Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
4150 Blueberry Cir
CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHON E: 454-8100 t ? ' ) c BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # To be used for SF DWG/GAR Est. Value $72,000 Date SEPTEMBER 7 19 84 Site Ad?re s 4150 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect R3 Occupancy Lot 1 Block Sec/Sub. HILLTOP EST Remodel ? Zoning Parcel No. Repair ? Type of Const:. Enlarge ? No. Stori s of Name SUNSHINE CONSP e ? Move ? e Length -- Z Address 1471 THOMAS LN Demolish ? Depth 4 6 EAGAN 431-220 Grade El Sq. Ft. City Phone o Nam a S ?' uu Address ~ City Phone vac ift?ME .Z. :TILL w Name J =Z Address <W City P, ,C)(i..1<atJ1Oi one 884-3029 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and• gr e to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes.<c X ity of Ec 9w r ones. Signature of Permittee SW SHINE CONST Approvals Fees Assessment Water & Sew. Police Fire Eng. Planner Council Bldg. Off. 9 6 4 APC Var. Date . 0 Permit Surcharge 36.00 Plan check 174.50 SAC 525.00 Water Conn. 470.00 Water Meter 63.00 Road Unit 260, 0 0 Parks Total $1, 877.50 A Building Permit Is issued to: ' on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordant with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. ; ? ?_ i• v Building Official Permit No. Permit Holder Date Plumbing 2-4 50, qlad q ? H.VA.C. rD d1 ?,:5 r 0 ` y -FV Electric 4 9 5 Y? iO •?? 7s,dg Softener Inspection Date Insp. Other Footings Foundation Framing Rough Plbg. g Rough HVAC 10-ROY insulation Final Plbg. p.. d? Final HVAC Final l? Cert/Occ. Water Describe Location: Well Sewer Pr. Disp. Receipt ?PLUMBING PERMIT Permit No. CITY OF EAGAN Fee Fill in numbered spaces S/C Type or Print legibly Tot. a t) 1. Date 2. Installation Cost '`rjo ii II-,e(f7 3. Job Address BIk. / Tract 4. Owner .?= 5. Contractor r/ l c -I'1 L ! T.. f Phones t 6. Address 7. City ?? State Zip 8. Building Type: Residential 11/'`y Commercial El Institutional ? Add ? Alter ? Repair ? 9. Work Description: New Er-- 10. Describe . 11. 12. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply wit all ordinances a??etsgoverning this type of work. Signed _ ?'%r t k // Rough Finsl lnspecy6ns: Date Insp. Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved CITY OF EAGAN 454.8100 No. t tures ater Closet No. Fixtures Cesspool/Drainfield __ Bath tubs Septic Tank f Lavatory Softner Shower Well Kitchen Sink Urinal/Bidet Other Laundry Tray / Floor Drains Drinking Ftn. Slop Sink Gas Piping Outlets Receipt + 0 (? / MECHANICAL PERMIT V CITY OF EAGAN Fill in numbered spaces ` Type or Print legibly 1. Date 1L! 2. Installation Cost 3. Job Address'Yr Lot Blk. 4. Owner Ce ,4j _T Permit No. T Fee S/C_ _ Tot. y . d ^? / 1,•/// / Tract 5. Contractor 'Llkb Ili ( Phone 7 3 ?? 6. Address 2 B9r C/?6 7 1,06k?'n 7. City C? State Zip =s'y 8. Building Type: Residential L9" Commercial ? Institutional ? 9. Work Description: New ' Add ? Alter ? Repair ? 10. Describe 11. Fuel Type (:SAS No. ? Equipment BTU - M. Ea. Forced Air No. Equipment CFM Air Handlin : Mfg. g Boilers Mfg. Mech. Exhaust Unit Heater Mfg. Other Air Cond. Mfg. Gas, Piping Outlets 12. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply with all ordinangs and codes governing this type of work. 1 Signed: for Rough Final Inspections: Date Insp. _ Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved CITY OF EAGAN 454-8100 CITY OF EAGAN Remarks Addition HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 14 BIk 7 Parcel Owner Street 4150 Blueberry =(' t?tateEagan, 55123 of Blueberry Lane Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF. --- '4 :j 1980 1336 77 133 67 10 66837 Anl.ILZLR4 R-28-8 STREET RESTOR. . . GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK Aj 1973 172.14 8.61 20 68.94 [_A014484 8-28-84 * SEWER LATERAL 1990 3118.72 311.87 0 1559.37 A014484 18-28-84 WATERMAIN * WATER LATERAL * WATER AREA SP_rviCAS __ * STORM SEW TRK 1980 * STORM SEW LAT 1980 CURB& GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT Road Unit 260.00 #46135 9-10-84 WATER CONN. 470.00 n T n BUILDING PER. #9487 it !! SAC 525.00 PARK CASH RECEIPT CITY OF EAGAN P. O. BOX 21-199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 DATE 19 RECEIVED. FROM.l,,K,a?..i .? ^n. ?. AMOUNT & DOLLARS 1 00 CASH :::?? HECK ( ...FOR C _ r rS ' , F ND CO E O T AM C..,f y cry j^a Thank Y Ll 7-7 B Y da F" C% .., - 4, ?.r) t AA White-Payers Copy Yellow-Posting Copy Pink-File Copy This request void 18 months from f 1r A 089715 UA ? J-, - saz? Request Date Fire No. Rough-in Inspe tion Required? Ready Now y?p3-?•ill Notify. Inspec- ,?es ?No for When Ready Licensed Electrical Contractor I hereby request inspection of above Owner electrical work installed at: Street Address, Box or Route No. City ,bection No. Tow shipName or No. Range No. County Occup t (PRINT) Phone No. Power Supplier Address Electrica Contractor (Company Name) Contractor's License No. ovi X03 Mailing Addres ontractor or Owner Maki r1WInstai S ignature ( ontractorJOwne along Installatioril Phone Number ..._, IC7 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT Griggs-Midway Bldg. - Room N-191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE BOARD 1821 University Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104 UNLESS PROPER INSPECTION FEE IS Phone 1612) 297-2111 ENCLOSED. (? $ REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION EB-00001-04 ee instructions for coippleting 3dtis form on back of yellow copy. IWO /Of VI g y A nR q.71 ;1 ""X" Below Work Covered by This Request dd Rep. Type of Building Appliances Wired Equipment Wired Home Range Temporary Service Duplex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Building Dryer Electric Heating Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm ci v ther (Specify) ter Specify 0 r Other rmmnre,p lncnorfinn FnetRalnuw # Fee Service Entrance Size # Fee Feeders/Subfeedels # Fee Circuits Q Oto200Amps 0 to 30 Ams 0to30Amps Above 200 Amps 31 to 100 Amps 31 to 100 Amps Swimming Pool Above 100-Am Above 100_Am Transformers Irrigation Boorrs Partial, Other Fee Signs Special Inspection $ TOTA E6 Remarks c f Rough-in ate I, the Ele al Y ?flri/ f Inspector, hereby certify that the above Final to W -,r " inspection has been made. This request void 18 months from RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD, EAGAN MN 55122 651-681-4675 Now Construction Requirements RemodeURepair Requirements • 3 registered site surveys showing sq. ft. of lot, sq. ft, of house; and all roofed areas • 2 copies of plan (20% maximum lot coverage allowed) • 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions • 2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, etc.) • 1 site survey for exterior additions & decks • 1 set of Energy Calculations • Indicate if home served by septic system for additions • 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan if lot platted after 7/1/93 • Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (bldgs with 3 or less units) DATE _ ? l 7 Z VALUATION /ice SITE ADDRESS 5/ 4&/Y l/'[?e MULTI-FAMILY BLDG _ Y _ N TYPE OF WORK126104 ?Y- S/01A16' FIREPLACE(S) - 0 - 1 _ 2 APPLICANT 7O? iJ ?", 125?`?=ti ?L/ STREET ADDRESS S' ,4 44G 7:C /L/) CITY 6xG''/o/L STATE/ "ZIP 9521 TELEPHONE # Z -r-/Z ./SS/V CELL PHONE #6"2 P4'0 - '7 FAX # PROPERTY OWNER TELEPHONE #??r "7- COMPLETE FOR "NEW" RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Energy Code Category NvIINNESOT<? RULES 7670 CATEGORY 1 i?1INNESOTA RULES 7672 ('l submission type) • Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet Submitted ,' 11 I ?5 f r hN,ew E6,60 1? de-Worksheet Submitted • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted Plumbing Contractor: Ph e # _ $90.00 Plumbing system includes: Water Softener - Lawn Fe Water Heater No. of R.I. Baths -- No. of Baths Mechanical Contractor: Phone # Mechanical system includes: -- :fir Conditioning Fee: 570.00 Heat Recovery System Sewer/Water Contractor: Phone # I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinance Signature of Applicant --------- --------------- -------------------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY Certificates of Survey Received Tree Preservation Plan Received _ Not Required _ Updated 4/02 OFFICE USE ONLY ? 01 Foundation O 07 05-plex O 13 18-plex 0 20 Pool ? 30 Accessory Bldg 0 02 SF Dwelling Cl 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace Ci 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi O 03 01 of - plex O 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) 0 33 Ext. Aft - SF O 04 02-plex ? 10 08-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 36 Multi O 05 03-plex ? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage ? 06 04-plex 0 12 12 plex Pibg_Y or - N ? 25 Miscellaneous O 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 32 Addition .? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish (Bldg)* ? 43 Reroof © 46 Windows/Doors O 34 Replacement *Demolition (Entire Bldg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant Valuation Occupancy MC/ES System Census Code Zoning City Water SAC Units Stories Booster Pump Nbr. of Units Sq. Ft. PRV Nbr. of Bldgs Length Fire Sprinklered Type of Cant Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (new bldg) Final/C.O. Footings (deck) r Final/No C.O. Footings (addition) Plumbing Foundation _ HVAC Drain Tile Other Roof Ice & Water Final Pool Ftgs _ Air/Gas Tests Final Framing Siding Stucco Stone Fireplace _ R.I. -Air Test Final Windows (new/replacement) Insulation Retaining Wall Approved By , Building Inspector Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC City SAC Water Supply & Storage S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit License Search Copies Other Total WAIVER OF HEARING NO. 00151 Special Assessments Authorization I/We hereby request and authorize the City of.Eagan, MN (Dakota Co.) to assess the following described property owned by me/us: Lot 14. Blocky Hilltop Estates for the benefit received fr the following improvements ITEM -QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT PROJECT Storm sewer outlet-Lump sum $1,500.00 $1,500.00 481 to be spread over TOTAL $1.5OO.00 15 years at an annual interest rate of against any remaining..unpaid balances. The undersigned, for themselves, their heirs, executors,, administrators successors and assigns, hereby consent to the levy of these assessments, and further, hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary, a wive objections to any technical defects in any proceedings related t` se assessments, and further waive the right to object to or appeal rom these a;'sess nts-made, pursuant to this agreement. Dated: ?I? Ste n W. Reed Ca y L. Re ,STATE OF) COUNTY OF, on this -day of ._ before me a Nota Public within for said County, personally appeared y to and personally known to be the person 5 es rib' in to me described and who a ecuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that executed the same as free at and deed. This Document Drafted By: otar Public Hauge, Smith, hide & seller, P.A. App 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway ? Eagan, Minnesota SS122 L" ??J ..... . (612) 454-4224 ? ' pagan PubTic-V6- ks Director '_... Revised: 8-30-82 BETTY HAUSCHILDT NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY My Commission Expires Apr. 16. 1991 a r, .CITY OF EAGAN N° 9487 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT Receipt .# 3 To be used for SF DWG/GAR Est. Value $72,000 Date SEPTEMBER 7_',9_8 4 Site Address 4150 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect ] Occupancy R3 Lot 14 Block 7 Sec/Sub. HILLTOP EST Remodel ? Zoning RJL Parcel No. Repair ? Type of Const. V Enlarge ? No. Stories I Name SUNSHINE CONST Move ? Length 4 z Address 1471 THOMAS LN Demolish ? Depth 46 City EAGAN -Phone-431-2200 Grade ? Sq. Ft. SAME Approvals Fees ZO Name 0 4i 3249 ' 8 Address Assessment Permit F- City Phone Water & Sew. Surcharge 3 6 . 0 0 ba: JAMES R HILL Police Plan check 174.50 . . WW Name Fire SAC 525.00 8200 HUMBOLDT AVE SO Address Eng. Water Conn. 470, 0 0 <W City BLOOMINGTORone 884-3029 Planner Water Meter 63.00 Council Road Unit 260_ A0 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that Bldg. Off. 9/6/84 Parks the information is correct on a too comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statute on of E Or ntes APC Total1 , 877 , 50 . Var. Date Signature of Permutes A'Building Permit is issued to: SU SHINE CONST on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordant wit II applfiob a St e o nesoto Sta utes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official ?f? ALL CONTRACTORS A 'i) a 4?#I;' MUST BE LICENSED WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN S P, wU.ICaA2, To Be Used For: ,Valuation Site Address: '//S0 ej6e&- tLot: Block:-'7 Sect/Sub : /i/ Parcel #: Owner: -?L us 41.fl e ., Address: /c(7f 'T Ea -e City/Zip Code: ?cz c ?, /?9w .? ? a L Phone #: : Contractor: -5_ 'c S 1 OF PLANS, OF SURVEY Y CALCULATIONS _ Occupancy: Zoning: Type Of Const: # Stories: Length: Depth: Sq. Ft.: Address: Assessments: _ City/Zip Code: Water/Sewer: Police: Phone #: Fire: Engr.: Arch./Eng: Planner: Address: ? C ? ? ? ?,, , ? ??•,l ,? $?, Council : Bldg. Off.: City/Zip Code: APr: INCLUDE © SETS CERTIFICATES ® SET OF ENERG Date: Erect: Remodel: Repair: Enlarge: Move: Demolish: Grade: ?-I ( Permit: ?? 34. Surcharge: 3to . °-° Plan Rev.: X14.? SAC: 525.E Water Conn: .-? 410 Water Meter (y 3. Road Unit: 242 0.I_ Parks: Phone# : Var,, ance : /? 7750 ZC? X ?, s 11 ? c? 4 I 4 Q c s4 RVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 'I SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 ...r 41 - 07 \ N 133 130.00 1/ EpSEM N pR 1NpGE PER jL r75 f I ?c 30 I , 10 L®V 14 I ST \ (ji i Pp I 0? l? I 46.00 15.80% ?y A. C . PRoPOSED O '1 . O v HOUSE \a f o . CnO \.00 t1,94-1e9o cu o Q N GAR i o o\ II 46_64 22. 00 24.00 g89•'?' 89? 9 I ? `? 5 >'? a 16 ?7 m y1 O 30 333 N ° T ?. 50.00 - - - - 45.00 92.4TC. o oB92S 67.5525" E A=7'38'00" ( o Cn M BLUEBERRY CIRCLE 893.0 993 - -?- DENOTES PRO OSED SURFACE DRAINAGE O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET SCALE: 1 INCH = 3o FEET O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR = S9S',o FEET X000.O DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATIOP PROPOSED LOWEST FLOOR = S FEET (000.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF BLOCK = E, a? :A FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY TO SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: Lot 14, Block 7, HILLTOP ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1984. SIGNED. JAMES R. HILL, INC. B. c ? HAROLD C. PETERSON, LAND SURVEYOR MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 12294 PROJECT NO. BOOK / PAGE JAMES R. HILL, INC. 84844 FILE NO 921 5 Planners / Engineers / Surveyors NO. 8200 Humboldt Avenue South FOLDER Bloomington, Mn. 55431 612-884-3029 CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road WATER SERVICE PERMIT P. O. Box 21199 PERMIT NO.: Sb99 Eagan, MN 5121 • ?" DATE: 9-10-84 Zoning: R1 No. of Units: 1 Owners Sunshine Coast Address: Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Circle L14 B7 Hilltop Estates Plumber: Star PlbB Meter No.: Connection Charge: 470.00 pd Size: Account Deposit: 15.00 pd Reader No.: Permit Fee: _ 10.00 pd agree to comply with the City of Eagan Surcharge: . 50 pd Ordinances. Misc. Charges: 63.00 pd-meter, Total: By Date Paid: Date of Insp.. Ins : p. CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road SEWER SERVICE PERMIT P. O. Box 21199 PERMIT NO.: 6889 Eagan, MN 5,17,' DATE: Zoning: 9: U No. of Units: 1 Owner: Sunshine Const Address: Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Circle L14 B7 Hilltop Estates Plumber: Star Plb 9--10--84 46135 100. 007-? I agree to comply with the City of Eagan Connection Charge: 425.00 pd Ordinances. Account Deposit: 15.00 pd Permit Fee: 1101.00 Pd Surcharge: Pd- By Mi h sc. C arges: Date of Insp.: Total: Insp.: Dat P id: e a CITY OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT EXTEJIOR MAGE "U" CO$ UTATION (To be submitted' with building permit application) One or two family dwelling Owner All other Contractor Site address 1WG w yT, Date one 1,190 Sqi r. srWT EA rf LINEAL FT. OF EXPOSED WALL_ 'S•E WO ?j ft. above grade - 2114Z ? Z TOTAL EXPOSED WALL v. FT. OPAQUE WALL CONSTRUCTION: "U" value x area LO4LA.' "U" ? D?" ..... x s q . f t . • D - 95 (U) (A ?°, C• Rim "u" "U" . 4(pel x sq. .O x sq. ft. . ? (U)(A ft Ilo. O - . (U)(A Detail reference "U" x sq. . ft. (U)(A from "U" x sa. ic. (U)(A attached sheets "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A "U" x s 1' ft - (U)(A "U" x sq. ft. (U)(A "U" x sq. ft. (U) (A "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A II NDOWS : "U" value x area flake & type sen wsRK T »u" sq. .. 2- f 141•loO - 7343 (U } ( A x sq. t. (U.UA "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A. " " "u" x sq. ft. - (U)(A "U . x sq. ft. - (U)(A` "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A BOORS : "U" value x area Make & type m L. bP "4# "U" .14 _x sq. - u ' ft. .C .. _ 5, (U) (A . • ft 4 (U) ( - x 3q. _ 4? . Q . ?, . A w w "U" x sq. ft.. - (U) (A "U« x sq. ft. - (U)(A: TOTALS 2 1420M f t . 2&?? (u) TOTAL (U) (A) VALUES 2Coq,2? - )IVIDED BY TOTAL WALL AREA ZJ4213Z • lZ VERAGE "U" or less for 1 & 2 family dwellings , or less for all other buildings fOOF/CEILING: 'OTA L AREA : 190 -sq. ft. retail reference "U" •42& x sq. ft. O - 27.37 (U) (A ) from "U" x sq. ft. - (U) (A ) attached sheets. "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A) ,ascribe openings "U" x sq. ft. - (U)(A) in roof. "U" x sq. ft. - (U) (A ) OTA ( 37 X7 TOTALS //?O Sq. -" ft.. 7.-S7 (U)(A U)(A) VALUES L , 40 VG " V IVIDED BY TOTAL ROOF/ /1'?0 •a23 ? CEILING AREA oz("' VERAGE "U" , for ventilated roofs for all other construction --? WALL 'DgUMIN\t* "U" VALUa,!E? s?c.T 100 Al 1 c F, t4PLL, VIM, AND co,, NBLK. ROOF / CEILING (R) VALUE Q It'TE Dr AM F(LM O.&( sfsu P. Bia, , 54 ® INSULA'jIOt e Q,? O ExTERlolz FIR FILM .Cot (STILL) U" oZ3 TOTAL ( R) 41,78 WALL. (1z) VALUE Q ' It'TER-IOF- AIR f lLM O. (c8 G) I/?" GYP. ZD.- `}-5 3qs' INSULATION 13 co to MAoNITe- IDIN(,i li EXTEIdtZ AM FILM . i? 11 Ull OTAL T R) 7-03, IIm (t?) VALVE ?z INT .t'-Iotz Aw F ILV ©. ?g 5 l/z" INSULATION 19, o© I FttV- Tz tM JolsT I . Ss 15 & "" @) MAG6t,1ITE. 5tc '(, •lol 0 XT ' - AIR FILM , 1-1 "U`' TOTAL (i? ouNOOrt (Iz) VALUE D IO TEIZIotL AI t& FILM 0. crrac,,LK, 1.23 ?z -i3 EXTEIzIoR Alf FILM I'l 11ull _ 111Z = .4(p TOTAL ( tc = , ,I Gam 1?lrxc.. Z 14z?3Z 1- .fi Goo 106,/Z l'!/h l t le,Lv f? 1?1l?1DOCL?s /4l.too ovF r x rD 1, y' - I c 2 ;; ZX17.5= 3? JJ?o 2X 7 =• 1 zx4 = - /S 2/84 CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR PERMIT SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION (PLEASE PRINT) 1) PROPER'T'Y ADDRESS : LF AL DESCRT_PTIC:I : /-07L / y /-) (Lot/31ock/Subdi.vision or Tax Parcel I.D. Number) STRUCTURE, DATE OF ORIGINAL EiJILDI: G P=-'_'- 11T ISS A.Nrt PRES : `II r/PFCPOS^ USE: - l S,IGI,- r FAAI 1LY --_' -? O R-2 DUPLEX (`IWO UNITS) D R-3 TOWNHOUSE (THREE + UNITS) ( UNITS) R-4 APARTf'EN7/CO1\1Da%1TNIU: I ( UNITS)') Q COP-MERCIAL/RETAIL. /OFFICE Q INDUSTRIAL ? INSTITUTIONAL/GOVNMENT 2) APPLTC?Vr (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS: J/ 17/ Cum S. ?? CITY, STATE, ZIP: ?< Ss°?ZL PHONE: 3) Pu.TIBER NAME Ch?{- ASE PRINT) . ft FOR CITY USE ONLY : J V ... w _ a ADDRESS: Q S' Q PLUM RS LICENSE: " Active CITY, STATE, ZIP: 0 ] Expired PHONE: ? MAb it lJ S' •- / PLUMBER LICENSE # Not of Reyord Starr initial 4) OCCUPANT/Ot$T (PLEASE PRINT) NAME : ----? ADDRESS ; ? CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: 5) INDICATE WHICH PERMIT IS BEING REQUESTED: CONNECTION TO CITY SEWER CONNECTION TO CITY WATER ? O THER (PLEASE DESCRIBE) 6) I:DIC,?:: ONE: [J PLEASE HOLD APPROVED PERMIT FOR PICK-UP BY ONE OF ABOVE PLEASE '11AIL APP PER IT TO 1 2 3 4 ABOVE (Circl one) 7) SICK' tRE: DATE : c aR !! i1:al? # Mt i !! at ?:f? 71f? M an r" Mas:M.M 1i iFM i ?ri7s' iar ?1 NOON mwjw: rtl lm-. M Mao at ! mms aL ae FOR CITY USE ONLY PERMIT ISSUED 1 7 FEES: $ SEWER PERMIT (INCL;DE SURCHARGE) $ / p WATER PERMIT (INCLUDE SURCHARGE) WATER METER/COPPERHORN/OUTSIDE READER $ WATER TAP (INCLUDE CORPORATION STOP) $ SEWER TAP $ ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - SEWER $ ---? ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - WATER $ O_ A-=> WAC $ SAC $ TRUNK WATER ASSESSMENT $ TRUNK SEWER ASSESSMENT $ LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK SEWER $ LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK WATER $ OTHER $ TOTAL $ mod AMOUNT PAID/RECEIPT # DOES UTILITY CONNECTION REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY? YES IF YES, THEN A"'PERMIT FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC ROADWAY" MUST BE ISSUED BY THE NO ENGINEERING DIVISION. LIST AS A CONDI- TION. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: APPROVED BY: TITLE: Z ' DATE:._ 04 sin a*0a - s iw w r.E- as?w fair r rt MPG WkaNWM - NO RP" s!q 0t4W ft • !w sew IML-M Maya" • Jw w M r' i uk PARCEL FILE (ELIs?" ity of ccigan r? t p 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 June 12, 1986 MR AND MRS STEVE REED 4150 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE, EAGAN, MN 55123 Re: Storm Water Drainage Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reed: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Hopefully our meeting that was held Thursday, June 5 was beneficial and the storm water problem will be resolved in the near future so all three (3) property owners can complete their landscaping. It is unfortunate that the builder of Lot 16 did not use the elevation as recommended by Sienna Corporation at the time the home was constructed. The elevations for Lots 14 and 15 were determined by the building that occurred on Lot 16. With three (3) builders involved with Lots 14, 15 and 16 it can be a problem, given the circumstances, to resolve the drainage issue that has been created. Hopefully the wet well that was proposed as an alternative by the engineering firm of Jim Hill and Associates, representing Sienna Corporation, will provide proper resolution to the water ponding that has occurred since the three lots were developed. As I discussed at our meeting last Thursday, the City does not typically involve itself with matters that are considered private property and normally can only be resolved between a property owner and his or her builder. However, because this drainage issue directly affects three (3) properties and could indirectly impact two (2) adjacent properties, Lots 12 and 13, it seemed appropriate that the City attempt to facilitate some solution to the drainage problem. Please feel free to contact this office or our engineering division if you have any questions regarding the proposed construction of a wet well by the builders and three (3) property owners. Sincerely, C\\ko moe?k4r44- Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Jack Moffat Dale Gustafson THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY city OF eegan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH May 28, 1986 VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members -ES MR ED DANNECKER CO ity ? inEso r 4154 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE EUGENE VAN ONVERBEKE EAGAN MN 55123 ^ /c0 ciV sack {,1 r? Re: Lots 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block 7, Hilltop Estates Backyard Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Dannecker: I am in receipt of your letter of May 13 wherein you identified problems associated with draining the rear yard areas of the above-referenced lots. In researching our files, I have found that this problem has previously been identified prior to construction of the houses on Lots 14 and 15 with a recommended solution being prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., on September 22, 1983, which is enclosed for your information. On April 28 of this year, our Chief Building Official, Mr. Dale Peterson, responded to similar concern raised by Mr. Steve Reed, of 4150 Blueberry Circle (Lot 1'). A copy of that letter is also enclosed for your information.14 The existing low area along these common lot lines was not a major drainage concern in consideration of developing the overall subdivision, Hilltop Estates. Several similar type drainage situations are usually resolved through proper site planning and yard landscaping by the individual builders of each lot. Unfortunately, when Lot 16 was developed, the walkout elevation of that house was placed too low to allow adequate fill to be placed in the downstream lots (14 and 15) to ensure minimum surface flow out to Blueberry Circle. After inspecting the site during the early morning hours of May 21, I do not feel you will have a severe problem. However, the only way to be totally sure would be the installation of a gravity storm sewer system as referenced in your letter. However, with no other storm sewer facilities in the immediate vicinity, this type of installation would involve considerable expense ($10,000 +). The financing of similar type public improvements is usually achieved through special assessments against benefitted properties. In this case, they would be the five lots referenced above. In order for the Council to consider the expenditure of dollars and the subsequent assessment to private property or expenditure of public funds to finance this project, it would require the petition of at THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR ED DANNECKER MAY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 least two of the five property owners to initiate a feasibility report. Upon completion of this report, a formal public hearing would be held at which time the Council would hope that more than 51% of the affected property owners would support such a project. In order to initiate this process, I have enclosed a copy of the City's standard petition form which must be submitted to the Council before any formal study can be initiated beyond what has been performed to date by the developer's engineer. Until there has been sufficient support for this public improvement, the resolution of this problem remains one to be resolved between the affected property owners, their builders and/or developer. Sincerely, v as A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Dale Peterson, Chief Building Official Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation Jim Hill, James R. Hill, Inc. Enclosure Y1 ?.Qr /3tg 7 "'o e_2 10 * 9 Mr. Thomas Colbert 5-13-86 Eagan City Offices 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55123 Dear Mr. Colbert, I currently have excess ponding of rainwater at the rear of my lot. The water is runoff from.a number of adjacent lots which has resulted in significant accumulation. The size of the pond is approximately 70 by 20 by 3 feet deep. I have a .number of concerns about the ponding. 1)Foremost is safety. There are many children in the neighborhood. The pond poses a high potential of an accidental drowning. On one occurance earlier this year, a 7 year old boy became stuck in the pond because of the suction of the mud and required assistance to get out. 2)Towards the end of April,a second pond developed posing a threat to my home and my neighbors. The water levels are such that water could enter through the basement level windows. 3)A storm pipe was installed to drain water from the ponding area to the street. The elevation of the pipe is such that it is ineffective. I am conviced that my back yard will be submersed before the pipe would be utilized. There needs to be an arrangement to allow for proper drainage. I understand there are two alternate grading plans on file, neither of which have been implemented at this time. I do not have confidence that either of the plans will provide a total,long lasting solution. I request the city of Eagan conduct a feasibility study on the placement of a storm sewer in the area of the ponding to resolve the problem. There are a number of factors that limit the number of alternatives. The storm sewer will provide the best results. A prompt response from the city may be necessary to prevent damage from flooding. Sincerely, CC: Dan Osborn Steve Reed Ed Dannecker 4154 Blueberry Circle Phone W-921-1851 H-452-9757 of eagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 April 28, 1986 MR STEVE REED 4150 BLUEBERRY CIR EAGAN, MN 55123 RE: DRAINAGE OF L 14, 15 & 16, B 7, HILLTOP ESTATES. Dear Mr. Reed: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Councd Members THOMAS HEDGES City Aominahotor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk In response to your phone call of April 18, wherein you indicated at that time you did not want water standing on your property nor did you want any trees removed for filling, I am enclosing a copy of the transmittal from the Engineer, Mr. James Hill, to the developers of Hilltop Estates, Sienna Corporation, with proposed solutions to the drainage problem of the above lots. The proposed solutions to the drainage concerns were discussed with you at the time construction was started on your home in September of 1984. At that time, Sunshine Construction and you agreed to fill the rear yards and in place of the drainage swale use a buried drainage pipe which was done. If presently you do not want the rear yard filled and the trees removed, you have two alternatives left - the proposed wet well or ponding in your rear yard. Sincerely, Dale S. Peterson Chief Building Official DSP/is CC: Craig Knudsen - City Engineering Technician Sienna Corporation Sunshine Construction THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY i t R. July 21, 1986 Hill, inc. PLANNERS! ENGINEERS! SURVEYORS RECEIVED Jul 2 C I S80 Mr. Rodney D. Hardy Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive Suite 608 Minneapolis, MN 55435 RE: HILLTOP ESTATES LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCK 7 - DRAINAGE CONCERNS Dear Mr. Hardy; At your request, we have reviewed the recent soils report by GME and our field notes taken in June of 1986. Based on this information, we feel there are'four alternatives to reduce the drainage problem within the rear of lots 14, 15 and 16. 1.) Fill the low lying area to a suitable elevation such that the runoff flows to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the existing vegetation. This alternative was pre- viously proposed in our letter of October 6, 1983 to Dale Peterson, City Building Inspector. 2.) Fill the low lying area within lot 15 only to a suitable elevation such that the runoff flows into the 12" P.V.C. installed by the builder. The fill required would range between 0.5' to 1.5' deep. This would require a minimal amount of disruption to the existing vegetation. Also, a wet well would be required at the outlet of the pipe in the front yard of lot 14. Per the soils report, a wet well can be constructed in the area of the outlet. As a backup to the wet well, a provision should be included to discharge additional water to Blueberry Circle. See attached for schedule of estimated construction costs. 3.) Construct a catch basin and sump pump system near the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. The surface water would drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would be activated to pump the water via the existing drain pipe. A wet well as described in alternative #2, would also be required in the front yard of lot 14. See attached 8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH • BLOOMINGTON • MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-884-3029 I f schedule for estimated construction costs. The issues to be resolved with this solution are as follows. 1) ownership and maintenance costs of pump? 2) variation of weather conditions - the pump must be removed during the winter season. (pump wt. = 110 lbs) 3) the pump must be wired to a house - who pays electrical costs? or how shared? 4) what happens if electricity goes out? 4.) Install a catch basin in the low lying area and run the storm sewer line into the existing city storm sewer system under a public improvement project. See attached plan and schedule of costs. Given the four alternatives, we would recommend alter- native number 4 as the best solution to the drainage concern. However because of the high cost to each of the three benefitting lots, we feel that alternative number 2 would be the next best. Within all of the alternatives, ponding may still occur depending on the duration and intensity of a storm. This is because the drain pipe or sewer system can only handle so much water at a given time. Also, there is only approximately 1.5'+ from the low lying area to the walkout elevation of lot 16 before flooding would occur. If you have any questions or require further information with regard to this matter, please advise. Sincerely, JAMES R. HILL, INC. 6;Peter A. Bishop, .E. Vice President cc: Tom Colbert - City of Eagan Dale Peterson - City of Eagan Attachments ?.....,_ .... D LJ; I I ¦.-„?. JQI 11CJ I\• I 1111/ 11 1t,. HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 2 Estimated Construction Costs Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum 600.00 (off site disposal) Barrow material 80 cu.yd. @ 5.00/cu.yd. 400.00 to fill hole Restoration - Sodding 220 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 440.00 Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00 on Lot 14 $2,640.00 + 10% Contingencies 260.00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $2,900.00 ¦... "Al ej J dl 1 I CJ N. I I I I I/ I I I L. 11 a'/it+MJ4.Y??i. ???. ? ,;'1,, k;' ? ? .-,b:i ¦i'f ? "` , '?i'L 4? s ? _ HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 3 Estimated Construction Costs Catch Basin Sump . Lump Sum $ 1,125.00 (with discharge pipe) Pump & High Level Lump Sum 3,610.00 Controls (See attached details) Electrical Wiring Lump Sum 425.00 Restoration - Sodding 150 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 300.00 Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00 on Lot 14 $ 6,660.00 + 10% Contingencies 660.00 Total Estimated $ 7,720.00 Construction Costs ._,. ...... n "Al Jai I IC' N. 1 1111, 11 It, HILLTOP ESTATES' B`uE KN Wl z a J 13 12 14 PROPOSED C.B. SEE DETAIL 15 F o ARY Ci N 16 NO SCALE 17 EHIVE CASTING 11 ,ELECTRICAL CONNECTION SCHARGE LINE TO EXISTING 12" DRAIN PIPE SUMP PUMP PROPOSED CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE NO. 3. HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 4 The third alternative'as mentioned in the GME Consultants, Inc. report dated June 27, 1986 is to petition the City of Eagan for a storm sewer system to terminate with a catch basin being installed in the rear yard area between Lot 14 and 15. The nearest storm sewer exists at the intersection of Diffley Road and Blueberry Lane which would require approximately 640 L.F. of pipe and 3 structures together with street, boulevard, and driveway restoration. (See Attached) The estimated total cost for this storm sewer system is approximately $28,168.00 based on the following estimated quantities. 12" R.C.P. CL5 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD MANHOLE 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD CATCH BASIN RESTORATION OF BOULEVARDS STREET RESTORATION DRIVEWAY RESTORATION 640 L.F. @ 23.00/L.F. 2 EA. @ 800.00 EA. 1 EA. @ 850.00 EA. 525 S.Y. @ 2.00/S.Y. LUMP SUM 3 EA. @ 300.00 EA. + 10% Contingencies + 30% City Engineering & Administrative Costs Total Estimated Costs $14,720.00 1,600.00 850.00] 1,050.00 1,000.00 900.00 $20,120.00 2,012.00 6,036.00 $28,168.00 Cost Per Lot $ 9,389.00 (assuming 3 benefitting lots) Cost Per Lot $ 5,633.00 (assuming 5 benefitting lots) n "Al )dl I ICS N. I I I I I/ II Il,,. (N I -co 001, NS 69 E• $ qg 3s., v. p "? . oN ca 1 /.4 0 g0.49 9 ,o ERRY o N 147 05152 E~ ? o og622 0 .?mN 49.71 'T =0 10 bL T '6°2929 24 69.16 O Q O_ o. 93 SS 0 Ovt, d ,1'h. •ti .?ro19 O ° fi a v20?o 053 z e3 `° 124? Zp' E ?N ?1' 60,10° ?a O o -gyp=3 7 r N•T•L°38 oo9 y9 34 N h o0 - c •_--111.8 ft d'6 o2gOg,. c p? to- C%j g pg?'VE .16 f?06 p N. 22 NO at 6og717 __N?9oa?'52'E 00 Oa, o (D O o Nod j? 5 .` w o , o a? X9263 ` YOKNOLL Po _\ (D JM O\ v SS>O --124.018 ati, 111.87 m S89022'53"E- - - 3 98.38 's7 17 °' 00 ON to I- io to A=93°57'20" %P < N In - 0- o 0 e 7i 0 N 21 N ¢ a a) to oD M 12 t9? o m ^? N ' SS> a z N °d` CD `X90 /s R4 N &0 I'D -- -• I30.00 _ _ 1! 034 '? ? S3 sF a ^ °41'07 L 205.75 S 87°37'37"E _ _S83 \, 4,F 00 ^m . m o N .. -115.75 - ) - 90.00 S? °p9, ?P >?, ro o (o ?moo, 39'' ..? s3 3mN 14 0 0 L41 8qs %s° dS 2 19 6 -/0 0 v O pOM? r>< 1 O° 4 0O y - 0 ?• o o 01' O Al 0 00 ?p 0 0 o 20 (o 16 M e°Oph S4??SC ep0D \ dom. Nod` ? ?yao Oss = zS.OO (o° °552s?. .?O 9/S4 ?n) N a.?:.64;72 3° ??? 2s F` , h e . o q<<! >3 9'9'• p0 3''? 6 \6a \ 0° A> ?9 o S°°0- 9?eF X02 60 o p?P26 .? ? C1 ° S O / 3 ?n ./ O Ftp A . 28 0 4j _'h M 0, q; y `? O z o Qom. ?O 39'• ?f- - _-' I ?5 ( z. 000 ?'h 31919 2 O 2°00 03 ?. Ss9 o 3>? . `F . 1. N5 3 21 Ss „?Q O, I /oes a° try S62 o J';?V 17 co 8 /g ,?. .4. ,1 c 52.94 ti 30 ? a`? 1 1 3,99°as• a=50°3320" ?> Sto d' ?? 1 00 c S O? ? s °01 2 Z h / a ?°' N?O Il, °o S, °' 70 o NO Po 22 0h" ° gN ID 0 0 toc .4:) k) co V A, w 0 7 p S89°30'20" E- 6•,0 3 3_ r`S Q 3 . `t N °j am- 0 5'31"W 118.91 20 op ti6 m N N 33. 4 j 8 ' R : Z W _'O N 0? oA lo M N0o r 20., 1 3 3 - - m io i O o i M N tp lo: out N p O W- m R ti LL a) rn 0? U) In M o `° Q a N: - W o a1 n U) ° 23 W 0 10 V, 19 z coo Z a v `e. ?I --?_ -? 0 `- - 130 0 ' 30 179.63 - - 199.28 101.12- - - -- -- - W W EXi51)N13 SINS N A,v.m S-ra-A w% ?, w£R O I NO. 30 _ . so9 Ts 0. P:?,^ ?.:1. 3C 60_ M • r, rr i: ?..J. x!1:11 C 1 is A SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS ?-t ti 1.L`G-o E TA I E5 V Ro PosD STo ?)v` s F w E F T.-.. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2083 East Center Circle / Minneapolis, MN 55441 / 612/559-1859 June 27, 1986 Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive, Suite 608 Edina, Minnesota 55435 Attention: Mr. Rod Hardy GME Project No. 1073 RE: Subsurface exploration for proposed back yard drainage area at Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 7 of Hilltop Estates in Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen: As authorized by you on June 11, 1986, we have completed this subsurface exploration for the proposed back yard drainage area. Enclosed please find the results of our exploration and the soil report which we have prepared. Two copies of this report have been sent to the above address. Two copies have been sent to Mr. Harold Bohanon of James R. Hill, Inc. INTRODUCTION Single family dwellings have recently been constructed at the three subject lots in the Hilltop Estates Subdivision. Groundwater has been observed ponded on the surface in the rear yards these lots during recent rainy periods. It is also our understanding that prior to the development of the subdivision, this area was a naturally-occurring drainage swale and ponding area. In an attempt to eliminate the water from ponding on the surface, a storm drain about 12 inches in diameter was installed from the rear yard area near the property line dividing Lots 14 GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS WILLIAM C. KWASNY, P.E. THOMAS P. VENEMA, P.E. WILLIAM E. BLOEMENOAL, E.I.T. Mr. Rod Hardy 2 June 27, 1986 and 15. This drain daylights in the front yard area of Lot' 14. Due to the existing topography, this drain was not capable of dewatering- the area. It is now proposed to undertake remedial measures which would reduce or eliminate water ponding on the surface. i i i The purpose of this report is to describe the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration; to review and evaluate these conditions with respect to the proposed project; and to present recommendations for feasible methods of reducing the possibility of water ponding on the surfaces of the rear yards. FIELD EXPLORATION/LABORATORY TESTING Two borings were drilled for this project as shown on the enclosed Soil Boring Location Diagram. The number and locations of the borings were chosen by GME Consultants, Inc. and James R. Hill, Inc. during a site meeting on June 9, 1986. The borings were laid out in the field by the GME drill crew. Ground surface elevations at the borings were determined by GME, referenced to the elevation of the invert of the existing drain. The elevations of the borings are shown at the top of the respective logs (NVGD Datum). The borings were drilled with a Mobile B-24 rig. Solid stem augers were used to advance the borings full depth. The soil samples were obtained by the split barrel in accordance with ASTM: D 1586. During sampling, the Standard Penetration Values GME CONC111TANTS. INC Mr. Rod Hardy 3 June 27, 1986 (N-values, blows per foot) were recorded. These N-values are shown on the respective boring logs. The recovered soil samples were preliminarily classified in the field, sealed in glass jars to prevent moisture loss, and returned to our laboratory for examination and classification by a Soil Engineer. Groundwater levels were noted in the borings during and after completion of the field operations. These water levels are shown on the respective logs. A discussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings is included under the Site Conditions section of this report. The laboratory testing program consisted of a Soil Engineer examining each sample to determine the major and minor soil components, while also noting the color, degree of saturation, and any lenses or seams found in the samples. The soils were visually/manually classified on the basis of texture and plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The letter symbol in parentheses following the written description on the logs is the estimated group symbol based on the USCS. A chart describing the properties of the groups under this system is included in the Appendix of this report. The Engineer grouped the soils by type into the strata shown on the logs. The stratification lines shown on the logs are approximate; insitu, the transition between soil types may be gradual or abrupt in both the horizontal and vertical directions. GMF CnNaIJITeNTS INC_ Mr. Rod Hardy 4 June 27, 1986 Particle size analysis of soils repre! granular soil strata observed in each determined in the laboratory in accordance part of the testing program, laboratory determined in accordance with ASTM: D moisture content results are shown on the and on the sieve analysis sheets. tentative of the • most of the borings were with ASTM: D 422. As a moisture contents were 2216. The laboratory appropriate boring logs Groundwater levels were noted in t1e borings during and after completion of the drilling operations. The recorded water levels are shown in the lower left corner of the respective boring logs. A discussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings in included under the Site Conditions section of this report. We will retain the soil samples remaining after testing for 30 days after the date of this report. If you wish to have the samples retained beyond this time, we ask that you please advise us; otherwise, the samples will be discarded. SITE CONDITIONS Topography/Surface Features The ponding area generally runs in a southwest to northeast direction from the center of Lot 16 to the rear of Lot 14. The topography of this area varies from a high elevation of approximately 893 feet to 894 feet adjacent to the rear of the houses, to a low of approximately 889 feet near the property line dividing Lots 14 and 15. This area is covered with dense GMF I!rHu III TANTR INC Mr. Rod Hardy 5 June 27, 1986 vegetation varying from brush to large mature trees. Boring 1 was drilled in the lowlying rear yard area. The inlet of an approximately 12 inch diameter drain pipe is located in the rear yard area. The drain runs in a generally Sav westerly direction towards Blueberry Circle and then in a t?.rfs tee° direction to the front yard area of Lot 14 near the intersection of Blueberry Circle and Blueberry Lane. Boring 2 was drilled near the outfall of the drain. The vegetation in this immediate area is sparse and includes-low grasses. Soil Conditions The soil conditions found in the borings are shown on the respective logs. The soil conditions vary at the two boring locations. At boring 1, the surface is covered with approximately 2.5 of dark brown silty fine to medium sand and clayey sand fill. The fill contains trace roots and seams of black fine sandy silt. Underlying the fill and extending to the termination depth of the boring at 20 feet, occur highly stratified soils. These stratified soils include clayey silt, sandy silt, clayey sands, silty sand, and sandy clay." The observed seams-or lenses vary in thickness from less than 0-.5 feet to nearly 7 feet in thickness. The N-values within the naturally-occurring non-organic soils at boring 1 varied from 2 to 43 blows per foot, generally increasing with depth. The N-values indicate that these soils increased from soft GME CONSULTANTS. INC. I Mr. Rod Hardy 6 June 27, 1986 or loose at shallow depths to dense or hard at greater depth. Based on visual observations in the laboratory, particle size analysis testing were run on the two predominant granular soil types for use in estimation of the permeability of these soils. The percent passing the #200 sieve, which is the division between coarse and fine grained- soils, vary from approximately 29% to 34%. The moisture content of these `same samples varied from approximately 15% to 17%. At boring 2, the soils were slightly less stratified. At that location, the upper most approximately 7 feet consisted of black and dark brown stratified silty fine to coarse sand and sandy silt with trace organic content. This upper most 7 feet is probably fill. Below a depth of 7 feet, the predominant soil type was fine to coarse sand and silty sand with layers of sandy silt. The Standard Penetration Test Resistancies within the naturally occurring sandy soils varied from 6 to 24 blows per foot indicative of a loose to medium dense condition. Based on laboratory particle size analysis tests, the silt and clay content of the sandy soils at this site varied from approximately 6% to 18%. Thus, the` granular soils at boring 2 contain less fines (particles smaller than the #200 sieve) than those soils encountered at boring 1. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 7 June 27, 1986 Groundwater Conditions Free groundwater was encountered in each of the two borings during our relatively brief period of observation. At boring 1, the groundwater was observed at a depth of 2 feet while drilling. At the conclusion of drilling, the water was at 3 feet from the: surface. At boring 2, located in the front yard area, minor seepage was observed at a depth of 9 feet while drilling. The borehole was dry upon completion of the drilling and approximately 2 hours later. Laboratory soil moisture content tests results varied from approximately 15% to 17% at boring 1, and from approximately 3% to 9% at boring 2. Based on the available data, it can be seen that the groundwater is at shallower depths and the soils in a wetter condition at boring 1 than at boring 2. The groundwater levels will vary seasonally and annually, depending upon local amounts of precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff, infiltration, and for other reasons. Excavations extending just a few feet below the existing ground surface in the rear yard area would likely encounter groundwater infiltration. The quantity of such infiltration would likely be substantial. Excavation near the out fall of the existing drain pipe would encounter less groundwater. CMC en-.1 TfITC INr Mr. Rod Hardy 8 June 27, 1986 REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS We understand that the site becomes ponded with water during times of heavy rainfall. A preliminary proposal was presented by others, to reduce or eliminate the ponding of surface water in this area was to install a "wet well." Briefly described, a wet well includes an excavation at the site, to be backfilled with highly permeable granular soils. The surface water would infiltrate the granular soils and would then be dispersed into the natural soils. Thus, the surface waters would be allowed to discharge into the soils at depth. The soil and groundwater conditions at this site do not appear to be suitable for construction of a wet well. `-Suitable naturally- occurring conditions would include highly permeable granular soils and a groundwater level at substantial depth. The soils at boring 1 in the rear yards are stratified and include highly impermeable layers of silt, clay, and silty and clayey sands. Laboratory sieve analysis test results for the granular soils indicate the inclusion of approximately 30% or more silt and clay. We estimate that the permeability of the granular soils at that location to be approximately 1 x 10 -6 cm/sec or less. For a design of a wet well, it is also beneficial to have a groundwater table which is-relatively deep. At this site, the groundwater was encountered at a very shallow depth on the order of 2 feet. Such a high existing groundwater table would cause a mounding condition with the introduction of water from a wet well. GME CENS111TANTS_ INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 9 June 27, 1986 That is, as new water were introduced through the wet well, rather than being quickly dispersed laterally into the existing soils, a rise in the groundwater (mounding) would occur which would take extended periods of time to disperse. This wuld effectively reduce or eliminate infiltration. The soil conditions at the outfall of the existing drain in the front yard of Lot 14, are somewhat better suited for construction of a wet well. The granular soils at that location contain less silt and clay content, on the order of 18% at a depth of 6 to 12 feet and approximately 6% between the depths of 16 feet and 20 feet. The deeper sand stratum would be suitable for the design of a wet well. However, these soils are at substantial depth and wet well construction could be costly. Also, groundwater infiltration was encountered at a depth of 9 feet at this location.. This relatively shallow groundwater table would reduce the efficiency of the wet well. We recommend that the proposed wet well not be built in the rear yard area. It is our opinion that three alternatives exist to the proposed wet well. The alternatives may not be as satisfactory from an asthetic and economic perspective that the. originally proposed wet well Alternate No. 1 would be to fill the lowlying area to a suitable elevation such that runoff occurs by flow to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the vegetation that currently occupies the rear yard. It would be possible to GMF f]nMCI11 TMNTS INC Mr. Rod Hardy 10 June 27, 1986 replant this area after the earthwork is completed. As a part of filling the rear yard area to promote surface drainage, it would be advantageous to partially grade the site to drain to the existing buried drain pipe at which point it would flow to the front yard of Lot 14 where a wet well could be constructed. A properly designed and constructed wet well in this area could be feasible. If filling and replanting the rear yard area are not possible, as a second alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard so that the surface water drains to a location near the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. At that location, a catch basin and sump pump would be installed. The surface water would drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would be activated and pump the water via the existing drain pipe to a wet well constructed at the out fall of the drain. As a backup to the wet well in the front yard, an overflow mechanism should be included to discharge additional water to the Blueberry Circle storm sewer system. As a third, possibly more expensive alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard to drain to a catch basin in the rear yard as discussed in Alternate No. 2. For this alternative, rather than a sump pump removing the water, the water could be drained by gravity to a suitable discharge location. However, due to the existing topography of the area, the most suitable discharge location would likely be at some distance away, probably GME CONSULTANTS. INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 11 June 27, 1986 at Diffley Road, or to an existing storm sewer system also at some distance away. This drain system would have to cross at least 2 existing streets. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS i i J 7 J l J J J This preliminary report has been prepared based on the soil and groundwater conditions-found in our subsurface exploration, and on the preliminary data related to us by James R. Hill, Inc. This report is intended solely for this project at the specific location discussed. The soil and groundwater conditions were determined at 2 boring locations. These conditions are pertinent only at the boring locations and under the environment existing at the time of our subsurface exploration. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions were encountered and additional variations probably_ exist that would not become apparent until construction starts. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is presented in this report with respect to the soil and groundwater conditions on this site. It is not warranted to extrapolate soil conditions between the boring locations themselves. We would be pleased to sipply additional geotechnical recommendations at which time a specific design is considered. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to GME CONSULTANTS. INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 12 contact us. Sincerely, GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Will' m D. Plate, P.E. Pro t Eng. eer /Illiam C. Kw cipal Engi APPENDIX: Soil Boring Location Diagram General Notes Soil Boring Logs Sieve Analysis Results Unified Soil Classification Chart WDP:WCK:kdk June 27, 1986 I hereb certify that plan, specification, or re was preps by me or under my direc supervisio and that I am a duly Regi o e ional Engineer under the law a of Minnesota. Date C -Z 7 Reg GME CONSULTANTS. INC. ?wC 6ej?'y B-2 \Ca 890.7; 0- • N SOIL BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM LOTS 14, 15 & 16; BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES EAGAN, MINNESOTA STFNNA CORPORATION D N O APPROXIMATE SCALE 0' 25' 50' GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 P WCK 1073 6-20-86 S *64 +w ' 7 • D?J ?. i i i J J J GENERAL NOTES DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SL . SS with Liner SS Split Spoon'- 13/8" 1.0.. 2" O.D.; unless OS : Osterberg Sampler - 3" Shelby Tube otherwise noted HS Hollow Stem Auger ST : Shelby Tube - 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted WS : Wash Sample PA : Power Auger FT ; Fish Trail DB : Diamond Bit - NX: BX: AX RB : Rock Bit AS : Auger Sample BS . Bulk Sample JS . Jar Sample PM : Pressuremeter test - in situ VS : Vane Shear Standard "N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon, except where noted. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL : Water Levei WCI : Wet Cave In DCI : Dry Cave In WS While Sampling WD : While Drilling BCR : Before Casing Removal ACR: After Casing Removal AB : After Boring Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence of ground water elevations must be sought. GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY: 11 Coarse Grained or Granular Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are described as: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and silts if they are non-cohesive. In addition to gradation, granular soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place density and fine grained soils on the basis of their strength or consistency, and their plasticity. Major Descriptive Term(s) Component (Of Components Also Percent of Of Sample Size Range Present in Sample) Dry Weight Boulders Over 8 in. (200mm) Trace 1 - 9 Cobbles 8 in, to 3 in. Little 10 - 19 (200mm to 75mm) Gravel ' 3 in. to #4 sieve Some 20 - 34 (75mm to 2mm) Sand #4 to #200 sieve And 35 - 50 (2mm to .074mm) Silt Passing #200 sieve (0.074mm to 0.005mm) Clay Smaller than 0.005mm CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS: RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOILS: Unconfined Comp. Strength, Qu, tsf Consistency N - Blows/ft.. Relative Density < 0.25 Very Soft 0-3 Very Loose 0.25-0.49 Soft 4-9 Loose 0.50-0.99 Medium (Firm) 10 - 29 Medium Dense 1.00-1.99 Stiff 30 - 49 Dense 2.00-3.99 Very Stiff 50 - 80 Very Dense 4.00-8.00 Hard 80+ Extremely Dense >8.00 Very Hard -Mt' rnr7CrTT49A rr.4 _ Tt3[ LOG OF BORING 1 ' PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 SITE Blueberry Lane Hilltop Estates Eagan, Minnesota OWNER ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Sienni or orations James R. Hill, Inc. I- UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT 2 W I- - 0 - L L U. 1 2 3 4 5 W O DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL 1:0 _j z WATER w j > = w m CONTENT % LL Zwa w 0 _jV) w -?- a w i- 2 STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT) Q cc W U) > SURFACE ELEVATION 890.2 feet UCL U1 ) Z 10 20 30 40 50 wo U) ZQ 3 Dark brown silty tine to medium 1SS sand, and clayey sand, trace roots, 2 0 -SZ2.51 gravel; trace seams black fine 2SS 4' sandy silt - very loose - wet - 2 ,pame Brown clayey silt, trace fine sand - 8 ® • pl3SS 6' f - wet - M #_ I Red-brown clayey fine to coarse sand 7 5' trace gravel - loose - wet - SC 6 E 4SS . Gray very fine sandy silt, trace I 5SS Red-brown clayey fine to medium sand 14 to sandy clay - loose - wet - SC-CL 6SS Gray-brown and red-brown stratified 28 clayey fine to medium sand and silty 14' sand, trace gravel; seams sandy m dense - wet- to m di - lo s l ay e u c o e SC-SM• seams CL 7SS 16' Brown and yellow-brown silty fine 23 to medium sand to sandy silt, trace 8SS clay, gravel - dense - moist - 34 SM-ML 9SS Dark gray fine to coarse sandy clay and sandy silt, trace gravel - 43 very stiff to hard - wet - (CL-ML) End of Boring at 20 feet Solid Stem Auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttings WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Y 2 feet While Drilli I 3 faet After Drilli 0 0 GME CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING COMPLETED 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN WDP JOB# 1073 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types: insitu the transition may be gradual. LOG OF BORING 2 PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 Hilltop Estates SITE Blueberry Lane Eagan. Minnesota OWNER Sienna Corporations ARCHITECT-ENGINEER James R. Hill, Inc. c H LL 'L C UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT 2 -O_ 1 2 3 4 5 w III LL ca W j z wa -1 > -' Z I v DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL w ? fn j 30 m w _j WATER CONTENT % -?- OWS/FOOT CL ° a < z U) a w < 3 ¢ SURFACE ELEVATION -"v 890.7 feet _ a w Cl) > Z ) STANDARD PENETRATION (BL -® 10 20 30 40 50 Yellow-brown silty fine to coarse iSS sand trace gravel - loose - moist- 5 , SM - fill 2SS Black and dark brown stratified 11 f silty ine to coarse sand and sandy 3SS silt, trace clay, gravel, wood, 4 roots, slightly organic - soft to 7' stiff - (SM-ML-OL) - probable fill 9 4SS Yellow - brown fine to coarse sand , trace silt, gravel, clay - loose 5SS di d ' 6 04 to me um ense - moist to wet - (SP - SM) 6SS , 13 12 fi di d il um san y s Brown ne to me t, trace gravel very stiff - moist - 15' 7SS ML 21. ' Red-brown silt fi rs t 16 y ne o coa e sand, trace gravel - medium dense - , 8SS moist - (SW-SP) 16 Red-brown fine to coarse sand , trace silt, gravel - medium dense- -2-04- - (SW-SP) 24 End of Boring at 20 feet Hollow Stem Auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttin s g WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED -1.3-86 w L Q Seepage at 9 feet INC. GME CONSULTANTS BORING COMPLETED 6-13-86 . . W L While Drilling , 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 DRILLER RDK . . w L Dry After Drilling MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN WDP APPROVED WCK . JOB# 1073 SHEET 2 of 2 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual. 148iaM Aq Jasieo3 jua3Jad E I E • N Vl N v v N 0 < 0 t0 ^O ND O? 8,. .,g 0 In c 0 O O O O O o In O 0 10- - O ?. o o 0 0 0 0 0 08 01 ? t? Ip 1(f f 1?1 N 148!aM Aq Jour lua»ad SIEVE ANALYSIS LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES BLUEBERRY LANE =FrnTA v 0 J r n N y C E U- c N c z `. ¢ a C Z 79 d u_ N QN U 3 0 U 3 c 9 V V D_ ' Cl In r' GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE It MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 KMH WCK 6-18-86 1073 14HiaM ?(q jasjeo? lua?tad E x x N N c 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 a 0 Ci T 01 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O^ O A m n 10 In • rf N j4HiaM Aq jaui j jua3Jad SIEVE ANALYSIS LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES BLUEBERRY LANE EAGAN, MINNESOTA U 0 J in N d C E U- c_ m N E- z .. Q c w a U -a 73 LL L o) N Cr (n d Q C J U a 0 c 3 M a go U GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 KMH WCK 6-18-86 1073 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM: D 2487) Major divisions sGymbo s Typical names Laboratory classification cation criteria ° GW Well-graded gravels, gravel and D60 (D3o1 1 r than 4; C ' o 6o between 1 and 3 great" ° D IXD . -. mixtures, little or no fines _ D10 " ° v « GP Poorly graded gravels• gravel- $ . Not meeting all gradation requirements fOr GW v sand mixtures, little or no fines 0 0 c d p 41 V1 " '* °> e c t r g c E GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt « i7 y y g Atterberg limits below A 4 h c: Z mixtures 52 K 0 r an line or P.I. less t Above "A" line with P.I. g g, 4 o u i b }? z 3 c E between 4 and 7 are bor use i in , ° 2 ° „ e ° GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay iii C L Atterberg limits above "A" g r drrline uses requ of dual symbols 9 L mixtures c line with P.I. greater than 7 E Well -graded sands, gravelly fi 1 D60 ID30 between I and 3 XD greater than 6; Cc D Cu- _ nes sands, little or no 60 1 0 D to h ° C c V t: SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines M c .. ; • Io Not meeting all gradation requirement- for SW e •S « c coZ d >d •' " Z" 2 a SM Silty sands, send-slit mixtures -& c 2 E g g N $ A Atterberg limits below line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting In hatched g ° L` g u °! p zone with P.I. between 4 R .; $ g g ' N r« and 7 are borderline uses 1 ° sends, sand-day mix- Clayey E c o J 2 Atterberg limits above "A" requiring use of dual sym- bols. Sc lures 2 _ 'n line with P.I. greater than 7 002 Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, Silty or day- ML ey fine sands or clayey silts 60 c with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to me- CL dium plasticity, gravelly days, sandy days. silty clays, lean g z _ clays N U) l z o Cr Organic silts and organic silty ? OL clays of low plasticity x 31 l Inorganic silts, micaceous or MH diatomaceous fine sandy or 10 - L silty soils, elastic silts iC 4 2 LL inorganic clays of high plas- o ?' .. CH ticity, fat clays 1 r r E e N 9 _• Organic clays of medium to Y OH high plasticity, organic silts _J Peat and other highly organic =o soils For classification of fineyramed soils and fine fraction of coarse- rained soils . g i n Atterberg Limits plotting hatched area are borderline deesi- fications requiring use of dual mbols s . y Equation of A-line: PI=0.73 (LL - 20) OH a rMH ••P CL M L O dOL ....... . La n 0 10 20 it) 4u °v w ' V ••• -- Liquid Limit Plasticity Chart 100 P# CCIA6 VMS ON P CL IPI Qf COMPACTED PL& 8011, RC NEPAL The placement of compacted till for r support of foundt le.s, time slabs, pavements. or earth structures should be carded out b •n experleneed cute water with the proper equipment. The excavator Must be prepared to adapt his procedures, equipment, and materials to the type of project, to wither cnditions, and the structural requl i reeevt of the architect and engineer. Net hods and materials used !n eum-t way not be applicable n doter.tf11 used I. dry e ¦eavatlons may not be suitable in wet excavatins or during periods of precipitations proposed till soil may require wetting or drying for Proper placement and compaction. Condition May also vary during the course of usage pre ject or In life "t areas or the site. These needs should be and sped llutions. addressed in the project draw EXCAVATION/SACRFILL BELOW TMf. MATER TASLE r sit. It 1s common to have to eecavte and replaee unsuitable soil. below the water table foend tha eecavation/backf illabelow the water table otebe Permitted,iounlesshthe excavation is dewateted. Numerous problems can develop when this procedure is attempted without dawatering. - Flat, .. ty *I the to observe thot all onsuitablersolls/materials havelbeen removed from the base of the excavation. - Inability to observe and measure that proper lateral Over aising is provided. Inability to prevent Of correct sloughing of excavation sidewslls, which can result I. ..suitable soils trapped within the select backfill. - Inability of the contractor to adequately and uniformly compact the backfill. - Possibility of disturbance of the suitable soils at the base of the excavation. often berdertered Withhasuep pits) and ppuapel eon•t rr uctionl pnettcod exce?tionshoin cosit, this technique would not be applicable for •:caul ion estendinq into permaable grants isr e.1 especially for depth, significantly below the rater table. pswstering granular soils should normally be done With well points or wells. When dewtering is needed, re strongly recommend that the procedures be discussed at pre-bid or pre-construction meetings. The dewaWtering technique Chosen by the contractor should be reviewed by the architect and •nglneer f sore construct Len atortes It should not be left until excavation to under way. the :election of proper backfill materials is Important when working in dewtered eseavtlone. Even with dewsterieq, the base la usually wet and the contractor must be careful not to diturb the base, we recommend that the firt 11!1 , of backfill be .511e an medium to coarse orate sand with less than St pesainq the 1200sieve. The use of sity :and, clayey sand, or cohesive/semi-cohesive soils is not recommended inc such situations. The excavator should be required to •ubalt e.Mples of the proposed materisitsl he plans to use as backfill before the fill is Muted to the site. so that It can be tested for suitability. VIWTLR EMTHWOAA CONSTRUCTION winter earthwort presents its we range of problems which must be oerconef the situation may be complicatedby the need for dewtering discussed above. During freezing conditions, the fill used ..at not be frozen when delivered to the t te. It also must not be allowed to freeze during or after compaction. Since the ability to work the s it while keeping it Iron freezlnq depends in part on the soil type. the spec ifieations should require the contractor to subm It a s:.ple of his proposed fill before construction starts, for laboratory testing. If the soil engineer and structural engineer determine that 1t I. not suitable. St should be rejected. In general. silty .and, clayey sand. and tohedre/meei- cohesive lolls should not be used as fill under freezing conditions. All frozen soil of any type :hold be rejected for use as compacted till. It is important that compacted fill be protected free freezing after it is placed. The e *al l plan should excavator should be required pla ltrar,prblanket ¦,thcot to loosehtill, topsoil, et cal detell$ on the type proposed for use as Frost protection. The need to protect the ..It fro (feet Ing is -go lnq throughout construction and pplies both before and aster concrete Is placed, until backfillinq for final (tout protecti..ii s completed. Poun aatione placed on frozen soil can experience heaving and significant •ettl ge.ent. rat ton, or other movement as the moil thaws. Such Mvemeat can M. occur 1f the soil !s tltwed to freeze after the concrete is placed and then pro ectl nl front freesing,silt, P-200 materldl I. the need percentage ;11 ed Ill. to higher the 110111 toosuttAfITS. toe MOISTURE C2!!RO 2! PILL applicable toro Trott. rangennw wet he op Inuw ruired to ntent)Las defined sturethcontent In general, fill should be placed within about 21 of options. The nead for Moisture tnntr,l I. More critical an the Percentage of floes incrssssa Matun llY-oeeurrleg clayey sand or be dlfflcul t?w or polaticinPCg an if .., to is Is t r eonpa case/such- soil.Veto lther•pecifiedudensity •syh . pavementd sto the ubgrsdeeeCdueedto ... sty. app iiedl load-all* mThisauto sepeclally air ueofwhenstab ot eohe•lve/semi-cohesive coil is used as backfill in utility trenches under streets. Eacesslvely wet soil in thick till sections may c maumse post-construction settlement beyond that estimated for fill placed at or near 11211 the opt tu Moisture content. An exceptin to this would be low permeability soll plated e. a pond liner Or for a do. Such soil should usually be placed at 2% to t1 above the optimum mol Kure eon tent, to provide for lover lnsltu pe reeabllf ty. ALSO, shrln1iabove liing soils iexpmnsive clay) should Co bplaced at about 21 to t shove optimum moisture to reduce the possibility of soil espa.sion. layey al lt. silt, or very silty fine sand should not be placed enceosively dry. Such soils Can undergo post-construction consolidation upon being wetted, even if the apacified density had been achieved. this I. caused by the collapse of a flocculant soil particle arrangement, and can result in settlement of building. or slabs constructed over the soil. Proper control Of fill sell moisture is the responsibility of the excavator. The excavator should evaluate the need for wetting or dry ing the soils, based either an the data in the s oil report, or his own site testing. If the eseavtor I. brining In ff-alto fill. It is also his responsi Dllity to •valuste the moisture content of the soilg, and thoe need for wetting or drying. We recawnend that this matter be addressed in the project specifications. CONSTRUCTION LW COMPACTED SOIL After the select fill has been placed, compacted, and tested, it must be maintained and protected In order to properly support structures. The suitability of compacted fill call an b sit nstruction all , footingtexcav tionseorl atl thessurface ofoslab/Placemenmsubgrade lsaturated or statue is bydco(such me in equipment. The responsibility for protecting the soil, or for correcting any disturbance, should be clearly dot Ined In the specifications. soils which became wet and soft after compaction testing do not needssarlly reflect inaccurate field density tests. Especially with non-•npansive cohesive/semi-cohesive soils, saturetlon When unconfined can severely reduce the shear ,trey ash white the density remains adequate. The reduced shear strength can cause foot logs, Tioor • bs. or pavenrnta to settle or fall under load. We strongly recommend that all pavement eubgrades be test lulled INN/DOT pecification 21111 immediately be fore paving to determine if the subgrade he. not been protected and soft spots have developed. FLOOR SLAB SUSGMDE AND UTILITY TRENCHES This facet of construction presents special problems, especially if the tab subgrade Is allowed to freeze. When the soil thaws, it undergoes a period of temporarily lower shear strength. floor slabs should not be cast over mil in such a wakened or frozen condition ireference pertinent PCA and ACI pblfutlon•l. To do so can result in cracked and is fling slabs. The time period to beat and thaw a building may place the eons ruction schedule and/or costs jeopardy We strongly recommend that this matter be reviewed In pre-bldand pre-contruction!n meetings. . Mckfilling of utility trenches In the floor tab subgrsde can be difficult. If the *all is wet, compaction to the specified density may be difficult, or not possible. The narrowly cut oper itrenches confined areas, uthethcontractorrmust plececthensoil linethin lifts Iteto S inched, oqtl p- the soil at the proper moisture content. This work As typically carried out by contractors other thuv the mans grading or earthwork contractor. we strongly recommend that the responsibility to carry out the compaction be clearly detailed in the applicable section of the specifications, and reviewed with the appropriate contractor and subcontractor. CMI CONCUITAOV:. INC. )amen R. Hill October 6, 1983 Mr. Dale Peterson Building Inspector 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: 114 ANb 15 BLOCK 7 I LLTOP ESTAT^ Dear Mr. Peterson: At the request of Sienna Corporation, we have taken field elevations on Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 7 to determine existing conditions for the purpose of suggesting methods of draining the rear yards of said lots. We have attached a plan with elevations and suggestions for your review and for assistance to the builder when constructing homes on Lots 14 and 15. You will note that the existing rear yard grade of the home on Lot 16 is 892.6 which,along with the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15, should drain to the curb on Blueberry Circle which is at an elevation of 891.9. Two methods are available: One: Fill the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 so that a drainage swale can be maintained from Lot 16 thru Lot 15 and then to the street. This will require up to six feet of fill in the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 and some filling on Lot 16; the swale will onl be a 0.3'+ percent grade because of the existing house grade on Lot 16. The drainage swale shown across the corner of Lot 14 and thru Lot 15 will have to be provided with an easement. Two: A second method for drainage would be to not fill the rear yards, let water pond, provide for an emergency overflow swale as shown on the attached drawings, and construct a "wet well" that may or may not slowly drain the ponding area. One or two soil borings should be required to determine if and at what depth a sandy stratum can be found. The effectiveness of the "wet well" will depend on the type of soil, perkolation, and mainte- nance. 8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH -BLOOM I NGTON• MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-884-3029 Mr. Dale Peterson RE: LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES October 6,:1983 page 2 The emergency swale must be constructed and maintained so..that homes are not flooded. The swale must have an easement across lot 14. In either method, Lot 15 must provide for (in deed) drainage of adjacent lots. Sincerely, JAMES R. HILL, INC. James R. Hill JRH/sh Enclosure cc: Sienna Bob Rosene Loren Spande jai t ie5 N. n i i i, it 1L. i alp VuPa-? JAr:*:s R. HILL ,`? ? ??-tA?nuh? 8200 , If?C, 4 9(?,Z Humboldt Ave So xyu ,?y x 98,7 X8 Bloomi, 3bn MN b 43i 893 `? 4t gi,S g9?1•9 y12.3 foo 7. 4p ru ?,g a?GE r6?.c ?t. j ` ss e '?? ?,s Y to ID aA B13.1 wlt~T to 644 L) 9y1, f?4`? i drr.9 sft.?1p L Vtq_ 7 ra F 0-44,621-6 6FZ-i v ?/Z SuJ?•L?; A ?4 6? Px-sauu?i? ?a-L 82Cp Humboldt go?'4 f0? ??Gl/? Bloomington, MN u55431 ------------- - a9?Nu? T /S 'U ,sfil?iv7'? e $qi.S 04,1 gf1.3 p ??? @fS.9 J6a9,2I X99s'.Z tF/ 1 88 6 010.7, d°Jl.4T .{ ' 1 C2 p x 690w??r SCA?C I fl: 5a' Bil.y ?7r, j /Zl ?? Byl, qa,S 8++.9 LU 0 $fi? ego a ???j2.5 - TRc 8yj, 8 8? k ??usF q l In lc? f' P9fs itic ,P '41L o' - TC of ?II I C r 9 2 e JJ.2S1.lllt._ 8203 t-lumboldl,'-,v., ?1 90? ?D 987 K89?,V /f 89t `I I / I`` g9i•S gyq.9 y12.3 A l?l cu oil. 1 4-- F81,7 l7? l Bt X Pic. 2 8tt?r? 11l•? ?IBllo `8g? 810,9 ?? I ? SCaL?. I //,?', ? e1L y sir f 8ft.i811LU 0 C?f yes ty rI ??CP1L 4?t? Z ,?1"Fo2 ` j eftsA?1?` c?-v b'%D• f'o x?ao ?o 00 SO CITY OF EAGAN WATER SERVICE PERMIT 3830 Pilot Knob Road P. O. Bpx 21199 PERMIT NO.: ?9 Eagan, M 121 * DATE: 9--1O-84 Zoning: ., ° I No. of Units: 1 Owner: SunshineConst Address ite Address Circle L14 '1';7 Hi1.lto;> ;':states 7 ^a 1 Plumber -{ 'i1?9t1?'S LTF er No : +' kQ fdnnection Charge: 47(). , Pd Size: , 'runt Deposit: 15. i.° •t P'.1 der io.: Pbhnit Fee 1 » s• 1 Pd I agree to comply with the City of Eagan Surcharge: • 5 Q !)a Ordino Misc. Charges: `)C; pd Peter Total: BY Date Paid: Date of Insp. Insp : . P? It- 3 S/ 73 L BL CITY USE ONLY RECEIPT zlj3 #: / SUBD. DATE:116 1995 PLUMBING PERMIT (RESIDENTIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN, MN 55122 (612) 681-4675 Please complete for: single family dwellings ? townhomes and condos when permits are required for each unit FIXTURES EACH NO. TOTAL Shower 3.00 x = Water Closet 3.00 x = Bath Tub 3.00 x = Lavatory 3.00 x = Kitchen Sink 3.00 x = Laundry Tray 3.00 x = Hot Tub/Spa 3.00 x = Water Heater 3.00 x = Floor Drain 3.00 x = Gas Piping Outlet * minimum - 1 3.00 x Rough Openings 1.50 x _ - Water Softener 5.00 x = Private Disposal * Dakota Cty. license 20.00 = U.G. Sprinkler * home under const. 3.00 = Alterations * to existing 20.00 = Water Turn Around 20.00 STATE SURCHARGE .50 TOTAL ------------- SITE ADDRESS: OWNER NAME:_ _____ INSTALLER NAME: "? r STREET ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE #: (7 () ? Y / ?/ CITY USE ONLY L BL SUBD. RECEIPT #: DATE: 1995 PLUMBING PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN, MN 55122 (612) 681-4675 Please complete for: all commercial/industrial buildings. ? multi-family buildings when separate permits are D-Qj required for each dwelling unit. DATE: CONTRACT PRICE: WORK TYPE: NEW CONSTRUCTION ADD ON REPAIR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: FEE: $25.00 minimum fee or 1% of contract price, whichever is greater. State surcharge of $.50 per $1,000 of rmi fee due on all permits. CONTRACT PRICE x 1% STATE SURCHARGE TOTAL SITE ADDRESS: TENANT NAME: STE. # OWNER NAME: INSTALLER: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE #: SIGNATURE: APPLICANT CITY OF EAGAN PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA117445 Date Issued:10/18/2013 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Cir Lot:14 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-140 Use: Description: Sub Type:Reroof Work Type:Replace Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Please print pictures of ice and water protection and leave on site. Carbon monoxide detectors are required by law in ALL single family homes . Vladislav Fogel Valuation: 4,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Michelle Ambrose 4150 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Estate Claim Services Llc 934 Cromwell Avenue, Suite 2 St Paul MN 55114 (651) 309-1114 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA128430 Date Issued:11/12/2014 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Cir Lot:14 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-140 Use: Description: Sub Type:Windows/Doors Work Type:Replace Description:Two or More Windows/Doors Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation. Carbon monoxide detectors are required by law in ALL single family homes . Valuation: 4,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Michelle Ambrose 4150 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Estate Claim Services Llc 934 Cromwell Avenue, Suite 2 St Paul MN 55114 (651) 309-1114 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA160722 Date Issued:04/07/2020 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Cir Lot:14 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-140 Use: Description: Sub Type:Windows/Doors Work Type:Replace Description:Two or More Windows/Doors Census Code:434 - Residential Additions, Alterations Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Valuation: 5,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $5K $118.00 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $5K $2.50 9001.2195 $120.50 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Michelle Ambrose 4150 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 (608) 487-0000 Renewal Andersen 1920 County Road C West Roseville MN 55113 (651) 264-4777 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing Permit Number:EA166200 Date Issued:12/18/2020 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4150 Blueberry Cir Lot:14 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-140 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Alteration Description:Fixtures Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Building Code). Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (miscellaneous)$59.00 0801.4087 Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Sean D & Michelle L Hogan 4150 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Minnesota Rusco 5010 Hwy 169 N Brooklyn Park MN 55428 (952) 935-9669 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature