Loading...
525 Cliff Rd - Correspondence re: BL84696 B~~ Peg- IIT 8 624 City of Eaafl Mike Maguire May 12, 2008 MAYOR Paul Bakken Barry Jaeger Jaeger Construction Peggy Carlson 2317 Waters Dr Cyndee Fields Eagan, MN 55120 Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS RE: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Thomas Hedges Dear Barry: CITY ADMINISTRATOR We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above-referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed. Please provide these items to that the City may MUNICIPAL CENTER complete your plan review: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 1. 2 sets of Civil Plans (ie: site, grading, erosion, and utility) 651.675.5000 phone 2. 1 SAC Determination letter from MCES 651.675.5012 fax 3. 2 sets of Landscaping Plans 651.454.8535 TDD 4. 1 set of Energy Calculations (signed) 5. 1 Electric Power & Lighting form (enclosed) 6. 1 Emergency Response Site Plan (example enclosed) MAINTENANCE FACILITY 7. Fire Stopping submittals 3501 coachman Point 8. Fire Protection System plan review information (form enclosed) Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at (651) 675-5683. 651.675.5360 fax Sincerely, 651.454.8535 TDD 6 Craig Novaczyk www.cityofeagan.com Senior Building Inspector Cc: Mark Pope, RLP Architects Inc, 2443 Farrington Circle, Roseville, MN 55113 Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works JohnAGorder 410"Wt City Engineer THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. I City of Eaaali Mike Maguire May 28, 2008 MAYOR Barry Jaeger Paul Bakken Jaeger Construction Peggy Carlson 2317 Waters Dr Cyndee Fields Eagan, MN 55120 Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS RE: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Thomas Hedges Dear Barry: CITY ADMINISTRATOR We have completed our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above-referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed: MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road 1. Eagan, MN 55122-1810 a) Guards for stairs B.6 shall comply with Section 1013.2 (2006 IBC). 651.675.5000 phone Reference detail 4, A-9 of your plan. 651.675.5012 fax b) Provide revised details for guards and graspable hand railings. 651.454.8535 TDD 2. Provide guard and hand railing details for stair B-15, include a detail for the guard protecting the opening to below. 3. Provide an elevation detail for the reception counter (the desk by owner note MAINTENANCE FACILITY does not exclude the need for a detail). 4. Provide details for the recommended under slab drainage system mentioned in 3501 Coachman Point paragraph C.4 of the Soils Report. Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at (651) 675-5683. 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD Sincerely, Craig Novaczyk www.cityofeagan.com Senior Building Inspector Cc: Mark Pope, RLP Architects Inc, 2443 Farrington Circle, Roseville, MN 55113 Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. 06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 02/04 City of Eagan Fire Protection System Plan Review Information Incomplete Information WILL delay the processing of your building permit, Date: Street Address 525 Cliff Road, Eagan, M Facility Name: Woodcrest Church Approx. Start Date: Approx. Completion Date. Month Year Month Year Li/C- Sprinkler Contractor / ~PL License COs 7 Street Address: ~c G3S ( h w~ /o City: ~X + ?Q f State: Zip Code: ______n Designer: Phone 7 Fax -7~.? --5!`t~/- Building Code Occupancy Classification (MSBC Chapter 3) A: 01 ?2 X3 04 05 B: ID E: 0 F: 01 02 H. ?1 ?2 ?3 04 ?5 I: 01 LJZ LJ3 04 M.0 K.u i L_JL 0.5 LJ4 . U1 Liz U; LJ Building Code Construction Classification (MSBC Chapter 6) I: ?A ?B It: DIA OB III: DA 08 IV: ?A 08 V: DA ®B Approx. bldB• footprint (sf): No. levels (incl. bsmt.) Approx. # of heads: /3 Briefly describe the primary use of this building: CA tiL ~ Sprinkler System Design Basis Briefl describe the scope of work: 1Zrs1 Cj _ LIN',/ r k13 ?-13R 013D Edition: 01999 02002 ?Other NFPA: 0 Insurance Co. (attach letter) ? Partial system (attach Code Official letter) ? Code variance? Explain: 'Check this box -i ? acknowledging that 13R is the applicable standard as no other building credits (i.e. height, area, ~cess) have been applied to this facility. Verify with the architect or builder. Failure to provide this acknowledgment .r a 13R design may delay this plan review and permission to commence work on the project. • 06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 03/04 • DRernote Station or Central Station Monitoring will be provided for this system (>20 new heads,>100 new/existing heads) Water Supply;1 Public Main DFire Pump*(rated capacity Pressure; ) DTank/Reservoir: (•If supply is from a fire pump, p, provide factory test curve or latest field narformanca tPCt a»ri InrlirQto driver h.po.) Date of Test: Location: Static Pressure: psi Residual Pressure: psi Flow: gpm Size of Main To Bldg: in. Combined W/Domestic?D Y iD N Size: in. Solenoid Provided? 0 Y 0 N System Type: Wet 0 Dry 0 Preaction 0 Deluge Sprinkler Sys in Design Criteria Description of Hazard Area/Density' .Reference Notes Area Ciafsification 7 of stem or Other Basis.-. ..,Sections rem A1n', ~~e o47 e ] • Miscellaneous storage as defined in NFPA 13 applies to this occupancy. DY JRN • Is the roof slope greater than 2 Inches in 12 Inches? DY M.N If yes, roof slope is; • Flammable/comb. liquid use or storage: DY ON If yes, detail information below • Aerosol storage DY ~N if yes, detail information below • Hazardous material use or storage DY k N If yes, detail information below • Plastic manufacture or storage DY ON If yes, detail Information below • High-pled/rack storage (>12 ft) DY (N If yes, complete page 3 for HPS Detail of hazard(s): I have completed the information on this form accurately and to the best of my knowledge. If the design and/or Scope of Work changes from that which is represented here, r will notify the City of Eagan's Building Inspections Division In a timely manner. I have read and understand Minnesota Statute 299M regarding Fire Protection Licensing and the enaitles for providing Use information. Printed Name Signature 'ail address: LO ~i lJ( r~ ~S '`r~~ . Cor 06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 04/04 WA High-Piled & Rack Storage (HIPS) High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials in closely packed piles or combustible materials on pallets, in racks or on shelves, where the top of storage is greater than 12 feet in height- It also Includes certain high-hazard commodities such as rubber tires; group-A plastics, flammable liquids, Idle pallets, and other such commodities where the top of storage is greater than 6 feet in height. N Stage Fire Code (03) Section 2302.11. Check all that apply o„r.,l r;i.,,i 1)1' 1714 M01-N 01n ayc. Ol Dr' vv000 raaec: U C UN Flastit Pallet: ?Y ON Solid Shelf OY ON Single Row: DY ON Double Row: DY ON Multiple Row: DY ON Bin-Box: DY ON Encapsulated: OY ON Storage height: Roof height: Aisle Width: ft. Transverse Flue Space: in. Longitudinal Flue Space: in. ? Class I Commodity (Describe): ArealDensity: Section/Figure/Curve: ? Class It Commodity (Describe): Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve: ? Class III Commodity (Describe): Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve: ? Class IV Commodity (Describe): Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve: *If storage contains limited amounts of Group-A plastics in mixed quantities, state the overall commodity classification from Fig. 2303.7.4 (2003 MSFC.) Protection induces: OStd. Sprinklers OELO ?Large Drop DESFR Din-rack sprinklers Additional Notes: G.-/Bldg Insp/Perrnltnpps/Flrc Proteofon System Plan Review-Comm Form Construction Materials Testing and Observations Final Report Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Jaeger Construction, LLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 RECEIVED Braun Intertec Corporation FEB 0 6 2009 EAGAN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT BRAUN Braun tnterfee Corporation Phone: 651.487.3245 I NTE RTEC 1826 Buerkle Road Fax: 651.487.1812 Saint Paul, MN 551 10 Web: brounintertec.com February 3, 2009 Project SP-08-01093A Mr. Barry Jaeger Jaeger Construction, LLC 525 Cliff Road Eagan, Minnesota Re: Construction Materials Testing and Observations Final Report Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Jaeger: We appreciate the opportunity to provide construction materials testing and observation services for the Woodcrest Church addition in Eagan, Minnesota. Please find attached to this letter the following documents. ¦ Non-Structural Steel Special Inspections Final Report and Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 12 ¦ Addendum 1 to Geotechnical Evaluation • Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Results, Sets 1 through 9 ¦ Moisture Density Relationship Test Results (ASTM D 698), Proctor P-1 and P-2 ¦ Field Compaction Test Results, Tests 1 through 22 ¦ Daily Field Notes, Reports 1 through 16 ¦ Masonry Block Net Area Determination ¦ Compressive Strength Masonry Prisms, Set 1 If you have any questions or require additional information, please call Joel Kurpius at 651.487.7006. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Joel C. Kurpius, PE Project Engineer SP0801093A Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 li t Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Jaeger Construction, PLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN Braun lntertec Corporation Phone: 651.487.3245 NTE RTE 1826 Buerkle Road Fax: 651.487.18 12 Saint Paul, MN 55110 Web: braunintertec.com February 3, 2009 Project SP-08-01093A Mr. Barry Jaeger Jaeger Construction, LLC 2317 Waters Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Re: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Eagan, Minnesota DearJaeger: Please find attached to this procedural report the Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Woodcrest Church addition in Eagan, Minnesota, and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and/or the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Plans and Specifications The provided plans and specifications or the plans available at the site were used for our inspections. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Jaeger Construction, LLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 Page 2 Summary of Special Inspections and Material Observations and Tests Soil Evaluation and Testing In 2008, our firm conducted a geotechnical evaluation for the Woodcrest Church addition. Three standard penetration test borings were performed for the evaluation. The borings initially encountered about 9 to 11 feet of existing comprised of clay. Below the existing fill, two of the borings encountered a 2-foot thick layer of buried topsoil. Below the buried topsoil, and elsewhere below the existing fill, the borings encountered and terminated in glacial soils comprised of sand, silty and clay. The reports indicated that groundwater surface should be considered to be at elevation 914 for design purposes. Addendum 1 to the Geotechnical Evaluation Report addressed the design and installation of a subfloor drainage system for the basement slab-on-grade. Soils exposed at structure subgrade elevations and in excavations were visually evaluated, while those below subgrade elevations and excavation bottoms were evaluated using hand auger borings, dynamic cone penetrometers and/or static cone penetrometers. These tasks were performed to determine if the observed and tested soils were consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical borings performed for the project, and suitable for support of the design structural loads. The hand auger borings were drilled with a 1 1/2-inch-diameter hand auger. The borings were advanced in 2- to 4-inch increments to depths of 2 to 4 feet below subgrade elevations or excavation bottoms (shallower penetrations typically occurred where larger gravel, cobbles and boulders were present). The auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings. The soils encountered in the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance to penetration of the hand auger, and the turning resistance. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests were completed using a solid metal rod fitted with a 13/8-inch diameter conical point. The point is driven into the soil with a 10-pound weight falling 24 inches. The number of blows required to drive the point each 6-inch increment was recorded and then used to correlate the soils' relative density, consistency or compaction with that determined or estimated from the geotechnical borings, and also used as a basis to estimate the suitability of the soils to support the design loads. This test procedure was generally used when granular soils were exposed at subgrade elevations or in excavation bottoms. Concrete Reinforcement We initially reviewed the reinforcement and dowel requirements on the project structural drawings and shop drawings, if available. Information reviewed included bar size, bar length, bar spacing, bar location, splice lengths and dowel placement. This information was then used to determine in the inplace reinforcement was placed in accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. We also noted if the inplace reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil. Concrete Placement Observations Concrete placement observations were performed to monitor the procedures being used by the contractor and to determine if they were consistent with typical industry standards. I NT RTEC Jaeger Construction, LLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 Page 3 Fresh Concrete Testing Routine tests to determine the plastic concrete's slump, temperature and air content were done during each pour. In addition, concrete cylinders were cast at rates specified in the project specifications to evaluate the concrete's compressive strength. Concrete Compressive Strength Testing The cast concrete cylinders were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for moist curing and testing. The results of the concrete compressive strength testing were forwarded to the interested parties under a separate cover as they became available. Masonry Construction Observations Prior to conducting the observations, the special inspector reviewed the construction documents and any associated approved submittals. As construction began, the proportions of the site prepared mortar, construction of mortar joints and the location of reinforcement and connectors was observed for compliance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in addition to the type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry to structural members, frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the specified size, grade and type of reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in compliance with the guidelines of the IBC. Prior to grouting, the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors, proportions of site-prepared grout and construction of mortar joints were observed. Concrete Masonry Prism Testing The hollow core masonry prisms were cast by the contractor and tested in general accordance with ASTM C1314: Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the masonry prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available. Concrete Masonry Grout Testing The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C1019: Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Grout. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the grout prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available. INTERTEC Jaeger Construction, LLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 Page 4 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Joel Kurpius at 651.487.7006. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Jess L. Gamst ICC Sp 'al Inspector Joel C urpius, PE Reviewing Engineer Attachment: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Mr. Dale Ronning, City of Eagan Mr. Christopher Plessel, BKBM Engineers Mr. Mark Pope, RLP Architects, Inc. SP0801093A I NTE RTEC Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 2 City of: Eagan Date: February 3, 2009 Attention: Dale Ronning Project: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Road Braun Intertec Project: SP-08-01093A In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, the required special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Soils The required testing in the field and laboratory has been completed. The compaction testing done during placement of backfill and additional required fill indicated the procedures used by the contractor were adequate to compact thebackfill and fill, and meet the project requirements. Observations and testing of the structure subgrades and excavation bottoms indicated that the exposed soils were consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical borings performed for this project, and were capable of supporting a net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,500 pounds per square foot. There are no outstanding or unresolved soils-related issues. Concrete The required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed. The results have been forwarded under separate cover. The compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has met the project requirements. The placement procedures used were judged to have met the project requirements. There are no outstanding or unresolved concrete-related issues. Reinforcing Steel The reinforcement placement detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports was observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are no outstanding or unresolved reinforcing steel-related issues. Structural Masonry Construction The required structural masonry observations and testing detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports have been completed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Following the required corrections, the structural masonry construction was found acceptable. There are no outstanding or unresolved structural masonry-related issues. 1 a Jaeger Construction, LLC Project SP-08-01093A February 3, 2009 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections performed, the testing completed and the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was my direct supervision and that am a duly Licensed under Professional Engineer :b 0^, :G•KV O/(~~~i,, under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ';r S : UCENSEO • PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER • Joel C. urpius, PE el X10 Project Engineer eier0 1111RI O License Number: 43523 Attachments: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 12 SP0801093A INTERTEC Envelope Compliance Report COMrheck.i Software Vetslon 2.1 Relegsc I Minnttsota Commorolal Code Sdition Section a : Project information Project 1nibrmadon: ADATTION TO WOODCp, T CIiURCH EAG, MN. Owner/Agent l,atbrmation: RLP ARCHI 1sCT$ INC, 2243 FARRINCTON CIRCLE ROSEVILLE, MN. PHONE: 651-631-1767 Document Author: FAX: 651-484-3373 Date: Section 2: General information Bultdipg Locaricm: Mltma9sota Climate Tate; I 6 Hosting Degree Days (be" 1$5 degrees F): 7981 Ceo ling begrae Days (base 61 degrees fry M Building Use Method of Compliance; Whole Building McIhod ~ f Ybla~a~li,~ltlOStt2 EWw_Am EWw1.&Ot)T•25I000 Ift2 15%0 P,cgiuct' Description (check one): _ New C.onstntction &AeauWion _•Alteration _ Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Requirements ChecINst Asir Leakage, Compwwtttn Certti'badon, and Vxpuc Retartler .Requiseiieno Inspection Approved Initial All ,joints and pcncuations are caulked gaatae4 Date (WN) weather-stripped, in othen*'tse vowed Windows, doors, and skylights Geri icd as incetittg tcakagc requirements Component R-values; & U-factotrs labeled as certified Vapor retarder installed Ed WdS@ : b@ 8@0Z ZT -un f 9'06-@82--29L : 'ON Xdd I2O t ueoy0aW S n : WOa-. cj COMcheck Software Version 3.5"3 Interior Lighting Application Worksheet 90.1 (2004) Standard Report Date: Data filename: P:1Current Projects\woodcrest churchleleccUntitled.cck Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts (ft2) Watts / ff2 (B x C) Common Space Types:Classroom/Lecture/Training 16297 1.4 22816 Total Allowed Wafts = 22816 Section 2: Proposed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D E Fixture ID : Description I Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp I Ballast Lamps! # of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. Common Space Types.Classroom/Lecture/Training (16297 sq.ft ) Linear Fluorescent 1: BA: TOILET WALL WRAP / 48"T8 32W / Electronic 2 4 65 260 Linear Fluorescent 2:143: 2X4 INDIRECT/DIRECT! 48" T8 32W1 Electronic 3 53 95 5035 Compact Fluorescent 1: DF: FLUOR DOWNLIGHT / Quad 2-pin 26W / 1 8 27 216 Electronic Linear Fluorescent 3: P43: 2X4 PARABOLIC / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 3 88 95 8360 Linear Fluorescent 4: S4: 4' STRIP / 48" T8 32W if Electronic 2 5 65 325 Linear Fluorescent 5: W42: 4' WRAP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 2 65 130 Linear Fluorescent 6: L44: 2X4 TROFFER 148" T8 32W / Electronic 4 7 124 868 Linear Fluorescent 7: L22: 2X2 TROFFER / 24" TSU 32W / Electronic 2 2 62 124 Linear Fluorescent 8: P22: 2X2 PARABOLIC /24" T8U 32W/ Electronic 2 15 62 930 Incandescent 1: PIT: PIT LIGHT/ Incandescent 100W 1 1 100 100 4 400 1600 Incandescent 2: T8: TRACK / Incandescent 100W 4 Total Proposed Watts = 17948 Section 3: Compliance Calculation If the Total Allowed Wafts minus the Total Proposed Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 22816 Total Proposed Watts = 17948 Project Compliance = 4868 COMcheck Software Version 3.5.3 Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate 90.1 (2004) Standard Report Date: 06/27/08 Data filename: P:\Current Projects\woodcrest church\elec\Unttled.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Type: Addition Project Title : WOODCREST CHURCH GENERATIONS WING ADDITION Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 525 Clift Road Jaeger Construction Kevin Kuehn Eagon, MN Jaeger Construction Collins Electrical Co. 2317 Waters Drive 278 State Street Mendota Heights, MN St. Paul, MN 55107 651-255-0168 Section 2: Exterior Lighting Area/Surface Power Calculation A B C D E F Exterior Area/Surface Quantity Allowed Tradable Allowed Proposed Watts Wattage Watts Watts !Unit (CxD) Parking area(s) 14000 ft2 0.15 Yes 2100 1395 Attached canopy 8 112 1.25 Yes 10 88 Illuminated length of wall or surface 100 ft 5 No 500 125 Total Tradable Watts* = 2110 1483 Total Allowed Watts = 2610 Total Allowed Supplemental Watts" = 130 * Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areastsurfaces. A supplemental allowance equal to 5% of t )tal allowed wattage may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces. Section 3: Exterior Lighting Fixture Schedule A B C D E Fixture ID : Description / Lamp I Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Lamps/ # of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. Parking area(s) (14000 ft2): TradaklleWaltaape HID 1: XP1: 400W POLE MTND FIX / High-Pressure Sodium 400W / Electronic 1 1 465 465 HID 2: XP2: (2) 400W POLE MTND / Metal Halide 400W / Electronic 2 1 930 930 Attached.canop (8 ft2) Tradai 1P 4Wattafie HID 5: XD: DOWN LIGHT / Metal Halide 70W / Electronic 1 1 88 88 #1(tun:nate~d length of v„{ or sinrf c4100ft):.t [on-f aft HID 6: XWP: WALL PACK ! Ceramic Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 1 125 125 Total Tradable Proposed Watts 1483 p. d every 1 m Z m E m E m aa~ m S~ E 4 E k m m ~ E E E m Ee q m E m E E' l-K m m m E ~ E E E m m ~ m 9 ul 91 IF, R! 3-5 Uffil o~ ge3 3a lad gg `a' rZ Pll WOODCREST CHURCH 525 CLIFF ROAD if PC, EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 z °9c 9 City of Eaali TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Alike Ridley, Planning I4ale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tim Colbert, Engineering ?John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering X m Struve, Maintenance c Macbeth, Maintenance vdregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: /Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: 5/08/2008 RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Rd. f~r° i 7- The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ? ? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes El No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 4? City of Eaaall TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 ? Mike Ridley, Planning s/Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering ?John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering X m Struve, Maintenance c Macbeth, Maintenance ?Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 16, 2008 RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition (Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ? Yes ? No Park Dedication ? Yes ? No Trail Dedication ? Yes ? No Tree Dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised } ~e~o City of Eaaau N TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering ,/John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: 5/08/2008 RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Rd. f/f r 4X,,,- The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: 09 - i11-i oe vw Is-1.s 071, c,+- Cc~~y ?r) c --tit -p -arc' ~oyrtl~ ih ';.s`2 aTf Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. lYo Y;rrlu~,oT lei Amount ? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ? ? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes ? No tree dedication ? Yes No PRV Required Si ature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 X 4 City of Eaaali TO: Scott Peterson, Building -Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 16, 2008 RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition (Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: r--t S~ e fe t/i :5A ee f 4'- t' Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ? Yes ? No Park Dedication ? Yes ? No Trail Dedication ? Yes ? No Tree Dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required 7-17-~3 'gnature Date CD/Bldg lnsp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised City of Eaaali TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance I3regg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community. Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: 5/08/2008 RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Rd. F/F jt-- The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ? ? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes )L No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required Signature -Date CDBldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 r J City of Eaaali Mello TO: Scott-Peterson, -Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 16, 2008 RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition (Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit-be held; please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ? Yes ? No Park Dedication ? Yes No Trail Dedication ? Yes No Tree Dedication El Yes El V Required o Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms// ommercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised 17 SOOZ ! g inf a y Z7 Y11 FpVtA Imo City of EaQali TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 VMike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: 5/08/2008 RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Chuf ch Addition 525 Cliff Rd. F/F p ii,r The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: F/F ?~~Vl -1-f se46a-CJ- D k ,Y ~QU,rre -cuf i~ e~ vn t v n SCE rr~ S CX ~2.'yt.-' h 61 rU 0-c- O Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount [I Yes No landscape security required Z o n i n g? ? Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ' No park dedication ? Yes No trail dedication ? Yes No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required WOID;~ Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 I-NJ cto V DEG S.Q- ~ ~S 3 3~' of~ a-cam R City of Eaaali ma - TO: ScottPeterson, Building Inspections #-37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 16, 2008 RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church-,Addition (Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd The plans are in our plan review section for-your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments withi-n-7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permitbe held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me.y Comments: )JaL ,1~7,6,.e -V Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes X No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ? Yes No Park Dedication ? Yes No Trail Dedication ? Yes No Tree Dedication ? No PRV Re uired .--7 tzLw 1:, U - Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised 77 0 City of Eaali Me~o TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning /Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector DATE: 5/08/2008 RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Rd. ,/F filer' The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ? ? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes ? No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07 MeMo City of Eaaafl -TO~- - - -Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 16, 2008 RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition (Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Commen h,40,Z,01'0, ti )0,~~00 o r c / C G / 7 20/DS Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ? Yes ? No Park Dedication ? Yes ? No Trail Dedication ? Yes ? No Tree Dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required Signature Date CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised AMkbh City of Eaaali Me TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37 Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal Tom Colbert, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tom Struve, Maintenance ./Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Jim McDonald, Police Department Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector Sarah Brandel, Community Development FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Ins or RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition 525 Cliff Rd. F/P / AGOG- The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ? ? Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size ? Yes ? No park dedication ? Yes ? No trail dedication ? Yes ? No tree dedication ? Yes ? No PRV Required X2310 4~", - Signat re Date CD/Bldg lnsp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07