11/03/1987 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission
1
A l€
n - ,
1"F
has r
e vv
on
uliax.
L
A.
a o -
V4 a. 1 n
4
a
17
is ca _
NT
O
o tl City
Idition
p a tY'
i trail
I lat b9 to
t tri ) trai'
3. C c e ° '.l 3rd
pC5
1
f
r
al
•y Cou G Len
1. Parks Dedication of Cutlet B., and th
2.
3.
11 1 f > y
4. T} r l
2
Cliff I
T f
ty (40)
6u ey 1r
C
3
4- 1-
ed
_'or Oc
r0
avo
C C s
H
lear
DI ! CIT
1 Advi C
Sy
Mi v a Awed for th
'al ly
r
HE
t3
t(
i
C
5
4- he
i
^ P9
1 e
1 _
b
of
due t
T that the
Mr.
i1
d pr
5 of Aug t 1st
11:!5 P
Date ti
7
A. Pr plat of
° the Cedar ua
t to
c = ition P--li.oy for
2.
Ni- 2nd A
A. y 11 .35 a
to a >r
ADVISORY PARKS "C_: Tlv CC
:4: K F__ V--' i'Im JF PARKS T_
3, 7
R : FIRE STATION #5
Cit t t
c is to be
Si
, r a
action at
KVI js
CC: Tc , Cia
Ke L, Fir
r'fj
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BE A bLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VIC ELLISON
THEODOPF WACHTER
n -R
September 30, 1987 T,
71vi
GEORGE SCHENCK
1925 BERKSHIRE DRIVE
EAGAN MN 55122
Re: Proposed Construction of Fire Station #5
Dear Mr. Schenck:
The City has acquired the Lydia Schindeldecker property and is
planning to proceed with the construction of Fire Station #5 on
the site. Plans for site development and Fire Station #5 will be
reviewed during this winter with construction occurring in the
spring/summer of 1988.
At the August 6, 1987 neighborhood meeting, Mayor Fire
Chief Southorn and I stated the reasons why the Schi, 1 ecker
property was selected for the future site of Fire Stati 5. At
that meeting, a request was made to consider another sick t $-'-1e
intersection of Galaxie and Cliff. These sites were revs--r:_,: 'ay
our Fire Department and the City Council, however, it was
determined by both that the Schindeldecker property was best
suited to meet the criteria desirable for a neighborhood fire
station.
There is also a desire expressed by several neighbors on
Berkshire Drive that if the fire station is located on the
Schindeldecker property that the west portion of that property
remain in a park like setting. It is a City policy that
neighborhood parks have a minimum of ten (10) acres to be
designated as an active neighborhood parkland. However, as
stated at the August 6 meeting, the City will further review and
consider a possible exception for this property, realizing there
is no active playground area west of Galaxie Road. Any parkland
development would contain limited playground equipment and for
all practical purposes be maintained as a passive parkland araa.
This item will be reviewed by our Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission and City Council in the near future.
THE LONE OAK TREE -THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GRO H IN OUR
Fire Station #5
September 30, 1987
Page Two
It is the intention of this office and Fire Chief Southorn that
we keep the local neighborhood informed of any and all plans for
the development of the fire station as we proceed with this
project during the next several months. The City is site
sensitive and will do everything possible to preserve the
existing integrity of the neighborhood.
Sin rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief
Bea Blomquist, Mayor
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
TLH/jeh
' CTOR Of t ® Cu:
2. 1
3.
l~ tit
2m
3e
hies s
in
q, 1 platted prior t) 2.02
1 , would
f
A ._l
2
---aj T0: ADVISORY ~ *S & RECREATION COMMISSION
FRO : KE ',A, DIRECTOR OF PARKS
DATE: Po 3, 1987
az J'ICE MANAGEMENT PF.;'
to
Al
t( KV/js
SCHEDULE
PARKS CMAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
87 E3 89
,ECT TASK NOV. DEC. 7 a FEB. MAR. APR. Y. JUN. J UL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. B. R. APR.
Council/Commission Review 1111111141111H111,11111
aission Statement 11/1
rogram Issues I!!1 1!!1 /lll if/1
Goals Identification 1111 /111 1//I
arksite/use Inventory
111111111 1!!1 !/I/ ll/l 1/!! IIf!
lassification Mode Devl•
rode Application 1/111' !/1
Task/Quality Indicators ~ I!/!I !fl !!!1 lf!
aintenance/Oper. Schedule !11 !!1!
erformance Standards 1/!! /11/'/1!1
Procedure Manuals-
As Built Plans !!!!l!!! 1!!1/1/ I/1! I1!!! II1 111/! I!!
5/10 Yr. Replacement Pr gm. omputerization !1/ /Ill 1/11 11/1 I/I/ /I/11 1/1 1111 !1! 11/.11// 1111/111/f/1!
Maintenance Impact Model f!!! !1/1
ost Mgmt. Implementation !f!!f
PARKSITE/USE INVENTORY
A. Classification Scheme
- Example -
e
Park Primary Class Secondary Class Total UsablereaDe
vl.
Goat Hill Comm. Ath. Fields Special Use 22.8 18.4
Cedar Pond Comm. Park Mini Park 7.7 3.9
3.9 0.0
Highview Neighborhood -
B. Facilities Inventory
- Example -
Facilities
Park Tennis Baseball Hceke Pleas.Rink Shelter F'i i.t B11 1,,,;
Goat Hill 2 2 1 Multi-Use 1
i~Q
Cedar Pond 1
Highview 1 1 1 600,
C. User Inventory
- Example -
Park Primary Activities Use Levels Prof air.g F n cio
Goat Hill Baseball M Eagan blue T
Play Unit L/M
Hockey H General Use
Hockey - Youth L Practice
Pleasure Skate M-H General Use
L Speed Skate
TURF MANAGEMENT
A system designed for prescribing specific levels of cultural t:re sen:
turf to achieve desired goals based upon the intensity of uE lie
visibility, and aesthetic considerations.
Mode I
Premium quality turf managed under a program of intense cultural i,r ea terries is ,
Turf areas subjected to frequent and intense levels of use throughout a
majority of the growing season. Commonly associated with athletic field sites
programmed for organized sports. Turf height maintained with a reel mower to
minimize damage to leaf blades and establish a uniform grain (1 1/2 -
height). Irrigated sites normally mowed once every three. to five days; son-
irrigated sites, once per week. Minimum of three fertilizer f1 ica -i.onr:. Per
year. Soil aerified minimum of three time: per year to reduce cor par't~cr .
Topdressing performed as frequently as once per year to maintain meeuth turf
grade. Overseeding or sodding performed annually to re-establish uniform turf
cover on worn areas. Pre-emergent and broadleaf herbicide applications
conducted annually to maintain weeds at less than one percent cover. Turf may
require periodic dethatching.
Mode II
High quality turf managed under a program of moderate to in tense Mural
treatments. Turf areas generally subjected to moderate levels o" and
often associated with high public visibility sites such as mu: cipal
buildings, community centers, arboretums, cultural facilities, and other
special use sites. Turf height normally maintained with a reel mower on a
five to seven day frequency. Trimming and edging performed with each mowing.
Entire sites or portions thereof may be irrigated. Minimum of two fertilizer
applications per year. Aerfication normally performs-d only in areas subjected
to intensive foot traffic. Topdressing and overs, c `d-LIILQ' con a Led as
required by soil compaction and turf wear. P? -dcmr r of and b oadlead
herbicide applications made once per year to maintain weed populu.Lion at a
minimal level.
Mode III
Moderate to high-quality turf managed under a program of balanced cultural
treatments. Turf areas subjected to use levels ranging, from moderate
visitation to areas of intense usage. Commonly associated with the broadest
range of park and recreation areas including tot lots, rei;hhorhood perks , and,
community parks. Mowing normally conducted with a rotary type mower at a
frequency of seven to ten days. Mowing height 2 - 2 1/2 inches with some
grass clippings visible. One or two fertilizer applications wade per year,
usually during fall months. Core aerification of soil generally not required,
but may be made in conjunction with overseeding or sodding in degradat<ed turf
areas. Topdressing seldomly performed. Herbicide application mad In f;111
to control broadleaf weeds at a moderately acceptable level.
TURF MANAGEMENT
PAGE 2,
Mode IV
Low to moderate quality turf managed under a program of min r~j.l cultur°?.
treatments. Turf areas generally not subject to direct public, ccc and m,
commonly occurring along boulevards, internal trailways or in maarginal
of larger parks. Mowing conducted an average of once per two weeks. Height
of turf at mowing may exceed four inches. Grass clippings are commonly
visible and may blow onto adjoining surfaces, e.g. trails. Cultural
treatments such as aerification, topdressing, and weed spraying, not normally
practiced. Overseeding/sodding practices are utilized only to the point of
controlling erosion or minimizing public hazards. Concentration of weeds may
be moderate to high.
Mode V
Low quality grassy areas not maintained for outdoor recreation use. Generally
mowed to a rough quality level only once or twice per year for the purpose of
controlling noxious weeds, maintaining pedestrian visibility, or reducing
grass fire potential. Mode V areas may include certain easements, open space
areas, or marginal components of community-type parks. Includes prairies
subjected to controlled management berms,
Mode VI
All other areas, as determined by policy, where ground cover shall be left in
a non-maintained (natural) condition. Examples include wooded areas, open
spaces, green belts, wetlands, interpretive areas, and community preserves.
TURF MAINT;, ' 'try.
TASK
Mode Mowing Frequency Irrigation Fertilization Weed Control Aerification Topdressing OverSeeding
I 3 - 5 days (irrigated) Common 3/year Pre-emerge/ 3/year
1/year As required
broadleaf
II 5 - 7 days Selected Areas 2 /year Pre-emerge/ As required - As required
broadleaf
III 7 - 10 days _ 1 _ 2 /year Broadleaf As required
IV 10 - 14 days
V 2 - 3/year
VI
- indicates a function not normally associated with the level of maintenance indicated.
TURF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Classification/Park Mode
Community Athletic Fields I II III IV V VI
Goat Hill
Northview
Rahn
Ohmann
Lex/Diffley
Community Parks
Cedar Pond
Blackhawk
Patrick Eagan
Thomas Lake
Trapp Farm
Neighborhood Parks
Burr Oaks
Lexington
Country Home
Evergreen
Bridle Ridge
Highview
Pilot Knob
Moonshine
Quarry
Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Woodhaven
Carnelian
Meadowlands
River Hills
Winkler Jackson
Vienna Woods
Ridgecliffe
Walden Heights
Well Site
Oak Chase
Walnut Hill
Lakeside
South Oaks
O'Leary
Wescott Station
Special Use Sites
Fish Lake
Carlson Lake
Heine Pond
Mini Parks
Cinnamon Ridge
Peridot Path
Linear Parks
Boulevard Trails
Highline Trail
Berry Patch
Windcrest
Conservancy
Ravine
East Thomas
Ridge cliff Lineal
Government Buildings
Municipal Center
Library
Public Works Building
Utility Plant
Fire Station 1
Fire Station 2
Fire Station 3
Fire Station 4
Fire Station 5
Cliff Reservoir
Booster Station
1987 TURF MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FERTILIZATION ANALYSIS
ATHLETIC SITES MMAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SLPT« OCT.
NORTHVIEW
- softball fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10
- soccer fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10
- General 24-4-12 8-4-24
GOAT HILL
- basdaa].l fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8--1+__2z25-5-10
- General 24-4-12 8-4-24
RAHN
- Softball (new) 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10
- Softball (old) 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10
- General 24-4-12 8-4-24
SPECIAL USE
Cedar Pond 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10
Fish Lake 24-4-12 20-10-1.0
rapp Farm 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10
Walnut Hill 24-4-12 8-4-21 25-5-10
Municipal Center 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10
Library 24-4-12 20-10-10
Fire Admin. 24-4-12 20-10-10
NEIGHBORHOOD
Blackhawk 20-10-10
,
Blue Cross/ Blue S-- 24-4-12
Bur Oaks 24-4-12 20-10-10
Carlson Lake 24-4-12 20-10-10
Carnelian
Cinnamon Rid e 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10
County Home 24-4-12 20-10-10
Ever reen 24-4-12 20-10-1n
Hi hview 24-4-12 20-10-10
Lakeside
®xin ton 24-4-12 20-10-10
Meadowlands 8-4-24 25-5-10
Oak Chase 24-4-12 2f_-1
O' Lear 24-4-12
Peridot Path 24-4-12 20-10-10
MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPT. OCTOBER
Pilot Knob 20-10-10
Quarry 8--fF -24 -9-5-10
Ridgecliff
River hills ~~ry
20
[ So. So. Oaks 8-4-24 25-5-10
Woodhaven
- Beryl -1 20-10-10
- Gold Trail
4-12 8-4-24
OTHER
Firestation #1 24-4-12 20-10-10
Firestation #2 24-4-12 20-10-10
Firestation #3 24-4-12 20-10-10
Public Works Bldg. 20-10-10
Utility Plant 24-4-12 20-10-10
u CJBS soccer 24-4-12 20-10-10
Well Site 24--+-12 20-10-10
1988 - ns.)2
MAINT- ` el
EA{ ECREATI:'; '
PARK F, f ? "t YEAR L g_ i .'tDS. Tp. 1988 Cost 1984 Cost 1990 Cost 1991 Cost 1992 Cost
Blackhawk Trail 75 5C8 540 Overlay 3800
Burr Oaks Trail 74 945 8 840 Overlay 2800
Blue Cross/ Trail 86 960 8 853 Sealcoat 350
Blue Shield
Parking Lot 86 - - 1,250 Sealcoat 500
Tennis Courts(2) 87 120 120 1,600 Color- 4800
coat
Hard Court 87 100 60 666 Color- 2000
coat
Carlson Lake Access 78 235 10 261 Sealcoat 150 Overlay 1800
Hardcourt 78 - - 83 Sealcoat 50 Overlay 600
Carnelian Parking Lot 72 - - 1,159 Patching 87 Over- 8100
lay
Trails 87 655 8 582 Sealcoat 250
Hardcourt 87 80 57 445 Color- 1350
coat
Cedar Pond Trail 74 1874 6 1,250 Overlay 87 Sealcoat 500
Cinnamon Ridge Trail 81 865 4 384 Seal- 200
coat
Hardcourt 87 40 40 178 Color- 550
coat
Country Home Tennis Court(l) 72 120 60 800 Colorcoat 84 Overlay/ 8000
Colorcoat
Evergreen Tennis Court(2) 75 120 108 1,440 Overlay/ 84 Color- 3800 Color- 4300
Coat coat
coat
Hardcourt 75 80 51 453 Overlay/ 87 Color- 1350
Coat coat
Trail 79 826 734 Overlay 5200
Fish Lake Parking Lot 85 - - 1,748 Seal- 700
coat
Goat Hill Parking Lot 85 - - 4,781 Seal- 1900
coat
Trail-Shelter 87 88 10 98 Seal- 50
coat
Trail 85 1467 8 1,304 Seal- 500
coat
Highline Trail Blackhawk-Pilot 79 7994 10 8,882 Sealcoat 87 Over- 62200
lay
Sandstone- 80 5452 10 6,057 Sealcoat 87 Overlay 42400
Blackhawk
~t1
1 TTTT TlTATT UI TT TI)N
t
'ie t
b ithin
Trs.
s hog
r serer
d
2. T
V
T'
could
3e -_l be
4.
t
5. Tare -f the biz n l r
1 ould be d,
A. B.
ectur
i, of joists, wood
Ce
D.
2. x9'8....
a8
b. to buildit area
C.
t
3. The
4m T
1. in the buildi 11 i
a.
b.
d.
e. bCrr
f.
g. s
h. aside or }
2. m oten ( .ted , waste and
1
a.
b.
C.
w _ cxa
d.
e.
1 ,
3. A 1,1 loe l -A I the
b
5.
b. Id I hi--in
11 an
el c hai Ll C?
The Leon
A.
B. T' 1 bs
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
s
ain
J.
K.
N.
0. b
R
9.
A.
B.
04
0®
Lble.
10, a..N 1
m
0~ c L.
B. l
i f_. ID
RC .w
FROND: ' R O~ PC" 'IOC
DATE-. 3, 37
R : PARKS RLC. :"CIO : b . d ,8
`c
nct cii:
e rya: " - f
c DYE Y.
{
in
ion for Sl ,.sb nb~ Park was _d can.
n
b r
b )p
S
F ~e ;d..
B-- Lon
r
0
_CIA. arc
y
I
h
Staf f d,,-
~il as a toed
c led a'
t
T
ind shrubs at Blue
along L
K All
° '.ization work is sc to begin in earl
_ b_,
i , i E >rior paint
f
9 m
or Df
wit aunty Electric
parks.
m ti
V/js
CITY OF 19 G
BJEC : REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, COMPREHENSIVE WIDE
1..AN AMENDMENT, CON!) TTGN °*aT.e USE PERMITS
(E- .GA I)ALS CENTER 9 NDUST:R:I..AL PARK 9TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION
LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 5
EXISTING LNG: .1X qg"~~I (LIGHT & `+,,:5 i 4~ ~~.~x td ~s.S~6..C"l~F T (BEN I BUSINESS)
1Lt.9fi.s r s L~ INDUSTRIAL) L $:°ra_a a s,
DATE OF i N ~ OCTOBER ~ ..Q,.$a L~Sd
DATE OP REPORT: OCTOBER. 20, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION S0.,114MARN: Sepa yt £_s applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of ~ 8,38 L! and Gf 1iv' no a r..o ,i._.. Business
, ' 1ned Development district and d Preliminary Flat 'L of 33.7 a ' s
that includes this P. D. district with the ~a 25.3 L! acres
for the Eagandale Center industrial Park 9th Addition. This piaL
?ii l c~, Az s: 6 industrial/commercial lots located W. the soli th a
" , ° ' ction of Highway _33 and Lone Oak Road adjacent. to the e Bulk
Wail Mai .E. f`.y9 Two Conditional Use Pc'y,..m t. are,
t,t?i.; _ s car'~ for a
pylon n sign and building height in excess of 35'. The janu.:7. _Tt 1987
,
Land Use Plcf i.1 designates Q: h.i w area Light industrial. therefore. an
Ameniment will be necessary,
DENFEL P ENT CONCEPT: tat ni.. ? v` this primarily one?,
' d ~r w =.i'i~ atJ. c~ ~o-:~.L,t~ v ' ~,'sasTc~ Fr* ~ ~ F Y _ rs~ a ~9_'._- _f F_ I ~ f ..~`"Wat°_:;~. ~:t. C7 L} e
c C;Aa
t3`dt? _ -pJsFe, stX"£_t t,_ _ Tdle ":o, J ;u d ,.n1ust 7:._l /C JiCI31: z it iT.__ LanCd'. la,,es
, r .,t.re.1'u. t._ <<at,o a?. t :Ltte C ? t L z s si-ttci 1.=f. r_e o no _i0s,
r
C? T_ , gY;.:f. f.. 3.~ x a 4,~ ~-g~ - C.. a C..3 C'! `t _L.1.t C., L ....:ra
a e appro xi11t.e t:"sae£ai a. -~s i~~17 '
L ~ _ a =:`t`1 :Y_;.al 5.7~'~Enc.~ - -:its oit tlaE_ c-~Z`.1er
of .i_af.nz: Y. a . {ma..~. _ ~ s> n- Lex.:.,i t_.:i cad, 1. z7ir`r - ti` t tie t _i.);_7.' ~ i4 a-h. ttz i...
~..ot~ ~ Gtl x
2.513 aC.. u 52 Ps_. pro os:. zomo ng ie .D woul..t.d coo nr Lots 1 arid.
2, r.:' ock £_an d Lot I_k lock . -i_'he 1.o. s ok' ._ng ;.s ca . akdoWn of t 55 1
t 7.. the 33.7 c e plat,
f 1
r - t i 1.2 C:_n s f . a : 1.i < a' 1 F
(no liquor)
LLot 2 3.+.; 1* -!,iti _,.1 123 3to0111 65, 0100 S«F.
o 3 ..L 4 . 8 A'u a H. a l F_ i: v. l u b o i. z.._ t O O
Tech t.nd st ial 1 0 520,000 S®
B o c }s
Lot 1 3.8 Ac. office or Retail 45,000 LCt 2 _ . _ offi`~_'E` . t}a0t 0 S.t'
is m z- e
`clock
Lot 3 . >_c . Of _ i'c.., oS_` ii777_t_-fi h
r _ . a.- -.i. 5t 0 0 0 S . F
Other than the hotel and _ potential supportive retail ,:-t. use on A Lot 1,
L c,,ci,~ 2, all prop -~td uses are permitted
,proposes to i pla i'v he entire development into marketable
t ~ _ ~
sites subject to Council review or 1i,: building proposal prior t issuance of a building permim
_
The focus of this i '1~ v p _~-1 L will be LY tour story, 12:3 ror` i c, Hampton
.L. ' . tW. 1 _ located adjacent to Highway 35E. Tht >:i F r. _t ..Ic 1?e t hC,:
hotel within this ::Yg,t_:i!._a e Campus. is with _a e _ hD,,_. hotel s,
1 1"a
Compri Hotel was designed with the business traveler m i n d , the
Residence inn for more long r°' accommodations and Lhe Hampton inn
wd i1 pr 1P,a€. 1 f:ort_ term accommodations for concerned traveler.
Hampton inns are division of the .-i.'1 1i Corp )rut*1.,._.. 9. L, s. a
nightly room price l0 the $40 Y"_angen ~.,...E ;js {1_0re are
~.1
El
Hampton inns throughout the country and Usi.) 0110)11) be operable n y
1990, making them the largest hotel chain 111 the country. x :e
continental breakfasts -s r provided at a! 1 Hampton inns, however no
other eating or Liquor services are available.
Co _Le there pro - -tyy o ext for look for Hampton ini_s, cep b...
wilt require the addition of Mick _.or the IY;%1._t_I panels of Qse
z
building r~..! _..711Cj a>1_=_li the stucco like textured surface. The .Sa&>
Pr71170 mansard 00 detail In continued through the entrance canopy
area.
SITE PLAN: f?t__E_ building 011!1 parking setbacks ,,met Code requirements
as well as potential lot coverages for all 6 _o$=, `=a 138 park .1t1
S1 -a,_ 1is are required by Code, for Lhe hotel 12:3 9' wide c~. .
pr-oposeL s however, there 1..;i proof of parking for an additional 116
spaces if necessary. The typical Hampton inn provides one `Lase per
room. No shortage anticipated based upon comparisons with other
metropolitan Octal a and the 9' stall w l d _ 1 at
on±pr Hotel.
The restaurant site , c't;iL7! allow for a 6a000 S.F. family orientM
facility that would ;..:L serve liquor. The 1:3 ;J :1;a i~x roue 'Vert 1
this liJt and hopes to request Council approval in i`1a", s=
control
0 future if the rezoning and platting applications are approved. '~,i 1.i 1.11,E
anticipates the 0 lot oLat to be fully developed in a 3-- 1 year time
period.
AIRPORT NOISE; This site 1s boo . ad in Airport. _4 b$to Zone 4 an.o
therefore subject to N r N (Noise Level Reductions) as monitored by
the Metropolitan Council. Since the con-st.ruction of hotels; is
generally a F of "+'a standard. they } °,~e
tea` 11Cy.~. are . ca permitted use in all 2
zones even closer to the airport subject to an interior `'tiLi. or 20
f' 1b _ sQ The City Inspections Department and, NIOL Council will
review the! plans and specifications 1]u} t 0d Li1 the Pu`."- L opf. a to-
ensure compliance with that requirement.
~ r a
5 1 C- E E
.n a_ s < _ of r _ j , ! . , Kim e'J u rd t _b v i_ .f _ e Wt h . _ ,
_ .x. Ono approve C...__ a g!'ci as .L?£Js3C w
j _ _ tti 7i o, vex"
xoc
Lhe entry 0-)
o`.' : . 1 = u a i w i l l s.. , 2 _a z e only. as will _ 1 . K,i t ~ -3
a M _a 1 for a ir_<<a t s in n__ i ts _'?S .e _.n... f a m Ham, <</7
}
f
i i} a. L-j. n 4 to the v . . , _ .a i.J ..l L c I ) t.< a t. z c n .l t n _ C. 1.. s, 1 nx c
E
s t a f f and a r c consistent with Previously opus, D !_<_y _t .,d plans for the hotel and - taua cx tl t site will be approved as
.3R I)ING/ D3.'I,.AI AGE E . S. 'LOtI CONTROL: 1.L existing 1:. )po' h{ of t 4e
propose~l development r..n Cram _ high sC`? 5 o _e ._t ;"tit of 932 in
> 1
the northeasterly p o r t i o n of p (o . ? KI .r a 0o
3 p,; t , , , 0 a 1- r' y. 861 Q1 corner
s
building elevations of 890 in - portion eascarly of this site to a
1 p< 0._.x first _lo>>_ elevation of tpr_.a'1_„ in 1E_ in Lot 7. p
These proposed 1 _e y_ i ._1 '1 t elevations _ l. i cats coo fill a
The proposed grading plan calls foc qrading beyond the houndary A
the proposed plat. Those z c_.. _ _ 3 i_ r'_, a__.`a _ e,v
the plat Vil require a alope easoment from the affected pz-operty.
The existing storm sewer system on 1-t one c< -oa 'L '_`1 C7 1_r v i ~ ' " t
_ v in a the area 5 _ mi:, r < a lately adjacent the proposed plat, are
-
presently at capacity. No ; ' . . n 0 , _ generated 00 this development will
be c z I (?-o,-_ rj to flow directly i 1. the storm sewer iY Lane Oar;. hem and F,i'_g`o:? Avenue. v,:i! y the street ana boulevard
areas of Lone
MY; o z ~d _ : _ 1..J l_, i 4 % v _ uIe C'13,' .11 _i k\' c~"] - l^ - s i"n into , uL_
n
existing storm sewer systems is respective right-of-ways.
At _ )01.0ii: approximately 100 south of 3 . 11.00 of 1,-, he
'c1 i ] , i, C? "t Avenue oA ._._I es C c'-.)aC
increases -.L'L'oF - r- 70 \_Fa7a At to iC1~.1~1_x that point, the existing flow
into the S rm sewer system 1; approximately F CPS which leaves 20
C-' c` 10b for the proposed development. i . U t F oT d_ ii 7 will M.
required to limit _ hs proposed runoff generated
.11 lv cib_ 20 .,FS, T11 development 1 Cia'.,-.tpc}sLry_3 p1110 _ on Lot T_€
Block 3; Lot 2, Block 1; and Lot 3, Block 1. A detailed analysis of
thes pond i n=y 0 . _ as not performed this time.
An existing 12 storm sewer O force 001 1 which provides the outlet for
o_ DP on the Bu IX M a i l s C presently drains across the sout'l
s1!Jf_, of Lot 3. Block 1. When Lot 4 develops, the existing 12" line
should be p10000 U and drained to Ponad DP-19. Runoff generated by,
not 3 Block 1p is required to be conveyed to Pond DP-19.
r:ie ?i.. '3oa a; storm sewer on Hampton Drive along the :gin out.li:3`3tJr Lv
~ c
FL.,r 'a 3_
side of s~,_ e Block s is riot 1t.q(e L_.e_.z _ . This _ _ ;E.' :'xossea, the
.
4r ~`;L )-1 ~-3 S' a on the Comprehensive Morin,
drainage ;i_ ,
boundaries are ~C_~ ~.FL~tt
Sewer Guide. Time drainage from the e.11 r_,=,1: off of i-35 E will need
be picked i up when Lots 3 and d 4 of Block _ develop. T h i s runoff
w i l l ;;i:.. directed to the southwest into Pond DP-19.
An incomplete erosion and sediment control la-I11 was submitted with,
the -,1_lill rl3.concern 3.
i)I'r__~ ~"i.~-_ plat _ application. The main water quality t~t~;1 0.-
this ` site is the effect the development O i. 1 have on L;_'ba0 Lake.
i s. i o _ t o ~ i s t__ i r 7, : ii o 1 Y'? t o pia r--, MI, i 1 y , a k. F a r , , .1 e s t o r Irt a t c, r w i 1 L ? . r
..i v.iqsi Ponds DP-3 and DP'-19w The nutrient removal efficiencies of
these of i s will teed to be cloy Let: m l 1(0d in, e111 1i _.2a
to L,eM.Ly Lake w i l l not occur as a result
excessive nutrient loading
of the site development.
S e drainage _1;1.r1:(g Con.(t Ct10I and Aria_ to storm s tip,<_...
installation w i l l be to the east along Lone 3?_}t Poogad and to the
southwest .a I (1 1-35E. prop or erosion _ control s ue non! to '
and f too ie LF C.L
tYPILI-VIES:
,
i
lrunK X4;1 ar x''", behnq PKnanKed e_ m kho nq - w ! - .L. main''
Lon. Road, Oak _1L - as side 54 and _xt nj_nn this antar
.r
KnLweon
and Yanka,l Donlin Mai, past at 1-351, am! west of LaxinqMn Av2nnp.
in + s "ice e c; pule n, t *k' r'-L ..1.°r
r , ,c
I.
b-. i eC__.n the proposed L trunk water in Hampton Drive and tile
adequate water servica.
,,arty _ y Sewer seY i ` ,t1 m .I 4a"._ donth is d51>,7_l, i _b_._
t. oa ,_z l y ijO WE L_. a 0n rLnUP. The proposed sanitary
extensions , Drive n i z d YQ17 are
lateral seNar
Me proposea development.
4:.a'laR ax E T S / lA $1 t.<a.x '".'a a., I :aC IU 1- 7',, 'z 10 M^.. i s__ to [)._o t
development shown in two locations. proposed Hampton L s ' H`c.'
on :_~as".' _ _.rl;. The A >t:C._1 W. `C<<t.- .ctA_'., _,a i i ,to_I sit, E~tx'IL.
w i l l be a! !owed full access.
1 v wn Drive _ _ < _ 1 o t o n Way h r e qu,L. n 0 ri -,v!C--,- ys an-,
proposed to ..7 sr_u- vd t''.>' the southerly j. ~p Ee-,F t y e r`~
temporary cu ry, ac will b required to be constructed at the south
end of Hampton Drive.
Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Bs ck 29 wi~t be a !owed dI. Ny-'ke-iV access
-
to Hampton Way in ~I?~. Location 1._"YO>>i_ ..,i ~__~;1 other. Li"1F? _s t_:
:D .1 3. C''`l ~ r a c ce s ? ; ~ « t L ire, p o _ 17 u: 7 \7 E_ i. . v ; d I. 1 b ti L_ [1 f= t2
roadway.
1 be Vii. ! ;',4'}'L11 CCe ,,s to
ii-r1 ' I i - o z a .o r, o p',) : s , . each other. . ) v ±
location 1 1 I access point is at a point ,t!x012 7 1pr?'_ }X_ [i x_.e]_...
_ o I a m i'' X n ~,£ez' y The v;t'y
_ J :I I- he £1i,7. ? T". t~ from :=1 Yir Oak
thirls distance is requirod from Lone Oak Ron&
Lo Lot 2, B C.._a 1, w._ _ bp _1 kowed in a loi a i on
which Ls _H-' _ t . 21''f £1 1 p' ; T Way. rJ. 1 i _ :.1, m e _ x - _ _ a 0,111-
require -TC,1 1 F. a_ i I - _1 , at the _ s '3x1,2 oti. Ieve I
a
„
proposed ~t7 an Lot and ~o' of 2 ~ ~ -?is }i. 1.
5 Drive
~ g HI to 3 Hampton will allowed
ic-,,c.atic- which is oppositc a common shared access to Lot 2 and Lot
3, both in BLock L.
1 5101 NTS 2JG1HT- OP -W Y/PERMITS: Slope sE',trt,...- will be required,
from ad env properties he L'.1.. proposed grading exceeds
limits of the o ,c~,_~ development. _'C._ proper etc .L i ea i,.,..._!e.
proposed
_
_ .__2 required or se7 xti"C Ain-.. which serve A. than one user,
The ponding eas2menLs are required to limit ' ' t Fri m the shoe to i 20 a rl
c-z ta. _.L: Way ,A1 s3 Ham'_ on n. ive .r.. required to have _ve 70' "l `J','n t"'C':. ways
t _
? y
, _ ,c_ t
Ior~ CORK ROM and 60'
..a , ia,e, Restricted .1 > is require! to the lots aLonq4
the entire boundary . ) t < Lr ,.Jne Oak Row a L., i. xaq'_o!. Avenue.
,t l L e~ T r L _ , r r s c.,. , _ n L, D r 1 its . , _ 11 L r,.9 e , to i r r:a :i r t. h r ~ ' `3 = ~ '
~ L ~ $
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
m Ta"' parcels that are proposed to be platted _?ati7e bee-)
ASS.-..SE311LsTSa
s _'iA=I sewer trunk, storm sower trunk, 1_au r;_3_ bone firam r
wauar main < t a i... Avenue street assessments at 450 of. 4_-`.e.,
actual cost.
T,
storm 1~ )s. " L. i~ site is a e_ t' t ~ 3 per~~_a~.. n~.g sewer trunk
assessment under Project 372.
The following c_ s'v_s..A.:'°"1'U., are r .s-.., as -i _i i_ L'Jn of final pl:.t.;
approval:
PROJ DESCRIPTION e TY
28 Lateral Benefit w i.21
Water _eT. ._,in S20, 737.62 f f $15,15S
Lone PeP Road' 8? _ ' 892.62 f 73,5755
10Lexington Avenue
Upgrade 45a 3: ff 817 If 37,00)
A04 .,ex1_ gi-o;} Avenue 3 I a.01 J f 200 .C1 1•414
104 Lateral Benefit Trunk
Storm Sewer ff 1.a23t If 2,-3
`Z'r A d,ay 12,4ti 781,62 I 22,15)
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $168,008
The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in e f [ne
at thei n e tof f w tan 1 1? !at ap pr' J ',i ca. _ s€(! 4 i ti s ~t on t 1 ail a. -1 3_ a i.
dimensions and areas.
CONDITIONS ,p1`'~i,.£'n ~rD4 y3.2 L.ta 9TH ~tX ADDITION):
1. ALI standard platting conditions shaLj oe adhered toagreement shal 1 to eAt2red into for th',-,
pMae Lots ; - - -
M ,
$2.so S.Y. Ono time sign fee,
.anod /approved hy the AP--
and Council prior T the ..,_:.!a..?ce of i.y bu,. i_i.?g Vrmiwa
a
The > , _1r 1 ..C'. ti; and size A A . ~ i number i ~ i.'. approved : ~ ~-'i~~. the,
. 1 i o r).T.ii r ed into the Vt_i Ming design -o st l ,te
WIM the same material as the buildinn.
The storm sewer 5'u!',.L11 aa oVU I to ti cC'_ l qi. I nun the Lexington,
o',iI Ve storm sower is limited to 20 Len.
S. The stDcA watar ranoff generated by Lot 3, Mock L. is rnquire~]
Vond
i; Driveway _ _ and Himpton L Way are identinhco m the staff report.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PIAT '4 -
x
A g. a e . ^ 7"1
This . _ t shall z i.... _ j 201itknial a _ ° _ s . _,..w_.
ineflectat the Know final
r ~?T
This Svc r en shall - 10' drainava and ntilit'Z,
e n s censored ovor all am..- n lot lines "n'.; i',_
This development shall C.' _ ' V .i or L1
its,
costs (K additional 1' ai A qL , Z l A ai no C i 4., v %
. a
as requirad 1q, ti.spacity of all rcquircd t
' 1 , -1: s C` n {
P 1 on this -'-Lat
servico this development.
z
9 T 1 -
Pandinq e
elovation 11eC ss t_ 1 by City storm water storage Volume
requirements,
C. 1 Lr.r' and Sr,C""IC 1c t
x.t:JI.y>
L. A public streets and u-
s< t°,.t this clove lopmant Via 1 L i designod by
A -s _d professional .'i: rliec.. in accordance with City
c _ _
E- and r~ Ya ~ i'<t:: _ - i 12 T standards and policies, and,
"PC' ovo by sta_a f ? e_ _C:J:~ to final plat - .°Uv_i_a
. L ~<A rT y _x ' d
g ~ r i n a f c J erosion, a....+ sediment
CA v - + ...1.. a J a n3 it prvt_t A h'li staff iZ_' to f1 a1. Plat
approval.
t}
public , shall Ci ; r ciny , ° 7 ,
P-, plan Win! 1 be submittod On the
proposed q adinq p! .Y1 1<1.~ approved to r t4e
-i r._ ,1
_ r-,r _.~Gc.4 1}u f i tic i. ._a. in 1 ouzir,111 „ _ =ll,i1 >J E'
r
4 , i z
C_ i La s t' .i 1_ i 1 t ! _ t, Pr . 1 <'I' :'I i_' C C , t _ C _ , C1 o
until onc year 1 L C:-.L t,. t, C3
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
I All. internal public: an p- i ai- a streets shall use
constructed within h required right-05-way in
accordanco with Ciny design standards.
D, Public Li a -,F `s'e menu
I it any public ° '
r,
a
W.c:u> a ~t ~ prior = i-a'~
L:.~ 1. , a„ ° plat - s r z
E. Permits
1 This t1F-<., , or' ,`~~nt F a l
v.a~..z_b, be e_ --CSW,,i,. Cr for the acquisition ¢ all b C7 't? vto..;-.
. or,' agency po mits in the atime frame
a by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development H11.0211 its paQvs dedication,
requirements enc,-,t s n! by tht~ and
Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
Pt
i... A .i_ S I ' l 4, r t, rig a n e C z n Cp C. . 0 T is s 11 a L 1b
yiddiC? r€ i ;O Lin! o s spec f_ r a LILy granted a
variance
y
Council action.
Advisoryn Planning Commission City Council
Approved:
Revised-
STANDARD
'T OF:
9
AG CENTE JL. AK NO.
I
COUNTY S7ATE AID HWY NO 26 OAK K
p 2.4 .~e~.
` ! ~ F !1!D Yb ~ 4 a. -
N
77
rc
T LO t
LOT 1
LOT
,n r,d Q~ 4 s<
311 sc n. I ,a
G r ~ ~l 1 z er~Fry 4
WAY;`-
e t f se9~4n'zz ~ oa
I
O
i
LOC-AT16N MAP
u
j e ~~r} y
~ „ I Lips
6
~I -
$-49 45,W
M., 6EE. 6f+e r P.io _ P7GF(UN EFiP 61E$T." - F
gex. r r-io
rol- F,i.Euaruxs n
LONE OAK ROAD uEunnoun^ SITE SUMMARY
3 7
ZONING
SSIFICAT1ON: Comm./Industr.
r -4-
~-w s.~ ::eA _ = I TOTAL SITE AREA. t 184,230 SF.
r P-o roa ae 4 e1~ S ~
1 r I HOTEL SITE AREA f 127,060 S .F.
Q~ / 4A' I 1 Ifs ( I~ s
HOTEL FOOTPRINT: 16,318 S.F.
W} fir,' w a BUILDING COVERAGE: 18,918 S.F.
e I( ( ~a' € % LOT COVERAGE 15%
HOTEL ROOMS 123
- TOTAL
o~~~ PARKING SUMMARY
°,Q OOe HOTEL 123 CARS
PROOF OF PARKING 16 CARS
~P
14
TOTAL 139 CARS
PARKING REQUIRED: 139
Wau1• Sib*1 5 5cE 3H• !4 ~ t
P_ro Fo,e stale t p~,t~ v~mee1 i (1/UNIT + 1/ADD. 8 UNITST-
o
w ~~P fey a. ( k y 1
y s RESTAURANT: 81 CARS
O4.g REQUIRED g a
' $ 4 EY
NOTE:
ALL PARKING SPACES ARE
9'X19` UNLESS NOTED \Mq'^+TiaNT SIMJY
OTHERWISE d • ~ siz6<~.cw.r+o.+G' 3
ffi
SITE PLAN
z
7 ~
tue
a Q Q
Z
NORTH dy" .
£ g
Liu
r \ ~
\
II~\\o(y\V~~
.10
91
O `l 1
a did p
w. as « HAMPTON INN Reve,one m
c-1
EAGAN,MK
n'+ ;M Cnxkrtl trY Lm+o~..d i"Y§°%..k P"9 p-&~
LONE OAK ROAD SITE SUMMARY m
ZONING
Q,
CLASSIFICATION: Comm.lhdustr.
TOTAL SITE AREA: t 184,230 S.F.
CPJ
A = o~ I U z HOTEL SITE AREA f 127,060 S.F.
HOTEL FOOTPR
INT: 16,318 S.F.
BUILDING COVERAGE. 18,918 S.F.
% LOT COVERAGE 15%
HOTEL ROOMS 123
t v ` r TOTAL HOTEL AREA 65,272 S.E
» gg~~` t REST. SITE AREA t 57,170 S.F.
PLANT LEGEND RESTAURANT FOOTPRINT 6000 S.F.
% LOT COVERAGE 10.5% SNIADI TREES 2 112' **L SO
' MGa.u.e•. MF .nc Y1V°YiMi \``1~ /a^~ / R~
ot,- PARKING SUMMARY
ILO WERikO TREES- 1 1/2' "IL an c.•..».., s...ws. n..+•a op, op, HOTEL 123 CARS ,dry
PROOF OF PARKING 16 CARS
0 c PER TREES - S Aa an B4 G
TOTAL' 139 CARS.
PARKING
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS - I r %L ..L / 5 1INN REQUIRED: 139
r ce•+ ~ - (1/UNIT + 1/ADD. 8 UNITS _
. rsns*ua..neu. ~ e ~pO Q~, i ~ 1 I - ~ yygg -
ErSR®aEEM SHRUBS as• IRS. seat.
R~`"• y I + m RESTAURANT: 81 CARS
FLOWERS w rww. nac s
LA REQUIRED
T'om' ROCK MULL MADfr-mOr
NOTE:
ALL PARKING SPACES ARE.
9'X19' UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE ~
NOTE,
BOULYnnn LAXDSCAP%#G TO CONFORM
l ems, TO LANDSCAPE MASIERPI.AM CSREiEXMY
OEM DEVELOPED.
T LANDSCAPE
PLAN
NORTH
3~
f I ~
V7
LT
v 7-
1
1
_v
2-5
56'&n
HAMPTON INN
F''_} EAGAN, MINNESOTA *••nw ~«m« o-
pa iMn~ .mob kA
.,..x
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
IL
E
27
=4 ~t4
r _ .
II
-
T, 1
J1 Ana i
f a~ e~
® a Inc
n is
a rN
OY
a
Olw~ Nu. prgecr Jo0 Na PrW Mgr. Peviaion®
HAMPTON INN
~}G EAGAN, MINNESOTA a*w awcx.a oy 1-21 CORPORATION
P5 Txw aw vnnwa DEARS- BLA-OERS OEVEUDPERS
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4r
R p pox 150, Minneeppllp, MN 55440(612)038-4444
MEMO TO C. HALL, yyD 7i ADVISORY PIANNING COMMISSION
ROM n PLJ NN ..N~C Dl. PAIITME T
DATE: OC°ro3 22, 1987
SU aa. a.CT; CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL CM C =ATU AI:) 1: .1C
(PREVIOUS US CEDAR C D_I IP S Y c..° ~ 9 E 00 PARK 3RD ADDITION)
August 25, L967, this item was denied tl)c AP C d n l
for a '1 e0 r F City : i meeting. Prior to Wat meeting, the
aDplication requirements ana process.
'
ee City Attorney's
office reviewed the applications and determine`.._
a t 2_. s G:~
_ - tl g -in i3Ii L. f t. '-.0
insure prop2r legal notification prior to going to the Council, this
item was rescheduted for a pubirin nearing at the OcLober 29, 1987
APC meeting.
Staff recommends that the application iiiiiS,.'. be changed from the Cedar
Cliff i_ L,tL 1mC- uci<s S, Pack r.__ Addition to the 4th Addition in d order keep our filing system ui order.
staff }c , c ? i h._ o f1.j? A report for ! 3 e Auto Center, an
@10. . v showing h c l ,_i..nsb 1 r: o '_h day care facility and Auto
`M _ a U petition from residents of the ar.- a ,"t, x 1. ; i their eii a.:J ti rot
t s _.1 i i lA 1 to t. .I: fro ! a e i v i o x ..7. ! 1 J- t.. ,-I n
owners of kho Auto Cenvor Lot.
SUBJECT: PD D LC 2 'ENT, L.
CO DITIC JSE PL' IT ?
CEDAR CL._Lx a' C01,1MEINCItils PAi , i_ r t ux Ii: it
APPLICANT: AUSTIN COIMPNNIES
LOCATIO : OUTLOT A, CEDAR CLIFF CC, 7
SE 1/4 SECTION 30
EXISTING ZONING: WITHIN CEDAR CLIFF C ,.-u: I.~"_ PARK
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 13, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting, a
Planned Development Amendment to allow an automotive sir 'ire r'rt
on LB (Limited Business) designated land within the Cc,or Cliff
Commerical Park P.D. and a Preliminary Plat for the Cedar Cliff
Commercial Park 3rd Addition. This 1.83 acre one lot plat is
located on the north side of Cliff Road between Cliff Drive and
Scott Trail and is currently a portion of Outlot A of the 1st
Addition.
Immediately to the north is the Building Block Addition (d
center). Before any final approvals can occur in that area,
storm water issue must be resolved. In an effort to do so, a
Building Block Addition will be replatted into the Cedar Cliff
Commercial Park 4th Addition as Lot 1 and the remaining area to the
northwest will become Outlot A with a drainage and utility easement
for the ponding area. It is anticipated that the Cedar Cliff
Commercial Park 4th Addition will be scheduled for the September APC
meeting.
SITE PLA (CODE CO FORMA CE: This 15,170 SF automotive service
center will have four main tennants: Tires Plus, Lavells Auto P--lar ;.o
(retail sales only), Muffler Pro and an undetermined user. A sfroile
access from Cliff Drive matching that of the shopping center to the
west will serve this site. All building and parking setbacks meet
code requirements. Sixty-seven exterior parking stalls have been
provided and eighteen are proposed as service bays within the
building (85 total). If a strict 'retail only' sales parking ratio
were used, 101 stalls would be required. At the 30,000 SF Car Care
Center along Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive, 143 stalls were
approved in that site plan. That also included 19 that would be
shared with a proposed restaurant site. Austin Companies is also
proposing a similar 17,000 + SF project in Eden Prairie with 88
stalls. It appears that parking should be sufficient for this
proposal since most uses are short term and the total 'retail only'
space is 5,870 SF. All stalls are 10' wide except for the 26
designated employee only ones on the rear side of the building. The
lot coverage is 19% in a 20% (LB) district.
The building itself will be constructed of face brick, precastd
concrete and prefinished aluminum. The proposed main color will
closely resemble the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center adding to the
continuity of the Planned' Development. The applicant is aware that
no roof top mechanical equipment shall be visible. The trash will
be contained completely in the building and no exterior storage has
been proposed. The landscape plan works well conceptually - all
sizes and species are acceptable.
The proposed pylon sign is located on the southeast corner of the
site - over 300' from the shopping center sign. The detailed design
has not been completed but all code requirements would be adhered
to.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROS IOCONTROL: The proposed auto mall site
occupies Lot 1 of the proposed Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd
Addition. Lot 1 is bounded by Cliff Road on the south, Cliff Drive
on the west, and Scott Trail on the east. The proposed grading plan
generally conforms to the existing grades of Cliff Drive and Scott
Trail.
Drainage along the northerly edge of Lot 1 is proposed to be
provided by a deep swale into which all drainage from Lot 1 and Lot
2 is directed. This drainage swale is shown initially to drain
northwest into a regraded portion of the existing pond.
When the outlet to Pond AP-50 (lying easterly of Scott Trail) is
provided in the future, the drainage from Lot 1 and Lot 2 is
required to be directed east into Pond AP-50. Considering the
elevations proposed for the Building Block Child Daycare Center on
Lot 2 and the auto mall on Lot 1, this alternate is the most
feasible permanent drainage plan for these two lots. The study of
the outlet to Pond AP-50 has considered this eventuality. The
developer shall escrow the necessary funds to provide the required
storm sewer and to fill and relandscape the swale in the future when
the Pond AP-50 outlet is constructed. The storm sewer system which
conveys the water from the drainage swale between Lots 1 and 2 into
the proposed pond on Outlot A will need to be abandoned at that
time.
No grading plan for the ultimate use of Lot 3 is provided. Much of
the existing lower area on Lot 3 and on Outlot A is shown to be
regraded to provide a small but deep detention pond. The bottom
elevation of the pond is proposed at elevation 888.0 and the
overflow outlet elevation is proposed at 900.0. (The pond outlet is
connected to the storm sewer system which ultimately discharges into
Pond AP-9.) A pond with a depth of approximately twelve feet below
the outlet is of questionable value for storm water drainage
purposes. It is recommended that the bottom elevation be raised to
approximately two to three feet below the controlled outlet
elevation. This proposed elevation is low enough to receive storm
water temporarily from Lots 1 and 2 and can ultimately serve as a
permanent ponding area for the balance of this site. The dependable
storage volume of this pond is not increased by the proposed greater
depth.
A permanent ponding easement should be provided for the pond and the
maintenance of the pond should remain with the property draining
into it.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this
application.
UTILITIES: The existing sanitary sewer and water lines in Cliff
Drive are of adequate capacity and depth to serve this development.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to
access to the site from westerly adjacent Cliff Drive in
location. Dakota County will be requiring dedication of r r°
access along the entire border with Cliff Road.
Traffic circulation throughout the site can be easily accomplished
for cars and single-axle trucks without encroachment into the
parking stalls. A semitrailer-type unit would not be able to make
turning maneuvers without encroachment into the parking stall areas.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS: The proper easements w i l l
e
-required for the proposed pond, its outlet, and for the fca z r_e st1- )tw
sewer to be constructed in the swale between proposed Lots 1 and
Adequate street rights-of-way have been provided for Cliff Drive
Scott Trail. Adequate right-of-way is shown to be provided with tie
platting to accommodate Cliff Road.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired from the appropriawe
agency in the proper time frame.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for platting as Cec ti Cliff
Commercial Park 3rd Addition has been assessed for the following
public utilities at the commercial/industrial rate: sanitary sewer
trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk, sanitary sewer lateral
benefit, water lateral benefit, water area upgrade, and water
lateral benefit.
The proposed parcel will be required to pay its proposed a sesm t
for trailway along Cliff Road as a condition of final plat approvfe. L.
The trailway assessment is identified at the rate of $12.49 per
front foot for the frontage along Cliff Road which is 285.38 front
feet. The rate and the total front footage equate to a total
proposed assessment of $3,564.00.
All final assessment obligations will be calculated on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with
the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PK 3RD ADDITION
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. No exterior storage, sales or displays shall be permitted.
3. No roof top mechanical equipment shall be permitted.
4. The pylon sign shall be no taller than the Cedar Cliff Shopping
Center sign and contain no more than 125 SF of signage per
side. All building mounted signage shall be compatible
and uniform in size. All signage shall be subject to the
one-time sign fee of $2.50 SF.
--5. The detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading
plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until
1 year after the date of installation.
6. 26 employee parking stalls with a 9' width shall be permitted.
7. The development shall be responsible for the cost of
construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff
from Lots 1 and 2 into the existing storm sewer system in Scott
Trail when the outlet for Pond AP-50 is constructed.
8. The proposed pond bottom elevation shall not be more than three
feet below the controlled water elevation of the pending area.
9. The development shall modify its proposed site plan to provide
adequate room for turning maneuvers of tractor/trailer-type
unit.
10. This development shall also comply with the most recent
requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted
by Council action.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
11. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private prbperty or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of--'
and temporary slope easements for ultimate developmer_. a
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriat
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements~to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designs-<1 by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to f.i l plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
(OVER)
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved:
Revised:
STANDARD
LTS`2
i•
• .o .w mf w °Vt m e® ~~Mlb'O 91, .1 I./ i e t is el, 6 9
wd ~d.•e
N
N Sy ih•" i '•"i ~~.n > ,3.9.63 _
y ~ ~1 1
'cam W
/!3. ao ' o e y
® rhJ ~"C} •
° , t ® Q 4 qb b
Z+ff c® cE yeQ d ,
ti.
v tR e
3'r 3. 4B r ,f
S
CLIFT--- COMMERCIAL
°o =
IZZ
7: t
v HI-i
Oi gy~A
a ~'s :ar s.y~a.•,9ax 0. r^~zJ aigti:.r <u,nc.. B -~.am':.+:-r-.-..>,.-.. ^.+---•-~....a f
a~ ~nu,n f
0 3 r-1 i
»wPOYIj j k^+ab ~ smi•u/~I ~Q es ww nw~7 Wj,
Y-~
Q
rHopO fl DAYCARK CSN &
r e..Y.:.s•yK...
Key t+ • y
are..: U...
n.alarr n...
-.6-- 1JTTR41RT[11THH
ewr. B.=.. 4~ ~tlliy 8a4iaa
TtaaY R.4i .
n«a.~ e. a { ~t In
* Mrn G'+P~ Ia-ae
1 t ~ ~y r Autn all BuildiIE I 8e,1- Cu Cars Bs,'
GF1M~D ii Yf/ ( - Q that! a1. OntSA YM9 a.t } dab P.r4 YNa1Y ye c."F
Nr+i`) a"~1 BIla: roou t1i6 al. ~ ~ w-~t ~'~~«w
v-. 7
Tt- Pto e.ua 6st1.4 La E?'_.. W*
bee0 al a~ l.• . P. ~ ~.r9+••!`
Site & Utility Plan Data }
qq n. _ rvrxc t
8atidtac A[.a ~ _ 7 --r ks 'r'.r-t F cc ~+fnnw s..F+Yf '
Aate B.r:las= 9600 Nn.
5610 Ntt.
T.4.1 Aran. 16110 sJt N *3
Jul. A»ta q}
Arr.a Y.6! urw ii .
ff r
A 1.
Pers..t or B.11di.9 c..... ta
P.r}Fat Nega7»d 71 HN.ud
P. rt lot Proridad 6 Yra.id.d
b. odlaag 8t.li. P[a.id.d ! } ~ t -
Pn 7U..
- er rrS.+n.tnMe
H-k
~«g Cliff Road ( it C~J! 1 " DIAL PARK
SITE & UTILITY PLAN
DE4rT O "rN 13 , AUSTIN SMITH & LEO T. "U12CHT .._...._..W.~.._
87 :14 SNID+ .itl, Ia tN-'-E,: .ayt _ 4-.a vl
0 t0 Y0 40
16i1)635-v trot
PAW M LOT
9I9YAT70N AT DAY CARL
.
,~~¢v rwo,.Wwiw.+o h8 ns.•,t -
i~ • • , RNTX$ TO aX aLY AT N11L'
01,v J, I
'{~to Mall Building f
i/!t ~i+t~ • ~"4WR 6NATION W & A f
.i t 1 ! ~ ~ \V -I~ A
r t; ` y i t
! - ~~I t
LFE- It-L-L-
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK
NoRru THIRD ADDITION
GRADING /DRAINAGE PLAN EAGAN AUTO MALL
LA0AN. YTNNLt*)TA
c~ h1?ikD-Ot
f+r r+r n w woe (
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT
(CUTTER'S RIDGE 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: NE 1/4, SECTION 21
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 27, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 21, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 3 A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single
Family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Cutter's Ridge 2nd
Addition. This plat consists of 11 lots on 4.35 acres that also
includes the 1.35 acre Outlot A of the 1st Addition located west of
Pilot Knob Road and north of Deerwood Drive. This plat is in
conformance with the January 1987 Land Use Plan that designates this
area as D-II (0-6) units/acre.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: The original concept plan for the
Cutter's Ridge Additions was revised prior to the Advisory Planning
Commission meeting in July so the street connection to the Horne
property on the north could be made. The preliminary plat of the
lst Addition was modified slightly eliminating the stove pipe lot
along Pilot Knob Road - a reduction of 1 lot. The 2nd Addition
picks up that lot, therefore the number of lots originally planned
for the 20 acres remains at 47.
This site consists of mostly open grassland with a hardwood tree
stand along the southeastern portion of the plat. There is an
existing home site on Lot 2, Block 4, that meets all Code setback
requirements. The lots vary in size from 12,000 SF - 22,300 SF and
the gross density of the plat is 2.5 units/acre. Since the existing
home is on a lot under 1 acre in an R-1 district, it will have to
either connect to City sewer and water or be granted a Variance to
maintain its well and septic system. The address for that home will
also be changed from its current one along Pilot Knob Road to one on
proposed Street W.
GRADING/ DRAINAGE/ EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan
provides for street grades in accordance with City of Eagan
standards and generally conform to the existing contour of the land.
The proposed grading plan complies with the City's maximum allowable
3:1 slope criteria. The grading at the westerly end of street 'A'
is shown on property outside of the proposed plat boundary which
requires a slope easement from the westerly adjacent property. In
addition, the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac is required at
the westerly end of street W. Either an easement from the
westerly adjacent property is required to construct a temporary cul-
de-sac or Lot 1, Block 5, should be platted as an outlot to
accommodate this temporary cul-de-sac construction.
Drainage on this site is proposed to be conveyed by the storm sewer
provided in Street 'C' of Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. Conditions
relating to drainage in the staff report of Cutter's Ridge 1st
Addition Preliminary Plat must be complied with to ensure proper
conveyance of storm water runoff generated by the proposed 2nd
Addition.
An erosion and sediment control plan, including both a site map and
narrative, must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance
of a grading permit or final plat approval.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is
propsed to be extended from Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. The
sanitary sewer in Street 'A' shall be extended to the west line of
Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition to provide continuation of service to the
westerly adjacent property. The sanitary sewer in Street 'C' south
of Street 'A' is not required to be extended to the south lineof
the plat. It is anticipated the property southerly of Cutter's
Ridge 2nd Addition will drain southerly to the existing sanitary
sewer in Deerwood Drive.
Water main to serve Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is proposed to be
extended from Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. The 12" trunk water main
in Street 'B' and 'C' of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is properly
shown. However, the 12" trunk main in Street 'B' within Cutter's
Ridge lst Addition shall be extended to the westerly plat line as
opposed to Pilot Knob Road. This 12" trunk main will ultimately be
extended northerly across I-35E as part of the utility extensions to
serve Cutter's Ridge lst Addition.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street circulation and access to
Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is provided by the proposed streets of
Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. However, as previously mentioned, a
temporary cul-de-sac at the westerly end of Street 'A' is required.
A temporary cul-de-sac is not required at the southerly end of
Street 'C' because no driveways are proposed to access onto Street
'C' south of Street 'A'.
EMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PE ITS: This development is responsible for
its proportionate share of the costs associated with easement
acquisitions for sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer
extensions beyond its plat boundaries. Also, the development will
be responsible for acquiring the easement necessary to construct the
temporary cul-de-sac at the westerly end of Street 'A'.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: A portion of the parcels proposed to be developed as
Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition were previously assessed for sanitary
sewer trunk, water area and storm sewer trunk.
The proposed development shall assume its proportionate share of the
pending assessments against the underlying parent parcel for the
upgrading of Pilot Knob Road under Project #466.
The development shall be responsible for the following proposed
assessments as a condition of final plat approval:
PROJ t DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
88 Water Area $1,250/ac 1.02 $1,275
297 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 28,908 1,532
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $2,807
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quanti c iL s and dimensions in the final plat and in accordance with
the ra:_-s in effect at the time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: CUTTER'S RIDGE 2ND ADDITION
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. The existing home on Lot 2, Block 4, shall change its address
to be consistent with the others along Street W.
3. The existing home shall either connect to City sewer & water or
else be granted a Variance from the R-1 1-acre without sewer
and water minimum lot size requirement.
4. The approved conditions for Cutter's Ridge must be complied
with as a condition of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition final plat
approval.
1 1 ~ ~I , t ~1 j ~,35 f'1 ~ t p 'T'l~ ~ II-'r ~ ~ l
{ ti'
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
%
l > t / ' + Total Acres 17.02 AC
RA.W. 4.172 AC
Al"
Lots 37
I l
Acres Single Family 11.81 AC
y r t Average Lot Size 13,670 SO FT
r
i i 1 i t 1t+ Outlet A 1,35 AC
t `tI - j Yry C ' ^x a S
ODUat B .04 AC
A r u' 5 _
Ffl R- U~.~
DENSITY
PF Gross 2.2 U/AC
Net
a l
Less ROW 28 UlAC ar
Cana-- sa ac
- -r ~ J~ 5 4~ 5 8 t g. "fl~ r10-` ~ ft ;~tz
A ~bq Existing Zoning -R1
i f}D- S } f f s "a'' L, t cwt o + acP Ala Rm no ~.p o E.,~w4 t R-1 TYPICAL LOT & SETBACKS
5 s{ i a
Site F } lr pBIO rr 14 Rezoned to R-1
STREET 8'
13
o- / / l ff \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION
C { 1 ~f 3 4 5 8 7 9 ~z2
Ak-- W 2 F n eA i - - r! r 4 ~i +Y r t ~l HORLH Sia Oi TttF -U-FIT ti
Cr 7 ~r~ +~s16 f i. -4 ~4 f Swf z>'A I t E OE ttfE HOn THEnsi e~A EACCPT rteE
1,2
y+~ ( „ t 4 )ft N
r--t`Y5f 33fi£ET O E PO THE EOST'i~l $r ~O S1 T1.1 F-T
NORTHEA4 O SECTION 11,
t 1F f v f S THE 3>r RANGE p3
12 F{ 11 rr.10 J 81.QGG A
3 `ri t# rr. };">s a u s 4 i e 1 t ti.vlt µ10~~~,4
E3
€TM
SeM .
- 4
6 'n ri mom fEETl STREET CC
a
> } t Jai TBOC i "p"4`'~,."..~-.'/ CUT EERA'S RIDGE
BC 5 t 7 _3 ~3 8 8r / / r as
a PRELIMINARY PLAT
ter:.......... :i tl GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CO.
100ErGPARKWAY 42To
- }-~CRSO E~r~* t(( l
GE 7 ~T { _ 1 _ } ( ` / `nm a t Hidden Valley
,Yr \ \ RID MlA
Ut 1
4 \ 2l I + " 6 Delve
FF,T
L , ' V /j /~A } \ ( / \ ` -
EGOnitgttr~t 47fltjfr tlf faf { I . •A 1-__ ry _ i y ~t^ ~ ~t L 71 / ii ~ ¢I PLArItiER: £N _
-NE, ROBERT IE
/ L~ , l ;t 9 2p25 EAST NENreEPM AYE PISS wAYZATA BlY6,
. • ' • } t µt J! Y' MMNEFPOLf3, Mk l3A 13 MINNEA 1, MM 53 b
0t Nut dt A. 1.Ja At
C I \ { ~"T l F _ ~ Y _ ! / Y rf f{ 4 ~ { UP It i
{ HE;=3 "
floniny iric[Symbof
DATE: o-ra-ro..
zj
ii
r r-r-ave
RE
V
District Boundary
i.i
~-Cutter w ill be
> Ci nul Pot.- r4onyy
~/f
t PD
DA 9
0 25 50 inn 200 FEET 71
SCALE r~50 ktst
F7- ff,
7.7
77
71
~ ~ l t.~r f _ btu ,~...~.7.' • , i -°~i~~,~ ~ T9o-~3.~',
r~/ ,/'1~ • (~"j, / f + - '..trtL._..~. r9201
j. r
{jj fry - ? c'~j'7~~c r . r it -~+~,,.,Yf
D ~S ^ A 1' `L.~ I \
r I , J } ( J. rJ.""1 ;J:L
r' = t^' ~.f= - -"'f ~J1 ~ {n x.153 f ? r ~ -,r~! i 1
y L 1 J3l Ir r ."a•'''•••'if.'~ .1 r. 1.4 / L i
°Y - TSB r'' -t ' ' •`€?.~.;~;,:1.,.,.~:;.: g 'r _
t rzx fix. Y FJ t r•0y
T90 . fit , .'fit.'.'.-.'.-.. ; ' • _ r , , '""'a
~~•..~"`,~\`e; ;'x.12 h ~i, f~ .r.: / .r•ri,. , ° aF` --}y
T, ~ /r( r. J.....~.• . ~ d ..il ri:<~r:':~:•'.~:-. pt:, ~ttY, ~3a®-
\ ~~~•i~ZJ.,•J1 ~I ~1~ i' '.•r. Y'. .•.i..........,a... _ ~I{ r `:I~v i.
4;>'t - is h v \ t
rr Al~ar
. ~z
-c.s
at
~9mOp ® oo<ao r
~.c x pGa~wm z , o
0 CL
S'j
rv k
C-4 1-04 n N
c =c°" ca >
WATER AREA n
i~ <<fi m ATE LATERAL BENEFIT
STORM SEWER TRUNK
j Y IH ~