Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
08/14/1995 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Monday, August 14, 1995 7:00 PM Blackhawk Middle School A. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting B. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:02 pm C. Approval of Agenda 7:03 pm D. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 17, 1995 7:05 pm E. Visitors to be Heard 7:07 pm F. Department Happenings Page 3 7:08 pm G. Consent Agenda (1) Preusse Addition - Gregory Preusse Pages 5-16 7:13 pm H. Development Proposals (1) Blue Cross Blue Shield Pages 17-36 7:15 pm (2) Easter Lutheran Church Pages 37-56 7:30 pm 1. Old Business (1) Legislative Mandate for New Development Process 7:45 pm (2) Holz Farm Update Pages 57-70 7:50 pm (3) Acquisition of Property (NW of North Park) 8:10 pm J. New Business (1) Pedestrian Crosswalk Study - Amy Sievers Pages 71-93 8:20 pm K. Parks Development Update 8:35 pm (1) Blackhawk Park Shelter L. Water Resources Update 8:45 pm M. Other Business and Reports N. Round Table 8:55 pm 0. Adjournment 9:00 pm The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status , sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the events. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City will make every attempt to provide the aids. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING MEETING - CAPITAL NEEDS WORK SESSION MEMO city of eagan DATE: AUGUST 10, 1995 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: AUGUST 14 ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING The regular Commission Meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. at Blackhawk Middle School. This month's agenda appears to be relatively light, which will provide us an opportunity to schedule a capital needs work session Immediately following the conclusion of the regular agenda. Rather than a parks tour, the Commission Members are asked to drive through Thomas Lake Park parking lot and view the mowing lines on maintained areas. Staff would like to briefly discuss a recent complaint and call relative to this area. Because of the small print on the plan reductions within the packet, Commission Members may wish to arrive a few minutes early to review a larger set of the plans. Perhaps by starting at our regular time, this will also allow you to be fresh throughout the meeting to be able to focus on the first of a series of work sessions on capital needs. After the Department Happenings, there's only one item under the Consent Agenda. This item is contained within the packet. Under Development Proposals, Blue Cross Blue Shield is for the development of the property known as River Place. This is the old Comserv property which Blue Cross Blue Shield has now acquired. The second item is Easter Lutheran Church. The church has submitted a Planned Unit Development proposal which would allow the Church to move ahead to acquire the property with some assurances that they would be able to develop it at some future date. The church would then be required to move through a development review process with each phase of the PUD. Old Business There are three items under Old Business. Upon further review by the Community Development Department, it does not appear there will be the need for major overhaul of the development process that is currently in place. It does mean however, that there will be less time for staff to react to some of the proposals when they are submitted to the City. Senior Planner Mike Ridley will be available at the Advisory Commission meeting to respond to any questions relative to the new statues. I The second item under Old Business is the Holz Farm update. Project Coordinator Jon Oyanagi, who has been working with the Holz Farm Task Force, will update the Advisory Commission on their work. Enclosed is a report and recommendation for action relative to the Holz Farm property. The final item under Old Business is the acquisition of property on the northwest comer of North Park. Staff has concluded negotiations with the eventual property owner for the acquisition of four lots and a trailway easement . This will be a verbal presentation and staff will be looking for concurrence and final recommendation to acquire this land and trail easement. New Business Amy Sievers, a student intern with the Department over the last several weeks, has performed a pedestrian crosswalk study as part of the City's overall crosswalk program. The Advisory Commission reviewed this issue several months ago recommending that we try to 'define parks as a separate classification for crosswalks. Amy undertook a survey of several crosswalks accessing parks to see if there are any potential problems or if there was a strong rational for defining parks separately for crosswalk locations. Amy will make her presentation, which is part of her responsibility as a student intern, to the Advisory Commission. Parks Development Update Staff will update the Advisory Commission on the status of the Blackhawk Park Shelter Building, which is now entering its early development phases. This project was originally scheduled for 1994 and then postponed to 1995. Work is progressing with architect Dick Schwartz. We are hopeful that a final design can be prepared for review by the Commission in September or October for bidding yet this year. Following the Parks Development Update, Water Resources Update and Other Business and Reports any Round Table discussion is in order. Prior to adjournment, staff would like to establish a meeting for later in August or early September for the second capital needs work session. Staff would also like to alert the Advisory Commission to reserve the weekend of September 30 - October 1 for the Civic Arena Grand Opening. Although plans have not been finalized for this opening event, this weekend has been targeted for the ribbon cutting and dedication of the new facility. As is always the case, if members of the Advisory Commission are not able to make the regular meeting of the Commission, please contact the Department staff to let us know of your absence. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation cs4/commmt9.kv Department Happenings 1. National Youth Sports Coaching Association Certification Clinics are set for football and soccer on August 15 and 16. All three levels of clinics will be offered to EAA sports coaches. 2. Department staff have been actively involved with planning the MRPA State Conference scheduled for November 1-3 in St. Cloud. A series of meetings are scheduled to continue throughout the fall. 3. The Youth Development Junior Program was successful in being awarded Community Development Block Grant funding. This $5,000 grant will enable the program to broaden the scope of experiences for the 6-12 year old age group at Wescott. 4. Three summer programs did not meet revenue projections. Golf: The lesson program continues to have the disadvantage of no local driving range facility. The Troon Golf Learning Center in Savage is an excellent facility however, it is just too far away. If the lessons were offered locally, preferably in a golf course setting, participation would conceivable return to maximum capacity. Playwagon: This activity just missed revenue projections which were based on 100 participants. Ninety children were registered. Teens: Each summer is an adventure as to what the young teen response will be to activities, even when they have input during the planning process. Numbers of participants were smaller than a year ago. 5. Potentially, EAA Travel Fastpitch will host a 4 week fall league at Northview Athletic Fields. The Department would provide concessions for this Sunday afternoon activity. The EAA director of softball will know whether the league will be formed within a week or two. 6. Recreation staff are gearing up for planning for fall. August programs are occurring simultaneously making for limited planning time. 7. Twenty-five Eagan Seniors are slated to attend a trip to Red Wing on August 9. The trip will feature lunch at the St. James Hotel and shopping at the Pottery. Place. 8. The quarterly City/school meeting will be held on August 9. Parks and Recreation staff meet with School District 196 administrative and buildings and grounds personnel to coordinate facility maintenance construction projects. Community usage of school facilities and school use of City facilities. 9. Special sessions of tennis lessons were provided to youth from Wescott. Rackets purchased from last years USIA Grant were used for this activity. 10. Staff continue to be involved with the School District 196 family services collaborative. The school district received a grant from Dakota County Human Services for local level assistance to families. The current meetings involve discussions on process and procedures for access and utilization of the funds. cs4lbappenin.gs CONSENT AGENDA f" PRUESSE ADDITION - GREGORY L. PREUSSE Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 14, 1995 FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION: 1. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication. 2. This development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 3. The grading plan shall be revised to illustrate grading impacts and proposed tree/woodland protection measures. 4. This development shall be responsible for a cash water quality dedication. 5. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on site. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 1, 1995 CASE: 19-PP-25-6-95 APPLICANT: Gregory L. Preusse HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Preusse Addition) LOCATION: 4141 Old Sibley Memorial Highway COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Industrial (LI) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Gregory Preusse is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots on 3 acres (PID# 10-01900-011-51) located north of Diffley Road, east of Highway 13, and south of Sibley Court on the west side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway in the SW 1/4 of Section 19. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. S. Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. 1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property is unplatted. The parcel had direct access to Sibley Memorial Highway prior to the realignment associated with the upgrading of Cedar Avenue. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site contains a home that was built in the 1950's and was recently converted to an office. The structure is currently being used as an accounting office. The majority of the site contains a large woodland massing and the topography of the site is severe. The site grade falls sixty feet from the high point in the southeast corner of the site to the low point at the northernmost point of the site. (0. Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 3 Proposed Lot 1 contains minimal grade change. The development of Lot 2 will require a substantial amount of grading to prepare a buildable area for a building and parking lot. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Undeveloped and a Mini-storage facility; zoned and designated Industrial. South - Group W cable; zoned Industrial; designated General Business East - Northern Natural Gas Co.; zoned Planned Development; and designated Industrial. West - Undeveloped; zoned and designated Industrial. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant has incorporated a 50' strip of City right-of-way within the plat boundary. The applicant has petitioned for this right-of-way to be vacated but the City has yet to act on the vacation request. It appears a substantial amount of grading will be necessary prepare Lot 2 for development. The proposed two lot subdivision will create one developed parcel currently used for office space (Lot 1) and one undeveloped parcel (Lot 2). The applicant is uncertain if he will develop Lot 2 or sell it to another developer. Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The applicant is not proposing a specific development at this time; however, uses permitted within the Limited Industrial Zoning District should be compatible with existing and future land uses in the area. Mr. Preusse has provided a conceptual design for a 9,000 SF building Lots - The applicant is proposing Lot 1 to be a 0.5 acre lot and Lot 2 to be a 2.5 acre lot. Each lot meets the minimum size and width requirements of the LI zoning district. Grading/ Wetlands - The topography of lot 2 is steep and will be difficult to develop. The applicant has not provided grading impacts or limits on the grading plan and therefore, it is unclear what impact the conceptual building and associated grading will have on the site. The applicant shall revise the grading plan, prior to final approval by the City Council, to include grading limits, plans and specifications for proposed retaining walls, and erosion control information. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on site. Storm Drainage/Water Quality - Revisions are necessary to the storm drainage plan. Storm water run-off from the building and parking area of Lot 2 should be directed by a storm sewer system away from the slope to the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. 7 Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 4 The topography of the site prohibits any on-site ponding and as such, staff is recommending a cash water quality dedication to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission (APRNRC). Utilities - Minor modifications are necessary to the utility plan. Sanitary sewer and watermain are located along the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. The sanitary sewer elevation is sufficient to serve the first floor elevations; however, the basement floor sanitary sewer service will have to be pumped to the main. The proposed water main layout for individual water service and hydrant for fire protection is acceptable. The sewer and water extensions to serve this site will require street removal and replacement for a portion of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. Sections removed should be replaced with the same material that presently exists. Access - The site currently has one access from Old Sibley Memorial Highway and the applicant is proposing one additional access point also from Old Sibley Memorial Highway and widening the existing access to act as a shared access for both lots. Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - The applicant has petitioned the City to vacate 50' of right-of- way along Old Sibley Memorial Highway. This request is being reviewed. Tree Preservation - According to the plans submitted, the applicant will not be removing any significant trees or woodlands; however, the plans submitted do not provide grading limits or tree protection measures. Mr. Preusse should revise the grading plan to illustrate grading impacts and proposed tree/woodland protection measures. Dedications - The developer will be responsible for a cash park and trail dedication. Site Plan - The applicant has prepared a site plan that also incorporates a 50' wide strip of City right-of-way that has not been vacated. The plan shows the existing building on Lot 1 and a conceptual building on Lot 2. Setbacks - The existing building and parking lot on Lot 1 will meet all LI setback requirements regardless of whether or not the previously mentioned right-of-way is vacated. The conceptual building design on Lot 2 will not meet building setback requirements if the right-of-way is not vacated. The parking and drive aisle design for Lot 2 (including the proposed right-of-way to be vacated) does not meet the 20' setback from public right-of-way. The ultimate development plan will have to meet all setback requirements. Parking - The existing parking area for the office building on Lot 1 meets Code required parking. Because the ultimate land use of Lot 2 is not known, parking requirements cannot be determined at this time. The ultimate development plan will have to meet all on-site parking requirements. Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 5 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant has not identified a specific user for Lot 2; however, the topography of the site limits the area available for future development. Permitted uses in the LI district should be compatible with existing and future development in this area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny the Preusse Addition Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots on 3 acres. Approval subject to the conditions listed below: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C4, D1, E1, F1, Gi, and Hi. 2. The applicant shall plat the property. Grading 3. The applicant shall submit an erosion control plan prior to Council action on the final subdivision 4. The applicant shall provide plans and specifications for all retaining walls to be constructed. 5. The applicant shall submit a revised grading plan prior to Council action on the final subdivision. Utilities 6. Storm water run-off generated by the building and parking area of Lot 2 shall be directed, by storm sewer, to the ditch on the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. 7. The applicant shall restore the removed section of Old Sibley Memorial Highway needed for utility connections. The replacement shall be with the same materials that presently exist including a concrete pavement base. V 3400 , AVER c ~S0t P cg`s 36001---------18--~~ 17- >='ci - N ~ KYLLO - ? g I i fC HAZEL ISS' a RD. I J,,.,b - ~eee - - _ _ _ SLVER BELL SILVER BELL Ill. MGM ~ N ~ -PARK..' o ~ o K~+ l V p.E 0E' ~ 4000 3~ - 7 t ;DDEEEI EY LA. R TAO • y~j H . r1 ARNEI ~,~y• A 4 ~ ~ r PAI t~,. Dr 1. i U W CED POI~M C ZIRCON lA ~ ct. o V ct. ~ - DIFFLEY RD. RK CORAL LA. CT. 65 t T ~ A GL M DR TC S lj ` E + O~ LLS w HI RIVER g PARK A P T < CAN A I CEDAR x ~ ~ O CIR a v LE ARK W E jAIc .~1 O 1 [ wl N 7~ 4400 ~ N (3 IFFVFW LOCATION /d• ire! L1 AJ' CSC~`q- 0 `,tgtp A R-4 ZONING L_ R I C 1 Fi Gam` - I-1 (Limited Industrial) PC- JUNIOR N8 N8 B-2 st:»oot c~ c(• a' R 3c f IND Ck COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN IND 04 IND (Industrial) CPO GS toil, 0.111 R8 Pf p PF Pf N8 Pf 0-1 P 0-11 G8 LB P PRELUMIMARY PLAT OF: PREUSSE ADDITION f rr r~ aeoafr 1i7 / W' ~ . ~ 7 ~ ~ MA i ~ f .J7~' ~ 1~ ~ _~'-mfr 'w. ~ ~a-• e~ - /r r~ ! ~'s~~ s~ lip it rrrrrr• r ~ s~. o t SMU 7 M St A. '~~ii/iiS ~%~~/:G~~/$'•~.~~ • . !r i °r"' asw ~a w r».~s+r~ ..R s...wa"s~ ~a.e ew f r / + i % ~ ti~ .r!!. rj: e a reT~ Ma ~ laws ass s_ rrr*.. r. rr wrwr..r..r lr t+~*wrrss s rrr t ew...erw nwt.•rJ. OWL a ~i `L rMr 7c.r.rr u~..rr-•..r s w+~r Ilk • / ~ 1 ~ ~ 4.,~ ~~rstw..:ts.,,, . , I r.rr.." MW@.e.r MM-W* k • ...+n.rw - % / • + '/i ~=i' ~i~ • r!J /•f•a r+ i iwii.+r air .r .-j~'s ` i tib.' rtrt.wrw.sar.~n.rttr.te•ar ~ • ~i// is t • ~ i:rs.,r ~ s.... T. r 1 'M i/r/a//a~ ''1• ..w {,J~~ s/f tters.s wrw . •w wrsi.~a ' \ j Or,. . ~/i Ia~ii/I N , - / i. 0as ..~i.~ .ir`w wra~ Mrr \ ~ • a•1 j.J~ ` / ar./•i. O.r. r...ttatVr~~.w- • awrur [ 't'om' 'i =f~ alpit r J~~.•.'.~i.~wrsl ew•.+wt•~.~MW ~.r w .r.+M.t•-.? ~ ~ ~S~p~J~ar~'~ ~/i Ipt~d IIRJ ~•i/j ,I• ,af/ weM.•~wa w ew...s..er.arrr t ~i•+s era •pli7~ ! J wNn.. 1 , f +et/a • - arw A. ...s.AltAi.. Gms tr w.t.rri.rrs. NArwsr.r s ~S . i i a 1 I yt ara. rr..•w r wp w..r UlL:~ p ft" ~'JI ' f•~s.+y,a__•••~~~~~~ip~' + j a r w" f ~ iw ~++pa.wr.wr er ti th r ~i Ji' - ~ J? 4v~ww.~un ww_~w norms 1t..+.rra.r.•~.. ~+rrr1..Y.M..r lw /t y~yrty.Orr w.wrer s~af /\J`//w' .r •.nwt.~r~..A.rib car or~.rs .fir w..rr..r.rww~~~.•n- r_ •...w ..w .w ;"*A am L am wo Snow L rr W, r rA~ ur... r~ J.. 1 .r•1 Wrt .la/ s . /f - !L!°~ aft p.• ~.w f / / Y i.ti. 4 .w/. * . ..'a talc ~J ApIY~MPHbrnw.~r..A/r~Obir 0~. a~ IL now Z.1 egoism" LC. F NW AN.aM Ar M+0 ON. 700 I 's~ 9-7a 9br! 9lpA SITE PLAN FOR I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: f PREUSSE ADDITION 'AVAW r J I-T I r.woi. F es~l a.~. A... ew. q ~r ~...w«¦ r.n _ rya i r•r .~.rwrr.r • r.e i • w y !ry~r r~+rr`~_r5i"ai www.i 'r.r~-rr ft-aft ~ • r wo.nW ft-Aft • ~ ~wwr ~ ~~r_. w.~.~ Mrr 70i• ; _ ! ?r rr.w r..rw.r r~w~rr.~or• MIX w•« /+•rrrlrtir Mwrw~ rrapry? r / iiwrRTrr rAwwr w • wwr *~~wr=g/E ff r!••.•tbrr rr «..rti WAloft r~~~errr•~/• Aw ~yMNr rl•~ _ 7••r N~NI?r r•rrr / wir •4iw.. wi..wi~irr~~ ~r r.wn~ w•~iw.ra~ "w'r r ~.~wr~rr r~'~ .wr rr r r wrw r ~~y rr M ~~~~r r/r.t Air M ~~ry o : • A~ ~r 7~M1•IL i w..,. N r r• r..r~w • ! r•e~tirw.r.rwr•~ .mow / •y.TwNr M. ilt~ ~Mrr~ Yl~r+p l . I wp=_ rrrr ~ri4.~it mom 74110 r7f~r•At Y.k a WU a.-.r _Ja' L JZ 7.1 _.TJ • ~P Lnunh • I r F -nI_ -F r LTXC ni/I i i i i t v i r n I - .v . I I c~c+~• clw I ink 11111i oil oil P p i g~='a• A S ? i{ki hit 111,11i I 'k NN N ell LI: y ifyr+t y ti r i 00 P-4 L6 ra Z a. Li w w <V}CL GRna. • ~ . ail . r•11~-wlMr y ¦ ink 1.1 I-"'', •~f c ! .Il r J ji • ~ails '~i ~ mill l~a ~1 1.~,t~~i, , ls#!tititt~,r,tt . % rL CL O'S _j W I \1 ax, LAJ Z w 0 U. lair, u ~ +yNao `~~c air i1 1 ~jf1 RIVER PARK OFFICE CENTER - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 14, 1995 FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION: 1. This development is responsible for a cash parks dedication for the 11 acres added to the plat based on the parks dedication fee at the time of the final plat. 2. This development is responsible for a cash trails dedication for the 11 acres added to this plat. 3. This development will be required to plant 5 category B trees as mitigation for significant tree/woodland removal exceeding the 47.5% woodland removal exceeding the 47.5% woodland loss. 4. The development shall meet it's water quality treatment requirements via on- site ponding through the expansion of pond CP-7. 5. The developer shall be required to incorporate on-site ponding to fully meet water quality treatment requirements for the possible parking lot to be built on Parcel 4. The pond size and design should be approved by the water resources coordinator prior to issuance of a grading permit for this portion of the site by the City. 6. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development site which will be filled or drained. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 1, 1995 CASE: 17/8-PP-24-6-95 APPLICANT: Blue Cross Blue Shield HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision (RiverPark Office Center) LOCATION: 3400 Yankee Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Limited Industrial (LI) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc. (BCBS) is requesting approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to permit the addition of four new 100,000 SF office buildings on 52.5 acres and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 6 lots on 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road in the south 1/2 of Section 8 and the north 1/2 of Section 17. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 2 D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, 'shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 3 plans; (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The site contains the four story, 190,787 SF, RiverPark office building (formerly Comserv Realty Corporation headquarters) that was completed in 1983. The 62.6 acre Comserv No. 1 subdivision was approved by the City in July 1982. The subdivision created a 41.1 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 1), and a 21.5 acre outlot (Outlot A). The outlot, which was ultimately separated from Lot 1, Block 1, Comserv No. I by Yankee Drive (formerly Comserv Drive), was re-platted in 1986 as Lot 1, Block 1, R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition. Dun & Bradstreet Software Services (D&B) acquired the building and 41 acre site from Comserv in 1988. In 1990, D&B acquired an additional 11.4 acres between Lot 1, Block 1, Comserv No. 1 and the railroad right-of-way which results in the total site size of 52.5 acres. BCBS began subleasing parts of the office building in 1992 and purchased the building and site in March of 1995. BCBS has been located in Eagan since 1970 and currently employs approximately 3,000 people. The original 200,000 SF main building located at 3535 Blue Cross Road was completed in 1970. Expansions to this building have occurred since that time to bring the total square footage of this building to approximately 400,000. BCBS presently occupies 800,000 - 900,000 square feet in Eagan which includes the original building, the RiverPark building, the ten-story office building at 1200 Yankee Doodle Road, and leased space at 1305 Corporate Center Drive. EXISTING CONDITIONS BCBS has 550 employees working at the existing RiverPark office facility. The entire site has previously been graded and generally has a gently rolling topography that includes an elevation change of 70' from the high point at the southern tip to the low point along the northwesterly edge of the site. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Transport America/Gressor Masonry; zoned and designated Industrial. South - Office-showroom/Undeveloped; zoned and designated Industrial. East - Office-showroom/Best Brands; zoned and designated Industrial. Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 4 West - Railroad Right-of-way/Flood Plain; zoned and designated Park. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Because the proposed building expansion exceeds 300,000 SF, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) must be prepared for review and approval by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Additionally, because the total required parking for the proposed expansion exceeds 2000 parking spaces, an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) will also require review and approval by the MPCA. The City cannot give Final approval of this subdivision until the EAW and ISP have been approved by MPCA. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Preliminary Planned Development Long range planning performed by BCBS has identified the need for expansion at this site. In addition to the existing 190,787 SF office building, BCBS is proposing to develop four additional 100,000 SF office buildings. Each building will be occupied by BCBS employees or by employees of a BCBS subsidiary. The expansion will be phased over several years and result in over 1,000 additional employees at this location. The development plan shows three new buildings between the existing office and Yankee Doodle Road and one on the south side of the existing office. All buildings will be interconnected via a second-story "skyway". The additional parking can be accommodated by extending the existing parking lot in a logical fashion to the northeast and southeast. This expansion will keep the parking in a centralized area as opposed to providing individual parking lots for each new building. BCBS is proposing a planned development and subdivision that will create a situation where each building footprint (existing and proposed) will be platted as a separate lot and a sixth lot will be platted that surrounds the other five. The sixth lot will be common space supporting each of the buildings by providing access and parking. Compatibili with Surrounding Area - The proposed rezoning from Limited Industrial to Planned Development and Preliminary Planned Development permitting a phased office park development will be an expansion of an existing use that has been operating for over ten years that will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area. Lots - The lots containing buildings (Lots 1-5) will only be the approximate size of the that particular building footprint ranging in size from .93 - 2.1 acres, while Lot 6 will be 46.5 acres. The subdivision design will result in each building exceeding the maximum lot coverage allowed of 35% for lots 1-5; however, a more accurate measure of building to lot intensity is the Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 5 aggregate building lot coverage of the entire planned development, which is only 11%. Setbacks - As with lot coverage, the subdivision design will not allow standard building to lot line setbacks to be met for Lots 1-5, however, all building and parking setbacks will exceed standard setback requirements from the property boundary line. Term - The anticipated buildout provides for occupancy of the fourth and final new building in 2002; however, market forces will play a role in the development of each phase. Because of this uncertainty, BCBS is proposing a 15 year term for the RiverPark Office Center Planned Development. Parking - The are 717 - 10' wide parking stalls currently on site. In an effort to minimize the amount of impervious surface and because their daily office parking has little, if any, turn-over, BCBS is proposing to provide 9' wide stalls for the existing building (through restriping) and all future parking to be constructed. The City Code requires on-site parking for office uses at the rate of one parking stall for each 150 SF of net leasable office space. Net leasable has been interpreted by staff to be defined as 80% of the gross floor area. When the site is built out there will be a net office space square footage of 472,600 SF which requires 3,151 parking spaces. BCBS has analyzed their current and anticipated parking needs for this site and have determined that their parking needs calculate to one parking space for every 278 SF of net office space and, as such, they are proposing to construct parking at that rate which will total 1,751 spaces, which is a difference of 1,400 spaces from the Code required parking; however, BCBS has designated the 10+ acres along the northwestern edge of the site as a "proof of parking" area that could be developed for over 1,400 parking spaces if needed . Architecture - BCBS has not finalized the exterior building materials to be used for each new office building; however, their intent is to insure that all structures will be architecturally compatible. Architectural guidelines will need to be established when Phase 1 is finalized and will carry over to subsequent phases. Landscaping - The preliminary Landscape Plan is acceptable. The plan provides a continuation of previously established landscaping theme. The Final Landscape Plan will have to detail the specific size and type of materials to be provided and all materials shall meet City Code minimum size requirements. Sig_nage - BCBS should provide an overall sign plan that includes all proposed building, monument, and directional signage. Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 6 Preliminary Subdivision Grading Wetlands - With some modifications, the preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The existing storm water pond (CP-7) located on site should be expanded to meet flood volume and outflow requirements of the entire drainage district in accordance with the City's Storm Water Management Plan. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development site which will be filled or drained. Storm Drainage/Water Quality - With some modifications, the preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. The storm sewer layout should be revised to include additional catch basins and storm sewer to handle run-off from the expanded parking areas. The City's Storm Water Management Plan recommends construction of a 48" trunk storm sewer pipe from the northwest edge of this site to Pond CP-8. If the need for constructing the proof of parking area is ever realized, the developer may petition the City to construct this pipe as a public improvement. Storm water from two-thirds of the site (which includes all improved areas) drains through two storm water basins, first to CP-7 (located on the RiverPark site), which discharges to CP- 8 before discharging into CP- 9, a 45-foot deep flooded gravel pit located in Ft. Snelling State Park which has been recommended for re-assignment to a "recreational" classification by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission (APRNRC). The addition of four buildings and expansion of the existing parking lot will approximately double the area of impervious coverage on the 34 acres draining to CP-7. Also, the western edge of the site designated as "proof of parking" for 1,400 spaces will result in a high impervious coverage in that area, if developed. The developer has provided a water quality pond to serve this proof of parking area. If the proof of parking area is constructed, the design of this pond must meet NURP standards. Because of the increase in impervious surface and associated run off to CP-7, the City's Water Resource Coordinator is recommending to the APRNRC that BCBS meet it's water quality treatment requirements with on-site ponding by expanding CP-7. BCBS would prefer to pay a cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site treatment so they can maximize the use of the 55 acre site. Utilities - Minor revisions are necessary to the preliminary utility layout. Sufficient sanitary sewer and water main service is available to serve this site. The applicant should construct a manhole over the proposed sanitary sewer service lines. .4 1 Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 7 The proposed water main extension alignment from Terminal Drive to the Yankee Doodle Road cul-de-sac should be moved from the City's right-of-way onto BCBS property. Access/Street Design - The proposed access plan is acceptable. The site is currently served by two access points, both from Yankee Drive. The developer is proposing three new access locations to the site; two from Yankee Doodle Road and one from Kennebec Drive. The two new access locations on Yankee Doodle Road will require the upgrading and reconfiguration of Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive to the north. The existing parking island in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive along with the striped parking area along the north side of Yankee Doodle Road adjacent to the property in the northwest corner of that intersection will need to be removed to provide a full 44 foot wide access street along the east side of the development. A condition of Preliminary Subdivision approval for Transport America (located at the northwest intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive) required the removal of the striped angled parking that exists in the Yankee Doodle Road right-of-way. The Final Subdivision for Transport America is pending and they will be responsible for removing the parking stall striping from the street. Kennebec Drive is proposed to be extended from Blackhawk Road within existing City right-of- way and terminate at a cul-de-sac on the west end of the site. The applicant will be financially responsible for the upgrading and reconfiguration of Yankee Doodle Road and the extension of Kennebec Drive to serve the development. Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - BCBS should dedicate a 60 foot radius right-of-way for the construction of the proposed Kennebec Drive cul-de-sac within their site. Tree Preservation - The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable. The proposed development will result in the removal of approximately 48% of the existing woodlands on site while none of the significant trees will be lost. The Tree Preservation Guidelines allow for the two-phase woodland mass removal of 47.5%. BCBS will have to replace a small number of trees as mitigation for exceeding the 47.5% woodland loss. Dedications - The Parks & Recreation Department is currently reviewing park and trail dedication issues. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed planned development will allow BCBS building expansion needs at the RiverPark location that they have identified through their long range planning. This expansion plan combined with their other expansion plans in Eagan will result in the employment of approximately 6,000 people. ~3. Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 8 The office park use has been compatible with this area since the early 1980's and the proposed RiverPark Office-Center Planned Development expansion will continue to be compatible with this area and also provide a benefit to the entire city. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development to permit four new 100,000 square foot office buildings on 52.5 acres To approve/deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Subdivision consisting of six lots on 52.5 acres. Approval of the Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision shall be subject to the conditions listed below. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1. The RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development allows for the construction of four new 100,000 square foot office buildings. 2. The RiverPark Office Center Planned Development shall expire 15 years from the date of City Council approval. 3. A Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision approval. The following exhibits are necessary for this Agreement: * Preliminary Site Plan * Preliminary Building Elevation Plan * Preliminary Sign Plan * Preliminary Landscape Plan Upon submission of Final plans, provided they are in conformance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final Planned Development of each lot may proceed to the City Council for approval. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Standard Conditions 1. The applicant shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, Gl, and H1. Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 9 2. The property shall be platted. Grading 3. Pond CP-7 shall be expanded to meet flood volume and outflow requirements of the entire surrounding drainage district in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. Storm Drainage 4. The storm sewer layout shall be revised to include additional catch basins and storm sewer to accommodate additional run-off generated by the expansion of the parking lots. Utilities 5. The applicant shall be required to construct a manhole over the proposed sewer service lines to provide the City with an inspection and monitoring manhole. 6. The alignment of the proposed water main shall be revised so that the water main along Yankee Doodle Road north of Terminal Drive is shown out of the City right-of-way. Streets/Access 7. The applicant shall be financially responsible for the upgrading and reconfiguration of Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive north to the cul-de-sac to remove the parking island and parking areas. 8. The applicant shall be financially responsible for the extension of Kennebec Drive to serve the development. BARKS i =o Y DARY A usT 2 H LSD ~ ' hQ• ~.~~wE o~ I @~ff C~ CIPtH~ . \v ( 2• J J C w~\ AOOW VIEW RD RED C AR R ur (y, t F C/ ~v OAKS RD. 7 0. 00- z R. CVO ETENDR ST. O DFLA o ir 2 / QUART c`~. ER F Z7 PARK = T CT PT. YAM i WATER TREAT TTTD-' FACLL TY. ® `ay~ h3 y CITY O MAWT. ~ dcA w Gp. FACILITY BO W 1 r ACK1 AC PA wk SK HILL 31 K ROAD 17- X16' .3 1 ~ KYLL N. ~ I-i Y 7 1 -qWK Al < H. IAZ ~~S ~4 fq <a c x KUM aLVER BELL SILVER BELL WK LA P1 ® - - - - - - - - W J 3 PNERT _ _ NVE d1 K '1 BLACKHAWK' PARK . f VT 5Z WAr t$` ,'y6 G WOOOHAVEN PARK IqVWT PC 1 V N`G ~v wx+PHr ERWOOD OR. LOCATION a~. a ,`t""•~ ~r. rfh,~r ~w,1 -4 ;:o.c, CL 13 use ZONING I-1 (Limited Industrial rr ; OUS IAL tv~ oCIFf a. R I F1. L ~ ~~TA ENCf LL 2. ~ 9 .5:~}w..~ D-N.~. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN D-m IND (Industrial) ~l - J aao IND ' •S I I ; D•N 0.11 D-1 , J ? P NO c EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDRY /LOT 2 LOT1 LOT3 LOT4 Ix I/X LOT 5 PROPOSED LOS' BOUNDRIES I= 1,2,3,4 & 5 LOT 6 (OUTLOT) ,p0 YANF-60 DRNG ~WM V DI,-) SUMMARY STfE 52.55 ACRES = 2.289.078 S.F. LOT 90501 S.F. ?1WE PRo.Jet1'ED Ho" No .TH 0 LOT 2 = 40,800 S.F. SUPPLEMENTAL LOT PLAN LOT 3 = 50,325 S.F. LOT 4 = 40,b00 S.F. LOT 5 = 40.600 S.F. LOT 6 - 2,026.425 S.F. Winsa/FWicyAr+chit",Inc. p o mciec RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER 1~Rw 8/4/95 V rr M. 471 wed. a," ww M15-709-9 F" howww" sslmu: EAGAN, MINNESOTA m-IV4 = Met-777.OR10 w p y~~ 1 ~l ti I ~r 11 \I ~ v 1 cNl~,~. GrPAUL. MINNay,roL,, f•R ftF-ry, L INi} ry d oM,.µA v. A6L - ~1 LRo/~D -1novNo rl MAKI PRoraarp J - - 20' kwr. ARoiJNV AC- NON E M .M Exl21 N ~ wttMq, ~ LOT t ; " 1'H 4;NOOnrb r r LOT LOT z V S LOT 4 ti N.w! I ffYOM / I I P X11. ? / v • ? cu vrhr - f rROroflD vubu c C. ~ \ t4/~T1~R 4/IwKi \ MAN awfpmk LOTS CAM# cA tai e \ /G1LVlIlT c. ~ ~ / I I Ni4L / ~ / r ~ ? 1 L_ ~I r --7 `!ANKCR DRrvB GOhgGCIW DR, ' - - T LOCATION STAGING PLAN BUILDING 'A" AND "B'- OCCUPANCY JAN. 1998 a s BUILDING "C" - OCCUPANCY JAN 2000 PROPOSED LOT PLAN BUILDING 'D' OCCUPA JA . 2002 SEE SHEET 4 FOR FAR" ALLOCATION Sho*ft V1r FWtyArd*wb k - MAN? 'WS/0's RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER • s 3a 411 wbEft Joe no m 44~ o EAGAN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS . i '-5 - ^/ss•s3 J )MAH A !AILROAD 4 7S.. -D A~ Ilk Ale 4, '4j J~ a CC 1 Aj(m-ur~ 100 4 14f NOf *4 MIESrIOG ~1_.y_•w• c,Nt oa'L.pT, r~• i..", ;..-....ti.., _ _~r~p3 . 1- - - i $60._siL~ Y ~firt - uSMf1[IROf.WO/ j : a N° /2 ~+f6L J~ i ~~J~~. I ?T/LIry \ p o - ' 4 w ,~i +•a ~ ogz,~Qp Am tz It Z Mae / \I v NO 1 0 lit \ nri I, \k N;% 7 1 RIVE % % 3 7 + 1 S 1 / , ~ ~ ~ 1 TJV~ Sov7+rl,•f 7iecrr LINT CA JAio CQ?/ X 4 1 i s i N ~I TTh ~tiouk'sv t 4 EXISTING SURVEY 0 (j) 3r• Sow: ' Winsor/FaricyArchitects, Inc. 1"=100 ~,,,..o• e/ii,s'"" RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER A 421 "Abbe" sh" "Now 02M cima 6/30190 Sam P" mWass" "102 Dromom Ra. ? 8709-950 EAGAN, MINNESOTA `~--1~10.•/~.r IN! `Y1'•. A AUL- ~.11NIV{~ N~ N,\ = 1 __-L'~~~__-may - - s 'r•earr - 1 _ --_----..".y?\\\?\ T ` / --_-q jap- -1 )A r ~ 1 MYV / r/ i I III ` ; D 1 I Irlerina / n?s at* r \ - «C q1~i uc.ai ra 1 %%i 111111 I! I I1I \ ww y r IIII I I\\ \ C, y~~ r 1 1 aw.~Y IBsrH ; y • ~~``(i( Illllil Ilil~~~ _ ==Q = \ >>=/,Orll 1 1 I'mo \ \ \ Illlitl 111111 /i~ir/r~~/f • y \ III \ \ ``'b~ # y ; \`1 ,I \ \ Mes ` \ \\y \ ;yam / / ,w „ate- III / ~ \ rr ~ II SOT rbm 1 i _ 'O; } YAwlf tlc~ ~ trslvb G ,cc? tsat?v ,fl i ' Il rte' ri orymM: tl 411 ,K/ ~ / • INDI(~.'fV4 tYWr• O'. nm1.4 LIf••fr ,'MA. LIpFfRNra. Y't!}• GODS. NYM. C7F aw"'TUR FFS Tilt M%VAO* fiA71C( II'+rNTIP164 iIit AMMAN"- 'l WA'RB$ %&QU1RE$At0' FM *0 S M. /ONO. . •TMM/rvr lIM.Id.MA* -MtfAW AT fA Pt6'/GNT G?/ y WMLO 4?1INe ID ANOKW • 9DFM wNwlsR'fltlfRfll $t OPr 41T6 PROPOSED SITE PLAN (unuTMs. S IMAGE AND GRADND) -*i1'LM1Zb'm smar.AftM: ?t-'I * -Al y raa 'mu.- IVr. UTILITIN9 ar NwowN rruv _ _ ~ rvolvr~ rent WinsodFariCYAIdWtects,hc Dr: siaaiss RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER ~wNn X..„,~...,.. m""""w"a ~ EAGAN, MINNESOTA .a•m+w w w•br.ro ova ~+o - - - _ _ - -ra'~°ri _ iii :~..-_7 :i---- - itim. zl'i I IT % _ _ - } / i f I 1 • ! - _ - : _ list X11; I i r 1•, ` _ , ~t 1./~ . J ~ to P~ ktlD EXISTING SITE PLAN err Nom 33. 0 Winsor/FaricyArchitects,Inc. o.,, ' 6 3019b 4Nmv: yv„r RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER .ft warm ISM "aft •sm a.wn MMNAMM ©7Q9. EAGAN, MINNESOTA PRAIRIE PLANTING APPRCD(. 10 ACNES I1\ ~ I11J y ` \'1 4.400 71 ~ y I PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN - g@WW NT OOOOLAPCO TO OO rMAOO ® POO.O.O PONS P ANTIS APP MK ,M. OCALOC 1. • ,00' O KKNR . file prep/ow TIC V 0 { N ,N ,N 7 r NORTH SCALE IN FEET w.- cr,FaricyArchitects,l ic- oaft RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER at %%*we t m RAO EAGAN. MINNESOTA fr 3 srrl b MW~ SSW-,w ii 0 0 _ c o WAM VRM Ull ~ •i i AIN r ~ ¦wat / Ir ells EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN NO" N~nt 35, - 0w Winsor/FaricyArchitects,lnc. o ; ' '89' ShoM NO RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER 421 WyabweM WW H WW ,]00 0~ 3A Sam 2p W. ; 0MYnrob Mlaz EAGAN, MINNESOTA $43-22; 06" Ad. ma OZ09-9501 c4+ 7+R. 0 PUnft PARKING Tai 1+14 4rAae4 7 „ram' 7.''64 749 y i L 7ft DMVe , ii/,i' 1 IfI II II ( I \ - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ \ \.J:.JJI~p 111111/ii \ l \ \ ~ 1 11 i ~ IA ~.i.' rposw Aatrornl '1I' f - - ~Rdl RCt$D 7~ tH N,Rn+ PROPOSED SITE PLAN /PARKING ANALYSIS AND ' STAGING /FINISHED CONTOURS 0 W WhKWFaiicyAnd*ecb,hc or. w.ro' ®is RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER ,,rM EAGAN, MINNESOTA m EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH r 01011 Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 14, 1995 FOR COMMISSION REVIEW AND ACTION: 1. Under it's current designation for development as a church, this proposal would not be subject to a parks dedication requirement. Should the designation change in the future, parks dedication would be required. 2. This development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication. 3. A Revised Tree Preservation Plan should be submitted and approved by staff which will result in reduced tree removal by implementing various activities including: a) Staff is suggesting that the access on Cliff Road be moved approximately 30' east of the proposed location to save approximately 30' east of the proposed location to save approximately 25, 28-30' Colorado Spruce trees and eliminate the need for the developer to acquire an easement from the neighboring property to the west. b) Staff is suggesting the developer do root pruning on some of the other spruce, pine and birch trees on site to allow the developer to transplant trees already existing on site, thus reducing the percentage of removal to approximately 40%. 5. The applicant will develop and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a grading permit, a minimum disturbance/minimum maintenance plan for pervious areas within the site. The intent of this plan will be to preserve existing vegetation whenever feasible and to minimize the need for applications of fertilizer and pesticides/herbicides. 6. Applicant will preserve an ungraded, unmentioned buffer strip extending 50 feet back from the normal water elevation of Thomas Lake. The boundary of the buffer strip will be clearly marked in the field prior to grading. 7. Applicant will avoid filling or draining of the fringe wetland along Thomas Lake. 8. Applicant will accomplish through on-site ponding a minimum phosphorus load reduction of 90% of that needed to meet non-degradation standards for Thomas Lake. Any remaining mitigation requirement will be met through payment of a supplemental cash dedication. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 9, 1995 CASE: 28-CG-6-5-95 28-RZ-1.0-5-95 APPLICANT: Easter Lutheran Church HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Easter Lutheran Church PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment & Preliminary Planned Development Amendment - Easter Lutheran Church LOCATION: Northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, single family residential (0-3 u/ac) ZONING: R-1 Single Family SUMMARY OF REQUEST Easter Lutheran Church is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the existing Land Use Guide Plan designation from D-I Single Family (0-3 u/ac) to PF- Public Facility, and a Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a 79,000 s.f. church facility to be located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. of/. Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 3 Conditional Use Permit required findings: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities,. processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Thomas Lake Park; zoned P; guided P. South - Twin Manor Addition; zoned R-1; guided D-I. East - South Water Treatment Facility & Clearwater Park, zoned P & PF;guided P & PF. West - Thomas Lake & Thomas Lake Add'n (single family d/u) zoned R-1; guided D-I. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Since 1991 the church has been involved in the development of its future church at this location. In 1994, the church proposed a four phase development which included the ultimate development of 73,385 s.f. of building, 380 nine foot parking stalls and an impervious surface coverage of 52.6%. At that time the plans included a approximately nine different parking areas. Parking lots surrounded the building on the north, east, and south sides. The plans were denied by the City Council due to the intensity of the development and associated high impervious surface coverage. 07, Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 4 Since that time the church has reevaluated its development possibilities for the site, and have reapplied after revising its plans to minimize the impervious surface coverage. The Natural Resources Subcommittee voted to recommend denial of the development proposal based on unacceptably high impacts to the woodland resource. A portion of the impact is due to the construction of detention basins needed to meet water quality treatment requirements for the site. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Introduction. Easter Lutheran Church is proposing to develop a church facility including worship, education, and family life activities at the proposed site. Actual development of the approximately 79,000 s.f. building and associated 384 parking spaces will occur in phases. The Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit process is being done in order to establish the feasibility of the project (for both the church and the City). The Conditional Use Permit is required when the impervious coverage exceeds the 25% maximum allowed by the shoreland zoning code. The church is proposing 34.7%. By developing in phases through the Planned Development process, the church can accommodate its projected growth with development of incremental phases, and the City will have an opportunity for detailed review of the specific requested development. Final development plans will be required with each phase of development. The primary difference in the plan is the reduction in footprint square footage of the building and the reduction in surface parking stalls. By reducing these two components, the overall impervious surface has been reduced by approximately 18%. For comparison purposes, the 1994 plan showed surface parking lots covering the majority of the buildable property, other than the 73,385 s.f. building (see exhibit). The building had a much larger footprint than it does now because the church has decided to stack or layer some of the uses rather than develop a building that is spread out on one floor. The current plan has a total square footage of 79,000 s.f., larger than the '94 plan. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: Currently, the site is guided D-I Single Family residential. The request by the applicant is to change the land use guide plan designation to PF - Public Facilities. The Comprehensive Guide Plan does not address churches or their specific locations. However, the City has approved church uses in a variety of locations including residentially guided property with access to major arterials such as Pilot Knob Road and Lexington Avenue. Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit Phasing The proposed development will occur in phases over the next 14 - 15 years. According to the church, a significant factor in the proposed timing is the success of a fund raising campaign. The church's current plan anticipates following three phases of development. Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 5 Phase I: Building Program: Multi-Purpose Great Room (Future Gymnasium) and support space 12-13,000 GSF building area Worship seating for approximately 400 Preschool Classrooms Small office Support spaces Estimated Cost: $2.2-2.3 million Parking Spaces: 150 (400 seats/2.7 seats/space) Time Frame: 1997-1998 Phase II Building Program: Facility for 650 seat sanctuary Expand phase I development from a Great Room serving multiple purposes to a fully developed balanced facility for a sanctuary capable of seating 650 (expandable in the future to 1,050). 49-50,000 GSF building area total (addition of 37,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $5.2 million Parking Spaces: 91 spaces (241 total) Time Frame: 2001-2002 Phase III Building Program: Facility for 1,050 seat sanctuary Expand phase H development by increasing the sanctuary seating capacity to 1,050 and enlarging all other church facilities to support this size increase. 78-79,000 GSF building area total (addition of 29,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $3.6 million Parking Spaces: - 143 additional including 143 spaces in structured parking. (384 total spaces) Time Frame: 2007-2009 Summary of Impervious Area by Phase: Estimated Estimated Total Percent Bldg Cov. Site Cov. Coverage Coverage Phase One 10,000 s.f. 52,900 s.f. 62,900 s.f. 14.6 Phase Two 13,000 s.f. 52,350 s.f. 63,350 s.f. 15.1 Phase Three 19.250 s.f. 0 s.f. 19.250 s.f. 4.5 Total 42,250 s.f. 105,250 s.f. 147,500 s.f. 34.2 Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 6 Lots The three unplatted parcels (PID No.'s 10-02800-010-79, 10-02800-020-79, & 10-02800- 010-80) will be required to be combined through the platting process prior to building permit issuance. Parcel 010-79, the northernmost, is approximately 3.0 acres (2.62 less highway right- of-way) South of that parcel is 020-79 which is 3.0 acres (2.66 less highway right-of-way) The largest parcel is located along both Cliff and Pilot Knob Road, and is 9.09 acres (7.59 less highway right-of-way. Combined, the lots total 15.09 acres (gross) or 12.87 (net) acres. The area of developable land remaining above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) is approximately 10.2 acres. Setbacks Thomas Lake is a designated as a General Development Lake in the City's Shoreland Zoning Code. Any building occuring adjacent to this Lake is required to maintain a minimum 50' setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The building and parking were designed to meet this setback requirement. Height The maximum allowable building height in a General Development Lake shoreland zone is 35'. At this point the church has no definitive architectural plans for the building. When Phase I is developed architectural plans will need to be submitted and reviewed. Parking Ordinance requires a minimum of one space per 3.5 sanctuary seats. The church, based on its experience at the Pilot Knob/Diffley Roads location, believes it needs to provide parking at a much higher ratio than the minimum. The concept plan has been developed at a rate of one space per 2.7 sanctuary seats, or 384 seats. As a result the church will be providing 84 seats above the code requirement. Phase III includes the construction of a parking ramp to accommodate the increased seating in the worship area. The ramp, or structure parking, is an effort to minimize the amount of impervious surface on the lot. This phase of development is not expected to develop for 12 or more years from now. Tree Preservation The tree inventory for the site identified 149 significant trees and approximately 40% of the site is covered by trees (crown coverage). The current sketch plan indicates that 97 trees or 65% of the significant trees identified will be removed. This exceeds the 30% allowable removal and will necessitate the replacement of 214 category "B" trees. It is the intent of the tree preservation policy to encourage development of buildings and parking lots that would take into account the significant tree locations and design around them where possible. With regard to that, staff is suggesting that the access on Cliff Road be moved 30' east of the proposed location. In doing so, approximately 25 of the 28 30' Colorado Spruce trees would be saved. By avoiding these mature spruce trees the church's removal would drop from 65% to approximately 50%, and the church would not need to acquire an easement from the neighboring property to the west. Ta Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 7 Another option discussed between the City Forester and the church is "root pruning". Because the church is not proposing development for a year and a half or two years, they are in a position to do root pruning on some of the other spruce trees and birch trees scattered throughout the site. This will allow the church to transplant trees already existing on site. This will further reduce the percentage of removal to approximately 40%. Water Quality This proposed development is located along the southeastern shore of Thomas Lake directly across the lake from Thomas Lake Park. The development would generate runoff that would discharge to Thomas Lake, a Class I direct contact recreation lake with a mean depth of about 4 feet and a maximum depth of 6 feet. In late 1995, the City reviewed a development proposal for this same site by the applicant. The City Council denied the development proposal, in part due to impacts on water quality in Thomas Lake and tree/woodland impacts. Water quality impacts stemmed mainly from the high impervious coverage of the site which was projected to generate a much larger runoff volume than could be adequately treated by on-site ponding within the development parcel. The applicant has revised the site plan to reduce the impervious coverage from 53% (based on the area of the site above the ordinary high water mark of Thomas Lake) for the original proposal to just under 35% for the current proposal. With the reduced impervious coverage, the site would require about one acre of properly located and designed ponding to meet the non-degradation standard for Thomas Lake, as well as some other design modifications. While the current site plan incorporates just under .5 acres of ponding, it appears feasible to accommodate water quality treatment requirements at the reduced development intensity proposed. The Natural Resources Subcommittee met on July 25, 1995 to review the June 29, 1995 site plan proposal. Because of unacceptably high impacts to tree resources on the site, the Subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend denial of the current development proposal. The Subcommittee did not deal specifically with the water-related aspects of the development proposal in its recommendation, but did acknowledge that construction of ponding for water quality treatment would exacerbate tree loss within the site and that an even lower density development may be the only way of meeting all natural resources management objectives for the site. The outlet and the northerly inlet for the proposed pond in the southwest corner of the site are situated too closely together to function properly for water quality purposes. The developer will need to revise the storm drainage plan to ensure that those pipes have proper spacing in accordance with City's Water Quality standards. . Wetlands. The only wetland located on the site is the fringe wetland associated with Thomas Lake which extends back from the edge of the lake anywhere from several feet to 75 feet depending on the location within the site. The June 29, 1995 site plan shows grading within this wetland fringe for a detention basin. Staff has requested that the developer avoid any grading Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 8 within the wetland fringe in order to provide maximum protection of the shoreline of Thomas Lake, and the developer has agreed to modify the site plan in this regard by moving the proposed ponding area further to the north. No filling or draining of the wetland fringe should be allowed. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control methods in accordance with the City's Erosion/ Sediment Control standards. Grading The preliminary grading plan as shown needs some revisions. The plan shows three areas where disturbance is encroaching into the 50' buffer area (measured from the OHWM). The proposed grading along the east edge of the site indicates slopes steeper than 3:1. City standards require that all graded slopes be 3:1 or gentler. The applicant should revise the grading plan to reflect either slopes of 3:1 or gentler or the construction of a retaining wall to meet the slopes requirements in that area. The plan also proposes to utilize the decked parking configuration on the south side of the development as a "retaining wall" on the slice extending from Cliff Road. However, the parking deck is not proposed to be constructed with the first phase of development, nor is a retaining wall in accordance with City standards. The applicant will be responsible for submitting plans and specifications with the final grading plans detaining the construction of any retaining walls for the development. Utilities An existing 8" sanitary sewer in Cliff Road has been provided to serve this site. The invert elevation of the 8" line is 907.5'. Existing watermain is available in Cliff and Pilot Knob; Roads. An 8" water main stub has been provided to the site in the southwest corner from Cliff Road and in the northwest corner of the site from Pilot Knob Road. Access/Street Design Street access for the proposed development is available from Cliff Road to the south and Pilot Knob Road to the east. The preliminary site plan shows a driveway connection to Cliff Road along the west property line of the site approximately 600 from Pilot Knob Road. The shared driveway along the west property line will require an easement from the adjoining property to the west. The driveway connection to Cliff Road is at a location where a median opening has been provided on Cliff Road. If the access is moved 30' to prevent the loss of the Spruce trees the County would have to approve the new location and grant a permit. The County plat commission recommends that a right turn lane be required to be built by the developer for the Cliff Road driveway opening. North/south access is provided from Pilot Knob Road, the City's water treatment facility and park are located opposite of this site and the church's ingress/egress location will be matched directly across from the Water Treatment Facility's access. The County's approval of the driveway connection to Pilot Knob Road is contingent on the removal of the three existing driveway connections to Pilot Knob Road. ft Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 9 Easements /Right-of-Way Dakota County will require 75 feet of half right-of-way on Cliff Road, therefore an additional 15 feet of right-of-way will be required to be dedicated on the final plat. This additional right-of-way should be reflected, for planning purposes, on all plan sheets submitted. Compatibility with Surrounding Area. Locating churches in or near residential neighborhoods is typical and can be compatible land uses. Locating a church facility near a public facilities district is also a compatible combination. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment The requested change in land use from D-I (0-3 units/ acre) to PF - Public Facilities would be compatible land uses. Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit Developing the site as a Planned Development matches the church's desire for phasing the project over a number of years and the City's interest in reviewing specific development as it occurs. The proposal generally meets the requirements for lots and setbacks. An outstanding issue (related to the Conditional Use Permit) for the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to decide is whether to permit the 9.7% impervious surface above the 25% maximum. The revised proposal is 34.7%; 17.9% lower than the 52.6% originally requested in 1994. Specific plans will be required with each phase of development. The Church is interested in gaining approval of the proposed land use change and approval of its Preliminary Planned Development so it may move ahead with more detailed plans involving fund raising and site development. Detailed plans are required with each phase of development for review by the City. Prior to reviewing those plans a revised grading plan should be submitted which will not show any encroachment into the 50' buffer area. A couple of options have been discussed with regard to reducing the percentage of tree removal. The Commission may want to consider how these options can be incorporated into the development. Any changes to the plan would require a revised plan to be submitted. ACTIONS TO BE-CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-I (0-3 units per acre) to PF - Public Facilities. To recommend approval or denial of the proposed Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit for a 79,000 s.f. church facility with a total of 384 parking spaces and a maximum impervious surface coverage of 34.7% subject to the following conditions: 0 Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 10 Planned Development 1. The applicant should enter into a Planned Development Agreement in accordance with Section 11.40 Subd. 6. Planned Development with the City prior to the Final Planned Development/Preliminary Subdivision application. Conditional Use Permit 2. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of its approval with documentation of its recording provided to the City. Planned Development Phasing Sequence 3. To permit Easter Lutheran Church to construct a church facility in three phases of development: Phase I: Building Program: Multi-Purpose Great Room (Future Gymnasium) and support Space 12-13,000 GSF building area Worship seating for approximately 400 Preschool Classrooms small office support spaces Estimated Cost: $2.2-2.3 million Parking Spaces: 150 (400 seats/2.7 seats/space) Time Frame: 1997-1998 Phase II Building Program: Balanced Facility for 650 seat sanctuary Expand phase I development from a Great Room serving multiple purposes to a fully developed balanced facility for a sanctuary capable of seating 650 (expandable in the future to 1,050). 49-50,000 GSF building area total (addition of 37,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $5.2 million Parking Spaces: 91-spaces (241 total) Time Frame: 2001-2002 Phase III Building Program: Balanced facility for 1,050 seat sanctuary Expand phase II development by increasing the sanctuary seating capacity to 1,050 and enlarging all other church facilities to support this size increase. 78-79,000 GSF building area total (addition of 29,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $3.6 million Parking Spaces: 143 additional including 143 spaces in structured parking. (384 total spaces) Time Frame: 2007-2009 Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 11 Summary of Impervious Area by Phase: Estimated Estimated Total Percent . Bldg Cov. Site Cov. Coverage Coverage Phase One 10,000 s.f. 52,900 s.f. 62,900 s.f. 14.6 Phase Two 13,000 s.f. 52,350 s.f. 63,350 s.f. 15.1 Phase Three 19,250 s.f. 0 s.f. 19.250 s.f. 4.5 Total 42,250 s.f. 105,250 s.f. 147,500 s.f. 34.2 Planned Development Term 4. The term of the Planned Development shall be 15 years from the date of City Council approval, and Phase I shall be commenced by January 1, 1997. The site must be platted prior to the initiation of Phase I. Final Planned Development 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following plans shall be approved. This may be approved in stages as development ensues. * Final Plat * Final Site Plan * Final Lighting Plan * Final Utility Plan * Final Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan * Final Landscaping Plan * Final Signage * Final Building Elevation * Tree Preservation Plan Financial Obligation 6. At the time of development, financial obligations will be charged for Lateral Benefit Water, Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer Trunk, WAC, (all at the rate effective on that date). Grading 7. The grading plan shall be revised to reflect grading slopes of 3:1 or gentler. Tree Preservation 8. Replacement of 97 significant trees with 214 Category "B" trees shall occur either on-site or off-site. A replacement plan should be submitted to indicate exact planting locations. Parking 9. The revised site plan shall show the additional. 15' of right-of-way which may affect the proposed parking layout and setbacks. 10. The development will permit a total of 384 nine foot parking stalls. Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 12 Water Quality 11. , A minimum disturbance/minimum maintenance plan for pervious areas within the site shall be developed and submitted for City approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. The intent of this plan will be to preserve existing vegetation whenever feasible and to minimize the need for applications of fertilizer and pesticides/herbicides. 12. A 50' buffer strip in which no existing vegetation may be disturbed or impacted shall be established extending back from the OHWM of Thomas Lake shall be established. The boundary of the buffer strip will be clearly marked in the field prior to grading. 13. Through on-site ponding a minimum phosphorus load reduction of 90% of that needed to met non-degradation standards for Thomas Lake shall be met. Any remaining mitigation requirement will be met through payment of a supplemental cash dedication. Wetlands 14. No filling or draining of the fringe wetland along Thomas Lake. Streets/Access 15. All revised plans shall be revised to show a total of 75' half right-of-way for Cliff Road (County Road No. 32). . FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Easter Lutheran Rezoning - Financial Obligation The properties under consideration for rezoning to public facility were charged for their share of the City's public utility infrastructure at single family rates. There is no additional charge at the time of, or as a condition of rezoning. There are, however, additional charges due at the time of platting. The following estimate of charges due was prepared using the 1995 rates. The financial obligation will be computed at the rates in existence at time of final platting. Improvements Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Water P.F. $25.50/ff 1578.41 ff $40,249 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer P.F. 19.20/ff 630.79 ff 12,111 Storm Sewer Trunk P.F. .04/sq. ft. 435,600 sq. ft. 17,424 WAC P.F. 2,745/Ac 10 Ac 27.450 TOTAL 7 234 V A AA rrLL X(D AY ix CA T r~ r2 ` r~ i h~ IB 1y~ r p Qf s N ZBL P HAW G x SeIRY tT5 olR tl ! g~ 0 "0~ _ 18 7 ~ s ~ v ~ LAIC • i~ - _ ' P ARBOR CT. LA N -0 3: i O ENZELAVE p l• ~ 0 o f r .a~ an0 av cp m m o iA.4 n yf O po(7tt' c ! m y ~(1 Z! y D Kt DR. AK ` 1 ~1~ m 0 Q yZ KNOB z n - PA V r W TRASSE 3~A ~f'Pf aPvE y T m 1d G\ F Q LA, y D x 4P `~{p ' ld g _ O A o D z ,:iA, s O D~4E9 b ti cY~+ OOOM2! ~C' In o yc or VD. t a ti0 O t s r, Opp ~p~ CREST DGE PILOT K RD ~ PILOT KNOB 7 E - - - - - t7 STE - . ~C ?1C. ronr( V1 I m O LT m ' s , 0153 J r o 1 { rL k~ T. I ARDE LA. < m r I W yr N TR. s TOP RD. C f ? DR. 0 ; V N K 3AS i• o ARW kCJi1 x PiNECREST a ORS A£ A1AR IY O N S1U , PW RRY n ~i°Z~ Ci. • ~ > t ~ ~ D !A c^.p~ WUIDCR ST O TA /O t T S_~_ 0 x NY 0 o f ' Cl ~4y < R nX02 s s C ? N C. AIALMD L R < o pf j W A - •~c A OAI( OVW - - o rm - A T, r RIDG a nJ=!lL: PL. b D C o D< cv0 m A ova T x l~~l C P~ RD X r V F z' Q4 ; C z , ~ R n 'ofqm .BOR ( DDD /LIIJ Icy L R'DC ION LA. 7AC D -1 -1 IiIH ANOROAIE o Z X A l~ l WE r~~ v s ~ o uAN z i LEXOWY - II~' ' CT Y R. rgcA, O0 JL x- PR I 1 0 AI fAp , AHAR' Y ax o 'a > WAY 7-3 a IHOUAS1~ME PaRK= dlk ZONING R-1 (Single Family Residential) A , r~?yb 41M 6^I A PMOVIEW GOLF i.. L. CMMSE yyy:_ i%\. •j` . :°-aq:r.:'~:i`,fir L-l l l 0.1 ~ O.1 J O•II P. PF P PF PF p COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN °"1V D-1 (Single. Family Residential) CSC 1' . + ,pF PF i I P t PF _t.. 0.1 ~~•-1 1i't-• PF III - II i Id'\'A'1'It,\ ~ n,l I HARD COVER I I Site Area (9.9 Acres) 481,244 sq.ft. ' I I P Impervious Area 147,500 sq.ft. Percent Impervious 34.2% PARKING O I Ultimate Development 384 spaces / I Sanctuary Capacity 1,050 seats I ` I Parking Ratio 2.7-.(, / i S orn,w ler ( (5 rmw~tcr ; I \~~11 Pena ` I I ;~,trt:R rl;cr;Mr:.r IIANI l>J( I:VTRY lil(I 1'IIoIVIr1 ~ltl II' o 0 -I PHASE ( , PHASE III Q. THR E '-T"" TWO li I' IAEO I.~I I 4 cneruu i . i ' llrap-0R ~ t 3 Pend e - - ~ / ' i Phaw One end Two Parking w on grade I I 147 3pea Above I: / 1 \ % 145,3pacei Aebw t dote " iioitudarv ' urvv% oltl nuu d from I)vllnar II. -c•Itw ,c I:nnl :emu rout o• - In • Topography )bliamcd front I) ik 1:, (:oonl, f:n~u,r •i i c Ilrl 1. N O R T H I'ttrw.. 0 60 100 200 CONCEPT PLAN Holsington Koegler Group Inc. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH Pat. ru "~°ar" r,t. n.nn ...tr.,.6-..w4.6iiN0. o.,., N/e/Nt /1 . - Thomas Lake Site Eagan, Minnesota a•w•t•••~ `(/~QJ~. _ LN Wr / YvwaawaW • Moabc / Ouy 7300 Metro Doulstard, Suite 525 YlnneapoIU, Ylaaaaeta 55499 612/266-9060 Significant Trees to be Replaced ----i-~ Hardwoods B" to 20" 19 .UN +20" 3 y~ Softwoods 12" to 24" 25 +247 8 Conifers 12' to 24' 5 I. +24' 40 I - xa .0 , 4r. ` xo.r )Ircx r':. •pe u - aw yfr L 411V # • yif X j• Key ~E, ti . xai W tc .:er Nark: 908..^• t _ 'r x- wr CE Chinese Elm s u I . _ E Elm BE Boxelder 50' Setback fro'- CS Colorado Spruce W Willow Ordinary High - I , CW Cottonwood Water Level CA Crabapple oi' ' SM Silver Yale BO Bur Oak Maple THOMAS ! '9t'°yi, 9fa5c=' PO Pin Oak ••N o.. QA Qua king Aspen Disturbance : LAKE o :y AP Austrian Pine Boundary ow 4. - - - - - - Xch ^j xs ~ xa of 18 Xn 4r Kol Or Dk _ _ xer.s .rs 1 xol ao - - r , Xca 3r - - - asx xeas -it• coax Xce or _ ?t s t iI ca LX!)," . XQ Cl a0X - ' 0 ad e "ft__.._. s.;=a Note: • Boundary Survey obtained from Delmar H. Schwanz Land Surveyors Inc. * Topography obtained from Dakota County Engineering Dept. . N 0 Pr unary Tree Inventory 71~= ,o soo no as Holeington koegler Group Inc. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH Thomas Lake Site: Ragan. Minnesota . • Ij WA'I'I•:u Tftl•:,11'MI:Nr 'l.,\N'I' ENTRY f)ioVi.: '[HC)M[\S_, l I I II LJ\I~I~; i ~tf I f~ ~ I _ ?..ei, p uk. ' a r.u...elr I UN-.. 9-.MO ` u.lu/A. I I III • M L. s ' I{ . •MI If Cliff Rond V l r-. 11 Nolc ttoundary Survor ul,l+unrcl frnac Uc•luuu ll. >chwacr• I.uc,d tiarvr\ur- All Topoµraplcv ubl.unad (ram Ib,l.u1„ I•:m n n•or mq Dept.. N0RTII _Wltl,ilrgrl_~ ' Oo too Zoo PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN Hoieington Koegler Group Inc. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH ft*., Thomas Lake Site : Eagan, Minnesota n...,.. / o..,.e 7300 Metro ooulovard, gull. 325 Mlnne.oelb, Mlnaeeete O5 39 012/090-9900 - - - - l43Ot..M......I •U1 1 / . zzy \ I III so Ap" / ..w.& OwNrAft MI.. Wager Lrd I \ • I: / I WATFyt TIMAIWI T ?afflfY OWN ~ '1' I I c) tit ~ I A l\ l Y i D liii ail. 1 a*.+ a I III fp" o III ~I IIII I I II. ~I I pCQQ~Qoo~•' ; • ....cuO~Q~~ III I F7 II h • ~ «.,,,.rw. , M.~i.r I JIII 1994 PLAN \ l Nola • Houod•trt `uwt•~ ebl.unt•d h•.u~ IMht(ar 11 i.u I.•...1 : nru).nw In.• • Tul.i Lraph) .d?1..(n.nl h•u~i I)•Iw.•I.I (..tool. Ku, .....•rw 1.. 1.( N02T8 CONCEPT PLAN saisw i..glr ar.up Inc blip" Room EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH Thomas Lake Site : Eagan, Minnesota lod Now • ~ill.i 0~1.tt~ .'n~w -loom FINANCIAL OBLIGATION LEGEND ;yia:::::•: no . - _ - i ;;,:,..,:;l.• ~rttar' Lateral Benefit Water 000 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer A~ Storm Sewer Trunk Water Availability Charge T J Pit , Bran Church Lutheran Easter MOWN M - - • - -r siartdard city .Of Sagan approved • pig t• PUBLIC WORKS DE P.ARTMEN - city of eagan MEMO DATE: AUGUST 10, 1995 TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION CC~ FROM: JON OYANAGY`RECREATION SUPERVISOR SUBJECT: HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE UPDATE Requested Action The Holz Farm Task Force has requested the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to: 1. Review this memorandum and comment on the progress and future plans of the Task Force. 2. Recommend to the City Council that funding be made available to conduct an architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical condition examination and evaluation not to exceed $5,000. 3. Recommend to the City Council the addition of two new members to the Task Force. Background The Holz Farm Task Force was formed at the May 15 City Council meeting. The group has met on the third Wednesday of each month since May 24. Overall, the members seem enthusiastic, committed, and open-minded. The Task Force includes: Sandra Bahn Joan Biasing Karl Drutowski Don Holz Rollie Johnson Lee Markell Gordon Taylor Ted Wachter Tom Walkington Supported by staff members: C.J. Lilly, Dorothy Peterson and Jon Oyanagi . The Task Force formed three subcommittees to explore the Family History, Area History and Building Condition. These subcommittees have met separately to gather information. They have been reporting back to the Task Force as noted in the meeting notes. The highlight has been the information concerning the Holz Farm family. Don Holz recalled many events and facts that are helping to create a personalized picture of Holz Farm. Marv Sell added a variety of photos and artifacts that date into the distant past. At the July Task Force Meeting, the Family History subcommittee recommended that the era for programming all. efforts be focused on 1941. That is the period when electricity first came to the farm. The first tractor, owned by Don Holz, is from that era. The farm became most productive in the 1940's. This period also allows programming efforts into the era before modernization and to contrast the changes. This could fill a niche not yet addressed by other historic facilities. The time line is attached for Commission review. This time line allows for a formal report and recommendation in early 1996. This extends well beyond a time line submitted previously but seems to be more realistic. The timing also allows for inclusion in the 1997 budget planning process. For 1996, a small amount of funding should be included to allow for some activity at the site. The locks on the farm house have been broken twice with entrance completed once. No noticeable damage had occurred. The locks have been repaired. The neighborhood, in addition to the police and police explorers, are also watching over the site. The Task Force will be holding two additional clean-up days August 23 and September 9. They will be touring other farms September 9 and October 7. After that they will be reviewing information gathered and formulating their overall recommendation. September 23 the Task Force is holding a "block party" at the park and farm for the neighborhood surrounding Holz Farm. This event is hoped to be a goodwill gesture to include the residents on planning the utilization of the site. The fun will include the new playground and backstop at the neighborhood park. The Task Force is beginning to acquire and look into leads regarding equipment or artifacts for the farm. Focusing on a specific period will help assist efforts to obtain items unique to that era. Lee Markell outbid everyone to obtain many items at the Boesel Farm auction held on July 16. Ted Wachter has gotten leads on farm equipment and a windmill. As the process grows, it is certain that antiques and artifacts will present themselves in abundance. Issues Bill Bruestle, Senior Building Inspector, has checked all of the buildings at the farm and submitted his report There is quite a list of repairs needed to meet codes for public use. The inspection department is limited in what they can provide in the way of evaluation and assessment. They recommend evaluating the structural integrity of the buildings, especially the barn. All mechanical evaluation must be done by professionals in those areas. Therefore, the Task Force is recommending that an engineering firm be contracted with to perform a complete architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical examination and evaluation of the site. This will prove valuable.in all aspects of the decisions made concerning utilization of the farm. The examination and evaluation will impact what era the farm may return to, what buildings are used or restored or demolished, and will provide a prioritization for preserving and maintaining the site. The report would provide the basis for capital improvements and laying out a realistic time line. Funding sources and amounts would all be dependent on information from this report. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH) submitted a proposal prior to the formation of the Task Force. In one of their proposed service sections they propose this type of examination and evaluation. The cost quoted is $4,850. Staff could go out for quotes in hopes of finding the best possible provider. SEH has done several historic preservation projects. Another issue concerns expanding the membership of the Holz Farm Task Force. Two additional people are interested in joining the Task Force: Debbie Issacson - Neighborhood Resident 4662 Manor Drive, Eagan Ann McCarthy - Educator, Conservationist 590 South Greenleaf Drive, Eagan The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will need to recommend to the City Council the addition of these members. Staff Comments Staff has been pleased with the enthusiasm and energy of all Task Force members. They show a willingness to work hard and keep the best interests of the farm, family, neighborhood and City in mind. Progress has been swift and shows no sign of diminishing. The two prospective Task Force members seem to be excellent additions to the group with good backgrounds which may complement others. Staff recommends adding both to the Holz Farm Task Force. The timing of these additions should not pose too difficult a transition for them or the other members. Funding for the examination and evaluation of the physical facilities is of utmost importance to the future of Holz Farm. This needs to be done at some point. Now seems to be the best time in order for the information to be best utilized as a part of the Holz Farm Task Force. Postponing this work may nullify Task Force recommendations. The use of some buildings may be eliminated due to structural problems and/or soaring costs. Examining and evaluating the current condition may allow for the performance of necessary work to preserve and protect and also prevent further deterioration. Delaying this step delays or limits the Task Force's activities and slows the progress towards an active site. Summary I will be available to discuss the progress of the Task Force with the Commission at their meeting on August 14. cc: Holz Farm Task Force Meeting Notes Holz Farm Task Force Time Line Holz Farm Building Inspection Inventory of Ella Holz's Garden Hotz Farm/Augupdat.e MEM city of eagan TO: JON OYANAGI, RECREATION SUPERVISOR FROM: BILL BRUESTLE, SENIOR INSPECTOR DATE: JULY 21, 1995 SUBJECT: HOLZ FARM Thank you for asking Protective Inspections for our opinion on the Holz Farm properties. After a walk-through of these buildings by our inspectors, I have comprised an overview of the items that need to be addressed to bring each building up to current building codes. With the exception of the machine shed and hog/sheep barn, all buildings seem to be of sound structure. House ? The roof needs to be replaced. ? There are some problems with the ceiling and exterior walls on the second level that need repair because of a leaky roof. ? The front porch will have to be repaired. ? Some of the brick in the chimneys need to be retucked. ? A ramp for accessibility will have to be provided. ? All electrical, plumbing, heating, building, and energy codes must be complied with. Garage 10. The garage roof is in need of repair. Barn If the barn is to be used by the public or as a.meeting facility, the following need to be addressed: ? Some areas of the roof must be repaired. ? Accessibility will have to be looked at. barn (COnt.l It is recommended that a structural engineer check on the stability of the upper portion of the barn. An alarm system should be added. ? The electrical must be brought up to current standards. Chicken Coup ? Repairs are needed on the roof and cupolas. Milk and Dump/wellhouse ? No repairs are necessary. Granary and Machine Shed ? The roof is in need of repairs. ? It is difficult to know if the foundation is sound because of all the trees that have grown up around the building. Machine Shed ? This building should be reconstructed with .new supports. There should be some framing changes (not too much as it would take away the building's culture status). Corn Crib Not much can be done with this. Storage & Hog/Sheep Barn ? This building must be rebuilt to make it a sound structure as it looks like there was a fire at ne end of this building. It is unique in that it was used as a multi-purpose building. If you need additional information on these buildings, please let me know. Senior Inspector WBrs holzfarm.jon tU FIOLZ FARM TASK FORCE TENTATIVE TIME LINE MAY, 1995 * FORM TASK FORCE * DEVELOP SHORT TERM BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE PLAN. * ORGANIZE CLEAN-UP DAY. * TOUR HOLZ FARM. JUNE, 1995 * CLEAN-UP DAY JUNE 3. * BEGIN ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS. * BEGIN GATHERING HISTORICAL DATA. FORM A SUB- COMMITTEE TO GATHER THIS INFORMATION. * PLAN A SUMMER EVENT. JULY, 1995 * WRAP UP BUILDING AND GROUNDS ASSESSMENT AND AUGUST, 1995 RECOMMEND 1995 WORK PLAN. * WRAP UP HISTORICAL RESEARCH. * HOLD AN EVENT ON SITE. USE AS A PUBLIC MEETING, ALSO. * PLAN A FALL EVENT. SEPTEMBER, 1995 * PRESENT A PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE PUBLIC, COMMISSION AND COUNCIL. * PLAN THE. FALL EVENT. * TOUR OTHER HISTORICAL AND WORKING FARMS. * BEGIN PLANNING RECOMMENDATION. OCTOBER, 1995 * HOLD FALL EVENT. * PLAN RECOMMENDATION. NOVEMBER, 1995 * PLAN RECOMMENDATION. DECEMBER, 1995 * WRAP UP RECOMMENDATION. FORMULATE DRAFT PROPOSAL. JANUARY, 1996 * PRESENT DRAFT PROPOSAL. FEBRUARY, 1996 * REVISE PROPOSAL BASED ON FEEDBACK. * PLAN KICK-OFF EVENT. MARCH, 1996 * PRESENT THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE PUBLIC, COMMISSION AND COUNCIL. MAY, 1996 * KICK-OFF EVENT. Holz Farm Task Force Member Meeting May 24, 1995 6:25-8:50 PM PRESENT VERE: Joan Biasing (JB), Sandra Bahn (SB), Karl Drutowski (KD), Don Holz (DH), Rollie Johnson (RJ), Jon Oyanagi (JO), Dorothy Peterson (DP), Gordon Taylor (GT), and Tom Walkington (TW) 1. Met at Trapp Farm Shelter Building A. Introductions B. Members still needed on task force: local business representative and school district representative C. Review of Mission and possible farm usage recommendations by steering committee II. Cleaning Day was discussed A. Planned to meet June 3, 1995 1-5 at farm for cleaning B. (JO) will make flyers about the day and (SB) & (KD) will canvas the Eagan community C. Bring gloves and lawn maintenance tools III. Tour of Holz Farm This was the highlight! Memories were everywhere for many of the task force members. Grounds and buildings were looked over and found to be in surprisingly fair condition. Special attention will need to go towards the attic- "bats in the belfry" have left an abundance of droppings. IV. Sub Committees were formed as follows: A. Family History DH, DP, RJ, JB, and JO B. Farm Area History TW, KD, and GT C. Building Inspection JO D. Minutes SB HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE MEMBERS LIST 1. Joan Biasing 8. Tom Walkington 642 Atlantic Hills Drive 4631 Lenore Lane Eagan, MN 55123 Eagan, MN 55122 (h) 454-7747 (h) 452-1140 2. Don Holz 9. Ted Wachter 23787 Essex Ave So 4540 Blackhawk Rd Farmington, MN 55024 Eagan, MN 55122 (h) 460-6096 (h) 456-0412 (w) 469-5424 ext. 337 3. Karl Drutowski 10. Dorothy Peterson 4664 Manor Drive Superintendent of Recreation Eagan, MN 55123 Eagan Parks and Recreation (h) 688-7370 3830 Pilot Knob Road (w) 892-4612 Eagan, MN 55122 (w) 681-4660 4. Gordon L. Taylor 11. C.J. Lilly, Parks Planner 1358 Wilderness Run Rd Eagan Parks and Recreation Eagan, MN 55123 3830 Pilot Knob Road (h) 454-9634 Eagan, MN 55122 (w) 297-6953 (w) 681-4660 5. Sandra Bohn 12. Jon Oyanagi, Recreation Supervisor 3849 Windcrest Ave Eagan Parks and Recreation Eagan, MN 55123 3830 Pilot Knob Road (h) 454-8380 Eagan, MN 55122 (w) 681-4660 6. Rollie Johnson 13. Ken Vraa, Dir of Parks & Recreation 1076 McKee St Eagan Parks and Recreation Eagan, MN 55121 3830 Pilot Knob Road (h) 454-2135 Eagan, MN 55122 (w) 681-4660 7. Lee Markel) 895 Park Knoll Drive Eagan, MN 55123 (h) 456-0749 cs2/holzmeml.st J HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE MEETING NOTES JUNE 28, 1995 Members present: Tom Walkington, Dorothy Peterson, C.J. Lilly, Joan Biasing, Karl Drutowski, Lee Markell, Rollie Johnson, Don Holz, Jon Oyanagi. Guest: Amy Sievers. Absent: Gordon Taylor, Sandra Bahn, Ted Wachter. Began the meeting at 6:40 PM. Reviewed tune 3 Clean-Up Day. 10 people were present. Huge piles were hauled away. Most of the refuse was found on the grounds and in some of the out buildings. City Forester trimmed numerous bushes and trees. One downed tree was cut up and removed prior to the clean-up day. One Elm tree and, soon, one Boxelder tree will be removed from the area west of the house. The garden weeding was begun and this huge job continues. Another clean-up day was discussed for August. Building-Assessment Report. Bill Bruestele, Building Inspector, has not had a chance until June 29 to inspect the buildings. He will report back on many issues addressing the various levels of use. Jon has checked into the bat issue in the attic of the house. Joan Galley from the Department of Natural Resources is an expert on bats and cleaning up after them. Efforts to toilet train bats has proven unsuccessful. According to Joan, bats are in nursery colonies currently birthing baby bats. By mid-July the young are able to fly and catch their food. When the weather turns cold in the fall, bats leave for warmer climates. That is when clean-up should occur. Prior to clean-up, spotters need to determine where the bats enter and exit the house. One can also enter the attic to look for daylight cracks. Holes and cracks can be filled with a variety of substances. Bats, unlike mice, do not chew through obstructions. The dust from bat dung is the hazard to be careful of when cleaning. Depending on the individual, reactions vary from mild to severe flu-like symptoms. Some people are allergic to this fungus as well. Keeping the dung damp helps reduce the dust. Masks are recommended. After total removal one needs to disinfect the area. Bats return year after year. Blocking off one location just diverts them to other sites. Perhaps bat houses need to be installed to provide an alternative to our other out buildings. Jon will report back at the July 26 meeting with the building inspection report. plan is set may mean redoing any work done to provide adequate living quarters and not be as cost effective. Funds are not available for major work projects. Don reports that the septic system may need replacing and that the well water quality may not be adequate. Jon will ask maintenance to clean the hay out of the barn. Lee will check with the National Weather Service to determine when a heavy snowfall occurred in late April, early May in either 1926, 1927 or 1928. That is the year the barn burned down and the current barn constructed. Lee reports the Eagan Garden Club is interested in helping to maintain 'Ella's garden. Members of the Task Force and Garden Club will meet at the site to discuss care, identification and a plan of action. C.J. will ask the part-time horticulturalist to do an inventory as well. Don reports that buttercups and locust tree imported from the eastern U.S. should be identified and preserved due to their coming west with the family. The next meeting of the Holz Farm Task Force is scheduled for Wednesday, July 26 at 6:30 PM at Trapp Farm Park Shelter building, 841 Wilderness Run Road. The Family History subcommittee will meet Wednesday, July 12 at 7:00 PM at Trapp Farm Park Shelter building. Meeting adjourned around 9:00 PM. holz/6-28mtg. jo Holz Farm Information Wilhelm 12-26-48 - 3-28-35 Elisa Dehno-Holz 2-3-53 - 4-21-33 Otto Holz Sr. 3-6-1880 - 10-30-64 Married 2-5-1902 Louise Rahn Holz 6-28-1882 - 9-2-59 Elsie 12-26-02 - 1 1-12-68 Married Herb Heuer 10-31-23 Hugo 10-30-04 - 2-5-83 Married Florence Enghert 6-12-29 Otto Jr. 11-25-06 - Married Ella Trapp 6/33 Hertha 5-8-13 - 1-8-76 Married Harold Schwaul 4-26-33 All born at home Social life revolved around family, friends and TLO Church Wedding receptions were at the home place usually a fattened calf would be butchered early on the morning of the wedding. Otto Sr. was Eagan town road overseer 18 years, Trustee 37 years at TLO Church, Director of Eagan Town Mutual Fire Insurance Company 30 years, carpenter and blacksmith work. Built the present house in 1911. Otto Sr. had a burst appendices about was taken to Wescott Station on a wood frame. Dr. inserted drain at home and was taken to a St. Paul Hospital by train. He was in a coma for a period of time, it was rare to survive at that time. Hugo & Otto had tonsils removed at home, operating table was the kitchen table. 4-6 horses on farm until tractor was purchased. Threshing and silo filling was a neighborhood shared project with the Weierkas, Reinkes, Kirchners. In 30's thresher was Foster Beaudette 40's , was Herb Lau Late 40-50's Elmer Rahn 50's Hugo Holz Silo filling - I don't know about 30's, but 40's Louis Trapp Sr., 50's Hugo Holz, 60's Otto had his own. Also corn shredding by Hugo Holz in late 30's and early 40's Fred Heuer had a saw rig powered by an old car engine with which he cut up lengths of logs to stove/furnace lengths. 69 HOLZ FARM TASK FORCE MEETING NOTES JULY 26, 1995 Attendance: Lee Markell, Rollie Johnson, Don Holz, Gordon Taylor, Tom Walkington, C.J. Lilly, Dorothy Peterson, Jon Oyanagi Absent: Sandra Bahn, Karl Drutowski, Joan Blaping, Ted Wachter Committee Reports: Family History: The group met July 12 with Marv Sell, Ted Wachter, Don Holz, Dorothy Peterson and Jon Oyanagi in attendance. Marv had several photos, articles and mementos from the family archives. Many will eventually become useful for the farm and many are appropriate for general Eagan area history displays. The group decided to focus on 1941 as the period to center on should restoration to the past occur at the farm. This period represents when modernization introduced itself in the form of the first motorized tractor and the use of electricity. The era also allows the display of pre-modern equipment pulled by horses. It was in the 40's when the farm began its most productive period. Area History: This subcommittee continues to dig and research for local history that may impact the utilization of the farm. Tom is taking July 31 off from work to research. What dedication! Buildings: Attached is a report from Bill Bruestle, Senior Building Inspector. He, along with Dale Weglietner, Fire Marshal, and fellow inspectors went into each building and wrote up their findings. Their perspective was from a code enforcement point of view. They viewed each building as if the public would be using them but not as if they would be inhabited. They recommended the barn be checked by a structural engineer. Jon displayed a proposal from Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to conduct a thorough architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical condition examination and evaluation. SEH would examine the: • Exterior and interior architecture *Structural system (exterior walls, floor framing, roof, etc.) *Electrical system (code violation and light fixtures) *Mechanical system (heating and cooling) • Plumbing system •ADA requirements SEH will make recommendations for necessary work. They will prepare cost estimates of the work needed. At some point this information is vital to many decisions. The Task Force determined that the information is vital to the early stages of their planning. Therefore, they recommend the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and City Council recommend allocation of funds not to exceed $5,000 for the purpose of conducting the examination and evaluation. Fall Event - September 23 had been targeted as the date for a fall event. Gordon recommended a "block party" type event. This would hopefully: 1. Involve the neighborhood in the development process. 2. Maintain goodwill versus conducting a huge "invasion" into their neighborhood. 3. Work as a "kick-off" for the neighborhood park as well as the farm. A subcommittee will meet to plan the details. This group will consist of Gordon, Karl, Joan and neighborhood residents. Clean-UIDates: The Task Force wishes to conduct two additional clean-up days. The first will be held before the Task Force Meeting August 23 from 3:00 to 7:00 p.m. The second will be Saturday, September 9 from 8:00 a.m. until the group leaves for tours of other farms. Garden Inventory: C.J. presented an inventory done by Diana Bolander, Horticulturist, of the garden Ella Holz created. The garden has been left unattended and has been quite a task to weed. The Eagan Garden Club has agreed to take on the maintenance of the garden. Rollie and Don have done a substantial amount of weeding. Attached is the inventory of Ella's garden. Tours: Dates were targeted for Task Force tours of other historic farms. Initially identified are Gibbs Farm, Oliver Kelly Farm, dodge Nature Center and the Brooklyn Park Historical Farm. September 9 and October 7 are tentative dates for tours. Jon will set up tours that will look at the "behind the scenes" workings of their operations. Boesel Farm Auction: Lee enjoyed bidding on a variety of items for use at Holz Farm. Among the treasures he obtained were: A Grain Binder Small Potato Planter Cultivators Ice Tongs Grain Scoops Various hitches for horse-drawn equipment The grain binder will be stored at the Holz Farm site. Don Holz has also been checking into re-obtaining some of the original artifacts from the farm. Ted Wachter and Ken Vraa have given Jon names of individuals who may have old farm equipment to sell. Ted recently got word of a windmill that's available. C.J. is talking with Opus Corporation about wood and hardware from the farm on their Yankee Doodle site. Those are notes as recalled from the July 26 meeting of the Holz Farm Task Force. HolzFarm/Julymtg PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK STUDY By Amy Sievers August 14, 1995 Background The pedestrian crosswalk issue was brought to the attention of the Parks and Recreation Subcommittee in (June, 1995). Concerned residents from the Wedgewood neighborhood felt, there needed to be some action taken by the City to put in a flashing light on the pedestrian crosswalk on Wilderness Run Road at Wedgewood Road. The residents are concerned about the safety of pedestrians, especially children, who are crossing into the park. The purpose of the pedestrian crosswalk study and survey is discovery. The City of Eagan wanted to find out the number of pedestrians crossing into the parks, compared to the vehicle traffic amounts. I started this project without any data on how the pedestrian crosswalks are used near City parks. My goal was to find out as much information about crossing at various sites through observation and surveying every fifth pedestrian who use the crosswalks. Site Selection The first site chosen to survey was Wilderness Run at Wedgewood. After discussion with Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation, and Tom Colbert, Public Works Director, seven additional sites were chosen. Five neighborhood collector streets were chosen and are as follows. Wilderness Run at Wedgewood, Northview Park Road at Savannah, Johnny Cake Ridge Road at the Highline Trail access, Elrene Road to Bridle Ridge Park and Coachman Road to Quarry Park. Neighborhood collectors are roads which are meant to collect vehicle traffic within a neighborhood of usually one square mile. (Comprehensive Guide Plan, City of Eagan) Next, I chose three community collectors, Rahn Road at the Highline Trail access, Covington Lane at Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Lexington Ave at Wilderness Run Road. These types of roads are described as roads which are intended to carry traffic along the edge of a neighborhood and possibly across the entire community. (Comprehensive Guide Plan, City of Eagan) The eight sites were scheduled at various times of the day over a two week period. Each site was surveyed at 8-10 a.m., 12-3 p.m. and 5-8 p.m. Six of the eight sites were scheduled over two Saturdays depending on how the sites ended up on the schedule Survey Development/Observation A short survey was also written to be administered to pedestrians who crossed at each site. (Enclosed survey) The survey was made up of eight questions which took about 3 to 5 minutes to complete. The questions were simple enough to answer "yes" or "no" but left room for additional comments and discussion. From these surveys I hoped to learn more about those who cross at these locations. I wanted input on what things go through their minds before crossing the street. I also hoped to gather comments from young people. If children are using the crosswalks, I '7/. wanted to find out what instructions or rules they were given about crossing. For the most part I just wanted to get personal view points from the pedestrians. Further discovery was gained through observation. Survey tabulation sheets from each site have recorded observations on activity in the parks and on the street near the crosswalk. A tally was also kept for one hour at each site of vehicle traffic. These times were 8:30 - 9:30 a.m., 12:30 - 1:30 p.m. and 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. on weekdays and 7:30 - 8:30 a.m., 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. and 6:30 - 7:30 p.m. on Saturday. For this project, over 80 hours of field work was completed. I surveyed 85 of the 360 pedestrians who crossed at the eight locations. 2 ~a. SUV VIES C UIES1FII'UNS,: 1. Are you a resident of Eagan? yes(what neighborhood) no(what community) 2. Where are you going? 3. How often do you come to this location? once per week/several times per week/every day per week 73. 6. Do you feel this pedestrian crosswalk has adequate markings to alert drivers that people may be crossing? 7. Was there anything else that hindered your ability to cross? 8. In your opinion, is this a good place for pedestrians to cross? -could you suggest a better place? 71 o~. I DRAWING NO. U - 39 INTERSECTION OF: WILDERNESS RUN ROAD & WEDGEWOOD DR. rsq LKI U I I LJ I i I Q I I I 0 WILDERNESS RUN ROAD ° I I I ~ I ~ = STOP SIGN I I 0 I 0 I Q= PED X-ING LU ADVANCE 0 PED X-ING 0 LLJ DATA Site One Wilderness Run Road at Wedgewood Road Number of Pedestrians crossing: 8-10 a.m. 0 12-3 p.m. 11 5-8 p. M. 11 Saturday 1-4 p.m. 6 Vehicle Traffic: 8:30-9:30 a.m. 70 12:30-1:30 p.m. 67 5:30-6:30 p.m. 149 Saturday 1:30-2:30 p.m. 90 The overall impression of those surveyed at this site was that this crossing is not safe for pedestrians. Many people are concerned about the curve in the road from the east, which leaves a blind sight for those crossing from the (south) neighborhood side to the park. Children are taught to "listen" for cars along with "looking" for cars. Those who were surveyed, feel that the speed of the cars on Wilderness Run Road is excessive. Time of day is also a factor. People feel that evening vehicle traffic is much faster than afternoon traffic. People have commented that they might have to wait several minutes before crossing, because on an average there are 2.5 vehicles per minute during the evening. An adult that was surveyed told me that "all parks in Eagan should have stop signs". This person felt that with many children using the parks, a stop sign at all locations would be a good idea. I found in my observations that this crosswalk is hard to get across. The line of trees along the curve from the east greatly reduces visibility for pedestrians. The times that I was stationed at this site the vehicle speed did not seem excessive. From what I observed, vehicles were aware of the crosswalk and many would slow down as they passed through the area and then speed up after passing through. A few cars even stopped before the crosswalk. The number of pedestrians crossing here was minimal. There were many more using the trail on the (north) park side of Wilderness Run Road. The evening shift from 5 - 8'p.m. showed a comparison of 11 crossing and 34 traveling along the trail. This data is important in determining what should be done at this crosswalk. A recommendation for the City would be to investigate ownership of the trees (land) along the curve on the south side of Wilderness Run Road. I would suggest trimming back or cutting some of the trees to increase the visibility for people crossing at this location. Another problem that can be solved long before the park is used is the landscaping and planning process. Along the boulevard on the park side there is a line of young trees. At this stage of growth, the leaves of the trees make it difficult to see vehicles coming from the west. This problem is feasible to be solved by checking sight lines for pedestrians before landscaping and development begins. The vehicle traffic would also benefit from this removal or trimming, to better see the pedestrians in the crossing. Tree removal may seem like a drastic measure, but the visibility and sight lines need to be taken into consideration at this location. 3 16. Two DRAWING NO. u-32 INTERSECTION OF: NORTHVIEW PARK RD. SAVANNAH RD. o zo I ~ I I Z I I I I Q I I > I I NORTHVI W PARK E RD. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L---------------- U = STOP SIGN I N I Site Two Northview Park Road at Savannah Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10 a.m. 6 12-3 p.m. 24 5-8 p.m. 34 Saturday 1-4:00 p.m. 0 Vehicle Traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 76 12:30-1:30 p.m. 124 5:30-6:30 p.m. 248 Saturday 12:30-1:30 p.m. 42 The overall impression from those who cross at this location is that this is a satisfactory place to cross. Those surveyed looked surprised when I asked them if this location had adequate markings to alert drivers of the crosswalk. Every person stated "no". The reason for this unanimous answer is because there are no markings at this location. People felt that vehicle traffic is minimal enough to be able to cross here. "It is the most convenient" stated one adult. Those surveyed are most concerned with vehicle speed, but the traffic is spaced such that there is time to get across. The only problem that people face here are the amount of parked vehicles that line the (south) or park side of the street during athletic events. People crossing here discussed this problem with me. Many have children on bikes or in strollers and cannot locate the curb cut because it is blocked by a vehicle. Another concern about this location is the curve on the Northview Park Road from the east. Many surveyed commented on the poor visibility because of the curve in the road from the east. Through observation I found that the vehicle traffic is sporadic. At times, such as 12:30 - 1:30 p.m. traffic can be steady, on an average 2 vehicles per minute, possibly people coming home for lunch breaks. The curve in the road is also a factor at this location. On two separate locations I observed a young child (possible 8-12 years old) on her bike trying to cross from the north of Northview Park Road to the south. She was very cautious about crossing. Several times she would look left then right, then to me and so forth, for at least 2 minutes. Each time she looked to me for guidance and the "ok" to get across. Each time she thanked me, with a look of relief that she made it across safely. I questioned her the second time and she stated that 4 couldn't see if cars were coming". She also told me that it was more difficult at night. On two occasions I was observing during athletic events, one evening and one Saturday tournament. The first time I watched a vehicle pull over to park and began to cover the curb cut, he then looked at me and backed up to leave it open. The other time the curb cut was half covered when I arrived. Small children on bikes or people with strollers would have a difficult time making it over a large curb. I also noticed that the curb cut was not painted to alert drivers not to park over it. Most surveyed felt this was a good place for people to cross, many asked if the City was going to put in a stop sign. My observation along with most people, is that this is a good place for pedestrians to cross. The 4 vehicle traffic can be a problem at times but it is a convenient place for those who live in the neighborhood north of the park. Some suggestions that I would make are to paint the curb cut yellow to let vehicles know they should not park there. Also, markings on the road for the pedestrians leading to the curb cut and signage to alert vehicles. There are many people crossing at this location during the afternoons and evening. These changes might help reduce the frustration during athletic events. 5 79. DRAWING NO. C -98 INTERSECTION OF: SHALE LA. & RAHN RD. SHALE LA. I { O I I ~ I Z I I Q I c I ~ I O HIGHLINE TR. I a o a o a o o { '0 I I = STOP SIGN I Q = ADVANCE BIKE X-ING 1 I Site Three Rahn Road at the Highline Trail access Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10 a.m. 7 12-3 p.m. 5 5-8 p. M. 48 Vehicle Traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 56 12-30-1:30 p.m. 204 5:30-6:30 p.m. 160 The opinion of all surveyed at this site stated that this is a good place for pedestrians to cross. The only negative comments I encountered were problems with vehicle speed. People are concerned about the vehicles coming from the stop sign at Shale Lane and not seeing the crosswalk because of the fast forward motion from a complete stop. Another comment from a pedestrian was that the people crossing are more cautious than the vehicles. An adult that was surveyed, gave two reasons why this is a good place for pedestrians to cross. One, the stop signs at Shale Lane help slow down the vehicles approaching the crosswalk and two, the visual opportunities both from the north and south are good. He also noted that this crosswalk is better than Blackhawk Road at the Highline Trail access. Overall those surveyed feel that this crosswalk has adequate markings to alert drivers that people may be crossing at this location. Many people love this trail and use it many times during the week. This location was full of activity. It was a good place to gather information and talk to pedestrians. From my view point, I feel that this crosswalk can have a large volume of vehicles, seems to be well marked and heavily used by pedestrians. I did not get a chance to observe during a busy time of the athletic season, but did see quite a few cars lining the west side of Rahn Road. Vehicles seemed to use caution when traveling near the ball fields and parked cars. The stop sign at Shale Lane does have an impact on the crosswalk. Vehicles seemed aware that there was a crossing just after the stop sign. Most did not speed up until they had passed the crosswalk. The small pedestrian stop signs at the end of the trail are also an important part of this crosswalk. Pedestrians are made aware of a busy street ahead because of these signs. Although some people do not use them, I noticed many children would come to a complete stop and sometimes get off their bikes before crossing. Children are aware of this busy intersection and most are taught to obey signs. Even though there is a large volume of vehicle traffic, I observed that this location is a good place for pedestrians to cross. Sight lines are adequate and most of the pedestrians are cautious before they cross Rahn Road. 6 fi ' S? 4 Foci r I DRAWING NO. U-2.4 II I I INTERSECTION OF: 4 ' 1 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD. & 1 I HIGHLINE TR.• UV 1 i I1 = 1 r I z ' r n r r cr? r r r = BIKE X-ING r o r r ~ r r r r o r 1 r RAIL LINE r HIGH Site Four Johnny Cake Ridge Road at Highline Trail access Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10:00 a.m. 18 12-3:00 p.m. 9 5-8:00 p.m. 2 Saturday 7-10:00 a. m. 12 Number of vehicles 8:30-9:30 a.m. 35 12:30-1:30 p.m. 54 5:30-6:30 p.m. 128 Saturday 7:30-8:30 a.m. 40 The overall opinion from those surveyed at this'site was that this location is a good place to cross. People were not concerned with volume of traffic as much as vehicular speed. Many felt that if a car was coming fast, there was always enough space between cars to get across. People also felt that because the crossing falls within a school zone, cars are more aware of pedestrians that may be crossing. One person noted that many times vehicles will stop before the crosswalk to let a pedestrian get across. Another adult said that she liked this trail because when she crosses there is minimal traffic. One problem that pedestrians discussed with me, was the speed of vehicles coming from the south around the curve. The concern is that children have trouble making judgements on how fast cars are moving. Adults on the other hand, have a better sense of how vehicles operate. One person surveyed did not feel this was a good place to cross. He felt that the cars are not aware of the bike path, and that a flashing light would help. From my observations, I found this location to be quiet, peaceful and a good place for pedestrians to cross. At times I did observe children and young adults crossing at Woodgate Lane and then continuing on the Highline Trail traveling north. Even though there were 128 vehicles tallied one hour during the evening shift, there were not many pedestrians crossing to cause much difficulty. Morning and afternoon shifts vehicle traffic is very light, there was ample space between vehicles for pedestrians to cross. The pedestrian stop signs for the most part are being used. The reason for them not to be used may be because of the light vehicle traffic in the area. Saturday mornings are much the same, light vehicle and pedestrian traffic. There were more people tallied as "not crossing" than those who did cross at this location. When pedestrians were crossing there usually was no wait for vehicle traffic, many just slowed and continued along the trail. People enjoy the Highline Trail because of its beauty and minimal traffic. As this area continues to grow, will the vehicle traffic increase? This crosswalk is well marked both on the street and with good signage, I did not observe any problems with crossing at this location. 7 '3 . DRAWING NO. C - 30 INTERSECTION OF: COVINGTON LA. & Q © JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD. E 0a w II < I I I ! I I _ I ° 00000000 COVINGTON LA. I i ~ ~ { of Ili I I I I I = STOP SIGN 0 = PED X-ING = PED X-ING ADVANCE WARNING 0~ Site Five Covington Lane at Johnny Cake Ridge Road • Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10:00 a.m. 4 12-3:00 p.m. 5 5-8:00 p.m. 26 Saturday 6-9:00 p.m. 35 Vehicle traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 221 12:30-1:30 p.m. 160 5:30-6:30 p.m. 380 Saturday 6:30-7:30 p.m. 162 The opinion of pedestrian surveyed was mixed. Some felt it was a good place for adults to cross but not children. Others said it was a good place and some said it was not a good place to cross. There were even a few people who said that it depended on the time of day for easy crossing. People crossing are concerned about the children who are trying to cross alone or in small groups. They feel that it is easier for an adult to see the vehicles coming up the hill from the south than young children. Many who were surveyed wanted a flashing light and two suggested a covered bridge over Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Another concern is when there is construction on Cedar Ave or Highway 35E, Johnny Cake becomes an alternate route for-many vehicles, therefore increasing vehicle counts. Those surveyed also talked about the speed and volume of vehicles on Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The speed is always there and the volume of vehicles usually comes in "spurts" as one pedestrian noted. These "spurts" are possibly caused by the traffic light at Cliff Road. Pedestrians are also concerned about many trucks and recreational vehicles that travel along Johnny Cake, which makes it more difficult to cross. Almost all of the pedestrians surveyed did not feel that there was a better place to cross. Many said that they would not allow their children to go near Cliff Road, which is more dangerous. One pedestrian did suggest to go further south on Johnny Cake to cross. Another said a better place would be all the way to 145th Street, which is a long way from the park. At certain times, usually in the evening, pedestrians stated that it could take several minutes to cross at this location. The general feelings I got from these pedestrians was that this is a dangerous spot for pedestrians especially children to cross. My observations at this location are much the same as the people crossing here. It is a busy spot, with over 300 vehicles, 50 cars per minute, traveling on Johnny Cake in an one-hour evening tally. From my observations, the vehicles on Johnny Cake seem to be exceeding the speed limit. Many who were turning onto Covington Lane were traveling so fast that often their tires squealed as they made the turn. I watched children with adults cross and many times the adult told the children to "watch for cars" and "never cross here without mom or dad". One teenager I spoke with was concerned about young children crossing at this location. He told me that it was easier for him because he was bigger and could control his bike better than younger children. He crosses at this location because it is the most convenient for himself and his friends. Most pedestrians do not cross here, they usually stay on the east side of the trail and walk up to Cliff Road and then turn around and come back. 8 ~5. The volume of vehicles varied throughout the day at this location. For example, volume dropped considerably after 7:00 p.m. and after 1:00 p.m. During the morning shift, volume became heavier after 8:30 a.m. and then slowed around 10:00 a.m. This is a difficult location to cross. There are many vehicles along with a large amount of pedestrians, most in the evening. I do not feel that this is a good place for pedestrians to cross. Johnny Cake Ridge Road is a four lane road and vehicles seem to travel over the speed limit often. There are no trees that would block the sight lines of a pedestrian trying to cross. The difficulty is the speed of the vehicles and the hill coming from the south. It is hard to determine what can be done to solve this problem. the vehicles do not seem aware that people are crossing at this location. Changing the speed limit along Johnny Cake Ridge Road might not have an affect on the speed of the vehicles. People may become immune to the speed limit change or a flashing light. A possible option could be rumble strips (cut outs in the pavement) to alert drivers to the upcoming crossing. The City (Engineering Department) is currently researching the use of rumble strips on roadways. 9 DRAWING NO. INTERSECTION LEXINGTON AVE WILDERNESS RUN LJV w X20 > z I I I 0 I I z ' I I i WILDERNESS RUN RD. _ oaooaoooo,~ II III 7IC' = STOP SIGN (7. Site Six Wilderness Run Road at Lexington Avenue Number of pedestrians crossing 8-10:00 a.m. 8 12-3:00 p.m. 26 5-8:00 p.m. 44 Vehicle traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 168 12:30-1:30 p.m. 153 5:30-6:30 p.m. 351 The overall opinion of those surveyed at this location was that this is not a good place for pedestrians to cross. People crossing here are concerned about the poor visibility, the volume and the speed of the vehicles coming from the north on Lexington Avenue. Most people say it is more difficult with small children, because it takes them longer to cross. One adult discussed the idea of putting small stop signs at the end of the trail to alert pedestrians that this is a busy intersection. Another pedestrian thought there could be a four way stop during the summer months for vehicles. Most people talked about having to "move fast" when crossing at this location. Some pedestrians stated that they have to run across to avoid vehicles. Children who must cross alone or in small groups have a difficult time crossing at this location. An adult said that the children do not have the same judgement ability as adults. Another adult does not let his children cross alone at any time of the day. One suggestion that came up often was to trim back the trees along the west side of Lexington to increase the visibility for pedestrians and vehicles. The speed of the cars on Lexington is also a concern of these pedestrians. They often feel that the vehicles are traveling over the speed limit and are not paying attention to the signs or the crosswalk. People would like to see more signs or a flashing light at this location. Those who cross here do not feel the current signage is adequate. Some suggested crossing at a location further south, such as at Tiffany Drive. The problem with that location is the trail on the east side of Lexington. People would have to walk across private property to get on the trail at Wilderness Run Road. The pedestrians are concerned that there will be many accidents at this location, because of the many children crossing here. In my observation, this location is extremely busy with people and vehicles. From 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. I was amazed that 351 vehicles travelled in front of me on Lexington Avenue. During the evening shift 44 people tried to cross Lexington Avenue. The morning shift was the only time vehicle traffic wasn't so heavy. There seemed to be ample space between vehicles for pedestrians to cross at that time. But vehicles are still moving fast from the north on Lexington and sometimes do not seem to notice the crosswalk. As afternoon approached I observed a group of young children on bikes. The entire group stopped their bikes and sat down at the end of the trail, it seemed they were waiting for something or someone. Soon after that an adult with two children, riding bikes with training wheels, rode up to the group. The adult explained to them the difficulty of crossing at this 10 If' intersection. She then walked her bike halfway out into the street and then quickly back, it was not safe. She tried again and stood in the middle of the crosswalk as the eight children walked their bikes across. One car had to stop for the group and waited until the adult cleared the crosswalk. This method seemed to work well for this adult. The volume of cars increased between 12:30 and 1:30 p.m. Children were coming for Parks and Recreation's Summer in the Park program. I found that the children who crossed Lexington seemed older such as 10-12 years old. If a younger (6-8) person was coming to the program, they were almost always with an older child. I spoke with a group leader from the program who told me that almost all of the older children come from the west on the Highline Trail and cross Lexington Avenue. ' Many of the adults crossing at this location were on lunch breaks which made it difficult to talk with them. Those who did pause for a moment were concerned about the combination of vehicles and children at this location. The evening shift was hectic. the vehicles on Lexington seemed to be traveling at high speeds. I observed a few pedestrians who stopped at Lexington and then turned around so they wouldn't have to cross the busy road. At one point I helped a group of children with their grandmother cross Lexington. I walked one of the younger girls bike across, and it was difficult to judge the speed and location of the vehicles. Like many people, I did not feel comfortable crossing at this location. Lexington Avenue is, based on my observation, a dangerous road to cross. From those surveyed, to my observations, and my experience crossing here, the level of pedestrian crosswalk signalization requires review. The site lines are not adequate for pedestrians. It is difficult based on my study, to determine the best option for this location. 11 Si 2u er DRAWING NO. INTERSECTION OF: ELRENE RD. & NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD P I p I 0_ I I I Z I ( I ' QJ I I ALI wm ELRENE RD. ° ° I o I o I 'I I cy- I Y I I I I Q I I I ' ! I I 3 K-- = STOP SIGN LLJ = PED X-ING w O = ADVANCE PED X-ING O • Z I Site Seven Elrene Road to Bridle Ridge Park Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10:00 a.m. 9 12-3:00 p.m. 11 5-8:00 p.m. 17 Saturday 6-9:00 p.m. 4 Vehicle traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 72 12:30-1:30 p.m. 59 5:30-6:30 p.m. 57 Saturday 6:30-7:30 p.m. 30 The opinion of this location from pedestrians was mixed. About half of those surveyed felt this was a good place to cross and the other half did not. The concern of those who did not is the speed of the vehicles on Elrene Road. They feel that vehicles from the east are travelling over the speed limit and do not notice the pedestrian crosswalk at all. Those who feel that it is a good place to cross, said that the gap between cars was adequate enough to get across. They also talked about the light volume of vehicles on Elrene. People did not think there were many vehicles to contend with on a regular basis. Most said that it depends on the time of day when vehicle traffic. is heavier, usually in the evening. Others did not feel there was proper signage for vehicles. One adult felt it was a natural place for a yield or stop sign. Another said that this location was better than Wescott. From my observations, I find this a good location to cross. The vehicle traffic compared to pedestrian traffic is low enough for people to cross without difficulty. I did notice a few vehicles that seemed to be driving over the speed limit, but it was not every vehicle. There was good use of the playground, basketball court and soccer field, but those people drove to the location. I noticed that many people who jog and walk alone do not use the crosswalk. They cut the corner from the east to southwest diagonally and continue on the trail. People who use the crosswalk are often with children, either in strollers or on bikes. This location has adequate markings to alert drivers of the crossing. In my opinion, it is a good place for pedestrians to cross. 12 q1. Site Eight Coachman Road at Quarry Park (Drawing not available) Number of Pedestrians crossing 8-10:00 a.m. 0 12-3:00 p.m. 0 5-8:00 p.m. 3 Vehicle traffic 8:30-9:30 a.m. 70 12:30-1:30 p.m. 153 5:30-6:30 p.m. 357 At this location there was only one group who crossed Coachman Road to use the park. From their survey, they do not feel that this is a good location to cross. These adults with one child on a bike are concerned with the speed of the vehicles on Coachman Road. The markings are not adequate because there are no markings to alert drivers that pedestrians may be crossing here. They talked about children crossing on bikes which is harder because they are small. At times they must wait for vehicle traffic but it is usually minimal. It is more difficult in the evening. This location was interesting. I found that most of the pedestrians are using trail on the east or west side of Coachman Road and do not cross. Many are walking or biking to the convenience store on the corner of Yankee Doodle and Coachman and then going back on the trail. Others going to the store would walk down the trail to the driveway entrance of the store and cross at that point. Most people who use the park either drove vehicles or came from the north and did not need to cross. At one time there were six other vehicles in the parking lot. These people would pull in and park to eat lunch, read or relax for about an hour at a time. The morning vehicle traffic did not seem to exceed the limit, but afternoon and evening the speed of cars seemed to increase. The volume of vehicles also increased as the day progressed. There is a large volume of vehicles in the evening but not many pedestrians crossing to use the park. I talked with an employee from Facility Maintenance who told me that earlier in the summer she observed the same group of young men playing basketball everyday. I did not observe this group during the afternoon shift. If people were crossing here, the most difficult time would be in the evening. A pool in the apartment complex courtyard across Coachman maybe a place where people like to stay. There were people swimming each time I arrived at this location. I would feel uneasy about crossing at this location in the evening. There are no markings on the street to tell pedestrians where to cross. It would be interesting to find out if people would cross at this location more if there were markings. 13 pia . Summation From my research much discovery was made. I found that all but 2 of the pedestrians crossing at these locations are Eagan residents. The people of Eagan are generally out in the evening, with their families. They have a genuine concern for safety along with preserving the beauty of the City of Eagan. People do not want to cut down trees, but they would like to be able to see vehicles approaching crossings. Many were also pleased to see that discovery of crosswalks by the City is being done. Their biggest concern is that it will only be discovery and not action. Overall my observations were that pedestrians crossing into parks were children with adults or youth ages 10 and up alone. This study did not look at other destinations of pedestrians, such as fast food restaurants or shopping malls. It is difficult to determine the difference between parks and other locations at this time. I found that planning for pedestrians is an important part of development in any city. People enjoy beautiful plantings and many trees, but they seem to become a hindrance of enjoyment. These plantings are making it difficult for people to cross streets to come to the parks for fun, which should be its main purpose. Planners would be wise to stand on corners and along curves to get an actual view of what it would be like to cross with a line of trees blocking out vehicles. They could also work with residents who might be crossing at the location for feedback. This project is only a small part of what the City of Eagan should do to study crossings. I hope that this research will give you, Commission Members, an idea of what is happening in this community. It will give the City a resource for data and a piece of information that can be used in dealing with residents at these locations., Further study may be needed at some of these locations in order to have more concrete data, this research is just the beginning. I have enjoyed talking with the residents of Eagan, who are excited about the City and the parks. a:pedcross.ing 14 7~