4158 Blueberry CirThis re4uest void tb?( (
18 moniti3 from
._3524 8 -f -c I _'U
= ques
ate Fire No.
I
Requhed?Inspeciion
?Ready Now WiII Noirfy Inspec-
g
O es ?No V
tor When Ready
icensed Electrical Contractor I hereby request inspection of above
Owner :electcicaP work instslled at:
Sireet Address, Box or Route'No.
1115P Al &/ City
eetion o'.' Township Name or No Range No. - Cbu ty '
OccupanY (PRINT) , Phone No.
P wer Suppiie ?
vu,? /e?.fr.? Address
Electjipal Co??ctor IC m any Name4
,r ?/? ? tractor's Lense No.
Mailing Address tContractor or Owner Making+instailation)
<:?
=nature (Contractor/Owner Making Ins Ilation
{(` c Phon ?umbe
1 'i
g NESOTA STATE gOAR?F ELECTRICITY THIS INSPECTiON REQUEST IMILC:NOT
gs-Midway Bldg. - Rom N-191 BE ACCEPTED BY THE SFATE BOARD
1-821 Un'ivePSity Ave., St. Pau4, MN 55104 UNLE$S PROPER' INSPECTION PEE IS
Phone (612) 297-2111 ENCLOSED.
REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL 1NSPECTION ee-00001_03 ,
?3t-S 2 4 8 , See instructions for completing this form on back of yellow capy. ")V" Be/ow Work Covered bv This RPrnlPct
4
if
#- Fee ServiceEntranceSize tt FQS Feeders /S ubfeeders #Fe e Circuits
Q to 100 Am s 0 to 30 qm S to 30 Rm s
1 Q1 to 200 qrrips 3tto 100AmPs b 31 to 100 q S
Above 20Q_Ams Abo0Am Above 100_lampg
Transformers Remote,Gontrol Girc. Par '
R ??9ns Speciallnspection e
?,
emarks
. : _ S 1
ora-Vy ..? 1
oug -in '
Date
.,Ar the ElectricaF
o
l? rftrpector. hereby
Final ? p?? certify that the above
spection has been'-
ihis request void
iQ
F* , d` ade.
e
Add
Rft. .
TyPe of Buiiding .. ..
qppliances Wired .: .? C....• ?C .
EqUipment'Wired
Home Range Tempprary Service
Duplex Water Weater Lighting Fixtures
_ ,;?t? Buildin?;K Dryer E}ectric Heatin
Commercial Bidg. Furnace Silo Unloader
industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Ta?rk
Farm Other Specifv Other(Suecify)
t er Speeify Other
Other
CO!/ ]pUt B lns nPCtinn Foo Rol....,
CITY OF EAGAN
3830 Pilot Knab Ra?ii, P.Ca Box 21•199, Eagan, MN 55121
'PHONE:454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT tteceipt #
Te b, w"d im UECK Est. Vo?ue $1,000 pate JUNE o
N- 10 4 01
13 lq 85
SiteAddresa 4158 BLUEBERRY CIR Erect (3 Occupancy
Lot 16 elock 7 Sec/Sub. HILLTOP EST Remodel ? 2oning
Parcel No Repair ? Type of Const.
. Addition ? No. Stories
DAN OSBORN Move ? Length
W Neme'
SAME Demolish ? Depth
; Address Int. Impc ? Sq. Ft.
b City Phone 452-5614
Install ?
Apoeovals Fees
Zo Name SAME
pu A??$
uI Assessment Permit
I- City Phone Water & Sew. Surcharge e50
& Police Plan Review
gZ Name Ffre SAC
H Address Eny. Water Conn.
tW City Phone Plonner Water Meter
Council Road Unit
( hereby ocknowledge that 1 have rebd this opplication ond state that gldg. Off, 6 7$ rJ Tr. PL
the iniormotion is torrect ond_ ogree t compil wit pplicable
Stote of Minnesota Stat City Eq O ?ce . APC Parks
' Var. Date
Sipnotum of Pertnittee '?•G'?
?~ ? Copies
? $18 . 00
t
K euildin Pertnit is issued to: DAN OSBORN
9 ?
? e
X
preas condiNon thot
all work sholt be done in occo?do with all opptiwbJa State of #0 to Statutes ond City o3 Eeyon Ordinonces.
:
Buildirq Officiol ? v_? ?i
i'-?a.m'`-?
WATER SERVICE PERMIT
CITY OF EAGAN 4
3795 IlMot ' Knob Road PERMIT NO.: 9/zj?
Eogrin MN 85122 DATE: j ,
??fning: No. of Units:
Owner: DeVeZOpE:Z& CvT1StI'uCt]Ari
ndaress:
?+15f' Biu ?-?Y'?? 7
?°i? ??- *,,.? ?st at es
Site Address:
Plumber: ?SE'_ e rce i7CenC;ti'25z
tion Charge: 4 2 0•00 od
Meter No.:
Connec
Size: Account Deposit: D-e
Reader No.: Permit Fee:
1 ugree to eomPlY with the City of Eogon Surchqrge: Gt? (?0 T5d ????Z
Ordinonees. ` Misc. Chorges:
TotaL•
BY Dote Paid:
Date of I nsp.: I nsp.:
cirr oF EaGAN 3EWER -SERVICE PERMIT
3791, Pilot Kno6 Road PERMIT NO.: r'/
E?9a4. MN 55122
' DATE: _
Zoning: - rT V No. of Unitsr - l
Owner; PP srAnjiPra f'.czn strtirrfr,r
Address:
Site Address: 4 15 8 t:.tu ah nrrs {'ir L16 i7 F?i an Ed?a?Q+a
Plumber: ?T?i_erk? 'I3?t1CItii?<•
9J33lz' 31F10 100,00 pd
1 og?ee to eompip w1lh the City of Eagcn Connection Charge: . 4.15 TACL-od--_ .
Ordinanees. , Account Deposit:
Permit Fee: _ 1 ') , r70
Surcharge: 5
BY Mi
c
Ch
es
s
,
arg
:
Dote of Jnsp.: Totol:
insp.r pote Poid•
_
CITY OF.EAGAN ?.., ?
' 10401
.
f 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121
PHONEc 454-8100 \ .?`. ? .,} '
BUILDING MMIT Receipr #
Te bR piod fer ,'3ECK Est. Velue $a o Q'00 Dote
¦? JL)NE 13 , 19----Ar'J
Site Address ???? liLUE$ERRY CIR Erect 0( Qccupancy
I 6
Lot Block ? HI?,L?eOi?' ES'7C Remodel ?
?ec/Sub Zomng
Parce! No . Repair ? Type of Const
. Addition ? No. Stories
DAN OSB4Ri l? Move ? Length
W
; Nanie
Address Demolish ?
S?`E
Int
Impr
? Depth
S
Ft
b
City .
.
Phone 452` 561 4 Install ? q.
.
'
: ?
..?.. %
??
0 Name 0 ,
8'j Addresa Assessment
1- City Phone Woter & Sew.
F Police
?Z Name Fim
?? Address ' Eng•
? W City Phone Plonner
Counci(
I hereby otknowledge thot 1 hove read this opplicotion ond stote that Bldg. Off. 61??8?
the informotion is correct and Qgree to comp4y with aIV 'bpplisoble
Stote of Minnesoto $tatutes pGty of' Eogc?n Or¢inonces,
' ? APC
, ,
5ipnoturc of Pertnittee Var. Date
pAN OSBORN
N Building Permit is issued tot pn
all work shall be done in accordonce`with oU applicablq :Stote of Mtnneso#e Stotutes ond City o9
,?...
Buildinq Official APprovob Ft?c
..
: ..
Permit v + • « «..,
Surcharge • 50
Plan Review
SAC
Water Conrt
Water Meter ;
Road Unit
Tr. PL
Parks
Copies
Total ?
3w expreas condk%* tlxn
Eopon Ordirwncir. 3
? -
Mo. Pwmit Hokiw tA?r ' Te#st?hanr *
M,YA.C.
?
softww
l+apoetion - Date lnap. Othsr •
? i U
Founastbn
Fram#ne
? ?'0•
"D"b Ntw
?I?u?tt1.
?? .
iNeeel ihW
Ftn#?I Ptbg.
pinal -
Gw'tlOm
W?er DaaaribR 1.acatiFm: _
Weii
lS?wMrK ,
P9r:.D??.
CITti CF EAGAM
;r 374S Pqet ICnob Rooa Eogan, MN 55122
•
.
?
7,514
P6?ltil: 454-8100 .
BUILDING PERMIT ReceiPt
To be wed for `F Est. Volue $114.000 Date SeF}temkaez' 13 19 Ei7.
Site Address `? t `=l uererry C` _cle
;a
Erect
Octupancy 1i_
Lot $ lock ' Sec/Sub.F$iJ=ztoP EstateQ Alter ? Zoning . .
P
eF #' 1 ;3C'0
0 160 07 Repoir ? Fire Zone
are 1
E C
s
nlcrge Q Type of
on
t.
a Name _ L)'•'-Vi? Q[>E?YS COY18tY'UC'ti10;1
Move Q
,# Stories
?
Address
11'??- ??•' CZiff Road
Demolish p i
Length
? 15
C;t„ 1,3-jr svil1e p6,,„„ 39')-E194 Grode ? Depth Sq. Ft.
A Name Cravner
8" Address
?'• r:d.., eL,.__
Nama _
AddfCss _
1 hereby ocknowledge that I have reod this application ond state that
tMe informefiion is carrect and ogree to tomply with ali Gppiicoble
Stote of Minnesato $totutes ond City of Eogon Ordinances.
lissessment
Water & Sew.
Pol ice
Fire
Eng.
Plonner
Council
Permit ?AIWQ• ?','
??
Surcharge
Plon theck `?
SAC 2ry-
'`h'w,.'.JI ..
Water Conn. ?
Woter AM1eter
Rood Unit 2 4
Bldg. Off.
APC Totoi ????G Siyncture of Permiitee
A Building Pe(mit is issued ta: Devtilc>?:?ez's CC»13'?ruCtican on the expresd corWMan thni
all work sholi be done in ctccordarxe with dll opplicoble ?'Yate af MiaqesciFa Stntutes qnd City of Eogan OrdinqrnCes.
?aiiltlinn Offieinl , t ?fe , ,
? ..
.
? .. , ?. ?_ : . . . . ...
. ?:?.. ? . . _ .. . .. . . .
, .
".... : .. ,' . .... ,_ .:.. . .
. . .. . .
? . ? . , .. ? ?? ??? ? . .. ? ' . . . .
f
f . . . ? ... ?. ' , ??-. r' ...
y-
?
f
, • ,N. v , ?....
?
y.
.... :?
_. .
.?
ool
• ' ?' . . ? . . ? ,.
?-
' 17
. , :.
6 . ,_ .
. _
.
.
.
.. _? .
? . . .
... . ? . . . .,:
C1t1eS D1glt al Qualily Control
The following image represents the best
available image from the original page.
Every effort was made to capture the content
from the original page.
?s# .2 .? ?7? PLtlFAB1NG P'ERAAIT Permit No. 1
1J
CiTY OF EAf3AN
Fee
Fill in numbered sPeces S/C
TYpe or Print /egibly Tot.
1. Date C) 2. Installation Cost
3. Job Address ' LotBik. 7 Tract
r
n
4. Owner
5. Contractor Phone
.
.
6. Address
f .
.
s `
7. City State Zip t .
8. Building Type: Residentiai q-' Cammercial O Institutional ?
9. Work Description: New El Add ? Alter ? Repair ?
10. Describe
11,
` 42. t twreby oer#ify #hat 1he above informatian is trus arrd ctrrrec#, and 1Wee to
mmp1Y with mii c?rdina and s governing thia type of wrork.
- Sigried. -7' for
Rttu?? FkW
No,
` Fixtures
Water Closet No. Fixtures
CesspooUDrainfield
Bath tubs Se
tic Tank
% Lavatory p
Softner
Shower Wel l
Kitchen Sink
Urinal/Bidet Other
Laundry Tray
Floor Drains
Drinking Ftn.
'
Slop Sink
Gas Piping Outlets
?.?
„?,.?T,,;..?,
a -? _
.:' MECHANICA4RMIT PermkNa.
CIT'Y t?P EAOAN
Fee
?
fill in numberL4 spaces S/C `
Type or Print l*illy Tot.
1. Date 2. Installation Cost
,.
3. Job Address ?,bt?Bik. 7 Tract `?:
4. Owner ...?. ,
5 Contractor,
6. Address
7. City
8. Building Type: Residential El
9. Work Description: New 0
10. Describe
11.
12. dhem-bY-mrtify that the above ;fiformatican is true and cnrnacti, and 1agree t4
comply uvita a11 ardinantes antl r.odes gcrvemir`g this type of wurk.
`.
fOt'
R F?nai ,
lropectt'C}atS: Datt lnsp. tJBt.e ittsp. ?,._.
TWs Is yo?t #ormit when rru rad atxtf +appt*ved.
A d , >. VT"4F t? EA(" 4544100
n i
, . _.. ?
Phone
_ State Zip
Commercial ? Institutional ?
Add ? Alter ? Repair ?
Fuel Type
No, Eaujpment BTU - M. Ea.
Forced Air - Na- ` Equipment CFM
Mfg. Air Handling:
Boilers
Mfg
. Mech. Exhaust
Unit Heater
Mfg. Othe
Air Cond. r
AAfg.
Gas, Piping Outlets
?-7 3 PLUMBlNG PERMIT
PACeipt Wermit No. b 13
CITY 0f' EAGAN ,
?--? 40
Fee
Fill 1n numbered smces S/G ,..:1?
Type or P?int 1egibfy Tot. -S- -?`?
1. Date C-3 2, instatlation Cost
'`?.iLq,,2?
3. Jab Address ? Blk.
7_ 7ract
r
4. Owner
4 r
5. Contractor •.??>r1t ?'r?L?-/? r?;f-- ??' ?"? Phone
X
6. Address
7. City State; Zip
8. Building Type: :Residential Commercial ? institutional O
9. Work Description:
10. Describe
11.
New t] Add ? Alter ? Repair ?
No. Fixtures
Water Closet No. Fixtures
Cess
infield
ool/Dr
$ath tubs p
a
Se
ti
nk
T
Lavatory ? p
c
a
S
ftn
r
Shower e
o
Well
Kitchen Sink
Urinal/Bidet Other
Laundry Tray
Floor Drains -
Drinking Ftn.
Slop Sink
Gas Piping Outlets
12. 1 hereby certify that the above information is true and correct, and I agree to
comply wit ordinances and ?04 es governing this type of work.
Signed :?
T
Rough F inal
Inspec#ions: Date Insp. Date Insp.
TMis is youc-.permtt when numbered and approved.
Appr'4ved :k: L_!?TY CtF EACiAN 464$100
??_ ?
Cities Digital Qualily Control
? .
The following irnage represents the best
available image from the original page.
Every effort was made to capture the content
from the original page.
CASH RECEiPT ?
C1TY 4F EAGAN
?
3795 PILOT KNOB RQAD
EAGAN, M1NN.ESOTA 55122
r--.
DATE 19
. . . Fr? .. . :
RECEIVBD ? • ?
FRObI. ? ? ? / . ? _
a rrt aUN T $
,.DOLLAR$ -
. . ? . 'f o.o .
. ? . ? ..,,....r . ? .
Q casH ?..-? cH€eK
.."°
7`'r
; Z ;?t.?, 1. _..?'` ?./` ? ? '%:: ?'?`>
?
FUND ?. '? CODE ?AMOUN'1' '
? . ? ! '".> . . . . ?'4 4 ?r y ;°'^g
. . . . ,
.??1, ..ry .
. ?
. . ?, .
?:.'
?.?...: ?
. . .. . . . ? : . . ! ?'-?
{ 57
. . ?.? i,: . .
, ..E -., ° ?d r•'x ?,J
T Thank Yattf'
..BY-^
? White-•PaYers CoPY
Yellaw-Posting GOPY
Pink-File CapY. ???
CITY OF EAGAN Remarks
Addition HILLTOP ESTATES ?ot 16 Bik 7 Parc'ei _
owner ` street 4158 Blueberry Circle State Eagan, MIlV 55123
Improvement
--- - Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date
- -
STREETSURF. 1980 ?36.72 133.67 _1 935.71 A011437 9-16-82
STREET RESTOR.
_ --
GRADING
- -- - -
SAN SEW TRUNK 1973 172 _ 14 86.14 A011437 9-16-82
-_--
* SEWER LATERAL
19$0
3482 _
2437.84
WATERMAIN
-
* WATER LATERAL '
1980
-
? WATER AREA
198i1
-
*_.Services 1980
_-
,t STORM SEW TRK
11980
* STORM SEW LAT 980
CURB & GUTTER
SIDEWALK
STREET UGHT
ROAD UNIT -13-82
WATER CONN. 420.00 -
BUfLDING PER.
--
75111
--
SAC - -- n n
--
_
PARK _-
-
?
, .?
ti
?f ?0/
1985 BUILDING PERMIIT APPLICATION - CITY OF EAGAN
NOTE: ALL CONTRACTORS l4UST BE LICENSED WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN
INCLUDE 2 SETS OF PLANS
3 CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY
1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS
To Be Used For :
Ic- Valuation: ,190 Date:
Owner^_ ;??IS(o?y
Address
City/Zip Code
?
Phone 2-_ S p
Contractor Address
Site Address : 6 1 (?,? OFFICE USE ONLY
Lot: ? Block -2 Sect/Sub Erect ? Occupancy
Remodel Zorring
Parcel #
Repair Type of Canst !
City/Zip Code
Phone
Arch./Engr.
Address
City/Zip Code
Phone #
Enlarge ? # of Stories
Move Length
Demolish Depth
Grade Sq Ft
APPROVALS
Assessments Permit a§=
Water/Sewer Surcharge
Police Plan Review
Fire SAC
Engr Water Conn
Planner Water Meter
Council Road Unit
Bldg Off(, j Parks
APC Treatment P1
Variance
TOTA 7
L
?
crrY oF EAGaN
9795 Pilot Knob Raad l:agan, MN 56122 N0 7514
J PHONE: 454-8100
` 3 ??
l
BUILDING PERMIT Receipt #
To be used for SP DW/GM Est. Value $114r000
. Date Se Ptember I-A , 19-a2_
$158 Hlt26berry Ci7CC].!t
Site Address Erect 11 Occupancy R-3
I.ot 16 Block 7 Sec/Sub.B3?ltOP EStBtOft Alter p Zoning R 1
Parcel # ].0 33000 16t3 (?9
Repoir p
Fire Zone ?
Enlarge Q Type of Const. v
m Name DeYe1Op@1"S CbnSt2'tiCtia11 Move ? Stories
Z Address 1101 E. Cliff RC?a$ Demolish p Length Q
? Ci BUrnan'11$ Phone $90"6194 Grode ? Depth ?? Sq. Ft.
Approvals Fees
4
o e
Address Assessment
?
~ Water & Sew.
Cit Phone
??
Pol ice
?
F W Name
Fire
Address Eng.
<W Ci Phone Plonner
Councii
I hereby ocknowledge that I have read this application and state that gldg. Off.
the information is correct and ogree to comply with oll upplicable
Stote of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eogan Ordinances. p Nam
??
APC
Signoture of Permittee
A Buiiding Permif is issued to: ??elQ??s Constmet
all work sholl be done in accordonce with oll opplicab a ?Mu
Building Officiol l""""
Permit 1100. Vu
Surchorge 57.04
Plon check 234+00
SAC 525.40
Water Conn420*00
Woter Meter 60 • 00
Rood Unit 240•
Total 82004 . (3O
_ on the express condition thnt
Ciry of Eagan Ordinances.
. .??
\ 4?.??? . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
CI'I'i' OF EAGAN Inc lude 2 sets af plans,
1 site glan wjelevations &
u? BUILDING PE_RMIT APPLTCATION 1 set of erexgy ca3.culations.
„ 4- Gco?-
To Be Usec1 Far Valuation ? Date ?I.-
Site Pddre ss s OFFICE USE ONLY
Lot Blc>ck ? Sec. /Sub. \? s?, Erect occupancy
Parcel # c 10 3 3 vo o /(00 0-7 Alter Zoning
Repair Fire Zone
Owner' p? Enlarge 3'ype of Const.
Nbve # Stories J
Acldress: &o,%=? Demolish Front 7 ft.
CitY/Zip Code: e/,l- c- Grade Depth 3s? ft.
Phone # : D , APPMVALS FEES
Contractor: Assessments Permi.t Y08 ?
Address• Water/S?r Surcharge ?'7 --
' Police Plan Check
City/Zip Code: Fire SAC .-.-
Fhone #: ?g• Water Conn. ?r? ?
Planner Water Meter 610
?
Council Road Unit ;z?yd ?-
Arch-/Eng• : Bldg. Off.
Address: ApC
C.ity/Zip Code:
? t
Phone #; 'IC7i'AL o?? 00
?
?
? qo?
?
?LV I
?
( 3,5 3
?
1 t.3
srtiPicate forr
x ` & Curry 8'1( 78
Survey for : L
Developers Gonst, Inc.
1101 Cliff Rd.,
Burnsville Mn' DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
LANDSURVEVOR
Raqistyed Undfr Laws of The State ot Minnesota
2978 - 148TH 3TREfT W. - BOX M ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 56Q68 PHONE 812 423-1769
SURVEYUR'SCERTIFICATE 87p31'3?`E
. h
-? D Denotes set wood hub & tack fV". -: R 5
/25'41)enotes exiating elevation . ?
lo Denotes proposed eleuation /
-?---- Denotes direet3on of surface
water I ?
Proposed -garage floor 19
elev. - /oZ.o . W I
'v5h1 J t co
oL 7' 1 0
" House staked August
20, 1982
_ 0r
?
/
Ia
a
7oP i??a? J : ?„
Cb f _
15•oo ?
ti° ?6??`".? .?_
tn• /p?
Tp ?Q /?? /f e? ?? ?' ?` ?'' p .? t?a
PRoPa?-.-E?J
1 ' (08 ?P`v
Alt 7
?4?6 ?a ?? ?--- -- ??p°~? ?c? ? ?k3 M ,?,,tt,?,.ti , ?? ?' N .
?? .. ? ?n
• c? d
%
??
,
,61 aq ?
I hereby QeartiPy that thiffi
is a tr?u and correct repre-
L U E'F3 $entation ct Lot 16, Blvck 7,
HZLLTOP ESTATBS, according to the
L E,,, recordsd pist thtrscsf, Dakota County,
-r Cma TcP 4 Minnea0ta.
Datscl: Oo+bober 10, 1979
`"•A 'gq,x
Approved Por Dunn & Curry Rem1. f Eatate Management, Tna. ?
.. F ?? ?w
by : MINNESOTA REGISTR ION N0. 8625
EXTERi OR EP?VEI.OPE A%,IERliGE
? ?
, ?U CQMPUi'A"(' i ON ??..
. R:
Oi,thlE?
S I T£ /1DDRESS :
? 11,i14;/7
CONTRAC70 R: DAT E : PNONE :.???'J.
D£TERMIr1E VlQRK IPiG SOUARE FdOTAGE OF EACH:
1. TOTAL EXPOSED 4JALL AREA........
'! _
sq
ft
x
'iuii
./? ¦
,.'??Cl, _Jr .
?
2. 70TAL ROOF/CEILING AREA,....... s ft x slUll
. -.. q
?.... y. ?.._ y?. ???r..?.?
TOTAL EXPOSED 1JALl AREA CALCULATIhNS; '
Total exposed wa11 -
area above fioor........ ,,.-9??; Sq ft .
a) 7ota1 wall window area: '
i?=,, l.i.., 9lazed
. ... .
sq
ft
x
iiuii
' '
_
glazed.....,
sq
ft
x
JIUII
? ...-_.r.?.._...
b) Total door area ..... ..., . ?4?rO sq ft x "Ulf ' , •?.7 ? ,' , ,
c) • Total sl iding glass door a.rea:' \ 7 6C,
---- g 1 a ze d.:..
s q
f t
-x
, IU!l
qlazed..,..?. sq ft x "U`' ? ---
a
-. .
--
d)
7o t a l f f rep l a ce wa 11 a rea
?-------
-" s q
f t
x
''U" J ? -
n
?
.
• e) Total wall framing area • ----
(Averaqe ] 09;) . . . . . . . . . . . ' ,J Sq ft x iiui, ??32?-
' f)
Total net walt area above ?
floor (insulated)....... sq ft x "U"
?C?r,''?r' ,?
??D,?•?
9) Total rim Joist.area, ,,.. Sq ft x liuii Ll
,..? . .. 1 . M??
Total foundation ' .
area (Exposed) .......... sq. ft ,
h) Totai foundatton
window area . ............ IG sq fC x ??U"
t} Tota 1 net founcla t i on '
a rea above c}r`adeti ? . . . . ? : •?i' o sq f t x r?U" Vo
3
' , T07AL,a) Chru t)
If'ite
. S.fi.C. m ?3 is the same as, or less
Sect(on 6006 (c) 2 than item fl, yo u have met t
• he intent of
.
.
f?. TOTAL EXPOSED RAQF/CE i L! NG CALCULl171 QtaS : , `•
Total exposed . , '
raof/cei l ing area....... l -T ? sq ft
7ota} skyl taht area....... Sq ft x 14ull
k) Total roof/ceillnq framinq ?.
. area (Avera4e 109;) . . . . . '/../r_ sq ft x "U"
t) 7otal net insutated
roof/ceilin9 area....... sq ft x?iui 1 6?
.
1"OYAL thru i ):
if total oF "Jj ts the same as, or less than P2, you have meC the intent of , S. a. C. Sect i on 6606 (c) ].
• ,..• ;, ?a' . ,,,. •>;:;:,'??, , y. .
. , . ,
•,. .
. ,. .
. .,, , • ... •' _ . ,,
• ' _. . ALTERFaATE DU ! LQ I P!G ENVEL.OPE DES I GN •
To utilize the total envelope system method,.the values established by the sum ot ttems #3 and #4 shali not be greater than the sum of items Nl and #2.
.. ` 516 " '-3T + 7? -:2 1"?i ¢ ??? ('7•??? //. .. •
. . w?+ . . . .. . . . .
.
. . w __ . . . . . .
CE R7 I F! C A T I 01•1
i hereby certify that 1 have calcuiated the "U" factors and "R"
values hereln ancl tliat the builcllnci here clescrihcrl meets or exceecls the State
of Minnesota Ener4y Conservation Act. ,
,. .
j? ` ; . /!?/ ???i; ??- •
• Slqnature
? . .. . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . , . . .
r
?
?..?---?-
r
AI R.
FLOw
VENTED
. ..r ?.11??.'. I i'.111 j I Ili.
. f . . . ,. . r,?._---.?.?.... . . .
CCILiII('?' SECTlOI1 (l11SUlATEp); . ) intcrior air ftlm n.h1,
? . 2 7 ? J'/:>, ? ?%.? ?,? •
?. (L/r?i?( <i(;? C}[)
? 3 G?, j+ Cxterior
a i r film.'(sttll)
TOTAL R
11 °. 1/R -=
?. ?5 CE1l,lNG FRAMING SECTI.ON;
?•:J 1 InCerlor airfilm
r• ?
. ?'.?: '?7 .? ? _.????/1 '.r ,{•^,(?.. ' . . . a 'J?f . .
„ T
VENTED
.?.i C?i?. • ? .
14 . Interior air fi )m s t i 11 q, 1:
i nches sof t woT `. . Z,1, ;,34- . .. . : TOTAL' R
U=1/Re??f}A7. .
CEILItdG SEr,Tlorl (IrlsRATE p) : : ? , , ,' •. .
lnterior ai r fi'im . n.61
2 •-----
3 . :
Exterior'air, fllm sti11 tl. 1
•,? TQTAI R ._
.._.`
U ? 11R
, . .?...
CEILIN, FRAMIPlr, SECTIOhl: ` l- interior air film 0.61 .
' z .
. 3
f:xterior air filrn sti}1 t1.
5 inches.soft wood
TOTIIL R =
. U= 1/R-
, ..._.;._.
? . , •
1 Ins ide ai r f i lm n.At'
2
3 .
5 Outsicle air film n,17 ? .
. . TOT/ll R
? ? . . . .. . . ?? . .. . . . . . : M?. ? . ? ?
..•lllS l (<l)f ,r I ()P! (Z U1L.l11:
-4
WALL RnKiric sECTIoN:
? Interior air film
2 i, -. /: - %'
3 i nches sof ti•rood,
? - . fj??. .? . .`7 /??i'.-:'•r" .f..
['j 0.17
A Exterior ai r f i lm
? ,. ..._..?
? ? ?U? ? ?/R ¦??????1/>,,,i?. -
, r-----
• a1Ht,L SECTl OP! ( I NSULATE.Q) •
? ?. Interior air film?'
? ( 3 l,i;
!{ •?"/ , , ?
------------- -
?
i '??;
? Exterior ai?r f i lm
; TOTAL ?,R:
. U I/R
, .
RIM JOIST SECTION: n,?R .,
1 lnterior a1r film'
? 2 '> %::r /? r,2 ??r T.!'r /_ • : f 3• l_? C?
. ? . -_ \? . ..J. .J..-, ?i.,l; ?'iIC/J . ? "/•?Yi! .
"'' 7 ?
? ----( fi, E x t e r i o r- a i r f 11 m ? 0,17
: 'fOTAL R ¢ ?,!?'?`_l.
U 1/R
4 ,
' FOUNDAT I Ot! SECT I ON : ? nA8
•? • ---{? Interior air film
? 2 ,?;-•. -.-r
? /,.:? '?" ?-'t •iy r' /*`?,?%i? .C?
a; 4 FxtPrior air film ? tt?17
a? r; r,???r ?Aj,!'? ?c•` h ,
TQTAL R = ;
W
M7
. v= 1/R-
S '------
SLAf3 Otd G RADE •
. . . .. •r? •.? • ? -?? "?' ?? ? Q• ?.
. . ? ? ? ? ? ?? - ? . ? •( ?? . ;
? ) ':4, ', . . ? ?? ?? •-` f y? ? /1. 10'` ?• ? .! 1 Q
. , . ? ?; ? . : ,' C? b A ?i •',, ; ? ? • al ? « ?:, ? • . ? , `-? . . ? .
??, ? . a i,? ? ? ;,'.. ?; • ? ,?? ..
. , ;• -- -
v •'? ? ( ?????fl, ? . Q `
.? ` / ??` •1 t / // ? •(I •??. I• ?..? ? / ? ? ? ..•:. 1 ,.. .., ' • `?yI
? ? • , ?
',/ ?'Y?t . ? . . . . ' . '? ? . ?1 • ?',•:,; ? ?
? ' ?? ? ' ? ,•? `I t ? r ??.' ? ? I , • 41 l
•[? ? ?? ?'1 ? • ? . ? ? ? ' ' ? ? \ ? / • ? ?: , ?? ? '. ? ? • . 1 . '
1 ?
U
• ' ,Q ? ? ?
?.
,
r ? .V . + ,. ? •? ,
Clty OF
3830 PILOT KIVOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EA6AN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 28, 1986
MR ED DANNECKER
4154 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE
EAGAN MN 55123
Re: Lots 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16, Block 7, Hilltop Estates
Backyard Drainage Problem
Dear Mr. Dannecker:
I am in receipt of your letter of May 13 wherein
problems associated with draining the rear yard
above-referenced lots. In researching our files, I
this problem has previously been identified prior to
the houses on Lots 14 and 15 with a recommended
prepared by james R. Hill, Znc., on September 22,
enclosed for your information.
On April 28 of this year, ou
Peterson, responded to similar
4150 BlueAerry Circle (Lot ].Fl
enclosed for your information.1`?
BEA BLOM9UIST
Mavor
iHOnnAS EGAiv
JAMES A SMtiH
VIC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
f.:ou?cii MemUers
THOMAS HEDGES
city ndm?imaAOr
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
CiN ?erlc
you identified
areas of the
have found that
construction of
solution being
1983, which is
r Chief Building Official, Mr. Dale
concern raised by Mr. Steve Reed, of
). A copy of that letter is also
The existing low area along these corimon lot lines was not a major
drainage concern in consideration of developing the overall
subdivision, Hilltop Estates. Several similar type drainage
situations are usually resolved through proper site planning and
yard landscaping by the individual builders of each lot.
Unfortunately, when Lot 16 was developed, the walkout elevation of
that house was placed too low to allow adequate fill to be placed in
the downstream lots (14 and 15) to ensure minimum surface flow out
to Blueberry Circle.
After inspecting the site during the early morning hours of May 21,
I do not feel you will have a severe problem. :iowever, the only way
to be totally sure would be the installation of a gravity storm
sewer system as referenced in your letter. However, with no other
storm sewer facilities in the immediate vicinity, this type of
installation would involve considezable expense ($10,000 +). The
financing of similar type public improvements is usually achieved
through special assessnents against benefitted properties. In this
case, they would be the five lots referenced above. In order for
the Council to consider the expenditure of dollars and the
subsequent assessment to private property or expenditure of public
funds to finance this project, it would require the petition of at
THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNIIY
MR ED DANNECKER
MAY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
?, ..
.,
s ?? ' •'?
least two of the five property owners to initiate a feasibility
report. Upon completion of this report, a formal public hearing
would be held at which time the Council would hope that more than
51$ of the affected property owners would support such a project.
In order to initiate this process, I have enclosed a copy of the
Cit-y's standard petition form which must be submitted to the Council
before any formal study can be initiated beyond what has been
performed to date by the d2veloper's engineer.
Until there has been sufficient support for this public improvement,
the resolution of this problem remains one to be resolved between
the affected property owners, their builders and/or developer.
Sincerely, ?homas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Vlorks
TAC/jj
cc: Dale Peterson, Chief Building Official
Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation
Jim Hill, James R. Hill, Inc.
Enclosure
RECEjV'?
0
Ger-? /3tx 7
'Alj d'arap ??r4
Mr. Thomas Colbert 5_13-86
Eagan City Offices
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55123
Dear Mr. Colbert, ,
I currently have excess ponding of rainwater at the rear of my lot. The
water is runoff from.a number of adjacent lots which has resulted in
significant accumulation. The size oP the pond is'approximately 70 by ,
20 by 3 feet deep. - I have a number oP concerns about the ponding. '
1)Foremost is safety. There are many children in the neighborhood. The
pond poses a tiigh potential of an accidental drowning. On one occurance
earlier this year, a 7 year old boy became stuck in the pond because
of the suction of the mud and required assistance to get out.
2)Towards the end of April,a second pond developed posing a threat to
m9 home and my neighbors. The water levels are such that water could
anter through the basement level windowa. f
?
3}A storm pipe was in`stalled to drain water from the ponding area to
the street. The elevation of the pipe is such that it is ineffective.
I am convieed that my baek yard will be submersed before the pipe
would be utilized.
There needs to be an arrangement to allow for proper drainage. I
understand there are two alternate grading plans on file, neither of
w.hich have been implemented at this time. I do not have confidence tha't
either of the plans will provide a total,long lasting solution,
I request the city of Eagan conduct a Peasibility study on the
placement of a storm sewer in the area of the ponding to resolve the
problem.
There are a number of factors that limit the number of alternatives.
The storm sewer will provide the best results. 4 prompt response from
the city ma-y be necessary to prevent dama.ge from flooding.
Sincerely,
'CC : Dan Osborn
Steve Reed Ed Darinecker
4154 Blueberry Circle .
Phone W-921-1851
, x-452-975'1
, , .;, .
L/ s? e7
4
.
???r ?
.
oF eagan
3830 PILpT KN08 ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PNONE: (612) 454-8100
BEA BLOMQUISf
Movor
THOMEIS EGAN
• JAMES A. SMtiH
VIC EILISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Mempen
THOMAS NEDGES
Ciry lwmtrusuoro.
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
GN Ciedc
April 28, 1986
MR STEVE REED
4150 BLUEBERRY CIR
EAGAN, MN 55123
RE: DRAINIGE OF L 14, 15 & 16, B 79 HII,LTOP ESTATES.
Dear Mr. Reed:
In response to your phone eall of April 18, wherein you indicated at that time
you did not want water standing on your property nor did you want any trees
removed for filling, I am enclosing a copy of the transmittal from the
Engineer, Mr. James Hill, to the developers of Hilltop Estates, Sienna
Corporation, with proposed solutions to the drainage problem of the above
lots.
The proposed solutions to the drainage concerns were diseussed with you at the
time eonstruction was started on your home in September of 1984. At that
time, Sunshine Construction and you agreed to fill the rear yards and in p2ace
of the drainage swale use a buried drainage pipe which was done. If presently
you do not want the rear yard filled and the trees removed, you have two
alternatives left - the proposed wet well or ponding in your rear yard. Sincerely,
Dale S. Peterson
Chief Building Official DSP/js
CC: Craig Knudsen - City Engineering Technician
Sienna Corporation
Sunshine Construction
THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNITY
James
?
Ri
iil ? ?
s? a?.,. ? r';
N;1? ti s
Oc-tober. 6, 1983
Mr. Dale Peterson
Building Inspector
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
w n K ?
RE: LOT?,? 14 AND ?.5' BLOCK 7`??
?F{ I LLTbP ' ESTAT;ES?
Dear Mr. Peterson:
At the request of Sienna Corporation, we have taken field e7evations on
Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 7 to determine existing conditions for the
purpose of suggesting methods of draining the rear yards of said lots.
14e have attached a plan with elevations and suggestions for your review
and for assistance to the builder when constructing homes on Lots 14 and'
15. You will note that the existing rear yard grade of the home on Lot 16
is 892.6 which,along with the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15, should drain
to the curb on Blueberry Circle which is at an elevation of 891.9.
Two methods are availab7e:
One: Fill the rear yards af Lots 14 and 15 so that a drainage
swale can be maintained from Lot 16 thru Lot 15 and then
to the street: This wi11 require up to six feet of fill
in the rear yards of Lots 14 and 15 and some filling on
Lot 16; the swa7e wi11 only be a 0.3'+ percent grade
because of the existing house grade on Lot 16. The
drainage swale shown across the corner of Lot 14 and
thru Lot 15 wiT1 have to be provided with an easement.
Two: A second method for drainage would be to not fill the
rear yards, let water pond, provide for an emergency
overflow swale as shown on the attached drawings,'and
construct a"wet well" that may or may not slowly drain
the ponding area. One or two soil borings should be
required to determine if and at what depth a sandy
stratum can be found. The effectiveness of the "wet well"
will depend on the type of soiT, perkolation, and mainte-
nance.
8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH • BLOOMlNGTON • MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-884-3029 ?
;?. . ,_.. ??.? ???4?.. ?? ,?;,.? .}•???:.?.,. i
j Mr. Dale Peterson
? RE: LOTS 14 AND 15, BtOCK 7
?
; HILLTOP ESTATES
? October 6,:1983
Pa9e 2
The emergency swale must be constructed and maintained
so.that homes are not flooded. The swale must have an
easement across Lat 14. In either method, Lot 15 must -
provide for (in aeed) drainage of adjacent 1ots.
Sincere7y, -
JAh1ES R. HILL, INC.
James R. Hill ,
JRH/sh
Enclosure
cc: Sienna
Bob Rosene
Loren Spande
? F-% 1 1•11 •
?
lnc.
? i
?
JAG:??
jc? ?r?A?n11hx C-- @200 tlur?bolclt Avc SU .
985 X891a,? Bloomi;i0;un, MN S:i43j
•(' 1( ?'? ? ? / / 1
Bqi,S 89'?,9 q?2 •3 ?, I
? 1^ ? • ly '
a f .?
? pg7,7 .
? -r0 G1??140
? 89s.4
? F68q,1
?
6yl,`I
w?l?f?L?' 867.6 ?f : / r?\" ,ip,,,,,,???'?J?Q.L X 94s 2 I r?
B7t,?,? 815•? ?11A "QB ?''"'?,? 910.1 I
ly? LeVto %
? • ?? ? ?
tx 7 ? ?15?'!N? ??Z
y 9f,,, 8.?, vusF , T ?
ra
,
w
??
C?? ?yt ios:s
? 4iL
r
?' . . .
/ a? ?
?5? ? ?- ?d?fr?L ?`"/?? ?/!-,???VCj'
, /LQ S?''
,dvj/? yftj?r C,? 7.5 ? ?? ??tAlnU h?
B1 3.Y p ,ppr ?
1 ??
?(J ?? ,t 98,? 2 //1/G1' ,? i 1 O r
x9
? s93q
gyq.9 ??2•3
a x ? ELV I?"i \
? p8S(P?
w
J F689 x
(?1 Cor?l'TG uc-i
64,At,.F. p9?,c lt x9+s2 ??P
9tz,? r Bi1p' "gBYb ? ? Bfo•7
812 ,o x s9a,? ??;?T
00
'v
?
J,`l'...:;; 3i. i;1Ll,lj;t;.
8200 Hum6oldl qve
BloomiriSo
gton, MN 55431
??oe e
IY
/?(? '? 9y17r +?na ? ?, ' ? 4?'a> l; Q I
8 k ,
AousE 810 1 = ?I
-V. Z 2-
. 2,
aLL
7c
. •?92 - ?? ??ZD?' ? /
? ? `? ? o? Q`?
?jT-C
? ? ???-v r???? ??$•83?
9
, 2?3
? p.LriA1?.11+1?G' ??"?. ,/?
? 9°.w ? ?UV
? x ?
? b93 q
A 4 89i,S' g9'?,9 yi2•3
?
a
!11 ps7,7
X B+S. t I f,?
Btt,?Te S1L? ?81to. ,,88 810•7
? ?Q x811.o
jtlt7Ac;UQL„
'`.
'?C1STIkIC
C. k,q ?`
?Ea-r'» /T . ? Ic
/QO
?f 1 ? 0 5o X I ov =.5P 4'6 ?- t
ysoo x
82C3 Humboidt,-y.,
91ooc,nugton.
?
ACr.-
lGkr' ?
;
?• ? ?
? ?
s I
lames R.
July 21, 1986
Mr. Rodnep D. Hardy
Sienna Corporation
4940 Viking Drive
Suite 608 .
Minneapolis, MN 55435
RECElVEO vU? 2 on IS80
RE: HILLTOP ESTATES
LOTS 14, 15 & 16, BLOCR 7- DRAINAGE CONCERNS
Dear Mr. Hardy;
At your request, we have reviewed the recent soils report
by GME and our field notes taken in June of 1986. Based
on this information, we feel there are four alternatives
to reduce the drainage problem within the rear of lots
14, 15 and 16.
1.) Fill the low lying area to a suitable elevation such
that the runoff flows to Blueberry Circle. This
alternative would require removal of much of the
existing vegetation. This alternative was pre-
viouslp proposed in our letter of October 6, 1983
to Dale Peterson, City Building Inspector.
2.) Fill the low lying area within lot 15 onlq to a .
suitable elevation such that the runoff flows into
the 12" P.V.C. installed bp the builder. The fill
required would range between 0.5' to 1.5' deep. ;
This would require a minimal amount of disruption to
the existing vegetation. Also, a wet well would be
required at the outlet of the pipe in the front yard
of lot 14. Per the soils report, a wet well can be
constructed in the area of the outlet. As a backup
to the wet well, a provision should be included to
discharge additional water to Blueberry Circle. See
attached for schedule of estimated construction
costs.
3.) Construct a catch basin and sump pump system near
- the inlet of the existing buried drain pipe. The
. surface water would drain into the catch basin, at
?' - which time the sump pump would be activated to pump
the water via the existing drain pipe. A wet well
as described in alternative #2, would also be
required in the front pard of lot 14. See attached
• •
ill, inc.
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS
8200 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SQUTH • BLOOMINGTON • MINNESOTA• 55431 • 612-8843029 t
!
schedule for estimated construction costs. The
issues to be resolved with this solution are as ,
follows.
1) ownership and maintenance costs of pump?
2) variation of weather conditions - the pump must
be removed during the winter season. (pump wt.
= 110 lbs)
3) the pump must be wired to a house - who pays
electrical costs? or how shared?
4) what happens if electricitp goes out?
4.) Install a catch basin in the low lying area and run
the storm sewer line into the existing city storm
sewer system under a public improvement project.
See attached plan and schedule of costs. Given the four alternatives, we would recommend alter-
native number 4 as the best solution to the drainage
concern. However because of the high cost to each of the
three benefitting lots, we feel that alternative number 2
would be the next best. Within all of the alternatives,
ponding map still occur depending on the duration and
intensity of a storm. This is because the drain pipe or
sewer system can only handle so much water at a given
time. Also, there is only approximately 1.5'+ from the
low lying area to the walkout elevation of lot 16 before
flooding would occur.
If you have any questions or require further information
with regard to this matte'r, please advise. _
Sincerely,
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
.
6?eter A. Bishop, E.
Vice President
cc: Tom Colbert - City of Eagan
Dale Peterson - City of Eagan
Attachments
-0, a
4
?,. 17 1 J:1 I:.,? ?-.
a
Jdt I 1CJ I\. n i i i, 11 iL.
? ?
HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 2
Estimated Construction Costs
Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum 600.00
(off site disposal)
Barrow material 80 cu.yd. @ 5.00/cu.yd. 400.00
to fill hole
Restoration - Sodding 220 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 440.00
Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00
on Lot 14
$2,640.00
+ 10% Contingencies 260.00
Total Estimated
Construction Casts $2,900.00 -
? . "
. .
LJ . I i ...? ?.
Jcu I 1Cz) ix. I I i i i, u i%.. ?
f '
HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 3
Estimated Construction Costs
Catch Basin Sump . Lump Sum $ 1,125.00
(with discharge pipe)
Pump & High Level Lump Sum 3,610.00
Controls (See attached
details)
Electrical Wiring Lump Sum 425.00
Restoration - Sodding 150 sq.yd. @ 2.00/sq.yd. 300.00
Construct Wet Well Lump Sum 1,200.00
on Lot 14
$ 6,660.00
+ 10% Contingencies 660.00
Total Estimated $ 7,720.00
Construction Costs
?
. .
". i i ......
Jdl I ICJ 1\. I III1/ 11 Il..
HILLTOP ESTATES
B`?E o`??_
KN
WZ
a
..1
13 12
s?
14 , sPROPOSED EE OE?'AIL CB
15
,
m
F o
RRY
?c
?s
\
N .
11.
16 NO SCALE
17
-? BEEHIVE CASTING
;• ?
,ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
' --DISCHARGE LINE T0 EXISTING
; 12" bRAIP! PIPE _
:
: .
.'
SUMP PUMP
? • • ? : ?. '. i . : f • ; .
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE
ALTERNATIVE NO. 3'
HILLTOP ESTATES - Alternative No. 4
The third alternative'as mentioned in the GME Consultants,
Inc. report dated June 27, 1986 is to petition the City of
Eagan for a storm sewer system to terminate with a catch
basin being installed in the rear yard area between Lot 14
and 15.
The nearest storm sewer exists at the intersection of
Diffley Road and Blueberry Lane which would require
approximately 640 L.F. of pipe and 3 structures together
with street, boulevard, and driveway restoration. (See
Attached)
The estimated total cost for this storm sewer system is
approximately $28,168.00 based on the following estimated
quantities.
12" R.C.P. CL5
0'-8' DEEP
STANDARD MANHOLE
0'-8' DEEP
STANDARD CATCH
BASIN
RESTORATION OF
BOULEVARDS
STREET RESTORATION
DRIVEWAY RESTORATION
640 L.F. @ 23.00/L.F.
1,000.00
900.00
$20,120.00
2,012.00
6,036.00
$28,168.00
2 EA. @ 800.00 EA.
1 EA. @ 850.00 EA.
525 S.Y. @ 2.00/S.Y.
LUMP SUM
3 EA. @ 300.00 EA.
+ 10% Contingencies
+ 30% City Engineering &
Administrative Costs
Total Estimated Costs
Cost Per Lot $ 9,389.00
(assuming 3 benefitting lots)
? .. Cost Per Lot $ 5,633.00
(assuming 5 benefitting lots)
. .
?.. .,.,•. .. r. n U. ? ? ..? r•
)ar i iCD IX. 1 11111 11 lk.,. I
_l '? .v ... .
. -?d6? L'] ., Z _ , . _ n 6i v .,, n'?_? ? --__ ?0_ ? --- -•- - ?.., , _ : . C
) • ,?? de'
4 0- ?? m '? h _? ?u ? O
`.? ?S9os92 ?' ? .- 46g4?3s„49 tiry ? OD N
ao __ 122 g3 -^ 2? 9 cn ? m
u+o
o? • ?w ?o gERR? i^' 7g051,52E ? a
' 13E m " 3 °'
8 L. 0
? o?s•z= w'?, m N ` 49.71
2
? ? ?'c _ N 01?R? ? ? ?? ?a=16°29'29', m a 89021 Q,
` ?
o m'° , m N 69 S3o ,i
24 R -
09 ?, C? ` ? N oo'(3 •c?3 0; z, 9 SSB3 `?4•1,tq T? ?,??' N
?o?- ,b6a9 0 0•o a_ D3o?0 ? J ,? - TZa3g2o ' tn
? o?m? Qo° ? ooti .0 111.eW BLUEBERRY N
n 02 ,
N 0 D.6o47=1T-?_ bp??p°\o ryo
?? ry ? 1?
A1? : y ? W O? o f0 , v i?r" 192 63 Q`(0 <D i
- ? o KN ? ,,
_i2a.oi ;_ ??,.g7--- -. ,. ° 1 m
N. s?p /s 44. _<v-S89°22'53"E - 98.38 '?
? 0 O pti _? Q• N M ? %=93°57'20?? %S'? i9 N
A i
17 0 21 v' °M o
o ? ° 13 : ? ro ? 12
A. m ,n
to ?
„?•.O .:/ = s Om , Q
n7 ti S?o o '
18 0 /62 q4s,? a+M ? Io -- --130.Op _ - i ?L 205.75 - S 87°37'37"E _
0 S83c4107 . "E - -; ,- .
90.00
' I
? S? e3?39., ?? ' ?`'•S3 , • N o ° o? . F -AT ?
3 14
o m ?. 1
' ? ' ?
' 3p v pp O?o I
'\ J5 . . .?t/ O
? oo ?y3 ? 9C' `G ?h?0 ?O , R, $QOO\ ' 16 M
SO jfC ?SS o?CO fL Oa n xSAO 9?SS2Os-o ! ??:..25?0 p•?:b4;72.
? •. c?o 3;W F,? 2, R3• ? '? a? .
'
3O ??,? .,/ c?'? ;-' v, ? O R; ?/ ?3 g9•• ?O 23'3 ?6 0 6 ? F- ? i Z
?, p 20 • B9 / n' o° S?0O- 3? 60,rob p?P?6 •? ?
4j,?.'??01 ? ? C/ ?9s ? ?Q ? %? .? pFtp' ? • , rL6 ?
Q`/O
2000
0 ,?> s69 , ! o °? 3?? F as , t. N5 ` ?
21 o
/° ss?o 17
S°O 0 t' O /4, ,?? `?v • I G; '?,; 52. g4 ?.. Y
.
3t ai2j ?/SF h? E! f g o p F 3j39Oy544 /?? 4=50°33'20„ a
Fo? ?? 69? '
t
?e' .' . 2 Z cr (L -") 32 >0
? 22• ? • ? / -40 22 STOa4
' o : h- rp 4j • o _ ? 9? _. cV
n o0 0 ;,3
?A' ? ? o j o ? ? a• h • S?, w
?Y !o_ `?° '°? °? , l0 c ?l 0 V A. p,s 9g N
a3 ? ?o
o - ? .7 2 a o - S89°30'20"E -' 00'.o ;
-Ng
?34 ^- o 5 3f"yy -- N v I18.91 20 od' ?y0 0? o N`?-
?o ? z Ic v v; ,? - N ?l cv rO p ? N?y? Do 1 3
W y N? .? o An o o.? o _ M vf
3c2p,,• _ j? io lo °' ? o ?? N 0 n? O cs?-
? O ? ? t;; ? , , I V M O
23 ? ?
? v o e m ? N0
o r. N= ? 19 O =
• - ? '- - 130 0 ' a ' 30 --- - - 179.63 - - ' ?0? - 99.28 -- I- - - - -- 101.12- - ? W
?
?
?.. J.
o J ,y
W T EX15i11VC.
0
„ 5To1?M 6?vFR
o; AND
N O. 30 °
r
^, ?
o
Z 509,75
---
F: D ..U 60•w ' IC,
C t r IV I't /? C. ..? • `
? .. ,
1
?.
1..
SNEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
L
. _Ti-. .. ? . .. .
r
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2083 East Center Circle / Minneapolis. MN 55441 / 612/559-1859
June 27, 1986
Sienna Corporation '
4940 Viking Drive, Suite 608
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Attention: Mr. Rod Hardy GME Project No. 1073
RE: Subsurface exploration for proposed back yard drainage
area at Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 7 of Hilltop Estates
in Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen:
As authorized by you on June 11, 1986, we have completed this
subsurface exploration for the proposed back yard drainage area.
Enclosed please find the results of our exploration and the soil
report which we have prepared. Two copies of this ?report have
,
been sent to the above address. Two copies have been sent to Mr.
Harold Bohanon of James R. Hill, Inc. _
INTRODUCTION K
. ?.
Single £amily dwellings have recently been constructed at the
three subject lots in the Hilltop Estates Subdivision.
Groundwater has been observed ponded on the surface in the rear
yards these lots during recent rainy periods. It is also our
understanding that prior to the development of the subdivision,
this area was a naturally-occurring drainage swale and ponding
?.
area. In an attempt to eliminate the water from ponding on the
surface, a storm drain about 12 inches in diameter was installed
from the rear yard area near the property line dividing Lots 14
GEOTECHNICAL o MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS
WILLIAM C. KWASNY. P.E. THOMAS P. VENEMA, P.E. WILUAM E. BLOEMENDAL. E.I.T.
l
Mr. Rod Hardy 2 June 27, 1986
and 15. This drain daylights in the front yard area of Lot' 14.
Due to the existing topography, this drain was not capable of
dewatering- the area. It is now proposed to undertake remedial
measures which would reduce or eliminate water ponding on the
surface. The purpose of this report is to describe the soil and groundwater
conditions encountered in our subsurface exploration; to review
and evaluate these conditions with respect to the proposed
project; and to present recommendations for feasible methods of
reducing the possibility of water ponding on the surfaces of the
rear yards.
FIELD EXPLORATION/LABORATORY TESTING
Two borings were drilled for this project as shown on the enclosed
Soil Boring Location Diagram. The number and locations of the -
borings were chosen by GME Consultants, Inc. and James R. Hill,
Inc. during a site meeting on June 9, 1986. The borings were laid
out in the field by the GME drill crew. Ground surface elevations
at the borings were determined by GME, referenced to the elevation
of the i.nvert of the existing drain. The elevations of the
borings are shown at the top of the respective logp (NVGD Datum).
The borings were drilled with a Mobile B-24 rig. Solid stem
augers were used to advance the borings fu11 depth. The soil
samples were obtained by the split barrel in accordance with
ASTM: D 1586. During sampling, the Standard Penetration Values
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Mr. Rod Hardy 3 June 27, 1986
(N-values, blows per foot) were recorded. These N-values are
shown on the respective boring logs. The recovered soil samples
were preliminarily classified in the field, sealed in glass jars.
to prevent moisture loss, and returned to our laboratory for
examination and classification by a Soil Engineer.
Groundwater levels were noted in the borings during and after
completion of the field operations. These water levels are shown
on the respective logs. A dis`cussion of the groundwater
conditions found in the borings is included under the Site
Conditions section of this report.
The laboratory testing program consisted of a Soil Engineer
examining each sample to determine the major and minor soil
components, while also noting the color, degree of saturation, and
any lenses or seams found in the samples. The soils were
visually/manually classified on the basis of texture and
plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
System (USCS). The letter symbol in parentheses following the
written description on the logs is the estimated group symbol
based on the USCS. A chart describing the properties of the
groups under this system is included in the Appendix of this
report. '
- The Engineer grouped the soils by type into the strata shown on
w
the logs. The stratification lines shown on the logs are
approximate; insitu, the transition between soil types may be
gradual or abrupt in both the horizontal and vertical directions.
GMP rnmcill Te11iTS INC_
t
.
Mr. Rod Aardy 4 June 27, 1986
Particle size analysis of soils representative of the most
granular soil strata observed in each of the borings were
determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM: D 422. As a
part of the testing program, laboratory moisture contents were
determined in accor.dance with ASTM: D 2216. The laboratory
moisture content results are shown on the appropriate boring logs
and on the sieve analysis sheets.
Groundwater levels were noted in th`e borings during and after
completion of the drilling operations. The recorded water levels
are shown in the lower left corner of the respective boring logs.
A discussion of the groundwater conditions found in the borings in
included under the Site Conditions section of this report.
We will retain the soil samples remaining after testing for 30
days after the date of this report. If you wish to have the
samples retained beyond this time, we ask that you please advise us; otherwise, the samples will be discarded.
SITE CONDITIONS
Topography/Surface Features
The ponding area generally runs in a southwest to northeast
direction from the center of Lot 16 to the rear of Lot 14. The`
topography of this area varies from a high elevation of ?
approximately 893 feet to 894 feet adjacent to the rear of the
houses, to a low of approximately 889 feet near the property line
dividing Lots 14 and 15. This area is covered with dense
- GMF f`tllUeul TaNTS. INC_
,
Mr. Rod Hardy 5 June 27, 1986
vegetation varying from brush to large mature trees. Boring 1 was
drilled in the lowlying rear yard area.
The inlet of an approximately 12 inch diameter drain pipe is
located in the rear yard area. The drain runs in a generally
northwesterly direction towards Blueberry Circle and then in a
northeasterly direction to the front yard area of Lot 14 near tlie
intersection of Blueberry Circle and Blueberry Lane. Boring 2 was
drilled near the outfall of the drain. The vegetation in this
immediate area is sparse and includes-low grasses.
Soil Conditions
The soil conditions found in the borings are shown on the
respective logs.
The soil conditions vary at the two boring locations. At boring
1, the surface is covered with approximately 2.5 of dark brown
silty fine to medium sand and clayey sand fill. The fill contains
trace roots and seams of black fine sandy silt. Underlying the
fill and extending to the termination depth of the boring at 20
feet, occur highly stratified soils. These stratified soils
include clayey silt, sandy silt, clayey sands, silty sand, and
sandy clay.' The observed seams-or lenses vary in thickness from
less than 0:.5 feet to nearly 7 feet in thickness. The N-values
within the naturally-occurring non-organic soils at boring 1
varied from 2 to 43 blows per foot, generally increasing with
depth. The N-values indicate that these soils increased from soft
GMF rnluCitITANTS_ INC
Mr. Rod Hardy 6 June 27, 1986
or loose at shallow depth5 to dense or hard at greater depth.
Based on visual observations in the laboratory, particle size
analysis testing were run on the two predominant granular soil
types for use in estimation of the permeability of these soils.
The percent passing the #200 sieve, which is the division between
coarse and fine grained soils, vary from approximately 29% to 34%.
The moisture content of these `same samples varied from
approximately 15% to 17$.
At boring 2, the soils were slightly less stratified. At that
location, the upper most approximately 7 feet consisted of black
and dark brown stratified silty fine to coarse sand and sandy
silt with trace organic content. This upper most 7 feet is
probably fill. Below a depth of 7 feet, the predominant soil type
was fine to coarse sand and silty sand with layers of sandy silt. -
The Standard Penetration Test Resistancies within the naturally-
occurring sandy soils varied from 6 to 24 blows per foot
indicative of a loose to medium dense condition. Based on
laboratory particle size analysis tests, the silt and clay content
of the sandy soils at this site varied from approximately 6$ to
. 18$. Thus, the_ granular soils at boring 2 contain less fines
(particles smaller than the #200 sieve) than those soils
encountered at boring 1.
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Mr. Rod Hardy 7 June 27, 1986
Groundwater Conditions Free groundwater was encountered in each of the two borings during
our relatively brief period of observation. At boring 1, the
groundwater was observed at a depth of 2 feet while drilling. At •
the conclusion of drilling, the water was at 3 feet from the:
surface. At boring 2, located in the front yard area, minor
seepage was observed at a depth of 9 feet while drilling. The
borehole was dry upon completion of t-he drilling and approximately
2 hours later. Laboratory soil moisture content tests results
varied from approximately 15% to 17$ at boring 1, and from
approximately 3% to 9$ at boring 2.
Based on the available data, it can be seen that the groundwater
is at shallower depths and the soils in a wetter condition at
boring 1 than at boring 2. ,
The groundwater levels will vary seasonally and annually,
depending upon local amounts of precipitation, evaporation,
surface runoff, infiltration, and for other reasons. Excavations
extending just a few feet below the existing ground surface in the
rear yard area would likely encounter groundwater infiltration.
The quantity of such infiltration would likely be substantial.
Excavation near the out fall of the existing drain pipe would
encounter less groundwater.
?
_ GMOCnwcturnwre lmr_.
Mr. Rod Hardy 8 June 27, 1986
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand that the site becomes ponded with water during times
of heavy rainfall. A preliminary proposal was presented by others,
to reduce or eliminate the ponding of surface water in this area
was to install a"wet well." Briefly described, a wet well
includes an excavation at the site, to be backfilled with highly
permeable granular soils. The surface water would infiltrate the
granular soils and would then be disp`ersed into the natural soils.
Thus, the surface waters would be allowed to discharge into the
soils at depth.
J
The soil and groundwater conditions at this site do not appear to
be suitable_for construction of a wet well. Suitable naturally-
occurring conditions would include highly permeable granular soils
and a groundwater level at substantial depth. The soils at
boring 1 in the rear yards are stratified and include highly
impermeable layers of silt, clay, and silty and clayey sands.
Laboratory sieve analysis test results for the granular soils
indicate the inclusion of approximately 30% or more silt and
clay. We estimate that the permeability of the granular soils at
that location to be approximately 1 x 10 -6 cm/sec or less.
For a design of a wet well, it is also beneficial to have a
groundwater table which is-relatively deep. At this site, the
?
groundwater was encountered at a very shallow depth on the order
of 2 feet. Such a high existing groundwater table would cause a
mounding condition with the introduction of water from a wet well.
GME rn111aooi7eN7s_ INC_
Mr. Rod Hardy 9 June 27, 1986
That is, as new water were introduced through the wet well, rather
than being quickly dispersed laterally into the existing soils, a
rise in the groundwater (mounding) would occur which would take
extended periods of time to disperse. This wuld effectively
reduce or eliminate infiltration.
The soil conditions at the outfall of the existing drain in the
front yard of Lot 14, are somewhat better suited for construction
of a wet well. The granular soils a`t that location contain less
silt and clay content, on the order of 18% at a depth of 6 to 12
feet and approximately 6$ between the depths of 16 feet and 20
feet. The deeper sand stratum would be suitable for the design of
a wet well. However, these soils are at substantial depth and wet
well construction could be costly. Also, groundwater infiltration
was encountered at a depth of 9 feet at this location.- This
relatively shallow groundwater table would reduce the efficiency.-
of the wet we11. •
We recommend that the proposed wet well not be built in the rear
yard area. It is our opinion that three alternatives exist to the
proposed wet we11. The alternatives may not be as satisfactory
from an asthetic and economic perspective that the. originally
?
proposed wet well. Alternate No. 1 would be to fill the lowlying area to a suitable
elevation such that runoff occurs by flow to Blueberry Circle.
This alternative would require removal of much of the vegetation
that currently occupies the rear yard. It would be possible to
eMc n.,.1-.-nw-c lNe
Mr. Rod Hardy 10 June 27, 1986
replant this area after the earthwork is completed.
As a part of filling the rear yard area to promote surface
drainage, it would be advantageous to partially grade the site to
drain to the existing buried drain pipe at which point it would •
flow to the front yard of Lot 14 where a wet well could be
constructed. A properly designed and constructed wet well in this
area could be feasible:
If filling and replanting the rear yard area are not possible, as
a second alternative, it would be possible to regrade the rear
yard so that the surface water drains to a location near the inlet
of the existing buried drain pipe. At that location, a catch
basin and sump pump would be installed. The surface water would
drain into the catch basin, at which time the sump pump would be
activated and pump the water via the existing drain pipe to a wet
well constructed at the out fall of the drain. As a backup to the
wet well in the front yard, an overflow mechanism should be
included to discharge additional water to the Blueberry Circle
storm sewer system.
As a third, possibly more expensive alternative, it would be
possible to regrade the rear yard to drain to a catch basin in the
rear yard as discussed in Alternate No. 2. For this alternative,
rather than a sump pump removing the water, the water could be
? --
drained by gravity to a suitable discharge location. However, due
to the existing topography of the area, the most suitable
discharge location would likely be at some distance away, probably
GME COIUCIII TANTS_ INC_
Mr. Rod Hardy 11 June 27, 1986
at Diffley Road, or to an existing storm sewer system also at some
distance away. This drain system would have to cross at least 2
existing streets.
GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS This preliminary report has been prepared based on the soil and
groundwater conditions_found in our subsurface exploration, and on
the preliminary data related to us by James R. Hill, Inc. This
report is intended solely for this project at the specific
location discussed.
The soil and groundwater conditions were determined at 2 boring
locations. These conditions are pertinent only at the boring
locations and under the environment existing at the time of our
.. subsurface exploration. Variations in soil and gr_oundwater
conditions were encountered and additional variations probably.
exist that would not become apparent until construction starts.
No warranty, either expressed or implied, is presented in this
report with respect to the soil and groundwater conditions on this
site. It is not warranted to extrapolate soil conditions between
the boring locations themselves.
We would be pleased to supply additional geotechnical
recommendations at which t3me a specific design is considered.- We
ap'preciate the opportunity to be of service to you for this
project. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we
can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to
GME CONSULTANTS, iNC.
? - • .
l
?
JMr. Rod Hardy 12
1
l
.J
?
?
.?
J
J
J
?
?
J
?
?
contact us.
Sincerely,
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Will' m D. Plate, P.E.
Pro " ? t Eng ' eer
%illiam C. Kw ,' .
rincipal Engi `
APPENDIX :
Soil Boring Location Diagram
General Notes
Soil Boring Logs
Sieve Analysis Results
Unified Soil Classification Chart
WDP:WCK:kdk
i h;reb certify thnt plan, specificntion,
or wae prepa byme or nnder my
dirpervisio and that I am n dulq
Reo e ional Enqineer under ths
law e of Mianeaota.
Date Rsv o Z? -
-0,
GME CONSt1LTCNTS. INC
June 27, 1986
I?
6e
qine ?
? i '? • ?./
' B-f 41',
890.7'; . e?
C?. . ? • ' ?'
?a • •
7
?? ' 14 ?- ?'•r?' -
? v? rt
?r W '?? •
\ j J •o ' -
t0
1 ' s S%
P4
JIAO ? i? • ? '?j ???
? s ? r
D' $? ??? I!b, ?
?? ' ? .??__' ? •?J.
890.21
?
. _ / ?, ? ? ? - •, I
• ? ??V ; , "`/?"( ? ? ? D?J r
y y?i
vi ? o
'IV 1? ? '' 'S *
:-
..? ?`
?
'#1
;I SOIL BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM
? LQTS 14, 15 & 16; BLOCK 7
HILLTOP ESTATES
EAGRN, MIPdNESOTA
II SIENNA CORPORATION
I6
. APPROXIMATE
SCALE
0' 25' 50'
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
2083 EAST CENTEA CIRCLE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441
WDP WCK 1073 6-ZO-86
GENERAL NOTES
DRiLLING & SAMPLING SYM80LS: ,
SL . SC with Liner
SS . Spiit 5poon -f2/8" l.O., 2" O.D.; unless OS : Osterberg Sampler - 3" 5helby Tube
otherwix noted HS : Holiow Stem Auger
ST : Shelby Tube - 2" O.D., unless othervvise noted W5 : Wash Sample
PA : Power Auger FT : Fish Trail
DB : Diamond Bit - NX: BX: AX RB : Rcek Bit
AS : Auger Sample BS . Bulk Sample JS . Jar Sample PM : Pressuremeter test - in situ
VS : Vane Shear
Standard "N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon, except where noted.
WATER LEVEI MEASUREMENTSYMBOLS:
Wl : Water Levei
WCI : Wet Cave In -
DCI : Dry Cave In
WS : While Sampling
WO : While Drilling '
BCR : Before Casing Removal
ACR: After Casing Removal
AB : After Boring
Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the
indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground
water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence of ground water elevations must
be sought.
GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY:
Coarse Greined or Granular Soils have more than 5096 of their dry weight retained on a ft 200 sieve; they are described as:
boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a#200 sieve; they
are described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and sitts if they are noncohesive. In addition to gradation,
granular soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place dsnsity and fine grained soils on the basis of their strength or
_ consistency, and their plasticity.
Major Descriptive Termis)
Component (Of Components Also Percent of
Of Sample Size Ran9e Present in Sample) Dry Weight
Boulders Over 8 in. (200mm) Trece 1-9
Cobbles 8 in. to 3 in. little 10 - 19
(200mm to 75mm)
Gravel ' 3 in. to #'4 sieve Some Zp _ 34
(75mm to 2mm)
Sand #4 to #200 sieve And . 35 - 50
(2mm to.074mm)
Silt Passing #'200 sieve '
(0.074mm to 0.005mm)
Clay Smaller than 0.005mm
CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS: RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOI_LS•
Unconfined Comp.
Strength, Qu, tsf Consistency N- Blows/ft.. Relative Density
' < 0.25 Very Soft 0-3
Very Loose
0.25 - 0.49 Soft 4-9 Loose
0.50 - 0.99 Medium (Firm) 10 - 29 Medium Dense
1.00 - 1.99 Stiff +U - 4o Dense
2.00 - 3.99 Very Stiff 50 - 80 Very Dense
4.00 - 8.00 Hard 80+ Extremely Dense
>8.00 Very Hard ?^_nn? rnuCtft,?'31Ai?1'S _
I
LOG OF BORING 1 '
PFiOJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7
Hillto Estates sITE 6lueberry Lane
Ea an, Minnesota
OWNER
Sienni or orations ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
James R. Hill Inc.
I'-
LL
U. UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT?
- O
1 2 3 4 5
w
,w
L
2 m
j
Z wa
? Y ?
>
w
J
cr Z
=
U
a DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
F,
w
J UJ
Q ? ?
0
m
w
Z)
WATER
CONTENT°k
-? -
TANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
W
° ~
Q z
?' Q
a
3 Q
¢
N
SURFACE ELEVATION
: 890.2 feet
a w
?' °C Q
?
Z S
10 20 30 ao so
Dar rown si ty ine to me ium
1SS 2 ?
sand, and clayey sand, trace roots,
2
5' trace seams black fine
ravel I
. g
;
sandy silt - very loose - wet -
2SS ,
4 Z ?
wn clayey silt, trace fine sand -
O 8 ?
3SS
61
- w -M
t •
,
Red-brown clayey fine to coarse sand ?
5'
7 ra e ravel - 7oose - wet - SC ?
4SS . 6
Gray very fine sandy silt, trace ?
5SS 14 ?
? Red-brown clayey fine to medium sand
to sand cla - loose - wet - SC-CL •
6SS 28 ?
Gray-brown and red-brown stratified
clayey fine to medium sand and silty
seams sand
rav
tr
l
d
' y
ace g
e
;
san
,
14 to medium dense - wet-
l
- lo
s
ay
e
c
o
SC-SM• seams Cl
7SS 161 grown and
ellow-brown silty fine 23
y
to medium sand to sandy silt, trace
d
i
l 34 ? -
8SS ense - mo
st -
clay, grave
-
?
(SM-ML)
9SS Dark gray fine to coarse sandy clay 43 ?
trace
ravel -
and sand
silt
y
,
g
ver stiff to hard - wet - CL-ML
End of Boring at 20 feet
d f
th
lid St
A
ll d
S
em
uger use
ep
u
o
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
?
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED - -
w
L 4 2 feet Whi 1 e Dri 11 i n INC.
GME CONSULTANTS BORING COMPLETED - -
.
W
L
I et After Dri 11 i n
= f ,
2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 DRILLER
.
.
W L e MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN W P APPROVED WCK
.
JOB# I073
SHEET 1 0'F Z
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
LOG OF BORING 2 '
PROJECT Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 7 sITE glueberry Lane
OWNER
Sienna Cor orations ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
James R. Hill, Inc.
H
W
LL
...
F-:
LL UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TONS/FT?
-Q- .
1 2 3 4 5
.
W m
j
Z a _j
>
w Z
i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
I-
W
Q J 3
O
m
J WATER
CONTENT %
BLOWS/FOOT)
TI
N
?
a
° a?-
??
? Q W
~
3 h-
?
? SURFACE ELEVATION
: 890.7 feet a W
?¢ ?
z (
STANDARD PENETRA
O
10 20 30 ao so
Yellow-brown silty fine to coarse
1SS sand
trace gravel - loose - moist- 5 (D
,
SM - fill
2SS Black and dark brown stratified 11
, silty fine to coarse sand and sandy
silt
trace cla
ravel
wood
3SS y, g
,
,
, 4 (D
roots, slightly organic - soft to
' fill
iff
bl
SM
b ?
7 st
- (
-ML-OL) - pro
a
e
9
4SS Yellow - brown fine to coarse sand
, ?
trace silt, gravel, clay - loose
5SS
to medium dense - moist to wet - 6 ?
(SP - SM)
6SS 12, 13 Q
fi
di
d
il
um san
y s
Brown
ne to me
t,
trace gravel very stiff - moist -
7SS 15' ML
' d-brow
R
silt
fi
r
t
16 e
n
y
ne
o coa
se
sand, trace graveY - medium dense -
?
8SS m is - SW-SP 16 ?
Red-brown fine to coarse sand
, ?
trace silt, gravel - medium dense-
9SS moist - (SW-SP) 24 ?
End of Boring at 20 feet
Hollow Stem Auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED ?1 -
W
L Y See a e at 9 feet INC.
GME CONSULTANTS BORING COMPLETED E)-13-86
.
.
W
L Whi 1 e Dri 11 i n ,
2083 EAST CENTER CIRCLE RIG B-24 DRILLER RDK
.
.
w
L Dr After Dri 11 i n MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 DRAWN WDP
I APPROVED WCK
. JOBtt 1073 SHEET2 Of 2
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
mxrcn
r .-+ o ?-+
c r--i m
m r N C
m U. S. Stanaare Siev. ownimss in Inches U. S. Standud Siwe Numbots Hraromour
3 1{ 1 1 1 i 3 4 6 8 10 16 16 20 30 40 506070 100 140 200 270
0
mo too
I'-
? ? z
n
_`
rn ; •
to
nI.- r
c 90
r-?cn-<
n v cn
z -i szo ?-+
rn
m
N 20
c
j? ?-? 90
rn
30
? 70
O ?
C7 m
? t
O0
40 3
v 60
3 0
r ?
50 ?
? 50
c
i `a
.
I U
c «
60
? 40 ?
a
a
70
?
r*?. 30
I
.
;?.
so
20 1
t 90
10
?
3
?
--
+1
1
1
1
1
1
2 E I
4 ±t
100
:
0-
300 50 10 5 1 0.5 u.! 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001
;rain Size in Millimeters
z cM RA AN SILT or CLAY
mCUD? Cwrs• Fin• Co.n• Medlu• iin•
?
?
? vmn
0> C:)
v2
;
?
z
Z m
n
rn N ? Z
,.? pc? --1
V7
pp D D
rn m
?
?
A .
J
?
C)
V
W
KEY BORIfJG SAMPLE DEPTH LL PL PI NATe W.C- Cl1?SSIFICATION
3 4 - (o' - - - I lo . Ce % - row cl e ?'i r-if- i
d
--- 4,5$6 7.5- 12,1 - - - 14.8% row "L •
£LOI 98-8I-9 NOM HW*A dlUS3NNIW `Nd9d3
triS4 dlOS3NNIW 'snodv3NNiw 3Ndl A2Ri383f118
310diO a31N30 lsv3 eeoa S31tf1S3 dOlllIH
INI'S1NdlIHN03 M L NoOlB `9i '8 5T `tii SlOI
SISAltlNt/ 3A3IS
Cy
O
N
O
W
O P erce
t
O nt Fine
Ir
O r by We
0
O ight
V
O
?
U
1p
O
--
O
8
W?
N
N
N
C?
Y O G
o
_
/ ~
D Z
? o
U
+
?
:
a
M
+
m
/ ?
-`
.?
?
w °
d
i o0
0
N
Z
p ? e
t
? U M
-
3 I J
o
0
? N
G
' ?
Q
g
O ti
O
ll ?
N
?r'1
o
I
?
o p
1
?
g
w
0
g
?
..
S
g
?
o
P
$
eru
t C
o
oars
r b
'o
y W
igh
0
t
0
0
0
I
I ?
?
r? N
..
-{1
1?
C?1
?
?
?
r
m
m
2
r?
N - ?
?
W
? ?
U
?
U
?
?
?
?
? p N
1 ?
?•
?
?
n
«..
O
a
?
?
Q
?
? UNIFIED 801L CLA881FICATION 8Y93TEM
(ASTM: D 2487)
I Msjor divisions svTGroup bwols TYPieW nw+a Laborstory dasifieation critKis
1
?
CW Wellgsded Orswk, p?avelsand
? ?so ' 10301 ?
than 4; C- bstwsen i and 3
?? ° 01 o?fo
??
o a
-r mixtures, little or no fnes Dio
0 p C w ?9
?
?!
O +
w M ?
C
O 0 .
Poorly qradwi prsvels. OrsveI- 4 L?
$ =
Not msetiny all yradation nquirtrrwnts fdr GW
.
sand mixtures. little or no fines • ?
Z
c
d ? N y
?
"
"
? c
r? t
?9 CM Silty 9ravels, qrsvelssndsih M 3?
N y? A
Atterberg fimitsMlow
4
h ?
b E mixtutes an
line or P.I. less t Abovs "A" lins witb P.1. -
.-
O o? u
?
Q E 6etwssn 4 and 7 sre bor
use
i
i
R ?0. O N O?. .
C1sYeY 9?avels, yrsvsl-send-clay Z ?? Atterberg limits abow ••A•• np
?
drrline eases re4u
of dual symbols
2
L
? Q GC
?MU?
?
line with P.I. pneter than 7
c ?
...
E
W ?
?
?
Well-ynded unds, pravNly P
o? .. . 2
C?60 (D30
?
greater then 8: C? n 1 ancf 3
?
?` ? ?• w+?, littk or no 6nes ?? .. . p 10 ??o?so
o tt € .. .._
., ? . . .
E-
?,? V? ? Poorly qnded sondc, prsvsllY e'? .. •.. Not msstirq sll yrsdation rsquinmsn?? lor SW
q a ? ands. little or no fina 9t o? . .
0 • C
C ??
O
d 0-
E '
g
"
"
SM Sihy ssnds. ssndsik mixtura " :
? c
a$$ 't' ;;
` A
Atterbery limits balow
line or P.I. les thsn 4 I.imits pbttinp in hetched
u 'o ? k
??•
o
? e q mne with P.I. between 4
T M! 60/?f/IIM C89B5
?
.
?e M?.-?.
Y o
qeyW ssnds, pnd-day mix- p?
C ?«
E •c ? ? e o
4??«
= J7
Atterbe?p limits above "A roquiring use of dual sym-
bols.
&I? SC pures ?$
- 0 line with P.I. greater than 7
Q OG $
Inorgenic silts and very fine
sands, rodc flour, silty or dey-
? ML ey fine ssnds or dayey silts
60
m with dight plsstitity .
? M
4
Inorganic dsys of low to me-
CL dium plasticity, provetly dsys, sc
?
?+ E ssndy Gays. silty clays, lean
dws
H:2
J Orgenic silts snd orpsoic silty ?
" ?? Clays oi low plastiCity x
? Inorganie silts, miceceous w u
MH diatomxeous fine sandy or ?-
L tilty soils, elastic silts d
? 2
?e «
" d Inwpanic cleys of high plas-
?..?° ... CH ticity, fat clays 1
«
r E
,
N y `
? Orpanic eleys ot medium to
., OH hiyh pfastieity, organic silu
Pt Pset and other hiyhly orpsnic
?: I I
soils
Z p
For dassification of fineyr81ned
soils and fine frsction of oosrse-
rainad soits
.
p
Atterbsrg Limits plottinp in
hatched srea sn borderline daal-
fications roquirinp use of dual
mbols
f
.
y
Equation of Adine:
PI=0.731 LL - 20)
I .
OH s ' MH
??P
)
CL
)
d0L
4 .. La
n . ,.. ,.?
?
p 10 Z(7 JU YV ov w ... -- --
Liquid Limit
Plnticity Chart
I C AI. NO'tib ?!1 ?IARI2NT 2! COMPACT[D FILL 3GIL
Lg"E""L
TAe pi?ew?n! ef ea.peeteA [111 fOr ?upport ot founAatlan*. [loor sIabs, pavawnls. or earth
?erutture? SnoulA De c?rrleE out by ?n eap•rleneed r?c?v?'o?enttn ?nA ?ateil.l. t?t?entYW o; e?e?v?tor ?u?l be DteqreA to ?A?pt I+l? proceEurri, eq? p?
project. to re&ther eondlelon?, •nd the ttructunl repulreT?ot. ol the archiLect anA ea9i.eor.
MetnoA? •nd ??te.ll• n6ed fn 9uTSer p.y mt be applle.ble In deterr ffll u?W in Ary
eRC pit?tlont pmpo?eC
av?tlons w?y wt pe sutt?Dle I. +et txcav?tfons or Aurinq perlode 01 preel
•?ry •Aur! qY tAeYCOUr?etofni pre?ertnor'In d(I(erent ?re??tofnt?e?ite?jin .???.?5; .no 10 ,be 0 Adr?ued in tM project dowln9s a^d sFe<«<utlo- .
. C7tCAVATION/bIICRFILL lCIAM TNE YI1Tt11 TAlLC
It 1• ea""en to Mve to no.v. te .nA teplace nnsultaDle wll. belw qYe wter qble Por •!tt
correctlon. As •generat rule ot prudent comtruetlon tcehni re reco?end tMt
extavatlon/Oac4ti11 Ee?w tAe r?te. toDle not be perwitteA, unl1n the eRe.vatlon l. dewtereE.
Nu?erou? propie?u nn dwefop rAen tAl& pro nAure fs dttupted rlenout Aerat.rlnq.
- ln*Dllity o( M pulpwent openton anA wll teehnid?n•
to oD•erve tMtt .II unsuluDle soll-/nrterl?l? ??ve M?n
. , tweveA !rom tM Wn* of tM eatawtlon. . ln?Dlllry te oDstrva an0 ?easure tna! Orepf btersl erfr- .
?lslnq 1 9 prevlAeA. . .
. • In?DiUtr to pnvent or eorr?et devqhlM et .tegvvtlon
.Ie?wus. .nicn e.n r.wlt !n unwltaDle fell@ enPpW
rlthln tM select EeeAfl1l. - Inablllty ot tAe eontraetor to sApnately and unl(orwlr emp.ct tM Mclt[111. ? hnlbllity o1 dl.tutEanee e( the suluble selU at tM
lase of tne exuweloe.
?
eonttreuetloni ynecte?s• txc?tlontnoin e1?ytMe altee beraerstered vith?iump pltri?nC Prudent
thls t?chnlque vou10 net pe ?pp?lc?Dle fo[ eac?..tion tacenAtny Into per?e?Dle 1nnul.r ?031.
??peol?lly [or AeptA? siqnlllantly belev tna r?ter t.Cle. Der.terfnq qr?nulu :oll? ?houlA
norrlly W Aone d th rell polnl? or velle. Mhen Awatering !s neeAed, re stronqly r*cro?end
that . tAe prxeAUnr Ee dl?cuued ?L prrbid or pre-eomtruetlon ?eetlnqs. The Oer.tering
tecnnlque ehosen py the contnctor sAooid W revieved by the orthfteet •nA enqlneer belon
eonstruceten sbru1 1t shauld not Ee le[t untll exeavation !f unAer rey.
"e seleetion oL preper MeA(111 utezlaL Is.lmporunt rAen rorRinq ln Ae.atered euavstlom.
Cven rlth Aewaterlnq, the ba.e 1s usually vet ?nd tAe contractor must Ee coreful not to A1eturU
tne D??e. re reeow.eod tMt the fir?t )ltte o/ backffll Ee ? e?ean wediuw to ewne qnln
`
•?nd rft? 1 e.0 tA.n S% {MUangtAe 1700.sisrs. Tne use o/ ?ilty s,nd. e1?Y?y •?nE. or
eoAnlveh.sl-cohe?fve salli U not rero?ended tor iuch sltuatione. The eac.v?tor qhoulA M
raqulred te suEelt u?nFl?, o[ tht ptopoatd ?ster/sl bl he pt?ns to usa u backflll De!_ ore tNe
Illl 1s MuIeA to th e ut?. .o tA?t IL e?n Ee te.ted lor ?u1t?Di1lty.
MIMTG CMTNM011R COMSTRUCTfON . •lnter qrthwrt preBents 1ts wm ran9e of problao rhlch wet W everewt the dtwtlon "y W
emplleste0 by the neMfor Aev&tKing afseuuad aEOVe.
Ourln7 freeeing eondltions, tM lili usM mwt not be froten when AelfrerM to Me •lte. 7t
•Iso ?uet not De aIlwed to [reeae Aurlnq or aftei cwipactton. llnce the a0illty to wrR th
•oll Mlle Aeeptng It trar [reealnq Aepends Sn part on tha &oll type. the ?peeifieattone ?Muld
reqalre tnr eontnetor to wM?lt I umple o( Au propoied fill Delore tonstrueeion ?taru. Tor
1abontorY taacleq. I[ tAe toll enqlnee? •nd ?tructurH:englmer deterwine tNt !t L not
wluDte. 1t shoulA pe re7ectsd. In 9ener?l. ?llty snd. rl?yeY ?.nd. ?nd eoAexlre/.eni-
eoM?lve •o!U shou1A oot De u.eA u[311 under [rnsing eoMitione. AIi [rosen soll of •ny
t rw .neule w r.jeecea for u.. .+ comv.oe.a uu.
ft !s fyotant tAmt empeeLrA flll De proteeaA /rm tneiing atter ft 1• plaeed• The
t?uv?tor ??ou1A be [equlred te subnlt a p1a n [or protectlnq the soll. The plan \hOVIA ?.CIYO*
detalls en tbe type and a,aunt ot mteri?l IKr??, E1?nRets. extn loo?e [111, topsoll' ete.l
ptopoveA !or uw u lrost protecelon. Lne neeA to protecc t?e ?oll [row free[Snq 1• onqolnq
throughout eonstructlon and sppl1ee both belo1 e ?nd Hter concrete U pliceA, until E?ek[1lling .
Io1 f1na1 [rost protecuon is cowpleted. fouM tion. pleced on Iroten *011 cln •?pe,lence
h e??lnq •nd ?f9^itlca^t ?etC?enent. tot?tton, or othei woveMnt ?. the ?oll ther?. 6uc11 .
kv?went an M. eeeur ![ tAe .oil l? sIIweE Lo Reese after tAe eonerete fs placed anC then .
alloreE to tAor. 7he hlql+et !Ae pereent.ge of ftnea IN mY •nd sSlt, P-200 mtetld 1!n the
flll. ene wre c.iUed U tne need tor proteetlon trm IreesSnq. .. . . . . . . BMl COM1Yl7AMTS. IMC . ..
1qISTV1IE ?MRROL O? riLL
fh* eentreetor Should Ee rpulreA te aA)u?t !Ae ?olstun eenttnt of M* wll to rtthla & mrrov
r?nqe nr?r tAe o?tl?uw wol?ture eontent lu OeftneA 4y tAe applleable ?rxtor er MSNTO Testl.
2n ??ne??l. (111 .nouie ee r?.cee rleAln about 7, of.oDel?uw. Tl?e nNA IorwoUture eentrol 1•
wre cNtic?l •• t?e Percent?qe of flne• lnere?o. Matunlly-ocwrfln, elayey •.nd or
cone.lvehewl-eohlsive ?oll •re otten wu h oeller tMn the optlpuw. PI?elnq "A Kt?nDtlnp to
coTpect •ucA soll• to the gpecllied denstty w.y pe Alffleult, o[ not po?dble. Lven ll uit.ble
p?vewenta ?uD9??4eseC0ueedtoe^D?'V1naf•nEer`appll dtlo dlm YA1s ?! ?&p.cf*lly ?tru?orrhen b vet
cone?fve/se'i-cone.lv. noll I. u. ed Ss nac4f111 !n utlllty erenches uMer atreeu. ha??slvely
ret •ofl in t?ftk Hll •eclton? ??y c?a?e pmt-construeHon 8 ettle?ent MyoM tMt otlteA tor
f111 pLceO ?t or neec t!2U tAe opumuw roisture content.
An ueeptfen to tAU roulA EtIw peneablifty g011 plaeeA na peM llner or tor, Au. tuch
Soll •hould ulu.lly be p1.eeA .t 1\ to 41 *hove the optl.u. ?ol.ture eontent, to provlde for •
Iwer Lneltu perwe?b/llty. AIro. •hrlnRin9/ovelltn9 ?oil• leapmnstve elayl shoulA Ee p1areE *t
•bout N to 41 ?bov. optlwun wl.ture Co reduee tAe po.d bility o( ?o/l eap?n?ion. CI?Yey ?Ut.
•llt, or rery mIlty tine und rnoulE not Oe pl.ced.eueasiwly Ary. fuch ?otl. un undergo
post-tonatruetlon eonwlidetion upon Eelnq retuE, wen !/ the ?qclfi?A den?lty h?d Eern
•cnieveE. TAis 1s uuled by tM coll?pro of •[Ixcul.nt wfl pertlNe ?rnnye?ent. •nd eon
Tnult ln settle?ent of Do11Aln9+ or .1?D? eon?trueteA ever tht soil.
tropet eontrol ot flil wll ?lvture ls eM responslElllt7? et tM esnwter. TM eiesnter
n the Aat? l? th• ¦ofl
q lh. 'oll?. MleA *tthe1.0
,houlA tval-te.the n.ed [or uettln9 or Arylnw?
report. or hL wm ?Ite totln9• 1f tA? r?etor U Erle9lnq !n olM1lt. llll. !t L.I.o hl•
respona1b111tY to ev?lus tethe ?olsture eontent ot tM .oll. &n0 tM n??d ler wttln9 or Aryln?.
W recownend tA?t l?l? ueter w.aereuea /n tM pro)ece ?peclflcaUOn..
coNRT11tICTlOM OM Cq1iAC7CD $OIL
Arc.r en. .eiecc uu eu wen pi.e.a. co."ecea. •na a.ew, u ".c w rine.iew -e
n
proteeted in orAer co properly ?upwrt ?tructure?. the ?uft?bllity o! eo?pseNA f1U O0l1 e,
p. I re. tly 0/w1n1?De0 U!t I. Illo+ed to [rceet, beeome ??tur?teA rh11. uneonfln?A bueB ?? fn
[wtlnq exea•a61ons or ac the surlaee ot sIab/plocewnt subqradel, or Alstur0eA.0y emstructlon
.quipwent. Tne r*spenalblllty fer proteettng tne ?eil, or for earreetinq .nr eJrturwnee. sheulA be ele?rly
Ae[lned ln the spoctlleatlons. Boi1. rAich Eeewie wt ?nE wft ?Hv eaMetlon toW.9 do not
nece?uNly reflect ln?ecunte [leld Aenllty tesu. ly r1t? non-e.p?n. ire
eoAe?lve/?esl-rones/ve sofls. utuutfon rMn unconflne0 un .L?-vp?eerdlydreAuce the thelt Itr .. Ih
vti lte t?e Oentlty rew?n- eeeyu?ie. rne rceuced ?he?r strenqtA tse Nuse toottnq.. T1oor .faD?,
pr p?vewrnu to 0etU e or lall under loaA. rr ?tronqly reeowmnd chat ?Il p+reoent..uDgnEea be
tot tolled IMM/DOT tpecllidt(on 21111 lreElately Oe[ote pewing to Oetnglne 1t tAe suDgraAe
hn not Wen protecteA anA soft spots A- Eeveloped.
Ltooe aus eveciuoe 11ND UTILITY TIIEMCML6
Thls f?ttt et eonstruetlon pre* ents spefal Prebts?. e?ped?tly f[ the aLb wEqnAe L.ilwed to [reeze. Imen the ?oll tMv., it un0erqx? ? perloA a! CawponHlr larec ?hnr •tren9eh.
?Ioor •IaDs•hould not be eut over wil In ?uch a wmkened er ltosen eoMltien Ireterence
. The
pertlnent PtA a nA AC( publloatlons l. 7o do w can result J. enekeA anA hillnq •la be
tl.e pertod to nest and tAar • Dulldlnq w?y pl?ce CAe constructlon scheAule . nd/oa cost. !n
?eopardy. re •tronglY recwn?nd tA?t tAl. ?stter be rorle?reA !n pra-Eld anE pr.-eon. eruetlon
?eetinq?. . Mcklilllnq et utlllty tnncAet !n tM floo[ s1a4 su0qude ean W Alt(leult. 1t tAe sel1 ls
vet. crowWCtion to the speclfied Aenslty ?uy Df dl!!lCUlt, of not poBsible. The na[roriy Cut
trenclee w.y preclude the use of proper eowp?c6fon eQUtpwe^t• Mlth the u?e e[ *?all equlp?ent
!n eon[1neE area ?, the contr.efor wust OLce tAa wil !n tAln !ltt. 11 to 6 IncAe.l? vfCh the
&oll •t tht proper wotKUre content. thU rotY Ss tyD, nlly urrfeA out by oontraeton other
than the mns q-d(nq or earthrorR tontractor. Me ?troryly recooend that tAe responsiDUlty to
carry out the eowpactSon be eleorly deu11e0 in the rppltuEl. .ectlon ot the •pecftlcsttons.
•na tavl.vee vien ene .pproptf.te eoner,ecor .ne .ubeoner•emr..
.Yl teMflllTAriS. IAC
?otu oF
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
June 12, 1986
PARCEL FILE
4158 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE
?, ) l(' ?3 -/
MR AND MRS STEVE REED
4150 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE
EAGAN, MN 55123
Re: Storm Water Drainage
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reed:
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mayor
iHOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VIC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
1HOMAS HEDGES
City Adminisirator
EUGENE VqN OVERBEKE
City Cierk
Hopefully our meeting that was held Thursday, June 5 was beneficial
and the storm water problem will be resolved in the near future so
all three (3) property owners can complete their landscaping.
It is unfortunate that the builder of Lot 16 did not use the
elevation as recommended by Sienna Corporation at the tzme the
home was constructed. The elevations for Lots 14 and 15 were
determined by the building that occurred on Lot 16. With three
(3) builders involved with Lots 14, 15 and 16 it can be a problem,
given the circumstances, to resolve the drainage issue that has
been created. Hopefully the wet well that was proposed as an
alternative by the engineering firm of Jim Hill and Associates,
representing Sienna Corporation, will provide proper resolution to
the water ponding that has occurred since the three lots were
developed.
As I discussed at our meeting last Thursday, the City does not
typically involve itself with matters that are considered private
property and normally can only be resolved between a property
owner and his or her builder. However, because this drainage
issue directly affects three (3) properties and could indirectly
impact two (2) adjacent properties, Lots 12 and 13, it seemed
appropriate that the City attempt to facilitate some solution to
the drainage problem.
Please feel free to contact this office or our engineering division
if you have any questions regarding the proposed construction of a
wet well by the builders and three (3) property owners.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc : Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation "°'fmx_ , ",e P,? -.i'
Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works L?'tr1?: ?'?
Jack Moffat ,
Dale Gustaf son
THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNIN
WAIVER OF HEARING N0. 00153
Special Assessment Authorization
I/We hereby request and authorize the Gity of Eagan, MN (Dakota Co.) to
assess the following described property owned by me/us:
Lot 16, Block*LHilltop Estates _?__ . .
, . -
for the benefit received from the following improvements: -
ITEM - QUANTITY RATE • . AINOUNT ? PROJECT
Storm sewer outlet Lump sum $1,000.00 $1,000.00 ,481 _to be spread over 15 years at an annual inte?est ra e0 of O lo.o o against
any remaining.:unpaid balances.
_ The undersigned, for themselves, their heirs, executors,,administrators
successors arid assigns, hereby consent to the levy of these assessments, and
further, hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary, and waive
objections to any technical defects in any proceedings related to these assessments,
and further waive the right to object to or ap eal from these assessments•made,
pursuant to this agreement. . -
Dated: J/? Z 4?
,(/12,t.(.?
---_._.._ • _ ?=,`--_ ?..___
Daniel'T. Osborn
: • Cheryl 0 orn
STATE OF -P?
COUNTY OF? SS ,
on this o?P'`?da o f . '
Y ?`-f?yt.?/•P?, , before me a Notary Public within and
for said County, personall appcared EL ;. AA?15 ??;?ipY? C3Sgofa?1 to me
personally known to be the person ? described in and wlio executed the foregoing
instrument and a -,? ecuted the same as /%.a4z,, free ct and deed.
•''""?LAUREL A. SCH
• ??i? NOTARY PUBLIC hAINNESOTA ? . ?
DAkOT9 GOUNTY
?Th1S DOCUmerlt D MY Commission Expires Feb: 8,1990 ?t 1ib11C
Hauge, 8mith, Eide F, Keller, P.A. APPROVED• '
3908 Sibley Memorial liighway '
Eagan, Minnesota 55122 ?(? .. .
' (612) 454-4224 . tagan Public WorTcs irectoda,
--'
Revised: 8-30-82
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For Office Use P
City of Eaali
.
3830 Pilot Knob
Road MAY Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: 13 -
Phone: (651) 675-5675
Fax: (651) 675-5694 o5 ' l S C`a&oc Staff:
2009 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: ; f3 09 Site Address: yl S5 'Fe" C-/'a £
Tenant: Suite
RESIDENT I OWNER Name: J I K~ k)i'c2(Z Phone:
Address / City / Zip: 'y1~V &C4W. o, ciQGC c
Applicant is: Owner Contractor
TYPE OF WORK Description of work: zc loo rte
Construction Cost: ors 0 Multi-Family Building: (Yes / No
CONTRACTOR Name:" c, - .,cs w 2 License 3 7 g
Address: 9030 ) / 5
City: ~L oo M,+ ~ c T b ~ S State: Zip: 521z,
Phone: -2,0o--1G-75' Contact Person: ---7-0,1 11t
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
_ Minnesota Rules 7670 Category 1 Minnesota Rules 7672
Energy Code • Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet • New Energy Code Worksheet
Category Submitted Submitted
submission type) • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted
In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan?
_Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan:
Licensed Plumber: Phone:
Mechanical Contractor: Phone:
Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone:
NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of
the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to
conclude that they are trade secrets.
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of
Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in
accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
x JAi5 ('f%- x
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
Page 1 of 3
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
SUB TYPES
-Foundation Fireplace Porch (3-Season) Storm Damage
Single Family _ Garage _ Porch (4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration (Single Family)
_ Multi Deck Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Exterior Alteration (Multi)
01 of Plex Lower Level Pool _ Miscellaneous
Accessory Building
WORK TYPES
New Interior Improvement Siding Demolish Building*
Addition Move Building Reroof Demolish Interior
_ Alteration _ Fire Repair Windows Demolish Foundation
Replace Repair Egress Window Water Damage
*Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION
Valuation D6Q Occupancy ..~C MCES System
Plan Review Code Edition 2ea7 SAC Units
(25%_ 100%_) Zoning City Water
Census Code Stories Booster Pump
# of Units Square Feet PRV
# of Buildings Length Z Fire Sprinklers
Type of Construction Width _ 7
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building) Sheetrock
Footings (Deck) Final / C.O. Required
2 Footings (Addition) Final / No C.O. Required
Foundation HVAC
Drain Tile Other:
Roof: -Ice & Water -Final Pool: -Footings -Air/Gas Tests _Final
Framing Siding: -Stucco Lath -Stone Lath -Brick
Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test -Final Windows
Insulation Retaining Wall
Meter Size:
INA, MIA*.
Reviewed By:
, Building Inspector
RESIDENTIAL FEES
Base Fee
Surcharge
Plan Review
= ~9 30
MCES SAC Z Z X TX I{ q~5_
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Plant
Copies
TOTAL
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2009
Page 2
D.. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2009 Special City Council meeting as
revised.
E. It was recommended to approve the Workers Compensation Services Agreement with Berkley Risk
Administrators Company, LLC.
F. Moved to Recognitions and Presentations
G. Moved to Recognitions and Presentations
H. It was recommended to approve a contract for construction manager services related to the proposed
Fire Safety Campus.
1. It was recommended to approve a one-year extension of the Preliminary Subdivision approval for
Diffley Plaza 2nd Addition, for property located at 4249 Johnny Cake Ridge Road legally described as
Lot 3, Block 1, Diffley Plaza, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes.
J. Removed.
K. It was recommended to approve a Final Plat (Christ Lutheran) to create one lot on approximately 9
acres located at 1930 Diffley Road.
L. It was recommended to direct staff to initiate an Ordinance Amendment to Chapters 5, 10 and 11
specifically as it relates to Temporary Outdoor Events.
M. It was recommended to proclaim May 17 through May 23, 2009, as Public Works Week and authorize 09-7
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
N. It was recommended to approve an extension of the Easement and Assessment Agreement with the
owner of PIN 10-72840-011-01 (Cedarvale Business Center) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all related documents.
0. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications by the City
Engineer for Contract 09-08 (2009 City-wide Trail and Sidewalk Improvements).
P. It was recommended to approve a license to sell tobacco products for Rheata Donatell, Lone Oak
Store, LLC at 1286 Lone Oak Road.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VARIANCE - JAMIE MELAHN - 4158 BLUEBERRY CIRCLE
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a request for a variance of 7 feet to the required
30-foot minimum front yard setback for a front porch addition on property located at 4158 Blueberry
Circle. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report.
Mayor Maguire opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the hearing and
turned discussion back to the Council. Council held a brief discussion.
Councilmember Hansen moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Variance of 7
feet to the required 30-foot minimum front yard setback for a front porch addition on property legally
described as Lot 16, Block 1, Hilltop Estates, located at 4158 Blueberry Circle subject to the following
conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall
become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the Council. Such
extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts
showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance.
2. The porch addition shall not exceed the size shown on the proposed site plan. The roof shall
match the pitch and style of the existing roof on the house.
3. The addition shall comply with all other applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions.
4. A building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
----76.b7 - T37E-'
l ?
Al
L-D
..aAT fl
slip/
t rs t t'~ '4 t;^
LIONS DIVISION v),
l
.o~
as
MM M
6 15
0 10 30
SCALE 1' = My
01% 0,
Fd.1 " ro 0 °A°SP
Pipe pej ~O ° 26
3J~'a • x'
eJiO`6636' v~y \ ` `K~ ~"~NNamnnumrrir9~'i''o
47 ` RANDY D. S t
LUETH 1-4%
\ N B LANDSCAPE
\ ARCHITECT a ~f
Ilk
\ NO. a
Fd.1 /2" I.P.
\ '%,y~~s"~oii 1477,6P\\\N\
CO
Blueberry I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
Circle
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Pant Name: NDY LUE
Sigratu '
Date: Licerue a 14776
Sheet 1 of 2 MefJahn -Kfnard/5fte Phan. dwg Aug. 26, 2008
Public An
Site
Plannning
Plan i
SITE PLAN for Variance to Setback Mesta'
ng
Meilahn - Kinard Residence Recreation Design
RANDY LUETH - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
4158 Blueberry Circle, Eagan, MN 1826 Pheasant Run Drive, Marshfield, WI 54449 Phone: 715.207.0601
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Building
Permit Number:EA113442
Date Issued:09/04/2013
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir
Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates
PID:10-33000-07-160
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Reroof
Work Type:Replace
Description:
Census Code:434 -
Zoning:
Square Feet:0
Occupancy:
Construction Type:
Comments:If there is no ice protection inspection prior to final, the contractor must meet the inspector w/ a ladder and flat bar.
Pictures are not acceptable in lieu of inspections.
Carbon monoxide detectors are required by law in ALL single family homes .
Alex Shikhlinski
Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085
Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195
$105.25 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Jamie S Meilahn
4158 Blueberry Cir
Eagan MN 55123
Delta Construction Inc
11299 Harness Draw
Woodbury MN 55129
(651) 691-5021
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
,r
. y
Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
�-----------------
� For Office Use �
�� �, '4� Cl�� j Permit#: � �� �� I
��� �� ����� � ��� � Permit Fee: � �' I
3830 Pilot Knob Road �ry�������� � I
Eagan MN 55122 U j Date Received: `�J� j
Phone:(651)675-5675 I 1 I
Fax:(651)675-5694 I Staff: 1 I
� I
�-----------------
2014 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION °
����� �� �
Date: ' "�� Site Address: �( � ��-��i7� �� � �+��-� Unit#:
�� Name: �C� ��• t�u C� e, a'�� �e,� u�� Phone: �5� " ������.J
Resident/ R
Owner Address/City/Zip: ��5� V���r� �- ���--��-
Applicant is: Owner V Contractor
Type of Work. ' Description of work: �C'G��., �G�'���.CT���
':` Construction Cost:� -1i�1�'�`�� Multi-Family Building: (Yes /Nd 1�)
Company: T �Ft��L "�7 � ��---L-- Contact: ���� �\����
Contractor Address: ��d�� �� �`�� � : City: I�G�t-'"�Y� �� -�"�W
State: �� Zip:,��� Phone: �,J�'���J�"�`'��maiL• 1� e$. c:(\c� 1����-.. �(gr'1
License#: Lead Certificate#:
If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for a ditional information)
�� c�.,r�"� i tiC` `t G(1 ��v. � ; � ��-i`T `=, `� ��� �..�
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
In the last 12 months,has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan?
_Yes _No If yes,date and address of master plan:
Licensed Plumber: Phone:
Mechanical Contractor: Phone: -
Sewer&Water Contractor: Phone:
NQTE:Plans and supporting documents that you submit are corisidered to be public information. Portions of
the information may be classifietl as non-p�rblic if you provide speci�c reasons that would permit the Cify toi
conclude that the 'are tratle secrets.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours
before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.aoaherstateonecail.orq
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of
Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in
accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180
days of permit issuance.
X N;�;� �I�� � �.. X �
ApplicanYs Printed Name Applicant's Signature
Page 1 of 3
�
�/5� �jlc,�.���v `��C�h,c.,� �. � ,�.
� �������
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
SUB TYPES
Foundation _ Fireplace _ Porch(3-Season) _ Exterior Alteration(Single Family)
� Single Family _ Garage _ Porch(4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration(Multi)
_ Multi � Deck _ Porch(Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Miscelianeous
_ 01 of_Plex _ Lower Level _ Pool _ Accessory Building
WORK TYPES
� New _ Interior Improvement _ Siding _ Demolish Building*
_ Addition _ Move Building _ Reroof _ Demolish Interior
_ Alteration _ Fire Repair _ Windows _ Demolish Foundation
_ Replace _ Repair _ Egress Window _ Water Damage
_ Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building—give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION �'"
Valuation �� s�� Occupancy 1(�-��.- MCES System
Plan Review Code Edition Zc���w�5t3L SAC Units
(25%_100%�) Zoning ��--,Z City Water
Census Code Stories Booster Pump
#of Units Square Feet PRV
#of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers
Type of Construction .�� Width
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building) Meter Size:
� Footings(Deck) Final/C.O. Required
Footings(Addition) � Final/No C.O. Required
Foundation HVAC Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test
Roof: _Ice&Water _Final Pool:_Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final
� Framing Drain Tile
Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test _Final Siding:_Stucco Lath _Stone Lath _Brick
Insulation Windows
Sheathing Retaining Wall:_Footings_Backfill_Final
Sheetrock Radon Control
Fire Walls Erosion Control
Braced Walls Other:
Reviewed By: �� , Building Inspector
RESIDENTIAL FEES
Base Fee ��� �O� �-- 3 Q�
Surcharge �
Plan Review G�� � � � = ( � �
MCES SAC t_.)
City SAC �/" (� ` ��
/�
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit 8� Surcharge S -�' ��P
Treatment Plant C� �
Copies �Q
TOTAL
Page 2 of 3
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Building
Permit Number:EA141938
Date Issued:04/06/2017
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir
Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates
PID:10-33000-07-160
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Windows/Doors
Work Type:Replace
Description:One Window/Door
Census Code:434 -
Zoning:
Square Feet:0
Occupancy:
Construction Type:
Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow
windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation.
Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State
Valuation: 500.00
Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $500 $40.00 0801.4085
Surcharge - Based on Valuation $500 $0.50 9001.2195
$40.50 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Jamie S Meilahn
4158 Blueberry Cir
Eagan MN 55123
Renewal Andersen
1920 County Road C West
Roseville MN 55113
(651) 264-4777
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Building
Permit Number:EA148958
Date Issued:04/30/2018
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir
Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates
PID:10-33000-07-160
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Windows/Doors
Work Type:Replace
Description:Two or More Windows/Doors
Census Code:434 - Residential Additions, Alterations
Zoning:
Square Feet:0
Occupancy:
Construction Type:
Comments:Improvements to the home require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. If altering window openings or installing Bay or Bow
windows, call for framing inspection. Call for final inspection after installation.
Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State
Valuation: 4,000.00
Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085
Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195
$105.25 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Jamie S Meilahn
4158 Blueberry Cir
Eagan MN 55123
Renewal Andersen
1920 County Road C West
Roseville MN 55113
(651) 264-4777
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing
Permit Number:EA154370
Date Issued:03/18/2019
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir
Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates
PID:10-33000-07-160
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Residential
Work Type:Replace
Description:Water Heater
Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size
Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection.
Allow an 18" minimum radius clearance to the water meter from all appliances (i.e. furnace, water heater, water softener).
Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$59.00 0801.4087
Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195
$60.00 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Jamie S Meilahn
4158 Blueberry Cir
Eagan MN 55123
Tony's Appliance
2090 County Road 42 West
Burnsville MN 55337
(952) 435-2442
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Mechanical
Permit Number:EA172998
Date Issued:10/25/2021
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 4158 Blueberry Cir
Lot:16 Block: 7 Addition: Hilltop Estates
PID:10-33000-07-160
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Residential
Work Type:Replace
Description:Air Conditioner
Comments:Questions regarding electrical permit requirements should be directed to State Electrical Inspector, Pete DeGrood at (507)
210-0754.
Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State
Fee Summary:ME - Permit Fee (Replacements)$59.00 0801.4088
Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195
$60.00 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Jamie S Meilahn
4158 Blueberry Cir
Saint Paul MN 55123--140
(612) 322-5378
North State Mechanical
1444 14th Street W
Hastings MN 55033
(612) 207-0345
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature