Loading...
4154 Blueberry Cir PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type: Mechanical 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Permit Number: EA091345 Eagan, MN 55122 . Date Issued: 09/29/2009 (651) 675-5675~~~ EPermit Category: ePermit www.ci.eagan.mn.us lflflUl tflflLLL Site Address: 4154 Blueberry Cir Lot: 15 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID 10-33000-150-07 Use Description: Sub Type: e - Furnace Work Type: New Description: Furnace Comments: Quesetions regarding electrical permit requirements should be directed to Mark Anderson, State Electrical Inspector, 952-445-2840 CRAIG ANGELL 12253 NICOLLET AVE. S. Fee Summary: ME - Permit Fee (Replacements) $50.00 0801.4088 Surcharge-Fixed $0.50 9001.2195 Total: $50.50 Contractor: -Applicant - Owner: Angell Aire Edmund Dannecker 12253 Nicollet Ave S 4154 Blueberry Cir Burnsville MN 55337 Eagan MN 55123 (952) 746-5200 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature CITY Of EAGAN 10471 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 4548100 BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # Te be wed for DWG /GAR Est. Velue $90,000 Dote `3 Li 19 5 4.3.'x" 4 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect KI Occupancy R3 Site Address 15 HII.zO' Remodel ❑ Zoning F!1 Lot Block Sec/Sub. EST Repair ❑ Type of Const. V Parcel No. Addition ❑ No. Stories xaER 'AGE ENERGY ,s Move ❑ Length 40 sc Name .u Demolish ❑ Depth 41 Address 4655 itGC3L R Int. Impr. ❑ Sq. Ft. City Ii A AN Phone 452-5950 Install ❑ SAM 1, Approvels Fees Name zr Address Assessment Permit . 00 u1 City Phone Water & Sew. Surcharge 4 5. 00 Police Plan Review 201.50 toe Name Fire SAC -525:00 500 19 Address Eng. Water Conn. ` 0 0 City Phone Planner Water Meter .00 <'z 0 0 Council Road Unit 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that Bldg. Off. 5/26/i Tr. Pl. ' the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable APC Parks State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Var. Data Copies Signature of PermitteeJ H' . G: ENERGY R0ME5 Total ; A Building Permit Is issued to: an the express condition thv all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Mrrahes~ta Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official ice. Permit H~ Oift Telephone # 62 Q, 4 Z H.Y.A.IC. Eteq soft~ ffmpftfm IN" 1+. Other t ,1L It Foundadon Frame ftugh Pft Rough Mg. ? .1n*u6 Fireplaoa Final Htg. Final Pibg. Final G' water Onwibe loestion: wed l3aeler Pr/Bisp. Receipt PLUMBING PERMIT Permit No r CITY OF EAGAN 1 I{_ Fee fC ' t Fill in numbered spaces S/C ' Type or Print legibly " _ Tot 1. Datej d' 2. Installation Cost 3. Job Address c s r . t 4 Loth , a) Blkl rradt f , t 4. Owner IL At 77? C. i ° j'i Phone 5. Contractor c`i 6. Address Aw I. 7. City 4' /3 State # &")L-` Zip,. 8. Building Type: Residential Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ 9. Work Description: New 19~ Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ 10. Describe 11. No. Fixtures No. Fixtures Water Closet Cesspool/Drainfield _ Bath tubs Septic. Tank _ Lavatory Softner i Shower Well Kitchen Sink Urinal/Bidet Other Laundry Tray Floor Drains Drinking Ftn. Slop Sink Gas Piping Outlets 12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply with all orr k?ances and codes governing this type of work. Signed: for r Rough Final Inspections: Date Insp. Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved CITY OF EAGAN 454-8100 Receipt MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit No. t CITY OF EAGAN Fee fill in numbered spaces S/C Type or Print legibly Tot. >,°5 1. Date 1"~ r'{ 2. Installation Cost 3. Job Address e'l Lot f Blk. Tract_ 4. Owner t -it. t %1`r -i,` - t° Akl; S. Contractor - -ldLo'z 1 ~ Z Phone 6. Address 7. City i'.? 5°~lYl)l State Zip 8. Building Type: Residential Commercial ❑ Institutional ❑ 9. Work Description: New Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair. ❑ 10. Describe Fuel Type 11. No, Equipment BTU - M. Ea. No. Equipment CFM Forced Air fJ Me ~ Air Handling: Mfg. t+ Boilers Mech. Exhaust Mfg. Vel- V - ixl iii"-l- i . Unit Heater „ en i , Mfg. Other Air Cond. Mfg. Gas, Piping Outlets 12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply with all ordinances and codes governing this type of work. Signed : for Rough Final Inspections: Date Insp. Date Insp. This is your permit when numbered and approved. Approved CITY OF EAGAN 454-8100 CITY OF EAGAN Remarks - Addition HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 15 Blk 7 Parce► Owner- street 4154 Blueberry Circle State-Eagan, MN 55123 Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt- Date STREET SURF. 19a 13-M.72. 114. 7 10 802.04 AMAU 1 STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK A3 1973 172.14 8.61 20 T7,54 A _ * SEWER LATERAL I ()RO 1215-34 A21-SA in I P-1 WATERMAIN 9F WATER LATERAL ///I? jqgn 2 , - Ln I'r * WATER AREA - - Sprvi ec~c - 1980 - i * STORM SEW TRK 1980 - * STORM SEW LAT - 1980 CURB & GUTTER ( - SIDEWALK - STREET LIGHT Rr-.-4r3 iTni i- fiaRn no _ Gi2Q - I?ti ISt~ WATER CONN. n nn BUILDING PER. nA71 SAC PARK - PIE CTFO N- RE CITY OF EAGAN PERMIT TYPE: till # 11E t 104 3830 Pilot Knob Road Permit Number: Eagan; Minnesota 55122-1897 Date Issued: (651) 681-4675 SITE ADDRESS: , I if APPLICANT: is I f A tit t,# k 1; t { i ~t % i i t' ~ ~ ~ t to f PERM T SUBTYPE: TYPE OF WORK: • DATE INSPTR. INSPECTION TYPE DATE INSPTR. t i)tmt`'I tit; Permit Holder Date Tewphow # S WE WATER PLUMBING HVAC Inspection Date Insp. Comm ats FOOTINGS FOUND FRAMING ROOFING ROUGH PLUMBING PLSG AIR TEST ROUGH HEATING GAS SVC TEST INSUL ` GYP BOARD FIREPLACE FIREPLACE AIR TEST FINAL PLBG FINAL HTG ORSAT TEST BLDG FINAL DOMESTIC METER IRRIGATION METER FLUSH MAINS CONDUCTIVITY TEST HYDROSTATIC TEST BSMT R.I. BSMT FINAL DECK FTG DECK FINAL o CITY OF EAGAN ~g 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 x* a P H O N E: 454-8100 BUILAG PERMIT Receipt # To be used for nUMAM Est. Value $1 0000 Date Site Address 41$4 MAUXUtRY C1>Yfii. Lot 15 Block Sec/Sub. ULLT W UTA OFFICE USE ONLY Parcel No. Occupancy FEES Name Zoning z (Actual) Const Bldg. Permit c Address (Allowable) surcharge City Phone 432-11757 # of Stories Length Plan Review Name Depth p° Address 1 '110 III sac, city pa S.F. Total SAC. MCWCC Clty _ Phone -633-2561 S.F. Footprints - On Site Sewage Water Conn" W Name On Site Well Address Water Meter 12 MWCC System ~w Acct. Deposit City Phone `City Water - PRV Required S/W Permit I hereby acknowlege that I have read this application and state that the Booster Pump S/VJ Surcharge information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Treatment P1 Signature of Permitee < APPROVALS Road Unit A Building Permit is issued to.. Planner Park Ded. on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordance with all Council applicable State of Minnesota Statut and City of Eagan Ordinances. Bldg. Off. Copies Building Official - Variance TOTAL * p Kok pow* iti€Jk.G a Ante WAIL i Fa*ft NO" pool e i QlW Tt AW ft* flb - Molity PWIVAW oona mew i 1 DO* Fad wim P`c. Cop. a i _ ~~q~' rqE q,~r".,'.'°t!'~.",g3s. y..w 'p'r.c:~... Z,..., n •~-s~ .T.,~.~-..,,.-_ .,~r": $ CITY OF EAGAN t a, • 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 454-8100 BUILAG PERMIT Receipt # To be used for nUMAM Est. Value fZrwo Date-jvuy !2 1991 Site Address --L4-154 M CIR= Lot 13 Block Sec/Sub. '~71.4t UI A OFFICE USE ONLY Parcel No. Occupancy FEES Zoning 0 "Man $250 Name (Actual) Const Bldg. Permit w Address (Allowable) Surcharge City Phone # of Stories - Length Plan Review Name n Depth 8102 Address AM 9 IlrAIMIIIN S.F. Total sAac SC, City City Ir10i=YI1.trE Phone 633-2561 S.F. Footprints , Mcwcc r-~ On Site Sewage Water Conn °W Name On ~ On Site Well Water Meter - Address MWCC System _ 15.1 City Phone City Water Acct. Deposit PRV Required S/W Permit t hereby acknowlege that I have read this application and state that the Booster Pump S/W Surcharge information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Treatment PI Signature of Permitee APPROVALS Road Unit A Building Permit is issued to.. Planner Park Ded. on the express condition that all,work shall be done in accordance with all Council applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan,Ordinances. Bldg. Off. Copies % Building Official - * Variance TOTAL 49 11e, t4aa Rt MAO s G I t , 3 f Fbw Omw T P!p D1* M" r f i This request void 18 months from Q I-A 41 L(gr6? h'11too -Go Re a ere No. Rough-m Inspection eq es ? []No ~ReadY N 4I1 Notifv.lnspec for When Ready Licensed ectrical Contractor I hereby request inspection of above ❑ Owner electrical work installed at: Street ddress, Box or R to No. City I 5A ection No. Township Name or No. Range No. C Occupan P INT) Phone N r tS 14S.ZP-5-70 P Supplier A , ► I-A- e~ cra Ele tr cal Contractor (Company Name) Contr tor's icense No. ),Lr0_, O2- 1 Mailing Address (Contractor or wnerMpKng Inst Ilation) ~ ALtho ized ignature (Co rac vun aking Installation) Phone Number rj MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT Griggs-Midway Bldg. - Room N-191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE BOARD 1821 University Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104 UNLESS PROPER INSPECTION FEE IS Phone (612) 297.2111 ENCLOSED. E13-00001- REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION JIM 1 ' See instructions for completing this form on back of yellow copy. A , V 9 2 4 1 ""X" Below work Covered by This Request Add Rep. Type of Building Appliances Wired Equipment Wired Home Range Temporary Service Duplex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Building Dryer Electric Heatin ` Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm Other (Specify ther(Specify) t er Specify Other Other Compute Inspection Fee Below # Fee Service Entrance Size # Fee Feeders /Subfeeders # Fee Circuits i 0to200Amps 0to30Amps 0to 30Am Above 200 Amps' 31 to 100 Amps 31 to 100 Amps Swimming Pool Above 100-Amps Above 100_Amps Transformers Irrigation Booms Partial/Other Fee Signs Special Inspection 3 Remarks V TOTAL 1,FE Rough-in Date 1. the EI et"eal Inspector, hereby certify that the above Final s Date inspection has been made. This requestvold 18 months from r 2006 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 New Construction Requirements Remodel/Repair Requirements O; ice `se On- 3 registered site surreys showing sq. ft. of lot, sq. ft. of house; and all roofed areas 2 copies of plan showing footings, beams, joists e t of Swvay Recd PJ (20% maximum lot coverage allowed) 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions Tree PI3o Recd _ Y _ rd 2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, etc. 1 site survey for additions & decks Tie P-_ s Fc,i a 0, d 1 set of Energy Calculations Addition - indicate if on-site septic system ;c;pt n y s teri N 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan if lot platted after 7/1/93 Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (buildings with 3 or less units) Minnegasco mechanical ventilation form ' Dato_ / / Construction Cost ~ / Site Address Unit/Ste # Description of Work CA,/ yO Multi-Family Bldg _ Y N Fireplace(s) 0 2 Property Owner Telephone # (~taj Dltd ^ 25O-A RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN Contractor 1920 COUNTY RD. "C WEST Address ROSEVILLE, MN 55119 City State 651-264-4777 Telephone # ( ) LICENSE #20130983 COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING Minnesota Rules 7670 Catesr~ _ Minnesota Rules 7672 Energy Code Category • Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet New Energy Code Worksheet (4 submission type) Submitted Submitted • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? . - Y - N If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber Telephone ) Mechanical Contractor Telephone ) Sewer/Water Contractor Telephone ) I hereby apply for a Residential Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a pe it; that the work will be in accordance with the approved Ian in the case of work which requires a review and a oval of plans. &)reX&'o son Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature s DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Sub Types ❑ 01 Foundation ❑ 07 05-plex ❑ 13 16-plex ❑ 20 Pool ❑ 30 Accessory Bldg ❑ 02 SF Dwelling ❑ 08 06-plex ❑ 16 Fireplace ❑ 21 Porch (3-sea.) ❑ 31 Ext. Alt - Multi ❑ 03 01 of_ plex ❑ 09 07-plex ❑ 17 Garage ❑ 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ❑ 33 Ext. Alt - SF ❑ 04 02-plex ❑ 10 08-plex ❑ 18 Deck ❑ 23 Porch (screen/gazebo) ❑ 36 Multi Misc. ❑ 05 03-plex ❑ 11 10-plex ❑ 19 Lower Level ❑ 24 Storm Damage ❑ 06 04-plex ❑ 12 12-plex ❑ 25 Miscellaneous Work Types ❑ 31 New ❑ 35 Int Improvement ❑ 38 Demolish Interior ❑ 44 Siding ❑ 32 Addition ❑ 36 Move Building ❑ 42 Demolish Foundation ❑ 45 Fire Repair ❑ 33 Alteration ❑ 37 Demolish Building* ❑ 43 Reroof ❑ 46 Windows/Doors ❑ 34 Replacement *Demolition (Entire Bldg) - Give PCA handout to applicant Description: Water Damage Yes Valuation Occupancy MCES System Plan Review 100% or 25% Census Code Zoning City Water SAC Units Stories Booster Pump # of Units Sq. Ft. PRV # of Bldgs Length Fire Sprinklered Type of Const Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS - Footings (new bldg) _ Sheetrock - Footings (deck) _ Final/C.O. - Footings (addition) _ Final/No C.O. _ Foundation _ HVAC _ Drain Tile Other Roof - Ice & Water _ Final _ Pool Ftgs Air/Gas Tests Final - Framing _ Siding _ Stucco Lath - Stone Lath -Brick - Fireplace _ R.I. - Air Test _ Final _ Windows - Insulation _ Retaining Wall Approved By: Building Inspector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant License Search Copies Other Total VVd vd t &v-d.L re l knot mol City of Eagan. 3836 Pilot Knob Road Eager, MN 55122 To whom it may Concem: Elder .Tones i8 authorized to , . - Flder Ions to pull btUlding permits for Rcneviral by AttdarsmL Picric allow provide this pervicc for us in date bcyand 616101; until a anewaj by Mim. ~Ttia anthOdzadOn Is valid for any to the Cify_ manaM eVreftlY revokes it In writing our request thYS autlio~tion be a ted.expe&tiousl as . building pcantts y fuzthcr. Please cad me If thew arc nnot n delay in contacted the ~g of t cted at X63-502-4706 Y queStlona: I can be Your Imnigaaft xttcation to smatter IS a ated. - Siiioc~ialy, . .y/ . s 3nnvrtd "R. Rau hstallatPon manager Renewal by Andcrscn COMOr4on T-CRm Rhirx Ton"- 4` a~ n. MY Mo ct.h4 tr,zphq Received Ti~e Jue. 1:07P~d- - WAIVER OF HEARING NO. 00152 Special Assessment~Authorization I/We hereby request and authorize the City of Eagan, MN (Dakota Co.) to assess the following described property owned by me/us: Lot 15, Block Hilltop Estates_-- pSq for the benefit received om the following improvements: ITEM QUANTITY {LATE AMOUNT PROJECT Storm sewer outlet Lump sum $1,500.00 • $1500.00 .481 to be spread over TOTAL~~po.oo 15 years at an annual interest rate of io.o against any remaining...unpaid balances. The undersigned, for themselves, their heirs, executors,.administrators successors and assigns, hereby consent to the levy of these assessments, and further, hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary, and waive objections to any technical defects in any proceedings related to these assessments, and further waive the right to object to or appeal from these assessments made, pursuant to this agreement. Dated: Edmund Dannecker Susan Dannecker STATE OF SS COUNTY QF~ ~i~, ) on this day of or/c7yis~,~X~_ 1416 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeare4_,C2^e,:V, JG~S, P.41-k)~_ rt -to me personally known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that » execute he same as,-- free act and deed. / 1~" 4QrAsa9 1M 11AAdA"AA,%X • DIM -E AA EL~STAD Notary Public This Document Drafted By: mmi.n xE scc~:XCOUNTY s h-rie 27,199, Hauge, Smith, Eidc $ keller, P.A. APPROV sV"' ~~svvvw~uvw~tt 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, Minnesota SS122 (612) 4S4-4224 Fagan Pu lid r s Director ' Revised: 8-30-82 PERMIT CITY OF EAGAN PERMIT TYPE: BUILDING 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Permit Number: 034562 (651) 681.-4675 Date Issued: 02/221/99 SITE ADDRESS: 4154 BLUEBERRY CIR LOT: 15 BLOCK: 7 NILL.TaP ESTATES` P o I . N 10-33800-150-07 DESCRIPTION: T, O a & REROOF Bir~_1~ii rin F-'- r-mi tTvpe STORM DAMAGE F3 tii,tdi.~7a 'r.lo: fvP REPAIR ~ode 434: ALT. RESIDENTIAL REMARKS: FEE SUMMARY ZTMTR GTOR• Applicant ST. LIC- OWNER: AEC ROQFIN& 18950040 20139140 DANNECKER ED 115~3 RUPP R51 4154 BLUEBERRY CIR SURNSVILLE MN 55337 EAOAN MN 55122 R(622) 895-0040 (651}45-r -r I he: ehv acknowi edq rlri' t3 1 oI 7.-5 C t'i i' C 1'd r1 Y f C' 1 c1 C fll 1-v .d 1 1_ f9 - ra, .t d 'i n :t 7. C h s? '1 " (1 iYl fl o rl d J . APPLICANTIPER641TEE SIGNATURE UED BY-`SIGNATURE CITY USE ONLY LOT BL / RECEIPT 9toj? 3.;7- SUBD. / RECEIPT DATE: 7 1997 MECHANICAL PERMIT (RESIDENTIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN MN 55122 Date: 41 a-i / 99 (612) 681-4675 -~~Complete this section only if you are installing HVAC in single family, townhome or condos that are ~ under construction and are not owner /occupied. • HVAC: 0-100 M B T U $ 24.00 ADDITIONAL 50 M BTU 6.00 • Gas outlets (minimum of one required @ $3.00 ea.) • State Surcharge: .50 • TOTAL: Complete this section only if you are remodeling,, adding to, or repairing existing single family dwellings, townhomes, or condos. Add-on furnace Add on air conditioning Add-on air exchanger, i.e. Vanee system, etc. Other Minimum fee applies to --ll remodel or add-ons of existing residences $ 20.00 State Surcharge .50 Total: $ 20.50 SITE ADDRESS: `7 15 '7 f t-t e q~ rC OWNER NAME: Gi Nn /'1L' Gk-4-` PHONE 9-7 5 k i i a v~JF- 4-i" , INSTALLER N i SlM N-~ - PHONE _a -7 - STREET ADDRESS: C- CITY: STATE: A,) ZIP: 5~ a SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE CITY USE ONLY L SL RECEIPT: SUED. RECEIPT DATE: 1997 MECHANICAL PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN, MN $5122 (612) 681.4675 Please complete for. ► all commenciallindustrial buildings. ► mull-family buildings when separate permits are W required for each dwelling unit. DATE: CONTRACT PRICE: WORK TYPE: NEW CONSTRUCTION INTERIOR IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION OF WORK: FEES: $25.00 minimum fee Qs 1% of contract price, whichever is greater. ► Processed piping - $25.00 ► State surcharge of $.50 per $1,000 of permit fee due on all permits. CONTRACT PRICE x 1 % PROCESSED PIPING STATE SURCHARGE TOTAL SITE ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: TELEPHONE TENANT NAME: (IMPROVEMENTS ONLY) INSTALLER: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE* SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE CITY INSPECTOR Y_01~EAGAN WATER SERVICE PERMIT 3830 Pilot Knot Road`' ~ ~37t7 P. G. Box 21188 - PERMIT NO.: EaDait, MN- 551,2,1 " DATE: 7-9-85 ZorlYng. R1 No. of Units: 1 Owner. Heritage Energy Homes Address:, Site Address: 4154 ki;Jerry C3cle L15 B7 Hilltop Estates Plumber: = akotc ?1 Lr,u d l ' 2S Meter No. _ r Hiton Charge: 500.00 pd ti „ y 15.00 Sire: uRteDeposit: Reader islo.: ~ e: 10.00 1 ogres to -010* City of logo" Surcharge: • 50 ordinone«. Misc. Charges 132.00 pd r Total: 63.00 Dd meter BY Vote Paid: Date of ( sp.: Insp. CITY OF EAGAro 3830 Not K WATER SjR ' _ pjkV P.-O. Box 249, Rog,~ PERMIT No.: 6370 Eagan, MN 56 z 1~00 Z DATE: _ 7"9-85 Zoning: ~ owner, . Hari No. of Units: te > Address: Site Address: 4154 +iebet!e Plumber uaxor-a PI tmbina Meter No.: Connection Chuow 9FSR{ Size: Account Deposit. 15.00 Reader No.: Permit Fee: lf?.0fl 1 "te. to eaw* wick tow Cty of Eagan Surcharge: .S , O"llwanew AM*,. Chorgew 1 32.,00 BY TOW. Dote of insp.: dote Paid: insp. CITY OF f AGAN SEWER SERVXX PERM 3830 Pilot Knob Road 7559 P. O. Box 21199 Ptpma NO.: Eagan, MN 55121 DATE: 7-9-85 Zoning: R1 No. of Units: Owner: H*r:Ltage Energy Rou" Address: _ Site Address: _ 4154 Blueberry Circle L1$ 37 1411t©P tats Plumber: Dakota PlArbng 6-26--85 53098 100- t eyree to comply wHh the City of Eeger Connection. Charge: 425.00 V4 Ordineeees. Account Deposit: 15.00 Permit Fee: 10.00 Surcharge: BY Misc. Charges: Dote of Insp.. Total: Insp.: Date Paid: I 2/84 7 t CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR PERMIT JL= SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION (PLEASE PRINT) l) PROPERTY ADDRESS : y )Lz- 141 j3 L y - Z, ,~'1 n L/ C n c L LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Lot/Block/Subdivision or Tax Parcel I.D. Number) IF EX1 T__2:G STRUCTURE, DATE OF ORIGI dAL E ILDD,,rG PE.:~?IT 1=AiNC°: PRES" rT :'-w ' T'/P:~POSED s=_: ~l SINGLE FAM - jTY ❑ R-2 DUPLE (T6NU UNITS) ❑ R-3 TOiNMiCUSE (THREE + UNITS) ( UNITS) ❑ R-4 ApAR=NT/CONDa-,1I1IUm ( UNITS) ❑ COMMERCIAL/=AIL/OFFICE ❑ IIMUSTRIAL ❑ INSTITUTIONAL/GOVE NL MENT 2) APPLICPti'T (PLEASE PRINT) NAME : ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: 3) PL mBER PLEASE PRINT) FOR CITY USE ONLY NAME: t7AKO PL t+6 PLUMBERS LICENSE: ADDRESS: Active CITY, STATE, ZIP: Expired ",.itrZ 0 Not of Record PHONE: PLUMBER LICENSE # Starr 1171a 4) OCCUPANT/Cr, zTER (PLEASE PRINT) NAME : "-21i 72, & Z ADDRESS : LJ S 'V I G l 0L _217> CITY, STATE, ZIP ,J PHONE: 5) INDICATE WHICH PERMIT IS BEINIG REQUESTED: %12,4ECTION TO CITY SEWER ;CO NNECTION TO CITY WATER ❑ O= (PLEASE DESCRIBE) 6) DZICA 'LE ONE: ❑ PLEASE HOLD APPROVED PERMIT FOR PICK-UP BY ONE OF ABOVE ❑ PLEASE MAIL APPROVED PERtiLIT TO 1, 203 4 ABOVE (Circle one) 7) SI&%TATCRE: DATE: Y 1 OR E amiam sliammii;imuR F O R C I T Y U S E O N L Y PERMIT ISSUED FEES: $ /D. 50 SET,; ER P=,lIT T` CL--DE SURCHARGE) $ 16.!50 WATER PERP4IT (INCLUDE SURCHARGE) 6/1_?Ll-rv WATER METER/COPPERHORN/OUTSIDE READER $ WATER TAP (INCLUDE CORPORATION STOP) $ SEWER TAP $ ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - SEWER ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - WATER $ WAC $ SAC $ TRUNK WATER ASSESSMENT $ TRUNK SEWER ASSESSMENT $ LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK SEWER $ LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK WATER $ /3a OTHER $ TOTAL $ jtrb AMOUNT PAID/RECEIPT # J 2,. DOES UTILITY CONNECTION REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY? C] YES IF YES, THEN A "PERMIT FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC ROADWAY" MUST BE ISSUED BY THE N0 ENGINEERING DIVISION. LIST AS A CONDI- TION. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE : s~ WWM w m it owzm Aftm a* npm r4 wPG pla 40"M go ow:n spq w.-mst w jw 01~W R-m P*w of w" M . y Rv. NIM Suite 608.4940 Viking Drive • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435.612-835-2808 CORPORATION January 17, 1985 Wally Hafstad Heritage Energy Homes, Inc. 4655 Nicols Road Eagan, MN 55123 Re: Lot 15, Block 7, Hilltop Estates Dear Wally: Enclosed please 'find two copies of an agreement which we have prepared in connection with the additional off site storm sewer connection charge on the above referenced lot. Please sign both copies of the agreement and return them to me, I will return to you a fully executed copy for your files. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, e"Leslie A. Davison enclosure i AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this day of , 1985, by and between SIENNA CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation ("Seller") and HERITAGE ENERGY HOMES, INC.,, a Minnesota corporation ("Buyer"); WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Purchase Agreement dated November 27, 1984 with respect to Lot 15, Block 7, Hilltop Estates; and WHEREAS, Additional work was done which was of benefit to said lot, for which the Seller has been billed; and NOW THEREFORE, Buyer hereby agrees to pay to Seller, at closing, an additional $1,380.00 for off site storm sewer connection and installation of 69 feet of 12 `inch P.V.C. pipe. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed the day and year first above written. SELLER SIENNA CORPORATION By Its BUYER HERITAGE ENERGY HOMES, INC. By Its CITY OF EAGAN No 1 0 4 7 1 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121C t PHONE: 4548100 1~ BUILDING PERMIT Receipt * To be wed far SF DWG/GAR Est. Volue $90,000 Date JUNE 26 , 19_15 Site Address 4154 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect 2:1 Occupancy R3 Lot 15 Block -----Z-Sec/Sub. HILLTOP EST Remodel ❑ Zoning Rl Parcel No. Repair ❑ Type of Const V . Addition ❑ No. Stories Name HERITAGE ENERGY HOMES Move 11 Length 40 w Demolish ❑ Depth 41 Address 4655 NICOLS RD Int.lmpr. ❑ Sq. Ft. b City EAGAN phone 452-5950 Install ❑ SAME Approvals Fees Name BU Address Assessment Permit =03-00 City Phone Water 8 Sew. Surcharge 4 5 . 0 0 Police Plan Review --2-0-L-5 0 525.00 0 us Name Fire SAC PLU 11 Address Eng. Water Conn. 500.00 UL9 W City Phone Planner Water Meter 6 3. 0 0 Council Road Unit 280.00 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that Bldg. Off. 6/26.L-8r Tr. Pl. 132.00 the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable APC Parks State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Var. Date Copies Signature of Perrnittee Total $2,149.50 HERITAGE ENERGY HOMES A Building Permit is issued to: on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordance h applicable S of ne to Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official ~t7 - i 1985 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF EAGAN NOTE: ALL CONTRACTORS MUST BE LICENSED WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN INCLUDE 2 SETS OF PLANS 3 CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS f l~ To Be Used Fort;'j6NLS- Valuation : 9 0(000 • st Date: Site Address: L~S L~ &k" -6f,~ 0-1kLC, OFFICE USE ONLY Lot: 15- Block Sect/Sub ~ILLI-b 10 Erect Occupancy -3 C;3~jWfrS Remodel Zoning -l Parcel # D Repair Type of Const_ Enlarge # of Stories Owner Move Length ~o Demolish Depth Address Grade Sq Ft City/Zip Code Phone APPROVALS Contractorj4C72Yf W& 649,a~ Assessments Permit . Water/Sewer Surcharge 45, Address ilk cy" *=D Police Plan Review C) I. SO Fire SAC SZ5, City/Zip Code /'r~ ~S 1 as Engr Water Conn 50© . Planner Water Meter to3_ Phone 30 - 5~'t1 Council )lead Unit 260. ° Bldg Of Parks Arch./Engr. APC ` Treatment Pl (32. Variance cc Address TOTAL` c~ City/Zip Code Phone # c~L ra p ~ 1~1 n 4 ' ~ (oo 14-1040 x I 12cQ x S4 2Z ~ 22 = 14a4 x i i ~ S 324 l~ x ~~0 4~ - 3< <c~o IZ(o 4~ 4 'ertificate for: Bk: 92%1 Heritage Energy Homes Inc. 4655 Nicols Road , Eagan, Minnesota 55122 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS. INC RPa,ste,ea Under Laws of the State of Minnesota 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT• MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 423-1769 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE S8 -7- 3 7" ~ / Drainage and Utility ti Easement / Seale: 1 inch 30 Peet tie .vorsL? ao O Denotes Iron monument o Denotes set wood hub 0 /6 e pc~ to g45.S Denotes existing elevation / , e i c JP3 ~ b W 67 Denotes proposed elevation v vb f~ \ rev 1PN X93 NI/ Proposed garage floor elev. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of Lot 15, Block 7, HILLTOP ESTATES, amcording to the recorded plat there- of, Dakota County, Minnesota. Also showing the location of a pOoposed hour as staked th reon. Dated : June 24, 1985 MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 25 4 EXTERIOR ENVELOPE AVERAGE "U" COMPUTATION TIE ADDRESS : C- ONTRACTOR: DATE : PHONE : `7-T 94 1 { DETERMINE WORKING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH: 1 TOTA1. EXPOSED WALL AREA, ft x "U" : r 614 , 1 TOTAL ROOF/CEILING AREA. 27d sq ft x "U" A bald • ?7~jTOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS: Total exposed wail area above floor..,..... . sq ft a) Total well window area: q 1 azed, ` (~C~ sq ft x "U" CPZ glazed...... sq ft x Bull • b) Total door area sq ft x "U" :7 c) Total sliding glass door area: glazed...., . I sq ft x 'lull L y~ ,G72 glazed...... ® sq ft x 'lull d) Total fireplace wall area sq ft x "U" • e) Total wall framing area (Average lot)........... sq• ft x flUll , ,7q f) Total net wall area above floor (insulated) (insulated)....... _ sq ft x "U" g) Total rim joist area......12~ sq ft x "U" • . n Total, foundation area (Exposed).......... sq ft h) Total foundation window area sq ft x sluff 1) Total net foundation area above grade ' eq ft x „U„ TOTAL a) thru 1) If `.)'tem 113 I, the° lame as, or less than Item P1, you have met the Intent of 1 2 WAR 1.16008 A and 0. Page 1 TOTAL EXPOSED ROOF/CEILING CALCULATIONS: Total exposed j roof/caillnq area........ 'y d sq ft J) Total skylight area....... sq ft x $V" k) Total roof/ceillnq framing area (Average 1Mt)...... sq ft x "tl" rC>2to 0 • '~l• 1) Total net insulated roof/ceiling area....... 1 sq ft x "U" ~G"rZ2 Z TOTAL J) t h ru 1) 5 f total of 04 is the same as, or less than 02. you have met the Intent of MCAR 1.16008 A and 0. ~j ~j L ?~?7 O ~L i ALTERNATE BUILDING ENVELOPE DESIGN 'o utilize the total envelope system method, the values established by the sum .)f hews 03 and 04 shall not be greater than the sum of items 01 and 02. 3. ♦ 4. - i i CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that i have calculated the "U" factors and "n" ,slues herein and that the building here described meets or exceeds the State )f Ninnesota Energy Conservation Act. r 1 131qnsture) • _ 2~ (0 STi.lvS ~ to • CONSTRUCTION R VALUE WALL FRAMING SECTION:. ; 1 Interior e)r film 0,6111 1 k.' f i0 ft ;&We L• 11 / 2.010 S • F-xtro r m • ---TOTAL A WALL SECTION (11{"LATE0) XI - Interior air film A.RA 2. L s. 1 Wis. Idl. 0 4 i r,. Z.vto 5 st I R. x o air film • Z•. TOTAL It Y • I/A • RIM JOIST SECTIONi 1 Interior air film n.6A 2 'os 11.7 e1\ :3 I Z , I em sivwiA - • 81 6 Exte- or air Film A. A •to FOUNDATION INSULATION REQUIRED: Min. R-5 on entire wall OR U • i/R • p•~•,•,~ Min. R-10 down to frost depth FOUNDATION SECTION t . I Interior air film A. AR ' 2 I sf~jt t~J"5 4.a 3 •1 c•b I.tb .~#Ar A. --•(4 EJCtei oar air N 4•17 ' r ✓'4 TOTAL R • •1-5, U e 1/R • ILP SLAB ON ORAK . • Heated Slabs: : p+.~ • ai► •s, • Minimum R • 9,.5 ,..4. Unheated Slabs : 4 , ' • q ; low A - 6.2 a it, 4: • 101STRIICTIoN _ R V`ALUC COLINR SECTION (INSULATEW: 1 Interior air film (1.6 _ ~«rr- l~.J I► J'S . v n 3 4 x r l or • r I tw (s t i_11) TOTAL R• U • 1/0 MAO CEILING FRAMING SECTION: 2 5 1 Interior air film 0.61 F -IMO = t. s 3. ftawv b#6- AIR VENTED FLOW 4 interior air s soft wood Z-004 I TOTAL R ' Y• 1/R~ •~u' • CEILING SECTION (INSULATEW Ali Interior air film 4.61 . 2 G xtor o r film (still) TOTAL R U• 1/R• I 2 3 4 S CEILINR FRAMING SECTION: 1• Interior air film 0.61 VENTED R 3 Mir for air film (still) S ~ inches sot wood TOTAL R • .j U• 11R• 3 a 5 •"'4 1 Inside air film N•61 I-T aim INSTANT TESTING COMPANY 4000 BEAU D' RUE DRIVE C 0 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 CEDAR AVE. at T.H. 13 r PORTABLE TESTING OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS G- J, KOPACEK, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CALL 454-3544 INSPECTION REPORT Project: Hilltop Estates Lot 15 Block 7 4154 Blueberry Circle Client: Heritage Energy Homes Date of Inspection: June 19, 1985 Arrived at site 8:50 a.m. 6/19/85. Oak and Boxelder trees of about 8" diameter had been cleared and grubbea from the site prior to excavation. The excavation was complete with some fill already placed. There was 4 loads of fill dumped in the southwest corner of the excavation. The excavation was 53' east to west and 37' north to south and sloped downward to the northwest corner. Radiating out with a radius of 20' from the northwest corner was a deeper area with a bottom consisting of grey silty clay. There was about a 1 square yard pud- dle of water seepage. The elevation of the northwest corner was 11.8' below the sewer manhole in front of the lot. Footing elevation was about 4.4' above the low north- west corner. The southwest excavation corner was 5.7' higher and the northeast was 4.3' higher then the northwest corner. Most of the excavation was at foot- ing grade or higher. Therefore, oversizing was neces- sary only in the northwest building corner. The pro- posed house was 38' x 261, there seems to be adaquate over sizing. The proposed house was not staked, pre- venting the measurement of the exact oversizing. Two hand auger borings were done to a depth of 3-1/2'. The soil consisted of a sand in the southwest corner and a silty sand in the northeast corner. Inspector: Kevin Matteson Instant Testing Ccmpany FIELD DDE ITY TEST REPORT INSTANT TESTIN COMPANY ` 4000 BEAU D' RUE DRIVE C 0 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 CEDAR AVE. at T.H. 13 PORTABLE TESTING OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS G J KpPACEK. PRC)FESS70NA ENGINEER CALL 45A-3".A Rees a won N 7254 South, Office 454-3544 North Office 572-11170 IN LACE DD"S IT' =T RE ULM Date June 21, 1985 For Heritage Energy Homes Location 4154 Blueberry Circle Tests Aut-iorized PY Brad Johnson Project No. Date TesteB June 2), 1985 at 10:30 A.M. P.M. Area Tested House Pad Backfill 7es t '~u-fir : 1 i2 Location 4154 B ueberry oust NW Corner JNW Corner Housepad lHousepad 2' Below Foot- Surface of Sing grade IFooting Grade • ~ f I r Scil Classl -_-:cation + Sand Sand f Mci E re De-IEd ty j j Percen t Mcis ture 7.7 8.2 ° t der:: Op-~ mu^~ - { M= = t,,,,((rF 15.4 15,4 0 53 1-T -Ien s 1 t}' 1115.2 1114.6 ! Standard Max~:.u j Dens tv ° 111.1 x111.1 Rel a ti :rE Der s t~, i f Percent 104 1103 Re L.irej Relative re-ns_ t-~ 95+ i 95+ I j Re7maLrks: Meet Requirements, relative density results based on standard proctor Note: compacted with CAT Copies to; Heitage Energy Homes Charge Cade 2 - #306 + Hrly - 1601 (1 Miles S ia:led { TEST REPORT INSTANT TESTINU` COMPANY ~ s 4004 BEAU D' RUE DRIVE EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 CEDAR AVE. at T.H. 13 PORTABLE TESTING OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS G KOFAGEK PFOFESScONAL ENGINEER GALL 45A 3644 For Heritage Energy Homes _ ioestiom 4154 E5ueberry Circle suBrl"ac by Charles, ITCO J" "c. Laboratory N4,,vt ► HEH-1 ostB June 21, 1985 Tat Raa;fu or Sample of In In ace Backfi l l Material Sampled June 20, 1985 at A.M. P.M. Samp4dfrom House Dad 4154 Blueberry Circle S.mp>traprlBanutlraof Field Density Tests 1 & 2 Moisture Density Test ASTM D698-70, Method C Curve Number: 1 Visual Soil Class: Sand Standard Maximum Dry Density: 111.1 PCF Optimum Moisture: 15.4% CI.0,p Code 1 #303, 1 - #302 Mils f G: sqmw &VIA -w/ 77 7- Q. J. Kcom wl rtofewionB! Frghm 1h4wilt+on NO. rJ" FIELD DE2E ITY MT REPORT INSTANT TESTING COMPANY 4000 BEAU D' RUE DRIVE .1,T EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 CEDAR AVE. at T.H. 13 PORTABLE TESTING OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS G KOPACEK. PROFESS!ON'AL ENC~NEER GALL 45-4-3544 7/254 South Oflice 451-3544 Worth Office 572-1570 IN'PLAC"E DE'tSITY TI-ST RESUL•IS Date June 25, 1985 For Heritage Energy Homes Location 4154 Blueberry Circle Tests Authorized By same Project No. Date Tested June 24, 1985 -at A.M. P.M. Area Te ted Housepad Backfill, Northwest Corner Te= tisr 1 3 4 Lc}gat or. i ort west Corner o House a ~ I 1-ZI below j Surface Surface f Soil C ass fication Sand S i l t Sand/Silt Lumps Lumps 14-- t,: e Den=y t}' j 2 2 I Pe er: t Ne01s rur E i 8.6 8.2 j S tan rc op-1m i I I M ~ S t ~ r e 11.4 11.4 Re'_a vE Mc1E r'ar 75 72 Dl -v Den_c G - 117.2 i 122.9 j t Standard Max_T<<.LT '_?e: k= tv 116.7 116.7 RE,a 1ve D`^si r; j Percent 100 105 I Res.:1red Re at2Ve 95+ 45+ f Re7,a<k-- Meet Requirements, relative density results based on standard proctor Copies to: Heritage Energy Homes A•rr C1-arge Cock_-_ 2 - #306 + Hrly - #601 (1) Miles 7 - #612 Signed a TEST REPORT INSTANT TESTING COMPANY 4000 BEAU D' RUE DRIVE EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 L) U CEDAR AVE. at T.H. 13 iORTkaLE TESTING OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS G J KOPA CEK, PROFESSIONZ ENGINEER CALL 1115A 3544 Foe Heritage Energy Homes Loostion 415' _Slueberry Circle SWUN!"Ca BY Charles, ITCO JOB W0. Laborstory N.rmvr HEH -2 Oct$ June 25, 1985 Test Ras,,tttorSampbof Inplace Backfi l l Material Ssmpled June 24' 1985 at A.M. F.M. Sampwdfrom Northwest Corner of House - Pad Backfill Samp4 rsprowntativs of Field QQns i k4 TF5 t5 I F tI fnr June 24, 1285 Moisture Density Test ASTM D698-70, Method C Curve Number: 2 Visual Soil Class: Sand with Silt Lumps Standard Maximum Dry Density: 116.7 PCF Optimum Moisture: 11.4% C'tirP C.odo 00-1 Miia ° 6t. Kopwr► rrsl~rwiortst En~k~rr - lir~~tration t+fo. 7?b4 . PARCEL FILE s 4154 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE CRV ®F alga '1 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH June 12, 1986 VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members MR AND MRS STEVE REED THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator 4150 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE. EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE EAGAN, MN 55123 City Clerk Re: Storm Water Drainage Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reed: Hopefully our meeting that was held Thursday, June 5 was beneficial and the storm water problem will be resolved in the near future so all three (3) property owners can complete their landscaping. It is unfortunate that the builder of Lot 16 did not use the elevation as recommended by Sienna Corporation at the time the home was constructed. The elevations for Lots 14 and 15 were determined by the building that occurred on Lot 16. With three (3) builders involved with Lots 14, 15 and 16 it can be a problem, given the circumstances, to resolve the drainage issue that has been created. Hopefully the wet well that was proposed as an alternative by the engineering firm of Jim Hill and Associates, representing Sienna Corporation, will provide proper resolution to the water ponding that has occurred since the three lots were developed. As I discussed at our meeting last Thursday, the City does not typically involve itself with matters that are considered private property and normally can only be resolved between a property owner and his or her builder. However, because this drainage issue directly affects three (3) properties and could indirectly impact two (2) adjacent properties, Lots 12 and 13, it seemed appropriate that the City attempt to facilitate some solution to the drainage problem. Please feel free to contact this office or our engineering division if you have any questions regarding the proposed construction of a wet well by the builders and three (3) property owners. Sincerely, cwomak4r~4- Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator /1 cc: Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation J!I Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Lar4z , g r7 Jack Moffat Dale Gustafson r°_.txtnJr:,~t., ~;~~.t r THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY ti - city of pagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH May 28, 1986 VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members MR ED DANNECKER c~ ad inisttrrattorS 4154 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city clerk EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Lots 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block 7, Hilltop Estates Backyard Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Dannecker: I am in receipt of your letter of May 13 wherein you identified problems associated with draining the rear yard areas of the above-referenced lots. In researching our files, I have found that this problem has previously been identified prior to construction of the houses on Lots 14 and 15 with a recommended solution being prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., on September 22, 1983, which is enclosed for your information. On April 28 of this year, our Chief Building Official, Mr. Dale Peterson, responded to similar concern raised by Mr. Steve Reed, of 4150 Blueberry Circle (Lot 7.Fr). A copy of that letter is also enclosed for your information.11i The existing low area along these common lot lines was not a major drainage concern in consideration of developing the overall subdivision, Hilltop Estates. Several similar type drainage situations are usually resolved through proper site planning and yard landscaping by the individual builders of each lot. Unfortunately, when Lot 16 was developed, the walkout elevation of that house was placed too low to allow adequate fill to be placed in the downstream lots (14 and 15) to ensure minimum surface flow out to Blueberry Circle. After inspecting the site during the early morning hours of May 21, I do not feel you will have a severe problem. However, the only way to be totally sure would be the installation of a gravity storm sewer system as referenced in your letter. However, with no other storm sewer facilities in the immediate vicinity, this type of installation would involve considerable expense ($10,000 The financing of similar type public improvements is usually achieved through special assessments against benefitted properties. In this case, they would be the five lots referenced above. In order for the Council to consider the expenditure of dollars and the subsequent assessment to private property or expenditure of public funds to finance this project, it would require the petition of at THE LONE _OAK TREE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR ED DANNECKER MAY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 least two of the five property owners to initiate a feasibility report. Upon completion of this report, a formal public hearing would be held at which time the Council would hope that more than 51% of the affected property owners would support such a project. In order to initiate this process, I have enclosed a copy of the City's standard petition form which must be submitted to the Council before any formal study can be initiated beyond what has been performed to date by the developer's engineer. Until there has been sufficient support for this public improvement, the resolution of this problem remains one to be resolved between the affected property owners, their builders and/or developer. Sincerely, homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj CC. Dale Peterson, Chief Building Official Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation Jim Hill, James R. Hill, Inc. Enclosure Mr. Thomas Colbert 5-13-66 Eagan City Offices 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55123 Dear Mr. Colbert, I currently have excess ponding of rainwater at the rear of my lot. The water is runoff from.a number of adjacent lots which has resulted in significant accumulation. The size of the pond is approximately 70 by 20 by 3 feet deep. I have a number of concerns about the ponding.` 1)Foremost is safety. There are many children in the neighborhood. The pond poses a high potential of an accidental drowning. On one occurance earlier this year, a 7 year old boy became stuck in the pond because of the suction of the mud and required assistance to get out. 2)Towards the end of April,a second pond developed posing a threat to my home and my neighbors. The water levels are such that water could enter through the basement level windows. ti 3)A storm pipe was installed to drain water from the ponding area to the street. The elevation of the pipe is such that it is ineffective. I am conviced that my back yard will be submersed before the pipe would be utilized. There needs to be an arrangement to allow for proper drainage. I understand there are two alternate grading plans on file, neither of which have been implemented at this time. I do not have confidence that either of the plans will provide a total,long lasting solution. I request the city of Eagan conduct a feasibility study on the placement of a storm sewer in the area of the ponding to resolve the problem. There are a number of factors that limit the number of alternatives. The storm sewer will provide the best results. A prompt response from the city may be necessary to prevent damage from flooding. Sincerely, CC: Dan Osborn _~~(~DtGcL.._ Steve Reed Ed Dannecker 4154 Blueberry Circle Phone W-921-1851 H-452-975Y cRV of pagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk April 28, 1986 MR'STEVE REED 4150 BLUEBERRY CIR EAGAN, MN 55123 RE: DRAINAGE OF L 14, 15 & 16, B 7, HILLTOP ESTATES Dear Mr. Reed: In response to your phone call of April 189 wherein you indicated at that time you did not want water standing on your -property nor did you want any trees removed for filling, I am enclosing a copy of the transmittal from the Engineer, Mr. James Hill, to the developers of Hilltop Estates, Sienna Corporation, with proposed solutions to the drainage problem of the above lots. The proposed solutions to the drainage concerns were discussed with you at the time construction was started on your home in September of 1984. At that time, Sunshine Construction and you agreed to fill the rear yards and in place j of the drainage swale use a buried drainage pipe which was done. If presently you do not want the rear yard filled and the trees removed, you have two alternatives left - the proposed wet well or ponding in your rear yard. ' Sincerely, Dale S. Peterson Chief Building Official DSP/js CC: Craig Knudsen - City Engineering Technician Sienna Corporation Sunshine Construction THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY zls--d7 a JaMes K. Hill t October 6, 1983 Mr. Dale Peterson Building Inspector 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES Dear Mr. Peterson: At the request of Sienna Corporation, we have taken field elevations on Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 7 to determine existing conditions for the purpose of suggesting methods of draining the rear yards of said lots. We have attached a plan with elevations and suggestions for your review and for assistance to the builder when constructing homes on Lots 14 and 15. You will note that the existing rear yard grade of the home on Lot 16 is 892.6 which,along with the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15, should drain to the curb on Blueberry Circle which is at an elevation of 891.9. Two methods are available: One: Fill the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 so that a drainage swale can be maintained from Lot 16 thru Lot 15 and then to the street. This will require up to six feet of fill in the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 and some filling on Lot 16; the Swale will only be a 0.3'+ percent grade a because of the existing house grade on Lot 16. The drainage swale shown across the corner of Lot 14 and thru Lot 15 will have to be provided with an easement. Two: A second method for drainage would be to not fill the rear yards, let water pond, provide for an emergency overflow Swale as shown on the attached drawings, and construct a "wet well" that may or may not slowly drain the ponding area. One or two soil borings should be required to determine if and at what depth a sandy stratum can be found. The effectiveness of the "wet well will depend on the type of soil, perkolation, and mainte- nance. f ^.~x t-~•~- i •4.~,•. ,,fit'^tr~~. `1 .=r i _ ..i.lL.. _ .fit. - ^..%1 ~/t .~...t. I( a 8200 HU,\1BOLDT AVENUE SOUTH • BLOGNAINGTON • ;\IINNESOTA • 35431 • 612-884-3029 .~.~w,.~..-~._:~._...__,:_~.<.....:-;~....,~..._,_ a ~r~a• _ _ '4i`TM'--~ r . ~*-ye~F'*r.CwwewY rtwgMR~1~!^t`1F ^.H °+4'+..^w.'ian^.*w +TF wT~:w~'!I.IT`+w^'Y'C►'f l~!'M^~PYVer..~l+w*XTTY!.?^w~°-a.i ~(+t'Jl~:av. -i"...tv. aY.t:..J...::..u:+n~~:,su.~4J:ilw.•1-a::.i.rwa rr.«~::c:i:,~w4::-+~i.Y'. J.. - '"n.:AU.r..nrw..dlra 's• -aL4s.+=.",~vir..w-r.w-.. v. rra"wtC»..~ Mr. Dale Peterson RE: LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 7 s HILLTOP ESTATES October 6, 1983 page 2 i The emergency swale must be constructed and maintained so that homes are not flooded. The swale must have an easement across Lot 14. In either method, Lot 15 must provide for (in deed) drainage of adjacent lots. } Sincerely, JAMES R. HILL, INC. James R. Hill JRH/sh Enclosure cc: Sienna Bob Rosene Loren Spande i 1 t James R. Hill inc. z"+!r~ a. •a~t'af+s r+y►•_.. ;a~r ..sX.`*r.."',tG.?'<i!`^it~^ z;' ns. n --•1.,. ,.►cw _-w -w raa +wv:. ui u. « s. _ a > a ' " Fyn _ - . . ..._-...:gr.~ .:n`v4a.i--L ~Y. "v J J;.:.."; 31. dP DILL 8200 Humboldt AvE So. ~ Z + Qloomington. MN 55437 _-9 S00H~' '~IV11S1~ m ~ sd a' t6q 7 A-its I y ~ ~ ~1~1 068 jr u o 0,W t / C•o~8 8~ /f .ril8 p't~8 ~ ~~rt`$ .6s 3 { { b'S68 Ml ro a'ba Of Zlb 6•h 6$ S.i6$ ,r hSda of auk ~_Tq m ,,.~~~v~d►~~( ~9 C ~~o~ 4 ,c 98,7 Xg9co,Z ~L ~/~G!- 7J 7 Ile- / i ~ e 9 3 N ~ ~ ~l-Gf ~r.~,.Cj%ysJ 7-fs.~-7' .:/E7" ~r/EGZ- 7 .3 SRS g9y,9 ~ilcv Pd ~ ,7 ~ ~ µ)ELV I ,a Bts.9 brl tw~lC..F , I~99s•2 I Rb ~ Y B e'. biS•~ BP7a- w9 610.7 ' Lp Pf2 C = 7 A r ~ nl C. °USF I-C ~~~v~v r1141 y r ~ ' R. M LL. ildt;, 8200 ! lumboldt Ave Su ~,a x 9co, ~ 965 ©loornr,, MN 891 I ~ A~ gy,,S 8y~,9 gi2.3 ~ 1 I`I a ls7,7. I~ t5~ ~d f•o ~p T)f N J'1 4 r~ ~rQ x 99x1 ~~iLl • + QAI.r. t~ = ~0 sr l•9 P 811 f s ---gL.UlLr too' L&Vi GQ /J / ey'? vC +aa~ y Bff,9 tt,G UJ0 L /~'I G.+ S ~ D Po5 ob ~ 1 F a 4x 990r 7 y f~, ~ NSF T ~ rd OF- d'"'a-6 4FZZV cross ~'A~~rVG /Q k'4 ~L • • r~D2 S~:tJ~4~L~:. i i ~ /~J py~17~~0 f~11 L~1X3l!/..-~ Cog ~ ~ ~ bM ~N ssbb "~IVI1S1 ~ 9S~g 0m7'7~g 67~A ~h 6g ice. 7 1~5 _~1 I ~°~Vxj ~~1~~ ~•o6B ~ 0 21g ',1`Ytp a4~- ~ °'t~Br b 6~ 1'1 B d l7n Ls'~o) f V,.i •~Bg C 6 Sig ~•Zib 6•h66 ~,•ib8 ,Y tELS r'7 S Z8X C96 NW 'uol6,rluwool9 o) 6 x (j? pie za V • ~r aim r7:7.a~~ 1..~~ ✓li , --7 r?~ L? CO 0,-/;, 'Ile d? X-T 'Z~(13 b ?Alp /y 1j' od~Br 0{~ G•otd 9~~Bv ,ot{8` ~•i~! ~arttg 7t9t Q grA r a1 ti',B ~ 6 see 71 ~ S C W72 m I` y h 16B rA p x mah ~A%4 lplocltwnl.{ COZY t times R. Hill, inc.. PLANNERS/ ENGINEERS J SURVEYORS' " July 21, 1`986 RtrCl:tUED J i1 t. 2 no 19$6 Mr. Rodney D. Hardy Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive Suite 608 Minneapolis, MN 55435 RE: HILLTOP ESTATES LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCK 7 DRAINAGE CONCERNS Dear Mr. Hardy; At your request, we have reviewed the recent soils report by GME and our field notes taken in June of 1986. Based on this information, we feel there are`""four alternatives to reduce the drainage problem within the rear of lots 14, 15 and 16 1.) Fill the low lying area to 'a suitable elevation such that the runoff flows to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the existing vegetation. This alternative was pre- viously proposed in our letter of October 6, 1983 to Dale Peterson, City Building Inspector. 2.) Fill the low lying area within lot 15 only to a suitable elevation such that the runoff flows into the 12" P.V.C. installed by the builder. The fill required would range between 0.5' to 1.5' deep. This would require a minimal amount of disruption to the existing vegetation. Also, a wet well would be required at the outle,t_ of the pipe in the front yard of lot 14. Per the soils report, a wet well can be constructed in the area of the outlet. As a backup to the wet we"ll,,a provision should be included to discharge additional water to Blueberry Circle. See "attached for schedule of estimated construction costs. 3.) Construct a catch basin and sump, pump system near the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. The surface water would drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would-be activated to pump the wager via the existing 'drain pipe. A wet well as described in alternative #2, would also be required` in the front yard of lot 14. See attached 8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH • BLOOMINGTON • MINNESOTA • 55431 • 612-884-3029 schedule for estimated construction costs. The issues to be resolved with '.this solution are as follows. 1) ownership and maintenance costs of pump? 2) variation of weather' conditions - the pump ;must be removed during the winter season. (pump wt. 110 lbs) 3) the pump must be wired to a house who pays electrical costs? or how shared? 4) what happens if electricity goes out? 4.) Install a catch basin in the low lying area and run the storm sewer line into the existing city storm sewer system under a public improvement project. See attached plan and schedule of costs. Given the four alternatives, we would recommend alter- native number 4 as the best solution to the drainage concern. However because of the high cost to each of the three benefitting lots, we feel that alternative number 2 would be the next best. Within all of the alternatives, ponding may still occur depending on the duration and intensity of a storm. This is because the drain pipe or sewer system can only handle so much water at a given time. Also, there is only approximately 1.5'+ from the low lying area to the walkout elevation of lot 16 before flooding would' occur. If you have any questions or require further information with regard to this matte, please advise. Sincerely,' JAMES R. HILL, INC. Qte A. Bishop, .E. Vice President cc: Tom Colbert - City, of Eagan Dale Peterson - City of Eagan Attachments Y Jame's R. Hill, inc. HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 2 Estimated Construction Costs _Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum' 600.00 a (off site disposal) Barrow material 80 cu.yd. @ 5.00/cu.yd. 400.00 to fill hole Restoration - Sodding 220 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 440.00 Construct 'Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00 on Lot 14 - aaxz~raaaa~- $2,640.00 + 10% Contingencies 260.00 aass~ra~sssas~ Total Estimated Construction Costs - $2,900.00 armies R. Hill, inc. 6 HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 3 Estimated Construction Costs Catch Basin Sump Lump Sum $ 1,125.00 (with discharge pipe) Pump &'High 'Level Lump Sum 3,610.00 Controls (See attached details) Electrical Wiring Lump Sum 425.00 Restoration Sodding 150 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 300.00 Construct Wet Well Lump Sum .1,200.00 on Lot 14 $ 6,660.00 + 10% Contingencies 660.00 Total Estimated $ 7,720.00 Construction Costs James R. Hill, inc. HILLTOP ESTATES 13 12 14 ' SPROP EE OS ED C.B. DETAIL 15 16 NO SCALE Qh R~r . c IQ s17 BEEHIVE CASTING' ,~-,ELECTRICAL CONNECTION ' --DISCHARGE LINE TO EXISTING 12" DRAIN PIPE SUMP PUMP PROPOSED CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE NO. 3' HILLTOP ESTATES Alternative No. 4 1 The third alternative*as mentioned in the'GME Consultants, Inc. report dated June 27, 1986 is to petition the City of Eagan for a storm sewer system to terminate with a catch basin being installed in the rear yard area between Lot 14 and 15. The nearest storm sewer exists at the intersection of Diffley Road and'Blueberrp Lane which would require approximately 640 L.F. of pipe and 3 structures together with street, boulevard, and driveway restoration. (See Attached) The estimated total cost for this storm sewer `system is approximately $28,168.00 based on the following estimated quantities. 12" R.C.P. CLS 640 L.F. @ 23.00/L.F. $14,720.00 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD, MANHOLE 2 EA. @ 800.00 EA. 1,600.00 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD CATCH 1 EA. @`850.00 EA. 850.00 BASIN RESTORATION OF 525 S.Y. @ 2.00/S.Y. 1,050.00 BOULEVARDS STREET RESTORATION LUMP SUM- 1,000.00 DRIVEWAY RESTORATION 3 EA. @ 300.00 EA 900.00 $20,120.00 10% Contingencies 2,012.00 + 30% City Engineering & 6,036.00 Administrative Costs Total Estimated Costs $28,168.00 Cost Per Lot $ 9,389.00 (assuming 3 benefitting lots) Cost Per Lot $ 5,633.00 (assuming S_benefitting lots) Jameers. R. Hill, inc. z4' 40 ~ cD m b`Of ~u O 1`y/ vL~ ~S ~69e' ~)o ~ • 469478350,49' h 1-2283 9 9LvF 8~e~ 5° ..E . :M1 "N1 3 ? 1~ • w7b`•`O - OR8'j.. (A 40..N 49.71 0 7 N Po O N7. UR'"(p 7 M, . ?fl=16°29'29" m go.Z G ° _ C fl o~ ai i N v p.B3 69 `o ro Fr 8 0.130'g0 Z }Z474 bits. 4 'lampR~"56p9 p a Z 3°\ y, t~ x36` 20 to To . .0 1 o`'~g ,h9 34 _ N rO,~~ a 11 a W RRY N w -111.67 BE ~ w BLUE Oc~~06~ a' 6 °240g'p N 090 N M' } 3= I~a1'17'~0 2'a . 60 °0o 'L p 2 2 $ a i, W t7 o 10 s t92 63 OKNpLL- CM a ) eft b~ _.124.01 7--- ~s ~ j :girl j ~00 • /S~ !v' S 89022'53'E' 98.38 r • 00 Qti w s N 4_93°5720 a' ~~9 N o~ v M N of <r 1? .w 4, ry 2 o Q: ; m 13 o M 12 t'es OCR) 161. a z z 00 446' Nyu2 ~l0 180.fl0 . L205.75 S87°37'37"E _ p 2 S3 F a - S83 4107.~ - dr C~ in m O N E i 115.75 90.00 - >233 o(o 3839 , j 3©N N 14 _c4 ` GlT~~ 1 hAs~ c 3s 2 19 aoj /.w 1° 3o p O (RM~ o I 20 16 .p''9' SQ.~sc / tl OO S . 0 O~ o a t sti.l.25p0 tow X532 F; X92 !3, =nj~ Ne 64 7 2 p 2 pp o`ro • ..I Afo /a O• OD 000 °>4e~ ~?i~h dj~^~~ ~ O,\ O >;5 o co o / C/~ ~3~. , ~.rL~ ¢ ~tk ,2$ z . CY A' 99 r "7 ? Q QS 00 C 8 ` \ G } 1 ~ 0'31 i 21 Ssg°p o• 96.0 ~ v `y 52.94 f.- G 0 3,vs•~ Q'~°33'20" a 91 6000 f ~J2. ? I -40 A 22n % O J ,0 22 oQ 1' STO°4 ~0 N o CVO It m 1 to d • 72 _ G - S89 30 20 E. 0 * - _ •s. ° fi oA ~t M 80 118.91 2 0 oP ry~ -N N % e %o 2 c Q'r c ti it N ro O 3 ~ W - _ 'ti ~ C~, ~ o i Q ~ _ _ to N y h O: t> o v' N ^7 r 2CD U. C 99 0 - -..0 7 to : Q w I !in o 0; ~ to v 23 8, z a 4 ~O 22 0 : 0 co ' _ 130. 0- 30 - - • - 179.63 199.28 101 12_ - W EXiSt1N~.C.ATC.b~I B!!S•)N~ i NO. 30 r g _ 509.75 C iZ. F: Ii 6 0 _ r rn SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS` 1 R0 3'OGJ£D s~'0 P m E:;PF- k' GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS i 2083 East Center Circle / Minneapolis. MN 55441 1 612/559-1859 -l June 27, 1986 f Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive, ;Suite 608 Edina, Minnesota 55435 Attention: Mr. Rod Hardy GME Project No. 1073 RE: Subsurface exploration for proposed `back yard drainage area at Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 7`of Hilltop Estates in Eagan, Minnesota I Gentlemen: As authorized by you on June 11, 1986, we have completed this l subsurface exploration for the proposed back yard drainage area. Enclosed please find the results of our exploration and the soil report- which we have prepared. Two copies of this 'report have been sent to the above address. Two copies have been sent to Mr. Harold<Bohanon of James R. Hill, Inc. INTRODUCTION Single family dwellings have recently been constructed at the three subject lots in the Hilltop Estates Subdivision. Groundwater has been observed ponded on the surface in the rear yards these lots during recent rainy periods. It is also our understanding that prior to the development of the subdivision, this area was a naturally-occurring drainage swale and ponding area. In an attempt to eliminate the water from ponding on the surface, a storm drain about 12 inches in diameter was installed 1 from the rear yard area near the property line dividing Lots 14 J GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS WILLIAM C. KWASNY; P.E. THOMAS P. VENEMA, P.E. WILLIAM E. BLOEMENDAL, E.I.T. Mr. Rod Hardy 2 June 27, 1986 and 15. This drain daylights in the front yard area of Lot 14. Due to the existing topography, this drain was not capable of dewatering- the area. It is now proposed to undertake remedial measures which would reduce or eliminate water ponding, on the surface. The purpose of this report is'to describe the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration;` to review and evaluate these conditions with respect to the proposed project; and to present recommendations for feasible' methods of reducing the possibility of water ponding on the surfaces of the rear yards. FIELD EXPLORATION/LABORATORY TESTING Two borings were drilled for this project as shown on the enclosed Soil Boring Location Diagram. The number and locations of the - borings were chosen by GME Consultants, Inc. and James R. Hill, Inc. during a site meeting on June 9, 1986. The borings were laid out in the field by the GME drill crew. Ground surface elevations J at the borings were determined by GME, referenced to the elevation of the invert of the existing drain. The elevations of the borings are shown at the top of the respective logs`(NVGD Datum). The borings were drilled with a Mobile B-24 rig. Solid stem augers were used to advance the borings full depth. The soil samples were obtained by the split barrel in accordance with ASTM: D 1586.; During sampling, the Standard Penetration Values _l 6ME CONSULTANTS, INC, Mr. Rod Hardy 3 June 27, 1986 (N-values, blows per foot) were recorded. These N-values are shown on the respectiveboring logs.` The recovered soil samples were preliminarily classified in the field, sealed in glass jars to `prevent moisture loss, and returned to our laboratory for examination and classification by a Soil Engineer. Groundwater levels were noted in the borings during and after completion of the field operations. These water ;levels are shown on the respective togs. A discussion of the groundwater w~ conditions found in the borings is included under the Site 1 Conditions section of this report. :l The laboratory testing program consisted of a Soil Engineer examining each `sample to determine the major and minor soil { components, while also noting the color, degree of saturation, and ^l any lenses or 'seams found in the samples. The soils were visually/manually classified on the basis of texture and J plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The letter symbol in parentheses following the written description on the logs is the estimated group symbol _i based on the USCS. A chart describing the properties of the groups under this system is included in the Appendix of this report. _l The Engineer grouped the soils by type into the strata shown on y~ the logs. The stratification lines shown on the logs are approximate; insitu, the transition between soil types may be gradual or abrupt in both the horizontal and vertical directions. J 8ME CONSULTANTS. INC. l' Mr. Rod, Hardy 4 June 27, 1986 Particle size analysis of soils representative of the -most granular soil strata observed in each of the borings were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM: D 422. As a part' of the testing program, laboratory moisture contents were determined in accordance with ASTM: D 2216. The laboratory moisture content results are shown on the appropriate boring logs and on the sieve analysis sheets Groundwater levels- were noted inthe borings during and after completion of the drilling operations. The recorded water levels are shown in the lower deft corner of the respective boring logs. 1 A discussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings in included under the Site Conditions section of this report. We will retain the soil samples remaining aftertesting for 30 days after the date of this report. If you wish to have the samples retained beyond this time, we ask that you please advise _ I us; otherwise the samples will be discarded. J SITE CONDITIONS Topography/Surface Features The ponding area generally runs in a southwest to northeast direction from the center of Lot 16 to the rear of Lot 14- The' topography of this area varies from a high elevation of approximately 893 feet to 894 feet adjacent to the rear of the houses, to a low of approximately 889 feet near the property line 1 dividing Lots 14 and 15. This area is covered with dense _ } OME CONSULTANTS, INC. I Mr Rod Hardy 5 June 27, 1986 vegetation varying from brush to large mature trees. Boring 1 was drilled in the localYing ream yard area. The inlet of an approximately 12 inch diameter drain pipe is located in the rear yard area. The drain runs in a generally noresterly direction towards Blueberry Circle and then in a nnv_,4 %Wy direction to the front yard area of Lot 14 near the intersection of Blueberry Circle and Blueberry Lane. Boring 2 was i drilled near the outfall of the drain. The vegetation in this ~l immediate area is sparse and includes-low grasses. Soil Conditions The soil conditions found in the 'borings are shown on the respective logs The soil conditions vary at the two boring locations. At boring 1 the surface is covered' with approximately 2.5 of dark brown silty fine to medium sand and clayey' sand fill. The fill contains trace roots and seams of black fine sandy silt. Underlying the J fill and extending to the termination depth of the boring at 20 feet, occur highly stratified soils. These stratified soils include clayey silt, sandy silt, clayey sands, silty sand, and sandy clay.' The observed seams-or lenses vary in thickness from 1 less than 0-.5 feet to nearly 7 feet in thickness. The N-values within the naturally-occurring non-organic soils at boring 1 varied from 2 to 43 blows per foot, generally increasing with depth. The N-values indicate that these soils increased from soft -I F~ GME CONSULTANTS. INC. 1 Mr. Rod Hardy 6 June 27, 1986 or loose at shallow dePthe to dense or hard at greater depth. r, Based on visual observations in the laboratory, particle size analysis testing were run-on the two predominant granular soil types for use in estimation of the permeability of these soils. The percent passing the #200, sieve, which is the division between coarse and fine graine& soils, vary from approximately 29% to 34%. ^I The moisture content of these `same samples varied from approximately 15% to 17%. .1 At boring 2, the soils were slightly less stratified. At that _t location, the upper most approximately 7 feet consisted of black and dark brown stratified silty fine to coarse sand and sandy silt with trace organic content. This upper most 7 feet is ` probably fill. Below'a depth of 7 feet, the predominant soil type was fine to coarse sand and silty sand with layers of sandy silt. The Standard Penetration Test Resistancies within the naturally- occurring sandy soils varied from 6 to 24 blows per foot indicative of a loose to medium dense condition. Based on laboratory particle size analysis tests, the silt and clay content of the sandy soils at this site varied from approximately 6% to 18%. Thus, the_ granular soils at boring 2 contain less fines (particles smaller than the #200 sieve) than those soils en ountered at boring 1. SME CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 7 June 27, 1986 - Groundwater Conditions Free` groundwater was encountered in each of the two borings during our relatively brief period of observation. At boring' 1, the groundwater was observed at a depth of 2 feet while drilling. At the conclusion of drilling, the water was at 3 feet from the- surface. At boring 2, located in the front yard area, minor seepage was observed at a depth of 9 feet while drilling. The borehole was dry upon completion of the drilling and approximately 2 hours later. Laboratory soil moisture content tests results varied from approximately 15% to 17% at boring 1, and from approximately 3% to 9% at boring 2. - Based on the available data, it can be seen that the groundwater is at shallower depths and the soils in a wetter condition at boring 1 than at boring 2. _.l The groundwater levels will vary seasonally and annually, depending upon local amounts of precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff, infiltration, and for other reasons. Excavations -f extending just a few feet below the existing ground surface in the J rear yard area would likely encounter groundwater infiltration. } The quantity of such infiltration would likely be substantial. } Excavation near the out fall of the existing drain pipe would _ encounter less groundwater. J - 6NIE CONSULTANTS. INC. Mr Rod Hardy 8 June 27, 1986 - REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS - We understand that the site becomes ponded with water during times 1 of heavy rainfall. A preliminary proposal was presented by others, to reduce or eliminate the ponding of surface water in this area was to install a "wet well." Briefly described, a wet well includes an excavation at the site, to be backfilled with highly permeable granular soils. The surface water would infiltrate the granular soils and would then be dispersed into the natural soils. Thus, the surface waters would be allowed to discharge into the soils at depth. The soil and groundwater conditions at this site, do not appear to be suitable-for construction of a wet well. Suitable naturally- occurring-conditions would include highly permeable granular soils and a groundwater° level at substantial depth. The soils at boring 1 in the rear yards are stratified and include highly impermeable layers of silt, clay, and silty and clayey sands. J Laboratory sieve analysis test results for the granular soils indicate the inclusion of approximately 30% or more silt and clay. We estimate that the permeability of the granular soils at that location to be approximately 1 x 10 -6 cmjsec'or less. For a design of a wet well, it is also beneficial to have a groundwater table which is -relatively deep. At this site, the groundwater was encountered at a very shallow depth on the order J of 2 feet. Such a high existing groundwater table would cause a R~ mounding condition with the introduction of water from a wet well. F~ GM@ CONSULTANTS. INC. i Mr. Rod Hardy 9 June 27, 1986 That is, as new water were introduced through the wet well, rather f than being quickly dispersed laterally into the existing soils, a rise in the groundwater (mounding) would occur which would take extended periods of time to disperse. This wuld effectively reduce or eliminate infiltration. The soil conditions at the outfall of the existing drain in the front yard of Lot 14, are somewhat better suited for construction of a wet well. The granular soils at that location contain less silt and clay content, on the order of 18% at a depth of 6 to 12 feet and approximately 6% between the depths of 16 feet and 20 J feet. The deeper sand stratum would be suitable for the design of a wet well. However, these 'soils are at substantial depth and wet well construction could be costly. Also, groundwater infiltration was encountered at a depth of 9 feet at this location. This relatively shallow groundwater table would reduce the efficiency: of the wet well J We recommend that the proposed wet well not be built in the rear yard area. It is our opinion that three alternatives exist to the proposed wet well. The alternatives may not be as satisfactory from an asthetic and economic' perspective that the originally proposed wet well. Alternate No. 1 would be to fill the lowlYin9 area to a suitable ~ elevation such that runoff occurs by flow to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the vegetation _J that currently occupies the rear yard. It would be possible to J - GME CONSULTANTS. INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 10 June 27, 1986 replant this area after the earthwork is completed. As a part of filling the rear yard area to promote surface drainage, it would be advantageous to partially grade the site to drain to the existing buried drain pipe at which point it would flow to the front yard of Lot 14 where a wet well could be constructed. A properly designed and constructed wet well in this area could be feasible: If filling and replanting the rear yard area are not possible, as a second alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard so that the surface water drains to a location near the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. At that location, a catch basin and sump pump would be installed. The surface water would drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would be activated and pump the water via the existing drain pipe to a wet well constructed at the out fall of the drain. As a backup to the wet well in the front yard, an overflow mechanism should be included to discharge additional water to the Blueberry Circle stormsewer system. As a third, possibly more expensive alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard to drain to a catch basin in the rear yard as discussed in Alternate No. 2. For this alternative, rather than a sump pump removing the water, the water could be drained by gravity to a suitable discharge location. However, due to the existing topography of the area, the most suitable discharge location would likely be at some distance away, probably J GME CONSULTANTS. INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 11 June 27, 1986 at Diffley Road, or to an existing storm sewer system also at some distance away. This drain system would have to cross at least 2 existing streets. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS This preliminary report has been prepared based on the soil and J groundwater conditions found in our subsurface exploration, and on the preliminary data related to us by James R Hill, Inc. This report is intended solely for this project at the specific location discussed. r, The soil and groundwater conditions were determined at 2 boring locations.These conditions are pertinent only at the boring locations and under the environment existing at the time of our J subsurface exploration. Variations in soil* and groundwater conditions were encountered and additional variations probably. exist that would not become apparent until construction starts. j No warranty, either expressed or implied, is presented in this J report with respect to the soil and groundwater conditions on this site. It is not warranted to extrapolate soil conditions between the boring locations themselves We would be pleased to supply, additional geotechnical l recommendations at which time a specific design is considered. We rl appreciate the opportunity' to be of service to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to J GME CONSULTANTS, INC. - 1Mr. Rod Hardy 12 June 27, 1986 contact us. Sincerely, GME CONSULTANTS, INC. !~U DI Will' m D. Plate, P.E. Pro' t Eng. eer J ILlliam C. Kw J rincipal Engi APPENDIX Soil Boring Location Diagram General Notes Soil Boring Logs Sieve Analysis Results Unified Soil Classification Chart WDP:WCK:kdk ,v J I hereb ce=ksprepa that plan, specification, or re wby me or under my direr supervisio and that I am a duly ReqWULrad o e ional Engineer under the law • of Minnesota. J Z w Date Acv o J J JJ J 6NIE CONSULTANTS. MC. r l) 8/~ 6Cr 1 I B-. 890.7' ; 1~t ~ L r B-1 Y a ks l1, , sue` y ~I r l 4 16 i APPROXIMATE SCALE ~I 0' 25' 50' I SOIL BORING LOCATION' DIAGRAM GME CONSULTANTS, INC. I LOTS 14, 15 & 16; BLOCK 7 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE HILLTOP ESTATES MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 EAGAN, MINNESOTA WDP WCK 1073 6-20-86 ~I SIENNA CORPORATION GENERAL NINES DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SL SS with Liner SS Split ScSoon f l/8" I.D., 2" O.D.; unless OS : Osterberg Sampler - 3" Shelby Tube otherwise noted HS Hollow Stem Auger ST Shelby Tube - 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted WS' : Wash Sample PA : Power Auger FT : Fish Trail DB Diamond Bit - NX: BX: AX RB ' : Rock Bit AS Auger Sample SS : Bulk Sample JS Jar Sample PM : Pressuremeter test- in situ VS Vane Shear Standard "N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon, except ! where noted. ! WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL Water Level WCI : Wet Cave In r DCI Dry Cave In WS : While Sampling WD While Drilling SCR : Before Casing Removal ACR : After Casing Removal AS : After Boring Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the ' indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence of ground water elevations must be sought. GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY: I Coarse Grained or Granular Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are described as: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. FineGrained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are 'described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and silts if they are non-cohesive. In addition to gradation, granular soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place density and fine grained sails on the basis of their strength or consistency, and their plasticity. ' Major Descriptive Termis) Component (Of Components Also Percent of Of Sample Size Range Present in Sample) Dry Weight Boulders Over 8 in. (200mm) Trace 1-9 Cobbles 8 in. to 3'in. Little 10 - 19 (200mm to 75mm) Gravel 3 in. to #4 sieve Some 20 - 34 (75mm to 2mm) Sand #4 to #200 sieve And 35 - 50 12mm to.074mm) Silt Passing #200 sieve 1 10.074mm to 0.005mm) J Clay Smaller than 0.005mm CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS: RELATIVE DENSITY DF GRANULAR SOILS: Unconfined Comp. Strength, Ou, tsf Consistency N - Blows/ft.. Relative Density < 0.25 Very Soft O-3 Very Loose 0.25-0.49 Soft 4-9 Loose 0.50-029 Medium {Firm) 10 - 29 Medium Dense 1.00-1.99 Stiff 30 - 4P Dense 2.00-3.99 Very Stiff 50 - 80 Very Dense 4.00-8.00 Hard 80+ Extremely Dense >8.00 Very Hard_ GME CONS1:tTR,i US, IN3C- T__ _ LOG OF BORING 1 PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 SITE Blueberry Lane Hilltop Estates Eagan'. Minnesota - OWNER ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Sienna or tions James R. Hill Inc`. UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT 2 W LL LL CO 2 3 4 5 m J z DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WATER w w w _ w co CONTENT % W zw _j v Iu' W CL V) ii W F- Q _ STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT) Q U Q W ¢ z Q cc W SURFACE ELEVATION a CO . -0_ o Cn d 3.rn : 890.2 feet in cc Z11 10 20 30 40 50 Dar brown silty ine to me ium iss sand, and clayey sand, trace roots, 2 0 1 2.5 gravel; trace seams black fine 2SS sandy silt very loose - wet - 2 4 Brown clayey silt, trace fine sand - 8 • 3SS 66 ft - wet - M Red-brown clayey fine to coarse sand I 4SS' 7.5' race ravel - loose wet SC 6 Gray very fine sandy silt, trace 1 5SS Repats - firm - wet - (141) d-brown clayey fine to medium sand 14 Ito sand clay - loose - wet SC-C • 6SS Gray-brown and red-brown stratified 28 clayey fine to medium sand and silty sand, trace gravel; seams sandy 14' clay - loose to medium dense - wet- SC-SM• seams CL 7SS 16' Brown and yellow-.brown silty fine 23 to medium sand to sandy silt, trace 8SS Vlay, gravel - dense - moist - 34 SM-ML 9SS Dark gray fine to coarse sandy clay 43 and sandy silt, trace gravel - very stiff to hard wet CL-ML End of Boring at 20 feet Solid Stem Auger used full depth ! Borehole backfilled with cuttings 1 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED - - W.L. SZ 2 feet While Drilling GMECONSULTANTS, INC. BORING COMPLETED - - W.L. Z feet After Dri 11 i 2M EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG, DRILLER RDK_ W.L. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN W OP APPROVED W K J # 1073 SHEET 1 of 2 J The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual. LOG OF BORING 2 ; PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 SITE Blueberry Lane Hilltop Estates Faga-n-,-Min Pqota ARCHITECT-ENGINEER 1 OWNER Sienna Corporations James R.. Hill, Inc. I-- UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT. 1 2 3 4 5 LL LL W t7 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL 3 WATER W > 2 ~ co ° m CONTENT °!e W z wa _j U ~n w 1 ~ a H w H Q STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT) Q U~ Q W a z ¢ II-- SURFACE ELEVATION W Q a co : 890.7 feet V) CC z 10 20 0 40 so Yellow-brown silty fine to coarse iSS sand, trace gravel - loose moist- 5 SM - fill 2SS Black and dark brown stratified 11 silty fine to coarse sand and sandy 3SS silt, trace clay, gravel, wood, 4 roots, slightly organic - soft to \ _ 71 stiff (SM-ML-OL) - probable fill 4SS Yellow - brown fine to coarse sand, 9 ' 19 5SS trace silt, gravel, clay loose 6 to medium dense moist to wet 04 (SP - SM) 6SS 13 Brown fine to medium sandy silt, trace gravel very stiff - moist 7SS 15' ML 211 16' Red-brown silty fine to coarse sand, trace gravel - medium dense - 8SS (SW-SP) 16 G Red-brown fine to coarse sand, trace silt, gravel - medium dense- 9SS moist (SW-SP) 241 [a End of Boring at 20 feet Hollow Stem Auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttings 3 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED _ -1 - W.L. Seepage e at 9nfeet GME CONSULTANTS, T NC. RB GRING c B 2 E ED 6-13-86 W ,L. While DRILLER RDK 1W.L.. Dr After Drilling MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN WDP APPROVED WCK J # 1073 SHEET - 2 of 2 The stratification tines represent approximate boundaries between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual. r r r 00 = r- cn c r M U. S. Standard Sieve Ownin3s in Inds W. S. Standard sieve "umbels Hydrometer m r- C/1 G 3 Y 1♦I l ! 11 3 4 6 6 10 14 16 20 30 40 SO 60'0 iC0 `140 200 210 CC) --4 M l0A' 0 v c a i m r-+ r 90 10 r- cr1 -e z~QorN-t m tmil P ~ Vf so 20 GO 70 , r 30 C) ♦T/ y m 40 60 3 -4 0 3 50 50 c i2 40 60 a 30 TO I 10 20 7C 3 S 0 100 100 so 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 G' O =7 rAN Size in Millimeters SILT or CLAY Z c ic RAVEL myg°i T Coarse Fine Coarse M.d1t•r Fine c-1 0 A, rA C/3 ~ m C KEY BORING SIMPLE DEPTH LL PL PI NAT, W,Ct CLASSIFICATION r- ~ rZm ~ A 3 4-for - - - 1 .Ce°!o - roue el & turn -C' c- Red Oo A m tth m a 4,546 t _ 7.5 - 14 r *lo row "L 0 V W ,J rnw=r- v, r O U. S. Standard sieve Openings in Inches U. S. Sbndsrd Siva Numbom Nydromelor o G r -t r 3 2 11 1 + 3 4 6 8 tO 1416 20 30 40 50 60 70 100 140 200 270 :rx m l- V, C 100 0 `mo►-•m D r 7? 90 10 (A I- r z r --4 sn rn 7? t/I L11 Z T~ Q* f BO 20 C) rr V) v rn Co 70 30 r' .e o n 7C- •y 60 40 3 -4 t V 50 S U. t~ c 40 60 30 70 J jam. 20 80 N I 10 90 S 0 100 100 50 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 3 - t•1in Size in Millimeters Z g q E a t3 rn Coors* Fine costs* Msdiw Fint SILT or CLAY D v ' n m n O D O ~ 7~ rNZ c KEY BORING SAMPLE DEPTH LL PL PI NATO W4C8 CLASSIFICATION ¢ ZM,3 4, _to I 1 - .3% 5 1 o coarse ar, pACJ~ CO c,1 r rn ~mn fo 4 9 2 8 ~ 1 - Zio 5P- Stl VAd - bro n , >b 0 v w UNIFIED SOIL CLASE1FICATION SYSTEM { ASTM: D ' 24871 - My or divisions Mks Typical names Laboratory deasification Gift" Mw/2 MYeli9radsd gravels, gravelvnd Deo 4: c6 between 1 and 3 mixtures, little or no fines "~Dte Dto~rw CW G o~ N ea g Poorly graded gravels. gravel- $ w Not meeting all gradation requirements fear GW GP send mixtures, little or no fines i 0 -a Z `c d Silty gravels, gravekan"It N y Atterberg limits below "A" i _ GM u mixtures line or P.I. less than 4 iG d V " x Above "A" line with P.I. 1 o o t9 C'> between 4 and 7 are bor 1 N 2 dsrJint cases requiring use g 5 GC Clayey gravels, grove a+d elay t Atterberg limits above "A" of dual symbols p c I a mixtures e« line with P.I. greater than 7 Q Deo ' tD3ot: '•2N V - Well-graded sands, gravelly e C -5-10 greatEthan 8 Ce between 1 arxf 3 sands, little or no firm u Dto D3o~s0 o V Poorly graded sends, gravelly' . for SW Not meeting all gradation raquirer.ni r w sands, little or no fines R o o « i r C Atterberg limits below' A" g c SM S'dty sends. sae ti4ilt mixtures U4 line or P.I. lass than 4 Limits plotting in hatched cc - e , zone with P.I. between 4 c 0 s4 a and 7: are borderline cases requiring use of dual sym J! o Clayey sand:, asnd-dey mix- g c a « Atterberg limits above "A" boss. SC tares >e $ 'r 2 nn dine with P.l. greater than 7 GO $ ` t Inorganic silts and very fine 1 sands, rock flour, silty or day- ML ey fine sands or clayey silts 8 with slight plasticity For classification of f nevinned _ • Inorganic clays of low to me- soils and fine fraction of coarse- dium plasticity, gravelly days. So grained soils. CL sandy days, silty clays, lean Atterberg Limits plotting In $ ' days hatched area are borderline das6i y 'o ficstions requiring use of dual zo 5 symbols. C j OL Organic silts and organic silty x 40 Equation of Aline: 2 days of low plasticity PI-0.73 (LL - 20) At 30 Inorganic silts, micaceous or MH diatomaceous fine sandy or OH an j MH c silty soils, elastic silts d `.P 20 7F___ inorganic days of high piss- CL CH tieity, fat days 10 r sE F 7 e La OL M Organic clays of medium to , OH high plasticity, organic silt's p 10 20 30 40 50~ 60 70 80 90 100 ' Liquid Limit c 2 Pt past and other highly organic Plasticity Chart _ soils ser.v,~s s.w..mr ~m _ •m.wd .ww~.,e ami.~ Ems 2! ptaeaaMr gr CORP tcrep S34i x~E j 9! Ft- ,L TM Contractor should be roduftN to adjust two moisture content of two sell to rlthf►-d Nrrou range over the Spt►esO "later# content lac defined ►y the applicable Procter or YfM" ?*Ott. "a placement of comported fill for support of temMstleha. CIO" Slobs. Pevfsseto, or north 20 910eras till ahaald be placed within .bout 2% of optimum. The need ter moisture ceatrol to strueturaa should be nrrfrd. euR ►Y on eeperienced secovater with the proper "uipetnt. TAe mere M141.! as the ee runs." of It.*. lner.wos. matorally-eccurfl" aloray Sent or errswtor most be prepares to daps him procedure., Oquipoont. end materlois to the typo st eohe iWtwi-ro" Ito so0Pft Ira Often such Sutter than in* optimum. PI•tinq and ettowinq to Pro)rutt.rat requlrenvata at. tot arahltect 0*6 engineer. compact such soils tax the seeelfird Aenslt may be Oltt/colt. e[ Sot Possible. Oven It Nethode and mste[lats ufrd fn sumnrr sew not be spptiwble I. W.teri fill seed to dry eompncted to the its to density. oxepaa/rely wet a if my mot be seltable an floor ilsa or excavations way net be Suitable to wet excavations of during Period* of precipitation$ proposed pavement abbgradeo Are to pawp/ht under OPp1114 Iona. This is especially true 'hen rot nslw /sews-coM.lve roll a used as Nckfiil to utility trenches under ratahat . teCo.$lwely met 1)11 in thick 1111 sections war t•use post .construction settlement beysta.d t estimated for toil mail may requira. vetting or drying ter proper placement aed COwpfrtfon. Condotlona me r also rob addressee wry during to the the nurse p[project et drawings project or in d/lterent teas of the site. These needs ahoald be fill plae,d St or nsst 1l7U the eptmmuw :metKure content.. 2CAVA and fperltisstlona.:. C1teSVnfloSli7lct/l1L Ott~Q• M~ TMtf TMLC, he /aetptlose. to lthis y be would be for permeability roll evil*" to s .tod olan for • such sell ahorl0wsatly be places at tt to et above the apUmem melatvN Coolant. to provide for a common to have to excavate and repteee seseltable Belts below the motor table for Site later. /n►ft.. perwsabflity. At so. ehr iMinq/awelltnq waits Ie.p.naive Stall should be placed at err.ctfo on. sbeut 24 to N abev. options metatun to tedue* the possibility of soil expansion :10"y r silt. M • but t ruie pnot be not mitted. unless She t.CSvmwetloa J derl~dt red. Silt, or. very silty floe $$.a should not be placed Ostensively dry. Such Solis undergo correction. it to e.cava p4raactltlf N1 o+ the M vales table P peat-nnstroctlen consolidation upon being vetted, even it the spec/tfod density had been Merseus s probteals saedewloP when this Procedure to attempted rlteouCAewtasUg. achieved. This' Is caused by the collapse of a flocculent 101.1 particle arrangement.. and can Inability of the equipment operators and M13 technicians result is settlement of buildings or slobs constructed over the soil. to observe, that all gasuit*ble. wlle/notstUL haw been ►rppet central of fill sell Moisture is the responsibility of the assswter. Toms excavator rumored from tbS Sued of the excavation. should evaluate the Mid ter WttlM or drying the sells, ted either On in* data to the 0e1l . bringiM In Ott•sil* fill. it to a1N Ma ` repose. er his van site testing. It tM coca "or N Ihablllty to seoe see red seutlre tnat. proper lateral over rssponS1bfllty to ewlaate the moisture Coatent of the Soil. and the hard tog Setting or drying. S/ting I ! Pror10e01 we recommend that. this manor be addressed. in the project. specifications. Inability to prevent or Correct slo"hl" Of secsvatlem CONSTRUCTION tanhe~fp Sidewelis. which cse: rSeUlt in unsuitable tails trapped within the Select bscktlll. Stier the select fill has been OIaNO, compacted, and tsaeed. It most be maintained and Inability of the contractor to adequately and unltotmty p+etectrd is order to property Support structures. Tha suitability of compacted t/il Soil can be greatly dfmintahad it it is allowed to tweeze, became Saturated while "confined (seek of is SempfK the bepkt/11. tasting encw/tlon• or at tam surface of slab/piatwment subgradel. er disturbed . by constroct/ee not . possibility he et diatios. of tbe wlubt♦ wilt at the best Of the SeKratfon The responsibility sty ferprotecting the gall. for utr6*6 So any disturbance. nheele be clearly N/lord in tbe.0eeft/Netenf. f &alls which hteA become wt aM Sett after r eawpaction testing Ao not Mrmall chosen at the esetracter's apt/n. Shcold follow ►r dt"t MCesaerfly reflect /naccorlte field density toots. dspoctaly milt Mn-obphafre 71m1 deretering dice. . Y cohoalve/aeml•cohesive solla, saturation When uo00efi." cos a.verely reduce eha fhlaI te_ re^~_!_h eonltraetlon practice. ixewattonr in Clay Can et ten be dewaterrd with :comp plta and.. pwpst while the density r.mllne adequate. The reduced Moor .tro"th son cause looting IR~oof-. abs. this technique "old not be applicable for s:)seat ion *standing g let* Pero onatel/rrw11•r Should or pavesrnta to settle of fall urdar land. No set really treatment that all gvernt oubgrsdea be eeperlatlrr for depths, significantly Oelnr the oatar to test. tolled lhn/My speellice 1" 2111 imm diately before past". to deletmlae it the lwbgfade normally be done with v 11 points of WIts: mhos Mraterlnq is headed. we a~~ongly hot not been protected Ind SoR . .pets have Aew loped. construct that the chosennrby be )Contract at Should b ti at . reviewed prevlewed by OA -efd,e thet archltec tinan. Text ereer•co before pro-bid emend re ►L000 ~Idm MOM-09 &V OTILITY 11E N~ construction star by the should met be left u e re way. englme.z (ore "a selection oftp it shvald hat be left until rwvatlwh is sneer nn de 17 utetla7s is important when working in denatured .seawtlona. This !►ont of aemstraetlen Prassets spelSi problems, especially lf the dab Swgrnse is allowed des wihatiea of proper beret! 11y not and the contractor must be careful hot to disturb to trews, own the soil the", it wdergoes a period of temparatily lower abuse Strength. Chen with Aeree to the bate he f ktlil: be 'a Clear 00dium to Coarse ,rain timr` .lobs" should M be cost over sett In such awakened or !rote. condition. Ireference Sthe SaO ribest. best. is 1mes.r t eha to eas Sttps to+nq the thoe es 1e l200 oft ssieo bnc pertinent PCh and hC1 publlestionel. To do so eon result in cracked end failing slabs. The . : p.. , ve. Th. uee of silty ..sand, clayey sued. at tHte ppoelled to head and tharo Nt101ng may place the egnstruetioa schedule and/or colts in Cohesive/Ssel-nAeslvo sells is not apated nded fale hsea slobs.Sa . as the bseatlll excavator Nlorshould be jropsfdy. Ns . strongly recommend that this natter be reviewed in pr.-bbd sad. pre-construction --~tsang>iSe br ebe proposed notarial Ul Aep pll anstou_. e._ the meetings. till is haula0 to the nsta, se that !t ear, be taste or sac iyer6k eMTNwOSR SsM1TMMttas sackfilli" of utility trenches in the floor slab subgrlde am be difficult. - if the Soft 1S met. compaction to the specified deMlty my be difficult. at notpossible. The narrowly set hrora presents its own range of problems which Want be Overcome$ the situation may 60 trenches may preclude time sap of proper compaction equipment. with the See of foal/ puipment cooper sari in. confined areas, the contractor :mas t place the soil to We lifts Lt to 6 Inchefl.. with the complicated by the nee) for deWatnring discussed obew. Soil. at the proper moisture content. This tot% 1s tyRlefUy Carried out by contractors ether conditions. tbs. till used must Mt be froten when delivered to the Site. it than tax "as grading or -earthwork contractor. we atraagly r/eowMnd that the responsibility to girl" at Setnq Corry mat the Compaction be clearly detailed in the applicable section of the specifications, it rotItes to treerttreeteng daring temples M is part rr o on n the het filfoill : tyy e. Olsen the the ability ,p.cttiate wet the and ...lowed with the aPp.oprlsN contractor and subcontractor. roil miss Malmiltls not keeping allowed . aonstrrttloS Otarta. for tegtltte the E'011tf a contractor to . subeit 1 sample . e[ his proposed fill before ppore :nSt rt should Suittable.y Iteasshoouuld be frejected.l. aIn;yynt Serasilty .Sind ngclaayyey Send.' andMeohesiwhgoot ' _ - cohesive. "its should set be bond as ii11 under !testing eos0itlons. All francs soil of any trpo Should be rejected for Sea as compacted fill. It is important that Convicted fill be protected from treating after It to plated. TA. excavator should be v*goired to Svbnit a pia# for protecting. the sap/... "a plan Should include "tall$ on the type and amount of notarial tstraw.. blankets„ extra loose till, topsoil, etc.! proposed tar Saa aa. front protection. The Mod to protect the soil trove treating Is 0"01" throughout construction and speedos both befote attar concrete is placed, until bsettiiting tae final treat protoctfes 1s tonpleted. tiers Placed 00 fresco soil sales osparionee beaving and eigniticaot astt/eme t. rotation. or *that movement ms the 0011 taws. such SDemount can elao occor it the watt Is $$loweed to ![sere Sit" the aoorrot. is placed and then .Slowed to than The higher the ptycehtsge of flees fatal and silt.. ►400 meterlall /S the t1/1, the sere critical.. in the. Med tat protection from iraesinq. am tomsutt"te. era. ' fml Some Vtlnmrf.ImC a I ames R. Hill October .6,. 1983 { I - I Mr. Dale Peterson Building Inspector I w 3795 Pilot Knob Road s Eagan, MN 55122 a RE. ~L =;14..AND 15,.~;BLQCK 7' , HILLTOP ESTATES Dear Mr. Peterson: At the req west of Sienna Corporation, we have t ken field elevations on Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 7 to determine existing conditions for the purpose of suggesting methods of draining the -rear yards of said lots. i We have attached a plan with elevations and suggestions for your review and for assistance to the builder when construe ing homes on Lots 14 and 15. You will note that the existing rear yard rade of the home on'Lot 16 4 is 892.6 whichalong`with the rear yards of Lot 14 and 15, should drain to the curb on Blueberry Circle which is at.an elevation of 891.9. N Two methods are available: One: Fill the rear yards `of 'Lots 14 and 1 so that a drainage swale can be maintained from Lot 16 hru Lot 15 and then to the street. This will require uplto six feet of fill in the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 and some filling on Lot 16; the Swale will only be a 0.3~+ percent grade because of the existing house grade on Lot 16. The drainage swale;shown across the corner of Lot 14 and r thru' Lot 15 will have to be provided with an easement. i Two: A second method for drainage would be to not fill the rear yards, let water pond, provide for an emergency overflow swale as shown on the attached drawings, and `construct a "wet well that may or may not slowly drain the ponding area. One or two soil borings should be required to, determine if and at what depth a sandy stratum can be found. The effectiveness of the "wet well" will depend on the type of soil, perkolation, and mainte- nance. i r 8200 HUMROLDT 1\VF\0_1F SOUTH • RL00NIIR'GTON • .\11tiRESOT,A = 5431 • 612-884-3029 a Mr. Dale Peterson RE: LOTS 14 AND 15,, BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES October 6,-1983 page 2 The emergency swale must be constructed and maintained so.that homes are not flooded. The swale must have an easement across Lot 14. In either method, Lot 15 must provide for (in deed) drainage of adjacent lots. Sincerely, JAMES R. HILL,, INC. James R. Hill JRH/sh Enclosure cc: Sienna Bob Rosene j Toren Spande f James R. Hill, inc. JAr. R. F~,LL, ~IVC. ~ttp~nUh~~ 8200 Humboldt Avc 50 g Z 4 610omi;,j;on. MN go~' ~D X 98,E X S ~~y3 i 4L ggi,5 ey~.9 It2.3 7,7 - 7Q toy B1t,~~~ $11,~ PJip' ~ sB8$' ~ d)o7 ~f3 T) (LAI B QA1.G. ».y Pr, yr--~wi►~r tool 9y17 +~q~y 8u:9 Bfl./,LU O LeLktL~ r I, '~SI~//I~rj c/ ~ l!~ 'Q 8~s 8 sT~~IC `~7 ow Y ~y ~9f,,r NpusE 3 c y~, l ra of Ca 4,ca ~ e~ air d9s:S ` WI/~ 1c eytlf r - SW 8200 Humboldt Ave S0 o 1 L ~ ~-9A►n►Ih~~ 1Ut~►-~- C!,G~,~G!/~Lr ~ Bloom' n 1 at 9fon, MN 55831 g /S a IIi17' $13q AL 89 'S B .9 91.3 N 4 ' J;WG f.~r2,! Go ~ a +t P9~' ~ ltJ ToP $wALV X INC. Z B1 t,1~~ 819• Bl1A' "6a Bto•7i Z 7c oil t:7 a ~m k '~tSTIAIG s Ak) ss NouSF 8~0 ~ rc At "4ji4C-k)4(-L 57 $2G~ HumbolsJC ,",v:, , BloOmin,ton. V ,~L ~ ~~-tP►h11h1~' V~Pl- V . 1 90'4 ,t 98~ Z 4i V IT *4 )ZAP --%41 ~ ~qi,s 894,9 92.3 A 1~1 I7 L PB7,7 895.1 ~a,~I r\ ~ X 8+s. 2 IYA Rd B~f~r~ 1t1,~ y~PNA. ,88 Bto.7 f ~),Gf,Vp ey1 qa,y++.q etr.~ o LevtD- s J/w a ?ct T~AIC .8 S Aouse ~iyr-I I ~ !fG riy t r C . it ♦ r I '1 W4TT*L^WO MD~FORQ ICIEKOW K~OWt•@R t. .I . y r GMATTaItTlani • R- 60.5 AGR65 10$ tars ~'~1 X-3 oil OTAI-sue t ( PbND j C%ISTIAIG`ZONINti AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT / 1 r, ! WdYMOUTW F - 1w r&pw. , , SM~Jrs~i//'' r T cywe~T T 1 f r N?~ PoN D I L.+wus To et • ) + t ~,i j - t \ 1 TS }~AT.L t I ~ . I C.W%q, 10N OM TO W_ C ea.o a c {Tw n t 7 ^ DIS t { l~ _ - ` rata •.:c. -T -,wo.:o•2~e~lw ~.,,Zf'bl,~. btJWt.(~ti'ir~~. - COUN7Y GOAD NO. W AAL CASH RECEIPT `CITY OF EAGAN P. b. BOX 21-199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 DATE 19'°` RECeweD g P FROM. AMOUNT & DOLLARS '00 CASH CHECK J FUND CODE AMOUNT Thank You {,.j 5 3 3 3 23 White-Payers Copy Yellow-Posting COPY Pink-File Copy '7Lr~01 l Ii9TIBUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (RESIDENTIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB RD - 55122 681-4675 ca c New Construction Requirements Remodel/Repair Requirements ♦ 3 registered site surveys ♦ 2 copies of plan ♦ 2 copies of plans (include beam & window sizes; poured Md. design; etc.) ♦ 2 site surveys (exterior additions & decks) ♦ 1 energy calculations ♦ 1 energy calculations for heated additions ♦ 3 copies of tree preservation plan if lot platted after 7/1/93 required: _Yes No s DATE: CONSTRUCTION COST; DESCRIPTION OF WORK: < Grp I STREET ADDRESS: L L% 1 e-V i C v' C' LOT: r~ BLOCK: SUBD./P.I.D. Name: ~GA,>A-)Ife- l~ Phone PROPERTY Last First OWNER Street Address: ~~/~l City ~G 4 d State: Zip:5 Company: p , ' c Phone CONTRACTOR Street Address: ~ License # City Z ~I, State: Zip: 5 33 ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER Company: Phone Name: Registration Street Address: City State: Zip: Sewer & water licensed plumber (new construction only): Penalty applies when address chang and lot change is requested once permit is issued. I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is rrect and agre 4,0,~b :with all applicabi State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Applicant: 4 OFFICE USE ONLY Certificates of Survey Received Yes No Tree Preservation Plan Received Yes No Not Required OFFICE USE ONLY BUILDING PERMIT TYPE ❑ 01 Foundation ❑ 06 Duplex ❑ 11 Apt./Lodging ❑ 16 Basement Finish ❑ 02 SF Dwelling ❑ 07 4-plex ❑ 12 Multi Repair/Rem. ❑ 17 Swim Pool ❑ 03 SF Addition ❑ 08 8-plex ❑ 13 Garage/Accessory ❑ 20 Public Facility ❑ 04 SF Porch ❑ 09 12-plex ❑ 14 Fireplace ❑ 21 Miscellaneous ❑ 05 SF Misc. ❑ 10 = plex ❑ 15 Deck WORK TYPE ❑ 31 New ❑ 33 Alterations ❑ 36 Move ❑ 32 Addition ❑ 34 Repair ❑ 37 Demolition GENERAL INFORMATION Const. (Actual) Basement sq. ft. MC/WS System (Allowable) Main level sq. ft. City Water UBC Occupancy sq. ft. Fire Sprinklered Zoning sq. ft. PRV # of Stories sq. ft. Booster Pump Length sq. ft. Census Code. Depth Footprint sq. ft. SAC Code Census Bldg Census Unit APPROVALS Planning Building Engineering Variance Permit Fee Valuation: $ Surcharge Plan Review License MCNVS SAC City SAC Water Conn. Water Meter Acct. Deposit S/W Permit S/W Surcharge Treatment Pl. Park Ded. Trails Ded. Other Copies Total: % SAC SAC Units / 17 ~/a 1991 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS MULTIPLE DWELLINGS COMMERCIAL 2 SETS OF PLANS 2 SETS OF PLANS 2 SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL 3 REGISTERED SITE SURVEYS REGISTERED SITE SURVEYS - & STRUCTURAL PLANS 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS (CHECK WITH BLDG. DEPT.) 1 SET OF SPECIFICATIONS 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCS # OF RENTAL UNITS # OF FOR SALE UNITS PENALTY APPLIES WHEN: TYPING OF PERMIT IS REQUESTED, BUT NOT PICKED UP BY LAST WORKING DAY OF MONTH IN WHICH REQUEST IS MADE, LOT CHANGE IS REQUESTED ONCE PERMIT IS ISSUED. NOTE: ADDRESSES FOR CORNER LOTS CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER MUST DESIGNATE WHICH ADDRESS IS DESIRED. NO CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED ONCE BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. PROCESSING TIME FOR SEWER & WATER PERMITS IS TWO DAYS ONCE A PERMIT HAS BEEN COMPLETED. PERMIT MUST SHOW A LICENSED PLUMBER. To Be Used For: .t-- ,.__Q$~_ j g,,,,, luation: Date: Site Address L4 la OFFICE USE ONLY U /-ft nJ Lot Block _Z FEES a~` o Occupancy Bldg. Permit Zoning Surcharge Parcel/Sub Actual Const Plan Review Allowable SAC, City Owner # of stories SAC, MWCC Length Water Conn. Address t'//S N , CA Depth Water Meter S.F. Total Acct. Deposit City/Zip Code Gae..~ )I?YV Footprint S.F. S/w Permit S/W Surcharge Phone S CIS On site sewage- TreaLment Pl. On site well Road Unit Contractor MWCC System Park Ded. City water Trail Ded. Address 2,-7OO n>ow..,r~,o__ PRV Copies Booster Pump City/Zip Code `j"'J/t]S'l l SUBTOTAL APPROVALS Penalty Phone Planner Lot Change Council TOTAL C~=s D Arch./Engr. Re~ ack" Bldg. Off. P Ces~,~..e Variance Address D--700 A,), ....,cam ~ City/Zip Code -77/J fSrj l LA. 1. -*HT 7)o 3) 3a00uL C-- s'(o ag n->> R~SrJ3~- i Phone # 63 3 Ca k- K- &CLf GJNJ / WOO~SF-oUe~V.,~o~.C1c~t l`tO~~TC~80 379~~R F Ge,~~~ ( ( agrees that all work shall 5e done in accordance with {Sig Lure of Contractor) T- all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Sep 10 13 01:44p Sunrise Remodelers 651-762-9395 p.1 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 1-----------------, 1 For Office Use I a`. Permit#: I10`~~ City of Eagan nc C 1 3830 Pilot Knob Road i Permit Fee: 1C 1 a J I 1 Eagan MN 55122 l Date Reeeived: ro f/ l Phone: (651) 675-5675 I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 j Staff: j L------- --------1 2013 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: A -6,13 Site Address: 4"154 Blve-be4r( av-4, Unit 0: Name: t~_~t DGtyl ~t ~1C Phone: _ / Z - 27 6 - Z 3 4 Residenti Owner Address/ City! Zip: `T15"f 1.N(Je.~e-rry Cil^dt- Applicant is: Owner V Contractor Description of work: ~u'r E GVJ r t- f'00- Type of Work Construction Cost: $ 3~! ~Ct 3 - Multi-Family Building: (Yes I No V ) Company: $Ur1T'~ e, ~~tMQGiQ,IP~S Contact 0~wl l PefCrs0`-t Contractor Address: 5276 14obe, Lave, City, ~D40 State: P1AI Zip: _ S r5 i,a) Phone: G51 - 76 Z- 9 2-'? 5 License«: G(Z(~S(Sld Lead Certificate AIA-r- ZZc? 33 If :he project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: !li®iE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information clay be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL. BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours befcre you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utililies. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the worts vAll be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start vrilhout a permit; that the work wil', be in accordance with the approved plan in the case ofwork which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 18o days of permit issuance- x ~G ~~j" ~Tn'rl.~✓\ ~01a.o.. . X Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA122333 Date Issued:05/05/2014 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4154 Blueberry Cir Lot:15 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-150 Use: Description: Sub Type:Siding & Windows/Doors Work Type:Replace Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Please print pictures of house wrap and leave on site for final inspection. When installing ventilated soffit material, remove existing material (i.e. debris that could block vents) and take steps to ensure maximum ventilation to attic. Call for final inspection after installation. Valuation: 8,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $8K $162.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $8K $4.00 9001.2195 $166.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Edmund Dannecker 4154 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Sunrise Remodelers 5976 Hobe Lane White Bear Lake MN 55110 (651) 762-9295 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature Jun 03 14 12:41p Sunrise Remodelers City of Eaaari 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: {651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 flECEIVE JUN 032014 BY:I 4119 651-762-9395 p.1 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office UseS Permit 4: / `° 351 Permit Fee: Date Received: /i DM/ Staff: L 2014 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: (0-3-19- Site Address: 'f"t S /3/(/t V r(' C• (re Unit #: Name: Ed Pe-Aim/lecke-I" Phone: 612.-2.76 -232* Resident/ 'J Owner Address ! City / Zip: Y-� 5`t ��) t/dy b exry ; ! 1 Applicant is: Owner VContractor ! Description of work: f3ui IGS i Z xis 1.: cc wt.. 5+7,-:: _ rS Type of Work Construction Cost: S 51 56©, 913 Multi -Family Building: (Yes _ ! No V ) 1 Company: r5Jrlr ;S2 l�w4.�,� Contact: ..-57,e4 )o Pe -SO v' Contractor Address: 597(0 1 b -e.. L. .viz City: 51-• Mel I Stale: AU) -5SIfD Phone: 651-/62-72%Email: r'1 -Ge Si?v'itSe17-eu / I 6: License #: C(.OScSfg Lead Certificate #: /11A) - 22933 - CD ( If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) le COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: 3 Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: = NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of f the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to L.____ conclude that they are trade secrets. . CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. CaII 48 hours before you intend to cig to receive locates of underground utilities. ,^rww.•:ro?iers a:eonecAl.oro hereby acknowledge that this informat'on is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that 1 understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180 days of permit issuance. � x la v%& ( ,'+l/VIPs, x { c��1 Applicant's Printed Name Applicant''''s Signature Page 1 of 3 Jun 03 14 12:41p Sunrise Remodelers 651-762-9395 p.2 154 N 4 Ci DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES Foundation _ Singie Family Multi 01 of_Plex WORK TYPES New Addition Alteration Replace Retaining Walf DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25%_ 100% y ) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction Fireplace Garage Deck Lower Level Interior Improvement _ Move Building Fire Repair Repair Porch (3 -Season) Porch (4 -Season) Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) Pool Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) Foundation Roof: Ice & Water Final Framing Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test Final Insulation Sheathing Sheetrock Fire Walls Braced Walls Siding Reroof Windows Egress Window Exterior Alteration (Single Family) Exterior Alteration (Multi) Miscellaneous Accessory Building Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation _ Water Damage Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Meter Size: Final 1 C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required HVAC _ Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test Pool: _Footings _Air/Gas Tests Final Drain Tile Siding: _Stucco Lath _Stone Lath Brick Windows Retaining Wall: — Footings _ Backfill ^ Final Radon Control Erosion Control Other: Reviewed By: , Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies TOTAL Page 2 of 3 Certificate for: Heritage Energy Homes Inc. 4655 Nicols Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Bk: 92/1 /3.235, /5 4. >c DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC RPCpSIPrPd Under Laws oI The SUM. M MrnnPSola 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 423-1769 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE //5' �5 8T 37- 37t, Dra na e and Utility Easement / 05 / / / , . i()./(//,/ / k • ki -tic- — O 4M 1 • 1)0- 01 PN . fo , 89 3, 89 V Proposed garage floor elev. _ &T5,0 0 Scale: 1 inch 30 feet O Denotes iron monument o Denotes set wood hub g95.s Denotes existing elevation ()Denotes proposed elevation I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of Lot 15, Block 7, HILLTOP ESTATES, according to the recorded plat there- of, Dakota County, Minnesota. Also showing the location of a ptoposed hour as stake/d/ thereon. v fY! .� MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 25 figI ` Dated: June 24, 1985 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA139030 Date Issued:10/05/2016 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4154 Blueberry Cir Lot:15 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-150 Use: Description: Sub Type:Fireplace Work Type:Gas Fireplace (new) Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home may require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. Chimney / flue must be inspected prior to concealing. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Valuation: 3,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $3K $88.50 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $3K $1.50 9001.2195 $90.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Edmund Dannecker 4154 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Fireside Hearth & Home 2700 Fairview Ave N Roseville MN 55113 (952) 985-6675 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature