1415 Kingswood Ponds RdAddress 1415 KINGSWOOD PONDS ROAD Zlp $512 2
IAt 2 Blk I Sub KINGSWOOL" PONDS I ST
THESE 1TEMS WERE / WERE NOT COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL INSPECI'fON.
Date: ? _-7_ 1) J Yes No Inspector: _ ?.
Final grade (6" from siding)
Permanent steps (garage)
Petmanent steps (main entry)
Permanent driveway
Permanent gas
Sod/Seeded grass ?
TraiUcurb damage
Porch
Basement finish ?
Deck
Please verify with the builder the removal of toof test caps from the plumbing system and the shut-off of water supply to
the outside lawn faucet before freeze potential exisu.
Contact engineering division at 681-4645 before working in rightof-way or installing underground sprinkler system. ?
White - City Copy Yellow - Resident Copy Pink - Contractor Copy
- RESIDENTIAL BUILDItiG
Permit Application
City Of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Mn 55122
Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694
?? ? •?S
-LQ -03
New Construc6on Re4uirements RemodellReoair Reouirements Office Use Onlv
3 regislered site surveys showing sq. R of lot sq. ft o( house; and all roofed areas 2 copies of plan Cert of Survey Recd
(20% maximum lot coverage allowed) 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions Tree P2s Plan Recd
2 copies of plan showing beam 8 window sizes; poured tound design, elc. 1 site survey for addiGons & decks _ Tree Pres Not Reqd
1 set of Energy Calculations AddiGon - indicate Non-sde sepfic system _ On-site Septic System
3 copies of Tree Preservation Ptan if lot platted after 711193
Rim Joist Detail Options selec6on sheet (hldgs wiN 3 or less unils
?
Date 13 / 75
Construction Cost '4W
Site Address n%i14 5 40v:G/ f'0•'Y`S ?,/ UniUSte #
a--
Description of Work
Multi-Family Bidg _ Y? N Fireplace(s) _ 0 2
Property Owner Telephone #
l
'
`
Contractor
.7
/I
-'
Address 4cz4,,L_e - 2`5 GL./gQ(,ie City
State Zip Telephone # ( )
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
Energy Code Category
(q submission type`
Licensed Plumber
Mechanical Contr
Sewer/Water Con{,..,.,,,,
- Minnesota Rules 7670 Cate¢orv 1
• Residential VenGlation Category 1 Worksheet
Minnesota Rules 7672
. New Energy Code Worksheet
Submitted
Telephone # (
Telephone # (
Telephone # (
I hereby apply for a Residential Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate;
that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN
Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a
permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and
approval of plans.
?
1
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
OFFICE USE ONLY
Sub Types
? 01 Foundation
? 02 SF Dwelling
? 03 01 of _ plex
? 04 02-plex
? 05 03-plex
? 06 04-piex
Work Types
? 07 05-plex ? 13 16-plex
? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace
? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage
? 10 08-plex 3K 18 Deck
? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level
? 12 12-plex Plbg_Y or _ N
? 31 New
32 Addition
? 33 Alteration
? 34 Replacement Valuation
Census Code
SAC Units
Nbr. of Units
Nbr. of Bldgs
Type of Const ?
Footings (new bldg)
? Footings (deck)
_ Footings (addition)
Foundation
Drain Tile
Roof Ice & Water Final
_ Framing
_ Fireplace _ R.I. _ Air Test _ Final
Insularion
? 20 Pool
? 21 Porch (3-sea.)
? 22 PorchlAddn.(4-sea.)
? 23 Porch (screen/gazebo)
? 24 Storm Damage
? 25 Miscellaneous
e
? 30 Accessory Bidg
? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi
? 33 Ext. Alt - SF
? 36 Muiti Misc.
? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding
? 36 Move Bidg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair
? 37 Demolish (Bldg)* ? 43 Reroof ? 46 WindowslDoors
Temolition (Entire Bldg) - Give PCA handout to applicant
Occupancy MC/ES System
Zoning City Water
Stories Booster Pump
Sq. Ft. PRV
Length Fire Sprinklered
Width
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
FinallC.O.
? FinaUNo C.O.
_ Ptumbing
HVAC
Other
_ Pool _ Ftgs _ Air/Gas Tests _ Final
_ Siding Stucco Stone
_ Windows (new/replacement)
_ Retaining Wall
Approved By7 ?,- , Building Inspector
Base Fee
Surcharge
Plan Review -
MC/ES SAC
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Plant
License Search
Copies
Other
Totai
.L?7
?.
?? 20
?.A' F? ,.. ?_ ?..._. , .._..?... .___._._. _ ... . .. ...?__._._.__..._ _._
2422 Enterprise Drive
, .
Mmdofo Heights, MN 55120
(651) 881-1914 FAX:681-9488
?,;;. IONB@FI LAND SLMWyM . 01& a? E-moil: PIONEEROPRESSEN TER. COM
neer ne ? ?. LANDSCAM MC•XCTS
g 625 Highway 10 N.E.
* Bloine, MN 55434
t612) 783-1880 FAX: 783-1883
E-moil: PIONEER20PRESSENTER.COM
Certificate of Survey for: RELIABLE BUILDERS, INC.
/y/S KINGSWOOD PONDS ROAD
LOT AREA = 13,314 sq.ft.
HOUSE AREA = 2,089 sq.ft.
COVERAGE =16% I
COVERAGE =2 STORY •
R?c`i'vcG
3 ;EnOtinaO
30 ?
I I BENCH MARK EXISTING
TOP. OF PIPE ID USE
ELEV.=881.95 ae,.4 879.5 FE(4C? I
' ?cW? .,sas•os'oopw ? s7.oo (P,00, z?
aeas aei.i 35.85 28.33 aeo.o ?U??.S) xaeo.s
?--------- 10
?---- o ? f?
? 10 r---o 881.2
26.33 Ye79a -x.. e7e.2 ? ?a ?
w
Fi?? 0 aao.3 o a i ¢
? a W
(n zW
a? 2.00 o o
Z <N
w
• .
N ?/??
i?
M ? uwi
?/O? I ' N
o ? ? ?? ,o
O ?bo.oo - ?? ?
a J a92.0
s «O•2?
3 ?a., ? I
? , 1 % 28.33 ' ?aF,+ Z D , ? ? eai.o
N rio
Y? 1 col o .?; O6 • I
Ni ?
J 881.6 881.0
?1,p ?? ,P• 0 ? ?? o,'?o `'V'? ; ? .{:
\ 4m
s 5 56 _?
879.8 ? 883.0 z; . .
BENCH MARK
879.J \ TOP OF PIPE . " ? ?
EI.EV.=881.60 ;,!t?. 7'?e1te
EAGAN ENGINOM TtING DEPT. ?
,
?
•
NOTE: PROPOSm GRADES SHOWN PER CRADING PLAN BY: PARAMWNi PROPOSED HOUSE EL
LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION: EVATION
R,76,3
NOiE BUIIDINC UIMENSIONS 910WN ARE FOR MORIZOPIiAI AND VERIICAL LOCATION .
E
T
O 695,11
OF SiRUCiURES ONLY. ?E ARCMITECIUAL PLANS FOR BUILOMG AND VA
I
N:
TOP OF BLOCK EL
FWNOAl10N DIMEN90NS.
GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION:
NOIE: NO SPEqFlC SOIlS INVES11GAltOJ HAS BEEN COMPLEiED ON 1HIS LOi BY 7HE ??5
SURVEYOR. ME SUITABWTY OF SOILS TO SUPPORi iHE SPEqFlC HOUSE 8
T.O.B.0 LOOK OUT ELEVATION:
PROPOSED IS NOT 1HE RESPON5191LITY OF TFIE SURVEYOR.
NO7E: iH15 CERTIF7CATE DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS OTHER THAN X 000.00 DENOTES EXISi1NG ELEVAlION
TNOSE SHOWN ON 1HE RECORDEO PLAT. - ( 000.00 ) DENOTES PROPOSeD-EIEVATION- -----^ ----
NOTE: CONiRACTOR MIIST VERIFY DRIVEWAY DE9GN. --- DENOTES DRAINACE AND U11lJTY EASEMENT
DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
NOIE: BEAPoNGS SHOMN ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMm OAiUM • DENOTES MONUMENT -
- 6 DENOTES OFFSET HU8
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO RELIABLE.BUILDERS, INC. THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTAiION OF A
SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: .
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, KINGSWOOD PONOS 1ST ADDITION
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCHROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, AS SURVEYEO BY ME OR
UNOER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION THIS 28 DAY OF AUGUST, 2000.
SIG D: PIONEER GIN RING, P.A.
SCALE : 1 INCH = 30 FEET BY:
?71 100358.00 JMM John C. Larson, L.S. Reg. No. 19828
s
CITY OF EAGAN
CASHIER: JS TERMINAL NO: 781
DATE: 09/07/00 TIME: 15:02:46
ID:
NAME: RELIABLE BUILDERS, INC
3716 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD
3713 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD
3865 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD
114.00
50.00
840.00
Total Receipt Amount: 5,031.11
CR137149
USER ID: JAN
*****************?*********************
CITY OF EAGAN
CASHIER: JS , TERMINAL NO: 781
DATE: 09/07/00 TIME: 15:02:44
ID:
NAME: RELIABLE BUILDERS, INC
2252 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD 30.00
3210 9001 1415 KNWD PD RD 1,318.55
3866 9379 1415 KNWD PD RD 100.00
3422 9001 1415 KNWD PD RD 857.06
2275 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD 1,089.00
3446 9001 1415 KNWD PD RD 11.0C
2155 9001 1415 KNWD PD RD 0.50
3743 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD 50.OC
2155 9001 1415 KNWD PD RD 79.OC
3868 9220 1415 KNWD PD RD 492.OC
CR137149 ** CONTINti
USER ID: JAN ** CONTINi:
? ???_, .
? (RE?5IDENTIAL)
2000 BUILDING PE?IT APPLICATIONg
?2701
D 3 refllstered site wrveys showing sq. ft. of lof, aq. M. ot house 2 copies of plan
and gjj rooled areaa 12096 maxlmum tot eoveraae ollowed) 1 sei of energy calculatlons tor heated addlHau
? 2 coplea ol plana (ahow beam & window sizea; poured fnd. design; efc.) 1 sife wrvey for extedor addiflons 3 decks
> 1 set ol energy calculanons
a 3 coplee of hee preaervafion plai I( loi plolted affer 711/93
DATE: CONSTRUCTION COST: 1 ?v
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: /? ?? kfC-
STREETADDRESS: ? y?s f?rjssc,?//°'*R'1 lf??
CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT KNOB RD - 55122
851-681-4875
New Conshuction Reaulremenh Remodel/Reoalr Reauirements
LOT: ?? BLOCK: I_ SUBD./P.I.D. #:
? rf
d
?
PROPERTY
OWNER
CONTRACTOR
ARCHITECT/
EN6INEER
? /
Name: ? / ley ??1' Phone#: 6????SY
Last First
Street Address: 3 3 6
6?[K
Cify ? Ah State: vP:
Company: Phone #: 6 ?l l?a?'/l1`02
(area code) Sheet Address: ? ? y ? ? ?p?e / L• L1Cense # ?Z y/ Exp. ?? o
city 62?h stare: zip:
Company: Name:
Telephorre #: ( )
Streei Ad5lress: Regishaflon #:
City State: Zip:.
??o? ??eh I'? ? --t?-?--En??(??)
SeweAwater licensed plumber (if Installinu sewertwater?: P?ne ??? -
-?
I hereby acknowledge fhat I have read this appl?aNon, state that Ihe infortnaHon is cortect, and agree to comply wilh aU appllcable StatE
of Minnesota Staiutea and CNy of Eagan Ordinances.
Signature of Applicant: l ?- ;
OFFICE USE ONLY t.,? -- .r --.
- / ??1?
Certifcates of Survey Received V Yes _ No $EP 2000
Tree Preservatfion Plan Recelved _ Yes _ No ? Not Required li-2??._
?5031. 11
Cal(?
911100
OFFICE USE ONLY
BUILDING PERMIT SUBTYPES
? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex ? 13 16-plex ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Muki
J!? 02 SF Dwelling ? OS 06-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 33 Ext. Att - SF
? 03 01 oi _ GiaiC 7 09 07-plex ? 18 Deek • ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 36 Mum .
C3 04 02-plex O 10 08-ptex O 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage
? 05 03-plex ? 11 10-plex Pibg _Yor_ N ? 25 Misceilaneous
? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex O 20 Pool ? 30 Accessory Bldg.
WORK TYPE
0 31 New ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 43 Reroof
? 32 Addition ? 37 Demolish (Bldg)' 0 44 Siding
? 33 Alteration ? 38 Demolish (Interior) 0 45 Fire Repair
? 34 Repair ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 46 Windows/Doors
• Give PCA handout to applicant for demolition permit
GENERAL INFORMATION
SAC Code 0 1 # of Stories ? S4• ft•
No. of Units ? Length ? sq. ft.
No. of Buildings
T
L
7- Width 210P
ft
/I -2 Footprint sq. ft. D 0
Census Code
Const. (Actual) -
i .
Basement sq. ,ra
(Allowable) r?J Main level sq. ft. /l 2 MC/ES System
UBC Occupancy Al-eve sq. ft. ! [ 7?c City Water
Zoning sq. ft. g 3 z Booster Pump
PRV
Fire Sprinklered
MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTIONS
? Stucco/Ston e
APPROVALS
Planning Building UkA Engineering Variance
?
Permit Fee pO
Valuation: $ /s O ?O
Surcharge Q
?
Plan Review ?
7'r? IS = ?t ? °S
yakt ? = ?1 ??•?
License 6
MC/ES SAC
City SAC
Water Conn.
? ? id, JC'S16 = 6 5 0? -
Water Meter
Acct. Deposit
SNV Permit
a? [. ?3 ,?'?? ?o
1
S/W Surcharge //7?
Treatment PI.
Park Ded.
Trails Ded.
Other
Copies
Total: T 7 q, O, 0-
SAC Units
% SAC
.:.... ..?i:?uv. ........r.?w..?...?..s-ua1.. ... . ...>..... n?..:.i'r"i'C.Lw).w.?..:i.,.?.....n.r...
PIONEER
uio sunvewns • aHL EnaNmts 2422 Enterprise Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
(651) 681-1914 FAX: 681-9488
E-moil: PIONEEROPRESSEN TER. COM
ene neer ne LAND PLANNERg• LAItIDSCAPE AR««TEUrs 625 Highway 10 N.E.
Blaine, MN 55434
(612) 783-1880 FAX:783-1883
E-mail: PIONEER2@PRESSENTER.COM
Certificate of Survey for: RELIABLE BUILDERS, INC.
/y/S KINGSWOOD PONDS ROAO
LOT AREA = 13,314 sq.ft.
HOUSE AREA = 2,089 sq.ft.
COVERAGE =16%
COVERAGE =2 STORY
??.C
I I BENCH MARK EXISTING ?g `.. ?
30 TOP OF PIPE HOUSE
ELEV.=881.95 8e3.4 e79.5 F??
? (?,?o•?l ?`,,S89'05'00"W rl7.00 ?80•2)
8B1? 35.85 28.33 880.0 xaso.s
880.5
-?}-----fo -------- ta
o 881.2 Q ?
I
26.33 K 879.2 x 87e.2 (? J
? F_a
Q I co W
880.3 I s-_ 03 ?Dw ?
0 ? a?
Q do ? i M L' ?¢w W
ac``ii? ?
? LO I 88i.0 2.00 0? n ow ?
0? a ? L L ?k ?
a o/
(n o?,/
I• ?
o L ?? ? J ,o
- o .04 - 892.0
15
a ?`r ??4•Z)
I H? ?
880.4 ?
28.33 aai.o x8B/? f .?)
ao? ??r
Ztl ?, eai.s io ?i ?
YNp o 1 °;N ??6-
N1 1? 887.6 881.0
? • 0 0 ? ? i? 3p 513
? ? ? z ?4f `?61•21 ?'
It 883.0 NE
879.8
e?s .3 BENCH MARK
\ TOP OF PIPE
ELEV.=881.60
\ ?. EAizt?I'Z a;NCNa..Ti??'?ING DEI3`I`. '?.
? .53
\
PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATION
NOTE: PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN PER GRADING PLAN BY: PARAMOUN7 LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION: S7b, 3
NOTE: 6UILDINC DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION 6054
OF STRUCNRES ONLY. SEE ARCHITECiUAL PLANS FOR BUILDING ANO TOP OF BLOCK ELEVAl10N:
FOUNDATION OIMENSIONS. j}3'?? 7
GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION:
N07E: NO SPECIFlC SOILS INVESTIGAiION HAS BEEN COMPIETED ON THIS LOT BY 7HE
SURVEYOR. THE SUITABIt1TY OP SOILS TO SUPPORT iliE SPEGFlC HOUSE T,0.8.0 LOOK OUT ELEVATION:
PROPOSED IS NOT TFIE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE SURVEYOR.
NOTE: iH15 CERiIFICASE OOES N0T PUR°ORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS OTHER THAN X 000.00 OEN07ES EXIS7ING ELEVA110N
THOSE SHOWN ON THE RECORDEO PLAT. ( 000.00 ) DENOTES PROPOSEU ELfVA710N
DENOiES DRAINAGE ANO UTILITY EASEMENi
NOTE: CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ORIVEWAY DESIGN. - DEN07E5 URPJNAGE FLOW DIRECTION
NOTE: BEARINGS SHOYM! ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED OATUM ---a- DENOTES MONUMENT
$ DENOTES OFFSET HUB
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO RELIABLE BUILDERS, INC. 11-IAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A
SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF:
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, KINGSWOOD PONDS 1ST ADDITION
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCHROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, AS SURVEYEO BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION THIS 28 DAY OF AUGU_°T, 2000. ^
SCALE : 1 INCH = 30 FEEI
1
.
SIG??: PIONEER VGIN ING, P.A.
BY: ?
John C. Larson, L.S. Reg. No. 19828
a
s
LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
? PROPERTYLEGAL: /-oT Z ?LOGiC / ?r?v<Si,?1?oD nN.OS /'=T ADDzrzoN
h DATE OF SURVEY:
H
?
w
LATEST REVISION:
?
p DOCUMENT STANDARDS
0
? ? Registered Land Surveyor signature and company
?
/ ? • Building Permit Applicant
,d
U ? • Legal description
? • Address
m?
a ? • North arrow and scale
?
? ? • House type (rambler, walkout, splitw/o, splR entry, lookout, etcJ
?a o • Directional drainage aROws with slope/gredient %
ra??a ? • Proposed/ebsting sewer and water services 8 invert elevation
m? p ? • Street name
q?o
.? ?
? •
• Driveway
Lot Square Footage
o ? • Lot Coverage
ELEVATIONS
I Ew•stina
?
?
jo ? • Sewer service (or Proposed)
m'? ? • PropeRy corners
?' ? • Top of curb atthe driveway
?
/ • Elevations of any ebsting adjacent homes
_; o Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches
/ Proposed
C3 ? • Garage floor
?
q? ? ?
o •
• First floor
Lowest exposed elevation (walkout/window)
? ? • PropeAy corners
e? ? ? • Front and rear of home at the foundation
PONDING AREA (if apdicable)
? ? r • Easement line
? o ?
/ • NWL
e ? P • HWL
? o m// • Pond # designation
? ? n? • Emergency Overflow Elevation
? DIMENSIONS
? • Lot IinesBearings & dimensions
p ? o • Right-of-way and sUeet width (to back of curb)
? o ? • Proposed home dimensions induding any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc.
(i.e. all sffuctures requiring permanent footings)
/o ? •' Show all easements of record and any Cily utilitles within those easements
W ? /n
? m? ? •
• Setbacks of proposed sVucture and sideyard setbackadjacent existing sVudures
Retaining wall requirements, 'rf any '19
Reviewed:
- 4?
/ Date
hAareh 1999
CMIG/BLDGPRMf.FM
MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT
Minnesota Energy Code
MNcheck Software Version 3.0
Permit
Checked by/Date
COUNTY: Dakota
STATE: Minnesota
ZONE: 2
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
DATE: 8-28-2000
Single Family
DATE OF PLANS: 8/4/2000
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SCOTT HOLMES
WILKENS RESIDENCE
COMPLIANCE: PASSES
Required UA = 410
Your Home = 347
15.4% Better Than Code
CEILINGS
WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C.
WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C.
WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C.
WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C.
BSMT: Conc. 9.0' ht/8.5' bg/9.0'
BSMT: Conc. 3.5' ht/3.0' bg/3.5'
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above
DOORS
DOORS
Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door
Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value
1176 38.0 0.0
360 19.0 2.0
1000 19.0 2.0
1060 19.0 2.0
140 19.0 2.0
insul 882 11.0 0.0
insul 148 11.0 0.0
Grade 24 0.320
Grade 24 0.320
Grade 24 0.320
Grade 24 0.320
Grade 12 0.320
Grade 12 0.320
Grade 12 0.320
Grade 6 0.320
Grade 6 0.320
Grade 24 0.320
Grade 36 0.320
Grade 9 0.320
Grade 20 0.320
Grade 20 0.320
Grade 20 0.320
35 0.310
21 0.310
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is
consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations
submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been
designed to meet the requirements of the Minnesota Energy Code.
Builder/Designer Date
. • that insulation can be installed between the partition and exterior
sheathing after exterior sheathing is installed
- gaps between framing less than one-half inch are eliminated by securin
framing together or are insulated at the time of assembly
- all penetrations between conditioned and unconditioned spaces made
prior to framing inspection are sealed
INTERIOR AIR BARRIER
- all fire stops are air sealed
- pipes, ducts, wires, equipment and flues and chimneys through the inte
air barrier are sealed
- a sealed continuous interior air barrier is installed on the warm side
the building envelope at ceilings, walls, and floor rim joist areas*
- air barrier behind tub and shawer is sealed and protected
- recessed light fixtures are sealed
ENVELOPE INSULATION
- basement insulation R-5 minimum
- wind wash barrier on wall separating house and garage is sealed
- loose fill insulation is prevented from entering the eaves
- insulation on skylight shafts and walls exposed in attics is supported
on the unconditioned side
ATTIC INSULATION
- attic access panel insulated to R-38 for ceiling panel and R-19 for
wall panel
- attic card attached to framing near access opening
- notification of attic R-value and date of installation posted near
permit inspection card
This is a summary only. Other requirements may apply. See the Minnesota
Energy Code. Questions? Call the Department of Public Service Information
Center at 651-296-5175 or 1-800-657-3710.
Site address: ! J A` N4f 0 1 f Lot _ Block _ 5ubd.
On April 15, 2000 the Minnesota Energy Code, Category I Building Requirements for insulation protection, air`
tightness, and venfilation, was adopted. As a result, the City of Eagan is requiring thaf the following information be
submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
_ This structure: is constructed to meet minimum requirements of the Mn Energy Code, Chapter 7670
OR
_ This structure: will be constructed to meet more restrietive requirements of Chapters 7672 or 7674
APPLIANCE GAS ELEC MANUFACTURER MODEL BTU'S VENTING TYPE
Water Heater ? Vr
Furnace
Dryer
EXHAUST SYSTEM
LOCATION
TYPE
MODEL
CFM's UENTED
YES No
Kitchen kitchen `
Bathroom f s` o yva-11 70
Bathroom2
11 o
Bathroom3
Bathroom 4
Other /..1d 71 VENTING. ;
FIREPLACE S LOCATION GAS WQOD MANUFACTl1RER MODEL BTU'S DIRECT . ATMOS'
, ?
z{?.14 /( ?f loor,. ? 4 h4` :Ye-
?
MAKE-UPAIR MO L TYPE CFM's, `
}4" 1
I hereby acknowledge that the above infoxmation is correct and agree to comply with the Minnesot#,Energy Code and City of `Eagan
requirements.
Signature Date
t
Company Name
* This form is the responsibilityofthe General Contractor.
CITY USE ONLY
t BL ? RECEIPT#:
SUBD. RECEIPT DATE:
PERMIT #
2000 PLiJNBING PERMIT (RESIDENTIAL)
CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT PINOB RD
EAGAN, MN 55122
651-681-4675
Please compfete for: ? single famity dwellings
? townhomes and condos when permits are required for each unit
? backflow preventer for underground sprinkler system
FIXTURES
EACN #
TOTAL
Alterations to existing dwelling - minimum fee
Describe: $ 30.00
Bath tub ? 3.00 x = $
Floor drain 3.00 x = $
Gas piping outlet * minimum -1 3.00 x = $
Hot tublspa 3.00 x = $
Kitchen sink 3.00 x = $
Laundry tray 3.00 x = $
Lavatory 3.00 x = $
Septic System new/refur6ished " requires MPC lic. 75.00 X = $
Septic System abandonment 30.00 x = $
RPZ new instaliationlrepaidrebuild 30.00 x = $
Rou h opening 1.50 x = $
Shower 3.00 x = $
Underground sprinkler if dwelling is under construction 3.00 x = $
Undergroundsprinkler if existing dwelling 30.00 x = $
Water closet 3.00 x = $
Water heater ° 3.00 x = $
Water softener If dwelling under construction 5.00 x = $
Water softener if existing dwelling 30.00 X = $
Water turnaround 30.00 x $
State Surcharge .50 -> ----> ---> $ .50
Total --> --> ----> ----> $ 1
Reminder. Call for inspections of alterations, i,e. water heaters, water softeners, etc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- • •-----------
I here by acknowledge that I have read this appiicatlon, state that the information is corred, and agree W comply with all appticable City of Eagan ordinances.
It is the applicanYs responsibility to notify the property owner that the City of Eagan assumes no liability for any damages caused by the City during its
normal operational and maintenance activities to the facilities constructed under this permit wkhin City property/right-of-way/easement.
SITE ADDRESS:
OWNERNAME:: PX'i/A?k Gk, TELEPHONE#: 6L1 691'I90?
(AREA CODE)
INSTALLER NAME: AIOIA?I"Jah /' Lus, TELEPHONE #: )3 - &2 169
A??/ (AR CODE)
STREET ADDRESS: YC?i''/S ?? Y?l?
CITY: 4-)J)0) el STATE: ZIP: SaV3
d,?., /-0",43
SiGNATURE OF PERMITTEE
CITV ircF nnrr.v
, - - LOT z BL ?
SUBD. n S, 1 ond PERMIT #:
RECEIPT #:
432q o
RECEIPT DATE:
2000 MECHANICAL PERMIT (RESIDENTIAL)
CiTY OF E4fit4N
3$30 P[LOT KNOB RD
EI4fiRN 1NA 55122
f
Date: 651-681-4675
Complete this section onlv if you are installing HVAC in a single-family dwelling, townhome or condo under
construction and not owner/occupied.
• HVAC: 0-100 M B T U
ADDITIONAL 50 M BTU
• Gas outlets (minimum of one required @$3.00 ea J
State Surcharge
TOtal
$ 30.00
6.00
Zd O
.]V
? ?se-zl
Complete this section onlv if you are remodeling, adding to, or replacing an existing single-family dwelling,
townhome, or condo. Please indicate if it is a new item, alteration, or replacement.
_ New _ Replacement _ Other
_ Furnace _ Air conditioning
_ Air exchanger Other
Fee $ 30.00
State Surchazge .50
Total $ 30.50
Reminder: Call for final inspection.
SITE ADDRESS: lqi5 r tt/G
OWNER NAME:
INSTALLER NAME: 1,44 &'r4 L C-??Q r-?
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY
_ (?LO / ..!?D -
PHONE #: -
(AREA CODE)
PHONE #: f J7-- -
(AREA CODE)
??? • STATE: 1"I" ZIP: 5-5--t/ 2,0
R? i
1 W
Lv 1
`% ZOF?PERMITTEE
IGNA
L BL
SUBD.
APPROVED BY:
INSPECTOR
PERMIT#:
RECEIPT#:
RECEIPT DATE:
2000 MECHANICAL PERMIT (COMMEftCiAL)
CTfY OF ERGM
3$30 PILUT KNOB RD
EAfii4N, M1V 5518E
651-6$1-4675
Please complete for: all commercial/industrial buildings
multi-family buildings when separate permits are not required for each dwelling unit
DATE:
WORK TYPE: New construction Install U.G. Tank
_ Interior Improvement Remove U.G. Tank
_ Processed Piping
When installing/removing underground tank, call 651-681-4675 for inspeclion by fire mnrshal and
plumbing inspecton
Descriprion of work:
Fees: 1% of contract price OR $30.00 minimum fee, whichever is greater.
Underground tank removallinstallation = min;T.,um fee
Contract price: $ x 1%= $ (Base Fee)
State surcharge calculate at $.50 for each $1,000 Base Fee
TOTAL $
SITE ADDRESS:
OWNER NAME: PHONE #: -
(AREA CODE)
TENANT NAME (IMPRQ VEMENTS ONZ1):
WAS THERE A PREVIOUS TENANT IN THIS SPACE? Y N. NAME:
INSTALLER:
ADDRESS:
CITY:
CITY USE ONLY
PHONE #: -
(AREA CODE)
STATE:
ZIP:
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE
2005 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
City Of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122
Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694
$W,00
Cd??w 8/l. .d?
New Construclion Reouirements RemodeVReoair Reauirements Offiae l3se Qnla
3 registered site suNeys showing sq. fl. of lot, sq. k. of house; and all roofed areas v 2 wpies of plan Ced at SuNep Recd Y N
(2014 maximum bt coverage aliower) 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions Iree Ptes PI9n Re?ti Y I?
2 copies of plan showing beam & wfndow sizes; poured (ound design, etc. 1 site survey for additions & decks V? Pkes Rez?uired Y N
1 set of Energy Calculations Addition - ind'?cate if on-site septic system OF?-sitesSepli?Syslem <i N,
3 copies of Tree Preseroation Pian if lof platted afler 711193
Rim Joist Delail Options selection sheet (buildings wilh 3 or less units)
Date / 57 r Construction Cost ?4? • ot,
Site Address 4c?,,f Unit/Ste M.
Descriptionof Work t-'1 ti
Multi-Family Bldg ?i Y? N Fireplace(s) _ 0? 1 _ 2
Property Owner ( l i? l? ( Kl Telephone #( b S/ } 6,jp6
Contractor
Address 3 7 y 5n City ?
State Zip Telephone # (? ? )
cPI ?I? ?7 C
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
- Minnesota Rules 7670 Categorv 1 _ Miiutesota Rules 7672
Energy Code Category
Residential Ventilation Category 1 Worksheet • 1New`En -?Ct>de Worksheet
(J submission type) ? ?9Y '
Submitted ?ub?ilied
• Energy Envelope Calculations Su6mitted
VC1 ?l ? J
In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? ?oGy
_ Y _ N If yes, date and address of master pian: y
Licensed Plumber
Mechanical Contractor
Sewer/Water Contractor
Telephone # (
Telephone # (
Telephone #(
I hereby apply for a Residential Building Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate;
that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN
Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a
permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and
approval of plans.
_?T?. ?i.
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
OFFICE USE ONLY
Sub Types
? 01 Foundation 0 07 OS-plex ? 13 16-plex ? 20 Pool ? 30 Accessory Bldg
? 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi
? 03 01 of _ plex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF
? 04 02-plex ? 10 08-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screen/gazebo) ? 36 Multi Misc.
? OS 03-plex ? 11 10-plex qe'?1'9 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage
? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex Plbg,?or_ N ? 25 Miscellaneous
Work Types
? 31 New ? 35 int Improvement ? 38 Demolish Interior ? 44 Siding
? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Building ? 42 Demolish Foundation ? 45 Fire Repair
L?r' 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish Building` ? 43 Reroof ? 46 WindowslDoors
? 34 Replacement 'Demolkion (Entire Bidg) -Give PCA handoutto applicant
Valuation Occupancy MCES System
Plan Review 100% or 25%
Census Code Zoning City Water
SAC Units ? Stories Boosier Pump
# of Units ? Sq. Ft. PRV
?
# of Bldgs Length Fire Sprinklered
Type of Const Width
_ Footings (new bldg)
,
_ Footings (deck)
_ Footings (addition)
_ Foundalion
Drain Tile
Roof Ice & Water Final
? Framing
V" Fireplace /R.I. -%AirTest 'Final
Y Insulation
REQUIItED INSPECTIONS
FinaUC.O.
Y FinaUNo C.O.
a' Plumbing
?' HVAC
Other
_ Pool _ Ftgs _ Air/Gas Tests Final
_ Siding _ Stucco _ Stone _ Brick
_ Windows
_ Retaining Wall
Approved By: J7 e "-(` 8uilding Inspector
Base Fee
Surcharge
Plan Review
MC/ES SAC
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Plant
License Search
Copies
Other
Total
2005 RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, EAGAN MN 55122
651-675-5675
Please complete for modifications to existing residential dwellings.
oate // r /U / p5y
Site 5treet Address ? d /
Pd /?'Gf ??.
Unit #
9
Property Owner I Telephone # ( )
Contractor /'t`C /h /GL Ge-,b r1?-( Telephone # (re '7)
Address 3 t:::z zf-?, City State,*-A/ Zip d
The Applicant is: _ Owner --,Z-Contractor _ Other
Septic System _ New _ Refurbished Submit 2 sets of plans and MPC license Includes County fee
$ 100.00
Per as-built $ 10.00
Alterations to existing dwelling 6 $ 50.00
? Add plumbing fixtures. This fee includes putting in a water softener andlor water
heater at the same time. lf vou are installinp onlv a water softener and/or water
heater, do not complete this section. Move to the
a
liance(s)
i
t
lli next section and check th'e
pp
you are
ns
a
ng. -.
?J
?
Septic 5ystem Abandonment
" r
_Water Turnaround (add $125.00 if a 5/8
meter is required)
_Other:
EWater Softener Water Heater $ 51 00
_ new _ replacement
Lawn Irrigation _RPZ _PVB _new _repair _rebuild $ 30.00
State Surcharge $ .50
Total $..?0C)
I hereby apply for a Residential Plumbing Permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the
work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the plumbing codes; that I
understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, work is not to start without a permit and work will be in
accordance with the approved plan in the event a plan is required to be reviewed and approved.
RA WI?? ?L,"/ 7?-e-o,_ -
Applicant's Print d Name ApplicanY ignature
6'
`7 9 ??,
2007RESIDENTIAL BUILDING rFRwarrucuim
City Of Eagan
3830 Pitot Knob Road, Eagan MN 55122
Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694
New ConsWc6on Reauirements
3 registered site surveys showing sq. R. of lot, sq. ft. of house; and all roofed areas
(200/o mauimum lot coverage allowed)
1 Soils Report if proposed 6uilding is to be placed on disturbed soil
2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, etc.
1 setof Energy Calcula5ons
3 copies of Tree Preserva6on Plan if lot platted aker 711193
Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (buildings with 3 or less units)
Minnegasco mecnartipl ventilation form
RemaleURepair Requirements
2 copies of plan showing footings, beams, joisfs
1 set oi Energy Calculations (or heated addifions
1 site surveytoradditions 8 decks
Add'dion - indicate N on-site septic system
1?10 - ?
Office Use Onlv
Ced of SurvQy Recd _Y ? N
Soils Reporf _Y _ N
Tree Pres Alan ReaJ Y, N.
Tree Pres Requiretl Y, N
On-site Sep6c System _ Y? N
Plans are considered ubiic information unless ou state the are trade secret and the reason.
/
Date
Site Address r• ? cu
Construction Cost
Unit/Ste #
l?
Description of Work J S"?--
Multi-Family Bldg _ Y ?? N Fireplace(s) J\ 0 _ 1 _ 2
Property Owner T' n Telephone # ( )
Contractor ?? -? L ?D Q? `"? L-''r j??? l?'v
Address ?l/
State 1??A 2/7-0City
Zip 5y9?-t ? Telephone # (5v7) 7a q- y3
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
Energy Code Category - Minnesota Rules 7670 Cateeorv 1 _ Minnesota Rules 7672
(J submission type) • Residential Ventilatlon Category 1 Worksheet • New Energy Code Worksheet
Submitted Submitted
• Energy Envelope.Galculations Submitted
In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan?
_ Y _ N If yes, date and address o# master plan;
Licensed Plumber
Mechanical Contractor
Sewer/Water Contractor
Telephone # (
Telephone # (
Telephone #(
I hereby apply for a Residential. Building Permit and aclrnowledge that the information is complete and accurate;
that the wark will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and the State of MN
Statutes; I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a
permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and
approval of plans.
,- -L._ c(D
Applicant's Printed Name App icant's Signature
DO NOT WRITE SELOW THIS LINE
Sub Types
? 01 Foundation ? 07 05-p{ex ? 13 16-plex ? 20 Poof ? 30 AccessoryBfdg
? 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi
? 03 01 of _ piex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF
? 04 02-plex ? 10 OS-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (scseen/gazebo/pergola) ? 36 Multi Misc.
? 05 03-plex ? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage
? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex ? 25 Miscellaneous
Work Tvnes
? 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish Interior ? 44 Siding
? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Building ? 42 Demolish Foundation ? 45 Fire Repair
? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish Building* ? 43 Reroof O 46 Windows/Doors
? 34 Replacement 'Demolition (Entire Bldg) - Give PCA handout to applicant
DBSCflptl017: Water Damage _ Yes
Valuation Occupancy MCES System
Plan Review 100% or 25% Code Edition
Census Code Zoning City Water
SAC Units Stories Booster Pump
# of Units Sq. Ft. PRV
# of Bldgs Length Fire Sprinklered
Type of Const Width
_ Footings (new bldg)
_ Footings(deck)
_ Footings (addition)
Foundarion
Drain Tile
Roof Ice & Water Final
Fraaung
_ Fireplace _ R.I. _ Air Test _ Final
Insulation
Approved By:
Base Fee
Surcharge
P{an Review
MC/ES SAC
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Piant
License Search
Copies
Other
Total
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
_ Sheefrock
FinaUC.O.
FinaUNo C.O.
HVAC
Other
Pool Ftgs Air/Gas Tests Final
_ Siding _ Stucco Lat1, _ Stone Lath _Brick
_ Windows
_ Retaining Wall
Building Inspector
,
AMM6
C'TPF'City of Eapn
Mike Maguire
MAYOR
Paul 8akken
Peggy Carlson
Cyndee Fields
Meg Tilley
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Thomas Hedges
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
MUWICIPAL CENTER
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1810
651.675.5000 phone
651.675.5012fax
651.454.8535 TDD
MAINTENANCE FACILITY
3501 Coachman Point
Eagan, MN 55122
651.675.5300 phone
651.675.5360 fax
651.454.8535 TDD
www.cityofeagan.com
THE LONE OAK TREE
The symboi of
strength and growth
in our community.
October 19, 2007
Tim Wilkin
1415 Kingswood Pond Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Tim:
I received your recent email regarding request for a response to budget questions
relative to the DCC. I sent a follow-up email October 15 and have not had any
response and, as a result, I was concerned that maybe we are not reaching the correct
email address.
I am forwarding a hard copy of this to your address to make certain that you have the
information you requested. There are a number of findings that our DCC Board has
made regarding the consolidation of the DCC and how we are viewing the future. I
would be happy to arrange for a meeting with Kent Therkelsen, DCC Executive
Director, to review any of the budget in further detail if you so desire.
Tim, have a great day and look forward to hearing from you.
Sin ly,
f3?
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
Enclosure
Cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Administrative Services
mlo
7
M
cn
Page 1 of 2
Tom Hedges
From: Tom Hedges
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 8:24 AM
To: 'tim@wilkinusa.com'
Cc: Gene VanOverbeke
Subject: FW: Preliminary 2008 Budget Questions
Attachments: Preliminary 2008 Budget Memo-August 2007.pdf
Tim
I have been out of town attending my national ICMA conference so needless to say I am catching up on e mails this
morning. I did ask Gene to respond to your information request and e maiis were sent on Thursday September 27 which
apparently you did not receive. We must have copied and sent the information to the wrong e mail address which for
what ever reason did not bounce back to us.
Sorry for the confusion!
Call if you have any questions!
Tom Hedges
City Administrator
From: Gene VanOverbeke
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:11 PM
To: Tim@timwilimk.com'
Cc: Tom Hedges
Subjett: Preliminary 2008 Budget Questions
Tim,
In answering your questions, I thought it would be most efficient and helpfui to provide you the attached copy of the
August 10 budget memo that went to the City Council and to reference the questions and answers to specific pages.
believe the information included in the newspaper article comes from this memo.
The City's payable 2007 operating levy was proposed to increase by 5.0% from $22,304,562 to $23,417,148. The use of
the levy for each year is shown in the tables on the bottom of page 9 and top of page 10 in the attached material. The
2007 table shows that the estimated market value homestead credit ($950,100) was indeed levied and the 2008 table
demonstrates the inclusion of that levy in the 2008 proposed levy. The 2008 table also demonstrates the additional
$1,000,000 being levied for streeUoverpass construction and $319,623 additional being levied for the renewal and
replacement of other infrastructure.
The information on page 17 shows the breakdown for the overall General Fund increase of 4.87% with 4.08% of the
increase presented on a consistent basis, 2007 to 2008. The .79% demonstrates the increase resulting from the
incorporation of extraordinary items into the 2408 budget.
The budgeting for the City's DCC operational obligation is as follows:
The total operational obligation for 2007 is $908,345 with $54,765 defined as start-up and paid for through use of
the fund balance. The remainder of $853,580 was budgeted through the Police Department and financed with
current revenues.
The total operational obligation for 2008 is $941,747 with $86,575 defined as start-up and $855,172 as an on
going base number. The total amount of $941,747 is budgeted from current revenues in the proposed 2008
budget. Consequently, the $86,600 was presented on page 17 as being different than 2007.
In addition to these operationai DCC obligations, Eagan is also obligated for its share of the bonds that were sold to
10/19/2007
Page 2 of 2
finance DCC capital, which are being repaid over the period 2008 through 2014. Eagan's share is a principal amount of
$1,315,000. The budget contemplates that the 2007 payable MVHC levy estimated to be $950,100 will be applied to this
obligation, thereby avoiding future tax levies for the debt.
I'm not sure the answers are quite as straight fonvard as I would like, but please call if you have additional questions or if I
missed anything. Tom and I would also be available to sit down with you to go over any of this information, if you think
thatwould be helpful.
As always, thank you for your interest in the City's operations
Thanks,
Gene
Director of Administrative Services
Phone: 651-675-5016
Fax: 651-675-5012
qvanoverbe?ke@cityQfeagan.com
10/19/2007
City Of Eaian M2m0
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 10, 2007
SUBJECT: PAYABLE 2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY, PRELiMfNARY
GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET AND BUDGET
INFORMATION
Introduction/Highl ig hts
This proposed budget presents the City Council with an opportunity to continue providing
the current level of services. It also provides an opportunity to enhance funding for the
Major Street Fund (dedicated to the new "Overpasses and Interchanges" account) and
to the General Facilities Renewai & Replacement Fund. The following highlights
explained in more detail in fhe complete narrative provide a summary of relevant facts:
? After providing for a.8°/a inflationary increase in the market value of the average
valued house in Eagan as determined by the County Assessor (increasing from
$278,920 to $281,208), there is a 3.0% increase in overall City taxes for payable
2008 (increasing from $709 to $730) on that sample property.
? The estimated City tax capacity rate for payable 2008 is currently 2.4% higher
than the final payable 2007 rate.
? The estimated market value rate for payable 2008 is 3.1 % lower than the final
payable 2007 rate (applies only to the debt service for the Community Centet).
? The payable 2008 tax levy for operations ineluded in the proposed budget is
increased by 5.0% from the payable 2007 levy. The combined levy including the
levy for the Community Center Debt Service is increased by 4.7% from the
payable 2007 total levy.
? As is always the case, and especially with a$26 million budget, there are
significant fluctuations in required appropriations and/or revenue estimates from
year to year that cause anomalies in percentage calculations in certain areas, in
certain departmenfal budgets or even in the total budget. For example, the 2008
budget includes the continuing extraordinary fuel costs, the biannual election
' costs, the incorporation of 2008 DCC start up costs and the on-going CJIIN
costs. The percentage fluctuations are even more dramatic in smaNer
departments with lower expenditure bases.
? In an "appies to apples" comparison the proposed 2008 budget is increased by
4.08% over the approved 2007 budget. Due to the combination of the above-
mentioned anomalies along with numerous other modifications, the overali
summary shows an increase for 2008 of 4.87%. Again, due to the various
anomalies and modifications individual department changes vary from an
increase of 36.8% (City Glerk with election costs and a smaii base) to an
increase of 1.4% (Planning). While remaining sensitive to these variations, staff
has attempted to frame the basic public policy matters for consideration at the
more macro policy level throughout the narrative and throughout the entire
budget.
? Budgets and taxes typically create challenges for staff and elected officials alike
and ihis budget is no different; however, this proposed budget builds an past
successes, maintains the desired level of services, and allows for reasonable
options for today and into the future.
t o^io
9%
g%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
l%
0°10
s%
ai
zv
o ro
-z r
-a %
-s^ro
-a i
3.3%
3.2%
9.3°/a
2.1%
IPD General Tax Levy Market Value Net Property
(Inflation) Fund Budget of Property Tax Capacity
Impact on Average Homeowner
Zoo? vS. Zoos
N 2007
02008
3
7ax Capacity Avg Home MV Tax on Avg
Rate Home
Meeting Purpose
The City is required to certify a proposed payable 2008 property tax levy to the County
Treasurer-Auditor on or before September 15, 2007.
The primary purpose of the August 14 Special City Council meeting is to review the
proposed property tax levy, the preliminary 2008 General Fund operating budget, and to
provide direction to staff. Any modifications to the proposed levy as directed by the City
Council will then be made in preparation for the September 4 regular City Council
meeting, at which iime the preliminary levy can be adopted in ofricial action. The
required material will then be forwarded to the County in time to comply with the
September 15 deadline. Modiflcations to the preliminary 2008 budget as directed by the
City Council can continue beyond that date in preparafion for the TnT hearing to be
scheduled for a date in November/December and before final budget approval.
In a subsequent section of this memo, possible dates far the City's TnT hearing are
delineated for City Council consideration. It has been the City's practice to hold the TnT
hearing in late November or eariy December, followed by a second meeting in
December to adopt the budget. The TnT hearing and the adoption of the budget are
required to take place at separate meetings.
The final property tax levy that is due at the County no later than December 28, 2007
can be decreased but cannot be increased from the preliminary certification. To the
extent that it does not require an increase to the overall tax levy, the budget can be
changed at any time throughout the process.
Background
In early April, staff began the 2008 budget process with Department Directors proposals
due to the City Administrator on June 22, 2007. The City Administrator and budget team
have met with Directors in preparing the City Administrator's recommended budget that
is now being presented for consideratian by the City Council. This budget cycle is
incorporating the beginning steps of a process of enhancing the budget to become a
better and more comprehensive planning, policy, and communications tool. The desired
enhancements are consistent with recommendations of the Government Finance
Officers Association and are generally accepted by practitioners and governments as
appropriate objectives. While the old budget process and book have served the City
we?I for years, it is important to take the document to the next level.
When reviewing individual department budgets please note that staff has continued to
refine the PerEormance Indicators and the Work Pfans for this budget draft. They are
currently included in each department budget, and will be refined and improved upon for
the published budget and in future years.
Even though there was no financial assistance provided, since the State Legislature has
completed its work, some of the uncertainty associated with previous year's budgeting is
eliminated for at least this one cycle. For the last couple of years the hudget has been
prepared without the benefit of knowing whether the State would provide funding of the
MVHC and whether or not formal levy limits or any other types of limitations on local
control would be implemented. This budget incorporates the expectation that the State
will pay the MVHC to the City per current statute and the City's levy has been allocated
accordingly. The proposed budget makes no provision for any potential changes that
might resuit from a Special Session, if one is called.
As a starting point and consistent with past practice, Directors were instructed to prepare
budgets that maintained a constant level of services and to provided a detailed
explanation for anything that exceeded 3°fa. Depending or? impaets remaining from
previous budgets, other service delivery challenges, and unique circumstances within
departments, the 3% parameter is clearly not realistic in all departments. The City
Administrator's recommended budget has again been prepared keeping in mind the City
Council's continuing financial goal including the objectives to:
? Streamline City operations and staffing to reduce City costs and improve
efficiencies and output.
? Research the impacts of the possible reduction in non-essential services
currently provided within the City's annual budget.
The following general observations again help provide background ta implementation of
these goals and to this budget preparation cycle and its unique challenges:
? The City of Eagan has historically been a relatively low service delivery City
committed to limited government.
? Numerous services that other communities are evaluating and considering
eliminating as part of limiting the role of local govemment are not provided in
Eagan.
? During Eagan's years of rapid growth, the allocation of limited resoucces was
balanced between providing services to the development community and to
current residents and new residents moving into the City. .
D At the same time, the commitment to low property taxes and an aggressive
approach to user fees was continued and strengthened.
D The combination of rapid development, gradual provision of desired, albeit
limited, services and relatively low property taxes forced a healthy emphasis on
creating efficiencies, a wise and limited selection of services and low
cost/effcient service delivery.
? The process also drove limited resources to higher priority, essential services
and at the same time limited development of non-essential services.
? Sound operational budget management by the City Councils and staff
consistently helped to generate efficiencies through the delivery of expected
services resulting in very high citizen satisfaction in the City.
Citizen OpinionslCorrtinuing Reform
The proposed 2008 budget provides for a continuation of services at a level that has
been satisfactory to the citizens of Eagan. This preliminary budget continues to be
responsive to today's circumstances while providing for the highest priority, desired
services in the most cost efficient manner possible. City staff continues to work to
deliver a balanced budget that provides the services that citizens desire and are willing
to pay for at the lowest possible cost, financed by revenues, including property taxes that
are fairly collected and consistently allocated to the highest priority services.
Given the size and complexity of the General Fund Budget, ihe inter-relationships with
other funds, and diverse perspectives about services, costs, and program value, it can
become an overwhelming task to formulate an appropriate and efficient budgeting
process much less to formulate the budget itself. The logical and foundational questions
in budgeting are "what do we do, how much does it cost to do it, and are the results
worthwhile?" According to the 2005 community-wide survey, citizens find great value in
the services Eagan provides as demonstrated in the following results:
? A"comparatively high" 83°la of residents polled rate the value of City services as
excellent or good. This is up 6 percentage points ftom the 2002 City Survey.
? A very large 84% rated City services in Eagan as excellent or good in
comparison to their previous city of residence. 7he mean positive rating for all
City services is 87.3%, well within the top five ranked communities in the
Metropolitan area.
? 56% rated their City taxes as about average or somewhat low. Only 4% said
they were very high.
? Of 11 City services rated (from police protection to snow plowing and park
maintenance) every service was rated excellent or good by 4 or more of every 5
residents who had opinions and was rated higher than our neighboring cities.
? 95% rate their quality of life as excellent or good.
? Nearly 1 out of 4 residents polled could not think of a serious issue facing the
City. Of the issues raised, only 3(growth, traffic, and airplane noise) garnered
double-digit responses (19%, 14%, and 13°!o respectively.)
? By a 20-point margin (54% to 34%) residents favored an increase in City property
taxes in order to maintain City services at their current level. Even among those
who opposed a tax hike, nearly 30% could not name any portion of the budget
they would cut.
D Of the citizens who have had interaction with City staff, 79% rate City staff
positively, placing Eagan within the top dec'ile of suburban communities. The job
approval rating of staff is up 19% from 2002 and among the highest in the metro.
? 7he approval rating for the City Council has increased 22% since the 2002 study.
The almost 10 to 1 approval rating of the City Council is at the top of the
Metropolitan area suburbs.
While rated highly in the past by its residents, the City of Eagan in this survey now ranks
among the top four cities in terms of citizen satisfaction - together with Minnetonka,
Woodbury, and 5horeview. In general, Eagan compares very favorably-meaning a
higher percentage of approval-to our neighboring cities and to Dakota County in ratings
for Quality of Life and in the willingness to consider tax increases, if necessary, to
maintain the current level of services. The survey data is now somewhat dated, but
there has been no indication from the public that satisfaction has changed.
Independent analysis also ranks Eagan highly:
? Not only did the Met Council find Eagan to be the number one job producer in the
Twin Cities in its most recent study from 2000-2004, but MONEY magazine July
2006 named Eagan to be among the top 12 best plaees in America to live.
? Starting with cities with 50,000 or more population, the magazine conducted
months of research on everything from incomes to taxes, parks to transportation,
with the goal of identifying those "small livable cities that had the best possible
blend of good jobs, low crime, quality schools,,plenty of open space, rational
home prices and lots to do."
? Eagan was found to have higher than average median househoid incomes and
education and more miles of walking trails than even the #1 city selected (Fort
Collins, CO). These best places "offer a quality of life that is hard to find," and
the people who live there, said MONEY magazine, "couldn't agree more."
Given this citizen survey information and the various options, the City Council through
the public policy process is able to decide fhe appropriate reforms and/or changes by
enhancing revenues, modifying service delivery or implementing some combination of
the choices. In continuing challenging economic times such as today's the budget
question obviously becomes even more important and responses more challenging than
ever.
The City Administrator has prepared this document as a preliminary 2008 General Fund
Budget incorporating City Council direction, as referenced in the individual department
narretives. The preliminary budget is a starting point for City Council consideration and
is not presented as a finished product. Importantly, it is balanced and will continue to
provide changes to operations in the spirit of reform as well as a continuation of services
expected and rated highly by the citizens. It allows for a reasonable continuation of
services in 2008 and maintains options for future years. The budget includes additional
funds for transportation obligations and for funding the City's renewai and repfacement
of general infrastructure. To that end, also included in this budget narrative is
information that will allow the City Council to make changes and adjustments to the
preliminary budget through the deliberafive process.
Benchmarks
While it is not always complete information and must be used carefully, it can be helpful
to show comparisons with similar cities to provide benchmarks on efficiency and
productivity. The fol)owing attachments may also be useful in making comparisons and
in helping to understand Eagan's financial position and budgeting options:
• Enclosed on page 21 is a copy of the recently released State Auditor's Report for
2005 expenditures showing Eagan's per capita spending lowest, relative to other
cities with 50,000 or more residents.
• Enclosed on page 22 is a copy of local payable 2007 property taxes of selected
other metro cities as well as a number of Dakofa County cities. Eagan has
significantly lower local property taxes than average in the metro area and the
lowest loca{ property taxes compared to any of our neighboring cities.
City Market Value and Tax Capacity
Based on the preliminary information received from Dakota County the City will see an
increase in overall rriarket value of 3.2% from $7,620,301,700 for payable 2007 to
$7,863,813,100 for payable 2008. The moderation in property tax value increases
7
makes this a much lower increase than it has been for the last few years. The City will
also see a net tax capacity increase of 2.1 % from $81,417,624 to $83,120,160. The net
tax capacity calculation is affected by the fiscal disparities contribution and the tax
increment tax capacity being factored into the base tax capacity. This information is
demonstrated in the following table.
Final Preliminary
Market Value
COMPARISON OF MARKET VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY
2007 2008
$ 7,620,301,700 $ 7,863,813,100
Tax Capacity
Fiscal Disparities
Tax Increment Value
Change
Amount Per Cent
$ 243,511,400 3.2%
$ 93,144,662 $ 96,712,280 $ 3,567,618 3.8%
(10,735,570) (12,332,367) (1,596,797) 14.9%
(991,468) (1,259,753) (268,285) 27.1%
Net Local Tax Cap $ 81,417,624 $ 83,120,160 $ 1,702,536 2.1%
Of the increase in overall market value, approximately 41 %, or $99,879,200 (compared
to 19% for payable 2007) results from new construction. The balance is generated
through inflation, which again demonstrates the moderation of value increases on
existing property resulting from lower inflation on existing properties.
Tax Capacity Property Tax Levy
The City is not receiving any Local Government Aid in 2007 and that will not change for
2008 per the recent State certification. State Statutes sunset levy limits for taxes
payable in 2005 so there is no State mandated property tax levy limit on the Ciry to be
considered in this budget.
The property tax component of the City's proposed certified levy for operations included
in the proposed budget is $23,417,149 for payabie 2008 compared to $22,304,562 for
payable 2007. This information is demonstrated in the foliowing table:
COMPARISON OF TAX LEVY FOR OPERATIONS & TAX CAPACITY RATES
Final Proposed Change
2007 2008 Amount Per Cent
Operating Levy $ 22,304,562 $ 23,417,149 $ 1,112,587 5.0%
F D Distrlb (1,761,247) (1,938,900) (177,653) 10.1%
Net Local Levy $ 20,543,315 $ 21,478,249 $ 934,934 4.6%
Tax Cap Rate-City: $ 20,543,315 $ 21,478,249
$ 81,417,624 $ 83,120,160
0.25232 0,25840 0.00608 2.4%
2007 U se of Levy
g;
??;;o? 2008 Use of Levy
,
,
y1
2 M Major Streat
. . ConsWCUon
Markel Vdue . $2.3 M
. 4 ? HomesleaA
Cretlll
;1.0 M
Equipment
?
9 - Revolving
General Wn0
$19.1 M Equfpment
Revdving Fund
?neral Fund FUntl
$1.0 M
$0.9 M $19.7 M
Ganeral
Generai Facllflies R&R
Facili6es R & R $0.$ M
$0.1 M
Tax related resources available to the City to appropriate in ihe budgets to provide
services are $22,304,562 and $23,417,148 ($22,542,148 taxes and $875,000 MVHC) for
the years 2007 and 2008 respectively. The property tax resources for the finro years are
allocated as follows:
Final Allocation of 2007 Property Tax Levy
Total 2007
Property Budgeted As
Tax Levy MVHC Taxes
General Fund $ 19,067,200 $ 812,199 $ 18,255,001
General Facilities R& R 134,010 5,708 128,302
Equipment Revolving Fund 905,440 38,569 866,871
Major St Const Fund 1,247,812 53,153 1,194,659
Mkt Velue Homestead Credit 950,100 40,471 909,629
Totals $ 22,304,562 $ 950,700 $ 21,354,462
The proposed 2008 payable levies for the General Facilities Renewal and Replacement
Furid, the Equipment Revolving Fund, and the Major Street Construction Fund are all
first increased by 5.0% over the actua12007 payable levies, while the Generai Fund levy
9
is increasing by 3.3%. The Major Street Fund Levy is then increased by $1,000,000 and
the General Facilities Renewal & Replacement Fund in increased by $319,623, both to
provide for maintaining the City's infrastructure. The proposed levy allocation assumes
the State will pay MVHC in 2008 per existing law, consequently there is no replacement
levy included as a funding source in the 2008 budget.
Preliminary Ailocation of 2008 Property Tax Levy
Preliminary Budgeted As
Property MVHC Preliminary
Tax Levy 2008 Prelim Taxes
General Fund $ 19,695,900 ' $ 735,953 $ 18,959,947
General Facilities R& R 140,711 5,258 135,453
" 319,623 11,943 307,680
Equipment Reyolving Fund 950,712 35,524 915,188
Major St Const Fund 1,310,203 48,957 1,261,246
" 1,000,000 37,366 962,634
Totals $ 23,417,148 $ 875,000 $ 22,542,148
* 3.3% increase.
5.0% increase.
"*` Additional levy dollars.
Market Value Property Tax Levy (Community Center Debt Service)
The City's proposed.certified levy for debt service based on referendum market value is
$1,199,363 for payable 2008 compared to $1,198,523.for payable 2007. That is an
increase of $840 or 0.1% from payable 2007 to payable 2008. The resutting market
value referendum rate is reduced by 3.1 % from 0.0001574 to 0.0001525 due to an
increase in the referendum market value.
COMPARISON OF LEVY FOR DEBT SERVICE & MARKET VALUE REFERENDUM RATES
Final Preliminary Change
2007 2008 Amount Per Cent
Ref Mkt Value $ 7,618,900,600 $ 7,862,302,100 $ 243,401,500 3.2°h
Debt Service Levy $ 1,198,523 $ 1,199,363 $ 840 0.1%
Mkt Value Ref Rate 0.0001574 0.0001525 (0.0000049) -3.1%
The following table illustrates the impact of the market value referendum debt service
levy (Eagan Community Center) for average value property for payable 2007 and 2008:
10
Average Annual
Payable Market Rate Tax
Year Value Per $1,000 Amount
2007 $ 278,920 0.1574 $ 43.90
2008 281,208 0.1525 42.88
Total Levy
The following table illustrates the total proposed levy (excluding the Cedanvale Special
Services District) for payable 2008 compared to the total levy for payable 2007.
COMPARISQN OF TOTAL LEVY
Final Proposed
2007 2008
Operating Levy
Debt Service Levy
Total
22,304,562 $ 23,417,149
1,198,523 1,199,363
Change
Amount Per Cent
$ 1,112,587 5.0%
840
0.1%
$ 23,503,085 $ 24,616,512 $ 1,113,427 4.7%
State TnT Hearing Requirement
The proposed allocation with the enhancements for infrastructure results in a levy that
requires a TnT Hearing. Since it is the City's past prectice to conduct the hearing
whether or not legally required, there are no changes to past practice being
recommended.
Total City Property Tax Capacity Rates/Property Tax Impact
In summary, based on the above referenced levies and current estimates for taxable
market value, tax capaciiy, fiscai disparities and tax increment values the payable 2008
tax capacity rate calculates to .25840 compared to .25232 for payable 2007, an increase
of 2.4%. The market value referendum rate for the Community Center bonds debt
service calculates to .0001525 for payable 2008 compared to .0001574 for payable
2007, a decrease of 3.1 %.
The following table of property tax history illustrates the estimated impact of the total
proposed levy for payable 2008 taxes and compares the rates and impacts to historical
tax rates and impacts for the years 2004 through 2007 on various market value
residential properties. Distribution of the MVHC for 2008 is based on consistent levies
from other taxing jurisdictions; any change in relative levies will affect the final credit
distribution slightly.
11
Eagan Property Tax History
City Taxes Only
Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2006
Tax Capacity Rate 028702 0.28186 0.26704 0.25232 0.25840
Market Value Rate 0.0001874 0.0001894 0.0001712 0.0001574 0.0001525
Market Value
150,000 $ 383 $ 375 $ 352 $ 326 $ 333
180,000 483 474 446 415 424
200,000 550 540 508 474 484
225,000 637 622 586 548 560
278,920 Pay 2007 Average Eagan Nouse Mkf Value
281,208 Pay 2008 Average Eagan House Mkt Value
300,000 885 869 820 771 787
The following table illustrates the impact of these rates on the property taxes on an
average market value property ($278,920) for payable 2007 compared to an average
market value property ($281,208) for payable 2006 thereby adjusting for infiation on
property values.
City Portion of Taxes on an Average Market Value House in Eagan
2007 Value: $ 278,920 2007 Ciry Tax: $ 709
2008 Value: 281,208 2008 City Tax: 730
Increase 0.8% Increase 3.0%
Figures Include Community Center Debt Service Levy
Impact on Property Taxes Resulfing From a Reduced Levy
The following table illustrates the impact on an average market value property
($281,208) for payable 2008 resulting from reductions of various amounts in the overall
tax levy. The reductions wouid result from a decision to levy at an amount less than the
proposed dollar amount. The reductions amount to approximately $3 to $4 on an annual
basis for each $100,000 that the levy is reduced.
12
Impact of Reductions in Tax Levy on Average Market Value House
$ 281,208 Market Value
City Tax Tax
At Proposed Capacity
Levy Rate
$ 730 0.25840
2007 Payble taxes on same house
valued at $278,920 were $709 with
tax ca acit rate of .25232.
Proposed Amount
Levy Adjusted of
Minus... City Tax Reduction
$100,000 $ 727 $ 3
200,000 724 6
300,000 721 9
400,000 717 13
500,000 714 16
600,000 711 19
700,000 708 22
800,000 704 26
Impact on Property Taxes Resulting From an Increased Levy
The following table illustrates the impact on an average market value property
($278,021) for payable 2007 resulting from increases of various amounts in the overall
tax levy. The increases would result from a decision to levy at a higher dollar amount.
The increases amount to approximately $3 to $4 on an annual basis for each $100,000
that the levy is increased.
Impact of Increases in Tax Levy on Average Market Value House
$ 281,208 Market Value
2007 Payble taxes on same house
valued at $278,920 were $709 with
tax ca aci rate of .25232.
General Fund Revenue Estimates
The preliminary 2008 budget as presented is balanced based on a continuation of the
City's established budge6ng practices; namely, revenues are budgeted conservatively,
but realistically. There are no significant increases to user fees for 2008. As aiways,
there are an infinite number of possible revenue combinations that could be used to
Tax Proposed Amount
Capacity Levy Adjusted of
Rate Plus... City Tax Increase
0.25840
$100,000 $ 734 $ 4
200,000 737 7
300,000 740 10
400,000 744 14
500,000 747 17
600,000 750 20
700,000 753 23
800,000 757 27
City Tax
At Proposed
Levy
$ 730
13
balance the preliminarybudget at the preliminary budget level or at an increased level to
maintain or even enhance service delivery in program areas as determined by the City
Council.
The financing of the City's General Fund operations remains heavily reliant on the
property tax related revenues as 71 % of the estimated 2008 revenue is from that source.
This percentage reflects Eagan's situation with little refiance on any State revenue
sources to finance General Fund operations. The estimate for MVHC for the General
Fund is $735,953 or 2.8% of the total budget. With current State law providing for the
payment of MVHC in the Ciry's 2008 fiscal year that revenue source is included in the
proposed 2008 budget. Any State response to potential revenue shortfalls in its budget
would likely include non-payment of the MVHC and wouid create a revenue shorlfall for
Eagan and other cities similarly treated.
Enclosed on page 23 is a copy of the Comparative Summary of F2evenues.
Enclosed on pages 24 through 26 is a copy of the Revenues By Line Item.
General Fnnd Expenditure Appropriations
The appropriations in the 2008 preliminary budget including the extraordinary increases
totals $26,688,500 which is a 4.87% inorease from the 2007 budget total of $25,449,300
including a minimal contingency in both years. Factoring out the extraordinary increase
and accounting changes the proposed General Fund budget reflects a modest 4.08%
increase providing for a constant level of services.
Outlined in the following table are the proposed 2008 expenditure allocations compared
to the 2007 budget; with allocations summarized by major classifications.
Expenditure Summary by Major Classifications
% Of % Of % % Of TOt21
2007 Total 2008 Total Chan e Chanae Increase
Personal Services $ 18,557,900 72.9% 19,418,400 72.8% $ 860,500 4.6% 69.4%
Parts and Supplies 1,665,900 6.5% 1,692,300 6.3% 26,400 1.6% 2.1°/a
Senrices and Other Charges 4,946,200 19.4% 5,338,500 20.0% 392,300 7.9% 31.7%
CapitalOutiay 233,600 0.9°!0 208,300 0.8% (25,300) -10.8% -2.0%
Merchandise for Resale 30,800 0.1% 16,000 0.1% (14,800) -48.1°k -1.2%
Contingency 14,900 0.1% 15,000 0.1% 100 0.7% 0.00!0
TOTAL $ 25,449,300 100.0% 26,688,500 100% $ 1,239,200 4.9% 100%
14
Total Budget Expenditures
$30
$25
.?
?
0
= $20
?
?s
...
? $15
?
?
c $10
?
$5
$-
0 Capital and Other
0 Services and Other
Charges
PA Parts and Supplies
¦ Personal Services
As is well known, in our service-oriented role as local government, labor is our primary
commodity, and thus consistently drives approximately three-quatters of the City's annual
budget. Changes to the overall 2008 personnei budget for existing and proposed
personnel compared to the 2007 personnel budget appropriation are further illustrated in
the following table. .
15
2007 2008
General Fund Personnel Summary
Existing Personnel
Regular Employees
Salaries/wageslovertime
PERA
FICA
Health/Life/L7D Insurance
Worker's Compensation
Volunteer Firefighters compensation
Fire Relief Association (pension)
Subtotal - Existing Personnel
New Positions *
Rec Prog Suprv - Art House (from .5 to .8)
Subtotal - New Positions
Posltion Reclassification
Customer Svc Coord - Recreation
Clerical Tech IV - Recreation
Subtotal - Reclassified Positions
2008 Budget
2007 2008 Change
% of Total
Budget Proposed $ % Change
$ 13,194,400 $ 13,755,900 $ 561,500 4.3% 65.3%
1,124,100 1,269,700 145,600 13:0% 16.9%
712,200 740,100 27,900 3.9% 3.2%
1,803,400 1,762,400 (41,000) -2.3% -4.8%
410,000 413,700 3,700 0.9% 0.4%
381,500 397,100 15,600 4.1°h 1.8%
144,600 227,500 82,900 57.3% 9.6%
17,770,200 18,566,400 796,200 4.5% 92.5%
17,$00 2.1 %
17,800 2.1 %
48,000 5.6%
(46,100) -0.2%
1,900 0.0%
- 60,000 60,000 7.0%
15,000 15,000 - 0.0% 0.0%
3,400 6,100 2,700 79.4% 0.3%
13,800 18,600 4,800 34.8% 0.6%
22,800 17,100 (5,700) -25.0% -0.7%
14,300 15,000 700 4.9% 0.1%
629,500 610,500 (19,000) -3.0% -2.2%
88,900 90,000 1,100 1.2% 0.1%
787,700 832,300 44,600 5.7% 5.2%
TemporarylSeasonal
City Clerk (Elections)
Comm Deve4 (P{anning lntern/APC record secy)
Communications (Seasonal intern)
Pub Wks(Engineering (Seasonal Intern)
Pub WkslStreets (Temp/Seasonal)
Central Svcs Maint. (Temp/Seasonal)
Parks/Recreation (Temporary/5easonal)
Tree Conservation (Temporary/Seasonal)
Subtotal -TemporarylSeasonal
Total Personnel
$ 18,557,900 $ 19,418,400 $ 860,500 4.6%
New Positions does not include a"placeholder" amount of $75,000 in Other Services & Charges in the Finance
Dept budget for a position that is yet to be defined due to a contemplated reorganization resulting from a recent
resignation.
The scenario as presented in the preliminary budget maintains the percentage of the
budget dedicated to personal services at approximately 73% and the allocation continues
to reflect the intensity of personnel costs to deliver local government services. Overtime
allocations remain at approximately the 2007 levels to provide for unavoidable
circumstances such as police invesiigations, police cail for service responses that cross
shifts, filling out patrol shifts, and snow plowing, etc. The overtime allocation also covers
16
the required peak service demand times without increasing the personnel compiement
necessary for base level staffing for ongoing activities.
The following summary illustrates the 2008 increases to the budget as well as the three
extraordinary items that are incorporated into the proposed budget, which can make
simple percentage comparisons problematic:
2008 General Fund Increases
Budgeted
Expenses % Increase
2007 Adopted General Fund Budget $ 25,449,300
Personal Services Changes
COLA and step increases on existing staff 840,800 3.30%
New finance position 75,000 0.29%
Recreation position reclassifications 19,700 0.08%
Non-Personal 5ervices Changes
Ordfnary and customary/inflationary increases 102,500 0.40%
2008 Apples to Apples Btidget 26,487,300 4.08%
Other Extraordinary Items
Dakota County CJIIN Partnership --> IT 45,500 0.18%
Total Election Costs --> City Clerk 69,100 0.27%
DCCeap+leFcASts --> Police 86,600 0.34%
s ;r4??Oq.?.?
2008 Proposed Budget
$ 26,688,500
4.87%
General Fund Budget Increases
w
?
$1,600
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$o
6.0%
Extraordinary Items
offlInflationary
Increases
Ei New Positions less
reductions
¦ COLA and step
increases on
17
2007 2008
Enclosed on page 27 is a copy of the Comparative Summary of Expenditures.
Enclosed on pages 28 through 30 is a copy of the Comparative Expenditures by
Department by Type.
Enclosed on pages 32 through 132 is a copy of the individual department narratives and
line item preliminary budgets:
Contingency Account
The preliminary budget as prepared by the City Administrator includes a very small
budgeted contingency account of $15,000 primarily for the purpose of facilitating small
changes during the budget implementation. This presentation combined with no use of
the fund balance to support 2008 on-going operations continues the City Council
direction in response to the 2004 budget public policy considerations for use of the
Contingency Account and Fund Balance. An adequate savings account is continued in
the fund balance to be used to provide security and flexibility in future operafions. That
savings account rerriains undesignated in the General Fund in the preliminary budget.
Previously, the City actually budgeted from current resources approximately 2% of the
budgeted operations into the contingency account in addition to maintaining the fund
balance at approximately 30 to 35% of the next year's expenditures. The fund balance
target has subsequently been revised to 40 to 45% of the next year's expenditures. Per
previous City Council direction the appropriate level and use of the fund balance will
continue to be reviewed for potential future modification.
Supplementary Funding Sources and Uses Not Included In the General Fund
Budget
The 2008 proposed General Fund budget incorporates two items that were previously
funded through an allocation of fund balance, including a DCC start up amount of
$86,600 and a CJIIN fee of $45,500. Therefore, no supplementary funding sources are
considered in the 2008 budget.
Certain capital purchases related to General Fund operations will be given consideration
in the CIP Part II and funded through the Equipment Revolving Fund. That budget will
be presented to the City Council for approval later in the year. Similarly, certain items
related to General Facilities Renewal and Replacement will be funded through the fund
created for that purpose and considered later.
Available resources will be allocated in each of these funds to provide the necessary
funding if the expenditures are approved. Staff will determine a priority expenditure list
for funding and present it to the City Council for consideration.
General Fund Fund Balance
No current, proposed expenditures are recommended for financing through the General
Fund fund balance for the 2008 budget.
18
The General Fund fund balance as reported in the December 31, 2006 Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report was $70,272,038. This balance calculates to 40.4% of the
budgeted 2007 expenditures and is undesignated and available as a contingency and to
provide working capital for operations.
Based on the continuation of City Council direction used in the preparation of the 2004
budget operations, the Fund Balance is set aside to provide for emergency or
unanticipated expenditure appropriations during the balance of 2007 and 2008. During
the 2004 budget deliberations, it was determined that it would be prudent to eliminate
the budgeted operating contingency and to use the Fund Balance as a contingency
account.
The position of the fund balance is as follows:
December 31, 2006 Fund Balance
Minus Appropriations included in 2007 Budget
Projected 12-31-07 Balance
Minus Proposed Appropriations for 2008 Budget
Projected 12-31-08 Balance
Fund Balance Target at 40%
Projected Variance From Target
Projected 12-31-2007 Fund Balance as % of 2008 Budget
$10,272,038
(134,900)
$10,137,138
$10,137,138
$ 10,669,400
$ 532,262
38%
Again, per previous City Council direction the appropriate level and use of the fund
balance will continue to be reviewed for potential future modification.
Cedarvale Special Services District
Prior to the preliminary levy certffication, a final determination will be made concerning
the appropriate levy for fhe Cedarvale Special Services District. The levy for payable
years 2003 through 2005 was $2,000 annually. The levy for payable 2006 was raised to
$3,000 and is currently proposed at that level for payable 2008.
Truth In Taxation Hearina Dates
On or before September 15, 2007 the City must certify to the County Auditor the dates it
has selected for its public hearing and for the continuation of its hearing, if a continuation
of the hearing becomes necessary. Cities essentially choose after the counties, special
service districts, and school districts, although December 3 and December. 10 are
reserved for cities until September 15. Given these parameters, December 3 works
nicely for the City. The first December meeting has already been scheduled for Monday,
December 3 rather than Tuesday, December 4. The continuation hearing, ff necessary,
could be scheduled for the tentatively scheduled Special City Council meeting on
Monday, December 10 with the final adoption at the second regularly scheduled
December meeting on the 18t'.
Action will need to be taken at the September 4 mee6ng to set the schedule accordingly.
19
Public Policv Issues
The following are matters of public policy for the City Council's consideration at this time:
1. Truth in Taxation Hearing Dates -- The Council is asked to approve or modify
the recommended dates per State scheduling requirements. The proposed
dates are Monday, December 3, which is a scheduled regular City Council
meeting for the initial hearing and December 10, which would be a special
meeting for the continuation hearing, if one were necessary. Final action would
take place at the regular meeting scheduled for December 18.
2. Preliminary Tax Levy - Is the proposed amount and allocation of the 2008
properEy tax levy appropriate?
? Specifically, is a 3% property tax increase on the average value property the
correct amount to provide for additional infrastructure improvements, and
renewal and replacement?
The Council is asked to provide direction to staff for the preparation of required
material for consideration at the September 4, 2007 regular City Council meeting.
Fund Balance - The Council is asked to reaffirm or modify its determination on
the use of the Fund Balance as a contingency for operations and as a savings
account.
4. Feedback on Revenue Estimates/Expenditures Appropriations -- The City
Council is asked to provide feedback for the City Administrator to continue
preparation for the Truth in Taxation Hearing and for final budget preparation.
Together with the Department and Division Heads, I submit this recommended
preliminary budget, the enclosed budget information and these policy issues for your
consideration.
City Administrator Hedges
20
2005 Per Capita Total Expenditures
MN Cities with 50,000+ Population
(Source: Office of the State Auditor, December 2006)
Eagan
Coon Rapids
Brooklyn Park
Minnetonka
Plymouth
Blaine
Bumsvi I le
Eden Prairie
Woodhury
Lakeville
Rochester
Bloomington
St. Cloud
Maple Grove
St. Paul
Duluth
Minneapolis
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500
21
2007 Payable City Property Taxes
$278,920 Market Value House (Eagan Average)
Plymouth
Eagan
Mendota Heights
Minnetonka
Eden Preirie
Maple Grove
Woodbury
Coon Rapids
Lakeville
Bloomington
18-City Average
South St. Paui
Burnsville
Inver Grove Heights
Apple Valley
Brookiyn Park
West St. Paul
Rosemount
Hastings
$0 $400 $800 $1,200 $1,600
22
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Building
Permit Number:EA142481
Date Issued:05/04/2017
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Lot:2 Block: 1 Addition: Kingswood Ponds 1st
PID:10-42050-01-020
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Reroof
Work Type:Replace
Description:Does not include skylight(s)
Census Code:434 -
Zoning:
Square Feet:0
Occupancy:
Construction Type:
Comments:Please print pictures of ice and water protection and leave on site.
Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State
Building Code).
Valuation: 4,000.00
Fee Summary:BL - Base Fee $4K $103.25 0801.4085
Surcharge - Based on Valuation $4K $2.00 9001.2195
$105.25 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Timothy P Wilkin
1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Eagan MN 55122
(612) 554-7273
Dean Nelson Shingler Inc
W11124 State Hwy 35
Stockholm WI 54769
(651) 726-4911
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Mechanical
Permit Number:EA150019
Date Issued:06/18/2018
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Lot:2 Block: 1 Addition: Kingswood Ponds 1st
PID:10-42050-01-020
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Residential
Work Type:Replace
Description:Furnace & Air Conditioner
Comments:Questions regarding electrical permit requirements should be directed to State Electrical Inspector, Mark Anderson at (952)
445-2840.
Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection.
Fee Summary:ME - Permit Fee (Replacements)$59.00 0801.4088
Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195
$60.00 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Timothy Shiell
1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Eagan MN 55122
(715) 563-2093
One Hour Heating & Air
11825 Point Douglas Rd S
Hastings MN 55033
(651) 437-4177
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing
Permit Number:EA171919
Date Issued:09/07/2021
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Lot:2 Block: 1 Addition: Kingswood Ponds 1st
PID:10-42050-01-020
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Residential
Work Type:Replace
Description:Standard Water Heater
Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size
Comments:Carbon monoxide detectors are required within 10 feet of all sleeping room openings in residential homes (Minnesota State
Building Code).
Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection.
Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$59.00 0801.4087
Surcharge-Fixed $1.00 9001.2195
$60.00 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Timothy & Carolyn Shiell
1415 Kingswood Ponds Rd
Eagan MN 55122
(715) 563-2093
One Hour Heating & Air
11825 Point Douglas Rd S
Hastings MN 55033
(651) 437-4177
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature