Loading...
05/05/1988 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MEMORANDUM O: ADVISORY PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN V , DIRECTOR O PARKS AND RECREATION DATE. MAY 3, 1988 E: MAY S, 198COMMISSION MEETING The first of the Commission's pre-commission meeting tours is scheduled for Thursday evening beginning at 6:30 P.M. We will leave the municipal center at 6:30, o to Blue Cross/Blue Shield followed by Carnelian and Northview Parks. It is anticipated we will return to the municipal center just prior to a 7.30 start of the regular agenda for the Commission. After approval of the minutes of the April meeting, and the agenda, it would be appropriate for the Commission to review the Consent Agenda items and development proposals. Under new business, the first item is the proposed development of Winkler Park. A separate packet item is contained concerning this particular item for your review. It appears that the neighborhood is in agreement with the park design and layout other than that for an open skating area for winter use. i'bzi> item has had some discussion i the neighborhood recently and appears that residents of the neighborhood will be present to present their views. The first item under new business pertains to Northview Park and the irrigation of the three new softball fields. Again, Staff hll:_, prepared a separate memorandum covering this particular item and will provide additional information at the Commission meeting on Thursday evening. Item under new business is a request from a resident to operate a "traveling concessions" in Eagan parks this summer. A memorandum has been prepared outlining this request. Staff has also received additional information from other communities pertaining to the operation of vending carts in other communities' parks systems. The third and final item under new business is the winter program report. Dorothy Peterson, Recreation Supervisor has althored this report and it is presented for your review. Dorothy will be making a few brief comments concerning the report and sharing with you some staff concerns as well as problem resolutions from this year. PARKS DEVELOPMENT Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan will bring thr Commission up to date on two of the more t~ _zfica-r~~- cont~ in 1987 and will provide you with background or. r.i-t proposed shelter building at Thomas Lake Park. idd openin,4 w,-,s originally scheduled for May 2, 1988 but has now b,--c--n extendcd to May 9, 1988. Not available for submission with this packet is information pertaining to Ohmann Park. Although the Advisory Commission has previously approved the design for the park, Staff had hoped to provide the Commission with cost estimates for the first phase development. Because of the work load of the department, we are unable to do so at this time. We would like to raise, as an issue for discussion, feasibility of irrigating the soccer fields within the park, a portion of which would be provided for in the construction contract. Under the Community Center project, Staff will bring the Advisory Commission up to date on the architectural selection process an- program writing that has been continuing since the la-a Commission meeting. There are four items under other busir nd ~ts. An attachment has been provided showing the bond i- nd p __utout of March 31, 1988. Included with your packet is the consult report on the Art Park Concept. Staff has not prepared a rrF~-rr~ or summary and is providing it without comment at this ti-Me. Dorothy Peterson will update the Commission on the Eagan Athletic Association and Rosemount Area Athletic Association's Facilities Committee and ongoing talks to merge, or work cooperatively, in providing youth activities. Finally, the last remaining item is Department Happenings at the back of this packet. AGENDA ADVISORY RECREATION O ISISO MINNESOTA EAGAN, Thursday, a , 198 6:30 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center :30 P.M. Tour of Blue Cross] le Shield, C---, l.L r: orie Parks B. 7:00 . Regular Meeting - Eagan Municipal Center C. Call to Order an Pledge of Allegiance D. Approval o - - - a E. Approval of mutes o the Regular Meeting o April 7, " F. Tree City .S. . Award eve G. Consent Agenda: (1) Potts Addition - en Potts (2) Ridge avers a °.ition - Haven prises (3) Eagandale * Lake 3rd dait:..on - Opus Corporation/$to_ *_h ern Mutual rife (4) Sill Addition - Michael Sill Education Alternatives, Inc. Development Proposals: Alden on Addition - Rosewood Corporation (2) Unisys Par Addition - Unisys Corp./City if igan I. old Business: (1) Winkler Jackson J. New Business: (1) othview a Irrigation - ark Development ( Traveling Concessions - Request inter Program Report (4) Trust Fun K. Parks Development: (1) Tennis Court Contract - 87-2 (2) ark Building Contract - 7-13 Thomas La Par Building Contract - 8-18 (4) Ohmann Par - Status Report L. Community Center Project: (1) Architect Selection date (2) Program Writing (3) Philosophical Foundation for Fees and C.arcp:. other Business and Re]-- : (1) on Fun - 13 j (2) r Par i . - Consultant's Report (3) Update o ERA/,L au., Facilities committee (4) Department a wis Adjournment Subs ,c, o app 2yal MINUTES O_ UI : TI OF THE ADVISORY PAR rO a ION , MINNESOTA APRIL , 1988 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks anc Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. on Thur. d'a pt it++_ 7, 1988 with the following commission Members Carroll, Michele Swanson, Wayne Sames,Sandy l r~~„,3 George Kubik and JoAnne Alt. Staff present incl,ded rectcl t Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa; Landscape Architect/P~-_-r~-" Planner, Steve Sullivan; Parks Superintendent, John VonDeLin(J:-; Recreation Supervisor, Dorothy Peterson and Parks Secretary, Cherryl Mesko. Commission Member not present was David .Hennes. AGENDA A motion was made by Porter, seconded by Sames with all co?erabers voting in favor to accept the agenda as presented. MINUTES MARCH , 1988 MEETING With the deletion o Wayne Sames attending the March I meeting, Sandy Masin moved, JoAnn Alt seconded, with all .;.>r. voting in favor to accept th-'~ March minutes as z m }nded. MINUTES FOR -6, "ING Bob Porter moved, Wayne Sames seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes of the March 26, 1988 special meeting as presented. CONSENT AGENDA The following consent agenda items T. r :ed for approval. On a motion by Dick Carroll, secur, _ r? 3_ q r_ubik, with all members voting in favor, the Commissi_n approved recommendation to the City Council of the following items: 1. COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. . CRYSTAL PONDS - That this plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. 3. EAGANDALE CENTER - 20TH ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement consistent with commercial/ industrial property and a trail be placed along Lexington Avenue. Advisory Parks and Recreation Coir-i_ i n Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting Page 2 4. DAN BAR COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - That wh 5 permit be subject to a cash dedication ~c~yzi~mt -t consistent with the City's commercial an 11dusur:' 1 policy. 5. OLSON ADDITION That this plat be subject to a h dedication requirement for the newly created lot 1 that an 8 foot bituminous trailway be placed along R< Z Road. 6. HOSFORD ADDITION ° That this plat be subject t dedication requirement and a 5 foot concrete" be placed along Deerwood Drive. 7. WHISPERING OAKS - 4TH ADDITION - That this plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. O IE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan outlined for some background information relative to the middle "'ol He reminded the Commission that they had previously ie4 e t"- High School/Middle School site, although they only made -i recommendation regarding the High School portion of the athletic fields. The proposed plan shows the addition of 3 baseball fields with soccer field overlays, a free standing baseball and a football/track facility which lie directly soutl; of the Northview Athletic Complex. The original utility plan direct storm water outlets at the south edge of Northview Park. Mr. Sullivan asked Tom Wilson from School District 196 if he could elaborate on the updated information relative to this utility plan since Staff had some concerns regarding the potential for erosion caused by the water draining o the site. Tom WilArln indicated that the school district has been working very closely with City Staff and would re-route the piping to the sati~.vi:n of the engineering department. Dick Carroll questioned if the re-routing would cross over the existing tree farm close to Northview Athletic and Director Vraa explained that the tree farm will be removed for the proposed tennis courts adjacent to Northview Park. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting Page 3 Tom Wilson explained that School DiE`--riot 196 , ourr :1Ur .a u a„ meeting with Dakota County regarding th punt of would allow on Diffley Road. Currently w.. are the present time the County does not want to consider anot'-Cs, the School District will continue working with th .o try to accommodate the entrance/exit flow for the buses. Tom Wilson further explained that they are thinking of having an access to the school property from iline Drive which will bring emergency vehicles along the left side of the property to the center of the complex. Member Carroll asked if it was known what percc-.-O --a-1r, -the grade dropped from the oval track to the first ball 'i nd. Steve Sullivan indicated he wasn't sure at this time but could find out. Bob Porter moved, Sandy Masin seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the platting as presented regarding the athletic fields and facilities and allow the water ,.-Jr.-off to be negotiated between the School District and the City. BRIDLE RIDGE - 2 ADDITION Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan introduced the Commission to Rick Packard from Sienna Corporation who then elaborated on the proposals requested for Bridle Rid 7e 2nd Addition. Mr. Packard reviewed some background info.._,aa=-ion stating that this 2nd Addition would incli-de a 251 lot subdivision that would be devel-L : it - y stages. The current proposal includes 49.47 loc_X: k the original Eagan Hills Farm PD, the 25.95 acre 'all pr+p.,.gty and 91.57 acres located west of Bald Lake. The 91.57 acre parcel had not been reviewed previously by the Commission and has not, as yet, fulfilled its parkland dedication. Mr. Packard stated that as a result of the curr.,,,,t the would dedicate Park #3 to fulfill the remain_ig par=land dedication requirements for the Eagan Hills PD and r also wish to convey and receive parkland credit for a 2.2 greenway from Bald Lake to orhview Road. This greenway is --ithin the PD limits but was not included initially a parkland. Finally, Sienna wants to dedicate 6.85 acres within Parcel A which includes Bald Lake and its southern shoreline. Mr. Packard's comment regarding the proposed c:_ trail link was that he felt it would better be posit-.oi_ _n the existing parkland area that had been dedicated. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting Page 4 Member Carroll expressed his concern in putting the trail on the west side of the property because of the steep incline. Parks Planner Sullivan explained that if the trail is placed on the west side of the property the plat can be revised to accommodate a wider trail link and the steep slopes on the west side as well. Mr. Sullivan also stated he felt the continuous trail on the north side of the property would be L,r^_>Lit. Issue #2 was addres,:>< d by Steve Sullivan r parkland dedication of .65 -:.,ores of shoreline south o- E~? tl T,70 _e (approximately 250 lin. feet) and 6.25 acres on ponaing area (Bald Lake). Steve stated that the Commission is basically dealing with shoreline since the Comprehensive Park System Flan does not acknowledge Bald Lake for recreational intent. :Til Porter stated his preference would be to have the d- _ a utility easement over the lake donated with no v parkland. Wayne Sames asked if, in the event the l donated are the lot lines extended to the center of the 1 + then a drainage utility easement placed over the water; to '_r2 Steve Sullivan answered yes. Issue #3 concerns Park 3 in which the greenway provide.; a continuous trail link in conjunction with the Eagan Hills Fauin PD. During the Eagan Hills Farm PD review th_ C~7TY~~E_~>~_~~ required that all ponding areas within greenwa-- water level, allow pedestrian passage. Steve Sul' that the plat be reviewed and revised to provide fc rcc_ c? i x corridors above the high water levels within this park. Issue 4 reflects the developers request for transfer of parkland from Parcel A to the 25.95 "Hall" property. Although the Hall property has fulfilled its parkland dedication as part of the Eagan Hills Farms PD, Sienna Corpora'-.ion is r westing partial transfer of parkland dedication regvir nts to ,_el A. As the phases are platted, the parkland fee_ 11 be - __t the then current rate. Wayne Sames questioned if there was any precedent for this situation to which Director Vraa responded negatively. JoAnn Alt questioned the difference in time for developing this parcel if the Commission allows the transfer. Rick Packard responded that it could take 2 - years. Mr. Packard continued by stating that Sienna does not currentlt own the Hall property but the first phases to be developed are .,'I and east with the Hall property being developed last once iz acquired. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting Page 5 With most of the background information provided and questions answered, Chairman Carroll brought each issue before the Commission individually and the following actions wer,- taken: 1. Sandy Masin moved, Dick Carroll seconde+' v ill members voting in favor to grant the dev_14_ I partial park dedication credit for the greenwa Northview Park Road and Bald Lake as follows: a. onding area and lake - no credit . 25% credit based on all land above the high water level of the pond. C. 100% credit for all land with less than 12% slopes. 2. Dick Carroll moved, George Kubik seconded with a]'J members voting in favor to accept an 8 foot bituminous trail link as recorded in staff recommendation. 3. Sandy Masin moved, George Kubik seconded all members voting in favor that the revision of tic plat to provide additional width abc the high 1 for a trail connection within Id Lake/N( s c? greenway be resolved by a joint ing bey y, F t and developer. . Sames moved, Alt seconded with all members voting in favor to use the 25% figure for partial park dedication for the .65 acres of shoreline abutting Bale Lake. 5. Carroll moved, Sames seconded with all voting in favor to accept a cash park dedication tribution on the remaining lots. . Kubik moved, Masin seconded with all members voting in favor that there be a joint review by developer and staff to see if a continuous trail link can go through Park 3 above the high water level of the pond and if not, the trail may need to move. Chairman Carroll commented on his apprehension ing the legal documentation necessary for the park dedicatii transfer from Parcel A to the Hall property. His concern way that this should not be an open ended agreement. Director Vraa stated that Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of rill, 1988 Meeting Page 5 this document would be drawn up when the develop = I,-. r_, i the owner of the Hall property, as wel' as sub that parcel, would be bound to the r - nt "tea " 11 1 i a dedication. Rick Packard continued _---tine t ~~a agreement could be amended to delete t Hall property agreement. Ken Vraa asked if the property would be shown as described to which Mr. Packard responded yes; it will not be shown as a lot or an outlot but with a separate legal description. Member Kubik requested that staff look i3 aspects of a transfer of this type. Bob Porters rn about starting a trend and opening up the optic®a - _.r __±=r in this fashion to developers in general. 7. With all discussion finished, George Kubik moved, Way--,2! Sames seconded with all members voting in favor approve the transfer subject to the stipulation 45:.];v this was based on an individual request along City's past association with the "Leveloper not be viewed a setting a st-- -°-d ~ r u transfers and that this transfe conforming with all legal requireaznts. 8. Wayne Sames moved, Dick Carroll seconded with all members voting i favor to have the developer provide a cash contribution for park dedication. George Kubik noted for the record that the r i of credit allowed for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition 1- Ot Set. a precedent and is based on this individual situatici n :_viewed as such. STAFFORD OAKS Parks Planner Sullivan reviewed the proposal for Stafford Oaks Addition to rezone 1.9 acres of R°-2 within Thomas Lake Heights Addition to a planned devel pment district and an amendment to the Eagan 40 P for 328 4al rn4t-. Mr. Sullivan explained that the current proposer yurcr_ i 1.9 acres in addition to the 32.1 acres that they are cure tly developing. The parkland dedication obligation for the 32.1 acre parcel is pending and the purchased 1.9 acres has previously fulfilled its parkland dedication requirement as part of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. The developer is requesting credit for the proposed recreation facilities they are planning for their 328 rental units. ADvisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7,1988 Page 7 Member Sames asked if there had been a other developers regarding this issue. Mr. in January, 1987 the issue was raised with Addition. Sandy Masin indicated that historic did not issue credit for recreation facility ' further explained that we have required play be supplied in some cases and the rationale e_ some complexes only provided what they absolut azi: a credit was used as a incentive to get more ni' uilt '=mot a development like this. Sandy Masin stated that if a credit is given there should some way the maintenance can be monitored to insure the equip is kept in good working order rather than allow it to b,, rui down. Wayne Sames thought there should be consistent for quality and maintenance. Member Masin asked if the use of a credit to building the recreation facil`ito P City's standards and specifications. Bob Porter indicated his desire to see the develor-r's layout of what they are proposing i they are asking a credit. Wayne Sames questioned the legal ramifications of changing the policy based on individual requests. Chairman Carroll questioned if it would be bet_Er credit based on a dollar amount or a percentage Porter suggested giving one dollar amount and have il i 1n - the entire area. The Commission discussed different opti.is in setting the credit but did not want to have this useu as a precedent for future developments. Dick Carroll moved, based on the amenities reflected in the packet documentation, to give $6,000 towards all the developer proposes to install and encourage developer strong maintenance and upkeep standards. Bob Porten motion and all members voted in favor. Dick Carroll noted for the record that the Commission's action was a one time decision based o specific development needs of this specific situation. George Kubik moved, Bob Porter seconded wi:h al' voting in favor to give the developer credit for 1.° .cr,: r1 .24 units) towards the park dedication responsiilit' . JoAnn Alt moved, Michele Swanson seconded with al" _.s voting in favor that the developer provide a trail alony iias Lake Road and County Road 30 and a cash dedication. Advisory Parks an F ion r -or, mutes of April 7, Meetii., Page 8 RAHN PARK Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works pr-xiod the. Commission with the background information relative to the Rahn Park Trunk Storm Sewer Improvement project. Since issue has been before the Commission in the r. Cc'_' it was important to bring them u to date on ',.hat has tz,; d and the reasons this issue is again in front of the Commis ic.. During the construction of Cedar Cliff 2nd there were growing water levels i the ondin area (Pond AP-50) thlt did not have an outlet. The two existing office buildings x,but the west side of Pond AP-50 are subject to flooding due to rising water levels in the pond. In January, 1986 a feasibility report v- )r,~:pared looking at various alternatives. One alternative loc. 1 at running an outlet north from the pond through the low part of Rahn Park and opposite Rahn school to carry the water. A second alternative which was previously preferred, suggested that with the development of Cliff LaT'J-, "alle:: the possibility existed to run the line through a p - m`n the property directly east of AP-50, which is _ ral Land, and follow through across Rahn to Cliff Li__ The rezoning of this particular piece of property was d+n°_ed thus the City was leery to proceed with this alternative. A third alternative would require an easement from the property owner east of P-50 to run a line parallel rith Cliff Road and north on the west side of Rahn Road, crol-,,, _r/-'ad to the east side of Rahn. At the hearing, the t1he sand did not want to grant the easement and refuses, to ally Ta the draining to occur across his property. Because of the significant cost to consider running the line parallel to Cliff east and parallel to Rahn north until it could tie in with Pond P-25 it was felt the best alternative at the present time both in time and money would be the first alternative in which the outlet to Pond AP-50 will be constructed through Rahn Park into Pond AP-49. Mark Hanson from onestroo osene Anderlik Associate present to further clarify the concerns and questions he Commission had relative to wanting to implement the thrid alternative which would run the trunk storm sewer thr(-" the Rahn Park area from Pond P-50 to Pond AP-49. AP-49 is tle .end in Rahn Park property and south of AP-49 is AP-50 which s the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting Page 9 flooding area that affected the Cedar Cliff 2nd Addl,_tiO",. r;,d AP-26 collects run-off from 56 acres and then runs I c Pond AP-25 will collect all the run-off from thy: :.f Galleria site. There is some sensitivity to Pond AP-2 near R<'_n Elementary school since the elevation is 883.5 and the corner of the adjacent ballfield is 885, however there is only a 1.5 foot bounce in the pond. In pursuing the course of running the line through the I Park area from Pond AP-50 to Pond AP-49, whic] would air: I 15" pipe from area to area, there would be a ~0 of the oak trees in the park area. If the line was run east on Clif kr_o ,1 and north on jRahn along the proposed realignment the cost would be signifim-rit'y more. For example, the difference in running the li-e Y.r>> Rahn Park versus parallel to Cliff Road and Rahn, wcrA1"~" $701000. Another consideration the Ci'_-,r has is t' in along Cliff and Rahn some of the cuts Es muc°r 0 " cuts on the Federal Land property acts .,,roximut y 2 f, the park area would require very little cutting. Member George Kubik expressed his concern that the Commission was again being asked to give up park area to meet needs of others. Wayne Sames asked Director Vraa if there ivu~> a plan to do trails through the woods at Rahn Park. Director Vra indicated the process was more preservation at this poi-_ Ind that there were no plans at this time to develop trails location. Landscape Architect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan ad _ the ponding water in the park as it relates to the loss of t: He indicated there was not a significant impact on the exit3uing ponds noting that one had a 1-3 foot bounce which is a natural bounce and the other had a 1-6 foot bounce which will gcv into the poplar succession first and then move into t-, W ds. The area surrounding Pond AP-49 will need to 10 J determine the impact on the trees after the hiyl is shown. The department will have to review tl-c- i it presents itself. As part of the trunk storm sewer project the affected trees can be selectively eliminated. Steve Sullivan stated that Pond AP-26 has fl oo~ ballfield in Rahn Park but a dike with a flap gate was which seems to have helped the situation to dew :v~ possibility exists that a 27" extension E,. to ~T", bring the water from AP-26 to AP-49 ancl t._ai6 =_,ould 10c ,r;later date. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7,1988 Meeting Page 10 Member Dick Carroll indicated that some times it's better to do what is good for the City versus what is good for an individual department. He questioned if Mr. C~11,,( rt would recommend adding a 27" line from AP-26 to .nTI-49 t °hi 'n time. Ken Vraa stated it was L l ard to tell i at this time, however, it cc:c a ]c.E =)e an i n t a te. Mr. Colbert stated that the co:--,t to the }ark Department would be $30,000 to run this 27" extension. George Kubik commented that it appears as though vl),,= are substituting park maps for pond maps. He asked Mr. O-Jlrcl-, t-t if they would consider replacing some of the trees that <<;- a destroyed/remove during the construction of t', +-rt~r;, sewer line. Mr. Kubik suggested a small miti r replacement if the Commission decides to move t ~r?,> proposal. Mr. Colbert stated that he felt the departi, z-~ r-_ts could work closely in insuring that the area would be resto9-od as much as possible and would make a concentrated effort to insure that occurred. Mr. Colbert was questioned as to the trerr-;h Width. for the piping. He stated the rule of thumb i- `aa twice as wide as it is deep, i.e. if the pipe t 15 feet deep the trench width would be 3 feet. Dick Carroll moved, based on the significant financial impact, to accept the proposal for trunk storm sewer improvement Project No. 452 as outlined on Page 45 of the Commission's packet and recommend that the 27" line from Cedar Cliff Addition n+_v be done at this time with a mitigation program for hardwood -rr , construction restoration and enhancements surrounding th^ p- i, area. The motion was seconded by Wayne Sames with al voting in favor. George Kuic noted for the record that this action is not to be viewed as setting a precedent and the decision is based solely o this individual situation and was reviewed as such. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting Page 11 CENTER TOWN 100 - SIXTH ADDITION Steve Sullivan reminded the Commission they had n r,-v cci_a Lly reviewed this parcel at the time of the Eagan Heights - I'Cial Parks P.D. The parks dedication has bf?nn fulfil-1 The trails/sidewalks previously recommend(-,d .e ider_` I and theCommission would need to determine if Lhe recomm~.., ~ trail location should be revised as a result of the Chang in land use proposed. George Kubik stated the change asminor and 'feels °"?'-r_, trail: should remain as originally planned. Michele &v,,anson the number of curb cuts on Town CenterDrive and ex ~.e,, preference for a trail along Denmark fo:, 'ty and traff_, reasons. After much discussion, Wayne Sames moved, JoAnn Alt seconded with all members voting in favor to keep the proposed trail alignment o Town Center Drive and add a trail segment to tie into Denmark. BLUEBIRD OS Mr. George Tre ,n _ . )re ..o re qu pe----- _ i n from the Commission to pl c, 1 l <:bi_, hot::.: n th --tcott Station Park. Mr. Trayno-_ explaine_a that he Duld cc,t uct the houses and maintain them himself. I is his intention to monitor the bluebird population in Eagan and help preserve this -®ecies. Commission members commended Mr. Traynor for his s and thanked him for following through on his idea. George Kubik moved, Dick Carrol secorl ith al'. voting in favor to approve the ins allati-, if the ::1 houses at Westcott Station Park based on a on+_ year trial - rJod. ARBOR DAY RESOLUTION Director Vraa introduced the Arbor Day Resolution to the Commission and asked John VonDeLlnde to elaborate on -y(-,-,f.'s events as well as the events being planned for this year. Mr. VonDeLinde stated that last year was very successful and there were twice as many people attending as they had originally projected. This year's Arbor Day celebration will take place on April 23 and he invited the Commission Members to at'enil and join in the tree planting celebration. The Arbor Day r ' 'r~tion on the 23rd will be followed by the second annual try-- -1 _in April 30th at the Public Works Building. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting Page 12 Sandy Masin moved, JoAnn Alt seconded with all voting in favor to adopt the Arbor Day Resolution as pry SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 COMMU IE EDUCATION L17%'[SIO ' Director Vraa asked to have a volunteer from the Commission to serve on the Community Education Advisory Committee. He stated that Sandy ertz had served on this committee in the Rust and that Sandy Masin had served on a similar committee for District. 191. Michele Swanson expressed an interest on the committee. Dick Carroll moved, Wayne Sames rir,_- all members voting in favor to nominate Michele Swar'e~(1r= ~re on the Community Education Advisory Comission for Scholl riot 196. WINKLER JACKSON Steve Sullivan reviewed the results of th neighborhood meeting for the Winkler Jackson neighborhood park. I st<ted there were approximately 25 re,--if---t pa_ --it an(' =rt of the meeting was to get their input --_,r the n _ i - - - d I:- Te neighbors were very responsive and shared thei® ide2 for the development of Winkler Jackson Park. Their primary focus seems to be to maintain the park in as natural a state as possible by trying to preserve as much of the natural vegetation as possible. Wayne Sames felt the residents were looking at the park primarily for neighborhood use. Dick Carroll was pleased with the good turnout for this meeting . Both Members Same and Carroll attended the meeting. COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE Ken Vraa updated the Commission on the status of the proposed Community Center. He stated that the Council had given the approval at their April 5, 1988 meeting to go ahead with the RFP to the various architects. Mr. Vraa indicated that the RFP's had been prepared, and had already been distributed to all the architects. He thanked Cerryl esko and Barbara Sellars for accomplishing the task so quickly. The Council also`aree to a joint interview committee consisting of Council members, commission members and. S1-.aff therefore, Mr. Vraa asked for two volunteers from the Com,Ass ion to serve. Dick Carroll volunteered to serve on the joint interview committee as did George Kubik. Wayne Sames indicated he would serve as an alternate. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of April 7, 1988 Meeting Page 13 Ken '.i ~ nought to the attention of rt written by uel Bailey who is an intern i s t1. Recreation Department, regarding swimming pools ve-:~u-~ L k systems. He urged the Commission to read this report as 't-e>r- i a lot of valuable information to be obtained. Mr. Vraa Mel for the excellent job in preparing this extensive DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Mr. Vraa stated that the softball rams, both ~l children are filled to capacity. Intern Bennie Blood i,; wcrrlFti' g on holding the first Mayor's Fishing apene in May. With there being no further business to, Masin moved, Porter seconded with all members voting i favor to adjourn the m_ 'ing. The meeting was adjourned at 10.20 P.M. DATE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM FRO : STEVE SU I , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER D : APRIL , 198 : CONSENT AGENDA - MAY 51 198 1. OT ADDITION E : Rezoning o 2.0 (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 3 lots located along the east side of Nicols Road and south of Cliff Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 31. RECD E kTDATIO : The plat 1.)c subject to a cash parkland dedication and an eight foot wide bituminous trail be placed along Nicols Road. 2. RID HAVEN ADDITION - HAVEN ENTERPRISES: A Preliminary Plat of 5.2 R-1 (Single Family consisting of 14 lots located east of Hwy 13 and sout_~ -)f Sibley Hills Drive in the SW 1/4 of Section 4. RECOMMENDATION* The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 3. EAG D L LE MAY LA 3 ADDITION - OPUS CORP . fNT _ _RI MUTUAL LIFE: A Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres within the Eagarnc11-1I y Lake 1st and 2nd Additions consisting of one .3 acre lot and an Outlet, and a Conditional U for lon sign located south of Lone Oak Road West, a,wy ~ in north half of Section 10. RECOMMENDATION* The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. 4. SILL ADDITION - MICHAEL R. ILL ^ r' _ I NC.: A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, 14.41 LI (Light Industrial) acres to a Planned P:eve<-.~ ?nt and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 4 lots with a priv,"it, school on Lot 1, Block 1, located along the south side of Silver Bell Road in the E 1/4 of Section 19. RECOMMENDATION, The plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication. TO: ADVISORY KS r TI _ I-SIO DATE: APRIL 2, 198 RE*. ALDEN POND ADDITION/ROSEWOOD CORPORATION PROPOSAL The proposal is for the rezoning from R-4 to R-3 and the r--limi- nary plat of 225 townhouse units on 31.2 acres. This parcel is located directly north of Quarry Park. BACKGROUND The action of the Advisory Planning _.c;rnr.i lion at the April 26, 1988 meeting, recommended a continuancf. This was to allow the developer time to schedule a neighborhood meeting. The 7dvisory Planning Commission will review the proposal at the May .~ing. The Advisory Parks Commission has previously reviewed the park dedication requirement in relation to Quarry Park cquisition. (See Figure #1) . The 14 acre Fox Ridge Addit ~ c.i Jit,at ecc ~ southerly 1.4 acres of Quarry Park. Coachman T n a cash dedication. Coachman Oaks condominiY,t ~L northerly 1.38 acres of Quarry Park. The City cg~,?:- pt~ I the remaining 6.5 acres with LAWCON grant funds. These park dedications and purchases resulted in the current parkland con- figuration of 9.28 acres. The subject parcel parkland dedication obligation is still pending. 1 ANSI Several residents of the neighborhood rxprr--- ri , Advisory Planning Commission regarding :he dl on Quarry Park. The primary concern , that the a <r i facilities would not be adequate handl i- :g the additional r s a to occur as a result of the proposed apartments. In review, the park service district has a projected 1900 population of _,466 people. This projection is reflective of several neighborhood park service area populations: o PSA#9 Quarry Park/Pilot Knob Park 3,466 o PSA#16 Blue Cross/Blue Shield 3,332 o PSA#30E Rahn Park 2,963 o PSA#19 Woodhaven Park/Carnelian 51868 Quarry/Pilot Knob Park is the third largest park service a_ ,Z) ~<r within the park system. The park facilities at Quarry include: 2 hockey rinks, free skate area, shelter buildir, trails, picnic area, playground and free standing softball and soccer field. Support facilities at Pilot Knob Park r:-:??re: 2 tennis courts, hockey rink, trails, parking lot, ha J 1,,(_),;-t, play fields and playground. The Commission should notE t S.A. 9 include both Quarry and Pilot Knob Park. Residents also expressed the need for tennis courts within Quarry Park. The existing tennis courts within Pilot Knob Park is within the park service district. The facility standard for ten- nis courts is 1 per 1,750 population. The park system currently has 21 tennis courts which can support a population of 36,750. Constructing the 12 tennis courts propo.,ad at Northview Ath' tic Fields results in facility/population t '`old for 57175 dents. With the construction of 2 t(-nis courts at Burr Caks Park the threshold will be at 61,250. Planning staff estimates that a population of 61,250 could be reached in the mid-1990's. The current population of Eagan is approximately 43,000. Staff's review of facilities within Quarry Park indicate- oten- tial need of a hardcourt play area. The 1987 c-rrict -(-n- structed hardcourts within many neighborhood , way-: ~ with high public usership. The initial facility ptc t-u Quarry Park did not include a hardcourt play area. The development proposal place the three southerly buildings within 30' of the northerly park boundary (See Figure #2). The hockey rinks are setback 40' from this property line and coif ;;,J ,a the westerly 200' of the northwest corner of th< --P~w developer is aware that the hockey rinks are lit. that the proximity of the proposed bu'ldings to ~h< facilities should be buffered by th -r-loper's tional plant material adjacent to the park. 2 The Comprehensive Trails System Plan indicates an eight foot wide bituminous trail along the east side of Coachman Ro-J. T]' developer should also place an 8' wide bituminous trail or south side of Four Oaks Road extending easterly to t] T-ji property. This trail link will provide the opportunity for t~ connection between Quarry and Pilot Knob Park through the Unisys property. FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recd Al- den Pond Addition: 1. The developer provide a park dedication cash contrJL-',t-.on. 2. The City construct a hardcourt play area within Quar_-,1, 3. The developer place additional plant material south of southern three buildings, providing a buffer/transition 1, tween the development and the park. 4. The developer place an 8' bituminous trail on th{ of Coachman Road and along the south side of Four [c extending to the development's easterly property li,, . SSjbls 3 a ,A o tl. i er•, 4i a v' '1 ~OO~ p' q ° v .t Q oal-au ~4 P Is 1~ IE W ~ ~ v. c r n r a..« " H ~ ro N P+P••34 W EYy ° ~uL•,_JI D AD0. . »`,l, COW. wzI >r~ YACt i,f ~'PY'tN IA °0iw FAN4 at a ,;=`:7$GQAG4MtaP! LANDARru~. $ a ( x13.31 ~,orl+ ~t 1 ^ --U R OAKS a. R r: 1 B a PART OF G. :B: o1a31 a ,;y cCy' ~ 2 r ~ i 3 Q p z s v ~t *x LOT r x A ikxi WeWt* dp ~ ' , e®4 '1.We st ®,ft ~ C Wf M• Ao t+4takpi W S 48n W0. !BWlJH.DAWW444 BtWM "s f ~ A e 2 „ . L.xr'(c' ~ n'f '^*....s a.,,. t`;j#'• SBY'iY q"E. :_65441-. i t r yf®., i e rbl s QUARRY `f ao+ WiW cIq al E". 111 W m v olea~-sl ..av,rws w.4e 3aa"s!'6 ii~¢p°' t`ARK 'J" lop 1 rt~AGt IviF-a U 11-7 1k e.°~ lulr a F J C ,rF z iAP yy r~ h I I [7 a~ t zc r m ~ I (7 DLon 'k l t 5 y K 1EMO D TO: ADVISORY AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIV , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS FL"IT E- DATE: MAY 3, 1988 UNISYS ADDITION PROPOSAL The proposal is for the preliminary plat of four lots on two hundred five (205) acres. BA-ICI KGROU The preliminary plat has no park dedication issues." for preliminary plat has provided the opportunity to a pending trails issue. Unisys has a pending agreement t(_ nriect Quarry Park to Pilot Knob Park via a trail through tl,, Ar property. This trail agreement was a result of tax in ---Y financing that they received in 1986. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the possible trail alignments and provided an exhibit indicating a possible alternative. This trail alignment utilizes future boulevard trails as a result of the Alden Pond development and a portion of an unused road section within the Unisys property. Unisys would need to construct two trail links at both ends of the unused road section in order to complete the route. This alternative minimizes trail costs to Ur°sys and provides an effective pedestrian link b the two FOR COMMISSION ACTION To approve the preliminary plat subject to Unisys working with City staff i establishing a pedestrian link between Pilot Knob and Quarry Park. Unisys to construct the trail link within a one year ieframe from final plat approval. 1 r s \777. _ _ j. 17 r R VAN A C ~ "~rr?u.. ~ r.l r 6 ~ as # ~ - F - t ^ c i t lot j e lk MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FRO : STEPHEN SULLIVA , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER ATE: APRIL 29, 1988 SUBJECT: 1' i~i-d ER/JACKSON P- : TEIGH, a'_ On April 12, 1988, a second neighborhood meeting was held concerning the development of Winkler/Jackson Park. The purpose of the meeting was to have the neighborhood review two concept plans which were derived from their input of the initial neighborhood meeting. Bill Bradley, park planning intern, presented two similir concepts. Each concept plan included the following facilities. o Open play area o Hard court o Playground o Picnic Area o Looped bituminous trail o Sliding hill o Security light o Open skate area The concept plans indicted the preservation of significant vegetation. The plans also proposed the placement of a red cedar buffer along Cedar Road and a deciduous overstory buffer along the proposed R-4. A crosswalk with signage was proposed, crossing Slater Road at its intersection with James St-net. The residents support the facility program and prefer-F(1 , c -P, Plan B. (See Figure #1). The only issue to arise was 11r,t?-}2:r- tie free skate should: 1. Be installed on the central low area (A) 2. Be included on the pond (B) 3. Not be included within the park. It seems that the least s-,,-ported of the th_- _ Ls not irc,_°l .t a free skate. The place of the free skat(, an the o reduces the skating seasons o increases maintenance o is less safe for users and maintenance 0 places skating in a natural/aesthetic environment The placement of the free skate within the central low area (A): o increases the length of the skating season o utilizes typical maintenance machinery and time o provides a safe ice surface o places skating in a manmade envir a o places skating closer to the JamfStreet re~~ (230'+) Staff has received a petition from residents within the neighborhood preferring the skating area within the central low area. (Attached) FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following for Winkler/Jackson Park: 1. Approve one of the following open skate alternatives: o Utilize the existing pond for skating (B) o Utilize the central low area (A) o Remove the open skate frc t'.e faci' program 2. Approve Concept B design and layout. SSJbls y Q p ~ ~ u • Oil: o tot< - 0 ti v a p. All a b a R i v 3 t a 41 4 9 1 CC) t e ` 3 0, 0 L i ,tee.. II k, C r~ R .r ' 6 w t f ` ° d t MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY 1, R' ND Ra : KEN , DIRECTOR a PARKS R. .c.210 DATE: APRIL 28, 1988 RE: IRRIGATION - NORTHVIEW PARK ROUND Thu 1984 parks bond referendum provided for the irrigation of i- e four softball and the two soccer fields at Northview Park. four softball fields were completed last year and plans have prepared for the two soccer fields. Since the 1984 bond referendum, the City I pu sd an additional 1 acres next to Northview and lasi_ __r comp'. 1 the grading for the planned expansion of 3 softball field . In conjunction with the planning for the irrigation on the two soccer fields, Staff has expanded the scope of the plnnn i r effort to include irrigation for the 3 new softball fief , the needs of the planned, future park shelter building. requesting authorization tomake expenditures from 11 fund for irrigating and meeting the needs of the - = t I fields. DISCUS S'°C'N ISSUES As the commission is aware, the growth in athletic fields needs has far exceeded projections. one time, it was expected 17aat r to meet field needs they would have to be built some time 1990. Today, it is saf+- to say that Lb ; additi C-zl ski :,-ill need to be ready and ~^x-tiora' b re,-icon, Staff has looked at fief C~, c nd of providing irrigation to the three softball fig i,> t )rthview and at the same time begin planning for the needs for the future park shelter building. Certain economies can be achieved as a result of this planning effort. For example, while trenching in the main lisle for tre irrigation system to the soccer fields, the City it 1>c, install the sanitary sewer line for the park shelter LJ-I'L'J~dd . ADDITIONAL COSTS Staff has estimated that to complete the irrigation syster the three softball fields at Northview, an additional $15,000 sprinkler heads, piping and controls would be requi-- Installation of the sanitary sewer is and $10,000. In total, an additional $25,00" -rom th ,-rk sit'- fund would be necessary in order to provide irrigatlui-i to the three softball fields and to provide for the future sanitary sewer and water to the proposed park shelter building. The department is recommending that this additional funding be provided from th-~ park site fund. r " , T'OT Because the need for additional field space is anticip-. ,1, Commission should begin to discuss plans and st r providing these needed facilities. This memo is not i cover the range of alternatives that might be pursued in ,-d -3 meet these needs, but rather the need for irrigation fo: fields and the economies to complete this work as o Department staff feels that irrigation is a lc 4i--l and will help to develop the fields and make t r when the need arises. FOR COMMISSION ACTION To approve/disapprove additional expenditures of $25,000 from the park site fund for irrigation and sanitary sewer at Northvi a Park in conjunction with the planned irrigation for two s-- fields. :cm MEMORANDUM TO: VISO"7 PARKS D L~. TICIN M-, FROM: KEN V---., DIRECTOR 01 1. REC-.--.-2ION ATE: APRIL , 1988 RE: TRAVELING CONCESSIONS WAGON/JAMES L. SITO REQUEST Attached to this memorandum is a letter from Mr. J_.- e, Sitko requesting permission to operate a traveling conces~,i::- wagon within the various parks in Eagan. Staff spoke with Mr. Sitko to obtain additional information. Mr. Sitko will be present at the Advisory Commission meeting to discuss this request and respond to the Commission members questions. ` ITT-ST Sitko is proposing to operate a cart type conces A Wagon within the parks. His intenticl is to sell hot d c , potato chips, canned soft drinks and "hot tamales" which i essentially a beef mixture wrapped in a corn meal tortilla. Mrs Sitko would obtain the necessary licenses required for this operation from the State of Minnesota as well as meet City licensing requirements. Mr. Sitko would expect to e_ ice primarily community park areas and neighborhood parks events were scheduled; and neighborhood c{__ sales c, an outdoor shopping mall event. City Ordinance prohibits vending of products within the parks without the specific written consent of the City through the Director of Parks and Recreation/City Council. DISCUSSION For the purposes of review, Staff has discussed both the pro. the cons of allowing this enterprise v, i `.u -e into the 1--k system. Proponent views are essentially -at this might be a service to the park users, who may be looking for a food or refreshment item. As an enterprise, why not allow the individual to test the marketplace with his concession wagon, allow the free enterprise system to work? Approval to operate on the streets will be required by the City Council, as is the Blue'~ird ice cream service, therefore, why not allow this enterx to function? If the individual is allowed in the ti .'t a-c~ he not be allowed in the parks? Fu °t r, cca._r f:~~. c set up on a street adjacent to the pars althoujn -t. alJc a specifically within the park itself. Negative comments concerning the operation of h wagons is that it is not a service t-'~ distraction and annoyance. Would it not vo vehicles and pedestrians within the park ®.rea"r ulc the concession lead to more litter and a cleanup expense for the City? What about conflicts with existing park users su,v: as the Eagan Blue Jays or Nortview Park concessions at their softball tournaments? Would not the concessions wagon interfe-re with concessions revenues for these operations? (This issue c t mitigated by extracting a agreemen IrrC the concessions vendor to not interfere wi". ; q in or concessions items are already being If one is allowed, why wouldn't more be allowed and how do ~ :,.I control them? or does the competitive marketplace take over 0 control the number? Perhaps a fee or license permit sho-10 the extracted if this is to be an "exclusive" arrangement b, the concessions individual utilizes city parks and publi, a .1 T9 C'.` YaAfl TT f°t T°` OT" Sev --itil_-~~m5 contacted to learn how wit'- this i - ue. Minneapolis allows mobile units. They charge $700.00 per unit or 150 of gross receipts. Minneapolis issued 10 permits last year. Edina allows them only for special events sucL as tAquatennial. They previously allowed Blue Bell ice but have reversed t1--4 r decision and no longer allow t t to the parks bec_U they are a "disturbance". Bloomington, Plymouth, Mound, St. Paul, do not allow mobile units; allowing concession sales in permanent structures only. Typically, a license fee is required and a percentage of the receipts, from 150 to 250. Richfield does not have an ordinance against thei , but require a license with a fee of $129.00. Peddlerz, -i only remain 10 minutes at any one location. ADDITIONAL REQ)VUIIRREMENTS Should the Advisory Commission act to make a positive recommendation to allow this concessions, Staff js suggesting that some restrictions regarding the concessionaire to discussed and required. These restrictions would cover regarding where the concessions could be located with4n~ ar. f city parks, requirements for a license, the ~3~>~ of requiring liability insurance naming the City ~ c'._icgal 4.1 insured, an expiration date for the permis:n an r~?: Tonal restrictions which may be addressed by the Advisory Commission. FO ,)e7°r - IRY CC. ;I SIC ( The Advisory Commission should review the request from Mr. Sitko and make a recommendation to allow, with conditions, or not to allow the operation of a concessions wagon within Eagan parks. a April 8, 1088 Eagan Park and Recreation Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21100 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Sir. I would like your permission to operate a traveling concession wagon at the various parks in the Eagan area. It is my intention to sell hot dogs, potato chips, hot tamales and canned soft drinks. The wac-on will -neet the current requirements of the State of Minnesota Depar -T,,i-13)t of ealth and will be licensed through them and the City of Eac_---an. I have been a resident of Eagan since relocating to 14i.nnusota from Illinois in 1982. Initially I will be the only operator of the conces- sion, but it is my hope to provide summer employment for teens in the Eagan area. If you require any additional information or have any questions, you may contact me by mail or phone. Thank You James L. itko 1262 Carlson'Lake Lane Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Home Phone 612-452-9841 Work Phone 612-726-3801 l . MEMORANDUM TO: ADV:' C )ARKS AND RI ION -4 RECREATION SUPERVISOR, DOROTHY PET `C ATE: MAY , 1988 SUBJECT: WINTER PROGRAM REPORT The winter programs represent a significant it by the department in terms of planning, actual man h)-trs worked by permanent and seasonal staff and in the frequency/hours of participation in pursuit of winter recreation by the community. It is appropriate that a thorough evaluation of the operation be addressed. The three primary areas of activity to nrf sliding/ sledding and cross country concern are maintenance, staffing, saf.~ty ar,.) "ho partic- , It should be noted at the outset that all of these outdoor wi ter activities rely on the weather. The degree of the departmG,,t's success lies with its ability to plan for all eventualities and play the hand Mother Nature deals. The winter of 1987-88, slow to start, was near perfect, weather wise. SKATING DROGRAM t, aintenanae: The manpower schedule for the base flooding phase is programmed to begin the week after Thanksgiving. This allows three weeks of work prior to the scheduled opening of the rinks. Temperatures in late November/early December were mild and base flooding was unable to c) iii-r,_-!c -til December 14th. Two shifts; 9:30 p.m. - 6:0 . :?O a.m. - 3:30 p.m., applied 480,220 gallons of _ .0:1 :l"r, -9 rink surfaces during the next nine (9) days. All sk -ping sites were able to open on December 23, just four days later than advertised. It is recommended that the two shift approach be continued. In addition, seasonal staff working along side the regular maintenance crew on Saturday/Monday was of significant assistance. The next 8-1/2 weeks provided near perfect temperate.-,-, I maintaining skating surfaces. A new schedule of that included routine brooming and flooding of ri,,-.ks on Saturdays was significant in terms of the quality of ice the department was able to provide for the community. A total of 560,379 gallons of water were applied during the weeks the skating facilities were open. Careful pre-season planning by maintenance evident during the four occasions when snowfalls of art c-- more were experienced. On each occasion all "A" sites were able to open at the normal hour, on two of the occasions all A & B sites were able to open as planned and on each occasion, all snow was cleared and operations were back to normal within 24 hours. A total of four days of rink closing were rienced during the entire season. Three se c;f ;:treme windchills and one due to a brief "melt" .,?i early The ponds at Burr Oaks Park and Cedar Pond Park ac in were difficult to maintain as skating surfaces. The problems experienced included fluctuating water levels, unstable shorelines and uneven thickness of the ice. On one occasion a wheel of a groundsmaster broke through the ice in the center of Cedar Pond. In light of the difficulty and safety n r_~~j ' IJ pond ice in a season of near perfect v-eather it otI' Jl) appropriate for the commission to review the pravtic:, .f skating rinks on ponds in order to give Staff direction regarding Burr Oaks and Cedar Pond for the 1988-89 :-'eating season and for the future regarding other ponds in t~- City which are mentioned as possible rink sites by residue i-' . "I- ' ;:_r Mai t - i, Maintaining the o-•derly, clear ___,ince of th, 'ter buildings was a combined task for t'- seasonal recreutiunal leaders and permanent maintenance ~taff. The success of this approach varied with the level f traffic in a shelter. Site specific instructions were g to the leaders and additional direction .s cxi~ < A~ at supervisory visit. Additionally, othe~~ rll I -~<r such as Tiny Tots placed added press,.,re 01), :lE~< ~g necessities. Consideration should be given, as the department looks to the future, to contractual or specific building maintenance staff who would be able to do regular "deep cleanir::i" ich is difficult to achieve under the current mode of :Lion. arming .Dues Trailers: Again this year, warming house trailers were at Ridgecliff and Pilot Knob. The trailers, 241 8 electrically heated were successful at these sites. The department staff will be suggesting purchasing two trailers as continued use appears to be certain for the next several years. This is economically cheaper than renting if used for a period of time greater than five years. Sites such as Well Site may be identified as a trailer warming house location. Sfi• Prior to the process of recruitment, it was realized that the salary offered to winter recreation leaders would have to be raised in order to compete with naw fast food businesses in the city. The City Council '-p:.)=,veO Lhc- new salary schedule. The number of applicants for the recreation s )nal positions was sufficient. Twenty seven intervic_:t were conducted. Twenty three new staff and nine r,^;__,r.nirg leaders provided 32 enthusiastic, personable, r individuals to host the city's skating and;?_iding facilities. A general preseason orientation session was held, yn been past practice. As the size of the staff has ~zd the number of sites increased, one generic training ssion is in need of review. The leaders primary questions are site specific and those issues are time consuming to adA r c in a generic session. First aid is a second area identi i as requiring additional training. In practice, site specific i_si___ _ ccite by supervisory staff during the fig _ i. days _)i: r z t on. A mid season staff meeting was called to re-emphasize important aspects that were being unevenly addressed. This approach was judged to be very successful. Changes in staff training are important issues to be reviewed prior to the next skating season. -qK4 ingl)'p -dance: GCS -ILL PA : This site was heavily programmed for hockey team practices, the department's speed skating program and was the most popular casual skating site in the city. The site is over used! To alleviate the pressure on the site next season, a cut back in hockey team practices is likely and speed skating should be moved to a new site. BLUE CROSS /BLUE S WT PAR : This new site was no' as heavily as the department had envisioned. was experienced with Gc.t Hill, it frequently takes a season for the public to discover a site. BCBS is one of the sites under consideration for the speed skating program. OUARRY ARK: This new site was identified as the location for the department's adult broomball leagues. A Unisys broomball league also used one rink at Quarry. The growth of broomball from 14 to 23 teams, necessit_ games to be scheduled on Sunday, Monday and Friday eveni rs compared to only Mondays i the past. A minimum number of hockey team practices were s t Quarry. This allowed the site to have hours avail for casual skating. Attendance from the neighborhood was disappointing. most usual attendance figures being 12-15 skaters. -fm_ ".K: Significant n, -(-rs of hours ~c vlc_ 11"i,ere scheduled _t 'in Park, incl.. -.ours. The pattern of u by hockey teams Saturdays have become game days. This change pro, 1,1.<, a programming opportunity for the department. Ideas sac youth b oomball are under consideration. Also, boot hoc:,_ o\, for adults could be addressed. It should be noted that the boards on the hockey rinks at Rahn are deterior.ting and should be considered for replacement or extensJ.,. ir. A general observation is that the :'s classification of rinks is accurate, lev4' e throughout the city conform to what was anticipated. HI VI PARK: As the commission may recall, for the 19"-- 88 skating season, Highview Park was reduced from a hc,c: y rink, pleasure rink, warming shelter site to a :ieighh,,: ain1-d pleasure rink. This change was well ec v:~d by '.l- neighborhood. The department did not rer--i .-ompl regarding the hours or lack of warming h a 0 ' IO - SKATING: The 1987-88 skating season was the longest in duration in the last 10 years. Performance by maintenance was outstanding, ice conditions were excellent. The department experienced improved hospitality at the helters. The primary issues to be addressed -r Season a look at shelter maintenance, a<wji in staff t fining and relocation of program elements. Staff would anticipate that during the next skating -.eaL°;on, neighborhood special events can be planned at a?l rink sites. An apparent resolution of 976 t '-.phone calls will be in place by the 1988-89 winter s_<_ SLIDING ILLS: TRAPP FARM PARK: Lighting of the hill was a positive influence on participation. The major problem is just too many people. This created problems of control. Additional staff were assigned to the site in order that the top <~:r,_d bottom of the hill and the shelter could be monito:1-1-simultaneously. Aspects being considered for prc -)l L 3°4 ,,>?'!_ution for next season include: scarification of the hill to alleviate icing conditions, separation of tubes and plastic sleds, a delineated corridor for walking up the hill, additional signage and an improved sound system. The Director of the department has suggested :>r-~.'e- innovations that would be "fun" yet would help to a3c~.__ safety concerns. Among the ideas are a t°affic lic. a_h--. top of the hill, a tube driver's lic )r t:' , h~ 1 rules and hazardous sport on one side m; x -eting ir_f rmation on the other, "playful" traffic cop attire nor the attendants. The object would be better enforcement of safety factors in a playful, rather than dogmatic manner. Informal sliding hills: Several small bunny h'117, in neighborhood parks are idAntified as official slidi►- This practice will continr-~ with the exception of C d,. d a~; g and walnut Hill where i' noted that intere ,E1: it~ persisted throughout the inter. The departm(~tr to continue to provide for walking by plowing th pui:.aL~. CROSS COUNTRY SKI TRAILS: The city of Lakeville, under contract to the department, again groomed the city's cross country ski trails. The operation was completed three times during the Compaction and lack of significant snowfalls r ► c°1 ~,zd additional grooming. An upgrade of signage for the cross country ski trails is on the agenda for next season. YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: Department staff met with representatives from µl Youth Hockey Associations on a pre and post season basis. Practice schedules were finalized pre-season to meet the association's needs. Use of reserved practice time was monitored during the season. The post season meeting elicited compliments to maintenance on the quality of the ice, provided an indication that the associations were satisfied and stated that the season "went better". A possible new direction for youth hockey in Eac. i revealed to staff. The Eagan Hock- - ssocia'- . In petitioned the Minnesota AmatFeur ..-c .-,,r Asso ; requesting that all youth in the City of agan be ide~l.i,_iod with the EHA. Should this becc r a reality, the impact on city facilities could be as follows: The 100-150 E-j n youth now registered with Mend-Eagan or the Rosemount ~roa Hockey Association would be directed to EHA. All outdo -r practice ice time for EHA comes from the city of Eagan. Communication between staff and the youtl° associations during the season was excellent, staff e to reinforce the neighborhood needs and to create a -tt r overall understanding with officials of the youth associations. SUMMATION: Staff, though satisfied by numerous ouccesses t winter are cognizant that issues in to b€ Primary among them are continued u - if ponce skating surfaces, safety concerns for the Trapp W-rn~, Pa--k sliding hills, new direction and growth for the Eagan Hockey Association and issues relating to shelter building maintenance. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARR RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION ATE: Y 5, 1988 SUBJECT: URBAN REFORESTATION/TRUST FUND St-.ff is asking the Advisory Commission to react to an idea; that of creating a "trust fund" to be used for reforestation efforts in Eagan. BACKGROUND How many times has the Advisory Commission or it,=il heard or perhaps said themselves, "this development is destru>ying a large number of beautiful trees and open space -real', oZ- "the reason we moved to Eagan and liked it here - was because of the open space, hills and trees". This development will destroy all this!" The Advisory Commission and City Council took a significa~-lc . three years ago in an attempt to reduce site dis r - it r_ <is result of development and bolster landscaping in c" by developing a landscaping policy. This policy as pro,,-ed successful in encouraging and requiring additional tree planting, shrubs and greenspace in many of the new commercial areas. Un- fortunately, the policy is not applied to residential areas, nor does it address the long term desirability for developing and en- hancing tree planting, and native vegetation development in other areas of the City. Another "ideal' is being suggested, and the Commission is asked to review this concept to determine if it has merit. The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the idea, and see if it should be refined further for consideration by the Advisory Commission/City Council. TRUST FUND- Scenic Reforestation Contribution n The idea is very simple. A sum of money would be which the interest earnings are used to enhance fog-~e '..rti~,la ef- forts in parks, residential and open space areas. The trust fund would be developed through two sources of revenue. One through gifts and donations and the second through a fee payment on residential/commercial development at the time of building per- mit issuance. This fee is separate and distinguishable from parks dedication, irregardless of the sub-division's meeting of park dedication requirements through a cash, land or PUD agreement; the cash payment per residential unit would still be required and collected with each building permit. The scenic reforestation contribution trust fund would be a dedicated fund and could only be used for the intended purpose. A limit might be set on the size of the endowment from which interest t ing would be used. The purpose of the fund, mentioned earlier, would be to enhance forestation efforts. This idea could be expanded to include an area inherent to the prairie area at Tho' • _s Lalcz. flower bed, or create an arboretum (diE -1 -1, between the proposed community center a,,% a provide assistance in planting programs in e ic1s,E.; L a . 'rn any case, the exact purpose can be refined with the Commi don's input. As to the funding of the dedicated trust fund, if $10.00 living unit were to be assessed o all building permits, the C,,, would have had $12,270 in 1956, and $21,000 in 1987, for a of $33,270. Since development comes primarily from perhaps it would be justifiable to as a t'z v; )u' ' hel A for reforestation efforts. As you know, the City is currently providing limi' fuz within the forestry budget for tree planting. Nn -f-71,1-, , will grow or a the least maintain its preser fund could be seen as an opportunity level of support, rather than be subb ~ ~ general fund dollars allocated for fore- x. O COMMISSION DISCUSSION Staff would like to "brainstorm" with the Advisory Com--i --n regarding this concept. If there is a favorable reactio_i, paps members of the Advisory Commission and staff could it a clear position paper fo- future review the I ri lion. If approved, t i woul<' o ~xa.l with/or without a recom___ _i-1 tion for ac--'c..i and /bls MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL VISE) PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: K V , DIR^CTO Q PARKS D R-C' %I _:_ON DATE: 27, 1 11 - E: COMMUNITY CENTER I By way of periodic memorandums, I will try to k( you n._ the progress being made on the Community CE--t--- -n-` has prepared and distributed to the Advisors W Commission members 3-ring binders contai_i information assembled to date on the Community C nter. This binder can be added to with relative information as the city continues through the architectural/schematic phases over the next several months. You may find it desirable to include these periodic memorandums for future reference to your binders, which are being distributed to you. ARCHI EOT * ~rmlp : The requ f - proposal sent to 11 architectural firm day following Council approval. The RFP also inclu;_.d topographic and site information pertaining to the site pT-C,1;),),-, -,d for the Community Center. In addition to the 11 firm., 3 additional architectural firms requested proposals and they,, oo, were sent the RFP and roposer's form. The proposer's m_g was conducted on April 15, 1988 to respond to questions frr)i architectural firms and to provide additional info - t 'I concerning the project. Resp~: ,-1 are due on Monday, May 2, at 4:30 P.M. Interv are tentatively scheduled for May 10, 1988. Richard Carrc'l and George Kubik from the Advisory Commission have been selected to serve on the interview panel along with Council and Staff. ARCHITECTURAL OBJECTIVES: The architectural objectives have been d_-_ and program writing for the various com,;u. . Gn "focus teams", established to meet and wri_, the d F''; x for each of the components have been meeting periodically. f~_?1 focus team members, numbering approximately 28, met on April 18, to discuss how each focus team was to wore,, th~2 structure of the staff organization as well as their rclE= -°1 responsibilities. The ice arena focus team has already co:p a three hour se7,;ion and developed preliminE-_ry program for the ice ~a -na, team rooms, refrige,-~ room. A second. session is planned to co;%les issues. Other terms have also been meeting to develc- ~a ~s:~ r i g their space need requirements. RESEARCH ISSUES* Both the Director and intern in the departmer Mel B_=111 .l. been doing additional research on of Council f Staff will be facing in the :.:c-,_. research has been done on fees and cl 3, tl-( principle or tee establishment to provide background in-o--nation fort",-, Coin ~_;il. Ultimately, direction from the Council will be required for Staff concerning the development of fees and charges for the facility. Other issues being researched include contracting of cone=c'_ i11cil>, gymnastics use and needs, office space requirement department staff and specific building materials t1W_'_ n,-- V called for in the facility. A itina~ry soils investigation was undertaken to help determir site suitability. The preliminary report co:itains both good and not so good news. Generally, the site to be acceptable and should support a building, although -3e of finding granular soils did not materialize. Of -C , i~ the discovery of a "fill area". TIA z., a rather immediately south of City Hall. , ly, this : t L area is the overburden from when thC 0011ce t~~~ constructed several years ago. This is of some cer.-ern depends I upon the proposed building location and parking lc , etc. If any members of the City Council, Advisory Commission or Staff would like additional information concerning particular of the Community Center or expansion of the items ment c1,1cc<, please feel free to contact me directly. MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION O : EL BAILEY, PARKS RECREATION INTERN KEN V , DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: APRIL 28, 1988 SUBJECT: PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR FEES AND CHA'tGE,: ISSUE The purpose of this memo is to bring out some of the major i for and against the charging of user fees, and fee levels iLo!: parks and recreation services. This will be particularly plicable to the community center since the facility will have services unlike the present ones offered. BACKGROUND This report was completed by the use of twenty recent magazine and journal articles associated and researched in the field of parks and recreation, and in conjunction with the University of Minnesota. These articles were supplied by Dr. Sohn Schultz, Department of Recreation, Parks and LEisur --udies, Tniversity of Minnesota. Dr. Schultz has done a le -.s= of re- search on the philosophy of assessing a. . irargc:~ Lcr parks and recreation. Mel Bailey authored the "study" under the direction of the Director of Parks & Recreation, to help the Commission better un- derstand the issues relative to the philosophy of assessing fees for recreational opportunities. The hope is that the report will help direct the Commission in the assessment of fees for the com- munity center. SUMMARY The major conclusion that can be made is that there are many con- ditions that must be considered in setting fees and charges. The consensus of park and recreation professionals is that public recreation cannot be truly free; some very real costs are in- curred, and they must be met in some way. When the t al vole e of recreation was much smaller, communlt_:,, could z- to sidize programs through taxes. However, as deman" a41ts U. .a higher, the issue cannot continue to be swept under he rug; 't is becoming more and more difficult to meet additional recreation needs when tax revenues have not increased proportionately. There are specific benefits realized when park and recreation departments implement fees and charges. Revenue is generated, costs are defrayed to actual participants, and residents ?Live outside the taxing authority contribute to the expense of par- ticular facility. Some objections to user fees are that they limit parU are double taxing, and often carried "too far" to those services which are fiscally prudent. Staff feels that user fees can be compatible with an emerging ethical imperative for parks and recreation. The key element for this to be successful is to eliminate or minimize the potential negative effect that fees and charges might have. FOR COMMISSION ATTENTION A fees and charge policy has particular importance:, he com- munity center. The issue of generating fees and "revenue producing activities", may well dictate whether the -acility is profitable or subsidized through taxes. Direction will need to be taken in deciding what sere i community center will be used to generate fees. Al will have to be made on special services regard. users paying extra or receiving a discount. It is hoped this "study" will bring to light one of the major issues (fees and charges) in the parks and recreation field today. This study is the first of a two-phase process. Staff ..ill be preparing a second report on "fees and charges ro_icy", d how this directly relates to the community center. As will s pleted once the specific components of the facility are upon. MBjbls ANr I` r loving Fees a C ar es ationale Lost park and recreation agencies have examined or issue of how much should be charged for differ their services. The result is a spectrum of some agencies still attempting to provide all o, t:=_s "free" (depending almost exclusively on tax levy ullI)o, ile others are charging a multitude of fees and often prod?.">.:~i,,g a "profit" or "contingency" on various aspects of their proCr-,Mm, i z-g services. Historically, park and recreation agencie__ have t services "free" or have assessed a no-,i 1_ recent economic conditions and public at- _ti- many agencies are more likely to closely some type of fee structue. As a park and recreation agency explores the issue of and charges, they are faced with the task of discussing h sic philosophies behind the provision of leisure s,-rvi In developing a rationale particularly suited to thei- oi , the need arises to consider both sides of the charge arguments. 7' i; "r C ardin Fees: 1. Fees generate revenue: This helps the agency budget and lessens the burden to the taxpayers, and often serves to improve park services. example, if an enterprise fund is established for a munity program and the profits are put into the fund, ie revenues can be used to offer additional services and/or `:.o make capital improvements. 2. The participants who use a service should hel defra, costs of its provision: In most cases, fees and charges do not cover the total of providing a service. Those who actually use the p should help to pay for it, rather than relying on ti-i general public to entirely subsidize their activities. 3. Fees often instill appreciation: Participants who utilize a service which is "free" ,a- : {.n sociate that value with their experience. When ir- paid, they realize that it "costs" money o pr service, and psychologically develop an D°.atio on the dollar value paid. 1 4. Equit;,y ar uments: A user charge is perhaps the best way of making the person who lives elsewhere (non-resident) contribute to th= cost of the recreational activity. In fact, except :-r person-,l in- come taxes paid to higher levels of g t, I I C1; in turn are used as grants in-aid to local g-- x , _t is the only way non-residents can contribute. 5. Fees to encourage private evelo meat: Private provision of outdoor recreation facilitieE general public use involves many difficult problf u ins:; 1JU11- ing competition from essentially free public E >d ;t entrance of user fees at public areas woula v,e hurdle for private operation. C014SIDERATIONS FOR NOT CHARGING E 1. Fees may limit Participation to those who can tray, and dis- riminate against persons with low-income: The need for recreational opportunities i_ everyone, regardless of the ability to pay. set fees need to be aware of the extent, 1-c i ind characteristics of the low-income population in thei - ice area. There are two replies to the argument. First, prone v taxes, which are the primary source of tax revenues fox local recreation and parks, are regret ive. Th7~L i , F.llc__- ' tend to bear much more heavily on 1- in,--+- ° , i upon higher income groups. This is ----u--- generally represent a larger proportic-i of a rr.'r" - 'S s total income than a wealthier persons income. It '.s en- tirely possible that the poor would be better off if they were charged user prices and given the option of not par- ticipating in offered services, therefore avoiding t', pay- ment, rather than being forced to pay taxes for ces they do not want. Secondly, if some low-income individuals whose L )f serv- ices were to be subsidized, it might be better _.o provide subsidized tickets to them rather than offering the services to everyone at no cost, regardless of their incomes. Such a strategy may be implemented by waiving fees on an in- dividual basis, having local citizens, businesses, or serv- ice clubs provide scholarships or subsidized proc~rz:gal; . 2 2. Fees constitute "double taxation". This term is often referenced by opponents of who state that citizens have already paid for park ai.- recreation services through their taxes. There are two rebuttals to those who believe in the double taxation theory: First, the taxes that citizens pay often do not cover the full cost of providing that service, and second, users who pay a fee and enjoy participating are still subsidized by those tax payers who do not or cannot participate. 3. Philosophical ol,,j -1*`ons: Perhaps the stubbornest objection to user charges is philosophical. Many specialists i parks and recreation are opposed to user charges as matter of principal. They argue that parks should be free to 11, as school, -,r free to all; and that the necessary co-' -hould ome other way. Proponents of this vicar lieve w., tion should be given to convincing publics ofticL the public good of parks and recreation and profe,.'-onals should not give into the current popularity of su,xply-side economics. Thus, their belief is to concentrate on the jus- tification that the general public has been better off for the mere existence of public park and recreation sertii' It would be premature to propose concrete m<na C tives based on the phi] sophical view present r . l of the argument is r )rid _speculation, in ni of cc roboration through disco sion and research. . When carried "too far", fees and charge systems romote_e) ' those services which are fiscally prudent: Often, agencies which adopt a fee and charge system t nd to Judge their program or party„tar service on itr_-k;'44- to generate income. In some _ s, a quality I ro,_ is dropped even though it is sc 'ing an important r, f the community, because it is not generating "enough" it(- when compared to others. A park and recreation agen:y should be sensitive to the entire needs of the community when considering the level of success for a progr<°~r,, not just the revenue generated. Consequently, program:; t c,-n generate revenues can be used to support other pro which are not able to. 3 a. Vulr rability of user fees and chr, der gion• Some ecreation administrators fear that, if user fees and charges were the sole or chief source of revenue, they might be in difficult circumstances i attendance fell off during a economic downturn, or because of taxing limits, :ire forced to raise fees dramatically to make u revenue wit.h.10,:. an increase in program value/ quality. The first situation may be a dubious ar (-r'_1. If sion were severe enough to cause a sig: ' =.~al:it e demand, the situation might be no ett,,::,.r if c- _ i g revenue came from general appropriations, for these would probably also be cut. Moreover, if attendance actually declined, most recreation agencies could make so-i". J11-- ments in operation without critically weaken'n( t ganization on a continuing basis. This a r.~. user charges would completely lose its force i agencies were allowed to carry modest amounts ol t funds forward from one year to the next. 6. Potential unacceptability of user fees to the public: People often object to paying for what has trail i+ ' mn l l y been free or of nominal price. There may be ways, t j to avoid such objections by returning revenues i _o the collecting agency for facility and service Moreover, research has consistently shown a z ial willingness by the public to pay for recrea::i par- ticularly quality programs. 7. Fees may decrease attendance: Many fear that fees will lead to public rejection c services. This is mostly bec iu dark anti recreat. A.'.. t° ices have traditionally been ; t pported t ~ ougY~ t °<KeL and provided "free" to the public. Attendance may be affected if the prices which are imposed are not competitive, i.e., at or below other similar prices in the service area. Many park and recreation departmr-i s take into consideration the service prices of th'-_ sector and set their prices at or slightly below t' because: (1) they o not wish to "undercut" the f the private sector which is supporting the park "tion department through taxes, and (2) unlike r,,-)lic service fee, the private service fee includes a --ant-:_e to realize a profit. CONCLUSION I hope that the discussion above has put some light on one of the most actively debated issues in the parks and recreation field today concerning the financing of activities. The common feeling of p ionals in the field is that public recreation cannot be truly free; some very real costs are in- curred and must be met in some way. A basic philosophical con- cept which is common to many park and recreation agencies is t'-at of basic and special services. often basic services (such as e provision of a well maintained park area with basic buildir, restroo facilities) are provided free. Special - however, which incur additional costs or that are f particular group, are provided for a fee to off-se- f provision. The staff believes that most of the communi y activities would be considered special services, thus requirir, a fee charged. The important question for discussion will be the basic services in the community center, and whether a fee should be charged for their use. For example, a floating device used in the swimming pool and scoreboard use in the ice arena. In regard to the potential discriminatic of - derpriviledged, it i- 14- fees should r-.-'L lLA_ those who can pay. F waivers, discos _.ts, or c t' _ d ; - _ n w s to the fee schedule s_Lould be available to those who o< , n af- ford fees. In the case of entrance fees, providing a free day periodically, or providing special programming targeted at a par- ticular group at a minimal charge could be established. Another concept which is sometimes adopted in parks l tion fee policy is that of charging resident and fees. Often individuals who do not contribute to t. within the agency®s jurisdiction (non-residents) pa-r tional amount in lieu of the property taxes paid by res__'d nt.-. In heavily used areas resident/non-resident fees may be used as a form of rationing, giving priority to the residents who are paying for the service through their taxes. The major problems with enforcing resident/non-resident fees are verifying residency status, public relations, and the difficulty of finding an equi- table method of computing the non-resident fee. The generalizations offered in this study suggest user fees can be compatible with an emerging ethical imperative for the park and recreation profession. They will only be compatible, however, if they reflect a well formed philosophy guiding the to- tal management of a recreational resource. The intention of this paper has been to examine some of the historical and philo=:c,~ - cal issues involved in the decision of whether cc not to fees and charges for park and recreation vir . T' =Fx= has particular importance to the communit-, _,nt . Si__, t: :c majority of activities in the facility woul" be cansider d t- cial services and, thus, a fee charged would be applicable. 5 - The second part of this study will be to set a more specific and charges philosophy for the community center. This wi-i_ e done once the particular components of the facility a e= LU.Le defined. Since the type and design of the particular co.;:onents of the center will likely determine such policy. Bfbls 6 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 GaERAL 550 26,183 64,130 34,597 GOAT HILL 551 4,164 ~355 192,891 35,329 RAHN 552 102,620 147,895 165,114 20,501 NOATIM W 553 125,153 21,846 65,151 199,329 208 1$>%' TRAPP FARM 554 8,803 206,015 203,078 40,580 1,650 460,126 TRAITS 555 0 BLZJE CROSS 556 1,806 126,210 182,286 310,30 BURR OAK 557 8,151 257 2, °10 CARLSON LAKE 598 47 CARNELIAN 19 61 110,167 QUARRY ) 3,563 114 O> r=_ 124,556 CEDAR PCND, 561 12 '(rj o1 CXlMw HCVE 562 1,515 8,665 36 10,216 CINNA 563 10, 32 2,058 3,276 15,662 O' Y 564 123 210 21,067 138,854 160,,A EVERGFUN 565 10,681 8,460 1,931 21,Q7.-'. FISH LAKE 566 46,380 1,511 47,293 E HIGH 567 8,300 3,029 HEINE POO 568 18 18 LAIMIDE 569 304 49,532 iE IS LEK "rW 570 6,561 1,971 q, 532 NSA ,AND 571 7,595 106 92,387 20,110 OAK CHASE 572 8,050 10,104 900 05>4 PERIODT 573 8,950 401 20,720 00 C.71 PILOT KNOB 574 2,520 123 40,583 2,745 45,971 R LIEF 575 15,457 45,215 16,996 32,070 RIVER HILLS 576 6,500 2,358 21 SOUTH OAKS 577 4,789 It 3 11 8,347 WALDEN 578 36 WENT STATION 579 0 ~UODHAVEN 580 88,050 2,330 12,951 2,150 25,481 WDELER 581 17 17 I:STION 582 463 1,908 433,186 5,112 4140,669 WAUVr HILL 583 4,742 115,853 17,203 21,244 159,042 THOMAS LAKE 584 239 175,940 1 ir1" , 179 VIENNA WOOD 585 79,024 TOTAL 370,306 918,024 1,615,655 1,335,894 21247 MEMORANDUM TO ADVISORY I N l iTTC/N G 1l J FROM: KEN VRA , DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MAY , 1988 DEPARTMENT RE: HAPPENINGS 1. The final preparations were completed at Northvi w, Rah Goat Hill Parks for the upcoming baseballfsoftbs.ll n. Special emphasis was put on finishing tough, For irrigation system for both Goat Hill and Nort1 r-< l top dressing, including along ill trench lines, t_p r, of irrigation heads a---' rc , lming of c..rl.~ completed. Softball Licially starts~r May 2nd with the women's 1 g . 2. Department Staff has met with Dakota, Inc., who rr=:ent mentally disabled individuals in trying to fin Ji job opportunities within the Parks and Recreation De??~,rt...ant. Staff will be pursuing the possibilities of co ict cleaning of park shelter buildings and periodic par through this organization. Dakota, Inc. transportation, job supervision and responsibilities so you would contract for their sef.` I an hourly basis by job content rather than time worked. 3. The new park identification signs have been installed at 15 locations. 4. Management burn of the Thomas Lake native prairi completed on Wednesday, April 20, 1988. The preceding the burn provided ideal conditions and thorough burn. Staff will continue to conduct. b -1 burns which are considered to be the best meth,, for maintaining the health of the prairie. 5. Staff has been preparing infields at various sites srrlr7ry neighborhood parks and school district fields. has mainly involved grading and shaping of the infi_Ids. -.e striping operations have also begun at all ballfield locations. 6. The second annual tree sale was conducted on April 30th ith 400 trees being made available to the public at thi:_ 1 . Again, this event was an overwhelming success. 7. Archery standards at Walnut Hill Park have been completely refurbished as a result of damage by a fire set by vandals last fall. 8. Approximately 65 people were present at Quarry Park for the tree planting activities as in of the Arb, celebration. Machu I ,v ,'_ock I.a transplanted from the also received some pl r a_.- v s1__ x , major park landscaping pro j -ct . 9. Recreation Supervisor Paula Nowariak, Interns BC? Blood participated in sponsorship of the Walk Nina program held in St. Paul on Saturday, April 30t1l. year's Walk Minnesota grogram will begin at Blue 1 Shield and is scedu' or April 29, 1989. 10. Intern Bonnie Blood 'i developed th opener" for Sunday, May 1, . < <s. at Fish Lak( k. The !L- 1 1~_g Opener is a take-off on the Governor's pener which is Saturday. 11. Fishing docks have been installed at Trapp Farr,'a Lake Parks and already both parks have been for fishermen and children's use. 12. The hiring of all ;F: s27a1 parks maintenanc has been completed including ballfield atten'_..n_ park attendants, weed inspector and seasonal maintenance. 13. Mr. Alexander Lamers was selected for the Parks Maintenance worker vacancy from an initial field of over 450 applicants. He has an Associates of Arts degree in r_cr t., land management and several years of parks maim -ice with Wright County. He began work this pas'_ 14. With the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the park shelter building at Well Site Park will have to be removed. Because of its condition, the building will be demolished and removed from the site rather than making any atten~4-,"-a to salvage it. In it's place, Staff intends to pL_s_ trailer unit similar to the ones that have been the last two winter seasons, for placement at the w'c._ Site Park. 15. Dorothy Peterson and Paula Nowariak have ~~,k~iplet National Youth Soccer Coach's certification trair:ing fc some 32 soccer coaches recently. The certification progiam is one the department began approximately 2 years ago. 16. Director of Parks and Recreation recently received a ch for $4,000 from the Rahn Parent Teachers Organiz:it`on .Ior a portion of the cost to cover the playgrour^'. -qui rrrr is to be installed between Rahn School any' s equipment will be installed in late June or 17. Playground equipment ha, - been ordu~ - "or Park/School which was de:_i. in coop, _,_ti_.i wi I ; u l District 196. Commission members will recall t. --he school district will be paying 1000 of the co -or this equipment with the department providing all de-° ai:c and installation. This equipment is expected t time in July with installation scheduled to be September 1st. 18. Seventeen co-recreational team: -_-r -a organizational meeting this past Frica, . Iii ; : T > increase of five teams from last yea for a t .l °f 1 teams for the 1988 season. Play begins June 3, 1988 for the co-recreational teams. 19. The Groundpounders Grand Prix Running Series and Wal'" it's third season at Ti Farm Park o: i-day, 8:00 A.M. Again this 1 ar, the run/wal will be volunteers from Jaycees and staff from surroundinc, participating in the running series. Burger King o, is also providing orange drink for this event. > - registration has gone very well and we are expecting to have the largest number of participants in the three year history. 0. Interviewing for summer playground staff has now k c_r~t:r . Approximately 16 returning staff members are expcct-ed meaning the smallest number of new hires for Long time. The summer program begins June 13th and concluc', July 28th. 21. A tennis clinic is scheduled for May 28th at the new courts at Blue Cross/Blue Shield and O'Leary P , i-'~.S for children in the 4th, 5th and 6th grade. This is the -e~;ond year for this tennis clinic program. 22. Registration for summer p ash U11 ins --,~1, 1 1 at the municipal center. Inform( tic r~ i - ining to -ummer programs will be in the Eagan r -,letter which i- nue in resident's homes by May 15th. Should members of the Advisory Commission have qua pertaining to items listed under Department Happenings, p'(< feel free to contact this department. 'Ir • 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.Q. BOX 21144 VAC Eft ON EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 April 25, 1988 DA. P N;., _ : A THEODOR< V- < `TER Council; 6mt-rs THOMAS HEDGES Mr. Chuck Lowrey, Director City Administrator Dakota County Parks EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE 8 5 0 0 127th St. E City Clerk Hasting, MN 55033 Dear Chuck: Please bear with me as I provide you with some background infor- mation prior to asking your assistance. The City will be developing a new neighborhood park called "George Ohmann Park". This park is located immediately west of Parkview Golf Course and is east of Pilot Knob Road. I have enclosed a City map which reflects the general location of this park. As you can see, the park abutts at its southeast corner with Lebanon Hills Regional Park. If you again look at the map, you will notice a residential sub- division immediately east of Parkview Golf Course. This sub- division, Parkcliff, has two trailways that lead off of Parkridge Drive and access Lebanon Hills Park. One trailway access goes to the south, the other to the east. Recently, the department has received two calls from residents within this sub-division concerning access to Ohmann Park. Ob- viously, one access can be by Cliff to Pilot Knob, and Pilot Knob to the park. Another, equally logical means, would be through a trail from the sub-division through Lebanon Hills Park to Ohmann Park. My question to you, on behalf of the residents of this sub- division, can there be a trail from this resident addition to Oh- .c ally mann Park through Lebanon Hills? Although, I am not aware of the history, presumedly there was some discussion regarding a trailway through or into the park when this sub- division was platted several years ago. Perhaps you can recall the intention of the trailway when it was platted. Couldn't this same trailway access be used as a path to Ohmann Park? It Is my belief that such a trailway would be just that - a trail, c ital.o'~t the benefit of it being a hard surface/or of asphalt cogs~;-Li - tion. Perhaps a mowed or woodchip trail would suffice. 1 THE LONE O TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH D GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Z would appreciate your review of this issue to see if such a -trail would be workable and might be accomplished through coor- dination of planning efforts. Thank you for your attention to this issue. inc el , Ken Vraa Director of Parks Recreation fbls cc: Jeannie Eby Tom Hedges, City Administrator Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission Enclosure AN& CITY OF G SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE, (POTTS ADDITION) APPLICANT: KEN POTTS LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 13 REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS, APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 2.0 A (agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single-family) district consisting of three lots located along the east side of Nicols Road and south of Cliff Road. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent land use plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently, there is a home on proposed Lot 2 (28,841 SF). It is 92.5' wide in order to maintain side yard setback requirements. Lot 3 to the south is the same size. Lot 1 contains 24,574 SF but is only 75' wide due to the setback requirements for the existing home. The site is heavily wooded with mature oaks and it falls toward a pending area to the northeast. Both vacant lots would provide nice custom home sites. The existing home has a front yard setback approximately 37' from the Nicols Road right-of-way; Code only requires 30' and the closer the home is to the street, the more trees will be saved. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed by this development involves providing building pads for two homes. The proposed grading plan shows slopes greater than the maximum allowable 3:1 criteria. An area of concern is identified as the very steep (25%-40%) sloped existing topography of the site and the coarse textured soils that are present. The high erosion probability of the natural soils necessitates the need for revegetation of disturbed slope areas in a timely manner. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve this development is readily available along the easterly side of Nicols Road. The development will be required to provide a water service to each of the proposed lots. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is readily available along the westerly side of Nicols Road. The development is required to provide a sanitary sewer service to .,each of the proposed lots. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the site is readily available from Nicols Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development is required to provide sufficient right-of-way for Nicols Road to incorporate the existing water main along the westerly boundary of the proposed site and still maintain the minimum required 30° setback from the right-of-way to the existing home. No regulatory agency permit requirements are anticipated except for the City of Eagan permit required for excavation in public right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY T 259 Storm Sewer Trunk $.056/sf 82,256 $4,606 460 Nicols Road 24.02/ff 264 6,343 TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $10,949 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in. accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with. City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. e POTTS ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, C2, El, El, and Gl. 2. Homes on Lots 1 and 3 shall connect to City water and sewer and 30' front yard setbacks shall be allowed. 3. This development is required to supply each proposed lot with a sanitary sewer and water service. 4. This development is required to dedicate sufficient right- of-way to include the existing water main along the easterly side of Nicols Road but maintain building setbacks in accordance with City Code. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE O 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 5, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS# STANDARD,/ iIA- o d F. i -iC g r Lt! . ap,. .t_t 9A<a i ~A Irt~~~r_ (f rit_(_`nf_>"tnflf.-nii 11 I T P"I""C` I ~1-14_~~ r~~l~i r~r "nrJn l it i ~ lid VI yv-l I'Ll-~i IVY,. Iii i A ! I m~ ~ _ u I ne ~ ~i Ih (l I - I~ I I 9 geld 'y aq~eecQQ - N wn a PRELIO~JAAFV PLAT J R. C e Hill, i c. O s v U FOR nM mx•. u Q N£ m m R. KEN POTTS m tx-~_~ PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS 4750 NiCOLS ROAD. CA-AN. - 15- r>.L•. «..e ••^+.e UaOt JaneES AVF 3 • ptOWmgipn, wa 55a3f a p11Sp4-vn r i n,e In+nlr°t`r. 1"}t:F_~nq'~°d"°ate Rl°r rat' --a,nr. IC^C~rir s°,-n°e IY, 11 V<tlt_..3 ~d1 -1 l.ul_, e-s 1 dIL°AY®>a el./-~IY.~a vd, IB-.+ .°IY r,~lf-•e_A-1' rvr° }a+n^r n r I.A411/ l}I' ~m Iv t c a rc a x ~E ~:a a ~e ~ ~x t - Y «6 is S _ iSr 6, _ S C 7 0 ° R g 7 PRELItAINL'Y 7T mcn. w } b z~rP{jg"~.~ 3 555 1 R Iro~iwnaC ~la rl riP=f_~A U'f IT -r' l-r)nhlf°Pl/~f.)'i n''rr~nr 71 - - W s r N • _ { f . :a~.:~:::•: Via: ` ~U : . J.'. _ ' _ n v .q a.... aµ+ m ~1 I M 9 X445 p5m F' fir- aaa F Y ~ n ( e A-JITIQ to James , PR€ .IMIU49f' PLAT ill, inc. MR. KEN'POTTS PLANNERS l ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS 1 alas nreo~s noao. cA®an. mw. s®rxs wa ~u,+cv ave s a.a.~raa.w as+a ws+a-san lg 4~ ~_f33 ivp inv Pit, ~:x ili: t_sAC)r ~~nrn~~- rsr- -r r.),A, ivt'C7r~i>i n i11 ~lAI1t) 7-1,~i 0 i ss A k „ ®3 k tp 7 I C1_ r7 I jAl S a MR. =ww arse a!c. 9010 i 'AP 9. 8866 - #A-cc s~ 892.3 AP _ " 696 6 - e'' - a 889,3 ` A P -49 900.0 881.7 \2' A-pp 689.0 / -'AP- ' 889 f P-25 7, 894. _ p~ 8880p.5 L1gg scat I 8860 866.5 \AP-4: 894 0 - f- 89045.0 j AlAP- 10 1 /1 25.6 1. \ P > r A:F L t,T AP- -4 r 9159 x~ 9160 L.S, 1 11 fi vv ?T- A .ee_, 12 - r AP '19 I 930,6 0 / f )46.U r ~C r 24' r { Tt SAF_ ' i / 1F5 J 34.0 y~ AP- i a .t x5 336,6 r` 92&U a r 9 O A-gg - '0-8 \ O~A- y 1 AP;p $ e,-xX ;r 9800 W~~~,~^~~~!!/ rc f ~ 965.3 F_'iTA,^~ R a3 -zz \AA L SUBOECT PARCEL ceciqah STORM SEWER approved. standard t :rRLIC plate WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE (RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION) APPLICANT: HAVEN ENTERPRISES LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 14, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submi~_ted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Ridge Haven Addition. T.s plat consists of fourteen single-family lots on 5.2 R-1-zc"ed acres located along the south side of Sibley Hills Drive and east of Highway 13. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently there is an existing homesite on proposed Lot 12 that will be removed. This "stovepipe"-shaped lot is now served by a long, shared driveway with an exception at the northwest portion of the site. The width at the proposed street right-of-way line is 20' and 50' is required. Either a Variance will be necessary or all of the lots will have to be shifted to the east. All other R-1 lot requirements have been satisfied. The lots vary in size from 12,000 SF to 18,600 SF (stovepipe lot). The gross density of the plat is 2.7 units per acre. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 have double frontage on both Sibley Hills Drive and the internal street. Building setbacks of at least 30' will be required along both streets. Sibley Hills Drive will be upgraded to also serve the recently approved Prettyman Addition to the east. This site consists primarily of open grassland with scattered deciduous trees found around the existing home and perimeter property lines. Nearly all of the site will be graded to provide house pad locations. The land falls quickly from the east property line to a more gentle slope all the way to the western property line. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has existing elevation differentials ranging from a high point of approximately 858 in the southeast corner of the site to a low of approximately 788 along the westerly side adjacent to Sibley Hills Drive. A cut area of approximately 20' is required in the southeast corner to achieve the proposed house pad elevation. The remaining portions of the site can achieve proposed house pad elevations with cut/fills of approximately 2'-5'. The grading plan proposes slope areas which exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria. The development proposes to intercept site generated storm water runoff by the storm sewer system in the westerly cul-de-sac. The development does not adequately address the outlet to the proposed storm sewer system. The grading plan will need to be revised to properly identify side lot line drainage swales, especially on the proposed lots along the southerly and easterly sides. The development proposes to remove existing structures from proposed Lots 12 and 13. The existing well and septic system will have to be abandoned in accordance with Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. Storm water runoff from this site will be conveyed by a storm sewer system that outlets into the Minnesota River Valley flood plain. Erosion control measures which limit the amount of sediment movement into the storm sewer system and the Minnesota River are required. The following general criteria in the erosion and sediment control plan need to be addressed prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval: Establishment of vegetation, protection of adjacent properties, and identification of a contact person who will implement and maintain erosion control measures. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve the development is readily available from the existing water main in Sibley Hills Drive. The development will be required to extend the proposed G" water main along Lots 3 and 4 to the northerly boundary of the development. This extension to the northerly property line will enable the development to adequately loop the proposed water main system when the existing water main in the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive is extended easterly to serve the proposed Prettyman Heights Addition. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth is not readily available to serve the development. The development will need to tie into the existing MWCC trunk sanitary sewer line along the easterly side of T.H. 13. The development is required to provide a sanitary sewer and water main service stub to each of the proposed lots. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development proposes to take street access from the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive in one location. This access is then proposed to be extended southerly to a proposed east/west street which will have a cul- de-sac on each end. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS: The development propc,~s_-s to provide sufficient public right-of-way to adequately s°tir~ the development. No additional right-of-way for Sibley Hills %Yive along the westerly and northerly sides of the development is required. The development will be required to provide appropriate utility easements for those public utilities constructed outside of the public right-of-way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policies in effect at this time: PROD DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY r Storm Sewer Trunk $.056/sf 187,569 $10,392 10 Lateral Benefit Trunk Sanitary Sewer 15.85/ff 259.87 4,119 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $14,511 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. All lots shall be serviced and addressed from the internal street (cul-de-sacs). 3. The existing homesite and well/septic system shall be removed or abandoned to City requirements. 4-The development is required to remove the existing well and septic system in accordance with Department of Health and Polution Control Agency requirements. 5.Side lot line drainage swales are required to be defined on the grading plan. 6.An outlet to the proposed storm sewer system is required. 7.The development is required to extend its water main to the northerly property line for connection to the future easterly extended water main in Sibley Hills Drive,. 8.The development is required to execute the appropriate "waiver of assessment' for future street assessments associated with the easterly extension of Sibley Hills Drive. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Tay 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required 'nigh water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. . STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE O 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD g7 ~ / lj{~, II f r , t 1 ' r~ iEkSTAiE q9% ' / ~ LOSF SPUR ~ it ^ 44,: ~ RG / CDUNFRY cLUa r t ~44E r L! '~-.r ~C OACMM N~f ,m r nK5 * ~ R 3 N~1 ;ACMMAry m '.CSR i 1 Z r r o Q 0 4 w!e 0 Qr \ ~L~~. sll~ b' ° }f~~~I ( J~ In m 1~ 'gym ir. Lo 60 yl N Hill M5I.lt rig I fi[ -'~rvi~~ " o it fi +J ~S r x ~i 115 ( i t1 t t ► 3ti! i 1 # S gg .I S `a It !$!d 1 11- I ;I o~ i 277 I i SS t~l f~ ~;l 1~ i Zi i ~ tee '#!'l gga # tl 41 fir, i . 1 7 iM NARY Y S ~ ~tP' PIAT, pRA` /'+hun ty,~~g~i...d[.~/L.ERp3lpN n AF nIDG )1 Y C4 ~eT an4 EM I'+fkfa w,-.+,m.. c-S3.u c # Z. Y I i Z ^ (pF1 Z v C 4 0° 6 n 4 "i nny. 9 ¢ 1 CY g 4== ry~ KNO tE y iit i ttt tx1 •i" I ;I~ } ~1..~ .«s{ 4 7{i I 0~ ! j )IF ek ;I~ r~' `ri Ik 2 I tF ~r1 I ~1 t= ~ ~ r P ~ ' ~ ' M ~ k f Fj i I ~ i E ~Y~ ~ ~ ti.,l ~I ~ gg fat, p ~ ~a as ~~;,nl ~ i'~?~ .I (-.•-f"" x r i~ tt jar t14 I Ill ~ - i S+~ r as E 4 I OLAT, t i W u eT , : '?Pf9r,ON ¢ + i ~ z r 4Y h . , ~nl A ~ ~ a ' ssq rR a a G N . ,Q+(1~ ((1 r( z n l o C Cl) Gry . r T x m sa d ) i ~;r i ate, - T 1 e-° I co E.4 m 4L 4i ~71i Zoe ~ x~ y , i I (,J c - 'F •t ~ U `\I co 0 o u a X-7VI .0 x a l..=m t + p r: +r 1i lp 7 +et~ 3 j! ai 3~i 1 ~1ii~jjta~~ ( (I ( I { "di 11.1i # i+ Of rt 3 li X} } Stye Ifj! (1 I~it 1( (ie i i1 AFC`; [ l(ici3; I -iia I o~ I e1o= S~~?fit t r i 1} b i ! E~ 4 j 1 A d ( Fi e' rP E , i~: it eli ~ g } t o p a • t. J} .3 L- 1110, 1 t~' ,Pi.AT ®RA..jH(• U EROSION r 0 + - _ ..tom LCD D 1 „ A ~ ~ Y'YIDGf~i'iAV t:N / - - DST SF Jft COUNTF CLUE JN CLUB ,LAKE 7Ltt7 _ a 4 Y I A. ia `v ~ J! Nq I i a r I 01 ~ ,c , N-C I M AST . - C -'PART., - t a f 60 H -b ! )ST SPUR s aL . ~ P 1r"~ ' COUNTRY r sr CLUB / H -d FOST NO 3 a w I ~H, 2 l~ ~H _ f f/ - s eR - t 7 K r 24 o oor DP-17 1}=f 80.0 F r s• ._r F RF~991.9 DP- $74 n -k eP- - r 0 a= 78 m. A. Y e 4. [c .i.." ]c d y..n id_ _ s - - MASTER PLAN N DE PA ''Tr„~ N 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (UNISYS PA ADDITION) APPLICANT; UNISYS CORPORATION/CITY OF EAG LOCATION; E 1/2 OF SECTION 9 EXISTING ZONING; (RESEARCH D DEVEZ__~ _,'E"N ) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING; APRIL 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT; APRIL 14, 1988 REPORTED BY; PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been s_;,itted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Unisys Park Addition. This 205-acre site was previously platted in 1983 as the Sperry Park Addition containing two lots---one allowing multiple buildings on a single lot and the other for the City's water tower. This proposed replat will create four lots (including the water tower lot) that will allow individual ownership for each building/lot if ever sold in the future. This is currently the situation with the consolidation facility that is being sold to a pension fund. There will not be any construction as a result of this plat. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The existing Sperry Park plat does not identify all ponding and utility easements necessary to protect the existing and future City public utility needs in this area. The City is requiring a minimum 20' wide easements for a single utility line, such as a water main, and additional easement widths as required by the depth and a minimum of a 10' separation between the utility line. The development is required to dedicate ponding and storm sewer easements necessary to protect the existing as well as future City storm sewer needs as identified in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The development will be required to verify the existing location of the public utility and provide the appropriate easement. The proposed Unisys Park Addition has identified two existing city well sites through easements on the proposed plat. Additional well sites are required on the Unysis site based on the ultimate needs of the water supply system throughout the City of Eagan. Unisys Corporation presently has not executed an agreement with the City which provides for these future well site needs. The city presently is updating their existing Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan which will identify future well site needs on the Unisys property. Current County guidelines for the right-of-way widths for both Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road have increased from the previously dedicated widths to a 75' half right-of-way width requirement. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City special assessment policies: PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY T Future Storm Sewer Trunk $.083/sf 7,947,580 $659,649 6 Lateral Benefit 15.85/ff 2,600 41,210 Trunk Sanitary Sewer 6 Lateral Benefit 21.60/ff 1,054 22,766 Trunk Water Main 200/177 Trailway 13.00/ff 292 3,786.93 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $772,855 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: UNISYS CORPORATION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on Se tember 15, 1987 shall be complied with. Al, Bl, B2, B3, and B4. 2. The development is required to provide the City of Eagan, either by appropriate easements on the plan or by executing the appropriate Unisys/City of Eagan agreement, which will assure the City that future well site needs on the Unisys property will be provided for. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE O 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfall its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD o- d 6 101 uc IIM11F LNF ,1 A I ITIN ( j r'e I ~ 1 I.~ it ~ t Z 1 x X: Z ~ N ' q e: C1 Itl l".' ttt rt Illh* a. e , . r 8 M 8 8^ 9 9 m 6° n M - . » e.e n. ~1•. R5 d{: f. ° r_~. L- e L ANK,Ea , , COODLF.~ rOAUC"; ( r^ 20 ~ z N . SEWS TRUNK - 7,947,880 .F. • AIL 3788.93 F.F. a ARCM 1RAC ALLIANCE UQUN7,77 SURVEY UNtZfS AND EAGAN A, rylict ° -aRY PLAT ?:SLUr7 ti~aCiP"~i_INF i~ Avt)IT1ON c~• ~i ) r. I ~ I _I x f n II 7I / / - 1 t / / 1 p r U II ~ `1 rM1 li 1 11 ~ / F PROPOSED LOT 3 PROPOSED LOT 2 ft 1t 1 °II 1 , T p II 41 PROPOSED LOT 4 ~ 1 f~`, r ___1 _ L • ev w.n .i ww'e.en a •,a~•ases w ,w.e.~ i ® ~ i~- 1 aaaa~s- DOODLE, ~ ROAD G^ FD. PKL 28 a N 11 7!i e B 4 It + x BOUNDARY SURVEY 1~ ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE UNISYS PARK ~)~meS R.I 11II, inc. .n.... EESrFNGi EeRSrsJevEmRs a~ AND EAOAN,MN. - a1+N PRELIMINARY FLAT ^ ° - P >t.l'. ti7 tIFd OF_rl_IMF 1? i AC(`I `t gg ._j II ~ tl4 -r- a f _ [ ~ I ( I j -I 1 (l / ; ~j r I.. _ a ~ ~ 11 ! ~ I t li PROPOSED L07 3 j LOT 2 ~ t II E r r E C, `4, ! °I PROPOSED LOT # II > ~ I I II r° j{" 1 I _ DAMN. e.E D~)OMLF 4r?AU D FT, fV28 ATE LATER AL B BENEFIT TRUNK - 1054 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT TROUNi< - E ARCHITECTURAL AL t IANGE BOUNDARY SURVEY UNISYS PARK 4i 11 111 ' I AND ESA-AN,MN. as PRELIMINARY PLAT _IFi a NUN CLUb a . IAKEi~ N .srl l b 7 j' r~4u. 11,688 0 o. , L t Sut,J! ktitaGE/, „ 8(16.9 ~ ~(y~ 0-h • ~ i~ _ l r I w p and„gawk r9 C 876.0 V t t 24' 878.- 0- 8800 OP-2,,, 874,0, BT~ 4 i w 98,0 70Za c-i c-k l'> rs• 't bp / Tl9,Y- 1 I I e 875.0 di Gr I~~,.e~rr:,4 •t•: 478.0 C-c C DP 2"e C D ?t r 874 6 °s®ra ~s :f CP-5 8. ` J 1 1~0 1 873.0 G.d 't. CP-10 wl Br7Z0 ~i a, Lp 26~/ gg0P CP-7 CP-2 rd rj 1. t 8Jt 765.0 823.5 7ti9.~ o 829.7 r~• rt 'a Z r~ 4 C°Q CP-12- CP-i ~i-UP~23 826.5 825.0 893,0 • 8976 819.6 [D-c ~i 17 - 829.7 ~CP-6 ~4 p 790,7 806.0 78711 Q DP 22 AP-27 i'~I I 99E 2 796.3 880.0 118044 1 11. a -3 ).P-6 CP- 11 844,0 I ( 7r 0 1 . JP-1 t 9b4 ..i rl r F', .1h~R`1 JP-2~'°` a9iJ.d' I 8800 ~ T. :SUBJECT PARCEL ®t., of eagan STORM -7 R approved: standard r. plate L PUBLIC r ,~z VIORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT H SUN CLUES R_ L Aa I 1 i m n r .e 4 H THE Ft L 8. ACRES N L-3 C - H 2 c C-D c TA14,tNVhRi C-G li nLt( 1 AGLTiti 15„ ~CEL i 1. zj+, 1 DEPAHTMENT] M CUxd~p as fi l ti 6j~rs .0 33 PL 48 217 .o 17777,77 I TREFPC N 7 `?d0 Iii k ~ ~ 2 ` _ rtes u J ~ StlC I lI r ( 4MEEA 6 ~ f1=;``'•- „K~ P! ,163.0 d2Ai A ' 30l ! u~ ;T4 K.. _ jw-s 1 d o A > K.w. 10 S - r r np~ e z~ 1xctO: ~a. , sP r ~g o xa C . 6"//` rtiP 6 re.4 ° r2. Mxa 69~dw '12'1930 - 574✓r6 . f 2 ^ 81.0 E' Twf4t A ..ti81840 b SATE (32 kta DA r' r I `a 1 6/ 820 X 5d.2/b7,Q ~T , 2MO I: 410 '0 r~,41 92 d8718to S5 an 51 T rtkOd r 89, Iu3n ob .e~','~r ® ~®ie,es50 Xvy1 C' 24' !c -)4041760 t$• i lQ4 r 3 CEhTt~ 44 100 d4 7 / 88.0 , rho, k _ ~rnu 95 ff I__ h q, T acK{ K r__ Fl~i if22 J- (z 7tV 96.0 e 1 \ 1' ~pc(f C~ -43184.0 HA4l PARCEL F1 city of eagan WATER approved: standard plate 4: PUBLIC 4 RS MASTER PLAN ' DEPART CITY OF EAG SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DEN POND ADDITION) APPLICANT: ROSEWOOD CORPORATION LOCATION: 1/2 OF SECTION EXISTING ZONING: R- (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1988 REPORTED BY. PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Alt1-.1 Pond Addition consisting of 226 rental townhouse units on 31.2 acres located between Coachman Road and the Unisys campus. 7-his site is zoned R-4 (Multiple) and a rezoning to a Townhouse district (R-3) will not be required since the current zoning does allow multiple- dwelling buildings. This proposal is also consistent with the City°s most recent Land Use Plan that designates this area for 6- 12 units per acre. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet will be required since more than 225 units are proposed. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is primarily open grassland with a stand of trees near the southeast portion of the site tax?^ere a ponding area naturally occurs. The site is surrounded by townhouses and the Coachman Oaks Condominiums to the west and the Four Oaks quad-homes to the north. The recently improved ten- acre Quarry Park to the south was designed to accommodate the needs of the large number of multiple dwelling units in the immediate area. An outdoor pool and tot lot will be provided adjacent to the recreation/office building. SITE PLAN: The site plan has changed slightly from the exhibits attached to this report in an effort to eliminate staff concerns about the access points onto Coachman Road. The new plan has a single street extending from Four Oaks Road on the north toward the south connecting to Coachman Road opposite of Snowflake Drive. As a result of this revision and the increased ponding area needed for site runoff, Building 16 (six units) has been eliminated. The overall gross density for the 226 units is 7.43 units per acre. All setbacks for R-3 units were required to be consistent with similar projects. The lot coverage is 17%; R--3 and R-4 projects allow 20%. ALDE FOND ADDITION Thirty-four buildings are proposed---twenty-two eight-plexes, three six-plexes, eight four-plexes and the recreation center near the Snowflake Drive entrance. Each building will be platted on an individual lot with all common areas being maintained by the developer. The building exterior will have prefinished~ siding but the colors have yet to be determined. Each unit has its own heating and cooling system, as well as laundry hookups. A private garage with space for another car in front of it will satisfy the City's parking requirement for multiple dwelling units. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted that listed sizes and species of the proposed plant material for a portion of the project. A detailed plan for the entire site will be required prior to final plat approval. Additional material along Coachman Road should be provided for the privacy of the adjacent units to be consistent with other multiple residential projects that have recently been approved. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading plan submitted with this application proposes cut and fill areas ranging from a fill of approximately 15' around Pond CP-3 in the southeasterly corner of the development to a cut of approximately 17' at the proposed entrance from Four Oaks Road along the northerly side. The proposed grading is contained within the limits of the development. All proposed slope areas appear to meet City Codes and standards. Site generated storm water runoff is proposed to be intercepted by an internal storm sewer system and conveyed to the City storm sewer system. The northerly portion of the site is proposed to drain into the existing system in Four Oaks Road. The development is proposing a small ponding area at the southeast corner of Coachman and Four Oaks Road. This small ponding area will restrict the runoff from the site to capacities which the existing City storm sewer system can accommodate. The remaining portion of the site is proposed to drain into Pond CP-3. Pond CP-3 is identified as a ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The development is proposing to encroach below the recommended 'nigh water elevation identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan along the westerly side of the ponding area. The development is proposing to redefine the ponding area in such a fashion that the lost storage volume on the westerly side of the pond is replaced by an equal volume in the southeast corner of the development. The development is proposing to fill in the area where the existing outlet to Pond CP-3 exists. The development will be responsible for reconstructing the 5 cfs outlet to Pond CP-3- A preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan was submitted as a part of this application. Erosion control measures are required which will limit the amount of sediment entering Pond CP-3 and eventually discharging into the Minnesota River flood plain. The following general criteria need to be addressed in greater detail before a grading permit is granted or a final plat is approved: Vegetation establishment, timing of erosion control measures, construction of sediment basins, and a contact person who is responsible for the construction, implementation and maintenance of erosion control measures for the development is required to be identified on the grading, drainage and erosion control plan. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve the development is readily available from the existing trunk water mains located in Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road. The development will be required to furnish a separate water service to each unit. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity to serve the development is readily available from the existing main in Four Oaks Road, the existing sanitary sewer main along Coachman Road and the existing 15" sanitary sewer trunk which crosses the southerly portion of this site. The development will be responsible for televising the existing sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines which cross the southerly portion of the site prior to any construction activity being allowed, with the tapes of the televising being delivered to the Public Works Department. The aq development will be responsible for any damages which occur to any existing City public utility line as a result of construction activities. The developer is also responsible for maintaining minimum covers on the existing utility lines as well as the reconstruction of the existing structures to accommodate his proposed grading. Each proposed unit requires its individual sanitary sewer service. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The site is proposed to be served by a public street which connects Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road. All units will be served from this internal public street. During the upgrade of Coachman Road, a curb cut opposite Letendre Road was provided for access to this site. The applicant is not receptive to this provided access location and prefers a Coachman Road access southerly of the existing curb cut approximately 250' south of Letendre Road. This proposed location is opposite a private drive which serves the apartment complex along the west side of Coachman Road. The Letendre St./Coachman Road access point would involve the construction of a cul-de-sac street to serve the southerly portion of the site. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The applicant is proposing to dedicate sufficient public right-of-way for the proposed internal public street. Sufficient right-of-way for Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road has been provided with previous platting processes. The development is required to dedicate the appropriate ponding easement for Pond CP -3 to incorporate the proposed high water elevation of 850.5. The development will be required to provide appropriate utility easements for those public utilities which presently exist on the site as well as the proposed public utilities which are constructed outside of public right-of-way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval and in accordance with the city's special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMT 71 Storm Sewer Trunk $.0086/sf 287,416 $ 2,448 70 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer Trunk 26.00/ff 1,040 27,040 8 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 15.85/ff 1,220 19,337 323A Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 21.60/ff 358 7,733 Future Trailway 6.50/ff 2,045.43 13,295 Future Trailway 13.00/ff 508 6,604 TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $76,457 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance wtih the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. S. Easements and Rights-of-belay 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD i A C14 I W. - y you a. ~ - p FOUR QAKS r~AD 1 i L A p\ m G m~ pv~~ w I o, ~ I i ~ O 10 1~ I ~q i o z f o n n ( o I A b o ~ c a I ` ~p w I b{ A~ w 1 ~ .a LE TENDR.E D po 'R-4 C m C rn m m p o o p 5 z :z 1° (A ~ U U n P mm m v_+> xr a O N m m rf ~ (!r ~ c c z. ~ A x rn o~ ~ f Q 1.- . ff .a~ cy A A ~ m to o 7~ ~ m m z r A N A R o m A ~ 1i d N e? Fa t? C7 a c r _ w W a Z N- Z I I PRELI U ILI LN "JT ALDEN I 10 13 21 , 71i L-j i K, J. r ~ rn IIE iYF,.+AL SER,wE DE-if r'..r7T I! 1 - # PF -f -AT OF . x 2L 4 14 777;0, 1 -C9liRT---~~ l~ AtBsld i T_ `n / P3 Z7 w 3 du J - ° r- - SITE DATA EVELOPER r TOTAL AREA id. R£3 JCTKMB Iw_ 1._a `3 ROAAB a w • r"-TARP '®"ER EASEMENT 4.: 3 - .3 a® a - .'H 32 . c_ w recr E ~ O 3 EIGHT UNITa BUI NET El. __S S ENG.N£._R LI UNITS M' =30 EY `HC. U.TEIG ,NaC, j-'°---~`--" -I ...E MINNIJU 55432 N. - 3.4335557 PHONE 90-934O LSCATtc',' "IAP "OTE ACK 30' S.: L ' IT OF E 1 ST ! UNIT atxixma SEE ! FOR - _ URY UTIL- LAY r7 an ME L,.. I E .3MINARY BR, PLAN SURVEY -MG DO L~,.1 EMNWM No- Rob. - ~u ~ ✓ k L l r « jj~ ~ w g . « a ~r 6Apgg / 9 oggrl,) es , 6 P A ' ELI IARY PLAT OF - Z 2on 444 t 2 f k~ ~T U~xs ' A r 3 ~ / ,f p Y 6 . • _ Illy .ice +SeT -^t", wi l I _ SITE DATA C I VELDPER TOTAL AREA Sr.2E ACRES ;r XA \ . 1w_ t, 1." ACRES ssli3AO _ tt` CSAMTAM'3EMER EASEMENT 4.33 ACRES E• I.-.-3231 OCAO N n M n AREA r.so ACRfs -YOR E `sIP T AREA 28 ea ACRES i w Ic EI®HT UNIT WfUf 4 LNMG UNITS a32 A WALLET alwvtyoft w- OLT- M i . M. C INOUSMAL. 90kUYARO 41r - Y a NE NSITT so- WRNEAA .I IS, 53132 ®U aMLf, MN. SOW P9YNaf 790-1940 .,QfaE 890°7790 NOTE LOCATIO WNIMw sfr .C% so' , L STREETS S L ®E CM OF EABAN STANOAR09 Wy[(ffJJ % ITT Ram-r- SEE St 2 FOA PAfURRRARY UTLRY L.Y T SEE S., 3 ECN MINAfiY ".0.4 PLAN .....a. IV" l.nG f j Eagan _LEY o" :~T. zs.IaeT / N Ac wr r z ss. t_ roesr Lwn vRAr.uNa TRUNK 287,416 S.F. STORM SEWER SORM T SEWER TI ' LATERAL BENEFIT _ 1040 F.F. ®L JAY PL AI a zais As - w 20 1 f I _ t t ' I 12 _0 A u x N• w 1 220 F.F. F. VATEsR L,~;- L , t: 1 -358 F.F. OUN CLUO r'~ ST tip tLAKE t t t V:.L~El ~ CAN 111E - ~{~t ~j ACRES COIJ TRY J~_ <<F A- TREF'FLE A( F. S 'i- - .a E Y r e 3 rP~LO PARK'.... . w 9 N r / Tl}~'rl7 N-C /off t f FFR(- 5 Rf ' ADDiTION 1. s l ; R, j ` RIDGE _ ~e _-ACEL . _ r 1 of eagan approved: standard .-'UBLlC SANITARY SEWER _ 2 "IORKS MASTER PLAN DDEPARTMENTI D-b f D-0 a ! L~~ 6 C) 30. D-c D-d 24. CAP-37 D-~ _ D - f' -'-880.0 " -j 3 cC -j 719,7 E e ; r L.S.-4s,~: C-e i C 79- C 87 t G F x r 875 I d ~a• MCP 1~ i _ 7900p' ;ta -2 802.0 87 F.8 - CP-2 i 823.5 t j 829.7 tot 61 C P 1-! C-P f 8M5 f~'a 825.0. na P. _ R r f ,.3 3 of eagan i v • t PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT k r,T - I IZ'{ 4SIHHOOL s 82.Of 2.C _3.p 6 Ige J T `~R' 6 f h6~1 , l - = CQt 4 7 ` 45.8/ 1 .tJq 951) 59.0 rP64:t LEVATED STCRA( ri4 0 4 C ' 99.3/u7e~ :W. L. I0 59 ; V O E • EK....T / f NQUST IA 'eG RK c~ "Zc...a.:69.3/84.0DlT \ r N Y/7/ 74.C 876/1 p L RIQGE 8Y 63918 , a /93.0 57.9/70 16.3/62.0 4/.7.~ ,,u 7S E,vr(8 ~O '0 J R,7/ 3kC C I 7D TREA~'~ VT f ( SU E t,688/84.0 PLANT SITE ATN ADD ft ti (32U.G%D,), l,-lEIGHrSall 91 r5.1 f 92.0 4 •lC 56.2/67.` - ~,~D 90 1 1, f 92 69.5/8I 1,0 / I L30-141 05.c 93 60.4/780 18 30" It U own& Sam" mum arcs i.w ~r►-alrsr lU VlEN is-. 1 r r . ~a. _ a , _T- X6/720 FIG 3 1 of eagan WATER approved : rtC;ard plate 7#: LJ ®'U L1C WORKS MASTER PLAN DE A T ENT t CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE P~~'f_`.T (EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 3RD ADDITION) APPLICANT: OPUS CORP/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE LOCATION; N 1/2 OF SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING.: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING. APRIL 16, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been subm°tte;i requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Eagandale LeMay Lake _ d Addition, consisting of one 2.3 acre lot for a retail convenience center, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign, an automobile service/car wash, a drive-thru food facility, and 3.2 beer sales. This overall plat consists of 8.1 acres including portions of both the Eagandale LeMay Lake lst and 2nd Additions. The 5.8 remaining acres will be platted as an outlot for future development. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: Currently the site is open, flat grassland. Perimeter berming and Greenspire Linden trees were installed at the time Eagandale Place was constructed in order to provide a boulevard effect. The four-sided brick building is approximately 16,000 SF and all NB district Code requirements have been satisfied. Access 4-S provided in two locations off of Eagandale Place and a one-',gay out is near the southeast portion of the site. The potentll drive-thru facility is along the east side of the building with a south to north movement. The owner of the building also constructed the neighborhood center near Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. This building will be more similar in style, though, to the Thomas Lake Center along Cliff Road---both have gabled roof lines. A white dryvit (stucco-like) surface below the green metal mansard roof will contain the building sig age. The major tenants include Kunz Oil and Peoples Plus. Sinc t-,- rear of the building has frontage along Eagandale Boulevard, additional plant material will be necessary to screen this area. Understory trees, staggered conifers, and eventually large shrub beds should be added to be consistent with other retail projects in the City. This can be accomplished with the Final Plat submission. The 25'-tall interior lighted -pylon sign will be very similar to the one along Lexington Avenue. It contains 125 S of signage area per side. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was previously rough graded using excess material from the I-35E construction and under a proposed development plan for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. The proposed grading plan shows cut areas of approximately 5' in the building pad location area to approximately 9' in the north parking lot area. The proposed site grading will have no adverse affect on the adjacent properties. The site iias an existing 4'-6' high berm and 3"-4" trees planted along the westerly and south sides adjacent to Eagandale Place. The development proposes to intercept all site generated runoff in an internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff to the existing City storm sewer system in Eagandale Place. The existing system was adequately sized to receive runoff from this area. Staff advises the applicant to revise the proposed parking lot drainage in the north parking lot to drain to the curb line along the north side versus a central low point as proposed. The main water quality issue for this proposed site is the impact of the site development on the water quality of LeMay Lake. Phosphorous loading models estimate that 2.4 pounds of phosphorous per year are currently being exported to LeMay Lake. After development, an estimated 16.2 pounds of phosphorous per year will be exported to the lake, assuming that Outlot A will have a similar percent of impervious area as Lot 1. Under this assumption, when developed, this site will increase phosphorous loading to LeMay Lake by approximately 2.4%. The following erosion and sediment control general criteria need to be addressed before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval: Establishment of vegetation, protection of adjacent properties, construction access routes identified, and a contact person needs to be identified on the plan who will implement and maintain the erosion control practices should problems arise. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve this development is readily available from the existing water main located in Eagandale Place and has been stubbed to the property line in a location conducive to development. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth to serve this site is readily available from an existing sanitary sewer line in Eagandale Place. The sanitary sewer has been stubbed to the property in a location which is conducive to development. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take street access from Eagandale Place in three locations. The proposed driveway locations along the westerly boundary of this site are required to be lined up with the existing driveways; which serve the LeMay Lake apartment site. The third access location is proposed in a location centered on the easterly property line of the proposed site. This driveway location will serve as a common entry point for the proposed development and future development on the balance of Outlot A. The applicant is proposing a one-way exit from this site at the southeast corner. The idea of a one-way exit from the site in this location is proposed because the southerly parking area is at the rear of the building. Due to the existing street configuration of Eagandale Place, there is very little, if any, potential user traffic which will be coming from the southeast. A "T" access point configuration in the southeast parking lot would provide a less confusing traffic circulation maneuver than the proposed "Y" configuration. The proposed site plan does not provide sufficient room between the westerly gas pump island and the parking lot curb for proper traffic circulation around the pump islands. With a car using the westerly pump island, there is only sufficient room for a single vehicle to pass between the car and the proposed parking lot curb. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY"-PERMITS. Current County guidelines call for dedication of a 75' half right-of-way and restricted access for Lone Oak Road. The City will require the development to dedicate sufficient right-of-way along Eagandale Place to provide at least 8° of boulevard distance between the existing sidewalk and the right- of-way for Eagandale Place. The previous platting processes for the Eagandale Le May Lake Ist and 2nd Additions failed to identify the need for the additional right-of-way along the westerly side of the proposed development. The grading plan indicates that slope easements will be required from the easterly adjacent property. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with City ,'3 cial Assessment Policy #82-1: PROD. DESCRIPTION RATE QTY I 28 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 21.60/ff 211.17 $4,56 Future Trailway 13.00/ff 355.17 4,611 Future Lone Oak Road 111.70/ff 270.17 31,29 TOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $4047 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. EAG DALE L Y LAKE 3RD ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on Septembr 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 3. Additional plant material will be added to the southern property line area to adequately screen the rear side of the building. 4. The development is required to limit the phosphorous transport offsite into LeMay Lake to predevelopment levels. 5. The proposed one-way street on the easterly side of the building is required to be a minimum of 18' wide. 6. The proposed "Y" traffic circulation configuration in the southeast corner of the proposed site is required to be revised to a "T" configuration. 7. A revision to the pump island configuration at the westerly side of the building is required to accommodate the additional right-of-way requirements along Eagandale Place. An 8' separation is required between the back of sidewalk and street right-of-way. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainages and ponding easements to incorporate the required high r~c elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD - 11 4 ExSid 'n f94 ~ ST .SPUR f ~ i / COUNTfii A 7,1 i ! /I wuAY[ LF _ 1 h• _ a. ' 16 z tom'" _ JVF LL~,~~OUARRY ARK r w ~ , I ^ Y t 13sE_` , _q H t S, ti H~ r P 4 f a~~ j rs; `fw i >f . d ak ' t F1 CF p x e k ? WYN. AM t CO ~.NY 'h l p"t coki fEFe q AeAH9 rd - - t~ i 0 r, ~-t ID Le } VtOS ra~OV3 NDdOO i paM c NVld 3115 AF3vNI ll3tld t VZVld kv0 3NOl L,VZV-Ald )fVO 3NOl ' F 3JY ld 31YaYYDY3 _ ~y -•.°'•n WStl em's-.•-- . e OL 6L wr3w .E 3as IJLJL~ ,bL OE x.Owd =101 D Vd eE of wV3V r3w x ,oe of 3rns DS HOW ~Hnes, °1Y axalEtE f \ 1 r.nfnt.N+v a3Yk'103Y EM~Y8t3S ~ ~ l 1 03i0dOtl4 Lot ,rtDx f MnY,f ~ g 4"CwYN Mt aW-", 'a3aA6Yd DMkYVd ~ i ~n", ~ LOL 03- 3w OFEktl Yd _ ~E no Et Y3YV "aT % 1 'ft t0004t Y3tlY 31tE I Owavn vivo 311S 63SOdOdd C 1 o r f j]-jj- f, r I i dw~a LfY3 foaow -ooi avow uvo 3N01 LOW OAK ROAD (CO. RD. 26} _ - _ EAST 80IMQ LA1~ ' h3 i 13 $ <nFZiK_E sG'cl)CF'a4 ra ~ a a _ - r„>+ETU,c.rn H Plant List 'SX'tR.e S !T1 Gly. Cwnnq+ f L.+ W_ Bix. past R-k. GRI. Gryct LNDEr{ 4' ba b - Crt./SSY Si.I.CK 1 j + GNp(E+}ARRY iitt i 1 PktA l+1AY..A pp-irTA (5-CAAVE YS CWT } i ,.,>b.. j HONEY SUEKLE t tt '~T :1 ~ ~ 'r' ~ ft P~f-~` ~8 444444 t a t" Idr .r - t ' i { i { i r { ~ 31Mi✓mL. i-' - 3 C~Oa• D'A+.AAIE~ - .,e, YT t ' F ~ ! t -s., R/OOrT y ~f''LfMOtllf G 35Y .K. GhOAEBGRRY i:P4T ~ x ir-lix E - K'il i" POT xSGF A A 1CY AAPA 6 . ; dq 7 to Ac ^}O1NE t-X JRAIOE W POT ' KE. ~ ~ r ~ ~ i 3 t i - ...ADEL®MVS f'KY.,KDRANGE L S _ [ _ - - N Ga_D uAt^E SR'iRW rY P9f ` ~ j ~ ~-P ~ ~ S u gurfAwA ` ~ 1 ) a 7 1 _ _ ...RF u'vor 3s - a*ia4Y 1- ~ 1 ~ ~n r ro7 ! 7 ~ - - ~ 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ Mm.Kae u _ d ! r S i Sca w „a+ 'ER 3 &A, PM Z .•*j { vv~-i RU3. ~&MA `SGPiDr A' ~Jy~~ i ti 1 t f.<A1A[:A 1 RX.'i ~ b-@ f 7 7 ; fx" LMY~rLY t' ftT r t 'VZ•(Jy„ >=f~ n HEHEROL/.4.is s { _ -A~KHiL444 - 1 1 3 n NwvE 3-1-X151 ,14G 6REENJf3RE L *;,EN {R AVLCJ "ARN S A.1. R-lN(IN BEO$ ! ( VMV, m "`nnn - _ ` EKE BE RGiY _~Ly ~'GTNT t R q,X,y, a ~„y Xa 61 ViRE u A -GRGRN w' BBC 0 11-wELNSYrRE' :.KNi4i5 PM1A405 4iEt7 SGLEND SPRUCE i i „ ° k• $5f~ 1s ryANDrA JUNiPEq dV'DM i q i z ✓J aPERU$ SABNA SUNPrA q Yt•11Y p•+itt ` HEMER OCALL 1$ I ~ bar .~.yY { ~ 6NERc 'p Sr, • r. U B?l ~B 4 .m. sEO r•1 $ g H. . . _ $ 4 d * a LO « s j f,; $ 3 ~ ' a - ` ~ S ® L a =2. h;~j~ J ~ r ~ ~ I u 3 ~ ~~~~L Y ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ L, , 1 1 1 ~ ~ ,3 i i ~ _ r { ~ < ..w ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~f 3 ~i - _ _a. ~ - ~ -r~ i r ~ 4 9 ~ ~ i2 ~ ~ L___i --1 ~ ; C ~ * ~ ~ 31. ~ a ! 1e j it - ~ T.~, - _~l a is i m f h ~ ~ ~ r ' 1 s I~ ~ ~ ~ w ` TONE OAK ROAD (CO, fl0. 28) EAST 40-0 LANE y ATE LATERAL BENEFIT -77 1-7 1 ~I 0, TRUNK - 211.17 F.F. fi TRAIL ~ 355.17 F .F. jh~ ~y ? x PROF )5 Died.,. SITE DATA l 7 WTE AREA 344, 0 tF 0 VAW . AREA ?8.6 t2 01, P ~ A.Kwo RKMdII REOWtED 14P PARK.0 PROVDED: ""'D 144 u NAMACAP 2 y « I TOTAL 107 e enr ' - i ~ 6UX.Df14: a" T i4. l` ..n Y _ ~ nI REAR 9D. of 4 PARKWO COT: f ONT 20 20 E i WE REAR 24 M ' xa I f £AOANDAtE PLACE s r I I k2A ? NP OAle 1 PIELIMINARY SITE PLAN _7- j i R # _ i j c - - Y EAGAM, AL d )TA F A l l a s e . gyp e9Sg; ~ ~ f fill ai"'_ «x 14 p V OWMER \i , O 4 - =ZF F~ yR p • m _ T rTl r ~ t Ll 4 xre _ y or ~ t ~ >N A OD f 10 f SHOT TITLE a O p~ iI.,F ~ SO2 ~AMO~R > a Om I ~ T O O CC m a 65~ T N ~ O C M \ fi m c r e ' ti.d 111 „r,1END{?TA ~ NTSA~ rl "`COST SPUR COUNTRY CLUE# 46Qt72q ,;era ;C i_ u ~p J v f. ~ t e..r r7TREFF, 49.2/ Tr w 1 458/ 910 b7 3 °a E4E 11ELD S T C AE u.5 Hp TAC f 10 N.W.. l06y t r te, w, 5ERViCE - ~ 23 77.f 680 -2) ON 12- 330 579/710 4e 3 02u 9 4 41s7p' 4, ' OQ 300 l a 20" 7a X70 24 o S rt.- _ t a 2.0 ~s r 1', 7 ,t aE ukrGEN~~ 553 7?4r It tyy,T Kh..d ~ P110 6 11 M.. Tc,v of eagan approved :standard WATER plate 4: PUBLIC WORKS _ ` DE PART rr . CITY OF GAN SUBJECT. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ENrM a'te REZONING PRELI INARY° PLAT (SILL ADDITION) APPLICANT: MICHAEL SILL/EDUCATION ALTERNATIVES LOCA'T'ION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1 EXISTING ZO ING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been u-1-witted requesting a Rezoning of 14.41 LI (Light Industrial) < to a Planned Development district and a Preliminary Plat for the Sill Addition. This plat consists of four lots---three for office/showroom use and one for a private school located between Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 just west of the Silver Bell Plaza. The Land Use Guide Plan designates this area Light Industrial; therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. BACKGROUND: There have been two previous preliminary approvals for light industrial-type development on this site (1978 and 1980). One with three lots was final platted but never recorded with the county. This proposal is similar, with both plans having cul-de-sacs extending south from Silver Bell Road in the center of the plat. In 1984, the Council again approved the Preliminary Plat with one lot for the Road Machinery Company. This plat was also never final platted. The site is currently vacant and consists primarily of open grassland. Lot 1 will contain the Tessaract Private School currently leasing space in the Silver Bell Plaza. Their lease expires late this summer. Education Alternatives (Tessaract School) was approved to build their own freestanding facility in the Dallas Development 2nd Addition just north of the Silver Bell Plaza. Due to unforeseen circumstances, final development plans were not consummated and the school had to find another location to construct the building which needs to be operational by September 1988. In an effort to help expedite this process, the City Council, at its April 5 meeting, approved Education Alternatives' request for a building permit after the project receives its Preliminary Plat. Lot 1 (3.0 acres) The 21,000 SF building has not changed from the previous plans. It was designed to meet all office building parking, coverage, and setback requirements in the event that the use would ever change. Thirty-seven 9'-wide parking stalls are desired; Code requires 106 for offices this size. Proof of parking accommodates this requirement. Access will be provided by a one- way west to east drop-off area. Stacking for twenty cars is also possible in this area. This facility is designed to accommodate three hundred children at capacity. However, the intent is not to overcrowd, with a maximum of twenty-two per class. The firs y ear will limit enrollment to one hundred fifty students (seven three and four- year-olds and eighty kindergarten through thire~ grade). The second year will expand to kindergarten through sixth grade. The school will be fully regulated by state educational agencies. The staff will be certified and eventually consist of a full-time administrator, a director, eleven teachers, eleven aides for grades kindergarten through six, seven preschool teachers, and specialty teachers on a limited basis. The school is primarily for families with above-average income and for children demonstrating above-average intelligence. Individuality and the use of progressive learning techniques and equipment will be stressed. The 170-185 day curriculum will be reviewed by the state. Year-round school will be provided if desired. The hours of operation will be 6:00 a.m. to 6;00 p.m., much the same as a day-care facility. Each student will have parental drop-off and pickup. No bus service is provided. The trash enclosure and rooftop fan units will be 4'ncorporated into the stucco or masonry walls. Metal bands and the roof will accent the main structure. Colors should be decided prior to final approval so that the building aesthetically blends in with the rest of the buildings in the Planned Development. The proposed landscape plan is very well done. It demonstrates the creativity of the school officials and the landscape architect by creating play areas defined by landforms and plant material, as well as providing the aesthetic "curb" appeal. No revisions will be necessary for the final plat approval. Lot 2 (3.37 acres) Lot 3 (3.58 acres) Lot 4 (2.55 acres) The applicant wishes to designate these lots for office/warehousing, wholesaling, and showroom use. No specific breakdown has been proposed at this time and since it is a Planned Development district, any building proposal should be brought back through the typical public hearing process to ensure a thorough review by the City. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed preliminary plat consists of four lots with development at this time proposed for Lot 1 only. The site and cul-de-sac street were rough graded under a previous development proposal in 1978. The proposal for the entire 14.4 acres (developed in 1978) shows the easterly portion of this site sloping southeasterly towards Trunk Highway No. 13 and the westerly portion of this site sloping to the northwest towards the intersection of Old Cedar Avenue and Silver Bell Road. The development proposes to direct all site generated runoff from Lot 1 onto the adjacent undeveloped lots. The development is required to intercept all site generated storm water runoff by an internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff by a storm sewer to the existing City system. The City system is adequately sued to accomodate the anticipated flows from the proposed Lot 1 development. The runoff from Lots 2, 3, and 4 is subject to further review in subsequent platting phases. Storm water from the proposed development is rout,3-a through the existing City storm sewer system to the Minnesota .:.iver. Erosion and sediment control measures need to be implemented to keep sediment on site and reduce sediment transport to the Minnesota River. A grading plan was provided for the proposed Lot 1 construction. Proposed lot grades for Lots 2, 3, and 4 were not provided at this time and as a result a thorough review of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan cannot be made. The following general criteria for erosion control need to be addressed before a grading permit is issued for Lot 1: Storm water management, construction access routes and a contact person needs to be identified on the Eresior, and Sediment Control Plan who will be responsible for the maintenance and implementation of the required erosion control measures. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve the development is readily available from the existing water main in the proposed cul-de-sac street. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is readily available in the proposed cul-de-sac street to serve this development. Water and sewer service has been provided to proposed Lots 1 and 2. The development will be required to provide water and sanitary sewer service to all proposed lots. Access to the proposed development is readily available from Silver Bell Road. The preliminary plat shows the proposed lots being served by a cul-de-sac street taking access from Silver Bell Road. The development on Lot 1 is proposing to take access from the proposed cul-de-sac street and Silver Bell Road. The Silver Bell Road access to proposed Lot 1 is required to intersect Silver Bell Road at a right angle opposite the existing curb cut on the north side of the street. Due to the uncertainty of the development on proposed Lots 2, 3, and 4, the development is proposing to construct the proposed cul-de-sac street to a point just southerly of the westerly entrance to proposed Lot 1. Since the development is not proposing to construct the cul-de-sac street to its ultimate design, the development will be responsible for the maintenance on the proposed stub street. The development is proposing a one way traffic maneuver for Lot 1. The entrance point to Lot 1 would be from the proposed north/south cul-de-sac street with the exit onto Silver Bell Road. The development has provided proof of parking for Lot 1 which identifies sufficient room to provide two way traffic circulation through the site should the site develop as an office type use versus the proposed school. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS. The existing sidewalk along the south side of Silver Bell Road is not within the right-of-way proposed to be dedicated by the applicant. This is in conflict with City records because City records show an existing 50 foot half right-of-way for Silver Bell Road in this area. City records show that the existing 5 foot concrete sidewalk along the south side of Silver Bell Road was constructed within the 50 foot half right-of-way. The development is required to dedicate a 40 foot half right-of-way along the westerly side of the property for Old Cedar Avenue. The development is providing sufficient right-of-way for the proposed north/south cul-de-sac street. The development will be required to provide the appropriate ; utility easements for those public utilities constructed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS; The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with present City special assessment policies. PROD # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 274 Trailway $13.00/ff 893 $11,609.00 65 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 21.60/ff 953 20,585.00 Future Nicols Road 90.20/ff 667 60,163.00 66 Lateral Benefit San. Sew. Trunk 15.85/ff 742 11,761.00 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $104,118.00 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. SILL ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on Septembr 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be signed prior to the final plat approval for a five-year period. 3. Lots 2, 3, and 4 shall be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council before any building permits are issued. 4. All buildings shall be architecturally compatible and sce ial emphasis will be placed on achieving a visually pleasing image from Highway 13. 5. All signage shall be subject to the City's one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 6. This development is required to provide an internal storm sewer system to intercept site generated runoff and convey the runoff by storm sewer to the existing City system. 7. Parking lot access from Lot 1 onto Silver Bell Road is required to be at a right angle and opposite the existing drive on the north side of Silver Bell Road 8. A 50' half right-of-way for Silver Bell Road and a 40' half right-of-way for Old Cedar Avenue are required. m STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessrent obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. S. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. - ~ a _ eS jf 00.. ~.tCr---_Rtl it tx 1 Ll ~.}r t V d 1} , 'i 1 Korsunsky Krank Erick"n Architects, Inc. 300 First Avenue North Suite SOO ~ Minneapolis, MN 55401 612/339-4200 963 s 88' 20345' E ^ S i L. V E B. E Lt✓ 2, c) ,b. C} ^ y-- y 5 89'55'48' E .x. _ ~ ♦ pr-a y r.,tA K i PROS h 2r: yA\ i 4 x\sr,+ tc zaa,~3~- 1 83 ff* Z'`$~ ~ L~ ~,1~ ~ x + ,.1 L..i hiAT ~,b taaoV'S~R\AL. FK.AN, ~wasc4ln ~ ~ ' Y~A ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1m1at= 1=aavo~~,ra ~1 e a , FOR: Z 1 ° p , Z_a EDUCATION 4 -------1` } ---F~~. ALTERNATIVES INC. 0 a l _ a R~ 4°, - MINNEAQOtiS, MINN. w ' L i Cl1Tit_1TV FA}C}-.t F.J~i'('S CTtP.i ( GS.r.X-l~'turu .w~..-a'ctia..YT tvC>.i?iG. I . PRELIMINARY tt > ~ ~1T>v -TA PLAT t17T i a-m .c- ~ ie `mot t_o-r z s . sT y ' Z!! -C Janes R. Hill, inc. ~ ~ ' t G' PLANNERS l ENGINEERS lStA'?YEYO~ / ri P 12 ; 1., <xi Lyo .na<. to x,~~.,o. t 14. t a> 4 avse suw,vx Fnse., O~ 04 215 xa t 84i.> test o stn a et 3/9 0) 9 ctfon d8, e 1 4 Q of tnxrapxe30 pSPAN9POATAx1 `xW GNSpO) ATn)1.ATa1OOt 11-1 es e aesa4)t ...WSact ion io 13en9 ®a t t 9 oe y t.o Ri9n>eY x Ko-m,ky Krnnk &,..k Awhile-IA, inc. acraiar N-th .;ii,up, t.tn X401 SITE 'YN - - - - -s-- PROVi DED SILVER BEEF ROAD 4"", E> ~ FOR SIDEWALK Bf ;;^Exi$YMG ASPNAU " WAIX PARKwC, i ` 6ACK _ Pp P£RTY LINE - 60 20'-0' TYP 0- "W TYP t1NE WAY Ott CY f, - n f1 E* I/~iZ .,A r p LT / tLL21f 1~.1~ _ x' I IoNEY L 1,' SOP-OEE - A Rr EACtJi, sOTA I~ To' " GATE . _ ) QAl FC}I 'rtF~ yy 4 ~ 13t~'it i I P~ S01001- f. i f s K wE5 INC. -F.) _ rnIr MINN. I W 00, 180 )l' ZJ5 ro - SEI UACK ZSnN11 ARIA Wl 1 It L r AvSRXi 1 J Piny AREA ~ % MYL COATED CNMN LNA FENCE TYP. > OPERTY EINE 14 -ITF 1 4 15 30 50 P" C: DATA 130,678.13 SY, PART , . RI -W _TQ A,CK$ Dele R 2.99 ACRES - •/RfN@_ SID[.,.:.,,,., Bt AREA 21,000 G.S.F. Wit„ APPROVE[) HY CITY - LOT -P n ,E PR a n :Y 20% i5t 27, ViSt1ORS10 37 CARS 16.0?` `TBACKS 20 E1 i 5 FL o~I ,CI rcn t I „ RE 20 Fl, I H Slieei P, Korsunsky Kra- Es son Architects, inc. 7 awvr ruvu oa.* wr.e-,rorN 340 ir°' tr~nu, Worth 1'e, K, "im klN -,401 n rl. n.r, o i 2, i+ <x.os~.Y a-K.... a=o.e.caMY toe, II sIT( acno~ c. ..HFc,.~*rsr SI ER SEES AD _ m' ~ sr 4 (TJ~I l4vM+ t ~TM-rt 4`PN 1..~ 1 m~ ~ Sat ^y n a PROPER T- o~ ~ ihsamff It 3 p}x5}'+I(PN !"inti:A) EAGAN, MiNNESOTn f URB f UT 1 it' C COCO71CO C"J9NiXXy wirer' rlTt a++t I r _ rAxRl 3 R: Maernn~abr.act ALTERNATIVES ION - 3 Nuf wvrc I f rv..~ uuCf.» MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. PROPOSED SCHOOL i 7 f 'rocn~. t Carn*+tb .,w~u"C. j l I j (21,000 S.F.) OR fx~. R, f ~w r c. 2 rncs.k.r,f u~ I ~ J ~ I a1a4+~dar~ n'""A""' ~ . 2h' sernnt II 31 ~s , TZ ' I t tz txo cawu iwue - I- - t n r m r~rnuv caraoo - - L t4l M tptn~lrW P)89>`.I JN.eE Y - - tm w trt 4' a.G. PROVrR 114--¢Nnhm.;as (a Fi,it.R Fi fr6 ~TRMKCCwNET- +-'f ibWS ElJIrG _ _ ~ _ 4 worn < r, tkPlfRSf{€R C 30' o,e, *1- . p~ rwet.P nvrr ttwr+x-r+.~ G >.r u.+cw NORTH SITE F t- ANT Se, HEDV L.a PLAN ma tt.. d.~. 11ti,{(►+MI -E 4•ww sr f~~r~• NihMIMs. f .ItF "IT 4 15 34 64 -W c..amr •n r.POn w„ ap.,~ M m.. « anew ,ry a~ tr a wpaz.kxn, u+a mew ~ m . axp npim®rvq Mer r --5z s wa.r m. uw.am. s~.w !t MMf- - ~.t. G- ua a ~ 9 ~YMRi n - - - D as K IT' -I_ ° V-16 9T -IT. i rvp+e.ywrv. f .EF>( ww«n'Yai%wn u lM k w+is m we „+weww w..+so r+.,..r. Pr~eq Na 879-OQS-21 Strew RrR wr ~ M.nsr+u~n~n+n.r 'AW M+e1(r5ti'"11 - MLYOb'~~.•^c1L wy1a ~ ~ w~ Cwt ~m.w.w ~w Date 0-1588 I ~ --ww.+. wpm •La+a> 8y 5 ( ~ ClrerAced al FV' of Korsnnsky Krank Ey . m....-tests, In 6 /339- CUT I _ =I-PA CUT 'U- CUT Ti N£MOYE E 9 RUN YE EXISTING SIII tl( II UTMCTER A 4 T CUR n -TIER PROPOSED Sip£W AS.K EASEMENT COREi_ YAIt fTER at ANC -01 WT SILVER [JEI1 ROAD ~ - CUR IE BETE YAILEY_ ( tP i ta. LK I~ O (ET -z REMOVE SlDEWAL _ - S' TRANSIT i I I" V~`ti J.vi w nih \ -I98' ( 7• Ra , aY i1~ L~.R cT l\ IY_ ~ EA(.AN, MANIQS(}ii 4. t jJ(J v TRANSITION SIM-LK I w FOR: Lv.. EDUCATION 3 PRC)F(xr: r sGiocx ( AITERNAI IVES INC. COURSE AGGREG i T (21,000 S.F_) MWNEAPQUS, MINN, ' STREET RUNOFF I dr GROU SEDIMENT TRAP R FINISH FLOOR Et" ~c r,~ I } PAVED PLAY AREA ` 'ti_~'ft{ ✓~0 m °RADI9tl ~p C, zyaJ E 0 15 34 60 GUTTER CURB OPENING AT GATE SECTI •s NOCe Date o- a<, 9 L SECTION C-C e... u.',..-SEC JN - ~ s SECTION D-D e< . xawl~rs. : ss tz Gunn s u~xrsu C4tfCp@7E VALLEY GUTTER 03-7= .N°•~''-re- - CUE J 7, A Km -,jn®ky Krank Erickson Archi=_=ete, Inc. Avenue North - ale -I,:r i,t,nn..,,.i,, tl., =fN 55401 - 11213;;'1 42130 i ICURi CUT _ -Ili tUT 'tURi CC-~T) 1110 CUT, PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT S tt SESiid>!+ S11111LUMAD ° r[S)Yt[tY (IMP i 2W-0• TYP RELOCAT[ NYA ~A,r ,TR r TESSEI~T ANNAMMA-s r 60 tME[ -I If [YI B-9 ONE WAY ONtY r r s MWf50TA Iii SSA it FOR; All-111 s EDUCATION ALTERNATIVES INC. a-raue MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (21,400 S.PJ 1 i V,tRAIN(; iT ~(xi~ I ~ i I ~T it f~f SIiNAft (i t rye;. FIN118H FLOOR r ~1 ~ QLYV 9000 _ A -i tiS %rtr{ nus d , l)O'_{~O1Ptpnr-vi'd<ireA) i I< _ ' Iva ProT A) i >o sexo INn 1+nIN ~ co no c [ a Ii K f1 NCt l 9 ~ ' 2 > PRELII - 4'7- ! 1lOP111Y IINI UTILITY ! Y ? ~ S_IS-Fb 7 NORTH =~a 0 .e o. w s 15 30 60 UTILITIES LEGEND ::::Ti 0IANITART89WIR LEGEND % P. D -i--- [si®TIMA I"— ®[wtW tx isTNIN a{-i1 cUSil s Ive-1 9 YkwXK RROROI[D IA0NNAAY i1w1A __-src- .era.- rROrosen ss-11 Cvra s Cv'rxea PROYOI[D wkitR MAIN PtAeoseo ai-i& cVFV s 6(YTTCx ~ ~ _ Propct MD. S70t3O2S-01 9Md DNy 216$5 @.wn ar •j' CP~kM W ad Arch,;=pct ie North x...131!., ~ , 5 01 t t ~ t Ilt:; -9 SATE 5ECTfON asea PROV 70R Ai% O SILVER I ROAD r omm m G4B - - npW _N'4 t~r F i t+; ~_Msl As, :i. ii~:._- 12 6 ( i YPI or+E wnY OWE 1- f f ~ f J I I' E SSERAcT Ro O TI3 _ l "mil! ~ ~_6 r I I Y ~ ~ M ~ ' tn~.w+ hvwt5<)iA GATE FOR: a - - T / - EDUCATION 14 2 PROPOSED OFFICE P ALTERNATIVES !NC I (21,000 S.F.) MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. SMACK FIN. FLR. EL 800.00• zip'. ' . - _ ! p i ' ~ W#Yt COATED CtN ° _.as- s 541.11' ~ - PROQ£RTY FIN$ } ° r~ +C% gP 0"": F NORTH y fg ' J 0 15 30 60 ve. m. wm a p» see a o.w fEN2, PROJECT DATA E AREA 130,618.13 ST, _G s ~ TBACKS 149 ACRES n. D 112 SPACI 3. ra a» r 9 ~JING AREA 21,oo0 G.S.F. PACES LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED 11 - SPAC! s AILOWID: 20% A JAL 16,0; ! SETBACKS tT >MNG I I ,S f ilul m-,~..Re R ' p,. ; F P! ZONING PD 0 FRICT) or w o 1N\ LT.ISNC ) NI: :NIDNI GNV DNINNHId ~ A1ddns n Alf ~ 3VN Cb'Oa W w DUl ' - Nd~d z NIGVHD 11.H 'NSat l1L[ • ~YOC iO A110 NOI nnv 111., 'N -HU)ILN x i 0 k ~ s u F y Y W ~i O s rs u0 7 E 1 u C p W 3 7 L W 1 a K C n ~ a K ~`y N 2 _ a 't', b n U ~ O I Il (y ~ ~ t - ~ d Q . %N r - x \f a o a x II ICI A ~~V A h x o QQ ~ ~ f I I l t I _ ~ ' I I ~ I l IV / tA~\i IIII ~~u `c I~\e\ \ I t~ p z,4 ~ L ~ \ t -wy rf w ~y 1 III lI aN ( s Ili i ~ ~ ~ n~ I ~ I ~ ~ Tl, I 3AV ~dQ3~ -)9v ON AGMH9IN iNnai a - -i AIL - 893 .F STREET IMPROVEMENTS IC I_ - 7 F.F. Kornunmkt Kc®nk Erickson Archlfi inc. 300 Fir,1 A-- Noah { S . M~1t° N 15901 612!3; v-3 iH) 113 5 88' 10' 15' E J S L. V (3 E L-L- 933 r 51!9 3~'.'~° E - ~ , wue ro~ - o C1 A, Q s f ~._-T l2oRnE^ urxx " i ~N-77', o.. { ortr• ~ \AA > . I 1 . . I j ti I I , ~ r.3-E..~ TEssERAcT' l I I I t was o a+scxs-rczaAl fx; , waa 1 C-A f { ~ ~z3zs~B.s,NC.,-P c3 \ { { L1sc r nor o~c is FOR 1 \ of - L. ~..<..a,.c e VES INC. t \ ~ I I zc,:,, c. \ \ I I 1rr Z i Owe.sC..$~ a1 4 l e rr g L- , t ~ ao J 3 a0 mac. ' -RS SLWEYORS 1 s It .{tp ~ao~c ausscc.-e- - _ F ~a # !mx 9 at tM seat 1 oS Ba ; tk rf Bnx o B htP'c e;-0tDD33gi y.p k1fr88 Illannumlilailil~Iiil~ SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LATERAL BENEFIT ~ 742 F.F. WATER LATERAL TRUNK BENEFIT -c 953 F.F. oreunsky Krank grief a Archilecla, Inc, 300 First A,,nur North ( Suitr 500 i ` Minnrapiis, MN 55401 6121339-8200 ?t f+I I - - - - I - 5 l ( r xraTlrac zo*>!c- TESSERAcT' t 1 i I --i ut,no'rE.Ca ssst.l-rc_tAL, 1--. soya ~ ,,r~ 'C p B I I ~ - l I y I Ua>=. c>aovo~~,cs 11 ~1 , D .rre., acuno~. FOR: EDUCATION 0 = k Q I ® --------------L _ - - ® ..a._~-a, ALTERNATIVES INC. } r i tMlNNfAl'OtiS, MINN. I I 'Z-° I c~w~s~ 11 > i i U I caacwac_B, a aa~ ( uwc+++aBCw,at sue. a~.>> w.,X..,w+awAY to t ~ ~ \L/ s/ s..vaG.c,B..vu v ,g d ~ PRELi M RY i I s' 11 p®-T a PLAT I L„ `tee r lcrr 9 s. : 3• Ac. i JOi./ IeIIP /9 d4.. R.ANNERS / ENGINEERS f SURvEyM ➢ o°n 1 ~ fr pG sbs.r.aA o, sea. ~r.a . dea- C I r 'es ~ a aao.,.a s...g / [sue R\p Aea-+e. mua~.c.T -ro a» ! N e 2.5" 3B-t e ~dgFi°c ~ if iy~ng a ~u~ a~a~3ozisrr , , a.~go a a 7Z5 7Z r ~1.0 4 kf 5 3y-- C. I 1 ' -r -i : cit%i of ! PUBLk- WATER `'ARKS MASTER PLAN m D E PA P T Control Commission ° ` Seneca Plant 2 r lig v «`5t i/. C.C. JJJ ~ ,r A f : b x f 11 1 ur s i Interceptor - 15°` ~ i► . ~,r~~w0~'E1V F~ IG 4#* 2 1 SANITARY SEWER approved. plate city of eagan standard PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT