The URL can be used to link to this page

04/07/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MEMORANDUM O: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION O : KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: APRIL 4, 1988 SUBJECT: COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 7, 1988 The regular Commission meeting is scheduled for 7:00 P.M. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Following the approval of the Agenda, the Minutes o the Regular Meeting of March 3rd, and Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 26th, should be considered for approval. There are seven (7) items on the Consent Agenda `-r the commission's approval. A staff memorandum has been prepar,~,d on the seven items. As always, the Advisory Planning Commission's packet concerning the items has been provided - towards the back of this packet. There are four (4) development proposals for commission review. Each item has a separate cover memorandum included for your review. The second item, Bridle Ridge - 2nd Addition is 1-3=.~rhaps the most difficult review item. A thorough review c' the memorandum will assist the Commission members in the discus,,.=Ion at the Commission meeting. Staff is continuing to work with Sienna Corporation in order to clarify and resolve the remaining details concerning a parks dedication within the project. There is one (1) item under "Old Business", which is the trunk storm sewer for Rahn Park. Members of the Advisory Commission may remember this from several months ago, in which the Commission reviewed a trunk storm sewer line which affected Rahn Park. At the time of the review, the Commission made a recommendation for the storm sewer line to proceed through the property owned by Federal Land Company; this property is located to the south of the park. The storm sewer would have been within a street. request for rezoning of this property to Commercial was subsequently denied by the City Council, and the storm sewer project did not advance. However, the need to provide a controlled outlet to the pond which is located on th,_ t edge of the Federal Land property, and adjacent to an existil office building, still remains. A new feasibility report has been updated. Parks Planner, Stephen Sullivan, will be walking alternative alignments in anticipation of making a verbal report to the Advisory Commission on Thursday evening along with the consulting engineers. There are three (3) items under "New Business", the first of which is an Arbor Day resolution. A separate memorandum and a copy of the resolution is enclosed for your review. The second item under "New Business", is an appointment to District #196, Community Education Advisory Committee. Sandy Bert, o erly filled this liaison position. It would b:~ appro r' for a member of the Advisory Commission who --e-id,--,s in the boundaries to fill this position. A )f,,r of the ~p nt staff could be appointed if there is nc j .e by ato fill this position. Currently, Sandy Masi._, is liaison °_o the #191 - Burnsville Community Education Committee. The third item under "New Business" is a request for placement of Bluebird houses in Wescott Station Park. Staff has received a letter from Mr. George Traynor, of Windtree Circle, requesting that he be allowed to construct and place up to ten (10) in the park. The City would not b- responsible fz- maintenance, upkeep, or house location rithin the parr . Traynor would also be responsible for ral of the the City's request. A copy of r. Traynt- s letter i e_ic1.c 1 in the packet with a recommendation by tAe staff to allow Traynor to proceed. There is one item under "Park Development" -)ertainin T t_ne Winkler/Jackson neighborhood meeting. Th- r`_--hborhoo-_ 1e 3M7, was conducted, with a second meeting see: fc --,21 12t a:t> fi concept plans that are now being deve', >'r staff. Sullivan will make a brief report on the outcome of 1E,hL neighborhood meeting. Two items under the "Community Center" concern the establishment of the selection committee for the architectural process. Staff has proposed to the City Council, aril will e reporting to the Advisory Commission on Thursday -:.in-, 'kd7 the selection committee consist of the Council, staff. It would be appropriate to select n= ~ ~ s f -om U) e Advisory Commission at the April meeting, in order that communications can be directly made concerning time and place for those interviews. Also enclosed for your review, is a memorandum prepared by the department entitled "Pool - Informational Study". There are five (5) items under "Other r --,,.ness anc -its"", including a parks maintenance report, copy of V letter to the Fairway dills residents concerning Chmann Park. You w 11 also find enclosed the executive summary from Decision Re so. , concerning the survey, and as always, recent departAIW t happenings. If members of the Advisory Commission have any concerning items within the packet, please feel free to cs.wc: me directly. If you are unable to attend, please cont:a C- the office to notify us of your intended absence. jbls AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, April 7, 1988 7:00 P.M. Eagan municipal Center Call Order n Pledge of Allegiance B. Annroval of Agenda C. v al 4_ Minutes of _ jrch 3, an, i r Special 14 _ c 6th. Consent ~,-;x (1) Country Hollow - 2nd Addition - Progress Lan Co. (2) Crystal Ponds - S Construction Eagandale Center Industrial r 10th d iti n- opus Co -ati n (4) o itfi . Use Pernoit - n ~ mpa (5) Olson Adc" °.tion - Dori & 4y dl n (6) osfor A itio - John Kara.a osfor (7 Whispering Woods i°.io - Burnsville Lomb E. Development Proposals (1) art view Elementary/Middle School A*L'-.l Fields (2) Bridle Ridge 2n Addition - Sienna Coyc (3) Stafford Oaks Addition - D. H. Gustafsoi ~ elba= (4) own Center 100 Sixth Addition - Federal end Company F. Old Business (1) Trunk Storm Sewer - an Park G. New Business (1) Arbor Day Resolution (2) Appointment to Dist. #196 Community E .Commit ee (3) Request for placement of Bluebird houses H. Park Development (1) Winkler/Jackson neighborhood meeting - report I. Community Center (1) Selection Committee Appointment (2) Pool Information Study I. Other Business and Reports (1) ar%s Maintenance Report (2) T•,,rr to Fairway ills esi (3) Ave summary - Deci io (4) Department Happenings J. Adjournment T MINUTES F REGULAR MEETING O THE ADVISORY RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 3, 1988 A regular __,_ng o the Advisory Parks an -eation Commission was cal"isd to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursda March , 1988 with the following Commission Members present: Dick Carroll, Michele Swanson, Wayne Sae, Sandy Masin, and Bob Porter. Staff present included Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect/Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan; Par'-,'-'s Superintendent, John VonDeLinde; Recre .ion S,u,. p(, rv "_--or, D Peterson and Parks Secretary, Cherryl T Gonnriaj~ i Tvfz=1,1-1 , t~s:! s not present included George Kubic, Jc.a : ..l', and AGENDA A motion was made by Masin, seconded by Porter with all members voting i favor to accept the agenda as presented. MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 4, 1 ETIN:' Page 12, the fi * Agraph, should , "In re-.ri proposal to grade t' it was lea there was ~f ~f~c~°; to include a retention area (dry pond). It was discovered '==.:by the Engineering Department that the retention area would be required to be i the park area since the existing storm system could not accommodate the water. I the south and southeast area develops it will create a even larger area of run-off than exists now, thus the ondin is needed. The existing run-off is projected as follows:" Page 13, paragraph 3 under DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS, se.ce,,nd line, the word "movies" should be changed to "monies". Page 13, paragraph 1 under ADDITION To AGENDA, line the word "coerative't should be "commemorative". With the above changes a _[z _d, Dick Carroll mc;.a >d, Masin seconded and all :n'_ers voted in favor of e;; tin( ~ -i February minutes as amen 1. 1 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of March 3, 1988 meeting Page C-, NT AGENDA The following consent agenda items were press.-:- for approval. On a motion by Porter, seconded by Masin, ....'.i all members voting in favor, the Commission approved recommeiCation to the City Council of the following items; 1. PRETTYMAN HEIGHT- - That this plat J c dedication req.i 2. COUNTRY HOLLOW-21ND ADDICTION That this plat b sut,4X to a cash dedication requirement. 3. TOWN CENTRE 100 - 2ND ADDITION (PIZZA HUT) - Tiara. Chis plat be subject to a ca h dedication t consistent with th City's puy_i"y fur commercial/industrial prcp_-_y. CLIFF LAKE CENT Dale Runkle., City Planner press ted an overview of the Cliff Lake Centre located north of Cliff Road and east of Rahn Road as it impacts on the existing access to the center vera_ 3 the proposed realignment of Rahn Road. Mr. Runkle indic d City Council acted to approve t h- preliminary Tuesday, arch 1st meeting Witt. following chz v - Council, Department of and the I 1. Protect Cliff Lake area more than previously Signed and shown. 2. Setback to be a minimum of 50 feet from the 890 water elevation. . No more than 70% impervious surfaces. Mr. Runkle also noted that th a original plax 321) ,0fu0 square feet of retail space had n reduced by 63,0)0 s feet. In December, 1987 the concept of using Rahn Road as an access road was discussed based on the redesign of Rahn Road to limit stacking on Cliff Road. The plan would move: 7,1-thn Road easterly so that traffic would f(-ed onto an inter- -i - ~ .Q,, to the center therefore lessening 4- , 4 -affic can Cahn c from Cliff. In defining the ~ str li Fz 1 result would be 67,000 square et for a per V lue, ,000 square feet for retail space, 114,300 s °u ! 1-c, for Ta, g0..'. ~:-.nd 2 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of March 3, 1988 Meeting Page 3 6,000 square feet for out buildings. Mr. Runkle n s he-:, iAan was approved with 0 conditions and a feasibility--t was forthcoming to support the action. Mr. Carroll asked if some of the mature trees in tk e, c red e -n space around the parking area can be saved. Mr. Runkl- spc-ndc.,, that the grading plan shows that possibility. He als d ca d that the large outlot on the corn 3r of Cliff and Rah to be left more natural with as many tr 's remaining as pons'°.. Mr. Carroll rt-4 1 41-1at 4- 5 0 nerimeter 3= the lake, the move____-~r _)i -ttie, L ad a.,~, _-ell as the c-r of green space as improvement:, sho%.n thus f-r should be app lain'. oc1. Member Porter questioned if the existing Rahn Rc):A o k abandoned in the area where i is planned for real.+,.i Runkle stated that that was a possibility; Rahn wo _ 1,_< Cliff Drive (or whatever the name l for t h c, el accessing Cliff Lake Center) to allow flow. rw~ r, the Council has requested a study to s wises Hahn Road s -ko " ( be located. Member Carroll suggested that rather than destroy the portion of Rahn that would be abandoned, the City should ler.ve the road bed, fill in the ditches to accommodates parking for f-h- existing park area. Director vraa suggested th-°' part of would be covered over to allow for futi dev~~rW., i., . ~cparking, and there is the a tral_ .-.inn oii t east side of Rahn. Ju.^ter Ln,1icat__.A_ the w 14--inn alignment was positive fo:_ tY' park ar L and moved for p1_-)rcva1 if the hook up of Rahn Road is north of the drainage area and the abandoned right-of-way is retained. Dick Carroll seconded the motion with all members voting in favor. EAGAN I SCHOOL, SITE PLAN Ted Rc b °=a~ d the . ~te.t _ c~n of the proposed athleL-I.c iielCl= nor the Eaj ,i .xuol. the concept was presented to show the ov, l.yout of the h3_gla school and it's facilities which are bord red on the north side by Northview Park Drive, on the east by Braddock, on the south by Diffley and on the west by Eagan's Northview Park. The nhs°:~ portion of the property is rolling terrain and fay°ollard drop in elevation from Diffley to the building of 4 1_ high school facilities are directly adjacent t q.,hc hiq'h s. 1 building with the middle school athletic field: --exit. T _'L existing Northview Park athletic fields. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of arch , 1988 Meeting Page There was a desire to sink the football icl less offensive visually to the people living from the facility. The field will be 2 feet Road but with erming and vegetation to sc_ 'ic noise. It is felt this will be a comfortable compromise for -he surrounding residents. In addition, the lighting will be re'v from 6 to 4 standards that will be raised higher so the li: will be directed down onto the field rather than filtering ir- adjacent areas. The traffic must unload o the ir. rior -f tl a football field near the parking lot so this, too, sr-uld i.s the inconvenience to the neighborhood. Dick Carroll questioned if the '-.11fsoftball fields are exactly as they have been presented i. the past to which the answer was yes. Sandy Masin commented on the soccer field overlays on baseball fields and the need to make the best us- of the proposed facilities. Bob Porter asked if there wo-t-Jid 3 a fence around the area. Ted Rozeboom answered sayin be a 4 foot fence around the track and an 8 fool _ rr.~nd t"%, facility. Director Vraa disc cd the existing pr-,vr ';:,i~ sor a trailway on the south side: of Northview Park Road., t side of Braddock Trail, and an internal trail system that con ects with the proposed trails within Northview Park which would follow through to Bridle Ridge. Dick Carroll moved, Bob Porter _ _)nded, t ?.1 e:~~ voting in favor to concur with the plug, of School athletic fields based on the high school site only. FIELD UTILIZATION AGREEMENT JOINT POWER - TENNIS COURTS Dick Carroll expressed the need to change thfa, wording Page 4, Paragraph A. Schedulinq, of the Field U t document. He felt it should read, "The City of ; annually submit a request to School District #196,:= ;,a {Y School/Dakota Hills Middle School Athletic Director for the of the High School/Middle School fields." The tennis courts being planned will be located on the southeast corner of Northview Park adjacent to Dakota Hills Middle School facilities. There are plans for 12 tennis to be built on City property. The tennis coy;, is woul - 1;e biji I C by the City of Eagan, paid for by School Dir-4- ' -4- 191-' , 4 by the City of Eagan with School District sirs," i y i_ scheduling their use and the City given access- after tliat. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of March 3, 1988 Meeting Page 5 Bob Porter moved, Dick Carroll seconded with al' _I5 voting in favor to accept the Field Utilization Areemen' based o the verbiage suggested for Page 4 o that document by Mr. Carroll and the acceptance of the Tennis Court Joint Powers Agreement as presented. School <rict 196 q_ A ahc7 ee Ie for watering the _elds on the h'icih b :~hool an(~ middle c"- =moo' sites. Director Vraa indicated it would je the responsibility o School District 196 to determine their program for watering their ball fields. Vraa suggested that S.D. 196 may want to maintain the condition of the fields so as to protect their investment. THOMAS WOODS Parks Planner/ Landscape Archie t_. _ Ee v the background for Thomas Lake Woods indices l ing the parc( part of Blackawk Park Planned Development with Lie ar1-L< dedication occurring at the time of the original PD. The p is located west of Thomas Lake Road and south of the Higi-,1j.EY Trail Corridor. The northwest corner of the site abutts i~te southeastern portion of the proposed Willmus Park. y~r~. Although the developer has fulfilled the for I' is property he is asking to Out' of B irk purpo_ The developer would also to donate Outlet C with the provision that he will o the grading work if t h- uit*r will construct a trail link through Outlot C from the north cul- de-sac to the Highline Corridor. Member Carroll questioned the 20 foot tic-l 1Ealk. change over the 300 feet of proposed trail a--.- at - t t M would have. Steve Sullivan indicated this was t• t would be found in the Highline Corridor, but st: s may be necessary to bring the trail in line with the contours. Staff will need to take a closer look at how the trail will tie into the existing system. Commission members discussed the surrounding areas and how that will impact on the trail usage. Member asi questioned if there were any disadv-nt-;.<fr putting the trail in Outlot C. Steve Sullivan reE-aonC - fha.- trail will take some time in planning and engin the advantages to the people in t hte surrounding the timing necessary. Dick Car-ell also stated F _ 1 will save time for those wanting to get to Willus Park. 5 . Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes for arch , 1988 Meeting Page Dick Carroll moved, Bob Porter seconded with al' voting in favor to accept utlot B as a donation for 6u'.1 and that Outlot C be a,--- with the fol' provisl- 7-,ns, a. Developer to Le ~w =sible for tl.e grading, with the City to d to ie the appropriate to maintain consistent quality) and the City be responsible for the trail surface. b. Developer to include a 8 foot bituminous trail link on the west side of Thomas Lake Road. RAHN IDGL 2ND ADDITION Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan _ i for the Commission the history of this parcel. It was on-` a part of Mission Hills Planned Development and zone('. I Business. The Commission previously reviewed this Outlot F of the Rahn Ridge 1st Addition. The '.c t i;_z_-~ was completed for Rahn Ri - - 1 st throuc t~. thr~ :n ~ A, B, C & E (Vienna Wood I) for t-ttat p v + i of 1--ie p1 ~t designated as a future ch-rch facility - Lot 1, B1o~k 1 a I twenty duplex sites. Steve Sullivan explained that the parcel typicall-v (Irains from north to south. Approximately 2/3 of the site i- ~,iYco used to drain through an existing fifteen inch storm sewer t =U -into the pond within Vienna Woods Par',-.. The fact thtz~C ipe does not have adequate cape-t_:i - e, h, Il a this yak, it necessary to consider sc ? t Live s. Parks Pi, Sui__ van reviewed the following alt --ti. . 1. Replace the existing 151' storm sewer with a more appropriately sized storm sewer. 2. Use the 15" storm sewer as well as construct a '011"d one that would be extended to the pond within Woods Park. 3. The developer can provide on-site ponding and use. existing 15" storm sewer. . An additional storm sewer line can be extended long the southern edge of the development, cross Pir ~-Y, bypass the existing pond and outlet into a poding area adjacent to I-35E. 6 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes o March 3, 1988 Meeting Page 7 Steve indicated tha`_ by using either alters s alternative 2, the bounce ?f the pond is such that r good the trail in a couple of a: Sandy Masin was opposed to both alternative 1 and 2 having them clarified by Parks Planner Sullivan. Dic'_- moll concurred stating that this property was originally -zed commercial with the 15" storm sewer shown. He exj his frustration that again, there was a situation where, f beginning, this was not sufficient to accommodate the run-ot questioned why this continues to occu-. Member Porter indicated his ! x: of Option 4 much better long term solution than any o the other option . Dick Carroll indicated the greatest need was to get water avvay as quickly as possible and felt the developer should be ul t -.rca taly responsible for same. Sandy Masin moved, Dick Carroll eclonded, with all members voting in favor to recommend alternat the solution to this particular probl well as th L being responsible for a cash contribute G.1BO OO MEETING - Wi .V "E'R JACKSON Director Vraa briefed the Commission on thi3 need for a neighborhood meeting for the proposed Winkler Jackson Park. suggested a meeting date of March 2, 1988 at 7:30 p. . Commission Members agreed to the date and would provide representation from the Commission at the meeting. COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY Director Vraa explained to the Commission that the over,-11 response to the community center was very positive bu° that thf--_ was a great deal of work to accomplish. The estir-v 1 time for this project would be at least 1 months. L stated that he had met with City Admi-_i ` r ttor Vic Ellison and Commission Chair Dic. Crrol ~a status of the survey and try to deter `ne the<:.i u way to accomplish the multitude of tasks that yell n- I to be completed. Director Vraa explained the first step was to draft the R.F.P., to then instruct the architects who will be bidd'n the building as to the process the City of Eagan uses, foil ,y Phase I which will be selection of .,i archi" ,ct ut_ Ll'i concept plans based on the define' oe ne I fo center. From that, preliminary >u e e nr : nt plans would be refined and then on to th preferr?,d I,(, alternatives. 7 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes o March 3, 1988 Meeting Page 8 Director Vraa proceeded to revi i at< ' I different aspects of the planning and t~_- uY°~l . . tic- 't crucial aspect at this point seems to be whether th C relm ` s ion is prepared to move forward with finding an architectural firm. After questioning some of the costs involved in cb'' :irv= architect, Member Masin indicated she was ready to go ad finding an architectural .irm. Dick Carroll moves. r Masin seconded, with all rs voting in favor to r adoption of the draft sce,'le received this date. With all the information regarding the community center, Dick Carroll felt there was a need to have a special meet.' r workshop to review items the Commission would need to soon. Ken Vraa indicated some of the components do r1 be addressed at this point; that rill ocClr <<' refinement. Member Carroll sug 'he Con take the information home and _ view 1-)re the workshop. Director Vraa stated that h( _ i provi' ent information to the Commission member., for review T the workshop which was suggested for Saturday, March 26th M. With all commission members agreeing o the date, the w: 1:) will be scheduled at the Municipal Center on the above refe_i-e ~ date. PA Parks Planner/Lands Architect S' ulliva; the Ohmann Park plan for the Commission's _,.!w and au_ . A- background, the Commission reviewed the change in this p 1 of land due to the ponding area that is to remain a part of .h park area. Steve Sullivan explained that the ponding area to be there for water run-off. The inclusion of the " .cr area eliminated the green space originally planned in th :_,n lot area . The pond would be a dru pond. IT 1-i t of a 100 year rain, there would fou bound e wa r will stay in the pond for 9-1/ hours. pith a 10 'ain . would be a one foot bounce with the wat r remaining -.r 4 ho' Steve went on to explain that the park would have building similar to the Rahn shelter building, aofn~~!._: i:3_t and 3 soccer fields (300' x 2001). Mr. Sulli-, r the pond will infrequently flond and that t- S,, ~9 P mostly sand. Director Vraa ' I that banks could be used as a oz comJ C f t with the changes made this i.ould be an :xcellent neighborhood park. 8 e Advisory Parks and Recreation c"--. `7-don Minutes o March 3, 1988 eetin-j Page 9 Member Carroll asked about the possibility of flm°oding the ponding area for skating in lieu of having children: Cliff to skate a Well Site. Steve Sullivan stated that t ld be something that should and could be consider e,7. r asked if the soccer field.-. would be lit for I it was indicated this could be a possibility °t->"'t interior soccer fields. Member Porter felt the - st.o~-ii d. 1 a sign advising of the possible potential for ligh°' in _ 19--b , '.c' s as a consideration to the neighboring residents. It was ' that the soccer fields would be approximately 150 feet fror, me' nearest property line. Member asin asked if the City Cou ,il had c Commission's i satisfaction with 1 ing the 71-1r, anything be d- to remedy the situd ion so +-Y ? ~vti occur again. W.L..-:~ctor Vraa indicat--J that ~1; ~ Jx,-~ v -1 meetings with tl Developer and Engineering Depart:n,~~n' r < c ng this particular issue but that there have been no guarant-es given that this will never occur again. Dick Carroll questioned if there was cuff' black dirt for this park and Ste, Sull-,.° df t , would be looking into that it u- Director Vraa explain. that S,---ff is also looking at putting the two soccer fields on a plateau to enable the rotation of field lines and also to use the field as double fields. Staff felt this was worth looking into to see about obtaining greater use o the fields. Member Masin u boned who Auld b for the pond. Ste, Sullivan i gyred th t : t t r_=f 11 grade the ponding area, do the cavation and 0, o uLut. Dick Carroll questioned if there would be be--L -Wig; a uun the pond. Mr. Sullivan stated this would not be nec-=_ssary at this location. Bob Porter moved, Sandy Masin seconded, with -11 voting in favor to accept the concept plan as preh_ for Ohmann Park. UPDATE - YOUTH T " LEll " -CI TIO Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson, gave the Commis 'I an update of the meetings that have been going on z,_a September, 1987 between the various athletic associatLc_: A serve Eagan, the school districts serving Eagan resi Iit.--- Parks and Recreation Staff. At the last meetin+ was that the athletic associatior r moving 9 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes o March 3, 1988 Meeting Page 1 sharing som^ r-rams . It war ~ tk - 4 boundary lir, for the middl ? ~1+ determine whe e the associatio-s we -ld lrrI~J h .i i t'gs? marketing programs. overall, the meetings are producircj very positive results. DEPARTMENT E I " John VonDeLR sit ~ ~ zlk `'upera - ~ >nt t Commission that abr. h- A --,-,ntly T -ivy.4 ;r National Arbor Day Assu cia'io stating that an had k selected as a Tree City, USA recipient. The Parks Depay ,_I.,,nent. will receive a plaque and award from the National A ..k.c_' Y Association for the City to display. Member Carroll that this certainly makes s appreciate our "greeness behalf of the Commission offered their congratulations. Director Vraa indicated that ' .r S ev leaving Sunday, March 6th for "----'Ca C1'-'-) o community centers in the southern Wisconsin a --d Ch t_.v,~c- are . They will be video taping the sites they visit so that- they can share the different facilities with Staff and Comissit embers. With no further business to conduct, Sandy Masi , Dick Carroll seconded, with all members voting in favor to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 P.M. Date Secretary 10 MINU'T'ES OF SPE j °SEETING ADVISORY PARKS AND CF'.' ATICN COMMISSION SATURDAY, RC 2, 1988 Chairman Carroll called the Commission meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. Present were Members Carroll, Hennes, 7wanson, PorA.--, Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa and Tanner, Sullivan. Purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed R.F.P. so that the City Council could take action on April 5th. The Commission then went through an anticipated time frame for the community center study through the end of Phase I. Staff also nevi with the Advisory Commission the proposed Phase I architecUu, 1 services. The Director then reviewed the draft R.F.P. with pry Commission noting minor changes. He responded to t:n a .ions concerning establishment of a $35,000 fixed fee for fi..st phase architectural services. Commission discussed the fixed fee proposal and the consensus was that this was a workable and preferable option. Mr. Carroll questioned that there might be a problem ~f Ph selected site particularly with sufficient par'Kin M, continued saying that the City should set an exampli_ to the developers in regard to the impervious surface materials and screening. Mr. Vraa responded that there is concern for the size of the selected site but that the architectural Phase I program will be responsible for reviewing the entire municipal campus concept to integrate the already existing facilities and to insure the center will work o the site. Mr. Carroll then asked what facilities impressed Director Vraa and Landscape Architect Sullivan o their recent Chicago trip. Director Vraa and Landscape Architect Sullivan then briefly reviewed several of the visited facilities including the Hoffman Estates facility which was built in 1986. They stated that this facility was significant i that it was composed of an activities gymnasium, track, fitness center, program room and administrative staff offices. Staff also felt there was excellent use of materials, good staff/building orientation. Discussion of Northbrook indicated Ez> rood managemer_'_. diversified programs were the success to this facility. ''r. Vr a and Mr. Sullivan also discussed Robert Crown Center, which was a example of unique architecture and good materials but that the facility did not work well and that maintenance was a serious issue. Addition of a studio rink, approximately 60' x 1001 in size was used in many facilities. Staff stated that these were used primarily for lessons, children's programs and open skating. 1 Youth hockey up to the middle age groups also used this for instruction. The use of the studio rink was financially successful and took burden off the main ice sheet. It also complimented different ice users. Director raa then went on to explain the 3 the internal organizational structure tc process and the architect. He then ex,..l__in .r of several sub-groups within specific to,jic -nd facilix_., rclas. The focus groups would have direct access to the architectural team, through the Project Manager, the Advisory Co mi-aion, Administrator and City Council. The focus groups woul;.J r!tinue through the entire design process, and if a~ap.~~rtir= :or construction, would also be available to insure- c,ul--ility construction techniques. The Commission then reviewed the concepts of architectural objectives. There were general questions from the Advisory Commission concerning the process, time lines, facility priorities and work groups. There was agreement by the Advisory Commission for the materials presented by the Staff. On a motion by Porter, seconded by Swanson, 'it :11 members voting in favor, it was a recommendatio, Advisory Commission to the City Council to accept the dLc-. . . . THOMAS LAKE BUILDING Director Vraa reviewed an issue that had recently arisen with C112 Thomas Lake Park building. He distributed a memorandum ad a~>>F~~d to the Advisory Commis--ion concerning tt historl !-ta facility, noting that ° archil . > estirr~,' or c uction costs exceeded planned budget. Mr. Vraa stated that the total park budget as contained within the project was $450,000. The construction costs to date w+;s approximately $171,000 and that additional services were- neighborhood of $22,000. The remaining construe-tio estimated between $116,000 and $125,000. He then re_ C°-..r alternatives for the Advisory Co), ' -;lion to d possible cost for the building. Thee--e included from the Park Site Fund, a reduction of the buildil-la, , redesign a new program for development, or proceed with Ibid''i h deduct alternatives. There were several questions regarding the proposed bud_p.)".- the cost for remaining park development activities. Mr. 1 questioned which items might be reduced from the struet~i Commission agreed that the learning area and pit ould be -le most logical. This could be an add or deduct altc _`n«'Live. Porter suggested that perhaps the project should 1:,c, a.llowe, to 2 proceed through the design and bid stage in order that the Commission could deal with real numbers, rather than e.st s-~ates. He went on to state that perhaps an addition-il $10,000 the Park Site Fund would be appropriate noting U increase i~ the program statement the Commission has made. r ~ were ac-1i.ional questions by the Advisory Commission membc rs, after ~ t4hich a motion by Carroll, seconded by Hennes, with all members outing in favor that the Council approve the plans and specifications for the Thomas Lake building with alternatives for deducts inclu~ing the learning area. The architect is to review -~ho structure's open air window for cost, a '--h ``c -Lnd al"F to compliment the prairie setting. ~'.nd, ni -1,1, if' l exceeds $160,000, the items should e~ th a y Commission meeting on May 5th. There being no further business, the Advisory commission adjourned at 10.50 A.M. 3 _ MOR- NDU11 TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEVE U I , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER MARCH DATE: 30, 1988 : C~. T 1,GENDA 71 1 1. COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION - PROGRESS Lbi_1TD COMPANY: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a P z-ning of 13.53 A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1, (Singl_ ily) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 32 ~~!_c>-°located north of County Road 36 and east of the Country L ow lst Addition in the -E 1/4 of Section 23. CO 1 TIO The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 2. CRYSTAL PONDS - ASP CONSTRUCTION: Preliminary Plat o 13.7 R-4 (Multiple) zoned acres for 137 apartment units and a Variance for cul-de-sacs in excess of 500 feet located south of Hwy 55 in the N 1/2 of Section 12. RECOMMENDATION: The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 3. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 10TH ADDITION - CORPO TIO• A Preliminary Plat of 23.61 LI (Light Industr*1_3l)~r=s containing 2 lots, Conditional Use Permits for Lla-Rber facility with outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, ►d a pylon sign, and a Special Permit for a fence over 6 f~Gt located north of Lone Oak Road and west of Lexington Avenue in the SE 1/4 of section 3. RECOMMENDATION: The plat be subject to a cash dedication and a trail be placed along Lexington Avenue. - D_ 'MBAR C~ ",r7Y: 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A Conditional Use Permit to allow an on-site residence for a mini storage facility located on Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located west of Hwy 13 in the SE 1/4 of Section 8. R CO E_ _ °"s IO The l ba subject to a cash parkland dedicaE_101. 5. OLSON ADDITION - DON AND MARY OLSON: Preliminary Plat o 1.05 acres of R-1 zoned land within the Eagan Hills West P.D. for two single family lots located along the east side of Rahn Road north of Shale Lane in the N 1/4 of Section 29. _._n_ The plu - be subject to a c; parkland ded',,, t~ on and an S foot bituminous trail be placod along Rahn Road. 6. HOSFORD ADDITION - JOHN AND KAREN HOSFORD: A Rezoning of 5 A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (S ng.F.I Family) district and a Preliminary Plat contai) ~i aq 4 located south of Deerwood Drive in the SW 1/4 c-'.ion . RE-- TION T h- plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication and a foot wide concrete sidewalk to be placed along Deerwood Drive. 7. WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION - BURNSVILLE LUMBER: Rezoning of 5.7 A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district containing 14 lots r.nd a Preliiid-- ry -Plat of 27.7 acres for 57 lob inclu ~.7<11 a Variance for front yard s(~-~t 7jc:ks luc of o.L o«d in the SW 1/4 of Section 31. RECOMMENDATION: The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. MEIN .i'DUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION O : STEPHEN SULLIV, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: APRIL 1, 1988 SUBJECT: NORTHVIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/MIDDT C11-k- OS L The proposal is for the pre-,liming'-y plat of 3'~). 2 Lwo lots. Lot 1 will contain th^ School and Lot 2 will C?3.'~ _ I g 0, idT hl0 c fields. BACKGROUND The Commission has previously reviewed the High School/mic;dle School site. This included the evaluation of the bui1and the High School athletic fields. The middy fields were not included. The Comma - approved the field utilization a--- ant a.e A d, nt School District #196 and the City c T n. 3.; i 1 t specified joint use between the City and school district for Northview, the High School and the iniddle School athletic fields. ANALYSIS The proposed plan indicates the - l i+-i n of 3 h4 1 1_ f ' ; with soccer field t Flays, o f °iding 'a 1 1 a football/track facility. These facilities lie direr'ly souEJA of the Northview Athletic Complex. The utility plan indicates direct to water outlets with energy iscapators at the south edge of Northview Park. This water once discharged flow directly into the park. Currently a por-son E the site sheet drains into the park. The sheet '.n< the storm vn+ thus minimizing ar ' ---sion. r from a pip( d )rrce creates incr€ T ani storm water in a small area thus =sulting in a - such i :er potential for erosion. Staff recommends that the school district revise the utility plan to exclude direct outflows other than sheet drainage into Northview Park. The layout plan incorporates a trail circulation pattern which ties into the High School and Northview Park. FO COMMISSION CIO The Commission may consider the following recnm andations 1. Approve the facility and it tic 2. The school district to i s the util4-_t7- plan t direct outflow from a pips bource to Northview Park. XE O DU TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION O : STEPHEN SU LI , r, C I C" f i:J NE MARCH 1, 1988 RE*o BRIDLE RIDGE 2 ADDITION BACKGROUND The proposal is for the rezon ing of 166.99 ac-es agricultural to a planned dev~~ pi R-1. This afi.c nc- ~ -3 preliminary plat of 251 single is lots. The Commission has previously reviewed the Eagan Hills Farm PD and Bridle Ridge lst Addition. The parkland dedication was fulfilled for all properties described within Exhibit B in accordance with the developer; providing a $104,000 cash contribution, a land dedication of Parks 1•-5, and rough grading of Parks 1, , 3. The Commission should note that the park dedication obliatons were fulfilled for t-- -5.95 acres of the Hall property as part of the Eagan Hills Fa. PD. PROPOSAL The current proposal includes 49.47 acres located within the original Eagan Hills Farm PD, the 25.95 acre Hall property, and 91.57 acres located west of Bald Lake. This 91.57 acre prole-=xLy, described as Parcel A, has not been reviewed previously by commission nor has it fulfilled its parkland dedication Exhibit The developer, as a result of the current plat, will dedicate Park #3 (Exhibit B) to fulfill the remaining parkland dedication requirements for the Eagan Hills PD. The developer wishes to convey and receive parkland credit for a .2 acre greenway from Bald Lake to ortview Road. This greenway is located within the PD limits but was not included initially as pr <lind according -a Exhibit B. Lastly, the developer i m. 1 ate 6.85 within Parcel A, which encompasses ld Lc-xr 111 its south, shoreline. 1 ANALYSIS Staff feels that there are several issues which the Commission should review i regards to this plat: #1. What is the parkland dedication value, foi greenway from Bald Lake to Northview Road? 2. What is the value of the proposed Bald Lake parkland dedication? . Does park greenway allow for a trail above the high water level of the ponding area? #4. Is it appropriate tt "ltocate an 1 'alent~ po r- ~ of parkland dedication from Parcel A to the 25.95 «4e Hall property which has fulfilled its parkland obligation? I #1: Northview Road greenway is approximately 2.2 acres. The acreage breakdown is: 0 .7 acres/ponding area 0 .8 acres/flat to moderate slopes 0 1.34 acres/12o or greater slopes The parkland dedication policy 3.F. reads as follows: 3F. To be eligible for park dedication c. wit, 1(- --I is to be located outside of dra.i., s s, fl, :1 plains or ponding areas after the site has in developed. Grades exceeding 12% or are unsuitable n=or parks development shall be considered for partial dediction. Where ponding has been determined to have a park function, credit will be given at a rate o 1d0% o the and and adjoining land area below `.h?r level; a minimum of 70% of land above ,,,t-r mark shall be dedicated before pond credit .jL'1a-nted. Other City park dediction policies relating tc) pond dedication must also be complied with. According to the policy, no credit should be given for the pond and partial credit could be given for steep slopes. The reenway does provide an integral link from the PD greenway sy uci from the High Sc oool site and Northview Athletic Pert- mdc.-:r to continue the greenway link, an 8' bituminous ou' Lr-i 1 should be constructed along the north side of Northvie Road the greenway east to Braddock Trail. This trail link will take pedestrians to a safer crossing and link to the continued trails 2 along Braddock and on the south side o North-,-i--- P,,-)Ed. I -n respect to the trail link, staff asks the Commissic-- to partial credit for the greenway area based on ac ponding area. The developer has provided a 30 foot width above the high level of the pond within the greenway. Due to this being slopes, Staff suggested that the rear property lines of th,se easterly lots be shifted easterly. This should provide adequate area for a future trail link. Iss #2: The deve' to dedicate 6.9 3 partially -al-ill t..e sbligations for ta~he 91.,,-7 P c A property. The proposed parkland dedication acr =age brb a ,p,a, G is: 0 .65 acresf12a or greater slopes 0 6.25 acresfponding area (Bald Lake) In review of the overall to-,,,-)graphy the x. is approximately 100% steep The .65 consistent with discussion of past _t-°gs j- arch to providing parkland with po~ential a- L. vo Bald L , In regards to the 6.25 acres of water, tb proposed dedication includes only 250' of shoreline. The remaining portion of the dedication is located within the high water level o" I . The Comprehensive Park Systems Plan does not act- z Lake for recreational intent. Therefore, staff -5 acres of water has no value towarc parks d ti- no credit should be given. The develc Las to dons.: lake to the park system. The Commis; • an, t. ,re, shoul ' consider parkland dedication value of t h- .6.; acres of shoreline. Issue #3: Park 3 greenway provides a continuous: trail link in ..o-n, junction with the Eagan Hills Farm P;). This has ?or d Lc1- , _a' its high water level, will floc-d the trail corn' a during the Eagan Hills Farm P.D. review requir i tna °._s,c areas within greenways, at the high water lev-1, :4 pedestrian passage. Staff suggests that the developer review,, and submit a revised plat that provides for pedestrian corridors above high water levels within Park 3. Issue Lastly, the developer has requested that an e uivaler' dedication obligation from Parcel "A'l be transf(t 1 to the acre "Hall" property. The Hall property .s -`ulfillec: iv parkland dedication as part of the Eagan Hills 'arms PD. The proposal would now have it assume a portion of the parks dedication requirement for Parcel A. The preliminary plat will be final platted in several phases in which the Hall property is 3 ce par' 'i i he 'i: to the last; ri a plat, the devc LO'per would pay '.ham: mc: ai r.,. " °r i~;-~- fees, however the timing of pay-ent --oul_- 'i~- late:c^ in t a development. The developer does not currently own the Hall property, but has first rights for purchase. Therefore, if su -1 an arrangement is to occur a three party agreemnn4- UTA necessary. Staff has reviewed this with the City_ at r concluded that such an agrrnment fea; .t. ' e . _ e at recommended that the c,- relc- prow d : this, for review and to di tine i it would be i, a rkv~::>s of the City. O COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following re-- °rrrlotion for rezoning of preliminary plat of Bridle Ridge - 2z ,-',Tltion. 1. The developer r ceive party l x ? as determined the i"o fission { 1 Lake/ ort vi-,.. .&,uu3 green,..- . . An eight foot wide bituminous trail link be constr__' on the north side of Northview Road from BE.'J Lake/Northview Road greenway to the intersection wf Braddock Trail. 3. The plat be revised providing addit. ial a the high water level for a ti it cc ,ion , , t rz? n Bala L ll;e/Northview Road gr-- -y. 4. The developer receive partial park dedication c re.- it as determined by the Commission for the .65 acres of soreland abutting Bald Lake. 5. The developer receives no parkland dedicate)"', C. for the 6.25 acres water area within B ci ke developer should plat the lake for pr v_:. the N . W . L . and the water area be donat° sad;c . The entire lake from the high water -'-v--' _,',,Du? d. be placed in a drainage/utility eassement. 6. The developer revise the plat to provide a continuous trail link through Park 3 above the high water: level of the pond. 7. The developer provide the 1 1 documentation for the park cx _r ~ e I- Parcel A' to the Hall property, ~r 11C t , given to the developers proposal for rks edicati transfer. . The developer provide a park dedication cash contribution. 4 tic '~..EL~ ~ 1.... ,-~..1. _..,.l,r-•-, ~ _ I 1• (I ~ 1 r . I ( , ! Y ~ ~J v EJ - ~ y~i I { a a ~ "t R ~ x JL:° , • i „'14rr; i F. A _ r A7j a ' ,14 k x ~ pss 1 ~ ➢YAa~~ 1 ~ ~i ~t ~t ~ ~t 1i~ ~ s i ~ ~t~r b.. rs ' ~ r q a~ ~ ~ k EXHIBFT 11 1l Vc n P a r PNA `.575 CRt4LE P,' A0 atT4rs ,r IMtES t Q7 At PARK $7.1S *C. - y-^'-~ r0*yat watfa Sit Y. PARK # 161AE AC. 622 aL EtoDG Et1 r. 12% t GREATER SLOPE .55 ac. POH4NG-wORw AL ELEV. r PON?t+G-t:TFRA!'T7EHt : ~ t t, ET ,e - -1 EA AN HILLS FARMS w`w PARK X tQ7AE AC. t5B at . f 121, t G=EATER SLOPE ISE ac PONDNG-NDAVAL ELEV. , + _ - . _ PO4:Opa G-f.T£RVTTEHT - l y$. Eagan, m n. PARK 9 ?CT AL AG, IS 93 ac. rr -154:r r>a tYt° A t•1\ 12k ; GREATER SLOPE a 7E ac. PONaNG-WDAk*.AL ELEV. AE st. t PO'a7:G-I:TEfirs'17EH7 437 sc. - FART. t TCTAL AC. 111 sc. ae t y21 i G=.EATER 5:C?E t 95 ac. POra a -N4R1*AL E:.EV. .x® at, Ppti r+-t.,Ea•°gE+at t.tt.c PARK ANALYSIS PARS; 5 747A1 AG. a4 sc. ------S ~ 121 A GREATER SLOPE S3 ae. PONyra!=-nORa°AL ELEV. 7.1 sc. - PO•:; reG-t.TEa*tT7Etd7 t-1 st. tit at T 10RA TO: PARKS ADVISORY RECREATION COMMISSION FROM-. KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR F PARKS & RECREATION DATE.* PRI 1X 1988 RE: AKS ADDITION O S . The proposal requests the rezoning o 1. zcres -1 i tt, Thomas Lake Heights Addition to a planned d relopment and an amendment to the Eagan 40 PD. for 328 it units. BACKGROUND The Commission previously reviewed the subject parcel as the Deerfield Addition which included 322 apartment units on 32.2 acres. The current proposal has purchased 1.9 additional acres from the Thomas Lake Heights Addition and now include-, 118 units on 34.2 acres. Parkland dedicati n obliaatio for .1 acre l parcel is pending. The porch 1.9 ac=:es hee, filled its parkland dedication aF = ~.t Thomas Lake Heights Addition. ISI The Commission will need to determine the following items. 1. What is the current parkland dedication requires! of the developer? 2. What consideration should be given in provi°14 pare 44ca- tion credit for proposed on-site recreation 3. What are the trail obligations? The current proposal has a density of 9. unit ar acre. purchased 1.9 acres which currently is rau- ~o pr y i,d a parks dedication. Based on a 9.," i, i_~; and 1.9 acre park dedication adjustment, the credit tows dedica- tion would be equivalent to 18.24 units or $7,362.00. The remaining 309.76 unit would ,be subject to the parkland dedication requirement. 1 The developer i also providing several recreation facilities within the property. The Commission should review the value of those facilities and decide whether the parkland dedication cash contribution can be reduced. The Park Dedication Policy reads as follows: In those cases where subdividers developers of land provide significant amenities suc'.1 , but not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, handball courts, ball fields, etc., within the development for the benefit of those resid- ing or working therein, and where, in the judgement of the Director of Parks & Recreation, such amenities significantly reduce the demands for public recreational facilitL,_,s to serve the development, the Director may reco- visory Parks & Recreation Commis io ghat th punt of 1, 1 to be dedicated for park, playqrcu a and opell . (or cash contributions in lieu of sucl "ication) ' reduced by an amount not to exceed 25% of thr amount calcu- lated under paragrph 2. RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION The amount of land to be dedicated by a d elope- -_-~ial ` based on the gross ar sa of th Via" proposed type of dwellin unit and u t.y. d t- 1985 resulted in 3.5 x idents in it , 1 _ 2.8 e r duplex, 2.1 for townh= -~fquad, and 1.9 iL~r apax'F n'` s; this has been used as density standards for formulating calcula- tions in meeting the criteria of park needs of Eagan resi- dents. The developer proposes a vest pocket private park space within the development. The facilities and related costs are as follows: o Tot lot/$5,000.00 o rdcurt/$1,200.00 o Tennis Court/$24,000.00 o Sand Volleyball/$750.00 o Picnic Area (landscaping & tables) $3,800.00 o Pool/$26,000.00 The subject parcel is locted within Park Service Dii:~'..ict #28, which currently has a population of approxin,::i' 2,400 people. The proposed apartment complex would an ad- ditional 700 people. These 700 people equ Le to ap- proximately 29% of the population of the current park serv- ice district. The projected 1990 population for Park Serv- ice District #28 is 2,532, which results i 27. repre- sentation. The park service district does inc_u quiv- alent facilities within several existing and ropvv z parks: 2 1. Evergreen Park o Playground o Hardcourt o Tennis Court (Dbl.) o Picnic Area 2. Winkler Jackson Park (proposed) o Tot lot Hardcourt o Picnic area . Thomas Lake Park o Picnic Area 4. Heine Pond Park (proposed) o Picnic Area The standards for recreation activities in accordant Park System Plan indicate 1 >ingle court for 1,750 r--it€t_~Iz The 2 existing courts in Eve,-green Park would s s requirement. The Commission h~ :ot previously given `zt swimming pools in view of the fact that they are not typical recreation facilities within neighborhood parks. Due to the par- cel being located o the parameter of the park service district and approximately 1/2 mile from a neighborhood park, the Commis- sion may gave consideration to providing no or partial credit for the tot lot, hard court, sand volleyball and picnic area. The Comprehensive Trails Systems Plan indicates a trail along both Thomas Lake Road and County Road #30. O COMMISSION CI The Commission may consider the following recommendation: 1. The developer pay a cash constribution for parkland dedica- tion. 2. The developer receive a 18.24 unit atj nt for ur- chased 1.9 acres. 3. The developer receive no/or partial credit for the proposed recreation facilities. 4. trail be placed along Thomas Lake Road and County Road #3. S/bls 3 MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY & rECR aATIO N c,ta FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, L:AKi ARCH ITEC,i: ~ PLANNER DATE: MARCH 31, 1988 O CENTRE 100, SIXTH ADDITION - FEL`a L LAND COMPANY 2rj proponent is proposing a Comprehensive Guide Plan ffiirc; ; and a Planned Development Amendment (rezoning) of 7.3 acT:r« f limited business to Community Shopping Center within the :v,gan Heights Commercial Parks P.D. BACKGROUND The Commission has previously rep, z; the Eagan Heights Commercial Par-: requirement for the parcel has been . ulf_ll_...: ws a of the P.D. agreement. The Commission has also -vi -ed the property in conjunction with the Waterford Apartment °o, osal. The Commission may recall that a trails study was per: i ' to determine trails locations within the Eagan Height-, C-1 --ial PD. The Commission evaluated trail locations an 4 ities based on user needs as generated by the differing The Commission previously reco---- :z d that trails/ 1`<.s b placed (See Figure A). o On the north side of Town Centre Drive from Lexington Road to Denmark Avenue. o On the west side of O'Leary Lane from a E, F D Road to Town Centre Drive. O On the south side of Town Centre Driv to the western boundary of Waterford apaz tl:,C~ 1 . o On the west side of Waterford Apartments from Town Centre Drive to O'Leary Park. o On the north side of O' Leary Lake from W d, : to the Spur Trail on -Arest side of ents. 1 o On the oast side of Yankee Place from Yankee Doodle to Town Centro Drive. dYS The Commission will need to determine whether the re< E~ trail locations be revised as a result of the change in 145; according to this proposal. The proposal places commercial shopp . c tt (CSC) I) "-h the southwest quadra:--t of Denit-i A.? 1 This land use will -ri.maril, ; fisting limited bus i (LB) e< the proposed Waterfc d Apartment. The -mite '~L i 1 r1 is primarily offices, i.e, dentist, doctor's and professional services. The Commission concluded that a trail along the -cuth side of Town Centre Drive versus an external trail tUir - to O'Leary Park would be more effective in providing a trail tion for limited business users 1d empl .Y t the boulevard trail would also ° ffectil i tion from the limited busine:- as com e,_,A P.D. Staff evaluation of the proposed change to commercial l.r.d t results in a marginal decrease in park use by commerci ils> and possible employees. The need for pedestrian circu_ and from the commercial land use with the PD still e.%>i=a s~.s 4 l w existing trail location along the south side of would still effectively serve the PD and the shopping center land use. The Commission may consider an internal trail link which would lie along the planned developments south boundary between the multi/single family development, tying from Denmark Avenue to the Widgeon Way Trail. This trail link could be desined to prov`_d~ a greenway which buffers and provides transition: t _i-or, the h~ jlh~=J intensity commercial shopping center to the reside n _i =.l I nd u.,E:. The trail would r+ ii' a shorter distance from Ridge apartments to O'Lear, 1~~. The internal trail would be l effective for inte of users within the PD circulating to the park and the ther cm- mercial businesses. (See Figure A) 2 FOR COM -1 7"M ACTION The Commis ion may consider the fallowing: 1 . To maintain the approved trail system for PD. 2. To re-- i. he trail trail which runs along ttI) n,.1 the PD from Denmark Avenue to the Widgeon -y x.,w - nvexu~ e, r i } VF- 3k i lots _ g . t a i Cl) 57 l ~wY a s } P" 4 ' ft•J,~t ~ r..~ _ we~„~A - - a , 3 i C Cil v° C3 K FA Co a on K ~a ate Q _ - _ - - e Kw, j f `c , A . 4 . - j k, a' ernents Trunk uY Sew --L-.- Project No. 452 Eagan, Minnesota April, 1988 19364 i a € tr Rosene . _I LA, A o late Engineers Architects St. Paul, Minnesota a' Otto G. flonestroo, PE, Keith A. Gorrfnn, FF. Thomas w. Peterson, PE_ Charles A. €rickson Robert W Rowne, PF- Richard W, Foster, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, PE. Leo M. Pawelsky 'J Joseph C_ Andedik, PF Ponaid C. Burgaolt, PE, James R. Maland, PE. Harlan M. Olson Bradford A. Lemberg. PE. Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. Kenneth P. Anderson, PE. Susan M. €beriin Posenp Richard E_ Turner, PE Mark A. Hanson, PE. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark A. Sella James C. Olson, PE. Ted K. Field, PE. Mark R. Rolls, PE. i Glenn R. Cook, PE. Michael T. Rautmann, PE, Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. Thomas E, Noyes, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, PE. Thomas E. Anqus, P.E. Associates Robert G. Schunicht, PE. David O. Loskota, P.E. Noward A. Sanford, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, PE. , Engineers Architects April 4, 1988 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Pond AP-49 & AP-50 Outlet Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 452 Our File No. 49364 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Pond AP--,29 an,d A. Pr f~" sa No. 452. This report covers trunk storm sewer ')~~!-ruction preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. sf Mark A. Hanson MAH:Ii I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta e of Minnesota. 4 'Z Mark A. Hanson Date: April 4, 1988 Reg. No. 14260 r Approved by: Department of Public Works Date: PT49364 2315 West Highway 6 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 612-636-4600 SCOPE: This project provides for constructing a trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond AP-49 and AP-50. Pond AP-50 is located south of Cliff Road and east of Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. Pond AP-49 is located in the unde- veloped portion of Rahn Park west of Rahn Road. The outlet to Pond AP-50 is required because the two existing office buildings which abut its wes- i are subject to flooding due to rising water levels in Pond AP-50. Also - eluded for consideration is redirecting storm water in the Cedar Cliff Addi- tions to Rahn Park to relieve the high water levels that occur in Ponce AP-26. Pond AP-26 is located north of the Cedar Cliff Additions in the dev " )or- tion of Rahn Park. The high water levels in Pond AP-26 will effect the base- ball and softball fields during wet periods. This report is a revision to the same report presented to the Council on August 18, 1987. However, the previous report assumed the outlet to Pond AP-49 would not be constructed and the outlet to Pond AP-50 i ted along Cliff Road and not through Rahn Park as proposed. This repcr_t a4,- sumes the outlet to Pond AP-49 will be constructed and the outlet to Pond AP-50 will be constructed through Rahn Park into Pond AP-49. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineoYj,-, standpoint and is in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: This project provides for constructing a trunk storm sewer outlet t from Pond AP-50 and AP-49 to the south end of Pond AP-25. The pr ono e(_i align- ment is shown, on the attached drawing which provides for const_u cting the trunk storm sewer north from Pond AP-50 through Rahn Park to Pond AP-49. The outlet to Pond AP-49 is to be constructed to the south end of Pond AP-25 and Page 1. RPT49364 connect to the proposed storm sewer in Cliff Lake Galleria. Pond AP-25 is to be developed as part of Cliff Lake Galleria which also includes the construc- tion of its outlet. The outlet pipe for Pond AP-25 will be constru!ted north along Rahn Road ultimately con- netting to an existing 24" star- _ across from Rahn Elementary School. Due to the elevation of the existing storm sewer, the controlled water level in Pond AP-49 will be approximately 874 which is 3' above its natural ground elevation. The Rahn Park alignment is preferred over the previous Cliff Road alignment because it is less costly (approximately $60,000 to $70,000). The cost savings is to less trunk storm sewer pipe and significantly less excavation to construct the pipe (average cuts are 5'-10' deep compared to average cuts of 25' to 35' deep along Cliff Road). Pond AP-50 does receive direct runoff south of Cliff Road. Design c stations for Pond AP-50 assume 18 acres of direct runoff south of Cliff Road will discharge directly to it. The remaining 35 acres will be ponded in the drivers' training facility and the WAYL property. Design considerations for these ponds and AP-50 are as follows: Pond Direct Stoz` O~a'r.r1e~~GZ Description Area atr+~-ft} tu.f*.. sett Pond AP-50B (Drivers' Training 0.5 Center) 12.3 ac. 2.13 Pond AP-50A (Wayl Property) 22.9 ac. 4.71 1.0 41.1ac. 9.2 3.64 Pond AP-50 An alternate is also included which provides for redirecting the existing storm sewer in the Cedar Cliff Additions located west of Rahn Park through Rahn Park ultimately discharging to Pond AP-49. Presently the existing storm sewers in the Cedar Cliff Additions discharge to Pond AP-26 located in the Page 2. RPT49364 developed portion of Rahn Park north of Cedar Cliff. The purpose in redirect- ing the existing storm sewer to Pond AP-49 is that the high water level expe- rienced in Pond AP-26 does impact the existing ballfields. By redirecting 18.4 acres from Cedar Cliff to Pond AP-49, the required storage based on year event is reduced 60% (4.7 acre-feet to 2.2 acre-feet) and the time is reduced 50Z (36 hours to 18 hours). These numbers a 3.1 cubic feet per second outlet for Pond AP-26 and the 8.1 acres located in the north- east corner of the park will remain land locked and not discharge to Pond AP-26. Design consideration for Pond AP-49 not including the including the Cedar Cliff area are listed below: Pond Direct Storage Outflow Description Area nacre-ft) (cu.ft./sec.) Pond AP-49 w/o Cedar cliff 24.6 ac. 14.9 2..12 Pond AP-49 Incl. Cedar Cliff 43.0 ac. 14.9 2.75 The outflow is increased 0.63 cfs if 18.4 acres from Cedar Cliff is in- cluded in the direct drainage area to Pond AP-49. As noted, the storage vol- ume was assumed to be the same (14.9 acre-feet). The storage volume assumes a NWL of 874 and a WL of 886 based on existing contours in the park. EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction -ants will be required from Parcel 011-76 for Pond AP-50 and the storm sewer north from Pond AP-50. Easements ire, also required from the two existing lots in Cedar Cliff if the alternate is constructed. It is assumed easements will not be required in the park. Page 3. RPT49364 Pond Permanent Ten _ ci ary E,'i~ ment Util. Eaq. SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 1.23 ac. 0.21 ac. 0.83 ac. CEDAR CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Lot 11, Block 2 0.03 ac. 0.06 ac. Lot 12, Block 2 0.03 ac. 0.06 ac. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRU-rTTON AREA SE l j4 SECTION 50 CEDA : ,iParcel. 011-76 Lot 1, 2, Block 2 SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Rahn Park (Parcel 012-76) COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A ' at the back of this report. A summary of costs are listed below: Pond AP-50 to AP-49 to South End Pond AP-25 $112,710 Alternate - Existing Storm Sewer in Cedar Cliff to Pond AP-49 $ 31,940 The total estimated project costs includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30Z and include legal, ,IJ'J-:.' ring, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. iA-preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over 15 years at an in- terest rate based on the bond sale financing this project. Page 4. RPT49364 Storm sewer proposed herein is trunk.. Therefore, it is proposed to assess those parcels shown on the attached drawing their trunk area storm sewer as- sessment. TRUNK RATES. Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer Single family $0.056jsq.ft. Commercial/Industrial $0.079fsq.ft. REVENUE SOV!11,G:,'S: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Rr~~ ~:nc~> Trunk (Pond AP-50 to AP-49) $112,710 Trunk Alternate 31,940 Trunk Area Assessment 78-009 TOTAL $144,641 $ 78,009 -$66,641 The anticipated project deficit assuming the alternate is constructed is $66,641 which will be the responsibility of the trunk "ewer fund. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report April. 5, 1988 Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment due with Real Estat Page 5. RPT49364 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE POND AP-49 & AP-50 OUTLET TRUNK STORM SEDER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 452 POND AP-50 TO AP-49 TO SOUTH END POND AP-25 250 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm Sewer @ 20'-30' Jn pl. @$38.00/l.f. $ 9,500 1,650 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm Sesser @0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/i,f. 42,900 6 Each Std. 4'dia. MFi w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 6,000 32 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $611.00/lin.ft. 1 "?0 7 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trasr 50 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 2,a0O LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 200 Sq.yds. Bituminous street repair @ $15.00/sq.yd. 3,000 4.5 Acres Seed w/mulch and fertilizer @$1,500.00/ac. 6,750 600 Lin.ft. Improved pipe foundation @ $2.00/lin.ft. 1,200 1,900 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. --l .L900 Total $ 82,570 +5X Contingencies 41130 86,700 +30Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10 TOTAL $112,720 Page 6. RPT49364 ALTERNATE EXISTING STORM SEWER IN CEDAR CLIFF TO POND AP-49 450 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm Sewer @ $36.00/lin.ft. $26,200 2 Each STd. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/ea. 2,000 1 Each 27" RCP flared end w/trash guard @$800.00/ea. Soo 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 400 1 Each Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00/ea. 500 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $500.00/L.S. 500 50 Sq.yds. Bituminous street repair @ $15.00/sq.yd. 750 500 Sq.yds. Sod @$2.00/sq.yd. 2,000 0.4 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 600 100 Lin.ft. Improved pipe foundation @ $2.00/lin.ft. 200 450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 450 $23,400 +5X Contingencies 1,170 $24,570 +30X Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 7,370 TOTAL $31,940 Page 7. RPT49364 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL POND AP-50 OUTLET TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROTECT NO. 452 A.) TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (sq.ft.) (sc. ft.1 Area Rate/s.f. Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 898,240 Pond 16,000 705,790 $0.056 Street 20Z NE 1/4, SECTION 31 Parcel 010-02 859,040 Street 20Z 687,230 $0.056 381485 TOTAL $78,009 Page 8. RPT49364 a[ xr. RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL v x CLIFF LAKE GALLERiA EX 12°° STORM SEWER POND AP 26 012 - 76 -j RAHN PARK POND l AP-25 Ex. 27" RCP P R 0 P0'~ -7:: STREET 'POND AP-49 C.G. POND 011-76 CEDAR ..J COMM. AP-50 CUFF F- COMM. PK. 79"1 ADD. O 2 CLIFF ROAD CO, RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 SCALE IN FEET r s NE, AN'DL,. - r POND AP-- 49 AP-- 50 ou rL.E`r 0, S. 1N0. Cc no ngineers TRUNK STORM SEWER IMP, S.:' inn. PROJECT NO. 452 D ate: APRIL, 1986 FIG. No. EAGAN, MINNESOTA Cc .49364 0 1000 2000 NC7RTH )CAL'- 1 Fr SET 'v/ r = z d CE U 1-77-7 MARI kP,IIN PROPOSED ! - _ STREET t T 7x t;F DAR .o C;LAI E '/l LPA tiiC1A ' 1 K CLIFF RD. _ .t_ . COIAN C Y L. i- A' ~~.p % PLO z ' ~ _ I1-_ 111 I.11. J_I .I I ( ' , F- ITT- (~T Y~ - - - - t i t AV D v Ul 1111 - TL' STOR SEWER ASf'f ::aP -IT AREA - TRUNI: STORM SEVkR IMP. Consulting ngin , at a> PROJECT NO. 452 St. pnoll, Wno_ EAGAN, MINNESOTA F, 0. Dato; APRlI , 1988 j 9 64 1' FORA DU TO.* ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FRO ; KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: APRIL , 1988 SUBJECT: EAGAN ARBOR DAY Attached for your review is a resolution supporting an r gan Arbor Day with festiviti(- planned for Saturday, Apri? 'IrO. John VonDLinde, Superint I_nt of Parks, will coodL ' the festivities associat d with a tree pl r. activii at Quarry Park. Recently, the National Arbor Day Foundation, a Neb a,'>u based organization, dedicated to encouraging tree care and re- forestation across the country, named Eagan "Tree City U.S.A." This is the first time the City has received this national recognition. Communities qualifing for this C igln ~ _ ' «n o, _ national wide program, dc- b' Foresters. The City had to to qualify for this national ,•,xgnitio..: _ 4 ± 3,avc a City Tree Ordinance, a legal ca governing a c,- -;,-eh` r,,ive urban forestry program, and an observance of Arbor Day. The City will be receiving a flag with the Arbor Day logo and a plaque recognizing Eagan as a "Tree City U.S.A." FOR CO '_T TON TION: To approves the attached resolution 7ups ,orting Eagan ,r1h- Day /bls i C their c i AO"}-q qnd 1 a he )ur th of of state ° )cak of c oc lai )urth an- )f May to be in +.hp Ci+.v n to 21 March ' Mr. err' Sullivan Park r ; : Architect -_f= Eagan 3830 Filat Knol Road Eagan, MN 551-1 Dear Steve: Thank you aAla ,_ng with ,Ge s Friday afternoon. ; you : 'ldg ' f 1 am writing this letter to the Eagan irks and u., s.... ion Commission requesting permission t,3 establish a bluebird trail in the Wescott Station City Par~ bl>L> c.. J.✓ L. r..,.. trail ..4.. consists of pj. as. ` i - f specially cC)r"y ..T''rci,x'_. bluebird houses in suitable habitats. During ...ii.'_' breeding season, the houses must be inspected weekly for parasite intestations, occupancy A species, such t h S I would like permission a place to ten houses in the iscott station. Y 4" i and w` I be 1x1o !r,a u an non}_ v zuur to six, off the _and. The hou~.. .~a ANIor On luebird Society brochure. Oe nec--sary materials and to 7 ~tG~_ 1rS,y t'~~J_f Successful bluebird reproduc -requires regular maintenance, and i will do thGi:Y ~ ~ as ell. There will . be ' no cost he city. if f-t--e velopment. of the park confij- with the hOU2 11 remove or relocate the hu..,, as the The bl-bird it naking a strong comeback in Minnesota, .t. and l ulw~, ' l.y the residents of Eagan to t-:`1~ij.y this beau i.al bird. Thank you for your , iderab . Sincarely, y nor O: T ADVISORY PARKS D R EC' CC -117t FROM: STEVE L V , PAR PLANNER/ L C Z I...- ECT MARCH DATE: 29, 1988 E : I LE JJACKSO PAR - E IC3. (--HOOD MEETING On March 24, 1988 a neighborhood meeting for the development f in ler/Jackson Park was held at the Eagan Municipal Build- In attendance from the Advisory Parks and Recreation C-);:' was: Dick Carroll, Wayne Sames and is1y 11 C1. C it f included Ken Vraa, Steve Sullivan, "41' , Bonnie Blood. Approximately 20 re;____ r. wt° Dick Carroll explained that the purpose of the meeting was to allow the residents the opportunity to oversee and provide input in the design and construction of their neighborhood park. Ken Vraa discussed the existing budget and the parare,"ers of development. He gave a brief history of the park,-F), and the current proposal for MnDot pr) ~t, t'llr " ~ 1,11 Bradley, park planning intern, rev` e conditions covering topography, drai____ , ' climatic conditions and off site influenc_- The meeting was then turned over to the residents who exprc-s_ their observations, concerns and park needs. Their concern, -nd interests were as follows: 1. Preserve significant vegetation and 1 t`_ ;--i the "character" of the existing parkland, i. . ~l?oods, sumac. 2. Preserve existing trees, berm and knoll which protects the neighborhood from Cedar Avenue. Design buffer, i.e., landscape screen, along Cedar Avenue to protect park and neighborhood. 3. Place a buffer between the park and t- Pr~=gyp. northern R-4 parcel providing a transitio., C'1n two land uses. 4. Include a "wooden" playground with an adjacent seating area. . Include a looped trail system for the primary purpose of walking and experiencing the passive and natural areas within the park. . Include skating and sledding 7. Include a small picnic area, i.e. approximately - 3 tables. There were mixed feelings regarding the inclusion of a sun s --ter. 8. Include an informal.1 play 9. Include a single hoop hard court play area. 1. Include a security light. 11. No parking lot should be included. 12. City Staff should evaluate . L_o park, i.e. cross walks, sigi r=, l_ s (f =f Slaters R ?<Z. The meeting concluded with the scheduling of a sec( neighborhood meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1988 at 7:30 lo. _ at the Eagan Municipal Building. At this meeting the r+ :side; s will review park plan alternatives based on 1b comm`-r- (-f the previous meeting. Advisory Parks and Recri.----.)n C. .-Ission members are welcome to attend. SS:cm MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY P& __ND RI I -ON COMMI I- I FROM.* DIRECTOR O PARKS AND RECREATION MEL BAILEY, INTERN DATE: IL , 1988 OOH INFORMATIONAL STUDY ISSUEOO. The purpose of this memo is to bring out some of the major involved in the construction of an aquati- facility. Thi- include the type, effectiveness and the ortunitie s=,_)VJ1C' PAC_', OUND: This report was completed by use of ten recent magi. girt,- journal, articles associated with the field of aquatics ancx and recreation. Also reviewed were statistics by the Divi~J1-o=z of Hazard Analysis of C.P.S.C and reports by the Nati, :aury Information Clearing House to give an indicatic : o: of accidents between modern aquatic facili-i a11e fiuard , __nd other municipal pools; and injury rates between s.. imminc recreational activities. Mel Bailey authored the "study" under the direction of the Director of Parks and Recreation to help the Commission better understand issues relative to "traditional pools" and the "fun" swimming pool being discussed by Staff/Commission. SUMMARY., The major conclusion that can be made is that existing municipal pools and programs simply do not furnish an attracti\ se v`,-e for a majority of today's population. Existing publi- pool nr,e not commonly designed to accommodate the informal, play opportunities desired by today's public. This i : by the falling attendance records for municipal pools. The public wants to get back to the of swimming holp- co1:~::!'1_. that was introduced in the 1930's and 140's when swi: ing was "fun" and pool operators provided a complete family r>I- _ ational experience. Since the 150's public swimming pools nave gotten away from this recreational use and tended to cater to competitive swim users. This can be linked to t.h( 'act only competitive swimming pools had specific design st-a<,, and, thus, dominated public pool deign. Consequ ~t~l;.=, the to a very small group of users. A group too small to allow th pool to operate at even break even levels. Modern swimming facilities offer much more diverse than do "conventional" swimming pool and att3 ,4.t range of users. These new facili'`. desi-- t .<informal water play than formal _hive rrr , ~ t: s such innovations as wave pools, water slides, nc= r:ll>v activity play pools. Perhaps more importantly, newer public water play parks are proven revenue producers, rather than the expensive liabil that most existing municipal pools are now. In summary, declining attend- public pools i nctt IIIt of pools being overlooked by L__ but the 1s being looked over because are found 1 end unattractive, compared to other alternatives. FOR COMMISSION'S T TIt The type of swimming facility t'_at is: -i y -)n repercussions on other ar` cam'-;the decision is to build t U,,_-, t 'Le understood that the swimming facility ,~rould be a°t"1 making venture. Thus, the City, in all probability, be willing to subsidize costs not covered by user fees. 5, i the decision is to build a modern aquatic facility, tb is a greater likelihood of breaking even or even making a pr,-fit. If the swimming pool is profitable, it may provide the opt-.<,rttx ity for the City to help offset costs of other areas or r - _ r f f the community center which would tend to be "'»^n-profits l x.-~ 9%. It is hoped this brief study will bring to 1°, t c° c)f thz r issues that needs to be addressed. Understanding the backgro d should be helpful in formulating a direction to take in matters of the community center - including the fees and cha_g- Staff will be preparing a future report on "fees ar_O Ils it relates to the community center and particularly t?: w 3 -11;a pool. _ ~...4 u a ~a W.' _ -p ppyga'v-rro r °v -,na r4we r erv'rner n. r` nn Q C+ m, 1, t), .V Y i..tiel t , 1 Lod, tui a.he folio in li: uction of _ developed o: A• kating mar ar,H 1 c for i tl r. Ace will r tte kV The < all Co c _ t` ty acq L J?iIC road, 1-- ty . t. 50+ _ ,)ro r t " i salt o ti i a °,hese AND RFrT mTON OP,,,,, . 2. laa t( S a Of tL 'V~vo phase ~ LL _ ro 1m- % )r" of C, each t i i. for ache( s f t C ' be l _ L7 c tree a enfo. , p- an. a > f o: thr- _ Ij i r -E With(- _ !on, the it T i i.l ~0 ANA l `~,nTION CC Imo, i 1 ~~nGCIlE'rst ;r5rial "1 ~1 . I inc' f C -1- c h Ll be maj y L L d r a f d y.. r gip.gi.y ~q p sr . ~a .a_X. v ' t at ] ~.I be ini f ' I ' "o the ul a will -lade field , out, _ c goals, ~i ' 1 a ti _ ar Al TIC , 1 _ c g V t T $ P 'e d r 1 cle;; ,'clip and oversE in o Hill r ll tion Al P _ °tzon construction , f - a n f( Ls fot 1 t r AnV?T-,ORS PARKS Al.- ---------ION A , 19$8 ire ar. Lad t- b cue Ken Vraa, Director of Parka Recreation 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 VIC ELLISON EAOAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE, (612) 454-8100 THOMAS ELAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODOn' WAC"TER Council Mer s T oA r EUGENE` I City Clerk April 4, 1988 Dear Resident: The recent City newsy _ article has ~pc~_> regarding the timing of 3roposed devel _ of Oh which is south of the Fairway Hills - lst Addition. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with some history concerning the park and the tenative time line for the first phase development scheduled for this year. At one time, the City 7'i.ad attempted to anauire up to <:_; - (4 0) acres of what is now°,T ~P°°.e Fairway Wills J lition for poses. However, Derrick Land Co: an. able to enter ILnto separate purchase agreements with individual heirs of the estate of Mr. George Omann, Sr., to purchase this property. This purchase covered approximately fifty-nine (59) acres. One of the parcels, Parcel "F", which was also owned by one of the heirs, remained. This parcel consists of fifteen (1`~) ^ .rr_,s a.ti:' i south of the property purch I °d by Derrick Lam:-3 r ML, : n j i City was eventually able to c-wire it, aftt-v by the City Council and the P~._T. Recreation C The Fairway ills subdivision was first presented to the City in February of 1986, with a request for rezoning and a preliminary plat application. As you may know, the City has an ordinarc<a which requires developers to provide up to ten percent (10Q) of their land for parks purposes, or in this case approximate f...v~ and a half (5 1/2) acres. Typically, the City does not. property for its parks in quantities of less than ten (10) A public hearing for the plat was held on March 25, 1986, by the Advisory Planning Commission. The commission recommended denial of the plat due to roadway access and rezoning. The Advisory Parks Recreation Commission also reviewed it at their April 3rd, Commission meeting. Several park concept plans and alterna- tive plans had been prepared for a possible park within the THE LONE Q TREE THE SYMBOL OF _ . , AND G., W OUR CC -2- development. The situation was complicated due to the fact that the owner of Parcel "F" would not commit to a sal of t., property to either the develop+ ~ or the C' -.y. Th that were reviewed by the Cor i n 1 =ra-- tives, including the fifteen ) ac could be acquired by dedication from r o t =-.1 Addition is a alternative which would provide for a ina ion neighborhood/athletic area, and for "o Park". The Fairway Hills Addition and Park Plan review -speared May lst, Commission Agenda, at a special i of vi ory Commission on May 15th g nd agaii in Jun z Commission meeting. In th_ roClress v. way of negotiations for Pay ct i a_~~ ~ a PUL had not been signed at the tim-, it that j ild be successful in acquiring this prof ~ rty, allowing ,,l n-; _'c a park to be completed. Derrick Land Company had several concc-:°ns relative to the p< design, and subsequently a preferred concept plan for 1 neighborhood/soccer field layoat wa r- .'.n la 1986. The preliminary plat and -o the Advisory Parks Recreation c 1,"i l 11 1 _L Gy u p- proved park plan provided for an xchz__..g of b,prc cat :l- five (5) acres of property with Derrick Land Company; thi provided an efficient and workable park, steet, and plat plan. The park plan met the objectives of providing for typical neighborhood parks services, as well as the need for soccer space, and the developer's concerns relative to parks evelopmen`. Furt ir, concerns expressed by residents in the i'_i_ 1,2t on also taken into cone _L, on in world P rl 1 plan will provide for open play space, pl-xy, 4, ~ (j, court (basketball), trail, and a backstop. L__nd benches and picnic tables are also included. Fairway Hills - 2nd Addition - is now proceeding. Cons-q., the land exchange can take place and the development of t- can now proceed. At this time, the City i Ting the . d qrad plan and contract speciii,_-' ions for tht .r 1 C -,n ~ proved plans. It is anticipated that a contra4 : 11 I this park in mid-May, with construction to comment in dun . e contract will include the first phase development which is primarily grading, seeding, utilities, trails, and lot construction. The second phase development l s,J _z ,-,,_lop- ment and will begin in 1989. Phase Two develr c upon successful completion of Phase Onc,, and '-sin-1.1 =g availability. 2 -3- The City appreci-tt -s t' nsirhbc-1--^d i- -rest i E ? i the r r developed. The _ 4J of t kddit a , { n(3 the a to the west o Fay m y mills, ve i looking f and to t?°e park for a number of years. In the meantime, we appreciate your patience and hope that you will enjoy other Eagan parks which are located nearby. A..>E Vra Director of Parks & Recreation fls cc: Eagan City Council Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission Tom Hedges, City Administrator 3 Ell Decision Resources Ltd. EXECUTIVE SLWIM"W This summary overviews the results of a telephone survey of 404 randomly selected residents of the City of Fac ar). :._"Urvev responses were gathered on January 14, 1988 and E~etw.>t:, r,~,arY 19 and 21, 1988. The average interview took tt"F,;;+,y ue minutes. All respondents interviewed in this study w,- e part: of a randomly generated sample of the city. In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of Eagan residents within + 5.0 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases. Eagan is a fast-growing, young, relatively af-} hi t collar community. It is fairly homogerF-~o;-i,,, er_r_E~pt for the distinct differences between home owners and reoters. this latter group will also exhibit a much greater degree of transience in their plans for the future. As a result, although the city will slowly age over time, it will continue to possess a very young population segment. The large number of households containing young children will clearly have an impact on city service demands. As will bce shown later in this analysis, residents place a very high value on park and recreational facilities. And, there is some worry that community growth will not be balanced against environmental needs. Livability issues, then, can be expected to dominate policy debates for the next few years. In this stage of the city "life cycle," communications with residents must be a top priority, even though transience will somewhat complicate it. In many fast growing areas, a feeling of alienation can quickly develop because of the changing nature of the environment. Communication, then, is the only means for mitigating its impact. Since many residents share similar age, occupational, and educational characteristics, a consensus on most issues will be readily creatable if information is provided in a timely fashion. In comparison to many other suburban areas, the demographic changes facing Eagan place it in its own class. Declining ~,_hool populations, tax bases, or residential aging are defi?nitely not problems the city will need to tackle for many years. During the next decade, Eagan will have a very rare opportunity for Metropolitan Area suburbs; the ability to carefully plan for the future as the key population center of the third ring suburbs. Eagan residents rate the quality of life in their city 31228 Dean Court 9 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55 1.16 0 (612) 920-0337 extremely high. They take pride in Their ~tf~t~rh~ta Lnd are generally satisfied with the way thin-;;I-; ,-Ire cu-rently .,(:"ing. I ~ there is a lurking problem, it is the future: can Fiq,+n "suburbanize" without losing its exurban ambience? Answering this questions will be key to the continued vitality of the community. Overall, Eagan has one a good job in handlini i' Cp i 1 growth. But, as more \,o!,,ng- families move int;:, c t y , residential needs will ch ,_x r ~ciably. Citiz want to preserve open space elop more ameniti is also a concern about city v nd the ability ' ;J~ict with the influx of new residents. "Quality growth," there, the by-words of the future. tar;,,1ting development in sc._h a aaa„ as to preserve a natural environment for recreation and to avoid an undue drain on the quality of city services. Residents place a high value on rr t rt a.", lr , activities. Although interests are varied, >nc J ,>><<_. some type of sport or outdoor leisure oppor', ~,~n' _y. E~ z .terns -,f participation are consistent with the "wellness" emphasis seen across the nation. But, the dominance of' young families adds a twist toward group activities rather than individual endeavors. As a result, non-team sports activities are as important as league or organized activities. Since the general environment of Eagan was found to be a positive characteristic of the city, it is not surprising that most residents take advantage of recreational opportunities. The Parks and Recreation Department was c F- .lly rated very highly by Eagan citizens. Both programming and facilities were awarded solid grades. Satisfaction with maintenance and upkeep was also the rule. If there is discontent, it lies in the feeling that the park system should be further developed. But, on the major issues facing the Department, citizens were very content. For Department planning purposes, n(,w, vk_r, several issues emerged. The level of information about recreatio n31 opportunities should be heightened; one strategy might be the better targeting of news to renters. Sand volleyball courts, tennis courts, archery ranges, and horseshoe courts should be considered for future construction projects. The issue of an ice arena should be considered in the near future; however, it should be di- cussed within the context of an "ice arena" r,!: ie, th iln i "hockry arena." Finally, if Parkview and Carriage H111 Gclif Course are sold, the city should move to acquire and maintain operations at both facilities. This agenda represents a very pro-active positioning. But, the study conclusively shows that citizens desire and would support an aggressive development and expansion of the Eagan Park System. Eagan residents are not dogmatically anti-t . They de,mon strate a prudence which permits tax incr for certain expenditures. By and large, city services are vN Ll-received. As 2 a results most citizens will accept a tax increase to keep services at their current levels. But, there i some miscommunication about the extent of city taxes; many residents overestimate the city share of property taxes, while even more had no idea about their percentage. Communications on this point might not only increase the reservoir of good ,,,;I1 1,-E_ydy existing toward the City, but would also set the iJ funding requests. A majority of residents rated each city service tested in the study as satisfactory. However, city street repair and maintenance has the potential of becoming a major issue 1-it th future. Snow plowing and drainage/flood control also n=t ' ;reappraisal and monitoring. But, overall, for a fast suburb, the city has dome a remarkable job of keeping psi:-, development. Development is, in fact, the key concern of most resir'er,i-s. They are interested in attracting certain kinds of facilitie-I residential and retail are given high priorities. Citizen= also indicated they would be more careful in zoning and pl<ai-ining procedures if they were member- of the City Council. k4to gr l',th sentiment is almost non-existent.; careful, quality gravtii;h ~s t,hu direction sought by most resicf~', 7t~--,. Eagan residents share many issue orientations with ott:Er Metropolitan Area communities. A plurality would support furthe=r restrictions on snowmobiling within the city optimally confined to certain trails and areas. A plurality oppose the acquisition of an arts garden and also can see no reason for the City to supplement current areawide cultural offerings. One project for possible consideration, though, might hL- a local playhouse, since threshold support existed for such facility. But, in general, Eagan residents have a very clear or,ct of the types of things the City should and should not do, p<irticularly in recreational activities planning. The level of information about city government is relatively high, conversely, actual contact with one manifestation of the City, its staff, is relatively low. The staff, howv,,t-=r, did receive both strong positive and negative evaluation-. The latter came, curiously, from people having little or no rrriEact with city employees. There is a troubling divergence-, between the reality of staff effectiveness and its second_ify reputation. For a developing community, Eagan lacks many of the proble-ms evident in other communities. There appears to b~ a b~ruc:d consensus in place on most issues. Services are t.,P l l r l-I r e s. Contact with city employee,; is generally for the future, then, i s the coati nun i !-t ~f th Things are going well; Hic, ,_~y is to keep them g i in the direction. There is an excellent likelihood that the voters of Eagan will support the construction and partial operation of a Community Recreation Center. Ideally, the facility proposal should contain the following points: 1. An indoor swimming pool. 2. Ice skating rink and gymn<_~__,ium. 3. Average property tax incru_ase no greater than $67. 4. Additional facilities carefully selected to reflect community preferences and the tax hike ceiling. . A large community room, clearly publicized as a revenue generator. If the proposal were to follow these parameters, the chances of success at the polls would be maximized. Although the support of athletic association~_> will be critical to the success of the referendum, planners MUS;t bear _n mind that most citizens desire access to th -F=.cilitic~, fi-+r fr,- style activities. Hence, it wi 11 be ni c ry to c i cr from the outset that multiple rR are t~ i~kg pool and ice rink. Although prop--!ably not i ~!;-iii-ti ~Ll tf f_~ it e rink, the design of the swimming pool must be or ionted tovii rd t ami ly and individual use. Eagan residents show the highest level of support for a community recreation center that the researchers have found in the suburbs. However, turnout will be critical. R-,,,-,h a low turnout dominated by opponents or a high turnout domirxl- tt_d try the uninformed could reverse citywide sentiment at t1-t_, polls. Consequently, an aggressive informational and voter identifica- tion effort will be needed to insure success. Communications with residents are good in comparison with other fast growing communities, but they could be improved. In fact, action should be taken now in order to insure that cotdi_ tions do not deteriorate to a critical condition. Thrrr 3rE a number of deficiencies in the communications system 4 Lic?~Ecy,xe some remedial attention. Residents are using an extensive mix of devices to gain knowledge about city activities, in general, and recreationdl opportunities, in particular. The Park and Recreation Department needs to prioritize a couple of major communications vehicles and rely upon them. Of course, once the choices have been made, publicity will be needed to alert the citizenry. Since residents are already dependent upon the "Eagan Chronirl-" to 1~ large extent, city communications Duld primarily dEtpt_r~d '~r) it that source. Cable television al / has a wide views,-ship, so the City may also wish to consider upgrading its program offerings and productions. By building upon existing strengths and priori- tizing communications vehicles, Eagan could very rapidly develop an efficient system during its high growth period. At the same time, decisions need to be made about r c, 4 renters. By their transient nature, the problem of reach ni; of these people will be complicated; but, the Uit ' ,,.-ian cc>>~ild be doing a better job in integrating them into tr C, at ions network. Both the "Eagan Chronicle" and the should evaluate their current delivery systems at apartment buildings. A further possibility might be the establishment of regular well- publicized City Council sessions in areas near or clo: Lo the apartment buildings. Unlike many other suburbs with high rr;)- portions of renters, Eagan renters are not derr" 1„ - gal ly different or irrevocably alienated from the community: tt~F_ ~ti; chore facing the City is establishing contact r ,jai-3 r_ t~~,.n ameliorating differences. For the fastest growing community in the Twin Cities , Eagan citizens show an astonishingly high degree of contentm7it with the city. Normally, growth brings with it concerns about fundamental changes in the lifestyle of the commuri!.y. Quite the contrary, Eagan residents look n r° toward the ep>::~~tunities associated with "quality growth" he pitfalls ization." They feel that city offi "als will make th=, c-orrect judgments in the future to keep things on course. They are confident that a balance can be struck between business and residential growth, on the one hand, and the natural ambience of the area, on the other. It is this consensus on the quality of life, appearing while the rapid growth phase of the city takes place, which makes Eagan both unique and remarkable in c.nr?tCr icon to other communities. 5 MEMORANDUM FROM: __L ® IR C Oy® OF -ARKS & RECREATION APRIL , 1988 DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Plans are set for the May 14th, "Batter Up", yout.. baseball, strtional program. Rob Fornasiere, A istant r .°,n _vF, of M'_nnesota Baseball Team, wil3 ccndL boy and girls, plus --vide a Mir ota baseball 11 e wil i.r pic is lunch will v ed a rime: v _ l I momento for each particip int. The progr will be con,! Rahn Athletic Fields from 10:00 A.M. to 1:.s0 P.M., on Mai The registration for adult softball is virtually completed. The department has registered twenty-nine (2") women' ill teams, eighty (80) men's recreation t ar..' ,t (28) men's industrial teams. P rt~j ~ t seven (7), eighty _ °t (18) and two tion, the City expects eleven (11) w tiring fo 35/And Over League. The total number of team! --egistered to a comes to one hundred/forty eight (148). CG-recreational _ is have not been registered as yet, although twenty (20) tea are anticipated. This would bring the grand total of softball _rs to one hundred/ s ixty-e ight (168) compared to or, r f - five (135) in 19"7. Ti program _rs now rez_ .1 ' :x r 4, f s y on Tuesday, Wedr day, a-- Thursd a- -hts. i able to enter l t until O,tional Y provided for on TL ednesday • .::1 Thursday. NEW I"T " The de rtment is fortunate to have Bonnie Blom, an it graduate student from the University of inneso' , 1 e this spring. She has alre<)dv wo7ked v ith 1 he egg decorating activity, and T-Till 1,n tional programs. Bonnie will t iI-,vcviI g the trail systems usage. icurs '-,,y lc~~ : f1 j it a -;,-,r ing activity, including a possibl new offering "The Mayor's Fishing Opener". 1 The :-ing y -ograms have .begun. "Landscape Your r has required the addition of a second section, due to ai o er- whelming enrollment. GI TI Registratio~t A CAI Association h` now 1K)een coy <1 11 consist of fourteen (14) mini c.tid zquirt. fiv ~ f h grade teams, two (2) 7th/8th grade teams, two (2) e.L0 a and one (1) junior travel team. In addition, baseball show thirty-two (32) mite and squirt teams, ten (10) nai ,c,I'sa 6 ma j or- , and thrc e 3 7r. n 's. They Ea a--. '_t' 1 ~t.i_ will Al--o hive or,, t am ea lfl from t' 1.3, the ac , t r It has not r c To .o'_nt - -::iation yet tor C_ f I c, 1 i ais ~ti L. u itch they will also have a YL c v+ 'h i.xl program. S`a_f s very concerned about the availability space for these youth groups, unless they are willing to begin using Fridays, week-ends/or scheduling two games per field/per day. 'h c p: "_rc =~t is planning to conduct a irie_~ area this coming spring. The deparM(nn ~ ~ l ic, ? z p,,,°-airie burn as a means of managing vi 3 o reduce the encroachment of undesirable weed species. TI burn was conducted in the Spring of 1986. The burn is c - tional based o a number of variables including wind,- ture, moisture content, etc. I_ 3 vhn Von eLinde recently completed an e tention courses rom In- diana University, which was a two year program. Th.',. Fxecutive Development Program was also sponsored by the National_ R(-_-(;r - tional & Park Association, and is considered one of the° educational programs for directors and parks & patio c- Pl in the country. ® r~P Clean up from winter activities has begun at all park --d preparation for the upcoming spring and summer monthE _W begun. The department has started the litter pick-up it that are not yet too wet, and hope to begin field work withi -Ez_,e next week. 2 The installation of playground equipment has been ; .-_:-Iulec Lakeside Park. Conditions are still somewhat wet, Jut petted that with the drying weather the departmen t begin late this week, or beginning April 11th. Th-° 'r--ing prr-r-mss Fit_ & Fun A,--1 inc> -~-,ased from t. p r, -viou ire,,- ons. Special events and trips were held during the r r break. Events at the Omni Theatre, followed by a r -1 party, jointly sponsored by Lakeville, Apple Valle,,, and Eagan Parks Recreation Department. Thursday of-'-- --,n - ~ _ nrw Center vies i- - sixty (60) pare it. n" chi.i_' ~-n 'tending `i- L An egg decorating/ coloring contest was held on Fri w _ h 17 proximately one hundred/twenty-five (125) children ,.r r~ The morning session was held at the Rahn Park built , f- ternoon session was held at Goat Hill Park. A visi t:xac% "Easter Bunny" and 11 live rabbits 'xic s of Applications are r. °r i--g accepted for r a I programs until April 15t`i. Interviews will er,a' _i h( llowir7 week, with hopes of a full summer staff by the third in May. It appears that a large number of staff will return from last summer. Plans are being geared up for the E .,,q n Tun Ru at Trapp Farm Park. The Volleyball will be finished at the end o There are sixteen (16) teams will be participating ir; 1-s x- teen week session. /bls CITY fJ ! <'':G Q ,3.,+i.1a, ECT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT _.EZO N..._G, PRELIMINARY r='1. (COUNTRY HOLLOW D ADD) APPLICANT: PROGRESS LAND CC) LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 23 i ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARINGs FEBRUARY 25, 190:1 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY a, 19S8 °31..,rxNNIi`,G AND i'.,NGl.asEE.,I.:'lG LuPAl TMa.,;'kTS REPi.~a}a,.,t.; .ia.z BY: APPLICATIONS: sap3ratn "PPIWIKOWS have wpn - AS (anriculwral-) acras no in R- I , lainnie-Chily) a - , of Cou.:, ` o.2.< j.~ ..~~.t - `-.i.3i~ u! 'vim-.C1 1..~,3ti n~_ firs: _ a-~. _i. i"t ' - ` - r of I_ ...-,...,h.,,. r ,_bdr'._si-.;.a1. ',)-6 :.iix'1_ _ r_ and '3 r ,_AP'! lAlo_ _nc. ,d EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE LAN4 This > A L I is C.;. o.. , , . by , i - Place Addition no Lae east, ind the 9101 prqvioasly trees :Z Located _,.b_o A {h.o, 7..h _>it, .i.Itd ths area to coo souli-I is open croplano. The sit2 falls jrnm6tically jcver 40 feet) from the Clarkson area to the p_-:d n oar the northwest portion ot L he c_.. U a i n nr_,' with lr previous :.~a. ~ i.. i.- iL)Y` Tho Y 1 S.'.prymot.. . layout -ties .''1-_~. m Prairie cthis East ef3- ~.~..).~E.~ ~.L_ti. the .ru~''z~:_Er_Tri portion of .~.~?.~b plat Countryside ano Drive becamns - throuqh The ~.i.: lots vary :3.i. size from 12,000 sq-..,. i ' feet 33,100 squt _ largar ones are due to ponding easements. All lots meet or exceed tne 85-foot minimum width at Lbe setba&k Hnn. No Variances have been requemed. s s, 'N G r e Storm Sower Plan. - n t no nno Sion and o , - Lhe t , t .,w ' , , i " n maximum critari- Erow n, L - M slopes, 1 v- C ] L: y 1 - 7 raj -ice n u y_ n [Aa 21 i . T ) - pond Nhich will i H h I a' ev - to The -alp;- _ L Rr ponds annu located to northeast, the nutsid2 - - r storm sower nat h pond must 2 O OMB. no pro~, e „_VA. ay E_,.aE.z-~e volumes. iii i,, r_ i2 a- t _ r_,. saver whim v v t ..v _ . r t y T port We 01 J l ._.k 2. , i . _ ,1 .;1 v 7l r _ __e as a - , U - the ' l ' m for Pond ' was inL . ! (-2 _ _ A QL _ . a « .1 Pond W-26.3 Pond W-26.3 is undeveloped and iocatel r., c. a -?s„ Tl o ice. pond P _ 6m is (._hrJ -iik an xi,,... Lii storm sC_s3eY system '4l t,i in the 1st. Addition to Ponds the proposed development does not Wcorpor.a-t~, ti-,e ...and in whic-i-, pond M-26.3 _ _ _ _ „tis located. the _'r. 3L _C o_, p,~___ ,.5 most L~_,_I;ecT Presentty no overland Araivane is propasel bmwoen pond M-25 and pond jV-26.3. . i'__, _Ll ~ , aC phosphorus eKport from the 13.3 ,c.. .z Country ao__ ' `%-w 2nd AdAition devolopmenn is estimated to he 9 pounds per year. development, h'a ha .tom expart ~ e L. _ c_ --?s - _ i - - p o u p, e. a on it pCs gra , ; _ an, r :tin a! L site runoff into Pond , results i-7 no awliti-onal phosphorus export from the site. on it Portion ad v4W er must we _ 1< _ A W-13.3. _ pt _h_" _ _s e wC. "mss _onn !P-25 an A 1 . . , nue zn the -2t } s 10" in diameter. in 3" Line in rho oroposed _n must ne be street will ' an tp'. - -.ter _i v v L op o,_ 1_c ,.e s _ ii _ .t, Addition. 01--, e 1,,-) o ln, q t e r,,- j) o s e a 6 w a c to r in a in vv i, 1 1 1) o n T r _ S z ~ - 0 11 L 1v _s. al" -Jic„ Two outlets are ;-JY f' po:-, "!~1 in the snr."hei. `t_cr and 1v v; _ A 11 _~a.i., ? :_sr need for temporary ci.iu _A aL' construction. The ext2nston of the proposed north ' /south street riaht-of-way to its t e£.1..i. -it. ":i1 time. northerly and snu ';].:_'..C'.-`✓ boundaries 6vI s ~ + J Aitoor the cons- Y . e_ ? on of the proposon ( Ce._t the s _ . a_. e on u_ _.o?, I r ?C inn, [_''.-)r i:?x ate street tf `b_ pond :ci v tientsf -nd _E .-b a< e;:~_s for ~_I,ose, :ice. ~.~i_Ac -;--)_i ies ct__._,t a.._teC.i. Ou t of Lhe 7y sonl It >J- i _ z 'y. >v s is _ to _z, Proporthes. rega laLorv agency appropriate assessments anv Levied _ hh-l"Ger Projoct No. 505: Sanitary Sewer Trunk QW.3001acre 19M acros y'25,94,-, Storm Sower Trunk .053.1st 369,456 sf 46,081, TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMEN'll' $72,029 in accordance with special assessment policies in aftccu it this .._e nc' - . is o' Li(Y, Mat DESCRIPTION _ r ai d u. 05 Water Trunk e 11.09 c 04,583, TOTAL PROPOSED Aa? sEe.3 SMEi_4i 11' $14,5M n : final assessment - _ calculated ~ J MseA nn L q, c_ - -S and dimensions - - .of the _ ii Sn_ 1^ t 1.dll ~ d , _ rd_.. I . iv c,~ with the rntes in effect at the Lime of Me jinal pLat 3pyrovaiCONDITIONS: COUNTRY 1MM&W 2ND AMITIM,4 These standard conditions o'L of plat approval as Wool_ _d by _ou?.__, l l :1C".. ! on CII Son! :..kip';' 15, 1997 j ~ ix- C ?i?pi t c'd 4d . t h Al a Mg 3 p M g Mg i.._!p C 6 F E_%1p 1r Md fl-.,-, storm sewer PMPOsed in the ncrtheasterly pnrtton of the size is raquirad to be directea 10 OhO pnod in the NW cornet: of Block 2. {-1 ri i ~a Street t-~h ~ r.,f r✓f=LY -1A~i ~ oreeL L u C Ji :1i- is required the plat boundaries. STANDARD "u CONDITIONS OF ~ ig APPROVAL; A. Assessments l a A' its a L 1 + v - vi_1 .1, t ° p with i _ M t__ saw 1 Aedicato _ Ara maao w uni !I i Lo privaLe property or public riqht-or-way. 2. This aevelopment shall Radicate, provide, or financially quarancFe - costs 0! additional raLA _a nndi __S.j aka 1 - t - , outside of aonicano! nablin right-of-way as nocessarv to e , a _h sv c:!cj en- m _ 3. This Kveicpmanr shall dedicat- all. nubLic right-of-way a temporary Mope 'e casements for -.-1 .ev . Me it j0isdictionaL agency. - a This ac_~..~;. , i;? ei't shall c. ei7 C ar - C 5 r .a a naqe IU,,. ponding easements to incorporate the required high water ° nlovaticn necessiLated by City storm requirements. C. 9 Plans and Sp cUicati<. n a_;ia , t erM Professional engineer , in i C` co.. - a ? a cE . with City 7 - an,] - p a"v° c by staff prior to final plat r, V a_ 2 n _ grading. drainage, erosion, and smliment control 1r-- - be - current City stanjards and apprDved 5y staff yrior to final plat approval, development 3. This shall insure that all temporary dead u. I a" streets shall have a cuL--de--sac constructed in accordance 1 City en 1_ o _ _ -,..s s a ~ 9 e .-2 1 l e' C_z La i A l>.sc.. p_? i?" plan shall ho s+ 1.. _z on the e proposed q plan a n3 cl,pr'ov'c_'li Jtz prior to the final plat zstJFir v J:a i a The financial X51 a 0 be included in the De c:a '1,.-_.i4 a, '_i „^i_ r. .t oa:,ecz unnil one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PEAT APPROVAL PAGE T1:10 -e l, Y k- 'J, _ 7 _ _ r- ~ E _ ~ L _ ~1 a in D. Public WDrovements AR if any public improvements _r_:. to be n ta' ed under A City _ 1 _ , bv Council action orior 2. Permit,3 development 1 1 acquisivion a 1. e - h F. Parks Dedication if T-.Ax 1 n > as um me ~ n i+. G.r _._iTt ti,sw_n a approved i Council _il.:t_o__u G. 0-ther, o r - - "te'd - Approved; Council action. Advisory Planninq Commission, City Council r" 15, 1987 Revwscd L S#2 J S TA\ F° A oft t i 4200 r-z t .g { i i 1 ~~tt Ohi }Uhp Mp t• !y ~r4v ~f.ltt t t~ d - I a D4 28 d x 5 9 9 CIRCLE "A"' a B u x ~ ~ R m ~J m a o n IJ o 0 a I: ti a a PRAIRIE CIR. E, _ Q ~ x b ~ IV o a ~ A - f, O > 4 car:- rt ~ a as @~ 559 a ~,a Jg~ 'PY S;~ i V . rtf I.,AO 1 +2•~3 ~ ~ a N O >a71 COUNTRYSIDE n OPIVE, - f3Lo a -Tj f+t ~ 22 047,98 N84. 0508"E Z 12 a 2 ~ rq ~ A ;IS Za' p ffi CSA.H. 140. 30 (DIFFI.EY RD.) ° n 89°9508• E X0428 i N 84• 04 a• w .n.~... /Jen ~ GAC. 1 f Off, / Gt RCL U +4 1, KS Cn ~ i ! R1 A t ~ Ii w a ! w ~ fit! ! w 1 Lx N m R - ,a COUN flySID,E vc Tr- o BL0R `14 X7}1 x ~ fTi pp ~ N ~ p y ~ ppA r' ~ ®S ~ w ,i ! f t i n C m la 59793 N e9°5SE Z I ~ ? a v S II ! R f Iy r } CS A H No 30 ( DIFFLEY RD ) f 5 e v ea 08, E lilt r PRAIRIES CIR. A E. r 0 n ~ ro o r ~i ~ 1 r3ez C ALfeouv ;ISIt -AA B L C- 59193 a -N 83'3508"E r { s _ r S A H C ^ 4 \ , 8-!5 ce"E I ~ _ ' ~`~°~•.'.':'.':':•:'.';':'j CIRCLE 'A' c .c PRAIRIE CIR. m r 4. I 5t X-X ~m yam, COUNTRYSIDE m 8 ~ ~ .ate " e. ~qt 93 j G7 1 x LF a TTE R a C (fit A 1 N- C.5 A_H. NO. 30 4 OIFFLEY R0.1 ~ 5 64'35 '68'E Cx n W l'8._I 1 111 503/670 f ACC 1 mkw • .n. 504/67,0 .r-asanmamtamt Yllap IIF+'h.~f' 1 2" W 1 a Imo,) 38.4/56.0 0~11~ _ 16„ 'm dwo 1?Y ~ ' 119 54.6/71.0 12- 16" (L IIQ 53.1/68.0 z 503/678 .i aa~ mmia anm arm a.:w mrmt arr, i I7 53.7/ 72 0 ' 23- mss. , .00 -4 /760 17f? 51.4165.0 l 18 4/ 2 9.0 1 i t mot' .0 F~az?K i~ ~ 6 MG. GROUND 5T0RAGE ~ 12 I 1. 5000 GPM. BOOSTER W_L. Ia59t. 'may,\ 186 .t 2.2158 24„ W "a { It a •,?Fi~80/820 'O1 F 13 7 a<Il54n f arws w+as.>p r~ ~,m ~.~ae ~-uw,~a - _'~r.~~ ,a try Mri. +I~► ~~►'~'i.. s '4 ~-~a I 355150.0 ,1 t 12" 68.7/74.0 85.2/95. 860/9 a 74.4/62.0 1 Y I 1 94 5/ 9 5 0 20" --r w a oem aw i ~'""^w 2CX) 70.8!76.($- 'Ti -6" - ~ . 1A ~12" „ i/58.0 ;i '03)433/580 0 I 476, S> 74.6(870 °.5/63.0 506/66.0 93 7/1040 a~~^:i €r t v:=gyp 1~~ ® v - ' - ~ 1G t, t a ( ~S z IJ ~~c r 91.1 ~ _ i C" 8 I~40 8 95 .0 12' x 740 20fi . 205 20° ~ a ( ) - ?AGE ( 76 81'0 94.7/100,0 ER 1}1 r I I % E DAKOTA j (710 , - 11 112" 12" S ; ~L PA R "I FIG. city of a approved v standarc WATER 4: PUBLIC plate ARKS MASTER PLAN 1 DEPART MEN CITY OF E BPS. G. AN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CRYSTAL PONDS ADDITION APPLICANT: ASP CONSTRUCTION CO. LOCATION: NE 1/4, SECTION 12 EXISTING ZONING: F-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC REAHING: MARCH 24, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1988 REPOSTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS A, r1._.rJ_L(__aSx Af,- apn:.l_..a ,.,ter has Ken „-i,,,ed 1_<° ? ~r?KQ.,.rV .a, . ap Crystal do AAK~Wn C F"1' is 131 Pentil ? 'Q i.. .•L.. n Ans t,.s rl,_.., area .-11 ! R_ s1 d'?,el _a~, 0.6 rnv.,/a... r A r r» p nn,,o Wi.. neq LC - ,.erc -v-- to gib ,_t)J i ' ' is .r _<<< i~'Lo J::i1•)'LI'7,>r ,..tts to the ..3,~T;,, Currently, i..ae site . primarily Jpet"1 a, s axenou fDp .some ja wt.,,_ d glee laou ...-__s. 1 arw thhckes~ al Dnl-> SITE PLAN: Aae ne, _p 3;i o itT.. .nom serves ,-_y K Q, 3 _tin two _,A , We two 0e ._.d a1' also constructed ti Royal Oaks Anurtments along We west side W „dE.r', a. Drive. ElA l_: ;)rtJpJ`,eCi _!et ng Ls nob 0e same style. ?1 are , Apartments where ._i t:"1__, 1dc a ,~Y'1 sr;z i_ I'_fv ___x b.. _l. 7 proponod: 10 , r wiLl occur W rour piases working hack Cram the pond irea towirds t5e west anl south. Post nA .s will h av"a direct i._G s from tKa garage. Vin y aiding 00 or ~..`_t a r color is proposed. Amenities ..Z1 e.f:~ _ e ~,tces Ln some iltl_,_T„s~ L to s _ %1 _I L'o pool an a f~:?:__ e. ion iii 1 _ _nS _ t foot i chain link fence 1 J d aioHa the souviern property line but not aLong We east o west Lines. M„ r L., n i , n t t, i-en tit. 1 ,,ic cutting Woutt the yards to the nou& in order W Cot ta Dar WK Park. Staff - requessej 0V sections he jr ?Jn showing r_._ h-:1 tie homes to Ylc' .a, 2. .s :'JA ! _ „ie , =i .t. _ =11n_ still ~Ain! be pr o ,rye,-: : - P--~ - - rm - _ , ° m _ , Y. i,.l _ - ,.emu,. V is _"s ban-, t' a n ^,r, , ' nL xt r areas , 4 ;n ,?d , a NA EROS .O'garCONTROL: . } - v :i 6 to 1 - r' ^ m - - Storm Sower _ - Man cal Ls ~ f _ Aiah , dL elevation , ' sE_ 155. Acco7ding to the pridinq pLaa submittal, tie - " r ; „ - low point in MILO Highwal 053 is at in opproximan'2 - - , of . 1 S°;~i_ a _~:~,:er ~ Chan the proposed LLB`,. o _ ,C`~. _ J_~z of .tee. W-3, it . ' , 1 - " - Storm Sewer rPlaa , 7 PoW GP-2 ! GP-3 01 acr~ kn~t. The _ volume between the Q.1. ,tA i d _c We L of :7=-.l4m -_,_,.a _3 _ op:"l 3,,e hilh a or love! of 114 Provides m;~ ~__.tDraqe. Based on the assumption that the 305 ncrcs which are r trioutacy to r GP-2 , P residential. tho existing storane volume of 74 acre Wet is C1 ..at_, rJcro _3r7 ' aai W-1 cannot be allowed. Cut and __ill a1. as on _ e _amu=. jor 1,. the site z .o _.__Li a f7 :.l of rk approximately Not in the nocthwestarly corner to cut areas , it abouL 'v a L; i a d the central portion of the site. Graded si. . ..,s L.iJ. ; o!eqh.: ut this :a site I':' required to Q W0 he .'?:ax1mu111 The o+ m n proposas VD v _ _ A_ an internal storm .`J E. 4x7 a<. system _r. Ad convey this runoff to P Cl GP-3. Pond J=''°'..: is intended to receive tir"cI. runoff from this aw ,_a.a The Preliminary ; ra_ 6_lq M:_zn doe _„QY a._a-_ ! ci, f_ eiy '_'s.a--1 nc. r~'~ ti.., .;.i12: e.nr properties. The Development is r.i:a <''A. ti.~ ;w E'i1d c: storm sewer stud to Us r( es _ yr property line to _J ,c v e the adjacew property. , ~ _ _ . . < . _ _ _ ~ . _ _ ~ _ . Uzi Sediment ...r P l a n -ry ....1 y.. rVVIOW. . - ~anoyl _ l i 'r Y j T } A wnr3r . Y TO i13 iWOW ilanq Sn _ S. r 4:i w, O& A `_'r C" n1 sufficient p"', _ .-'J a.1a prns`-wr_. v reVVIV . . a State _Fw,. The "vn . o n_. ;op - in WAtnr nal. 1147 10 thynaah t at-, S T j ! J MP R Z Y skcnet _ _ zD this Ana 0, a h' a.. l a , _ _ . , P! _ I _ a Ana lo a n _ nn O V o stato i t r. i .J a t _ a o 3 _a v i ..i e~_ k~_ proposes -,J _i._. .A~.aw >p_. e~_ .._...c~A _.~tLi o-rl _ i o~ of - _ r1 d'a te _ C_r_~~-'t 7 tom. A o_:J n _ _ ,.S E'nice _C-J my Wastacly -e r , o ,:tr_ m i ~ic,. p.r a :.:gib. st_,.. :'i _x ~ m to City COAS _ f i l 1_ m e"7. A s a e ~ t _ Cdr. rr_4.aSa yT. rn) _ia "iL .,te?II;_,_, 3i i. 1 E G Car _ % l1 .J l; h , v i 3 s r. i e a. i"s alit d. outside of the ~ ~uY,' _ r _ - t dI _i 1 3. qr'. and E i... it casement . _ Is s a Pond P_.e GP -3 is MentiHea is neing War the j"__ sr,i.. ion if the Department _ of Natural ._'s. fl ]_r e_.,x W err _ -;c Gm_nf._ or `4ork within the pondinj area will require the shall appropriate permit from the JNR- appropriate time trame as required by tKe afEacted agency. ASSESSMENTS: p parcel proposed for planning as the r~,TstaI , U assessments. Thero are no pending assessments W record and no assassmentz are proposed as a conAition of final plar approval. -A C a Box ; S °°+m. _ MIAMI ww r'.ra. ~ n"PT a~+Fra cs+w.., i, ~a® dim .wrxv ...wn ~ Twe, x Y"'°'A N+.mgo umlve +"^`^m +~w .,,w. 3 L .r ~ 47 A i Msme' .".~,o d i "ia° k''~ a %+nn3 l M a 'w.~w.^ # 9 ~ `~a,..a ~ mow' ~ r m . vz -i J. "r 71~lv tau, qae'-i I s taA~ . ...l j - _ , u f- A-Aa .t in 4 'v , f .:.v 1 v -n r.. Lx rip np' ,)V' i I ` , . Pon n. J , . , ' i v . r APq EQUAL OPPCWTUNITY EMPLOYER s ~ - ~ , , ~ ~ I _ u ~ ~ i i i v, ~ 1 s 1, . _ r or Anal "Int in n-pruv-~. . -M be comic! r> W, F3, .4 ~J - f si K e d .i = - i r _ Amuc c i l n "nAl bp .QqKtpWLAl 1" n ,i j A a t n._ nqvn~s and oq r -z" a , crapos-d ..fit. o o , t _ _ , boundary. A. Assessments 1. This development shall "Mt its addlt[OnDi assessmoW a c iian"t with the final ,_at aizensions and the rates in O,_ L At c] KM of Ka v Gat alaDrovan, B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1 - 1 c'm t c; a i+ aIL common Lot linns and adjacent -h -14M.- ' v e. t shall dedicate, - s 1. a r' _ _ r 3 capacity of ~ r tl _1. - _ -'.l... -1 public _l: i LLx • I~.. '~i-• and ~i s _ d r J CLr t _ % 1 ou J _ se of dedicated public Y1 Y` btu as necessacy to s development shall e t , tax , . i and temporary slope easements > .:o~_ ~di_e.+~, ._x_ To? a'J.,c?'7C_ of j urind_ cK nal agency. 4. This oT1._ shall a ~ i.___. tF? T' ^qac te drci_i_ag? _1TS!: pending easements to incorporate the required high w _to ion nera e storm water requirements. C. Plans and Snecifications 1 ; designed .a reqistered professional N.dr ippI_ tied by s <.1 .'L prior to final Plat approval. , " _ 1_ lc.- ' r_ _ % J g, s Y. aa- 1 aoe, E ' r :1 i', rn and sediment control City standards and approved by staFf prior to final plat approVaV 3 . Phis development shall insure than a l c its='[; h!" d__ia e.,._M ,a 1._c streets shall have -x sac constructed in U_< t, _.r, with Cicy engineering standards. "z. A detailed landscape plan, t> Y;, L i ! . on t, A x 't op _ grading s Lildil and approved by St, t t_ prior to the final plat approval. The financial. quarintee shall be _nC L,l 5 d in the L,''c veli t),! ent Contract, and rio-c T. leascl until one year after the e date of installation. ' ' `i STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAf, P as.~7, D . 'u MiC p:. v r a = the p,_C p oi- m i i:. s Lol c-, r rna-VrM A w . w e _ e _ is a, Parks Dedication c ' Ac~j ca E ion Commission ~ stanaard x c ~ L I- d v P.a_ 1_... J..nq Commission i. Council . Approvad: Auipst 25, 2'/ sonnnyber 15, Revinad. T 'l i F L - - _ R-i 3 F V`ti1 Paz t~ : r-I ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ no~ rr Y f Cf6YER s1a a.cnttrt~I ~ ~ i ~ rtJ r 7 k'J5 .z q I n z,. i =sue N; ® r_ 1 I7 ~t `Y rob 1 / r r o~ b b ~ r r +r AR f ® 0 n m ~1, ~ x N A C V o p °p ~ 0 r i j j It I w , y. r.~ 7 7 xr i yJ r a t 11 r i '4' 1 l~ L`. r o r _ G Oe 2 M k n A li N Y A: v _ ~ ~ v ~ _ A- l ~ PONOING RRE'R - , 7 PONDING NOTE - / - ) ~ GPL F CP3 - rot AC 6I - J ORdi0tf0 ST6CAGE~ 4a GFG F/ nw , ` 1 \ ~ _ 1 6 II Vec.WF O Fb t .Y¢.Y _[,eosipV co/+reet ffl+ee ~ - Cras ,>o~ ~ ~R i 1 STREET SECTION 7 TON ~l ~ ~ ~ Pt1dVL11NG RR~~ GPs \ ' S t ~ ` ~ ~ ~ - ~ ! 1 ~ \ ~ NORMAC NATfR LfV£L • BOQ 3 ' / 5 • l Vi F^ /rJ l \i /r/CH WRTC.P LEYCL E/6.0 CONTROL R J5[URBtD AREAS Sf✓LI gC RES~OCFD ~ ~ ~ • ~ . ^ ~j • ~ \ W SOVS O~U 4f G GMUL Nth > f t Cl ~ v t yA .N \ ; ~0' c ~ ~ f ~ \t.~\\ Y~ ~ ~ OF MIV COI NSEEU Mtx t5-L~ O s. s h i E r, Fx/s r,..G coNro~¢s g } - 8eeo PROVOS EP SPOT ECE✓q F:OxS f_ PRLIPOSEO Srb.Pnl SEVER c. ~ w ``a ej' e ~ ~ --i-- P40vP5FD LATCH AASiN 1 / EROS/ON LoNTV- FENCE J E ~ l ~ ~ k ~ f v v~~~` 4-. =cep-'-~-~~14 o - RFUe Gz~rD F<F✓ v { > I - ~i f _I/ - f Oari.l e.~ED WHGR CTRCQe1i R`eD aG j r - - - ACI1f 5%"f o POtd*R}` vRALY ~ ¢ERDSlt~Y CC htX I'Al sas- ~ ,e ~ P CONSTRUCTtf3ht Cor AIC CRY-iTAL C-•- ~ q E,}¢qM, MlNU6501R 6TSS S . ` II r i d r r a-~ r ~ e~ f I t~ t~T f 1 Jf1 f ~ I t ff LL 11 C>~ f z fry K ~ r i 1 m ~ n ntiw Qbpa~xxxx ~ 33 ° "~z 8 ~ ~ ryww ~ M g b b c c P c c rj A u.m ~`2x wE z~y w K o b b p T Y 0 A~ 2 b e T~~ D N? w~ L 2 b` ~ A ~ ~ ➢ ""<71 pi OPo n n ~ ui f2rm `O ~ N m A fi ~ o 4 111 f~ .Now x p y ~ l i J n \ ~ i m r l a - - o~ 5 C ~ A s x z z I- ~F. h ~ m e ' Ss a ~ ➢ i- - F c mac. as 01 CITY OF EAGAN SUBjECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, 0NDITIOWL USE PERMITS, WECIAL PERMIT % ~ .:E D 4i~,_~ PARK `r OTti~Ai ADDITION) u~ r.~_e : 1eLi4 INDUSTRIAL APPIWANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATIOW SE 1/4 OF SECTION WITTING WING: ' WDUSTRIAL) DATT OF PUELIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988 DATE OF REP020 KARCH 16, 038 REPORTED PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS J I . u n lots on i 27.01 , . . h05 r , r " wt i.. _ n_ A~. ._t 1.~i1 Oak Wdi-i h.;1.~l ]1 _ fx1 _ n! i._ l,t; v~ At i _ W a~..J_ City _.i y _io..l~. i.- f.. w . v ea en 11 ._f4J 1997, ?L'' n .Jice. _s... __i _ _ o~,.. ~ Uii ~ n.-y _ ~ _ aN eY nn 1i1irt ..1 .r ice: e _ _ ~ ~~Lmapy issue was Y n Z rn{ e c tr SaW ^ 0 ^ 00 propooll as o rn ? r r q on i_s ; t_ 1-:, location due 7.o nCa , 4c!` t siIl g e,- m1_;_ homes and _ic freeway corridor i , EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently 39 _ zT he ..s,c'1~ >t; a ..G.~ _d by a 6 „ t 1I r pund are thWily wooded vi: "cso W si J?. it pt. is .71.^t i atong Lexington r; -.1_u: jtr`.,_ ,.or_:i of Your ,Ln,-=rl 'a homes - l ; o Agricoltarn! lr,.._,_ 16 ~Zn~pn!y to tin U__, h driveway to Un t ho,_ _x> >_.i_, 3 r two feet. T scu ,.-_n portion o the 5 e A di. C1o Carson Scott _ on We ~_.a .i Lexington i1v.'Silne SITE PLAN: not i '9 acres) i i _.t `19 acres) will serve 504 S . nie jyLv9 ilnic aion7 Wie f-cnt of tile VULW ',nni _ pdu . to twenty-Coup Coot 0101, The PetaiL - alynot 53,000 square feet. ten-foot-wide pnrking 1 stalls '°ll , 'ne .3t, JF allowance tie Code (no for Wice 3pann). Two to ~ , z',_'l ?ou " he tier [ ``n norkinn. tie c consistent atth other similar now Fa&401 in W- MOW aren. - - - , - coveragn " von n 1 .l1 iii '.i-:. sr_d qirk-= s,,t'. __,.n • ee! _d 4_, Y- _ - C'_, 1 AMA- Canoe and q; _ t<, a ci . P a3 ea MfOr 0a AZ t home on l Ado om._ a `a. !t., d. _ .T71,.n.r _t.Q _n-. I- 1,_v1 H _ - - J±V -.r_ c,Jr LntAn, Anur moommenin i. _ - `ar t~e '-~~n or r Imps. - - - J. - ; r r - L. poet tali. o..,or i any sm; L -_'d vE; .i J;" - ;JroM_ W)-.L_ ,1 _ i 1r ea. e m. plan p - k o-.. r a on _ ' - i, Y - t, f Ol!Li, nd:, Wit W Ni.. nal'e 'MO' ireas 1.s _?_o..n ___`.'[lr, a p- - en _ c Oey _ add to N14 `i l ln-..1 O lao project gip,._.i L:. , ` & - ~ the > tie monnT w lot. win NO J y- in nenjad to be YWAO Cron poh! north and zontAbound QQnway lines. De Council can Pntri- .i n "tip -up" t.rt precast . ol l'-:rl C; ( ri 'i wii Lil will be gray have finish. e Prom W WE MWLny Ml b ae i:..en w z C _,Jii cedar , n "i have it PeC mounted sl~n. The mxhal i 0 KP . t u f too `l u!M g W - under ' r .q _,,,et ronftop , _nhaGJ '.1 m 11zI': t was nirl on , 5UNJUPI any - ._l" ON L iec Either n. 1 o_e 110J.. i should . he placed on We R- '-r - ' 1_~„ar JC the 1' arkii;_ area and t "e4,tod inward _ cutoffs 1 we nti., a a,, P l 1 z z !riding = ~-,~-L~ a _ and _ 1 , kJ prom) The , ad 1 70 - - - q inn shows j Vi i 117.3. prnaosol 411050i Vicar VW-I~tsn 13 hot in l' r. CAW q2nn SLAW of hot I Nil! ba aHowefThe Aev,Opmoat proposes to coilect Lai SUMM altar runof-, , t 'Kan Als24argco into Pon! 33-0. PonA PP-12 13 , paqOA1 uf2,~idonvtRad iq rKq aiLy of Wan 3wyn Sower' Pll~~ _ i _ n1. _ . 2 _x c Canny _ A Lam. O.L. .3 l One. rocognizYj an } 12. The ,max ea VNIAng of 't c r n of gut Y appropriate control , movement ' x wL z t xr e snandnainc _ T from _ is t', that _`d 11- ~,~'ti'''z,'1_,`'I~i'_ 1_ ~ the pond _ 3 r f ')am! filling am! t UTILITIES: Sanitarv sewer of sufFicLent depth and w1pachty P,'' r i_~uns~-~~ ly available along °'_3 aL ly Me of tee= 1 nq.or!. Avenue. The jesJ eLe. s ? w i l l he a-'i'=.W,1 .',3 o v an SO<e0' s - to the sal Law. A _ Water ia..11 n' i~, 't` t L, Lf ,a'; ,p:.tr i `.q a.Y.:1 pressure is ?1.,_'iee_.at.i° boulavaf! of i at l o ALL, JP cq i , d d s n _3. r a no rD v_ ,.a ?d ' s. =1 t o l,. protection. - service to each W the proposod lots. SWEETSACCESS/CiRCULATION: Access to the proposea site is aread,Kv available from L..1Otj`7 s.Rn._au The i. pmt>nr._.1 pralimisary A and will iiLaw anij ono Icioss point Ono) L t r__ Avenue in the 1_ I as 'rs o .._l No accesn will he allowel onto uC 2e K .__ds With 1_ KV1101 n2. __nc' 713 be 21' vils each. y - si_~" ~ , J1 ~ on the internal 3Lot _4 zc,>u; Han WI1:M provides the outlet i Puna DP-12k 9 x o_ ma_.s easements are required .a all hydrant lines and !z.e which serve more than one pnvenKal usov, _ Storm Sewer ?!an is yognical tar Pond DP-12. Th-, poriding area along the past side of propasnA Lot 2 has to be southeast Lo the evistdnq storm T ra i^.lam .F . 5kL~• ~J - - - . r`a t~._r'a .a;a Road .-1..111 Wit Armstrong _ le l.. avFrl or t., station is constractnA to provide LKe proper outlet. Dakota County will require a 60 a E right-of-way for LexingWi Avenue County is requiring dediC30on of r2sv&ctea access along toe entire length Mlle 1<v Oak ev e,.j. The G31, s„ » t . a..a o _-u, _ e ~leitcatiCvY s': of restricted access alona Laxinvizon Avenue except for one the eIa1~i'% at 1,o;.'th£'asL -_oI, aor of L s Z as'W corner of Lot s. sevelooment shall he responsible for ensuring regulatory Ag 'racy permits are 4{ x 1 f 2 fit in h appropriate t'~ i_ a e as u , by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: Center industrial Park #10 have Wen leviel the following assessments at +.._i1 proper rates: sanitary sewer trunk, YX a :_l`: trunk and water availability charge. There are no t"➢ et`1,d.u. q assessments - : record. The Eagan special o r fi L o< is a ColAition no MIL ' - - ,pprova 3_ es3C .u io f Rrt _ Qty. Amt Storm sawnf crank L34 $ .0231s! 771,10 of 564,M-5, LexinjvDn R _ a. . 3 500,14 _ _ F_ W_A W_ a a L e- .lea f L Trnw~ 12 21.60/of C TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $194,070 h - , final -ate n.,, will be _ _ _ 5anp! on t irons And dimensions and thn yat03 in OfMat at t eta of e a , < t_ -1ppro az a CONDITIONS: „r. MDUSTMAK F These standard condiliops _ plgt approval QS adopted Vv counci 1 action arl September 15, 1987 SAW! in, arm)1jed With- N 4. PUMMCM exterior sMraou shall be no hiqhec than nine fcet5. All Qqnnqr shall be sub)ncl to the one-time siqn fee of $2,50 per Square o , 7 1tt .mot ,,r'i^n._ cart sioraqc v' a, _ _ t: j_d i._ o tit' L 'm, T H. ! r polu qh! 531 t_ p +.a, _ rcl i nwa or cut offs _,t,:., required if off-site spillaqv occurs, -in 1' 1L ~~n tcasc t . _ u 2- t _ z: l waLpf scnvic- to v each plattAd Wt. °'t-,,a 7 o 4 ':ilt s as ,[,'t >it)l . for providini the properly K protection z U_ 125 angincyrin-j standarls13. The d- v'-'..rtpu_ i3t will > Y r :1 ons _ providing s _ _ entire jenqth along Lexington Menus excant For one 1CC303 point along the common Lot Unes "ntwoen UoLs V and 2. STANDARD CONDITIMS OF PIAT Ai_. A. Assessment-; , E, 0 ACA Cho ocalf's accoLAnnce with Clio Aral in , , a i -:a r na B. Easements and WhOw-M-Wav 1 _ J . _ , _ O `1 ` r ill common r Lines . _ 2. h r ournian d a _ -3 .is an r tit A si p.. env-ivon~n Gor U Ui~ans i. li i.', anency. 4 ; , n a L ' _ 1 c u a t. -Lod _ ~ . . C i t y szorm water , t C. Plans and Mecificatlon'- c streets - ~ - 1041 i~.Q dove .mil i'i t.,.. J 1 1. M; des f qaed- by a rcyiswreA accordance "3 r c, J I .L _ °.e q J a. a 3 C J e i1 ..ra g le2:"-- ,.a.~~, .e drainage, erosion, and _i;eS1?- 9 _ conrra . , , 3. Mis nc, 1 insure that all tomnorary dead eMi nuavrUnow with Cite cooineoring standards. t h, F proposcl stath prior tc the final Plot - z,- , , - T 1 - by incla(ied in the DoveLopmont n~i A one vear after t 6e date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPRDVA,, PAGh i L! 4°a . Public c improvements i_ ° any public o Y,, te _ s are ) iJis i1:._- Lied under contract. t, appropriate C;Ca I .;'t, ml_! su h_ app _ `b'e E. Permits L a This d.: v ' . he rosponsible Lor the aujuinitiw, r~qwir~! by wo -treated agency. F. Parks Dedication c L _.v m a ad a 1,0 e Othor r rl platting be ,pAho cool to u s { un L chic i Mvisony Manning CommissLan City Council Approved: Annuan vs. r September , .,1 S i, 2 STANDARD ..1 t i 2 ~ r r u5 105TAt_ r f SE cav r _ I L Ind. aRfll a -!c r Ind ti gfli a h r . , r _211 a i LOCATION: NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF LEXINGTON AVE & LOAN OAK ROAD ZONING: I-1 LIMITED INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY: B-2 - BUILDING MATERIALS, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL HEATING AND HARDWARE SALES CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE 11-N (SPRINKLERED) RETAIL CENTER AND WAREHOUSE STRUCTURES LOT AREA: 9.321 ACRES, 406,022 FT. HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER GROSS FLOOR AREA: 52,851 S. FT. WAREHOUSE GROSS , FLOOR AREA: 18,380 SQ. FT. COVERED STORAGE AREA: 5,647 SQ. FT. LANDSCAPING: LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED: 15% = 60,903 SQ. FT. LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 13.5% = 54,915 SQ. FT. PARKING: RETAIL FLOOR AREA: 44,483 SQ. FT. REDUCTION: -11,870 NET RETAIL FLOOR AREA: 32,613 SQ. FT. RETAIL: FIRST 20,000 DIVIDED 150 = 133.3 REMAINING 12,615 DIVIDED 200 = 63.1 OFFICE: 1185 DIVIDED 150 = 7.9 PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: 204.3 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED: 222.0 STORE HOURS: MON - FRI 7:00 AM to 9:00 P SAT 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM SUN 10:00 A to 6:00 PM ff7= =11i dM ilk a s 4 , r LLIM SER coo PANY 89 a SAGA MINNESOTA Truman Howell Architects & Assoc., Inc. 620 Mea6e.ssohn Ave. Suite 130 Is., -5427 (612) -41-9777 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: EAGANDALE CENTER 1,N)DUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10 f F r ~f. pI aog° PGtp$ t 1 e « ~ i F~. n4 s I WE to I ~ _ , N - 26 1 a LONE OAK -ROAD C. S . H. ..yJO. I ~ Mh \ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 a 1 4 ~ 6pw i°- i I ~ f ~ k d i~- ~ I in 6 - - M1 ~ s _ i ~ ~ si , , a i ,E~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i _~-h ~ -..,~o. L~~ z 0 ~ O i 1 g MCKEE STREET D f7 i 4 Z _ c 0 / A X 1 s mC J]Z m f O m v 4? T.-..__ REST cm / i f }L_11 a 3 _ j 1 ~ t ~ I IF I 1 ~a j t },per, I 2 - ; Y O n j If i ~ r rn ff ~ ~ ca I L._ J I 'n _t LONE OAK ROAD t .UN IER COMPANY !3 ,r y v i 40 CO F~ ~N i a~ 0 Oq i al ~ i { J A g 0 0 r ^o 17 .Lm a it)h- T _ r LEXINGTON AVE. - r m m T i m N m m ` a. n ~ a LUMBER COMPANY • Sav1A EAGAN MINNESOTA-~iwb x „ ~ Y ~ . 3 . ( 3 ¢ , 0 ` i. t I r t t PN q 0 . r t r y r ~ r y Qp i pc s lef y r ~ 0', A i r i l iI , - r w . .®i...®® ® ®r® r r ,i EXING AVE. { CO. RD. 43 ) 1 2 I ~EAGANDALE 10TH. ADDITION wa r°~ s GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN S r ti~ 1 ~ v 5 3 ~u bU' ~ I fL. L^_ti section a-a section b-b 0 u z ' f?y,0. ~O $EOSH~c?~.' JE Oq„F¢~ i.«:,,~ 4 J section C-C section d-d section a-C z a N a w ,F { n o ,vs Q-tea J~ se0 ~ J 6.. ?ri3°i f: Cr.`_. _^t 3~53tr+~+ C8~i,0 ,.c ..'VE section f-f section 9-g section h-fit C-2 f r i „ U i i I to E ~ ~ ~ " s t C[i R C) v s i ! i i w V LEXINGTON AVE. } M m ma m cMn .i is a m LUMBER COMPANY LANDSCAPE PII ~ ~ "g(gj r~ Iv a m m rO9 , r x t a ~ ' ' I I ~ ul i y ~ 'I. U) I ~r r s t m , i II. \ ~i ~MS7 I 7 m . Q f? D ( , T r 7 x c o •x / I = I ° a °n a CI r < i.. " -n ~9 I ~oo i ? i I I i T 1.1 1 1 1 ,N~ 1 Ili' r- LEXINGTON AVE. m I I x i ~ i m m m m. l , fft IltuvnN ,~n, r I II()tVI I.I g'~~f Ll.1 MEEA COMPANY EAGAN MINNESOTA f i-- 1 - - - ; "Ji m a - lu) ~ ~ pf m e Ll L I Lj -TT-71 +I 4 r + _ c~ v T, m m n o r~ t t j~ m ry= n as q~ to .a ca he ~..1 L' MerawEaOaA hR nm , ,z M _ 111 ~ 1 I m I ( , I I , ~ e 1-09 K , Z A i r ' 1 - I I z i 1 1 + ® ~t V ;ti a$ t1 (y z m~ _p n-1~yg " n m m R9 n -lit O r 1 I i_- i a a_- /t P 6 z ! P- v a"`' T 4N h 8 1d r ~.UMBBR COMPANY N L. - h e i F CAGAN MoWIVESOTA I=ELJ EAGANDALE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: ii CENTER INDUSTRIAL ~ PARK NO. 10 4 N_ ° I : ~ I LLJ . 62,4pcrea ~ r N I-E N m F - f LONE OAK 'ROAD- L { C. S A. N r~N 0.- 2ft1 9 ~Naaaaaia• i.ataaR mcura ®^♦itaii iaaa_. STORM SEWER TRUNK - 17.73 ACRES PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL NO. 10 u . • 43 - ' - 40 I 3,4 O~ , r 4~P yw j /{J { ~'~~I'v~' 49'-•22' WLSC10u !Y d a w ~n v-au'zz' uj 29 N LONE OAK --ROAD-H NO 2fr1 i - LEXINGTON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 806.34 F.F. " I}*uud, .ad hu~~•~iuii ■nc_.-. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIdill YRAILWAY - 806.34 F.F - - CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: THE DAN BAR COMPANY LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT (PLANNING DIV) APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a mini-storage facility on Lot 6, Block 2 of the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. This lot with frontage on both Terminal Drive and Hwy. 13 is located approximately 1/4 mile north of Yankee Doodle Road. Storage facilities are permitted uses within LI districts however, the on-site residence for the manager does require a Conditional Use Permit. SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: The proposed building has a footprint of 71,775 s.f. and will have four floors totaling 287,100 s.f. This is below the 300,000 s.f. total that would initiate the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The lot coverage is 35% in a 35% district. All setbacks meet code requirements and the height will be below the 40' allowed in LI districts. The building will be constructed in a single phase with a covered access ramp on the north side of the building that enters each level much the same as a parking ramp. However, no parking or storage is being proposed on top of the building since the grades fall 401-50' from Hwy. 13 and the top of the structure will be close to the street elevation. A landscape plan will be prepared along with the typical engineering drawings at the building permit stage. Staff does not foresee any problems since the applicant has reviewed the project on an informal basis with representatives from the Community Development Department, Planning and Inspections Division and the Engineering Department. Since the site is a platted lot, this is the normal process. As proposed, this building would be one of the largest (if not the largest) storage facilities in Minnesota and the only one with a totally enclosed, multi-story design. The exterior will consist of concrete with horizontal metal bands that will allow air to circulate through the building. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1) No storage or parking on the roof of the building 2) All signage shall conform to City code requirements 3) The detailed landscape plan shall emphasize the Hwy. 13 corridor image. ASSESSMENTS: Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park has fulfilled assessment obligations except for a portion of the "lateral benefit from storm sewer trunk" identified as follows: PROD. DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 214 Storm Sewer Lateral $9.74/ff 341.47(A) $3,326 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $3,326 (A) Includes 150 foot corner lot credit In accordance with present City special assessment policies, the assessment is proposed as a condition of approval. y / w L a 4`~•, - _ ' s J f U U .i OF91011118 80%; i ' 1 t a ,a w fi L y I i{1W1 I n I ~ 1{ y JtE _b ~l a # Alf, 999999' - a r;- a CO _ Lw co E7 a r ° . S. - F 7" ~ t E - f_.._- i + _r - - - 5`,RTE `'1•~'~INK__Ni~HWfiY 15 `fj v _ . u L-JL i TYPICA'L' i i &Tnw LTTPV-A17 sv o LTteunl l M95'' TT.,c.m i w..wad T r dears Tsncu.. TT Tvna.wl. , I TTnLwL. TTVILAL TTnrn` PQS RENTAL TT k#.AL. STORAGE FACILITY TV19 t.fM I ' i TT Pa e_w,. 1 tYll G,A~ F7 I 00F ~V r ~ CP"g lP.L.. 698,0 0 ~JOHN,50 C-) a~ 1! ) fk ,-a COACHMAN ' 'AK S 71 ~ ~ rv T j' %MINA I aAC rtMA GHLANC (-ry ('rye a i.~. b 4`~. fir G ~r`°°'(f-,.. Z C " ?f FOX MIDGE j _ r u „ yf C:G 1`;ERG /765 * 0 823.5 769.4 829.7 /V 01 QC? / Cp_ 1C, 79 0.7 A-b 806.0 c A- AP-27 ~r 7 400 9 6 3, A 17 602 4 ` t - A-bbb* K 795.0 ♦ r__ i ENpF SUBJECT PARCEL y of eagan STORM SEWER standard L approved: plato U LIC DF ".RTM 21 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (OLSON ADDITION) APPLICANT: DON OLSON LOCATION: 1/4, SECTION 29 EXISTING .BONING: P.D. R-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: An application has been submitted requesting a Preylriinary Plat for the Olson Addition. This plat consists of 2 single family Ic _ on .72 acres located along the east side of Rahn Road just north of Shale Lane. This plan is in conformance with the Eagan Hills West planned development and City's Land Use Plan. SITE PLAN: Lot 1 will contain 18,750 s.f. and the existing brick farm house. The newly created Lot 2 (12,750 s.f.) currently has a barn on it that will be removed. The existing home is connected to city sewer but not water. Code requires a minimum lot size of one acre for R-1 districts without sewer and water. The applicant is willing to make this connection. G DING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Only minor grading is required on proposed Lot 2 in order to establish a suitable building site. Site generated runoff from proposed Lots 1 and 2 is proposed to be directed as it has in the past. Site development will have little impact on adjacent properties. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to serve the site is readily available along Rahn Road. Sanitary sewer service exists for proposed Lot 1 and is proposed for Lot 2. The proposed sanitary sewer service to Lot 2 will require a cleanout located on the property line. Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available along Rahn Road. Existing water service has been provided to proposed Lot 1 and is proposed for Lot 2. /06. ACCESS/EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-VIAY/PERMITS: Access to the proposed site is readily available from Rahn Road. ;Sufficient right-of- way for Rahn Road and sufficient easements for the existing utilities along the east side of Rahn Road are proposed by this development. The development will be responsible for obtaining the proper permits from the City of Eagan for excavation in public right- of-way and hookup to existing utilities. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed parcel has no pending assessments of record and has been levied its share of special assessments for street and utilities except for the following: PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 236 Lateral benefit $13.10/ff 155 ff $2,030.00 trunk water main TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $2,030.00 The above assessment is proposed as a condition of final plat approval and is in accordance with City of Eagan's special assessment policy #82-1. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantitiesand dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: OLSON ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, C2, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. The applicant shall connect to City water on Lot 1. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed 'grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD tll a~ 77-7 L~ } ~t r I 2 f, r I ~ ZONING 4 ~C A' j ~ riezl,~ ' q t I i LAND USE 11 C D` - !r Ll~~ OLSON ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT • DENOTES 112 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND OWES$ OTHERWISE SHOWN T v DENOTES 112 RICH SY IS INCH WON MONUMENT SET - MARKEO WITH REGISTRATION NO. HGa5 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN • Si N HAS THE - WEST SL OF OM TIC NW 114 OF SEC. 2•. T. 28. R 22. Has AN AssuMEn DEaRWC, of s jr iu' ea- w LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE IN FEET a81-`1r nY WHIP' i,+~{ T' r, ref iTt^nV to c f sou t h f'§+~ z9 z X87 ~ tviti.. ri t l{_it'•., ll_/-3l vL~ IF i`y r r-1LJ.~i i ii_~!v l c s a w P u P a s ~ 4 ! Y P 4 t n < 7 . w a 3s n P ~ Ls o0 y 3r .s w n d 1. to a e ~f 411aa<P<ao s'+ a.drx <.i...,_ a < <cach<rly <lovg anadguen 1_aa Il.i. 60 =c <®sea<...a. r«t~...-_c~s <s<..<eancs . I _ V1 ~ 111th s,c,«< c and c of s.cuz'a. " a ~ Y 2 l ` of l: l+t~=H` I_~YA~I_+--!\l~ 1 1 1._; Nf~{, 1-ti_13'1 LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK WATER - 155 F.F. VICINITY MAP i DRAINAGE AND UT•ITY EASEMENTS ' •-z. SITE .I wxla w.<+•.se ~...+u r row o- r.< n u SEC. 29. T. 27, R. 21 CoMPAN1°, INC. SHEET i OF i SHEETS c ~ l I 1 t ~ ~ li a n Q 'i BPG 0 80 I 1~ a , j LE FEET X ~w z l essr,Aw ,r,,,, [ ~ Us ~ t DENOTES S WATERR4AIN s R 1 -r DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER a a DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER ~ I «p i~w * ar > DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE °Z 7$nk-o s s' a y`~ - .v - DENOTES PROPOSED WATER SERVICE I r - y new : naaa• -.r ca r a+ CURB STOP -WET TAP I INCH COPPER SERVICE (72 FEET i INCH COPPER SERVICE) 8 4' TEE (110 FEET 4 INCH PVC SERVICE) s f!tt` corasulrtna awo~w~€ns _ _ _ - PREPARED FOR: j 1V t>G Pt Pk Nf AS antl L(~N6 SUA'J#Ytl RS \ -~.o I _ _ ~ I F'~i E4 WIAKRi GffQUINI] AND UTILITY PLP11Y "lGIFiEER(NG~ - DON C} N cC}t patty, OF OLSON ADDITION _ _ I 1 f Coq E•5, ~A41vi~l E, ulnn ES6i° 3511F PH 43Y 3 + a + ' Q 1 1 9~ ~F LIJ L-1 a Ll x„r PTT HW.10, 126 21.8 II 16 r,J J ~ 1~ f '~t I ~~a~ , . R4.6I72.0 y v 150 5! 12,0 , { h 5 9,, '3 . . 8 1 43 3I70 0 ~ Pt ~ a I ~ i iRt~dt 81 Ji - - l53 46.0/72.0 45 46.3! 7 7 t , i~. 12° D2 2!9.0!65.0 T14ti y 1 1-1 _ 4 l~ 16" - Ap 'IV 16' s i ! ! 2 23(3 lC GRflER (222 7 5112. r 90 7t~Q ~t 16• 1 - YEST - ` - - r` ~i ICENTERI ' d ~x. / a( F9. aa:o+ ! ( ~I ~ 2.5/56.0 228~1 97~0 u 23i 30.8/5~0_- 2? j9) . / i f't K iD G E C L i F F .yr 232 7.+(96 iooo ADDITION % J 85.8!9 0 iLj a.°:.°.°:.°.•.°...... SUBJECT PARCEL I d standard city of eagan WATER approved'. plate 4.1 PUBLIC f WORKS MASTER PLAN DDEPARTMEN11 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT (HOSFORD ADDITION) APPLICANT: JOHN & KAREN HOSFORD LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of five ag. (agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for the Hosford Addition consisting of four lots located south of the Deerwood Drive/Denmark Avenue intersection. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN Currently the Hosford's home is located on proposed Lot 3. They intend to sell that and build on Lot 2 to the east. The site is heavily wooded and has very steep slopes falling to both on and off site depressions. Development is these areas is rather difficult without destroying much of the natural characteristics of the land. As a result, staff is recommending the elimination of the outlot that would make the connection to the unplatted propertly to the west. If and when that piece develops, access can be provided from Deerwood Drive. The temporary cul-de-sac that would have been required will not be necessary. It would have created unnecessary grading in that wooded area if the road would have eventually connected to the west. Code requires a 50' minimum width at the street right-of-way line. Lots 2 and 3 need to be increased from 48' to 50' and 20' to 501, respectively. This can easily be achieved with the elimination of the outlot. The four lots give this plat an overall density of .8 units per acre and all R-1 requirements can be fulfilled with the final plat. The existing home is on a well/septic system and the applicant intends to connect to City utilities as soon as possible. . GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed with this development is limited to grading required for the proposed street and three building pad locations. The grading plan proposes an 8% street grade on the cul-de-sac with a 50' long 2% landing area prior to entering Deerwood Drive. City code requires that street grade should not exceed 20 for the first 100' approaching said intersection. The proposed building pad elevation for Lot 2, Block 1 results in a proposed driveway grade which exceeds the 10% grade as allowed by City Code. A preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was not submitted as a part of this application. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted and approved by staff before a grading permit can be issued or a final plat can be approved. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan should address, but is not limited, to the following items: Lot benching, seeding and mulching, rock construction entrances, silt fence, identify individual responsible for maintaining erosion and sediment control measures, storm sewer inlet control, and rock access pad installation on individual lots. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available along Deerwood Drive. The development proposes to construct an internal sanitary sewer system which would serve each lot with individual services and connect this internal system to the existing system in Deerwood Drive. Water main service to serve this development is readily available in Deerwood Drive. The development will be required to take its water main service from the existing 12" water main in Deerwood Drive, not the 6" as proposed. The development is proposing a 6" water main with water service proposed to each platted parcel. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the site is readily available from Deerwood Drive and proposed in a location opposite Denmark Avenue. A 50' wide cul-de-sac street is proposed to serve the development. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 40' half right-of-way is required for Deerwood Drive. The development proposes right-of-way for the internal street in accordance with City Code requirements. The development is responsible for insuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired in the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for development has fulfilled its assessment obligations for sanitary sewer trunk and water area trunk. The underlying parcel has only partially fulfilled assessment obligations for the following: Lateral benefit trunk -water main, street Deerwood Drive, storm sewer lateral, and sanitary sewer lateral. The underlying parcel has the following pending assessment of record: PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 473 Storm sewer trunk .05/sf 66,000 sf $3,300 TOT PENDING ASSESSMENT $3,300 The following assessments are proposed in accordance with City Special Assessment Policy #82-1: PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 417 Lateral benefit sanitary $15.85/ff 115.69 $1,834 sewer 417 Lateral benefit water 6.55/ff 115.69 $ 758 main 417 Lateral benefit storm 20.83/ff 115.69 $2,410 sewer 417 Street 24.03/ff 115.69 $2,780 417 Storm sewer trunk .056/ff 133,230 $7,461 TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $15,243 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat areas and dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: HOSFORD ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:. A 1, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C5, Dl, El, Fl, & G1. 2. The existing home shall change its address to reflect the new cul-de-sac name. 3. Outlot A shall be eliminated and the street right-of-way width for Lots 2 and 3 shall be a minimum of 501. 4. The well and septic system shall be abandoned to City Standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE O 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD 1 3 ` f 1 ZONING MTCH t"'`L t.lS l'1 f 1( -'Q 4 1 F4 F..1f7 4st ti mar= _ D I- 1 mot) } ~i.!(: . ;A ow, LAND L t. ,c ''•a!x S~vN ti, . . u i1' f ~ rl r ! I - / /,f 1 f ( ~f , r/11l 'lid i WAS/, i r 1 ~r~ i 7 ~ ~fll I a ~ '~f NOR Iti~t~ tl,ll. !t' /.!i? MY, Ilii%!r ~(1, v ( 1 ti3} tf 1t A { v y x✓ lE! lip j w~tt1' I'I i gip. g t 1- I ~ ~i----. M Off, b.4~'' . , It \ j o 4 ~a f t - ~1 ~ C r" 1\// ~~i CE€RW000 t - srr ~ m , i ty J (NARY °..twlM PL f OF . 'FIRST DDITION 7:i- i ✓ _ ` ` t t t,~j - ~ cre mssr ,/r' " r ° 'r it/{)R ; r+..+. » a v r a r ! f tt r r< , r ~~w.~,. t a~ t 1 \ 5 t 1/ ! ! i \ . ~t~?~a \ 4 di}} I}t t l t _ y .a. ..a e < "i°\t 1} I~t 1,}~I 11}i~ai}tt\~o~ ,,,,,_.a , a«aa.» `'hatejl t 14 tit m~,..• ,...«.»»..<a», Y+ ,p \1~,4it .,1 t t,11},il i i~ }114 }li i t~\`` i , t / ~ .r+»,! W, w'. wnxrtrep [,c.•. ~1 ot~~, t \a t li A4 i 1 VAa tltA , t . asw. t V1. t \ 4 t tl "Y' 4 I 1 \ , X7 - '~a7t tit 4 ti 1 >,,\o 1\i~\\~~\ ~=..J-1•~ --wit --...-/Fat l a r t t i ~ VV V` ti ~ ~~,t ~ - F• LATE AL BENEFIT - SANITARY SEWER 115.69 F.F. LATERAL WATER - 115.69 F.F. , { ®RIVc t~.a,d iv \\y~. / PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOSFORD FIRST ADOMON /y) p i a P -:"VFW"~1'a :t F ' ..t1 p/e Rrvae a °P °d'Y'S t : t Jf tl.j,' 1 uwe m.«eaww a» ...a eaa. a A IX \ 4l" 1s °t. tl+.> »r,e.,» « . ~,a , 1 ~ ;fut.; a t?{ yt}~;5"~; y >,-a t t,t{ti St tS t Ij gw%y*tig> } SS4 i°ta•; t r?e »,•.n. a _ tiA:g°. ti tiv`°° {si,.a.^ • a n;+«. .a:-,r« J! d t$ ' e '^."sa 4A~°t4e'a':S~ ® e. ®a,a..e'.ar.»a.. " < r a rvwaa N « f ti{•t v - l !t^ I ;a't t %:}~%y".,`~t,°°'a°• ti V~ y~Y t df' F ,rrawrow b ° a •e4ev ;~~4``'hea~1° L\b~~~D % jr. r a y/, •L . (F~~jy 4'. C I • OELMAR H. $CHWANX A T SEWER ORM LATERAL - 115:69 F.F. :STREET UPGRADING - 115.69 F.F. STORM SEWER TRUNK - 3.0ACRES CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE (WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: BURNSVILLE LUMBER LOCATION: SW 1t4, SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 2, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 10, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of 27.7 AG (Agricultural) acres and a Rezoning of 5.7 acres within that area to an R-1 (Single Family) district for the Whispering Woods 4th Addition. This development will ultimately consist of 57 lots on the 27.7 acres with the first phase containing 14 lots on the 5.7 R-1 zoned land. If the Preliminary Plat is approved, subsequent rezonings and final plats will be required as development occurs. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan. The variance request is for:. 1) 10' front yard setbacks (30' to 201) for Lots 2-5, Block 4 2) 20' front yard setbacks (50' to 301) along Slater Road for Lots 23 and 25, Block 2 and Lots 11 and 12, Block 4. Similar variances along Slater Road have been approved in other subdivisions and those along the interior street are consistent with the 3rd Addition. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This densly wooded site consisting primarily of oaks also contains numerous knolls and depressions. The hardship for the proposed variances was based on these conditions and the developers intent to save as many trees as possible. Surrounding land uses are single family to the north and west (Burnsville), single family and agricultural to the east and unplatted agricultural land to the south along with a large ponding area. SITE PLAN: This layout extends both James Street and Whispering Trail to the south looping back to Slater Road. Outlots A and B near the southeast portion of the plat will eventually become single family lots when that area develops. The lots vary in size from 12,000 s.f. to 27,000 s.f. with most in the 12- 14,000 s.f. range. As proposed, Lot 24, Block 2 Mould need a variance since it is only 30' (50' required) at the street right-of-way line. Public access is also provided from Slater Road, however, due to falling grades from the road, the long driveway from the south is a more likely alternative for site development. The proposed density for the 27.7 acres is 2.1 units/acre. 1 a~ GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted for review for the proposed 4th Addition shows cut and fill areas of approximately 8'-20'. No preliminary grading plan was submitted for review for the balance of the property included in the preliminary plat. Even though a preliminary grading plan was not submitted for the balance of the property not included in the 4th Addition, preliminary street grades were provided. The proposed street grades in the 4th Addition and balance of the property meet all City Code requirements. No preliminary design for street storm sewer was submitted for the proposed 4th Addition as well as the remaining balance of the property. The preliminary street grades identify high points and low points but no storm sewer serving these low points was identified. A preliminary storm sewer design with drainage areas identified is required for further processing of this application. The development proposes storm sewer to pick up a backyard low area common to Lots 1-7, Block 1, of the proposed Whispering Woods 4th Addition, and the northerly adjacent Oak Cliff development. A ponding area is proposed in the backyard areas of Lots 3-5, Block 4, of a future phase. A ponding easement is also required. Preliminary storm sewer and drainage area calculations are needed to ensure an adequate ponding design is developed. From the drainage area calculations based on the preliminary grading plan, a determination will be made as to if the outlet for the proposed ponding area is required at this time or can be constructed during the development of a subsequent phase. At the time of preparation of this report, staff and the developer are working out the details for the preliminary storm sewer design. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for review. The developer is required to submit preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plans prior to issuance of any grading permit. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of adequate capacity and depth to serve the 4th Addition and subsequent platting phases has been provided to the site. The development proposes to adequately serve all platted lots with sanitary sewer service. Water main service of adequate capacity and pressure to serve the 4th Addition and subsequent phases of development have been provided through previous developments. The development proposes to adequately serve all platted lots and loop the water main system. Hydrant coverage is subject to further review during preparation and review of detail construction plans which is included as a part of the final plat approval process. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed 4th Addition and future phases is provided by James Street in the Oak Cliff development, Whispering Trail through the Whispering Woods 3rd Addition and Slater Road, opposite Whispering Woods 2nd Addition along the easterly boundary of the development. The development proposes to provide adequate street service through this site to 'serve all platted lots. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: The development is proposing street right-of-way widths in accordance with City Code for the proposed internal streets. No additional right-of-way is required for Slater Road. The development is required to provide appropriate ponding easements and utility easements for public utilities outside of the proposed public right-of-way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with City swcin'policies in effect at this time, the following a s,.,Lsmen'- is pry c)osed as a condition of final plat approval: PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT Future Storm Sewer Trunk $.056/sf 1,019,304 $57,081 TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $57,081 In accordance with a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Burnsville, all trunk area assessment revenue is to be transferred to them for the financing of the downstream trunk storm sewer facilities through Burnsville. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. Subsequent Rezonings to R-1 districts shall be required with each phase of development prior to the preparation of the Final Plats. 3. The variances as listed in the Staff DReport shall be approved. 4. Lot 24, Block 2 shall have a southerly access with 30' at the street right-of-way line. . STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD I~ - I LOCATION i ;r zs x xaoc _ i ZONING LAND USE r tae x,w~ ~ tnr r ~ a a3 ~ ~ ~ r ~t •a.as ga~,~: I t aYat3 4 P Y•, a Z y, i ° i ~ ~ i~tirc ~ii°~®iYaO~Y. ~a° Y-c 1 ra - o ® u> y- . ~r ]ae t:„4:a..:°r z. } ® p may ? ar = o i 2. Y'sa?aa ^isai"x;eYxEs?€S µa_~ ti5 .hm O 6 ? d u az^ $n Y^ d p 22 2x s ?ie~°i.- az t:a ou a; E-4 Z^ S oit A cfl c ~Y ~ 5 YS=e Y .id:?? t i.5 W7, 5 0 a° 7g3 1 z.s. i z ¢ d fag a ga ~io.< I°_Yi'z}~°sn® .3' 5 V, y ~ y d;m? ~+>F% ~°~aneo$ 6a Yi ~4ax:i s3x;_. :x~Sa a5 e } mod' 3;3N 4uu: W ~ 41a a 8• Y. A.,, , _ a ~M1 ~ M°' _~t:siry, `jT ~~d °,m k3i,e~ x 6a ~ 'P-'.r _~"-...y..a.' Y.. y r 8. 3'+ w 2 ~ \-_~;-•"'r 3 ~..:.e`..:. eeg~a Y-e ~^`•-s.: ~ 4-""`-~-•c F i ~ r- g ~ .r' 1 ~N i -7 r ® {1 oc 4~•'-•,~ 'sir 4a~ / S r ~ .p ~ . a~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - tkG tjk\ \30 evk ! bAw . E }i v ' r jt t` 1 4a ~P~ ID o ' I e ~tkG i / ~ i # r Tf r tt it: t b 3 f f I - i~t i¢ i i S t p J - i Ta eF R a 7.1 F,<4 tt ~ Ja i E f 47ErJ ~ . e I -L 9 ~ ~ i F ~ sa iOiS vF a t r~ «_~•i'YfLktTY d ~ { t r f' . ` , «4~ xr t , Y S 4 i 4 p~ q w+ .s .ic- 4r• sT 1 ~ t ~ ..r...« 4 Yr .+.T 4 ' A, T 23.40 OR M SEWER T - - - r 72 ti m ~ ltL P-4 \a ? m-w x'01 p 8 p2 3 /1 x35 9638 I A-x A oQ i~ - 1- i 1 /AP- B - ias.o b1 • L. ~r~[ f AP r t ' IP 7. 890 t : t5 8940. pNr f c~ , 910,0 9 f 11 ~ I ~E t2 ~t 918.1 ~ LIFE 8P-9 2 I,AP- 12 911 3 it ! 893 3 ff 919,6. zr tiEt. l.. AP-24'( AP-22 ~AP-43 9Q40 8720'. 8736 8960 874.2; 882Q_. 89,5,4, ..9098 A s 8 1' 1 C, 1 a AP 21 AP-26 I - s z` e" v 915© 893 I A'hA! 843.5 ( r i.~ 901 0 jAP 9'' 6 :S5 z" A -cc AP 20 !892.3 ~,m A " 9f6Qi 398.8 3 220 t , AP-49 900P 20 11 R. ea9o j " AP 40 1 A -pp AP-1"I/ ~i 112.1 r~s< I 1 1 it dP-25 6P-k 111 880.5 - r i E At*ViFi~V ~h ~.9t6 t Ltj i 2Qt cin AP 50 B86.5 42 8P2'22 } A as 4` k't ee60 I AP - . 894.0 _ I . i aJ a A"n""' ^u*+er ~t5 - A-11 2 z A d a AP io (A -31 9c'T Q m BP 92- 919 7 AP-13 r' 935 0 5.6 9356 U) - 908.2 ro AP-14 9375 -914.0 912.1 C BP-32r 9339 (r 1 AP-44 919.3 ! 9159 A-ff, 9.376 d~ lS-1 ii l1~d°s_ 9180 A'ee, 1 ' m ,y p „ r ya Og f 2*N 1 m.' AP-19 9999 AP 45 ~38e AP 16 SAP 48 L 9200 920,6 946 9-- AP 15 9235 w• AP-4 9340, Ate" Pi 0" 1~ 9058 ~y93&3 R ;IkA 4~ i 922 0 9262 J~ •49.5 ,t 2-18 < ~~t 925.5 AP-334 9313 ~ "f 934 0 ~i AP 1177-, ; w . dk 9386 / 9260 r 1 940.5.:" , Dn KO'A COIJ"aTY Fvj, P- 9 A-qq r } J7?~-+A'YY 900.0 l P- nr4as i A-xx ' 887 AP-3 697. 9800 FS7n1E^~~_ m ,rv r r ~ 985.3 1 A-zz \\4 4P-1 APPLE SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. It approved: standard 'JBLIC STORM SEWER plate 'WORKS MASTER PLAN r===- DEPARTMENT =Y 07 EAGA,"J" Tjj_ C s PRELIMINARY FLAT .M. NO TH E ELEMENTARY SCHOOL APPLICANT: iND 7 SCEOOL DISTRICT 196 LOCAT10; SW 1/4 SECT _NG: s (PUBLIC FACILITIES) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988 DATE _.E_ _ v M R , F_ s. .,D _ _ 3. PLANNING :_...._..E_._ . _ _.Ri ANT.., APPLICATION: N - 0t3 of - an r Lou rnQrjanton „a._z ._1 he o S'... r.. r _ __i e ld Lo . Kaa to !"n j _ e 711a -m~ La _ . 1 time fop Lot Staff ' plAnnin; tic ~oUro ptylin~ is "no 1W to L_L 1' lLi_ r _ f m. i r ,r 0 _ 13 a `LC' Inn. pct : of County r oA!1 30. Lacn J s of s,, _ . s K AU r.... , 54e i'_ _wt'I°. _a_ r r i_ < a a an and ,at J3 y purposes. Ca Qiy, Warp Arn ~1000 ca cats _ . the school ppopocty. FLnal locations, a3 w-11 ao the numte- W access points, need to be C Lved _ 1nc final pint o tia .on. .,_i.y q L front L - builWng. Staff - r]..a rc.l.: .Tc ._n_..d_P^ circulation is concerned, pecial_. stave bus 1a4 .'1+.;. .,r...tSt, W ~~L counter clockwise 3m~, ..OT7 o i 7r"eI d., not o__L. !a &_u.,. of _a_ Ti., L , nlfy'ng ;no of th'' ILant W r C Lt; e to better atiLlyn ia, niterfal. J _ L:. can a.. _ _ mJ1~ ,T Wth the 1- na_ `i?i; T1 ;?tT 3_ oY<w -c , _ r _ a ~ - V - 3 ti ' L nolt4arly silo of lot 2 von t, 13 i. i - 2q ]VOO La C A - "nod ~OW z E - 1110001. CIO vabrunrv 13, 1 S 1 n nuvaitted'. pronscKan of adjacorit oiewof USUVwqQ lloasi pronscKan of adjacorit protection OF cat and HK SIDnW3 From 11011mi protection OF cat and HK SIDnW3 From 11011mi OrAinnap MZ100of yrapo,~t 1 OrAinnap arnas, stabilPation of yrapo,~t waL,rmays an! an! iewof ~nz i Laos, inlo' r - - - J s a MITS/a!C., F L-'t . No _j c_~ n.v _ -„F i_ i ce, .a ` Y - M z.E? - Jo propo3mi / . .,e _ a - - - - j h „,7 r 2 t s v for Pond W-29. -s. 60 3.l§ u .,:ii1t-of-w will b - Wit- i -d for E fffeV Road. d t7 f? I i:?m-n n=- will be qtr _F or -`1 s . Cd that ;-g The time requiatary appropriate i-1SSES SMENTS : The _ th i Elementary S - l i h.~:_a pr ViiO s and 4atRr lateral benefit Erom trank watRr main ander Project 4's 299 and 3= L ham. storm sewer area trunk assessment is pending under Protect 479. City . .E records show this -E ~1 _~tcj t=~ assessment be $67,425. T :1 v _ =i z_.e {ar city spacial _.s e. _ _ _L ,j as consition of final FH0j 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QTY 479 Storm Sonar Tr~nk Qpgrade L,630,3% A~ TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $206 The final amount Plat- dinensinns - time W ulna! »M _ r'3v2l> CONDITT NS: NO 3H EW E 3,',;i°;,N'.'.' 4Y SC50W 1. These standard 4 t3 i",(zi r i;.,ns W plat. aL a~ ca! adoj tiC± by ud:1;'_! a st'~~, . .,E'['! T i7~f' 1J , 1987 shall he complied ,a ! i. hi Ai f B!, H2r 133, B,r QF 6_2r C4, i'_I-r no Gl AAssessments 1. This developmont shall accent Lts additional J s.., ail C . 1 , _ r ac:.aL.i,_9WO situ the a Easements and i h Pt= Wav e r r + r Casements 1 c 2. This WevaLopmant shall AwQnre, provide, or QnancLallv t O.> "s _ 4i , na 3.r n 7 , _ on!._ng and a ti lizi, Led on s a this AC V ; a _ -a r easements and 'appojorijac ' 1 iC t ian . L. d !Z ncy - - T h i s d_ _ ..z to dr requirements. C. Plans and Specification,,,; -r i ~ pub ' streets ~ C and ,Q ecessary to provide servicn? to thi1Jdevelopment i1 reqistered _ - - 1. a - n _ in accordance wAJ 1 City co i-'s snancards - - approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2 s detailed. grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control 1A must c standards and approved by starE prior t final plat approval. This development constructed in _ _ of a_. _ _ w _h ' engineer Hy soundards. the 4. A detailed iandscape plan shall be submitted ona proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the approval. final plat ii,cs-v ;ej 1Cl t, t "c, ' Development e dl f~ . Contract i t s c-€ ~ r3 unniL one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CGNDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAI, PAGE TWO or s ' F r- a_c>. n c wiu,_ City Fn ` _s. D. Public Mprovements y public WAY conrrnct, tne appropriate wrojacE must be approve,,, uy : ,l ,u.tel.,i ~ _ _ ~l_ Prior n.... .a aL Ar .i_., E. Permiti; u shal 1 be responsible for the acquis -L tin!" L L f L , t t_ o r. ,f i1olancy permits _ i V2 t i a . a M,, by 1 = e j uqency, F. Parks Dedicatia-i T rail u i ram ants as by v m, Recreation Commission and pA ovc, a by Coun.. - L i _ _ ian„ G. Other Ls Al st.a[7da~ l p' ~ttwnCj and Csni' ~ s;t:3iI 1:,e CS. U, i 10S._ Spec i iC a ~ 4" . , aI L t._' Li %"I C .i.-.. nh 10,' CouwiL action. Advisory Planning Commission City I C; !.nc iL Approvem Al us 25, 1997 September 15, M7 T STANDARD _ Y I ORTxORTx Y. k _ R-1 -7-0 ( f avr~rrtvtcw _ ~ ~I11 I r 4 a: I JillJill , Sgt F s RR .~5~ ~3 ~ G KK@ 33 8 R 8@@ ~ ~ ii z Z3 N lye, 2 - - .10 r „ T. v a - SCHOOL . - SOCCER r bASEBN.$ j c _ E P. 6 so { a ; 77, - P`a - esu*wc rR to i s r t @ i ~B i j r ---ic ti 1 h L - - cF ~ na~~ i i r ,E u~ y - - x - t v f k de 1 r „ f f` x t - _ _ is 101, DAKOTA HILLS VIDDLE SCHOOL ^S FAGAN RICH SCHOOL - ~ ~ ~ z ~ - aanus run ou., nsav d r_ r 1 { o,~ s ~ewv ~ r~ a.~ o[a'taam ueout oizarct iifa ` x _ ~•O j'i.- nl~ t /°t>v _ ~ 1,' 77-1 'W9St M0uai ~0~Y Xk(S~~A ;.y n , F a 3 e ~ _ _ 8~ri on P 400 l3 l soRO,EEO _ t~ IT- v _ITI _ 1 SITE UTILITIES SURFACING (WEST) , 1 - DESIGN i DEVELOPMENT C4. 3 CITY ,-a n_ CORIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION) LOCATION: N 112 SECT 23 EXIMINS ZONTNI: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE Ji: _ ,.U, ._EA,I..,..m BAR <1 88 DATE OF REPORT: MAHCH 15, 190 R E 1 C` i BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING r a _n loqs 111P C -I < . _ ) in , h' _ 1 im ?_7`• 1 i ,..,,rte kyl _ bniI3 p n d _.1 .,c_ P10701. 1H a i'e fu- me lV1010 , . E A . . _ . _ - i V i a and . _:a _ All not hAOLUAV _ a L. EXISTING CONDITIONS Bold bray, C " : i i i` _ „ . 1 fcatire point. 1„ ._.t linusing. < re of ._E to as scatter.. trees ti open Frassiand. - d on r ,`el hLuq?i all _,.t moot H-1 coda Also, Me ave p:_Y° ladto.v o._ for 05< k. Addition _ tdi. l t1 An K o - a C Ji? as an a r dnA`ninion {u „ ~iw SITE PLAN/CODE ONF(y ,.`..blAY C._„ This 1_i " .,•firved primarily pour Lcr~ . . points Prom Wescott Road » Cy -d tint, LL i p _'_:'.a . K L: c ph ons cp Me north side K 1e , . as - l nniu &t: e - _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - , ~ ~ - - y . _ ~ _ _ - , - 3 m~ ~ , e ~ , . ~ ~ n _ ~ a t. , . ~ ,z_ _ _ , ~ _ , ; ` - - _ 1 Aw33 E. `3.O. .`M CONTROL: at_a....) !]i ._.d ~ ,wd .:g _.:s GRA3_lE,vim( DRx'w.F^R o os a 5 ar impacts L i, 7 Siva topography. h.. A the WIUS an ' 1. aninniny a, ..f oattarns - - Square '1. v ..,-L 003 ks cequireA Lo he constructed 3Y an 010vation that NUI ...t Pond . _ . 11e The high m in __Ae , _y v v . _ n e , i "escarly OF 0e r .:r i Square Aadition. All of the aro u Worm Sawar Plan. The proposej storm sewer Q the nDrtharLy ondi o t tr.'aC. it Wescott Road 6 cannot i i> r:.ra f ,r' L_ a '1 Lo , L r_ storm newer at WascDtt Roaa as m The arninaqe area tributary to the storm sewer. inclujill the intersection of ;1 u , _ i _ _ L. into Pond M-30 in the IVL ~ of 1 Sqk aro Aa -K-.'`? x This drainage area was orig? r ls : r anticinatod to U it 1'" .e l..F'.'3 l?11j M.30a _';l+' r>..3 . >_,;_i1'l sewer outlat and recono grading adjacent to Pond A-30 Un ' Laxialton ' ' Addition a.?i. r r . v i _._a ? , _ the .aui .;?'_i scorage and 1 . i_. _ v w rates h a been tii ; " o`'r' . A a'._ , tar. The n_<' at._ for kt oI~.l a_j P .i 8 is _ t i t rld as } "..i rt. of this sd t_, development. The fol1C3'11nc3 a._v g nsW. "i.7oz1s are ±i_'Je!7 fol. pn, r Mtn development- (AMES) _ t _ 42.-) 1.7 MKS 073M 9 , _ - 3 10-9 1.0 11 a . " 4.0 .p. 21 223. _ . v t 5.3 j2_54 9.1-3 1.0 977.3 A r _a r _ r , 0''- a r provilas For . Pool , s the M._c p o e : C, t e La ,1 AWL in proposed Cho i' year 00LIP provided at those r ~ p . S a3 T Erosion an! n! Sediment Coa...ro Plan a . V~. b submittal for ~ 4- r'z2 as ri part of this C a. d. ' Ls s. . u v er qs UTILITIES: watar Conservation District. the Br t !e Ride A%d.1-_a nNoct., 1 U. Part Road, and Lexington each 7 t.n i.d . S _ Addition. The C; t i. i._. c tributary ' e': it x of n .r , , with ; the -ed sow &W : _i , 1 C o_ a. _ _s ? ~.,t.: t'd1. . . `e x ~ , ,,_t _ ..~i!:_. . _ _ the Comprohnnsivy - y Sewer Plan. Water main service K sufficient proviaed by a 16" trunk water main K NorobvieN Pack Road and a 12" trunk wat2r m0n in Wescott Road. T02 datadLs ot the. proposed i tv fib 3 i water mcti[t system are 11'' it. n to further review. '3TWTS/ACC7SS/CTRCULAT1?N: Flo - e _ tn the Y- - . v... - Y , . i Park Ravi T L S0015. - _ nr "Z nn wv _gridiry NO.) proMs"I 0 ~trnnus ace l J. i w to A _ v ro ai~y aI 1 _ c ni _J vevnw;venu an r5c narsh 3W of Wescott ' s S ` a9 n. T . I GHm 9~ :aT x MI = mo w n , . ~ > - - 7 v we roquire', v - d. _ d _ _ L.: i Deti L C` me n t m v e l_ J ' m , _ is _ e(ui rM r p L requiwod by the City Comprahansive Plans. 1r. e:. rpquNad h_,_ in 20 i i;3i _ ay. , ._c.. }r.-., r lry 1 - i n C i t y Zoo ' _ I _ - s s to _ , :_i .i,. Qi. _ rya. u _ v._e'ce WhKcienL right-of-way _ - hall is ASSESSMENTS: A porown of i trunk Wity recarls show asses3ments wendLnq uplar Project I's 493, 401, 494, 435, 479, and 458. Thahe Project V3 identifV assessments main, trunk area cbarqns Hr sanitary nowor, storm sewer an(I z t.... mail _ .~"i u ~.ac'C a,.:sor7 „T°e_i7. t". s ?Ec_ ;i7 _:1v 7yi. t Road ak=i 1. _~r , Wescott _ ~ o_._p T ho amount e ,.nom, _ as ,.__..s _s' iii nacanianco ,.ter ° __.i.._l assessment po._ s z-s in .,0e_.. _ at this t i m e a condition of final plat approval: " PROi 1 4 Pra Y T QUANTITY AMOUNT 491 Storm Sower Trunk .053/3E 404,240 $ 21,40-. 491/490 Lateral BnQeFit TrunK Storm Sewer -i ) a E> 3/ f- 16W,000 y> 3- 3/ I TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $ 60,752 All - final assessment r.. b'_ 1 ! af,_ ? o will be ' a ' i `1:.:'1 'c :..1. the Y, zi'+ - ns .sma 8?Ie''lslv._s w_. the i.;yrxg .F- ,d. in .i..cwrl.. aii'.'_E KLI the rites ia effect at the time of t4c Anal plat approval. MN HMN 112) 4630626 Anil and vatnr C"sourro:, r I uaun-v, _ ow 'Cr a " whit .l L. . _ "1 _ . )noj Tip ;i His a - 3 _ _ o _ 'f s , _ u i.-, , e Z'Inp _ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNNY EMPLOYEF3 I . . i in r . - _ - 4 I . - t I 0 - 1 1 --1 4 71 c i 1 -n 'PACK V T Ad -n- s 1 i. 1 9` gip- Imo, r n 1 ~v win no ri; t• + _ , r . J ci.. cv V _ 1 . . . l _ _ , a ~r ~i r a i . v - & 's r v , , _ COTO too - t , _L -1f a "'j. vrp~ !in sit- will roach Fish LA~p . v _ . juntity. i . b i L :C „ 1 „ - _ Shorn! _ cm ..a n r ,e > !r H r = _ `,-e-e: i c4a D,.. W ; I - ea hn the _ LaconA ?w1 t on w_ ~ t ap R I { o I I_. ALL on aLlowed, C - ° r q Q 011 f be i , s= :4 the 3uli. L a 5 A j Am Q', M]T Na:'ARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT eiG1P OVr'<wi...t A. Assessments i a vb 1 *r i additicnal assessment n " _ { in L c at. the _ , v KO plot approva H. Easements and Riahts-af-way .c v e lopment 00 ? d i Cat__ W, d. i a_ C n d 1 G over all common lou lines an! ~1-jncont - v a Property a - tight-or-way. 2. This javeLopment shall dedwate, provide, or financially COSES of "Waitional - _ l ` .c - 1 r t.. - r " , } . o M1 _,Sl - ~ i _ i<e. ~ ,~.9. _ u-.. all u~.' 1..1 v. u cA.. "t .J1. "w- aT temporaVy slope easements for uivimaLe development W and s javeloomont shall _ 7g easements _...o1. oi,aEi- the required ha.git i,'a`..e1_ a y'a,:ion nc,''. ess i t C by City M ._._.T lire,:: n,_._+< C. Mans and Specitications 1w All public ` t o v ti t-'o t, this developmeran shall be a rnaistered /f`. r L~ standards to =1 1 _ _ ' f and y grading, a ; i e Ci : ~i s. a i , z a7 e erosion. and sediment City stanjaras and approved by staff prior to tinal plat `pp o a W This develooment shall insure that all temporary dead endl a1 1. s t r e e t s shall _ hG`. ve a cul-de-sac . A. st Wl_ OC in accordance with City engineering stanjords. 4. .1 l_;a landscape plan shall be submitted on nth-,'. r oN,., __,i b_ an! approved by staff prior to gib 1 i-i~3 1 I:~ z. x c r zU al. ! fin an c' l ::_i ~ - ::x i c_ shall b l.ci m t in the Development Contract and not releasel until one j STANDARD C0N'H-)',,TI0NS 01' PLAT APPROVa, PACE TWO . A] L t' r "1 !"Q! 1. , 1 r o +.r ; _ i i j L ._1 A t h l P'O with i s s a _ - D. Public Empravemenn~ r . b 1, ia project _.os._ ~ r i - ' Prior L. -,i _ L .ient WWI b responsible L the eci7i Atio--, 11 1 t '-5 : n agency _ HewroaKan it atl sliJ and vvf- Z by o L awtio,. as ; - Ott i n..- .tit;' zoning wona it ions s ha ? be U11 ions P O _ i l y WI O L, V~Ir _ , t..-. pia Pl Nn i U..mis on City ou ci, Apgrovaj: LTS v t. A R k 'I : { , R-I R-I t C C i ~~..1 i:41 tASi~l :=~f} i~=~y p'~~~~...ti aIKNf C}~13 SUh~.~.-_.,.~Q •Z r _ { s I r'' , . . - PHASE - I Tt LocnnoN uan PHASE P} ASE Ill . . s w w - - .1~ w TYPICAL DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENTS PHASE IL PHASE 17 Lill L_ - 9 l 111 J , -PHASE 17 15 r SE I PHA i - - _ tF8161988 v ' R£CEIVEDFEB i S 1988 E DESCRIPTION TM tee,,. } . H , n 1 % CITY OF EAGAN _.,.T m PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, 2EZONENG, PRELIMINARY FLAT MTAATFC9D OAKS ADDITION) Y 9 APPLICANT: '.7s_,: .I-J> Titn..,, 'da"~`am ?~~.t .~.....,c_<_0., LOCATION: 112 . _ ICN EXISTING ZONING: PLANNE3 DEVELOPMEN'I'' DATE F PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH :4, 988 DATE O REPORT: VAR CH 5 q 1038 DEPARTMENTS ' PPLW., ."Ju lat a. 1.; ' L - _L rJ hive ht oJi s w4 t r lue:J _ a razo Anvein ,nom { n , 4. " - and thal~ _ Ka t i. r t r .r, s 7io v , prvacnn , _ _ ii 1 n, 00 3 L in conformance with h City's _ 4 inn a Use PM. An. %v u n,r_ 1n3. lw na1G o_ .s.lE oL L_ in the privocio W Winn .'r`-. - ii for, EXIZTIWG N . S« Eagan O P.D. C o_iWn X1:7 334 tot_! DZ ASK action wa,~ unlz5 was wriv0d in AT for A - pevicA. En - v f.,a.,. L.. ,,.t nd tic .n .em.._._ for 3 throe year period. At ut D2 _ _c d Addition ka also approved Y° ]22 i i me , union on :Fie s site of _ :L,._ nu., 1_,. ,a.. RoAd _..w the .C" acres on His _ =ice 0 de =dex W 13',... no more than in 1 i r' units, Tic 427 _ t_.. 1 us ipr _ , :j on . went n1 V of _ :l ,_:k Wad on 32.,_-' to no east, quad io)1es to tie south and le.tdt; 4'ht v C1 11B and H._T zoned land to ~ West. _ c Lit- _ P.D. CoC o ,T,; l.iti _ ,ir, _ A__ _isG °-td s connection o_ . n from __so.3 _.o Like Rion! 1011 Cake _.:3dn ,`_1l _a1 is nor,o:L ni; ML._, L1n, plan litiounn the d Kis r r _ ~ , . vZ 100 WiAo l. Lam; c' z~1er p-1 r_. 03 ,e"1. 50020_! Ali „L., in 1 _;o _ on n r .n m . lip tn~cZripay _ rod l _ c ka1 .3at t e_ iiyl fia.6_ }'_rrra`., 1 r nt_ AL'-' .__'a au .on.t:,, o._ propoPQ line W also rather heivi-ly wooond ind little gr2Wril is proposed W then °_r a® Other l:4.,1 _v,kr., tr.__, ti a?t.__ ire found s _ e! t. iY''Dl.ij1Cu. .1 E site. A US! 20 ON/ r 0,11' - „ ;C1 I , - - y orl x,1.1.1 w;1~:. .~.C'v_ j in J. _ _ oortlvn [ :1 VA? Sommer nrin F311 'f a r a hon ti_. Wylve n t_„ _ ae plinn-a _ parnt~lly .n.-a ti_ VAC _ , r parking _ or :1 WT~nr!v , or. x-. n sqL ,_0 440 _K _ R r KuJALncn must - - of i fir from t point . . 7urrontly tin . "r nom 0' _ nA _ I._ _ , Ve :=000 10 1113_ tie i live _ t W 7__ Q Z `l26 01 K c. 411, Y . _ 0 i_ L i1, in t _ . . Va. ° i- h.b proposed 1 rte; C ~ ~ g wcpks well [ c m - -rte o t ALo') _ . - _ ,o so _ns t _ South. l ut , A,_ ,r'_, i . Wia c _ enz and e nog _ _r__ ti _ f .n, AMENITIES PROPOSED: Central alp. 2elf AeCrosoing tuilt-in 5j> OF the units, outdoor pool. two ttlLs courts. e, o 1 l court, 3 hard Surfaced game rourn, WL WQ aw club nouse Viat inclunns in exareQe room, party _ - . ,f,i k~. ° , and au_3£,_ a ..reAli _1W_ c ;3 l covered a. k i,` stalls nKave also Wen provided for rwwLiL Use. fie 329 unit max will ccnsls'c~ efTWWKno it 450 S.C. 16 Wriroienci2s at 525 s.f. 14 !-bedroom/! both at 710 36 _ ' :CAI , ,A. baWdyn at 350 . i 136 2 _ ar _ Gi n4 i)'Gt ,.,.i. ,r.. ..?di_. p... .e.,a i 00 ~ ~R L' t F..rL'{.~~_ ~.:~s ~.~za_\ ~.xT._._ O..3O_. CONTROL: _._2 ~rnpon~. .5 tn ;K0 t to no low - ailt ? ! O t, at , , r „ Appriximat0y LA LAO _ _ r x Cuts , to proposal hVildinj pad wlevatQnz. . 7 A " i The t 1 nho M! sit-a Ono fn W 1 "ano _ - V0 the _ t _ --del -l(, s .Z7 ewe sv t an to a_ LOW .-a Lit _0ve as ;n < M :1 L. t < L. 1. n 1r a to n e naR z z , consi3eration in design. W-ts into W _t # l a ni j o _a _ 0.a" ! 1-3m the z sLtos is on be ! - r - M ponjinq area by or W 3n Anarnal storm sower sy mx t ~ 4 rion Ji Lie ` .,ti a._nY no . x._ t runoff sS~_ t_~ interiaL storm , 1 .x.1. ,L a < aA Mont l_, Y t Man was 1i, t or reviow as a part W this appticatWn. Attacked 3ro commenLs fro,-, t 1.S, y t f t _ ,._~_,_s . ~ Soil and Fdv._r Conservation M , c_ iC%s: _ "ice. ' SOi L .Ems.,_urco, ,aac er as.?Ar;ra. and erosion and sediment nt ~i- on or T,7TIL. TIE A w, ~ar main servics of U i t iii capacity a - a prnnzAcu no servo ~h2 to be looped as necassary Vo prDviaa the adequate fire demanci requirements. ..y .3 . . 7ry sewer s._ v.. _ _ is not eWs y DvS v :C ,1 ble to oY° r e t:7 R; Devalopment. The Developmonc wiLl need to extend sanitary sewer, service a. a. o;iI the . 1 si. Q service 1 C `L o .a.... L. _ of Thomas L,,,.. Road and Clcmson Drive. The Development proposes system. The D_. an.d. it a san_C:,x- ._i ro_~_ 73teui in tic.'. I'1'v..`i:,. the v - ; i. p o'x proposes _ 9 ti op sanitary sewer only 10 feet Erom the p D ?tio b s_ 1 t The ve1op .'.?sF. will be __,3'..11.1=.. u ,'.:terra an 3 water main _tC} r.,?1", w3t''t. ?_i r' in the et_. e-'ap- "lsio?i of _:%r,:._ a T _,,D__ Rii af_~ Road STREETVACCESSWIRCULATION: Devilopment orownses to take, r on the north AS Somas DaKa Roa~-, cess on LAO cast through Ohl construction at in n3st/asst PVDH,-~ - c~' _ ` which YdC.,,_ ? lz,~i..air.. L _ Thomas Lake Road . _ ..i.A'C _t i ;a.n.:". i..s";-i'_7C o t o..,n.nY L.a.c.. i .aUc.d< The Development proposal aast/west pubLic street. Y- f T• w i l l _ O e . . . , bi-. , for dedicating a 60 _ : _ -t'."` l T,-as 1F _oi _ c Y F x„ o". n. xsT a...sZ. pub! Lc _ s _ ee , o[3.. _ v . no _ ns Thomas Lake Roa. CAE r to c42 TaLwY2 extansinn at Road except in O<s': c,e ona <aq <3 _c _ ,j `l x_ '.F. way for Tix ,_,rt3 Lake x.a A has y e`7 t ,zs_ v ,sez..n provided _ or The D - rs h t- _ Way, assd'Lng easements, and oti!Lty ea"s mera, s for those ti .V All requLatory agenc; normits shall be acquired within the p j e p_ , 1 -_c time H. _iL i_. _d by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: Tie ' -u.,. od- ° v n', parcels i.. the i :"3o,> eLi J previously been nssessoA for saniLary sewer trunk, watar 1 V, sewer - ._l. 1x}p , _i..~`~'e trunk and Thomas ",.aZS Lake Road- e City . ~.L-.~o show no pending .~',u~~._..s,_Z!„'_!___ of record and _.:1c3 4-s are proposed . as 3 condition . ~_"lli:f1>"3 d_t.... fox lo!"{_x asseus.ae"db apprDval in accordance with special assasoment policies in effem- at this time-, PROj DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 8 Lateral Benefit $ 827.42 $17,S72 Ma in Future Trailway $13.00/if 2,042.00 $26,54-'-75 Future r if I lay R h 237 lateral Benefit Water $ . 5 0 i a f 1,064.52 lJ 9,048 U T}.3 r iii. 237 Thomas Lake Road $42.15/0-' 360.01 $15,17z~ Upgrade ..._,-n Storm Sewer Sewer Trunk $ an~'~ ..7/~~,_ 1,484,753.00 $103,933 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 0 Ail final ,3 7s-'_;ne'l.en`- obligations will be calculated based '..`,n the z,7. 4 ~._1 of the _ 4-in_r. plat a%si in accordance wit-'h qu ~ n t s an] _ _ en 1.' ,.ie rates in affect at the time of the v xaL plat approval. i r c r y.. ~ ~ i i - _ _ _ ~ C_ i . ~ _ ~ ~ . , ~ i ~..a~~.. i ~ _ 1 ~ ~ ~ r , z _ 4 ~ , r Those _ standard conditions of plat approval _ c.. a, ire ted Council ac; ion an Su1.-> 15, 19X/ Mini! W cntoplied with. At, 131, Ida,.-_, zi_>, R4r CL, C2, CA. , _ DI. EI. , V!; tC;i GL s d, v - _ _;t)aj_ s ._;z . I wake each - l:winnt 0 renter a wa of the park no _t a i _..~,_1, ~ in ~ _ . _"Kea _'mot the 1:.,.. ,.xhm l JTt, All Ua~h i nz - _ i __a, _ . _o ' i moijins ro 1 _ . ,r , , .C7 , a _ t- too iu M, storm ewa >m_ 7 - apntraLly located polling irsa. t~ 3' aijacont property is raquirad. 'Tic L Vii; .L y e for AAssesswents 1. This development shall accept Its additional assessment a Y t . ns 3 de accordance with the fi. a [ Q.l t dimensions B. Easements and Riqhts-of-Wav 1. This developmeM shall casumonts connered over - J common linos vc w properry right-of-way. financially guarantoo its proportionare snare of the accpjisinion r o u 1 e a b v v ~ i.i ~L. t p t, public rham-M-Way as nocessacy no -C a is ae v u- men f._. e A__ . e ._o. :;_zt shall dedicate all public nt n.t-LV .r an temporary slope easements for uitimate development ot' . W' 1 e t - roadways as by t-br jurisdictional _?qencym 4. This development shall dedicate adequate dra---'aqe 'and, l;_ind. int-t easements to incorporate the required high water elcvation necessizated by City storm water szorayn voiumo requiraments. C. Plans and Specifications Al- - p-,brstreed « an + C_.~ n _s +s to i' tt development , .r _U r ~ , - : ~ shall into d e s i g n e d b regiscered professional engineer in accordance with Citv r ~ c i., e C.I .t.~r ~t prior . to i .L A t al approval. ' 'L3_' i 1 2 e ~ t ~ E~.,: grading, ta< siY1age, r°?-'mss. icY2, ,r•! sediment ...oIkLr.1l plcb>'s must be prepared in ,s`..co_1_dI7"'~ with c.1:re - :l City standards and approved by staff prior to final plalt approval. development Jw T rt.r , s :h.~~til insure t1~.~__ all ,~d temporary dead E?Tid have l_ -ii . ' I` e C.'. S shall A ec.i E3 d _ MI _Y e cs. C.. constructed in a accardanve with City Pnoineering standards, proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financAl quaraintee shall be t 1 C'_~. i t,uE?_~, E.' 1_;i? ,j i. i tji}tit,_1!t .c,~nti `f 3:.. ;:7t .~ciea c,d until one year after the date of installation, STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVA!, PAGE TWO 5. y a 1, 1Y, _ tiX:CI pr1 va _e t_r ts sh l lbe~ h with MV Awnian StInAards. D. Public improvements any -y.' L to improvemenC3 - - r L . e-. , _ bu7-'er 1.. ..._i , p ~ a.~,_ n 2v" E r r m n,,.y. F. Parks Dedicatios a w, , ul e i. s h y - G. Other - < A t .i t- 't. i n C.j c_L c .&M d 1. i.' 0; t-11 i t ca"Pail action. . Approved: Aunust 25, Soorember 15, 19H7 LTSF21 STANDARD "i A R B if 4 d j ,j~ a~ ;ter r rr_`----i r-,- - , i FHB ti f' w (FD PRELIMINARY PLAT k tti 95 412 3Y9Sf - - ' Y _ COUNTY ROAD _ NO. 30 LEGAL DESCRIPTION / IY y xn en.e e. ` or c een.:.e ii a:.cn°r :n 2 xoe. .cr. wr. c. A° 3 ` / w N LOT f _ 7 A 0 Toth- -h wcroc s„ 6- 4/ BLOCK a, x«o vL°s / 1 m}; ' alt ; AkEA TAIIAAT" BLOCK 2 ~l Viz` ! r•C ~..~e ~ ....,.,..n,.~ rte' / ; ~ r c 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT _ `LOT f a j > \ 8 ON . -W \ - s--- DEER JELD _ COT t i t .tr~® \ • ? ) -100 O 100 200 300 YR;MTY rAn N BLOCK 3 74 • ^x • j LEGEND - ~ TOTAL PLAT AREA 41.5 AC. NOTE: DAAMAGE AiMJ 4TR.RP EA;EmEwi; LOT AREA 34.2 AC. . r er- wM xcl®EmovoEDAS ~a;sanr PRIVATE DRIVES 28,900 &F. PUBLIC R/1N 227,194 S.F. i f-lC ivrirv L.t DENSITY - TOTAL PLAT 8.5 UNITS/AC. Bq yt® , DENSITY - LOT 9.59 UNITS/AC R TRAFFIC VOLUME 2,000 ADT r / 7`~ n q n 7 ~r7 q r cprj NUMBER OF UNITS 328 fV(/ .~Ir5t., r r 1(!t ,r Rt 4✓ PRELIMINARY [y( y{'{` NUMBER OF OUTSIDE PARKING 440 .y®_e f4N3ULTING INGIN44RS •mn• 'e+ P P-!®Hi . PtaEO fON: D URY/TOPS KEN APPEj.BA(jM 1 J ILANNERS and LAN S IcsINEEtSINCa °:.'.:e<; ° ° - T AT K AND DAN GusTAFSON CfPflNltf INC. e - s °Jii4a/ 1 O00 EAST 614n ;TREET, NMk3vIl6[, rtkwE;4TA {5537 M 432.3004 OAxOTA COiMTY, ;OTA t l' t t 1 r r 1 ff t+ ti 'i, tJ 1111 , T t -30 0 •50 100 160 t } ~ EGALE 91 FEET J t t ff y. / \ NIKE: 9°mfY VdW[\` a~ J 1 t ~ t a \'•L~~ t r : r r A 1 r r ~ iLLf . -a-... t. r j t rl ~ \ t 1 ~ y.,~~a ~ - 1 t ~ ryy 4 t R T6, lA 0 ~ f 1 rt - - Y R~ ~ tt 1 t 1 ~ i tt rr rCr J it tg { J r 1' ~ d UNITS d UN{TS jt it 6 ~Jrr 1 i f i rr J t J tJ 7 1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN KEN kPPELHkUM p., AND ~ DAN GUSTAFSON CbPflNYf INC. }g; s efaAx. TRC3 OAKS »2!a~ faYA °2 .0 ENT Ix fw ITAEV, NfYflll, Mtxx EtOtd {L31Y iM #'I °I4b6 f ,rf/ f o / r o P r W q C? J - ;~f ffi o i i.y VI ~ t~ 6 a S s t~va ~ I ~g R€ S~ r 4 i ~ T \Q~ J ! . , m ' \ ~ ~ I F Fi t E}~ ~i i S / t . t 3t / rte, N- .E _ 4 . , r a° mn rtw 1 0. +o.,»v.»o ..o,.+.« PRELIMINARY i APPEtBA :408E ++.®~<.>.w s.,> w^•+.oes GRADING, DRAWAGE AND EROSJP . C.:'NTROL PLAN Eb1 4°' CNGtNEEa9NG STRATFORD OAKS _ c"MPRNy INC. } t -=_V ,'qc° rt (j(l~ l~ , •`y}a tit` 4 `~0` - t Y -CAiE4 ] TO ] StOVE4 TO 9E gE30R- WiiH 6lHC,fr:3 OF TOV30R. HO YaiN4ENewCE - - - - a•'` I"` ' / ' ` 'v ' GROUND COYEq •NO MH OOT ]®84 W006 EiBER Bt AwK EP_ Y'P l~ J .e " ypt°sl,'.t '~v `.4)0 ( 6t'nrr! j ! ®f { a tX~4. °50 0 50 100 350 r (.;1 FI 1'' •'J/~ t Jr. ~ tCALE N EEET ,";"r-- hill ~ ~ lI ~ , ,t*~ ~ ; ~ t~ ~ r t tt•, . ob tcE' ~A L f 1 f, (r ~a _1 r 1 ,t~`___-lam { ` jr, r f~ / J , , I tn- ~ IT } 47~.~// i w` I i ~ ,I~ ~ j j/ " 1 -...'~r~-~ e.•_~ `"'-@ }/a f,, ` ~ ` J ~ ,1~`t~'7JtT5 J.-"'!S 013 - , i r " t-I`--."' r •``~•'~s `'N ♦ - - \\~`\4~ - n•-_ •1S'~'~';". ')~i. : - _ .=~~ly wl :-..i jExBime¢} e.,`"+R»' _ _ _ ~ - _ - °e s.. ti.~RTEf IM43 OF //pp pp' coasutPrwo tao~wccns. - PRELIMINARY' ngeanaEOraw: •~:r. 3A,/ g KRHq[A5 ♦rv! t H6 fUgvfiopf GRADING, DRAINAGE AND ERASION CONTROL PLAN KENAaaEiaAUna sE MPRNY, I NC. t) 4 C. - STRATFORD OAKS DAN GUSTAFSON _ RAG- p00 0131 s•iw fiq[[t, hwNiv~ttC. Y,Hw[f6iA 35])i M ai2'i0ap YeL -TA n y i lit s i r r Ty sW yl - ,r o 50 ioa 150 . / / tt s~~ rf. i t i _ r t' tt ~ ~ I` ~ t g a ~b' ~ l lip 1 rti'` l~ ) Ii I { j ~ ~ k~ i, ~ • ~ yam,, ` ru T / : may, r~ r.•~~ 00 j - _ 7 t ~ r f F-'t J I- - ~f r ti r f7 to _ f _ _ J__ • } t a` r ~ scc,ATCS a , C S MANNIXa LNdaS _ PRELIMINARY KAX n~ m3cnA 5 X4A8 and d LAND SBtA KEN V4T6.•\ •q a w.. .v r.mu a,e BEN F'PE`.®Af sl Ca \ - RARING, DRAINAGE AND EROSIC t - 7L PLAN AND Dees UslnvsaN 'Grief Y, INC. ~T~1 s 3 < eA *00 EMT I-#- $MEET. ".MLL1 XiXx C$0SA 43337 M 432 aAX. .1040 ® TF N - 634 Q- . " t~ I g I " e 3 t t M' . f 5 ~ '<t f f C z (VIVANT SCHEDULE '~XISTING TREES t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ e, ~ ~ _t n021DU0!JS ntitFRSTOPY TREES ~ 111 ~ _ ~ I ~ • 4 ~o . NOT INDICATED _ 6, _ ro F . i _ r 5 ~ V b { y _ I b F ✓ ~If ~ ~ ~ ~ m. 9 ~ /hI~ rl• ~ ~ C g C~ Ii 51 . F k ~ i, i 3 ~ r. r l` 4- K } - - LANDSCAPE MASTERF-AN DANAUp eeAUF.+A DAN GUS TAFSON t}t3f ,ENGINEERING STRATFORD OAKS .11111 Ll COMFRNY INC. ~ « RF EvE!ifLB25Y19fl _J I r t a v r LL y e ; r- , e r 4 E r , x v . T _j v e l j t I < r Ea4i ,<5m St CCT, ❑uRwS ,E£. u,a wC30TA S:}3T AH 032 I ~e EnG aw. L2 165' 970 960 8 UNIT BLD. B g a 9 5 0 940 EX. TOV'%L 940.5 SECTION AA 460 290 75' r 950 _ ..y~IT BLD. 16 UNIT BLD - M 1 ! _D. 949.0 953.0 954.0 ~i~40 L42C 930 EX. i VwN,u., - P/L_ h~11 Y lei 20 03 9 380` 185 1 r j 950 .r 940 „ .t 8 UNIT BCD. . 930 d y 920 i 920.5 SECTION CC (f I _ _ l c ~o Fca. i I ~ . ,/~~}~E consvtTixa morn acn~ ~f KEN APPLEBAUM AND 1 2 nL"nnEAS.nd,"nosURVEVOnx' SIGHTLINE ANALYSIS DAN GUSTAFSON C-NGINEERING a I S T RATFORD OAKS 2 "rE5 T acea~PAtt INC. . £R;i 's§^. ~'PE: w, ^'9tt5viltr, u.rrv[SDTt SSJS'. -r ~]2-30C0 ` 2 F . P PLAT IAIL 97, R _ 34.4E ES HriS r :w hs:n~OfJ;:.+'^~ i -N /d.F..r' :.w'~r- a. r SAS- . • • • . ' 30 I LE( I ~ !i B.et ~ xnru[ Yh~ ~ Y M..t W LOT t uz. eac x+w~ 4 ~ 4 Art i r9N 3LOCK 1 Ji1CiYrav „Se 1 t \ \ a RfIELD_ . , , *_00 0 SOO 200 900 ~ncwraLLrFr~ qQ 9 ' 9¢ / 3 3. LEGEND TOTAL PLAT AREA 41.5 AC. NOTE: t>A.+wnc€..roursm[.as[uewra LOT AREA 34.2 AC. we.4 ee rr _v .e re[ecss"wr PRIVATE DRIVES 28,900 S.F. / -I i A d - PUBLIC R/W 227,194 S.F. I vI/-I C, DENSITY TC°',L PLAT 8.5 UNITS/AC. DAy,4OR - , DENSITY - LOT 9.59 UNITS/AC TRAFFIC VOL IE 2,000 ADT n 41 NUMBER OF L _TS 328 /-rL=/~7r~ /c7 L- IV Li ...,y', 1 \ NUMBER OF OUTSIDE PARKING 440 _ PRELIMINARY PLd cc .r «d~ i [rax[ »Q. ~ ~ KEN APPELBAUM ~ T ATFORD Q_ AND DAN GUSTAFSOI: _L114 -0/ ewaaea courrv, ears *00 [ASS to ew 6MEt1, 6wA5M3Via~[, ti,ww[SO'I 1533P M 435-10W t ~I PRELIMINARY L AT THOMAS LAKE A UPGRADE 360.0 F.F. DIFFLEY A UPGRADE - 902.42 F.F. Ntf'H44tE 1H t2.Ht - COUNTY s ROAD. NO. 30 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' d , j S I~ ~ a1I cn. es xh.f..r x ee x m J LOT T 2 Wnt P. lnnse.ee, ( w e ( 4 A (I itch P~e3oe th i ws FAxg kEICWxt, ®eeeMirtf BLOCK 1 / ✓:/-f R. h. r®rorWb Wltt t areot. BLOCK 2 e £ ANEA TAW~Ara« Ilk LA,J,L « 1 DFIAINAGE EASEMENT r X t 7 c' -4- DEERFIELD, LOT t ° / ~ °SOO O SOO 200 300 rPCrxTr rar BLOCK 3 1 p o ~ ~ t " ~rxof l / . Wf Wf Hf c i LEGEND - = / C TOTAL PLAT AREA 44•5 A° iWW'ef 9P-fi 9H tH.]1 ` - 4 B° NOTE: MAIN- AND UTILITY EASE-711 LOT AREA 34.2 AC. WILL IE_D WCESSAAT PRIVATE DRIVES 28,900 S.F. -7-/ - n 4 r r' 7 PL IC R/W 227,194 S.F. t 1-/C iv,/,i,, ^c! --TY -TOTAL PLAT 8.5 UNITS/AC. R-1 El- Df ITY - LOT 9.59 UNITS/AC _ o TR FIC VOLUME 2,000 ACT - ( , All- COO NU ER OF UNITS 328 /v Li _ ~ NUMBER OF OUTSIDE PARKING 44S, CONSULTING 4MI141111 PRELIMINARY PLAN' PNEGMEO E«,: i IQ IjE rtnNN:ni ..a Lano ~unvEEars KEN APPELBAUM I ®IOINEERING STRATFORD AK [rv , DAN GUSTAFSLNi ' ND - _ 1,,1frr MPRNY, INC. L«,.. a. ~1 t of 1 R.. 1000 E j 149% STREET, a I-ILLE° YINNE401A $Snl rN 452-1600 C-oTA CO-Y. WOiA CITY OF EAGAN ...e T _ COMPREHENSIVE _i .A D. < PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMEND.1"sEMT. PRELIMINARY .Asa T$ AND LOCATION: APPLIC`E`Ff - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY q .,i ~_.,Y(MOa P (aAGN Hi 5'_ i/ 1,11.:zi COMMERCIAL 3;<-0..f jJ , 82-2 DATE OF PUDLEC HEARING: MARCH 24, 19W3 SiA., PEP09TED BY: IF REPORT: M11:3~~4. H 5,17, ° Ci8Eli` ENGINEERING >h PPL E C L C : , 100 Za.':S Adj. ~ 1. 'Pit a_ 2_.. t d C,?~!; Q.d 1, i.. V y 2 PIVW, z wodll ~ z i i 0,40 Z LAND USE: In 190, Fadamil Land cK31nilly started the Pinmind Developnent procoon Co-, ^ , Q Ko r' WL_ Park. From 1992 u3nn in tie AErnnxient is a w i , _ o_ 4, the WC s s _ :t 1 n. in r 7 Y L ~ 1,.. nvP Aar _'o. n _..s o F t the _ site a_ i~2e i.. i x e_ Planned A: C `J L< Din .,oI ,~aC _y portion of 10 _O~. M,_a .1 Jam. _ nt to r t, ivea1'71 29 .`v P.., ,_r__ l s_r _ ,r_ -_L L'^ _pcrS,~"r_mcrtts, Du _..`a _ 17 }rLs -:-ir! _s_..- dI'LL 'l ;iri -anl, s are _ - to _n.. wi ..i. ,13m E,_I It's ,d;? _ u s e and E,rl Pant LIT! ca WKn3s or Office - - uses. Pic propnnpA , i , 4ould rim; nonsist of one ax_ 3. =1;- Town C-r.a'. i1 i pp1_na cantor 1ni h h i partially 1, _1--.:.a _ mould ,tom., _ tr:'r " . ows _ Its _r_ 1 ;1al e„ _ `TQ Town C ,r1,., Pr e. in revinj d of _ s _ _ ~ .-'r w , r t - 015 vqopi~s I C34CA S151 as Parcel 1. YG Owns 1 lan 1 1 i jW usc Lee nq 1 )Ink a-,- 1a:_a J. _ n a SITE 1404 r ht° , ,j _ ana- i n . 10002 ll.1 invapy" P CO _ nm 1 Nil _ in 7 , i' _ - * ti_. hr,suA3 if „ , -;i ; y svo-y l - 1. 1v [~n J3,- ,e» Me 7popos-d e QGnn7n c ' or o`, . _ noon m~c. of SO! in q W. tr >T, L _ 0, „ c 3 UP-Me - _ ire 5-an prnq a 117323. ~ y was 1 I _ _ JF plan ,-7..i,li only ?L ` i~`, do'_ dill` is _ iry Wes alor. property the _ Q more 1 in '+U of concrete 0 . t>._er; s b u i A tI Lng and o?,,„ aoznqnq _lnrge, a. Ate- _iL~__,_ i p_ ii'.t J?" s or A plaited in steel g'ci L__~ dpi,. vLsuaVy o,. n thin T= a ; hird Ago area. N,_ ,A_N"~C IS CONTROL: _ , vJ ~ _ _ a_ _ - campiw3n n c, q , , ' ' _ _ s i t e 7 l _ n', at ~10 Ms is T, his v _ storm sewer s n.. will _ w.., y ~ rwpov~! 1 c icnin in w T TT'T E sower _ _ _ _ - l - no the - . M ' t c ?na ''L to e e r line in Denmark Avonan. a.1 ` o ._c in T;1a1. Connie Drive i-A 0 z c w s has been _ t., Wenjuave number of Eire hVaranns to Toot Mtv Ufa japlml _e sent. ST_ , -.,TV :1'.5 MI :\l_ .ter t `JL; m Public t.' 'LC"" s i .`r y 7 sion r r located whace possible. E S,_,. _ S; 1, iii _b s ba' _ _MIz S: Cross 1., ..m _.W will W - T~P_ LJ -i _.rJ r i AU he t 1, ~ .'_'._t rDM2 _ s.. o w 33.r i.' n_ c. OY. a l t ` i i s constructed L - c'..; sncve more Sufficient riqnt-of-way Eor Denmark Avenuo and Town Centre Drive with a.a _ - l 70 and Town Mitre 100 DeveLopments. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquicad within the a pp '-i i ai- s time 1 ms 1 caquPwl 5Y a.. lVact 1- ASSESSMENTS: in accuriance wit! speciaL assossment policies in e t - e A . L sil e of the J_ a < _L assessment hearing. the E ? L .".Y in _7 assessments have Keen 10VAeK Watin tw e C a MY racirls sbow the following pend&3 of record: PROj DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT 443 - 512 scraer -S n s 23,193 in accordance with spacial asspsSmunL POACKS in eftact at this - a p, _ r- 429 Worm Sewer Lateral $L,177/Ac. 7.98 Ac. S 9,392 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 1 9,392 All final assessment oblicaolons will be calculated Vnoca on quanKtias n with the rates in affect at the time of the final ptat approval. CONDITIONS: TOWN CENTRE 100 SIXTA These Mandard conditions of plat approval as minpt od "um"! Al, > 3 F t.`, 2y B4, C2, K!, A, p lit, A, an."_A t r. updated t:' --r n.,c'f, de`J< < T.(r_ i. a',. an that ilcsa_7.)oraT M ad 1 :y ,C' Sunni I. t. MY- 3. All lunnin skall be contained within the bujljmw4. A ma i m pnnm~a nqrwamepl and crosn km~pmc"t n ~hz 1 1 ho rovi ow(- by 7 l` City At , n t c c A3 shall r m r F- S foriamcs are requested. All sLqnnqe shall be subject to th i ai?o Sian i i_ w /S _ 8. All tour sides of the MAW= ghill no consir"mad with thc, imalwylal9. All sitp runoff is required to drain to Pond DP-23. Appropr water main 12"Pinq is mquirod, STANDARD C Mi aT ° ::fie O PEAT P WAL A T% T . This . ° e LL)'IL__nr shall accapt its assessment ablicianions as datined in the accoMonce with the firHil plat dimensions and the races 1 B. Easements and t_t; h7. a1. m..c3. i6 i a _ d e, , , - La private C. eu t Ty o _ u_ . g n° _ way , development h L _ aea skar& or- t]"" acquIsItIon cusns o'] additional a ~Ta t c~ r C n _ d ev_ n + ,t ? _.T? a, Ws of this p La L or nuT i service f This development shall de all public 4 _'L' LeiA:p _aLy s.:.tpo easements E A _._t1 tai`_e development of adjacant- roadways as required by tba appropriate, .Ac it-_ agency. 4 This developuhnnL shall and" nd n- ease~anzA va c -r nacessitatea by Aty storm water storage voiume .ts.. C. Plans and Specifications , lm Alh public streets and utilities service to T. by a oraoistered professional enqinaer in accordance wLth City z _ .Pa onginourAyl t and approved by staff prior to final p a.. approval. m detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment prepared conLrol plan must be accordance with c.rat°n9 final City standards and ai?provod by staff prior to approval. public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accarlance "with City engineering scandards. detailed 4. A laniscape p the- proposed plan and grading appruved by staff prior to the final p l a t approval. The financial . guarantee shall ~ include(l in the Development Cant--ract an,~ not. z_l.s one year after tit'., date of inst.._b., l-ati_n. STANDARD CONDMONS OF PLAT APPRMAI, PAGE TWO uo nr ~ uc L, the , _ Law _ waz ov_.__ E. ParmAs, 1_ 1 1. T' i F-• t F. Parks Dedicatio'' i P l (A. Other i r :ouY _ .1_ act i.on~ AaVLS-_ _ nn<< q Commission Ci~y ua t Approved: Aw"sn 25, 1917 S~ntcmb~r 15, lqn-,, ..ail J STANDARD QUARRY MK L , ~ ~ ~ ~ Mn 'emu / AGE KNOB Iv r r , r a- ! 4- r ~ '1t~,' 7 r` 1 7777 c I it ' - I r ~ a ec \N ` ` ~`~~m 1 ; ~ nw .~fi2 ,tV) Lf~ \ newrt .wx~_ f 111 ,1 \ ~`+'1~-1.~~ ✓ yG~" l { ~ I'~i ~ I °~.l \ ~ tAUfctY• ft«a Y~ tY3. t.n .o ec. Y nozo9 rrer_xzt cca3r-[v ~^exr.s a t ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ / t 3. E k i S}. Sll w €t, t. 16633 urM EK RJS~ of ra I, iI) 1. ` °4,../ .at1 . t. n15t9 a ri• •t '~`S. nl t~~ ~Slia / Ym♦1® ®YOC# >4 t T.9n331 .cc.a Ch tl d3~Q eacoM a ~ aas Mra. oa atauc~ 5s ..a I~ F i~ ~ \ ~ t• J{S'la} r[ m13633 !w u LOU nn --t t - 4YC]J1ZTS +u>' c}p, vnn .a tc. .r........ ac~.. bYi Kt w ul po.at o r~~ t t •c lid, Fi 3z4O° Preliminary plot " ses Tos•w ~ ~ TOWN CENTRE coo SIXTH ADDITION ~ ~ "'ty ~ ~ ~ BOEYHA YE LA,~'D SLY ss-'~ - Bay ~ [%ht xZ[_x'S eae:.tt*Y VGI w aa.a t~`s..~e~eew W r !M~ EX1-11 :3?~~' "B" W J rr- 10 _ t(4 - - =)j d:9 L Y j a,' a T R r,.I . iF a L„" a u4. ~ t ~ ~ i7l tt % .a *as,a ~ - r~` S I U81NE$Q ~ °•L°. Rt1L f ` ~ xh1.•'It~I.I , -uvr.°,..w. ,T~'T w'(t++~:~~P °fu `,~#11~ ~ Y C ~ i i..a*a[c.$ fj/ arcs r.,~ac as, t ~ x ®1 t ,aa`i,,.ccs u•ay ~ ~'i`ED B~tBIN 68 c. c n,. -.a„a,w Usa o,+•Ct TlvJ at) ~ r ~ ~ ~x yy , d l 3. • w.,s r 'tea w,r s ; CD 11 EL^► rr<ra®aa farm. Y) P ~ i ~ ° 7 %...w • • - I B 1 ~ S 8 ~ v ...m r®~ 1 -10 PROPOSED S rcH PLAN N : Frrov 1 . EAG AEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK A PLAN` E 7 tINIT.A£VELOPMEN2 `L BY THE- at.,,a FEDERAL LAND COMPAN'Y LOCATEA Ui IL rw..®r..a:arw.u. ar ~pYA4 Gi .SG L/9 aJ0 tJ $C. -/.IG /1~. C'a.r>e-~.r z®.✓.~G U.c-rte f3c r.sro cs c ~ F}C.. Q..a .re-xJr Zo.✓ c~G fC S~ONwLED MTEA9ECTiC J - l J Kf sP ru, o- JLJ /cI 4 0:, ~1 T EAGAN TOWN CENTRE aKr uEn t ~~~e _ .a k' CONCEPT FAN 170 ACRE RETAIL COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT NTEA1EGPtgM ' _ . DEVELOPER FEDERAL LAND C0MPAA3Y 17 4'~C 7 9~ 4c2~s a~ ~sG usE o rs 7.yE~f~~acc O r' L ~.•-=.3, rrl, 3US ~.,~~°c _ •'r s s ..9 x e~c.r E?~c,+rr3,,..i 6 E' W /TiY ~L>Q/»n.<-i/3 rs X92 e'AS. oa Ei.~3>c~L CG.9SSiFics7r d~ Zon/i✓nS. 3+ Town Centre Rive t, - Toy a s' ~7T-,- t i ;s ~ Q a -III, 11U ~~I111 1!:-! Ij j !-I H"'.. t" Y ;r, I 0 77- _ - F~ - N o° a twit - s• ON, Pr 'T DATA JM- Site: 347,705 s.f. (7.4$ acres) Bu ea: 69,900 s.f. t-la Ig: 7 Stalls Tc ovided: 393 Stalls a r SITE PLAN r. «r t , Fit A FEDERAL LAND GOI'PA1_ ! RETAIL DEVELOPMENT I I w a t _ a r ~e~ x r~ I r* a _ _ O -A +V i 1 ITt I 9 M //J \ i its j i IF I /~j//~` . ~ . ~ ~~I 1 vim.: , • I vq d P v y ( v rMT Z A A $ n X61 i %,la3} CTl ~ ~a•z4 asgr ~ wr "~iA ~ o~~ 'AA87 e,~ g~o:mr~dr'B d f S Eac ~ a$=~r cg~~ J/ 51 p~ p is "A = r'°~ a a ~ ►:'E XM Eq it anGGEE:d~s X553 R8 q~ „ ~ .E~ e`n _ ~t°~G~r ~36 6 7 a 8;m a t D P-27 ,684.5 r' - Is' DFD' 66 C P - 3~ 8T8.0 857.3ji DP CP 5 5 841.9 `N 8 850.5 v ~E -873t?,- _ 866.5E ~I td ' ( .875 9 ~ M- DP-5 85.5'.4 DP-/26 DP - 4 c °,74 8 1 '874.8 L.S.-7 " f 0 S rQ i r~r`)Et,S i - Jl j1 A~+ _ rn~'~'•-~I R848.( D-r li -20 DP ;F~h o. 901.0 N;tiT~ A r TOh v, ~N 904. DP-7 o f ~ s 0 2~a I• -7 ii ti G~/ J '12 r j- 12' r, P.LP~ 6 8900 8800 CETERO. C'~~slw~ y~.ti Cr 5' tf:3 C 1 't * j 892 0 ill' JP 3 _t~- 67, z ' , - 8440-~L I l 8710.~ 5' -1}'? JP-2'` ,~2w; Bitr iF rih 8800- 7888.7 4t~ 844.0 x.9015 JP-62' ,z X97, rrrt(SK ~`=s 893.0 8 51.5 ; ~ r 8955 JP~15 t u 49. F i's $ 1 6~ ti cv`~ - / S.- i JP-63 JP- :LK ~a I2- 899.7 24844.T~ 5; JP-II 900.7"~8g6: 815.7 _ JP-44 830.0 JP-5 jE 890.7 _ . 9 823 8 v 834 _ rv r _ 48 A 8207.8 / - - - - r' 830.0 f k i . K J-f JP-6 cr. BP-28 818:9 EE26 $30.0 JP-49 a FIG#1 -71 city approved : Standard plate : PUBLIC y WORKS DEPARTMEtd MASTER PLAN n