Loading...
10/01/1987 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission m _ ► 1987 6, .1 , --tir- t lpc l ,.E , A. Il to w aad Pledge of llegi t B. -o 1 of c` and Approval of 0, I of 1. r- - Addition 2. - Chester n - Addition . Cedar Cliff ial - 3rd Addition . Yor f=- IndL-tri-l Park South 2nd Addition D. 7'r posals 1. M : l - 3r Addition E. lc n- ss 2. '~Il n aka k _ f ---r - e--*. - 3. )o sal for atric'. _ . _ 3rd dditic - Prop <i of City Code Notation. 1. Survey Adult Softbal'- ®ilities Parks Development 1. { uctiot . , ' :.L Ridge r, - %.onSt- Needs Other Business Reports 1. h Rob, r _ NT-f-hview Park is rt . T 5. A: I. Round J. Ad- c MINUTES C `1 -TING 01 Subject ~ A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreatir n was called to order by Chairman Roger Martin, at 7-40 P.M., M, a' were Porter, Sames, Masin, Alt, Martin, Carroll, Thursto-, Members Berg and Kubik indicated that ths,7 would " commitments. Staff pr i' were Directo°., Parks Planner/Landscap ~~itect, Steph-i John VonDeLinde. :aU A motion by Porter, seconded by Sames, with all 'n favor, the agenda was approved. -S OF f ' ° y r.-l changes 'e noted in Cc ion , 1987. Page 3, Number 2, should read .5 acres and Item 5, s' 'uld i t. On age 5, the year 1988, should be substituted for the y ar 19 A ri-'_ion by r roll, seconded by Thurston, --i' -11 members votin in favor, the __inutes '-_--ust 6, 1987 were approved _ -ded. PARKS It was noted that the Advis-ry Commission oi-pde;' meeting with a tour o park facilities, inc_t construction, and the proposed Cliff Lake - Galleria dev(lopment. "I'"ITFSHT AGENDA ITEMS The following _c Benda items were > Following a motion by Carroll, bonded by Masin, all the Commission approved r:c d- ':ion to the City Co i on g items: 1. Dodd Farm ® That this plat be subject to a cash dedication re,,u for the newly created lots. 2. Cedar Cliff Commercial - That this plat subject to c edication requirement consistent with the City's C vial/°i a". Policy. . Galaxie Place Addition - That this plat be subject t n requirement consistent with the City's Commercial /Indu, 1 a trailway along Galaxie drive, and a trailway along any x_c ~'nal road as depicted in the site plan. 1 P i - A Director of Parks and Recreation, Kr- Vraa, noted ':his particular preliminary plat involves a number o issues including ing, which is to be resolved by the Advisory Planning C aion and ),U cil. He stated the Vv sory Commissi- should be concern,'. about tY- t s it relates to , in tha' is being covered by U. ills West PUD develc,, at. Planner, Jim Sturm, gave an overview of the rr stating that the Advisory Planning Commission had defer--( thirty (30) days for further study. Com-* °4.on Masin quest" c u b~al District had responded with any concerns L,`;ive to this d d it's location to Rahn School. Other members qu_stioned traffic ite. Mr. Peter Beck, At'. for tl himself, noting that Mr. RoffmL-. -'I'- had Cliff Road, which would reduce rr J traffic . )y saying that the developer is still anticipating mi' family l development along the park and Shale Lane, of appr c Lt ly t ( E } acres. Peter Beck also stated that part of the PUD 1- t" the City had previously been made. The developer r___ c the additional dedication with the development of the --31dential . ®eck stat i that he underst;_l the _ _ I. y .t,:; and the ~4-e to save al d e- o modify it a plan, wh', a u 1 Beck then pri >nted a graphic represe ';Ing the tuber of also stated that between thirty (30) and sixty (60) - three inch Oe saved by transplantation. Chairman Martin questioned whether a tre) had been prepared? Mr. Beck stated that this was being done at pr Sturm stated that the City has not yet reviewed the 1r adsca, presented to date. After considerable discussion conce, 'fc existing vegetation, Mr. Caponi noted that the develo.), substantial number of tree-; he questioned whether the would be realistic, inasr, h as grading that close woul' He said, he hoped the Co: °rs ion would not be misled by t' . Beck stated that the developer would be responsible for tree as? the event a tree died. Mr. Caponi then questioned about the bd~: building and it's appearance, noting that a road to the back would c' y mean there would be clutter and would not be very appeal-ng that o the lake. Mr. D- k stated the truck ould be be',.-Ld a E-, f °e would be no i d do ~s or load ock. below grade, ' h e _ 11. be a b - with T Martin questione'. 'I - of ears that would Beck responded that the agineers have estimated bet. 0C Mr. Martin questioned the number of cars adjacent to the parl_ for traffic and the impact. Member Thurston also expre" relative to the safety of park users with that amount of i responded that approximately 7% of the traffic would go to t developer proposes to further restrict truck traffic. . developer would be willing to we "'a the Cit., and it ' 1' along Rahn Road to preserve the ;at' ' y r-f RinIb?° pare w a this would be helpful. There L us qv Lor r which the developer responded to. Mr. Martin noted that the C -i,sion f alr--(':r v hour covering the issues and conce_c_- the 4a'30r- suggested that the Commission establish _ special r c!ting to 2 items, i he Cc_ elt comfortab' w y~ in to make a ation at t' _ t: me. Other me t t' .e need for a opecial meeting. In response Uv ky stated that a traffic study was being done t th= . that he felt the developer's information was incomplete and Commission's decision to delay this item for thirty (30) days u: was obtained. Roger Martin questioned wheth{ would be po, Commission to meet before the Planning Co i s o thai-. i e be transferred to them. Mr. Beck and Mr. He®" _caed t happy to e to any meeting by the Advisor_ W -n. the Commis -i sn decided to meet on Tuesday, k 15th, f . , e lunchroom to ---ver the concerns of the Advi: ):y Cunuui,sion. Bertz arrived at 8:40 P.M. and Mr,Kubik at 9:10 P.M. ST.FRANCIS WOODS - 6TH ADDITION Planner Sturm reviewed the proposed St. '.tion, noting that the 5th Addition had p >osed mL _lings. f'° € review b_r Advisory C( n, a , ded by --ith a1" -w voting in f< r, th^ " _ eco _ t. --..._sh dedic_ _ r =quirement fo_° the n( r , -m-1 this develol --nt be respi-1-1 le for ensuring that the Lexington Avenue, which was a requirement for the St. F: leis Woods Addition, be complied with. BL i P" Stu `;he pr ( c -t was noted thau t1is pare s contained Iit A therefore no c_sh or lan-'. d __lcation we _I' d =rluf Commission members noted that it appeared then would t w- ng City parkland. Member Thurston suggested that the d+ lcaer should 'k the City staff to eliminate this grad *ia, or at least _ no distruption to existing tree. nirector of , noted that there would be a ne i b y of a trailw, y Park, and that this developer a: ' the developer f Blackhawk Glen 3r' Addition), have been working t LLI issues. After -d,"'--nal discussion, on a motion Vy .Alt, with all m( > oting in favor, the Advisory Cc ' E'' _ that there be no g- ling on the triangle of property owned by the Cit_, ,s to alleviate any loss of Oaks or important v tati_n. Further, the dev toper should work with City staff to r;vi this g diig plan, V-e tr ' 1 way be coordinated -ith staff and cent d lnnp.r, A A , see x ation pond be coon ` ®nated with dept %aff. 11 eas rent be provided to _ existing Oak veg on f the plat. & REPORT Chairman Martin noted with the presence of the i n r _ i ff, it would be appropriate for the Com:-- 3, to -U-1 prG, 2eport ® Commission member Bertz, state.] 1 was Liven, ie wished to make note that the soccer coa(' a her an appreciation of the coaches clinic held by t-- d d that the coaches found this very valuable and was .ted® 3 Dorothy Peterson reported on the Eagan Stage Door Performers Organization, stating that the group now has a board of directors, and is working on a 501-3C status. He stated that the group has receieved an offer for costumes from a defunct theatre group and has performed at the recent Arts program at Trapp Farm Park. Dorothy made a report on the South of the River Soccer group and a Fall Football League with the surrounding communities. She stated that team tennis is also a concept that is being discussed for next year. It appears to be a program with a possible sponsor. The junior tennis team program is reported to have a good response, and will be offered next year. She stated that adult softball grew with a net gain of twenty-five (25) teams, with thirty-seven (37) new teams added. She noted that based on the 5,000 population growth in the City, the number of new teams translated into one new team for every 130 residents. Paula Nowariak reported on the summer playground programs, noting that Walnut Hill Park, in only its second year, had sixty-seven (67) registrations with an average daily attendance of twenty-seven (27). She noted that with the hot weather, that this was a rather high average. There were many other days with over forty (40) children present. The numbers for the entire program continue to remain high - even during the hot days. Paula stated that there were seven returnees of a staff of twenty-six, which helped to lead to a quality program. She stated that the Eaganettes dance program continues to be a popular program for the 115 children registered, with over 300 parents in attendance at the year end recital. Paula explained some of the fall programming anticipated this year, including Star Gazing, Music and More - for small children, Santa Calling and Volleyball for Adults, which has already registered 15 teams. Members of the Advisory Commission thanked Dorothy and Paula for their efforts and congratulated them on the fine recreational programs. OLD USI S 1. Community Center Study - Director of Parks and Recreation, Vraa, noted that the Commission's packet contained a list of components or programs which might be implemented in the Community Center. He said, that this was an initial list which would have to be refined, deleted or added to it at the Commission's desire. He stated this was at least a step in the right direction of refining what a community center could become. Commission member Caponi, questioned why a police pistol range had been added. It was noted that this could be a possibility, assuming that the range could be made public for gun safety programs, etc. There was no action taken on this listing. The Director then reviewed information relative to a community survey, noting that Decision Resources had responded to a number of questions of the Advisory Commission. The Director stated that City staff has also contacted other communities that have used firms to conduct independent research. He stated that two additional firms had indicated a willingness to submit a proposal, which had not yet been received as yet. The Commission questioned who would be responsible for writing the questions for such a survey. The Director responded that the Commission would be involved in the process, but the actual questions themselves would be the responsibility of the consulting firm. After additional discussions and questions by the Advisory Commission, on a motion by Kubik, seconded by Thurston, it was the recommendation of the Advisory Commission that the City Council hire an independent research firm to do a sample survey, regarding citizen interest in a community center and recreation programs in general. All members voted in favor. 4 ATHLETIC FIELD STUDY Director Vraa noted that Landscape Architect/City Planner, Steve Sullivan, had to leave the meeting early, however, he said he would try to provide the background information concerning the athletic field study. He stated that the City Council had requested additional studies be performed on two additional sites, and a third site that Staff had been made aware of. The third site being the southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. The Director then reviewed comparative costs for the Borchart-Ingersoll Site, the north Opus site and the Lexington/Diffley Road site. The Director noted that in terms of like comparisons, the Lexington/County Road site development costs were projected at $337,000.00. In comparison, the previously reviewed southeast parcel was $360,000.00; the Peterson parcel $310,000, the Borchart-Ingersoll $450,000; and the Opus parcel approximately $596,000. The Director cautioned the Commission on these numbers, noting that these are not intended to be actual development costs, but simply a comparison of like unit quantity costs in an effort to rank, sequential, site costs. Mr. Caponi questioned the Lexington /County Road 30 site noting the elevation would not lend itself well to lighted athletic fields. He also expressed concern with surrounding development and how this would be impacted by an athletic location. Other members expressed concern over the proposed development costs for the Opus site, being nearly twice as much as this parcel. Mr. Kubik expressed concern that a number of sites have already been acquired, and there are few alternatives available for the Advisory Commission. There were numerous questions regarding the sites and opportunities for either expansion or relaying out of the number of facilities, possible reductions in costs, and other site enhancements. Commission member Carroll questioned whether staff had looked at the southeast corner of Dodd and Wescott Road. Director of Parks and Recreation responded that the City staff had reviewed it, but did not believe that any formal presentation had been made to the Advisory Commission. After discussion, Director Vraa stated that it was his intent to prepare a report for the Advisory Commission and City Council concerning the various alternatives, and that a joint meeting for review by the City Council would be appropriate. No action was taken by the Advisory Commission. NEW BUSINESS Patrick Eagan Park - by Cheryl Lake. Chairman Martin stated this item could be deferred to the next agenda, due to the time. Commission deferred this discussion to the October, 1987 Commission meeting. AVAILABILITY OF PROPER Director of Parks and Recreation, Ken Vraa, noted that Williams Pipeline apparently was an ownership of three lots within the Westbury 3rd Addition. He stated the Advisory Commission had seen these three lots on their tour, and although there has been no official offer conveyed to the City, apparently the lots may be available at little cost. The question before the Advisory Commission is what value or use did they feel the lots were, and at what cost? Commission member Carroll suggested that the City acquire the lots, noting that they could be used as a vegetable/flower garden, but he did not feel that a tot lot should be considered for proposal, because members had already proposed a tot-lot for the south end of the development. Members questioned if the three lots were used for park purposes, would there be sufficient parking for a playground/flower garden area. Mr. Porter questioned whether the assessments of over $17,000 would have to be paid by the City? 5 After additional discussion, the Advisory Commission referred the issue to the Director of Parks and Recreation; requesting contact with Williams Brothers Pipeline to determine what costs might be involved; and if the residents immediately adjacent to the parcel had any concerns relative to this area being utilized for parks purposes. On a motion by Kubik, seconded by Martin, with all members voting in favor, the item was deferred, pending a staff report. PARKS DEVELOPMENT Director of Parks and Recreation, Vraa, reviewed for the Advisory Commission the information contained within the packet referencing the bond fund update and park status report. He stated that the status of the bond fund itself was healthy and that the projects had generally been within the earlier budget estimates. The fund balance was low in comparison to the number of projects which had not yet been completed and referenced in the original proposal; however, a transfer of funds from the LAWCONlLCMR account had not as yet been made. The Director then reviewed for the Advisory Commission current construction projects, noting that Council has awarded the lighting contract for hockey rink construction. The tennis court contract had also been let, and it is expected that the contractor will complete much of this work by late October. The park shelter buildings are still somewhat behind schedule, but the contractor had increased his work force two weeks ago, and was making up time. Finally, the parks construction contract had encountered significant problems at Thomas Lake Park, due to poor unstable soils. This problem has been resolved by a $22,000 change order for parking lot stabilization. The Director then reviewed the 1988 projects, noting that the list had already expanded beyond the department's capability for completion. Many of these items have to be deferred until the lst of the year, due to the City's current developmental framework, including such parks as: Bridle Ridge, and Woodland Elementary School, which were not contemplated for 1987. He stated that a more complete report would be presented to the Advisory Commission perhaps as early as October. OTHER BUSINESS AND REPORTS There are several items under "Other Business and Reports", including a report on the meeting with Eagan Athletic Association, Representive, Kevin Mitchell, on the concern for more athletic facilities. The Director stated that the Parks Status Report pertaining to facilities, was mailed to Mr. Mitchell. Further, Staff has already initiated a letter to the three School Districts and Athletic Associations in an attempt to coordinate a meeting of facility users and providers. The Director then reviewed the 1988 budget process on current status reviewed by the City Council. The Director stated that the Eagan High School - Northview Park Site Plan has been underway, and the school district envisions the need to construct approximately twelve (12) tennis courts on Northview Athletic fields. There were several comments, questions, and concerns expressed by the Advisory Commission relative to the twelve courts and what benefits might be available to the City, if this were to occur. Director Vraa stated that although this must be approved by the Advisory Commission and City Council, he would be developing a tentative agreement for the site utilization by the City and school district facilities, in case tennis were placed on City property. 6 1. r I It was noted that the annual pioni^. -,)heduled for Friday, September 1 1 , and a commitment should be made no 1e.: :r khan Friday, September 4th. There being no additional items, , py Porter, with all members voting in favor, the r `t 3rd, 1987 was adjourned at 11:30 P.M. Sate Secretary/Treasurer 7 TO: ADVISORY PARKS AND Pl CION CO4 MISSION KEN VRAA, .",TOR OF PARK" R, -)N -3. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 SUBJECT.* COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 1ST, 1987 Following the ca-1 to c „ at 7 a0 Commission will approve ,enda and the = c.' the me(.- 3r', 1987. T' The e are four (4) items under the Consent A a r-)v -1-ig these Gas been -nd the ' in,.Lng _ leluded back of th_ p -t. TTel l r There is si..,Ij item der Development Proposals which iA t Glen _ 3rd Addition. Department staff has met with t e1 Corportion, for discussion regarding parks dedication r s recommending a combination land/cash dedic3 io-- 'c t-` addit4on, the developer is working with S _ to tt park, and to that of the propose r(v' E~d by ' Le Commission last month. In prepz :d '-y - Planner, Sullivan, pertaining to this plat. Old Business The first item under "Old Business" is Cliff rake Caller_ , was deferred from the September Co issio> t` S1 additional information will be 4.1 ible t rv this particular site plan. ission September pack. for reviewal pr' _r to the C for this partie parcel has not been replica.. The seconri pertains to Blackhawk Fake Park and the City's _ financial atance from LAWCON and State. Enclosed in the memorandum ddressed to the City Administrator and City C or Commission's review and approval. Item three, is do-P- ^ .4 frc- th- ---ber on ti-- a proposal by s. C 1 L f rd t r °y f+ Park. This is a to ative propo2 -1 id direr Lc i from ' ®.e Ad, Co is sought. Please review your Sr-t } - packet for a letter -s. Lu' The fourth item pertains to the W--.;bury ® 3rd Addif--ion, and T (3) lots that are currently owned by Williams Brother Pipelinf members will recall that Staff as directed to irate Brother ining to these t ots and their f glans. 1 report vii ''it; converstation wit u _111ams Brothers Pip Distribution will be made at the Commission meeting of City Code not ti which the Advisory Commission members compiled some months ago. Thi been revis , and a copy enclosed for your keeping. New usl- Tte e is a singl under 3sit , y ' ' t Softball. 3 7f repor t Vie 1 c® :`.ties, and t'1_ implicL-` `;age u cc---erns for additional athletic b e :s wit! n the co: ur. 'ty. Develop eat Le -'scape Architect/Park Planner, Stephei on the numerous construction projects now t to say, Department Staff, as well as contractors, up with the ambitious, if not somewhat over zealouo,r for 1987. Also, under Parks Development, there will be an update on tx Park C: structio process. Staff will also be calling fo3 Advi-r -y Commission for expenditures for this park to lw'Y deve'.o-- nt Othe Less and Re o is Thr a several items under "Business and Reports"at this time, which - the Advisory Commission's reviewal and attention. As always,if Commission members are unable to attend the meeting, notice to the department would be appreciated. KVlbls ADVISORY PARKS AND KEG' , - 1, _ t 0:. m "R" ~ )N T'": SEPTEM.SR 29, 1987 L, CONSENT DA - OCTOBER 1, 1987 C%4_- MEETING The follow' - c d e for and recommendation to t'ze City C ancil. 1. Engstroms Deerwood Addition Consists of 83 single family and 22 townhouse units on 39.7, y of Deerwood School Addition. Pee,ommendationg 7 this plat be subject to a cash dedication. A. trail on Pilot Knob Road. A trail connection to Deerwood Elementary School. 2. Dorchester of Eagan CE--- c- 320 apartments. A previous ~ 3r pt the PUD covering the land. Lt buildings, south of County Road #kJ F_ -3ation: That this poi be subject to a cash dedication. That this p" > be subject to a trail on County Road #k30. 3. Cedar Cliff Cc --°cial - 3rd Addition This proposal a revision and ez~ providing for a drug-care center. Recommendation: That this plat be subject to a cap 1- ration i Policy for Co ercial/Industrial Property. 4e Yorkton Industrial Park - 2nd Addition This proposal provides for platting 11.5 acres into five lots; tT of which provides for an office/warehoused Recommendation: That this pl<' be subject to a cash dE Polio for C r-~ial/Industrial property. T : ADVISORY RS_ TI-J CC- . 70N L STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PI DA' SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 U BLACKHA "LEN - 3RD ADDITION BACKL-.JL The proposal requests pre'°ninary plat of 33 lots on 2_`& is a component of an pvit ' n"° planned deN-lopment family residentia'. B' c Ridge sic: '_a family the east. Exi - lot, 'y, lies co -xnity pa 3tS to the soot 4: [ -?QU" C The current proposal provides dedication of two outlots fi "B" located within the southeast corner of the parc€." a - for the continuation of a trail link to the existii lake. The outlot also allows for buffer from thi ' development. A 30" wide pedestrian access from Ast is proposed along the easterly edge of Outlot B. 9 c c with a 20" width obtained with adjacent Black ,k ..id,,- p. o.~. w" pedestrian corridor. developer met with staff and pro.) 1 he on* o _ --kland,) revising for utilization as _m.--' - .'ly 1 ' r=..pion provides one additional lot a__d p -sterly ridgeline. In respect to park redo irkland shoreline, but does n t hinder fac:!l'_ An !c to the Bl ` a'- Park Master Plan, a trail is to it la ..e c... ass via a 1 d,.: at the "narrows". It appears tha' portic ~ of Outlot A i nc cessary for this trail ;Link. In order t ; the trail, the developer agreed to provide a temporary tram the southern portion of the re pective "outlot A". With t ' construction of the trail tie te-porary easement would be va permanent trail easement estab'______'. The proposed pedestria access from Ashbury with a 32" vertical cl L, to the ordinary Lake. Staff has ro xis a :d several alternate', , for . iL_ park and found that th? implementation of a tra3'_ out s` feasible. It appears that a 350" trail l:':k with three is of st coulc' negc '.ate the grade Chang( zec : ally. (Figure #2) -d adjacent to or ease of d the trail ail . . ~e City wool 2r-°J _ ;ion of the tra. ' The develop o provide a ec-_ _ _ -t' on abutting Bla-'.b Attached is _)le of easement. The r t protects existing v =t Lion, s1 t he implementation of man made intrusions. O rn `ISSIO ACTION: F J approval of Bla,'-- Glen 3rd Addition s _ . 1. Acquisition of ®utlot B for parkland dedication and rear 1 led requirement in cash. 2» Developer provides conservation easement along lots a.i Park as determined Equate by City s` Gff. 3» Developer provid . _iry trail of parcel p _ i - ding adequate c nd p' s d(: i ~d adequate by City taff. 4» Developer grade trail and step bed along pedestrian access according to Park & Recreation design and standards. 5» D ".open omit Outlot A for park purposes and u' Fi_ire #k1. SSlbls I 4 1 1 4-f ti 1 ANN- 0 . ~'9:....:.. x' y~ ^M ~ ~ e ~ - e ~ ~ .~a~, - - w ~ . c..-.._. ~t r ~ ~~F r / ` ~F ~-r,~ .ev..,,~,~,~,._ w ~ ~ - ~.r~,~_~~_~~ r ~ ~ may. ^^...e-- xp ~ ~ r,f~ 1 ';s s _ ~ $ 2 ~ ~ r: . i. 4 ®R° - j~+ ® J J 1. CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made this day of 1987, by the undersigned parties, being all the owners in fee and all the encumbrancers of the premises hereinafter described ("Grantors"), and the , a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantors, for good and valuable consideration paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby ix«z:,~:::xcn . c xe..~ ~....r`:'at ac9ST`1t7wleGgeQ', gran l.xx t. the City a pc o:"S,. Un easement, as that term is defined in this instrument, over, under and across the premises described in the attached Exhibit "A" ("Subject Property"). 2. Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, agree that the following are prohibited in perpetuity on the Subject Property. A. constructing, installing, storing or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to ~buildings, structures, fences, walkways, clothes line poles, and playground equipment. B. Parking of recreational vehicles. C. Vegetable gardens. D. Storage of firewood. E. Removal of or damage to any plants planted by the C4 d-cr 1 . 2. The Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns, may establish and maintain a lawn in the conservation easement area, as well as other plant material which is approved in advance in writing by the 3. Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, further grant the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation, to do the following on the Subject Property: A. Preserve, improve and enhance the slope, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat. B. Alter, clear and remove trees or other vegetation. C. Plant trees and shrubs. D. After giving the owner or occupant reasonable notice, enter upon the Subject Property at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. 4. This Easement is supplementary to the platted drainage and utility easement and does not supersede or replacer it. GRANTORS: I SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (H CKHn GLEN 3RD D'DN APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION LOCATIONz SW 1/4 SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGTJ3 FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the H lack't-z a va = Glen 3rd Addition. This proposal is for 33 single family lots on 25.8 acres located on Outlot B of the L. L c .kt'a aw Hills AdditaC>nm That plat was rezoned ~ -i March 1970 and all conditions of that approval. have been met with this proposal. `E`h.,s plat is in conformance w_tt`t the januarti 1.9137 Lend Use Ins-Ap that designates this area D-1 (0--3) units/a ?yea Currently, EXISTING CONDITIONS; 'this site is vacant and consists mostly o grassland with scattered i:tt;!ature scrubs firees ! mature oak stand is o-n t e western edge o fi-hi site and along t," ;iout'_b1wK s,t:: pY (:)p ',rt°y line. Minimal grading is propose in t'C7G-'`se areas. This site is si;rrotzn<;_ea by R-1 plats: HI«c'kHaw.K Hz11;_ to t'`i'ie west, B_f`_ackhawk Glen to the north (some lots undersized), Stoney Point to the northeast (some lots undersized), HlciC_°tC.1c` wk Ridge the east and ~3C:rfia4dk Park on €.'~t, south. Out lot A 11®6i0 f acres.) 4i3I?i Outlot B (1.0 acres) will be dedicated to the City park system. SITE PLAN: One access to this E F from H I_a k.nawk Hit I s Road matching Ashbury Road to the north serves this site and connects to the Diackhawk Ridge Addition to the east. The shared cul-de-sac in eKcess of 500' received a Variance with the earlier proposal. The L.C1t lines from the two plats line up well creating a nice oJes.a1_i_ consistency in the area. park on south as .e£E C_:C~I'1.L1°.C~T~tC?,E to the the been provided jointly with the other plat m All lots exceed 2-1 standards with a minimum °°'_ot area o 17,000 SF, aver.Ig i_ii_g 26,492 SF. The a:Terage width at the setback line 1s 127'. Sienna Corporation will maintain architectural control on al a ones or this single phase development. The z't?:1ITiCer of 'wilders has not been de L r,r€ined yet but the proposed home/i_Cat value will be in the $175,000 rat"ge~ A Homeowners Association will Wl created to maintain aesf fte`s:.ic cC„1.nti_'ol of the area. T"t1e poi1ClTng area in tsbe t` C- n i r< E l portion of the site will be e sealed that ' r: Ci when the water level drops, the Association can add more water br i I cj nig it up to the control level. maki) I i/1)MINA / EROS ',<O CONTROL: The proposed site consists of hilly topography with elevations ranging from a low of 790 a Blac;kha,wk Lake to a high point of approx muately 870 along the westerly side. The site grading iJ~lc1.;_I<al the es extension of ~ ta`ahbLl br Read from Blackhawk Hills Road. The proposed street grades meet City of Eagan requirements thereby not eXceeding the maximum allowable 8% grading drainage grade. The site provides for c< basin asi?`] located in he center of the development. appears this basin is intended to be a wet pond with a proposed normal water elevation of 821. a ,,-,d a pond bottom of approximately 81 6® The high water level is proposed to be 824 resulting in a st ora e volume of approximately 6.2 ciC:'/I'. Drainage within this site will be directed to this centrally located ponding area. This will require the catch basins proposed at the low point of Astibur y Road adjacent to Blackhawk Lake be connected to the inlet pipe to the pond as opposed to the outlet pipe from the pond. The development is proposing to provide an emergency overflow from the low point in Ashbu y Road to sC.he proposed L3oT?ding area The aprtroxl mate total dra1nagre~. to t~~hi~a Pc~d is 64- s 64' acres a c~ _ requirin,g a. r, o u t f 1 o of B-10 cfs based on, the proposed storage "volume of 6.2 ac/f f t m The outlet pipe for the pond, ca be a submerged outlet due to the depth of the pond. The submerged outlet will provide skimming thereby allowing debris, e1._c4, to remain in i~:L" to discharging the pond pr .to B~...~'<.LY-;..~.<<7.~°k ~_~i3.7{e~. Slopes adjacent to the 4ond shall be constructed at a slope not to exceed he 4-.1 criteria. The ot..-tt_ lF u }3 i p3' from the pond to Blackh-awk Lake will req-ur re a permit froiii the Department of Natural Resources. An existing 18" storm seofeL will _ discharge into Lh(-- pond at its northerly end. The far end elevation, sha . l be constructed to be consistent with the normal water level of the proposed ponding area. Additional catch basins will be required at the southwest corner of Ashbury Road and Bi<<ckhaE^!k. Hills Road cont-lecting to the existing storm ;ewer in Blackhawk Hills Road. °J'-`.he development shall be responsible for comp-"Iying to the rec omitend tTi:'?il s a ;;ade by t. io Dakota Co-unt y Soil & Water Conservation District. The recommendations from the Tlantrita Count.' Soil- & eater Conservation District are attached as part, of the conditions of the staf 4 report. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve this devel-copme-i-it will. be provided from the existing trunk setter in B?aC".'aT1a k Hills Road along the easterly side of this development. The existing trunk sewer as adequate capacity to serve this development. The lots abutting the existing trunk along the east side of the site ca be serviced by the existing trunk sewer. The development will be responsible for taawiust.ii g the existing manholes to match the proposed grades. Water service will be provided by the lateral water mains T constructed from the existing 8" main in B.1 c3 t. kC`z a `u1 C Hills Road. The ' ' development will be tre siJ;^3,°1sible for extending canAl connecting the lateral attain in the easterly north 1 south cul-de-sac ctxr~ ~,pE?t abutting the proposed Blackhawk Ridge Addition to the existing 8" water main in Blac:khawk Hills Road. House elevations below elevation 860 will require zTlclivzdi_zal pressure reducing val:je sa. STREETS /ACCESS /C1 RCULAT ION: This site will be served by Ashbury nad connecting to Bi_ackhawk Hills Road and the adjacent Blackhawk e k7 ; development to the east. rt5hCk rights-of-way are all proposed o y.` s ~yu i. n.~ y; ~ requiring .3 wide paved streets. responsible for providing all ea5`r,'-;ilE_nt required for surface drainage, a'~E', storm :,td"lt_?", sci:~zi'~a:t~`y s~'~~E~ and d water main systems and the park dedication La:-keA c e _ _ j~tEent. shall be- provided for he centrally located pond and BL ;.c:°'k aK'rw Lake to their high water levels. Adequate right-of-way for B1_ackiiaa^k Hills Wad was previously fled3 f'`:3°_::.'.C~ with Bla K~1c3`s^ik GT_l_e Is Adda.t bona Al regulatory agency permits be acquired ~ shall in a timely manner as required by the affected agency, ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed. o :inl tar'ir sewer i.T"unke water area, `sanitary water .~c1t. f-?rcil benefit, >.s.',ter lateral benefit and storm sewer trunk. Sian pr(_apoc 3ed development 1s subject to the ol.lc:)wing pending assessments: V DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 372 Street/Residential $23,4 1ff 505 ff $14,922 Equivalent 372 Storm Sewer Lateral 9.24%f":f 506 ff 4,675 TOT PENDING ASSESSMENTS $19,597 _h proposed site is sub4ei % to the following ~ _ tL. ~ proposed assessments s a condition of final plat approval. PRW DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNI 88 Lateral Benefit $15.06/ cf 00 Ef. $ 7,530 from Sanitary Sewer Ail final assessment will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat of approval. CONDITION : BL CKHAWK GLEN RD ADDITION . All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A ....-pyF1 of the Homeowners Association shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. 3s There shall be no driveway access into Blackhawk Hills Road 4. Lots _z, 1, 3 and 4€ dock 1, shall have their driveways connect to the internal street, not S3 1_ aC" ;%'tI t'a wk Pt m i s The development shall be responsible for completing the water- main loop from the easterly a. ;Ct?ntr c1_ Ce-waa_', ;^tSPel`~ to the existing water main in Bl a khawk Hills Road, 6. 'I' h s development shall ~ e respon : iJo1 e for ti9 r. o v z c. ing adequate e:=i.sE',iTF.:T1ts for the storm sewer outlet into Blacki-,awk Lake. This development shall also b responsible or fv`tJnss6tructi g the required outlet into Black hawk Lake. ST59DARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments l~ This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Riqhts-of-W l~ This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way.. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition Costs Of additional drainage, e"7ntz"ing, and utility easements as required by the alignment depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development.. ® This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and teilipCeara .`mope es"3d-ie4tents for ultimate development of ad]acent roadway* as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency, V This development whal l dedicate adequate drainage and ponds g easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage plume requi.rements® C. Plans and Specifications l l public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City cedes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2W detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval a This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a caul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The fi.narncial guarantee shall be nice l sided in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. WPM STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAC TO 5s Al internal public anti private streets ...hall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public imorbvements 1m if any public improvements are to be installed udder a City contract, the appropriate project dust be approved by Council action prior to final plat" approval. Permits 1. This developments shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in, the time frame required by the affected agency, F. Parks Dedication E This development shall fulful l its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. Other l® Al? standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance bl Council action. F Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: ~E,cTist 1-987 September 15, l! Revised, STANDARD LTS 4 2 M LK KMG .l r a Oc¢ oo m" 1 , .Ja 1 !mss 40NTENEY ppaa o KY11.0 ,G' 4 ry ~q LA. L•i:J ENGtE _i N K s _p @~ NLtS R0~ C .H y fCO s x ®1_ :R C,a<AaE _ w r° ITE vEN L~a , V GR Tlt AYE arEU AvE. ~ cc"K rro v r TR FR t t I Z C_ G P' f ION i ZONING rc _ ®a' D-11 r BLA LAN U MA D 11 1 b X11 D~1 + f rE .5 ,lb c 1 aJ ~4 s• ~ t L~1N - ~ .,Ian ro ~o r C- i r gyal 1 v O~ ~ + `t t. ~ N ` A n j+ , I I 1 I r 1 a 8> aeMhwase. ReoGF ® it E RR 2 `1 9 r v, (~a ~/^v ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ Q ~ a ?'fig :~t: c C v a h vv v u ➢ ~c' ~ 1° UE ~,7 {!i ~ r 0 o p 8 x• I o "Ilin ap ®LACKHAWK GLEN 3R® ADDITION _ James R. Hill, inc. # u o' s PRELI EAGaw, MN, MINARY PLAT ' PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION 191E vM.q o'. 1V19E A.. NINNf 4a0~19,NN, 414if h981.~. env P2GK)KMICLDT AVE$-BLO4WTN. M!5431 16Q 60430,9 r 1 . o ° r P cb r Qc v 4 QL Da 6 P w s ~ E . tl ` 5 ~ deb to 0 b ry W~ _ o c ~ m. P e 0 ftip S ~r I ~ i t i ~~agT ~ ,r w ~ 1. U a F Q i \r 0 @ Q N~ .'~'r3~ III N 0Q i f -rile 6 BLACKHAWK QLEN 3RU ADDITION ' o e o n xl teaam, uN r . t + R, Hill i c. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 2 i~ a R ° rn■ _ANN R I k r t r JE . f / tJRV GvC~.~ SIENNA COF r`ORATION 3 tIt [,ti , t [ t E'`~~ t 1 t i y# » ri iI$# •»5 x~: »a s t!` [ } Ir t. a` [t( [rF 24ii'[ E; le= axs s;; t F. 1 r r Iri 3 t ~ i 1 5„ { jl i i1 ~a I i t,' r v I t ~ r l 9 FI # i i xr t I~Ni! I co Eb .oil P ) ° ` Ali p v i , F" V d 7 PO00 0 0 dPOdt dd - # m c~ yr 9 ,YJ - ~t t' M r• v ~ V V(pe P taY 'c y r t " Sig- [®9 K / M I U O V V N } aA f uV t o ® SLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITION t>a®ee, ra, x o' * PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN a James ( IIll, inc. SIENNA CORPORATION PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS Ott 40.0 rorl>® a P. wU1I r ee® lor,M>_ Ix,Mr ..•..:*^°w !®•m&£.3.%.000.bkG'ttgo. Md 9g431 ,grj-p94.9029 • • • " PG m / /j Qt ♦ "Q 011 8 .41 6 ~r°o U ~f I i / r 1! as it i v 'C - b r ! 2, CL k ca v 1 n 1.® C_ . d _ c - ® -T E 0 0 n ~ D r r a' All E uU t 11"N 5, W. L h - p P ti' L`v~s pp a gg 47 x ~i-s, S At- +C- Z- I aLacKHAwK GLEN 3RD aooiTloN cCT1E'S R. NIll 111C♦ A x es~4r, w». ~a PRELIMINARY PLAT o .4" ~ PLANNERS t ENGINEERS l SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION r"o on s «wc..o~ia,WM. asaf® -•,.{nx 8z ~kMOLDT AA S. BLOWINGTON W 95431. SQ-804.5024 j 4l FIL T Kt i r.-~ ,VII - r . CENTE ~ OA, "TA. KEN T~ENOF ADDiT{p{ e 5tI C3`"k 1C 36 F'1'FT- t , A CITY 4.,. .a 53 r BLACKHAWK C- H- I PARK t4- t i _ _ to i i . } 15 F5", 27 t - - Cdr f 'n~► ` 27I I D-I-L 7 r t III C-K } BLACKHAWK GLEN r SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. Icity of a an SANITARY standard approved: plate 4p: { r= PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN ` DE PARTMEN T : ADVISORY Pi TIC-4 Cr' KEN VRAA, 'TOR OF DOROTHY : alai, REC'nr ki _ _ ..,rtv SUI a v 1 o,)a DATE: SEP` 1, 14, 15! ",--CT: SURVEY or ! ,T SOF°TRALL ROGRAM,S/EACILITIE«S Pert ally, the Department of Parks & Recreation si_v t' the OT-sli -rea in order to provide a mpari,m >n p nd f acilities ® Cities surve;, E - le s ,,on of information i.e., other grow,- --ai th has stabilized, cities whose p, " o_ 's; cities whose previous rapid gr, .h treat ' current population. ~S Due to the rapid growth of Eagan's adult softball progr . , (37) new teams in 1987; growth from sixty-two (62) ed thirty-five (135) in 1987, couples i-A, c id from residents and corporations fog t 1th the opportunity to play; it is e -r _ s current and projected field space in order t e ;o unity now and in the future. .A e cities surveyed were: Plymouth, Eden P , Brooklyn Park, Fr "looming+^n, and Std Louis Park. The i on requested included: arrenf a c for adu"_'_ softball league play, of 1 nights of league play, weekend 7 z number of industrial teams, wheth, .ei~__Mc_:lo d league play, whether school facilit*=s are used id wheth( t'- plans to construct additional softball facilities. TOTAL TOTAL NEIGHBORH® TOTAL TOTAL COMMUNITY POPULATION FENCED FENCED PARK PRIVATE SCHOOL DAYS # # ADDT'L FIELDS LIGHTED FIELDS FACIL. TEAMS INDIV FIELDS FIELDS USED TEAMS Plymouth 45,000 6 6 2 0 0 M-F 186 96 2-4 Eden Prairie 31,000 8 2 6 0 0 S-F 222 82 4-6 Brooklyn Park 50,000 7 2 0 O 0 M-F 98 0 Unavail Fridley 60,000 5 5 1 0 0 S-TH 103 29 No Eagan 40,000 8 4 0 0 0 M-F 135 26 3 Bloomington 85,000 22 10 0 9 0 M-F 647 400 No St. Louis Park 42,900 7 4 1 0 0 M-F 205 30 No Items of interest regarding programs: No community surveyed offers league play during morning or afternoon hours. Eden Prairie allows no outside players. Next year each team will pay a $100.00 eligibility fee per team. If illegal players are found the $100.00 is forfeited. Brooklyn Park hires a contractual league director; the individual is currently a member of the golf course grounds crew. Fridley schedules all rain make up games on Fridays. An attempt to identify the standards used to plan for the number of fields required in a community, was not successful. The individuals contacted were not part of the planning process. None of the communities surveyed use public school facilities for adult league play. Municipalities such as Plymouth and Bloomington encourage use of their facilities for week-end tournaments. In Bloomington, a tournament is held every week-end from early May through Labor Day. Plymouth fields host tournaments on 75% of those same week-ends. All of Plymouth fields have irrigation. Eden Prairie, on the other hand, allows no "outside" week-end tournaments. Only youth and league events are held. The industrial base of teams in Bloomington and Plymouth should be noted. Elsewhere, the numbers of industrial teams are less of a factor, particularly in Brooklyn Park where there are no industrial teams. 2 F MIL1 1 w Bloomington yields owned by Normandale Cola- _ad Control Cor-oration t- s a~ at the City's twenty-taco (22) softball -lalds. : -°-h has two "playfield" areas which will be develof I L 1990 0: It primary need is for soccer fields. The P - 4 Y' l -ball of be developed. No addit'nal softba' } Prairie is searching fc for a _ a - t L ° alds a Brooklyn Park will concentrate on a soccer complex barb r ni- "11' „t-. the need for more softball fields. Their current field t for their needs. Fridley's softball program has stabili an matures. No "outside" players have been allowed f Current field _ fn F Ldley allows for growth in . should the d-. ad r A_ Questions for discaa n® Program p ilosophy/facilities. 1. What are the long tern effects on facilities p1, _a when program philosophy such as Eden Prairie's and P y'- is ac, Pm Ar "open" program concept, which '-lows p1 , such as adopted by Bloo - en growth innumbers of t m grs, a. Additionally, funding f does a program become too big? Should timed to "control" program growth? 3® WY'., -h should take precedence in facility development; for .r is or a well designed master plan with it's d fin( i ? ac ington's softball _ c ntinues to grow, < C__ t, t is wring City. Prairie, like D n, is growing rapidly. It's industrial , like 'l outh, larger : caber and larger in proportion to it's tc ' >f teams in comparison 1) Eagan. This woti'-I lead one to -)nclud_ _ Eagan'- nd so will iumber of t in th ication. - It is ' d 'o and why both I r ' lyn Park and Fridley few number c__ teams i,. co~.,;arison to th 'r population. Whi' is a maturing City, it dOE not account for the number of teams S Ls with its population, particularly when St. Louis Park is _ as an "older community". 3 i f f Eagan has one team for every two hundred ninety-six (296) ington has one for every one hundred thirty-one (131), Eden Pry one for every one hundred-forty (140); Plymouth one for every two thirty-o-- (231). If -ou only at BI - one or- '--at the r y -__s ~'~elds - pe- ___wny t,:,-- t,_ On tha °c klyn Parr now has n _ Unfort ately, - z't have a `-1 future and what it will hold for the City. We can only hav estimate of what is needed. St believes that, .-i fields already planned at North_i - the City w;.1" 11 nine additional fields. This is ss than previ a lesser number of fields than the facility s'i (2,000 - 1 field). In t' , e stil, i ore fie?' "t be short liv- t__ j :s older a:a -,I_.e fenced as today'- ol,. ® _nd drop ou` s t expected to happe. o a z b of y ars however. i r, building all the fields the citizens may ne now may resu7 cg as the City population matures and teams bi'.ize a'; park growth. Therefore, the City shou? -a , t - _ softball fields at this lower level i aff b-l' 1 and fifteen. Vrnt T1° iul-d be recogniz-1 the oC~ g, - y an equal prod ion , _ li, i unl' kited fields. --'TIONALE FOR FIELD umber of fields needed for the f_iture f theless, staff has made an e e rya - me team for every 29U people. _,_n h_s nL_ _.-I over the last two years as t in- EA ;-?d at a rat_ faster than population growth. this will level out at 1 team per 225 population, wha "high-end" of the range, particularly if you notice thar, r,, z 1 team for 131 people! Assuming 1 tea per 225 people, fields a accom:;,late ,ation of 43,200. a accrue '^`-e 10,(,v0 wore for a total popul~__ c" 5), a 80,OC_`, could '-ave 355 teams, and regxii 22 _ oa curre,' ly have today. Clearly, this is a cc iservative numb( Staff believes that the actual number of fields (or field equ') ) will be closer to 15 new fields. Therefore, staff is recommending V t a futur( `.ac s: fields, which can be lighted, pro he equival ; of E 4 Combined with the three proposed facili ri r t total to ele v new fields. If it beoom4 to lc for addition teams; lighting Field provide fo It c'_ar that additional softball fields will be requ' a minimum of 4 new fields - with lights will be required. KV/ 5 MEMORANIDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1987 SUBJECT: FISCAL188 BLACKHAWK PARK LAWCONISTATE GRANT The Department's preliminary application for a development grant for Blackhawk Lake Park has receieved preliminary approval for grant funding. On Tuesday, September 15, Superintendent of Parks, VonDeLinde, and Director of Parks & Recreation, Vraa, attended a grant workshop sponsored by the Minnnasota Department of Trade & Economic Development which outlines the .inal application procedure for the Fiscal 188 Grants. The final grant application must be received by the State of Minnesota by October 30th, 1987. Eagan's application for Blackhawk Lake Park was ranked 3rd over all, qualifying it for funding. Unfortunately, continued cutbacks in the State and Federal Government may impact the amount of money the City may receive. A "best guess estimate" is that the City will receive approximately $25,000 from the State, and $151,000 from the LAWCONILCMR. The application that was submitted by this department, estimated parks development at $606,000. At the time of application, department staff was anticipating financial assistance amounting to approximately $400,000. The City's share being at $206,000. As you can see, there is a significant difference between what was hoped for and what might actually be available. Congress will be taking up the funding debate for LAWCON shortly. Consequently, the exact determination of the amount of LAWCON funds to be allocated to the state and local grant participants, will not, be known for some time. Therefore, the amount that the City will receive fi-c-11 LAWCON is subject to change. It may be higher or lower than the $151,000 figure previously indicated. STAFF CONCERNS Obviously, the department staff is concerned about funding level Also, of concern is the fact that when the original park plan was prep ~d for the preliminary grant application, staff's original estimate of cost in excess of $800,000. This figure was subsequently pared down to $606,000, ."n order to make the project more acceptable to the Grants Program. Another concern of staff is that if $606,000 is the total construction program cost, and only $176,000 comes from grants aid, the local share will escalate from an anticipated $200,000 to nearly $430,000. Staff has a concern regarding the source of an additional $230,000 expenditure. RECOMMENDATION Despite the above listed concerns, as well as other issues, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the department to file a final application for Blackhawk Park with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development for LAWCON/LCMR funds. Attached to this memorandum is the appropriate resolution authorizing this application. The rationale for this recommendation is based on the fact that although the funding level is less than expected, $171,000 is still a significant amount of money which the City can obviously use for the development of this park system. Further, it may be possible to amend the grant, to delete some items that won't affect the grant application, thus reducing the City share. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To approve the resolution authorizing staff to submit to the Minnesota of Trade and Economic Development a final application for Fiscal 1988 for Blackhawk Lake Community Park. KV/bls RESOLUTION OF T14E CITY OF EAGAN BLACK WK LA COMMUNITY PARK REQUIRED FORM OF SOLUTION OF APPLICANT AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION D EXECUTION OF GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP OPEN SPACE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT D E STATE BOND FUND. WHEREAS, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Bonded Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local governments in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan desires to develop certain land own as Blackhawk Lake Community Park, which land is to be held and used for permanent open space; and WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be.eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation Plan and five-year action program (capital improvement); and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the cost of developing said interest(s) shall be $606,300; and WHEREAS, upon project approval, the City of Eagan must enter into formal ant project agreements with the State for -the specific purpose of developing Blackhawk Lake Community Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GAN: 1. That application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section:, for a grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund of 1965, as amended, for amount presently estimated to be $150,632.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of cost from other funds available to it. 2. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section, for a grant from the Bonded Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 400, Section 8, subdivision 2(a) for an amount presently estimated at $25,144 and the applicant will pay the balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 3. That the Mayor o the City Council and the City Administrator are directed to execute and file: a) such application and the 5-year action program with the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section and to provide additional information and furnish such documents as may be required by said Department; and b) to act as the authorized correspondents of the applicant. CODE 11 4. That the proposed development is in accordance with plans for the allocation of land for open space uses and that should said graiv be made, the applicant will develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said application and aproved by the National Park Service and the Department of Trade and Economic Development. . That the United States of erica and the State of Minnesota be and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the regulations of the Department of Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504; Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity. . That the City of Eagan enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section, to provide such grants as are specified in numbered paragraphs 1 and 2, above, for the years 1988 - 1990. 7. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute such agreement and any supplemental agreements thereof. CITY O EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Gene V Overbeke, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Eagan at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1987, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possesion. Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan CODE 11 BOND FUND UPDATE BY PARK SITE SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 1984 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL GENERAL 550 26,183 29,484 64,130 20,313 1li~,110 GOAT HILL 551 4,164 250,355 192,891 17,320 ,730 RAHN 552 102,620 147,895 165,114 16,060 4;1,689 NORTHVIEW 553 125,153 21,846 65,151 39,811 251,961 TRAPP FARM 554 8,803 206,015 203,078 22,754 440,650 TRAILS 555 0 BLUE CROSS 556 1,806 126,210 36,454 164,470 BURR OAK 557 8,151 257 8,408 CARLSON LAKE 558 47 47 CARNELIAN 559 61 24,354 24,415 QUARRY 560 3,563 114 92,723 20,350 116,750 CEDAR POND 561 12 269 281 COUNTRY HOME 562 1,515 8,665 36 10,216 CINNAMON 563 10,296 32 2,058 1,202 13,588 O'LEARY 564 123 210 21,067 7,040 28,440 EVERGREEN 565 10,681 8,460 1,931 21,072 FISH LAKE 566 46,380 1,511 8,660 56,551 HIGHVIEW 567 8,300 31029 11,329 HEINE POND 568 18 18 LAKESIDE 569 304 7,550 7,854 LEXINGTON 570 6,561 1,971 8,532 MEADOWLAND 571 7,595 106 92,387 13,830 113,918 OAK CHASE 572 8,050 10,104 900 19,054 PERIODT 573 8,950 401 20,720 30,071 PILOT KNOB 574 2,520 123 40,583 2,116 45,342 RIDGECLIFF 575 15,457 45,215 16,996 2,059 79,727 RIVER HILLS 576 6,500 2,358 21 8,879 SOUTH OAKS 577 4,789 46,841 1,464 53,094 WALDEN 578 36 36 WESCOTT STATION 579 0 WOODHAVEN 580 8,050 2,330 12,951 2,150 25,481 WIKLER 581 17 17 ACQUISTION 582 463 1,908 433,186 5,111 440,668 WALNUT HILL 583 4,742 115,853 17,203 8,326 146,124 THOMAS LAKE 584 239 6,322 6,561 OTHER 6,477 6,477 TOTAL 370,306 918,024 1,615,655 272,575 3,176,560 T : PARKS RECRRATION ADVI_JR I3SION DOROTHY _ Er _.L ATION t : l c SEPTEMBER L9, 190 INFORMATION IT i,_T/PROBL,EP" II L~ S_ 4. r . YOUTH ATRL IC ASSOCIA` I( , SCHOC' D7-1RICTS t EDUCATION PERSONNEL, of participants in youth athleti_ for several years. In 1987, however, new r a off 9 assoc' tions in addition to growth in established .port programs, in- -1 the c . nor field sp- -e. Three thletic as of tions: Athletic Association and Rc , Area At'-' kss, in Eagan. istorcal'y, the thrE Latior the thr '-tool districts. This p: 3tice is le e . Mr. Kevin Mitchell, an EAA board member and res' _ nt of ' District #196 ~t%E idance area, wrote to the Direct( Parks , indicating c arding insufficient field :e, a" lc 1 w and questions r ng the availability of npT-1 Y ;i1-1 Parrs and Recreation Advisory C fission C , Parks and Recreation, Vraa c' ,d Aitchell m( to di in the letter. Department staff have recognized a growing need to oe X three athletic associet"ons, and community education p timely that the depa h- " `acilitate such a meet invited those closely _ vole i w` Fh® o---- `-ation c Providers of Facilitie. 'D tt t ing c> 23rd c 1 On Sex 2 1 > T, °i ' - #191, 1'' I,- I P d - «U Bath--- ii,__^c:,oration. :t ----.d tiv The athletic ation's recc the City, fa U4 3 in exiQi-= or of - a. ' bil a 'c new plr _ m C r 1(. space and oi;_' or fac - Facility allocation systems were next identifm 1. The from School District #191's "locked room meet` -Q9 and ti- the City's classification of facilities, r - for interest in the appropriate age group being wined facility. In all cas 3, historical uz as been an a'1 The Athletic As r. ion's then heir ' ion. .Astounding participa ' numbers were s~. , data such _ 17--, 2,050 family memb--- s, 35% of which are Fagan residents, 30% o- 27% Apple Valley. EAA has 41% of its participants from School District #191, 44~ --om #197. ' p )87 was 12% 1 L, 17% 11. Projected i in 19e _ s_- -3 growth i It J9 are: ,t ill 35% and 2b$; Soccer 457, -1 a , and 45%. (Travel pru6i- s were not set apart from "in livuov" PI-V6 RAAA pr_, r,owth in 1987 was 25% in baseball, 17% in travel in soccer, 8% in travel soccer, 10,_ in softb 'L and 2"C in fc st 1 softball e Projected ®owth it 1 " , 3 i basebm 11; 10% in soc-, , .5% in 1 -1. travel -ball. (Be,, ' 11 inf : 3 t pro ) . In terms of facility allocations, FAA baseball facilities 50% City of Eagan; basketball facilities have been 100,. 1 1, fracilities have been 20% 191, 80% City of Eagan; softball 1 1, 20% City of Eagan. ftA "icilities at 195 schools and Cit r t eball used Goat fill and idgeclify. 1 it 1' Park. '-c LL z That 1. Overlap ~,f sport season. among associations facility overlays. 2® Ar the historical a~ 2 3 of facility allocation valid in C ----ity such as Eaec ? 3. Should the Athletic assoc a , or continue current practic 4. Scheduling age groups of children/adults to appropriately sized facilities. The ' igle z t enc c raging outcome of t" Ln fu--t' d2-- -_on e --'r all groups at t ~ th the Eagan Athlet m..._ _ As tionso , acceptance of u .a was accepted. How to proceed: New athletic assn - -on on board r b- - ad b A.A on October 6, 1957® - lections t_. A committee + mpris d The pre: x and 1 from the t°" !ti t ".ons, a c *'y E I Parks and E. U- T. will met,'6 ',lc,wir , The committee will prioritize, i.e®, set th( I f group meeting; to be held later in October. Parks and Recreation staff welcom 1. dialogue, to create new alli; interest of Eagan youth. DPdbls MEMO TO: EAG ADVISORY PARKS D CREATION COMMISSION FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARK DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF SUMMER MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES This report is intended to summarize maintenance and development activities of the Parks Maintenance and Forestry Divisions during the summer of 1987. The following list highlights some of the more notable activities and is not intended to be totally inclusive. Any additional questions or comments about specific programs or projects may be directed to Superintendent of Parks, John VonDeLinde. The report summarizes activities in four areas including personal services, development activities, maintenance activities, and an overview of fall work programs. PERSONAL SERVICES 1. Seasonal Maintenance Staffing At the peak of summer operations, 14 temporary positions were operating in the area of Park Maintenance and Forestry. These positions included: Gang Mower Operator (1) Mowing Route Operators (6) Ball Field Maintenance (1) General Laborers (2) Weed Inspector/Compost Monitor (1) Park Attendants, Trapp Farm (2) Forestry Aide (1) Six of the eight seasonal employees from 1986 returned for work with the department. The majority of the work assigned to these .seasonal employees related to routine parks maintenance, preparations for event.-3, and public service. Again this year, emphasis was put on empio orientation and training including Service Effectiveness training, equipment maintenance, and review of seasonal employment manuals. . Twin Cities Tree Trust The management of the summer youth program was again under the auspices of the Twin Cities Tree Trust organization. Participating cities in Dakota County contributed $2000 towards supervisory services. Approximately 2400 man hours were made available to the City under this federally funded employment program, sponsored by Dakota County. Work of the Twin Cities Tree Trust crews concentrated on completion of the tie wall/bank stabilization project at Cedar Pond Park. 3. Summer Youth Restitution Program For the second consecutive year the P and Recreation De part m r;t w -u, the primary benefactor of the Dakota County Summer Youth T3e.5titu 'ion Pro~,rzit. This program is managed by the County Department of Court Servictt o Which provides youth restitution services for community related proj:c}1,. irl County provided full supervision of the program and approximately 2800 m<an, AGAN ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 2. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 hours for parks development and maintenance. The City's ob ig aticn included provision of materials, manpower assistance, and program coordination. Projects completed by youth during the ten week program included: *Mulching of all trees in the park system - over 1300 *Cleanup and brushing of all trails in Patrick Eagan and Blackhawk Parks *Scraping and painting of Deerwood House in Patrick Eagan Park *Painting of vertical perimeter around Cedar Pond playground *Painting of all existing full-size soccer goals (7 sets) *Painting of nine new soccer goal sets *Construction of a beach perimeter at Trapp Farm Park *Painting of all existing hockey nets - 20 total -Painting of playground retaining wall at Burr Oaks Park *Installation of perimeter around the new play structure at Pilot Knob School *Staining of hockey rinks at Blue Cross/Blue Shield Park On September 15, Director Vraa and Superintendent VonDeLinde made a presentation of plaques to the Dakota County Board and Court Services Department, in recognition of their continuing services. 4. Adult Restitution Program During the months of June, July and August a total of 343 hours of Adult Restitution Services were made available to the department. Work accomp_Cshed by these court referred "volunteers" included painting of new soccf_; Is, painting of hockey rinks, installation of irrigation equipment, an- 6.nu:al assistance to maintenance staff. 5. Volunteers Five Eagle Scout youth volunteered their services to the department. Activities of these youth included staining of hockey rinks at Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks, development of new trail signage along the Highline Trail, construction of a planter box at Cedar Pond Park, and construction of storage boxes for the Summer-in-the-Parks playground series. 6. Full-time Maintenance Staff Emphasis continued to be placed on training and integration of employee.3 in goal setting. Periodic staff meetings were held to discuss develoniTlent activities, budget priorities and project planning. Employee uraining was completed in the areas of Service Effectiveness, Recreation Pro_gr ;i uing, Park System Planning, and CPR training. Jim McGuffee, Dan Curtin and Steve Taylor completed a Turf Maintenance short course at the University of Minnesota. Jim McGuffee also completed a course on employee supervision. Tom Schuster is currently enrolled in a first line supervision course at Dakota County AVTI. Park Maintenance worker Gary Skogstad was injured in early July during a ball- game at Northview Park and was on short-term disability until August 24.. A seasonal employee was hired during Gary's absence to maintain Ptd,_~qua e staffing levels. EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 3. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 7. Park Ranger Explorers Program This program has proven to be extremely viable and beneficial to the Paris, t,m Recreation System. Approximately 15 high school and college air.. youth ar,;> continuing their active involvement with the Explorer Progri~ia4 they h:_ivw volunteered many hundreds of hours to the Parks Patrol Program, r,v,' Uiting in a lower incidence of vandalism and an enhanced program for public rel ations and public service. Periodic training and meetings with the Paris Explorers continues. Commendation and recognition of these fine youth volunteer services must continue to be a high priority, in an effort to maintain the integrity and strength of this program. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 1. Soccer Goals Parks Maintenance staff completed construction of six sets of full-size regulation soccer goals and five sets of "mini" soccer goals. 2. Infield Benches New player's benches were installed on the infields at Couat-cy Home, Highview, Woodhaven, "Old" Rahn, and Evergreen Parks. . Pilot Knob Playground Additions were de to the new Pilot Knob playstructure through funding from the Independent School District. Summer youth completed construction of the playground perimeter and base materials. 4. Hockey Rinks Scott Eppen and Don Buecksler completed construction of two hockey rinks at Blue Cross/Blue Shield Park and one hockey rink at Carnelian Park. Summer youth painted and stained the Blue Cross/Blue Shield rinks, and will complete the Carnelian rink this fall. 5. Concrete Pads Concrete Pads for the decorative waste containers were constructed t the following locations: Cedar Pond (2), Rahn (5), Ridgecliff (2), F,ver,~ een (1), Oak Chase (1), Goat Hill Walnut Hill (2), Trapp Farm (1), South Oaks (1). The new pads will provide a more stable and attractive base for the containers and reduce the potential for vandalism. 6. Site Preparation Parks Maintenance staff completed site grading and sodding activities at Athletic Fields, Goat Hill Park and Trapp Farm Park. EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 4. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 7. Irrigation Installation Staff completed the installation of mechanical, piping and jrL, tion components at Goat Hill Park. Arrangements are currently und~rrway CQr the final wiring and programming of the system controller. Irrigation will now take place through the fall months at this location. Staff have also begun installation of equipment at Northview Park. This project will be completed by mid-November. 8. Athletic Field Preparations Staff assembled and installed new player's benches at Goat Hill and 1R 1 Athletic Fields. New bleachers were assembled for Rahn Park and a nQw 1.3 cage and batting tunnel were constructed for Goat Hill. Other prepar:__ttions were made such as foul line markers and field distance markers. 9. Signage New "handicapped" parking signs were installed in all existing pa:::. i ' Ls and other miscellaneous boundary and general signage was completed. 10. Pre-construction Preparations Removal of backstops, playground equipment and buildings were made at Lakeside and Carnelian Parks in advance of construction under project 87-1. 11. Parking Lots Striping of new parking lots was made at Meadowlands Blue Cross/Blue Shield parks. Quarry, Pilot Knob and 12. Forestry Developments Forestry staff constructed a new planter box around the Rahn Shelter Building on Sandstone Drive. New foundation plantings were made to the Deerwood House in Patrick Eagan Park. Assistance was provided to volunteers construQUng the planter box at Cedar Pond Park. General overstory and ornamental tree plantings were de at the following parks; Carlson'Lake (15) Oak Chase (6) Cinammon Ridge (12) Periodot Path (12) Country Home (6) Forestry staff have also been busy moving nursery stock into parks uti.li r, in, the Vermeer tree spade. Plantings will be made at Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Oa Chase, Goat Hill, Northview and other park sites. EAGA ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 5. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 Maintenance Activities 1. Tennis Court Maintenance Improvements were made to three existing hard courts under izr,,r°~ t t. tai contract 87-2 including overlay and colorcoat of Evergreen hard:„ , coat of River Hills hard court and color coat of Rahn tennis a;:.' Reinstallation of backboards and some fencing was also made t-ider th's contract. 2. Highline Trail Sealcoatin A contract was awarded to Bituminous Roadways, Inc, for sealcoating of the Highline Trail between Pilot Knob Road and Rahn Park. Specifications for Uiie work were written based on research of methodologies used in otl<<vr communities. Eagan's approach was similar to that used by the Hennepin Covnl-.y and Minneapolis Parks systems, consisting of a double sealcoat of asphilt emulsion and sand. It is anticipated that this new sealcoat will last approximately four to five years and greatly extend the life of the trail. The total cost of the project including line striping was approximately $7300. 3. Storm Damage Cleanup A significant commitment of force account manpower, materials and ,quipnv(~nt was directed to the cleanup of park and recreation facilities fol ovaii,4 tilde storm of July 23rd. Cleanup activities focused on the following parks, Peridot Path, Cedar Pond, River Hills, Rahn, Well Site, Walnut Hill, Trapp Farm, Fish Lake, Northview and City trailways. Total cleanup cost for this work was nearly $11,500. Approximately $3500 of regular and overtime labor costs were incurred in this area. An itemized report on parks cleanup is available if Commissioners have further interest in this topic. 4. Turf Maintenance Program A comprehensive turf maintenance program was developed in the spring of 1967. This program addressed all components of turf maintenance including mowing, fertilization, aerification, topdressing, overseeding and spraying. This new program expanded the department's commitment to high quality turf in community athletic fields, community parks, special use sites and neighborhood parks. Accordingly, commitments to the summer mowing program incre E~d from five seasonal employees in 1986 to seven employees in 1987. Frequ,,noy of mowing for each site was in the range of five to seven days. Acreak,? :cowed included boulevards - 900 acres, gang mower - 816 acres 1,474.9 acres, for a total of 3,190.9 acres mowed through 9/28/87eral pig°>6~ An aggressive fertilization program was implemented for all park sites and public buildings. For the most intensively used sites, fertilization was made in May, July, September and October. For all sites a total of approximately 110,000 pounds of fertilizer was applied. This compares to 51,870 pounds in EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 6. SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 1986, representing more than a twofold increase. Similarly the turf aerification program was also increased in frequency and number o sLtes. For instance, athletic fields were aerified a total of three times 1,0a TYill be aerified one additional time this fall. Overseeding was accompli;~'hed on all free skate areas in the spring. In addition to this, overseed.izig in conjunction with topdressing will be accomplished on the newer softball and baseball fields, as necessary. Broadleaf weed control was completed can all park sites and public buildings during the fall of 1987. This prof-ram utilized a mixed herbicide application and in some instances a 6L- ular application. This program will be expanded in 1988 to include a pre-emergence herbicide program on priority classified sites. . Routine Maintenance Program The site specific maintenance program continued to be ir,pl ~n..te and during the summer of 1987. Tennis courts and playgrounds -re inL~p~ c i(jd. on a bi-weekly and monthly basis, respectively. Refuse maintenance was fo walized through a twice per week system of pickup. Park attendants at high use sites such as Trapp Farm, Northview and Rahn performed additional refuse maintenance activities. A majority of the building maintenance tasks were shifted to park attendants located at high use sites, i.e. Northview, Rahn, Trapp Farm and Goat Hill Parks. Athletic field striping, ball diamond dragging, and other routine activities were also conducted on a standardized and scheduled basis. 6. Special Events Both full-time and temporary staff continued to commit a significant amount of time to support of special events and recreation programs and parks. These activities included setting up for Evening-in-the-Park programs, coordination with Tiny Tots, Summer-in-the-Parks and other special events. 7. Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Program Implementation of this program in the fall of 1986 has continued -to have successful results for the Parks Maintenance and Forestry operations. This program addresses all phases of equipment maintenance including daily au d weekly preventative programs, scheduled maintenance, and repair work. The Equipment Maintenance Program has had positive implications for reducing the amount of down time and costs associated with repairs. 8. Weed Inspection Activities The 1987 Parks Operation Budget included a part-time position for a Weed Inspector Aide. The Parks Supervisor is the designated agent for enforcing the City and State Noxious Weed Ordinances. In April, James Jensen was hired as the Weed Inspector Aide to Park Supervisor McGuffee. It has been r. Jensen's responsibility to enforce both the State and City ordinances relating to the cutting of weeds and grasses on all properties within the. City of Eagan. Mr. Jensen has proven to be a very reliable and capable ernployoe and EAGAN ADVISORY PARKS D RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE 7. 'SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 has shouldered the burden of this program. For the period April 22 -hough September 28, Mr. Jensen has responded to 216 complaints from th,f- gal public. Follow-up inspections have resulted in 125 info nn ation,al noLA_c,,j being sent to property owners. Official State Weed Notices wo-o >;i1; to 37 property owners. Approximately 97.2% of notified owners have coii,,I) Iied with the initial informational notice. The creation of this position ;~knd a more strategic approach to handling the weed ordinances has resulted in a more comprehensive and viable weed notification and compliance process. 9. Forestry Activities Forestry staff also experienced a very busy summer this year. A site specific program for cultural treatments to trees and shrubs in 'Bile park : y. bem was implemented. These tasks included pruning and trimming, mulchnz and irrigation, fertilization of nursery stock, insect and disease control and nursery maintenance. The City Forester was also extremely busy in response to public inquiries about tree diseases and tree planting. A total of 239 inquiries have been responded to by City Forester Tom Schuster so far this year. Assistance to the City Foester is provided by a full-time temporary forestry aide position in the spring and fall periods. FALL WORK PROGRAM Maintenance and development activities during the fall months will be focusing on the following areas: A. Maintenance *Mowing *Fall fertilization *Topdressing and overseeding *Athletic sites *Aerification *Rink and warming shelter preparation *Routine site specific maintenance activities *Refuse maintenance *Field striping *Equipment maintenance B. Development *Quarry hockey rink construction *Northview irrigation installation *Goat Hill site grading, sodding and seeding *Paintingjstaining of new hockey rinks *Reinstallation of Lakeside play unit *Infield preparations at Quarry, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and Meadowlands Parks *Removal and grading of Highview rink area *Construction and installation of park identification L, _:L Qu11't°y, Ridgeoliff, Blue Cross/Blue Shield Parks *Re-signing of Highline Trail G ADVISORY PARKS D RECREATION COMMISSION PAGE . SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 I trust hat this has provided you with a good overview of the a opa and maintenan e activities of the Parks Maintenance and Forestry di~L,sioos during the past everal months. Should you have additional concerns, questions or comme ts, lease be sure to contact me or Director Vraa. Jo K. VonDeLinde Su erintendent of Parks JKVfnab cc: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks Recreation Jim McGuffee, Park Supervisor r CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTIOW 21, EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, IM REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLIC^ TIO An appl tc4 1c i has been suN?.__ist_'d req? e`;tA fir' <<a i< 9 . 7 . _ 7 t~~ t s (Agricultural) acres; a M i x e d Use e i s it' nf l e :.:staw7ahouse units located along he southwest intersection of D e L woo d Drive and Pilot 'ti Road. The a r„xuar1 1987 Land u Use to dcs=,1,11r te-,; this . r e T~'..I7 6 units/acre). This .L J proposal is consistent with that )a ana T_.c f :Lrsrt addition 37,3 acres) will be the sin"' family area with the townhouse area being as Outlot (2,4 acres) for future development. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently, the siLe is mostly open grassland aLt a tts _ z:_a trees o:i; the no Lh, south anc-1 eastern property lines. Because of 'C 1~a _ g the t, site appears ,ot [Pwi;d t:. sheltered _L(t~ti b~1 a ~;.,•3r- Road. , ^..I Pilot . ~!Carle of these . E3 F'''. ; areas will be, disturbed and in areas t'd,anre the tCco i1. ii;. t?: c,3KS, >aurni . i CiT1w1 il. 1 to d ca >3.ng v'~ L'~ l be planted for :.>C"LF_'eni and ;,ons~_si:£'ncy, The developer has expressed concern over the possible unnecessary loss of trees with the Pilot Knob Road T ~ improvements. .i They t..ropo;ter' the use of retaining walls o that maintenance tree side slopes be planted as opposed t wick clearing of the _..e°.W. wherever there is any chance of saving these trees. The pond along Pilot F, C' ' <<:a will be a backyard amenity to seven adjacent lots. The 1002 wide Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement bisects he property in a northeasterly manner at the northwest portion o the s t'e. The i-.__ has existing storm sewer aaCe sanitary sewer easements raiin1, n'-3 through it at 900 angles, making 1 _f 7rani_tg x.47ztti any regard to the _`~he~~ existing topography difficult. This ~proposal sensitive these problems as well as the natural state of the land. The Knot) Hill P.D. abutts to the south with R-3 and NB uses, the cra{'<?.l to the west, G and D residential property to the north and the ,ai:Jden Valley Addition/St. john etzx.,an church on the east side of Pilot Knob Road. divided landscaped entry from ' ~ eer `vy7 C; €3 r,1 Drive serves SITE PLAN: A the single family a) tion of this development , forming a large looping street with 3 cul-de-sacs. The cenLec ctil-de-sac is in excess of 1500' but would serve 1 lots at _ most. The design goal, of the plat is to create a ^ 'strong' neighborhood feeling '(.~1e C.-_L .1-i.U_ ~1t'~5~~ Ponds Addition by the similar same developer. i 25° walkway easement for the school property w 1 e m n the need for n.ildF: F . to walk along ii `'rwo{ d Drive in the int. Pr months when the trails car not cleared. ,....e r' 83 Lots on 37acres give the single _ _ . l area ta gross density of units/acre. The proposed lib t s=i o would have 9.2 u n i t s / a c r e and the entire P.D. would have 2.6 units/acre. The minimum t width proposed f__? :i single family area, is t~. 'P =re a r.., some e stovepipe shaped ls,_, in the southwest portion of s . th`'' plat that are narrower at the 30' setback I 7 ne, however there are a4;i?;;f',nts that wC>i:ld prohibit building construction in that location so the homes need to be set back further into the lot- This was also done at Chca t Y t=on Ponds. The lot vary in size i rom 12 000 sat. to 28,800 The i; vc?lLpe_ i^^'.__? A,€iai StaI__ chi el'tisr a L Jntiso .S.- of h is s~_,ikhdi v is ion. This project with 2 or 3 pro.,:.)ose,._J builde.rs would be graded as soon as possible in an J =Cart t.t:7 have streets and utilitias aR tI C ; A ad home price byol_Il range between $120,000 $175,000, landscaping The additional being proposed is unique for a single family proposal Eagan. from he cul-de-sac islands and entraYway t h e developer w i l l . b adding front `Jar trees on every lot in groupings that will create a more natural setting as opposed to a single tree per front yard. O the p~_t;nt. i€'t: 1 swe..tg staff c recommends the use of native ::~atc°Y lczE.~. as s ; often as possible the arr`., retains as much of the original character as possible. A! I of the backyards in the loop area (.Ilso have J.rass plantings tila `=g71_L_t. help create privacy as well as maintenance free slopes on the rear property lines. All, sizes meet or exceed City requirements in commercial districts. GRADINGDRAINAGE/EROSI N CONTROL: The proposed preliminary car d .F'_ p.-Lar, 1-s, incomplete and does riot adeq-iuately define the proposed! 'rr.`-.':.ding and drainage ;ar=eas. The proposed grading plan is deficient in the following areas: The f uture proposed Pilot Knob B`.o.ad ell, evations, were not incorporated .!_att°;t the r c`?!a t_ i;q plan The existinq contours for the upgraded Deerwood Drive were not j incorporated into the grading plan, T along BP-27 S ,~u' proposed grading _ ~t ie northerly etti Ei~ if~.. Pond ~'~E c is not Wined in the grading plan. Back yard and side lot line drainage swales were not defined. The proposed cute section along the Deerwood School Addition exceeds 'pile T .1 iiu m 3: 1 a? 1 owal I ? ope`? cr l t r. ia, ~ov,,,e er t sa.E,Ce F_,,repairation of a proposed grading plan, the developer has been in contact with the Dt~E'.? 4,iJcrd Sc'?oo._ ano. has stated that a slope easement from the school could be acquired - k_ rl t n:1. i- 1 "f. g the t „rope a<" ea which ,ceC:',,fs t,,`._' maximum allowable : slope criteria, The most centrally located cul-de-sac in Block G needs 3o be raised to provide +Y..'}OSit1VE' storm water drainage. The cuil-de-sac as proposed will create a land i_oc ked low drainage basin. In summary, the developer must submit a revised grading plan. The development proposes to direct its storm water runoff directly into Pond M-3 and directly into the existing trunk _.'riit ewer whs c i lows through the site north. Further analysis a E the pr: pc d kid .m sewer system cannot be performed until a new grading plan meeting the City's criteria is submitted. An incomplete preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan `y,!a`J submitted as a part of this application. `i_'he erosion and sediment control plan should follow the submittal requirements for a grading permit and general criteria as provided by the City of Eagan, The major erosion and syd7P11.''rIt C:C:,. ',stF"t_r"Cal issues f>;a tii_ site rx`i%s r_(_t., ' de this S.1_+t they benching r. f all lots, directing surface drainage on individual- back into the hill ra'E.r?e_€ tslc3rl don%i"t the hill L-roilt lot to oty lots _ seeding and mulching after rough grading and u~il,ity installation and erosion and sediment control on individual lots during the home building UT I3.s ITI IES : Water supply of sufficient capacity exists in Deerwood Drive along l Krioilb _ _ G R The ,r` e_ o, I';1 E? t propose--s adequately loop the lateral. water main through t- h development, Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth presently exists s ; si C~iY`%Fla'gthroughout the proposed This dev _1.`a EmnenS shall. be r jJ 5 i ~a~ t~ :_Jr any damac3e o modifications 3"..o the existing .r (4£iP storm a7 sanitary sewer ^,yst _ t '1.'l`irrch may result t=Y(?;i`t any r-'`,Z:1ding or construction activities. TREEEwa/ACCESSICIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is taken from Deerwood Drive in one location. No access is proposed to be t ) i i t Pilot Knob Road, The entrance location along DC 1: wo) d taken Drive is such that maximum site distances are obtained. Internal circulation is prsss.-..d°is G%:Lth a r_.°'t_.rct_ is}o~ street including t.h"._'e a . The pedestrian walkway is pin)vided in the southwest corner of the proposed site to the westerly adjacent school addition. 'The development shall be required to make the necessary connections to the southerly adjacent property and to Pilot Knob opposite the entrance Lo Chatterton Ponds. The proposed entrance island shall be removed in a_:3 final plat and construction plans. Street 1 the southerly adjacent property (Knob Hill o Eagan) is not proposed. in the approved preliminary plat tiill of Eagan, liCtu Lai] is extended northerly from Diffley Road to the westerly boundary of the preliminary plat, The developm~ent shal]_ be responsible for provi,,3ing tlhie required rigjlnt-ot-way and slope easements; for Pilot Knob Read a r'ecjuia_=-d by t' e Dakota County Highway t The development shall also be responsible for providing right-of-way widths for proposed :}£.-AF ._wood Trail and the three cul-de-sac streets p 3,.A 1 with A City C '}i_ `i?dxDiG°ii take :access from S.~~~eeriY r,~ Jii}d Trail '6 ~y accordance it- y ~construction, Eagan re u:.IAF'eiLents fo 4.7-e a All v v regulatory d.=a'enC"y permits shall be reC.~rl}_red in i. timely manner as required by the affected agency. a F,SS ENTS: The proposed a..STe.f.C>TAi;E_`n tz::ss, bee 1-,rE'raiously assessed for sanitary ewer trunk, water arz a€ stor1,'El, sewer trunk, the water af'era... benefit (Deerwood Drs°v:_) t.'~c1C_ street (Der .bdx}o(_:e Drive) at the single family rate. The following assessments are pending under Project 466, Pilot Knob Road street and storm sewer imVrovements: Descr io at Quantity mo o. t Street $_t7g r?/F 1,022,07 tF $18,111 Storm Sewer w 12 ~~a>.d~ 16,000 F.i _.1F 9s:0 Total Pending Assessment $20,031 The following assessments are proposed a a condition of f final ?:?_Lat approval: L'' Esc _iptio Bete Quantity Amount 24-A Water Lat, Benefit (Pilot Knob Road) $12.47/FF 1,317M FF $16,423 83 Sewer Lateral Benefit 30M/W 2,604 LF 78,432 257 Storm Sewer Lat. Benefit 20. 78//LF 1,416 L 29t' d24 Total Proposes Assessment $124,279 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat d.L ,fens ion and the date in effect at the time of final plat approval, It s' iou ,d be noted that Outs of r has an underlying c proposed a E re multi-residential. Additional assessments ?nS ll be G?qui ._x if and when Outiot A is developed to its future proposed use, CONDITIONS: 1E T standard platting conditions it b adhered tom 2. The cul-de-sac in excess of 500' shall be permitted. 3w T tot development shall acceptable >1,~)~4l.l_. , a . grading and i.l C ,a_. af „iv staff to wh3 t h addresses but is no limited to } issues outlined in the staff report, 4. The development shall. assume full responsibility for a! damages which ~~~tay result and/or c~~.n. any reconstruction. 4... i existing trunk facilities whic.h miay be necessitated by, t-,,- ;:rad ing an,d c 011 C! t i a n ac;tiv i.tzes of the - 0 r o p v; development, e <.h proposed entrance island .7ust ed from the fina plat and construction plans, 6, `a'}A d'`..'v e to '7 ite:S.b sh a 1.1 be required to provide access to s'h southerly adjacent property, access to Pilot Knob opposite V, Chatterton Ponds entrance, coordinate the north !=:.1tYan4.:e a'd 1. the property owner north o I,Fee?_6'vood Drive, th 2i~t-l c~~(~. r1.e1.. i.. - o ,-,tweet a 9S STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PIAT APPROVAL A. Assessments l„ This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in t.° e staff's report accordance with the final final plat d~mdimensions and the rates A. S .4 effect at the time of final, plat approval. m B. Easement.s and Rightgs-of- av ltt This development shall delicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way, 2 'I4"i1"s.s development shall dedicate, ~ ~~r`auviC~csa or fiszasnci3la ."fir guarantee i +'s proportionate s ; a ite' acquisition s ~',.b~'~. costs of additional dramagea n,d:T .a+ g and utility ease.n,,, nts as required by the alignment, f.ier)t11, an storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of ~ ;f this plat or outside of y,,, dedicated public right-of-way a. ; ~ necessary ?"n c~ service this development. 3m This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and 'i.i'm1"`:'trar s.oL',~ p of easements for ultimate development adiuc ent roadways as required by the appropriate JurUicutio al agency. 4, This deve!Opment shall dedicate, adle q` te drainage cind "c:}.A~-1ing easement to 1 incorporate se ~"ei~uaS~"£, water 3 ~fi-.. -.s, ~ high 1'dsa elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume b_pquiremen ts. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this dFe Seelcopm'nt shall be designed by 4a . registered professional engineer tidiaccordance veer _ s" with City s codes and engineering standards can policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed! grading, drainage, erosion, ar-;i,i sedj_meni- control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards an a T*'7pro e by staff prior to final plat sapprovd_l b 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detail-EEd l Anclsc:°ape plan shall be submitted on t1he proposed qra d1 xg 1Jlcia'1 and c"'.p113"4?vE'C~ by staff T3iM.csY to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall b included in t-he Deve.1.C%b>71e it CoiJt.rzic . ciI';c=9 iio released ilI`itil one year after the date of installation. (OVER) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PEAT MPROVAL PAGE TWO All internal publ c and private streets sha 1, be constructed within the required right-of-way i n accordance with City design des D, Public Improvements V if any public improvements are to be instal-led under City contract, the appropriate project mi.Ist be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval, E. Permits E This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required any the aftected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1R This development steal fulful its parks dedication require-1e%-its as re o~imendei.7 by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council aci_1o.iao G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to 11nles specifically granted a variance by Council actio 2 Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: AuQust 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised. ..,rv,A DORA- rE 1. t K N c"Aw ` . SITE K RG tICt JF~LStt1ii!11111((('''''~((~~'''''')11I" 7 44`/j CT. t xa. :7 Q 7T 1 j ZONING t.• D-11 I r 3 N 40 LAND USE MAP 44 4 .G f'd 'hc .rt7_. ~✓l•r•'r~'l~ - h .'r \ v l 35,9 068 ;ZL f V\ ~ t v q~e _ za ~Z Ate' I T. oti i M 4. r...> v _..F s QI ~I )I,~+~b~ fti o 0 s (}S _ v / R V 9 1 t e4 _ h6 ow e .q r t' e` LV - i i ~ j C.n~ ~ V k p W ' ~ , r W ti 161 w j 'J{I ' a d ti ° G"(1N7Y _RQ.IC~... . /+'J 3! ~ ~ _ _ - PlGO~' ~KNQH _ _ ROAD. d s- - /3/704 ;keu: zsx >ua.,,Na zns t aasrs~-.. ;xor,,nr l..e ~~en.. s sr r*+.. +cu.ue»> bh a yy yxx o e 4~ ~ , h4 C~ " £ r s Y rPY~ S x-: an a e _ _ yea r _ E [ 4• l 3 'l i z PRELIMINARY PLAT ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES a 0 ~0 900 FEET > /32a 68 ~ f gw go x ~I~ gggg e m I ` I A ~ m i ~2 AA x n % Ala N _ `,Sw S 4K Dt~ a r ~ I= g~ ..r_ X U oy m ~ t oo n z IT a A _ _ _ x 1 " f F I f 1 - N (?1 ~ 'S' J ~ ~ ~~~xY11.~px xxx~Mx~ ~ 4 l t 1 11 w 41 S =11^iS o q~ € ~ 1 1 I R,w _ 1 NO ~ 3! <.ea PILOT KNOB ROAD - COUNTY ROAD /31317Z04 04 179'75'36" Y ~ i9 A 0 C, a a r-v-_ DEERWOOD m { PRELIMINARY SANITARY T ENGSTROM A TE AI LA ROBER COMPANIES i 0 50 100 FEET ~ I F,K_ zr•r c.» - ~ .35A~T ~w - r J / `7"~ \ 1 `.1 i Y3S06 :rte" 1 ,..i,r :r r a r t n t - - ! , i-LY S ~ wiiu~ ~.R irca sew, i A~ ~ t l k ! F ~g ~y r z r 71 N 7@ s g ~ s v _ t j _ I ~ v R , 16 ro rYZ Y ~ { . -0` - . COU/d7°Y ROA/?{' No -ROR~ r 1 _ ~ i ~ /31704 L - - m-- a ti _zzivs-36 _ a n W ~ ~I V $sj s r GRADING, STORM SEWER, ROBERT ENGSTROM AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN COMPANIES _ ~~0 100 FEET CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DORCHESTER OF EAGAN) APPLICANT: KELLER INVESTMENT CO. LOCATION: N 1/ SECTION 28 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (EAGAN 40) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 16, 19S7 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS PPLICATI-O SI-Fr RY: An application has been submitted requesting a rE-'ce]-it1ir~ y F1_ft__7_t s. the norche er of Eagan Addition consisting of 320 rental apartment units on the Eagan 40 Planned Development _.t.,_ south of County Road 30 and west of Thomas Lake Road. The January 1987 Land Use Map designates this area D-1 (0-3 units/acre); however, ~°ev;Etl/er, the P.D. zoning sUpe:f". £.d?s the L,xi"ad Use Plan. An EiaW € h t received a negative declaration was completed in 1986 9._o this __t and the previously approved Deerfield Addi.T:ion I'llinie Eagan 40 Planned Developinnerit, containing 39.6 acres and 338 total units, was approved in 1975 for a ten-year period. In May of 1986. action was taken to t.xF_.=nd the P.D. agreement for a three-year period. At that time, the Deertield Addition was also approved for 322 apartment units on the west side ot Thomas Lake Road and the 2.2 acres on ± G. h Q ' e a s t sl dcam' were to have no more than 16 housing units. A proposed road extension (Sandi Drive) connecting Thomas Lake Road westerly to johnny Cake Ridge Road is consistent with the original P.D. concept plan, S IT E' CONTEXT: This site is surrounded by the Boulder Ridge u`z-2 tov>nt-.ouie proposal and q4i:~: d homes to t_I7E' east, qt.1_~~~ i"onles to Cu i south, and undeveloped RB and R-4 land to the south. The topography is primarily rolling grassland that generally flows toward a ponding area near the center of the site. A deep ravine that enters that >_are'C7 from the west is wooded, as is the area, c7_ on a t1ne southeast property line. Other innuature tree stands are scattered, throughout the site. IT PLAN: There would be four 80-unit buildings, with two on each side of the east/west street as opposed to the nine 36-unit buildings in the Deerfield proposal. The southeast portion of the site would remain an irI?;distuYriE'.d open meadow. The buildings closest to Diffley Road would have a divided landscaped entry with a larve retaining wall '_.;ng the western property line. These buildings, s[Iilllar in length to the t_aE'it.= y Lake Apartments, would be constructed first, with the southerly buildings following in a second phase. The roof Aittvbi of the ,,uilil1nq was reduced to lessen the height and potential s'~` pc;t°T~. v zr'< I i t h e ThoI7! a> Lake Heights Addition. S ¢:a f f requested that t, landscape architects r.-! ov t.d C s U l.. .f. ns, tf...T ~ ~ ~ iJ shT this relationship, 1h proposed landscape plan attempts to enhance the existing ',%t':1E7tat:.Lo€i and recreate the I?dtu._<l conditions often a possible, Oversized evergreens are being proposed in an effort immediate to reduce the impact. Staff also recommends planting all areas in the second phase (that would not be disturbed) with the first phase planting. All of the ti ) ~ S 1. fi C _ will be on n Lot 1 , B l o c k 1 or Lot 1 g Block 1 Therefore, G Lot 1, Block 2 on the south side of the east/west ` road. The apartment area density is 8q:3 units/acre ;.1z~S .1 and oil! setbacks 1 meet Cod requirements. ''he bui. 1 «?.Exgs t x1em C'.1 v _.s '.1;.11!1 Cif' g r ay ,I f t ;h white trim like the Royal Oaks Apartments. Two tennis courts and a recreation building are proposed with the first i1Y1ase. There will be one parking stall included teal iii the rent and one exterior stall meeting City requirements. E P4`X5.7.4 ..14' 1.~ fba AS..N.C'Y.GE/ R .ROSAON CONTR8..,8 3: The proposed sito h 77 t ` dii Farent _-?<l s ranging From a high point southwest corner o this site to c lo vi point antit;f grading is required to accomplish the p sfloor elevations f f ~p and t ~~c>?c3~F~ finished buildings r re qu 2d to acc{~mpl isin the proposed building pad elevations, The development i proposing to provide on site pC'3Tzd1._ng to handle storm water + t .L f generated by the development. The area belo,,q •q the 910 generated elevation is required to adequately hail7_l_ t" storm i~at- runoff CY site. The outflow from this ponding a will b limited to n (1) CF S. The area b 910 elevation hot.dad be preserved in an ease -el-It to protect t the proposed panding area. Outlets to the ponding area should be extended to the iv W3_ , UT 11, 1 WE It S : Water development is service of :a :1 t.-i 7..<;3E n%: c:i'LDFf;%iC'y to serve the readily available 1 from Ft~,ls~~ existing 1 1~?re trunk T~y mains ilocated in . L!? Eft ley Road and ~!1.Aoz~.as _1a;b.e Road. l.~ad. :~~he development proposes to adequately loop the proposed lateral the site and provide the „t'^'C.`~ssar stub to the ester ~i~~"j!I~Ci`. 'E~ propertyThe development proposes c_a-IC s M:3 t t x i c-1L y _ ~.aterr.i L . i ~2 a. . Y . Y .>.1 i '~yL A e4i :"authe t erI and tie into the existing n the _ ? e 'I_ R a s Lake Heights { y Addition, -j access from Diffley Road on the north a d Thomas 1 atdfr-a Road on G.,h -east. Dakota County has committed to _ llou i ng OnEa opening along i)iit f 3.e h Rc_adx V he d veL 'tment is prC?po.ta7.atg to coIi+`€".i"uct a pr 'it;,te stre t fi:or,", Diffley Road to the proposed east-west public street which connects Thomas laak aC:ad with the westerly boundary of the proposed site. N1 ~ ar TS-OF ~ a~~~U ~-WA'PERTS: Dakota County requires <z 60e - r ight:-o Mw y° re °.:r,.C ive access, except for one location near th e 'Yam 3z the property, along Diffley a. The development w i l_S. t responsible for dedicating a 60' right-of-way for the proposed public street which connects Thcmnas Lake Road to the ovesterly boundary of t'.€z' proposed site. eilleI1t in accordance with PCity 5f aga~; standards will be req if_d for all storm °4'ewe q sC2d:Ftar ~3E~k'k~t.'£. and 5~/tilat L A regul xt_C3r agency permits hal.i. te4 qiIi red %dititin the appropriate time frame as required by the ASSESSMENTS: The proposed Dorchester of Eagan site has as previously been a essed for sanitary sewer trunk, water street , J~:;~f" ~~1a;a G r benefit area, for Thomas Thomas aa~~t rai and storm seSp-:.r along Thomas Lake Road. There here are no pending assessments against the proposed site and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: Project Destion Rate Quantity Amount 257 Storm Sewer Trunk $,067/SF 1,422,347 SF $95,297 ~ i 5 23d Water Lateral Benefit 20 M/FF 90240 J i' 1 344 L at. Water .t~at. Ben, Upgrade 8w08/FF `:a84w?8 6 F 4,723 County Road 30 76MOF 977A0 FF 75,182 Outlot A AssL?._,.iislent Approved by City Council and S.p. Assessment . Committee 35,000 Total Proposed As zessm'n'su $249,045 The final assessment amount will be determined using T:a;_F in effect at the 'T`ime o the final plat approval id based on final pl at dimensions and areas. CONDITIONS: 1All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to, bu The garage shall be included in the rental uT~1.~3v price only s . ~..r ..t- if f~ 3 ~ ~ two stalls per unit are provided with this project. 3Lot 2, Block 2 shall be incorporated into Lot 1, Block 2 on the final plat, V Perimpter landscaping in undisturbed areas of the second phase shall be installed with the Eirst phasp, 5 , All PlUblic utilities and streets 'lE~. _C3~?,_~en shall be petitioned for ~4- e developer and ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. .La Th s de'~e L. 4...1p meet shall 6ccept i .s G:..~diti'~.~.i~3al <.:.:~>.°.-_ate~"-~3sT.et~'nt I> a es a I : w~ to ~ ~ ? is E~ e 's a i gµ i2 F_' Ga ~ as ¢ ~ ~ i" _ ' C , .'I 7L _ 1"1 ac o nce~ with the s < _Q. p at ~<ATI«E~ x s ~ vns an 7 i ?:"c~ rites in e fe t a the time ofr fin p?zat pprova3'.. ~ This dove r"'j'~ment „=hal l dedicate 0' dra naage aand ut i I3 t y ea~'~-"em nts ce nt er e~~ over_ %~a l ? r.~ommon to ine s aI CI ardj ace t to pi f.`1`at`we prop erty or ubiic r'a_g`-`+'--oa ~.`/d~1`~m 2. ~~Thi s dc'.~°E~~C;~ pent shay ~ ~ ded caat .y " ~ i ~ gua a t.e:e~ t,s pr o~aC'r t a~'7:;ate sh r e o .~ise cl+vC'u ~ s ~ :Lon cost ~ of additl.r_ na_! dr°`aina ge, ~~ond Ga aandd fat __1 ty e set>Si.ont s 4~,s *`ee~L2ared ¢ix i az 7e r k,F Y l.. i L C~i. _ t Zi iii E: ° l_ y ( ~ u ~ e g~ r~. K_~ storag capa~ Ta ty of aa~ l re.'~'uir e;;~ ub a,ac, of .lit es t-0nd s;:d eke s ~ oca ef.~s beyo2~d the bo?' i,~=5 ~ e,°s of° "his 1 J' a i'" or o"t.il.zi.~y:de C}ryf C~t~~71?iy'at~{F~-_`d pub a'_ ~ ~i1i.-of-w y a i nieces ar o aand ~t~ea$ ora3r slope ea,ltiment for ultimate develop:'ent 'L,3'~ a ~iac:°~e..it. roar: =^7a3.4i ~s ass requ.a.re~d by t~1e a.pp~_opr,at.e T ~ ~'x J. ~e ~ ~ t' a3 ~ ? all ~ t' ~ ;1 ~ C;l ~ 1. ~ a~ e~ a b ~ t:~ Cy as ra r ~ YI ? :-i £a i1 T'i C~ ~a, po .ng e~caseme=~ its to ~_Z7,f.:"°'i1"G-orate the r'_C~I.~1.re C3~ eti'c31:e elc'.~,f2ca.a~'i~? neces 1tat£~c<` ~y City ci'`orm wa3te stC.rag 'do.~tS? e se'r'~.i.ce to this da,'vclo °,,=;nt s a l§ bJ e i e ;Yegi tore ~1~"€fessit~nal a5TlC7ineer in ~zt"+~'.~~C_~ance x°11 ±~i' C f.3J y ~ ~ p L ] \ t ~ry .j'" y'~ g e it a a ' a d_ ~ Lam. 5~ ~ _d...~ 2® A det , ~ ed grad ng, Odra in age, eros on, ::tnd 4~f'C%J_'.ient C ty st~~._:~da ds ~~n ~a;~~1roved y stray. ~ rior to fin ~ plaat f4"'. 3~ his deve t~i~men shall in ure t~~?at <a1_l tF?;aporary dead end p;.abli5 atreet> shall 1h,a`+ e a. C":"ul-de.-sae' ~°Cit~.`>~~ructe,, 1,n sa~:cored~nce~ witY~ C~? ty e~ dr3inee ing 3~ {x;e~~r~ds. ~a A deta~aled :~_t~ndsccape plaan z~a~ll e s3aa~i;~°.i t.e o: d,he "opo sed €_~ra3i? za p an a nd a p ~ st_ f. r r t h e ;~r ~t3 ~ ~,1~ a :'aci~ ~ ~eE~_ :x~It''S~~pX1~ '~ba~ tL%J:kY2° i.<_i~ e~iA.1.~.iZa~+:..f_ r:~'Ec.~ ~ 1,tsc° i t,adoc:<c 1n, C-he De+Te ~.ob°m,c'.nPL ~_'on&tir at_ and n~~t zel°ea3 ed until o~2e~ ~iec3r after 2`:'f1e fas.ate )f ?I" ~',`~_al l'atooAx b, VER ) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE T 5. A 1. ..4_ internal public and private streets shall b constructed w i t h i n t n°s e a e (_r,i r ed riq ht""o '•wa4T in accordance with City design standards, 1If any public improvements are to be insta.lle-d under a City contract, the appropriate project be approved by Council action prior to final cplat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of of ! regulatory agency p.^%Iilits in tin time frame required by the affected agency, F. Parks Dedicatio- This development shall fulfull, its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action, G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditicns shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 198 R'rept:F'[:be-` 15, 19 f Revised: STANDARD `I' P Twarw PM , o x I .AY Rd tfMR"MN ~ t R rn rer+~+. as a t LEMON DR 5}M1M j!~ R ST CT. z Caw (C(C~''s'nu( Clft SITE ~a of P i 14 aR. L R - r y R S Np•µ P R AY A~a ` Y` AY ad e.,vr I~r~ HILLANDAL 1-q--,--- i ~ Au ~ .~~A A 7`r ~`tt _R B ,ZONING -IR i 1 d 1 ~ } 19 LAD USE MAP 1987 LAND USE MAP 3 R-ilh' R-: ' FI a • w. D 111 k a^+~j 1 { y T Ho 5 A, S,- a /a x - / ~~j]y{,fit - _ y R-11 ®s a,V. P vhA?Ld"`R°"~' R-11 f'; i7YW A 4~1'.X}i_. ;P~~ C~R i, i ~ r unL x L: f •L s~ y{ t t, R CSC \ `d C x. t+ r P-0-4 va j \ ot p ~v f a A O r c ys n° a Ti i, J 41 ~,,e.~.._ ""w--.._. 434.,._x. 14 r a rte'"l~ . z _ U 6' y F, a t Gs o if A v~ 46 r o ~ ` u+ b ~ M ,_4Q . ~ p o w t> 7 ®N N d w ~'S 14-9 - % ~A9'C 4y1 KPq Pl.. ff ~ I + t o x z p p o{ u C tx~ d a ; b y P r F P T r B~ F P V y fn (J\ JP a P 73 Rt V R T jy ,s Fr ? p r o F t r ".t o s> ~ c~ ' ~~v (v ~ F F ~ ~ ® oa X 1 aQ z ~ u X ~ X £ X X VwCS, ` tyT l.pwWb 6 { I p V•rC,x=r ur.~,z /4 ,err ri~n+'!q 742.4 9 F+ a ` Q IV D A n.' ~ r O ~ i 4 A "r i ~ nbn o 1~ r w J, J ,s b / 9 F ± r \ ~CS+ o d' G C d A ~ !058.84 `4~ ~ 1 "aM < $ i 3+4. if7$'~ rA.'Y 4.c aa+s M.Vat. j,~ c °T° of es r1 A S c.. A rc.°Z KT 3 / f ~ ~ A i R~ i v g In a5 i ` p tt~ a rj N° a "s o GP i* t~ . a Y " 0' f F F d if 19 r 14 i °~u X ) X~ . z q~ x 77 a _ ~ ~ 'r,f f i ,t~~ J , tt ~ a L. J1 1 1 I ! - J { OKI, r _ f J ~ w i,! 'r" J e t k s A CxarEC S r& 5 MAN { -.uG r m .wa.9 a msml. auan V _ i , \If x i ~ e ~ Ws t t t - , - } 4 y p r i rrr M•~ ~ ; - l JJJ - t t -4-- , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f i v ?s t C\\ i r r ~ ~yrrt r 41 Z ~n h J AND ASSOCLATES ARCHTEMS r C PKIMA y ZEE "T7 f7 qAp ti Illp Ab.~M.N{d ~t LPtvM HQT® p9tdg EE I'M , G..:. OIES'TM OF FAGAN PLAN TWU PLAN ME !'40, TO: DALE C. UNKL x , CITY PLANNER MIKE FOEWSCU, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 SUBJECT: REVISED BUILDING BLOCK DAY CARE ADDITION n July 1.98 7 , the Building lock Day Care Addition received preliminary plat approval as WEA! as a _P11-anned Development ?,i!enC ient to af.1_or7 a day care facility in a LB district. Since then, a proposed automotive service center south of '-'gat late" abC[tGe rig Cliff Rt?aL"a was denied by the Afj u'? _'0:: Planning Commission and withdrawn by the developer prior to Council action an September 15, 198A The developers of the BUilding Block Addition want to revise their original site plan ,r« that a connection Ci:'tv7een Cliff Drive and Scott Trail an be made. This will split t A a. Cedar Cliff Commercial r'rark:: is Addition _rnti3 two separate o?.aT lCttsA O',at:.iot A (2.57 acre Oasti_ot B f1.8`3 acres) and t Building .1.~_<1,.... S Lot I will increase _.,ro't a69 acre to .87 acre The two outlots will remain designated for, T,B use and future platting, in an effort to ensure proper legal notification this s`ilW:L:9.3 ca on. i being broaxgh before the APC and City Council. prior to the final plat submission. Staff recommends that this pLat he renamed "Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition" so the natural progression of the Cedar Cliff Commercial `ark remain intact. original staff report and City Council conditions have been attached for your review with some new conditions. REVISED E,NGINEERING-REPOR.T GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan provides o _~.~C~?':~~` 3ia.<~ pr-~ ' iat.L~ _'x',; at 905 904 parking lot !=€l and respectively. Ou mac:}t A is proposed to be graded to approximately a 90 elevation in anticipation of future de°velt_pment.. At the of - i time i; preparation of this staff report, the dove _Lo:iS IB.'.n 4_ of an auto mail proposed on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3-,d Addition is uinknown, The proposed gra,,Jinq plan genera-Ily conforms to the existing grades on Cliff Drive and Scott Trail, The development is proposing to construct a storm water storage pond in t.i1 southerly portion of Out ion A ;.miie,d.1atC:ly north and west of proposed of e Block l_. The rtznof generated by Lot , Block I, is directed into a proposed temporary drainage ditch whlCii would in turn drain into the p'CSJp'o'sed s"CC}Cm water pond being constructed on the southerly portion of OiJ.tlC)t. AR The proposed drainage di t.;_,-; along the southerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 redefines t an FVii s1a1c drainage swat e which currently receives runoff from the existing storm sewer located at a low point in Scott `i`r.`ai lm This low point in ,.-=Coat frail is lop€i~ited 1iix,,,edLat _'Ly to the southeast of t`;e proposed Lot 1,, Block _L.F of When the outlet to Pond AP---50 f F-zT-Eng oast rE_y of, Scott Trai -4-7 is provided in the future, the dr.,ainage from Lot 1, Block 1. and proposed Outlot Ci will be required to be directed east into Pond AP- 50 Co.nsi deri_ng the elevations proposed for :ot:. 1, Block OL and u !_ot: Ba this alternate is the most feasible permanenL drainage plan for these two ar sar The developer shall escrow the necessary fund to provide the required t=''I Sewer and to fall and reland cape the Swale in the future when 7 Pond AP -50 outlet b 1 constructed. The storm sewer system which conveys the water r from the drainage s wale be,_`o-^Ieen Lot iy Block 1 and O; tiot !I into the, proposed pond on Out of A will need to be G}b-EI.done_d a that t.tme a No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as part of this application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service of sufficient size and capacity are readily available from the existing facilities in Scott Trril STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take auwe;: to the site from the easter; ly adjacent. Scott Trail. with proposed future e'c'1::ran:e off of Cliff Drive. The proposed access location from Scott `Lail cxC}e<tes a potential for a conElicting left hand t=urn maneuvers with the existing entrance to the development on the east side of cot.t. Tsai Staff recommends against the Scott Trail location and proposes the development construct its future entrance at this time. EASEMENTS/ ZIGHgym-OF-IWAY/PERMI` ITS The appropEiate easements will be required for the proposed pond,, its outlet and for the future storm ewer to be constructed in the "v91c^ l e between, .ice 7t 1, Block I and ()pit lot B. Adequate streets rights-of-way have t:'1C?en provided for Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. All regulatory aqency permits shall he required from the appropriate agency in the proper time frame, ASSESSMENTS: h proposed site has been assessed at the proper rate for £ians.+_aA w£'rf water and storm sewer trunk and laterals. There are no pending or proposed assessments of record. CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITIO.N ' u All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2R A revised landscape plan shall Y ; r, submitted on grading ana The financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. 3. it a shortage ot parking is evident, the City may re(qUire parking lat expansion. Nineteen spaces shall tie initially approved. Ms No i!ie t.ian F. a? units shall be v Asii` I. _.romi the r"e Ldrnt::L._<].. property or from Scott Trail. 5. The develo-,--)ment shall be responsible for the cost of the construction of :".die required storm s£vcne to coarve the r n Lf .._rcm Lot . 1g Block 1 and Otot.i_ot into the existing storm a sewer system in Scott Trail when the out'l.,-z-,t for Pond AP-50 is constructed, 6. The development Sed<6 b Z:es`a£afas:_ 1i(:' f~r constructing its) proposed entrance to f Cliff Drive at this time and will not be allowed access to Scott Trail in the proposed location. TANDNRD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 6 assess fit nts; 1. This development sbta,s..l accept its additional a,~.~se~ `.~JmA ~~nt obligations s defined ry $-J.l,~ staff's report e?A."co:c'd;wince with the final plat d...iT:eI`lS"ions %1n the rate in effect at the tuner , of Itinal plat approval. B. Easements and Riqhts-of-Wav 1s This :reveloJ_smeat shall dedicate 10' drainage y c;7.':;i utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2, This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of 'a?e acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as r°;egs.l1 .roc bt t"i;.¢ denth, an 7 storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3~ This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and tx ;i1po:iruaT:"`'iT slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadway* as required by the aL7propri?t^.''e Jurisdictional agency, V This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pand ! n i easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C~ Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in ati`ct,>;`cAanc e Sit tt1 City codes and engineering stoai: irds and piF.i.1 e sc arid approved by staff prior to final plat approval. ` 28 k detailed grading, $ se;ii~T1CI''n4~ drainage, erosion, c.31(6 control must be prepared an ar'co iia;1ce with curr'e'nt City standards ? approved b staff prior to final plat approval, K This development shall insure that a l l temporary dead end public streets shall idi xeI'e F,cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with h City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall lbe si ba`i:i. t ted on the proposed grading p.t:Ii and approved by staff prior to t;g~1c finals plat approval, The financial " iara!itee' shall be included in t1he p Contract not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5 m A! 1 inter n a! p tit) i s to n d pr iv a t e 3 L. J., e tits s! A a!! be constructed ~withs n the, i ?°i°u 'a a k~-.`d i 'a 9i, t° c)i." o. .ry in accordance with City design standards, 1® If any public imEl overnent s are to be instal-led under ca City contract, the appropriate project mius - be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits E 't`his development shall be responsible for t acquisition ot all. regulatory, agency permits in they time frame required by the affected agency. F~ Parks Dedication V This .T E' E_, j)1 e nt sh<.a lx_ fI.I ls iI ! its parks dedication, requirements a recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. OtheI° 1All standard platting and zoning conditions shall the adh re to unlress specifically qra: rated a va%iaiice by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: AiS -iusL 2`3s 1987 September _i 5r 198 Revised S AN iAM) _ PRELIMINARY PL OF DAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK D ITI N a ! F O OWNER t DEVELOPER y ! w• / Oti c° ./fi 5(d`s Y.O. ASTLEFORD COMPANY 090-04 - - - - - . !"5 - ~ Jres - ~ ' ~s.ce - ~ / Laga/ Lharrp f.:n 44!! 'p3.f fa.r✓ .f Or. f/ef A, Cwfi. C/.6f G ra.w.:/ I°+~~ AN. /.Ye J v > ^ v ry: 1 na.fFe./y .f Ca✓r. ff" {emmrie'.'r/ R..k 3..( A✓/: 1,:4. CLIFF a1 ' ~'a 4/° - \ y I :.y/ I _ tOaMtt WD x0. ai •f nE c!~ 6"'A sm -54 f "r; w~ L.. to VHNNITY YAP 6 .9 ,-S/ep Cf/d`p. 1 V ' ~ + ✓ ~ ~ ~ i~ i3 I tat ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~i s. a 44 t ~ ~ 8B8 J6 , COUNTY ROAD NO. 32 -j I R"8[IRTEs- zf7 vmgf.tr,xdw ma.!"Y4 B.ke <_l,=PY E 1 OF 3 I i CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK _ ADDITION N CITY OF EAGAN _ w 1 `....,mk_ I w... 1---------------~ - It, x,_59 ac,,'cL^rr,. ~TQ0, ( ~ 1,r 4 LEGEND .~..':M - Peoposeo aaa,xace AND aAAO,NC PLAN eRos,oN caraTRaL BARRIER 59188 «:R «<«..u «a, ME1[HEAT/810tH ASSO[IATES-. SHEET 2 OF 3 K- J i r5 r N ' f ~s x s~ Wi S i f r a f I h I E I rt KL a ~ f SCOTT TRAM M n I - f s' I I t r t d 5! S ~ i N 4 l _ ' s L °I Ire! do _ Fi ~ #`k I I I t ~ t d Na 7 i r' ~ ~ N k C2 `W ° W 1 j/ r.l l + ~ i r jA~t'31~: :dcMSrT"",~ AP^35 `t , / , • p SC„Csdai ~ I8 2:3 .1..51 ' ~ !2~ HH00 6 /r A-x rte; i 116 ~1av 1-171-l j j aVea,on e,' AP-8MI ° L --AP /6! 86893 ndG,i o TY°Q i>` r APT r~ 894, _B9^J., ~ jf_t-r~v7~,ti'~ .1_d % 1 D l 5 P 14~._ ~,~w i ~7Y•~ l 1. p°Z p«} ~ ~e ~ / 1° _IFt CI err 7 IIIfJJi~~~r7nd ` ~ I d {y r I & 893.3 r r^s~i 1 ` T)AP _ Li 11 - r 9C if AP-2`41 AP 22 I, - -''43D9oa0 1T~I 2t( „tur Attu? ill, 'u H72.g1 8736 696.01 rrrr; M 824.2, 8820___ 1. .9 .i, ()A-00 15' 12 I8• fr`; v, , n°;yAP-2k-- - AP-26 •.C r•. $93.1 MA " HH3.5 CP AP=9,"- 8866 r2 A-cc `11 i } .r Ib9B.B R:"Hrq ~ m AP°23 889.3 t lt~a AP~,49 d 900.0 8HI.7 f L° I rA-PP d t, \ C L71T~ - 889.0 ®i' 'z® AP=I t / AP=f1 912.1 889.2/j.1. _ 4 t Q9.4.2 ( \ 1^ 5 ~AP-50 88q 5 q 1 j(j LE ,t V, }'1 111 / \ j((Li a~ 1;~aF / H86.q BQ.J` dAP-42 89 AP- l O 1 . !-A + 1 9ff . 'm 7 - _ . t N 919.7'\ 1 £u` , _Jl-~ AP-13 (n 925.6.`s~°' r~ • Gu r 988.2 `AP-I4 -P14.0 912.1 SP 32? } \ J a RI t 1 / 919.3 -933 9: S i f . _ NT e- f 7 II ' . 9P1 94 f s 9 3T. u a..'. L.S. I~~\°. I cEttil- - 9(8.O ay 1 R j N 9 1 1-1 r F ee 12 - 1,;. AR ?Q ASP al& Ao °Il rjgIZA AP 45 Cq Bk, m, T, ~f rr r r it, AP- 16 r to Nd `cAP-48 OAi946.0 (CL1. t l _ ' : +14+~ yy(. ~.92q.q+ q ..92q 6 r r - 946Q''~ - t'r F-, 7~Z 1, 926.~?J ( AP - ' q ?~j y Lt 988l:8 5`2a• L r '9'11 1 '-'AP -46 j l h atiT l°' I }"_l p L)~ l,! AP 30 922.0 945.0 u v l ER ° + - f y 924 2. , t P- 946.5 'anx,r ~t~ 9P5I8 nQrJA„ 9s334.q'a26a rr, / DAKOTA COUNTY F 4..-+A-YY 1 i1' '2 AP-33 s za a-xx 9880 ks~as t r.tl . ~Jf { 1 rl i 985.3 SUBJECT PARCEL CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK r 1. city of eagan STORM SEWER aPProve standard PUBLIC plate LZIBO WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (YORKTON SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: ORK CAN LTD. LOCATION: M 1/2 SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGaT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 19S7 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS ?us P 11 1 C loll 10 N has been submitted requesting z"'. ~.-fi a_`aas:I aa_l.-aj.. i`'." r~at.: ;_ir~y~kkton ..out.:. ,i.;aUustra.a Park 2n'"'I Addition. 3 This plat consists of _ lots that are consistent w_L,_1 the overall conceptual plan that was eVi wend 3.fz 985. 1-,ot L of t 2n Addition is proposed for an t __i Yid :eL ttC7st°- tacility while Lots 2-5 _a..,_ be platted so they can be marketed as approved building sites. EXISTING _ CONDITIONS: The entire Y'til. 71 toa? South of 43.2 acres . abutting _ ii`v_' Y Grove Heights to the east and Hwy. 149 on i? the West. All adjacent land us « in Eagan are also 1,1 ti:Kcept o as t,a.g ri ultu al strip along, the wC >t_, side o.i. Hwy 49. The topography generally flows t ward3 the center of the s t%, c_ in a rather large ponding area. The existing slough and scrub trees in the southeast portion no significant vegetation -'>f any a..i'v on this site which contains mostly field grasses. The applicant will need to bring in fill to the proposed building sites. ENVTRON ENTAI_, SigU Sp0 ERALL CONCEPT: The two existing buildings w , (452 , 0 .f. total) of s e proposed ~ l h 'Zi n ' l ~'m e _ t~ ~ and c;.1 ~a_ ~ v.L~~ ~'~~_?,t_;c__~. Cato\"i',C)~.aTt..-- of 170,775 s.f. (35% o each lot) could total 216,257 s-f. o b,iild.-,;.ng area. This is bE!10VV the 300,000 s.E. threshold of a mandatory EAW. _ This proposal `!1'1 ! '?.a.t +__1 acres into tL~i lots (1 I+J€715 .r. maximum building area) aaaf_: leave the rest of the site as Outlot of this 2nd Addition. The applicant has - 1 proposed user E S F r Lot 1 and the other lots a r e being l:; ';_dx on a pe+. u lat T° basis. The turnarcmind, time for - t~ _a i_ s. F ; g each lot as , an individual addition has made it difficult to market the a. as an approved building site. A__ proposed uses for the 3 remaining would lots have to fit Paz. regulations OY Ls receive appropriate Council action prior h building issuance. w tc__ recommends that the front of the buildings valong Hwy. 149 and Becker Road 1jave an VfEice' p manufacturing look in order to he C? r'G s?- t.. ; s t L "i L`.L: C' C> l:z u, r ~ti_13'._Li1:l.az~3;._ that have ;:1 b1::Lt°k FaC`adem The applicant submitted .'ai. landscape plan tor all -.Y lots Cs.lon Hwy. 149 and Becker Road in 3 order to provide consistency for the entire development. All sizes, species and quantities are acceptable in a preliminary way. LOT I - This lot consists of 2,3 acres with a total Wilding area WL~, 117111 s ® f m or 31% in r 351 district. The r 3_ 1_ on the northwest co_ .ec of the bu., F1 t.,_i will contain 7,110 s.f. with the remaining 24,371 s.f. for warehousing. The office area would require 33 parking stalls with the warehouse parking to be determined by the Council. I appears that he 62 10' wide to L is will be sufficient - _ r for C!i.,ti; i't ~_:_:_#L~iC~. Wit-.< f recommends ;~i F'`.d moving the building to the east slightly so that the drive aisle to the north matches the entry into the subject parking lot or eliminato t'ne -!-,iedl'an on t'ne north side in Lot 2. Hanco Corporation, a warehouse distributor, will be the owner of the building. They a[ a distributor serving i`;s ':Lr`' industry, selling tirerelated products of all, There is no they buy products from factories and sell to tire dealers in a 10 state area. No e"_ tier is E. storage or pylon sign is being proposed with this bu i 1. d i rig. The applicant is aware of the City's requireirient that of top mechanical equipment is not visible a=rcn the street ~ ntJ none is being shown on the submitted elevations. If any is proposed (for all dots), it should be incorporated into the bum ldin'g design and screened °s'u t~h ti_.-: same materials as the ;;iu..E~fi.T.g i~'~C.,..ta~'h T. ~ ~ The pY oy,o._.a.:$ 2-story building will be constructed of bronze glass i. and precast concrete .1a.nF`.ls similar in f;`..C7lor slopes from State Highway 0149 easterly an ,d .e .s, j` r. y f r o m C o u T_ F` ` Highway 163 to a centrally located low area. The majority of this s i t e . requires approximately 6*-1<. ' of fill with minimal areas of cut accept for rj'i,"' excavation ?-''`r P.n::i _P_a/m PoTl..^ is a xe ij:1a1 _iS storm water in the C i t y of Eagan . . 7 m p_ , _ I = n s _ Storm Sewer Guide. The development proposes to direct all storm water runoff generated by this site into this pond. _ The installation of ,_ru7".}e storm S<,vv t facilities are required prior _ to the ultimate,, of the :_~i°i. 1,F'~"._7%5 The i~~i51C_E~ ~~i vilal,=sg _ - . r Pond GP-7 (C5. r'. U. outlet) are required For the development of r l. . t.. `ion nr _,,d,:, s lo_ _ ~ .d__ dove`i.~`'Jf- e .i~m The r£_qU1?e:' d~ storage _ is approximately 12 ac/A with its outflow requirements limited to 8 a 5 c E , t_.1 r. incomplete erosion and sediment .'CSS~rrOl L%~~aTl was a,a si?i~'T'i)t_t~'Cl }^dl.fii~ the preliminary plat. The erosion and sediment control plan should iii __ow the submittal requirements and general criteria provided by the City of t ~ 'r Eagan. An t,_iC?.,;,Zw and s dit;_t'1t control 7 nt to hi'_:l meets the general r including bi-th the .._i E-__ map a:'1CI. .a. narrative are - , ' required , ed to be ' ~ submitted bsubmitted al`!,1 approved by staff prior to is:ii<<llC'e _ Ct grading permit or final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service or this site is provided by an existing trunk sanitary sewer l i n e which 7 o+ti s t` H-LZ o:1 Cj t i this site "r) a L. l to ; rf_)7. to a 7..t station i t 1t'+it_ t7 o 'L C C- I n'_ _ j_na 63A. The lift station then pumps the flow from tls 7 e'* t-1 "i,l trunk sanitary sewer line to the existing ra`^7ii_.y sanitary sewer on the east side of State Hiqhway 4149. Wds _ r service to this site is ,rovt~.s by 6:z fiv Llt~< wc~t'-e~r IIi3i= along the e<.z.. r- lb' FdgL. of ..'%a.`.e Trunk H1."_?.wca:' #149 and an located 8" water main located on the southerly side of County Highway #63A. Me developer proposes to take his water service for t-he five proposed lots .:o the existing water mains in State Trunk Highway F _ - #14") Y.d County Road 6 3 a m Looping ot i _ i l Vd u tez iT. d s.:7 fr v A°t T nt existing water main . in County Highway 63A y south :;1 0.1 i ig the west side is A CouY- t'ti'' Highway iJ._ to an existing 8" Y..te7` main stubbed at. approximately the south line of ork"ton South dev e ,'pm nt:. `s77.l be rig piUp i as a condition oION rultimate development of the property. S'~gL55'zE`~~n~/ACCESS/ CIRC L 9R - The development proposes . to Aake access from State Highway #149 or the southerly . two lots o the proposed 7.. o i`.I . e LOt subdivision. The remaining tore lots r proposed to take their 3,..c x, rJ.L} County Highway 63A. These locations r t: subject to t approval _ o rc r reT ?e E. ° ve jurisdictiona-L agencies. EAS1RM:,`-ssV~~/RI.Gs_'~TS.....OF W Y/y3ET'x T- 'A.,i_ 1"r1')`=~,_,c..a development iYY.1 be i;Pz responsible for providing all . easements required for the surface drainage, storra sewer, sanitary sewer and maJu systems required to adequately serve this development. The development OIL required is dedicate a 0' half right-of-way for ~Y i..EL a~ /~I...t~, 1 ~ - r - ~ ._J.7-~r~;'+'_b: ~ ~t iiJ ~il7.t ii 55' half right-of-way for County Highway 46& All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a timely manner as required by the affected agencies. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been preViOUSly assessed fair sanitary sewer trunk and water area under Project #58, The proposed site is subject to the following pending assessment against the property from Project #442: PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 442 Storm Sewer Trunk $ .072/sf 641,200 Sf 46,16(,--) 442 Water uc3teT1l 14m56/Ef 1,365 'Cf 1%,St o- 442 Storm Sewer Lateral 174.72/if 250 if 68,822 442 Street 58.31/ff 1,365 ff 79,600 442 Services 2,860 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS --$217,400 assessments . proposed as c; condition of final plat :iiYlYQti3 m The following are PRO J 9 DES Rip, ION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 58-4 Water Lateral Benefit "y 20.55/ff 11108 ff $ 22,769 1951 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 15.06/ff 1,095 ff 16,491 Benefit 442 Storm Sewer T''ruA. a 0 c, /"f 196.660 s f 14,750 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $ 54,010 Al_? final assessment, obligations will be calculated based on sCi3;i i. lr'z dimensions and beef in effect at the time o the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: will I All . l 1 n e w ll be : u .'E3ct to i..h Sign ordinance and one time tee of $2.50/s.f. 2. Lots 1-5 shall have an Mice appearance from We adjacent r o d No roof top mechanical qu pm_.n fizz be visible fro-,l adjacent streets. 4, 70 -xt-rLor ;-~toraqo be, i o a! U _ its r obtaining driveway locations. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVALL A. Assessments 1 x This development shall acce x}74' its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report: in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates i effect at the time of final plat approval. V Easements and Riqhts-M 1Q This development shall dedicate 10' drainage ani utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2✓ This development shall dedicate, provide, o financially quc1 rc n tese its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, pond i ng. and utility easements as required by ' the a~...ig1_'a.;`:ic:'.:?tr depth, ° n d ~ x,a i storage capacity o f a l l required public utilities and streets located beyond the bouI:S.caries of this platy, o outside o dedicated public right-of-way as Y]t?C;'c`'.":aary to service this cdevelopmento This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and to orary slope easements for ultimate development of ad._tacent roach<naiyn as required by the appropriate Jurisdictional agency. 4~ This a e 4y e .d_ o'e.'..m e rat shall dedicate adequate drainage and pond i"g easements to incorporate the r°equzx ed high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C, Plans and Specifications d.~ All public streets and utilities z1ece sSaC°y to provide service to this development sra , 1 be de gried by a r°_eg st:;red professional engineer in accordance with City codes and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2m A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, -and sediment control plan must be prepared in accoriance with current City standards and appro e by staff prior to final plat approval, 3, This development shall insure that ~ all t;cspCu°Y°y .7 fc'diCc ~'T'i.. ~ `d public streets shall have a cul-cle-sac constructed in accordance with Cite engineering standards. A detailed lan dscz'ipe plan shall- be submitted -on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval, The f 1n3.r1 :ra l quc`ar-3Izi ee shall We included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date o in ts"ad.d_<stIon. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO m All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within they required right-of-way in accordance with City design sta'ndas.r_ d s~ DPublic Improvements 1~ if ,tnypublic lic improvements are t be b instal-led must be under Ci4 y !1contract, ty~.~ t + 5 e appropriate pd_o j e c€._ bV.,.~ a}-tr-S o 4~ a.. d by Council :=aaFtzosb prior to final plat approval, E, Permits This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of al regulatory agency permits in the t Mite frame required by the affected agency, F. Parks Dedication 4 ® This development shall fu~~ful.din its 1parks dedication requirements as recommended b the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission and ppr,irv_ed by Council action, G. Other 1~ All, standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council aetions i d isory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised. STANDARD ,_S„ 2 ,3t ,X i SITE M a h J CK ZONING . t a 1_- Li -i, -i----~- LAP-*U Ind- - \ r_1 Q i w a n 63A St rll Ina/r'~y Grading plan " s T'1 e YORKTC) SOUTH 589r.a'M / -562 COUNTY _ _ s Z :HIGHWAY 902.76 NQ A P'. i. m _ aso. CITY OF EAGAN - COUNTY OF DAKOTA s DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY to..♦nclnn me East 114 comer of S.c tiers :'nl rEeen (i3L :n*,>+~ip N.rner as A w n (2'IC ♦ a is '.n e.es oath 515.4 sat. ne Swc,. ( S8 I I~ e°s~r44 iai6pii.i i~r~ ir:nr lip. a tnr artrrr♦an .iL > is r. H.m1, \ ` l'~ ~ j- ~,f i~ / z) j -z12. i0 ~y(~' ~ il~4cf ee ucoc rrsm.cheaLierirlaa of>s iGaffl3Pv»r 55.6 n. h1L,.+♦r 2.8'1 fre: LM > u Iin♦ , .'l 1 J i ` ' I t H of th♦ a'E} et SE= o: p S<ctla9 13. thmc• £,♦i 624.5 f♦r< to i,e e,rt 23ne / I~ ( C,J~ tJ 4 er >,ee .ra .,an, mm<♦ nor.n S 13 re.a point mf b s:n„v.e. A ~h. r °V A A i~~ i f / + Tur n♦ree[. tnL G<ac rl OeE :aa panels accorp Sne to .h♦rGOV<rnr,♦nt r> ~ per. ~ F~~~ 'f to r . ♦ r Jos f arm E„i 1l4 maw et s u. s 1-~ - i I CuY .I un ie zw. 3. :~ui.z i.. ~nrr lnz rses• cY. a. 1 11 .1~ _ _ '1 a n Jlo tar t c zu z m,~c sovu 305.4 Aa. a tn.hr 6 _ ~-`+i 3e5 tn6 + ♦ yo lot ]1S 5 tart ,oath ♦M 5]JyT tart wat'af 4` Z rv~ enc. Sovtn 6l` tb \ - \ l; > C•ac < roof Seccto 13. te..n,niD 17 a♦n a > 2 Tmk ~3;J 50 : 'sr erl. tt Lnt mt ltn♦ ~eh.•a 49, r Ear y _ - ~ N~1 - ~ I 'fir NS r w an u G 1syh oC6v Tin♦ f<~ n n 5 3 , F' , 63' ~a£.s tr355r '.Ec r me. So.~v,r25•LYOFs °4W f t ~ 63 r 40 vr♦6`3o t<e a tnelpoinx of brL-nn ♦IS'1n Caaov ..osncy~ninnSezo a. ` ` \ `I J _ f'f •d .point on ch♦ L li . r srr n 13. V A f{ 1 Alas tns ereir_,t,e hi nn . zJ v :,la >ai : ar 6>~a r.< lie 13, A y / a 1 so~m Alp - v lima ♦f18ec ♦nlefc 89' pi♦:♦n<e m>[ ♦!e 'ar+,'.en^er3 ine oow<'\ c \ ^ ~I~ o ♦L6J.Sh. ro. I♦ ~v,fl t ♦ v,m ee6tl r< ne of sett « \ ~ ~ \ ~ `y4 \ ~ i ~ aie~♦me ce eri lne o rl< ord 902.5 tae. to v,♦ .51 M,1 vr~ co r i xo a ctt t'nnav G ® cast an 2r of 34° 23 tom n„ ♦.~p - v♦ R isava ~1 ~ 't^ ♦1 v42h .h a>6 11nr of srie 5♦e*.:ona13. :n aloof Bale \ ~ ,4, ~ b' - A ° ! 1_r EseL Sloe to ehe pointrot DeStviin`, eont,lerAnt 1.YY m<re>, more mr lees. - li 58 sabJra riq,u aa~ra b ♦ scar ar r > \ -o ~ ~~i I " ~ rear ~ ~ ~ a tore i `~,.nho .npn, ♦>r. r .e arinn rn. >or ? n ut. as a to th. amx N wra> mf mra.. caw - 1.. 1950 9 oa ,.n. o . ias`;' ~ \ ~ ,1~ 1 . tC♦a. >cr So4 to - 2 ♦♦56 S.np♦ b♦'n~np n ro ,>r ra °anee,n>t:onJ;aocer t .lle I.P. 093e oa (se_1 goifi ~nnth ~ 1~ ~ ~ > em _ for ?ens r-nrn: of F . t thr Scmte of .`Ilnvrrsat. in anc♦rnr5 m, to 'hr - / t ~ - <orrsn ttl eV <mrnt 6 ♦.ces> r..hem. ~ r ~ o~ NORTH OWNER E DEVELOPER V Yorkton Development 1690 Uni.erztty Arenne, St. P-I. SS.K' 55104 ',A 1 '4 a I w~ i dig ~io' or Yae~Tan LTD 1- (612} 484 4000 vIIZ~ 4 .I f al ZI av~, 14 . , ' i Scale nch I . ICO feet - ~ 3 I M I e v m mm » SCALE IN r FEET i l' osn _ ~ ~ , t XX -T \ 1 , ~1 ! E. G. RUD S SONS, INC { LAND SURVEYORS 9560 Lexington Avenue North Circle Pines, Minnesota 59014 LOCATION MAP T.I.ph.-- W2) 786-5596 ~I m ~ ` Ary 10 t p O S € -C , ~ _ -v 111 ~r ~ ~ ~ '•r~Y\ ~u1 1 - q - ~ ~ I ape ~ m r pre '44 s W i ,p t v J r , i , \ •I A, ~n ` 1 var,hl 1 L 7Y : y. Hit^iNwAY `JNO 63 0 ~n ~ z cr m _ m 4 tit t>t a ~ ~ U' O s GRADING And I Far: YORKTON DEVELOPMENT..' 1. e( S k'a.v 1 Y r. Scal Yom: J / 1 1 s I. ~ f I ~ ~ ; J j /44 ~ J ~~~1 ass' - 7 \ t e ! i 1 +G k. s i T~ , i I s I ` 1 ' Pr~posd F~:.E.- 89q' ~V { I ASS'- C71 C i i 'ter f i J t ~ 'i I ' tT ~i t I <..c.a 04.2 For- 5ry'. r.14-- 6~ t , .G.Y.n. VasttoaA Dxtur. ^CwtouvS 2.----»Denataa 4x1tting.2 foot J 1. Danoces pxopaacd 1 Cast: cpaarnxg*. 1. panataa px®poscd alivxtiot`n, . °3. 9o0 -Dmotat axisting aAsvaaiau `s b. v-. Danotas pzopoaad disaetim oL dzsix n Jt7 ? Cfu Land Surveyors,:- 4560 L-intioo Aveseu® Nortkt Cfrilgt ~ rep `r~ i FLkf? IO (-G N tL.cc.< NJkN J TI I I l3 " ~ 3'1kcK NlAwl-'t S 4r f tz- t'~ ys 1`' t i Q Q L 11C'ir_-CaP~ ~`~AN L,AND5CAPE SCNEDULE mv. tic 1 t-Ytoq NCfES k -~i:d"Par;,.rlf..N U.~r„w x,c L,.~t,A.c1c r~1t..A.S ~J t)4.~ neB PJ' 6w11 VOL, L, -`ear rg? w~ ~ ; 1 g'a'C 6 Ei a 1 wmea ~!a N\A2t~A4L<S£.E1.1 Q4N ~cw p AJLC.N Li 12^ - .u f~RAPtUS e~ r a a ,u wood ~ o - sT 5 71 CONC,, GUft~ ;AUV ew~~ t~. ~L-c.o.;c, CLI~e Pt A? CONC.CURB - L CC7NC, CURB/u _F( P- ~ JA ~Pe rx,reo _ a 1. LANDSCAPE LtJNTRAITOR SHALL -IT SITE TD BEC(k4: COMP(tTELY tA.[[IAR WITH SITE ( NDITr.: " 4lTTtK p A!j C.Fifb {.J IZ» f \\\1 F V LI E o .JOPR ' NU Pt.A NTZ`iC. WILD BE IN 2ALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CYJN- ~'LRI;CTI N HAS GEEN (-P LD IN TIIE I:{MEDIATE AREA, 3 ALL PIANO MATt'. RIAIS -AID, : PLY NI'PIt THE tATLST EDITION 1F HE AMEI t1 AN -1 ARIil'R N . LRY STIK X, -RICAN AIATI ti B trt' Ni H.~E RI MIN. , t Ir•t i. (7fwD~4 f t S I 5~4:hS 1A--D F"I'll NItL BE iNSTAf.4k:ll iti3t>i':N ALL 'PNT D AND 'it"S I 'iIAT ARE ISDIATED MR<t GROUND l)VER ARk ANU ul L ~ ( Ki 1A"/ 2t ltx ~ _ -ENERAL SID, Ll B MASSES, t C!b CDNC BLK. > 5, ALL AREAS NHERE SOO AND Kr K MUt.CH 'It]UCN SIIIWI HAVE VALLEY t--~---- '~-'Y7-~ V!L'N P[.ASTIC ELtiEk OR EQUAL. I , ~ _ Q 9EE ~1'ki1Q. N `.3. 1 w 6. SOD SHALL BE CULTURED KEMTYKKY BLUEGRASS FREE OF WEEDS AND CI..tIHP. LANDSCAPE IUNTRAC ,M WILL WATER AT TINE OF INSTAL- LATION. ALL SWPES GRlATER THAT J TD A SHALL BE STAKED. ENTRY V tl^ M ANY SLIDING OF SCD SHALL BE REPLACED BY LANDSCAPE C>NPRACTY)R. PLAN (9 ENTRY STOOP , 7, ALL DISTRUBE, AREAS T DR SODDED. Y, x /4A-1^" WI SECT-. L.- ROCK NUG^H BMA rNTENRNCE STRIP NITN HtAQ POLY BE WN. V H drawn I) y K.A f Dlr. date I 1 revisions A i a 3 U '7110 IF "i 1 JI ' A 0TYP ILI U~ v Prou.ns K ztb Q; (_owA c=~ se aR~~ 24371 ~I I ~ f u f~~ / ®a c ,1 Ci+ a v~ 6~a~ss G lo' . to o" q1 SITE PLAN _ v N Y. N GENERAL NOTES HTILIT( LEGGN7) 2e z_ o O S ~a~IrAa r Sel Kz px C O D E R E V I E W NA70RAL G.AS h rn'ya FLA- OFFICE A.YD WAREF IM BAULDTNG t '[E LPPNONE t , a~ MOP OCC1PhvCY: FI - 2 CYE45TFR%°fI0N TYPE: $ - N ~ Cgu~,Z Cara a e,UrZl~r~ E:EGTlzica.~ X'l OFFICE AREA IST FljXR: 3,529 SF OFFICE AREA 2ND FTfXN2: 3,581 Sf jA7(lO WAREK)USE AREA ISr FL": 27,371 SF' 4 PER 0-1 WWAROK)lLSE AREA 2ND Fl": 7,519 SF Kffy Q CSS SF: 36,000 SF SITE: 102,1,,2 ALLOWABLE AREA: 12,000 SF ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASES:eiemrance ®11sid100% 27,OOO SF C-rlG£' '711c> ~URB RAO-L''.i - It ' Svr" 300% = 72,000 SF Irtaa~riv.ISE araC,l asi- 317V So.rT: BUILDING OOHS itXTIO.\: i x FO(-:: CU\rR rE P LAN 1 GA2^s F1fX)R5: (XNCTtETE TGJIA,L F'.aRKIndG: tp2 EYfIR I(YZ WALES: F42£C,YST h'At1. P:L\'EIS AND GL.Y.SS R;OF: STEEL DEN A.ND SINGLE MY ROOFING ~i =CCx1T?X\C'1' LOAD: 6,985 \iT SF OFFICE AT 100 SF 70 SWEET ` t f BASED (1\ NET AREA 28,534 NEC SF W.*M01.SE AT = 95 IN aE.( / , E--°I VIAL OMJAA` 165 , {2fL'~'._'LAj ,',1 `4T'_': SUET, 511E /L~.h1O5G p.PE °LALIS ' A2 GRcO':ntG ~ GRAinNAC=E ~'.~,l.i ,I 1 3 EI(2C>T FLG?~Z P A~ 4IEGNTS 4 ~E2Za E=U2.P_A !-RE~'_°-GtE7GLCi?iA1.1 ~F 41 5 :F LE ✓4^'~P~.1S Q ~ a z 4 09 M, F; JIS,. /DoD2 SG EOJ~S; ~°TnILZ V ACY A,, 'Al c T~lti VlA?,k. yT~l.~ tilt-ILA _ t°AVINCa O (Qr~^ t~-I^µ L'y,7UM1NG>I.ri Ll C7NT `~'t~T t f(a12S Q 5 ~ lea"MIG~A~.LTJ`MG J4 C1 t~ Y LI.ASy P-~PSG.`- 0.Y g Q 2 4 Y~24 I z' 3T MINOUS 0.~y 119 GLG 6 C~F+>E.. `,MY SUMMARY OF CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 Chapter one outlines the general provisions and definitions applicable to the entire City Code, including penalties for violations. Section 1.02 definitions: Subd. 8 defines "public property", which includes parks, in the CHAPTER 2 Chapter two covers administration and general government. It outlin:,, the authority and purpose of the codes, establishes certain key positio-113 and delineates the organization of City departments. Section 2.3arks and recreation d~_r~ i+ - This section establishes this department and the position of Director and outlines his responsibilities. Section 2.50 Advisor Commissions and committees in eneral This section covers the appointment of members, terms of office, basis of removal, residence requirements, ex-officio members, any the positions of chairpersons and secretary. Section 2.52 Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission Subdivision one establishes the Commission of ten members who serve str Bred three year terms, and designates the Director of Parks and Re r,~a ._c,a Department as an ex-officio member. Subd. 2 This outlines the powers'' and duties of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. CHAPTER 3 Chapter three defines municipal and public utilities rules and a , rates, charges, and collections. Section 3.02 - fixin rates and char es for munioi al utilities Rates and charges are adopted by resolution. 1 Section 3.05 - rules & re ulations re.af to municipal utilities Subd. 7 - unlawful acts: A. Discusses willful or careless breaking or damage of buildings and equipment, etc. Section 3.60 Subd. 2 re: street 1--h`s in parks Information on page 49. CHAPTER 4 Chapter four consists of construction licensing, permits, and regulations, including signs, excavations and mobile home parks. Section 4.30 - excavat3_vin7 & fills Subd. 2. -permit re ~1 % :°ed ( unlawful act A. Permit required to remove, store, excavate, fill, or raise surface grade. B. Exceptions: 1. When building permit is also required 2. State, County, City highways 3. Curb cuts, utility hook-ups or .tr penings, unless no is required 4. Installation o public utilities if on property platted withi_t 2 years 5. Excavation of less than 10,000 sq. ft., or less than 5' deep Subd. 3 - application B. Application for permit shall include: 1. Legal description of land 2. Name, address, and signatures of applicants and owner 3. Copies of any agreements between owner and any other person 4. Estimated time to complete 5. Roads on which material is hauled 6. Method and schedule for restoration and measure to control erosion during and after work 7. 2' foot contour nap 8. Additional information required: o landscape plan o access roads' o dust control methods o hours of operation o security o access control measures o weed control 2 Subd. 4 - annual license fee C. In addition to permit fee, petitioner shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by the City for review and inspection. Subd. 5 - regulations & requirements The following restrictions shall apply: D. Screening: Where required to eliminate unsightly views, two rows of 6' fast growing trees. E. Maximum slopes - ratio of 1:1 K. Paving access roads - All access roads to a public oadwa~ _ be paved for 75' to eliminate spillage and minimize & Q. Restoration - Shall provide topsoil, shall be reseeded with approved plan and time schedule. Subd. 6 - granting of permit Before or after granting a permit, Council may require: D. reimburse City for periodic inspections E. post a surety bond F. post a performance bond G. provide a certificate of insurance Subd. 7 - inspections Each site shall be inspected at least once a year. Subd. 11 - violations A. Failure to comply, project may be enjoined from further work. Section 4.30 Regarding excavation/erosion (page 70-76) Section 4.40 Subd. 4.K re: recreation areas in "trailer coaeh ark" Information on page 80. Section.4.40 - construction & maintenance of trailer coach _parks Subd. 4. - trailer coach construction, d,-.,7,1 <n K. Recreation area: 15% of total art~a established and as recreation area of approved design. T. Lot landscaping shall be sodded and maintained with grass. 3 CHAPTER 5 Chapter 5 consists of beer, wine, and liquor licensing. Section 5.01 Definition of alcoholic beverage, beer, liquor. Section 5.16 Consumption and possession of alcoholic beverages on public property. Section 5.3 Temporary beer license.' CHAPTER 6 Chapter 6 refers to Other Business Regulations and Licensing. None 4JT TIIM 7 CHAPTER Section 6 Subd. 3' D.5. Information on page 195• Section 99 Subd. 1. Same as 7.99 When reviewing chapters, seven and eight of the City Code as it rel '.s to function of the Parks and Recreation Department, the following to my attention: Chapter 7.08, page 179 - regulation of grass, weeds, and trees% Some provision should be provided to exempt park property designated by the Director of Parks and Recreation as undeveloped national parkland from conforming to this ordinance. CHAPTER 9 Section 5 - parking regulai:'ny This chapter contains general parking information with little oori;<°c,ing parks. About the closest thing to us is the fact that the City retains the right to say where it is legal or not to park. 4 CHAPTER 10 This chapter is on public protection. It contains much concerning parks and trees. Section 10.20 - Section 10.21 Deals with the duties of the City forester, diseased trees, and control of the diseases. Section 10.22 This regulates the planting and protection of trees in new subdivisions. This provides for: o preserving all adequate sized trees, if possible. o replacement of any adequate tree that is removed C firing o replanting to be done along with approved land_ plan (no,; 1 112). o trees preserved in right-of-ways. o no dead trees, stumps left after development. o performance bond or cash escrow paid by developer. o required information - a planting plan of same scale as preliminary plat submitted at time of preliminary plat includes: 1. The specific name, size and location of every proposed, m-", existing, preservable tree. 2. The distance in feet between trees in any one row. 3. The nature of existing soil in the planting scale to a depth of 31. Conditions for tree planting: This part informs the developer how and what to plant. Section 10.23 This section gives general rules and regulations fo° n,-Irk use (i.e., don't litter, etc.) Section 10.24 - water regulations This covers boats, docks, rafts, and motors The rest of the chapter is on various regulations, such ~paraphernalia, fire alarms and general do's and don'ts k oriented. CHAPTER 11 Chapter 11 defines land use regulations (zoning). Section 11.01 - intent and purpose Includes promoting orderly development of residential, re~~r arxal, =71~i public areas, etc. 5 Section 11.03 - definitions Commission - the Planning Commission of the City (Is it necessary for Park and Recreation Commission to be inclc` Section 11 .10 - general provis3,~r~_ Subd. 6 - re aired ,yards and o space Subd. 13. - re uired of,f street parkin A. Single family - 2 B. Duplex - 4 C. Multiple 1. owned units: l outdoor and 1 garage space/unit. 2. rented units: 1-112 outdoor and 1 garage space/unit. D. motel - 1 space/unit and 1 additional space/8 units additional spaces for liquor establishment and resturants. B. churches, clubs - 1'for each 3-112 seats based on design capacity. F. hospital - 1-1/2 per bed. G. rest home - 1 for each 6 beds plus 1 for each 15 beds. H. medical & dental clinics - 3 per staff doctor or 1 for each 150 sq. ft. of floor space, (whichever is higher). I. theater - 1 for each 3 seats. J. drive-in restaurant- based on experience. K. bowling alley - 5 for each lane, additional for restaurant. L. gas station - 4 plus 2 for each service stall. M. retail store - 1 for each 150 sq. ft. up to 20,000 sq.ft. plus 1 for eac"fn 200 sq.ft. above 20,000 sq. ft. N. restaurants, bars -1 for each 3 seats. 0. banks - 1 for each 250 sq. ft. Plus 5 stacking stalls for each drive up stall. P. offices - 1 for each 150 sq. ft. of leasable space. Q. furniture store, warehouses - 1 for each 400 sq. ft. R. manufacturing - established by expez __.10r~ (L:' so we z' a~~~_en reviewing developments . Most of tlzu standar(' , appear r,_:as4 CDT,-; ';;.rcpt for warehouse of 1/400 sq. ft. seems too high.) 6 Subd. 15 - landsea ing A. Approved landscape 'plan required. B. May require bond for one (1) year. Subd. 17 - open sales Pots A. Landscaping required - for 20 feet from street right-of-way. Subd. 24 - deli n & construction re uirements for multi le dwellings (R3 B. Site design and development requirements 1. Landscaping (Should refer to policy) 9. Natural features Shall show due regard to trees, water, historic are<,_, etc. 12. Shall have recreational area of 200 sq. ft. for ~_t, un_w c,A' _r less bedrooms, 300 sq. ft. for each unit with three -r mor-> ~ . Must be at least 100' from a ponding area. Subd. 28 - Dint parkin- facilities' A. Discusses shared use of parking facilitites of different hours of operation for different business uses involved. Sections 11.21 - shoreland zoning /Subd. 2. - definitions' 8. Ordinary high water mark (OHWM) Commonly that point where natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominately terrestial. 12. Protected water As defined in Minnesota statues 1980, Section 105.37, Subdivision 14. No lake, pond,etc., of less than 10 acres should be covered by these regulations. 14. Shoreland Defined as land within 1,000' of the OHWM of a 1a~~^, or 300" from a river or stream. Subd. 3 - designation of types of land use A. Protected waters (Listed on page 319.3) 7 Subd. 4. - generalprovisions A. Indicates lot size, lot width, structure setback from OH , 6,-.uc+;ure setback from OH ,'structure height limitations. I. Water Quality Management Plan Subd. 5. - shoreland alterations A. Removal of natural vegetation is restricted to prevent B. Grading and filling in shoreland areas must have excavate-:: . Permit granted subject to conditions that: o smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for shortest o temporary ground cover is used and permanent cover is i_',lished. o methods are usedto prevent erosion and trap sediment. CHAPTER 11 Section. 11.01 Subd. 3 re: romoting orderly develo ment of reerea ub11 Information on page 264. Section 11.10 Subd. 6 re: re aired ards and on s ace whenever a ark or la tb r a public or railroad right of way Section 11.10 Subd. 15. re: landsea in, (^-,?neral development) Information on page 279. Section 11.10 Subd. 24,B9 re: natural features 2rotection) thr~u r ,_r re~uirments far multiply dwellings _ Information found on page 284. Section 11.20 Subd. 3 A5 Re: ermitt d land uses in a ricultural zoned ?_-m Information found on page 288. Section 11.20 Subd. 7 re: "P" ublie facilities district Information on page 294. Section 11.20 8 Subd. 15.B,3C re: ma num required reen space for built _ 3 sto r._r Information on page 310. Section 11.29 re: shoreland zoning Information on page 319 - 319114 Section 11.40 Subd. 6.B4 re: fanned dsvslo meat arks & sdsstrian circulation Information on page 328. Section 11.40 Subd. 6.f 2C re: planned dew^?,, - dedication requirements Information on page 329. Section 11.80 Subd. 4.A3 re: ermined uses within flood lain district Information on page 333. CHAPTER 12 No material under this !listing. CHAPTER 13 Section 13.01 Subd. 6. re: platting to provide adequate arks la rounds recreation etc Information on page 371. Subd. 10. rs: revsnt the ollution of air stream onds Subd. 11. re: reserve the natural besot and to o ra,„^.. Section 13.04 Subd. 76. re: definitions of "trailnz Information on page 379. Section 13.10 Subd. 5,A,5 re: finallat - parks dedication Information on page 382. Section 13.10 9 Subd. 5 B 4. re: information with final tat -easement or deeds rf°~, y Citj for trailways, arks etc. Section 13.11.8 Public uses Section 13.11.10 Public and park spaces' Section 13.11.11 Vegetation Section 13.11.13 Environmental protection Section 13.20 Subd. B;A. re: general provisions-pubic recreation areas,etc. dedication Information on page 387 Section 13.30 Subd. 6.G re: trails or pedestrian ways on final plat. Information on page 400. Section 13.30 Subd. 10. re: public and ark spaces, data and design standards Information on page 401. 10