The URL can be used to link to this page

3504 Dodd RdCITY OF EAGAN Addition K.S.I.P. Lot 1 Blk 1 Parcel 10 40950 010 00 Owner Y cJ: ?. Street }y' ^_LCt_ :C7 State Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK 1971 $336.00 16.80 20 SEWER LATERAL 1972 $2335.00 $116.75 I WATERMAIN WATER LATERAL 1972 & WATER AREA 1972 "$548.80 STORM SEW TRK STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC PARK CITY OF EAGAN Remarks Addition K.S.T.P. Lot 2 Blk Parcel 10 40950 020 00 Owner Street 3Oy i;)j State `12- f? Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK 1971 $30.45 20 SEWER LATERAL WATERMAIN WATER LATERAL WATER AREA 1972 _"94 70 $49-73 90 i STORM SEW TRK STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC PARK SPECL;L USE PEP,MIT EAGAN TCGNSHIP DiXC16 COUNTY, Minnesota The Board of Supervisors hereby grants to Sebamrman Trucking (:o. of Box 1B1. Inver Grove Iiots.. Minas.Special Use Permit pursuant to application dated April _7rgh2 for the following purposes: to n.-nrntn n trnn4ing +PT Jnnl nn thoir nrnnortg nn T.nta nno (l) Anti +%rn (i) in Ti ?; T P r AnIg nn nrcn of 2 ?, onraa lnnA+Afj nn Dated: gn? lqg? Fees Paid: $ 25.00 B C airman Attest: ? ,4 c, Clerk :? _Jb(C V Municipal Notice of Well Permit Application Dakota County Environmental Management Department Water and Land Management Section 14955 Galaxie Avenue West Apple Valley, MN 55124 Tel(612)891-7011 Fax(612)891-7031 DATE: July 27, 2000 TO: Tom Colbert/Wayne Schwanz - EM Fax #: (651) 681-4694 FROM: Water and Land Management RE: Well Permit #: 00-H169768 Municipality: Eagan Well Type: Sealed Environmental Specialist: Demuth The Water and Land Management Section of the Dakota County Environmental Management Department has received the following permit application for the well described. If you require further review of the application or if you have any questions or concerns about it, contact the Environmental Specialist listed above or our office at (612) 891-7011. If there is no response from your office within 24 HOURS (excluding weekends and holidays), we will assume that you have no objections to the issuance of the permit. Please note that permit issuance is always conditioned on the permit applicant's observance of and compliance with all applicable state, county, and municipal laws and codes. Well Contractor: Mark J Traut Wells Inc Date application received: July 26, 2000 Anticipated Drilling Date: Time: Anticipated Grouting Date: Time: Property Owner: West Publishing Co Well Owner: West Publishing Co WELL LOCATION: PLS Coordinates: SE 1/4, NE 1/4, SW 1/4, NE 1/4, Sec 13, Town 27, Range 23 Street address: 3504 Dodd Rd PIN Number: 10-40950-010-00 WELL INFORMATION: Diameter Casing depth: 350 Total depth: 395 Static Water Level: 115 Aquifer: COMMENTS: SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. SUITE 600 7300 WEST 147TH STREET APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-7580 (952) 432.3136 TELEFAX NUMBER (952) 432-3780 E-MAIL baueff@seversonsheldon.com TO: Russ Matthys, City Engineer p FROM: Robert B. Bauer, City Attorney /- Sl DATE: October 31, 2007 RE: Lots 1 and 2, KSTP ADDITION Easement No. 1159 Our File No. 206-4768 .SeL4-, /3 RECEIVED NOV 0 5 2001 EAGAN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Russ, Enclosed for the City's records, please find the original Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement dated October 1, 2007, and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's Office on October 11, 3007 as Document No. 2549869. '?..- ?A r ?l Af :. ' to j'.J\ b L k d Q f- N ?, J W N C N E ?-'- lfJ O T `o«O W V_ C w N O m O N Z Z K N 0 0 V O m O L ? //? c a o W O ' .. W ? ? / W U tr E 2• ` = N -i W 2 , y 7 d O .. N J O m C14 U m? ` ? o C) < w a y 0 7 O ip 12 N 0 oo° VE m N ?zn C) Z L A LL C) W W ? M d ? N N I? Q PERMANENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT !;r This permanent drainage and utility easement, made this / day of 2007, between West Publishing Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Landowner", and the City of Eagan, a Minnesota municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: That the Landowner, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant and convey unto the City, its successors and assigns, a permanent drainage and utility easement over, across and under the following described premises, situated within Dakota County, Minnesota, to-wit: The southerly 10.00 feet of said Lots 1 and 2, KSTP ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. See also Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. The grant of the foregoing permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes includes the right of the City, its contractors, agents and servants to enter upon the premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair and maintain pipes, conduits and mains; and the further right to remove trees, brush, undergrowth and other obstructions. After completion of such construction, maintenance, repair or removal, the City shall restore the premises to the condition in which it was found prior to the commencement of such actions, save only for the necessary removal of trees, brush, undergrowth and other obstructions. And the Landowner, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are Landowner of the premises aforesaid and has good right to grant and convey the easement herein to the City. aFC;FivF_D - MAIL - DATE RECEIVED __Lb -- r6 -- a U - J DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER-AUDITOR . to .;OUNTY %+. kr,;SUR R-AUDITOR IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Landowners have caused this easement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. West Publishing Corporation By: v? l Its: 'l Cj (? L- l LL 7('s3? STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF J)agbPe, ) F The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?s day of 2007, byghLU'D71 221 LA, , the _f/ta ,t- Q f,LLLad, West Publishing Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of said Corporation. 4- Notary Public APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney's Office Dated: /v(.?1.1 PATF LUNDLIUIST NOTNIYRNIG-A tera>?+tm-auto APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Public Works Depart ent Dated.hD THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Eagan Engineering Division Public Works Department 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Easement No. 1159 G:Easements/Drainage-Utility Esmt. West Publishing z? i9 UF'F LKMAN UKIVt ® Proposed Drainage and Utility Easement City of Evan Engineering Department Drainage and Utility Easement Lots 1 & 2, KSTP Addition &1e-zao7 Exhibit A Cr S c>? Lot Block 0 PID # ?o Permit # I_? -1 Subd. K Receipt # 1 3? CJ 7 7 90 CITY OF EAGAN SEWER/WATER REPAIR OR DISCONNECT PERMIT 2000 Date 7- / 7 - 2- d c)D Address/area to be repaired Description Sewer Y, 3&-d c Water -k C) G 6-Cp- / `/ 1 Fee: $50.50 W.?- 01?J-U?1vu. k Owner: Street Address: I Installer: W Alt -- Address: City Zip Code: S S / Signatur of Pennittee ?g Telephone: Zip Code: Telephone: 11- -7 9-7- G L (area code) CITY OF EAGAN CASHIER: JS TERMINAL NO: 669 DATE: 07/17/00 TIME: 15:04:30 ID: NAME: PETES WATER & SEWER INC 3743 9220 3504 HWY 149 50.00 2155 9001 3504 HWY 149 0.50 Total Receipt Amount: 50.50 CR134517 USER ID: JAN CITY USE ONLY L B RECEIPT #: 1 73, SUBD. IBS RECEIPTDATE 7-x'21-00 APPROVED BY: INSPECTOR PLUMBING PERMIT # 4 1 '8' - 8000 PLUMBING PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) CITY OF EAGAN 3$30 PILOT KNOB RD EAGAN, MN 5518E 651-681-4675 Please complete for: all commercial/industrial buildings multi-family buildings when separate building permits are not required for each dwelling unit installation of backflow preventer in commercial areas or residential boulevards Date: / ad Work Type: _ New Bldg. /_ Add-on _ Repair _ U.G. Sprinkler _ RPZ Description of Work: J f ?G /906GL KWIC 71fl //1zP kv7 To inquire if Pressure Reducing Valve is required on new service, call 651-6814646. FEES 1% of contract price or $30.00 minimum Contract Price: $ x 1% = $ _ Base Fee - Water Meter: 2" Turbo $897.00 unless plan approved for smaller size 1-1/2" Turbo - $726.00 Service: _ existing (if coming off domestic line) OR _ new If "new service contact Jerry Wobschall Finance Consultant to confirm adding fees fora Water Permit & Surcharge $ 50.50 Water Supply & Storage $ 840.00 Water Treatment Plant Charge $ 492.00 cc: Diane Downs, UtilityBitting -underground sprinkler permits State Surcharge $.50 minimum; calculate at $.50 for each $1,000 Base Fee Base Fee S CJ -C) O State Surcharge $ Total Fee $ '-2->U 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the information is correct, and agree to comply with all applicable City of Eagan ordinances. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the property owner that the City of Eagan assumes no liability for any damages caused by the City during its normal operational and maintenance activities to the facilities constructed under this permit within City property/right-of-way/easement. SITE ADDRESS: ??? J? (?(?? ?? TENANT NAME: WAS THERE A PREVIOUS NA NT IN THIS SPACE? _ Y _ N INSTALLER NAME: / lej l Oa/f Gam' ¢ /jGCaP? STREET ADDRESS: TELEPHONE #: (AREA CODE) NAME: TELEPHONE #: _?-7 C'/ -/ 41?2- (AREA CO DE) 9?d CITY: / y6 °l j l STATE: /, /-&?'JUL I %p: ar?? SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (I I ,y 2000 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (COMMERCIAL) (/?I CITY OF EAGAN 651-681-4675 Ce (?, 0 s2 Foundation Only New Construction Interior Improvement • Structural Plans (2 sets) • Architectural Plans (2 sets) • Architectural Plans (2 sets) • Civil Plans (2 sets) • Structural Plans (2 sets) • Code Analysis (1) '* • Certificate of Survey (1) • Civil Plans (2 sets) • Project Specs (1 set) • Code Analysis (1) " • Landscaping Plans (2 sets) • Key Plan (1) • Project Specs (1) • Code Analysis (1) " • Master Exit Plan (1) • Spec. Insp. & Testing Schedule • Certificate of Survey (1) • Energy Calculations (1) not always- • Soils Report (1) • Spec. Insp. & Testing Schedule (1) • Elec. Power & Lighting Form (1) not always- • Meter size must be established • Meter size must be established • Meter size must be established - if applicable • Project Specs (1) 1 • Energy Calculations (1) 1 • Electric Power & Lighting Form (1) •• ! 1 • Master Exit Plan (1) 1 1 • Fire Protection Plan (1) •• 1 1 • Soils Report (1) 1 • MC/ES SAC determination letter • MC/ES SAC determination letter MC/ES SAC determination letter call 651.602-1000 call 651-602-1000 call 651-602-1000 uu?nJy )I[ tVUVUVJIO IVI Stlrilple Food & bev age lodging facilities: 'Plan must be submitted to Minnto Department of Health - call 651-215-0700 for details. -'T O Lt'fi uIV DATE: WORK TYPE: _ NEW _REMODEL CONSTRUCTION COST: ?Gr> DESCRIPTION OF WORK: /JErnDL_)T7IA i OF AA)LO1Ail- TENANT NAME: /\I,A SUITE #: IUM- FORMER TENANT NAME:_ N2A SITE ADDRESS: 3 5t)LA I)Ar'7 P-pW LOT BLOCK fio SUBD s Name: 11??blJ f`1 11)/? Phone#: PROPERTY Last First we OWNER ? RDI? f I Street Address: C? J PP?RN1 ? 6) )rN City tip\ (zQCIU State: `r L N Zip: Company: ! SU_ M 1 M ?J E-?1U 11 N L L (-- Phone #: Sa ) 10' (H -] CONTRACTOR Street Address: City State: / r tN Zip: ARCHITECT/ s / ENGINEER Company: , V Phone #: Registration #: Street city 3 State: It)// Zip: Licensed plumber installing sewerlwater:_ It-A Phone Meter Size: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the information is correc n gree omply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Applicant: `fog3o 0i0 00 MEMO TO: DIANE DOWNS, UTILITY BILLING CLERK FROM: ED KIRSCHT, SR. ENGINEERING TECH DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1990 SUBJECT: LOT 11 KSTP PLAT ABBOTT SERVICE CO. - 3504 DODD ROAD I have recomputed the REF for the Abbott Service Co. at 3504 Dodd Road. The total REF's for 3504 Dodd Road should be 2.9 REFS instead of 9.5 REF's. The reason for the large reduction is that Lot 2 is now a undeveloped vacant lot and when the original computation was made Abbott Service Co. had rented out the property and it was used as a storage area. 1?C Edward Kir ht Sr. Engineering Tech cc: Michael P. Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer EK/jf C7: 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8t00 September 21, 1987 PAUL M ABBOTT 3504 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Project #442 Alt, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, RSTP Addition Special Assessment Objection Dear Mr. Abbott: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Ada h&Wor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk At the formal public hearing before the City Council, you submitted a written objection to the proposed final assessments against your property for the improvements associated with that project. Subsequently, the Council deleted your property from the final assessment roll that was formally adopted and certified to the County for certification onto the tax rolls. Your objection was then referred to the Special Assessment Committee for an in-depth review of the improvements, the related benefit to your property and the proposed assessments. This Special Assessment Committee is comprised of two Council members, two Planning Commission members and three residents of the community. After their review, they will forward a recommendation to the City Council for formal consideration of final adoption of the proposed assessments. The Council's consideration of the Special Assessment Committee's recommendations will be held at a future formal public hearing and mailed notification similar to the public hearing process you recently completed. While there is no definitive schedule for the Special Assessment Committee meetings, it is not anticipated that this item will come before that Committee-any sooner than April of next year. In the interim, the City will be performing a formal appraisal of your property to verify that the benefit to your property through increased value was at least equal to the amount of the proposed assessments. This appraisal process will be coordinated through our City Attorney's office during the ensuing months. When the Special Assessment Committee meeting has been scheduled, you will be so notified in writing with a request to provide any n THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY September 21, 1987 Page 2 additional information or appraisals you may have compiled in the interim. Once all this information has been gathered , a staff report will be prepared for the Committee meeting with a copy forwarded to your attention prior to that meeting. In the interim, this special assessment will continue to be listed as a "pending" assessment but there will be no interest accrued beyond the amounts proposed at the time of the recent final assessment hearing. If you have any other questions regarding this procedure or your assessment, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sin rely, Thomas A. Colber , Director of Public Works TAC/ jj cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk AS OF: 10/26/1993 PROPERTY ID: 10-40950-010-00 S/A# ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF CD 100005 SAN SEW LAT 0000 O1 0.0000 2335.00 0.00 0.00 CL 100009 WATER AREA 0000 O1 0.0000 548.80 0.00 0.00 CL 100151 SAN SW TRK 1970 20 8.0000 336.00 0.00 0.00 CL 101800 W 442 1988 10 9.0000 2570.40 0.00 0.00 PP 101801 SSLTK 442 1988 10 9.0000 4178.09 0.00 0.00 PP 101802 SSTK 442 1988 10 9.0000 3592.80 0.00 0.00 PP 101803 ST 442 1988 10 9.0000 13440.90 0.00 0.00 PP 1OP600 HWY 149/BECKER RD, 0000 10 O.Q000 20661.68 0.00 PN 5 ------ SUMMARY OF LEVIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ****** 1993 P&I CERTIFIED 3876.48 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF PENDING 20661.68 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF CLOSED 27001.99 Press ENTER; or F1, F4, F5, F7, F8 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCH 'AS OF: 10/26/1993 SUMMARY PROPERTY ID: 10-40950-020-00 S/A$ ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF CD 100009 WATER AREA 0000 O1 0.0000 994.70 0.00 0.00 CL 100151 SAN SW TRK 1970 20 8.0000 609.00 0.00 0.00 CL 101804 WSSVC 442 1988 10 9.0000 1553.88 0.00 0.00 PP 1OP442 STORM SEWER TRUNK 0000 O1 0.0000 32187.07 0.00 PN 1OP600 HWY 149/BECKER RD 0000 10 0.0000 24013.26 0.00 PN ------ SUMMARY OF LEVIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ****** 1993 P&I CERTIFIED 253.28 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF PENDING 56200.33 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF CLOSED 3157.58 Press ENTER; or F1, F4, F5, F7, F8 Page 23/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1988 McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and reaffirm the final assessment roll for Project 460A (Nichols Road) as it pertains to Lot 3, Block It Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. PROJECT 442 ALTERNATE, BECKER ROAD, LOT 4, BLOCK 1, LOREN PLACE Public Works Director Tom Colbert advised the Council that staff recommended that Special Assessment Policy 82-2 be made available to reduce the assessment obligation as referenced with the difference being postponed until a change in use at a later date. Further, he recommended that the application for senior citizens' deferment be approved which would defer the reduced assessment until the senior citizens' deferment ordinance. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate, (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lot 4, Block It Loren Place, as recommended by the Special Assessments Committee, and subject to Policy 82-2 and a senior citizen deferment, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. .PROJECT 442 ALTERNATE, BECKER ROAD, LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK If KSTP ADDITION Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained to the Council that the assessments were calculated in accordance with past City policies and procedures uniformly against all similarly zoned property. However, because the apparent present use of the property is under-utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal had indicated that the increase in market value in its present state was only $25,000.00. Therefore, it was recommended that the proposed assessment be proportionately reduced according to the estimated increase in market value of $25,000.00 and that the remainder be postponed until such time that the property developed to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessments. John Hannigan, Attorney, stated they had retained their own appraiser. He stated that $25,000.00 was acceptable, however, he recommended his client not sign the agreement. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate (Becker Road) as it pertains to.Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, KSTP Addition, in the amount of $25,000.00, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. ..,,z city of eoc?an THDMASEGAN Mayor PATRICUI AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN March 16, 199$ ? THEODORE WACHTER Council Members JOHN BANNIGAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW THOMAS HEDGES BANNIGAN 8c KELLY, P.A. City Ad"tinldrator 1730 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk 443 MIl3NESOTA STREET ST PAUL, MN SS101 life: Paul Abbott; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,?KSTP-Addition" PID Nos.10-40950-010-00 and 10-40950-020-00 Dear Mr. Baanigan: It has come to my attention that when the above-teferenced parcels were sold in 1993, yow client as the seller, was requested to escrow monies covering two pending assessments that had fumed up in a title search. The title search apparently uncovered a pending assessment for 520,661.68 for Project No. 600 on Parcel 010-00. The 520,661.68 pending assessment for Parcel 010-00 was reduced to 55,000 in settlement of a special assessment lawsuit. That agreement was reached in November of 1993 and the City's records were adjusted accordingly at the time. The 55,000 assessment for Project No. 600 has been paid. As of November 21, 1994, no pending assessment shows on the City's records for Parcel 010-00. The second pending assessment listed in the title search was 532,187.07 for storm sewer trunk from Project No. 442 for Parcel 020-00. Although dris sum is listed in City records as a "pending assessment," it was not a levied nor pending assessment pursuant to MN Statute Chapter 429. What is intended to be conveyed by the notation "pending assessment," is notice to a prospective buyer of the property, that the City intends to pursue collection of gtsh connection charges as provided by MN Statute §444.073 and Eagan City Code Section 3.07 at such lime as the parcel connects to the utility. The label of the sum as a "pending assessment" is a notice provision only and does not denote a levied assessment. We will ba removing this notation from the City's rewrds. Sincerely, ?? ". rry E. . VaaOverbeke ?? Finance DirectorlCity Clerk EJV/vmd ??? S 4-??G ??,N?' ?? a ?aJ?? MUNIgPAt CENTER X830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122.1897 PHONE: (612j 681d60D FAX: (612) 681J612 IDD: (612)454-0595 • THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNffY Fquol OpporlunRy/ATRRrwtlve Acton Empbyer MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN. MBVNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612)651-4900 FAX: (612j 651.4960 TDD: (612)454.8535 Page 13/FAGAN CITY COUNCIL November 16, 1993 DAKOTA COUN11'11.:j:FrAG(JF Ak .(jVERNMENT Councilmember Hunter advised that he was appointed to the Board of the Dakota County League of Government and at their last meeting, Mark Ulfers had explained the role of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. In January, it is expected that Representative Tim Pawlenty will discuss the Metropolitan Council. ?..... tM LULL COMRATIOC: City Administrator Hedges explained that.; i4 BadgeK': i:Bazen Company of Johnsonville, South Carolina, had successfully bid for acquisidop:d:A -:uII;ipptpotittion. Director of Community Development Reichert said that the Badger R. Baun Contip?y'WOUId lib 4.6 9cquire the existing Lull Corporation building and bring it up to standards. She further explained that the company is looking to the St. Paul Port Authority for financial assistance as the Port is offering long-term, low interest financing outside the City of St. Paul within the Metro East area but only in the area of manufacturing. In addition, the Port Authority advised that the project would probably quality for a Small Cities Grant through the Department of Trade and Economic Development. Ms. Reichert said the City hasn't always qualified in the past but because this is manufacturing and a significant number of jobs are invol#edr *,.chances are good. The grant could involve 5250,000 to 5500,000 from DTED but the pay back would'tii i6:jlie` 4,-:.The City could then use those funds in the future for additional, selected projects. In answer to a question from CouaciltaCtnbet y. ji3itei `Ms. Reichert stated the company would manufacture the Lull machine. The new owsters b: '-' - tb'ere is a market and they would attempt to get back the employees who worked for Lull is the p?st'liave people trained at the vo-tecb in its manufacture. Ms. Reichert explained that if Badger Bazen does not acquire the company, it is likely the highly-specialized building would sit vacant for many years. The Council noted no risk to the City and was enthusiastic about the acquisition. M ABBOTT Mayor Egan introduced this item as atipulsticjn'of`Se[Clement, final assessments, Project 600, Paul M. Abbott. Hunter moved Awed seconded, a motion to`approva?i c stipulation of settlement agreement for property identified as #10-49050-010-00 and 10.49050-020-00 and4-pprove the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Council to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL jETING Awada moved Wachter secamded ;a motiep : sot :.A *W City Council meeting for November 23, 1993, at 5:00 p.m. to further discuss the City"'lvfispicipteiitrirPit6lic Safety expansion program. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MISCELLANEOUS.::` Councilmember Awada advised that she and Couneihmember Malin will be meeting with Anthony Capon next week. Councilmember Malin reported that she had appeared before the Apple Valley City Council MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA/NOVEMBER 16, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY ATTORNFv The City Council reserves the right to schedule an executive session for the purpose of considering pending litigation. At the present time, there are no plans for an executive session. Item L Lull Corporation Acquisition-For informative purposes, a memo is enclosed on page ,from Director of Community Development Reichert announcing the recent acgmsrtion of Lull Corporation by Badger R Bazen Company of Johnsonville, South Carolina St4 including the Director of Community Development, Assistant to the Qty Administrator Hohenstein and the City Administrator had been meeting with representatives of the Bazen Company prior to the November 2 auction. Item 2. MVTA Board Meeting--Enclosed on pages through ,for informative purposes is a copy of a memo from Senior Planner Marnin providing information about the October Minnesota Valley Transit meeting. Item 3. _ Stipulation of Settlement, Final Assessments, Project 600, Paul M. Abbott-At the time of the final assessment hearing for the above-referenced project, the City received an objection from Paul M Abbott for property identification #'s 10-49050-010-00 and 1040950- 020-00. Subsequently, as a part. of the City appraisal process and negotiations associated with this objection, a stipulation of settlement agreement has been prepared and approved by the property owner and is being presented to the City Council for their concurrence. The settlement agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office and City staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. Enclosed on page,Wis a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement. 'This will allow the City to levy the new assessment for collection. Enclosed without page number for the Council's information is a copy of a previleged and confidential memo from the City Attorney's office regarding this item ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the stipulation of settlement agreement for property identification #'s 10-49050-010-00 and 10490504M0-00 and approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Council to execute all related documents. - /S/ Thomas L Hedges City Administrator /If70 BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3]81 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON Municipal Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 September 28, 1988 _ ?V Q\ JANET WILEBSKI LEGAL ASSISTANT RE: Paul W. Abbott vs. City of Eagan Dear Municipal Clerk: Enclosed and served upon you by U.S. Mail please find a copy of an OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT as it regards the above-captioned matter and Project 442ALT. JB:cge Enclosure C: Mr. Paul W. Abbott Sincerely yours, STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA Case Type: Assessment Appeal DISTRICT COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No: PAUL W. ABBOTT, Appellant, VS. OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, Respondent. IN RE: APPEAL FROM LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR LOCAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. Ch. 429 TO: MUNICIPAL CLERK and/or PRESIDING OFFICER of the CITY OF EAGAN, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21199, Eagan, MN 55121. YOU, AND EACH OF YOU, WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Paul W. Abbott, through the undersigned, his attorneys, objects to the amount of the special assessment proposed to be considered and levied on Thursday, October 6, 1988 for Project 442ALT. The grounds for the objection to the proposed assessment are that the said proposed assessment exceeds the special benefits to the property derived from the public improvement known as Project 442ALT. The purpose of this objection to assessment is to comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. §429.061, Subd. 2 thereof, as amended, and to preserve the rights of the owner herein to appeal to District Court pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. §429.081 thereof, as amended. Dated this 28th day of September, 1988. BANNIGAN & X-VLY By .p'( J n Banniga . tt ey No. 4546 Midwest Federal 50 E. 5th. Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-3781 Attorneys for Appellant, Paul W. Abbott r-J -2- C /'0 BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON September 28, 1988 f RECEiViD 5EP 3 ® 1988 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knobb Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Our Client: 3504 Dodd Road Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Colbert: ` ^7 V iJL l.? JANET WILEBSKI LEGAL ASSISTANT J??vl Paul W. Abbott Our client has forwarded to me a copy of your letter dated September 22, 1988. If I read your letter and attachment correctly, the recommendation of the City is to propose an assessment of $25,000.00 for immediate collection and the balance of $30,969.26 to be deferred until there is a sale, change in ownership or development proposal on site. Subsequent to the hearing before the Special Assessment Committee, I retained the services of Winfield A. Mitchell, an independent fee appraiser, (whose appraisal qualifications I enclose for your information) to prepare a.memorandum of evaluation on a preliminary basis. Based upon his preliminary investigation, he indicates that the special benefit attributable to the project in question is less than $21,000.00. It would be my recommendation to our client to appeal the special assessment in excess of $21,000.00 whether levied, deferred or a combination of the two. v?? Mr. Thomas A. Colbert Page 2 September 28, 1988 Under separate cover and addressed to the Municipal Clerk, I am forwarding an Objection to the assessment pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. §429.061, Subd. 2 thereof, as amended. Sincerely yours, JB: cge Enclosure C: Mr. Paul M. Abbott 4NILL P.A. ohn `? 6B WI,NFIELD A. MITCHELL APPRAISALS 412 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 Addn.e4s APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS 412 Midwest Federal Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 1125 Ivy Hill Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55115 uate Central High School, St..Paul, Minnesota Student University of Minnesota Extension Division - 6 years App4ai6aZ Sehoot American Institute of Real-Estate Appraisers Case Study I and II St. Paul Board of Realtors American Society of Appraisers, Senior Member American Right of Way Association American Society of Military Engineers National Association of Review Appraisers .%6en and BAokeA Since- 1946 Ee.tate 046ieeA U. S. Army Reserve - 14 years (concurrent) ative Ceien.t6 Ram6ey County State oj Minnesota U. S. GoveAnment City o4 St. Paut Munieipa.eifi.ee and MoAtgage Companies` District Court - Condemnation Commissioner Probate Court Department of Administration Department of Transportation Attorney General Department of Military Affairs U. S. Army Corps of Engineers General Services Administration Housing and Redevelopment Authority Bureau of "Valuations Board of Water Commissioners Board of Education Port Authority Arden Hills, Madplewood, New Brighton, Oakdale, Shore Rosemount,.White Bear Lake American National Bank Chase Manhattan Bank, N. Y,, N. Y. Minnesota Federal Savings g Loan Assn, Burlington Northern Railway Co. Northern States Power Co. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. Lais, Bannigan and Kelly, P.A. Warren E. Peterson, P.A.' Rowland F, Mertensotto, P.A. John Daubney Ginkel F, Gallagher James Campbell Raymond W. Faricy O¦ 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE. (612) 454-8100 September 22, 1988 MR PAUL M ABBOTT 3504 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, KSTP Addition Project 442 Alt., Special Assessment Objection Dear Mr. Abbott: VIC ELLISON Mayo' THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City A Jminislrmlor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On June 30, the Special Assessment Committee met to review your objections to the proposed assessments of $23,782.19 for Lot 1, and $32,187.07 for Lot 2 for the improvements associated with Project 442 Alt., UPS Addition (Streets & Utilities). Enclosed is a copy of that portion of the minutes pertaining to your objection. You will note that the Committee recommended that the combined total assessment of $55,969.26 be reduced to $25,000. These comments and recommendations Council for formal consideration and 6, 1988. If you have any additional to have considered by the Council, attention no later than October 3, forwarded to the Council in a timely sill be forwarded to the City action on Thursday, October comments that you would like please forward them to my 1988, so that they can be manner. Sincerely, omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk Enclosure THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SPECIAL ASSESSM0T COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PACE 8 Creegan moved, Egan seconded the notion to reaffirm the assessment of $7,059.60 subject to reduction under Special Assessment Policy 82-2 to $4,706.40 upon the appropriate execution of documents and for the further deferment of the reduced assessment under the Senior Citizens Deferment Ordinance. All voted in favor. ALM 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, KSTP ADDITION PAUL ABBOTT Public Works Director Colbert stated that Project 442 ALT. provided for the upgrading of Becker Road with City utilities and upgrading from a gravel rural ditch County road to an urban commercial/industrial street. Total proposed assessment obligations against Lots 1 and 2 of the KSTP Addition amount of $55,969.26 rather than the amount referenced in the property owner's written objection. Because the apparent present use of the property is under utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal has indicated that the increase in market value in its present state is only $25,000.00. The remainder should be postponed until such time as the property develops to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. John Bannigan, Attorney with Bannigan & Kelly, appeared representing Paul Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that there is no increase in the fair market value of the property owned by his client and that if the City intended to assess his client the $55,900.00, the fair market value needed to increase by $55,900.00. Mr. Bannigan indicated that the 1985 tax statements as prepared by the County Assessor's Office for both Lots showed a market value of $85,400.00. In 1988 after completion of the project, the County Assessor's market value is stated at $103,200.00. Mr. Bannigan asserted that much of that $17,800.00 increase is due to general market value increase for Eagan in general, together with general inflation. Mr. Bannigan indicated that present Minnesota law allows the property owner to submit the County estimated market values as evidence of the value of the given property. Mr. Bannigan questioned the appraisal conducted by Dahlen & Dwyer on behalf of the City and in particular the wording that the assessments were approximately $25,000.00 can be substantiated for the property. He pointed out that the language is not an appraisal and may be hedging on ther'part of Mr. Dwyer. Mr. Bannigan stated that the burden on the City is to prcve that the proposed assessment is directly attributable to the benefits provided to the property from the project. Mr. Bannigan indicated that his client would not voluntarily sign any agreement to pay an additional $30,000.00 over the $25,000.00 set forth in the Dahlen & Dwyer appraisal, let.alone accept the figure proposed by Dahlen & Dwyer. In response to inquires from TWaddell, Director of Public works Colbert indicated that the County Assessor's Office may not have been on the site or been aware of the recent improvements when setting its market value. Mr. Bannigan indicated that under the County Assessor's valuations, the interior of the two lots increased by $5,000.00 and the corner lot increased by $12,100.00. In SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CGMdITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PAGE 9 conclusion, Mr. Bannigan indicated that out of the $17,800.00, the City would have to ferret out how much was borne by market conditions, general inflation, etc. versus that which is directly attributable to the public improvements benefitting the property. Committee Member Egan inquired,of Mr. Bannigan whether or not to resolve all matters, if Mr. Bannigan would accept the $17,800.00 figure Mr. Bannigan indicated that he would need to discuss that with his client, but if he were to say 'yes', that would be premised on the waiver of the City of all future hook-up charges, especially those that may be imposed against a future owner who wants to hook-up to the water system. At this point, Mr. Bannigan would not recommend to his client the acceptance of any figure in excess of the combined increase sham on the tax statements sham by the county. Public Works Director Colbert indicated that it is only fair that if it is determined Chat there is no benefit for the water main being adjacent to the property, that at some future date they wanted to hook into the water main, that they should pay a connection charge. Mr. Bannigan indicated that the waiver of connection charges was only in response to the committee member's inquiry as to the acceptance of the $17,800.00 figure by Mr. Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that if a recommendation were made to the Council to negotiate a settlement at $17,800.00, it must be understood to mean that the City would waive any future connection charges imposed upon this or any future owner. Committee Member Egan indicated Chat due to the large discrepancy between the Da'hlen & Dwyer appraisal and the $17,800.00, it would be difficult for him to recommend a settlement at $17,800.00. CommiCtee Member Merkley inquired as to how many or what appraisal is determinative as to the benefitted amount. Committee member Egan and Director of Public Works Colbert indicated that it is the most creditable. Mr. Creegan expressed concern regarding the language used by Dwyer in the appraisal and inquired whether or not that could be made more clear. Creegan moved, Egan seconded, the motion to recommend that the proposed assessment be reduced to $25,000.00. All voted in favor. Creegan m>c,ied, Egan seconded the motion to amend the previously adopted recommendation to include as part of the recommendation that the remainder of the total proposed assessment be postponed until such time as the property developes to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. All voted in favor. PARCEL 10-2100-010-07/TODD & ELLEN rRANZ Director of Public Works Colbert stated that under Project 455 the City installed the watermain and storm sewer utilities along with upgrading Deerwood Drive from its previous gravel road rural ditch section co an urban street with concrete sidewalks and trailways between 35E and Pilot Knob Road. The property qualifies under Special Assessment Policy 86-3 because of its ?.-.characteristics as a large unplatted property. Under the terms of the policy OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 MC ELLISON EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Ma PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON July 12, 1988 PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Mem1»" THOMAS HEDGES MR DAN DWYER EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE DAHLEN & DWYER INC 1260 NORWEST CENTER TOWER ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Appraisal For'Lots11 &j2,lBlock KSTP_ Addition J Project 442 Alternate Becker Road (Streets & Utilities - Assessment Appeal) Dear Dan: On March 30, you forwarded to my attention a "preliminary" appraisal of the property referenced above located at 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan MN. In that preliminary appraisal, you indicated that you felt that assessments of "approximately $25,000" can be substantiated for the property. Based on the comments presented at the Special Assessment Committee meeting of June 30, it appears that we will need a more formal appraisal specifically defining the maximum increase in value to the property associated with the benefits received from this particular project. Therefore, please complete the full written appraisal and submit it to my attention as soon as possible so that we can proceed with our resolution of this assessment objection. Your anticipated prompt response will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, //D Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mike Dougherty, City Attorney 7HELONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY X city of eaga n 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 VIC ELLISON EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Moyer PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON February 9, 1988 PAMELA MCCRFA THEODORE WACHTER C«.1hftmt Mr. Paul Abbott THOMAS HEDGES 3504 Dodd Road Cm Aa in& mr Eagan Mn 55122 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CRY Cwk RE: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OBJECTION - PROPERTY APPRAISAL/VIEWING PROJECT NO. 442 ALTERNATE-LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 KSTP] ADDITION Dear Mr. Abbott: On September 21, 1987, a letter was sent to your attention informing you that your written objection to the proposed final assessments for the above-referenced project was being forwarded to the Special Assessment Committee scheduled to meet in April of 1988. That letter also informed you that the City would be performing a formal appraisal of the property to verify that the benefit to your property through increased value was at least equal to the amount of the proposed assessments. This letter is to inform you that Mr. Dan Dwyer of the appraisal firm of Dahlen & Dwyer will be contacting you in the near future to review your property in detail. This will require access to your house to help determine the valuations associated with your property. While I recognize that this may be an inconvenience, it would be greatly appreciated if you could extend every courtesy to Mr. Dwyer in performing this property appraisal so that the report can be completed in a timely manner to be forwarded to the Special Assessment Committee. Mr. Dwyer will be contacting you in advance to schedule a time convenient for both parties. Your continued patience and cooperation through this process is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Dan Dwyer, City Appraiser TAC/jf THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 21, 1987 PAUL M ABBOTT 3504 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Project #442 Alt, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, RSTP Addition Special Assessment Objection Dear Mr. Abbott: BEA BLOMQUIST Mo r THOMAS EGAN ,A MES A SMITH VAC ELL60N THEODORE WACHTER County Members THOMAS HEDGES CM Adm? ima EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city Clark At the formal public hearing before the City Council, you submitted a written objection to the proposed final assessments against your property for the improvements associated with that project. Subsequently, the Council deleted your property from the final assessment roll that was formally adopted and certified to the County for certification onto the tax rolls. Your objection was then referred to the Special Assessment Committee for an in-depth review of the improvements, the related benefit to your property and the proposed assessments. This Special Assessment Committee is comprised of two Council members, two Planning Commission members and three residents of the community. After their review, they will forward a recommendation to the City Council for formal consideration of final adoption of the proposed assessments. The Council's consideration of the Special Assessment Committee's recommendations will be held at a future formal public hearing and mailed notification similar to the public hearing process you recently completed. While there is no definitive schedule for the Special Assessment Committee meetings, it is not anticipated that this item will come before that Committee 'any sooner than April of next year. In the interim, the City will be performing a formal appraisal of your property to verify that the benefit to your property through increased value was at least equal to the amount of the proposed assessments. This appraisal process will be coordinated through our City Attorney's office during the ensuing months. When the Special Assessment Committee meeting has been scheduled, you will be so notified in writing with a request to provide any THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY September 21, 1987 Page 2 additional information or appraisals you may have compiled in the interim. Once all this information has been gathered , a staff report will be prepared for the Committee meeting with a copy forwarded to your attention prior to that meeting. In the interim, this special assessment will continue to be listed as a "pending" assessment but there will be no interest accrued beyond the amounts proposed at the time of the recent final assessment hearing. If you have any other questions regarding this procedure or your assessment, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sin rely, Thomas A. . Co Colber , Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk /D yo9.-a oio oD EAGAN TOWNSHIP 3795 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55111 Telephone 454-5242 PERMIT FOR WATER SERVICE CONNECTION Date: October 28. 1971 Billing Name: Schwerman Trucking Owner: same Plumber:V. E. Phillips Plumbing Co. K.5 T. P. Akin Number: 740 Site Address: 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan 55123 Billing Address same Meier Si Meter No Permit Fee 10.00 pd 10/28/71 .50 pd 10/29/71 Meter Reading Meter Dep. Meter Sealed: Yes` jAdd'1 Chg. NO I Total Chg. Building is a: Residence Multiple No. Uni Commercial xx Industrial Other Inspected by Date Remarks: X25.00 RE-INSPF.CT1 ,i -L- Fdl? By: Chief Inspector In consideration of the issue and delivery to me of the above permit, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the rules and regulations of Eagan Township, Dakota County, Minnesota. r By: V. E. Phillips Please notify the above office when ready for inspection and connection. /D //p 9349 D/D 00 EAGAN TOWNSHIP 3795 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55111 Telephone 454-5242 PERMIT FOR SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DATE: October 28, 1971 K•S•1'R AcWh NUMBER 898 OWNER: Schwerman Trucking Co. Address 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan 55123 PLUMBERV. E. Phillips TYPE OF PIPE Heavy Cast Iron DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Industrial Commercial Residential Multiple Dwelling No. of units xxx Location of Connections: Connection Charge Permit Fee 10.00 pd xk*ftik 10/28/71 .50 pd 10/28/71 Street Repairs Total Inspected by: Date Remarks: By. Chief Inspector In consideration of the issue and delivery to me of the above permit, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the rules and regulations of Eagan Township, Dakota County, Minnesota BY V. E. Phillips Plumbing Co. 1200 Summit Avenue, St. Paul 55107 Please notify when ready for inspection and connection and before any portion of the work is covered. -'` Schwerman Trucking co. .? .} Go D/D d D/ 611 South 28 Street. Nilaaukee.Nisconsin 53246 December 17, 1971 Town of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road St, Paul, Minnesota 55111 Gentlemen: RE: Sewer and "Water Laterals 1972 EXECUTIVE OFFICES AREA CODE 414 671-t600 We are enclosing our check in the amount of $2,335,00 r along with the attached statement. Please receipt and return in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Sincerely yourst SCHWERMAN TRUCKING 00* Kenneth L. Wilson Director of Taxation Encl. EA VLL g'j ?SJA HWER. AN ERVICE PTISFIES f STATEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TOWN OF EAGAN 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD ST. PAUL, M114NESOTA 55111 '. i CONTROL I NUMBER STATEMENT PLEASE RETURN WITH PAYMENT THIS IS A STATEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY. YOU HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF PAYING THE TOTAL AMOUNT AS SHOWN (SEE BOX 51 WITHIN 30 DAYS WITHOUT INTEREST OR THE TOTAL AMOUNT WILL BE CERTIFIED TO DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITOR AT HASTINGS IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS AND APPEAR ON YOUR TAX STATEMENT. THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF EAGAN HAS CONFIRMED THE ASSESSMENT FOR (SEE BOX 1) WHICH IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE. IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID ON OR BEFORE DOE DATE (SEE BOX 2) THE SAME CAN BE PAID WITHOUT INTEREST. IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID ON OR BEFORE THE ABOVE DATE, THEN THE ASSESSMENT MAY BE PAID IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS (SEE BOX 3) WITH INTEREST AT 8% ON THE UNPAID BALANCE PROVIDED; HOWEVER, THAT THE FIRST INSTALLMENT SHALL BE WITH INTEREST AT B'!G FROM THE DATE OF THE COUNCIL'S CONFIRMATION OF THIS ASSESS- MENT WHICH IS (SEE BOX 4) TO DECEMBER 31, OF THAT YEAR. THE LAW PROVIDES THAT UNPAID ASSESSMENTS BECOME A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. T'?'ifTTSSC' F o Ii -wAl'i'77 _.ATi"?i'AT. n 3a 5c e e in I_ Fi- r 13-L ? v 1 I. o I SEWER & WATER LATERALS 1972 O A3 9f S]MIiNI VAfF Schwerman Trucking dp. December 260 1971' 20 (3) November 26, 1971 (0) -FRONTAGE PER FOOT 611 So 28th Street KSTP Section 13 (5) =23;;.00 LOT NO. ULOCK NO. PARCEL NO. PH O!RCT NO. Milwaukee Wisconsin ? 1 1 3500-A B PLEASE PAY ABOVE AMOUNT y (r 11 r , i..I Page 23/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1988 McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and reaffirm the final assessment roll for Project 460A (Nichols Road) as it pertains to Lot 3, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. PROTECT 442 ALTERNATE, BECKER ROAD, LOT 4, BLOCK IF LOREN PLACE Public Works Director Tom Colbert advised the Council that staff recommended that Special Assessment Policy 82-2 be made available to reduce the assessment obligation as referenced with the difference being postponed until a change in use at a later date. Further, he recommended that the application for senior citizens' deferment be approved which would defer the reduced assessment until the senior citizens' deferment ordinance. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate, (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lot 4, Block 1, Loren Place, as recommended by the Special Assessments Committee, and subject to Policy 82-2 and a senior citizen deferment, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. - PROJECT 442 ALTERNATE i_-BECKER-ROAD#-LOTS 1--AND 2-r--BLOCK 1i KSTP 'ADDITION -- - Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained to the Council that the assessments were calculated in accordance with past City policies and procedures uniformly against all similarly zoned property. However, because the apparent present use of the property is under-utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal had indicated that the increase in market value in its present state was only $25,000.00. Therefore, it was recommended that the proposed assessment be proportionately reduced according to the estimated increase in market value of $25,000.00 and that the remainder be postponed until such time that the property developed to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessments. John Bannigan, Attorney, stated they had retained their own appraiser. He stated that $25,000.00 was acceptable, however, he recommended his client not sign the agreement. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lots 1 and 2. Block IF KSTP Addition, in the amount of $25,000.00, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. MEMORANDUM TO: T m Hedges, City Administrator ne VanOverbeke, City Clerk FROM: Annette M. Margarit DATE: December 12, 1994 RE: 1988 Assessment on KSTP Parcels ?° k 44 ?gk0? r The attorney representing Paul Abbott, the owner Block 1, KSTP Addition parcels, has raised the pending assessment for Project No. 442, Becker October of 1988 Lot 1 was assessed as follows- of Lots 1 and 2, legality of the Road, levied in r Water - $ 2,570.0er. .4iV q? ?9 Sanitary Sewer Lateral - $ 41178.09 Sanitary Sewer Trunk - $ 3,592.80 Street - $13,440.00 TOTAL $23,781.79 f?.t Lot 2 has been assessed $1,553.88 for services. The special assessment report indicates storm sewer trunk pending assessments as $32,187.07. See the attached special assessment report provided by Deanna Kivi. Mr. Abbott's attorney maintains there should be no pending assessments as the Council did not properly defer any assessment. The special assessment committee minutes for June 30, 1988, indicate that the committee recommended the proposed assessment be reduced to $25,000.00 and that the remainder be postponed until such time as the property develops to a higher and more intense use. See Page 9 of those minutes, attached. The minutes for the October 6, 1988 City Council meeting, reflect that Tom Colbert presented the same recommendation to the City Council. At that hearing, Mr. Abbott's attorney stated that the reduction to $25,000.00 was acceptable but that he recommended that his client not sign the Agreement. Presumably the Agreement referred to in the Minutes was an Agreement to pay the remainder of the assessment when the property develops. The Minutes then describe the Council's action as follows: Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project No. 442 alternate (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, KSTP Addition, in the amount of $25,000.00, and authorizes its certification to the County. All voted in favor. Nothing in the Minutes shows the Council deferred the remaining assessment. A copy of those minutes is attached. The Minutes from the October 18, 1988, meeting indicates the Council requested changes in the October 6, 1988, meeting Minutes but no changes were made regarding Project 442 assessments. It is noted by looking at the minutes, that another assessment for Project No. 442, concerning Loren Place, indicates the Council specifically used Policy 82-2 "to reduce the assessment obligation as referenced with the difference being postponed until a change in use at a later date." Further, Council also authorized a senior citizen's deferment. Mr. Abbott's attorney insists that the council did not appropriately defer any assessment as is required by Minn. Stat. §429.061, Subd. 2. That Section as you know, requires the Council to pass a resolution adopting the assessment roll. §429.061, Subd. 2 also provides as follows: ". .Unless otherwise provided in the resolution, all assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over such period, not exceeding 30 years. . .except that the payment of the first installment of any assessment levied upon unimproved property may be deferred until a designated future year, or until the platting of the property. upon such terms and conditions and based upon such standards and criteria as may be provided by resolution of the council. (emphasis added) As shown in the Minutes, the Council made no mention of deferring the remaining assessment. In light of the language of Minn. Stat. §429.061, Subd. 2, requiring council action to defer an assessment, and the public record indicating Council did not do so, I believe the pending $32,187.07 assessment cannot be upheld. I recommend the removal of that assessment from the City's assessment records for this parcel. The $32,187.07 may possibly be recovered in the future through storm sewer connection fees pursuant to Section 3.07, Subd. 3 of the Eagan city code. AMM/wkt Enc. cc: James F. Sheldon, City Attorney F 4 q r r v c 11-I L y4 i .u5.h a0h Cf:. C: £ Q...,: :v J:: ; AS OF: 11/21/1994 PROPERTY ID: 10-40950-010-00 1 S/A# ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE 'DOTAL ANN•PRIN. 00 0 1 PAYOFF i o.00 CD CL 100005 SAN SEW LAT 0000 01 0.0000 2335.00 . 00 0 0.00 CL 100009 WATER AREA 0000 01 0.0000 548.80 . 00 0 0.00 CL 100151 SAN SW TRK 1970 20 8.0000 336.00 . 00 0 0.00 PP 101800 W 442 1988 10 9.0000 2570.40 . 00 0 ! D.DD PP 101801 SSLTK 442 1988 10 9.0000 4178.09 . 0 00 0.00 PP 101802 SSTK 442 1988 10 9.0000 3592.60 . 00 0 0.00 PP 101803 ST 442 1988 10 9.0000 13440.90 . 00 0 0.00 PP 102519 ST 600 1993 10 6.5000 5000.00 . ------ SUMMARY OF LEVIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ****** 1994 P&I CERTIFIED 0.00 00 0 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED . 0.00 0.00 ! 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF PENDING ------ SUMMARY OF CLOSED 32001.99 Press ENTER; or Fl, F4, F50 F7, F8 SPECIAL ASSES SMENT SEARCH SUMMARY AS OF: 11/21/1994 PROPERTY ID: 10-40950-020-0 0 S/A/ ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL ANN-PRIN. 00 0 PAYOFF 0.00 CD CL 100009 WATER AREA 0000 01 0.0000 994.70 . 00 0 0.00 CL 100151 SAN SW TRK 1970 20 8.0000 609.00 . 00 0 0.00 PP 101804 WSSVC 442 1988 10 9.0000 1553.88 00 5000 . 0.00 0.00 102519 ST 500 1993 10 01 6.5000 0000 0 . 32187.07 0.00 PN joP442 STORM SEWER TRUNK 0000 . ------ suMKARY OF LEVIED 0.00 0.00 j 0.00 ****** 1994 P&I CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED 32187.07 0100 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF PENDING ------ SM44ARY OF CLOSED 8157.58 Press ENTER; or F1, F4, F5, F7, F8 brand lax transmittal memo 7671 "' P2904 SPECIAL ASSESSM&,? O MITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PACE 8 Creegan moved, Egan seconded the motion to reaffirm the assessment of $7,059.60 subject to reduction under Special Assessment Policy 82-2 to $4,706.40 upon the appropriate execution of documents and for the further deferment of the reduced assessment under the Senior Citizens Deferment Ordinance: All voted in favor. ALOTS 1 & 21 BLACK Is KSTP ADDITION PAUL ABBOTT Public Works Director Colbert stated that Project 442 ALT. provided for the upgrading of Becker Road with City utilities and upgrading from a gravel rural ditch County road to an urban com+ercial/industrial street. Total proposed assessment obligations against Lots 1 and 2 of the KSTP Addition amount of $55,969.26 rather than the amount referenced in the property owner's written objection. Because the apparent present use of the property is under utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal has indicated that the increase in market value in its present state is only $25,000.00. The remainder should be postponed until such time as the property develops to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. John Bannigan, Attorney with Bannigan & Kelly, appeared representing Paul Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that there is no increase in the fair market value of the property owned by his client and that if the City intended to assess his client the $55,900.00, the fair market value needed to increase by $55,900.00. Mr. Hannigan indicated that the 1985 tax statements as prepared by the County Assessor's Office for both lots showed a market value of $85,400.00. In 1988 after completion of the project, the County Assessor's market value is stated at $103,200.00. Mr. Bannigan asserted that much of that $17,800.00 increase is due to general market value increase for Eagan in general, together with general inflation. Mr. Bannigan indicated that present Minnesota law allows the property owner to submit the County estimated market values as evidence of the value of the given property. Mr. Bannigan questioned the appraisal conducted by Dahlen & Dwyer on behalf of the City and in particular the wording that the assessments were approximately $25,000.00 can be substantiated for the property. He pointed out that the language is not an appraisal and may be hedging on th-:part of Mr. Dwyer. Mr. Hannigan stated that the burden on the City is to prc,:e that the proposed assessment is directly attributable to the benefits provided to the property from the project. Mr. Hannigan indicated that his client would not voluntarily sign any agreement to pay an additional $30,000.00 over the $25,000.00 set forth in the Dahlen & Dwyer appraisal, let alone accept the figure proposed by Dahlen & Dwyer. In response to inquires from Ttwaddell, Director of Public works Colbert indicated that the County Assessor's office may not have been on the site or been aware of the recent improvements when setting its market value. Mr. Hannigan indicated that under the County Assessor's valuations, the interior of the two lots increased by $5,000.00 and the corner lot increased by $12,100.00. In SPECIAL ASSESSKVr COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PACE 9 conclusion, Mr. Bannigan indicated that out of the $17,800.00, the City would have to ferret out how much was borne by market conditions, general inflation, etc. versus that which is directly attributable to the public improvements benefitting the property. Committee Member Egan inquired of Mr. Bannigan whether or not to resolve all matters, if Mr. Bannigan would accept the $17,800.00 figure Mr. Bannigan indicated that he would need to discuss that with his client, but if he were to say 'yes', that would be premised on the waiver of the City of all future hook-up charges, especially those that may be imposed against a future owner who wants to hook-up to the water system. At this point, Mr. Bannigan would not recommend to his client the acceptance of any figure in excess of the combined increase shown on the tax statements shown by the County. Public Works Director Colbert indicated that it is only fair that if it is determined that there is no benefit for the water main being adjacent to the property, that at some future date they wanted to hook into the water main, that they should pay a connection charge. Mr. Bannigan indicated that the waiver of connection charges was only in response to the committee member's inquiry as to the acceptance of the $17,800.00 figure by Mr. Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that if a recommendation were made to the Council to negotiate a settlement at $17,800.00, it must be understood to mean that the City would waive any future connection charges imposed upon this or any future owner. Committee Member Egan indicated that due to the large discrepancy between the Dahlen & Dwyer appraisal and the $17,800.00, it would be difficult for him to recommend a settlement at $17,800.00. Committee Member Merkley inquired as to how many or what appraisal is determinative as to the benefitted amount. Committee member Egan and Director of Public Works Colbert indicated that it is the most creditable. Mr. Creagan expressed concern regarding the language used by Dwyer in the appraisal and inquired whether or not that could be made more clear. Creegan moved, Egan seconded, the motion to recommend that the proposed assessment be reduced to $25,000.00. All voted in favor. Creegan moved, Egan seconded the motion to amend the previously adopted recommendation to include as part of the recommendation that the remainder of the total proposed assessment be postponed until such time as the property developer to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. All voted in favor. PARCEL 10-2100-010 -07/Tl7DD & ELLEN nWZ Director of Public Works Colbert stated that under Project 455 the City installed the watermain and storm sewer utilities along with upgrading Deerwoad Drive from its previous gravel road rural ditch section to an urban street with concrete sidewalks and trailways between 35E and Pilot Knob Road. The property qualifies under Special Assessment Policy 86-3 because of its characteristics as a large unplatted property. Under the terms of the policy Page 23/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES ":+F a? October 6, 1988 McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and reaffirm the final assessment roll for Project 460A (Nichols Road) as it pertains to Lot 3, Block 1. Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. PROJECT 442 ALTERNATE, BECKER ROAD. LOT 4, BLOCK It LOREN PLACE Public Works Director Tom Colbert advised the Council that staff recommended that Special Assessment Policy 82-2 be made available to reduce the assessment obligation as referenced with the difference being postponed until a change in use at a later date. Further, he recommended that the application for senior citizens' deferment be approved which would defer the reduced assessment until the senior citizens' deferment ordinance. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate, (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lot 4, Block 1, Loren Place, as recommended by the Special Assessments Committee, and subject to Policy 82-2 and a senior citizen deferment, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. PROJECT 442 ALTERNATE, BECKER ROAD, LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, KSTP ADDITION Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained to the Council that the assessments were calculated in accordance with past City policies and procedures uniformly against all similarly zoned property. However, because the apparent present use of the property is under-utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal had indicated that the increase in market value in its present state was only $25,000.00. Therefore, it was recommended that the proposed assessment be proportionately reduced according to the estimated increase in market value of $25,000.00 and that the remainder be postponed until such time that the property developed to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessments. John Bannigan, Attorney, stated they had retained their own appraiser. He stated that $25,000.00 was acceptable, however, he recommended his client not sign the agreement. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 442 Alternate (Becker Road) as it pertains to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, KSTP Addition, in the amount of $25,000.00, and authorize its certification to the County. All voted in favor. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA October 18, 1988 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, October 18, 1988, at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Vic Ellison and Councilmembers Wachter, Egan, Gustafson, and McCrea. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, City Engineer Tom Colbert, City Planner Dale Runkle, and Assistant City Attorney Michael G. Dougherty. AGENDA Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. MINUTES October 6. 1988. Councilmember Gustafson requested an addition on page 19, paragraph 4, of: "All voted in favor." He further requested the addition on page 24, paragraph 31 of: "All voted in favor." Councilmember Egan requested changes on page 15, paragraph 4, the following should be deleted "(a developer)"; and paragraph 11, the correction of a typographical error: "DeFosch" should read "DeLosch". He also requested the following changes: Page 25, the first paragraph, the correction of "Roady" to "Rorie", and page 29, last paragraph, correction of spelling of "Taubert" to "Tower". Mayor Ellison requested the correction on page 15, paragraph 6, of spelling from "Green" to "Greer". Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the minutes for the October 6, 19881 regular meeting as amended. All voted in favor. REVISE AND RENEW CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL AGREEMENT (1988-89) Public Works Director Tom Colbert informed the Council of the need to renew the snow removal agreement. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to revise and renew the contractual snow removal agreement with Bituminous Roadways for the 1988-89 season and authorize the mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCH SUMMARY AS OF: 01/06/1995 PROPERTY ID: 10-40950-020-00 SEE COMMENTS S/A# ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF CD 100009 WATER AREA 0000 01 0.0000 994.70 0.00 0.00 CL 100151 SAN SW TRK 1970 20 8.0000 609.00 0.00 0.00 CL 101804 WSSVC 442 1988 10 9.0000 1553.88 0.00 0.00 PP 102519 ST 600 1993 10 6.5000 5000.00 0.00 0.00 PP 1OP442 STORM SEWER TRUNK 0000 01 0.0000 32187.07 0.00 PN ------ SUMMARY OF LEVIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ****** 1994 P&I CERTIFIED 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF PENDING 32187.07 0.00 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF CLOSED 8157.58 Press ENTER; or F1, F4, F5, F7, F8 PROPERTY DATA SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMENTS INQUIRY :CURB 332 PROPERTY ID :NEXT 10-40950-020-00 A;;;;;;;;;2 C O M M E N T S CITY WILL COLLECT CONNECTION CHARGE FOR TRUNK STOR M SEWER AS A CONDITION OF ISSUANCE FOR BUILDING PE RMIT Press F1, F2, F5, F8 Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL bM4UTU"-"" ' y;-"*-:'`?:'' :. November 16, 1993 DAKOTA COUNY'!f•(GUT:?D)F GOVERNMENT Councilmember Hunter advised that he was appointed to the Board of the Dakota County League of Government and at their last meeting, Mark Ulfers had explained the role of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. In January, it is expected that Representative Tlm Pawlenty will discuss the Metropolitan Council. LULL COF"RATIOAj: : City Administrator Hedges explained that::# c'$adger::?t::Baren Company of Johnsonville, South Carolina, had successfully bid for acquisw-on V tba I irggRd aiDirector of Community Development Reichert said that the Badger R. Bazen Co?pi v"v'ould tiliit: cis-acquire the existing Lull Corporation building and bring it up to standards. She further explained that the company is looking to the St. Paul Port Authority for financial assistance as the Port is offering long-term, low interest financing outside the City of St. Paul within the Metro East area but only in the area of manufacturing. In addition, the Port Authority advised that the project would probably qualify for a Small Cities Grant through the Department of Trade and Economic Development. Ms. Reichert said the City hasn't always qualified in the past but because this is manufacturing and a significant number of jobs are involYed.;banes are good. The grant could involve 5250,000 to 5500,000 from DTED but the payback would 6k io: l ity.:;;The City could then use those funds in the future for additional, selected projects. In answer to a question from Coundlattm.... CaeEte "Us. Reichert stated the company would manufacture the Lull machine. The new owneTS'jielieVe tiieie is a market and they would attempt to get back the employees who worked for Lull in the yasf israve people trained at the vo-tech is its manufacture. Ms. Reichert explained that if Badger Bazen does not acquire the company, it is likely the highly-specialized building would sit vacant for many years. The Council noted no risk to the City and was enthusiastic about the acquisition. M ABBOTT Mayor Egan introduced this item as stipula6iip_of'stsftlismeat, final assessments, Project 600, Paul M. Abbott. Hunter moved, Awada seconded, a mots y¢ approv4 i$e stipulation of settlement agreement for property identified as #10.49050-010.00 and 10 45F020 00 and:" rove the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Council to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 SPECIAL ary COUNCII ETING Awada moved, Wachter seconded;.:*::* gp kt.t4E:a_fiffF ial City Council meeting for November 73, 1993, at 5:00 pm. to further discuss the Cityt Iyf4AieEpBt 9fCt ¢ ilic Safety expansion program. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MISCELLANEOUS:": Councilmember Awada advised that she and Councilmember Masin will be meeting with Anthony Caponi next week. Councilmember Masin reported that she had appeared before the Apple Valley City Council MEMO TO- HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY 1 t "j--:,- FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES -"DATE: NOVEMBER 16,1993 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA/NOVEMBER 16, 1993 CnY COUNCIL MEETING CITY ATTORNEY The City Council reserves the right to schedule an executive session for the purpose of considering pending litigation. At the present time, there are no plans for an executive session. Item L Loll Corporation Acquisition-For informative purposes, a memo is enclosed on page from Director of Community Development Reichert announcing the recent acquisition of Lull Corporation by Badger R. Bann Company of Johnsonville, South Carolina Staff, including the Director of Community Development, Assistant to the City Administrator Hobenstein and the City Administrator had been meeting with representatives of the Bazen Company prior to the November 2 auction. Item 2. MVTA Board Meeting-Enclosed on pages 12,)througb 4Wfor informative purposes is a copy of a memo from Senior Planner Marnin providing information about the October Minnesota Valley Transit meeting. Item 3. Stipulation of Settlement, Final Assessments, Project 600, Paul M. Abbott-At the time of the final assessment bearing for the above-referenced project, the City received an objection from Paul M. Abbott for property identification #'s 10-49050-010.00 and 10-40950- 020-00. Subsequently, as a part . of the City appraisal process and negotiations associated with this objection, a stipulation of settlement agreement has been prepared and approved by the property owner and is being presented to the City council for their concurrence. The settlement agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office and City staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action Enclosed on page ,Xrs a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement. This will allow the City to levy the new assessment for collection. Enclosed without page number for the Council's information is a Copy of a previleged and confidential memo from the City Attorney's office regarding this item ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the stipulation of settlement agreement for property identification #'s 1049050-010.00 and 1049050020.00 and approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Council to execute all related documents. City Administrator RECENEo NOV 15 J?v PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: City Attorney's Office DATE: November 11, 1993 RE: Assessment of KSTP Addition; Project No. 600 Our File No. 206-10997 C Paul Abbott is the owner of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Opperman Drive (formerly Becker Road) and T.H. 149. The parcels take their access from Opperman Drive. The two parcels were proposed to be assessed as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600. Please see the attached maps showing the location of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition. Project Project 600 involved widening T.H. 149 to add a 14-foot wide left turn lane and also to add two northbound lanes between Opperman Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. Prior to the Project, T.H. 149 had two 12-wide bituminous driving lanes with bituminous shoulders. The December 14, 1990, feasibility report indicates that the purpose of the Project was "to accommodate the immediate increased traffic from West Publishing and some of the longer term overall traffic growth." According to the report, the proposed main entrance from T.H. 149 to West Publishing's new facility was at the Opperman Drive intersection. Opperman Drive, which runs east and west in front of the KSTP parcels, was realigned to provide safer access to T.H. 149. Also, a traffic signal was placed at the intersection of Opperman Drive and T.H. 149. Assessment Process On November 17, 1992, Mr. Abbott filed a written objection with the City for the proposed assessments to the two KSTP parcels. The proposed assessments were as follows: 010-00 020-00 Widen Left Turn Lane $ 2,818.92 $ 3,276.18 Opperman Drive $15,225.02 $17,694.71 Traffic Light S 2.617.74 S 3,042.37 TOTAL $20,661.68 $24,013.26 i 10 In his objection, Mr. Abbott stated that he believed that the special assessment exceeded the benefit to the property and that the Project costs proposed were assessed inconsistently and inequitably among the various parcels. The Council certified the remainder of the assessment roll for Project 600 but did not certify the proposed assessments for the KSTP parcels. Appraisals In an effort to determine what might be an appropriate assessment, the City hired an appraiser to render an opinion as to the special benefit to the parcels of Project 600. The City's appraiser determined that the maximum benefit possible to the parcels combined was a total of $16,100.00. The appraisal was based on several sales of comparable parcels. The KSTP parcels are zoned light industrial. Most of the comparables were also zoned industrial. The City's appraiser believes that the Project improvements made the KSTP parcel 7% more valuable than the comparable parcels. The 7% figure is based on the appraiser's experience in the real estate field. The City's appraiser believes the area of the KSTP property will now have a greater identity with the traffic signal and vehicles will be able to take easier left turns from T.H. 149 onto Opperman Drive. The City's appraiser is of the opinion that the most likely use for the property is an owner/user type use such as small office/warehouse. The appraiser also believes the Project would have a greater benefit to the parcel if the parcel were zoned commercial and had a building that would benefit from being seen from the stop light. The property owner's appraiser believes that the parcels have received no benefit from this Project. The appraiser indicates that any benefit to the parcels is because of their proximity to West Publishing. Negotiations At trial, the City's appraiser's opinion of the maximum benefit to the two parcels together would be $16,100.00. Therefore, the highest amount that can be assessed for the parcels would be that sum of $16,100.00. In candid conversations with the City's appraiser, it is apparent that the appraiser believes the $16,100.00 is the most that could be obtained at a trial presuming the judge believes everything the City's appraiser says and totally adopts the appraiser's opinion that the parcels are valued at 7% more than the comparable sales. Upon receipt of the appraiser's opinion, the City offered the $16,000.00 figure as an assessment for the two parcels. The property owner responded with an $8,000.00 figure which, after having had discussions with the City's appraiser, seemed a somewhat attractive counteroffer. At the request of the City's Director of Public Works, however, this office countered with a $12,000.00 figure. The property 4 owner returned with a $9,000.00 figure and finally came up to a $10,000.00 sum. As you may recall, in 1990, this office tried a special assessment appeal concerning similar facts. In that case, the City assessed the Hardee's on Pilot Knob and Duckwood for the Pilot Knob improvements and streetlight at the intersection of Pilot Knob and Duckwood. That parcel was commercially zoned and as a fast food location needed a high traffic volume. After trial, the court ordered the assessment reduced by 50%. Our attorneys have discussed this matter and have also had discussions with the appraiser in determining whether to recommend this proposed settlement to the Council. This office weighed the proposed settlement against the anticipated attorney fees and expert fees that would be incurred by the City regardless of the outcome at trial and also the landowner's expert fees which the City would have to pay if the court does not support the City's $16,100.00 assessment. Acknowledging the costs of going to trial on this matter and the possible cost of the landowner's expert fees, this office recommends that the City Council approve the enclosed special assessment agreement whereby the KSTP parcels would be assessed $5,000.00 each for a total of $10,000.00. If it is convenient, please place this matter on the agenda for the November 16, 1993, Council meeting. AMM/wkt cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk I E/ HTS GLUE I C 8 F O NE NW N ' NOW , NE R. ROP I•+ rtL C+6OY+ IS e it ? ? q'Y Mi D I !U ?L J R S _ • JD + ' R'* Tv 2 s :_ rr y Q s W A swE°IiRRT ST. 9E a' s <DM SW I f SE s^- ti i a E s 5 AAO0 Y M LDIE L? rip T IL (4 Ra P. EiI 17 I (? y ` ' ' > ? = > l1D+C I 1 CLUBVI(w + f? '? ' f g gNW NE NW R N \ 1.. wo 8d E MRR RD. S ,DL PR ECT LO ATI RI ® ._:_ &LUROW DOW I - TYMIISC E-eRtll Pt. D. IIDREMr R. WREST RIWE • SW ? SE ?+ S ? " I S R' - e-MOxa00D W. ? . CI s . a- REDNODD PT. T- awncE Pr. R4 DOODLE RDSD \ -- -- l 4. RP. Re. is ¢ vf --ROSr R ao i L£A1PY PARR N CARRIAGE W MLLSCOLf s .. NE NW • BWE bRRSE "MR STREET ! C B - ©TRBIL RaT s AD. t ur r s ^ A? P ' < u W S QN ° u?d+ V @ rr LOL ? ja n ? AREA! }? EPRDERW6 OR S N ` t 11? J V F SCOTT R0. F? - OQ +P NOT TO SCALE ? • ? 4RnE ? RIDfiE NE / YW x ,,,\ 1 / i _ s. R - I 1 LOCATION MAP 12-14-90 T. H. 14 FILE No. 91104 ?? OTA EAGAN, MINNES DRG. NO. N RS NO. 600 PROD 1 NE ENGINEERS/ARCNIrEMSPLA . r -v SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Paul M. Abbott is the fee owner ("Owner") of record of certain property bearing tax identification numbers 10-40950-010-00 and 10-40950-020-00 ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-010-00, legally described as Lot 1, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive and also Trunk Highway 149, both of which were upgraded as part of the City of Eagan ("City") Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-020-00, legally described as Lot 2, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive which was upgraded as part of City Public Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, Owner served the City with an objection to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the City communicated with the Dakota County Auditor's office to delete these assessments from the tax statements of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the City and Owner have engaged in negotiations and have resolved all disputes relating to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property arising from Project No. 600. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The City shall levy a special assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel 10-40950- 010-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 2. The City shall levy an assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel no. 10-40950- 020-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 3. The Owner shall waive notice of hearing and hearing on the assessment of the Subject Property. 4. These special assessments shall be spread over a term of 10 years at an interest rate of 6.5% per annum. In the alternative, Owner may pay the special assessment within 30 days of the levy of the assessment per Minn. Stat. §429.061. CITY OF Dated: %%- ,(* , 1993 Tte Mavnr Dated: It -%6 , 1993 Dated: 1993 State of Minnesota ) )ss County of Dakota ) On this /? kday of ooc?,Ler- 1993, before me a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Thomas A. Egan and E.J. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said munioality. State of Minnesota ) JUDY M "'S DAK PUB OTF. OTr Ss fte lie My Op°" -- 97 County of Dakota ) On this aD day of 0e QyD , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Paul M. Abbott, to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. of Public ------- --------------------- s`z.. BARBARA J. DALTON u NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY My Connnlssbn E?Iree Sept 18. isoo -------- ------- - APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: // / .P /9V APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: F7/ ce Department Da d: it• iL-Q3 THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Attorney No. 4546 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 E. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-37/81 PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: City Attorney's Office DATE: November 11, 1993 RE: Assessment of KSTP Addition; Project No. 600 Our File No. 206-10997 Paul Abbott is the owner of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Opperman Drive (formerly Becker Road) and T.H. 149. The parcels take their access from Opperman Drive. The two parcels were proposed to be assessed as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600. Please see the attached maps showing the location of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition. Project Project 600 involved widening T.H. 149 to add a 14-foot wide left turn lane and also to add two northbound lanes between Opperman Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. Prior to the Project, T.H. 149 had two 12-wide bituminous driving lanes with bituminous shoulders. The December 14, 1990, feasibility report indicates that the purpose of the Project was "to accommodate the immediate increased traffic from West Publishing and some of the longer term overall traffic growth." According to the report, the proposed main entrance from T.H. 149 to West Publishing's new facility was at the Opperman Drive intersection. Opperman Drive, which runs east and west in front of the KSTP parcels, was realigned to provide safer access to T.H. 149. Also, a traffic signal was placed at the intersection of Opperman Drive and T.H. 149. Assessment Process On November 17, 1992, Mr. Abbott filed a written objection with the City for the proposed assessments to the two KSTP parcels. The proposed assessments were as follows: 010-00 020-00 Widen Left Turn Lane $ 2,818.92 $ 3,276.18 Opperman Drive $15,225.02 $17,694.71 Traffic Light S 2.617.74 S 3.042.37 TOTAL $20,661.68 $24,013.26 In his objection, Mr. Abbott stated that he believed that the special assessment exceeded the benefit to the property and that the Project costs proposed were assessed inconsistently and inequitably among the various parcels. The Council certified the remainder of the assessment roll for Project 600 but did not certify the proposed assessments for the KSTP parcels. Appraisals In an effort to determine what might be an appropriate assessment, the City hired an appraiser to render an opinion as to the special benefit to the parcels of Project 600. The City's appraiser determined that the maximum benefit possible to the parcels combined was a total of $16,100.00. The appraisal was based on several sales of comparable parcels. The KSTP parcels are zoned light industrial. Most of the comparables were also zoned industrial. The City's appraiser believes that the Project improvements made the KSTP parcel 7% more valuable than the comparable parcels. The 7$ figure is based on the appraiser's experience in the real estate field. The City's appraiser believes the area of the KSTP property will now have a greater identity with the traffic signal and vehicles will be able to take easier left turns from T.H. 149 onto Opperman Drive. The City's appraiser is of the opinion that the most likely use for the property is an owner/user type use such as small office/warehouse. The appraiser also believes the Project would have a greater benefit to the parcel if the parcel were zoned commercial and had a building that would benefit from being seen from the stop light. The property owner's appraiser believes that the parcels have received no benefit from this Project. The appraiser indicates that any benefit to the parcels is because of their proximity to West Publishing. Negotiations At trial, the City's appraiser's opinion of the maximum benefit to the two parcels together would be $16,100.00. Therefore, the highest amount that can be assessed for the parcels would be that sum of $16,100.00. In candid conversations with the City's appraiser, it is apparent that the appraiser believes the $16,100.00 is the most that could be obtained at a trial presuming the judge believes everything the City's appraiser says and totally adopts the appraiser's opinion that the parcels are valued at 7% more than the comparable sales. Upon receipt of the appraiser's opinion, the City offered the $16,000.00 figure as an assessment for the two parcels. The property owner responded with an $8,000.00 figure which, after having had discussions with the City's appraiser, seemed a somewhat attractive counteroffer. At the request of the City's Director of Public works, however, this office countered with a $12,000.00 figure. The property owner returned with a $9,000.00 figure and finally came up to a $10,000.00 sum. As you may recall, in 1990, this office tried a special assessment appeal concerning similar facts. In that case, the City assessed the Hardee's on Pilot Knob and Duckwood for the Pilot Knob improvements and streetlight at the intersection of Pilot Knob and Duckwood. That parcel was commercially zoned and as a fast food location needed a high traffic volume. After trial, the court ordered the assessment reduced by 50%. Our attorneys have discussed this matter and have also had discussions with the appraiser in determining whether to recommend this proposed settlement to the Council. This office weighed the proposed settlement against the anticipated attorney fees and expert fees that would be incurred by the City regardless of the outcome at trial and also the landowner's expert fees which the City would have to pay if the court does not support the City's $16,100.00 assessment. Acknowledging the costs of going to trial on this matter and the possible cost of the landowner's expert fees, this office recommends that the City Council approve the enclosed special assessment agreement whereby the KSTP parcels would be assessed $5,000.00 each for a total of $10,000.00. If it is convenient, please place this matter on the agenda for the November 16, 1993, Council meeting. AMM/wkt cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk - El F7 r s .? tv?G GNEILL I I (O A S ? ? S , 1 NW N , NE s{ Ci`? c4 rRO N. NOR ?. ES a .. 4 F hi < D I , ! a_ rf y B t ( S SE S i' ^ Sw !T. ON W SE O Y f y - . ? LONE l t. !T. W r 14 At M I 1 rir 1 1 l? o ° !? uevHw ? ? •D I fw E E NE VV ' ?' NE 21 • 1W NE ` s NW J1610 IT \ `V ® s B( \. a 0 ? IS PAW AD. J y G PRO JECT LO ATI 1 _ TNIeNAG :_.ADN R ,. NDAYT PT. Sw SE s ; , LI N ._ lDAE9E A DDE . CIA. . e-IRpIIYDDD LN. e- REDAQDD PT. i T• 9RAlIDE RT. AD eDDDLE MAD \ - -- - -- . 1 v. w. No. Ee f Z o I O F Z = Kt. FDST RD.D YEAR! AARK CARRIAGE z ° IRELS GOLF - CEDAR :M" :--_EET--_ NW I. COGRSE ©TAm aLr d s e R Ao. s AT a p C i } w DoE ALlflw w LAJ u Cy 2 ?. Ll GI G~ i N o n O ® g R 11 NDEAIN6 • K z VE ??7 C, swn Ao. - oo- NOT TO SCALE ?_ A IV RIDDE ,p R \ ' y,,.,./ \ F? LOCATION MAP 12-14-90 T. H. 149 FILE No. 91104 ?? MINNESOTA EAGAN , ORG. NO. NO. 600 PROJ 1 ENGINEERS I ARCN?ECTSE PLANNERS . ECLAT ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Paul M. Abbott is the fee owner ("Owner") of record of certain prcperty bearing tax identification numbers 1040950-010-00 and 1040950-020-00 ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, parcel 1040950-010-00, legally described as Lot 1, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive and also Trunk Highway 149, both of which were upgraded as part of the City of Eagan ("City") Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-020-00, legally described as Lot 2, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive which was upgraded as part of City Public Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, Owner served the City with an objection to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the City communicated with the Dakota County Auditor's office to delete these assessment from the tax statements of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the City and Owner have engaged in negotiations and have resolved all disputes relating to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property arising from Project No. 600. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The City shall levy a special assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel 10-40950- 010-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 2. The City shall levy an assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel no. 10-40950- 020-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 3. The Owner shall waive notice of hearing and hearing on the assessment of the Subject Property. 4. These special assessments shall be spread over a term of 10 years at an interest rate of 6.5% per annum. In the alternative, Owner may pay the special assessment within 30 days of the levy of the assessment per Minn. Stat. 5429.061. Dated: 1993 CITY OF EAGAN, By: Thomas A. Egan Its Mayor Dated: , 1993 Dated: , 1993 State of Minnesota County of Dakota By: EJ. VanOverbeke Its City Cl k` Paul Abbott M. )ss On this day of , 1993, before me a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Thomas A. Egan and EJ. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf cf said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public State of Minnesota ) )ss Co._nty of Dakota ) On this W day of 00A AD , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Paul M Abbott, to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Ndiluy Public , BARBARA J. DALTON y? RWARY PUBLIC-WNNBBOTA oaKOra coU Mr co ear EWm e•w ,9. JOW APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Finance Department Dated: THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Attorney No. 4546 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 E. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-3781 1{09 v of eaaan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 VIC ELLISON EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA September 22, 1988 THEODORE WACHTER Co.m l Members THOMAS HEDGES Ciry Aeminwrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE MR PAUL M ABBOTT Clry Clerk 3504 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123 Re: lints 1 &.2, Block 1, KSTP Addition Project 442 Alt., Special Assessment Objection Dear Mr. Abbott: On June 30, the Special Assessment Committee met to review your objections to the proposed assessments of $23,782.19 for Lot 1, and $32,187.07 for Lot 2 for the improvements associated with Project 442 Alt., UPS Addition (Streets & Utilities). Enclosed is a copy of that portion of the minutes pertaining to your objection. You will note that the Committee recommended that the combined total assessment of $55,969.26 be reduced to $25,000. These comments and recommendations Council for formal consideration and 6, 1988. If you have any additional to have considered by the Council, attention no later than October 3, forwarded to the Council in a timely ,rill be forwarded to the City action on Thursday, October comments that you would like please forward them to my 1988, so that they can be manner. Sincerely, ,wl',y4-. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk Enclosure THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY I , SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OO44ITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PACE 8 Creegan moved, Egan seconded the motion to reaffirm the assessment of $7,059.60 subject to reduction under Special Assessment Policy 82-2 to $4,706.40 upon the appropriate execution of documents and for the further deferment of the reduced assessment under the Senior Citizens Deferment Ordinance. All voted in favor. ALOIS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, KSTP ADDITION PAUL ABBOTT Public Works Director Colbert stated that Project 442 ALT. provided for the upgrading of Becker Road with City utilities and upgrading from a gravel rural ditch County road to an urban commercial/industrial street. Total proposed assessment obligations against Lots 1 and 2 of the KSTP Addition amount of $55,969.26 rather than the amount referenced in the property owner's written objection. Because the apparent present use of the property is under utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal has indicated that the increase in market value in its present state is only $25,000.00. The remainder should be postponed until such time as the property develops to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. John Bannigan, Attorney with Bannigan & Kelly, appeared representing Paul Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that there is no increase in the fair market value of the property owned by his client and that if the City intended to assess his client the $55,900.00, the fair market value needed to increase by $55,900.00. Mr. Bannigan indicated that the 1985 tax statements as prepared by the County Assessor's Office for both lots showed a market value of $85,400.00. In 1988 after completion of the project, the County Assessor's market value is stated at $103,200.00. Mr. Bannigan asserted that much of that $17,800.00 increase is due to general market value increase for Eagan in general, together with general inflation. Mr. Bannigan indicated that present Minnesota law allows the property owner to submit the County estimated market values as evidence of the value of the given property. Mr. 8annigan questioned the appraisal conducted by Dahlen & Dwyer on behalf of the City and in particular the wording that the assessments were approximately $25,000.00 can be substantiated for the property. He ?ointed out that the language is not an appraisal and may be hedging on thY'part of Mr. Dwyer. Mr. Bannigan stated that the burden on the City is to prcva that the proposed assessment is directly attributable to the benefits provided to the property from the project. Mr. Bannigan indicated that his client would not voluntarily sign any agreement to pay an additional $30,000.00 over the $25,000.00 set forth in the Dahlen & Dwyer appraisal, let alone accept the figure proposed by Dahlen & Dwyer. In response to inquires from Twaddell, Director of Public works Colbert indicated that the County Assessor's Office may not have been on the site or been aware of the recent improvements when setting its market value. Mr. Bannigan indicated that under the County Assessor's valuations, the interior of the two lots increased by $5,000.00 and the corner lot increased by $12,100.00. In + SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 30, 1988 PACE 9 conclusion, Mr. Bannigan indicated that out of the $17,800.00, the City would have to ferret out how much was borne by market conditions, general inflation, etc. versus that which is directly attributable to the public improvements benefitting the property. Committee Member Egan inquired,of Mr. Bannigan whether or not to resolve all matters, if Mr. Barmigan would accept the $17,800.00 figure Mr. Bannigan indicated that he would need to discuss that with his client, but if he were to say 'yes', that would be premised on the waiver of the City of all future hook-up charges, especially those that may be imposed against a future owner who wants to hook-up to the water system. At this point, Mr. Bannigan would not recommend to his client the acceptance of any figure in excess of the combined increase shown on the tax statements shown by the County. Public Works Director Colbert indicated that it is only fair that if it is determined that there is no benefit for the water main being adjacent to the property, that at some future date they wanted to hook into the water main, that they should pay a connection charge. Mr. Bannigan indicated that the waiver of connection charges was only in response to the committee member's inquiry as to the acceptance of the $17,800.00 figure by Mr. Abbott. Mr. Bannigan indicated that if a recommendation were made to the Council to negotiate a settlement at $17,800.00, it must be understood to mean that the City would waive any future connection charges imposed upon this or any future owner. Committee Member Egan indicated that due to the large discrepancy between the Ddhlen & Dwyer appraisal and the $17,800.00, it would be difficult for him to recommend a settlement at $17,800.00. Committee Member Merkley inquired as to how many or what appraisal is determinative as to the benefitted amount. Committee member Egan and Director of Public Works Colbert indicated that it is the most creditable. Mr. Creegan expressed concern regarding the language used by Dwyer in the appraisal and inquired whether or not that could be made more clear. Creegan moved, Egan seconded, the motion to recommend that the proposed assessment be reduced to $25,000.00. All voted in favor. Creegan moved, Egan seconded the motion to amend the previously adopted recommendation to include as part of the recommendation that the remainder of the total proposed assessment be postponed until such time as the property developes to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of the assessment. All voted in favor. PARCEL 10-2100-010-07/TODD & ELLEN r W Z Director of Public Works Colbert stated that under Project 455 the City installed the watexmain and storm sewer utilities along with upgrading Deerwood Drive from its previous gravel road rural ditch section to an urban street with concrete sidewalks and trailways between 35E and Pilot Knob Road. The property qualifies under Special Assessment Policy 86-3 because of its characteristics as a large unplatted property. Under the terms of the policy OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 July 12, 1988 MR DAN DWYER DAHLEN & DWYER INC 1260 NORWEST CENTER TOWER ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Appraisal For,Lots.l/& 2, Block 1, KSTP Aadtion ; Project 442 Alternate _ Becker Road (Streets & Utilities - Assessment Appeal) Dear Dan: VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER c MH Members THOMAS HEDGES Gty Mminietrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city clan On March 30, you forwarded to my attention a "preliminary" appraisal of the property referenced above located at 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan MN. In that preliminary appraisal, you indicated that you felt that assessments of "approximately $25,000" can be substantiated for the property. Based on the comments presented at the Special Assessment Committee meeting of June 30, it appears that we will need a more formal appraisal specifically defining the maximum increase in value to the property associated with the benefits received from this particular project. Therefore, please complete the full written appraisal and submit it to my attention as soon as possible so that we can proceed with our resolution of this assessment objection. Your anticipated prompt response will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 9.4- p '? Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mike Dougherty, City Attorney THE LONE OAK TREE ...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY .. city of eogon THOMAS EGAN Mayor - PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER - SANDRA A. MASIN March 16 1995 THEODORE WACHTER , Council Members JOHN BANNIGAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW THOMAS HEDGES BANNIGAN 8t KELLY, P.A. - CBy AdndnWrotor 1750 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER E. J. VAN OVERBEKE c3y clerk 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST PAUL, MN 55101 Re: Paul Abbott; Lots 1 and 29 Block 1,9S'TP Addition PID Nos. 10-40950-010-00 and 10-40950-020-00 Dear I& Bannigan: It has come to my attention that when the above-referenced parcels were sold in 1993, your client as the seller, was requested to escrow monies covering two pending assessments that had turned up in a title search. The title search apparently uncovered a pending assessment for $20,661.68 for Project No. 600 on Parcel 010-00. The $20,661.68 pending assessment for Parcel 010-00 was reduced to $5,000 in settlement of a special assessment lawsuit. That agreement was reached in November of 1993 and the City's records were adjusted accordingly at the time. The $5,000 assessment for Project No. 600 has been paid. As of November 21, 1994, no pending assessment shows on the City's records for Parcel 010-00. The second pending assessment listed in the title search was $32,187.07 for scorn sewer trunk from Project No. 442 for Parcel 020-00. Although this sum is listed in City records as a "pending assessment," it was not a levied nor pending assessment pursuant to MN Statute Chapter 429. What is intended to be conveyed by the notation "pending assessment," is notice to a prospective buyer of the property, that the City intends to pursue collection of cash connection charges as provided by MN Statute 1444.075 and Eagan City Code Section 3.07 at such time as the parcel connects to the utility. The label of the sum as a "pending assessment" is a notice provision only and does not denote a levied assessment. We will be removing this notation from the City's records. Sincerely, " 40 `Gy o . El. VanOverbeke Finance Director/City Clerk EJV/vmd MUNICIPAL CENIER 3530 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 601-4600 FAX (612) 6814612 TDD:(612)454.8536 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/AtllrmatNe Action Employer MAINTENANCE FACILITY 35D1 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX: (6M 6814360 TDD:(612)454.8535 es, a VII. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) E. PROJECT 442 ALT., BECKER ROAD (STREETS & UTILITIES) 2. Paul Abbott (Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 KSTP Addition) BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project 442 Alt. provided for the upgrading of Becker Road (formerly County Road 63A) with City utilities and upgrading from a gravel rural ditch County road to an urban commercial/industrial street. This project was originally approved by Council action on May 21, 1985 with construction being completed during the early part of 1987 and the final assessment hearing held on September 15, 1987. Enclosed on page 1W is a written objection submitted by the property owner at the time of this final as essment public hearing. Enclosed on pages _IID7_ through are maps referencing the property to the improvements under this project and also calculations used to age a at the final assessment amount. Also enclosed on pages through -/? is an excerpt of the appraisal performed for t City of Eagan to determine the monetary benefits received by the property as a result of these improvements. It should be noted that the total proposed assessment obligations against Lots 1 & 2 of the KSTP Addition amount $55,969.26 rather than the amount referenced in the property owners written objection. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The assessments were calculated in accordance with past City policies and procedures uniformally against all similarly zoned property. However, because the apparent present use of the property is under-utilized from its allowable zoning, the City's appraisal has indicated that the increase in market value in its present state is only $25,000.00. Therefore, it is recommended that the proposed assessment be proportionately reduced according to the estimated increase in market value of $25,000.00 and that the remainder be postponed until such time that the property develops to a higher or more intense use which would then reactivate the postponed portion of these assessments. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS: fos OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT I, Paul M Abbott, hereby make this objection to assessments as provided in M.S. 429.061. I object to the planned assessments by the City of Eagan against my property at 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan, legally described as Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota. I believe the property identification numbers are 10-40950-010 and 10-40950-020. The grand total of planned assessments by the City of Eagan against my property at this time appears to be $60,716.81. I object to the assessment because my property was not benifited, I did not want the improvments, the planned assessments were not based on the benifits to the respective owners, and the planned assessments is unconstitutional, since it is far more than the benifit to my property. ???.P'f? Paul M. Abbott ?7- P 2v -T 11Y Z -W- ?n1 c? Q V 0 = = r g el a ,-, CCL i Ir C dom Fla . ` I '? , I RI / ?. 1 Rlq?.. ???.? R4-.? 1H1. UJ!' ? , PI l RI 'n1 I o' 7 7 4 R I R _ R 1 ` tr RI ? ? l, ? - ' ?`?- 1 a ? ? I ? ? V 4 " . _ p_ '•, ?I< .ESC ; 1.?I ? . ?Rl a-11 l=Y ? ? '/ C8 (L? 1- ?a` s 1:a .. D F?p?7- _ I R-IL- R II -•__. '. _. _ .I I ??, t 1 1 \?I - R'd ?:A Rill RII I I a,1? S J /7 y r• rr /? s ? L3 CB ?' 3i ___. lY VI i P ,I1 LI j R 1 ." t B..II r o t R ul! R 1. Rlf I I I ), 1-I R...I ICKIFJt=._ 11 Ri C :. RIII 1 ?I R-I I SK I , ? '. RI ' ? RI ? t I C` P ° I • ? , ill ?RII P ? ?a 411 4 1. t I _ ?? ? ? ' I ' 9 R.I rP C?? ; iJ ? L - - 17 ?I I I P A 1 j I, n F?J I ?t? = i 1 1 I R-11 , RR R-11 I L iND USL GUI 0L PL AM 1 RFiICm•I rIAL R-1 sim.,flt Ral r J its Ctntiel !1cv't crd m /I -ply 62.r. ;°_r9 R .N I 1 1' f o l . _ .. LS r' td bu -nt NS re rbarroW ba9'ntss G0 n MI b.zn ss CSC cc r+ / r cerg a:ncer nS rc.Ji b am„s OPEN SPAC P parks ,v sl publlc F M FS.Scncol s FS3. 1731) CITY OF EAGAN t' • ?. • 6/fir S E.C 13, • PARK' I S Mzx DITION y 'a rt .I '3,'F r ro dab ii d •A W I I ae-ea A S (1 N C of r ao. 1a O ? ? ?. ?•vClWY. L YG I r•xr or T?F ' ae. 1r ?i .? a •Y'.i lY"• evil ve 46 27. R 2T s Lr s "C4 A 1, PLC C 9? ? e n ` .c- \ yo p r /o S o Y: b . )1100 y ? p ?:? ,? .? '?, , ion ,U?. `?y N ??$ YCI r7 : ti ? •. ?dI :w. AW 1 t :`} alga li i t !-. r° ?-,,h??^I.i't~ r'f?? /?' :r' r ? ?.?/ yc- V f ? '. tiV' Ct t Pl„t Ott A a Ty r r ', t tt GrY ? ?r 5 r/,.. r '' Ji k ? ?+?V .?.?.,,y'y` fi3?'-r y{•''7 ?Y, t ? ,r?? + BaL i S t i` r °?..-...,'.?/? r/r ? M + / :'it? 4•i'lr , t R ? - ?1d'S^'4Yv. rr7 ?f ?- , 1 1 I n d .Y! r va a ? »,a? Y'L` *r'1 : t ? h ..? R b 7 i r t ?s f A rt ' Y .Sr ? Ir) ? > ?i y I ,1{ i] ? JY t ray's' r Ilf?l. F 7 7ri ?C' e,Y ?M, r tY(1 s .. rx.iar ? '?+` t > 1 i t„ M>a t #Ntt ?S ?yJ,.y rte 1.1{;3J,Gr ^„ i k ??! rl rt '? ,p"a (?''"' '.?t 1 i I'j ?r rY ti? (.t ? 1.; 1 7 h° +Lit a "r i? Y a4 r4 Yg rye plf' rr'7''a 9w ? , ?„'1? Ic •1• .. I.i,s _ r ? tr'? ni' IN ? t 4\ r. d1! ° f ftt ?f ° v` r ? I rrt 'S •C?ib. r&k J t. v f,!J.y. 1 i M1aR r t b - e1??! r;p ? J- y FY f rt Q>,' ??+ •r L ar' ?i trF{ L.T4i %r7 ?) ?.t Yt'(fl yTpe ?o,L:?,t riAT y1 .%'; . t<A# if t 3 T C ! r,.: -y?lbizr! W' v -r^ ARK ?=Jvtr.?r`M''' 'e>?,,(?'.'C4^5 f? ^< 'r 5 a V" , t?.? +b ?t 1 TMt S t Y• v/153y r i?/s° r!% #?> ?.t?,?j1+??a p+??/. ry1 y? .,?1 t (\ tt ?r rl• I'vW 1 '.,i 7..4t t4W +'1? r i(`1t 6 iJl IA 3 ?i -,r. rf uS ; ff? g'..' Y 1A t •?: 1 ?Y (ysit K`.Sf µT?` }U7 ft, `i1f w A i 'P 17 ? V r tf?? / f ? 1 ?ft'l 'F 1 u r 1 1:Y351? t. .j.•t7?n??G I ii R'4. N+?'ri -!!lnCCCS dgiR ?V i ° °' .l1'1' i. „° ,. ?r •'?ic! y. ? y, t}.'eft i t': wy :1 ?-?????b.,/M ''.??? _ _ ..i r,:. ,'.N. ?' ar ;r ' i°f ,f ..' .+.i ?a. ...r?-. `t%•,;?.I ,• ?1? s ? t wr!. ! .-"-r js" +'? ?:i r'... e - :4?-,?r n r.r r S `1 t a y.. A + r > `soy fy.. k4`r / r •' I+• K ? • ?y,•? ?+' .y t''`,?v '?? ?1?' Y' r ,11r ' ' ??'.. ? ?+?Y?. 1. FliV..e{{', T r ri> r> y r^f .r^°'' J;. S,r / R rt ,?' c?'> y ! / r eJ '7'.$! «.; ttY. ui i f ? ?Y/?r''X.'???r > ??w?i? 5f71 Swr L.'j?t'y _ t Y? i,,. •.!'L"•" - ? f rJ. ??3/d/? V? tyY??./.>?'l = ?. T r •f'?1 Y t1 ? uQ'Y`'? ? ?.' A?' ? r ? u r r i... ?>}ry?C /, "`"' .? ? f. .?.Y ??fr?rx???X i?J.'? "'J?i•?• ?:.. ??n?1'(? ??;? rA +?r 1 r b'.e. F1.-l " OBI .';+' 'I?' "b .> ?d ,???'7?'fl.T?'iiy3'?yY' ?Jf•J ...-. ?Y Cr i ? [L?'??r yY r'V' f :.+1`7 i?(i.. r . ' .,eJ S'' + a>•"yd °M?'r v •y0? tir F Sq 3 yth4 i.,t e x rk. r ? i .r? 'yr [ PI °'+4 +.'' y!r•' :J" ^ *> ^ ' Ain+,r -.,- 9?i{ r,?' ,,, °N n .I'Z,r. .????Jl•; :i F i 1 ? ? ` r1J v%t tf? ?7 ?.,,r?r'r y?_',Y?' °?r??s. '??+1+ l', ..? 5 rt° xs .1S 1hL - ? pr, ? ???' :A? ?.yl„i ? ? ? q'LJ+Sr y i'?? ar?.+.?A a ' r f 11 I. ?' ? ? '> 1 1:! S b'? ? S •i r '4rrH Fv ? ?pyK.. ? ?i„ i .` .ytW.t Jr '?'"' , 'fir +F S'a?Wr, y 4s f'f+. (1° 1 'i ° j?s F4'r; p?l 5 e ?,yR1 ?J r?TynG ' 2'? ivy#'4? y. ?. .flJ'f r ? yl ? :' a fil f t f YI7f ?° ? r -0, ov,'Y?Mf+' J !_' Aa ..fi - ('' fbr,?+1 5T ..?f t° k'rp 4{Ft5,5' ? a-. 1 ?i ? - ,/ ?` f?C" ? P/"?.?!'?%'•V...+ Y'uMr :? rt Vr?, ' i??jl ( 9.? i ? e! i ; i??}?)[??s ?4? rtI J? -4 IX ? s3."i ? v ti t 1{ 4 fl A: r '.il*A2,P" b 1 t A ?t n `2' '?[iYy't??-''.y>t' ?'"?/.? __" 3 w. #ps (, ?j?/ Y >.'M' ? .?'r?r"??` .r ?AAAy 5.?t.;1 y.,y,V(Lw i7'% A'?r'i t?'''???i j•r ? (.•T ? wr alp; N°-'s 1?.. fa 9i,rl•ry'r f?y /H+('. r.?• y wj+lt^„? t'{rJ'.?''r 7?a #tttT??£1 r?'?r'`e A ix+???%'?J f, ,. ,., r,,y ? ,. '^>?- ".,"? .(_? ;.? }?a ?° a,r t #'i rte•t:I b{? > tt /r ,r ??/-v??-"" •r? d?_.?j r a- .r py, Tt. r tt14 1 t r;• s s.? ', f .y r. ?i Yt ° 7 r I'r I ? ? V ?`i'f yyy j. ? rr y S f sl t{a9 n dL t, x. 1 7 1 v 1 ,} ?+}?. frJr ?.?Ar???!'????!? ?.J ??N%??? .t ??i lta,?, t 7: 7 r 7F.7•-? ?I rl1. f r?u-.I?t f P:Ar3'y? r'J A'n'iY=? ?,?''?? r^' 'T 5..,?i°r S..+ Yr ? ? ?•? ('?' (ri 1 er IV(} r 7(I?f g e ?f; tt.. nnr 1 t .f e?i ?!iY?v' '@`.+,. t ?t h P r• ?s, rirt 1 .1 ?y?Rg grtsi {Ili k.j? c?T.. {t 1 .. ,..iA = -::%"'r,Y Uy -?> ? . ` ,+?`r M9a7?? ^?i...?.?, ?"'?'-t•,?` car f. ,1?J-F,3t :p i 11 ;??Il f 1, ) - `r } ?' t ;""?, ?.$;" W?: tl ?(,`?`?*?Y''L 31. y . ,? . i r- 7 I-0 16 13 U 10 4 12 II 5 h 010-05 NWL=844.0 HWL=866.0 T. _ W POND GP-5 MH-103---------- MI-1-102 EXIST. EX.MH-16 M. H.6 { EX.M - 6 \O"?- N ? ` PQQ 'f LOT I BLOCK I \)Q. 2 010-00 LOR w J 3 S ? S?C? ° 11-00 NOTE: COMPACT ALL K T P FILL BENEATH i s PIPES TO 98% 1 2 OF MAXIMUM air---mss ' DENSITY I i' I PROFILE ELEVATION CO. HWY. 63A 010-03 STo !LM W I > O 1 ? EX.MH-1 CBMH-101 ;POtld. NWL=860.0 HWL = 870.0 (.MH-12 MH-104 I > W 20-0 Z {2" 54C Sewaa 4AYo v r 71- K ST P NOTE: SAVE SHRUBS 0+50 TO 3+00 LT. I. 1 ? P^ 0+70 STSTA. WET TAP 16* X 8" TEE W/ B" G.V. B BOX • I+00 BEGIN .?' DITCH 61 SUBJECT NRCtLs 2 4+40 41'- 8" D.I.P. 8" G.V. B BOX TEMPORARY B" PLUG CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT NOTE, ---40' - 12` C.M.P. SOD DITCH 10 5 W 111 IDE END 691.8 ?- -1.00 % - DITCH AT CURB 10 V. 1-. J 1 11,".i 1 LOT -_?-?_ 843 _P. -_•_-__• _ 33 v ,P 10. -__-^FS=--?h. r._--- 12`RC. -:2 - ', . {•o, 6 - MH-108, p . $3,yX /? - 1991 1,625 L.F. - 8'• D.I-P.- - - 20-12" R.C.P. ?? `A° - \y EA. W g??TT?? - O I ECONSTRUCT EX. SANITARY M'H TO MATCH PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION. / \\\ ''•`?• NOTE: Q EX. ROAD", C PROPOSED ROAD 0 0+00 ?F 9y O -f1 py " EX. 10 O.I.P, fpFCE MAIN ,1088. _ - T IS' v.3 TO PRB +N9 4+40 010-03 7+80 8" CROSS 8" TEE . 25' B" D.I.P. .27' - B" D. 1. P. I 8" G. V. 8 BOX 8" G.V. B BOX 8" PLUG ° 8" PLUG NOTE /NSULAT£ FORCE MAIN 3 +00 TO 9 11, 00 I i COUNTY ROAD No. 63A. a ---- - ; -?- -- ?- - - i { -- ' - -? -- 884.4 Cams ; f MH 108 CO.6 8 ST. STA.. +10 LT. ST STA. 7+5 I ' ' I d .,?.. '/ j_:.._.._ .?.,.::... 4145"V- 12" R.C.P - 20 112 -Rt CC:S4°?2-`42.75% cZ_ Cl 5 pre•S3 SUMI4ARY FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL UPS 1ST ADDITION PROJECT N0. 442 Water-main ALTERNATE Storm Sewer Parcel Lateral Lateral Description Benefit Lateral From Trun Benefit k Services F Lateral rom Trunk Obligation Trunk Area Street IE 1/4, Section 13 020-03 010-05 $ 1,446.56 $ 304.57 $ 2,351.30 $ 3,841.92 $ 7,564.14 25,924.32 UPS 1st Addition Lot 1, Bloc( 1 Outlot A Outlot B 12,440.30 $9,129.99 1,553.88 20,221.21 132,147.50 49,858.42 3,726.43 98,535.50 KSTP Addition ZO Lot 1 2,570.40 swooLot 2 3,093.38 1,553.88 Yorktown Industrial Park South (Formerly 010-03) Outlot A 15,266.63 4,661.64 Loren Plac 011-0 040-0 ? 050-00 051-00 Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 1st Addition Block 1 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 9 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 12 Lot 13 Lot 16 4,178.09 5,028.18 24,815.30 $8,637.19 3,592.80 6,336.00 86,211.22 4,140.00 7,059.60 1,800.00 1,080.00 494.64 1,826.57 1,938.89 2,452.82 497.52 1,740.60 3,976.92 6,805.37 4,006.80 3,204.72 13,440.90 16,175.63 79,830.81 Total Assessment $ 15,508.49 25,924.32 274,028.38 49,858.42 3,726.43 23,782.19010=? 32,187.07016? 219,422.79 4,140.00 7,059.60 1,800.00 1,080.00 494.64 1,826.57 1,938.89 2,452.82 497.52 1,740.60 3,976.92 6,805.37 4,006.80 3,204.72 TOTALS: $34,817.27 $9,129.99 $8,073.97 $56,594.08 $8,637.19 $352,663.06 $215,546.98 $685,462.54 L DAHLEN & DWYER, INC. 1260 NORWEST CENTER TOWER • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 224-1381 DWIGHT W. DAHLEN, MAI, SREA KRISTINE L. AWADA DANIEL E. DWYER WILLIAM E. PETERSEN BEVERLY H. DWYER JOHN B.KROPP MICHAEL J. BETTENDORF, MAI JEFFREY R. LANGEVIN MARC E. KNOCHE March 30, 1988 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public: Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. Colbert: In accordance with your request, I have made an inspection and a preliminary appraisal of the property located at 3504 Dodd Road, Eagan, Minnesota. The purpose of this preliminary appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest in the property and to determine the benefits, if any, accruing to the property as a result of City of Eagan Project #442. I have analyzed the value of the property before the installation of utility and street improvements and the value of the property after the installation of utility and street improvements and feel that the proposed special assessments of $55,969.26 cannot be supported or substantiated in their (:ntirety. It is felt that assessments of approximately $25,000 can be substantiated for the property. It is possible that the remainder of the assessments could be deferred until that time when Lot 2 is sold and developed separately. At the present both Lot 1 and Lot 2 are being used as a single-site. Since this is a somewhat remote section of Eagan, land values have not kept pace with other areas in Eagan having better convenience to amenities. West Publishing has a satellite office/warehouse facility on the westerly side of Highway 149 and the UPS Company has a major facility on the east side of Highway 1.49 which abuts the subject property to the east. In May of 1985 UPS purchased approximately 86.36 acres for $1,394,735 or $0.34/S.F. This equates to slightly over $15,000/acre. Since this time UPS has bought other parcels in the immediate area. Yorktown Development Owns a large parcel of land at the southeasterly corner of Highway 149 and Becker Road. This has recently been plattecl into small acreage sites and is being offered at $1.25/S.F. A 2.9 acre parcel, located immediately to the north of the subject property, is on the market for $150,000 or $1.19/S.F. There is an older house and two garages on the property which would more than likely be razed if and when the property is sol iol evelopment. 15 The subject property was originally a power plant which was constructed in 1925. There are several buildings on the site all of which are in below average condition and repair. It is felt that it would be the contention of the present owner that although the site is platted into two lots it is being used as a single parcel for his business and, in light of its usage and land values in the area, the proposed assessments would be excessive. In the before situation the property is served by sanitary sewer along Highway 149 and bituminous roadway. In the after situation the property is now served by an 8" diameter water main, storm sewer, and an upgraded County Road 63A or Becker Road. In the before situation County Road 63A or Becker Road had an 18' wide gravel surface. In the after situation this road now has a 9-ton design and a 40' wide bituminous surface with concrete curb and gutter. It is recommended that the City of Eagan try to negotiate benefits in the amount of $25,000 and propose that the remainder of the assessments be deferred until that time when Lot 2 is sold and developed separately. It should be clearly understood that this letter constitutes only a statement of the final value estimate, and that said value has been based upon a complete written appraisal. The written appraisal, although in rough form, has been prepared and retained in my files. Should you require a more formal report, the same is available to you upon request. I hereby certify that I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this report and that I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this report or the parties involved and that the amount of the fee is not contingent upon reporting a predetermined value or upon the amount of the value estimate. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in the written appraisal, upon which the analysis, opinions and conclusions are based, are true and correct subject to the special and limiting conditions contained therein and that no one other than the undersigned prepared the analyses, conclusions and opinions concerning real estate that are set forth in the written appraisal. Yours very tru y, D HLfiN & DWYE , INC. Daniel E. Dwyer 0 DED/bjs D RECFfft Noy 15 1v f PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: City Attorney's Office DATE: November 11, 1993 RE: Assessment of KSTP Addition; Project No. 600 Our File No. 206-10997 C ? Paul Abbott is the owner of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Opperman Drive (formerly Becker Road) and T.H. 149. The parcels take their access from Opperman Drive. The two parcels were proposed to be assessed as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600. Please see the attached maps showing the location of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition. Project Project 600 involved widening T.H. 149 to add a 14-foot wide left turn lane and also to add two northbound lanes between Opperman Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. Prior to the Project, T.H. 149 had two 12-wide bituminous driving lanes with bituminous shoulders. The December 14, 1990, feasibility report indicates that the purpose of the Project was "to accommodate the immediate increased traffic from West Publishing and some of the longer term overall traffic growth." According to the report, the proposed main entrance from T.H. 149 to West Publishing's new facility was at the Opperman Drive intersection. Opperman Drive, which runs east and west in front of the KSTP parcels, was realigned to provide safer access to T.H. 149. Also, a traffic signal was placed at the intersection of Opperman Drive and T.H. 149. Assessment Process On November 17, 1992, Mr. Abbott filed a written objection with the City for the proposed assessments to the two KSTP parcels. The proposed assessments were as follows: 010-00 020-00 Widen Left Turn Lane $ 2,818.92 $ 3,276.18 Opperman Drive $15,225.02 $17,694.71 Traffic Light S 2,617.74 S 3,042.37 TOTAL $20,661.68 $24,013.26 In his objection, Mr. Abbott stated that he believed that the special assessment exceeded the benefit to the property and that the Project costs proposed were assessed inconsistently and inequitably among the various parcels. The Council certified the remainder of the assessment roll for Project 600 but did not certify the proposed assessments for the KSTP parcels. appraisals In an effort to determine what might be an appropriate assessment, the City hired an appraiser to render an opinion as to the special benefit to the parcels of Project 600. The City's appraiser determined that the maximum benefit possible to the parcels combined was a total of $16,100.00. The appraisal was based on several sales of comparable parcels. The KSTP parcels are zoned light industrial. Most of the comparables were also zoned industrial. The City's appraiser believes that the Project improvements made the KSTP parcel 7% more valuable than the comparable parcels. The 7% figure is based on the appraiser's experience in the real estate field. The City's appraiser believes the area of the KSTP property will now have a greater identity with the traffic signal and vehicles will be able to take easier left turns from T.H. 149 onto Opperman Drive. The City's appraiser is of the opinion that the most likely use for the property is an owner/user type use such as small office/warehouse. The appraiser also believes the Project would have a greater benefit to the parcel if the parcel were zoned commercial and had a building that would benefit from being seen from the stop light. The property owner's appraiser believes that the parcels have received no benefit from this Project. The appraiser indicates that any benefit to the parcels is because of their proximity to West Publishing. Negotiations At trial, the City's appraiser's opinion of the maximum benefit to the two parcels together would be $16,100.00. Therefore, the highest amount that can be assessed for the parcels would be that sum of $16,100.00. In candid conversations with the City's appraiser, it is apparent that the appraiser believes the $16,100.00 is the most that could be obtained at a trial presuming the judge believes everything the City's appraiser says and totally adopts the appraiser's opinion that the parcels are valued at 78 more than the comparable sales. Upon receipt of the appraiser's opinion, the City offered the $16,000.00 figure as an assessment for the two parcels. The property owner responded with an $8,000.00 figure which, after having had discussions with the City's appraiser, seemed a somewhat attractive counteroffer. At the request of the City's Director of Public Works, however, this office countered with a $12,000.00 figure. The property owner returned with a $9,000.00 figure and finally came up to a $10,000.00 sum. As you may recall, in 1990, this office tried a special assessment appeal concerning similar facts. In that case, the City assessed the Hardee's on Pilot Knob and Duckwood for the Pilot Knob improvements and streetlight at the intersection of Pilot Knob and Duckwood. That parcel was commercially zoned and as a fast food location needed a high traffic volume. After trial, the court ordered the assessment reduced by 50%. Our attorneys have discussed this matter and have also had discussions with the appraiser in determining whether to recommend this proposed settlement to the Council. This office weighed the proposed settlement against the anticipated attorney fees and expert fees that would be incurred by the City regardless of the outcome at trial and also the landowner's expert fees which the City would have to pay if the court does not support the City's $16,100.00 assessment. Acknowledging the costs of going to trial on this matter and the possible cost of the landowner's expert fees, this office recommends that the City Council approve the enclosed special assessment agreement whereby the KSTP parcels would be assessed $5,000.00 each for a total of $10,000.00. If it is convenient, please place this matter on the agenda for the November 16, 1993, Council meeting. AMM/wkt cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk i E/ HTS •l?' dRE1LL t = E.7 1 0 ? 1 o NE NW T N * NW MOP' W. NE C I• f? UMY O vi r s R ! - 4.L 0 ?* tv f s a_ zr y 5 „ g\y,Emit IT. r SE? ?i toy, SW T SE C r _ a !, per • 'E M P c& ?sf ?°' LawE IL IT w + ?r 4UBViFW $ ? 14 Ra .2t1 * 10.0 I l` k f? 'i ' NE g . gltW NE c NW ` ? T IT NE ? ® ; . i I PARR Ro. z .__ t = PR ' ECT LO AT1 ; A : _ GRW D 1 _ SW SE S " EA Q : c?. . l-!lR1112 K. oooola Rao \ c CR. R!. FN-.Zs RT PROW CARR,ASE IRI[SCOLE i NW a i1 y? COURSE STREET i *! t - ?RAIL rRi -i60f1. ur c u ? W oo s VP?• ? TT ? a o i ' ?^WJ u ?y O ? n ` "em OFRN16 * 75 ? R s u. 9 ICOn j RO. IF.? ' S ?"P 0 Cw NOT TO SCALE , ????gg??qq,,??,???, , IYLL Ri00E NEV9 \ . LOCATION MAP 12-14-90 H. 149 FILE NO. 91104 A EAGAN MINNESOT , DRC. NO. N NO. 600 PROD 1 ERS ENC/NFERS•ARCNITEMEPLAN . . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Paul M. Abbott is the fee owner ("Owner") of record of certain property bearing tax identification numbers 10-40950-010-00 and 10-40950-020-00 ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-010-00, legally described as Lot 1, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive and also Trunk Highway 149, both of which were upgraded as part of the City of Eagan ("City") Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-020-00, legally described as Lot 2, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive which was upgraded as part of City Public Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, owner served the City with an objection to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the City communicated with the Dakota County Auditor's office to delete these assessments from the tax statements of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the City and Owner have engaged in negotiations and have resolved all disputes relating to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property arising from Project No. 600. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The City shall levy a special assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel 10-40950- 010-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 2. The City shall levy an assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel no. 10.40950- 020-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 3. The Owner shall waive notice of hearing and hearing on the assessment of the Subject Property. 4. These special assessments shall be spread over a term of 10 years at an interest rate of 6.5% per annum. In the alternative, Owner may pay the special assessment within 30 days of the levy of the assessment per Minn. Stat. 5429.061. Datedj I - 16 , 1993 Dated: 11 • I is , 1993 Dated: , 1993 State of Minnesota ) )ss County of Dakota ) On this &L day of JoJ&m der , 1993, before me a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Thomas A. Egan and E.J. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. State of Minnesota ) NOT?YpUM JEMINN,ESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY Us cam County of Dakota ) som T -22.W On this QC) day of OCh?" , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Paul M. Abbott, to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. I /"\ t. BARBARA J. DALTON !,i NOTARY PU2LI3 - N`NNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY My ComMswon E*hm Sept 18.1990 Paul 4eAbbott M, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Fin Date a Department 11443 THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Attorney No. 4546 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 E. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-3781 RESOULTION OF THE CITY OF RAGAN ADOPTING STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, the City of Eagan proposed to assess land identified by the Property Identification No. 10-40950-010-00 for street improvements as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, the City of Eagan proposed to assess land identified by the Property Identification No. 10-40950-020-00 for street improvements as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600; and WHEREAS, Paul M. Abbott, the fee owner of the parcels 10-40950-010-00 and 10-40950-020-00 served the City a written objection to the proposed assessments on each of the identified parcels; and WHEREAS, Mr. Abbott and the City of Eagan have agreed to settle the assessment dispute according to the terms described in the attached Stipulation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, the Eagan City Council hereby adopts the attached Stipulation resolving this assessment dispute and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to executed the Stipulation on the City's behalf. ATTEST: 4B. J. VanOverbeke VULL City Clerk PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: City Attorney's Office DATE: November 11, 1993 RE: Assessment of KSTP Addition; Project No. 600 Our File No. 206-10997 Paul Abbott is the owner of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Opperman Drive (formerly Becker Road) and T.H. 149. The parcels take their access from Opperman Drive. The two parcels were proposed to be assessed as part of Public Improvement Project No. 600. Please see the attached maps showing the location of Lots 1 and 2, KSTP Addition. Project Project 600 involved widening T.H. 149 to add a 14-foot wide left turn lane and also to add two northbound lanes between Opperman Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. Prior to the Project, T.H. 149 had two 12-wide bituminous driving lanes with bituminous shoulders. The December 14, 1990, feasibility report indicates that the purpose of the Project was "to accommodate the immediate increased traffic from West Publishing and some of the longer term overall traffic growth." According to the report, the proposed main entrance from T.H. 149 to West Publishing's new facility was at the Opperman Drive intersection. Opperman Drive, which runs east and west in front of the KSTP parcels, was realigned to provide safer access to T.H. 149. Also, a traffic signal was placed at the intersection of Opperman Drive and T.H. 149. Assessment Process On November 17, 1992, Mr. Abbott filed a written objection with the City for the proposed assessments to the two KSTP parcels. The proposed assessments were as follows: 010-00 020-00 Widen Left Turn Lane $ 2,818.92 $ 3,276.18 Opperman Drive $15,225.02 $17,694.71 Traffic Light S 2.617.74 S 3.042.37 TOTAL $20,661.68 $24,013.26 In his objection, Mr. Abbott stated that he believed that the special assessment exceeded the benefit to the property and that the Project costs proposed were assessed inconsistently and inequitably among the various parcels. The Council certified the remainder of the assessment roll for Project 600 but did not certify the proposed assessments for the KSTP parcels. Appraisals In an effort to determine what might be an appropriate assessment, the City hired an appraiser to render an opinion as to the special benefit to the parcels of Project 600. The City's appraiser determined that the maximum benefit possible to the parcels combined was a total of $16,100.00. The appraisal was based on several sales of comparable parcels. The KSTP parcels are zoned light industrial. Most of the comparables were also zoned industrial. The City's appraiser believes that the Project improvements made the KSTP parcel 7% more valuable than the comparable parcels. The 7% figure is based on the appraiser's experience in the real estate field. The City's appraiser believes the area of the KSTP property will now have a greater identity with the traffic signal and vehicles will be able to take easier left turns from T.H. 149 onto Opperman Drive. The City's appraiser is of the opinion that the most likely use for the property is an owner/user type use such as small office/warehouse. The appraiser also believes the Project would have a greater benefit to the parcel if the parcel were zoned commercial and had a building that would benefit from being seen from the stop light. The property owner's appraiser believes that the parcels have received no benefit from this Project. The appraiser indicates that any benefit to the parcels is because of their proximity to West Publishing. Negotiations At trial, the City's appraiser's opinion of the maximum benefit to the two parcels together would be $16,100.00. Therefore, the highest amount that can be assessed for the parcels would be that sum of $16,100.00. In candid conversations with the City's appraiser, it is apparent that the appraiser believes the $16,100.00 is the most that could be obtained at a trial presuming the judge believes everything the City's appraiser says and totally adopts the appraiser's opinion that the parcels are valued at 7% more than the comparable sales. Upon receipt of the appraiser's opinion, the City offered the $16,000.00 figure as an assessment for the two parcels. The property owner responded with an $8,000.00 figure which, after having had discussions with the City's appraiser, seemed a somewhat attractive counteroffer. At the request of the City's Director of Public Works, however, this office countered with a $12,000.00 figure. The property owner returned with a $9,000.00. figure and finally came up to a $10,000.00 sum. As you may recall, in 1990, this office tried a special assessment appeal concerning similar facts. In that case, the City assessed the Hardee's on Pilot Knob and Duckwood for the Pilot Knob improvements and streetlight at the intersection of Pilot Knob and Duckwood. That parcel was commercially zoned and as a fast food location needed a high traffic volume. After trial, the court ordered the assessment reduced by 50%. Our attorneys have discussed this matter and have also had discussions with the appraiser in determining whether to recommend this proposed settlement to the Council. This office weighed the proposed settlement against the anticipated attorney fees and expert fees that would be incurred by the city regardless of the outcome at trial and also the landowner's expert fees which the City would have to pay if the court does not support the City's $16,100.00 assessment. Acknowledging the costs of going to trial on this matter and the possible cost of the landowner's expert fees, this office recommends that the City Council approve the enclosed special assessment agreement whereby the KSTP parcels would be assessed $5,000.00 each for a total of $10,000.00. If it is convenient, please place this matter on the agenda for the November 16, 1993, Council meeting. AMM/wkt cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk Eic?Hrs I E PARK PF I _ TAIMRAL 104 E_ wRd n n- xamAr Pr. 1- Pl`RES'I RIOEE 6-IRONNl00 Lx. . a- REbROCO Pr. i ; T- 9MIICE PT. Wo 49 T - xw x Irv NOP ES + _ V p + Ar ?xY 0 E k? Sil ? ? +2 +o ? J +o C NE NW , c i c o $ A SW SE sw Y AO TT f ® ? N -KOS? R OAR CARRIAGE ? z NIl15 GOLF d pAR _ -: NE ..__ STREET NW ?7 - L'O[/RSE I w F) i O ? SE ft 2IM a. )r ? p ' < u 11.L J z ? ;W ? '???` Ilu4M c ` , u 4 V ® $ ¢ NVERING N K Ci l? !On® SCOTT R0. IF3 L - 0o- +P c s ? CN. NOT TO SCALE x RICGE TN NE ?IW I \ p?RY. SS. - .\uflM}ER R/ LOCATION MAP 12-14-90 T. H. 149 FILE NO. 91104 IM= EAGAN, MINNESOTA DRG. NO. A ENGINEERS• ARCNITECTS• PLANNERS PROJ. NO. 600 1 ;"LCIAr ASSESSMENT AGRE MENT WHEREAS, Paul M. Abbott is the fee owner ("Owner") of record of certain prcperty bearing tax identification numbers 10-40950-010-00 and 10-10950-020-00 ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-010-00, legally described as Lot 1, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive and also Trunk Highway 149, both of which were upgraded as part of the City of Eagan ("City") Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, parcel 10-40950-020-00, legally described as Lot 2, KSTP Addition, abuts Opperman Drive which was upgraded as part of City Public Improvement Project No. 600; WHEREAS, on November 17, 1992, Owner served the City with an objection to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the City communicated with the Dakota County Auditor's office to delete these assessments from the tax statements of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the City and Owner have engaged in negotiations and have resolved all disputes relating to the proposed special assessment of the Subject Property arising from Project No. 600. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The City shall levy a special assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel 10-40950- 010-00 for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 2. The City shall levy an assessment in the sum of $5,000.00 on parcel no. 10-40950- 020-W for the upgrade of Opperman Drive. 3. The Owner shall waive notice of hearing and hearing on the assessment of the Subject Property. 4. These special assessments shall be spread over a term of 10 years at an interest rate of 6.5% per annum. In the alternative, Owner may pay the special assessment within 30 days of the levy of the assessment per Minn. Stat. 5429.061. Dated: 1993 CITY OF EAGAN, By: Thomas A. Egan Its Mayor Dated: , 1993 Dated:, 1993 State of Minnesota County of Dakota By: EJ. VanOverbeke Its City Cl?pk Paul Abbott H. )ss On this day of , 1993, before me a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Thomas A. Egan and EJ. VanOverbeke to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf cf said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public State of Minnesota ) )ss Co;:nty of Dakota ) On this .a1L day of O)7 , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Paul M. Abbott, to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. o Public ------------- --- BARBARA J. DALTON NOTARY PUBUp-MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY th Canmbebn E*4se Sept 18. Ipp6 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Finance Department Dated: THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Attorney No. 4546 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 E. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-3781 IS @ F? o FW 117 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA e Case Type: Special Assessment Appeal DISTRICT COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No: PAUL M. ABBOTT, Appellant, VS. CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, Respondent. d' 0?c- ??' Fs OBJECTION TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT In Re: Appeal from Levy of Special Assessment for Local Public Improvement Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Ch. 429, City of Eagan, Project No. #10P600 TO: MUNICIPAL CLERK, and/or MAYOR OF CITY OF EAGAN, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Minnesota PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Appellant, Paul M. Abbott, as fee owner of record of that property identified by property identification number 10-40950-010-00 objects to the amount of the proposed special assessment for Eagan project number #10P600 in the amount of $20,661.68. The grounds for the objection to the proposed special assessment are that the special assessment exceeds the special benefit to the property derived from the local public improvement and that the project costs proposed are assessed inconsistently and inequitably among the benefiting properties to the detriment of the Appellant. `7 5 4 l The purpose of this objection is to comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. §429.061, Subd. 2 thereof, as amended, and to preserve the rights of the Appellant to appeal to the District Court pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. §429.081, thereof, as amended. Dated this 17th day of November, 1992. BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Attorney No. 4546 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 E. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224-3781 Attorneys for ACKNOWLEDGMENT REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. §549.21, SUBD. 2 The undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, Subd. 2, costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing party or parties in this litigation if the Court should find that the undersigned acted in bad faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party, asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to harass or committed a fraud upon the Court. An F. BannioA Jr. l/ I DWIGHT W. DAHLEN, MAI, SREA DANIEL E. DWYER ' BEVERLY H. DWYER MICHAEL J. BETTENDORF, MAI MARC E. KNOCHE 1 DAHLEN & DWYER, INC. 1260 NORWEST CENTER TOWER • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 224-1381 KRISTINE L. AWADA WILLIAM E. PETERSEN JOHN B.KROPP JEFFREY R. LANGEVIN March 30, 1988 t Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public: Works City of Eagan ' 3830 Pilot Snob Road pagan, Minnesota 551.21 Dear Mr. Colbert: In accordance with your request, I have made an inspection and a preliminary appraisal of the property located at 3504 Dodd ' Road, Eagan, Minnesota. The purpose of this preliminary appraisal is to estimate ' the market value of the fee simple interest in the property and to determine the benefits, if any, accruing to the property as a result of City of Eagan Project #442. ' I have analyzed the value of the property before the instal.l.ation of utility and street improvements and the value of the property after the installation of utility and street ' improvements and feel. that the proposed special. assessments of $55,969.26 cannot be supported or substantiated in their entirety. ' It is felt. that assessments of approximately $25,000 can be substantiated for the property. It is possible that the remainder of the assessments could be deferred until that time ' when Lot 2 is sold and developed separately. At the present both Lot 1 and Lot 2 are being used as a t single site. Since this is a somewhat remote section of Eagan, land values have riot kept, pace: with other areas ir) Eagan having better convenience to amenities. West Publishing has a satellite office/warehouse facility on the westerly side of Highway 149 and the LIPS Company has a major facility on the east side of Highway 149 which abuts the subject property to the east. In May of 1985 UPS purchased approximately 86.36 acres for $1.,394,735 or $0.34/S.F. This equates to slightly over $15,000/acre. Since this time UPS has bought other parcels in the immediate area. Yorktown development owns a large parcel of land at the southeasterly corner of Highway 149 and Becker Road. This has recently been platted into small acreage sites and is ' being offered at $1.25/S.F. A 2.9 acre parcel, located immediately to the north of the subject property, is on the market for $1.50,000 or $1.19jS.F. There is an older house and two garages on the property which would more than likely be razed if and when the properly is sold for development. I 1 The subject property was originally a power plant which was constructed in 1925. There are several buildings on the site all of which are in below average condition and repair. It is felt: that it would be the contention of the present owner that 1 although the site is platted into two lots it is being used as a single parcel for his business and, in light of its usage and land values in the area, the proposed assessments would be excessive. 1 In the before situation the property is served by sanitary sewer along Highway 149 and bituminous roadway. In the after 1 situation the property is now served by an 8" diameter water main, storm sewer, and an upgraded County Road 63A or Becker Road. In the before situation County Road 63A or Becker Road had 1 an 18' wide gravel surface. In the after situation this road now has a 9-ton design and a 40' wide bituminous surface with concrete curb and gutter. 1 It is recommended that the City of Fagan try to negotiate benefits in the amount of $25,000 and propose that the remainder of the assessments be deferred until that time when Lot 2 is sold 1 and developed separately. It should be clearly understood that this letter constitutes only a statement of the final value estimate, and 1 Chat said value has been based upon a complete written appraisal. The written appraisal, although in rough form, has been prepared and retained in my files. Should you require a more formal 1 report, the same is available to you upon request. I hereby certify that I have no present or contemplated 1 future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this report and that I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this report or the parties involved and that the amount of the fee is not contingent upon reporting a 1 predetermined value or upon the amount of the value estimate. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in the written appraisal, upon which 1 the analysis, opinions and conclusions are based, are true and correct subject to the special and limiting conditions contained therein and that no one other than the undersigned prepared the 1 analyses, conclusions and opinions concerning real estate that are set forth in the written appraisal. 1 Yours very t uly, AHLfiN & DW R, INC.. Daniel E. Dwyer 1 DED/bjs DABILEN & DWYER, INC. FRONT VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY S ECO +.n:;r'c PARK I Q'q DIT1% "" 1$ .I ?'? r ?o S55 11 \ > A ? rai \ - ur... -- .r.i ert eot?1.5 oo i i i I n SCl r.u o. 9C V? i 'ono. )> O t^ ,?? v •>o.f 1 r«N YG Me. t> ?9 1 ` q \ T t \ yo . P -..>-- T 270 }n Y 1q y _:rt.u.. ?' i1 LL:a ..ra tri yd c R Q I L ?C 'J. w 10 YO k,). pANpl. CWNfY IIO.p NICK: I DANIEL E. DWYER DAHLEN & DWYER, INC. 1260 Norwest Center Tower St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 I EDUCATION: 1 I EXPERIENCE: Graduate of the College of St. Thomas 1967 Course 1-A, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 1971 Course 1-B, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 1973 American Appraisal Company Cost Estimating Seminar 1973 Course 11, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 1979 Course IV, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 1979 Eminent Domain - Advanced Legal Education 1980 ' Since 1971 actively involved in the appraisal of residential, commercial and industrial. real estate President, Dahlen & Dwyer, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation ' Instructor, appraisal seminars, Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area Qualified as expert witness on real estate values APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENTS: Equitable Relocation ' Romequity, Inc. Merrill Lynch Relocation Management Relocation Resources, Inc. Residential. Relocation Service Corp. Employee Transfer Corporation U. S. Steel Corporation ' Deluxe Check Printers United First Mortgage United Mortgage Corporation Northland Mortgage Corporation 1 First Bank St. Paul. First Bank Minnehalia ' First Bank Grand Western State Bank Commercial State Bank Norwest Batik ' City of Eagan City of St. Paul. City of Roseville City of White Bear Lake ' City of Vadnais Heights Ramsey County Parks & Open Space Department Numerous attorneys and private individuals ' e? -c CASH RECEIPT' ~. • CITY OF EAGAN • 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 DATE 11 I 19 RECEIVED FROM 1 AMOUNT $ & DOLLARS loo O CASH CHECK FUND OBJECT AMOUNT is I' 1 I Thank You BY White-Payers Copy Yellow-Posting Copy Pink-File Copy CASH RECEIPT • _4 CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 1? I EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 DATE FIECEWW i" FROM .{ J UNT $ & ao DOLLARS ? CASH ( CHECK Fan I C'._ ' I l BY N? 827t; While-Payers Copy Yellow-Posting Copy Pink-File Copy Thank You . BLDG. PERMIT r? 1 0 A< l O1-3210 Bldg. Permit 01-3422 Plan Check A1-3445 Surch./Adm. 01-3446 SAC/Adm. 01-2?5 Surcharge /*3860 Road Unit 20-2275 SAC 20-3865 Water Conn. 20-3868 Water Trmt. 20-3716 Water Meter 20-2252 Acct. Dep. 20-3713 Water Permit 20-3743 Sewer Permit 79-3866 Sewer Conn. ;0-3855 Park Ded. J TOTAL CITY OF EAGAN 3630 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21-199, Eagan, MN 55121 PH ON E: 454.8100 BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # To be used for "" ti• I ?` Est. Value ' . i.•Ut. Date A+`('• ? 119 ?.r; Site Address Lot Block Sec/Sub, Parcel a N.A,e YORKTON 1ND PK S z Address 1690 UNIVERSITY AVE 3 o City A!" Phone 484--9U(tU o Name PROVIDENCE KIL.DI15RS oa Address 1690 UNYVERSITY AV1Lr City S1 PAUL Phone 414--90M I— x uVrw Name Address U a w City' Phone I hereby acknowlgdge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesot.TStatutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Permittee A Building Permit is issued to: BCILIt IRS ' on the express condition that allwork shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official OFFICE USE ONLY Site Sewage n Q Occupancy 6-2/a--i y ? 1riiWCC System Zoning LI On Site Well (Actual) Const I I-N SPRIN City Water (Allowable) V-N SPRIII PRV Required # of Stories 1 + "4Ez Booster Pump Length 1bo l Depth 155' S.F. Total 37.037 Footprint S.F. 27.900 APPROVALS FEES Engr./Assess. Permit 19#6.00 Planner Surcharge 399.30 Council Plan Review 773.00 Bldg. Off. SAC, City 600.00 Variance SAC, MWCC Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit J ti 1 .00 Treatment Pt 12214.04 On Parks ' - TOTAL 1 + 7.50 f' BUILDING PERMIT Receipt # To be used for Est. Value Date Site Address 3456 ONW! 68 OFFICE USE ONLY Lot Block Sec/Sub. On Site Sewage Occupancy MWCC System Zoning cc Name W Address o City Phone Name ,o 0 i Address P City Phone IX mW Name F _ Address UZ W City Phone I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Permittee A Building Permit is issued to: _ on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. On Site Well City Water PRV Required Booster Pump APPROVALS Engr./Assess. _ Planner _ Council _ Bldg. Off. _ Variance (Actual) Const (Allowable) * of Stories Length Depth S.F. Total Footprint S.F. FEES Permit Surcharge Plan Review SAC, City SAC, MWCC Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit Treatment Pt TOTAL B--2 / 6-1 S4. Permit No. Permit Holder Date Telephone ik Plumbing HAA.C. Gi ?(? ya Electric Softener Inspection Date Insp. Comments Footings I y/,/ Y! 5'/ ?? %9 ?f Footings II Foundation Framing Roofing Rough Plbg. 7 ' / : • s d ? - a;f Rough Htg. Isul. Fireplace Final Htg. Final Plbg. Bldg. Final Cert. Occ. Temp. LP Deck Ftg. A, #&L. }??u coYa :.?, wsr ?Pe rt Deck Final IT uJr- A 1 r CONTRACT PRICE: Site Address MECHANICAL PERMIT RECEIPT # 266-2 Cs CITY OF EAGAN 8/ka?/88 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN, MN 55122 DATE PHONE: 454-8100 Name wL%v/LL UrATIAU a Address 1955 Shawnee Road City Eagan - Phone BLDG.TYPE Res. Mult x- Comm. Other FEES L Name PROVIDENC BUILDERS E 00 RES HVAC 0-100 MBTU -$24 c Address1690 Univ ersity Ave. . ADDITIONAL 50 M BTU - . 6.00 C) City St. Paul Phone 645 - (RES. HVAC INCLUDES A/C ON NEW CONSTRUCTION) GAS OUTLETS (MINIMUM - 1 PER PERMIT) - 50 EA 1 TYPE OF WORK COMM/IND FEE - 1% OF CONTRACT FEE . . Forced Air M BTU APT. BLDGS. - COMM. RATE APPLIES TOWNHOUSE 8 CONDOS - RES. RATE APPLIES Boiler M BTU MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL FEE - ALL ADD-ON & Unit Heater M BTU REMODELS - 12.00 Air Cond. M BTU MINIMUM COMMERCIAL FEE - 20.00 STATE SURCHARGE PER PERMIT - .50 Vent CFM $ (ADD $.50 S/C IF PERMIT PRICE GOES Gas Piping Outlets # BEYOND $1,000) Other FEE: '` ` . 50 S/C: SIGNgTCJFW BERMITTEE TOTAL FOR: CITY OF EAGAN I. CONTRACT PRICE: PERMIT # PLUMBING PERMIT RECEIPT # - CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN, MN 55122 DATE: ?J 1 d O PHONE: 454-8100 Site Address L = L -7 L I Lot 510ck ec/Sub m Name (,. m Address • r`' , o J k Toni -.. C City } c ;a L60.4 Phone"`'':;,j Name T C Address ^ I. p City - + Phone FEES COMM/IND FEE - 1% OF CONTRACT FEE APT. BLDGS - COMM RATE APPLIES TOWNHOUSE & CONDO - RES. RATE APPLIES MINIMUM - RESIDENTIAL FEE -$12.00 MINIMUM - COMM/IND FEE -$20-00 STATE SURCHARGE PER PERMIT - .50 (ADD $.50 S/C IF PERMIT PRICE GOES BEYOND $1,000.0o) SIGNATURE OF PERM TTEE FOR: CITY OF EAGAN ? BLDG. TYPE WORK DESCRIPTION Res. New Mult. Add-on Comm Repair Other RES. PLBG. ONLY - COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: NO. FIXTURES TOTAL Water Closet - $3.00 $ Bath Tubs - $3.00 Lavatory - $3.00 Shower - $3.00 Kitchen Sink - $3.00 Urinal/Bidet - $3.00 Laundry Tray - $3.00 Floor Drains - $1.50 Water Heater - $1.50 Whirlpool - $3.00 Gas Piping Outlets - $1.50 (MINIMUM - 1 PER PERMIT) Softener - $5.00 Well - $10.00 Private Disp. - $10.00 Rough Openings - $1.50 FEE: STATE S/C: GRAND TOTAL: SITE ADDRESS 3& 5Q /')odd 20OLd Unit # Permit # f T 91 I L / B Sect/Sub. ?Ur K4on .1nd --Pk 5 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR OTHER FRAMING ROUGH PLGG. ROUGH HTG. INSUL FIREPLACE FINAL HTS. FINAL PLIG. UNIT FINAL CERVOCC INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR COMMENTS 7- 676' r' z As , CITY OF EAGAN Permit No: Date: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Meter No: d 3 2 Size: ' /170 -If P.O. Box 21199 Reader No: Date: Eagan, MN 551e21 Owner. Site Address: .,dd Roaf, 11 " t"n;'r.t wn Tr, Conn. Chg: Acct Dep: Permit Fee: ' Surcharge: CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 71199 Eagan, MN 55121 Zoning: C:- rj, No. of Units: 0; " I agree to comply with the City of Eagan Permit No: Lt??715 Meter No: Date: 1 C t 9 Conn. Chg: Acct Dep: Permit Fee: Surcharge: Tr. Plant Meter. CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan. MN 55121 I agree to comply with the City of Eagan Ordinances. Permit No. Date: B/P No: ?7e4 Date: Acct. Dep: I agree to comply with the City of Eagan Permit Fee: - Ordinances. Surcharge: fiT" Misc.: By SEWER SERVICE PERMIT F WATER SERVICE PERMIT MWCC: )OrK: Zoning. CM, - City Chg: ` No. of Units: Ofc NO CO 1NTIL ACCESS PERMIT No _ CITY OF EAGAN 14819 & REVISED SITE PLAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21.199, Eagan, MN 55121 PHONE: 454-8100 BUILDING PERMIT z.IV Receipt# D] O To be used for COMMERCIAL Est. Value $799,000 Date APRIL 13 Site Address 3650 DQDD-ROIM- - Lot 1 Block 1 Sec/Sub. YORKTON' IND PK S 7ND ADDITION Parcel No. s Name YORKTON IND PK S W i Address 1690 UNIVERSITY AVE 0 City ST PAUL phone 484-9000 ¢ Name PROVIDENCE BUILDERS 0 ou Address 1690 UNIVERSITY AVE City ST PAUL Phone_ 484-9000 Name City I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of E n Or "nances. ?j Signature of Permittee A Building Permit is issued t . 'PROVIDENCE BUILDERS on the express condition that all work shall be done in accordance with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes a?ynyd, City of Eagan Ordinances. Building Official(?_ T19A.11' I l?l c_. OFFICE USE ONLY On Site Sewage Occupancy B-2/B-1 MWCC System X Zoning LI On Site Well _ (Actual)Const II-N SPRIN City Water X (Allowable) V-N SPRIN PRV Required # of Stories 1 + MEZ Booster Pump Length 1801 Depth 1551 S.F. Total ?a 0 7 Footprint S.F. ?7900 APPROVALS FEES Engr./Assess. Permit 1546.00 Planner Surcharge 399.50 Council Plan Review 773.00 i Bldg. Off. SAC, City 6.44_:OQ Variance SAC, MWCC 3300.102 Water Conn. Water Meter Road Unit 2221-00-. Treatment P1 1224.00 4714.00 Parks TOTAL 14847.50 i 16, a. --- i i artiKS Goat, . a a 4? 1,5 l zoaZl GLCLGC C 96L;,12 ? 9 d?L DATE q / 3 -o ce Craig: pL Would you please let us know if 1 r-t J Addition is ready for Sewer and Water Connection. OK Signed NOT OK Thanks, Diane & Sue I U? ?'iJ O ,tU er-7 Lisa-'3 6 (Il ,? F. Ct FOR CITY USE ONLY . PERMIT # ISSUED Pd w/Bldg. Permit FEES: $ $ $ $ /O, S $ - $ $ $ S $ S $ $_ ?C5 O d $_ /L/ 4- 0 -- 2? PY a z 7 RECEIPT RECEIPT SEWER PERMIT (INCLUDE SURCHARGE) WATER PERMIT (INCLUDE SURCHARGE) WATER METER/COPPERHORN/OUTSIDE READER WATER TAP (INCLUDE CORPORATION STOP) SEWER TAP ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - SEWER ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - WATER WAC SAC TRUNK WATER ASSESSMENT TRUNK SEWER ASSESSMENT LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT/TRUNK WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT SURCHARGE OTHER: U v TOTAL DOES UTILITY CONNECTION REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY? YES IF YES, THEN A "PERMIT FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC ROADWAY" MUST BE ISSUED BY THE ENGINEERING NO DIVISION. LIST AS A CONDITION. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: APPROVED BY': ?2e /s ,-V TITLE: n DATE: APPLICATION FOR PERMIT 1) PROPERTY ADDRESS: j [1 R-1 SINGLE FAMILY E] R-2 DUPLEX (Two Units) E:l R-3 TOWNHOUSE (Three + Units) ( Units) Q R-4 APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM ( Units) , LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot/Block/Subdivision or Tax Parcel ID IF EXISTING STRUCTURE, DATE OF ORIGINAL BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE: (month/Year) PRESENT ZONING/PROPOSED USE: COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/OFFICE Q INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL/GOVERNMENT 2) NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: 3)NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: n?"h771 sa • ?•. 4) WE NAME: ADDRESS: i NOM: PAW-EW OF FEE AT TIDE OF i APPLICATION DOES N(Yf CON- .*, STInM APPROVAL OF PE T. w ? INSPECTION OF SEwE2 AND/OR WATER :. t IUMW ATIONS WILL NOT BE SCMOI.ED r MnL PERMIT HAS BEEN APPROVED. ,'. rrrxf+xxxwfff+xr+xfwwwfx+rrfrrxfwffxxx Lumbers License: Active Expired Not recorded MASTER LICENSE St Inltia CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: 5) ® CONNECTION 6) le * THE GOLD COPY'OF THE PERMIT WILL BE SENT D Y TD PUBLIC WDRKS TO FACILITATE METER PICK-UP. * PLEASE ALLOW TWO WORKING DAYS FOR PROCESSING. SOMEONE FROM THE CITY WILL CONTACT YOU IF THERE t * ARE ANY PROBLEMS. rr SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION of cz agan SEWER ® CONNECTION TO CITY WATER O OTHER CASH RECEIPT 4 CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 p ,JDATE pECF= vrau lli?(V/LL ..?/ \ AMOUNT 8 DOLLARS Im ? CASH ? CHECK J I [?j 0 ott' ? ov' f 00 WM Paye,s Cagy Yelio?pwbng MFOe Copy Cow N° 88818 P Thank You BY MEMO TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS I J D kin TncP.k. JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPARTMENT S• BILL AKINS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH 4 SUE SHERIDAN, UTILITY BILLING CLERK") FROM, DOUG REID, BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT DATE: //102/8 The Protective Inspections Department will Ibenerforming a final inspection for occupancy of 3(060 60 ?O?j on 1001st Hcooo ?i 1dg. Please return within 48 hours with your approval or denial. Failure of response within that time frame will be determined as approval. It will be each departments responsibility to contact the construction firm with necessary requirements before final inspection and notifying the Building Inspections Department when all requirements have been taken care of. Thank-you. DR/js APPROVAL: DENIAL:% (SIGNATURE & DATE) (SIGNATURE & DATE) 1, MEMO TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ??1 Q ?J yDhk?on Z'ncf , k. . BILL AKINS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR r}? n CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH SUE SHERIDAN, UTILITY BILLING CLERK FROM: DOUG REID, BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT DATE: The Protective Inspections Department wilffl_Ibe-erforming a final inspection for occupancy of 3660 ,1)OC1 U (, OQ on 111101g R- HCAOC0 ?i ldg. Please return within 48 hours with your approval or denial. Failure of response within that time frame will be determined as approval. It will be each departments responsibility to contact the construction firm with necessary requirements before final inspection and notifying the Building Inspections Department when all requirements have been taken care of. Thank-you. DR/3s APPROVAL: DENIAL: (SIGNATURE & DATE) (SIGNATURE & DATE) V045'?? J:-6 MbNO T0: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tnof. ?k. BILL A&INS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR r? CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH dSUE SHERIDAN, UTILITY BILLING CLERK FROM: DOUG REID, BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT DATE: //1.2188, The Protective Inspections Department will be-performing a final inspection for occupancy of a'60 ,?)O on Please return within 48 hours with your approval or denial. Failure of response within that time frame will be determined as approval. It will be --each departments responsibility to contact the construction firm with necessary requirements before final inspection and notifying the Building Inspections Department when all requirements have been taken care of. Thank-you. DR/Ss APPROV L// J PI' DENIAL: V (SIGNATURE & DATE) (SIGNATURE & DATE) MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY * 4680 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90010 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the :MID-CENTURY INSURANCE CO.\IPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, does hereby appoint H.O. PORTLAND POCATELLO LARO PHOENIX VANCOUVER 6trri V1. Itofte6 Jerry Rett 1-1 ner ArStnin Cherie Geyer Russell Turner Rarbara ShorIj,,, 91-11 Pnrclinand WniS x1]111111" IIII Webb LInrIH .SUlas Vlrfae Mlchuel Steve Revd r,,ogc Nufanall R.J. b`a'rs A. Psrol Draf)cr Lae Ann Burgnss Lift Coughlin Duan ,Nelson Ixlnid 'I' Keating ..\lalll,n Redding Donald i Porbi, Mark Reid Gar, Leonan,I .Sharon Barker Anne I.annom 11011,n K. Waggener John BCnson SARO CSRO ' ' IWICn Finley' G.8- GOOdall, Jr. Ray Herstl gOr1TH 1 E%AS OPRO PLEASANTON Bernard I Ioir omb willlam Thom eOn 1 Kamlit Rant,' Karen Norman SIMI Lisa l n RObea D .1 g51011 . Ralph Geer shill", \1115011 Tom McLaurtan Ls. MaCLA c VICki Trill n!$aC1 facie o..athy' LU\IOntla K Rlehard l5 In Anna Berko Jane COOVe[ RC. Bachln en Jess [e La Cruz mejon Ka ,n Rarcelone Sherry People Geneva Jackwm Diane , Laura Rlin g MIRO c \larinn \\'altcrs Steve Glnmb Doris Nelson lsun Andy Finale fors waving COLUMBUS LavOnna Bales Rollers %I,-tian MERCED AURORA Dean Perrino Anna Moreau. NORTH TEXAS Tanl Wilkes Ruh Brooks wiaon Frank Knnller Mar, Kay Maubn vcona Giannone TCm Ilea" Kidd Ja nt linker Dec RO1,11f111 sands F ]bees Gent, Greer rlnnaltl Percival Sanutrlson in"adell Dennis m s ond Gavin A Flxrle Darr, Pickett Part Pall! Quinn i f L Df`ni51 C uns-Ut'lh Glenda Atkinson Hurham Mehurfi Mark FlNncisk0vic Sunrlra Saxton KIM Ednllston Carolyn Schwas its flue and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-facl, to make, execute, seal and deliver during the period beginning with the date of this power and ending December 31, 1988, unless sooner revoked, for and on its behalf as surety, and as its corporate act and deed on any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds fifty thousand dollars (sso.ooo-00). The execution of such bonds, recognizances or undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon said Mid-Century Insurance Company, as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in the Citv of Los Angeles, Countv of Los Angeles, State of California. Applicable to Utah only-That said Company is authorized to execute the same and has complied in all respects with the laws of Utah in reference to becoming sole surery upon bond, undertakings and obligations. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1988 IN TEsll.\IONY \Vj ii RPOF,'FI IE b11D-(.LNTURY L\SUR.A:NCL COPIPANY has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 7th day of January I9 Attested and Certified Rso tYtID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY w ?? e O By B r Cf(:rO11P?. ?_ SPCICIpr11 V]CC-I'/F..SIIICnr CERTIFICATION This Power ofAIlorncy is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Board of I )hectors of said MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPA,N? on October 3, 1980 at Los Angeles, California, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth: RESOLVED, That the President or any vice President or any Assistant Vice President. and the secretarv or any ASSISIant Secretary of file Company are hereby authorized, directed and eropowered for and on behalf of this corporation to make. execute and deliver the power of attorney of this corporation to empower any officer, employee or representative of this corporation, as they may at any tinge see fit. to execute for and on behalf of this corporation any bond or bonds, including but not limited to Fidelity and Surety bonds, including the acceptance of process, which this corporation may lawfully' issue through its duty constituted officers. and to revoke such powit r or powers of attorney from time to (fine as they in their sole and exclusive direction may see ft to do. On any instrument making or evidencing such appoinirnent. the signatures may be. affixed by facsimile. On any instrument confer- ring such authority or on any bond or undertaking for life company. the seal, or a facsimile thereof, may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that Illc seal shall not be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking, On any instrument certifying an appoinunent, the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof. 1, Maryann M. Seltzer, Secretary of Mid-Century Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing extracts of the Resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation, and of a Power-of-Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct. and that the Resolution and the Poweiof,vtorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of the corporation tiJPr 1N5UH,4HCF \NOpPtOq,1fF0 o this 7111 day of January O C.05 3 ?lN? o n AFC 3.15°9 a /h7'7? 1567744 7/87 131 IPP Jl040FORWI, secrelury CASH RECEIPT _ ¢¢¢/// CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 DATE 19 FPCY AMOUNT $ Q? & DOLLARS CASH IJ CHECK A-2? a_t - -o O--?- 1'e d az 4/ tolaIa r Thank You BY No 89050 Mdtl Payara Copy YNb.--p"lMg Copy Pink-FM Copy I 5 C'J IV Providence Bldrs.corp. 1690 University Avenue • St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 • (612) 484-9000 TO: C l T q bF 6 A "r.1 ATTENTION: L!aE th6P-GNP} IC_. PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED ?{ ? SHOP DRAWINGS IL`I. FINAL PLANS ? SPECIFICATIONS ? COPY OF LETTER DATE: - 13 - PIP PROJECT: H A NCa [31, D G. ? PRELIMINARY PLANS ? COPIES NO. DESCRIPTION I M-1 v c. I,A S 2 H V C, r.4gnAS FOR APPROVAL ? APPROVED AS SUBMITTED FOR YOUR USE ? APPROVED AS NOTED ? FOR REVIEW ? RETURNED FOR CORRECTI ONS ? RESUBMIT ? SUBMIT ? RETURN -COPIES FOR APPROVAL COPIES FOR APPROVAL COPIES FOR DISTRIB. REMARKS: 5 f3L E ELGc L ?lf jo 4ukvi 6 c S WILL oLL-LA-) S a L Signed: Jc F r- d3AKK.4 1690 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104, (612) 4849000 March 21, 1988 Mr. Ed Kirscht City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Yorkton Industrial Park South, Second Addition and Hanco Building Dear Ed: Providence Builders will not construct a driveway from the Hanco Building to Dodd Road (Highway 149) until an access permit has been issued by MN DOT. We realize that the city will not grant an occupancy permit until this access permit has been issued. Sincerely, Jeff Iisakka Providence Builders JI/di THE . es PVI UP- 4t 41 es "'j P0, .naasrxtar • Commercial • Investment • Development • Property, Management MEMO TO: JAY BERTHE - POLICE DEPT. CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH. TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPT. JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATION BILL AKINS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR JOE CONNOLLY, WATER DEPT. FROM: DOUG REID, DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS DATE: The preliminary construction plans for _ _ o !non c? a y c? ?;? ?n?_ So,?u7 are in our plan review section for your review and comments. Please return this form to Steve Hanson with your initialed comments and the date of review. Failure to return form to Steve within five (5) days will be considered your approval. If you have any objections to approval of these plans, it is your responsibility to notify this department and resolve any problems. ED Kivs?/?#.- En nees;n? - MEMO TO: JAY BERTHE - POLICE DEPT. CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH. TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPT. JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATION BILL AKINS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR JOE CONNOLLY, WATER DEPT. FROM: DOUG REID, DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS DATE: // SIBS The preliminary construction L/tl/UCt? 13GIc.A/Mfr plans for O/ock. vZ y?lE f??! X??, ?r Sort are in our plan review section for your review and comments. Please return this form to Steve Hanson with your initialed comments and the date of review. Failure to return form to Steve within five (5) days will be considered your approval. If you have any objections to approval of these plans, it is your responsibility to notify this department and resolve any problems. - z o - S Thank YOU. /JS ?P 1? • t V LUE I :t inLU_ L F7S1•lI,'1G C?:LING ,1r Fiim 0.51 Insu12t4cn, :cist Ceiling - 0.51 Air Film Total R 1 51 FLAT ROOF OR CA-MEDRAL CEILING Va ue R VALE FRAIMING CEILING v vv acv vv y is 0.51 inside air film 0.51 I I"-"µrL D&4e? Ceiling joist (stud f?eaasinsulation Icy U ?7a?•.?na0anr6Air space to S Roof decking Insula*_ion I 4-5 EPDI1h Built-up roof O.i7 Outside air film 0.17 Total R 21 •S = U o ¢(o r. 'NTndow infiltration .5 crm/lineal foot of crack Residential door infiltration 0.5 Cfm/square foot or door and minimum code requirement `icn-residential door irfiltraticn 11.0 cf-m/lineal foot of crack Llb 12" concrete block no insulation = .47 R 2.1 Ub 12" concrete block insulated cores = .25 R 3.3 ':yb 12° 'gn t;/elgnt btOC:C = '2 K 3.l b 2" iich .veignt blecik insulat_d Ceres = .12 .R 8.3 U s'ncle mass = i.li; stern ',41ndo'N ._= a double class = it - e m ass = =l :. c;cC2r''or'riaiis and C°_'.iincs -st have a v1nr barr°er (O.iD perm ?na2.j. ins'C° (."fazed "ide) 0f 'Mali ar_ar _ar-iers Cf ne =C t_:E:.^.E tone c9I r. film R it, n3Ve no •alCe. 1 ":ALL SECTION STUD SECTION 62NDWALL U VALUE CALCULATIONS R VALUE Inside air film .68 Interior wall insulation Sheathing Siding R TOTAL R TOTAL -2+,54- RIM JOIST R= .62 R TOTAL Outside air film .17 \ ) R TOTAL X3,22 U-}?LC Inside air film .68 Interior wall 41, stud R= 4.38 (:raring) U = R = Sheathing Siding outside air film 17 Inside air film R= .68 Interior wall . 15G Insulation (wall) U - 1 -s=,041 Sheathing aJ Exterior wall covering I P°? Exterior air filn R =.17 Interior air film R= .68 Insulation 1 1? inch soft wood R=1.88 (Rim U = R = Joist) Sheathing Exterior wall covering Exterior air film R= .17 Interior air fi1-n Insulation l- Foundation Exterior air film, R TOTAL Ixposed BLOCK J`=f aC? R= .?/ °R° IS total R U VALUE (Wall) U 3 = 01 (p i 3. 12. =raminc area - 131of --?,ss wall area. 13. Grass wail area I(,, C5 Window area U windows = ?? U x A im joist area A r) (03 2 Moor area A ro 12 ". Fireplace area A o °- - ax 3sed foundation .A I t.2 2 w&? L. 2 area A 2272 ft. Net wall area A ft, U rim joist =0_ U x A. = 5. 7 a 11 door area = 14?o U x .4 = 8°I.4- U fireplace = O U x A= U foundation = 0 U x A- '2Np uj tf U fimsm*ag area = 04'1 J x A= 35,0 U wall = o7 (? (138) TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . Ux1= q 59•S U x A = 17//•¢ 14. Gross wall area x 0.11 (A-1 single family & duplex = allowable U x A/Code (13. above) x 0.23 (.A-2 other residential) x .23 (Other buildings) x .23 (Over 3 stories) BTUH Must he larger than A l 6, 4-1 S x U Code_ 2'1; _ 7,77545 "F • 138 above 17 11.4 15. Ceiling framing area (Af) equals 1O" of ceiling area i6A. Gross ceiling area - (L) l9,CD x ('d) 1 5S -Z-7. goo ft.2 15d gist area (Af) = lCo ceiling area - O ft•2 15C. Net ceiling area (Ac) (i5A - 163) = 27 oC7 -. 2 J ceiling x A c= 04.4, x 27 902 = 1283,4- J framing x A f= 0 x -0 2 O 150. 707AL U x A ....................................... 12 S 3, 4 15. Ceiling area (15A) x 0.026 x M.033 x 0.06 15a 27{°I 00 (A-l single family & duplex - code allowable 'J x A (A-2 other residential) (other) QE? Must be larger than 150 (atcve; _ x .. 1rode)40(0- 1(-74- 1612) 560-8022 ':C7=: CSc U va.ues ?.,tainet res JIM KRAUTKREMER CONSULTANT 6425 SHINGLE CREEK 0R. BROOKLYN PARK. MN 55445 MINNESOTA STATE ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS 3ASED ON CHAPTER 7 OF THE MO tL ENERGY CODE - 1'3 EDITION Adontion Effective 1/1184 Owner Uh?.IC o IU bI1.?C? Phone +i5+-ArcX> DA+e iz/s?8 I Site address 30? popr ` cJ r;, Contractor ?eoJI 1G? t;,yILyeyS -Phone +e>4-1 Building Classification: Type Al (Single Family & Duplex) Type A2 (Residential) (3 stories or ess (Other) Goutinl?a? (Over 3 stories) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Building Perimeter Cn 70 ft. 2. Wall height (ground to eave) '24-,5 ft. 2 3 1. x 2. (above) gross wall arga.I ,,44'?77 ft. 4. Building dimensions (L) 10 x ('W) 1 55 = 27,„ Roo ft.2 roof & floor area 5. Square foot area of rim joist - Floor joist size (2 x ? ) 2 ? x Perimeter = Rim joist area = O ft 6. Doors - Area 1?r2 oq Thickness 2^ in. U factor 4 0 Type of Construction A4?fnL hS0L• Perimeter ft. Manufacturer ,?' "Air Infiltration Rates-Res. Doors: 7. Total door's perimeter ft CFM/sq. ft. of door area/Table Na. 5-1" S. 14indows: Manufacturer vw J?rstZ State approved U factor .55 "Air Infiltration Rate: CFM/ft. of operable sash crack/Table No. 5-3" TYPE SIZE AREA (Ft.2) NUMBER OF TOTAL FEET 2 (Match U Value) EACH UNITS 4 x y , c? 22 44 9?8 1. sax 5,g 8.7 8,7 -1 x S (p2 4 I l02. 4 9. -c'al f:.2 Window )050)11 lO. Fireplace area: Width x height = il. Exposed 'oundation: Heigh: x Perimeter_ IN OF -i_S RA is P ^ CEO OR LL E:, C`!t7 !ln ERGY, O7 ht4 -?kr ^F 111N'A1'- :.ODE = O ?x Z> r p x O CO'.ST^.UCTiCN. M1 'OR RE`tnC:1 TNG AND GUILCINGS RE.;!G ,;L_OWA iCE, is USED. SO E. -,let pos. 7, 3 7. Smoke alarms will be installed in the office area to your satisfaction to ensure quick egress by occupants. If there are any questions or concerns regarding the plans or review, please contact me. Sincerely, Jeff 7isakka Design and Drafting Yorkton Ltd., Inc. G Lowell Michels Executive Vice-President Hanco Corp. JI/jhw r 4,w York+ n ? DeveJopmemt 1690 UNIUSRS" Avy 5T. FAUL MN 55104 A"CTWI, 5EFF KEAAJs 2 ARckrh%-m, IN(., 16go VNIVCX-%,T'j AvC-, P,ALA?, M1,? 5310(4 Amp: kEN 1 Yorkton ltd,. "c 1690 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 • (612) 484.9000 March 3, 1988 Mr. Joe Merchak City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Hanco Building, 3650 Dodd Road Dear Mr. Merchak: The purpose of this letter is to address some of your concerns which were stated in the plan review comments. 1. Warehouse 124 will not be changed to any occupancy more hazardous than a B-2 occupancy without first notifying the city building officials and making appropriate revisions. 2. Receiving 121 will be used as a shipping/receiving area, vehicles will not park in this space. 3. Garages 122 and 123 are for the storage of personal vehicles. There will not be any repairs made or the use of any open flames. 4. The main isleway in warehouse 124, between the northern- most racking and the partition wall on Grid C, will be kept clear at all times of equipment, debris, or any other items that would block direct egress from office area to doors 124A and 124B (see sheet A10). 5. We were asked to increase the 5' land strip in front of the parking stalls to 7'. These areas are not being used as sidewalks, they are sodded. 6. The turn lane and bypass lane on Highway 149 will be constructed to the proper Mn Dot dimensions and specifi- cations. Industrial • Commercial • Investment • Development • Property Management - 5 I -. J I I. L i ? i 'fJxE. ?ciJbS -'??.._ ____ ___ 1 I a4 A' ho I voT wPFL-p 6G.- q? c1 r °-J?w M.N. GoMMOW Ck240r- O_ _ hoax b?e' I ? fLwe qw.y 1 iYP ?j o ,r ? _ I m- FI?NY?MIr VI ry` ewi sae,?+ (f ? 7 luo He... b 57 \ / 6? ?^ I r I I JI i I I r ?I TIP v R ?{ AI ?e i ? ? y :. Z°' I? o'.. 4v-a I II IoL 7 "P ? Ic 70.0 ? q; yl ?X ?'IL I`[? _55Pv q?:? 40l lv SO-o" LLL -# '-?L iii R? F ?l }+ F -_ 6 IX MT LVT'( &rJV?u.1 ?i v N lu ._I`7 LT j 2 ? ? II ,?i,I OFFIGS j zo^ i? ^? i I z `i. F I d Q? 113n SF yp - I _ 120' p? 1- I G?-Y I WI I I I U ci J.? o?y _.. TYP ?i I K? ? I 91 '^{ ? RI In ARcibUSE 4REA •.. 5ef. G AI y /---I F ? r ? ? a-I N; _ [433v 5q.pr F.o. see ®.? I yt° I ?' ? 10'0' 19 I ' 'aJSTRJLTFa V -1-=?-y J'1 a - 2'?o"wiot. loo ? i ?'6GS I L..-_.8`1' 'to' x.U•mHC urmN _ I I Ge:NT4 O N 5 O 5 LIES { i T ?- Lc O c JSO O ?N F i 1 -4 TRSwsFavi?,e.1: ?.D 3S5! o" No?7ri ? - ' SITE • x: -- ram>.; A Z H 0 F I y U l c ca C \T z . JS [? Y x c h PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: RANCO BUILDING PLAN REVIEWED BY: JOSEPH D. MERCHAK The comments listed below refer to documents that make up the Minnesota State Building Code and the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Eagan. Certain code deficiencies may not have been included in this report, but this shall not be construed as an approval of such code deficiencies: 1. Mezzanine may be enclosed if a second exit is to a protected stairway, etc. -- UBC 1716.4 Ex.2 2. Foyers, lobbies and reception rooms shall not be construed as intervening rooms if constructed as corridors -- UBC 3303 (e) 3. Exit signs at required exits -- UBC 3314 (a) 4. Two exits required from warehouse; from office -- UBC 3303 (a) 5. Arrangement of exits -- UBC 3303 (c) 6. Rooms 4!122, 123, 117 and mezzanine office level: Required exits through store rooms prohibited -- UBC 3303 (e) 7. Room 117: Exit through more than one intervening room prohibited -- UBC 3303 (e) 8. Occupancy separation between office area and Room 124 required (or provide substantiating documentation and agreement to maintain Room 124 occupancy consistent with B-2 office use) -- UBC 503 9. Room 121: Vertical and horizontal occupancy separation required -- UBC 503 10. Horizontal occupancy separation required between Rooms 122, 123 and mezzanine above -- UBC 503 11. Handicap parking stall signs -- MSBC 1340.1900 12. Office partitions: Comply with UBC 1705 (b) 13. Revise site plan per requirements of Eagan's Engineering Department (see attached site plan with comments). Attachment TYPE of c wenT Quc rood COLA clad r!? ), T-AP-JtC- `-''APE- 5-1 P1 Ij(nJ .1? S jji) I ' S PA, i M K LOZZEn booo /bADD ?' 3 a n?• See S o S?c? }? A N c o u L -Dl N G r, 8 r, YO R VMS 2N,7a 5FR,,A - P,A ?er. - 5&4rH 2ovz) ADIN Le GAI , L I, Z YORI-TON I NbVSTRIAL_ PARK SOULTH 2ND ADEN, QCCUPANC_Y; U-2/13-r E-,UMDlNG Slag; (ACTUAL AREA) Fool PRINT' MEVe,AK04E; ) s5'x19o' _ .2r? 50o* -? ;zQ9oo U Sill 15ld = SSIOU 61 x I r2 = 10 9137 To"CA- SQ%.kARE ?=OcsTA&6 'S'RF4,.17awN Ac4-o? ?sA k:jo SSE; GARAGE NPF A,?xzAS', OFFICE; MA1N FLOOR', GFFIce ; Ml;-ZSANING `, Szx95= vsx n9 _ 3553 1.3'Y 13' = 169 5,D2-4 ys x r)9 = 3- 72"19 WAkc-HoLk5c AaEAs', 3rio3'1 LoT SIDE /0ZLI1?1 Y35?o= 2,35 Ames LoT Couo;LA?c,£ ?? l)goo lozl-W = .270 3 rl 0 37 ZSHO 727q VALuA-T 10 N ' 9 cl 9 000 =, 21) 900 S,F, = 2 3, PER Foo i P,¢ //v7' q9cl ooo ; 3r7o3'1 SP = Z1,5 / /Nctuoov6-MEN«UAIJWE ZVPC- O ?Qk?`?? ?m?tca { (AC-1-"AL) IL-N, saPINKLOQ? HANCO BLDG. (WHSE) .495/2000 --- ROUTE NO. 4 DESCRIPTION --- Q-ADD D1A T PIPE PT REFERE NCE LOSS/FT E FITTS PE D-TOTAL. C--I'=ACT LT TOTAL PF OUTLET 16 55.04 1.682 34.57 K= 11.10 -.297 0.00 LEG ------ 19 ----- -108.28 ------- 120 --- 10.9 -3.24 OUTLET 17 - 51.29 ------ 1.682 ---- -------- ------- 31.33 K= 11.10 -.091 0.00 LEG 20 -56.99 .120 10.9 --.99 OUTLET 18 50.09 --1.682 ---_ _._____.---- ---70.34 E'= 11.10 -.002 0.00 LEG 21 --6.91 120 10.9 -.02 OUTLET 19 50.06 1.682 - 30.32 K= 11.10 .054 0.00 LEG 22 43.15 120 10.9 .59 OUTLET 20 50.78 - 1.602 - _ 30.91 1= 11.10 .228 0.00 LEG ------ 23 ----- 93.93 ------ 120 ---- 89.3 20.39 REF 304 -- 0.00 ---- - 2.157 ---- -------- -------- 51.30 .0613 0.00 LEG ------ 24 ----- 93.93 ---- 120 -- 23.0 1.56 REF 904 ---- - ------ ---- -------- 6 ------- OUTLET PE PO NOTES ------------ --9.98 24.59 ------------ -9.92 21.35 ------------ -9.98 20.36 ------------- -9.98 20.34 -9.92 20„93 4 HANCO BLDG. (WHSE) .495/2000 ---• ROUTE NO. 3 DESCRIPT ION •--- Q-ADD DIA T PIPE PT OUTLET REFERENCE LO SS/FT E FITTS P=: PE Q-TOTAL. C•-FACT LT ---- TOTAL - PF PO NOTES OUTLET 11 54.59 1.68 ---. _. _- 34 _...^17 - ------------------ 11.10 K= -.289 0.00 -9.98 LEG 13 -106.74 120 ---_------ - 10.9 --3.15 24.19 OUTLET 12 50.91 -- -- 1.682 ---------- - --------- 31.02 -------------- -- K== 11.10 -.087 0.00 -9.98 LEG 14 -55.62 120 10.9 -.95 21.04 OUTLET 13 49.75 1.662 30.07 - K= 11.10 -.001 0.00 -9.95 LEG 15 -6.08 120 10.9 -.02 21).09 OUTLET 14 49.73 1.682 30.05, K= 11.10 .055 0.00 --9.98 LEG 16 43.65 120 ------_._.----- 10.9 ..60 20.07 OUTLET 15 50.47 -- 1.682 .---- -- --- - - ------ - 30.66 --------------- K= 11.10 .229 0.00 -9.98 LEG 17 94.12 120 89.3 20.46 20.67 REF 303 0.00 _---------- 2.157 ----_•_._- •-°--•_ _.-_-- 51.12 .068 0.00 LEG 18 94.12 -_- _- 120 ------- 23.0 1.57 REF 903 ----•---- ---_----- - ---- -- 52.69 ----.___.________ HANCO BLDG. (WHSE) .495/2000 --- ROUTE NO. 2 DESCRIPTION •--- G°-ADD DIA T FIFE PT REFERE NCE LOSS/FT E FITTS FE ------ ----- U-TOTAL -------- C-FACT --------- LT --- TOTAL -- - -- PF -------- OUTLET 6 54.39 1.682 - - -- 33.98- K= 11.10 -.285 0.00 LEG ------ 7 ---- -105.97 - 120 10.9 -3.11 - OUTLET - 7 - ------ 50.73 --------- 1.682 ---- -------- ------- 30.07 )= 11.10 -.085 0.00 LEG 8 [. -4'.,.,.25 12o 10.9 -.9=: OUTLET 8 49.58 1.682 29.94 K= 11.10 -.001 0.00 LEG ------ 9 ----- -5.66 -------- 120 ---- -- - 10.9 - - -.01 -------- OUTLET 9 49.57 -- - 1.682 - - ----- - - 29.9' K= 11.10 .056 0.00 LEG 10 43.90 120 10.9 .61 OUTLET 10 50.32 1.682 30.53 K= 11.10 .229 0.00 LEG -.--.--- 11 --'--- 94.22 ------- 120 89.3 20.50 --.-- REF 302 - 0.00 --------- 2.157 --- --------- ---- 51.03 .0613 0.00 LEG 12 94.22 120 23.0 1.57 REF 902 T ;2.61 OUTLET FE PO -9.98 24 . 00 --9.98 20.89 -9.98 19.95 -9.98 19.94 --9.98 20.55 NOTES REF 91.15 57.10 4.260 53.16 .04' 0.00 LEG 90 43.3.66 1201 9.2 .38 -------------- REF 906 56.38 4.260 53.54 .053 0.00 LEG 91 490.05 1201 9.2 .48 - REF 907 56.1.6 4.260 -----'54.02 .064 0.001 LEG 92 546.20 120 9.2 .59 --------------------------------------------------------------- REF 908 56.17 4.260 54„61 .077 0.00 LEG 93 602.38 120 9.2 .70 --------------------- ---------------------------------------- REF 909 56.52 4.26() 55.32 .091. 0.00 LEG 94 658.90 120 9.2 M-1: REF 910 57.39 4.2611 --56.15 .106 0.00 LEG 95 716.29 120 9.' .97 REF 911 58.78 4.2611 ^57.12 . 123 0. 0C) LEG 96 775.07 120 17.0 2.08 --------------------------------------------------------------- REF 912 346.41 5.295 59.20 .08A 0.00 LEG 103 1121.48 120 42.5 -'.58 -------_•-°_--------- - - REF 913 0.00 6.065 62.78 L_04 0.00 LEG 104___ WOOL- OL- 1121„48 1'x'0 4g„0 1.87 ------------ ----- - --- -- --- ?- SNC?uoES 100 G,P.H, xb1Z REF 914 0.00 6.2'76 -" 64.65 D.z•T. _ iN51oe Mos *u? sPKe. .028 1 ..r _ Rc4' KT. A-T k3hSr: OF RISC LEG 105 1121.48 140 177.0 4.90 - REF 915 400.00 8.110 '_.____._-69.55 .014 0.00 LEG 106 1521.48 140 218.0 04 ------------ S=P, hL -__----_----'"'"---- i Tom. 60 0IT l-?TOrkr DeKMJD AT Ck" MA1N "WATER 5.1" Mist. by Faire Sprinkler Consultants (913)281-1264 Licensee - ARROW SPRINKLER, INC. - Minneapolis, Minnesota HANCO BLDG. (WHSE) .495/2000 --- R OUTE NO. 1 DESCRIPTION -- Q-ADD DIA T PIPE PT OUTLET REFERENCE LOSS/FT E FITTS PE PE Q-TOTAL C-FACT LT TOTAL PF FU NOTES OUTLET 1 54.28 1.682 33.90 K= 11.10 -.203 0.00 --9.98 LEG 1 -105.63 120 10.9 -3.09 23.92 OUTLET 2 50.65 _ ----- .1.682 --------- ------------- 30.80 ------------- K= 11.10 -.085 0.00 -9.98 LEG 2 -54.98 120 10.9 -.92 20.82 OUTLET - 49.51 1.68:2 - - -- `29.88 --- - - _-?- K= 11.10 .001 0.00 -9.98 LEG 3 -5.47 120 10.9 -.01 19.90 OUTLET 4 49.50 1.682 --- ----...-- ---- 29.87 - --- Km 11.10 .056 0.00 --9.98 LEG 4 ----------- 44.03 -------- 120 ---- ---- 10.9 ----- .61 - - 19.69 ------------ OUTLET 5 50.25 -- 1.682 ---- --- -------- 10.48 - K= 11.10 .230 0.00 -°9.98 LEG 5 94.29 120 89.3 20.53 2015o REF 301 0.00 _ 2.157 _ - 51.01___ _ .069 0.00 LEG 6 ----------- 94.29 -------- 120 - - 23.0 1.58 ---- REF 901 0.00 - ------- 4.260 --------- - - ------------- 52.5B -- - .002 0.00 LEG 86 94.29 120 9.2 . (:)'2 REF 902 94.22 4.260 - 52.61 . 0019 0. 00 LEG 87 188.51 120 9.2 .08 FIEF 903 94.12 4.260 _ 52.69 .019 0.00 LEG 88 282.63 120 9.2 .17 REF 904 93.93 4060 52.06 .032 0.00 LEG B9 376.57 120 9.2 .30 --° LEG TADLE - FRICTION FRICTION VELOCITY LEG NO. DIAMETER LENGTH FLOW GPM C LOSS/FOOT LOSS/TOTAL. FEET/SECOND 97 4.260 23.13 --346.41 120 -.0276 -.639 7.8 98 4.260 2.00 -285.05 120 -.0193 .039 6.4 99 4.260 7.16 --163.47 120 -.0069 -.049 1.7 100 4.260 10.00 -122.42 120 -.0040 -.040 2.2 101 4.260 16.00 -81.53 120 --.0019 -.019 1.8 102 4.260 10.00 -40.74 120 -.0005 -.045 .9 10'F 5.293 42.50 1121.48 120 .0843 3.561 16.3 104 6.065 43.00 1121.46 120 .0435 1.869 12.5 105 6.276 177.00 1121.48 140 .0277 4.900 11.6 106 8. 1 10 21B.00 1521.48 140 .0140 3.044 9.5 -- LEG TABLE -- FRICTION FRICTION VELOCITY LEG NO. DIAMETER LENGTH FLOW GPM C LOSS/FOOL" LOSS/TOTAL FEET/SECOND 48 2.635 101.00 75.95 120 .0173 .173 4.5 49 2.635 47.30 121.55 120 .0413 1.955 7.2 50 2.635 10.00 90.86 120 .0241 .241 5.3 51 2.635 10.00 60.55 120 .0114 .114 3.6 52 2.635 10.001 30.36 120 .0012 .032 1.13 53 1.682 134.00 57.10 120 .0908 12.172 8.2 54 1.682 134.00 56.38 120 .0887 11.892 8.1 55 1.682 134.00 56.16 120 .0881 11.804 8.1 56 i . a% 134.00 56.17 120 .0881 11.910 8.1 57 1.682 134.00 56.52 120 .0891 11.946 8.2 58 1.682 134.00 57.09 120 .0917 12.290 8.3 59 1 . 682 134..00 58.78 120 .0959 12.844 8.5 60 1 . 682 134.00 61.36 120 .1038 13.905 6.9 61 1.442 176.00 30.72 120 .0611. 10.759 6.0 62 1.442 176.00 30.31 120 .0396 10.496 6.0 6 1.442 176.00 30.19 120 .0592 10.418 5.9 64 1.442 176.00 30.36 120 .0598 10.529 6.0 65 1.442 145.00 41.05 120 1045 15.467 8.1 66 1.442 148.00 40.89 120 10 38 15.356 B.0 67 1.442 148.00 40.79 120 .1033 15.290 8.0 68 1 . 442 148.00 40.74 120 .1031 15.252 B.0 69 4.260 9.16 159.91 120 .0066 .061 3.6 70 4.260 9.16 320.26 120 .0239 .219 7.2 71 4.260 9.16 481.59 120 .0508 .466 10.8 72 4.260 9.16 644.91 120 .0373 .799 14.5 73 4.260 9.16 587.82 120 .0735 .673 1.3.2 74 4.260 9.16 531.43 120 .0610 .559 12.0 75 4.260 4.00 475.27 120 .0496 .198 10.7 76 4.260 5.16 575.27 120 .0706 .365 12.9 77 4.260 9.16 519.10 120 .0584 .535 11.7 78 4.260 9.16 462.58 120 .01472 .432 10. 4 79 4.260 9.16 405.19 120 0369 .338 9.1 8Ci 4.260 9.16 346.41 120 .0276 .253 7.8 81 4.260 4.00 285.05 120 .0193 .077 6.4 82 4.260 5.16 163.47 120 .0069 .036 3.7 83 4.260 10.00 122.42 120 .0040 .040 2.8 84 4.260 10.00 81.53 120 .0019 .019 1.8 85 4.260 10.00 40.74 120 .0005 .005 .9 86 4.260 9.16 94.29 120 .0025 .023 2.1 87 4.260 9.16 138.51 120 .01090 .082 4.2 88 4.260 9.16 282.63 120 .0190 .174 6.4 89 4.260 9.16 376.57 120 .0=:<23 .295 8.5 90 4.260 9.16 433.66 120 .01419 .384 9.8 91 4.260 9.16 490.05 120 .0525 .481 11.0 92 4.260 9.16 546.20 120 .0642 588 12.3 93 4.260 9.16 602.38 120 .0769 i705 13.61 94 4.260 9.16 658.90 120 .0908 .832 14.8 95 4.260 9.16 716.29 120 .1060 .971 16.1 96 4.260 17.00 775.07 120 .1226 2.085 17.4 HANCO BLDG. (WHSE=) .495/2000 --- LEG" TABLE --- FRIC"T"ION FRICTION VELOCITY LEG NO. DIAMETER LENGTH FLOW GE'M C LOSS/FOOT LOSS/TOTAL FEET/SECOND 1 1.682 10.91 -105.63 120 -.28351 ..093 15.2 2 1.682 11).91 -54.98 120 -.0847 -.924 7.9 3 1.682 10.91 --5.47 120 -.0012 -.013 .8 4 7..682 10.91 44.03 120 .0562 .613 6.4 5 1.682 89.:'5 94.29 12o .2298 20.528 -3. .6 6 2.157 23.10 94.29 120 .0685 1.576 8.3 7 1.682 10.91 -105.97 120 .2852 -3.111 15.3 8 1.682 10.91. -55.25 120 -.0855 -.932 8.0 9 1.6B2 10.91 -5.66 120 -.0013 -.014 .8 10 1.6B2 10.91 43.9o 120 .0559 .609 6. S 11 1.682 89.35 94.22 121 .2295 20.502 13.6 12 2.157 23.00 94.22 120 .0684 1.574 8.3 13 1.682 10.91 -106.74 120 .2890 -3.153 15.4 14 1.682 10.91 -55.82 120 -.0871 -.951 B.1 15 1.682 10.91 -6.08 120 -.0014 -.016 .9 16 1.682 10.91 43.65 120 .0553 .603 6.3 17 1.682 89.35 94.7.2 120 .2290 20.46' 13.6 18 2.157 23.00 94.12 120 .0683 1.570 8.3 19 1.682 10.91 -108.28 120 -.2968 -3.238 15.6 20 1.682 10.91 -56.99 120 -.0905 -.988 8.2 21 1.6B2 10.91 -6.91 120 -.001B -.020 i.o 22 1.682 10.91 43.15 120 .0541 .590 6.2 23 1.682 89.35 93.93 120 .2282 20.3B6 13.6 24 2.157 23.00 93.93 120 .06B0/ 1.565 8.2 25 2.157 23.00 57.10 120 .0271 .623 5. l,1 26 2.157 23.00 56.38 120 .0265 .609 5.0 27 2.157 23.00 56.16 120 .0263 .604 4.9 28 2.157 23.00 56.17 120 .0263 .604 4.9 i9 . 2.:FJ °7 23.00 ? ?6.J?.. ~ 1:: .I7 .?I266 .611 5.0 330 2.157 23.00 57.39 1 20 .0273 .629 5.0 31 2.157 .3.00 58.78 1:.20 .0266 .657 5.2 32 2.157 3.00 61.36 120 .0309 .712 5.4 33 2.157 23.00 -159.91 120 -.1B20 -4.187 14.0 34 2.157 23.00 -160.35 120 -.1830 -4.208 14.1 35 2.157 23.00 -161.33 120 -.1850 -4.256 14.2 36 2.157 23.00 --163.32 1201 -.1893 -4.353 14.3 37 2.157 23.00 57.10 120 .0271 .623 5.0 38 2.157 23.00 56.38 201 1 ..0265 5 J .6019 5.0 39 2.157 23.00 56.16 120 .0263 .604 4.9 40 2.157 23.00 56.17 120 .0263 .604 4.9 41 2.157 23.00 56.52 120 . 0 266 .611 i 5.0 42 2.157 23.00 57.39 120 .0273 .629 5.0 43 2.157 23.00 58.7B 120 .0286 .657 5.2 44 2.157 23.00 61.26 120 .0309 .712 5.4 45 2.635 59.60 121.58 120 .0413 2.463 7.2 46 2.635 10.00 15.45 120 .0009 .009 .9 47 2.635 10.00 45.76 120 .006B .066 2.7 HANCO BLDG. (WHBE) .495/2000 ---- OUTLET TABLE OUTLET # K-FACTOR PRESSURE FLOW ELEV. (LBB.) 1 11.100 23.915 54.28 9.98 2 11. 1 C)0 20. 822 50.65 9.98 3 11.100 19.898 49.51 9.98 4 11 . 100 19.B85 49.50 9.98 r RAK 14?tiP C?'4) 5 11.100 20.498 50.25 9.98 6 11.100 23.997 54.38 9.98 7 11.100 20.886 50.7.'0 9.98 8 11.100 19.954 49.58 9.98 9 11.100 .. 19.940 49.57 9.98 10 11.100 20.549 50.32 9.98 it 11.100 24.190 54.59 9.98 12 11.100 21.037 50.91 9.98 13 11.100 20.087 49.75 9.98 14 11.100 20.071 49.73 9.98 15 11.100 20.674 50.47 9.96 16 11.100 24.586 55.04 9.98 17 11.100 21.348 51.29 9.98 18 11.100 20.360 50.09 9.98 19 11.100 20.340 50.06 9.98 20 11.100 20.930 50.78 9.98 \. ?xy7O (JOtISrz?(I°,±' ?`w 111?? ?v.11 )) ?.¢'1 (dj tl3S? ?kl 7 ny X13 & o 'Y dh7 ?`? . *7 klo I n n ?iz ? i .- i 1 z ? .. 1 m /L 0 ? 4 L ! vj s IY IYL I L I IvL -,. . d3c ?I 19 w to x ze .Yy>-,..? r i5 ra,r JL6 ' t rd"4 o x ftii7 2 ) If e ? (? d z s p 37 it S3 a '} q ?a3) ?15 t) Llo?_.IfS d ?0 v .I Be n +li y 13Q >op X16 M lb d ?a t id) V P "t. s o: T, :x39 ast ?,L7 4 Ox) (If t) aov*Y tf V ^' Yj (?, x9B i16L __ Al@ f -, 4 o41 .?. 3) al CI)N pN 9 ra4 a S 4 ' Mot b58 43a ?'- x ' L b43 # e"? Y! I d. ? uOP#q L ? . i r 1?_' 'I t¢ t21/t JtW ?ae?aly tY??} l'7zP (116) v ?' =C r o ?i° (ni) 14 1 Caw r I] V ?'' ? 61 L) y LF UO P"EI4 ?; A 9 \, Iy 176) 51Lg 1'4 ?e°P 616 0 y L ,} b (t N'n) LBOPx17 aid. 11/+ Z ? b xM7 ?I±B) Loop dl9 o o r n VnE 1.ILIA IOAW- IOU 41 FR IIEAD % .496 DEN51rl = -41.5 6..A N- RE@'D We HEAD OVaRitACKS IN WNSi CZ0517I,e5,dALC). 2. E1tY Or 3FKt5= Z3-ti 3. USE 11141611 GI1ALL906Z" .1 ,ILsd 5F'kR5. WItH K= 161 IN WKSE, 4. 1451= "X-C' AM 5Ct1.41o PIPE FOR LINES kw)MkINS W1114 rz Ih.a S, U5E 0-1" FM UN DERGRODND . t 9 D t uI ?1J 8) ? t01. ._ -r-n'q >a 4qm?> "es'F mAlm ARROW SPRINKLER, Inc. 1521 93rd Lane N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55431 (612)780-2800 list Jill fill Jill Jill ;III it I I LI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 110 105 00 85 90 as 8 P• S 1 AT T B •S •'1= 80 75 70 - - 65 60 55 50 z CY7kL 'AW V-1Er- 'keC S 6.P Ar 8 (N, s, p 7 40 81U l D c,. AId YN is 1k1 auT 10 21.Y8 41?M• r6µ, sAsr, A?t- 3 25 20 D K 15 10 1 1 H I 5 v, n w 7 W CL CL p 100 200 3DD 400 500 200 400 600 600 1000 300 600 900 1200 1500 400 800 1200 1600 2000 600 700 1200 1400, 1800 2100 2400 2600 FLOW - (G. P. M.) 1600 1800 2400 2700 3200 3600 -?T 2000 SCALE B 3000 SCALE C 4000 SCALE D MEMO TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPARTMENT BILL AKINS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR CRAIG KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECH SUE SHERIDAN, UTILITY BILLING CLERK FROM: DOUG REID, BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT DATE: ?7'nd. -Pk. S.' co o' ojd,?' The Protective Inspections Department will b erforming a final inspection for occupancy of 3(0 SD bod d k 0Q on //o/s?- ?jGoeo ?i ldg. Please return within 48 hours with your approval or denial. Failure of response within that time frame will be determined as approval. It will be each departments responsibility to contact the construction firm with necessary requirements before final inspection and notifying the Building Inspections Department when all requirements have been taken care of. Thank-you. DR/Ss APPROVAL: DENIAL: (SIGNATURE & DATE) (SIGNATURE & DATE) RVDROSTATIC ALL NEW IINDEROIIOUND PIPINGJIYO0.05TATICALLY TES TED AT q TEST ........._._ p( C!-L? PSI FOR K HOURS ..... TOTAL AMOUNT OP LEAKAGE MEASURED LEAKAGE GALS. HOURS - TEST AIC LOWABLE LEAKAGE ' GALS. NOSES . NUMBER INSTALLED TYPE AHD MAKE HYDRANTS ALL OPERATE SATISPACTORILY Yu (] NO CONTROL W NO IP NOR CO STATE NT RBASONVES LEFT WIDE OPEN: ru VALVES ?/ HOE THREADS OF FIRE T OS N TIP RO DEP ARTMENT ANSWERING ALARM? YKF L7 NO INTERCHANGEABLE WITH H I E OF DATB L 'I IN SEgVICH - EP REMARKS ? ? CO Al A? $; . I PARTS A S, B NA OF SP INKLa ER CO TRACTOR ? ?T N TILE POp Q ERTY R 1 [y? - )Lx ' - -i FOR SPR?N L R CONTRA 0. 1 I DATB SIGNATURES I ... ?tSTS WITNESSED By DATE ^ PART "C" - SPRINKLER ! WATER SPRAY ABOVEGROuNfi PIPING (FILL OUT SEPA GTE PART "C" FOR EACH RISER) ' sHNVEB BLOCS., -- LOCATION -- TESTS NG-. -'x /r . E : DRY PIPING DRAW: ....... .... . REQUIRED IPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION: ALL ___ TEMPERATURE MAKE MODEL SIZE. QUANTITY RATING SPRINKLERS r 6 e -. OR Lvl/CI.U ------ '?--- OVA - ' f SPRAY JLL? i7 K/w. NOZZLES ---- r? k1l` -- -$--__.. 2.' - " - PIPE A ND MATERIAL ANO KIND CONFORMS TO Vfp 4 -I- STANDARD ?-? FITTINGS _ _ IF NONE. EXPLAIN 33 ej _ _ ALARM D E V 1 C E MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE THROUGH TEST PIPE ALARM VALVE OR FLOW INDICATOR .---4 TYPE MAKF. - MOUEL MIN SEC. ?LoW AM?"y)_Q7?-G1Ll? ..-.?P -U_ -. ERATING TEST RESULTS: i, 'T'IME TO TRIP ( TRIP TIME DRY MAKE MODEL SEA. PIPE WATER AIR I POINT THROUGH TEST WATER ALARM NO. _ _ WITHOUT WITH- ppP55. PRESS- AIR RHACIT TEST OPERATED PROPERLY PIPE q. O. O. PRESS. Q. O. D. OUTLET YIN. SEC. _ MIN. P_.S.I. PS.1. am P.S.t. MIN. SEC. YPS NO VALVES IP NO. E WN OPERATION: YNLUNAx1C D Kuu:"Ic a HYMAULIC Cl PIPING SUPERVISED: Yes 0 NO 0 DETECTING MEDIA SUPERVISED: Yu D NO 0 DELUGE DOES VALVE OPERATE FROM THE MANUAL TRIP AND/OR REMOTE CONTROL STATIONSI Yu D NO 0 k IS THERE AN ACCESSIBLE FACILITY IN EACH CIRCUIT FOR TESTING? YM 0 NO 0 IP NO. EXPLAIN PREACTION VALVES _ DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE MAXIMUM TIME TO R MAKE MODEL SUPERVISION L088 ALARM? VALVE pELBASet ELEA58? OPBRATB YES NO YES NO MIN. SEC. ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT uz_n O PSI FOR HOURS DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED: Yu 0 No 0 TESTS EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY: YCF p/ NO 0 IF NO, STATE REASON ' DRAIN TEST: READING OF GAGE LOCATED NEA WATER SUPPLY TEST PIPE: RESIDUAL PRESSURE WITH VALVE IN TEST P PR OPEN WIDE PSI PSI STATIC PRESSURE BLANK - NUMBER USED LOCATIONS NUMBER REMOVED TESTING WELDED OR BRAZED PIPING Yu D NO Z&O IF YEN, M1 YOU CERTIFY AR THE RPRINKLRR CONTRACTOR THAT THE. WEI.PISHS OR BRAZERS ARE QQUALIFIED FOR WRLD• GASKETS ISO OR BRAZING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RggUIREY KNITS OF ASIAN H(11 L.?:R AND PRESSURE VESSRI. CODE, SECTION IS, UAI.IFICATION STANDARD FOR WELDING AND BRAEINO PROCEDURES, WRLUEHU. BRAEERB, AND WELDING AND BRAZING P1'ERATDRI:-IRLL EDITION. xu 0 NO 0 EN DATE LEFT IN SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL VALVES OF REMARKS OAS -7 "S i- R-M S NO T I N S g?.I.t c- 4 101 TITLE NAME OF SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR R H OWNHR ( PART "C" 12 oye"L.) Sj-ZW/C4z!-lZ SIGNATURES EFOR S SPRINKLES CO SIONBD TESTS WITNESSED BY J TITTLE DATE - 7 CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL & TEST CERTIFICATE PART "A" GENERAL PROCEDURE UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. INSPECTION AND TESTS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR'S REPOWANTATIVE AND WITNESSED BY AN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALL DEFECTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AND SYSTEM LEFT IN SERVICE BEFORE CONTRACTOR'S MEN FINALLY LEAVE THE 100. A CERTIFICATE SHALL BE PILLED OUT AND SIGNED BY BOTH REPRESENTATIVES. COPIES SMALL BE PREPARED FOR APPROVING AIITHORrf1ES. OWNERS AND CONTRAC- TOR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE '5 SIGNATURE IN NO WAY PREJUDICES ANY CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR MR FAULTY MATERIAL POOR WORKMANSHIP. OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH APPROVING AUTHORITY'S REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL ORDINANCE& rave.... Hann DATE i? '--? 9- 7 - PRO ERT ADDRESS - ACCEPTED BY APPROVING A ORITYI'SI NAMES `S o COMN\% &-CL L /C.rs/< --r-otr-B,$ Zn,c AODRESS PLANS en $`O / 4u q LA,L $' 600 lJN ff)4'?dLl3 FYLN SOU -ZS? INSTALLATION ONPORM5 TO ACCEPTED PLANS, Yc4 NO O ERUIPMENT USED 15 APPROVED rce Q/ NO IF NO. STATE DEWATIONS NAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EpU1PMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AB TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CAPE OP 'THIS NEW EQUIPMENT? Ttl Q"`- me E3 IP NO. EXPLAIN INSTRUG TIONS HAS A COPY OP INSTpUCT10N AND MAINTENANCE CHART BEEN LEFT AT PLANT? Ytl Mtn 1110 13 IF NO. EXPLAIN ' RLI'FHI\G: VI". 111r rrVUIhVI rate 11.111 water IX clears. Inditated by no collection of foreign INIRW In burlap bM at outlets "" M - 1' rent- a blow-Ots. Flush ul flow- '-of lens Ihnn 750 GPU for A-I.ch 1.114 shit smiler, 1000 CPU roe S-Inch pipe, 1600 OPM tM' 10-10th pipe, and two OPLI for IB- I,,-h PIP.. N'hrn xumd}' eanm.t s due. Mlpalaled flow ales, obtain rnselltlum av.I111ste. TEST HYDROSTATIC; HydrvreMtlc lnwt. Mall Ix made :rt not It" than NO PSI fur two huun ar SOPEL thew nUUle Prepun In neon of IN PEh Dllferenti.I dry-plies 1.1,e clapper. sbell Iw left open ducting teal to prevent donee.. All xhoeegtotlad pIplT Hakaga shop 10 aloppsd. DESCRIP- LEANAI;F. Row pkre hold with rubber g.takeledpinh nha ll, If the worknnrnMiF is Astlxfactl"T. have little or no leakage at the joints. The am•,mn of leakage At the J.lnt. shell nut exceed E euarl. per hour Fee 100'QnInt. irrespecUvaly of pipe diameter. The leakage shall M dts- trlbaled urrr All jninta. If .ugh leakage « . at A few joint. the Itiv all tlon ahail he considered u usitliftwWr, And necewauT vepa" ' TTGN nmdr. Ruw pipe W d with caulked lend ur Iced-subxlltute blot. Xhnll. If the III.... hip le AtlefactaT, have little w too lenkoge at the phua. Any Joint having Ix:knge or more thin n 'Might drlif" ear "weeping" Xhall he repowed. Leakage ahall and a heed I x (liHnld nW:n- ure) per hour Pre Inch of pipe dlnmewr' per Flat- 'Cho I.AleAne n AU fro dimitsoted over MI Joints. It aurh leakage c l. ILIIIMl eu- HrelY at A few jinni, the I.sbdlnllon shall Ile eo".1dered 41L':rMXfXI'lur)' ahd necessary Mini made. _ PROCHATIC. Establish 10 FBI air pressure and measure drop which shall not exceed IN PSI In gs hour.. Test WtwM tsRRS at riprM&l water lu.el slid Air pressure and measure air preaettre deal, which shall act .nod IN "I in M hours PART "&" - UNDERGROUND PIPING R? &J06e000L:r t 9AT*AA4 FEEDS BLDGS. LOCATION 1.•M-i2t- PIPE TYPES AND CLASS TYPE JOINT UNDER- GROUND CONFORMS TO STANDARD Ytl NO O IP NO. EXPLAIN PIPES AND IOIMS NEEDING ANCHORAGE CLAMPED. STRAPPED. OR BACKED IN YN No ? ACCORDANCB WITH JOINTS STANDARD IF NO. EXPLAIN TESTS REQUIRED FLUSHING HYDROSTATIC - LEAKAGE NEW UNDERGROUND PIPING FLUSHED ACCORDING TO / STANDARD Tin BY (COMPANY) f A A rU.0A IOW FLUSHING FLOW WAS TA INFDDt _ PUBLIC WATIA TANK OR RERRYOIR O' "a PUMP 0 THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING, FLUSHING - ?r xYE sun. ? OPEN nn L FLUSHED ACCORDING TO TANWRD Yin 13 _jj,plp? A- TESTS rlrS IMM NY ?COMPANY) - ????Rr e6/FI?AJ"/71UG1 HOW FLUSHING FLOW WAS D AINtlD: runt WATER TANK BE atltlvpR (] Plan PUMP Q THROUGH N'xAT TYPE OPWING: Y BONN. TO TI.ANQ a MM ? ? OnN pin Fora Ne. M . . Poland in U.B.A. Dote 3/15/2006 6°MT OF WAV PARCEL LAYOM7 ? Bonestroo 0 Rose Anderl ik & Associates S.P. 1916-25 COUNTY DAKOTA OWNER WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY PARCEL NO. EAG-30 ADDRESS 610 OPPERMAN DR. PO BOX 64526, EAGAN, AN 55123 Scale 1" = 50 ft. N ?. pF ON. S. LOT 1 i BLOCK 1 YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH 2ND ADDITION v ' ' ' " y ? E 15.00 40 06 s L1 N63 \ A v L2 N63'34'1 2"E 4.00' s ? rn.,+. L3 563'34'45"W 19.00' ' ' " 45 E 16.00 L4 N63'34 L5 563'34'12"W 10.00' 0 L6 S63'40'06"W 10.00' 9,t Q ,: ?'o pF o N ? I o? o ? y VA POINT OF BEGINNING ` TEMPORARY EASEMENT LEGEND POINT OF BEGINNING - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PATH EASEMENT TRAIL/DRAINAGE/UTIL.ESMT (CITY) POINT OF COMMENCEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT V KI\59\4904129\6aa\OGa\FOe319wwow\Poraels.POraeIs_eas+.a°n Sheet 2 of 2 .s Date 311512006 URNT OF WAV PARCEL LOOK Bonestr00 Rosen Anderlik & S.P. 1916-25 COUNTY DAKOTA Associates OWNER WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY PARCEL NO. EAG-30 ADDRESS 610 OPPERMAN DR., PO BOX 64526. EAGAN, MN 55123 SCCIa 1" = 50 fit. An Easement for Trail, Drainage and Utility purposes, over and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Yorkton Industrial Park South 2ND Addition, a plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. Said Easement being described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest Comer of said Lot 1, thence along the South Line of said Lot 1, North 63 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet; thence North 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 75.17 feet; thence North 63 degrees 34 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of 4.00 feet; thence North 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 179.78 feet to the North Line of said Lot 1; thence along said North Line, South 63 degrees 34 minutes 45 seconds West, a distance of 19.00 feet to the Northwest Comer of said Lot 1, being also in the Northeasterly Right of Way Line of State Trunk Highway No. 149; thence along said Right of Way Line, South 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 254.92 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 4,543 sq. ft. or 0.1042 acres of land. A Temporary Easement for Construction purposes, over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Yorkton Industrial Park South 2ND Addition, a plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. Said Easement being described as follows; Commencing at the Southwest Comer of said Lot 1, thence along the South Line of said Lot 1, North 63 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of said Easement herein described; thence North 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 75.17 feet; thence North 63 degrees 34 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of 4.00 feet; thence North 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 179.78 feet to the North Line of said Lot 1; thence along said North Line, North 63 degrees 34 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 16.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 49.92 feet; thence South 63 degrees 34 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 205.04 feet to said South Line of Lot 1; thence along said South Line, South 63 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds West, a distance of 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2,329 sq. ft. or 0.0534 acres of land. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: PFTFR M WAGENAAR SIGNATURE: DATE 3//5/2006 LIC. NO Di 1.CI l V, L Affik, 977"v? City atEa?au Pat Geagan MAYOR Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Mike Maguire Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Thomas Hedges CITY ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.6535 TDD www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. December 7, 2006 Mr. Thomas J. Walrath Senior Director / Facility Management Thomson Legal & Regulatory 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Re: T.H. 149 Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 778 Parcel 30 Easement- Setback Conformance 3650 Dodd Road (PIN 10-88101-010-01) Dear Tom: I am writing regarding 3650 Dodd Road and the dedication of the permanent easement for trail, drainage and utility purposes by Thomson to the City of Eagan as a part of the reconstruction of Highway 149. The intent of this letter is to clarify that the easement will not impact the conformance of the parcel. The attached documents include the legal description and exhibit for the easements on 3650 Dodd Road (Project 778 reference - Parcel 30). While the exhibit indicates encroachment onto the existing parking lot by the temporary easement for construction purposes, since construction may impact the edge of the parking lot closest to Highway 149, the permanent easement for trail, drainage and utility purposes does not encroach upon the parking lot. The permanent easement is a maximum of 19' wide, adjacent to and beyond the right-of-way, and fits within the 20' required setback for the parking lot. As I had mentioned in earlier correspondence, since the permanent easement is just that, an easement, and not public right-of-way, the existing parking and building setback limits will not be impacted by this easement dedication by Thomson. The setback limits that currently exist at 3650 Dodd Road will remain as they are after the grant of the easement and construction. Please contact me with any questions. I will place a copy of this letter and attachments in the parcel file at City Hall for future reference. Sincerely, ?I,, Russ Matthys, P.E. City Engineer Enclosure: Easement Legal Description & Exhibit c: Thomas Colbert, Public Works Director Robert Bauer, Asst. City Attorney Jon Durand, Thomson G'.R O5/ ttc roj 778, P=d 30 Esmt,-Walma January 5, 1988 Mr. Steve Hanson Assistant Building Inspector Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Theis: This letter is to inform you that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has made a SAC determination for the Hanco Bldg. to be located within the City of Eagan. It has been determined that 6 SAC units should be assigned to this building. This determination was made as follows: QA0 TTni4-. Office Space 6256 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. per SAC unit 2.61 Warehouse Area 20925 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. per SAC unit 2.99 Total 5.59 or 6 If you have any questions, please call. incerely, Donald S. Bluhm Staff Engineer DSB:blur CC: S. Selby, MWCC Walter K. Johnson, MWCC Jeff Iisakka, Providence Bldrs. 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423 1?1l L bPIN G Yg sLyi T. F€g ST 5ODM c 5r7q Ag i x '5,2,5-= 9 7Z lSq S-rNir- `MI2 HAk? 99`l 000 A. oooy 3 99 PLA,Q REVD, Is4h X so/, _ X773, SA?-- t-? &Dd - 6 xroo MET90 sac- 3 >C> G?SSb= ? + ?`?5?- Z ,35 ?gcre63 ?? r? ZZ 9 1, PAQr Fee- 7 ?oZyB? x • ova = I PEAMTneNr Nl- (oXZoy = 1988 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION - CITY OF EAGAN SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS H A N c o B U IL D NG INCLUDE 2 SETS OF PLANS, 3 CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY, 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS a NOTE: ADDRESSES FOR CORNER LOTS - CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER MUST DESIGNATE WHICH ADDRESS IS DESIRED. NO CHANGES WILL BE ALLOWED ONCE BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. MULTIPLE DWELLINGS RENTAL UNITS FOR SALE UNITS # OF UNITS INCLUDE 2 SETS OF PLANS, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - CHECK WITH BLDG. DEPT., 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS Y COMMERCIAL INCLUDE 2 SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS, 1 SET OF SPECIFICATIONS AND 1 SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMWACIAL To Be 4sej For: T__5Uj 1DjA4G Valuation: '799,000 Date: Site Address DcUD RpAD Lot Block Y0AKT&#J 10PWTA1A(- Parcel/Sub PARK SaUrA YoRKTPO wp*s-urm Pg tic Owner 5ou - A MN. 6¢N6KAI- PAR?N61L51P Address 14090 UNIJORVITY AVE. City/Zip Code ST, PAOL} N11V. 55104 Phone 424- 9200 (ZEFF) Contractor PR&JIDENC.E bUltoer-5 Address 1&90 UW?J&RSITf AVe. City/Zip Code ST. PAUL. ? M4. 55104 Phone 484 - 9 Dao Arch./Engr. K,1.1. Kr;RI.IS A550C. Address 1(090 UNIVER51-fY AVE. uFflot WE UNLI On site sewage- Occupancy _ID7- MWCC system ? Zoning L-1 On site well Actual Const :ff--J City water ? Allowable V-] PRV required _ # of stories 1-r Booster Pump Length /£ Depth I! S.F. Total 3?'1 Footprint S.F. R9 APPROVALS FEES Engr/Assess Permit 5` Planner Surcharge -3 9 9 Council Plan Review 77 00 Bldg. Off. ?4 19 SAC, City Goo2- Variance SAC, MWCC 3300°-° Water Conn _ Water Meter Road Unit 229r,e° Treatment Pl 1224,x° Parks Copies TOTAL 14 F3U?.5C City/Zip Code N klt-'M Phone # 4 2 4 - 9 2M NOV' 18.2002 3:28PM DERWALD ROOFING li/f/ 1 johns ManWileI N0. 2920 P. 2 19' Retro-Fit® Board Description W Ratro-Fd Board is a high density board made of expanded perlite and cellulosic fibers. The top surface is sealed with TopLoe coating to ensure good attachment in bituminous applications. W Retro-Fit Board meets the physical requirements of ASTM C 728. use W Retro-Ft Board is a perite-based utility board for use as a divorcing layer in reroofing, and in new construction as a top layer in multi-layer insulation systems. it serves as an upgrade for wood fiber utility roofing products. It may be applied with hot asphalt or mechanical fasteners. It is not recommended for use directly over steel decks. W Retro-Fit Board has been rated in numerous Factory Mutual fire and wind-resistant systems and is also approved for use in specific Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. Class A constructions. Advantages • Excellent strength and handleability • Good dimensional stability • Expanded perlite compoeition • Stable 'R"-value • Minimum recycled content of 35% by weigh typical physical Properties Values Teat Method Scree W Ratro-Ft Board is available in 2' x 4' (0.51 1.22 m 4'x4'(1.22mxl.22m)or4'x8'(1.22mx2.44m cards. Water Absorption, % by Volume - 2 his ................... ....... 3.5 max...................... ... ASTM C 209 Compression Resistance 5% Consolidation-pai..... ....... 35 (241 kPal ............. ...ASTM C 185 10% Consolidation-psi..... ..... .50 (345 kPa) Laminar Tensile Strength-psi ....4.9 0.8 kPal ............. ..ASTM C 209 Flexural Strength-psi ............ .......60 (414 kPaI ............. ...ASTM C 203 Product Density ef ............. .......11.14 (178.224 kg(m' )..ASTM C 209 Linear Expansion ................... .......0.5% max................... ... ASTM C 208/ ASTM 01037 Thermal Performance Thiaknms(nernJ C-Value(Conductance) R-ValueIRselatenee) in mm BTUghrAP••F) WAWOC (hrdP••FyBTU m'••C1W A 13 0.78 4.3 1.32 0.23 Refer to the Material Safety Data Sheet and Product Label prior to using this product. For an identical copy of this data sheet ask for RS-5047. N04" 18.2002 3:29PM BERWALD ROOFING SO johns Manville E'NRG'Y 2 meets the physical property requirements of ASTM C 1289 and Federal Specification HH-1.1972/0en and HH-1.197212. E'NRG Y 2 specialty products are also available as tapered panels, pre-cut miters and pre-cut crickets. Description E'NRG'Y 2 is a rigid roof insulation board composed of a closed cell polyisocyanurats foam core bonded in the foaming process to uni- versal fiber glass reinforced facers. Use E'NRG'Y 2 provides high thermal insulation value over metal, nail- able, and non-noilable roof decks in built-up, modified bitumen and single ply membrane roofing systems. It may be applied using hot bitumen, cold adhesives or mechanical fasteners. The universal facer on the top and bottom side provide a suitable surface for mechanical attachment to a structural deck as well as a suitable surface to apply hot asphalt or cold adhesives. E'NRG'Y 2 has been rated in Factory Mutual to-60 and to-90 fire and wind- resistant systems for BUR, modified bitumen and single ply systems in specific constructions. It has been classified by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. as an approved roof insulation in many Clsaa A roof constructions and Roof/Ceiling hourly tire-rated assemblies, and is classified by Underwriters Laboratories Canada. 0. 2920 P. 3 E'NRG'Y Zm JM also supports NRCA Bulletin !9 in recommending that a cover board of Fesce Board, Fiber Glass Roof Insulation or %' Retry-Fd Board be installed over foam insulations in hot membrane systems. Advantages • High thermal efficiency • Universal facer that is compatible with BUR, modified bitumen and single ply membrane systems • Complies with EPA requirements a Meets Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Typical Physical Properties Values Test Method Water Absorption, % by .......... .....1.0 max...................... ... ASTM C 209 Volume - 2 hrs. Dimensional Stability Change : 7 days 4158•F (700C), 90.10096 RH Lengthwise ............................ .... <2%............................. ... ASTM D 2125 Crosswise .............................. .... <2% Compression Resistance' 10% Consolidation-psi IkPa)..20 (138) nom .............. ..ASTM D 1621 Moisture Vapor Transmission" .................... ....<1 perm......................... ASTM E 95 (57.5 ng/(Pa•s-m ) Flame Spread. ........................ ....25 max........................ ... ASTM E 84 Service Temperature .............. ...: 100 to 200•F 1.730 to 936CI -Alm av.ilible in 25 an 1172 ORL "Foam cars arty. Far Use Over Maul Docks The minimum thicknesses of E'NRG'Y 2 insulation over metal decks are as follows: W d1h of Up to 296e Up to 3%U Up to 4%W Rib Opening (67 mm( (1M mm) (111 mm) Thickness 1.0'(25 mm) 1.2(30 mmI 1.3' (33 mm) of Insulation (Minimum) sizes E'NRG'Y 2 is available in 4'x 4' 0.22 m x 1.22 m) or 4'x 8'(1,22 on x 2.44 m) boards (other sizes available by special request) and in thicknesses of Mr 125 mm) to40 (102 mm). Thermal Performance Thickness Imam.) C-Volue (Cenductenee) 9-Value (ResUunae) in arm BTUAkrfi -6111 WABI10C (hrfP-'FVM mR-•Clw 1.0 25 .167 .95 6.0 1.05 1.2 30 .14 .79 7.1 1.26 1.3 33 .12 Be 8.3 1.47 T.4 36 .1 t .82 9.1 1.60 1.5 38 .10 .57 10.0 1.76 1.6 41 .09 .51 11.1 1.86 1.6 46 .08 .45 12.5 2.20 2.0 51 .07 .40 14.3 2.52 2.3 58 .06 94 16.7 2.94 15 fit .054 31 18.6 327 2.7 09 .05 .26 3.52 3.0 76 .046 .26 22.0 3.63 3.2 81 .043 24 23.4 4.10 3.4 es .04 .23 25.0 4.40 3.8 97 M6 10 26.o 4.89 4.0 102 .033 .19 30.0 5.34 The tharmal values of E'NRGY 2 ware determined in accordance with PIMA Technical Bulletin t01 and ASTM C 1289. Racom irneNgations he" indicated that reduction in team thermal performance will continue to occur after the PIMA sax-march conditioning period. The ultimate R-value at these products will dopand on individual Installation circumstances. eahaa ealadol the amkipaW thermal Performance aver the axpaesd mod news products, JM sulocas the we at u Rats of 59 per inch of low *kknm ID. of - •cift 3-69 Refer to the Material Safety Data Sheet and Product Label prior to using this product. For an identical copy of this data sheet ask for RS-5039. 6517771371 NOV.18.2002 3:28PM BERWAID ROOFING (051 - Cot I - 4(,q4- NO. 2920 P. 1 ?~YTN r CRa?G- avAc2. ?C / ? DATE. 11/15/02 LIST F MATERIALS PROJECT., Hanco Building Reroof SUBMITTED Br Berwald Roofing Co., Inc. 3650 Dodd Road 2440 North Charles Street Eagan, MN 55123 North St. Paul MN 55109 VAPOR RETARDER Of Req&reo REPLACEMENT INSULATION (If Required) 114U4A710N P" tyPo d Wck?ou for each roofarea) 2.7" ISO Johns Manville 1/2" Retrofit top layer Johns Manville TAPERED INSULA7I0N Cricket ISO or Fiber Board Johns Manville MEMBRANE 4-Ply Type IV Fiberglass Johns Manville BITUMENIADHESNES Type III Asphalt Trumbull MEMBRANE RLASHING Dynalastic 180 Johns Manville 20-MIL PLASTIC FLASHING Nervastral SHEET METAL Prefinished UnaClad Kopper Sales LUMBER Douglas Fir Untreated Shaw Stewart AGGREGATE 07 Shiely ROOF DRAINS (If Required) FASTENERS Insulation to existing metal deck Johns Manville PLASTIC CEMEM MISCELIANEOUS Accepted Not Accepted By Date r Berwald Roofing Company, Inc. ROOFING AND SHEET METAL 2440 North Charles Street North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109-3080 (651) 777-7411 • FAX (651) 777-1371 October 11, 2002 SUBMITTED TO: ATTENTION: PHONE. West Group 610 Opperman Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Chuck Lipinski 687-6592 PROPOSAL FAX: 687-6829 Faxed Mailed JOB NAME: Building 181'x 156' Re-roof JOB LOCATION: Eagan, MN WE PROPOSE TO FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND INSURANCE TO COMPLETE SHEET METAL AND ROOFING - AREA: 28,000 SQ. FT- 0 Tear off and remove existing ballasted EPDM roofing and insulation. • 3.3" Poly Iso fire rated insulation mechanically fastened. • 1/2' Rigid insulation mopped in place with hot asphalt. • 4-Ply fiberglass felt (Type I'l) asphalt and gravel roof. • Modified bitumen base flashing, 4" wood cant and 20-mil plastic at perimeter. • Prefinished flashing and (10) scuppers. fk- MaiL1?s %;:, We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, for the stun of: One hundred fifty-seven thousand two hundred seventv-eieht dollars ($157,278.00). Terms of payment: Net 30 days. Al material is guaranteed to be specified All work to be conhpleted in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any aheration or deviation tom above specifications involving extra costs will be exaW od udv upon written orders. and will become an e#ta charge over and above the estimate. Al agreements are contingent upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner is to carry foe, tomado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workman's compensation Insurance. /1 Authorized Signature: Ron oempken MOTE: This proposal is valid for 30 days. It may be withdrawn or modified if not accepted during this time. Acceptance of Proposal - The above prices, specifications and conditions are antisfaaery and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as speolied. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature: Signature: JAS42601C Page 1 of 1 EOE Industrial a Commercial • Residential Since 1936 OFFICE USE ONLY SUBTYPE ? 01 Foundation ? 26 Public Facility ? 30 Accessory Bldg. ? 14 Apartments X 27 Commercial/hidustrial ? 32 Ext Alt - Apts. ? 15 Lodging ? 28 Greenhouse ? 34 Ext Alt - Comm. ? 25 Miscellaneous ? 29 Antennae ? 35 Ext Alt - PF ? 37 Nail Salon WORK TYPE $Ultz UP x0OF- C-00- apf F'I"T> ? 31 New ? 35 Tenant Impr ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 46 Windows/Doors ? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Bldg >( 43 Reroof ? 47 Repair ? 33 Alterations ? 37 Demolish (Bldg) ? 44 Siding ? 48 Authorization ? 34 Replacement ? 38 Demolish (Int) ? 45 Fire Repair GENERAL INFORMATION Census Code SAC Code No. of Units I No. of Bldgs. Const. (Actual) - (Allowable) UBC Occupancy Zoning # of Stories Length Width Basement sq. ft. First Floor sq. ft. sq. ft. MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTIONS ? Gas Service Test ? Heating APPROVALS Planning Permit Fee ? Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC City SAC Water Supply & Storage S/W Permit S/W Surcharge Treatment Plant Park Dedication Trails Dedication Water Quality Other Copies Total f'• P ? Insulation sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. MC/ES System City Water Fire Sprinklered Q Plumbing ? Stucco/Stone Building C 0 Engineering $1,397.55 Variance VALUATION $157,278.00 % SAC SAC Units Meter Size 2440 North Charles Street COMMERCIAL 2002 $UILD G PERMIT APPLICATION S o a y OF EAGAN 651-681-4675 Foundation Only New Construction Interior Improvement • Structural Plans (2) sets • Architectural Plans (2) sets • Architectural Plans (2) sets • Civil Plans (2) • Structural Plans (2) • Code Analysis (1) • Certificate of Survey (1) • Civil Plans (2) • Project Specs (1) • Code Analysis (1) • Landscaping Plans (2) • Key Plan (1) • Project Spew (1) • Code Analysis 0)• "'. Master Exit Plan (1) • Spec. Insp. & Testing Schedule • Certificate of Survey (1) Energy Calculations (1) not always** • Soils Report (1) • Spec. Insp.& Testing Schedule (1)" • Elec. Power & Lighting Form (1) not always- • Meter size must be established • Meter size must be established Meter size must be established - if applicable • Project Specs (1) 1 • Energy Calculations (1) 1 • Electric Power & Lighting Form (1) *` 1 1 • Master Exit Plan (1) 1 1 • Emergency Response Site Plan (1) `** 1 1 • Soils Report (1) t • MC/ES SAC determination letter • MCIES SAC determination letter MCIES SAC determination letter call 651-602.1000 call 651-602-1000 ca11 6 5 1-6 02-1ono , Food & beverage or lodging facilities -submit plan to MN Uepartment oT mean. Gan Oo I-CID-u ruu wi u-11- Contact Building Inspections for sample. Permit for new buildings or additions will not be processed without Emergency Response Site Plan. Ask Building Inspections for requirements. AAP DATE: 11-15-02 _ WORK TYPE: _ NEW _ REMODEL CONSTRUCTION COST: I no, &O D SITEADDRESS: 3650,?0&fa EaQan?IIIV TENANT NAME: West Group - Hanco Bldg SUITE #: FORMER TENANT NAME, IF APPLICABLE: DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPERTY OWNER CONTRACTOR Tear off and reroof. 4-ply bui I P. „ Name: Thomson Legal and Regulatory Phone#:( Last First I Street Address: 610 Opperman Dr City: Eagan State: Company: Berwald Roofing Co., Inc. Street Address: City: North Saint Paul State: MN Zip: 55109 ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER Company: Name: Street Address: City: Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone #: _„ ? I fir, r Zip: 55121 Phone#: ( 651 ) 777-7411 Phone #: ( Registration #: State: _ Zip: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the information is T'J'. and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Applicant: ):? Updated 7r02 Dakota County Real Estate Inquiry Dakota County Real Estate Inquiry Data Updated 3/12/2008. Need Help? What's New? Map navigation Select option and click on map: ??? Zoom In O Zoom Out 17 Pan :.i Identify Show Full County Map Small Map Details Tax Stub Statement Plat Neighborhood Page 1 of I Legend Real. Estate Parcels El Parcels ® Common, Ownership II ®, RAW. Easement ? Dedicated RM J Tax Parcels Market Value "Recent Sales Year Built 'Air Photo CrTorrens Choose ONE search method, enter criteria, and click Go or hit enter key. House #: God OR PIN: 13501 Birds Eye PIN: 10-88101-010-01 2009 Est_Value._{Pay_able 2010 $1,597,900 Owner: WEST PUBLISHING CO 2008 Taxable Value Payable2 09): $1,601,500 Pavable 2009 Tax: $47,730.02 Address: 3650 DODD RD Total Acreage: 2.35 City: EAGAN, MN N 551 55123 Year Built: 1988 PLEASE READ DISCLAIMER This application was developed by the Dakota County Office of Gl5 in cooperation with Assessing Services and the Property Tagatio Records Departments click on the Dakota County Logo above to return to the home page http://207.171.98.200/scripts/esrimap.dl]?Name=webq 1 &Left=526998.264594694&Botto... 3/13/2009 41p? City of Evan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 2008 FIRE SUPPRESSION -------- I For Office Use?j / I ? Permit & #: I I 1 Permit Fee: ??• J? I f Date Receivedxn •?7 / / ,/ `/-(/ ` / Staff: I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: Site Address: for Tenant: Akan L D Suite #: PROPERTY OWNER Name: W 0 ( o Phone: _ U?? I C Address / City / Zip: LO"? V ? ? ? ?a'? l 5512-? ? t t li i O V C wner rac or App cant on s: - TYPE OF WORK Description of work: Construction Cost: 525• c7Z> Estimated Completion Date: b CONTRACTOR (, r l Name: License #: D l Address: JO ( JD'(1L (p/ L ! 1 l ?? ??`l?S City: t5-?4 P1,A)1 State: ?J -Zip: Phone: Contact Person: FIRE PERMIT TYPE WORK TYPE V/ Sprinkler System (# of heads !?j _ New Fire Pump Addition - Alterations - Standpipe _ _ Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial Residential -Educational FEES $50.50 Minimum (includes State Surcharge) OR Contract Value $ 150 00 X11% $ Permit Fee - If Permit Fee is less than $1,000, surcharge is $.50. = $ State Surcharge - If Permit Fee is > $1,000, surcharge increases by $.50 for each $1,000 Permit Fee (i.e. a $1,001-$2,000 Permit Fee requires a $1.00 surcharge). '• o FEE $ c> TOTAL 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $183.00 $ Fire Meter $ TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans, x Nvnot, Moll ck xm . gnatur ?? Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Slgnatur FOR OFFICE USE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Hydrostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test Rough In Trip Pump Test Central Station Final Conditions of Issuance: Permit Reviewed by: Date: /!9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY STATE OF ILLINOIS St. COUNTY OF KANE On thin 7th day of January - 19 88 , before me, Evelyn L. Lag-e a notary public in and for the County and State aforesaid, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, appeared ® personally known to me TltsniFSg (]trta-TltPth , --- - - - ? proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the attorney-in-fact of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corpora- tion executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, t have hereunto set my band and affixed my official seal, at my office in the aforesaid County, the day and year in this certificate first above written. OvFI,C;IAL Spa (SEAL) cdt:..YN ;_. LAGE r?OTgR1? F'!JE3LIC Z'.ATE OF ILLINOIS M> OOI MISSIUtt'?XPIRES 10-05-91 Individual STATE OF COUNTY OF Notar ubtit In and for the C..., 101 Kendall State of Illinois ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY PRINCIPAL is. On this day of. ,19_, before me, a notary public in and for the County and State aforesaid, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, appeared ? personally known to me -- --- ? proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that T he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, at my office in the aforesaid County, the day and year in this certificate frst above :written. (SEAL) Partnership STATE OF COUNTY OF JS. On this day of ,19-_, before me, , a notary public in and for the County and State aforesaid, residing therein, drily commissioned and sworn, appeared ? personally known to me -- ? proved to me on the has is of satisfactory evidence to he one of the partners of the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that .such partner- ship executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, at my office in the aforesaid County, the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Corporation ri? 2 0 } STATE OF Notary Public in and for the County State of _ JJ. COUNTY OF On this (ra*dayof rr. a?4 -'19 ?, before a notary public in and for the County and S to aforesaid, residing therein, drily commissioned and sworn, ap eared personally known to me Qn / / f - proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the LdZ/l1 (title) of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I.have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, at my office in the aforesaid County, the day and year in this certificate first above written. ' COLLEEN M. CuAa!/;ir.!E; '• -< fie N0TAAY POBLIC-MINM.-")C A _- (SEAL) RAMSEY COUtJiy - Notary Public in an far /the County of , r - f F Yy Comm Ei?ires May 20. 1"7 :'. State of A,16; 7 Z22 i?-W Notary Public in and for the County State of C??1 BOND No 8294 82 89 FREMIUM f 30.00 MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY 4680 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90010 CONTRACTORS BOND Know all men by these Presents: THAT WE 0• Larry Lee DBA: Providence Builders Corporation as principal, and MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation duly licensed for the purpose of making, guarantee- ing or becoming sole surety upon bonds or undertakings required or authorized by the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the-City of Ewan , in the sum of TWO THOUSAND— DOLLARS ($2,000.00-lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The Condition of the foregoing obligation is such, that WHEREAS, under the Provisions of the applicable Ordinances of the Code of the City of Eacran , before any license for 2OZerty Contractor shall be issued, there must be deposited by the applicant with the ____C_it]_ Clerk of said City a good and sufficient bond in said sum, payable to the Cl Y of and executed by the applicant to the satisfaction and approval of said City Clerk. Fagan NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden Principal shall pay all charges required by the applicable Ordinances of the Code of the?ltTnf TrA 3n , and shall faithfully and properly perform all work of Contractor under all permits issued to said Principal to the satisfaction of said-City Clerk, and shall pay an), and all refilling and resurfacing charges due the--C-ity Of Eagan and pay all damages sustained by said City _ by reason of faulty or defective work under such permits, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The Surety herein reserves the right to withdraw as such Surety, except as to any liability already incurred or accrued hereunder, and do so upon the giving of written notice of such withdrawal to the_ MY Clerk of the City of Fagan ; provided, however, that no withdrawal shall be effective for any purpose until thirty (30) days shall have elapsed from and after the receipt of such notice by the said?',],ty Clerk. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WITNESS OUR HAND this the 7tla day Of_r72IIU 8 By- [SEAL] 11 V Principal Mi Insurance Canpany COUNTERSIGNATCIRES, a Surely /^} By. d.6-Tt?Fl_ Cif ?(,t,1T "`? ?Ip? .Denise CUrts-LUeth Attorney in Fact Reti4enl Agent of St Cly" All Signatures Must Be Acknowledged Before a Notary Public. 56.1:18 a-ea u1 62 -OVER- "'^ lc' IF=S: F=-.;: C.3 tAJi :fir F, F:t::%: d',4 d d -_ IF' F Z , =C UNA C:.. 1521 93RD LANE N.E., MINNEAPOLIS, NN 55434 HYDRAULIC DESIGN INFORMATION SHEET Project Name: HANCO BLDG. (WH::iE:) .495/200) Date: JULY 20, 19BB Calc bye JOHN SMOI-UCH Sht 01a of 9 -------------------------- Protection by: ARROW SPRINKLER, INC. 1521 93RD LANE h(. E. BLAINE, MINN. 55434 Property- HANCO BUILDING WAREHOUSE: AREA CA'LC., E:AGAN, MINN. --------------------------------------------------------- SYSTEM DESIGN & CALC SUMMARY: HAZARD DESCRIPTION: :irl% OF WHSE. RACKING OF INNER TUBES AND SMALL SPEC.:IA LTY TIRES FOR TRAILERS & LAWNMOWERS IN BOXES AND 507, OF WHSE RACKING TO 20 FT. U F TIRE CHANGING EQUIPMENT ON NON--L::hl(: APSL.IAI_TE:D PALLETS. MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA == .495 GPM DENSITY/ 2,000.0 SO FT AREA BASED ON N. F. P. A. N231 C FIG. #h6--'11.., 1D CURVE E: v/ WET SYS_F.I_M SPK:R ORIF. SIZE = .64 K-FACTOR :._ 71.1 REQUIRED WATER AS CALCULATED: SYSTEM REII''T I /S HOSE &/OR RACK. ALLOW. OUTSIDE HOSE (OR COMBINED) TOTAL. WATER REQUIREMENT PRESSURE REG' D: @ P. O. C,. 72.6 F',. S. 1 WATER SUPPLY,. 1021.48 GPM 100.00 GPM AT H.G.R. 400, carp GPM 1521.46 GPM AT P.O.C. @ H.O.R.:-. 64.65 F.S.T. STATIC PRESSURE: so F': S. I . RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 70 F'. S. I. @ 1410 G.P.M. FLOWING FLOW TEST DATE; ......- ------ I_OCATIONi --------- INFORMATION gOURCE: CITY OF EAGAN WATER DEL-T. FLOW GRAPH SUMMARY. TOTAL PRESSURE AVAIL ABLE @ 1521.4B G.P.M. _ 77. 6913 ---- .TOTAL. WATER AVAILABLE ---------------------------- @ 72.60 ----------- F. B. ---- I . - 2859.93 ------------ - AHHRE'V IAT IONS: PT - PRESSURE TOTAL. E - 90 DEG. ELL BV - BUTTERFLY VA PE • - PRESS. ELEVATION EE - 45 DEB. ELL.. GV -- BATE VALVE PF - P. FRICTION LOSS LT -- LON G TURN CV - CHECK: VALVE PO - P. a OUTLET/SPKR T - TEE DEV -- DETECTOR OV CALCULATION SEQUENC[?-. P.S.I.. G. P. M. ALV - ALARM VA DELV -- DELUGE VA DPV -- DRY PIPE STR - STRAINER OUTLET (or- sprinkler) TABLEaa Discharge Summary - Shows miry. Flows @ all Outlets. ROUTE #1 DESCRIPTION: Primary Wafer Path - from starting Sprinkler- to Supply point -- followed by subsequent Primary Paths. LEG (pipe) TABLE: Describes ALL PIPES used in System Calculation.. NOTE 1: Minus Flows are being supplied from OPPOSITE DIRECTION. NOTE lst positive Flow in RC1UTEi. 41 is usually MOST REMOTE: SPRINKLER.,