525 Cliff Rd - Correspondence re: BL84696
B~~ Peg- IIT 8 624
City of Eaafl
Mike Maguire May 12, 2008
MAYOR
Paul Bakken Barry Jaeger
Jaeger Construction
Peggy Carlson 2317 Waters Dr
Cyndee Fields Eagan, MN 55120
Meg Tilley
COUNCIL MEMBERS RE: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Thomas Hedges Dear Barry:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of
obtaining a building permit for the above-referenced project. This review is not
intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all
references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in
complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the
following items be addressed. Please provide these items to that the City may
MUNICIPAL CENTER complete your plan review:
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1810 1. 2 sets of Civil Plans (ie: site, grading, erosion, and utility)
651.675.5000 phone 2. 1 SAC Determination letter from MCES
651.675.5012 fax 3. 2 sets of Landscaping Plans
651.454.8535 TDD 4. 1 set of Energy Calculations (signed)
5. 1 Electric Power & Lighting form (enclosed)
6. 1 Emergency Response Site Plan (example enclosed)
MAINTENANCE FACILITY 7. Fire Stopping submittals
3501 coachman Point 8. Fire Protection System plan review information (form enclosed)
Eagan, MN 55122
651.675.5300 phone If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at (651) 675-5683.
651.675.5360 fax Sincerely,
651.454.8535 TDD
6
Craig Novaczyk www.cityofeagan.com Senior Building Inspector
Cc: Mark Pope, RLP Architects Inc, 2443 Farrington Circle, Roseville, MN 55113
Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official
Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works
JohnAGorder 410"Wt City Engineer
THE LONE OAK TREE
The symbol of
strength and growth
in our community. I
City of Eaaali
Mike Maguire May 28, 2008
MAYOR
Barry Jaeger
Paul Bakken Jaeger Construction
Peggy Carlson 2317 Waters Dr
Cyndee Fields Eagan, MN 55120
Meg Tilley
COUNCIL MEMBERS RE: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Thomas Hedges Dear Barry:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
We have completed our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of
obtaining a building permit for the above-referenced project. This review is not
intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all
references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in
complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the
following items be addressed:
MUNICIPAL CENTER
3830 Pilot Knob Road 1.
Eagan, MN 55122-1810 a) Guards for stairs B.6 shall comply with Section 1013.2 (2006 IBC).
651.675.5000 phone Reference detail 4, A-9 of your plan.
651.675.5012 fax b) Provide revised details for guards and graspable hand railings.
651.454.8535 TDD 2. Provide guard and hand railing details for stair B-15, include a detail for the
guard protecting the opening to below.
3. Provide an elevation detail for the reception counter (the desk by owner note
MAINTENANCE FACILITY does not exclude the need for a detail).
4. Provide details for the recommended under slab drainage system mentioned in
3501 Coachman Point paragraph C.4 of the Soils Report.
Eagan, MN 55122
651.675.5300 phone If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at (651) 675-5683.
651.675.5360 fax
651.454.8535 TDD Sincerely,
Craig Novaczyk
www.cityofeagan.com Senior Building Inspector
Cc: Mark Pope, RLP Architects Inc, 2443 Farrington Circle, Roseville, MN 55113
Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official
THE LONE OAK TREE
The symbol of
strength and growth
in our community.
06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 02/04
City of Eagan
Fire Protection System
Plan Review Information
Incomplete Information WILL delay the processing of your building permit,
Date:
Street Address 525 Cliff Road, Eagan, M
Facility Name: Woodcrest Church
Approx. Start Date: Approx. Completion Date.
Month
Year Month Year
Li/C- Sprinkler Contractor / ~PL License COs 7
Street Address: ~c G3S ( h w~ /o
City: ~X + ?Q f State: Zip Code: ______n
Designer: Phone 7 Fax -7~.? --5!`t~/-
Building Code Occupancy Classification (MSBC Chapter 3)
A: 01 ?2 X3 04 05 B: ID E: 0 F: 01 02 H. ?1 ?2 ?3 04 ?5
I: 01 LJZ LJ3 04 M.0 K.u i L_JL 0.5 LJ4 . U1 Liz U; LJ
Building Code Construction Classification (MSBC Chapter 6)
I: ?A ?B It: DIA OB III: DA 08 IV: ?A 08 V: DA ®B
Approx. bldB• footprint (sf): No. levels (incl. bsmt.) Approx. # of heads: /3
Briefly describe the primary use of this building: CA tiL
~ Sprinkler System Design Basis
Briefl describe the scope of work: 1Zrs1 Cj _ LIN',/
r
k13 ?-13R 013D Edition: 01999 02002 ?Other NFPA:
0 Insurance Co. (attach letter) ? Partial system (attach Code Official letter)
? Code variance? Explain:
'Check this box -i ? acknowledging that 13R is the applicable standard as no other building credits (i.e. height, area,
~cess) have been applied to this facility. Verify with the architect or builder. Failure to provide this acknowledgment
.r a 13R design may delay this plan review and permission to commence work on the project.
• 06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 03/04
• DRernote Station or Central Station Monitoring will be provided for this system (>20 new heads,>100 new/existing heads)
Water Supply;1 Public Main DFire Pump*(rated capacity Pressure; ) DTank/Reservoir:
(•If supply is from a fire pump, p, provide factory test curve or latest field narformanca tPCt a»ri InrlirQto driver h.po.)
Date of Test: Location:
Static Pressure: psi Residual Pressure: psi Flow: gpm
Size of Main To Bldg: in. Combined W/Domestic?D Y iD N Size: in. Solenoid Provided? 0 Y 0 N
System Type: Wet 0 Dry 0 Preaction 0 Deluge
Sprinkler Sys in Design Criteria
Description of Hazard Area/Density' .Reference Notes
Area Ciafsification 7 of stem or Other Basis.-. ..,Sections
rem A1n', ~~e o47
e ]
• Miscellaneous storage as defined in NFPA 13 applies to this occupancy. DY JRN
• Is the roof slope greater than 2 Inches in 12 Inches? DY M.N If yes, roof slope is;
• Flammable/comb. liquid use or storage: DY ON If yes, detail information below
• Aerosol storage DY ~N if yes, detail information below
• Hazardous material use or storage DY k N If yes, detail information below
• Plastic manufacture or storage DY ON If yes, detail Information below
• High-pled/rack storage (>12 ft) DY (N If yes, complete page 3 for HPS
Detail of hazard(s):
I have completed the information on this form accurately and to the best of my knowledge. If the design and/or Scope of Work changes
from that which is represented here, r will notify the City of Eagan's Building Inspections Division In a timely manner. I have read and
understand Minnesota Statute 299M regarding Fire Protection Licensing and the enaitles for providing Use information.
Printed Name Signature
'ail address: LO ~i lJ( r~ ~S '`r~~ . Cor
06/27/2008 07:16 7634415010 BROTHERS FIRE PAGE 04/04
WA High-Piled & Rack Storage (HIPS)
High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials in closely packed piles or combustible materials on pallets, in
racks or on shelves, where the top of storage is greater than 12 feet in height- It also Includes certain high-hazard
commodities such as rubber tires; group-A plastics, flammable liquids, Idle pallets, and other such commodities where the
top of storage is greater than 6 feet in height. N Stage Fire Code (03) Section 2302.11.
Check all that apply
o„r.,l r;i.,,i 1)1' 1714 M01-N 01n ayc. Ol Dr' vv000 raaec: U C UN Flastit Pallet: ?Y ON
Solid Shelf OY ON Single Row: DY ON Double Row: DY ON Multiple Row: DY ON
Bin-Box: DY ON Encapsulated: OY ON Storage height: Roof height:
Aisle Width: ft. Transverse Flue Space: in. Longitudinal Flue Space: in.
? Class I Commodity (Describe):
ArealDensity: Section/Figure/Curve:
? Class It Commodity (Describe):
Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve:
? Class III Commodity (Describe):
Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve:
? Class IV Commodity (Describe):
Area/Density: Section/Figure/Curve:
*If storage contains limited amounts of Group-A plastics in mixed quantities, state the overall commodity classification
from Fig. 2303.7.4 (2003 MSFC.)
Protection induces: OStd. Sprinklers OELO ?Large Drop DESFR Din-rack sprinklers
Additional Notes:
G.-/Bldg Insp/Perrnltnpps/Flrc Proteofon System Plan Review-Comm Form
Construction Materials Testing and
Observations Final Report
Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Prepared for
Jaeger Construction, LLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
RECEIVED
Braun Intertec Corporation
FEB 0 6 2009
EAGAN
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BRAUN Braun tnterfee Corporation Phone: 651.487.3245
I NTE RTEC 1826 Buerkle Road Fax: 651.487.1812
Saint Paul, MN 551 10 Web: brounintertec.com
February 3, 2009 Project SP-08-01093A
Mr. Barry Jaeger
Jaeger Construction, LLC
525 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Re: Construction Materials Testing and Observations Final Report
Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Jaeger:
We appreciate the opportunity to provide construction materials testing and observation services for the
Woodcrest Church addition in Eagan, Minnesota. Please find attached to this letter the following
documents.
¦ Non-Structural Steel Special Inspections Final Report and
Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 12
¦ Addendum 1 to Geotechnical Evaluation
• Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Results, Sets 1 through 9
¦ Moisture Density Relationship Test Results (ASTM D 698), Proctor P-1 and P-2
¦ Field Compaction Test Results, Tests 1 through 22
¦ Daily Field Notes, Reports 1 through 16
¦ Masonry Block Net Area Determination
¦ Compressive Strength Masonry Prisms, Set 1
If you have any questions or require additional information, please call Joel Kurpius at 651.487.7006.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Joel C. Kurpius, PE
Project Engineer
SP0801093A
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
li t
Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection
Final Report
Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Prepared for
Jaeger Construction, PLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
Braun Intertec Corporation
BRAUN Braun lntertec Corporation Phone: 651.487.3245
NTE RTE 1826 Buerkle Road Fax: 651.487.18 12
Saint Paul, MN 55110 Web: braunintertec.com
February 3, 2009 Project SP-08-01093A
Mr. Barry Jaeger
Jaeger Construction, LLC
2317 Waters Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Re: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal
Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
DearJaeger:
Please find attached to this procedural report the Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for
the Woodcrest Church addition in Eagan, Minnesota, and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports
for your review and records.
Special Inspection and Testing Procedures
The special inspection services were in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the
International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and/or the project plans
and specifications.
The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the
project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine
compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the
responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the
construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this.
As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize
the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site
representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or
discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted.
Plans and Specifications
The provided plans and specifications or the plans available at the site were used for our inspections.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Jaeger Construction, LLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
Page 2
Summary of Special Inspections and Material Observations and Tests
Soil Evaluation and Testing
In 2008, our firm conducted a geotechnical evaluation for the Woodcrest Church addition. Three standard
penetration test borings were performed for the evaluation. The borings initially encountered about 9 to
11 feet of existing comprised of clay. Below the existing fill, two of the borings encountered a 2-foot thick
layer of buried topsoil. Below the buried topsoil, and elsewhere below the existing fill, the borings
encountered and terminated in glacial soils comprised of sand, silty and clay. The reports indicated that
groundwater surface should be considered to be at elevation 914 for design purposes.
Addendum 1 to the Geotechnical Evaluation Report addressed the design and installation of a subfloor
drainage system for the basement slab-on-grade.
Soils exposed at structure subgrade elevations and in excavations were visually evaluated, while those
below subgrade elevations and excavation bottoms were evaluated using hand auger borings, dynamic
cone penetrometers and/or static cone penetrometers. These tasks were performed to determine if the
observed and tested soils were consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical borings performed
for the project, and suitable for support of the design structural loads.
The hand auger borings were drilled with a 1 1/2-inch-diameter hand auger. The borings were advanced in
2- to 4-inch increments to depths of 2 to 4 feet below subgrade elevations or excavation bottoms
(shallower penetrations typically occurred where larger gravel, cobbles and boulders were present). The
auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings. The soils encountered in the borings were
classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual
Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance
to penetration of the hand auger, and the turning resistance.
The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests were completed using a solid metal rod fitted with a 13/8-inch
diameter conical point. The point is driven into the soil with a 10-pound weight falling 24 inches. The
number of blows required to drive the point each 6-inch increment was recorded and then used to
correlate the soils' relative density, consistency or compaction with that determined or estimated from the
geotechnical borings, and also used as a basis to estimate the suitability of the soils to support the design
loads. This test procedure was generally used when granular soils were exposed at subgrade elevations or
in excavation bottoms.
Concrete Reinforcement
We initially reviewed the reinforcement and dowel requirements on the project structural drawings and
shop drawings, if available. Information reviewed included bar size, bar length, bar spacing, bar location,
splice lengths and dowel placement. This information was then used to determine in the inplace
reinforcement was placed in accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.
We also noted if the inplace reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil.
Concrete Placement Observations
Concrete placement observations were performed to monitor the procedures being used by the
contractor and to determine if they were consistent with typical industry standards.
I NT RTEC
Jaeger Construction, LLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
Page 3
Fresh Concrete Testing
Routine tests to determine the plastic concrete's slump, temperature and air content were done during
each pour. In addition, concrete cylinders were cast at rates specified in the project specifications to
evaluate the concrete's compressive strength.
Concrete Compressive Strength Testing
The cast concrete cylinders were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for
moist curing and testing. The results of the concrete compressive strength testing were forwarded to the
interested parties under a separate cover as they became available.
Masonry Construction Observations
Prior to conducting the observations, the special inspector reviewed the construction documents and any
associated approved submittals. As construction began, the proportions of the site prepared mortar,
construction of mortar joints and the location of reinforcement and connectors was observed for
compliance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.
The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in addition to
the type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry to structural
members, frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the specified size, grade
and type of reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in compliance with the
guidelines of the IBC.
Prior to grouting, the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors,
proportions of site-prepared grout and construction of mortar joints were observed.
Concrete Masonry Prism Testing
The hollow core masonry prisms were cast by the contractor and tested in general accordance with
ASTM C1314: Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. The samples were temporarily
stored at the site and returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the
compressive strengths of the masonry prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate
cover as they became available.
Concrete Masonry Grout Testing
The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C1019: Standard Test Method for
Sampling and Testing Grout. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our
laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the grout
prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available.
INTERTEC
Jaeger Construction, LLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
Page 4
General
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No
warranty, express or implied, is made.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After
review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional
information, please call Joel Kurpius at 651.487.7006.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Jess L. Gamst
ICC Sp 'al Inspector
Joel C urpius, PE
Reviewing Engineer
Attachment:
Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report
c: Mr. Dale Ronning, City of Eagan
Mr. Christopher Plessel, BKBM Engineers
Mr. Mark Pope, RLP Architects, Inc.
SP0801093A
I NTE RTEC
Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 2
City of: Eagan Date: February 3, 2009
Attention: Dale Ronning
Project: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Road
Braun Intertec Project: SP-08-01093A
In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of
services, the required special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items:
Soils
The required testing in the field and laboratory has been completed. The compaction testing done
during placement of backfill and additional required fill indicated the procedures used by the contractor
were adequate to compact thebackfill and fill, and meet the project requirements. Observations and
testing of the structure subgrades and excavation bottoms indicated that the exposed soils were
consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical borings performed for this project, and were
capable of supporting a net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,500 pounds per square foot. There are
no outstanding or unresolved soils-related issues.
Concrete
The required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed. The results have been
forwarded under separate cover. The compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has
met the project requirements. The placement procedures used were judged to have met the project
requirements. There are no outstanding or unresolved concrete-related issues.
Reinforcing Steel
The reinforcement placement detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports was observed
according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are no outstanding or
unresolved reinforcing steel-related issues.
Structural Masonry Construction
The required structural masonry observations and testing detailed in the attached Special Inspection
Daily Reports have been completed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans
and specifications. Following the required corrections, the structural masonry construction was found
acceptable. There are no outstanding or unresolved structural masonry-related issues.
1 a
Jaeger Construction, LLC
Project SP-08-01093A
February 3, 2009
Page 2
Conclusion
Based upon the inspections performed, the testing completed and the attached Special Inspection Daily
Reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was
performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable
workmanship provisions of the International Building Code.
Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was
my direct supervision
and that am a duly Licensed under
Professional Engineer :b 0^,
:G•KV O/(~~~i,,
under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ';r
S : UCENSEO •
PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER
•
Joel C. urpius, PE el X10
Project Engineer eier0 1111RI O
License Number: 43523
Attachments:
Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 12
SP0801093A
INTERTEC
Envelope Compliance Report
COMrheck.i Software Vetslon 2.1 Relegsc I
Minnttsota Commorolal Code Sdition
Section a : Project information
Project 1nibrmadon: ADATTION TO WOODCp, T CIiURCH
EAG, MN.
Owner/Agent l,atbrmation: RLP ARCHI 1sCT$ INC,
2243 FARRINCTON CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, MN.
PHONE: 651-631-1767
Document Author: FAX: 651-484-3373
Date:
Section 2: General information
Bultdipg Locaricm: Mltma9sota
Climate Tate; I 6
Hosting Degree Days (be" 1$5 degrees F): 7981
Ceo ling begrae Days (base 61 degrees fry M
Building Use Method of Compliance; Whole Building McIhod
~
f
Ybla~a~li,~ltlOStt2
EWw_Am
EWw1.&Ot)T•25I000 Ift2 15%0
P,cgiuct' Description (check one):
_ New C.onstntction &AeauWion _•Alteration _ Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit)
Section 3: Requirements ChecINst
Asir Leakage, Compwwtttn Certti'badon, and Vxpuc Retartler .Requiseiieno
Inspection Approved Initial
All ,joints and pcncuations are caulked gaatae4 Date (WN)
weather-stripped, in othen*'tse vowed
Windows, doors, and skylights Geri icd
as incetittg tcakagc requirements
Component R-values; & U-factotrs labeled as certified
Vapor retarder installed
Ed WdS@ : b@ 8@0Z ZT -un f 9'06-@82--29L : 'ON Xdd I2O t ueoy0aW S n : WOa-.
cj COMcheck Software Version 3.5"3
Interior Lighting Application
Worksheet
90.1 (2004) Standard
Report Date:
Data filename: P:1Current Projects\woodcrest churchleleccUntitled.cck
Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation
A B C D
Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts
(ft2) Watts / ff2 (B x C)
Common Space Types:Classroom/Lecture/Training 16297 1.4 22816
Total Allowed Wafts = 22816
Section 2: Proposed Lighting Power Calculation
A B C D E
Fixture ID : Description I Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp I Ballast Lamps! # of Fixture (C X D)
Fixture Fixtures Watt.
Common Space Types.Classroom/Lecture/Training (16297 sq.ft )
Linear Fluorescent 1: BA: TOILET WALL WRAP / 48"T8 32W / Electronic 2 4 65 260
Linear Fluorescent 2:143: 2X4 INDIRECT/DIRECT! 48" T8 32W1 Electronic 3 53 95 5035
Compact Fluorescent 1: DF: FLUOR DOWNLIGHT / Quad 2-pin 26W / 1 8 27 216
Electronic
Linear Fluorescent 3: P43: 2X4 PARABOLIC / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 3 88 95 8360
Linear Fluorescent 4: S4: 4' STRIP / 48" T8 32W if Electronic 2 5 65 325
Linear Fluorescent 5: W42: 4' WRAP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 2 65 130
Linear Fluorescent 6: L44: 2X4 TROFFER 148" T8 32W / Electronic 4 7 124 868
Linear Fluorescent 7: L22: 2X2 TROFFER / 24" TSU 32W / Electronic 2 2 62 124
Linear Fluorescent 8: P22: 2X2 PARABOLIC /24" T8U 32W/ Electronic 2 15 62 930
Incandescent 1: PIT: PIT LIGHT/ Incandescent 100W 1 1 100 100
4 400 1600
Incandescent 2: T8: TRACK / Incandescent 100W 4
Total Proposed Watts = 17948
Section 3: Compliance Calculation
If the Total Allowed Wafts minus the Total Proposed Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies.
Total Allowed Watts = 22816
Total Proposed Watts = 17948
Project Compliance = 4868
COMcheck Software Version 3.5.3
Exterior Lighting Compliance
Certificate
90.1 (2004) Standard
Report Date: 06/27/08
Data filename: P:\Current Projects\woodcrest church\elec\Unttled.cck
Section 1: Project Information
Project Type: Addition
Project Title : WOODCREST CHURCH GENERATIONS WING ADDITION
Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor:
525 Clift Road Jaeger Construction Kevin Kuehn
Eagon, MN Jaeger Construction Collins Electrical Co.
2317 Waters Drive 278 State Street
Mendota Heights, MN St. Paul, MN 55107
651-255-0168
Section 2: Exterior Lighting Area/Surface Power Calculation
A B C D E F
Exterior Area/Surface Quantity Allowed Tradable Allowed Proposed
Watts Wattage Watts Watts
!Unit (CxD)
Parking area(s) 14000 ft2 0.15 Yes 2100 1395
Attached canopy 8 112 1.25 Yes 10 88
Illuminated length of wall or surface 100 ft 5 No 500 125
Total Tradable Watts* = 2110 1483
Total Allowed Watts = 2610
Total Allowed Supplemental Watts" = 130
* Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areastsurfaces.
A supplemental allowance equal to 5% of t )tal allowed wattage may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable
areas/surfaces.
Section 3: Exterior Lighting Fixture Schedule
A B C D E
Fixture ID : Description / Lamp I Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Lamps/ # of Fixture (C X D)
Fixture Fixtures Watt.
Parking area(s) (14000 ft2): TradaklleWaltaape
HID 1: XP1: 400W POLE MTND FIX / High-Pressure Sodium 400W / Electronic 1 1 465 465
HID 2: XP2: (2) 400W POLE MTND / Metal Halide 400W / Electronic 2 1 930 930
Attached.canop (8 ft2) Tradai 1P 4Wattafie
HID 5: XD: DOWN LIGHT / Metal Halide 70W / Electronic 1 1 88 88
#1(tun:nate~d length of v„{ or sinrf c4100ft):.t [on-f aft
HID 6: XWP: WALL PACK ! Ceramic Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 1 125 125
Total Tradable Proposed Watts 1483
p. d every
1
m Z
m E m E
m
aa~ m
S~ E
4 E k
m m ~
E E
E m Ee q
m E m
E E'
l-K
m m m
E ~ E
E E
m m ~ m
9 ul 91 IF, R!
3-5
Uffil
o~ ge3
3a lad
gg
`a'
rZ
Pll
WOODCREST CHURCH
525 CLIFF ROAD if
PC, EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 z °9c 9
City of Eaali
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Alike Ridley, Planning
I4ale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tim Colbert, Engineering
?John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
X m Struve, Maintenance
c Macbeth, Maintenance
vdregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
FROM: /Craig Novaczyk, Inspector
DATE: 5/08/2008
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Rd. f~r° i 7-
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ?
? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes El No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07
4?
City of Eaaall
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
? Mike Ridley, Planning
s/Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
?John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
X m Struve, Maintenance
c Macbeth, Maintenance
?Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector
DATE: July 16, 2008
RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition
(Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning:
? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size:
? Yes ? No Park Dedication
? Yes ? No Trail Dedication
? Yes ? No Tree Dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised
}
~e~o
City of Eaaau N
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
,/John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector
DATE: 5/08/2008
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Rd. f/f r 4X,,,-
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
09 - i11-i oe vw Is-1.s 071, c,+-
Cc~~y ?r) c --tit -p -arc' ~oyrtl~ ih ';.s`2 aTf
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
lYo Y;rrlu~,oT lei Amount
? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ?
? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes ? No tree dedication
? Yes No PRV Required
Si ature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07
X 4
City of Eaaali
TO: Scott Peterson, Building -Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector
DATE: July 16, 2008
RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition
(Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
r--t S~ e fe t/i :5A ee f 4'- t'
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning:
? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size:
? Yes ? No Park Dedication
? Yes ? No Trail Dedication
? Yes ? No Tree Dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
7-17-~3
'gnature Date
CD/Bldg lnsp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised
City of Eaaali
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
I3regg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community. Development
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector
DATE: 5/08/2008
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Rd. F/F jt--
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ?
? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes )L No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
Signature -Date
CDBldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07
r J
City of Eaaali Mello
TO: Scott-Peterson, -Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector
DATE: July 16, 2008
RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition
(Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit-be held; please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning:
? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size:
? Yes ? No Park Dedication
? Yes No Trail Dedication
? Yes No Tree Dedication
El Yes El V Required
o
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms// ommercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised
17 SOOZ ! g inf
a
y Z7 Y11
FpVtA
Imo
City of EaQali
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
VMike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector
DATE: 5/08/2008
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Chuf ch Addition
525 Cliff Rd. F/F p ii,r
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments: F/F ?~~Vl -1-f se46a-CJ- D k ,Y
~QU,rre -cuf i~ e~ vn t v n SCE rr~
S CX ~2.'yt.-' h 61 rU 0-c- O
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
[I Yes No landscape security required Z o n i n g?
? Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ' No park dedication
? Yes No trail dedication
? Yes No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
WOID;~
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07
I-NJ
cto
V
DEG S.Q- ~ ~S
3
3~' of~ a-cam
R
City of Eaaali ma -
TO: ScottPeterson, Building Inspections #-37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector
DATE: July 16, 2008
RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church-,Addition
(Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd
The plans are in our plan review section for-your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments withi-n-7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permitbe held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.y
Comments:
)JaL
,1~7,6,.e -V
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes X No Landscape Security Required Zoning:
? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size:
? Yes No Park Dedication
? Yes No Trail Dedication
? Yes No Tree Dedication
? No PRV Re uired
.--7
tzLw 1:, U -
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised
77 0 City of Eaali Me~o
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
/Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Inspector
DATE: 5/08/2008
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Rd. ,/F filer'
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit
be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ?
? Yes ? No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes ? No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07
MeMo
City of Eaaafl
-TO~- - - -Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
Peggy Fleck, Clerical Technician
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector
DATE: July 16, 2008
RE: Plan Review For Building Permit Only: Woodcrest Church Addition
(Footing & Foundation Permit Issued) 525 Cliff Rd
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Commen
h,40,Z,01'0, ti )0,~~00
o r c / C G / 7 20/DS
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No Landscape Security Required Zoning:
? Yes ? No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size:
? Yes ? No Park Dedication
? Yes ? No Trail Dedication
? Yes ? No Tree Dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
Signature Date
CD/Bldg Insp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For Revised
AMkbh
City of Eaaali Me
TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 37
Mike Ridley, Planning
Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal
Tom Colbert, Engineering
John Gorder, Engineering
Dave Westermayer, Engineering
Leon Weiland, Engineering
Tom Struve, Maintenance
./Eric Macbeth, Maintenance
Gregg Hove, Maintenance
Jim McDonald, Police Department
Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector
Sarah Brandel, Community Development
FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Ins or
RE: Plan Review For: Woodcrest Church Addition
525 Cliff Rd. F/P / AGOG-
The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment.
Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please
indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected
parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the
proper "hold request" form to me.
Comments:
Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit.
Amount
? Yes ? No landscape security required Z o n i n g ?
? Yes No water quality dedication Meter Size
? Yes ? No park dedication
? Yes ? No trail dedication
? Yes ? No tree dedication
? Yes ? No PRV Required
X2310
4~", -
Signat re Date
CD/Bldg lnsp/Forms//Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review For REVISED 2-07