05/05/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
MEMORANDUM
O: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN V , DIRECTOR O PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE. MAY 3, 1988
E: MAY S, 198COMMISSION MEETING
The first of the Commission's pre-commission meeting tours is
scheduled for Thursday evening beginning at 6:30 P.M. We will
leave the municipal center at 6:30, o to Blue Cross/Blue Shield
followed by Carnelian and Northview Parks. It is anticipated we
will return to the municipal center just prior to a 7.30 start of
the regular agenda for the Commission.
After approval of the minutes of the April meeting, and the
agenda, it would be appropriate for the Commission to review the
Consent Agenda items and development proposals.
Under new business, the first item is the proposed development of
Winkler Park. A separate packet item is contained concerning
this particular item for your review. It appears that the
neighborhood is in agreement with the park design and layout
other than that for an open skating area for winter use. i'bzi>
item has had some discussion i the neighborhood recently and
appears that residents of the neighborhood will be present to
present their views.
The first item under new business pertains to Northview Park and
the irrigation of the three new softball fields. Again, Staff hll:_,
prepared a separate memorandum covering this particular item and
will provide additional information at the Commission meeting on
Thursday evening.
Item under new business is a request from a resident to operate
a "traveling concessions" in Eagan parks this summer. A
memorandum has been prepared outlining this request. Staff has
also received additional information from other communities
pertaining to the operation of vending carts in other
communities' parks systems.
The third and final item under new business is the winter program
report. Dorothy Peterson, Recreation Supervisor has althored
this report and it is presented for your review. Dorothy will be
making a few brief comments concerning the report and sharing
with you some staff concerns as well as problem resolutions from
this year.
PARKS DEVELOPMENT
Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan will bring thr
Commission up to date on two of the more t~ _zfica-r~~- cont~ in
1987 and will provide you with background or. r.i-t
proposed shelter building at Thomas Lake Park. idd openin,4 w,-,s
originally scheduled for May 2, 1988 but has now b,--c--n extendcd to
May 9, 1988. Not available for submission with this packet is
information pertaining to Ohmann Park. Although the Advisory
Commission has previously approved the design for the park, Staff
had hoped to provide the Commission with cost estimates for the
first phase development. Because of the work load of the
department, we are unable to do so at this time. We would like
to raise, as an issue for discussion, feasibility of irrigating
the soccer fields within the park, a portion of which would be
provided for in the construction contract.
Under the Community Center project, Staff will bring the Advisory
Commission up to date on the architectural selection process an-
program writing that has been continuing since the la-a
Commission meeting.
There are four items under other busir nd ~ts. An
attachment has been provided showing the bond i- nd p __utout of
March 31, 1988. Included with your packet is the consult
report on the Art Park Concept. Staff has not prepared a rrF~-rr~
or summary and is providing it without comment at this ti-Me.
Dorothy Peterson will update the Commission on the Eagan Athletic
Association and Rosemount Area Athletic Association's Facilities
Committee and ongoing talks to merge, or work cooperatively, in
providing youth activities.
Finally, the last remaining item is Department Happenings at the
back of this packet.
AGENDA
ADVISORY RECREATION O ISISO
MINNESOTA
EAGAN, Thursday, a , 198
6:30 P.M.
Eagan Municipal Center
:30 P.M. Tour of Blue Cross] le Shield, C---, l.L r:
orie Parks
B. 7:00 . Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center
C. Call to Order an Pledge of Allegiance
D. Approval o - - - a
E. Approval of mutes o the Regular Meeting o April 7, "
F. Tree City .S. . Award eve
G. Consent Agenda:
(1) Potts Addition - en Potts
(2) Ridge avers a °.ition - Haven prises
(3) Eagandale * Lake 3rd dait:..on - Opus
Corporation/$to_ *_h ern Mutual rife
(4) Sill Addition - Michael Sill Education
Alternatives, Inc.
Development Proposals:
Alden on Addition - Rosewood Corporation
(2) Unisys Par Addition - Unisys Corp./City if igan
I. old Business:
(1) Winkler Jackson
J. New Business:
(1) othview a Irrigation - ark Development
( Traveling Concessions - Request
inter Program Report
(4) Trust Fun
K. Parks Development:
(1) Tennis Court Contract - 87-2
(2) ark Building Contract - 7-13
Thomas La Par Building Contract - 8-18
(4) Ohmann Par - Status Report
L. Community Center Project:
(1) Architect Selection date
(2) Program Writing
(3) Philosophical Foundation for Fees and C.arcp:.
other Business and Re]-- :
(1) on Fun - 13 j
(2) r Par i . - Consultant's Report
(3) Update o ERA/,L au., Facilities committee
(4) Department a wis
Adjournment
Subs ,c, o app 2yal
MINUTES O_ UI : TI OF
THE ADVISORY PAR rO a ION
, MINNESOTA
APRIL , 1988
A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks anc
Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. on Thur. d'a pt it++_ 7,
1988 with the following commission Members
Carroll, Michele Swanson, Wayne Sames,Sandy l r~~„,3
George Kubik and JoAnne Alt. Staff present incl,ded rectcl t
Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect/P~-_-r~-"
Planner, Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLin(J:-;
Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson and Parks Secretary,
Cherryl Mesko. Commission Member not present was David .Hennes.
AGENDA
A motion was made by Porter, seconded by Sames with all
co?erabers voting in favor to accept the agenda as presented.
MINUTES MARCH , 1988 MEETING
With the deletion o Wayne Sames attending the March I
meeting, Sandy Masin moved, JoAnn Alt seconded, with all .;.>r.
voting in favor to accept th-'~ March minutes as z m }nded.
MINUTES FOR -6, "ING
Bob Porter moved, Wayne Sames seconded with all members
voting in favor to accept the minutes of the March 26, 1988
special meeting as presented.
CONSENT AGENDA
The following consent agenda items T. r :ed for
approval. On a motion by Dick Carroll, secur, _ r? 3_ q r_ubik,
with all members voting in favor, the Commissi_n approved
recommendation to the City Council of the following items:
1. COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION - That this plat be
subject to a cash dedication requirement.
. CRYSTAL PONDS - That this plat be subject to a cash
dedication requirement.
3. EAGANDALE CENTER - 20TH ADDITION - That this plat be
subject to a cash dedication requirement consistent
with commercial/ industrial property and a trail be
placed along Lexington Avenue.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Coir-i_ i n
Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting
Page 2
4. DAN BAR COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - That wh 5
permit be subject to a cash dedication ~c~yzi~mt -t
consistent with the City's commercial an 11dusur:' 1
policy.
5. OLSON ADDITION That this plat be subject to a h
dedication requirement for the newly created lot 1
that an 8 foot bituminous trailway be placed along R< Z
Road.
6. HOSFORD ADDITION ° That this plat be subject t
dedication requirement and a 5 foot concrete"
be placed along Deerwood Drive.
7. WHISPERING OAKS - 4TH ADDITION - That this plat be
subject to a cash dedication requirement.
O IE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL
Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan outlined for
some background information relative to the middle "'ol
He reminded the Commission that they had previously ie4 e t"-
High School/Middle School site, although they only made -i
recommendation regarding the High School portion of the athletic
fields.
The proposed plan shows the addition of 3 baseball fields
with soccer field overlays, a free standing baseball and a
football/track facility which lie directly soutl; of the Northview
Athletic Complex. The original utility plan direct storm
water outlets at the south edge of Northview Park. Mr. Sullivan
asked Tom Wilson from School District 196 if he could elaborate
on the updated information relative to this utility plan since
Staff had some concerns regarding the potential for erosion
caused by the water draining o the site. Tom WilArln indicated
that the school district has been working very closely with City
Staff and would re-route the piping to the sati~.vi:n of the
engineering department.
Dick Carroll questioned if the re-routing would cross over
the existing tree farm close to Northview Athletic and Director
Vraa explained that the tree farm will be removed for the
proposed tennis courts adjacent to Northview Park.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 3
Tom Wilson explained that School DiE`--riot 196 , ourr :1Ur
.a u a„
meeting with Dakota County regarding th punt of
would allow on Diffley Road. Currently w.. are the present time the County does not want to consider anot'-Cs,
the School District will continue working with th .o try to
accommodate the entrance/exit flow for the buses. Tom Wilson
further explained that they are thinking of having an access to
the school property from iline Drive which will bring
emergency vehicles along the left side of the property to the
center of the complex.
Member Carroll asked if it was known what percc-.-O --a-1r, -the
grade dropped from the oval track to the first ball 'i nd.
Steve Sullivan indicated he wasn't sure at this time but could
find out.
Bob Porter moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members
voting in favor to accept the platting as presented regarding the
athletic fields and facilities and allow the water ,.-Jr.-off to be
negotiated between the School District and the City.
BRIDLE RIDGE - 2 ADDITION
Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan introduced
the Commission to Rick Packard from Sienna Corporation who then
elaborated on the proposals requested for Bridle Rid 7e 2nd
Addition. Mr. Packard reviewed some background info.._,aa=-ion
stating that this 2nd Addition would incli-de a 251 lot
subdivision that would be devel-L : it - y stages. The
current proposal includes 49.47 loc_X: k the original
Eagan Hills Farm PD, the 25.95 acre 'all pr+p.,.gty and 91.57 acres
located west of Bald Lake. The 91.57 acre parcel had not been
reviewed previously by the Commission and has not, as yet,
fulfilled its parkland dedication.
Mr. Packard stated that as a result of the curr.,,,,t the
would dedicate Park #3 to fulfill the remain_ig par=land
dedication requirements for the Eagan Hills PD and r also wish
to convey and receive parkland credit for a 2.2 greenway
from Bald Lake to orhview Road. This greenway is --ithin the PD
limits but was not included initially a parkland. Finally,
Sienna wants to dedicate 6.85 acres within Parcel A which
includes Bald Lake and its southern shoreline.
Mr. Packard's comment regarding the proposed c:_
trail link was that he felt it would better be posit-.oi_ _n the
existing parkland area that had been dedicated.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting
Page 4
Member Carroll expressed his concern in putting the trail on
the west side of the property because of the steep incline.
Parks Planner Sullivan explained that if the trail is placed on
the west side of the property the plat can be revised to
accommodate a wider trail link and the steep slopes on the west
side as well. Mr. Sullivan also stated he felt the continuous
trail on the north side of the property would be L,r^_>Lit.
Issue #2 was addres,:>< d by Steve Sullivan r
parkland dedication of .65 -:.,ores of shoreline south o- E~? tl T,70 _e
(approximately 250 lin. feet) and 6.25 acres on ponaing area
(Bald Lake). Steve stated that the Commission is basically
dealing with shoreline since the Comprehensive Park System Flan
does not acknowledge Bald Lake for recreational intent. :Til
Porter stated his preference would be to have the d- _ a
utility easement over the lake donated with no v
parkland. Wayne Sames asked if, in the event the l
donated are the lot lines extended to the center of the 1 +
then a drainage utility easement placed over the water; to '_r2
Steve Sullivan answered yes.
Issue #3 concerns Park 3 in which the greenway provide.; a
continuous trail link in conjunction with the Eagan Hills Fauin
PD. During the Eagan Hills Farm PD review th_ C~7TY~~E_~>~_~~
required that all ponding areas within greenwa--
water level, allow pedestrian passage. Steve Sul'
that the plat be reviewed and revised to provide fc rcc_ c? i x
corridors above the high water levels within this park.
Issue 4 reflects the developers request for transfer of
parkland from Parcel A to the 25.95 "Hall" property. Although
the Hall property has fulfilled its parkland dedication as part
of the Eagan Hills Farms PD, Sienna Corpora'-.ion is r westing
partial transfer of parkland dedication regvir nts to ,_el A.
As the phases are platted, the parkland fee_ 11 be - __t the
then current rate. Wayne Sames questioned if there was any
precedent for this situation to which Director Vraa responded
negatively. JoAnn Alt questioned the difference in time for
developing this parcel if the Commission allows the transfer.
Rick Packard responded that it could take 2 - years. Mr.
Packard continued by stating that Sienna does not currentlt own
the Hall property but the first phases to be developed are .,'I
and east with the Hall property being developed last once iz
acquired.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting
Page 5
With most of the background information provided and
questions answered, Chairman Carroll brought each issue before
the Commission individually and the following actions wer,- taken:
1. Sandy Masin moved, Dick Carroll seconde+' v ill
members voting in favor to grant the dev_14_ I
partial park dedication credit for the greenwa
Northview Park Road and Bald Lake as follows:
a. onding area and lake - no credit
. 25% credit based on all land above the high
water level of the pond.
C. 100% credit for all land with less than 12%
slopes.
2. Dick Carroll moved, George Kubik seconded with a]'J
members voting in favor to accept an 8 foot
bituminous trail link as recorded in staff
recommendation.
3. Sandy Masin moved, George Kubik seconded all
members voting in favor that the revision of tic plat
to provide additional width abc the high 1
for a trail connection within Id Lake/N( s c?
greenway be resolved by a joint ing bey y, F t
and developer.
. Sames moved, Alt seconded with all members voting in
favor to use the 25% figure for partial park dedication
for the .65 acres of shoreline abutting Bale Lake.
5. Carroll moved, Sames seconded with all voting
in favor to accept a cash park dedication tribution
on the remaining lots.
. Kubik moved, Masin seconded with all members voting in
favor that there be a joint review by developer and
staff to see if a continuous trail link can go through
Park 3 above the high water level of the pond and if
not, the trail may need to move.
Chairman Carroll commented on his apprehension ing the
legal documentation necessary for the park dedicatii transfer
from Parcel A to the Hall property. His concern way that this
should not be an open ended agreement. Director Vraa stated that
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of rill, 1988 Meeting
Page 5
this document would be drawn up when the develop = I,-. r_, i
the owner of the Hall property, as wel' as sub
that parcel, would be bound to the r - nt "tea " 11 1 i a
dedication. Rick Packard continued _---tine t ~~a
agreement could be amended to delete t Hall property
agreement. Ken Vraa asked if the property would be shown as
described to which Mr. Packard responded yes; it will not be
shown as a lot or an outlot but with a separate legal
description.
Member Kubik requested that staff look i3
aspects of a transfer of this type. Bob Porters rn
about starting a trend and opening up the optic®a - _.r __±=r
in this fashion to developers in general.
7. With all discussion finished, George Kubik moved, Way--,2!
Sames seconded with all members voting in favor
approve the transfer subject to the stipulation 45:.];v
this was based on an individual request along
City's past association with the "Leveloper
not be viewed a setting a st-- -°-d ~ r u
transfers and that this transfe
conforming with all legal requireaznts.
8. Wayne Sames moved, Dick Carroll seconded with all
members voting i favor to have the developer provide a
cash contribution for park dedication.
George Kubik noted for the record that the r i of
credit allowed for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition 1- Ot Set. a
precedent and is based on this individual situatici n :_viewed
as such.
STAFFORD OAKS
Parks Planner Sullivan reviewed the proposal for Stafford
Oaks Addition to rezone 1.9 acres of R°-2 within Thomas Lake
Heights Addition to a planned devel pment district and an
amendment to the Eagan 40 P for 328 4al rn4t-. Mr. Sullivan
explained that the current proposer yurcr_ i 1.9 acres in
addition to the 32.1 acres that they are cure tly developing.
The parkland dedication obligation for the 32.1 acre parcel is
pending and the purchased 1.9 acres has previously fulfilled its
parkland dedication requirement as part of the Thomas Lake
Heights Addition. The developer is requesting credit for the
proposed recreation facilities they are planning for their 328
rental units.
ADvisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7,1988
Page 7
Member Sames asked if there had been a
other developers regarding this issue. Mr.
in January, 1987 the issue was raised with
Addition. Sandy Masin indicated that historic
did not issue credit for recreation facility '
further explained that we have required play
be supplied in some cases and the rationale e_
some complexes only provided what they absolut azi: a
credit was used as a incentive to get more ni' uilt '=mot a
development like this.
Sandy Masin stated that if a credit is given there should
some way the maintenance can be monitored to insure the equip
is kept in good working order rather than allow it to b,, rui
down. Wayne Sames thought there should be consistent
for quality and maintenance. Member Masin asked if
the use of a credit to building the recreation facil`ito P
City's standards and specifications.
Bob Porter indicated his desire to see the develor-r's
layout of what they are proposing i they are asking a
credit. Wayne Sames questioned the legal ramifications of
changing the policy based on individual requests.
Chairman Carroll questioned if it would be bet_Er
credit based on a dollar amount or a percentage
Porter suggested giving one dollar amount and have il i 1n -
the entire area. The Commission discussed different opti.is in
setting the credit but did not want to have this useu as a
precedent for future developments.
Dick Carroll moved, based on the amenities reflected in the
packet documentation, to give $6,000 towards all the
developer proposes to install and encourage developer
strong maintenance and upkeep standards. Bob Porten
motion and all members voted in favor.
Dick Carroll noted for the record that the Commission's
action was a one time decision based o specific development
needs of this specific situation.
George Kubik moved, Bob Porter seconded wi:h al'
voting in favor to give the developer credit for 1.° .cr,: r1 .24
units) towards the park dedication responsiilit' .
JoAnn Alt moved, Michele Swanson seconded with al" _.s
voting in favor that the developer provide a trail alony iias
Lake Road and County Road 30 and a cash dedication.
Advisory Parks an F ion r -or,
mutes of April 7, Meetii.,
Page 8
RAHN PARK
Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works pr-xiod the.
Commission with the background information relative to the Rahn
Park Trunk Storm Sewer Improvement project. Since issue
has been before the Commission in the r. Cc'_' it
was important to bring them u to date on ',.hat has tz,; d and
the reasons this issue is again in front of the Commis ic..
During the construction of Cedar Cliff 2nd there were
growing water levels i the ondin area (Pond AP-50) thlt did
not have an outlet. The two existing office buildings x,but
the west side of Pond AP-50 are subject to flooding due to rising
water levels in the pond.
In January, 1986 a feasibility report v- )r,~:pared looking
at various alternatives. One alternative loc. 1 at running an
outlet north from the pond through the low part of Rahn Park and
opposite Rahn school to carry the water.
A second alternative which was previously preferred,
suggested that with the development of Cliff LaT'J-, "alle:: the
possibility existed to run the line through a p - m`n
the property directly east of AP-50, which is _ ral
Land, and follow through across Rahn to Cliff Li__ The
rezoning of this particular piece of property was d+n°_ed thus the
City was leery to proceed with this alternative.
A third alternative would require an easement from the
property owner east of P-50 to run a line parallel rith Cliff
Road and north on the west side of Rahn Road, crol-,,, _r/-'ad to
the east side of Rahn. At the hearing, the t1he sand
did not want to grant the easement and refuses, to ally Ta the
draining to occur across his property.
Because of the significant cost to consider running the line
parallel to Cliff east and parallel to Rahn north until it could
tie in with Pond P-25 it was felt the best alternative at the
present time both in time and money would be the first
alternative in which the outlet to Pond AP-50 will be constructed
through Rahn Park into Pond AP-49.
Mark Hanson from onestroo osene Anderlik Associate
present to further clarify the concerns and questions he
Commission had relative to wanting to implement the thrid
alternative which would run the trunk storm sewer thr(-" the
Rahn Park area from Pond P-50 to Pond AP-49. AP-49 is tle .end
in Rahn Park property and south of AP-49 is AP-50 which s the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 9
flooding area that affected the Cedar Cliff 2nd Addl,_tiO",. r;,d
AP-26 collects run-off from 56 acres and then runs I c
Pond AP-25 will collect all the run-off from thy: :.f
Galleria site. There is some sensitivity to Pond AP-2 near R<'_n
Elementary school since the elevation is 883.5 and the corner of
the adjacent ballfield is 885, however there is only a 1.5 foot
bounce in the pond.
In pursuing the course of running the line through the I
Park area from Pond AP-50 to Pond AP-49, whic] would air: I
15" pipe from area to area, there would be a ~0
of the oak trees in the park area.
If the line was run east on Clif kr_o ,1 and north on jRahn
along the proposed realignment the cost would be signifim-rit'y
more. For example, the difference in running the li-e Y.r>>
Rahn Park versus parallel to Cliff Road and Rahn, wcrA1"~"
$701000. Another consideration the Ci'_-,r has is t' in
along Cliff and Rahn some of the cuts Es muc°r 0 "
cuts on the Federal Land property acts .,,roximut y 2 f,
the park area would require very little cutting.
Member George Kubik expressed his concern that the
Commission was again being asked to give up park area to meet
needs of others. Wayne Sames asked Director Vraa if there ivu~> a
plan to do trails through the woods at Rahn Park. Director Vra
indicated the process was more preservation at this poi-_ Ind
that there were no plans at this time to develop trails
location.
Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan ad _
the ponding water in the park as it relates to the loss of t:
He indicated there was not a significant impact on the exit3uing
ponds noting that one had a 1-3 foot bounce which is a natural
bounce and the other had a 1-6 foot bounce which will gcv into
the poplar succession first and then move into t-, W ds.
The area surrounding Pond AP-49 will need to 10 J
determine the impact on the trees after the hiyl is
shown. The department will have to review tl-c- i it
presents itself. As part of the trunk storm sewer project the
affected trees can be selectively eliminated.
Steve Sullivan stated that Pond AP-26 has fl oo~
ballfield in Rahn Park but a dike with a flap gate was
which seems to have helped the situation to dew :v~
possibility exists that a 27" extension E,. to ~T",
bring the water from AP-26 to AP-49 ancl t._ai6 =_,ould 10c ,r;later date.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting
Page 10
Member Dick Carroll indicated that some times it's better to
do what is good for the City versus what is good for an
individual department. He questioned if Mr. C~11,,( rt would
recommend adding a 27" line from AP-26 to .nTI-49 t °hi 'n
time. Ken Vraa stated it was L l ard to tell i
at this time, however, it cc:c a ]c.E =)e an i n t a te.
Mr. Colbert stated that the co:--,t to the }ark Department would be
$30,000 to run this 27" extension.
George Kubik commented that it appears as though vl),,= are
substituting park maps for pond maps. He asked Mr. O-Jlrcl-, t-t if
they would consider replacing some of the trees that <<;- a
destroyed/remove during the construction of t', +-rt~r;,
sewer line. Mr. Kubik suggested a small miti r
replacement if the Commission decides to move t ~r?,>
proposal. Mr. Colbert stated that he felt the departi, z-~ r-_ts could
work closely in insuring that the area would be resto9-od as much
as possible and would make a concentrated effort to insure that
occurred.
Mr. Colbert was questioned as to the trerr-;h Width.
for the piping. He stated the rule of thumb i- `aa
twice as wide as it is deep, i.e. if the pipe t
15 feet deep the trench width would be 3 feet.
Dick Carroll moved, based on the significant financial
impact, to accept the proposal for trunk storm sewer improvement
Project No. 452 as outlined on Page 45 of the Commission's packet
and recommend that the 27" line from Cedar Cliff Addition n+_v be
done at this time with a mitigation program for hardwood -rr ,
construction restoration and enhancements surrounding th^ p- i,
area. The motion was seconded by Wayne Sames with al
voting in favor.
George Kuic noted for the record that this action is not to
be viewed as setting a precedent and the decision is based solely
o this individual situation and was reviewed as such.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 11
CENTER TOWN 100 - SIXTH ADDITION
Steve Sullivan reminded the Commission they had n r,-v cci_a Lly
reviewed this parcel at the time of the Eagan Heights - I'Cial
Parks P.D. The parks dedication has bf?nn fulfil-1 The
trails/sidewalks previously recommend(-,d .e ider_` I and
theCommission would need to determine if Lhe recomm~.., ~ trail
location should be revised as a result of the Chang in land use
proposed.
George Kubik stated the change asminor and 'feels °"?'-r_, trail:
should remain as originally planned. Michele &v,,anson
the number of curb cuts on Town CenterDrive and ex ~.e,,
preference for a trail along Denmark fo:, 'ty and traff_,
reasons.
After much discussion, Wayne Sames moved, JoAnn Alt seconded
with all members voting in favor to keep the proposed trail
alignment o Town Center Drive and add a trail segment to tie
into Denmark.
BLUEBIRD OS
Mr. George Tre ,n _ . )re ..o re qu pe----- _ i n from
the Commission to pl c, 1 l <:bi_, hot::.: n th --tcott
Station Park. Mr. Trayno-_ explaine_a that he Duld cc,t uct the
houses and maintain them himself. I is his intention to monitor
the bluebird population in Eagan and help preserve this -®ecies.
Commission members commended Mr. Traynor for his s and
thanked him for following through on his idea.
George Kubik moved, Dick Carrol secorl ith al'.
voting in favor to approve the ins allati-, if the ::1
houses at Westcott Station Park based on a on+_ year trial - rJod.
ARBOR DAY RESOLUTION
Director Vraa introduced the Arbor Day Resolution to the
Commission and asked John VonDeLlnde to elaborate on -y(-,-,f.'s
events as well as the events being planned for this year.
Mr. VonDeLinde stated that last year was very successful and
there were twice as many people attending as they had originally
projected. This year's Arbor Day celebration will take place on
April 23 and he invited the Commission Members to at'enil and join
in the tree planting celebration. The Arbor Day r ' 'r~tion on
the 23rd will be followed by the second annual try-- -1 _in April
30th at the Public Works Building.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 12
Sandy Masin moved, JoAnn Alt seconded with all
voting in favor to adopt the Arbor Day Resolution as pry
SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 COMMU IE EDUCATION L17%'[SIO '
Director Vraa asked to have a volunteer from the Commission
to serve on the Community Education Advisory Committee. He
stated that Sandy ertz had served on this committee in the Rust
and that Sandy Masin had served on a similar committee for
District. 191. Michele Swanson expressed an interest
on the committee. Dick Carroll moved, Wayne Sames rir,_-
all members voting in favor to nominate Michele Swar'e~(1r= ~re
on the Community Education Advisory Comission for Scholl riot
196.
WINKLER JACKSON
Steve Sullivan reviewed the results of th neighborhood
meeting for the Winkler Jackson neighborhood park. I st<ted
there were approximately 25 re,--if---t pa_ --it an(' =rt of
the meeting was to get their input --_,r the n _ i - - - d I:-
Te neighbors were very responsive and shared thei® ide2 for the
development of Winkler Jackson Park.
Their primary focus seems to be to maintain the park in as
natural a state as possible by trying to preserve as much of the
natural vegetation as possible. Wayne Sames felt the residents
were looking at the park primarily for neighborhood use. Dick
Carroll was pleased with the good turnout for this meeting .
Both Members Same and Carroll attended the meeting.
COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE
Ken Vraa updated the Commission on the status of the
proposed Community Center. He stated that the Council had given
the approval at their April 5, 1988 meeting to go ahead with the
RFP to the various architects. Mr. Vraa indicated that the RFP's
had been prepared, and had already been distributed to all the
architects. He thanked Cerryl esko and Barbara Sellars for
accomplishing the task so quickly.
The Council also`aree to a joint interview committee
consisting of Council members, commission members and. S1-.aff
therefore, Mr. Vraa asked for two volunteers from the Com,Ass ion
to serve. Dick Carroll volunteered to serve on the joint
interview committee as did George Kubik. Wayne Sames indicated
he would serve as an alternate.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting
Page 13
Ken '.i ~ nought to the attention of rt
written by uel Bailey who is an intern i s t1.
Recreation Department, regarding swimming pools ve-:~u-~ L k
systems. He urged the Commission to read this report as 't-e>r- i
a lot of valuable information to be obtained. Mr. Vraa
Mel for the excellent job in preparing this extensive
DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS
Mr. Vraa stated that the softball rams, both ~l
children are filled to capacity. Intern Bennie Blood i,; wcrrlFti' g
on holding the first Mayor's Fishing apene in May.
With there being no further business to, Masin moved, Porter
seconded with all members voting i favor to adjourn the m_ 'ing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10.20 P.M.
DATE SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM
FRO : STEVE SU I , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
D : APRIL , 198
: CONSENT AGENDA - MAY 51 198
1. OT ADDITION E :
Rezoning o 2.0 (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single
Family) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 3 lots
located along the east side of Nicols Road and south of
Cliff Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 31.
RECD E kTDATIO :
The plat 1.)c subject to a cash parkland dedication and an
eight foot wide bituminous trail be placed along Nicols
Road.
2. RID HAVEN ADDITION - HAVEN ENTERPRISES:
A Preliminary Plat of 5.2 R-1 (Single Family
consisting of 14 lots located east of Hwy 13 and sout_~ -)f
Sibley Hills Drive in the SW 1/4 of Section 4.
RECOMMENDATION*
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
3. EAG D L LE MAY LA 3 ADDITION - OPUS CORP . fNT
_ _RI
MUTUAL LIFE:
A Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres within the Eagarnc11-1I y
Lake 1st and 2nd Additions consisting of one .3 acre lot
and an Outlet, and a Conditional U for lon sign
located south of Lone Oak Road West, a,wy ~ in north
half of Section 10.
RECOMMENDATION*
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
4. SILL ADDITION - MICHAEL R. ILL ^ r' _
I NC.:
A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, 14.41 LI
(Light Industrial) acres to a Planned P:eve<-.~ ?nt and a
Preliminary Plat consisting of 4 lots with a priv,"it, school
on Lot 1, Block 1, located along the south side of Silver
Bell Road in the E 1/4 of Section 19.
RECOMMENDATION,
The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication.
TO: ADVISORY KS r TI _ I-SIO
DATE: APRIL 2, 198
RE*. ALDEN POND ADDITION/ROSEWOOD CORPORATION
PROPOSAL
The proposal is for the rezoning from R-4 to R-3 and the r--limi-
nary plat of 225 townhouse units on 31.2 acres. This parcel is
located directly north of Quarry Park.
BACKGROUND
The action of the Advisory Planning _.c;rnr.i lion at the April 26,
1988 meeting, recommended a continuancf. This was to allow the
developer time to schedule a neighborhood meeting. The 7dvisory
Planning Commission will review the proposal at the May .~ing.
The Advisory Parks Commission has previously reviewed the park
dedication requirement in relation to Quarry Park cquisition.
(See Figure #1) . The 14 acre Fox Ridge Addit ~ c.i Jit,at ecc ~
southerly 1.4 acres of Quarry Park. Coachman T n
a cash dedication. Coachman Oaks condominiY,t ~L
northerly 1.38 acres of Quarry Park. The City cg~,?:- pt~ I
the remaining 6.5 acres with LAWCON grant funds. These park
dedications and purchases resulted in the current parkland con-
figuration of 9.28 acres. The subject parcel parkland dedication
obligation is still pending.
1
ANSI
Several residents of the neighborhood rxprr--- ri ,
Advisory Planning Commission regarding :he dl
on Quarry Park. The primary concern , that the a <r i
facilities would not be adequate handl i- :g the additional r s a
to occur as a result of the proposed apartments. In review, the
park service district has a projected 1900 population of _,466
people. This projection is reflective of several neighborhood
park service area populations:
o PSA#9 Quarry Park/Pilot Knob Park 3,466
o PSA#16 Blue Cross/Blue Shield 3,332
o PSA#30E Rahn Park 2,963
o PSA#19 Woodhaven Park/Carnelian 51868
Quarry/Pilot Knob Park is the third largest park service a_ ,Z)
~<r
within the park system. The park facilities at Quarry
include: 2 hockey rinks, free skate area, shelter buildir,
trails, picnic area, playground and free standing softball and
soccer field. Support facilities at Pilot Knob Park r:-:??re: 2
tennis courts, hockey rink, trails, parking lot, ha J 1,,(_),;-t, play
fields and playground. The Commission should notE t S.A. 9
include both Quarry and Pilot Knob Park.
Residents also expressed the need for tennis courts within Quarry
Park. The existing tennis courts within Pilot Knob Park is
within the park service district. The facility standard for ten-
nis courts is 1 per 1,750 population. The park system currently
has 21 tennis courts which can support a population of 36,750.
Constructing the 12 tennis courts propo.,ad at Northview Ath' tic
Fields results in facility/population t '`old for 57175
dents. With the construction of 2 t(-nis courts at Burr Caks
Park the threshold will be at 61,250. Planning staff estimates
that a population of 61,250 could be reached in the mid-1990's.
The current population of Eagan is approximately 43,000.
Staff's review of facilities within Quarry Park indicate- oten-
tial need of a hardcourt play area. The 1987 c-rrict -(-n-
structed hardcourts within many neighborhood , way-: ~
with high public usership. The initial facility ptc t-u
Quarry Park did not include a hardcourt play area.
The development proposal place the three southerly buildings
within 30' of the northerly park boundary (See Figure #2). The
hockey rinks are setback 40' from this property line and coif ;;,J ,a
the westerly 200' of the northwest corner of th< --P~w
developer is aware that the hockey rinks are lit.
that the proximity of the proposed bu'ldings to ~h<
facilities should be buffered by th -r-loper's
tional plant material adjacent to the park.
2
The Comprehensive Trails System Plan indicates an eight foot wide
bituminous trail along the east side of Coachman Ro-J. T]'
developer should also place an 8' wide bituminous trail or
south side of Four Oaks Road extending easterly to t] T-ji
property. This trail link will provide the opportunity for t~
connection between Quarry and Pilot Knob Park through the Unisys
property.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider the following recd Al-
den Pond Addition:
1. The developer provide a park dedication cash contrJL-',t-.on.
2. The City construct a hardcourt play area within Quar_-,1,
3. The developer place additional plant material south of
southern three buildings, providing a buffer/transition 1,
tween the development and the park.
4. The developer place an 8' bituminous trail on th{
of Coachman Road and along the south side of Four [c
extending to the development's easterly property li,, .
SSjbls
3
a ,A o
tl.
i
er•, 4i a v' '1 ~OO~ p' q °
v .t
Q
oal-au ~4 P Is 1~ IE W ~ ~
v. c r n r a..« " H ~ ro N
P+P••34 W
EYy °
~uL•,_JI
D AD0. . »`,l, COW.
wzI >r~
YACt i,f ~'PY'tN IA °0iw
FAN4 at a ,;=`:7$GQAG4MtaP! LANDARru~. $ a
( x13.31 ~,orl+ ~t
1 ^
--U R OAKS a. R
r: 1
B a PART OF
G. :B: o1a31
a ,;y
cCy' ~
2 r
~ i
3
Q
p z s
v
~t *x LOT r x A
ikxi WeWt* dp ~ ' ,
e®4 '1.We st ®,ft ~ C
Wf M• Ao t+4takpi W S
48n W0. !BWlJH.DAWW444 BtWM
"s
f
~ A e
2 „
. L.xr'(c' ~ n'f '^*....s a.,,. t`;j#'• SBY'iY q"E. :_65441-. i
t r yf®., i e rbl
s QUARRY `f
ao+ WiW cIq al E". 111
W m v olea~-sl
..av,rws w.4e 3aa"s!'6 ii~¢p°' t`ARK 'J" lop
1 rt~AGt IviF-a U 11-7 1k e.°~ lulr
a
F J C ,rF z iAP
yy r~ h
I
I [7 a~
t
zc r m
~ I
(7 DLon
'k l
t 5
y
K
1EMO D
TO: ADVISORY AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIV , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS FL"IT E-
DATE: MAY 3, 1988
UNISYS ADDITION
PROPOSAL
The proposal is for the preliminary plat of four lots on two
hundred five (205) acres.
BA-ICI KGROU
The preliminary plat has no park dedication issues."
for preliminary plat has provided the opportunity to a
pending trails issue. Unisys has a pending agreement t(_ nriect
Quarry Park to Pilot Knob Park via a trail through tl,, Ar
property. This trail agreement was a result of tax in ---Y
financing that they received in 1986.
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the possible trail alignments and provided an
exhibit indicating a possible alternative. This trail alignment
utilizes future boulevard trails as a result of the Alden Pond
development and a portion of an unused road section within the
Unisys property. Unisys would need to construct two trail links
at both ends of the unused road section in order to complete the
route. This alternative minimizes trail costs to Ur°sys and
provides an effective pedestrian link b the two
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
To approve the preliminary plat subject to Unisys working with
City staff i establishing a pedestrian link between Pilot Knob
and Quarry Park. Unisys to construct the trail link within a one
year ieframe from final plat approval.
1
r s
\777. _ _ j. 17
r
R
VAN A
C ~ "~rr?u.. ~ r.l r 6 ~ as # ~ - F -
t ^
c i
t
lot j
e
lk
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : STEPHEN SULLIVA , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS
PLANNER
ATE: APRIL 29, 1988
SUBJECT: 1' i~i-d ER/JACKSON P- : TEIGH, a'_
On April 12, 1988, a second neighborhood meeting was held
concerning the development of Winkler/Jackson Park. The purpose
of the meeting was to have the neighborhood review two concept
plans which were derived from their input of the initial
neighborhood meeting.
Bill Bradley, park planning intern, presented two similir
concepts. Each concept plan included the following facilities.
o Open play area
o Hard court
o Playground
o Picnic Area
o Looped bituminous trail
o Sliding hill
o Security light
o Open skate area
The concept plans indicted the preservation of significant
vegetation. The plans also proposed the placement of a red cedar
buffer along Cedar Road and a deciduous overstory buffer along
the proposed R-4. A crosswalk with signage was proposed,
crossing Slater Road at its intersection with James St-net.
The residents support the facility program and prefer-F(1 , c -P,
Plan B. (See Figure #1). The only issue to arise was 11r,t?-}2:r- tie
free skate should:
1. Be installed on the central low area (A)
2. Be included on the pond (B)
3. Not be included within the park.
It seems that the least s-,,-ported of the th_- _ Ls not irc,_°l .t
a free skate. The place of the free skat(, an the
o reduces the skating seasons
o increases maintenance
o is less safe for users and maintenance
0 places skating in a natural/aesthetic environment
The placement of the free skate within the central low area (A):
o increases the length of the skating season
o utilizes typical maintenance machinery and time
o provides a safe ice surface
o places skating in a manmade envir a
o places skating closer to the JamfStreet re~~
(230'+)
Staff has received a petition from residents within the
neighborhood preferring the skating area within the central low
area. (Attached)
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
The Commission may consider the following for Winkler/Jackson
Park:
1. Approve one of the following open skate alternatives:
o Utilize the existing pond for skating (B)
o Utilize the central low area (A)
o Remove the open skate frc t'.e faci'
program
2. Approve Concept B design and layout.
SSJbls
y
Q p ~ ~ u • Oil:
o
tot< -
0
ti v
a p.
All
a
b
a R
i
v 3 t
a 41
4
9 1
CC)
t e ` 3
0,
0
L i
,tee..
II k, C
r~ R
.r
' 6
w
t f
`
° d t
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY 1, R' ND
Ra : KEN , DIRECTOR a PARKS R. .c.210
DATE: APRIL 28, 1988
RE: IRRIGATION - NORTHVIEW PARK
ROUND
Thu 1984 parks bond referendum provided for the irrigation of i- e
four softball and the two soccer fields at Northview Park.
four softball fields were completed last year and plans have
prepared for the two soccer fields.
Since the 1984 bond referendum, the City I pu sd an
additional 1 acres next to Northview and lasi_ __r comp'. 1 the
grading for the planned expansion of 3 softball field . In
conjunction with the planning for the irrigation on the two
soccer fields, Staff has expanded the scope of the plnnn i r
effort to include irrigation for the 3 new softball fief ,
the needs of the planned, future park shelter building.
requesting authorization tomake expenditures from 11
fund for irrigating and meeting the needs of the - = t I
fields.
DISCUS S'°C'N ISSUES
As the commission is aware, the growth in athletic fields needs
has far exceeded projections. one time, it was expected 17aat
r
to meet field needs they would have to be built some time
1990. Today, it is saf+- to say that Lb ; additi C-zl ski :,-ill
need to be ready and ~^x-tiora' b re,-icon,
Staff has looked at fief C~, c nd of
providing irrigation to the three softball fig i,> t )rthview
and at the same time begin planning for the needs for the future
park shelter building.
Certain economies can be achieved as a result of this planning
effort. For example, while trenching in the main lisle for tre
irrigation system to the soccer fields, the City it 1>c,
install the sanitary sewer line for the park shelter LJ-I'L'J~dd .
ADDITIONAL COSTS
Staff has estimated that to complete the irrigation syster
the three softball fields at Northview, an additional $15,000
sprinkler heads, piping and controls would be requi--
Installation of the sanitary sewer is
and $10,000. In total, an additional $25,00" -rom th ,-rk sit'-
fund would be necessary in order to provide irrigatlui-i to the
three softball fields and to provide for the future sanitary
sewer and water to the proposed park shelter building. The
department is recommending that this additional funding be
provided from th-~ park site fund.
r " , T'OT
Because the need for additional field space is anticip-. ,1,
Commission should begin to discuss plans and st r
providing these needed facilities. This memo is not i
cover the range of alternatives that might be pursued in ,-d -3
meet these needs, but rather the need for irrigation fo:
fields and the economies to complete this work as o
Department staff feels that irrigation is a lc 4i--l
and will help to develop the fields and make t r
when the need arises.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
To approve/disapprove additional expenditures of $25,000 from the
park site fund for irrigation and sanitary sewer at Northvi a
Park in conjunction with the planned irrigation for two s--
fields.
:cm
MEMORANDUM
TO: VISO"7 PARKS D L~. TICIN M-,
FROM: KEN V---., DIRECTOR 01 1. REC-.--.-2ION
ATE: APRIL , 1988
RE: TRAVELING CONCESSIONS WAGON/JAMES L. SITO REQUEST
Attached to this memorandum is a letter from Mr. J_.- e, Sitko
requesting permission to operate a traveling conces~,i::- wagon
within the various parks in Eagan. Staff spoke with Mr. Sitko to
obtain additional information. Mr. Sitko will be present at the
Advisory Commission meeting to discuss this request and respond
to the Commission members questions.
` ITT-ST
Sitko is proposing to operate a cart type conces A
Wagon within the parks. His intenticl is to sell hot d c ,
potato chips, canned soft drinks and "hot tamales" which i
essentially a beef mixture wrapped in a corn meal tortilla. Mrs
Sitko would obtain the necessary licenses required for this
operation from the State of Minnesota as well as meet City
licensing requirements. Mr. Sitko would expect to e_ ice
primarily community park areas and neighborhood parks
events were scheduled; and neighborhood c{__ sales c, an
outdoor shopping mall event.
City Ordinance prohibits vending of products within the parks
without the specific written consent of the City through the
Director of Parks and Recreation/City Council.
DISCUSSION
For the purposes of review, Staff has discussed both the pro.
the cons of allowing this enterprise v, i `.u -e into the 1--k
system. Proponent views are essentially -at this might be a
service to the park users, who may be looking for a food or
refreshment item. As an enterprise, why not allow the individual
to test the marketplace with his concession wagon, allow the free
enterprise system to work? Approval to operate on the streets
will be required by the City Council, as is the Blue'~ird ice
cream service, therefore, why not allow this enterx to
function? If the individual is allowed in the ti .'t a-c~
he not be allowed in the parks? Fu °t r, cca._r f:~~. c
set up on a street adjacent to the pars althoujn -t. alJc a
specifically within the park itself.
Negative comments concerning the operation of h
wagons is that it is not a service t-'~
distraction and annoyance. Would it not vo
vehicles and pedestrians within the park ®.rea"r ulc the
concession lead to more litter and a cleanup expense for the
City? What about conflicts with existing park users su,v: as the
Eagan Blue Jays or Nortview Park concessions at their softball
tournaments? Would not the concessions wagon interfe-re with
concessions revenues for these operations? (This issue c t
mitigated by extracting a agreemen IrrC the
concessions vendor to not interfere wi". ; q in
or concessions items are already being If one is allowed, why wouldn't more be allowed and how do ~ :,.I
control them? or does the competitive marketplace take over 0
control the number? Perhaps a fee or license permit sho-10 the
extracted if this is to be an "exclusive" arrangement b,
the concessions individual utilizes city parks and publi,
a .1 T9 C'.` YaAfl TT f°t T°`
OT"
Sev --itil_-~~m5 contacted to learn how
wit'- this i - ue.
Minneapolis allows mobile units. They charge $700.00 per unit or
150 of gross receipts. Minneapolis issued 10 permits last year.
Edina allows them only for special events sucL as tAquatennial. They previously allowed Blue Bell ice
but have reversed t1--4 r decision and no longer allow t t
to the parks bec_U they are a "disturbance".
Bloomington, Plymouth, Mound, St. Paul, do not allow mobile
units; allowing concession sales in permanent structures only.
Typically, a license fee is required and a percentage of the
receipts, from 150 to 250.
Richfield does not have an ordinance against thei , but
require a license with a fee of $129.00. Peddlerz, -i only
remain 10 minutes at any one location.
ADDITIONAL REQ)VUIIRREMENTS
Should the Advisory Commission act to make a positive
recommendation to allow this concessions, Staff js suggesting
that some restrictions regarding the concessionaire to discussed
and required. These restrictions would cover regarding
where the concessions could be located with4n~ ar. f city
parks, requirements for a license, the ~3~>~ of
requiring liability insurance naming the City ~ c'._icgal
4.1
insured, an expiration date for the permis:n an r~?: Tonal
restrictions which may be addressed by the Advisory Commission.
FO ,)e7°r - IRY CC. ;I SIC (
The Advisory Commission should review the request from Mr. Sitko
and make a recommendation to allow, with conditions, or not to
allow the operation of a concessions wagon within Eagan parks.
a
April 8, 1088
Eagan Park and Recreation Commission
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P.O. Box 21100
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Dear Sir.
I would like your permission to operate a traveling concession wagon at
the various parks in the Eagan area. It is my intention to sell hot
dogs, potato chips, hot tamales and canned soft drinks. The wac-on will
-neet the current requirements of the State of Minnesota Depar -T,,i-13)t of
ealth and will be licensed through them and the City of Eac_---an.
I have been a resident of Eagan since relocating to 14i.nnusota from
Illinois in 1982. Initially I will be the only operator of the conces-
sion, but it is my hope to provide summer employment for teens in the
Eagan area.
If you require any additional information or have any questions, you may
contact me by mail or phone.
Thank You
James L. itko
1262 Carlson'Lake Lane
Eagan, Minnesota 55123
Home Phone 612-452-9841
Work Phone 612-726-3801
l
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADV:' C )ARKS AND RI ION -4
RECREATION SUPERVISOR, DOROTHY PET `C
ATE: MAY , 1988
SUBJECT: WINTER PROGRAM REPORT
The winter programs represent a significant it by the
department in terms of planning, actual man h)-trs worked by
permanent and seasonal staff and in the frequency/hours of
participation in pursuit of winter recreation by the community.
It is appropriate that a thorough evaluation of the operation be
addressed.
The three primary areas of activity to nrf
sliding/ sledding and cross country
concern are maintenance, staffing, saf.~ty ar,.) "ho partic- ,
It should be noted at the outset that all of these outdoor wi ter
activities rely on the weather. The degree of the departmG,,t's
success lies with its ability to plan for all eventualities and
play the hand Mother Nature deals. The winter of 1987-88,
slow to start, was near perfect, weather wise.
SKATING DROGRAM
t, aintenanae:
The manpower schedule for the base flooding phase is
programmed to begin the week after Thanksgiving. This
allows three weeks of work prior to the scheduled opening of
the rinks. Temperatures in late November/early December
were mild and base flooding was unable to c) iii-r,_-!c -til
December 14th. Two shifts; 9:30 p.m. - 6:0 . :?O
a.m. - 3:30 p.m., applied 480,220 gallons of _ .0:1 :l"r, -9
rink surfaces during the next nine (9) days. All sk -ping
sites were able to open on December 23, just four days later
than advertised. It is recommended that the two shift
approach be continued. In addition, seasonal staff working
along side the regular maintenance crew on Saturday/Monday
was of significant assistance.
The next 8-1/2 weeks provided near perfect temperate.-,-, I
maintaining skating surfaces. A new schedule of that included routine brooming and flooding of ri,,-.ks on
Saturdays was significant in terms of the quality of ice the
department was able to provide for the community. A total
of 560,379 gallons of water were applied during the weeks
the skating facilities were open.
Careful pre-season planning by maintenance evident
during the four occasions when snowfalls of art c-- more were
experienced. On each occasion all "A" sites were able to
open at the normal hour, on two of the occasions all A & B
sites were able to open as planned and on each occasion, all
snow was cleared and operations were back to normal within
24 hours.
A total of four days of rink closing were rienced
during the entire season. Three se c;f ;:treme
windchills and one due to a brief "melt" .,?i early
The ponds at Burr Oaks Park and Cedar Pond Park ac in were
difficult to maintain as skating surfaces. The problems
experienced included fluctuating water levels, unstable
shorelines and uneven thickness of the ice. On one occasion
a wheel of a groundsmaster broke through the ice in the
center of Cedar Pond.
In light of the difficulty and safety n r_~~j ' IJ
pond ice in a season of near perfect v-eather it otI' Jl)
appropriate for the commission to review the pravtic:, .f
skating rinks on ponds in order to give Staff direction
regarding Burr Oaks and Cedar Pond for the 1988-89 :-'eating
season and for the future regarding other ponds in t~- City
which are mentioned as possible rink sites by residue i-' .
"I- ' ;:_r Mai t - i,
Maintaining the o-•derly, clear ___,ince of th, 'ter
buildings was a combined task for t'- seasonal recreutiunal
leaders and permanent maintenance ~taff.
The success of this approach varied with the level f
traffic in a shelter. Site specific instructions were g
to the leaders and additional direction .s cxi~ < A~ at
supervisory visit. Additionally, othe~~ rll I -~<r
such as Tiny Tots placed added press,.,re 01), :lE~< ~g
necessities.
Consideration should be given, as the department looks to
the future, to contractual or specific building maintenance
staff who would be able to do regular "deep cleanir::i" ich
is difficult to achieve under the current mode of :Lion.
arming .Dues Trailers:
Again this year, warming house trailers were at
Ridgecliff and Pilot Knob. The trailers, 241 8
electrically heated were successful at these sites. The
department staff will be suggesting purchasing two trailers
as continued use appears to be certain for the next several
years. This is economically cheaper than renting if used
for a period of time greater than five years. Sites such as
Well Site may be identified as a trailer warming house
location.
Sfi•
Prior to the process of recruitment, it was realized that
the salary offered to winter recreation leaders would have
to be raised in order to compete with naw fast food
businesses in the city. The City Council '-p:.)=,veO Lhc- new
salary schedule.
The number of applicants for the recreation s )nal
positions was sufficient. Twenty seven intervic_:t were
conducted. Twenty three new staff and nine r,^;__,r.nirg
leaders provided 32 enthusiastic, personable, r
individuals to host the city's skating and;?_iding
facilities.
A general preseason orientation session was held, yn
been past practice. As the size of the staff has ~zd
the number of sites increased, one generic training ssion
is in need of review. The leaders primary questions are
site specific and those issues are time consuming to adA r c
in a generic session. First aid is a second area identi i
as requiring additional training.
In practice, site specific i_si___ _ ccite by
supervisory staff during the fig _ i. days _)i: r z t on.
A mid season staff meeting was called to re-emphasize
important aspects that were being unevenly addressed. This
approach was judged to be very successful.
Changes in staff training are important issues to be
reviewed prior to the next skating season.
-qK4 ingl)'p -dance:
GCS -ILL PA : This site was heavily programmed for hockey
team practices, the department's speed skating program and
was the most popular casual skating site in the city. The
site is over used! To alleviate the pressure on the site
next season, a cut back in hockey team practices is likely
and speed skating should be moved to a new site.
BLUE CROSS /BLUE S WT PAR : This new site was no' as
heavily as the department had envisioned. was
experienced with Gc.t Hill, it frequently takes a season for
the public to discover a site. BCBS is one of the sites
under consideration for the speed skating program.
OUARRY ARK: This new site was identified as the location
for the department's adult broomball leagues. A Unisys
broomball league also used one rink at Quarry.
The growth of broomball from 14 to 23 teams, necessit_
games to be scheduled on Sunday, Monday and Friday eveni rs
compared to only Mondays i the past.
A minimum number of hockey team practices were s t
Quarry. This allowed the site to have hours avail for
casual skating.
Attendance from the neighborhood was disappointing.
most usual attendance figures being 12-15 skaters.
-fm_ ".K: Significant n, -(-rs of hours
~c vlc_ 11"i,ere scheduled _t 'in Park, incl..
-.ours. The pattern of u by hockey teams
Saturdays have become game days. This change pro, 1,1.<, a
programming opportunity for the department. Ideas sac
youth b oomball are under consideration. Also, boot hoc:,_ o\,
for adults could be addressed. It should be noted that the
boards on the hockey rinks at Rahn are deterior.ting and
should be considered for replacement or extensJ.,. ir.
A general observation is that the :'s
classification of rinks is accurate, lev4' e
throughout the city conform to what was anticipated.
HI VI PARK: As the commission may recall, for the 19"--
88 skating season, Highview Park was reduced from a hc,c: y
rink, pleasure rink, warming shelter site to a :ieighh,,: ain1-d
pleasure rink. This change was well ec v:~d by '.l-
neighborhood. The department did not rer--i .-ompl
regarding the hours or lack of warming h a
0 ' IO - SKATING:
The 1987-88 skating season was the longest in duration in
the last 10 years. Performance by maintenance was
outstanding, ice conditions were excellent. The department
experienced improved hospitality at the helters.
The primary issues to be addressed -r Season a
look at shelter maintenance, a<wji in staff t fining
and relocation of program elements.
Staff would anticipate that during the next skating -.eaL°;on,
neighborhood special events can be planned at a?l rink
sites.
An apparent resolution of 976 t '-.phone calls will be in
place by the 1988-89 winter s_<_
SLIDING ILLS:
TRAPP FARM PARK: Lighting of the hill was a positive
influence on participation. The major problem is just too
many people. This created problems of control. Additional
staff were assigned to the site in order that the top <~:r,_d
bottom of the hill and the shelter could be monito:1-1-simultaneously.
Aspects being considered for prc -)l L 3°4 ,,>?'!_ution for next
season include: scarification of the hill to alleviate
icing conditions, separation of tubes and plastic sleds, a
delineated corridor for walking up the hill, additional
signage and an improved sound system.
The Director of the department has suggested :>r-~.'e-
innovations that would be "fun" yet would help to a3c~.__
safety concerns. Among the ideas are a t°affic lic. a_h--.
top of the hill, a tube driver's lic )r t:' , h~ 1
rules and hazardous sport on one side m; x -eting ir_f rmation
on the other, "playful" traffic cop attire nor the
attendants. The object would be better enforcement of
safety factors in a playful, rather than dogmatic manner.
Informal sliding hills: Several small bunny h'117, in
neighborhood parks are idAntified as official slidi►-
This practice will continr-~ with the exception of C d,. d
a~; g
and walnut Hill where i' noted that intere ,E1: it~
persisted throughout the inter. The departm(~tr to
continue to provide for walking by plowing th pui:.aL~.
CROSS COUNTRY SKI TRAILS:
The city of Lakeville, under contract to the department,
again groomed the city's cross country ski trails. The
operation was completed three times during the
Compaction and lack of significant snowfalls r ► c°1 ~,zd
additional grooming.
An upgrade of signage for the cross country ski trails is on
the agenda for next season.
YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION:
Department staff met with representatives from µl Youth
Hockey Associations on a pre and post season basis.
Practice schedules were finalized pre-season to meet the
association's needs. Use of reserved practice time was
monitored during the season.
The post season meeting elicited compliments to maintenance
on the quality of the ice, provided an indication that the
associations were satisfied and stated that the season "went
better".
A possible new direction for youth hockey in Eac. i
revealed to staff. The Eagan Hock- - ssocia'- . In
petitioned the Minnesota AmatFeur ..-c .-,,r Asso ;
requesting that all youth in the City of agan be ide~l.i,_iod
with the EHA. Should this becc r a reality, the impact on
city facilities could be as follows: The 100-150 E-j n
youth now registered with Mend-Eagan or the Rosemount ~roa
Hockey Association would be directed to EHA. All outdo -r
practice ice time for EHA comes from the city of Eagan.
Communication between staff and the youtl°
associations during the season was excellent, staff e
to reinforce the neighborhood needs and to create a -tt r
overall understanding with officials of the youth
associations.
SUMMATION:
Staff, though satisfied by numerous ouccesses t
winter are cognizant that issues in to b€
Primary among them are continued u - if ponce
skating surfaces, safety concerns for the Trapp W-rn~, Pa--k
sliding hills, new direction and growth for the Eagan Hockey
Association and issues relating to shelter building
maintenance.
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARR RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
ATE: Y 5, 1988
SUBJECT: URBAN REFORESTATION/TRUST FUND
St-.ff is asking the Advisory Commission to react to an idea; that
of creating a "trust fund" to be used for reforestation efforts
in Eagan.
BACKGROUND
How many times has the Advisory Commission or it,=il
heard or perhaps said themselves, "this development is destru>ying
a large number of beautiful trees and open space -real', oZ- "the
reason we moved to Eagan and liked it here - was because of the
open space, hills and trees". This development will destroy all
this!"
The Advisory Commission and City Council took a significa~-lc .
three years ago in an attempt to reduce site dis r - it r_ <is
result of development and bolster landscaping in c"
by developing a landscaping policy. This policy as pro,,-ed
successful in encouraging and requiring additional tree planting,
shrubs and greenspace in many of the new commercial areas. Un-
fortunately, the policy is not applied to residential areas, nor
does it address the long term desirability for developing and en-
hancing tree planting, and native vegetation development in other
areas of the City.
Another "ideal' is being suggested, and the Commission is asked to
review this concept to determine if it has merit. The purpose of
this memorandum is to outline the idea, and see if it should be
refined further for consideration by the Advisory Commission/City
Council.
TRUST FUND- Scenic Reforestation Contribution
n
The idea is very simple. A sum of money would be
which the interest earnings are used to enhance fog-~e '..rti~,la ef-
forts in parks, residential and open space areas. The trust fund
would be developed through two sources of revenue. One through
gifts and donations and the second through a fee payment on
residential/commercial development at the time of building per-
mit issuance. This fee is separate and distinguishable from
parks dedication, irregardless of the sub-division's meeting of
park dedication requirements through a cash, land or PUD
agreement; the cash payment per residential unit would still be
required and collected with each building permit. The scenic
reforestation contribution trust fund would be a dedicated fund
and could only be used for the intended purpose. A limit might
be set on the size of the endowment from which interest t ing
would be used.
The purpose of the fund, mentioned earlier, would be to enhance
forestation efforts. This idea could be expanded to include an
area inherent to the prairie area at Tho' • _s Lalcz.
flower bed, or create an arboretum (diE -1 -1,
between the proposed community center a,,% a
provide assistance in planting programs in e ic1s,E.; L a . 'rn
any case, the exact purpose can be refined with the Commi don's
input.
As to the funding of the dedicated trust fund, if $10.00
living unit were to be assessed o all building permits, the C,,,
would have had $12,270 in 1956, and $21,000 in 1987, for a
of $33,270.
Since development comes primarily from
perhaps it would be justifiable to as a t'z v; )u' ' hel A
for reforestation efforts.
As you know, the City is currently providing limi' fuz
within the forestry budget for tree planting. Nn -f-71,1-, ,
will grow or a the least maintain its preser
fund could be seen as an opportunity
level of support, rather than be subb ~ ~
general fund dollars allocated for fore- x.
O COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Staff would like to "brainstorm" with the Advisory Com--i --n
regarding this concept. If there is a favorable reactio_i,
paps members of the Advisory Commission and staff could it a
clear position paper fo- future review the I ri
lion. If approved, t i woul<' o ~xa.l
with/or without a recom___ _i-1 tion for ac--'c..i and
/bls
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
VISE) PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: K V , DIR^CTO Q PARKS D R-C' %I _:_ON
DATE: 27, 1 11 - E: COMMUNITY CENTER I
By way of periodic memorandums, I will try to k( you
n._
the progress being made on the Community CE--t--- -n-`
has prepared and distributed to the Advisors W
Commission members 3-ring binders contai_i
information assembled to date on the Community C nter. This
binder can be added to with relative information as the city
continues through the architectural/schematic phases over the
next several months. You may find it desirable to include these
periodic memorandums for future reference to your binders, which
are being distributed to you.
ARCHI EOT * ~rmlp :
The requ f - proposal sent to 11 architectural firm
day following Council approval. The RFP also inclu;_.d
topographic and site information pertaining to the site pT-C,1;),),-, -,d
for the Community Center. In addition to the 11 firm., 3
additional architectural firms requested proposals and they,, oo,
were sent the RFP and roposer's form. The proposer's m_g
was conducted on April 15, 1988 to respond to questions frr)i
architectural firms and to provide additional info - t 'I
concerning the project.
Resp~: ,-1 are due on Monday, May 2, at 4:30 P.M. Interv are
tentatively scheduled for May 10, 1988. Richard Carrc'l and
George Kubik from the Advisory Commission have been selected to
serve on the interview panel along with Council and Staff.
ARCHITECTURAL OBJECTIVES:
The architectural objectives have been d_-_
and program writing for the various com,;u. . Gn
"focus teams", established to meet and wri_, the d F''; x
for each of the components have been meeting periodically. f~_?1
focus team members, numbering approximately 28, met on
April 18, to discuss how each focus team was to wore,, th~2
structure of the staff organization as well as their rclE= -°1
responsibilities. The ice arena focus team has already co:p
a three hour se7,;ion and developed preliminE-_ry program
for the ice ~a -na, team rooms, refrige,-~
room. A second. session is planned to co;%les
issues. Other terms have also been meeting to develc- ~a ~s:~ r i g
their space need requirements.
RESEARCH ISSUES*
Both the Director and intern in the departmer Mel B_=111 .l.
been doing additional research on of
Council f Staff will be facing in the :.:c-,_.
research has been done on fees and cl 3, tl-( principle or tee
establishment to provide background in-o--nation fort",-, Coin ~_;il.
Ultimately, direction from the Council will be required for Staff
concerning the development of fees and charges for the facility.
Other issues being researched include contracting of cone=c'_ i11cil>,
gymnastics use and needs, office space requirement
department staff and specific building materials t1W_'_ n,-- V
called for in the facility.
A itina~ry soils investigation was undertaken to help
determir site suitability. The preliminary report co:itains both
good and not so good news. Generally, the site to be
acceptable and should support a building, although -3e of
finding granular soils did not materialize. Of -C , i~
the discovery of a "fill area". TIA z., a rather
immediately south of City Hall. , ly, this : t L
area is the overburden from when thC 0011ce t~~~
constructed several years ago. This is of some cer.-ern depends I
upon the proposed building location and parking lc , etc.
If any members of the City Council, Advisory Commission or Staff
would like additional information concerning particular
of the Community Center or expansion of the items ment c1,1cc<,
please feel free to contact me directly.
MEMORANDUM
TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
O : EL BAILEY, PARKS RECREATION INTERN
KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: APRIL 28, 1988
SUBJECT: PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR FEES AND CHA'tGE,:
ISSUE
The purpose of this memo is to bring out some of the major i
for and against the charging of user fees, and fee levels iLo!:
parks and recreation services. This will be particularly
plicable to the community center since the facility will have
services unlike the present ones offered.
BACKGROUND
This report was completed by the use of twenty recent magazine
and journal articles associated and researched in the field of
parks and recreation, and in conjunction with the University of
Minnesota. These articles were supplied by Dr. Sohn Schultz,
Department of Recreation, Parks and LEisur --udies, Tniversity
of Minnesota. Dr. Schultz has done a le -.s= of re-
search on the philosophy of assessing a. . irargc:~ Lcr parks
and recreation.
Mel Bailey authored the "study" under the direction of the
Director of Parks & Recreation, to help the Commission better un-
derstand the issues relative to the philosophy of assessing fees
for recreational opportunities. The hope is that the report will
help direct the Commission in the assessment of fees for the com-
munity center.
SUMMARY
The major conclusion that can be made is that there are many con-
ditions that must be considered in setting fees and charges. The
consensus of park and recreation professionals is that public
recreation cannot be truly free; some very real costs are in-
curred, and they must be met in some way. When the t al vole e
of recreation was much smaller, communlt_:,, could z- to
sidize programs through taxes. However, as deman" a41ts U. .a
higher, the issue cannot continue to be swept under he rug; 't
is becoming more and more difficult to meet additional recreation
needs when tax revenues have not increased proportionately.
There are specific benefits realized when park and recreation
departments implement fees and charges. Revenue is generated,
costs are defrayed to actual participants, and residents ?Live
outside the taxing authority contribute to the expense of par-
ticular facility.
Some objections to user fees are that they limit parU
are double taxing, and often carried "too far" to
those services which are fiscally prudent.
Staff feels that user fees can be compatible with an emerging
ethical imperative for parks and recreation. The key element for
this to be successful is to eliminate or minimize the potential
negative effect that fees and charges might have.
FOR COMMISSION ATTENTION
A fees and charge policy has particular importance:, he com-
munity center. The issue of generating fees and "revenue
producing activities", may well dictate whether the -acility is
profitable or subsidized through taxes.
Direction will need to be taken in deciding what sere i
community center will be used to generate fees. Al
will have to be made on special services regard.
users paying extra or receiving a discount.
It is hoped this "study" will bring to light one of the major
issues (fees and charges) in the parks and recreation field
today.
This study is the first of a two-phase process. Staff ..ill be
preparing a second report on "fees and charges ro_icy", d how
this directly relates to the community center. As will s
pleted once the specific components of the facility are
upon.
MBjbls
ANr
I` r loving Fees a C ar es ationale
Lost park and recreation agencies have examined or
issue of how much should be charged for differ
their services. The result is a spectrum of
some agencies still attempting to provide all o, t:=_s
"free" (depending almost exclusively on tax levy ullI)o, ile
others are charging a multitude of fees and often prod?.">.:~i,,g a
"profit" or "contingency" on various aspects of their proCr-,Mm, i z-g
services.
Historically, park and recreation agencie__ have t
services "free" or have assessed a no-,i 1_
recent economic conditions and public at- _ti-
many agencies are more likely to closely
some type of fee structue.
As a park and recreation agency explores the issue of and
charges, they are faced with the task of discussing h sic
philosophies behind the provision of leisure s,-rvi In
developing a rationale particularly suited to thei- oi ,
the need arises to consider both sides of the
charge arguments.
7' i; "r C ardin Fees:
1. Fees generate revenue:
This helps the agency budget and lessens the burden to the
taxpayers, and often serves to improve park services.
example, if an enterprise fund is established for a
munity program and the profits are put into the fund, ie
revenues can be used to offer additional services and/or `:.o
make capital improvements.
2. The participants who use a service should hel defra,
costs of its provision:
In most cases, fees and charges do not cover the total
of providing a service. Those who actually use the p
should help to pay for it, rather than relying on ti-i
general public to entirely subsidize their activities.
3. Fees often instill appreciation:
Participants who utilize a service which is "free" ,a- : {.n
sociate that value with their experience. When ir-
paid, they realize that it "costs" money o pr
service, and psychologically develop an D°.atio
on the dollar value paid.
1
4. Equit;,y ar uments:
A user charge is perhaps the best way of making the person
who lives elsewhere (non-resident) contribute to th= cost of
the recreational activity. In fact, except :-r person-,l in-
come taxes paid to higher levels of g t, I I C1; in
turn are used as grants in-aid to local g-- x , _t is
the only way non-residents can contribute.
5. Fees to encourage private evelo meat:
Private provision of outdoor recreation facilitieE
general public use involves many difficult problf u ins:; 1JU11-
ing competition from essentially free public E >d ;t
entrance of user fees at public areas woula v,e
hurdle for private operation.
C014SIDERATIONS FOR NOT CHARGING E
1. Fees may limit Participation to those who can tray, and dis-
riminate against persons with low-income:
The need for recreational opportunities i_
everyone, regardless of the ability to pay.
set fees need to be aware of the extent, 1-c i ind
characteristics of the low-income population in thei -
ice area.
There are two replies to the argument. First, prone v
taxes, which are the primary source of tax revenues fox
local recreation and parks, are regret ive. Th7~L i , F.llc__- '
tend to bear much more heavily on 1- in,--+- ° , i
upon higher income groups. This is ----u---
generally represent a larger proportic-i of a rr.'r" - 'S s
total income than a wealthier persons income. It '.s en-
tirely possible that the poor would be better off if they
were charged user prices and given the option of not par-
ticipating in offered services, therefore avoiding t', pay-
ment, rather than being forced to pay taxes for ces
they do not want.
Secondly, if some low-income individuals whose L )f serv-
ices were to be subsidized, it might be better _.o provide
subsidized tickets to them rather than offering the services
to everyone at no cost, regardless of their incomes. Such
a strategy may be implemented by waiving fees on an in-
dividual basis, having local citizens, businesses, or serv-
ice clubs provide scholarships or subsidized proc~rz:gal; .
2
2. Fees constitute "double taxation".
This term is often referenced by opponents of who state
that citizens have already paid for park ai.- recreation
services through their taxes.
There are two rebuttals to those who believe in the double
taxation theory: First, the taxes that citizens pay often
do not cover the full cost of providing that service, and
second, users who pay a fee and enjoy participating are
still subsidized by those tax payers who do not or cannot
participate.
3. Philosophical ol,,j -1*`ons:
Perhaps the stubbornest objection to user charges is
philosophical. Many specialists i parks and recreation are
opposed to user charges as matter of principal. They
argue that parks should be free to 11, as school, -,r free
to all; and that the necessary co-' -hould ome
other way. Proponents of this vicar lieve w.,
tion should be given to convincing publics ofticL the
public good of parks and recreation and profe,.'-onals
should not give into the current popularity of su,xply-side
economics. Thus, their belief is to concentrate on the jus-
tification that the general public has been better off for
the mere existence of public park and recreation sertii'
It would be premature to propose concrete m<na C
tives based on the phi] sophical view present r . l
of the argument is r )rid _speculation, in ni of cc
roboration through disco sion and research.
. When carried "too far", fees and charge systems romote_e) '
those services which are fiscally prudent:
Often, agencies which adopt a fee and charge system t nd to
Judge their program or party„tar service on itr_-k;'44- to
generate income. In some _ s, a quality I ro,_ is
dropped even though it is sc 'ing an important r, f
the community, because it is not generating "enough" it(-
when compared to others. A park and recreation agen:y
should be sensitive to the entire needs of the community
when considering the level of success for a progr<°~r,, not
just the revenue generated. Consequently, program:; t c,-n
generate revenues can be used to support other pro
which are not able to.
3
a. Vulr rability of user fees and chr,
der gion•
Some ecreation administrators fear that, if user fees and
charges were the sole or chief source of revenue, they might
be in difficult circumstances i attendance fell off during
a economic downturn, or because of taxing limits, :ire
forced to raise fees dramatically to make u revenue wit.h.10,:.
an increase in program value/ quality.
The first situation may be a dubious ar (-r'_1. If
sion were severe enough to cause a sig: ' =.~al:it e
demand, the situation might be no ett,,::,.r if c- _ i g
revenue came from general appropriations, for these would
probably also be cut. Moreover, if attendance actually
declined, most recreation agencies could make so-i". J11--
ments in operation without critically weaken'n( t
ganization on a continuing basis. This a r.~.
user charges would completely lose its force i
agencies were allowed to carry modest amounts ol t
funds forward from one year to the next.
6. Potential unacceptability of user fees to the public:
People often object to paying for what has trail i+ ' mn l l y
been free or of nominal price. There may be ways, t j
to avoid such objections by returning revenues i _o
the collecting agency for facility and service
Moreover, research has consistently shown a z ial
willingness by the public to pay for recrea::i par-
ticularly quality programs.
7. Fees may decrease attendance:
Many fear that fees will lead to public rejection c
services. This is mostly bec iu dark anti recreat. A.'.. t°
ices have traditionally been ; t pported t ~ ougY~ t °<KeL and
provided "free" to the public.
Attendance may be affected if the prices which are imposed
are not competitive, i.e., at or below other similar prices
in the service area. Many park and recreation departmr-i s
take into consideration the service prices of th'-_
sector and set their prices at or slightly below t'
because: (1) they o not wish to "undercut" the f
the private sector which is supporting the park "tion department through taxes, and (2) unlike r,,-)lic
service fee, the private service fee includes a --ant-:_e
to realize a profit.
CONCLUSION
I hope that the discussion above has put some light on one of the
most actively debated issues in the parks and recreation field
today concerning the financing of activities.
The common feeling of p ionals in the field is that public
recreation cannot be truly free; some very real costs are in-
curred and must be met in some way. A basic philosophical con-
cept which is common to many park and recreation agencies is t'-at
of basic and special services. often basic services (such as e
provision of a well maintained park area with basic buildir,
restroo facilities) are provided free. Special -
however, which incur additional costs or that are f
particular group, are provided for a fee to off-se- f
provision. The staff believes that most of the communi y
activities would be considered special services, thus requirir, a
fee charged. The important question for discussion will be the
basic services in the community center, and whether a fee should
be charged for their use. For example, a floating device used in
the swimming pool and scoreboard use in the ice arena.
In regard to the potential discriminatic of -
derpriviledged, it i- 14- fees should r-.-'L lLA_
those who can pay. F waivers, discos _.ts, or c t' _ d ; - _ n w s
to the fee schedule s_Lould be available to those who o< , n af-
ford fees. In the case of entrance fees, providing a free day
periodically, or providing special programming targeted at a par-
ticular group at a minimal charge could be established.
Another concept which is sometimes adopted in parks l
tion fee policy is that of charging resident and
fees. Often individuals who do not contribute to t.
within the agency®s jurisdiction (non-residents) pa-r
tional amount in lieu of the property taxes paid by res__'d nt.-.
In heavily used areas resident/non-resident fees may be used as a
form of rationing, giving priority to the residents who are
paying for the service through their taxes. The major problems
with enforcing resident/non-resident fees are verifying residency
status, public relations, and the difficulty of finding an equi-
table method of computing the non-resident fee.
The generalizations offered in this study suggest user fees can
be compatible with an emerging ethical imperative for the park
and recreation profession. They will only be compatible,
however, if they reflect a well formed philosophy guiding the to-
tal management of a recreational resource. The intention of this
paper has been to examine some of the historical and philo=:c,~ -
cal issues involved in the decision of whether cc not to
fees and charges for park and recreation vir . T' =Fx=
has particular importance to the communit-, _,nt . Si__, t: :c
majority of activities in the facility woul" be cansider d t-
cial services and, thus, a fee charged would be applicable.
5
-
The second part of this study will be to set a more specific
and charges philosophy for the community center. This wi-i_ e
done once the particular components of the facility a e= LU.Le
defined. Since the type and design of the particular co.;:onents
of the center will likely determine such policy.
Bfbls
6
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
GaERAL 550 26,183 64,130 34,597
GOAT HILL 551 4,164 ~355 192,891 35,329
RAHN 552 102,620 147,895 165,114 20,501
NOATIM W 553 125,153 21,846 65,151 199,329 208 1$>%'
TRAPP FARM 554 8,803 206,015 203,078 40,580 1,650 460,126
TRAITS 555 0
BLZJE CROSS 556 1,806 126,210 182,286 310,30
BURR OAK 557 8,151 257 2, °10
CARLSON LAKE 598 47
CARNELIAN 19 61 110,167
QUARRY ) 3,563 114 O> r=_ 124,556
CEDAR PCND, 561 12 '(rj o1
CXlMw HCVE 562 1,515 8,665 36 10,216
CINNA 563 10, 32 2,058 3,276 15,662
O' Y 564 123 210 21,067 138,854 160,,A
EVERGFUN 565 10,681 8,460 1,931 21,Q7.-'.
FISH LAKE 566 46,380 1,511 47,293
E
HIGH 567 8,300 3,029
HEINE POO 568 18 18
LAIMIDE 569 304 49,532 iE IS
LEK "rW 570 6,561 1,971 q, 532
NSA ,AND 571 7,595 106 92,387 20,110
OAK CHASE 572 8,050 10,104 900 05>4
PERIODT 573 8,950 401 20,720 00 C.71
PILOT KNOB 574 2,520 123 40,583 2,745 45,971
R LIEF 575 15,457 45,215 16,996 32,070
RIVER HILLS 576 6,500 2,358 21
SOUTH OAKS 577 4,789 It 3 11 8,347
WALDEN 578 36
WENT STATION 579 0
~UODHAVEN 580 88,050 2,330 12,951 2,150 25,481
WDELER 581 17 17
I:STION 582 463 1,908 433,186 5,112 4140,669
WAUVr HILL 583 4,742 115,853 17,203 21,244 159,042
THOMAS LAKE 584 239 175,940 1 ir1" , 179
VIENNA WOOD 585 79,024 TOTAL 370,306 918,024 1,615,655 1,335,894 21247
MEMORANDUM
TO ADVISORY I N l iTTC/N G 1l J
FROM: KEN VRA , DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MAY , 1988
DEPARTMENT RE: HAPPENINGS
1. The final preparations were completed at Northvi w, Rah
Goat Hill Parks for the upcoming baseballfsoftbs.ll n.
Special emphasis was put on finishing tough, For
irrigation system for both Goat Hill and Nort1 r-< l
top dressing, including along ill trench lines, t_p r,
of irrigation heads a---' rc , lming of c..rl.~
completed. Softball Licially starts~r
May 2nd with the women's 1 g .
2. Department Staff has met with Dakota, Inc., who rr=:ent
mentally disabled individuals in trying to fin Ji job
opportunities within the Parks and Recreation De??~,rt...ant.
Staff will be pursuing the possibilities of co ict
cleaning of park shelter buildings and periodic par
through this organization. Dakota, Inc.
transportation, job supervision and
responsibilities so you would contract for their sef.` I
an hourly basis by job content rather than time worked.
3. The new park identification signs have been installed at 15
locations.
4. Management burn of the Thomas Lake native prairi
completed on Wednesday, April 20, 1988. The
preceding the burn provided ideal conditions
and thorough burn. Staff will continue to conduct. b -1
burns which are considered to be the best meth,, for
maintaining the health of the prairie.
5. Staff has been preparing infields at various sites srrlr7ry
neighborhood parks and school district fields.
has mainly involved grading and shaping of the infi_Ids. -.e
striping operations have also begun at all ballfield
locations.
6. The second annual tree sale was conducted on April 30th ith
400 trees being made available to the public at thi:_ 1 .
Again, this event was an overwhelming success.
7. Archery standards at Walnut Hill Park have been completely
refurbished as a result of damage by a fire set by vandals
last fall.
8. Approximately 65 people were present at Quarry Park for the
tree planting activities as in of the Arb,
celebration. Machu I ,v ,'_ock I.a
transplanted from the
also received some pl r a_.- v s1__ x ,
major park landscaping pro j -ct .
9. Recreation Supervisor Paula Nowariak, Interns BC?
Blood participated in sponsorship of the Walk Nina
program held in St. Paul on Saturday, April 30t1l.
year's Walk Minnesota grogram will begin at Blue 1
Shield and is scedu' or April 29, 1989.
10. Intern Bonnie Blood 'i developed th
opener" for Sunday, May 1, . < <s. at Fish Lak( k. The !L- 1 1~_g
Opener is a take-off on the Governor's pener which is
Saturday.
11. Fishing docks have been installed at Trapp Farr,'a
Lake Parks and already both parks have been
for fishermen and children's use.
12. The hiring of all ;F: s27a1 parks maintenanc has
been completed including ballfield atten'_..n_ park
attendants, weed inspector and seasonal maintenance.
13. Mr. Alexander Lamers was selected for the Parks Maintenance
worker vacancy from an initial field of over 450 applicants.
He has an Associates of Arts degree in r_cr t., land
management and several years of parks maim -ice
with Wright County. He began work this pas'_
14. With the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the park shelter
building at Well Site Park will have to be removed. Because
of its condition, the building will be demolished and
removed from the site rather than making any atten~4-,"-a to
salvage it. In it's place, Staff intends to pL_s_
trailer unit similar to the ones that have been the
last two winter seasons, for placement at the w'c._ Site
Park.
15. Dorothy Peterson and Paula Nowariak have ~~,k~iplet National
Youth Soccer Coach's certification trair:ing fc some 32
soccer coaches recently. The certification progiam is one
the department began approximately 2 years ago.
16. Director of Parks and Recreation recently received a ch
for $4,000 from the Rahn Parent Teachers Organiz:it`on .Ior a
portion of the cost to cover the playgrour^'. -qui rrrr
is to be installed between Rahn School any' s
equipment will be installed in late June or
17. Playground equipment ha, - been ordu~ - "or
Park/School which was de:_i. in coop, _,_ti_.i wi I ; u l
District 196. Commission members will recall t. --he
school district will be paying 1000 of the co -or this
equipment with the department providing all de-° ai:c
and installation. This equipment is expected t
time in July with installation scheduled to be September 1st.
18. Seventeen co-recreational team: -_-r -a
organizational meeting this past Frica, . Iii ; : T >
increase of five teams from last yea for a t .l °f 1
teams for the 1988 season. Play begins June 3, 1988 for the
co-recreational teams.
19. The Groundpounders Grand Prix Running Series and Wal'"
it's third season at Ti Farm Park o: i-day,
8:00 A.M. Again this 1 ar, the run/wal will be
volunteers from Jaycees and staff from surroundinc,
participating in the running series. Burger King o,
is also providing orange drink for this event. > -
registration has gone very well and we are expecting to have
the largest number of participants in the three year
history.
0. Interviewing for summer playground staff has now k c_r~t:r .
Approximately 16 returning staff members are expcct-ed
meaning the smallest number of new hires for Long time.
The summer program begins June 13th and concluc', July 28th.
21. A tennis clinic is scheduled for May 28th at the new
courts at Blue Cross/Blue Shield and O'Leary P , i-'~.S for
children in the 4th, 5th and 6th grade. This is the -e~;ond
year for this tennis clinic program.
22. Registration for summer p ash U11 ins --,~1, 1 1 at the
municipal center. Inform( tic r~ i - ining to -ummer
programs will be in the Eagan r -,letter which i- nue in
resident's homes by May 15th.
Should members of the Advisory Commission have qua
pertaining to items listed under Department Happenings, p'(<
feel free to contact this department.
'Ir
•
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.Q. BOX 21144 VAC Eft ON
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
April 25, 1988 DA.
P N;., _ : A
THEODOR< V- < `TER
Council; 6mt-rs
THOMAS HEDGES
Mr. Chuck Lowrey, Director City Administrator
Dakota County Parks EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
8 5 0 0 127th St. E City Clerk
Hasting, MN 55033
Dear Chuck:
Please bear with me as I provide you with some background infor-
mation prior to asking your assistance.
The City will be developing a new neighborhood park called
"George Ohmann Park". This park is located immediately west of
Parkview Golf Course and is east of Pilot Knob Road. I have
enclosed a City map which reflects the general location of this
park. As you can see, the park abutts at its southeast corner
with Lebanon Hills Regional Park.
If you again look at the map, you will notice a residential sub-
division immediately east of Parkview Golf Course. This sub-
division, Parkcliff, has two trailways that lead off of Parkridge
Drive and access Lebanon Hills Park. One trailway access goes to
the south, the other to the east.
Recently, the department has received two calls from residents
within this sub-division concerning access to Ohmann Park. Ob-
viously, one access can be by Cliff to Pilot Knob, and Pilot Knob
to the park. Another, equally logical means, would be through a
trail from the sub-division through Lebanon Hills Park to Ohmann
Park.
My question to you, on behalf of the residents of this sub-
division, can there be a trail from this resident addition to Oh-
.c ally
mann Park through Lebanon Hills? Although, I am not
aware of the history, presumedly there was some discussion
regarding a trailway through or into the park when this sub-
division was platted several years ago. Perhaps you can recall
the intention of the trailway when it was platted. Couldn't this
same trailway access be used as a path to Ohmann Park? It Is my
belief that such a trailway would be just that - a trail, c ital.o'~t
the benefit of it being a hard surface/or of asphalt cogs~;-Li -
tion. Perhaps a mowed or woodchip trail would suffice.
1
THE LONE O TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH D GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Z would appreciate your review of this issue to see if such a
-trail would be workable and might be accomplished through coor-
dination of planning efforts.
Thank you for your attention to this issue.
inc el ,
Ken Vraa
Director of Parks Recreation
fbls
cc: Jeannie Eby
Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
Enclosure
AN&
CITY OF G
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE,
(POTTS ADDITION)
APPLICANT: KEN POTTS
LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 31
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 13
REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS,
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 2.0 A (agricultural) acres to an R-1
(single-family) district consisting of three lots located along
the east side of Nicols Road and south of Cliff Road. This
proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent land use
plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently, there is a home on
proposed Lot 2 (28,841 SF). It is 92.5' wide in order to
maintain side yard setback requirements. Lot 3 to the south is
the same size. Lot 1 contains 24,574 SF but is only 75' wide due
to the setback requirements for the existing home. The site is
heavily wooded with mature oaks and it falls toward a pending
area to the northeast. Both vacant lots would provide nice
custom home sites. The existing home has a front yard setback
approximately 37' from the Nicols Road right-of-way; Code only
requires 30' and the closer the home is to the street, the more
trees will be saved.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed by this
development involves providing building pads for two homes. The
proposed grading plan shows slopes greater than the maximum
allowable 3:1 criteria.
An area of concern is identified as the very steep (25%-40%)
sloped existing topography of the site and the coarse textured
soils that are present. The high erosion probability of the
natural soils necessitates the need for revegetation of disturbed
slope areas in a timely manner.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve this development is readily available along the
easterly side of Nicols Road. The development will be required
to provide a water service to each of the proposed lots.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is
readily available along the westerly side of Nicols Road. The
development is required to provide a sanitary sewer service to
.,each of the proposed lots.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the site is
readily available from Nicols Road.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development is required to
provide sufficient right-of-way for Nicols Road to incorporate
the existing water main along the westerly boundary of the
proposed site and still maintain the minimum required 30° setback
from the right-of-way to the existing home.
No regulatory agency permit requirements are anticipated except
for the City of Eagan permit required for excavation in public
right-of-way.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City
special assessment policies in effect at this time:
PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY T
259 Storm Sewer Trunk $.056/sf 82,256 $4,606
460 Nicols Road 24.02/ff 264 6,343
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $10,949
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in. accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with. City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
e
POTTS ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, C2, El, El, and Gl.
2. Homes on Lots 1 and 3 shall connect to City water and sewer
and 30' front yard setbacks shall be allowed.
3. This development is required to supply each proposed lot
with a sanitary sewer and water service.
4. This development is required to dedicate sufficient right-
of-way to include the existing water main along the
easterly side of Nicols Road but maintain building setbacks
in accordance with City Code.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 5, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#
STANDARD,/
iIA-
o d
F.
i
-iC
g
r Lt!
.
ap,. .t_t
9A<a i
~A Irt~~~r_ (f rit_(_`nf_>"tnflf.-nii 11 I T P"I""C`
I ~1-14_~~
r~~l~i r~r "nrJn l it
i ~ lid VI yv-l I'Ll-~i IVY,. Iii
i
A ! I m~
~ _ u I ne ~ ~i Ih (l
I - I~ I
I
9 geld 'y aq~eecQQ
- N wn a PRELIO~JAAFV PLAT
J R.
C e Hill, i c.
O s v U FOR nM mx•. u
Q N£ m m R. KEN POTTS m tx-~_~ PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
4750 NiCOLS ROAD. CA-AN. - 15- r>.L•. «..e ••^+.e UaOt JaneES AVF 3 • ptOWmgipn, wa 55a3f a p11Sp4-vn
r
i
n,e In+nlr°t`r. 1"}t:F_~nq'~°d"°ate Rl°r rat' --a,nr. IC^C~rir s°,-n°e
IY, 11 V<tlt_..3 ~d1 -1 l.ul_, e-s 1 dIL°AY®>a el./-~IY.~a vd, IB-.+ .°IY
r,~lf-•e_A-1' rvr° }a+n^r n r
I.A411/ l}I'
~m
Iv
t
c a rc a x ~E ~:a a ~e ~ ~x t -
Y «6 is S _
iSr 6, _ S C 7
0 ° R g
7
PRELItAINL'Y 7T
mcn.
w }
b
z~rP{jg"~.~ 3
555 1
R
Iro~iwnaC ~la rl riP=f_~A U'f IT -r' l-r)nhlf°Pl/~f.)'i n''rr~nr
71
-
-
W s
r
N
• _ { f . :a~.:~:::•: Via: ` ~U
: .
J.'. _ ' _ n
v .q a.... aµ+ m ~1
I
M 9 X445 p5m F' fir-
aaa
F
Y ~
n ( e A-JITIQ to James ,
PR€ .IMIU49f' PLAT
ill, inc.
MR. KEN'POTTS PLANNERS l ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
1 alas nreo~s noao. cA®an. mw. s®rxs wa ~u,+cv ave s a.a.~raa.w as+a ws+a-san
lg 4~ ~_f33
ivp inv Pit, ~:x ili: t_sAC)r ~~nrn~~- rsr- -r r.),A, ivt'C7r~i>i n
i11 ~lAI1t) 7-1,~i
0
i
ss A k „
®3
k tp
7 I C1_ r7
I
jAl
S
a
MR.
=ww arse a!c.
9010 i 'AP 9. 8866 - #A-cc
s~ 892.3 AP
_ " 696 6 - e'' - a 889,3
` A P -49 900.0
881.7 \2'
A-pp 689.0 /
-'AP-
' 889
f P-25 7, 894.
_ p~ 8880p.5
L1gg scat I 8860 866.5 \AP-4:
894 0 - f- 89045.0
j AlAP- 10 1 /1
25.6 1. \ P > r
A:F
L t,T AP- -4
r 9159
x~ 9160
L.S, 1
11 fi vv ?T- A .ee_, 12 -
r
AP '19
I 930,6
0 / f
)46.U r ~C
r 24' r { Tt
SAF_
' i / 1F5
J 34.0 y~ AP- i
a .t x5 336,6 r` 92&U
a r 9 O
A-gg - '0-8 \ O~A- y
1
AP;p $ e,-xX
;r 9800 W~~~,~^~~~!!/ rc
f ~ 965.3 F_'iTA,^~
R a3
-zz
\AA L
SUBOECT PARCEL
ceciqah STORM SEWER approved. standard
t :rRLIC plate
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
(RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION)
APPLICANT: HAVEN ENTERPRISES
LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submi~_ted
requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Ridge Haven Addition. T.s
plat consists of fourteen single-family lots on 5.2 R-1-zc"ed
acres located along the south side of Sibley Hills Drive and east
of Highway 13.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently there is an existing
homesite on proposed Lot 12 that will be removed. This
"stovepipe"-shaped lot is now served by a long, shared driveway
with an exception at the northwest portion of the site. The
width at the proposed street right-of-way line is 20' and 50' is
required. Either a Variance will be necessary or all of the lots
will have to be shifted to the east. All other R-1 lot
requirements have been satisfied. The lots vary in size from
12,000 SF to 18,600 SF (stovepipe lot). The gross density of the
plat is 2.7 units per acre. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 have double
frontage on both Sibley Hills Drive and the internal street.
Building setbacks of at least 30' will be required along both
streets. Sibley Hills Drive will be upgraded to also serve the
recently approved Prettyman Addition to the east.
This site consists primarily of open grassland with scattered
deciduous trees found around the existing home and perimeter
property lines. Nearly all of the site will be graded to
provide house pad locations. The land falls quickly from the
east property line to a more gentle slope all the way to the
western property line.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has existing
elevation differentials ranging from a high point of
approximately 858 in the southeast corner of the site to a low of
approximately 788 along the westerly side adjacent to Sibley
Hills Drive. A cut area of approximately 20' is required in the
southeast corner to achieve the proposed house pad elevation.
The remaining portions of the site can achieve proposed house pad
elevations with cut/fills of approximately 2'-5'. The grading
plan proposes slope areas which exceed the maximum allowable 3:1
slope criteria.
The development proposes to intercept site generated storm water
runoff by the storm sewer system in the westerly cul-de-sac. The
development does not adequately address the outlet to the
proposed storm sewer system. The grading plan will need to be
revised to properly identify side lot line drainage swales,
especially on the proposed lots along the southerly and easterly
sides.
The development proposes to remove existing structures from
proposed Lots 12 and 13. The existing well and septic system
will have to be abandoned in accordance with Department of Health
and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards.
Storm water runoff from this site will be conveyed by a storm
sewer system that outlets into the Minnesota River Valley flood
plain. Erosion control measures which limit the amount of
sediment movement into the storm sewer system and the Minnesota
River are required. The following general criteria in the
erosion and sediment control plan need to be addressed prior to
issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval:
Establishment of vegetation, protection of adjacent properties,
and identification of a contact person who will implement and
maintain erosion control measures.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve the development is readily available from the
existing water main in Sibley Hills Drive. The development will
be required to extend the proposed G" water main along Lots 3 and
4 to the northerly boundary of the development. This extension
to the northerly property line will enable the development to
adequately loop the proposed water main system when the existing
water main in the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive is
extended easterly to serve the proposed Prettyman Heights
Addition.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth is not readily
available to serve the development. The development will need to
tie into the existing MWCC trunk sanitary sewer line along the
easterly side of T.H. 13.
The development is required to provide a sanitary sewer and water
main service stub to each of the proposed lots.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development proposes to take
street access from the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive in
one location. This access is then proposed to be extended
southerly to a proposed east/west street which will have a cul-
de-sac on each end.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS: The development propc,~s_-s to
provide sufficient public right-of-way to adequately s°tir~ the
development. No additional right-of-way for Sibley Hills %Yive
along the westerly and northerly sides of the development is
required.
The development will be required to provide appropriate utility
easements for those public utilities constructed outside of the
public right-of-way.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval in accordance with City Special
Assessment Policies in effect at this time:
PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY r
Storm Sewer Trunk $.056/sf 187,569 $10,392
10 Lateral Benefit
Trunk Sanitary Sewer 15.85/ff 259.87 4,119
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $14,511
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. All lots shall be serviced and addressed from the internal
street (cul-de-sacs).
3. The existing homesite and well/septic system shall be removed
or abandoned to City requirements.
4-The development is required to remove the existing well and
septic system in accordance with Department of Health and
Polution Control Agency requirements.
5.Side lot line drainage swales are required to be defined on
the grading plan.
6.An outlet to the proposed storm sewer system is required.
7.The development is required to extend its water main to the
northerly property line for connection to the future
easterly extended water main in Sibley Hills Drive,.
8.The development is required to execute the appropriate
"waiver of assessment' for future street assessments
associated with the easterly extension of Sibley Hills
Drive.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Tay
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required 'nigh water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
g7 ~ /
lj{~, II f
r ,
t 1 '
r~ iEkSTAiE q9%
' / ~ LOSF SPUR ~ it ^ 44,: ~ RG
/ CDUNFRY
cLUa
r
t ~44E
r
L!
'~-.r ~C OACMM N~f ,m
r nK5 * ~
R 3 N~1
;ACMMAry m
'.CSR
i
1 Z
r r
o Q 0 4 w!e
0
Qr \
~L~~.
sll~
b' ° }f~~~I (
J~ In
m 1~ 'gym
ir.
Lo 60
yl N
Hill M5I.lt rig I fi[ -'~rvi~~ " o
it fi +J ~S r x ~i 115 ( i t1
t t ► 3ti! i 1 # S gg .I
S `a
It
!$!d 1 11- I ;I o~ i 277
I i SS t~l f~ ~;l 1~ i Zi i ~ tee '#!'l gga # tl
41
fir,
i . 1 7
iM NARY Y S ~ ~tP' PIAT, pRA` /'+hun ty,~~g~i...d[.~/L.ERp3lpN
n AF
nIDG )1 Y
C4 ~eT an4 EM I'+fkfa w,-.+,m.. c-S3.u c # Z. Y I
i
Z
^ (pF1 Z
v C 4 0° 6 n 4 "i nny.
9 ¢ 1
CY
g
4== ry~
KNO
tE y iit i ttt tx1 •i" I ;I~ } ~1..~ .«s{ 4 7{i I 0~ ! j
)IF ek ;I~ r~' `ri Ik 2 I tF ~r1 I ~1 t= ~ ~ r P ~ ' ~ ' M ~
k f
Fj
i
I ~
i E ~Y~ ~ ~ ti.,l ~I ~ gg fat, p ~ ~a as ~~;,nl ~ i'~?~ .I (-.•-f""
x r i~ tt jar t14 I Ill ~ -
i S+~
r
as E
4 I OLAT, t i W u eT , : '?Pf9r,ON ¢ +
i
~ z
r 4Y
h
. , ~nl A ~ ~ a ' ssq rR a a G N . ,Q+(1~ ((1 r(
z n l
o C
Cl)
Gry . r T x
m sa d )
i
~;r i ate, -
T
1 e-° I
co E.4 m 4L 4i
~71i Zoe ~ x~ y , i I
(,J c -
'F •t ~ U `\I
co
0 o u a
X-7VI .0
x a l..=m t +
p r: +r
1i lp 7 +et~ 3 j! ai 3~i 1 ~1ii~jjta~~ ( (I ( I
{ "di 11.1i # i+ Of rt 3 li X} } Stye
Ifj! (1 I~it 1( (ie i i1 AFC`; [ l(ici3; I -iia I o~ I e1o=
S~~?fit
t r i 1} b i ! E~ 4 j 1 A d ( Fi e'
rP
E ,
i~: it eli ~ g } t o p a
• t.
J}
.3
L- 1110, 1
t~' ,Pi.AT ®RA..jH(• U EROSION
r
0 + - _ ..tom LCD D
1
„ A ~ ~ Y'YIDGf~i'iAV t:N
/ - - DST SF Jft
COUNTF
CLUE
JN CLUB
,LAKE 7Ltt7
_ a
4
Y I
A.
ia `v
~ J!
Nq I
i a
r I 01 ~ ,c ,
N-C
I
M AST . -
C -'PART., - t a
f
60
H -b ! )ST SPUR
s aL . ~ P 1r"~ ' COUNTRY r sr
CLUB
/ H -d
FOST NO 3
a
w
I ~H,
2
l~ ~H
_ f
f/ - s eR - t
7 K r 24 o
oor
DP-17
1}=f 80.0
F
r s• ._r F RF~991.9 DP-
$74
n -k
eP-
- r
0
a= 78
m.
A.
Y
e 4.
[c .i.." ]c d y..n id_ _ s
- - MASTER PLAN
N
DE PA ''Tr„~
N 0
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (UNISYS PA ADDITION)
APPLICANT; UNISYS CORPORATION/CITY OF EAG
LOCATION; E 1/2 OF SECTION 9
EXISTING ZONING; (RESEARCH D DEVEZ__~ _,'E"N )
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING; APRIL 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT; APRIL 14, 1988
REPORTED BY; PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been s_;,itted
requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Unisys Park Addition. This
205-acre site was previously platted in 1983 as the Sperry Park
Addition containing two lots---one allowing multiple buildings on
a single lot and the other for the City's water tower. This
proposed replat will create four lots (including the water tower
lot) that will allow individual ownership for each building/lot
if ever sold in the future. This is currently the situation with
the consolidation facility that is being sold to a pension fund.
There will not be any construction as a result of this plat.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The existing Sperry Park plat does not
identify all ponding and utility easements necessary to protect
the existing and future City public utility needs in this area.
The City is requiring a minimum 20' wide easements for a single
utility line, such as a water main, and additional easement
widths as required by the depth and a minimum of a 10' separation
between the utility line. The development is required to
dedicate ponding and storm sewer easements necessary to protect
the existing as well as future City storm sewer needs as
identified in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The
development will be required to verify the existing location of
the public utility and provide the appropriate easement.
The proposed Unisys Park Addition has identified two existing
city well sites through easements on the proposed plat.
Additional well sites are required on the Unysis site based on
the ultimate needs of the water supply system throughout the City
of Eagan. Unisys Corporation presently has not executed an
agreement with the City which provides for these future well site
needs. The city presently is updating their existing
Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan which will
identify future well site needs on the Unisys property.
Current County guidelines for the right-of-way widths for both
Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road have increased from the
previously dedicated widths to a 75' half right-of-way width
requirement.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City
special assessment policies:
PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY T
Future Storm Sewer Trunk $.083/sf 7,947,580 $659,649
6 Lateral Benefit 15.85/ff 2,600 41,210
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
6 Lateral Benefit 21.60/ff 1,054 22,766
Trunk Water Main
200/177 Trailway 13.00/ff 292 3,786.93
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $772,855
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: UNISYS CORPORATION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on Se tember 15, 1987 shall be complied with.
Al, Bl, B2, B3, and B4.
2. The development is required to provide the City of Eagan,
either by appropriate easements on the plan or by executing
the appropriate Unisys/City of Eagan agreement, which will
assure the City that future well site needs on the Unisys
property will be provided for.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE O
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfall its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
o- d 6
101
uc IIM11F LNF ,1 A I ITIN ( j
r'e I ~ 1 I.~
it
~ t
Z 1 x X:
Z ~
N '
q e:
C1 Itl l".' ttt
rt
Illh* a.
e , .
r
8 M 8 8^ 9 9 m 6° n M -
. » e.e n. ~1•. R5
d{: f.
°
r_~. L- e L
ANK,Ea , , COODLF.~ rOAUC"; ( r^ 20 ~ z N
.
SEWS TRUNK - 7,947,880 .F.
• AIL 3788.93 F.F.
a ARCM 1RAC ALLIANCE UQUN7,77 SURVEY UNtZfS
AND
EAGAN A,
rylict ° -aRY PLAT
?:SLUr7 ti~aCiP"~i_INF i~ Avt)IT1ON c~• ~i )
r. I ~ I
_I x f
n II 7I / / -
1 t / / 1 p
r U II ~ `1
rM1 li 1 11 ~ / F
PROPOSED LOT 3
PROPOSED LOT 2
ft 1t
1
°II 1 ,
T
p II
41
PROPOSED LOT 4 ~
1 f~`, r ___1 _ L
• ev w.n .i ww'e.en a •,a~•ases w ,w.e.~ i ® ~ i~- 1
aaaa~s-
DOODLE, ~ ROAD G^ FD. PKL 28 a N
11 7!i
e B
4 It
+ x BOUNDARY SURVEY 1~
ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE UNISYS PARK ~)~meS R.I 11II, inc.
.n....
EESrFNGi EeRSrsJevEmRs
a~ AND EAOAN,MN. - a1+N
PRELIMINARY FLAT ^ ° -
P
>t.l'. ti7 tIFd OF_rl_IMF 1? i AC(`I
`t
gg
._j
II ~ tl4 -r- a f _ [ ~
I ( I j
-I 1 (l / ; ~j
r I.. _
a ~ ~ 11 ! ~ I
t
li PROPOSED L07 3 j LOT 2
~ t
II E r r E
C, `4, ! °I
PROPOSED LOT #
II > ~ I I
II r°
j{" 1
I
_ DAMN. e.E D~)OMLF 4r?AU D FT, fV28
ATE LATER AL B BENEFIT TRUNK - 1054
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT TROUNi< - E
ARCHITECTURAL AL t IANGE BOUNDARY SURVEY UNISYS PARK
4i 11 111 ' I AND ESA-AN,MN. as
PRELIMINARY PLAT _IFi
a
NUN CLUb a .
IAKEi~ N .srl l b 7 j'
r~4u.
11,688 0
o. , L t Sut,J! ktitaGE/, „ 8(16.9 ~ ~(y~ 0-h • ~ i~
_ l r I
w p and„gawk r9 C 876.0
V t t
24'
878.-
0- 8800 OP-2,,,
874,0,
BT~ 4 i
w
98,0 70Za c-i c-k l'> rs•
't bp
/ Tl9,Y- 1 I I e 875.0
di Gr I~~,.e~rr:,4 •t•: 478.0
C-c
C DP 2"e
C D ?t r 874 6
°s®ra ~s :f CP-5 8.
` J 1 1~0 1 873.0
G.d 't. CP-10 wl
Br7Z0 ~i a, Lp 26~/ gg0P
CP-7 CP-2 rd rj 1. t 8Jt
765.0 823.5
7ti9.~ o 829.7 r~•
rt
'a Z
r~ 4 C°Q
CP-12- CP-i ~i-UP~23
826.5 825.0 893,0
• 8976
819.6 [D-c ~i 17 - 829.7
~CP-6 ~4
p
790,7
806.0
78711 Q DP 22
AP-27 i'~I I
99E 2
796.3 880.0
118044 1 11.
a -3 ).P-6
CP- 11 844,0 I ( 7r 0 1 . JP-1
t
9b4 ..i rl r F', .1h~R`1 JP-2~'°` a9iJ.d' I 8800 ~
T.
:SUBJECT PARCEL
®t., of eagan STORM -7 R approved: standard
r. plate
L PUBLIC
r ,~z VIORKS
MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
H
SUN CLUES R_
L Aa
I
1 i
m n r .e 4
H
THE Ft L 8. ACRES
N L-3
C - H 2 c
C-D
c
TA14,tNVhRi C-G li nLt( 1
AGLTiti
15„
~CEL
i 1.
zj+, 1
DEPAHTMENT]
M
CUxd~p as
fi l ti 6j~rs .0 33 PL 48 217 .o
17777,77
I TREFPC N
7 `?d0 Iii k ~ ~ 2
`
_ rtes u J ~ StlC
I lI r ( 4MEEA
6
~ f1=;``'•- „K~ P! ,163.0
d2Ai A
'
30l ! u~ ;T4 K.. _
jw-s 1
d o
A > K.w. 10 S - r
r
np~ e z~ 1xctO: ~a. , sP r ~g o
xa C . 6"//` rtiP
6 re.4
°
r2. Mxa 69~dw '12'1930 - 574✓r6
.
f 2 ^
81.0 E' Twf4t A
..ti81840
b SATE
(32 kta DA r' r I
`a 1 6/ 820 X 5d.2/b7,Q ~T , 2MO I:
410 '0
r~,41 92 d8718to S5 an 51 T rtkOd
r 89, Iu3n ob .e~','~r ® ~®ie,es50 Xvy1 C' 24'
!c -)4041760 t$• i lQ4 r 3 CEhTt~ 44
100
d4 7 / 88.0
, rho, k _ ~rnu
95 ff I__ h
q, T acK{ K r__ Fl~i
if22 J-
(z
7tV 96.0
e 1 \ 1'
~pc(f C~ -43184.0 HA4l
PARCEL
F1
city of eagan WATER approved: standard
plate 4:
PUBLIC
4 RS MASTER PLAN
' DEPART
CITY OF EAG
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DEN POND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: ROSEWOOD CORPORATION
LOCATION: 1/2 OF SECTION
EXISTING ZONING: R- (MULTIPLE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1988
REPORTED BY. PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted
requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Alt1-.1 Pond Addition
consisting of 226 rental townhouse units on 31.2 acres located
between Coachman Road and the Unisys campus. 7-his site is zoned
R-4 (Multiple) and a rezoning to a Townhouse district (R-3) will
not be required since the current zoning does allow multiple-
dwelling buildings. This proposal is also consistent with the
City°s most recent Land Use Plan that designates this area for 6-
12 units per acre.
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet will be required since more
than 225 units are proposed.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is primarily open grassland with
a stand of trees near the southeast portion of the site tax?^ere a
ponding area naturally occurs. The site is surrounded by
townhouses and the Coachman Oaks Condominiums to the west and the
Four Oaks quad-homes to the north. The recently improved ten-
acre Quarry Park to the south was designed to accommodate the
needs of the large number of multiple dwelling units in the
immediate area. An outdoor pool and tot lot will be provided
adjacent to the recreation/office building.
SITE PLAN: The site plan has changed slightly from the exhibits
attached to this report in an effort to eliminate staff concerns
about the access points onto Coachman Road. The new plan has a
single street extending from Four Oaks Road on the north toward
the south connecting to Coachman Road opposite of Snowflake
Drive. As a result of this revision and the increased ponding
area needed for site runoff, Building 16 (six units) has been
eliminated.
The overall gross density for the 226 units is 7.43 units per
acre. All setbacks for R-3 units were required to be consistent
with similar projects. The lot coverage is 17%; R--3 and R-4
projects allow 20%.
ALDE FOND ADDITION
Thirty-four buildings are proposed---twenty-two eight-plexes,
three six-plexes, eight four-plexes and the recreation center
near the Snowflake Drive entrance. Each building will be platted
on an individual lot with all common areas being maintained by
the developer.
The building exterior will have prefinished~ siding but the
colors have yet to be determined. Each unit has its own heating
and cooling system, as well as laundry hookups. A private garage
with space for another car in front of it will satisfy the City's
parking requirement for multiple dwelling units.
A conceptual landscape plan was submitted that listed sizes and
species of the proposed plant material for a portion of the
project. A detailed plan for the entire site will be required
prior to final plat approval. Additional material along Coachman
Road should be provided for the privacy of the adjacent units to
be consistent with other multiple residential projects that have
recently been approved.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading plan submitted
with this application proposes cut and fill areas ranging from a
fill of approximately 15' around Pond CP-3 in the southeasterly
corner of the development to a cut of approximately 17' at the
proposed entrance from Four Oaks Road along the northerly side.
The proposed grading is contained within the limits of the
development. All proposed slope areas appear to meet City Codes
and standards.
Site generated storm water runoff is proposed to be intercepted
by an internal storm sewer system and conveyed to the City storm
sewer system. The northerly portion of the site is proposed to
drain into the existing system in Four Oaks Road. The
development is proposing a small ponding area at the southeast
corner of Coachman and Four Oaks Road. This small ponding area
will restrict the runoff from the site to capacities which the
existing City storm sewer system can accommodate. The remaining
portion of the site is proposed to drain into Pond CP-3. Pond
CP-3 is identified as a ponding area in the City's Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan. The development is proposing to encroach below
the recommended 'nigh water elevation identified in the City's
Comprehensive Plan along the westerly side of the ponding area.
The development is proposing to redefine the ponding area in such
a fashion that the lost storage volume on the westerly side of
the pond is replaced by an equal volume in the southeast corner
of the development. The development is proposing to fill in the
area where the existing outlet to Pond CP-3 exists. The
development will be responsible for reconstructing the 5 cfs
outlet to Pond CP-3-
A preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan was
submitted as a part of this application. Erosion control
measures are required which will limit the amount of sediment
entering Pond CP-3 and eventually discharging into the Minnesota
River flood plain. The following general criteria need to be
addressed in greater detail before a grading permit is granted
or a final plat is approved: Vegetation establishment, timing of
erosion control measures, construction of sediment basins, and a
contact person who is responsible for the construction,
implementation and maintenance of erosion control measures for
the development is required to be identified on the grading,
drainage and erosion control plan.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve the development is readily available from the
existing trunk water mains located in Coachman Road and Four Oaks
Road. The development will be required to furnish a separate
water service to each unit.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity to serve
the development is readily available from the existing main in
Four Oaks Road, the existing sanitary sewer main along Coachman
Road and the existing 15" sanitary sewer trunk which crosses the
southerly portion of this site. The development will be
responsible for televising the existing sanitary sewer and storm
sewer lines which cross the southerly portion of the site prior
to any construction activity being allowed, with the tapes of the
televising being delivered to the Public Works Department. The
aq
development will be responsible for any damages which occur to
any existing City public utility line as a result of construction
activities. The developer is also responsible for maintaining
minimum covers on the existing utility lines as well as the
reconstruction of the existing structures to accommodate his
proposed grading. Each proposed unit requires its individual
sanitary sewer service.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The site is proposed to be served by
a public street which connects Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road.
All units will be served from this internal public street.
During the upgrade of Coachman Road, a curb cut opposite Letendre
Road was provided for access to this site. The applicant is not
receptive to this provided access location and prefers a Coachman
Road access southerly of the existing curb cut approximately 250'
south of Letendre Road. This proposed location is opposite a
private drive which serves the apartment complex along the west
side of Coachman Road. The Letendre St./Coachman Road access
point would involve the construction of a cul-de-sac street to
serve the southerly portion of the site.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The applicant is proposing to
dedicate sufficient public right-of-way for the proposed internal
public street. Sufficient right-of-way for Coachman Road and
Four Oaks Road has been provided with previous platting
processes. The development is required to dedicate the
appropriate ponding easement for Pond CP -3 to incorporate the
proposed high water elevation of 850.5. The development will be
required to provide appropriate utility easements for those
public utilities which presently exist on the site as well as the
proposed public utilities which are constructed outside of public
right-of-way.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval and in accordance with the
city's special assessment policies in effect at this time:
PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMT
71 Storm Sewer Trunk $.0086/sf 287,416 $ 2,448
70 Lateral Benefit Storm
Sewer Trunk 26.00/ff 1,040 27,040
8 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 15.85/ff 1,220 19,337
323A Lateral Benefit Trunk
Water Main 21.60/ff 358 7,733
Future Trailway 6.50/ff 2,045.43 13,295
Future Trailway 13.00/ff 508 6,604
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $76,457
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
wtih the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
S. Easements and Rights-of-belay
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
i
A C14
I
W.
-
y you a. ~ -
p
FOUR QAKS r~AD
1
i
L A p\
m
G
m~ pv~~ w
I o, ~ I
i ~ O 10 1~ I ~q i
o z f
o n
n ( o
I A
b
o ~ c
a
I `
~p w
I
b{
A~ w
1 ~ .a
LE TENDR.E
D po
'R-4 C m C rn m m p o o p 5
z :z
1° (A ~ U U n P
mm m
v_+> xr a
O N m m rf ~ (!r ~
c c z. ~ A x rn o~ ~ f Q
1.- . ff .a~ cy A A ~ m
to
o 7~ ~ m m z r A N A
R o m A
~ 1i d N e? Fa t? C7
a c r _
w
W a Z N-
Z
I
I
PRELI U ILI LN "JT
ALDEN
I
10 13
21
, 71i
L-j
i K,
J.
r ~ rn
IIE
iYF,.+AL SER,wE DE-if r'..r7T
I!
1 - #
PF -f -AT OF
. x
2L
4
14
777;0, 1
-C9liRT---~~ l~ AtBsld i T_ `n / P3
Z7
w
3
du
J
- ° r- - SITE DATA EVELOPER
r TOTAL AREA id. R£3 JCTKMB Iw_
1._a `3 ROAAB
a w • r"-TARP '®"ER EASEMENT 4.: 3 - .3
a® a - .'H 32 .
c_ w recr E ~ O 3
EIGHT UNITa BUI NET El. __S S ENG.N£._R
LI UNITS M' =30 EY `HC. U.TEIG ,NaC,
j-'°---~`--" -I ...E MINNIJU 55432
N. - 3.4335557 PHONE 90-934O
LSCATtc',' "IAP "OTE
ACK 30'
S.: L ' IT OF E 1 ST !
UNIT atxixma SEE ! FOR - _ URY UTIL- LAY
r7 an ME L,.. I E .3MINARY BR, PLAN
SURVEY -MG
DO L~,.1
EMNWM No- Rob.
-
~u
~ ✓ k L l
r «
jj~
~ w
g
.
«
a
~r
6Apgg /
9 oggrl,) es ,
6
P A
'
ELI IARY PLAT OF
- Z
2on
444 t
2 f k~
~T U~xs
' A
r 3 ~ / ,f p Y
6
. •
_
Illy
.ice +SeT -^t", wi
l I
_ SITE DATA C I VELDPER
TOTAL AREA Sr.2E ACRES ;r XA \ . 1w_
t, 1." ACRES ssli3AO _
tt` CSAMTAM'3EMER EASEMENT 4.33 ACRES E• I.-.-3231
OCAO
N n M n AREA r.so ACRfs -YOR E `sIP
T AREA 28 ea ACRES
i w Ic EI®HT UNIT WfUf 4 LNMG UNITS a32 A WALLET alwvtyoft w- OLT- M i .
M. C INOUSMAL. 90kUYARO 41r - Y a NE
NSITT so- WRNEAA .I IS, 53132
®U aMLf, MN. SOW P9YNaf 790-1940
.,QfaE 890°7790
NOTE
LOCATIO WNIMw sfr .C% so'
, L STREETS S L ®E CM OF EABAN STANOAR09 Wy[(ffJJ
% ITT Ram-r- SEE St 2 FOA PAfURRRARY UTLRY L.Y T
SEE S., 3 ECN MINAfiY ".0.4 PLAN .....a.
IV" l.nG
f j Eagan _LEY o" :~T. zs.IaeT
/ N
Ac wr
r z ss.
t_
roesr Lwn vRAr.uNa
TRUNK 287,416 S.F.
STORM SEWER SORM T SEWER TI ' LATERAL BENEFIT _ 1040 F.F.
®L JAY PL AI
a
zais As -
w
20
1 f I _ t t ' I
12
_0 A
u
x N•
w
1 220 F.F. F.
VATEsR L,~;- L , t: 1 -358 F.F.
OUN CLUO r'~ ST tip
tLAKE t t t V:.L~El ~ CAN 111E -
~{~t ~j ACRES COIJ TRY
J~_ <<F A-
TREF'FLE A( F. S
'i- - .a E Y
r
e 3
rP~LO
PARK'....
.
w 9
N
r /
Tl}~'rl7
N-C
/off t
f FFR(- 5
Rf '
ADDiTION
1. s
l ;
R,
j ` RIDGE
_ ~e _-ACEL
. _ r
1 of eagan approved: standard
.-'UBLlC SANITARY SEWER _
2 "IORKS MASTER PLAN
DDEPARTMENTI
D-b
f D-0 a
! L~~ 6 C)
30.
D-c D-d
24.
CAP-37
D-~ _ D - f' -'-880.0
"
-j 3
cC -j
719,7
E e ; r L.S.-4s,~:
C-e i
C
79- C
87
t G F x r 875
I
d
~a• MCP 1~ i _
7900p' ;ta -2
802.0 87 F.8
- CP-2
i 823.5
t j 829.7 tot
61 C P 1-! C-P f
8M5 f~'a 825.0. na
P.
_ R
r
f ,.3
3 of eagan
i v • t
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
k r,T - I IZ'{ 4SIHHOOL
s 82.Of 2.C _3.p 6
Ige
J T `~R' 6
f h6~1 , l - = CQt 4 7 ` 45.8/
1 .tJq 951) 59.0 rP64:t
LEVATED STCRA(
ri4 0 4 C ' 99.3/u7e~ :W. L. I0 59
; V O
E
•
EK....T
/ f
NQUST IA 'eG RK c~ "Zc...a.:69.3/84.0DlT
\ r N Y/7/ 74.C
876/1 p L RIQGE
8Y 63918 , a /93.0 57.9/70 16.3/62.0 4/.7.~
,,u 7S E,vr(8 ~O '0 J
R,7/
3kC
C I 7D TREA~'~ VT f ( SU E t,688/84.0 PLANT
SITE ATN ADD ft
ti (32U.G%D,), l,-lEIGHrSall
91 r5.1 f 92.0 4 •lC 56.2/67.` - ~,~D
90
1 1, f
92 69.5/8I 1,0 / I L30-141
05.c
93 60.4/780 18 30" It U
own&
Sam" mum arcs i.w ~r►-alrsr
lU VlEN is-. 1 r r . ~a. _ a , _T- X6/720
FIG 3
1 of eagan
WATER approved : rtC;ard
plate 7#:
LJ ®'U L1C
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DE A T ENT
t
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE P~~'f_`.T
(EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 3RD ADDITION)
APPLICANT: OPUS CORP/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE
LOCATION; N 1/2 OF SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING.: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING. APRIL 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been subm°tte;i
requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Eagandale LeMay Lake _ d
Addition, consisting of one 2.3 acre lot for a retail convenience
center, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign, an
automobile service/car wash, a drive-thru food facility, and 3.2
beer sales.
This overall plat consists of 8.1 acres including portions of
both the Eagandale LeMay Lake lst and 2nd Additions. The 5.8
remaining acres will be platted as an outlot for future
development.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently the site is open, flat
grassland. Perimeter berming and Greenspire Linden trees were
installed at the time Eagandale Place was constructed in order
to provide a boulevard effect.
The four-sided brick building is approximately 16,000 SF and all
NB district Code requirements have been satisfied. Access 4-S
provided in two locations off of Eagandale Place and a one-',gay
out is near the southeast portion of the site. The potentll
drive-thru facility is along the east side of the building with a
south to north movement. The owner of the building also
constructed the neighborhood center near Lexington Avenue and
Diffley Road. This building will be more similar in style,
though, to the Thomas Lake Center along Cliff Road---both have
gabled roof lines. A white dryvit (stucco-like) surface below
the green metal mansard roof will contain the building sig age.
The major tenants include Kunz Oil and Peoples Plus. Sinc t-,-
rear of the building has frontage along Eagandale Boulevard,
additional plant material will be necessary to screen this area.
Understory trees, staggered conifers, and eventually large shrub
beds should be added to be consistent with other retail projects
in the City. This can be accomplished with the Final Plat
submission.
The 25'-tall interior lighted -pylon sign will be very similar to
the one along Lexington Avenue. It contains 125 S of signage
area per side.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was
previously rough graded using excess material from the I-35E
construction and under a proposed development plan for Eagandale
LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. The proposed grading plan shows cut
areas of approximately 5' in the building pad location area to
approximately 9' in the north parking lot area. The proposed
site grading will have no adverse affect on the adjacent
properties. The site iias an existing 4'-6' high berm and 3"-4"
trees planted along the westerly and south sides adjacent to
Eagandale Place.
The development proposes to intercept all site generated runoff
in an internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff to the
existing City storm sewer system in Eagandale Place. The
existing system was adequately sized to receive runoff from this
area. Staff advises the applicant to revise the proposed parking
lot drainage in the north parking lot to drain to the curb line
along the north side versus a central low point as proposed.
The main water quality issue for this proposed site is the impact
of the site development on the water quality of LeMay Lake.
Phosphorous loading models estimate that 2.4 pounds of
phosphorous per year are currently being exported to LeMay Lake.
After development, an estimated 16.2 pounds of phosphorous per
year will be exported to the lake, assuming that Outlot A will
have a similar percent of impervious area as Lot 1. Under this
assumption, when developed, this site will increase phosphorous
loading to LeMay Lake by approximately 2.4%.
The following erosion and sediment control general criteria need
to be addressed before a grading permit is issued or final plat
approval: Establishment of vegetation, protection of adjacent
properties, construction access routes identified, and a contact
person needs to be identified on the plan who will implement and
maintain the erosion control practices should problems arise.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve this development is readily available from the
existing water main located in Eagandale Place and has been
stubbed to the property line in a location conducive to
development.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth to serve
this site is readily available from an existing sanitary sewer
line in Eagandale Place. The sanitary sewer has been stubbed to
the property in a location which is conducive to development.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take
street access from Eagandale Place in three locations. The
proposed driveway locations along the westerly boundary of this
site are required to be lined up with the existing driveways;
which serve the LeMay Lake apartment site. The third access
location is proposed in a location centered on the easterly
property line of the proposed site. This driveway location will
serve as a common entry point for the proposed development and
future development on the balance of Outlot A.
The applicant is proposing a one-way exit from this site at the
southeast corner. The idea of a one-way exit from the site in
this location is proposed because the southerly parking area is
at the rear of the building. Due to the existing street
configuration of Eagandale Place, there is very little, if any,
potential user traffic which will be coming from the southeast.
A "T" access point configuration in the southeast parking lot
would provide a less confusing traffic circulation maneuver than
the proposed "Y" configuration. The proposed site plan does not
provide sufficient room between the westerly gas pump island and
the parking lot curb for proper traffic circulation around the
pump islands. With a car using the westerly pump island, there
is only sufficient room for a single vehicle to pass between the
car and the proposed parking lot curb.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY"-PERMITS. Current County guidelines call
for dedication of a 75' half right-of-way and restricted access
for Lone Oak Road.
The City will require the development to dedicate sufficient
right-of-way along Eagandale Place to provide at least 8° of
boulevard distance between the existing sidewalk and the right-
of-way for Eagandale Place. The previous platting processes for
the Eagandale Le May Lake Ist and 2nd Additions failed to identify
the need for the additional right-of-way along the westerly side
of the proposed development.
The grading plan indicates that slope easements will be required
from the easterly adjacent property.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval in accordance with City ,'3 cial
Assessment Policy #82-1:
PROD. DESCRIPTION RATE QTY I
28 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 21.60/ff 211.17 $4,56
Future Trailway 13.00/ff 355.17 4,611
Future Lone Oak Road 111.70/ff 270.17 31,29
TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $4047
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
EAG DALE L Y LAKE 3RD ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on Septembr 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot.
3. Additional plant material will be added to the southern
property line area to adequately screen the rear side of the
building.
4. The development is required to limit the phosphorous
transport offsite into LeMay Lake to predevelopment levels.
5. The proposed one-way street on the easterly side of the
building is required to be a minimum of 18' wide.
6. The proposed "Y" traffic circulation configuration in the
southeast corner of the proposed site is required to be
revised to a "T" configuration.
7. A revision to the pump island configuration at the westerly
side of the building is required to accommodate the
additional right-of-way requirements along Eagandale Place.
An 8' separation is required between the back of sidewalk
and street right-of-way.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainages and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high r~c
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval..
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
- 11
4 ExSid 'n f94
~ ST .SPUR f ~ i
/ COUNTfii A
7,1 i
! /I wuAY[ LF _
1 h• _ a.
' 16
z
tom'" _
JVF
LL~,~~OUARRY ARK
r w ~ ,
I ^
Y
t
13sE_` , _q H t S, ti H~
r P 4 f a~~ j rs; `fw
i
>f . d
ak ' t F1 CF p x e
k ?
WYN. AM
t
CO ~.NY 'h l p"t
coki
fEFe q AeAH9 rd - - t~
i 0 r,
~-t
ID Le
} VtOS ra~OV3 NDdOO i paM
c NVld 3115 AF3vNI ll3tld t VZVld kv0 3NOl L,VZV-Ald )fVO 3NOl ' F
3JY ld 31YaYYDY3 _ ~y -•.°'•n WStl em's-.•-- .
e
OL 6L wr3w
.E 3as IJLJL~
,bL OE x.Owd
=101 D Vd
eE of wV3V r3w x
,oe of 3rns
DS HOW
~Hnes, °1Y
axalEtE f \ 1
r.nfnt.N+v
a3Yk'103Y EM~Y8t3S ~ ~ l 1
03i0dOtl4
Lot ,rtDx f MnY,f ~
g 4"CwYN
Mt aW-",
'a3aA6Yd DMkYVd ~ i ~n", ~
LOL 03- 3w OFEktl Yd _
~E no Et Y3YV "aT %
1
'ft t0004t Y3tlY 31tE I
Owavn
vivo 311S 63SOdOdd C 1
o
r f j]-jj-
f, r
I
i
dw~a LfY3
foaow -ooi avow uvo 3N01
LOW OAK ROAD (CO. RD. 26} _ - _
EAST 80IMQ LA1~ '
h3 i 13 $ <nFZiK_E
sG'cl)CF'a4
ra ~ a
a _ - r„>+ETU,c.rn H Plant List
'SX'tR.e S
!T1 Gly. Cwnnq+ f L.+ W_ Bix. past R-k.
GRI. Gryct LNDEr{ 4' ba b -
Crt./SSY Si.I.CK
1 j + GNp(E+}ARRY
iitt i 1 PktA l+1AY..A pp-irTA
(5-CAAVE YS CWT } i ,.,>b.. j
HONEY SUEKLE t tt '~T :1 ~ ~ 'r' ~ ft P~f-~` ~8
444444 t
a t" Idr .r - t ' i { i { i r { ~ 31Mi✓mL. i-' -
3 C~Oa• D'A+.AAIE~ - .,e, YT t ' F ~ ! t -s.,
R/OOrT y ~f''LfMOtllf G 35Y .K. GhOAEBGRRY i:P4T
~ x ir-lix E - K'il i" POT xSGF A A 1CY AAPA
6 . ; dq 7 to Ac ^}O1NE t-X JRAIOE W POT
' KE. ~ ~ r ~ ~ i 3 t i - ...ADEL®MVS f'KY.,KDRANGE
L
S _ [ _ - - N Ga_D uAt^E SR'iRW rY P9f
` ~ j ~ ~-P ~ ~ S u gurfAwA
` ~ 1 ) a 7 1 _ _
...RF u'vor
3s - a*ia4Y 1- ~ 1 ~
~n
r ro7 ! 7 ~ - - ~ 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ Mm.Kae u
_ d ! r S i Sca w „a+ 'ER 3 &A, PM
Z .•*j { vv~-i RU3. ~&MA `SGPiDr A'
~Jy~~ i ti 1
t
f.<A1A[:A 1 RX.'i ~ b-@ f 7 7 ; fx" LMY~rLY t' ftT
r t
'VZ•(Jy„ >=f~ n HEHEROL/.4.is
s {
_ -A~KHiL444 - 1 1 3 n NwvE 3-1-X151 ,14G 6REENJf3RE L *;,EN
{R AVLCJ "ARN S A.1. R-lN(IN BEO$
! ( VMV, m "`nnn - _ ` EKE BE RGiY _~Ly ~'GTNT
t R q,X,y, a ~„y Xa 61 ViRE u A -GRGRN w' BBC
0 11-wELNSYrRE'
:.KNi4i5 PM1A405 4iEt7 SGLEND
SPRUCE
i i „ ° k• $5f~ 1s ryANDrA JUNiPEq dV'DM
i q i z ✓J aPERU$ SABNA SUNPrA
q Yt•11Y p•+itt
` HEMER OCALL 1$
I
~ bar .~.yY {
~ 6NERc 'p
Sr,
• r. U B?l ~B
4
.m.
sEO r•1 $ g
H. .
. _ $ 4 d * a LO
« s j
f,;
$ 3 ~ '
a - ` ~
S
® L a =2.
h;~j~
J ~ r ~ ~ I u
3 ~ ~~~~L
Y ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ L,
, 1
1 1 ~
~ ,3 i i
~ _
r
{ ~ < ..w
~ -
~ _
~
~ ~ ~f
3
~i -
_
_a. ~ - ~
-r~
i
r
~ 4 9
~ ~ i2
~ ~
L___i
--1 ~ ; C
~
* ~ ~
31. ~
a
! 1e
j
it
- ~
T.~,
- _~l a
is
i
m
f
h ~ ~ ~
r
' 1
s
I~
~
~ ~
w `
TONE OAK ROAD (CO, fl0. 28) EAST 40-0 LANE
y ATE LATERAL BENEFIT
-77 1-7 1 ~I 0,
TRUNK - 211.17 F.F.
fi TRAIL ~ 355.17 F .F.
jh~
~y
? x PROF )5 Died.,. SITE DATA
l 7
WTE AREA 344, 0 tF
0 VAW .
AREA ?8.6 t2 01,
P
~ A.Kwo RKMdII REOWtED 14P
PARK.0 PROVDED:
""'D 144
u
NAMACAP 2
y « I TOTAL 107
e enr ' - i ~ 6UX.Df14:
a" T i4.
l` ..n Y _ ~ nI REAR 9D. of
4 PARKWO COT:
f ONT 20 20
E
i WE
REAR 24 M
' xa I
f
£AOANDAtE PLACE
s
r I I k2A ? NP OAle 1 PIELIMINARY SITE PLAN
_7- j i
R #
_ i j c - - Y EAGAM, AL d )TA F
A l l
a s
e . gyp e9Sg; ~ ~ f
fill
ai"'_
«x
14
p V
OWMER \i , O 4 - =ZF F~
yR p
• m
_ T
rTl
r ~ t
Ll 4
xre _ y
or ~ t ~
>N
A OD
f
10 f
SHOT TITLE
a O
p~ iI.,F ~ SO2 ~AMO~R > a Om I ~
T O O CC m
a 65~ T N
~ O C M \
fi
m c r e ' ti.d
111
„r,1END{?TA ~ NTSA~
rl
"`COST SPUR
COUNTRY
CLUE# 46Qt72q ,;era ;C i_
u
~p J
v
f. ~
t
e..r
r7TREFF,
49.2/
Tr w
1 458/
910 b7
3 °a
E4E 11ELD S T C AE u.5 Hp TAC
f 10 N.W.. l06y t r te, w, 5ERViCE - ~ 23 77.f
680
-2) ON
12-
330 579/710 4e 3 02u 9 4 41s7p' 4, ' OQ 300 l a
20" 7a X70 24 o
S rt.- _ t a
2.0 ~s
r 1',
7 ,t aE ukrGEN~~
553 7?4r It tyy,T Kh..d ~
P110
6 11 M..
Tc,v of eagan approved :standard
WATER plate 4:
PUBLIC
WORKS _ `
DE PART rr .
CITY OF GAN
SUBJECT. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ENrM a'te
REZONING
PRELI INARY° PLAT (SILL ADDITION)
APPLICANT: MICHAEL SILL/EDUCATION ALTERNATIVES
LOCA'T'ION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1
EXISTING ZO ING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been u-1-witted
requesting a Rezoning of 14.41 LI (Light Industrial) < to a
Planned Development district and a Preliminary Plat for the Sill
Addition. This plat consists of four lots---three for
office/showroom use and one for a private school located between
Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 just west of the Silver Bell
Plaza. The Land Use Guide Plan designates this area Light
Industrial; therefore, an Amendment will be necessary.
BACKGROUND: There have been two previous preliminary approvals
for light industrial-type development on this site (1978 and
1980). One with three lots was final platted but never recorded
with the county. This proposal is similar, with both plans
having cul-de-sacs extending south from Silver Bell Road in the
center of the plat. In 1984, the Council again approved the
Preliminary Plat with one lot for the Road Machinery Company.
This plat was also never final platted. The site is currently
vacant and consists primarily of open grassland.
Lot 1 will contain the Tessaract Private School currently leasing
space in the Silver Bell Plaza. Their lease expires late this
summer. Education Alternatives (Tessaract School) was approved
to build their own freestanding facility in the Dallas
Development 2nd Addition just north of the Silver Bell Plaza.
Due to unforeseen circumstances, final development plans were not
consummated and the school had to find another location to
construct the building which needs to be operational by September
1988. In an effort to help expedite this process, the City
Council, at its April 5 meeting, approved Education Alternatives'
request for a building permit after the project receives its
Preliminary Plat.
Lot 1 (3.0 acres)
The 21,000 SF building has not changed from the previous plans.
It was designed to meet all office building parking, coverage,
and setback requirements in the event that the use would ever
change. Thirty-seven 9'-wide parking stalls are desired; Code
requires 106 for offices this size. Proof of parking
accommodates this requirement. Access will be provided by a one-
way west to east drop-off area. Stacking for twenty cars is also
possible in this area.
This facility is designed to accommodate three hundred children
at capacity. However, the intent is not to overcrowd, with a
maximum of twenty-two per class. The firs y ear will limit
enrollment to one hundred fifty students (seven three and four-
year-olds and eighty kindergarten through thire~ grade). The
second year will expand to kindergarten through sixth grade. The
school will be fully regulated by state educational agencies.
The staff will be certified and eventually consist of a full-time
administrator, a director, eleven teachers, eleven aides for
grades kindergarten through six, seven preschool teachers, and
specialty teachers on a limited basis.
The school is primarily for families with above-average income
and for children demonstrating above-average intelligence.
Individuality and the use of progressive learning techniques and
equipment will be stressed. The 170-185 day curriculum will be
reviewed by the state. Year-round school will be provided if
desired. The hours of operation will be 6:00 a.m. to 6;00 p.m.,
much the same as a day-care facility. Each student will have
parental drop-off and pickup. No bus service is provided.
The trash enclosure and rooftop fan units will be 4'ncorporated
into the stucco or masonry walls. Metal bands and the roof will
accent the main structure. Colors should be decided prior to
final approval so that the building aesthetically blends in with
the rest of the buildings in the Planned Development.
The proposed landscape plan is very well done. It demonstrates
the creativity of the school officials and the landscape
architect by creating play areas defined by landforms and plant
material, as well as providing the aesthetic "curb" appeal. No
revisions will be necessary for the final plat approval.
Lot 2 (3.37 acres)
Lot 3 (3.58 acres)
Lot 4 (2.55 acres)
The applicant wishes to designate these lots for
office/warehousing, wholesaling, and showroom use. No specific
breakdown has been proposed at this time and since it is a
Planned Development district, any building proposal should be
brought back through the typical public hearing process to ensure
a thorough review by the City.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed preliminary plat
consists of four lots with development at this time proposed for
Lot 1 only. The site and cul-de-sac street were rough graded
under a previous development proposal in 1978. The proposal for
the entire 14.4 acres (developed in 1978) shows the easterly
portion of this site sloping southeasterly towards Trunk Highway
No. 13 and the westerly portion of this site sloping to the
northwest towards the intersection of Old Cedar Avenue and Silver
Bell Road.
The development proposes to direct all site generated runoff from
Lot 1 onto the adjacent undeveloped lots. The development is
required to intercept all site generated storm water runoff by an
internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff by a storm
sewer to the existing City system. The City system is adequately
sued to accomodate the anticipated flows from the proposed Lot 1
development. The runoff from Lots 2, 3, and 4 is subject to
further review in subsequent platting phases.
Storm water from the proposed development is rout,3-a through the
existing City storm sewer system to the Minnesota .:.iver. Erosion
and sediment control measures need to be implemented to keep
sediment on site and reduce sediment transport to the Minnesota
River. A grading plan was provided for the proposed Lot 1
construction. Proposed lot grades for Lots 2, 3, and 4 were not
provided at this time and as a result a thorough review of the
Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan cannot be made. The following general
criteria for erosion control need to be addressed before a
grading permit is issued for Lot 1:
Storm water management, construction access routes and a
contact person needs to be identified on the Eresior, and
Sediment Control Plan who will be responsible for the
maintenance and implementation of the required erosion
control measures.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve the development is readily available from the
existing water main in the proposed cul-de-sac street.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is
readily available in the proposed cul-de-sac street to serve this
development.
Water and sewer service has been provided to proposed Lots 1 and
2. The development will be required to provide water and
sanitary sewer service to all proposed lots. Access to the
proposed development is readily available from Silver Bell Road.
The preliminary plat shows the proposed lots being served by a
cul-de-sac street taking access from Silver Bell Road. The
development on Lot 1 is proposing to take access from the
proposed cul-de-sac street and Silver Bell Road. The Silver Bell
Road access to proposed Lot 1 is required to intersect Silver
Bell Road at a right angle opposite the existing curb cut on the
north side of the street.
Due to the uncertainty of the development on proposed Lots 2, 3,
and 4, the development is proposing to construct the proposed
cul-de-sac street to a point just southerly of the westerly
entrance to proposed Lot 1. Since the development is not
proposing to construct the cul-de-sac street to its ultimate
design, the development will be responsible for the maintenance
on the proposed stub street.
The development is proposing a one way traffic maneuver for Lot
1. The entrance point to Lot 1 would be from the proposed
north/south cul-de-sac street with the exit onto Silver Bell
Road. The development has provided proof of parking for Lot 1
which identifies sufficient room to provide two way traffic
circulation through the site should the site develop as an office
type use versus the proposed school.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS. The existing sidewalk along the
south side of Silver Bell Road is not within the right-of-way
proposed to be dedicated by the applicant. This is in conflict
with City records because City records show an existing 50 foot
half right-of-way for Silver Bell Road in this area. City
records show that the existing 5 foot concrete sidewalk along the
south side of Silver Bell Road was constructed within the 50 foot
half right-of-way. The development is required to dedicate a 40
foot half right-of-way along the westerly side of the property
for Old Cedar Avenue. The development is providing sufficient
right-of-way for the proposed north/south cul-de-sac street.
The development will be required to provide the appropriate ;
utility easements for those public utilities constructed outside
of the dedicated right-of-way.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS; The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City
special assessment policies.
PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
274 Trailway $13.00/ff 893 $11,609.00
65 Lateral Benefit
Trunk Water Main 21.60/ff 953 20,585.00
Future Nicols Road 90.20/ff 667 60,163.00
66 Lateral Benefit
San. Sew. Trunk 15.85/ff 742 11,761.00
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $104,118.00
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
SILL ADDITION CONDITIONS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on Septembr 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be signed prior to the
final plat approval for a five-year period.
3. Lots 2, 3, and 4 shall be reviewed by the Advisory Planning
Commission and the City Council before any building permits
are issued.
4. All buildings shall be architecturally compatible and sce ial
emphasis will be placed on achieving a visually pleasing
image from Highway 13.
5. All signage shall be subject to the City's one-time sign fee
of $2.50 per square foot.
6. This development is required to provide an internal storm
sewer system to intercept site generated runoff and convey
the runoff by storm sewer to the existing City system.
7. Parking lot access from Lot 1 onto Silver Bell Road is
required to be at a right angle and opposite the existing
drive on the north side of Silver Bell Road
8. A 50' half right-of-way for Silver Bell Road and a 40' half
right-of-way for Old Cedar Avenue are required.
m
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessrent
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
S. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
-
~ a
_ eS
jf
00.. ~.tCr---_Rtl it
tx
1 Ll ~.}r
t V
d 1} , 'i 1
Korsunsky Krank Erick"n
Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue North
Suite SOO ~
Minneapolis, MN 55401
612/339-4200
963
s 88' 20345' E ^ S i L. V E B. E Lt✓ 2, c) ,b. C} ^
y-- y 5 89'55'48' E .x. _ ~
♦ pr-a y r.,tA K i PROS
h
2r:
yA\
i
4 x\sr,+ tc zaa,~3~- 1 83 ff*
Z'`$~ ~ L~ ~,1~ ~ x + ,.1 L..i hiAT ~,b taaoV'S~R\AL. FK.AN, ~wasc4ln
~ ~ ' Y~A ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1m1at= 1=aavo~~,ra
~1 e a ,
FOR:
Z 1 ° p , Z_a EDUCATION
4 -------1` } ---F~~. ALTERNATIVES INC.
0 a l _ a R~ 4°, - MINNEAQOtiS, MINN.
w
' L i Cl1Tit_1TV FA}C}-.t F.J~i'('S CTtP.i ( GS.r.X-l~'turu .w~..-a'ctia..YT tvC>.i?iG.
I .
PRELIMINARY
tt > ~ ~1T>v -TA PLAT
t17T i a-m .c-
~ ie `mot t_o-r z s . sT
y ' Z!! -C Janes R. Hill, inc.
~ ~ ' t G' PLANNERS l ENGINEERS lStA'?YEYO~
/ ri P
12 ;
1.,
<xi
Lyo
.na<. to x,~~.,o. t
14.
t a> 4 avse suw,vx Fnse.,
O~
04
215
xa t 84i.> test o stn a et 3/9 0) 9 ctfon d8,
e
1 4 Q of tnxrapxe30 pSPAN9POATAx1 `xW GNSpO) ATn)1.ATa1OOt 11-1
es
e aesa4)t ...WSact ion io 13en9 ®a t
t 9 oe y t.o Ri9n>eY x
Ko-m,ky Krnnk &,..k
Awhile-IA, inc.
acraiar N-th
.;ii,up, t.tn X401
SITE 'YN
- - - -
-s-- PROVi DED SILVER BEEF ROAD
4"", E> ~ FOR SIDEWALK Bf
;;^Exi$YMG ASPNAU " WAIX
PARKwC,
i ` 6ACK _ Pp P£RTY LINE -
60 20'-0' TYP
0- "W TYP t1NE WAY Ott CY f, - n f1 E* I/~iZ .,A r p LT
/ tLL21f 1~.1~ _
x' I IoNEY L 1,' SOP-OEE - A Rr
EACtJi, sOTA
I~
To'
" GATE . _ ) QAl FC}I 'rtF~
yy 4 ~ 13t~'it
i I P~ S01001- f. i f s K wE5 INC.
-F.) _ rnIr MINN.
I
W 00,
180 )l' ZJ5 ro -
SEI UACK
ZSnN11 ARIA Wl 1 It
L
r AvSRXi 1
J Piny AREA ~ %
MYL COATED CNMN LNA FENCE TYP. > OPERTY EINE
14
-ITF
1
4 15 30 50
P" C: DATA
130,678.13 SY, PART , . RI -W _TQ A,CK$
Dele R
2.99 ACRES
- •/RfN@_ SID[.,.:.,,,.,
Bt AREA 21,000 G.S.F. Wit„ APPROVE[) HY CITY -
LOT -P n ,E PR a
n :Y 20% i5t 27, ViSt1ORS10 37 CARS
16.0?` `TBACKS
20 E1
i 5 FL
o~I
,CI rcn t I „ RE 20 Fl,
I
H Slieei
P,
Korsunsky Kra- Es son
Architects, inc.
7 awvr ruvu
oa.* wr.e-,rorN 340 ir°' tr~nu, Worth
1'e, K, "im klN -,401
n rl. n.r, o i 2,
i+ <x.os~.Y a-K.... a=o.e.caMY
toe, II
sIT( acno~ c. ..HFc,.~*rsr
SI ER SEES AD
_ m' ~ sr 4 (TJ~I l4vM+ t ~TM-rt 4`PN 1..~
1 m~ ~ Sat ^y n a PROPER T-
o~ ~
ihsamff
It 3 p}x5}'+I(PN !"inti:A) EAGAN, MiNNESOTn
f URB f UT 1 it'
C COCO71CO C"J9NiXXy
wirer' rlTt a++t I r _ rAxRl 3 R:
Maernn~abr.act ALTERNATIVES ION
- 3 Nuf wvrc I f rv..~ uuCf.» MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
PROPOSED SCHOOL i 7 f 'rocn~.
t Carn*+tb .,w~u"C. j l I j (21,000 S.F.) OR
fx~.
R, f ~w r c.
2 rncs.k.r,f u~ I ~ J ~ I a1a4+~dar~ n'""A""' ~ .
2h' sernnt II 31 ~s , TZ ' I
t tz txo cawu iwue -
I- - t n r m r~rnuv caraoo
- - L
t4l M tptn~lrW P)89>`.I JN.eE Y - - tm w trt 4' a.G.
PROVrR 114--¢Nnhm.;as
(a Fi,it.R Fi fr6 ~TRMKCCwNET- +-'f ibWS ElJIrG
_ _ ~ _ 4 worn < r, tkPlfRSf{€R C 30' o,e, *1- .
p~ rwet.P nvrr ttwr+x-r+.~
G >.r u.+cw NORTH
SITE
F t- ANT Se, HEDV L.a PLAN
ma tt.. d.~.
11ti,{(►+MI -E 4•ww sr f~~r~• NihMIMs. f .ItF "IT 4 15 34 64 -W c..amr
•n
r.POn w„ ap.,~ M m.. « anew ,ry a~
tr a wpaz.kxn, u+a mew ~ m . axp npim®rvq Mer
r --5z
s wa.r m. uw.am. s~.w
!t MMf- - ~.t. G- ua a ~ 9 ~YMRi
n - - -
D as K IT' -I_
°
V-16 9T -IT.
i
rvp+e.ywrv. f
.EF>( ww«n'Yai%wn u lM k w+is m we „+weww
w..+so r+.,..r. Pr~eq Na 879-OQS-21 Strew
RrR wr ~ M.nsr+u~n~n+n.r
'AW M+e1(r5ti'"11 - MLYOb'~~.•^c1L wy1a ~ ~ w~
Cwt ~m.w.w ~w Date 0-1588
I ~ --ww.+. wpm •La+a> 8y 5
( ~ ClrerAced al FV' of
Korsnnsky Krank Ey
. m....-tests, In
6 /339-
CUT I _ =I-PA CUT 'U- CUT Ti
N£MOYE E 9
RUN YE EXISTING SIII tl( II UTMCTER A 4 T
CUR n -TIER PROPOSED Sip£W AS.K EASEMENT COREi_ YAIt fTER
at
ANC -01 WT SILVER [JEI1 ROAD ~ -
CUR IE BETE YAILEY_ (
tP i ta. LK I~
O (ET
-z
REMOVE SlDEWAL _ -
S' TRANSIT i
I I" V~`ti J.vi w nih \ -I98' ( 7• Ra , aY i1~ L~.R cT
l\
IY_ ~ EA(.AN, MANIQS(}ii
4. t
jJ(J v
TRANSITION SIM-LK
I
w
FOR:
Lv..
EDUCATION
3 PRC)F(xr: r sGiocx ( AITERNAI IVES INC.
COURSE AGGREG i T (21,000 S.F_) MWNEAPQUS, MINN,
' STREET RUNOFF I dr GROU
SEDIMENT TRAP
R FINISH FLOOR Et" ~c
r,~ I
}
PAVED PLAY AREA
`
'ti_~'ft{ ✓~0
m °RADI9tl ~p
C,
zyaJ E
0 15 34 60 GUTTER
CURB OPENING AT GATE
SECTI
•s NOCe Date
o- a<,
9 L
SECTION C-C
e... u.',..-SEC JN - ~
s
SECTION D-D
e< . xawl~rs. : ss tz Gunn s u~xrsu
C4tfCp@7E VALLEY GUTTER 03-7= .N°•~''-re- -
CUE J 7,
A
Km -,jn®ky Krank Erickson
Archi=_=ete, Inc.
Avenue North
- ale -I,:r i,t,nn..,,.i,, tl., =fN 55401
- 11213;;'1 42130
i ICURi CUT _ -Ili tUT 'tURi CC-~T) 1110 CUT,
PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT S tt SESiid>!+
S11111LUMAD
° r[S)Yt[tY (IMP
i 2W-0• TYP
RELOCAT[ NYA
~A,r ,TR r TESSEI~T ANNAMMA-s
r 60
tME[ -I If [YI B-9 ONE WAY ONtY
r r
s
MWf50TA
Iii SSA it FOR;
All-111 s EDUCATION
ALTERNATIVES INC.
a-raue MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
(21,400 S.PJ 1 i
V,tRAIN(; iT ~(xi~ I ~ i I ~T it f~f
SIiNAft (i t rye;.
FIN118H FLOOR
r ~1 ~ QLYV 9000
_
A -i tiS %rtr{ nus
d , l)O'_{~O1Ptpnr-vi'd<ireA) i I< _
' Iva ProT A) i >o sexo
INn 1+nIN ~
co no c
[ a Ii K f1 NCt l 9 ~ '
2 >
PRELII
-
4'7- ! 1lOP111Y IINI UTILITY !
Y ? ~ S_IS-Fb
7 NORTH =~a
0 .e o. w
s 15 30 60 UTILITIES LEGEND
::::Ti 0IANITART89WIR LEGEND % P. D
-i--- [si®TIMA I"— ®[wtW tx isTNIN a{-i1 cUSil s Ive-1 9 YkwXK
RROROI[D IA0NNAAY i1w1A __-src- .era.- rROrosen ss-11 Cvra s Cv'rxea
PROYOI[D wkitR MAIN PtAeoseo ai-i& cVFV s 6(YTTCx ~ ~ _
Propct MD. S70t3O2S-01 9Md
DNy 216$5
@.wn ar •j'
CP~kM W ad
Arch,;=pct
ie North
x...131!., ~ ,
5 01
t t ~ t Ilt:; -9
SATE 5ECTfON
asea PROV
70R Ai% O SILVER I ROAD
r
omm m G4B - -
npW _N'4 t~r F i t+;
~_Msl As,
:i. ii~:._-
12 6 ( i YPI or+E wnY OWE 1- f f ~ f J I I' E SSERAcT
Ro O TI3 _ l "mil!
~ ~_6 r I I Y ~ ~ M ~ ' tn~.w+ hvwt5<)iA
GATE FOR:
a
- - T / - EDUCATION
14 2 PROPOSED OFFICE P
ALTERNATIVES !NC
I (21,000 S.F.) MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
SMACK
FIN. FLR. EL 800.00•
zip'. ' . - _ ! p
i
' ~ W#Yt COATED CtN ° _.as- s 541.11' ~ - PROQ£RTY FIN$ } °
r~
+C%
gP 0"": F
NORTH y fg
'
J
0 15 30 60 ve. m. wm a p» see a
o.w fEN2,
PROJECT DATA
E AREA 130,618.13 ST, _G s ~ TBACKS
149 ACRES n. D 112 SPACI 3. ra a» r 9
~JING AREA 21,oo0 G.S.F. PACES
LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED 11 - SPAC! s
AILOWID: 20%
A JAL 16,0; ! SETBACKS
tT >MNG I I ,S f ilul
m-,~..Re
R ' p,. ; F P! ZONING PD 0 FRICT) or w
o
1N\ LT.ISNC ) NI: :NIDNI GNV DNINNHId ~ A1ddns n Alf ~ 3VN Cb'Oa W w
DUl ' - Nd~d z NIGVHD
11.H 'NSat l1L[ • ~YOC iO A110
NOI nnv 111., 'N -HU)ILN
x
i
0
k ~
s
u F
y
Y W ~i O
s rs u0
7
E 1 u C
p W 3 7
L W 1 a K C
n ~ a K
~`y N 2
_ a 't', b n U ~ O
I Il (y ~ ~ t - ~ d Q .
%N r - x
\f a o a x
II ICI A ~~V A h x o
QQ ~ ~
f
I I l t I _ ~ '
I I ~ I l IV / tA~\i
IIII ~~u `c I~\e\ \ I t~ p z,4 ~
L ~ \
t
-wy
rf
w
~y 1 III lI aN ( s
Ili i ~ ~ ~ n~ I ~ I ~ ~
Tl, I
3AV ~dQ3~
-)9v ON AGMH9IN iNnai
a
- -i AIL - 893 .F
STREET IMPROVEMENTS IC I_ - 7 F.F. Kornunmkt Kc®nk Erickson
Archlfi inc.
300 Fir,1 A-- Noah
{ S .
M~1t° N 15901
612!3; v-3 iH)
113
5 88' 10' 15' E J S L. V (3 E L-L- 933
r
51!9 3~'.'~° E - ~ , wue
ro~ - o C1 A, Q s
f ~._-T l2oRnE^ urxx " i
~N-77', o..
{ ortr• ~
\AA > . I
1 . .
I
j ti I I , ~ r.3-E..~
TEssERAcT'
l I I I t was o a+scxs-rczaAl fx; , waa
1 C-A f { ~ ~z3zs~B.s,NC.,-P c3
\ { { L1sc r nor o~c is
FOR
1 \ of - L. ~..<..a,.c e VES INC.
t \ ~ I I zc,:,, c.
\ \ I I 1rr Z i Owe.sC..$~
a1
4 l e rr g L-
, t ~ ao J 3 a0 mac. '
-RS SLWEYORS
1 s It .{tp ~ao~c ausscc.-e- -
_ F
~a # !mx
9 at tM seat 1 oS Ba ; tk
rf Bnx o B
htP'c e;-0tDD33gi y.p
k1fr88
Illannumlilailil~Iiil~ SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LATERAL BENEFIT ~ 742 F.F.
WATER LATERAL TRUNK BENEFIT -c 953 F.F.
oreunsky Krank grief a
Archilecla, Inc,
300 First A,,nur North
( Suitr 500
i ` Minnrapiis, MN 55401
6121339-8200
?t f+I
I
- -
- -
I
-
5 l ( r xraTlrac zo*>!c-
TESSERAcT'
t 1 i I --i ut,no'rE.Ca ssst.l-rc_tAL, 1--. soya
~ ,,r~ 'C p B I I ~ -
l I y I Ua>=. c>aovo~~,cs
11 ~1 , D .rre., acuno~. FOR:
EDUCATION
0 = k Q I ® --------------L _ - - ® ..a._~-a, ALTERNATIVES INC.
} r i tMlNNfAl'OtiS, MINN.
I I 'Z-° I c~w~s~
11 > i i U I caacwac_B, a aa~
( uwc+++aBCw,at sue.
a~.>> w.,X..,w+awAY to
t ~ ~ \L/ s/ s..vaG.c,B..vu v ,g d ~
PRELi M RY
i I s' 11 p®-T a PLAT
I
L„ `tee r lcrr 9 s. : 3•
Ac.
i JOi./ IeIIP /9 d4..
R.ANNERS / ENGINEERS f SURvEyM
➢ o°n 1 ~ fr pG sbs.r.aA o, sea. ~r.a . dea-
C I r 'es ~
a aao.,.a s...g
/ [sue R\p Aea-+e. mua~.c.T -ro a»
!
N e
2.5"
3B-t e
~dgFi°c ~ if iy~ng a
~u~ a~a~3ozisrr
, , a.~go a a
7Z5 7Z
r
~1.0
4 kf
5 3y-- C. I 1
'
-r -i
:
cit%i of
! PUBLk- WATER
`'ARKS MASTER PLAN
m
D E PA P T
Control Commission
° ` Seneca Plant
2
r
lig
v «`5t i/. C.C.
JJJ ~ ,r
A
f
:
b x
f
11 1
ur s i
Interceptor - 15°`
~ i► . ~,r~~w0~'E1V
F~ IG 4#* 2
1 SANITARY SEWER approved. plate
city of eagan standard
PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT