Loading...
01/09/1986 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionTENTATIVE AG t ►A ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION CO SS ON EAGAN, MINNESOTA EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 7:00 P.M. JANUARY 9, 1986 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda and Minutes of December 5 Meeting C. Development Proposals 1. Greensboro preliminary plat/P.D. - Dave Gabbert 2. Remick Addition - Mark Remick 3. Deerwood School, I.S.D. 196 4. Silver Bell I, Dallas Development - office warehouse 5. February proposals D. Old Business 1. City Landscaping Policy 2. Park Systems Plan - Updating 3. Dakota County Bike Plan - Co ission's letter of support E. New Business 1. Park Acquisition Request - D. LeMay (Deferred from December 2. Volunteer Recognition - (Deferred from December '85) 3. Snowmobiles 4. Rahn Park - storm sewer project - Project #452 5. Parkland study - Service Section 21 F. Park Development 1. Report - Finalization of I.C. 85-14 - spring construction contract 2. Construction Update - lighting contract 3. 1986 spring construction - time line 4. Building construction estimates - park shelter buildings G. Other Business and Reports 1. Joint meeting - January 28th - Park Planning Cooperative 2. Golf netting - staff report 3. Round table discussion 4. Scott Morgan 5. Ohmann property - update H. Adjournment - J TO: 4.`?ORY PARKS FE( ,Dot .,( : [ON Janus byes meeting i pp tly goil _ to set ? ton or the ye rather lengthy agenda for t'.?z Commission. DEVELOPMM PROPOSALS There are four development proposals to be rev' the first is the Greensboro P'eliminary Pl whist I e adjac t property jointly d fo- ''stool In rev, ' re :< cash de,' ,ation along t L1 ;,i 1. It Re:- `'°``.tion which is for a singlE ly lot sp. immediat, ly 7 - -th of Highview Park This i ?viewed by ° `ie Advisory Plan ion in December, but action aw r red until J - -°'y. Staff has IV L.'. lysis of this proposal for '' ° M ? _x with the ._sion. -Hew of hi_-q preliminary plat, a parks location this F S ; i b an issue. Members who were involv 1 'th th i study m v .call that Park Service Section eke ne of `- i -h def in t . Dn of a neighborhood park r a ?iveeu 1 -.on. ",:-e, staff has initiated - '- -1.y planne- I Ls scheduled this for rc wi -.dez Bu ?"ge The fourth development is an office warehouse b i proposed off Silvi , Road by Dallas Development, Staff is re-- A_--ig a cash dediu. oa, requirement. OLD T,,, t',,r,'- items under "Old BuQ the first i- ,f the lsi .. Pg policy and an u ding this illy, thi- policy is now in effect and each nary plat being d by staff must come in compliance with this policy. as presented with the understanding that those se- t, having to do with demographic data wi ll be reviewe~' -t a future t1 -e. t the last Commission meetinr, Alt WE prepare a draft of upport and it # nt concern h Dakota Coi t Plan. Dis -®i -I of t'' letter, ?_s 1' as an v t ng, has resulted n a meeting with L iKota planninr, s, ?f sched,.l= Oar lien in the day oR. January 9. wSINESS The first two ig under " e__ , '.eferr-d 1985 meeting. The it.. ._-ve again IL--'e -' -__ your r' Item #3 is a report regarding snowmobile activity within the City. 2 contained as an informational memorandum. Item #4 concerns a prono I storm sewer project which would affe t Project #452. Again, za.ion relative to this project 1 -t the p - -es -s from t' ? City Engineering Di , . Jill be at th a , further -- _ l in. the proposed project/feasibility rer.w questions b t.e Commission. Enclosed is a -+ _ i°zdicati- t3-e 1986 _ , --traction . it would be anni r , to for v Commission -v --.-'-w this t i 1 for approvals. `" ° s will note t' ° this is a very compressed tim °° (-_hen has it ever be, different?) for cc ' -,ion of this year's spring const action program. Item #4 concerns building construction estimates for thf p :er buildii ®,. The architectural firm has prepared nei i Isuction the p 7helter buildings b< m -?d on the cor Hoy estimai, 3 are not yet cot _ l -rig review and v g a for cw Hill Park. T~ p tting, staff wcwld l._ to ! t' estimates with the Co is an informational i m. P action necessary at this timf Lnd can be deferred until the first meeting in February. The last item is an update on the Ohmann parcel. y submitted, t -I®s Recreation KV/js MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF T SUBJECT TO APPROVAL ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 5, 1985 AGENDA Parks & Recreation Director Vraa added a few items to "Other Business". On a motion by Fedde, seconded, the agenda was approved as amended. The motion carried. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 7$, 1985 Two minor corrections on page three were noted. "Acre" instead of area and "success", not source. Commission member Masin moved, Alt seconded, to approve the minutes as corrected. All voted in favor. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 1< Yor on dustrial Park South - Preliminary Plat 2. Norwest 3rd Addition Adv. Parks & Rec. Comm. December 5, 1985 3. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - eplat 4. Hardee's Restaurant - Conditional Use This proposal for a conditional use is on a platted lot and is subject to the $.02 per square foot cash dedication. The Advisory Planning Commission has given approval and a landscape plan is to be submitted with the building plans. Commission member Alt moved, Fedde seconded, to approve the $.02 per square foot cash dedication. The motion carried. 5. January Proposals Adv. Parks & Rec. Comm, December 5, 1985 The staff is to write a memo to the City Council so they are aware of the recommendation and staff report. 2. Dakota County Bike Trails Plan NEW BUSINESS The two items under "New Business" - Park Acquisition Request, D. LeMay and Volunteer Recognition - were held over to the January meeting. PARK DEVELOPMENT Trapp Farm Park - Picnic Shelter Trapp Farm Park - Warming House Goat Hill Park - Shelter Rahn Park - Small Shelter 4 Adv. Parks & Rec. Comm. December 5, 1985 2. Construction Update 3. date - Ohmann Site Acquisition OTHER BUSINESS & REPORTS 1. Communications With Planning Commission - Chairman tin 2. 3. Sno oiler and golf practice areas were held over to the January meeting- 4. 4. 1986 lend ADJOURNMENT Commission member Carroll moved, Martin seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Time of adjournment was 11:00 P.M. Dated: Advisory Parks & Recreation Secretary CITY OF E AGAN SUBJECT: REZONING p PRELIMINARY PLAT GREENSBORO A PP 11, -1 CANT DAVE GABBERT LOCATION: W OF SECTION 14 EXISTING IONINC: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 1985 - DECEMBER PA x ?7 OF O-•_9 REPORT: ???4?e°??`.eI`k 9, 1_i8El REPORTED 3`? ? _ ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: C ?A??I(.,??'?ti An appL i_ r,t= £.;Pl. has hc eI'i submitted r :`Clll s._ 1 ilq <? rezoning IGn ii of -A 40 acre A, ( gC1 uii Lii a1 ) parcel to ,a _."1. P.D. lP 0 Devf'l 1 district. r?i: t 1 s site r _? (J?'ClC3rl??. is located Cc1 "t,L°t y )Litt !)!_ Carriage :tills Coil Course and .„ n'P ±.:_ [0 c otL Road. The P.D. .?1 is required because T t e r.?' are lots 111t1 hc: ?gsir120 ;cr V minimum as designatcc by City Code, , ZONING AND LAND 11SF r, r_?? _ i USE: The _?,t. ??'?t parcel has a < (:zn?? [i"?I 5Lr an l Co e Iqr]lC_'.("_% O R-2, 3_6 C _IIC unity per acre. The Plan ?,e , - ? proposed plat , all TR-'1 W1 L1 11a /C a Jr ;t s1 ty of 2.16 iln t`.'l qt os= czGr'_' Or tv 2.49 units/not acre, both of which an of o c f ic. E0-2 Pot allowance. Adjac,c_<8 land uses T r' ; P F ( g o ! f course) to the north, P.D. ingi " family) to the south and northwest and A to the souQwost and e< ? the proposed Wescott Elementary School siLeK SITE PLANNING /CODE COMPLIANCE: 'rho submitted site plan indicates 87 total 1C Lt=., 51 o ot.1cl1 , et LI"1 C.`._ y£a _ itc':lt 3n :i. r front yard width at the setback line. T:l cz ;_Y 1. ip 36 h-ncr' lot widths ranging between '75' -- 87 a Lh c c'_ c C _ line. Lot sizes also vary Cr?_0i this being Hic brealCuo'1r . 50 lots 12r4414 sq ft, 15 @ 11-12,000 ; : ' f r I2 @ 10-11,000 i o r and d I j @ 9-10,000 s.f. with the smallest at 9,520 s.f, ;11 smaller Ls are (I n ct] whore the '"f_ are C. ? _C _?S natural I ,_ amenity tt?_tt1 ..teJ such as the interior .portion the orb and tong the HI to r; border ..11 0 at to f s t?1C school property. The site is 'JrIE'. of numerous knot-Is and depressions. Mature vegetation iC .It -cr1 but most heavy around the Inc lying areas, Access to the site 1s from a loop road that connects to Wosco&L Road. An additional road will bisect t--he S i. ?' LY_'C11Tt the N.E. lots Lo abutting this street wili be parallel- t-o Williams Pipeline Ea_,e'rrtottt and w i l l _ £',ttl ire f1--1 rc y u r c » 0' ?k variances. A proposed cul-de-sac will extend -to th,( N.W. Irc)m this road servinq 4 into. _'L.i_ was Ut 1i"is a5 ,>C'i?ti'.tri('nditJOn LODE RF`'dddiNG & PRL';T,IMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DEC .'t,'M R 19, 1g35 PAGE 2 s t 5.ib(: for utilities be placed to the west and north should Car u Hil L Golf Course change use in the future. The do\`el p 1 of 1 _> project will tat<:: place in 2 years. Year one ai _ 1 no 1 into t:,,:^ ? oop road from Lh e west entry (from Wescott) to n prox i mu in v 2 _. The second year will see the continuation of tlie 1'_1' ?_) rc? Wescott Road, the secondary road and 2 cul-de-sac..,. COMMENTS: A trail is planned in the Wescott Rood rig l c f r at t110 time of street improvements. Staff has bean working oz? >rov t_h:.i_ng trail/vehicular connections between T ex: ngtci: t -: e South, the subject plat and the proposed school site. It our recommendation that a pedestrian connection through ne out; in T,e. ir gton Place South and the proposed plat let c r: ot- and 13 of block 1 be provided. Also, the possibility; of pin es:rno an 8' trail in the pipeline easement from the 1< ro t n t ht, school property be further researched. Staff E_:ri_ ptor tidy additional sketch plans for review at the December 19 "JPIC r:ee ` I t GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed grading for this dev-lcp[nc..it_ appears feasible from an engineering standpoint. Fo;ev>- c,u, to ttic rolling nature of this site, this grading plan doe -ot propose to fill nee i' small depressions. This is fin,-1 gas lone; as the developer constructs storm sewer outlets f roan r_fae depressions to prevent future flooding. Si11--,?,J1 This development is located in major drainage district u or on figure #l. As you can see from the Comprehensive Stor m hin>,c'r Plan, the northeast corner of this development includes a por_A_on of Pond JP-32. This pond presently has no storm se,vo c of l e, The Comprehensive Plan allows for two alternatives for conntruct nor; an outlet to this pond. One alternative is through :gin - s of ponds t r t r north and east and eventually to Po)-r<<" ;Tt'--1 ::: f u "rr. which the. ?, to7 r water would be pumped into Pond JP-1 `a , T,1 e otter alternative is to construct a 12" gravity line from Pond .P- % to the south and connect to the trunk storm sewer presently under contract with the Lexington Square Development. Staff re c Tic', S, the second alternative with the 12" line to the south bee .rise it will eliminate some additional water to be pumped from 11=t station 15 thereby reducing future maintenance costs nod no r_)i_ Lz costs for onnmp oversi,sing. Staff fu- her reec Amends this development provide for out 1cn tr. to several natural depressions within this development kesc bn as follows and illustrated on figure 2: 1) Ti^ 900 contour on lots 10 and 11 of block 1. 2) 899 contotm immediately west of lot 8 loomed wit 7-, n the Lexington Pluoc South Addition. 3) The 880 contour located within block 3, south of thto pipen? easement and north of Wescott Road. _i t .- _A1 - GREENSBORO REZONING & PREL: i`NA DECEMBER 19, 190 PAGE 4 right-of-way Staff _:1ri c;ec:i <`,!l iS However, "?'tc,mrC;?, i;.t_ the Lt o -- way for the c'ci L olc-- ;sic to N modificu slioghply lc're the meets the tau ent portion. This is r c L.3f i veiv ini nor ,.!' c be worked out with Lho developer dur i n the final ! a r r , c;.. , Also, the proposed 50 foot half r _, li+ _,i- .,`a dc, ._o .d_'xC with City Code FC7!" « :u' I I'?C l r?i °; rC?'' ri „-_< Road is in .;ccci ,. of-way with o. The City should require his delelopmeaL :"o dii a _ t hr utility easements; 1) The westerly 15 feet of lots 9 and 10, block L for ,, car sewer. 2) A 15 foot u- 1-ii ev. ,.m nt ref1Lct'o over 1 for storm sewer. 3) A 30 foot E a f,,,.or _ ) t within lot 24, block _ for sanitary _ _ (location to bebased on design). 4 ) A ponding easement encompassing t h 888.1 high water L v t nn for Pond JP-32., . 5) A potic?,i?A•, o,.;em,nt L r.c,m`:a :,iirq the SS! plovalion for _h,,- depression located wi r :z n binc[ 6) A 15 foot easement ovei:• lots 15 ail L b , block oo .,. <, 21 and 22, block _i_ for storm sewer. 7) A 15 foot easement locatpd across the , ", - lots 1, 2 and 29 of block 2 for storm wo . This co '.op cnt shall dedicate all aL'dA 0Ilat 0 .1s , rpb ., as ;lci- Cit; d requirements, TRAILWAYS: Because W: :, cot i Road is U: °ii tod a _Kror arterial roadway it requires a 5° sidewalk alort t0 nerd of Lt This sidewalk will be this development's e,r) .fl t0 i 1 1 . in'' addition, the Park De ar c.mrnt is looking to provide hrailwav access from the Lc \ ! nCjton Place c:fl [,!'? development westerly boundary of this development to the Lht J: ,--Jk prop located t'. c t- of this development, As 'H tOLs report, talc' location is U .iZ_ .. -?'[ '_ he responsible C U _., tiltS ?.F'V development will he for ;:C?crii11i1Ct the necessary casements and the financial r !")1 3L 1 o;r .. for +. construction of this 0--ailwcy wh : the Park. i npar r,E 0t: jut `_r i 7,pc -- the c Lual location. ,F7 N C & PRELIMINARY PLAT Gk. TNSBORO Di E_tP tt H, 19S5 PAGE Erosion cOa"11roi i shall be p2 o%l d` C{ On the r C _. _. ,el _. l rtaC if --,.L plan in accordance with the City's Erosion t on L l Manual. This development will have to revise the `.. tree L. grades to am _A for a 2% slope for LOO feet from all into • t ions with the exception of the cul-de-sac in block 3. Stair can accept the proposed grades on this cul-de-sac for the following reasons- 1) They small amount of traffic. 2) Coal c rt . i_rg the City Code would req;i,_ additional I_.. 1 C',Vc, ? _.TtC'! pe:r is prt7"?? t..,1tiu ?.ai :ran -?e above w?_i.i'.. the developer BraL lees Vi->:'I ne easement. The developer will lay.. o to obtain permission from Williams Brothers Pipeline Company 1o fill over the pipeline within the pipeline easement. UTILITIES: '-`i e E-'I1 t there are no City i . 11_'C. C I. a pi ace t o provide services to Lhc proposed development. However, City n jpct 433 provides E on: trunk storm and stnit ?,-°y7 sewer to rY? southeast corner of this development. Staff anKcipates this project to be under co,t_,+;cuction early next spring with completion by mid to late summer. T1 closest `rotormni n is at the intersection of Wescott Road an( ,. City Project 450 provides for r _ z, 1,;L.J_. t?-`t'ili:t'. C ? extension of the 'e'J3 ter..T'." ; r the east line of t i1:_' 'tV i t l 1 __ trunk ?i to aLPS and La Rue Addition 00''] :'c; it approximately 100 feet west of this de/ IL - srinL. This developer proposes on installintt aLi Ut it:.en and ?. C'?i,_?_aCi.. :5t_[_C.'Ls under .- pUiriiTherefore, prior f final 01 _ it approval the Council :l. must, authorize the improvements La e tenC1 ?,t watermain along 1Mc'.SC`oC:: Road to this site and o 1 . c eand the trunk sanitary and t , rnk storm sewer through to i_s site as rho Comprehensive ti t orm and Sanitary Sewer Plans propose STREETS; This entire development is bordered on the south by Pr .pmt Read. Wescott cad is presently a 20 LaoL gravel_ surface x ur:,l ;last . on roadway. This developer and they semnytoYl SCFUaLC` Development have petitioned for the upgrading of Wescott Read to Cil collector street status. Council approval for upgradinq of Wescott Reed should also occur prior to final rit a,pp; of this devej otimt'r.t. The proposed street layout to, this e b development ye w th fil exception Of the cul-de-sac in ., m Because there is no topographic h zrd.tii-f _ or difficulties in accessibility to the 03 it serves. in contrast to the southerly cul-de-sac, std i ecomii ends the elimination of this cul-de-sac and cent , t t tnp this street northwesterly through lot 8 of block REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT WYENSWRO DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS: The C_ LL); assessment ? coids i<<_i<' tt? that no trunk are ? w(-r. assessm area w?1c1?, S ,?_ ??n ta?y s ?._,,c ?~ ? _??ur?:? uz_ ents have been., levied this sanitary t l'J l' Y E - T:L s are pen 1 ir,? g under Project 433. F, . , : i ec • t 433 provides for th__ installa- tion of trunk s 17 t1ry and storm wec i ;l r o_,nh the LP`: W t__. SqL' ai c Addition Lo its n0rt 1 'ast r°a i a Because M_s d'. o; - I1teni will have to petition for II1n installation c iut'__. . ttie `_-.- i? ,l util i:: i es. L% would be ,p)pY o1>i_ ?t'' 1:? the i" rUi1k,. watermain an;, storm _,ewer assessments with that part icular projectA improvements Council authorization of he necessary +. t o this he lo will b?? necessary before His cl<??jc l?:? ,incrat. >., ment _ r ., ,.? __ i,;e nu ; plat approval. R}':;.1N'ING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1) Council shall authorize the rice nary p.:5 is mprovement projects to prop: de streets and utilities for this d: ?c log 1'(1 t prior to final plat approval. 2) This development shall obtain an easement or uthor zata_cr; from Williams Brothers Pipeline to perform grading , t vi n:_ns within the Williams Brothers easement. 3) Tl?e (1nnge plan shall incorporate storm water o_.t for depresAons located on lots 10 and 11, block west of lot 8, and within l c,ck 3, all is noted within nc r c>c' nc; Report. 4)All street gradc'q :-3t intersections shall meet City Code n t.ii the exception of the southerly cul-de-sac. 5) The northerly cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and the strait. .;tend .ed to connect to the looped street. 6) Ti c Council shall approve the upgrading of Wescott 'Road p-r i o c to finalplat approval. 7) The developer shall provide for a trailway as appropriate from Lexington Place South to the proposed school site st. of this development. 8) T1..-, developer shall dedicate a 50 foot half right-of---any _,6c Road, tine street looping onto WF c,,crtt roj 1._11 be, a mini.maum of 00 foot right-of-way with the other interior streets minimum of 50 foot right-of-way. 9) The developer shall dedicate the following easements; A. The westerly 15' of lots 9 and 10, block l for ctccr sewer. B. A 15' utility easement centered over lots 7 and 8, bloc' 1 for storm sewer. C. A 30' ease ment within lot 24, block 1 for sanitary sewer with f:tr_ location being based on final design- D. A ponding easement encompassing the 888.1 nigh water elevation for pond JP-32. E. A ponding easement encompassing the 881 elevation for the depression located within block 3. F. A 15' easement over lots 15 and 16, block 2 and jots 21 and 22, block 1 for storm sewer. G. A 15' easemaixt located across the common lot lines of lots 1, 2, and 29 of block 2 for storm sewer. 10) This development shall be responsible for the installation of a 5 concrete walk along Wescott Road. o q OW OR ¢ }a kJ/ }?3TT _ ?-? N -AL WI',. REST Al I N /j IOB R +?4 fTa i rr I _ r 9 ? ro °?° - X92 z9zv? a Xp ? m u.REENSBORO ,w - DP-ID DP _ --- g 0 1 0 D Sa&o BQ.O $ ?S C 4R Cf? HtILS -, 9 4.2 8? OP 23 4 Q E 9 893 0 2 " . DP -7 r 1 WESCOTT 8976 "' EAPY ARK. 882 2 NC Dc d 584.2 Qw a ro, CAR OLE E ARCEN _ L Ora L OP 22 ? s 5908 ?? r ! 8773.0 8540 T ,.892.2 12 8845 Y 0TCN 882.0 J- J8741.T JP-I 01 P 33 858 892.0 ? 83 2.O 879. f 871( 9 JP-59 pr---- - 854.0 67 ri 0 P 13 ?P 65 z 88 Q 61 - 69 0- 874.0 p?47 _- S -8887 F 14 t-42z 879.7 ? . SCOTT 9O 5 JP-62 f2° "? 887.1 ti vz, t $93.0 m ? 8881 JP-60 „•,,?2• '1. '` - STaTiGl' ?? Jf" I5 :JF T _., 8955 P-46 t G 687 :Q JP -12 892.3 LS, ISD 8260 8513 ,s" ` N 3935 12- JP-41 853.0 eg _ __.-- ti 885.3 -3V r4l 1 899 J 887.0 P 11JP-31 815.7 JP-44?--. 880.4 - -- 8840 : 8300 890.7 8950 -y + .. d n 2t _70 fi J -m JP-19 30 ?? - L of JP 58" 874.0 877.5 \z 882.0 Ia . 8822 11 1% J-p JP- 820.8 e?'.? 8P 3 p LL Di 830.0 879.4 C Mai J -f JP 20 s. E-81 - ?,- ` SQUARE ?... 852.0 ! 1 - ?` z 855.6 J-o J818.41 9 ?? - JP-21 ?s? L$-17 W 8300 815,3 -`2-__ 77 840.0 a \ 3 ,?Pp 8300 36~\ N `titi.-:.34 J-s $5` 4-ATCH- 885'2 F21 : , d 27_ FK oil t JP- i,. JP-8 PAYStCK 684.0JP-53 JP-22 8640 82017 0, 830.E _ACAN B9f.9 -. .. _ ? ?. PARK a ~\? ? ? JP' 29 is ci 88 6.4 8400-...L.S. f l8 tP 63926.0 JP ZE -875.0 945.0 W" I JP=2? -?- 1 113 , a I 8 o4: 2060 4:0 7771 SUBJECT PARCEL O I PUBLIC WORKS DEPART EN MAS"'TER PLAN CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT REM i CF ADDITION APPLICANT: MARK. REM IC LOCATION z EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING- DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED HE PART OF NE`', OF SE N OF SECTION 4 R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DE's F.".F"SBF'FR 19, [985 DECEMBER 12, , 1985 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application h been submitted requesting preliminary a ;)!at °iCl 1_t:1C of - lot- a;_'Y cEiY]tain i_ 1.26 acres. 7._F?_ iL "z c__? ? ''f:' C?? ZONING AND LAND! UHF.,: Presently _ the parcel zoned 1.'" c i,J.rat.i i single district and Gdo,_Ld allow only a C.1x-.1___F' dwelling. 6'.C Comprehensive Guido also designates tO ..O parcel as s a R-1 single .., -- E family district with a dc-? -1 ._ .. 'C y of .. ? .? _' GPI L b -b x; q units per acre, rT ! v .-C'b'J of t,.' particular Ui_ C pCT'f-V , i t is in an area ¢i;.cv3.„ is d eoJE,1o?. at a very low '1°A?:?tv 2 To _ is aF-rr°5. the T'1?•A°t "1 are existing single family homes. To f,it south and °OSr is (-'i+;r park property and ta t; Y the west undeveloped R- 1 zoned ° O f I" L `? ( ° 1.?Y_ Ji?._ It with, °, iiis particular parcel is that -it wa-s created a number of /t=ames 00 without any qo o public access e1 f`j p ro . n la_ C €., C> 'ti"". parcel, Ti ,Ze .Yr: f t,1 C' biggest. << concern City -, L? creating t h i s lot 1 to how be,[- to ,-ov s.-_, 1 access or a street to this particular lot. a?C at outl.t° neighborhood there are a of ,,,tr'°i::s or portions of streets Mich have been dedicated as right-of-way 13 `,r li < 7 not been constructed at this K:'l p., 1 vAl i..;i': 1.a stubbed to the undeveloped pro pert,,,, the, ;<;,itth aric, Ci¢"V easement m:;. _?lE T1 runs easterly which touches the corner W Lhe plat =? nl: _, - E_ o t-ion. Ulm! other road Gv . .. , F:' a May or ma.'; n(t. >.}o at. this time is Skyline Hi-Inc w Presently, ?} v i ne u Drive platted Oil >! a i711 right-of-way up to the west property line of Oster Addition c ,.,i i park property has <3 1 ;"':3;f _ gt , 5, then ? pi C: ? t °_ of- io"( running along tho souther] portion of the park property. The issue is in how to create an overall circulation in t It i neighborh o and `till try to provide public access to the propose t lot. 'There are 3 alternatives that are possible: 1) To require the applicant to plat a half right-of-way along the westerly portion of to parcel and-1, ?a£1 < LE3 it, a right-of-way in order that sLre I connection could be irtadle from ri ai,t`. i Pqo Terrace to Skyline Drive. This would run along he westerly, property line of lot 1, Hein _,. Add fr on , Due to the topography and location of this road engineering, parks and planning viewed this alternate as net being t-he most feasible approach. 1'E: s, :'TINARY ;-."s'_ K ADDITION E.MB ,R 19, 192 P1'vCL, 2 2) prov.. c c it would be no :a , v o lo o: a - t, ti-le ease,,T,ent j s t-d to the ?( City tip. Py- "_-1;. -, c F Tn7!]lcr°1 ? t"loi% u, r0 -v J cl E'-.- TJuh11G access to ?a2E '" e w I ';.` coon CL OC A tI: _ s Part O LOU '_ a ¢_ : TCi: this alternative i s tie he moot teaso,h1 nay to provide access to this pro-pert,". 3) T Ic Lilt 2-.?. tC c,,t ?n concept to provide c i c al:I ce r cu o t . ;r f r o 3 trio 1`1 E'rqor`Go d Is continue HlgYir1G1g ", , cP outs:" to Dr This would be dcr-,e at tl..Ae tiEn.e tl.e Do ,.()-h po c --t± no` _d develop and the comer le_ r_o ouL_e be mC':V1.= a. suture date It appears that t' onoq= f`' , to the pro'l 1t c-s, this connection n._ :rte , t provide a t f.-ture date. This would allow the, pe1 :;tri c_in. circulation fr??r, the north to follow this .--mod a '_i- q n mi (-- ":'0-- and then easter i y to the park. -: - a. r, , `.t-h s 1 H a t i t was not the plat it In r e.n c ? f1t f n.e sr ?u '._ 1 '00 1110;"1 t o an, Nil "fi :Made this difficult ci l y ' and ?,r-tiidc r'' °mT, efl t1005.m -):-GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant did not submit any nrad-ng l.an for Staff review and comment. Staff does not foresee arty „- surmountable problems resulting from grading with thi, rt> ion ,i r:t, how 1 Staff cannot certain without a grading 0200 to Tito :: 1 f is quite we 1 drained because it 001 vs- SIT:a _ knoll'. Drai,?2qo appears to be westerly and c at curly from -1-1m high poi alt located ape roximately at the center o 3f 1_i_ s pars: c l . Because of its adequate drainage and small size, Staff does not anticim_aL,e the need for any storm sewer for thi:?; dovclc,pmcr,t UTILITIES: Sanitary wer and watermain are i. ;»_ace wi --,S High RI,7 e Terrace. ho e mains, when extended, a v- s uf f c i? rlt _. -,-)aci _y and acp , to provide service to thJ_s i -! r. C> (lrienCi Loth moons be extended 5o 1thF`r v to the soot` one Fr! c: 11 I i "'ge mace and then easterly t ` roL,gl1- the tv own -a 5,51 p, rc.el south of lot 1 of Valley View Plat Platoon ±Io. 2. STREIETS: This proposed development has no pubic access to it .? o for this development to comply with the public access C , ser f_ St af f recommends the option of Corti t u :tion of C"U .. oc of. of High ld' e Terraace. This 6c_'uld be a r'" ,. ivolL cur-- e i'.c, apt rea iin.Czt.e L p 1601 long. S CmUre 1 shows the other options that Staff con`; i ae ce, The=, L,-1sks Depui-tnlent feels that the option of loc A ir?g the str('r t: al --ng the pa , r;. would be detrimental to the park prod _r_ fy PRELIMINARY PLAT PLC _ CK: ADDITION DECEMBER 19, `? L 5 PAGE 3 High Ridge Terrrrr A :=; a C , ; y street c- L y owned pa r ce abutts. This dev cpTm'_rt should Provide Lou 1!._ extension t _ and ?;-.(1 ( - r ? ' - ` : High Ridge Te;?"11,CE-' , c?JlOaf... ?-U ' south _ north line of r-i_?ii??_ ?._ ,- 0 1 0 - 7 7 aloe w i t h the ; 1 . > - : 3 l , 1 _ : " ' , , of t it cu L ,__ , RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMENTS: T bt, ()ti,uE ( .:UiC the ci1 ?_.;Ct- :??." construction, the City vv - ; -t_ _ right-of-way l _ -_ require about2400 `?Ch of dedication from the ' u Low ng: 1) SW corner of lot q, H , l a Acres. 2) NW corner of parcel 010- 3) NE ..- corner o': parcel 010-77, The abcw right-of-way will lilt a 551 radius C o 1E1 cul-de-sac, centered about at the N1"i corner of Hits c , C powcc deve Lopm nt f ASSESSMENTS: In researching f1 City's .- _ c np r - records, _ fount that this hi> C'c' JE=lOpiTl('n?= is responsible for trunk ,rEwa ."t ,ri„ sC3N'C_`?- ,;': ICCI:_'tlt:, in , a.Ct..L!Oil, assessment research 1":C! a.1''di t h(, City Oil-Ly I ti . , c ' E S 'U If Tr ?\l at e l y ?. of 1 1 ' ' r iink "Y :_.1 water - assessment back in L-. 7e The 1. .. .,si,?.c:ilt. r,,t.e i; ai_ tire ,.,ss `y 80 , i H. acree a C i t `Y assessed ii C1c0 ; C; : t Cc is ,ar ci The total ..s,. . ;l]i _ should hciv t'ci'I-! $4 8»8l1. To c ; pci, this situation, Staff recommends the r.ll I evel, f Lint C rE_ ;,,, n--- sib1e for the remaining 521 ($478.80-$180+$478.80) of the ":;r: area Watermain rats in effect cE. ,tc t liI'. Ci i_ _ii. t u.._ at r n:°, This WOUIC moue to an additional Ob -._:{ai_Uu'i of $737.80 `th t l has For trunk area ????.! ? ? r . ? ? ? ?_n ? i : . < ? e . , : , ? 1 1 e n 1 _ - < _ The ?>'??,j ;??_ this pC - tion o ,._ h i development for i _r_'..l11' ( area 0-vJ , } 1 S 1 2,635 _ F , 88 uO :i t f :i / ;7 f t , . T L n,1 amounts will r:? based 54 ` The on the areas determined by the final p 0t and the amount of L C of-Way d t':;i +C'? -. 1 and also using the rates in effect d" the _? _ 1I of final platting. PREL a N__''ARY PLAT - RT MIC K F#E,} n :. 'J DECEMBER 19, 19S5 PACE 4 CONDITIONS 1) if alternative number 2 is chosen the cal 1 %- sa:`. shall W-, provided to lot 1, b__oclS. 1 Remick Addition i_,, provide public access. '2) Ai.R - All ?_>t--_e... standard plat additions be 3pp.i.l..,.:1.bl-c to {..hi_. !=iCvE.-'_i.0y)." t.z_'n.L. J i i b 1 '1'.-' a 11i 1 l 1cs a brought I n this .;`' 1C}: I<<''lit Qi C. if i' wC`> i._._ ] T" u, c?d under public c(}u1.ro.:'fi o the project must he a by CoUn .11_ prior to final :11.13 . p> t_;V _ This 1 ;:'w_'tC['TI <.._ _ sL:U. i L require a a C' _ W to provide J._t?qu (`.C'SS and be responsible 1 at I ', 1 11_TIC thp necessary < a IteT1t._ from lot 9, 'n l g viC w Acres and parcel 010-77, Section 4. ` ' j This develclam c'nt 515111 ., n} ; ) for t S i'bL !gat iaa for trunk area sLorii :C'wp . .- ii. nt and the correct amount trunk as-- C,ia CrCl_i1C assessment. MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER; ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, PARKS PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1985 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF REMICK ADDITION Background/Purpose The Planning Commission staff report regarding the Remick Addition references an alternative which places a half R.O.W. along the west 25' of the subject parcel and Highview Park. This alterna- tive, in staff's opinion, is not in the best interest of the park property. Existinq Conditions Highview Park is a neighborhood park with a tot lot, hockey rink, tennis court, softball and open play area. A majority of the site is maintained turf grass. Significant vegetation masses exists within the northeast and southwest portion of the parkland. The topography within the park can be characterized as gently rolling with several large flat areas. The terrain within the potential half R.O.W. is low in the northwest corner of the park with an approximate 10' change in elevation to a 6' high ridge adjacent to Skyline Road. The gradient of slope within this area is approximately 5-15%. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the park is from Skyline Road. The northern one-half of the park service area does not have direct pedestrian access to the park property. Analysis Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning report alternative for road R.O.W. along the western 25' of Lot 1, Block 1, Remick Addition and within Highview Park be denied. SS/j j MEM ?f? i S?U P f 4? ?- -- R-i TREF ri(?L- j - 1 R( ?? •f - ?EHNDER c, WERJtEW PAR MENiOTA 'l L_ Preliminary lot of: REMICK ADDITION, VICINITY MAP E, 51, 1 ?.-.? _ _ f ; _ ornar • !• T y \ Jo An f. OTooN F.•?s,a. aisor 1 J // ?/Ao ?LO K. L W • \ \ sas•ss'rs'w' uaoo--- / (-- - \y ar m. s. er r... •,.s ,r ., .r rn. ..sour„ ra ,r.n of rn wj ri7(S''E ry (F,S[p/Prrba . ,,.? rA to ,ti ? e r 6 ., r® Sevrr rer.r er vM iw mae,r We: var ar . ,a S.cl?an a. I A- I.K aana 0.wsrbor;cn,r a.. a a.,. w<. ne.... ' 5 va® aTN . Si sa4rn • ?.v.roi,.. w ssarr ' M >r2-!I!a ' • ,..rx a .?..? r Mews S .CITY OF PAGAN SUBJECT : PEZONIN AND PRELTMTNARY PLAT W EORWOOD SCHOOL) APPLICANT: _.S-D- 196, TOM SCHWARTZ LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT T c' z i5 A (AGRICULTURAL) DECEMBER 19, 1985 DECEMBER 5K 1985 if O s (C/I ! ._)N a An applicaMon h c,epn submitted rezoning a10 reliminar -r?1t of cUL ll 5 acre (A) d r a 15 a p .. y t g ? ! . a_ __ ,_1w a Pn __ o (public f i e` i l .7cTl 1' >c, oo. site 7-?.,_Y tt?G, -,Ete`1C.,`llt ,? District -1t) School .IJ This site 1s south -i ? of LiC'L_'I ?.'t?i ri ve and it t :'N .maL mile west of Pilot Knob- Road, ZONING AND LAND liEF. he entire site is surrounded W, A zoning f'xcepl for Lhe southeast.-. H. nt which abut._., the Knoln Hill P.D. .tla L ho t?,U. on the nor- t. (?._,, designation). The l00t 011(1 cim. Pipeline EasementC:11 .>c.-. this lac in a , ort,l._<_„t L 1 j:Y a iic (-L-r c>n on ti.c northern portion of the - site. The _:H has - i T_C il111 { j.nr);?C;r phy but generally flow,---, -.?l< ? high point in t ho a0h From to the north H ; t „nog} Dr I vc). All proposed _ ro x i_no a p p e a r s s flu id and 1 is within the o o, -', linC. s ?c"uC 1 lOt1t7 she NW corner of L he site. A o=-ad . tiq ,_ ci s ,.'hlT_. wi i_ be ? required CODE COMPLIANCE/SITE 1'TEANN I NC : 'n^building meets all :o'_ requ h r- . c t _ . in terms of coverage and _ c._ 0 ;1 t_.'; r, . 72 > t a`t _ . i I H stalls parking @ `! x ) t ) s 1 c ' provided v,T _ t . h the :(J V F at 30 E m 7 . should _ CC I!li`- xt -' auto and bus movement The drop off/stacking area for busses will be approximately 210' Long, 7 vtU4t_o stalls 9E 01 are provided by Lh`=, main °? nF r ., All rosin and c,_ T?. ,.S ..-cam 'G??'J i[?111 ?- i o..e etk -;cr _t_-1,aremle,tse The single access point will be frog:; Deerwood Drive. A fOPe_ . i° _i_On trail nJi 1 be 310. 1 ed from r rwood through she playground/play The lighted Fields area to the schom . ,pry drive will be 32' allowing overflow 0 ,r I1 C7 for nigh-IL activities. The school wi ll .11,01 11110009 tE 1711 1 , i 1 1111 _ l y 700 students h Yl t (1,? _ grades K-5. ?As ?? tlieV, School t ? 1ts _ ? ? ;?azI ? son, ? '?'Jorit._ was ba ao.c- r 00- ; 5 r but currently has 1039 stint °r ..- a The Police -'De-parr-mcrit expressed concern tn. LhC aa- .c.c:,? ve}a c u , ar,i7 to (jot . _ - . . sides of the building. 711u, grades are gentle enoug"-, 012 automobile n :t3 able to ; 01.'1 the grassed area with no drive problem 11:' the curb has b een 'ma'r. . se b REZONLCG & PRELIMINARY PLAT (DEERWOOD SCHOOL) DECL_ . 'R 19, 1985 PAGE 2 COMMENTS: This area of the City is one of the largest c?„ in< undeveloped/platted areas and therefore issues such u,::: hevc np ment and the prop::•sr, Thomas Lake Road extent_ ;n li<,, ? not } l`-; fully addressed as of yet. This project along with the -nr vo- ments on Deerwood k r hedu led for 1986), may `,pt? development in this area and fui. Hhcr scussion of these items may ,, < ded in the near future. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading proposed by this developmenL appears feasible. All grades are within City Code requirements. The grading limits indicate slope easements h . ec. required t= the adjacent propert / east of this site. Staff r City require either written permission or slope easements rm , the vu _, l _: Lp property owner as a condition to final plat approval. Staff LJMs not antrcipate any problem because Lho property owner is the same person \; ho sold this site to t'F_ sc eoi Jis t u a The City and Williams Brothers Pipeline have existing mains rut;=ilno through this proposed site. With the exception of the extreme northeast corner of this site, all grading over the City's e i s t i_nq utilities Williams Brothers Pipeline appear to e acceptable. and W1i? Staff recommends thr. City require written authorization from Williams Brothers allowing the grading within their easement. The cuts and fills within this easement vary a=rc one to rive; feet so Staff does not believe Williams Brothers should have a problem with this grading. However, the City has a 36" reinforced concrete storm sewer pipe along the easterly 400 feet of this development. This grading plan proposes to tin yreiimi is grades the City's consulting engineering firm proposes for e r ,ood Drive. These grades propose on filling Deer,J od Pri =c_ at this location up to 12 feet. The problem resulting Lyric this filling activity is that approximately 100 feet of the 36" RCP ,,.."=t..Ut sewer pipe is Class Ill. In reviewing the amount of fill that one can place over this type of pipe, Staff ¢E_ct the t fi.na of up to 12 feet will exceed the bearing capacity of this pipe. However, there are two alternatives that the City can pursue , -- to mitigate any potential problems. One w<-.)u-id be my t 100 feet of Class III pipe with Class V pipe. The other .- ct. , would be to construct what is ca.L eC_ ?.n _IITi; ? " ?? tec t ?. _ r_ 1c y,.-<_ _ trench". This type of construction will rOd the stress on this pipe. Because the developer (School District 196) already petitioned for Deerwood Drive upgradinq, the City's consulting engineer will undoubtedly look into this si tun. ion and suggest the appropriate measures to mitic,,-.,te any potential problems regarding the filling over this Class III pipe. This site is located within major drainago Astrict B as indicated on figure, U. As Lou can see, the tru it stcrL, sewer servio_nr this area is in pl en all the way to the M.inne:rote River, . a result, no trunk storm sewer construction will be ,-:ecesso ry _r: _r a, PLAT (DEERWOOD SCHOOL) MCI tfly,' ,. 19, 1985 PAGE 3 L , «F A The City has as already ordered ... feasibility report ` r s,_-c. l.., < .z, the _1301 . :.,. ? Lsi the School District (3001 i xOusl , 1__ .._._t 's consulting engineers completed Me feasibility repumt r-,a. - 'r- ._. -..i street , ?,` °_.?.E???ee _L.i?:?„< and " 0I t° xp__Ca`ye?te_ _ ?' t (Project Council received this report on December 3rd and scheduled a public hearing for ja11 uFY y 1, 1986. This s project will provide for w:at c __1t.a iLi within Deer wood Drive be extending the existing t E,S_?l Riverton Avenue _CrG t °"cic? __ near to _?? into the existing woo c ma_L -. at Pilot Knob Road. This is a trunk 4? Lew,r..1.. ,:"! will provide adequate 6 pressure -1n capacity for this ::F ., _-aG r,..e....,.. An 00 q trunk sanitary sewer near the southeast corner of -proposed development is adequate & sewer3c_' Z{`t'_n Because of the proximity of +.x.15 sanitary sewer main, ¢;.: develop- ment Tt:?.'i11; will not have ' ? to construct r2Ti1% lateral sanitary sewer to obtain the e necessary sanitary sewer service, _ surfaced ,?1: .mo Jr_ SF'Ii _ STREETS: JC `:.IW ,L.i DYa. en __ .- c? is an 000 sIi ° ,.CT :('?o gravel __:, ??ti_- _ roadway that adjacent to the 'i(?rth _..-s boundary of the proposed 9 development. Project 450 will _`O for he on "` {. _i_nq of 13 .0r e ood Drive City -,O . '(9l-.?- street status. This includes an 8' bituminous ziLw< _ C12i the south side _at'ld a 5 Eoot concrete walkway on the north side. -! t_e efor'?f this development will be responsible on for the costs associated with an 8' bituminous I _A -ii_ w: 1! .J11.{ its frontage on Deerwood Drive ? this development dedicate t??fr ? recommends ate r ' Y_ - this development In-oposes to c'7'7 -ucf west of their entrance drive _...on, u e CI,o{_. Drive to -.CiOL:1 south boundary. will be responsible for dedicating easements no per City Code. - ,S{1 C`iP_?aE ?c=`rIitE_'ii.t shall be responsible for +_ed,_ )-11g a 50,' right-of-way too i.;eE wo.,;.1 Drive. A S sM1_N 1 3 : PI' t o 455 provides o C r l i.: and street 1 9001 ('__ -, ?n^1lt„ V?)':_ L?; ?ilric?d I r 1t7C a iilt :?i t y ? osE ct all )r_l< (ipYd-'E]q assess- ments l -sri y„-tipICL f ? n`t_ C3 y. single family/agricultural i?.-.a_ ?.?-1 _ ??_?: - ? pr'Q_ -zoning classifications. When these undeveloped properties do develop to choir 1111 ---10 re 30111 _ iL 1 0 viVil City 1,0 c'qu1rr's that thE are LC',l9011. le for the 4 E1 i'1 _.i<`E' ?°?r?' developments r 't'' C' -ti the r t L' assessed at 10 .111 v(. np 1 _.'11.114 and the proposed aped Zoning 10to . The r0! . w1nq 19k i, : umma 1?aS L'1 dI r 1 ( cT_":C.L_ between - 85 `ron nq 3>>: E ,.s_ and tFZ^ Single 1 _tlliLy 7gr r cU7l,ul":,1 zoning rates, 111'),) rates 111 This table also includes assessments for ! c <'" ._ I_ -i1i_ i 1l_ a L _ 1. .- s1 y sewer and 4< °,C be11of LL 1-Yntil tYt'_T:l. SLO> IT'( 7i VCrn t run}: SaLi L The asst siCl'2n1_ arras and 1 ) l's are shnwn on figure 2v E70:ilNG PRELIMINARY PLAT (' EERcuO3D SCHOOL) DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGL 4 Assessment Summary Table L.,T'd 198, De -c° ri- t on Quantity Rates Amount Trunk,Area co , - 15.17 Ac $1,830/Ac $27,761, Trunk Area Storm* 660,800 S.F. $0.024;'S°Fa $1536,D La"'1 Tenefit from* 430 F.F. $7.695// .F.. $3,309 Trunk Water Street * 4 30 F.F. $ 4 2 , J 0 . F . $18,40 I'r iiway* 430 F.F. $11.36 'p. $4,82--,,, Lat'l Benefit from 160 F.F. $l4,3413/J, *2,29'i Trun], Sanitary Lat' l i. gilt from 500 F.F. $9 80/F.F. $4,90.'--, Trunk Storm ^-- OTAi, $77,491 Upgrading from singl e family/agriculture rate to c ._,rnn, . / ind. rate. Staff rccnr mcnd.s the developer execute a Waiver of Plat to include the above assessment upgrading and lat eral benefits to Pro , e; ,- 455 as a co l?ci i t c,;, of final plat approval. The costs fox t h e installation of the water.tiaLn, . j n tart, service, storm Fewer laterals, parking lots and st [CCi construc- tion with N * this development will be the sole res ponsi}d i ty of this development. -. , REZONING `s PRELIMINARY i?r,_? (,)r ?. w'00D SCHOOL) DECEMBER 9 r 198 PAGE -' CONDITIONS: 1) The C1Vy A1-1 i CS L!1 e written ' pa iii on for ;-!Ui)c t nFrn..'I1[ from LCaC 1St '1" 1''T+"'ticr-L - owner, 2 __ - - ?3 - i City will C. uf-l oY-_T a( ?;_lT:i or ?'s.:i1C'I1L from isI??' N !- 1 1 amS Brothers Pipeline for grad mg 4cii_ ;I.7II h William T:;uo (1 ap t ca IIC1"7 : 3) If this 14'vc 1oF;jIII:'lit: can'vc. Cab 37;' the necessary slope t .s1 .e from the ` G? , ` '' I y a: ; cd(`,11 t (.) r 1 ' e_' I this a J`, will ., responsible for (Ii _ t ru is L he nc I r t i r1t, wills i conform to tho ` ) Project - be prior Hholl 5) This Cic' _I-C;j)m i'' shall de ic'"3.t'C' a i half ? 1 qf1. I -wa- for 11cc': w( Cr_ Drive, 6) This deve1I ' `1C'Ilr-. 11al - C{('C ,C c l 1i 1 tic' i1c'!1 `v('r- ?11 .'? lli.; .t.; :1i11 ?3C'1 C,1..' 1 IYc `, , _ 01 1 11 L_. site, 7) This C%i _ 1C'J.111_;lt shalt 111L:`1 i Illt; U '_C c Y' `9 t;: include ,pC I :3_'.IiCj of assessments from he single < 1 y a C)rZ.." .4 i C. L:_1.. 11 ,.t' r -?t_- .. t_ co ._ vTTi?ill'l:,i'. i ,_L, L?l,Wl,.=? r L?:I 1r?t ?_ t be ..ci <,__ i with 11 C c_c 455. 8 This ,:i.fvoiC%".T;lcTC shall ;,)(_' responsible f or 3 I C ._ lw1V 1l`.IIC{ a,eE„rw;_)c1!,t `'t: i-<C, the i`GE f=. of 4tifi .C°h .11 ,!_ t:?r_ 111.1 tC ;? 1 ._ the cYd7_C ,r.. c r Project 455, .:kE \ lt:.ir"?lC:TlC shall be responsible tor lateral rCSlt=rt_11- 9) This from ( r 11,'"1 11 sanitary III i _ r l I I t C I11 sower -ir t h e ,- L c s 1.11 effect at the time of the public t I , f r- rU ect. `)_i a _ development shall be r e_,[)..S? -_S?1 {'; all costs assC)C 1_?I'Ci 10) This for _ with C?at C'1 ; i ' _ , i L f .1 i 1 T 1 ; t 4 . ` E wc'I ' L c ' ' ' ' t : LOYii' newcn St ' and parking W L f_ construction 1; a_ t}l I_ I1 = t 1_ t E' . Ali ACKHAWK HILLS RQ 3 1 zJy u c a FBPE DEPT ADM COMM. ROOM---d??, "LARK g RARY oo AKflTI _. p i 0 EST AVF F%RRY Rd }o } FLAY ROAD .. "EMSON ?RiE W,QC" f j LAAL ?1 Ci oyW 4 R N S2 E [CH 8 N ?I eAx ? ? a? PQVq WA _ VfR?"R--4,ES T is \\?i / 5" rfl?- Ir•Y eA?1 mM1?r.? 'A 1, ...., ..? ,, E KT Y _ 7 r SCNooL IN ,.? .,, . EAGAN . ...w< v _ __...,? ,_. J!? ? ? `` cave _ -. 3 9, 1f ? `?? _- / ?•e _? •? _ r Y' v ; ? . f p w?c:". -- \ v et - t I .1 _g i i° _ ! - a+a e gg f a s F"t %1? a' e' a` ? 1 ? va ?+ - a, ? ? _'s ' a ??Bac .isaots .:a.? .. ----=• _ .......,® _ - ..:>-.?a -: -_.t?t. \J?? t.' ;? ? ? ? ? a .... ? ? v.r t.ar :w or a.?.. w. as >.. ®t .. o: ser-». E . ri, ?ci °-° B 4 . .., .. . , . .: _-,y-'".- _..-- } ?t ®.. .• ? -r'-c i 9v Ck 4b-4 ft- j+ {°' „? ? °`e, ` ,3; +?,1d''1' y° ? t ? . ? f`p °e , 'rr . t> tt'•t \C I'9'ltraii ? ? X ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?e g '1 ° Y RR a. \ . 1 ! f 1' aa'' ? P S I `I1 . f f JI _ ..t C --------- xt P °°1 t; r yl° e = lit .. i ? ' ',? ?` , ? :°•, ., to , . t.. f 1 ?l9 ( 9.O •_ y igxtyg 3l 4x® fit r r? x pi, _ ' i 6«sr '' t ! t w S irr+ .\ A° T? 1 Pa 7! tx, r k' I,r °` t{. ttr?$r? gEr?' ? P t `4 ?J ', °` >`_ ...??°°? P .?.Ai °" °?t' •8 tiiii ? 3? ^t® .? 14 ?, i,: ? ? . _j r<r•-?'"7-^ Ili r ? • ? A- ? t a.v? ?? - ?i 1 !' • J! Jt' ® R LATERAL BENEFIT # ? tt2• ey ¢:e!; n P'+1 FIG. 2 C ?' L? # ? ctt gg ] 'rya '?4, 3 i - DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION ? tF tivF1 TON ^??a r4 AP= !'66 36 A-^ 2 t A-s 886.0 835.2 ..,.? ANOALF l '.P BP-35 SUBJECT PARCEL L .... --,- j city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS o c EPARTME J t .I, 830.0 EA' EA P4 LP-43 851.1 853.8 CITY OF EAC ' N SUBJECT: r REL INTNATIY PLAT (SIlVOP BELL 1) APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOP MEN£T' COMPANY LoCra m'1 N: SE% OF SECTION 18 --( i (.. !t.-T Tfe IF4 EXISTING ZONING: -?1? (?,if??42T iNg DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING- DECFMRHR '-[q' DATE OF REr"'C:.`i`-- DECEMBER 9 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING AND PLANNTNG DEPARTMENTS APPI t_`A` [ #N: An cit ' l _c '. win has been submitted for 1 C):= _ i a'. plat (0]. Ts ng of a 102,200 s('f Mice Cl i8.3 acres or in the SEW n Section i??:i 1v a ZONING - - IN1.., ? AND -? tsr'? ,.;?.,? USE;: 1'_-..? e_,-_Y.. ___7 loc?.ic., nn t_,ic' _,lit'.i 1l_'Y «. o- the Sijvpr Bell loop is surrounded by Li zoninq emccq)t for tAie it--4 i UartTn e a_=; to the west. The hut .x_1[10 wit o tr t toll a 1 ro ,.. to W q_.i similar t_? the RPig , Johnson office warehouse along l CjIlw<aa% Wand `d„io r,e Uc)od'. 3 co id m 0 i- V Code permits I - i Ca 1 n9 C'ov_ iC;(-, of 352 in Ll distracts and tlto app] Want, .:Clr, is l L;"1Cf i;fl) Y xiii1a p- 280280, 3/' s..J ; parking stalls f3 9' y* 20' ..r_ ,.i=mvi1 a This _L-:-> .:., r a_- i_<.) of !` s q i 1 CS'ros building area A L_l L'L!a 1 ['_''w 3_;101 ar;C-_no setbacks meet .,'Cfte o1"!pli-<i1cC' requirements except 0" the L)2er}ice: Lj setback 1_-c :q the H _ F}. way ' poop C'Y't.`y' line. The L;)_ hnnitte_'d sito a 10' setback where ,:i 20' 0; u u- t_ vida r, ti' C 1 1. ` ;" F ar i-? ,0 needed, ? 1 T the `, 7 ._ill . however t'it ti? should - n - clue O i t .-Y.. jf:' Highway 13 right-of-way. in that area, the t is 000G _ i _ lower i , 3n t ' , " ' . _ right-of-way. 1 .. southern most point thc, parking is 10' below In E r1:S 2 t-`Jr_ .ti.rys some of re"Laining oval l- o%1_ 1. the r_ a E,(n Ttl wall area i- need to be furt.her reviewed at the t ^.a I plat I Y_ 1 a'_.' in terms of ., 00_ 1 i! =( and ho f inc- qT:(_. ex_7 sf. _!i]'y topography %> low ,1 E, c'. Y L 1..<'_ ,-. C, ,?i_., _?_ of ?, II C' c'_t?.P i..t..... , i9??1JI 0;?'? '1 d feet of Ei; ?i will be needed, to meet the pzoposE?C %')UI elevation. d, high c [ .'a a't C)':1C Li7c_. IN CT C i <.ii. of He sitc W ! . . _ provide most or 0 0 0 1i- :-. _- d 011 Tim im app 1 1 e ' m.. proposes to grade outside the property line to the south but Ci-1 isle to have 111c11 Permission SITE P_[IANNI.NG The hie1ICl 011 itself will in-01-00 the shape o- 1_ he site ana there e r i l 1 be a access points f rom Silv er Bell R o a d . 11-.., access e:, t to the west will ' c?s,: rii:`v-em^r.t I°;+. c; the ,??te Kor loading clock _ a as This ,;Fn'a appears 1.a,,(,c enough Pr -_-L PLAT _ SILVER DELL I DECEMBER 19, 19°- a 1 r '3y ht0? `I r- I `-'C cLj Lrucks The interior road CIE Fr r L , b -i a- arL?i_ is tde 173 me t_, .; L,, i?t , l { it (n els2E. frec,2noving auto ubL1C' cir.c.i]R..-011F , W _Cia! 1 ;II L a° length par}_l_ lC stalls. 20 separate entries will TO . i into the cedar and rock faced bloc;" building This should eliminate any paT 177.7 CC1]qc'SC _ OI7 in a particular portion of the I ! _ o The C !, r c'..t '1r _}'. was chosen to help softer the 11i1_cl Tlg "Ll;'1!, r-sr , Qv nq `, w '" _1 y2 awG: a PLo7 c compatible f. e? r?Ty7?_t `rd1 tax C1 E? q T u1 L1 In- berried to Inc w 1 :t`1" t,1 rl5s ,w =1 Ur n;_ _ .r,',-nv_io... ,.'I !_ i UP available for review K nc ,csi_ The C L landscape a pol-icy will require so r:''< 'il n and ` o ti L`iq of the parkiop areas from the public street. The Anal landscape plan will ,: 1,equired at the final plat st s ; ,t 1 _ - 1..b: sot ?-"et to the ra ks Dedication fee of .04 per sq t o GRADING/DRAINAGE: 10 p aQ'co plan the TO\ E'aOwe`-. UCnij Lo;'r -- as_ W l_O; e7-iL ,ap - s f. ^ ,n Lar _p ;reviz-CI L.a h1 •_ d. a30 I p._ i_;: !:1ti, p he _' c.t.,r I t??1 of il:a Own: al '_)a C'. E`. D l 'i^ to C? a-._ or his Property. Parcel 011"'02 is ioc t . cc ..ou L ,. C' -, i „l r`_ -5 Old Silver Bell .?? ui,,_J5S .(i:L used to -nn.. lL ?i c:cJF',c"ip Cannon obtain the fission of the r ro nv , n " of 011 °•0-?2 t. 'n e1,e, ve reLG z _irlg wall construction is _ _ _ in nVJe Fx.11 -`St corner o; to] , OfrC ui,sed r. ev lt--? ... 'h- ,ri - 1, thL s t, e'PI 0_. 1P-T1 (Old i11't Sol] NrW i"! ETC ve`c; th- :'Suth "n" Of _. ,1 v, L1 CY LO) to 14' oS c.c = - J LL, _. tp, q c ,.- e T1n ;. l- \'wlC. _ it' in fill up to 41 Over th . is;-in-1 OL'I1 c' L` _ 1 G71 leeQ ?_ `fl this grading . :I?.t war"rnpin LC ca._ -d along the southerly boundary t h _. u" - '.'!U I "i.- t ?.A (,,L Road). The developer will have in) -plocate .-L, _;O n E mdLll to _."C7V < Me ;.its l a°_ u -- z"_c@ - to r -e`E'eW ee Ci The W;ATPR 1ALN par rc' will 11trIp more TIP- Jouatic'-'? development i -s tr.- .? ??r _.,.?,? A. This : .p .ec_?IeIoF;1?-_ r. within m major drainage C,._ 1_tri??? c _ _en ;-prop _e to connect to an existing 3G storm s er Mn Dot buj-lt- -i r- they :1 -rrr E C'. Silver Bell Road with re 1 d - 'tilr w'a _ Staff recommends storm sewer be made available parcel 01.1--0 T I will require the major storm sewer line -o clp around, the 1 uA .ul ..io }_ h h Tni a 13 right-of-way then ;mil i 1o LC:o _t to r Parcel 011-02. 02. 1'ho grades and sizes of L he storm sewer ,1155 , Sc' cihF_quIat'_. '`_.,n suit the needs of parcel 0ll-024 n'hi]_:, development may petition the C',- ' for installation of this sE_,rrll-' 1i e so Lh the City can assess each property their proportionate ;haC<. of he cost, OthcrG+ ise this development wilt, i r ( 0000 i5; to Lo r the installation of this U1'. and in Gv ;r-li 1.I1C %TiLh the owner -f parcel 011-02 for any cost participation from them. ovj the applicant jet ides the grading pia n to '-he final p W approval, this plan shall include the proposed r 11 =1 01] 5011' 011-02. I 'IL ! IM-I Nr' R PLAT -- SILVER E i DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 3; UTILITIES: Because of the extensive grading U. _. r the ._. < 1 OIi J_ 4 C'Yr1 _JLr'Ci7.?d(_? located within INC 01a 101a Silver Bell Road ?- the ,?7p roadway the developer will have to relocate ana urbury about n 450' of v." .Ja ma zn .Even _ho, -u1 tii i,_, 1 ._ ; tC ina i 1 '7e oESA- service _ - ,I I o the a pa. "J- men t n and ,.- _ ,> - - -- ? .-'t c-:, west of 1 r. vr_-? 1 op - -? lter?tr tY1 not .,,d , , ?iCI _[_F? C'_ r " ' L[i: ti : a rS1.E' II'a .,hut; `I,o\rv`I C1 :_ r i n n- 7I1 t _:n!' c W make the two connections. There would be minimal 11x impact r on the apartments and residents westof this _._ vC;1Czi1L7i2i1tm dl I1 1-t; i- record plans, this rc-aliqneni: will require the 3' e l o at1 o n of one hydrant. % Wo ? S t - t aS i .- a the !lort'1C ast corner of ? hi proposed de `=Lo ilen- r- i c, _- fire protection T11 so ,x.121 ?- . 'c,_1? 1 ? sc. tJ°r So J LcC' this de\rF, 1oj?;Tlr`nt proposes r'ot COI`t ;t'`L'c,tLrlC; will tie into the Pxistinq sanitary sewo 1 i.',I of ` i Lver Bell Road, St_a Cf will cF'v cw these items again U,JOX;r this development,:-; submission of final construction CItc:N for 0 -NLC-s„ STREETS: sii 'ar null Road is are ei I ;titTq `it"" ." _ lector t rc,_.a- w.1 ch borders i.`-' proposed development 11 i1C7 its westerly y c?-1Q I C ii y boundaries, 9' A 13 to (INI i CAe C r eas c i=)i boundary however no access can be obtained because Dot r .? has access control 1%Fi 1 'C '.t LCiY1 .rlil1.1C7L:i' this _ iC,h -C't 4ay This development is » I' o> C_• . _.:- h Cj four 1 Y1 qr r - .-. S/eC-; t-" sS points on i ; J Silver Heil Road, The two '_-IOYI u,_sW? ;y acicss 1,1'1_, appear t i ,_U]_C,, X11_ . would like to o _1C ,- 1 Y rr.j_.t 4C.- cr_ access ) i n line li - -a .1_ LLng it 1 vetn%< :s to the c-lp.1_ c1 Lr- 1,- f o.u1 t _C w.west Of this development before making any recommendations, ? Because 01 tile ;ia-e iST an^e - it Sc' ` elope carefully select landscaping mate ' i 1_L - r t- I the 3 (I , e<? Tl 7....d1 , , UC -6J-E ?c n t L IIl'- two accesses on H C d hi - - proper site distance, -0 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: M Dot Hi ai nc'it tit right-of-way for Silver Is !] 1PoiS with the skate 1',H relocation right-ot-way dedicaLdon is necessary. This over ..- development will have relocated t he wute-main this development pment to dedicate and any n will have a .';i' U I._ L_! t 1 y y ewly constructed to dic , C 0 F a: C'Hr>, . litr?r 1- utility , semen over the public storm SE-.l,' ._ line. PRET.1MMAR PLAT - ,Slav Et, BELL I DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 4 ASSESSMENT: The City's assessment recorj' indicate this d v ;p- mcr_ is still res ponsible for trunk area storm .?a< and lateral, benefit from trunk _ - sanitary sewer. The estimated r tirr s and amounts arc shown on the f ollowing table: As ssessmnnt Summary Table Refer to Figure 2) Est'd 1985 Description Quantity Date Aa1 ota n Trunk Area Storm 361,550 S.F. $0.072/S.F. $26,031 Sewer Lat'l Benefit from 300 F.F. $14.345/F.F, 4p 01 Trunk Sanitary TOTAL $30,335 The final assessm ent amounts will be based upon the rates in effect or the time of final platting. This development shall be responsible for all costs associatea with the relocati on of the trunk watermain, all private _storm sewer construction, sanitary sewer service construct: '_ o and restora- tion and its s!1U- uof the public storm sewer. However, if this development propos es to install the public storm sewer privately, then it will have to be responsible for all costs of construction of this system. L P.< ,K„ M T1A1 V PLAT Sll_v'F?il BELDECEMBER 19, 1985 _ COND C`I'IONS i The in c'1 ' dCYL,'O p_ c3,; ..t.al ;_ 1 , d1C e pI Cii) `t'Q q=a...A'1: C? lt._1'C'A u Ly ? _ ? ? -'1 - on ? 1 ??,? C? with ,r - ? t= L_;v'il permission from Q n. n_ property owner to grade on his 2' The also indicate " ? ( l."1:1! grading . ?'.:7 plan a1? shall i .? ? the I .L,C _? m retaining wall along he T. H. I_I right-of-way. 3) Al , ?> C.?_t? i ? a1 v,i;CCl pipe UerMs diLj appurtenances shall r _ 1un ) r the property of the A y of Eagan and d stockpiled as C" ° qL1 £' by the City. 4? This development shall be 1 °E't p+,Ilst., Lh for the _ olGC: laCi «.:'U '- o`t, "-yu c- f_t'A, ._ " I r u t I. 97 d t r n r =? <- . ii e _, t11 t _?I '1 in ?? C " C , O1 (. C u approved I Qn> b he "_t` of Eagan. 5) 011-02 ?"?"1I:s development shall i??-' Oti-LdE' .z storm sewer C?Lip" lTL Q) par col, and the plans i s Hi ., the storm c < pL, , by the City of Eagan. ) T'. driveway accesses u n : j h westerly portion of t h i s development shall line up whore_ appropriate, with x,-111 accesses along he wE _t,O l f- side of Silver Bell Roa& ?. 7) This development shall be responsible for !oG'_C.ct111q csl -'0t casement over the 12" w:3t-erma relocation alto a A. casement over the public storm sewer. This development . trunk area storm ?;?1_ti_?_ be responsible For sewer assessments rilld lateral 1-':'.I1C::1 1t C."r)i'"t trunk sanitary Lim(_---, r 9) This developer assumes all responsibility for costs associated with this development including ' l trunk lot ..,'.1n relocation, and this development's share of public storm `-ewes if the storm sewer is installed under City Contract. 10) Ali y exterior sides s of di-.he r:).1a aJ_n? f require the same architectur- -? al treatment, 11) Proof OerH,t_O5_on to goodie adjacent property. 12) i variance of 10" for parking 1"' provided on the sollt to "3 ;r' portion. 13) All parking areas to be ? ber_meu and suitably _ l,1I.dsc°pC'da a?UE ,\ 1 I z?' ? e FRS ! ?'' _ '? ?L ao??cror+q C \ -+° ?L raca?J QUEST( TR. J 1` ?gj` r ? _ri tT± H GAN 77-7 I( NB ??af a a S y B-2? r . sa e -i:y F a is i J DATA i1 SILVER BELL 1 C7 6p _ 769.4 A-c cl? INOUST4?IAL), \ 7 Q 7 A b P1 /f 4?? 806.0 AP 2? pp . 796 3 s. .. .. _.? _ - It7 A l 802.4 - r, d ' j A-bbb A-ij AP-39,- A-kk F ???a n AP-38 /I 83948 696.3 A hh 841. T036?c _ a ?r = i a?44? -t, rF/ - 5 r ?yyGAN MEI 816 $7Efv /=.'N ?? _fL BfB_8 3 V E? F V 387 ? t AP r f L4r: ?i \lga Ct-A - b 7-3 I < r ? 856 ? ? _ (? _ 8663 GlI { rA-o A, uaa vat _ANC } . / A _ .f Mffg t fif ??I SUBJECT PARCEL G it } - Ia 6! 'LU 07 w ) iQ??g tiY Ya 'Fir 1 Ad, Rec U 6, 6 id ® F m 3 L !?C! j j Atj 6rac. `"F 'vtt 1 Lit' ?u,iJtU d ttdut tilLAit. S..) f ATE HJILDING/ UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC. & -3IGN/ LOCATION ACQUISITION PREP :. ION EQUIPMENT 3?" TFP.S LIGHTING PARKING LANDSCAPING F', ?'I 3i0, TOTALS YF1!"S _I,__ _-LS 3,000 5,000 5,000 $13,0,') C: )N 5,000 10,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 1,003 $27,070) F 2 25,000 25,000 10,00 3,000 30,000 10,000 5,000 __ _---$108,000 RAM 1 50,000 80,000 46,000 105,000 50,000 15,000 10,000 $356,000 CEDAR PARK 12,0}0 10,000 3,500 6,00 3,000 $34,500 -- ---- CARNELSAN 37»'±00_ 16,000 -`30,000 15,000 5,000 _,_ PERI1X7T PATH 20,0 20,000 .,000 $43,000 WOODHAVEN 5,000 15,000 30,000 20,000 3,000 $76, 10 BLACKHAWK PARK 540,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 25,000 125,000 25,000 t-.,090,0 03ARRY (COACHMAN) 80,000 83,000 30,0)0 25,000 20,000 15,000 007 $273,000 PILOT KNOB 40,000 60,E 30,000 20,000 8,000 8,000 '.) $181.0X7 HIGHVIEW x,0700 3,070 20,000 8,000 --- C. HOME „0001 10,000 3,000 10,000 8,000 ,000 $39,000 MOONSHINE 100,000 0,000 40,000 50,000 15,000 40,000 20,000 27,000 X365,004 LEXINGTON 15,000 10,000 30,000 5,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 $68,000 BURR OAKS 200,000 80,000 55,000 15,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 $420,000 0' L.EARY 45,000 88,000 55,000 15,000 15,000 97,000 22,CKx) 25,000 $362,000 FISH LAKE 5'txX) 10,0 ___ __.__15'000_.._ 5,000 ... 3,000 ... 1a, ? , -m, 000, WESCOTT STATION 100,000 50,00} 50,000 25,000 30,000 25,000 ;),00 $310,000 BERRY PATH 5,000 3,000 $8,000 PAT EAGAN 150,000 ?.,00D $185,000 KENE HOUSE 70,000 30,000 $100,000 NORTTMEW 50,000 80,070 60,000 130,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 $445,000 __ __ -C LAKE _____-10,000 115,000 _ --- 1,000 10,000 15,:? ,,, °- $54,000 OAK CHASE 10,000 8,000 2,000 1,500 5,000 ',000 $27,500 WELL SITE 10,000 25,000 25,000 10,000 _10 $80,000 RAVINE ?;,300 $5,000 GOAT HILL-CAPRICORN 95,000 100,000 50,000 120,000 81,000 10,000 28,0 0 $484,000 WALNUT HILL 68,000 60,000 15,000 12,000 30,000 5,000 $199,000 -__.-_..SCHWANZ LAKE ?? 5.000"'. _? 100, 00,000 180,030 .. _ 75,000 75,0x7 --- 30,0 ", 5;0,000 SCHWANZ LAKE PJYJON $5,000 LAKESIDE 30,000 12,000 11,000 7,000 10,000 1u,1._ 7 580,E EVERGREEN 18,007 18,001 2,00 5,000 8,00.' 2,000 $53,070 THOMAS LAKE 200,000 50,000 25,000 $275,000 RILX)ECLIFF 20,000 60,000 30,000 25,000 80,007 25,000 10,E $250,000 WALDEN HEIGHTS 80, OCCr- -----50, 000 -_._60,000 _ __ ___ ._ _ _ 5,(M _ _.10, 000 __ -_-15, 000 2 , 0 245, W0 WINKLER/JACKSC_ 40,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 7,00( G100,0xi ME..ABOWLAND 60,000 30,000 2,000 10,000 15,00 10,000 $127,000 BC/BS .:: 25,(X10 ----W:-100,000 80,400 30,E 35,000 30,0x10 15,0 00 25,(000 0 0 $ 340,0 TRAILS RAILS 0 00 80,WV y } ? $80,000 HEINE POND 50,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 1,000 20,000 8,000 5,000 $119,000 SOUTH AK.)°"""`"° -25 ODD '20 ,000? ._-?-?_,1pJr000 _ -,e 3, DOC) TJ,000 5,??, WINDCREST 80,000 20,000 $100,000 ATHLETIC SITE #3 50,00X7 150,000 25,007 $625,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #14 80,000 50,000 50,000 20,000 20,U',) 0220 ,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION l{28 100,000 100,000 50,007 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 $390,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #21 120,000 $120,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 18 ___ __ NEIGHBOMOD PARK SECTION 31E 80,050 50,000 50,000 5,DDO 20,000 20,000 $225,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 24 100,000 $100,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 36W 84,000 $80,000 _ NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 34 80,001 $80,0 "TIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 23 80,000 $80,000 CENTER COMPLEX - __ - $40,000 TOTALS $2,730,000 $1,824,003 $1,517,010 $981,000 $754,000 $1,120,007 $577,0 $618,500 $10,121,507 0 PARK PROJECTS: i985 TE JILDING/ UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC, & DESIGN/ ,OCATION n e - • • :, c 'IRS LIGHTING PARKING LAN f ^.',^ S RIVER HIL[ S CINNMIDN RAHN 2 RAHN 1 52,500 50,000 IT/ CEDAR PARK SAN PE'IDOT PATH WOODHAVEN 15,`O0 BLACKHAWK PARK QUARRY (COACHMAN) PILOT KNOB HIGHVIEW C. FAME 10,000 NSHINE LEXINGTON BURR OAKS .0`.. LEARY.__ FISH LAKE J,O00 5,000 25,000 WE SCOTT STATION BERRY PATH PAT EAGAN $0 KEHNE HOUSE 35,000 $35,000 NORTHVIEW CARL ON LAKE OAK CHASE 8,000 1,500 uCG WELL SITE RAVINE GOAT HILL-CAPRICORN 60,0 81,000 ?- , WALNUT HILL. 30, ?= >> SCHWANZ LAKE 75,000 75,000 SCHWANZ LAKE-5'TH LAKESIDE $0 EVERGREEN 18,000 $18,000 THOMAS LAKE $0 RIDGECLIFF 6y0 0 'f ,06 12,50Q ?!0,00Q_ _ 12,5'" 5t Y C 11Q100n WALDEN HEIGHTS $0 WAILER/JACKSON MEAD NGAND $0 BC/BS 25,000 12,500 $37,500 TRAILS $0 - HEINE POND _$6 SOUTH OAKS WINECREST ALTHELEPIC SITE #3 '00, $45C,`0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #14 $0 TRAILS $0 CiHBORH00D PARK SECTION P28 to NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #21 AU NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 18 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 31E $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 24 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 36W $0 '' SGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 34_ $( NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 23 CCt4JNTIY CENTER co?nm TOTALS $485,003 $338,000 $266,000 $35,000 $217,000 $302,500 $57,500 $77,500 $1,778,500 PARK PROJECTS: 1986 SITE BUILDING/ UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC. & DESIGN/ ___._-__._ L2CATION --TI-- -- T-7.'-A IQN_ __ EL ?.-,- _.. _. - TERS LICHITNG PARKING _LANDSCAP.ING _ UM:: mot p{y??yq??,? HILLS RIVER 5, SgMlt WUU CINNAMON RANG 2 RAHN 1 40,000 46,000 52,500 7,500 5,000 ___- __ CEDARPARK___ 10,04Q_ __ . 3,5DO _._ 6,- 7 rn-. CARNELIAN PERIDOT PATH WOODHAVEfd BLACKHAWK PARK 0, u,?ti 0 QUARRY (COACHMAN) 80,000 41,500 25,000 20,000 7,500 10,000 000 PILOT KNOB HIGHVIEW U C. HOME 3,000 3,000 10,000 OC MIYJNSHINE LEXINGTON BURR OAKS LEAKY FISH LAKE WESCOTT STATION BERRY PATH PAT EAGAN KEIINE HOUSE 35,000 NORTHVIEW _.___ CARLSON LAKE OAK CHASE 10,000 2,000 5,000 000 WELL SITE --- RAVINE $6 $ COAT HILL-CAPRICORN 50,000 50,000 50,000 5,000 '1'9,0 0 WALNUT HILL 7,.-?? SCHWANZ LAKE 50,00 180,000 15,OQr, O SCHWANZ LAKE SOUTH $0 LAKESIDE EVERGREEN $0 THOMAS LAKE 200,000 12,500 $212,500 .__..RIDGEELIF ___ J9, 2_ 33,000 x,006 _ 12,500_ _ 80,000__ I2,5Q4 5, 0 X1310.000 WALDEN HEIGHTS $0 WINKLER/JACKSON $0 MEADOWLAND 60,000 34,464 2,000 10,000 15,000 10,000.- ._ $127,000..___ BC/BS 100,E 40,000 35,007 30,000 15,000 12,500 $220,500 TRAILS 40,000. $40,000 HEINE POND SOUTH OAKS WINDCREST ALTHELEITC SITE #3 $ NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #14 80,000 50,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 TRAILS $0 "-FIG RHCOD PARK SECTION X628.. $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #21 } NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 18 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 31 E $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 24 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 36W $0 'TIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 34 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 23 $0 Ca4JNTIY CENTER COMPLEX $0 TOTALS $1,115,000 $313,000 $373,500 $356,000 $202,000 $158,500 $124,000 $97,000 $2,739,000 PARK PROJECTS: ".87 SITE BUILDING,/ UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC. & DESIGN/ LL00ATICFt _ . ISITICti, .PREPARA' l` ---- ---- ---- - `00 ,_ ` SHELTERS LIGHTING PARKING LANDSCAPIN5 I RIVER HILLS a ?- ----- 3,000 ---- ---^ ----- ? CINNAA 10,00o..__ r 1,000 5,600 ?. - 're {hAi RAHN 2 RAHN 1 $ CEDAR PARK CARNVLIAN 3", C` / '61000 -),ODD 15,000 PERIDOT PATH kk)ODHAVEN 30,006 OX, BLACKHAWK PARK 100,0IX0 50,000 1{X),000 25,C00 $275,000 QUARRY (COACHMAN) 41,500 30,000 7,500 10,0G: $89,000 PILOT KNOB 40,( 70..___ w 30,000 . 30,000 20,000. 8,004 8,000 ?15 151,000- HIONVIEW $0 C. HOME $0 MDONSHINE _$O 15,000 10,000 30,000 5,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 $68,000 BURR OAKS 80,000 10,000 $90,000 0' LEARY 8',C 7,500 97,000 11.000 - -_ $243,504-- FISH LAKE $J WESCOIT STATION $' BERRY PATH PAT EAGAN $0 KIIINE FUSE 30,000 $30,000 NORTHVIE41 50,000 80,000 60,000 130,000 75,000 25,000__,_, 25,03 $045,000 , _ m.._ .._ ... CARLSON LAKE 10,000 15,000 1,000 10,000 15,000 3,000 $54,000 OAK CHASE $0 WELL SITE RAVINE $0 GOAT HILL-CAPRICORN $0 WALNUT HILL $O_ SCHWANZ LAKE $C- SCHWANZ LAKE 3[TIH $6 LAKESIDE 11,000 7,000 -5,000___ _- 5,1 $58,000 EVERGREEN 18,000 2,000 5,000 8,000 2,ODO $35,0 T OMAS LAKE 50,000 12,500 $62,500 RIDGECLIFF $0- WALDEN HEIGFILS WINKLER/JACKSON MEADaA.AND __$O_ 80/BS 40,000 30,000 $70,000 TRAILS $0 HEINE POND - _. _._ __...._.. _, _ _..._... _ $0 SOUTH OAKS 25,004 5;000 $30,000 WINDCREST ATHLETIC SITE #3 tE.ICHBORHCOD PARK SECTION #14 $0 TRAILS $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #28 100,0(30. $100,900 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #21 I:JHRGRIKOD PARK SECTION 18 '•EIG PARK SECTION 31E 80,000 00,00D I :IG RHOOD PARK SECTION 24 $0 EIG RE D PARK SECTION 36W $0 K RIK)OD PARK SECTION 34 !0' PARK SECTION 23 $0 cow ITER COMPLEX 40,000 $40,000 ___ALS $180,000 $493,000 $323,000 $240,000 $1,,,,90 $404,000 $87,500 $172,000 $2,077,00 PARK PROJECT`S: 1988 SITE 1 LDII:I UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC. & D:, JON/ .TICAN _ . .. AC''I c 7 ?. ?,. T F ? :; LIGHTING PARKING LANDSC'APIt, FnX !^ .-._ .. "A! f YEARS P N ; H LS IN 2 25,000 25,000 15,15)0 5,0 1N 1 CEDAR PARK CARNELIAN PERILDS P A T H ' 20,000 20,000 "YJ -,543,0 ? , y- p? ,. Y11Y 01.ACKHAWK PARK 50,000 150,000 25,000 25,00 25,400 $275,000 QUARRY (COACHMAN) $0 PILOT 'NOB 30,000 #30,000 HICa 1EW 40,004 20,000 3,000 20,0X) 8,00(7 5` C. 30 ON; IE n LEXINGTON $0 BURR OAKS 55,000 15,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 11,00 $130,000 0' LEARY 27,500 15,000 7,500 11,000;' 12,50, $73,500 FISFI LAKE r0 WESCOTT STATION BERRY PATH 5,000 3,000 $8,000 PAT EAGAN KEHNE HOUSE $0 NORTHVIEW CARL.SN LAKE 51 OAK CHASE WELL SITE 25,000 25,000 10,000 RAVINE GOAT HILL-CAPRICORN WALNUT HILL SCHWANZ LAKE _SCHWANZ LAKE-SUM $0 LAKESIDE 12,000 5,000 r `r?' $22,000 EVERGREEN $0 THOIAS LAKE $0 RIDGECLIFF WALDEN HEIGF 3 30,000 ,Gw 60,w6 5,000 10,000 000 25,vv3 y,2U5,000 WINKLER/JACKSON ;!,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 '1 g $100,000 MEADdr7LAND $0 BG/BS $0 TRAILS 40,000 $40,000 HEINE POND 10!Y5) 10,000 15,000 1,000 20,000 8,000 5,000 $69,000 SOUTH OAKS 00 1 15,400 3,000 15,000 OW W1006 WINDCRESf ALTHELETIC SITE #3 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #14 TRAILS $0 'IFIGHBORHODD PARK SECTION #28 100,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 $290,000 'FL.:- RHOOD PARK SECTION NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 18 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 31E 50,000 5,000 20,007 20,000 $145.000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 24 $0 NEIGHB7RHCOD PARK SECTION 36W $0 EIGHB7RHOOD PARK SECTION 34 `1) .',EIGl-fB0RHCODPARK SECTION 23 CCMUNTIY CENTER CaMPLEX $0 DS1'ALS $80,400 $345,00 $464,540 $240,000 $94,500 $250,000 $170,000 $129,000 __ ...$1,773,000 - RAF: : SM: 1989 SITE BUILDING/ UTILITY/ ROADS/TRAILS MISC. & DESIGN/ LOCATION _-PREPARATION_...,_ SMELTERS LIGHTING PARKING LANDSCAPING,...--ENGINEERING Y';:..! Z', RS RIVER HILLS CINNANDN RAHN 2 10,000 3,000 15,000 RAHN 1 CEDAR PARK CARNELIAN PERIDOT PATH W{701HIAVEId 20,000_ .._ ?rr= 3, X BLACKHAWK PARK QUARRY (COACHMAN) PILOT KNOB HIGHVIESa C. HOME 0 MDNSHINE _ .100 -----80,000,____,_ __,40,000 _50,000 15,000 40,000 20,000 -._ ---_20 000- L.ECINGPON $0 BURR OAKS .____O' LEAKY FISH LAKE WESCOTT STATION 100,00C 50,000 50,000 25,000 30,000 2,C_ 'a BERRY PATH $ PAT EAGAN 150,000 35,000 $185,06 KEHNE HOUSE $0 NOR VIEIV 'to CARL ON LAKE $0 OAK CHASE $0 WELL SITE $0 RAVINE 5,000 $5,000 GOAT HILL-CAPRICORN $0 WALNUT HILL $0 SCHWANZ LAKE SCHWANZ LAKE-SOUTH LAKESIDE EVERGREEN THOMAS LAKE $0 RIDGECLIIF $4--- WALDEN HEIGHTS $0 WIf KL.S/JACKSON $0 I? AD 7YJLAND _._ $0 HOBS $0 ' TRAILS $0 ' HEINE POND SOUTH OAKS $0 WINDCREST 80,000 20,000 $100,000 ALTHELFTIC SITE #3 150,000 25,000-- ---$175,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #14 $0 TRAILS $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION #28 - $O___ NEIGRHCOD PARK SECTION #21 120,000 $120,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 18 80,000 $80,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 318 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 24 100,000 $100,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 36W 80,060 $80,0()0 ::IIG3BORHOOD PARK SECTION 34 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION 23 80,000 $80,000 co?m NTER COMPLEX $0 u ALS $870,000 $335,000 $90,000 $110,000 $63,000 $85,000 $58,000 $143,000 $1,754,000 nuD9-um i j MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 a?' RE: STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS STAFF COMMENTS /Js 1385 Jurdy Road Eagan, Minn. 55121 November 4, 1985 i iaJ i.?ete`? AQa_ 8? xa S+s o D-,ll*, 424881 - r. - ) ROAD 442283 10 \` w.?•? /./?"?,."_'® ... ®G... ,. .-. a»e `i'?. v are-- ??? »?? - `? ',,. oeax+ 1.?,4 ` -? atn+3o ; oio'si a Os2-36 to ...w....a, 1? ;060°30 050-30 040°30 ?•t w. ('l x 033'88 `t\ f(f a».a - - _ _ - _ . :•a.x _ _ _ x,s a air- ?;,:r' `-` }• s "1Y ... QUARRY LAME „P ?. x f ?,yyp a 1 060.32 f r H , ? k, s +. {. f 041°31 J/,'1l .e ""116 .}+¢8- `8?'6 fl MOONSH INE s :!? x 7J" •" :?C?3 { E` s a City of EoW , ., •`6 • 'e o30°32 060-0 • ,1 •? { ?; • ?• i ? ? ,?..? A? `? ?° . PARK 040-32 050°32. ..,.. xa r ,. ?? ?,' '?,? *a , t• 4 .:?? I . b I . r 0 40 ?t f e< . II 4lA ? 'y,•GT `i _> c \ ? ,° :' "'7? " * exom ROC. DOC ,.s? I { 5i. 5.'" . c {;, 7t e' $.o. «......:is e+ M'f 1?a s+ i 'pQ •C •y rY <w '°8 Y°pe° !i ??7?' RDY RD al Toe; 010 -5 c, ? -`? ?. < ® ?; ar -``1 °?• e-." r x,. ,? 8e J e?`{. `,« fg ?{ +jI ?& \A ?? 4? E ? e ? y_ t ?w i?c (_ I _ _ A? xx AONNYW 020- .w, a° ?arr-x A __._.?' t14RT of of S SP w x`'O NIGH-SITE DRIVE 1 jj/ e' l r,a n a`e ?\ ® qq? 8f FIGURE 1 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DOROTHY PETERSON, RECREATION SUPERVISOR DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1985 RE: RECOGNITION OF VOLUNTEERS D A rV!!Dr% . There are several options and alternatives in regards to what form the recognition is given. These alternatives include the object to be given, time of year, place the recognition is given and the people involved in giving the recognition. The purpose of this memorandum will be to cover some of the issues involved with recognition in order to begin the process of determining who, what and where of the recognition issue. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS Staff proceeded with this report under some basic assumptions concerning volunteers and recognition. It should also be assumed that there may be alternative times and places for this recognition. Presentations and recognition might take place at: 1. The site of an event following its completion. 2. At an Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission meeting. 3. At a City Council meeting. 4. At a special time and place specifically established for this particular recognition, i.e. a luncheon, a prearranged photo session, or seasonal opportunities such as "Volunteer Recognition Week." Objects that could be used to recognize volunteers are as follows: 1. T-shirts. T-shirts are available in an array of colors and sizes. On the average a shirt can be purchased and printed at approximately $6.50. Larger quantities may result in a lower unit cost. T-shirts are probably most appropriate for the youth and youthful minded or those who participate in outdoor activities. Sizing may be a problem unless a significant number are purchased. 2. Caps. Caps are also available in an array of colors and are easily adjustable to sizing. A cap with a two color logo will cost approximately $4.50 per cap and like t-shirts, are very popular with a large majority of people. 3. Polo shirt or golf shirt. A more distinctive and upgrade from the t- shirt, this shirt is also available in an array of colors and sizes, but is obviously more expensive. Shirt and logo are estimated at approximately $15 each. Sizing and immediate availability of this, as well as t-shirts, can become an issue. 44. Badges, buttons and emblems. Department heads previously used badges which cost about .75 cents each - over a coat pocket flap - or a pin or button. A special design could be developed for such a badge/button. 5. Lapel emblems, printed with a baked enamel finish, can look attractive and are available for approximately .75 cents to $1.00 each. To review, the basic decision to be made regarding recognition of volunteers includes: 1) who is to be recognized 2) where will they be recognized 3) what object(s) will be used to convey recognition and is (are) most important to the individual and the service performed 44) when should the recognition be implemented 5) individuals who are to present the recognition. FOR COMMISSION ACTION Commission is to review and discuss the appropriateness of recognition for individuals identifying categories and objects for recognition, establishing a proposed budget for same. KV/js MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS "- I- TIC CC, -SION FROM: KEN VRAA, Dl _ _C.2 0 DATE: ? r 6, 1986 RE. -__E VIOLATIONS ISSUE: al hi 0, q l- Ci i-.vr ntri eta their l 3, cces: i 1 si mobil ° City bi " e: 3 ' -'i the reet on -'ie fur 3 n -1 at aia five les per .your. l? P1,0111 C- t? park , operty, 3 well as private )perty wi'_ iout # e written pern The o ce also spells ou hours of operati ".I a: of ne v, ails In late Nov- i pro___, coed--_- Th3 nny have at° to an previou rears. ver, part o. oblem with the lack of enfoi( went of the City ordinance period of December 5 through the 23rd. In prev'ai, the Cli'h has approached the City to res„°° 4-? - , , , '.l al Ri ` a Road within the boulevard. 7 h v st, I' 1e . When making the requ ', ha p ' 'oling cc t__a ith th' el 4w question t of pi rohnny C and n the Highline. 'ly membe -, - nM , a n 1 as road co--' f3 ae mnd ':3 cance L the benef i s when i. ynard Ohm, howev, _aat h z °4 r and will ask oti° ( :)s the clu' _'-d c.' this year. Th i e tnnce and y bed cal cause for the :- ° n -)f prcal A c-°a" ;s. 1` D be ,ie 1e .ie it The Eagan Police Dee rtment was at 1 t 1 snowmobile f p ti 1' ??Mn rities o.?, y _--- "y. This un' - a M ."ea rv ce unti' I ' e-t aber. Offs ai _ - ,id ays, Saturday >y the "overtime" ruling, I. L ds Act. In tion, incr snowfall may hay at a 0 >biling acitiv °';:y and coupled 1 less volu nteer , forceme a fros agan Club may ha° led to ai _ncrease in the number of oblems c ' th snowmobiles. The n'^ Police Department is atteh.p?;ing to r ordinance but may bF 1 t d. l r { 'T Th- --ary Crmmis..w_ai 01 ';ion and is askA to determi ne if it " °els a change in policy iles is apprcs e. The C_ nissi4 - 4 s,_ '_o inquii of the y ';ounce er Counc hav d -?oml 1- ,dg A ° 1 e. If the C - ;-i+ --, s to ma' cormut: v% L Lch wo . s' tly alt C or ° " c ; or po 1 ,, arding < t ;. may bE t°ae C to mak a of a probably sold ,a ml .,.,_p_„_fully submitted, KV/js CO c-I t ? f - E t i i C VMS go Von w an' t 1([ ft ^y t { a 1 ._ ._ i C-2 - 1 tom, ------------------- a ivr i 0 Cers NrYN3 \ 1,.. . C.N. 0 1-; o'INN so 0, t., --‘ AN . IN C.S.c-csfQ,„,:es- , - '''. . rnsc.,:c__Q--. cc,c) ss-c-si .c.:c 3 9scs P\- e- *-- -3 -1 0, '0,0'. '-0,..:' ,r's‘00C.' -NO e\ ee -s. 7k.,...... . '--3C*N. c.,6 ' \,-, e,_ ..i) A-V.- \<- ., C:,- ''z'Z',:, %.\-Nsa, vs-. CL 'C CA. 0.•‹-Nee\-e. . 0 y.,,, .,,.," 4,.. sese.,\Y3 IkkI'.., ' 1' ;°C) , ' - 'k s kk, , \Pk\ ikko-‘ * 3 e"-:"Crv' \ -... f,,\1-,e.„.., ' k o... '''..,. k s' ___c'1` r- -- 1,.\+" 0,._ \,,,,,,,,,,t1--.. y-,, \ r‘e.,A, -,, 4:---6.-veeN-\-- \---c_ ?csk,-.4' 4,,e7S Ce„ v,-& c.c.-S.,, vZ.) \o- C°'''''''''"1°'''‘.\,. o Oil KV/jS a _. _ strno, I'. E T . PE, r(ik, .P.F. 69.E-63 Pry 1985 He E_ Rea Outlets rc Dear IN R TT We woul: a I t mul- ally very truly, This 6e cot of t; is l : ,_ f(-%v Pnr l and __r'-2 m Thi tior, , is in 2. t port AP-50. S2A, in the ParK. lo- is 10- $? g standpoin 1t1 iensiI r the City of With -eption posed al a-.._ L for P-4 inc" ark. It i the 881.7 e of 881.7 reel arc al.sc "food an addition ". m `4m vide a grai y outle at th y. $18,000) mended the el of be estal ` 1 as the normal watt tion for Pond -49. DISCUSSION: A portion o sr,r., r outlet frog bond AP-5. , - .,.po for thy ructio n a ae e A r poses c:onstrUC pug a "" ft 1 gt term t^ t'lle t ly line of the Cliff continue no- a Iow d AP-49m Al. t, ,ravit 2311d Page 1. from Pond AP-50 tlyrrmcpl, „gyre,-l 011-76 along - n r;, ;sated str°eeF f-t Rahn Parka The and Park ^',o-ig the s P-49 Al s r 3t fo e a + equlre mor t3 or r d_M'-ance. It is also proposed as part o" ?t to construct a gravity sewer out'-'- from Pori AP49 ?_ ra to ?_ A a 9 F? Du C_ mended 1 for P- It stor--1 1' m wool- is one on 'ond to existing 2', AP--24m 's he gravity Dc considerations 5 T - fir' Pond AP-25 22 Pc 1 -1-49 l 22m 1.0 12.0 2«g th " tte,. nd tan or -24. It. i f tsar. .P-.50$ AP--2 are pro 6 ea0V-Wt--LLtS -- is project: 2311d D ,-r ! Temp- l 0.4 2.1 0.4 1.2 t m5 2.8 can b ~ed at n yty t s A are -o be 1 t th( a prop-- -y. A nre-L.;a::._,X assessmen ? ?xx bacl- port i m.: B. All project are with the ex, ptaon ,., 24 ° d'- st -°we B from Pond AP-50. z i n 1 and I e1.y t --l-76. all bE ar°cels These p the Cit, "l? txx w ?? . 11 the fates ale m n . in tie m kg1.e Family s F /Ind. ke sources to cover th of this follows: C t AY $1¢ TOT 17 $17L,107 +$,617 2311d 2311d -I_ 1-1-IX A : R LIMINA3.,? COST S 1,150 Lin. ft, , 0'-10' dp. in pl. 2(`° Li.n.ft» 1,-' It ? 10'-20' dp. in pl. gyn. ft.. 12" , 20'-30' dp. in Du Li ft. I-" RGr bLor i 30'_35' dp. i-- pl. $64 00/l.f. 6 4' di,. /cst . @ $950. 15 Li it. 1 » .` » 2 8 Cu.y s, p100.( cu.yd. LUMP SUM grub $1,500.(-' -t. 200 Cu.yds. stabili.zati $ yd. 4 Acres : cad r/mulcb 1,670 Lin.ft, °al on @ $ 1.00/lin.ft. -:a1 -5 v ) p w 6,760 8 .0 rp 1, 4 .»«« »...»»...........»........»..... :CJ 23124 AT . P B 21 t350 - zna ft . 330 t in. ft,, 530 L ii . -t. 6 E 2 1 1211 1_m" Std. 150 Cu.ydsa 3 Acres L.in, ft. /Ac. f T 1. C ies +30% Earn m, S Bond 10T.A mmm.d® ..........................®.. $7 23114 200 Lin.ft, d r" 0'-10@ d in pl. . $ 440 Lin, ft. , 10 -2 n pl. 16, 0 340 Lin.ft. 12" RCP , 0'10' d . /lgyf. 120 Lin.ft. 12" RC 10'-.-2, n pl.. _.aJ0/l.f, 3,,_0 60 Li . . -, 20" n pl. @ $52>00/l.f. 3,120 80 Lin.t-. J c'l_ -- .s. ----, r X120.00/1.f. 9,600 5 Each Std. 4 :stg. $950.0 4,750 30 L4-.ft. 1 depth ian 8 gip. C m l," 0 1 -. 9 . -. 2 hacn 1 nd w/ 20 C+u yds. y M r r 1 TO . 2311d D7s e: v I INA- c TI 1,38 g° Rte/s.f, 8(-,-_., 898,240 705,790 $0.050 $ an 8 5 ,t LC3 '),In 1A Ar0 7 ................................................ $1 1£S,IUt I3.) "0 P '1± $ 2,015 23114 I x,l B E 21 0 2000 NO R 1 H 1 1 ? f EI rid efficiency d eff- fiveness. >i cri m^ rvpenin v, 1 ; Y ? -, 7 to ,. 14• ?1 Inc. Work e i _n lat I .o Octobe request for p< as ma' I ved by the City Council of n Contract er_ r,o , a al the -lope c ly only 0 unit quanta' The original cc_.ttract provided for a D_---_t of tonsoil from Goat Hill Park to Walnut Hill Park. Durin construe -I that Walnut _l' had a 'I i t] black di fr >m the t pore v do mni tr w.apsoil to. .-ng .,.. y `10,)00. Location of both the storm ai 1%ary at Goat Hill The revision provided for effi Lent or routin- utilitities, but increased the _c3t of cor __'yuction by air The pl nned chery I ility at n ; Hill apprc 1 _0 ft. i;, revi con' a ,Meta nn l i ' bal_-n I is also r._ t -I into t side of a hill in emplin s 1 IC rc t _ on yA 6, _ t Quantity Variations -----t'ties of s" eral itr-- 'Prom < n l c antract +® s. t ._ n --t rm Park tonal subgrade excavation as a result of poor so! l ig lot and trails. This resulted in an additional .t. cost of $1,200. 2. Additional muck excavatio-_ i".iin tt of ',on soils. This ct 3. 1 1 n d 1 I ac'II r ' 1-0 . Al ala 4,op?oil )o'Li OW L %I L below the c '.ginal . al 1}. The rEvised curb from B618 to B612 rt?.:_i x E 1, 5. SM, Mv. -: r ill 1. I c' 'itional sod was necessary to stabilize the side slopes of the entrance drive and adjacent areas to the ballfield. Additional soddi a was $5,000 above the original estimate 2. The ` mated quani°-it ' „f r ' a 11 diamon ' was ban on t d with say $4,200. Walnut Hill Park 1. As previously mentioned, the salvage topsoil quo tity f t Hill Park was not utilized and topsoi' sir Ti ,'mated qu t i c, e..... ::`_Imated n , res _ ting in r c 4 } 1 yak 1. C, excavation resulted in higher cubic yards which r 3 $1,700 increase. 2. Sod quantities. 4,400 higher than or_,,- . 2 1+ 0 ua 6, a6 T Cher wer in the scope of ; hi( in a s 3.v of of -)r oximately 9% under budget at T Park, 3 budget at coat Hill Park, 13% under budget at Walnut Hill Park and 17 o budget at r"ish Lake Park. Final construction cost of the entire g,ro ject was $455,, 6.51. represents construction cost only. ( a -g and a, t ati not included.) Th al cost of the 1_ revised contract ~t of $496,0- $476,837. Thus, cost w,. 1 approximately $31,0 1 _ ess than , 'r ' 1 est 1. Construction Administration In general, the project was run efficiently and effec Th" result of rock approach" between the L n Y` a k pace, f out thi r t. L .a.t,a1 - 3 c __it 7__-,- ._nd, . ?__ eLcular, .. -r__ i_-t_ The survey and staking work that is performed by the City's cor 1t' a engineering f i ,m of B.R.A.A. was precise and coordinat d well contractor's -is. The survey crew's location within t fl-ft, _. immediate a2c "?s.lity when necessery. Their familiarity resource in several instances. The survey crew chief is to his contributions to this park project. The utilization of B.R.A.A. for inspections, quantity verification al constrructio-- iary was not as successful. Generally, the inspector. busy wits y other City projects and, at times, the City's park pr <; not receive continuous attention because of other higher priority t?,e» tasks. For example, the backfilling and utility insp. A ca > terized accounting system provided a pr ..-i q .°- ,ities, was accessible, precise a ?d pd ., P Witt this change of process. 3 ' : • . , o ,Jl ory J Continuation of s be continued. It was felt that rnt savings was made by comb mLng four park one contract. This --ip-9oach is planned for 1986. ®.ficatio h i ?quir°ed the contractor to bid o:. number -f qt p - y f with the flexibility to -Gel °tiating change orders. Cx. we.. __,;-l -Y r City. on e roject was finishe. .vithin the sched_ It was constructed i budget and can be con : d d a successful pr D®-ect for the City. KV/jj z} Project evelopment has c the rk park lud d wit' -.n Imp ) _ _. Cent-- ct 86-1 Crosb 1 ;h Oaks, Pilot Knob and Cc - is r( lb + , ?.alysis, design develr°-- for b Coc,, d Pilot Knob Parks. Th r, de Dy +"~ Iff. I an e A w d wb d a ?. February 6 - The Advisory Park Tecreation Commission will layout, design dev( '._ at and a preliminary cost -1 6 - The Advisory Park Re( tion Commissio !View construction plans, specifi rid a final co March 20 for bid April 3 - 1 i I ry Parks RE )n ion wi 11 be upd t' status of the project a I bid April 11 .. Pod opening. L 15 -ity Counci' will i r c tract amoun` Any Improvement Cont.. :t 86--1 c _.,;_. " on will begin. SS/JS 1