Loading...
1414 East Pond RdRESIDENTIAL (t1P `t as o . izo ?l BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN PP t_}c?'b?- ° j R ,830 PILOT KNOB RD - 551 /UU,fII t? ?6r551.681-467 NewConslrucUon Rea remeMS ,4;F JE T T, _ Ra eIIR airR ui n • 3 registered site surveys shoving sq. ft of lot sq. It. of house; ancu rooted areas • 2 copies of plan (20% maximum lot coverage albwed) Iset of Energycalulationsforheatedadd' ons • 2 copies of plan shaving beam & window sines: poured bond design, sic) f/ I) ?V • 1 she survey for exterior additions & decks • 1 set of Energy Preservation Indicated home served by septic system • 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan ti bl platted after 711193 Iola ? t • Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (bldgs with 3 or lass units) DATE Q"if = & Z6I JOB SITE ADDRESL16A .9 IF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING, HOW MANY UNITS? PROPERTY OWNER OG VALUaIO ,r7!V 71. 3 R) TYPE OF WORK` NEW 14ossn&- FIREPLACE(S) _ 0 _ 1 X2 APPLICANT ,tkff leo. WC. PHONE# ADDRESS lg=f( /446& Oe 1?44e L AA Ali[ ZIPCODE S r7/4 PAGER # CELL PHONE #,'to3 - X86. 3 6.5_ FAX # 7 - NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ONLY- FILL OUT COMPLETELY Energy Code Category MINNESOTA RULES 7670 CATEGORY 1 (check one) - Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet Subrrirtted - Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted ©C'? 2001 MINNESOTA RULES 7672 New Energy Code orksheet Submitted _ ?6 7a3 ,? c mss-3° Plumbing Contractor. aSruw Phone #: 7 6 3- 7 53 -? 3 65 Plumbing System Includes: 1 Water Softener Y% Lawn Sprinkler Fee: $90.00 3 Water Heater _ No. of R.I. Baths -7 No. of Baths Mechanical Contractor. V A,n/YklA, ALAI Phone # Mechanical System Includes: Air Conditioning LA-3 qj a5` Heat Recovery System (? ,I??_*z Sewer/Water Contractor- e-trU : ' :? '?" Phone 0 -5 All above information must be submitted prior to processing of application. q/ Fee: $70.00 SS 313 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the info ation is correct, and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan ON, ices. Signature of Appllcont 'X C/ Certificates of Survey Received 96- Tree Preservation Plan Received 0 Not Required . ' -. V Updated 1101 0 ? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex ,?r- 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 03 01 of _ piex ? 09 07-plex ? 04 02-plex ? 10 08-plex ? 05 03-plex ? 11 10-piex ? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex 31 New ? 35 ? 32 Addition ? 36 ? 33 Alteration ? 37 ? 34 Replacement Valuation 55 // 4/h vivo Census Code TEE SAC Units Nbr, of Units Nbr. of Bldgs Type of Const J[ i OFFICE USE ONLY0 ? 13 16-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 17 Garage ? 18 Deck ? 19 Lower Level Plbg_Y or _ N ? 20 Pool ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 22 Porch/Addn.(4-sea.) ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 24 Storm Damage ? 25 Miscellaneous ? 30 Accessory Sldg ? 31 Ext. Alt-,Multi - -• ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF ? 36 Multi Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair Demolish (Bldgp' ? 43 Reroof ? 46 Windows/Doors 'Demolition (Entire Bldg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant Occupancy K 3-14t MC/ES System Zoning &L City Water Stories Q Booster Pump Sq. Ft. pp F PRV Length toB Fire Sprinklered Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (new bldg) Final/C.O. _ Footings (deck) _ Final/No C.O. _ Footings (addition) _ Plumbing Foundation _ HVAC Drain Tile Roof Ice & Water Final Other _ _ Framing _ Air/Gas Tests _ Final Figs Pool Fireplace % R.I. _yAir Test _ _ _ Final C1) _ Siding _ Stucco _ Stone X Insulation J _ Windows (new/replacement) Approved By 1 -- Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC City SAC Water Supply & Storage S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit License Search Copies Other Total 7 3 r> rL- 03 X1 Building Inspector 9<"r? y l Address 14 14 East: Pond Rd Zip 5512 2 Lot Blk Sub Kingswood Ponds Ist THESE ITEMS WERE / WERE NOT COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. Date: 46 • Q Yes No Inspector: Al'ke- ,!?le- Final grade (6" from siding) Permanent steps (garage) Permanent steps (main entry) Permanent driveway i/ Permanent gas Sod/Seeded grass ? Trail/curb damage Porch 1/ Basement finisb Deck Please verify with the builder the removal of roof test caps from the plumbing system and the shutoff of water supply to the outside lawn faucet before freeze potential exists. Contact engineering division at 681-4645 before working in right-of-way or installing underground sprinkler system. White - City Copy Yellow - Resident Copy Pink - Contractor Copy 763 496 7045 'Apr 24 02 10:20a Mary Hage 763-498-7045 pftin`7 yea/ FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET 0 Hage & Co. Inc. Dam: ql'z 10218 Hage Dr. Project. 9,fry- xlA1L Rogers, Mn 55374-9787 Office: 763-498-7611 Company: Fax: 763-498-7045 Submitted by: Ken or Mary Total pages including cover sheet: ,- Please notify us immediately at (763)498-7611 if enclosures are not as noted. P. 1 ??4 /i S' C 121ll,?A44 Rpr 24 02 10:20a Mary Hage 763-49e-7045 p.2 ?I i . nignway oa Isanti, Minnesota 55040 Phone: 763-444-47.74 * Tax: 763-444-k)5<)5 Engineered Roof and Floor Truss Systems FAX COVER SHEET TO: X>~..v Fok i J4,,,., Ac 5 j No. of pages in transmission: t7 Time sent: Lo:oV i j Sent by, Cati4 Date: 9"Z3 -aZ MESSAGE: FAX NO: 763-4 le IbLfr L?. ,fir, IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSMISSION OF THI PLEASE CALL' l 'd 98Z6 'ON SSnSi IN 0NV d IN7l 1 :6 100Z Xb dv Apr 24 02 10:20a Mary Hage 763-498-7045 p.3 I c 'J ou0 1 all i i i r I I 5 i STANDARD REPAIR DETAIL TO CUT OUT SECTION OF TOP CHORD SEARING TRUSS 1?. THIS 8 A INICWC KFAM DEfAK TO K k"D CMV FOR I6 0R qj"I MIEM - JMMOAAAaMG MOW" OF TW!IRLM 0 VmDAA.AOFD. "M aaRE n INATMORMIMMOMPAMAROOMMREO. NIRNTNRRfC'WRMWAMAI WU "R A11e Of surrmTRM RR: LOADS MOICAMO LAUAMEWOMMUR RSRRTNIMTDTOMMQRRSRIALFCUTXR4SNORRAI OUNNO AMCAMOOF RE?AIR. 1 LUMWR MUST SECUT CLRANLY AND ACCMAT&Y MD THE RA.IAMOTC Illf lIMSASPAIRaTDR1USED foil sas"PLYTRI,$MYADI LWO SLOADRIC S. CUITMO 8 RAAdm WOM I& OF CONNT!C a FLATEL AND AMDTMOf REM TO WOIVOUAL IRUSS OESIGN I fOq PLATE 7S'SES AND IL/MSER GRADES j CONNECfOR KATES MUST !E ILALY -weeDD D V.0UNDUTt" RD 753- ST-qM2 NTT:. C ealeMeld. MO. i 1 ! 1 4An1 I/T AMY •r eA. f I Iw 1 1 00 NOT CUT A -TI - .- ' - - RiT0OIM301lAL NZ MAX 32 114" MAX DATE I -ARRe1D •,,,,?y..w..? I •?+?a e,o bwe.s wlxw Md Li '• 4?.r. TwAwR A+o.w ? ti TlwRl• .waa+r a w. r,rMU. AORyI Z 'd 9816 'ON Fs Mrn RAfLY t ISO TD VMI" ,TNETNM "no Ri NACE ' VAMO. RSN ONLY. Y WAT. I i i Ra as a !M?.wwMwMA I MN R.F m #Aww M ?FAw.l? l ,O.W niM~Mw?Rww..w L/4Y?1 % ' ' HE W ONb d--- Vt l 6 - 01 d8V ZOOZ May 02 02 02:32p Mary Hage uo/U[/ZUU[ i1CZlj UUU4Z4Je!Z u A 1J W.T. (Mao) MCCONa, :E- am 75,/a Avenue NOM, arooklyn PsdL MN 55428 (763) 580-7446 April 50, 2002 Mr. John Prbyl John Bradley, Inc. 18467 Jeumark Road Fifty Lakes MN 56449 Dear Mr. PnbyL- JOHN FRIbYL Re: Hanscn Rcgdmce 1414 East Pond Road Fagan, Minnesota How a Co., Builders Bradley Job No. 01-152 WTM Job No. 1950. 763-498-7045 p.2 HAUL U1 This is to certify that I have reviewed the substitution of hollow core plank for a east in place slab over the storage vault and wine teller under the garage at the above residence. The plank supplied by Molio is bar more than adequate structurally for the span bmtvcd, 10 feet. There is a sligb t ittcrea9c in dead bad but it is ersig:riScaat. The test in place walls and footing are adequate to carry the bads. In my opinion, the above will be structurally adequate. Pkam feel free to call rue should you have any qwWm. very truly yours, w. T. McCalla, P. Eng. I hM6%OftjW 60"OM14 XPOOM AM6 W F y wa, Poe' y =W WAK M AY4c?axo41valoe ad *at] 4m 4 Qabt.lowwdA4afieaW EgPm o4dvakfee ?hds1?o,r,?dx? Sue dMioomta Rise- aey?aeatleo]Ve, 10340 shwaftow canam"Ot stages • srnxenar Comrwe • EAM" 7estmmny 12/07/2001 09:28 6514808348 DLO EXC.&POURED WALL DEC.-OTOI (FRI) 09:11 AM ENG TST ST PAUL TEL,6516591379 AMERICAN ENGINERI ENGINEERING TEsilNG, INC, ?p r,?a ?k,k cAlv,a•?rNe? • J?uN?r? ?C,?ont ?/??? Mro??+ C??iw.?.ritA.•r fem. ly?N f.?s+ Po.,m A* PrAt * , , MIJ PAGE 02 1 P. 002 t70N4017AN M . GECTECHI IICAI • MATEHAL.l . LrNVIRCNN ENT/d. V C-0%024 0 Lo QN nA'4 G, Zoo/, s'w* Ip4~v4wtl yO& So,&s I.,kPas,bA IN y)j* &xg#vA-'?/01v fir, rite. O td rb &C4k , $V& juOWftr?o 'rJp&. SoiLTO -Cal /tee SufrAML& Ta SuPP.0zp• -1rg& AI &L IW7 .19.040$, 400400ok'eri •,v Tiff 'roo&K*Ao l,v 14%4 Sr4+r4 ills, A44vot Mrs .• c1/C 04y' 'THA W C*- ia',vS *000 I rl.r{. via rie•wS ?rl..s J&4 #4 FoRMAti. itaNove wl K ISIS fter p.4 jot„ y g+yf, &4j0.OS. C44L Ado IWr LS/-659- /:31/ skol This dOQumanf sMn nbF bs mprpd md, ixwM in tun, urirhouf wdlfsn 9pyrw®1 o/AmeehEn En44asslAfg T>t6tMq, Hn 550 ClawlfiAd AV Mere NOdh. St Paul, IWN 53114. A61-668 1. Far 651.00.1379 Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Re?h4atar. Wausau. Rapid City. Pietro AN ApFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EWAL oppoF I MTY EMPLDYER ' LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION • / PROPERTYLEGAL: L?1 5 glcoK KI,da 41 DATE OF SURVEY: LATEST REVISION: m c Q< U DOCUMENT STANDARDS ¢ a 0 z O ¢ / GY// ? ? • Registered Land Surveyor signature and company 19 ? ? • Building Permit Applicant ? ? Legaldescription ? ? • Address ? North arrow and scale tv ? ? • House type (rambler, walkout, split w/o, split entry, lookout, etc.) ? ? • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient % ? ? Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation GV// ? N ? Street name ? ? • Driveway I ? ? • Lot Square Footage L?/ ? ? • Lot Coverage 3 ? ? Benchmark /o - <2 S_ 1* / ELEVATIONS Existing 2/0 11 * Sewer service (or Proposed) 0/0 ? ? • Property corners T 0/ ? • op of curb at the driveway and property line extensions / Y ? ? ? ? . Elevations of any existing adjacent homes t / • Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches 2 0 ? • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.) Proposed ? ? • Garage floor C]? ? ? • First floor r/ ? ? • Lowest exposed elevation (walkouttwindow) 2/0 ? • Property comers C? ? ? . Front and rear of home at the foundation PONDING AREA (if applicable) 0/0 ? • Easement line Cl r? . NWL f3 ? ? • HWL ?/? ? • Pond # designation r? ? ? • Emergency Overflow Elevation DIMENSIONS fJ'// ? ? . Lot IinesBeadngs & dimensions ra/ ? ? • Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb) ?? ? ? • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc. (i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings) Ca'?? ? • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements CB/? ? • Setbacks of proposed structure and sideyard setback of adjacent existing structures ? ? • Retaining wall requirements, if any Reviewed: HAGE & CO., INC. 10218 Hage Drive ROGERS, MN 55374 (763) 498-7611 01 h0415Ld Lt- o/t- 5 6Z 2 gf/rv65 wooo PMa P5 fA?,_ AJV M i/ ss i.2/ at ao_ty one w?'fi ations An comers framed so insulation can be installed after 0e0". AN partion walls to be framed so insulation can be installed after sheathing. All exterior openings to be caulked. All sill plates to have sealer. and plate lines. 6 mill vapor barrier on warm side of building seal all seams, openings All sheathing joints not supported by framing to be caulked. J. Boxes or solid blocking required for siding to complete seal of weather protection and air barrier. 1nsLtation: joint-smooth cgs. to be Attic access to be sealed with caulk or unbroken sprayed ceiling 1 weather stripped. Window minimum "U" value .29 csmts .31sfiders. Exterior door minimum 'U" value .38. Sealed electrical boxes in exterior walls. tiance srf?atiQII: (Path Category One) Fumace 90°x6 high efficiency-sealed. Water heater and fireplaces to be direct vent. Clothes Dryer_cfm / ventilation req'd_cfm / people vent_drn suppfemental____cfm / beth{ans-=e4m-hro= Maximum cfm on any one appliance - 300 c.f.m. lbl blj 2601 b9:Jb Eik364249?12 JOHN HRIBYL HAUL Ui MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Minnesota Energv Code MNcheck Software Version 3.0 COUNTY: Hennepin STATE: Minnesota ZONE: 2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family DATE: 10-1-2001 DATE OF PLANS: 08-01 TITLE: 01-152 PROJECT INFORMATION: Hansen residence COMPANY INFORMATION: Hasa 6 Co COMPLIANCE: PASSES I I 1 I I Permit N 1 1 I 1 Checked bv/Date I I 1 Required UA a 1050 Your Hoare = 851 18.9% Better Than Code Area or Cavitv Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value ---------- UA ------- --------------------------------------------- CEILINGS: Raised Truss 2303 ----------------- 44.0 0.0 51 WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 5126 19.0 2.5 277 WALLS: Wood Frame. 24" O.C. 690 0.0 7.5 85 BSMT: Conc. 8.0' ht/7.0' b418.0' insul 1140 10.0 0.0 72 GLAZING: Windows or Doors. Above Grade 1010 0.350 353 DOORS 37 0.350 13 HVAC EOUIPMENT: Furnace, 90.0 AME -------------------------- ------- -------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The orooosed building -- design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications. and other calculations submitted with the permit aoplication. The oroposed building has been designed to meet the requ ats of the Minnesota Energy Code. Builder/Designer \ 7 Date v, Oct 30 01 09:55p Mary Hage 763-498-7045 p.1 nr:et, tHLIMN ti'12+[.UPI UEV i 97634987845 No. 596 PW CERTIFICATION OF PUPWOSE OF SECONDARY IQTCHHEN FACH ITIF„S WITHIN SINGLE FAMM Y DWELLING duly sworn and under oath, certify that (Property Owners Name) 1. I am the flamer of the Otte-family detaebed dwelling-as defined in Section 11.03 of the Eagan City Code ?- -, _ _ _ - - -- - - -- - (Street-Addreast)_ and legally described as. swM ?. f7w./r. ? r 2. A building permit application has been submitted on my behalf to the City to enlarge, alter, improve, retttodel, and/or finish the above-referenced dwelling, or a portion thereof, to include the installation of facilities for a secondary kitchen within the dwelling. 3. The secondary kitchen facilities to be installed under the building permit are for the sole purpose of Providing cooking and food service facilities for private entertainment of guests by the property owner at the dwelling. 4. I acknowledge that the Eagan Zoning Code prohibits the existence of a second kitchen facility n a dwelling unit to serve a complete, independent and secondary living_ sekeeping use within withithe dwelling. I certify that the installation of the secondary kitchen faeilities der the build not for the Purpose of tug permit is providing a second complete, independent d sep dlor housekeeping unit within the dwelling. Rated: `)? .2001 ( ..,. _,.? Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2001. I hereby verify that the above said Certification of purpose of Secondary Kitchen Facilities Within Single Family ))welling was recorded at the County Reoorder'9 Office on 2001. LINDA MARIE DRALLE NOTARY PJ" -MM ESOTA By' My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005 Its: ?j 'PEAS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFrpp 13Y: City of raw Cammun.Y ft-dw mt Deettnnca 3170 Pila Knot Rob CWM9 tetPiFomwC"r'ftQM ofxitthm Creitida U4111/UL 11:40 'UOJ1 'oJ J4U1 UulUV unnrau.n • -mm Sbw fwl CONCRETE PRODUCTS COMPANY FACSIMILIE COVER SHEET Attn. k t ,.,. Co Name: C' . ?. T - Aw'.W ? G3 `f 9 8 7 0 ?F ?? Total pages, iadudMg cover ahaet /,64 atT # 1YYr'i,9-t 415 Lilac St Lino Lakes MN 55014 Ph: (651) 786-7722 Fax: (651) 786-0229 Draft: Fax: (651) 783-3401 14800-336.6546 F-marl: sabm@molin.c= E-nmg: dmfdug@mo&iL" httpJ/www.mohn cam Urgem _ Please Revieav Reply ASAP: For your Info: _ Pkeze Comment: RE: Cotes V From EWAA . Nohow Con Ph"k 0 IffmWed Waupomis . preaw Bemw a,d cohmms . Pars Saaolia 04/11/02 11:27 '$851 789 3401 49T gevvft Sinn. 1697 CONCRETE PRO l COMPANY 415 Lilac St,.M, L.rv L.k.x MN 55014 OI5c. 651-786•'n22 • FAX 651.786-0220 1-0063356546 Project Re 10002 Sheet No. Job No. By Date I I 1 i i 1 I { I c 1 I /(y 1 IA 1 r r r i r 3 "lz ??. i2tiyK; ?? ? OnJ IF3t ??'. w 4a 't 1 3 ' ;f3r? _ p^i Powr? i I w Yl S r 41 y 1 - I Fool 41 r 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I r i MOLIN DRAFTING OVER 100 YEARS OF CUSTOMER SERVICE Flexlcore Hoitcw re Plank • Precast Beams and Columns - Insulated Wall Panels • Stadia AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC# CONSULTANTS . GEOTECHNICAL . MATERIALS . ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OF EXCAVATION OBSERVATIONS AND DENSITY TESTING PROJECT: RESIDENCE 1414 EAST POND ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: HAGE & COMPANY, INC. 10218 HAGE DRIVE ROGERS, MN 55374 ATTN: KEN HAGE AET JOB NO.: 20-01932 DATE: APRIL 1, 2002 This report presents the results of the soil observations and testing we performed for the referenced project. Our services were conducted on a will-call basis. The scope of our work was limited to the following: • Observing the soils exposed in the majority of the mass excavation bottom for the residence. • Drilling shallow hand auger borings in the bottom of the observed excavation. • Performing hand cone penetrometer probes in the bottom of the excavation. • Evaluating the suitability of the exposed soils to support the anticipated fill and/or the building loadings. • Conducting compaction tests in fill placed to attain basement footing grade. • Summarizing the results of our services in a written report. This document shall not be reproduced, except in lull. without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North. St. Paul, MN 55114. 651-659-9001. Fax 651-659-1379 Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau. Rapid City. Pierre AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AET #20-01932 - Page 2 Our work on this project was authorized on December 5, 2001 by Don Oreskovich from DLO Excavating. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our observations, hand auger borings, hand cone penetrometer probes and our review of the available information, it is our judgment the soils exposed in the observed excavation bottom were suitable for support of the fill and/or the structural loadings. We observed the excavation for all but the garage area and the northeast part of the basement, which were not yet excavated at the time of our site visit. We were not requested to observe those parts of the mass excavation bottom. The results of the soil compaction tests taken in fill placed to attain basement footing grade indicate that all tests met or exceeded the minimum recommended compaction level at the elevations and locations tested. These conclusions are intended as a summary. Read the remainder of the report specific information. PROJECT INFORMATION We understand or assume that the residence under construction will: • Have one to two above-grade levels. • Have a full basement level with a floor elevation of 861.8. • Have an attached garage to the east with the floor at elevation 870.0. • Have bottom-of-footing elevations at minimum frost protection depth or lower. AET #20-01932 - Page 3 • Be supported by conventional spread footings designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure no greater than 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf). • Have normal tolerance to settlement • Be constructed according to applicable building code requirements. Deviations from the above design information could necessitate altering our conclusions and recommendations. Contact us if the information stated is differs from the actual project design. Building location and elevation information obtained at the site, and presented in this report, was referenced to construction location and grade staking set at the site by the contractor. BACKGROUND INFORMATION To our knowledge, a preliminary geotechnical exploration program has not been conducted in the area of the proposed residence. Because of this, we cannot comment on the soil conditions at depth. Our judgments reported herein are based only on those soils which were observed in the excavation and those probed by our shallow hand auger borings and hand cone penetrometer probes. To further explore the soil conditions, deeper penetration test borings are needed. EXCAVATION OBSERVATIONS We observed the excavation for the majority of the mass excavation for the residence on December 5, 2001. We were not present at the site on a full-time basis. Our services consisted of one visit to the site, coordinated with the contractor, which allowed us to observe the majority of the building area excavation. We did not observe the excavation for the garage and northeast part of the basement because they were not completed at the time of our site visit. In addition to observing the soils exposed in the observed excavation, we conducted shallow hand auger borings AET #20-01932 - Page 4 and hand cone penetrometer probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with ASTM:D2488. Estimates were made of their strength properties based on their resistance to advancement of the hand auger and from the hand cone penetrometer readings. The soils exposed in the base of the observed excavation were classified as naturally deposited silty sands (SM). The bottom of the excavation sloped from about elevation 861'2 on the east end down to about 854 on the west end. The observed soils were judged suitable for support of the fill and/or the 2,000 psf foundation loads. No standing water was observed in the bottom of the excavation. Since the excavation terminated below foundation grades, 1:1 oversizing of the excavation bottom and subsequent fill system was recommended. Our judgments of the excavation oversizing were based on the off-set staking and elevation information provided for us in the field by the contractor. Based on the information, it appeared that sufficient 1:1 lateral oversizing was provided. FILL COMPACTION TESTING On December 6, 2001, we conducted four (4) density tests in fill placed to attain basement footing grade. The density tests were conducted on a will-call basis. The field density tests were compared to the laboratory Standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM:D698) to arrive at a percent compaction level for each test. The test results, which are attached, indicate that all tests met or exceeded the recommended compaction level at the locations and elevations tested. AET #20-01932 - Page 5 CLOSURE The following sheets are attached and constitute an integral part of this report. Reference should be made to these sheets for pertinent information regarding our services on this report. Report of Density Tests. Earthwork Quality Control Information. Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction. To protect the client, the public and American Engineering Testing, Inc., this report (and all supporting information) is provided for the addressee's own use. No representations are made to parties other than the addressee. Our services for this project have been conducted to those standards considered normal for services of this type at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, either express or implied, is intended. Report Prepared By: Report Reviewed By: Jam D. Miller Michael P. McCarthy, PE Senior Engineering Assistant Principal Engineer MN Reg. #16688 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTINGI ING CONSULTANTS • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OF DENSITY TESTS PROJECT: RESIDENCE 1414 EAST POND ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: HAGE & COMPANY, INC. 10218 HAGE DRIVE ROGERS, MN 55374 ATTN: KEN HAGE AET JOB NO: 20-01932 DATE: MARCH 27, 2002 FIELD DENSITY TEST DATA Proctor values are adjusted for variable gravel content, therefore, the values shown on the Proctor list are not necessarily the values used in calculating the percent compaction. Dry Moist. (%) Test Test Density Content Oversize Proctor Percent No. Date Test Location Elevation (ncfl (%) Material No. Compaction Specs. 1 12/6/01 8'S & 4'E of NW building 857th 111 6.5 3 1 99 95 corner 2 12/6/01 12'S & 12'E of NW building 8551/2 111th 6.9 3 1 99th 95 corner 3 1216101 5'S & 7'E of NW building 855th 110 6.3 3 1 98 95 comer 4 12/6/01 22'S & 5'E of NW building 8571/2 1131h 5.1 3 1 101 95 comer Method: Sand Cone (ASTM D1556) _ Nuclear (ASTM D2922) X This document shall not he reproduced, except in full, without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North. St. Paul, MN 55114. 651-659-9001. Fax 651-659-1379 Duluth. Mankato. Marshall. Rochester. Wausau. Rapid City. Pierre AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AET #20-01932 Page 2 LABORATORY MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS (PROCTOR) Gravel Test Opt. Moisture Max. Dry No. Soil Description Content (%) Method Content (%) Densitv (pcfl Sand, fine to medium grained, brown (SP) A 13.5 111.5 Procedure & Method: Standard (ASTM D698) X Modified (ASTM D1557) _ To protect the addressee, the public, and ourselves, this report (and all supporting information) is provided for the addressee's own use. No representations are made to parties other than the addressee. Revie d By James D. Miller EARTHWORIK QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION EXCAVATION BASE EVALUATION Judgments of supporting soils are based on soils exposed, and on local samples of soils retrieved by hand angering and probing. Because conditions in the subsurface are hidden, it is not possible to fully characterize the subsurface conditions. Therefore, the client must accept that our judgments are limited to those soils which are directly observable to us. As soil conditions may be variable at depth, it is best that excavation base observation be aided by deeper exploratory test borings (usually done prior to construction). Although these deeper borings may not totally reveal what is in the subsurface, they greatly reduce the risk of deeper poor soils going undetected. The presence of ground water within the excavation can also limit the supporting soil evaluation process. Also, if standing ground water is present, there is a risk to the client that compressible soils may not be observed and remain beneath the water during excavation. The compressible materials can become trapped beneath or within the subsequently placed fill. FILLING Structural fill placement is commonly monitored by performing local compaction tests, which entails comparing a field density test to a laboratory Proctor test to arrive at a percent compaction. Density tests of fill only provide the compaction level of the fill at the location and elevation of the test. As many factors control compaction, such as fill lift thickness, moisture content, material type and coamactive effort, compaction variation within fill can exist which may not be represented by the tests. Density (compaction) tests are considered representative when used in a conscientious program of controlled fill placement, where the factors influencing compaction are closely monitored. Conclusions about fill suitability to support structural loadings from the results of a limited number of compaction tests includes increased risk, unless the individual drawing the conclusions has complete knowledge of the afore-mentioned variables during placement. For this reason, part-time testing on a "trip" basis includes more risk to the client than "frill-time" monitoring/testing. OVERSIZING Structural elements also exert loadings laterally; and because of this, the excavation and subsequent fill system needs to be oversized to accommodate these loadings. The extent of lateral oversizing is normally associated with the movement 'sensitivity of the strucnue and the strength/compressibility, properties of the soils remaining along the excavation sidewalls. Oversizing on the order of 1 (horizontal):1 (vertical) is typically provided for foundations in "normal" conditions. However, oveisizing on the order of 1'h:1 or more is usually needed in highly compressible situations such as swamp deposits. AET does not practice in the field of surveying and mast rely on location and elevation staking of proposed construction by the client or their representative. Our measurements in the field are made in relation to those stakes or other location and elevation information provided to us. The reliability of AET's opinions, conclusions and recommendations based on those measurements is dependent on the accuracy of the staking or information provided by the client or their representative. FREEZING WEATHER Soils which are allowed to freeze will heave and lose density. Upon thawing, these soils will not regain their full original strength and density. The extent of heave and density/strength loss depends on the soil type and moisture condition; and is usually more pronounced in finer grained soils, and particularly silty soils. Foundations, slabs, and other improvements affected by such frost movements should be protected from frost intrusion during freezing weather. If filling takes place during freezing weather, all frozen soils, snow and ice should be stripped from all areas to be filled prior to new fill placement; and the new full should not be allowed to freeze during or after placement. For this reason, it is usually more beneficial to perform excavate/refill operations during freezing weather in smaller plan areas where grade can be attained quickly rather than working larger areas where a large amount of frost stripping may be needed. STRUCTURAL SUPPORT ON UNCONTROLLED FILL Risks are associated with supporting structures on fill which has not been placed in a controlled and well documented manner. Even where existing fill appears to be well compacted (including when soil borings have been performed), hidden poorer or looser soils can potentially exist below or within the fill; or previous excavation and extension of the compacted full may not have been provided with sufficient oversize in all directions to accommodate the new lateral loadings. Risks can be reduced by means of increasing the amount of testing and observations. 20-E.FI.D013(2/Ol) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. FREEZING WEATHER E + CTS ORt EUMDING CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Because water expands upon freezing and soils contain water, soils which are allowed to freeze will heave and lose density. Upon thawing, these soils will not regain their original strength and density. The extent of heave and density/ strength loss depends on the soil type and moisture condition. Heave is greater in soils withhigher percentages of fines (silts/clays). High silt content soils are most susceptible, due to their high capillary rise potential which can create ice lenses. Fine grained soils generally heave about 114" to 3/9 for each foot of frost penetration. This can translate to 1 " to 2" of total frost heave. This total amount can be significantly greater if ice lensing occurs. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Clayey and silty soils can be used as perimeter backfill, although the effect of their poor drainage and frost properties should be considered. Basement areas will have special drainage and lateral load requirements which are not discussed here. Frost heave may be critical in doorway areas. Stoops or sidewalks adjacent to doorways could be designed as structural slabs supported on frost footings with void spaces below. With this design, movements may then occur between the structural slab and the adjacent on-grade slabs. Non-frost susceptible sands (with less than 12% passing a #200 sieve) can be used below such areas. Depending on the function of surrounding areas, the sand layer may need a thickness transition away from the area where movement is critical. With sand placement over slower draining soils, subsurface drainage would be needed for the sand layer. High density extruded insulation could be used within the sand to reduce frost penetration, thereby reducing the sand thickness needed. We caution that insulation placed near the surface can increase the potential for ice glazing of the surface. The possible effects of adfreezing should be considered if clayey or silty soils are used as bacldill. Adfreezing occurs when backfill adheres to rough surfaced foundation walls and lifts the wall as it freezes and heaves. This occurrence is most common with masonry block walls, unheated or poorly heated building situations and clay backfill. The potential is also increased where backfill soils are poorly compacted and become saturated. The risk of adfreezing can be decreased by placing a low friction separating layer between the wall and backfill. Adfreezing can occur on exterior piers (such as deck, fence or other similar pier footings), even if a smooth surface is provided. This is more likely in poor drainage situations where soils become saturated. Additional footing embedment and/or widened footings below the frost zones (which includes tensile reinforcement) can be used to resist uplift forces. Specific designs would require individual analysis. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Foundations, slabs and other improvements which may be affected by frost movements should be insulated from frost penetration during freezing weather. If filling takes place during freezing weather, all frozen soils, snow and ice sho 's b stripped from areas to be filled prior to new tt placement. The new fill should not be allowed w freeze during transit, placement or compaction. This should be considered in the project scheduling, budgeting and quantity estimating. It is usually beneficial to perform cold weather earthwork operations in small areas where grade can be attained quickly rather than working larger areas where a greater amount of frost stripping may be needed. If slab subgrade. areas freeze, we recommend the subgrade be thawed prior to floor slab placement. The frost action may also require reworking and recompaction of the thawed subgrade. OIREPOli(2/Ol) AMMUCAN ENGPgEMMgG TESTING, INC. 05/03/02 14:22 FAR 651 786 0229 MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2002 ----------------- -- Since 1997 CONCRETE PRODUCTS COMPANY May 3, 2002 Re: Precast installation on the Hanson residence, 1414 East Pond Road, Eagan, MN To Whom It May Concern; The hollow core plank, on the above mentioned residence, was installed with rebar drilled into the poured walls at four feet on center. The detail on the next page illustrates what we famished. and installed. We take full responsibility for installations. Please call if you require further information. Sincerely, John E. Saccoman, V.P. Marketing & Sales Dir. OUR MISSION IS "BUILDING" CUSTOMER SATISFACTION THROUGH GENERATIONS OF TEAMWORK Rexkore Hollowacore Plank " Wallpanels • Beams and Columns " Misc. Precast 415 Lilac Street- Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 •Olfice 651-766-7722 • FAX 651-796.0229 • 1-800-336-6546 " EOE/AA MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS _ R 003 05/03/02 14:22 FAX 651 786 0229 HOLLOW CORE Z" 32 BRNG. NON-STRUCTURAL CONCRETE Ile- (MIN.) TOPPING BY OTHERS WATERPROOF MEMBRANE •^, -______ BY OTHERS 2"xg" THICK MASONITE BRNG. STRIP #4 DOWEL ® 4'-0" O/C ERECTOR TO DRILL INTO KEYWAY & 4" MIN. • INTO WALL & GROUT SOLID POURED CONCRETE I WALL HOLLOW CORE BEARING ON POURED WALL DETAIL SHEET J4 Malin Concrete Products Company • 415 Lilac Street + Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Office: 651.786.7722 r Fox: 651.786.0229 + Toll Free: 1.800.336.6546 e-mail: sale®molin=cam • draftingeMalin om + www. I'n. om )5/03/02 14:22 FAX 651 786 0229 MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1J 004 HOLLOW CORE NON-STRUCTURAL CONCRETE TOPPING BY OTHERS -WATERPROOF MEMBRANE BY OTHERS Droo 000( GROUT KEYWAY SOLID BUTT PLANK TIGHT HOLLOW CORE JOINT DETAIL SHEET #8 Malin Concrete Products Company • 415 Lilac Street . Lino Lakes. MN 55014 Office: 651.786.7722 + Fax: 651.786.0229 • Toll Free: 1.800.336.6546 e-mail: soles®rnolin.com • drafting®molin.co_m , _www molin.com 05/03/02 14:23 FAX 651 786 0229 HOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS- 17 Hose down deck Wised of 9MA Z005 16 F9 erlde at joints with a still grail (shout ike bear tom. This kaepe wet 9rout m leaking old 19 Wet grout is normally 1 part cement to 3 parts send with 6% air, and enough water to make it spread easily. Work grout into joints with stiff broom or squeegee. Fill all joints. S n , / RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Permit Application City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 S-V New Construction Requirements Remodel/Repair Requirements Office Use Only 3 registered site surveys showing sq. ft of lot, sq. fl. of house; and all roofed areas 2 copies of plan Cert of Survey Recd _ Y _ N (20% maximum lot coverage allowed) 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions Tree Pres Plan Recd _ Y _ N 2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, eta 1 site survey for additions & decks Tree Pres Not Reqd _ Y - N 1 set of Energy Calculations Addition - indicate if on-site septic system On-site Septic System _Y _ N 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan if lot platted after 711193 Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (bldgs with 3 or less units Date V / _ 2 / 03 Construction Cost 7.6co Site Address l y/q ZF Q S f- POND f 004 J GFigc.A l Unit/Ste # f ?? E Description of Work V Multi-Family Bldg - Y _ N Fireplace(s) - 0 - t - 2 Property Owner RON &&11 Jy Telephonefl ( 6/2 ) 03 9. 1494 Contractor 96,4:- 40 6- 12e Address /Da/Sl h j qa - Di? city Fn? State N I Nisi, Zip 553 7 y Telephone # (%3 ) 5/'Y- °I COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING Minnesota Rules 7670 Category 1 _ Minnesota Rules 7672 Energy Code Category . Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet • New Energy Code Worksheet (J submission type) Submitted Submitted • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted Have you previously constructed a building in Eagan it?a similar plan? _ Y _ fee applies. ,. Licensed Plumber 11'I n? l Telephone #( Mechanical Contractor 'L. l Telephone # ( Sewer/Water Contractor 11" YL-k-T-----? Telephone #( N If so, 25% plan review I hereby apply for a Residential Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. /t/ /v T 7 fir/ k o fT /cl,-- ke-.t,w-?7 Pc- ?J? Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature OFFICE USE ONLY Sub Types ? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex ? 13 16-plex ? 20 Pool ? 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 03 01 of _ plex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 04 02-plex ? 10 08-plex Kj 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screen/gazebo) ? 05 03-plex ? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage ? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex Plbg_Y or_ N ? 25 Miscellaneous Work Types 31 New ? 32 Addition ? 33 Alteration ? 34 Replacement Valuation Z b CDo Census Code `-j..S `i SAC Units Nbr. of Units Nbr. of Bldgs Type of Const V _ Footings (new bldg) ?q Footings (deck) Footings (addition) _ Foundation _ Drain Tile Roof _ Ice & Water _ Final Framing Fireplace _ R.I. _ Air Test _ Final Insulation Occupancy I2-3 MC/ES System Zoning City Water Stories Booster Pump Sq. Ft. PRV Length Fire Sprinklered Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Final/C.O. X Final/No C.O. <_ Plumbing _ HVAC Other Pool _ Ftgs _ Air/Gas Tests _ Siding _ Stucco _ Stone Windows (new/replacement) Retaining Wall Approved By Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MC/ES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant License Search Copies Other Total ? 30 Accessory Bldg ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF ? 36 Multi Misc. ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 37 Demolish (Bldgr ? 43 Reroof ? 46 Windows/Doors `Demolition (Entire Bldg) - Give PCA handout to applicant Building Inspector City of Eapa 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 ----------------- Pe r"t#:?' j Permit Fee: ! 3 O 1 I I Date Received: I 1 I Staff: I ----------------I 2008 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT?PPICATION At Date: = Site Address:, Tenant: Suite #: RESIDENT / OWNER Name: ?7-e_c_ 77 L2SE? Phone: fo (1`) Address / City / Zip: j ({? ?>L? ?? ??Gfd U Ad?J/a2 Applicant is: -zIOwner -Contractor A CA "I k : TYPE OF WORK ( y-s Description of work: ab 3d `T? ?c r o rn?s? - t S Construction Cost:: Multi-Family Building: (Yes _/ No CONTRACTOR Name: J c- cx? License #: Address: 2 ?? B ?7 e t State: Zip: City: ..// Phone: 1t a?l -? C7O 5 Contact Person: ( f-? `J 2 COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING _ Minnesota Rules 7670 Category 1 Minnesota Rules 7672 Energy Code . Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet • New Energy Code Worksheet Category Submitted Submitted (J submission type) • Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer a Water Contractor: Phone: NOTE:'-Plans and supporting documents that you submrt are considered to 6e publie informahon Part16h of w 01 the mformaUon maybe classified as ran publfc if you'prov+de,specttlc reasons that wo ennrt fhe City to',FE aFe trade "secrets `y _ _? ,,;„ fiy li, a,lllt??? . conclude that-they 8111 ; I hereby ackno ge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conf ante with t e ordinances and co s of the City of Eagan; that unde and this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work i not to sta out a perm t the ork will be in acoordan with the pproved plan in th a of work which requires a review and approv i lans x A-) A9 ?C L Ja X Q Applic nt's Printed Name Appl' ant's rgn ur, Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES ? Foundation Single Family ? 01 of _ Plex ? 02-Plex ? 03-Plex ? 04-Plex WORK TYPES ? New ? Addition ? Alteration ? Replacement ? 05-plex ? 16-plex ? Accessory Building ? 06-plex ? Fireplace ? Porch (3-season) ? 07-plex ? Garage ? Porch (4-season) ? 08-plex ? Deck ? Porch (screen/gazebo/pergola) ? 10-plex ? Lower Level ? Storm Damage ? 12-plex ? Miscellaneous ? Interior Improvement ? Move Building ? Fire Repair Tr?rr?Carfv p?.7 Valuation Occupancy Plan Review pu Code Edition (25% 100%= Zoning Census Code Stories # of Units Square Feet # of Buildings Length Type of Const. Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS _ Footings (new bldg) _ Footings (deck) Footings (addition) Foundation _ Drain Tile Roof: -Ice& Water -Final _ Framing Fireplace: _R.I. -Air Test -Final _ Insulation MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Sheetrock Meter Size: Final/C.O. FinallNo C.O. HVAC Other: Pool: -Footings - Air/Gas Tests -Final Siding: -Stucco Lath -Stone Lath -Brick Windows Retaining Wall Reviewed By: r?nla - , Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES: Base Fee Surcharge /yaLP Plan Review Q, tr a MC/ES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies Total /.30. m0 (iwcuD ES ? Pool ? Ext. Alt. - Multi ? Ext. Alt. - SF ? Multi Misc. ? Siding ? Demolish Building` ? Reroof ? Demolish Interior ? Windows ? Demolish Foundation. ? Egress Window ? Water Damage ' Demolition (entire building) - give PCA handout to applicant sv?, Page 2 of 3 t •+ 4 Establ4shed in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 601. 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 !?7ururuarz Ccertificate 0 0 a 650o N J P, o I'? n 61.26 o. IIAGE AND COMPANY OCT 2 9 RECD Property located in Section 16, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, MInnesota 0 i 216 ab )@ 39' 10 11/32" JJ? ? proposed Residence sa Ikl 29 Detail I'-_0 ' ADDRESS: 1414 East Pond Road Nl as[ s/ o l L?/ 6? I'LtQINIM'3 I,(/a Top Iron 856.37 ba ??? r rG ?g8 3? 858.7 .P r SILT I co r T ` o h c fi ?w se. P, e?A TC®CD 888.27 883.7 854;9 - ? - 65.00 851.6 8..50 G3 y 85'7.3 680,0°1 3.47 tl53.1 ?' ., >$so. ?pPo5c0 j{e-rA107u`1 'ejp-i S r p?ltl,t?INCi ?' _ ?$lolo ? PT 13utr?tt{GI VJ?t7(l?1L 1. _ 7sI ?. ??T.% ?GLNT4G1? t dr GcVL( ?` Lot 5, Block 2, KINGSWOOD PONDS FIRST ADDI'T'ION g? I 843.7 119 7// 17 881.0 7 'P \ ?p868.8 / 884.5 883 8 PROPOSED RE57DENOE' UTILITY INVOICE NO. _60916 _ 880.0 659.6 S 854.5 17 je4 2 i&?RAI FRNO._____-- 9] 1-36 SCALE;: 1 40' 9Denotes Proposed Elevalion A4 -- Denotes Surface Drainage ?F]O'S Proposed Top of Block t3l 0'0 Proposed Garage Floor 13A6E4ENT WAULo°Z' o Denotes Iron Monument ? Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevalion NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before exnnvation and construction. Proposed lowest Floor Type of Building GJw" n ?Z, f .RpP 4°?? ?inttnAf-Y ?t?J? s->L:?v INV, 5v-),C) i 872.9 87 G3.=873.3 T.O.B =873.7 Iron F.F.=875.1 883.4 i / Bas. fo,SF lcnil; z v.". e \1 634.2 TGp .TVTI (V 867.30 A ` V 7'o MH 850.4 /r w50.4 ?4b.b1?G?a S O% I?7?.J. 848.1 eo. ?D sU8 \ location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described and and the NIL; said land. Surveyed by us this 10th day of SEPTEMBER 2o 01 Slgned_ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No.21753 or Gregory R. Prasrh, Minn Reg No. 24<T92 Y SA .APAWM St I t L NO. t --6-7V7 /C."( L Zauf rC;6 °Vet' JUI 1.Z9 1,54( NO.UV) V.UI M mer..24410 215 A4s, az44-51,40.,-- / ts — j 1 ?•• 2 1 Poe;t: (7 LaJ ttd,do_ Ri5 sT6/:) co Estab14shed in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue Norl.h (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 5542R urvegurs C2ertif iratr �. In .401 0 0 IIAGE AND COMPANY OCT 2 9 REC`Q Property located in Section 16, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Mlnnesota 3 D.b, 3B' 10 11/32" �t9� 65.00 I' J ppd iaiY41,,,,,i.:6.: Pro: esidenae 41a. v.v. 6.5". e. tb'e 0 Detail 1"=30 ADDRESS: 1414 East Pond Road 3:/ d14 S1,12e G fT.i! 4rNJw j Wail 4'711 be, •-et, r're./ 2,35:34 Top Iron 056.37 0 12.16 26.50 0 DrNGLJq I04ohl/ 4104 am, a.04sam 141. TCOCB 56027 INVOICE NO. _600918_._ r-.B.NO. :. s t.i-3s SCALE. 1" = 0 Denotes Iron Monument ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 077 Denotes Proposed Elevation -- Denotes Surfoce Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building pion and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Fou. $AN@.14E1..It WAUh ,ur ¢1a,5 Q1'I o.0 .011. gDP� ynINlltV- ' D1:i p( s+�t ' ' t:fv a) to 666.0 T.02,873.7 r.r.4675. I GJ .-173.3 Top :run _tii1` 861„10 4V7�"' 653.1 860.0 650.6 • Tsi�a�. f Top 8 R 504 I.N.N B43.b 1� Ps'C,Ji4{t IJU.Ft. RTn.tt- p1.10.cinti n „ _ •Nloto fT 1u tow, . fT. /✓µ-t•4aE Ldt' uJLp& ti; x Sv% Lot 5, Block 2, KINGSWOOD PONDS FIRST ADDITION 3 t.. UTILITY k.•'ERAINAGE EASEMENT ,66 1'€tel 2:€440 Pi 030.1 The only easements shown are from plats of record or Information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of n survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 10th day of SEPTEMBER 70 01 ev 1C7 01 Drown By 5...%(w ,,.,u Fie Name kwp5-2 (VI 1136inv60916 c Signed Charles F. Anderson. Minn. Reg. No.2115.5 or Gregory R. Prosch. Minn Reg No. 74992 815 L�lI�P�cl�cF1cP PrJ��J�I�c fJs�cl�cncic� nc ncJ�cPr�c �LIPMPEPUP_PcP cicPcP�ci7cB. PcJ'c1ric EMPEMrJ�cPc!c Frsc. r.PL �c E 5 5 u 7 23 n) q� iii -04 pAp� a co ore c erfeEm= r- z CD 0.7 .137c nri G Cr CD 111O.LSfID GIN dXH Id y :paltlpaa Wa}I Jo uo co 0 0 O Cl)cp 170698 NW lnb`d INNS Fie 0 o O rt .< .42 37 3 !I $ 0 e �. Fin g. 0. F�FF E C 7J D 0 aa r n cn co v m0 .1 - -i mm 1 in CD rrtmv � z 0 0 luepaineA- 4. !• I.LLt7 VNVICINI 'allIA9NVA2 JagtunN Jam cL IS a 0 ainiag{nuev Io ales Page lof1s./.421 5 Mary Granley From: Mary Granley Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:19 AM To: 'Dr. Ronnell A. Hansen' Subject: RE: Tent permit application requirements Yes, that's it. Thank you Ron, we'll go ahead with processing of your permit. Mary G. From: Dr. Ronnell A. Hansen [mailto:rhansen@stpaulrad.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:13 PM To: Mary Granley Subject: RE: Tent permit application requirements Hi Mary - I think this might be what you a re looking for. Thanks Ron Hansen From: Mary Granley [mailto:MGranley@cityofeagan.com] Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 1:23 PM To: Dr. Ronnell A. Hansen Subject: Tent permit application requirements Dear Mr. Hansen, Attached is the site plan that is part of your parcel file. This can be used for the site survey for tent placement. Please mark on the survey the location of the tent, scan and email back to me, or drop it off for attachment to your application. Again, we'd also need the fire retardant certification from the manufacturer, which you may be able to get from Midway Party Rental Thank you, anccplease contact me if you have any questions or comments. Mary Granley 1 Senior Code Enforcement Technician' City of Eagan *City of City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road 1 Eagan, MN 55122 1 (651) 675-5690 1 (651) 675- �ap 5694 (Fax)1mgranley@cityofeagan.com THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. This e-mail message, including all attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. You may NOT use, disclose, copy, or disseminate this information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail immediately. Please destroy all copies of the original message and all attachments. 7/31/2008 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA131853 Date Issued:07/10/2015 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 1414 East Pond Rd Lot:5 Block: 2 Addition: Kingswood Ponds 1st PID:10-42050-02-050 Use: Description: Sub Type:Reroof Work Type:Replace Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Please print pictures of ice and water protection and leave on site. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Building Code). Valuation: 4,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Ronnell A Hansen Tste 1414 East Pond Rd Eagan MN 55121 Nmc Exteriors & Remodeling 14276 23rd Ave N Plymouth MN 55447 (763) 684-1662 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA152418 Date Issued:10/15/2018 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 1414 East Pond Rd Lot:5 Block: 2 Addition: Kingswood Ponds 1st PID:10-42050-02-050 Use: Description: Sub Type:Reroof Work Type:Replace Description:Does not include skylight(s) Census Code:434 - Residential Additions, Alterations Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Please print pictures of ice and water protection and leave on site. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Building Code). Valuation: 4,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195 $105.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Ronnell A Hansen Tste 1414 East Pond Rd Eagan MN 55121 (612) 239-7444 Nmc Exteriors & Remodeling 14276 23rd Ave N Plymouth MN 55447 (763) 684-1662 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature