The URL can be used to link to this page

07/19/1999 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission A -11 A ADVISORY S COMMISSION EA A v, A n S °TA Monday, July 19, 1999 7:00 PM Eagan Municipal Center City Council Chambers A. 6:30 PM - Pre-Commission Meeting Workshop B. 7:00 PM Regular Meeting 7:00 pm C. Call to der and Pledge of Allegiance 7:02 pm D. Approval of Agenda 7:03 pm E. Approval of Minutes of Re la_ of May 17 ai_ J 1998 7:04 pm R Visitors to Heard 7:05 pin G. Department Happenings Pages 3-4 7:06 pin H. Consent Agenda 7:10 p (1) MVTA Comp. Guide Plan Amendment Pages -14 I. Development Proposals (1) Northwood Business Park Pages 15-25 7:11 pm (2) Raintree Hotel - Sieger Architects Pages 26-37 7:30 pm J. Old Business 7:50 pin K New Business (1) Southern Lakes Development-Parks Issues Pages 39-67 7:55 pm (2) C.I.P. 2000-2004 Pages 6976 8:20 pm L. Parks Development Update 8:35 pm M. Water Resources Update 8:40 pm N. Other Business and Reports (l) Subcommittee Updates 8 (2) Cascade Bay Updates 8:50 p--- (3) Park Site Fund Status 8:55 pin O Ro d Table 9:00 pin R Adjournment 9:05 pm The City of Eagan is ct itted to the policy that all persons have equ vices, activiti , f lploynlent witho 'r ° ' : race, color, creed, religion, national origin, s c, disao, tal stator, r o 1, u, status with regard )-c as: istance. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons w" to = are avails 'ale req t a 'least 96 hours in advance of the event. If'a notice of'less than 96 hours is received the City, wil ' provide the ai ADVISORY I" 1999 E L: NAME Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan 11 is 19 17 14 19 16 20 18 15 20 Joseph Bari x X X X X Terry Davis O* X X X X Nark Fllipi x X X Kevin Gutknecht x O Barbara Johnson V;, C' 3i- X X X X X Robert Kane, Jr. (Alternate) X X O* X O* Bonnie Karson sCret3ry X X O* X O* George Kubik x X X X X .ee arkell cn3lr x x X_ X X [Daryle Petersen X X O* X X X X John Rudolph Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee TAcqulsitionfDevelopment Sub-Committee Joseph Bari Kevin Gutknecht N.Mark Fllipi Terry Davis George Kubik Barbara Johnson Robert Kane, Jr. paryle Petersen John Rudolph Bonnie Karson Lee Markell UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES 1. Commission Review Workshop 2. Spring Maintenance Demonstration 3. Recognition of Sharon Holbeck 4. Review revenue sources In lieu of park dedication 5. Review Docks 6. Naming Holz Lake (check If named) 44.99499 5-3 7. Seasonal easement at top of Trapp Farm tubing hill 8. Review of bleachers ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION 1999 JOSEPH BI 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 1/2002 3033 Timberwood Trail Yes (3 yr. 1999) Eagan, N 55121 TERRY DAIS 1997 651-452-2635 (H) 1/2000 4895 Safari Pass Yes (3 yr. 1997) 651-310-8941 (W) Eagan, 55122-2690 452-2152 (Home fax) terry.davis@StPau1.com N. MARK FILIPI May, 651-687-9866 (H) 1/2001 836 Overlook Place Yes 1997 651-602-1725 (W) Eagan, 55123 (3 yr. 1998) mark. nlipi@m etc, state. mn.us KEVIN GUTKNEC T 1999 651-454-2890 (H) 1/2002 960 Savannah Road Yes (3 yr. 1999) 651-282-4414 (W) Eagan, M 55123 kevin-gutknecht@email.msn.com BARBARA JOHNSON 1997 651-452-2609 (H) 1/2001 4535 Oak Chase Road Yes (3 Yr. 1998) Eagan, M 55123 ROBERT KANE, JR. 1999 651-452-3411 1/2000 1795 Carnelian Lane Yes (alternate 651-714-2035 (W) Eagan, N 55122 BONNIE KARSON 1998 651-688-6400 1/2000 3884 North Ridge Drive No (Replaced 612-838-2910 (W) Steve bkarson@analysts.com Eagan, M 55123 Knutson's term 6097) GEORGE KUBI 1993 651-452-3887 (H) 1/2002 3053 Pine Ridge Drive Yes (3 yr. 1996) 612-713-5315 (W) (3 yr. 1999) George_Kubik@mail.fws.gov Eagan, 55121 LEE MAKELL 1990 651-456-0749 (H) 1/2000 895 Park Knoll Drive Yes (3 yr. 1994) 296-4781 (W) Eagan, 55123 (3 yr. 1997) 297-1 157 (Fax) lee. markell@ dnr.state. mn. us DARYLE PETESE 1996 651-681-0170 (H) 1/2001 4l 26 Lantern Lane (3 yr.1998) 612-514-5155 (W) daryle.lee.petersen@medtronic.com Eagan, N 55123 JOHN RUOLPH 1993 651-454-8761 (H) 1/2001 1644 Norwood Court Yes (3 yr. 1998) 612-707-2402 (Fax) Eagan, MN 55 122 612-707-2526 (voicemail) ztlstss jrudolph@burnsvilie.k 12.mn.c E n E City SL ff E- kvraa@ci.eaqan.mn.us kvraa@ci.eagan.mn.us cmesko@ci.eagan,mn.us poisoneci.eagan mn us jasfah(Cci.eagan.mn.us Phone # 651 -681-4661 (Cherryi's # a fter 4:30 P.M.) a t J_ ' NILINIO PARKS city of eagan TO: ADVISORY COMMISSION FROM: KEN V , PARKS DIRECTOR OF RECREATION DATE: JULY 116,1999 SUBJECT: 1 ADVISORY COMMISSION The July 1 Commission meeting will be preceded by a brief workshop : i 60 with Mike Dougherty from the City Attorney's office to review the issue of tree mitigation. Several Commission embers had the opportunity to hear and ask questions of Mike at an impromptu meeting prior to a C workshop. Since not all members were present, staff thought it would be valuable to have Mr. Dougherty review these issues relative to the tree mitigation policy. Please meet in the upstairs conference room. Although there is no formal tour this month, members may want to visit a park i Inver Grove Heights. Please take note of the item on the agenda pertaining to Southern Lakes. visit to the park prior to the meeting may give members a better perspective of the issue;, in preparation of the discussion that will occur. After the Call to Order and prior to the Approval of the Agenda, staff would like to formally introduce Water Resources Coordinator Eric ceth to the Commission and the viewing audience. Staff would also like to take a few moments to give public recognition to Dorothy Peterson as she retires. This would be good opportunity for the Commission to thank Dorothy for her 2 years of service to the community. VISITORS TO BE HEARD: Thursday evening the Eagan Athletic Association asked to placed o the agenda for the J-1y meeting. Sin the agenda already had been publish they will appear der Visitors to Ie d. The EAA Board discussed the need for additional space for sports and has b inv( ng -he possibility ofa referendum. They will be present to inform the Commission oftheir backgrt nd work and the needs of the Association. There is one it on the Consent Agenda for approval. This it is included the packet and pertains to a change of use for the T property to include small shop development. r DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS: There are two items der development proposals'. the first appeared o the June Commission agenda but was deferred to sub- °tt for review because of the significant tree loss. That meeting was held on J e29. The report and tree mitigation proposal is included in the packet. The second it is a proposal r hotel near Yankee e and the Promenade shopping area. This development also has a significant amount otr loss associated with its development. There are no Old Business items. NEW BUSINESS: There are two items der New Business, the first is the result of a letter from the Chair of the Inver Grove Heights Advisory Park and lion Commission. A rather lengthy memo with attachments is enclosed. Please read carefully for a fiffl understanding of concerns the and issues. The second it is the final review and recommendation of a proposed C for the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund. This item has been the subject of frequent workshop meetings. Staff provide a brief overview o the proposed five-year plan for the benefit o the listening audience. The Commission should take formal action to forward this to the City Council if they are in agreement and all final changes have been made. City Administrator Hedges has indicated to staff that he would like the Commission to present their C to the City Council at workshop session. He has tentatively set this for the Tuesday, August 3, Council workshop, This Council workshop would precede the regular Tuesday Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS: Three items as indicated. It three is the quarterly report for the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. If the Commission would like, staff can respond to questions about the report. always, if you have questions out items contained in the packet, or are unable to attend the meeting, please call. es y submitted Ken Vr ♦ Y DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS July, 1999 1. Summer softball has three weeks left and so f we are not usir- the rain week in August. The awards for leagues include league champion t-s s, plaques, and ` c rL- - -.tes to F ker's. 40 teams are moving on to District/Region/State tournament play through SA or SSSA. 2. Fall softball registration runs from July 1-30 with league play starting August 16`h. Leagues are offered Monday through Thursday evenings at a vi Athletic Fields. 3. Fall informational packets are available for basketball, volleyball, and touch football. Registration will be the first two weeks o August. 4. Golf lessons have been a big hit with juniors and adults this spring and summer. The response has led us to offer other session of lessons ' August with Mendota Hci,lit s Par 3. 5. The Youth Development program at Wescott has been awarded a Local Collaborative Time Study Grant (LCTS) from School District 196 totaling $25,000 to be used for program expansion over the next 18 months. 6. The District 197 LCTS grant at Quarry Park has been renewed for the July 1999- July 2000 fiscal year. This grant award totals $12, 700.00 7. e Art Camp program at Caoni Art Park was a huge success! Our youth participated in visual art projects, danced moved around the sculpture gardens and created music and sounds that filled the park. 8. The summer lunch program at Wescott sponsored by the State of and District 196, is serving 400 - 500lunches each week.. These numbers have almost doubled since it beg last year. 9. The Teen entorship program is also quite a success this year. Teens from lac awk Middle School, Dakota Hills Middle School and Friendly s Middle School are developing jobskills and getting on the job training at the Wescott Center, Quarry Park and at the Caponi Art Park. 10. Attendance at summer programs has been approx. 1800 participants per week. Summer in the Park, Wagonful Q Fun, ag ettes, Instructional T- Ball, Games, Sports 8L More, and Preschool programs are included in the attendance figures. 11. Summer in the Park ieldtrips have been a popular program. Participants have visited Cascade Bay, Skate ` e, Bowling at Ced ale, Chuck E Cheese, and the Regal 16 Movie eater. The Summer Blast will occur on July 22 at Trapp Farm Park. A carnival theme will end the summer in the Park program. 12. Camps begin the week of July 26 and end the week of August 20. Over 800 kids ages 6-12 are signed up for a variety of camps including Kraft, Mystery, Safety, Day Camp, Exploring the Outdoors, Drama and are. 13. Preschool programs continue through the end of August. 250 preschoolers are registered for a variety of weeklong experiences. 1 The department Tennis lesson program has reached its halfway point t lessons. We have seen 165 youth come to the weekly lessons at various listed sites. They have been learning and progressing in their skills. addition, youth age 12-18 are enrolled in the junior tennis league, afternoon youth are in tennis camps and the varsity tennis groups are in the varsity training and tournament program. 15. The senior citizens have a busy next f months with trips and outing in and around Eagan. The staff has made a presentation to a local senior group, which hopefully will heighten awareness of the programs offered. 16. Our Fitness fun program offered for youth 6-14 years old with developmental and physical disabilities beg July 8 and will continue for 6 weeks at Trapp Farm Park ere are 11 registered for this outdoor active fun class. 17. Two new swim programs beg at Cascade ay on July 10. Each is 6 weeks long. They are water exercise and morning lap swimming. You do not need to have a family membership to take the classes stead there is a registration fee for each class. We have 25 total registered for the classes. 18. Ronald McDonald Bob and the Beachcomber have entertained our families in Eagan with our Evening in the Park series for this year. We had estimated 200 in attendance for the first evening and 300 for the second evening. A 19. We have et with a local youth band. e musicians are ` high school and we win explore with them playing in o music " the park, and have a fall battle of the bands teen event. They were very enthused and we hope to have them work t us. 20. Staff from the Parks and Streets departments have completed the excavation a filling of the north tennis courts at Rahn Pk. Because of the pockets o poor soil that were encountered, nearly 5' of material was removed in some areas. Over 1500 yards o material w hauled from the site. Completion of the paving and fence installation is expected within the next 10 days. 21. The Twin Cities Tree Trust crews are continuing the installation of a deck and seating area at Heine Pond Park Response from neighbors has been very positive. Completion is expected within the next 2 - 3 weeks, at which time the crew shift to Woodhaven Park to undertake a similar project. 22. e Harvest est at Holz Farm is scheduled for Sunday, August 1. 23. Three n scoreboards have been installed on the softball fief at Lexington-Diffley. They will be put in service upon completion of the electrical connection. 24. The Dakota County Sentence-To-Service crews will be working in Eagan during the next 2 weeks. Projects will include edging curbs and trails, painting hockey rinks general clean up. 25. The installation of a n play structure at Evergreen Park is nearing completion. Staff will then shift to Walden Heights Park to begin installation of the new playground structure and seating areas. 26. The Toro Company is using several Eagan park sites to test mowers and aerators. The program has been a benefit to both Toro and the City. The equipment operators and observers are not City employees. 27. windstorm on the weekend of July 4~ damaged a number of park and boulevard trees. Crews have completed the limited clean up that was necessary. 28. A representative of the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association ) awards committee will be in attendance at upcoming commission meeting to present one of its "Awards of Excellence" in the facility category to the City for the new Le gton- iffley pavilion. 29. e Water Resources Division has a n coordinator in Eric Macbeth, who replaced c Brasch on June 28. Recognition goes to Water Resources Technician J° Storl d for picking p many of the responsibilities of the coordinator during the interim. Eric comes to the City after almost 10 years with the Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission, a bi-state advisory agency located in Hudson, Wisconsin. While at the commission, he coordinated multi-agency technical studies of recreational boating, water quality, and aquatic habitat on the St. Croix and Mississippi rivers. He also provided technical recommendations on management programs and policies to appointed and elected officials. His academic degrees are in biology and water resources. Eric lives on a hobby farm in rural Baldwin, Wisconsin with his wife and two daughters. 30. Many of the division's historical programs are continuing in full in this summer: 31. Weeds have been harvested from Fish Lake, and lBlackhawk and Holz lakes ` be harvested in upcoming weeks. Staff is conducting regular lake-monitoring activities and collecting data for the divider-curtain study. The alum-dosing project is in its first full year of operation at Fish Lake, and a Ph.D. student from the University of Minnesota is collecting data at the site for his dissertation research. Staff also is continuing work with the Dakota County Sod and Water Conservation District o a program to control purple loosestrife. Insects at feed only on this non-native wetland plant are being raised on enclosed plants and then released at selected sites in the city. Data are being collected to ete e the effectiveness of the insects to populate the areas as biological control agents. Citizens continue to participate ° water quality projects ` clu " g storm stenciling, le monitoring, and wetland health monitoring. 32. Possible other activities of water resources staff this summer include: Alum treatment and plant skimming of selected lakes, investigating a small, boat-mounted system to t lake plants as needed, and updating several of the water resources guides and brochures. In addition, staff will be working with other agencies on a project to restore Nicols fen and will be beginning planning a pumping station at the outlet of Fish Lake. WNW city of eagan TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND f ;l EA N DATE: JULY 15, 1 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLANNED BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) is requesting ap dj _f a Comfreh p si've Guide l Amendment that would establish a A, cents Area Land Use Guide l designation upon .5 acres of existing I-35E right-of-way located south of Yankee Doodle Road and between Pilot Knob Road and I-35E in the northwest'/4 o Section 15. In conjunction with the Guide l Amendment, the applicant has also requested approval of a Preliminary Planned Development (Rezoning to , Planned Development) to allow the establishment of a mixed use, retail/transit facility upon the subject property. The applicant has indicated that the existing "Park and de" lot is consistently parked at full capacity. More specifically, ridership has increased at a rate of six to eight percent each year the Park and a has been ° service. response tot this increasing demand, the TA has determined that the existing capacity of the '?ark and de" should be increased substantially. In conjunction, with the proposed parking expansion, the A has also proposed to offer retail services to riders. The subject property is unplatted and overlays I-35E right-of-way, The existing "Park and de" provides a total of 293 surface parking spaces. The applicant is proposing single-phase, mixed-use development upon the subject site. The following is summary of proposed site improvements. • Increase transit surface parking from 293 stalls at '6" to 841 stalls at (surface and two level parking ramp). Provide 68 retail parking spaces at 10'0" ■ Two individual buildings • 15,000 retail building • 1,000 square foot transit building • Consolidate bus movements into a "bus only" loading area. ■ Revise the landscaping and setback eas. PARKS/TRAH,S DEDICATION: This development would be responsible for a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication for the square footage of the retail space only. TREE PRESERVATION: There are no tree preservation issues for the Commission to address with this development WATER U This development is located in Drainage sins B and D in the o Center o Eagan. This 5.7 acre development will generate runoff that will be discharged to Ponds -5 and -26, both of which are designated as nutrient traps in the City's water quality management plan. Pond - in turn discharges to lac k Lake and and -2 discharges through series of sta water ponds to LeMay Lake. Both o these lakes are classified as Class I Direct Contact Recreational ateroies in the City's water quality management plan. There are two recreational classified water bodies downstream of the proposed development. Because this development is relatively small currently 63% impervious with steep slopes, the site does not lend itself well for the construction of a sto water treatment pond on-site. Staff recommends that no on-site ponds be constructed to treat runoff from the impervious areas of the development parcel. However, a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is recommended, contingent on the construction of a building o the site. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development area. FOR COMMISSION C : 1. This development shall be responsible for cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication for the square footage of retail space only. 2. This development shall be responsible for a cash dedication in lieu of on-site oning, contingent on the construction of a building on the site. F TRANSIT T TI0 tx «'Mr»yre ..»rt•®w ,o .arw iw >«rr« x• »wau rq ay (C.S.A.N. NO. 28) wt « wm • A... « - • «aT r miuBr 9f I «!sw tx t) YANKEE DOODLE ROAD °w° w a " - w« w «w w wti u Mw,r ti N 4q nr UA-Wv - • ,syw9Y 4+*® • « 1W «R 51!.14 a m n w Mw 11" w - . 110,00 N89t®IIIE • d rH,xx • M » Sx -a a a.~s ~xz+U~q « w i! ,x A y ® wT•,rr n - w ra « • se x,e M w W% use bald -W *A x r - «•w - w w- N M Tww *.ft me O ® p :ya : WAMMA VNA9W r AWROWIT goo LOT 9 O ~ fir tr a S GJ n.a Or W n? ft COLON OF ! -c V ~i QT d - 41 VILA' a rY :i BLOCK I ®3 \ ® 8 AI to ft Eagan x' , ag mar \ p i E) ..+*,+t .r M,.x w• err sw « r rw wn rtrxn s ra.sll~se, w Mi xW 1 J _f + -r # • wm.sa4 1•t4• M M rru•F wH r Uxa.•w av mm,a•ix M•r - w• M.7 #t:.w~s v~,aro mr t #M. M • •,•••a~Sa Pv-.. rnrq. x,••M M• b- -ft w• er•• «e~., abred sere em+. &Pa u.v x Yr « w« ww• •.e t,~•:.,. , . Transit Station p44~ '}r«` *9 Amomm um -um-W VAR ~V~ d L qty VIA • c"T TA Jw- MIN IL Eagan , snows 1/2 NXN ara, oft Mr, ti w w « t ®b wmu Or WL "a C~ i e aw"W2 for r ra p rr W a t ag FOR f t at' ° `w C M Two. i, aa. 23 CDkS !t ! {JT W -sit 4 e~~ r L••xn ~ t s.~~,•,r. e•x... n,•.,r xr, o••,.w +41 r.- J. I" oft 00 WU "W e x t ~ #wm a~aoa~ M « a r vt• 1t.. •.t• .r w« w.• » w «w4u m r y k-k a $ - 7 wwom srx wT y C-Ap M FINAL - T a WAU fat b.." re a m4.0 # W* 000" r r « sw M -OW b 6.6 0 le Land Survey~ n , LLC. TM x' w r "'K YANKEE DOODLE ROAD -o . YANKEE DOODLE ROAD I G m a.xM rw rr t,tarRVtld:O 1 I I l i 2- tip lI. K7.C MIIfFO /L000 L, 1[rM 4d~.. AwV.a AwYrr MOC► rai : 9, 1trf wArr AIM ~r c"ZolllR 9j ur.."p^ lies ~4! nLmsm T q1 16133®9W AT YJ PLANNED " 1 DEVELOPMEW .A - SUBMITTAL Q 2 MINIMUM SETBACK d O TM AND SITE REQUIREMENTS 0 IY « x BUILDING SETBACK m Eagan O 30' - ALONG PUBLIC STREETS O Y 50' - ALONG INTERSTATE Y i CX~ Transit p PARKING SETBACK O 20' - ALONG PUBLIC STREET J a Station ` BUILDING HEIGHT 31: 35' MAXIMUM Eagan, N x i.M • BUILDING SITE COVERAGE PARKING SUMMARY PtAU 33OX OF SITE MAXIMUM 274 TRANSIT ACES 8'-6" W PsAwn mw (14 ACCESSIBLE STALLS) SIGNAGE SETBACK Sim ONLY On" .TM TWO LEVEL RAMP= 548 TRANSIT SPACES P Y a"MR ` axc NOT FOR now + CONSTRUCTION PARKING SUMMARY 68 RETAIL SPACES IW-O' (k5/1000 GSF) R (3 ACCESSIBLE STALLS) ° I r r r tAW 293 TRANSIT SPACES 8'-6" Rm/ft"uml Lon urr cwM Dome-cwt. (8 ACCESSIBLE STALLS) OAX9 LAW t a a 548 TWO LEVEL RAMP WA-air Sat. r-la I' rv_m am or, m .xew S%N (14 ACCESSIBLE STALLS) aaa r. TOTAL TRANSIT SPACES- 841 TOTAL RETAIL FACES- 68 SITE PLAN PLAN RAMP PLAN . N Mot/ rr% tF14r3T.4X3 e4Arr.. gem SIMCAM rl YN^ Aft ® NORTH ELEVATION ki! 0, » - - a .1M rAU».,d r PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION A PL ?atk 1 16 i -0 d- _ -1 • , TAL Eagan Transit r P EAST ELEVATION Station Eagan, MN P M Y 4OT FOR IAL ST ELEVATION w - ~ e _ !N { 1 [ ~ SWa t r F _ MARY i ^6...# = 8 4AWN. AM/16 , a r 91BRU on= PTI. sa;,a"- Pew 3N I~ r I GN 1 ' T rA ♦ r FAMPIC LOT N wr r ' Iw N`- !a w b EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTIONS "Z'""` ' NOT TO SCALE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ii4d S AL Eagan I Transit Station wTK + 1 1 I I kLOt t-r cum to CLOW ®O-d PAOMMNG LOT T 2TA ♦ Y Eagan, MN _ 6'\ SECTION PROPOSED I PROYEENTS p t v NOT TO SCALE NOT FOR N U ON r w e I CIO r t4 try s a.ss tw..,sr. Idt •r ~ ~ mi TWs rcw¢ qrK 115 NET". ♦ c ,-Tn. SITE SE OS I ♦tow Kom ROAD cu" TO oift °-O' P LOT RETAIL ♦ ~ w4 B PDi SECTION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS NT)T TO SCAT F Trn •ur++uyArw+ra I.+• I Go a. of Sulu_ 1 I M Eagan EL=1?8'°0' Transit _ i LEVEI_l Station EI =115'-0' 1 2 TO 1 SLOPE t Eagw% MN SEED AND EROSION j CONTROL BLANKET GROUEL=N D , l VARIES I VE 0100'-0'7 1 j PRE Y NOT F CONSTRUC 110N PARKING RAMP INTERSTATE 35 M. cb~ r«k ».ta or. M r SITE SEMONS RAAAP SECTION AT INTERSTATE 35 plyj i NOT TO SCALE .J . I m" sl st "j' KEE DO CE AD ? I Go J aJ•~; 21i W j i , L tr 4i1}Mtllf I-Vk- r i i ~ ♦ i pSli/./tii l~rM r 0 ! , 1 P REVELUPMPNC ® 1 j SUHMXTTAL ' i+ I t 1 r r JJ ♦ / r s f J ® I ; i j J Eagan Transit 9 1 / P Station 1 i %Q Q. 4 - i Eagan, MN t 1 ~ 3~ ~ 1 ILET PROTECTION r h', f PDA PRELPAINARY NOTFOR CONS MUC710N SEE CITY OF EAGAN STANDARD PLATE NO. ® , ® 801 FOR SILT FENCE DETAIL. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SILT FENCE ALONG ENTIRE PERIMETER OF SITE. i GRADING } 9 ' ) r AJ G ND EROSION CONTROL PLAN YANKEE DOODLE ROAD j a r a a sw er uwt s ® h ~ax.cbsra t 1 i ti4' s y. a Q~ PLAN DEW'-L R e St Q e 2 O cc Eagan l~1~ 0 ZO m Y Transit Station a &&"-4 11 _ _ P Y 1 NOT FOR f { NSTRU ON Pa t ~ J ~ t /may ~ a.r r-sar f 1 .r aa~a ,V. a "WMA, a l a twrm TRAP 1 s PL TRANSPLANTING PLAN I" - L, N ' i I YANKEE DOODLE ROAD Him iI I I I hill tom. ~rrrrn~"r~c~ t,.t• BM t ° uv tt uzt» t Ay~ t11SM.8lU i pHs" l~ T DEVELOPMEW SUBMITTAL 4 ® PLANTINt4TES Eagan Q nxalf ~a1AR >va s' ttfFa M~ • sp Transit ED v z Station 0 ..o. Eagwi, N ' P L ARY NOT FOR CON UCTION r PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING DETAILS too nx EMS t • °r' • MIMI, M .Y•y R M r W[ f• • Yf ~)zsi. •t Ui IttNE If, f9f9 ® • ~t r 9W' • tW ~.aN wi tl M' / SEE SHEET L2.0 FOR AREAS TO 5 D/SEEDED KMO SEE SHEET C5.1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS PLANTING PLAN =z^dwst~sr tog I ' ANTING PLAN a • x ro• • N TO: Y PARKS l . SI N FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY >1 ,1< SUBJECT: NORTHWOOD BUSINESS PARK BACKGROUND: Lexington Eagan Limited partnership is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Northwood Business Park) to create one lot and one outlot on 23.94 acres located north of Northwood Parkway, west of Lexington Avenue and east of Home Depot, in the S 1/4 of Section 10. The property is vacant and contains numerous wooded areas, significant trees and scattered wetlands. Access to the site is proposed via a public street extending north from Northwood Parkway. A future access to Lexington Avenue is also proposed. The preliminary development plans show the first development phase, 43,300 square foot single-story building, on the southwest portion of the site. The proposed use is 80% o ce/20% industrial x and will be consistent with the Business Park zoning district. Future development phases for the outlot consist of three additional buildings. DEDICATION PARKS AND TRAILS This development would be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. TREE PRESERVATION Site iso This 2-acre site is approximately 75% covered with some type of significant vegetation, with the balance of the site being either wetlands or graded areas from the installation of utilities for Home Depot, Si nif cc_kq t atin tree inventory has been submitted for this site. It indicates that there are 256 individual significant trees o site. Individual tree species include bur and r o (6" to 45" diameter), cottonwood (12" to 6" diameter), and scattered ash, elm, maple, willow, boxeler, and pine trees. Oak species comprise about 65% of the individual significant trees within the inventory. Twenty-one o trees are classified as specimen trees, having diameters equal to or greater than 30 inches. The submitted inventory also indicates that there are 31,775 square e of significant woodlands o site. These woodlands are comprised of cottonwood, poplar, elm, and silver maple tree species. Development as proposed will result in the removal of 161 significant trees (63.4% of the total), and in the removal of all 31,775 square feet of the significant woodlands (100%). According to the City of Eagan Tree reservation ordinance allowable removal for this type o development (multiple-lot single-phase commercial) is set at 47.5% (121 trees, 15,093 square feet of significant woodlands), a ~ With a significant tree removal more than allowable limits, there will be tree mitigation applied tot this application. the development is proposed, tree mitigation calculates to the installation of 128 category trees, or 256 category trees, or 512 Category C trees, or an equivalent combination of these trees as mitigation for tree removal in excess o allowable limits. Tree mitigation reforestation is ' addition to city required landscape plan. Reforestation shall occur within the development. Additional Information 1. The applicant has stated that at the present he will concentrate development on the first phase aft this site (southwest comer), 1 review ° regards to tree preservation is being considered at this time for the site in its entirety. Amounts of existing trees, trees to be removed, and tree mitigation has been reported d calculated for the entire site. 2. Tr mitigation reforestation will occur in phases as each phase is completed. "credit system" shall be employed fort this site t the go of maximum preservation and required reforestation mitigation occurring within each phase (the exact size and location of each building phase should determine necessary tree removal, not a conceptual plan). the last phase is completed reforestation mitigation will be recalculated and fulfilled . A memorandum from rodsho Consulting (the applicants Landscape Architect/Site Planner) is attached which describes revisions to the development plan that resulted from the rC Natural Resources Subcommittee meeting. Tree mitigation numbers within this memo are slightly different than those reported above (the revised plan/drawing referred to in the memo had not been received at the time the rC packet was prepared. verbal update will be provided at the July rC meeting if/when the revised plan is received. For Co issio osi eation: 1. To consider the applicants proposal to fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of one-hundred seventy-two (172) Category trees (81 of these trees will be installed during Phase I with the balance of 91 trees added as each lot is developed) and through a cash donation. According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation rice the required tree mitigation calculates to the installation of (128) Category trees or two-hundred fifty-six (256) Category trees or five-hundred twelve (512) Category trees, or equivalent combination o these trees mitigation for tree removal excess of allowable limits, 'tigation shall be in addition to any city required landscaping. . To acknowledge that tree mitigation "credit system" shall beemployed fort this application with maximum preservation and required reforestation mitigation occurring within each phase. When the last phase is proposed reforestation mitigation will be recalculated by city staff and fulfilled by the applicant. . To require that Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) be installed at the rip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is eater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. /6 r 4. To require that the applicant contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. WATER QUALffY/WETIANDS: Water quality and wetlands issues will be presented in separate memo distributed at the Commission meeting. FOR COMMISSION S 1. This development will be responsible fora cash parks dedication, . This development will be responsible for a cash trails deicaiton. . Consider the applicant's proposal to fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of one-hundred seventy-two (172) Category trees (81 of these trees will be stalled during Phase I with the balance of 91 trees added c lot is developed) and through a cash donation. 4. Acknowledge that a tree mitigation "credit system" shall beemployed for this application with maximum preservation and required reforestation mitigation occurring thin phase. When the last phase is proposed, reforestation mitigation will be recalcuiatY 'by city staff and fulfilled by the applicant. . Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the rip Line or at the perimeter of the Critic Root Zone, whichever is eater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 6. The applicant shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree reservation 1 and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. 7. Water quality and wetland issues as recommended by the Advisory Commission. f~. 07/09/1999 13:36 6124565748 6124565748 BRODSHO CONSULTING PAGE 02 BRODSHu CONSULTING Landscape Architecture Site Planning Greg Hove City Forester i of Eagan 501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 July 9, 1999 Re: Revised tree calculations Dear e, Following t Natural Resources sub-committee meeting last week we were le 'to take a closer look at the grading around the pond areas. revised grading plan is being prepared showing I I more trees can be saved by tightening u the grades and by moving the to n outlet pipe to a different location. The group looking at the phasing plan and asked the developer to not grade for Building # (northwesterly comer) at this time. We °d look at the grading required for the overall site and the northwesterly corner o the site balances. Therefore o not need to grade that area immediately. o however, need to grade the parking lot, driveway, and pan o the building for Building #3 (northeasterly comer). The 1 Building I balances. It is the soil a the newly created which is needed for t o portion of Building #3 The sub-committee ask if we coin hold o on the grading or Building #2, and yes we will. The extent o the grading will occur as shown the new grading plan. The sub-committee also asked s to n t will occur as far as plantings for Phase 1. The landscape plan shows detailed 1 for Building I and t adjacent to the cul- de-sac. rest of the site will be landscaped each lot is developed. The reforestation 1 also shows occur what will p of Phase I. The rest o the trees will be installed each lot develops. It is 'o hop that c future building is designed, additional trees will be saved. The following numbers are based the proposed plan and can be adjusted according to the final development plans for each lot. any case, e . ro osed l gives "worst se scenario" as far as tree removal is concerned. Total trees on site: 256 Total trees removed: 161 Total trees saved.- 95 We are required to mitigate 3 trees. These trees equal in replacement to the 172 trees as own o the replacement plan. 698 NoRTHbRjr)GE COURT a EAGAN, MINNESoT,~ 55123 (651)688°8023 Fax: (651) 456-5748 /S 6124565748 0%7/09!1999 13:36 6124565748 $RODSMO CONSULTING PAGE 03 Page addition to the 172 trees shown o the plan, 6 Category trees are, required re for the removal of the significant woodlands. Fives I will provide the landscaping a on the Lh' PC Plan. It -A ~ < e I of the 172 replacement trees. 71 will l add at the tiff each lot i o d. A bond or other of surety can t ie b the i to e urc that those trees will be planted. The remaLning 66 trees which iced mitigation fort the removal of the woodlands do not physically t on the site if all of the landscaping is required. Therefore, we are ro °x to submit t the City a cash donation equal to the value of those trees. That a this site would not* be'over City can use the on to, purchase install where they eve could they be best used. Thank you for all your guidance on this project. This. site has b very to or on and the deeWons out the removal of the trees wetlands is never sy or simple. appreciate all you have done and ° there is any additional information you n ,...-d, please let me know. Respectfully, BRODSHO CONSULTING Debra rodsho &mgan Soundwy Location Map Eta I 9.._ P'A4'c Eulldl F t i y ~ I Lld t f(~/ t r Itp Ll il Avg cz~ E 6 1 ~ f _ _:F~12 ieaGt 1000 { l Iwo o DevelopmentIDeveloper: Business Northwood r Application: Preliminary Subdivision Case U N a:W MW W-TN*M provided offrom g o, in as a I m. +City of Eagan IS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY E 1+ nt e®r ent o City of San and Dakota County do not Euarantoo the accuracy of this Information and ors not responsible for errors or omissions. o r" v~ti a tle r i' 1J ~ IBds 1( , 1k. t c II a ® m - C 6miy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i®m( (a ~a 1i W~ PAM wow W ` i ~~f~5, a.r. way ax M ' •w e. ~.,3,_„~. _~.r J° - MMVW • " MVW PPARTWOW aft MCLAAMMIr KM PLAN SITE PLAN r r Plitt i ! Pj INK \ew.~~. GRADING PLAN i ~ r 1 PIZ f ~ . t t f} ~ _ t i y t ~i . R J t t 1 ~ ~ J' E t' ~ -IR 1}'RtHPFartitiiiKllsixnslUi!Rtnr I ~i ~t r --1 df'` ± PI~II~I~i~~t~lrrrr~{Qut trr ~ ~ ( t ~ ~ -z ~ 1 f,,. .f t a I -....v+as-ak4,a,ase,c,4aa.aAavtv.!1",.,t I 1 _.f t ` y,/ ' x °x .f I 4 d t # it . T - - - - - - - - - I/Ntt/tlritilf3tllttgtltl/sep4ittlttltirltttii °i°xi$itS/tft ttt+iti iitllti/KltiFtrdttt~i}ItttrtllMfttttrr . RRS+asatpttttrtrltltlllt;{ttblus*1++~+++»s+w.+®asc.w.ras+oewe..,..•••---• ca «r....»................... its if tsttt/Ttrl/Iri~~~{t~t~~~ €li~l~ft[tt~t~f s~tttiKtrtll tt~ttttt~{tNfl/ ~~titrK~tK'{{ {1tt{tlrrt[tKttttftrtrttftttsttr flirt"ttisKKKE{'Irf~f~l{~~I~fE{®K[8tirtl.....Ifsttltlti{{ttrttFStl ritf8t8ttrt~j .°a,i`.,°,.<,axra+.R+%eayq.,awuaygaata+uacwauatu~taa®aWCVa, aaatl*. a+sN.p~au, ,®a,sre®a,cy.4n+,:.e+.au ;s,='oaa..eaatwaa'a yry:,slchd„a {a({a,;!caa,,,' ,`+,ea;z~.e:al . TREE INVENTORY/PRESERVATION 110900 MWA m NORTHWOOD BUSINESS PARK PHASE ! AjM_ 01v- Nom. A-* tOC mw \ EAGAN, MN tiw+ m«.« %,s+^»r.. oa FOR n se,~.,.'Ini rrwt~+.e-srtt w „w f.«. o..w»..w+ .„r ao v* .M+ _ ...v LEXINGTON EAGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP w. $ii R r1!wxdm,~s»06 SWM K3 :tea .r er TREE INVENTORY/PRESERVATION PLAN nr+rt«s..a rrux®.-x+r »n , ?i - - _ - «i M'ba LWIR.~f I I 1 ~ ~ a ~ r ' Itl ~ a { 1 I I E 1 1 I / 1 ! / ~ TM"aso 1 L I.Y7.hC.A% rrt r tree w.mv w sw«n-r..rPa T•~(a° W awo..*w«m Cram ^»u-•s«~r x' 4a +uw.. so-.. ,.y« . REFORESTATION PLAN \ ® NORTHWOOD NESS PARK PHASE ! G t .R ' a r9 e o EAGAAC MN FOR LEXINGTON EAGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP U4 \ REFORESTATION PLAN n a sai riuNS<-ao+s ~c - - 7 ~a. x.z •~v., ril .-r., 1L wy uul vJ ~M 7. 31521ANA1111z *Ojai flit fill if "111111111 I all - r IIII1I~~~,,, ti ± a~ I x. I r~ - - -tea - t %--w -A, z t zli -r 333 i - - t I I'a 111, 1 fill "9 - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ _ - - - - - fit fit a lip, t~ f it GENERAL CONCEPT PHASE I LANDSCAPE - , NORTH W NESS PARK PHASE 9 ,,v k +rf } 94 ° ' > u,..., EAGAN. uw o a o . - tom. ' i r su.s •a. ,.w,.ww e _ ~ _ FOR, ItvlWt-8.9) tl6H)ss r-9s.9 'a mrwao •+f : r[C .?y ' LEXINGTON EAGAN t,fTED PARTNERSHIP - - r OVERALL. CONCEPT PLAN city of eagan MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS S FROM: HEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY , SUBJECT: RAINTREE HOTEL - SEEGER ARCHITECTS BACKGROUND: Sieger Architects is proposing amendment to the Eagan Woods Office Park Planned Development to construct a hotel on utlot A, Eagan Woods Office Park consisting of 4.19 acres in the I/4 of Section , southwest of Pilot Knob Road and I-494. Eagan Woods Office was platted in 1985 and the office building o Lot 1 was constructed later that year. The property was zoned as a Planned Development and the Agreement originally called for a hotel or office on utlot Within a year of the initial Agreement, amendment was executed which removed the hotel use from the D and this site remains designated foroffice use under the 1985 Agreement. The proposed aintree Hotel is six-stories and contains 160 guest rooms and suites, a conference center and restaurant, and an indoor recreation water park. The proposed Planned Development includes deviations from standard Code requirements, which include structure height and setbacks. The site is heavily wooded and has large variations in topography. The site is highest along the east side adjacent to Pilot Knob Road where elevations are about 888 and generally slopes to the west with the lowest elevation o 846 in the southwest comer, PARKS/TRAELS DEDICATION: This proposal would be subject to cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. TREE PRESERVATION: Site isto This .2 acre site is located on the west side of Pilot o Road just south of Interstate 494. The site is approximately 75% wooded with hardwood and softwood deciduous trees. There are significant existing elevation changes o this site, ranging elevation of 846 feet to 888 feet. Significant Vegetation tree inventory has been submitted for this site. It indicates that there are 177 individual significant trees on site. Individual tree species including primarily bur and redo (6" to 36" diameter) and ash (6" to 1" diameter). The balance of the wooded area is comprised of scattered e basswood, hace , boxelder, birch, walnut and trees. Oak species comprise 42% of the individual trees. Two o trees are classified as specimen trees, having diameters equal to or greater than 30 inches. Seventeen a trees have diameters from 21" to 29" Development as proposed for this site will result in the removal of 143 significant trees (80.8% o the total). Fifty-nine (71%) of the eighty-three o trees are proposed to be removed. Both specimen o trees will also be removed, According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation ordinance allowable removal fort this type o development (single-lot single- phase multiple-unit residential) is set at 30% (53 trees). With a significant tree removal more than allowable sere will be tree j .i , applied to this application. the development is originally proposed, tree mitigation calculates to the installation of 112 category trees, or 224 category trees, or 448 Category C trees, or equivalent combination of these trees as mitigation for tree removal in excess of allowable limits, Additional Information 1. The free Preservation and `tigation PI shows ten (10) "gees counted as removed but i try to save". These are six o trees and four ash trees located near the perimeter of the building site. They are presently counted as trees to be removed because grading and/or site alteration will occur wit °n their critical root zone. 2. The applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation 1 that shows the installation of 47 Category trees. This is 4% of the required mitigation of 112 Category A trees. memorandum from Robert Sieger of Sieger Architects (the applicants' Landscape Architect/Site Planner) is attached which describes their plans for /filling mitigation requirements. Suggestions provided e t installing the balance of the mitigation on a site to be purchased ` the future by the applicant and/or to install mitigation within the county right-of-way on Pilot Knob Road. For o issionCosi eraion: 1. To consider the applicants proposal to fulfill tree mitigation req.L eu . s throw the installation of forty-seven (47) Category A trees, and throw the installation of the balance of tree mitigation (65 Category trees) on future property owned by the applicant and/or installed within county right-of-way. According to the City o Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance the required tree mitigation 448 calculates to the installation of 112 category trees, or 224 category trees, or Category trees, or equivalent combination of these tees as mitigation for tree removal in excess of allowable limits. 'tigation s1i 3ia be in addition to any city required landscaping. . To require that Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) be installed at the rip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is eater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 3. Torequire that the applicant contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to sure compliance t the approved Tree reservation l and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. T WATER S. This development is located in Drainage Basin H in northwest Eagan. This 4. acre development will generate no that will be discharged to and -7, which is classified as a o water basin ' the City's ter Quality Management Plan, to a culvert under Highway 13 and to the wetland complex on the Minnesota River. There are no recreational classified water bodies downstream of the proposed development. Because this development is relatively small and heavily wooded with steep slopes, the site does not lend itself well for the construction of sto at treatment pond on-site, Staff recommends that no on-site ponds be constructed to treat no from the impervious areas of the development parcel. However, cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is recommended. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development parcel. Staff recommends at a cash dedication in lieu o on-site oing be required for the development. The s dedication required based on the area and impervious characteristics of the development will be about $14,000. FOR SCOMMISSION CONSIDERATION: I. This development would be subject to a s parks dedication. 1 This development would be subject to a cash trails dedication. . Consider the applicant's proposal to fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation o forty-seven (7) Category trees, and through the installation of the balance of tree mitigation (65 Category trees) on future property owned by the applicant and/or installed within county right-of-way. 4. Tree Protective measures (i. e. orange colored silt fence or foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be required to be installed at the rip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. . The applicant shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan placement o the Tr Protection Fencing. 6. s dedication in lieu o on-site oning shall be required for the development. The cash dedication required, based on the e and impervious characteristics of the development, will be out 14,000. a 608,2836101 r r 017/09/1999 15:55 FROM Sieger Architects TO 916516814360 P.02 a AML -SIEGER-/' 1501 Monroe t. Madison, W1 3 11 100 3Z Al U1 July 9, 1999 City of Eagan 1 Coachman Point Eagan, 55122 Attn: Gregg Hove, Forester Re: Extra Mitigated Trees itr l Pilot n Road & Highway 494 Gregg: r currently on two proposals for the _ iti t trees that r not used on h intr Hotel site. 1. r negotiating for h purchase of another site `thin the City of n. This site currently h very few trees. The proposal is t place the trees on t ttti r. The to ;ron of t site will disclosed thin 30 days. 2. We ou ! like t continue negotiating ` the County i an attempt to 'n their approval to place tree i the Pilot nob Road right of y. Please contact if you have n questions or concerns. Respectfully Submitted, • Robert J. i er ~ Y TOTAL P.02 . 7V n Boundary Lmat"Pon Map .a c a~ ino uildf Footprint • among eA1 g I Sub Oct site -T~ vi 00 + wi L g N r+,~ ~ d i '`fit . or IL 7 * 0 ♦ ` y a ' ® ® t i 5f t r, ' • ® t A # w RE RE w a t 'i# g T 0 , IWO 00 Feet DevelopmentlDeveloper. Sieger i / i roe Hotel Application: Preliminary t v 'opment Caste 04-PD-04-06-99 11. N Jo~city of Eagan nd Apt , THIS Np I INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY E cw ny .w we o•wnm.n® The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee 040 accuracy of this Information and are S not responsibio for errors or omissions. K , Y A T INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO 494 t!!!m }/g -pp li T"1 ° w+ w, r t ra,, » w»ws w w w.. « fit . 'c , ~ S 'y 1 t t t , t i . ~ i \ ~".~.1 A A + m : «.w « . « ~ ~ ~.ea ',,,,+w / / t ~ t , , ~tt~~;~1 \t i , , ~ s ■ r ~c.,~s,~ i'j -W t, PL' f - ~ s ' iR ".i A_. ~ _ / Y ® e a 1 w. d» ...K. em. < ~ ~ g l / ~ t°t I ! i-,r~.e~►' ~ t j awi w% . a„_~ ,..,.w • ~y I « / f » ®r ~ « a~~I~.'I~ 6ldr, , i ei { r .'r Q a } a~...i am w.~,.+ w+ L g, f. / 'Y °•P r.«. L~'•.. -rs'` I-^~~,~ ~ .~,~i ,~t °%°`F~ r.,:a sa`%:~ .w ,.«..w aba'....~.-1 f r r r`• J" o r \ 6 9 t «°i "°V yw° . 4 d i~ dLr'x t~\ g° re `t`^ f ~~^^rr (i 'r t? r° {^q 1i .r s k °c /~`.Ta.'~ -~V ~ t( t «.J, t « ~ iit i ; s ~ r• r.~'K.." i (di~ i t. t- a ew..~ ih.. « ~ ;y^.~~° ~`Sj'SC-~rr,.h~t ~ t~S'~; . ~y~► I 1 ~ r~ ~ fi ° -wr 1ti t t V M ! d~ ig~% $.rov c• r, i., 117 I till. cc -j k~ t ° V i I ~ r. ,.Ow a -..~Q~ tt \Y`~\ ti }iii g.«lt.~~ ~ i ~ r..- r• " ` •":w..» i. w S a" r+ w , T \ - 4 ioff Q• l}~i di ~ .t ° ttt t gi l« ~ t.«• 1 It t) Q ! aaR'a°~ 11}1 } ~ittV / r P r _M. `-ter 4 tm- _ j )d i ttt t)6 Igi fg tt r - P r• r, w r d..:.". ti \ t dig i} b tt \ ~ w ° ~ lild( gg,~tt \iti\\ .r `z f E" ww».«ue ' , i` tit a v t w» w..... ...w 1 ~ ' tati~ • 1~ t\\1 \ tM \ 1l a ~ I i " ' . , i•i u i::..~°r ..«..»,+r Lri 190011 » • M w EXISTING CODITIONS snioule~~fr #:,..c. HIGHWAY NO. 494 R.O. Y l v A, ! t 5r, ytj ~fNl " ¢,~1 ~fti. YN+!!7}y vi, 7'a t J ` s"eiai~{fy ® m. a , Q I ' ,J4 r -P: f I 4v CANOPI~ V, I 1 <o i,mr; L 1 a o~ Mgr I c TE.tI II Oil I t ~ c a. d ~ Sk 2 1 I~ k® m T Y~ii5 41 1 t `41_ mr~',~`'sus v w4r WO rt4 ' 1 °G - w - JV-W 24•°a IN .a m =V ~ r a y -r ~ a m s► ~ >t m m 44 a a J h om 4' 1 m___ 4 N 1 I Q I r . ! ` --r 306,00 ' 4 E PROPERTY L NE ses•2713°w ° qc c . SITE PLAN m c a~ i SUNDE ~r t ENGEt Ill a rnw [axT $ vnKC F o ew w, w. aswvn wcn mere ucs,» (a' w.. f' a f mr mu eor+ecr m - - _ t u k is~ , EM*.W Yia f. W r' ~ Y e { n. cH € e ' J \ € { { € ' KNOB RAIN•IREE I'EL AND W A i It AN ap i - ff 2 _ { - ~ t, 7 i 3 ° v- T2; T v r - - ,<as/ WJ _ t { SI Dt {.R' I arra;t ..wr w,oom. KM. <i v0~ ..a o e ! e t 4 + % s. + yi€ , ` 4 it 0 LILY. X5 aO ° - +Y' t i RAC1N Ef I~'~00~~-.9 i Rt1t t4}!t 1 - / , ! °Y j i ~y- a GRADOG, unurr° AND 18000ft S.r £ ~ I t E i I 1 Yom[ t C oolve E K yy.. Y 1 D ! { I ~ S t l~ I i. S 3e z r , t L L {.A , a ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 { tti - S''i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - ~e~ D L~ " r + l l +DUUi s e' ftt S i.r fie. r l k ..,t€ c } € 'i , I ' c .•-f'~ .t t a ~~/e~'- r dq > 1 s~ P~ s w m. } °8. E fr L ~'~Ji1' ' \j ~ y„rSY} 4 J i. D b } r' 1 D irwrc wiu t ~ a i I r Ali Gx ~rrp 3 t. 1! F_.I t- T~ & Y ,1i• RL a' 4RVle,. C f~ I7 $ S 1 r lYn .R4 lT G q 1 ,IL x e€ I Fetes 4.'" $ Y' z 3~. r[aarrrc ~ ~,•_,j_~ ~ ~ ~/J N > ! ~ L a . e o , . a « a r 1 a - iaswn a anauetD t~ ~ "-"4r~~ e~ ~'s. ariw.c~s~'rssawr s. s•+^ r..rww v....s ....r,.a rw a...w w ra.w !aa « aw..°, .a ar .rra. a,w.. ; F : € ~ S , l ~ -I€ € ~ ~ . 1 ~ Y . ~ fw a ro ..w .ww~ w..... w weu, a srs 6 B rrw i f •fi 3- - € ~ ~ ..d., e ~ 6 . } _ ts» e.rB atswn a. 't s > V O DS R v f. ...w Y.nn. ,aw ,..r. •ww. ra UwY _ n . a vra v-«} w ,w~- - - - - - - - ((V sI .w:. Es x ~ewY rn r.:rr «nv.,.. ww arc s,«w., ..«sw r.w r.r"s" w r.. rwi s ta.x MaB. • +.r a - - B: *~v ~ ..«.w w..a«rw v..`«.w.arr..ww w.. w rw...~+.. ..*r.r. r ~ e.r+.. s wro soo .w w ~ / l ss. a. c r txarrc n s W r w. ,u.aoa ~ w ~ rw-.+s .mow ~x.«+wr rw roor vr~..+r s ttas.a.sr tfwwr, f..+a w*M, s.*t.+ w rs a n. t a cacars air. _ - ~ sw*re ~ . , en . w.» cwsr~f wn an °Rwsrti +n aer r se. e w s n. s. n e n. s. a nnrt eb s cwt w . r o.L«a » ar. ,oa ssx, twwc r, w e,wre...° w.. wr.x ~re n a~w m awes star m . w.o ®wr.w rm . xox r + w rer«ae rw r.w n+ avwry &e (a ewerew w e wn«rH. ww wn..w. q ar aLx w.... • na.a w tlsx - ose,» a r,e. w +n awvr® w. ~e w..e.» xo tet s...,6 wr« a w awa w w « .ww wa w w w., - x .w x.n • r+,+wit~n ew. ens w «n.s,e e.crme .a.w•+a•r~ ..wm w.ae, r ~ M e,apr .~,w(vr i f~ «D. w ~w r wta ®aMast ; sa. w~rww® w. ran rw rv.~s f +.ah Bsa., +..8 w .w _ w.e. xw s. rwB E ~ r' 9'w.` ® s aw w _ «wuu r~'w. own ew.w w w r w «+w a wA h s +wD w w .w+ xw, , wAr/s «pB. +r rw » a » n s.) ew w a we6.:.a ra«. w eMy. w wa ww a . am Ewa. M ww a w ~ p x.~, w (s +l w «4w txr~+« . ax®. as A r w w +ca ew a) r ns.~,.s rw wan a w wmwe rrrwt rm..w °.ww ..w W, rw .x«. ,w. w r ~.r w «x « wa" cw aw w e.r.r. c«v. aw. SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES AND ttMtW, » x8ri Yes Mr+ M aM 4 4 ap w NN aMrtl. a w r M. rw r w w DETAILS ON SHEETS C2 ANO C3 w, w ~ rw« CITY Of EAGAN PROJECT NO. 1 of s OUVE) r 1 1 A 3 3 d 3341 A 1~!lt~1 #,i p HIGHWAY O. 494 v j (MN001 RIQ1I 1K WAY HAT W). 19 31) eta y~y ~ ~yb } 'J C 4 ( , , 11 ` t 1 C` m ' r ~ a P ~ ~ ii 1 , a \ ~ \ e.-✓'°~ Z' ra~ V {p+~ °a taZi ?l 41 ILI 1.4 - ~ d w.f _ ~ y ` ~ ~ aaaaaaaaaaaaa 1 r ~ 1 1, y i QY' I all 11 -11-111 • a _ •i' 1 i P lit . ' 10`1 1 1 , - ~i 1 J _!1 11 1 it r } ~I i 1 1' It "I tit 1► I ~ ~l~1t ,f Iii ! Via. ~ ~ z ' • t !t t~, ' n +t « t + a• «i~ Ctrlrki ILit R~~ ~t idi by { ` ~~~j ! - -t MIT tr!= I~ ~a; r« G I 1 ~r~ as 1 k 1 « ! 1 4 it r~ t rj 1 i#t•t FU j►fy o r' ! A i#1 r Ifs „ fill d r 1 Itt I ~x• l ~ ~ r ~ i~ = t t t t t = ~ tt ty t I Iv4' ~ ~ s~~-_,k=r ` (i 1 #JOIN r t / tlttr«~ _ ~«M r, tii i vvtvtv~~~ ff A e ! r I E1(i I E I .1 I i~ i~ i _ - _ . ~'>r . ~ ~ ~ e € a,,] ~ ~ t~~ wi • . 1 t~t4 i s; I~ fit' €~i~f r •O t 4 a s air t ( E1Et ~r ~ M # 2 1• -y _ A E tYfl I L\ i 1 t\\\111 1 i t t t tfX f°. ~ of ~ .~a4. r ~Y $ \ I Qs fiI ON Ivl,1 ).vM I", 111'HN (NtN") V617 '0N AV HJEH ISO PRELI INAMY LANDSCAPE PLAN DUI d ~Ilif~~ ~H-fl ~ rt+ ! ;d f.► A 11H ~ I III- c I'n° I IIIE. I s4 ° I~ fl I li~111 it e' - T ~l d z 00 E0 ii I MA i, I~il X31, 41 1c: -4 ga K m ( ' a to (o f 1 m ie h l I f o I g a C N r - i use®® ~c ELEVATIONS A. 24'-0" CKLIT Imp. . T PA 9 J IVI UAL TOWER. T L : ERS. ALL T. SIGN 2 R BACKLIT INDIVIDUAL t ATi F LETTERS. ALL T. ELEVATOR TO r, , n 1'-0" I R SIGN 3 BACKLIT INDIVIDUAL 1 EA. @ LOBBY ENTRY LETTERS. UNDER CANOPY. ; Tw W ALL T. r y PREFAB METAL ROOFING I'® SIGN 4~ ENTRY SIGN $a RICK MAIN ENTRANCE O' WOODS DR. m _ I ____BACKLIT 12'-0" ED LETTERS PROJECT I INFORMATION PRF« HOSPITALITY l.lC gAN4 TREE HOTEL -WATER PARK SIEGER A CHITECTS w„ •'F a4c 3447 CAPITAL RIVE - an woods Orw® Esa, mr„- of 4.2 SUN PRARIE, WI 535 90 Esg•n, M' sots 8= ,al 44- r 44• 41 Jab No. t MEMO to 1 y of agar TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF Y-X rC N DATE: JULY 113,1999 SUBJECT: SOUTHERN LAKES - HEIGHTS REQUEST ISSU : The City received a letter from . Jack Skoog, Chair of the Inver Grove Heigh r id creation Commission requesting that the City ofEagan consider not using the Soc ie Lakes Park for organized play and to amend the Joint Powers Agreement (See attachment,) IS : During 1996 the area now known Southern Lakes was being prel°inary platted thin the City of Inver Grove Heights. However, for home construction to occur, the development would have to receive utility services from the City of Eagan as Inver Grove Heights has nun yet extended truck utility lines to this area of their community. Upon receiving the request. io provide utility service, a number of concerns and issues thin the City ofEagan were raised, including water quality and parks. Because of the number of issues related to this subdivision, and the concerns of the City Council to insure that the City of Eagan did not subsidize this development i Inver Grove Heights in any way, staff was directed to develop a Joint Powers Agreement to address all the issues between the two communities. Agreement was reached in 1997 lowing this subdivision to proceed. Relative toparks, the agreement between the two cities, with the developer's concurrence, included neighborhood park that would provide a small b eld (200 feet foul lines) and a 150 x 250 soccer field overlay for the children of this area. These elements are typical in a neighborhood design. The ration for this park design was that the children from this subdivision would attend School District #196 schools; e a Elementary, Dakota Hifls 'le School and Eagan School. It was presumed that the youth from this area would join the Eagan Athletic Association rather then the Inver Grove eights Athletic Association, because children typically participate in sports with children they go to school with. With lots ° this proposed subdivision, it was presumed that there would be a significant number of Southern Lakes children playing in E sporting activities. Since the City of Eagan provides field space for EAA, this residents development could eventually place additional burden on the City of ag 's existing facilities. Attached is a memo addressed to City Administrator Hedges dated May 4, 1999 from the Director of Parks and Recreation. This memo provides further explanation of the requirement for, and the expected use of, the play fields by the children from the Southern Lakes Subdivision. reduction o the park plan and the Southern Lake Subdivision is attached. RESIDENTS CONCERNS: petition is attached that was signed by v Grove Heights residents that was directed to the C` of Inver Grove Heights. The 46 signatures represent 2 `es within the subdivision. This represents approximately % of the 242 lot subdivision. The last phase o this subdivision is still to developed. recent letter o . Sullivan is also attached that finther elaborates on the concerns of the residents who border the park, Staff previously received at least two phone calls o neighbors of the Inver Grove Heights park expressing their concerns that the fields would be used for organized athletic play. The City of Inver Grove Heights and some of the neighbors are aware of the Commission meeting and may be present to address their concerns. The attach letters and petitions should be read carefully to fully understand the resident's stated objections. general, their complaints could be summarized as follows. ■ They did not o of the park and its use before they purchased their lot. They say the developer never told them of the park plans. ■ The Park is too small, or too big for its intended use by teams. ■ They don't want teams coming from outside the area to use the park for games. ■ There is no parking lot, or not enough parking, or only on-street king. ■ It is not safe to use the park because of the parking problem The ark should provide other play items that children c use rather then b eld. DISCUSSION: This is a complex issue the Commission is being asked to review. preparing a recommendation, ere are many perspectives to consider. Everyone would prefer to see teams use community parks or school fields for programmed play, but for the Eagan Athletic Association that is not, nor h it ever been, the case. Neighborhood parks have ways been a place for youth games. The number o children playing sports recreationally and the Association's desire to open participation to younger children has meant that neighborhood parks must be s to accommodate the number of teams, ow frequently games are played at any one site greatly depends on the number of k i children participating in activity. This department has ways made effort to program all "community" fields first before moving to "neighborhood" facilities for programmed games. It's important to remember that neighborhood parks are not used for travel ¢ , *rts, but for entry level programs where the number ofp articipants are high. ,ks c uid's ~ r,iature into the middle school age, the number ofparr"^ - . decline and the sire o F thc" ~'j accommodate them increases. These youth .a.; -.hen get moved to lai-g r fi ; s appropriate for their age and increased ability. Practices are at the ac's discretion and are typically held at parks at are within their neighborhoods because of ease o access. Again, older youth move to community fields that are of e appropriate size where they are assigned to play games, while younger childre ,l use neighborhood and elementary school facilities. Staff has found that once the "season- egiias, practices are very, very infrequent for most youth teams, particularly with a relatively short (7- k) season. Fortunately, several of agan's parks have off-street parking to accommodate this use; examples are Walnut Hill and Bridle Ridge. There are also parks where off-street parking one is utilized, or combined t very small parking lots. Lexington Park on F:a'an's northside is programmed for use as are Woodhaven and Ridgecliff Parks, for example. Until a few years ago, even tiny O Chase Park was used for soccer! What does the park in the Southern e development offer in terms ofparking? There is no off-street parking for t °s park. There does not appear to be any possibility for adding any either. Thep k does have approximately 625 feet of street frontage for parking, which intrudes, on no adjacent home frontage. ark plan is attached). What is the solution? That depends on what you define the problem to be and if you deem it a problem that needs a solution now! If you define the problem as 242 living units eventually having children wanting to play youth sports (soccer, softball, baseball) and needing a place to play, en you have to find a solution at involves place for the children to play their games. this is not the loc-tion, does Inver Grove Heights have alternative site that can be used? Should there have v - cash dedication allowing Eagan to build other field at other location for these c';1dren 10 1) se'! Will there even be problem? The field was not programmed for use in 1999 because there were not enough children o this subdivision to warrant assignment of this field for use. Placed in proportion; of the 4700+ EAA participants this summer, 63 Iver Grove eights youth who are pupils at e Pine Elementary are playing softball, baseball or socer 'th EAA_ Of the 6 children; 13 are residents of Southern es. Until such time that Southern es participation creates a team in a spot these Inver Grove Heights youth will be accommodated at Eagan neighborhood parks. It should be understood that the agreement with Inver Grove does not give exclusive use of the field to the City o Eagan, rather it shall be made available to serve the residents located within the property" Now may not be the right time to make decision one way or the other. It's staff s understanding that the fifth phase is just now being developed. There are 77 lots in this phase, representing about 35% of the subdivision total. There still are a number o vacant lots in the first four phases o new homes under construction. If there is to be a change in the park's status and design, should that be done now or put o until these homes are built and occupied so the future residents also have a voice the outcome? Is this design really problem or are there some revisions that c be made, such as a reduction in the size of the backstop? Do the current residents adequately present the problem and the solutions to be considered. There are also the "what if' considerations: ® at if EAA programs o not grow? There has been some leveling o in the baseball program. Will t °s field even be needed or would other neighborhood field currently being used not be scheduled? Perhaps this neighborhood won't have as many youth as expected and the field won't be needed. Perhaps the school bound is changed and the area is no longer ° the Eagan school attendance area. • What if Inver Grove were to come up with other solution to the problem of providing field space? What if the Commission were to get requests from residents around other neighborhood parks in Eagan asking that games not be played on fields in their park? Some neighbors have expressed a preference for play equipment, as alternative to the existing design. Is it possible to install play equipment in the park without taking out the field space, and if not, what about installing the equipment ` the other park areas that were included in t °s subdivision? FOR S ACTION: The Commission should consider all the alternatives, the perceptions and assumptions and the potential pact on a y ratified Joint Powers Agreement. Potential include: Recommendation to amend the Joint Powers Agreement to delete the condition of requiring play fields, with or without stipulations. Recommendation to withhold lion until some firture point in time or h a specific condition is achieved. ■ Recommendation to make no changes in the Joint Powers Agreement, y !1 E City i INVERGROVEHEIGHTS May 14, 1999 Eagan Park and Recreation Commission c/o Eagan k and Recreation Department g Municipal Center 3830 Not o . Eagan, NIN 55122 Dear Eagan ark and Recreation Commissioners, On behalf of the Inver Grove eights Park and Recreation Coi-ninissio-a and the new residents to our community in the Southern Lakes development, I ,yin writing to request that your community reconsider the potential use of the ballfield this area by the Eagan Athletic Association. you are aware, the potential use oft this field for organized sports has drawn eat deal o criticism from the people that have just recently moved into this new subdivision. Because the field lies thin and adjacent to residents property, people are concerned that the lack of off-street parking, vegetative screening, permanent restroo facilities, the sheer size of the backstop and fencing, and the possibility of organized play with its traffic and noise, have all combined to galvanize the neighborhood against the field. It is our understanding that the Eagan Athletic Association does not intend to use the field for organized play and that the first step in amending the Agreement between our two cities, with respect to the ballfield, would be to have your op make a recommendation to your City Council. We seek your support in joining t the Southern I_.a~ s neighborhood and the Park and Recreation Commission in our community to rec ra i that the field not be used for organized play. Sincerely, )Jack Skoog, Chair Park and Recreation Commission 8150 BARBARA AVENUE - INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, IVIN 55077 TELEPHONE (612) 450-2500 - CITY OFFICE FAX (612) 450-2502 - POLICE FAX (612) 450-2543 t MEMO F- city of eagan TO: a Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Ken a, Director r and Recreation DATE: May 4,1999 SUBJECT: Southern Lakes ar ; use by Eagan Athletic Association programs The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify understandings concerning the potential use of the park in the Southern Lakes Development i Inver Grove eight for Eagan Athletic Association programs, The Joint Powers Agreement, ratified in 1997 by the cities of Eagan and Inver Grove eights forms the basis for this memorandum. Background: The park i the Southern Lakes Development was one element of a development process which resulted ° a Joint Powers Agreement i which the City of Eagan is to provide water, sewer, storm water drainage and street access to a development i the City o Inver Grove eights. Development of the Joint Powers Agreement was the result of meetings over more than a years' time among Engineering, Community Development and Parks and Recreation staff from the two cities and the Developer. The minutes of the January 21, 1997 Advisory Parks Commission meeting include a report from Parks and Recreation Director Vr indicating at discussion of a Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights concerning Southern Lakes was in progress. (copy of minutes attached) The City of Eagan recommending a layield with a soccer overlay since children living in the area would attend Red Pine Elementary would likely participate in sports activities in Eagan. The signed Joint Powers Agreement addresses park dedication fees and land requirements. The Agreement further states: "All such dedicated land shall be made available for the non-exclusive use and scheduling by g Athletic Association activities to serve the needs of the residents located within the Property". (copy attached) The rational for this park is very simple and straightforward. The APrC recognized that this residential development would have a number of children who would eventually sign up for EAA programs because they would attend e Pine Elementary School, which is within the EAA a boundary for participation. Given at this would place a "burden" on Eagan facilities, this developer was required to provide a small ballfield and small soccer field overlays for the 44 neighborhood children, who presumably would beenrolled in EAA. The intent 'b flog that this subdivision would e have its a facility for the youth that come from within. It was generally understood at the park would be constructed in advance of home construction. Individuals purchasing lots / homes adjacent to the park could make their a determination as to if they perceived the park as a desirable amenity or something that would not agree with their lifestyle, prompting e to seek different location. Issue: Residents of the Southern Lakes Development have expressed opinions at the park should not be used for organized activity: A The ballel is too small The homes are too close to the park ➢ Sufficient parking is not available A Residents from other areas will come to use this park. Discussion: The park is not currently (1999) allocated to the Eagan Athletic Association for organized activities. That will not occur until such t°e that participant registrations from the Red Pine Elementary School attendance area, includeing residents of the Southern Lakes Development, in sufficient numbers to establish team(s) comprised of children from that neighborhood. Given that this area is still new and some time away from full development, its likely to other year or two until there are sufficient numbers of children enrolled in to sports. The age group assigned to utilize the park would be age appropriate for the park. The field is only "too small" if it w to be scheduled for older youth. The field w purposely kept small (as defined by the distance from home plate to the outer limits of the outfield) so to service the younger children it is expected to. This may be for games or organized practices with the neighborhood coach for soccer, softball or baseball. On street parking would service the activity during the :00-:00 P time frame, typical for organized sports and also typical for some of Eag s parks. Not all of Eagan parks have off-street parking. Woodhaven and Lexington are two examples where use is scheduled now by groups but where ere is no o street parking. The IGH Park has off street parking available along the parks perimeters at does not conflict with residents homes, perhaps y 1 spaces. Residents of IG have expressed a concern at residents o other areas would come to use this park for games. And that is why a park for this sub-division was seen important, so the children is this sub-division would not have to go into other parks to for practice orgames. Summaa The vision of a neighborhood park for the Southern Lakes Subdivision w to insure that a facility would be available for their children who will likely be participating in E youth sports programs, and not to place den on Eagan parks and facilities that are currently heavily programmed. This field is not programmed for use i 1999 because there are not sufficient numbers of children signed up yet in EAA. This is not expected to occur until the subdivision has reached full development or the ages of children have advanced to qualify for programs. K 13.3 DRAINAGE Q AGAN. No increase of storm water runoff from g will be directed or allowed to a onto property or `tote storm drainage ponds or system locate within I , beyond the aunt o runoff which existed its natural undeveloped condition, without the express written approval r GH Engineer and en only ' accordance with the terms of this Agreement. ARTICLE 1 DEDICATION PARK 14.1 FEES. IGH agrees to remit to Eagan the most c er - Dedication Fee per residential lot for each residential lot created within the Property. The total park fees calculated for each newly led residential subdivisionshall be aid by IG to Eagan prior to I 's release of the plat for recording purposes. No Park Dedication Fee shall be owe to Eagan for any non-residential development o the Property. 14.2 LAND. k land dedication, " accordance with a "s standards, shall be provided with each newly platted residential subdivision, as determined by the City of Eagan. Any park land dedication shall be within I Any land edicaT of park purposes shall be credits against the park dedication fees require under Article 14.1. All such dedicated shall be made available for the non-exclusive use and scheduling o Eagan Athletic Association activities to serve the needs o the residents located within the Property. 14.3 WATER I. I shall provide Eagan with all grading, drainage and erosion control plans that relate to the development of the Property. IG shall implement all water quality measures as determined by Eagan, pursuant to aan's Water 4-~ r ' VmSORy PA , RECREATION AND NATURAL REsouRcEs COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 21, 1997 MEETING PAGE 1 12, - 1 in the Evergreen development site. . Protective Tree Measures (i.e. t polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall Installed at the rip Line or at the perimeter the Critlcal Root Zone, whichever greater, of significant trees/woodlands preserved. The developer shall contact the City o ion at least a days or the Issuance o the ding permit ensure compliance the approved Tree Preservation Plan. This developmentshall meet Its water quality mitigation requirements through construction of a detention pond. The design of the pond must be approved the water resources coordinator. 10. An ungraded buffer at least 1 feet In width shall maintained around the wetland o the western parcel. 11. Filling or draining of elan shall prohibited. OLD BUSINESS IVER R E EIGHTS -1 I E S EE E Director raa noted at the discussion of Joint Powers Agreement between the ry of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights was based on the development of Southern Lakes. That development will get se ices from the ry of Eagan and the children living there will attend e Pine Elementary School. Since is area will most likely participating in sports and school aties within Eagan a recommendation is in made at a la eld with a soccer overlay Incorporated within the development. It is also being suggested at parking considered near the park area. More discussions will occur with Inver rove Heights and the developer regarding is proposal, Vraa concluded. WORKNG DRAFT SCHOOL/CITY LL IEL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Director Vraa Introduced is Item stating at Dakota ills Middle School/Eagan i School had approached the ry to allfield maintenance on their site on a contract basis. Some preliminary work has been done, however staff is seeking feedback from the Commission on the agreement. Superintendent Olson pointed out that ere are 4 baliel adjacent aka ills Middle School at are Included In the request. Tasks Included In the proposed maintenance agreement were reviewed were the tasks at would not Included. The fees being proposed were based the approved City f schedule at Is adopted each year. The costs maintain mowers and equipment were also reviewed In is analysis. Olson continued that Phase 1, enovado re- n Preparation would recommended maintenance since is would brie the fields to a level consistent with the Ory, s facilities. The various levels of maintenance were provided the school district could select is components a old like Incorporate based on the dollars available em for is work. Olson added that the estimate to maintain the four fields, based the ry` s own maintenance standards, would $25,654 per year. Member Vincent asked what the Incentive was to do is a for the school districL Director Vraa responded at providing quality fief at the hi sch Vmi le school for the community during the summer would mean at the ty would not have build more accommodate the need. As long as the el are well maintained and used, and the City, s costs are covered, is appears to be a benefit everyone. Vraa added at staff would want to see a 2 year minimum con ma ensure at the el could properly prepared. 30 33 0 14 ~a g \ PARK P I~ OUTLOT 8 nn a 24 _ +aa , u A L-1 Sao-) U JA >M rn r p,ir~ pn \ \ r ~ _ PARK >1 PON J W « \n , j »w W rsr »...ye an an ar» c+ » xwx .~+a ax \r n / _ r / HaM .pi` a r O \ n ~7- / e et 0.i4®n 24 83 fir'; ss ra 76 \ f ~ \i A ~ ~ _n ~ w * r 77 i - 76 13 f3 Ya an r u a :z n Q rx:. l ,a u i PARK . r ri » d \x r OUTLOT A w., n na v vi, i Asa $ 4 ' , 23 w ..a ✓ f` _Ma. C ~ F,rw ~ .a.r /(,jNw y w« ~.~sa » M + ~..r _n »w ~ V W r . ulda/arga `M ' 62 n « -x+»n 4\ n » r x. ~ ~ n M , a 2T wa 13 ,a Ya_ _ ~xM» 53 13 -7 w 42 1 ti am _ d 35 34 as 3 35 rot 4N ()c",ae A r . a a " O Q L e TOE OPE i NGUTATS ar- ~y \250.3' \ 2f.E RAU 95Q1 925.9 w a 1 SOCCCR f1E10 4 lJ V 1 924 9 sx Z3 j ~M ~ ' • 24.0 y3'~ ~ 4® ~I 2$ HOPE PIPE--"*' 9 \ 923.3 ti F . ' 925.3 ! ! A/ SASMAU WO % 24.1 ®'x•0 ~ 924.0 ®924 one _FENCE % OoNyR~CWM $KAU MOOSE 24 POE POKA TO CW AE40NG TN ` - T ` - Y: / FnN05 TOf., t;x;AnCO w O"IAM ..0. 4° FROM CENTER UNE OF PIPE. ® Fm 5 DELINEA TED) 5 laON t SEEDN t5 Nq{ F W.0 , CON y 14URP 922.8 1.t2 AC-FT T6AND UYIT .-a0 g9 N : -.a iv • 't6 AC-FT VOL EA. :-O L _ E FLT t •a t7^ y \ NM 919.0 / r \ e 'i.o 4, y9, 2.-~:? '~'a ~ F/. ,Y `,Y / ~ ~ ..1 X o,®f, ~ ~ \ p} , 1 • ' L'6 ` r 924 9'6 932 89x4 06/28/99 ON 08:15 FAX 651 450 2490 Park and Rec Dept. 002 May 12, 1999 Inver rove eights City Council Inver Grove Heights Park Commission Inver Grove Heights Director of Parks & Recreation Inver Grove eights Mayor 150 Barbara venue Inver Grove Heights, 55077 Dear Council Members, Commissioners, Director, and Mayor, As most of you are well aware, we, the residents of the Southern Lakes develol have been working for several months to resolve a number of issues relating to the R. k located within our neighborhood. We are now optimistic, thanks in large part to ti-e persistence of Councilor George Tourville, at one of our greatest concerns, the use of the athletic fields an the property for organized, scheduled activities, is close to resolution. Because the decision on this matter is now ° the hands o the Eagan City Council and Eagan Athletic Association, our purpose in writing this letter is to address the other issue central to is situation, how the park is to be developed. If, is our hope, the Eagan Athletic Association determines that the park is neither suitable nor safe for organized play, we believe that the playing field should be scaled da to a more appropriate size for neighborhood, recreational use. This would present a more aesthetically appealing look, and allow for playground equipment to be safely located on the property. As the field currently stands, any proposed play equipment would need to be placed o the perimeter of the park, very near the street. It is our hope that a playground and a ball field could co-exist safely on the park property. If it were determined, however, that this is not the case, the vast majority of neighborhood residents would like to see the playground take priority and the ball field removed. As has been mentioned at several previous Park Commission meetings, there is a great need for a playground in the southwestern of Inver Grove eights. What we are looking for is central gathering place where the residents c meet, along with their children. We would like to see modest playground, some picnic tables, paths leading to the playground e from the street, and signs o the roads leading to the park cautioning motorists to drive slowly and be aware ofchildren playing in the area. We would 1 7 ape to see some concern given to the appearance of the park. At is time, otr_s I the rather poorly maintain wetland on one side, there are no trees or other greens _y anywhere in the park. As alluded to previously, a number one concern, with regard to the development o this property, is having place for the neighborhood children to 6514502490 CITY A AN ,TEL=6516 14612 06/28199 08:18 06/28/99 MUN 08:16 FAX 651 450 2490 Park and Rec Dept. 4003 play. W do, however, take pride i our neighborhood and would like that pride to extend to our city's parks. Although the design and planning of this park have been a disaster from the start, we believe it is not too late to make u for things one wrong. The residents of the Southern Lakes development are blaming neither the City of Inver Grove eights, nor any group representing it, rather process that was awed o the start. What we would like to do is move on, work together, and develop a park o which we c all be proud. In summary, we are requesting a commitment o the City Council, Park Commission, and the Department o s Recreation to the following: 1) Continued support in working with the City of Eagan and Eagan Athletic Association to ensure there be no organized play on the fields of the Southern Lakes Park it presents a safety hazard to the children of the neighborhood well as those using the field 2) Creation of a safe, attractive gathering place for the neighborhood residents and their children through the addition of playground equipment, picnic tables, paths to the park, signage, landscaping, and maintenance of the grounds. 3) Communication to the residents of any developments relating to either of the two previous items. Most of the residents of the Southern Lakes neighborhood are new to Inver Grove Heights. We've moved here because we believe this city is heading in a positive direction and has a eat deal of potential. We sincerely hope to be a part of this positive growth of our city. Thank you for your time and effort in is matter. Sincerely, r Jennifer Wilson Representing the residents of Southern Lakes J~. 6514502490 = CITY F PAGAN TEL=6516814612 06/28199 08:19 05,`18-'99 10:45 FAT 651 437 0868 OCH INDUSTRIES INC. 002 TIMOTHY J- SLTLLlVA-N 10810 lertore ay Inver Grove eights, NIN 55077 May 13, 2999 Mr, Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Organized Athletic lay on the Southern Lakes Park in Inver rove 116'2"hts Dear Tom: Thank you for spending time with me, Mayor Pat Awada, and my neighbor, Mark Engdahl, last Friday to discuss our concerns over the proposed use of the Southern 1, gas neighborhood park in Inver Grove Heights. You were candid and helpful as always. As a follow-ap to our conversation, I write to express our neighborhood's concerns over a proposal by the Eagan Athletic Association (EA A) to begin organized play in the Southern Lakes park next year. I also write on behalf of our neighborhood to request that the city drop its p for org 'zed play for the Southern Lakes Park. We make this request based in part on the following concerns: Organized flay i the Southern Lakes Park Would Be Unsafe: We believe that organized play in the Southern Lakes park would be unsafe for the neighborhood and for visitors. There is no formal parking area at or near the park, Consequently, parking would need to be on the residential streets surrounding it. Given the park's small size, there is simply not room to safely handle the increased traffic that organized play would attract. In addition, our neighborhood has many all children. Without appropriate parking spaces, the increased level of traffic poses significant safety hazard to these children and to the children who would be attending orFal.,.~ zed play events at the park. Organized lay old Be Incompatible with the Physical Space: The park is simply not physically suitable for organized play. The park is small (below athletic regulation size) and is surrounded on two sides by houses whose backyards immediately adjoin the park. Errant balls, either from the baseball or soccer field, would regularly find their y onto neighborhood yards and private property. This raises nuisance issues for the owners and for any organized league. The park is surrounded on other side and one-hal f by a wetland and by open ter. Numerous ,4' 3 05.18.99 10:45 FAT 651 437 0868 KOC INDUSTRIES INC. Z003 errant balls would inevitably end up in the water, 'sing additional nuisance, safety, and liability questions. Organized lay Is Incompatible with agau Guidelines for Neighborhood Parks: As you know, the city of Eagan already makes a distinction between neighborhood and co n ty parks. the city's guidelines note, neighborhood parks are generally smaller, do not have organized play, and are offered for the benefit of residents within walking distance. Areas designated as community parks are larger, generally provide parking, and feature organized play. We believe that, by any fair and definition, the Southern Lakes park is a neighborhood, not a corrun `ty park, should be treated according to the same standards as a neighborhood park in Eagan. We raise these concerns now because Southern Lakes residents were not infonnned by the city of Inver Grove Heights, the developer, or the builders that the park had be offered to the city of Eagan for organized play. As a consequence, neighborhood residents could not and did not make informed buying decisions. We only found out later, after the fact, which is why we are making the case now. We certainly appreciate that the city of g has extensive demands for park space, especially for organized play. We also understand the special role of the Eagan Athletic Association (FAA) in supervising these efforts. Plowever, for the same reasons outlined above, the Southern Lakes park will not serve Eagan residents or the EAA well either- As I sure you are aware, our neighborhood has repeatedly raised these concerns with the city of Inver Grove Heights. We understand that Inver Grove Heights Mayor Joe Atkins has highlighted them to Mayor Awada and to several members of the Eagan City Council in a recent meeting. We appreciate the interest of Mayor Awada and other Eagan officials to remedy this situation as soon as possible. We hope that city officials in both municipalities ,%71I continue to talk in an effort to find a t°ely solution. Toward that end, we would appreciate being notified of any meetings in Eagan at which this issue might be addressed, both for the benefit of Southern Lakes residents and for the city of Inver Grove Heights. Specifically, we would welcome opportunity to make a presentation to either the Eagan Parks and Recreation Board or to the City Council, or to both, in an effort to resolve this issue. Thank you for your terest in this issue and for your consideration of our requests. We look forward to e front you soon about the appropriate follow-up steps. S roger t :r ull`v 05.18.-99 10:45 FAY 851 437 0888 KOCH INDUSTRIES INC_ la001 C.C. Mayor Atkins Mayor Awada Mazk Engdahl • _ s t t The residents of the Southern Lakes subdivision in Inver rove eights have et and respectfully submit the following as our position regarding the Parkland currently located within the subdivision. We request your support in fulfilling these requests. We request that the Parkland be use for the purpose a outlined by the Developer a Builders when the lots i this subdivision were (are) being marketed. Specifically that this is neighborhood n of community ball field. We believe this to be supported y the Joint Powers agreement that indicates the land shall be used to serve the needs the residents located within the Property. As such we request the following: 1. The backstops and dugouts should be removed. are not appropriate forte size the space available, the to intent of the Parkland or the needs of the neighborhood as le. . There all be n Organized lay on the parkland. 3. With the removal the current apparatus, would like the City's l cooperation n support in locating safe playground system on the Parkland property. e not feel i i the responsibility o the Developer) Attached are the signatures of the residents of Southern Lakes who support this proposal. We, the Homeowners of Southern Lakes subdivision in Inver Grove Heights, agree that the following needs to occur with the park located thin the development in order for the park to fulfill theneeds of the residents: NAME/SIGNATURE ADDRESSTHONE ,Sol 44 0 ~3 1 t~?i'~ p / r JQ~t c4 C~ ~towt 0 2. t k G✓ l r t L.G ..Sri 19 L ~ct2To - S" 5~ s~ cm I. 1V 0 ~ F'r r 7 ~Y Del v Xe, 49Lk A) tb 7-~ ) r ~s 14 9 ea NAME/SIGNATURE ADDRESS/PHONE 10 ®)a MR IAC-K ) qc- AtcicAmDRA c-T J. 14 d7 r-1 a"IS --7 12 c7 +Q_ 7 1 L)j r~ (n E 1 Q 15 ✓r ty^v. ~pC 16 sD 976 b Fr lA _ t 1 17 k 1 J .a At, 4w y S--~ 1 - ` A- - - 19 {f A f ~~r9 IZ2 20 P,7 21 Lt 2 ibI4 22 23 /r DWAr 1 C, _L /-25 ItA f ~+J"v Name/Signature dress hone IVA) 2. I l 4. . . 7. . 9. 1. 11. 1. 13. 1. 15. Name/Signature dress/ hone /fJ 5 3 T 14 , 1 w, r . 1. . . . . . 7. . 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 14. 15. r Zc,,5 p ure re [rh e t -77 f ®o/x . 1053 6 d4 e 96P 4~. 0+ 'AQ kw~ 5Yl 5. 7. Chery! Nufamann (osl-~ts~- t / tt~3v f~'+-fan ~OUrfj .~6-t~ 55D°~~ 8. 411::5419 6~56 "2"2 tai / f° d 'd L 10.x, 111 121 13/ 141 15r Nam I e/i nature Address/Phone /Gj3 .z tai717 -,r3. c rt k'u j~Gulo "A-- 44 F, / G-f 7-`ir } . . 5. 6. 7. 8. . 1. it 12. 13. 1. 1. Name/Signature dress/ hone 5&, 77 f 1 riG Zti.~ . 4. 5. . T . 10. 11. 1. 1. 1. 15. r Name/Sign ure Address/ Phone SI - aS- 731 a ( 4 t C -4-1 izrcxs% co LA 3. {~w 5. . 7. . 9. 1. 11. 12. 13, 1. 15. a I • i Name/Signature dress hone 1. ~P A U b 1~ t~~ i a Ns Fhr 61~ ©s f f 3. 6. . . . 1. 11. 1. 1. 1. 1. Name/Signature Address/Phone 1. 2 tt r1 f( 3. . 5. . 7. . . 1. 11. 1. 13. 14. 15. Name/Signature Address hone 44. 2. ~z . 4. 5. 7. . . 1. 11. 12. 13. 1. 1. CITY OF EAG EXPENSE REPORT OF 06/30/99 CURRENT Y.T.D. BUDGET TO 7F MONTH ACTUAL ACTUAL PERC AFT OBJECT DESCRIPTION BUD-- ACTUAL EXPENSE VARIANCE rX.- FUND 328 PARK SITE ACUISITIOI '/I ; P 4311 LEGAL 0.00 131.30 131.30 4328 SPECIAL EVENTS/ ADMISSION FEES 0.00 3,478.75 3,478.75 SUBTOTAL OTHER SERVICES AND Cli 0.00 3,610.05 3,610.05 4510 LAND D LAND IMPROVEMENTS 3.59 1,959.17 1,959.17 SUBTOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 3.59 1,959.17 1,959.17 4610 PROJECT-COmm CT 0.00 (20,062.52) (20,062.52) 4616 PROJECT-LE L 0.00 (1,272.50) (1x272.50) 4651 DESIGN & I' INEERING 0.00 5,821.49 5,821.49 4654 UTILITIES-FCONSTR 149.90 244.90 244.90 4656 BUILDINGS/E- _ 'TURES PARK ST 0.00 9,702.19 9,702.19 4657 SEEDING PARK CONSTR 0.00 687.96 687.96 4661 ATHLETIC FUP--SHING-PARK C STR 373.43 1,925.14 1,925.14 4662 SPECIAL FEATURES/FURNISHING PK 2,112.35 4,833.18 4,833.18 4663 TRAILS-PARK CONSTRUCTION 0.00 5,142.93 5,142.93 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,635.68 7,022.77 7,022.77 4710 TRANSFER OUT 0.00 1,740.00 11740.00 SUBTOTAL TRANSFERS O 0.00 1,740.00 1,740.00 CURRENT Y.T.D. BUDGET T ANNUAL MONTH ACTUAL ACTUAL PERCENT OBJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED FUND PARK SITE ACQUISITION/DEVELOP TOT 2,639.27 14,331.99 14,331.99 r ri CITY AG Page 3 REVENUE -PORT OF 06/30/99 CURRENT Y.T.D. BUDGET TO ANNUAL MONTH ACTUAL ACTUAL PERCENT OBJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED FUND 328 PARK SITE ACQUISITION/DEVELOP 3855 PARK DEDICATION 153,640.00 297,588.00 297,588.00 SUBTOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 153,640.00 297,588.00 297,588.00 3821 BUILDING RENT 750.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 3850 CONTRIBUTIONS D DONATIONS 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 SUBTOTAL OTHER REVENUE - 750.00 11,500.00 11,500.00 CURRENT Y.T.D. BUDGET TO ANNUAL MONTH ACTUAL ACTUAL PERCENT OBJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED FUND PARK SITE ACQUISITION/DEVELOP TOT 154,390.00 309,088.00 309,088.00 To: APRC Fro : Eagan Athletic Association Date: July 19, 1999 Dear Con issioners: For the past several months the Eagan Athletic Association (E AA) has (7~ actively working on a plan f o r a facility to meet the owing pains of o i l 1 association. The EAA board has defined and approved the project(s) that we feel will not only be a asset to E AA, but our entire community. Our youth athletic association is owing! With over 6,000+ families, 11,000+ participants, 2,000+ adult volunteers, 14 different sport programs, $250,000+ worth of sport equipment and $25,000+ worth of computer hardware; we need a place to centralize our daily CEpcr..itions. At your August lnicCLi~1g the Eagan Athletic Association will bring forward for your recommendations, our proposal for Eagan's future Recreation & Community Center. I you have any questions, please feel free to call e at 651-452-7861. Thank you, an le er EAA President t ~_5 MEMO i T: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION FROM: A RK_. -Y - -ION DOROTHY FFTERS N, PA LS N. , q" ~ &A DATE: JAI; 14, 1399 SUBJECT: CIF VY 2000-2004 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the process used byth( 1 vo ac lu,s consensus on the FY 2000-2004 CIP for parks and to submit the proposed documei tl Commission far recommendation to the City Council for adoption. BACKGROUND: The Commission met in 8 workshop sessions beginning in mid-April. In addition the Acquisition and Development sub committee met on two occasions and performed field review to study en Spa issues. The CIP workshop discussions took a global approach; wo: ci - as a whole to its various distinct parts. The Commission's preferences for tel es of es 4` t s, parks, and pz )'i;,ct s were discussed. In addition categories of acquisition and the role of partnerships were reviewed. Input was requested from community groups such as the Eagan Athletic Association, the astview AL.11._ Association, the Arts and Humanities Council and the schools with whom joint powers agreements are in place and/or a City park provides a school's playfields. Staff provided a review of projects already co tied to, overview of the status offOrMs in dic Par' ~it4 Fund and the projected revenue over the next 5 years. The Commission recommends to of $2,355,000 during the 5 years of the CIP. ISCSSI : 'Tbe Commission's preferences as identified in the workshop sessions are: Categories of expenditures: • Development • Refurbishment • Acquisition Categories of parks: • Neighborhood Parks • Community Athletic • Community Parks • Special Use • Conservancy) en Space 1 Categories of projects: • Master plans, i.e. Patrick Eagan • Playgrounds • Parking lot lighting • Restrooms • Landscaping • Facilities for new sports • Benches • Shelters • Consultants Categories of acquisition • Add to existing parkland • Neighborhood Parks • Trail links • Tax forfeiture • Expansion--lease/easement agreements Partnerships, existing and potential were brought into the discussion. Examples are: • Faithful Shephard School • School Districts • Blue Cross Blue Shield • Other communities e.g. Southern Lakes When partnerships are considered, a commitment of some cash value should be considered. The Commission next brainstormed their preferences among potential projects by categories. The resulting list included: Development: Neighborhood Parks: • Potential from the Cedarvale Taskforce study • Royal Oaks • Sun shelter(s) Community Athletic Parks • North Park (soccer) • Parking lot lights at Northview Lexington Di ey • Field lights for soccer • Asphalt hockey rink (s) • Tennis court lighting • Football • Baseball • New or minor sports Community Parks • Blackhawk parking lot lights • Patrick Eagan Development • Sun shelter (Fire Administration Building beams) • Patrick Eagan parking lot • Thomas Lake parking lot Conservancy * Patrick Eagan Park Special Use • Senior citizens; indoc» and outdoor needs • Holz Farm improvements • Cascade Bay * e "bubble" • Civic Arena; indoor park • Scenic Enterprises potential en Space • Stonecliff trails Refurbishment Neighborhood Parks * 11 playgrounds • Ridgecliff soccer 0 Rahn Park; south wooded area Community Parks * Thomas Lake parking lot Acquisition Neighborhood Parks • C arvale Taskforce findings Community Athletic Parks * North Park Community Parks Trail connection, Municipal Center campus to Patrick Eager:.....: en Space • Findings of the en Space sub-committee May 24, 1999 the Commission considered the suggestions for projects received from the various community organizations. The projects the Commission wish to include in the on-going dis. x.3i as were: Lighted soccer fields, additional soccer fields, baseball fields; Master plan for Pt-r: ' " , ~k; Master plan for Holz Farm, restrooms for Holz Farm, reroofing the barn, additional land; Holz a ; North Park, asphalt rink (s). The Open Space sub-committee presented its prioritized list of potential parcels and asked that the list in total remain open for discussion. At the JuIv .13, 1999 workshop, the members present reviewed the projects and years proposed to be done, recugiuzing that each year would again be reviewed on an annual basis. Further, thi- Cornniissilo i decided to develop m estimate for "interest earning„ for the five years provid 1. This has r ;.:i and added to the proposed revenue. The Commission then determined ~r` t"econimtaldc expenditure would be considered as "undesignated" to be used for cu '-ion _r e --vs is future years. -7 3? Status o the Park Site Fund: 1998 Audited balance:. $2,290,700 Revenue as of 4/30/99.. .125,000 $2,415,700 1999 expenditures and encu races: Walden Heights Park $85,000 Rahn tennis court repair 35,000 Grant property clean up 25,000 Captain Dodd soil 5,000 $150,000 Lexington Diffley • Landscape $ 5,000 • Bituminus 7,000 • Buildings carryover 25,000 Patrick Eagan 200,000 Caponi trail connection 25,000 Lexington Park parking 2,000 $264,000 Expenditures through 4/30/99 15 500 Total: ( 429,500) Available funds: - $ 1,986,200 Projected revenue 300,000 (75,000 x 4 years) Interest estimate 238,800 (5 year estimate) Advent Methodist Church ..................................................25 000 $2,550,000 The Commission recommends expenditures of $2,355,000 in the FY 2000-2004 CI Global breakdown of expenditures: Set aside, 1 I playgrounds $ 275,000 Acquisition 725,000 Small projects set aside 100,000 Neighborhood Parks 235,000 Community Athletic 765,000 Community Parks 150,000 Special Use 105,000 Proposed 5 year expenditure $2,355,000 Undesignated 45,000 $2,400,000 -7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: • Playgrounds: The Commission will assist with the selection of playgrounds to be replaced on an annual basis. • The attached en Space prioritized list shall be viewed proactively for parcels rated i~-i t o moderate. • Assistance from organization such as The Trust for Publ~ _ `.-lay ` - ` Al addressing en Space. • Undesignated to be used as cushion for increase in cost of proje- COMMISSION ACTT : A recommendation to the City Council concerning the Y 2000-2004 CIP for Parks is appropriate at this time. The Co i"ion arav choose to recommend the draft as presented or modify the document based on its discussion ..i he ily 19, i ()QQ nie. t.ing. `or plan CI for arks FY 2000-2004 2000 2001 North Park mitigation $150,000 North Park infrastructure 250,000 Patrick Eagan design 50,000 Holz Fa ma--- plan 20,000 Thomas Lake parking lot 25,000 Walnut Hill tr, `1 50,000 Grant property planning 15,000 Blackhawk l i lot' 50,000 Civic Arena floor 70,000 No view par'6 g lot g" z 50,000 1 asphalt rink 20,000 Lexington i ey lot lights 75,000 Goat Hill seating 40,000 Rahn rink lights 25,000 2 playgrounds 50,000 1 asphalt rink 20,000 Fish Lake $420,000 2 playgrounds 50.000 'Leary north $ 590,000 2002 2003 Soccer field lights $ 150,000 Camelian rink lights $ 25,000 3 playgrounds 75,000 Clearwater rink lights 25,000 $ 225,000 Captain Dodd sun shelter 25,000 Ridgecliff s shelter 25,000 2 playgrounds _JMOO $ 150,000 2004 Rahn south master plan $ 25,000 Northview tennis court lights 50,000 Carlson Lake dock 20,000 *The above amounts o nc,4 include 2 playgrounds 50 000 acquisition and small project set as Je $ 145,000 expenditures. -75 ACQUISITION/DEVELOr,,IENT SUB-COMMITTEE SITE REVIEW SUMMARY AC EST. A SITE USE CLASS. TYPE SECTION AC S DFSC[UPTI PRIORITY 1. Ohan Park Trail A * E/P SW/34 % AA ccess to count ark for S.E. corner EEi h 3. Patrick Eagan Trail A * E/P SE/22 Co letion of trail loo -west side Law 4. McCarthy site Trail A * P NE/22 6 Connection of ark to a N.W. trail High 7. Diamond T Trail A * E/P NE/SE/33 4 Connection to county ark High 8. Barbara Curry Lan rail A/C E/D NE/22 2 '/2 Connection to Patrick Eagan, land on north side ad'acent to Wescott - possible dedication Low 16. Mueller Fa Trail A E/P SE/14 '/2 Property on south side of pond to complete trail loo Low 20. West Publishing Trail E /13 1 '/2 Easement around pond Wescott Station Low 23. Section 27 Trail A * E /27 Easement over lots for trail Low 3 RN; MMM I= -m- IgNMEM -an NOW 6. Holz Farm Land/Trail B P NW/36 15 '/2 Expansion for programs and parking, trail connection to coun ark - 3 lots south of Cliff Hi h 8. Barbara Curry Lan rail A/C E/D NE/22 2 Connection to Patrick Eagan, land on north side Medium adjacent to Wescott - possible dedication to. 91!arry Park Land B * D/P SE/9 6 Park expansion to the east - possible dedication Low 11. Section 9 Land NE/SE/9 9 New park area, preservation/amphitheater - possible dedication Low R-COINUMITTEE OJT ' SUSITE REVIEW SUMMARY 'A EST. MAP # SITE U CLASS„ TYPE _ `1, Vf Rt;-S D St MPTi:d PRIORITY 12. LeMay LaLan B { P N" W 10 6 pansion, sou° <,dr M>at~s~i^:; :i High 14. Federal lii the, Land B D/P NE/16 10'/z :cess to existing 1 ' la ~d and/or expansion of 16 ViV1o T-3r 1 'lz 'c - ssible Jon Low 21. L: '-esidc P3rk Land B P "Y/SE 25 10 Park expansincr to open space and wet wrifi Medium i I 1 - low 2. Thomas 3,a1: irk La,;:l Ct~ E/P Sl '2 3 '1z Protection of shot elan oo(.s and views i h 5. Anderson Site Land C{*} D/P E/22 3'Iz Preservation, site of interpretive center - possible dedication Low 9, North Park Land C P _I ; SE 11 4 Lots along Borchert Lane as visible amenity, possible environmental concerns Low 13. Sk hill Park Land C * P NEW /16 7'Iz Park expansion to the east Medium 15. Section 15 Land C E SE/15 7 Visual corridor aloe Wescott reservation High 22. Section 27 Land C E NE/27 2'!, Acquisition/easement over tax forfeit property - reservation Low . OWN " _ ~ 17. Blue Crosse Land { ) CE - ~t17, ~ 80~ _ Presulvation, kid, ; v, . ~usal , lc3ium ~ Property L'W 16 18. Carriage Hills Golf Land D CE NW/14 120 Preservation, Right of u at High Course 19. Fish Lake Land * P S /15 9'% Preservation/Expansion 3 homes Medium 24. Parkview Golf Land D{*} CE N/34 80 Preservation Course High ti r w ACQUISITION/DEVELOr,,IENT SITE REVIEW SUMMARY CLASS ICATION AQQLJ1SLT1QN TYPE A - Trails -linkage P - Purchase B - Park expansion - activity based E - Easement C - Open space - preservation CE - Conservation Easement D - Other -Misc. D - Dedication Expansion of existing facility - contiguous New I:AMacquisition 134 I i To: APRC ra : Eagan Athletic Association Date: July 19, 1999 Dear Commissioners: For the past several months the Eagan Athletic Association (E AA) has been actively working a a plan for a facility to meet the owing pains of our association. The EAA board has defined and approved the project(s) that we feel will not only be a asset to E AA, but o entire community. Our youth athletic association is owing! With over 6,000- .L' es, 11,000+ participants, 2,000+ adult volunteers, 1 different spo' t programs, $250,000+ worth of sport equipment and $25,000+ worth of computer hardware, we need a place to centralize our daily operations. At your August meeting the Eagan Athletic Association will brine ca for your recommendations, our proposal for E,,,- -'s fixture ecreatic i 4 Community Center. If you have any questions, please feel free to call e at 651-452-7861. Thank you, an l er EA President