The URL can be used to link to this page

2292 Clark StCITY OF EAGAN 3745 Pilot Knob Road Eagun, MinnesoM 55122 Phone: 454-8100 HF??TI*TG ??/ PERMIT ,7uly 13, 1977 Date: R222 CZark St. Site Address: Lot /U Block Sl Sub/Sec. No. 924 Receipt No.: Single I Residentia l Multi Res., Comm./Ind. I raul Teske alteration Name New /Alter /Repair - . ` -:292 C1aZ'k St. ; Address Cost of Installation O City Phone: Permit Fee 5. 00 Ray N. Welter Heating & Air Cond. .50 Naffm Surcharge ` ? 1637 Chicago Avenue ? Address cg City ,:°,,,Is. 55407 - Phone: 5.50 Total This Permit is issued on the express condition that all work sholl be done in accordance with all applicable Stote of 7 Min ta Statutes ond City of Eogan Ordinonces. Building Official CITY OF EAGAN Remarks Addition Lot . ln ' Blk 5 Parcel ?y am us ?- Owner Street 2292 Clark St_ State Eava,MN 55122 . - Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment ReCeipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK * SEWER LATERAL WATERMAIN * WATER LATERAL WATER AREA STORM SEW TRK * STORM SEW LAT 1976 3 ' CURB & GUTTER SIDEWAIK STREET LIGHT ?' -- ` $O 13.56 5 67 O WATER CONN. 205.00 9UILDING PER. s,ac 450.00 2658 4- 3- 6 PARK A CITY OF EAGAN PERMIT TYPE: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Permit Number: i.' 7 E, 6 Ea an, Minnesota 55122-1897 ' ? ? ' `, ? •"' 9 Date Issued: (612) 681-4675 SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: 'i t; 111 t! .? i li i ?,!> i 1 ???4f ,- ?r?4p PERNIIT SUBTYPE: TYPE OF 1NORK: <. i F,A rI I-,l ROtll ..: : --------------------- ----------------- [ I :?I A 1ttc .`i 121 i'tl)of f1tIF" 111 ';7(IF?M OAMAFef- Permit Holder Date Telephone # PLUMBING HVAC Inspection Date Insp. Comments FOOTINGS FOUND FRAMING ROOFING L ROUGH PLUMBING Pl BG AIR TEST ROUGH HEATING GAS SVC TEST INSUL GYP BOARD FIREPLACE FIREPLACE AIR TEST FINAL PLCiG FINAL HTG ORSAT TEST BLDG FINAL DOMESTIC METER IRRIGATION METER _ FLUSH MAINS CONDUC7IVITY TEST HYDROSTAIIC TEST DSMT R.I. BStVI7 FlNAL DECK FTG DECK FINAL l q ,?7 q ?-U ,41W .?? ? ?-? ? • ? ? -Jt. U L10 , [35, 1'-cv&?, tlclts q+!I- l . ? CQ? 10 7L u.o ?n --414""? en? ? a,21l-ldul ? a?.a??c?.?? .? ? ?_ ?Q a-m "4'," ? - ,o.?? a,;,J ?-ld?.c??eG?-?e??,?l%,?.?,? • , h 4V ? ?---- - - , • . ? . , y `. ? - CITY of EAGAN BUILDING PERMIT Owaos 24,l..4-??b-e.7?........iL' .:................................ Addreu (Preseni) y(?.?Q....? ?...... tf.`.?! .................... Buildar ................ ---r..}C------------------------ .------------ .................... Addreae ...........................................................................................•-- DESCRIPTION r ? . :. N2 3887 3795 Pilo! Kaob Road Eagan, Miaaesola 55122 454-8100 Dels ,7C7 Blorieo To Be Usad For Fzanf Deplh Heigh! Eei. Cos! Permi! Fae Aemarlu ??- ? ? a 3y I ?y?,G6 .......... r. ?? r ..............................._..'-................ Per ........ .. t/...K?K-.. /. ?"•iz^s................ ....... .. .. .Mayor Building Impeclot/t.... Tdis pesmit does not auShotiae the use oi slreels, roade, alleys or sidewalks nor does it giva the ownes or h!s agen! the right fo creafe eny silualion which is a nuisance or which presents a hazard !o the heallh, saiety, eonvenience and general welfare !o anpone in the eommunify. THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISE WHILE THE WOAK IS IN PAOGAESS. C^ This ia !o eeriifp, !hal...?,c.;..;.c.?.?.er.:a ............................ has parmissioa !o arect a..:.s??"?s!e}`.?l•?.??!s......... _upon the above described premise subjecf !o the provisions of all applicable Ordinanees fox the Cilp of?agan /a s /Z y-9 C1T'Y C^ Fi'iG:^,N 7,:5 Pi.].ot K:tob R^ad Eagtin, N•.inr,c:;o=;:a 5?122 PEPEIT Iv0>: 833 The City oi Ea.gan hereby grants to RaY N. Welter Heating Co. of 4637 Chicago Ave. So., tVis. 55407 a AEATING Permi+, far: (Owner) Windsor Den. µ?; 2292 Clark St.pu,-suant to applicetion c3aied 5/17/76 .__?, I'ee Pa1c: $20.00 de.ted this 20 day of ? ? ,50ac ?? &ui=:;.i;ig DZecnar_ical Permits: Sid lot&u_: jOD-D5' ? . ctr,r c^ EA carr ?7c . . ? . ::(ii Pi7.ot Kneb ?;o^d . ra.-,itl, N11T1T1O^u0t3 55122 - . . . ? . I PEP,MIT ATO. • 670 Tiie City of E;).gan hareby graxits to ThomPson P1umbin1 OD• o£ 12201 Minnetonka Blvd. a PLIRIDING Permit fer: (Owner) Nindsor Dev. Corp. 4 ---- ? ---- ?__,__ 29 Clark St. ? ptirsuant to appiication c3a?ed ? 4/14/76 billed -•.e $su?z ___ 1$ 60•00 &.ted this 14 day o° April ? 1976 ? 4.00 $/c j. Duiiding Inspeetir ica). Ferr^i.ts. 7 PLANT 1 APPLE VALLEY RED-E-MIX, INC. APPIE VALLEY 6801 WEST 150th STREET YLANT 2 APPLE VALLEV, MN.55124 BURNSVILLE PHONE: 432-7732 CENTRAL DISPATCHER PLXNT 2 CHANHASSEN PLANT 4 ST. LOUIS YARK 5?-1,4/ 7-/Z- 7,'- v .; . x. . . ; - _ , ?.- Sq. Pt. Thick ' SQ. Ft. Thick ? 8 162 2. .? 7 4. 129.75 2.5 '.." ... _.. _ . ...- . . ..- 76.25 4.25 108 3. 72 4.5 ONE CUBIC VARD OF CONCRETE WILL COVEP ,.. ; ?? '?` ( C'.€ .r?..?,+'? <r-I?L ?. ?3? . ? QF EAGAN CITIZEPJ COMPLAINT N0, COUNC I LMEMBER_ ,. CITIZEN NAME ADDRFSS__? 7 -; PHONE ._ DarE ; c;` COMPLAINT_ l ?r-- ? STAFF REPLY - - - s. -- ' -- - - / " ?' 7,.? r) i-?------ -- ` '-== / Cz.cz By `?., ?? This request void 18 months from #o6 ya/ Date of this Request_ JUlY 15, 1977 P 5 5 4 4 I, as7ULicensed Electrical Contractor ? Owner, do hereby request inspection of the above electri- cal wiring installed at: Street A dress or R?u ? Section - ? DT ownship Range County vakato Which is occupied by Paul Te she (Name ot OccuDanq Is a roughin inspection required on this job? No ? Yes ? Ready Now 21 Will Call ? PowersupPlier_ Dakato Countp Elec address Farmington Electrical Contractor East.nn S ri Co Contractor's License No.?'?y.91 (COmpany Name) MailingAddress ROUte 1 BoX " Prior Lake_ N7n_ 55?t79 or owner maKing 7hls 1 Authorized Signature v"`7 .? P t? ? yC .,?`? j(ner?Phone Na _44'7- 2490 (Electrical Contract o?TOw Making ThIS Installatlon) Q4?QQ DUQaD QOpw Minnesota State Board of Electricity ?- 1954 University Ave„ St. Paul, Minn. 55104-Phone 645•7703 iECK ELOW WORICOCO ERED BY'THIS REQUEST INSPECTION 5544 'ypeo[Buildin N g ew qdd. Rep. Home ? ? ? Cryftk pPplimces Wired Fot Check Equipment Wired Fo` Uuplex ? ? ? Range Water Heater Li ? Temporazy Wiring ? Apt. Bldg. ? E3 ? Dryer ? Lighting Fixtures ? Comme[cial dldg. ? ? ? Fumace ? Electric Heating ? Indusfial Bldg. ? ? ? pjr Conditioner ? Sdo Unloader ? Faim Other ? 0 ? El ? 0 LiSt 2therst Bulk Milk Tank List ? Others ? to 100 I TOTALFEE I 5.5[1 I, the Electrical Inspec[or, hereby certify that the ve inspection has been made. `1 (Rough•in) ? a ? r Date This rtequest void 18 months from ? /?? Date_ 17- X0 2? YILLAGE OF EAGAN WATER SERVICE PERMIT 3795 Vilot Kno6 Rood PERMIT NO.: 1947 4/14/76 Eagan,MN 55124 DATE: Zaning: RI _ No. of Units: 1 Owner: WiIId80! DeV. QDLp. Address: Site Addmsa _ 2292 Clazk St.. B REl9 Plumber: 'Phrnn"ann vli hinq (p _ Me[er N y.f'2??o?_?? 7 Connection Charge:?;.0 ?? r / J?zl??l-a Account Depo ' - - R d ? 696 billed lb'00 P i F er ea erm t ee: - _Sn bil2ed-596- I ayree t complr wihh tM Villoye of Eagan Sumharge: __60__00_P4-- Ordina4? Misc. Charges: ?q TotaL By Ua[ePaid: Date of Insp.: Insp.: VILLAOE Oi EAGAN SEWER SERVICE PERMIT 37^5 R16thnobRood PERMITNO.: ?1 U4 Eagen, MN 55121 DA7'E: 4[14/76 Zoning: gi No. of Units: 1 Owner: Windsoz DEV. ODZ'p. Address: Site Address: 2292 Clark St. L10B5 RH9 Plumber:-Thnalpsion P1imhiny_(y+ 4/13/76 #2658 100.00 pd 1 oyne to complY with tha Villaga of Eagan Connection Charge: 350.00 Pd Ordinancas. Acwunt Deposit Permit Fee: 10.00 billed 696 Surcharge: • 50 b111ed 696 gy; Misc. Charges: Date of Insp.: Total: Inep.: Date Paid: ?Qp ? t? f ------- _?QO? _ GY-- - 1?esc"S?Ct J Q --. _mfaKl i?atV!_'M -- (AArL .I??rl • ?'t?? ??ILH_?_o_nS O ? ?+l i r ?(!,?rM? r1f?! !-? ain . . . e ?,l.• e r /Lt t. felwl da_r_d I o9d-l? ---- Y ' I DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION April 9, 1976 Mr. Dale Peterson City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Peterson: RE: Lot 10 Block 5 2292 C1ark Street Eagan, MN Enclosed nlease find a check for building permit application and fees as a?llacated on the eheck stub in the amount of $1,051.50. This home will be a Model 75-30, Elevation C, and will contain the following: - Brick front - Family room and 4th bedroom above - 1 fireplace - 1st floor laundry area - ?,ppliances - Inter com - Patio doors family room - Bath and 3/4 up - Oak flooring LR, DR, and 2 BRS - Various other small revisions Attached also find a copy of the proposed plot plan. Sincerely, WINDSOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORP,TION Warren R. Anderson Vice President inTRA/ks Enclosures SUITE 192, 4660 WEST 77TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 • PHONE (612) 831-0717 MASTER CARD LOCATION C??? JZZ?r,? k;Z 92 OWNER STRUCTURE AND LAND USED AS Permi} No. Issued Issued To I Coniractor Owner BUILDWG PLUMBING CESSPOOL - SEPTIC TANK I WELL ELECTRICAL HEATING GAS INS7ALLING %3.1 a?u <9-61 SANITARY SEWER i OTHER OTHER Items Approved (Initial) Date Remarks Distance From Well FOOTING SEPTIC . FOUNDATION FRAMING . 74P ? CESSPOOL TILE FIELD FT. FINAL ELECTRICAL HEATING _ ? DEPTH OF WELL GAS INSTALLATION SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOI DRAINFIELD PLUMBING WELL SANITARY SEWER Violations Noted on Back COMMENTS: . . _ _ ._ _ .... ._ , . ...?. ? ?. ` / . . !? • a?r? .. . c,.4, 1 `aL?LR7: Cl2n.L .S'?. ?w Ati 6ay9 , , .._._. _ ; 1 I f ' b??.ey,e ? ?40 •7688 ( .. ... ....__.1 . ._.. . _ ..._.._ . _ . . - ..._. .... ., ....? .. _.._. . ._ , a?F. . _._.._.__..? ' ? ... ... ___ _ i ' ` ? . .... .. ? .. . . .__. ? _.. ?. .... ???..«... ..?..?. _.. .... ?_._? ? .. . .. __?... ._ ?.. ' ... ?...? M ... Y : . . ...... .. ... GKeaSael..Ltlaq„A-OBr6 _ ._... ! . __ _ __.. . enaJL ... __. oZy.?u? yg . .._..._ _ . . . _._ _.?.. , r42. " ?`?bootl a,.A a. ya.y .y9 2o,yl? --- ii ./ / ??e.iSoCeer 4nea. .?. . .. .... __._ ._. . ; ? . , . . . ?.i Yfne.?,/aaE ?..1aa.!! _ __,. . ._ _ ___._. ... . . . , ...__. ___ . _ _._ .. _ _._._. . _._.. ? i Arrvt..?c? _ ? 2val1 ?oea.o.ihy f?nsa ieV. IS•/.A.3 .2s Ofe 1.4. c( 4,v?. CLam.(,r,J?W? _ „ ------ _ .?gula-Gscfi4ma, ?is_?;?E) _ .. .. ,, __ _. ._ .. .074 II.65? ... _. Jejs? j4d4a 12iYr. i1 ------ , ? .. „ _ !;. iS.11ti, e?o.r? ry?n? c? Cl,a? ?,s? I3y, e$ oz8 : 3 7,a . '. --_. ? ..._,.____... , . ? i; I, . %7' 2 '/7.. ._ 43. OQ i; . ?.y ? g?, ?/oe? ?P ?r? ?:? . I1 . io.o •Y8i _ y,8? ? _ "' , _.- - ...__ _ _ 131fU Aoss A`lldw(X - ?- ? ?' ?nn ?x`?snien l.eaG(S aYlx: __._..__._ - )Y x ./7 = -- ''?//.$9 ', ? I? . . 13 i u ---------- -- -- ----- -- __ ,. . __._ ..._ . _ . _ --- ------ _. . ?. 1 _ . ` ___ _ -"-- --- ---- ___ __--- ---- -- ----- - - - - i? -ToIa? eseo? nee-?/CEr,/fr,q r Anea. _ - _-_ ? 9 --- - -` - _ - . - - -- - _ . ? __ --- _ {?o-?o( (?7'U I,esS....•4fleuel??"?_-- "-_.. _ --- -- .?? r?.._ ? _.:.. .. --.-. . ---- --- -- ----- - -- - - -- - A . - ` ..„.? . , ? ? ., , - --._--- ------ -_ __ -------._.___-? .__---__._ _.- _ -- ? I -- - ? l 0'f'n ? . ??oor ?ver ? UYa ?BC.?.? ? _? .. • .. `, ' .r zi. --- - -------- ----- ---' -- - +-- • ? "f" ? . ? , :. 41,(ac.vaj: j?y LY64 79 y In __ -- ss .667 ------ j?- _ ..?..-- -- --- - - --- ----- - -- . . _? it . _:-__ --_ ? . :... „ r? !/ows? $7U .Cnss,',. la}g!/s y --_.._.__ a Y3.37 _--- -- C ` ,. ?6s`?pr?s? 13 f[J i{ess s " 3J?`). 83 t.`' S??.,37.t "` -- -- - -- - -- _.?. s'3 O3 --- -- - --- - - f'?uclc?c? hWeuJc? lna?? nqgu.?`?,`w'?s e-? S[3c ? ' . . . . . - __ ,. .?. ? --- --- _ . --- P4'F - ?m,. s',`•il -- ` _ `_-- - _ _-- , , ? - - _,_ _ _ -- _--- -- - --- Z4 L?eu,fc?_r+e?tsr"s A_ _a !9 tSu!( , . ' ? hcuc ?'? . V.6 _ ___ _ _---_ .. ? -- --- ---- --- - - - - ----- --- -? - - -- • --- ; . ; 6 b . ? ., ` -- .-_. ... __ _ . ?i .. - .. .<. _ , . .' .. .,._ '.; . _--__..__...._._____.._ .._. _...--__... _,___.....-_.. i , . . . . . j: I? ?i , . , . .. j( „ ?t - = - . .. . .. . _ --.. _ _. __,._ _: , .. ?.??. .. ., , _ _ .. _. .. . . _ . „ Y 1 I _.._--- 17 £x?f- B ? . , ./7 - ---i I ?- ------- -----.. _--------------- ------....----- ---?-- ?--------- ._._.______ ?fl /3r.cd , .38 ` i. • ! 4% •? a/Li;rG'/.u - --. ?---- -- -- I/.ao - ------ ii --. ? ---------- ? -'___ __?-- ?s+ : ,?;. ---- 1'?Ps?.(Q° ? j ------- /3.08 _ -- ------ i ii 1J" _ .09{, . - ----- 4s, SP,A ! le,, /?.`/" .17 -- ' ?'...a (3f. .3g ---!f" Se?iC ylls(bbrX. .y`l._------ ?,? , A?:o 6Y ___ _ _ ---__ _ ---_..?-..------- - - 't°a-?.. ( R. " ! • G 7 _- L•• Ive. ----_------- s??. '???e'?a! Flo A . J;,4 . . G I ?, . . .. ? - rt- .,::w ? • ;?,,?-. - , . . . "" _ _.'_ . . . ... _ _ . __'- _?. . . .._ . . _... . . _ __ y" as c 7 _..?. _. __.'. ..___.. . __.. ........... r . ` : ? . - . . oy . i .I .. -. - . ? r-.- . . . - - ----- -- - ___ . - ___ _- - - -,- - ' .. ., . - . .. •. :? ?i ' ? _ i _ . . ? ? . --- :... --- ?csr ?J? a/L?. a•fl L,1. N.3p -, - --_.. ^ ; ._ ..._. ._ . ,.. __ . • -- - - . _ . --_ , : ,. i; -.. _ __= -._-- -----=- -?i- - - ---- i{ LEO MURPNY MAYON TMOMAS NE06E9 CITY ACYINIlTRATON . , ALTCE BOLKE THOMAS EGAN UTY CL[aK MRRK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITM CITY OF EAGAN TMEOOORE WACNTER . COVNCIL MEMBEPS 3796 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA eeizz PMONE 464•GI00 Octcaber 19, 1979 ??? Paul H. Teske 2292 Clark Eagan, hIIN 55122 RF: LOT 10, BILICK 5, RI.VER HILIS 92I3 ]Jear ^9r. and Mrs. ?'eske: On July 13, 1976 our departrnent made the final inspectiari on youn ccme and found that it met the rec;uiranents of Ordinance 36 of the Building Codes. Apnroximately 16-24 mariths later you oontacted me with tte problem you were having with Y7indsar DevelopTent on doing warrantee waork. I r,et with you ard then oontacted N?indsor DeveloFxnent in an effort to help you. I was informed by the,develcper that they would not do anything else to your hane tmtil the court acticn you had initiated was finalized. At that time I infornied you that I could do nothing else to help you and t*iat the court or yourselves waild have to work it out with P7indsor Develou±Innt Coxporation. Yours vexy truly. le eterscn. Building Official DSP:tlp cc: P9ayor P!lurphy Adninistrator Hedges THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SVMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITV. ? ' t.•?LCc (7 it. `??? :1.?:,?,? ??Le ?l'????•t:1<':' ? ?-[t..? [?? ,?. r , y cc' /?U-•- , i! ? /? `?? '-^/J?'i??fJc '?,'t ,''tri;., :'r(`?il?.J [?. •?, ???,? .7`lZt?_ •,,, :?,,,.,?., z? fh ?_?: 1 ? - --. ?.•vt. ..:.? Jt.?'_?1. ? ec'tl..c?fr-' ? li •! f . t 7 ? ,t i - ..I ' t : ! i ( ?'. J rv ? _ ? ?r ? , j ? I ? . ?? :?.1.• ,?-.-•:?L? ,-f.:_? J':,?d?.i?:: .<; :(-i',y?, ,??1 -!r I'?.t:..`_ .!t'.(._Li• ? ...;' ?f_-?Ci L ,?r?.Z., .?? ;.i? ?-?- .! L ?,•` _ f - . •, "1' :ia, Li , "? .?.':(.?_???/.1(_?t • r?- -? s i . i ? 4J .. •a c.?+ m. l I .esrn.. •w???:'?P?. M?1-?1!? n?. w?,.n•.r .. •?•ci ro?.c cv. <.u. CiTY Cjrr- CAGAPJ JIiB V'?!01 kh0• OO?J [.AGAN MitJNCSJ7A w±i12 ?nu.1 H. 01[M '?,-?•:^'.,r 19, 1973 IVi. Jro Paots, ?li??'ltl?r u' . uo _.?. F,i :;, '•F: S?iO1 •.c- ['.;:y ':! ,.. ,. I :.,,....i'. llym::i a:?.?;?i..;?:::?_u_i•.,• oC vcrur cf`i,xl to ar_.s:v4xr,i,? re, ,. }c., r.•c_ ?i:i?i?,?_ 2c, in,F.,ct. .h:i ha:-? oP Mr. 'tri' ' .:;. Paul. ?.'" Ciw•k S:.rc._t. E;:;.,r„ ?t;irk•u•t.?. t'rk:ios:t9 :T,i u.ii: `in:3 a cKYc:rulo::ical ,%. ,,!. ,tt pr• . ma. !," pe tn r111 T?u• T:tl.v's ha-ti: , . . ..m ,..._ ., i .%+,:1 a lil.irr! on t`te. CoiirK-i] ?1.;"1::9.J, 'il?s?'ay. tk:?!crt?r•r :I) .:i, .. ... , t:l Wi; _,r. .t:iS :Ct_i.c,n. _.l?i•?. A^v;. , i ? ? . . ?QV ? . r ? -? ?? . : -.t . . t t f,•?-<w?:l PAi'A.P ('C: _ . n '._.?. I'.1L11 '?1••SnL` 1 'h L l.Jhh: 17:Ah i =ti. .!H 'r_ 5 V" E?t.0 F 5 Tk EN:7N A^IU:.<<VWT41 IN "v?ti C?iMML'VfTl. • i'.'•1C:','J: 71Dru L. E'.'.:'i.,::s, C1Tf lt'h.T'iN'-iPAiDR F1'.?Y•l: Di!Ll: S. P:E':.:t6ltr', HIiITI)Iw '.?c: iCLtli. :Y.?- tS:+J:''.PF72 15, 1979 . 224.'. tij!>,D`'C' - MR. &'?i5. PAI?i. TF.iiFr;, CX^%iL;i?S , '_'. 19-5 i_? icj?6 . .,,:lv . •, 3;,.',c?_r 1, 1976 >tar?h;'3,` 1978 (iS r,caths :Lter) +hrc!? 3.' 29"IB ut ` 4U,7 iss:?-d to wincisor 7t.•.e1c.:_-rent Corp. Firul Irstk?ctior m x:e Tesi:e's toc* possessim 7lesk4,'s re,r_,x:,t?.`d a re-in.>?ectian [2,fr.<K_ian was .*?fle an:i wr_t aieas were fourd on, eYte_*ior wal,l at Lx:ilin9 1L-ie at souUr..w!:t roznez of biil:?inr. ' This indicated hiq;i hwnidity in the trane c.:n:3Er,: ;.rr.1 ai a oold spot ar crilina line. '.,:rci: ;, 1973 . Callcxl ['red Reisl:LS o.`. 4tiirr3sor Pavelc;xreeit tu see what w-vs : ei?N dore. I was infor..Ed that hindscir hrl betn tzying to cY:ri-ec:t prcLiens but r>r:e:s h3ci sta..-ted mir_ act?on so nothing mnre woul.d be d.,m until acti.m wis settled. tJoce -- Mrs. Teska stat?d r:-i.AL Plir.,lsor had F.een replaci:x4 sici-nc; and rac:aulirirq• •t,•--?. . ??-- . , ' .,? , ? ,".:sk.:_ s aruj inft?rr:??, c. tivY?: nr tGirxscr . ? im,' pcsi`'ion `tac t:,..rhe szare as t:.ri C'.I:i? IlJd PidpSiYi 51!iQ': :-.?! f:u";3'L 1(ISjX.?CClcCi. -a_IIEd ??:.:TT>I'1'? -- Sarfti C'.7i?Jld1^C. '"._...'.1_. .']•.7 rr.iJe?'i!?fl [':.LIiS; :it.3':'- [)? Mt1IL"K_°:Ot9 F.'Ii.'J(h:. r.,cdE' Di,.:z:ion Fitl WV)*1xl an i:isuc.?ctiyi. Buildirig i:r-Y;e . G.ivi=ic,n st.?:?Yl ueir policy was o;±,y ir.vitari.,^n' bui it :o.?.d te ;r,ir.tless as ta> r.nach time 1L:•3 ?.'..r.:•;?t? 3nd t_r_ m.ir,: chanr.es (xw:d have bcen m-si:.... 3ui lci.i.,y Code Division callwl m ftir. tus!_ory oE "?eskc 's tYw ar:d rcp)rt nf what h.-0 teen 3one. .? ?' ? ?i • . ? ; C?-1 ::i'?:i_`::',",.11 d ict.:.E'r ilCJll 7'P_Skt? '3 TY:`T 1C£;tlTyj ^'?E' Lf'i ir.viteState T:e:;x?ctc•.cs_ , ? ? ' ' S ? "'°"+?'`° ? ,?? e ?# ? !' ? n S r , :' ?' 4? ? r . ? 7 ? ? ? 7? ¢ 4 U 1 , ?w ' Y . < S ? . . . . . . .. ?..- ? . .? '.? ? ?r a 1Lsk- Q nkn2-ru`?z 15 1974 Pa:ie 2 • _ . . . , _ . , . , .. . . . . ?a . . . . "a,. ,. qctotrr 19, 1479 Sent 1etter to Teske's with a cz-lpy to . Mayer btuephy rnstatinq mY Positien rat to inr.erfere until lec7a1 c14Jn was settled. . . . . ,?a. • t.LDverrber 10, 11 6 12, 1.9?9 Calls tn Ci ty eloctea oft'icials,F'i t? ,. •• . .. -:•? - _At:a?wv, City J4hninistrator ard Maycr elect. i..., - Ncr,,crber 14, 1979 Discussoi situation witl: City Attorney an? StatF 3uilc:.ing Ccxle Division. . t.trs. 'It'ska wantr_d nam oF nerson to call at Builciing Caie Division and tr,en calieri tlr wnonq perscm. I` further clarification is rncessary, please oontact mP. Res;rctf'u11y suhnitted, -- , - i ,,?,fs, .. . _,\ • , Diale S. Peterson Ri?il??irx? Cfficial ? CISP: t_'p . ? •: ?_':_; -` ? %.•.. ' i'??.- Y {?!, ?+?? ? ..SV. : Y • ` - Y . . . . . . . . ?.,n'?'.. , . . . . . . . .. s 4 . . . . , n . . ' . . . . .. .. . _ . ., .f . .c?+n tt ?e?? /,?1 ?r.:.??._.li?; ? l/ I ) ? 'w Cc?a.acc?d n?v? CQ,?v ? _?.i:me.?.ctcaC "+-! .GlJ?'.?/? '• ?? U z . _.._ _ . ?: ? -1?//?1;/ !?'L OJ?Cl?..L? ?J"1tut:rt?? J? ? 7 ?'+" ??? G?^c LGY • °rr^r-;?<",.i. ?. i ? ?? - ?? /??V/N{/.? •l?y?'IUI?? H... .e?CV?+fb? t }1 . ?C ?.? ?L •/G ?j S7 ;,?,+r . ?? ,?, .? «, ? ? ? _:c'. ,??.1? r.?.?-?.? ?z` x/_? .?'?.?'.??. • l? ? '' ?_? CY??`-kl? /!.•: A, /'/ f / / '1 ?Ar?t.f CCI._"Li ???LF ??L'?.C.s1'.1.'7? ?'C'L?'uGGi? C.1.Y i.•?. ?:j? J p : . . ? ? ?? . R??? r? . x :. ?e - «,?.e[i. a. '? ?,t'3 :S s +f hC.-ee f??? ?°"'•.id.. .. t wc :.. , .. - , ?_..? y k p r bfr ? • ,s,? ?...?{ ! ".xxp- FeS,?? '?e S v w. s..n. af++A?? k _ "'.'_.._ '?... _ _ _• _!. .. ? ,'.'?"f4:. ?. •.? ke r'?f^:a. . ti.?'?.e??d,?'- A.?1Y?! ? IL: i} ?- aL??tC-t?i _C.4 ?-t iJ ? ?{ / fi.' ^ • b;a . + ?/ ? ? ? ? ? ?G_ ??C:??L' ?? -r?ct ..Ct? / - Lyc JC iY'L•? Le et?' ?1? . L ?. ? ? • . 1.1t-?t21 LrL 9d.':?.(Q ?c•rt: rI ) L / rI ?d0-2E4C4'Cot ? ?1/?L? = ? .Al..i. t 4L,4.J.- U .? ? ?&44??:??? .»? v. , d.. `i . 1.p; ? .t E Y+?i 'nT ? ? ? ?' ?,7?? y ,?• ' E7ti'?rt . _ . . . .- - ' . .. . ,? . ? . . - . ? L' ?i...;L ' `. .? N ? .. . . . . 5Wi1a?3•P's!.iCAi??°? Ya . . . .} J'i. . .Y I ' .. • xF5 . ? . . .? `i . . , .;.? . ?.'?. S'?. ..t. • ^ • . lY•?'Ir w' te y, J e.yi ?t?e ?1 r y t [ ' 1 ?' .?.}X.+.2',?{`?c a: t. -j}Mi'f Nf r ai tr'i tr ? ? ;??'y ?Y?' y e., I ' ?t lN ?r}u ? CR;?ti}>?g L? y? lrEY ?, ht{ ' I lI ' a r..I'?4.If??iA:tlY L ..4 ` WM'"f'bVlNWi(? HW'1?"T+ 6^If1(rYi4?jj!y?1,.6}QW"'A!`?Q?:P 4?'.Vy ' .:: M ?v Y'. . ,f"y.i4 t 4y?'??!#?Cv'l`-,?+Xl.i4C?c.q.'.?' ' ?P?•??: . . • 5 ? ' 1 . ?1? ? ? ? ".:i. :'. ? ?".. . .t 1 ? }? .r.??" s ? . _. .. . .. . . ... ._ ?f?i _ )ii' 3( MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1979 SUBJECT: PAUL H. TESKE RESIDENCE, 2292 CLARK STREET (RIVER HILLS ADDITION) Mrs. Paul Teske has contacted the City Attorney's office and Building Inspector's office, asking if inspections and other advice could be given to them concerning problems that have occurred with their home during the last three years. Due to the fact that Teske's have brought civil action against Windsor Development Company, the home builder, it was the advice of the City Attorney that the City not become independently involved with this matter unless subpoenaed by the court at the time of the hearings and/or trial. This is the adviee that the City Attorney and Building Inspector have both given Mrs. Teske during the past couple of weeks. Last week, Mrs. Teske asked if the City would make a special request to the State of Minnesota Building Officials' Department, asking a representative of the State to make a special inspection of her place of residence. I assured Mrs. Teske on Friday, November 9; 1979, that I would review this request with the Building Inspector, Mr. Dale Peterson, on Tuesday, November 13, 1979, and the matter would be handled according to policy at that time. I spoke with Mr. Peterson this morning and he informed me that he has already contacted Mr. Duane Grace of the State Suilding Department requesting that he make such an inspection and the State was also reluctant to become involved due to the fact that there is a civil suit in progress. Z asked that Mr. Peterson again contact the State Building Department on behalf of the City of Eagan requesting that they make an inspection and I have notified Mrs. Teske of this action. Whether the State makes the inspection or not, pending the lawsuit, is the decision of that agency. Hopefully, this will resolve the matter as it relates to her contacting members of the City Council in recent days. I ' 10 Ci y Administrator MEMO T0: THCMS L. HEOGES, QTY ADNIINIST12ATtlR FR(XM: DAi.E S. PE'PERSON, BUIIDING C1FF'ICIAL DATE: NOVENSER 15, 1979 SUB.7ECT: 2292 CI,ARK S772EE,T - NIR. & MRS. PAUL TESKE, dWD1ERS April 13, 1976 Pernut #3887 issued to Windsor Development Corp, July 13, 1976 Final Inspection made 9eptatibes 1, 1976 Teske's took possession March 3, 1978 7ieske's requested a re-inspection (18 cronths later) March 3, 1978 Inspection was made and caet areas were found on exterior wall at oeilinq line at southwest corner of kxailding. This indicated high hianidity in the haoe oondensing on a mld spot at oeilinq line., March 3, 1978 Called EYed Reislus of Winr]sor Development to see what was being done. I was inforned that windsor had been txying to correct pxcblans but aaners had started murt action so nothing more would be done until action was settled. Note -- Mrs. Teske stated that Windsor had been replacing siding and recaulking. Mrch 3, 1978 'Peleghone Teske's and informed tlian of Windsor's position and that my position had to the same as too much time had elapsed sinoe my final inSp2cticn. October 10, 1979 Teske's called Mayor Murphy -- scme ocnplaint. October, 1979 Teske's called State of Minnesota Building Cocle Divisian and wantecl an inspecticn. Building Code Division stated their policy was on my invitation only but it would he pointless as too much time had elapsed and too many changes oozld have been made. OctobPS, 1979 Building Code Division called me for histoxy of Teske`s hane and report of what had been done. October, 1979 Reoeived a letter Pmm Teske's recruestiTm me to invite State Inspectors. Teske NovemUer 15, 1979 Page 2 October 19, 1979 Novenber 10, 11 & 13, 1979 Nwanber 14, 1979 Sent letter to Teske's with a oopy to Mayor Murphy resta}; *+g my positicn not t,o interfere until legal claim was settled. Calls to City elected officials, City Attorney, City Adninistratar and Mayor elect. Discussed Situation wi.th City Attorney ard State Building Code Divisiwz. Mrs. Teske want:eci nkane of.person to call at Building Code Divisicn and then called the wrong person. If ftttther clarification is necessazy, please mntact me. Respectfully suYmitted, ? sIM?? Dale S. Peterson Building Official D6P:tlp I-EO M1pPMY MAVOM t ?TMOMFS EGAN MARN PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITH TMEOOORE WACMTER COVNCIL MEMBEX9 TMOMAS HEOGES ? CITY ACwINIlTRAiCw •LYCE BOLKE GITY CLEPK CITY OF EAGAN 9795 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 97122 P</? % ? /ar-??s PNONE 454-61oo Novanber 19, 1979 Mr. Don Pates, Director MN Building Code Division 408 NSetro Square Bldg, 7th & Robert Streets St. Paul, NA7 55101 Dear pon: This is a fannal request for a representative of your office to aaocnpany me at your convenience to inspect the hare of Mr, and 44rs. Paul Teske, 2292 Clark Street, Eagan, Minnesota. Eticlosed you will find a ahronological list of events as presented.by me to our AcLninistrator. The 'Ipske's have requested axxi have reoeived a plaoe on the Council agerxia, Tuesday, Novatas 20 apparently to rsquest tfiis action. Very tnily yours, Dale S. Peterson Buildi.ng Official DSP:tlp cc: . & r7rs. Paul Teslce ity Aclninistrator Hedges Enclosure •mNl!1 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTN AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. y 7 9 - Mr. Donald Pates Director of the Building Code Division 408 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dear Mr. Pates: - / ,November1979 P _?? ?? V Re lJ> ?,?i Mr. Peterson's letter is such a collection of errors and omissions, I hardly know where to begin. We didn't keep exact dates in the beginning because we had no idea we would ever come to this. The City said the house passed code when we purchased it and we took their word for it. It was a construction company from whom we requested repair estimates that opened the question of code violation, and either they called Mr. Peterson or had us call him ourselves for a re-inspection. Up until less than two months ago we were unaware of the code even being a law, and a state law at that. Had we any idea at the time we filed suit against Windsor that we were dealing with law and code violations, the suit would most definitely have been handled differently. Since we are just now becoming aware of the laws, we are now merely asking for its enforcement because it does not seem right to us that a violation of the law should be subject to civil settlement. We are undertaking this request entirely on our own, without assistance from our lawyer, because we can as private citizens go to the government with a law violation whereas ethics prohibit our lawyer from doing so as a lawyer involved in the civil suit. In other words, he is representing us against Windsor in a civil suit arising from: 1. Their never finishing the house in accordance with the purchase agreements, 2. Their refusal to honor their one year warranty, and 3. Their refusal to honor their five year warranty. We, as private citizens, are attempting to have the law enforced because, as you can see from the enclosed general letter of our dealings with Windsor (see enclosure #1), this case could drag on for years. They didn't honor the code, their purchase agreement, or either of their warranties, their agreement to settle, and there is no guarantee they will honor any court settlement in December either. In the meanEime, we are cold and wet, wasting fuel in an energy crisis, and paying outrageous utility bills. It could also be the case that so rmich of the civil action falls under the jurisdiction of the law and thereby is enforceable by law, that we could drop the civil action and let the law be enforced. We could then get on with wr lives and these stomach ulcers I'm developing over this could heal. At this point we are faced with an unsalable house, large doctor bills and legal fees, and monumental repair bills. We can't understand how this has happened. I Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page 2 Had it not been for your Mr. Hendrickson and Mr. Sanders, who have patiently and honestly answered our questions and further explained the laws to us, we do not know w hat we would have done. They aze a credit to your office and the first assurance we have had that there are good and honest people at least in the State government. We do not wish to involve the city or state in a civil action, nor do we ourselves want it. Some of our problems are in the c wer letter; other things that worry us as being unsafe and/or mi.ght be under your jurisdiction we have listed below. You might be able to reassure us that we are physically safe in some of these problems. They are: 1. Some of the areas of the house are extremely cold and these do not always correspond to those areas of ice or water damage. In winter, one closet seldom rose above freezing and if the door was left open, the room became quite cold. Windsor finally admitted the insulation was missing and added it there. They a lso admitted that it was missing in the western rim joists and they "stuffed" it up into the areas they could reach with a yard stick. In the areas they couldn't reach, they drilled large holes for it to be blown in, but never returned to do it. The lack of insulation is clearly visible in these holes. The work was done in the Fall of 1977 under threats of legal action by our lawyer. 2. When we started our caulking this Fa11 (1979), we discovered a gap of almost an inch between the sill of the sliding glass door and two of the sheets of siding. The sheets had been cut too short and were the original ones. No insulation was visible. We insulated and nailed a piece of molding over the area. Did this lack of insulation and gap meet code? 3. How safe is the wiring with the amount of water we have in the walls? Could this be part of our electrical problems? 4. The furnace flue has a bad joint seam between the first and second floors. It is a double-wall galvanized pipe and water flows out of the pipe at this point, runs through the wa11s, and into the basement through the joists. The bottom of the furnace is rusted from this. If water can enter the house at this point, what about the fumes from the furnace? Does this meet code? 5. When we used the second floor shower stall, water ran down outside of the sewer pipe into the basement. Windsor did some caulking and the proUlem stopped. Do we have a leak in a sewer? 6. Eight of the thermo pane windows have condensation between the sheets of glass, indicating a lack of seal. Is this a violation.of the energy code? Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Yage 3 7. The house has a sump we11 and drain tiles, both of which are inoperative. The water runs through the concrete block walls, up between the wall and floor joints, and up between the many cracks in the floor. No water runs into the sump well. Are there any Laws or codes governing this? Windsor told us basements in this area are supposed to be wet. 8. The.kitchen exhaust fan flue was blocked for the first six months or so when we moved in. The dirt and grease blew out along all the visible seams with the dirt and sawdust frequently landing in our food on the stove. Should this have passed code? The seams are still quite loose and considerable air blows out of them into the cupboards through which they pass before they enter soffits. We are concerned about this because neighbors in Alabama had their home burnt down when a grease fire on the stove was sucked up hy the exhaust fan and exited through loose joints in the flue pipe. 9. We have problems with a bright blue residue building up on the white sinks and tubs. The Burnsville Water Department came, took scrapings, and had them analyzed. The cause, as closely as we can understand, is a residue of inetal caused by an incompatability or an ion exchange between copper and galvanized water pipe, and they said we would only find the galvanized pipe when it finally corroded through and broke. Is this code? 10. The bannister on the wall going to the second floor was not properly installed and one section fell off. Another railing at the top of the stairs came loose from the wall. Both were repaired but the upstairs railing is somewhat loose as is the lower railing. Since I am partially handicapped and dependent on these railings, we are concerned for my safety. Is this covered by the code? 11. When siding was replaced, a two by four on the second floor fell out, 12. A corner of a double hung_window sash is missing. It was stained, painted, and placed into position in this oondition. About four inches of the frame is missing and this allows the weather to enter. Does this violate code? 13. Over thirty sheets of the exterior rough cedar siding has delaminated; through our lawyer's efforts, these were replaced. Now some of these sheets are also delaminating. They also have a tendency to pull away from the house. This delamination had started before we took possession of the house. Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page 4 As to Mr. Petersons' memo: (enclosure #2) July 13, 1976 - Final inspection made We were to take possession of the house at the end of July, 1976. Windsor said the house was finished, so we arranged for sitters for our children and flew from D.C. to here to sign the final papers. When we arrived we found the house unfinished to the point of being uninhabitable. We refused to sign the papers and returned to D.C. On August 31, 1976 the house sti11 had some forty-four items to be completed, but was habitable so we signed the papers. We are somewhat startled that the last inspection was on July 13, when it was still uninhabitable at the end of that month. March 3, 1978 - Teske's requested a re-inspection March 3, 1978 - Inspection was made, etc. We do not recall the date of request and reinspection, but they were not the same day. Mr. Peterson made the inspection. There are no wet areas at the ceiling lines at the southwest corner of the building. Condensation was ruled out because we do not have a furnace humidifier, only a small portable one, and the attic has all the necessary ventilation. Also we have little ice buildup on the functioning thermo-pane windows in the wintertime. Mr. Peterson was also shown the following defects and to the best of my knowledge he also saw pictures of the missing insulation, and ice on the interior walls. He was shown the water damage on the inside of the exterior north wa11e and ceilings in the living room and hall; the water damage on the inside of the exterior west walls and ceiling in the living and dining rooms. He also saw the water damage on the inside of the exterior north wall of the upstairs north bedroom. Some was caused by water Leakage in warm weather and others by ice and frost in cold. He saw the ceiling damage in the back bedroom and 6ath, and the damage to the floor in that bathroom from the roof leaks. He also saw the loose bannisters, and the holes drilled for insulation that was never installed and the lack of insulation. He said the missing insulation was against code and he would call Windsor. He also said that they were a"nice company". March 3, 1978 - Called Fred Reislus of Windsor, etc. His statement of talking to Windsor is apparently true although I don't lkDow the date. Why didn't he inform them they were in violation of the code? March 3 1978 - Telephone Teske's and informed them of Windsor's position, etc. Mr. Peterson called us back, but not the same day he inspected the house, and informed us of his conversation wi.th Windsor. He said Windsor was not going to fix anything because of the lawsuit. Nothing waS said about the code violation. I do not recall his mentioning too much time had elapsed Mr. Donald Pates 25 November 1979 Page 5 since the final inspection; something was said about it being unusual for him to be recalled to reinspect an occupied house for code violations when it had already passed the inspection. I do not understand his statement nor recall any mention 'that his position had to be the same as Windsor's because too much time had elapsed since his final inspection.' Mr. Peterson said only that we were suing Windsor, therefore they would do nothing. We are now curious about the statute of limitations. Our lawyer, James Roban, had a meeting with Mr. Peterson and was told there were no code violations, even though Mr. Peterson told me the missing insulation was in violation. Mr. Rohan could supply this date. Sometime during that summer or the following spring When the wall leakage had become very severe and the caulking would not last more than three to six months, and the basement leakage was also quite severe, I called Mr. Peterson back to see if he had come across these problems before and/or knew of a solution. I also wanted to check on the code for these and for the siding. He seemed startled that the situation still existed and thought it had been taken care of. He returned and looked at the house and the interior damage. On one of his visits he had another man with him. I either showed or wanted to show him the leaks using the hose, because it wasn't raining. The hose was unacceptable to him because he said it was water under pressure and any or most houses would leak with a hose turned on it. He said he had never heard or seen anything like it, but if we didn't stop the leakage we would ruin the insulation. I asked if he could check into it to see if he had heard of any solution, particularly if nailing a heavily painted and caulked board over the Z strip (where we had located one area of leakage) and recaulking it would help, pur insurance company had suggested this as a temporary means of repair until the siding was replaced. Mr. Peterson said he would check into it and get back to me. He never did. I attempted to reach him several tives thereafter but he was either out or busy and he never returned my calls. Gradually I became aware that when I asked if Mr. Peterson were in, the secretary would say yes, but when she found out who was calling, he was out. Late September - early October 1979 I insisted on speaking to Mr. Yeterson and said that I refused to be put off any longer and wanted to hear from him. (All I wanted was to find out whether the board over the Z strip would work or if he had come across an easy solution). Later in the day I either called back or was called back by his secretary. I was told that Mr. Peterson had spoken to me before and wouid not speak to me again. October 10, 1979 - Teske's called Mayor Murphy, etc. I do not recall phoning Mayor Murphy until the following week; if I did it was merely a general conversation about the problem. I know I spoke to him the week after October 16, probably October 17 or 18. Mr, Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page 6 Approximately October 15, 1979 I called the City Attorney, a Mr. Hauge, as a private citizen to see how one went about getting building code enforced. He asked why. I. explained our problem, emphasizing we didn't wish to involve our City in a civil suit, we just needed our insulation and who was responsible for enforcing the code. He answered that as long as there was a civil suit pending, the city didn't like to get involved, Mr. Hauge proceeded to launch into a vitrialic verbal attack on our attorney. He said he would only speak or do business with our attorney, refused to discuss anything with me, and ended the conversation. I immediately called our own attorney to see if he would speak with the City Attorney and related to him vry conversation with Mr. Hauge. Mr. Roban said that: 1. As a private citizen I had the right to discuss this with our City Attorney. He said he did not need to and it would only run up our legal fees unnecessarily. 2. By his speaking with the Attorney, it could be construed as an attempt to draw the City into the suit which was not what we wanted nor in[ended. I then called two different legal experts to check into our lawyer's handling of the case to see if any of the City Attorney's charges were valid. Neither knew or had heard of Mr. Roban. Both agreed with his handling of the case. The only point they could find any fault with was his taking Windsor's attorney's word that settlement was reached, but that such agreements 6etween attorneys were not uncocmion. One laughed and said he bet Mr. Roban would never take that attorney's word again. October 16, 1979 I had read articles in the paper and seen reports on television about the State Energy Department and in an energy crisis felt that perhaps they might know what to do, So I spoke to a gentleman there who explained that the State wrote the codes but that it was up to the municipality to enforce them. The gentleman questioned me closely about the problem, when the house was built, etc. He said the law governing the insulation was written in January, 1976 and since the house was built after that, it fell under that law, and may very well be in violation. This is the first time we realized that the code was a law. He referred me to your office. October, 1979 Teske' Division and wanted an Division stated their Mr. Donald Pates 25 November 1979 Page 7 October 16 or 17, 1979 I called your department and spoke to a Mr. Hendrickson. I explained my problem; he further explained the laws and said you could only inspect tte house at the invitation of the City to determine if it was actually in violation. I explained to Mr. Hendrickson that Mr. Peterson and Mr. Rauge, the City Attorney, refused to speak to me, so how could I get permi.ssion. He suggested I write a letter to Mr. Peterson requesting State Inspection and he also gave me your address. Also, he suggested I speak to the Mayor to see if he would sign or direct Mr. Peterson to sign the permission. He expressed general curiosity about the delamination, leaks, and interior frosting, and thought it would be interesting to see it because it puzzled him. At no point in the conversation did say an inspection "would be pointless as too much time had elapsed and too many changes cw ld have been made," as Mr. Peterson claims. October 17 or 18, approximately Z called Mayor Murphy and requested permission for the State to inspect the house. I explained our prohlem and that neither Mr. Peterson or Mr. Hauge would speak to me. I assured him that we had, as citizens of Eagan, no desire to involve our City in a civil suit but merely to determine what had gone wrong with the house and whether it met code. Also, if it did meet code, perhaps the City should take a second look at the code to protect its citizens. He said there was to be a"private Council meeting" that night, and he would bring it up. He didn't think the request unreasona6le but felt he needed to check into it first before making the request to the State. He asked me whom he should contact; we joked about trying to find one's way through the maze of government offices. I didn't have the information handy so I called him back with the address, and he asked me to drop it to him in the mail. I did. October 19, 1979 I wrote the enclosed letter to Mr. Peterson requesting a State Inspection (see enclosure #3). October 22, 1979 I wrote the enclosed letter (enclosure A) to Mayor Murphy with the address he requested. I alerted your office that I had spoken to the Mayor and to watch for that letter or any indication that permission would he forthcoming. I apoke either to Mr. Hendrickson or Mr. Sanders and that gentleman said he would watch, so that when you received the Letter you would know to what it was referring. Week of October 22, 1979 We received the enclosed letter (enclosure #5) from Mr. Peterson, dated October 19, 1979. ? Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page 8 Week of October 22, 1979 (continued) We were unable to determine whether it was a denial for State Inspection or a response to our desire to speak to him, or a response to my phone ca11s to the City Attorney or the Mayor. Note that the letter to us has no mention of code violation; nor does it make any reference to that part of Mr..Peterson's memo to yw dated March.3, 1979, which states: phone call to Teske "that too much time had elapsed since my final inspection" therefore he couldn't do anything - a statement he never made to us. And it is in'complete contradiction of his claim in the memo to you that "his position (was) not to interfere until legal claim was settled". In his letter he flatly refuses to do anything. 9ctober, 1979 - BuildinQ Code Division cal}ed me for historv of Teske's home, etc. Is this correct? October, 1979 - Received a letter from Teske's requestinQ a State Inspection (see The date on this letter was October 19, 1979. Mr. Peterson either received it after he wrote his letter of October 19, or wrote his Letter of October 19, 1979 later than that date, As I mentioned above, this statement of his position is a complete contradiction of his actual letter to us and his earlier, March 3, 1978, portion of the memo. Nwember 8, 1979 I had not heard from Mayor Murphy so I called him back. He said he had been busy in the fields, and with his re-election, hadn't gotten arwnd to it, and had forgotten it. He said he lost the election on November 6 and was no longer Mayor. Mrs. Bea Blumquist was now Mayor and she would have to sign the permission. I expressed surprise that she could do anything before her taking office in January, but he said she was taking over and it was her job. Mayor Murphy gave me her phone number. I called Mrs. Blumquist who was horrified that Mayor Murphy should even suggest that she was to sign anything or do anything official before she was sworn in in January. She said it was illegal; to call him back and tell him so. She also referred me to the City Administrator, Tom Hedges and told me to call the Councilmen. She said she would sign the request as soon as she took office if all else failed. She also said she would bring it up at a meeting November 13, 1979. I recalled Mayor Murphy and informed him of Mrs. Blumquist's stand. He said he would have to check into our problem and that we could appear before the Council on November 20, 1979 if I wished. I said yes. Mr, Donald Pates - November 25, 1979 Page 9 November 9, 1979 I called City Administrator Tom Hedges as Mrs. Blumquist suggested, explained the problem and the situation. He was quite surprised at Mr. Peterson's and Mr. Hauge!s attitude and said he would look into it. x told him I was going to write to each Councilman for permission for the State to inspect the house; and also in an open letter to the Editor of the Local newspapers ask the City Councilmen for this permission. He told me Mr. Peterson was off for the week and would I please not contact the papers until after he spoke with Mr. Peterson on the following Tuesday. I agreed. November 10, 11, and 13. 1979 - Calls to Citv elected officials City Attorney, City Administrator, and Mavor-elect. Who made these calls? Mr. Peterson? I spoke to Mr. Hedges November 9 who told me Mr. Peterson was off and Mr. Hedges couldn't speak to him until November 13 about this. I spoke to the Councilman and the Mayor- elect November 10, 11, and 12. I did not speak to the Mayor since November 8, and the City Attorney had refused to speak with me further, weeks earlier. November 10, 11, 12, 1979 I called each Cquncilman. All but one saw nothing wrong with the request. Councilman Smith asked for a copy of the letters to Mr. Peterson and Mayor Murphy and said he would bring it up at the meeting on November 13, 1979. November 12, 1979 I spoke to Mr, Hedges. He said he had spoken to Mr. Peterson and that Mr. Peterson had called your office and given his permission for the State Inspection. I told him I was given to understand a letter was needed and who had Mr. Peterson spoken to in your office. He left the phone and I heard him ask Mr. Peterson whom he had spoken to; I didn't hear the reply. When Mr, Hedges returned to the phone, he said Mr. Peterson had spoken to Dwayne Grace. He also said that if your office had told me the request needed to be in writing, it would be done and requested the address. I told him it was in the formal request I had written to Mr. Peterson earlier and gave it to him again: Mr. Hedges then wanted me to meet with Mr. Peterson in his office at ll a,m. the next morning. I expressed my apprehension but agreed. Then Mr, Hedges made a casual remark that Mr. Peterson would call Mr. Grace "today or tomorrow". Yet he had clearly stated at the opening of the conversation that Mr. Peterson had called your office and given permission: This made me quite suspicious. I called your office as soon as I finished my conversation with Mr. Hedges. Mr. Sanders was then in the oPfice. I related my conversation with Mr. Hedges to him and asked if such a call had been made. He found Mr. Grace and asked him. He reported that Mr. Grace had not spoken with Mr. Peterson for weeks. Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page LO November 12, 1979 (continued) I spoke to Mrs. Blumquist just hefore she left for the Council meeting where Councilman Smith and she intended to bring up the subject. I related to her what Mr. Hedges had said, that your office had not received the call. I told her of the upcoming meeting the next day and expressed my apprehension about it. She said it was unnecessary for me to be put through such a confrontation. I asked if a request for a meeting in public before the Council would be out of order. She did not think so. Before the meeting Mr. Hedges told Mrs. Blumquist and Councilman Smith that it was useless to pursue the letter of permission because your office would not or could not inspect the house before the civil suit date of December 10, 1979. They assumed he knew a point of law they did not, and did not pursue the matter that evening. Where did Mr. Hedges get this information? This is not what your office had told me, and as I later discovered no one called your office from the City until the afternoon of November 14, 1979, the next day: November 14 1979 - Discussed situation with Citv Attornev and State Buildine Code Division. Correct. That afternoon. The first thing that morning I called Mr. Hedges and again expressed my fear of a private meeting with Mr. Peterson. I asked that it be in public before the City Council. He said it could be arranged for November 20, 1979. I also told him Mr. Grace had not spoken to Mr. Peterson in weeks. Mr. Hedges became huffy and said that he had told me Mr. Peterson would place the call yesterday or today and that Mr. Peterson had spoken to Mr. Grace about the situation weeks ago. Did he? That afternoon your office called to tell me Mr. Peterson had just called and given permission for the State to inspect the house, but only after December 10. This meant that I would now need the signature of more than one Councilman or the Mayor and complicated the issue even further. I called Mrs. Blumquist to tell her of Mr. Peterson's permission to let the State in but only after December 10, and she then told me of Mr. Hedge's statement of the previous evening that you couldn't enter the house before court date. However, to my knowledge, since no one at the City had contacted the State at that point on November 13, and no one at the State level.had ever made any such indication to me in any way, I couldn.'t understand the source of Mr. Hedge's information. Neither could she. I called Councilman Smith to tell him of Mr. Peterson's phone call to the State, Mr. Hedge's conversations with me, and my conversations with your office. He was disturbed because the stories obviously didn't match. He said he would talk to your office himself, and if I were telling the truth, he would walk over from his office and sign the permission for you to enter th e house. ,01 Mr. Donald Pates November 25, 1979 Page 11 - - November. 15, 1979 I called Mr. Sanders and informed him of Councilman Smith's intentions. ? Councilman Smith spoke to Mr. Pates that day. November 16, 1979 Mr. Pates spoke to me about his conversation with Councilman Smith. He said he would need to check into it further and would call me back the following 1uesday before we were to appear before the City Council. Councilman Smith told me he directed the City to write the letter giving the State Inspection before December 10. November 18, 1974 Councilman Wachter called us to make sure we knew we were on the agenda for NovemUer twentieth and that it was going to be complicated. November 17, 18 and 19, 1979 A copy of the memo attached to Mr. Peterson's letter to you was sent to the Council. We were apparently not to be shown this iremo or know of it. However, its contents got back to us quite quickly by phone. I saw a glimpse of the first page of this memo at the Council Meeting and told the Council it was highly erroneous. November 20, 1979 We appeared before the City Council. Mr, Hedges said they wanted us first on the agenda. The place, however, was packed for an issue later on the agenda. We were immediately informed that the letter giving the State Inspectors the right to enter the house at any time had been sent. We asked to see a copy, and were shown the letter. We were handed two sheets of paper for a qui.ck look as we spoke and they were taken back from us. We told the Council of our problems with the house and we asked them to enforce the code. The City Attorney advised the Cwncil against it and said we may have removed the insulation ourselves, thereby opening the City to a Lawsuit from Windsor. Windsor themselves removed all the siding that was t wched; it is not a job of which we are capable. The neighbors can testify to this and one was present, who later said he had difficulty restraining himself from saying somethistg at this remark. The City Attorney finally said they would only enforce the code if we won the lawsuit. We were told we had been sent a copy of the letter in the mail. Althwgh mail within this City only takes a day or so we have not received a copy as of November 23. November 21, 1979 We called the City for a copy of the letter so we could study it. The secretary said everyone was out to a luncheon meeting and she did not have permission to give it to us. We told her that the bottom of the letter had Mr. Donald Pates - November 25, 1979 Page 12 November 21, 1979 (continued) a"c.c. Mr, and Mrs, P. H. Teske" on it. She checked and said we could have a copy. My husband, who works near City Ha11, went over to get it, but when he arrived they couldn't find it. He was told all copies were probably in their briefcases from the night before. At 3 p.m. I called back to see if the letter had been faund. It had and a copy was at the reception desk. When I arrived to pick it up, there was only one page, even though the one we had been shown the night before had two pages. I asked for the rest of the letter and was told there was no more. I pointed out the letter contained "Enclosed you will find, etc." so where was the enclosure. The secretary didn't know; Mr. Peterson and his secretary were gone for the day and that was a11 she was authorized to give me, i asked to speak to Mr. Hedges, but he was busy. I said to get him because I could see him chatting in the doorway of a nearby office. She did, I requested ehe enclosures, he produced not one more, as we had been shown, but two more, told her to copy it, and give it to me. It was the memo we weren't supposed to see or know abwt that had been sent to the Councilman over the weekend. I thanked him. I also asked for clarifica- tion of Mr. Peterson's final statement in the letter of my caanting the name of the person at the Building Code Division to call and then calling the wrong person. This statement in Mr. Peterson's letter is entirely untrue. We also find it amusing that this list was compiled by the City Administrator who claimed he knew nothing of the situation before my phone call to him on November 9, 1979. I realize the above must be confusing to you, but I have tried to be as complete and accurate as possible. We feel that the City for reasons unknown to us does not want you to see this house and has gone to unusual lengths to prevent it. They appear to be particularly anxious that you not see it before December 10, 1979, which makes us all the more suspicious. Even stranger, Windsor's attorney called our attorney November 21, 1979, the morning after the Council Meeting, ready to sign the original agreement icmnediately. We learned of this after I spoke to you and had started this letter. We do not know if this is.another trick, as they pulled last February or whether they don't want you in here either. This agreement doesn't cover items we now strongly suspect, as do some construction experts, are in violation of code. So, if we sign it, we're worried that we'll sign away our rights and safety. Please help us and check this house before December tenth. We know it will foul up your schedule, but it would greatly relieve our minds of much worry; and we are extremely worried when the City has made it difficult for you to come into this house and now suddenly the builder wants to sign. Thank you so much for your time and patience. We are so hoping you can help us. Sincerely, Mr, and Mrs. P. H. Teske 2292 Clark Street Eagan, Minnesota 55122 890-7680 ? ?• oUT' p^D'J]C": S9 trU:'. M',"if;[1 :t ...ins f.Yie aYv1`7'?l0^ a}.;7Vt: i`:'JUld wall> P.':, ':t. T.1 _., f,p the ,.::LC it t.it8 'rl:?tc:" Tt:`:i t.P.'_"Oi,i>.:I ii.:e3 i:?:.3: .O^ .'.''_13 O_ t1 - ?:?illC(3 c:J.f:e? i;i ti?a ?t;,ic±A ta t;A b.aaoiznni; arid tiils iLrs rai,aol canr,i:3clr :i;ln Fiint 1'13 j`].33:,t!: 1?1':?:?] tC tiaf' i!1t.2'lUT l117C'JV p"7OU:7(: ;7'ill.',7• IZ1 t.i]!2 w:-;Ler t2 iQl j./'9 f:J_.::'J pIi t:1Q QZXJY•e .^',llC 1?1t'.'.I'.?'.?I' W7?,i9 an?u ?Jl19^b0;i'?:?a• ri':, tii193 tl?,iswP1t9 ay3 :r;t::r 1rij,s tl._+•;,i:,;i?,thc coil.'.aC to ':.hn Cl.Dors bolou. Yhn rid::il, s ro;t,h e0erir.:r CCi.^.S i.ir{60i3, '1C1.;i aY :ilmO.i;i. 3Ll tt:6 'J1nt5p .;!l'Jti:..'1•7G, A:Id CM4:i9. il]iB ._.l1Pg CQrlti,^.:1a].1" r)itl:li".L1[it!i? bIIt t'f1Fi 1d1:8 dO POC ar1:3o :TU:S ti:^Sf1 1S0'l3. ih868 .ZOOS 0.:1:] lI'i:W01' a:'iJ C?:d0;;j;3 OC":•.12' C(: Gnw1T(31V VOI'ti^R: N:Il.lA Wh::PC t.'lOTQ .19 no :n:,^ibi.lity o: 1ar h-c'e up. "_ric: r:io^ ril.so 1ea4, ^n1 ir.s the pls.;tu:•, n:r°. :n otic roo!_: ±?;e i;.onr. 'i7in °lrst :r:nter wf,uoiv ±r, t}.e houao tho don?;lu frait CIOGl': fi:t Bo 3;^..!1lV t.;laj: V"Y:'(it, W:::7 "J.;il.ble3 }7GGLJ":r; : tiir?:7s S!?olv atlr, i^n bl:21.? Di.D t,'.1L' tt)1::;o aiS:I fO^1t)a 3. ?`il/l Or 3;:0n i.`1 tr0 1^bt7f, hn?', l!s tJ 3tUfI' PSgr? 1:;ora, t^}:e i>s.;'c dcor, trh'.r.,`.z is of bliiing gluss, ?ea:s in riIn 30 '? ,.. j } ??'?'-L' L•-it t1 .3 :??A1?Y?L iJL1^'].lC?i.J :i.??i1?i?".. il?l t(J j!)? 1?I:?.i:s 1.n.vln0 the roY)1J• ? i:7C'1-:i f,>.1lf,?J•:?? i".. ?:!uS 4.1'ih,?Uil :.1 .T'-'.:1? ?':le- :? 7 .? .i ? .CC?•1_:.JS..'' S:79U?.:!ti ? CP. tflg bi1: 27:7p,:.g > 1a4n t-"":i .r o^l, - iio:: vas c_ !.i , • , 19.'t?, i I....n? _t.d .: d,i '. ',a in ci _.,? .i:,1: ic 1:. re.r._?:il i,,r._-,s an?a K `ur.-. ._i Lh,?se az•c:r. ?I'ru:h ...r 1:: ::P, J'.1"1C:. SJ.:, F;t: 1`.113 li0 :iC^.li:", iiE .^:;I;.'J::)','.••+ pi 30:33 qi LI:C ..:I.9I11L? CI^?,C A?4:in3, ,. .. . G?..ii3 oC,,C7^... 3-LG1'Y? 1E;;:i cY't'.:e?.,.. ..i?t: ;ii`i:i:., ..-i(` i?Dl:'1(i•N=tt34Rt ,. ,; ., .. , o:' _:t?f,.l.:,ti.On. k!'tor ins ,l^l.lun a*.- . :.ac o?. . . stra::r? ._co bri:idia O'1 ..... ].GtJNO_ pp:1'.0 ..u ...i0::.. R7•9'_1i KJ;1! .. _ n 1. . ^.V,1 ..'?lf ;l'i:'.. iF: t:17t t110 . .':l"1 ?1 y 17'C1. ;;?? .?C? . ,. itl..,.-O .1.' , :11,., •ii:,O i s ?i.r .:.-W' Of i'l.^.11Z'11.:DT:. ??,, _.r ' ?' : .:t- _ •,i l .-;" ? ... r. C 2v. ?:r.c, . ._••, - ,:i.-:;.....c.iy ,_?..' .i.i? 1.hr) .?: t1:;n, .?. t°•J!1n the ._.'?'i .. ....'.?. . .. !.tli3 IOlli'.i7 'iy'^.1:3(•.'y1011:3 c.ill fU" a D7.1.(i 'IJ".LI?.A"il .^+j91.1]:q U:1:li f1U".lp {i8l1p !'_Ct?thCY' O: w':i!:h '_ Wlc'':1JI7. TIC lx'9.ui;_^ I'il.^.A t'iTGl:r"il :.C.e con^rete biOcif l7:1il£ '1Zla -CI-U)$ l.;n t."p,u; _ ti18 a:n, l•T?IL.a i_: ? ? ' , ': t!;o tr..,o...ani f?n^r •.r.cl :una acbna the fl.cr. :L?oU nL .'L: •J".tt? :t:i 'dC .1OVq'1 in :719 :T'19 d.Jf.C(7tvCl j`S t}1G :1q1Y:3 Rild i.1LSIICp?LL9C0 ..i:7 *..7 . •.ir '.:t:e intarr.O ,.na ::i:ia "cr 1;::!t:. iho T.ire ai:.r. ::a:t cPC Troqcon:'.Y, lights :1:ak::r-ci, ;:ni t.he rl:•cuit lxiX --•cuL•i ct:t c+['F. U^.';ats Co:•r.t;,r 31::cCric :'i,iul?;;r L:..co'n t'r.:_ to a.srJ.t. in:;tall..tson of 't:tu :ir.u:.t, uo?: r.ausing _. .., ar;:. :'o no_ ;;L'.il ha•;i:.Z :1.:wiii<:.:1 ,:ro'::l'ns. ' 4t kvQ. ? K yy? . • ? . ?? 1 ??: - X` .r? uy*X?"= y t ?eY.:t YYy` -? \n44f. y - - , • . : ' pa re tsro ? , . . :;.;;;... t.. .. . .. O tl'13 a tJ:'J.eil':i' to U.+'Jk.^.. .FiC ;1L'7e to i•ihy 't9b Di: atr +}29 ?'" • b,t'o.a ;°i soc poo,•l;• r.s ",u lut hat as`: ;a12 into Ll:^> {.f.t, which uacs b?oc'.od b?J Vl11::L wu l`:tf:T d....mU'. :'.`ad to UO t(:v 1!.:^.dUn :Pl':.u ' Toit 1:x }.l1:l'O kli'a^.il Vl'3 f'..ro,,2aco. . tYl!i .lt.l .i.(I : GiC uilO hCt. ,IJ:dlB vt'"i: 91tt1.^.g %IId Y ur.:i: :i? ? o, a :• .i;o?+ ? ?t Da pZ.,f•r1cad, pflpti i ?Fv Ui f'.c' :"0:.,;3. P, nO.L^. ...... ^i'itfC?.Gtj .?.:i20 ?fJ6 ??iy.1CJ;i a,yr f] ::CT7:14`,I'i ?'G dLl.'.R?! L?:3 . . a:?h,.:.. f,J !?:'.???. iiI:.O ..... .K, :`.1t t:n ,:..b2^.!15 Ql'q n!;jl.l iSl uL'1v8 :19 W $'iOEIi'. Of .'- ?_ ? '; ,:er WrO,,.., to . _::.:n- r,:; t,us st; ot. 'F:.;an :',.,•.'..n a,,Q th.is .....::t of •!,r?:, ?,ci .?:_.•.,r,tl; .? e ... . .. _ .:,i .n e' ?c :s?. 7.r, ad1".`ia?i tc i'a•,,;a tcin,;s ?thcre ': ll "Lt1V jJ_L. '^ L`. r?.j,-?. .? .?..a.PB. i'i?r _uji':iv+ ?_..i. ..*i;S 3T',' .S.Il t;t?G' -n,'?, . _ ^.r? {.7 ?.i(.,_l,l.i?? ..n - , c'?"1 + A'.i o.:' t:,:i:; ., ... .. .laii G, f:r::t :fe:xr ti.o i3ou.;e. T:ia:i,or ? - j?,;'_,,,;;>; _., '.t:_• +,i,.. ..,?;..riui• ;? .. . cir., , ..:<, to lx! ??':'?r?rt? ? ,l ir t z Ri:nnte (ti.,,: u1»a :ruoM r::l :o:c to" iiiey aZ o,,.d in t?,is cl .it: u.^c:an.a le:]t _ S. Vi., tii o ., i ar,,, . .. ..: `, ,?), i; ] ? ., . .? .c•o?? 11g1?: b-ii.;,i; ^cl :?t_,;? ?s", ;,i;,s ?rera .. .--o=J':•; ,••:.1 . _. .. !' ?'.Z'.'_;:i . : .?... t7C 5 ?O;'?'L.: i19 oi:l'3 ino-r.Jrat1•<a. The;? :ie3 . c.._.:_ .:('.'l_l.. 2;1.:IC:'UU3 ..,:Cl::;L., W UL1L' O:'..!eii' :T'bbli':,.... :?+_Lii :;Oi::l:: .'::) n v Gl:l.i.N, fi!'iiL'.Ct? L![:!1Ce i'O ?OOs: ?)O:i^35CiJQ OYi Aii[{115u 30 . , 9 ;,r;:it„n.•" 013 i:; a.orr.;., wa uerb '<n 1=nl, o::: ;i:.i,r,y+,ers •ae:s _,.:xc•t_n ..;;iouZ. A' ;.:;lt timn th,3rp wcrc :^.ort.y-.ro-.ti .L':EiL9 qe4 to ba c:ono, . _..ciu-li?j;_ ty„ =l:..__.....:L cf r1rilci? .ielam.!nating siditig. One thouysn3 dollars . •'- . ' lo u crn.; t n al'_ a w::t r:ltnwe, to x1th:.o1c. . any oi' thusc itet;ie uro yut to :•n cn ,.n3 in ^;a _t.:. sc ie r•?p;?i:•y ad-9i!ion<< dcim:i_;o irss ir.f'liato3 co t::o ho?leo - ,b _ _ ._ _., ':r.s :iot b:..•a ; ..,..t •, ci±:,:,r, Wo, a1:.ost sll t}:o co.^.•3cti3r.s tin.1L 3 .n.i:, nr1.y ,... . ';l,ndc,n; •.t.., thr,.:t,nm^: Yr1t.i? 3of;rLl ?t?A 4. " ir,' ?tt l.u.?;??y . ... ' t'.wD h!.1:^O ,iLn tii: Or.G Yq.it' '.i.'I'C9 t,y, ln lUillRltlrO'? thJ lj,ytr Ur ? ...-C lr n8s lylv . r...._..lil(`d L'^,t0 „OJf.C:I. T:r,P7fC'7^, ;.t t.iiC 113 't p05,? f .Lb] o • . .... ..]Lj :t'1d IS 'Ow ;i'. ¢.::i:^y O'...?.'.:lVeT f.il."i t.l]J BII::?.U$J.^ GLLiL.? .. i 4 :,i. . . t , . ,, t? l. . S. onnn. tin;? uo i«:I: b::+.u;?in Iim?cot, t;eir :aryAT? ? u,.. ',. T i.., o.. ..l ,. .,,v n rc.9 :a L<„v a:c. e`n nnu>e .°or w'at we i,:.id . . f-i _t .. .,. i .a v. . ? f•...n _ .`;- , ir.*.- r:! . nto ' ., .?i t?o rn^..',t::??>p::.-nt :c.« ttis . . i . o. .. _ Li.._ . _ '_ ?_ ' ' S"_a .+L:.z..? ., ..°i;'?';;"f::'.',eI', SCd ;8[id8^._^.pU7 ' f . oy all .7:.. _.:b _ nr .... _ . ...OC:. .:L y`:. fuSi'Q. Tl:o W.:a dii nut ..ou.: Fr:iz• to us nor ._ ,. ,.. .n h .: i '.n 1 , C . :'S 40033 C l 'i'7';i? Ur" . t.12:"USy OCt'L'Ig pel')O?]• , ' i . ,_ ,.?, _ . ...,. nor :•,:;•c: ?.r .3 •? ..._ : ;. ..:t, ar.y r:.: .n ;•, t'zo,n 'riic;door nr theL- .., .. t M7117, _:I . .. ? j it. I.r b.l " Otnl 1 _ alTdtc,3 fc_ .i>i it. ?i:d :1? . .,? y t P :1?? .. ??! i.(':.? .n.? or 1l.i).i?.?l?, ti.y?lily 1?..., a?. F' L'J.?j:? Y31nY .l.1Ca1 mCrv ...i:lq ..ulf .. . u 1 1i'. . 1 1?9iY4' i ` Jf'i'jj. ?!y 1Yr{.V { . v? V . I + .U \??: .? /iJ .?. :i Y: '?)? OT. ?.'/ r?1? /ti• Y14i1 !'unr . . n:'1 . .. ..:'l7 _ uL?: t1.? .?:4:?.. , i.1 ` .., ..:Inl'.n?.f: ..'` ?..?. o?.?r (? nv ??cuLQ ?!?)?. ? nlr...?.._ u,?.y ii1Fr?:Lcibil".1.n.i• Duo i.C... i1.li...o.. in ..TCS• O0s':B1D 0311y wO wkrC- , i:acli-_ ,, b: :i:, ::o.•1•c, cr t:;;:i i::';u .,n.' i+, c.r,a :-otpn:;3•i tD iK:nday mora:£ng •` , r:.ti. r:_ 11, 1979. _,•ir.e ia:.,...;.ir :he cP"ici-;.^ ^f ?Wdsor f9utiily v; sred t;e l.•? ., i:i i,:,o .. ,. ., ? r.:; .,,,?,..,.,,t;; h•,^,,r<? . ,??z•t ^ '?:t;n?t.;,.«?r i.t.rJ??r ^.? •.'O ?Cti?: ? , ?...° .1'.lF;,' ,?)..LI i . ? ... . ]? if LfG ''U_ .. It 7Ci9 8 39::Ii1.0 / l ?•.• ,. n]: .J...U . t:, U R7.OP A.I.+.:l•O, .9.h.i h? ? Ya.'l! :.L'R:7 . t?li-1 Plntl?. ??O f?T(]+? cr:; L _ ? , ? „?;-.. a . . . i ?.i?:.. nn "l,aa 0 nir co":ct d.it t!:c inty:ra 3f:L'a`t y ?.. .J ?i. . . a.J t* ? ? ? fla"".> F'^d ? p2t,mfl thI'R38 . " ' is.?.c ?'r:r. ti•:a tc ;'r::a the i'in::1 ;:r,t i,uo•;;:s :xnd have thora aignied bnro:e ? ?nr ,u:r:•t ;iia.i?^ . ; ._•3, ou ;,1:,. .lc;.;,r_•rs "ahouk .h.?r.dn :inard t's? , ?:?:cir :,,; ,o.ir7,:t. Th.?t ?a?ts tha :cet ue he r.3 ? q '??' e•r . ' t? Pro: d_ne.aAi. 15 in: l ;r o na ti.,? b2:sie, ai..c:d L..a tarne(l. u^ n 1 . i {y? y 4 ? n1 ' J \? :yoi ?? Y?I -Y ??:Z• 4 Uy (?? l? \l? 4 or FO,L, _ u.j. hP 1"Pr.:c j throu?4 rori,,:on Sn t?x nei;;htx:rh_w.ci tl;at ??? , : .:] c?i? , ? , L? • ln ., :• 3 n J-LznQ, ! na3 ? ? J y ucuwtijod r n ? . . t., wr_•<1 nr fi,::e ?,1:se In ? . 11:3 !, : •s,• ':"'n ! , ta , t E.D a,.1tt.'!b Lo ? :a??.? r>? ?, c.. .??v ,?: . t?d i?*? ?.?•.. .r 3? t?4n. it wr,o l; t:l.? . 117? n`:)i!j ::mt o -? . a L,. npLl':'?? . i;!:n ::i•i.t tc ww't to sc.`. i.hut t,:ti•i lz?.i33:,a1 Po :rt+,A :.indEOr vp. Th•, r.ov court d2to Ss ? _ . .. _ .. rJ . . . ' ' . t? Inspection Da[e 12/4/79 Teske Residence 2292 Clark St. Eagan, MN The following items do not mee[ the minimum standards of the State Building Code in effect on April 13, 1976. _ 1. Foam insulation in crawl space is not covered with a thermal barrier as required in UBC Sec. 1717 - As amended in the State Building Code. . 2. A guard rail ie required on the open side of basement stair as per UBC 5ection 1716. 3. Combuatible forming uader fireplace firebox and hearth has not been removed - UBC Sec. 3707 K. -' 4• The duct for 2nd flaor bathroom fan is not insulated as required in SBC 7715(1)(h). 5• The access to garage attic negates the fire sesistive ceiling protection from garage to house. A self closing assembly is required. UBC Sec. 504(d) Exception 4 - b• The "Z" flashing at horizontal plywood joints is not adequate to make them weatherproof. - USC Sec. 1708(b) Minnesota Building Code Division ?u Siver[ Hendrickson I Section Chief-Consultants SH/cj /Y 1 'L?O NfEMO T0: Tom Hedges - City Administrator FROM: Dale S. Peterson - Building Officia? DATE: December 10, 1979 RE: Paul H. Tesk , 22g2 Clark Street State Code Consultant Inspection Sievert Hendrickson of the SBC Division and I perPormed the above inspection Tuesday December 4th, 1979• The inspection took three hours and was quite thorough. There were six code violations, three of which occurred during original construction and three during the time of repair and retrofitting. There is no formal report as yet because Mr. Don Pates, SBC Director, wishes to review the report and has not done so as of this date. Violation #1 Uninsulated Bathroom exhaust vent pipe. Violation N2 Intermediate railing on open side of basement stairs missing. Violation H3 Plywood Porm supporting 1 foot of concrete for Fireplace floor. These code violations are easily overlooked in the 20-30 minute time limit allowed by the workload of this department and do not pose any hazard to the home owner, except in this case the builder forgot to remove the blockage at the ash dump. The SBC Division did an energy calculation and found that even if the insulation was left out where alleged the home still exceeded the code. Slides and pictures taken by Nlr. and Mrs. Teske show that they have a problem with cold spots on parts of their house, but proper construction techniques had been used. Quality control might have been somewhat lacking. Zt would be impossible for my office to place a man on site 100% of the time when there are 300 plus buildings a year being built in Eagan. Especially with only 1.75 men. e p -., - ?e?Gwt'?.? STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION SAINT PAUL BUILDING GOOE DIVISIDN llecemher 11, 1979 Mr. Dale Peterson Building Official City Hali Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Peterson: 408 METftO SOUARE 7TH AND ROHHRT 5T3. 6T. PAUL. MN 55101 Phone: 612/296-4639 At your request, following the request of Mr. 6 Mrs. P.H. Teske of 2292 Clark St., Eagan, Minn., I accompanied you on an inspection of their dwelling on Tuesday, Dec. 4, 1979 at 2:30 p.m. We viewed 18 slides and several color photos of problems associated with the home. Among those problems were frost accumulation on base-boards and in corners of intersecting partitions with exterior walls, absence of insulation when siding was being replaced, water leaks through siding in garage? mqisture thru basement walls and fioors, and water stains at intersection of ceiling and exterior walls. An inspection of the dwelling showed evidence of water leakage in basement walls, floor, and at ceiling at perimeter of wall. Sump basket had approx. 3/4" of water in bottom, with 2" diameter plastic pipes set 3 inches below top of concrete floor. Gravel filled trench noted on drawings would have to be full of water before any would drain in sump - drawings show approx. 3" diameter pipe at a lower level of the gravel hed. The building code does not requi_re a drair tile system or sump. The rim joist on the west wall was partially insulated. There were water stains in several locations at intersection of interior partitions with exterior walls, and at wall/ceiling juncture on both the first and second floors. Some drywall tape was showing evidence of loosening. The ceiling of one bedroom on second floor had several stained areas which appeared to be the result of water. One upper sash in second floor bedroom had a tapered splinter of wood approx. 1/4" wide x 4" long that was missing, adjacent to the weather stripping which allowed some infiltration. Brick moulding and sill extensions on some window frames were loose. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ?,m? O . ?! Mr. Dale Peterson 12/11/79 Page 2 There was evidence of water leakage through flashing at horizontal joints in siding, in the garage area. The flashing evidently is not adequate to provide weather protection. The owner advised that the vertical portion of the flashing (behind upper plywood sheet) was approximately equal Co the exposed portion which is 5/8". We did not remove any siding to verify this. Tfiere was also evidence of water leakage through plywood panels. Several siding panels (rough cedar, reverse board 6 botten design) had been replaced. Some nail spacing on replaced sheets exceeded the minimum spacing required -(6" at edge 6 12" in field of panel) by the code. A large gap under the patio door had been caulked S a moulding installed to prevent infiltration of air. The energy conservation provisions in effect as of Jan. 31, 1976 :equired caulking of all 2xterior joints. An energy calculation is attached to the report indicating the building does comply with the energy conservation provisions of the code in respect to Thermal Transmittance values of walls, ceiling & floors. The calculation are based on absence of insulation in rim joist fi overhang area of the second flocr and rim joist areas of first floor that were not open for inspection. I have also attached a listing of building code non-compliance items. If we may be of further assistance, please contact this office. Yours truly, BUILDING CODE DIVISION ?. Sivert Hendrickaon Section Chief/Consultants SH/cj Enclosure 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMIIVISTRATION SA1NT PAUL BUILOING CODE OIVlS10N December 12, 1979 Mrs. P. H. Teske 2292 Clark Street E3.^yd^, M7!!!:°SQt3 Dear P1rs. Teske: /G'U L)3, 408 METRO SQUAR6 7TH ANU R086RT STS. SL PAUL, MIi 98101 Phona, 612/296-9639 On Monday morning December 3, 1979 we were able to contact Mr. Dale Peterson, certified building official of the City of Eagan to verify a time for inspection of your residence. hir. Peterson said he would be available Tuesday December 4, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. and would call you to confirm the tirne. Mr. Sivert Hendrickson of our office and P4r. Dale Peterson will be at your house as scheduled. Very truly yours, BUILDIN ODE DIVISION ?? Don P tes Di rec or/ DP:p . - cc: JDale Peterson, Building Official AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ?? O BEA BLOMWISi MA\ OR iHOMnS EGAN MARK PARRqNiO JAMES A SMITM lHEODORE WRCHiEP COOFCIL NEMBEP$ CITY OF EAGAN 3196 PILOT KNOB ROAp EAGAN. MINNESOTA 94122 PMONE 05I-9100 Jar.uary 8, 1980 Mr. P.H. Teske 2292 Clark Street Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. and.Mrs. Teske: .•}, THOMAS HEDGES CIIV ApMIN15iHAfUR ALVCE BOLNE CiiV CLE?N It was brought to my attention by the City Administrator that you did not receive a copy of a Letter addressed to my office from Mr. Sivert Hendrickson, dated December 11, 1979, which cited several items which do not meet the minimum standards of the State Building Code. Attached is a copy of that ler_ter for your reference and fi1e. I have sent a letter to Windsor Development Corporation asking that the six (6) items that do not meet the minimum standards of the State Building Code as mentioned in nr. Nendrickson's letter be corrected within thirty (30) days. If you have any questions, please feel free:to contact my office at any time. Sincerely, Dale Peterson Building Inspector DP/hd cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator TME LONE OAK TREE ... THE SVMBOLOF S7RENGTH AND GROWTN IN OUR COMMUNITY. . ---- - - --- - - _ __ .,__ ?--- BEA BLOMpJl$T __ . . . _? ._ --- •'? •, .: 1 . MAVOR i .? . . {y ? '9 'l A "?•?: ? ??} TNOMAS EGNN - . ? MMKPAIPI?N,o - - . ? _ ?w. _ . CtTY OFr;`EAGAN _ " JAMES A$MIfH 1 4 a: 4 - THEOOORE WACHTER . .. .. GOUNCILMEMBERS ...... . PIlOT` NOB RO 3700 ?? `?' N ? ESOTA ..:? ?EA? AN:_MIN ! N? d # } ? • k i Sanuar 8 1980 : k y , . ? 7rypMqS HEOGES CITY ADMINIS1RrliOfl 1 ALYCE eOt1(E - QTY CLERK Mr. John Woodland Windsor Development Corporation Suite 192 4660 West 77th Street Edina, MN 55435 Re: Mr. and Mrs. P. H. Teske Lot 10, Block 5 Dear Mr. Woodland: On Tuesday, December 4, 1979, Mr. Sivert Hendrickson, Section Chief/ Consultants for the State of Minnesota Building Code Division, and I made an inspection of the P.H. Teske residence located at 2292 CLark Street in Eagan. '!{s a result of the inspection, it was determined by Mr. Hendrickson and myself that several items do not meet the minimum standards of the State Building Code in effect on April 13, 1976. They are as follows: 1. Foam insulation in crawl space is not covered with a thermal barrier as required in UBC Sec..1717 - As amended in the State Building Code. 2. A guard rail is required on the open side of basement stair as per UBC Section 1716. 3. Combustible forming under fireplace firebox and hearth has not been removed - UBC Sec. 3707 K. 4. The duct for 2nd floor bathroom fan is not insulated as required in SBC 7715(1)(h). 5. The access to garage attic negates the fire resistive ceiling protection from garage to house. A self closing assembly is required. UBC Sec. 504(d) Exception 4. 6. The "Z" flashing at horizontal plywood joints is not adequate to make them weatherproof. - UBC Sec. 1708(b). v ? THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTN IN OUR COMMUNITY City of Eagan Re: P.H. Teske Property January 8, 1980 Page Two Please observe and make these corrections within thirty (30) days and notify this office when the corrections are completed. If you have any question°s regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Dale Peterson Building Inspector DP/hd cc: Mr. and Mrs. P.H. Teske Mr. Sivert Hendrickson, Section Chief/Consultants, State of.Minnesota Building Code Division ?J , f/. ? 6A /G • S' BEA BLOMIXIIST .. MAYOR ? THOMASEG4N MARK PARRpNTO CITY OF EAGAN Jr1ME5 F. SMITH . THEODOPE WACHTER 3794 -PILOT KNOB ROAD. COUNCa MEMgEqS - EAGAN. MINNESOTA. ? 33122 r . PIIOME ?S?-0toD ' . f ? ( ? s .. January 21, 1980 ' \?P4? • ?? Mr. John Woodland Windsor Development Corporation Suite 200 6100 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, MN 55438 Re: Mr. and Mrs. P.H. Teske Property Lot 10 Block 2292 Clark Street, Eagan Minnesota Dear Mr. Woodland: THOMAS HEDGES C11Y ADMINISTRPiOF pIYCE BOLKE CRY CLERh On January 8, 1980, we sent the enclosed letter to your Edina address. It was returned to us in today's mail with the notation "Adressee Unknown Return To Sender". After checking, we are now sending this letter to the above address by certified mail. The letter stipulated that the listed corrections be made within thirty (30) days. Since the letter did not arrive pcomptly, this time limit will be extended to thirty (30) days from the receipt of this letter as noted upon the certified m ail return receipt. If you have any questions regardin,g this matter, please feel free. to contact me at any time. Sincerely, / Dale Peterson Building Official DP/hd cc: Mr, and Mrs. P.H. Teske 0 TME LONE OAK TREE ... THE.SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. February 6, 1980 Mr. Dale Peterson, City of Eagan DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Building Inspector 3795 Piiot Knot Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Peterson, ? O This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on January 29, 1980, in regards to the letter Mr. Woodland received about the minimum standards of the State Building Code at Mr. & Mrs. P.H. Teske's property. As we discussed, item num6er (6) the "Z" flashing at horizontal plywood joints is not adequate to make them weatherproof - UBC Sec. 1708 (b), will be taken care of under the Agreement Settling Lawsuit, between Windsor Development and Mr. & Mrs. Teske, in the spring af 1980. The remaining 5 items are being scheduled for correction and I will contact you upon completion. Sincerely, WINDSOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Bonnie Wight ? Customer Service Coordinator BW/le cc: Mr. & Mrs. P.H. Teske Mr. Sivert Hendrickson Section Chief/Gonsultants, State of Minnesota Building Code Division. W 6100 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55438 • PHONE (61 2) B31 -071 7 ??? 9 ? T0: DALE PETERSON, BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: DOUG REID, ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL s? DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1980 SUB7ECT: TESKE RESIDENCE, 2292 CLARK ST. (PARCEL # 10 64400 100 OS) EAGAN, MN. On Wednesday, October 22, 1980, I made an inspection of the Teske residence to check for compliance of the six items that were listed 12/4/79 in a memo from Sivert Hendrickson, Section Chief-Consultants, Minnesota Building Code Division. All items were in compliance and acceptable with the Teske's. cc - Mr. & Mrs. Teske S'vert Aendrickson rcel File Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator BEA BLOMQV IST MAYOH THOMASEGAN MARK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMIiH THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS March 30, 1981 MRS PAUL TESKE _2292 .T.ARK EAUAY N 55122 Dear Mrs. Teske: , CITY OF EAGAN 9797 PILOT KNOB ROAD -i " EAGAN. MINNESOTA 53122 . PMONE 4u-6100 .,: " ? j z?.. ... . r. . ? ,.. 1l ??pvt F /o (o LjC{a o `Oo 2nS ? ]ZCO£r ?Ii (ls `j4THOMASHEDGES CITY ADMINISiMiOP EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLEPK Enclosed is a copy of a letter that I was asked to return to you by the Chairman of the Planning Commission. If you want the City of Eagan to retain this letter for its permanent file, please provide me a copy or the original at the City Council meeting on Apri1 7, 1981. Sincerely, ?k.Qmo"? Q4"Cr? Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd Encl. THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITV. 4 • t , . .. . -. `_? __? aDnf _.tvan._t _yoe. fct bv?ld a raa?/ ?nxbe eo??se. _ ki-ds w+1_/._.nc?_be` aAte ?•?'(/ ---; cw 4 -- i . . ri e o"i_ b, Ve---! _ ?.?n. nct pJ?' - t 1,w. s tr•. *j. We tw-,' a /s, hav e -rG - SQ:I (c??? _.; 1?? Gr ? tc, . G/cs s: '?-/d? 3t? ? b e c.a4 ? ? ?? ?? r? •,1?' / : bt ..._..so W114ch . Prev foL,. ! ? +a pqrh ? . ? - -- ; I r? ?+e ? . -- a ' ?. __....?._.__.. .___ V.._.? ,-. .?M. ? .. ? . ro'r'? • ' ? ? _ C_ - , ? --- -- _:? _ ? -'p'? -K. • ` ?? ' >? _ .. ?3 ,...?-._..` - _. ? -? ; M??,?iU -'dool _-- . ? . . , .__ .... - ? o ? _-? - - . . _- ? ? , . 'tiB , ,i J • ? •?? 1? 3Er k ? Clty OF 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MtNNESOTA 55127 PHONE: (612) 454$100 October 26, 1982 CE 2 2 ST EAGANCARK MN 5 122 Dear Mary: BEA BLOAAOUIST raava THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SAAITH JERRV iMOMAS THEpDORE WACHTER Cwnea Memcers TF10MA5 HEDCE$ Gry Atlmnsftata EWENE VAN OVEReENE GN C? We spoke on the telephone today about several concerns you have which relate directly and indirectly to your neighborhood. I appreciated your telephone call and was able to review with City staff and other persons some of your concerns and would like to share some of those findings with you. Regarding City Council action of Tuesday, October 5, at which time I was directed to correspond or meet with Zachman Homes and Mid America Pipeline Company relative to the excavation of the roadway and concerns about the buried gas transmission line, I chose to delegate this issue to the Director of Public Works as it relates to an engineering issue. The Director of Public Works held a meeting on Tuesday, October 19, at which time City officials, officials representing Zachman Homes, a representive of Mid America Pipeline Company and representatives of Minnegasco were in atten- dance. For your information, I have included a copy of a memorandum that provides comment to the City Council about the issue that was addressed by you before the City Council at the October 5, 1982 meeting. Regarding the berm that was guaranteed by MnDOT and assured by the City of Eagan, after checking with both the Director of Public Works and a MnDOT official, the dirt hauling has resumed and the berm is being re- shaped to meet the original elevation agreed to by the City and MnDOT. I have also spoken with the City's health officer and they will initiate action through the state health office if more medical information is provided to their office for review. As we stated on the telephone, it would be beneficial to the City if Karen Kennedy, Dick Decker, Reverend Stockard and you could provide letters of inedical discovery from each of your respective doctors to this office and the same will be given to the City's health officer. If there is reason for further concern, that information will be provided to the Minnesota State Heatth Officer. We are certainly hopeful that the medical findings will be found to be coincidental For the sake of your neighborhood and other neighborhoods in both the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan in that general vicinity. THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL AND GROWTH IN WR COMMMiY . . r •' '? ? i. , City of Eagan/Mary Teske Octobec 26, 1982 Page Two The trees are to be trimmed by the Park Department and it will be scheduled within the next two weeks, or sooner if work program ming permits. This relates to the final trim ming of trees that were removed by the power com- pany during site construction work. Regarding the sign that was approved for Naegele Company, the City In- spection Department will work to assure the neighborhood that the sign will conform to, all City ordinance requirements. lf a representative of River Hills 9th would like to review . the ordinance requirements and height of the sign with the Chief Building lnspector, those arrangements will cer- tainly be coordinated. I will continue to monitor various actions that apparently have not been complied with to date. If you are aware of any further concerns regarding health problems caused by dust in the area, please notify me immediately. Zachman Homes has been specifically noticed by the Director of Public Works to provide sufficient w atering to control dust to the best extent feasible, considering the nature of the operations, in conformance with City ordinance practices. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Hopefully, they can be resolved to your satisfaction'. ? *(Jkr Thomas L. Hedges City Administratoc Sincerely, C\Z?4? TLH/hnd Enclosure , Rn: THONfAS L. HEDCES, CITY ADMINISTRA_mpR FRCM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECIC)R OF PiIBLIC WORKS pATE: OCIOBER 20, 1982 RE: CIIdN1MON RID(',E 3RD ADDITIODI - GRADINC; pPERATIQNS/CAS PZPELIiIES At 1:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 19th, a meeting was held on Fletcalf Drive under the NSP pv.ver ljm. Those in attendanoe at the meeting were as follows: Nw^E REPRESFNTIIQG Thomas A. Colbert Citv of Eagan Rich Hefti. Citv of Eagan Jeri1' Bourdon City of Eagan (Consulti.ng Fngineer) Leo Paw-elskY Citv of Eagan (Consulr; *+; ??Z? Jim Zadvnan Zaclvnan Hanes Demis *'larhula Zachman Hrnies (Consulting En4ineer) C'hudc Poplar Zachman Hrnies (Consulting Pat MurphY Zachman Hrnies (Grading?Corr tractor) Ron Faalkes Mid-Psnerican Pipeline Co. (MAPCO) William Kal.lberg Minnegasco (Panaqer of Engi- ?'-r?4) John Melchesedec.k Minnegasw (Field Engineer) The purpose of this meeting was to have all individuals involved with thiS PartLcular develounent meet on the site to discuss the oPesation- al procedures as it affects the buried Ptinnegasco tran4,,,; Gsion line and Mid-Anerica Pipeline Co.'s gas transnission line. Approxiriately tc.o c-ieeks ago, M7tPCY) pexsonnel physically uncoverec:, exposed and located their un- dexcjround transmission li.ne as it crosses Netcalf Drive. The location of this gas main was detPSmined to be well outside the boundaries of the development operatioits of the Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. Representa- tives fran the City of Eagan, the developer and the City's mntractor wexe all pxesent at that time to witness the actual location of the pipe- line. Subsequeritly, several additional abovrground location marl:ers have been placed showinq the exact location of this aas line. The Northern Dlatural gas line which transcrresses thtinuqh the Cinnar+on Ridge Addition has been tal;en over by the Minneqaso Co. P4innegasoo per- sonnel have physically deterniined the locati.on and ciepth of this pipe- line at several locations as it progresses throur,h this subdivision. .,. _ ._ . _.. . _..... _ _ . .. -. < . _ - : . . ?. . . _. _..,.. , ,?..._:_ .. ._,b.. _.,._?.._ Thaoas L. Hedges Cinnamon Ridge 3xri Addition - C,rading Operations/Gas Pipelines October 20, 1982 Page two Reprnsentatives of the Gity, the developer and the Gity's oontractor have been present when this pipeline was physically exposed. In adcii,ti,on, t4innr gasco will provide their own excavating crews ta pNpoSa their pipeline any r;*+p oonstruction work will be inwlved i.n the nPar vicinity. Also, they have placed additional above-qmtu-id r.rerker sicros referencing the exact lo- cation and have oontinually replaced these through the wnstructi.on opera- tions. At this meti.ng, both the pipeline rr,,,par; es were asked if they felt at anY time there was a hazardous sitvation with the oonstsuction activities as it relates to their respective pipelines. 7'heir response indicated that they felt there was yeiy qood =Mamication and ooordination of cvn- stsuCtion activities and that at rro time did they feel that the existing operation created a hazardous situation to theis pipelinp or the surmund- ing ocnmimity. It was deternuned that the Mirmegasw pipeline will be the cnly one that wi.ll be affected by the constructicm operations of the Cinnamn Ridge de- velogment. The MAPCti gas Line has been detPSmi.ned to be outside the am- struction boundaries of any phase or aspect of the Cinnamvn Ridqe project. All nar*ies were ranizided.to continue with their open lines of om:imica- tion to i.nsure that eveiyone associated with the develogrent is )aiavledgr able about any aperation that may affect their particular situation. As a result of this meeting, it is my opinion that the construction cper- ations are being perfoaned in a safe, efficient and propPS m3.,ier an3 there should be no reason for alazm or croncesn by the existing residents of the River Hills 9th Subdivision or the future residents of the Cinna- mon Ridge Subdivision. I would like to extend my appreciation to all pa*+;es inwlved for their oooperation in helping to define potentiai hazanlous opesations and their ability to handie thaiiin a pmfessional and safe mazmes. If the City Coimcil would Like any further mnfirmation of the operation- al procelure pertaining to the deveioixnent of the Cirmamn Ridge Addition and its irrpact on existing utilities, I will he happy to address those specific concerns if they are foxwarded to my attPntion. TPC/jach cc - All individuals attendvng ,-?\ FERMIT ? CITY OF EAGAN S$30 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 (612) 681-4675 SITE ADDRESS: P.I.N.: 10-64400-100-05 DESCRIPTION: PERMITTYPE: suxLosNe Permit Number: 0 3 Z 7 6 6 Date Issued: @ a/ 0 3 J 9 8 2292 CIARK ST LOT: 100 BLOCK: 5 RIVER HYLL5 97H REROOF BuiL'ding Permit Type Building'Wqrk 7ype Census Cade ` ? ? STORM DAMA6E REPATR 434 ALT. RESIDENTTAL REMAPE-ROOF DUE TO STORM DAMAGE. FEE SUMMARY: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: - Applican TESKE PAUL 2292 CLARK ST EAGAN MN (651)890-7680 55122 T hereBy acknnwled'ge that S have read thi;s application and state that the information 3s cbrredt artd agree to comply wlth all applicable State qf Mn. Statutes and City of Eagan Ordfnanc-es. L APPUCANT/PERMITEE SIGNATURE .... _ _ .. . , . ?SUED BY: SIGNATU RE? J . 1998 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (RESIDENTIAL) ' CITY OF EAGAN ?? 3830 PII.OT KNOB RD - 55122 681-4675 New Construetion Reauirements ? 3 registered sde suneys ` • 2 copies of plans (inGude beam & window sizes; poureO fnd. tlesign; etc.) ? 7 energy wlculations • 3 copies of tree preservation plan rf IM platted after 711l93 required: _ Y s _ No DATE: ? DE CRIPTION OF W STREET ADDRESS: RemodeVReaair Reauirertrents ? 2 mpies of plan • 2 eRe surveys (exterior addRions 8 deeks) ? 1 energy calwlations for heated addRions LOT: BLOCK: ? SUBD./P.I.D. 1-21' Name: Phone #: PROPERTY 1.sst Firsi OWNER Street Address:, ?/9Z City ?l,?G/liyG State: Zip: Company _ Phone #: CONTRACTOR Street Address: License # Ciry State: Zip: ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER Company: Phone #: Name: Registration tl: Street Address: City State: Zip: Sewer 8 water licensed plumber (new construction only): and lot change is requested once permit is issued. Penally applies when address chang I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the infortnation is correct and agree to compry with all applicabl State of MinnesoW Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Signature of Applicank OFFICE USE ONLY Certificates of Survey Received _ Yes _ No Tree Preservation Plan Received - Yes _ No _ Not Required ? -1 -1 CONSTRUCTION COST; 0 v '- 2oo6RESIDENTIAL MECHANICAL rERNUT AreLicaTioN City Of Eagau 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 Please complete for: single famiiy dwetlings & townhonxs/condos when permits are required for each unit ?30 : s o ' Date10/ Site Address Unlt #_ Property Owner Telephone # { t?q Contractor stnerAaa?esa city l? , State AAI) Zip ?r? Telephone # Bond #: Expires: The Applicant is ^ Owner ?Contractor _ Other Add-on or alterstion to existing dwelling unit ?fumace ,_Addltional ^Reptacement _ New ? 30.00 air exchanger air conditioner heat pump other State Surcharge D??? LS f I $ ,50 Tots? cr 5 Zoas r s? I hereby appFy for a Residcntial Mechanical Permit and acknowledge that the information is completr, and accurate; tliat the work will be in conformance with the ordinancos and codes of the Ciry of Eagan and with the Mechanical Codes; that 1 undersiand tliis is not a permit, but on an epp?jcation Yor a permit, and work is not ro start wiFhout a rmit; that the work will be in accnrdsnce with the approved pi ' the se of ork which requGes a review and approval of plan Applicant s Printed Naine A 1 ' `"V pp cants Signature ? PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA119786 Date Issued:12/18/2013 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 2292 Clark St Lot:10 Block: 5 Addition: River Hills 9th PID:10-64400-05-100 Use: Description: Sub Type:Fireplace Work Type:Gas Insert Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Improvements to the home may require smoke detectors in all bedrooms. Chimney / flue must be inspected prior to concealing. Carbon monoxide detectors are required by law in ALL single family homes . Valuation: 3,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $3K $88.50 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $3K $1.50 9001.2195 $90.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Paul H Teske 2292 Clark St Eagan MN 55122 Hearth and Home Technologies 2700 N. Fairview Ave Roseville MN 55113 (651) 638-3309 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature Date: City of Eap 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 r Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use 2 t Permit #: ) i S “T0 Permit Fee: (v3_ Date Received: VC (10/)y Staff: 2014 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION kiHr_ Resident/ Owner Type of Work Name: Site Address: Address / City / Zip: 14,4 Applicant is: Owner V Contractor Description of work: Construction Cost: Contractor Company: Address: 7 State: Zip: Phone: �fi4 ✓9Y27' mail: it. -r-36 3 3"; "./l '' 044 417 License #: 8C 2”1// Lead Certificate #: V� Multi -Fa y Building: (Yes / No If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) i IL COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: Mechanical Contractor: Sewer & Water Contractor: Phone: Phone: Phone: NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.orq I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota State days of permit issuance. V oe Applicant's Printed ame x Applic ilding Code must be completed within 180 to e v %s92' `l Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES Foundation Fireplace Porch (3-Season) Exterior Alteration (Single Family) Single Family Garage Porch (4-Season) Exterior Alteration (Multi) Multi Deck Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) Miscellaneous 01 of _ Plex Lower Level Pool Accessory Building WORK TYPES New Interior Improvement Siding Demolish Building* Addition Move Building Reroof Demolish Interior Alteration Fire Repair Windows Demolish Foundation Replace Repair Egress Window Water Damage Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION Valuation Occupancy MCES System Plan Review Code Edition SAC Units (25%_ 100%_) Zoning City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump # of Units Square Feet PRV # of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Meter Size: Footings (Deck) Final / C.O. Required Footings (Addition) Final / No C.O. Required Foundation HVAC _ Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test Roof: _Ice & Water _Final Pool: _Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final Framing Drain Tile Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test _Final Siding: _Stucco Lath _Stone Lath _Brick Insulation Windows Sheathing Retaining Wall: _ Footings _ Backfill _ Final Sheetrock Radon Control Fire Walls Erosion Control Braced Walls Other: Reviewed By: , Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies TOTAL Page 2 of 3 PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Building Permit Number:EA125388 Date Issued:07/22/2014 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 2292 Clark St Lot:10 Block: 5 Addition: River Hills 9th PID:10-64400-05-100 Use: Description: Sub Type:Reroof & Siding Work Type:Replace Description: Census Code:434 - Zoning: Square Feet:0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:Please print pictures of ice and water protection and house wrap and leave on site. When installing ventilated soffit material, remove existing material (i.e. debris that could block vents) and take steps to ensure maximum ventilation to attic. Call for final inspection after installation. Valuation: 8,000.00 Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $8K $162.25 0801.4085 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $8K $4.00 9001.2195 $166.25 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Paul H Teske 2292 Clark St Eagan MN 55122 (651) 890-7680 Ryan Windows & Siding Box 5937 Rochester MN 55903 (507) 281-6363 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature Use BLUE or BLACK Ink ---------, � For Office Use � • ' L��to 85 � �� 1J�� Permit#: �, I 15J� • �� Permit Fee: � 3830 Pilot Knob Road � � Eagan MN 55122 RE(r+El�.'t'!� I Date Received1� ` o�� ' � —�7 � Phone: (651)675-5675 � � � Fax: (651)675-5694 OCT 1 ti [U15 , �ta�`-_=____ ��_��_J 2015 RESiDENTfAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: �-� � �- SiteAddress o?v2�v�-� ��.(��'`�� 7 � Tenant: Suite#: '�� Phone:�.5-/- ��/�- 7loc�� Name: i.�Y 1� �� , � ; � � � � _ = Address 1 City!Zip: � �� L�Y'� � �Y f�t /� ,h.�/� � � / � Name: LY�/ � C-r y�'TGZ-� License#: l�y�l�g� �� p�+�Qf; � Address: ..�`� � 1 C�V /. City: �G�GYScfJ'v' � � /- ' � � State: �� Zip: .�y��4� Phone: �/,s��t�p - ��.la `� � � � ') / / / � � = � �� Contact:L,/l1'r'� �Gl�d ki�� Email: "'i�Uil��f T�/ Q� , 1�z"� � _ � � � .�.��^�� _New �B�placement _Repair _Rebuild _Modify Space _Work in R.O.W. . � '� J�� ` Description of worlc: J Z� ;� RESlDENT1AL � � � � � Water Heater � � � � � ,�Water Softener � � Lawn I�rigation(_RPZ 1 PVB) � ' �� — � � Septic System � Add Plumbing Fi�ctures�Main!_Lower Level) � � � � � _New � Water Turnaround � �� Abandonment � � �.,,� — � RESIDENTIAL FEES: � � $60.00 Water Heater,Water Softener, or Water Heater and Softener(includes State Surcharge) � $60.00 Lawn lrrigation {includes State Surcharge) ` $6Q.00 Add Plumbing Fixtures, Septic Svstem Abandonment,Water Turnaround`(includes State Surcharge) � "Water Turnaround(add$210.QQ if a 5/8"meter is required) ' � $115.Q0 Sep6c SYstem New{includes County fee and State Surcharge) � � TOTAI.FEES� ��. � CALL BEFORE YOU DiG. Call Gopher State One CaA at(651)454�02 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig#o receive locates of underground utilities. www,c�ophers�ateonecall.c�rq I hereby ackrawledge that this information is camplete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with U�e ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; tfiat I understand this is not a permit, but onYy an app{ication for a permit, and work is not to staR writhout a permit;that tfie work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of wrork which requires a review and approval of pians. � � / / ,�� x ��'/.r» :1�''�Y11�C �� x � - - ��0 ,��_..� Applicant's Printed Name Ap � M's Signature �� ' �+�� t�f�+�ti�n� :,��+d�r�� n ` �€T�t �� '�# ; �. ' PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing Permit Number:EA141311 Date Issued:03/06/2017 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 2292 Clark St Lot:10 Block: 5 Addition: River Hills 9th PID:10-64400-05-100 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Replace Description:Water Heater Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Building Code). Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$59.00 0801.4087 Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Paul H Teske 2292 Clark St Eagan MN 55122 (651) 890-7680 Champion Plumbing 3670 Dodd Rd., #100 Eagan MN 55123 (651) 365-1340 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Mechanical Permit Number:EA170105 Date Issued:06/21/2021 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 2292 Clark St Lot:10 Block: 5 Addition: River Hills 9th PID:10-64400-05-100 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Replace Description:Air Conditioner Comments:Questions regarding electrical permit requirements should be directed to State Electrical Inspector, Pete DeGrood at (507) 210-0754. Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State Fee Summary:ME - Permit Fee (Replacements)$59.00 0801.4088 Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Paul H & Mary W Teske 2292 Clark St Saint Paul MN 55122--191 Ray N Welter Heating 4637 Chicago Ave S Minneapolis MN 55407 (612) 825-6867 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature