The URL can be used to link to this page

4120 Lexington Way2006 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN MN 55122 651-675-5675 ? ; 3a C)o Date)_/ a-G / 06 / ? SiteAddress ?d-Q LL /W KJ Unit# Tenant Name 44?4 /IRL- ? Former Tenant Name FA rty Ovc ner Telephone #actor ddress City State ZiP Telephone # (IjST ) License # L/a- / S PYVL Expires: d-- ?i The AppGcant is _ Otvner -39 Contractor _ Other Work Type New Bldg _ Modify Space _ Irrigation System•• _ Yes No Work in public ro-w / easement? RPZ PVB: New _ Repair/Rebuild _ Replace _ Remwe Raiu sensors are re uire,nd on irriation s stems Description of Work /7/l A/fO?c ?/+'? ? J??"^^ To inqu've if Pressum Reducing Valve is required on new service, call 651-675-5646 Meter3 - Call 651-675-5300 to verify that hydrostatic, conductivily, and bactena tests passed orior to picldne uo meter. Ircigation Size & Type Avg GPM 2" [urbo req'd unless smaller size allowed by Public Works Fire Size & Pdce 3/4" meter $167.00 Domestic Size & Type Avg GPM Includes high demand devices? _ 1'es _ No Flushometers A Yes _ No PRV Required _ Yes ?4 No Permit Fee $50.50 minimum (includes State Surcharge) Contract Value $ x l% = g y? •?? PermitFee g Meter(s) Requued on all new buildings & boulevard 'urieation svstems $ Radio Meter Read $ State Surctiarge If oemut fee is less than $1,000, surchu'ge is $.50 If Dermit fee is more than SI,000, sttrcharge ia 5.50 for each 51,000 owed. Fallowing fces apply when ins[alling new lawn irrigation system $^ Water Peitnit Call the City's Engineering Department, 651-675-5646, for requued fee amounts $ Treatment Plant g Water Supply & Storage g State Surcharge g Total Fee __??. e..A ??M?.n?P? lhat the work will be in conformance w?11i the lication for a pean4 and work is mt lo I hae6y apply for a Commercial Plumbing Yemvt ana acrsowienge mai ine nuU11+?.w%L 13 CO...r.... ---.---? -- -- ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Plumbing Codes; that I undersland this is nof birt ody an app stnrt without a pertnit; thaf the work will be in accordance with ti?e approved plan in the case of 'ves a reviey?Sj1?' rov plans. / // Ym ?l ll/ Applicant's Printed Name A uanPs Signature CITY USE ONLY REQ[JII2ED INSPECTIONS: _ U.G. Air Test _ Gas Test ?Rough In ? Final PLANS SUBNIITTED APPROVED BY: 6 T '1- ? G?? . BUII.DING INSPECTOR General Information • Radio Meter Read (required on all new buildings. Boulevard irrigation systems may require a radio read -$141.00 • RPZ's must be tes[ed every yeaz and rebuilt every five years. Tes[ results should be mailed to Paul Heuer at the City of Eagan. . A miniroum fee pemdt per address is required for the following RPZ's: new, rebuild, reoair, remove. • Water meters include wpper hom/strainer, remote wire, and touch-pad meter. METERS REOUII2ING 4-HOUR ADVANCE NOTICE PRIOR TO PICK UP GPM METERS USE PRICE GPM METERS USE PRICE 1-20 5/8" residenlial $130.00 4-120 1-1/2" irrigation syst $ 827.00 displacement or turbine" Public Works maximuin small commercial must approve continuous meter size 10 2-30 3/4" lawn irrigation $167.00 4-160 2" turbine lazge irrigation S 1,040.00 maximum displacement residential system & cominuous or producrion lines 15 small cammercial 3-50 1" displacement lazge residential $210.00 1/4 to 160 2" compound bldgs over $ 1,962.00 bldg to 24 units 65 units Inammum small commercial & continuous & large comm bldgs ZS im tion stems 5-100 1-1/2" 25-64 unit bldgs $515.00 maximum displacement & continuous most comm bldgs 50 METEA5 REOUIRING 30-DAY ADVANCE NOTICE PRIOR TO PICK UP GPM METERS USE PRICE GPM METERS USE PRICE 5-350 3" turbine very lazge irrigaUion $1,394.00 6-500 4" compound +300 unit bldgs $3,864.00 system & production & very large lines comm bldgs 1/2-320 3" compound +200 unit bldgs $2,516.00 10-1000 6" compound +400 unit bldgs $6,436.00 very lazge very large comm bldgs comm bldgs 15-1000 4" turbine very lazge $2,495.00 irrigation syMemc & production lines %-ommencs • To schedule inspection of the inside water line and bacldlow preventer, call 651-675-5675. • To azrange for water tum-on, ca11 6 5 1-675-5200. cc: Utility Division Sys[ems Malyst January 2006 2006 COMMFRCIAL BUILDING rExNUT ArrLicaTTON ? City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Mn 55122 Telephone 4 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 • Structural Plans (2) sets • Civil Plans (2) . Certifcate of Survey (1) . CodeMalysis (1) " . ProjectSpecs (1) • Spec. Insp. & TesGng Schedule " • SoilsReport (1) . Meter size must be eshablished 1 L 1 1 1 1 • SAC detertnination - call 651-602-1000 . Architectu2l Plans (2) sets . Structural Plans (2) • Civil Plans (2) . Landscaping Plans (2) • CodeMalysis ('I) " . Certificale of Survey (1) • Spec.lnsp.&TestingSchedule (1)" • Meter size must be established • Prqec[Specs (t) . EnergyCalculaGOns (t) " • ElecVic Power & Lighting Form " (t) • Master Exit Plan (1) . Emergency Response Site Plan (1) •" • Soiis Report (1) • SAC determination - ca11 651-602-1 000 • Fire Stopping Submiit215 • CodeAnalysis "-?4) " . ProjectSpecs (?) • KeyPlan (1) • Master Exit Plan (1) • Energy Calculations (1) not always" • Elec. Power & Lighting Form (1) not always" • Meter size must be established-if applicable l 1 1 1 1 • SAC detertnination - call 651-602-1000 Call MN Dept of Health at 651-201-4500 for details regarding food & beverage or lodging facilit Contac[ Building Inspections for sample and if required '** Percnit for new building or addition will not be processed without Emergency Response Siie Plan. Date 4e Construction Cost / s?'? 000. - Site Address -o e UnitlSte # Tenant Name ? Pa L--? ?I?G///y/}7e-/? rmer Tenant Name /Y M445/ Description of Work K, o KT haL e?l e 44 Property Owner MOknl/e Telephone #(os( ) a28 °( ?oL 63 i ? ? S q -$ b p `?? ? Applicantis: _ Owner ? Contractor Q . ?6 li?n o '-1 Contact#: ((y5 J Contractor Gi Cl a cu o p I? Address 5 a11., rl( S ' 60? City at4 State , /t A: ?1 ?I .f _%&4 ? Zip ?j S ( a?1 Telephone # (Cf 5- a- ?-?P T , Arch/Engr /r (0 41 ot v1,SP,1 ?? ??ce Vc, ti,, ( G?,?,J Registration # ?O ? 7 y Address B11) d -SKlc,? Cb City State 1N I ?i , Zip _S.S .3 7 j Telephone # `) 8S Licensed plumber installing new sewerlwater service: . Phone #: L? 1)116 I hereby apply for a Commercial Building Permit and acknowledge that the informarion is complete and accurate; that the work will be in confonnauce with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an applicarion for a pemut, and work is not to start without a pemut; that the work-will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a teview and approval of plans. ? ?-.-? I )V-fV i in ? . ' .' k C e _ Applicant's Printed Name J Applicant's Signature DO NOT WRI'i'E BELOW THIS LINE Sub Types ? Ol Foundation ? 14 Aparhnents ? 15 Lodging ? 25 Miscellaneous Work Types ? 31 New ? 32 Addition ? 33 Alteration ? 34 Replacement ? 26 Public Facility ,e27 CommerciaUlndustria] ? 28 Greenhouse ? 29 Antennae ? 30 Accessory Building ? 32 Ext Alt-Apartments G 34 Ext Alt-Commercial ? 35 Ext Alt-Public Facility ? 37 Nail Salon ,,2r'?35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 37 Demolish (Bldg)* ? 43 Reroof ? 46 Windows/Doors 'Demolition (Enttre Bidg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant i pZ o00 ? /5-y Valuat on j Plan Rev 100% t/ 25% _ SAC Units - D '- Nbr. of Units ? Nbr. of Bidgs Type of Const ;:v: g Width Occupancy ? ? MCES System Zoning ? City Water ? Stories ? Booster Pump Sq. Ft. SS? ? PRV ? Length Fire Sprinklered Required Inspections _ Foofings (new bldg) _ Footings(deck) _ Footings(addirion) _ Foundauon Drain Tile _ Driveway Apron Roof Ice Pr _ Decking _ Insul Fnming F'ueplace t/ R.I. v/Air Test VeFinal Insulation Sheetrock FinallC.O. FinallNo C.O. Other Final _ Pool Ftgs Air/Gas Tests Final _ Siding _ Stucco Lsth _ Stone Iath _ Final Windows Final CIO Inspectio edule Fire Marshal to be present. Yes ?No Approved By: Planning 01&k-Building Inspector Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review SAC-MCES SAGCity SIW Permit SIW Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedica6on Trait Dedication Water Quality Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Financial Guaran?-- Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Lateral SUeet Water Lateral Other 7otal 2/ 74 -49 Sewer Trunk Water Trunk 1273.7f 71.a-e 27-QyG MANLEY Commercial, Inc. 19 15 Pla7a Dmve, Suite 20 I Eagan, MN 551 27 Phone 65I 289 5263 Fax 651 289 4329 wwvro rnarneycommeraal com 12-14-06 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Building InspecYions Let it be known that three handicap accessible doors have bee ordered from Madison Supply for 4120 Lexington Way, permit # EA074333. (See attached contract) The doors aze to arrive on January 17, 2007 and will be immediately installed. January 18, 2007 is the expected completion date. Sincerel osh Anderson Manley Commercial, Ine. , ?D CUSTOMER NAMElADDRESS DATE: 9121106 Manley Commercial Company 1915 Plaza Dr Suite #201 Egan, MN 55122 contact = Josh Anderson Manle Phone:651-210-7958 SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED Madison Supply to remove qty (3) Hurd 3-0 out swing doors (front entry, vestibule and west side door) and replace with (2) Hurd 3-2 x 7-2 clad white outswing doors and (1) Hurd 3-0 x 7-2 clear natural wood outswing door with handicap threshold at the Manley office building located at 4120 Lexington Way Egan, MN. Madison Supply to replace existing trim boards around door poors to be re caulked and sealed. Installation includes re-insulating around door. Doors to have grilles in air space to match existing doors. New doors wiil look the same as existing only 2" wider. Doors to have single bore only, no hardware included in contract. No paint stain or finish work included in contract. CONTRACT PRICE. $ 5805.00 PAYMENT TERMS: 0% down balance at com letion Madison Supply, Inc. is nol re:sponsi6le for cleaning glass or windows being insialled as part of [he Projecl. Madiwn Supply, Inc. is responsible for clean up and hauling away of materials used in connection with the Project, any windows removed as part ot'the Project, and debris created by Madison Supply, Inc. in connection wilh the Project. The Cus[omer is responsible for ALL labor aod mxterials for painting, staining, and finish work. Special order items may not be rewmed. Whcn installing jobs that require new interior W m. Madison Supply will supply with the closest possible maroh and profile. Casings and interior [rims may not always be an exact match. Allow 5 to 6 week lead time for project [o start from time of contract signing and down payment Pricing void if contract not executeJ with in 30 days of above daze. NOTICF, OF MECHANIC'S LIEN RIGHTS THE FOLLOWING NOTICE IS PROVIDED TO YOU AS REQUIRED BY LAW: (a) Any person or company supplying labor or materiais for this improvement to your property may file a lien against your property if that person or company is not paid for the contributions. (b) Under Minnesota Law, you have the right to pay persons who supplied labor or materials for this improvement directly and deduct this amount from our contract price, or without the amounts due them from us until 120 days after completion of the improvement unless we give you a lien waiver signed by persons who supplied any labor or material for the improvement and who gave you timely notice. I have read the terms on t¢iityA(dt??luding following page, I find such terms satisfactory & herby accept them. INSTALLATION CONTRACT &R`7 I?l MAY g 9 2005 2005 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Mn 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 • 9ffiiUOr21P am-?-? iU (2) sets • Civil Plans (2) • Certificate of Survey (1) . CodeAnalysis (1) "• . Prqect Specs (1) • Spec. Insp. & Testing Schedule " • Soils Report (1) . Meter siza must be established 1 1 1 1 1 1 . SAC detertnination - call 651802-1 000 • ArchRedurel Plans (2) set • Strudural Plans (2) • Civil Plans (2) . Landscaping Plans (2) • CodeAnatysis (1) " • CeAificate of Survey (1) . Spec. Insp. & Testing Schedule (1) " • Meter size must be established . ProjectSpecs (1) . EnergyCalculations (1) " • Electric Power & Lighting Fortn (1) " . Master Ezit Pian (1) • Emergency Response Stte Plan (1) • SoilsReporl (1) . SAC determinalion - call 657-602-1 000 . . 42i?u,uq `V, C:MA_L_> • ArohRedural Plans (2) sets . CodeAnalysis (1) ° . ProjectSpecs (1) . KeyPlan (i) • Master Exit Plan (t) • Energy Calculations (1) nol always'" • Elea Power & Lighting Fortn (1) not always" . Meter size must be established-if applicable 1 1 1 d 1 . SAC determination - call 651-602-1000 Call MN Dept of Health at 651-215-0700 for details regarding food & beverage or lodging facilities. •* Contact Building Inspections for sample and if required '* * Pertnit for new building or addition will not be processed without Emergency Response Site Plan. Date e15- / __!P? / 65- `?1_20 Constructian Cost a0 0•cx.) Site Address z" ? ? ?,?AG???9r/ Unit/Ste #ON14 , Tenant Name ??L} / 101 Former Tenant Name 4 GcILo n( a Description of Work //nu Praperty Owner Aad?u 214a Telephone # Contractor 4i1/vf Address Q CitY State /ylls/ Zip ssiaa Telephone #(/6y ) Arch/Engr N6?(?y? Registration # Address /?Jl?r?.,fy/- City State AW Zip 937_?/`/ Telephone # (9So1) 3 0. erS Licensed plumber instal ling new sewer/water service: Phone #: f_? ) FS`?? ?° yy I hereby apply for a Commercial Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Applicant's Print d Name Applica ' ignature OFFICE USE ONLY Sub Types ? 01 Foundation ? 14 Apartrnents ? ] 5 Lodging ? 25 Miscellaneous ? 26 Public Facility [3' 27 CommerciaVlndustrial ? 28 Greenhouse ? 29 Antennae ? 30 Accessory Building ? 32 Ext Al[-Apartments ? 34 Ext Alt-Commercial ? 35 Ext Alt-Public Facility ? 37 Nail Salon k Types V 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding ? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair ? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish (Bidg)` ? 43 Reroof ? 48 WindowslDoors ? 34 Replacement 'Demolition (Entire Bldg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant Valuatfon ?S0 0 ooa °-° Occupancy 4-3_ MCESSystem ye's CensusCode 32? Zoning CityWater e?, S SAC Units Stories Booster Pump - Nbr, of Units ? Sq. Ft. .S? PRV - Nbr. of Bldgs ? Length Fire Sprinklered y/es Type of Const ? .g Width (oq lg /, Required Inspections ? Footings (new bldg) ? Insulation _ Footings(deck) .i FinaVC.O. Footings (addition) Final/No C.O. ? Foundation Other Drain Tile ,i Roof _ Ice Pr _ Decking _ Insul Final Pool Ftgs AidGas Tests Final ? Framing _ _ _ Siding _ Stucco _ Stone _ Fireplace _ R.I. _ Air Test _ _ Final _ Windows Approved By: Planning -- ------------------ ?'?- ?• Building Inspector --- ------ ---------- ------------------------------------ ------- ---------- ----- --------- Base Fee ?1,833, -7s ? ------• Surcharge ? ( 2S, 00 ? Plan Review I 19 I , g-8' ?i`- ? ? MCES SAC ??qDO .UD City SAC Water Supply & Storage (WAC) -- S/W Permit I DD.OD ? S/W Surcharge . 50 TreatmentPlant ?S3Co.00 -?-? Park Dedication Traiis Dedication Water Quality Copies ?-- Water Trunk - Sewer Trunk ---, Other '-' Total ? f2t\ S1ln. 6?9 ? n r 2005 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION CTI'Y OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN MN 55122 651-675-5675 DateZ? Site Address 4170 LPY/?? /n h4c/ " Unit # Tenant Name ?GYyi/r?E/1L?9C D/I?E//?f I,l/ Former Tenant Name NUA/FC i PropertyOwner 191A&L/ O/,3?,'?i'-z'eleptione#(lj,?) Contractor /741? Address &? City State zip .SS3 Telephone#(9.5-0) q?I ??lyy? License #Eapires: lz 3 5 T6e AppGcant is _ Owner Coniractor _ Other Work Type X New Bldg _ Modify Tenant Space RPZ PVB New Repair/Rebuild _ Replace _ Irrigation system Work within public right of-way/easement _ Yes _ No Rain sensora are reuired on irriation a stems. Description of Work P?UlhgIN RJ IfNLZ /U T?1 /'3-241 1X,Yl7 To inqu've if Pressure Reducing Valve is requved on new service, ca11651 -675-5646 Metere - Call 651-675-5300 to verify that hydrostatiq wnductiviTy, and bacteria tests passed orior to oickine uo meter. Irrigadon Size & Type Avg GPM 2" turtw req'd unless sroaller size allowed by Public Works Fire Size & Price 3!4" disulacement $161.00 Domes[ic Size & Type Avg GPM Includes hig6 demand devices? _ Yes _ No Flus6ometers Yes No PRV Required _ Yes _ No Permit Fee $50.50 minimum (includes State Surcharge) Contract Value $3 (JOU x 1% _$ 50 Permit Fee ? $ Meter(s) Required on all new buildmgs & boulevazd 'uxi a?hon svstems $ Radio Metei Read If permit fee is $1,000 or leas, surcharge is $.50 $ "60 State Swcharge If perm[t fee in over $1,000, surcharge ls 5.50 per $1,000 o[the Permit Fee Following fees apply only when installing new irrigatioa system $ ? Water Permit Call Jerty W obschall at 631675-5024 for requ'ved fee amowVs $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge ---------°---------------------------------------------------------------------°------------------------------------------------ $ ?!J< .'??c7 Total Fee I hereby apply for a Commercial Plumbuig Yemut and acknowledge mat tne mtoimauon is compieLe ana accmnic, ??? .. w-n w.u ?c u. confonnance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Plumbing Codes; that I understand this is not a pemiit, but only an application for a permit, and vrork is not to sfart without a pemtit; that the work will be in accordance with the appro plan in the case of work wlilch requires a review and approval of plans. :& ?4G1?7Z I Appl?s Printed Name ?pG Ys Si ?alure CITY USE ONLY REQi7IRED INSPECTIONS: ? U.G. ? Air Test _ Gas Test ? Rough In y _ Final PLANS SUBMITTED APPROVED BY: BUILDING INSPECTOR General Information • Radio Meter Read (required on all new buildings c& boulevazd irrigation systems- $141.00 • RPZ's must be tested every yeaz and rebuilt every five years. Test results should be mailed to Paul Heuer at the City of Eagan. • A roinimum fee permit per address is required for the following RPZ's: new, rebuild, renair, remove. • Water metera include copper hom/strainer, remote wire, and touch-pad meter. METERS RE UIRING 4-HOUR ADVANCE NOTICE PRIOR TO PICK UP GPM METERS USE PRICE GPM METERS USE PRICE 1-20 5/8" residenlial $125.00 4-120 1-1/2" irrigation Syst $ 735.00 displacement sm commercial turbine** Public Works maxtimum must approve continuous meter size 10 2-30 3/4" lawn irrigaUOn $161.00 4-160 2" hubine Ig irrigation syst $ 931.00 maximum displacement residential & continuous sm commercial production lines 15 3-50 1" displacement very]g res $296.00 1/4 to 160 2" compound bldgs over $ 1,849.00 bldg to 24 uniu 65 units maximum sm commercial & continuous & ]g comm bldgs 25 irci tlon stems 5-100 I-1/2" bldgs 25-64 units $429.00 maxmum displacement & continuous most comm bldgs 50 METERS REOUII2ING 30-DAY ADVANCE NOTICE PRIOR TO PICK UP GPM METERS USE PRICE GPM METERS USE PRICE 5-350 3" turbine very Ig irrigation $1,182.00 6-500 4" compound +300 unit bldgs & $3,563.00 syst & production very Ig comm bldgs lines 1/2-320 3" compound +200 unit bldgs $2,282.00 10-1000 6" compound +400 unit bldgs $6,076.00 very Ig comm bldgs very Ig comm bldgs 15-1000 4" tur6ine very Ig irrigation $2,226.00 syst & production lines n,...,...,._ ._ Yfl?rl?W • To schedule inspection of the inside water line and bacldlow preventer, ca11 65 1-67 5-5675. • To amange for water tum-on, call 651-675-5300. c¢ Maintenance Division Clerical Technician Januazy 2005 L 2006 COMMERCIAL P UMBING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN MN 55122 651.675-5675 ?4K,9 Date ? / 17 Site Address /'2 C) G-2 f` r' la n?? Unit # TenantName OG("W l ? FormerTeoantName Anlt,/ ? hone # ( ) $ Tele ?'t I `/? ?? iWE p ! Property Owner / t ( 1 OG 4 ? ContraMOr • " Addresa ?t .? / U U-`+-? ri'l U C- City State v? Zip ?q v Telephone # VI 9) 0 Liceuse # L111J Expires: / U The Applicant is _ Owner ? Conhsctnr _ Other Work Type New Bldg _ Modify Space _ Irrigadau System"* )CYes No Work in public r-o-w / easementT ? RPZ _ PVB: )4 New Repair/Rebuild Replace _ Remove Rain sensore are requWd on irri tion stems Description of Work 0. To mquire if PAissure Reducmg Valve is mqu'ved on new service, call 651fi75-5696 Meters - Ca11 65 1-675-5 3 00 W verify tfiat hydrostatic, conductivity, and 6acteria tests passed odor to oickine uo meter. Imgation Sizc & Type _ Avg GPM 2° babo req'd unless smaller size allowed by Puhlic Works Fire Size & Price /4" meter 1$67.W Domestic Size & Type Avg GPM lncludes high demand dev[cea7 _ Yea _ No Flushometers Yes No PRV Required _ Yes _ No Permit Fec $50.50 mrrdnoan (includa Stnte Surchsrge) Contract Value $ x I% _ $ 50 • 6v PennitFee $ 'JFIS , vo Meter(s) Aaquired on all new buildmgs & boulevard'vriealion svstems $ O 0 Radio Meter Read $ .50 State Surcharge ??? .?- 2uC??D ?CQC8 IfpermitfxislesalhanS1,000.sorchargeisS50 2- If ermit fce e more t6ao $3,000, enrcharge is $.50 Por weh $3,000 owed. Follow(ng fees apply when instslling new lawo irrlgatian ryetem $ Water Permit CaII the Cit}/s Engiaeering Department, 651-675-5646, for mquired fee amoontc $ TreatrnentPlant ? / O Wata Supply & Storage $ ? Sfl State Surcharge $ Total Fee I fiereLv arolv far a Co=mneicial Plumbme Pertnit en(i aclmowledRe ihat the infotmetion is coxpkUs?d eccmate: thet the worlc will be m eonfoRnance with the mdinances and codes of the City of Fagen eud wilh the Plum6ing Codes; Iha[ I undetsmnd ? ?s nol a p '; but only m epplicalion fb am?4 ana wom Is nm m star[ wiNout a petmit; [hat the work will6e in ac? ce with the approved plan in We ofwork w requires a review end v oF sns. _ . )drn g' 5 ?^?I ??" / ? L??S Gw, App canCs Printed Neme App nt's Signature 2006 COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 Please complete for. commercial/industrial buildings muiti-family buildings when sepazate pertnits are not required for each dwelling unit 4 No 25 Date ?b /-6 /OIP Site Street Address4(2-D Unit tf Tenant Name (if applicable) a-tiliAs 1 77- Previous Tenant Name Property Owner 1 ? Telephone # Contractor BlNDER HEATING & AC, INC I street ndflress So• St. Peul, MN 55075 City _ 651457-8781 State Zip Telephone # ( ) _ Bond#t: Qp? ?1d2,3r0 Expires: '6 113I O? / The Applicant is _ Owner V Contractor _ Other Work Type New Construction --,,/Interior Improvement _ Install Piping _Processed _?,/Gas UnderlAbove ground Tank 2install • Remove When installing/removing fank(s), call for inspection by Fire Marshal and Plumbing Inspector Nature of Work: Vv ?J P¢rmit Fees: $70.50 Underground tank mstallanon/mmoval 550.50 Minimum (indudes State Surcharge) Contract Value $ x 1% / _ $ + Permit Fee $ StateSurcharge If cermit fee is less than $1,000, add $.50 If permit fee is more thsn $1,000, surchuge ? is $.50 far every $1,000 owed. 34p?25 $ ? Total Fee I hereby appty for a Commercial Mechanical Pevnit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Mechanical Codes; that I understand this is no[ a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in acwrdance with the oved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. ? ?? Applicanfs PrintedName'Applican4s Signature Approved By: ]nspector Date: Required Inspections: _ U.G. ?I. _ Air Test Gas Service Test _ Infloor Heat _ Final FRCM : RSE I PHONE ND.,;: 95`24432251 ? Rug. 16 2006 05:34PM P2 ? HEATING AVn C00LING BLOCK, LOAD PR038CT:' NANi.Y DEDBEOPMBiT OPFIC?: , PRO.IBCT VO. i BIL$. NAMP.: F?7D1.LF,6 i i ; DATt: 8=18-06 k ? ? if !r j; I +.e W iF e4 ?R 1k ?:. At ir {t ir * t:? 'X 4 h ?4 I;VIT NO: AH-1 VENT AL R CEM:' 102, iNU^7SBR OP P80PLE: 6 PLDOR ARBA: 1018 ; CpM/SF:' 0.98 'LIGHTIN G W/SF: 2.0 0 DESIGh CONDITSONS ? _ _ -- - - - - - - _ _ _ - - - - ' _ _ _ _ _ = :. _ _ _ _ . _ .. _ _ - ii SUMLriER OUTSIDE ii - INSID$ - - - - - - - - DIPPEASNCE ? - - - ^ - - - DAZ?Y RANGE - - - - - - 22 ARYHULB 92 ? 74 18 LATXTllDE 44 WPTBULB 75 ? 62 13 * DES,TGN TIME 4 Pw GR/LB 104 64 40 ? NSATHER 3TA 1? 3:8 WINTER -19 I 72 91 r * MPL$./3T. P AUL, MIv _ - _ _ T __ _ _ ? ? W ? _ _ _ _ ? _ L. .. ^ ^ ? HBAT LOS5 TOTALS ?' - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ HEAT CAI1V TOTALS _ _ LATBNT L SBATSIBLL i $ TUH ? _ . _ _ _ TONS, _ - ' - - ' TONS TRANSMISSION 9532 TRANISMI3SIOZi - 1.06 ? INFILTRATI6N 538 INPILTRATIOIQ O.Ob 0.00 LIGHTS 0.58 I PBOPLE 0.13 APPLTANCES 0.0? 0.00 MOTOR - i 0.09 VENTILATYON 1 0070 ` VEI3TILATION 0.23 0.17 TOTAL 7142 TOTALS ' 0.33 2.01 TaTAL + 15% - - - - - - - - - 2713 - - ^ - - TOTAL (S +"L') - - - - - - - - - - 2.35 CALC - - - ?^ _ _ 2.5 SELECTED _ AFR DISTR7Bi7TION - _ _ ^ - - - - - OR 4 PM - - _ . _ _ _ _ - - 20IQE CPM HxG - - CPM CLG . _ _ - _ ' _ • _ - - CPM H&C CPMJSP HTG - - - - - - - CPM/SF CLG _ _ ' _ _ - CFN_/SP H&C 1 121 160 225 206 0.98 11.38 1.27 2 120 245 i 270 248 1.06 1,.17 2.07 3 119 116 104 106 0.89 01.80 0.81 4 117 116 ? 104 106 0.89 0.80 0.81 5 114 116 ? 104 106 0.84 0?.80 0.81 6 113 245 189 225 1.06 0'.82 0.97 - ' _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - UNiT SCHEDULE _I _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ - _ AE9x4N HBAT (MBH) _ - - - - DESIGN - - - - - - SSLECTED UNIT CPM ( CPM MINIMUM MAXXMUNI COOL COOL PFO. SUPYLY u QA IN/OUT IN/OLJx TONS TOTv`5 AH-1 1000 Ii ? II 102 46 / 37 ! 53 / 42 2.35 i 2.5 ? , FRCIM : RSE PHONE NO.?: 9524432251 : Rug. 16 2006 05:34PM P3 HEATTNG'AND ?OOLTNG BLOCK?,LOAD PR0,IECT: MAyLBY DEVELOPMEh'T OPPTC PROJLCT ?IO: F]:LE VAMk: FMD2.LF:6 DAT?: 8-16-06 I .. UNIT N0: AH-2 I VENT AIR CPM: 204 ?IIMBBR OP PEOPLB: 12 FLOAR AREA: 2453 I I CFM/SP: 0.82 LICHTIN G W/SB: 1.81 - - - - - - - - - CONDITIDNS DESIGN - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ i - - - _ _ _ ` _ _ _ _ SLCMMER 0[ITSIAB I zN3IDS UIFPBRENC,B * AATLY RANG6 22 DRYHIItB 92 ? 74 1$ LATTTUDB 44 WETBGLS 75 ! i 62 13 * DS3TGN TTiHE 1 FM GR/LB 104 64 40 * WBATHER STA 1F .S WINTER -19 - - - - 72 - - 91 - - - - - - - - - MPL5./ST. PAIIL, NN - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - HEAT LOSS TUTALS ' - HEAT GAIN TOTALS LATENT SENSIBC,£ _ i - - - - - - - _ - - .? ' .: - - _ - - - - _ ^ - - _ ' ^ - - ?TUH V. T6NS' TONS TRAIGSMISSION 16243 TRANSMTS`S IOIQ - 1.02 INPILTRATION ?1639 INR'ILTRAT IOB 0.00 0.00 LIGHTS _ 1.26 I pEOPLB 0.20 0.25 I APPLIANCE S 0.00 1.17 ? MOTOR _ ? 0.18 VENTILATIOPT 20141 'p 0VENTILATI ON 0.46 0.33 TOTAL 48024 TOTALS ; 0.66 4.21 TOTAL + 15% S5228 i ?OTAL (S + L) 4.87 CALC 5 SELECTED _ ' _ _ _ _ - ? AYR DISTRISC7TTON ? _ _ ? - ^ ,_ OOR 1 PN! .. - - _ ... _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ZONE CFN HTCr V CFM CLG r CPN H&C C FM/5F HTG CFM/{SP CLG r CFM/SF H&C 1 118 121 77 94 b.72 0.46 0.56 2 122 lII ; 152 118 0.61 0.84 0.65 3 125 102 i 134 104 ' 0.61 0.80 0.62 G 127 288 794 616 0.61 ?.69 1.31 5 105 78 j 49 60 0.61 6.39 0.47 6 lUG 180 i 109 139 ?.44 0.87 1.12 7 110 170 I 106 132 1.36 0.85 1.06 8 ill 217 I 106 168 1.74 U.85 1.35 9 112 217 106 " 168 ? 5.74 0.85 7.35 la 107 158 100 ' 122 , 0.61 39 0.47 il 309 119 75 92 0.61 .39 0.47 12 108 119 75 92 0.61 d.39 0.47 13 11.5 57 i 55 44 0.61 d.59 0.47 14 116 57 Y ? 55 /i4 0.61 0.59 0.47 (SNITSCHEDULB ? ^ - - - - _ T - - - - - ? - - - - - V r ' - - ? p$3IGN HSAT k MBN) 0 83IGN SSLECTED tiiY'IT CPM CPM MINIMUM MAXIMUM COOL COOL NO. SL'PPLY OA IN/OUT ? INVOUT ION3 TONS AH-2 2000 ? 204 60 / 48 69!/ 55 ?14.87 5 ? , ? HEAT.TNG. AP.A ?OO,LIN,¢ .BLOGK :I'LOAA PROJSCT:'MANLLTI DBVSL6PMSNT DPPIC PRpJH4T N0- PILE 1QAMH: PMD3.LE6 ' DATB: 8-16-66 i i liNIT NO: AH-3 VENT AIR CFM: 272 : 1?TUMfl6R OF P8oBL8: IG FLOOR ARBA: 2099 I II CFM/SP7 0.95 LZGHTING W/3P: 1.88 DSSIGV CONDITIONS ! - ? - - - - - - - - _ _ ? .. - - - - - - - _ _ , - - - - - -_ _ ' _ _ - - - - - - - - v - _ _ _ - - - - - - ° - ^ SUMMSR OUTSTnE I ? INSIDB D2PPER$NCE * DAIffiY RANGE 22 DRYBULB 92 ? 74 18 * LATiTUDS 44 WETBUGB 75 ? 62 13 nS5IG1V TIME. 2 PK CvR/LB 104 64 40 WEA'THER STA. 7i 38 WIIrTER -19 ! 72 91 * MPL$./ST. PA UL, MN T ^ ` HEAT GOSS TOTAT,B HEAT GAYN TQTALS LATENT SBNSIBLE - ^ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ .. - - - _ - - - s _ _ .. - - - .. _ ... - - - - xUH TONSy TOIvS TRANSMI83YON 3146 TRANSMISS IQN - 2.42 INFII,TRATION 5543 INPSLTRAT ION 0.00 0.00 LIGHTS - 1.12 ? PEAPLi: 0.27 0.33 APPLIANCE S ' 0.00 0.00 ?MOTOR - 0.19 VBNTILATTON ? 6855 V$NTILATI ON 0.62 0.44 TOxAL ? 5545 TOTALS 0.88 4.52 ToTAL + 15% 8 6II77 TOTAL (S + Z) 5_40 CALC 3 SELECfiED AIR UISSRIBUTION - - _ - ' _ - pOR 2 PM _ - - i - - ' - - ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ 20NE CPM HTa - _ i CPM CLG CPM H&C C FM/SF HTG CFM/.SF CLC CPIr/SP H&C 1 128 186 ? 168 181 0.67 0?.61 0.65 2 130 157 i 182 177 1.01 i!.17 1.14 3 131 375 370 365 1.04 2i.03 1.01 4 129 53 42 51 0.47 tl!. 37 0_46 S 132 191 190 ? 186 1.10 1'.04 1.07 6 102 455 435 442 0.73 0.70 0.75 7 104 244 ? 251 244 0.82 6.85 0.82 g 101 336 359 349 3.43 _ _ 3.67 - - 3.57 L'NIT SCHEDULE - - - - - - - - - - - _ ^ _ ;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ .. _ -? - - - - - _ _ _ '` _ .. _ ^ _ _ _ - _ _ " _ _ - - - - I DBSIGN HBAT (MHH) dESIGN SELECTED liNIT CPM , CPM KTNTMUM +YAIKSMUM CODL COOL N0. SVPPL'Y ? OA IN/OUT IN/OCJT TONS TOfiS AX-3 2000 ' 272 ? 94 / 75 ' 208 J Sb !3_40 5 , . -. 2006 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION City OF Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Mn 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 Fax # 651-675-5694 Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifica[ions cut sheets on materials and comqonems lo be used Date Site Address: Tenant / Building Name: / The Applicant is: _ Owner ? Contractor Other PROPERTYOWNER C Address: / /qZ r7 lJI -?fe dzC/ ? City: G'R o State: Zip: ,l J` ?v?o2 ?.? n ,,? CONTRACTOR / ? le r'Ui?'C//0?141N License #: i Address: L/p?ino State: lA`' v Zip: 5?/ 35 Phonc #: 9502- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: FIRE PERMIT TYPE: ?C Sprinkler System (# of heads ) Fire Pump _ Standpipe Othcr: 114 WORK TYPE: ? New _ Addition _ Alterations _ Remodel Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: /-X Commercial _ Residential _ Educational Other: Please continue on reverse side PERMIT FEE: $50.50 Minnnum Fee (includes Sta[e Surcharge) ap Contract Value $ IoU. x .01 = $ ? ?? • ?? Permit Fee ? • If Permit Fee is $1,000 or less, add S.50 => $ 02 (?l • sU State Surcharge If Permit Fee is over $1,000, add $.50 per $1,000 Permit Fee 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $167.00 TOTAL FEE: $ I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformancc with thc ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that i undcrstand this is not a pcrmit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a revicw and approval of plans. /?ur (L? - </U ,lIG ?? • Applicant's Pria4 d Namc Applicant's i ture DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE REQUIRED INSPECT10N5 X\ Hydrostatic _ Flow Alarm _ Drain Test ? Rough In 7Y _ Trip _ Pump Test _ Central Station ? Final Conditions of Issuance: Permit Approved%qb___ C9. p?? o%,? Date: ????? A" Metropolitan Council Enuironmenta! Services June 2, 2005 Dale Schoeppner Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: r f? ? [ l VP I ? JIJN C, 3 200F ? By- The Metropolitan Council Environ,-nentai Serviczs Division has ueter.nined SAC for the Manley Development Office to be located at Lexington Way within the City of Eagan. 4/?d This project should be charged 2 SAC Units, as determined below. Charges: Office 5870 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft./SAC Unit Ifyou have any questions, call me at 651-602-1113. Sincerely, 7od . Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (300) 05060251 cc: www.metrocouncil.org S. 5elby, MCES Carolyn ICrech, Finance Department, Eagan SAC Units 2.45 or 2 Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Ffth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 •(651) 602-1005 • Fax 602-1138 • TTY 291-0904 . An Equa! Opportunity Emp(oyer May 13, 2005 Chris Engle CDPC 2113 Cliff Drive Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Office Building 4155 Lexington Way Dear Chris: We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a buildmg permit for the above-referenced project. This review is not mtended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2000 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the apphcable codes and we are, therefore, requesTmg that the items checked below be addressed: 1 set Architectural Plans 1 set Structural Plans 1 set Civil Plans 1 set Landscaping Plans 1 Code Analysis 1 Certificate of Survey ?I 1 Spea Insp. & Tesring Schedule Other: 1 Project Specs ?I 1 Energy Calcularions 1 Electric Power & Lighting Form 1 Master Exit Plan ? 1 Emergency Response Site Plan ?I 1 MGES SAC determination letter ?f 1 Soils Report If you have any questions regarding the above items, please feel free to contact me at 651-675- 5676. Sincerely, Mike Lence Senior Inspector ML1jeh 6126270805 AIA7TSONMACOONAL Matison Macdonafd Yaung structural englrteers Bassat Geak BucMeas Cenmr 901 Nwth 3rd Saw6 Sww I00 hfinrmpdk MN 55401 612-6Y7-7825 voke 612-917-OBOS Ra 09•4040 08•26•2005 :i: 1 f3 fax transmittal to: Jennifer Kaplan Mohagen Hansen Arddtectural Group (ssz) 473 - isao trom: Stephanie Young e-mail: stephanie@mattsonmacdonald.com date: Augusi 25, 2005 project- Lewngton way - Manley oevelopment Ofiice project #; 05468/03283 tc: pages. y, 3 meseage: Jenn'rfer- I lope this Is enough - mast af it I've already discussed with Dan. Stephanie ?? Ple:me Recyde ? 6128270805 . ..MATTSONMACDONAI?_="? -.? .. - ?-- Mattsan Macdonald Young structural engineers Ba.at Go.k 8.k? Ccnar 901 tiorth )rd SntieC Suite 100 MinrmapoK MN 55401 612-837J025 Voica 61 Y-07.0805 fm 09!40:48 08-25-2005 213 ta: Mohagen Nansen ArchEtectural Group Attn: denni{er KBplen 1415 E48t W9yzeta Boulevard Suite 200 Wayzeita, t+AN 55391 from: Stephanie Yaung e-ma1L• stephan"maHsonmaodonald.com dete: August 25, 2005 profecV. l.exiflgton Way- Manley DevefOpment praJect 03263/05468 pages: i . regarding: RFI # 1& RFl # 2 Jenniler- Here are the sUudural responses Go pFI # 1 g RFI i 2 RFI # 1 It b my underatending thet the top, G eoutae has now been plaeed, and it is aciually a 60 soGd 61ied bond beam course. 7he replxement anchars for the artchor bWLs and Ihe hpldown anchors et the interior shear waR Iocations are as foltows: Typical andror boHs - in IL-tt of the W anChor boks 9pecitied, 1ti° diameter thmaded rod stodt (A36) may he used. The rpds shalf have a minimum embedmeM of 6" imo the Caltxete iaopreg (not lncwUing tne S' top couise) anq shall be epoxy-bonded fn plaae. The 'HNtP HVA adhesive anchoring system (HAS rods) may also be used provided the same-6' embedment is achieved. Haldrnm anchor bolts - irt Geu af the 7/B° hptdpwn anchors spedfied, 718" diamefer 1hrEaded rod stook (A36) may be used. Tha rar,is shap ha++e a mlNmum embedment of 8' {nW the concrete footing (nat induding the e" top course) and shall be epoxy-bonded in ptaw. The Wllh' HVA adhesive encharin9 system (Hq$ rods) may alsa be used provided the samB 8" enbedmem is achieved. 61Z8£T0805 NA7TSONMACDONAL --- 08:11:00 08-$5-2005 9t3 leanglvn Way- RFI # 1 fi RR # 2 RFI#2 OSB and plywood are generally reoognized by the APA as simply'Yatsd panNs°. OS9 may be substituted for plywoad, provided the same panel ra6ng is mapltainCtl - in th(S ease, a rating Of Structural L Shauld a bwer rated panel besupplied, certain shear waA canstruction 1ype5 Rldy fIC+Ed t0 be mOdlflBd. FW lhis p815GUlat p(0(CCt, b83Cd 0n a sl8Yttl8ftl TdtBd" 102" OSB panal, the two IMerlor shear walls located towerd the west side ot tha eullding should be ehanged irom 7ype 1 shear walls to Type 2. 7he remamder a( the wails may be constructed as orlginally shown ort the corlstruCtiOn documents. Please cortact me if you have questions or require additlonal Informatlon. SIQII@d: 2?W"d?" {mamar+9sea} I , , 4 f Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use I644`, Permit#: / City of Eaau Permit Fee: 0 1/CZ,3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 RECEIVED Date Received: .94.6--)/'77 Phone:(651)675-5675 ' Fax:(651)6754694 FEB 212017 'l staff: �� ,\jj rel 2017 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION , � t.1 Date: February 20,2017 Site Address: 4120 Lexington Way,Eagan,MN 55123 Tenant Name: First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC) (Tenant is:_New/X Existing) Suite#: Former Tenant: Name: FFC Properties,LLC Phone: 651-452-1512 Property Owner Address/City/Zip: 4120 Lexington Way,Eagan,MN 55123 Applicant is: Owner X Contractor Type of Work Description of work: Office and storage addition Construction Cost: $960,000.00 Name: Jaeger Construction,LLC License#: IR651740 Address: 2317 Waters Drive City: Mendota Heights Contractor c'�/ _ State: MN Zip: 55120 Phone: f'64-3.89-23-3112'- 7e / Contact: Barry Jaeger Email: barry@jaegerllc.com Name: Mohagen Hansen Architecture Registration#: 18074 Architect/Engineer Address: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr.#200 City: Wayzata State: MN Zip: 55391 Phone: 952-426-7400 Contact Person: Jennifer Kaplan Email: jkaplan@mohagenhansen.com Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone#: NOTE:Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information maybe classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www,aooherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan;that I understand this is not a permit,but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Barry E.Jaeger x ' ' 4W Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's - ;nature Page 1 of 3 117-0 7 Hic)(a DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES Foundation _ Public Facility _ Exterior Alteration-Apartments X Commercial I Industrial _ Accessory Building _ Exterior Alteration-Commercial Apartments _ Greenhouse/Tent _ Exterior Alteration-Public Facility Miscellaneous Antennae WORK TYPES _ New _ Interior Improvement _ Siding Demolish Building* — X Addition _ Exterior Improvement _ Reroof __ Demolish Interior _ Alteration Repair _ Windows __ Demolish Foundation Replace _ Water Damage T Fire Repair _ Retaining Wall Salon Owner Change *Demolition of entire building-give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION Valuation Occupancy /yB/S-t MCES System YGS '/ Plan Review i. Code Edition Zo NO /S GG Z.SAC Units p r salter (25% _100%J Zoning City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump #of Units Square Feet 5 Z O G PRV #of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers ✓ Type of Construction zig Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings(New Building) "s< Final I C.O.Required Footings(Deck) Final I No C.O.Required Footings(Addition) Other: X Foundation X Foundation Before Backfill Pool: Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final Drain Tile 7( Siding:_._Stucco Lath Stone Lath _Brick_EFIS X Roof:_Decking Insulation _Ice&Water X Final Retaining Wall Framing_30 Minutes X 1 Hour Erosion Control Fireplace:_Rough In Air Test _Final Concrete Entrance Apron X Insulation Meter Size: Sheetrock x Electronic Plans Required Windows Final C/O Inspection:Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Yes No Reviewed By: , Planning New Business to Eagan: Reviewed By: , Building Inspector FEES Water Quality Base Fee Sj SC?S Storm Sewer Trunk Surcharge y8o.:mg.Sewer Trunk Plan Review # 3/7,/I. 8 Water Trunk -- MCES SAC V ?II/I) Street Lateral I City SAC 0 ZZO. — Street — S&W Permit&Surcharge Water Lateral — Treatment Plant '4 1753 Ga r�+ Other: 54o �. j+e( Ptc4ocx..+c ��0 a O Treatment Plant(Irrigation) — La.a s lesr 5.044.-(1 Ly 0 7 op D -0, Park Dedication 2r, , Trail Dedication TOTAL: 30/--)S2 Page 2 of 3 MCES USE: Letter Reference: 170310A3 Address ID:674726 Payment ID:400207 1 LUa Date of Determination: 03/10/17 Determination Expiration:03/10/19 Greetings! Please see the determination below. Project Name: First Fiduciary Corporation Project Address: 4120 Lexington Way Suite#/Campus: N/A City Name: Eagan Applicant: Barry Jaeger,Jaeger Construction Special Notes: The Council understands this building has speculative office. At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use,the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. Charge Calculation: Office: 3363 sq.ft. @ 2400 sq.ft./SAC= 1.40 Office—Speculative: 1697 sq.ft. @ 2400 sq.ft./SAC=0.71 Meeting: 1578 sq.ft. @ 1650 sq.ft./SAC=0.96 Showers: 1 shower(s) @ 1 shower/SAC= 1.00 Total Charge: 4.07 Credit Calculation: Manley Development(SAC 07/05) = 2.45 Total Credit: 2.45 Net SAC: 1.62 —or— 2 SAC Due The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions email me at: karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Thank you, Karon Cappaert Administrative Specialist Please visit our SAC website by going to: http://www.metrocouncil.org/SACprogram 390 Robert Street North I St. Paul. MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 I Fax 651.602.1550 I TTY 651.291.0904 I metrocouncil.org METROPOLITAN An C O U N C I L Fq,-i�/Opportunity Employer 4 . >- ,_ 8 ,`' 0 • _, `-8E"E 1 - t.n!2 LLi a r•J o a o TA i t H x,..,.! 5ggp. i . ! 2 8 < At qgP q!.:Ii i 5 0 x w -,f LAq kv,g2 a . 2 a R 0 0 Tc z „.. - :i z g 0 ----.1 HM P MIN, I i 1 4 ,-- ,r urn <u.. d=11111111.1M 8 i q 6 R E 1 5' 11 li ii g > 2 8 2 8 2 8 §E i 8 iP i! i! . ',.4! - -E - '. ,;. ' 1g - ; ; ! ht• .° g ° ,1' 1 ,- . ,f 2 ,s ,v 2 22 1.t 1. 1.! ; 1 ! p, ! p 3 ; ! ; ; 4 4 '34 ,Ri z S ,.' S k.,s PT. 0, SS gi .. SS g P qg,n1 6 Hinilli 2 iOliHilliinlifflhin LI - • . i 6, m"21:"9 4' ,d 000000000®00®®0®® ®(D®C)0 E ! V t 1 'l.-rpm' , . 4., • Ill .... .) .,, o =."--ifilu ..... iiirai_."2z im ...._ „ . _.... z , , I _. Cf- 4D 0 0 1_ 1CO 1 t e 0 01 09 1111 t,lk 4D G 0 1 e II -II rungitimp.:46) —,. MIMI CO t s 1 . d. 0 be r71.7, 10. , o 0 1 K [3 1111111 1 3 moor_ ''61 4 ,., _.... ._. miz. w -, , _ . ii.- 1 r i r I .7 ,ro -I , .- •E fl, 1L_ I • E.F. 1: — :, T lel 4$1-1...q, -=Ys A •,.. C ' 0,1 p! . .. , 01 , z , 1 0 0 0 0 0 = 8 JE .. 1 E.1 r v,11. 17'9 ..,. w, 1 - Til 1 a 4 .,„ 0 / 111> Use BLUE or BLACK Ink ,- For Office Use 'C-.. 4*6Permit#: /(/2/ City of Eagan �� 00 3830 Pilot Knob Road Permit Fee: Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651)675-5675 Date Received: Fax: (651)675-5694 Staff: i 2017 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY Date: /.-_ (7 -1-7 �FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: r c._ pro F,c_,--� c._.? — PRV required 1"-b/ Zt L _City R-O-W Permit Address: �; ,v 142 Phone Number: i /4.7...... ,../.,-,.r)�,,��1 _. County R-O-W Permit Plumber: l`'fc'iro Vti r/41c,, . .vsc Contact Name: 76 Y - L33-3656 K plumbing Permit 1 SEWER WATER Sewer Service ��-.w., ---- . a..'.Wa ,w Service - iv i Sewer lateral charge Water la - -I charge Sewer trunk (3-1'� — � Water trunk City SAC @$110/unit i>.,\~� A < Water supply stora.- MCES SAC @$2,485/unit • Receipt#: D. Receipt#. , Date: i Treatment Plant @$:' .:0/u , Permit Fee, including State Surcharge $65.00 1 Permit Fee • uding State Surchar.: $65.00 TOTAL: .mg Permit Required s� � '" Re uired-water meter to be i acquired with building permit TOTAL: .. _., _ _ -„� _ _ SEWER &WATER _,� . ISewer Service 1 Water Service Sewer lateral charge 1 ater lateral charge Sewe nk Water trunk City SAC MCES SA eceipt# , Date Water supply&storage Receipt# , Date Treatment plant R Permit Fee, including State Surcharge $129.00 `Plumbing Permit Required-water meter to be 1 acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.orq Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Us City* Permit#: ?_ Q IJPIP'‘', d ' *<.',�°• k Permit Fee: - j�- O 0 3830 Pilot Knob Road i -- `' . � Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: "-7/ —/I3-, 7 Phone: (651)675-5675 APR 1 3 2017 Fax: (651)675-5694 Staff: .V----_. 2017 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION Ed Please submit two(2)sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: 613 16, /7 Site Address: 4//z6) -zE-e� v6-7-o'A ) (J/ Tenant: / f---C—t-- --%(..j Gi.( ( ,�-�. C t C3 Suite#: ' /, lr6 / o �, 7/ES L t,0 r Name: Phone: Name:.Z-4i2 �- 2),e3 r 5-vpe./2,/ /1- At(6',9J/a6cense#: ///_ C3/23 Address: 2 , e, '-n/ C/ /f��City: ��/d ES�E/< State: ob�Zip: S70/' Phone: Sd 7_2 — O� Gf Email /1Tc/FP /2��r��l/4'�di2 C�/�/✓/c z. . r/.S , New Replacement —Repair —Rebuild _Modify Space Work in R.O.W. Type ofWork' — — • n Description of work: /X O /�T/ �X.�i9.''✓s/d✓ , -o, - COMMERCIAL Y New Construction Modify Spaceace R ',,F7-77,',,,- Irrigation System(_yes/Z no)(_RPZ/_PVB) s • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Pert, y • Avg.GPM (2"turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call(651)675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic:Size&Type Fire: 1 / Avg.GPM High demand devices?_Yes_No Flushometers_Yes_No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value$ 3O,0 00-cox.01 $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum eD $60.00 PVB/RPZ Permit(includes State Surcharge) _$ ®� Permit Fee c� C) C =$ (7 y Surcharge Surcharge=Contract Value x$0.0005 3' � o 4, If the project valuation is over$1 million, please call for Surcharge =$ r TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department,(651)675-5646,for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply&Storage $ State Surcharge =$ TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. \ hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. �/ x /i9"(JJY /�/91) /2 x ��/ Applicant's Printed Name Applicants Signature }FFIjr. Approved By: ► . i '. . pec ons:fKut.der'Grround )- 'cough "<Y Air T ,„_Gas Test j Final %iPRV/i ffi es No//' . \\� ... i�yj/' 7' ..,• ��,�y/ r % /� Meter Related Iteai7rlis Meter Size ,7-;dio Read �� Manometer - •y o\ taff , ///�/..., Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use City of Lia an t 4 t "0 Permit#: /(74230C,? r p. 3830 Pilot Knob Road lc(6 1� Permit Fee: Eagan MN 55122 rt_tit` APR 1 3 Z017 Date Received: II'13' 7 Phone: (651)675-5675 Fax: (651)675-5694 \7 Staff: J 2017 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two(2)sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: 3_2 0`/7 Site Address: q/2 0 L GX/✓"JG 7041 2 ' Tenant: I-A-- /42O/ T / - ZXO"/711/704} Suite#: f� Name: / /)a4 T/ Z ( - Phone: Resldent/Owler Address/Cit /Zip �/2 Z ")</v(16.722,41, 4-)4Y �BO D Gc g 1 Vii , L61-- Name: . r.1le /2-/©/2-- /7�6G./-)/9✓,//e,4Zi License#: /2�/ 1' CO7- Contraet� y,,, Address: /f,l City: OG�K�T�12 State: YV Zip: 5. / / Phone: Contact: g4,4/27' vPPe/A Email: /%�i�/°en&,r- RiOi✓' c j3/'h,c/)e,a ,, \ x New Replacement 1' Additional Alteration Demolition Description of work: / ô/ 7-I .5'. X/24/ /S/OA) %4% ' / ii:76:Roof meieititY:4,'41 � ode. Please e MeaiiiikaftiiiPator.fortyt 0e on on permt .- g Sc ne o s ,,,,,. , L� :: .:._ ;•.::. . RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL r€ Furnace X New Construction Interior Improvement FT /o _Air Conditioner X Install Piping Processed \\ YPa j, \. _Air Exchanger Gas Exterior HVAC Unit , \ / Heat Pump _Under/Above ground Tank ( Install/ Remove) r '%' ijI Other RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit, includes State Surcharge $100.00 Residential New, includes State Surcharge =$ . _ / TOTAL FEE COMMERCIAL FEES ,--,,,, 00 Contract Value$ 4V /6(,—, .01 $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum Ofd $75.00 Underground tank installation/removal, includes State Surcharge =$ `� Z �' Permit Fee 2/ e'2 .$ Surcharge Surcharge=Contract Value x$0.0005 If the project valuation is over$1 million, please call for Surcharge =$ Z7/(1/1 TOTAL FEE I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan;that I understand this is not a permit,but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x N/ Applicants Printed Name Applicants Signature FOR OFFICE USE y ' . Required Inspectio % -�v\ Reviewed By y%Date ...- U derg un Rough In Air Test -ffi� ervlce Test. I floor;,Heat. , � �„ *� s ' Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 417/11 For Office Use PerCity ofEaaau 1.� Permit Fee: a�`�, l 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 // Phone: (651)675-5675 r� �, Date Received: (D '�/ Fax: (651)675-5694 k� 1 i Staff: J 2017 FIRE SUPPRESSION`� SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 6 -i — f 7 Site Address: i,?v � �".) 372 3 Tenant: ,,e- Suite#: r Name: Phone: Property Owner Address/City/Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor /� Type of Work Description of work:G � � �,c. .v-7 .JArq 40,)6 Construction Cost: Estimated Completion Date: Name: I /� j �� i / � License#: C/2-0 Contractor Address: 75- � ,cN77 , 8 City: �1r �/¢' State: keit Zip: X17 Phone: 651 f r (O Contact: i),1 6.4a-dA' Email: 0 4/} fr' r'cG0400fige.6 ,L©A4 FIRE PERMIT TYPE WORK TYPE 194Sprinkler System (#of heads ) _New Addition • Fire Pump _Standpipe _Alterations _Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial _Residential _Educational FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum Contract Value$ gli I/'O. 00 x.01 Surcharge=Contract Value x$0.0005 =$ 214, co Permit Fee If the project valuation is over$1 million, please call for Surcharge3 _$ �' Surcharge $100.00 Residential New(includes State Surcharge) =$ '.4 TOTAL FEE 3/4" Fire Meter-$290.00 =$ 1551,4 Fire Meter =$ #227, 43 TOTAL FEE ""Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications,cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes;that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x E/At.)� xdeze. -edr, _' Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signatur-A FOR OFFICE USE i/( 3 REQUIIRE/D"I'E USE ETIO{ S i IR Hydrostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test t✓Rett gh In Trip pump Test Central Station incl of Issuance: Conditions Permit Reviewed by: IIIIIZi.4_. Date: t J'; . A Special Inspection Final Report First Fiduciary Corporation Addition 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 BRAUNBraun Intertec Corporation INTERTEC The Science You Build On. BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:651.487.3245 1826 Buerkle Road Fax: 651.487.1812 INTERTEC Saint Paul,MN 55110 Web: braunintertec.com The Science You Build On. August 31,2017 Project B1702535 Mr. Daniel Lodahl FFC Properties, LLC 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, MN 55123 Re: A Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal First Fiduciary Corporation Addition 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Lodahl: This report details the procedures used in our evaluation and the conclusions related to the special inspection requirements detailed in the Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Agreement for the First Fiduciary Corporation building addition.Also included are the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures Special inspection services were provided by geotechnical engineers(for soils-related issues), International Code Council(ICC)certified special inspectors,and/or experienced technicians in accordance with our contract and the project documents which include referenced State Building Code, including adopted portions of Chapter 17 International Building Code(IBC),the project special inspection schedule and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the design professionals or the code official as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the State Building Code to determine compliance with the approved construction documents.The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to,nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify construction documents.Only the engineer-of-record or the architect-of- record can do so. AA/EOE FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 2 As the special inspections were completed,a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of the inspections and testing. Daily reports were distributed periodically as they were prepared.As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents are noted. Project Documents The project documents that were provided to us were used as the basis of our inspections.When we received approved plan modifications,the modifications were also used to evaluate work completed. Cast-in-Place Concrete Construction Concrete Reinforcement We reviewed the reinforcement requirements on the project structural drawings.We reviewed steel grade,size, length,spacing,location,and splice lengths to evaluate if in-place reinforcement was placed in accordance with the requirements of project plans and specifications.We also noted if in-place reinforcement was free of excessive rust and soil. In addition to observing concrete reinforcement,we reviewed other structural anchors cast into the concrete.We noted that shape and dimensions of the concrete formwork was as noted in the plans and specifications. Concrete Placement Observations The special inspector reviewed the mix designation shown on the concrete delivery ticket to document the specified concrete was being placed for the element being placed and that the mix was placed within the specified time limits. During placement of concrete,the inspector also noted any displacement of the reinforcement or other items within the member being placed. If found,the contractor was advised to reposition the items to their original locations. Observations were performed to monitor the procedures used by the contractor to place and consolidate concrete were consistent with requirements of the plans and specifications and typical industry standards. Concrete Testing The special inspector performed testing to measure the plastic concrete's slump,temperature,and air content during each placement based on the project documents. In addition,concrete cylinders were cast to evaluate the concrete's compressive strength. BRAUN INTERTEC FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 3 Concrete cylinders were temporarily stored at the site,then transported to our laboratory for curing and compressive strength testing. Results of the concrete compressive strength testing were distributed as they became available to parties who requested them. Cast-in-Place Concrete Construction Conclusions Reinforcement placement detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the requirements of project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved reinforcing steel-related issues. Concrete was placed and cured in a manner consistent with the project documents and industry standards. Required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed and found acceptable. Compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed meets project requirements.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved cast-in-place concrete construction-related issues. Structural Masonry Construction Masonry Construction Observations Our observations included evaluating the size and location of structural elements in addition to the type, size,and location of anchors and other details of anchorage of masonry to structural members,frames, or other construction for compliance.We also evaluated whether the specified size,grade,and type of reinforcement was used and conditions of masonry were in compliance with the guidelines of the IBC. Prior to grouting,the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors,and construction of mortar joints were observed. Placement and consolidation of the grout was observed for conformance with the requirement of the specifications. Masonry Testing Hollow core masonry prisms were observed while being cast by the contractor and tested in general accordance with ASTM C 1314.Samples were temporarily stored at the site and transported to our laboratory for curing and compressive strength testing. Compressive strength results were distributed as they became available to parties who requested them. BRAUN INTERTEC FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 4 Structural Masonry Conclusions Required structural masonry observations and testing detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports have been completed in general accordance with the requirements of the project documents. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural masonry-related issues. Soils Basis for Soils Observations A geotechnical evaluation was performed for this project by Northern Technologies.This report is dated September 29,2016. In this evaluation,soil borings were performed to evaluate the subgrade conditions. The following is an excerpt from our Special Inspection Daily Report dated March 27, 2017: Work Completed Desergrtion: Around 1615 an received a cal from kite Ter with Jaeger Construction Ile requested a site from us to observe test pits for the proposed building addition_Scheduled a site visitor t:30 pm Meed as requested at pinPresent on-site were Mike Tic. and various others from Jaeger Construction and Turner Excav cow of a Geotechniod Exploration and&Iterating Review prepared bNTI(ZiffReport)and dated September .261n.Arrived on-site with Civil and Structural plans dated and 16 1211t6, .Observed the M. of Test Pit TP-t performed near Grids E_5U(at the northwest addition comer).Test Pit TP-1 was terrnihacid at a depth of about 31/2 feet below subgrade eleratian(potion-#-tooling for the existing bidding).Materials encountered were consistent with those deserted in the Nil Report.Soon after TP-I was excavated'.Barry Jaeger of Construction arrived on site.The results of the sot borings and thegeotechnical recommendations presented i n the were discussed.It was decided to excavate a second test pit just south southeast addition comer near Grids A-4.Test Pit -2 was excavated to a depth of about 91/2 feet below FFE.which was about 71x2 feet below existiig surface grade at that Wotan.Based or the results of the test pis.we offered theretaining recommendations to provide adequate support metre foundations and slab. --Foundation Strip and Ccitenn Footings-- Stecut drip' footings a depth equivalent to twice the width of the sip footings and subcut column loonies a depth equivalent to the width of the column pads.For both cases,athereavation depths will be about 4 feet.Backfill the 'e�aition with 200 psi tfitowable _ Construct the footings per plan upon the erred lovable fit t ith this some existing fi via be left in place below the lovable fill,there is a risk associated with darn so.Since the backfii material win consist of fir in our opinion.the width of the excavation does not need to be wider than the width of the footing. NOTE:Thisas re mended specifically for the east footing fire.Grids A to E 3.9 and 4.but this approach could be *plied to of a e+hrgs. --Conventional Soil Correction— Elsewhere.away from the east wait consideration could been to a conventional sat correction;removing all of the unsuitable soils from below the bung area and replacing it with fill. —Slab — We recommend that the upper 2 feet of the slab subgrade consist of engineered fdl. After these emendations were discussed with Mr_Jaeger.it was reported to us that he would discuss the foioving approach with the design learn and owner:(1)implement towable-fi alternative for all foundations and(2)provide at least 2 feet of high-quality engineered sand NI below the slab_ With regard to the areas where proposed footings connect the existing buibding,we further recommended that about 2-fbuidingaeet away t from aider face of the existing footing and that wbexcavations are tapaered down and away tan the existing BRAUN INTERTEC FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 5 As discussed in our March 27, 2017,Special Inspection Daily Report, NTI originally recommended removing existing fill from below the building. However, it must be noted that NTI's recommendations were based on the original building design which included a basement.The design documents were later revised to remove the basement,but added a second story.To the best of our knowledge, NTI was not informed of this design change,thus no commentary from NTI was ever received. While on-site on March 27,2017,our geotechnical engineer evaluated subsurface soil conditions through test pits and hand auger probes advanced into subsurface soils exposed at the bottom of the test pits. The materials observed were generally consistent with those described in the NTI report.Based on our observations and engineering judgement,we provided the supplemental recommendations discussed in our March 27,2017,Special Inspection Daily Report. In summary,we recommend subexcavating the existing fill to a depth of about 4 feet below the footings and backfilling the exhumed material with Controlled Low Strength Material,or flowable fill.We observed the subexcavations and placement of the flowable fill on March 30, 2017,and April 28,2017. Soil Testing Procedures Soils exposed in the bottom of the excavations were visually evaluated,while those at depth were evaluated using hand auger borings.These were performed to determine if the observed and tested soils were consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical evaluation. Hand auger borings were drilled with a 1 1/2-inch-diameter hand auger,and were advanced in 2-to 4-inch increments to depths of 2 to 4 feet below the bottom of the excavation.The auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings.Soils encountered in the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils(Visual/Manual Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance to penetration of the hand auger and the turning resistance. After review of the subgrade,additional fill was placed to achieve design elevations of bottom of slabs.We tested compaction of the fill by the Nuclear Moisture Density Method(ASTM D 6938)which determines in place density,to evaluate soil compaction by comparing to the results obtained in laboratory Proctor test results.The test results were distributed under separate cover as they became available.In addition to evaluating relative density and moisture content of the fill,we also observed that the soil classification of the fill was consistent with the our supplemental recommendations presented in our March 27,2017, Special Inspection Daily Report. BRAUN I NTERTEC FFC Properties, LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 6 Soils Conclusions The required testing in the field and laboratory have been completed.Observations and testing of the excavation bottoms indicated that the exposed soils were consistent with those encountered by the geotechnical evaluation performed for this project. Based on our observations, it appeared that the soil improvements were performed in general accordance with our March 27,2017,supplemental recommendations. From our evaluation,it is our opinion that the foundation subgrades are capable of supporting a net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,000 pounds per square foot,and meet performance expectations stated in the geotechnical evaluation.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved soils-related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted,the testing performed,the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports and the reports referenced herein,it is our professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications,and applicable workmanship provisions of the State Building Code and the International Building Code. BRAUN INTERTEC FFC Properties,LLC Project B1702535 August 31,2017 Page 7 General Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project.After review of this Special Inspection Final Report,if you have any questions or require additional information,please contact Joel Kurpius at 651.487.7006 or jkurpius@braunintertec.com. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Inspecting Firm:Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. `,`,Oso K,24 0, 11/4/4‘ereA iletA jtieta:A4 =S memo PROFI Joel C.Kurpius,PE ENGMER x Project Engineerto). 43523 License Number:43523 August 31,2017C OF'N►,o,r��'� Steven B.Martin,PE Associate Principal/Senior Engineer Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 7 c: Dale Schoeppner,City of Eagan Todd Mohagen,Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group Barry Jaeger,Jaeger Construction,LLC Paul Voigt,Voigt and Associates,Inc. BRAUN INTERTEC BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC Me Seism,Yott Build On. 1826 Buerkle Road Client: Project: Saint Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-487-3245 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 2317 Waters Dr First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Mendota Heights,MN 55120 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 03/27/2017 City of: Eagan Report Number: 1 Technician: Kurpius,Joel Braun Intertec PM:Joel Kurpius Weather: Mostly Sunny,Light Breeze 60 Coverage Frequency Notes Soils Periodic Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: Around 10:15 am,received a call from Mike Tix with Jaeger Construction. He requested a site from us to observe test pits for the proposed building addition.Scheduled a site visit for 1:30 pm.Arrived on-site as requested at 1:30 pm. Present on-site were Mike Tix, and various others from Jaeger Construction and Turner Excavating. Provided a copy of a Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review prepared by NTI(NTI Report)and dated September 29,2016.Arrived on-site with Civil and Structural plans dated 8/29/16 and 12/9/16,respectively.Observed the excavation of Test Pit TP-1 performed near Grids E.5-0(at the northwest addition corner).Test Pit TP-1 was terminated at a depth of about 3 1/2 feet below subgrade elevation(bottom-of-footing for the existing building).Materials encountered were consistent with those described in the NTI Report.Soon after TP-1 was excavated, Barry Jaeger of Jaeger Construction arrived on site.The results of the soil borings and the geotechnical recommendations presented in the NTI Report were discussed. It was decided to excavate a second test pit just south of the southeast addition corner near Grids A-4.Test Pit TP-2 was excavated to a depth of about 9 1/2 feet below FFE,which was about 7 1/2 feet below existing surface grade at that location. Based on the results of the test pits,we offered the following recommendations to provide adequate support for the foundations and slab. Foundation Strip and Column Footings Subcut strip footings a depth equivalent to twice the width of the strip footings and subcut column footings a depth equivalent to the width of the column pads. For both cases,subexcavation depths will be about 4 feet.Backfill the excavation with 200 psi flowable fill. Construct the footings per plan upon the cured flowable fill.With this recommendation,some existing fill will be left in place below the flowable fill;there is a risk associated with doing so.Since the backfill material will consist of flowable fill, in our opinion,the width of the excavation does not need to be wider than the width of the footing. NOTE:This approach was recommended specifically for the east footing line,Grids A to E, 3.9 and 4, but this approach could be applied to all the footings. Conventional Soil Correction Elsewhere,away from the east wall,consideration could be given to a conventional soil correction; removing all of the unsuitable soils from below the building area and replacing it with engineered fill. Slab Support---- We recommend that the upper 2 feet of the slab subgrade consist of engineered fill. After these recommendations were discussed with Mr.Jaeger, it was reported to us that he would discuss the following approach with the design team and owner: (1)implement flowable-fill alternative for all foundations and(2)provide at least 2 feet of high-quality engineered sand fill below the slab. With regard to the areas where proposed footings connect the existing building,we further recommended that subexcavations begin about 2 feet away from the outer face of the existing footing and that subexcavations are tapaered down and away from the existing building at a slope of 1:1 (H:V). Tests Performed: Hand Auger Probes,where appropriate. Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?:Yes Page 1 of 2 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The Memos You Build On. 1826 Buerkle Road Client: Project: Saint Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-487-3245 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 2317 Waters Dr First Fiduciary Corporation(FEC)Addition Mendota Heights,MN 55120 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. 11‘.4.424,;4_, Page 2 of 2 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The Science Tau Build On. 1826 Buerkle Road Client: Project: Saint Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-487-3245 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 03/29/2017 City of: Eagan Report Number:2 Technician: Kurpius,Joel Braun Intertec PM: Joel Kurpius Weather: overcast,breezy 50 Coverage Frequency Notes Soils Periodic Observed placement of CLSM("flowable fill")below perimeter foundation. Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: Observed placement of CLSM("flowable fill')below perimeter foundation,Grids E-3.9 to A-4,and A-4 to A-2.5.Depth of subexcavation appeared to be in accordance with our recommendations provided in our Special Inspection Report dated March 27,2017,and the materials encountered appeared to be consistent those described in the NTI geotechnical report. Tests Performed: N/A Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?: No To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. )04‘..4.42,:<„se, Page 1 of 1 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The Science You Build On. 1826 Buerkle Road Client: Project: Saint Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-487-3245 FFC Properties,LLC 61702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 03/30/2017 City of: Eagan Report Number: 3 Technician: Kurpius,Joel Braun Intertec PM:Joel Kurpius Weather: overcast,breezy 46 Coverage Frequency Notes Soils Periodic Observed placement of CLSM("flowable fill")below perimeter foundation. Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: Observed placement of CLSM("flowable fill")below perimeter foundation,Grids A.2.5 to A-1 and A-1 to E-0.5. Depth of subexcavation appeared to be in accordance with our recommendations provided in our Special Inspection Report dated March 27,2017,and the materials encountered appeared to be consistent those described in the NTI geotechnical report. Tests Performed: N/A Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?: No To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Page 1 of 1 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The Memo.You Bui dOa. 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Client: Project: Minneapolis,MN 55438 Phone:952-995-2000 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 04/1 8/201 7 City of: Eagan MN Report Number:4 Technician:Zander,Paul Braun Intertec PM: Joel Kurpius Weather: Rain 50 Coverage Frequency Notes Concrete Construction Periodic Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: The rebar and forms were observed and concrete was placed for the strip footings at grids A to E-1,A-1 to 4 and A to E-4.The rebar and forms were placed in general accordance with the plans. Tests Performed: One slump and air test and one set of five concrete cylinders were cast for compressive strength testing. Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?:Yes To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. "Rw,-.19 Page 1 of 1 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The Science Tau BuiidOn. 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Client: Project: Minneapolis,MN 55438 Phone:952-995-2000 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 04/21/2017 City of: Eagan MN Report Number: 5 Technician:Zander, Paul Braun Intertec PM:Joel Kurpius Weather: Sunny 50 Coverage Frequency Notes Masonry Construction Periodic Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: The reinforcing was observed and grout was placed for the below grade 8 inch block at grids A to E-1 to 4 courses 1 to 4.The reinforcing was placed in general accordance with the structural plans. Tests Performed: One slump test and one set of three grout prisms were cast along with one set of three 8 inch block prisms and net area block for lab testing. Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?: Yes To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. PC-tr--67 Page 1 of 1 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC T.ScienceYouHoitdOn. 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Client: Project: Minneapolis,MN 55438 Phone:952-995-2000 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 05/05/2017 City of: Eagan,MN Report Number:6 Technician: Schulzetenberg,Aaron Braun Intertec PM:Joel Kurpius Weather: Sunny 75 Coverage Frequency Notes Concrete Construction Continuous Observed reinforcement and concrete placement Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: Observed reinforcement and concrete placement for the following elements: Interior Column Pads,Grids A.2-3,A.9-3,D.9-2.1 Interior Strip Footing,Grids A.9 to E along Grid 3 Trash Enclosure Exterior Footing Concrete Pier at Grid G-0.1 Tests Performed: Concrete Testing, Cast Concrete Cylinder Set#2 Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?:Yes To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Schulzetenberg, Aaron Page 1 of 1 BRAUN Special Inspection Daily Report INTERTEC The ee401101 You eWld On. 1826 Buerkle Road Client: Project: Saint Paul,MN 55110 Phone:651-487-3245 FFC Properties,LLC B1702535 4120 Lexington Way First Fiduciary Corporation(FFC)Addition Eagan,MN 55123 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Activity Date: 04/28/2017 City of: Eagan Report Number: 7 Technician: Kurpius,Joel Braun Intertec PM:Joel Kurpius Weather: overcast,slight breeze 80 Coverage Frequency Notes Soils Periodic Interior Footing Subgrade Architect/engineer authorized changes to approved plans?: No Work Completed Description: Observed placement of CLSM plowable fill")below interior foundation,Grids D.8 to E -1 to 3 and D.8 to A.7-3.Depth of subexcavation appeared to be in accordance with our recommendations provided in our Special Inspection Report dated March 27, 2017,and the materials encountered appeared to be consistent those described in the NTI geotechnical report. Tests Performed: N/A Outstanding discrepancies on this project?: No Report discussed with and sent to contractor?: Yes To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Page 1 of 1 1 l CITY COPY 61010LOGIII.LLC GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion 4120 Lexington Way Eagan Minnesota NTI Project No. 16.61673.100 Prepared For: FFC Properties, LLC 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, Minnesota 55123 , r , tez 6160 Carmen Avenue East Inver Grove Heights,MN 55076 P:651.389.4191 F:651.389.4190 Unearthing confidenceTM ss,uC www.NTIgeo.com September 29,2016 FFC Properties, LLC 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Attn: Mr. Don Lodahl Subject:Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan, Minnesota NTI Project No. 16.61673.100 Dear Mr. Lodahl, In accordance to your request and subsequent authorization,Northern Technologies,LLC(NTI) conducted a Geotechnical Exploration for the above referenced project. Our services included advancement of exploration borings and preparation of an engineering report with recommendations developed from our geotechnical services.Our work was performed in general accordance with our proposal dated August 29,2016. Soil samples obtained at the site will be held for 60 days at which time they will be discarded. Please advise us in writing if you wish to have us retain them for a longer period. You will be assessed an additional fee if soil samples are retained beyond 60 days. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project. If there are any questions regarding the soils explored or our review and recommendations,please contact us at your convenience at(763)433-9175. Northern Technologies, LLC APO- Debra A.Schroeder, P.E. Senior Engineer Ryan M. Benson,P.E. Regional Manager/Principal Engineer Precision Expertise Geotechnical l Materials FR RGO BISMARCK GRAN FORKS; MINOI1I iNVER GROVE HEIGHTS' R,4M SE`'( sFirst Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion !1 Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Site/Project Description 2 2.2 Scope of Services 2 3.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS 3 3.1 Exploration Scope 3 3.2 Subsurface Conditions 3 3.3 Groundwater Conditions 4 3.4 Laboratory Test Program 4 4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4.1 Project Scope 4 4.2 Site Preparation 5 4.3 Shallow Foundations 7 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Settlement 7 4.5 Subsurface Drainage 8 4.6 Utilities 8 4.7 Slab-on-Grade Floors 9 4.8 Exterior Wall Backfill 10 4.9 Surface Drainage 11 4.10 Pavement Construction 12 4.11 Stormwater Infiltration 13 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 14 5.1 Frost Considerations 14 5.2 Excavation Stability 14 5.3 Engineered Fill&Winter Construction 15 6.0 CLOSURE 15 r"./ � GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW First Fiduciary Corporation Building Addition NTI Project No. 16.61673.100 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We briefly summarize below our geotechnical recommendations for the proposed project.The summary must be read in complete context with our report. • We conclude you may support the proposed building addition upon standard perimeter strip and spread column footings on competent,non-organic natural soil(s)or engineered fill,as recommended within our report. • Building addition linear strip footings and interior column footings(if required) may be proportioned using the maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures of 3,500 pounds per square foot. • Measurable groundwater was encountered at the time of the field exploration in two of the eight borings completed. Groundwater in Boring SB-2 was encountered at approximately 4.5 feet below existing grade or an elevation of 981.1 feet. Based upon the results of the remainder of the field exploration in NTI's opinion this was a perched water condition. Boring SB-7 encountered groundwater at approximately 19.5 feet below existing grade or at an elevation of 964.8 feet. This is likely in closer relation to the static water table onsite. The installation of temporary piezometers monitored over an extended period of time would be required for a more definitive determination of the static water table onsite. • The onsite clay laden soils can be relatively slow draining and are conducive to the development of zones of perched water at varying elevations and locations across the project site. • Overall,the site soils are conducive to movement of groundwater both laterally and vertically over time. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce groundwater entry of project excavations. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices attachments concerning groundwater issues and subsurface drainage. Page 1 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion t � Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Site/Project Description The proposed First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion project is to be constructed as defined within Table 1. Table 1:Project&Site Description Item Description Building Type One to two stories above grade with one level of below grade basement construction. Floor Elevations First floor assumed to be at an elevation of 986.2 feet to match the existing floor slab. NTI assumes the lower floor basement level at an elevation of approximately 976 feet. Proposed Maximum Change in Site Elevation NTI assumes that site grades will remain within approximately 3 feet as compared to the grades encountered during the site exploration. Site Description Location of Project 4120 Lexington Way in Eagan,Minnesota Existing Land Use/Improvements to Parcel The site is currently occupied by the FFC building surrounded by bituminous drive lanes/parking stalls and maintained landscaping. Current Ground Cover Pavement or turf grasses. Topography at Site Generally flat with less than 4 feet of elevation change between the recently completed borings. 2.2 Scope of Services The purpose of this report is to present a summary of our geotechnical exploration and provide generalized opinions and recommendations regarding the soil conditions and design parameters for founding of the project. Our"scope of services"was limited to the following: 1. Explore the project subsurface by means of 8 standard penetration borings extending to a maximum of depth of approximately 25 feet below existing grade,and conduct laboratory test(s)on representative samples for characterizing the index and engineering properties of the soils at the project site. 2. Prepare a report presenting our findings from our field exploration, laboratory testing,and engineering recommendations for foundation types,footing depths,allowable bearing capacity, estimated settlements,floor slab support,excavation,engineered fill,backfill,compaction and potential construction difficulties related to excavation,backfilling and drainage,below grade basement wall lateral earth pressure parameters, pavement design,and estimated stormwater infiltration design rates. Page 2 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion (ez Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 3.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS 3.1 Exploration Scope Site geotechnical drilling occurred between September 16th and 19th of 2016 with individual borings advanced at approximate locations as presented on the diagram within the appendices. NTI located the borings relative to existing site features,and determined the approximate elevation of the borings relative to a temporary benchmark(TBM). The TBM was the floor slab of the existing structure at the front entrance to the current building. Please refer to the Boring Location Diagram in the appendix for a visual dipiction of the TBM location. Based upon the provided request for proposal documents, NTI understands the elevation of this floor slab to be 986.2 feet. 3.2 Subsurface Conditions Please refer to the boring logs within the appendices for a detailed description and depths of stratum at each boring. The boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings,or were abandoned using high solids bentonite or neat cement grout as per appropriate local and state statutes. Minor settlement of the boreholes will occur. Owner is responsible for final closure of the boreholes. Based on results of the current geotechnical exploration,Table 2 provides a general depiction of subsurface conditions at the project site. Additional comment on the evaluation of recovered soil samples is presented within the report attachments. Table 2:Typical Subsurface Stratigraphy at Project Site 1 Depth to Base of Stratum Stratum below existing grade Material Description Notes 2.75 to 4.0 inches Asphalt Pavement over Aggregate base and topsoil classification 1.5 to 6.0 inches(where over by visual observation only and not Surface encountered) oAggregate Base intended to confer conformance with DOT or or other municipal specifications. 5 to 6 inches Topsoil Undocumented fill soils predominantly consisting Fill 4.5 to 13.0 feet of sandy lean clay(CL), Variably compacted with zones of fill clayey sand(SC)and poorly containing organics. graded sand with silt(SP- SM). Native soils predominantly composed of granular soils Termination depths of comprise of poorly graded Native the borings at sand(SP). Zones of sandy Soils approximately 26 feet lean clay(CL)and clayey below existing grade. sand(SC)were also encountered in select areas 1 Table summary is a generalization of subsurface conditions and may not reflect variation in subsurface strata occurring on site. The general geologic origin of retained soil samples is listed on the boring logs. Page 3 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota `roe NTI Project No.16.61673.100 3.3 Groundwater Conditions Measurable groundwater was encountered at the time of the field exploration in two of the eight borings completed. Groundwater in Boring SB-2 was encountered at approximately 4.5 feet below existing grade or an elevation of 981.1 feet. Based upon the results of the remainder of the field exploration in NTI's opinion this was a perched water condition. Boring SB-7 encountered groundwater at approximately 19.5 feet below existing grade or at an elevation of 964.8 feet. This is likely in closer relation to the static water table onsite. In addition,the onsite clay laden soils can be relatively slow draining and are conducive to the development of zones of perched water at varying elevations and locations across the project site. The installation of temporary piezometers monitored over an extended period of time would be required for a more definitive determination of the static water table onsite. Overall,the site soils are conducive to movement of groundwater both laterally and vertically. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce groundwater entry of project excavations. 3.4 Laboratory Test Program Our analysis and recommendations of this report are based upon our interpretation of the standard penetration resistance determined while sampling soils,laboratory test results and experience with similar soils from other sites near the project. The results of such tests are summarized on the boring logs or attached test forms. 4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on our present knowledge of the project. We ask that you or your design team notify us immediately if significant changes are made to project size,location or design as we would need to review our current recommendations and provide modified or different recommendations with respect to such change(s). 4.1 Project Scope We understand the proposed structure addition will include concrete foundation walls and footings for support of above grade construction. NTI's assumed foundation loads and change in grade are summarized within Table 3. Our assessment of project soils,opinions,and report recommendations are based directly on application of estimated structural loads to site soils. Page 4 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Table 3:Foundation Loads/Change in Grade/Footing Elevation Building Element Load/Condition Perimeter Strip Footings 7 kips per lineal foot or less Interior Strip Footings 7 kips per lineal foot or less Isolated Interior Column Footings 250 kips or less Exterior Column Footings 250 kips or less Change in Overall Site Grade(from original 3 feet or less ground surface) Free Standing Retaining Walls None Anticipated Basement Excavation(from final proposed grade) 10 feet or less 4.2 Site Preparation The undocumented,previously placed fill encountered in the soil borings is not considered suitable for direct support of the foundations. NTI recommends that all existing pavement,topsoil,buried organic materials,and any other manmade structures that are encountered be removed from within the building pad. In addition, NTI recommends that all previously placed undocumented fill,soft native clay soils and very loose sand soils be removed from below the foundation elements. Dependent upon the Owner's tolerance for risk of future differential settlement,a complete soil correction may be required below the basement floor slab as well. Please refer to the floor slab recommendations below for more information. We anticipate that a majority of the unsuitable soils would be excavated incidentally to attain the proposed basement level elevation. We recommend that all earthwork improvements and excavations be oversized where fill materials are placed below foundations. The minimum excavation oversize should extend per the requirements outlined in Appendix B.Table 4 provides a summary of excavation necessary to remove unsuitable materials at respective borings. Table 4:Summary of Soil Correction/Excavation Estimated Existing Ground Estimated Boring Excavation Elevation(feet, Excavation Unsuitable Soil/Material Number Elevation(feet, NTI Datum) Depth(feet) NTI Datum) SB-1 985.4 14.0 Undocumented Fill/Very Loose Sand 971.4 SB-2 985.6 13.0 Undocumented Fill 972.6 SB-3 985.2 12.0 Undocumented Fill/Very Loose Sand 973.2 SB-4 984.7 14.5 Undocumented Fill/Soft Clay 970.2 SB-5 984.8 6.0 Undocumented Fill/Soft Clay 978.8 SB-6 983.5 7.0 Undocumented Fill 976.5 SB-7 984.3 13.0 Undocumented Fill/Very Loose Sand 971.3 SB-8 984.0 5.0 Undocumented Fill 979.0 Page 5 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion �� Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should review project excavations to verify removal of unsuitable material(s)and adequate bearing support of exposed soils. All such observations should occur prior to the placement of engineering fill,or construction of footings and floor slabs. There is the potential that soil correction excavations may need to extend lower than the bottom of existing footing elevations. If this were to occur the existing structure must have sufficient temporary underpinning and shoring installed to protect the structure during the completion of the necessary soil corrections. Considering that the composition and compaction effort of existing fill soils are not documented,the prediction of the percent of re-usable material is difficult. In addition,the exact delineation of native versus undocumented fill,in granular soils,in particular,is difficult due to the limited sample size and soil disturbance due the sampling technique. For this reason,the design team should be aware that there is the potential that there may be some variation in the depth of fill encountered during site excavations as compared to the boring logs. If the Owner wishes to refine the understanding of the composition and depths of the undocumented fill soils across the site, NTI suggests that a series of test pits be advanced at the site prior to construction. We recommend that native soils at the exposed grade(i.e. base of excavations)be compacted until such materials achieve no less than 98%of the standard proctor maximum dry density(ASTM: D 698-96). The selected earth work contractor should take appropriate precautions during compaction efforts in close proximity to existing utilities or structures that are to remain in place as to not induce settlement. Sidewalls should be benched or sloped to provide safe working conditions and stability for engineered fill placement. Any oversizing that is required should be performed in accordance with the diagram and table included in Appendix A. Engineered fill should consist of onsite or imported sand with 100 percent passing the 1%:inch sieve and no more than 20 percent passing the No.200 sieve. Portions of the existing on-site granular undocumented fill soils have the potential to be re-used as engineered fill for preparation of the building pad when such soils are conditioned and placed as presented within this report. However,zones of organic laden soils were encountered within the undocumented fill zone. Any organic or debris laden soils will need to be sorted and are not considered to be suitable for reuse. Placement of structural fill should be observed and tested by an experienced technician or engineer to criteria described in Appendix B. Structural fill with moisture contents outside of the recommended range should be conditioned(dried or wetted)as appropriate prior to placement. Engineered fill for site corrective earthwork and for support of project footings should be tempered for moisture content and placed and compacted as outlined Appendix B. Page 6 of 16 (A) First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota ` e NTI Project No.16.61673.100 4.3 Shallow Foundations The following bearing recommendations are based on our understanding of the project. You should notify us of any changes made to the project size,location,design,or site grades so we can assess how such changes impact our recommendations. We assume foundation elements will impose maximum vertical loads as previously noted within this report. In our opinion,you may support the proposed structure addition by founding strip footings and interior column footings on competent, non-organic native soils,or engineered fill, providing such construction complies with the criteria established within this report. Design of footings may be based on the Table 5 maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures. Table 5:Recommended Maximum Net Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure-Conventional Shallow Foundation Construction Location Criteria Perimeter Strip Footings,Perimeter Columns:Perimeter strip footings and perimeter column footing supported on documented fill or competent native soils below depth of frost penetration. Interior Strip Footings:Interior strip footings supported on documented fill or Maximum 3,500 psf competent native soils at a depth that provides no less than 6 inches of clearance between the top of footing and underside of floor slab(for sand cushion). (All foundations) Interior Column Footings:Supported on documented fill or competent native soils at a depth that provides no less than 6 inches of clearance between the top of footing and underside of floor slab(for sand cushion). 1. Maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure recommendations predicated on footing design and construction complying with recommendations presented within this report. To minimize local failure of supporting soils,it is our opinion footing construction should comply with the International Building Code(IBC)requirements. Foundations in unheated appurtenant areas,such as stoops and canopies should be based at least 5 feet below the proposed finished grade for frost protection. Footings below structures anticipated to be heated (greater than 60 degrees F)in winter should be constructed at least 3.5 feet below proposed finished grade. Continuous strip footings under bearing walls should be at least 1 foot wider than the walls they support. Interior footings should be based at least 1.5 feet below design floor elevation. 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Settlement We estimate that the native soils,or properly compacted backfill,will provide a nominal 3 factor of safety against localized bearing failure when construction complies with report criteria and recommendations and the structural design of the foundations uses the Table 5 maximum net allowable soil bearing recommendation(s). Page 7 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 We estimate that footings loaded per report recommendations may experience long term,total settlement of approximately 1/2 to 1 inch. Differential settlement will be on the order of 25 to 50 percent of total settlement. Generally,the greatest differential settlement occurs between lightly loaded and heavily loaded footings, particularly if heavily loaded footings are located adjacent to lightly loaded strip footings. Most of the settlement will occur on first loading,as the structure is erected. The design team must take into account that the existing footings are not likely to settle to the same magnitude as the foundations for the addition. There is a potential that the total settlement of the new footings will in effect be primarily a differential settlement as compared to the existing foundations. Furthermore,total and differential movement of footings and floor slabs could be significantly greater than the above estimates if you support construction on frozen soils,the moisture content of the bearing soils significantly changes from in-situ conditions,and snow or ice lenses are incorporated into site earthwork. 4.5 Subsurface Drainage While not necessarily required for this project due to the relatively free draining nature of a majority of the onsite granular soils, NTI considers the installation of a subsurface drain system at the interior of the base of foundation walls to be a preferred practice of construction. The subsurface drain system will help to limit moisture accumulation within granular soils placed below interior floors. A drain tile installed at the exterior of the base of foundation walls is recommended to prevent hydrostatic loading on the earth retaining basement walls. Please refer to the Exterior Wall Backfill section for additional recommendations regarding the placement of the exterior drain tile system. As a general guideline,subsurface drainage consists of a geotextile and coarse drainage encased slotted or perforated pipe extending to sump basin(s) We recommend that exterior drainage be separated from interior drainage to reduce risk of cross flow and moisture infiltration below structure interior. The Owner with guidance from the project design team should weigh the benefit versus the cost of the interior subsurface drainage system to determine the need. Please contact NTI to discuss the potential risks of eliminating the interior drainage system. 4.6 Utilities Utility trenches should be backfilled in 6-inch maximum depth loose lifts. It is especially important that you compact trench backfill of underground utilities to minimize future settlement of green space and pavement areas. Please refer to Appendix B for compaction specifications. The stability of embankments along utility excavations is dependent on soil strength,site geometry, moisture content,and any surcharge load for excavated soils and equipment. Cautionary comment on excavation stability is provided within other report sections. Page 8of16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 We herein note that the Contractor is solely responsible for assessing the stability of and executing underground utility and project excavations using safe methods. Contractor is also responsible for naming the"competent individual"as per Subpart P of 29 CFR 1926.6(Federal Register-OSHA). 4.7 Slab-on-Grade Floors Option 1(Floor Slab Supported On Existing Undocumented Fill) For this alternative the Owner must be willing to accept some risk of future settlement within the floor slab. For Option 1,the existing non-organic debris free undocumented fill soils in the floor slab area would be surface compacted with shallow corrections performed in areas that exhibit instability or where organics are encountered. The floor slab would then be constructed over the surface-compacted existing non organic,debris-free undocumented fill soils. The Owner should consider that based upon the assumed low floor elevation this alternative may result in portions of the floor slab being constructed on competent native soils/documented engineered fill and other portions on undocumented soils. This has the potential to result in a non-uniform support system which may lead to differential movements across a short span. This option will likely not provide uniform subgrade support. This option has the potential for increased distress within the floor slab. If this option is selected the modulus of subgrade reaction(k)design value should be reduced to 150 pci (pounds per square inch per inch of depth).The risk of differential settlements in the slab could be reduced if the upper 1 foot,or more,of the slab subgrade is over- excavated and replaced with properly compacted granular backfill. Option 2(Floor Slab Supported On Non-Organic or Engineered Fill) If the Owner is unwilling to accept the risks associated with Option 1 then the floor slab should be constructed directly over documented engineered fill or non-organic,competent native soil as described in the Site Preparation section. For this option,the design of the floor slab may be based on an estimated modulus of subgrade reaction(k)of 200 pci. Option 2 will be based on a more uniform subgrade compared to the existing undocumented fill. The Following Applies to Both Options The final 6 inches of fill below the concrete floor slabs should consist of pit run or processed sand (sand cushion)with 100 percent material passing the 1 inch, no more than 40 percent passing the No.40 sieve and no more than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 U.S.Sieve. The moisture content of the sand cushion should be within plus or minus 2 percent of the optimum moisture content determined by the standard Proctor test. All interior at-grade floors with impervious or near impervious surfacing such as, but not limited to, paint, hardening agent,vinyl tile,ceramic tile,or wood flooring,should include provision for installation of a vapor barrier system. Historically,vapor barrier systems can consist of many different types of synthetic membrane, and can be placed either below sand cushion materials or at the underside of the concrete floor. Page 9 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion (A) Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 All such issues are contentious and have both positive and negative aspects associated with long term performance of the floor. Overall,we recommend you install some form of vapor barrier below the project floor[for at-grade and basement construction,as appropriate]. We recommend that you isolate floor slabs from other building components by placement of a nominal 1/2 inch thick expansion joint between the floor and walls,and/or columns. This construction must also apply a compatible sealant after curing of the floor slab to reduce moisture penetration though the expansion joint. As a minimum,you should install a bond breaker to isolate and reduce binding of building components. 4.8 Exterior Wall Backfill Exterior wall backfill placement and associated final grading adjacent to the building can significantly impact the performance of a structure. We understand the project will include a below grade basement level with foundation walls that retain soils. NTI recommends that the exterior backfill for below grade foundation walls shall consist of either onsite or imported non organic debris free granular soils with less than 12 percent passing the No.200 sieve. The final 1.5 to 2.0 feet of exterior backfill within lawn areas should consist of clay and topsoil while exterior backfill below sidewalks and pavements should consist of a free draining aggregate base as recommended for the respective construction. Backfill should be tempered for correct moisture content,then placed and compacted in individual lifts of exterior backfill per criteria presented within Appendix B. Placement of exterior backfill against below-grade earth retaining foundation walls should be limited until lateral restraint of the foundation walls has been installed to the satisfaction of the Structural Engineer. Final grading of exterior backfill should provide sufficient grade for positive drainage away from the structure. Foundation walls will experience lateral loading from retained soils. This lateral loading may be modeled as an equivalent fluid pressure applied to the foundation wall providing such complies with geometric conditions which support such modeling. We recommend using granular backfill designed to the Table 6"at-rest"equivalent fluid pressure for design of respective below grade foundations. Page 10 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion A) Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Table 6:Estimate of Equivalent Fluid Weight of Retained Soils Equivalent Fluid Pressures Friction "At Rest" "Active" "Passive" Angle2 Condition Condition Condition Type of Retained Soil—(Moist Unit Weight2) (deg.) (pcf) (pcf) (pcf) Sand,Sand with Silt(SP,SP-SM)3-(120 pcf) 32 55 40 375 Clayey Sand(SC)or Sandy Clay(CL)-(125 pcf) 26 70 50 320 1. The recommendations for equivalent fluid pressure are based solely on assumed conditions with respect to sloping ground,hydrostatic pressures,and/or surcharge loads and do not include a factor of safety. Design professional is cautioned that actual loads imparted to the structure will be dependent on soil conditions,site geometric considerations and surcharge loads imparted to the structure. 2. The Moist Unit Weights and Friction Angle recommendations noted above are estimates based on industry recognized empirical correlations,assumed conditions,and our experience with similar soil conditions. 3. For use of the equivalent fluid weights of the SP and SP-SM sand backfill,the backfill must extend laterally a minimum of 2 feet away from the base of the wall and extend up to the surface at an angle no greater than 60 degrees from horizontal. If other materials are used as backfill within this zone the recommendations SP or SP- SM backfill in Table 6 are not applicable. A drain tile installed at the base of foundation walls is recommended to prevent hydrostatic loading on the walls. The drain tile should be sloped to provide positive gravity drainage or to a sump pit and pump. The drain line should be surrounded by clean,free-draining granular material having less than 5 percent passing the No.200 sieve. The free-draining aggregate should be encapsulated in a filter fabric. The granular fill should extend to within 2 feet of final grade,where it should be capped with compacted clay to reduce infiltration of surface water into the drain system. Exterior backfill for at-grade non earth retaining foundations walls(if proposed)should consist of native, non-organic,debris free soils. Placement of exterior backfill against at-grade non earth retaining foundation walls should be performed concurrent with interior backfill to minimize differential loading, rotation and/or movement of the wall system. 4.9 Surface Drainage You should maintain positive drainage during and after construction of project and eliminate ponding of water on site soils. We recommend that you include provisions within construction documents for positive drainage of site. You should install sumps at critical areas around project excavations to assist in removal of seepage and runoff from site. We understand sidewalks,curbing, pavements,and green space will direct drainage away from the structure. We recommend that you provide a 5 percent gradient within 10 feet of building for drainage from lawn,and 2 percent minimum gradient from building for drainage of sidewalks/pavements. All pavements should drain to on-site storm collection,municipal collection system,or roadside ditching. Page 11 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion rit) Eagan,Minnesota 144...00° NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Roof runoff should be directed away from building by a system of interior roof and scupper drains,or rain gutters,down spouts and splash pads. It is our opinion interior roof drains plumbed directly to the storm water piping system provide the most favorable method of conveying drainage from the roof as interior drains do not freeze or discharge runoff onto exterior sidewalks and pavements. 4.10 Pavement Construction We assume project traffic will be separated into two distinct classes;heavy duty traffic comprised of refuse trucks and occasional delivery trucks and light duty traffic comprised of passenger vehicles. Our pavement recommendations are predicated on separation of this traffic. The resulting subgrade following site grading should first be scarified and re-compacted to a depth of 12 inches. A proof roll test should then be performed to determine soft or unstable subgrade areas. If rutting or localized unstable subgrade areas are observed,those areas should be subcut, moisture- conditioned,and re-compacted or removed to a stable depth. Excavations for soil corrections(if any)in paved areas should allow for a 2 foot oversize beyond the edges of the pavement. The proof roll should be performed with a tandem axle dump truck loaded to gross capacity(at least 20 tons). Acceptance criteria of the proof roll shall be limited to rut formation no more than one inch(1") depth(front or rear axles)and no pumping(rolling)observed during the visual inspection. Proof roll tests should be observed by an experienced technician or geotechnical engineer prior to placement of the aggregate base course to verify the subgrade will provide adequate pavement support. If fill is required in paved areas,we recommend that it consist of soils similar in composition to the existing native soils. If clean sand materials are utilized as engineered fill overlying clay laden soils they will need to be adequately drained as to not create a "bathtub"effect. If not adequately drained there is the potential that groundwater may collect within the void spaces of the sand and result in vertical movements during periods of freeze/thaw. Individual lifts of engineered fill in proposed paved areas should be tempered for moisture content, placed and compacted as listed in the Compaction Guidelines table in Appendix B. Estimates of minimum thicknesses for new pavement sections for this project have been based on the procedures outlined in the MnDOT Pavement Design Manual using soil parameters based on soil types. The following minimum thicknesses were estimated based upon our estimated traffic loading, limited soils information,variation across the project area,and experience with similar projects and soil conditions. The performance of stabilometer,or similar tests,were beyond the scope of this report; however,they may be performed,upon request,for an additional fee. We estimate that a properly prepared subgrade would have an average stabilometer R-value of 25. For a 20-year design pavement life and light commercial traffic volumes,Table 7 presents our thickness recommendations for flexible(bituminous)pavement. Page 12 of 16 • First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion �� Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Table 7:Recommended Flexible Pavement Thickness Design Alternative Pavement Light Duty Heavy Duty Section (Parking Stalls) (Drive Lanes/Truck Areas) Bituminous Wear Course(inches) 1.5 2.0 Bituminous Base Course(inches) 2.0 2.0 Class 5 or 7 Aggregate Base(inches) 6.0 6.0 We recommend rigid Portland cement concrete pavements be constructed at driveway aprons,trash enclosures,and other areas where point loads and turning stresses are more likely to damage the pavement. Based on the performance of concrete pavements at similar sites,we recommend the concrete pavement design alternative listed in Table 8. Table 8:Recommended Rigid Pavement Thickness Design Alternative Pavement Heavy Duty Static Loading Areas Section (Drive Lanes/Truck Areas) (Dumpsters) Unreinforced Concrete (inches) 6.0 7.0 Class 5 or 7 Aggregate Base(inches) 6.0 6.0 Pavement recommendations assume the subgrade soils and aggregate section below paved surfaces will drain to subsurface piping for eventual discharge into storm sewer,or above grade to ditching,or similar acceptable systems. Lack of surface and subsurface drainage will significantly reduce the capacity and longevity of the pavement systems indicated above. We recommend pavements receive annual maintenance,as a minimum,to correct damages to the pavement structure,clean and infill cracks which develop,and repair or resurface areas which exhibit reduced subgrade performance. The lack of maintenance can lead to moisture infiltration of the pavement structure and softening of the subgrade soils. This, in turn,can degrade the performance of the pavement system and result in poorly performing pavements with shortened life expectancy. 4.11 Stormwater Infiltration NTI assumes the project may have some onsite stormwater infiltration requirements,therefore NTI has included design parameters in the event that the infiltration of stormwater is proposed onsite. Table 9 provides an estimate of the infiltration rates for the soils encountered by our geotechnical exploration program. Page 13 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion (TAA Eagan,Minnesota `, NTI Project No.16.61673.100 Table 9:Estimated Infiltration Rates for Subsurface Soil at Project Soil Type Estimated Cumulative Infiltration Rate (inches/hr) Poorly Graded Sand(SP) 0.80 Poorly Graded Sand with Silt(SP-SM) 0.70 Sandy Lean Clay(CL)and Clayey Sand(SC) 0.06 1 All findings are approximate based on correlation of on-site soils to the Minnesota Stormwater Manual,or other published literature. We recommend further assessment of soil infiltration rate using"Double-Ring Infiltrometer"evaluation,or other similar approved methods. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Frost Considerations The clayey sand (SC)and sandy lean clay(CL)soils on this site are moderately to highly frost susceptible. Small amounts of groundwater,or infiltrated surface water,can be detrimental to the performance of the slabs and pavements. Exterior slabs and pavements should be expected to heave. If frost action needs to be eliminated in critical areas,then we recommend the use of structurally supported exterior slabs(e.g.,as structural stoops in front of building doors),as is common practice in the state of Minnesota. It is our opinion that placing non-frost susceptible material in large areas under exterior pavements and sidewalks would be exceedingly expensive and an unusual design and construction procedure in Minnesota. A transition area between structurally supported slabs or non-frost susceptible materials should be constructed at a 3H:1V back slope to reduce the potential differential frost movements in the slabs or pavements. Drain tile should be installed around the foundation perimeter and finger drains should be installed about catch basins and across low points in the pavement grades. Non-frost susceptible fill should consist of sand or gravel with less than 5 percent material passing the No.200 sieve,and at least 50 percent retained on the No.40 sieve. 5.2 Excavation Stability Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local,state or federal regulations. Excavations may need to be widened and sloped,or temporarily braced,to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Also,contractors should comply with local,state,and federal safety regulations including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. Temporary shoring must be designed in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. Page 14 of 16 610 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota Nil Project No.16.61673.100 5.3 Engineered Fill&Winter Construction The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should observe and evaluate excavations to verify removal of uncontrolled fills,topsoil and/or unsuitable material(s),and adequacy of bearing support of exposed soils. Such observation should occur prior to construction of foundations or placement of engineered fill supporting excavations. Engineered fill should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record prior to placement. In addition,the engineered fill should be tempered for correct moisture content and then place and compact individual lifts of engineered fill to criteria established within the appendices attachment. Frozen soil should never be used as engineered fill or backfill nor should you support foundations on frozen soils. Moisture freezing within the soil matrix of fine grained and/or cohesive soils produces ice lenses. Such soils gain moisture from capillary action and,with continued growth, heave with formation of ice lenses within the soil matrix. Foundations constructed on frozen soils have the potential to settle once ice lenses thaw. You should protect excavations and foundations from freezing conditions or accumulation of snow,and remove frozen soils,snow,and ice from within excavations,fill section or from below proposed foundations. Replacement soils should consist of similar materials as those removed from the excavation with moisture content, placement and compaction conforming to report criteria. 6.0 CLOSURE As the widely spaced,small diameter borings provide only a limited amount of data regarding the existing fill,the existing fill may contain soft zones,debris or significantly greater amounts of unsuitable materials than could be reasonably inferred from the boring information. Unsuitable materials may not be discovered during construction and may remain buried within the fill below the slabs and pavements, resulting in greater than anticipated settlements of the slabs and pavements. These risks cannot be eliminated without completely removing the fill, but can be reduced by thorough exploration and testing during site preparation and construction. Our conclusions and recommendations are predicated on observation and testing of the earthwork directed by Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Our opinions are based on data assumed representative of the site. However,the area coverage of borings in relation to the entire project is very small. For this and other reasons,we do not warrant conditions below the depth of our borings,or that the strata logged from our borings are necessarily typical of the site. Deviations from our recommendations by plans,written specifications,or field applications shall relieve us of responsibility unless our written concurrence with such deviations has been established. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution,other studies should be undertaken. Page 15 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion ("Z Eagan,Minnesota 444.../ Nil Project No.16.61673.100 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of FFC Properties, LLC for specific application to the proposed First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion project in Eagan, Minnesota. Northern Technologies, LLC has endeavored to comply with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice common to the local area. Northern Technologies, LLC makes no other warranty,expressed or implied. Northern Technologies,LLC Se - I hereby certify that this plan, cta,44,/------- specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Debra A.Schroeder, P.E. that I am a Duly Licensed Professional Senior Engineer Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Ryan M. Benson, P.E. Regional Manager/Principal Engineer Ryan M.Benson RMB/das Date: 09/29/2016 Reg.No.42724 Page 16 of 16 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES GENERAL NOTES WATER LEVEL SYMBOL DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY RELATIVE PROPORTIONS PARTICLE SIZES CLASSIFICATION of SOILS for ENGINEERING PURPOSES EXCAVATION OVERSIZE First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES We visually examined recovered soil samples to estimate distribution of grain sizes,plasticity, consistency, moisture condition,color,presence of lenses and seams,and apparent geologic origin. We then classified the soils according using the Unified Soil Classification System(ASTM D2488). A chart describing this classification system and general notes explaining soil sampling procedures are presented within appendices attachments. The stratification depth lines between soil types on the logs are estimated based on the available data. Insitu,the transition between type(s)may be distinct or gradual in either the horizontal or vertical directions. The soil conditions have been established at our specific boring locations only. Variations in the soil stratigraphy may occur between and around the borings,with the nature and extent of such change not readily evident until exposed by excavation. These variations must be properly assessed when utilizing information presented on the boring logs. We request that you,your design team or contractors contact NTI immediately if local conditions differ from those assumed by this report,as we would need to review how such changes impact our recommendations. Such contact would also allow us to revise our recommendations as necessary to account for the changed site conditions. FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES Soil Sampling—Standard Penetration Boring: Soil sampling was performed according to the procedures described by ASTM D-1586. Using this procedure,a 2 inch O.D.split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30 inches. After an initial set of six inches,the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12 inches is recorded (known as the penetration resistance(i.e."N-value")of the soil at the point of sampling. The N-value is an index of the relative density of cohesionless soils and an approximation of the consistency of cohesive soils. Soil Sampling—Power Auger Boring: The boring(s)was/were advanced with a 6 inch nominal diameter continuous flight auger. As a result,samples recovered from the boring are disturbed,and our determination of the depth,extend of various stratum and layers,and relative density or consistency of the soils is approximate. Soil Classification: Soil samples were visually and manually classified in general conformance with ASTM D-2488 as they were removed from the sampler(s). Representative fractions of soil samples were then sealed within respective containers and returned to the laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classification. In addition,select samples were submitted for laboratory tests. Individual sample information,identification of sampling methods,method of advancement of the samples and other pertinent information concerning the soil samples are presented on boring logs and related report attachments. • (A) First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 GENERAL NOTES DRILLING and SAMPLING SYMBOLS LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS SYMBOL DEFINITION SYMBOL DEFINITION C.S. Continuous Sampling W Moisture content-percent of dry weight P.D. 2-3/8"Pipe Drill D Dry Density-pounds per cubic foot C.O. Cleanout Tube LL,PL Liquid and plastic limits determined in accordance with ASTM D 423 and D 424 3 HSA 3'A"I.D.Hollow Stem Auger Unconfined compressive strength-pounds per square foot in accordance with ASTM D 2166-66 4 FA 4"Diameter Flight Auger 6 FA 6"Diameter Flight Auger 2%C 2'A"Casing 4 C 4"Casing D.M. Drilling Mud Pq Penetrometer reading-tons/square foot J.W. Jet Water S Torvane reading-tons/square foot H.A. Hand Auger G Specific Gravity—ASTM D 854-58 NXC Size NX Casing SL Shrinkage limit—ASTM 427-61 BXC Size BX Casing Ph Hydrogen ion content-meter method AXC Size AX casing 0 Organic content-combustion method SS 2"O.D.Split Spoon Sample M.A. Grain size analysis 2T 2"Thin Wall Tube Sample C* One dimensional consolidation 3T 3"Thin Wall Tube Sample Cly Triaxial Compression *See attached data Sheet and/or graph WATER LEVEL SYMBOL Water levels shown on the boring logs were determined at the time and under the conditions indicated. In sand,the indicated levels can be considered relatively reliable for most site conditions. In clay soils,it is not possible to determine the ground water level within the normal scope of a test boring investigation,except where lenses or layers of more pervious water bearing soil are present;and then a long period of time may be necessary to reach equilibrium. Therefore,the position of the water level symbol for cohesive or mixed soils may not indicate the true level of the ground water table. The available water level information is given at the bottom of the log sheet. DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY TERM N60 Value(corrected) TERM N60 Value(corrected) Very Loose 0—4 Soft 0-4 Loose 5—8 Medium 5-8 Medium Dense 9—16 Rather Stiff 9—15 Dense 16—30 Stiff 16—30 Very Dense Over 30 Very Stiff Over 30 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS PARTICLE SIZES TERMS RANGE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION U.S.SIEVE SIZE Trace 0—5% Boulders Over 3" A little 5—15% Gravel Coarse 3"to%" Some 15—30% Medium %"to#4 Sand Coarse #4 to#10 Medium #10 to#40 Fine #40 to#200 Silt and Clay Determined by Hydrometer Test I First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion is........" Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 CLASSIFICATION of SOILS for ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM Designation D-2487 and D2488(Unified Soil Classification System) Major Divisions Group Typical Name Classification Criteria Symbol Well—graded gravels and c aJ GW gravel-sand mixtures,little ? Cu=D60/D10 greater than 4. o Cz=(D30)2/(010 x D60)between 1&3. a or no fines. °c° f° > (.9 "= °J c Poorly graded gravels ander TA _v GP gravel-sand mixtures,little 2 Not meeting both criteria for GW materials. v o z or no fines. o i o c `ail ,° Atterberg limits E' o Silty gravels,gravel-sand- Atterberg limits .N -o GM a u below"A"line,or o o OJ " silt mixtures. " m plotting in hatched rsi O E .0o Y v•, 3 P.I.less than 4. area are borderline cu o o v 3 d V `^ c Atterberg limits .o Z N c 0 v= classifications o v Clayey gravels,gravel-sand- to i, 0 v above"A"line c o > GC o requiring use of dual o )n as clay mixtures. o 3 g o with P.I.greater symbols. c o C7 t7 C7 m than 7. y i. t� 'Y c Well-graded sands and c > a,, �, v o N a) ai a) .- Cu=D60/010 greater than 6. SW gravelly sands,little or no = > n o o " c fines. a,T.,°' o0 o Cz=(D30)2/(D10 x D60)between 1&3. N O Oe .� N w O N O ra vs � cocPoorly-graded sands and . z o . an a) v SP gravelly sands,little or no m z °c°.E Not meeting both criteria for SW materials. a t 0 fines. _ t,-^", 2 z c n e N o Atterberg limits Atterberglimits Silty sands,sand-silt o ,,J oul N s SM mixtures. o below"A"line,or plotting in hatched c ,o }'' V c N P.I.less than 4. m o. 3 al ;= 0, area are borderline y o o v) N v E Atterberg limits classifications oc LL SC Clayey sands,sand-clay u v 0 o above"A"line requiring use of dual 2 v) mixtures. with P.I.>7. symbols. Inorganic silts,very fine N ML sands,rock flour,silty or -- 0 v clayey fine sands. v) O r. _. _. —. - 0) T 0 0 Inorganic clays of low to * -c, o medium plasticity,gravelly f 0 CL v ra clays,sandy clays,silty 6 > N « E clays,lean clays. ` o Ja —._ _- _ r oN O .- t+ u 1 6 o a Organic silts and organic .c ' `° a Z OL silty clays of low plasticity. x o C 'C, ' J Q c E = v n , Inorganic silts,micaceous ,, 3 v o N MH or diatomaceous fine sands u m • oS or silts,elastic silts. Dco 5 w b o 0 F, 0 v 0 M v& — Y Lao-a.9., Inorganic clays of high v 1, . ul CH plasticity,fat clays. - 3 N E Jst .31 i u a Organic clays of medium to - w E ° Q OH high plasticity. $a <3 s J I I 0 >...V 00 0 V C0') 0 0 0 t c " Peat,muck and other '7. ,_el Pt highly organic soils. ;Rioy!o!fsg!d -" ,74) First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 EXCAVATION OVERSIZE Excavation oversize facilitates distribution of load induced stress within supporting soils. Unless otherwise superseded by report specific requirements,all construction should conform to the minimum oversize and horizontal offset requirements as presented within the diagram and associated chart. Figure 1: Excavation Excavation Back Horizontal Offset A Oversize Slope(Refer to (Refer to Chart) Rotel) Backfill Surface&Solls, Referto report for specific 1 Oversize Ratio H material type and placement \`\♦ (Referto Chart) Structure andtor Basement Unsuitable Soils(i e Excavated Materials),Referto Chart and report for requirements. Depth 0:Engineered Fill,Refer to report for material type and placement criteria Competent Soils(i.e.acceptable for support of embankment and structure),Referto report for specific requirements. Definitions Oversize Ratio H: The ratio of the horizontal distance divided by the engineered fill depth(i.e.# Horizontal/Depth D). Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Horizontal Offset A: The horizontal distance between the outside edge of footing or critical position and the crest of the engineered fill section. Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Note 1: Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local,state or federal regulations including those defined by Subpart P of Chapter 27,29 CFR Part 1926(of Federal Register). Excavations may need to be widened and sloped,or temporarily braced,to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Contractor is solely responsible for assessing stability under"means and methods". Condition Unsuitable Soil Type Horizontal Offset A Oversize Ratio H Foundation Unit Load SP,SM soils,CL&CH Equal to or greater than equal to or less than 3,000 soils with cohesion NA one(1)times Depth D psf. greater than 1,000 psf Foundation Unit Load SP,SM soils,CL&CH Equal to or greater than greater than 3,000 psf soils with cohesion less NA one(1)times Depth D than 1,000 psf Foundation Unit Load Topsoil or Peat 2 feet or width of footing, Equal to or greater than equal to or less than 3,000 whichever is greater two(2)times Depth D psf. Foundation Unit Load Topsoil or Peat 5 feet or width of footing, Equal to or greater than greater than 3,000 psf whichever is greater two(3)times Depth D �1 First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion IEagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER ISSUES PLACEMENT and COMPACTION OF ENGINEERED FILL ("Al First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 GROUNDWATER ISSUES The following presents additional comment and soil specific issues related to measurement of groundwater conditions at your project site. Note that our groundwater measurements,or lack thereof,will vary depending on the time allowed for equilibrium to occur in the borings. Extended observation time was not available during the scope of the field exploration program and,therefore,groundwater measurements as noted on the borings logs may or may not accurately reflect actual conditions at your site. Seasonal and yearly fluctuations of the ground water level,if any,occur. Perched groundwater may be present within sand and silt lenses bedded within cohesive soil formations. Groundwater typically exists at depth within cohesive and cohesionless soils. Documentation of the local groundwater surface and any perched groundwater conditions at the project site would require installation of temporary piezometers and extended monitoring. We have not performed such groundwater evaluation due to the scope of services authorized for this project. We anticipate that a system of sump pits and pumps located outside of the foundation areas would be suitable for control if perched groundwater were to be encountered. If excavations are advanced into a static groundwater table within underlying granular soils a well point system would likely be a more suitable method of control. NTI cautions that such seepage may be heavy and will vary based on seasonal and annual precipitation,and ground related impacts in the vicinity of the project. • I First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 PLACEMENT and COMPACTION OF ENGINEERED FILL Unless otherwise superseded within the body of the Geotechnical Exploration Report,the following criteria shall be utilized for placement of engineered fill on project. This includes,but is not limited to earthen fill placement to improve site grades,fill placed below structural footings,fill placed interior of structure,and fill placed as backfill of foundations. Engineered fill placed for construction,if necessary should consist of natural, non-organic,competent soils native to the project area. Such soils may include,but are not limited to gravel,sand,or clays with Unified Soil Classification System(ASTM D2488)classifications of GW,SP,or SM. Use of silt or clayey silt as project fill will require additional review and approval of project Geotechnical Engineer of Record.Such soils have USCS classifications of ML, MH, ML-CL, MH-CH. Use of topsoil,marl,peat, other organic soils construction debris and/or other unsuitable materials as fill is not allowed. Such soils have USCS classifications of OL,OH, Pt. Engineered fill,classified as clay,should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is equal to and no more than 3 percent above the optimum content for as defined by the appropriate proctor test. Likewise,engineered fill classified as gravel or sand should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is within 3 percent of the optimum content. All engineered fill for construction should be placed in individual 8 inch maximum depth lifts. Each lift of fill should be compacted by large vibratory equipment until the in-place soil density is equal to or greater than the criteria established within the following tabulation. Compaction Criteria(%respective Proctor)1 Type of Construction Clay Sand or Gravel General Embankment Fill Min.95 Min.95 Engineered Fill below Foundations NA Min.98 Engineered Fill below Floor Slabs NA Min.98 Engineered Fill placed as Pavement Aggregate Base NA Min.100 Engineered Fill placed to within 3 feet of pavement Min.95 Min.95 aggregate base Engineered Fill placed within 3 feet of pavement Min.100 Min.100 aggregate base Note 1 Unless otherwise required,compaction shall be based on the Standard Proctor Test(ASTM D698). Density tests should be taken during engineered fill placement to document earthwork has achieved necessary compaction of the material(s). Recommendations for interior fill placement and backfill of foundation walls are presented within other sections of this report. First Fiduciary Corporation Building Expansion Eagan,Minnesota NTI Project No.16.61673.100 APPENDIX C BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM SOIL BORING LOGS 0111111 W 1 N Q , , ' z 1 14P ii. ' I 1 I 1 1 1 Iu, 1 L N m 1 0 L N Tom' mOO 7, ..: I v Y t:- CL, I C Co , yk,t3 ~ i3L. I m C Q y -'t r-1 m - I N m m N N N ._..,. . ,, -. .- CA m I a Q C N COCC w C O S a a g p co 2 O Ii r•i o `° o W O 1..� O CU ii 40 U C C U i o 2a) o O oco m a w •'- (> WD H O O u_ 03 co u_ w Z Z Z Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-1 NTI 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 NORTHERN amRN P:651-389-4191 ORTHELOGIES,LLC www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/19/16 COMPLETED 9/19/16 GROUND ELEVATION 985.4 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING ---No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING --- CAVE IN(ft) 12 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG Ell o Z w o LIMITS w H,-. a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 00 11.1" O Z J I N z ?z o U _X w Lth n J z01: m0> v 2O L0 � oz > Oz �Z < 0 'oJ o 0 °- _� IBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(3 1/2 Inches) ,- 9851, - i�i� o n 1 APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE(4 Inches) I 9841, AU i)*ii CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to medium - �4�� * grained,moist,trace gravel,trace organics ♦�♦ (Fill) iii SS 1-1-2-4 �:.:.: 2 25 (3) _ . • i :i .•.0. �ODi 5 •i�i�i� F ..*:.. X��•�•� SS 50 1-1-3-5 w •..♦ - :..�.� 3 (4) •..♦ 2_ _•.;.;.7.0 978.4 rd :•:••: POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,(SP-SM)brown, ▪- •%%%• fine to medium grained,moist,trace gravel SS 75 5-4-4-5 30 .�0•.�. (Fill) 4 (8) 10 .pip•. 'A' • p• 103 s Q�.:.* X SS 42 3-4-4-1 EO�.O.O 5 (8) • .�00 o_ .•!,!4.12.0 973.4 POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine _ • grained,moist,very loose to loose,trace gravelX SS 33 1-1-3-5 (Alluvial) 6 (4) - 15 .•••••:•••••,.. X SS 2-4-4-5 7 17 (8) 3 1 y a- - s- - 5 20 , X SS 1-3-5-2 8 67 (8) o• 25 h ..••':•.•.. A SS 1-2-4-6 9 63 (6) 26.5 958.9 Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. • Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-2 (00-;) 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 P:651-389-4191 sees�u www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/19/16 COMPLETED 9/19/16 GROUND ELEVATION 985.6 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A VAT TIME OF DRILLING 4.50 ft/Elev 981.10 ft Likely perched LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING --- CAVE IN(ft) 13 FROST DEPTH(ft) -- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG a o w o LIMITS Luwo = w ~ r— =O m z-i H . moPzoU w o_O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J2 >O On¢ Luz: Z ocow 1- E-H UX Z til ov �J �Z 0-0 O mOUZ UV }v OZ dNM Po IL u-1 O d' mo gm gJ Z 0 co o: o- o 0 - 5- ,.. s BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(3 1/2 Inches) 9Ma 4+: 4 APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE(1 1/2 Inches) 119as 2i AU .•p:.: 20 CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to medium 983.6 - :•* grained,moist,trace gravel g- :'4S (Fill) I SS 2-3-2-4 i; ::::$ POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,(SP-SM)brown 2 33 (5) 14 - •:•:•: to dark brown,fine to medium grained,moist,trace :•;.;. 4.5 v gravel 981.1 5 •;p•: (Fill) / ;•••;• CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to mediumX SS 1-1-1-1 - ❖:•i grained,saturated,trace gravel 3 42 (2) E .ii: (Fill) 00.• .OHO _ v.., SS 2-1-1-3 g i Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-3 rA") NT1 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 M sauc P:651-389-4191 www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/16/16 COMPLETED 9/16/16 GROUND ELEVATION 985.2 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING ---No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING --- CAVE IN(ft) 19 FROST DEPTH(ft) -- AFTER DRILLING -- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG nu. o z 1 W o LIMITS UI — -a >- c-ow W ' " r co diG =U' m WD nZJ I—� H HZ U C W W" EL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a� p� mp> UV Oz �2 Q2 �o 0 Ce (� 2 w o d Q �O -J 0_ Z 0 CO Ce a -*WV'' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(3 1/2 Inches) ps850, •.;�; • - •• : CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to medium AU i'' grained,moist,trace gravel,trace organics - i:+ Fill R S:44 X��0 SS 50 4-5-5-7 15 o ::i:i:i 2 (10) 34 - .wi 6 4VOi4.5 980.7 5 CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to medium grained,moist,very loose to loose,trace gravel,trace SS 50 1-2-2-4 _ organics 3 (4) (Alluvial) � X SS 58 2-3-2-4 1 4 (5) F10 l • NOTE:Organic content at 9.5 feet=2.9%. XS5S 63 (4) o NOTE:Brown to dark brown below 12 feet. s SS 1-2-4-4 6 (6) _ X50 ,'f//14.5 970.7 15 • POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine 5grained,moist,medium dense,trace gravel X SS 58 3-5-6-8 - (Alluvial) 7 (11) a a- s_ _ I 20 :•••':::::.:1. X SS 4-6-8-8 8 58 (14) ° 25 3 SS 3-5-8-8 9 58 (13) 958.7 6 Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-4 rAi) NT1 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 «euTMaw P:651-389-4191 MM�m►ocies�u www.NTIGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/16/16 COMPLETED 9/16/16 GROUND ELEVATION 984.7 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING ---No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING -- CAVE IN(ft) 20 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG w iz W a LIMITS UI i >- NW ix• .. a= CLO MATERIAL DESCRIPTION �g >0 0j¢ w y Z u)w ..e i— �1— Ux z ou.ry C9J °— OOct m0UZ Uv >- oz D� �g �0 LI 5=, Z 0 Cl) Q! Cl. 0 �O J 0 a_ 0;.• 9 r\ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(2 3/4 Inches) rvc#14 6 - X+ CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,fine to medium AU +::: grained,moist,trace gravel - •:•:. (Fill) 000 . *. o- •.•.* X2 2-5-6-4 (11) ♦.♦ 2 21 (11) - �... 5 O'O .�� X SS 42 1-6-5-1 i'i'i 3 (11) .. :!:!:_7.0 977.7 SANDY LEAN CLAY,(CL)dark brown,moist,soft,trace - , gravel X SS 33 1-2-2-3 - (Alluvial) 4 (4) l 10 ,, $ Ji. )( 93 63 1-2-2-2 i_ 5 (4) w- / _ NOTE:Organic content at 12 feet=3.0%. °_ SS 46 1-1-3-4 21 \ g (4) — I 14.5 970.2 15 POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine grained,moist,loose to medium dense,trace gravel X SS 33 1-3-4-2 w_ (Alluvial) 7 (7) a 9 U a- w- - 20 :.` , X SS 1-4-6-7 8 50 (10) ° 25 ; X SS 2-4-4-5 9 58 (8) 8 %' 26.5 958.2 ra 0 Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. r Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-5 rk NMI- 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 *«�r P:651-389-4191 ceauc www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC _ PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/16/16 COMPLETED 9/16/16 GROUND ELEVATION 984.8 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING ---No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING --- CAVE IN(ft) 22 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG a z w o LIMITS U riff, > v)W d F. off co ii, 0-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _12 >0 0,¢ w N z n cnw -H- H� 0w z_ oV � aD OW cn0> Uv }v OZ d- Q2 N0 LL <z c)z CK a I-U o 2o JJ aJ Z 0 0 a xv;,3 .1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(4 Inches) x,_984.5. - •p••p POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,(SP-SM)dark AU :44. brown,fine to medium grained,moist,trace gravel ••44.2.0 (Fill) 982.8 •:+:• POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,(SP-SM)brown, SS 2-2-1-1 p••• fine to medium grained,moist,trace gravel 17 12 V.*, (Fill) 2 (3) s_ ••••••• F 5 '•eii 5.0 979.8 H SANDY LEAN CLAY,(CL)dark brown,moist,soft to SS 33 1-1-3-1 medium,trace gravel,trace organics 3 (4) S i/// (Alluvial) - -. SS 38 1-2-4-1 4 (6) 4 10 //` /�f 10.0 974.8 a POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine SS 67 2-5-6-3 q_ grained,moist,medium dense,trace gravel 5 (11) (Alluvial) w-i ::'::: ::.:: SS 1-5-6-2 "4- 6 58 (11) 15 L'4 •:::;::•:: X SS 4-6-7-5 7 58 (13) k F-- 20 y SS 3-5-6-7 - 8 50 (11) f 25 :: i ::%.;:.:.::::1. X SS 3-5-7-4 9 67 (12) -:•••• •••••::26.5 958.3 s Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-6 NTI 6160 Carmen Ave.E PAGE 1 OF 1 Inver Grove Heights,MN,55076 • e• au aauc P:651-389-4191 www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/19/16 COMPLETED 9/19/16 GROUND ELEVATION 983.5 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING ---No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING -- CAVE IN(ft) 10 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG a z l w o LIMITS U r� > cnw w 0 r co H V 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ....3 j l Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-7 NT1 en Ave.E n160 err G orve Heights,MN,55076 PAGE 1 OF 1 INNIMIIIMI�iaruaas.Lu P.651-389-4191 www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/19/16 COMPLETED 9/19/16 GROUND ELEVATION 984.3 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A VAT TIME OF DRILLING 19.50 ft/Elev 964.80 ft LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING -- CAVE IN(ft) 12 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING --- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG a o z w o LIMITS o 'L9 fA W d CII-- I— a0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION urg >8U' 0�¢ way zf 1w Qr 2H 6—X z_ ov �J o� m0> }v Oz a� Q� �o Qz w Uz a Q �O JJ aJ gz 0 co w rL N'k' I • TOPSOIL(5 Inches) / q 44;.;- ��.�� CLAYEY SAND,(SC)dark brown,tine to medium AU •O.•. grained,moist,trace gravel,trace organics - :::0 (Fill) •iii X SS 1-1-2-3 o t.::$ 2 13 (3) %% 5 i•:•O N •+: X SS 8 1-3-3-9 N- .•••••. 3 (6) •ppi•: -- • Oi rd Oiii - •:,eb.8.0 976.3 SS 25 1-1-1-1 POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine 4 (2) - grained,moist to saturated,very loose to loose,trace w gravel = 10 (Alluvial) s X SS 1-1-1-2 5 33 (2) w- XSS 1-1-3-4 - 6 50 (4) 15 `• y SS 4-4-4-5 - / 7 67 (8) a s a- w- 20 Q SS 7-4-4-5 ?, • •• • X8 71 (8) 25 r SS 1-2-2-7 _ _ 9 50 (4) 3 26.5 957.8 Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. 0 y Inver Grove Heights BORING NUMBER SB-8 NTI- en Ave.E n1 err G r60 ove Heights,MN,55076 PAGE 1 OF 1 Nirtilemallessau P:651-389-4191 www.NTlGeo.com CLIENT FFC Properties,LLC PROJECT NAME FFC Building Expansion PROJECT NUMBER 16.61673.100 PROJECT LOCATION Eagan,MN DATE STARTED 9/19/16 COMPLETED 9/19/16 GROUND ELEVATION 984 ft HOLE SIZE 6 1/2 in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in H.S.A AT TIME OF DRILLING —No groundwater encountered LOGGED BY Robert Hawkins CHECKED BY Steve Gerber AT END OF DRILLING --- CAVE IN(ft) 12 FROST DEPTH(ft) --- AFTER DRILLING -- NOTES Temporary Benchmark Elevation=986.2(Based off of Front Entrance Floor Slab) ATTERBERG a z W o LIMITS o > 0_ > fA- ui c } co H€ I-1-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION IW m w d O Z—' ~w Z Z U X W w a0 ow Ealo j Y% D— N1-- ° - �~ HW Et Z a 0 2z U 0 U >- Oz C7- g- coZ co ce ._•, 3 r BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(3 1/2 Inches) P-'483 7' - ;•;.;.;°R '1 APPARENT AGGREGATE BASE(6 Inches) r9832 AU •.;•;•: POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT,(SP-SM)dark - •;•.•;•2'0 brown to brown,fine to medium grained,moist,trace 962'0 4�� : gravel �� '- •iii• (Fill) SS 6-5-11-15 58 4 4,1- •:::$ CLAYEY SAND,(SC)brown,fine to medium grained, 2 (16) *As. moist,trace gravel G 5 •iii 5.0 (Fill) 979.0 N POORLY GRADED SAND,(SP)light brown,fine SS 42 7-11-10-8 _ grained,moist,dense to medium dense,trace gravel 3 (21) (Alluvial) _ � S 50 6-7-9-12 (16) w 10 . e ` SS 12-5-6-7 c_ / 5 58 (11) g ::'•::::-:..:: X SS 12-4-5-5 i'- -• 6 67 (9) 2- 15 y SS 67*:::',.:.•:: X 36 j5 a- 20 ,.; X SS 3-6-6-8 �- 8 75 (12) 1 s ° 25 .:::':::::. X SS 3-5-6-9 u- 9 75 (11) 26.5 957.5 0 Bottom of borehole at 26.5 feet. RECEIvED COMcheck Software Version 4.0.5.5 MAR 1 20p irrli Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: 90.1 (2010)Standard CITY COPY Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Location: Eagan,Minnesota Climate Zone: 6a Project Type: Addition Vertical Glazing/Wall Area: 10% Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 4120 Lexingtonway Toni Sullivan Eagan,MN 55123 Collins Electrical Construction Co. 278 State Street St Paul,MN 55107 651-242-5586 • tsullivan@collinsmn.com Building Area Floor Area 1-Office(Office):Nonresidential 5206 Envelope Assemblies Assembly Gross Area Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget U- or R-Value R-Value U-Factor Factorw Perimeter Exterior Wall 1:Wood-Framed,24"o.c.,[Bldg.Use 1 -Office] 4201 13.0 7.5 0.050 0.051 Window 1:Wood Frame,Pert Specs.:Product ID na,SHGC 0.40, 400 --- --- 0.350 0.350 [Bldg.Use 1-Office](b) Door 1:Glass(>50%glazing):Nonmetal Frame,Entrance Door,Pert 24 --- --- 0.800 0.350 Specs.:Product ID na,SHGC 0.40,[Bldg.Use 1 -Office](b) Door 2:Insulated Metal,Swinging,[Bldg.Use 1-Office] 21 --- --- 0.700 0.700 Floor 1:Slab-On-Grade:Heated,Vertical 4 ft.,[Bldg.Use 1 -Office](c) 226 --- 10.0 0.780 0.860 Roof 1:Attic Roof with Wood Joists,[Bldg.Use 1-Office] 3130 22.0 22.0 0.023 0.027 (a)Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY,and are not code requirements. (b)Fenestration product performance must be certified in accordance with NFRC and requires supporting documentation. (c)Slab-On-Grade proposed and budget U-factors shown in table are F-factors. Project Notes Electrical/Lighting Design Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 1 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Envelope PASSES:Design 2%better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application.The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1(2010)Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.0.5.5 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist. Todd Mohagen,AIA-Principal Name-Title Signature i Date Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:vobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 2 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck COMcheck Software Version 4.0.5.5 rift Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: 90.1 (2010)Standard Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Project Type: Addition Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 4120 Lexingtonway Toni Sullivan Eagan, MN 55123 Collins Electrical Construction Co. 278 State Street St Paul,MN 55107 651-242-5586 tsullivan@collinsmn.com Allowed Interior Lighting Power A B C D Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts (ft2) Watts/ft2 (B X C) 1-office f1 (Common Space Types:Office-Enclosed) 2852 1.11 3166 2-office f2(Common Space Types:Storage) 2354 0.63 1483 Total Allowed Watts= 4649 Proposed Interior Lighting Power A B C D E Fixture ID:Description/Lamp/Wattage Per Lamp/Ballast Lamps/ #of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. 1-office f1 (Common Space Types:Office-Enclosed) LED 2:R:Recess DN Light:LED Other Fixture Unit 13W: 1 10 13 130 LED 2:R1:Recess DN Light:LED Other Fixture Unit 13W: 1 18 13 234 LED 10:OW:Oxygen wall sconce:LED Linear 11W: 1 2 12 24 LED 10:DW1:Wall sconce:LED Linear 11W: 1 2 12 24 LED 3:SR4:LED Wraparound:LED Linear 33W: 1 5 36 180 LED 5:SC24:LED UC 24":LED Undercabinet Unit 11.4W: 1 3 10 30 LED 6:DP:LED Pendant:LED Other Fixture Unit 6.5W: 1 3 10 30 LED 6:RW:Direct Spot LED:LED Other Fixture Unit 6.5W: 1 3 10 30 LED 8:SLS8:LED Direct/Indirect Linear:LED Other Fixture Unit 36W: 1 6 64 384 LED 9:S2:LED Strip Light:LED Linear 22W: 1 1 23 23 2-office f2(Common Space Types:Storage) LED 2:RSL:Recess DN Light:LED Other Fixture Unit 13W: 1 2 13 26 LED 2:RSH:Recess DN Light:LED Other Fixture Unit 13W: 1 2 13 26 LED 2:R:Recess DN Light:LED Other Fixture Unit 13W: 1 13 13 169 LED 8:SLS8:LED Direct/Indirect Linear:LED Other Fixture Unit 36W: 1 9 64 576 LED 3:SR4:LED Wraparound:LED Linear 33W: 1 2 36 72 LED 5:SC24:LED UC 24":LED Undercabinet Unit 11.4W: 1 2 10 20 LED 10:DW:Oxygen wall sconce:LED Linear 11W: 1 3 12 36 Total Proposed Watts= 2014 Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 3 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 57 better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented In this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with this permit application.The proposed Interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1(2010)Standard requirements inICOMcheck Version 4.0.5.3 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Check r ram 5w.aJAri �- -23-2.817 Name-Title S nature Date Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/23/17 Data filename: P:1Sullivan\4120 Shell Energy Calcs\4120 Shell Energy Code Ashrea 2010.cck Page 2 of 7 COMcheck Software Version 4.0.5.3 Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: 90.1 (2010)Standard Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Project Type: Addition Exterior Lighting Zone 2(Neighborhood business district) Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 4120 Lexingtonway Toni Sullivan Eagan,MN 55123 Collins Electrical Construction Co. 278 State Street St Paul,MN 55107 651-242-5586 tsultivan@collinsmn.com Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A B C D E Area/Surface Category Quantity Allowed Tradable Allowed Watts Watts/Unit Wattage (B X C) Parking Lot Addn(Parking area) 7512 ft2 0.06 Yes 451 Total Tradable Watts(a)= 451 Total Allowed Watts= 451 Total Allowed Supplemental Watts(b)= 600 (a)Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b)A supplemental allowance equal to 600 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces. Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A B C D E Fixture ID:Description/Lamp I Wattage Per Lamp/Ballast Lamps/ #of Fixture (C X D) Fixture Fixtures Watt. Parking Lot Addn(Parking area 7512 ft2):Tradable Wattage LED 14:XP1:Single Head/Pole Mtd:LED Roadway-Parking Unit 223W: 1 3 235 705 LED 2:XR3:Exterior Dn Lt LED A Lamp 25W: 1 3 21 63 Total Tradable Proposed Watts= 768 Exterior Lighting PASSES:Design 27°,better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with this permit application.The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1(2010)Standard requirements I COMcheck Version 4.0.5.3 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklis rONi 0U-i1/P J ! ( . ' 23- 2o17 Name-Title gnature Date Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/23/17 Data filename: P:1Sullivan14120 Shell Energy Calcs\4120 Shell_Energy Code Ashrea 2010.cck Page 3 of 7 COMcheck Software Version 4.0.5.5 Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: 90.1 (2010)Standard Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Location: Eagan,Minnesota Climate Zone: 6a Project Type: Addition Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 4120 Lexingtonway Toni Sullivan Eagan,MN 55123 Collins Electrical Construction Co. 278 State Street St Paul,MN 55107 651-242-5586 tsullivan@collinsmn.com Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type&Description 1 HVAC System 1 (Single Zone): Heating:1 each-Central Furnace,Gas,Capacity=120 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency=92.00%Et,Required Efficiency=80.00%Et Cooling:1 each-Split System,Capacity=60 kBtu/h,Air-Cooled Condenser,No Economizer,Economizer exception:None Proposed Efficiency=14.00 SEER,Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None SYSTEM COMPLIANCE FAILS:Economizer requirements have not been met. 1 HVAC System 2(Single Zone): Heating:1 each-Central Furnace,Gas,Capacity=100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency=92.00%Et,Required Efficiency=80.00%Et Cooling:1 each-Split System,Capacity=48 kBtu/h,Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency=14.00 SEER,Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None 1 Water Heater 2: Gas Storage Water Heater,Capacity:40 gallons,Input Rating:40 Btu/h Proposed Efficiency:0.66 EF,Required Efficiency:0.54 EF Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with this permit application.The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1(2010)Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.0.5.5 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist. Randy Tupper ___�,✓ , _..�]__... 03/24/17 Name-Title Signature - Date Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 6 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck COMcheck Software Version 4.0.5.5 11 ribt Inspection Checklist Energy Code: 90.1 (2010) Standard Requirements: 27.0%were addressed directly in the COMcheck software Text in the "Comments/Assumptions" column is provided by the user in the COMcheck Requirements screen. For each requirement,the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented, or that an exception is being claimed.Where compliance is itemized in a separate table, a reference to that table is provided. Section - # Plan Review Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 4.2.2,5.4. Plans and/or specifications provide all ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 3.1.1,5.7 information with which compliance ❑Does Not [PR1]' can be determined for the building :Not Observable Location on plans/spec:Cover Sht envelope and document where exceptions to the standard are ONot Applicable claimed. 4.2.2,6.4. Plans,specifications,and/or ❑Complies 4.2.1,6.7. calculations provide all information ODoes Not 2 with which compliance can be [PR2]' determined for the mechanical ONot Observable systems and equipment and ONot Applicable document where exceptions to the standard are claimed. Load calculations per acceptable engineering standards and handbooks. 4.2.2,7.7. Plans,specifications,and/or ❑Complies 1,10.4.2 calculations provide all information ODoes Not [PR3]' with which compliance can be determined for the service water ❑Not Observable heating systems and equipment and ONot Applicable document where exceptions to the standard are claimed. Hot water system sized per manufacturer's sizing guide. 4.2.2,8.4. Plans,specifications,and/or ❑Complies Requirement will be met. 1.1,8.4.1. calculations provide all information ODoes Not 2,8.7 with which compliance can be [PRETdetermined for the electrical systems :Not Observable and equipment and document where ❑Not Applicable exceptions are claimed. Feeder connectors sized in accordance with approved plans and branch circuits sized for maximum drop of 3%. 4.2.2,9.4. Plans,specifications,and/or DComplies 4,9.7 calculations provide all information ODoes Not [PR4]' with which compliance can be determined for the interior lighting ONot Observable and electrical systems and equipment ONot Applicable and document where exceptions to the standard are claimed. Information provided should include interior lighting power calculations,wattage of bulbs and ballasts,transformers and control devices. 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 7 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section # Plan Review Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 9.7 Plans,specifications,and/or ❑Complies [PR811 calculations provide all information ❑Does Not with which compliance can be determined for the exterior lighting ONot Observable and electrical systems and equipment ❑Not Applicable and document where exceptions to the standard are claimed.Information provided should include exterior lighting power calculations,wattage of bulbs and ballasts,transformers and control devices. 6.7.2.4 Detailed instructions for HVAC ❑Complies [PR5]1 systems commissioning included on ODoes Not the plans or specifications for projects ❑Not Observable >=50,000 ft2. ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 8 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Footing/Foundation Plans Verified Field Verified # Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 5.5.3.3 Below-grade wall insulation R- R- R-_ ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FO1]2 value. ❑Does Not table for values. ONot Observable ❑Not Applicable 5.5.3.5 Slab edge insulation R-value. R- R- Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FO3]2 ❑ Unheated ❑ Unheated ❑Does Not table for values. ❑ Heated ❑ Heated ONot Observable O Not Applicable 5.8.1.2 Slab edge insulation installed per ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FO4]2 manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not ONot Observable Location on plans/spec: Sht.A003 ❑Not Applicable 5.5.3.5 Slab edge insulation ft ft OComplies See the Envelope Assemblies [FO5]2 depth/length. ❑Does Not table for values. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 5.8.1.7.3 Insulation in contact with the ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FO7]i ground has<=0.3%water ❑Does Not absorption rate per ASTM C272. Location on plans/spec: ONot Observable Sht.A003 ONot Applicable 6.4.3.8 Freeze protection and snow/ice ❑Complies [FO9]3 melting system sensors for future ❑Does Not connection to controls. ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.4.1.5 Bottom surface of floor structures R- R- ❑Complies Exception: Requirement [FO11]3 incorporating radiant heating ODoes Not does not apply. insulated to >=R-3.5. ONot Observable Location on plans/spec: ❑Not Applicable N/A See the Envelope Assemblies table for values. Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 9 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Framing/Rough-In Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 5.4.3.2 Factory-built fenestration and ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR1]3 doors are labeled as meeting air ODoes Not leakage requirements. ONot Observable DNot Applicable 5,4.3.4 Vestibules are installed where ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR4]3 building entrances separate ODoes Not conditioned space from the Location on plans/spec: exterior,and meet exterior ONot Observable Sht.200 envelope requirements.Doors ONot Applicable have self-closing devices,and are >=7 ft apart. 5.5.4.3a Vertical fenestration U-Factor. U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FR8]1 ODoes Not table for values. ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 5.5.4.3b Skylight fenestration U-Factor. U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FR9]1 ODoes Not table for values. O Not Observable DNot Applicable 5.5.4.4.1 Vertical fenestration SHGC value. SHGC: SHGC:_ ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FR10]1 ODoes Not table for values. ONot Observable [Not Applicable 5.5.4.4.2 Skylight SHGC value. SHGC: SHGC:_ ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [FR11]1 ODoes Not table for values. '❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 5.8,2.1 Fenestration products rated in ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR1212 accordance with NFRC. ODoes Not DNot Observable Location on plans/spec: Sht.A003 DNot Applicable 5.8.2.2 Fenestration products are ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR13]1 certified as to performance labels DDoes Not or certificates provided. ❑Not Observable Location on plans/spec: Sht A003 DNot Applicable 5.8.2.3,5. U-factor of opaque doors U- U- DComplies See the Envelope Assemblies 5.3.6 associated with the building ❑ Swinging ❑ Swinging (=bees Not table for values. [FR14]2 thermal envelope meets ❑ Nonswinging ❑ Nonswinging Not Observable requirements. ❑ DNot Applicable 5.4.3.1 Continuous air barrier is ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [FR15]1 wrapped,sealed,caulked, ODoes Not gasketed,and/or taped in an ❑Not Observable Location on plans/spec: approved manner,except in Sht 003 semiheated spaces and in ONot Applicable climate zones 1-6. Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\]obs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 10 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck • Section # Plumbing Rough-In Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 7.4.4.1 Temperature controls installed on .❑Complies [PL2]3 service water heating systems ❑Does Not (<=120°F to maximum temperature ❑Not Observable for intended use). ❑Not Applicable 7.4.6 Heat traps installed on non-circulating ❑Complies [PL4]3 storage water tanks. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 11 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Mechanical Rough-In Plans Verified Field Verified Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 6.4.1.4,6. HVAC equipment efficiency Efficiency: Efficiency: ❑Complies See the Mechanical Systems list 4.1.5 verified. Non-NAECA HVAC ODoes Not for values. [ME1]2 equipment labeled as meeting 90.1. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.4.1 Stair and elevator shaft vents ❑Complies [ME3]3 have motorized dampers that ODoes Not automatically close. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.4.2, Outdoor air and exhaust systems ❑Complies 6.4.3.4.3 have motorized dampers that ❑Does Not [ME4]3 automatically shut when not in ONot Observable use and meet maximum leakage rates.Check gravity dampers ONot Applicable where allowed. 6.4.3.4.5 Enclosed parking garage ❑Complies [ME39]3 ventilation has automatic ODoes Not contaminant detection and ONot Observable capacity to stage or modulate fans to 50%or less of design ONot Applicable capacity. 6.4.3.4.4 Ventilation fans>0.75 hp have ❑Complies [ME5]3 automatic controls to shut off fan ODoes Not when not required. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.9 Demand control ventilation ❑Complies [ME6]1 provided for spaces>500 ft2 and ODoes Not >40 people/1000 ft2 occupant ONot Observable density and served by systems ONot Applicable with air side economizer,auto pp icable modulating outside air damper control,or design airflow>3,000 cfm. 6.4.3.10 Single zone HVAC systems with ❑Complies See the Mechanical Systems list [ME40]z fan motors>=5 hp have variable ODoes Not for values. airflow controls.Air conditioning ONot Observable equipment with a cooling ONot Applicable >=110,000 Btu/h has variable airflow controls. 6.4.3.10 Single zone HVAC systems with ❑Complies See the Mechanical Systems list [ME40]z fan motors>=5 hp have variable ODoes Not for values. airflow controls.Air conditioning ONot Observable equipment with a cooling capacity>=110,000 Btu/h has ONot Applicable variable airflow controls. 6.4.4.1.1 Insulation exposed to weather ❑Complies [ME7]3 protected from damage. ODoes Not Insulation outside of the ONot Observable conditioned space and associated ONot Applicable with cooling systems is vaporpp e retardant. 6.4.4.1.2 HVAC ducts and plenums R- R- ❑Complies [ME8]2 insulated.Where ducts or ODoes Not plenums are installed in or under a slab,verification may need to :Not Observable occur during Foundation ONot Applicable Inspection. 6.4.4.1.3 HVAC piping insulation thickness. in. in. ❑Complies [ME9]2 Where piping is installed in or ODoes Not under a slab,verification may ONot Observable need to occur during Foundation Inspection. ONot Applicable 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 12 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Mechanical Rough-In Plans Verified I Field Verified Inspection Value ( Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 6.4.4.1.4 Thermally ineffective panel DComplies [ME41]3 surfaces of sensible heating ODoes Not panels have insulation >=R-3.5. ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 6,4.4.2.1 Ducts and plenums sealed based DComplies [ME10]2 on static pressure and location. ODoes Not ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.4.2.2 Ductwork operating>3 in.water DComplies [ME11]3 column requires air leakage ODoes Not testing. ONot Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.4.4.2.2 Ductwork operating >3 in.water DComplies [ME11]3 column requires air leakage ODoes Not testing. ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 6.5.1,6.5. Air economizers provided where DComplies 1.1,6.5.1. required,meet the requirements ODoes Not 3 for design capacity,control [ME12]1 signal,ventilation controls, high- ONot Observable limit shut-off,integrated ONot Applicable economizer control,and provide a means to relieve excess outside air during operation. 6.5.2.3 Dehumidification controls DComplies [ME19]3 provided to prevent reheating, ODoes Not recooling,mixing of hot and cold airstreams or concurrent heating ❑Not Observable and cooling of the same ONot Applicable airstream. • 6.5.3.3 Multiple zone VAV systems with DComplies See the Mechanical Systems list [ME42]3 DDC of individual zone boxes ODoes Not for values. have static pressure setpoint reset controls. ENot Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5.3.3 Multiple zone VAV systems with ❑Complies See the Mechanical Systems list [ME42]3 DDC of individual zone boxes ODoes Not for values. have static pressure setpoint reset controls. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5.4.1 HVAC pumping systems>10 hp DComplies [ME25]3 designed for variable fluid flow. ODoes Not ONot Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5.6.1 Exhaust air energy recovery on DComplies [ME56]1 systems meeting Table 6.5.6.1. ❑Does Not [Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5,7.1.1 Kitchen hoods>5,000 cfm have DComplies [ME32]2 make up air>=50%of exhaust ODoes Not air volume. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.5.7.1.5 Approved field test used to DComplies [ME49]3 evaluate design air flow rates ODoes Not and demonstrate proper capture Not Observable and containment of kitchen ❑ exhaust systems. ONot Applicable 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 13 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Mechanical Rough-In Plans Verified Field Verified Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.I D 6.5.7.2 Fume hoods exhaust systems ❑Complies [ME33]' >=15,000 cfm have VAV hood ODoes Not exhaust and supply systems, direct make-up air or heat ❑Not Observable recovery. ❑Not Applicable 6.5.8.1 Unenclosed spaces that are ❑Complies [ME34]2 heated use only radiant heat. DDoes Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5.9 Hot gas bypass limited to: <=240 ❑Complies [ME35]i kBtu/h-50%>240 kBtu/h-25% ❑Does Not [Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 6.5.9 Hot gas bypass limited to: <=240 ❑Complies [ME35]1 kBtu/h-50%>240 kBtu/h-25% ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable • ❑Not Applicable 7.4.2 Service water heating equipment ❑Complies [ME36]2 meets efficiency requirements. ❑Does Not O Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:'Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 14 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section # Rough-In Electrical Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 8.4.2 At least 50%of all 125 volt 15-and DComplies Requirement will be met. [EL10]2 20-Amp receptacles are controlled by ODoes Not an automatic control device. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.1 Automatic controls to shut off all DComplies [ELi]2 building lighting. ODoes Not [Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.2 Independent lighting controls installed ❑Complies [EL2]2 per approved lighting plans and all Does Not manual controls readily accessible and :Not Observable visible to occupants. ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.3 Parking garage lighting is equipped DComplies [EL11]2 with required lighting controls and ❑Does Not daylight transition zone lighting. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.4 Primary sidelighted areas>=250 ft2 DComplies [EL12]1 are equipped with required lighting ODoes Not controls. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.5 Enclosed spaces with daylight area DComplies [EL13]1 under skylights and rooftop monitors ODoes Not >900 ft2 are equipped with required lighting controls. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.7 Automatic lighting controls for exterior❑Complies [EL3]2 lighting installed. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.1.6 Separate lighting control devices for DComplies [EL4]1 specific uses installed per approved ODoes Not lighting plans. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.2 Exit signs do not exceed 5 watts per DComplies [EL6]1 face. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 9.4.3 Exterior grounds lighting over 100 W DComplies [EL7]1 provides>60 Im/W unless on motion ODoes Not sensor or fixture is exempt from scope ❑Not Observable of code or from external LPD. ❑Not Applicable 9.6.2 Additional interior lighting power DComplies [EL8]1 allowed for special functions per the ODoes Not approved lighting plans and is ❑Not Observable automatically controlled and separated from general lighting. ❑Not Applicable 10.4.1 Electric motors meet requirements DComplies [EL9]2 where applicable. ODoes Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 15 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 16 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Insulation Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 5.4.3.1 All sources of air leakage in the ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN1]' building thermal envelope are ODoes Not sealed,caulked,gasketed, Location on plans/spec: weather stripped or wrapped with ❑Not Observable Sht A003 moisture vapor-permeable ONot Applicable wrapping material to minimize air leakage. 5.5.3.1 Roof R-value.For some ceiling R- R- DComplies See the Envelope Assemblies [IN2]' systems,verification may need to ❑ Above deck ❑ Above deck ODoes Not table for values. occur during Framing Inspection. ❑ Metal ❑ Metal ONot Observable ❑ Attic ❑ Attic ONot Applicable 5.8.1.2,5. Roof insulation installed per DComplies Requirement will be met. 8.1.3 manufacturer's instructions. ODoes Not [IN3]' Blown or poured loose-fill Location on plans/spec: insulation is installed only where ONot Observable Sht.A003 the roof slope is<=3 in 12. ONot Applicable 5.5.3.2 Above-grade wall insulation R- R- R- DComplies See the Envelope Assemblies [IN6]' value. ❑ Mass ❑ Mass Oboes Not table for values. ❑ Metal ❑ Metal ❑Not Observable ❑ Steel ❑ Steel ,ONot Applicable ❑ Wood ❑ Wood 5.8.1.2 Above-grade wall insulation DComplies Requirement will be met. [IN7]' installed per manufacturer's DDoes Not instructions. Location on plans/spec: ONot Observable Sht.A003 ❑Not Applicable 5.5.3.4 Floor insulation R-value. R- R- DComplies See the Envelope Assemblies [INV ❑ Mass ❑ Mass ❑Does Not table for values. ❑ Steel ❑ Steel ['Not Observable ❑ Wood ❑ Wood ONot Applicable 5.8.1.1 Building envelope insulation is DComplies Requirement will be met. [IN10]z labeled with R-value or insulation ODoes Not certificate providing R-value and other relevant data. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 5.8.1.4 Eaves are baffled to deflect air to DComplies Requirement will be met. [IN11]2 above the insulation. ODoes Not • ❑Not Observable Location on plans/spec: 9/A800 ONot Applicable 5.8.1.5 Insulation is installed in ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN12]2 substantial contact with the ElDoes Not inside surface separating Location on plans/spec: conditioned space from ONot Observable A301-A304 unconditional space. ONot Applicable 5.8.1.6 Recessed equipment installed in DComplies Requirement will be met. [IN13]2 building envelope assemblies ODoes Not does not compress the adjacent ONot Observable insulation. ONot Applicable 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell_Energy Page 17 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section - # Insulation Inspection Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID Value Value 5.8.1.7 Exterior insulation is protected ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN14]2 from damage with a protective ODoes Not material.Verification for exposed Location on plans/spec: foundation insulation may need ❑Not Observable 'ShtA003 to occur during Foundation ❑Not Applicable Inspection. 5.8.1.7.1 Attics and mechanical rooms ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN1512 have insulation protected where ODoes Not adjacent to attic or equipment Location on plans/spec: access. ❑Not Observable A003 ❑Not Applicable • 5.8.1.7.2 Foundation vents do not interfere ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN16]2 with insulation. ODoes Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 5.8.1.8 Insulation intended to meet the ❑Complies Requirement will be met. [IN17]3 roof insulation requirements ❑Does Not cannot be installed on top of a Location on plans/spec: suspended ceiling. Mark this :Not Observable A303 requirement compliant if DNot Applicable insulation is installed accordingly. Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:Uobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01 Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 18 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section # Final Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 5.4.3.3 Weatherseals installed on all loading DComplies Exception: Requirement does not apply. [FI1]1 dock cargo doors in Climate Zones 4- ❑Does Not 8. Location on plans/spec: N/A ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.1.2 Thermostatic controls have a 5 °F DComplies [FI3]3 deadband. ❑Does Not ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.2 Temperature controls have setpoint DComplies [FI20]3 overlap restrictions. ❑Does Not :Not Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.3.1 HVAC systems equipped with at least DComplies [F121]3 one automatic shutdown control. ❑Does Not ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.3.2 Setback controls allow automatic DComplies [FI22]3 restart and temporary operation as Oboes Not required for maintenance. ❑Not Observable ONot Applicable 6.4.3.7 When humidification and DComplies [FI6]3 dehumidification are provided to a ODoes Not zone,simultaneous operation is ONot Observable prohibited. ❑Not Applicable 6.7.2.1 Furnished HVAC as-built drawings DComplies [FI7]3 submitted within 90 days of system ❑Does Not acceptance. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.7.2.2 Furnished O&M manuals for HVAC DComplies [F18]3 systems within 90 days of system ❑Does Not acceptance. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 6.7.2.3 An air and/or hydronic system DComplies [FI9]1 balancing report is provided for HVAC ❑Does Not systems serving zones>5,000 ft2 of ❑Not Observable conditioned area, ONot Applicable 6.7.2.4 HVAC control systems have been DComplies [Fi10]3 tested to ensure proper operation, Oboes Not calibration and adjustment of controls. ONot Observable ❑Not Applicable 7.4.4.3 Public lavatory faucet water DComplies [F111]3 temperature<=110°F. ❑Does Not ONot Observable ONot Applicable 8.7.1 Furnished as-built drawings for DComplies [F116]3 electric power systems within 30 days ❑Does Not of system acceptance. ONot Observable ONot Applicable 8.7.2 Furnished O&M instructions for '❑Complies [FI17]3 systems and equipment to the ❑Does Not building owner or designated ONot Observable representative. ONot Applicable 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 19 of 21 Code_Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Section # Final Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 9.2.2.3 Interior installed lamp and fixture ❑Complies See the Interior Lighting fixture schedule for values. [F11871 lighting power is consistent with what ❑Does Not is shown on the approved lighting ❑Not Observable plans,demonstrating proposed watts are less than or equal to allowed ❑Not Applicable watts. 9.4.3 Exterior lighting power is consistent ❑Complies See the Exterior Lighting fixture schedule for values. [F119]1 with what is shown on the approved ❑Does Not lighting plans,demonstrating ❑Not Observable proposed watts are less than or equal to allowed watts. ❑Not Applicable 10.4.3 Elevators are designed with the ❑Complies [F124]2 proper lighting,ventilation power,and ❑Does Not standby mode. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 7.4.3 First 8 ft of outlet piping is insulated ❑Complies [FI45]2 ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 20 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck Project Title: 4120 Lexingtonway Report date: 03/24/17 Data filename: K:\Jobs\4120 Lexington Way\4120-Expansion_15184\01_Admin\Code\4120_Shell Energy Page 21 of 21 Code Ashrea 2010-ALL.cck z o E CO a o o w 0 us WW z cy F' d g Z U z O Z an O O O W Z o. 3i OI E 0 ® d >> o ¢U¢ ¢ ¢ o vaN x ar 0 Z FL O ¢ N mw Z ? "- J Q } zLL UV U Z �z � F ill Z ®lI U N Zl. W mao tll n •° ® `o gcS 3 T.0 °°°••° rc •/� e C4 co a. 0 >PM LL- LI_ rte. 11114111616111 ' 0 1 W - U og CrG D '9 x 0 i T r - a. _ 1— - r ; Aga. ....•4 �S8i11 Fif! a ee �. F ¢ , 45 A El o x ). 1 0 AVM NOIOMXJ1 — 0 n --T— I I x "ti c Z W U' a CITY COPY Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name 4120 LEXINGTON WAY Project No. Location FAGAN. MN Permit No. Technical (2) Type of Specific Report Assigned Section Article Description (3) Inspector (4) Frequency (5) Firm (6) 1705.3 Concrete construction TA Table 1705.3 of 2012 IBC 1705.6 Soils TA Per soils Report of Geotechnical Ena. WOOD SHEAR WALLS TA IX Note: This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing" as contained in the State Building Code and modified by the state adopted IBC.) * A complete specification-ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at www.cecm.org* (1) Permit No. to be provided by the Building Official (2) Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program. (3) Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code. (4) Special Inspector - Technical (SIT); Special Inspector - Structural (SIS) (5) Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc. (6) Name of Firm contracted to perform services. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS / ( ch appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner.,..-,� C- Jam', Firm: fr C elv£. uL C.. Date: 3/17/Z'a n Contractor: .-�' Firm:.hi.ejt " Lori5+1e*" 1'v✓I Lt-C- Date: 3-17-2611 Architect: 9-- Firm: Mohagen Hansen Arch. Date: 3-17-2017 SER: W. (fast Firm: VOIGT AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: 3-8-2017 SI-S: Firm: Date: TA/S{-7- 9re Firm: /304.0A) /s ?J? 't cox/7 Date: 1-/ -Zo/'7- F: Firm: Date: If requested by engineer/architect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record SI-T = Special Inspector -Technical TA = Testing Agency SI-S = Special Inspector -Structural F = Fabricator Accepted for the Building Department By Date: BCSD-PRO19 4/03 CITY First Fiduciary Corporation 4120 Lexington Way Eagan, MN 55123-1512 Office: 651-452-1512 / Fax: 651-452-1525 Project Narrative: First Fiduciary Corporation is a Professional Fiduciary organization that serves in multiple roles (Many Appointed by the State Court System) acting as Guardian, Conservator, Trustee, Personal Representative for Estates, Attorney-in- Fact and other Fiduciary positions. We are engaged by individuals, banks, attorneys and family members to provide advice or assistance with financial and care management issues. We currently have approximate 300 active clients and generate revenue through fees for services. Our current Office Building holds approximately 24 employees. CITY COPY Change Directive ill 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Tel 952.426.7400 I I I I Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440 MOHAGEN HANSEN Wayzata,MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com Date: 3-17-2017 Project: 4120 Lexington Way Addition Project Number15184.ODNL Location: 4120 Lexington Way Eagan,MN 55123 Subject: Change Directive#1 This Change Directive constitutes an instruction to execute the proposed changes. This Change Directive consists of Modifications to Drawings as follows: Cover 1. Update Applicable Codes chard 2. State project will follow ASHREA 90.1 2010 for energy code. Sheet A003 3. Update Performance Specifications for compliance with Energy Code Sheet A004 4. Add Code Plan Sheet. Sheet A200 5. Remove references to any fire rated walls. Horizontal exit or other fire rated walls are not required. 6. Update dimensions to match Structural drawings. Sheet A301,A303 and A304 7. Change Insulation to comply with Energy Code Sheet A400 8. Add an ADA fold down bench to Shower changing area 9. Modify restroom tags to indicate Second Level MOHAGEN HANSEN Architecture I Interiors 400 City of Eaaali March 3rd 2017 Jaeger Construction 2317 Waters Drive Mendota Heights,MN 55120 Re: First Fiduciary Corporation(addition) 4120 Lexington Way Dear Mr.Jaeger; We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report and is limited to the plans that were supplied to the City of Eagan. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2015 Minnesota Building Code(MSBC)which has adopted, with amendments,the 2012 International Building Code as well as the 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code(MNAC). It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are,therefore,requesting that the following items be addressed: 1. The civil plans are not up to date as they state they are preliminary plans and show a stairway on the east side on the building which is not reflected on the architectural plans.Provide an accurate ready for construction civil plan set for review. 2. Provide energy compliance documentation. 3. Provide a statement of special inspections per MSBC section 1704.3. 4. The MN Fire Code should read 2015. 5. Label all of the walls for partition type. 6. Page A400 detail 7 indicates a lower level toilet and shower.I do not see a lower level on the plans. 7. The 2nd level shower will require a bench for changing in addition to the bench required in the shower itself. 8. Provide an emergency response site plan.An example of this can be found on our website. 9. Indicate exit signage on plans. 10. Provide an electronic plan set, submitted in PDF format, for the final review. Provide two sets of the above referenced plans to the building inspection department for further review. If you have any questions concerning this letter,please contact me at(651)675-5676 Monday through Friday 8:00 am to 4:30 pm or email me at mgrannesAcityofeagan.com. Sincerely, 1 4,11 City of EaQali Mike Grannes Senior Building Inspector Cc: Dale Schoeppner,Building Official fit"' • For Office Use (f � Permit* /54/go " ` •� �' Permit Fee: /3S-cam 6 E AG N Staff: ============= = = 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD I EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 C'e�E I�/ E Payment Recvd: Yes No (651)675-5675 I TDD:(651)454-8535 l FAX:(651)675-56 I Plans:`\f EI� Paper Plan Submittal:ealansacitvofeagan.com APR 1 7 2019 L 2019 COMMERCIAL BUIL ; IT APPLICATION Date: 4.17.19 Site Address: 4120 Lexington Way, Eagan 55123 Tenant Name: First Fiduciary (Tenant is: New/ Existing) Suite#: Former Tenant: Name: First Fiduciary Phone: 6514521512 Property Owner Address/city/zip: 4120 Lexington Way, Applicant is: ✓ Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: installing two tents in parking lot for event Construction Cost: Name: Apres Event Decor& Tent Rental License#: Contractor Address: 5801 Clearwater Dr city. Minnetonka 55343 Phone: 952.903.4246 State: MN Zip: Contact: Katiee Wandmacher Email: Kwandmacher@apresparty.com Name: Registration#: Architect/Engineer Address: city: State: Zip: Phone: Contact Person: Email: Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone#: NOTE:Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as nonpublic if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. You may subscribe to receive art electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.citvofeaaan.com/subscribe. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.aoaherstateonecall.orq I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. i\IGNNAA, GICAleA( fit'I\AkitA/1 • Applicant's Printed ame Ap•licant's ignature DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE / / S �/ C1 SUB TYPES — — � L T('0, -/-0/� W Foundation Public Facility Exterior Alteration-Apa ments Commercial/Industrial Accessory Building _ Exterior Alteration—Commercial Apartments 7 Greenhouse/Tent — Exterior Alteration—Public Facility Miscellaneous Antennae WORK TYPES New _ Interior Improvement Siding _ Demolish Building* Addition _ Exterior Improvement _ Reroof _ Demolish Interior Alteration _ Repair Windows _ Demolish Foundation Replace _ Water Damage Fire Repair _ Retaining Wall Salon Owner Change *Demolition of entire building—give PCA handout to applicant — DESCRIPTION ,, II Valuation 'Faxes ( Occupancy 4 MCES System N/. Plan Review il,/tt:D Code Edition 2of5 MU. SAC Units (25%_100%_) I hiiGL D Zoning City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump #of Units Square Feet PRV #of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction •B Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings_New Building_Deck_Addition Drain Tile Foundation Foundation Before Backfill Retaining Wall Vapor Barrier Erosion Control Framing 30 Minutes 1 Hour Steel Reinforcement Insulation Street/Curb Cut Inspection Sheetrock Other: Roof:_Decking _Insulation Ice&Water _Final Meter Size: Siding:_Stucco Lath _Stone Lath _Brick_EFIS Electronic Set of Final Revised Plans Windows Fireplace:_Rough In _Air Test _Final Final/C.O. Required Pool:_Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final ----V Final/No C.O. Required Final CIO Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: ✓Yes No Reviewed By: em/G '* , Planning New Business to Eagan: Reviewed By: Ci/'/6. , Building Inspector FEES Water Quality Base Fee /3S• 443 Storm Sewer Trunk Surcharge /N�6 Sewer Trunk • Plan Review /NCt.is Water Trunk MCES SAC Street Lateral City SAC Street S&W Permit&Surcharge Water Lateral Treatment Plant Stormwater Performance Security Treatment Plant(Irrigation) Landscape Security Park Dedication Other: Trail Dedication TOTAL: ' /3 S a.V Page 2 of 3