04/18/2005 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA
• Arbor Day Poster Judgin!,.
Monday, April 18, 2005 Conference Rooms 2 A
7:00 PM
Eagan Municipal Center
The Eagan Room
A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 pm
B. Approval of Agenda 7:02 pm
C. Presentations
(1) Volunteer Recognition- Lake Monitoring Program 7:03 pm
D. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005 7:10 pm
E. Visitors to be Heard 7:11 pm
F. Superintendent's Update and Department Happenings Pages 2 - 5 7:12 pm
(1) Recreation Report - Paula Nowariak Pages 6 - 9 7:20 pm
G. Consent Agenda 7:30 pm
(1) Arbor Day Proclamation Page 10
(2) Lake Appreciation Month Proclamation Page 11
H. Development Agenda 7:31 pm
1. Old Business 7:32 pm
(1) Nature's Point Update
J. New Business 7:33 pm
K. Water Resources Update 7:34 pm
L. Other Business and Reports 7:35 pm
M. Round Table 7:36 pm
N. Adjournment 7:40 pm
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities, and employment without
regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons wishing to participate are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance of the event. If a notice of less than 96
hours is received, the City will attempt to provide the aids.
en .j,
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
2004-2005 MEETING SCHEDULE
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
NAME 17 14 19 16 20 18 15 20 13* 14 14 18 16
Joseph Bari X X X X X X X X
Phil Belfiori x X 0* X 0* X 0* X X
Margo Danner x X x x x
Terry Davis x 0* X X x X X
N. Mark Filipi x X 0* X X X x 0* x
Duane Hansen x 0* X x X X
Muhammad Lodhi x X 0* X X X X
Elizabeth Perry x X x 0* 0 0 X 0
Dorothy Peterson x X X 0* X 0* X X
Richard Pletcher x X X X X X X 0* 0* X
X = present 0 = absent 0* = notified staff of absence prior to meeting
Recreation Sub-Committee Natural Resources Sub-Committee Acquisition/Development Sub-Committee
Terry Davis Mark Filipi Terry Davis
Joe Bari Phil Belfiori Dorothy Peterson
Richard Pletcher Muhammad Lodhi Joe Bari
Duane Hansen
Elizabeth Perry Margo Danner
Liaison to Holz Farm Study NE Eagan Study Master Plan - Large Group
Dorothy Peterson Richard Pletcher Mark Filipi
Elizabeth Perry Joe Bari
Margo Danner
Muhammed Lohdi
UPCOMING MEETINGS: OPEN ISSUES
Holz Farm NRHP Preliminary Evaluation
Parks Master Plan Review
Volunteer Recognition Methodology
PARK SYSTEM PLAN MEETINGS
• March 14 APrC Council Update
• April 12 Public Forum - Eagan Community Center
• May 10 APrC Council Workshop
• May 16 APrC Adoption of Plan
*Tentative dates - subject to change
VI Y PARKS CO M M 1 SSIO IN
2004-2005 FlEMBERS
JOSE~H Fv 1999 651-454-8442 (H) 5/2005
3033 Timberwood Trail (3 yr. 1999)
Eagan, MN 55121 (3 yr. 2002) ibaril@iuno.com
I L FI 0 R1 2002 651-905-0293 (H) 5/2006
3671 Canary Way (1yr. 2002) 763-287-7167 (W)
Eagan, MN 551 23 (3 yr, 2003) pbelfiori sbeng.com
2001 651/454-5688 (H) 5/2007
2037 Flint Lane (3 yr. 2001)
Eagan, MN 55122 (3 yr. 2004) mrsnagoo(a7usamiBy, net
TERRY DAVIS 1997 651-452-2635 (H) 5/2006
4895 Safari R?m (3 yr. 1997) 651-310-8941 (W)
Eagan, MN 55122-2690 (3 yr. 2000) 452-2152 (Home fax)
(3 yr. 2003) terry davipaul.oom
TS1y aoi.com (home)
N. MARK FIUPI May, 651-602-1725 (W) 5/2007
836 Overlook Place 1997 651-687-9866 (H)
Eagan, M N 55123 (3 yr. 1998) mark.fflipmetc.state.mn.us
(3 yr. 2001)
3 r. 2004
DUANEL HANSEN (alternate) May, 952-894-9228 (W) 5/2005
3911 Denmark Ave 2004 651-687-9566 (H)
Eagan, MN 55123 (1 yr. 2004) hand00rzcomcas.net
MUHAMMED I May, 952-278-2629 (W) 5/2007
4361 Bear Path Trail 2004 651-686-5273 (H)
Eagan, MN 55122 (3 yr. 2004) m iodhi(cDhotmail.com
B-IZABETH PERRY ( ) 2002 651-452-3201 (H) 5/2005
3298 Rolling Hills Drive (3 yr. 2002) 651-994-8808 (W)
Eagan, MN 55121 lperry64@hotmail.com
DOROTHY 2000 651-454-6532 (H) 5/2007
4337 Sequoia Drive (3 yr. 2000)
Eagan, MN 55122 (3 yr. 2004) nordc4337 junocom
RICHARD PLETCHER 2001 651-687-9177 (H) 5/2005
1074 Northview Park (1 yr. 2001)
Eagan, MN 55123 (3 yr. 2002) richard.letcherCa usarc-emh2.armmil
Eagan City Stw f E-M gel:
cmesko@ci.eaoan.mn.us polson@ci.eaaan.mn.us iasfahl@ci.eagan.mn.us
ghoveC ci.eagan.mn.us emacbeth@ci.eagan.mn.us
9-16-
Phone #651-675-5505 (Cherryl's # after 4:30 p.m.)
Eagan Parks and Recreation one Number. 651-675-5500
Eagan Parks and Recreation Staff E- ail
Administration:
C erryl Mesko c esko@ci.ea an. us
Paul Olson poison @ci.eagan. .us
Jeff Asfahl jasLahl@ci.eagan.mn.us
Forestry:
Gregg Hove ghove@ci.eagan.mn.us
Water Resources:
Eric Macbeth emacbeth@ci.eaaan.mn.us
Recreation Staff:
Paula Nowariak pnowariak@ci.eagan.mn.us
Sonya Rippe srjppe@ci.eagan.mn.us
Cathy Bolduc cbolduc@ci.eqqan.mn.us
Holly Champlin hchamplin@ci.eagan.mn.us
Colleen Callahan ccalahan@ci.eagan.mn.us
Cascade Bay:
Civic Arena:
Mark Vaughan mvaughan@ci.eagan.mn.us
Community Center:
Sandy Breuer sbreuer@ci.eagan.mn.us
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
FROM: PARKS AND RECREATION STAFF
DATE: APRH, 15, 2005
R
L EMINDER: A workshop has been set for 6:30 p.m. to review and judge the 2005 Arbor Day posters.
ITEM A: Call to order
ITEM Approval of agenda
ITEM C: Presentations
1. Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth will be recognizing volunteers who have
participated in the lake monitoring program.
ITEM Approval of minutes of March 14, 2005
ITEM E: Visitors to be Heard
ITEM F: Superintendent's Update and Department Happenings
Staff will review several items of interest to the Commission and community followed by a
recreation program update from Recreation Supervisor Paula Nowariak.
ITEM G: Consent Agenda
The following items can be covered with one motion.
1. The 2005 Arbor Day Proclamation is included in the packet. The Advisory Commission
should affirm the proclamation and recommend approval by the City Council.
2. The Lake Appreciation Month Proclamation is included in the packet for the Advisory
Commission to affirm and recommend approval by the City Council.
ITEM Development Proposals
There are no development proposals for the Commission to review.
ITEM 1: Old Business
1. Nature's Point was scheduled to be brought back to the Advisory Commission in April.
Staff will provide an update on the status of this proposal.
ITEM J: New Business
There are no New Business items for the Commission to review.
ITEM K: Water Resources Update
Water Resources Coordinator Macbeth will briefly provide any additional information relative
to the Water Resources division.
ITEM L: Other Business and Reports
There are no items for Commission discussion.
ITEM M: Round Table
Any items of concern that might be placed on upcoming agendas or items of interest will be
identified.
ITEM N: Adjournment
I\Parks and Recreation\Advisory Commission\Monthly Meetings\April 2004\Cover
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
April 2005
Recreation Division
• Softball schedules are almost complete. There are currently 201 teams registered for softball 6
nights a week. There are 36 teams participating in the Two Game Tune-Up on Saturday, April 23
at Northview Athletic. The season is starting one week later this year.
• Co-Rec Sand Volleyball teams are currently registering for the summer season which begins mid-
May.
• Concessions staff are on board for the upcoming season. There are 17 staff hired for this season.
Northview opens on Saturday, April 23 and the Trailer on Thursday, April 28.
Parks Division
• Water Resources Technician Jim Storland represented the City at the March 30-31 Shallow Lakes
Conference sponsored by the MN Lakes Association, MN Department of Natural Resources, MN
Pollution Control Agency, MN Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, MN Board of Water
and Soil Resources, and Ducks Unlimited. The meeting brought together diverse interests to
discuss protection and management actions that balance the needs and interests of people and
wildlife.
• The Minnesota Legislature is considering a proposal that would establish a 10-year plan to clean
up polluted lakes, rivers and streams and keep "clean waters clean" (i.e., Clean Water Legacy
Bill, SF 762 HF 826). This new statewide effort would support testing all Minnesota surface
waters, begin to clean up polluted rivers and lakes, and invest in protecting the clean waters of
our state.
• Eagan's national reputation for water quality management is again being recognized. Water
Resources Coordinator Eric Macbeth has been invited to represent the City as a guest speaker at
the 18th Annual National Conference on Enhancing the States' Lake Management. Programs April
26-29 in Chicago. Macbeth's presentation, "Managing for long term lake quality in a suburban
setting," will be part of the opening plenary session, "Planning for better urban lakes."
• The grant proposal for improvements to Thresher Fields was submitted to the DNR Outdoor
Recreation Grant Program for review. The level of funding available for grants has yet to be
determined by the Legislature though indications are that it may remain at last sessions, level or be
reduced. Either way, the competition for the available funds is very keen. Notifications are not
expected until mid-summer, work would not begin until 2006.
• The closing on the Caponi property took place in late March. Only the filing of documents, deeds
etc remains to be completed. The City now has ownership of two parcels (NE 10 and S 20) of
additional greenspace, totaling 30 acres. The Caponi Art Park Board (CAP) will have ownership
of the remaining 30 acres. Funding for the 30 acres of City property was derived from several
sources;
1. City of Eagan/ Park Site Fund = $720,000
2. Dakota County/Open Space Grant = $850,000
3. DNR/Natural and Scenic Grant = $200,000
4. D emediation Grant = $300,000
5. TPL/DNR/ Metro Corridors Grant = $191,000
Total for City 30 acres = $2,261,000 ($75,400 @ acre)
• Park staff have completed the sweeping of over 100 miles of boulevard and park trails. The
process generally takes 4-5 staff approximately 2 weeks. The sand is swept onto the grass
boulevard where it is swept onto the street and picked up by the County and/or City depending
upon the location. Residents are asked not to blow or sweep sand and debris into the streets or on
to trails where it eventually ends up in the stormwater system.
• The spring brings many calls from groups and individuals wanting to volunteer for a community
service project. The most pressing need is for a "spring cleaning " of park areas, ie; trash and
litter pick up and removal. The City will provide bags and also pick up and remove what is
collecting. Arrangements can be made by contacting Paul Graham, Park Operations Supervisor at
651-675-5300. We are very flexible with days, times and locations-every little bit helps !
• This is the year for the now "bi-annual, Eagan tree sale". The event will be held Saturday April
30 and the Maintenance Facility on Coachman Road. Most materials have already been sold
however "extras" are sold on first come basis, generally later in the morning. All materials are
bare root stock-there is no warranty once it leaves the site.
• This years Arbor Day celebration is scheduled for Saturday May 14, beginning around 9:00 AM,
at the Lexington-Diffley Fields. The planting will take place along the new public road located on
the north side of the park near the water reservoir. Groups or individuals wanting to
participate,including APrC members!, can call Gregg Hove, Supervisor of Forestry, at 651-756-
5300 for further information.
• Tennis players rejoice-the nets are up!
• With the spring rains and warmth, our golden friends, the dandelions, will soon be back. Because
dandelions are not considered a "noxious weed"(obnoxious-perhaps) there are no specific
requirements for their control. The City limits its control efforts primarily to specific areas where
the dandelions may hinder an activity (sports fields etc) or those associated with public buildings.
Instead of relying upon the system wide use of pesticides, the City prefers to foster thick turf
which will help minimize dandelion germination. Any areas that are treated will be signed near
the points of entry-once dry, the area is considered useable-generally takes a few minutes.
Dandelions are an annual and will disappear before summer--- new plants appearing in the fall
(best time to treat).
• More turf talk-park staff will soon begin the fertilization of park areas. Again this year, the City
will use a high quality, slow release product, with no phosphorus, except at those site shown to
have a phosphorus deficiency. One of the primary goals of the fertilization program is to promote
lush turf, which helps crowd out weeds, minimizing the need for pesticides. The use of the high
quality products has allowed the City to reduce the annual applications at non-irrigated sites from
3 to 2.
• Park staff has begun the process of preparing athletic field for spring and summer use. Nearly 45
soccer fields of varying dimensions and 65 ball field infields will be needed to meet the demand.
The popularity of lacrosse is also placing pressure on the available field space.
• Thresher Fields will be scheduled for use (soccer) for the first time beginning this spring. The
field space will allow for the creation of some new fields and also serve as the alternate site when
existing fields are being rested.
• The soccer fields at Quarry, Bridle Ridge and Mueller Farm Parks will be rested and reseeded this
spring. The turf has become worn and thin from on-going use. Thresher Fields (see above) will be
the alternate site.
• Park staff have nearly completed the renovation of the exterior of the Moonshine Retreat Center,
including the installation of several new windows. The original siding was nearly 40 years old.
• The program of making rental space available for canoes has been expanded to new locations.
Racks will be located at Blackhawk, Thomas and Bur Oaks parks. The resident cost for the
season, May to October, is $40. The renter must provide their own cable and lock. Slots can be
reserved by calling 651-675-5500.
• With the improving weather has come a rash of senseless vandalism, some of it very costly.
Recently a number of permanent benches have been burned and graffiti has been spray painted on
building walls, play equipment and parking lots. Staff has been in contact with the Police
Department and is also exploring other means of protecting the community investment in its park
system. Residents who are witness to vandalism occurring, or are suspicious of activity in a park,
are encouraged to contact the PD immediately-you can remain anonymous. Damage can be
reported to the Park Maintenance Department at 651-675-5300.
J
• The Forestry staff has conducted controlled burns of native grass prairies at several park sites
including Wescott Station and Thomas Lake. The burns are a method by which invasive and none
native species can be controlled or eliminated. Following a burn, the prairie areas will appear
blackened and lifeless, however, within only a couple of weeks, they will spring back to life.
• Again this year, the Forestry Division will conduct the popular resident Buckthorn removal
program. Residents and neighborhood groups can volunteer to take part in the program and
remove Buckthorn from private property by a following few simple steps;
1. Contact the City Tree Inspector to arrange for a site visit to verify the presence of
Buckthorn
2. Schedule a day to remove the Buckthorn, alerting the City
3. City staff will pickup the buckthorn piles from a predetermined location-generally a
front boulevard accessible to a truck.
The pickups take place only on Mondays. For further information or to schedule a site visit
residents can contact the Tree Inspector at 651-675-5300. The Tree Inspector will be available as
of April
Community Center
• As a follow up to the 2005 Children's Expo in February, there have been 21 coupons redeemed
for The Blast. There was also a letter and packet sent to those attendees interested in birthday
parties at The Blast.
• Our spring break $5 BOG day was successful - 20 pre-registered and 2 walk-ins.
• The concession stand was open more hours during spring break and did see an increase in daily
sales.
• We hosted the first ever egg hunt in The Blast in March. It was in conjunction with a preschool
program held in Kids Kare.
• In Mid-March we held our first Wedding Workshop. We had ten vendors participate and about
40 attendees.
• There were 37 birthday parties in The Blast in March.
• On April 2nd the third Mothers of Multiples sale was held in the gymnasium. It's a popular event
that brought over 1000 people into the building.
• On April 6th the Community Center hosted the City of Eagan's All Employee Meetings.
• On Friday April 8th, Thomas Lake Elementary school held an overnight party for 5d' graders at the
Community Center.
• 76 Personal Training sessions were sold during the month of March 2005 as compared to 43 in
March of 2004.
• At the end of March there were 229 members with the Health Partners plan. This plan reimburses
qualifying members $20.00 per month. This program began last July and has become an
excellent member retention program.
• Throughout the month of March we promoted healthy eating and provided nutritional education
to coincide with National Nutrition Month.
• Danny Glassic, a Fitness Attendant, joined our team and is working part-time evenings and
weekends
• April 7t - April 20th, we are asking members to fill out a member satisfaction survey to give us
their feedback. This is our first effort with surveying our fitness members.
• We completed a three day project of completely stripping, waxing and buffing of the vet flooring
in the three meeting rooms.
• On April 21St the Eagan Foundation will host their annual wine and cheese fundraiser at the
Community Center, for the third year in a row.
Looking ahead to summer:
• Planning is underway for our upcoming 90 Day Spectacular (Summer Membership Special)
which will start in May.
• There are currently 20 youth groups scheduled for field trips to the Blast Indoor Playground from
May to August, equaling about 900 kids.
• We completed a three day project of completely stripping, waxing and buffing of the vct flooring
in the three meeting rooms.
• On April 21St the Eagan Foundation will host their annual wine and cheese fundraiser at the
Community Center, for the third year in a row.
Looking ahead to summer:
• Planning is underway for our upcoming 90 Day Spectacular (Summer Membership Special)
which will start in May.
• There are currently 20 youth groups scheduled for field trips to the Blast Indoor Playground from
May to August, equaling about 900 kids.
57
mm~
Date: April 4, 2005
Agenda Item: F-l; Recreation Update
Actooo
+ City of Eagan Information x
Parks and Recreation MEMO 1, Attachments
AGENDA IT : QUARTERLY RECREATION DIVISION REPORT
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: RECREATION SUPERVISORY STAFF
ITE OVERVIEW: An update of recreation programs activity for Winter 2004-05.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
The Recreation staff has been meeting with the APrC programming sub committee to share ideas, discuss
programming and receive direction from the commission. As a result of these meetings, stakeholders have
discussed capital improvement considerations and received great ideas for programming and commission
report presentations. This report is a culmination of all of the program areas including preschool, youth,
teens, adult sports, seniors, family, and community events.
Adult Sports
• Winter Snorts Leagues had 141 teams participating in basketball, boot hockey, broomball
and volleyball with over 1,200 participants for the season. Digging Lips from the Men's
Volleyball league took the Championship of the MRPA Men's C Volleyball State
Tournament in March.
? Mother Nature gave us quite a variety of weather, going from -30 degree
windchill to 6-8 inches of snow and then 50 degrees. Throughout this, only
a few cancellations had to be made.
• S ring Snorts
? Summer softball currently has 201 teams registered, Spring basketball is
full with 8 teams, Volleyball has 7 teams in both the Women's league and
Co-ed Beginning league.
• What's Coming Up
? Two Game Tune-up for adult softball teams is being held on Saturday,
April 23 at Northview Athletic Fields.
? Summer softball leagues begin on Monday, April 25.
Community Events
• Snow Daze: People were in a daze on Saturday, February 5 at Trapp Farm Park. Though
there was no snow for tubing, participants were still able to enjoy the dog sled rides and ice
fishing. They also received a coupon to visit the tubing hill in the future at no charge.
• Daddy's Little Sweetheart Dance - Forty little girls and their daddy's got all dressed up
for an elegant evening in the Oaks of the Eagan Community Center to pre-celebrate the
Valentine's holiday. Photos, dancing, cookie decorating and picture frame crafts were the
main highlights for the very successful first-time event.
• Holz Farm - Old Fashioned Holiday: This great annual event provided in partnership
with the Friends of the Farm offered the opportunity to experience "holiday - time on the
farm" as it would have occurred during the 1940's. The event welcomed over 300 visitors
who enjoyed hay rides, live caroling provided by the Eagan Men's Chorus and the Eagan
Women of Note, holiday music provided by the "Moen-Weeds", cookie baking and
sampling, tree trimming activities, complimentary hot co-co, a bonfire, and a surprise visit
by Santa.
• Family Skating Extravaganza: This inaugural event provided in partnership by the Eagan
Community Center, Eagan Parks and Recreation, the Eagan Skating School and the Eagan
Ice Crystal Figure Skating Club provided an afternoon of skating exhibitions and instruction
for everyone to enjoy! The weather was spectacular and the event was a success. Much
enthusiasm was shared, hoping this event can become a great tradition.
• What's Coming Up
? Eagan Fun Run - Saturday, May 21 - This year Commons on Marice is helping
sponsor the event by coordinating booths of local organizations with tips and
health services, entertainment and an additional mailing for the event. The
Fitness Walk will be included for the second year with an emphasis on getting
seniors out prior to the National Senior Health and Fitness Day on Wednesday,
May 25.
Preschool
• Classes- The winter session ran from January 3-March 11. Classes are offered at Bridle
Ridge, Goat Hill, Rahn, Skyhill and the Community Center. There were 292 children
signed up in 25 different class sections.
• Preschool Dance - Preschool Dance was offered at the Community Center this past winter.
The class was a huge success; the children were thrilled to perform each week in the
performance studio like real ballerinas do!
• Musical Wednesdays - Musical Wednesdays was offered and went out with a "bang" at the
last class. Parents came to watch the progress that their budding stars made on instruments,
rhythm and conducting!
• Childrens Museum Field Trip - In February, 56 children with parent chaperones rode a
bus to the Children's Museum in St. Paul. The children and parents had a great time riding
the bus and touring the museum together
• What Coming Up
? A variety of classes and activities for the Summer of 2005.
Seniors
• Santa Visit - The Eagan Seniors hosted another successful event on Saturday, December 4.
More than 50 kids along with their families visited with Santa in the Lone Oak Room for a
photo and cookies. Santa also took a few minutes to visit with a preschool program during
the same time. The Eagan Seniors had a great time and plan to host the event again in 2005.
• What's Co °ng U-
? Keep your eyes peeled for information on the 2d Annual Antique Assessment
Show on Saturday, April 23 in the Lone Oak Room. This event is open to
everyone!
? Parks and Recreation is hosting the 2d Anniversary Party for the Lone Oak
Room on Tuesday, May 17 from 5:00 - 7:00 pm in the Lone Oak Room. This
year the whole family is invited for a couple hours of games, fun and
entertainment in a picnic-like setting.
7
Teens
• ring the Noise - Silence the Violence. Students from the School of Environmental
Studies capitalized on our Bring the Noise program. They coordinated four bands and an
open mic evening to raise funds for Kids N Kinship in honor of a friend who was tragically
killed. Over 400 people, mostly youth, attended or were involved in performing for this
event. Over $1300 was raised.
• The Oasis/Special Activities - Regular daily attendance continues to fluctuate. However
the special events programs attendance has been increasing. Club Oasis for Middle School
dance has an average of 70 youth attending. Our most recent Bring the Noise this February
presented "Cryptic" and over 85, 17+ youth attended. Second season of Dodgeball
continues to be a huge hit over 100 middle and high school students are registered. We
opened in the fall of 2003, the attendance from that date through the end of December 2004
our total attendance was approximately 3000. For the first three months of 2005 our
attendance is already over 1000. This is in large part due to our special events, and does not
include the youth registered for dodgeball. We continue to reach out to the schools with
weekly e-mails and lunch time visits where possible.
• Eagan Teen Advisory Board fE=T 1- The board has been spending time with
professionals in the industry obtaining guidance and support for developing their business
plan for a coffee / beverage bar addition to the teen center. They have participated in a teen
focus group for the Park Master Plan 20/20 process and have been busy distributing surveys
to gain feedback from their peers on the teen center, coffee bar concept and insights for the
20/20 plan. 145 surveys have already been collected.
• What's Co ng Up
? Summer programs including the Third annual Battle of the Band Series, the
Film Festival, 3rd annual Wheel Jam and the development of a teen center
commercial.
Winter Facilities
• Trapp Farm Park
? Trapp Farm was open from Jan. 22-30. It was then closed for 20 days and
reopened on Feb. 20 and closed for the season on March 3.
? Total number of days open was 20 V2.
? Total attendance was 2,768. Over 1200 less than last year when it was open for
39 days.
• Skating Sites
? There were six Class A and 2 Class B skating sites that were staffed and
maintained for the winter skating season. The scheduled opening date was
Saturday, December 18, but due to the weather, the first site opened on
December 23. All sites were opened by December 28.
Attendance-
Total approximate attendance was 12, 611 visitors. Depending on the location,
the A sites were open from 31-45 days with total attendance of approximately
12,096. The B sites were open for 31 days with a total attendance of
approximately 515.
Weather:
? There was some interesting weather this year, with 50 degrees and sleet,
thunder and lighting during the New Years weekend. Sites had to close early
on some of those days due to the crazy weather.
? There were three days that the rinks were closed due to dangerous windchills
and one day that sites were closed because of a snow storm. The month of
February began by closing for 6 days due to warm temperatures.
? The maintenance crew should be commended for recovering the rinks more
than once during this season.
Youth and Family
• Adapted Basketball - Youth ages six to thirteen participated in an eight week basketball
program, adapted for youth with disabilities. More than 23 kids played hard, developed
basketball skills, and cheered on their teammates throughout the program.
• Preschool Gymnastics-In cooperation with ISD 196 Community Education, this program
began in February. It is held on Monday-Wednesday mornings at the ECC. Due to popular
demand, a spring session was also added.
• The Blast and Open G (BOG) Days - 5 Buck BOG Days continued over the winter
and spring breaks. Participation was steady. The biggest attendance day was 40. A 5
Buck BOG Day is a supervised play day for ages 6 - 12. Recreation Leaders supervise
the play in a fun and active afternoon of dodgeball, sports, games, and play in the Blast.
3 Buck BOG Days are also held on various days off from school. The 3 Buck days are
not supervised.
• Trips-
? A trip to Sesame Street Live was a big hit for a group of preschoolers and
their parents. This trip was jointly offered with Rosemount and Inver
Grove Parks & Recreation Departments
? Spring Break trips were very popular this year for the first time in more
than 3 years. Eagan partnered with Farmington and Rosemount Parks &
Recreation Department to offer 3 events. Grand Rios Water Park,
Richardson Nature Center/Chuck E. Cheese and a Kids Activity Day at the
Rosemount Community Center were enjoyed by over 200 kids.
• Youth Development -96 students registered for our winter quarters after school recreate
programs at Glacier and Pilot Knob. Eagan Parks and Recreation program offerings
included; basketball, floor hockey/basketball combo, sketching with the art house, sewing
and homework help. We are entering our last quarter/session at both of these schools this
spring.
• What's Coming Up
? Check out the Discover Brochure for a huge listing of golf and tennis programs
for youth to adult, including the new adapted and pee wee tennis programs
? A new summer program called "Recess". Including 7 neighborhood sites, 8
weeks of programming and 8 fieldtrips. Discovering our self and our place in
this community.
? Summer in the Park, Camps, T-ball, Eaganettes,
We are very excited for spring and summer. Residents are encouraged to Come Out and Play in
Eagan!
Date: April 19, 2005
Agenda Item: G-1; Arbor Day Proclamation
Action X
City of Eagan Information
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X !,Invitation
,Council Resolution
AGENDA ITEM: ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: GREGG HOVE, SUPERVISOR OF FORESTRY
ITEM OVERVIEW: Acknowledge the Arbor Day Resolution setting Saturday, May 14 as Arbor Day and
May as Arbor Month in the City of Eagan
BACIZ4GRGUND/111STGAY:
• Eagan has received the Tree City USA community designation from the National Arbor
Day Foundation for the sixteenth consecutive year. Each year the Parks and Recreation
Department conducts an Arbor Day program which includes participation in a tree
planting project. This year the 19th annual event will be held at Lexington-Diffley
Athletic Fields.
• Recognition as a Tree City is based on efforts by the City to promote tree planting in the
community and the resolution demonstrates that effort.
• To become a Tree City, a community must meet four standards: a tree board or
department, a tree care ordinance, a comprehensive community forestry program, and an
Arbor Day observance.
• Eagan has demonstrated progress in the following forestry activities: Publications, parks
and open space, and improved ordinance.
• Receiving these awards acknowledges the City's efforts to minimize environmental
impact during developments, and adhere to policies such as "Forever Green," aimed to
maintain and enhance Eagan's trees and foliage.
Scheduled Arbor Day activities include:
9:00 -9:30 Welcome, social hour, refreshments
9:30 - 10:30 Walking tours, demonstrations, information tables, ask the tree doctor
10:30-12:00 Arbor Day landscape installation
12:00 Brief Arbor Day program
12:30 Picnic lunch served by city dignitaries, staff and volunteers
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. Acknowledge the resolution setting May 14, 2005 as Arbor day and May as Arbor Month in
the City of Eagan.
2. Other
Item: I 1 Arl5ar
Attachment: I • `
Cot of Eakan
19th ANNUAL ARBOR DAY CELEBRATION
TO BE HELD AT
LEXINGTON-DIFFLEY ATHLETIC FIELDS
SAT AY - May 1 , 2 5
Dear Resident,
Celebrate Arbor Day!
You are invited to join with the City of Eagan as we celebrate Arbor Day on
Saturday, May 14th, 2005 at Lexington-Diffley Athletic Fields. (Enter from the
north entrance off Diffley Road). Arbor Day has been celebrated in Eagan since
1987, and was established nationally to emphasize the importance of trees and
community reforestation.
Scheduled activities include:
9:00-9:30 Welcome, social hour, refreshments
9:30-10:30 Walking Tours, Demonstrations, Information Tables, Ask the Tree Doctor
10:30-12:00 Arbor Day landscape installation
12:00
Brief Arbor Day Program
Introduction of 2005 Arbor Day poster artist - Wyatt Huso, Thomas Lake Elementary
Announcement of 2006 Arbor Day poster contest winner.
12:30
Picnic lunch served by city dignitaries, staff and volunteers
For further information or to volunteer for planting, please contact the Parks
Maintenance office at (651) 675-5300. It is requested that you register for this event so
we can ensure sufficient amounts of food for the picnic lunch. Thank you.
Paul Olson Gregg Hove
Superintendent of Parks Supervisor of Forestry
See you there!
P tarbor day/arbor day inufte2005
Item: -1 i rc
CITY OF EAGAN Attachment:_. +tctt ~o~u4i
RESOLUTION
A PROCLAMATION OF EAGAN ARBOR DAY
AND EAGAN ARBOR MONTH
WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource in the State of Minnesota and City of
Eagan - purifying our air and water, helping conserve our soil, serving as a recreational settings,
providing habitat for wildlife for all kinds, and enriching our lives in so many important ways;
and
WHEREAS, pollutants, tree diseases and urban expansion have damaged and continue to
threaten our trees, creating the need for reforestation programs and concerted public action
toward ensuring the future of out City's urban forests; and
WHEREAS, each year the people of Minnesota pay special attention to the wonderful
gift that our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our state's trees;
and
WHEREAS, The City of Eagan has been recognized as a Tree City USA community by
the National Arbor Day Foundation since 1988 and desires to continue its tree-planting programs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council does hereby
proclaim Saturday, May 14, 2005 to be ARBOR DAY and the month of May, 2005 to be
ARBOR MONTH in the City of Eagan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council further urge citizens to
become more aware of the importance of trees to the well-being of our community; and to
participate in City tree planting programs which will ensure a greener place for our citizens to live
in the decades to come.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, Maria Petersen, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this I9t'' day of
April, 2005.
Maria Petersen, City Clerk
Date: April 18, 2005
Agenda Item: G-2; Lake Appreciation Month
Action X
City of Eagan Information 7-1
Parks and Recreation MEMO Attachments X t Council resolution, draft
AGENDA IT : Lakes Appreciation Month Proclamation
TO: ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
PREPARED BY: Eric Macbeth, Water Resources Coordinator
ITE : The APrC is asked to recommend the City Council adopt a resolution
designating June Eagan Lakes Appreciation Month.
LAC OU STO Y:
The Lakes Appreciation Proclamation highlights the values and opportunities of lakes in the
City. It provides a "theme" for community pride. Attached is the draft proclamation that
would be reviewed by City Council.
DISCUSSION/EVALUATION:
In addition to encouraging new activities that focus on lakes in June, the proposed
proclamation is already supported by the following lake activities:
• June: Sunfish spawning, turtles nesting
• June 4: Eagan Parks and Recreation Youth Fishing Clinic (ages 9-13) at Blackhawk Lake
• June 6-10 and June 20-24: City monitors long-term lake water quality
• June 15 - August 31: ongoing City lakeweed harvesting program
• June 15: City showcases lake water quality program to other Metro Area cities
• June 15: Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization meeting
• June 15: Fish Lake Neighbors discuss forming lake association
• June 21 (tentative): Moonshine Park Shoreline Habitat Project dedication
• June 25 - July 17: Great North American Secchi Dip-In (volunteer water clarity
monitoring)
ALTERNATIVES FOR APrC CONSIDERATION
1. Recommend the City Council approve signature for the Eagan Lakes Appreciation Month
proclamation.
2. Other.
tiw
CITY OF EAGAN I Item: &-z; L&4 `pprecr
EAGAN LAKES APPRECIATION
June 2005 Attachment: I • Dr }
~a1 x.
WHEREAS, Eagan has more than 350 lakes and ponds; and
WHEREAS, Eagan residents and visitors derive numerous recreational opportunities to
canoe, fish, and swim in these lakes; and
WHEREAS, still others enjoy walking and observing wildlife near these water bodies; and
WHEREAS, City residents play an essential role in protecting lakes' aquatic habitat and
recreational value by keeping fertilizers, grass clippings and leaves, and other household pollutants
from entering storm drains that connect to these lakes; and
WHEREAS, in 1990 the Eagan City Council adopted a surface water quality management
plan, making it one of the first Minnesota cities to do so; and
WHEREAS, Eagan's water quality management program has been nationally recognized;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is producing a State of the Lakes report for citizens
regarding its seven Class I lakes; and
WHEREAS, the North American Lake Management Society is urging localities nationwide
to declare a Lakes Appreciation Month this summer; and
WHEREAS, Eagan's Water Resource staff has deemed June to be a favorable month to
hold such an observance; and
WHEREAS, an Eagan Lakes Appreciation Month would be a good time to encourage
residents or businesses to hold clean-up days at their nearest water body; and
WHEREAS, the City's Advisory Parks Commission and the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Organization both endorse this proclamation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council hereby proclaims
June 2005 as Eagan Lakes Appreciation Month and urges residents to do all they can to keep Eagan
lakes clean by keeping fertilizers out of storm sewers, by picking up nearby trash, and by protecting
these treasured water resources.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, Maria Petersen, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this _ day of 2005.
Maria Petersen, City Clerk
ADVISORY PARKS COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING MARCH 14, 2005
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on March 14, 2005
with the following Commission Members present: Joe Bari, Phil Belfiori, Margo Danner, Terry Davis,
Mark Filipi, Duane Hansen, Muhammad Lodhi, Dorothy Peterson and Richard Pletcher. Member Perry
was not present. Staff included Jeff Asfahl, Supervisor of Recreation; Eric Macbeth, Water Resources;
Gregg Hove, City Forester; C.J. Lilly, City Landscape Architect and Park Planner; Sheila Cartney, City
Planner; City Attorney, Bob Bauer; Cherryl Mesko, Administrative Coordinator and Lori Kimball,
Recording Secretary.
Member Filipi moved, Member Peterson seconded with all present members voting in favor to accept the
agenda as amended moving Department Happenings to occur just prior to Round Table. All attending
members voted to approve the agenda as amended.
APPROVAL
Member Peterson moved and Member Lodhi seconded with all present members voting to approve the
minutes of February 14 as amended. The change will occur in paragraph 2 under Water Resources
Update. Member Peterson asked for information on the JP-47 status, not J-9.
20/20 PARKS VISION UPDATE
Bill Bechner updated the APrC by discussing use of the term "open space". Community open space in
Eagan is 72 acres to 1000 residents. The list of proposed terms is Neighborhood Park, Community
Athletic Park, Preserve, Greenway Preserve (used with a trail), Greenway Corridor, Cultural/Historical
sites and Special Use Sites. Bechner cited that Eagan has more acres per resident than the current
standard tends to be.
Bechner shared a vision to develop an interconnected system of trails around the City. These trails will
be city wide, provide an access and emphasize the feeling of connection and continuity. The trails would
also provide variety and balance of both transportation and recreation. Bechner said the existing trail
would be shared use paths; bike lanes would be along the side of the road and trail signage would be
shared with the bike lane.
Bechner said an effort for reclamation of Thresher Park's south west corner would consist of planting
native grasses to provide a natural resource to cleanse the soil. This area has been abused for many years.
The reclamation effort will be a long term community and educational partnership that can be worked on
by Scout groups and school groups. Chair Davis asked Bechner if there was concern of what may be in
the soil on this site. Bechner said there were no toxic chemicals to be concerned about; the debris that
was left there was construction debris like concrete block and other non-toxic items.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 2
The 20/20 surveys are still available for residents to complete. After responses have been received in
April, more specific options will be discussed. April 14th is the next public forum. Bechner said the
turnout at the February form was 38 people, which resulted in a lively discussion. Member Danner
reminded the viewer that on the back page of the new Discover Parks and Recreation brochure is one of
the surveys. The website also contains the survey and the phone number to call.
0.i HAPPENI
Superintendent of Recreation, Jeff Asfahl, informed the APrC of Department happenings for Recreation,
Parks and Community Center.
• Summer Softball, Spring Basketball and volleyball registration for returning teams was February 28-
March 4 with new teams registering March 7-11 or until leagues is full. There are currently 173
teams registered for the spring/summer season.
Eagan Seniors are working on several programs for the upcoming season: the 2°dAnnual Antique
Assessment show on Saturday, April 23 is open to the public and a bingo tent for the July 4th
celebration.
• May 21 is the date of the 20th Annual Eagan Fun Run. This year the Commons on Marice is also
taking party by bringing in vendors with health tips and services. It will also be a great lead-in
activity to national Senior Health and Fitness Day on Wednesday, May 25th.
The Trapp Farm tubing Hill will officially close for the season on March 13. The hill has not been
open since March 3 due to lack of snow. So far the hill has only been open 20 '/z days.
• The Eagan Art Festival will take place June 25-26 on the grounds at Central Park. This event is
organized and sponsored by the Eagan Art House. They expect over 100 artisans to take part!
The July 4th Fun Fest Committee is working towards this year's event, which has been themed as
"Star Spangled Spectacular". The event will again take place on the festival grounds located at
Central Park.
This year's Arbor Day event will be held Saturday, May 14th on the north side of the Lexington-
Diffley complex. Groups interested in taking part should contact Gregg Hove at 675-5300.
Community groups wanting to volunteer time to clean up a favorite park can contact Paul Graham,
Park Operations Supervisor, at 675-5300.
The numbers of personal training sessions have increased at the Eagan Community Center. The
Daddy's Little Sweetheart Dance brought 72 dads and daughters to the Community Center and
wedding workshop was held in March. The Community Center is now a gathering place for all ages,
not just seniors or Teens.
C ONS T1T AG
Nl Y ADD-ITiON
Tom Kennealy, for the Estate of Joseph Kennealy, is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision of
2.0 acres to create three lots and a Variance to the required structure set back from a public right-of-way,
on property located at 2115 Silver Bell Road, in the SE'/4 of Section 18.
Alternatives for Commission Consideration:
The Development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication.
The development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 3
An individual lot tree preservation plan will be required at the time of building permit application.
A cash dedication in lieu of on-site water quality ponding should be required for this
development.
Member Danner moved and Member Filipi seconded, with all present members voting in favor to approve
the Preliminary Subdivision, parks dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and
wetlands issues that pertain to the Kennealy addition.
STEEPLECHASE OF EAGAN
City Planner Sheila Cartney, provided background for the Steeplechase of Eagan Development. The
APrC was asked to review the park dedication, trails dedication, tree preservation, water quality and
wetlands issues that pertain to the Steeplechase of Eagan development. The applicant, Toll Brothers, is
requesting approval for Rezoning from Agriculture to PD (Planned Development): a Preliminary
Subdivision (Steeplechase of Eagan) to create 56 lots and a Preliminary Planned Development to create
37 single family units and 58 town home units for property located at 4889 Pilot Knob Road (former
Diamond T Ranch site) in the SE 1/4 of Section 33.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommended this approval at a July 19, 2004 meeting
after reviewing a similar proposal that included 36 single family units and 73 town home units on 112
lots. The Advisory Planning Commission (APC) recommended approval at the July 27, 2004 meeting.
City Council, at their August 17, 2004 meeting, directed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW) be prepared. At their January 4, 2005 meeting, Council accepted the EAW as presented and
declared an EIS is not necessary; the item was continued to the February 1, 2005 meeting. At their
February 1, 2005 meeting, Council approved the wetland exemption as presented and the wetland
boundary/type. The APrC directed the applicant to return to the March 14, 2005 meeting.
During the past thirteen months the city has received many letters in opposition of extending Wellington
Way for development of the Diamond T Ranch. Residents opined concerns and suggestions, such as
desiring a trail connection from the surrounding neighbors to the County Park and concern about previous
dumping on the property and the build up of horse manure. Others are concerned with ponding and water
drainage
The applicant requests to rezone from Agriculture to Planned Development with the Planned
Development zoning district is as follows:
1. Provide greater flexibility in environmental design and relaxation of strict application of the
zoning ordinance in exchange for greater creativity and environmental sensitivity.
2. Recognize the economic and cultural advantages that will accrue to the residents of a planned
community.
3. Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to land use.
4. Encourage the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, natural features,
and open space.
5. Encourage a development pattern that is consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
in regards to land use density, transportation facilities and community facilities.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 4
The APC and City Council will review these criteria. This item is scheduled for a public hearing in front
of the APC on March 22, 2005 and is scheduled for the April 5, 2005 City Council meeting.
Tree Preservation
Gregg Hove, City Forester, discussed tree preservation for the Steeplechase Development. A tree
inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are seven-hundred fifty-four (754)
significant trees in the inventory for the entire site (detached home area plus attached home area). The
results of a tree inventory by a consulting company are as follows, with the balance of the tree inventory
is comprised of cottonwood, aspen, crabapple, pine, and willow.
Species Count % of Total
Oak 474 63%
Box elder 78 10%
B Cherry 106 14%
Elm 28 4%
Hove stated that development as proposed will result in the removal of a total of five-hundred forty-eight
(548) significant trees (72.7 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance
allowable tree removal for this development proposal will be calculated based upon the specific use of
different parts of the site. The northern third of the site will have single-family detached homes;
allowable removal for this area is set at 40%. The southern two-thirds of the site will have single-family
attached (multi-family residences); allowable removal for this area is set at 47.5%. The table below
shows proposed tree removals.
Detached Units Attached Units
Allowable Removal 40% 47.5%
Existing Trees 176 578
Proposed Removal 134 (76.1%) 412 (71.3%)
Required Mitigation 148 386
(Category B trees)
With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, a required tree mitigation for this proposal
calculated at five-hundred thirty-four (534) Category B trees.
Hove stated that the applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation Plan indicating the fulfillment of required
tree mitigation through the installation of 426 Category B trees and 56 Category A trees, for a total
equivalent of 538 Category B trees. Hove said this is slightly over what city ordinance allows.
Hove stated that, after several meetings with the applicant, staff recommends that overall required tree
mitigation be handled on a "floating number" system, where additional trees preserved will reduce the
final mitigation number, and additional trees removed will increase the final mitigation number. This
system has been used with satisfactory results on past large development sites.
Staff recommends this approach to mitigation because of the massive linear footage of grade limits. Hove
described that the exact final number of preserved/removed trees will be determined following an actual
walk-through along staked grade limits to view specific trees. These specific tree preservation activities
will be required to ensure survival of these "edge" preserved trees. The resulting effect of this site walk-
through will be the adjustment of required tree mitigation. The final number of required tree mitigation
may also be altered as individual lot construction takes place. Hove noted that numbers 5-10 of the
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 5
Alternatives for Commission Considerations (Agenda Item G-1, page 13) included tree preservation
suggestions.
Members Peterson and Pletcher inquired about rating trees on a 10 point scale and how a rating is
determined. Hove responded that a rating depended on the health, physical condition and disease
condition of a tree. Use of the site usually causes a lower rate. This land contains trees with the highest
tree rating of 8 and the lowest rating 4.1. Average development properties would be slightly higher, Hove
said. Member Davis opined these numbers seemed low. Hove responded it is just a natural occurrence.
Discussion continued while viewing a map of the southern 1/3 of the land where the majority of the tree
preservation would occur. Member Danner asked about the condition of the Oak trees there. Hove
responded that the worst ones are located in the lower wetland area. Member Danner, referring to LP-7.2,
asked the width of the conservation easement. Member Davis stated that Danner's question was an
example of why the city staff recommends a flexible approach. Rather than deciding before actual
construction starts, the best decisions of tree preservation can be made during construction. Hove said he
hopes the amount of preservation increases as development starts.
Water Quality
Eric Macbeth, Water Resources, provided background and descriptions pertaining to storm water drainage
while using a map of the area. This proposed 38.0-acre subdivision is located primarily in the upper
portion of the City's LP1-Watershed, which flows west to east through numerous Class I, III, and IV
water bodies in Dakota County's Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Immediately downstream of the parcel
and in the county park is Jensen Lake, a state public water (DNR# 19-0071) and a Class II Indirect
Contact Recreation water body, according to the City's Water Quality Management (WQMP). The
northwesterly corner of the parcel is in the upper portion of the BP-Watershed, which drains through
Walden Heights Park to Thomas Lake, which is a Class I Direct Contact Recreation water body,
according to the WQMP.
The developer proposes to address City on-site storm water quality requirements primarily by treating
runoff via a series of ponds and wetlands, one pond of which would be new and two areas of which would
be modified. A 2.4-acre area (Drainage Area 1) on the north side of the parcel is proposed to drain to a
modified, low-lying "dry" pond (Pond 1).
Drainage Area 2 (15.5 acres), along with excessive runoff from Pond 1, would drain to a new storm water
pond (Pond 2), located next to existing Basin D in the north-central portion of the site. Basin D would
receive overland runoff from a surrounding 0.6-acre area as well as some treated storm water from Pond
2. Member Lodhi confirmed that Ponds 2 and 6 would be constructed. Macbeth explained the two areas
will be excavated to be used to for storm water treatment. Currently Pond 6 is flooded.
Drainage Area 3 (2.9 acres) would receive treated storm water from Drainage Areas 1 and 2 and drain to
an existing storm water pond (City Pond LP1-56), which is a Class IV Wildlife Habitat water body,
according to the WQMP. It would then drain offsite to the south to a small wetland (City Pond LP1-7A)
west of Jensen Lake. However, there is no direct storm water connection to Jensen Lake. Macbeth
explained the piping stays West of Pilot Knob Road.
Drainage Area 4 (1.7 acres) would contribute backyard overland flow to the northernmost wetland (Pond
4) of the three historical natural wetlands that have since been flooded. The WQMP classifies the
historical 3-wetland basin as one Class IV Wildlife Habitat water body.
Drainage Area 5 (1.7 acres) would add overland runoff to the southernmost natural wetland (Pond 5) of
this flooded basin. Pond 5 would drain offsite to Lebanon Hills Regional Park, but at a significantly lower
rate and of an appreciably lower amount than with existing conditions.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 6
Drainage Area 6 (9.6 acres) would drain to Pond 6, which would be a modification of the central part of
the flooded (non-natural) basin. On February 1, 2005, the Eagan City Council officially approved an
exemption from wetland replacement requirements for work to establish Pond 6 as a storm water
treatment pond. Pond 6 would provide some hydrology to Ponds 4 and 5, and Pond 4 would outlet to
Pond 5.
Member Peterson asked if there was an amount of water that would drain off site that would be subject to
payment to the City. Macbeth responded that there is a 4.9-acre combined area of the parcel that is
proposed to drain off site to the northwest, west, southwest, south, and southeast would be subject to a
cash dedication in lieu of onsite storm water treatment.
Minimum requirements for volume and area of water quality treatment ponds are based on the impervious
proportion of proposed developments (i.e., land covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways, and
walks). The impervious proportions of the drainage areas would be used to calculate overall minimum
treatment volume requirements for water quality purposes.
Wetlands
The wetland delineation report for the project site (GME Consultants, Inc.; Project No. 10745) identifies
five wetland basins subject to the City of Eagan's jurisdiction according to the Minnesota Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA). Any proposals to drain, fill, or excavate these wetlands need to meet all
provisions of WCA laws and rules. The report identifies the five wetlands as Basins A through E. On
February 1, 2005, the Eagan City Council officially approved the wetland delineations for the site.
Basin A, mentioned previously as City Pond LP1-56, is considered a Type 4 wetland, under the
classification system of the Fish and Wildlife Service. Type 4 wetlands are inland deep fresh marshes in
which the soils are usually covered with six inches to three feet or more of water during the growing
season. Vegetation may include cattails, reeds, and bulrushes. In this case, broad-leaf deciduous trees are
in a semi-permanent flooded basin.
Basin B is known as City Pond LP-72, which is also a Class IV Wildlife Habitat water body according to
the WQMP. The delineation report identifies this wetland as a Type 3 wetland. Type 3 wetlands are
inland shallow fresh marshes that are permanently inundated with six or more inches of watci during the
growing season. Vegetation includes grasses, bulrushes, and various other marsh plants such as cattails,
arrowheads, and smartweeds.
Basin C is identified as a flooded depression area that historically held three small wetlands. Together,
they are considered Type 3 wetlands, according to the delineation report.
Basin D, located near the north central portion of the site, is also considered a Type 3 wetland by the
delineation report.
Basin E, located near the east central portion of the site, is not typified by the delineation report.
However, it likely is a Type 3 wetland.
As was discussed in the completed Environmental Assessment Worksheet process, there is significant
evidence that all five wetlands have suffered varying degrees of degradation and varying amounts of fill
by previous landowners.
Wetland Replacement Plan
Due to the complexity of the wetland-related issues of this development, the City has relied on its
Wetland Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) since June 3, 2004 to provide technically accurate and
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 7
objective recommendations relative to the consistency of the project's proposed wetland replacement plan
with WCA laws and rules. Macbeth shared the process and conclusions of the TEP,
The TEP is comprised of staff with technical wetland expertise from the Dakota County Soil and Water
Conservation District, the Board of Water and Soil Resources, and the City of Eagan. According to State
regulations, the City is required to consider TEP recommendations in its decision making process and to
provide reasons if it disagrees with TEP findings and recommendations.
On February 1, 2005, the Eagan City Council requested the developer to provide a revised plan for onsite
wetland replacement versus offsite wetland banking, as was originally proposed The developer provided
such a revised plan to the City on February 15, 2005.
According to this plan, the developer proposes tofll entirely one of the historical wetlands of Basin C, a
portion of Basin D, and entirely Basin E for a total of 17,49 7 square feet of fill (vs. 26,40 7square feet of
fill originally). The plan proposes to replace these impacts by creating 17,500 square feet of new wetland
and by claiming 24,231 square feet of public value credit for construction of storm water treatment ponds
and establishing wetland buffers. The proposed amounts of onsite replacement exceed the minimum 2:1
standards of the WCA rules.
> Macbeth then said the TEP recommends denial of the proposed replacement and monitoring plan for
the following reasons:
Additional loss of significant trees within proposed Replacement Area 1; Macbeth said to
create wetland in this area would require grading and removal of 31 trees, which is
inconsistent with State standards for created wetlands.
Proposed replacement areas do not take advantage of naturally occurring landscape
conditions that support wetlands; Macbeth explained that much grading would have to occur
to get the low areas to "take".
Proposed Replacement Area 2 does not have a high likelihood of becoming a functioning
wetland due to need for continued removal of sediment; Macbeth said this would require a lot
of maintenance.
Both replacement areas require significant landscape alterations;
Significant retaining walls in excess of 12 feet would be required along Replacement Area 2,
creating safety hazards and prohibiting natural transitions of plants and movement of animals;
and
The proposed created wetlands would not result in characteristics consistent with those
specified in WCA rules. It is very questionable that a fully functioning wetland could be
created onsite within the context of the proposed development or planned land use.
A After thoroughly reviewing the revised application and all supplemental information, the TEP
recommends the use of a wetland bank because it creates the best ecological solution to replacing
impacted wetlands within this proposed development.
> The TEP would prefer to see Wetland D excavated and used for storm water management purposes.
Macbeth said this would be for quality treatment. The TEP believes this wetland will likely be lost or
suffer further diminished value over time due to significant reduction of contributing watershed area,
sediment accumulation, and vegetative alteration by adjacent land use. Although excavation would
increase wetland impacts back to the amount originally proposed, it would contribute to a better
grading plan from a storm water management standpoint. Macbeth said this would be on the back
Ta
side of 2 homes and part of a 3.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 8
> Minimum 30-foot natural buffers shall be provided next to wetlands on the site to support the City's
Class IV-Wildlife Habitat designation of these water bodies.
> Low-impact design features such as rainwater gardens and infiltration areas should be considered in
the final design phase to reduce the overall runoff volume from this proposed development.
> City water resources staff shall be involved in any on-site pre-construction, pre-grading meetings to
review and coordinate approved plans. Macbeth assured the commission and viewers the combined
experience of these people is 30 years. They have put forth a lot of effort on this matter and take it
very seriously. The tech panel is very comfortable with these recommendations at this time.
Chair Davis asked if the idea of rainwater gardens was discussed after the plan shown to the APrC or does
the current plan not show rainwater garden features to assist runoff volume. Macbeth answered that the
TEP's recommendation doesn't include rainwater gardens but the staff recommends it. Member Hansen
asked about onsite vs. off site banking. Macbeth said this was not listed as a first priority, but it is. TEP
believes off site banking is a good fit for this area. It works with the rules for wetland replacement
standards. The proposed idea of retaining walls around a wetland is not how we want our wetlands to be.
Chair Davis asked if there is a need to look within the city for another site and move the banking further
away. Macbeth responded that the ideal choice is to keep it onsite. When that is not feasible, to move it
off site where it would connect to the same watershed. Member Danner asked if wetland sequencing
would need to be discussed further. Member Lodhi asked if by changing the numbers of what the
developer plans to put there, will a difference be made. Macbeth answered that the commission needs to
work with the information they have in front of them
Davis questioned whether Wetland D would eliminate the need for a wall. Macbeth answered that
excavation of this kind of wetland creates enough of an impact. Member Danner asked about rainwater
gardens and where they would be placed. Macbeth said he did not propose where to put them, just
suggested the idea as an option. Member Peterson asked if Macbeth would consider placement of the
water gardens by walking the site, like Hove's plan, to determine tree preservation. Macbeth responded
that they would need to be put in an area of strategic value and function to pay off. Chair Davis asked if
placement of a water garden needs to minimize the impact on other areas. Macbeth said the impetus is
more runoff, not a wetland issue. When developing a site, if the developer adds more ibx pcr ious surface
it naturally results in more run off and the rain gardens would assist with this.
The TEP has provided the City its findings and conclusions on the revised wetland replacement plan. The
City will accept public comments on this application until 4:30 p.m. on March 28, 2005. A decision on
this matter is anticipated on April 19, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Eagan City Hall.
Parks and Trails Dedication
Chair Davis asked Cherryl Mesko to give input regarding Parks and Trails Dedication. The area of the
development is currently serviced by a variety of parks with a wide variety of amenities within the
recommended radius of a service area for a neighborhood park of 1/2 to 1/4 of a mile. The largest of the
parks, Dakota County's, Lebanon Hills Regional Park, extends the entire length of the developments
south boundary. The park provides a number of recreational opportunities including, hiking, mountain
biking, canoeing, pavilions, and a play structure. The Jenson Lake recreation area is located
approximately I/4 mile from the development and will be directly accessible via a proposed trail
connection. Much of Lebanon Hills is dedicated to preservation with hundreds of acres of quality
woodland left undisturbed.
The development area is also serviced by two existing City parks, George.Ohmann and Walden Heights.
Each of the parks has a play structure and field space. Ohmann is a heavily used athletic facility that
includes a small shelter building. Both are available via a trail or low volume residential road.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 9
The slopes, degraded condition of large portions of the site and allowable density do not appear
conducive to proposing the dedication of park land, though there may be opportunity for the dedication of
conservation easements, protecting areas of the site, to the City. Easements over the more sensitive
slopes, pond buffers and the quality woodlands of a site are very common. Because the under lying title
for the property would remain as part of the development, no dedication credit would be given. The
Developer has suggested in concept, the creation of easements over sensitive areas in several woodland
and wetland areas. Further clarification from the Developer regarding the extent of easements may be
necessary.
Trails
Mesko stated that at the suggestion of staff, the development includes the installation of an 8 foot
bituminous connector trail, extending from the existing Pilot Knob boulevard trail, through a portion of
the development to the existing County Park trail. The County trail runs under Pilot Knob to the east, via
an existing tunnel, to the Jenson Lake recreation area and beyond. To the west, the County trail connects
into a number of internal amenities including mountain bike and hiking trails. A direct trail connection
from the existing boulevard trail on Pilot Knob has been sought for some time. The intention being to
negate the need to cross Pilot Knob, to access County and City park facilities located on the easy side of
Pilot knob. Due to the steep slope and desire to minimize disruption, sections of the trail may not meet
ADA requirements over short distances. Equivalent access to the County Park amenities is available via a
trail from the parking lot on the east side of Pilot Knob. This approach is common in park settings having
multiple points of access.
Dakota County has indicated general acceptance of the trail connection into the County park system. They
have requested that signage be installed informing park users that bikes are not allowed in park except on
the designated bike trails. Should the connector trail be installed, the development would be given trail
credit, utilizing a City formula. Any balance due would be paid in cash. While functional, credit would
generally not be given for any internal sidewalks that are developed primarily at the discretion of the
Developer.
Collin Roetman, representing Toll Brothers, and Andy Berenberg, Project Engineer (P..LK Kuusisto)
spoke next. Roetman reviewed previous City meetings and various proposals. Per City Council request
Toll Brothers changed the style of homes to be single story homes for "empty nesters" rather than a full
two story home. City council also requested a looped road be added and increased the width of the street
and right of way. Roetman stated that originally Toll Brothers planned for off site wetlands mitigation.
Onsite mitigation causes tree loss to increase by 5% since the houses are required to be wider and deeper,
and the streets are required to be wider: These changes required the houses be up to 25' from the curb
and shortened the driveways.
Roetman said there were a lot of natural features making wetlands mitigation more difficult. The
topography is difficult to work with since the land running North to South lowers by 60 feet; therefore the
tree areas are naturally deeper. He said it's difficult to get a viable wetland on the North section due to
neighbors' concerns about grading. Roetman showed a map to view elevation and further discussed the
slop from Basin C, stating there is a problem on the East side since the road has to connect with Pilot
Knob.
Member Danner inquired about the distance between homes and LP-72. Roetman answered that the
wetland edge and the waters edge are 8 feet apart. The developers are trying to keep a minimum of 30
feet between the back of the homes and the wetland edge. Member Danner asked if there is concern of a
high water level, however as Berenberg responded, Chair Davis reminded them this issue did not belong
to APrC, but to the APC. Roetman stated that using walkout basements is a way to save trees.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 10
Member Davis asked Roetman and Berenberg if they have experience working with the water plan
discussed by Macbeth. Berenberg responded that runoff feeds into the wetlands. Rain gardens try to
control the volume of open land that runs off. The rain garden is there to enhance, over and above, what
the standards require. If rain gardens are not cared for they can become maintenance issues so the
developers want ensure it is designed properly so it does not create future maintenance problems.
Neighboring resident, Eric Vevea of 1446 Sherwood Way spoke to the APrC. He voiced his concern
about the amount of rain runoff and how it would affect neighboring yards and houses. Vevea suggested
citizens to put their name on a wetland mailing list and asked that the City accept liability for damage
from storm water runoff. Vevea showed a historic map from the Dept. of U.S. Fish and Wildlife to show
the amount of water that was handled by this land and compared it to a current map of this area. Vevea
had many questions regarding the wetlands on the site. Berenberg responded that, of the actual runoff,
only a small amount that goes into Basin C; 4.9 acres are unmitigated and untreated. The water to LP-72
is not touched, currently over 5 acres and proposing 2 acres. The untouched area will drain back to the
treatment ponds.
Vevea asked Macbeth to refer to the Fish and Wildlife map and asked Macbeth where the water goes after
it has run into the basins that were shown on the map. Macbeth told Vevea that people who work in the
field of water resources do not rely on these maps (using it to apply to another map). Macbeth said he
does not deny changes have occurred with regards to the area was flooded in the past. The runoff from the
site would be similar to what happens now. Runoff is common and the runoff would go to the same place
without LP-72. The city has to apply standards to water treatment. The natural lay of the land will
remain and drain the same and to try to run them backwards is impervious. They must do the best they
can for onsite treatment.
Vevea stated that the 1990 Storm water Management Plan Map shows a pipe connecting this development
with Jensen Lake and the county indicated LP-56 runs into the park under Pilot Knob. Vevea said the top
priority of sequencing is avoidance. He asked if altering the current plans by taking out a few more lots
and houses would be considered to provide this better sequencing.
Roetman said there could be a pipe shown on the map because if flood water builds up high enough it
may go to Jensen Lake. He said that onsite mitigation can be done but it does not seem prat ical. There
is a grade difference from Pilot Knob so the water can go to the West but it would disturb the land. There
are not many trees and it is not good wetland soil in this area. Roetman stated if the goal is to save the
trees, then on-site mitigation is not feasible due to Basin C. Due to the horse corral and the dumping
grounds, this situation has been very carefully designed and looked at over and over. Roetman offered
that if someone else can help him do better, he would be open to suggestions.
Eagan Resident, Dee Bass introduced herself and said she was there to discuss LP-72. Bass stated that 7
pond owners and 6 other homes use this pond. Bass and the other residents are concerned about building
the town homes closer to LP-72. Bass asked Roetman how far the homes are located from the pond.
Roetman informed Bass the closest home is 41 feet, then 47 and 68 feet or more; the massing of homes
are broken down so they are not extra large and are easier to place around the water. Chair Davis
redirected the conversation when discussion became a planning concern.
Next, Tom Faber, from 1518 Knottingham Way, said he would like to change the legacy of the Diamond
T Ranch from "Pollution, PCB's and Poop" to "Preservation, Protection and Pedestrian Pass". Faber
requested a secondary emergency access. He asked for a trail to Pilot Knob Road from Block 2, Lot 5 or
Lebanon Hills to connect to Steeplechase Court. Cartney stated the City Staff will not support a second
access at this time. This item would have to be presented to the planning Commission. Chair Davis
thanked Faber for his creativity and environmental sensitivity.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 11
Kay Hamilton of 4872 Knottingham Circle opined the 76% tree removal is excessive. She asked why the
numbers are so out of line compared to the ordinance. Hamilton said she believes it is critical to maintain
as much land as possible and stated concern about the water runoff caused by missing trees. Macbeth
responded saying there is no problem with the runoff, staff and developers know there will be runoff and
are taking it into consideration. Hamilton asked that the city enforce the ordinance with no floating
number system or allowance for more trees to be taken.
Mike Terrell of 1514 Wellington Way asked to discuss "public value credits" and asked how many
wetland to pond credits are allowed. Macbeth said there are two areas on the map that have been
constructed for storm water treatment, and they can be applied to replacement. The developer is claiming
these areas for public value credit, which State Rules allow.
Brad Moyer of 1510 Wellington Way asked that a cash Park Dedication be changed to a land dedication.
Moyer asked the City to convert the land adjacent to LP-72 to a park rather than receiving a cash
dedication. Moyer asked if this land could be used, not as a playground, but to remain as green space that
would benefit the water quality. This would also allow homes within 100 feet to see more land rather
than townhouses.
Hamilton returned, asking why the City would consider eliminating so many trees, having a standard but
allowing the ordinance to change so much. Chair Davis asked attorney Bob Bauer to answer this
question. Bauer stated that there is a standard set to preserve the trees but there is also an allowance in
place to remove more trees when necessary for development. The difference in the allowed amount of
trees removed and the amount that are actually taken needs to be replaced onsite or off site. Hamilton
responded that if they didn't remove so many that they wouldn't have to replace that many.
Bass read from previous plans that stated 100 feet between homes and water. She stated that homes are
now closer to the water than before and was concerned about runoff affecting basements of homes.
Macbeth responded that runoff occur the same as it does now. Member Filipi encapsulated that the
bottom line is the proximity within our standards and if TEP item 3 is marked as yes we can interpret that
full requirements have been met.
Member Peterson said the alternatives 1-18 were fine. She opined that staff has ;°dorkcd hard and the
APrC should trust their professional judgment, trusting they are giving us the best they can right now.
When question regarding water flow was asked, Macbeth replied he was not comfortable answering water
flow questions; these type of questions need to be answered by City Engineering.
Member Belfiori referred to erodable slopes, stating that uprooting takes away natural erosion control.
Stating how we choose to do this will result in how we transfer pollutants down stream. Member Bari
asked how much weight we give to TEPs, opining that all information discussed about the wetlands
seems to be negative. Chair Davis clarified that Bari meant negative in respect to the proposed plan.
Macbeth responded that this project is required to get a storm water pollution prevention permit.
Regarding TEP recommendations, the City is required to consider them, and if it doesn't go along with
them, it must provide rationale as part of its decision. Member Bari asked if the storm water permit
would override TEP recommendations. Macbeth answered, no, stating that these two items were under
separate and unrelated authorities: Storm water permits, under CA jurisdiction, work to prevent
downstream damage from runoff; wetlands conservation rules, administered by the City, are meant to
achieve no net loss of wetlands. Member Bari asked if the Pollution Control Permit would override TEP
recommendations. Macbeth answered, no, stating that these two items were not related to each other.
Member Bari asked if these permits carried more weight than TEP Macbeth answered that these are two
separate items; pollution control permits work to prevent damage downstream, the Wetland Act works
within the city.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 12
Member Danner asked, regarding LP-72, how the topography will change after removal of the dump site,
spring erosion and the trees have been removed. Bauer responded that as part of the development
agreement, with lots of permits attached, full compliance would occur and this area would be filled in.
Member Bari clarified the motion of TEP with Member Peterson.
Roetman clarified that onsite mitigation added 5%, 10,000 sq. feet, of wetlands but TEP removed it and
added it to the pond area. Member Belfiori asked where the trees typically are planted when offsite
mitigation occurs. Forester Hove answered that these trees can be planted anywhere, not specifically near
the development or even in Eagan.
After discussion of replanting trees, and the suggestion of Chair Davis, Member Belfiori asked that an
addendum be attached to their recommendation that tree mitigation take place in the city of Eagan.
Lawyer answered that this will be included as part of the rules, making the watershed first priority.
Member Belfiori pointed out the watershed is much bigger than the city of Eagan. Member Peterson
answered that it is difficult to find a large enough area in Eagan to plan that many trees. Member Belfiori
moved to amend that tree mitigation include replanting as many of the trees, as reasonable, in the City of
Eagan.
Chair Davis motioned to approve Steeplechase Alternatives 1-18 as amended with all present members
voting to approve.
ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
1. The park dedication shall be satisfied through a cash dedication.
2. The development shall dedicate conservation easements to the City over those portions of the site
described as; (To be determined as necessary). The conditions of said easement to be determined in
consultation with the City Attorney and City staff, pending approval of the City Council.
3. The development shall install an 8 foot wide bituminous connector trail extending from the existing
west Pilot Knob boulevard trail, south and west to the existing County trail, within a 15 foot
easement, to be dedicated to the City. Said trail to be built to City standards with the alignment to
be determined in consultation with City and County staff. Said trail corridor to be established prior
to the construction of homes. All required walls, guard rails, fencing and other safey a atures shall
be the responsibility of the development.
4. The trail dedication shall be satisfied with a credit of $10 per lineal foot being given for the new
connector trail and the reasonable cost of the elements required to construct the trail, any balance
due paid in cash. Said trail to be constructed per the agreed upon plan however the credit may not
exceed what would be required as a total cash trail dedication.
5. The applicant shall fulfill the required tree mitigation through the installation of five-hundred thirty-
four (534) Category B trees, or an equivalent combination of Category A, B, or C trees.
6. To ensure survival of preserved trees that have encroachment occurring inside the tree's critical
root zone (CRZ), staff is recommending that a long-term tree survival plan be prepared by a
certified arborist and implemented on all trees with encroachment into the CRZ. The applicant
shall communicate with city forestry staff in the actual placement of tree protection fence around
these trees.
7. To utilize a "floating number" system pertaining to the final number of mitigation trees required.
Complete fulfillment of all required mitigation to be installed prior to final project completion.
8. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to identify additional opportunities for
preservation during the development and construction process.
9. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) shall be required to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root
Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 13
10. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection
at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved
Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
11. Storm water runoff from approximately 87 percent of the site (33.8 acres) shall be treated onsite via
a series of constructed ponds and existing wetlands. Minimum volume requirements for such
treatment shall be in accordance with the City's water quality management plan.
12. A cash dedication in lieu of ponding shall be required for the 4.9-acre area of the parcel that is
proposed to drain off site to the northwest, west, southwest, south, and southeast without any
treatment.
13. The TEP recommends denial of the proposed replacement and monitoring plan for the following
reasons:
> Additional loss of significant trees within proposed Replacement Area 1;
> Proposed replacement areas do not take advantage of naturally occurring landscape
conditions that support wetlands;
> Proposed Replacement Area 2 does not have a high likelihood of becoming a functioning
wetland due to need for continued removal of sediment;
> Both replacement areas require significant landscape alterations;
> Significant retaining walls in excess of 12 feet would be required along Replacement Area 2,
creating safety hazards and prohibiting natural transitions of plants and movement of animals;
and
> The proposed created wetlands would not result in characteristics consistent with those
specified in WCA rules. It is very questionable that a fully functioning wetland could be
created onsite within the context of the proposed development or planned land use.
14. After thoroughly reviewing the revised application and all supplemental information, the TEP
recommends the use of a wetland bank because it creates the best ecological solution to replacing
impacted wetlands within this proposed development.
15. The TEP would prefer to see Wetland D excavated and used for storm water management purposes.
The TEP believes this wetland will likely be lost or suffer further diminished value over time due to
significant reduction of contributing watershed area, sediment accumulation, and vegetative
alteration by adjacent land use. Although excavation would increase wetland impacts back to the
amount originally proposed, it would contribute to a better grading plan from. a storm water
management standpoint.
16. Minimum 30-foot natural buffers shall be provided next to wetlands on the site to support the City's
Class IV-Wildlife Habitat designation of these water bodies.
17. Low-impact design features such as rainwater gardens and infiltration areas should be considered in
the final design phase to reduce the overall runoff volume from this proposed development.
18. City water resources staff shall be involved in any on-site pre-construction, pre-grading meetings to
review and coordinate approved plans.
NATURES POINT
Cartney presented the background and history, saying the applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning
from Agriculture to Public Facility and R-1 single family residential to PD, Planned Development; a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Quasi Public to LD, Low Density Residential; a Preliminary
Subdivision of 1.2.8 acres to create 33 lots and a Preliminary Planned Development to allow 32 twins
homes.
The applicant proposed smaller lots with reduced setbacks, a private drive, and a cell tower that is less
than 300 feet from a residential use which do not meet code requirements to allow for Twin Homes. As
part of the Planned Development requirements, the applicant provided a conforming plan which conforms
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 14
to R-2 standards, the applicant states this plan is undesirable because of the impact on the tree loss
(increase from 67.5% to 74%) and the connection of Taconite Trail to Deerwood Drive would go through
an existing wetland in the existing right-of-way of Taconite Trail. The applicant justifies the need for a
Planned Development by way of preserving more trees, a lesser unit count (32 rather than 34) and no
wetland impacts.
The Public hearing for this proposal is scheduled for March 22, 2005 at the regular Advisory Planning
Commission meeting. This item is then scheduled for the April 19, 2005 City council meeting. Member
Peterson asked for clarification of the date of 120 day application; June 29 is the end date.
The subject site is currently 3 unplatted tax parcels. Two of the lots have single family homes present and
the other lot has an AT&T freestanding cell tower. The parcel that the cell tower is located on is zoned
Agriculture and guided Quasi Public as proposed the cell tower will be platted separately from the
development and will be rezoned to Public Facility and keeps the Quasi Public Comp Plan Designation,
the rest of the parcel will be rezoned to Planned Development and re-guided to Low Density Residential.
Parks and Trails Dedication
Cheryl Mesko informed the viewers that parks and trails dedication for this development shall be satisfied
through a cash dedication.
Tree Preservation
City Forester Hove presented a map, stating the tree inventory indicates there are 317 significant trees.
Species Count % of Total
Oak 140 44%
Black Cherry 80 25%
Spruce 28 9%
The development will result in the removal of two hundred fourteen (214) significant trees, (67.5%). City
ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple-lot, single
unit residential) is set at 40% of the total significant trees. Required tree mitigation to replace trees
removed in excess of allowable limits calculates to two hundred sixty four (264) or one lhundred t hirty
two (132) category A trees.
The applicant has submitted a "Preliminary Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan" that shows the installation
of 125 Category A trees (the equivalent of two hundred fifty (250) category B trees. Hove stated the
developer will also transplant Spruce, but this is cannot be counted in the mitigation. Instead these seven
trees are classifieds "preserved trees" on the tree preservation plan. City would require the developer to
provide a one year maintenance agreement to guarantee survival of the transplanted trees for the first
year. Also, there is to be no encroachment inside protected critical root zone or at the drip line of
preserved trees, whichever is greater. The applicant should submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that
would first show no grading inside the critical root zone and second, the Tree Preservation Plan should
indicate the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures as shall be installed at the Drip Line
or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be
preserved onsite. Also, 18 trees will be transplanted along Taconite Trail.
Water Quality/Wetlands
This proposed 12.6 acre residential subdivision is located in the upper portion of the City's watershed A.
Storm water will drain to the west toward the Minnesota River. Because of the size and location of the
parcel, this project is subject to City water quality requirements.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 15
The developer proposed to meet water quality requirements by constructing one storm water pond in the
northwest portion of the site, located just south of the existing cell tower.
Wetlands
According to a wetland delineation report by Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. there are two
jurisdictional wetlands associated with this site. Water Resources staff is comfortable with the
delineations as presented.
One wetland is located at the end of the existing Taconite Trail. The majority of the other wetland is
located in the extreme southwest corner of the parcel. Neither wetland is supposed to be directly
impacted by draining, filling or excavation.
Rich Ragatz of Epic Development informed the viewers he would like to use a storm septer, an
underground tank, rather than a pond because of the challenging topography of this area. This septer
would do the same job, taking care of 2.25 acres of runoff, and would preserve more of the trees. If a
pond is chosen, would take care of 5 V2 acres of runoff. The current pond would be expanded by 4500 sq.
feet which would increase the total tree loss to 72%. Ragatz asked that city staff to offer him alternative
ideas if they see any other ways to cut down on tree death, stating he wants to "stay away from the
wetlands". Ragatz also said he wants to consult with Macbeth regarding the small pond.
Ragatz described the septer as a huge, underground storage tank with a cement lid. A truck is brought in
to suction out the debris. The septer requires the same maintenance as an excavated pond and would be
paid for the by the Homeowners Association.
Member Peterson asked Ragatz if there would be a time setback if the APrC deferred this and asked him
to come back with more information. Member Filipi stated he is not a fan of storm septers because of the
front cost on the maintenance. Ragatz said in order to utilize the current storm water pond with an
easement, the neighbors would like to increase the level of the pond. Lodhi asked how many trees would
be transplanted. Ragatz answered it is currently planned 7 to 8 trees to transplant and others will be
looked at. He stated it is expensive to move them, but worth it. We wouldn't transplant them if it didn't
work. Chair Davis asked Ragatz if he works with an arborist. Ragatz answered yes, he works with
someone to provide tree care, for a contracted time of one year.
Lisa Brown, 1730 Taconite Trail, addressed the APrC saying she believes her home the most affected by
this development. Brown said she was concerned about the number of large trees that would be removed
and the amount of water runoff that would flow towards her yard. Brown said her yard ponds regularly
when it rains and she is concerned about a larger amount of water flowing into a small area. Discussion
revolved around water flow and the group was reminded that this is a subject for the Planning
Commission.
At this time Lisa Brown, 1730 Taconite Trail, addressed the APrC stating she considered her home the
most affected by this development. Brown said she was concerned about the number of large trees that
would be removed and the amount of water runoff is a high concern. Brown said her yard ponds
regularly when it rains and she is concerned about a larger amount of water going into a small area.
Planner Cartney informed the commission they can recommend continuation of this subject until the
April 19th City Council meeting. Member Peterson motioned to defer the approval of the septer to April
19th to have more time to learn about the storm water septer.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 16
ALTERNATIVES FOR CO SSION CONS TION:
1. This Development shall be responsible for a cash parks dedication
2. This Development shall be responsible for a cash trails dedication
3. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Mitigation Plan that fulfills required tree preservation
mitigation through the installation of one-hundred thirty-two (132) Category A trees, or an
equivalent combination of Category A, B, and/or Category C trees. The revised Tree Mitigation
Plan should indicate specific quantities of mitigation trees to be used.
4. The applicant shall preserve, through contractual tree transplanting with a 90" tree spade
(minimum diameter), seven (7) existing spruce trees (#138, 139, 180, 186, 191, 193, and 194), to
be moved to an area outside of construction limits, then returned to areas within the development
site. Transplanted trees will be maintained (mulched and irrigated) for a period of one year by
applicant or hired contractor.
5. The applicant submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan that shows no encroachment inside
preserved tree critical root zones, and the correct placement of required Tree Protective measures
(i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) be installed at the
Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant
trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site.
6. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection
at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the
approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
7. Submitted storm water quality plans are insufficient and incomplete for staff to fully evaluate and
forward recommendations.
8. The wetland delineation report should be formally accepted as submitted.
9. It is unclear whether any connection between the storm water pond and the small wetland will be
made and whether any associated impacts would result.
OL D BUSINESS
There were no items for the APrC to review under Old Business
NEW BUS-11-NESS
PUBLIC HEARING: THRESHER FIELDS GRANT APPLICATION
The City Council designated the Advisory Parks Commission meeting of March 14, 2005 as the public
hearing date required for the application of Outdoor Recreation Grant. This grant will assist with further
development of Thresher Fields. Notice of the public hearing section of the March 14, 2005 APrC
meeting was published with the APrC agenda in the City's newspaper of record.
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 17
Chair Davis asked that this discussion be noted as a Public Hearing. He asked C.J. Lilly, Landscape
Architect and Parks Planner for the City, to give a brief overview of Thesher Fields. Lilly familiarized the
audience with Thresher Fields and the improvements that are desired to enhance the park.
Lilly stated Thresher Park is located north of Yankee Doodle at the intersection of Mike Roetman Drive
and Orchard Lane. Formerly known as North Park, this site contains a 14 acre pond and a portion was
previously used as a construction recycling area. Imperial Developers has already improved the park by
adding an access road, and parking lots for 30 cars and 120 cars. Sidewalks and storm sewer are now
present and water and electricity are "stubbed in" and accessible for future use.
The City of Eagan will submit an application for the Outdoor Recreation Grant to enhance the Thresher
Fields complex. The proposed project includes park shelter buildings that will function as a restroom,
weather/sun shelter, trail head, play equipment and gathering area. The use of Thresher Fields is mixed;
partially groomed athletic fields with uses ranging from practice to tournament play. The proposed
shelter building would be the only rest area available for public use in the vicinity. The site is anticipated
for heavy use such as tournament play, and a permanent structure would offer comfort and ease of
maintenance.
The proposed project will include a soft trail that will connect to Yankee Doodle Road to the South.
Future trail expansion can provide for a loop to the west and reconnection to the park from the North.
The shelter building would serve as the trail head and shelter/rest area for the trail. Additionally, a trail
extension from Mike Roetman Drive would enhance the safety of pedestrians entering the park.
The proposed shelter building provides refuge for both functions of the park. It will serve as shelter for
inclement weather, a meeting area for visitors, host team or personal events like picnics or afternoon play,
and provide restrooms. The facility will be ADA compliant and use energy efficient fixtures and resilient
materials that have become standard in Eagan park buildings.
The building would be an approximately 2,600 square foot open sided pavilion with male and female
ADA compliant restroom facilities. There would be additional space for maintenance supplies and
storage, bulletin boards, landscape surroundings, picnic tables and grill surrounded by a landscaped buffer
from the parking area. The building would have water hook ups to serve the restrooms. Near the shelter
complex, a moderate area of play equipment would be installed to provide additional recreational uses of
Thresher Fields.
Implementation Schedule
Park shelter buildings of this size and scope have typically been able to complete substantial construction
within the year they begin. It is anticipated that the proposed project could be completed in 2006.
Overall cost and the yroposed financing for the project
The total anticipated cost of the proposed project is $431,000. The DNR requires a 50% match for
funding consideration, thus the grant request is $215,500. The local match, then, becomes $215,500 to be
allocated from the Park Site Fund. The Park Site Fund is derived from developer fees during the
subdivision process.
Costs to be assessed to coan unity residents
Project financing is proposed to be 50% state grant funding, and 50% from the Park Site Fund. Since the
Park Site Fund is derived from developer contribution rather than taxation or special assessment, it is not
anticipated that the proposed project will have any cost assessed to community residents.
Other associated project costs
Other costs associated with the project would be regular maintenance costs built in to the City's
operational and maintenance budget and schedule. Regular maintenance costs are estimated to be
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 14, 2005
Page 18
$11,118 per year, and value costs (time allocated by staff) are expected to be approximately $9,858 per
year over the next 20 years.
Member Danner asked for clarification regarding of the amount of money, stating the amount was higher
than previously estimated. Member Peterson said 2006 is the anticipated date if the grant is received.
Chair Davis confirmed the higher cost estimate did account for a price differential between now and the
potential construction date. Chair Davis asked if the audience had any questions regarding Thresher
Fields or the DNR grant. The audience remained silent. Chair Davis suggested the Public Hearing come
to a close. Member Peterson moved to submit the grant application for the Outdoor Recreation Grant
through the Department of Natural Resources. Member Bari seconded and all present voted to approve.
The City.Council has this item scheduled for its March 15th Council meeting. The completed application
will be submitted to the DNR by March 31, 2005. Should the project request be accepted, the project
could be completed in 2006.
~ATE
There were no items for the APrC to review under Water resources.
.SS zkND REPORTS
There were no items for the APrC to review.
RO
Chair Davis suggested an APrC meeting be held at the Community Center if the ECC had the technical
capability of hosting the live meeting. Mesko responded that if a meeting was not feasible, at least an
APrC workshop could be held there. Chair Davis also suggested Moonshine Park and Member Bari
agreed, suggesting the possibility of an outside fire. Conducting a workshop or tour of the ECC and
Moonshine Park will be investigated.
ADJtOURN.'1Et dT
With no further business to conduct, Chair Davis moved, Member Pletcher seconded with all members
voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
Secretary Date