4018 Nicols RdCITY OF EAGAN Aemarks Cedai' Grove Acquisition
Addition Cedar Grove #3 Lot 1 Bik 8 ParcL1 10 16702 010 08
owner streec 401$ Cedar Ave. State Eagatl,MN 55122
L?i ? ?t ?LIL.. j• , , ? ; , ?. ?
Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date
STREET SURF.
STREET F ESTOR.
GRADING
5AN SEW TRUNK
# SEWER LATERAL 1972 TO2.00 2.0 2
WATERMAIN
WATEA LATERAL 1 9?2
WATER AREA
STORM 5EW TRK
STORM SEW LAT
CURB & GUTTER
SIDEWALK
STREET LIGHT
WATER CONN.
BUILDING PER.
SAC
PARK
4-2G-77
? 5 -
1pt to Sast is poor building site - pc.id extends from East of axea to i
-'° tallantrae property.
Y?+ '{klghLors also have "riFhte" to 'reLain status quo (retention of 2 alatted b+
loCe) as well as petitlaner.
Obiections to eyebrow cr bubble cul-de-sac off Gold Trail F;
difficult to maintain
? p. safety f.actor re: thoroughfare
C. t:aific proLlems (
;do public benefit in appxoving concept. No proven hardship involved.
? Bite is more suitable for two lots with one duplex on each lot.
`ks[hetics would be undesirable with eyebrow cul-de-sac & location of
-;propcsed huilding.
Pwdinn problem not resolved in proposed plan.
Aukward parcel to develop for tLe design planned, eapecially Rast lot with ,
lsrge out-lot behind pond & tree liue.
Qmer purchased the property k.nowing there were only 2 single family lote.
:It uould 6e e.x)propriate to develop the land in coniunctlon with planning
m the vacant lot to the west.
;,u= fiere are no one-quarter circle pimples simi3ar to that proposed for the
" duplexas elsewhere in the City.
..;,? Possible danger from the small cul-de-sac concerniug exits onto the street.
mAti CROVF. t10. 3, 1ZI,OCK 1, REZOIIIIdG. An application from Lawrence 4lenzel to
Itote 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 of Cedar Grove No. 3 currently desiPnated R-1 on
wing map to LB-Limited Businesa. Also it cras noted that Lot 1 upon the
.
Emmcil's motion be included in the rezoning. The proposal was for the
N
Mtlon of the Acorn Day-Care Center and future office buildinf;s on the property.
peleo noted that the reclassification from C-2 to LB was oeti.tted from the ?I!I'
smiug map in 1975. tleip,hboring residents appeared somewhat objecting to
?i
6enge and other askinp questions concerning the revision. Upon motion by
seconded $all, all members voting iu favor, it was RESOLVED that the
ytetiou he recocmended for approval.
9TPI DAY-CARE CE2aTER - FI2LD CHRISTOPHEftSON CONDITIbNAL USS PERMIT_ Mr• Fred ;
?Itopherson appeared on behalf of his application for conditional uae permlt to ?
,
pte a day-care center on Lot 4, Bloclc 1, Cedar Grave ?]o. 3 and a 10' variance i,
'i
Atear lot line setback requirenent. TLe building would consist of a 3,000 sq. II
?
° _4.. ?
5-3-77
at an earlier time and thcre had been several appearances befor: tha Coimcil
nP th13 development. The proposal would inc?ude 3 sets of duple•ses on
8, Lan,hoven Addition and according to the c.pplicant, the minimum require-
f the subdivision regulationa wou13 be met by the plat. Th°re was a minor
in the line between Parcels A 6 B to provide for setback requirements to
with the ordinance. The APC recommended approval. There was further
ion concerning the half circle and objections by cerCain Council members and
:t that there would be a cul-de-sac at an interior street rather than at the
There were also questions raised concerning the appropriatenesa of Parcel
buildable lot with 15,270 square feet of land area. Polzin moved and Rahn
;d the motion to approve the application for prelininary plat with an adjnct•-
: the line bet:aeen Pareels A& II to comply with the ordinances with the
:anding that no variances would ',e needed. All membera voted yes c.:o_PZ '.:urtth
:ed no. t4r. I:lein requested consideration by the Coim cil of the 7;iyoat
ally proposed with 9 foot variancea for sideyard setbacks for each Luild.tnr.
aas a questior. concerning the grant of a ponding easement and iir. ArPelbanm
r indicated that he would grant in the event of approval of the ia;out.
-in indicated that he expected fir. Appelbauun would dedicate the ponding
ecessary for drainage purposes with the understanding that the i:ecessary park
ti.an wil.l be conplied w1th. Polzin then moved to approve the 1ayouC w:t`h
r:aace and there was no second. The motion then died for a]acfc nt ._ Jecend.
'- ;'=:n,M 110. 3- REZONItdG The application of Lawrence fdenzel tu .rezone
:i and !F, ?lock E, Cedar Grove PIo. 3 originally zoned C-2 - Hc;:ivy C•.'?LL.?,r.et31
r,ording to the recent zoning map is zoned R-1. In additi^--.k. J.ot '... %J ?r.k 1
L.rove ldo. 3 was also included foi rezoning. It appea:refl et;as: th:?re *r3a a
,,, ia not changing the designation of the property to 1.;1: -*..-<<:: 'i-,1
ind the application had been recommended for approval tiy tha AF^. Up<m mot-lon
:n, seconded Polzin, all members voting yea, it was RESOLVI:D that Che rezoninE
:s 1., 2, 3& 4, Block 1, Cedar Grove No. 3 to L13-Limited Business be appxcvzd.
-6-