The URL can be used to link to this page

4612 Galaxie Pt0 0 ? Q? :? -W- ?F(, i 2r-- 6. P ?SIDENTIAL -IAKh 'BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN -e 3830 PILOT KNOB RD - 55122 651-681-4675 New Construction Reciulroments • 3 registered site surveys showing sq, ft. of lot, sq. fl. of house; and all roofed areas (20% maximum lot coverage allowed) 2 copies of plan showing beam & windax sizes; poured found design, etc.) . 3 cop?es of TreeCPreservatlon Plan if lot platted after 7/7193 ?? a o?y l . Rim Joist Detail Oplions selection sheet (bldgs with 3 or less units) 164_1959 DATE ID "H -0 1 JOB SITE C= nLt -1 x . i:. IF MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTY OWN tiff 483 /S S' Remodel/Repair Requirements . 2 copies of plan • 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated addifions 1 sBe suney for exterior additions 8 decks • Indicate "rfhome servedby septlcsystem for addRions > 3 A ? VALUATION P Q-,) NT TYPE OF WORK U FIREPLACE(S) _ 0Z 1_ 2 APPLICANT Pi I c- IL L 4- S C -H PHONE# ADDRESS rl-.iq 6 S to rJ `c, Tf,R/Ly iq 1114 ?liLc4y - ZIP CODE PAGER # CELL PHONE #(0 I-) S`! 8?0 5 b FAX #0! S-? ??l 7 B p? 0 NE1V RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ONLY - FILL OUT COMPLETELY Energy Code Category MINNESOTA RULES 7670 CATEGORY 1 (check one) - Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet Submitted - Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted _ MINNESOTA RULES 7672 1 I-? 3?? ? - New Energy Code Worksheet Submitted 7 I '1 'j .- , Plumbing Contractor: M JA+? P L v M 6? N V Phone #: (osPlumbing System Includes: _ X 3 Mechanical Contractor: To.-JS Mechaiucal System Includes: X X Water Softener Lawn Sprinkler ree: $90.00 Water Heater / No. of R.I. Baths No. of Baths H f,q T) nf?- r(-1 C Phone# Air Conditioning Fee: $70.00 Heat Recovery System Sewer/Water Contractor: 5 o N?t -? o^j i?_ x c r1Vri T I t)? Phone # ? 5 I?`1 Y,,? o y 3 I ?1I " , .-, . . , '-:' ,'1? 11 All above information must be submitted prior to processing of application. ?(?,,,^_? 1?'C I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state th informatiori is correct, cielTo comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eaga Or nan es. ' Signature of Applicant '?? Certificates of Survey Received It> ) Tree Preservation Plan Received 00 Not Required _ . l T-e S l,l Y J 2? Updated 1/01 A H?) v -? - OFFICE USE ONLY . ? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex ? 13 16-plex ? 20 Pool ? 30 Accessory Bldg 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 EM. Alt - Multi 03 07 of _ plex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage O 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 33 Ext. Alt- SF ? 04 02-piex ? 10 08-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 36 Multi ? OS 03-plex ? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage ? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex Plbg_Y or_ N ? 25 Miscellaneous X 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish (Bldg)" ? 43 Reroof ? 46 Windows/Doors ? 34 Replacement "Demolition (Entire Bldg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant Valuation d ?0 yf 000 ? Occupancy MC/ES System Census Code J-0-1- Zoning City Water SAC Units f Stories 2 Booster Pump Nbr. of Units ? Sq. Ft. Z2-Z 2 PRV Nbr. of Bldgs ? Length 6 G ?-G Fire Sprinklered Type of Const v- N Width tf `l , e `t x ? ? ? REQUIRED I?ISPECTIONS ?C Final/C.O. FinaUNo C.O. _ Plumbing _ HVAC _ Other Pool Ftgs Air/Gas Tests _ Final _ Windows new/replacement) Approved By ------------------------------ - Base Fee Building Inspector Surcharge ?}SZ r Plan Review I sY,3 ? x s? 1 Tr ' MC/ES SAC ciry sac t W S l & St ?i??2 o ? G ?- ?Y o 3? er a upp y orage S." 1 -<(y S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant n Nn 2 ` Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit License Search Copies GA 2?? Other ?,{ 7? ? Y' Total 2?3 38/ Footings (new bldg) Footings (deck) Footings (addition) Foundation Drain Tile Roof Y, Ice & Water ? Final Framing Fireplace X, R.I. X, Air Test >( Fin Final _ Siding Stucco Stone Insulation Address I AX 'e- P f' Zip 5512 Lot ! Blk ? Sub eii ff 1vOvWS O-F &L44 K) THESE TI'EMS WERE / WERE NOT COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. Date: & Yes No Inspector. -? Final grade (6" from siding) Permanent steps (garage) Permanent steps (main entry) Permanent driveway Permanent gas Sod/Seeded grass Trail/curb damage Porch Basement finish Deck Please verify with the builder the removal of rodi test caps from the plumbing system and the shut-off of water supply to the outside lawn faucet before freeze potential exists. Contact engineering division at 681-4645 before working in right-of-way or installing underground sprinkler system. ? White - City Copy Yellow - Resident Copy Pink - Contractor Copy //? lI 6A c./? u; ? 'J'?- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT This easement, made this day of 2006, between HAU LE and PHiJONG THI LE, husband and wif ,(hereinafter referred to as "Landowners"), and the City of Eagan, a Minnesota municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "City"). WITNESSETH: That the Landowners, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and convey unto the City, its successors and assigns, a temporary construction easement for site grading purposes over, under, across and through the following described premises, situated within County, Minnesota, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 1, CLIFF WOODS OF EAGAN, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary easement being the West 25.0 feet of the South 50.0 feet of said Lot 1. Together with: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, across and through the West 10.0 feet of the North 80A feet of the South 130.0 feet of said Lot 1. Together with: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under across and through that part of the West 15.0 feet of said Lot 1 lying northerly of the South 130.0 feet thereof. Said temporary easements to expire on December 31, 2007. See also Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. The grant of the foregoing temporary construction easements for site grading purposes include the right of the City, its contractors, agents and servants to enter upon the premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct and inspect site grading and the further right to remove trees, brush, undergrowth and other obstructions. After completion of such construction, maintenance, repair or removal, the City shall restore the premises to the condition in which it was found prior to the commencement of such actions, save only for the necessary removal of trees, brush, undergrowth and other obstructions, subject only to permanent easement alterations. The Landowners, their hens and assigns, do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are the owners of the premises aforesaid and have good right to grant and convey . the easements herein to the City. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Landowners have caused this easement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. Hau Le Phuong Thi L STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c?-)-Q\ day of ?UU`{ , 2006, by Hau Le and Phuong Thi Le, husband and wife. 5,.--- JEANETfE ANN JOHNSON Public `Nomry Pu6?Minnes? ?r ?mm?on ?.?., ai. aoae APPROVED AS TO FORM: v e-, ? City Attorney's Office Dated: ??2 5??010 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ??-?' ? Public Works Department Dated: 7/Z`?/06 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Robert B. Bauer SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. 7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600 Apple Valley MN 55124 Direct Line: (952) 8953-8847 Office Line: (952) 432-3136 (RBB: 206-23977) ? i`Z?__ ---___- CLIFF ROAD LEGEND -- ?---, '? ----- PROPOSED TEMPORARY - i------ --------' -- -- _ _ _ _ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT / i--- ( 2442 SQ. FT.) / f /? -- - 1 ? i N Q CONSTRUCTIO O LIMITS I ? I I ? ; ?O ? I? ? - W ? J I ? ? ? > 1 ? i ? =-_' 10, o so Q I I ? I O saalo? W ? L A i 1 ? M l ? Q J Q I I ? r L ? V I zs? ° ? I ?_- L 1 C, , 2 . ?;4, s I I i ? /I TEMPORARY EASEMENT A j kl n GALAXIE AVENUEfBLACKHAWK ROAD p Consmi.nxcCRae,luc CITY PROJECT NO. 934 5573 CITY OF EAGAN EXHIBIT 9f32006 g ? °n Figure 2 Surveyor's Certificate SURVEY FOR :RICK LESCH DESCRIBED AS : Lot 1, Block 1, CLIFF WOODS OF EAGAN, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota and reserving easements of record. JAN 16 REC°6 h ? ? °a b ? N.'f irr?? ?_?'? 1 a? u? 6:a hl r x x 9bA.1 \\ 1S>- 1 - 9?c5,9 ? ? ?i9 J? i? 9[09. rn 22.00 N 9(n3.5 \\ J p IO Qloo.9 b3.1 2.00 10.00 9?ifl ?o ? orop 3cs, Eo q65. r `9 0 ? I 0 2.00 9b3.1 , ' IO 9e3.5 o 11.50 ? o Proposed m ` xc ly ? _z.oo 2-story a ? 6.0 0 8'pcw 11.50 963A I ? o+ ? 9?1.9 16 06- 9fo2? 2.00 o I / + 1 p? m o0 9b5A o .1C 32.00 J 9b9.2 g? '2 I9b3. o x W a . .. .. . _ - ?_ 15 .00 x a-? N89°` 9.1? _.Y,964,v I ? _j Exist Home ? i TOB = 968.7 ? + / / ? . 'a 4/9(.81 F+,s ) ?e oH°? 96'97 ? ----- &?_ 7"E 230.11 LOT SQ. FOOTAGE = 19,801 HSE. SQ. F00 TA GE = 2,239 LOT COVERAGE 11% PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Top of Foundation = qL,5,7 Garage Floor Drpp3qc 11(.3-2 Basement Floor =q57.7 Aprox. Sewer Service =q55.3! Proposed Elev. _ C=D Existing Elev. Drainage Directions = - Denotes Offset Stake = . HEDLUND PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING 2005 Pin Oak Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: (651) 405-6600 Fox : (651) 405-6606 ? ? \ ? \ \ \ Z \ ??y O 968. C1? JAz w m W BENCHMARK, C, P. 6ca1 qx i e Ei?? = q59.56 SCALE: 1 inch - 30 feet MIN. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Front - House Side - Rear - Garage Side - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS SURVEYED BY ME DR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. DATE JZ /LTr_/1GL D • F Y D. LINDGREN, LA SURVEYOR N TA LICENSE NU ER 14376 N0: 01 R- 580 FILE: Cliff Woods r ,z ,LA' ,r u 3144 HENNEPIN January 22, 2002 w3'ti83 Lesch, Inc. 14009 Flagstone Trail Apple Valley, MN 55124 "-EAGAN REVJEWED SY DATE -- EL1L0ING 1PI5!'ECTl94'l? Re: Lesch Model Home AVENUE SOUTH 4612 Galaxie Point = Foundation Investigation, Eagan, MN Project #02209 MINNEAPOLIS Dear Mr. Lesch: M[ N N E 5 O T A 5 5 4 O 8- 2 6 1 9 At your request, we performed a structural analysis of the existing foundations under the new loading conditions for Girder Truss "S" (refer to truss description and layout plan prepared by Automated Building Components dated 1/10/02) of the referenced residence. We understand that the truss condition changed from the original design (girder truss will now span between the two exterior walls of the garage) and that the local Building Official wanted a structural engineer to review the foundations at the bearing locations. Information regarding the framing of the house was taken from Sheets 1-6 prepared by Meyer Design Service and was received on 1/17/02. The following are the results of our analysis: Girder Truss "S" bearing down the page between the garage doors 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing: Fill 6" CMU top course and 12" CMU foundation wall below with grout over 16" length of the wall to the top of the 20" wide x 8" thick ? concrete footing below: Minimum compressive strength of grout at 28 days (fc) to be 4000 psi. Center corefill on column. ' Minimum column size required at girder truss bearing:'S_- 2x4.'> Spruce-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. Existing 20" wide x 8" thick concrete wall footing: Existing strip footing is: acceptable for support of truss-column. Girder Truss "S" bearing up the page at the rear of the garage 612.822.6950 FAX: 612.822.8385 EMAIL: mjseng@ qwest.net Minimum column size required at girder tiuss bearing: 3- 2x4. Spntice-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. :?, ' 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing: Fill 6" ' CMU top course and top course of 12" and foundation wall below " with grout over 16" length of the wall. See Item 2 above for grout strength and location of corefill. Existing 3'-0" x 3-0" x 8" thick concrete footing below: Existing footing is acceptable for truss support. Please call with any questions. Respectfully Submitted, icnard `JJ. Johnson, P.E. Minnesota Registration #23406 ? A RECEIVED i-o9-oz City of Eagan Engumcering Depk 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 Att: John Gwder Asst. City Engineer Joel Rausch, Engineer Technician Re: Lot I Blk l, Cliff Woods of Fagan & Lot 1, Blk 1, Galaxie Hill Oaks JAN 14 2002 EAGAN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I'm sending you a copy of a letter W put in the file for Lot 1 Blk 1 Cliff Woods of Eagan. Joel Rausch was present on 12-12-01 along with Greg Hove (city fores[er) when at the above lots decisions and agreements were made to resolve the issues rWd'mg the placement of the proposed house an I# 1 Blk 1 Cliff Woods of Eagan, and thaz the builder/owner of this lot (Rick Ixsch) would grant us a 2/1/2 & x 150 & easement In exchange for us paying for and removing a large white oak on his property (which we did). After the tree was removed and the city approved his house plans he has since changed his mind regmxling the easement. However , on 12-12-01 while Greg Hove and Jcet Rausch were thae and we were discussing specifics about the removal of the tree, I asked the builder /owner Rick Lesch, to sign a letter stating what we agreed upon with the easement in exchange for the removal of the tree and he did 'Ihouglt it may not be a recordable document it is enforcable I do want to make stwe that the city is aware of this and the problems we are currently having. With this Letter agreement for the easement not being of record it is certainly going to be problems for the fitwe home owners and for us. We have put a lot of good faith, time, money and effort into working with the development in our back yard We have continually received the short aid of the deal by bWh the first owner and now the second owner. I don't know what we could have done diffeently. But, as homeowners & citizens of Eagm and not to mention my husband provides the city with his services as a firefighter, we give a lot back to the city. And we waut to make siue dhat conce[ns and rights as existmg homeowners are taken mto considerazion during developments such as this This has been a long and painful experience for us and it is not over. We are going to work on getting this builder to live up to his written agreement and give us a recorduA easement document (2!12 ft x 150 ft) which we have already compensated him for. Please be aware that his cement contractors have damaged the South corner of of grass and sprinkler s em. This being the smne area the last builder damaged. Please let me know the correct puxdm to have ' fixed so we may be reimbiused this time. Pam' km Rick McLay 11-47 Galaxie Ct Eagan, MN 55122 enclosure 1-7-02 To: Rick L,eschlLesch Inc. 14800 Gala:de Ave Apple Valley, MN 55124 1041;X6 04P le From: Pam Larkin & Rick McLay 1749 Gataxie Ct Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lot 1, Blk 1, Cliff Woods of Eagan & Lot 1, Blk 1, Galaxie Hill Oaks, (additional easement) Based on your binding agreement to grant us an easarieat of 2%s ft x 150 ft for our existing trees, as evidenced by the original letter agreement (the "Agreement") discussed and signed by you on 12112101, we had an Easement Agremart prepared by ow aUomey for your review. In consideration for the Agreement, we removed the large white oak an your property at a cost of S400, thus making the AgreEmait legally binding. Both Greg Hove and Jcet Rausch from the City of Eagan were present at the time this easement was being discussed and the letter Agreemem signed. While the Easement Agreement that was prepared was consistent with the existing easement of record, you indicated t6at the new easement agreement be fa the additional only and have limited provisims. To address your concerns, on Friday, 12/21/01, we faxed to your office a revised and greatly simplified Easement Agreement. It has been over two weeks and we have not heard anything from you. One way or another you are obliged to provide us with specific comments regarding this so we may address them and then arrive at a recordable document. We would appreciate receiving the comments in the next week at the latest. As it stands now the letter Agreement you signed gives us a 2.5 Foot by 150 foot easement that runs with our existing easement. This is also evidenced by the Surveyor's Certificate of record at the city dated 12/1210 l. The Wstrnce of this easement, without specific provisions governing, will need to be disclosed to any potential new home owners. However, until a well drafted easement with specific terms and provisions is put of record, The Agreement will likely cause troubles for any potential new home owners. As a professional Realtor/Builder we believe you have a duty to clearly disclose this easement to any parential buyers (think of the trouble you were caused when you didn't know of the content of the existing easement --the only reason it didn't become an even bigger issue was probably due to the fact that there was a specific document of record which you had the ability-and the responsibility to discover); however, in any event, we will be taking the propu steps to make sure our interests are protected. We truly believe it will be better for everyone concerned to get the Eauanent Agreement of record. We are sorry that this is how things are aiding up, but with no furtha cammumicatiaa from you, we are left with no options. Please communicate with all your sub-contractors that they do need to be careful around these trees. The excavator has already knocked down a portion of the safety fence we had put up, and it does need to be restored back to its position. Also, the cement contractors (All in One) have twice nm their hvcks over the front comer of our yard and have made deep nrts by our sprinkler heads (114 and 1/7). We have resodded this area and ran new sprinkla lines two times since August 2001, due to damage done from contractors waking for Mendota Homes. We will le[ you know what the approximate costs of repairs will be and expect that you will be taking care of this. Cc: Paul Rachie, Leonard, Street and Deinerd, P,A. City of Eagan, Forestry Dept., Engineering Dept & Building Inspection Dept. "' • RECEIVED 1-saoa Rick Lesch/Lesch, IncJRHS Realty 14800 Galaxie Ave. Apple Valley, MN 55124 Rick: FEB o 4 2002 EAGAfu ENGINEERIINK Enclosed are copies of the last letter we sent to you and a copy of the letter agreement you signed granting us an easernent Basically we are asking for an explanation as to why you have failed to respond to our letters and what your intentions are at this point Your reluctance to address this situation is aeatin8 more of a problem not to mention hard feelings. We feel this still could be resolved rather simply, however, if you don't respond to this letter we will be taking action to involve RHS Realty, file a complaint with the Board of Realtors Ethics Committee, along with commencing legal action for non performance.. If we are forced to go in that direction we will be asking for all legal oosts to be paid by you plus any other damages. We would also past signs throughout our backyard and on our top deck notifying any new owner of this easement problem and any pending litigation. It is clear that an easement has already been granted by the agreement signed on 12112/0 1, though it is not clear what is governed in this easement As a Realtor you and RHS Realty may have an ethics violation if this is not handled propaly. All we want is to be able to record the easement you have already granted us. We would like to have a response no later than Feb. 5d', 2002. This is to also put you on notice that no damage should come co the trees on these easements. Pam Larkin 8c Rick McLay Cc: Paul Rachie, Leonard , Street and Deinard, P.A. City of Eagan Enclosures ?') I Zw, '4b 4, 1-7-02 To: Rick Lesch/Lesch Inc. 14800 Gelaxie Ave Apple Valley, MN 55124 From: Pam Larkin & Rick McLay 1747 Galaxie Ct Eagan, MN SS l22 Re: Lot 1, Blk 1, Cliff Woods of Eagan & Lot 1, Blk I, Galaxie Hill Oaks, (additional easement) Based on yow binding agreement to grant us an easanent of 2%: ft x 150 ft for our existing trees, as evidenced by the original letter agreetnent (the "AgreemenY') discussed and signed by you on 1211210 1, we had an Easement Agreement prepared by our attomey for your review. In consideration for the Agreement, we removed the large white oak on your property at a cost of S400, thus making the Ageemau legally binding. Both Greg Hove and Joel Rausch from the City of Eagan were present at the time this easement was being discussed and the letter Agreement signed. While the Easement Agreement that was prepared was consistent with the existing easement of record, you indicated that the new easement agreement be for the additional only and have limited provisions. To address your concems, on Friday, 1212 1/01, we faxed to your office a revised and greatly simplified Easement Agreement. It has been over two weeks and we have not heard anything from you. One way or another you are obliged to provide us with specific comments regarding this so we may address them and then arrive at a recordable document We would appreciate receiving the commrnts in the next week at the latest. As it stands now the letter Agreement you signed gives us a 2.5 foot by 150 foot easement thet runs with our existing easement. This is also evidenced by the Surveyor's Certificate of record at the city dated 12/12/01. The existence of this easement, without specific provisions goveming, wip need to be disclosed to any potential new home owners. However, until a well drafted easement with specific terms and provisions is put of record, The Agreement will likely cause troubles for any potential new home owners. As a professional Realtor/Builder we believe you have a duty to clearly disclose this easement to any potential buyers (Wink of the trouble you were caused when you didn't know of the content of the existing easement -the only reason it didn't become an even bigger issue was probably due to the fad that there was a specific document of record which you had the ability-and the responsibility to discover); however, in any event, we will be taking the proper steps to make sure our interests are protected. We ituly believe it will be belter for everyone ooncemed to get the Easemeut Agreement of record . We are sorry that this is how things are aiding up, but with no further communication from you, we are left with no options. Please communicate with all your sub-contractors that they do need to be careful around these trees. The excavator has already knocked down a Pa'Non of the safety fence we had put up, and it does need to be restored back to its position. Also . the cement contractors (All in One) have twice nm their trucks over the front comer of our yard and have made deep ruts by our sprinkler heads (1/4 and 1/7). We have resodded this area and ran new sprinkler lines two times since August 2001, due to damage done from contractors working for Mendota Homes. We will let you know what the approximate costs of repairs will be and expect that you will be taking care of this. Cc: Paul Rachie, Leonard, Stred and Deinard, P.A. City of Eagan , Forestry Dept., Engineaing Dept & Building Inspection Dept. ? • ??? 1 .. --- \ ^ i; I OaJ? ? Lv4- I -M.C I ? ? p.L,z„'/r ,r! tiSk &3 .January, 22; 2002 Lesch, Inc. 14009 Flagstone Trail Apple Valley, MN 55124 3144 HENNEPIN Re: Lesch Model Home AVENUE SOUTH 4612 Galaxie Point - Foundation Investigation, Eagan, MN Project #02209 - MINNEAPOLIS Dear Mr. Lesch: M 1 N N E 5 O T A At your request, we performed a structural analysis of the existing 5 5 4 0 8- 2 6 i 9 foundations under the new loading conditions for Girder Truss "S" (refer to truss description and layout plan prepared by Automated Building Components dated 1/10/02) of the referenced residence. We understand that the truss condition changed from the original design (girder truss will now span between the two exterior walls of the garage) and that the local Building Official wanted a structural engineer to review the foundations at the bearing locations. Information regarding the framing of the house was taken from Sheets 1-6 prepared by Meyer Design Service and was received on 1/17/02. The following are the results of our analysis: Girder Truss "S" bearing down the page between the garage doors Minimum column size required at girder muss bearing: 5= 2x4 : Spruce-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing: Fill 6" CMU top course and 12" CMU foundation wall below with grout over 16" length of the wall; to the-,top of the 20" wide x 8" thick conqrete foo?`ng ti"To`w.?? Mini'mcorripressive strength of grout at 28 days (fc) to be 4000 psi.'.- Center corefill on column. 3. Existing 20" wide x S" thick concrete wall footing: Existing strip footing is acceptable for support of truss column. x .% Girder Truss "S" bearing up the page at the rear of ttie garage 612.822.6950 F A X: 61 2. 8 2 2. 8 3 8 5 I• Minimum column size'reqirired at girder truss bearing: 3,=2z4 ; EMAIL: Spruce-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. miseng@ qwcst.aet 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing: ?,Fi116" CMU top course and top course of 12" andfoi»idatio? wall.Uelow? ?)gitt grout"a'ver i6" Ieng?of ttie wall: See Item 2 above for grout strength and location of corefill. 3. Existing 3'-0" x 3-0" x 8" thick concrete footing below: Existing footing is acceptable for truss support. Please call with any questions. Respectfully Submitted, VZd'Jv. Johnson, P.E. Minnesota Registration #23406 r/%/6is'r i r TS H?- `f Y- 3 January 22, 2002 Lesch,Inc. 14009 Flagstone Trail Apple Valley, MN 55124 r EAGAN R?v EWED BY " ----- DATE s- ----- -- -- BUILDING lNSPFCTIOM::? P 3144 HENNEPIN Re: Lesch Model Home AVENUE SOUTH [4612_Galaxie Point - Foundation Investigation, Eagan, MN Project #02209 M I N N E A P O L I S . Dear Mr. Lesch: M I N N E S O T A 5 5 4 0 8- 2 6 1 9 At your request, we performed a structural analysis of the existing foundations under the new loading conditions for Girder Truss "S" (refer to truss description and layout plan prepared by Automated Building Components dated 1/10/02) of the referenced residence. We understand that the truss condition changed from the original design (girder truss will now span between the two exterior walls of the garage) and that the local Building Official wanted a structural engineer to review the foundations at the bearing locations. Information regarding the framing of the house was taken from Sheets 1-6 prepared by Meyer Design Service and was received on 1/17/02. The following are the results of our analysis: Girder Truss "S" bearing down the page between the garage doors Minimum column size required at girder truss bearing: 5- 2x4 Spruce-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. 612.822.6950 FAX:612.822.8385 EMAI L: mjseng6qwest.net 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing: Fill 6" CMU top course and 12" CMU foundation wall below with grout over 16" length of the wall to the top of the 20" wide x 8" thick concrete footing" below: Minimuhi compressive strength of grout at 28 days (f c) to be 4000 psi. Center corefill on column. 3. Existing 20" wide x 8" thick concrete wall footing: Existing strip footing is acceptable for support of truss column. Girder Truss "S" bearing up the page at the rear of the garage Minimum column size required at girder hvss bearing: 3- 2x4' Spruce-Pine-Fir, stud grade or equal. 2. CMU foundation wall condition below column bearing:- Fill b" CMU top course and top course of 12" and foundatiori"wall below with grout over 16" length of the wall. See Item 2 above for grout strength and location of corefill. 3. Existing 3'-0" x 3-0" x 8" thick concrete footing below: Existing footing is acceptable for truss support. Please call with any questions. Respectfully Submitted, V:ichardlVi. Johnson, P.E. Minnesota Registration #23406 4-18-02 City of Eagan Engineering Dept. 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 To: John Gorder, Asst. City Engineer Joel Rausch, Engineer Technician RECEIVED APR 19 2002 EAGAN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT From: Richard McLay & Pamela Larkin 1747 Galaxie Ct Eagan, MN 55122 Re: New Recorded Easement Contract, between, Lot 1, Blk 1, Cliff Woods of Eagan And Lot 1 Blk ] Galaxie Hill Oaks. Enclosed you will find a copy of our newly recorded (and much anticipated) Easement Contract for The full 12'/z ft x 150 ft. This easement gives us very specific rights and control over the plantings, and trees in this area to ad as a buffer and minimize the impact this new development has made on our home. We have worked very hard to get this finalized over the last two years, to make things even more difficult, we have had to work out deals and pay two different builders, and neither one ended up being fair or honest with us. This has been a long and emotional process and we have now paid a total of $15,000 for the control over this easement (with the last $2,000 being handed over to Rick Lesch on Feb. 22, 2002 just to get this issue resolved). Everyone has a right to build and develop their property and we never had a problem with that, all we wanted was to be able to provide ourselves with a nice buffer for privacy and keep or restore as much natural landscaping as possible and to protect the value of our home. We are amazed that even with all our involvement and willingness to work with the development, that it tumed to be such a mess and now it sticks out like a sore thumb. Our view from our home is destroyed forever, the city initially approved a narrow rambler and the second developer crammed a huge 2 story home there instead. So the importance and safety of the 7( seven ) 15' to 20' utes that we planted is everything to us, it makes living with this somewhat bearable. We know there is nothing now that can be done about what has happened , so our focus now is to prevent any fia[her threat to the value of our home by this development and make the best out of this situation. The builder,(Rick I.esch) still has to drain the south side of the house, and with his unannounced egress windows on the south side he is going to have to use extreme care to do so and it might take a little extra time to do this. We are asking the City's assistance in making sure he does so responsibly and without threatening our large trees ability to grow and flourish. Trees of this size can never be replaced in this narrow area, and they are the only thing that is making that new house bearable to have in our back yard and to view daily from our kitchen and family room. It does appear they will be grading soon and we aren't sure what he is going to need to do with the grading issue. If you could keep us informed on what they are going to be required to do for draining we would appreciate it We still have a lot of re- landscaping to do to clean up the backyard which has been a mess now for over two years and knowing how the drainage is going to go would be a big help. Thank you for all help and support throughout this time, we understand some things are out of your control, And your position is not always an easy one. Sincerely, Richard McLay and Pam Larkin ?. ' W ?< ? ?o z HF ? < lid ?_ = W CO ¢Z c i F1 SLL F. O ? N W?W= a Z H ?= f 2 xa ac N r Q a¢ LLJ I W Q W 1l. O ? UO ?¢ 02 . LL IuQ 0 PO'+U O 3) q -d4 - /a311 170 a-LI 5-ayf - / 0 3 E15R W ! '? 3 l ? o If cc a tW7 ? LL W w j 0 N 2 y Q W W (n U ? I U Y ? u Z W co " m U z n Q w p O ? x a N I ? W Q Z U x ? 1 L U AN NDED AND RESTATED EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Amended and Restated Easement Agreement (this "Agreement') is made this day of February, 2002 by and between Lesch, Inc., a Minnesota cozparation, hereinaRer referred to as "Grantor" and Pamela E. Larkin and Richard D. McLay, hereinafter referred to as "Crantees". The Grantor and Grantees are sometimes referred to herein as collectively as the "Parties". WHEREAS, Grantor is the fee owner of real property situated in the County ofDakote, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Cliff Woods of Eagan refeired co herein as "Parcel X% WHEREAS, Grantees are the fee owners of the following described real property situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: I-< Lot 1, Block 1, Galaxie Hill Oaks referred to herein as "Parcel B"; WHEREAS, Parcel A and Parcel S are adjacent and contiguous parcels; WHEREAS, the previous owner of Parcel A granted Grantees an Easement recorded May 7, 2001 as document no. 438988 in the real property records of Dakota County (the "Original Easement Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Origiual Easement Agreement provided for the ability of Grantees to plant and maintain trees and other foliage (the "Plantings'? between the two parcels to act as a buffer providing privacy and other advantages (including aesthetic improvements) to both of the parcels; 2160358v9 day D? T qtxinor, ? L? Surveyor's Certificate SURVEY FOR :RICK LESCH DESCRIBED AS : Lot 1, Block 1, CLIFF WOODS Of EAGAN, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota and reserving easements of record. D FT 13 RK"101 ? .t U !? .?.....?.- 7/ -- A ENG ilE, I ? J Exist Home I i T08 _ 968.7 i f Z O O ? 969. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 3: /l o/ /'6f4r.+lrii wa`/ /G4 v/??C W ?. 66 4?,` roe9f y?, 9697 LOT SQ. FOO TA GE _ HSE. SQ. F00 TA GE _ LOT COVERAGE _ BENCHMARK, C.P. ??qx1e Eica = 959.5s Top of Foundation = qc,s,7 Garage Floor Drop 9(D3.2 Basement Floor =9s-7.7 Aprox. Sewer Service =955.3! Proposed Elev. Existing Elev. _ Drainage Directions = Denotes Offset Stake = . HEDLUND PLANNING ENGLNER.R.ING SURVEYING 2005 Pin Oak Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: (651) 405-6600 Fax : (651) 405-6606 MIN. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SCALE: 1 ineh - 30 feet 19,809 2,2J9 11% Front - House Side - Rear - Garage Side - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS SURVEYED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. DATE 1Z ILZ-?IQL La'b • F Y D. LINDGREN, LA09 SURVEYOR N TA LICENSE NU ER 14376 N0: 01R-580 FILE: Cliff Woods and WI-IFREAS, tIio Paities feel the Plantings are beneficial to both Parcel A fuid Parcel D; i wk1Ei{EAS, the Parties agree that the appropriate location of the Eascment Area of Parcel A(as defined below) necds to be adjusted as more fully set forth below. NOW, Tfi}'-RE.FOIiE?, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt arid sufficioncy of which is hereby acknowledged by both Patties, the Parties hcrcby agree as faliows: 1• T1le Original Easernent Agreement is hereby superceded in its entirely by this amended and restated Agreemynit. 2- Grantor hereby grants to the Grantecs, thezr Iieirs, successors aud assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusiyc easmiient over aiid across [lie South twelve and one-Iialf fect (12.5') feet of the Wcst otte hundred and fifty feet (I50') of Parcel A described above (the "Easement Area") for the benefit of Parcel $, for the purpose ufpianting and ntauitaining h•ccs and sluttUs and other Plantings, 3• Grantees shall have ttte sole decision makizig rigtits and responsibilities for all aspects of the Plantings to be made and maintained iu the r,ascment Area, both initially and in thc ii.rture, including the right to choose the types, style an.d density of Plantings, [he right to plant either mahire trees or plants or to plant seedlings, bulbs or any otlier type of Pltuitings; provided, Grantees shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the impact tlio activity associated with the installation and niaintenance of the Plantings has on the owner of Parcel A, in paiiicular, the eventual residential owner of Parcel A, e.g., not using lotic[i machinery for plantiug or maintcxiance late at night. a• Grazitees shall make no mataiial chucigcjs to the grading of ihc Easement Arca or any other material changes to the surFaco of the Easement Area wluch matciially interferes with the drainage plaii for Parcel A. If Grantee disturbs the surface of Parcel A fn breach of the foregoing, the owners of Parcel S shall reasonably restore the surface of Pazcel A to substantially the samo condition as existed prior to the disturbance. 5. If any of the Plantings planted by the awncrs of Parcel B dies or, in the opinion of a registered horticulturalist, sbould be removed due to disease or damage, then the owners of Parcel B shall be responsible for removing said tree or p1an4. trees and The rights granted hereunder shall be limited to the planting and maintenance of other foliage, In no event shall any permanent physical structure be constructed in the P-asoment Area by either Perty, 7. The owners ofparce] B shall indemnify tlio owners of Parcel A against any claim for personal injury or dumage to properry Wluch occurs within the Easement Area as a direct result of its use by the otivners of Parcel B. Tt?is indemnity shall include reasonabla attorneys 2760358v9 .w...?.?.?..._.?._w.e..._?.._ . ? ? fees incurred by the ownus of Parcel A in defending thezuselvcs in tuiy action brought. The owners of Parcel t3 shall furtbpr iudomnify the owners of Parcel A against any mechanic's lien claim resulting from labor or material provided to the owners of Parcel B for ttie planting or znaintenance of tho Easemant Area. 8• Tha tenns azid conditions of this Agzeement shall coxLStitute covenants and servitudCS running wit1i the land, burdening and bcnefiting, as uppurtenazioas, Parcels A and B as specifically stated herein, and shall Ua binding upon and for the benefit of the Parties mid their respective hcirs, personal representatives, devisees, administrators, tetianis, successors and assigns, and any other persons who hereafter acquire an interest in Parcel A or Parcel B by operation of law or other legal means. Whenever a transfcr of ownership of ally of the parcels ocrurs, liability of the tratisferor for broacli of any covcttants occuning thereafter shall . automatically tcnriinate, provided, however, such trEUisferor shall remain liable for any obligations incurred prior to sucli lzaza8fer. 9. L,ach of tlie Partics represents Ulid warrants that it has the full capacity, right, power and authority to execute, deliver aud perform this Agtcemanl, and all required actions, consents and approvals therefor have been duly taken and obtained. I'urthermore, each of the Parties represeuts and warrants that upon tLtll execution of tlus Agreement, tUc real property provisions of this Agreement shall be binding on all purtics with any interest in their respective Parcels. 10. The provisions of this Agreemflctt are for tlic excluaivc benefit of the Parties hereto and thcir successors and assigns and not for the benefit of any third person; and this .4gcetniaent confers no rights, express or implied, upon any such third person; nnd there are no "third party benvficiarias" to tlus Agrcement. 11. Tlus Agrecment may be signed in countorparts, each of which shall be deemed an origuiai and all of which, taken together, shall constihite ona instrumvnl. 12. 'I1iis Agreeinent rcpresents the entire understanding betwecn the Patties and all prior written or oral agreements are hereby declared null and void. Any written amendment to this Agreement shall only be effective when rcduced to writing and said writing is signed by the oNvncrs of both Parcel A and Parcel B. [Signature page follows.] xieo3ss.v IN WITNESS WIIEItCOF , the Parties have caused this dvcumcnt to be executed on the day and year first Nvritten above. cREuvxoR: LESC$1NC., a Minnesota carporativn BY: zts: STATE OF MINIVESOTA ) COUNTX OF Z% s?)ss. GRAN7'I;ri g: a.zuniIi Ou this ZK?"day of February, 2002, t?efare me appeared ;, , the r si a.„ -F? 4gY,?ch, .Inc., a corporation organized ?uld existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, who executed this document on behalf of the corporation. `m . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF On thisv/day of February, 2002, before me Larkin, who executed this dooumont. THIS INCTRIIArtqNT WAS PRA]?BD By., Lcuaard, Street and De(nard (pC]k) 150 South Fifth Stree; Suite 2300 MilumP01111, MN 55402 21G03J$N) JUDY M. dENKINS NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA - MY Commissiart ExP7resJan. 31, 2005 D. McLaY and Pamela E, SUSAN E. LACY NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA MyCommieebn ExpieeJan. 31.2006 MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Minnesota Enerav Code VlNchec';( Software Versicr, 3. -u i 1 ? °nrtnit # i i i _,.?ci;?d '_•iiC'2is COUNTY: Washington - STATE: Minnesota ZONE: 2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family DATE: 12-12-2001 DATE OF PLANS: 12/12/01 TITLE: LESCH MODEL HOME PROJECT INFORMATION: 2 STORY WALKOUT COMPLIANCE: PASSES Reauired UA = 778 Your Home = 547 29.7% Better Than Code Area or Cavitv Cont. Glazina/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA CEILINGS: Raised Truss 1753 38.0 2.0 WALLS: Wood Frame. 16" O.C. 4388 19.0 2.0 BSMT: Conc. 9.6' ht/9.0- ba/9.0' insul 900 10.0 0.0 BSMT: Conc. 3.0' hU3.0' ba/3.0' insui 48 10.0 0.4 or Doors. Above Grade 481 72 50 inditioned Snace 360 0 30.0 Ide Air 28 30.0 2.0 Fumace. 90.0 AFUE Air Conditioner. 12.0 SEER COMPLIANCE S' consistent with th submitted with IN designed to meet The orooosed bui is. soecifications. ration. The Drooc ents of the N{inne: 450246 4 0.350 168 25 2.0 11 3 desian described here is other calculations buildina has been Energy Code. Date ).2-/ 3- o i Minrresota Enerav Code MNcheck Software Version 3.0 LESCH MODEL HOME DATE: 12-12-2001 ,°jAN REVIEW AND lNSPaGTiON ISSUES This list of items mav be helefui for Plan Revievuers .r,c -=uiidina lns;;ecicrs ?c Jse as a auide ;or --nicrcino ihe ;Ulinnescta cnerev vOC2. The ILElTiS cGCIV iC Grouo R. Division 3 Occupancies. one- and two-familv residential dwellings. The items marked with " apply only to detached one- and two-family residential dwellings. PLAN REVIEW ISSUES FOUNDATION INSULATION - foundation wall insulation R-5 minimum - foundation insulation extends from too of wall down to ton of the footing - exterior foundation insulation is covered by a protective coating finish CONCRETE SLAB OR UNDER-SLAB INSULATION - slab on arade oerimeter insulation R-5 minimum - slab insulation extends from top of slab to design frost line or top of footina - floors over unheated space R-30 minimum WINDOWS / DOORS / SKYLIGHTS - averaae U-value is 0.37 maximum for windows and glass doors (excludes foundation windows) - window U-value consistent wrifh buildinp olan and MNcheck Reoort - window and door area consistent with building plan and MNcheck Report MECHANICAL VENTILATION ISSUES - residential mechanical ventilation system provides adequate ventilation oer code reauirements' - fumace efficiencv is consistent with MNcheck or buildina desian olan - orotecton aaainst excessive depressurization is installed per code requirements" ENVELOPE INSULATION FOR PLAN REVIEW - interior basement insulation R-5 minimum (if no exterior insulation) - ceilinas with attics R-38 or consistent with building plan and MNcheck Reoort - wall framina and insulation level is consistent with building design and MNcheck Report INSPECTION ISSUES -wind wash barrier installed at attic edae - exterior wall comers framed so that insulation can be installed after - intersections of interior oafition walls and exterior walls are framed so that insulation can be installed between the nahition and exterior sheathina after exterior sheathina is installed - aaos between framina less than one-half inch are eliminated by securing framina toaether or are insulated at the time of assemblv - all cenetrations between conditioned and unconditioned spaces made prior to framing inspection are sealed INTERIOR AIR BARRIER - all fire stoos are air sealed - oines. ducts. wires. equipment and flues and chimneys through the interior air barrier are sealed - a sealed continuous interior air barrier is installed on the warm side of the buildina envelooe at ceilinas. waAs. and floor rim ioist areas" - air barrier behind tub and shower is sealed and protected - recessed liqht fixtures are sealed ENVELOPE INSULATION - basement insulation R-5 minimum - wind wash barrier on wall seoaratina house and aaraae is sealed - loose fill insulation is oreventerl from entersna the =2ves - insulation on skviiaht shafts and wails exposed in attics is s;:epor:zc on the unconditioned side AT 7C INSULATION - attic access panel insulated to R-38 For -ailing panel and R-19 :or wall oanel - attic card attached to framina near access ooenina - notification of attic R-value and date of installation posted near building permit inspection card This is a summarv onlv. Other reauirements mav aontv. See the Minnesota Enerav Code. Questions? Call the Deoartment of Pubiic Service Information Center at 651-296-5175 or 1-800-657-3710. ? (SEE ATTACHMENTS) Development _cLV'c wZ.`0175 ?? C&rlfv Lot Number 1 Block Number ' Address 461Z ?ftu3y-(c-, Builder Rlf-?, i_f?5(' ?-- GI?_._ Sq Tree Protection Requirements: Tree Fencing Oak Tree Pruning (immediately seal wounds during April I to July 31) Therapeutic Pruning Retaining Wall Other: Replacement Trees: Not Required +?KtN ?as??.?,v 7 as Follows: zNs[r?i.i.iD eN L Attachments: Yes No Nr-ORF-8T"" DIYISION Additional Not es: H:\ghove\20001i1e\VeepreslTree Preservation Plan Summary-2000 LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROPERTYLEGAI: ( C?T / ?Vor4? I ??k 'Ft DATE OF SURVEY: d LATEST REVISION: ? c W L c? DOCUMENT STANDARDS Y ¢ O Z v Q 67'/ LI ? • Registered Land Sunreyorsignature and company ? ? ? ? • Building PerrnR Applicant G? • Legal description ? ? • Address ? ? • North arrow and scale yy ? ? • House type (rambler, walkouf, spNt wJO, split entry, lookout, etc.) ?? ? ? • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient % ? C ? • Proposedlexisting sewer and water services & invert elevation Il// ? ? • Street name GY ? r? 0 ? 0 • Driveway S • Lot quare Footage ?/? ? • Lot Coverage L? ? ? • Benchmark 9K ELEVATIONS Existina C4? ? ? • Sewer service (or Proposed) ? ? . Property comers ?? . Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions ?? • Elevations of any exis6ng adjacent homes ??/ ? • Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches ? f?' ? • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.) Proposed [1/ ? ? • Garage Floor C? ? ? . First floor ? ? ? • Lowest exposed elevation (walkouVwindow) M/? 11 • Property comers Ca/o ? . Front and rear of home at the foundation PONDING AREA (if applicable) ? 0/? • Easement line ? d ? . NWL ? R( ? • HWL ? ?? /? • Pond # designation ? LY ? • Emergency Overflow Elevation / DIMENSIONS E3" 0 ? • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions ? ? . Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb) [a' ?? • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc. ? (i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings) p? • Show all easements of record and any City utNkies within those easements ? • Setbacks of proposed structure and sideyard setback of adjacent existing structures [5' ? 0 • Retaining wall requirements, if any . Reviewed: Name September 19, 2005 To: Gregg Hove From: Dave Westermayer Re: 4612 Galasie Point tree planting I contacted Mr. Le this morning and explained that we require a minimum of 7 ft. of horizontal clearance on each side of a water main so he would not be able to plant any trees in that location. He is now proposing to install a fence. I explained to him that this could be an option, however, he must realize that if we need to remove his fence for water main maintenance any damage to the fence and replacement of the fence will be his responsibility. I also told him to put it on the Galaxie Pt. side as opposed to the trail side since Galaxie Pt is a private street and we have no jurisdiction over it. Any further questions please let me know. LEurvnxU Srxr;Ei AND DEINARD VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Hau V. & Phoung T. Le 4612 Galaxie Pt Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Legal Consequences of Damage to Easement Area Dear Mr. and Mrs. Le, ISO SOUTH FIFTH STREET SV[TE 2300 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5$¢02 612-33S-I500 MAIN 612-335-i657 enx PAUL C. RACHIE 612-335-1662 nixecT PAUL. RACH1E@LFANARD.COM As you know, your neighbors, Rick McLay and Pam Larkin, have a legal "Easement" for the benefit of their property over a portion of your property. The Easement is over and across the South twelve and one-half feet (12.5') feet of the West one hundred and fifty feet (150') of your property (the "Easement Area"). The Easement is for the purpose of planting and maintaining trees and shrubs and other foliage (the "Plantings") between the two yards to act as a buffer providing privacy and other aesthetic advantages. I am an attorney for Rick and Pam and am writing on their behalf in an effort to avoid having to bring a court action against you to: (i) enforce their rights, (ii) have a judge determine the amount of any monetary damages you may owe my clients because of your actions, and (iii) seek reimbursement for all legal fees and costs incurred by my clients in enforcing the legally binding agreement which governs who is and who is not allowed to make any changes to the Easement Area. The terms of the Easement Agreement are clear, legally enforceable and a matter of public record with the County Recorder's office. Among other things, the Easement Agreement gives Rick and Pam "the sole decision makinp Easement Area both initially and in the future, including the right to choose the types, style and density of Plantings, the right to plant either mature trees or plants or to plant seedlings, bulbs or any other type of Plantings." It has come to their attention that you have apparently taken it upon yourselves to make alterations to a 22 foot tree in the Easement Area that were so extreme, that it may have caused irreparable damage to the tree and it is unknown at this time whether the tree will survive. While if is not clear whether such damage was done intentionally to destroy the tree or whether it was done without care or consideration of the grave consequences, in either case your actions are very troubling and completely unacceptable; more importantly, from a legal perspective such actions are in clear contravention of my clients' rights under the Easement Agreement to have sole decision making rights and responsibility for all trees, shrubs and other foliage in the Easement Area. You are to have NO contact with any of the trees, shrubs or plantings in the Easement Area. LAW OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS • MANRATO • Si. CLOUD • WASffiNGiON, D.C. A Professional Association W W W.LEONAAD.COM ' I-lau V& Phoung T Le May 24, 2007 Page 2 The terms and conditions of the Easement Agreement are clear and legally enforceable against you in a Court of Law. While we would rather not have to resort to enforcing my clients' rights through a lawsuit in a Court of Law, as it should be unnecessary (unless the tree dies) and will be very costly to you if you have been unlawfully altering or damaging any of the trees, shrubs or other foliage or Plantings in the Easement Area, my clients are very distraught over your apparent disregard for their legal rights and the damage you are causing in the Easement Area and they will take whatever action is necessary and appropriate to protect their rights and recoup their damages (again, especially if the tree dies). Please respond to this letter with a simple written letter (sent to my law offices at the address on this letter) acknowledging that you will no longer alter, damage or otherwise affect any of the trees, shrubs or other foliage of Plantings in the Easement Area. Failure to acknowledge your agreement to so abide by the terms of the legally enforceable Easement Agreement or any subsequent violation of the terms of the Easement Agreement, may also be met with legal action against you to enforce my clients' rights. Again, I hope that the tree doesn't die and we won't have to resort to a lawsuit and that you will siinply abide by the terms of the Easement Agreement (which is binding on you and your land, and will be binding on any future owners of your land). If you have any questions concerning the terms of the Easement Agreement, you may wish to contact the County Recorder's office for a copy of the Easement Agreement or you may wish to contact your own attorney, to make sure that you understand the binding legal nature of the Easement Agreement as it applies to you (even though you did not sign the Easement Agreement, the Easement Agreement is binding against you, as it was agreed to by the previous owner and is an agreement which binds future owners of the property as a recorded instrument in the public land records). Again, I would ask you to promptly respond to this letter in writing, acknowledging that you will no longer alter, damage or otherwise affect any of the trees, shrubs or other foliage of Plantings in the Easement Area in any way. Sincerely, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Paul C. Rachie Minnesota State Bar Association Board Certified Real Property Law Specialist PCR/Ijs c: Rick McLay and Pam Larkin " 31?f ? -/a35`? , . o 1-gHi -- w ? Wo w F ? ? 3 o ?z a ? ==-Q `?e ' e O ? ? 7 ? vf ? Y'iw . t? z m i C7 ? w U ? !L GC O mort'-?' ht O Z U " O ~0 a Y w o co ;? ? a Y ? .. cWi = y 3'oo Z c O U U ? G , X U LL? p7 QI z N x W ? a O ? F {y W m ? Ua p ?,?y (j O ?? W f; J W ? tn c7 , Q C Z V 6 O 3 ' O V>0 a LL ¢ Z U .. 460349 AMNDED A1VB itESTATED EASEN?NT AGTtL+'$Mlti`T r? ? n This Amcnded and Restated Easement Agreement (this "Agreemenfi.") is made this _day of February, 2002 by and between Lesch, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter rePerrod to as "Gran#or^ and Pamela E. Larkin and Richard D. MeLay, hereinafter referred to as "Grantees". The Grantor and C'srantaes are sometimes referred 4o herein as collectivcly as the "Parties". WHEREAS, Grantor is the fee owner of real property situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: ? Lot 1, Block 1, Cliff Woods of Eagan te£erred to herein as "Parcel X% WHEREAS, Grantees are the fee owners of the following described real property situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota legally describcd as follows: 1_< Lot 1, 131ock 1, Gataxie Hill Oaks referred to herein as "Parcel V'; WFiFsREAS, Parcel A and Parcel B are adjacent and contiguous parcels; WHEREAS, the previous owner of Parcel A granted Grantees an Easement recorded ? May 7, 2001 as documeiit no, 438985 in the real property records of Dakota County (the "prigfnal Easement Agreement"?; 'VVFif,REA5, the Original Easement Agreement provided for the ability of Grantees to plant and maintain trees and other foliage (the "Piantings") between the two parcels to act as a buffer providing privacy and other advantages (including aesthetic improvements) to both of the parcels; 2160358'u9 ?/ ? ??°Z-? . .. . : .. . . . ? .? and WHEREAS. the parties feel the Ptantings eye beneficial to both Parcel A and Parcel B; ? I WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the appropriate IoeafSon of the Easement Area of Parcel A(as defined below) needs to be adjusted as more fully set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideaation, the receipt arid sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by both parties, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1• The Original Easement Agreement is hereby suparceded in its entirety by this amended and restated Agreement, 2- Grantor (ierc3bq grants to the Grantees, their heirs, st2GCSSSOrs and assigns, 3 t etual , non-exclusive easement over and across the South twelve and one-half (12,5') feet t Uxe West nne hundred and fifty feet {I50'} of Parcel A described above (the "Easement Area"? for the benefit of Parcel ]3, for the pwpose o£ptauting and maintaining trees and S)uubs and other Plantings. 3. Grantees shall have the sole decision making rights and responsibilities for all aspects of the Plantings to be made and maintained in the Easement Area, both initially and in tha flztare, including the right to choose the hypes, style and density of Plantings, the light to plant either mature trees or plants or to plant seedlings, bulbs or any other type ofP3Antinp; provided, Grantees shaJl use reasonable efforts to minimize the impact the activity associated witii the installation and maintenance of the Plantings has on the owner of Parcel A, in particular, the eventual residentia3. owner of Parcel A, e.g., not using loud machinery for planting or maintcnznce iaYC at night, 4. Grantees shall make no material changes to fhe gradiap of the Easement Arca or any other material changes to the surface of the Easement Area which materially interferes with the drainage plan for Parcel A. IT Grantee diswrbs the surface of Parcel Ain breach of the foregoing, the owners of Parcel B shall reasonably restore the surface of Parcel A to substantially f.he sano.c condition as existed prior to the disturbance, 5. If any of the Plantings planted by (he owners of Parcel B dies or, in the opinion of a registered horkicnlturaTist, should be removed due to disease or damage, then the owners of Parcel H shall be responsible for removing said tree or plant. 6• The rights granted hereunder shall be limited to the piantiag and maintenance of trees and other foliage. In no event shall any permauent physical structure be constructed in the Easement Area by either Party. 7. The ownen of Parcel S shall indemnify the owners of Parcel A against any claim for personal injury or damage to property which occurs witivn the Easement Area as a direct result of its use by the owners ofPucel H. This indemnity shaTi include reasonshle aYtomeys 2160358v9 fees incurred by the owners of Parcel A in defending themselves in any action brought The ownezs oF Parcel B shall fiuther indemnify the awners of Parcel A against any mechanic's lien claim resulting from labor or material provided to the owncrs of Parcel B for the planting or znaintenanee of the F/asement Area. 8. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants and servitudes running vriih the land, burdening and benefiting, as appurtenances, Parcels A and S as specifically stated herein, and shall be binding upon and for tlxe benefit of the Parties aud their respective heirs, pcrsonal representatives, devisee9, administrators, tenants, successors and assigns, and zmy other persons 'Who hereafter acquire an interest in Parcel A or Parcel B by operation of law or other isgai mcans. Whenever a transfer of ownership of any of the percels occurs, liability of the transferor for breach of any covenants occurring thereafter shall automalicallytenninata, provided, however, such transferor shall remain liable for any obligations incurred prior ta such transfer. 9. Each of the Parties represents and wairants that it has the full capacity, right, power and autfiority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement, and all required actions, consents and approvals therefor havs bsen duly taken and obtained. Furthermore, each of the Parties represents and warrants that upon flil1 execution of tlvs Agrcexnnnt, dae real property provisions of this Ageeznent shall be binding on aIl parties with any intcresY in their respective Parcels. 10. The provisions of this Agreemeat are for thLe exclusive benefit of the Pazlies hereto and the.ir successors and assigns and not for the benefit of any third peison; and this Agreement confers no rights, exprecs or implied, upon any such thsrd person; and there are no "third party benafciaries" to this Agreement, 71. This Agreement may he signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute one instrument. 12. This Agreement represents the entire understanding between the Patties and all prior written or oral agreements are hereby declared null and void. Anywri#ten amendment to this Agreement shall only be effective when reduced to writing and said writing is signed by the owners of both Parcel A and Parcel 13. [Signature page follows-] 21G0358v9 lI4 W=SS WI-WREOF, the Parties have caused this document to be exeeuted on the day and year first written above. GIZAIVTOR: ;URa??r?.? a Minnesota corporation Its: GRANTEES: ? D. IvlcLsy STATE OF MRqNE$OTA ) }ss. COUNTY OF Larkin On this Z?i`?"day a£Fabruary, 2002, before me appeared ??,a.•.? ?.esc ?, the r?i a„ ? o£Lescg, inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of bfinuesota, who CXCCRtEd fh7S SIOCllIl]CIlt Ori Y7CI]8Lf of the GOI'pOCdti9tl. STATE OF IvZQqMgpTA } )ss. COUNTY OF s/:11? On ihiG'*day of February, 2002, before me Larkin, who executed this dociunent 4- JUOYM. JENRINS H0TA9Y PUBIlGMINNESpTA MyComMsslon EViresJan.31.2005 D. MoLay and Pamela E, 'rtus mfSlRUnrnt.trwa3 nztnFlE4 D'Y: l.&uusrd, Sfrers znd IIeinaxd (PCR) 250 Spitth FiBh Slreet., guita 2300 M;^?, MN 55402 216035" St75AN E. LACY NOTARY pUBM-MINUESOTA My Cpmircseion 6v"ves Jan. 31. M 2007RESIDENTIAL BUILDING rERMIT APPLICATION City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122 Telephone it 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 New ConsWCUon Requirements 3 regis[ered site surveys shavnng sq. ft of lot, sq, ft of haue; and aH roofed mm (20qo ma)dmum lot coverage 211owed) 7 Soils Report if proposed building is to be placed rn distuted soil 2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, etc. I set of Energy Calculafions 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan dbt Platted after 71153 Rim Joist Detail Optlons selecuon sheet (buildings with 3 or less units) Mnnegasco mechanical veritiWtiui fam Rwtodel/Repair Requirements 2 copies of plan shoving too6ngs, betim. joss 1 set of Energy Uculatlons for heated additions 1 site survey for aWi0ons 8 decks Addition -'mdicate Horhsile septic system 24 Q8? 7 90 , Z?6 Office Use OnIY CetofSwrvOyRood ?Y ?N Sods Report _ Y _ N Tree Pres Plan Recd _ Y _ N. Tree Pm Required _Y _N On-site Septic System _ Y _ N Plans are considered oublic information unless vou state thev are trade secret and the reason. Date Construction Cost Site Address ? p ?? f4- Unit/Ste # ?- l' . Description o Work Multi-Family Bldg _ Y/X-N Fireplace(s) 0 _ 1 _ 2 PropertyOwner /?al,t ? ?YlUII'TGC LP _ Telephone #(lp?? ) 75 coot,.aMOr MN WINDOWS & S1L^i:v?, ; . aaaress St t NDALE AVE. S. DWOMMiONg MN 554zu city Tele Zi hone#(%?) a e p p COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING - Minnesota Rules 7670 Category 1 _ Minnes f? Energy Code Category . Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet •??+' W? IS (d submission type) Submitted Subm . Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master _ Y _ N If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber Mechanical Contractor Sewer/Water Contractor Telephone # ( Telephone #( Telephone # ( I hereby apply for a Residential Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Applicant's Printed Na e Ann e 5( rei5 ApplicanPs Signature 1 . . . . . . , ' ' . . . . . . . , . , ~ ~ . . ' ' ' ' ' ~ . ~ . . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . . Q ~ . - . . . . . t ; ' , . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ , . ~ . . . . . . . . - ~ ' . . . . . . . . . ~ , . . . . . ~ ' . . . . ' , ' . O . . . NORTH . . . , ~ . . . . . ~ ~ , ~ . . : , ~ . . ~ . ~ . . ' . ~ . , . ' . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . I , ' , . _ ' . ' . . . . . ' . ~ . . . . , ~ I ' . . . ' . . . ' . ~ . . ~ . ~ . . . i , . ' . . . ~ . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . i . , ~ . . . . . ~ ' . . . , . . . ' . ' ' ~ I, . . ' . , , ' . ' . . . . . . . . , . i . . , ' ' , . ' . ~ , . . . . ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ . ~ ~ . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . ' I ~ ' ~ ' . ~ ~ ' . ~ ' . ~ . . , ' . , . . . . 1 . ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . I . . , . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ , . - • Denotes Iron Monument Found ' . . . ' , ~ , ' ~ . . . . . . , . . . ~ ' . . ' , . , . . ~ ' . o Denotes Iron Monument Set Scale 1 Inc~ = 10 Ft; ' ~ . ' ~ ' . ~ . ~ - . , . . - . ~ ~ . . . / O . . . , - " . . . ' . . . . . ' ~ . ' . . . , ~ . . ~ . , ~ . . . . ' ~ ~ . . ~ . . . . ' . ' . ~ . . . . . . ~ ' . . . . . ' . . ~ . . . . 7 J'. . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' . . . . ' . ~ . / . . \ . . • ~ ' . , . ' . . , . . . ~ ) . . . . ~ Property Description Lot . t, Biock 1, CUFF WOODS OF EAGAN . . . . . . W . . . . . . . ' . . ' ' . ' . , . . . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ . . . . ~ . . . . A . . ~ . . . . ~ . ' . . ' . . . . ' ' . ~ ' ~ ' 11/ /~~~/~f . . ' . ~ . . ' . . . . . , . , ' ' . , . . . . . . . . . ~V ' . , . ~ . . . . . , . . . ' . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . . . . . , ~ ' . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , h . ~ : ~ . . , ~ ' ~ . . ~ ~ . - ' Easement per poc. No. 438988 as amended by ~Doc, No. 460349 . . . . . . . r _ . _ . . . ~ _ . ~ _ . , : , . ~ . , ' ' ~ ' . ~ . . ~ ' . ' ~ . ~ ' . . . " ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . ~ . ..r. • . , • ~I ~~/~'~(/~f ' ~ . . ~ ~ ' ' ' . . ' . ~ : Easement agreement for maintenance ~ver the South 12 5 ~feet Qi~the _ . . . yV . ~ ....y.__... " . . _ " . . • . . ~ • ~ . . . ~ . , ' . ' . . ' . . : - West 150 feet of Lot 1, Block`1, CLIFF WOODS~J'i F~~G~a~~~ . . . . . - ~ ~ , . . . . / ~ . , . ' . . . , ' , ~ . . Q . ~ . . . . . ~ . . . . o ~ ~ o ~ : . _ . c,n 4612 ~ ~ „ 52.2 ~ 32,0 _ . Easement for MaintE . rn Edge of Wood Chips ~ment for Maintenance : , ~ . . . ~ . ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ . - N . ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ , ~ . . . . , ~ . ~ . . , . . ' ~ ~ 1 - . ~ ~ . ' ~ . ~ . 6 Sp uce 0• « _ ~ ~ ~ , - - - - - ~:-~-r . , - , - . y. . :.~~~:~_r:___ , ~ ~ - . . . . . ~ . . ~ ~ _ 6'; Sprace :2 . , , . , , • ~ ~ •'^r.~ • / •ao . . . . • N : ~ ~ i. , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ri. . . ~ Sp'tuce~ ~ a . . , , , , ~ • . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M N . ~ . ~ ' t ; ; • . , . . ~ ~ ~ . . Edge of Rocks ~i . . ; ~ , • . . , , . . . . . , . , . , . . ~ : , . . . • ~ ~ ~ O . ~ . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ . . . ~ . ~ . ~ . . . . • . . . . / • . : . . . • , 1:~ ~J' . ~ ~ , ~ . . . , . N . '1 ~ ' • . . ~•t . . . . . ...a. • . • , ~t . „ 1. . N ' ' ~ , ~ ~ . , ~ . . . ' . . . ../~S ' . . . . • , ' ~ , . S} ~ • ~ . • . . . . . o ~ . ~ . . ' , . ~ , „ . . , • . . . 3.9<~ ~j~'j~. , ~ . . . . : , . , - , . . \ ~~Y. . ' . . ~ ' . c~ . , • . , . . , . ' , • . ^j i • ' • z . ~ j \ ~ , ~ a, ~ ~ , , ).11 . a . ~ ~ o f ff , : ~,y . - ' > . ~'07"W ~ , ; . , . Edge. of Wood Chips ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ . . . . ' ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~D ~ . ~ . ~ N ~ . . ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ . , . . , ' . I . ~ ~ , ~ ~ . . . - N - . ' . . ~ . . . , ~ , . ~ \ ~ ~ I I . _ ~ I hereby certify that this survey, plon, or report was prepared by ~ - ~ ~ / me or under my direct supervision tind that.I am a duly registered / i . - _ _ ~ ~ Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota: W, BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. - 54.6 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 46,Q W. BROWN LAND SURVEYII~ 8030 Cetlar Avenue So., Suite 22 Bloomington, MN 55425 Woodrow A: Brown, R:k.S. MN REG 1523D . Bus: (952) 854=4055 . Fax:, (952) $54-4268 Dated; August 16 2005 CaWIYiq: nate: 8-12=05 , "ev 153-05 5calel inch = 10 Ft. , . , , , ; . PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing Permit Number:EA130427 Date Issued:04/23/2015 Permit Category:ePermit Site Address: 4612 Galaxie Pt Lot:1 Block: 1 Addition: Cliff Woods Of Eagan PID:10-17900-01-010 Use: Description: Sub Type:Residential Work Type:Replace Description:Water Heater Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection. Applicant: Troy Good 3670 Dodd Rd Eagan, MN 55123 Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$55.00 0801.4087 Surcharge-Fixed $5.00 9001.2195 $60.00 Total: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - Hau Le 4612 Galaxie Pt Eagan MN 55122 (651) 239-4244 Champion Plumbing 3670 Dodd Rd., #100 Eagan MN 55123 (651) 365-1340 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature . . ^ �'. Use BLUE or BLACK Ink � �________________� " I For Office Usggg � I � I � � Permit#: � I Clty of �a�� `,� - �� ; � Permit Fee: (/� 3830 Pilot Knob Road � I � - �� '�S � Eagan MN 55122 ' � Date Received: � Phone:(651)675-5675 I I Fax:(651)675-5694 I Staff: I � ------i 9 2015 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION C�� '�� Date: ��Z2��S SiteAddress: ��'�Z C�a1a►Xi� �('1'• Unit#: �� k�� r:f Name: ��1U1 L� Phone: (pS1 ' q&� � 2��2 � � ��f� ��ntJ �yy f Address/Cit�y/Zip: 41�12 (�q�uXie �1. Ec� c h N�N �5�22+ *�� Applicant is: �Owner Contractor �,. �.r� �� . � ° � � : �� Descriptionofwork: ��di'�q c� D�C� � �IVOCIC�'` �� k�� ` Construction Cost: Multi-Family Building:(Yes /No X ) r�� ,�� Company: ; �� ::. Contact: � �� .. � � �� '1�t`�C#��' . Address: City: �� x� _ �'� State: �ip: Phone: Email: � w � x�°� License#: Lead Certificate#: � .� �` If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: COMPLETIE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? Yes No If yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: ' Phone: Mechanical Contractor: Phone: Sewer&Water Contractor: Phone: Fire Suppression Contractor: Phone: NQT�^ an ��►sup�c�rtingr docu s a �subm�t� 'd�re�'" � � t � �£ ;tfie�nfQrr��n�r��e c/as's��ed as�� u�l`i�� ecrfPc �� u�d �f�c� rt �� x"�� - �� n.. ri � �� a, x �t� � �� ,.. ... -�_� � � � ��r �u� �,��.,,.� � �� .� � �or��l�s��:.rr tr � :�� . ��n�: ��.� � CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gbpher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.popherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a piermit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the;i case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a buildingl permit issued in accordance with the Minnesota Stat Building Code must be completed within 180 days of permit issuance. I x d �/�v'-'� �.l�i '' .._, � � ) ��. x ApplicanYs Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 l �°�� ` 1 x �- �� I'I� '� . DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE � � ,�9 SUB TYPES _ Foundation Fireplace Porch (3-Season) Ex rior',I It ration(Single Family) _ Single Family _ Garage _ Porch(4-Season) � Ex rior It ration(Multi) Multi Deck Porch(Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) Mi ellan o s 01 of_Plex Lower Level Pool Ac esso uilding WORK TYPES I New interior Improvement Siding De olis�B ilding* Addition Move Building Reroof De olish In erior _ Alteration _ Fire Repair _ Windows � De olis� F undation Replace Repair Egress Window W er D� ge _ Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building t giv PCA h n out to applicant DESCRIPTION r ' Valuation �C�J��. �" Occupancy C- 1 MCES Sys l m ', Plan Review Code Edition Zo �,�' SAC U'nits' ', (25%_100%_) Zoning �- ( City W�ate ' ' Census Code Stories Boost�r P'mp #of Units Square Feet PRV ' ', #of Buildings Length Fire S�pp ssic� equired Type of Construction �� Width ' ' REQUIRED INSPECTIONS � ' Footings (New Building) Meter Size: ' `P Footings (Deck) Final/C.O. Required ,I Footings (Addition) � Final/No C.O. Require I , Foundation HVAC Gas Service i st Gas Line Air Test Roof: Ice &Water Final Pool: Footings �A /Gas sts _Final �J Framing Drain Tile ' Fireplace: _Rough In _Air Test _Final Siding: _Stucco Lath ',I S� n Lath _Brick Insulation Windows Sheathing Retaining Wall: _Foo�ngs Backfill_Final Sheetrock Radon Control ! Fire Walls Fire Suppression: _R' ugh I Final Braced Walls Erosion Control ' Other: �' Reviewed By: �ow� 1f1(�.K��1 f�} , Building Inspector I RESIDENTIAL FEES I Base Fee Z � r � �� Surcharge :', Plan Review 3 a y S� . �'��''I �C' "�'` p o MCES SAC i City SAC , �I Utility Connection Charge ' S&W Permit&Surcharge Treatment Plant I Copies TOTAL I Page 2 of 3 Surz� e or ' s Certz zc a te � � � �� SURVEY FOR :RicK �EscH DESCRIBED AS : Lot 1, Block 1, CLIFF WOODS OF EAGAN, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota and reserving easements of record. ��N 16 REC'D ' r �N.�U-�J�^9�,�d 1�� 6�21(� i �� 9c�2, 9(o�E:�o ,\ 5.0 � \ .�59 ,p3 1 1 � � N CI7 . � ��\,�/��\� , / � , 56%� x" x ",x x x \\ ' i� X • X � 9c�5.a io I � 9frf1,1\ Ss,o �/ '�'k • I X " ; 9c�5,9 � "' � S i � 9t�1� v� $ '� � A 3�� q�a F h �� 9c�9,_ �22.0o N 9c�3,5 �� Fo �� Toesr yo � �''� " o �o ?�1� �� a 9 9� � �� `, 2.00 ,o.00 gc��9�g � 8 `�\ •� � I 4crA.q co3.l N Garage � \ �� / :�j ti a DroP 3cs. � qb5. � + � / Q�a � �7 0 � o � -,�� \�� / b 2.0o qt�3.1 � (p 9c�3.5 0 >>.50� °' k tl �9�3 � L x� �/1 o Proposed °' q�'� � � 2—Stor o i y 6.0 5 0 2.00 8'pcw y 11. 9b3.9 ,�`��F�X \\ V +� ��., � 9��'-9 n-r 2.00 16i0 9e^..� , o '/ 0 N � o �JG+ \ I � � o } � Z � � P �-�`"'" rn 32.00 �� pO 9�� 3 (9fo3. o '1/ x ° � o � — � rv+ — — — — �\h 968, . . _. . —t,,. �_—� � —�i(�3. — —9[�3• -9�04. 959,'2 --_— -- _ x - - --- �� — - - - - - - - - - -� �5 .00 " $ � 954� N89°53'07��E 230.11 —� 9�a, 954.o N 24.0 1.5 W , � 5.5 ■ t 4�� W By:- -;`' �'�" ,�':�'=�� 969,7 -------�969,� � � , Date: �.....,=�r....� iJ Exfst Home i Eagan Building Inspections Division TOB = 968.7 i L0T SQ. F00TAGE _ �9, 80� HSE. SQ. FDO TA GE = 2, 239 LOT COVERAGE _ � �� PROPOSED ELEVATIONS BENCHMARK, C,P, 6alqxie. Top of Foundation = 9c,5,� Garage Floor o�op3�-q�3,2 Fi��=959.sa Basement Floor =q5-r,7 Aprox. Sewer Service =q55.3± Proposed Elev. _ � MIN. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Existing Elev. _ Drainage Directions = Front - House Side - Denotes Offset Stake = . scA�E: � ��n e 3o f��t Rear - Garage Side - i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION J08 N0: HEDL[/ND �F THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS SURVEYEO 01R-580 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. BOOK: PAGE: _ PL.9NNINC BNCINEERINC SURVEYINC 2005 Pin Oak Drive 1 n � • Eagan, MN 55122 DATE 1�/��/Q� Z�� CAD FILE: Phone: (651) 405-6600 F Y D. LINDGREN, LA SURVEYOR Cliff Woods Fax : (651) 405-6606 N TA LICENSE NU ER 14376 � �