The URL can be used to link to this page

1527 Deerwood Bend*(Center for Energy and Environment CEE Home Solutions Moisture Inspection Repart F-AGAfZ! REVl EW Report Prepared For: Lisa Joritz, MW Johnson Construction 1527 Deerwood Bend, Eagan, MN 412 3rd Avenue North. Suite 560 ? Minneapotis, MN 55401 A Phone: (612) 335-5856 e Fax: (612) 335-5888 www.mncee.org W-kA -. _._? I ?'J( Project Information Owners NA Client MW Johnson Property Address 1527 Deerwood Bend siuiny address 17645 Juniper Path ciry, scate, ziP Eagan, MN city, state, ziP Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone Phone 952-892-5200 emaii Emaii bryanwolfe@ mwjoh nson. com Owners Realtor Clientagent Lisa JoritZ Reaity Company Realty Company Phone Phone 952-892-7337 emaii Type of Exterior Cladding front, vinyl rear email Date of Inspection LJoritr@mwjohnson.com 8/11/06 930 am Stories 1 Inspector Jim Fitrgerald FloorArea (st) NA Present at Inspection Masonry subs, Terry of MWJ, InspeCtions personnel. Underlying Substrate NA outdoor Temperature I Humidity 77F 61 %RH, partly Age of Property < 10 ye81'S Indoor Temperature / Humid'Ry na Notes walkout wall adjacent to rear slider, front wall retest Days Since Last Rain Heavy rain within last 24 hours Center for Energy and Environment ? 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 ? web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08/11/06 Summary results: We made limited moisture measurements behind vinyl siding in rear plus an examination under landscape stone at 1527 Deerwood Bend, Eagan on August 11, 2006. The purpose of this test was to assess moisture conditions in the frame wall on either side of the sliding door in the rear walkout wall and assess effectiveness of capping front concrete block wall under the main entry. The rear wall tested dry in all sheathing measurements and just above the dry range at the front of the cavity near the poly consistent with airconditioning and slight reverse vapor drive but not an indication of rain entry. Materials were firm in all samples and no indication of deterioration was found. The block wall showed active drairiage with new openings provided from corner cores to drain tile. Visual and moisture meter inspection indicated additional diversion of water at entry was recommended to reduce future entry and prevent weathering at corner with entry sidewalk. Recommendations to limit water entry and buildup: No additional work is required at the rear adjacent to the east slider in the walkout wall. Inspection results do not indicate rain entry and either short term or long term moisture buildup, no saturation or deterioration was found in multipte measurements. See photo page 5. Provide a permenant concrete pad sloped to drain the corner beiween the front sidewalk and the downspout at the stucco wall in front. see photo page 6. Concrete pad should cover soil and extend in a triangle no less than 24" wide at the edge in contact with the house and 36" long at the edge in contact with the sidewalk. The masonry subcontractor began installation during our visit. The purpose of this pad is to reduce future settling in the corner and limit water buildup. This should limit the rate of future wetting at the front corner and allow normal damproofong and drainage to maintain dry conditions inside in the future. 5ince the drainage holes inside were just installed prior to my test, I cannot confirm this extra concrete is required, but rather it is recommended as an extra precaution to reduce concerns about the future. Cleaning and coating the basement wall with a permeable paint can proceed if desired once drainage effects show drying continues through next rainfall. Moisture measurement specifics: The numbers listed on area photographs below are the as measured readings of the material at each location in moisture % by weight. The Delmhorst meters used were calibrated for wood and readings in masonry are qualitative. There was significant rain the evening before this test. Conditions were good for finding moisture buildup due to rain if it was occuring. The meters used tested within calibration. Temperatures were within the normal calibration range. Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 ? Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08111/06 rear wall outside sheathing dry ? ? ? ? ? end dam caulking on deck ledqer in place leftwall sheathing 7,8 firm dryexReriorgypsum left sill plate at ZO firm Slight elevation consistent with high July humidity not slab rain entry right wall sheathingby 9,11,9 fPm dryeMeriorgypsum door right wall sheathing below window and 8,8,8 firm dry exterior gypsum hose bibb nght sill plate at 19 firm Slght elevation consistent vnih high July humidity not slab rain entry. fiberglass ?ry Fiberglass sample from bottom of wall dry and pink like insulation new. Center for Energy and Environment ? 272 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 ? Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08111106 siding open wall ok inside view comer inspect cap on block tops, installed as recommended closeup possible small entry below edge, recommend divert water at comer low spot. fill comer with concrete sloped away from house. This will maintain grade below framing as required and reduce settling, ponding, and wetting time. mason beginning work to provide permanent drainage pad at comer. wet soil lower at corner adds uncertainty pad location: from control . oint to wall b downspout Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 ? Fax: 612.335.5888 ? web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08111/06 triangular pad at low spot Background on moisture and testing If the rate of moisture entry exceeds the rate of drying, moisture accumulation can result. If moisture accumulation exceeds the storage capacity of the building material, deterioration can result. Since walls may have reduced drying, testing for moisture buildup in hidden materials is prudent. All moisture found is not necessarily from an exterior source. Water can enter a building in the building materials during construction, can enter from rain or runoff from melting or ice dams, rising damp from ground water, or be generated inside by human activity including plumbing leaks, humidification and combustion spillage. Pathways for moisture entry include exterior openings in the weatherbarrier and flashings for liquids, interior air barrier penetrations subject to stack and duct pressures for air transported moisture, and porous materials in contact with ground water or damp cladding for capillary movement. Construction moisture usually dries in year 1, and is no longer an issue after that. More than one pathway can work at once. Over interpretation of small changes in or near the normal range is not recommended. Material that has been previously damaged by fungal growth may show softening, swelling or other deterioration. Penetrating pins usually show soft materials behind the stucco where deterioration is present. Discoloration may result from one time wetting during atypical wind conditions, storage or construction and is not by itself evidence of an ongoing problem. Water that enters but quickly drains out is less of a concern than water held for prolonged periods in contact with fibrous building materials. Wintertime condensation in the wall is usually at the battlsheathing interFace, which also tends to selectively wet the sheathing. Bulk water entry from plumbing, roof and window leaks is the first largest source of excess water followed by excess humidification in the winter and condensation of moist air on cold sheathing behind siding and roofing. High moisture readings alone do not determine the source or pathway. If repair does not address and control the source or transport mechanism, then a recurrence is likely. During the heating season, any moisture distributed in the wall cavity will move toward the colder sheathing. In a wall with fiberglass insulation, liquid will drain to the lowest part of the wall. The bottom plate and sheathing near the bottom plate are likely to have the highest wall moisture content in northern frame construction. If the highest moisture content at the wettest locations is within normal limits, then the wall assembly is performing as intended (drying) and further destructive testing is not justified. Drying in a northern wall with an interior poly vapor barrier is primarily to the outside and is faster in winter than summer. During the summer cooling season, some moisture movement to the backside of the interior poly can occur when vapor drive reverses, especially in partial basement walls, walls with no weather barrier, and on the south and west walls with sun exposure on brick and stucco. This summertime effect is secondary in our heating dominated Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 ? Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08N1/06 climate. The wall cavities have significant moisture storage capacity in the substantial amount of dry wood fiber currently below 19% moisture by weight. This storage capacity is enough to handle cycling of small seasonal moisture changes. We test under window corners and mull joints and samples at other potential leakage sites. Since liquid water will run down to the bottom of the wall from whatever source, that is an area we also target for sampling. We sample the lowest part of the wall in the material closest to the exterior. Wintertime condensation usually forms high and then can run down in a slightly different pattern. Tests in the sheathing below the rim joist and below upper soffits and cavities with ductwork pressurization can show winter buildup areas. Visual and physical examination of the material behind the stucco or exterior siding is the best way to determine the extent of moisture intrusion, related construction details and possible damage. However, we believe that stucco or exterior siding removal for inspection purposes or to change a minor detail is unjustified without evidence of moisture buildup or previous damage as shown by elevated moisture readings or soft materials found. Moisture testing provides the benefit of showing the limits of moisture accumulation and can help determine the source in many cases. If the source of moisture is the interior, additional remedies are required to prevent recurrence. In many areas of the country, moisture content measurements as performed here allow repair work to be focused at areas with possible damage, reducing unnecessary repairs. This test and report is not a warranty against future moisture entry or accumulation, but our best interpretation of ineasurements of wall moisture conditions made with the house at this time. Homeowner maintenance is assumed to continue as needed on all plumbing, roofing, drainage, sump pump, furnaces and other mechanical systems. This test result does not provide a license to ignore moisture concerns altogether. Wintertime humidifier operation should be managed to minimize cold surtace condensation. This. requires moderating the interior humidity to lower levels such as 25-35% as the average outside temperature drops below freezing. Air from inside will leave its moisture on any surface below its dewpoint as it moves through the wall assembly and building cavities. Keeping interior humidity at or above 50% in winter for long periods in climates like this has shown serious wetting potential in structures not specifically designed for wintertime humidity control. We can only observe conditions and measure moisture present at the time of our visit. Wintertime condensation effects are better seen in cold weather and at the end of winter. A layer of moisture in a wall from winter may redistribute and dry before temperatures rise enough for deterioration to begin. Normal moisture cycling without damage may complicate interpretation of limited inspections, but it does not justify extreme repairs. Areas covered by construction such as plumbing and foundation walls behind finished surfaces are beyond the scope of this investigation. Direction and force Center for Energy and Environment ? 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 ? Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08111106 of wind during rains may leave some areas wetter than others with similar construction issues and less exposure. Foundation moisture sources can be non-uniform in location and time. This Report provides CEE's opinions, findings, and conclusions regarding the Services. The content contained in the Report supercedes any other oral or written information or advice CEE, its agents or employees, provided to you concerning the Services. You should not rely on any information or advice provided 6y CEE, its agents or employees that is not contained in this Report or that contradicts information or advice contained in the Report unless CEE provides such information and advice as a written addendum to this Report. The Services and the Report are based only on the information available, the areas tested, and the conditions that existed at the time the physical inspection and testing performed in connection with the Senrices occurred. Some environmental conditions, including but not limited to mold and moisture conditions, can develop rapidly. Neither the performance of the Services nor the contents of this Report provide a guarantee as to any conditions that may develop or have developed at any other time. CEE, its agents and employees are not health professionals and cannot diagnose or determine the cause of health-related matters. It is your responsibility to seek the advice of a health professionai if you or someone else is experiencing any health-related symptoms. You should not rely upon any health related statements made by CEE, its agents or employees, and CEE expressly disclaims any responsibility and liability for any statements or advice it or any of its agents or employees make concerning health-related matters. Center for Energy and Environment ? 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 08111106 , ..: ; . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . :._ . ,:. ._. . . ? MW JOHNSONCONSTRUCTION, INC. ? To: City of Eagan Building Inspections - ? Fromi MW Johnson Construction, Inc: . Date: IvIay 7; 2004 '. . Re: 1527 Deerwood'Bend,,Woodstone Develop'ment . ? .: : This lettet is in reference to the water intrusion problem that was noted ori a framing .. ? -- inspection dated September. 6, 2002.At;hat time there was eyidence of water in the ' Basement:area as well as the front door area, and at that time there was no explanation for it.. The supervisor on.the site did note that the Basement sliding patio door and front door ' ?were left open prior to the inspection and it was possible that .weather played a role in that water being evident.. Throughont ther`est of the.constiuction'p"rocess andnumerous; inspections by city officials, their.were no further signs of any type of unnatural water intrusion into the basement. The moisture noted on the block wall on south side has been a common occurrence:prior to final grade`and establishing turfuound the area Several on site inspections by our;epresentatives have been conducted in the pasf two yeazs,.and to tlus•date there is still no evidence bf any unnatural moisture intrusion into .. `. , the basement or,the entire home for that matter: , We appreciate your concem iri this ? matter, and feel as if all necessary measures have beeri takeri to rectify any possible water . intrusion. .: Thank you; sF. oP' ? kl/V . MW Johnso Constnxction Supervisor . Cc: City of Eagan ' MW Johnson Constiuction File` ' .17645 JIINIPER PATH • SUITE 100 • LAKEVILtiE, MN 55044• (952) 892-5200- - P?7 /?'Zit /L wo-r} %iziv,,y Inspection comments removed from PIMS 7/24/06 to make room for more comments 6/7/02 JTW framing - provide truss spec for cut trusses in the kitchen - firestop dead space behind energy wall at the lid - fire stop dead space above bsmt fire place - firestop lid at dead space behind bsmt shower - db15/8" gyp return bottom of joists at common wall **** OK to insulate lst floor**** 6/11/02 JTW insulation - none of the above corrections have been completed . - provide documentation previously requested - Identify and correct source of water at the front foundation wall in the bsmt 9/6/02 JTW LL framing - remove and replace moldy gyp and insulation and flooring at both sides of the front door - remove vapor barrier and insulation and identify water intrusion at bsmt patio door - identify and repair water intrusion at south foundation wall in mech rm 02-10-03 JTW final - appliance balance sheet and Orsat test result RCV'D - remove plbg test caps DONE jtw - add house #'s DONE jtw - caulk siding penetrations DONE jtw - caulk butt joint in deck ledger DONE jtw - seal penetration in garage fire wall at gas line penetrarion done tm - seal attic access in gazage done tm - add hand rail to bsmt stair DONE jtw - bsmt fire place -ML 6-19-02 ?? - bsmt fireplace air test done tm - a correction notice was written 09-06-02 for lower level framing requesting that contractor identify water intrusion problems in three places ( front door, through the block at the south wa11 of the Mechanical room and azound the the bsmt patio door). No inspections were ever performed after that date and those three area are now covered up. In lieu of our ability to determine iFthese corrections were adequately addressed we are requesting a letter from the contractor detailing what steps were taken to mitigate the water intrusion problem. Further, a moisture test should be performed in the spring after the ground thaws to enstire that the problem has been resolved. [letter is in the parcel file still need a moisture test] 05/07/04 JTW final - no access to the residence - seal penetration in gazage fire wall at gas line penetration DONE jtw 3/8/05 - seal attic access in garage done tm - bsmt fireplace air test done tm - still need moisture test results 03/08/OS JTW - at the request of the homeowner I went to look at some water damage the damage is in the garage wall at the front stoop (behind the stucco) the homeowner claims that the water pools against the gaxage wall at the front door when it rains - the foundation wall at the mech room under the front door appears dry at this time but there is evidence of water infiltration (lattinence on the block) - there is no visisble evidence of water intrusion at the lower level patio door - the bsmt fireplace still needs an air test done tm - the attic access in the garage is open done tm - the gas line is sealed at the gazage fire wall 1/10/06 Final TM -Met with Terry Fullerton & Mick Gergen of MW Johnson, they had a subcontractor put an air test on gas line for fireplace which passed and sealed the atUc access. No moisture test was performed. Mick Gergen told Terry Fullerton to line up a independent party to perform moisture test at outside walls near patio door. The foundation wall issue from above has not been resolved 1/1806 TM Sent letter to M.W. Johnson to get corrections done by 6/15/06 7/6/06 TM Center for Energy and Enviroment ---CEE HOME SOLUTIONS is the name of independent party that did moisture testing -moisture test recieved, tests were only on front foundation wall -drove by and noticed a contractor working on site, stopped and asked what they were doing and he told me that he fixed the water problem by filling up cores of block at front stoop area and added a course of block near stoop azea in garage. I asked if he had set up an inspection and he did not know. Address: 1527 Deerwood Bend Zip: 55122 Lot: 6 Block: 1 Subdivision: Woodstone Townhomes THE FOLLOWING TTEMS WERE/WERE NOT COMPLETE AT FINAL INSPECTION ON Yes No Comments Final grade - 6" from siding tl? Permanent ste s - arage Permanent sYe s- main entry v Permanent drivewa ?/. Permanent gas (i Sod/Seeded lawn ? Trail/curb damage Porch JL Lower level finish Deck Fireplace ?j • Verify with your builder tliat coof test caps from the plumbing system have been removed. • Turn off water supply to the outside lawn faucets before freeze potential exists. • Call the City's Engineering Depariment at 651-681-4645 prior to working in right-of way or installing irrigation system. BUILDING INSPECTOR " ? cd/bldginsp/fortnsY2002/tinal inspection checklis[ i?a iasizoos Txu s:as Fnx 9528929770 ?l ? oolioio MW,JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION, lNC. Since 1971 Date ? "?'OLP Wessage fof ( CyY ) f"i i Fa-X num6er_&.,,5/ Trom - - -. 111 Wessage 07/06/2006 THU 9:46 FAX 9528929770 Qoozioio Center for Ene(gy qf)d Environment CEE Home Solutions IVloisture Inspection F2eport Repbrt:Prepared For. Lisa Joritz, MW Johnson: Construction 1527 Deerwo'od;Bend;: Eagan; MN 272 3rd Avenue North, Sulte 560 w Minneapalls, MN 55407 w Phone: (672) 335-5W e fax: (612) 335-5888 www.mn.cee.org 07/06/2006 TfiU 9:46 FAA 9528929770 Tofal Number of Window Unifs Zooaioia not relevant to basement below sidewalk corner Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 ? Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 ? Fax: 612.335.5668 A web site: www.mncee,org Date of Inspecfion: 06I22106 07/06/2006 THU 9:47 FAA 9528929770 Zoonioio Summary results: We made limited moisture measurements plus an examination under landscape stone at 1527 Deerwood Bend, Eagan on June 22, 2006. The purpose of this test was to assess moisture conditions in the concrete block wall at the front of the basement under the main entry and front wall. The block wall surtace showed some efflorescence but tested dry in all locations except the at the very bottom of the corner under the joint between the exterior wall and entry slab. This location appeared darker wvisually and felt damp to the touch. See attached photo 'page 6 Recommendations to limit water entry and buildup: Seal, fill tops of block cores partly under entry slab edge from sidewalk to insulation on front wall, see atfached photo page 7. Seal the vertical joint between the stucco and entry slab, but maintain drainage from the weep screed on the horizontal joint. Provide additional weep hole or holes from inside at bottom of block wall in corner to improve drainage into tile and sump system. We recommend against coating the basement wall at this time unfil successful water control can be observed after additional rainfall or equivalent test. Moisture measurement speciflcs: The numbers listed on area photographs below are the as measured readings of the material at each location in moisture % by weight. The Delmhorst meters used were calibrated for wood and readings in masonry are qualitative. Measurements up ta 20% indicate dry masonry and readings over 20% indicate wet masonry. We found potential false positive readings in the efflorescence salts on the surface, but confirming tests showed dry material on mosst wal{ surfaces. The bottom corner showed saturation on every test with both meters was dark and felt damp to the touch. A simpl'rfied watar test from outside in the vicinity of the wettest block showed significant openings with entry into the foundation block cores; and is likely the primary source of interior moisture seen previously. After these openings are closed and slope irnproved, moisture entry shoutd be much reduced. Monitaring this wall From inside for a period is prudent in case another hidden pathway is contributing. There was significant rain during the weekend and monihs before this test. Conditions were good for finding moisture buildup due to rain if it was occuring. The meters used tested witfiin calibration. Temperatures were within the normal calibration range, Center for Energy and Environment s 212 3rd Avenue North, Sufte 560 - fs9inneapolis, MN 55401 ' Ph: 612.335.5858 ? Fax: 612.335.5868 ? web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06122106 07/06/2006 THU 9:47 FAX 9528929770 Front basement wall substantially dry wall under entry 10-73 dry masonry readings 6elow 20% on wood scale indicate dry material wall under bay 9 dry walll in all locations except boltom corner, see next window ,10,20 d?Y page wall between 14 dry detail photo 2_ Qoosioio 5 Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suife 560 AL Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 e Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06122106 07i06i2006 Txv s:as rAx 9528929770 bottom carner wet at outside edge wet corner Qoosioio Center for Energy and Environment w 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: O6(22106 1 "-2" water in sump 07/06/2006 THU 9:98 FAY 9528929770 base view outside Zoo7ioio at boEtom of cores ment above wet corner some soil had settled and possibly washed into open water test runs in wet cores below entry slab adjacent to corner with wet area below. gravel moved and hose test performed water into wall detail 2: more water shows seal ended at insulation and cores open r(rom corner to sidewalk cap block cores al iop and seal joint to stucco, add more soil below plastic to provide positive stope away from house under stone. Provide weep hole from inside to recommend block core In comer to aid drainage Into sump. Leave basement wall uncoated for now unlii water performance can be ohserved after additional rains_ subcontractor present was notified and is in process of providing this repair, entry point water pours Into open Center for Energy and Environment A 272 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapoiis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 ? Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06/22106 07/06/2006 THU 9:49 FA% 9528929770 Background on moisture and testing If the rate of moisture entry exceeds the rate of drying, moisture accumulation can result. If moisture accumulation exceeds the storage capacity of the building material, deterioration can result. Since walls may have reduced drying, testing for moisture buildup in hidden materials is prudent. All moisture found is not necessarily from an exterior source. . Water can enter a building in the building materials during construction, can enter from rain or runoff from melting or ice dams, rising damp from ground water, or be generated inside by human activity including plumbing Ieaks, humidification and combustion spillage. Pathways for moisture entry include exterior openings in the weatherbarrier and flashings for liquids, interior air barrier penetrations subject to stack and duct pressures for air transported moisture, and porous materials in contact with ground water or damp cladding for capillary movement. Construction moisture usually dries in year 1, and is no longer an issue after that. More than one pathway can work at once. Over interpretation of small changes in or near the normal range is not recommended. Material that has been previously damaged by fungal growth may show softening, swelling or other deterioration. Penetrating pins usually show soft materials behind the stucco where deterioration is present. Discoloration may result from one time wetting . during atypical wind conditions, storage or construction and is not by itself evidence of an ongoing problem. Water that enters but quickly drains out is less of a concem than wafer held for prolonged periods in con4act with fibrous building materials. Wintertime condensation in the wall is usually at the batUsheathing interface, which also tends to selectively wet the sheathing. Bulk water entry from plumbing, roof and window leaks is the first largest source of excess water followed by excess humidification in the winter and condensaGon of moist air on cold sheathing behind siding and roofing. High moisture readings alone do not determine the source or pathway. If repair does not address and control the source or transport mechanism, then a recurrence is likely. During the heating season, any moisture distributed in the wall cavity will move toward the colder sheathing. In a wall with fiberglass insulation, liquid will drain to the lowest part of the wall. The bottom plate and sheathing near the boftom plate are likely to have the highest wall moisture content in northern frame construction. If the highest moisture content at the wettest locations is within normal limits, then fhe wall assembiy is pertorming as intended (drying) and further destructive testing is notjustified. Drying in a northern wall with an interior poly vapor barrier is primarily to the outside and is faster in winter than summer. During the summer cooling season, some moisture movement to the backside of the interior poly can occur when vapor drive reverses, especial{y in partial basement walls, walls with no weather barrier, and on the south and west walis with sun exposure on brick and stucco. This summertime effect is secondary in our heating dominated Qooaioio Center for Energy and Environment ? 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06I22/06 07/06/2006 THU 9:49 FAX 9528929770 climate. The wall cavities have significant moisture storage capacity in the substantial amount of dry wood fiber currently below 19% moisture by weight. This storage capacity is enough ta handle cycling of small seasonal moisture changes. We test under window corners and mull joints and samples at other potential leakage sites. Since liquid water will run down to the bottom of the wall from whatever source, that is an area we also target for sampling. We sample the lowest part of the wall in the materiai closest to the exterior. Wintertime condensation usually forms high and then can run down in a slightly different pattern. Tests in the sheathing below the rim joist and below upper soffits and cavities with ductwork pressurization can show winter buildup areas. Visual and physical examination of the material behind the stucco or exterior siding is the best way to determine the extent of moisture intrusion, related construction details and possi6le damage. However, we believe that stucco or exterior siding removal for inspection purposes or to change a minor detail is unjustified without evidence of moisture buildup or previous damage as shown by e[evated moisture readings or soft materials found. Moisture testing provides the benefit of showing the Iimits of moisture accumulation and can help determine the source in many cases. If the source of moisture is the interior, additional remedies are required to prevent recurrence. In many areas of the country, moisture content measurements as performed here allow repair work to be focused at areas with possible damage, reducing unnecessary repairs. This test and report is not a warranty against future moisture entry or accumulation, but our best interpretation of ineasurements of wall moisture conditions made with the house at this time. Hameowner maintenance is assumed to continue as needed on all plumbing, roofing, drainage, sump pump, furnaces and other mechanical systems. This test result does not provide a license to ignore moisture concerns altogether. Wintertime humidifier operation should be managed to minimize cold surface condensation. This requires moderating the interior humidity to lower levels such as 25-35% as fhe average outside temperature drops below freezing. Air from inside willleave its moisture on any surtace below its dewpoint as it moves through the wall assembly and building cavities. Keeping interior humidity at or above 50% in winter for long periods in climates like this has shown serious wetting potential in structures not specifically designed for wintertime humidify control. We can only observe conditions and measure moisture present at the time of our visit. Wintertime condensation effects are better seen in cold weather and at the end of winter. A layer of moisture in a wail from winter may redistribute and dry before temperatures rise enough for deterioration fo begin. Normal moisture cycling without damage may complicate interpretation of limited inspections, but it does not justify extreme repairs. Areas covered by construction such as plumbing and foundafion walls behind finished surFaces are beyond the scope of this investigation. Direction and force Qoosiaio Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5856 A Fax: 612.335.5888 A web site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06I22106 07i06i2006 T[io 9:49 rna 9528929770 of wind during rains may leave some areas wetter than others with similar constnaction issues and less exposure. Foundation moisture sources can be non-uniform in location and time. This Report provides CEE's opinions, findings, and conclusions regarding the Services. The content contained in the Report supercedes any other oral or written information or advice CEE, its agents or empfoyees, provided to you concerning the Services. You should not rety on any information or advice provided by CEE, its agents or employees that is not containad in this Report or that contradicts information or advice contained in the Report unless CEE provides such information and advice as a written addendum to this Report. The Services and the Report are based only on the information available, the areas tested, and the conditions that existed at the time the physical inspection and testing performed in connection with the Services occurred. Some environmental conditions, inctuding but not limited to mold and moisture conditions, can develop rapidly. Neither the perFormance of the Services nor the contents of this Report provide a guarantee as to any conditions that may develop or have devefoped at any other time. GEE, iYs agents and employees are not health professionals and cannot diagnose or determine the cause of health-related matters. It is your responsibility to seek the advice of a heaith professional if you or someone else is experiencing any heafth-related symptoms. You shoufd not rely upon any health related statements made by CEE, its agents or employees, and CEE expressly disclaims any responsibility and liability for any statements ar advice it or any of its agents or employees make concerning health-reiated matters, zoioioio 10 Center for Energy and Environment A 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 A Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.335.5858 e Fax: 612.335.5868 ? we6 site: www.mncee.org Date of inspection: 06122/O6 6? °rck- I.? S??- wR S DENTI? 6 P '-!q'3o?s ?1`1'1 UJa?c9-??-cnti.? BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ? CITY OF EAGAN I1NP 3830 PILOT KNOB RD - 55122 651-681-4675 ? 0 14a 3 1 ? n \ NewConsMUCtionReouiremenls RemodeUReoairReauiremeMS -I • 3 registered sile surveys showing sq. k. of lat, sq. N. of house; and all roofed areas • 2 copies of plan (20% mauimum lot coverage atlowed) . t sel of Ene[gy Calculatlons for heated addition!"f? • 2 copies of plan showiig beam 8 window s¢es; poured found design, etc.) . 1 site survey for ex1erior additions & decks D C?, • 1 set of Energy Calcuiations . Indicate if home served byseplic system (or additions f • 3 copies of Tree Presenation Plan If lot platted after 711193 . Rim Joist 0elail Options selection sheel (Mdgs with 3 or less uni15) ?„ .? ;l- 2- 3"""'' ia ?? ? • ?-I -U ?. DATE t) - ? ? -O D- VALUATION I ? D, 000 JOB SITE ADDRESS I'Da? ??f \CLU00cJ BPJ'16 IF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING, HOW MANY UNITS? PROPERTY OWNER M Q ) -TO h}'1 SO fl TYPE OP WORK J 1 rl C, I-C. -1-QYYl lI V HL°?Yl e FIREPLACE(S) _ 0t-'1 _ 2 APPLICANT /? ? TU Y1 h 5 D?? PHONE# ???;l V a 77 a0 ADDRESS ? Z6L15 J Uh i? ?Pr/`--LLi L0.V-e V( ( I? ZIPCODE S504"¢ PAGER # CELL PHONE # FAX#`'15Z) 8R3 7R0 G NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ONLY - FILL OUT COMPLETELY Energy Code Category ? MINNI;SOTA RULES 7670 CATEGORY 1 (check one) - Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet Submitted - Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted MINNLSOTA RiJLES 7672 - New Energy Code Worksheet Submitted PlumbingContractor: 54"c-e-U0.?+ P1 VM bi /!C?- Phone#:?!a3 40 9 /g -:3 3 Plum6ing Systcm Includes: _ Water Sohener Iawn Sprinkler Tee: $90.00 Water I-Icater fVo. of R.I. Baths No. of Balhs Mechanical Contractor. Phone # I : 7?)3 I 473 a a o 7 Mcchanical Systcm Includes: _ Air Conditioning Tee: .$70.00 _ Hcat Recovery System _ Sewer/Water Confractor. WPJYt 7? I _z4rC !? Ci r, EcQ l All above information must be submitted prior to processing of application. /56 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the informatio ycorrec a ?compiy with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. SignatureofApplicant IC?Y/ ??' Certificates of Survey Received ?- Tree Preservation Plan Received _ Not Required ?_ Updated 2002 OFFICE USE ONLY ? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex ? 13 16-plex ? 20 Pool ? 30 Acce'ssory Bldg ? 02 SF Dwelling ? OS 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi ? 03 01 of _ plex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4sea.) ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF x 04 02-plex . ? 10 08-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 36 Multi ? OS 03-plex ? 17 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage ? 06 04plex ? 12 12-plex Plbg_Y or _ N ? 25 Miscellaneous X 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish (Bidg)• ? 43 Reroof ? 46 Windows/Doors ? 34 Replacement 'Demolition (Entire Bldg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant Valuation Occupancy -9-3'1-I MC/ES System Census Code Zoning D_ City Water SAC Units Stories I_ Booster Pump Nbr. of Units ? Sq. Ft. PRV Nbr. af Bldgs ? Length $ 2 ? <3 Fire Sprinklered Type of Const jl?QL Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ? Footings (new bldg) X Final/C.O. Footin.-s (deck) Final/No C.O. Footings (addition) _ Plumbing X Foundation _ HVAC Drain Tile Other Ice & Water X Roof X Final Pool Ftgs AidGas Tes[s _ Final - - x Framing ? Siding Stucco _ Stone Fireplace X R.I. x Air Test K Final Windows ne /replacement) ? Insulation - Re[aining Wall ---- - ----- Approved By ----------- , Building Inspector ----- Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC ciry sac Water Supply & Storage S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit License Search Copies Other Total n PL£X W ITH p£GKS ?r/NIS/&,On a /S.kS ic /'-7 C"ii- /3^s£r1 r/?T- j 2 9?g X? zr-?a = 3-n y ZS' Mtj (^J : 70 6?s6 aL ? 3a q ? X sy ?Ci = 9 ? 6 ? S?3 ? X ST?p .1? 3o.aU - " 9U z3pi X 20c) 0 Q ?Gr l/ `P, 1? 6? MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Minnesota Energy Code NIlVcheck Software Version 3.0 COUNTY: Dakota STATE: Minnesota ZONE: 2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family DATE: 1-24-2002 DATE OF PLANS: 01-24-02 PROJECT I Lot 6 Woodstone UMqPA5-INFORMATION; MW Johnson Construction, Inc. 17645 Juniper Path Suite 100 Lakeville, MN 55044 COMPLIANCE: PA5SES Required UA = 579 Your Home = 440 24.0% Better Than Code Permit # Checked by/Date Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Valu2 U-Value ----------------- U21 --------- -------------------------- - ---------------- CEILINGS 3072 -------- 44.0 0.0 83 CEILINGS: Raised Truss 624 38.0 0.0 16 WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 1440 19.0 2.0 81 WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 1280 19.0 2.0 72 SSMT: Conc. 4.0' ht/4.0' by/4.0' insul 152 10.0 0.0 10 S5MT: Conc. 8.0' ht/8.0' bg/8.0' insul 976 10.0 0.0 56 GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above Grade 227 0.480 109 DOORS 38 0.350 13 HVAC EQUIPMENT: Furnace, 90.0 AFUE - -------- ----------- ------ --------- ---------------------------------- -------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building desiqn described here is consistent with the building plans, specific ations, and other calculations submitted with the permi application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the r ir. of the Min nesota E nergy Code. l r??•O? ? Date v Builder/Designer luh Silg Addrays: ? 11c1V?r. r ALTrxttvATr roxt oNr s: rrWo r.&n!r.xYaY :nWrLLnvGs InsrnuUr: 1YnNB: 'Phly ullurunllvu muy ba ouad fnr mm- anA bvo-fwnlly dwellings bulll to meet Ilie Culcgury 1 reqidremcuis o( NIlnnasaiu u„iso, r_i,,,pior 7470. Complam Parls A. p, and C. Cleorly mu@ plone wllht Imulollon A•vnlimai wlnAow unA jikyllHlu U- vuluaat gIxa unJ typu of nqulpmeNi aqulpmanl cantrolq •nd looollon of vopar raorJar &nJ wlnJwoih benlan. tilotu dmnllaJ Inlbruwtlnn au'l hu Aowd In Ntr A//nnwoin 6810ryy Codi summary dwsu avallahb hnm Nu Mlanemla p*ponmmt ol' Commarou. :r'ny-1: ?+?. .1f31U:CLb7N'C r rimcl: prapoIed envaln e olu Seulln o Ilon 3•? ?? ? PrmcrRve cuu k n ' ' "'?• -- •.. n 1 1 a r P 8. Yai 'eU, ele. L7 p dannmca (lafi pet ?670.01 T0 whp. l.C.? I! ; . ?: l:i:: : •i.:::;A:?i.. Chuek ihuqn-I rnafpY edoulullun apllon uud i• q"Cool;4ook'' (eomplala wn??i?heal La?ow ? • . L . : ?.. : ?? ? •' ? ?+rn?LaeL• ?nadioJ (uilocb rvporQ ? PalfotlNaPe1 0unab U.vdu11odaul¦tlons1 q 9YsUmd Analyda metltod (auacb 01101Ydl) "CooIcl)nnlc" 'VYoti•lcslicet ' ,t•::?.1:?s?.v.?tS?.. nO,.?.._. _ neprnnEn?e s INi7PI1CT1oNl itap L Clwck Ilam(a) tllul Jnalgn maau on Allnlnunn R+qidrruioui Ibt lo Ibe rlplu. blmt mem ull liems iu use "Cookbaak"opllon. clvp :. hidlcma propnsed wull lyps on IuLla Lulmv. lup J. InJlcula W6u1ow 1-1•va6ia onJ ioarea. lup .1. Vef11y fntul wlndow (InedWing araa of oll fonndatlon wlndows) uad Jonr oreu Is nquol or leig dion nllownUle parcenuga ".:. A L1L FA If TERbII 1 7 ux mum Alluwaiiia nm g pw ?n oor m 9! +lp y a?: Parcenmaaofl3xnoiaJ Wnll =, ????! "? ?•? '?'??•-4: 7k Si?t3? ??yJ? Mlnlmum R-44 wllh law inus Leal; or I ur lBSL - - - . ?n.mm?en. v Ia-a ?01a101n i' 0.6D v ? ?? . ? - -- ' • , °.• ? .. . .u.sa p.y] ? . t . ,? .7 . .] , . WLulnw U-vu?uoi • • ? ?? !? "3: •. on? aa • I.i _ ?e .?' ? . •, ?; ? 4INNL'S07'A ENERG V CODE-- WHlCHh'ULES 1V1AYJ USE ? iWnrJai.uuu.uIniII :. 1: ?-. . .j.•n ":r:APPLTC.Ch.iL eyl-mld7•fumllyUwsllbiQ? .7 Chop?er7671?;or mlly'?Idw_inliomoi du lexea •:Ir" •?Clu I?r7A70!'C?la o''1"??Ilhilolulo ? de jplar7474jiesiurliallon'andvenlilminnrc alronams :y??Iv?ilup?; •?,, .?.•'?..? ??. .a ,•i{•r. 1;:•:1., ;; •` . ?vnhou?aaondroWhouta?'• ChePIer3670w11inllliei"Cifagaryl or?'CUOgory'2'••'rovliloni xS 613 u ur ai . ••• -`Z?p1ar i, ar, r . nlnm?ora ur?nmmt '?'' ?' ?. !:'C6sPIar9670.whheldu?°L+ila1?ary1"'or?"CneeoryurovIiloni ' p owr olor esit p-ll-?• ? ? hopi?ri?676 . r condosoru odnwNs Jl. ?• • li:..r?.s :...:}^'?.?? '}I?: : ?.flll?lit' • ??y? ? . . • • , Part& plJ.r.RrSSuRIzAxxorr rRoxE, cTxorr l:huclc opdnil usad: cf?rurl Duudng erydpmenl (complala scheAiilex 6etow) q No ftml Lurning eqiilpment IrisrnucnoNS , Si?p I. Cnmplulu ?hn CuinGiuiloof Eqiiipmmjt Scher6rfa Below, Only eqnfpment tvlih a Y(Yaa) may he aelaetnd nndar tho "Culegory 1" aliemelo. Stcp'-• Cnmplnln Exhnurf/dlake•up d!r SchLdule on tlm right If dlrect or pnwer vanted or solld fltel umospherlc vent epace 6ooling equipment Is selecleJ. . .,,?. .. .,• .. cohrnusTroNt?Qurrn-r? ?r.scman .'?:'.•.:.;•:':•:?:.ti%?'1`,;•' •t'':..''•??;.ir.?aliaok?ll e? r`o'bidd)?'i?:'r Spncalieut6iu-u4psn11dD?rl Scaladcom?uNlan Y.' 11'anrt6?.<uoqd ?' . •". :.:!.?f. ?Iraclor oworvanloJ ;y+ i•?;1?•;;:;?•'• ?'? "''.' • e•f:. ? ,?. min?pl?o aailyvenfa N '?i'?7l,v,ti}1?:71?r4. IVDIL'f ?1CO1?111I ? unn?nll.I A.- ' !l n _ _ . • • . __ _ . ? ? ? •• t+ u?recror owervei ? . ' r . -,----- _ , .•• ?..•' •, •' ? • ?•'•'i??'r o?r ?. Alma? ?ec a?it v? . f .mm?pll!r eu y Vrul? o . u ?u?( ?T° Bq : Ilo?v la•rc4ul?ad faro?cL in'it li4ldiiul •oxhymi'Jat?ry ??o v rartO. 'V.r,,1V'C.TY.,ATxO1V' n l?'° ...?,:.,•,lni{:^''' •• , r..r?:••, ?_ ?,. Zf") '•enAla /Aa?•tii?'` .NA volnmu ale wndipV•.I'A`) ? i, . ?:Luck?me?had(a)'?i'rupo?eil b.s {C ran deacrlClfn^ or Incuf(nu ?3 . VRTITII.A'I'IffN ' j??j n A9 171Ea1CiNRn •? . iii ?b 9?ulawuul nf CmWIpIIunani Tha propowd bnllJlnp apaoll 41fon?. ond n?her lenlulnns tu4mltlaJwidi rwpI r wunty of ?hn b1(nn eo?u Gnur y CoA Ap? cnn? ?priw u?u) ? Sinn ll'll: C? .:xnnnar nnvicca ovor ]{IO cfin rlnw cfi cfi cfk YJLE • ? ? ? l d R?al ?: ? Q Soulad combiudo n ?t?;.??';? Dlroctur ownrvanlad • •.?:.•?•.•: Atroa? ha ll e 1 ? p ... co YVad il TI ?o1W fliel,a Q Alnmsalmdcoll?j - ?.. •U I?r1 flleb Q Almo? ?6adca1l vonlad ?? e » .p •. ?? ??r oo vunl?i ? T? W ni! [tl& • ? t.a m. ..up ? r lo mum ? mf u(e ? tilii ?}I n o- .1: , jli°'"'?:•P•'?• i• ? ? ? o ? , , r..•?'(?+r?'?,"tte'. ? . 2kt y.1 •} n.. y i w ? I 4? 1 e6n ?. , .. • Ic.) • ':.TOTALS /GO cfiii /n uieis douurnoeH H eamtuenl wldt Ilu Luqdlnp plum rn. 1110 prop04ed 6ulWing ilaa haon Jaslpnnd ?n mte, ih, ----- Data TYIC?II141W IIIIIIIIIUf -?• •..?.i ? J..R.?Jt1„?„?,V1,V (Su6mlt Tart CI npon cniliplallml ofsyyleo, vnrl- p?- ????t? JC------------^------ "--------- -'-°--^----^----- fnb Sl?e AJJra??i -- ---^-- ra....?-"'r....__ PartnltNumb¢r '' I mlnco 1 afln .1 OOu I t ven?uu?lan rulaplutf ba maasiirre au verlReif wLen tlie pe omune n t a Y????' °fi° a&+i af nlof? h? Ilie 6niWfn coed111oneJ invdo"I' hB?rl •i,.??Q yPq y?Ua n leu of I io p?a?nr pl ye opt on for Iho seolini ?=??mpHnncu Sluicmnidt Inamlled vandlnUnn ayamm Is In campllance wlih MN +nergy Code and Is.ilznd tn provlda 16e daslltn ufr Ilnw. Applicnnl (prinl nnwu) s?unau??n n4?` a '- . 7'ekphnuc num6er LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION . PROPERTYLEGAL: L6 7 S ; 4? L t?lo?k l l) c?s?t e? ?na ?' DATE OF SURVEY: 3-15- r`J-- ? LATEST REVISION: rn c m t v DOCUMENT STANDARDS a O z 9 ¢ / 9 0 ? • Registered Land Surveyor signature and company Z/? [?' ? ? ? • Buibing PertnitApplicant l • Legal description ik o ? • Address ? ? • North arcow and scale v/? ? • House type (rambler, walkout, split w/o spik entry bokout etc ) ? p ? • , , , . Di2ctional drainage anows wdh slopelgradient % ? ? • Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation ?o L;/ ? ? ? • Street name R/ ? ? • Driveway • Lot Square Footage V ? / ? • Lot Coverage ci ? ? • Benchmark ELEVATIONS Existina G??[7 ? • Sewer service (or Proposed) Q? n ? • Property comers vo ? • Top of curb at the driveway and property line eMensions ?[9// ? • Elevations of any existing adjacent homes ??"/ ? • Adequate footing depth of stmctures due to adjacent utility trenches ? C? ? • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.) ? Prooosed 4Y? 0 ? • Garage Noor V ? • Firstfloor ? • Lowest exposed elevation (walkouVwindow) ?/ ? • Property corners R' ?? ? • Front and rear of home at the foundation PONDING AREA ('rfaoolicable) ? 21?o • Easement line ? ?? • NWL ? Y?? • HWL n ?'9??[7 • Pond # desgnation ? ??? ? • Emergency Overtlow Elevation / DIMENSIONS 4?/? ? • Lot lines/Bearings 8 dimensions Q/?? • Right-of-way and sVeet width (to back of cur6) e" ?? • Proposed home dimensions including any praposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc. / (i.e. all sVuctu2s requiring pertnanent footings) B?/O ? • Show all easements of recorcl and any City ufilities within those easements aa? }7 ? • Setbacks of proposed structure and sideyard setback of adjacent existing structures c? ?? • Retaining wall requirements, if any Reviewed: Name 3?2?-d2 / Date ?.v ?N F d ? t7 ?• ?'---•--- rqo .?J ? ? . r " \?• / ? b? ^V ? cqR AOF eso., PflAR I O I{ECD pROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 06% T Rpp Wy? O?y.E,O 5 S •. J3 . 0?t : . ' ? DOO . $ y ' ?-"'?-????a? _ ? N :-, •_.?z, E ?.? ? EW? ? s80 ? o• 3:1 ialaxirnum or Retaining Wall UVNI Be Required LOT 5, 1529 DEERWOOD BEND PROPOSED;BASEMENT FL'OOR'ELEV:=879.7 WOODSTO PROPOSED'GARAGE FLOOR ECEV:=886.0 ' PROPOSED 70P OF BLOCK ELEV:=887:7 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR`ELEV:=879.7 LOT 6 1527 DEERWOOD BEND PROPOSED GARAGE' FCOOR ECEV.=887.4 PROPOSED TOP OF BGOCK ELEV.=887J TOWNHOM CI?TY OF EAGANLDAKOTA COUNTYNMINN SOTA.ES, J? NOTE: ALL HOUSE DIMENSIONS ARE TO N S OUTSIDE FOUNDATIOM e \'ps 35 B69x0 TNp" PAO s ° cqRqCF s .r> . Q0o .? a? aFC? a+3 (fl m ' . NLA \ AI;2? .? ?. X 9PiYf? a q r : .. BENCHMARK - TNH'WEST END STONEWOOD iANE = 888.36 I HEREBYCERTIFY -THAT-.THIS.SURVEYWAS.PREPARED-BY- MY DIRECT,SUPERVISION AND THAT-1'AM A:DUCY. REGISIT.ER SURVEYOR.UNDER THE"LAWS OF THE-SlATE OF MINNESOT7 - DATE..3-15-02 ' LEROY .H. CEN, LAND. SURVEY MINNESOTA> LICENSE N0. 10795 30' 'ELE ELEG NDTE PROPQtTY CARNERS NOT' SHOWN !O? BLE. 'TO:BE'SEf:,BY,, HEDLUA . . ,a LOT `5 AREA = 3750.SQ. FT. HSE AREA = 1889 SQ: FT. LOT 6 AREA = 3638 SQ. FL HSE AREA =:1889 SD. FT. SEWERSVCtOT5 =-875.9,(PER?PLAN) SEWER SVC LOT 6= 875.9 (PER PLAN) DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE; OOOXO DENOTES 'PROPOSED ELEVATION OOOXO ELVATION ? DENOTES' ) (SPIKE/NA o DENOTES $ERVICE LOCATION AR:UNDER . > LAND Bohlen.. . 5urveying &'Engineering ?.37462 Folioge Averwe - 4735 '123rd Slreet, W. N rlhfielq MN 55057 ste, 200 Svage.:MN 55378. R' ano,,: (sm) eas-nse B E Pnc?e: (esz) ess-eziz Fas: (507) 64577799Fax: (952) 895-9259 - Fu_ENnME: WOODSTONE/Iots5n6cert.S90 Siteaddress: /Sa7? 0,2-6-wo„c-? !?-.d Lot? aiock ! Subd. On April 15, 2000 the Minnesota Energy Code, Category I Building Requirements for insulation protection, air tightness, and ventilation, was adopted. As a result, the City of Eagan is requiring that the following information be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. _ This sVucture: is constructed to meet minimum requirements of the Mn Energy Code, Chapter 7670 OR _ This structure: will be conSUucted to meet more restric6ve requirements of Chapters 7672 or 7674 APPLIANCE GAS ELEC MANUFACTURER MODEL BTU'S VENTING TYPE Water Heater X A. D. 5.,.n yG,O0D Furnace X ?..-?e, 120? &o c?J wri Dryer A EXHAUST SYSTEM LOCATION TYPE MODEL CFM's VENTED YES No Kitchen A ki Bathroom 1 &oC.? ,517 x Bathroom2 5-0 ? Bathroom 3 8athroom 4 Other FIREPLACE 5 LOGATION GAS WOOD MANUFACTURER MODEL BTU'S veNrwc DiREC7 ATMOS ? LL 7C ec! fJ G?a MAKE-UP AIR MODEL TYPE CFM`s 6,24-. 6,0d: C HR J ,2 0 a H ?23 c. I hereby acknowledge that the above information is correct and agree to comply with the Minnesota Energy Code and City of Eagan requirements. Lt?- Signature nv Jda s? CompanyName IP/ta 103 Date This form is the responsibility of the General ConUaetor. JobAddress jSa'1 pw_r ?,,4 Heating Contractor Controlled Air Name of Tester C? Date Percent 02 ? Percent COZ ? Percent CO 0 Stack Temp. I Aaron Perkins 411 qty of Eau 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 A4-1-11; P.T3 651-493-0706 p.1 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use (��J Permit*: `a Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: 2012 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 6 12 - RESIDENT 2 - RESIDENT OWNER Site Address: 1s 2 15 2/ VP€nf WOodend Unit#: J IName: Phone: 6 Address f City 1 Zip: Applicant is: Owner %< Contractor TYPE OF WORK Description of work: Tear'— v ff an to Re- Roo4 1 s Construction Cost: �b7� au (L./714.00 Multi -Family Building: (Yes f No ) r (� e Company: Wotnderfes' Home eai(de.irf Contact: Awrov. Per Kills ye trivooq 0136 Lada Late CONTRACTOR 1 Address: /►,( State: (" 1 N Zip: ..SS -0 i g r : p l License #: PC 63 I) 83 Lead Certificate #: NAT -11.533 -1 City: Ci dsc,e Pin es Phone: 7? -2'-1s- 3373 If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING I In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? { _Yes No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: s i Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.00pherstateonecall.oro 1 hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180 days of permit issuance. xcat lr`O ►% frkri x Appli ant's Printed Name Applicants Signature Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I For Office Use I Permit City of EaRdft Permit Fee: 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: Phone: (651) 675-5675 I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 I Staff: I I 2013 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: Site Address: Unit Name: ~ )fl C/ L Phone: Resident/ Owner Address / City / Zip: L~~ ~~~~~~~i 1 Z'd S` /Z~Z Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: & 4 L Construction Cost: Multi-Family Building: (Yes / No ) Company: `Ci '7~C 9l "'Z4 a"6' ontact: I -If Contractor Address: 6/9CS6yrc, e~n City: (V1y f State:/ Zip: Phone: Ccl ~S License M Lead Certificate If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information maybe classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180 days of per it issuance. X_ x Appl' ant's Printed Name ,4ppYica s i J;ure Page 1 of 3