Loading...
11/03/1987 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission 1 A l€ n - , 1"F has r e vv on uliax. L A. a o - V4 a. 1 n 4 a 17 is ca _ NT O o tl City Idition p a tY' i trail I lat b9 to t tri ) trai' 3. C c e ° '.l 3rd pC5 1 f r al •y Cou G Len 1. Parks Dedication of Cutlet B., and th 2. 3. 11 1 f > y 4. T} r l 2 Cliff I T f ty (40) 6u ey 1r C 3 4- 1- ed _'or Oc r0 avo C C s H lear DI ! CIT 1 Advi C Sy Mi v a Awed for th 'al ly r HE t3 t( i C 5 4- he i ^ P9 1 e 1 _ b of due t T that the Mr. i1 d pr 5 of Aug t 1st 11:!5 P Date ti 7 A. Pr plat of ° the Cedar ua t to c = ition P--li.oy for 2. Ni- 2nd A A. y 11 .35 a to a >r ADVISORY PARKS "C_: Tlv CC :4: K F__ V--' i'Im JF PARKS T_ 3, 7 R : FIRE STATION #5 Cit t t c is to be Si , r a action at KVI js CC: Tc , Cia Ke L, Fir r'fj 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BE A bLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODOPF WACHTER n -R September 30, 1987 T, 71vi GEORGE SCHENCK 1925 BERKSHIRE DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Proposed Construction of Fire Station #5 Dear Mr. Schenck: The City has acquired the Lydia Schindeldecker property and is planning to proceed with the construction of Fire Station #5 on the site. Plans for site development and Fire Station #5 will be reviewed during this winter with construction occurring in the spring/summer of 1988. At the August 6, 1987 neighborhood meeting, Mayor Fire Chief Southorn and I stated the reasons why the Schi, 1 ecker property was selected for the future site of Fire Stati 5. At that meeting, a request was made to consider another sick t $-'-1e intersection of Galaxie and Cliff. These sites were revs--r:_,: 'ay our Fire Department and the City Council, however, it was determined by both that the Schindeldecker property was best suited to meet the criteria desirable for a neighborhood fire station. There is also a desire expressed by several neighbors on Berkshire Drive that if the fire station is located on the Schindeldecker property that the west portion of that property remain in a park like setting. It is a City policy that neighborhood parks have a minimum of ten (10) acres to be designated as an active neighborhood parkland. However, as stated at the August 6 meeting, the City will further review and consider a possible exception for this property, realizing there is no active playground area west of Galaxie Road. Any parkland development would contain limited playground equipment and for all practical purposes be maintained as a passive parkland araa. This item will be reviewed by our Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council in the near future. THE LONE OAK TREE -THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GRO H IN OUR Fire Station #5 September 30, 1987 Page Two It is the intention of this office and Fire Chief Southorn that we keep the local neighborhood informed of any and all plans for the development of the fire station as we proceed with this project during the next several months. The City is site sensitive and will do everything possible to preserve the existing integrity of the neighborhood. Sin rely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief Bea Blomquist, Mayor Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation TLH/jeh ' CTOR Of t ® Cu: 2. 1 3. l~ tit 2m 3e hies s in q, 1 platted prior t) 2.02 1 , would f A ._l 2 ---aj T0: ADVISORY ~ *S & RECREATION COMMISSION FRO : KE ',A, DIRECTOR OF PARKS DATE: Po 3, 1987 az J'ICE MANAGEMENT PF.;' to Al t( KV/js SCHEDULE PARKS CMAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 87 E3 89 ,ECT TASK NOV. DEC. 7 a FEB. MAR. APR. Y. JUN. J UL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. B. R. APR. Council/Commission Review 1111111141111H111,11111 aission Statement 11/1 rogram Issues I!!1 1!!1 /lll if/1 Goals Identification 1111 /111 1//I arksite/use Inventory 111111111 1!!1 !/I/ ll/l 1/!! IIf! lassification Mode Devl• rode Application 1/111' !/1 Task/Quality Indicators ~ I!/!I !fl !!!1 lf! aintenance/Oper. Schedule !11 !!1! erformance Standards 1/!! /11/'/1!1 Procedure Manuals- As Built Plans !!!!l!!! 1!!1/1/ I/1! I1!!! II1 111/! I!! 5/10 Yr. Replacement Pr gm. omputerization !1/ /Ill 1/11 11/1 I/I/ /I/11 1/1 1111 !1! 11/.11// 1111/111/f/1! Maintenance Impact Model f!!! !1/1 ost Mgmt. Implementation !f!!f PARKSITE/USE INVENTORY A. Classification Scheme - Example - e Park Primary Class Secondary Class Total UsablereaDe vl. Goat Hill Comm. Ath. Fields Special Use 22.8 18.4 Cedar Pond Comm. Park Mini Park 7.7 3.9 3.9 0.0 Highview Neighborhood - B. Facilities Inventory - Example - Facilities Park Tennis Baseball Hceke Pleas.Rink Shelter F'i i.t B11 1,,,; Goat Hill 2 2 1 Multi-Use 1 i~Q Cedar Pond 1 Highview 1 1 1 600, C. User Inventory - Example - Park Primary Activities Use Levels Prof air.g F n cio Goat Hill Baseball M Eagan blue T Play Unit L/M Hockey H General Use Hockey - Youth L Practice Pleasure Skate M-H General Use L Speed Skate TURF MANAGEMENT A system designed for prescribing specific levels of cultural t:re sen: turf to achieve desired goals based upon the intensity of uE lie visibility, and aesthetic considerations. Mode I Premium quality turf managed under a program of intense cultural i,r ea terries is , Turf areas subjected to frequent and intense levels of use throughout a majority of the growing season. Commonly associated with athletic field sites programmed for organized sports. Turf height maintained with a reel mower to minimize damage to leaf blades and establish a uniform grain (1 1/2 - height). Irrigated sites normally mowed once every three. to five days; son- irrigated sites, once per week. Minimum of three fertilizer f1 ica -i.onr:. Per year. Soil aerified minimum of three time: per year to reduce cor par't~cr . Topdressing performed as frequently as once per year to maintain meeuth turf grade. Overseeding or sodding performed annually to re-establish uniform turf cover on worn areas. Pre-emergent and broadleaf herbicide applications conducted annually to maintain weeds at less than one percent cover. Turf may require periodic dethatching. Mode II High quality turf managed under a program of moderate to in tense Mural treatments. Turf areas generally subjected to moderate levels o" and often associated with high public visibility sites such as mu: cipal buildings, community centers, arboretums, cultural facilities, and other special use sites. Turf height normally maintained with a reel mower on a five to seven day frequency. Trimming and edging performed with each mowing. Entire sites or portions thereof may be irrigated. Minimum of two fertilizer applications per year. Aerfication normally performs-d only in areas subjected to intensive foot traffic. Topdressing and overs, c `d-LIILQ' con a Led as required by soil compaction and turf wear. P? -dcmr r of and b oadlead herbicide applications made once per year to maintain weed populu.Lion at a minimal level. Mode III Moderate to high-quality turf managed under a program of balanced cultural treatments. Turf areas subjected to use levels ranging, from moderate visitation to areas of intense usage. Commonly associated with the broadest range of park and recreation areas including tot lots, rei;hhorhood perks , and, community parks. Mowing normally conducted with a rotary type mower at a frequency of seven to ten days. Mowing height 2 - 2 1/2 inches with some grass clippings visible. One or two fertilizer applications wade per year, usually during fall months. Core aerification of soil generally not required, but may be made in conjunction with overseeding or sodding in degradat<ed turf areas. Topdressing seldomly performed. Herbicide application mad In f;111 to control broadleaf weeds at a moderately acceptable level. TURF MANAGEMENT PAGE 2, Mode IV Low to moderate quality turf managed under a program of min r~j.l cultur°?. treatments. Turf areas generally not subject to direct public, ccc and m, commonly occurring along boulevards, internal trailways or in maarginal of larger parks. Mowing conducted an average of once per two weeks. Height of turf at mowing may exceed four inches. Grass clippings are commonly visible and may blow onto adjoining surfaces, e.g. trails. Cultural treatments such as aerification, topdressing, and weed spraying, not normally practiced. Overseeding/sodding practices are utilized only to the point of controlling erosion or minimizing public hazards. Concentration of weeds may be moderate to high. Mode V Low quality grassy areas not maintained for outdoor recreation use. Generally mowed to a rough quality level only once or twice per year for the purpose of controlling noxious weeds, maintaining pedestrian visibility, or reducing grass fire potential. Mode V areas may include certain easements, open space areas, or marginal components of community-type parks. Includes prairies subjected to controlled management berms, Mode VI All other areas, as determined by policy, where ground cover shall be left in a non-maintained (natural) condition. Examples include wooded areas, open spaces, green belts, wetlands, interpretive areas, and community preserves. TURF MAINT;, ' 'try. TASK Mode Mowing Frequency Irrigation Fertilization Weed Control Aerification Topdressing OverSeeding I 3 - 5 days (irrigated) Common 3/year Pre-emerge/ 3/year 1/year As required broadleaf II 5 - 7 days Selected Areas 2 /year Pre-emerge/ As required - As required broadleaf III 7 - 10 days _ 1 _ 2 /year Broadleaf As required IV 10 - 14 days V 2 - 3/year VI - indicates a function not normally associated with the level of maintenance indicated. TURF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Classification/Park Mode Community Athletic Fields I II III IV V VI Goat Hill Northview Rahn Ohmann Lex/Diffley Community Parks Cedar Pond Blackhawk Patrick Eagan Thomas Lake Trapp Farm Neighborhood Parks Burr Oaks Lexington Country Home Evergreen Bridle Ridge Highview Pilot Knob Moonshine Quarry Blue Cross/Blue Shield Woodhaven Carnelian Meadowlands River Hills Winkler Jackson Vienna Woods Ridgecliffe Walden Heights Well Site Oak Chase Walnut Hill Lakeside South Oaks O'Leary Wescott Station Special Use Sites Fish Lake Carlson Lake Heine Pond Mini Parks Cinnamon Ridge Peridot Path Linear Parks Boulevard Trails Highline Trail Berry Patch Windcrest Conservancy Ravine East Thomas Ridge cliff Lineal Government Buildings Municipal Center Library Public Works Building Utility Plant Fire Station 1 Fire Station 2 Fire Station 3 Fire Station 4 Fire Station 5 Cliff Reservoir Booster Station 1987 TURF MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FERTILIZATION ANALYSIS ATHLETIC SITES MMAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SLPT« OCT. NORTHVIEW - softball fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10 - soccer fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10 - General 24-4-12 8-4-24 GOAT HILL - basdaa].l fields 24-4-12 28-3-8 8--1+__2z25-5-10 - General 24-4-12 8-4-24 RAHN - Softball (new) 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10 - Softball (old) 24-4-12 28-3-8 8-4-24 25-5-10 - General 24-4-12 8-4-24 SPECIAL USE Cedar Pond 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10 Fish Lake 24-4-12 20-10-1.0 rapp Farm 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10 Walnut Hill 24-4-12 8-4-21 25-5-10 Municipal Center 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10 Library 24-4-12 20-10-10 Fire Admin. 24-4-12 20-10-10 NEIGHBORHOOD Blackhawk 20-10-10 , Blue Cross/ Blue S-- 24-4-12 Bur Oaks 24-4-12 20-10-10 Carlson Lake 24-4-12 20-10-10 Carnelian Cinnamon Rid e 24-4-12 8-4-24 25-5-10 County Home 24-4-12 20-10-10 Ever reen 24-4-12 20-10-1n Hi hview 24-4-12 20-10-10 Lakeside ®xin ton 24-4-12 20-10-10 Meadowlands 8-4-24 25-5-10 Oak Chase 24-4-12 2f_-1 O' Lear 24-4-12 Peridot Path 24-4-12 20-10-10 MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPT. OCTOBER Pilot Knob 20-10-10 Quarry 8--fF -24 -9-5-10 Ridgecliff River hills ~~ry 20 [ So. So. Oaks 8-4-24 25-5-10 Woodhaven - Beryl -1 20-10-10 - Gold Trail 4-12 8-4-24 OTHER Firestation #1 24-4-12 20-10-10 Firestation #2 24-4-12 20-10-10 Firestation #3 24-4-12 20-10-10 Public Works Bldg. 20-10-10 Utility Plant 24-4-12 20-10-10 u CJBS soccer 24-4-12 20-10-10 Well Site 24--+-12 20-10-10 1988 - ns.)2 MAINT- ` el EA{ ECREATI:'; ' PARK F, f ? "t YEAR L g_ i .'tDS. Tp. 1988 Cost 1984 Cost 1990 Cost 1991 Cost 1992 Cost Blackhawk Trail 75 5C8 540 Overlay 3800 Burr Oaks Trail 74 945 8 840 Overlay 2800 Blue Cross/ Trail 86 960 8 853 Sealcoat 350 Blue Shield Parking Lot 86 - - 1,250 Sealcoat 500 Tennis Courts(2) 87 120 120 1,600 Color- 4800 coat Hard Court 87 100 60 666 Color- 2000 coat Carlson Lake Access 78 235 10 261 Sealcoat 150 Overlay 1800 Hardcourt 78 - - 83 Sealcoat 50 Overlay 600 Carnelian Parking Lot 72 - - 1,159 Patching 87 Over- 8100 lay Trails 87 655 8 582 Sealcoat 250 Hardcourt 87 80 57 445 Color- 1350 coat Cedar Pond Trail 74 1874 6 1,250 Overlay 87 Sealcoat 500 Cinnamon Ridge Trail 81 865 4 384 Seal- 200 coat Hardcourt 87 40 40 178 Color- 550 coat Country Home Tennis Court(l) 72 120 60 800 Colorcoat 84 Overlay/ 8000 Colorcoat Evergreen Tennis Court(2) 75 120 108 1,440 Overlay/ 84 Color- 3800 Color- 4300 Coat coat coat Hardcourt 75 80 51 453 Overlay/ 87 Color- 1350 Coat coat Trail 79 826 734 Overlay 5200 Fish Lake Parking Lot 85 - - 1,748 Seal- 700 coat Goat Hill Parking Lot 85 - - 4,781 Seal- 1900 coat Trail-Shelter 87 88 10 98 Seal- 50 coat Trail 85 1467 8 1,304 Seal- 500 coat Highline Trail Blackhawk-Pilot 79 7994 10 8,882 Sealcoat 87 Over- 62200 lay Sandstone- 80 5452 10 6,057 Sealcoat 87 Overlay 42400 Blackhawk ~t1 1 TTTT TlTATT UI TT TI)N t 'ie t b ithin Trs. s hog r serer d 2. T V T' could 3e -_l be 4. t 5. Tare -f the biz n l r 1 ould be d, A. B. ectur i, of joists, wood Ce D. 2. x9'8.... a8 b. to buildit area C. t 3. The 4m T 1. in the buildi 11 i a. b. d. e. bCrr f. g. s h. aside or } 2. m oten ( .ted , waste and 1 a. b. C. w _ cxa d. e. 1 , 3. A 1,1 loe l -A I the b 5. b. Id I hi--in 11 an el c hai Ll C? The Leon A. B. T' 1 bs C. D. E. F. G. s ain J. K. N. 0. b R 9. A. B. 04 0® Lble. 10, a..N 1 m 0~ c L. B. l i f_. ID RC .w FROND: ' R O~ PC" 'IOC DATE-. 3, 37 R : PARKS RLC. :"CIO : b . d ,8 `c nct cii: e rya: " - f c DYE Y. { in ion for Sl ,.sb nb~ Park was _d can. n b r b )p S F ~e ;d.. B-- Lon r 0 _CIA. arc y I h Staf f d,,- ~il as a toed c led a' t T ind shrubs at Blue along L K All ° '.ization work is sc to begin in earl _ b_, i , i E >rior paint f 9 m or Df wit aunty Electric parks. m ti V/js CITY OF 19 G BJEC : REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, COMPREHENSIVE WIDE 1..AN AMENDMENT, CON!) TTGN °*aT.e USE PERMITS (E- .GA I)ALS CENTER 9 NDUST:R:I..AL PARK 9TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 5 EXISTING LNG: .1X qg"~~I (LIGHT & `+,,:5 i 4~ ~~.~x td ~s.S~6..C"l~F T (BEN I BUSINESS) 1Lt.9fi.s r s L~ INDUSTRIAL) L $:°ra_a a s, DATE OF i N ~ OCTOBER ~ ..Q,.$a L~Sd DATE OP REPORT: OCTOBER. 20, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION S0.,114MARN: Sepa yt £_s applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of ~ 8,38 L! and Gf 1iv' no a r..o ,i._.. Business , ' 1ned Development district and d Preliminary Flat 'L of 33.7 a ' s that includes this P. D. district with the ~a 25.3 L! acres for the Eagandale Center industrial Park 9th Addition. This piaL ?ii l c~, Az s: 6 industrial/commercial lots located W. the soli th a " , ° ' ction of Highway _33 and Lone Oak Road adjacent. to the e Bulk Wail Mai .E. f`.y9 Two Conditional Use Pc'y,..m t. are, t,t?i.; _ s car'~ for a pylon n sign and building height in excess of 35'. The janu.:7. _Tt 1987 , Land Use Plcf i.1 designates Q: h.i w area Light industrial. therefore. an Ameniment will be necessary, DENFEL P ENT CONCEPT: tat ni.. ? v` this primarily one?, ' d ~r w =.i'i~ atJ. c~ ~o-:~.L,t~ v ' ~,'sasTc~ Fr* ~ ~ F Y _ rs~ a ~9_'._- _f F_ I ~ f ..~`"Wat°_:;~. ~:t. C7 L} e c C;Aa t3`dt? _ -pJsFe, stX"£_t t,_ _ Tdle ":o, J ;u d ,.n1ust 7:._l /C JiCI31: z it iT.__ LanCd'. la,,es , r .,t.re.1'u. t._ <<at,o a?. t :Ltte C ? t L z s si-ttci 1.=f. r_e o no _i0s, r C? T_ , gY;.:f. f.. 3.~ x a 4,~ ~-g~ - C.. a C..3 C'! `t _L.1.t C., L ....:ra a e appro xi11t.e t:"sae£ai a. -~s i~~17 ' L ~ _ a =:`t`1 :Y_;.al 5.7~'~Enc.~ - -:its oit tlaE_ c-~Z`.1er of .i_af.nz: Y. a . {ma..~. _ ~ s> n- Lex.:.,i t_.:i cad, 1. z7ir`r - ti` t tie t _i.);_7.' ~ i4 a-h. ttz i... ~..ot~ ~ Gtl x 2.513 aC.. u 52 Ps_. pro os:. zomo ng ie .D woul..t.d coo nr Lots 1 arid. 2, r.:' ock £_an d Lot I_k lock . -i_'he 1.o. s ok' ._ng ;.s ca . akdoWn of t 55 1 t 7.. the 33.7 c e plat, f 1 r - t i 1.2 C:_n s f . a : 1.i < a' 1 F (no liquor) LLot 2 3.+.; 1* -!,iti _,.1 123 3to0111 65, 0100 S«F. o 3 ..L 4 . 8 A'u a H. a l F_ i: v. l u b o i. z.._ t O O Tech t.nd st ial 1 0 520,000 S® B o c }s Lot 1 3.8 Ac. office or Retail 45,000 LCt 2 _ . _ offi`~_'E` . t}a0t 0 S.t' is m z- e `clock Lot 3 . >_c . Of _ i'c.., oS_` ii777_t_-fi h r _ . a.- -.i. 5t 0 0 0 S . F Other than the hotel and _ potential supportive retail ,:-t. use on A Lot 1, L c,,ci,~ 2, all prop -~td uses are permitted ,proposes to i pla i'v he entire development into marketable t ~ _ ~ sites subject to Council review or 1i,: building proposal prior t issuance of a building permim _ The focus of this i '1~ v p _~-1 L will be LY tour story, 12:3 ror` i c, Hampton .L. ' . tW. 1 _ located adjacent to Highway 35E. Tht >:i F r. _t ..Ic 1?e t hC,: hotel within this ::Yg,t_:i!._a e Campus. is with _a e _ hD,,_. hotel s, 1 1"a Compri Hotel was designed with the business traveler m i n d , the Residence inn for more long r°' accommodations and Lhe Hampton inn wd i1 pr 1P,a€. 1 f:ort_ term accommodations for concerned traveler. Hampton inns are division of the .-i.'1 1i Corp )rut*1.,._.. 9. L, s. a nightly room price l0 the $40 Y"_angen ~.,...E ;js {1_0re are ~.1 El Hampton inns throughout the country and Usi.) 0110)11) be operable n y 1990, making them the largest hotel chain 111 the country. x :e continental breakfasts -s r provided at a! 1 Hampton inns, however no other eating or Liquor services are available. Co _Le there pro - -tyy o ext for look for Hampton ini_s, cep b... wilt require the addition of Mick _.or the IY;%1._t_I panels of Qse z building r~..! _..711Cj a>1_=_li the stucco like textured surface. The .Sa&> Pr71170 mansard 00 detail In continued through the entrance canopy area. SITE PLAN: f?t__E_ building 011!1 parking setbacks ,,met Code requirements as well as potential lot coverages for all 6 _o$=, `=a 138 park .1t1 S1 -a,_ 1is are required by Code, for Lhe hotel 12:3 9' wide c~. . pr-oposeL s however, there 1..;i proof of parking for an additional 116 spaces if necessary. The typical Hampton inn provides one `Lase per room. No shortage anticipated based upon comparisons with other metropolitan Octal a and the 9' stall w l d _ 1 at on±pr Hotel. The restaurant site , c't;iL7! allow for a 6a000 S.F. family orientM facility that would ;..:L serve liquor. The 1:3 ;J :1;a i~x roue 'Vert 1 this liJt and hopes to request Council approval in i`1a", s= control 0 future if the rezoning and platting applications are approved. '~,i 1.i 1.11,E anticipates the 0 lot oLat to be fully developed in a 3-- 1 year time period. AIRPORT NOISE; This site 1s boo . ad in Airport. _4 b$to Zone 4 an.o therefore subject to N r N (Noise Level Reductions) as monitored by the Metropolitan Council. Since the con-st.ruction of hotels; is generally a F of "+'a standard. they } °,~e tea` 11Cy.~. are . ca permitted use in all 2 zones even closer to the airport subject to an interior `'tiLi. or 20 f' 1b _ sQ The City Inspections Department and, NIOL Council will review the! plans and specifications 1]u} t 0d Li1 the Pu`."- L opf. a to- ensure compliance with that requirement. ~ r a 5 1 C- E E .n a_ s < _ of r _ j , ! . , Kim e'J u rd t _b v i_ .f _ e Wt h . _ , _ .x. Ono approve C...__ a g!'ci as .L?£Js3C w j _ _ tti 7i o, vex" xoc Lhe entry 0-) o`.' : . 1 = u a i w i l l s.. , 2 _a z e only. as will _ 1 . K,i t ~ -3 a M _a 1 for a ir_<<a t s in n__ i ts _'?S .e _.n... f a m Ham, <</7 } f i i} a. L-j. n 4 to the v . . , _ .a i.J ..l L c I ) t.< a t. z c n .l t n _ C. 1.. s, 1 nx c E s t a f f and a r c consistent with Previously opus, D !_<_y _t .,d plans for the hotel and - taua cx tl t site will be approved as .3R I)ING/ D3.'I,.AI AGE E . S. 'LOtI CONTROL: 1.L existing 1:. )po' h{ of t 4e propose~l development r..n Cram _ high sC`? 5 o _e ._t ;"tit of 932 in > 1 the northeasterly p o r t i o n of p (o . ? KI .r a 0o 3 p,; t , , , 0 a 1- r' y. 861 Q1 corner s building elevations of 890 in - portion eascarly of this site to a 1 p< 0._.x first _lo>>_ elevation of tpr_.a'1_„ in 1E_ in Lot 7. p These proposed 1 _e y_ i ._1 '1 t elevations _ l. i cats coo fill a The proposed grading plan calls foc qrading beyond the houndary A the proposed plat. Those z c_.. _ _ 3 i_ r'_, a__.`a _ e,v the plat Vil require a alope easoment from the affected pz-operty. The existing storm sewer system on 1-t one c< -oa 'L '_`1 C7 1_r v i ~ ' " t _ v in a the area 5 _ mi:, r < a lately adjacent the proposed plat, are - presently at capacity. No ; ' . . n 0 , _ generated 00 this development will be c z I (?-o,-_ rj to flow directly i 1. the storm sewer iY Lane Oar;. hem and F,i'_g`o:? Avenue. v,:i! y the street ana boulevard areas of Lone MY; o z ~d _ : _ 1..J l_, i 4 % v _ uIe C'13,' .11 _i k\' c~"] - l^ - s i"n into , uL_ n existing storm sewer systems is respective right-of-ways. At _ )01.0ii: approximately 100 south of 3 . 11.00 of 1,-, he 'c1 i ] , i, C? "t Avenue oA ._._I es C c'-.)aC increases -.L'L'oF - r- 70 \_Fa7a At to iC1~.1~1_x that point, the existing flow into the S rm sewer system 1; approximately F CPS which leaves 20 C-' c` 10b for the proposed development. i . U t F oT d_ ii 7 will M. required to limit _ hs proposed runoff generated .11 lv cib_ 20 .,FS, T11 development 1 Cia'.,-.tpc}sLry_3 p1110 _ on Lot T_€ Block 3; Lot 2, Block 1; and Lot 3, Block 1. A detailed analysis of thes pond i n=y 0 . _ as not performed this time. An existing 12 storm sewer O force 001 1 which provides the outlet for o_ DP on the Bu IX M a i l s C presently drains across the sout'l s1!Jf_, of Lot 3. Block 1. When Lot 4 develops, the existing 12" line should be p10000 U and drained to Ponad DP-19. Runoff generated by, not 3 Block 1p is required to be conveyed to Pond DP-19. r:ie ?i.. '3oa a; storm sewer on Hampton Drive along the :gin out.li:3`3tJr Lv ~ c FL.,r 'a 3_ side of s~,_ e Block s is riot 1t.q(e L_.e_.z _ . This _ _ ;E.' :'xossea, the . 4r ~`;L )-1 ~-3 S' a on the Comprehensive Morin, drainage ;i_ , boundaries are ~C_~ ~.FL~tt Sewer Guide. Time drainage from the e.11 r_,=,1: off of i-35 E will need be picked i up when Lots 3 and d 4 of Block _ develop. T h i s runoff w i l l ;;i:.. directed to the southwest into Pond DP-19. An incomplete erosion and sediment control la-I11 was submitted with, the -,1_lill rl3.concern 3. i)I'r__~ ~"i.~-_ plat _ application. The main water quality t~t~;1 0.- this ` site is the effect the development O i. 1 have on L;_'ba0 Lake. i s. i o _ t o ~ i s t__ i r 7, : ii o 1 Y'? t o pia r--, MI, i 1 y , a k. F a r , , .1 e s t o r Irt a t c, r w i 1 L ? . r ..i v.iqsi Ponds DP-3 and DP'-19w The nutrient removal efficiencies of these of i s will teed to be cloy Let: m l 1(0d in, e111 1i _.2a to L,eM.Ly Lake w i l l not occur as a result excessive nutrient loading of the site development. S e drainage _1;1.r1:(g Con.(t Ct10I and Aria_ to storm s tip,<_... installation w i l l be to the east along Lone 3?_}t Poogad and to the southwest .a I (1 1-35E. prop or erosion _ control s ue non! to ' and f too ie LF C.L tYPILI-VIES: , i lrunK X4;1 ar x''", behnq PKnanKed e_ m kho nq - w ! - .L. main'' Lon. Road, Oak _1L - as side 54 and _xt nj_nn this antar .r KnLweon and Yanka,l Donlin Mai, past at 1-351, am! west of LaxinqMn Av2nnp. in + s "ice e c; pule n, t *k' r'-L ..1.°r r , ,c I. b-. i eC__.n the proposed L trunk water in Hampton Drive and tile adequate water servica. ,,arty _ y Sewer seY i ` ,t1 m .I 4a"._ donth is d51>,7_l, i _b_._ t. oa ,_z l y ijO WE L_. a 0n rLnUP. The proposed sanitary extensions , Drive n i z d YQ17 are lateral seNar Me proposea development. 4:.a'laR ax E T S / lA $1 t.<a.x '".'a a., I :aC IU 1- 7',, 'z 10 M^.. i s__ to [)._o t development shown in two locations. proposed Hampton L s ' H`c.' on :_~as".' _ _.rl;. The A >t:C._1 W. `C<<t.- .ctA_'., _,a i i ,to_I sit, E~tx'IL. w i l l be a! !owed full access. 1 v wn Drive _ _ < _ 1 o t o n Way h r e qu,L. n 0 ri -,v!C--,- ys an-, proposed to ..7 sr_u- vd t''.>' the southerly j. ~p Ee-,F t y e r`~ temporary cu ry, ac will b required to be constructed at the south end of Hampton Drive. Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Bs ck 29 wi~t be a !owed dI. Ny-'ke-iV access - to Hampton Way in ~I?~. Location 1._"YO>>i_ ..,i ~__~;1 other. Li"1F? _s t_: :D .1 3. C''`l ~ r a c ce s ? ; ~ « t L ire, p o _ 17 u: 7 \7 E_ i. . v ; d I. 1 b ti L_ [1 f= t2 roadway. 1 be Vii. ! ;',4'}'L11 CCe ,,s to ii-r1 ' I i - o z a .o r, o p',) : s , . each other. . ) v ± location 1 1 I access point is at a point ,t!x012 7 1pr?'_ }X_ [i x_.e]_... _ o I a m i'' X n ~,£ez' y The v;t'y _ J :I I- he £1i,7. ? T". t~ from :=1 Yir Oak thirls distance is requirod from Lone Oak Ron& Lo Lot 2, B C.._a 1, w._ _ bp _1 kowed in a loi a i on which Ls _H-' _ t . 21''f £1 1 p' ; T Way. rJ. 1 i _ :.1, m e _ x - _ _ a 0,111- require -TC,1 1 F. a_ i I - _1 , at the _ s '3x1,2 oti. Ieve I a „ proposed ~t7 an Lot and ~o' of 2 ~ ~ -?is }i. 1. 5 Drive ~ g HI to 3 Hampton will allowed ic-,,c.atic- which is oppositc a common shared access to Lot 2 and Lot 3, both in BLock L. 1 5101 NTS 2JG1HT- OP -W Y/PERMITS: Slope sE',trt,...- will be required, from ad env properties he L'.1.. proposed grading exceeds limits of the o ,c~,_~ development. _'C._ proper etc .L i ea i,.,..._!e. proposed _ _ .__2 required or se7 xti"C Ain-.. which serve A. than one user, The ponding eas2menLs are required to limit ' ' t Fri m the shoe to i 20 a rl c-z ta. _.L: Way ,A1 s3 Ham'_ on n. ive .r.. required to have _ve 70' "l `J','n t"'C':. ways t _ ? y , _ ,c_ t Ior~ CORK ROM and 60' ..a , ia,e, Restricted .1 > is require! to the lots aLonq4 the entire boundary . ) t < Lr ,.Jne Oak Row a L., i. xaq'_o!. Avenue. ,t l L e~ T r L _ , r r s c.,. , _ n L, D r 1 its . , _ 11 L r,.9 e , to i r r:a :i r t. h r ~ ' `3 = ~ ' ~ L ~ $ appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. m Ta"' parcels that are proposed to be platted _?ati7e bee-) ASS.-..SE311LsTSa s _'iA=I sewer trunk, storm sower trunk, 1_au r;_3_ bone firam r wauar main < t a i... Avenue street assessments at 450 of. 4_-`.e., actual cost. T, storm 1~ )s. " L. i~ site is a e_ t' t ~ 3 per~~_a~.. n~.g sewer trunk assessment under Project 372. The following c_ s'v_s..A.:'°"1'U., are r .s-.., as -i _i i_ L'Jn of final pl:.t.; approval: PROJ DESCRIPTION e TY 28 Lateral Benefit w i.21 Water _eT. ._,in S20, 737.62 f f $15,15S Lone PeP Road' 8? _ ' 892.62 f 73,5755 10Lexington Avenue Upgrade 45a 3: ff 817 If 37,00) A04 .,ex1_ gi-o;} Avenue 3 I a.01 J f 200 .C1 1•414 104 Lateral Benefit Trunk Storm Sewer ff 1.a23t If 2,-3 `Z'r A d,ay 12,4ti 781,62 I 22,15) TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $168,008 The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in e f [ne at thei n e tof f w tan 1 1? !at ap pr' J ',i ca. _ s€(! 4 i ti s ~t on t 1 ail a. -1 3_ a i. dimensions and areas. CONDITIONS ,p1`'~i,.£'n ~rD4 y3.2 L.ta 9TH ~tX ADDITION): 1. ALI standard platting conditions shaLj oe adhered toagreement shal 1 to eAt2red into for th',-, pMae Lots ; - - - M , $2.so S.Y. Ono time sign fee, .anod /approved hy the AP-- and Council prior T the ..,_:.!a..?ce of i.y bu,. i_i.?g Vrmiwa a The > , _1r 1 ..C'. ti; and size A A . ~ i number i ~ i.'. approved : ~ ~-'i~~. the, . 1 i o r).T.ii r ed into the Vt_i Ming design -o st l ,te WIM the same material as the buildinn. The storm sewer 5'u!',.L11 aa oVU I to ti cC'_ l qi. I nun the Lexington, o',iI Ve storm sower is limited to 20 Len. S. The stDcA watar ranoff generated by Lot 3, Mock L. is rnquire~] Vond i; Driveway _ _ and Himpton L Way are identinhco m the staff report. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PIAT '4 - x A g. a e . ^ 7"1 This . _ t shall z i.... _ j 201itknial a _ ° _ s . _,..w_. ineflectat the Know final r ~?T This Svc r en shall - 10' drainava and ntilit'Z, e n s censored ovor all am..- n lot lines "n'.; i',_ This development shall C.' _ ' V .i or L1 its, costs (K additional 1' ai A qL , Z l A ai no C i 4., v % . a as requirad 1q, ti.spacity of all rcquircd t ' 1 , -1: s C` n { P 1 on this -'-Lat servico this development. z 9 T 1 - Pandinq e elovation 11eC ss t_ 1 by City storm water storage Volume requirements, C. 1 Lr.r' and Sr,C""IC 1c t x.t:JI.y> L. A public streets and u- s< t°,.t this clove lopmant Via 1 L i designod by A -s _d professional .'i: rliec.. in accordance with City c _ _ E- and r~ Ya ~ i'<t:: _ - i 12 T standards and policies, and, "PC' ovo by sta_a f ? e_ _C:J:~ to final plat - .°Uv_i_a . L ~<A rT y _x ' d g ~ r i n a f c J erosion, a....+ sediment CA v - + ...1.. a J a n3 it prvt_t A h'li staff iZ_' to f1 a1. Plat approval. t} public , shall Ci ; r ciny , ° 7 , P-, plan Win! 1 be submittod On the proposed q adinq p! .Y1 1<1.~ approved to r t4e -i r._ ,1 _ r-,r _.~Gc.4 1}u f i tic i. ._a. in 1 ouzir,111 „ _ =ll,i1 >J E' r 4 , i z C_ i La s t' .i 1_ i 1 t ! _ t, Pr . 1 <'I' :'I i_' C C , t _ C _ , C1 o until onc year 1 L C:-.L t,. t, C3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO I All. internal public: an p- i ai- a streets shall use constructed within h required right-05-way in accordanco with Ciny design standards. D, Public Li a -,F `s'e menu I it any public ° ' r, a W.c:u> a ~t ~ prior = i-a'~ L:.~ 1. , a„ ° plat - s r z E. Permits 1 This t1F-<., , or' ,`~~nt F a l v.a~..z_b, be e_ --CSW,,i,. Cr for the acquisition ¢ all b C7 't? vto..;-. . or,' agency po mits in the atime frame a by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development H11.0211 its paQvs dedication, requirements enc,-,t s n! by tht~ and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. Pt i... A .i_ S I ' l 4, r t, rig a n e C z n Cp C. . 0 T is s 11 a L 1b yiddiC? r€ i ;O Lin! o s spec f_ r a LILy granted a variance y Council action. Advisoryn Planning Commission City Council Approved: Revised- STANDARD 'T OF: 9 AG CENTE JL. AK NO. I COUNTY S7ATE AID HWY NO 26 OAK K p 2.4 .~e~. ` ! ~ F !1!D Yb ~ 4 a. - N 77 rc T LO t LOT 1 LOT ,n r,d Q~ 4 s< 311 sc n. I ,a G r ~ ~l 1 z er~Fry 4 WAY;`- e t f se9~4n'zz ~ oa I O i LOC-AT16N MAP u j e ~~r} y ~ „ I Lips 6 ~I - $-49 45,W M., 6EE. 6f+e r P.io _ P7GF(UN EFiP 61E$T." - F gex. r r-io rol- F,i.Euaruxs n LONE OAK ROAD uEunnoun^ SITE SUMMARY 3 7 ZONING SSIFICAT1ON: Comm./Industr. r -4- ~-w s.~ ::eA _ = I TOTAL SITE AREA. t 184,230 SF. r P-o roa ae 4 e1~ S ~ 1 r I HOTEL SITE AREA f 127,060 S .F. Q~ / 4A' I 1 Ifs ( I~ s HOTEL FOOTPRINT: 16,318 S.F. W} fir,' w a BUILDING COVERAGE: 18,918 S.F. e I( ( ~a' € % LOT COVERAGE 15% HOTEL ROOMS 123 - TOTAL o~~~ PARKING SUMMARY °,Q OOe HOTEL 123 CARS PROOF OF PARKING 16 CARS ~P 14 TOTAL 139 CARS PARKING REQUIRED: 139 Wau1• Sib*1 5 5cE 3H• !4 ~ t P_ro Fo,e stale t p~,t~ v~mee1 i (1/UNIT + 1/ADD. 8 UNITST- o w ~~P fey a. ( k y 1 y s RESTAURANT: 81 CARS O4.g REQUIRED g a ' $ 4 EY NOTE: ALL PARKING SPACES ARE 9'X19` UNLESS NOTED \Mq'^+TiaNT SIMJY OTHERWISE d • ~ siz6<~.cw.r+o.+G' 3 ffi SITE PLAN z 7 ~ tue a Q Q Z NORTH dy" . £ g Liu r \ ~ \ II~\\o(y\V~~ .10 91 O `l 1 a did p w. as « HAMPTON INN Reve,one m c-1 EAGAN,MK n'+ ;M Cnxkrtl trY Lm+o~..d i"Y§°%..k P"9 p-&~ LONE OAK ROAD SITE SUMMARY m ZONING Q, CLASSIFICATION: Comm.lhdustr. TOTAL SITE AREA: t 184,230 S.F. CPJ A = o~ I U z HOTEL SITE AREA f 127,060 S.F. HOTEL FOOTPR INT: 16,318 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE. 18,918 S.F. % LOT COVERAGE 15% HOTEL ROOMS 123 t v ` r TOTAL HOTEL AREA 65,272 S.E » gg~~` t REST. SITE AREA t 57,170 S.F. PLANT LEGEND RESTAURANT FOOTPRINT 6000 S.F. % LOT COVERAGE 10.5% SNIADI TREES 2 112' **L SO ' MGa.u.e•. MF .nc Y1V°YiMi \``1~ /a^~ / R~ ot,- PARKING SUMMARY ILO WERikO TREES- 1 1/2' "IL an c.•..».., s...ws. n..+•a op, op, HOTEL 123 CARS ,dry PROOF OF PARKING 16 CARS 0 c PER TREES - S Aa an B4 G TOTAL' 139 CARS. PARKING DECIDUOUS SHRUBS - I r %L ..L / 5 1INN REQUIRED: 139 r ce•+ ~ - (1/UNIT + 1/ADD. 8 UNITS _ . rsns*ua..neu. ~ e ~pO Q~, i ~ 1 I - ~ yygg - ErSR®aEEM SHRUBS as• IRS. seat. R~`"• y I + m RESTAURANT: 81 CARS FLOWERS w rww. nac s LA REQUIRED T'om' ROCK MULL MADfr-mOr NOTE: ALL PARKING SPACES ARE. 9'X19' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ~ NOTE, BOULYnnn LAXDSCAP%#G TO CONFORM l ems, TO LANDSCAPE MASIERPI.AM CSREiEXMY OEM DEVELOPED. T LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH 3~ f I ~ V7 LT v 7- 1 1 _v 2-5 56'&n HAMPTON INN F''_} EAGAN, MINNESOTA *••nw ~«m« o- pa iMn~ .mob kA .,..x FIRST FLOOR PLAN IL E 27 =4 ~t4 r _ . II - T, 1 J1 Ana i f a~ e~ ® a Inc n is a rN OY a Olw~ Nu. prgecr Jo0 Na PrW Mgr. Peviaion® HAMPTON INN ~}G EAGAN, MINNESOTA a*w awcx.a oy 1-21 CORPORATION P5 Txw aw vnnwa DEARS- BLA-OERS OEVEUDPERS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4r R p pox 150, Minneeppllp, MN 55440(612)038-4444 MEMO TO C. HALL, yyD 7i ADVISORY PIANNING COMMISSION ROM n PLJ NN ..N~C Dl. PAIITME T DATE: OC°ro3 22, 1987 SU aa. a.CT; CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL CM C =ATU AI:) 1: .1C (PREVIOUS US CEDAR C D_I IP S Y c..° ~ 9 E 00 PARK 3RD ADDITION) August 25, L967, this item was denied tl)c AP C d n l for a '1 e0 r F City : i meeting. Prior to Wat meeting, the aDplication requirements ana process. ' ee City Attorney's office reviewed the applications and determine`.._ a t 2_. s G:~ _ - tl g -in i3Ii L. f t. '-.0 insure prop2r legal notification prior to going to the Council, this item was rescheduted for a pubirin nearing at the OcLober 29, 1987 APC meeting. Staff recommends that the application iiiiiS,.'. be changed from the Cedar Cliff i_ L,tL 1mC- uci<s S, Pack r.__ Addition to the 4th Addition in d order keep our filing system ui order. staff }c , c ? i h._ o f1.j? A report for ! 3 e Auto Center, an @10. . v showing h c l ,_i..nsb 1 r: o '_h day care facility and Auto `M _ a U petition from residents of the ar.- a ,"t, x 1. ; i their eii a.:J ti rot t s _.1 i i lA 1 to t. .I: fro ! a e i v i o x ..7. ! 1 J- t.. ,-I n owners of kho Auto Cenvor Lot. SUBJECT: PD D LC 2 'ENT, L. CO DITIC JSE PL' IT ? CEDAR CL._Lx a' C01,1MEINCItils PAi , i_ r t ux Ii: it APPLICANT: AUSTIN COIMPNNIES LOCATIO : OUTLOT A, CEDAR CLIFF CC, 7 SE 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: WITHIN CEDAR CLIFF C ,.-u: I.~"_ PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting, a Planned Development Amendment to allow an automotive sir 'ire r'rt on LB (Limited Business) designated land within the Cc,or Cliff Commerical Park P.D. and a Preliminary Plat for the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. This 1.83 acre one lot plat is located on the north side of Cliff Road between Cliff Drive and Scott Trail and is currently a portion of Outlot A of the 1st Addition. Immediately to the north is the Building Block Addition (d center). Before any final approvals can occur in that area, storm water issue must be resolved. In an effort to do so, a Building Block Addition will be replatted into the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 4th Addition as Lot 1 and the remaining area to the northwest will become Outlot A with a drainage and utility easement for the ponding area. It is anticipated that the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 4th Addition will be scheduled for the September APC meeting. SITE PLA (CODE CO FORMA CE: This 15,170 SF automotive service center will have four main tennants: Tires Plus, Lavells Auto P--lar ;.o (retail sales only), Muffler Pro and an undetermined user. A sfroile access from Cliff Drive matching that of the shopping center to the west will serve this site. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements. Sixty-seven exterior parking stalls have been provided and eighteen are proposed as service bays within the building (85 total). If a strict 'retail only' sales parking ratio were used, 101 stalls would be required. At the 30,000 SF Car Care Center along Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive, 143 stalls were approved in that site plan. That also included 19 that would be shared with a proposed restaurant site. Austin Companies is also proposing a similar 17,000 + SF project in Eden Prairie with 88 stalls. It appears that parking should be sufficient for this proposal since most uses are short term and the total 'retail only' space is 5,870 SF. All stalls are 10' wide except for the 26 designated employee only ones on the rear side of the building. The lot coverage is 19% in a 20% (LB) district. The building itself will be constructed of face brick, precastd concrete and prefinished aluminum. The proposed main color will closely resemble the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center adding to the continuity of the Planned' Development. The applicant is aware that no roof top mechanical equipment shall be visible. The trash will be contained completely in the building and no exterior storage has been proposed. The landscape plan works well conceptually - all sizes and species are acceptable. The proposed pylon sign is located on the southeast corner of the site - over 300' from the shopping center sign. The detailed design has not been completed but all code requirements would be adhered to. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROS IOCONTROL: The proposed auto mall site occupies Lot 1 of the proposed Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. Lot 1 is bounded by Cliff Road on the south, Cliff Drive on the west, and Scott Trail on the east. The proposed grading plan generally conforms to the existing grades of Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. Drainage along the northerly edge of Lot 1 is proposed to be provided by a deep swale into which all drainage from Lot 1 and Lot 2 is directed. This drainage swale is shown initially to drain northwest into a regraded portion of the existing pond. When the outlet to Pond AP-50 (lying easterly of Scott Trail) is provided in the future, the drainage from Lot 1 and Lot 2 is required to be directed east into Pond AP-50. Considering the elevations proposed for the Building Block Child Daycare Center on Lot 2 and the auto mall on Lot 1, this alternate is the most feasible permanent drainage plan for these two lots. The study of the outlet to Pond AP-50 has considered this eventuality. The developer shall escrow the necessary funds to provide the required storm sewer and to fill and relandscape the swale in the future when the Pond AP-50 outlet is constructed. The storm sewer system which conveys the water from the drainage swale between Lots 1 and 2 into the proposed pond on Outlot A will need to be abandoned at that time. No grading plan for the ultimate use of Lot 3 is provided. Much of the existing lower area on Lot 3 and on Outlot A is shown to be regraded to provide a small but deep detention pond. The bottom elevation of the pond is proposed at elevation 888.0 and the overflow outlet elevation is proposed at 900.0. (The pond outlet is connected to the storm sewer system which ultimately discharges into Pond AP-9.) A pond with a depth of approximately twelve feet below the outlet is of questionable value for storm water drainage purposes. It is recommended that the bottom elevation be raised to approximately two to three feet below the controlled outlet elevation. This proposed elevation is low enough to receive storm water temporarily from Lots 1 and 2 and can ultimately serve as a permanent ponding area for the balance of this site. The dependable storage volume of this pond is not increased by the proposed greater depth. A permanent ponding easement should be provided for the pond and the maintenance of the pond should remain with the property draining into it. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this application. UTILITIES: The existing sanitary sewer and water lines in Cliff Drive are of adequate capacity and depth to serve this development. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to access to the site from westerly adjacent Cliff Drive in location. Dakota County will be requiring dedication of r r° access along the entire border with Cliff Road. Traffic circulation throughout the site can be easily accomplished for cars and single-axle trucks without encroachment into the parking stalls. A semitrailer-type unit would not be able to make turning maneuvers without encroachment into the parking stall areas. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS: The proper easements w i l l e -required for the proposed pond, its outlet, and for the fca z r_e st1- )tw sewer to be constructed in the swale between proposed Lots 1 and Adequate street rights-of-way have been provided for Cliff Drive Scott Trail. Adequate right-of-way is shown to be provided with tie platting to accommodate Cliff Road. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired from the appropriawe agency in the proper time frame. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for platting as Cec ti Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition has been assessed for the following public utilities at the commercial/industrial rate: sanitary sewer trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk, sanitary sewer lateral benefit, water lateral benefit, water area upgrade, and water lateral benefit. The proposed parcel will be required to pay its proposed a sesm t for trailway along Cliff Road as a condition of final plat approvfe. L. The trailway assessment is identified at the rate of $12.49 per front foot for the frontage along Cliff Road which is 285.38 front feet. The rate and the total front footage equate to a total proposed assessment of $3,564.00. All final assessment obligations will be calculated on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PK 3RD ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No exterior storage, sales or displays shall be permitted. 3. No roof top mechanical equipment shall be permitted. 4. The pylon sign shall be no taller than the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center sign and contain no more than 125 SF of signage per side. All building mounted signage shall be compatible and uniform in size. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 SF. --5. The detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until 1 year after the date of installation. 6. 26 employee parking stalls with a 9' width shall be permitted. 7. The development shall be responsible for the cost of construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff from Lots 1 and 2 into the existing storm sewer system in Scott Trail when the outlet for Pond AP-50 is constructed. 8. The proposed pond bottom elevation shall not be more than three feet below the controlled water elevation of the pending area. 9. The development shall modify its proposed site plan to provide adequate room for turning maneuvers of tractor/trailer-type unit. 10. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 11. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private prbperty or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of--' and temporary slope easements for ultimate developmer_. a adjacent roadways as required by the appropriat jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements~to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designs-<1 by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to f.i l plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: Revised: STANDARD LTS`2 i• • .o .w mf w °Vt m e® ~~Mlb'O 91, .1 I./ i e t is el, 6 9 wd ~d.•e N N Sy ih•" i '•"i ~~.n > ,3.9.63 _ y ~ ~1 1 'cam W /!3. ao ' o e y ® rhJ ~"C} • ° , t ® Q 4 qb b Z+ff c® cE yeQ d , ti. v tR e 3'r 3. 4B r ,f S CLIFT--- COMMERCIAL °o = IZZ 7: t v HI-i Oi gy~A a ~'s :ar s.y~a.•,9ax 0. r^~zJ aigti:.r <u,nc.. B -~.am':.+:-r-.-..>,.-.. ^.+---•-~....a f a~ ~nu,n f 0 3 r-1 i »wPOYIj j k^+ab ~ smi•u/~I ~Q es ww nw~7 Wj, Y-~ Q rHopO fl DAYCARK CSN & r e..Y.:.s•yK... Key t+ • y are..: U... n.alarr n... -.6-- 1JTTR41RT[11THH ewr. B.=.. 4~ ~tlliy 8a4iaa TtaaY R.4i . n«a.~ e. a { ~t In * Mrn G'+P~ Ia-ae 1 t ~ ~y r Autn all BuildiIE I 8e,1- Cu Cars Bs,' GF1M~D ii Yf/ ( - Q that! a1. OntSA YM9 a.t } dab P.r4 YNa1Y ye c."F Nr+i`) a"~1 BIla: roou t1i6 al. ~ ~ w-~t ~'~~«w v-. 7 Tt- Pto e.ua 6st1.4 La E?'_.. W* bee0 al a~ l.• . P. ~ ~.r9+••!` Site & Utility Plan Data } qq n. _ rvrxc t 8atidtac A[.a ~ _ 7 --r ks 'r'.r-t F cc ~+fnnw s..F+Yf ' Aate B.r:las= 9600 Nn. 5610 Ntt. T.4.1 Aran. 16110 sJt N *3 Jul. A»ta q} Arr.a Y.6! urw ii . ff r A 1. Pers..t or B.11di.9 c..... ta P.r}Fat Nega7»d 71 HN.ud P. rt lot Proridad 6 Yra.id.d b. odlaag 8t.li. P[a.id.d ! } ~ t - Pn 7U.. - er rrS.+n.tnMe H-k ~«g Cliff Road ( it C~J! 1 " DIAL PARK SITE & UTILITY PLAN DE4rT O "rN 13 , AUSTIN SMITH & LEO T. "U12CHT .._...._..W.~.._ 87 :14 SNID+ .itl, Ia tN-'-E,: .ayt _ 4-.a vl 0 t0 Y0 40 16i1)635-v trot PAW M LOT 9I9YAT70N AT DAY CARL . ,~~¢v rwo,.Wwiw.+o h8 ns.•,t - i~ • • , RNTX$ TO aX aLY AT N11L' 01,v J, I '{~to Mall Building f i/!t ~i+t~ • ~"4WR 6NATION W & A f .i t 1 ! ~ ~ \V -I~ A r t; ` y i t ! - ~~I t LFE- It-L-L- CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK NoRru THIRD ADDITION GRADING /DRAINAGE PLAN EAGAN AUTO MALL LA0AN. YTNNLt*)TA c~ h1?ikD-Ot f+r r+r n w woe ( SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (CUTTER'S RIDGE 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NE 1/4, SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 27, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 21, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 3 A (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition. This plat consists of 11 lots on 4.35 acres that also includes the 1.35 acre Outlot A of the 1st Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road and north of Deerwood Drive. This plat is in conformance with the January 1987 Land Use Plan that designates this area as D-II (0-6) units/acre. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: The original concept plan for the Cutter's Ridge Additions was revised prior to the Advisory Planning Commission meeting in July so the street connection to the Horne property on the north could be made. The preliminary plat of the lst Addition was modified slightly eliminating the stove pipe lot along Pilot Knob Road - a reduction of 1 lot. The 2nd Addition picks up that lot, therefore the number of lots originally planned for the 20 acres remains at 47. This site consists of mostly open grassland with a hardwood tree stand along the southeastern portion of the plat. There is an existing home site on Lot 2, Block 4, that meets all Code setback requirements. The lots vary in size from 12,000 SF - 22,300 SF and the gross density of the plat is 2.5 units/acre. Since the existing home is on a lot under 1 acre in an R-1 district, it will have to either connect to City sewer and water or be granted a Variance to maintain its well and septic system. The address for that home will also be changed from its current one along Pilot Knob Road to one on proposed Street W. GRADING/ DRAINAGE/ EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan provides for street grades in accordance with City of Eagan standards and generally conform to the existing contour of the land. The proposed grading plan complies with the City's maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria. The grading at the westerly end of street 'A' is shown on property outside of the proposed plat boundary which requires a slope easement from the westerly adjacent property. In addition, the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac is required at the westerly end of street W. Either an easement from the westerly adjacent property is required to construct a temporary cul- de-sac or Lot 1, Block 5, should be platted as an outlot to accommodate this temporary cul-de-sac construction. Drainage on this site is proposed to be conveyed by the storm sewer provided in Street 'C' of Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. Conditions relating to drainage in the staff report of Cutter's Ridge 1st Addition Preliminary Plat must be complied with to ensure proper conveyance of storm water runoff generated by the proposed 2nd Addition. An erosion and sediment control plan, including both a site map and narrative, must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is propsed to be extended from Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. The sanitary sewer in Street 'A' shall be extended to the west line of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition to provide continuation of service to the westerly adjacent property. The sanitary sewer in Street 'C' south of Street 'A' is not required to be extended to the south lineof the plat. It is anticipated the property southerly of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition will drain southerly to the existing sanitary sewer in Deerwood Drive. Water main to serve Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is proposed to be extended from Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. The 12" trunk water main in Street 'B' and 'C' of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is properly shown. However, the 12" trunk main in Street 'B' within Cutter's Ridge lst Addition shall be extended to the westerly plat line as opposed to Pilot Knob Road. This 12" trunk main will ultimately be extended northerly across I-35E as part of the utility extensions to serve Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street circulation and access to Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition is provided by the proposed streets of Cutter's Ridge lst Addition. However, as previously mentioned, a temporary cul-de-sac at the westerly end of Street 'A' is required. A temporary cul-de-sac is not required at the southerly end of Street 'C' because no driveways are proposed to access onto Street 'C' south of Street 'A'. EMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PE ITS: This development is responsible for its proportionate share of the costs associated with easement acquisitions for sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer extensions beyond its plat boundaries. Also, the development will be responsible for acquiring the easement necessary to construct the temporary cul-de-sac at the westerly end of Street 'A'. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: A portion of the parcels proposed to be developed as Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition were previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area and storm sewer trunk. The proposed development shall assume its proportionate share of the pending assessments against the underlying parent parcel for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road under Project #466. The development shall be responsible for the following proposed assessments as a condition of final plat approval: PROJ t DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT 88 Water Area $1,250/ac 1.02 $1,275 297 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 28,908 1,532 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $2,807 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quanti c iL s and dimensions in the final plat and in accordance with the ra:_-s in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: CUTTER'S RIDGE 2ND ADDITION 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The existing home on Lot 2, Block 4, shall change its address to be consistent with the others along Street W. 3. The existing home shall either connect to City sewer & water or else be granted a Variance from the R-1 1-acre without sewer and water minimum lot size requirement. 4. The approved conditions for Cutter's Ridge must be complied with as a condition of Cutter's Ridge 2nd Addition final plat approval. 1 1 ~ ~I , t ~1 j ~,35 f'1 ~ t p 'T'l~ ~ II-'r ~ ~ l { ti' DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY % l > t / ' + Total Acres 17.02 AC RA.W. 4.172 AC Al" Lots 37 I l Acres Single Family 11.81 AC y r t Average Lot Size 13,670 SO FT r i i 1 i t 1t+ Outlet A 1,35 AC t `tI - j Yry C ' ^x a S ODUat B .04 AC A r u' 5 _ Ffl R- U~.~ DENSITY PF Gross 2.2 U/AC Net a l Less ROW 28 UlAC ar Cana-- sa ac - -r ~ J~ 5 4~ 5 8 t g. "fl~ r10-` ~ ft ;~tz A ~bq Existing Zoning -R1 i f}D- S } f f s "a'' L, t cwt o + acP Ala Rm no ~.p o E.,~w4 t R-1 TYPICAL LOT & SETBACKS 5 s{ i a Site F } lr pBIO rr 14 Rezoned to R-1 STREET 8' 13 o- / / l ff \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION C { 1 ~f 3 4 5 8 7 9 ~z2 Ak-- W 2 F n eA i - - r! r 4 ~i +Y r t ~l HORLH Sia Oi TttF -U-FIT ti Cr 7 ~r~ +~s16 f i. -4 ~4 f Swf z>'A I t E OE ttfE HOn THEnsi e~A EACCPT rteE 1,2 y+~ ( „ t 4 )ft N r--t`Y5f 33fi£ET O E PO THE EOST'i~l $r ~O S1 T1.1 F-T NORTHEA4 O SECTION 11, t 1F f v f S THE 3>r RANGE p3 12 F{ 11 rr.10 J 81.QGG A 3 `ri t# rr. };">s a u s 4 i e 1 t ti.vlt µ10~~~,4 E3 €TM SeM . - 4 6 'n ri mom fEETl STREET CC a > } t Jai TBOC i "p"4`'~,."..~-.'/ CUT EERA'S RIDGE BC 5 t 7 _3 ~3 8 8r / / r as a PRELIMINARY PLAT ter:.......... :i tl GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CO. 100ErGPARKWAY 42To - }-~CRSO E~r~* t(( l GE 7 ~T { _ 1 _ } ( ` / `nm a t Hidden Valley ,Yr \ \ RID MlA Ut 1 4 \ 2l I + " 6 Delve FF,T L , ' V /j /~A } \ ( / \ ` - EGOnitgttr~t 47fltjfr tlf faf { I . •A 1-__ ry _ i y ~t^ ~ ~t L 71 / ii ~ ¢I PLArItiER: £N _ -NE, ROBERT IE / L~ , l ;t 9 2p25 EAST NENreEPM AYE PISS wAYZATA BlY6, . • ' • } t µt J! Y' MMNEFPOLf3, Mk l3A 13 MINNEA 1, MM 53 b 0t Nut dt A. 1.Ja At C I \ { ~"T l F _ ~ Y _ ! / Y rf f{ 4 ~ { UP It i { HE;=3 " floniny iric[Symbof DATE: o-ra-ro.. zj ii r r-r-ave RE V District Boundary i.i ~-Cutter w ill be > Ci nul Pot.- r4onyy ~/f t PD DA 9 0 25 50 inn 200 FEET 71 SCALE r~50 ktst F7- ff, 7.7 77 71 ~ ~ l t.~r f _ btu ,~...~.7.' • , i -°~i~~,~ ~ T9o-~3.~', r~/ ,/'1~ • (~"j, / f + - '..trtL._..~. r9201 j. r {jj fry - ? c'~j'7~~c r . r it -~+~,,.,Yf D ~S ^ A 1' `L.~ I \ r I , J } ( J. rJ.""1 ;J:L r' = t^' ~.f= - -"'f ~J1 ~ {n x.153 f ? r ~ -,r~! i 1 y L 1 J3l Ir r ."a•'''•••'if.'~ .1 r. 1.4 / L i °Y - TSB r'' -t ' ' •`€?.~.;~;,:1.,.,.~:;.: g 'r _ t rzx fix. Y FJ t r•0y T90 . fit , .'fit.'.'.-.'.-.. ; ' • _ r , , '""'a ~~•..~"`,~\`e; ;'x.12 h ~i, f~ .r.: / .r•ri,. , ° aF` --}y T, ~ /r( r. J.....~.• . ~ d ..il ri:<~r:':~:•'.~:-. pt:, ~ttY, ~3a®- \ ~~~•i~ZJ.,•J1 ~I ~1~ i' '.•r. Y'. .•.i..........,a... _ ~I{ r `:I~v i. 4;>'t - is h v \ t rr Al~ar . ~z -c.s at ~9mOp ® oo<ao r ~.c x pGa~wm z , o 0 CL S'j rv k C-4 1-04 n N c =c°" ca > WATER AREA n i~ <<fi m ATE LATERAL BENEFIT STORM SEWER TRUNK j Y IH ~