08/04/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
MEMO T : ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
ATE: AUGUST I, 1988
R: GUST 4TH ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
The Advisory Commission will be leaving City Hall at 6:30 P.". f'ar' of
three (3) park sites, including Winkler Jackson, Thomas L-~ nc! V n ds,
Parks. The regular meeting will commence at 7:30 P.M. z'. tl La 3:= pa1
Center.
The first item of business, after the approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of July 7th, and the joint meeting with the City Council on May 26th,
will be to make two presentations to department employees who have worked in
the "Summer in the Park" program for the last ten years. Dorothy Peterson,
Recreation Supervisor, will be making the presentation.
CONSENT AGENDA
There are six items under the Consent Agenda for Commission reviewal. A
separate memorandum has been prepared for these six items.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
There are two items under "Development Proposals" - the Highviea Park. Addition
and the Wescott Square Addition. A separate memorandum has buc)n propared for
each. The Wescott Square Addition was tabled by the Planning ,~n'1~111SSem, pith
several park concerns unable to be answered at that time. A though review
of the staff's memorandum pertaining to parks in this service section will
help the Advisory Commission to make it's recommendation to the Planning
Commission.
OLD BUSINESS
There are three items under "Old Business". The first item, Mooney Lake/Berry
Patch Park was reviewed by the Commission at it's July !,meeting. A new
memorandum and attachments have been provided for your resit.„'val . Again, there
is a significant amount of information to absorb and understand with this
particular item. Staff will make a brief presentation, and residents of the
neighborhood will be present to state their case concerning the Mooney Lake
issue. A brief letter from the residents is enclosed. The other two items
under items under "Old Business" concern park names and Blackhawk Park. The
park names will require Commission approval before advancing to the City
Council.
Blackhawk Park has three separate issues which have peen tied tn;ether as an
update. Staff would like to review each of these items with the Advisory
Commission for additional direction.
1
E BUSINESS
Dorothy Peterson and Paula Nowariak will be present at the r, ieeting
to present a verbal report on the summer playgrounds. staff is
very pleased with this year's program and the response that i c~~:nrur~ity has
shown.
At the Commission's request, Staff has prepared a brief memorandum on water
management and water quality. John Barton, of the Dakota County Soil & Water
Conservation District, will be present to elaborate on inforrn~,ation and
specifics of a water quality management study and what steps are ho-', rg taken
to mitigate the impacts of development on City parks and ponds.
The final item under "New Business" is a South Oaks sanitary sewn rect.
Residents of South Oaks neighborhood have petitioned the City to install a
sanitary sewer in this addition. In order to complete this line, it will be
necessary for a sewer project to be constructed through South Oaks Park.
Staff has reviewed with the consulting engineering firm the possibility of
several alternative alignments and would like to review with the Commission
two of the most logical alignments for this project.
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
There are four items under "Parks Development" which the Commission will be
updated on. On the third item "Heine Pond Park", staff will be asking the
Commission the authorization to work with the grading contractor of the
residential site/park, trail, etc. Regarding Rahn Park - staff will be
reviewing with the Commission the roadway/parking alignment at it's final
designation, and requesting authorization to initiate an irrigation project
for the four fields off Nichols Road.
CMU ITY CENTER UPDATE
Staff has prepared a brief memorandum with attachments concerning the design
charette with Hastings & Chivetta Arcitects. This memorandum is self-
explanatory, as are the attachments,
OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS
There are several items under this section of the agenda fori.hrx ii S:') ion's
attention; a printout of the "Happenings", and the "Bond Fund" have been
provided. I felt the Commission would find the attachments interesting, as
well as the letter from residents.
As always, if you are unable to attend the Advisory Commission meeting, please
contact the department secretary. If for any reason you can't ~~)~ake the tour,
but will be available for the regular meeting, we would a~,pr, ciate knowing
this as well.
Respectfully submitted,
r~
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation
KV/bls
AGENDA
ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGA MINNESOTA
Thursday, August 4, 1988
6:30 P.M.
Eagan Municipal Center
A. 6:30 P.M. Tour of Winkler Jackson, Thomas Lake and Vienna Woods Parks
B. 7:30 P.M. Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center
C. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
D. Approval of Agenda
E. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 7, 1988
Approval of Minutes of Joint Meeting of May 26, 1988
F. Awards for 10 Years of Service
G. Consent Agenda
(1) Conditional Use Permit - Yocum Oil Co.
(2) Galaxie Cliff Plaza - Cliff Plaza Partnership
Waiver of Plat - Vincent J. Kennedy
Woodlands 2nd Addition - Robert Engstrom Co.
Suncrest Addition - m. Huttner
(6) Seneca Plant Add. - Metropolitan Waste Control C()rnt
H. Development Proposals
(1) Highview Park Addition - Mildred S. Hanson
(2) esteott Square Add. - New Horizon Homes
I. Old Business
(1) Mooney Lake - Berry Patch Park
(2) Park Names
(3) Blackhawk Park - Land Acquisition
- Leo Murphy
- MnDot Resolution
J. New Business
(1) Summer Playground Report
(2) Policy on Water Management
South Oaks Sanitary Sewer Project
K. Parks Development
(1) 7-1 - Thomas Lake Park
(2) 88-7 - Ohmann/Winkler Jackson ::r- d i Bridge P K_I C 1,Cact
(3) Heine Pond Park
(4) Rahn Park - Play Equipment, Roadway Parking, lii-ga4 un
L. Community Center Update - Results of first Design Charette with Hastings
and Chivetta
M. Other Business and Reports
(1) Happenings
(2) Bond Fund Print Out
Summary of Neighborhood Park ping
Brochures: Trails-Tennis
Replacement for Dave Hennes
Historical Committee
(7) Communications
(8) Other
Subject to a roval
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING F
THE ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AG , MINNESOTA
JULY , 1988
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission was
called to order at 7:35 P.M. on Thursday, July 7, 1988 with the following
Commission Members present: Dick Carroll, Michele Swanson,ayne Sames, Sandy
Masin,George Kubik, JoAnne Alt and Bob Porter. Staff present included
Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect/Parks Pianner,
Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLinde; ~ it ion ~'C V
Dorothy Peterson and Parks Secretary, Cherryl Mesko.
AGENDA
Chairman Carroll requested that updates on Blackhawk Park-South Access,
Small Lakes Management Grant Program, Sitko traveling concession approval, and
portable stage be added under "New Business". With these additions, B(,b
Porter moved, Wayne Sames seconded, with all members voting in favor to accept
the agenda as amended.
MINUTES 1 , 1981:= MEETING
Dick Carroll moved, JoAnn Alt sc-onded, with all members voting in favor
to accept the minutes of the June 2, 1988 meeting as presented.
CONSENT AGENDA
The following consent agenda items were presented ft I .7 . On a
motion by George Kubik, seconded by Bob Porter, with all ,U~
favor, the Commission approved r ~ionendation to the Ci~ C'ni ;f' the
following items:
1. BOULDER CREST WEST ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash
parkland dedication and an eight (8) foot wide bituminous trail be
placed along the south side of Cliff Road.
2. ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURL" ADDITION - That
waived for the church 1 futuir,~>E
will be subject to a c;,sh p- -.1 wll dedication. cl ~ 1
install a five (5) foot wid- sidewalk along the e:st side of
Lexington Road.
. TOWN CENTRE 70 TENTH ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a
cash parkland dedication.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1988 Meeting
Page
R,AHN/CLIFF - 2 '1DD1T1
Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan rev._ or the Commission the b'-Mc lk r°ou d
of the proposed development noting thav it's southern property lira is
directly adjacent to the northerly unimproved section of Vienna Woods Park.
The development is proposing to use the ponding area, referenced as AP-44,
within Vienna Woods Park for storm water retention. Since the existing
ponding basin will not provide adequate storage for this proposal it would
result in the improvement of an < pterly i- -ea with th ^ is k. The
existing improved basin area cII s ~ [i`i , -1 vol-, I y
disrupting the park layout. Th-_ s ond, m-_ , asin ty
grading, thus provide adequate storage capacity fo:° the watersh ar i. This
would include raising the high water level in both basins one foot which wouI d
have no significant impact to the park. The basin could be engineered as a
dry pond, wetland or wet pond depending upon what the Commission's
recommendations are.
Member Kubik asked what the Comer a Storm -aid a
for regarding this area. Steve Sul 1 i v i irAed by F ng twai
called for this area to drain into AP-44. r,.an Carroll noted t' _t agc!
63 of the packet the master storm sewer plan -Is shown. He also noted t", it
seems as though the parkland becomes the area for accumulating storm s;=wer
run-off. The impervious portion of the development has no green space
resulting in the run-off from parking lots going directly into AP-44. Mr.
Carroll stated that this run-off should be caught and filtered bef-,i a it runs
into the ponding area and expressed his concern about the City aiE-; the
storm water run-off from a parking lot area withoL'_ it first being tithe. 1.
Sandy Masin asked if the run-off can be fil ed ~ it goes i===s~
improved ponding area. Steve Sullivan responded by stating that envir ital
manholes can filter sedimentation however there would need to be some research
done to see if it was feasible to filter gasoline or oil out.
Bob Porter reminded the Commission of the LeMay Lake problem anc! noted
that they should seriously be looking at the possibility o. "sses,-i-g the
developers for the cost of filtering the run-off t f i t e r t s t: °~a
water ponding area. Dick Carroll stated that the s Iuuid
stand up for the principal of keeping the parks in good p-, arils' that
developers of commercial property should provide clean run-off to pond
property. Further, they should foot the bill for providing filtration so that
chemicals do not permeate the soils and affect the wildlife.
Wayne Sames asked if it was known from the beginning tha
possibility existed for the storm sewer run-off to accuw la' In this atr
Steve Sullivan noted that it had bees cart of the s a rsome time, however, it wasn't known a', 4- the exact s#.or
Sames then asked if the City could the developer to F__ py0bido a
holding pond on their property beft"I-I the run-off is allowed to cnt .E° ~,he park
ponding areas. Mr.Sullivan suggested the use of environmental manholes to
mitigate the flow of unfiltered run-off into the ponding areas.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes for July 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 3
George Kubik expressed his concern for water quality. He stated that
this should be a requirement of developers; that the water entering our storm
sewer ponding areas should be clean and free of contaminants such as gasoline
and oil. Bob Porter suggested formulating an overall st<-In dard poi icy
regarding acceptable run-off into p - ks and residential areas. S-u1,,, n
noted that as the caretakers of - werty for the City of ata
not careful to make sure the I l i ty is protected, 1 d it for
the City.
George Kubik moved to direct Staff to provide a draft of policy
regarding runoff into parkland for all classes of developers which is to be
reviewed by the Commission at the August meeting. Sandy Masin seconder:; tl14'
motion with all members voting in favor.
Dick Carroll moved, George Kubik with all ~ x, 'I I
favor to insist on filtration prior to ter run-of,' ~ o ,7s,~ to <ark
property. The developer to do grading and stockpile alone rite:-=y.- LLf
35E and the normal cash parkland dedication would be required ii` or Rom i~F
2nd Addition.
G ARK REPRESENTATIVES
Mel Bailey, Parks Intern, brought the Comr_ scion up tt park
representative program. To date there are 1 H rs who h acv- v u,nteered to
represent their neighborhood park. A meeting ..ill be tht, end of
July or the first of August to bring the representatives and review
the purpose of this program.
George Kubik suggested showing some slides of 1_h_ id?.;,,i g dWIK3
noting what the plans are for each one. Dick Carroll ,-J, ~Jf
park development would be beneficial to the reprezpn-: how much time would be involved in the 1 4~'nt;, 1
plan was to have them very informal and 6 :,,:nth i v -Cs ~J1 ly.
Dick Carroll noted that he would be attending the meeting scheduled for
Monday, July 25th, and asked for other volunteers from the Commission to
attend. Michele Swanson agreed to participate and George Kubik stated he,
too, would try to be there. Chairman Carroll thanked Mel Bailey for the work
in getting this program up and operational suggesting that everyone try to
attend if they can.
hACKHAWK PARK - SCL J r K
Steve Sullivan noted for the Commission that, additional design work was
being done and that trees that would be saved had been identified. Dick
Carroll asked if there were further negotiations and Director Vraa stated that
a meeting was being scheduled with all parties involved in the access issue.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 4
SMALL LAKES MAA GRANT iff
John VonDeLinde has submitted the grant appi e0-i 3rv
lakes the Commission recommended. The applications 1 :1 wnu
Superintendent VonDeLinde hopes to have a response to the Commis<i 1 ither in
August or September.
TRAVEL CONCESSIONS - R. SIT
Recreation Supervisor Dorothy Peterson shared ~ s~~«
everything had gone smoothly W. the approval of Mw.
~
traveling concession. The r 11 approved the V" 1~ t e n r, or
modifications in the Commissic„,'s recommendations. e' 1 b im
issued and Mr. Sitko can begin his business shortly. Sup( ..,v;sor P Ler._1r
noted that Mr. Sitko had been very complimentary of the Commission, C n<:il
and Staff for their handling of his request.
PORTABLE STAGE
Director Vraa stated that Lai lle and ill spl`r P 4 z a
portable stage. He will continuo vorking with -ville e 1 a c=
neighboring communities to see if they want to p- ticipate. <d cin only
communities splitting the cost, the cost per community is appr ;imately
- $4,200 each.
FACILITIES REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
Kathy Dybi ec was introduced to the Commi ssi o--- r ,'r n 11, en dee
John VonDeLinde. Kathy has been an intern for t' ment S21
t e
March and has been involved in such projects as i ;ip ~ t txe a i led
inventory of the buildings, participating in the Arbor Ca; ar.- tree sale
events, completing research for the focus groups for the community Center,
being involved with the Trust Fund project, just to mention a few. Her
assistance to the Parks Department has been invaluable.
Kathy outlined for the Commission th = noose f th€ Raj
Replacement Program which is to serve as i 1
park facilities and con ,x ;s which r capi. in "Ii U
relatively permanent nature. Kathy noted _y some of the faca1i "sat
covered in this report include park lighte,,g, backstops, hockey risks I
fencing, park buildings, play structures, and irrigation systems. Kathy's
research included talking with vendors and staff involved with original
installation of these items and is based on replacement with an equal product.
She also noted that this was only a guideline for future repla,..,-=-'-- of
several park features.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes o July 7, 1988 Meeting
Page
In preparing this report Kathy noted that this prc d, b e
considered a necessary element of the City's efforts to retain -he ~ES:e_p €t
of parks facilities including their functional, safety and aesthe'Lic
characteristics. Kathy thanked Parks Staff for their assistance in helping
her research this information.
Chairman Carroll thanked Kathy for a~i excell
Commission's appreciation for the detailtul rc.I
very beneficial to the City for years to cntlno.
BERRY RIDGE PATCH PARK
Director Vraa reviewed Berry Ridge Patch Par' s ~u; i,
exists regarding the trail along Mooney bake for - r~1,i
Mooney bake did not have a controlled outlet it 't .N !S
normal elevation necessitating the installation of a lif i n ts~ FE~: .~2
lake level back to it's planned level. During the high water 1revels of I"coney
bake the 5 foot bituminous trail was flooded as were a significant number of
trees. Now that the water level is back to it's established normal elevation
the damaged trail and many dead trees and stumps are exposed. At a meeting
with the neighbors they expressed their concerns with the area indicating ¢.'.ax
would like to have the pond elevation increased and the trail abandomed .
Tom Colbert, Director of Public Woncc, ririresfir' the wti - ion
regarding the review that was performed to do ne i;
pond elevations - normal and high - could be done. th u,
alternatives presented for consideration.
Alternative #1 proposed to raise the normal water elevation 85-) .
to 860.6. This alternative places the normal water level .9 feet lbet, ow the
lowest section of trail, therefore trail flooding will likely occur more ot'ten
with higher frequency storms. This alternative allows for the imprei* - --_nt of
the existing derelict trail.
Alternative #2 proposed to raise the normal water level frc n 85' 9.4 to
863.3. This alternative will continuously inundate the existing shoreline
trail section leaving it impassable. This flooding removes a link along the
Berry Ridge Road pedestrian way to Patrick Eagan Park. A boulevard trail
would need to be placed north of the Berry Ridge Road along the single family
homes connecting the interrupted trail link.
Alternative # proposed to keep the control high 'o".=,i, r level ar l
water level as prescribed by the Comprehensive Storm S,.-,w(-,, Plan. 6e ~d
trees/stumps would need to be removed and the trail would need to be
and replaced.
Advisory Parks and Recrewtion Commission
Minutes of July 7, 19E ing
Page
Member Sames stated that since the trail was there before most of the
homeowners were the elimination of the trail was not the answer. He felt that
the access to Patrick Eagan Park, as well as the importance of all the trail
links, should not be compromised.
Tom Colbert noted tha-. is concern by the
water quality. Specifically the co.icern was for the algae on tI 01~ dl, wiiich
is more typically found in August ather than this early in the sui,111'ler. Mr.
Colbert stated that the pond is going through ecological shock and it will
take some time for it to self-heal. The residents are unsure this will occur
and have expressed that opinion.
JoAnne Alt has visited the property, talked with same of th s
and felt that perhaps the water level should be elevate' f ~
the trail should remain. Michele Swanson, after having w 1 trai1 -s
far as possible noted that the trail connection needs to be 1 n( __:,d didn't
feel the trail would interfere with the view from the homes.
George Kubik stated the trail and the 859.4 water level should be kept
with perhaps some plantings to enhance the trail. Wayne Sames noted h:-It with
the continued growth of the City and anticipated use of the trails th,,t this
will be a vital link to Patrick Eagan Park and he supports keeping ie trail
link.
Another option discussed by r. Vraa included the draining of Mooney
Lake to enable equipment to drive onto the lake bed to remove the stumps and
dead trees that remain from the flooding. The time frame for this kind of
project is unknown but ember Kubik requested that Staff review the time frame
to determine if this would be viable option.
George Kubik moved, JoAnn Alt seconded, with all ~~f~ <V c,
to recommend Alternative #3 and that Staff communica', the
reasons for this recommendation at their July 14, 19 .,ing
STORM RAHN SEWER UPDATE
Tom Colbert advised the Commission that the storm r pro,lo_-t at R lHn
Park would be under construction within the next si
Commission's recommendation, there has been an allocatin~i'? ~0 r
replacement. Member Sames suggested that pictures be c--e sy, i t ::-rthe project's completion.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes o July 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 7
ARK DEV U .~T
Director Vraa stated that the bid o ling for Contrac for nn
Winkler/Jackson and Bridleridge Parks would b Monday, July 11, 1988.
Director Vraa suggested that the Commission begin thiiw`` botit the
possibility of working with a construction management comoa° it xil inq the
proposed Community Center. He suggested that the City
with expertise in construction for a project of 'his s~ saf-ia
company would be able to provide the Cit. -=ith
superintendent as well as a time line fo.• s~...c ~ _ti_-u:s 1ro z f~.~ ~ ~
change order process may become a littl more c olex I th,e v e-a11
construction supervision could be handled by people who are very knowlyd(aP 1.,6e
in this business. Again, this was for Commission consideratiri only so tha.t
construction can continue in a timely and orderly fashion giv 'he nl)"
of the bond referendum for the community center. Mr. Vraa s•
Commission come up with questions and concerns regarding this ssue ,htt c n
be addressed at a later date.
HAPPENINGS
George Kubik asked how the grading was going at Heine Pond. Mr.
Sullivan responded by stating that it was 80 - 9018 complete.
Mr. Kubik encouraged continued participation and support of the Dakol
Inc. program of helping with our parks maintenance.
Member Carroll ask for an updatz G - - 'i? sn f
parks that have been afi . t:.d by the dr uwj,.. to V r,C i. s %t
~ stating that the water..ig of the trees -nd pla.tings Conti -t s 011 6, :L 1y
basis. There are two scheduled routes with tankers out every day watering the
plantings from the last three years which seem to be affected the most. That
amounts to over 3,000 plantings being watered. Ken Vraa noted that because of
the drought the Parks Department is not proceeding with landscaping as was
originally planned for this summer.
Ken Vraa advised the Commission that playgr- r ""and
School was being installed and that the Trapp ~iu ..11 be
planned after the Northview tennis court contract if let this fall.
Bridleridge residents want a meeting with Staff to see if they can accelerate
the process for getting their playground equipment in their park.
George Kubik shared with the Commission that he had r t eivr,.d r~~any
unsolicited compliments on both the parks maintenance and t-~~°:E: n
programs that the City of Eagan provides.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes o July 7,1988 Meeting
Page 8
Dick Carroll noted M he Commission will need to r an, ?^ei
some of the parks that av noz been officially named to date.
With no further business to conduct, George Kubik moved, JoAnn Alt
seconded, with all members voting in favor to adjourn.
The meeting was -Ijourn~,d at 10:15 P.M.
A note to the i nr. ~r at the ca, e f a nn a
picnic has been set for Friday, c,. pr~, 9, 1 ' .
DATE J -`c'
12,
MINUTES THE JOINT MEETING OF THE AGA CITY COUNCIL
AND ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday, May 5, 1988
The meeting was attended by m.--,.. of the City ~1--o nci1 and
Advisory Commission. Staff attending consisted of Tom Hedges, City
Administrator, Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, Steve Sullivan,
Landscape Architect/Parks Planner, Mel Bailey, Parks Intern.
BLACKHAWK PARK
Mr. Vraa and Mr. Sullivan reviewed the south .cces ss_.- to
Blackhawk Park, and presented three base alt^rnativn.. nc;ern-isle the need am-1
timing of road construction. They pc nLed out that ! ~1 PlUwp y had not
shown any interest in providing an early dedication necessary ry road
construction. The owner of Blackhawk Ponds wished to see the road constructed
as soon as possible into the park to avoid conflicts with future residents and
lot sales.
Staff responded to questions concerning roadway costs, size of
acquisition, topography, alternatives and other questions relating to the
project.
Members of the Commission and Council voiced continued support of
the Parks Plan and the importance of the south roadway access. It was stated
that the road should be built all at one time, rather than in two separate
parts as suggested as an alternative. Mayor Ellison suggested that Councilman
Wachter, who has known r. Murphy for some time, and he could meet with Mr.
Murphy to discuss with him the land acquisition. After further discussion, it
was agreed that Mayor Ellison, Councilman Wachter and City Administrator
Hedges, along with Staff would meet with Mr. Murphy to discuss the ,and
acquisition issue, and that the results of that meeting be brought back 11.o tile
attention of the Council and Commission.
COMMUNITY CENTER
Mr. Vraa then reviewed the organizational approach to the
Community Center project, introducing the focus group concept - it's roles,
responsibilities and communication channels.
1
t
After some discussion, Councilwoman Pam McCr-- a,
public be brought into the planning process early, rat
Representatives should be sought from every precinct,
chosen they should indicate why they would like to be on t1 Cc nit, C,
Citizens Committee. Mr. raa directed the group's attention t the pa( et
item concerning the formation of a Citizen's Committee/Reaction Committee. It
was agreed that the reaction committee would come from volunteers in the
community for the planning o the project. Further, after the Council had
agreed to the site and general perimeters of the building, the committ ='could
be formed. Mr. Gustafson questioned when and h-w the prig-iti-s !,,Id be
included into the building process, statin - he fc the ;G-
begin the design process until this h,
that he had thought the process would b a cc, i=. ;'on pryer.. of
costs, needs and benefits, and that the architects would assist i3E -hat
process. Mr. Kubic stated he wanted to know the cost before h° would VuLe to
include an item in the building program. He went on to say 4hat it was not
the first or second priority items that everyone was concern 4h, but the
lower priority items. He wanted to know their cost from t`.: t , o
a decision could be made as for inclusion into the buildir- rj,_,~-
of the Commission and Council voiced their thoughts n,,, l
agreement - that the architects review and input would be ci-tic.3i.
Councilman Wachter expressed concern regarding Cite ; 11
expansion. He commented that one possible idea would be to have a co'an ;wag
link between the Community Center and City Hall. Tom Hedges expanded on the
space needs of the departments and he stated further that the City would need
to undertake a space analysis to determine what the future i r - fo-
of the City Hall building might be.
Administrator, Tom Hedges, stated he wished to supply ome
information concerning the possible School Bond Referendum for Distri-, 1~3.
He stated that he had met with Superintendent Rehwaldt and that the Bo -1 of
Education was looking at a possible referendum which might include i o rr
three elementary schools and three possible timeframes for such a vote. lhes j
timeframes were: October, January or arch/April.
There was general di scu,,,,i on bu ~e?;; Q'
possibility by the School District for refer a s } z
felt the City Council and Commission -I provit' -11 11alic d s c I o s u rt= 2f
the pending Bond Referendum. He also ;elt the City should continue with a
February or Winter Bond Referendum as scoeduled. He prefaced his comments by
saying that the City should not have the referendum until we know it will
pass. The Council expressed their desire for the best community center
possible and that we can not be influenced by uncontroll -le such a :ghar
taxation and future bond referendums of the School Distr' +:E '1
that the bond referendum in one schoo® district 'icy r
City, and that plans needed to be dic on t s.: ad
not dictated by actions of one of the three school --i® _r 1- achter
stated that he felt the pool and ice arena were of primary importance; the
City should build for today's needs, and plan for expansion. He felt a
February Bond Referendum was a reachable goal.
t
After additional comments, the~~t h e
architectural program should be continued and Id
be considered. Changes in the timing can be made de, nt_ the
circumstances regarding the future.
Mr. Uraa then discussed the importance of pr-ii
some philosophical guidelines concerning operational costs, f! ,
He stated that these were important considerations to k F d
included in the architectural pro7.am. He th- direr r i n
committee's attention to the prc' ' ^ontaini-_ inf- on
charges, Pam McCrea stated that s:i- 1 the C E a .
supporting by utilizing user fees an charges. -tuber C-rrol l felt that. ` :F e
City should provide subsidized fees which would provide for usership for those
who could not afford membership or not afford specific user fees. C,.nc 1
Member Egan stated he supported the idea that user fees should be utiliL,J f.A
compensate for operational costs only, but not for bond cost. (`i(mibe
Gustafson felt that the Community Center should', A: E rip t ~ sr PPUN. n,
by its user fees. There was additional discusseo. ort Pg
costs, noting that not all programs should be seit-supp{): f., . it0 Pul
that many community centers are not able to pay for all OPL.,ti(
The general consensus is that the center should attempt to pay f)r all
operational costs, but that certain programs and operations will not be
totally self supporting.
During discussion concerning the community rosD,l use, I'llemJ),or
F -.-on felt the community room could b ; npriate for son U t" ~ro hc)1:i :
beverages, but not necessarily hard l iquo; ; Mr. Gustafson: ' ~,J feMd not
support spirits in the community room and felt the Citi, `u la,, I1
role in this. Member McCrea suggested that when the _F hp f L.}
Room wished to have alcoholic beverages (i.e., weddings, tc.) thev Wr:;n.! rirnn
a form of liability waiver placing the responsibility on the t rExp
Other members of the Commission and Council supported the concept of a Bing
wine for some functions that were appropriate. The use of tine ronirs ,nf?d
provide a valuable source of income for paying operational Xp ns, s Oil:—
would be predicted on the number and types of use and s,UU _ fsuEr
use of the room and alcoholic beverages are to be 1 lop
There was a brief discussion on advertising _id donations.; it w s
generally agreed that some advertising, used as a way of recogriiticn rcir
donations, would be permitted. It was suggested that a committee of staff
develop guidelines for an appropriate time to cover such items.
UNISYS TRAIL
Mr. Jerry Tank, from Unisys T on, v : o n e,.str;t
his firm regarding a trail connection Tr i Pilot Kn( i r~r) t nndl T-nr°k.
Steve Sullivan did reviewed the issues of the trail ..:d nctef t.wu
possible alignments were possible: one would follow the raperty lino a +-he
west and north and a second alignment would be closer to the existing:; roadway
alignment; now blocked off. Mr. Tank stated that Unisys was very oppos€.d
to the alignment adjacent to the roadway - stating his reasons
concerns. He further went on to state that it was nevi Sperry's in!.enth,,n +provide for such a trailway, that in an earlier owlont wit C V
provided for the trail alignment closer to the 0n°es. P . relit,
3
stated that the neighborhood was very much concerned with trail alignment
adjacent to the property. He stated that he felt the topography and existing
vegetation was better along the roadway than adjacent to the neigInbows.
Further, there was not a strong positive sentiment towards S ,rry/Uriis> s, -t
this time. Members of th-i Commissic: ii Counc'.; Are 1 i
should be made to place trail along t,,z- propp-+t, z~
Sullivan's graphic, and V a meeting o ~ th,O
this trail system to be in _lemented. Mr. ~Q ^aa st< t J t ,h=<i v SSar,V
for the City's consulting firm to develop a site plan of exiting cc idi tions:
before a plan could be prepared.
Noting that the meeting had extended beyond the timeframe, the
joint meeting of the Council and Commission was adjourned.
MEMORANDUM
TO: E A, DIRECTOR F PARKS AND RECREATION
O : STEVE SULLIV , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
ATE: MAY 7, 198
: JOINT CITY COUNCIL/..--,KS AND RECREATION COMMI
THURSDAY, Y 26, 1
COMMUNITY CENTER Curs LN 1 S
The following are general comments from the joint City Council and Parks and
Recreation Commission meeting.
1. David Gustafson - Dave" i`,dt - Is ' chni l-~!
group to establ ish design param_':ers ano qu,~1 ity , Ttrol . 1e .-e It
it was necessary to have a "p6o1ic group" to set prioritaz at-ion
for the Community Center facilities. He felt that the City,
Council and Commission, should provide full public disclosure of
the pending bond referendum. He also felt that we sLiuld contir: e
with a February bond referendum as scheduled. V- -T4 5ed ; s
comments by saying that theCith should not have r-1"r,r(--, Y
until we know the referendum will pass. He will of S1!ia Ort
spirits in the community room. He also felt that the comiinutIity
center should be self supporting by users fees. David felt that
we should hire someone in regards to concessions. This person
should have a background in the food business or the City should
lease the space to a vendor.
2. Ted Wachter. Ted expressed concern in regards to future Cit:Y Hall
expansion. He mentioned a scenario of a community center which
would be tied to City Hall via a skywall,., 'un_--- , etc. HO felt
that the ice and swimming pool was of .`in 'mp~rtance. He al:o
mentioned that we should build for now but -rovide the ability for
future expansion of the community center. He supported the idea
of a February bond referendum.
. Tom Egan. Tom expressed that we should work for the b~-t
community center that we can and not be influenced "y
uncontrollables such as higher taxatinn and Fr?tui,,, bo,
referendums. He also supported the ide t iser tees <f,rf~rl be
utilized to compensate operational costs.
4. Pam McCrea. She would like to see upfront citizen input utilizing
a reaction group which has representation from every precinct.
These people, besides being chosen would also have to indicate why
they would want to be on the community center citizens committee.
She felt that the community center should be self-supporting "y
r
utilizing user fees and charges. Pam ~a -d L althe u~y of
the community room at a time including bits, d n'~Ee=d 1,o
sign a form which waived liability of the City anu placed sEt(--'h
liability on the user group.
5. Dick Carroll. He felt that we should provide subsidized fees
which would provide for usershi p for those who c 1 not a f' . w,--J!
membership or user fees.
. George Kubik. He felt that any user utilizing the c_... 'y room
should provide the City with a damage deposit.
7. Tom Hedges. He expressed a concern that the City and Public
Safety departments are currently bursting at the seams. He felt
that the architect should do a master plan for the entire site
which took into account the need for expansion or the dapl-,ation
of the community center to acconim-o °a e the fut~'I"'d= C; he
municipality. He gave an examp?e ~ng f0 tU
initially accommodate a one story cs, -.unity c_..t u~i-1(1~f ~t
could provide future accommodation or multi-~_ories for the
future municipal center. Tom also expressed the need for a
parking lot study.
The was a general consensus regarding the use of advertising or major
community center components. An idea was bro, r- up that g
committee should be formed to d _!rmine the p ° tnr for ai,., i q irnar
was to occur within the community= center.
JU
T : ADVISORY PARKS AiiO RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
ATE: JULY 28, 1988
SUBJECT: CONSENT AGENDA
1. Conditional Use Permit - Yocum Oil Co.
A conditional Use Permit to allow an automobile service station a
car wash on Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition loca-!-.~'-? Pat s
NE intersection of Thomas Center Drive and Cliff Road in the ~W 1,'4 of
Section 28.
Recommendation:
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
2. alaie Cliff Plaza - Cliff Plaza Partnership
A Re°^ninq and Preliminary Platof 25.36 A (Agricultural) i to a
Planr d --Development district located cm ~h k)f Cliff Rn -.u.11 t ;off
Galaxi Avenue and east of I-35E in the NW 11? " n 32.
Recommendation
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
A 5' wide sidewalk be placed along the west side of Galaxy ie.
3. Waiver of Plat - Vin- ,4~ " . m-dy
A of Plat in order to split Lot 5, 2ehnder Acres, i n l[o rz , e
parcels located in the SE 1/4 of Section 4 north of Lone Oak Ru,'-', ar.d
west of Pilot Knob Road.
Recommendation
The plat be subject to a c,rh parkland 4-dication.
4. oodlan0s, A_ 'ddition - fort _g t _
A Preliminary Plat consisting of 12 lots on 7.35 R-I (Single Family)
acres located north of Basswood Lane in the SE 1/4 of Section 14.
Recommendation
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
5. Sunset Addition - . uttner
Rezoning of 10.53 (Agricultural) acres t an R-1 (Single Family)
district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 16 lots located north of
Sunoo Trail and south of Birch Street in the SE 1/ of Section 1.
Recommendation:
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
6. Seneca Plant dd. - Metrooolitan Waste Control Comm.
A Preliminary Plat consisting of 87.83 acres fcr ['11 P of the
Seneca Water Treatment Plant located t of C. , R ad in the west
1/2 of Section 17 and the east 1/ of (Li;°
Recommendation:
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
MEMORANDUM
TO; ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMISSIO"
O : STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,' P,
DATE: JULY 29, 1988
SUBJECT: HI HVIE PARK ADDITION
PROPOSAL
The proposal requests the preliminary plat o hroo singl~_r lots on 2.27
acres currently zoned R-1.
BACKGROUND
The parcel supports an existing home which is proposed to be platted on one of
the three lots. (See Figure #1) The parcel lies directly north of Hig!-.Nic,,
Park.
The Advisory Planning Commission denie,1 -oposal. pr': otrc. r n
was the proposed lot widths at the setback line; they are, got consi: t-=;t =pith
the existing lots within the neighborhood.
ISSUE
The Commission will need to make recommendations regarding the 3 ll;bx ~issues:
I. Should the preliminary plat provide a tra il to H i t "v rr.
2. What are the parkland dedication requirement .
ISSUE #
The existing residential area north of Highview Park includes approximately
sixty-seven (67) lots. Pedestrian access to the park from this aroa is
provided along the public roads to a trail section along Pilc} ~Ro'ad.
Pedestrians proceed south on Pilot Knob '.oad to Skyline: load, ~ to
Highview Park. The furthest walking d ~ is apprc fina,~cly 1-1/' "2s to
the park. (See Figure #2)
The future development of both Prettyman Heights and Ridgehaven Addition does
not provide a vehicular or pedestrian link between the residential area
located north and south of the park. The Engineering Department assessment
concludes that steep terrain located directly west of the park suggest that a
north/south road will not occur in the future.
The distance to the park and lack of a future north/south connection Ni y
warrant the need for a trail easement through the proposed development. he
placement of a 20' trail easement between proposed lots #1 02 would provide a
direct connection to Highview Park from the northern residential area. The
furthest walking distance would be approximately / mile to the park. (See
Figure
ISSUE #
Staff has reviewed the value of a parkland dedication. The m 1 and
amount provides no benefit to Highview Park. Therefore, Staff roci '.'s a
cash parkland dedication.
FOR ICOMMISSION ACTION
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission may consider the follo3eId Mvj.
recommendations:
1. The developer provide a 20` trail easement between lots 1 & .
R
The developer provide no trail easement to Highview Park.
2. The developer provide a cash parkland dedication.
IZIQC Nn 'NVVV3+QRki 3-ODOa 33MNVA 09ZZI :W0 e P
zcearKS•~oeWNDS;S340bd 3dINZNM caz""',av.•s~x.1a.p NOI-ICCIVI marci 1 1 a
q SH3NNV"ld ! SU33NIJN3 / S80A S
• a tY Y -r ~c € B
'.?NI '0"J ONIA3AunS QNV1-I wt .+";'«we N .aq • u to 4..~ E € - 4
xz•• i rr I I - £ ~
~•,•m•s vrv
I i 1 I+Y~ .+n • Am 4h ry~ ~ V
r «'"°o a z,e` N r•,oa ®w. , e.a Alt°111,('j .i.@"" J+ YI 4j
61
aw
tr
r f
i
~f X K t 9 #
mW 99y -flit.,, rPmti f
0 y "
t
r
d '
! t?.I
1
p^
to
I i J® 1 X
y«
A Q ` r !
aq! r r k; ~a
' • / /
r1;` r / f
4 /
r
a / / l r r 3 3 4, c
h ~
r
s ;
i
„y
L
~TA6AN
_ LOST SPUR`
3
CLUB
WYNDHAM
I
F% I
d CLae7 - _s t ~s "hr`s' s • °r-- - I~-..i..l
LAKE
1/ ~c f ~ ~ l / x• T
.
IACR
A
a
M,
I~ ~ r
SCHOO
IL s.
Ai, IL
EE
F.L. {
t
fP'r !f
0 7HASN
f. A M. M
As b.
a
OF
KI" Nn 'N'r9v'3 CM]a 3lp'jp~33JINVA o9Zi :n00
2®Z 31M-WE°i~t,SS INNS M N*M -I-M s•y ,p y...... r, NQ1..LIQO`{',f HdVcl 1AHJIH
SU3NNV-ld / SM33NION3 / 5 S m w
3NI` w.~ r+ta td -roc nto3
09JNI.l3A8nS ONb1-i a T.
"
M1. a~...• .ti `:e•«. ••~nna•M K7Nt/ 4MIGJ~tly E
~rvw•rvfatt '
1 ! +ror . w f an we w.m a.nr ~ ~
wra µ .ue..r w+ u•vu `.tlt" J.Y4
+•+'~~1«••ni..v l~u•:N+w n XbtHtr~Wt«t32~ cl 3
1tL i i § r
I
!
a / 1
Q t
=ate, ~ " a
a ` \
4~
a n t' /,'3 3'r g
• ~ , t ,.~~-tom" 1 / / r S
g °
U / t 4
~ ..a ~ ! ~ t t t ! a
r ~ • / ! t l
1 t t , , t / t r
E e l
z
S
i
: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JULY 2, 1988
SUBJECT: WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION
PROPOSAL
The proposal requests the preliminary plat of seventy-one (71) tonhomes on
9.83 acres currently zoned R-.
BACKGROUND
The proposed preliminary plat is 1 c'', vithin Nei,. _~,;ood Park Servic
14.
The designated neighborhood park is Woodlands School/Park located 3j4 mile
from the proposed Wescott Square Addition. The north and northeasterly
portion of the Park Service District contains approximately 60 acres of both
developed and undeveloped multiple family ?oned property.
Wescott Hills Addition, a multi-famil~ , .-lopr(- ==xists to the west, and
south of the proposed development is another 9 acres of undeveloped R-4
property.
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW
The Commission will need to make recommendations in regards to the following
issues:
1. Does the existing Woodlands School/Park adequately support t; ads of
Neighborhood Park Service Area 14 - including the existing abd proposed
multi-family areas?
2. What is the park dedication requirement for Wescott Square Addition?
ISSUE 1
The Advisory Planning Commission at the July 26, 1.
_
concern regarding the intensity of multi-family devel u i:t4~thii
Service Area, proximity to the newest neighborhood park, AND T AVAILABILITY
OF PARK FACILITIES TO THIS AND FUTURE RESIDENTS.
Wescott Hills and the Wescott Square Additions are approximately 3j4 mile from
both the Woodland School/Park and Wescott Station Park, located in Park
Section #13.
Another thirty-four (34) acres of undeveloped multiple land ; to the s'outh ;f
this preliminary plat. Eighty (80) acres of multipl_ iy
(Tamarac and Lexington Place) lies approximately 1/4 'o 3j4 mile a r >>r
Woodlands School/Park. The majority of the remaining Neighborhood Park
Service Area consists of single family residential and the Carriage Hills Golf
Course (See Figure #1). Staff estimates the service area build out population
for the multi-family at 3,582 and for the single family at 2,843 for a total
of 6,425.
The Commission should determine whether the existing park service area
adequately services the park user population. If not the Col-r,u'ssion may
consider alternatives of either a mini-park or the develc~per° providing or-r-s;°r,
amenitites to supplement the existing parkland. The Cormv,rehensive Park Sys tell
sets the following general classification criteria for both neighborhood and
mini-parks.
Mini ark
These are park sites for local recreation which are not large enough to be a
complete Neighborhood Park. The mini-park may either serve a smaller servlic e
area or provide only a limited number of facilities. The site must ho useab)o
for its intended purpose and is not intended to be a "cal ,ch 11111
classification. The typical minipark provides very limited ai.l basic
facilities such as play equipment or an open field games area. Several
miniparks within a park service area could collectively be considered as a
neighborhood park if each of the mini-parks contained one or more of the
necessary components of a complete neighborhood park. There is no requirement
for mini-parks, that is, ideally a City would have no mini-parks. They are
only provided when there is a park need in an area which cannot be r-ul-Filled
-in any other way.
Nei hborhood Park
These park sites designed primarily for local recreational activities on a
park service area basis. Neighborhood parks are the basic unit in the park
system and will be the most common type of park found. Facilities provided in
the basic neighborhood park are a 250' 250` open field game area, paved hard
courts games area and trails, play equipment facilities for preschool and
elementary age children and a passive or natural area. O _ion__ facilities
which may be found here are: improved ballfields, socce st r,t,is
courts, hockey and skating rinks, and parking. The optimal serv ce area is
usually within a 1/2 mile radius and that service area should not extend
beyond major barries.
T PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
COMPONENT E t SE 1 AREA SITE SITE ATTRIBUTES ITE LOCATION
Mini Pork $ es a concentrated Serves a small issr- Site varies Same tsras hi gn doruiry~
lotion, ific 9r-*. vice amit, US&OGI (e the siNA .rU bps twi gF(Xhoxxjl
(City juris- or provides only limited . Ills than 1/4 mile area is suitablW for Ate w.s~re °roicol
diction or facilities an a local basis. radius, population typically cifie %no which P'No a yonts
private) Typically mini parks provide served is at I t 1 to 4 required the do not exist.
only one or two is foci- residents. . site. May be in
Iities such as play equiptnerst, locatiore such
open Geld games area, or o as aportmant
Short trail. a lexes,
rt~r~,ne
~ s~ i c+ismrenR
V c n rcial
curef+ n,
Neighborhood Area for local recreational Optimal service 10 acre +aphy Acc*~iole to
Pork P`crr- activities was as a 250' ar area is usually minimun; suited for intend*d service
ourd 250' open field games area, within a 1/2 mile is typically in:se develop- area ,
More
courts
paved Kord area, radius. Service 10 to 12 ment. Some, active paria
for
ity juris- trails, play equip nt J~ould not extend acres but natural amisni- need hatter
.tion) and elementary jar may bear ties are de- access to
age children and a passive isirs to large si le but not collector
or I area. ti I access. 20 acres. r>~,ui s h.
Facilities way include im- 2,000 to 5,000 t 60-0 at
Proved ballfae , wiccer population
I n of
fields, i wris courts, Fri a
ri , rinla and p I" Witt.
pork,' ;i1' i .
Historically the Advisory Parks Recreation Commission n"JI
avoided mini-parks. This policy stance is based on the min -
parks decrease maintenance efficiencies, increase ~ra
difficult to program and provide adequate area for only a rucrea;.;on "All
amenity. If the Commission views this as a special case; parkland acquisition
would be necessary. However, the Wescott Square Addition provides V` tla
opportunity for parkland acquistion being encompassed by streets. Staff f-els
a north central location would relate more effectively to the multi-f -1y.
The mini-park land use could provide transition between the multifamily
single family.
The Commission may also consider having the proposed multi-family
provide on-site amenities to supplement the existing park to s
residents within the development. Historically this approach has bpt-,F:
utilized in large high density areas.
The Parks Dedication Policy does provide the opportunity for the C, fission 'ro
recommend a credit to the development's park dedication oblig-tion ,,3hr-'fj
providing usable recreation facilities.
In the past several multi-family developments have been rer,(1 ;.tt Lo Provide
playground equipment and open play space with no credit.
In accordance with the Land Use Ordinance for multi-family development the
following is required to be provided:
Each multiple dwelling complex shall have a minims a
equal to two hundred (200) square feet for each '11
two (2) or less bedrooms and one hundred (100) L ' i fe''t
for each dwelling unit containing more than tw O d
recreation area shall be a minimum of one hundred (10") additional
square feet from any ponding area.
Source: Ordinance No. 52
Effective Date: 4/25/75
ISSUE
Staff feels that the location and acreage (9.83 14%= 1.4 acre dedication) of
the development does not justify parkland dedication. Therefore, Staff
recommends the developeer provide a cash dedication.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider the following recommendati : Zja r ;l1g the
preliminary plat:
o The developer provide a cash parkland dedication
o A ' wide sidewalk be placed along the south side of Yankee Doodle
Road.
o The developer provide open play space and tot lot within the
development parcel
OR
The developer need not provide open play space and tot lot
The Commission may consider the following alternatives regardin 4~ I .needs of Neighborhood Park Service Area 14.
o Multi-family developments provide on-site open play space and
playgrounds
R
o Acquisition for a park should occur with fut (Ievel opiiie n n
order to supplement the existing park service
s
;
A
F
{p r
ups
{
Cf 1
i
A
=r
PUBW
•,,Vl 6 .f 4 , R D.
1 r
r
S r
74
3
a E
TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : E VRAA, DIRECTOR PARKS AND RECREATION
ATE: JULY 28, 1988
E: BERRY PATCH A a
ACKRO :
The Advisory Commission was briefed on ' "-rr a~ A ! ~ ~aAkp
issues that had developed with the aQ- a prcp:r s -1 r<< < d,i
Road. Engineering reviewed the possib•;lity of c.;i -i the ell ion, of
Mooney Lake. The Advisory Commission motioned to maintain the cu~,rerltl pond
elevation, to provide cleanup of the park area with reinstallation of the
bituminous trail. Director of Public Works, Tom Colbert and I met with the
adjacent property owners on July 14th to review with them the issues that Were
reviewed with the Advisory Commission. The residents subsequently have
requested to appear before the Advisory Commission and atte <I. 'Co resolv,, H"Ee
issues.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attached tothis memorandum are several informative items for the Commission's
attention. The first is a memo from Tom Colbert dated July 27, 1988
pertaining to the cost that would be incurred for reinstallation of the storm
sewer system in order to accommodate a proposed change in pond elevation that
was previously discussed.
Attachment #2 is a letter dated June 29, 1981 to r. R o(4 L 4- of the Sienna
Corporation concerning the trails in the Hilltop Estz:_ c. I call your
attention to the first two paragraphs which simply indicate that the City had
a neighborhood meeting with the residents of the Hilltop Estates, the material
the trail was to be constructed out of and finally the time line for
construction.
Attachment #3 is the June 27, 1988 memo from Tom Angus of Bonestroe 1-bo -ric
Anderlik & Associates concerning alternatives for increasing the pond 'evel.
Attachment #4 is information from Dakota County Soils. They had r t'e
problem prior to the first neighborhood meeting in June. This briEF r-dort
reviewed the then current conditions on the type of algae growth within Mooney
Lake and possible management options for treatment.
Finally, the last attachment is the staff memorandum from the last Advisory
Commission meeting.
DISCUSSION:
From the meeting with the residents, there appears to be several points made
by the residents.
1. Many of the residents bought th^ir "^mes thir=king t! po d
elevation they saw was the normal cc-id -'t r1+,1 ~sa1 i ~E
pond was at an elevated I evel. lt e ' e v, ' 111
has affected how they view the art.. lue cr t!=ir
property.
. The water quality is very poor. Residents have concluded that the
decline in water quality from what it has been in the -a 't is the
direct result of the lowering of the water level.
want a lake, raising the water level to as high an 4 -uz i olil
possible is important to them regardless if the trail p,ar k s
flooded.
3. No one uses the trail, therefore, let the trail be flooded out..
4. Why spend money to repair the trail! Save the money and use it
for other parks purposes.
. The adjacent property owners are the ones moss rted ,
they should be able to decide what they want.
. Revise the Comprehensive Storm t s Man<,, Plan an
Trail Plan. A revision to the Storm Water Ian and incr t::t-
elevation would require the reconstruction of the storm s..: _.~s.
(t the time of the meeting, Staff did not have any cost est! rtes
on this work. You can see from the memo from r. Colbert on July
27th, the estimate for these revisions is now $9,500.)
There is no doubt that there has been an almost c( 1)-'e,1 t _°rnovcr -)f
homeowners since the trail was originally installed it : E. Tit ils vex','
likely that many of the homeowners could not have been a')] ~ to appreciate 0,,e
benefits and the beauty of the trail prior to the flooeu elevation. It is
also likely that they are not aware of the use the trail received before it
was impacted.
"Use" is a subjective statement. Because there are no qualifiable t to
determine the amount of use the trail section had, I sus!rect C ,N . l be a resolution as to whether the trail was "heavilY y r.2s
'tei
or "never used". I would dispute, however, that the - rrai 1 ~Ver" u e . 1
am sure the Commission will agree with this because they, - )o, had received
comments from the neighborhood when the trail was flooded out; and a
memorandum in my file dated May 29, 1986 regarding a call from Mrs. Hugh
Bennett at 1281 Berry Ridge Road regarding park users crossing through lbru h
along the west boundary of the park property to gain better access to Moc
Lake. This was at a time when flooding conditions prohibited direct Lo
the trail which was partially submerged at that time.
Residents have commented that theuality i This is t f
the algae growth and weed growth th il, they have sE Staff has m< r.`
that this is not uncommon and that many of Eagan`s ponding areas havf ~,3_
adversely affected in a similar manner. John Barton from Dakota County Soils
has reviewed the issue and was present at both of the it i tLe
residents. He has indicated that an increase in the i -
will not improve the water quality nor resolve the issues o.
The residents had asked that the City pursue an increas in the p
elevation. Of the two alternatives discussed, the first alternative pro:: d
for an increase of the normal water elevation from an 859.4 to 860.6. T ;i s
would be approximately one foot below the lowest point of the hit~ta°,~cs
trail. Alternative 2 would be to increase the pond elevation to an 833.7.
This would increase the high water elevation to an 867. The 863 !"-v ('ffi _1;
the approxi,,<Ate flood elrt ;Edon that occurred causing th- a~'_ j >S 0
trees. With the 863 now the normal ati on, the hii ' a ~ 01 F i
increase to 867, or approximately four More Tke
elevation would obviously jeopardize ,Iny trE are i'h 1 863
elevation. Thus, the probability of incurrinc lar er tree loss resu_Ls
this alternative. This alternative would also cost approximately $9,50%0.
Staff has received a quote from Lund Asphalt Construction Company, who has
done a number of trails within the parks system and they have quoted the City
$6,850 to remove the existing bituminous path and replace it with a foul, en h
crushed base and a two inch bituminous we,-U^ coarse. second
which simply provides for cleaning of the ex s ing b:, p a israny of the bad areas and then overlaying wi,, a two i,:,~ ~r:a3J
cost approximately $3,600. Either option is significan ly less t an the
increase in the pond elevation.
REPRESENTATIVE MEETING
Late Thursday afternoon, July 28, 1988, the Director met with two or, Uh,,a
affected property owners to discuss what can be accomplished under t
different options.
The Director suggested that, for the above reasons, a new Li. ...-us trail a
constructed, and if possible, at a somewhat higher elevation. This may n
only two to three inches.
Because of the tree stumps and general mess, it was also suggested that a
bulldozer and operator be contracted to clean up the shoreline. (40 hours
$100/hr. = $4,000) Work would include removal and clean-up of existing
shoreline in preparation to re-install the trail.
NEIGHBORHOOD REACTION
Representatives were to meet with the neighbors over the July 30/31st weekend
and bring in a written statement.
O COMMISSION CTIO
To review the problem and alternatives; to make a recommendation to:
- Have the pond elevation raised
- Re-install the trail
- Re-install the trail and provide for shoreline clean-up
- Or..
MEMO TO: KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF F't3 _;:;C WORKS
DATE: JULY 7, 1988
SUBJECT: BERRY PATCH PARK/OONEY LAKE
POND JP-7, PROPOSED CHANGE IN ELEVATION
COST ESTIMATES
At the last neighborhood meeting held on July 14th, you an,, I
collectively presented additional information perta'I.',il-l. to
interested riparian property owners' request to rai<_° the
elevation of the above-referenced wetland. As you recall, the
engineering division identified concerns associated with
submerging existing storm sewer facilities to varying degrees
dependent upon different pond elevations. As a result of that
meeting, the residents will be discussing the issue of abandoning
the trailway with the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commis7ion at
their August 4th meeting. Concurrently, they recua= a t~~~~:3
engineering division to prepare cost estimates associat_ell Wit,11
reconstructing the storm sewer facilities to acco-ml-m -late fire
different elevations in the pond.
As you recall, there are two elevations being discussed in
specific detail. The first provides for an elevation of 860.6
which is approximately 1.0 feet below the lowest point of the
existing trailway system. This proposed water elevation is 1.2
feet above the comprehensive storm sewer controlled water
designation of 859.4. Raising the water elevation to 860.6 would
impact approximately 165 feet of 21" storm sewer pipe. If this
were to be reconstructed to the higher elevation, it would cost
approximately $2,,800.
The ultimate desires of several property owners are to raise the
water elevation to its previous level of 863.3. This higher
elevation would totally submerge your trailway system as well as
approximately 420' of 18" and 21" storm sewer pipe. Of t' his
quantity, 295. feet would have to be reconstructed to a h ilie
elevation and 125 feet would have to be removed entirely. In
addition, adjustments would have to be made to the existing storm
sewer lift 'station and the storm sewer outlet from Berry Ridge
Lane on the south side. The total estimated cost of all these
revisions required by the 863.3 elevation is approximately
$9,515.
Page Two
It is thought that the commission may want to have th?.s
information available when considering the property owl'ie
request to change the elevation of the pond.
Neither the consulting design engineer, Assistant City Engineer
or myself will be available to attend the August 4th Commission
meeting due to prior commitments. However, if a y additic Ll
information or clarification would be helpful, plez
and I will try and provide it before hand.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas A. Colbert
cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
TACfjf
BE_
a
June 9, 1
Dut o
Hans,
see
bt
r
v I ,
T
rind;
ti ' y L trees
Ww
'7 tht,cc api a ` . e
that are
sui 7Cl
a a
in July or
s
1 <
-AK TREE
so
MeetiT 'u.' 9.
--re1 a
f
}
to -
Otto G. Bon. k..., 7
Rob;
P.E. A
M L PE.
June 27, 1988
Mr. Tom Colbert
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Pond JP-7, Berry Patch Park
City Project No. 473
Our File No. 49G
Dear Tom:
As per your request, we have reviewed the drainage areas and upstream ponding
for Pond JP-7 based on current plans for development of the drainage basin.
Our analysis indicates that the water levels and storage for Pond JP-7 could
be revised as follows:
STORAGE
NWL HWL ~ AC . FT.)
Existing Condition
& Comprehensive Plan 859.4 865.2 47.6
Alternate No. 1 860.6 865.2 39.4
Alternate No. 2 863.3 867.4.
Alternate No. 1: Maintain comprehensive plan HWL.
Alternate No. 2: Raise HWL to elevation that is 2' below top of lift station.
The water elevation of Pond JP-7 was 863.1 in October 1986.
Page 1.
01
Mr. Tom Colbert June 27, 1988
City of Eagan
Eagan, MN
If the NWL and HWL are revised to the proposed levels the following issues
will need to be addressed:
1. The alternate NWL's would be above the invert of 160' to '170' of storm
sewer pipe within Chatterton Ponds Addition. The pr-yon levels
would also cover to varying degrees the energy dissj)p -.or in the
vicinity of the lift station and the storm sewer inlet west of the
lift station that drains two catch basins in Berry Ridge Road.
2. The proposed basement elevation for Lot 21, Block I C}..
Ponds Addition is 867.2. Assuming this would be a walla°- :t,
the lowest allowable walkout level for this house would Lees y.3 be
raised 2.2' to elevation 869.4 prior to issuance of a buildii permit,
if alternate no. 2 is selected.
3. As indicated on the attached sketch of the profile of the existing
trailway around the pond, varying portions of it would be under water
at all times if alternate no. 2 is selected.
We did obtain elevations of the lower homes around U" -7. The lowest- h,u:7e is
located at 1269 Berry Ridge Road, east of the lift tati(~n and is at elevation
869.6 or 2.2' above the HWL for alternate no. 2.
Based on our analysis, we would recommend that the ponding levels be revised
if the issues we raised can be satisfactorily addressed.
We are also in the process of preparing a 200 scale drainage basin ovetLLla~~ map
for JP-7. This map will be completed following further study and analysis of
upstream pond JP-37 which is being accomplished by your staff`. The 1'esuLt.s of
that study do not affect the storage requirements of ponJ JP-7, eeer the
study will affect the definition of the subdrainage area to pond JP-3.
Yours very truly,
BONFRTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
n
owe f
Thomas E. Angus
TEA:ci
Encl.
Page 2.
01
a 6
r
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 VIC ELLISON
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
May 18 , 1988 DPAMMELA MUcCREEAON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
Re: Berry Patch Park - Pond Elevation City Administrator
Neighborhood Meeting ° 4:30 P.M., May 24, 1988 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Dear Riparian Property Owner:
Recently, there have been several comments and concerns expre~3s,'A
regarding the storm sewer project which provided for a storm
water pump outlet resulting in lowering the previous high water
elevation for the pond in Berry Patch Park.
Due to the similarity of the concerns expressed to date, i is
thought that it would be helpful to have an
meeting to provide an opportunity for the prop,,-,rty owner who
ajoin this park to discuss their mutual COIIC'3 with
representatives from the City of Eagan*
Therefore, Mr. Mrs. Tom Martens have offered to host this
informal neighborhood meeting in their home at 1311 Berry R.,Ig,.
Road. At this meeting, I will explain the overall storm weF
management plan and its relationship to the pond within '>,,.arry
Patch Park adjacent to your property. Also in attendance will.. De
Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation, who will 1D:,
available to answer questions regarding the management of this,
park property.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the mailing list identifying the
riparian property owners. Due to the dynamic growth of the City,
and your neighborhood in particular, this information may not be
accurate for some of the newer residents. Therefore, if ar >u 1<:rio w
that your neighbor is not properly identified on the
list, we would appreciate your sharing this information lv:11-1~ t11om,
informing them of this meeting.
We look forward to meeting you and answering any questions you
may have.
8incerel
omas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
Enclosure
cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recre,_ition
THE LONE O TREE THE SYMBOL E STRENGTH r GROWTH IN OUR vR
1+1641517001 1U1e4751f10t31 101647519081 101697520001
WILLIAM H MARCIA DOVE DONALD W & NANCY J CREIGHION RICCI M GIESE SILAS S H KUNG t
1349 CH! RTON CT 1385 CHATTERTOW CT CHERYL MaGrv1S(7N-GIESF EVETTE WELLS
EAGA14 t• 55123 EAGAN M14 55123 1626 BOHLAND AVE 1521 B CLEMSON DR
ST PAUL MN 55116 EAGAN MN 55122
101697521001 103300003001 103300004001 103300001002
ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOC INC KIRK A 6 RUTH I ZADACH BRUCE A & DIANE PATRICK GARY & JUETTE MUSSELWHITE
4601 81ST ST t9 vlnl 1263 BERRY RIDGE RD 1269 BERRY RIDGE RD 1281 BERRY RIDGE RD
MPLS MN 55437 EAGAN MIS 55122 EAGAN MN 55122 EAGAN MN 55123
10330000300P 103300004002 103300005002 103300006002
3 CARtJEY CkAIG H & MARCIA kOCHELEAU RICHARD L A DIANNE MOBROTEN R08ERT L K CARLA INGALLS
1293 BERRY RIDGE RD 1297 BERRY RIDGE NO 1301 BERRY RIDGE RD 1305 BERRY RIDGE RD S
EAGAN MN 55123 £AGA14 MN 55122 EAGAN MN 55122 EAGAN MN 55123
103300007002 103300008002 103300001003
THOMAS C K CHERYL MARTENS ROBERT D K MARGARET WHITE BOYD F JR R LAURIE F ARNOLD
1311 E;LRRY RIDGE RD 1317 BERRY RIDGE RD 1327 BERRY RIDGE RD
EAGAN WN 55123 EAGAN MN 55123 EAGAN MN 55123
15 10 33000 020 02
DAVID & DELORES SCHMEISER
1287 BERRY RIDGE RD
r.AUAN MN 55122
s
t
s y
F ~
K
4
Wetland Data Sheet
i
A. Wetland No.: JP- 7 section: 22
S.t3.i
DNR Protected Waters No.: 148W City: r'r t
C. Wetland Classification: CLASS V OPEN WATER
D. Existing Use:
Sediment Retention NO Stormwater Storage NO
Sediment Retention*(NVS) NO Aesth,'~tics
Nutrient Trap NO Wildlife Habitat ~ZES
Nutrient Trap*(NVS) NO RecrFuation
*NVS = No visible source
E. Wetland Characteristics:
Size (acres): 7.8
Open water (acres): 7.8
Normal Water Elevation: 859.4
High Water Elevation: 865.2 11,
Soils: SANDY LO
Landscape position: UPLAND Vegetation: GRASSES, WILLOW, DEAD TREES l
F. Drainage Characteristics: ~Direct Drainage Area: 53.0 ac.
Total Drainage Area: 53.0 ac. i
Upstream Wetlands: 0.0 ac.
Upstream Wetlands (no.): 0 ;I
Groundwater Influence: PERCHED
Drainage is to:
Drainage is from: -
Inlet (I) and Outlet (0):
I O
Stormsewer (gravity) 2
Stormsewer (:force)
Channel
Culvert
Swale
None
G. Direct Drainage Area Characteristics:
Glacial origin: TILL
Soil Texture: LOAMY SAND OVER SAND D GRAVEL
Slope: 6-12%
Land Use: (exisiting) SINGLE FAMILY PES10ENTIAL
(proposed) R-1 PK A
H. Evaluation of Potential Wetland Functions (High, Medium, Low):
Sediment Retention HIGH Aesthetics HIGH
Nutrient Trap MEDIUM Wildlife Habitat HIGH
Stormwater Storage HIGH Recreation MEDIUM
1. Notes:
SEDIMENT RETENTION AND NUT?-TEAT TRAPPING POTENTIAL
REDUCED IF AN OUTLET I INSTALLED. HIGH WATER
.LEVEL, SOME DEAD TREES. ,
F VVV
f
,
4
I
17
C-22 ! J 2
t-
-72
I r~ t
IL
t
B_ 40
J I
J / f` J-62
}
d
JJJ
I \ J- 15
® 2
l
-64
' B-4
B-3 I
j~ Y MTCN~
I
B-34 1,j
B-6 s a p
,)B 35
_ l
J
L -7
J- 65
-B 26 /or
,i
.r
B - 2 B..
4
f
2 I ea
i /
B 14
r
2 91
[4
J, A L I
17
L- b
tr 777 _..C~'e~} Lt)~ f6
13-18
_
w
l1
rA
WARKVIE
It 7>
F
l;r 13-19
CIIrs,
. .
Sta e € "vsot I _se projects An11 i= rcqu, e emits :rcfn the DNF sted conditions are met:
t `i t t s f as ~ S Ut Proiett Restrction3
Beach Sand BlanUets
T l 1 WI (i a 1 T I?! t --2e £f ~Iolfutants
WORK CAN BE OUT o,',2 ak
PROTECTED WATERS PERMIT t u t~e y I, ch
ti :S C j ilh - t,2L? N.- ciw the rdi y r. xater mark (OFD',") e; ,,n i be repeated ono- _ ~
a e
t rr6 - r1 of rrctected L,vd,`1 ds, <v subject to the d dlr,--nsions of bk°nket.
of th, De Resou e l wetlands, the CF ' is F water Rock Riprap (for shore protection)
level w rtc h ,3s '-,2 en r t led fora of * r -ca of time to leave Ur on the - i rock only, at least 12 inches diameter or larger.
lands _.cIe, 1-e 0; 0,lt _mmonly LL -t fir t 1 tra_ tre natural vegetaLwr, c from .core than 5 feet waterward of the Ordinary High Wa?, r
predomir t` acu,atic to predominantly ter For watercourses, the OH "V is the elevation ,)n, orms to natural alignment of shore and does not ob ~w water.
of the top of t e of he channel. For r, cfrs and flowages, the OHW is the operating 't tum finished slope no steeper than 3:1 (horizont, , --al).
w n t a posted fish spawning area, designated trout ar along the shores of Lake
elevation or ti ;c nt .-nmer pool." ❑n~~~dor.
Streams With a Watershed Less Than 5 Square Miles (3,200 acres).
NGT TO SL A L ptr . '.t is required to co--',, ct a bridge or culvert, or ter or excavate the beJ o` rcYected
p v -rcourse having a tot area, at its mouth, of 5 ~ uare miles or less, provide`
OHW (Ordinary High Water Mark) for Basins Y owity zoning officials a o> a= Soil and Water Conservation District are given at ieast 7 days
Wor notice and determin he project will not result in downstream erosion or sedimentation.
State J~~ risd"c'io,=extends waterward e project will not divert one water to a different watershed,
-iect will not impound
of OHW The pro' pound water by damming the watercourse.
N Range of water level .e watercourse is not an officially designated trout stream.
fluctuation varies
[i from take to take . is Removal
1v Ordinary High Water Level em t is required to remove debris such as trees, logs, stumps and trash as long as the original
Record high ~ ~ _ ' mt, slope or cross-section of the lake, marsh or stream bed is not altered.
watert(:,,iel tggtjeE t~ ltverageWater Level
a iir o Public Drainage Systems
Cattail, Bulrush, Sedges Recor f four • No permit is required to repair a lawfully established public drainage system (Judicial Ditch,
and other aquatic vegetation ~tytatef,v~t County Ditch, etc.) provided:
The repair complies with the definition set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 106A.701,
Subdivision 1 (Public Ditch Law).
Some projects will not require permits from tl: Department of Natural Resources if certain The repair does not affect significant fish and wildlife habitat or protected vegetation
(such as
state or federal wildlife management areas, designated scientific and natural areas, etc.)
conditions are met. However, local units of government and other agencies, such as the U.S.
Corps of Engineers, may still require permits for these projects. Projects within the beds of Seasonal Rocks and Floating Structures
protected waters and wetlands not listed here require permits from the Department of Natural • Removed from water on a seasonal basis (before winter freeze-up).
Resources. . All components removable from lake or stream bed by nonmechanized means.
Will not be a hazard to navigation or endanger public health and safety.
The information in this brochure describes work that can be done waterward of (below) the ordinary high . Site is not a posted fish spawning area,
water mark without a protected waters permit. However, any work done landward of (above) the -Will not include fuel handling or sewage facilities.
• Is not used or intended to be used for human habitation, as a boathouse or as a marina.
ordinary high water mark is subject to approval from the local unit of government's zoning authority. * Allows for free flow of water ber -lth it.
Contact the local zoning authority for the requirements for projects done landward of the ordinary high
Permanent Docks {ors fades only}
water mark.
• Dock is a single linear structure not more than 6 feet wide.
BEFORE INITIATING ANY PROJECT, contact your local conservation officer or the Regional • Does not exceed 50 feet in length, or extend into water that is more than 4 feet deep,
whichever
Hydrologist by writing or phoning the appropriate regional office. Any work exceeding the above is less.
conditions and/or any work in protected waters without a permit is a violation constitute a -Will ° more than one dock per waterfront lot.
not obstruct navigation or create a water safety hazard.
misdemeanor and is punishable by imposition of fines up to 700 and/or 90 days in W. If there • Site is not a posted fish spawning area.
is any question w ether or not a c ke, marsh, or stream is a protected water or . Will not include fuel handling or sewage facilities.
copies of the D Protected Waters map are available for public Inspection at all D ` Is not used or intended to be used for human habitation, as a boathouse, or as a marina-
'wetland, • Allows for free flow of water beneath it.
regional and area offices, local mil and Water Conservation District offices, and the County • Lake must be 500 acres or larger if dock is built on wood pilings.
Auditor's office. • Lake must be 2,500 acres or larger, and site must preclude the use of a dock on woad pilings if
dock is built on rock filled cribs.
...Cant. to other side
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: E A , DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT%PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JULY 1, 1988
R: BERRY PATCH PARK - LAKE TRAIL
BACKGROUND:
Berry Patch Park was acquired in 1978-79 as park dedication for the Hill Top
addition. (Park Service Section 22.) The developer was also responsible for
installing a 5 foot bituminous trail. A portion of the trail goes along Berry
Ridge Pond, then goes between two homes following the shoreline, (with
dedicated park property) then back up to Berry Ridge Road; terminating at the
property line of Patrick Eagan Park.
ISSUE:
Without a controlled outlet the lake/pond known as Mooney Lake, continued to
rise above the established normal winter elevation. This was primarily during
the time period from 1981-86. Last year, a lift station was installed to
control the lake elevation. Pumping began in early spring to bring the lake
level back to it's planned level.
Because the water level increased without an outlet, the H tuminous trail was
flooded as did a significant number of trees. The trees died and a4 -he
neighbor's request, the Department removed the dead trees in February of this
year.
With the water level down to it's normal elevation the "aftermath" of the
flooded shoreline remains. The trail is in very poor condition and numerous
stumps and dead trees are exposed.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLAINTS:
Adjacent property owners have voiced strong objections and concerns with LSE
conditions. A meeting with these residents was held in May. As a result of
that meeting, the neighbors adjacent to the park property asked that the City
consider raising the normal lake elevation to as high a level as .possible
even if the park trail was main to be submerged.
Neighbors contend that the trail is not used and that no one vgzant ~he trail,
therefore, why keep it.
The engineering division has performed a review to determine if incr~:as~ in
the pond elevations - normal and high - could be done. AttL_'. it a nemo and
report concerning this possibility.
OPTION 1:
Engineering Alternate #1 proposes to raise the normal water elevation from
859.4 to 860.6. The high water elevation will remain at 865.2. The storage
volume will be decreased by 8.2 acre feet. The lowest point in the existing
trail alignment is at an 861.5. This alternative plac?s the normna1 water
level .9 feet below the lowest section of trail. The freeh,,,;x,rCJ is decreased
by 1.2 feet, therefore trail flooding will likely occur T~at t.,
~n ~~E 4~iqer
frequency storms. This alternative does allow for the iniE z ovcme.,nt 0 t1
existing derelict trail.
Staff recommends that the existing trail be removed and replaced. The
estimated cost for the trail improvement is $7,000.00. Also as a result of the
previous flooding, approximately 175 dead trees/stumps should be removed and
the shoreline improved. Staff estimates the cost at approximately $5,000.00.
OPTION 2:
Engineering Alternative #2 proposes to raise the normal water level from 859.4
to 863.3. The high water elevation will be increased from 865.2 to 867.4.
The storage volume will be decreased by 8.2 acre feet. This alternative will
continuously inundate the existing shoreline trail section leaving it
impassable. The result will be 2 existing spur trails that lie be-Neen the
homes leading to the flooded trail. This alternative does not all low for
pedestrian access to Mooney lake and removes a primary trail 'ink to Patrick
Eagan Park along Berry Ridge Road. In consideration to alternative 2 the
Commission will need to assess the value of the Mooney Lake recreational
resource and pedestrian trail. The neighborhood supports that the trail has
minimal use. In contrast, possibly the lack of use is based on the diminished
shoreland condition and unsafe trail. The trail access to Mooney lake was a
Commission recommendation with the Ni11Top Addition. Improvements would be
necessary with Alternate#2. First, the dead trees and stumps would need to be
removed at a cost of $5,000.00 Second, the spur trails would need to be
removed and restored at a cost of approximately $1,800.00. Lastly, the
flooding of shoreline trail section removes a link along the Berry Rild.~e Poad
pedestrian way to Patrick Eagan Park. A boulevard trail would nee=d to be
placed north of the Berry Ridge Road along the single family homes connecting
the interrupted trail link. This trail addition would cost approximately
$7,000.00.
OPTION #3:
Option #3 is to maintain and keep the control thigh water level and normal
water level as prescribed by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, the dead
trees/stumps would need to be removed at a cost of $5,000.00. Second, the
trail would need to be removed and replaced at a cost of $7,000.00.
SUMMARY:
The adjacent neighbors to Mooney Lake want the pond quality to be improved by
raising the pond elevation. They do not wish to see the trail remain next to
the lake. They say the trail has no value and gets little use. Needless to
what alternative is chosen, the fact remains that a trunk sewer pond, parkland
and pedestrian trail needs to be improved. The dead trees and broken trail
are a result of an uncontrolled trunk storm sewer pond. With the
implementation of the lift station this flooding should no longar° nccur
protecting both the vegetation and trail. Th C ---,sion ma;,,, con.'Jer "what
funding source is responsibly appropriate to ce;^r.::::, the current, s ituat for
Staff concludes that, subject to the Comlrii W sion's recommendation, the
improvement could occur this fall in order to detour liability and place into
operation the trail corridor if so recommended.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff is seeking direction from the Cc;rnrrr -lion prior to PEE et w t, tile..
affected residents.
The Commission may consider the alternatives, as presented in providing
direction:
1. To approve Option #1, Option 2, Option #3 or combination of the
above.
FOR GROUP
FOR
,.Where will be one key who will , ._i
of the residents of .ll to-) l o-
Lal i dj04n t'- _ ry -
b°° ^ly - ~
~
by _Y.
effect can the lk(, ~ l
options for olutj r i ame ie t._ _r t- jI_iI,_.I►q i ~i ll
be presented.
ddi-Io n llyr there will be wo subs: r
I' .--hc _
'f c, r] 3 incli: > _ he
T an speaker present ener< conc+ X 11 0
additional minW_. each the two i
needed to ddre~__ _ -r particular asst a; _ .
.
-.)r hi.- cppc, - L ° t-r --r - the c''
r- - + , m a - c -nt th-
MEMO TO: HONORABLE AYR AND CITY COUNCIL
TO HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM. KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS RECREATION
DATE: JULY 18, 1988
RE: OFFICIAL NAMES - PARKS
First, let me apologize for the long delay in advancing this memo to Coun-
cil. The Advisory Commission had reviewed this issue months ago, was
scheduled to be discussed at a possible joint Commission/Council 1.
Such an opportunity has come and gone, and therefore, hopefully ,'Ills mumu will
suffice at this time.
The Commission has reviewed possible names for an "official nan!e" for several
newjun-named parks. These recommendations are as follows:
1. Park Section 1 - Now identified as WinklerL ackscrm
Names Reviewal: Red Cedar
Slater Acres Park
Slater Park
Rationale.
The property had been owned by a member of the Slater family for
some 82 years and is adjacent to Slater Road.
Several Red Pines dominate the site and ad di Lional plaoni rya ion
Cedar Avenue is planned with the devei opm,ent,.
Recommended Name: Slater Acres Park
2. Park Section 31E - Now identified as Vienna Woods Park
Names Reviewed. Pin Oak Pond Park
Pin Oak Park
Pin Oak Trail
Kettle Park
Rationale:
Property had been owned in the 1800's by William Brown and James
Slater, and in 1912 by the Trapps for 38 years. Site has large
Pin Oak, and Pin Oak Drive is the street name which comes in from
the west to the park. "Kettle Park" was suggested due to the
glacial action which has created much of the topography of Eagan
and particularly this area.
Rrccn,r►ende : Kettle Park
1
3. Park Section 34 - Now identified as Oh ann
Name Rec o mended: George Chmann Park
Rationale:
Property was owned by Ohmann family for an 89 year perizol, and
when the City purchased the property we agreed that 0imlar.n Park
would be utilized in the name.
e a i ci_
4. Parak' Section 16 - No , r o s_s /Blu She
Names Reviewed: Skyline Park
Sky Hill Park
Spy Glass Park
Sunset Park
War Shield
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Park
Blue Cross/Shield Park
Blue Cross Park
Rationale:
Ownership changed hands from the Holts, to Bartle- to Finn to
Nichols and John W. Brown before being acquired by Bl-;, Cross, who
had owned the property for some thirty years plus. ilie "skylisno"
name comes from the wonderful view of the skyline o IMinnoapnl 's
and the Minnesota River Valley that tiio hif,h point, in Litz park
provides. To fully appreciate this name one only has
to go to the top of the hill in the park and look to the- r,orEh to
appreciate the view. Similarly, Sky Hill and Spy Glass coiie from
this view. Sunset Park comes from the beautiful sunset view.
Blue Cross from the road name - the others are obvious.
Recommendation: Skyline Park
Note:
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota have expressed an Interest in
seeing the park named after Blue Cross/Blue Shield be-c:ause of the
location of the park to their corporate headquarters, and LAhe role
they have played in seeing the park come about.
2
pied as lond land z
5 Pay-` Service- -eC ion 1 ~~~~~1_~
or Mueller Parcei
Names Reviewed: Mueller Farm Park
Mueller Park
Herman Mueller Park
Buffalo Head Park
Kestrel Park
S c a up Pa r k
Woodlands Park
Rationale:
The property had been owned by Herman Mueller from 1919 un w i it
was acquired by the school/City in 1985. Hence, Nl:'ellrr Park.
Other names come from features of the park. "Woodlai)CIc" L) Ioc a
possible name because of the a;ci-,001 and adjacc-0 su,bd on,
however it is felt that it is important to have a SePara' I en-
tity for the park to distinguish the park from Lhe yi.ing
recognition to the City and not just the School District.
Recommendation: Mueller Farm Park
6. Park service section 23 - Cqr :,!I _1, i dente fi ed__as Bridle-R- _ ? Id which relatee to the 18 acr ._-,ci tc~ odd irk
5uL sted s. Ed leover Park
Sawa i l ow Park
Wandering Walk Park
Meandering Swale Park
Stone Bridge Park
Bridle Ridge Park
Bridleridge Park
Brosnahan Park
Rationale:
The first four names are suggestive of the land form and shape of
the park. The others after the subdivision names. The last nawie,
was the owner of the property from the period from 1867 to 1946
79 years.
Recommendation: None made
Note:
A 2nd name for parkland in this subdivision may be to dis-
tinquish the park of 18 acres from the open space/grey) belt that
is adjacent to this park within the 2nd Addition now being
platted.
3
OEA U
TO: ADVISORY PAR A RECREATION COMMISSION
O : KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF e'I REC E~'TI
ATE: JULY 28, 1988
RE: L C K PARK PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS
On Tuesday, July 26th, Mayor Ellison, City Adi ~nistt-atoi D i' or cf
Parks and Recreation Vraa and Landscape ,r'. 7<<11 i~ Leo
Murphy concerning the need to acquire propert,,, ~~ces ?1 N.-,N =a+
Mr. Murphy was concrerned about the impact trai fic wuuid i,d'YG un his =erty
when considering future development. Further, the triangular purtiun being
severed from his parcel is what he considered of primary value. Staff pointed
out that this was approximately one acre in size and because of topograpl-v and
the vegetation, the development would be impractical, certainly un,~~f~o~,~
A sanitary sewer lift station would be required at this location, 'Mir,
also asked if the City would be willing to turn back to him acf,it""d
by MnDot north of the Conklin Road access. This one acre ,y f,r aka n
Deerwood and the Conklin Road. Mr. Murphy stated the
for this area to be used for residential development if a.. Fib
After considerable discussion, an understanding that the City would provide
for credit for parks dedication with the taking of approximately 3-1/2 acres
and consideration for the nDot turnback, Mr. Murphy stated h,. '--,uld co s ider
a package deal of this type. Staff requested approval of Mr to go
onto his property for the purpose of developing a legal
could then used, if agreed upon, as the parks dedication. 'n re
to this work being conducted by the City.
In summation, Staff feels that good progress was made with Mr. Murphy and a
better understanding developed regarding the park dedication credit and the
advantages to r. Murphy in proceeding in this manner at this time.
Staff will be directing consultants to prepare a lega' d - crintiotm 0
property so another meeting with Mr. Murphy and negotiLt-
Further, review of the MnDot turnback will be initiated.
L C K PONDS:
Also associated with the Blackhawk Park development is that of Blackhawk
Ponds. Staff has reviewed with the developer a road alignment into the park.
The concern by the developer has been expressed for the number of trees that
may have been lost as a result of the grading of the roadway. D('ail r
Staff has established that many of these trees can be saved but -1y v:
retaining wall. The first concept designs provided a reta', ,g v tt a <~~st
of approximately $30,000. Modification- trther r(-i c~
results in retaining walls which might be )nstructed at a t;i c:>t of
some $10,000. The effects of the walls will save approximately 10 _u 12 trees
w
which are of significant size to the area. Staff would like to review this in
some detail with the Advisory Commission to gain your approval for this plan.
DOT C UISIO
The Commission Members may recall, th- * end el Lak
property. This small section of pro[ _ which iti l y is a vp ' e
from Blackhawk Lake up to 35E is four cures in siz and is essent-i d
locked by park property. It has been the City's intent that we would acquire
this property as a turnback at a very minimal cost, typically $1.00.
As a result of the Blackhawk Ponds Additions to the south
~~~~~n
3rd Addition to the north, a water line needs to 'e~t, ~ s
MnDot property to service both parcels. Furt;
is looking for a temporary haul road of suiv,, _)u balance the two construction sites. This haul ro"a -__t„d ,n th': th,e
MnDot property. Seeking approval from MnDot for use of t,e property in this
manner has met with strong objections. Acquisition of the property for park
purposes has been pursued. After much and long discussions, MnDot has a;kod
their appraisers to consider the value of the property for sale to the Ciiv.
The Staff's understanding that an appraisal by MnDot o $20,000 for the 4
acres has been made. Developer or Blackhawk Ponds has indicr'. d his
willingness to pay for a signiflcanll ,ion of this cost if Ut_ -1 be
willing to also assist in it's
The Director has not been formally approached with such a request and has only
been discussed with the Director of Public Works.
Staff would like to review with the Advisory Commission their f ling fr, 0
acquisition of this parcel and whether the City should be i t
some of the costs for the acquisition of this parcel.
FOR O ISST ' rrnR:
1. No acii-n is necessary at this time relative to Leo Murphy issue.
2. It appears that an agreement with the developer regarding road location
and preservation o the trees with retaining walls has been met and
approval by the Advisory Commission is sought.
3. Discussion by the Advisory Co 7ission co ning p 1, a on inn e
cost of acquisition of the n o ast f 1 k,ha k Lai'ke
of approximately 4 acres be ji, , consiue 4iun.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS I N-CRE TIO .....A_. iTO
FROM: STEPHEN SULL' aL E.R/LAN[ISCAP ARCHITL.a T
DATE: AUGUST 1, 198&
E: STORM QUALITY
BACKGROUND
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission at the July 7th tin- ie,_;I:ed
that staff review the current status of storm water quality F E, L :gan ~d
provide information on storm water improvement methods for trunk storm se
ponds that occur within parks. Staff has found that currently two agencie>
are involved with storm water quality:
1. The Dakota County Soil and Water Conservai,
2. A Citizens Group which is currently estab: `uaIity
Management Plan for Eagan.
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL ATE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
The Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District currently 1'evi_,w all
development proposals within Eagan and makes recc.:. ndaticrs W 'J" P 0 1
control and water quality. The district makes c W : (1= r11
grading plans and makes recommendations in regards -x„ 01 1 ~ W
controlling any erosion which may occur. The the
following areas:
o Silt fencing
o Sediment basin
o Seeding & mulch
o Inlet sediment traps
a Lot benching
The District also has on staff a water qual i t - al i st. This oiersoln
utilizes a computer model specific to each dev apment. The computer
estimates pre-development phosphorous and the phosphorous load after
development. The computer makes recommendations on pond design to reduce this
nutrient load.
After an involved discussion with John Barton the Wate~ Quali{~,,;:..i~a~ ~s
with the Soil & Water Conservation District, staff f-1 the cm i's
concerns would be better addressed by him versus this r L. vs~~,=rs 6~tc~
will attend the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, and will
discuss the district's role in Eagan's storm water conservation and a,,-Iswur the
Commission's questions.
AT UALI AGE T L
Staff has provided you with a summary of the goals, objectives, i' P
implementation of the Citizens Committee Study for a Water Quality
1 ,
Pl an. Wayne Sames of the tdv = r a E~y Parks & Rec ' i Jon i
of the committee, and is a resource to th-, ssi~O"n' > questicin, . n
Barton of the Soil & Water Conservation DisLrict, also plays a strong rf;-1e
within this committee.
The introduction of the report indicates the six (5) steps to establish'in-y, t
Water Quality Management Plan. The committee is curre tly at :step € hie
process does provide a time after step #5 for allowing - ut in re,"'O rd !.o pored
classification discrepancies and the water quality m n piIH.
It is anticipated a public hearing will also o r prior to _!_zation
of the plan. Staff feels this would be the proper time t s i- input
regarding the compatibility of the Water Quality Plan and Park yst~ ; `lan.
SSjbls
Eagan Wetlands Classification Report
lL r}7t-rz ( ~ ~ety /at t'7 srr7- pI ,4,y
Prepared for The
City of Eagan
December 1987
Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District
821 3rd St.
Farmington, Minnesota 55024
.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Wetland Classification
III. Wetland Water Quality Standards
ICJ. Wetland Water Ouality Summary
V. Conflict resolution
VI. Summary
I. Introduction
The City of Eagan has over 340 waterbodies within i'..':s
corporate boundaries. These waterbodies are an
part of the City storm water conveyance system and t;, also
used for recreation, wildlife habitat and storm water
storage. The numerous wetlands also provide ideal sites for
residential development and help to make Eagan one of the
fastest growing suburbs in the Twin Cities Metropolitan
Area.
As development in Eagan increases, conflict between
recreational and storm water conveyance system use of the
waterbodies becomes more likely. In order to minimize the
potential conflict, the City of Eagan is developing a
comprehensive water quality management plan. The plan
development involves six steps:
1. Inventory of the waterbodies in Eagan;
2. Classification of the waterbodies by desire" i:=F
3. Development of water quality standards for eaci,,
waterbody use category,
4. Review of existing water quality data;
5. Monitoring of runoff water quality;
6. Incorporating the inventory, classification,
standards and monitoring data into a comprehensive
plan which outlines management strategies to meet
water quality goals.
Steps one through four of the plan development hav-»
completed. The wetland inventory and data review one
by the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation Dis"::ict.
The development of a waterbody classification system and
suitable water quality standards was also done by the Dakota
SWCD. However, waterbodies were assigned to a particular
wetland class by a volunteer committee consisting of
representatives from the City of Eagan, the MPCA, the DNR,
the Dakota S;,.CD, E. A. Hickok & Associates and four
interested Eagan residents. The wide range of personal and
professional interests and expertise provided by this group
helped to ensure that both the recreational and storm water
management needs of the City would be met. It is
anticipated that the classification of waterbodies will be
an ongoing process; charging to meet the changing needs of
the City as development proceeds.
The data collection phase of the plan will occur in
when E. ?1,. Hickok & Associates monitor storm water vo ur.e
and cuality from different land use types. This information
as well as the waterbody classification and water quality
standards scheme will be incorporated into a comprehensive
plan which will target high value waterbodies and outline
strategies for their improvement and protection. The wit-~r
quality plan will be written by E. A. Hickok & Associ-7tt_
wit'n assistance from The Dakota County S<,TCD. The pla -.ill
be completed in 1938.
II. Rrretland Classification
Preliminary Classification of 1.1aterbodies
The Citizens advisory committee developed a classification
system that described the projected use of Ea(-,~n
waterbodies. The following waterbody use clt were
adopted:
Recreational use:
I. Direct Contact Recreation
II. Indirect Contact Recreation
III. Wildlife Habitat
Treatment Use:
I. Nutrient Traps
II. Sediment Basin
III. Storm water storage
It was recognized that some of the waterbodies would serve
multiple uses. For instance, nutrient trap ponds will
probably also provide wildlife habitat. However, it wts;
also clear that some waterbody uses were incompatible with
others. For instance, recreational waterbodies cannot be
used as sediment basins because the inflow of untreated
storm water would degrade their water duality. It was also
obvious that physical characteristics, existing use and
location in the watershed would limit the use of many
waterbodies. The citizens committee, therefore, established
the following criteria to assign waterbodies to use
classifications:
Recreational use:
1. Direct Contact
If any of the following apply:
Eagan Park System Plan indicates swimming as
a potential use.
Existing water use includes swimming
Size >5ac, little perimeter vegetation and
visual assessment of water duality.
II. Indirect Contact
If any of the following apply:
Eagan Park System Plan indicates canoeing or
fishing as best potential use.
Li.nited shoreline access due to perimeter
vegetation, and/or degraded water quality
that would limit swimming.
- Existing use includes canoeing or fishing.
III. Wildlife Habitat
If.
- Pond bounce does not exceed two feet for a
one year storm.
Mixture of open water and vegetation.
- Lana use is conducive to wildlife.
Treatment uses:
I. Nutrient Trap
If. _
- Total drainage area / wetland acreage < 10.
- Total drainage area < 5 x wetland area.
- Forced main outlet is installed.
II. Sediment Basin
If;
- Storage potential of the pond the
capacity using Soil Conservation S(--,,vice
specification 350.
III. Storm water Storage
Ponds that do not meet the requirements of
the other classes.
After these criteria were approved, the StvCD , ] i - ie ~aC j
waterbody and the committee reviewed and approv(' the
classification.
After five meetings, all the waterbodies were classified to
the committees satisfaction. Color coded maps are enclosed
that reflect the committee's decisions.
The Color codes are as follows:
- Direct Contact - Light Blue
- Indirect Contact - Purple
- Wildlife Habitat - Red
- Nutrient Traps - Green
- Sediment Basins - Yellow
- Storm water Basin - White
A composite map (with all the classes) and individual cl<ass
maps are enclosed.
IV. Wetland Cuter Quality Standards
Water duality standards for Recreational / Aesthetic
waterbodies in Eagan were established using Carlson's
Trophic State Index (Carlson, 1977). The use of the TSI is
convenient because it presents lake water quality on a 0 to
100 scale. This allows for easy comparisons between
waterbodies and allows for the ranking of wetlands relative
to their quality.
Carlson (1977) uses three parameters (total phospho- s,
chlcrophyll a and Secchi disk depth) to cat7,oril"-
water body. Because the TSI can vary bets~c~ } pr..t.
Osgood (1982) developed a method to calculal, e.~,:r ~ ^I value
which would be representative of the quality of lake.
Osgood transformed the TSI for the Secchi disk to be more
consistent with the TSI for chlorophyll a and phosphorus.
The Citizens Advisory Committee, decided that water quality
standards be established using The Trophic State Index for
the Secchi disk depth, TSI(SD). The TSI(SD) standard has
the advantages of:
1. Easy and economical data collection;
2. A relatively large existing data base;
3. It reflects both algae growth and suspended
sediments;
4. Transparency is most strongly associated with
physical appearance and recreation rating of Lakes
(Heiskary and Walker; 1987);
5. The TSI (SD) can be correlated with both total
phosphorus and chlorophyll a;
6. Increases or decreases in the TSI(SD) can be
predicted using existing lake models.
A subjective characterization of Metropolitan Area Lakes and
the corresponding TSI's and Secchi disk depths are shown
below (Osgood, 1985):
Open Water Quality TSI(SD) D Death (ft.)
Exceptional 343's 26 - 13
Very Good 40's 13 - 7
Good 50's 7 - 3.3
Acceptable 60's 3.3 - 1.6
Poor 70's 1.6 - 0.8
Very Poor 80's 0.8 - 43.4
Severe limitations 943's 0.4 - 43.2
Utilizing the TSI (SD) , the water quality standards for waterbodies are as follows:
Class I - Direct Contact Recreational Use Water Body.
Standards - TSI(SD): Summer average not to exceed 50.
Fecal Coliform organisms: Not to exceed
207 organises oer 100 milliliters.
- Dissolved Oxygen: Not less than 7 mg/L.
Class II - Indirect Contact Rel rr~,at.ional Use
Standards - TSI(SD): Summer average not to ,xceed
70.
- Dissolved oxygen: Not less than 5 mg/L.
Class III - Wildlife Habitat.
Standards - TSI(SD): Summer average not to ex,
In addition, all standards determined for a Class A
waterbody by.Chapter 7050 of the MPCA rules shall apply.
Standards for treatment basins are based on design criteria
developed by walker (1987) and the Soil Conservation
Service, Nutrient and sediment removal efficiencies as
proposed are similar to those reported by Ferrara and
Hildick-Smith (1982), Wile, Palm <?_,~er and Miller (1981),
Harper (1986) and-Barten,(1982), `;or similar basins. The
use of nutrient and sediment removal rate standards for the
treatment basins has the following advantages:
1. Compliance with the standards can be determined
through the use of existing models;
2. Monitoring costs will be reduced;
3. The time frame for determining compliance will be
reduced;
4. The effect of compliance or non-compliance on
receiving water quality can be predicted using
existing models.
Utilizing the SCS and Walker (1987) criteria, the water
quality standards would be as follows:
Class I - Nutrient Trap
Standards: Suspended solids removal of 85-95%.
Total phosphorus removal of 60-75a
TKN removal of 20-40%.
Glass II Sediment Basin
Standards: Suspended solids removal of 60--70a.
't'otal Phosphorus removal of 40-50%.
` KN removal of 10-25%.
Glass III - Storm water Storage
No standards are proposed for these basins.
Analysis of existing data show that thn waterbody
classification system is in good agreement with the water
juality standards established for them. Six of the lakes
for which data is available do not neet the established
standards (Figure 1). Po;,rever, t`aree of the six waterbodies
are within six TSI units of meeting standards. Minor
reductions in nutrient inputs will probably re=duce the
TSI (.ND) to a level needed to meet standards. AssuTiny that
t5o data consist of a representative sample, it appears that
the majority of Eagan waterbodies will meet established
standards and the classification/water duality standard,;
scheme will be an appropriate methodology for managing Eagan
woterhodies.
The MPCA is currently developing total phosphorus criteria
for Minnesota Cakes. ;Since Eagan has chosen to use Secchi
disk death as a measure of water duality, the data was
analyzed to determine a relationship between the Se=cchi disc
depth of a lake and its total phosphorus concentration.
Pig ure 2 shows a strong linear relationship between the two
parameters. The correlation coefficient of the line was
det ormined to he 0.91, indicating that a prediction of total
phosphorus concentration based upon measured Secchi disk
Leath will be fairly accurate. This indicates that the
TSI (SD) standards established by Eagan will be adequate to
Determine compliance with the IPCA phosphorus criteria.
III. Wetland Water Quality Summary
A significant -amount of data was available for 22 Rag=
watev,rbodins. The average tr_oohic state index (TSI) for
total oho.;phorus, Chlorophyll a and Secchi disk n of
each of the waterbodieas is shown in 't'able 1. The TSI"s for
all of t5e waterbodies exceed the levels for eutrophic lakes
as established by the Environmontal Protection Agency for at
least one parameter:
TSI Total Phosphorus not to exceed 47;
TSI Chlorophyll. a not to exceed 55;
TSI Secchi Disk not to exceed 52.
The degree of eutroohy among the waterbodies, however,
varies widely. Holland, Fish, Schultz and McDonough Lakes
have TSI(TP)'s lower than or equal to 53, the level at which
nuisance algae growth would begin (Hiskary and walker,
1937). These four lakes would not be expected to exhibit
any major water duality problems.
Many of the smaller waterbodies such as Hauser Pond, Cedar
Grove Pond and Langhoven Lake have TSI values which are
indicative of severe water duality problems. The data
indicates that waterbody size is the main factor in
determining water quality. Figures 3 shows an increasing
TSI value with decreasing volume. This relationship is no'
surprising since small ponds often have water qualm -
si filar to that of the water flowing into them. u
pond receive most of their water from rainfall runo!'i, th(i-
water quality is poor. Larger waterbodies have the ability
to assimilate some sediment and nutrients and, therefore,
have better water quality.
Table 1 shows that the Chlorophyll a TSI is significantly
lower than the Secchi disk and total phosphorus TM's for
most waterbodies. This indicates that not all -f 'h-
available phosphorus is being utilized by the al This
may be a result of turbidity caused by bottom sediTtl t-.
resuspension or storm water sediment reducing algae growth
by shading. In some ponds, algae growth may also be reduced
by rooted vegetation.
Small ponds generally have a much lower ratio of Total
Nitrogen to Total Phosphorus (TN;TP) than do larger -ponds
(Figure 4; Table 2). A TN.TP ratio less than 15:7 411:Aicates
that nitrogen rather than phosphorus is limiting
growth. The implication of this is that initial phosphorus
reductions will only change the TN:TP ratio and not improve
water quality. Therefore, a much larger phosphorus decrease
will be necessary to improve water quality. Reducing
nitrogen inputs to lakes is usually not practical.
Figure 5 shows a significant decrease in the ,ter qua'i',
of Holland, Fish and LeMay Lakes from the e-1 197'11-
1980. This decrease is probably due to inc.. p!
runoff from urbanization in the lake watershe'
(Ayers.M.A.;et.al., 1983), The observed decrease in the
total phosphorus concentration in Holland, Fish and
Blackhawk Lakes after 1980 may be due to increased
groundwater flow to the Lakes which provided a source of
clean water and also raised the lake levels thereby dilutzng
the nutrient concentrations. The long term trend ir, -ir't, n
areas will be toward decreasing water quality unlp-s
adequate measures are taken to protect water resoir
V. Conflict Resolution
There are two areas of potential conflict that need to be
addressed in the development and implementation of the Eagan
water quality management plan. As shown in figure 1, some
of the waterbodies do not meet their assigned water quality
standards. Some of the treatment basins may also not meet
their nutrient retention criteria. This conflict between
existing waterbody condition and the classification f
standards scheme need to be resolved.
There are four options available to the City of Eagan to
address the conflicts within the classification/standards
scheme:
1. Improve water quality where necessary to meet
established standards;
2. Redesign treatment basins to meet nutrient
retention criteria;
3. Reclassify waterbodies to a type which will callow
them to meet standards;
4. Gower existing water quality standards and de-'3i,;n
criteria to fit existing conditions.
Selection of any of the four options has some inherent
problems. Reclassification of a wetland, for instance, from
a Type I to a Type II will restrict swimming opportunities
in the City. Conversely, attempting to improve water
quality to meet standards may be prohibitively expensive.
For instance, Burview Park Pond, which does not meet
standards, has a large watershed and presumably receives a
significant amount of nutrients in runoff water. The Pond
is also very shallow and has a low TSI(CHG) vs TSI(TP) and
TSI(SD) which suggests that internal recycling of nutrients
is significant. In addition, the low TN:TP ratio indicates
that initial phosphorus loading reductions will only
increase the TM:TP ratio and not improve water quality. The
cost of a lake restoration program will be high. It ; y be
better to target a larger lake like Thomas or Blac'rh<,-s,~~-,
which have similar water quality problems, for imp ov~r,f_nt.
This would provide more recreational opportunities at
approximately the same cost. The status of the waterbodies
currently not meeting standards needs to be addressed on a
case by case basis and the best management option selected
on the basis of Physical constraints, current and projected
use and financial limitations.
A second area of conflict between existing ady l_,nd
desired use is probably inevitable as the population
Eagan increases. Homeowners purchasing property adjac it to
a designated storm water storage basin will be unhappy if
algae scums with their accompanying foul odor develop on the
pond. The demand for recreational opportunities on lakes
will also increase as the population increases. This in
turn may.lead to a public desire for more recreational
lakes. In heavily developed areas the City may need to
increase storage in order to reduce storm water coni vance
costs or reduce flooding. The conflict between thec n^eds
and the water management plan also need to be resole
Resolution of the second type of conflict is more diffi:-ult
because it will involve disagreements between a c,ovo,rmE ,ntal
unit (The City) and the public. Minimizing thi -
conflict is the best approach to managing it. rNFlir. C<_Mi
done by making the water management plan, in part_icula~ t1he
classification scheme, available to City residents.
Developers and more importantly, future homeowners, rir<' to
be made aware of the probable water quality of the ponL'::
they are building beside. Providing adequate recreatinr~al
opportunities on existing Type I lakes will reduce public
demand for additional facilities.
However, conflict between uses of waterbodies will pzo~~3~~Ilr
still occur. In order to deal with this conflict, a
Advisory Committee could be established by the City Council
and be given status similar to a planning commission. This
committee could act as a sounding board for citizens
complaints, solicit input from City staff and other
professionals and then make recommendations to the City
Council.
VI. Summary
Correlation of existing data indicate that the propo,-A
classification/water quality standards scheme is l
to the Eagan waterbodies. The high correlation <,r ~_cf-rat
between the TSI (S,)) and TSI (TP) suggest that Lhe Lotal
iahosphorus concentration in Eagan waterbodies can >e
predicted from Secchi disk depth measurements. Using a
standard based on Secchi disk depth, therefore, appears to
be an acceptable and cost effective method of water quality
management for Eagan waterbodies.
In order to implement the water quality man11-- -,-ot pil-In, a
volunteer program should be established to :>r cc?~i
disk depths biweekly on the recreational us
This information can be added to the existir~ ca t.~ and
used to determine water quality trends. taaterl,odies not
meeting TSI (SD) standards should be targeted for additional
monitoring and/or restoration projects.
REFERENCES
Barten, J.M., 1986. Stormwater Runoff Treatment in a
Wetland Filter: Effects on the Water Quality of Clear Lake.
Unpublished.
Carlson, R.E., 1977. A Trophic State Index for Lakes.
Limnology and Oceanography 22.361-369.
Ferrara, R.A. and A.iilc~i smith, 1982. Ag
Approach For Stormwater Quntity and Quality C`on`_rol Via
Detention Basins. Wat. Res. Bull. 18:975-981.
Harper, H.H. and M.P. Wanielista, 1986. Design
Considerations for Stormwater Treatment in a Hardwood
Wetland. Paper presented at the 1986 NALMS Conference.
Heiskary, S. and W.W. Walker, 1987. Developing Phosph(-r,~a
Criteria for Minnesota Lakes. In press.
Osgood, R.A., 1982. Using Carlson's Trophic State Index
Values in Regional Water Quality Assessment. Wat. Res.
Bull. 18:67-74.
Walker, W.W., 1987. Design Calculations for Wet
Ponds. prepared for: St. Paul Water Utility and Va,`M- s
Lake Area WMO.
Wile, I., G. Palmater, and G. Miller, 1981. Use of
Artificial Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Pages 225-271
in Proc. Midw. Conf. on Wetland Values and Management
Freshw. Soc., Navarre, MN.
.
Table 1. Trophic State Index values for selected Eagan waterbodies.
WETLAND NAME CLASS T.- I -SD TS I -TP
LP-24 SCHULTZ LAKE I
JP-4 FISH LAKE I 49 5E 41
LP-38 HOLLAND LAKE I 50 52 5f
GP-1.1 BURVIEW PARK POND I 6 6S 1
DP-2 LEMAY LAKE I 70 67
LP-45 MCDONOUGH LAKE II 48 51 i
8P-1.1 DLACKHAWK LAKE II 61 68
AP-34 SLATERS ACRES POND II 64 75
JP-9 MCCARTHY LAKE II 67 71 .0,1
BP-7.2 THOMAS LAKE 11 68 69 E
LP-12 JENSEN LAKE II 70 65
ASP-8 EAST THOMAS LAKE II 74 71 55
LP-31 LAKESIDE ESTATE LAKE II 74 73 59
AP-11 BOESEL POND II 76 78
FP-8 SHANAHAN POND III 63 66
AP-3 CEDAR GROVE POND III 80 79
EP-1 DONALDSON'S POND NT 65 64
FP-5 HAUSER POND NT 73 69
1
DP-5 POND SW 3 61 :-AP-9 POND SW 67 7E
AP-1 LANGHOVEN LAKE SW 76 82 68
AP-10 POND SW 50
Table 2. Area, Mean depth and TN:TP Ratio of selected Eagan waterbodies>
MEAN TN:TP
WETLAND NAME CLASS AREA DEATH RATIO
ac ft
_
DP-2 LEMAY LAKE I 36 5.8 18
GP-1.1 BURVIEW PARK POND I 6.8 6 17
LP-24 SCHULTZ LAKE I 13 32
LP-38 HOLLAND LAKE I 32 19.5 33
JP-4 FISH LAKE I 24 9 48
AP-11 BOESEL POND II 12 5 13
LP-31 LAKESIDE ESTATE LAKE II 1E.E 5.4 16
PP-8 EAST THOMAS LAKE II 9.4 26
ESP-7.2 THOMAS LAKE II 42_' 4.9 26
AP-34 SLATERS ACRES POND II 4 3.5 11
LP-1E JENSEN LANE II 52 4 E2
JP-9 MCCARTHY LAKE II 88 E.5 C.)
BP-1.1 BLACKHAWK LAKE 11 29 4.3
LP--45 MCDONOUGH LAKE II 15.4 -
AP-3 CEDAR GROVE POND III 2.4 5.4 11
FP--8 SHANAHAN POND III 63 4.9 28
FP-5 HAUSER POND NT 1.8 1.7 16
EP-1 DONALDSON'S POND NT 7.4 7.5 12
AP-10 POND SW .7 3
AP-1 LANGHOVEN LAKE SW 3.4 7
AP-9 POND SW 5.5 14
BP-5 POND SW 7.6 10
i
,L3 A, 4 i,,3E,, E T . I':'i
9,r, _
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L~uiL i~l.
70
s ~AAH'AlA
CK)
3 tt !k'! ti L•~isrsd'i 4rtl•,_ps7 ~ I
~I L) L: IZ
Figure 1, Comparison of waterbody classification to established water quality standards.
i
T51-T r® 751 -
C
74 [ ❑ -
~i.
f._
`N
1❑ ❑
❑ 1❑
CJ
® ell
rte}
,54 -
C3
521 -
2 70 7 5
Figure 2. Plat of TSI(SD) vs TSI(TP) for Eagan waterbodies.
g
ET L 'j C,
Y _
h 4•~
SL LU it
r
Figure 3. Plot of Mean TSI vs Waterbody volume for Eagan wetlands.
8
71,17P 'Y"55 L4,KE AJRE4
m
}
El
r _
_ o
13
10
_3
v P
Tt,I;TF Tl ~r
Figure 4. Plat of T :TP ratio vs Waterbody area acres).
a
p T: 4(•TP) FF?Dtv1 1972 TO 19,55
- - - -
""•T ~ ° { £ 1st-, '"~J~~ ~s }a
r''(~j~ P l~ ~•~4... mow,,,,, '4'°d" C - .~~s1~' .r J ,F
i d B 4r a"I"i.v~ t~ ~ _ ~i ~r•#h ~
re' y ~R
C7♦ e ~F l p
f rBt
LL S c
'ill
a
a
+:rr
9li to d qr -
t ~ as a
~P $
f r
cep } 1% tar 'g,,~~ `f
- R f
~I
1 ~r
ti L;.J
1 *7 19,77'3' 19-74 1 T?~ 1 ? 1977 19713 1 1,3 I 1: J R 1
C',~: TF
Figure 5. TSI changes in Thomas Lake, LeMay Lake, Blackhawk Lake, Holland Lake and Fish Lake
from 1972 to 1985.
a
ETO: ADVISORY PARKS RECnEATION COMMISSION
FROM: STEVE SULLIVA, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
ATE: JULY 2, 1988
SUBJECT: SOUTH OAKS PARK - SANITARY SEWER ALu T
BACKGROUND
The neighborhood lying east of South Oaks Park is not currently serviced by a
public sanitary sewer. The neighborhood has requested sanitary service and
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anders ik & Associates have prepared pr_l im,~-ary plans to
provide this. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates 6a-, 3Ci;vide .-'tc
with two possible alternatives for the sanitary sewer ali-, nt -r oust, -j o
through South Oaks Park.
The Commission should be aware that the proposed sanitar° ~s
neighborhood had been designed to go through the park since the . ,,hL- ~.'s
development; and as recently as 1983 the residents rejected these ii',P.(-ov--~-.!nts
to their sub-division.
ISSUE
The Commission may consider which of the two alts ':;ity
of Eagan, or make an alternative F` o
ALTERNATIVE A
Alternative alignment runs across the soccer field. This alignment
increases both pipe length and depths. A rough estimate of th=e co--t is
approximately $45,000. No significant vegetation is impacted. =t:1
will sod all disturbed areas. The soccer field will be down f-r ''Y'OU
one month.
ALTERNATIVE
Alternative B alignment runs south of the beach and north of the playground.
This proposal includes jacking underground near the oak trees versus
trenching. No vegetation will therefore be lost. This alternative has no
impact on the use of canoe launch/beach. A rough estimate of the cost is
approximately $28,500.
U ` t
In the review of the alternatives the Commission should consider which
alignment may be in the best interests of South Oaks Park. Secondly, the
Commission should consider the financial implication of the cost of the
preferred alignment assessed over thirty-nine (39) lots within the
neighborhood.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider one of the following recommendations:
1. Alignment A
. Alignment
. Alternative Alignment
d
HJA f
dy"`
E
Paaudra~aT / Wac~oEra ~ 11/11I1I11, \
Raaa.areG
GRauNCs,
.,p LA
t y3' t
`"::rte
d4
40, Fu-AY AREA
T
E d
5
a
saK-C.Ea Fi
•E
t
d !
1
v
g
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : KEN , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: AUGUST 1, 1988
R: COMMUNITY CENTER - HASTINGS & CHIVETTA - DESIGN 1 WORK PRODUCT
Staff has received a partial report from Hastings & Chivetta Architects on the
site emphasis charette held on July 7th and 8th.
I have attached the, conclusions and recommendations page hat re or-1 as
well as the alternative site plans used to help itlr_trace tint: site
constraints, probable building size and preliminary program reports. (Please
excuse the quality of the graphics, as they do not reproduce well).
The intent of the first design charette was to resolve the issue of site
suitability and road access in conjunction with the Kingswood Second
Addition. To that end, the first charette drawing must be considered a
success; this and more was obviously accomplished. The f_;§ riil fern sthat the
site is adequate in size for a community center - allowinn nor '-,xpanl,Inn of
the City Hall, parking needs, access and circulation.
The Council has already acted upon the Kingswood Second Addition, by approving
the preliminary plat application which has a road alignment at the northern
most location in the Kingswood Subdivision. It also meets the desires of
Dakota County and the Highway Department for road access separation.
Staff would like to spend a few brief moments to re'vi ew the results of the
first charette with the Advisory Commission. A vio;d of cautic=i huv,3ever ,t
this time; this is a preliminary report. At the closure on July Sth, Staff
and Council members present provided some additional direction to the
architects for refinement. Consequently, modifications to this work product
have already been initiated.
The architects have also prepared a statement of probable construction cot.
This probable cost range is based on square footage at an c!^tinnted c^st per
sq.ft., by component type. The low estimate is $8,125,00,x, miidd : $9,7-80,000;
and high estimate $9,931,000. Again, a word of caution; there has bE-.en no
discussion about the building structural system, materials to be used, area
construction costs, nor detailed review of the square footage estimates as
were prepared. This is simply a first time projection. I would ask that the
Advisory Commission keep this preliminary number amongst yourselves - for the
time being - or until refinements are made to both program and cost
estimating.
Again, Staff will elaborate on the design charette at the Commission meeting.
KVJbl s
1
C Hastings+Chivetta
i
Site Emphasis Charette
Eagan Community Center
Conclusions and Recommendations
July 7th, 8th, 1988
1. The Municipal Center site is adequate to accommodate the proposed Co inifflit% ct.
2. Since relating the proposed Community Center to the existing City Hall and the t~>:istio L hi <r,
does not produce any significant sense of center for the Municipal Complex, it is recommccn;icd
that the Community Center be placed as far from the City Hall to the south side of the propQ,. Y as
possible in order to preserve flexibility for future development.
3. Although the Recreation Center will not be sited in such a way as to cnc i~.<oe
pedestrian interface between the municipal buildings, it is nonetheless desir li~' i-f~ h<< .':•Ic tur
improvements to automobile and pedestrian circulation on site.
4. It is recommended that the eastern most City Hall curb cut and the western most Library curb cut
on Wescott Road be consolidated.
5. It is recommended that a new curb cut be constructed onto Pilot Knob Road at the location of the
northern most option for the Kings Wood sub-division entrance.
6. It is recommended that the City undertake a Facility Needs Assessment to project future
requirements for City Hall and Police expansion.
e2_
Site Emphasis Charette
T-agan Community Center
Pry=iiminary Program Summary
July 7th, 8th, 1988
f
Hastlngs~Chivetta
July 2, 1988
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SUMM'VY
EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY UNITSIDIMENSIONS ARCS
I. Ice Arena
A. Ice Sheet 1 ~3 v0' 200 20,000 SF
8. Seating 1,000 @ 7.5' 7,500
C. Team Boxes 1 @ 5' x 200' 1,000
D. Team Rooms 4 @ 14' x 35' 1
E. Zamboni Room 1 @ 24' x 30'0
F. Refrigeration 1 @ 20' x 40' 800
G. Skate Change/Warming 1 @ 25' x 100' 2,500
H. Control Office 3 @ 15' x 20' 300
I. Instructor Room 1 @ 10' x 14' 140
J. Officials/First Aid 1 @ 10' x 14' 140
K. Storage 2 @ 10' x 30' 600
z
L. Public Restrooms 2 @ 12' x 20' 480
M. Concessions/Vending 2 @ 10' x 14' 280
a
SUBTOTAL (857) 36,420 SF
Circulation, Structure, HVAC (15%) 6,430 SF
TOTAL iz5(1 SF*
includes Jogging Track
64%
Ha, stings+ChIvetta
PRELIMINARY PR RAM SUMMARY
EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY UNITS D'~':
II. Activity Floors
c
A. Sports Room (net room) 90' x 25' x 12' 2,250 SF
B. Activity Gym 104' x 114' x 25' 11,856
(3 VB courts)
(2 BB cross courts)
C. Gymnastic Room
D. Weight Training 1, ?C) )
I
SUBTOTAL. (85%) 21,106 SF
Circulation, Structure, NVAC (15%) 3,725 SF
TOTAL 24,831 SF
Hasadingsill-Chivetta
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SUMMARY
EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY UNITS/DIMENSIONS AREA CSF)
III. Swimming Pool
A. Plunge pool 9' deep 1,256 SF
B. Main Pool 3.5' - 5' deep 5,(`00
C. Wading Pool 1.6' - 3' deep 2,000
D. Therapy Pools 2 @ 20' x 20' 800
E. Pool Deck 13,585
1.5 x water surface
F. Locker/Shower Rooms 2 @ 48' x 40'
SUBTOTAL (5%) 26,481 SF
Circulation, Structure, NVAC (15%) 4,673 SF
TOTAL 31,154 SF
Hastings+.Chivetta
t
i
PRELIMINARY PF'(_) "'A4 SUS ,,Vk
EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY UNITSIDIMENSIONS ARESFJ
IV. Multi-Purpose Rooms
A. Meeting Pooms 4 @ 30' x 37.5' 4,500 SF
75 people @ 15 SF
B. Storage Room 15' x 5' 375
C. Catering Kitchen 15' x 20' 300
D. Program Room/Tots Room
30 students @ 35 SF 1,050
SUBTOTAL (85%) 6,225 SF
Circulation, Structure, NVAC (15%) 1,099 SF
TOTAL
,.)a4 5F
tb 11
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SUMMARY
EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY UNITS/~')'Pfl' Fir
V. Office Area
A. Offices (10) 10' x 10' 1,000 SF
SUBTOTAL (85%) 1,000 SF
Circulation, Structure, NVAC (15%) 176 SF
TOTAL 1,176 SF
nivetta
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM SUMMARY
EAGAN MMMUNITY CENTER
MAJOR COMPONENT ACTIVITY ACRES AREA-(SF)
VI. Site Work
A. Lighted Parking Lots 2.58 112,500 SF
8. Drives/Roads, Sidewalks .38 16,400
C. Landscaping 2.75 119,790
i
D. Utilities Con-site? 300 LF
E. Grading 321,300 SF
SUMMARY
MAJOR COMPONENT AREA `S'Q
I. Ice Arena 42,850 `F
II. Activity Floors 24,830
III. Swimming Pools 31,155
IV. Multi-Purpose Rooms 7,325
V. Office Area 1,175
GROSS BUILDING AREA 107,335 SF
1345b/je
_ m
tl~ ,
t ,ro
t
t
f 1
+ + 2,
l.."L
17
r
- F
I ~
1 '
"
_ f {
a
/17
NA,
:3 s°
e -
9
~Y
t-
~ l
+r'~a
„1 _ ~TTT
j
.
t ~
c~
I ~s ~G
ILI
r
. ~Y
e
y
Mai
MEMORANDUM
TO: VISJ KS AND EATIWX COMMISSION
FRO E.. ' _ , DIRECTOR OF PAL.- ) RECRE, T
DATE: AUGUST , 1988
E: DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
1. Summer recreation programs have been concluding thi. As staff
reviews the summer activities, the following information i3 of interest.
Twelve pages of recreation offerings in the May issue of the City
newsletter created:
* 1,880 registration entries into the Lois system.
* 80 hours of clerical work to enter registrations and tsw, r,..f zn
activity rosters.
* $20,951 in revenue.
* 1,195 participants in summer in the park field trips.
* 800 Evening in the Park audience participants.
* 120 participants in adult golf lessons.
* 1 participants in Junior Team Tennis.
* 4 enthusiastic Domino's team tennis teams.
* 79 picnic kit rentals.
* 59 reservations at Trapp Farm Park pavilion.
* 24 reservations at the Trapp Farm she1(i-.
* 24 reservations at other shelter bui1=: z,;s.
* 994 regular season adult softball games.
* 196 tournament and play-off adult softball games.
* 17 home dates at Goat Hill for the Blue Jays.
* 40 youth baseball games at Goat Hill.
2. A special "birthday party" was held for Tiny Tots Recre<.O i cr r .?c vi ti es
on July 19th. Ten years ago the program was h-,-n frcti nch
article in the Dakota County Tribune, announci6q fP r~~' at
a cost of $3.00! Thirty-seven children regist . to
trace twenty of those tots who are now 13, 14 and 15 years ;f 12.
Three of them,Cathy Hatfield, Molly McIver and Matt Augustson came to
the birthday party, as did Dawn Simpson,the first program leader. (Dawn
has a 3 year old whom she plans to register for the program this fall!)
Trapp Farm Park was a beehive of activity for the party.
3. The Eaganettes were awarded first place in their c.=":
4th of July parade. A check in the amount of
money will be used to purchase basic costume it- f ,[;e it al
recital.
4. The Eagan Stagedoor Performers will pr= nt " END OF ` dE WORi w ml
August 18th, The air conditioned Hig "tug z °FF ~1t
will be the stage. Evening performances, curtain P.11., will be
held on August 18, 19, 20 and 25, 26 & 27. 3.00 P.M. m,'t-_nees will run
on Sundays, August 21 and 28. The group is to be ommended for
producing a second play just three months after "FORUM". Tickets,
$5.50, will be available through the department shortly.
5. A National Youth Sports Coaches Association Soccer Clin4,:
for 17 RAAA coaches. This was the department's
provide the program for RAAA. The clinic w,- t - c e~v,ef .
Additional clinics have been requested!
6. Burnsville Athletic Club soccer coaches will join EAA coaches at a NYS A
clinic next week. Burnsville Recreation staff will assist with the
clinic!
7. Fall program planning begins this week. Already "in the
adult fall softball league. Adult volleyball leagues will
.
begin play soon after school starts. The i rst date for1 C,
for fall programs will be Saturday, S 17th. S f w I be
looking to expand program opportunities for the community.
8. The Department now has long sleeve T-Shirts for sale. They n
white, powder blue or slate gray; 100% cotton. Depart logo or the
left "front". DISCOVER US! on the right sleeve.
9. The completion of the bituminous trail from Walnut I;i 1 Par r;, r
Farm Park this past week was don at a -t of $1., h,
Trail now extends from Nichols t arm a u~.. "0
4-1/2 miles. The developers oar the uakwood Heights A 3Ji ~ion and
recently platted Summer Place AJdition are required to ii-istall the
remaining portion of the trail.
10. Several trail overlays are being done as part of our bituminous trails
maintenance program. These include Bur Oaks and Ever_ -n Parks.
Carnelian Park parking lot is also being reviewed for an
11. Summer softball is quickly c inj to a close. ! :rtnu t
berths to district tournam nts begin this weeken_l i"or E",-ii], in L yue
teams.
12. Staff met with a group of young boys - 9-12 years of age - who are
interested in a "skateboarding park". Mayor Ellie had 'ev"ciiisiy
requested information on this issue. Mel Bailey is d r(. 7,, research
on liability, etc. for a report to the Commission a:.' vl-Y',
13. Staff submitted the 1989 budget request to the City dh,,zn' -ato
have had one review of the budge. Additional reviews arl-~~z~r=
14. The department has hired a Civil Tech to replace Bill Bradlee- John
Ranum has recently started to become familiar with the depar n-i<ent and
his projects.
r _
15. Residents of Bridle Ridge Addition are doing a Ong-t
to help them determine what priorities they have a - 'off of she
park. Staff will be meeting with the residents on Auv -t 9th to discuss
development plans for the park.
16. Maintenance staff completed installations of Carnelian and Quarry Parks. Also compl t d 3 gr
development projects at ' 1 ids and Rafe o S.
17. The old hockey rink on the Pilot Knob School , 3unds was remove is
being replaced with new rink in Pilot knob Park. This wor' is
expected to be completed in early August. An Eagle Scout will be doing
the final planting and staining of the rink, with fencing and electric
lighting to be contracted out.
18. Staff have continued their ins.-i <tion < c
container pads at several lr TI
Cross/Blue Shield, Cedar Pon:-~, i-nna aas, Coat Jill,
O'Leary and Fish Lake Parks. J h( se benches are commonly sit. r laW 7` C 'W
playgrounds, hardcourts, or points of interest within the park.
Container pads are being poured now, in anticipation of additional
concrete units being purchased this fall.
19. The Twin Cities Tree Trust crew compl ted the instal!
perimeter on 'he canoe launching p - O'Le-- l a
finished a --!ter on the T'- Lake
installing t perimeter for the Wands E1 n ary ~ iruc#Uur
20. The Dakota County Summer Youth Restitution crew has been busy on similar
perimeter installations. In July, they completed work on the Country
Home Heights, Carnelian and Lakeside perimeters. Their next prnj,,,ct
will be the installation of a perimeter on the Lakeside tiar no- s<arld
blanket. Both crews will be working in city parks through %upist
21. The dormancy of turf grass has led t h...' r, ~S iI m,,.,
but all three routes continue to mo~.: o:. "roue ~a~-~ - this s -
down has freed up some time to take advantage of other wii t.c-riaice ,s
in the park system. These crews have completed the painting of -11
hockey rinks (inside only) and the staining of all decorati
athletic field benches, picnic tables, and fishing docks at S- in
Fish Lakes.
22. A new sign program was implemented at Flee' -
old metal posts were removed and repl a,~ X
cedartone post. This has enhanced the app~arance 1 Niu, h 've
entrance and upgraded the park sign program to departs-ent star:la..~s.
2. Park attendants continue to serve group reservation and ball r
at orthvie, Rahn, Goat Hill and Trapp Farm Parks. Summer
were held in July at Rahn and Northveiw Athletic fields, the B1?w tys
finished the month with four games during the .in-1 Ji JIM L1
reservations were made for the pavilion an' It r ' 1 lit- z
Farm Park.
2. Forestry staff have continued to face head on the impact of 'nought on
park trees and shrubs. Since mid-June at least are, ;nd v -o
tankers have been out on a regular bUsi s U i vq w, '-han ^ , ~.W'01 (,02
newer trees. Despite this effort 7 ) re ..ill I r ,S ,
trees. In fact, the full impact w ? l _ t Ic`xi E.P111ir11g
when trees are given another ch,)Qns to. bud out.
25. Forestry staff are also busy with other miscellaneous tasks. Thee have
included: planting of evergreen trees at O'Leary Park, (to :~c' `>`e as a
screen between the playground and adjoining residences), planting of
trees at Fire Station #2, rehabilitation of plan.,i_~5_s ~;t the Fire
Administration Building, and installation of a P111HP' _.X r, °Park. Work on the tree inventory also continued uur l~h, t-i««.
26. Special efforts were made to keep the e -'1',f-rhood and athletic infields
in good playing condition. Many infields were regraded an1 aglime
washed off the grass to prevent turf damage. In June the D-° `4-1ent
took delivery on a new Cushman truckster that will be used for a variety
of purposes including ball diamond maintenance, irrigation installation,
and other miscellaneous maintenance and construction projects at
athletic sites.
27. Mid-season fertilization was made to the pl:. ~~,D t ill and
Northview Parks. Other fields that were sc( 7_j lization
were canceled due to the drought conditions.
2. The trails maintenance portion of the five-year bituminous plan was
implemented in July. The four foot trail at River Hills Park was
replaced with a new eight foot surface. Trails at Blackhawk, Evergreen',
and Burr Oaks Parks were also overtax d.
2. The department took delivery on a Triplex riding This is a
rotary type mower with a 66"cutting width. It's smaller ize ar. fEiwh
quality cutting will make it a useful tool for "finish mowing" in lgih
visibility areas such as City Hall, athletic infields, Community Cenet',
and so on.
ai'1i 'ix ~d aL
1- TOM
t . ` 550 26,183 64,130 34p97 11876 t,6,270 ,6~
. 551 4,164 192,891 35,329 316 463,0rT 50~,Ooo )
552 102,620 147,895 165,114 20,501 20,414 4!,,U) ,4')d
' 553 125,153 -11846 +51 199, ` 7,036 ~",ti;u ~ 3 r 4
554 8,8U3 ~~}s8 l~ a 1,550+;;) /;k tl
555
GtG 555 1; i 1216, 10 1 13,469 '
T'a2 OAK 557 8,151 257
C n` SON 1558 47
_'LTA1 559 61 110,167 24,893 135,1-: I 7
560 3,563 114 92,723 w ;6 29,381 250,'s< ? .
C I ICND 561 V? 269 1
O-JNTR)( HOW 8''
C'j "o I I ,
7 i^ y i1
X11 )4-_<
8,~t~i lgsji 21g~
I f UKE 46,380 1,511 47 OU, ; a
HIGIVIEW 567 8,300 3,029 (o3, "'RW PCND 568 1$ '3 `Iu, OJO (li , c-)
569 304 4%532 31991 53,827 g -10 .
LE- xT 1 570 61! 1 1,971
71 7 , 106 20,110
10,104
401 , a _ R , r 1
p T KNOB 74 123
RIDC [1l~u' 575 )7 45,215 16,9 32,0 TO RIUI X76 6, 5uO 2,358 21 tS, F t ti I . ,
17 14,789 46,841 8,347 59,977
36 36 1 I Yrr STATIOR
U4 580 8,050 2, 30 12$9,1 2,150 "31 17
I
s~ 463 4, ! , C ) A 1 g ;,a)
.,..L 4,742 115; ,3
IM' 1M 'J 11,124 fUY, i j
79,024 9155
.
Tom 3i J, 918,024 1,6151655 .1,335,8`,~ 121,r,°9 4}..64?~1e
J
NT
D '
3830 III
EAGA T, MN. 5,i1 z 1
F: Recreational Facilities _a. ty I
and f user of of
'.li.ti.e i the City, I wot ' i li.
L i the c ty athletic field for
the C
re
~ p
the'. 'f f thf
cti.on of the letic event itself.
i
'ISO,
ll cni
'he
y center 1 to
h'.etie eves ap to ei
ri t for 3u t to
u sure that q
Z l 1o t> a your
ld provic w
L Ya
art
z u
?o~
O: ADVISORY PARKS AND E "CATI 0= ? 131
61" 0M EL BAILEY, PARKS I AT 10 I
DATE: JULY 29, 1988
E: EG PARK REPRESENTATIVES
UPDATE
The purpose of this memo is to give the Commission a progress r r°t on -L-
neighborhood park representatives.
Monday, July 25th, was the inaugural meeting of the "unofficial" organization.
The turnout was excellent, of the 1 representatives that volunteered, 18 were
present.
There were various topics covered at th- rr-etinp- Curren,. of the
parks, maintenance and inspection pros ~~.~:tion p' c"~xi~ .,g issues,
park development procedures, and expected repres, Kati ve rol c . wl-re the main
issues reported by Chairman Carroll and Staff. A question and answer period
was used to wrap up the meeting and there was good feedback in the form of
discussions with staff. Commission members Masin and Swanson were there in
supportive roles.
A letter was recently sent out thanking the representat -s ~ntt r e'
meeting and that the park department was looking forw-r 4w fi~ a "nd
useful relationship.
Recruitment
The most recent count of representatives now stands at 2. That leaves only
selected parks without representatives. I recently submitted an article to
the local news media naming the parks still in need of volunteers. P so, the
Fall Eagan News letter will contain an article stating that the r and
Recreation Department is still in search of representatives.
'itional Comments
The next park representative meeting will most likely be held in late
September or early October; this will enable the parks department additional
time to recruit the remaining volunteers needed, and also be after the prime
fall vacation period.
1
Commission Discussion:
Staff welcomes any comments the Commission might have regarding this
organization. Following is an updated list of some potential goals and
objectives of the organization.
Goals and Objectives
1. Assist park department in the awareness of m,-
2. Curtail vandalism.
3. Bring to light some concerns residents have near the parks r }r sensed.
4. Liaison between Parks & Recreation department and neighbo-h, 4 r
5. Bring enforcement needs to the attention of the parks depart-: nt.
6. Early detection and reporting of tree problems to the City Forester.
7. Information source for the Parks Recreation Advisory Cs „i--ion.
. Bring developed needs to the attention of the P<,,ts & .:-.,a-ior
meat.
. Assist in the betterment of the Eagar
Input is needed on whether to concentrate on these goals and objectives or to
expand or reduce them.
2
AG PARK REPRESENTATIVES
PARK VOLUNTEER TF PH-Q.NE
1. BLACKHAWK PARK John Fpp'i e (H) 452-5290
3856 Riverton Ave.
Eagan, N 55122
2. BURR OAKS PARK Jean Schroeder (H) 452-3352
570 Chapel Lane
Eagan, MN 55121
3. CARLSON LAKE PARK Robert Sandeen (W) 643-2649
1304 E. Balsam Trail (H) 454-5784
Eagan, N 55123
4. CARNELIAN PARK Maureen Janke (H) b-535-6267
1790 Taconite Trail ('W) 297.4956
Eagan, MN 55122
5. CEDAR POND PARK Linda Palmer (H) 452-7803
2065 Emerald Lane
Eagan, MN 55122
6. FISH LAKE PARK Stella Lund'q Gst (H) 452-9300
1360 Dresdon Ct.
Eagan, MN 55123
7. GOAT HILL PARK John Uebel (H) 452-8437
4392 Capicorn Ct.
Eagan, MN 55123
. LAKESIDE PARK Cindy Furrer (W) 835-9933
542 Atlantic Hill Dr. (H) 454-6103
Eagan, N 55123
9. MEADO LAND PARK John Schmidt (W) 831w6500
1910 Bear Path Tr. (H) 454-05?6
Eagan, MN 55122
1
10. OAK CHASE PARK Phyllis Ligman (H) 454--2960
4374 Garden Trail
Eagan, MN 55122
11. HMANN PARK Joe Miller (H) 681-9009
4640 Fairway Hills Dr.
Eagan, MN 55123
12. O'LERY PARK Richard Meyer (W) 725-1297
1181 Kihi Wake Cir. (H) 688-8114
Eagan, MN 55123
13. PERIDOT PATH Cherryl Mesko (W) 454-8100
3995 Peridot Path
Eagan, N 55122
14. PILOT KNOB PARK Sandra Meyer (H) 45Z-8963
3058 Woodlark Lane
Eagan, MN 55121
15. QUARRY PARK Jeff Michaels (H) 452-1176
3233 Donald Avenue
Eagan, MN 55121
16. RAHN PARK Benita Soller (H) 454-3397
4259 Limestone Dr.
Eagan, MN 55122
17. RIDGECLIFF PARK Mark Ochs (W) 896-0596
1797 Covington Lane (H) 681-9207
Eagan, MN 55122
18. SOUTH OAKS PARK Phil Sherwood (W 1-~400
676 N. Hay Lake Rd. (H) `P6-5673
Eagan, MN 55123
19. VIENNA WOODS PARK Dale Klossuer (H) 688-2984
2025 Pin Oak Dr.
Eagan, MN 55122
20. WALDEN HEIGHTS PARK Jackie Taylor (H) 454--415
1485 Thomas Lan (W) 4°s1- 110
Eagan, MN 55122
2
21. WALNUT HILL PARK Deb Haupt (H) 452-4910
1067 Tiffany Dr.
Eagan, MN 55123
22. WINKLER JACKSON PARK Mary Packwood (H) 890-4616
2170 James S.
Eagan, MN 55122
Ahmad (H' 894 757
-7 Slater Ct. (W) 481--7642
Eagan, MN 55122
23. TRAPP FARM PARK Cathy Batholet (W) 829-8771
781 Cougar Dr. (H) 452-2096
Eagan, MN 55123
3
I
s
s
51 .
-Ca.:am 'tt' P
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21149 VIC E__ -,ON
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 n
PHONE: (612) 454-8104 1
Co
T C E S
July 28, 1988 / ,in r
EUGENE VAN O1 BEKE
Clay Clerk
Dear Park Representatives;
The Advisory Commission Chairman Dick Carroll and I were very pleased with the
response and interest that was shown at our first park representatives meeting
on Monday evening. It was very obvious that we have an excellent group of
individuals who are very much interested in Eagan and Eagan parks!.
Based on the questions that were asked each of us, it is apparent that the
main interest is for development or planned development in each of the
individual parks and how you can be more effective in reflecting the views and
concerns of your neighbors. Another issue seemed to be how each irdividtlal
park played a role in the overall system of parks. That is, hors comrl,un i ty
parks, neighborhood parks, special use parks, etc. all must fit together in a
balanced approach to meet the collective needs of the community.
At a future meeting we will devote some time to the specifics of development
and individual parks as well as to the issue of how all the parks need to fit
together as a system.
One of the suggestions we received, is the publishing of your natles in, tI" e
next City newsletter along with an article explaining the park representative
program. This would make it easier for you and your neighbors in
communicating. If you have any thoughts about this, please feel free to
contact the department.
Again, should you have any questions about the program or about you: park,
please feel free to contact any of us. John VonDeLinde's office phone number
is 454-5220, whereas the number for Dorothy Peterson, Steve Sulli-',are, and
myself is 454-8100. Cherryl Mesko, Department Secretary can also ci)annel your
questions if we are unavailable at the time of your call.
THE LONE OAK TREE., .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Once again, thank you for your attendence and continued participation. We
have already identified some to 1 issues from our meeting on Monday night
that will require our follow-up and attention.
Sincerely,
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks and Recreation
KV:cm
cc: Mayor Vic Ellison
Chairman Richard Carroll
City Administrator, Tom Hedges
Department Staff
PARK IMPROVEMENT STATUS
CARLSON LAKE PARK
Carlson Lake Park is defined as a Lakeshore park, versus neighhor ood com-
munity or special use park. Immediate plans provide for the lo;wation artd in-
stallation of a backboard for basketball, in conjunction with storirl sewer
upgrading. This work is now underway.
The short terms plans are improvements to improve turf quality ands the desire
to install a trail along the south side of the lake, extending from East al-
sa Trail to approximately Carlson Lake Lane, o the west. This will require
negotiations for of an easement from one property owner in order to accomplish
this. The trail would be bituminous design and have two or three benches
overlooking the lake. Access from East Balsam Trail will be from, switchback
trail requiring special design and construction. them has been sonle
sion about the need for playground equipment, o: ':he samE~ ,ca lle as that which
is located in Oak Chase Park, being installed near the, basketball backbo1r°d.
A small dock has also been planned. No definitive timeline has been
developed for this work, although there is a desire to have a neighborhood
meeting to review these improvement projects this Fall.
CEDAR POND PARK
This park can be defined as a "community park". It's main use is to provide
for open space and visual attractiveness. The park is used p~ i.12riy 101,
trail walking, observation and relaxation. Recent improverflents to the park
include landscaping, overlay to the bituminous trail, perimeter retaining wall
around the pond area and installation of benches.
Planned improvements to the play equipment are envisioned and funds escrowed
for this work. Special design will be required to re-install and uipq rade the
timber walking area adjacent to the playground equipment. The final desigF)
for this park work is planned for the Fall or Winter of 1988/89; installation
is projected mid-year 1989.
Long term improvements suggest ballar type lighting around the trail system
and flower gardens for color.
LAKESIDE PARK
Lakeside Park was under grading contract in 1987, with installation of
playground equipment completed in early 1988. Due to droucht conditions
through mid-year 1988, reseeding of the entire park may be regi_~iredi. As a
result, the park would not be placed back into full service unt s eery late
1989, or 1990. Initial improvements include landscaping material and con-
struction of a suitable ball stop. Landscaping was originally scheduled to
commence in the early Fall of 1988, with first phase; second phase to take
place in subsequent years. Drought conditions has placed this planting
timeline in question.
1
OA
This park serves as a neighborhood classification and will t rov i de so;r,o com-
munity facilities. The bid opening for the park was Jule 11th, the an-
ticipated completion of grading, seeding, and parking logs work is scheduled
for late 1988.
Construction plans provide for the complete grading, seeding and trail instal-
lation, parking lot and main feeder lines for irrigation to soccer fields.
Horseshoe courts are planned within the hundred year storm ponding area
required for storm water management plans. Surface development of the park is
not scheduled until 1990. Utilities to the park will be completed with the
final phase of the Fairway Hills Addition, consequently the construction of
the park shelter building has not been determined.
RAH PARK
Two distinct portions to Rahn Park are (1) the athletic fields off of Nichols
Road, and (2) community park - from Sandstone to Rahn Road.
(1) Athletic Fields
Athletic field development was completed in 1987, with dull use in 19,88.
Drought conditions of 1988 have excellerated planning ~~tcaits Or ir°rfs; tip _rt
of the athletic fields. Planned improvements to thi a provide for t.1fe in-
stallation of playground equipment near the existing park shelter building.
Detailed planning will be required, and installation is not planned until the
results of this work are completed.
2ommunity Park
As a result of the Cliff Eakef Gal 1 eri a development, lark wi l 1 have new
parking for approximately sixty (0) cars on the old Ra!.n Road Street. Also,
planned for 1988 is construction and continuation of the bituminous trail link
extending from the tennis courts to the gravel parking area and then to Rahn
Road. The gravel parking area now in existence at Rahn Road is to be
eliminated under this plan. Staff hopes to have this work completed in 1988,
but may be delayed until 1989. I cooperation with Rahn Elementary School,
the City will be installing playground equipment adjacent to the school/park;
installation to be completed by labor day.
Improvements to the park shelter building have been phased in over the last
two years, additional improvements necessary includes doors and windows, as
well as restroom improvements. facade on the roof is planned and necessary,
at the time re-roofing of the park shelter building becomes a necessity. The
time frame for this work has been determined and it is probable that such work
will be done in 1990 - 1992.
Improvement to the existing hockey rinks will also be necessary in 1989.
2
TRAPP FAR PARK
Trapp Farm Park is a community park designated primarily for picnic//w ri tQr use
activities. Installation of playground equipment is lon~i a. ,fu'e; it was Lhe
original intent of the City to install by mid-summer o~ 198 The scheduling
of this work until the Fall of '88, or spring of 1989 s ,etens al st E;nevitable.
Additional plant material is planned and a trailway from Daniel Drive to the
park is also anticipated. The timeframe for this work has not been deter-
mined, dependent upon Lexington Pointe final platting.
The east/west trail beneath the powersines extending frol,r Walnut ill to the
west boundary of Trapp Farm Park is also in the long term plans.
The trail along Wilderness Run Road extending from Wal ntUt HIM 11 Park has been
approved and should be completed by August 1st; additional trailwork will be
done along Schwanz Lake to Dodd Road, and is expected later in the year.
SOUTH OAKS PARK
Development of South Oaks Park is essentially completed, although turf im-
provement will be necessary. The completion of the retaining wall ~S n-
ti ci pated to be completed by August 15th of this yearr. Future plans ve
provided for space for a single tennis court, should the need ari~,a. ins.al-
lation of such a court is not foreseen in the immediate five Year period.
As a result of a storm/sanitary sewer project to service South Oaks Addition
there will be disruption to the park this year.
VIENNA WOODS PARK
Grading and construction was completed in late 10,`16. Like other parks, the
drought of 1988 may very well have affected the success of seeding of this
park. Reseeding may be necessary late this year. Hardcourt surface and the
trail are now usable, and installation of playground equipment in 1989 is
planned. First phase planting was also planned for this year, but may be
delayed until 1989.
As a result of a recent plat application to the north, th;ere will be an Ennpact
on a portion of the park and pond required as part o he 7,ty's CoMprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan. Regrading of this area, will creat - e a dr, p: nd. No final
time frame for this work has been made; it is subject to, V-;e developer's
plans.
INKLER JACKSON PARK
The park is to be under construction in 1988. The neighborhood park will
provide for an open play/ballfield area, trails and picnic grounds. Surface
development of the park, including playground equipment, is not expected unk-
til 1990 and 1991.
MEADOWLANDS PARK
Grading of Meadowlands Park was completed in 1986; plant material installed in
1987. The ballfield is expected to be fully operational in 1989. Installa-
tion of playground is expected by September of this Year. Plans provide for
the installation of two to four horseshoe courts which may be completed in
1989. Additional acuistion of property to the south of the existing park
boundaries is anticipated, allowing for expansion of the trail system to the
south. A "plaza area" is also expected to be construicted, but no x imeframn
has been determined. Hopefully, it will be completed by 1990.
IGECLIF PARK
Surface development to Ridgecliff Park was essentially completed with the in-
stallation of tennis courts in 1987. Poor sub-soils have resulted in dif-
ficulties with the park relating to growth and maturation of trees and :Shrubs.
Planned future improvements for Ridgecliff provide for a park shelter build-
ing, a mowed grass or wood chip trail connecting to the Leba'^ot Ells P,ec ~ anal
Park. The open space area immediatelty to the west of John),) Ca'.e idae rlload,
planned as a soccer field, will require extensive re-grading and fiif .~f. this
is to be used successfully. There have been no discussions or coat€m.plation
of this work until other park system priorities have been met.
GOAT HILL PARK
Goat Hill Park has been defined as a community athletic facility and is essen-
tially at full stage development, other improvements to the park are Con-
templated. Installation and improvements to the batting cv+.ge and additional
plant material are expected to be completed by 1989. Clean-up and maintenance
of the area adjacent to Lexington and Wilderness Run Road.
PILOT KNOB PARK
Plans for Pilot Knob Park include the completion of a new hockey ririk and
lights for the 1988/89 skating season. The main activities will be augmenLled
by a "temporary" trailer-type unit as a warming house.
Tot-Lot play apparatus has been considered for installation near the tennis
court area. Also considered in the overall planning for Pilot Knob Park is an
upgrading of the trail to the school, a walk-out dock/water sampling station;
and to be done cooperatively with the school - improvements to the existing
open play area for a second backstop for ballfield use. This is generally in
the location of the now removed hockey rink.
WALNUT HILL PARK
Installation of the hardcourt play area in 1988, and the comipletion of the sun
shelter essentially completes the Walnut Hill Parks develcp~,<<eQt. Com!)Ietion
and extention of the trail beneath the Highline to Trapp Farm Park is still a
viable objective, although a definitive timeframe has not been established.
4
BUR OAKS PARK
Bur Oaks Park is in a period of transition. The north portion of the park is
an older established park, while the southern two-thirds of the park is a
recent parks dedication. The park property was received from the Harstad Com-
panies in 1987. Under the development agreement, the develop r is also to do
parks grading and clearing of the site making it suitable for surface
development. The original timetable proposed by Harstac7 C ies was to have
the park completed by the Spring or Summer of 1987. Howc,t , Jue to the slow
pace of home construction within this sub-division, the developer has not
proceeded at the pace he originally intended and the completion of the grading
and seeding is not expected until the Fall of 1988, or Spring of 1989. Depen-
dent upon the speed of which this work is completed, the City will be install-
ing new playground equipment, backstops, and a trail connecting the tlMo, park
areas. In addition, parks planning efforts will have to be initiat rd [0j, the
older park area in order to upgrade facilities i _ r ti~ri, ,:~t Lhe
park and ensure an adequate trail connection between i ~c ivi'Lw gees.
Before work can begin there will be a necessity of sor,. d, '-.il,!d plarwninc and
preparation for construction documents. The good news 's that unlike some
park areas, funding has been set aside to accomplish many of these surface
developments.
O'CEY PARK
Extension and construction of the park took place in 1987, with grading, seed-
ing, installation of trails, hardcourts and tennis courts. Undler construction
in 1988 is a parks shelter building. This covered facility will provide for a
picnic area. Installation of a second playground unit in the northern portion
of the park site is planned for the Spring of 1989. This park has been ad-
versely affected by the severe drought conditions and reseeding work will be
necessary this Fall. The first phase planting has also been delayed in the
northern portion of the park, and should be under way in the Fall of 1988, or
Spring of 1989. Future plans for the park provides for trailway connections
to the commercial area to the north, and for a trail connection to the
residential area to the west. This will complete a r~ of circular walk
routes.
ERIOT PATH
Peridot Path was first identified as a "park" in 1981, and the original inten-
tion of this property was to act as a storm water retention and flowage area.
The property has since been reclaimed for open space and parks designation.
The parks department several years ago installed playground eqo¢ rient on the
north end of the park and has since maintained the property.
Long term plans suggest a trailway connection through the park north to south
and as a possibility a bridge connection over the drainage swale. Interest
has also been expressed towards filling in and grading of the area adjacent to
Cinnabar. With sufficient material this area could be sculptured into a small
play area and with new plant material add to the curb side appeal of this
park. No timeframe has been established for any of this work; other work
priorities within the park system have and will continue to take precedence
for some time.
LE HEIGHTS PARK
The City owns approximately 4.5 acres of property south of Cl i i f Road k-Je f-
tified as "Walden Heights". Plans provide for thi ark to e:vpa,d, 3n s17e Lo 9
to 10 acres, with a future land dedication to tip -G.
The owner, r. Brown, had presented a preliminary development plan fur the
area over a year ago, but has not proceeded further. Timing for the acquis-
Lion is uncertain, and therein lies the timeline for parks development.
LCKHAW PARK
Blackhawk Park is a community park and planned for deve'cz as a
picnic/community events park.
Additional property was acquired a year ago bringing total acreage to ap-
proximately seventy (70) acres. A south access needs to be acquired - ap-
proximately three (3) acres from Mr. Murphy. The City has submitted a Grant
request for funds to help develop the park; a preliminary indication is that
the City has been successful in obtaining some assistance.
First Phase development will provide for a roadway, park-in I{l t raIIs,
bridge over Blackhawk Lake at the narrows. A major par'K e-l `er hj.4?' ainEg
similar to Trapp Farm and Thomas Lake is also expected to be corns,°ucted. An
open-play space for games and field play will be provided and will be in close
proximity to the shelter.
A 1989 start for construction was tenatively set, but because of delays in
Grant funding and south access acquistion, the actual construction may not
begin until 1990.
6
i
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21149 VIC ELLISON
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Mem rs
THOh i i cS
July 2, 1988 City. ~r
EU( )VE
t ,
Ms. Evelyn Kjorlin
Principal of Rahn
Elementary School
4424 Sandstone Drive
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Ms. Kjorlin.
I am sure that you are aware that we have commenced the installation of the
playground equipment at Rahn School. In fact, we have completed nearly 1/2 of
the installation at this time, with expectations that we will be able to
complete the project the second or third week in August.
Steve Sullivan, our Landscape Architect, who is responsible for the ;.project
has encountered some minor problems. This has resulted in some adjUstment.s to
the site plan from what we had originally envisioned, although they are very
minor indeed. I am sure that if we didn't call this to your attention, you
would probably not be able to visually detect the difference.
We have previously discussed the idea of having a "grand opening" for the new
playground equipment. Presumedly this is something you will be coordinating
with school activities. If there is anything this department can do to help
with such an event, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks & Recreation
KV/bls
cc: George Fryman
THE LONE O TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF ->4 D GRO1`4 4 - ' P C 0,1MMUNITY
r'
P think _j
rn en Uv.-.d}
isn't Dugh)
afa , t . , come to and worry
Wildcr jxa,,. an . . I's East Side. about them."
Sev, t:,l but red of them play daily "You're fini,h a ,tthe girl Susan Sell, 'tatrr t p ,wk
n parks tluoughout the Twin Citiesc asked . u hr., , mt. h in sui~ t vii r
Recreation workers there often know cha , a +ncp r n ,i;,~s I❑;
"Chem we" ^^d even have a name for wic
them: p; -
Andt m. It t,.. :,n th
the
n
1 t I rhnu l i:ul t I,
n.
L1f ih 4 1 y,"il ;t,.ur I tie r1 <t W,LI
.
u u , e 4 G . to. at $ o'clock,' n. uy
I"c~ e~ ; a fr>earwld girt F1 I- r h,., trowx iagiPs 5 p.m.7 -
who says her mom puts her in charge c..th.r.esr,uCnu,alnnpaar~
l
Chi[ Continued from page IB a
en I-wh day, There are older chil. all right for kids to be out on tt- e'gc of dowpiown Ivji7 at ails. tt d;n.
dren, too, the but it's the young ones streets, but things have chap i. em rl- sIail tr.c:
who worry the park workers. There are more economic st. Orenf~money, .«..:n ..rr i r,is ..ISO
quo sirrets aren't as se ib, ,.n,.,
If one were to i•~ hurl or b,. ill, kid fn ne it n _ t t
park official,, ,hf pit ehe r:rrlir ! f.: ,ee ,,re v;~ ❑lec
c
I I. It
1 I. - ahuut u% .t, -
!t sa r,.t
„ ul , I c notitL .i li,a, kly in t , very lt ..,tree- a,on
h a wsc. In M irmeap ,45 "There to r or .ra J ...n1, she wits their pAcols mui , r, a 11 11
the city that doesn't hi,, it a,,.. t it, id.rm so. begin, Nei
Ur' rtunitely we have been an in. some of that occurring," _he:.!r7
formal ,,1,y-sitting service for quite, Still, Jagodzinski and workers at oth• At P IN dr, n n" 1: Jn ,r
sonic to„1 ' said Jean Baumgardt, The parks always have providrd cr parks say they'd rather have the apol s, out I youth services coordinator for St, some unofficial day
care, said bell, a kids there than completely on their as is cl, .r t i ~r
Paul parks and Recreation, She esti- park employee for 21 years. "But as own. "We try to get them involved visc,S kids r t al-
mates that half the city's 44 parks the economy has gotten worse, so has and keep them arming I would rsh- ihouph
each has a half dozen or so unsuper• the problem." Many of the children er have them in the I, ,,k dau g
vised children who,spend much of arc there bec,use their parents can't thing constructive 0.. 1 .node ,ng W i I+. u.
everyday there" afTrrJ to send thr.n to day care ren- around in the st,,_ t,.°
aren't dr enor - to
Child I tection worker, and p park oi '_th,;ti. ay. it r.-ar hot E p c _ ,.nil rc r t , .."':K
,
",i it -er'- who se,°.d u, ,.rents t ,
(r . n rvised to r ,s,
. co itl~.,k ,at m ply , ..i-..In,
r u,
a t I, Utt'u• end, s ..r,, su ,le _d,r i r.,. ,r.-irl ..ilcath-,r ,ai.!ii,l Irc t . _ily ;'i.
~ ui+ g t. 1uu i. 4„situu. money Ilv slow - of r: 105 q u :t tlnar
III `ray r M.1 -r Hennepin who wc,a, ,mho p; - d,a t t - th, n a Icy,"said dr,a„r, r . , t r pa
Cou, ild; oc,i ion pro gram. . , ni 111_~ t(IrI
Often recreation workers try to get A1, i..rr 1";rk in a; ul.o~r ;
Neglect statutes cover such basics as parents to register their youngsters In ..c instances there is sm indica-
failing to provide food and shelter or for sports ar crafts pro ms, and tion that the parents have been a ,.h t t
allowing a child to be in imminent sometimes the workers ju&s[ta ahead home, but they gust don't want to r aU i j,, r f, - J t
danger. Christiansen said his depart. and include kids, j deal with (the children) all-day," he r t tr,.a r ;
' rent has received few calls over the \ said "Rather than pay out the
years from park workers about aban- "I think we provide a t iendous $30, or $40 (a week for child c
doned children, and Ram,y County wrvi,» to those ch I cn - a;d W,i,, thew Ir; them r"3m around ho,.,;.o -
- ofLn.ils said they're not aware ofany ".But it isn't , r h, iii we 13. , ~il tl lv, ,..t t l-Pn,"
hcalls. a rut th r.If -,'t , a
rf,nk it's, nild.I," .J , r t,:
~ i
,
in
)yt rve,six: : .,;ate, alp t ..~f„ t„ the '
-..d vat
..W t,c,t I wan s child ii as t<,:,t%,~tty .-.as the ;uuint"- "If B*$ hot, rn__t tY=c kids are bi
x-°
i ''A
k
j DER T. ,
m.~masd"^r". --a.,,... ~~,.3.. ,nom ~ ..r /S-nom a. 4.f 'i.; mow', `.m.✓_,
r
By James Cox
USA-TODAY
j Another person migh, let a
little thing like a lawsuit +)n ae
h^tween her and L, r c tto,f,!
s a m 4 ~utt Not ShnrFl t ,t t~
i
. JULY 8, 1988
kj7]oe a wee _;cz tdxra_
if e fir huirl
ht;, 10 , s.ai Ito t,luy
oullw1d forth W. 1 rds No
t't.,Cic. that tteteit,n i,~t-u:l by
k;.nr old ad agency, Lord,
I L;elier, Federico, Einstein,
M which is suing her new ar;en-
Lord, Einstein, O'Neill ;k
[vIO ~a ~if~ra utie it lify tern, for breathing
didTt want to rctrty
_.f h'."'w"± tho
mr:.4nr oiw tip ttnie:
Ei~;Ltrc ial•ion ~}'u1~ii° ;ar ;y„~r; f ~ ni2ed ~x;ttb~tli in
t< f U'.t ,it°uty of tl r hO , ,_r~,t girls of -uili owr"
~rra [ i,~ aria t k G ti yu's and L,rUr<< Chu ilfe
i , ;r fe tl ait_m: ~n.S vtutr co v'i" l i-Ln fr'„r❑ Lhc utr.", u;
u ::ni .u5rr', e. Yu, . t, rrrn,-or} ~Ieo~zrni tau Xl-
ace, oitrn o: part of the bill tot ey;, e~{uii'urleut, .
h . ut fet-s fluid the .,11 mtpuiLwit post,~iiie iefr ,1~ni4 L.
Their largesse is not wasted, experts say.
"People who plisy company-sponsor softball fund to
think of work as being more fun," says David Abramis, an
organizational psycholol ist at California State University at
Long Leach na< 1;,,opie who h; ve nfo•e fun in d 'ir w_+rh
are pr npk ,rho I nd to t! mor,- rniniv:at,,A aiui, r 1'c'11ce
Su- -ds, a :;1it evc°~i ~furrn r t ,
bi ~ r 's A . art tai mou. 3 r~~ „~~~i fount ~ uurti~hnit
whit= 21,a? caeun ttie i),..:rit r.'s b. 1rt- or-
dert'd tlmt a u!.urio:r6 k., built ai,d u - tumrl era-
Please see COVER STORY next p ge
~ o
T01"lly
COVER-S
cttnt...:..::_€ irel~it t tt •
ployr.~ :est c:• tOnal~~a.
• But MCIn ,ils;l, pis i, rt;r a Of uoll nu s executives,
their - -v and i,t .tl, .'orfi- sbciut r ,.;111- developing
betw l ; tIne11 5. l l l;)t L j' l Ot'Iies U1 ,t th, 2)'on't de-
velop. "Oh, 1 + ncourage it," he say. "If you have bitterness
everyone, n a while, it's; a small pr , t in pay for enthusiasm."
► Pepsico Inc. just finished building a new field complete
with electronic scoreboard and home-run fence (275 feet in
deep center) at its Some rs, N.Y., headquarters. Tlit! company
hired a New Jersey firm to truck in the same type of clay used
on the Yankee Ihim itu iek in N, - 11„k.
Now Pepsi's I. .,m' r1inl>.r;
~Oc
„ Eh~ tml; nr 1 : _ti ,I ..ills C,, . is•
!rs
In ,,tl,c :.Jni I!s }'p _ cr t;,f In-
11,; ll," Ali-Al hi cuilipaiy i wiA
d, play t, a shl
Tthc. Aver i5ta n 0 ,a11 y arld St t ra, i at cy
actuna front 17 cities and bo,.Es bid ulime sponsors s4. : Wl .
Kraft, Ocean Spray and Beck's Beer. Winning a world tes
championship would be ""the equivalent of gettinga $10 mila:on
account," gushes Jerry I )ell, Fenn,, chairman of Della Fe-
mina McNamee WC1zS r wncy in New York.
In New York's ad 1, 7 1-o lctshcC plays to tor-
f»t about work - at
I ore buslne5,"<, u, ,rt_;lltv;iu the
it irr:-: . r_X lie' , II u ou
A .;..1t;lt'.t,.,
, u1dr: 1.1lc-!ill-;h!.. tluim, and utr Iia! 11,.,,;k..i„r . •,ta~ali} li , hti: ,
it
~t,,tlhi,tl.:.1 toil L161i rl,y, a4'1 ¢ F1Ul.S in
teams to d w Yo;. i, a Tht~ u; , `.:ute uui.'. the
,t membcln only sl;ytdly Ti,ey
avoid disco .:nl; Iatvsllit pat iculars and the IBM ad account
that the two ;L ❑i ies r,e fighting over, says Vanderslice.
In the office or plant, softball draws on lots of comp, Iny re-
urces. For some team l;4 the burly guy from the loadiiig dick
supplies clean-up 1wwt:r,, the photocopier sp out
and the graphic titi-ii ,-tesigns jersey logos. For a'. 1_e tr.uu is `
fis stuff ui uli,, e ch.;ttr; .
In ?'iCn ,d his in . )ft Joa_!l
,c11fc I"!p...lc as 1'. ,it)
. ~trtry lu t, G .`A it u.~,4e - 'ic`S ,)fly;
Olit daa ti,,'
t S ll.tl!li t,i l 6 . , ,oUr
"i L)und," I) ll.l 1111: iaa sa ys.
In Blcn.ntitl;;iun„ Ill., Mort Wacker, 57, loves pitying _rst base
so he can e throws frt im the young hotshots in their 24s who
work for him at State Farm Insurance Co, "I like to go out and
irritate the ki. s,°" he say::;, adding that many haven't been alive
as long as he's been pia:ying for State Farm's team
Roy Glvove, a vice president at Saatchi & Saatchi DFS
Compton, a New York ad age cy, married an opponent "She
was a smart, talented catcher he its. `°I told her after the
ae how much I admi t 1 ft 11
Mary Ann Glynn, wbo it,:, ori;;(t t}1,:vh)r
,l Ic Uolv r„;ly, C,sUbon!.`-: Ills( 1111 Olii' 7fLilsl i al,t Cl,ti
tl,tv~:,pn u,•,nr;i +,4r11a,: ,a!!iii. )~,ystl it".,nii:., .
i; mlc1iV;t•tiSil
u, ts<~ ;tt ,uutt~ p: ~ .t ~ :~ler ix•hind. I'wC yr.a15 ,,•~),,z ptyr.
u[ hz:IVer s, a ulna a, benched his pul ~ to : ,;:ding
r atl ~fA, i it::,m practices, ; (low employee suspoi: t that the
pub6lter was suit stewing that fall when he approved a budget
that eliminated the columnist's position and salary.
Most of the time, though, "you can say things around the
softball bench that you can't say in the boardroom or in some-
body's ofi,o," says Paull Tuchm,ut, a t i,xk.;t r> s=~arf:her for
General Mills Inc. in Mi nneapuit,.
Tucl,uraf 's trE:n1 is a U,i.xi rt.irr?lice of to v ISAu ^0 t inftn
office c-,ll let ',)If c-,)ltl =ill li.. ,uitb.1. ,S i,lr,lGn<f,
whet'I 't
ers and OM 1a4:1 10, ill
the s-.~..~ rk>:att .',,uarEtt~-)ll , h. ~Ori+ tht-T a[tvt~
sales _ ir1 ~ dtlr<ali, lh l~, e1;1t;r 1,1W t,air -
games.... ,;-rl f,t v; h!Ct, _ it uibc!*.
The Loons, ~xt; i [in br&lli, E,r,':
talk a bettei allu_, ;l ii; u y l f
marketing. Lvo;,s 1U.. ager AI , t,p .,r.t;, iiiia TUCK-
man's team - the Pfad :'attitudes - ;ii, cs u, a keg of beer
from last year. I may live to go t
The Loons led the lh-id A[titud, us to nnc before
their tiltal shcv„ln,,. or'. are nt ; ut- ,ilt-l,lw (I, it
I uchm.lii c,di;,a il'bor h!si c tl, I' 11 nho-i",
1ur:!,I,,.11 thy. Qn tl f;ar.it: 1-1 !n the
-i t? lit..-^.LllfLLit. -J7Ci_lupivInice - ,
3 1 Ow f il. pu ! , ,;iii, tJ i., • .
Ant iua n,n'~„ r `n: All lu l;""tl!t-; L,
one of t!. nni i'ru wh(,,re
the t .s war(: it, a ,>tt! call' , htser to
live with this Ili 1Z mu:!sar
w Surnmor mintzature wolf. 10
CITY OF G
SUBJECT.- CONDITIONAL USE P.
APPLICANT: YOCUM OIL COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT , BLOCK 1, THOMAS LAKE CENTER D.
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CTRL WITHIN
BLACKHAWK PARK P.D.
DATE O PUBLIC HEARING: L , 1988
DATE O PORT: L 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEP TIMENT„
APPLICATION SUMMARY
application has been submitted requesting a.r. n ".«tional us3
Permit to allow an automobile service station/car wasla faciliLy
with a pylon sign located at the northeast intersection of Cliff
Road and Thomas Lake Drive in the Thomas Lake Shopping Center
complex. In June 1986, the Council approved three pylon signs
for the shopping center with the understanding that there e no
further pylons without Council approval. This props
requesting free standing pylon sign at the : ~ in-tv
as well as signage on the gas pump car,.o'ny. l01in,
square feet of signage area with an un--7e ignatae" ? e ic'4h . T'he
maximum allowed by code is 27' with 125 square feet (A signag,,~
area. Also, the 30" tall lettering on the canopy must be reduced
to 20% o the facade area to meet code requirements.
Currently, there are curb cuts onto Thomas Center Drive and the
shopping center entrance. Both Planning and ngineerJ'na
Departments recommend keeping the existing curbing i:tact ~ tlce
northeast portion of the lot. This will allow fo-r re mat rk-i_nc
stalls and/or landscaped green areas. Code requ. 2 pay inq
stalls for this facility and 30 nine foot wide one have beer.k
provided, including the 12 at the six gas pump locations. The
stalls should be increased to 1' width.
The building will be constructed with brick and it will have a
grey sign band area. No rooftop mechanical equipment is shown on
the elevations. condition o the approval for t4- sl-,,o p-I nc
center required that the landscaping be install-, lor' `
perimeter of the whole complex. Additional plant a-1 s1-louicl
be placed along the eastern property line. phis can bb-.
accomplished with the building permit application since all of
the perimeter landscaping was already approved.
e
'
ENGINEERING COMMENTS '
Rough site grading was completed with the previous platting of
the Thomas Lake Center Development. The site plan proposes
conveying storm water runoff from the parking lot and pump aisle
area northerly in a bituminous swale between the gas pump islands
and the convenience store. The development is required to revise
the grading/drainage plan to eliminate directing storm water
runoff in the bituminous swales along the easterly and westerly
sides of the pump islands. Staff advises modifying the proposed
grading/drainage plan creating a high point running east to west
and directing storm water runoff northerly and southerly to the
curb lines and intercept this storm water runoff into an internal
storm sewer system. Parking lot grades are required to be at
least a 1% minimum.
With a proposed entrance from the easterly adjacent parking lot,
the entrance at the northeast corner to the proposed convenience
store car wash onto the shopping center entrance road will not be
allowed. The proposed westerly entrance from Thomas Center Drive
will be required to be a concrete apron from the curb line to the
end radius of the curb return zone from Thomas Center Drive. The
development will be required to construct a similar concrete
apron at the northerly entrance from the shopping center entrance
road.
The Development is proposing ' wide parking stalls where City
standards require a minimum of 10' in width.
ASSESSMENTS: search of City records show the following pending
assessments of record:
PROJ DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY OT
510 Storm Sewer Lateral .15/sf 10,720 $1,608
City special assessment policies in effect at this time show no
additional assessment obligations are due.
& CONDITIONS: OCUM OIL
1. The trash enclosure shall be constructed of the same
materials as the building.
. The canopy signage shall be limited to 20' of the £`<?Z<ony
facade area.
3. Only one access shall be a1 s y l Ctg c,
drive in.
4. All permanent parking stalls shall be 10' wide.
. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visa le from th--,
public streets.
. No outside loudspeaker advertising or outside displays shall
be permitted.
7. Additional landscaping along the eastern property line shall
be required and approved prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
. If any existing curbing is removed along the eastern pi,
line, cross easement will be required.
. The Development is required to revise the proposed site plan
to incorporate the following concerns:
a. Revise parking lot grades to a minimum 1%.
. Revise drainage plan to eliminate 1 -7-used
bituminous swales along the easterly and i '_.:rly
sides of the pump islands.
C. Revise entrance drive widths into site to a 30'
width.
d. Construct concrete entrance aprons.
1D3Ww R4WbOl 4att ~ s:W ~r ~
ON!'St,w 11H~k3IV IMA 3UVf1-bM/N0SIUa0W L'00 uo wasotCNV
ASS SN31N3AN0~ tid
-
&fit
® TS 3A1 SIMOHt t
U
e ® yM ~ ~ i t rYY
ayR, i 4 + I+M1 ~ ; yyY t - / R ttt R a (y.~^,. ; - -ry .
d =I ~.d 1;~+ t
_ CT a } a~f w
t
kQS ;~4 ; i l F t
L P I~ 6 1 E 1 i .
't ♦ RR i ~ °ea, l .Li 1 ~ ~ 1 f..t JJ f~.+R r i 1 ~ . ,
{~.j y 1t } t e ~4 a ae 1
zj C 5' g 1I r 1 't r
f IF 1 7
a~,...aw T ~-r ~i ~5"d~E nF YET"a i ~
All
~i:
Broom,
1 e
ay.. m s. a 9 e. +
,a. "~a Q• Oae q i 3 i ax
14 L
R t
t t= V rte` I ~ o ri * _
«s
.+a dAf{-0fA (ftA9 sttl ~ $1&AA%INIM.j~J{YOY3 4 ,
w,q OFtH YdOtYMn 3NVl NS'i®33MM e Y31Yi': yiYXYiYi0LL1~
vtW d1dWdY NdYfWf AA6{ 11,91 3Nt'S 03:I HOab 1AabrllbM/NOStaaOW ;'h„„ » • , °og:7ia.Ntn3oataNl. a03 HsgMt3ti9 arty
H 3uois C6 c3sodosd
.z
r~+ TMw
e
a
t'' r !
" 4'r
• '~N~®'b32N33'SdWOli.O
_ J{
ONI `S1O31IH:)HV IAHvri-iVtA/NOSIULIOW °a~'za6 Ntn aA 3at1 =tia y,,..
1
le
r.
a.
is
.s g
Primary Identification Factwy Appearance Standards 12
d .
1
A
TEXACO
Y Service
Center
1.001
. 6A - Regular
10
q (y
Unleaded 1
A0 %k 01' - -
Now Offering Now Offering
Super Unleaded Super Unleaded
ao
d 0
Lot&
Locate sign as promi- Do Not
nently and as close to locate sign so that it
main traffic flow as blocks view of canopy
possible. identifier.
Position (height) of
Changeable Price/
Message Module to
be 8' minimum; 10'
recommended; or to
meet local zoning
laws.
Family of Signs The Do Nots on these
pages apply to all
Primary Identification
signs.
Service Area Appearance 22
't
r
3 t 6..
Top edge of r'ag signs
ila_ns with bcttom
F , E : ` of S_" Bar.
i u n
4
r g'
Numerals are keyed
I on following pages.
COLOR SAil,-,:
b
_ l
ccurate signing of a new site is as much a part of its total look as is archi-
tecture or color. Exact color matching, typographic alignment, ar, ;n
placement should comply with the standards set forth in this manual.
Following these guidelines will result in a clean, professional appearance
that has always been an integral part of Texaco's public image. Great care should
be taken to achieve the visual effects demonstrated on these pages with each
new site application.
P
i °
tj of ~a~,OprB~'f p i
I y W
1 ""'\111 m'~. r ,
s C1
s
1 b X i .r ~
V "
P
~F At
i
PROPOSES CONVENENi' STORE 4 =.te„ ewe u
AND CARWASN FOR: THE'YOCUM OIL.CO. rk.+r~Mwh w MORRtSON/WALIJARVI ARCHITE{ 7Sr lNG.
i a wir ens+~ww aRe4~.c w..4 - ~aa<t r,
W taw N t4 StsU k Hwuts. ` I %t®® iaW4N STHEC4
THp YAi CAKC CLN4P:N _ _ IOW+s + ~M ILNCC NW:ESOYA $6410 a
CAQAM s H -Te
Mp. ws a
f
CITY O G
SUBJECT.- COM ?R. NS V : ODE LAN ~_IE N MEN
REZtahr._
PRELIL.IKARY PL _®2
( I CLIFF ADDITION)
APPLICANT: CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP
LOCATION: 1f O SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: A (AG LTURkL)
DATE OF PUBLIC REARING: JULY 26, 1988
A O PORT: JULY 18, 198
REPORTED B PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION J _-:.Y
Earlier this yEar, a plan was submitted to the City requesting a
Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to a planned development district
for the alaxie Cliff Plaza Addition. After the initial concept
review by the Advisory Planning Commission and neighbor'. i
meetings, revised submission taking into account
neighborhood's concerns has been prepared for formal APC act-,.--.
The site area (25.36 acres) configuration ant c c .r tat cn
system remain the same, however, the applicant will purl-L,7is the
triangular Astleford roadside business-zoned parcel if the
planned development zoning is approved. That parcel would then
be platted along with this overall plan.
The total development (including the Astleford parcel) c .---;ns
161,439 gross square footage. Building sizes could be
increased from this amount without approval by the City Cc-,unc il.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet ( AW) will not be necessary
since the total proposed building area is below the 300,000 sq.
ft. threshold. Approximately 850 parking stalls are required by
code and they have been provided.
The proposed uses are;
8,000 s. . supportive retail use
3,500 s. t. restaurant
7,000 sq. ft. family-style, no liquor, sit--down, rep ~Zlurant
25,000 sq. ft. office building
43,639 s. ft. health club
20,000 sq. ft. office building
20,000 s. ft. office building
37,800 s. ft. office building
GALAXIE CLIFF ADDITION
None of the buildings will be above two stories, or approximately
0'-0' including rooflines. This plan places the higher
intensity uses along the 3 off-ramp and along Cliff Road. Two
office buildings are shown along the Galaxie Cliff curve where
the original plan called for three buildings and day-care
facility. Also, in this area a 0' buffer strip has been added
where no building or parking will occur. The intent i to retain
as much of the existing plant material i this area as possible
and to add more, especially in the southern area where the site
is open grassland. The applicant has submitted a conceptual
landscape plan that addresses these previously-stated concerns of
the neighborhood. The landscape architect will also help design
the detailed building and parking lot layout in an effort to be
as sensitive to the site as possible, as well as to the adjacent
single-family homes.
The proposed uses fall within the limited business zoning
category except for the 3,000 sq. ft. retail and fast-food
facility. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary
for those uses even though they are only 7% o the projected
total development.
All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements and the
lot coverage is 7% limited business zoning allows 20%. The
total impervious coverage is 6% 5 of the site will be green
space.
The two-story office building on lot 1, block 1 acres)
contains 25,000 s. ft. and will be constructed of precast
decorative panels and large window areas. Detailed site plans
will be reviewed/approved staff prior to the issuance of
building permit. All street access drives must have 30'-wide
minimum width. The trash enclosure should be incorporated into
the building.
E_
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading ,
submitted for reviewat this time proposes site grading of the
entire site except for the area around existing Pond -14, a
smaller pond located northeasterly of the existing pond and
opposite of Karis Way, and the area immediately a('-acent to
Galaxie Avenue between Karis Way and Westwind Trail. grading
plan proposes cut and fill areas ranging from 23' bra
respectively. There appears to be some nonconformity
proposed grading plan and the proposed concept plat t
The preliminary grading and drainage plan shows gradini -i l stcr
sewer line construction in areas which the concept plan shows
preserving of the existing vegetation.
The proposed conceptual drainage plan does not adequately add
site drainage needs. The drainage plan fo the p -4
development is required to provide that allr
conveyed to Pond AP-14. Pond AP-14 has been at
ponding area in the City of Eagan Comprehensive
Pond AP-14's outlet was constructed under the G_.l _cie Avenva
project. There appears to be a ponding area proposed adjacent to
the I-5E right-of-way in the area of proposed Lot 1, Block 1.
No preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was
<<a~3Tcs:i t~
for staff review and approval.
UTILITIES: Adequately siz-d m-itary sewer and
serve the proposed develop ~t are readily avai.-. I iron'l tt)+>
existing facilities in Galaxie Avenue. An " F -;i.tary e=b:m
service stub has been provided to the north property line of
Galaxie Avenue near its intersection with Westwind Trail. The
existing 8" sanitary sewer service stub provided is adequately
sized to serve the entire development. The preliminary --tility
plan shows that the entire site will be served by a t ry
sewer lateral connecting to the existing 8" sanitar
service stub.
An " water main connection is provided to the property line
along Galaxie-Avenue at two locations to allow the water main to
be looped through the proposed site without disturbing cIie
surfacing of Galaxie Avenue. The preliminary utility plan shol'J,I
be revised to show that the existing 8" water maim stub Sze.-ar
Westwind Trail be utilized versus the proposed wet p:4n,-;
existing 24" water main along Galaxie Avenue. P
connection to the water main in Galaxie Avenue wo:-d can
and patch in a recently constructed street. Water pressu in
this development for all but the highest sites will be g: titer
than 80 psi. Pressure reducing valves will be required for the
water systems in those buildings having a floor elevation lower
than 865.
Sanitary sewer and water main services are needed to b{
off of proposed Circulation Drive utilities to P vid3 for
future connections for future phases of this development or
the abutting Astleford property (Parcel #011-27) to ~L',n w-!st.
y
t.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to
serve this site with public street access through the use of
proposed Circulation Drive. Circulation Drive is proposed to
connect to existing Galaxie Avenue in two locations. The
northerly location for the Galaxie Avenue location is
approximately 420'+/- south of the centerline of Cliff Road. The
southerly connection of Circulation Drive to Galaxie Avenue is
proposed opposite of estwind Trail. The two proposed
Circulation Drive connections to Galaxie Avenue are proposed in
acceptable locations.
At the time of the platting of Fire Station 5, the issue of
providing an access point common to the Fire Station and the
proposed Galaxie/Cliff Plaza onto Galaxie Avenue in one location
was identified. At the time of platting of Fire Station #5, the
Council expressed concern about the safety of the existing old
Galaxie Avenue entrance onto new Galaxie Avenue. Council was
advised by staff at that time that when the land to the north
(proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza) developed, the feasibility of a
new major access to the Fire Station would be examined at that
time. If a new access to the Fire Station could be provided
through the use of Circulation Drive, then the old access
location would just serve as a minor secondary driveway access to
the Fire Station. Access to the westerly adjacent Astleford
property (Parcel #011-27) is required from Circulation Drive.
The Astleford property will not be allowed to have public street -
access through the use of the old Galaxie Avenue.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements in accordance with
City of Eagan standards will be required for all storm sewer,
sanitary sewer and water mains. It is proposed that Circulation
Drive be provided with a 70' wide right-of-way because of its
collector street status.
The Dakota County Plat Commiession has reviewed the preliminary
plat for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza. The County will not be
requiring any additional right-of-way for Cliff Road but will be
requiring the dedication of restricted access along the entire
frontage of Cliff Road.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: 'City records show no pending assessments of record
and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of
final plat approval in accordance with Special Assessment
Policies in effect at this time:
PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
Water Availability Charge $2,015/ac 2.91 $5,864
316 Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade .027/sf 125,900 3,399
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $9,263
All final assessment obligations will be calculated b s n the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in °cordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval..
a
GALAXIE CLIFF CONDITIONS.-
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action o September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, 1, B2, B3, 4, Cl, C2, C, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five-year period prior to Final Plat approval.
. The proposed office building on lot 1, block 1 shall be
approved with detailed plans being reviewed by staff. All
other buildings shall be reviewed by both the Advisory
Planning Commission and the City Council.
4. No exterior trash enclosures shall be permitted except for
the restaurants.
5. All buildings will conform to the code ordinance amendments
approved by the City Council on July 5, 1988,
. Shared parking will be used wherever possible to encourage
less disturbance to the land.
7. A 50`, nonbuildable (building or parking) buffer strip shall
be placed along the Galaxie Avenue property line and along
the south side of the Astleford piece if it is required.
B. The building square footages shown shall not be increased.
9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the
public street or 5.
10. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot.
11. All site drainage is required to be conveyed to Pond AP-
14.
12. The development is required to utilize the existing
water service stub provided to the site,
13. The development is required to provide street access,
water service, and sanitary sewer service to Parcel
#011-27.
1. The proposed internal street and all associated public
utility construction is required with the initial develop-
ment.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT A 2 C) AL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of_ ay
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage an,1 l't-'.it
djac:a
easements centered over all common lot lines and
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or fA.nancially
guarantee its proportionate share of `_e
costs of additional drainage, pond'utilii:y
easements as required by the align tr
storage capacity of all required pub'.ic uti14I.ies a.-d
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
. This development shall dedicate all public Y t c v<,,r
and temporary slope easements for ultimate ~ re 1 ,)~t~~ .1- of
adjacent roadways as required by tale e
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drain c;v and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high ~vat.~r
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage vo'.uwv,.i
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion,
control plan must be prepared in accor-3a-
City standards and approved by staff pr__- o a;1 3. i. Lri
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
. detailed landscape plan shall be submi t - an the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff Uhf.,'
final plat approval. The financial guarL__ _ b (-a
included in the Deve' o - ,-,e,-,,t Contract and n t -e leasee.l
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS APPROVAL
OF PLAT PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: yAugust 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
L,TS#2
STANDARD
y
TRI-LAND COMPANIES Towne Centre°ir> z) 3s4t:
1260 Yank, Road
Eagan. 14N 55121
612-452-7850
July 18, 1988
Mr. Dale Runkle
City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, 55122
Re; alaxie Cliff Plaza Neighborhood Meeting
Dear Dale;
Mary Winchester contacted me this morning to cancel the neighborhood
meeting which was scheduled for Wednesday, July 20. She stated that
due to vacation schedules and other conflicts she was having a
difficult time getting enough neighbors to respond to make the meeting
worthwhile.
Mrs. Winchester stated that s --auld simply pick up al. %PC
from the City which would :Dn'L-a the reductions of our p1uns -
any other pertinent data regarding this site. I did inf-;-1n1 Mr:>.
Winchester that should any of the neighbors wish to stop by the
Tri-Land offices to view the plans, they certainly were welcome.
Therefore, as Mrs. Winchester feels that copies of the reductions .All
serve her needs, no neighborhood meeting has been scheduled ara the
neighbors will simply be present at the C meeting.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
g le yours,
. Swenson
sks
cc; William Soules
r ,
y~
~ y PARX Jj 9
~ k P1 v{e,~ i~tr; alfj~}~~ ~ S
lilt;
6..? sa r i
'Av 01,
F >v
a'C54r t c `F
i
5 CAKpTA
7~ Ccu M R 8
t pt. ar ^r , . % i-
gp A: nn ~f,.r. ,
r
T
ur /f q"iP7
D AIL 1
[Ably, °
R B
B✓
~a4`~s rX \ f 3 ' '
Sofa 1.. ~r e $
aAl'
Ulm
A7
_ 7 J P 1. M-
i
owl'
P
t Fig \ \ PeRKt RIDGE gyp,..., p....«.....
P
< B i ~ ~ rte.
Dome, two® PRELIMINARY PLAT [-ZALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
? r°LL
m ~ w
r'
~v~
1
11i :
~ s'r%ri \ cf'~~~ 1 i i u ~ ""i t lri ~ t ~ ~ l 'r''✓d _
/ ~f%! r f ) t f
<
f r ~
I It/
0
_ s -
'
~ , 1 r
`J;/{,f'` BARK R~bGE
` , TM-t,4D AIMTW C4,MC ~~'v
rer. s n PRE~ttdtINARY UTILITY, 1`, G1aLAY'E i E lr FA ZA
- FGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ,
I f
I
t CLIFF ROAD
NEIGHBORHOOD,
BUSINESS
I I
2.8 ACRES
LIMITED BUSINESS
72.3 ACRES
KARIS 1\ Ay
/e'~ LIMITED BUSINESS f
90.4 ACRES !v
r
EXISTING
PA K GALAXIE RESIDENTIAL
\Y`° ~1 M
09
ACRES ~ ~77 -T
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
POP POONA
L. TRILANG GALAXIE CUFF PLAZA
SURYEYtNG
CONCEPTUAL ZONING PLAN
SERVICES EAGAN, MINNESOTA
F
1
ES RANT 1
n(
n I`
OFFK { f
\ ! jet
- '~eV$1 "c RETENTION
_.BASIN C
OFFICE
1~ .g r
~._c
I'v JKj f
r T i ~ WFIFlCE
. x..: 'PARK 7 ' P ri r'+
r _
4
Too v
1 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN I
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
i rl
tE~
9G~6- 125
_ ~ r Jam' _c~'~~ a►'r► ~ f
tie
fG3DQ <7
64
~J
~ ~ Q7JFP£tz°
~5l _l~G~dt.~" ; _ _ r x~ Arm _ • Rya rY~
do EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
f
Z~l
-
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA CONCEPT PLAN,
~ A ; EAGAN,, MINNESOTA
r
tru+,r tsar
/ / em bLrw- ; t
e Aff t ~ r
m i
4~Y d a~
1. ,e~ ~ h"v4►.1'A#J ~ J "~°r
`ICJ jJ(~jj{t (~j{j7 Q/J/f(j f
41
tr
t;ul
~r
77-
.ot f . • r
ems, i °
'
\ FD otT EXISTING SING L','-'- a. ,'A LY DET
t
I
.K GAIAXtE CLIFF PLAZA
SITE Y
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
c
f
I
I
f
r fff
,RETAIL/
SERVICE
l ,
RE A RANT 'i tl
ONO'
TAUR T
\ ro
A
OFFICE
HEALTH CLUB / p ENTI r✓ i~Af-IS 1„~A7"
QFflCE
BASIN
~ /U I RETENTION !
OFFICE
f mss' \ OFFICEI
SO' BUFFER ZONE
'PAR
/ f A
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
EACAN. MINNESOTA
35 E
PONU _
_
- ~Ltt PiNCi NOTES'
OFFICE BUiLDiNQ A n. M,n xe:
4 .vo4Y4 •e4}44}0
4~aar •o}- Inc u~rr
u.ooo4.r. ~
-IT"LL
° caws u+ ~a uw wx
- 9}tl Cn44
E
CIRCULATION DRIVE as < ` n" 9
• d
SITE PLAN a TYPICAL PYLOIrr
I
;lr r:~v - OT
I
r ~
f I
i
'SECOND FLOOR PLAN }>+r< e°•®• I FIRST FLOOR PLAN} err}•, r•4
[BASEMENT , BELOW 5,000 S.F,
Msw, w4..e -ww
dlS' GN-L,: f
~ I
SOUTH ELEVATION
RssDC ales 1 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZAiGiwPT PLAN A2
EAOAN, F MINNESOTA
+ ( CLIFF ROAD,' NorE
r6
ofrlc~ - ~ `t f
¢;°,EC' :tfs.f ff. FOND {
LOT i
r
a
UT T i
~Z'*,■° a® 0 LOT
POND: 1
PONDI
■ F
GAP ~ 1
f~1G AYfee■t ~'~I'~6 /f
}
1
[GALAXI-E- -AV
ENUE~
1 ~L x 1
vanney
Rssocisces ALAIE CLIFF PLAZA (
~AOaN, ~ a+INNESarA .CONCEPT PLAN A-1
ATE AVAILABILITY CHARGE - 2.91 ACRES
I
-.gym. • ~ ®v.
/ ` G f.'/!f 1 I ! !~"1 v t t • 1 1 f ~r/'r"~-~w~ ~.V A.,,;,,'~.. n. r. r,a v ~ i ~ L' ~ '~7~^ ~
♦ i\i ,iii,
111 y
R.l
'44 f
f i e dd
Jul /ttffi~^♦ a `et , B m e+ at
r
PLgK RIDGE 4
_ e
t
t x..a.io~,.v~,.nm.+c
PREUMINARY PLAT GAO
ALAA
A
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADLE - 125,900 S.F.
a•'
X1,
s
22
~/%~-r~ ✓ l ~1j4~ °ct, J j~Y,rrrNrr•~xr. ~~••."~,.rt,•,",~••° ri ` n} ~ Q
5,..,
> i ''psi/ i 1 i ~ a\\`. ° > ,r' ~ ~ . i.
X"\
r/r, iiL~// l* 0ya. 1 ! ;I I° [ l 0 ~i, 1 ) /Il~~\~t~ ' S pi 1, /1 0 4
r / rr r G/
t, PRELIMINARY T GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
145 46.3173..
,
MAR I
10 R, {i
A, D F ti~ r It 1 TC
16u1
~'~~e flee
V
3 7. 7
` L I -j 1j C EN FE ft
(2.5f56.0 228 87.
231 30.8/55: i- i (227
(
{~'i~ GECLIF E
' "mac ,r i to }t.1 ; 1000 l~ rf ; ^I T I^'t
y iooo
233 7~8 ~::p
i Qe 1 ` ~p jilE~ / 1 - t
mob home omm
1 11j C 18
"Z/ a
eZO
t! :j DAKOTA COUNTY PARK
1. e
p. )
GROUND STORAGE 4 r ur {
fj s to `s
H. w.L. 1150
24w l
L
226
k`-
J 25.8/33.0
PARCEL
FIG #3
c 1 trN standard
WATER app. data
PUBLIC
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
DDEPARTMENT1
, _
- H1'•,( j AP-9 9000
AP°40
=s it 881.7 4
889.0 i i APB t I 912.1
T i t r 2 918 G
889.2
9.2,
U
P- 894.7 i .C,
l
SAP-50 X88.5 `S'AP 4'2
' ~A-ss S4 I_ l 886.a I 895.0~t.
~
--r904.0-_.
A-ir
A dd
AP-1 / A-;,
;
908 2 q3 8P 32'.-
914.0 f2ti1 .933.9
I-_ R~ti~ c AP-44 f_r9~ 9376
I r Jr 915.9 A-fP
1 ~ ~ j .,I N -918.0 A-ee
AP' -24 ' 12 C
AP-19 916.0 {
3388 c 92Q4 ' \ ri AP-1 AP 4$
924.0 o rim ~92a.6
92&.C3 , AP-I5 9235
24" -9a8
A4 J 17LL
AP
-92 91.5~0
l
2 0 .
! T `
926:2
TE
{11 925,5 y .
AP-34
p ~
tic3!,f;934a AP-17
926.0
93 .8 q
®AxOTA coo,";TY i
A-YY
AP-33 ! F\
99aa.a 1 tsrns-
'I 985.3 1 - r
A-zz
i
SUBJECT PARCEL
I
city of eagan STORM SEWER approved. ptan and
LIBLIC
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
® DEPART
n
CI O G
SUBJECT: WA1`VER OF PL~All'
APPLICANT: VINCENT D -1, -DY
LOCATION: T 5, E E C `,S; I -E 4 OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: - (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE O PUBLIC ' %RING: JULY 26,
DATE C'' PORTS JULY 18, 1938
REPORTED BY: PLANNING A147D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
application has been submitted requp;.t;ng e Plat for
the conveyance of a land sale locate a i.
Oak Road just west of Pilot Knob Road. On NovE- 2 1984, a
Preliminary Plat for the Oakwood Addition, consisting of fourue i
single-family lots on 7.5 acres, was approved by the Lity
Council. The Final Plat was never completed; therefore, a naer
Preliminary Plat will be required before any further subdivision
occurs. The Waiver of Plat accurately reflects the air-jn K-,)f tlnElx
previously approved plat. 0' ease- along t'i, t side of
lot 5 will provide access to the port: portio.. 3 1~ 10 t.
One single-family structure will be all( ~d on that ai_ w If- nci
when the platting procedure begins again, it wulltr=:
dedicated street right-of-way.
Currently, there are homes on lots and and (two) on lot to
the west. Parcel o the north will contain 87,800 s.t. and
the existing homesite (parcel B) will contain 34,000 s. ft. It
meets all code setback requirements.
If approved," this Waiver of Plat pane?.1 be to all
applicable ordinances.
ENGINEERING CO N S% The existing residence on proposed Parcel
B presently is served by City sewer and water. The Development
will be required to provide a 30' wide easement along the
easterly side of proposed Parcel is 30' wide roadway
easement will provide public access to Parcel and would serve
as a portion of the required street right-of-way for future
Development.
Assessments proposed as a condition o the Waiver are identified
as follows:
PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY OT
Future Trunk Storm Sewer .056 121,990sf $6,831
Future Lone Oak Road 48.05/ff 200 ff $9,610
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $16,441
Lot 5, Zender Acres will be subject t additional sanitary sewer
and water trunk assessments when the area is final
platted and developed into lots.
e
4 CONDITIONS: KENNEDY WAIVER
1) 30' driveway easement along the east side of lot 5 shall
` provide access to the newly created parcel.
) Development is required to accept its additional
obligations as defined in the staff's report i^ l 'Ice
with the dimension as shown on the Waiver of Fla_ a&&u the
rates in effect at the time of the Waiver.
3) The Development is required to fulfill its °tary
obligations to the City for costs associated with Pro3ect
#445.
EN9 7 r`
INTERSTATE AyA
L05r 5HIR /
_ eouxrxr
P
P GQ'
I
` 222
~k x t Q
r
PF- F b
PF
x
GC I-F
/ Su80; EHNDEf+ is R t i
F;CWZZ5
W
® W
avow SONA 1011d cc
CL
U
6 ~
❑ ' .
5
a 1 a ' o
• J a 1 a ~ a, f-
w,
i o °.x
% r
~ VII
' s 25 ME
25 0
} ~"r Y ~ } G 1 t ~ fit' • Yt
ri
e
RUNK STORM S -121,990 S.F. mammon C UAK R}P t 200 F., i
I
w48'dt nm't
t
4 50 too
-ALE M FEET
°^A
~:::~:_::::°a;-.~;.;~::.:::.:. °:::;:a:®::~:e LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL 'A`
- Tla wa at lOT t. iEaY%N KNEE. AMde CaaneY. f~+aq> hbg mav& e9 km swH f8f W ea.1 Mr«i.
PARCEL @'
n BM sru @Jf.M @wk s6 t6T f, dEtDEN Kai. 6~wa Ga.aaY, Wvuwa
e®°~er0®i s`ss~esee®080®+®e'^~~^-
u° 4 g®
a
:C•
Y
. LONE OAK
A y®a. asa,`y,
CO.I.M.6 tNa@NEtif PREPARED FOR:
;i: OdEG(NEQ niNNtis «e si.ea suiwronf
s zL V{ ...,~.@.
~:v--
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NC IN
PE 4 ~ ( •-so IN
Es.
'
E
r ,
t
a F .r
•
i
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
I ra r. 1 e r-------;».-.-'-------I r C------r.,
-Tj
ref 1 FA 1 1 IYZ \o ® N i ;?rYl
lot. 1
t
An
1«7 w' / \ \ R \ RwaJ' i
• I... } a rrw"a z 1 r.;' ".rk®- fI♦ ~1a .s i t ,y.
I+ tS t w, a ® \ Sri ® ®
4 r ( ~w
1 c s t r/ \ a.
s N C 1..,. <roa M~~® ~w r•,; ""i"wre ® ° fr+°~ ~ `'a, u" i t , .
e 6 to wZ
s a rr' h; a EIIEEH DRIVE
M
r 1 erw t s~~ ~m4 iR 6i~ J ®p
10 all,
IS tj „1 ti I I I t ♦ t I yty S:I B \ a 4N t
o t i~ 91
" li ra .1,t o:=. I t+t. , M! t q a \ Crs. w`
I j 1{ p I t a I is a rFTI.
Km;-,B RzA
f ~Cx I
ozzs
~
C •
m s
m -
:60" f ca;,,; MY 8.
1 p 4.
41 -i:
- y -t.. ; ~..i.s
- r.
-4, 1
P
-7 /b
R
C '
D-o P1~'E ? z v
SL, ZEN';Ccx~ 8
as
TA q 24 1
D-'d .
t l.-+ - `CHC0L
2"
.i J. _t T 17
P -2
AR 9
- - ^ ~ , +i. ♦ ! ~ i tom`
III r
e a •a a.
FIG 1
plate f:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT1 MASTER PLAN
CITY G
SUBJECT: LIZ C tY PLAT `2 (WOODLANDS 2N[)
D. "
APPLICANT: OB WI E GS D C
LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: -1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
ATE F PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26 , 1988
T OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED Y: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been ubmitted rE a g a 1s--
for The Woodlands 2nd ' -d'~-ion consiv':.'ng of 1; le family
lots on 7.35 acres previously zoned -1 with 4Yuudlanalls
Addition. This plat is in conformance with the City's nos t
recent Land Use Plan that designates this area D-1 0-3 units per
acre. The variance i for the cul-de-sac i excess of 500 feet
(630 proposed).
There is virtually no other way to develop this parcel and al.,. of
the lots are above 0 feet wide at the setback line, most .n
the 110-120 feet range. They vary in size from 12,700 ~q. f::. to
5,945 s q. t. The developer intends to sell t17-- its for
custom home sites and will have architectural con°-o_ or each
building as was the case with The Woodlands 1st Addition. The
cul-de-sac follows ridge line that falls to low areas on ~ L_l
sides. Except for the southeastern three lots, the r"_.
heavily wooded and well suited for exec-?tive om _..>m
Although an overall grading plan was submit'ed, 11: the
developer's desire to grade each lot in ivi lly to as
many trees as possible. Since the William 4 _11C
Easement forms the western property line, it has t.a. a cu; o A ry
procedure to note that easement i all abutting lots' purcliaze
agreements.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed cul-de-sac
(Tanglewood Court) was previously graded with the Woodlands
development. The grading proposed as a part of the Woodlands 2nd
Addition is required to create building pads for the proposed lot
development. The proposed fill slopes meet the City's :1 slope
criteria.
Storm sewer of sufficient depth and capcity to serve this site is
readily available in Basswood Lane. The development will be
required to provide an emergency overland drainage swale between
Lots 9 and 10 from the proposed low point in Tanglewood Court.
The existing low areas in the backyards of the proposed lots are
designed to receive only backyard runoff, no storm sewer will
discharge into these low areas.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff
review as a part of the preliminary plat application. erosion
and sediment control plan addressing the following general
criteria is required before issuance of a grading permit or final
plat approval: Slope stabilization, restoration specifications
after rough grading and utility installation, silt fence
placement and maintenance, lot benching, gravel construction
entrances, and diversion of runoff away from cut and fill slope
areas.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and
depth has been provided to the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition
from the existing sanitary sewer in Basswood Lane.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure has been
provided to the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition from the existing
water main in Basswood Lane.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Improved public street access has
been provided through-Basswood Lane as a part of the Sunrise
Hills Addition development. The development is proposing to
serve the proposed lots through the use of a cul-de-sac street.
At the time of the platting of the Woodlands Addition, the
proposed cul-de-sac street was designed as a through street to
connect to the northwesterly adjacent property.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: 4 The development is proposing
street right-of-way widths in accordance with City Codes.
Sufficient right-of-way for Basswood Lane was provided with the
platting o the Sunrise Hills Addition.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies.
ASSESSMENTS: The following pending assessments are identified
based on the rates in effect under Project 494 and the
developable area in the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition:
FROJ DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMI"
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 258,514 $1;x,701
494 Water Trunk 1,250/ac 5.94 a 7,425
TOT PENDING ASSESSMENT $21,126
The following assessments are attributed to the proposed Outlot A
in the Suncrest Addition. The underlying parent parcel of the
proposed Suncrest Addition had not been pr+ v iously asce-s ec1 for
water trunk or storm sewer trunk area ass r s.
PROD DESCRIPTION QTY T
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 27,240 $1,525
494 Water Trunk 1,15/ac .25/ac 822
TOT PROPOSED A SSEtS!OENT $ 2,347
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
R
t
THE WOODLANDS 2 ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions o plat approval adopted
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl, 1, Fl, and Gl.
. Lots 7, , , 10, and 11 shall note the proximity of the
Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement i the purchase agreement.
. The cul-de-sac variance, length in excess of 500 ft.,
shall be approved. The planting in the center island shall
be reviewed by staff i conceptual form.
4. An emergency overland drainage swale is required between
Lots and 10.
5. No storm sewer will be allowed to discharge into the back-
yard low areas o the propsed development.
t
STANDARD C°OI 1~_. O T P
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. as n4 nt and Rights-of-Hay
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or 11y
guarantee its proportionate share of the ~j c ti~i. ion
costs of additional drainage, ponding, a .utility
easements as required by the alignment, der..ktti, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary t
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all pul~li,:i r°
and temporary slope easements for ultiv<_~
adjacent roadways as required by
jurisdictional agency,
4« This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements,
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilitie: essary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering-standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
. detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and
control plan must be prepared in accordance
x 7 , nt
City standards and approved by staff prior to iir,:.l plat
approval.
. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submij L,-11 on t1he
proposed grading plan and approved by staff x zr tlo 1-I'
final plat approval. The financial guarantee s;-£a z_ l be
included in the Development Contract and not release
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
TS2
STANDARD
Q 7g.
h~ MILLS 17OLf'L
n
ap----- t ..y
6 ¢TU
'fa 1
PD
1
_ x
g
t
i
~ CARRIAGE
1~10L' 13
,COURSE A EN ltd / rr lJ (I
G CL
e2 -7-7,
~z~ccr~w°nr~v3.c~ana~x~~~lrow.oszl - ----..-_.,_~,1,~ NUIlIUU~ UNd SUNd IUUUh1 0
Z02 7,AN'6 . 1v~SS3aClkf 3adPb39 tdxK16 ccm g. f.y .A 'v....® t t. o•H
S83NNV-U / S833NION3 / S t1S a z : ® ~
NV-1d kinun ON`d
ryryN',.YJ N [qI`I '1 MOryDJ .,..®.w~,..,.~..w,. , `102i1N0D NQIS02~3 `9NI®da
1 J{~+ WI\Y~`~Gii
®Vd w... d....~ ®u.l ls.ml&®. a~ W o~ a
R~ • • 1.. `3ENNIV~Y `IV-1d AbVNIW4"138d R 4~
..la~a'ts pw ®ome~teu..""a i®.,w®j ~ ,
i
d
• f o
y .1' a b
f 4~ w
rN 2
.1 J O.
f
ci
r c six ~aN
Q tr.
f y7Y ®gs ~ 9 y _
' tt Aa ~ a I~ C. t
M w
Eel
6
t
v
WFSCOTT HILLS GOLF UPSE
.
y (CT ~ 1
°
o
O
lp
L 6 \t\
/g
w
• o
tE ~F ~I r, f
C ~ X8x ~Rk r
%
x r.n
r e Y
®C r 4
c 1>
/ .
X
0 h
O O
t "
i
rf
t{® r
~y is {
PRELIMINARY PLAT, DPAINAGE' °•r ®wri~~g•.ae iy'F«rt®p.«w: ~p
~ hi ® O CONTROL, 9^RADING4 EROSION wpM Sru•n rf IAO1 1 •w • ®019
* U GP9 G a Ne4Mfer•• l••1 fvrooq or gx®w BP• CO.4INC.
`rm U~ a °n a•.. H e•.o hn. H rmn•..x. TRI-LAND SURVEYING ®AND UTILITY PLAN S RS / ENGINEERS /PLANNERS
Q P < h•0i•q t0•ne•M Mrt. A0! b... TOWN CENTRE' PW- ESSONAL BLDG. ^ SLnTE 202
WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION IMe KEE DO(.EROAD• EAGAN, MN 55121
8 5 6.0 t t N" E+t
864.4
EP-3 48" E- \
877.2-
2.,~.
D -s
C1. FL) 126 E-e 42" 'E -d
100
848.0 P- E-1- 2 z E__ f ~a 6
960.0 858.3 e ~ =
TDt, hK 862.8 ti G SCOT, HILLS
D tw t CARFIG,GE
12' ! HILLS _~/L QP-18'SE GAFDEN 0P,-14
I \ P 873.0 833.0
V r
.j-1 ON 854,
882.0 ~ JP-16
L rt
F-- L1 1. .00001F . ~E P=33 874.7
® 832:0 879.1
1.00" JP-59
- '854.0•
-882-0-=7=
J P 4 5 tF `2 8870 a -4.0 8940 ~P-42
I ' 8973 - t2 c 7 8$71 "Y1 L` CT7
888/ N JP-so
r'.`.Tt
881 2 77
JP 4 I -
8923 ~88- .0 1!P { n~, e
8,93.5 12' JP-"~ f5 826! fi.,
885.3.._ er t 853.,_` T
x ~~la♦ :4 i[ L
8870
899.7 JP-32~
-900.% a7 885.7 o JP-3 ► I ' u' 1 1 r
P=44_, 888./ 876.3 JP 39
886 884.0
890.7 .NI r -p r I
8957 a t t t
,>t - -
- _ t
-j- -JPO-19
Cb 30
a1
JP- 58 874.0
• 877,5 882.0
J - g 882.2 `"4
JP-30 a
f 873.0
JP- 20 4\/6,
- -'C T . RCEL
1G
citv of eagan' U" STORM SEWER approved: f r~ r
PUBLIC p+ato
DEPARTEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN
D
l
~Z~6G Nrv'NW-,a e g
v"C' NA 3-0000 33xNae osa, NOIliC7Cld ONE SQNb7®00
202 3dt(1a • 'JQ'A lvNoss3.Xki*i 3e11NM NM0.6 6fiq w Iaq uri 'vaauaff t lY~pa,q o °
S63NNa'ld / S833NISN3 / SWA3AWS m4 W
Nd"ld llnun QMd av w
JNI 03 Eftu ns oNV /-wj. 4Yf •®w 1 ,®ue fu ®+a1 ~Iq tw/a yd
`-1081NOD NOIS083`JNICIVH9
`39dNI ®`lV-ld AHVNINI-138d R
w i
a
®1
(F a Cp
< J r ~ a
m
n rJ P
I
1 0 ,
v p\~ \
10
z - o
I
3~1 0 ° barn
t a, w
y
r e^f
;rUy
Cf)
F--
d
71y~1 xg~ 3 ~ y
a".A a ®
M cG» t y
~ lYl jy; ~ 4
.
~ c
~m 5 51.4 7 2.0
8e
615/80.0 676/86.0 49.6/66.0 ?75/
BQ1® i5 M'7a tQU S +S l1!! 6~ ry~dP _..i 21-
.
24
G
TO ~1 i~53.6172.0 61.E~fQ T 8`IilLt.-
Q •`J
.AD0IT:C+,N t ~C~TT i 1... ~p TG R.
CARRIAGE f, e- t .w. L. 105F
i8° HiLLS
GOLF `161
CCURSE GARDEN i LO'rs
r
0u0
LS 11C 43.3/60. 116 1
amp mm mm am mom am mm, ommm~ mm its
i I
50.3!670
l+'
tt i '
! 14 ,
P
112 50.4!67.0
o16
PARCEL
city of eagan WATER approvad:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENTI
F1
I O G
SUa CR; P r
APPLICANT: I IAI R
CI SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING. (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING.- JULY 26, 198
DATE REPORT: JULY 18, 2988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications hav+ subm ng a2~
of 10.53 A (agricultural) icres to an R-1 (single-faunii1y )
district and a Preliminary Plat consisting o sixtee.ri lots
located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Additions
and south of the Wescott Garden Lots. This proposal is in
conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan.
SITE PLAN/EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 100'-wide Williams Brothers pipeline i sect
site in the southeast corner creating an outlot that Fail'
attached to The Woodlands 2nd Addition. The plat calls for
road extension from Wescott Hills Drive to the platted irL-
Street right-of-way. It is anticipated that this road wii
continue to the northeast and then loop southward connecting to
Woodland Trail. Lot 5, block 1 and lots , 10, 11, blc- )c k 2
will be final platted as outlots since no immedic~ a(,C ss is
being provided to them. A stand of mature oaks i;,3 in one, sout b,
central portion of the site where the stovepipe lots are Degng
requested. If careful lot grading and driveway grading
followed, along with some retaining walls, it may be possibl
save some of these trees. Code requires a 0' minimum widt2
the street right-of-way line. These stovepipe lots are 30'
at that point. All other lots are at least 0' wide at e
typical 0' setback line. They vary in size from 14,15f ~ ft.
to 60,000 sq. ft.; most have walkout `t'hey - CUSC1 11TI
built homes would be built exclusively by William Hui-tile*- .
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill
areas ranging from 1' in the area of the proposed flag lots
connection to Sunwood Trail and 10' along the westerly edge
of proposed Sunwood Trail, respectively. The Development is
proposing a ' high retaining wall in the backyard areas of Lots
7, and 9 of Block 2 and along the common lot line between Lots
6 and 5, Block 2, The Development will be required to submit
detailed plans and specifications for the proposed retaining
walls for staff review and approval. In the proposed house pad
areas for Lots 3 through 6, Block 2, the Development is proposing
to leave the grading for the house-pads on those Lots u to the
discretion of the home builder.
The Development is proposing to convey the site generated storm
water runoff into Pond J-60. Pond JP-60 is a designated ponding
area on the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The outlet
for Pond JP-60 into Pond JP-41 was constructed in conjunction
with the development of the Sunrise Hills Addition. The
Development will be required to extend a storm sewer outlet to
the northerly boundary of the plat. This northerly storm sewer
extension should be designed to handle approximately cfs of
storm water runoff. The Development will be required to supply
staff with proposed walkout elevations for the house pads in the
area of Pond JP-60, At this time there is no way of knowing if
the proposed house pad elevation encroaches below the high water
level of the pond.
There are two landlocked low areas created with this Development.
Due to the fact that the only runoff being conveyed to these
landlocked low areas is back yard runoff from the proposed house
pads, the runoff into them will be minimal and outlets will not
be required. These two landlocked low areas are located in the
backyards of Lots 1, 2 and and Lots 6, and 10, all in
Block .
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff
review as a part of this preliminary plat application. The
following items are required to be addressed in an erosion and
sediment control plan prior to any grading permits being issued
or final plat approval:
1. Lot Benching.
. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should be
included in the proposed plan. All disturbed areas are
required to be seeded and mulched within 48 hours after
rough grading.
. The site map should identify an ingress and egress point for
the site. rock construction entrance pad will be
necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking
of mud by vehicles onto paved surfaces.
e
4. The silt curtain must be properly installed before any land'
disturbances occur. detailed drawing for the installation
of the silt curtain should also be included on the plan.
5. The revegetation of all areas disturbed by utility
construction must be addressed in the proposed `Ian.
. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control rvs,t zr==_,
and after rough grading should be included in the proposed
plan.
The company responsible for maintaining and rem(c a-Ll
erosion and sediment control practices should be `:a
. storm sewer inlet file -rc,in~ ali catch
basins to prevent sedimen_ V , _ into areas.
9. All storm sewer outletting into water bodies should be
adequately protected to prevent scouring from occurring at
the outlet,
10. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be stockpiled,.
11. All fill slopes are required to be 3:1 or .
12. Include construction schedules for rough grading, installing
utilities, revegetating the site, building construction,
curb and gutter, and blacktoping. These schedules impact
erosion and sediment control requirements.-
UTILITIES; Sanitary sewer service of sufficient eptli And
capacity is readily available to the site in Wescott Hills F)_ipea
The existing sanitary sewer in Wescott Hills Drive was p..: ided
as a part of the Sunrise Hills Development. The Development ,,;-iii
be required to extend sanitary sewer service to its rio..,_-hE~rly
property line-at a low enough elevation to serve the r-,ortherly
adjacent Wescott Garden Lots, if and when, that area ever
develops.
Water main service of sufficient pressure and ity i S 1_1~
available in Wescott Hills Drive. The water '.n n
Wescott Hills Drive was provided with the devel, --;t_ o the
Sunrise Hills Addition. The Development will Lw re to
provide water main stub to the northerly adjacent r( >
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is
readily available from the existing Wescott Hills Drive.
Development is proposed to be served by a 60' wide st
connecting Wescott Hills Drive with the northerly adjacent Birth
Street. Birch Street is a platted right-of-way but unimproved at
this time. The Development will required to con tru~c <:n 1
temporary cul-de-sac at the north end of the Proposed
Development. M
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The appropriate easements will
be required on the sanitary sewer and water main service extended
to serve Lots 4, 5 and of Block 2. The Development will be
required to provide the appropriate ponding easement for Pond JP-
0 to incorporate the required high water level and storage
volumes in accordance with the City of Eaga's Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessments which -would normally be proposed as
a condition o final plat approval are being collected/agreed
upon by the execution of Waiver o Plat 14--9-5-.
F
Q SU CREST CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1957 shall be complied with:
B1, 2, B3, B, Cl, C, C3, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. The developer shall note the proximity of tz<e Wz?'.i,:.m
Brothers pipeline easement in the purchase agree n-ent i.(Dr e .c
lot abutting it.
. Variance for stovepipe lot widths shall be approved (lots
, , 5, and , block
4. Outlot A shall be included wi "I "P'A-le We _ u rxf 3 0D car:
the lot line between lots 4 and 5 steal be ex enl ~c)
eastern property line.
. Lot 5, block 1, and lots , 10, and 11, block shall be
final platted as outlot.
6. Development is required to submit detail plans t-he
proposed retaining wall construction for staff r( l
approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and/ u,
plat approval.
7. Development is required to provide an cfs storm sewer
outlet to the northerly adjacent property.
. Development is required to extend sanitary sewer servic=e alnd
water main service to the northerly adjacent property.
R
b
STANDARD CONDITIONS O T APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights-of- a
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to pro vide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
. detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved staff prior to final plat
approval.
. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included i the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date o installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be a
City contract, the appropriate project
by Council action prior to final plat ",,P --oval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning condi!.: 3 o e
adhered to unless specifically granted a. vari«n: by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: august 5, 1987 51 1987
Revised:
LTS
STANDARD
~F
( `may
n
Al
\f
h F G
L
6
~
g WESCOTT ~ t~
O
Hitt ~ ~ A ,t€ s
'GARDEN
co"' TA,
® t Y i a~
L @
I T- i 1I1
W£9COTT
CARRIAGE`
4 HILLS
COURSE 7 " ii
{
D4 I
1
:.I r}Q
rl
tr
7fj R
Gv'rYyoobbs. ~3~.75; 12.o\C
tt, lbb^ l ~eJF f ~ A ~ T
~ ~ ~ ~ •vr ~1 err ~
0/2'
{ { ( l J1
Po ,
SOON -Ono
a
%
/ J tc3 Alp''~ v57
-An
o
;
too, Ron
/4/;j
oil -
JJ~
CL
11-8
n
q, r
o
sQ
i4
1 I
l `
r
i ~ /O
a l~ \ \
~p S
ol -P IWI)
L o
1e O ~
-
R,
CITY OF EAGAN
~r
SUBJECT: RE` T. MIN AR C
METROPOLITAN ON
APPLICANT: MINNESOTA WASTE CONTROL CO I SlvjN
DOUG WARNER
LOCATION: A 0 THE W 1/2 F SEC" T ON 17
PART OF THE E 1/2 OF SEC'. OP? 11
_ ZONING : I-1 (LIGHT INS .L D .1' R
DATE O PUBLIC; "-I G: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 1, 1988
REPORTED Y: PLANNING ENGINEERING DF PARTMET
APPLICATION SUMMARY
application has been submitted requesting a Preli irai:y Plat
consisting o one industrial lot containing 87.82 acres for the
expansion of the Seneca waste water treatment plant located in
sections 17 and 18 of Eagan.
COMMENTS
Mr. Doug Warner of the Metropolitan Waste Control
been working with the City in order to inform the Citir of MWCC13
plans to expand the waste water treatment facility. Presently,
the plat treats twenty-four million gallons o sewage per day and
the expansion would double this-capacity. The property was not
platted in the past and the applicants will include the existing
area as well as the proposed expansion in the Preliminary Plat
containing the one lot.
Mr. Warner has informed the City that this expansion will take a
couple o years to complete but to stay on the schedule to meet
EPA and C standards for water quality, grading must begin this
fall and construction of the expansion will be started sometime
i 1989 with completion date in 1991-1992.
In review of the Preliminary Plat, the problem I-Lich b )c'Ja I
is getting the cooperation of the property c,---- fo- p g111(C 1)
purchase the additional property that they . MWC1__
submitted an application t the City for process.itg; howe=ver, tl"
owners have not signed the application. In discussing this issue
with the City Attorney, this plat should be contingent on Chi
owners signing the application or MWCC condemning the prop
for the expansion of this plat. Both options are still opext t
CC is hoping that the owners of the property will cooperate z;.d
settle on a reasonable price for the property. not,
condemnation procedures will begin.
METROPOLITAN AST CONTROL ADDITION
CC was proposing an outlot on the westerly portion, o the
property. Staff is suggesting that this outlot be eliminated and
included in lot 1, block 1 at this time for the fact that no
access is provided to the property and that this proposed outlot
is being proposed to be tied to the property west, The City has
been informed that a radio station is looking to expand the radio
antenaes for broadcasting and this is one site that the company
is looking at for the tower site location. The City is i the
process of analyzing this to see what impacts this would have on
the Fort Snelling State Park to the north and the east.
Mr. Warner will be at the meeting to give a presentation of the
proposed plans to expand the Seneca treatment plant a the
July 6 Planning omissiion meeting.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The prLp..~,.; grading plan
shows massive amounts of material being stripped and stockpiled
onsite creating two large mounds. The proposed grading exposes
suitable material for plant expansion construction. The material
being removed from the proposed expansion area has a high organic
content and is not suitable for use as a subgrade material for
construction purposes. All proposed slope areas are i.
accordance with City codes and standards.
The Development has respected the integrity of the existing
drainage easement which crosses the site connecting the
sedimentation pond constructed to serve the Kennebec Drive area
and the existing railroad trestle which drains to the Minnnesota
River Valley. Since the Development is proposing only rcuT'I t3.d_:'
grading at this point, details for storm sewer 1_
subject to further review when site developmen details
available for staff review.
An erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted as a part
of the preliminary plat application. The storm water runoff from
the site drains to the Minnesota River basin via culverts ender
the adjacent railroad tracks. A significant drainage c'iannel
passes through this site and needs to be maintained during 11
phases of construction. Several trapping measures need tc he
used to minimize transport of sediment to the Minnesota i
The following general criteria for an erosion 3t `t --31-me w
control plan are required to be addressed in a plan
grading permit is issued or final plat approval:
1. Establishment of Vegetation: The perimeter and
tl
as of this site will require rapid revegetnt=Ml-
seeding and mulching specifications need to beer.: r,
the proposed erosion and sediment control plan :.(A t
construction schedule should outline when seeding wil' take
place.
2. Sediments asins: The proposed stock piles show slopes th v
are too long, steep and high to be controlled with the u
of a silt fence alone. A combination of diversions
temporary sedimentation basins will be needed to
sediment from entering the drainage easement area.
structures can be removed after a nent vegetative
is established on the stockpiles. Design calculat
structure detail should be provided on the plan.
. Cut and Fill Sloses: The slope along the planned south
boundary will be disturbed by storm water from the drainage
area to the south. clean water diversion should be
constructed on the slope to divert water to the drainage
easement and bypass the proposed cut slope.
a
. Working In or Crossing Waterways: The drainage easement
that is located between soil stockpile areas needs to be
kept functional while grading and hauling is occurring
across the easement. To this end, a temporary stream
crossing will be required for all haul roads. detailed
drawing and location for this practice needs to be on the
proposed erosion and sediment control plan.
. Disosition and Maintenance: contact person needs to be
named on the plan who will be responsible for erosion
control concerns should they arise.
ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show no pending
assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed
in accordance with City special assessment policies i effect at
this time.
PROD DESCRIPTION T QUANTITY AMOUNT
428 Storm Sewer Trunk .083/sf 3,166,951 $262,857
Water Trunk $1,315/ac 52.61 $ 69,182
Water Availability
Charge $2,15/ac 52.6 $106,009
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $438,048
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
final plat areas and dimension and the rates in effect at the
time of the final plat approval.
b
CONDITIONS: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
1, These standard conditions o plat approval as adopted by
rY Council action o September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, 1, 2, B4, Cl, C2, C4, DI, Dl, Fl, and Gl.
2.. Either condemnation i -.ited or the
r of fig. , ropa rty
sign the Preliminary r-j-< t application bed" a e pfe , ,r i 4«ry
Plat will be approved.
The applicant must meet all TB and PCA rules and regulations
for the development o this property.
t
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
. detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date o installation.
r
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public imprc°>vements are to be installed City contract, th ~ G,;clropriate project must bc ~v v4
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements a recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 5, 1987 S -tuber 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
J-
a
4 f
k
i
T
# E ~ ~ r M4 t - ~ r ~l
e
b r
~ w
h.
A a
PDU
R-1 M aM
AOQ 2 i
Ind
tt t Al \
tltt tit , ~ s
tl
<
<
UZ2 11-11W
I~1~ ~•.ti .,rte 4
S t
i~.g_.,a ,.os am~w ...G G!' S?®`7 71'%°^ nw itt ti cis r . m... w+e raw
e W mld^® m~o[,. en6 ®a u o~{mom
au''aalalaoasy®
M ~ ua{a1 0 i
110
;ezKe w ~w loll
117
* g r
_U✓ 'Y111 tN"_i e Q E ~
L qqn h 8
b S. ri g 0 K w u V' a
w 1
Q i
Q #a
iq V W O
w w v J
a ¢
J a r va an
_g u s» lg? .e
= as
D FA
W ~R
i ~1: K 'v .t ti 1
5 $ as \ ~0 0{ i
i J `y\
1 1 t 4 ` B
1 I 1 u ~ =•l
i
J ar, 1 err
i
•~4~• t
/ yppp - J► ,~;s
f
E I,a
qa r
~K
xa;:
M
e 1
oa b '
f f~ p t f G v
' ds tip: `4•~'J~ ~t°•'rY ? 1a
t
f• ~ I
i ® j ttww \ 8i ~ 9c d
v'a ~s
R°4
i\
tE~
r~
I
1 ~ R
a '764
' i r
^~crt
E •
a
F
t
s 1
1 ~ E t ~
g
G ~
f
g'l
' { 7di ` .B g:5 P
t •
W 5^t l j~
ti S. yp~+~ itt~ t
sa t rc n
e
~ s ~ o 'ter , f
a
l t
r f y~ it f ~ t I t t 8
VY/~ f ) ` E Y
z'i {gltr
$ JI t
Q~U ~ a''~pl Y•€JdA 1
Yi • r^ t
All,
tx i w 1
t® w
* )
/y
f ,gyp
LC
1 I rya s w
-r
~ •r ~ 'fir `r
l
Er-
t , 03
rr*~
w -m I ^5 e.
q A
m
-All
vP
tt." t B
1 ~ J 'ter? i YI i''\
J ttt l 3
Vk~
S• c f
Z ix
• :{:7.:.'' k': tit ~e~
P_jj
I o
xo:
ow.
ON.
LLJ
P I ° i rP`'y.
L
4 ~ \
r f! 4
f r. p r 76 5 0
A
A_;/
9+
A-kk \ A „ AP-3AP-313
Fr.
09 3 6 B4
s4.4
A N ME` R,
y,
✓AP 4" g
3'D .6
r A-ecc' r~+f P
? 7 lr"` A m --72~ 17
AP-6
If 795.5 A- - -
( $P4.2/°/ f . v f~C P-.?1 ~s ( alb r~A~ ^ `
A -nn
( f {
1 «r/ ~
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG I
city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: standard
mUBLIC
y 1.10RKS
MASTER PLAN
CZ P 1'
o,
v ` o h
t ~Q(
• ' A. (V~
. a .p" I
ee
ar / Pd(~JS
/ 60.7/ 82
61.0 950
703/>'
l:•: 7 0 71.4t Bp:0
83
950
IAL AR
864/
59,8/ 89 i050
84 60.0 Q 89 0
93
0.0 85 / 87 J 16
/;~6 63.0/65.0 Tt.~rJKE .G _
8 5607
~ ~ Q" X5601'°
95
86 73.3/74.0 s50 '
.°.e71.0/71.0 6974 1 96 '
134 /100 "`V4-l 1 I //80111020
Ilk
~kj I? VA 135 12r 133 15 X69.7 610
~tL 5763 0 43t 50
i ~~A• 8 tG d , SO 8,1i AC k d C2Qs~
129 51 1105.0_]
~~.e~~~,r^.. /i' ~~d'G ODNF,YEIJ ~f4 r,~3~ t'~ ?'rs
PARR . {J~... F1
/ f .ti Jr' i i ! l
FIG -14 3
I approved: standard
r PUBLIC plate :
&r
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
DEPARTIVIEN
n
CITY G
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (IG I PARK ADDITION)
APPLICANT: LIRE S HANSON
LOCATION: T 7, BLOCK 1, FUGJ11'.V1 ;v CRIES
EXISTING ZONING: R--1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: L , 1988
DATE PORT: JULY 1, 198
PORTED Y: PLANNING AND RNG I LJE1 I c. z
APPLICATION SUMMARY
application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
for the Highview Park Addition consisting of three single-family
dots on 2.27 previously-zoned R-1 acres located along the south
side o .Highview Avenue just west o Pilot Knob Road.
Lot 7 originally was approved as a single-home site. Other dots
in the area have been split one time; all are at least 100' i .
The lots as proposed meet the -1 requirements of 12,000 sq. yt.
and are 85' wide at the 0' setback line; however, if a line is
drawn between the existing home on lot 7 and the home on lot 6,
the lots are only in the 80'-85' width area. The major concern
i keeping the large lot integrity of the original ighview Acres
Addition. When Highview Avenue was improved in the earlyr '98O 's,
one utility service was provided in anticipation of on ii to
the lot.
These lots measure 23,200 sq. ft., 23,700 sq. ft., and 53,280 sq.
ft. The 23,000 sq t. lots must connect to city utilities with
the building construction. The other lot is above the one-acre
-1 minimum-lot size for mandatory sewer and water use. That
home meets all code setback requirements.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: No preliminary grading plan
was submitted for staff eview as a part of this application.
The existing contour of the land shows landlocked low areas along
the east line of Lot 1 and i the area common to Lots 1 and 2 and
northerly of the proposed building pad areas. Storm sewer is
required to drain these potential drainage problem areas.
Home building erosion control measures will be applicable on this
site. This will entail the use of silt fence down slope from
disturbed areas and the use of rock construction entrances to
minimize mud tracking onto the existing streets. These measures
should be installed as a first step in construction because of
the project's close proximity to existing homes and storm sewer
lines.
UTILITIES: Water main service and sanitary sewer service are
readily available to serve this site along Highview Avenue. The
development will be required to provide water and sanitary sewer
service to each platted parcel.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this site is
readily available along the northerly adjacent Highview Avenue.
The driveways for the new home construction will connect to
Highview Avenue which has a nonsurmountable type of curb and
gutter. The home builder will have to remove the existing curb
and gutter and replace with a drop type curb through the driveway
section. Since front yard areas are lower than the existing
street grades, the driveway should be constructed with a high
point in the boulevard area to prevent the street runoff from
flowing over the curb and having adverse impacts to the existing
homes.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way for
Highview Avenue was dedicated with the platting o Highview
Acres.
storm sewer line easement will be required along the common lot
lines between `Lots 1 and for the proposed storm sewer
construction.
No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal
City requirements for excavation i public right-of-way and the
appropriate sewer and water hook-up permits.
ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show no pending
assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed
as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with special
assessment policy 2-1:
STANDARD CONDITIONS T APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-o-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainag~_ utility
easements centered over all common lot lines urLd adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to p1rolvide
service to this development shall be design ,,A by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering, standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior o final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all r r: y> t;°ary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff pries: to U'ie
final plat approval. The financial guarantee sah-a-11 be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
T#
STANDARD
IG I ACRES CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, 2, Cl, C2, C, 1, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. The building setback shall be on an imaginary -i tween
the existing homes o lots and 7.
3. No setback Variances shall be allowed for newly-ere horue
sites (lots 1 and 2).
Lots 1 and 2 shall connect to city utilities.
5. Development is required to provide a storm to the
existing low areas in the areas of l and 2.
r
i R
PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QTY T
9 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 15.85/ff 140 $2,219
14 Water Lateral 13.10/ff 140 1,834
Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 98,881 5,537
49 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 655/lot 2 lots 1,310
14 Water Trunk 630/lot 1 lot 630
TOT PROPOSED SSE $11,530
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
t
E DOTA
INTERSTATE n -
K
LOST Pup
COUNTRY f k
i
3
~;ate s
LS
r 7t ' LA
P
d_ P P
J ?Po}
D' S n q- -v
a d CC~r~7 .~t"E ax } '
o
qj'
d
r
- RR
R R,
oa~r
__j co N 1
.I - L4Jr j
7LC
h. /I Si
id, ems. ,
GC- Lr
r
w ,
G. •g
M ....y ~ n l ~ t •ir
7,7
i
"~,crF-F i. vi,,cc
-e, s
17 ,Jc/
II
O 50 ,ao ,ii. ~s" .1"i xf ~ti ~ •.S G +fQ ~ J I~i
I I,
1 I
043-00
G21 -0~
.:3• -co
032 -00 C,22-0 0
4
-41
v
_ - o
I 1-Y
,o! m ROA ESMT
~)QC N 53?669
,063-00 1 )82-00 81-00
am. 0 t 1
2-
c
_ X51-00 ~ i 1 ^62-~~~~ ~ 1 ~ I ~
1C c,~ 090-00
a!
HIGHVIEW
09 2 -00 City of Egan
094-00
% -00 1 093-00
City of Eagan s z
_ y w C
s 020-75 C, i
• 4 `d~~°
City of Eagan 9 . e .
030-7 J' J e
4 k~A
ROAD S re
21
,
®r sa
v W
_z
car. H. ,a«v w. 2 WZ
' avenue T w
I$~
i
23 m 30
SS4
SOT ? $ 3^cx
~ ~ ~s~,zeoar' v~oar 1 ,y°°
Z3, zoo If
i_IT GAPAGE WED wEU ee ~ U"T }
~ 2
LEGAL DE P ON t a w
.w r
108 D. ]tf>Q 1. ■ttYBtm sair. i~ A ~ \ , V ~ ..J ~ S
orn, nmr ~t w rTU .m oe .scr»a v ` - t ~ t
® f Q
® \ t _ o g 1
MAP p P ~ y
Aiyl{ fYl
r
qq a
f
i yr
SITE DATA DATE
Mom or
21 , W / rc ffiiS.~ xo)
f y t es
,
or
t AS.%lTl'g ] D~PTt Q~-,¢v /roavxll~ee
- v ra/resa r..y
-2 np~e„/Kr+rR xiiR: n+ a _T HO_
i4 fo -
C'BSOR Tyo,pp 33323°
"e N4.
tT3HEE
_ a OF i
I
s
CT Z&
z "
I ® W '
ton:
I W
N z:
r + E o
w
s. AVENUE{ J va
330 F Ex•M4rpaY lal' R ~P !?1MM Dam6A
i
330
.
&4 9
Krrw.ve s aarr.. 3 va
j
° 33
t
- • 3
:v: ; : s a
> »7 f
-
/ y
r
:E
- s
1
,y
n
xe
c s
T i ti•:.. °
LEGAL DE 1 ® ti>: ::;:;;;:;c;.i°•; r
>oT
.ice F M
H aYQt
8aM
AQr1 ACi&a!
m~ri z
~ 'Q z o
w4
F
® ? ; ; :::mow.: a ac
LOCATION MAP
_;W
4
a
.`1... . e,.. fro" °ll 4ft.A
DRAWN -.By
m TA
r.r
0 SITE DATA OATS
4TE cam Ala. a.n,Ar+. e_y, - 6°6-E~
! Aw a Aerw REVISIONS
A&U 1.17
4Mi
i
IM 33.wo
y IDAAi.i.lsT Iwir 81.1ab as
LAAc IA! l8.aca V
foam- !a}a88a ? mm
• 1E WA®~"" ` xuarw a. lsmuw PROJECT NO.
1.85 eaiaA6eess Ara dei0 ll8A+tw AraY 159
F1 4av Si181
iiLE NO.
SHEET I Of I
S SEWER
TORM TRUNK - 98,881 SANITARY LATERAL 40 F.F.
zozaars I
DO-V M38IN30NMQj ®rra.Ws.r.w v r r ®RWRy ~+ptyjCptjl N8V l"13tliNc?ti
-ld S83N ! S2l33M~JN3 ! St! S I
JNI r «.+.r~w r W»~t »a w
03 JNtA3A8t1S aN}1'1-I81 7 «I .W„ ,...y W~.,Mp,,,,-:,r ONb/ r'9NrQMtge~ r~~~„d3,. ! ~
! r f!•R W ~W P tWW~ W,+ ~ma Rw umnR 9 if
' Ww Woe4 ae6t~~ 9M1~ le. t .1 w MWd ®~e.~, -~tYppyy «1.-~ ! ~ ~ i
~ ~ttll,. le~..,a i I C ~ ~`~tw^rt-1~f 1 t S
t
I I
r
r I
tt I } t
` ~ °P ~ rll9x^ ~ K
r•e Y ~ .q, ~ F s °x V h•tK Vsri .a~ji.-Y °mm W e e s . e e°
x X.
e a ,73:w ...mae•e••`e°••s•a" °.•m°°°°s•m•e• a ea°' °~°.a °~mV04t: e~ ®m °
r, ` 1
f FF r"P ,
f F F r -
Irk
f f
~ I j tf v I ~ gg 9 m. s
J ! Ff tF ~f II h::~;
t ® ! Of
t ® ® r
r r t ! ® t
F ! r f ° , Xi t3
of
t
® 1 ~,r-~ J fi g ~ Q
i
".h Fr"rte r
q aL A t
tt KK
-
q -aN\
R
a N
Ci- Z u}
z
Z
w W
f Z 'Z
a vc s.,.... AVENUE Or
¢ ue r i +T9 t
c : ate... ` ~^f~t°,~': ~ °:44°: '•:°:°::•a vg
` !J ® ~ 9 }Yl~; s4,e .,.Py,`-,.e :,:;;a,e; e:;•;:: e:; i •.o.,.. ';2:
_ `aszao ar a v~7; .'°'',+Cr°::': :e:e:~:; ~a :~}:v:°:^:°:•: :.®e ® a
® 8 f ag8 1, . : J:° °:~~•i`.°: a :;s° Y L
0 X.,
CAPM ® WELL , , :.?1 ° r{{:,. :•t $
: > }a a.: e : a
LEGAL DESCIRIPTION
8M P. PId3 t. ®ICivt>♦ AQY, e¢va~ M \ , ® °eeyl°°•°: e;.;•~y a e°. ° ~p 8®_
ruT nnq ®Pnt Aw w at®ID ® °:°r ° 8° ~y
Oe94Ci W YQ . wPmA \ \ ~ \ °1,.°.•.°.°.y~•:°.°,°°'.~{{°.:°°°°. ry '1 i/.yi
4•< 3 Q 1
°ej U
LOCATION MAP I w
® t cPLA, f
M TA oRCwN BY
- ® S1 DATA _ J A•o.tE
SITE tRM ..1. t. t:...„ 9
s-ES-aI
_ r _ PRf AAP. REYIS,v~s
Asses! LIM 9= )t.- o
Y ` LnaadN8L Sat L.DW PL
lYtz88 EdR ))°tM W
j _®a~^°.s_ _ 41 , ° 98gw0 iRBM 1 ®Ipy °
° ' ® i.)t wtae/ra. Pam ® L PROJECT NO.
1.17 wLRA/rrf M IBty PIBM1r Amaw
lam Leyte 159
Y 494th
FILE u0.
St~EET 1 of 1
X SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 2 TS Immmm:'WATER LATERAL - 1 --.F.
J--
a ww. r. .r+~.Jh P at
d _..J ; -LOST SPUR
COUNTRY 46.0/72
CLUB 1
L? '
/4 a ~0
J=,~t'5T 4'.9/ 2.0
31 Moo
50
2 81 DB~
3 S66,7!6 .0 f3
r'LAT f6~ 492/ 7&T0
r r
r TREFFLE ACRES-i
52:0.1 / 56.5. r
i
77. 780 3 f 3 , 3„
~u
1G
' 1 =
2
`1 w ; a
I I I S C HOOL
j ' ,~Q•- ~ ...1e~ Via' E i ~ P
® 82.0 Ba~;63.0
, 720/720, ..,.SUBJECT PARCEL,
i
city of eagah approved; Stan a r
WATER plate
PUBLIC
WORKS MASTER PLAN
EDEPARTMEN
a
r
A- I
{
LOST SPUR
COUNTRY
^-•a r t'
Q ~ q
~-rC-ST NO 3 } i
a
NNW
_ 3.. F :V LLY
-mmm
73-1
ArF E C tJ ;AY
E F,'
L r
}
{CL TREFFL acR s
-EY
-71 A
PARCEL,
I _ approved: rd
PUBLIC SA-XITARY SEWER plate
ARKS
h MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
n
HP-
60
-c CLUB
1 f``t=CAS f NO 3
to to E Y
GE ~(`r e COL
~w t 1;f ~i
I ,r ~q- f
•
8
° t
8
7 -0
D- b
s•
.894
4!f -E ~ACRES
D-oIL~Y 4 5..4
4
E
t t
! t 1 DP-1 -.j
SYED "
~,Ef,ttiEP 859.: 8 .0 66
D- t Tr;
=cd.rC~ HAG!
!F Y ~ ~ i _ ~ GY
DP- 17
SUBJECT PARCEL
city of eagan' STORM SEWER approved: standard
rE PUBLIC plate
r4,` WORKS
L P MASTER PLAN
.a
CITY O G
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION
APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES
LOCATION: 1/4 OF SECTION 1
EXISTING ZONING : -3 (T NHOU E
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE O PORT Y 18, 1988
REPORTED PLANNING BY: ENGINEERING 1_ ,MEIN~f
APPLICATION U a
application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
for the Wescott Square Addition consisting of seventy-one owner-
occupied townhouses on 9.83 previously-zoned -3 acres at the
southwest intersection of Yankee Doodle and Elrene Roads. This
proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use
Plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The area is heavily wooded near the center of the plat with some
mature oaks and other hardwood species. Along-the west and south
property lines there is scrub deciduous material that will be
removed with either site grading or road improvements. The
remaining portion of the site has been cultivate) a, -d V:e
existing farmhouse is not being included in the pat. That
exception contains approximately 2.3 acres and if it ever
develops in a similar way, access can be provided directly from
Elrene Road or a private drive from the proposed townhouses.
The site i surrounded b developed - and - Wescott Hills
Additions to the west, undeveloped agricultural and -4 land to
the south, and the Gopher Eagan planned development to the north
and east. The planned development contains ad ( US111"E"'ss
zoning on the southeast corner of Elrene Road 1 Yar_ Doo,,31e
Road and light industrial zoning on the no-,-h tide Yankee
Doodle Road.
Both Elrene Road and Mike Collins Drive have been lacktoped but
Elrene is only a two-lane rural road without curb and gutter.
Kost Road has dedicated right-of-way only; the gravel roadway
will have to be improved to full City standards with this
proposal.
A private loop road connecting Kost Road and Mikes Cr l3i.llns Drive
serves these seventy-one units. There is no direct access to a
living unit from any o the public streets. The developer is
a
No preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted
for staff review. detailed erosion and sediment control plan
is required for staff review and approval prior to issuance of
grading permit or final plat approval.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and
capacity to serve the site is readily available along Mike
Collins Drive and Kost Road. The development will be required to
provide an 8" sanitary sewer service stub to the northeasterly
adjacent property and individual sanitary sewer services to each
unit.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily
available along all four sides of the proposed development. The
proposed internal water main system is subject to further review
for fire demand requirements. The internal water main system as
proposed does not adequately service all units. The development
is required to provide an individual water service to each unit.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take
public street access from five locations along Mike Collins Drive
and Kost Road. No direct access to Elrene Road is proposed. The
development is proposing to provide street access to these
centrally located units through the use of an internal private
street system. The development is providing access to the
northeasterly adjacent property.
Mike Collins Drive is an existing 34' wide urban section roadway.
Kost Road is an existing gravel surface roadway and is required
to be upgraded to a 34' wide urban section-with the appropriate
storm sewer system. The easterly adjacent Elrene Road is an
existing 24' wide bituminous rural section roadway. The upgrade
of Elrene Road to a 44' to 4' urban section roadway will be
required with this development. Council authorization of a
public improvement to upgrade Kost Road and Elrene Road to the
appropriate urban section are required prior to final plat
approval.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements will be required for
all storm sewer lines in ponding areas, sanitary sewer lines and
water mains. The depths and number o parallel lines will
determine the required easement widths.
Adequate right-of-way widths for Mike Collins Drive, Kost Road,
and Elrene Road have been provided with the platting of the
Wescott Hills Addition. The Dakota County Plat Commission is
requiring a 60' half right-of-way and dedication of restricted
access along the entire length of frontage o County State Aid
Highway 28 (Yankee Doodle Road).
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: search of available City information reveals no
pen ing assessments of record.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill
areas ranging from 1' in the center portion of th+ site to
approximately 9' in the southwest corner of i- site
respectively. The proposed grading plan attempts to X:. ---ve two
small areas of existing vegetation in the central pt Lions of
proposed Block and Block 3. The development is required to
revise the proposed grading plan to eliminate the drainage swale
along the southerly portion of Block 3. The elimination of the
proposed swale along the southerly portion of Block 3 tell result
in a revision to the proposed house pad elevations adt3:~r~ to
the drainage swale.
11' high retaining wall is proposed along the southerly edge
of the detention pond located in the northwesterly corner of the
development. The development will be required to submit
engineering documentation which supports the proposed retaining
wall design for staff review and approval.
The existing storm sewer system in Mike Collins Drive is capable
of handling approximately 50% to 70% of the runoff ge cited y
the proposed drainage area tributary to said existin_ s
system. The development is proposing a ponding in t
northwesterly corner of the development adequately s.tz d
reduce the potential storm water runoff from the site by
approximately 30%. The development is proposing to construct a
portion of the ponding area on County highway right-of-way. The
development is required to maintain the proposed 0.87 acre feet
of storage volume entirely on the proposed Wescott Square
development property.
onding of site generated storm water runoff is also proposed in
the southeasterly corner of the development. There is no outlet
readily available to this proposed ponding area. The storm sewer
system to the south of the proposed Wescott Square development is
not developed. Council authorization of the appropriate public
improvement to develop the down stream storm sewer system to Pond
J-33 is required prior to final plat approval. Pond JP-;'3 i-
designated ponding area in the City of Eagan':- Co
Storm Sewer plan. Pond JP-33 is located
south of the most southerly corner of the proposed e-scol-
development. The ultimate development of the southeaste,,:ly
proposed ponding area is subject to revision dependent upon the
final profile of Kost Road.
The final details and requirements for the internal storm sewer
system are subject to further review and requirements based on
the final plat documentation and ultimate development of the
adjacent roadways.
The Development will be required to provide storm sewer cAce
to the northeasterly adjacent Parcel #013-01. This parcel rains
westerly to the Wescott Square development. The stub should be
designed to handle a five year peak flow o approximately 4cfs.
s
CONDITIONS: ESCOTT SQUARE
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, 1, B2, B, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, 1, 1, 1, and Gl.
2. A copy of the townhouse bylaws shall be submitted to the City
Attorney for review.
The developer shall comply with all ordinance amendments
approved o July 5, 1988 including exterior finish, garage
size, and impervious surface coverage.
4. All trash shall be contained i the garages until the day of
pickup.
5. The drainage swale along the southerly portion of Block 3
will not be allowed.
. The Development is required to submit engineering
documentation for staff review and approval for the proposed
retaining wall.
7. The Development is required to contain ponding areas
entirely within the boundaries of the Development.
8, The Development is required to provide a cfs storm sewer
outlet and a sanitary sewer service stub to Parcel #013-01.
9. The Development is required to provide individual sewer and
water service to each proposed unit.
1. Council authorization of a public improvement to provide the
downstream storm sewer system and upgrade Kost and Elrene
Roads to the appropriate urban section is required prior to
final plat approval.
In accordance with special assessment policies in i =c t at this
time, the following assessments are proposed as a fuc>rn ition of
final plat approval:
PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
58 Lateral benefit
trunk water main $21.60/ff 854.54 $18,fi`
8 Lateral benefit
trunk sanitary sewer _ $15.85/ff 1,321.83 $20,951
Future Trailway $13.00/ff 854.54 $11,109
Future Yankee Doodle Road
Upgrade $90.20/ff 486.44 $43,877
Future Elrene Road Upgrade 41.00/ff 293.10 $12,017
120 Lateral benefit trunk
storm sewer 2.00/ff 574.30 $14,932
TOT PROPOSE SE $121.344
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and accordance with
the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS2
STANDARD
The following amendments to the Eagan City Code, Cht _ 11,
APPROVED by the City Council on July 5, 1988.
Section 11.03 {26) "Single Garage" has a minimum of 10 foot
width and a minimum of 240 square feet.
"Double Garage" has a minimum width of 2
feet and a minimum length of 22 feet.
Section 11.202Subdivision 6{cL Additional Sev'1 c;', for
In all R districts, all minimum required bu.1ding =a.';s
as stated in Subdivision , Subdivision (A) o this _~c-c_:,_shall be increased by 3 feet for each 1 foot of height" over
35 feet.
Section 11.20, Subdivision 6 In all R-3 and R- zones, at
least fifty percent (50%) of any exterior building finish
shall consist of a combination of materials which are non-
combustible, non-degradable and maintenance free (for
example, base brick, natural stone, glass, and aluminum
siding) or those comparable in grade and quality. No
exterior building finish shall be sheet aluminum, asbestos,
iron, steel, corrugated aluminum or untreated block.
Samples of exterior building materials shall be submitted
with the application.
Section 11.20, subdivision 6 {i Architectural Standards. In
all -3 and R-4 districts, architectural plans shall be
prepared by a registered architect and include (a)
elevations of all sides of the building; (b) dimensions of
all structures; (c) location and screening of heating, ai°-
conditioning and ventilation systems. All sides of ~ "
buildings shall be treated as a front with the e
architectural treatment.
Section 11.10 'Subdivision {c} Multiple Dwellings, Including
Townhouses, Apartments and Condominiums.
1. No detached garages shall be permitted. All .ar es
shall be attached or underground.
. On all buildings, at least one (1) enc A or
underground garage space per unit and at least c
outdoor parking space per unit shall be provided.
4
I
d
t 4-4
SOU-d'~=Y-N}GHLVA~( P&f3 28- eYA~d6EEE-C30E?4 E F?C3AQ}- - }
-
_ r -
1 ' ~ .r.3_v r 71- P~
wl ~ [ ~ t i ADO,tY3nK +aun, nFnr' rtow - -I 1 y I k A3SOCIA TESA
Iv O{TTLOT $ I
j SITE DATA
° p e { ' ZONING R3 andnwJ CLUSTER
TOWNHOMES
EXCEPTION f
NET AREA 429,524 9.86 ac. of
f - r - WESCOTT
t
° F• e A F ~ p UNITS 71 SQUARE
~a
R3 I
a 4 u f - to 0 ~ I DENSITY 720 UJA
}~5 \ ~ t3 ~ ss ' i i
77~~ to ) I
O / I 1I <e _ e9rao oo _ i r~ . ao rr .-.A~^
Rq,e \ I
N.. Hotzon
ie a 1 sa A \ ss 1}{ Homea. 7
~ Z ! P. 0. Bon 1367
x az zn sa \\V /
t ll! C aPb[a, A. t,n
55640
6t2/473-4055
3 1t V~ \ I~~
i1
e 3
Q £ t to
J0 f C~ae w~ .-11 3,:c
rxt
o a 1 43 ` ( 31 w lrsaa -
L X `
e 1 A3 wz as si>z [-1
I ~ i' F ♦ •R if 40sa cv69Y c 1&100 90 DY f)dR L-~"^°~
v~-~ a4 ~ ct 1~ t ~ ~ 1 z 'A n cr¢caID
i I t t, u 9 { I f t so r wn.m 3 zsav nutm~nmao
a3 aP N ~ 33 s0• ~
® \ to \'l ~ ~ ae ~ <a mom. ~ Ai.aa. p .z
- r ee ie~ w 1 e
_ m i.
s3233
_ - ftO 1~--~-~ ROAD---
A • °4 ~ ~ ~ for ai aria
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS
i60Ci 9
r ~
YICW[TY MAP
55121
art PRELfitNARY
PLAT
,
t:._ G~ tr e
Jr,
4.
'ZI
Lr^^"G./ • i~ wE9C0iT t P f..j
CARRIAGE 76_;
S
GgL119
C I IQtS
P OURSE GARDE"
1,E6 r
~ARHIACE _ -~L/__.~..
H IL l3
l GOLF ~bEN lC~ s j
J r-~ . ( 1 COURSE ~F\ t.._.lF
G(:)f III I
E 5 GQl
a~
6
Jz: 0 10, 011
l ! ji
O O u ¢ Y
1 Cl) a9 M P _5 ^ ~
Q' CA H of 6'
4 ® L__f $
N O 0 W YY
~ U a
a w 'Y~ir4U i
~~f11t'/r,f ~1~,1'l~tlrk/`r ~Sf r' r i~x
8y ( / ,1
oll
\ \ , tsM tal' H+M Y N •n n a.y 4 ~t i '
jcv "r
Ail
-XI
! r f J , 'C? t
1
r 1
a i
t rr •
r lr 1 I l} r i p
r° f'1ft, !'rr i t t`` d /r 1 /dd/ ~ ■ ! / ~j w
J ~ ♦j
I d+~~ I / / 'f" l l 1p' a0~ n7o dno' a
/
oil
it F 1.
4
~iih Ir ~tr 'r I( ~ ~ t~ ~ 4 _ ~`.6 ;i~~-~rf ~C~~~~ ~ ~
02
t '
U) u
V('I r Z
j ~E i t I I
* I I 1 t
I of P ~737~ r~'. _ ~d4 / l..i }
j1-
DIL /jv--
A $ s
SrrE DATA
ED
G R3 ~w C,-tISTR
ZONIN
a 1 TCINJNS-IOt."
J / ai- ) { Pl
ii \ OF
_ _ - } % C7N 1 1 i i S t - \NET AREA 429,524o 9.86 AC.
_ i. _ g (t 1 l ~1 {I tt WE$COT7a
f1 lBUtLDtNG 81.850 td 19.05% SQUARE
, SURFACED 900,525 23.41%
R.
3.- ' 'f's GREEN 247.144 1 57.54%
as ®wn" n i `1 J 1~ _ ~4 fl It #ti' F1N(~u 71
FTY; 720 U!A
Now
FIT
fJ } \ t 1 f f _iY
z P, 0, s
%
l~i tt° stv47a-Sri
Ill 7fill'
il
HI t1i
%
s~~t
i- }
17
1xTC' WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS t {
z
ff, ID t
ERt7S - 4 . -.iL CETAtt
I
I
LOWER UPPER
635 SO. FT. 1099 SOFT.
4io° ' by
® - TRANSMON UN[T PLAN
LAUNDRY - D R. -G -
UTILM DINING D.
FAMILY ASSN .u7
\
'a ffCHE LIVING
BATH r >e,..
j~ BLUSTER
1 TOWNHOML
,Illye. OF
WESCOT-,
r I BEDROOM SQUARE
DECK ABOVE C ^`6 DECK 3
fl i 1
j BEDROOM
Now 11 Fi
P. O. Box 13,
.
GARAGE om,
Mane spots JA?
- -s S
III ~ 612J473-46
11 MASTER BEDROOM
I CLOSET
_ - er.
otn %
. ryyt as 2'~ 2{c bt
~csuc.~.exvma+s
PROP LFtES
BEDROOM
r' MODULE
BATH
MODULE
. r
KITCHEN
~,.t,., MODULE
KEY PLAN KEY PLAN TRANSITIC
STANDARDIZED PLANS UNIT
i
-J
+®a® o_w.c-woM a aaoocurcc
au wxarara uaenven
8
I
E ~Qk4 G r* q r ~
IL
±w
41
MOT
_ -
5 u
N
wti
ol~ a
n
M n
o
a ~
y o .,xl .r.~ ,c
p m
o ?
z - 4 !I!
ZO
+ Ed _~s a
U
I
W
m
as 0 6! c
r (V Q
p. L+a
C~ K
LIT
'I'(t C7
v' a 0
o 4 ~~y ~
0Cq a~
z o Q Q
qo
S~ 0
>U
m a Htt~' : tf
bu
10
I -
m ia..
I Lx;
4T
z z z
U- U) U) z
o a
0
cc u
il
y
7
1
I( I
i
w I1 w
i I
z
z. f :d (i z
.
j
j
Y I urwa ~ D R L.-SMf
t _ ~ ~ roar TY' aTS, ausmF rACtTw ' Boor
~ tssocur
I 11 'f
➢«wo Krec Er wEnFOOY I zc{ i re➢FOOr K c Ew CLUSTEt
- + - ® TOWNNOt,
OF
M
{"ail K. SOU
➢w.w ~ RcHer~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +crtcFR ➢.a,o ~ 'uvwo
_ L DK~
~ - rAtTTw •[DFOOr k - ~ @ _
:.'~rQ HEAFUUr OE➢FOOY = -
SEE SHEET FOR ,r-
Foor ~ UPPER R AND LOWER
PLANS.
u4~ r
i
FE➢FUOY
i- - Now lior'tzon
P0, Box I',
FE➢woor MFSrtenjsais, t ~
UPPER LEVEL 612/473-A
➢wiaF
` A cru-au . -
' ~ w lAYIiT i ~ ~ ~ .
FOOY /AMAT
gg§§++_ FOQY
""`I!!ry 9[ rAAA~ ~
E➢FaoY CLUSTER /T Nw TU `d UNIT
wE - "'°°°°'°'y ewt- K=ohoaY
AT.
- t° -d a ua
IwEDFOO a Y Y~.w M NEDh60M
t
6AMpE y _
fKY+iT ~ t
FflUY
L
Pi
I-WER LEV;-a. TYPI,,AL CLUSTER l_MN
q, vrrr-r
L1 ~ L1 ,
I~1 y ~3 t k A3..Gt Pw.u.
our~or a
~'1 SITE DATA
i ® • • ( ' ` , t ZONING R3 ax:r«od CLUST-R
z I
o i ' EXCEPTION TOWNHCM"
of NET AREA 429,524 9.86 ac. OF
' dII
30 a i Y • °S WESCOTT
" R3 a a • { ' 4 UNITS 71 SQUARE
t•
_ " • ¢ OENStTY 724 UJA
to it
1
a~®®.~a tt 9e
i H ■ {Yf i° i
' 8s r• IS~T~~ N ~ SKAO ~ a 18 A R 4m u~ iT K^°ti' _
~ tm
f b S• gq I' _ et}
_ e® H I ~ g a ant dt Me. Hortx r
. E® {1 I H se A M tat a{ Ho T h
i 2 ;f E P. O. Box 136,
Z u 80 is 1U it sot s... M{-,.
J o ® if CC i8' doe of ss98 554
S ® s ' w 812/473-40`.
® ® ` ® 9{ P U1,11-11- ®t ® inf s N y g
gg 1
14 24
U C3 ~ ~ ~ar
q di { fi tm y
3 h ` 'p • u ~ am as aor w sdxa n 46.'_
1P
AA aPCCY'ID ^...a
3 I v ' H ~ a am at Sue msm ♦ BitN A %m aaPx
1 9Q • Et ~ t 1 mES.vt { emux w n
s ix iT ri a4 i 3 ® w i ease q rt a rae . p n
® ® 4a ..a .dr.E
f• .mod,
W~
- raf"'
_ KO5T - ROAD-- ~ - -
A R4 ~t dE
WES OTT GARDEM LOTS
•4ou E
I
LATERAL BENEFIT ATE TRUNK - 854,54 F.F. vic"uTY YAP =g==
5572b
10 i 11 0. LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK STORM SEWER _ 574.30 F.F. ' R
PLAT
f
u`
® J__ ~ r-ry S
r ar8 -
P%
0 , a b ~r
~z w .;1
s 4a ~ Ya f~~
4.
a
~I
+i ~ f
z ,r
y f
t
i
K 3~
1
uh L,
~ 7~ l I $E 1f I ~~~i{~v ,,'5((5.
71
LLLJ,
4
e , ny
R
O
f
Ll L PD
- i
7!5, L. c: r lj, :.-p. OUTLOT B 111I1ii t w .
-+h { a ] \U+~ s.. c 11 SITE DATA
ZONING R3 Qa: t••] CLUSTER
TOWN!-iV,11-
ur - a EXCEPTION NET AREA 429,24 9.86 ac. fM J ¢ o
OF
4 a e
30. # a \ S WESCOT
i a ® UNITS 71 SQUARE
R3 /y • i
fa i Q
a DENSITY 720 U/A
t• Y8 ! 1
91 t
9f
{ N
R4 +
a as 9f
ai P n -
M
. 1,~ a ~i s• ss of ~ ~r • w R sum „ Nox F4ortrrn
0. 8qa A35Y:
O Z u ]O as w'i Mi
J] ® C[
= y. a -i i 6 554
°9 _ lU 12141.1 i1'_
® < # f ]I t : if al as
u = i • as ~s rxa
i ~ • » N PaCO t tus. R R y21
ai w S . nn
KOST --ROAD-
_ m ®°T a BtD iy
A R4 dd
WE3 OTT GARDEN LOTS
!
1 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD UPGRADE - 485.44 F.F. Y,C1NiTY 1IAP=T
5512b
f LEN ROAD UPGRADE - 298.10 F.F.{ ' i ® R PLAT
r.
-~rr-
'^'~S?`YP.'~78^.~'»"2t°.?"`71 ;^cxsz+lyrr^m•..e+„.--n..
Ll PD
_
_ ~ !J' ~ Rc... amca row _ _ _ I' ~ _ { ~ ' ~ Y A3SOCIA: ~
> a i SITE DATA
cc w
=n
• • , + 1 ZONING R3 ax CLUSTER
o ° • TO W NM7Mc
` a EXCEPTION NET AREA 429,524 8.86 ac. OF
° UNITS 71 SWESCOTT
QUARE
3 l a ~
s s . ®a
R3 t Q~
DENSITY 724 U/A
0
tT
"DO--- as m n , -
4 ar u _
P _sr
Is 3a
a• ~r i~ n NsM F+wtzan
tR LZ 1~ t i0 n ;nT I!
co, a} P. O. Boa 9387
Q Z xs TO K c W t avx IH yd;....
Q I~ ss4`
o ` - a IT
a» „ » 612/473-d
,R UJ t 05:
® 2
t0
` If nx9
3
8R „ ( N lE2 ii
yW Q 8a }i qqq ~
T M ~s • is ~ Wa u ilY S.: a.
' ~ T trn 11 54i OvasX 4 t41is C n ^tII ~-r'-C'
1 f H M
»T » ~ c~TT.R a xia.f xi4 n
r. IT 3T T• / ! 1 1 .rl} x0 n li sor tat>a[>mon}
Y ~ *Cn
• » ~ }a toiu. saw aBests
j aATT
I ItM
KOST ' - ROAD- } I !
x aaw
t. "..'_.t+e r..r.-.. _ r.a.y_. _"-e.-w-rawx- • *.s an4
A
wE k MEN LOTS ~ coi u
mmmm y R R H
S
LATL b= , . BENEFIT SAN T Y SEWER TRUNK ~ 1321.83 F.F. _
- Y1CTH (TY YAP =.~rv
' TR1L 854.54 F.F. 5512% - - -
- 5 V 1 P1 A
a
i ,r~Rt
b
4 & 4 s. ' C C c Cy - -.-J -
-11 VV 8 9. -
856.0 856*0
84.
24 48"-- -
1E 3
876.3 E-c
877.2
e 1 4 ~ ,
r; r
E-e 42
_ C~. F 7 X 26 i ; -;d
27 E :;tea
f 48
848.0 _c
858.3
862.8 SCOT
_
-
9 E
WESCOTT
w '
CARRIAGE L
N. HILLS E-h kk
GOLF
833.10
_ _ ;
854.873.0
. s.7, } a,q ! 882.f1 f
J{ "{L.7.Y J i
'33
8 3 21.0
JP-59 ,854.0
8870 064.
394.4 4. - 4 2 879.7
X973 = 887.1 1 2
a\
888. ® N J 881.2
SUBJECT PARCEL
.
1
I of eagah approved : standard
PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
M
f.
~ r.
1,41 C, ~.rr)TT
r
1N ESCO i
_v
HILLS
C}LF
GARDEN LQ TS
r
1w
t
D~,
H,
, 1
'SUBJECT PARCEL
Flo
city of eagan'
, ppr v sate -~4rd
SANITARY SEWER :
PUBLIC
WORKS
MASTER PLAN
ITI
E-ATE
51.4 i7 2,0
3 4
5160.0 _ j 67+6/66.0 49.6!66.0
~ )2d'('6 24u
I8" ? 9 180,~ - 64
1,63.6/ 2.0 1T BG~ L
17.1/32.
ESCCTT i GROt
11
4DCITiON '
CARRIAGE N.
?FILES
GOLF
I GARDEN ~ LOTS CCU S E
Do 13.3/60. 16"
' l.2 ~ y r
I I -7-
50.3/67.01 PAR
a~....~...,,..., _ I ,r'j (,..:,1~ r--.. _ ,...r• ..d 9 i Lam;.
r:
CEL
A
Plata 4:
PUBLIC
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT