07/07/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
CE
-TAKE-NOTICE
A BOX LUNCH WITH THE a CH1 ECTS IS SCHEDULED FOR
6:00 P.M.
JULY 7, 1988
CITY HALL vv L NCE RC
NOTE: REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING TO FOLLOW AT 7;30 P.M.
TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: JULY 1, 1988
RE: JULY 7, 1988 ADVISORY PARKS At,, RECR[t JP I SIGN MEETING
Please make special note that the Advisory Commission will meet at 6:00 P.M.
in the conference rooms at City Hall. A box lunch will be provided at that
time.
h ,
The Design Team from Hastings and t', i vetta Arch E 1 ; e„ r, nq wit:
Commission at that time. The D s<< ill bE i in the }<y
and an agenda for their meet ; w=F , tr focu.. gvc,u;..s, and City
Administrator, as well as individual staff members has been tabl"shed. They
would like to use the 6:00 dinner hour as an opportunity to meet with the
Commission informally. If there is sufficient time, Staff would also llkf.a to
review with the Advisory Commission, photos that wer" t:' i at 11,e
Recreational Facilities Design and Management school in Cots . !,ouir ~J.c et
contains a brief memorandum on the facilities vi t )rl the
school.)
At 7:30 P.M. the Commission will adjourn to the Council ~..s or it's
regularly scheduled meeting.
Staff has attempted to reduce the number of items on this Commission agenda
and consequently, the agenda is relatively short. There are a number of
consent items for your review and one development proposal.
Under old business, Intern Mel 6a .11 u a t` v C m i s (b~~r zn 'A 'd the park representative program, i f will k CI s
of the Commission and a member of the ;advisory C: ,ion b a,~, ,.,4 1 to ae t
with this group the last week in July or the first week in AugiL...
There are two items under new business. Cathy Dybiek, Intern with the F' rrls
Department under Superintendent VonDeLinde, has been r igne d 1
responsibility of developing or drafting a long-term C. I . P. fc °zC,-1"1 V) t
park related equipment including such things as pla ar3W>,
etc. Cathy will be present at this meeting to pr I. P. s
part of her internship. Cathy will be 1 ,t,,o,in.g the ac., ;.hirJ
of July and we have truly appreciated her excellent assiL The 1. .s
Department.
The second item under new business pertains to FP~.'rr,v P. ai I . A
g +h_,_
1 L ;•:'i. 2-Ei l)~-.tJEE E
separate memorandum has been pro~~i eo~~ k'in;,
reading by the Commission. The r o_ Pu H
present at this meeting to assist he x,.p nid-iL ' [ ulf o:.,Is 1 j uat i Ps
which have been requested by the neiohbors.
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
There are no recent park development items to be reported. The "Hap rinHH "
will bring you up to date on several of the issues curr(An,1~- ire prog..
Staff would like this opportunity to discuss w.,'- t ry f r :1-is:ion ti:"I
utilization of construction managers for t h shco, i,:r
the referendum become successful. The d E_~,1 ~,nr.rru3.
concept approval is necessary in order i nH.. di ',i I >p, ru ided he
architects, etc.
There are several items that Staff would like to bring to the Ccmmi< ian's
attention under "Other Business and Reports" including Department Hpper.Hnis.
Again, as always, i f members of the Advisory Ccr fission ar a unabd0 to H ,n
the Commission meeting, notification to the n~ ;l it J,J.. , ~Er j : c I 1a ~ e~J.
F. sr-.ituxlly submitted,
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks and Recreation
KV:cm
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Thursday, July 7, 1988
6:00 P.M.
Eagan Municipal Center
6:00 Meeting with architects ren r fi; r tty f e'~
Municipal Center co_oferen
7:30 P.M. Regular Advisory Commissio.. ing Eagan iic pal
C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of Agenda
E. Approval of Minutes of the Regula.- ...,ig of
F. Consent Agenda
(1) Boulder Cre L Addition - ® r ; :io -l}.
(2) All Saints Luwieran Church Audition - V 'r.,Osan Crr truction
(3) Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition - Federal Land Co.
G. Development Proposals
(1) Rahncliff 2nd Addition - Austin Companies
Old Business
(1) Eagan Park Representatives
1. New Business
(1) Facilities Replacement Program
(2) Berry Ridge Park
J. Park Development Update
(1) Construction Management
K. Other Business and Reports
(1) Happenings
(2) Report on Recreation Facility Design and Management School
L. Adjournment
Subject to approval
MINUTES OF A RFC' AR
THE ADVISORY PARKS AND iIS ION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 2, 1988
A regular meeting of the Advisory k; and Re' y ea!, k , un wa
called to order at 7:45 P.M. on Thum
Commission Members present: Dick Carro i i , i r 1r; , ,gar 1
Masin, George Kubik, JoAnne Alt and Bo., Purt~::. iu CG~r
Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscap cii :t,"ir" 1 r1ner,
Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLinde; Recreation Supervisor,
Dorothy Peterson and Parks Secretary, Cherryl Mesko. Commission Member not
present was David Hennes.
AGENDA
Berry s <1; h park and rur ak Park dd- a }
Director Vraa asked i-"
the agenda under Other Bus in With Yhiis additio., Jc A c, Alt Gov"ed ::o
accept the agenda as amended, Sandy Masin -,~conded with all in-nIhers voting in
favor.
MINUTES FROM MAY 5, 1988 METING
Page 1 3 , Paragraph 2 , Sentence 3 was s s E , z r c 4n
the sentence to be "old" rather than "only". o~
Dick Carroll moved to accept the minutes as cK -d
with all members voting in favor.
CONSENT AGENDA
The following consent agenda items were presented for approval. s a
motion by JoAnne Alt, seconded by Bob Porter with all members ;:uI ng i f;,
the Commission approved recommendation to the City Cc:-;.ir-il ot the fol I: ring
items:
1. SAFARI ESTATES 4TH ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash
parkland dedication.
2. SOLDERHOLM ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash parkland
dedication and a five foot concrete sidewalk be placed along the
north side of Diffley Road.
to a pa e
3. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - That this plat b
dedication.
Advisory Parks and Recreation ,-sion
Minutes of June 2, l)88 °0ic,eting
Page 2
KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION
Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan pr, sen t d C 7W s s i Of, with ti=e
background information relative to the-. Ki.qr P, t nn kdh is VQnst
t _ e
of Pilot Knob Road, directly acrd. _ f , ,,~m > , c -e'-1
development i s proposing to take td a ~
Kingswood Road location, however ano4he- possible access would be ixte,,d
the cul-de-sac from Coronation Road to Pilot Knob Road. Pilot Knob is planned
to be 5 lanes( 2 right, 2 left and 1 center turn lane). Encaineering and
Planning are currently reviewing the Coronation access to detc'm- ne if this
will be more appropriate.
Director Vraa has approached Har - s ir, s and'
7i ~t
layout and after a very brief re _ n
Road access as it is being propos i would 1 :U k„t fn, llh rop,o , t''
community center. Because of the preliminary nature ok' l e architect's
review, they strongly encouraged the City of Eagan to allow adequate time to
do a comprehensive access study for the community center because of tie long
term impact it will have.
Member Masin indicated that sht would 1i" t.>
information before the Commi^s io as a
location. Steve Sullivan noted tha Lhe ` ouncil
Addition on June 21st and that Hastings and Chivi r h vn a,' e
time to do a study by that date nor does the Commission have an opportun'sr to
review the results before making a recommendation.
Chairman Carroll stated it was a serious responsibility to insure this
is carefully planned and that the police department should be invo' in tine
review. He stated that an early decision shouldn't be made ut1 av e=ue
study could be made by Hastings and Chivptt . After further C,t ,k
Carroll moved to continue this issue a it ThL. July 8, 1988 C_ ni i3g
because of the critical need for Staff and Cc -lion to revie the is._ <:d
allow sufficient time for the architects to make an adequate analysis of the
access and it's impact on the proposed community center site. The motion
further stated that the developer be responsible for a cash parkland
dedication and that an 8 foot bituminous trail be placed adjacent In `zlc.t
Knob Road. Sandy Masin seconded the motion and all Commission
in favor.
Member Kubik questioned if Staff could ;I 01' cif the
Commission's concerns and Director Vraa indicates uuId Kinv. t.,"', City
Administrator of concerns and ask to be kept advised of future developrnnts.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of June 2, 1988 Meeting
Page 3
PARK SERVICE DISTRICT 10E
Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan reviewed th -11 p,- r k C, ; S `tr-i ct V IC
impact of the O'Neill property being rezoned prom Cu ,rcial .I- ned
Development to an amended commercial planned development id the L_ ::jton
Land Company's request for the rezoning from multiple f-nily to planned
development of 57 acres. Both proposals are located north of Yaulket, Doodle
Road between I-35E and Lexington Avenue.
The property from the two proposals enrp.v Ca
District 10E. Only 6 single family residentii,l
park service area thus the question is whether itnn i s a e ~~.v i de a
park to service this area within the City.
Member Masin questioned how much land would be acquired if we wc' ~o
require a parkland dedication to which Steve Sullivan responded 1C-17 _C'C;}s.
Sandy Masin asked if this spot could be conside _I or are
Dick Carroll commented that this had been cons " r{
found that this was not an effective U,t>
grading that would need to be done to c S a
noted that very few athletic sites at loped t at are t 6r t
Member Kubik noted that since this site had been reviewed before fog~~'; Lis
fields and had been found to be inappropriate, perhaps a cash dedication 1)uld
be appropriate for this parcel and questioned what that amount mw=ht be.
Director Vraa responded by saying that the acreage was actually -loto 11-
12 acres and that the cash at buildout of this property would :s pp>= ox i, Iatcly
$350,000. Mr. Vraa noted that an option would be to re ay u
to include the service area to the south of 10E, which 3r;c.t
17. George Kubik indicated that this would fit in s
occurring in this southern park district area.
After further discussion, George Kubik moved, Dick Carroll seconded with
all members voting in favor to delete the existing Park District #10E and add
it to the existing Park District #17. It was noted that the cash tHi cH..ion
would come before the Commission as the proposed areas that impact his new
Park District were developed.
°IRA . CsESSI0 S
Recreation Supervisor, Dot-uthy Peterson brought the Commission u, to
date on the request from Mr. Sitko to operate a traveling concession sttanJ in
Eagan Parks. She noted that we had also received a request from Blue Bell to
enter the parks for the sale of their products from their trucks. 1
options had been discussed at the last Commission ,,A-in a--' Dorot'y n
and John VonDeLinde were directed to draft a l i r' r ' s f..~: ri c h
this concession could operate relative to 1 i li i~,af,~Ons to
consider within the p etc. Doroth s ifhere
were specific questions regarding the gu_'~lines t -t had bE yawn up and
asked for direction regarding these guidelines.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of June 2, 1988
Page 4
Proof of liability insurance, naming the City as an additional insured
in the amount of $600,000 is a requirement that is standard procedure. Also
required would be the proof of State of Minnesota Health Department li::_urise
submitted prior to approval of start of operation and a permit fee, per wagon
unit, of $200.00. George Kubik noted that the $200 appeared to be a [at-
amount.
After much discussion,
regulatory program for concessions~Gc:;_,_:: .:x~..
and professionalism with the 1_llowing cif::: r nt•/I tins in
addition to the necessary insurance and license requir it s:
a. Vendor's vehicle and trailer for wagon units u-t comply with the
single stall parking configuration in City t
b. Vendor may set up no closer than 150 r ro u
equipment.
C. Hours of operation pern;L d ire:
6:00 P.M. - 9:00 P... on week-days
3:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. on week-ends and holidays
d. City parks excluded from approval are:
Trapp Farm Park
Goat Hill Parfr
Northview At`l ~c Fields
Thomas Lake Park
Carnelian Park
Vienna Woods Park
Bridle Ridge Park
Lakeside Park
Cedar Pond Park on Wednesday evenings prior to 8:030 P.M.
e. The term of approval to operate in 1 is if * sober,.
f. The vendor is required to provide a trash i ~ cE,+ ak a on the
concession wagon.
g. Prior to leaving a site, the vendor is to ensure t--,t litter
associated with his/her operation is picked up and vcd from
the park.
h. The vendor is to supply identifiable uniforms to h artkers.
i. An exit interview will b u8u tea rn' of sea i 'n
r la S tL IS c ct 1v62T, i to f
order that vendor and sty i
gross receipts, quantiti3s of products sold, .e., th sufoc= > of
the venture.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Ca------- iasion
Minutes of June 2, 1988 Meeting
Page 5
j. The City's authorization does not extend to school property.
k. Failure to comply with limitations will t mate a ravaI to
operate.
Michele Swanson seconded C,io with n tavar .
George Kubik further moved, Sandy Masin sec+ with all n~ s voting
in favor to approve Mr. Sitko's request within the constraints °ast approved
with the understanding that this is an experiment and will run for a period of
one year.
Mr. Kubik thanked Mr. Sitko for ±h' i novel hi
on behalf of the Commission. He 1 i ~ e,-J
VonDeLinde for an excellent job in riag tlh pu Cd= lii es.
BLACKHAWK PARK SOUTH ACCESS
Director Ken Vraa asked that this item be deferred to the next
Commission meeting.
SMALL LAKES MANAGEMENT GRANT
Parks Superintendent John VonDeL.. r=c : i A r _ h e- C s fat the
information relative to the DNR's new 111 :r m,.;olitan Small Lakr> Man qen
Grant Program for lakes between 10 and 100 acres. Since this encompas:se 111dny
of Eagan's lakes John felt it was appropriate to apply for funds which would
enhance fisheries management in some of our lakes.
Sandy Masin asked if we would need to r-zpply each which
Mr.VonDeLinde responded affirmatively. When tf -7lication 4- would
need to be site specific, however, CNR d-- th irr ~wh ich
they will be handled. George Kubik -2stioned W.. 1 he
the program whether it be removal of algae, installing docks, lendings, el,,.-.
and Mr. VonDeLinde indicated it would be for the length of the grant program.
Several lakes were suggested as priorities and after discussion,
Commission Listed the following lakes in their order of priority; Thomas La Heine Pond, Blackhawk Lake. JoAnne Alt asked if we could apply for more tOan
one grant and John VonDeLinde suggest -A that we apply for all *hree lakes.
Sandy Masin moved, George 'econded with a,l °s voting in
favor to have Staff proceed with )plying for the grant( aaked on the
priorities as the Commission stated.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of May 5, 1988 Meeting
Page 6
PORTABLE STAGE
Director Ken Vra d .,-Eon She sic
regarding the purchase o, a port ble stage. TI cost est-id,as' wore i Muted
in a memorandum to the Comr...s.cion Members. Chairman Carroll c_curroc that it
would be a good idea to be able to coordinate this effort with other
communities if possible. Mr. Vraa stated that the 8 x 8 would be a good size
for small stages and if the need arises for a larger -t_ it would be
beneficial to borrow from neighboring communities and vice
George Kubik noted that when the Cite i, rsable s
we were able to get a negotiate a good deal z° rEe `
their inventory and asked if it was possible to do the
Vraa indicated that this was a situation when that probably ?ul l't ha.
George Kubik moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all mcmtsrs v log in
favor to have Staff continue to keep Commission advis l So i" ' ra
share the costs of the portable stage with other communities u pare
the use of the stage sections as is needed.
Dick Carroll noted for the record that s .rtical ;o u
of consideration in investigating the purchase of stage unit.
TRAIL SURVEY
Director Ken Vraa introduced Bonnie Blood, Recrec'-i C,.) Tn-r ~f
Commission indicating that she would be presenting a rep-r:. a La
that she had been working on as an intern with the Depar'
Bonnie prefaced hE ~ . -?rt by noSie: :,he trail survey t _ 'our s
of time to complete and sW was aided in sc.. o. her research by u, park and
recreation intern. She explained to thy.: Co ___ii ssi on that she was [ sing he,r
report on a comparison done by an intern in 1981. She noted that there were
many different trends and results from the original survey which took a period
of one month to accomplish.
One of the statistics showed that gin; 19> 1 %
walkers using the existing trails
ree traveling frt e
currently. Some of the trail users a
w
and Rosemount to use Eagan's trails. 50% of the people d u. ails
3 times a week or more, 93% use them once a week or more rand 7 an the
trail for the first time. An interesting note is that 43% discered the
trails simply by walking in their neighborhoods and found them quite by
accident.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of June 2, 1988 Meeting
Page 7
Both in 1981 and in 1988 the - pt}rt , ±ant a; ni I
more trails; more specifically in 198° they wrnt ttx existing trails to be
linked so their trips are uninterrupted. Overall there were very few dislikes
however, the most frequent request was to have the trails plowed in the winter
so that walkers could continue to use them in all weather.
Chairman Carroll commented on what interesting resui repeat
revealed and thanked Bonnie for the thorough information she Q' p 4ed,
RAHN o' '?ARKING LOT
Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan reviewed the Cliff Lake Centre
Development's agreement to provide a parking lot servicing Rahn Park wi¢in
the abandoned portion of Rahn Road. The parking lot was to mitigate He
safety concerns of Rahn Park users as influenced by the additional tra l on
Rahn Road. The realignment of Rahn Road intr r - e c t i n i i t h Cl i . Lak _ :_;r ve
provided a portion of unused roa" ° ihich
use. The graphic that was pres._r,, to the , c i _ si i i ~of
40 parking spaces in the des anated area f r par i Doe of the
considerations would be to provide a drive aisle frosv the pr pos end parking
area to the existing gravel lot, or chain off the parking area to the prav~el
lot only using on an overflow basis, i.e. 4th of July celebration. The third
alternative would be to eliminate the gravel parking lot completely and extend
the bituminous trail to the sidewalk adjacent to the improved par ing area and
place turf on the existing gravel area to expand the ricnickin 1.
JoAnne Alt suggested deleting the gravel r 1nt so t e , the hi 1
area can be put into turf. Michele Swanson sug~ ted !c-ig at the 00 ion of
adding more parking area, as many as the site ..ill accommodate, to discourage
parking on Rahn Road. Steve Sullivan indicated that the parking lot could be
expanded somewhat but did not know exactly how many more spaces c-ld fit.
Michele Swanson moved, JoAnne Alt seconded, with all ot ncj in
favor to extend the parking lot to the maximum it can hold, -t: ravel
lot to a green area and extend 4f trail to the ni ea.
Steve Sullivan noted fc' Commission that 80_- r° will be providing
tree enhancements over the trenching area in Rahn Park as the Commission had
requested. They will be planting approximately 150 trees in that area.
George Kubik stated this was a good first step and that he was pleased it was
being done.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of June 2, 1988 Meeting
Page 8
THOMAS LAKE PARK
Pre-construction meeting will be conduct for this -a., k on hnrsd ,
June 9th. The building is staked and work shc-- st~rt;ri~ fi "lin the next
three weeks. Wayne Sames asked if there wo,-' 11 t a,ee, ss since
Pilot Knob would be under construction r= h pc e hat
gains access to Thomas Lake Park. Steve Sullivan t:;ed U- they were aware
of the situation and that arrangements had been made to make sure the pack is
accessible.
OHMANN PARK/WI KL JACKSON PARK/ IDLE RIDGE PARK
Steve Sullivan reported that the final graphics had 2 C OM[_) teo for
the development of these parks and that the spFci1 icat yens a E t is
shortly to allow for a bid opening of July 1?,
1987 PARK PROJECT UPDA
Steve Sullivan reported that the final punch list is not quite complete
as of this date but that a final walk-through of the building will place
next Friday. Dick Carroll asked if the sod had been rep<a -lue
Cross/Blue Shield. Steve Sullivan noted that th^ - -a around t was
completed and the area around the bui l d will b
EAGAN PARK RRESENTI,i _ S
Ken Vraa shared with the Commission t' program of looking for
neighborhood participation for the local parks. The program is set up and Mel
Bailey, Parks Intern, is working on soliciting help from residents near
various parks in the City. He has had some response but not all parks are
represented to date.
Dick Carroll suggested that fight con a i a [l e i nt n
invitation to the annual picnic so that they would f n intetra f
the whole group effort.
Mel Bailey has contacted the newspapers and placed an ad to solicit more
participation.
BERRY PATCH PARK
The bituminous trail south of Outlot A that continue; r R dqe
to Patrick Eagan Park has experienced some flooding and danw, e to i 'Eu tra ii l .
Approximately 200 dead trees have been removed after the lift s w..'_i on pumped
the water out of the area.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of June 2,1988 Meeting
Page 9
Tom Colbert, Tom Hedges and Ken Vraa have attended a r;oi hbor hoo
meeting to hear the comments from the residents. Water ual y, app red be
an issue and the residents want to look he opti r o 7 _ -r
elevation and abandoning the trail. tat ~ it
to raise the water level versus havin, _,i1 s-,,nCik> -L
much use. The Engineering Department is researching the poss ,d
feasibility of raising the water level of Mooney Lake. Ken Vraa d
that a trail run through the area in front of the homes since 'h d
trail is the link from Pilot Knob to Patrick Eagan parks and is topc e in
the trail system.
Staff will keep the Commi ssi ( r s :0(:I on the orog' :his
situation.
With there being no further business to conduct, George Kubik ,~o:av°edi.
Michele Swanson seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
DATE SECRETARY
LIORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 29, 1988
SUBJECT: CONSENT AGENDA - JULY 7, 1988
1. MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CO. - BOULDER CREST WEST ADDITION A rezoning of 22.5
A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a
Pre1iminarv Plat, consisting of 47 lots located between Hwy. #3 nE~ the
Inver Grove City limits along the south side of Cliff Road in the NL 1/4
of Section 36.
RECOMMENDATION:
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication and an eight (8) foot
wide bituminous trail be placed along the south side of Cliff Road.
2. VANMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. - ALL SAIMTF LUTH. CHURCH ADD.ehensive
Guide Plan Amendment PI arnea"e, _ ; "i v _ J
Prgliminar Plat of approxif ait=,1„ 1 1 he
Lexington South Planned De °t l ~ n t an: i ti )
district within the Planned Devel -iic:t for a church site located at the
SE intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road in the NW 1/4 of
Section 23.
RECOMMENDATION:
Parkland dedication be waived for the carch 1-nd ,,,.3e. Any future
change in land use , ill be subject to a nd ded _ t i gin . The
develops In stall f i~ (5') foot wide s. l k l the s i d of
Lexington Road.
3. FEDERAL LAND CO. - TOWN CENTRE 70 TENTH ADDITION a Pr liminar Plat f
1.91 CSC zoned acres and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a car v h
facility and motor fuel sales and a Variance for a canopy setback
located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70, 1st Additi n
or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70, Ninth Addition located he' n
Hwy.#35E and Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15.
RECOMMENDATION
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
SS/bls
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION C+ PIS`~ION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLAiNLR
DATE: JUNE 29, 1988
RE: RAHN/CLIFF - 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL
The proposal is for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, and rezoning g,on
Limited Business/Roadside Business to Commercial Planned Development. This
proposal also includes the preliminary plat of six (6) lots and three (3)
outlots on 16.8 acres. The proposed land uses are for a bank, resturant, fast
food, office and retail.
BACKGROUND
The site's southern property line is directly adjacent to the northerly
unimproved section of Vienna Woods Park. This area was left undisturbed with
the development of the park. It's primary use is for storm water retention as
identified by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This ponding area is
referenced as AP-44. The development proposes to utilise th^. PoOding :arr,
within Vienna Woods Park. The easterly unimproved pond basic on ~_~r rovi de
adequate storage for this proposal and the additional os: dev lc~_l; nt.
ISSUES
The Commission will need to review and make recommendations in regard to the
following issues:
1. The additional runoff into AP-44 will result in the impn.. of the
easterly basin area within the park, the Commissic.. 11 Sneed to
determine what improvement alternative; n the best in. of the
Vienna Woods Park.
2. What is the park dedication requirment?
ISSUE #1
With the development of Vienna Woods Park a central small nk was "Impro°v'e
o ?tv within tP
with shoreline upgrading. A second pond area located n
park was left unimproved. This undeveloped basin is curre t' in
meadowgrasses, has drainage to a adjacent MnDot outlet and is not i.` ur
park utilization. Both ponds are AP-44 and connected with a IL" di- ...r
equalization pipe. For clear definition within this memo, the imp °ved
ponding area will be defined as "basin A" and the unimproved as "basin B".
RAHN/CLIFF -2ND ADDITION
PAGE 2
The proposed storm water volume excec,,?r the capacity of AP-44. -Ras", A, s - 1
improved, offers no additional volu , without severly disrupting the park
layout. Basin B, can be improved by grading, thus providing adequate storage
capacity for the watershed area. This would also include raising the High
Water Level in both basins one (1) foot. This increase would have no
significant impact to the park. There are several options in regards to the
improvement of basin B. The basin could be engineered as a dry pond, f«Atland
or wet pond. Staff feels that disturbed terrestrial .r,-,as shoult. z L~>k ~d
with prairie mix seeding. Currently, the pro )r not improvement drawing. Ponding improvement submitt:. 1 c ct~ ~i~ l
plat. The Commission should consider either sta-.P -pp oval or v ~f2-e
drawings returned for approval at the next Advisory Parks & Recreation
Commission meeting.
ISSUE #2
The development will be subject to a cash 'land dedication.
FOR COMMISSION APPROVAL
The Commission may consider the following recommendations to approve the
preliminary plat of Rahn/Cliff, 2nd Addition:
1. To have a basin B improved as either a dry pond, wetland or w t
2. To have improvement drawing of basin B reviewed and approv€ tides=
OR
brought before the Advisor=r° Pal` A "a i for e,d --d
approval.
3. The developer provide a cash pay-land d dication.
SS/bls
10
VIENNA WOOUO PARK
71
(
CL1RF ROAD
s
1 1j
e
a oz
1111 1 k~ li ( Ciao..)
oil
~f 1 111 i1151
I fi mr `
-oq
,II fi~
~ ~ I ~I ~ I 1 14f g
z g a
G' Jr s x x •x" S x r r
« .ca,~:.aa s rt 8 a 8 4 1
sPgsrs a e a z c c" It C
.any,, E i l IN
~ xkxxxxxxxx ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~
n w N k t
~ i ~
q. J,
PR -U
Wr®~
_g na
X3 >
00
cn
Q - m -t PQ
3 te- i 4 '43
r t D f'
m lU _ D< D Q o
IT
G
i e5y
o
« J F CA
rr w
1 r $
~c oa _
ICE)
M t
F-
C V. s•` - g`a CD -
}
dt
ag}
i
- - MT FU c~;t7 .
MEMORANDUM
T : ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
STEVE S LLIA , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JULY 1, 1983
RE: )ATCH PARK - LAKE TRAIL
BACKGROUND:
Berry Patch Park was acgcu i red E li 73 7,, f. W Hill Top als addition. (Park Service Section 2 .2.) , c, s ,el per was also responsible
for
installing a 5 foot bituminous trail. A portion of the trail goes along Berry
Ridge Pond, then goes between two homes following the shoreline, (with
dedicated park property) then back up to Berry Ridge Road; terminating at the
property line of Patrick Eagan Park.
ISSUE:
Without a controlled outlet the lake/pen oorn -onus ! eke, oootin ed to
rise above the established normal winter elevation. This wuL primarily during
the time period from 1981-86. Last year, a lift station was installed to
control the lake elevation. Pumping began in early spring to bring the lake
level back to it's planned level.
Because the water level increased without an outlet, the bituminous trail was
flooded as did a significant number of trees. The r , died and at the
neighbor's request, the Department removed the dead trcu iii kebruar.>> of this
year.
With the water level down to it's normal elevation the "aftermath" of the
flooded shoreline remains. The trail is in very poor condition and numerous
stumps and dead trees are exposed.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLAINTS.-
Adjacent property owners have voiced ng objections and concerns , i ,h the
conditions. A meeting with these residents was h ld in
that meeting, the neighbors adjacent to the park property asked that
consider raising the normal lake elevation to as high a level as nos ' 1e-
even if the park trail was again to be submerged.
Neighbors contend that the trail is not used and that no one wants the trail,
therefore, why keep it.
The engineering division has performed a review to determine if an increase in
the pond elevations - normal and high - could be done. Attached is o ari
report concerning this possibility.
OPTION #1:
Engineering Alternate #1 proposes to raise the no ;al water elevation fr-on
859,4 to 860.6. The high water elevation will remain at 865.2. The story c.
volume will be decreased by 8.2 acre feet. The lowest point in the existing
trail alignment is at an 861.5. This alternative places the normal water
level .9 feet below the lowest section of trail. The freeboard i > d :rersed
by 1.2 feet, therefore trail flooding will likely occur more, nl L er;t F
frequency storms. This alternative does allow fo,^ i i . :t'I nv r 3 o F he
existing derelict trail.
Staff recommends that the existing trail be removed and replaced. The
estimated cost for the trail improvement is $7,000.00. Also as a res=CHu of the
previous flooding, approximately 175 dead trees/stumps should be removed and
the shoreline improved. Staff estimates the cost at approximately $5,000.00.
OPTION #2:
Engineering Alternitiv r-"' rise the rig,
to 863.3. The h: tar elev tic. , F he i, . eased n tir
The storage volume w i l l be decreased by S . 2 acre i re L . 1 oi s rnat i vt 11
continuously inundate the existing shoreline trail secticn leaving, it
impassable. The result will be 2 existing spur trails that lie between the
homes leading to the flooded trail. This alternative does not allow for
pedestrian access to Mooney Lake and removes a primary trail lid, t. ",-trick
Eagan Park along Berry Ridge Road. In consider Lion to a1'l`.i.. ii~, 2 h
Commission will need to assess the value of 'E, me , LL ; ~ ~ al
resource and pedestrian trail. The ighborhood e~q;-;ao," .s than
minimal use. In contrast, possibl_ lack of use is based on tl c# EZ~ ~r rc
shoreland condition and unsafe trail. The trail access to Mooney La',,e w 'as a
Commission recommendation with the HillTop Addition. ImprE.:Avri rsts rou d be
necessary with Alternate#2. First, the dead trees and stumps ~Nould need to be
removed at a cost of $5,000.00 Second, the spur trails would n A to lre
removed and restored at a cost of approximately $1,800.00. L Pv, ter
flooding of shoreline trail section removes a link along the Esrrr ; 19F' Iaiu
pedestrian way to Patrick Ear— i Pr°k. A be it evard trail elI cck
placed north of the Berry -W F r s ` a i ngle family hr!i~ s ;t~ ~ iz~r i =ig
the interrupted trail link. Thy trail ed ition would cos i Ir irrtely
$7,000.00.
OPTION #3:
Option #3 is to maintain and keep he rcntrol wv ~ :r - e e , an .
water level as prescribed by the C . . 4 si of
trees/stumps would need to be remover t a coy a S `f 0,0' , wit , Y ,
trail would need to be removed and replaced at o"vf of ';f, >>0.00,
:
.SUMMARY
The adjacent neighbors to Mooney Lake wart l y to
raising the pond elevation. They do no F t r~ rema Y 3 to
the lake. They say the trail has no v 1 ue any 1 ts l i tt R s e . Need l o3 s; to
what alternative is chosen, the fact remains that a trunk r pond, parkland
and pedestrian trail needs to be improved. The dead trees and broken trail
are a result of an uncontrolled trunk storm sewer p-rd. With the
implementation of the lift station this flooding should l -,;CI r occur
protecting both the vegetation and trail. The Commissi(i,i onside°r "w a,
funding source is responsibly appropriate to correct th ~uation.
Staff concludes that, subject to the ' sion' ¢ ion, the
improvement could occur this fall in order t dour l i ~ a ace i n t o
operation the trail corridor if so recommended.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff is seeking direction from the Commission prior to i Lirlc,j with the
affected residents.
The Commission may consider the alternatives, as p rfesented in providing
direction:
1. To approve Option #1, Option #2, Option #3 or combination of the
above.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: JULY 1, 1988
RE: DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
The following is a listing of brief items in order to update the Commission on
activities within the department.
1. Staff has been busy preparing the 1989 budo t r r. in the City
Administrator's office by July 5th.
2. Focus Groups on the n ? 1 e CO i ale
have noticompleted drafty documents.
3. The City received notice of a claim for injuries as a result of a slid-
ing accident at Trapp Farm Park in December, 1987. City staff has no
record of a reported injury.
4 . The department has recd € 1 -everal 1 1 s ° o_, ; 11
Ridge Park asking - sty,,-o; tha; now. Staff had not planned for this ui._.l the fill ° f
1990, due to current work lc-' priorities for parks t1 t as-
sociated with existing neighborhoods.
5. Kids, Kids everywhere - Summer in the Park registrations have, I
900. Four buses were required to bring the 254 childrer ud leader to
Skateville for the first field '-rip of the summer. v or, ers
signed up for the Omni trip t" t the department sto,p c:o umy
bought out the theatre for o_.~ _wm .oco..
6. Registration numbers for all summer prcy~,:r;;~> are exciting. Staff have
spent literally days entering registrations into the computer, gener-
ating class list after class list.
7. Eaganettes will once again march in the July 4th r-rade. will t -,n
begin on the recital scheduled for July 28 it 7 1
100 children on the stage in Pilot Knob
many will be in the finale!
8. Water activities week is planned at the pl ayg ouods . I f you see water
balloons bursting, a tanker truck gently spraying and children running
through the "mist" or kids running with cups of water, intending to get
someone wet - it's all planned, fun, "cool-off activity.
1
9. The "morning site" experiment at Pilot Knob Park has proved to be a well
attended Summer in the Park site. The group is comfortable at +w --k
and frequently uses the trail to spend time on the olavground e(,
10. The softball season has thrE s 1
region tournament berths will 11 u
first week-end in August. Requests fc. a fall lep >>t k to
come in and that activitiy will be offered.
11. Domino's Team Tennis has been in progress for three weeks. FcL. t0 ,11111S
are enthusiastically participating. Onlookers ~avo begun inci;sire
about getting involved. Perhaps we will regroup Y, fa,,T l , i n ,l eau r c1
folks who wish to belong. Playing al 1 of tP. khe s a wrs
attention!
12. The July sessions of tennis and golf are about to begin. All golf
classes (twice as many sections offered than in previous years) are
filled.
13. Over 200 folks have come to Cedar Pond for the first t) Evenings iu
Park events. The Teddy Bear Band and Cinnamon S ' have W0Iq °~s
youngsters.
14. Reservations at the pavilion are bL --lidly or. r o -
tember. The shelter buildings Tr Blue Cro , : a~ Si} E ; rd
Quarry are also developing a pattern o, use. Picnic g' hurings °tquir-
ing a ballfield work very well at Quarry and Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
15. Bid opening for parks construction is July 12th, the latest bid opening
date for the department.
16. Bill Bradley, Department Assistant L ape c itect, s e lf-t the
department for a full-time positiun th the C-; l.y of i 'in Prairie.
Bill's last day was June 29th.
17. Grading work is being done at Heine Pond Park as part of the beuHracy
Ridge Development. Staff is attempting to negotiate additional site
development work with the contractor.
18. Maintenance staff have coml' installation Is at
Lakeside, Quarry, Blue Cross/Blr Shie:di -Mi-I r k . 1 a next
playgrounds to be tackled are Woodl a~ _L1 en- 0)" School.
Summer youth crews have been instal l i ig Lhe poriiilctecs a round these
structures.
19. New spectator bleachers were installed at the Goat Hill minor l;_agu,.
field, Rahn major, and small field at Rahn Park.
20. Park identification signs were installed at Wi f;«l Hill and t mth
Parks.
2
21. Staff have been busy with mid-season groc of i the zLh-
letic complexes. Infields at Goi._'.- !'ill Nosst' ' pd ~ ave I
regraded and sh ,o,i providing hi
rainfall has r:~ -t ...(,e Jiff. r it 1r~ 1F~ Ef,'4 old
playing surfaces this yep=.r.
22. The last of the seasonal maintenance staff began work on June 16th.
These part time workers are now assuming responsibility for three
groundsmaster mowing routes, two gangmowers, ballfield striping, refuse
maintenace, and miscellaneous tasks such as support to recreation
programs, construction of facilities, otlc.
23. Park attendants continue to c, mia H pan ran D, V c.c~s
at Rahn Athletic, Goat Hill=, No: th i c,,v any, f r apr Use
levels at Goat Hill and Trapp Farm are up strongly from last ear. In
June, 19 games were scheduled for the major and minor league fields at
Goat Hill with 24 reservations for pavilion/shelter use at Trapp Farm.
24. On June 13th, Dakota, Inc. began provi is C~n~; F orial s< s for
park shelter buildings. This fir? j_-
dividuals for repetitive h,aJlding and ?=;cs~ ie Ia, r~ in
t
both the private and pub! . :actor. 1
AII
routine cleaning of park shelter build ~qs and spring/±a.H~ cle"anups.
25. The planting of Carnelian Park, including all trees and nubs,
pleted in June. The biggest challenge facing the Forr _ry
has been the watering of trees planted within the last tree years.
drought has left topsoil dry to a depth of two to three feel'-, 1 h i
s~a>
required the use of both tanker trucks, almost daily, to k PC-, 1;.-
1000+ trees adequately watered.
26. Forestry staff have continued their manual inventory of trees, ay
completing inventories at Pilot Knob and Cedar Pond Parks.
27. This year's drought has left many of our newly developed parks starving
for moisture. Last year parks development placed six park in do--,,rant -rv seed. These parks include: Thorn s Lak-~ O'L ark. Nc- h a J(->''v
Park, Lakeside Park, Vienna I' n-1i=~ :~r s
planted in the fall of 1987,
germinate in the Spring of 198L. ih t, _ p kI H
of the recently seeded parkland. Th `it"! 4 assn , ,t th"- Situation
and intends to reseed these parks between August 15 and !r 15.
3
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: JUNE 28, 1988
RE: REPORT ON RECREATION, FACILITIES. [)ES' ` 01100
BACKGROUND
Steve Sullivan, replacing Tom Hedges, and I attended the Fat- 1 t e- ecigni
School in Colorado, during the period of June 20th to June .7731-11, ho ,c l
visited seven (7) community centers in th! Denver, Colorado 71ti.a, u of ;hich
had been completed within the last e (18) th period. The facilities
visited were:
1. The Commerce City Recreation Center, a 49,000 square foot facility,
which combined a swimming pool with a waterslide, sauna, gymnasium,
weight room, racquetball courts, running track, aerobic/dance room,
ceramic/arts and crafts area, tiny-tots and multi-purpose room, au;,r a
senior citizens wing and kitchen. This facility cost 4.5 M$
2. The En 1 e ood Recre opened in 1 5, of a gym-
nasium, swimming pool, running `:rack, racquetoall c(i «v., h room,
fitness room, sauna, multi-;.pur pose room, game .,oom w.id 1.e. This
55,600 square foot facility was completed in 1985, with construction
costs at approximately $62.00 a square foot.
3. Ft. Collins Edora Pool Ice Center. This 31,000 cquarr_ fc-, ',F-lity
opened in 1987. It features a 50 meter pool wa h try,`) k
I C:
heads, a separate wading and therapy pool,
ing rooms with kitchens, excercise any' it t in _ n, roow, Inc ons
area, seating for 1,000 spectators in eocn of the pools and ice arena.
Total costs of this facility, including construction, capital equipment,
concessions, office areas, fees, was 8.3M$.
4. The Greeley ecreation Center has over 100,000 ~u~ r e Pa
opened in late 1985. It has a swimming pool, two m ns .1?S, A € lass
room, racquetball courts, children's ro- mec in s,
steam rooms, jogging track, archery , rifle as )a;:.C for
boxing, karate, and wrestling room; as v:_!ll as a full size co t r_ial
kitchen. Administrative offices for the aepartment are also housed in
this facility. In addition, and currently under construction end near
completion, is a theatre at a cost of 9.$, in addition to the recrea-
tion center at 5.5M$.
1
5. The Loveland Hatfield-Cilson ereaionl5nir Center. This 67,000
sq.ft. facility opened in 1987, with a swimming pool and water slide,
two gynasiums, racquetball courts, weight rooms, aerobics area, elevated
jogging track, whirlpool, banquet rooms, and senior citize' is
facility was part of a campus complex with their City Hall
It cost 4.9M$. In addition, the City received a donation f 1
towards the senior citizens wing.
6. North Boulder Recreation Center. This facility originally opened in
1973, and had an additional construction in 1984. This facility now
consists of about 40,000 square feet, containing a gymnasium, swimming
pool, sauna, weight room, racquetball courts, and gymnastic center.
7. Westminister Re reatit i_ enter cs~
63feet. This facility f + _ t.
fountains, waterslide, . ,
....r~ tug
tion, the facility has a full size , awn= r un all courts, munity rooms with kitchen, tot area, arts and crafts facilities, etc.
This facility was also part of a full master plan, which included ath-
letic facilities, outdoor swimming pool, library, future fire station,
etc. Construction costs for this facility were $115 a square foot.
In addition to these seven (7) facilities, staff also reviewed t lie Facility at
North Glen, and an outdoor water park in the Highland Hil Park Di,t~rict.
OBSERVATION,---, '11JAL TRENDS
All of the facilities were of "high quality" in design and construction
materials. While each had separate programs, it was very clear that "quality
image for the community" was evident in each of the design procassec. These
recreation facilities were closer to private facilities both in =a,,aterials,
design and aesthetic settings.
A common trend for the centers was the "c anoc pt and d op-in program use".
For example, gymnasiums were not prop Sr ::.d for "outh/adult leagues to a very
extensive portion, preferring to leave the facilities open for drop-in-use.
This was true for other elements, including the swimming pools, which had very
few lesson offerings, almost no lap swim hours, nor special rental or use ar-
rangements. It would appear that on an average, only 25% to 35% of the
facility's available hours had programmed use.
Another trend observation was that all the faciliLl wv he--VV eve o qv -
nasiums as a central theme to their facilities en«,
inclusion of gymnastics as a major component. For exv -1, , Commerce Cit,,y had
constructed a gymnasium with two basketball courts and, had recently converted
one court to a gymnastics program almost exclusively.
The drop-in/open concept facility use also had an impact on the °wa.v fe: J
charges were made. While the ice arena facility at Ft. Collins had a s to
charge for its use, Commerce City had only c charge for the building th
use of all facilities. For example, At City Lion ent: ie
2
runni ~g
admission fee allowed you to swim, play racquetball, have use of t e
track and gym. The implications of this are that it reducEd tr, n~c,;_~rz of
control stations in the facilities for r`~er admission and f en,. On
the other hand, admission fees might be g<all" hiahr ut of having
use of all facilities. Fees were generally r t r 5` `x3.50 for
building entrance.
REVENUES
Facilities were capturing from 65% to 78% of their operating costs, with
revenues generated by the facility. The rem- ining operational costs. 4 from
the general fund transfers. Upon a closo' ex minat;,,., of the .anal
budget of two facilities that claimed to c,0, 15a t~ it wa.v oc ?shat
they failed to show charges against th Al for an,, liabi icy, ire or
comprehensive insurance. The capital imp, ver. it costs, janit r i s i cleaning
costs and janitorial salaries were omitted. The reason for this was the
building and janitorial costs were under the parks division, and insurance was
borne by the general fund for the entire City. Therefore, if these charges
were assessed against the building operation, as is typical in the
metropolitan Minneapolis, St. Paul area, the revenue capturing would be less
than the 70% claimed.
Concessions operations were notably less a hat h s en : pi-
cal ly encountered in the Minneapolis or Crncago a,eea. T. , e r e
towards that of providing it as a service, rather than as re4,~rouu~, ion
area. My impression is that these were overlooked, and c~_uld ha~1 bcerl maxi-
mized further in those facilites.
An interesting concept used by all the facilities is that = an 'rs side
card". At a cost of $2.00 - $5.00, a resident card wa,z -nh=ine FY~;
City. Upon adequate identification, you were issued a This
card entitles you to an a discount fee on recreation are 0 services,
including admission fees and season tickets. The cared works as follows: A
pool admission might be $3.00, but with resident card it is $2.50. Ap-
parently, the resident card was introduced several years ago by one of the
communities and has gained popularity and is now copied extensively. The
resident card is good for two to three years, and are renewable at a nominal
fee, usually $1.50. 1 spoke with several residents -<h`ho were uTtilizing the
card to determine their opinion, all of them agreed it ' fn=it an -
vantage for them. They saw it as a discount, :1 e~ e n r- qu a ng
non-residents to pay higher fees, helping to support tl lfac Hity.
STAFFING
Organization of the facilities department/management is distinctly different
than is typical in the metropolitan area. The programs remain entirely under
the recreation department, with the building management, having little control
on the operation. The recreation programs "rente,::r" he r pore trr:wi the
S-v ices
manager, and could be "bumped" for a higher priority use. a~ Cr
were under the parks division, and the park superinti t u~;; o sib i'or
providing direction for janitorial services and quality control . - ~r building
manager was responsible for the maintenance staff, which took care of issues
3
care of issues dealing with long and ~J 1, e idd c of the
facilities. It would appear that this type _a ,ee r ict
and may have been a result of past condition 6, 11i ap-
proach which would better organize the janitorial =rogr dg e t!":
manager, centralizing all the various areas within th department.
NEW UNANSWERED ISSUES
There were several issues that staff hoped to have r- or at 1 ast
clarified at the design school. M ,Jf these issue- eeJ ns,
However, others were raised, but n - only b,¢; ex-
ample, the issue of a clear span spate ui se f a c i 1 i ti : ~ use. of a
bar-joist roofing system. This is conoHHical, however, a. Lr-joist roof
structure in the swimming pool which uses chlorine results in vast stages of
rust and corrosion with the need for periodic and extensive maintenance. A
roof system using wood and concrete should really be reviewed for the Eagan
facility.
As was expected all the facilities visited i c , t: ia': c,f fac
storage had not been provided. Further, tat-', ser _ f t~
of the facilities and were encounter in<< g'( c ter c i:S L, eXH
This was surprising because several of the communi .its d h I co' ity
centers, albeit much smaller, and should have had a better reading of th+ com-
munity on use.
Water sanitation has been an issue that I have spent some time on. A typical
solution in the Minnesota area is chlorine gas, or chlorine U c udd and some
use of bromine. It is interesting to F is
utilizing the new ozone sanitation system whil-J" ' a v r1 = -
tem in the european countries. The Westminiist wl i s E s e U il! 1 i nt
ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide for `'h i t therapy Is, cl ai - -,i ng a ne
success in water quality.
There were other items brought to light, including a need for a statement of
interior design, a need for storage and cleaning of towels, view of cott.:l
mechanisms, traffic patterns within the facility, consideration of pool covers
and combination use of rooms.
The Director of Parks & Recreation in Plymouth and Cottage also at-
tended this facility school. This allowed for active/lively dis:G ers con-
cerning evaluations at each days end. Several rolls of slide film were, used
to capture these facilities; staff will be preparing a slide presentation and
comments for your reviewal. We believe these slides will visually orientate
you to exceptional facilities of which we can compare and learn from.
KV/bls
4
t...,
June 8, 193( )F ~ .H2
i"_'a `l, te Wells
Silas Kung
1352 C h t t ert.f`r Court
Ea an , MN 55123 and
Dear [vail.e and Sias; {
~ x g
it regards to your letter ' U May 's 31 ~ E"e.~arCAixs the Lit ~i 1 i z , L y and drainage
f le
easement. am oaf err°i ng thi s` otter to fib lam Cal hart , 0 , rector of Pub!
Word for detailed explanation. As to the Department of Parks and Recreation.
at the time o the review for the ~hattel"ti"in Ponds Addition, the Ae1V~~~ry
Parks and Recreation , m m v i ' , s I n discussed the feasibility o extending the
0f i,r,1nou; trait, new contained within the Hilltop Estates Addition and next the Mooney take, to the west and along the entire shore line/boundaries
of he
} Chat'.,'rtan Pond`. Addition. The intent being that this would provide a link to what would one day be a continuous loop completely around Moon
y Lake. C4
However, the Commission determined that such a trail world be very dlIftct t
and costly to do because of topography, pond elevation, property ownership and
loss of tree massing,
What was eventually agreed to by the Advisory Commission was to simply provide
a trail connection from Chatterton Court to the existing trail now in place,
i n e, t s' i was to be p l a c e d on € top of the utility a n d € r' < Ct # easement
re q,.1hod to handle s ton water from t h i s development to Mont Lake. ril
tact I would connect to the existing trail a ]owing res1den t;s of t hatter ion
Addition access to the park/lake area,.
I ree.a 1 t the developer was very concerned it.s~''s the location tof the trail
old
~^da was a in
{
wanting to minimize s the the amount of disruption - al.. ~nd tree loss. The City i
agreement with this. Rather than have a separate trail easement,, which is
often the ane with most developments, the City allowed the trail to be moved
from original t A.ei that o of being n top t of t m alignment o,i the drainage easement.
Again, in concert with the developer and with the i iit<ent of trying to reduce
and minimize Her lost.
The Department of Parks and Recreation did remove a number of dead trees along
h ut.H share of Mooney take t h i s past w i n t e r . T h i s was done at the request
of homeowners who had asked the City toremove many of the( dead trees,
Letters were .:nC. to affected property owners cdv.sing OEM EM of the pending work, instructing them to call if there were concerns or
objections. The
Department received none and proceeded with the dead tree removal. Because we
were`: deali n g with the directly affected property owners, who both re west ed
and were advised of the tree removal , it was Fe l t that the City was meeting
THE LONE OAK ME THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GC'OWIH IN OUR COMMUNIT'Y`
the concerns and wishes of park neighbors. We regret that this tree cutting
may have reduced the visual attractiveness of the park from your home
As you are aware, the City has met with the immediate residents of the park
and taken under consideration their suggestions for increasing the pond level.
Engineering has undertaken the review of pondinq area requi romr;3nts and a
number of alternatives that are anticipated to be reviewed in July.
If I can b of further as >1stance to you, please feel h me ct me
a g a i n .
Fn f rpi s
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks and Recreation
LV caii
cc Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works
Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
CITY OF EAGAN
-SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT
BOULDER CREST 2ND ADDITION
APPLICANT: MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 36
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 20, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning
of 18.8 Ag (agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single-family)
district and a Preliminary Plat for the Boulder Crest West
Addition consisting of forty-seven lots located along the south
side of Cliff Road between Highway 3 and the Inver Grc Heights
boarder. This proposal is in conformance with ' most
.:y
recent Land Use Plan that designates this area D-1, 0 - 3 units
per acre.
BACKGROUND
Meritor Development Corporation also submitted plans to the City
of Inver Grove Heights for the Boulder Crest East Addition
containing forty-nine (R-1 Eagan-size) lots on twenty-four gross
acres. The overall development would contain eighty-six lots all
above 12,000 sq. ft. and 85' wide at the setback line. The Inver
Grove Heights Planning Commission and City Council both denied
the project earlier this month, primarily due to the need for a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Rezoning to allow a
deviation from a five-acre minimum lot size in that area and the
policy issue of whether to extend the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) line. Sewer and water service as well as street
maintenance would be provided by the City of Eagan after a Joint
Powers Agreement is approved by both cities.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN
Currently there is a farmstead that sits on a high point near the
northwest corner of the 40+ acre tract of land. other than the
trees around the house and barn, the site is open grassland.
The site is surrounded by agriculturally-zoned parcels on all
sides except for the single-family Manor Lake Addition on the
west side of Highway 3. The Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and
I
Pacific Railroad is located between Highway 3 and the westernmost
property line.
The overall site plan proposed two accesses onto Cliff Road while
providing a stub to the south that could potentially make a
connection to Highway 3. The Boulder Crest West plan was
designed to allow a 2-1/2-acre lot size in Inver Grove Heights if
the urban lot sizes do not occur. The County is reluctant to
allow more than one access onto Cliff Road even though both City
staffs would like to pursue this option. The lots vary in size
from 12,090 sq. ft. to 39,370 sq. ft. with an average of
17,295 sq. ft.
G DINGED INAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The Development is props:ii
to grade the entire site except for a small ponding area in the
central portion of Block 2, easterly of the railroad right-of-,
way. The proposed grading plan shows cut areas of approximately
16 to 20 feet in the northerly portion of the site to a fill of
approximately 6' in the central portion adjacent to Inver Grove
Heights. The Development is proposing to grade in railroad and
County right-of-way. These areas of grading will require the
appropriate permits from the affected agency. All proposed
street grades are in accordance with City codes. A major conr°--~-n
with the grading plan as proposed is the compatibility with
adjacent property in Inver Grove Heights.
The Development is proposing to intercept all site generated
storm water runoff and convey it by an internal storm sewer
system into a ponding area in the area of Block 2 and into the
County right-of-way along the southerly side of Cliff Road. The
Development will be responsible for providing the appropriate
outlet to the proposed ponding area in the central portion of
Block 2. The ponding area and its outlet are consider-' to he
lateral systems and not a part of the City's trunk st ti.ec=
system.
A preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan was
submitted for staff review at this time. The following general
criteria were not addressed on the erosion control plan for the
Boulder Crest West Development. The following criteria need to
be addressed before a grading permit is issued or final plat
approval:
Sediment basin construction, timing of constru,_uct ion,
slope stabilization, utility construction, construction
access routes, and disposition and maintenance.
Runoff from the Boulder Crest West Development will flow north
and west through at least two ponds prior to discharging into
Pond LP-31 (Hay Lake). Pond LP-31 is a designated pollcling area
on the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond LP-
31 has been classified as a type 2 recreational water `'Do.-i° in the
Eagan Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan. The of
site development on the water quality of Pond LP-31 was estimated
through the use of the Walker model. According to the proposed
grading plan, 15 acres of Boulder Crest West Development will
drain into the proposed onsite pond located in Block 2. The
Walker Model indicates that providing 1.5 acre-feet of wet pond
volume in the proposed onsite pond will reduce phosphorus export
to predevelopment levels. In fact, this pond is large enr~)ugh to
treat the entire 22.5 acres of the Boulder Crest West a)svs_?opment
if 1.8 acre-feet of wet pond volume were provided.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service to serve the proposed
Development is not readily available at this time. The easterly
extension of the existing trunk sanitary sewer line along Cliff
Road is required prior to any Development being allowed east of
Highway 3.
Watermain service to serve the Boulder Crest West Development is
being provided through the Manor Lake Addition on the westerly
side of Trunk Highway 3.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The Development is proposing to take
street access from Cliff Road on the north, from a potential
entrance off of Trunk Highway 3 opposite the proposed Manor Lake
entrance on the souht and providing street access to the easterly
adjacent Inver Grove Heights in three separate locations. The
Development is proposed to be served internally by basically a
north/south roadway.
The City's traffic engineering consultant reviewed the site plan
and has offered the following comments:
1. The existing County and State Highway system is
adequate to accomodate projected traffic volumes from
the Development.
2. The Development should maximize the distance between
Trunk Highway 3 and the proposed northerly entrance
onto Cliff Road.
3. Although the proposed Cliff Road entrance is
approximately 400' from the intersection of Highway 3
and Cliff Road, any channelization that is introduced
at the Highway 3 intersection would reduce this access
point to a right turn in - right turn out only
operation. Since Trunk Highway 3 and Cliff Road are
both major roadways, there is a high probability of
needing channelization at some time in the future.
4. The proposed entrance location on Cliff Road is subject
to approval/negotiation by the County, City and the
Development.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The internal roadway system is
required to have 60'wide right-of-ways. The proposed 75' half
right-of-way for Cliff Road is sufficient to serve projected
needs for upgrade of Cliff Road.
The appropriate easements will be required for any public utility
which is constructed outside of the public right-of-way. A pond
easement will be required for the ponding area in the central
portion of Block 2 adjacent to Trunk Highway 3. A 30' slope
easement will be required along the northerly side of the
Development to accomodate future upgrading of Cliff Road. The
grading plan indicates that slope easements will be required from
the adjacent properties. The proposed discharging of site
generated runoff into the County road right-of-way is subject to
further review by the City and the County.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show the following pending
assessments of record:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
463 Street $23.63/ff 570 $13,469
520 Sanitary Sewer
Trunk 1,300/ac 23.2(.8) 24,700
520 Water Trunk 1,250/ac 23.2(.8) 23,750
463 Street 11.81/ff 85 1,004
TOTAL PENDING ASSESS ,"Al'INTS 2, 23
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final
plat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policy
#82-1:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
463 Street $14.41/ff 570 $ 8,214
323 Trunk Storm Sewer .056/sf 818,928
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $14,074
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
BOULDER CREST 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. The well and septic system for the farmstead shall be
abandoned to City specifications.
3. Council authorization of the installation of trunk watermain
sanitary sewer, and storm sewer to serve the area east of
Trunk Highway 3 are required prior to final plat approval.
4. The Development is required to modify proposed internal
watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer laterals as
necessitated by City trunk utility construction.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its flitional
obligations as defined in -'a staff's rej rt t n
accordance with the final plat _.i ;.sins and thy: rotas
in effect at the time of final plat _ pproval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
-.ts agar ,
g a
X j
Pro
,and
4aL )
1/ LI z>tC
pK A z
! w{ of
oi i
- i(w - ti!'a1y C~' i
s-JT
NlU
BOULDER CREST
WEST
y ,z
BOULDER CREST WEST BOULDER CREST EAST
Situ Location
r_- - _ -
a A a
77-
r r
r °ttt3
6i!®a
J, , y` r tr, r 1r, i ~
• I ~ ~ / r yr, a ~ ,fS Vac nuy- r ; ~ -
111111
f f , ~'w+ Dpi
77,
, ' y ! "~`.T'_t',°''.'/'~~, ~ ~ L,,,~'"""-~ Site Data Legand
_ ,I ~ "T:;' _ ''k'- ar. " y~^ I ° ....ri.•...a rcmTS wm... eac
X. 4
,.Nr l i , a p.a.c , : X - `'1 ; ~ u.rnaru» ¢t sa,r.,aT
- i//;// 're; ' reuo Ana,"9 0 6 yr «a- as»o
,i S ~ l t _ " 7, OO ~ , ! / ,1 I t]o¢T,•+ tu¢r, ~ xvx
. = p..,aux~, Kro '4x14\ \ ~,Ii ~.o woread H + . ~ , ,L - wu traw ,armor vx ~rss---r-o--~Y-~-
.rre a. ii ,r a.q NIT mn_r----^~-r-
+e =
r 1 ,T .--~5--,. ~ \ lm .r. uu¢a._s wr~r'.+a+ar
' r e K+.c z L Y
IV
%
L6Ei D6tSCYi ti
~..ra. r r.a+art rao v, am *.~n.
r --w w w_ - r
.w 77 -Z
r 1 Eap~~ , ® ® Ylvwr {kvxr It `n~ _ ,
f I{ F taw.t is ! S fg N
/j Jf ?
BOULDER CREffT WEST PREi-0{AWARY PLAT
pY
= = r_.rrT _ 14®rttlcx D®v®Iopmsnt Corp
cu ...~ru wd. rar.K .
g
Bu'ru'rLDER CREST
WEST
_ 4 r....o...aa r ~ .
/ wrr3-thmrw
BOULDER CREST WEST SO E.+,ST ..a ua d w
1 .
1(j M Q r ~
1 . t
{
WT BENT
~l cRtaa aesau
c~ t
t v
- a~.T` r" J' 6 r~`~ t I ' _ ~ - ?¢/j~.- - J a. t .ter a- ~ r
_ fin(
Al
L 1,
J T~ ~
f j
l C 4 w,vr 04 aY%
r 8: house srru
j// ` r..nssr a.w.r L.awr«.. %%ua xwa.sr r.. T:. .
i TY = vo . MALK 4ttx
AO ` LOOK OUT
^._s., .....m >v... 3 Merdcor ni C-arp. t 3ULD1 t WEST caR? C ,'JL -'3
ii
BOULDER CREST
WEST
BOULDER CREST WEST BOULDER CREST EAST
Site Location
Sit*
a , . , , ~ .fir. J J r~ ~-..r_ r- ? ri
t ~ i l
, r„ ~ o'~~~P'4?:~.If~ s S°' i _ ?F:°: t' .l a- - ti:_~
%
' site Data Lag and
t .gq~jf/ ti ~ ~ ~t ~ t f q.• ~ y '~~,.~"'r «.y - _ wr+~ a.«a .cwa rrraw tr
e i , 3~1 ° f:. 'sJ , : r t . - a.t ®.A..~. s aaao s.raa.~ w
,jh~ :':°'°t4'°'''•. ~ S+ .,'e}q. "ey°w
~ ~ . l e J & i. 8 ,a \ Mast awu tcs BF
~ "'x~ 3 ~`~f ° ' ?'h r4°"r. t E•:?~,r.;~ • • 1 ~l , " x i , ~ - l ~ , ~ orxnw ar u..
~ ~ ~ ~'rs r ,'q%, lI ~ ~ ~ ~Y ~ J,1 _ A ,l{~~a'~ ~ 7 ~ + ~ ~"a::' ~,Y- _ v._ . ur v ~ ~ tee.
y 'r, i , t 1. f.. °.i , . 1 ...ice;'?.:p~^al~:''. y "•e ' ! ! r'r, 77 / _ im u v rxa -
Z r, y+ O¢ ° xV +fp . i / ,J' - , , - _ m**w tc.r~ x,ow. .rs+®~a*vrr+a~r arts----+--«-
' °;..~t a' JC• sj. + , ti''~.~/' p 'r'h -w` 5 ara ~n ur +w u, nwr -
%i ti. i ?:':?::a J f,: 4 R' ,a r a. .sw rsa.u ate"
C , ,1 / A t~ 4oi? tt~`V;tiet ti ; ; j .'e t * L r'~ _ ' r } ` a r + - - iw u ur tr*r
a. ' e i ,p;i~4bJ •t J ;i}.':;-l• ` 1 p
/,f k rt q y}`{x 1
r w~ ~~Y t ' ` P s Jr }ia . r°: t. ? i' ( s t - Legal D ascription
1 • q°•°t"• _ ` tw wa r w c
rnVa ,.:y,~:.,
= btaritor 4rv*scs'- err Corp, BOULDER CREST WEST PRELUSENARY PLAT r
an 11 TREET IMPROVEMENTS - 570 F.F. TRUNK STORM SEWER 18.8 A --_:S
-91 9.LP -2
~b 1
9/59
LP-28
910°(7 /
91J5.V
t •s
aes
_
LP T25
LP-26
924.7 ~
9270 //920.2 92.3.6 ~rf
LP- 27
92 2.0
925.4
Dco9
TZ°{E
925.3 rn
9.30.0
G u 1Y rl
PA. %
.
Fri
city of eagan approved: stz r and
17,A' PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMEN
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
VARIANCE
(TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COM .
LOCATION: OUTLOT A, TOWN CENTRE 70 9TH ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 21, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted ra
Preliminary Plat for the Town Centre 70 10th `.-ddition,
Conditional Use Permits to allow a car wash and motor Luel sales
in a CSC (community shopping center) district, and a setback
Variance of 20' for the gasoline pump island canopy. The site is
located on outlot A, Town Centre 70 9th Addition between Highway
35E and Town Centre Drive. Outlot A consists of 2.48 acres in
the area between the auto mall and the recently final-platted 9th
Addition (Pizza Hut). The proposed car wash facility is on the
southern 1.91 acres (lot 1) with the remaining .56 acres being
platted as an outlot.
SITE PLAN
is site is flat, open grassland and falls .rapidly, towards
Highway 35E from the back of the parking lot/drive lane curb.
One divided access serves this facility that will be operated by
the Mermaid Car Wash chain. All building and parking setbacks
meet Code requirements except for the two-pump islan`- Dpy
adjacent to the 35E property line. Code requires a 50' ,a k;
30' is proposed. Eighteen 10'-wide parking stalls are pro'iided
on the Town Centre Drive side of the building for employee use.
The proposed pylon sign is consistent with the Town Centre sign
agreement.
The building itself contains 16,322 sq. ft. or 19.3% of the
entire lot; 30% is permitted in CSC districts. The exterior
finish of the one-story flattopped roof facility is concrete
block or rock face block, grey/brown in color.
Since this site is perched above Highway 35E, the freeway
corridor image is a concern. Landscape plant material should be
consistent in size and species with the auto mall facility to
provide an overall continuity in the area.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was
previously rough graded as a part of the Town Centre Development.
Minimal site grading is required for site development and site
drainage is planned to be intercepted internally and conveyed by
a storm sewer to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive.
The existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive is of sufficient
capacity to handle the runoff generated by the site development.
The development is required to provide a minimum of a 3 CFS
outlet to the northerly adjacent proposed Outlot A.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for review as
a part of this application. The storm water from this site is
conveyed by a storm sewer to Pond JP-66 and then to Fish Lake.
Several erosion and sediment control practices will be required
to minimize sediment transport to the storm sewer and the
receiving water bodies. No site development will be allowed
until an appropriate erosion and sediment control plan is
submitted, reviewed, and approved by staff.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to
serve this site is readily available in Town Centre Drive. A 6"
sanitary sewer service has been provided to the property line.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily
available in Town Centre Drive. The Development proposes to take
its water main service from the existing water service stub
provided. Sufficient fire hydrant protection was provided as a
part of the Town Centre Development.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the site is taken directly
from Town Centre Drive. A proposed 30' wide ingress and a 30'
wide egress driveway are proposed.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way for
Town Centre Drive was provided with the platting of the Town
Centre Development. The appropriate storm sewer easement is
required for the storm sewer line which is providing an outlet to
the northerly adjacent outlot.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with the special assessment policies
in effect at the time of the platting of Town Centre 70 Addition,
the proposed parcel has been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk,
water trunk and water availability charge under Project #58 and
storm sewer trunk under Project #429.
A search of City records show the following 1 e-i,1i : g ass.. r_ Ys
of record:
PROJ# DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
443 Storm sewer 5,910/ac 4.3289 $25,412
easement
519 Street Lights 4,021
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS $29,433
In accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this
time, the following assessments are proposed as a condition of
final plat approval:
PROJ# DESCRIPTION RATE QUAN1'
429 Storm Sewer Lateral $2,458/ac. 1.95 $ 4,793
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 4,793
The proposed assessment reflects a change in the City's special
assessment policy. In the past, lateral assessments w=dry -,ased
on the construction of laterals to the property's boundar,,: Lather
than to the City's trunk system. The current policy is to base
the lateral assessment on the cost to reach the trunk system.
The proposed assessment is the pro rated share of the total cost
of the Town Centre Development's storm sewer lateral connection
to the City trunk system.
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
.quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, C2, C4, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot.
3. Outlot A will share the access for the car wash facility.
4. The Development is required to provide a 3 CFS storm sewer
outlet to serve the northerly adjacent proposed Outlot A.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional >ment
obligations as defined in the staff'sd t in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and _h fates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of- ay
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or f ally
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
:included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
BtJARRY ARK
COy,
MAN
e-
r
R-i
EB
LB: T41 $I
1( (sl
lo-
t ~ wcr, tFCt -
y try F _
a y fa«
}
too
128.E
GROUND SIGN L
\ of a rHYfD7 tHpfisr-0Tfi :^4cz=vas^Y•d • I
~ ~ ~ tt\\\,\ ,t r< JS~
Ya ~ Yt>®4r* r ~ , rte`' -
YIT VBA~OUf IAViM® 1 ~ j~~ OyDfA. ~ A.'i, J
YY
Y kq .a
r trT.ACt EM.. f 9 S a t i afrf o, ~s~rf~\ ~f PYLON SIGN
r <Y~
4,t p
NCl4tlD d. A.H NOO ' ~ ~
` co Nc DE 7E C-PIH0
~V a, o i V ~ 309 /f/
- <uPIOY!! rArriNO ~
.OD F."OYff ENTRANCE \ f -i PAAO. 8r6N
® +I T UUI11005 PAYING-- K y
~~w•.`•w ~fR ryQ , • t YA RFI......ACK Lu
SITE PLAN tt ^ ~,ITY MAP ~ ~ - +rDYNO <rDN
SirE ,tr<t ~I,T3331 Sq. Fr. \ w
1J5A
P. lr<<n 1272.11 fr. _ -~ciTE rit
T.W k.nd6g ..c.: 13321.5 Sc Pe.
%.Tnat
T.,.I p<rw4e..~le .rc.s 23,351 Sq. Ft.
T.W P.r tulit: it Srilb
e }unwr Af» LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
Olt Common ft- f,e "-I IwttoM
f vetoaAaa a}Rrh 1P}uC#
g a r<~h A,} r 1} 1 r I. la~..,.Yrf t~*i.. AI •ppia s m a} / A
SS f•t...h (.n«n ixr'rrt+ t } t `uy
le_ i rpr4~r~Crta 'e x..crrm. x t r
( t~l # fhrnf«sa ]
R 1 tr Gid.n Atu~4 s...qs 1 P.~t R r?
Is S
All-
To CsrcYya. A~sw fwAwrrp V}. *i »t, iT hPlT xfh aota Tr MnhrRt P F„Y j' h ~x~ t Ci"a'
emo..- *.Pt. -vcs
t / apt At 'r 4
7 \ ¢aa t3 rrn!„9 t„orr C«+Al
' ~ Y) YUwPtR 44 AR iAU¢ C„RhhT
a>~ 1~ G~nTH 9
f Ook¢R„ tract hohrtt¢R
t A`~\ \
fR Tr ACA thrf J t CDteh+t¢a ¢NR[M tihtrCR
~~ttf~ ` ! i 1toMPACx A»e aican ch.rte hhY v~f. ~ / 'ti..1/ ~ _
. #6jath MO£AD11A»ar t., ~ _ *.'Ia' ~
i PA¢ow ¢o¢rto¢
.Toth t,¢»
hOCA MUIYt..
~ . ~ J ~ ~ ! f R COtORS00 tlREEM }nhUCF U
bath rexxc» _ ~ 1 s ¢otoe. uoc.en.reat
C„mRif LIAL ~~~J } rT PURPtC IxAP rAtr¢ C„tBhT rf g
It COMPACT AMRh1CA» CAA»4444Y YA t}~ ~~.rn' ' s h+ne~«¢ a
tu. ' ~ y. ~ a •f-f eYeach IL
tf aat¢Rl MocAO6Ah¢r ¢ rR~cA~"~~~`~, }rp- - ~ fj ~
#T»O*„etii COCh0PUn „Aw Y„Oh0R J ~`--'T
{ Ai YLAh11„¢ art A„¢
IOCf MutTt» r hap ihtl k40h
LANDSCAPE PLAN R ¢otm„ Mtc,tArh¢e
R ~ - ~ tn,_vn i~t»
POC0 MvLYC„' \ R
li
1 >unYtR tRrR .r»n e„,„P. ' ~ t
{j( sI Y.
c{ ° . j~~{p ~t \ ` \ a \ \1`•. T\ '"moo. \ \ ``Y `\"'m v}
+4 ~ ~y rnw µw~'~} V S
jJ' r +a.'.~•. "'fi:.j,,,• °'v4 `.l p+ .w terucc
LLI
14
GRADING, UTIUTiES, ERO PLAtj
-
---E;iI TINA CONTOUR; g ' (Y} tk`
--t ' MEW CONTOURt I ¢ 'may \ ui~l
0
FAOSION FENCE
I i ~m u
~ z
i ~ .tea b
a
„x
y
j ry
1 C7 g
j ~ I
!
A
m
y, N
HIMQN 9
i ? ~ twit
m
A
4
'X
r av - ~ ~
cy
_°o ~ 'yam 7I
~ i m I t I~
I'
y ~ i ,I
I ~ ~m
_ it \~1
11 ~ i! rn a
I v1. C a
w
yi
i iI
'i ~ ~ ~ - r
4
i i
' -n E AID CAR WASH
..r 1 Ft.D MA SETA r.....
~ 1"' jl
ELI
1
x II -i--
r! t. L L E 1 rl
\
• 1t SPO$ $ i ~
e u
! I - 'i 'ter- 2
,ray
' I Y _ t
7, 7777ljF'!;-
rr
17
y I_ ti z 3 1 a
& 11 3
T, T, T7
IF7F
1 'CI MERMAID CAR WASH
eri Jt^ ~
J/ fr~\ Jam, f ~ wl \ ~ ~ L
SAS ~ A
our
LOT A
Al'
via ss a
7c .ea 7
Ou rc,OT
Q 84-1,
$ AN 218?'[ ~ ® °a
OUTLOT
x~xh ~x
LOT I ~ ^'1a 1
BLOCK ao
5"„gEha Y ;~,e t r, t L 021-10
STORM SEWER LATERAL - 1.95 ACRES
„1Jf,
7.8 874.8 L.S.-7
8
V I .7
-PI
DP-2O ' p-r
901.0
DP- 2 904,
893.0 DP-
011 882
697 6
C 1 M
UP-66 890.0 871 L '849~'
880.0 12 DP-
r '
fl 4 y s 892
T'i
.}JP 1 I',.isfi ..t~
1 L . _x...871'.0
880 1369.8
7 6 j p 9 0
U P
893. 15
895.
Y CV
i t 811-4.0 1 1 J i.lF 8 8 nIG? 16~
844:Q.. i f J I I
815, 7
830.0
I'r > j(.'~ is !Tau f:.
crry
_.14 iwUt 7~~~~1~ -i • r...?
HALL g":.
SUBJECT PARCEL.
FIG
city approved: standard
PUBLIC plate
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMEN
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN -VENT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ENUM NT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
(ALL SAINTS LUTHE7A CHURCH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: VANMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
LOCATION: 1/4 OF SECTION 23
EXISTING ZONING: R-l (WITHIN THE LEXINGTON _D)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 20, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted L ,_g a ing
of 3.85 (R-i single-family) acres within the Lexington South
Planned Development to a PF (public facilities) district and a
Preliminary Plat for the All Saints Lutheran Church Addition.
This site is located at the southeast intersection of Lexington
Avenue and Wescott Road. The City's most recent Land Use Plan
designates this area D-II; therefore, an Amendment will. be
necessary.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN
Currently this site is open, flat grassland void of any
significant vegetation. Existing homes within the Lexington
Square Addition abut this site on the south and on the east. One
access point onto Wescott Road will serve the 160-seat church
building. Ample expansion area is available to the east as well
as parking lot area to the south. Code requires one parking
stall per each 3-1/2 seats based upon capacity. Forty-five
l0'-wide stalls are required and seventy-nine will be provided
with the first phase of construction. All Code building and
parking setbacks have been adhered to. The scale of the building
relates nicely to the adjacent single-family homes. It has a
one-story brick exterior with clean, gabled roof lines. The
proposed landscape plan addresses the City's main concern of
screening the parking lot area from Wescott Road and the
residential area. The 6'-tall Colorado blue spruce will be
planted with the first phase of construction. Staff recc~:~°~ erx,s
adding overstory deciduous material throughout the site,
especially along Wescott Road where no trees are proposed. A 6'-
tall berm will be constructed along the southern property line
and seeded immediately. The parking lot expansion area will end
at that point.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was
previously rough graded and does not require excessive grading to
accomplish the proposed first floor building elevation of
approximately 898.25. The proposed 898.25 elevation is
approximately 2 feet below the future Lexington Avenue grade
immediately west of the building and approximately 3-1/2 feet
lower than the existing grades for Wescott Road immediately north
of the proposed building. The proposed grading plan around the
church building itself has the potential for the building
trapping water along its north side. The grading plan should be
revised to reflect drainage swales which will carry the water
away from the building. This drainage can be directed to the
parking lot area where the Development is proposing to intercept
the site generated runoff in an internal storm sewer system and
convey this runoff to the proposed City storm sewer system. The
proposed City storm sewer system is presently being constructed
under Project #527. An additional catch basin is required in the
southwest corner of the parking lot.
An erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted as a part
of this application. The Development is required to an erosion
and sediment control plan for review and approval by staff prior
to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and
depth to serve this site is readily available from the existing
sanitary sewer along the common lot line between Lots 5 and 6,
Block 1 of Lexington Square, 1st Addition. The Development will
be required to construct a manhole at the northerly terminus of
this sanitary sewer service stub.
Watermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve
this Development is readily available from the existing watermain
located along the northerly side of Wescott Road. A 6" water
service has been provided to the southerly right-of-way line of
Wescott Road.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The Development is proposing to take
street access from northerly adjacent Wescott Road in one
location which is approximately 40' south of its northerly
property line. No access to Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) is
proposed. The Dakota County Plat Commission will be requiring
dedication of restricted access along the westerly adjacent
Lexington Avenue.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The proposed 60' half right-of-
way for Lexington Avenue is in accordance with current Dakota
County right-of-way requirements. The Development is proposing
to dedicate a 50' half right-of-way for Wescott Road. This 50'
half right-of-way dedication is in accordance with City policy
and standards.
Dakota County will be requiring an additional 20' slope easement,
to facilitate the proposed 1989 reconstruction of Lexington
Avenue. The City will be requiring a 10' permanent and an
additional 15' temporary construction easement for the proposed
construction of the storm sewer along the southerly boundary of
the Development under Project #527.
The grading plan indicates that no slope easements will be
required from the adjacent properties.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: City records show the following pending assessment
of record:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
527 Storm Sewer Lateral .2111/sf 80,500 $16,994
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $16,994
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final
plat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policy
#82-1:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
401 Storm Sewer Upgrade .027/sf 130,682 $ 3,528
467 Trailway $13.00/ff 748 9,724
467 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer Trunk 10.05/ff 205 2,060
450 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer Trunk 30.88/ff 386.5 11,935
531 Street-Lexington Ave. 48.05/ff 311.5 14,968
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $42,215
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantites and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with
the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. Any signage over 7' tall shall require a Conditional Use Permit.
3. Revise grading plan to provide drainage swales to minimize
the potential for trapping runoff along the northerly side
of the proposed building.
4. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest
corner of the proposed parking area.
5. The Development is required to construct a manhole at the
northerly terminus of the sanitary sewer line provided to
serve the site.
6. The Development is required to provide a 20 foot slope
easement along Lexington Avenue for future upgrading.
7. The Development is required to provide a 10 foot wide
permanent and an additional 15 foot wide temporary
construction easement along the southerly plat boundary.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all t~ ~<<:~crary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
c~ w
3
3 i
N
PARK
OOL
v} - a
a~ c -r
D R y E
/ l ra0f[1MYtgr
i °6../ PARIS
PATRWCX
U
xx ~I
k~ E = 2~t A iA A
I i a i}s xt$ ® a >5
$ A dy 1}s ~rar I4' 3 :s'izia~a3~M
ax 'f1F a _ .i
~0. 38V-I GS N 01~td1X3 °I if s
9 401 t. I"
t _ ®'f aars¢ s _N -
179-rCII Z. .'.s..•..._. •.2A.??.N /1 _ t I
t i
t f A ~Illf'4fi
.t > t t i
~t f tt-' t } ( f i i 1 z7
!I Jt t f f 1 i C5 f 1 Z
a li~~~ i t k
r 1 r f I' I / 1 I
I €i i f a\ o Y'' if
1°! I ~~w f ( Ci. s
it IL b
I NI
L ~ 1 f . it" ! ® J 1° a ti\\"` ~ t ,.ti 1 1 ~•s ~.~,~~ti
r
` - -t- - - -
~i''~Iy`=`)) ; t-• t\ i /~.f".. ac *c:'~.. ~a® a.rcc.~r.+s a \ A„/s 1 1 1 5 f 1 ~ t ~ i
111 0
4 t `t _ -4~0 P! i ;e N -L-L 13S3M
- \
ig i~ f a
y ~ r ~P!°• '
~ Ga^.>.~t =.ov^S 1 i e'a4 HbiH v9' t-.'-w•a_`a cr~°e~.J:.._
w ~9
i
r>"
a 71
i I I r.a I ( G
t i
~ ) r
t ~ + M1
r i
C S
4-44
y ~ \
:~f`~1R ~Va1=5'aS
}i a
S t~ 3
X
i~ I! t
I3
t}:
Ir
c y I ,
1
I ;
jil
„III ~ it ~
I
i! I
rd^cS r _ _ SCOTT
14 d Y k j r S 03
I9 I 20 21
3 'tip ~ J9 t6 ,v
17 o • i ai
:0:pesaa:aaWOa:
• yt
10
d E5 23 f i~, m rv
9 - - 5 --..1040 4
6 110/ , 7501
rn A TS
0
° S a 4'00' 00 t
_ _ - ••1 12'_ - X03 aim
wnweszlr 544L1p i 14 12 13
;e wry ~~,y
053.06 05
I 1 ~ ~ ,~6
4F 34 a,& I~ N 87°0
325 4c "t`?* ,~~r x rv C E 1 I
Po-60
a. 31V%5 05 t ~y 22 s
n N rt 12
--o4 2
tai ® w r`~ sa4'~d S0 c ) s 89000 cd [
4r
a40a) 130
8000
0a Iba._ ISO 25 25 'K oAOU__.x L__--_-
8!L l a R SAVANNAH
USAVANNAH ROAD
160. vs 29 319 i3$. 70 7ra 25 25 137 70
LOO
5i S 1.31 l.r.90
100.09 '2 2 2
~ a>''4° ao ~o'ode s avat'e
,}y i37.n is0.'r ,Q d 41.03
a. N• 1_. °4K1tj 0Cf t 3 ! ~l
`j ( 3s. s•
w
~i ov aUq
t1f 4 4 21
ar}r+er'N(f. I sav°oo'od't ' t -3 UP;Y
LATERAL BENEFIT STORM TRUNK - 205 F.F.
STORM SEWER UPGRADE - 3.00 ACRES
WESCOTT
.d® 14 1 3G. ! _ 7502 9.03
-'o e
rs =
le 19 20 21
ac 44 t ~f n ~n
oc6-23 17 1 o,h
N 8
s a4'bU oo'c s 5 79 7 5
4 72
p ti W
Z5 I I 10
so- vod 0 do
rY u,
54 04
C Y9430. 15 Ho/ 7501
h 40 75
3 19b0' OD t
153-79
t1S 721.22 "3 `u 63 m
o - N rurvr5 sz ~t 394 14 12 13
ody
^ 4 e 33.16 L 4r 05 75
dr~grrS r
1 •q, e{~ 47 s1 13 P n e7°5o'
42
1.1 dp ~ 1, 4/.~9 • ~ 1 8M00' OJ' LS . - rv
P,.60 n 5
• i.3B0'M303 rv~i32 69.22
w ~ n j . ~7m
p \ n ~~MM C.
2
A W M°. 189.94 3
. .NN
791.._..._. d _ 3 a(
_ CE q• m W'°
as
o ^ya , nt 130 25 31 3M -
rv v zl 96 r ! 75
I®~
W aa39' 9 a o'oo'c $
t+3t 9*e`fi) 130 139.04
d'~ ItiW1 ti 2 ~,,ti
b O p .ti`. 0 1`e ~ ,N
m! I99 fa 2s 29 130 23 231~
t±Z sm9' 9' e. ~z! _ R SAVANNAH _
USAVA H ROAD
s 6,~ 2YA
66.9v 23 25 131.10 136.79 23 25 137.70
3, ff-A 34 awoorv 319bdoo'e.
X93
139. 31 IU.51
161.19 14299 7500.
12 2 Y 2 D 2
99!as !99•o0'odc I~ 3eu•ao'od'e I -
' dirt 136. a1 .Q 14i ~s• 3 22
J v 3
a~od od [
® 111.61 CID 1 239. 31 8 ` ,arr
^Jl J s. I 172?r 7b ~1
a_ _ _>runr erooo y
4 4 < F cra
• 6 as° c. 3 a1~o'od'c ~ rte' JW A U f~Y
IIIIUIIII{III2Illi{IIIIII LATERAL BENEFIT ST R M TR K 386.5 F.F.
;T STREET IMPROVEMENTS - LEXINGTON AVENUE 311.50 F.F.
WESCOTTu
~ arc. J2~ t~03 V
14
20 6
4 ~ M
nt O
134 72"3 ga. ,
- Id p ~ m vi`
i .nti r
23 Xs
av°odod[ I 1 4 ,ti 10
r 34 Oa
lo/ 7501
rb- F O 75
12 13
ti ~ ~3s.#a ( n7 09
f y, ~
® MQ is 1~9 529.42 I\ t i
' ~ ~ i , ~a2z
t•xlvr900
~ n 7 e I i
17
-1 30
75
3 Wit - #s~s r~ s #ro0'0O [ ~3' ( 13 BGPC~ ~1', ;
5M( o ~ J
~Y4` (nti• 1 1
10 let" Zs~ 0 IE#t! 25 25 _ sev° _~33t_ _ _ Y SdVA{JNAN -
2SAVANNAH ROAD
M ,04W 33 ZS ISa 70.....E 23"",, -ru
4:
Sd 8 't smrodo0'C
513# ISa. SO i?T.1# 429D (3C?P
la®.'! y
X' ~9y
#~!ss'~ • # a`odc t B
b ~ s •!*~tM'~- b#s°odOtfC ~ , 3 rl
127. t? 1 33. 3a g ?79°Cb'm.~'• t '
47- <
r V ~ ~ aavar` c. 'od'c I-r ar LksaGl F3 U F Y
_ TRAIL - 748 F.F.
893 0 888. /
' 895 5
1 892.3
851•, !fib` ti`?~tU N iv x&3.5 12
L.S.- !
C 2°
899.7 JP32
885
90®..7
JP-11
~ .
815.7 J 4
830.0 890.7
_ 895.7
U
J.- h
CZ)
.
8208
8.30.0 1 8 f
r .
t t,Ps r
JP-49 818.1
830.0
P~ ;C
818.7
830.0 6
Cl, \ H
12, j- d
J P- 314
SUBJECT PARCEL
1
city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: standard
PUBLIC plate 4:
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
REZONING
PRELIMINARY PLAT
(RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: AUSTIN COMPANIES
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS)
RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 21, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND G
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning
of 5.6 LB (limited business) and 11.2 RB (roadside bu:~'~~
acres to a commercial Planned Development district, and a
Preliminary Plat for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. This ^ite is
located between Rahn Road and Highway 35E along the south side of
Cliff Road. The uses proposed for this develr.;?_:® are
consistent with the existing zoning districts. The Planned
Development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the
overall development at this time as opposed to individual
requests on each lot. Also, architectural landscaping and
signage compatibility will be addressed with this plat. Even
though the uses are consistent with the existing ial
zoning, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be nece:: Ly.
SITE PLAN
This site is very flat and highly visible from Highway 35E.
There is no significant vegetation to be concerned with. Access
will be primarily from the previously constructed Rahn Cliff
Court with two secondary drives connecting to Rahn Road. S')tred_
parking areas provide 832 stalls, well above the amount rec._.ired
by Code (730 - 815). The following is a breakdown of c f~':d u-,-ea
and proposed use.
Lot 1, block 1 (1.1 acres) 7,000 SF Bank
Lot 2, block 1 (1.1 acres) 11,200 SF Retail
Outlot A (2.7 acres) 20,000 SF Retail (possibly 2 bldgs)
Lot 1, block 2 (3.8 acres) 50,000 SF Multi-level (1-3 pries)
office with 6+ cci lor-
ground parking
Outlot B (1.8 acres) 12,000 SF Retail
Outlot C ( .8 acres) 5,000 SF Restaurant
Lot 1, block 3 ( .8 acres) 3,500 SF Fast-food (Burger King)
Lot 2, block 3 (1.4 acres) 10,000 SF Retail
Lot 3, block 3 (3.3 acres), 18,400 SF Retail
Detailed site plans have been submitted for the office building;
lot 2, block-1; and lot 3, block 3. for City approval at this
time. All lots and outlots will require site plan review and
approval by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council
before any construction occurs. All building and parking
setbacks meet Code requirements except for the 10' drive-lane
setback (20' is required) along Cliff Road, the 17' parking
setback (20' is required) along Highway 35E, and the 30' building
setback (50' is required) along the highway for the office
building. No separate action is necessary for these deviations
if the site plans are approved due to the Planned Development
zoning. The extensive landscaping proposed along those areas
screens the parking area nicely and there is no parking proposed
between the office building and the highway. The overall
landscape plan for the sixteen acres is very well done. The
plant material selection, proposed spacing, and quantities will
visually tie the development together. Additional evergreens
will be added along the highway to provide year-round color.
Almost all of the sizes are above City requirements.
The buildings will be constructed on all sides with light and
dark brick, accented with rock-faced block or stucco and metal
canopies. All trash areas will be contained within the buildings
except for the fast-food restaurant which will have it next to
the building and made of the same materials.
An overall sign plan was submitted requesting two 30'-.tall
development signs located at the entry points along Cliff and
Rahn Roads and six 7'-tall monument signs located throughout the
site. They are architecturally compatible with each other as
well as with the buildings; however, they should be reduced to
the 27'- maximum height allowed by Code. Individual tenant pylon
signs have been proposed in three locations.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The pro>o: cite has
previously rough graded and minimal site gradi:g is required for
site development.
The Development is proposing to intercept all internal site
generated storm water runoff and convey it to the existing City
storm sewer system. A detailed analysis of the proposed internal
parking lot storm sewer system was not performed at this time,
but the following general requirements should be noted:
1. No direct connection to the existing 21" stor
along the south side of Cliff Road will be all-
2. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer
line along the westerly side of I-35E will be allowed.
3. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of
storm water runoff which it can discharge directly 4_-to
the existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff at the northeasterly corner of the Development -r-id
flows into Pond AP-42. All remaining site generated
runoff must be routed through Pond AP-44 prior to
discharge into the existing City storm sewer system.
4. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for
Pond AP-44 will be allowed.
5. The Development will be responsi-le for rerouting the
existing storm sewer system i;,.Cliff Court which
discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer along the
westerly side of I-35E. The runoff from this area is
required to drain into Pond AP-44.
A major water resource for this site is the impact of development
on the water quality of Cliff Lake (Pond AP-11). Cliff Lake has
been classified as a. Type 2 recreational water body in the Eagan
Preliminary Water Quality Plan. The potential impacts on Cliff
Lake were estimated using models developed by William Walker, Jr.
The proposed land use and increase in impervious area resulting
from site development will increase the phosphorus loading to
Cliff Lake by approximately 30 pounds. The Development will be
required to reduce phosphorus runoff into Cliff Lake to
predevelopment levels. There are two options available to reduce
the impacts of site development on the water quality of Cliff
Lake.
1. Constructing two 0.4 acre ponds, each with 1.0 acre
feet of storage onsite will reduce phosphorus runoff into
Cliff Lake to approximately predevelopment levels.
2. Increasing the wet pond volume on Pond AP-42 to
approximately 4.3 acre feet and increasing the wet pond
volume of Pond AP-44.2 by approximately 1 acre foot will
also reduce phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake to
predevelopment levels.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for
staff review at this time. The following erosion and sediment
control practices are needed to be implemented during the
building phase and shown on the appropriate grading, drainage and
erosion control plan prior to any site development:
1. Storm sewer inlet filters in depressional areas and
other appropriate locations.
2. Silt fence along portions of Rahn Cliff Court.
3. Gravel access pads to minimize tracking onto Rahn Cliff
Court.
4. Stabilization of the slope along Pond AP-44.2.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and
depth to serve the Development is readily available from the
existing sanitary sewer line in Rahn Cliff Court.
Watermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve
this Development is readily available from the existing
watermains in Rahn Road, Rahn Cliff Court, and from the existing
16" trunk watermain which crosses a site in the area of proposed
Outlot B.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Improved public street access to
serve the Development is readily available from Rahn Road and
Rahn Cliff Court. A limited access (right in - right out) onto
Cliff Road was constructed with the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. The
existing limited access presents traffic enforcement problems.
This entrance will either be required to be closed and all
internal traffic circulation directed to Rahn Cliff Court, or the
median in Cliff Road extended westerly to close the "attempted
full access" maneuver which is presently causing traffic
circulation enforcement problems along Cliff Road.
All entrances into parking areas from public street right-of-way
and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to
be 30' wide. All internal parking lot major driving aisles are
required to be 30' wide also. The proposed internal parking lot
circulation maneuvers are subject a detail review by the City's
traffic engineering consultant.
The City's traffic engineering consultant has reviewed the site
plan for the proposed Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. Based on the uses
and the square footages of the buildings shown on the proposed
site plan, approximately 7,750 trips on an average week day will
result. Of this projected 7,750 trips per day, approximately 555
will be outbound and approximately 320 will be inbound in the
evening rush hour. As a part of the analysis for the City of
Eagan's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, it was assumed that
there would be some retail development in the area and that it
would probably generate approximately 2,400 vehicle trips per
day. The Development as proposed is approximately 3 times the
traffic generator as previously assumed.
The additional daily traffic will put an additional burden on the
intersection of Cliff and Rahn Road. Virtually all the traffic
from the Development will utilitze the Cliff and Rahn Road
intersection. Only about 200 vehicles per day are anticipated to
use the existing right in-right out off of Cliff Road. The
intersection of Rahn Road and Cliff Road is scheduled for
reconstruction in 1988 as a result of the proposed Cliff Lake
Centre Development. The additional traffic from the south will
create capacity problems beyond what was originally anticipated
in the proposed Cliff and Rahn Road intersection construction.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The Dakota County Plat
Commission met on May 23, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat
of Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. The plat is adjacent to County State
Aid Highway #32 (Cliff Road) and is, therefore, subject to Dakota
County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. After a review of the plat it
was a concensus of opinion of the Plat Commission that said plat
does agree with the provisions of the ordinance. Restricted
access will be required to be rededicated on the final plat as
per the Rahn Cliff lst Addition.
No additional right-of-way requirements are identified for Cliff
Road, Rahn Road or Rahn Cliff Court.
The Development is responsible for dedicating all appropriate
cross easements for traffic circulation, utility easements for
watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer as necessitated by
depth, and the appropriate drainage and utility easement as
required to accomodate the necessary storage volume for Pond AP-
44.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS A search of City records show that there are no
pending assessments of record and the following assessments are
proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with
City Special Assessment Policy No. 82-1:
PROJ DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
370 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer $30.88 1,124 ff $34,709
254 Lateral Benefit
Sanitary Sewer 15.85 559 ff 8,860
370 Water Service 1,012
316 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer 61.75 844 if 52,117
316 Lateral Benefit
Trunk Sanitary
Sewer 6.08 528 f 3,210
Future Cliff Road 111.70 530 ff 59,201
Future Cliff Road
Trailway 13.00 530 ff 6,890
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $165,999
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions on the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
period of five years.
3. Lot 2, block 1; lot 1, block 2; and lot 3, block 3 be
approved at this time. All other lots and outlot vil1 be
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission an:a city
Council.
4. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the
site plan shall be approved. A 27"-maximum height shall be
adhered to.
5. All trash shall be contained within t~;._a. ildings except for
the fast-food facility on lot 1, block 3.
6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the
adjacent roads or Highway 35E.
7. The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as
exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988.
8. The Development is required to revise the prop<:.:,<.~;a aatermain
design. The proposed design interconnects 2 different
pressure zones.
9. The Development isrequired to limit phosphorus loadings to
Cliff Lake to pre-development levels.
10. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm sewer al_,
the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed.
11. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer line
along the westerly side of I-35E will be allowed.
12. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm
water runoff which it can discharge directly into the
existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the
northeasterly corner of the Development and flows into Pond
AP-42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed
through Pond AP-44 prior to discharge into the existing City
storm sewer system.
13. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the
existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court wwrhich
discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer alor: the
westerly side of I-35E. The runoff from this ;tei is
required to drain into Pond AP-44.
14. No encroachment below the 918 nigh water elevation for Pond
AP-44 will be allowed.
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS:
15. All entrances into parking areas from public street right-
of-way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are
required to be 30 feet wide minimum.
16. The Development is responsible for its proportionate share
of any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the
intensity of the proposed development as identified by the
City and County.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional
obligations as defined in the staff's rep)rt in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Riqhts-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1, This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
1 ~
F t
tVV/ pr
co
s 1
IAHiRI
r~r ' fs~ R-t
NATO"
t I,
l rG ~1} nos!
n4 DAKOTA'
Dt1M
!t RAAif -
COUNTY STATE AID WY XO
I CL IFF ROAO4
s- r \
h
O
l r r
m r 1
r l
m 1 { \
wANNCO_IF COURT
r--®--_ _ \N \ 7
r-I \ s \
®r ( \ \ rO
® 1 ` ca
t J M
w t I j `tl
Ili' j c F, / G
co f _ l f
L------ -----1 r `r ° 1!
-,t
R.NN CLIFF COURT o 1
I \
\ 0 9
\ w / -O
\ off. / x
l r-® d \ >
l ~f
I /
/ B pIp
? bin 6SPP' P C
N .62.x.69 5 \ t I i r
k~S KlSK6RFfb V ttt lu j_- 0 ° O
o s ~ "1- -
RHracL'FF zrv® AaaiTioN
s i ' o FPLANNERS M` James 1l1f It 1C.
EA6 AN, YK PRELIMINAR Sy PLAT
=r ! ENGINEERS I SURVEYOR
CLIOF- ROAD
!40.60
r rr-r ri-i Tl" 1 Tr-i TT. rT i ri-i r- -T i-rr rr r T1"4 - -r-i T"1 M 84 9P' 21 ` C
11i110°ilsca°sei U I U 11111 IIB llllllllllt
1r i°r.
J( LLIIUI
p I f( f'! r
A
r }1(i~Iili~ilfll~l!i
r
(~jl (d.l H IIIIII n il(~II
i III! II~iHWj I11 - I
O
j (IIIIE>~Iif III ~ I
atT
ll?fI~IIIIII ~I
li
IIP bill c lw~ -
t lliljllll 1 .
A-A
d 2 g F 'J
® 1j}}}}} .g yrs.
% . a g o
' B `b«F1ot 4f 6hi{Ay
WT M ci2S'R IN R .xiCHITECTS WTIQN« 4 r
a g{ o e6H NGL°qL IFF P LA rT,~ PLAI x James R. F I I ' inc °a le" R1hTED - NNERS / ENG N s
MfYl4AT!}i Ar11W11 M _ v t
° - as. ~MO.W0f:6 A4~R a 0.~•..,-p.,..•'9 aa6. ib.
CLIFF ROAD _ - - <
I 1
a n r Y
~F _fyP v
Jill
.1, co .1
J ®r
a,' -0 zi
11.
40
"L _
67
°zr a ~ r a 7 ~
W t•-~ j tzz~i i:'TEag j~a
/ tC
~ ~ d d} t r I r / - s a:sac«°_:. z: s :r v
4 l ~ a a E y .3 F3
( {;,,1 ~rl la I I I I ~ sa = a t-.- ! ~ -
~ N' j i . f ~ •Si.t F,xE pEp E tF,o ash crs ~aszc 'S _
~ ra f lc3x ::z® 1 .E~a s3 izza3.i E°'i
I') 1 r f t«q _ 3 z_t f. E;tS. ~i
1 ~ ci aE%~ ea_i i I ts~ ca-r € ae%' t. .y
i' f tc t is i a i ',a c% zaxD~ zt . y
1 I I 7 t ~f zttE tx ! s r .3 x~ t55 F:rc Ii A
~A tii a8
2-
I~ ~ aN °ia;: fi ~ jjaE zk I^1 °:ssR ys _ t
/ j.. ~ K ~ $ l f~a ccc, $ zE~ z I~E zl FE s._i is
~ ~ fL~a 1 ~ ~ t"t I ! S` ; - _ t E a~: ~ z I ~x Liz Stt~
~ ty t! ® ci tae i' i E®= t -
~Q ce t&.carc = o %°a~ F Q g •F ~ It'r
t ae-w R
! a a
N 1 r s
MUM! R R -R t R q - R R R 999 '
- K~KKKRKKKK.Y. `_f'T E s`-~k s
RarlNCQAk xPLnza a es tllf Ii~1C.
f i " - - - RAGA!(, w_ _
o °k LU3«> w PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PLANNERS/ ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
° 01. AUSTIN Buhr, _ .
CLIFF ADAC_
1 ~ i 1 ~ ea c-~..
IN,
II1} - -ter
I 6A
~~k 111!111! ~~(t~ !i}.I IIItI !'''iiiiip
1""- i~ 1 1 1 I ~ i I I I I 1 9 I I 1 ~ MA I I I r' ~ _
~E`'* 11t}1~ it'~~ 11~I 1iI (I I`a~II T
al ~ 1 1 L~ I~I I I I I ( (~I
I a E
T sc
s;PQas~
N
KkKKKKFKFK & x = • m
RAHNCLIFF PLAZA
EAG-, dames R
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
, PLANNERS
W, AUS'TM 9t TH
. sus r.. »..nra..n.x.,,z x. o. r.4 ss.e< _ A--. Wr.s •vE:.a
Wx
~-nP
1 00
(C)
:-a, O b x' m c o w 1I-
j1
CP
m m ( m -i 'L7
r- 10
m a` IA
n
iTI,
{~J7 0
Oy
O t 8.
W ~ W
a o -
I Ec
I~r~. o a , K -
11_
y lry .q
R ih NI M ati
s a
c x r
ao
n2
t _ =
a R~
x ~w
-I M
I C d1 m
t° A ! 'o a N
A. a
O Q
D 'n
S pw
a t ¢
9 Y dot
_b p gy
i ~h M
n
C a
~ -ems
p
It
fit
ry~ y n
N r ;I
V -i K
44
aIm ~ ~
of C °
1Q
LELIA
f O °
nx
R~ ~S
RAVINCLIFF PLAZA LOT 1' BLOCK
EAGAN, r~~INraESOTA ~
SAU1 ON/ rill KU3
ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
OAAE ROWLOCK ®RICK >t
TYL r i~
U T ARICK
L~J
?T1T( fTTTTTLF A
MI TAL PANEL METAL PANEL PILA67EHS
OFFICE NORTH ELEVATION
7 E
- 2i~ I L
ELffi
OFFICE SOUTH ELEVATION }lEtA4 PANEL
171,
7, flil
L IZT ZTLIZ! I nTLII I =LL-LT -
/ ' T JD ~mifTTTJ TTf ~ F 4, -
METAL PANEL META` PANEL
OFFICE EAST ELEVATION OFFICE WEST ELEVATION I
co,
RD. (CUFF ROAD)
F
°DISJpMAY[D ACt[ffiS'r~ tt ~ - >
99 (y i _ry ~'MFPOWP r - Stx
.K MOXiw ~ s, pF i
® I! LOT f wits CM' r»g Mw..a OF SAC. St \ +J.
^b OUTLOT 0
C~t X/
2 R N '~~iF~l' COURT V ~ •irit%t
M KPpp'OP"
r
oI( A
z
OUrLOT A 1 z 1A
~ ~~o o J 4 PARCEL
3A
,wsru OT
,RAHNCLIFF
COURT,;
s•rrc~q ,srK ~y
N 4
OUrLOr
xx • / f
ins ~ a_~•
~ 'con cr P++[ w w cv rr,r ++w rn[ s r. St aj t ~rf xPf{/ 'IJ
r7 -
x+rr'Ww
Lu
lea n ~ : I ~~C t
~A 'fcc
41
iM ee ~ e~+x . _
d }
PARCEL ST ro a ( '
a-:
WATER SERVICE
CLIFF ROAD FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS 530 F.F.
1w _ CO RD. (CUFF ROAD)
°Pl&G aA9tA KGtll°s•A• m~' ~ - _
I. V Arowr RO PO [r a'tr
PF iK NPRra tlaa PF i!
III LOT / LI , arln or rnt awv -1 "C,34 RAHNafr COURT&
O o `t » t+7
OUTLOT A u 6 a "e v
j
a~ c PARCEL ]a
CA'r IC S'£ }SR.M - ~{3~17' ~ P'"rt ~ P
>RAHNCLIFFCOURT,
t RmooaY ,p :
a r~ f
OUTLOT g
q
tY y Jv
CJ ~wuaa.c l urtlrr ralt~arh f/ 1 011 - 27
..:CM PO rw_-W rw N.W l~C.k 1/
t
14 00
01
tom. N KC 4'
RiR ll• 'SY 1,(,
Iasa .~i - ° I'7
~ ~ 4 ~ ,x 1 1+'~ ?~'~r ~u~cr Q / f
IM 114 ~r y~ ~ Tj~
4 aau ?o ma ue la
!1 a~ R awdl
PARCEL 37 -/lot Ia/.s1 Ia,A r~ ) R 1a rm
{ dt` ws a as
as t~~ 4 ~ No 1 ~ i
LATERAL BENEFIT STORM SEWER- 1 124 F.F.
LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK FOR SAN. SEWER - 559 F.F.
co, PD, nAD)
t"' DESO *TtO SCCItt np I'mo' - -
I^ y ~'4 ?O [ So 90 iE[T S'LY
V Of ipq MORTn t~tq of T? ~ROJ_
LOT j S~ Nw rfa c' raE rr va of t__.tt
a ( $ C
I f
m r oYt
taa ta~ vt
OUTLOT 0
s;2;4I ?V r T Cot :
OUTLOT A
,f
P~ r
I%1
PARCEL 3C
R,wnxYOd yd"o~- 1 0 y4/
<o"
-naz !I
.Y. e•~rer"E a.wt Y
RA HNCL,IFF COURT.,; F'.
+o, :vm
ti.
f c~ N ~O4 ff//
Y I ourLor gl
rJ
0~ 'y
ct~ ~+.aww' . urt,Trr EatEwr~ • Ott _ 2 J
i iq I c-xwn.r-wof n+r-ui ~s c.u / '
« I o eur-zs .t n r rr' afs f
U) 4,4
~1. ~ s I f,~ r
L,J
4. 04
4 Ea?S i] a0 +
V'jWj__j2E 44
PARCEL 2 E ~o a e J4,
dd \
CLIFF ROAD - TRAIL 530 F.F.
LATERAL BENEFIT FOR STORM SEWER-844 F.F.
LATERAL BENEFIT FOR SANITARY SEWER -528 F.F.
,
H) IVER
.{j' J ( s ~r / Y `ems
1E51
EN T
r 7
RiDGECE!F 77
A0DIT!CN `1~\t
W-s
f1)r
15 f
it 57~1;
r I f 4 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tom.. ~ h- • '
~,r f^ Y
DAKOTA couNTY RK
C-C
Est,~r
J
c i t y SUBJECT PARCEL
of eagan ' 1 approved: standard
y PUBLIC plate
~ - ~ WORKS MASTER DE PARTMEN
rjf 9lt
E 8 5 / l f C LE4FfVj
, M-1
E3 P "11 2
;86.0 _
42
2
94.0 89.5,0 ~~926.C7'~
92 7. 4-,
77
912.1
19.33.9:
AT
in,
IJ -A L)
9083i
922,'0 F t`tlR
924';
/ I SAEa
AP- 17
926.0
LP-59 4G? DAKOTA COUNTY PA rC
893,3
jr7 0 -Y 900.0 1
SA ;mA-xx 4 4 887.
897.
ES A~
A-zz
SUBJECT PARCEL
I
city STORM SEWER approved: standard
T plate
'UBLIC
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
-DEPARTMENT,