlll~YYIYYYLYN
• I r. 1 IMrtjj.••¦.......tttlttglltun
pJ ~ L~ MMq~titltttt.tittdlt.tt•!
_ saw%
~#1 lily
pOOA~f~ ~ . r.. rrr~~~ ...r. ~ wISIw~Yd/ 1
1 I ill
r f
-ion
II I i lilll
y 11{t r. \
WIN
1 Ali %'1~~~ / III
lot al
all U-1
Rat
®
® 0 m 0 0®
N"q -
EEO OED
MINNETONKA DESIGN, INC. HOFFMAN HOMES. INC.
6. ?6u. S. sw..1rs THE "STERLING"
on usrs
" • ...t w N A RL (61.10 1311-fop /1.1 (618) Mh6M6 CrS~I
awl
: Bit !I I,
ssxe.. - ~
j ?
FA
• I
I • 11
Iti I
• ;I
• it
-
•
i i
0
- ` - - = i gin.
W.54 WE -
MINNETONKA DESIGN, INC.
HOFFAUN HOMES. INC.
St. UN r. na rrrrr THE "TRENTON"
aw..~......
M furl p.-+••r rAZ u (rrt) w..r
ae» ~
z
1i
per ~ D
oil
arm
.G I
• 1
d
t
pt oil
I
I
II
Air
r f
m
0 m 0
w, t arr. _
_~a"`}*a 1s S-
r-1-1 IF
M[NNE1'ONKA DESIGN, INC.
HOff.N.a:V HOMES. INC. THE "NORMANDY" R. b
wi V L~ f
!f[ Nrll -''a IN Ilr i /Srto
!s!.-
fl 311-30!
it
In
s
U-V ~ I
I
HIM Ililll
LL LL L
ONO=
I
t
1 I _I pp~ F i
--r~ ~ 181~~ h
11 1 I I
~ ~
I now
O~ ~O
rtrtli ~ Ilnn
_ _
- - -
1 LAMA( sn 0~-llf
rITh AP•~ 4 tfj Ar-/ 920. J
3~ Imo/
EN A-- SM. S . P~ZI ^ P•25
124.0
s AP g 92x.5 B
PrSJ
"CIF a •24
9 4TF0
• 'e
T. ~
~i ' o 9 b OAKQ
P-13
A9b. t~ OP .
LUTO
AP- A. . to 41
Be i0 A-c X44
KDRAMN
P n
9• LA 1893
t~R?~ ~s r
AP
' - 1 SAFARI
AP- 50 AT
EACn ei
?~u 892.0 ~rT w"g
pr
E Ri +S'9
PROJECT SITE
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT Via"
MAP STORM .ab.A. 40'" . . . . . .
.TOnr i. T ITATNNl F..r.M) . . . . • • • s
I1 1aT STATION Mme.. . . . . . . 0
CITY 070" 00010 #am . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .?~...0
OF MASON TeWe+ON . _I_•
POMl NOANIA". INA?U L1VI.. . 900.0
E A G A N Paw MIeN rAT.N . ti sOOA
/'/J DSO alUewet Male . . . . . sass:sia
LLI
14
_ _ i ;l?tITIT ?T_;;j
Trl-r 11:11' ,~a 1' ..,ir ri~]~/~;C .f~~ ~ii ZM. A _ ( ~ w~// :i
t+„~~.,~1 ~ ,i•~',^.« + ~ r ~ ~ `yam, A 0.
! ' (-,STS'
•";~j\'~~\~~ 7 hr ~ilf~/(,•i ' ~ .3. rt-r'~ys ' ' ;1.~ I ~i,~
~ I ~ S~ i'1 1 ;;;.1• .r ~ I r~ irj ~ C~ '1_ ! TnUw.
41 liv-4
-,.,u W - N
,`•,v IB1/ .~:I:r1:S \ X4`15, ~Y .t `L
rNMn W-j
~~]]]]rrr J 2T
~V1L i . w (811 /j / - 1~ , ~I ~`~nx~. I r^yr ~I-~L,
2V
SAFAlif
12 j
NTk~{T~I I ~ 11 _ 1• - 7f ~11' ~l, o i ~ ' ~`F;C`:• i ~~-7
CEILttft N,u(~ IS e /L'4'.:! tt' I(lr1FY, r {
*40
• :i. ~ i-i-ii 7 I
PROJECT SITE
FIG. NO. 7
SANITARYSEWERTAUNK LAYOUT
CITY OF
EAGAN
DRAFT
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: May 25, 1995 CASE: 11-PP-18-5-95
APPLICANT: Robert L. Johnson HEARING DATE: June 27, 1995
PROPERTY OWNER: First Industrial L. P. PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Apollo Addition), Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION: 900 Apollo Road
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND)
ZONING: Light Industrial (LI)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
R.L. Johnson Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision in order to split the
39.4 acre part of Lot 7, Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 (PID# 10- 22502-073-
04) into two parcels and a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage of semi trailers on
proposed Lot 1, Apollo Addition. The site is located south of the Apollo Road/Lunar Lane
intersection and west of Mike Collins Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 11.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:"
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C .That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage,
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use
contemplated.
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development.
/o'/'
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 2
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgement of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds or similar burden.
I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake
Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed
with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein
as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public.
City Code Section 11.40 Subd. 4 states that: "The Planning Commission shall recommend a
conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such Conditional Use Permits only if it finds
that such use at the proposed locations:"
A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the
neighborhood or the City.
B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions.
C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in
appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not
change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 3
values within the neighborhood.
D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems
and schools.
E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic
congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets.
G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature
of major importance.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 was platted between 1967 and 1969. The Donaldson
Company constructed the existing office/manufacturing/warehouse building in 1969.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site contains an existing approximately 300,000 SF building that is currently leased by
Anchor Hocking Plastics. Anchor Hocking is looking to sublease approximately 20,000 SF of
office space within the building that is currently vacant. The building has rail access on the east
side, loading docks on the west side, and pedestrian access on the north side.
The primary parking area for the building is located along the circular drive in front of the
building and the parking lot located northwesterly of the building. The field inspection performed
by staff revealed that, currently, the parking area adjacent to Apollo Road is being used for
parking semi trailers. This parking area is in disrepair and should be overlaid.
SURROUNDING USES
The subject site is surrounded by property zoned and designated for industrial development.
Surrounding uses include Manna Freight Systems, Continental Safety Equipment, and John Henry
Foster Air Pressure Equipment.
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
A. Preliminary Subdivision
/o
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 4
Compatibili with Surrounding Area - The proposed 158,000 SF office/warehouse building is
a permitted use in the LI zoning district and the use will be compatible with existing and future
land uses in this area.
- The proposed subdivision will create two lots: Lot 1= 28.4 acres; Lot 2 = 11 acres.
Parking - The developer is providing adequate on site parking; however, the stalls provided have
nine foot widths. City policy has required ten foot wide stalls regardless of land use. The
developer should revise the plans to provide for ten foot wide parking spaces.
Setbacks - As proposed, the subdivision will create lot boundaries that allow the existing and
proposed buildings and site development to meet all LI district building and parking/drive aisle
setbacks.
Grading/Wetlands - The Grading Plan is not acceptable. The Plan should be revised to
incorporate a larger storm water ponding area and reflect grading necessary for culvert pipe
extensions. The developer should also provide detailed plans and specifications for any retaining
walls to be constructed as part of the development of Lot 2.
There are no wetlands on site.
Storm Drainage/Water Quality - The Storm Drainage Plan is unacceptable. The proposed
drainage plan is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan.
The developer is proposing a small storm water pond to be constructed on Lot 2; however, this
storm drainage system will over-burden the existing trunk storm sewer line in Apollo Road. The
undersized storm water pond proposed will overflow into Pond EP-11 (designated as a Class VU,
storm water basin) which was not designed to handle this flow. EP-11 is located west of the
subject site. This drainage issue could be alleviated if the storm water run off from the site was
collected in catch basins located between Lots 1 and 2 and directed in an easterly direction to
pond EP-1 which is located off site and designated as a Class V, nutrient trap.
There are existing culverts that drain a large portion of Lot 1 to Pond EP-1 This drainage has
caused erosion problems on the banks of EP-1, at the point of discharge.
The developer should provide a larger on-site storm water pond or route all of the run off to EP-1
and mitigate the existing erosion problems by extending the culvert pipes from the present
location to a point at the normal water level of Pond EP-1.
Because there are no recreational water bodies downstream from EP-1, staff is recommending a
cash water quality dedication to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource
Commission (APRNRC).
/4l
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 5
Utilities - Adequate utilities are available to serve the site; however, due to issues regarding the
storm sewer system, the ultimate design of these lines will have to be determined prior to Council
action on the Final Subdivision.
Access/Parkin Lots - The forty acre site currently has four access points from Apollo Road. The
developer is proposing a private access to serve the newly created lot. The developer should
submit this private easement document to the City Attorney's office for review and approval prior
to Council action of the Final Subdivision.
The existing parking and staging areas serving Lot 1 are either in a state of disrepair or not
currently constructed to City standards and there is evidence of traffic maneuvering off of the
paved surfaces and onto green areas. The developer should overlay and/or upgrade these areas
to current City standards.
Basements/Rights of Way/Permits - The developer is proposing a private ingress/egress access
easement to provide access to Lot 2. These documents should be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney prior to Council action on the Final Subdivision.
Tree Preservation - The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable. The site contains approximately
125,000 SF of significant woodlands and ten significant trees (14" - 18" cottonwoods). The
developer is proposing to remove 73% of the significant woodlands and 100% of the significant
trees. Accordingly, tree mitigation is required and the developer will be responsible for providing
229 Category B trees in addition to standard landscaping required.
Considering the large size of the proposed building and associated parking area, a high
percentage of removal is inevitable. The developer is proposing to plant the mitigation trees
around the new building site and along the railroad tracks located south and east of the existing
building.
Over 100 of the mitigation trees that are proposed to be planted along the south property line of
this subdivision will serve no tangible purpose other than meeting mitigation requirements;
therefore, staff is recommending to the APRNRC that off site mitigation occur for approximately
100 of the mitigation trees be planted.
The developer should provide tree protective measures (ie. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is
greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
The developer should also contact the City Forester at least five days prior to any site. grading
to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
Parks and Recreation - The developer will be subject to a cash park and trail dedication.
/ate.
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 6
Landscaping - The Landscape Plan is unacceptable. The landscaping proposed around the new
building to be located on proposed Lot 2 is acceptable; however, the developer has not provided
a Landscape Plan for Lot 1. The Plan should be revised to include a mixture of plant materials
along the entire north boundary of the proposed subdivision.
B. Conditional Use Permit
Outdoor storage is allowed in the Industrial Zoning District only by Conditional Use Permit
(CUP). City staff informed the property owner that a CUP was required for the existing outdoor
trailer storage.
On November 19, 1991, the City Council adopted the following Standards for Outdoor Storage:
a. Outdoor storage items shall be placed within an enclosure.
b. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in the Limited
Industrial District.
c. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be
stored.
d. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback area or other
required setbacks.
e. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement.
f. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure.
g. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaping areas.
h. The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust
and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration.
i. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation of
required off-street parking for the principal use of the property.
The CUP is being requested to allow for the continued use of this parking area for trailer storage.
The outdoor storage area cannot meet a number of the Council adopted Standards for Outdoor
Storage. The developer should, at a minimum, prepare a plan indicating how this storage area
will be screened from the public right-of-way.
In industrial areas, the City generally requires, and prefers, storage areas to be located behind the
~Q ~
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 7
principal building and/or in rear yards. This situation is unique because the area being used for
storage was originally constructed for employee parking but the current tenant does not have an
employee parking demand for this space.
The property owner has explained that the use of this area is strictly tenant driven. Because the
Anchor Hocking operation is not labor intensive, employee parking needs are not competing for
this parking area; however, a future leasee may utilize this area entirely for employee parking.
Because the type of demand for this parking/storage area is subject to change, any outdoor
storage approval should be contingent upon maintaining the primary use of this parking lot for
employee parking. Should the tenant change or use of the building change in such a fashion that
requires a more intense employee parking need, the outdoor storage of trailers should be
discontinued.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The proposed subdivision and development on Lot 2 is consistent with the existing Industrial
Zoning and Land Use designation and will be compatible with existing and anticipated uses in
the vicinity.
Issues pertaining to storm water drainage and landscaping can be dealt with prior to Council
action on the Final Subdivision.
The requested CUP for the existing outdoor storage of semi trailers does not meet a number of
the established Standards for Outdoor Storage. If approved, the semi trailer storage use of the
parking lot should be considered a secondary use to employee parking.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To approve/deny the Apollo Addition Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots on
approximately 40 acres located generally south of the Apollo Road/Lunar Lane intersection.
To approve/deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow semi-trailer storage on Lot 1, Apollo
Addition.
Approval subject to conditions listed below.
Preliminary Subdivision
Standard Conditions
1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council on February 3, 1993:
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 8
Al, B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, GI, and HI.
2. The developer shall plat the property.
3. The developer shall revise the Grading Plan to incorporate a larger on-site storm water
pond or a drainage plan that catches the run off between lots I and 2 and routes it to EP-
1.
4. The developer shall extend the existing culvert pipes to a point at the normal water level
of Pond EP-1.
5. The developer shall provide detailed plans and specifications for any retaining walls to
be constructed.
6. The developer shall upgrade all parking and staging areas to current city standards.
7. The developer shall prepare a private ingress/egress document to be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney's office prior to Council action on the Final Subdivision.
The developer shall record the private ingress/egress easement with the plat.
8. The developer shall work with staff to determine appropriate off site planting locations
for approximately 100 of the mitigation trees required by the City's Tree Preservation
Guidelines.
9. The developer shall provide tree protective measures installed at the Drip Line or at the
perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant
trees/woodlands to be preserved.
10. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to any site
grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan.
11. The developer shall be subject to a cash park, trail, and water quality dedication.
12. The developer shall revise the Landscape Plan to incorporate landscaping for the entire
subdivision.
Conditional Use Permit
1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the plat at Dakota County.
2. Outdoor storage shall be limited to semi trailers.
Planning Report - Apollo Subdivision
June 27, 1995
Page 9
3. The storage area shall be screened from Apollo Road.
4. The outdoor storage of semi trailers shall be discontinued upon the termination of Anchor
Hocking's interest in the property or the assignment or subleasing by Anchor Hocking of
more than 20,000 SF of the existing space within the building located at 900 Apollo Road.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept Its additional financial obligations as defined
In the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the
rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
8. Easements and Rlahts•ef.Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements
centered over all lot fines and, In addition. where necessary to
accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the
plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and
location as determined necessary by engineering standards.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to
public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage
capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this
development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope
easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by
the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements
to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as
necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements.
C. Plans and Seeetfieations
1. AN public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to
provide service to this development shall be designed and Certified by a
registered professional engineer In accordance with City adopted codes,
engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final
Pic approval-
2 A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be
prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat
approval
3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a
cul-de-sec constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A separate detailed landscape plan shalt be submitted overlaid on the
proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan
shall be Included in the Development Contract and shalt not be released
until one year after the date of City certified compliance.
D. Public Improvements
• 1. If any knprovements are to be hstalled under a City contract, the
appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat
approval.
E Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory
agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as
recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
Commission and approved by Council action.
0. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication,
ponding, or a combination thereof In accordance with the criteria Identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and
approved by Council action.
M. -Ott
1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall
be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25. 1997 Aentember 15. 1987
Rafted: Ju f y 10.1990
1 -
Revised:ruarv 2.1993
LTS+s
$TANOMD.cON
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Apollo Addition
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $4,366 on the parcels proposed for
platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat.
At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting.
The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and
land uses contained in the final plat
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the use proposed for the
property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the
submitted plans..
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
None
V r r 1 r
1 AFATRICE ST.IfN
I
`rts
K T. LEXWGTO rFr,.
1 K F T. IRK OAK
SERv+CE .S. POST ~
FF o
~~I 94 CO. 90
JO C
26 -1 LONE OAK 6A0
LONE i
CLUBVIEW DR APOLLO 4 T
7/z
1 U
r >Ir
1 RD. 1 - 1'.1 - - r-
i ALDRW OR,
d
LIARAC PT.
ZCH PT. , u
AWAY PT
REST RODE Tit I W
)NW000 LA.
DW000 PT. I I
RUCE PT.
<EE DOODLE ROAD I ( ~ 01
WEE PL. a - - - - - ~ cor r - - - -
0 CARRIAGE HLLS a 5 1 COTT
GOLF- COURSE Ni RAL
T. vl 1VY CT.
24,,P- LEARY PARK VEW
O' LEA 10
ILAA K,
1J E
w TR. '41- h1I o T
NO ~y.*CT
i I < CT. Q'•~AT AK
i --W -r---- - W-- -I T_ W 1 _ _
AV.
T ARn,TI
q ti A ; JAY WA y T. 81 9P
S t 1 MUELLER "t 5"ELRE
I u u FARM P 1ss 1P' C. I CT. ^bl
FAL WA t CT VERLOOK PL. SOUTH WNDT EY z 's rr r Sit 1v L Cat.
LA < o ~ y
W® 4
WESCO 72 _ ENT%
WrPMt7 Mew
LOCATION
• ~~wtioA I
.0ftf OAX MAO Al
~I w N9 p•;
TAB ,
ZONING E cep ;
II tl{ R•i i~
-1 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL)
ml 2A
I TO"Illi RI a isiiAt .
r_ . _ _ ? CPC
I I
IND PF
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
IND (INDUSTRIAL) '
I Ge ~ 0•u
Ne
~ o•I J
•OI i
IND ~i • I'^t
1141-
V
"S. i..WIrt ar • o
=a saw
i u.
¦ N ago. a-rrw f U'
r se •
01
LLqm
CS, LANE
% al
cbr
.III I I I I I
V
~ ~IIIII~ I~•.I ~t ii = ~ 'y
I r O
$ O
f f f j ? j f j f i l t l j ( S a o 111
t~ ffi~ttff 1p1
sE #~ft I
- .,p •u•• APOLLO SUBDIVISION A, ALL-METRo
PRELIMINARY PLAT j . , •
~w.w w.w~an
s
0
i
~0 s !
0
0
0
f o
# I Iii
more
0 J1. I
J.rji
!f ° < i ! j!•1~ iI i' i t1!I 5
F Poll.
C e 1 I I ` V
.csc:• ~a a II ti
save-^: e:n s.C ~ f r7f
3 :s'e;t a se':z: e eit T
Sr ~E "
Kai
J CUBE
5^ SSYe 1 / f R1
:\tr.0~ sO^:OVt
_?^YOb '"Oat OOE ` '
~ l7irA
i~ lr.e. so>+
sit
I 1\~ O \ I I I I I/sl
09
06
a
_3 / / i IN I1 I yc
L 7 i ~ i~~ v
sr.w.vroae . ~
tlrE r
73
,nc
st ot (Fri
5 I 8 8 *
I I r s 'ir I /
d?•--: ale i. ? : 0.'.'E ^1C7i / 1
'a a ..0! 0^ Odt 006
= I ssw~ \
I41~ I J=
£ 2 \ ° 009,E
'11~1 .0 61
Vic, A7
777.
Z $ I rll_ I J
M11 1
~i yNmi s'i VM'a' ~ x'1{1 •~I~ F/ p~ '-•i~
u QO~r~0 3 { lifi7! s ~~a
I Lot 3N11 S
C u
s I
SIINr1 3Nv
3oNii 1- 11
N 7 E
La
_ s'QSO- 1N1 e ~ ~ ~I i
a•xp• •~+oa L18 I ; a ~~op/
IWAA
st'os
~ ~i~:s:ti:t~~:~ti S 31 i •I
i~~ ;IIIi1Pl,i 1)i
I
t i
smw
Ili! _l 19
rf ~
r 1 C
fT' f 1.
7"A'i I N 1 I I I I i I T i ~L.
q
,~Q ~ A1i11 =r.
y1Q k E N10GE L AV A00
~ 0 • EM ' ~f~i ' •
P I `
y~ I « 838. FP-7~\jpp~
g BI 840.0
3
i • l • THE OAK .6
--,1 1
6.0 EP GPI
-IA E ( I I 3S %64i
-30
0hu O. . 0A
LIL 2 E 84 o app ios
s$ POST I ! CO.1r •f L.A ' ` Vo
• $g0. III
IfJ.i ~ ~ r \
OP-13 8390 _
e2
76s OP EP-2
es~ O 6 Q d~ 929.8 417914
4
_
P- . 0
3 ~ 676' `
DP- 4 was PNE EA" INDUS
L.f
° e NO. ADO.
•I40~ ow N -
-,pP-20 a~DRE tNC. OPlOtO 100 AOp 0623 HILLS
K//3.O T If ~ 0 9e a T -
cA% 07;
44 - ' amw
L9k•1 \---aass---i~ss
Ti . EP-2. -4
PROJECT SITE
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT
• MAP waftn"mumew yr srwrlolr i....ui • • • .
°1041 OTAl1ol1 ~r . . • • . o j
CITY OF ..OM Fos" NNW -0-0.0
wwon OINe10N
POMO •10.1•AL 4ATt11 LtYei • • $00.0
onur.Aio e~wn~t ~ortt - • • • ...s:sss:s
EAGAN
MEMO
4 4 ity-of eagan
DATE: JUNE 6, 1995
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
,of DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
SUBJECT: PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK POLICY
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
Two issues are before the Commission:
• Review and comment concerning the attached draft policy pertaining to pedestrian
crosswalks.
• Evaluation, prioritization and hierarchical categorization of park and playground
pedestrian crosswalks, on balance with a specific request at Wedgewood and
Wilderness Run Road.
FACTS
• The attached draft Pedestrian Crosswalk policy will be placed on the July 18, 1995 City
Council agenda. The City Council has referred this issue to the Advisory Commission.
• Staff has reviewed park and playground pedestrian crossings with the Director of Public
Works.
• A request has been received by the city for a pedestrian activated flashing light
crosswalk at Wedgewood Lane and the entrance to Walnut Hill Park.
ATTACHMENTS
• Draft Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy
• Memorandum from Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works, analyzing park and
playground pedestrian crosswalk areas.
• Neighborhood request for pedestrian crosswalk at Wedgewood and the entrance to
Walnut Hill Park.
CONTACT
Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation
c4lcrosswrk
MEMO
-city of eagan
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
C/O KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
FROM: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 14,1995
SUBJECT: PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK POLICY & STAFF STUDY
REQUESTED ACTION
The City Council has requested the Advisory Parks, Recreation, & Natural Resource
Commission to:
1. Review the draft Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy and to provide any recommendations
regarding modifications.
2. Review the existing pedestrian crosswalk on Wilderness Run Road @ Wedgewood
Drive connecting the Wedgewood Addition to Walnut Hill Park to determine if a
higher level of pedestrian crossing should be provided beyond the existing
pavement markings and signage. (Location map enclosed.)
BACKGROUND
Very early in the City of Eagan's formative years, a policy decision was made to provide a
community/collector trailway system. Internal neighborhood sidewalks would not be
Installed as a part of this community-wide system.
As collector streets were constructed/improved and major trallway corridors built,
numerous crossings of higher functional classification streets started to occur. The City's
Public Works Department began to provide various types of markings and/or advanced
warning signs at spot locations to help identify the increasing pedestrian use of these
tralllway systems and related crosswalks. However, no formal policy existed as to the type,
location, and/or justification for installing any type of crosswalk markings.
1
J~ ,
In 1993, a study was initiated to evaluate the issue of pedestrian crosswalks which
Incorporated a survey of 13 suburban communities and Dakota County as well as an
evaluation of various crosswalk locations throughout the community. A copy of this
neighboring community survey is enclosed for the Commission's information.
City staff also researched the 18 pedestrian accidents that occurred during 1991-94 for any
common elements.
During 1994-95, the staff did an extensive field survey of all existing crosswalks to
determine the level of markings/signage currently in place. There are over 100 locations
throughout the community where an existing sidewalk/trailway crosses a street that is not
a local residential functional classified street. These crossings include everything from
major signalized intersections with pavement markings to unmarked mid-block crossings.
This draft Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy and Study was presented to the City Council at their
regular meeting of May 15 and approved in a draft concept subject to the APRNRC review
and comments. (A copy of the policy is enclosed.)
ISSUES
The Wedgewood Addition neighborhood south of Wilderness Run Road from Walnut Hill
Park has requested the City Council to provide a higher level of pedestrian crosswalk
beyond the existing pavement marking and advance warning signs at Wedgewood Drive
and Wilderness Run Road. The estimated cost of sign post mounted flashers is
approximately $6-7000 (Table 3). The City Council would like the APRNRC
recommendation regarding any potential criteria for the installation of sign-post mounted
flashers as it pertains to access to City parks. If something higher than pavement marking
and signage is deemed appropriate by the APRNRC proposed criteria, the City Council is
also requesting recommendations regarding financing the additional costs. These can
Include neighborhood special assessments, trail dedication fund, major street fund, general
fund budget, park site acquisition/development fund, etc., or any combination thereof.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The City's Public Works Department met with the Parks & Recreation Department to review
the City's trailway and park system in relationship to potential crosswalk needs. The City's
parks were divided into 2 major categories for pedestrian access evaluation:
• Recreational programs - scheduled pedestrian activity/use
• Playground - unscheduled entertainment purpose
2
/;3 .
Recreational Program Parks
The following parks used for recreational programs are listed with the first 5 in a
descending order of usage and thereafter with no specific order:
1. Ridgecliff Park
2. Muerller Farm Park/Woodland School
3. Northview Park
4. Bridle Ridge Park
5. Walnut Hill Park
• Evergreen Park
• Rahn Park (access from Meadowlands)
• Carnelian Park
• South Oak Park
• Goat Hill Park
• Oak Chase Park
Playground Usage
The following parks have been identified as having significant usage for unscheduled
program/entertainment activities:
• Trapp Farm Park
• Ohmann Park
• Cedar Pond Park
• Quarry Park
• Downing Park/Oak Ridge School
• Slater Acres Park
Other
Other areas/usages were reviewed such as the senior citizen highrise access to Cliff Lake
Center, the Town Center retail area, the Highland Trail access to Cliff Lake Center, etc.
STAFF'S COMMENTS
The staff has not had an opportunity to evaluate the existing 100 + crosswalk locations to
determine which ones should be maintained, upgraded, deleted, etc., in relationship to the
proposed policy guidelines and criteria. Subsequently, staff will not be able to respond
without additional research as to which locations would be affected by any potential policy
modification recommended by the APRNRC. Once the criteria, standards and policy have
been adopted by Council action, an evaluation will be performed estimating the total cost
to bring the community's existing crosswalks into conformity. Dependent upon the method
3
1A A
of financing adopted, a long-range capital improvement program can be prepared for
further review and formal adoption/implementation.
In reviewing this proposed policy with a MnDOT traffic engineer, county traffic engineer,
and consultant engineers, there is significant concern regarding the false perception of
a protectiorf and less use of caution by pedestrians using crosswalks as higher applications
of markings and flashing are provided. While they increase the awareness to the motorist,
It many times causes the pedestrian to take unnecessary risks than they would without any
markings/signage; and yet, a certain degree of crosswalk markings helps to not only alert
the motorist, but direct the pedestrian to a proper crossing location.
SUMMARY
I will be available to discuss this proposed policy and study with the Commission at their
meeting on June 19.
Respectfully submitted,
Director of Public Works
TAC/jJ
Attachments: Policy w/Appendix D
Location Map
CROSSWALKSTUDY/CROSS. POL/JJ
4
~~5
tut'/ _
~ t I~ Ir
~ ~IIt l
III tl
y 14 1i C Z Z; - 0.,
Lij
It I
I \ a ~l II 1~ /l
1 1 W _ M 1
Q
1 ?adrJ ~ 11 II Ili lil ~ it II
It
Ilie
D ~N. co N
? 4'lli it 11
%
Q j~~~ ~ I t!
w
C
lik~ 11 J
v VA
c6 co
All)
4 4 gb~ MEMO
- city of eagan
DATE: JUNE 16, 1995
TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION
FROM: PAULA NOWARIAK, RECREATION SUPERVISOR
DOROTHY PETERSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SUBJECT: BEHAVIOR POLICY - YOUTH PROGRAMS
BACKGROUND:
Following the 1994 summer programs, staff recommended that the Commission
consider adopting a uniform behavior policy for program participants. Staff has
researched other communities and organizations that work with youth to inquire about
their behavior policies. After a great deal of thought and review by staff and the
Recreation Subcommittee, the attached draft of a behavior policy is being presented
for Commission review.
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION:
1. Accept the Behavior Policy as presented so it can be distributed to parents and
participants currently enrolled in summer programs.
PN/DP/KV:cm
BEHAVIOR POLICY
Each child is unique and special. Eacii-Child is entitled t0earn and work in a safe environment.
Therefore, the Parks and Recreation D nent is respp ble for making reasonable rules and
regulations governing participant behavio knd maintaining proper control and
discipline. To ensure this, the department has established clear participant behavior expectations
and supported these expectations with appropriate consequences that are applied consistently.
In the case of a youth program particgi rifthgzl& 4' ors that are unsafe or disruptive so
as to endanger himself/herself or another participant, or iritet ere with successful completion of
the program, the following procedure will be.llQ?wed:
1. The child will be given an explanation by the program leader of his unacceptable
behavior and will be given a warning that includes further consequences if the behavior
continues.
2. If the behavior continues, child will be giver.-:::tube-out. Depending on the behavior, the
following will happen:
a. the child will be placed' i L y from the group.
b. staff will keep an eye on the child
c. after the 5 minute period has elap ed''the'same staff making the initial contact with
the child will ask the child if he its:eady to:ti join the group.
d. staff member must file behavior incident report following instructions completely.
e. staff member will inform parent of action if,the parent comes to the site or with a
phone call.
3. If a child refuses to change hiseaviorii'riing/after the time-out period, a Parks and
Recreation staff member must call the parent with the details.
BEHAVIOR POLICY
PAGE 2
4. If, after the parents have been r~q)if ,ec~:; te:• te#14! r..continues the child will no longer be
allowed to continue in the pro m~~ l is d
• • II be made by the Program Assistant
and the Recreation Supervisor:::: he Program Assis'tai t or Recreation Supervisor will
i~;~1RCision.
contact the parents regarding t6
5. No refund will be given.
This Behavior Policy will be distributed. 43L: ar#isrigants..4 ring the first week of the program.
Parents will be asked to review it with t ieb''Cl i t ti?ri fa re required to explain the policy on
the first day to participants.
BEHAVIOR EXPECTATIONS
1. Respect themselves, other children, staff, facility and supplies/equipment
2. Listen to and follow directions
3. Have fun
4. Positive encouragement to self and others
5. Other - which will be made up by participants of each program
NOTE: This policy is adapted from area Parks:axtd Recreation Departmens and School District
196 Behavior Policy.
COMMENTS:
Are there ways that are more effective to help your child?
Parent Signature
Child Signature Date
DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES
Discipline is a process of positive 4-n.learn what to do and how to relate
to others. It is a positive approach to 'tali g'the~befi' br~;6f children. Disciplinary efforts are to
be as positive as possible and are to iiR#ude recognizing strengthening appropriate behavior.
The goal of discipline is to develop self pntrol, self-estea. ,;.character and orderly conduct.
Xe
If behavior expectations are not followavior Policy information for the proper
procedure.
HINTS ON HOW TO AVOID BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS:
1. Explain rules on the first day have;pacti3 p4.4* p.•fhp.policy.
2. Make sure the parents have signectd ?;f is m:
3. Try to recognize problems before they occur;:;::
4. Make sure daily activities are well planned ,vuith back-d' i•plans in place.
5. Encourage and use participant ideas.
6. Treat all participants equal and coif ceiltt :
7. Use positive reinforcement - ftii trs oit' wante d fiAviors rather than the unwanted ones.
UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIORS:
Include but are not limited to:
'inappropriate language
'hitting or kicking
'disturbing other children
snot following or listening to directigot
'equipment abuse
'facility abuse
'when the behavior takes enjoyment away from others
PROCEDURES:
1. Physical contact in disciplining a child is avQ{tied' unless it is necessary to restrain a child
from harming him/herself or another.
2. In correcting a child's behavior, the staff wili:cplain t#e wanted behavior.
3. Follow Behavior Policy.
cs2Aiehavsta.ff
APRNRC NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday May 31, 1995
-Meeting Summary-
1. Review of Revised Eagan Promenade Development Proposal
(5/19/95 Plans)
Attendees: Lee Markell, APRNRC
Jon Widem, APRNRC
Tom Walkington, APRNRC
Tim Murnane, Opus Development
Greg Frank, MFRA Consultants
Scott Krych, Peterson Environmental
Gregg Hove, City Forester
Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coordinator
Paul Olson, Superintendent of Parks
Discussion Summary:
A. Tree/Woodland Preservation
• Removal of significant trees has been reduced
from 65% under original proposal to 43% under
current proposal.
• Current removal rate meets City's tree
preservation guidelines. However, staff and
the subcommittee are recommending that the
developer change the layout of buildings 3 and
4, and the parking/roadway serving building 5
to save 12 large oak trees (some up to 48" in
diameter).
B. Wetlands
• There are 5.65 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands in 7 basins within the development
site.
• The current development plan would result in
the filling of .51 acres of wetland and
establishment of replacement areas in the
north central portion of the site.
• Subcommittee and staff recommended that the
developer install a retaining wall to
eliminate filling of a portion of the fringe
of Wetland Basin 5 (City pond DP-6.1).
Further, the developer was requested to
install another retaining wall just south of
building 5 to eliminate the need for grading
within 30 feet of the normal water level for
Pond DP-6.1. The developer's representative
responded that they felt the changes proposed
were reasonable, given that it appears they
would not result in any further decrease in
the number of building units.
• With the proposed changes, the subcommittee
felt that the wetland fill proposed was
reasonable for this project and that staff
should proceed with public noticing once a
completed application was received. A 30 foot
wide ungraded and un-maintained buffer
measured back from the normal water level will
be recommended for Pond DP-6.1.
Water quality
• Water quality treatment requirements should be
met primarily with on-site ponding because
runoff from the entire site eventually reaches
LeMay Lake.
• The proposed ponding configuration appears
adequate to meet water quality treatment
requirements for the replacement of Pond DP-4
and for treatment of runoff from the
commercial area of the development, provided
that Pond DP-4.3 is constructed as a two-cell
basin. In addition, the configuration of the
basin should be irregular to create the
appearance of a more natural pond.
• The water quality requirements for the eastern
residential portion of the site can be met
with on-site ponding, supplemented with a cash
dedication if necessary.
Other Issues
• There was a discussion regarding whether the
amount of asphalt coverage could be reduced.
The developer's representative stated that the
parking demands of the tenants has determined
the size of the parking facilities, that they
felt that this parking density was already low
for this type of development, and that the
density could not be reduced further.
• Options were discussed regarding the possible
purchase of the eastern 30 acres of the site
for public open space. The developer's
representative stated that there was nothing
preventing consideration of this option by the
City and that the viability of the commercial
development was not dependent on having a
residential development in this portion of the
site.
2. Meeting with Pond JP-23 Residents
Attendees: See attached list.
Discussion Summary:
• Issues that arose during the discussion included
whether the normal water level in Pond JP-23
could/should be raised or lowered, what measures
the City and the residents could take to protect
water quality in the pond, and the process for
addressing a change in the classification of the
pond from treatment to recreational.
• The residents were requested to contact the Public
Works Department directly, since they are
responsible for evaluating and recommending changes
in the normal water level of ponding areas in the
City's storm drainage system.
• Water resources staff will prepare an evaluation of
the residents request to re-classify the pond to
wildlife habitat designation and submit that
request to the Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resources Commission at a future meeting (most
likely the July, 1995 meeting). A decision on
where this pond fits in the water quality plan's
list of long-term enhancement priorities will be
taken up during the over-all review of the plan
this year.
• A cooperative education effort between the City and
watershed residents should begin immediately. The
City will supply catch basin stenciling kits and
supplies, take, and pay for up to 20 lawn soil
tests, and supply brochures if residents are
willing to carry out the stenciling, identify yards
for soil testing, and distribute brochures. Staff
also requested that one resident volunteer to
participate in the Citizen Lake Monitoring Program
for Pond JP-23.
Meeting summary prepared by R. Brasch on June 2, 1995.
/ ~3,
(2 j f2
`rer•_ ~ Z.. Sit 3 Co ve,4j V h,
KTtt _ S Ccv~e.~
Co see^&
n1 39 ig
Sit
_ W_11.~•~4M ~~(,.4rt.THY 39 34 TN&MstS Awe 71r~s C-S. 0
.
4
MEMO TO: Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Gregg Hove, Supervisor of Forestry
DATE: Upcoming Natural Resource Inventory Projects
SUBJECT: June 6, 1995
In an effort to gain a better understanding of the City of Eagan's natural resource base, two
associated projects are currently in the planning and will begin in the very near future. This
memo is written to provide you with a brief overview of these two project descriptions, goals
and time frames.
PROTECT A
CITY OF EAGAN BOULEVARD TREE INVENTORY
Introduction
Trees improve nearly every aspect of our lives, from the parks and boulevards we recreate
in and treavel through to the air we breathe. Cooler urban climates, nutrient rich soil,
cleaner air, fresher water, pleasant surroundings - are all created in part by trees.
Research has shown that urban trees benefit communities economically, socially and
environmentally. But, trees in urban environments face harsh growing conditions - including
compacted soils, decreased nutrients and water availability, vandalism, and sometimes
limited growing space. "Healthy trees" are much better able to withstand these pressures
and return benefits to the community.
As a result, it is critical that trees in urban environments receive proper maintenance and
care to provide maximum benefits to the community. A systematic, comprehensive
municipal tree program can lead to a healthy urban forest that all citizens can enjoy and
benefit from. A first, critical step with any management plan is to find out what resources
are available. In other words, perform an inventory.
Project Description
The Forestry division has applied for and recently received matching grant funding through
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) and Urban and Community
Challenge Grant Program to perform a thorough inventory of the city's boulevard trees.
The project is a cooperative project between the city's Forestry division and Street
department with desired benefits being derived from both parties. The field inventory itself
will be performed by a summer/fall intern.
Once collected, data will be stored, managed and utilized through a computerized database.
Information will be available from the database to accomplish a variety of needs including:
to provide an accurate profile of species which will identify priorities to assure balance and
diversity; to identify hazard trees which require treatment; to determine general tree
maintenance needs reinforcing budget requests; to enhance record keeping of work
performed; and to provide factual responses to both city residents and city staff within other
departments.
The inventory process will also provide for the input of specific tree data location to be
imported into the city's Geographic Information System (GIS) to further enhance future
management tasks.
Project Time Frame
Data will be collected during June, July and August. Initial report summary will take place
during August/September. GIS digitizing is scheduled to be performed during September.
Final reports and presentation of derived management plans will be completed by October,
1995.
PROJECT B
ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT PROJECT
Introduction
The Forestry division has recently been approached by the MnDNR as a possible location
for a "Ecosystem Based Management Project" (EBMP). This project is being funded by
both Federal and State dollars and will be performed in only three communities in the
"metro region". The three ecosystems (eco-regions) to be analyzed and their respective
study sites are:
1) The Big Woods - Watertown, MN
2) Anoka Sand Plan - Robbinsdale, MN
3) Oak Savannah - Eagan, MN
Project Description
The purpose of the project will be to demonstrate the applicability and importance of eco-
region based landscapes and how these can be applied at the community level. This project
is now in its very early stages of development. However, an initial meeting has taken place
between city staff and the MnDNR which set the table and identified general procedures
and objectives.
/34.,
The end result of this eighteen-month project will be a written document, basically a long-
term management plan, involving all aspects of Eagan's ecosystem components. General
goals of the EMBP will be to:
• Identify available natural resources
• Provide direction to maintain a healthy ecosystem
• Maintain networks of natural resources and interconnecting habitats to
maximize healthy ecological functions
• To provide information needed to protect, restore, and manage existing
natural resources
• To not only examine Eagan's natural resources on a local city scale, but also
to place and study our resources on a regional scale. The actions that take
place within our city can and do affect surrounding communities and vice-
versa. (See attached Sun Current column copy)
• To determine a methodology and "standard operating procedure" for future
planning efforts and share the information with other communities, states and
interested parties.
To accomplish these goals, the MnDNR will utilize information and expertise from many
disciplines within their organization. A part of the needed information will be provided by
city staff, such as data collected during the current boulevard tree inventory project. Time
and staff commitments from within the city will be minimal, with the majority of project as
well as follow-up plan preparation and presentation being performed by MnDNR staff.
More information will be provided as this Ecosystem Based Management Project proceeds.
Gregg Hov , pervisor of Forestry
cc: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
Arnie Erhart, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment
Paul Olson, Superintendent of Parks
Tom Struve, Supervisor of Streets
enc.
c\1pm\ec tm.1S8
Date: March 1, 1995
To: Lori Haugen, Sun Current Editor
From: Gregg Hove, Supervisor of Forestry, City of Eagan
Subject: February 1995 Column, Understanding Urban Ecosystem Management
Ecosystem, is a recent "buzz word" in the land management business. But what exactly
is an ecosystem and how do activities which take place within it affect those of us who
live in a suburban setting. A good definition of ecosystem is given by Oliver Owen in his
book Natural Resource Conservation. An Ecological Approach. He writes, a community
of organisms operates in an environment. The environment we live in is comprised of
both living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic) parts. This community of organisms can and
does cause changes on the environment, and in turn the environment has an effect on
these organisms within the community. Ecologists refer to the "community plus the
environment with which it interacts" as an ecological system or ecosystem.
In general, every action or change within an ecosystem begins a domino effect, somehow
affecting many, if not all the organisms within the ecosystem. This concept is discussed
in great detail in the latest issue of American Forests, a publication provided by the
American Forestry Association. Here the author writes about the "ecological unit" as a
community where plants and animals (including the human animal) share the same
environment. This community involves both social and biological conditions. He
describes further the inner workings of the ecosystem and the links that connect its
elements. One of the most prominent links, he states, is the one between people and the
environment.
To make this concept of an inter-related ecosystem clearer the author uses the analogy
of two people playing a game of chess. However they are not playing on an ordinary
chess board. The ecosystem chessboard not only has squares laid out in a connected
grid pattern, but it is also complicated by the fact it includes many layers appearing in
three dimensional form. And the layers are not the standard black and white squares, but
in fact are moving patterns of a living landscape. A blue layer includes water in the form
of lakes, rivers and streams, another green layer shows the vegetation of trees, shrubs
and grasslands, another gray layer includes structures such as buildings and roads, still
another shows elements of the air such as clouds and smog. As the chess game begins
you move your first game piece, however it is not a pawn or rook, your game pieces are
people, each which a has a different objective or reason for wanting to move.
The important thing to remember as you play is that each move you make will trigger
some combination of moves affecting all of the other pieces. The game is made even
more confusing when you realize that the rules about these "triggered combinations" are
very vague. There is no way to precisely determine how your move will affect any of the
layers. As you move from one layer to another, your move not only affects the layer you
lane on, but also every inter-related layer. However, an important rule is relayed to you.
You are told "not to only get lost in the details of the game; keep your mind on the game
as a whole". After playing for a little while you begin to get a better understanding of how
your moves can affect the changing landscape. We are reminded that all the layers we
are playing on are connected and if the game board were collapsed down, the game is
again played on one very busy board. As the game board is collapsed we begin to see
all the blue and green colors as well as the pieces blend into a colorful, active landscape.
The author of this American Forests article closes with well written summary which I would
like to borrow. As the games closes your partner looks straight at you and says, We are
not opponents; we are partners. We play as a team. We challenge the board. We try to
keep the greens green, and the blues blue." Suddenly you understand. This is not a
game after all, it is actually land use planning. Our actions are important. What we do
today with our game pieces will somehow affect the entire landscape. Our ecosystem
can remain intact and pure if we make our move our pieces wisely. It becomes very clear
that this particular "chess game" is one to be taken very seriously.
/ 4