The URL can be used to link to this page

01/08/1987 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission AGENDA ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA Thursday, January 8, 1987 7:00 P.M. Eagan Municipal Center Lunch room - Lower level A. Call to der and Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda and Approval of Minutes of Meeting of December 4, 1986. C. Development Proposals 1. Boulder Ridge 2. Town Center 70 - 7th Addition 3. Eagan Hills Farm P.U.D. D. Old Business: 1. Park Naming 2. Trails Plan - Updating E. New Business 1. State of the Parks - 1986 Report 2. Section 14 - City/School Property development - Mueller site 3. Property Assessments - Parkland 4. Public Works projects and parks input: 479 485 F. Parks Development 1. Carnelian Park - Set meeting date for neighborhood park n review. G. Other Business and Reports 1. January 10th - Community Center Study Tour 2. Blackhawk Park - Property Acquisition 3. February Agenda - Commission Organization 4, Donation to Parks: Recreation - Creation of Trust Fund H. Round-Table I. Adjournment MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JANUARY 5, 1987 RE: THURSDAY, JANUARY 8 MEETING Members should be aware that the Commission meeting has been moved into the lunchroom, lower level of the Eagan Munici al Center, rather than the Council Chambers. This accomodates the Cable Commission who is also meeting that evening. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 1. BOULDER RIDGE Staff has prepared a memo concerning this and it is included with the Planning packet. This preliminary plat proposal was formerly known as "Pheasant Knoll", although significant modifications have been made which impact the park. 2. TOWN CENTRE 70 7TH ADDITION This proposal consists of a single lot for a Kentucky Fried Chicken facility. This plat should be subject to a cash dedication requirement. 3. EAGAN HILLS FARM P.U.D. The Advisory Planning Commission has continued the Eagan Hills Farm P.U.D. until its January Commission meeting seeking additional information from planning staff. Relative to parks, staff had a meeting with John Uban, Consultant Planner for the project, regarding park needs. This meeting resulted in a modification to the proposed central park area providing for greater width which could accomodate and better orientate play fields. However, further discussions with Mr. Uban are still required. Staff is recommending that upon the conclusion of this meeting, the Development Committee meet and discuss the project further, as was the Commission's direction in December. Staff will update the Commission on the proposed Eagan Hills Farm P.U.D., seeking further direction concerning specifics of the proposal. - OLD BUSINESS 1. PARK NAMING Dick Carroll, Chairman of the Park Naming Committee, JoAnne Alt, and the Director of Parks & Recreation, met in December to review some of the historical significance of the park properties up for naming. Mr. Carroll has done an extensive amount of research into the previous ownership of these parcels. From this, several possible name suggestions could be made in addition to other suggestions. Mr. Carroll will update the Commission on the progress made to date. 1 2. TRAILS PLAN Enclosed in the packet is a reduction of the trails plan for your review. Staff is recommending at this time that this trails plan be officially adopted and recommended to the City Council for acceptance. This plan can be added to your Systems Plan book. NEW BUSINESS 1. STATE OF THE PARKS A new year always presents the opportunity for a certain amount of reflection over the past year's accomplishments and the condition of the department. The Director would like to take this opportunity in the agenda to do just that; also to be identified for the Commission are some of the major issues of concern for the 1987 and beyond Park System. 2. CITY/SCHOOL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT School and City staff have been reviewing issues associated with the development of the City/school property known as the Mueller site adjacent to Wescott Road. Included in the packet is a memorandum prepared for the City Council and Advisory Commission as an update on this particular parcel. Staff will be happy to respond to questions regarding the possible development of this site and the implications to the City in terms of expenditures and time commitments. 3. PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS The Director of Parks & Recreation, several weeks ago (or has it been several months now) had a conversation with Commission members regarding assessments on park property. Since that time, I have asked the Finance Department to do an assessment search on all City park property. This search is nearly completed and staff is meeting to review this prior to the Thursday evening meeting., The Director of Parks & Recreation will report on that staff meeting and the impact upon the park system. 14 . PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS 479 & 485 Included in the packet are the feasibility reports for proposed Public Works projects #479 & #485 which provides for trunk storm sewer, utility and street improvements for Northview Park Road, affecting Northview Park. These feasibility reports have been received by the City Council and action has been taken to prepare final plans and specifications. Department staff will be working with the consulting engineering firm on those issues which affect City park property. This information is provided to the Advisory Commission because of the Commission's concern relative to these projects and certainly because of the impact upon the parks. PARKS DEVELOPMENT Staff is anticipating that Carnelian Park will be under the 1987 development contract. This particular park, at the time of the 1984 parks bond referendum, differed from the prepared concept plan inasmuch as the existing hockey rink is to remain on the site. Because of this change and a 2 significant amount of interest in the neighborhood, staff is recommending that a neighborhood meeting be held to discuss the parks design/development. Therefore, it would be important for the Advisory Commission to select a meeting date for the neighborhood so a letter of invitation can be sent to nearby residents informing them of the planning meeting. Staff is suggesting that this meeting be set for the week of February 1st or 8th. OTHER BUSINESS & REPORTS Commission members are reminded of the January 10th Community Center Study tour leaving City Hall at 9:00 A.M. The second item is relative to Blackhawk Park and the property acquisition of Mr. Ed Dunn. The third item concerns the Commission's reorganization which will be at the February meeting. Typically, the Commission selects its chairperson, vice-chair and secretary, as well as .establishing committee membership for the following year. Members may be aware that the City Parks & Recreation Department received a significant contribution from Eagan Town Centre. This contribution has been placed in a trust fund and is to be used for recreation programs and community recreation needs. Staff will provide additional information regarding this donation and the disbursements at the Commission meeting. Finally, enclosed in the packet is a letter from Mr. Tom Ketcham who has decided not to reapply for another three-year term on the Commission. Therefore, the City Council will be making a new appointment for this vacancy during the month of January. As always, if members are unable to attend the Commission meeting, please contact this office. Resr-ctf°ully submitted, Di: .of -Parks & Recreation KV/js 3 A r,_ of the Advisory Parks & Re+ ation Cc 1 rl was " 1 ed to of d by artin at 7:00 p.m. V M , >rs- r Cnv" 9., Carroll, C a ' ( wr tat of tc P'. Vraa, Planner/L Pi JuliE V visors: c onaric- Otk:- ° - f __Y _pec .f is _r_ r' i.ran mw _,1 to have added to t' C_r, " ion. to other addition } ar. ded. -86 OF 6 Moti by Carr )11, second+ ' by Kubil_, 11 s in favor, th of N( 6, r re approved. m b Pr, r r _ i CY n indica the devel >als woun tat of orde °e Mr. Sturm was l wing delayE ' ult of ~ o Parks 11_inner/Landscape Architect Steve nullivan presented th pr t. Addition as a preliminary plat for sevent en single-family he Service Sectia 15. . Sullivan ex)- d the 'pact o" elevation of ty and the n plat in ord to a por4-i.- elevation. ons b el -ovation nded to by P ;.,ullivan. CI a; imp+ ° c nt to t 3 ;rail t;:. )ugh in to i Tht. - for - the .7 c- ere park l___d c a ld sh liic U.® - ctor of nd Recr, tion r as t a le deli, uld pr( J he deve& om platting the ent'r enteen lots t e addition. -e lorr -family lc nay j( 3 d.-v-l( Therefore off that he a is y 1 requ"r or t 1 acco r e C ° ° j etives® In to ve Sull' the developer was aw, r of thi, le. Aft- is ri, a motion by Kubik, seconded b_ 11 m tb U im. -a. or, the Advisory Pgrtre & RP on 7 ie cash dedication, a scenic 1 he developer ° o `wench in a trailwa to th ~e r i- r'bance to the t_ .ion t -Itual lot 1 24 f " s 1__ Staff revi red the proposal by k °thwes ® m lines for it, face..." _°Ry. There were -cu , 3 questions ing the si. tla; -d fs-°°' After add Lu -.l disc°-- rE C idati - by t y Commissio:, c otion Kubil , hat 1 .e for t] dec c r 3. P1 a_- rim tu-'m was p sent for an explanation of the proposed Diffley CentE idition® Pl ® Sturm stated that the p) )osal includes t' ®vel >p ant of a Target stc and a Northwest R< c awim Club, the circulation ---n, the -oadway, a d `-3' e'°1-°°~ Jroposed devel(,-) As i e1 nteci. to n t' ,e dev oiler was proposing to i ovide i ly 8-1/ In addition, the develop wi' , C't,," policy a - _ Y n °.':1. , it W&- I'] f t o C:x 4 ie ? or not i' 1 o - _ + p 1 Thurston oted the of p' c c c . a Kubi'_ p--3de~ t' his it rc l _ top- . The Di. c_' 1 th issue for V e e Cit ie rezor of the carries a Comp. Guid e R-2, The Parts - ne itself strictly t of , not to th c a-_ >e of the property. It , an issue u~ L ay c.t 0i.u,d be reviewed by the C scion. Th 1 s Commission noted that the Planning Commission def err( this item until lts January meeting, t ° g additional information. ''he AdvL c ry Parks Recreation Cc issio, I to place - on it-, „i - Cc , ° -n --_ct zg for fi_a- review L. Pa r :)n Directo _-r he had placed the V E "n the C^v „ ?.nformal review. th t .1 s had p of 1 which had been th c relope then F >cond I ®oi ° of memb+ who sr sea meet-' Furtl. '-ers h d t yet t'ce deg __9 1 _t 1. It an : the A('v.- C -,)ul cirect~ CC e props _i~at Y cou_ - then t discussed wi' the c s and e PUD. I . d Ha 'y, spoke a f the develc , , la." 3d whc r e- at 3lc t c ttt tr- 1li _ kJ tF , r < _a ve AiJ 600.? 1 t11C } L V JG1- ex e' t > i ary C t lc 1 the ob- u` vas of t w PUD. th,t s' velopers were as concerned about y as the Advisory Co i d s d a 1' eal greE i belt ystem simile t' ' whict i p°lis r': S7 7y_ Chain of '_t_d ye ovil_ io_s amount h id,jacen to thi space, characterist: as wel- ark pr be a visu city a as prove- between n h-nds h- developm, would c 'd rith the exist' i Wescott. . UI )-I Lned the road system, c i°ig th' t 2 would contain a median car. u'ng th effect through the development. He stated tha_ there are s ..®f' .ient ball fields in he did not want to have a park _-stem that encouraged pec d le areas to play sc't' 11 wi' h: c careful design 1€ %n r,r the nat al, tr v by I` it a corridc and d, at th to t 'h is v v e) w ulc` t s4 y' 11le, tt--: sam time, p,o -f value to everyone. He concl xg 1 this ac c o" qt li'.y nei 9 C whit ° 11r 1 d that uld like to 'o t'- = plan t° the pub"' ad the` --.tion cyst- - a --te i;-: • 'he-- )t all c -ld be 100"' c 'ic -a t___ -)ugh _nt _oi 1_- f acce t mng land as dm cation® ° ication of the r t ;t au r ~~lt areas sl,r then r, Cap ' nether or i , C I then E I .~_l' be p, 7 plat which will sr -C a` i ar'e ev_ry house will ad that will ref: cc__® ;@ r will '.-ve to be anm.- ments as each pl= Mr. i >oni s ' i his point was that ft zot be just a be--' .1 the homes but a beautiful vtew froax 'k as well. The pogral vegetatio need to be -o---,° i.. Chairma -i 'n i _ la. s v: igs about the of of having the Comma ion r the propose 1 before it was actua' 1 ed. He stated h! f! t'iought was that it was a pretty good idea t:) l this green when he saw the map with the topo--- disappc-t appeared that all City Park Departme-'- ti the same t that was accepted back in the early 60's ° of ponds and i able space. Mr. Martin cant' ied saying t I between v massive, 4T ;1 the M~~ s plan Te L he rlosE 1 :t is suc t a rc Mr. , Mr. irtin expl al pr Lon without aphy, he did not undc mind of eloper as ii, r fated to parks. He sta-c' -lion 's for a level sr.-r=e to provide for the nei& -nd mr ac` ve play space. Mrm Martin explained that, for s onl, ball field shown, which would not meet the neigh ards for population derive l. After a dis ission aT standards, Mr. TTY, -4-ated that "n 1'- the provide for ap.r ,ely thirty of City's standard T edition, its 's the City's de ' i cn req-- ° -emen . y ar so s. '•a. that it c I ly aid no' there were tnirty <c 31 s~ Mr. Ubai t xplained -hry providing thirty 'f p operty of less than ` lopes and w:° hin the trail system. Mr. E said that this entire issu of parks was very critical t- the devel bec-.°-® h= felt that they had thirty acres which met the c of the C :Li 3 If they cou' develop twelve to fifteen acres per the 1 ' ation, by which ten )uld be level space and two acres would i, inactive s~ ne, th the City's require - '-e ~vj acres of ti Ie criteria of a F nt tats. will not sp- xau nd that "it is t° C is =vision as to ill be your needs but we think the t t we have present s you or - r 1-_ber of peoplE a If it Ot meet t' D City' e r is t us exactly , -o yo-- r I ®t, wY-. then went c to exr] that kL:) id that they Lll pro for the f 3 ,e' l l meet the of thr ` ;io v responsibili y for t- the spa ~y ..o -4e itself au be reap. ~ .le for its aet a~, c- u7 ation s° ;ed that he had seen a good ion an,' Ild I -tion to dig at in ter by nl and wane-1' "t'ff t.o dAir I )view at th ace, ^opriate to get t'iis, M. wL aai c land did not 1 i vc "or play spat There were a-',,.i nts by ^s regar 11 e t a>, -ay, proposed al'- a- -ie park, rf- l - .i,_ thn- I di:i _r l.c road circul- tion, and adjacent park G a de --lc it, The Commissi D then that no action won] t Staff shou- - with ie developer and thei --v lc tee to review '.:i _.a c,posal® ® _3 C1_,,__ Chairmai -tated that what hr a7 s in I' basical' y had hoped for, an ..1-Lted f- Code se i. He then asked ti a Co o rev' that tho -7 f.repared, hi k ' asues or Commission I° „ n d their I~ - - tion in Chapter 3, ted the par -atio- 11 _ t 'Ly fro- other 'y ch is also do--e ally. In Chapte >ion p' ioned t'ae regulation of Bras ed t t ^ees, th_ >rovide fo -.clusion for parka rop t y and Re.~_ _ i_-r, Members wire c~ or, y park plan bit prohibit the c 1`w 1 r: wined status. ;ion 10.22, regardi ",'w r„v, , the word -4 e" wa- -is and unclear. D sic a e -Dressed a for d e 'view of this sectio>, perhaps t'- r ity of rewry - or I Commission also di sed the need to ve the Parks cation 11 )y --d''ied rather tha- tained as a policy beta a exi; )de >t -fically mention p dedication regulatior Sta.:- dir.,,--- - ;o memorandum to t' City Attorney's office _ng tV ' issue. 4 Also disc i by the - _ ',ion were rule ---ns coneernT n" Arc control s, tree - ration and ion, enforc n dealing Dpment, I the need to re i ° alit bev M'a C that f >m his 3rspective, ore E f ' 1 may 'e "o - ictive relut, discu ' , Mr. in indicat+. 1' 'vi C' ild keep the e lose to them for a rs+ Di] c I Recreatf n Vraa exp,_ I t Tom Colbc , Public Wo E to leave "°ssion J °c. t° time ababysitting respc aibilitiese mild apej ~~k to the Commissioaa meeting lcztcz 7g® (Lat in the eating, it gat due the oL $ -)ur, - 3uld be - ' z a January o try t_ r 4 ~,r planning i, M `aeo ,_arroll stated ti~~'- he h-1 c' s-- --id h storical data regardir- the cc-_P - ' that he was pr i to call th C >sion decided to m t on Thursday, D c he Development Review Committee wo ' 0 t; , it' per, TO Director oi.' ar'rn and Recreation V'' ",buted trails plan, ' - .c-.ting the modific f® at _ - C__=- Memm, Ss brie] ly familiarized E_ with t_ angel S____ that this item ' ae January for c 1 aid zsi' into th( as p1.an. n I Julie L o ' , Intern in the depa.9t lent from the University d 'triL,~ - - t'.e demographic prof il'' ~ i. -omputC vi' ' 1 She stat-d t' at the draft docume t Simi] ' ' ' at it was her intE t) provic `°t di could then be 'ated into Mme, La ' b71 indicatoe' i°ha p nr Iff d, t 'on, inc l L- - - r a' .d its and bu: 1 .s .3 iscrepency in p( rig, vacaL, s, and the ti l ] ;ructior d occupancy. -sn ain the ; populatioi. sic 1982 -"aphis District t y 114%. on to S er y.,ars r., ; acre- 1 2 198E ti , g ,e C t'°) " ar-ol Ms. Len- 1 went c to explai differentials an, impact _ on parks serv' ~e districts and neighborhood 5 service areas. Several questions were asked b_; Commission )mber ding th, populatio projecticns, and 'h 'uropolit: ur a f+ Ms. Lenco not-d b -t several iixCs servic pop 1985 e d pro, d popul `ion for 19 -32. express = Tpprecie t ` are the work Julir in c pletion demo profile a °ted the draft PARKS S--Z- Director of Parks and Lion Vraa explained that tI- ar--ually upd r ' h = p tem's p' c i T, ,9 y, an,' L o ~Te l° 1 bed tI t3 I ventory 7 on, It es '-ly ba I :ed. ,er, t _ had 1 quality it stud 1 be i aorp Pc ads are ction. T- r.~il , nevi ~vu ' a: o be re i January, c d '>y the Adv- j we 7 h I a part of th -'iils sec -U The Dire ctor c. ,y C Lon f y ENT - ' Dr-r P i and Paula Su_ were t to review f o L C, i ;ion, , anned activities for the upci t Pau' . new program called, "North Pole Callir? 5e parents had r--nonded to a flyer, ose of the call Duld be to imitate 3 xplained their ctivities, inclu cation weekend. °othy Peterson told t' ring house attendants is nearly coir-- is a -n-idates to select from. She exnl- - 8_a iviti e alleyball, b '.etball, and winter i --id. , C sn activities d for th,- rinter wee] ad, cc lii sing both Pa - CL t'-E C' 3. P r - .or of r c.s and Fecree a raa, noting the he a br k, sugg that the Commission tc' their re.-ntly con<,rl A video prepared f or G- T-T. This the Staff was -'le to learn, from dev 1 i it, F impro ed and modified based on the ex rience game' fir p9 al -ng. L- .;ect/Parks Planner Steve Sullivan up '-.ed the C ae i ativities. Noting tr he early a o ir' P- . narks contracts, ',,a . . ' that the r he ve to con over into 1987. 'c is cont fencing and li contract with c 9estoration w year. 6 rs Director of Parks ration e that he has or a tour on Ja-rar°y 10 of city cent- e cities of `Jen Pr_L St. Louis Park. and Brookl N ;er. HE it up to the I.viso i ission to co ° he stE -i The C, on members d to at 9:00 Fill on Janu y 10 for the toy; Dhn VonDeLinde rE Wi prm It t a ma ° ce o us iys than dur USINESS D !ill 1 a Dec City Council Ig o !nsive Plan, me d. r°°r4-° r°rasin, and Katchamw__., _t_ Y___.___ terms d 3 up for r€-r ® ° _®tment, it y ...o ud, -m_-then thr -y ,i beginning in 1917. T" sing no other additional business, visory Co issi+ rnE 11_a a P.M. 7 CITY OF rACAN RID E } SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BOULDER APPLICANT: NEW AMERICAN HOMES `T T ~ > LOCATION: 1 i_~Ci`T A, I ?',f'3G~1AS I,ZXE HEIGHTS EXISTING v~€.z if UNDER f ~~~~'44 ~~v. ~ UNDER THE ~~~r~,Z~~ f'~sY~ PARK Pis DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 18, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBE-? 15, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION: An appileatandon has been submit Led to the City request- ing a Preliminary Plat for. the Boulder. Ridge Addition. this plat contains 75 townhouse units on 18,7 gross acres abutting County Road. 30 on the north, Thomas Lake Roth, and approximately 2.2 undeveloped acres of the Deerfield apartment project on the we s', and Heine Pond on the east, The Pheasant Knoll Addi-Lion previously received Preliminary Plat approval on this site in 1984, but was never final platted This townhouse proposal is consistent with the zoning district in the BBlackl1a.wk Park Planned Development, EXISTING LAND USE Surrounding Land us6s are single family to th south and east of Heine Pond and R-3 to the SW, The undeveloped 2.2 acres of the Deerfield project, east of ;fholtta Lace Road, is also designated for an R-3 density, The overall density for this pr-o_je.ct, after the 9,9A acre park dedication, 8 units per acre (on 9 , 3 n t- acr ) , F ach unit has approximately 900 S, of building coverage with a total site coverage of 17% on the 9,. 20 is allowed in P_ acres. d i trict_s, This, site is most .y open grassland and undeveloped at this time, The & r1 t :tde falling to Heine Pond is approximately 55 ft, and covered wi-t_t, a stand of mature pines, Another lineal stand of deciduous hardwoods are near the pond surface, SITE PLAN: These owner occupied units will be serviced by a single access . or 60 units from Thomas Lake Rd and a public/private drive from County Road 30 for 15 units and the proposed neighborhood park facility, The park is programmed for a small boat launch, an open i3 shelter and passive recreation o f c , St aft has recom- mended a trail connection from this park area to the existing trail along Mma s Lake Rd in addition to the trail on the south. side of Dif:(ley Rd. The private drives are narrower than the City and will e Homeowner's Association standards wilbe maintained ~ the asw d...1 the lawn maintenance and trash - pickup. Related to the size of the street is the need for quest parking„ Each unit BOULDER RIDGE DECEMBER 18, 1986 L ti PAGE T W TWO will have a setback of 25' from the private street and 20$ on the cul-de-sacs, Therefore, 2 additi_oncl park lop spaces are be:LnCg, provided meeting the Code requirement ot additional outside space per unit. The concern though is that Here may not be the a -ebihI-11_ y in the roadway system to accommodate additional park I%'aE on the street if so z e de;a, Separate quest_ parking would be advisable scattered throughout the site. Code regtoiPr'E'os a dint once of 30 between the h r i n g groupings and this has been provided. Each building pad will be platted as a lot with the remaining open space becoming out lets For the project to be built as proposed, massive grading will occur to L he degree of filling in a portion of Heine Pond. r This pond is not covered under the ihil C•lc1L1d Zoning Ordinance butis a i_},N R, Protected Weti-c~Y:~C_~, Evidence Fs 1 of the severe grading the need of the retaining wall between the upper and lower portions of the project. This wall will roach an ultimate heiqht of roughly 16' and will need to he 1_Ofl 7r than s1ho n on he preliminary grading plan to provide a more gradual tapering into the hillside. The proposed story walkout style units are not the most off i"C°_LE'ni- building for the site i hoot requiring the 1 urge amount of grading. -r t the, density was increased on the top of he hill or the 2 , 2 acres to the west were incorporated with this plat, these unit could be placed much more sensitively on tVe site,, thus saving the most dominant fea ote.s of the site the wooded hAllside and the pond frontage. Also the reduction of grading proposed for that hillside will help prevent undue erosion and Potential damage to the at:e quality of tie ? ie Peed Heine Pond' is known as the clearest' water body in p'ag and vLsabl , up to a rleoth of nearly r i ' The buildings willbe constructed o horizontal tap g ,b1_cC roof details and tuck under garages. Fireplaces will tiC:" optional_ a NO active recreational amenities such as a pool-, tennis courts, or "tat lot are proposed. A preliminary landscape plan has been included with this submission or none aL 3.?1:~ _ showing tdiE' new planting areas. Little i>_ of the eXLD, trees will be saved with the current grading plan. The ornamental f .L. sizes will need :eneed to be increased, to to meet _ t the standard of t11t' Citya s Landscape Policy. All other t=l:ec, Si c "'sa quantities, and es are acceptable in a preliminary way. There will need to be a detailed retaining wall planting plan witli the Final Plat submission if that grad 3 np plan is approved as is- BOULDER RIDGE PACE THREE GRADING/DRAINAGE: This development is proposed to be located on the western slopes of Herne Pond which has an approximate elevation differential of 65' from the high point near Thomas Lake Road to the low point near Heine Pond, The proposed development plan results in major excavation and fills of almost the entire site ranging in cuts of approximately 20' near the high knob adjacent to Thomas Lake Road to fills of 8' along portions of the cul-de-sac adjacent to Heine Pond. The el.evat.i.on differential between the proposed townhouses on the loop street and the lower cul-de-sac is 18' with a building separation of only 401. This results in the requirement for a substantial retaining wall, approximately 230' in length and W-18 hi . g h Townhous e units acd{jacent to the western property line should be converted to tuck-under units rather than the proposed walkouts due to their proximity to the existing side hill, This will minimize the amount of excavation and disturbance of the wooded area to the west, Due to the existing water quality and past protection provided to Herne Pond in the past' the majority of surface water runoff generated from this development should be intercepted by storm sewer facilities and discharged directly into the trunk storm sewer line adjacent to Heine Pond, This will require additional storm sewer facilities and minor berm construction to pick up backyard drainage in addition to the internal private street runoff o in addition, a storm sewer line should be stubbed to the west to provide for the capacity of 3.0 cfs. The final, detailed grading plan should provide for emergency overland drainage swa_t.ess from the low points in the internal private drive to prevent flooding to those units. Additional storm sewer drainage facilities shall be instal-led to maintain the current rural ditch drainage section that will be blocked by the proposed connection of the private cul-de-sac to Di f:f leys Road (County Road 30), UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth to handle this proposed development, is provided by the existing trunk facility transgressing this property along the western edge of Heine Pond. This development proposes to provide several individual sanitary sewer s e r v i c e connections i n t o t h i s t r u n k facility. Because of the depth of this line, it is recommended that the proposed internal lateral sanitary sewer system be extended to minimize the number of direct overdepth service connections to this trunk sanitary sewer. in addition, this development shall extend a sanitary sewer line to i t s west property l i n e at an appropriate elevation to provide service through a subsequent extension for the adjacent undeveloped property, Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is provided by both the 12" trunk water main in Thomas Lake Road and the 12" trunk water main in Diff ley Road. A minor modification to the internal looping alignment will be necessary to minimize the length of i.ndivrdual private services. This development shall also provide a stub connection to the west property line for future extension and service to the adjacent undeveloped property. BOULDER RIDGE DECEMBER 18, 1D86 PAGE FOUR STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: y. '~;.s deve1.opment is 1r'o 3osed to be serviced entirely by a private street system. Due to the number of units proposed to be served, the street shall be a minimum 28' in width with minimum building setbacks of 25' from the back of curbs `S.'l.i development is proposed to be serviced by Thomas Lake Road, which i currently constructed to its ultimate design section, and also Diffley Road (County Road 30), which is proposed to be upgraded to its ultimate design section within the next two years. The private cul-de-sac on the lower level shall be increased to provide a minimum radius of 401 Access of the private lower level cul-de-sac to Dia uIey Road (County Road 30) shall be approved by Dakota County. E SE ENTS/RIGHT -OF-t AY/PER IT5: This development shall dedicate all easements necessary for the internal sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer system of sufficient dimension as required by alignment and depth. This development sxhaLl provide additional utility easements for the existing trunk sanitary and storm sewer system to ensure that no is located closer than 20 from the centerline of those facilities. Because this plat is adjacent to County Road 30, it shall be subject to all right-of-way and easement dedications necessary for the upgrading of County Road 30, Due to the fact- that Heine Pond does riot have any storm water discharging into it but does have a gravity outlet, a high water elevation will be required to be dedicated incorporating the 878.0 contour. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, Dept. of Health, Dakota County, etc,) are acquired prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, whichever is required by the affected agency. SThis parcel was previously assessed trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer h£-.'.i2et:its in addition to lateral benefit from the trunk sanitary sewer, the trunk water and the residential equivalent for Thomas Lake Road. However, several of these assessments were based on the agJ s.calttura!/as.ing e- fam:Liy zoning rate, Therefore, as a condition of this plat, it is required that this development assume its responsibility for increasing the use of this property and the resulting impact on the trunk utilities based on the difference in the rates from the agricultural to multiple density zoned useages identified as follows: BOULDER RIDGE DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE, FIVE ITETNI 1987 RATE QUANTITY MOUNT PROJECT Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main (Thomas Lk, Ed,) $ M/f A: $546/f®f, $4,412 237 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main (Dif_fiey Rdj `20,55/f,f, $.582/ ,f. $11,960 137 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer $l0 80/ , m* $600!`f . f:. $ 6,180 237 Thomas Lake Road $3l 09/fA. $546/f,f& $16,975 237 Diffley Road (Future Street) $66~53/f,f. $582/f,f, $38,720 D :i ff le Road Trail (Future) $12P40/f@f. $582/f,f, $7,217 TOTAL $85,464 This rate is the difference between multiple residential rate and the previously assessed agricultural/single-family rate. The rates quoted are 1987 and the quantities calculated are based on preliminary plat information, The final rates shall. be those in effect at the time of final plat approval or related project approval by Council action, whichever occurs first, All quantities s h a l l be based on f i n a l f i g u r e s c o n t a i n e d in the f i n a l p l a t documents. CONDITION,(-; 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A copy of the Home Owners Association Bylaws shall be reviewed. by the City as attorney. . The parkland dedication shall be fulfilled in accordance with the Planned Development a'greemenL, 4 n A trail connection shall be provided from the park facility to the trail on Thomas Lake Road as well. as the trail along Co. Rd. 30. 5, A revised grading plan be submitted fLai lessens t=ic in-,pact on Heine Pond 6 ~ A detailed landscape plan he sub i1 L' ted, A financial guarantee shall not b released until after i_ year from the installation date. 7. The retaining w0l1 shall be reviewed by Staff to ensure structural soundness and addit Loral. plant z.ncrs or fences, may be added for safety reason,,_-,, BOULDER RIDGE DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE SIX CONDITIONS: BOULDER RIDGE 8, All private streets and public utilities necessary to service this de elopme>nt shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Engineering Division and in accordance with City standards, policies and codes. 9. All surface water drainage from this development shall be intercepted and discharged directly into the existing trunk storm sewer facility. 10. A final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall, be approved by the Engineering Division prior to final plat approval 11, A storm sewer lateral shall be stubbed to the west property line to prE vS.de for future extension and service to the undeveloped property to the west. t 2 w All proposed retaining walls shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and Codes. '3a All. .nternal streets shall, have a minimum width of 28 and a minimum cul-de-sac radius of 40' 14, No structural building shall be located closer than 20 to the centerline of the existing trunk sanitary sewer or storm sewer facilities. 1€5a This developraer?t shall dedicate all necessary tatility easements, peal is rights-of-way and ponding easements as required by the City or the County. 16e This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all required regulatory agency permits in accordance with their stipulated time frames m l/ This development shall be responsible for the upgrading of trunk related assessments associated with the rezoning and any additional trunk areas, lateral benefit or front footage assessments previously not levied and/or associated with the future upgrading of County Road 30. V This development shall extend sanitary sewer and water laterals to the west property line for future extension and service to the undeveloped property to the west, 19. This development shall be subject to all conditions and rests i.ct :_on :F of Dakota County regarding its proposed street access aid platting adjacent to Count' right--of:--°way. ~`ARN£L9 P^A7C.N -\g _ /"'-'PARM F'P NK ~ -8b aa. c 55122 .`J . T BI - sw gyn. a rv s~ wn a v`~ q I LOCATION MIN* w g 4 ~ L 1 1 N ZONING A- 2 R-4 i POwck, Yet . R-11 R-11 L RB R-111 R-111 ~~~t' ~f ?R1 t-KJ • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN E R-11 a ~ ~ I s 5 Q z ai ~ ~ g s ~ Ij Ljj 0 1 r p o o A ~ J ~ L r 17 ma. 1 313RLQ 1Yn x L-Li P~ ~ l il . rv rv ~ x a u ~ ~ r a a~ ~~y ~ d w~ u u~ ~ Q '^Y q V d d, i ; °r p. W! is o Q I! I 3Sn x ice' ~ o 0 0$?§ 4 w U S 6 P u 141 i T g- .a fi i~' r - ~ CtiLz~ W fj 1O! u^U ion ~ d xi - \ ~ I IZI I~ s £ z l I - . „tea ®r j\ r f jf f 40 ROAD NO 350 w .r ---w- - .I ' I' NveTG a> 120 27 22 73 21 2S 20 1111 ~ 26 j 1-6 > 31 32 57 V, I5 _ 1,5 'A 9~F IA _ - 'S5 f; 1 3 r Z s° 5~ P° P~~p -57 1, j r 9 -59 9 \ 8 9! I a L6f~END .G 42 -s->-, sxa}Tftie }ANRA¢Y }cwce ~ t. L 1` _ ~ -a'- w- 6Rt¢TfIJG WAIGRMAIK K y_a~bo 9 r+u ) -a~ >-s-r Exi}TfN[> TORM 56WG4 'gam YO ~ W --'-O E%IST INSa tfYP&ANT S q ~ :t. ~(P'~~it/- PROPOSGO W0.1E ¢*A4iK k ` 3 f ' -8=~®ci® v¢oaasc4 }ANfTA¢v sEwce PROPO}64 LMF4AAlT 1111 45 j.' - PeoPOS.4 M.uwu .e >Bfy •-.N P¢U.p4564 CWTG AtVG \ L. NOTSI Q-C QNTS W- B6 PgW-V A4 7 k R6Qf.u¢EF F- -1111Q1, A- RAt-Q 49 1 vF PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN E AERkCAN Ka NxT 3? [--ConS nu Ares inc. ULDE E 4 A ~Z S 86 -6-, MINNE~.,OTA 14 C,a `o ~ n w d rt+ m x m` s m~~ a ~ l 6t o rnr'raty A ~'~i Q t S i W 4 w; 3 s r a3,. ox~S~~yrS'~y ~~z ry s~ a 9 3 ~ 4 ~ y; I 2. i 6 s ~s ~ ~ I z, ~ P P tV P a r- P r \ sip` F • N t T /Jf~ \ 40/ ~ a - is cam' ~OP8~i I _ _ ~ yy 890? P0 h 7 0 57306- „ Y- ~L9Y'9?60 n? ,'r 4 F F i P.~' 871 0 a PE 40 799 2$7 , s. (a 8800 R 8 4 AP 00 CENTE 17 2 802~4~ CP-tt 8 a T t r " ' o JP 3`~8 r6r^C \1' H 1 l1 PpRPf7 0 R~ 844.0 PII i e• gc5 JP FNOF 808.0 JP-2 893.0 IL/,x 844.0 pt ( e ,ry~,~S~ r 8955 S n+r10N5 851.5~f J i5; 43F1. _8 4174 _P12JP¢T ti Ate \ wa~' Jan i P-l t S , P-I 8356.70 Vii, ~/}~~~V\Q(y' 800 BLACKHAWK 27 -4k HIALI 1C PARK B N 3 SIP t O' 792 2.3 f L' 4 920.6 80110 ~f 830.0 P-29 sVa E s_ J t 1L~ ._in 809.7 sou; A l Il t ' I ~i 8/8.0 W, -b 1 BP- i e 6es9a8 ?scofp2( 3Oq is e48 C. _ i-may 9a~ -s~~ 9$&,0 48 8-b 8300 P-9 A A" F tl P 38 ~i( r. u, 8 3 P t'!'6Pz9 4A~. 4FaTeM 83O.a 3s V~ 11U ~~lL r 6-3 36 870.68 72.4 8b?z 12 1 889.9 ;t7~_ J d° ~S `A. Jp- [ L_t 905.2 J P } CAtTVE _ANOALF P'35 8-c ti 7JP 4 ~L _ P nA~ r IA, 908.0 1RK A~ 920.2 874.0 3c7. EA t: _ \ pO C 11P-4 -874.5 PAaK u y 52 92O5 888. BPS /J (l 8~; C. 5 a. 92TZ 0. 862 I r 5 a ""`w? ~~f P 5IV X99 Si _ 923.Ty Nv6 5 j h f _ lP 43 6 ! e j . t t AP"2b i r ( 951.E K k9MO OP-1 7 e 4 853.8 v aee i 1 1 aP-23 zo Lt- 2 93i 3 THOh~ ;a, 3' Jp fig ti '91 1 x-892:©ti a J - d 3/ NEIG a~ '90~0~ BP_ 662.0 -43 7 90 q, S ~i. RF' ;a 901.1 j . ` - Rr" urlL16 8P 9b ~F' I' L ?5 ~F a F` Gf BP£~ ~slls. P~l.j.,1 " { 54'~ ..N..~ l ! J.`~5-1»{-.,fit , t f c x ! S J CS Y' -d3 APB I, nt A°, ul BPf~ a P 912.E Aso 9182 GP 1 t~ P 4 O~ } ~f' -55 L r 7" AT 0 5 z~0 EAGA BP- 7 . ggp. a r i,- k:_ } 31A- 'T ~ a 11 Get 935.0 I"n\i l1 ..r .c ir~.^.1 ,`9 / *a.O 7 " ru 11 I B R A a xes ? I I : f rn-`~ ; SUBJECT PARCEL Buu'LPER RIDGE I 1 _Ay of eagan approved plate arcs PUBLIC WORKS iyi LILL LIL 71T, LL ILI- P,ii C y~,~ 11 iii a t J ULIL !I A If a pp~ I. LIL LI___ LJ +LL I LLL!LIL LULL L CITY OF EAGANN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT QT2WE CLHILL TL A L)DI _C I0 N; APPLICANT: DE LARIA DEVELOPMENT COP' PORATI ON LOCATION: OUTLOT A, TOWN CENTRE 5TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 18, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 8, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERIN APPLICATION: A:: application has been i s t od by the Do -."i a e; ` ?illf'I?f Corporation requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Town Centre (ii 7th 1.dP _i crlk This consists of a single ~c; p_l ~ ~~_t ~ '_onsi:6 acre lot for a Kentucky F'1 1 ._d Chicken r ac:ll ty, A s irate Conditional Use Permit application has also been submitted for the drive-`.hru SITE PLAN: This fast food facility will contain 54 seats and i t o e C_c e _ t 7 d from a single rl_)m a access from Town Centre 28' _Drive. i'ac Bell _ is to the west U_n(_3. the pp i ved ,previously a Arby's to to east. The user will eITLer the site in a one way, vehicular movement, then either park in the 60 degree a.nq UIan stalls or ? ~ e VI E' proceed t}through to the ^r1J:~~_t;~1]~;.:. There 7,_, a 19 degree wide ) _ ne provided for this h1- 1 ve-thru and exit lane on the west side of the b>.i.i.-ainC3 with stacking for 5 cars. One parking stall has - been shown for use caLter going through the pickup area. Staff recommends removing this and turning pl"C?~'~LCIi[1-~ an easier LL1_a. radius to "re-enter" the parking a r e a . `ti` \,^?l?T1C. y three (23) 31 0. c igr.e_e stalls would `titl be provided Code only requires b,,,,s.cd on the , ;..e:_ 3 seat criteria Al 1, bui.l.dinq and parking setbacks meet Code requirements. A 26" _a pylon sign containing 114 4 of area has also been proposed in the location approved 1,., the Town CenLre n , 70 Sign Agreement. The optional reader board will - be 32 >,:(:./146 sa .n t.oTalm This would be above the 125 set< permitted b;i-i: consistent with other fast food establishments Federal - Land Company will that the sign have c3 ,~5r height matching ? that of the adjacent signs. A preliminary landscape plan was submitted and the detailed plant- ing will . d to be c plan plan ;ni'i1 be ~''~E'~~,aCc~ ra J?c, `?n ! vi er1L in terms - ~ of sizes, ec5 ic'- and Li.~' overall design concept in that c_t area TOWN CENTRE 70 70TH ADD DECEMBER 18, 1986A PACE TWO GRADING DRAINAGE: The major grading for this site was previously performed under the original Town Centre 70 Ist Addition development. In addition, storm sewer facilities of sufficient size and capacity to handle this proposed development have been previously installed within Town Centre 70 Drive and the Interstate right-of-way. However, the proposed discharge of the catch basin outlet from the north end of this parking lot will require a bInDOT permit for discharge of surface water runoff into their right-of- way. Raced on past review of similar developments adjacent to this proposal, it is not anticipated that there will be any objections. In addition, minor modifications to the existing catch basin inlet in the north gutter line of Town Centre Drive at the entrance to this development will be required as the responsibility of this development UU`$.iLITIE : Sanitary sewer and water services of sufficient size and capacity to handle this development were previously installed to this property under the original development of the own Centre 70 1..st Addition, No additional utility construction will be required. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Major access to this development will he provided by way of Town. Centre Drive, which has been constructed to its ultimate design section. The access location ZT ~tM_ ~;tCC~~~t~C+., access ..,of this driveway is not compatible with the e existing ~ Y 3 astii7g driveway connections previously approved for the Arby's Restaurant under Town Centre 70 4th Addition.. The centerline of the proposed driveway will have to be located a minimum of 60 west of the east property l i n e to maintain adequate separation between commercial driveways. The internal parking lot configuration, including driveway access, width and radii will have to be modified to conform to City standard dimensions. iSEM1ESNTS/ RIGHTS-OF-WAY/ PERMITS: All necessary permanent right-of- way has been dedicated under the Town Centre 70 1st Addition However, a permit will be required from MnDOT for the discharge of surface water runoff into their right-of-way as previously discussed m ASSESSMENTS: Al.! assessment obligations associated with this development have been previously levied under Project 429. There are no adCdi tiona assessment obligations associated with this development. TOWN CENTRE 70 7TH ADD DECEMBER, 18, 1986 PAGE THREE CONi_.3TT_EONS.. TOWN CENTRE 70 7TH ADDITION 1. A.l.1. ;mot ail.Jln 3_u platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2,. A Parks Dedication Fee will be required. 3.„ A detailed landscape plan will be prepared prior to the Final at submission and a financial guarantee provided and not released until one full year from the time of instal- lation, 4. The pylon sign shall be a 25' height maximum. The one time sign fee will- be required on the amount of signage approved by the City Council ((114 s.f. or 146 s.f. ) 5 s The single parking stall on the exit lane shall be removed . "softer" turning radius back to the parking area s h a l l . and a be required. 6 A Mn,.)OT permit for storm water discharge into I- 5E right-of- way must be obtained prior to final plat approval. 7. The centerline of the singular driveway access into this development shall be a minimum of 60® west of the east property line 8. All internal parking lot configurations and circulation shall be in accordance with City engineering standards regarding dimensions and layout, JOWN CENTRE 70 -.FIFTH ADDITION o T r • Nrtaa trw at wt.. wto° 1t~~]LLL...,,,,,,,, i + y .st • Mw 1 ~c Moo"oo trw as /..w. 6 1. t SAM; ' latw .Lo rtsa4os AT TNtao ..:aortae out .W.lo L.n he CO." • t. #a•srs• pattwrwlp+ M to .11 tN tollwlN dusrtaN rvtagrrtY aicw aM to W CO.". AS 1 g { #tata #t t att to :tat ' a t: 7yq tp r «w OUTUIT A. Ttrod CEYrRa ri M"m aWtTION, atawAta» A• iM +awte plot ShAr.". • ,1 i b L'•t t tt -4 WAS a•-•• too a w sarror•d W !iota" •o T" c 7• TIM ifla ry dMt > s bb' ct Lr SJ* ~~y e.raw~ Nutt" . aawa w aN plat for arotWs sad eel l try p"Pes" rip. ° • wig ~.rw L t• .1Z Moxwt utd rMat.t 44" C_.Y, • ?lmawa pwr.l NrAwrMip. is N ALi W Yuaw A, C.1- wd vrtt• f. CN.M. ro' ar W. Me id li 1'' °i'a'B.yd•® 6. r VICINITY egos" LAM Cw-w sw.li, M.E7. Igs.2E by 1t ar•{ew#• AN. wlit:r E.aaote stow twos 'Tr'Y. s N+faTe + a " ! ® { t+ ®P;8. v. m 1 STATE BX s8 at To. farNaAN Iwtrrwt Wa aalwwlSdNN' Mfor. w MIA Mr j (t ° i; « ! at Me w Cal • WrwTaa'7 %.Sol* d icta "-I-. s•r^,.as sr th i aurwe • Mr~Nr.°w Tat ro! w, W/ . A sl s al !sa f, a• *`*A 18Y •I -.4 u Tar" s a Ttta 6.1 7 tot tN MIN two 1. .14" •N N1•ea+N lot tAwS, WtarT PAt1A Yrf + ~e t AwATOw wa aM ML.p lt.! loot to at•M •u ulstotry atrwa ul"w°Ya!-yrsa NfLa" Is tale plat. 11-0 wlwa awnta. 4Yta.t4 AN ft. plat. cl, I Nr•bl astttrY Mot I Mw wrwp}N aw Atoll" tM sewrty dswrltrN w tale plat w low i,; Is VIM aWtT1a, Mot toga :1; is .1-9 e.rrusac•tlw of the EST tact ell St. ars } ; f 0. r forrutir "w - tN ?la! iug .L- aaW,Ntas of . EMa. ANSI all R• M New wt MSilt R1: 1,Ai:: 1 Ct1NY'C F7 fr µaeN t eN yr•..A tat... t•.t tM Naala awNarr 11aw .r. prrwtl A•atf•a W ®la# to 'j " ®t '(ANTE E 0000t_E HL AD aN Mat wra ate w Nt J.." w BsAtt• ?Iahvw to w Ma{watN •twr 4Tas AN - t r .w. . :ter:: tit j[j t AN • & • . • rt, f' °t ` Nlowwt. Ass4 rstiw M. Sets It,'ia coon a at A{ ®a 7%. t•ray/N torwrtr*a Csttif{•ot• ru t Mfota w iaM "t' °k cous" 414 R l W P 1. A T or 1 w. by a»,A E. w. U !Ew; • et ty L4 raw r. J . y W w w wrwY amity aa•t INS av at a t t. III 1 e C1Ay {,t TOWN tNU. sE WSU• aple•rN tame plaf. v_"°..•.°^" , CITY COUNCIL OR• WILM. of e s i, a f® tT~ T{{ N C E N T R E by "of" .f. 1 CENTRE `t . r • OU T LOT par to Cxo r 312. iLw ae wao Ilia. 41414 plat us NASA •tN tale NET 1 raw. r. , +4 0 U T1 L° 0 1' 74 At A E At I MtwY wrt ilf wt tM taw Ear tM it fat tM Y tNt# plea « et" CENTRE 7# V"to &b"ITI" Now A*_ uN wltta yr K riRU 1 LOT i A tw Naa„r, r, , T1 . t M Mliwla Raws .w .M ttaaatar wa.tM tai* SAY of tam N J° 74 FOU T1i AD 010N ADDITION 1(1(1( I. I / l.OCK i VI toes 1! or ss r A—- o.d. tMt s•/o twrrsout uu !!0N I. too sYetlaww N 4. w m CA•Wsatf Asir s • i t } -Ei" as t + ! w°^° ~ Hf •t . ® ' at , e . ,ems" 0 i.w^^ g: r° ° t a toY w NM t t 1 r awry .r . r ter. i.,. w~. ° • i r ai ft * ~ t ~ . 4. ~ • a t °1' t2 E. ,r . tl ~ fP} j •a~ # 1 g} 6 t .,i it t I? ~f> aG k' RHAYC DSURYlYi f ? :s F. C 0 N D D t I CA ~ ~ 1 1"- Ik. m e r i t * OfIt% YANKEE ®®®®L. ROAD 4 r ~ 5 r ueW-t cnr~ltcs lil k~ {+f"-«?'e! rsau .-.,.1 ®`C ® x~bn•i -tT rl I Ift.. p g m Pict! 9ye euwrw$ p / C > ' 471 r i L'7~44~4 d .t ~--'ks,+i 6<S y~f~.i a ~ ~r;N e~+`."°.r •~r'O.Y;-~~~ - a{cum t~,~ot:.y_ TON CE f'" <r t - U P LARW,-JG ;dKti gg rd~rx li 4 ANTCO CONSTRUTION KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN rA«,PA ,e..f NY4_f U f N 41713 LOVELL ROAD EAGAN, MISS. LEXINGTON, MN. (8123 780.1942 5 00 C cl 14`_0'/4® z/ IOY4' O.D. PIPE ,10 READERBOARD COLUMNS (OPTIONAL) ELECT. `o ACCESS 9'-41/4' HOLE Wt REMOV. PLATE COVER GRADE 6'"4'/4' S4 I' ELECT. CONDUIT,- I = ' FURN. & INST. I I e n ' ' BY G.C. I rte- ° - :a; Z-- CONCRETE PIER STEEL REINF. - SEE / SIGN FTG. DETAIL I /S4 ~l u5 BARS TOP & BOT. *5 BARS AT 1'-3' O.C. BOTTOM ONLY CONCRETE PAD CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT EAGAN HILLS FARMS APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORAT10N LOCATION: E SECTION 24, / SECTION 23 & PARTS OF NE 4, SE 4 SECTION 24 EXIST%ING ZONING: A (AGRICUL'I"UR L) DA '117E PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 18, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 1.5, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPTS ICATION An application has been submitted requesting a R r of acres from A (agricultural' to a mixed use Planned ezoing Development District, There are 7 parcels with separate ownership included in this proposal e Four owners; developers will coordinate the planning, construction and PD process. They are Charles Hall, United Mortgage Company, Enebak Construction and the Sienna Corporation, which will act as the head of the management teams The Eagan Hills Farms proposal consists of 316 acres for varied housing types and densities, 32 acres of high density residential, 6 acres designated for neighborhood commercial and the remaining open space for a parks dedication, The Land Use Guide Plan de sign-- ates this area as R-II (3 - 6 units per acre) and an Amen mernt will be necessary because of the proposed commercial zoning within the Planned Development A submitted phasing plan is shown through 1999 The 115 year PD Agreement being requested, may be the most beneficial to the City and developer to ensure a steady, well managed. project. Eagan Hills Farms is located north of Diffley Road, south of Wescott Road, abutting portions of Dodd Road on the east and the Hall Family Trust land and the proposed Stafford Place sub- division on the west, LAND USE- . Currently, these parcels are being agriculturally used or are large si-ngl' _ family homesteads, . The surrounding land uses are similar in nature except for West Publishing, north of Wescott Rd alonthe eastern' portion of the site,. The Windtree and South Hills Additions are also to the north, If the June Hall Trust, 91 -acres to the west€ becomes a part of this PD, a designated elementary school site and the Greensboro Addition .will- be directly impacted, .The - 6 acres proposed for N.B. will be at the ifersections of Wescott Dodd Roads, just south of West Publishing, Adjacent parcels, not a part of this PD, will need - to be included in - a conceptual wa % to provide comprehensive- circulation and utility systems, EAGAN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER IS, 1986 PAGE TWO The site is characterized by numerous knolls and depressions with an Upland native plant material association, most notably the hillsides of `yaks, These scattered areas are often found near the existing ponds. Some of these hi. isides would appear anbui3d able, if developed, they would require massive grading and the result would be t-.he loss of all the hardwood species m Many of these areas have been included in the parks dedication and will provide a nice visual transition between different housing styles/ densities as well as a physical connection between the areas. Most of the existing pending areas will be connected by storm Sewer with a design goal of minimizing the 'bounce" of the ponds. By doing so, trees that were subject to flooding will now be on dry Land., These fringe areas around the ponds may also be utilized for hard or soft trail purposes. PROJECT SCOPE: Eagan Hills Farms is a 7 phased project . containing Rt~-_r; ajor blocks of land, The phasing will occur generally in a east to west manner with the high density multiple housing being the last phase to develop, A high-rise building has been proposed with 10 30 units per acre in this area. At the Pre- public hearing neighborhood meeting, there was concern expressed by the residents of the South Hills Addition of the appropriatenes of" a. high rise in that area and its impact on the existing single family homes in the area, The overa.l.l. concept is to provide a mixture of housing between 1 6 units per acre with an average of 4 units per gross' acre This would allow a maximum total. of 1,616 units on the 404 acres, At this time, the developers anticipate approximately 1,000 total units and the current Comprehensive Plan would allow 1,121 - 2,424 units. While the totals fit within the density requirements, staff is suggesting that. a more defined breakdown of densities per block be provided, This would help in long range planning in that the multiple districts would not have almost limitless unit potential, Also, many guidelines and specific de, si€gn criteria have been proposed in this development but minimum design standards for each housing type (lot size, lot area, frontage and setbacks) need to be adopted by the City so that each individual plat submission an be reviewed according to the overall PD require- ments, At this time, there are no specific deviations from the standard platting requirements other than aesthetic features, Increased, and in many cases, decreased setbacks have been mentioned but need to be formally addressed in each housing district. of the proposed single family areas, 2r0%R is slated for large executive homes, 40% for standard housing and 40% for smaller lot subdivisions, The PD process is in the best interest of both the City and develop- er as the major goal is to construct the two ?gain collector streets (the extention east of Northview Rd and the southerly extention EAGAN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE THREE of Elrene Rd connecting to Dodd Rd) and utilities in the first phase, A one time land Parks Dedication will provide the My's Park Commission/staff the flexibility of securing parcels of land based on criteria within the Parks System Plan, The submitted park layout will need to be reviewed in greater detail by the staff and Parks Commission, In concept though, the layout works well, it is a matter of the City acquiring enough open space for usable active areas, By controlling the water level in the ponds, the park system will have much more land available for passive use. it will be a benefit to the system to control, waters edge areas as opposed to leaving them for individual . lot usage. The applicants have proposed narrower streets based on Average Daily Trips (ARTS) figures and cul-de-sacs with planting areas, The street tidths/R,O,W, issue should be resolved prior to the finalizing of the PD Agreement so there can he a consistency within th entire development, The islands in the cul-de-sacs and all planting areas shall be the responsibility p of the Home- owner's Association proposed by the developer, The City shall review and approve all plant material sp:pcres to be used in the project and detailed landscaping plans will be required for all areas shown to be in public R,O,W, Emphasis will he placed on providing low maintenance, hardy, indigenous plant material with no rock mulches in these areas if approved in concept. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, An Environmental Impact: Statement (EIS) will be required for this project, The developers./City have initiated a scoping Environmental. Assessment Worksheet (EAR) to determine what issues will need to be more thoroughly addressed, The EAR will, place emphasis on utilities and the :impact on the natural systems of the land, the existing water quality, sensitive vegetation areas and the vehicular circulation patterns and amounts generated by this project, All necessary State, County and City permits will be the responsi- bility of the developers at the appropriate times, It has not been determined whether an indirect Source Permit (ISP) will he required by the MPCA, but it appears that it will not be necessary. AESTHETICS: Landscape elements such as light standards, signage, placement and style of mailboxes and plantings in the R.O.W. and individual lots have been proposed, Control of these elements will enhance the development greatly. The intent is positive, however, strict criteria governing the placement of these elements will he necessary to eliminate maintenance conflicts and ensure public safety, The City has implemented/enforced a Landscape Policy with mimimum size reclui_rrents, These shall remain in effect:, 21 caliper for overstory trees, l caliper for ornamentals and 6§ for conifers. EAR rN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER IS, 1986 PAGE FOUR GRADING/DRAIN : The present application is for a Planned Unit Development rezoning of 400+ acres. Until this PUP rezoning has been approved, it is premature for the developer to prepare any detailed grading or drainage plans. Presently, the various subdiv I s's an<=? l developments and "backbones" thoroughfare network is designed on a concept basis only.. However, an overview of this concept development reveals th.t the developer has taken into consideration the various major topographic and vegetative constraints associated with the 400+ acres. Detailed grading and drainage plans will have to be submitted wit-h the various subdivision applications as they are processed. At that time, a more detailed analysis can be performed. However, in order for this overall development to occur, it is necessary to install a major portion of the east central trunk storm sewer system. Basically, all drainage will be discharged into a variety of existing o n s i t: e drainage 'basins Iand collected . An a central point in the middle of the overall development. This storm water wi f t then have to he di. `u'-tiha jed through the construction of a major .t-if station and force main outlet into the existing trunk storm Fewer system pre>sentr_y .avail able on Wescott Wescott Road in the extreme northwest corner of this overall di V e 1_ opm eInt a From this point, a l l drainage facilities have been installed to convey the water to the Minnesota River. As a condition of the gals approval, it n will be necessary to conceptually address the required storage volume capacity of various drainage basins and their Inig'11i water elevations with a commitment by the development to dedicate all neccesary easements with any phased development or utility construction, whichever occurs first. t]TILITIES: Again, the conceptual layout of this proposed development does not provide the detailed information necessary for specific comments, However, it will be necessary to complete the trunk water main construction within Wescott Road and to install the trunk water main loop along Dodd Road to Diffley Road. Also, an internal distribution of trunk water main facilities will be necessary to provide adequate capacity and volume necessary to allow the proposed phased development, Population projections and water consumption will continue to be evaluated to ensure that adequatE:- wells and reservoirs are provided in advance of the projected need by this development This development is located at the tail, end of the last remaining major trunk sanitary sewer districts to be developed. This requires the installation of a major sanitary lift, station on the east side of Dodd Road, north of Diffley Road, outside the ?cope of this proposed development. All internal sanitary sewer systems will be collected and conveyed to this major lift station. A trunk sanitary sewer outlet for this district is presently available at the intersection of Dodd Road and Diffley Roads. It is anti ipated that the internal extension and installation of trunk sanitary sewer through this proposed development will be Phased in accordance with the development scheduled. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This development proposes the extension of two major community collector roads: Northview Park Road (from Nt `~iSe ..:I+4 Park to `~lr en;. Road); and .aJ yr.Ye o'r-1 (from t "s. Road h., EAGAN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE FIVE to Dodd Road). Both of these roads are on the state aid street system and would have to be constructed in accordance with state aid standards to ensure receipt of state financing. The proposed alignment is conceptual for this size of pr'o jecto However, it has taken i..nto consid.eratio1, the major topographic and vegetative constraints in determining its proposed alignment. At the present time, staff feels that there will. for a north/south 3]...° collector street near the western boundaries of this proposed development connecting Wescott Road with Diffley Road near the high school site. City staff will be contracting with a traffic/transportation planning consultant to determine the need, number, )-(.-.)Cation and I(1 ni I;tIlit design standards based on a traffic generation and distribution analysis associated with this de`,F l,opment Upon receipt of the results of that study, more definitive requirements can be determined relating to this proposed development. All other internal streets wi1.1_ be proposed with the individual phased development and will be required to meet existing City standards. With the first phased development of this proposal, it will be necessary to complete the upgrading of the remaining 1/2 mile gravel road section of Wescott Road from the ,.iC_;hl in.e crossing to South Hills, and to complete the installation of the curb and gutter along the south side of Wescott Road from South Hills to Dodd Road m County Road 63 (Dodd Road) is proposed to be turned back to. the City from the County by 198iPs At the appropriate time of the phased development of this overall. proposal, it will be necessary to upgrade Dodd Road to an urban road section. County Road 30 (Diftle:y Road) to the south is presently not scheduled in the County"s 5-year Capital. Improvement Program (CIP). However, it is hoped that the .~"3 ~.,,a t ~~L: h e results of the 4.... traffic impact analysis to be performed for this proposal will help the County determine the appropriate priority sequencing of upgrading D ff1ev Road from Dodd Road to Lexington Avenue. EASEMENTS/ R1 OF-WAY/PERMITS: The dedication or acquisition of all easements necessary for the construction of internal or adjacent collector roads, trunk utility installation or extensions and storm water ponding easements will be the responsibility of this development. Several of these easement acquisitions will involve property not incorporated by this proposed development such as the trunk sanitary sewer lift station, east of Dodd Road, and the Elrene Road extension to Dodd Road. All public right-of-way dedication shall be in accordance with City standards for the required internal and col lector streets and tra: lways , The installation of these streets and utilities will require the on acquisition of appropriate Metropolitan Waste Water EAGAN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE SIX Minnesota Dept. of Health (IiiDII) permits for the installation and extension of sanitary sewer and trunk water facilities. In addition, because of the major installation of trunk sanitary sewer facilities, it is anticipated that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (RAW) will be required with a potential for an Environmental Impact Statement (hIS) being necessary. In addition, any construction occurring within existing County road right-of-way prior to turnhack will require County permits. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all these regulatory agency permits are required prior to final plat approval of the first phase development w ASSESSMENTS: LAll property included within this development has not yet been assessed for any major trunk area utility improvements, As a condition of the POD approval, it should be required that this property accept its responsibility for all related trunk area assessments in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of project award or final plat approval, whichever occurs fir°st:m The length of the spread of any special_ assessments associated ' ith these trunk improvements should be determined as a condition of this PU'b rezoning approval, All trunk area assessment calculations will be levied on the net assessable area after crediting public right- off--way and pondi.n-g easements. CONDITIONS: 1. ® A 15 year Planned Development shalt be entered into and a phasing plan followed. 2. No development will commence until the Environmental impact Statement (EIS) has been completed 3s More specific information shall be provided for each block or phase of the development proposal including lot size/width, number of units, road dimensions, etc W 4A All surrounding property owners shall review and approve all trunk utility bet ions and major street locations for this development proposal. 5. This development shall be responsible for the dedication or acquisition of all required easements and rights-of-way necessary to install all trunk utilities, internal and adjacent collector streets and major storm water drainage basins in addition to all other internal residential street and utility easement requirements according to City standards. EAGAN HILLS FARMS DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE SEVEN CONDITIONS(continued) 6 a Trunk sanitary sewer, trunk w_a ar main and trunk storm, sewer required improvements- `,.s'h.31 z be o1 :1ered for installation by Counc?l action prior to the first prase final plat appro=val i ~ An internal collector street network thoroughfare plan shall be prepared and adopted prior to the first phase final plat approval, 8. The upgrading and completion of Wescott Road from the northwest corner to Dodd Road shall he ordered for installation by Council action prior to the first phase final plat approval. q, This development shall be subject to all conditions and requirements of the Dakota County Highway Department due to its frontage along County Road 63 (Dodd Road) 101 . All regulatory agency permits shal.l be acquired prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, whichever is required by the affected agency. 1.1, All plans and specifications for all public street or utility installation shall be prepared in accordance with City engineering standards, policies and codes a 12. This development shall be responsible for the installation of an 8 bituminous trailway adjacent to all internal or adjacent collector road improvements. i_d, This development shall be responsible for the installation of the internal collector road network in accordance with the requirements of the City engineering traffic study. 14, This development shall be responsible for all trunk area street and utility assessments based on the rates in effect at the time of project award or final plat approval, whichever occurs first a A CPP OR 1 u a j er `us cn .A 9P yyp i,!I 5- LOCATION MINI M.dlg'.- C. Rd 6iFFLEe-' ~ ~ "AD/ ~ ~ ZONING . 4 R II R-11 Ind. 1 t_J R -I R-1 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE Hs p p R-11 P R-11 L NB 1•_ RIII CS/GB/LB RI i R-t R11, R-11 e~. oW a ~ s lit ,338Vd K33'1w2Tai Slt*M r9T 6•T3NT 1st Q IV rq j} ee` r ' 113a3 ggQQgg z m.'t r7T 4-T3H 3NT e e 1 « Ell, ° W C u h ,o !6~ Y a ..n. .n« ~ 1 1 r t~ / C!V i if ;c K1 H It 1.+x t t( 1 1 < to r e \ gr > 1 till I wn~ i;r u;t><t N 900 adt xisting f +tiir~t^1r rri C lat C n 8,500 dt RnIA37 WESCOT I B 11 ~ RrFK till- ) 1 / EAGAN HILLS FAR a cpsK rite ;A A RD a 2, ra- r at 000 / I > t t 1 .k ti,~ ° 3,000 ac HVIEW BAR 2,000 dt so an m4vma~ 620 adt existing 2740 adt existin cP~4,500 adt 11112,000 adt ti I} PAr'~IC t RO•E •1 1 $E M~ ,o s ° s i33 STAFFORD PROPOSED PLACE , ( o ELE.. HIGH I ® M Ei! 7'1z SCHOOL SCHOOL " 1850 addtexi tang Rd. O. Ile ~u~. ltOn11 ~ i T 111 1111-1 Li PRELIMINARY PROJECTS ` ° C TIS I I I I t~ 1 d ° I Yt~i+R r LAXNP-L~ ~ w 1, it i. t I. ~"I 3" ( L~1 YEAR 203( AIs cttrl (t?R~J SOURCE: DAHL R N SHAR®LOW & UL:" K= aA11 1 i 1 a, i I~0 I;/. r)f N + C} c~r~~ r+~ BOLDER FIGUR $ RESENT PROJECTED ADi k % ti, ) ' s i . i ; r t NE GHBO NO~ I ! y r~ RESIb4NTIA COtvIME AL t Ala 9 , zi-F3ESIDENibk -ESfiDEi$T1Al y1 DE%V 54" , RESIDE ?~ja r _Ir1 ~1 671 ° ' PARK 5-' mss`- i a 7 , J i , r. ,w, PAR{ fr ;r. RESIDE , INSOCKrUL Jo`E DENJIAi~'` ROAD - ` IfYJ Us `4 9 P y4 f ,a .y. RESIDCik PAhK PRESIDENTIAL nrreoue?yo«w""MIL 3 ~2;og~cccu coUlzm wmmTxu RESIDENTIAL aoueCTO~ wme J ur \ , , _ / i ~Y~ d f , ~«cuoras®Tbavuw~Fm6uedsw® + ' ~ \ s ~ RESID ALl TOTAL SITE ACREAGE 404 AC. r a_ A f( t `ff ' COMP. PLAN DENSITY ALLOWED 3-6 UNIAC. GROSS r e 1 COMP. PLAN UNITS ALLOWED 1212-2424 UNITS PROPOSED DENSITY RANGES San Hills Farms RESIDENTIAL 1-6UN)AC. Jr CJ MARK ' Eagan Joint Venture HIGH DENSITY 14-34 UNJAC ' r T , ao R SIDE NT~AL"--,' y Ll l Eagan, Mn. % CONCEPT PLAN DENSITY TOTAL AC. 404 sl V341 A I W PARK AC. 54 REStC}ENTiAL' ; RESIDENTIAL AC. 318 318-1896 UNITS HIGH DENSITY AC. 32 320-980 UNITS 8 7 t { °ym t s <ov 638-2856 UNITS j' s3 .fitSIDENTIAL. e i t YCi TARGET OVERALL GROSS DENSITY NOT TO EXCEED $ s vim' i ? ? Land Use 's on ~ Plan 4UNIAC. GROSS OR 1616 UN S 085 404 AC. r S TARGETED FOR LARGE LOTS FAMILY e\ _~1j f1' fe, d +A -q :2>'L~ aN.4 ~ ~ia'. 1. ~ i B ~ A D ~ ~ \;t psi//'~ }?*A UC J is a ffi -XI BLOC(1 'te'a , BLOCK'2" 13~ t ~rx ~ o• . ~e , ~i. .r 5~{}, M° 'r.'mt jam- ®y2•q % mi P Park BLO9K -4 1 i, e -1 t _ l f 7= O C Q' BLOCK 8' T ~k~_ ~T ~l'~.at r'^.2 aka ~'A°r_' r lltltt Y j f,~r BLOCK6 ~'"'°l, rr'~~~}~ -=-~~`-ltJ°!%{ / t ~b_. .,~--•~,_,/1 'I _ i rf "I _ - / I~~~y, a°. rr, a' /rfi•g a~ati'a-:~,SA~~lrvi V,r ~ _ - t. t - a itla•s Wpie wi theo'~ ~ f~~X _ - aga his Farms Par' Eagan joint venture '1 OBLOCK Blocks 1 V j a Mao Fw fttN&a r 9 ,"\~}\\j y Wacker ~ j/tr H '~i- , ( aasketbaC t ®-+a' t';l ....1 • ` lcior a1 RtId ACG,ifies cl -'f- ~1° 4 Mme- f - m T a Fooiba® 5.11baf e i .}~I.1>~z-i} r P2lfS Tot//lots Futwo R j t " 7 t Ae obnsW Puk l Pafk j' t t~•f 10"Haf4Tfa f ~~°~(a ••~=E .-e-_.s s --1 ....~-~es.__ e ` _ - 1'=6' 3091 T6aN - IL- Pack C=D SOW Eagan Hills Farms 1" `~~^••-'4"'_ Par&~ ~ Lg f. Eagan Joint Venture Eagan, Mn. I E it r ka v, ak Parks Plan PHASE PHAtE,s PHASE 2 <r PHASE ,.t f\,r` 777 t' ~,y 4 , ark' ~Rnf" S~ Tr Park PKA E 2 j;.3 6 ; _PL 3 y f :i Perk PHASE,1 ¢ o • Pardo PHASE P.1 ~D. L]FE 15 YEARS Park cs l v, PHASE 1 198T-1988, PHASE 2 1988 PHASE 3 Eagan Hills Farms 1989 Par * = ' }!r Eagan joint Venture PHASE 4 1990 " i . Eagan, Mn, nPHASE 5 1991 PHASa4 wuxxxv PHASE 6 1992 Or si AND t'ww PHASE? 1992-1999 Staging Plan )Cf 'ss 1 '~..~.°..+_+-•--t--•-• - ~~Sp. ;-'1..' It _ ®.°°°®-®"'°°1-®-'"'. CAS ona 71 ~y s~ l :i 1 i~ ~1fl~Q 114 Sji p s/pCl , 4 6` d~ 'Mats pes h. OC1 v~~~i nax ioafla~ r, Gam/ existing vegetation`, proposed pond Is, rr d ? E' y /~O rJ~ j acc ss sr 1 UQ~ CS future high school_ par p proposed pond a~ proposed pond Ld <an Joint Ve'nture' Stafford place Eagan, Mn. act sail Natural Features 71- iv \ ~3} '"1 ray s /j j• Legend p t d SenU ry Sewn! "f I _ • sj $74rm Sewer ! d f~v ~ Eagan Hills Farms were! un~e r-- f Eagan Joint venture p r{y ;w.~. Eagan, mn. t~U Hi,i.I \ "a - # IIVJVw +~t °xt'~• -t-~t-9' , _ e tCO^ sac' a .s a i f !M1 1 Utilities MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DA : JANUARY 2, 1987 RE: JOINT DEVELOPMENT - SCHOOL/PARK SITE - MUELLER PARCEL BACKGROUND In 1985 the City Council authorized the Parks and Re _r c P 1r°G.;1eat to jointly purchase property with School District #196 for a Tutu, l_-Jrentary school/park in Section #14 of the City. In early 1986, the City and the District purchased a twenty-eight (28) acre parcel north of Westcott Road and east of the present Greensboro Addition, known as the Mueller Parcel. Ten (10) acres of this twenty-eight (28) acre purchase was financed by the City for parks development. Staff from the School District have been in contact with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the development of this site. If the March 10th, 1987 School Bond Referendum is successful, this site appears to be the logical location for the next elementary school. In order to have the school available for the 1988/89 school year, planning must begin now so that construction can start on the site/building in late April or early May. A vital piece of information for the City Council is recognition that when the twenty-eight (28) acre parcel was purchased, there was no clear delineation of which ten (10) acres were owned by the City, and which eight en (18) acres by the School District. In essence, the twenty-eight acre parcel is jointly owned by the City and District. Second, at the time of the purchase, the Director of Parks and Recreation, conveyed to the school district, that funds for acquisition were taken from the Park Site Fund, rather than through dedication. Therefore, development funding would not be available until some future"date;,i.e., a future bond issue. STAFF MEETINGS In early December, representatives of School District #196, Tom Schwartz and Cal Zwiefel, met with Steve Sullivan and Ken Vraa, regarding what might be the best approach for the City and the School District for the development of this twenty-eight acre parcel. Cal Zwiefal and the Director of Parks and Recreation felt that it was important that an agreement be reached covering the development of the entire site, because of the symbiotic relationship between the school and park needs. The School District needs the plan.ned athletic facilities, although the City is not able to finance the ent.-ire cost of construction of the park at this time. Consequently, the approac} to the development of the site is to be an intergrated approach, rather than a separation of the two. The School District representatives said that the District would be willing to construct ballfield facilities, regardless of who may be the actual owner, since the District tries to provide these types of amenities with every elementary school location. In return, the City would provide perpetual maintenance on these facilities, as well as development of other aspects of the park, including trails, benches, etc. At a second meeting, School District Architect, Ted Rosenbloom',wo , p. at with a footprint of an elementary school building, (replicating that U,' e Deerwood School facility), along with all athletic facilities necessary or" the park/school situated on the twenty-eight acre parcel. This plan is very similar to that which was initially prepared at the time of the joint purchase and reviewed by the City. One Plan was identified as being superior to the others, and direction was given to the Architectural firm to develop this scheme further for eventual review by the appropriate Boards, Commissions, and Councils. The beginnings of an agreement between the School District and the City regarding specifics for the development of the site, was also initiated. The purpose of agreement is to define and delineate specific responsibilities of both the school and the City for the eventual maintenance, as well as development. Assuming of course, that the site continues to be jointly owned and the definition of the City's ten (10) acres is not specifically identified. It was noted that the School District would be responsible for nearly 100% of the development costs associated with the site, with the City being responsible for maintenance, including the playfields, playground, fertilization, weed control, watering, sod, etc. The responsibility would extend only to a defined area, generally represented by the athletic and passive portion of the site. The immediate yard area adjacent to the school building would remain that of the School District. Staff is continuing work on this draft agreement, in hopes that it can be presented to the School Board and City Council for a timely reviewal. STAFF COMMENT The Director of Parks and Recreation is extremely encouraged by the cooperative spirit of representatives of the School District, and could characterize the potential for joint development as a "win-win situation". There will be a significant savings to both the school district and to the City using this development approach. In addition to the financial savings to both entity's, the mere fact that the park site will be developed in advance of what had been anticipated, provides a benefit to the community. The School District benefits also, because it will obviously have use of these facilities in advance of when the City would have been able to construct the park, and has already realized a savings, because additional property did not have to be purchased for athletic facilities/playground. The School District will also realize a savings during the life of this facility in reduced maintenance costs. 2 If there is a negative factor to consider, it's that the department already has an agressive program of parks development this year. This program will have to be modified/reduced in order to include the work this project would mean. FOR COUNCILICOMMISSION ACTION At this time, there is no action requested. This memo is intended to be na informative memo to update both the Council and the Commission regarding staff discussions. The School Board has not taken any official action recognizin, that this parcel will be the next elementary school location. In fa District Staff would rather not have the Board make a determination at time, for fear it might alienate some voters, because all three bui1'i: being proposed in the March referendum would then be in Eagan, i.e., h:L~~a school, middle school and elementary school. Voters in the southern part of the district may not appreciate the fact that they too will benefit from the building location in Eagan. Never the less, planning for the possibility must proceed if the District hopes to have the elementary building open for the 1988/89 school year. Members of the City Council /Commission that would like additional information or have concerns relative to this issue, please feel free to contact Director of Parks and Recreation with these concerns. I trust that Department Staff is proceeding with concurrence and approval of the Council/Commission on this issue. Respectfully submitted, Ken Vraa Director of Parks and Recreation KV/bls 3 REPORT LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP-29, JP-34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER P'.,.`V0JECT No. 479 FILE No. 49401 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ASSOCIATES, I ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA -3 ~ Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Associates., Inc. Ono G. Bonestroo, P.E. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. Robert W. Rosen, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, N.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P. Bradford A. Lemberg, P. E. Richard W. Foster, P. Richard E. Turner, P.E. Robert G. Schunkht, P.E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers Architects James C. Olson, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. St. Paul, 55113 Donald C. Bargardt, P. E. Jerry A, Bourdon, P.E. 612-636.4600 Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P. E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. November 20, 1986 Robert R. Pfeffrrle, P. E. David O. Laskota, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P. E. Honorable Mayor and City Council K a r e n L. W i l l i s . P . James R. Maland, P.E. City of Eagan Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Keith Mark R. Rolls, P.E. Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, Pb'. .Scott L. Young, P.E. Re: Lexington Avenue/Northview Park Charles A. Erickson Olson (Pond JP-29, JP-34 Outlet) HarlanLeoM. M. Olson Trunk Storm Sewer Susan M. Eberlm Project No. 479 File No. 49401 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our report for Lexington Avenue/Northview Park (Pond JP-29, JP-34 Outlet), Project No. 479. This report covers trunk storm sewer improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at,a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: November 20, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: -mot Department of Public Works Date: 0681e 36 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of gravity storm sewer out- lets for Ponds JP-29 and JP-34 as designated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. These outlets are required at this time due to the proposed develop- ments of Lexington Square 6th Addition (Northview Park Road) which will convey run-off to Pond JP-34 and Lexington Hills Addition which will convey run-off to Pond JP-29. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein iz feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the 1;j>t x° Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan with one exception. The exception being that its proposed to construct the storm sewer outlet from Pond JP-34 (located in Northview Park) based on a 5 cfs outflow (42.7 acre-feet of storage) as opposed to 10 cfs outflow (30.0 acre-feet of storage) as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The reduced outflow results in a HWL of 892.6 which the impact to the park is shown on the attached drawing. As shown, only the parking area would be temporarily under water during a 100 year event which is not felt to be significant. This project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing gravity storm sewer outlets from Pond JP-29 and JP-34 to Pond JP-9 as shown on the attached drawing. Pond JP-29 is located northeast of Lexington Hills Addition and will receive its storm water run-off. Presently Pond JP-29 is receiving storm water run-off from the existing storm sewer in Lexington Avenue which extends south from County Road 30 and is located in Lexington Hills Addition. Pond JP-34 which is located in Northview Park presently receives storm water runoff from only that area which is directly tributary to it. Design considerations for each pond is listed below: Page 1. 0681e NWL HWL Storage Pond Elevation Elevation Volume Outflow JP-29 926 945 52.4 Ac, Ft. 1.3 cfs JP-34 894 892.6 42.6 Ac. Ft. 5.0 cfs Storm sewer pipes range in size from 18" RCP to 42" RCP as shown on the attached drawing. EASEMENTS: The proposed storm sewer is for the most part located within City of Eagan park property except for that storm sewer located within Parcel 017-54. However, Lexington Hills Addition which is being platted at this time is located within Parcel 017-54 and a condition of its approval is that the required easements for this project be dedicated. Listed below is the ease- ment required for this project. Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 0.9 acre 4.3 acre AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4 Section 23 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-50 Parcel 014-26 (Part of Northview Park) Parcel 020-50 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 012-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 020-54 (Northview Park) Parcel 013-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-53 NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, 2 Block 1 Page 2. O681e 37 I COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $362,990 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es- timated at 30 percent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral assessment costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area storm sewer as- sessment which have not previously been assessed and benefit from this proj- ect. It is also proposed to assess the cost of the north-south 27" RCP storm sewer included entirely within the future street right-of-way as a lateral. This storm sewer is designed to convey run-off directly from Parcel 017-54 to the east-west trunk storm sewer and, therefore, its cost is proposed to be as- sessed entirely to Parcel 017-54. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project area as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Single - Family 0.050/sq.ft. Multi - Family 0.064/sq.ft. Page 3. 0681e REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of the project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $333,180 Lateral 29,810 Trunk Assessment $277,075 Lateral Assessment 29,810 $362,990 $306,885 -$56,105 The anticipated project deficit is $56,105. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 18, 1986 Public Hearing December 16, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications Winter, 1987 Open Bids/Award Contract Spring, 1987 Construction Completion Summer, 1987 Final Assessment Hearing Fall, 1987 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Spring, 1988 Page 4. 068le APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESrIM4TE LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP-29, JP-34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 479 40 L.F. 42" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $54/l.f. 2,160 950 L.F. 36" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $78/l.f. 74,100 80 L.F. Jack or auger 36" RCP storm sewer @ $250/l.f. 20,000 1,150 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $38/l.f. 43,700 400 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $68/l.f. 27,200 650 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $26/l.f. 16,900 500 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 10'-20' deep in place @ $42/l.f. 21,000 870 L.F. 12" RCP storm sewer 0'-l0' deep in place @ $20/l.f. 17,400 15 Each Standard 4' diameter MR with casting @ $1,000/each 15,000 110 L.F. Manhole depth greater than 8' in place @ $70/l.f. 7,700 1 Each 42" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $1,200/each 1,200 1 Each 18" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/each 600 1 Each 12" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/each 400 20 C.Y. Rip rap @ $100/cu.yd. 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $1,000 1,000 10 Acre Seed w/mulch and fertilizer @ $800/acre 8,000 300 C.Y. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $l0/cu.yd. 3,000 4,560 L.F. Mechanical trench compactor @ $1/l.f. 4,560 Total $265,920 + 5% Contingencies 13,300 $279,220 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 83,770 TOTAL $362,990 Page 5. 0681e APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP-29, JP-34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 479 A. TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Assessable Rate/ Total Description (S c.Ft.)_ Credit Area S . Ft. Assessment NW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 NP (1) 396,900 Street 20% 317,520 $0.05 $15,876 Parcel 014-26 NP (1) 132,000 132,000 0.05 6,,60G Parcel 014-26 104,000 104,000 0.05 5,200 Parcel 010-28 141,230 Large Lot 60,050 0.05 3,002 Parcel 020-54 NP (1) 106,500 64,000 0.05 5,325°, NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-04 64,000 64,000 0.05 3,200 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-50 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Parcel 020-50 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Parcel 012-52 NP (1) 1,296,900 Pond 84,000 970,320 0.05 48,51°° Street 20% Parcel 013-52 NP (1) 434,260 Street 20% 347,400 0.05 17,370 Parcel 010-53 1,685,640 Street 20% 1,348,510 0.05 67,425 Parcel 017-54 1,584,000 Street 20% 1,267,200 0.064 81,101 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 504,000 Street 20% 403,200 0.05 20,160 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, Block 1 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Lot 2, Block 1 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Total Trunk Area 277,075 B. LATERAL BENEFIT Parcel Description Total Assessment SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 $29,810 (1) NP - Northview Park Page 6. 0681e r'- t ! J % N +n m ,g E 6t N d w v N w - h 4 x 0 w r I y a O I ( fl w a C ~ 1 1 N p I 0. 0 ® J r 0 o p '3Ry NOIDNIX31 N Q O n O r h" W y d BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLI LEXINGTON / T VIE ASSOCIATES, INC. (POND JP- 29, JP-34 OUTLET) Engineers Architects SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota MINNESOTA TRUNK STORM EAGAN, Date: NOV. PROJ. No. Comm. 49401 r, f 0 500 1000 23 14- 0-2 14- 02 01 -26 010-04 010-50 NOR VI 020-50 01 PA Of -54 52 -5 010-78 01 53 KIRCHNER PLAZA ADD, LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK BONESTROO, SE, ANDERUK ASSOCIATES, INC. JP-29,JP-34 OUTLET) Engineers Architects TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: NOV 1986 Comm. 401 J. O. Agenda information Memo . December 1 a r ..ti9vE)s City Council 1 `c c'i_1no Pd`.{ Twenty PUBLIC HEAPIN FOR PR OJ4;C F' 485 T_REXINC` `O a I3 TI Iit) tiT f,~v,i t RTH i} a U 11 K ROAD I.'., Pun _tc Hearing for Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Additton/ Non iiiv uw Park Road (Streets and the c ont _ nn c+ phased C';'\ iclpIo ni of the L e o i_rlgto}; i u o o 6th, 'A<Jdi >n,, i I- ~d_l be Iraces. _ t_o to upgrade 501011 e Park 50.1'. Crom Lexington Avenue 1-.o the east line of the park property, n'. 11di nq the installation of 0Pp 03r,a e utilities, { On i•OvCTtlbc'r 18, tix, feasibility ~S~ o C ~o Council received a report and scheduled the lP public u'i1C hearing to be hold on December _.6= Enclosed is t cop-,_/of the feasibility report, - Y for the Cot n 1. t € S lot i L ltd L L C_,n and rot rence during this pu}r1 i;_' 1eariri Ali riot o : ho fir o been published hi i i1 1 ? 1 t -t.- owners to d1 i ~ }-7I' )~'pC'Y"' t-"%" ~'s ~~Y,C',~.~:.>d~d . La be .ltis;,':,>c_'C~ under this pro)e'(_'1_@ _onsGlLciit -n,y sr-aft pE'_TSr'. i1C'1_ Will 02 available W discuss this project in detail and answer any questions that may ' al sc° ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close Hie public he_ r it q 111101 approve/deny Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition,' Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize 1111 t>r pc ra-,ton of detail plans and spPcifications, REPORT LEXINGTON SQUARE 6th ADDITION PROJECT No. 485 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1986 FILE No. 49405 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ASSOCIATES, I NC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 05 Bonestroo, r 9 Rosene, r l r Associates, Inc. Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Hubert W. Rusene, P.E. Krith A. Gordon. P.E. B O Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes., P. E, Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P. E. Robert G. Sehunicht, P.E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers Architects James C. Olson, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. St. Paul, 551 13 Donald C. Burgardt, P. E. Jerry A Bourdon, P.E 612-636-4600 Mark A. Hanson. P. E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. November 6, 1986 Robert R. PfefJerle, P.L. David O. Luskota, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis, P.E. Honorable Mayor and city council James R. Maland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P. F. City of Eagan Keith A. Bachmann, P. E. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Mark R. Rolls, P.E. Eagan, MN 55122 Robert C. Ru.ek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P. E. Scott L. Young, P.E. Re: Lexington Square 6th Addition Charles A.L.'riekson Leo M. Pawelsky (Northview Park Road) Harlan M. Olson Street and utility improvements Susan M.Eberltn Project No. 485 File No. 49405 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our report for Lexington Squre 6th Addition (Northview Park Road), Project No. 485. This report covers utility and street improvements and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. C Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisign and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: November 6, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 i n Approved by:' ,rx_a partment of Public Works Date : 0439e 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of utilities and street in Northview Park Road to 1/2 mile east of Lexington Avenue. Northview Park Road abuts Lexington Square 6th Addition on its north side and Northview Park and one unplatted undeveloped parcel on its south side. Also included is upgrad- ing a small segment of Clinton Trail and Savannah Road immediately north of Northview Park Road. Northview Park Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid? Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT for the review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes extending an 8" diam- eter sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road east and west from Clinton Trail. The sanitary sewer will connect to the existing sanitary sewer in Clinton Trail located approximately 150' north of Northview Park Road. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the property abutting Northview Park Road and the property located south (Parcel 017-54) of North- view Park. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes extending a 16" diameter trunk water main in Northview Park Road east from an existing trunk water main in Lexington Avenue. Also included is the extension of a 6" diameter main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road north from Northview Park Road conrlectiag to existing 6" mains. The proper number of valves and hydrants is also include-d. Page 1. 0439e ` . I . r: The property abutting Northview Park Road is located in the intermediate pres- sure zone and will experience static and residual pressures of approximately 67 and 50 psi respectively. SERVICES: Sanitary sewer and water services (4" diameter sewer and 1" diame- ter water) are proposed to be extended 15' beyond the right-of-way line to each of the platted lots in Lexington Square 6th Addition and the unplatted property (Parcel 014-26, 6 lot equivalents) in anticipation of future develop- ment. Two 4" diameter water services for irrigation and one 6" diameter sewer service are proposed to be extended to Northview Park. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein includes two separate lateral sys- tems conveying runoff from two low points in Northview Park Road as shown on the attached drawing. The easterly storm sewer system will collect runoff from the backyards of Block 2 Lexington Square 6th Addition and the easterly low point in Northview Park Road. The storm sewer will be constructed along the main entrance road to Northview Park and discharge into Pond JP-34. Pond JP-34 presently does not have a storm sewer outlet, however, as part of Proj- ect No. 479 Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, the outlet for this pond is also being proposed at this time. It is anticipated its construction will occur next spring. The westerly storm sewer will collect runoff from the westerly low point in Northview Park Road and be constructed through the undeveloped portion of Northview Park. The storm sewer will connect to the existing storm sewer serving as the outlet for Pond JP-34 to be constructed as part of Proj- ect No. 479. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Northview Park Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 44' width which provides for parking on both sides. An 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side abut- Pa e 2. 0439e ting the park. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be constructed to a resi- dential design thickness and a 32' width. EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary easements from Lexington Square 6th Addi- tion will be dedicated through the platting process. Easements required from the unplatted parcel located south of Northview Park Road will be dedicated by separate document. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 Lot 1-19, Block 2 Lot 1-3, Block 3 NORTHVIEW PARK Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010-78 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Part of Parcel 014-26 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A,located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 61,850 Water Main 137,010 Services 48,880 Storm Sewer 105,630 Street 325,890 TOTAL $679,260 Page 3. 0439e T f The total estimated project cost is $679,260 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- of-way or easement acquisition. overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the lat- est bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a per lot or equivalent lot basis. Trunk area san- itary sewer has been previously assessed to all benefiting property under Project 365. WATER MAIN: The 16" water main in Northview Park Road is considered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess the property abutting Northview Park Road the lateral benefit from trunk rate based on the residential equivalent rate. The lateral water main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition based on its final cost. It is also proposed to assess those parcels within 1/4 mile of the trunk water main their trunk area water assessment if they have not been previously assessed. Lex- ington Square 6th Addition and property adjacent to Lexington Avenue were levied Trunk Area Water Assessments under Projects 467 and 395 respectively. SERVICES: Services are proposed to be assessed based on the total cost of each service serving that lot or parcel. Page 4. 0439e STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral. Therefore, it is pro- posed to assess lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis to the benefited property adjacent to Northview Park Road. Trunk area storm sewer for this area is proposed to be assessed as part of Project No. 479 Northview Park, Trunk Storm Sewer. STREET: Northview Park Road is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis based on the residential equivalent rate to all property abutting Northview Park Road. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road are proposed to be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. In addition, it is proposed that the bituminous trail be assessed entirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project are as follows: WATER MAIN Trunk Area: Single-Family $1,190/Ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk: Single Family $11.88/F.F. STREET Residential Equivalent $33.75/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $ 61,850 Lateral Assessment $ 61,850 $ 61,850 $ 61,850 0 - Pag,, 5. 0439e i Project Cost Revenue Balance WATER MAIN Lateral $ 6,550 Trunk 130,460 Lateral Assessment $ 6,550 Lateral Benefit from Trunk 61,341 Trunk Area 96,390 $137,010 $164,281 +$27,271 SERVICES Lateral $ 51,630 Lateral Assessment $ 51,630 $ 51,630 $ 51,630 - 0 STORM SEWER Lateral $105,630 Lateral Assessment $105,630 $105,630 $105,630 - 0 STREET Street $325,890 Street Assessment $214,506 $325,890 $214,506 -$111,384 The anticipated project deficit is -$84,113. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. Page 6. 0439e PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 18, 1986 Public Hearin, December 16, 1986 Approve Plans & Specifications 19'87 Open Bids/Award Contract Spring, 1987 Construction Completion Fall, 1987 Final Assessment Hearing Winter/Spring, 1983 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1989 Page 7« 0439e APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 A. SANITARY SEWER 2,500 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $13.00/lin.ft. $ 32,500 8 Each Standard 4' diameter MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 7,600 20 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. $70.00/each 1,400 1 Each Connect to existing 8" sanitary sewer @ $300.00/each 300 36 Each 8"x4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 1,800 1 Each 8"x6" wye branch @ $70.00/each 70 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,450 Total $ 47,120 +5% Contingencies 2,360 $ 49,480 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 12,370 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN 2,620 Lin.ft. 16" DIP water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 68,120 450 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 5,400 5 Each Hydrant in p1. @ $1,000.00/each 5,000 2 Each 16" Butterfly valve and box @ $1,500.00/each 3,000 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 2,100 12,000 Lbs. Fittings in p1. @ $1.30/lb. 15,600 1 Each Connect to existing 16" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 2 Each Connect to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 600 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 3,070 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,070 Total $104,390 +5% Contingencies 5,220 $109,610 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 27,400 TOTAL WATER MAIN $137,010 Page 8. 0439e 5~ C. SERVICES 2,160 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 12,960 55 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 550 1,900 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 13,300 130 Lin.ft. 4" DIP Water services @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,300 65 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water services @ $12.00/lin.ft, 780 39 Each 1" Corporation stop in place @ $40.00/each 1,560 2 Each 16"x4" tee in place @ $800.00/each 1,600 1 Each 16"x6" tee in place @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 39 Each 1" Curb stop and box in pl. @ $80.00/each 3,120 2 Each 4" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $300.00/each 600 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 350 2,215 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,215 Total $ 39,335 +5% Contingencies 1,965 $ 41,300 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,330 TOTAL SERVICES $ 51,630 D. STORM SEWER 880 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in p1. @ $34.00/lin.ft, $ 29,920 380 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in p1. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 11,400 620 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 16,120 120 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,880 140 Lin.ft, 12" RCP Storm sewer in p1. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,080 6 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 5,700 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 7,200 1 Each 27" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 4 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 240 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,000 2,140 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft, 2,140 Total $ 80,480 +5% Contingencies 4,020 $ 84,500 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,130 TOTAL STORM SEWER $105,630 Page 9. 0439e c APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Total Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 11 $1,672 $ 1$ Lot 1-19, Block 2 19 1,672 31,761 SECTION 23, NW 1/4 Parcel 014-26 6 lot equiv. $1,672 $ 10,029 Northview Park 1 1,672 1,672 37 $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN a.) Trunk Area Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (ac.) (ac.) Area (ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 012-26 (N.P.)C1} 9.0 Street 20% 7.2 $1,190/ac. $ 8,5F8 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 7.5 Street 20% 6 $1,190/ac. 7,140 Parcel 010-04 7.5 Street 20% 6 1,190/ac. 7,140 SW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 012-52 N.P.)(1) 29.8 Pond 2.1 ac. Street 20% 22.2 $1,190/ac. $ 26,418 Parcel 013-52 (N.P.)(1) 10.0 Street 20% 8.0 1,190/ac. 9,520 SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 $1,190/ac. $ 18,32 Parcel 010-78 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 1,190/ac. 18,8')2 $ 96,390 (1) N.P. = Northview Park Page 0439e .1 b.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Front Assessable Total Description Footage Credit Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-11 906.39 906.39 $11.88 $ 10,768 Block 2, Lots 1-19 1455 1455 11.88 17,285 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 147.87 11.88 1,757 Northview Park 2107.16 2107.16 11.88 25,033 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 547 $11.88 $ 6,498 Total 5163.42 $ 61,341 c.) Lateral (6" Lateral on Clinton Trail & Savannah Road) Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, 2, 3 $ 6,550 $ 6,550 C. SERVICES Parcel No. of Total Description Services Cost/Service Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION B ock T, Lots 1_11 11 Res.(l) $ 998 $ 10,979 Block 2, Lots 1-19 19 Res.(l) 998 18,964 Block 3, Lots 1-3 3 Res.(l) 998 2,994 NORTHVIEW PARK Sanitary sewer 1 - 6" $ 722 $ 722 Water Main 2 - 4" 4,593 9,186 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 6 Res.(l) $ 998 $ 5,989 Parcel 014-26 1 - 6" 2,796 2,796 Total $ 51,630 (l) Residential Service = 4" Sewer and 1" Water. Page 12. 0439e D. STORM SEWER (Lateral) Parcel Front T;-. Description Footage Rate/FF As.Jt.: -:it LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, lots 1-19 906.39 $20.46 $ 18 542 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1,455 20.46 29,7")5 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 20.46 3,025 NORTHVIEW PARK 2,107.16 20.46 43,108 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 20.46 111,190 Total 5,163.42 $1 3,66'0 E. STREET a.) Northview Park Road Parcel Tot-1 Description Front Footage Rate/F.F. Assesc LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-19 906.39 $33.75 $ 30,591 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1455 33.75 49,106 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 33.75 4,991 Northview Park 2107.16 $33.75 $ 71,117 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 $33.75 18fit Total 5163.42 $174,266 b.) Clinton Trail and Savannah Road Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th Addition $15,900 $ 15,900 c.) Bituminous Trail Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th Addition $24,340 $ 24,340 Page 13. 0439e 67 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 COST/LOT, PARCEL Sanitary Storm Parcel Sewer Water Main Sewer Total Description Lateral Trunk Lateral Services Lateral Street Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 $ 1,672 $ 1,102 $ 998 $ 1,556 $ 3,786 $ 9,114 Lot 1-19, Block 2 1,672 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 9,114 Lot 1-3, Block 3 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 7,442 ..NORTHVIEW PARK $ 1,672 $44,506 $25,033 $ 9,908 $ 43,108 7 $195,344 ~~Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26) NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 $ 7,140 $ 7,140 Parcel 010-04 7,140 7,140 SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 $18,802 $ 18,802 Parcel 010-78 13,802 18,802 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Part of Parcel 014-26 X10029 $ 6498 $ 8785 $ 12,192 $ 18461 $ 54965 TOTALS $61,850 $96,390 $67,891 $51,630 $105,630 $214,506 $597,897 Page 14. 0439e om ca "S n C r m t'' x- 7 ~-d m ` 11 1 a, t I l N t 11V81 Na1N11 / ~ l 7 oa _v M/a 133m1S 32i inj rn 0._p ° L0 ° _ x 3flN3A Q± NIX31 LEXINGTON SIXTH I ADDITION ~3 C £x ~`C~ HE A)ERr !-1K (NORTHVIEW ASSOCIAmES, INC. Engineers & Architects SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota Pp RR (0) J No, 44w83 55 Date: OCT. 198(' q IN EAGAR MINNESOTA Comm. C4940 1 . C9. 1 w OV08 FI VNVS $1w °a aa^ S r®¢ a 8O p w ® II / 11V NOlNI1 w z D 0 h M/H 133HIS 38tlin,U wJJ F- yy ® a a ~ 11i ~ W Q Q z ..1 N _ l39 O a W ~ J I 3nN3Ad OJ.9N1X3"1 LEXINGTON SIXTH ADDITION O ES , ROSENE, ANDERLIK (NORTH I ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT No. 485 Date: OICT. 6 EAGAN MINNESOTA comm. 9405 Ft 9 tit TICONDEROGA ROAD / 010-04 0 10 -03 012-26 c.7 z x w 0 13- 012-52 010-78 010-7 52 BONESTROO, RC3Es° , A DERLi (NORTHVIEW PARK ASSOCIATES, I NC. Engineers c Am y ti t TRUNK AREA WATER ASSESSMENT AREA S2. PcuI, P~Er << E PROJECT No. 485 auto: f~~T.il 3-5 p ^ t mm FF 8 F r M s'f g t 23 N VAVS t p" Q h g 10 W 6 U) I wa t W t U) 1 q J 1 Cr M a 1...1 to 1I-- e+a ` 'a C •h p 1 m. - a ~ } h m '-7 cc V) h 1 ID t~ a: W on I ~I r i 1IV}J1 NOINI'13 t I Q 0: r- D 1 M/ .L33ti1S 3aftift3 °"o re 0 N NB u? n.. q Cr 0. q 61 0 U.i p p1 _J gag 1 j t 0A 3fN3AV NOIDNIX31 LEXINGTON SIXTH ADDITION ONES OO, ROSENE, AN ERLIK PARK ROAD) & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers Architects STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT o.4 =at i'.DJ56 L=..==EAG So 85 EAGAN, I Fig. O. ti a o w z a e ih I I f?' 1IV lNO1N11O _j t I~ f M/a 1338iS 3uflln3 W:l N N W I` b st u.t"t I~s a o ~ gg o _a a flj''z i i.. Lj 3 CMa ti9d 4949 r ..6. LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION ES , Ro ENE, At=:C --l.( r; PARK ASSt C~ ES iql . nOAD) Engineers b ArcbJsects STREET IMPROVF J `S St. PC Minnesota PROJECT No. 1, i Gacate: t~C EAGARi, MINNESOTA Com 4`40 . s Q. ' i