Loading...
4158 Blueberry CirThis re4uest void tb?( ( 18 moniti3 from ._3524 8 -f -c I _'U = ques ate Fire No. I Requhed?Inspeciion ?Ready Now WiII Noirfy Inspec- g O es ?No V tor When Ready icensed Electrical Contractor I hereby request inspection of above Owner :electcicaP work instslled at: Sireet Address, Box or Route'No. 1115P Al &/ City eetion o'.' Township Name or No Range No. - Cbu ty ' OccupanY (PRINT) , Phone No. P wer Suppiie ? vu,? /e?.fr.? Address Electjipal Co??ctor IC m any Name4 ,r ?/? ? tractor's Lense No. Mailing Address tContractor or Owner Making+instailation) <:? =nature (Contractor/Owner Making Ins Ilation {(` c Phon ?umbe 1 'i g NESOTA STATE gOAR?F ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTiON REQUEST IMILC:NOT gs-Midway Bldg. - Rom N-191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE SFATE BOARD 1-821 Un'ivePSity Ave., St. Pau4, MN 55104 UNLE$S PROPER' INSPECTION PEE IS Phone (612) 297-2111 ENCLOSED. REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL 1NSPECTION ee-00001_03 , ?3t-S 2 4 8 , See instructions for completing this form on back of yellow capy. ")V" Be/ow Work Covered bv This RPrnlPct 4 if #- Fee ServiceEntranceSize tt FQS Feeders /S ubfeeders #Fe e Circuits Q to 100 Am s 0 to 30 qm S to 30 Rm s 1 Q1 to 200 qrrips 3tto 100AmPs b 31 to 100 q S Above 20Q_Ams Abo0Am Above 100_lampg Transformers Remote,Gontrol Girc. Par ' R ??9ns Speciallnspection e ?, emarks . : _ S 1 ora-Vy ..? 1 oug -in ' Date .,Ar the ElectricaF o l? rftrpector. hereby Final ? p?? certify that the above spection has been'- ihis request void iQ F* , d` ade. e Add Rft. . TyPe of Buiiding .. .. qppliances Wired .: .? C....• ?C . EqUipment'Wired Home Range Tempprary Service Duplex Water Weater Lighting Fixtures _ ,;?t? Buildin?;K Dryer E}ectric Heatin Commercial Bidg. Furnace Silo Unloader industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Ta?rk Farm Other Specifv Other(Suecify) t er Speeify Other Other CO!/ ]pUt B lns nPCtinn Foo Rol...., CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knab Ra?ii, P.Ca Box 21•199, Eagan, MN 55121 'PHONE:454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT tteceipt # Te b, w"d im UECK Est. Vo?ue $1,000 pate JUNE o N- 10 4 01 13 lq 85 SiteAddresa 4158 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect (3 Occupancy Lot 16 elock 7 Sec/Sub. HILLTOP EST Remodel ? 2oning Parcel No Repair ? Type of Const. . Addition ? No. Stories DAN OSBORN Move ? Length W Neme' SAME Demolish ? Depth ; Address Int. Impc ? Sq. Ft. b City Phone 452-5614 Install ? Apoeovals Fees Zo Name SAME pu A??$ uI Assessment Permit I- City Phone Water & Sew. Surcharge e50 & Police Plan Review gZ Name Ffre SAC H Address Eny. Water Conn. tW City Phone Plonner Water Meter Council Road Unit ( hereby ocknowledge that 1 have rebd this opplication ond state that gldg. Off, 6 7$ rJ Tr. PL the iniormotion is torrect ond_ ogree t compil wit pplicable Stote of Minnesota Stat City Eq O ?ce . APC Parks ' Var. Date Sipnotum of Pertnittee '?•G'? ?~ ? Copies ? $18 . 00 t K euildin Pertnit is issued to: DAN OSBORN 9 ? ? e X preas condiNon thot all work sholt be done in occo?do with all opptiwbJa State of #0 to Statutes ond City o3 Eeyon Ordinonces. : Buildirq Officiol ? v_? ?i i'-?a.m'`-? WATER SERVICE PERMIT CITY OF EAGAN 4 3795 IlMot ' Knob Road PERMIT NO.: 9/zj? Eogrin MN 85122 DATE: j , ??fning: No. of Units: Owner: DeVeZOpE:Z& CvT1StI'uCt]Ari ndaress: ?+15f' Biu ?-?Y'?? 7 ?°i? ??- *,,.? ?st at es Site Address: Plumber: ?SE'_ e rce i7CenC;ti'25z tion Charge: 4 2 0•00 od Meter No.: Connec Size: Account Deposit: D-e Reader No.: Permit Fee: 1 ugree to eomPlY with the City of Eogon Surchqrge: Gt? (?0 T5d ????Z Ordinonees. ` Misc. Chorges: TotaL• BY Dote Paid: Date of I nsp.: I nsp.: cirr oF EaGAN 3EWER -SERVICE PERMIT 3791, Pilot Kno6 Road PERMIT NO.: r'/ E?9a4. MN 55122 ' DATE: _ Zoning: - rT V No. of Unitsr - l Owner; PP srAnjiPra f'.czn strtirrfr,r Address: Site Address: 4 15 8 t:.tu ah nrrs {'ir L16 i7 F?i an Ed?a?Q+a Plumber: ?T?i_erk? 'I3?t1CItii?<• 9J33lz' 31F10 100,00 pd 1 og?ee to eompip w1lh the City of Eagcn Connection Charge: . 4.15 TACL-od--_ . Ordinanees. , Account Deposit: Permit Fee: _ 1 ') , r70 Surcharge: 5 BY Mi c Ch es s , arg : Dote of Jnsp.: Totol: insp.r pote Poid• _ CITY OF.EAGAN ?.., ? ' 10401 . f 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONEc 454-8100 \ .?`. ? .,} ' BUILDING MMIT Receipr # Te bR piod fer ,'3ECK Est. Velue $a o Q'00 Dote ¦? JL)NE 13 , 19----Ar'J Site Address ???? liLUE$ERRY CIR Erect 0( Qccupancy I 6 Lot Block ? HI?,L?eOi?' ES'7C Remodel ? ?ec/Sub Zomng Parce! No . Repair ? Type of Const . Addition ? No. Stories DAN OSB4Ri l? Move ? Length W ; Nanie Address Demolish ? S?`E Int Impr ? Depth S Ft b City . . Phone 452` 561 4 Install ? q. . ' : ? ..?.. % ?? 0 Name 0 , 8'j Addresa Assessment 1- City Phone Woter & Sew. F Police ?Z Name Fim ?? Address ' Eng• ? W City Phone Plonner Counci( I hereby otknowledge thot 1 hove read this opplicotion ond stote that Bldg. Off. 61??8? the informotion is correct and Qgree to comp4y with aIV 'bpplisoble Stote of Minnesoto $tatutes pGty of' Eogc?n Or¢inonces, ' ? APC , , 5ipnoturc of Pertnittee Var. Date pAN OSBORN N Building Permit is issued tot pn all work shall be done in accordonce`with oU applicablq :Stote of Mtnneso#e Stotutes ond City o9 ,?... Buildinq Official APprovob Ft?c .. : .. Permit v + • « «.., Surcharge • 50 Plan Review SAC Water Conrt Water Meter ; Road Unit Tr. PL Parks Copies Total ? 3w expreas condk%* tlxn Eopon Ordirwncir. 3 ? - Mo. Pwmit Hokiw tA?r ' Te#st?hanr * M,YA.C. ? softww l+apoetion - Date lnap. Othsr • ? i U Founastbn Fram#ne ? ?'0• "D"b Ntw ?I?u?tt1. ?? . iNeeel ihW Ftn#?I Ptbg. pinal - Gw'tlOm W?er DaaaribR 1.acatiFm: _ Weii lS?wMrK , P9r:.D??. CITti CF EAGAM ;r 374S Pqet ICnob Rooa Eogan, MN 55122 • . ? 7,514 P6?ltil: 454-8100 . BUILDING PERMIT ReceiPt To be wed for `F Est. Volue $114.000 Date SeF}temkaez' 13 19 Ei7. Site Address `? t `=l uererry C` _cle ;a Erect Octupancy 1i_ Lot $ lock ' Sec/Sub.F$iJ=ztoP EstateQ Alter ? Zoning . . P eF #' 1 ;3C'0 0 160 07 Repoir ? Fire Zone are 1 E C s nlcrge Q Type of on t. a Name _ L)'•'-Vi? Q[>E?YS COY18tY'UC'ti10;1 Move Q ,# Stories ? Address 11'??- ??•' CZiff Road Demolish p i Length ? 15 C;t„ 1,3-jr svil1e p6,,„„ 39')-E194 Grode ? Depth Sq. Ft. A Name Cravner 8" Address ?'• r:d.., eL,.__ Nama _ AddfCss _ 1 hereby ocknowledge that I have reod this application ond state that tMe informefiion is carrect and ogree to tomply with ali Gppiicoble Stote of Minnesato $totutes ond City of Eogon Ordinances. lissessment Water & Sew. Pol ice Fire Eng. Plonner Council Permit ?AIWQ• ?',' ?? Surcharge Plon theck `? SAC 2ry- '`h'w,.'.JI .. Water Conn. ? Woter AM1eter Rood Unit 2 4 Bldg. Off. APC Totoi ????G Siyncture of Permiitee A Building Pe(mit is issued ta: Devtilc>?:?ez's CC»13'?ruCtican on the expresd corWMan thni all work sholi be done in ctccordarxe with dll opplicoble ?'Yate af MiaqesciFa Stntutes qnd City of Eogan OrdinqrnCes. ?aiiltlinn Offieinl , t ?fe , , ? .. . ? .. , ?. ?_ : . . . . ... . ?:?.. ? . . _ .. . .. . . . , . ".... : .. ,' . .... ,_ .:.. . . . . .. . . ? . ? . , .. ? ?? ??? ? . .. ? ' . . . . f f . . . ? ... ?. ' , ??-. r' ... y- ? f , • ,N. v , ?.... ? y. .... :? _. . .? ool • ' ?' . . ? . . ? ,. ?- ' 17 . , :. 6 . ,_ . . _ . . . .. _? . ? . . . ... . ? . . . .,: C1t1eS D1glt al Qualily Control The following image represents the best available image from the original page. Every effort was made to capture the content from the original page. ?s# .2 .? ?7? PLtlFAB1NG P'ERAAIT Permit No. 1 1J CiTY OF EAf3AN Fee Fill in numbered sPeces S/C TYpe or Print /egibly Tot. 1. Date C) 2. Installation Cost 3. Job Address ' LotBik. 7 Tract r n 4. Owner 5. Contractor Phone . . 6. Address f . . s ` 7. City State Zip t . 8. Building Type: Residentiai q-' Cammercial O Institutional ? 9. Work Description: New El Add ? Alter ? Repair ? 10. Describe 11, ` 42. t twreby oer#ify #hat 1he above informatian is trus arrd ctrrrec#, and 1Wee to mmp1Y with mii c?rdina and s governing thia type of wrork. - Sigried. -7' for Rttu?? FkW No, ` Fixtures Water Closet No. Fixtures CesspooUDrainfield Bath tubs Se tic Tank % Lavatory p Softner Shower Wel l Kitchen Sink Urinal/Bidet Other Laundry Tray Floor Drains Drinking Ftn. ' Slop Sink Gas Piping Outlets ?.? „?,.?T,,;..?, a -? _ .:' MECHANICA4RMIT PermkNa. CIT'Y t?P EAOAN Fee ? fill in numberL4 spaces S/C ` Type or Print l*illy Tot. 1. Date 2. Installation Cost ,. 3. Job Address ?,bt?Bik. 7 Tract `?: 4. Owner ...?. , 5 Contractor, 6. Address 7. City 8. Building Type: Residential El 9. Work Description: New 0 10. Describe 11. 12. dhem-bY-mrtify that the above ;fiformatican is true and cnrnacti, and 1agree t4 comply uvita a11 ardinantes antl r.odes gcrvemir`g this type of wurk. `. fOt' R F?nai , lropectt'C}atS: Datt lnsp. tJBt.e ittsp. ?,._. TWs Is yo?t #ormit when rru rad atxtf +appt*ved. A d , >. VT"4F t? EA(" 4544100 n i , . _.. ? Phone _ State Zip Commercial ? Institutional ? Add ? Alter ? Repair ? Fuel Type No, Eaujpment BTU - M. Ea. Forced Air - Na- ` Equipment CFM Mfg. Air Handling: Boilers Mfg . Mech. Exhaust Unit Heater Mfg. Othe Air Cond. r AAfg. Gas, Piping Outlets ?-7 3 PLUMBlNG PERMIT PACeipt Wermit No. b 13 CITY 0f' EAGAN , ?--? 40 Fee Fill 1n numbered smces S/G ,..:1? Type or P?int 1egibfy Tot. -S- -?`? 1. Date C-3 2, instatlation Cost '`?.iLq,,2? 3. Jab Address ? Blk. 7_ 7ract r 4. Owner 4 r 5. Contractor •.??>r1t ?'r?L?-/? r?;f-- ??' ?"? Phone X 6. Address 7. City State; Zip 8. Building Type: :Residential Commercial ? institutional O 9. Work Description: 10. Describe 11. New t] Add ? Alter ? Repair ? No. Fixtures Water Closet No. Fixtures Cess infield ool/Dr $ath tubs p a Se ti nk T Lavatory ? p c a S ftn r Shower e o Well Kitchen Sink Urinal/Bidet Other Laundry Tray Floor Drains - Drinking Ftn. Slop Sink Gas Piping Outlets 12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to comply wit ordinances and ?04 es governing this type of work. Signed :? T Rough F inal Inspec#ions: Date Insp. Date Insp. TMis is youc-.permtt when numbered and approved. Appr'4ved :k: L_!?TY CtF EACiAN 464$100 ??_ ? Cities Digital Qualily Control ? . The following irnage represents the best available image from the original page. Every effort was made to capture the content from the original page. CASH RECEiPT ? C1TY 4F EAGAN ? 3795 PILOT KNOB RQAD EAGAN, M1NN.ESOTA 55122 r--. DATE 19 . . . Fr? .. . : RECEIVBD ? • ? FRObI. ? ? ? / . ? _ a rrt aUN T $ ,.DOLLAR$ - . . ? . 'f o.o . . ? . ? ..,,....r . ? . Q casH ?..-? cH€eK .."° 7`'r ; Z ;?t.?, 1. _..?'` ?./` ? ? '%:: ?'?`> ? FUND ?. '? CODE ?AMOUN'1' ' ? . ? ! '".> . . . . ?'4 4 ?r y ;°'^g . . . . , .??1, ..ry . . ? . . ?, . ?:.' ?.?...: ? . . .. . . . ? : . . ! ?'-? { 57 . . ?.? i,: . . , ..E -., ° ?d r•'x ?,J T Thank Yattf' ..BY-^ ? White-•PaYers CoPY Yellaw-Posting GOPY Pink-File CapY. ??? CITY OF EAGAN Remarks Addition HILLTOP ESTATES ?ot 16 Bik 7 Parc'ei _ owner ` street 4158 Blueberry Circle State Eagan, MIlV 55123 Improvement --- - Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date - - STREETSURF. 1980 ?36.72 133.67 _1 935.71 A011437 9-16-82 STREET RESTOR. _ -- GRADING - -- - - SAN SEW TRUNK 1973 172 _ 14 86.14 A011437 9-16-82 -_-- * SEWER LATERAL 19$0 3482 _ 2437.84 WATERMAIN - * WATER LATERAL ' 1980 - ? WATER AREA 198i1 - *_.Services 1980 _- ,t STORM SEW TRK 11980 * STORM SEW LAT 980 CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET UGHT ROAD UNIT -13-82 WATER CONN. 420.00 - BUfLDING PER. -- 75111 -- SAC - -- n n -- _ PARK _- - ? , .? ti ?f ?0/ 1985 BUILDING PERMIIT APPLICATION - CITY OF EAGAN NOTE: ALL CONTRACTORS l4UST BE LICENSED WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN INCLUDE 2 SETS OF PLANS 3 CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS To Be Used For : Ic- Valuation: ,190 Date: Owner^_ ;??IS(o?y Address City/Zip Code ? Phone 2-_ S p Contractor Address Site Address : 6 1 (?,? OFFICE USE ONLY Lot: ? Block -2 Sect/Sub Erect ? Occupancy Remodel Zorring Parcel # Repair Type of Canst ! City/Zip Code Phone Arch./Engr. Address City/Zip Code Phone # Enlarge ? # of Stories Move Length Demolish Depth Grade Sq Ft APPROVALS Assessments Permit a§= Water/Sewer Surcharge Police Plan Review Fire SAC Engr Water Conn Planner Water Meter Council Road Unit Bldg Off(, j Parks APC Treatment P1 Variance TOTA 7 L ? crrY oF EAGaN 9795 Pilot Knob Raad l:agan, MN 56122 N0 7514 J PHONE: 454-8100 ` 3 ?? l BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # To be used for SP DW/GM Est. Value $114r000 . Date Se Ptember I-A , 19-a2_ $158 Hlt26berry Ci7CC].!t Site Address Erect 11 Occupancy R-3 I.ot 16 Block 7 Sec/Sub.B3?ltOP EStBtOft Alter p Zoning R 1 Parcel # ].0 33000 16t3 (?9 Repoir p Fire Zone ? Enlarge Q Type of Const. v m Name DeYe1Op@1"S CbnSt2'tiCtia11 Move ? Stories Z Address 1101 E. Cliff RC?a$ Demolish p Length Q ? Ci BUrnan'11$ Phone $90"6194 Grode ? Depth ?? Sq. Ft. Approvals Fees 4 o e Address Assessment ? ~ Water & Sew. Cit Phone ?? Pol ice ? F W Name Fire Address Eng. <W Ci Phone Plonner Councii I hereby ocknowledge that I have read this application and state that gldg. Off. the information is correct and ogree to comply with oll upplicable Stote of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eogan Ordinances. p Nam ?? APC Signoture of Permittee A Buiiding Permif is issued to: ??elQ??s Constmet all work sholl be done in accordonce with oll opplicab a ?Mu Building Officiol l"""" Permit 1100. Vu Surchorge 57.04 Plon check 234+00 SAC 525.40 Water Conn420*00 Woter Meter 60 • 00 Rood Unit 240• Total 82004 . (3O _ on the express condition thnt Ciry of Eagan Ordinances. . .?? \ 4?.??? . . . . . . . . . .. . . . CI'I'i' OF EAGAN Inc lude 2 sets af plans, 1 site glan wjelevations & u? BUILDING PE_RMIT APPLTCATION 1 set of erexgy ca3.culations. „ 4- Gco?- To Be Usec1 Far Valuation ? Date ?I.- Site Pddre ss s OFFICE USE ONLY Lot Blc>ck ? Sec. /Sub. \? s?, Erect occupancy Parcel # c 10 3 3 vo o /(00 0-7 Alter Zoning Repair Fire Zone Owner' p? Enlarge 3'ype of Const. Nbve # Stories J Acldress: &o,%=? Demolish Front 7 ft. CitY/Zip Code: e/,l- c- Grade Depth 3s? ft. Phone # : D , APPMVALS FEES Contractor: Assessments Permi.t Y08 ? Address• Water/S?r Surcharge ?'7 -- ' Police Plan Check City/Zip Code: Fire SAC .-.- Fhone #: ?g• Water Conn. ?r? ? Planner Water Meter 610 ? Council Road Unit ;z?yd ?- Arch-/Eng• : Bldg. Off. Address: ApC C.ity/Zip Code: ? t Phone #; 'IC7i'AL o?? 00 ? ? ? qo? ? ?LV I ? ( 3,5 3 ? 1 t.3 srtiPicate forr x ` & Curry 8'1( 78 Survey for : L Developers Gonst, Inc. 1101 Cliff Rd., Burnsville Mn' DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LANDSURVEVOR Raqistyed Undfr Laws of The State ot Minnesota 2978 - 148TH 3TREfT W. - BOX M ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 56Q68 PHONE 812 423-1769 SURVEYUR'SCERTIFICATE 87p31'3?`E . h -? D Denotes set wood hub & tack fV". -: R 5 /25'41)enotes exiating elevation . ? lo Denotes proposed eleuation / -?---- Denotes direet3on of surface water I ? Proposed -garage floor 19 elev. - /oZ.o . W I 'v5h1 J t co oL 7' 1 0 " House staked August 20, 1982 _ 0r ? / Ia a 7oP i??a? J : ?„ Cb f _ 15•oo ? ti° ?6??`".? .?_ tn• /p? Tp ?Q /?? /f e? ?? ?' ?` ?'' p .? t?a PRoPa?-.-E?J 1 ' (08 ?P`v Alt 7 ?4?6 ?a ?? ?--- -- ??p°~? ?c? ? ?k3 M ,?,,tt,?,.ti , ?? ?' N . ?? .. ? ?n • c? d % ?? , ,61 aq ? I hereby QeartiPy that thiffi is a tr?u and correct repre- L U E'F3 $entation ct Lot 16, Blvck 7, HZLLTOP ESTATBS, according to the L E,,, recordsd pist thtrscsf, Dakota County, -r Cma TcP 4 Minnea0ta. Datscl: Oo+bober 10, 1979 `"•A 'gq,x Approved Por Dunn & Curry Rem1. f Eatate Management, Tna. ? .. F ?? ?w by : MINNESOTA REGISTR ION N0. 8625 EXTERi OR EP?VEI.OPE A%,IERliGE ? ? , ?U CQMPUi'A"(' i ON ??.. . R: Oi,thlE? S I T£ /1DDRESS : ? 11,i14;/7 CONTRAC70 R: DAT E : PNONE :.???'J. D£TERMIr1E VlQRK IPiG SOUARE FdOTAGE OF EACH: 1. TOTAL EXPOSED 4JALL AREA........ '! _ sq ft x 'iuii ./? ¦ ,.'??Cl, _Jr . ? 2. 70TAL ROOF/CEILING AREA,....... s ft x slUll . -.. q ?.... y. ?.._ y?. ???r..?.? TOTAL EXPOSED 1JALl AREA CALCULATIhNS; ' Total exposed wa11 - area above fioor........ ,,.-9??; Sq ft . a) 7ota1 wall window area: ' i?=,, l.i.., 9lazed . ... . sq ft x iiuii ' ' _ glazed....., sq ft x JIUII ? ...-_.r.?.._... b) Total door area ..... ..., . ?4?rO sq ft x "Ulf ' , •?.7 ? ,' , , c) • Total sl iding glass door a.rea:' \ 7 6C, ---- g 1 a ze d.:.. s q f t -x , IU!l qlazed..,..?. sq ft x "U`' ? --- a -. . -- d) 7o t a l f f rep l a ce wa 11 a rea ?------- -" s q f t x ''U" J ? - n ? . • e) Total wall framing area • ---- (Averaqe ] 09;) . . . . . . . . . . . ' ,J Sq ft x iiui, ??32?- ' f) Total net walt area above ? floor (insulated)....... sq ft x "U" ?C?r,''?r' ,? ??D,?•? 9) Total rim Joist.area, ,,.. Sq ft x liuii Ll ,..? . .. 1 . M?? Total foundation ' . area (Exposed) .......... sq. ft , h) Totai foundatton window area . ............ IG sq fC x ??U" t} Tota 1 net founcla t i on ' a rea above c}r`adeti ? . . . . ? : •?i' o sq f t x r?U" Vo 3 ' , T07AL,a) Chru t) If'ite . S.fi.C. m ?3 is the same as, or less Sect(on 6006 (c) 2 than item fl, yo u have met t • he intent of . . f?. TOTAL EXPOSED RAQF/CE i L! NG CALCULl171 QtaS : , `• Total exposed . , ' raof/cei l ing area....... l -T ? sq ft 7ota} skyl taht area....... Sq ft x 14ull k) Total roof/ceillnq framinq ?. . area (Avera4e 109;) . . . . . '/../r_ sq ft x "U" t) 7otal net insutated roof/ceilin9 area....... sq ft x?iui 1 6? . 1"OYAL thru i ): if total oF "Jj ts the same as, or less than P2, you have meC the intent of , S. a. C. Sect i on 6606 (c) ]. • ,..• ;, ?a' . ,,,. •>;:;:,'??, , y. . . , . , •,. . . ,. . . .,, , • ... •' _ . ,, • ' _. . ALTERFaATE DU ! LQ I P!G ENVEL.OPE DES I GN • To utilize the total envelope system method,.the values established by the sum ot ttems #3 and #4 shali not be greater than the sum of items Nl and #2. .. ` 516 " '-3T + 7? -:2 1"?i ¢ ??? ('7•??? //. .. • . . w?+ . . . .. . . . . . . . w __ . . . . . . CE R7 I F! C A T I 01•1 i hereby certify that 1 have calcuiated the "U" factors and "R" values hereln ancl tliat the builcllnci here clescrihcrl meets or exceecls the State of Minnesota Ener4y Conservation Act. , ,. . j? ` ; . /!?/ ???i; ??- • • Slqnature ? . .. . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . , . . . r ? ?..?---?- r AI R. FLOw VENTED . ..r ?.11??.'. I i'.111 j I Ili. . f . . . ,. . r,?._---.?.?.... . . . CCILiII('?' SECTlOI1 (l11SUlATEp); . ) intcrior air ftlm n.h1, ? . 2 7 ? J'/:>, ? ?%.? ?,? • ?. (L/r?i?( <i(;? C}[) ? 3 G?, j+ Cxterior a i r film.'(sttll) TOTAL R 11 °. 1/R -= ?. ?5 CE1l,lNG FRAMING SECTI.ON; ?•:J 1 InCerlor airfilm r• ? . ?'.?: '?7 .? ? _.????/1 '.r ,{•^,(?.. ' . . . a 'J?f . . „ T VENTED .?.i C?i?. • ? . 14 . Interior air fi )m s t i 11 q, 1: i nches sof t woT `. . Z,1, ;,34- . .. . : TOTAL' R U=1/Re??f}A7. . CEILItdG SEr,Tlorl (IrlsRATE p) : : ? , , ,' •. . lnterior ai r fi'im . n.61 2 •----- 3 . : Exterior'air, fllm sti11 tl. 1 •,? TQTAI R ._ .._.` U ? 11R , . .?... CEILIN, FRAMIPlr, SECTIOhl: ` l- interior air film 0.61 . ' z . . 3 f:xterior air filrn sti}1 t1. 5 inches.soft wood TOTIIL R = . U= 1/R- , ..._.;._. ? . , • 1 Ins ide ai r f i lm n.At' 2 3 . 5 Outsicle air film n,17 ? . . . TOT/ll R ? ? . . . .. . . ?? . .. . . . . . : M?. ? . ? ? ..•lllS l (<l)f ,r I ()P! (Z U1L.l11: -4 WALL RnKiric sECTIoN: ? Interior air film 2 i, -. /: - %' 3 i nches sof ti•rood, ? - . fj??. .? . .`7 /??i'.-:'•r" .f.. ['j 0.17 A Exterior ai r f i lm ? ,. ..._..? ? ? ?U? ? ?/R ¦??????1/>,,,i?. - , r----- • a1Ht,L SECTl OP! ( I NSULATE.Q) • ? ?. Interior air film?' ? ( 3 l,i; !{ •?"/ , , ? ------------- - ? i '??; ? Exterior ai?r f i lm ; TOTAL ?,R: . U I/R , . RIM JOIST SECTION: n,?R ., 1 lnterior a1r film' ? 2 '> %::r /? r,2 ??r T.!'r /_ • : f 3• l_? C? . ? . -_ \? . ..J. .J..-, ?i.,l; ?'iIC/J . ? "/•?Yi! . "'' 7 ? ? ----( fi, E x t e r i o r- a i r f 11 m ? 0,17 : 'fOTAL R ¢ ?,!?'?`_l. U 1/R 4 , ' FOUNDAT I Ot! SECT I ON : ? nA8 •? • ---{? Interior air film ? 2 ,?;-•. -.-r ? /,.:? '?" ?-'t •iy r' /*`?,?%i? .C? a; 4 FxtPrior air film ? tt?17 a? r; r,???r ?Aj,!'? ?c•` h , TQTAL R = ; W M7 . v= 1/R- S '------ SLAf3 Otd G RADE • . . . .. •r? •.? • ? -?? "?' ?? ? Q• ?. . . ? ? ? ? ? ?? - ? . ? •( ?? . ; ? ) ':4, ', . . ? ?? ?? •-` f y? ? /1. 10'` ?• ? .! 1 Q . , . ? ?; ? . : ,' C? b A ?i •',, ; ? ? • al ? « ?:, ? • . ? , `-? . . ? . ??, ? . a i,? ? ? ;,'.. ?; • ? ,?? .. . , ;• -- - v •'? ? ( ?????fl, ? . Q ` .? ` / ??` •1 t / // ? •(I •??. I• ?..? ? / ? ? ? ..•:. 1 ,.. .., ' • `?yI ? ? • , ? ',/ ?'Y?t . ? . . . . ' . '? ? . ?1 • ?',•:,; ? ? ? ' ?? ? ' ? ,•? `I t ? r ??.' ? ? I , • 41 l •[? ? ?? ?'1 ? • ? . ? ? ? ' ' ? ? \ ? / • ? ?: , ?? ? '. ? ? • . 1 . ' 1 ? U • ' ,Q ? ? ? ?. , r ? .V . + ,. ? •? , Clty OF 3830 PILOT KIVOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EA6AN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 May 28, 1986 MR ED DANNECKER 4154 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Lots 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block 7, Hilltop Estates Backyard Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Dannecker: I am in receipt of your letter of May 13 wherein problems associated with draining the rear yard above-referenced lots. In researching our files, I this problem has previously been identified prior to the houses on Lots 14 and 15 with a recommended prepared by james R. Hill, Znc., on September 22, enclosed for your information. On April 28 of this year, ou Peterson, responded to similar 4150 BlueAerry Circle (Lot ].Fl enclosed for your information.1`? BEA BLOM9UIST Mavor iHOnnAS EGAiv JAMES A SMtiH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER f.:ou?cii MemUers THOMAS HEDGES city ndm?imaAOr EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CiN ?erlc you identified areas of the have found that construction of solution being 1983, which is r Chief Building Official, Mr. Dale concern raised by Mr. Steve Reed, of ). A copy of that letter is also The existing low area along these corimon lot lines was not a major drainage concern in consideration of developing the overall subdivision, Hilltop Estates. Several similar type drainage situations are usually resolved through proper site planning and yard landscaping by the individual builders of each lot. Unfortunately, when Lot 16 was developed, the walkout elevation of that house was placed too low to allow adequate fill to be placed in the downstream lots (14 and 15) to ensure minimum surface flow out to Blueberry Circle. After inspecting the site during the early morning hours of May 21, I do not feel you will have a severe problem. :iowever, the only way to be totally sure would be the installation of a gravity storm sewer system as referenced in your letter. However, with no other storm sewer facilities in the immediate vicinity, this type of installation would involve considezable expense ($10,000 +). The financing of similar type public improvements is usually achieved through special assessnents against benefitted properties. In this case, they would be the five lots referenced above. In order for the Council to consider the expenditure of dollars and the subsequent assessment to private property or expenditure of public funds to finance this project, it would require the petition of at THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNIIY MR ED DANNECKER MAY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 ?, .. ., s ?? ' •'? least two of the five property owners to initiate a feasibility report. Upon completion of this report, a formal public hearing would be held at which time the Council would hope that more than 51$ of the affected property owners would support such a project. In order to initiate this process, I have enclosed a copy of the Cit-y's standard petition form which must be submitted to the Council before any formal study can be initiated beyond what has been performed to date by the d2veloper's engineer. Until there has been sufficient support for this public improvement, the resolution of this problem remains one to be resolved between the affected property owners, their builders and/or developer. Sincerely, ?homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Vlorks TAC/jj cc: Dale Peterson, Chief Building Official Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation Jim Hill, James R. Hill, Inc. Enclosure RECEjV'? 0 Ger-? /3tx 7 'Alj d'arap ??r4 Mr. Thomas Colbert 5_13-86 Eagan City Offices 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55123 Dear Mr. Colbert, , I currently have excess ponding of rainwater at the rear of my lot. The water is runoff from.a number of adjacent lots which has resulted in significant accumulation. The size oP the pond is'approximately 70 by , 20 by 3 feet deep. - I have a number oP concerns about the ponding. ' 1)Foremost is safety. There are many children in the neighborhood. The pond poses a tiigh potential of an accidental drowning. On one occurance earlier this year, a 7 year old boy became stuck in the pond because of the suction of the mud and required assistance to get out. 2)Towards the end of April,a second pond developed posing a threat to m9 home and my neighbors. The water levels are such that water could anter through the basement level windowa. f ? 3}A storm pipe was in`stalled to drain water from the ponding area to the street. The elevation of the pipe is such that it is ineffective. I am convieed that my baek yard will be submersed before the pipe would be utilized. There needs to be an arrangement to allow for proper drainage. I understand there are two alternate grading plans on file, neither of w.hich have been implemented at this time. I do not have confidence tha't either of the plans will provide a total,long lasting solution, I request the city of Eagan conduct a Peasibility study on the placement of a storm sewer in the area of the ponding to resolve the problem. There are a number of factors that limit the number of alternatives. The storm sewer will provide the best results. 4 prompt response from the city ma-y be necessary to prevent dama.ge from flooding. Sincerely, 'CC : Dan Osborn Steve Reed Ed Darinecker 4154 Blueberry Circle . Phone W-921-1851 , x-452-975'1 , , .;, . L/ s? e7 4 . ???r ? . oF eagan 3830 PILpT KN08 ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PNONE: (612) 454-8100 BEA BLOMQUISf Movor THOMEIS EGAN • JAMES A. SMtiH VIC EILISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Mempen THOMAS NEDGES Ciry lwmtrusuoro. EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE GN Ciedc April 28, 1986 MR STEVE REED 4150 BLUEBERRY CIR EAGAN, MN 55123 RE: DRAINIGE OF L 14, 15 & 16, B 79 HII,LTOP ESTATES. Dear Mr. Reed: In response to your phone eall of April 18, wherein you indicated at that time you did not want water standing on your property nor did you want any trees removed for filling, I am enclosing a copy of the transmittal from the Engineer, Mr. James Hill, to the developers of Hilltop Estates, Sienna Corporation, with proposed solutions to the drainage problem of the above lots. The proposed solutions to the drainage concerns were diseussed with you at the time eonstruction was started on your home in September of 1984. At that time, Sunshine Construction and you agreed to fill the rear yards and in p2ace of the drainage swale use a buried drainage pipe which was done. If presently you do not want the rear yard filled and the trees removed, you have two alternatives left - the proposed wet well or ponding in your rear yard. Sincerely, Dale S. Peterson Chief Building Official DSP/js CC: Craig Knudsen - City Engineering Technician Sienna Corporation Sunshine Construction THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNITY James ? Ri iil ? ? s? a?.,. ? r'; N;1? ti s Oc-tober. 6, 1983 Mr. Dale Peterson Building Inspector 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 w n K ? RE: LOT?,? 14 AND ?.5' BLOCK 7`?? ?F{ I LLTbP ' ESTAT;ES? Dear Mr. Peterson: At the request of Sienna Corporation, we have taken field e7evations on Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 7 to determine existing conditions for the purpose of suggesting methods of draining the rear yards of said lots. 14e have attached a plan with elevations and suggestions for your review and for assistance to the builder when constructing homes on Lots 14 and' 15. You will note that the existing rear yard grade of the home on Lot 16 is 892.6 which,along with the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15, should drain to the curb on Blueberry Circle which is at an elevation of 891.9. Two methods are availab7e: One: Fill the rear yards af Lots 14 and 15 so that a drainage swale can be maintained from Lot 16 thru Lot 15 and then to the street: This wi11 require up to six feet of fill in the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 and some filling on Lot 16; the swa7e wi11 only be a 0.3'+ percent grade because of the existing house grade on Lot 16. The drainage swale shown across the corner of Lot 14 and thru Lot 15 wiT1 have to be provided with an easement. Two: A second method for drainage would be to not fill the rear yards, let water pond, provide for an emergency overflow swale as shown on the attached drawings,'and construct a"wet well" that may or may not slowly drain the ponding area. One or two soil borings should be required to determine if and at what depth a sandy stratum can be found. The effectiveness of the "wet well" will depend on the type of soiT, perkolation, and mainte- nance. 8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH • BLOOMlNGTON • MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-884-3029 ? ;?. . ,_.. ??.? ???4?.. ?? ,?;,.? .}•???:.?.,. i j Mr. Dale Peterson ? RE: LOTS 14 AND 15, BtOCK 7 ? ; HILLTOP ESTATES ? October 6,:1983 Pa9e 2 The emergency swale must be constructed and maintained so.that homes are not flooded. The swale must have an easement across Lat 14. In either method, Lot 15 must - provide for (in aeed) drainage of adjacent 1ots. Sincere7y, - JAh1ES R. HILL, INC. James R. Hill , JRH/sh Enclosure cc: Sienna Bob Rosene Loren Spande ? F-% 1 1•11 • ? lnc. ? i ? JAG:?? jc? ?r?A?n11hx C-- @200 tlur?bolclt Avc SU . 985 X891a,? Bloomi;i0;un, MN S:i43j •(' 1( ?'? ? ? / / 1 Bqi,S 89'?,9 q?2 •3 ?, I ? 1^ ? • ly ' a f .? ? pg7,7 . ? -r0 G1??140 ? 89s.4 ? F68q,1 ? 6yl,`I w?l?f?L?' 867.6 ?f : / r?\" ,ip,,,,,,???'?J?Q.L X 94s 2 I r? B7t,?,? 815•? ?11A "QB ?''"'?,? 910.1 I ly? LeVto % ? • ?? ? ? tx 7 ? ?15?'!N? ??Z y 9f,,, 8.?, vusF , T ? ra , w ?? C?? ?yt ios:s ? 4iL r ?' . . . / a? ? ?5? ? ?- ?d?fr?L ?`"/?? ?/!-,???VCj' , /LQ S?'' ,dvj/? yftj?r C,? 7.5 ? ?? ??tAlnU h? B1 3.Y p ,ppr ? 1 ?? ?(J ?? ,t 98,? 2 //1/G1' ,? i 1 O r x9 ? s93q gyq.9 ??2•3 a x ? ELV I?"i \ ? p8S(P? w J F689 x (?1 Cor?l'TG uc-i 64,At,.F. p9?,c lt x9+s2 ??P 9tz,? r Bi1p' "gBYb ? ? Bfo•7 812 ,o x s9a,? ??;?T 00 'v ? J,`l'...:;; 3i. i;1Ll,lj;t;. 8200 Hum6oldl qve BloomiriSo gton, MN 55431 ??oe e IY /?(? '? 9y17r +?na ? ?, ' ? 4?'a> l; Q I 8 k , AousE 810 1 = ?I -V. Z 2- . 2, aLL 7c . •?92 - ?? ??ZD?' ? / ? ? `? ? o? Q`? ?jT-C ? ? ???-v r???? ??$•83? 9 , 2?3 ? p.LriA1?.11+1?G' ??"?. ,/? ? 9°.w ? ?UV ? x ? ? b93 q A 4 89i,S' g9'?,9 yi2•3 ? a !11 ps7,7 X B+S. t I f,? Btt,?Te S1L? ?81to. ,,88 810•7 ? ?Q x811.o jtlt7Ac;UQL„ '`. '?C1STIkIC C. k,q ?` ?Ea-r'» /T . ? Ic /QO ?f 1 ? 0 5o X I ov =.5P 4'6 ?- t ysoo x 82C3 Humboidt,-y., 91ooc,nugton. ? ACr.- lGkr' ? ; ?• ? ? ? ? s I lames R. July 21, 1986 Mr. Rodnep D. Hardy Sienna Corporation 4940 Viking Drive Suite 608 . Minneapolis, MN 55435 RECElVEO vU? 2 on IS80 RE: HILLTOP ESTATES LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCR 7- DRAINAGE CONCERNS Dear Mr. Hardy; At your request, we have reviewed the recent soils report by GME and our field notes taken in June of 1986. Based on this information, we feel there are four alternatives to reduce the drainage problem within the rear of lots 14, 15 and 16. 1.) Fill the low lying area to a suitable elevation such that the runoff flows to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the existing vegetation. This alternative was pre- viouslp proposed in our letter of October 6, 1983 to Dale Peterson, City Building Inspector. 2.) Fill the low lying area within lot 15 onlq to a . suitable elevation such that the runoff flows into the 12" P.V.C. installed bp the builder. The fill required would range between 0.5' to 1.5' deep. ; This would require a minimal amount of disruption to the existing vegetation. Also, a wet well would be required at the outlet of the pipe in the front yard of lot 14. Per the soils report, a wet well can be constructed in the area of the outlet. As a backup to the wet well, a provision should be included to discharge additional water to Blueberry Circle. See attached for schedule of estimated construction costs. 3.) Construct a catch basin and sump pump system near - the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. The . surface water would drain into the catch basin, at ?' - which time the sump pump would be activated to pump the water via the existing drain pipe. A wet well as described in alternative #2, would also be required in the front pard of lot 14. See attached • • ill, inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SQUTH • BLOOMINGTON • MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-8843029 t ! schedule for estimated construction costs. The issues to be resolved with this solution are as , follows. 1) ownership and maintenance costs of pump? 2) variation of weather conditions - the pump must be removed during the winter season. (pump wt. = 110 lbs) 3) the pump must be wired to a house - who pays electrical costs? or how shared? 4) what happens if electricitp goes out? 4.) Install a catch basin in the low lying area and run the storm sewer line into the existing city storm sewer system under a public improvement project. See attached plan and schedule of costs. Given the four alternatives, we would recommend alter- native number 4 as the best solution to the drainage concern. However because of the high cost to each of the three benefitting lots, we feel that alternative number 2 would be the next best. Within all of the alternatives, ponding map still occur depending on the duration and intensity of a storm. This is because the drain pipe or sewer system can only handle so much water at a given time. Also, there is only approximately 1.5'+ from the low lying area to the walkout elevation of lot 16 before flooding would occur. If you have any questions or require further information with regard to this matte'r, please advise. _ Sincerely, JAMES R. HILL, INC. . 6?eter A. Bishop, E. Vice President cc: Tom Colbert - City of Eagan Dale Peterson - City of Eagan Attachments -0, a 4 ?,. 17 1 J:1 I:.,? ?-. a Jdt I 1CJ I\. n i i i, 11 iL. ? ? HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 2 Estimated Construction Costs Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum 600.00 (off site disposal) Barrow material 80 cu.yd. @ 5.00/cu.yd. 400.00 to fill hole Restoration - Sodding 220 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 440.00 Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00 on Lot 14 $2,640.00 + 10% Contingencies 260.00 Total Estimated Construction Casts $2,900.00 - ? . " . . LJ . I i ...? ?. Jcu I 1Cz) ix. I I i i i, u i%.. ? f ' HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 3 Estimated Construction Costs Catch Basin Sump . Lump Sum $ 1,125.00 (with discharge pipe) Pump & High Level Lump Sum 3,610.00 Controls (See attached details) Electrical Wiring Lump Sum 425.00 Restoration - Sodding 150 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 300.00 Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00 on Lot 14 $ 6,660.00 + 10% Contingencies 660.00 Total Estimated $ 7,720.00 Construction Costs ? . . ". i i ...... Jdl I ICJ 1\. I III1/ 11 Il.. HILLTOP ESTATES B`?E o`??_ KN WZ a ..1 13 12 s? 14 , sPROPOSED EE OE?'AIL CB 15 , m F o RRY ?c ?s \ N . 11. 16 NO SCALE 17 -? BEEHIVE CASTING ;• ? ,ELECTRICAL CONNECTION ' --DISCHARGE LINE T0 EXISTING ; 12" bRAIP! PIPE _ : : . .' SUMP PUMP ? • • ? : ?. '. i . : f • ; . PROPOSED CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE NO. 3' HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 4 The third alternative'as mentioned in the GME Consultants, Inc. report dated June 27, 1986 is to petition the City of Eagan for a storm sewer system to terminate with a catch basin being installed in the rear yard area between Lot 14 and 15. The nearest storm sewer exists at the intersection of Diffley Road and Blueberry Lane which would require approximately 640 L.F. of pipe and 3 structures together with street, boulevard, and driveway restoration. (See Attached) The estimated total cost for this storm sewer system is approximately $28,168.00 based on the following estimated quantities. 12" R.C.P. CL5 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD MANHOLE 0'-8' DEEP STANDARD CATCH BASIN RESTORATION OF BOULEVARDS STREET RESTORATION DRIVEWAY RESTORATION 640 L.F. @ 23.00/L.F. 1,000.00 900.00 $20,120.00 2,012.00 6,036.00 $28,168.00 2 EA. @ 800.00 EA. 1 EA. @ 850.00 EA. 525 S.Y. @ 2.00/S.Y. LUMP SUM 3 EA. @ 300.00 EA. + 10% Contingencies + 30% City Engineering & Administrative Costs Total Estimated Costs Cost Per Lot $ 9,389.00 (assuming 3 benefitting lots) ? .. Cost Per Lot $ 5,633.00 (assuming 5 benefitting lots) . . ?.. .,.,•. .. r. n U. ? ? ..? r• )ar i iCD IX. 1 11111 11 lk.,. I _l '? .v ... . . -?d6? L'] ., Z _ , . _ n 6i v .,, n'?_? ? --__ ?0_ ? --- -•- - ?.., , _ : . C ) • ,?? de' 4 0- ?? m '? h _? ?u ? O `.? ?S9os92 ?' ? .- 46g4?3s„49 tiry ? OD N ao __ 122 g3 -^ 2? 9 cn ? m u+o o? • ?w ?o gERR? i^' 7g051,52E ? a ' 13E m " 3 °' 8 L. 0 ? o?s•z= w'?, m N ` 49.71 2 ? ? ?'c _ N 01?R? ? ? ?? ?a=16°29'29', m a 89021 Q, ` ? o m'° , m N 69 S3o ,i 24 R - 09 ?, C? ` ? N oo'(3 •c?3 0; z, 9 SSB3 `?4•1,tq T? ?,??' N ?o?- ,b6a9 0 0•o a_ D3o?0 ? J ,? - TZa3g2o ' tn ? o?m? Qo° ? ooti .0 111.eW BLUEBERRY N n 02 , N 0 D.6o47=1T-?_ bp??p°\o ryo ?? ry ? 1? A1? : y ? W O? o f0 , v i?r" 192 63 Q`(0 <D i - ? o KN ? ,, _i2a.oi ;_ ??,.g7--- -. ,. ° 1 m N. s?p /s 44. _<v-S89°22'53"E - 98.38 '? ? 0 O pti _? Q• N M ? %=93°57'20?? %S'? i9 N A i 17 0 21 v' °M o o ? ° 13 : ? ro ? 12 A. m ,n to ? „?•.O .:/ = s Om , Q n7 ti S?o o ' 18 0 /62 q4s,? a+M ? Io -- --130.Op _ - i ?L 205.75 - S 87°37'37"E _ 0 S83c4107 . "E - -; ,- . 90.00 ' I ? S? e3?39., ?? ' ?`'•S3 , • N o ° o? . F -AT ? 3 14 o m ?. 1 ' ? ' ? ' 3p v pp O?o I '\ J5 . . .?t/ O ? oo ?y3 ? 9C' `G ?h?0 ?O , R, $QOO\ ' 16 M SO jfC ?SS o?CO fL Oa n xSAO 9?SS2Os-o ! ??:..25?0 p•?:b4;72. ? •. c?o 3;W F,? 2, R3• ? '? a? . ' 3O ??,? .,/ c?'? ;-' v, ? O R; ?/ ?3 g9•• ?O 23'3 ?6 0 6 ? F- ? i Z ?, p 20 • B9 / n' o° S?0O- 3? 60,rob p?P?6 •? ? 4j,?.'??01 ? ? C/ ?9s ? ?Q ? %? .? pFtp' ? • , rL6 ? Q`/O 2000 0 ,?> s69 , ! o °? 3?? F as , t. N5 ` ? 21 o /° ss?o 17 S°O 0 t' O /4, ,?? `?v • I G; '?,; 52. g4 ?.. Y . 3t ai2j ?/SF h? E! f g o p F 3j39Oy544 /?? 4=50°33'20„ a Fo? ?? 69? ' t ?e' .' . 2 Z cr (L -") 32 >0 ? 22• ? • ? / -40 22 STOa4 ' o : h- rp 4j • o _ ? 9? _. cV n o0 0 ;,3 ?A' ? ? o j o ? ? a• h • S?, w ?Y !o_ `?° '°? °? , l0 c ?l 0 V A. p,s 9g N a3 ? ?o o - ? .7 2 a o - S89°30'20"E -' 00'.o ; -Ng ?34 ^- o 5 3f"yy -- N v I18.91 20 od' ?y0 0? o N`?- ?o ? z Ic v v; ,? - N ?l cv rO p ? N?y? Do 1 3 W y N? .? o An o o.? o _ M vf 3c2p,,• _ j? io lo °' ? o ?? N 0 n? O cs?- ? O ? ? t;; ? , , I V M O 23 ? ? ? v o e m ? N0 o r. N= ? 19 O = • - ? '- - 130 0 ' a ' 30 --- - - 179.63 - - ' ?0? - 99.28 -- I- - - - -- 101.12- - ? W ? ? ?.. J. o J ,y W T EX15i11VC. 0 „ 5To1?M 6?vFR o; AND N O. 30 ° r ^, ? o Z 509,75 --- F: D ..U 60•w ' IC, C t r IV I't /? C. ..? • ` ? .. , 1 ?. 1.. SNEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS L . _Ti-. .. ? . .. . r GME CONSULTANTS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2083 East Center Circle / Minneapolis. MN 55441 / 612/559-1859 June 27, 1986 Sienna Corporation ' 4940 Viking Drive, Suite 608 Edina, Minnesota 55435 Attention: Mr. Rod Hardy GME Project No. 1073 RE: Subsurface exploration for proposed back yard drainage area at Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 7 of Hilltop Estates in Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen: As authorized by you on June 11, 1986, we have completed this subsurface exploration for the proposed back yard drainage area. Enclosed please find the results of our exploration and the soil report which we have prepared. Two copies of this ?report have , been sent to the above address. Two copies have been sent to Mr. Harold Bohanon of James R. Hill, Inc. _ INTRODUCTION K . ?. Single £amily dwellings have recently been constructed at the three subject lots in the Hilltop Estates Subdivision. Groundwater has been observed ponded on the surface in the rear yards these lots during recent rainy periods. It is also our understanding that prior to the development of the subdivision, this area was a naturally-occurring drainage swale and ponding ?. area. In an attempt to eliminate the water from ponding on the surface, a storm drain about 12 inches in diameter was installed from the rear yard area near the property line dividing Lots 14 GEOTECHNICAL o MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS WILLIAM C. KWASNY. P.E. THOMAS P. VENEMA, P.E. WILUAM E. BLOEMENDAL. E.I.T. l Mr. Rod Hardy 2 June 27, 1986 and 15. This drain daylights in the front yard area of Lot' 14. Due to the existing topography, this drain was not capable of dewatering- the area. It is now proposed to undertake remedial measures which would reduce or eliminate water ponding on the surface. The purpose of this report is to describe the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration; to review and evaluate these conditions with respect to the proposed project; and to present recommendations for feasible methods of reducing the possibility of water ponding on the surfaces of the rear yards. FIELD EXPLORATION/LABORATORY TESTING Two borings were drilled for this project as shown on the enclosed Soil Boring Location Diagram. The number and locations of the - borings were chosen by GME Consultants, Inc. and James R. Hill, Inc. during a site meeting on June 9, 1986. The borings were laid out in the field by the GME drill crew. Ground surface elevations at the borings were determined by GME, referenced to the elevation of the i.nvert of the existing drain. The elevations of the borings are shown at the top of the respective logp (NVGD Datum). The borings were drilled with a Mobile B-24 rig. Solid stem augers were used to advance the borings fu11 depth. The soil samples were obtained by the split barrel in accordance with ASTM: D 1586. During sampling, the Standard Penetration Values GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 3 June 27, 1986 (N-values, blows per foot) were recorded. These N-values are shown on the respective boring logs. The recovered soil samples were preliminarily classified in the field, sealed in glass jars. to prevent moisture loss, and returned to our laboratory for examination and classification by a Soil Engineer. Groundwater levels were noted in the borings during and after completion of the field operations. These water levels are shown on the respective logs. A dis`cussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings is included under the Site Conditions section of this report. The laboratory testing program consisted of a Soil Engineer examining each sample to determine the major and minor soil components, while also noting the color, degree of saturation, and any lenses or seams found in the samples. The soils were visually/manually classified on the basis of texture and plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The letter symbol in parentheses following the written description on the logs is the estimated group symbol based on the USCS. A chart describing the properties of the groups under this system is included in the Appendix of this report. ' - The Engineer grouped the soils by type into the strata shown on w the logs. The stratification lines shown on the logs are approximate; insitu, the transition between soil types may be gradual or abrupt in both the horizontal and vertical directions. GMP rnmcill Te11iTS INC_ t . Mr. Rod Aardy 4 June 27, 1986 Particle size analysis of soils representative of the most granular soil strata observed in each of the borings were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM: D 422. As a part of the testing program, laboratory moisture contents were determined in accor.dance with ASTM: D 2216. The laboratory moisture content results are shown on the appropriate boring logs and on the sieve analysis sheets. Groundwater levels were noted in th`e borings during and after completion of the drilling operations. The recorded water levels are shown in the lower left corner of the respective boring logs. A discussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings in included under the Site Conditions section of this report. We will retain the soil samples remaining after testing for 30 days after the date of this report. If you wish to have the samples retained beyond this time, we ask that you please advise us; otherwise, the samples will be discarded. SITE CONDITIONS Topography/Surface Features The ponding area generally runs in a southwest to northeast direction from the center of Lot 16 to the rear of Lot 14. The` topography of this area varies from a high elevation of ? approximately 893 feet to 894 feet adjacent to the rear of the houses, to a low of approximately 889 feet near the property line dividing Lots 14 and 15. This area is covered with dense - GMF f`tllUeul TaNTS. INC_ , Mr. Rod Hardy 5 June 27, 1986 vegetation varying from brush to large mature trees. Boring 1 was drilled in the lowlying rear yard area. The inlet of an approximately 12 inch diameter drain pipe is located in the rear yard area. The drain runs in a generally northwesterly direction towards Blueberry Circle and then in a northeasterly direction to the front yard area of Lot 14 near tlie intersection of Blueberry Circle and Blueberry Lane. Boring 2 was drilled near the outfall of the drain. The vegetation in this immediate area is sparse and includes-low grasses. Soil Conditions The soil conditions found in the borings are shown on the respective logs. The soil conditions vary at the two boring locations. At boring 1, the surface is covered with approximately 2.5 of dark brown silty fine to medium sand and clayey sand fill. The fill contains trace roots and seams of black fine sandy silt. Underlying the fill and extending to the termination depth of the boring at 20 feet, occur highly stratified soils. These stratified soils include clayey silt, sandy silt, clayey sands, silty sand, and sandy clay.' The observed seams-or lenses vary in thickness from less than 0:.5 feet to nearly 7 feet in thickness. The N-values within the naturally-occurring non-organic soils at boring 1 varied from 2 to 43 blows per foot, generally increasing with depth. The N-values indicate that these soils increased from soft GMF rnluCitITANTS_ INC Mr. Rod Hardy 6 June 27, 1986 or loose at shallow depth5 to dense or hard at greater depth. Based on visual observations in the laboratory, particle size analysis testing were run on the two predominant granular soil types for use in estimation of the permeability of these soils. The percent passing the #200 sieve, which is the division between coarse and fine grained soils, vary from approximately 29% to 34%. The moisture content of these `same samples varied from approximately 15% to 17$. At boring 2, the soils were slightly less stratified. At that location, the upper most approximately 7 feet consisted of black and dark brown stratified silty fine to coarse sand and sandy silt with trace organic content. This upper most 7 feet is probably fill. Below a depth of 7 feet, the predominant soil type was fine to coarse sand and silty sand with layers of sandy silt. - The Standard Penetration Test Resistancies within the naturally- occurring sandy soils varied from 6 to 24 blows per foot indicative of a loose to medium dense condition. Based on laboratory particle size analysis tests, the silt and clay content of the sandy soils at this site varied from approximately 6$ to . 18$. Thus, the_ granular soils at boring 2 contain less fines (particles smaller than the #200 sieve) than those soils encountered at boring 1. GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Rod Hardy 7 June 27, 1986 Groundwater Conditions Free groundwater was encountered in each of the two borings during our relatively brief period of observation. At boring 1, the groundwater was observed at a depth of 2 feet while drilling. At • the conclusion of drilling, the water was at 3 feet from the: surface. At boring 2, located in the front yard area, minor seepage was observed at a depth of 9 feet while drilling. The borehole was dry upon completion of t-he drilling and approximately 2 hours later. Laboratory soil moisture content tests results varied from approximately 15% to 17$ at boring 1, and from approximately 3% to 9$ at boring 2. Based on the available data, it can be seen that the groundwater is at shallower depths and the soils in a wetter condition at boring 1 than at boring 2. , The groundwater levels will vary seasonally and annually, depending upon local amounts of precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff, infiltration, and for other reasons. Excavations extending just a few feet below the existing ground surface in the rear yard area would likely encounter groundwater infiltration. The quantity of such infiltration would likely be substantial. Excavation near the out fall of the existing drain pipe would encounter less groundwater. ? _ GMOCnwcturnwre lmr_. Mr. Rod Hardy 8 June 27, 1986 REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS We understand that the site becomes ponded with water during times of heavy rainfall. A preliminary proposal was presented by others, to reduce or eliminate the ponding of surface water in this area was to install a"wet well." Briefly described, a wet well includes an excavation at the site, to be backfilled with highly permeable granular soils. The surface water would infiltrate the granular soils and would then be disp`ersed into the natural soils. Thus, the surface waters would be allowed to discharge into the soils at depth. J The soil and groundwater conditions at this site do not appear to be suitable_for construction of a wet well. Suitable naturally- occurring conditions would include highly permeable granular soils and a groundwater level at substantial depth. The soils at boring 1 in the rear yards are stratified and include highly impermeable layers of silt, clay, and silty and clayey sands. Laboratory sieve analysis test results for the granular soils indicate the inclusion of approximately 30% or more silt and clay. We estimate that the permeability of the granular soils at that location to be approximately 1 x 10 -6 cm/sec or less. For a design of a wet well, it is also beneficial to have a groundwater table which is-relatively deep. At this site, the ? groundwater was encountered at a very shallow depth on the order of 2 feet. Such a high existing groundwater table would cause a mounding condition with the introduction of water from a wet well. GME rn111aooi7eN7s_ INC_ Mr. Rod Hardy 9 June 27, 1986 That is, as new water were introduced through the wet well, rather than being quickly dispersed laterally into the existing soils, a rise in the groundwater (mounding) would occur which would take extended periods of time to disperse. This wuld effectively reduce or eliminate infiltration. The soil conditions at the outfall of the existing drain in the front yard of Lot 14, are somewhat better suited for construction of a wet well. The granular soils a`t that location contain less silt and clay content, on the order of 18% at a depth of 6 to 12 feet and approximately 6$ between the depths of 16 feet and 20 feet. The deeper sand stratum would be suitable for the design of a wet well. However, these soils are at substantial depth and wet well construction could be costly. Also, groundwater infiltration was encountered at a depth of 9 feet at this location.- This relatively shallow groundwater table would reduce the efficiency.- of the wet we11. • We recommend that the proposed wet well not be built in the rear yard area. It is our opinion that three alternatives exist to the proposed wet we11. The alternatives may not be as satisfactory from an asthetic and economic perspective that the. originally ? proposed wet well. Alternate No. 1 would be to fill the lowlying area to a suitable elevation such that runoff occurs by flow to Blueberry Circle. This alternative would require removal of much of the vegetation that currently occupies the rear yard. It would be possible to eMc n.,.1-.-nw-c lNe Mr. Rod Hardy 10 June 27, 1986 replant this area after the earthwork is completed. As a part of filling the rear yard area to promote surface drainage, it would be advantageous to partially grade the site to drain to the existing buried drain pipe at which point it would • flow to the front yard of Lot 14 where a wet well could be constructed. A properly designed and constructed wet well in this area could be feasible: If filling and replanting the rear yard area are not possible, as a second alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard so that the surface water drains to a location near the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. At that location, a catch basin and sump pump would be installed. The surface water would drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would be activated and pump the water via the existing drain pipe to a wet well constructed at the out fall of the drain. As a backup to the wet well in the front yard, an overflow mechanism should be included to discharge additional water to the Blueberry Circle storm sewer system. As a third, possibly more expensive alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear yard to drain to a catch basin in the rear yard as discussed in Alternate No. 2. For this alternative, rather than a sump pump removing the water, the water could be ? -- drained by gravity to a suitable discharge location. However, due to the existing topography of the area, the most suitable discharge location would likely be at some distance away, probably GME COIUCIII TANTS_ INC_ Mr. Rod Hardy 11 June 27, 1986 at Diffley Road, or to an existing storm sewer system also at some distance away. This drain system would have to cross at least 2 existing streets. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS This preliminary report has been prepared based on the soil and groundwater conditions_found in our subsurface exploration, and on the preliminary data related to us by James R. Hill, Inc. This report is intended solely for this project at the specific location discussed. The soil and groundwater conditions were determined at 2 boring locations. These conditions are pertinent only at the boring locations and under the environment existing at the time of our .. subsurface exploration. Variations in soil and gr_oundwater conditions were encountered and additional variations probably. exist that would not become apparent until construction starts. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is presented in this report with respect to the soil and groundwater conditions on this site. It is not warranted to extrapolate soil conditions between the boring locations themselves. We would be pleased to supply additional geotechnical recommendations at which t3me a specific design is considered.- We ap'preciate the opportunity to be of service to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to GME CONSULTANTS, iNC. ? - • . l ? JMr. Rod Hardy 12 1 l .J ? ? .? J J J ? ? J ? ? contact us. Sincerely, GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Will' m D. Plate, P.E. Pro " ? t Eng ' eer %illiam C. Kw ,' . rincipal Engi ` APPENDIX : Soil Boring Location Diagram General Notes Soil Boring Logs Sieve Analysis Results Unified Soil Classification Chart WDP:WCK:kdk i h;reb certify thnt plan, specificntion, or wae prepa byme or nnder my dirpervisio and that I am n dulq Reo e ional Enqineer under ths law e of Mianeaota. Date Rsv o Z? - -0, GME CONSt1LTCNTS. INC June 27, 1986 I? 6e qine ? ? i '? • ?./ ' B-f 41', 890.7'; . e? C?. . ? • ' ?' ?a • • 7 ?? ' 14 ?- ?'•r?' - ? v? rt ?r W '?? • \ j J •o ' - t0 1 ' s S% P4 JIAO ? i? • ? '?j ??? ? s ? r D' $? ??? I!b, ? ?? ' ? .??__' ? •?J. 890.21 ? . _ / ?, ? ? ? - •, I • ? ??V ; , "`/?"( ? ? ? D?J r y y?i vi ? o 'IV 1? ? '' 'S * :- ..? ?` ? '#1 ;I SOIL BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM ? LQTS 14, 15 & 16; BLOCK 7 HILLTOP ESTATES EAGRN, MIPdNESOTA II SIENNA CORPORATION I6 . APPROXIMATE SCALE 0' 25' 50' GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2083 EAST CENTEA CIRCLE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 WDP WCK 1073 6-ZO-86 GENERAL NOTES DRiLLING & SAMPLING SYM80LS: , SL . SC with Liner SS . Spiit 5poon -f2/8" l.O., 2" O.D.; unless OS : Osterberg Sampler - 3" 5helby Tube otherwix noted HS : Holiow Stem Auger ST : Shelby Tube - 2" O.D., unless othervvise noted W5 : Wash Sample PA : Power Auger FT : Fish Trail DB : Diamond Bit - NX: BX: AX RB : Rcek Bit AS : Auger Sample BS . Bulk Sample JS . Jar Sample PM : Pressuremeter test - in situ VS : Vane Shear Standard "N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon, except where noted. WATER LEVEI MEASUREMENTSYMBOLS: Wl : Water Levei WCI : Wet Cave In - DCI : Dry Cave In WS : While Sampling WO : While Drilling ' BCR : Before Casing Removal ACR: After Casing Removal AB : After Boring Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence of ground water elevations must be sought. GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY: Coarse Greined or Granular Soils have more than 5096 of their dry weight retained on a ft 200 sieve; they are described as: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a#200 sieve; they are described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and sitts if they are noncohesive. In addition to gradation, granular soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place dsnsity and fine grained soils on the basis of their strength or _ consistency, and their plasticity. Major Descriptive Termis) Component (Of Components Also Percent of Of Sample Size Ran9e Present in Sample) Dry Weight Boulders Over 8 in. (200mm) Trece 1-9 Cobbles 8 in. to 3 in. little 10 - 19 (200mm to 75mm) Gravel ' 3 in. to #'4 sieve Some Zp _ 34 (75mm to 2mm) Sand #4 to #200 sieve And . 35 - 50 (2mm to.074mm) Silt Passing #'200 sieve ' (0.074mm to 0.005mm) Clay Smaller than 0.005mm CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS: RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOI_LS• Unconfined Comp. Strength, Qu, tsf Consistency N- Blows/ft.. Relative Density ' < 0.25 Very Soft 0-3 Very Loose 0.25 - 0.49 Soft 4-9 Loose 0.50 - 0.99 Medium (Firm) 10 - 29 Medium Dense 1.00 - 1.99 Stiff +U - 4o Dense 2.00 - 3.99 Very Stiff 50 - 80 Very Dense 4.00 - 8.00 Hard 80+ Extremely Dense >8.00 Very Hard ?^_nn? rnuCtft,?'31Ai?1'S _ I LOG OF BORING 1 ' PFiOJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 Hillto Estates sITE 6lueberry Lane Ea an, Minnesota OWNER Sienni or orations ARCHITECT-ENGINEER James R. Hill Inc. I'- LL U. UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT? - O 1 2 3 4 5 w ,w L 2 m j Z wa ? Y ? > w J cr Z = U a DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL F, w J UJ Q ? ? 0 m w Z) WATER CONTENT°k -? - TANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT) W ° ~ Q z ?' Q a 3 Q ¢ N SURFACE ELEVATION : 890.2 feet a w ?' °C Q ? Z S 10 20 30 ao so Dar rown si ty ine to me ium 1SS 2 ? sand, and clayey sand, trace roots, 2 5' trace seams black fine ravel I . g ; sandy silt - very loose - wet - 2SS , 4 Z ? wn clayey silt, trace fine sand - O 8 ? 3SS 61 - w -M t • , Red-brown clayey fine to coarse sand ? 5' 7 ra e ravel - 7oose - wet - SC ? 4SS . 6 Gray very fine sandy silt, trace ? 5SS 14 ? ? Red-brown clayey fine to medium sand to sand cla - loose - wet - SC-CL • 6SS 28 ? Gray-brown and red-brown stratified clayey fine to medium sand and silty seams sand rav tr l d ' y ace g e ; san , 14 to medium dense - wet- l - lo s ay e c o SC-SM• seams Cl 7SS 161 grown and ellow-brown silty fine 23 y to medium sand to sandy silt, trace d i l 34 ? - 8SS ense - mo st - clay, grave - ? (SM-ML) 9SS Dark gray fine to coarse sandy clay 43 ? trace ravel - and sand silt y , g ver stiff to hard - wet - CL-ML End of Boring at 20 feet d f th lid St A ll d S em uger use ep u o Borehole backfilled with cuttings ? WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED - - w L 4 2 feet Whi 1 e Dri 11 i n INC. GME CONSULTANTS BORING COMPLETED - - . W L I et After Dri 11 i n = f , 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 DRILLER . . W L e MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN W P APPROVED WCK . JOB# I073 SHEET 1 0'F Z The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual. LOG OF BORING 2 ' PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 sITE glueberry Lane OWNER Sienna Cor orations ARCHITECT-ENGINEER James R. Hill, Inc. H W LL ... F-: LL UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT? -Q- . 1 2 3 4 5 . W m j Z a _j > w Z i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL I- W Q J 3 O m J WATER CONTENT % BLOWS/FOOT) TI N ? a ° a?- ?? ? Q W ~ 3 h- ? ? SURFACE ELEVATION : 890.7 feet a W ?¢ ? z ( STANDARD PENETRA O 10 20 30 ao so Yellow-brown silty fine to coarse 1SS sand trace gravel - loose - moist- 5 (D , SM - fill 2SS Black and dark brown stratified 11 , silty fine to coarse sand and sandy silt trace cla ravel wood 3SS y, g , , , 4 (D roots, slightly organic - soft to ' fill iff bl SM b ? 7 st - ( -ML-OL) - pro a e 9 4SS Yellow - brown fine to coarse sand , ? trace silt, gravel, clay - loose 5SS to medium dense - moist to wet - 6 ? (SP - SM) 6SS 12, 13 Q fi di d il um san y s Brown ne to me t, trace gravel very stiff - moist - 7SS 15' ML ' d-brow R silt fi r t 16 e n y ne o coa se sand, trace graveY - medium dense - ? 8SS m is - SW-SP 16 ? Red-brown fine to coarse sand , ? trace silt, gravel - medium dense- 9SS moist - (SW-SP) 24 ? End of Boring at 20 feet Hollow Stem Auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttings WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED ?1 - W L Y See a e at 9 feet INC. GME CONSULTANTS BORING COMPLETED E)-13-86 . . W L Whi 1 e Dri 11 i n , 2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 DRILLER RDK . . w L Dr After Dri 11 i n MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN WDP I APPROVED WCK . JOBtt 1073 SHEET2 Of 2 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual. mxrcn r .-+ o ?-+ c r--i m m r N C m U. S. Stanaare Siev. ownimss in Inches U. S. Standud Siwe Numbots Hraromour 3 1{ 1 1 1 i 3 4 6 8 10 16 16 20 30 40 506070 100 140 200 270 0 mo too I'- ? ? z n _` rn ; • to nI.- r c 90 r-?cn-< n v cn z -i szo ?-+ rn m N 20 c j? ?-? 90 rn 30 ? 70 O ? C7 m ? t O0 40 3 v 60 3 0 r ? 50 ? ? 50 c i `a . I U c « 60 ? 40 ? a a 70 ? r*?. 30 I . ;?. so 20 1 t 90 10 ? 3 ? -- +1 1 1 1 1 1 2 E I 4 ±t 100 : 0- 300 50 10 5 1 0.5 u.! 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 ;rain Size in Millimeters z cM RA AN SILT or CLAY mCUD? Cwrs• Fin• Co.n• Medlu• iin• ? ? ? vmn 0> C:) v2 ; ? z Z m n rn N ? Z ,.? pc? --1 V7 pp D D rn m ? ? A . J ? C) V W KEY BORIfJG SAMPLE DEPTH LL PL PI NATe W.C- Cl1?SSIFICATION 3 4 - (o' - - - I lo . Ce % - row cl e ?'i r-if- i d --- 4,5$6 7.5- 12,1 - - - 14.8% row "L • £LOI 98-8I-9 NOM HW*A dlUS3NNIW `Nd9d3 triS4 dlOS3NNIW 'snodv3NNiw 3Ndl A2Ri383f118 310diO a31N30 lsv3 eeoa S31tf1S3 dOlllIH INI'S1NdlIHN03 M L NoOlB `9i '8 5T `tii SlOI SISAltlNt/ 3A3IS Cy O N O W O P erce t O nt Fine Ir O r by We 0 O ight V O ? U 1p O -- O 8 W? N N N C? Y O G o _ / ~ D Z ? o U + ? : a M + m / ? -` .? ? w ° d i o0 0 N Z p ? e t ? U M - 3 I J o 0 ? N G ' ? Q g O ti O ll ? N ?r'1 o I ? o p 1 ? g w 0 g ? .. S g ? o P $ eru t C o oars r b 'o y W igh 0 t 0 0 0 I I ? ? r? N .. -{1 1? C?1 ? ? ? r m m 2 r? N - ? ? W ? ? U ? U ? ? ? ? ? p N 1 ? ?• ? ? n «.. O a ? ? Q ? ? UNIFIED 801L CLA881FICATION 8Y93TEM (ASTM: D 2487) I Msjor divisions svTGroup bwols TYPieW nw+a Laborstory dasifieation critKis 1 ? CW Wellgsded Orswk, p?avelsand ? ?so ' 10301 ? than 4; C- bstwsen i and 3 ?? ° 01 o?fo ?? o a -r mixtures, little or no fnes Dio 0 p C w ?9 ? ?! O + w M ? C O 0 . Poorly qradwi prsvels. OrsveI- 4 L? $ = Not msetiny all yradation nquirtrrwnts fdr GW . sand mixtures. little or no fines • ? Z c d ? N y ? " " ? c r? t ?9 CM Silty 9ravels, qrsvelssndsih M 3? N y? A Atterberg fimitsMlow 4 h ? b E mixtutes an line or P.I. less t Abovs "A" lins witb P.1. - .- O o? u ? Q E 6etwssn 4 and 7 sre bor use i i R ?0. O N O?. . C1sYeY 9?avels, yrsvsl-send-clay Z ?? Atterberg limits abow ••A•• np ? drrline eases re4u of dual symbols 2 L ? Q GC ?MU? ? line with P.I. pneter than 7 c ? ... E W ? ? ? Well-ynded unds, pravNly P o? .. . 2 C?60 (D30 ? greater then 8: C? n 1 ancf 3 ? ?` ? ?• w+?, littk or no 6nes ?? .. . p 10 ??o?so o tt € .. .._ ., ? . . . E- ?,? V? ? Poorly qnded sondc, prsvsllY e'? .. •.. Not msstirq sll yrsdation rsquinmsn?? lor SW q a ? ands. little or no fina 9t o? . . 0 • C C ?? O d 0- E ' g " " SM Sihy ssnds. ssndsik mixtura " : ? c a$$ 't' ;; ` A Atterbery limits balow line or P.I. les thsn 4 I.imits pbttinp in hetched u 'o ? k ??• o ? e q mne with P.I. between 4 T M! 60/?f/IIM C89B5 ? . ?e M?.-?. Y o qeyW ssnds, pnd-day mix- p? C ?« E •c ? ? e o 4??« = J7 Atterbe?p limits above "A roquiring use of dual sym- bols. &I? SC pures ?$ - 0 line with P.I. greater than 7 Q OG $ Inorgenic silts and very fine sands, rodc flour, silty or dey- ? ML ey fine ssnds or dayey silts 60 m with dight plsstitity . ? M 4 Inorganic dsys of low to me- CL dium plasticity, provetly dsys, sc ? ?+ E ssndy Gays. silty clays, lean dws H:2 J Orgenic silts snd orpsoic silty ? " ?? Clays oi low plastiCity x ? Inorganie silts, miceceous w u MH diatomxeous fine sandy or ?- L tilty soils, elastic silts d ? 2 ?e « " d Inwpanic cleys of high plas- ?..?° ... CH ticity, fat clays 1 « r E , N y ` ? Orpanic eleys ot medium to ., OH hiyh pfastieity, organic silu Pt Pset and other hiyhly orpsnic ?: I I soils Z p For dassification of fineyr81ned soils and fine frsction of oosrse- rainad soits . p Atterbsrg Limits plottinp in hatched srea sn borderline daal- fications roquirinp use of dual mbols f . y Equation of Adine: PI=0.731 LL - 20) I . OH s ' MH ??P ) CL ) d0L 4 .. La n . ,.. ,.? ? p 10 Z(7 JU YV ov w ... -- -- Liquid Limit Plnticity Chart I C AI. NO'tib ?!1 ?IARI2NT 2! COMPACT[D FILL 3GIL Lg"E""L TAe pi?ew?n! ef ea.peeteA [111 fOr ?upport ot founAatlan*. [loor sIabs, pavawnls. or earth ?erutture? SnoulA De c?rrleE out by ?n eap•rleneed r?c?v?'o?enttn ?nA ?ateil.l. t?t?entYW o; e?e?v?tor ?u?l be DteqreA to ?A?pt I+l? proceEurri, eq? p? project. to re&ther eondlelon?, •nd the ttructunl repulreT?ot. ol the archiLect anA ea9i.eor. MetnoA? •nd ??te.ll• n6ed fn 9uTSer p.y mt be applle.ble In deterr ffll u?W in Ary eRC pit?tlont pmpo?eC av?tlons w?y wt pe sutt?Dle I. +et txcav?tfons or Aurinq perlode 01 preel •?ry •Aur! qY tAeYCOUr?etofni pre?ertnor'In d(I(erent ?re??tofnt?e?ite?jin .???.?5; .no 10 ,be 0 Adr?ued in tM project dowln9s a^d sFe<«<utlo- . . C7tCAVATION/bIICRFILL lCIAM TNE YI1Tt11 TAlLC It 1• ea""en to Mve to no.v. te .nA teplace nnsultaDle wll. belw qYe wter qble Por •!tt correctlon. As •generat rule ot prudent comtruetlon tcehni re reco?end tMt extavatlon/Oac4ti11 Ee?w tAe r?te. toDle not be perwitteA, unl1n the eRe.vatlon l. dewtereE. Nu?erou? propie?u nn dwefop rAen tAl& pro nAure fs dttupted rlenout Aerat.rlnq. - ln*Dllity o( M pulpwent openton anA wll teehnid?n• to oD•erve tMtt .II unsuluDle soll-/nrterl?l? ??ve M?n . , tweveA !rom tM Wn* of tM eatawtlon. . ln?Dlllry te oDstrva an0 ?easure tna! Orepf btersl erfr- . ?lslnq 1 9 prevlAeA. . . . • In?DiUtr to pnvent or eorr?et devqhlM et .tegvvtlon .Ie?wus. .nicn e.n r.wlt !n unwltaDle fell@ enPpW rlthln tM select EeeAfl1l. - Inablllty ot tAe eontraetor to sApnately and unl(orwlr emp.ct tM Mclt[111. ? hnlbllity o1 dl.tutEanee e( the suluble selU at tM lase of tne exuweloe. ? eonttreuetloni ynecte?s• txc?tlontnoin e1?ytMe altee beraerstered vith?iump pltri?nC Prudent thls t?chnlque vou10 net pe ?pp?lc?Dle fo[ eac?..tion tacenAtny Into per?e?Dle 1nnul.r ?031. ??peol?lly [or AeptA? siqnlllantly belev tna r?ter t.Cle. Der.terfnq qr?nulu :oll? ?houlA norrlly W Aone d th rell polnl? or velle. Mhen Awatering !s neeAed, re stronqly r*cro?end that . tAe prxeAUnr Ee dl?cuued ?L prrbid or pre-eomtruetlon ?eetlnqs. The Oer.tering tecnnlque ehosen py the contnctor sAooid W revieved by the orthfteet •nA enqlneer belon eonstruceten sbru1 1t shauld not Ee le[t untll exeavation !f unAer rey. "e seleetion oL preper MeA(111 utezlaL Is.lmporunt rAen rorRinq ln Ae.atered euavstlom. Cven rlth Aewaterlnq, the ba.e 1s usually vet ?nd tAe contractor must Ee coreful not to A1eturU tne D??e. re reeow.eod tMt the fir?t )ltte o/ backffll Ee ? e?ean wediuw to ewne qnln ` •?nd rft? 1 e.0 tA.n S% {MUangtAe 1700.sisrs. Tne use o/ ?ilty s,nd. e1?Y?y •?nE. or eoAnlveh.sl-cohe?fve salli U not rero?ended tor iuch sltuatione. The eac.v?tor qhoulA M raqulred te suEelt u?nFl?, o[ tht ptopoatd ?ster/sl bl he pt?ns to usa u backflll De!_ ore tNe Illl 1s MuIeA to th e ut?. .o tA?t IL e?n Ee te.ted lor ?u1t?Di1lty. MIMTG CMTNM011R COMSTRUCTfON . •lnter qrthwrt preBents 1ts wm ran9e of problao rhlch wet W everewt the dtwtlon "y W emplleste0 by the neMfor Aev&tKing afseuuad aEOVe. Ourln7 freeeing eondltions, tM lili usM mwt not be froten when AelfrerM to Me •lte. 7t •Iso ?uet not De aIlwed to [reeae Aurlnq or aftei cwipactton. llnce the a0illty to wrR th •oll Mlle Aeeptng It trar [reealnq Aepends Sn part on tha &oll type. the ?peeifieattone ?Muld reqalre tnr eontnetor to wM?lt I umple o( Au propoied fill Delore tonstrueeion ?taru. Tor 1abontorY taacleq. I[ tAe toll enqlnee? •nd ?tructurH:englmer deterwine tNt !t L not wluDte. 1t shoulA pe re7ectsd. In 9ener?l. ?llty snd. rl?yeY ?.nd. ?nd eoAexlre/.eni- eoM?lve •o!U shou1A oot De u.eA u[311 under [rnsing eoMitione. AIi [rosen soll of •ny t rw .neule w r.jeecea for u.. .+ comv.oe.a uu. ft !s fyotant tAmt empeeLrA flll De proteeaA /rm tneiing atter ft 1• plaeed• The t?uv?tor ??ou1A be [equlred te subnlt a p1a n [or protectlnq the soll. The plan \hOVIA ?.CIYO* detalls en tbe type and a,aunt ot mteri?l IKr??, E1?nRets. extn loo?e [111, topsoll' ete.l ptopoveA !or uw u lrost protecelon. Lne neeA to protecc t?e ?oll [row free[Snq 1• onqolnq throughout eonstructlon and sppl1ee both belo1 e ?nd Hter concrete U pliceA, until E?ek[1lling . Io1 f1na1 [rost protecuon is cowpleted. fouM tion. pleced on Iroten *011 cln •?pe,lence h e??lnq •nd ?f9^itlca^t ?etC?enent. tot?tton, or othei woveMnt ?. the ?oll ther?. 6uc11 . kv?went an M. eeeur ![ tAe .oil l? sIIweE Lo Reese after tAe eonerete fs placed anC then . alloreE to tAor. 7he hlql+et !Ae pereent.ge of ftnea IN mY •nd sSlt, P-200 mtetld 1!n the flll. ene wre c.iUed U tne need tor proteetlon trm IreesSnq. .. . . . . . . BMl COM1Yl7AMTS. IMC . .. 1qISTV1IE ?MRROL O? riLL fh* eentreetor Should Ee rpulreA te aA)u?t !Ae ?olstun eenttnt of M* wll to rtthla & mrrov r?nqe nr?r tAe o?tl?uw wol?ture eontent lu OeftneA 4y tAe applleable ?rxtor er MSNTO Testl. 2n ??ne??l. (111 .nouie ee r?.cee rleAln about 7, of.oDel?uw. Tl?e nNA IorwoUture eentrol 1• wre cNtic?l •• t?e Percent?qe of flne• lnere?o. Matunlly-ocwrfln, elayey •.nd or cone.lvehewl-eohlsive ?oll •re otten wu h oeller tMn the optlpuw. PI?elnq "A Kt?nDtlnp to coTpect •ucA soll• to the gpecllied denstty w.y pe Alffleult, o[ not po?dble. Lven ll uit.ble p?vewenta ?uD9??4eseC0ueedtoe^D?'V1naf•nEer`appll dtlo dlm YA1s ?! ?&p.cf*lly ?tru?orrhen b vet cone?fve/se'i-cone.lv. noll I. u. ed Ss nac4f111 !n utlllty erenches uMer atreeu. ha??slvely ret •ofl in t?ftk Hll •eclton? ??y c?a?e pmt-construeHon 8 ettle?ent MyoM tMt otlteA tor f111 pLceO ?t or neec t!2U tAe opumuw roisture content. An ueeptfen to tAU roulA EtIw peneablifty g011 plaeeA na peM llner or tor, Au. tuch Soll •hould ulu.lly be p1.eeA .t 1\ to 41 *hove the optl.u. ?ol.ture eontent, to provlde for • Iwer Lneltu perwe?b/llty. AIro. •hrlnRin9/ovelltn9 ?oil• leapmnstve elayl shoulA Ee p1areE *t •bout N to 41 ?bov. optlwun wl.ture Co reduee tAe po.d bility o( ?o/l eap?n?ion. CI?Yey ?Ut. •llt, or rery mIlty tine und rnoulE not Oe pl.ced.eueasiwly Ary. fuch ?otl. un undergo post-tonatruetlon eonwlidetion upon Eelnq retuE, wen !/ the ?qclfi?A den?lty h?d Eern •cnieveE. TAis 1s uuled by tM coll?pro of •[Ixcul.nt wfl pertlNe ?rnnye?ent. •nd eon Tnult ln settle?ent of Do11Aln9+ or .1?D? eon?trueteA ever tht soil. tropet eontrol ot flil wll ?lvture ls eM responslElllt7? et tM esnwter. TM eiesnter n the Aat? l? th• ¦ofl q lh. 'oll?. MleA *tthe1.0 ,houlA tval-te.the n.ed [or uettln9 or Arylnw? report. or hL wm ?Ite totln9• 1f tA? r?etor U Erle9lnq !n olM1lt. llll. !t L.I.o hl• respona1b111tY to ev?lus tethe ?olsture eontent ot tM .oll. &n0 tM n??d ler wttln9 or Aryln?. W recownend tA?t l?l? ueter w.aereuea /n tM pro)ece ?peclflcaUOn.. coNRT11tICTlOM OM Cq1iAC7CD $OIL Arc.r en. .eiecc uu eu wen pi.e.a. co."ecea. •na a.ew, u ".c w rine.iew -e n proteeted in orAer co properly ?upwrt ?tructure?. the ?uft?bllity o! eo?pseNA f1U O0l1 e, p. I re. tly 0/w1n1?De0 U!t I. Illo+ed to [rceet, beeome ??tur?teA rh11. uneonfln?A bueB ?? fn [wtlnq exea•a61ons or ac the surlaee ot sIab/plocewnt subqradel, or Alstur0eA.0y emstructlon .quipwent. Tne r*spenalblllty fer proteettng tne ?eil, or for earreetinq .nr eJrturwnee. sheulA be ele?rly Ae[lned ln the spoctlleatlons. Boi1. rAich Eeewie wt ?nE wft ?Hv eaMetlon toW.9 do not nece?uNly reflect ln?ecunte [leld Aenllty tesu. ly r1t? non-e.p?n. ire eoAe?lve/?esl-rones/ve sofls. utuutfon rMn unconflne0 un .L?-vp?eerdlydreAuce the thelt Itr .. Ih vti lte t?e Oentlty rew?n- eeeyu?ie. rne rceuced ?he?r strenqtA tse Nuse toottnq.. T1oor .faD?, pr p?vewrnu to 0etU e or lall under loaA. rr ?tronqly reeowmnd chat ?Il p+reoent..uDgnEea be tot tolled IMM/DOT tpecllidt(on 21111 lreElately Oe[ote pewing to Oetnglne 1t tAe suDgraAe hn not Wen protecteA anA soft spots A- Eeveloped. Ltooe aus eveciuoe 11ND UTILITY TIIEMCML6 Thls f?ttt et eonstruetlon pre* ents spefal Prebts?. e?ped?tly f[ the aLb wEqnAe L.ilwed to [reeze. Imen the ?oll tMv., it un0erqx? ? perloA a! CawponHlr larec ?hnr •tren9eh. ?Ioor •IaDs•hould not be eut over wil In ?uch a wmkened er ltosen eoMltien Ireterence . The pertlnent PtA a nA AC( publloatlons l. 7o do w can result J. enekeA anA hillnq •la be tl.e pertod to nest and tAar • Dulldlnq w?y pl?ce CAe constructlon scheAule . nd/oa cost. !n ?eopardy. re •tronglY recwn?nd tA?t tAl. ?stter be rorle?reA !n pra-Eld anE pr.-eon. eruetlon ?eetinq?. . Mcklilllnq et utlllty tnncAet !n tM floo[ s1a4 su0qude ean W Alt(leult. 1t tAe sel1 ls vet. crowWCtion to the speclfied Aenslty ?uy Df dl!!lCUlt, of not poBsible. The na[roriy Cut trenclee w.y preclude the use of proper eowp?c6fon eQUtpwe^t• Mlth the u?e e[ *?all equlp?ent !n eon[1neE area ?, the contr.efor wust OLce tAa wil !n tAln !ltt. 11 to 6 IncAe.l? vfCh the &oll •t tht proper wotKUre content. thU rotY Ss tyD, nlly urrfeA out by oontraeton other than the mns q-d(nq or earthrorR tontractor. Me ?troryly recooend that tAe responsiDUlty to carry out the eowpactSon be eleorly deu11e0 in the rppltuEl. .ectlon ot the •pecftlcsttons. •na tavl.vee vien ene .pproptf.te eoner,ecor .ne .ubeoner•emr.. .Yl teMflllTAriS. IAC ?otu oF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 June 12, 1986 PARCEL FILE 4158 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE ?, ) l(' ?3 -/ MR AND MRS STEVE REED 4150 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE EAGAN, MN 55123 Re: Storm Water Drainage Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reed: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor iHOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members 1HOMAS HEDGES City Adminisirator EUGENE VqN OVERBEKE City Cierk Hopefully our meeting that was held Thursday, June 5 was beneficial and the storm water problem will be resolved in the near future so all three (3) property owners can complete their landscaping. It is unfortunate that the builder of Lot 16 did not use the elevation as recommended by Sienna Corporation at the tzme the home was constructed. The elevations for Lots 14 and 15 were determined by the building that occurred on Lot 16. With three (3) builders involved with Lots 14, 15 and 16 it can be a problem, given the circumstances, to resolve the drainage issue that has been created. Hopefully the wet well that was proposed as an alternative by the engineering firm of Jim Hill and Associates, representing Sienna Corporation, will provide proper resolution to the water ponding that has occurred since the three lots were developed. As I discussed at our meeting last Thursday, the City does not typically involve itself with matters that are considered private property and normally can only be resolved between a property owner and his or her builder. However, because this drainage issue directly affects three (3) properties and could indirectly impact two (2) adjacent properties, Lots 12 and 13, it seemed appropriate that the City attempt to facilitate some solution to the drainage problem. Please feel free to contact this office or our engineering division if you have any questions regarding the proposed construction of a wet well by the builders and three (3) property owners. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc : Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation "°'fmx_ , ",e P,? -.i' Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works L?'tr1?: ?'? Jack Moffat , Dale Gustaf son THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNIN WAIVER OF HEARING N0. 00153 Special Assessment Authorization I/We hereby request and authorize the Gity of Eagan, MN (Dakota Co.) to assess the following described property owned by me/us: Lot 16, Block*LHilltop Estates _?__ . . , . - for the benefit received from the following improvements: - ITEM - QUANTITY RATE • . AINOUNT ? PROJECT Storm sewer outlet Lump sum $1,000.00 $1,000.00 ,481 _to be spread over 15 years at an annual inte?est ra e0 of O lo.o o against any remaining.:unpaid balances. _ The undersigned, for themselves, their heirs, executors,,administrators successors arid assigns, hereby consent to the levy of these assessments, and further, hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary, and waive objections to any technical defects in any proceedings related to these assessments, and further waive the right to object to or ap eal from these assessments•made, pursuant to this agreement. . - Dated: J/? Z 4? ,(/12,t.(.? ---_._.._ • _ ?=,`--_ ?..___ Daniel'T. Osborn : • Cheryl 0 orn STATE OF -P? COUNTY OF? SS , on this o?P'`?da o f . ' Y ?`-f?yt.?/•P?, , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personall appcared EL ;. AA?15 ??;?ipY? C3Sgofa?1 to me personally known to be the person ? described in and wlio executed the foregoing instrument and a -,? ecuted the same as /%.a4z,, free ct and deed. •''""?LAUREL A. SCH • ??i? NOTARY PUBLIC hAINNESOTA ? . ? DAkOT9 GOUNTY ?Th1S DOCUmerlt D MY Commission Expires Feb: 8,1990 ?t 1ib11C Hauge, 8mith, Eide F, Keller, P.A. APPROVED• ' 3908 Sibley Memorial liighway ' Eagan, Minnesota 55122 ?(? .. . ' (612) 454-4224 . tagan Public WorTcs irectoda, --' Revised: 8-30-82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - For Office Use P City of Eaali . 3830 Pilot Knob Road MAY Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: 13 - Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 o5 ' l S C`a&oc Staff: 2009 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: ; f3 09 Site Address: yl S5 'Fe" C-/'a £ Tenant: Suite RESIDENT I OWNER Name: J I K~ k)i'c2(Z Phone: Address / City / Zip: 'y1~V &C4W. o, ciQGC c Applicant is: Owner Contractor TYPE OF WORK Description of work: zc loo rte Construction Cost: ors 0 Multi-Family Building: (Yes / No CONTRACTOR Name:" c, - .,cs w 2 License 3 7 g Address: 9030 ) / 5 City: ~L oo M,+ ~ c T b ~ S State: Zip: 521z, Phone: -2,0o--1G-75' Contact Person: ---7-0,1 11t COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING _ Minnesota Rules 7670 Category 1 Minnesota Rules 7672 Energy Code • Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet • New Energy Code Worksheet Category Submitted Submitted submission type) • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x JAi5 ('f%- x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES -Foundation Fireplace Porch (3-Season) Storm Damage Single Family _ Garage _ Porch (4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration (Single Family) _ Multi Deck Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Exterior Alteration (Multi) 01 of Plex Lower Level Pool _ Miscellaneous Accessory Building WORK TYPES New Interior Improvement Siding Demolish Building* Addition Move Building Reroof Demolish Interior _ Alteration _ Fire Repair Windows Demolish Foundation Replace Repair Egress Window Water Damage *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION Valuation D6Q Occupancy ..~C MCES System Plan Review Code Edition 2ea7 SAC Units (25%_ 100%_) Zoning City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump # of Units Square Feet PRV # of Buildings Length Z Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction Width _ 7 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Sheetrock Footings (Deck) Final / C.O. Required 2 Footings (Addition) Final / No C.O. Required Foundation HVAC Drain Tile Other: Roof: -Ice & Water -Final Pool: -Footings -Air/Gas Tests _Final Framing Siding: -Stucco Lath -Stone Lath -Brick Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test -Final Windows Insulation Retaining Wall Meter Size: INA, MIA*. Reviewed By: , Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review = ~9 30 MCES SAC Z Z X TX I{ q~5_ City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies TOTAL City Council Minutes May 5, 2009 Page 2 D.. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2009 Special City Council meeting as revised. E. It was recommended to approve the Workers Compensation Services Agreement with Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC. F. Moved to Recognitions and Presentations G. Moved to Recognitions and Presentations H. It was recommended to approve a contract for construction manager services related to the proposed Fire Safety Campus. 1. It was recommended to approve a one-year extension of the Preliminary Subdivision approval for Diffley Plaza 2nd Addition, for property located at 4249 Johnny Cake Ridge Road legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Diffley Plaza, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. J. Removed. K. It was recommended to approve a Final Plat (Christ Lutheran) to create one lot on approximately 9 acres located at 1930 Diffley Road. L. It was recommended to direct staff to initiate an Ordinance Amendment to Chapters 5, 10 and 11 specifically as it relates to Temporary Outdoor Events. M. It was recommended to proclaim May 17 through May 23, 2009, as Public Works Week and authorize 09-7 the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N. It was recommended to approve an extension of the Easement and Assessment Agreement with the owner of PIN 10-72840-011-01 (Cedarvale Business Center) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 0. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications by the City Engineer for Contract 09-08 (2009 City-wide Trail and Sidewalk Improvements). P. It was recommended to approve a license to sell tobacco products for Rheata Donatell, Lone Oak Store, LLC at 1286 Lone Oak Road. PUBLIC HEARINGS VARIANCE - JAMIE MELAHN - 4158 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for a variance of 7 feet to the required 30-foot minimum front yard setback for a front porch addition on property located at 4158 Blueberry Circle. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Mayor Maguire opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Council held a brief discussion. Councilmember Hansen moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Variance of 7 feet to the required 30-foot minimum front yard setback for a front porch addition on property legally described as Lot 16, Block 1, Hilltop Estates, located at 4158 Blueberry Circle subject to the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0 1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the Council. Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance. 2. The porch addition shall not exceed the size shown on the proposed site plan. The roof shall match the pitch and style of the existing roof on the house. 3. The addition shall comply with all other applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions. 4. A building permit must be obtained prior to construction. ----76.b7 - T37E-' l ? Al L-D ..aAT fl slip/ t rs t t'~ '4 t;^ LIONS DIVISION v), l .o~ as MM M 6 15 0 10 30 SCALE 1' = My 01% 0, Fd.1 " ro 0 °A°SP Pipe pej ~O ° 26 3J~'a • x' eJiO`6636' v~y \ ` `K~ ~"~NNamnnumrrir9~'i''o 47 ` RANDY D. S t LUETH 1-4% \ N B LANDSCAPE \ ARCHITECT a ~f Ilk \ NO. a Fd.1 /2" I.P. \ '%,y~~s"~oii 1477,6P\\\N\ CO Blueberry I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE Circle STATE OF MINNESOTA. Pant Name: NDY LUE Sigratu ' Date: Licerue a 14776 Sheet 1 of 2 MefJahn -Kfnard/5fte Phan. dwg Aug. 26, 2008 Public An Site Plannning Plan i SITE PLAN for Variance to Setback Mesta' ng Meilahn - Kinard Residence Recreation Design RANDY LUETH - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4158 Blueberry Circle, Eagan, MN 1826 Pheasant Run Drive, Marshfield, WI 54449 Phone: 715.207.0601 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA113442 Date Issued:09/04/2013 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-160 Use: Description: Sub Type:Reroof Work Type:Replace Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:If there is no ice protection inspection prior to final, the contractor must meet the inspector w/ a ladder and flat bar. Pictures are not acceptable in lieu of inspections. Carbon monoxide detectors are required by law in ALL single family homes . Alex Shikhlinski Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Jamie S Meilahn 4158 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Delta Construction Inc 11299 Harness Draw Woodbury MN 55129 (651) 691-5021 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature ,r . y Use BLUE or BLACK Ink �----------------- � For Office Use � �� �, '4� Cl�� j Permit#: � �� �� I ��� �� ����� � ��� � Permit Fee: � �' I 3830 Pilot Knob Road �ry�������� � I Eagan MN 55122 U j Date Received: `�J� j Phone:(651)675-5675 I 1 I Fax:(651)675-5694 I Staff: 1 I � I �----------------- 2014 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ° ����� �� � Date: ' "�� Site Address: �( � ��-��i7� �� � �+��-� Unit#: �� Name: �C� ��• t�u C� e, a'�� �e,� u�� Phone: �5� " ������.J Resident/ R Owner Address/City/Zip: ��5� V���r� �- ���--��- Applicant is: Owner V Contractor Type of Work. ' Description of work: �C'G��., �G�'���.CT��� ':` Construction Cost:� -1i�1�'�`�� Multi-Family Building: (Yes /Nd 1�) Company: T �Ft��L "�7 � ��---L-- Contact: ���� �\���� Contractor Address: ��d�� �� �`�� � : City: I�G�t-'"�Y� �� -�"�W State: �� Zip:,��� Phone: �,J�'���J�"�`'��maiL• 1� e$. c:(\c� 1����-.. �(gr'1 License#: Lead Certificate#: If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for a ditional information) �� c�.,r�"� i tiC` `t G(1 ��v. � ; � ��-i`T `=, `� ��� �..� COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months,has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes _No If yes,date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: - Sewer&Water Contractor: Phone: NQTE:Plans and supporting documents that you submit are corisidered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classifietl as non-p�rblic if you provide speci�c reasons that would permit the Cify toi conclude that the 'are tratle secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.aoaherstateonecail.orq I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180 days of permit issuance. X N;�;� �I�� � �.. X � ApplicanYs Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 � �/5� �jlc,�.���v `��C�h,c.,� �. � ,�. � ������� DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES Foundation _ Fireplace _ Porch(3-Season) _ Exterior Alteration(Single Family) � Single Family _ Garage _ Porch(4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration(Multi) _ Multi � Deck _ Porch(Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Miscelianeous _ 01 of_Plex _ Lower Level _ Pool _ Accessory Building WORK TYPES � New _ Interior Improvement _ Siding _ Demolish Building* _ Addition _ Move Building _ Reroof _ Demolish Interior _ Alteration _ Fire Repair _ Windows _ Demolish Foundation _ Replace _ Repair _ Egress Window _ Water Damage _ Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building—give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION �'" Valuation �� s�� Occupancy 1(�-��.- MCES System Plan Review Code Edition Zc���w�5t3L SAC Units (25%_100%�) Zoning ��--,Z City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump #of Units Square Feet PRV #of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction .�� Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Meter Size: � Footings(Deck) Final/C.O. Required Footings(Addition) � Final/No C.O. Required Foundation HVAC Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test Roof: _Ice&Water _Final Pool:_Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final � Framing Drain Tile Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test _Final Siding:_Stucco Lath _Stone Lath _Brick Insulation Windows Sheathing Retaining Wall:_Footings_Backfill_Final Sheetrock Radon Control Fire Walls Erosion Control Braced Walls Other: Reviewed By: �� , Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee ��� �O� �-- 3 Q� Surcharge � Plan Review G�� � � � = ( � � MCES SAC t_.) City SAC �/" (� ` �� /� Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit 8� Surcharge S -�' ��P Treatment Plant C� � Copies �Q TOTAL Page 2 of 3 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA141938 Date Issued:04/06/2017 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-160 Use: Description: Sub Type:Windows/Doors Work Type:Replace Description:One Window/Door Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Valuation: 500.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $500 $40.00 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $500 $0.50 9001.2195 $40.50 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Jamie S Meilahn 4158 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Renewal Andersen 1920 County Road C West Roseville MN 55113 (651) 264-4777 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA148958 Date Issued:04/30/2018 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-160 Use: Description: Sub Type:Windows/Doors Work Type:Replace Description:Two or More Windows/Doors Census Code:434 - Residential Additions, Alterations Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Valuation: 4,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Jamie S Meilahn 4158 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Renewal Andersen 1920 County Road C West Roseville MN 55113 (651) 264-4777 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing Permit Number:EA154370 Date Issued:03/18/2019 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-160 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Replace Description:Water Heater Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection. Allow an 18" minimum radius clearance to the water meter from all appliances (i.e. furnace, water heater, water softener). Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$59.00 0801.4087 Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Jamie S Meilahn 4158 Blueberry Cir Eagan MN 55123 Tony's Appliance 2090 County Road 42 West Burnsville MN 55337 (952) 435-2442 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Mechanical Permit Number:EA172998 Date Issued:10/25/2021 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates PID:10-33000-07-160 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Replace Description:Air Conditioner Comments:Questions regarding electrical permit requirements should be directed to State Electrical Inspector, Pete DeGrood at (507) 210-0754. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Fee Summary:ME - Permit Fee (Replacements)$59.00 0801.4088 Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Jamie S Meilahn 4158 Blueberry Cir Saint Paul MN 55123--140 (612) 322-5378 North State Mechanical 1444 14th Street W Hastings MN 55033 (612) 207-0345 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature