02/06/1986 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionAG
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION CO $ ION
EAGAN ® MINN TA
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
7:00 P.M.
FEBRUARY 6, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. INTRODUCTION - NEWLY -APPOINTED COMMISSION MEMBER
3. ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1986
4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
a. Chair
b. Vice -chair
c. Secretary
5. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
a. Stuarts First Addition - Stuart Nolan
b. Bur Oaks Hills - Harstad Co.
c. Advent United Methodist Church
d. K. Charles Development
6. OLD BUSINESS
a. Park/school site acquisition - Section 14
b. Park dedication review
c. Volunteer & contributers recognition - committee report
d. Park location - Section 21 (Motions to defer to future meeting)
e. Draft letter - Dakota County Bicycle Trails Plan
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Road name
b. 1986 budget - distribution
c. Letter of support - Presidents Commission on American Outdoors
8. PARK DEVELOPMENT
a. Park shelter buildings
b. Park Concept Plan review & cost projections
9. OTHER BUSINESS & REPORTS
a. Update storm sewer
10. ADJOURNMENT
provements - Rahn Park - City project 452
It .t i ^y Commission ill be
A"'-- all to Orde -1 the 1
intro? L, q of the newly- - L i. r, Mr.
'( lc ing adoptia .r the approval of i a
rf t°°, s- will I, ' -lection of '. a _.,r
or to t' n of off , i' -aid b
f( set its st e' committees.
. . _ y t,_ - The
ly
c adle 1 a
iue. Its t iately of O'Leary Pa _o.
is is g a cas- ration al __ with i " ity of a t
L xixa6 .,:, Thi0 . oper should also c,," a tot 1''
The seco __ s Bur C k Hills d by Harstad
S o, v
r -
.. y E r 1
The third item is I t Unite, Ihr ' Bch
p' - :r This _iurch ( v ® opment i 3 y a 14 t
E-- Pa-'rr ff is that
dE 01 °11 _.1.uirem aperty
L, ton AN ,y of thiw
lament Pr-p---' _ e -'r a
'acility .._ 1 Lve
-'lot Knc Road. Staff i r cas] ation
r c
OLD "u,
Staff 1 t g ' 1
Old Bu _'he fir
wLll fin fi
t meet-*.,- e
site. It under i- th- 1
S : cn 21. as deferred from tha r meeting Staff
i ` Cerre because of the lend _;
d Bu_' is a draft l titter p
sory Co i is to r v
_o be in- in local p r°s prio
Plan
1
three i nd( 3us' l s. the f
s an is: _ from tU - City C
} d.
TI.., 1986 City budge t has been complete, = comp l d, Copies o_ _ad et
will be distributed to members of the Adv -'y C ®s `.on.
TI nal ite rn New u ss is a letter of .)port
n- J .. '_ C-_ _n A_- C--tdoors. A -mmo
3 _ tl^ fc-, 4_w.
C 1
cc ' at the of ° ° we
--- f--113 _ iitbed,
Director of Parks Recreation
KV/js
2
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
MIMES OF A RMEETING THE
ADVISORY PAW'S! ?g?RECREATION CO ,?
EJ G , pAff-H- NNESO1
JANUARY 9, 1936
AGENDA
Commission member Bertz moved, Alt seconded, the agenda be approved with t-
two add-ons to "Other Business." The motion earrid..
MINUTES OF DECI . ER 5,
Commission member Carroll moved, Kubik seconded, .he minutes be appran v ed as
presented. The motion carried.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT P.D. - DAVE G BERT
I
IV. 'h & Rec.
Cc T'u M O, t3?4 P±
RENICK ADDITION - MARK REMICK
Parks Planner, Stephen Sullivan, su_?ested moving 'te n.uu t<<? 1 u" .he
DEERWOOD WHOM - IND. SCH. DIST. 196
SILVER BELL I, DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - OFFICE WAREHOUSE
The developers are proposing a 102,000 sq. ft. warehouse similar to the R.L.
Johnson warehouse. The building would have interior loading bays and the
proposal is adhering to the landscape policy. Commission member Carrall
moved, seconded by Fedde, the recommendation to accept cash dedication. `'h
motion carried.
Adv. Parks & Rec. Comm.
January 9, 1986
FEBRUARY PROPOSALS
OLD BUSINESS
CI LANDSCAPING POLICY
The landscaping policy was approved at 'a joint meeting of the City Council and
Advisory Planning Commission and is now being implemented.
PARK SYSTEMS UPDATING
DAKOTA COUNTY BIKE
I
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
Sacs OBTLES
RAHN PARK - STORM SEWER PROJECT
13
dv Pa 7. R',
d snu rr;y ?', 1 ? r>
Consensus of the Commission was a preference to have Pond AP-49 byp
altogether. If that is not possible, then the engineers should pick a roe
which would have minimum impact on the trees. Public Works Director C;olb
said he would include Commission concerns in his review of all proposed
alternates for the storm sewer system.
PARKLAND STUDY - SERVICE SECTION 21
This item was deferred to the February agenda.
PARK DEVELOPMENT
FINALIZATION OF I.C. 85-1 - SPRING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
This report was included in the p ket. The Dir r ;" '' n r
j- u
reviewed significant aspects of th report ire?' ca L Y -, ins ,
that will be made. The report c ,ntcd tbo C c _ Ina . j_c A w l
changes given.
CONSTRUCTION UPDATE - LIGHTING CONTRACT
Stephen Sullivan said that lights would be on at the Goat Hill and ?s d? ci.iPP
rinks on Friday, January 10. He explained the problems which ca.auses a itiay
in having the lights on sooner.
1986 SPRING CONSTRUCTION - TIME LINE
Director Vraa reviewed the time line included in the packet and was :+ss3Fci
to be coordinated with Commission meeting dates. Members reviewed the dates
and accepted the time line.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES - PARK SHELTER BUILDINIGS
This item was deferred to the February meeting.
OTHER BUSINESS
JOINT MEETING - JANUARY 28
This item was deferred to the. February agenda.
ROUND TABLE
Commission members had an opportunity to `r` 3 tb r aIaI
concerns they would like to have addressed. ;.,ll ?s a toss bi°ought
up:
5
SCOTT MORGAN
Intern Scott Morgan was hired as a recreaisi. n supervisor for in California, He will live in Indio, Ca 11. fornia and s : Iii a _ s
early in February. Commission members e ?n?r?d Scott on `;' nc 1s_d
for Eagan.
OIL- PROPER - UPDATE
The City Council authorized staff to make an offer to the owner of the 15-acre
parcel. Director Vraa stated that if more land cannot be obt-t_ !.ned fie: m the
Ohmanns, the 15-acre parcel will become a neighborhood park and an athletic
site will be selected elsewhere.
SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
School District 196 Community Education Advisory Council wishes to have a
representative from the Eagan Parks & Recreation Commission. Sandy Bertz
volunteered to be Eagan's representative.
SCHOOL DISTRICT 197
The school district will share in the cost, of equi rc -cI, '..'o, be installed at
Pilot Knob Park/school amounting to approxa.ina tely $6,000.
JOUR
Commission member Carroll made the motion, seconded by Bertz, to adjourn the
meeting. All voted in favor. Time of adjournment was 11:00 P.M.
Dated:
Advisory Parks & Recreation Secretary
6
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: STUART'S FIRST ADD (Stuart Nolan)
LOCATION: TOMARK 2ND ADD, NW4, SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 15, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for preliminary
plat approval for the Stuart's First Addition. The plat consists
of 144 apartment units on 9.5 acres (2 outlots), east of Lexington
Av & west of Carriage Hills Golf Course.
ZONING & LAND USE: The site is zoned R-4 multiple and is surround-
ed by the same zoning on all sides except for an agricultural
lot along the SW property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designated this area as R-III, density 6 - 12 units per acre.
Golfview Rd will be continued to the west and meet Lexington
Av directly across from Town Centre 100 Rd. The applicant has
an option on the land north of this road extension. This area
contains a ponding area and is quite low in relation to the existing
Lexington Av, which is scheduled for improvements in 1988. The
subject area is rolling grassland and has little or no mature
vegetation.
SITE PLANNING: There are two, (2) buildings proposed, each contain-
ing 72 units and underground parking. One additional 10' parking
stall _has been provided outside thus meeting Code requirements
in terms of size and numbers. These buildings will be connected
by a covered walkway to a centrally located recreation building.
This building will contain a sauna, whirlpool, spa, excercise
room and possibly an indoor pool. A tot lot will be provided
near the recreation building. O'Leary Park, across Lexington
Av, will contain tennis courts when the parks development takes
place.
A secondary loop service drive will connect the parking areas
and provide emergency access to the recreation building area.
This -drive will have knock-down bollards at the parking lot point.
The buildings and parking areas meet or exceed all City setback
and coverage requirements.
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 2
JANUARY 28, 1986
COMMENTS: The tentative project name will be`Carriage Crossings'.
These apartments will be made of 100% brick with redwood gables.
This style should be quite compatible to the surrounding area.
The apartments will be marketed as a higher income rental project.
Extra amenities include: fireplaces in some units, larger more
usable balconies and easy access laundry facilities in addition
to the enclosed recreation building features. The interior con-
struction will include staggard stud walls and gypcrete to help
eliminate typical apartment noise as much as possible. Tentative
rent prices will be approx. $575, $675 and $775 for 1, 2 and
3 bedroom units respectively.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan that the applicant submitted
is feasible and within City Codes. Although the grading operations
will disturb almost the entire site, there is no substantial
vegetation or trees that the grading will affect. Staff recommends
the applicant review his grading plan in the area between the
tot lot and rec building to provide better positive drainage
to the north. As it is now, water will stand in this area.
Also, the grading done on this development shall not adversly
impact the existing from the County's culvert under Lexington
Av and the private culvert under an existing dirt road at the
SW corner of this proposed development. The County will probably
replace the existing culvert with the upgrading of Lexington
Av in 1988. The grading plan, as proposed, shows filling of
up to 8' over existing sanitary sewer line along the easterly
portion of this proposed development. The existing cover is
about 10' presently, making the total proposed fill over the
pipe about 18'. While this depth approaches the maximum fill
height over the PVC sanitary sewer pipe, staff does not feel
this should pose any problems because the depth is still within
the allowable limits for backfilling over PVC pipe.
Prior to the grading operations and until the completion of the
restoration over this site, this development shall install adequate
erosion control measures to prevent the depositing of sediment
within existing City storm sewer lines in Golfview Dr or within
the existing low area in the SE corner of this proposed development.
This development is located within drainage district "D". The
existing and future runoff will be toward the north and eventually
into pond DP-10. Project 443 (O'Neil pond) will provide the
gravity outlet from pond DP-10 downstream through DP-5 and DP-4.
The downstream system from DP-4 is currently in place all the
way to the Minnesota River Valley. As a result, this development
will not require any trunk storm sewer construction to accommodate
its runoff.
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 3
JANUARY 28, 1986
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth are in place adjacent to this property to
provide service to it.
The sanitary sewer may be extended from the end of the existing
Golfview Dr westerly within Golfview Dr. The applicant can also
extend the existing 8" water main within Golfview Dr westerly
and connect into the existing 18" water main on the west side
of Lexington Av to complete the watermain loop within this area.
At the writing of this report, it is the developer's intention
to proceed with the installation of public utilities and streets
under a private contract. The developer must submit plans and
specs prepared in accordance with City standards for review and
approval prior to final plat approval.
STREETS: Lexington Av (Co. Rd. 43) abuts this development along
the west and Golfview Dr is stubbed to the NEcorner of this proposed
development. Dakota County Hwy Dept maintains jurisdiction over
Lexington Av, which is presently a two lane rural section roadway.
Dakota County proposes on improving Lexington Av to a 52' wide
minor arterial collector street in 1988. Golfview Dr is an existing
residential City street.
This development proposes to extend Golfview Dr westerly to Lexing-
ton Av. This intersection will be directly across from Town
Centre 100 Dr.
TRAILWAYS: Because of the designation of Lexington Av as a minor
arterial roadway, City policy will require a trailway along both
sides of Lexington Av. The trailway portion adjacent the westerly
border of this property will be the responsibility of this develop-
ment. Because the actual installation of this trailway will
not be until 1988, staff recommends this development prepay for
the trailway installation as referenced under the assessment
paragraph.
PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining
the following permits prior to final plat approval.
1) MPC sewer extension permit
2) Mn Dept of Health water main extension permit
3) Dakota County Hwy access and work within County right-of-way
permit
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends this development dedicate
the full 60' right-of-way for the Golfview Dr extension on the
final plat.
The previously platted Tomark Add provided for a 55' half right-of-
way for Lexington Av. This width should be sufficient for the
upgrading of Lexington Av to 52' in the future. However, because
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 4
JANUARY 28, 1986
of the potential grading required to rebuild Lexington Av, staff
recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent
the westerly boundary of this proposed development.
Staff will require increasing the easement over the existing
sanitary sewer to 30' centered over the sewer line because of
the additional fill proposed by this development. Because the
easterly parking lot for building #2 will be encroaching the
sanitary sewer easement, staff recommends that the applicant
enter into an agreeement with the City whereby the applicant
will agree to pay for any parking lot and trailway restoration
necessary if the City has to repair the sanitary sewer line in
the future.
ASSESSMENTS: The City assessment records indicate that for outlots
A & B of the Tomark 2nd Add, all trunk area related assessments
for water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer are either levied
or pending with the exception of lateral benefit from trunk water
main. This development will be responsible for the lateral benefit
from trunk water main as illustrated in figure #2 along its westerly
boundary at the rate in effect of final platting. In addition,
staff recommends this development prepay its multi-family rate
for Lexington Av future improvements along with the future trailway
improvements. The following table summarizes the assessment
responsibilities for this development.
Assessment Summary
Est'd 1986
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Lateral Benefit from 480 f.f. $11.88 $5,702
Trunk Watermain
Lexington Av 480 f.f. $63.36 $30,413
Trailway 480 f.f. $11.81 $ 5,669
.Total $41,784
All costs associated with the installation of the public improve-
ments will be the sole responsibility of this development.
CONDITIONS:
1) The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if
only 2 stalls per unit are provided with this project.
2)_ Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment
regarding-park dedication.
3) •A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and a bond
not to be released until 1 year after landscaping is completed.
4)_ Golfview Dr shall be extended out to Lexington Av.
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 5
JANUARY 28, 1986
5) This development shall not adversly impact any existing drainage
patterns with its site grading.
6) This development shall loop the existing 8°' watermain within
Golfview Dr to Lexington Av.
7) This development shall be responsible for obtaining the neces-
sary permits from MPCA, MN Dept of Health & Dakota County
Hwy Dept.
8) This development shall grant the City a 20' slope easement
adjacent Lexington Av right-of-way.
9) This development shall dedicate a 30' easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and enter into an agreement to pay for
restoration of parking lot or trailway where either encroaches
upon the City's easement.
10) This development shall dedicate a full 60' right-of-way (outlot
C) for street purposes.
11) This development shall be responsible for lateral benefit
from trunk water main and prepayment of its multi-family
equivalent for Lexington Av upgrading and also for the trailway
construction.
12) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
r l4
Jr
D'LEARY PARK---
as
K0?5T E } -?
=k ) , E
AIL EK ??
OCRESf A .. ,•
{.? ARK \t ,.
•?m+1wr W w?+kw+W+W w?r?+?
!fL^ ?Cfj
R-4
A
A, r ? F r
f?S
p { GAP
OEN
R-4
A
0
IM/
tf ai l7
I-
z
J 4
a
a
z 1
Q
r t4
1 t is proposing to develop the South Del :ills P.M.
(: 11 0 1cs Pa' ) nto 204 single family r' 'dential lc T'ie Sot k
D-l- Hills P.U.O. previously proposed bott - -1 -, and tw: Lg
with a P.M. c : gent to provide parklanc' dedicatior king
apprrm_imately 28
This devc , c t
dedicated.
The Advisory C shoal' ;ermine if the proposed changes it
dedication are rble <s :d or require revision.
HISTORY - Svc 72"
T e -story of par - in tt - u s
ri_ ill hi '-l -t some of the me ,e
tra( kg the hilt .)arks 7o 3,1 to tt
the -ity firs .9 . , on for
z°
m
M.D. for the - e- as South Del-
parcel was sorr- Ll r a lr.t is now cony c h
a-s) considerEi re rent i 'ch was part of Inv
- i it appli tzon fi 1976 -1 12277, . ` P
ssibilit rec
ily a:°c
7. i five acre tas fl d c 'sle fc
In Octob " of 11177, ' Crov 1't- A_, zo
within it ty c_ °'t '.ic` 1 t l no ac.. m
J.
the P.U.D. 'n ? ugust f 1979, th _ 'dvi y ?arks Score
o l
recommended, and was o by the develo , to provide i t
of app oximately 2- crew Al io d
prouiG T+,n for a tr° -a ?1a - 1-k
acre with.'
d v t c
I fc
i semi - of pi. lie ' ?- ie Advisory
a °. visory Parks Recreation Cc issio--; f ti conside
r t c -ur__ Oaks on the c ?v o_,er, 'edict l
1 28 '' p__
City
bal.. ( v rea.
P.U®D,
1
II I ;ion, of the 10.3 acres above the high water line the l , as 2.9
acre .ten size and only six acres has slopes of less than 14%.
2
In rev- - p irk concept pro.% led with the eliminary pla
the follc c _ .meats: (See att "Devel ar ark Propc ).
1) soccer and ball fields ar( c 9 tely ov, ,7
operly oriented, ortic exten('
=refore, its useful'
2) lct is lo b .,,,._a t -n single family just
regv- its. Staff is concerned wit' r ' atial
c jecti( to park usag - once these `-c ecome occupied.
3) - - --- ,.n pl- , M? '' -- „va ttea l
_o ee t
l' d n a 3 s to a
In order to complete the ne
proposes to build a series or E i
length and at places, up to ..' 1-
psychologically separates the open spat ?rved
om the park and relegates it to an unusable area. doubt
@er retaining walls will save the adjacent oak r 3ould be
e entually lost because of dirt"-bance a---)ciate~'
4) The pro t °ailway aroun _ akE
elevatior f 820 with 13 lot location and -" >
flooding.
5) The proposed tennis courts on _ art _ corner bec, fill ar(
requires a retaining wall to f cilitate 't.
6) The props om, f Dr the 4C , 1 y rzr" f
re,- lo- ocont s1"
wi ' disf v wi o parks pl px t clos( a
ty -field to ritial lots.
In response to the developer's parks plan and to meet tl l
s't ed, s'': s , ?epared e d I k desi ( °«
T,__
f' A. T'
,1 relationsh"
ion from zz`; o ° is o
t (,-ld need to r p_ part o" y
with five resid atial lots. equiv t to tely
1.5 acres. Other recommendations for consid an incl
1) v-,-r-- re°-p• ')le for gradinr, and restoru,ion of the area for
c_r n
2) That the pro; the lake b f ° in
the 820 contou?.
3) The 1 ng fingerlike projection on the east tde propose
de ° i (part of the William Bros. Pipelia 1) L11 not for
park; `.edication which is approximately .8 of az °
3
DNS
c
r t City Paz
Recreation Department.
Second, t}" Orel ope- is to submit erosion control plan and
Director
KV/js
LI
nd
ry
1
:aff Is
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
December 10, 1985
MR JAMES MERILA
MERILA & ASSOC INC
7216 BOONE AVE NO
BROOKLYN PARK, 55326
RE: BUR OAK PARK - BUR OAK HILLS - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Dear Mr. Merila:
The purpose of this letter is to rerpnnd to your inqui' _. c
dedication in the vicinity of Bur Oak Pa?• and the Soul' .U.? .
The South Delaware Hills P.U.D., of wh_ch you are ct r -,ni,ly p?_ann ing a
proposed development called Bur Oak Hills, has a negotiat,_'d parr ar°> be
dedicated to the City at the time of development. Inasmuch as the ar be
given for parks purpose was the result of a negotiated agreement an ame
part of a contract, I see no reason at this time to make any charge n t .'e
proposed park area. However, if it can be demonstrated that l:h.,: is a
significant benefit to the parks system because of property line Qh n ;_ , t is
may be permissible.
In summation, the City has a nE,cr, f..ated agr eem-1t for :s a' -t hLpk the utE
Delaware Hills P.U.D. and sees no reason to modify that a-z >ement.
Should you have further questions regarding this particular area, pleas e feel
free t contact me.
Si r ly,
Ketr raa
Director of Parks & Recreation
KVIjs
CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner
THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STP[ N(fH AND GR0VPH! IN OUI C MMUNiW
`?
?..p?.?
,,?r ,
`°, ;.
??
r ? ` . ?' x ?.' '?.a
? ?- ?t j ?
:t .??'?
??°
i ._
_E
- ?s?? ? ,?
FlAs
QUIT
I
i i
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS)
LOCATION: NEa, SEa, SW4, SECTION 12
EXISTING ZONING: PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 23, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED
An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat
for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned
Development in Section 12.
ZONING & LAND USE
This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway
149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the
north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for
this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots
are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family)
classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line.
BACKGROUND!COMMENTS
There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still
valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and
any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary
plat of 1979 will require another public, hearing. Therefore,
this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family).
The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas
that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat.
As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area
will be graded substantially.
The Parks and Recreation Dept has briefly reviewed this site
and is opposed to it for several reasons:
1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed
by the proposed grading.
.2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along
the weste°rn" property line where typically 5.1 is needed for
practical use/maintenance.
3) The access into the park- is only one lot wide fronting Rolling
Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and
Consultant was for a four lot area.
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1985
PAGE 2
The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable
reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication
requirements.
GRADING
The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer-
ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes
and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter-
sections. There are several intersections where this 2% grade is
exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan
to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections.
Because of the rugged topography, there are several areas on
the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these
slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain
once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time,
these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result,
the staff will recommend a detailed pro oral from this applicant
as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also,
staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec-
tions where he does not achieve a 2% lope for 100' past the
intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach
on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site,
staff recommends the applicant obtai written authorization
from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowi g them to perform the
necessary grading operations within Willia s Brothers easement.
DRAINAGE
The proposed grading in this site will
existing drainage patterns. This site
drainage district G as shown on FigurE
eventually ends up into Pond GP-l (Burr
outlet is in place for this pond whic
ponds that all have positive outlet;
valley.
not change any of the
is located within major
1. All of this site
Oak Pond). A positive
z outlets to downstream
to the Minnesota River
This development will be responsible for providing the necessary
ponding area for GP-1 and also for the portion of Pond GP-8,
located within this development.
This development will require the extens:
between Pond GP-8 and Pond GP-l. It also w
of -trunk storm sewer from GP-l southerly i
If the applicant chooses to have this w(
contract, then the_ City Council must a
prior to final plat approval. If the dev(
City trunk storm sewer privately, then it
because the City has no provisions to pr
performed privately.,
on of trunk storm sewer
ill require the extension
°o its-southern boundary.
)rk performed under City
uthorize such a project
doper chooses to install
will be at his own expense
ovide credits for work
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
SANITARY SEWER
This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis-
trict N-EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending
a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick
up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N-EE. However,
the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter
of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub-
district N-EE to subdistrict N-AA. Because of this, staff re-
evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line.
Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer
line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N-EE,
thereby eliminating the necessity of any trunk sanitary sewer
within this area.
This development will be responsible for extending sanitary
sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to
provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within
Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary
sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also
to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway
55.
WATER MAIN
This development will be. responsible for extending an 8" water
main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into
the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible
to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries
where appropriate.
STREETS
Trunk Highway 149 borders
77th Street abuts the e
Highway 149 is under the
of Transportation and is
West is a - rural roadway
Grove Heights.
the westerly portion of this development.
asterly edge of this development. Trunk
jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department
a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street
section under the jurisdiction of Inver
With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills
Circle cul-de-sac, -staff - agrees with the applicant's street
plans.
Staff recommends not approving the bubbles for the following
reasons:
1. -There is -no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying
to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles.
2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle.
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
3. The large paved areas within the bubbles create safety hazards
as children tend to play in them and they are located too
close to the through streets.
4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers
using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width
and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact.
5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up
to the north for a future potential loop street through
this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling
Hills Drive located within the panhandle.
Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should
be eliminated because the only service it provides is for an
additional lot or two. Tot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather
small for a corner lot anyway.
The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary
turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant
will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street
West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS
As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall
dedicate 60' right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter
cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat-
ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the
preliminary plat.
This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over
all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within
city- right-of-way. - This development will also be responsible
for obtaining easements through the park property, if required
by the Park Department, for utilities.
PERMITS
This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary
permits:
1) MPCA sewer extension.
2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension.
3) MN Dot Access Permit.
Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons
per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation
of an EAW. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility
of this developer. Staff -recommends that no final plat approval
be granted until the City receives all-permits.
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 5
ASSESSMENTS
In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found
that this development is still responsible for trunk area water
main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments
because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments
as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on
Figure 3.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE
Main (010-54,
011-04,010-79,
010-75,010-76,013-80)
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 165,530 (1) 0.05/S.F. 8,276
(013-80)
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 4.2 Ac $1,353/Ac (2) 5,683
Upgrade (011-04)
Total $97,259
(1) Includes 20% credit for streets
(2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid)
The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting
at the rates in effect at that time.
CONDITIONS:
1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must
be approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be
obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their
easement.
3) A a condition of approval,- this development shall insure
that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP-8
to pond GP-l and the southern boundary for future extensions.
4) This development shall insure that sanitary sewer facilities
are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide
for future extensions for later developments.
„BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 6
5) This development shall insure that an 8"" watermain is looped
through this plat from T.H. 149 to the existing watermain
within Chapel Ln. Extensions of water lateral to the east
and south boundaries will also be required for future service
extensions,
6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed
cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half
cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubble") in the SW corner & the
half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr "bubble") in the NE corner
shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future
extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This
development shall be responsible for all costs associated
with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver
Grove Heights.
7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cui-de-sac in
the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with
platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate
connection to Chapel Ln.
8) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of
Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30"
easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located
within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility
easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part
of the final plat.
9) All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies
shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
10) This development shall be responsible for all the additional
assessments required with this- proposal as determined by
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
11) If-public improvements are to be installed under City contract,
the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
.UGE, .IDE EL FI R, P. A.
ATTORN77Y=7 AT s-.Avg
CEDARVALE F;.0 LLZ EUtL E NGS
3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 85122
PAUL H. HAUGE
KEVIN W.£IDE
DAVID G. KELLER
LORI M. BELLIN
MICHAEL J. MAYER
Mr. Dale Runkle
Eagan City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
January 16, 1986
Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development
Dear Dale:
AREA CODE 612
TELEPHONE 454.4224
You have asked me to clarify the developer°s rights under the South Delaware
Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being
proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18,
1979.
A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent c= other zoning
classifications with specific code criteria for 1 _r::1 use, : r-bec ;s,
parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planed s?>??elc>i? _>n ?onr pct t=it_h
its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a ?r lied DE 1o ,en?_
designation is a superimposed zoning designation (section 11.20, Subd. 8)
which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a
planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and
aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be
feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the
community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning.
Very truly yours,
DGK:ras
cc: Thomas Hedges
HAUGE, FIDE & KELLER, P.A.
David Keller
?,
_? t ?
«?'' +?
Preliminary Plat
-Of?. ?.° ,
SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS
7-1
\\,??\\}} s ? r r 1 s _ r • o?
J)l
44 ?
e !Rx* l `. s?,?l.J?` ?i ' s;:ri eroF, E, a.*s: awe.
N o;
e
°".? 7 "ti ®r -°?'??.1.?.-1` 9.rj '??? ,a ..? _ ? ` t 4??1 ""` I ?' f J. ?' r ?a?',??? •fi r ' o ? `•
- ! _
° 7
BU OAK HILLS
N, Je u I ( f T. HAMAD
7'?l? ?r2 /JJ { a } t ?; 4 • "'1 = \ :e®a ?vm vzi
"All
:f?.:e '?.' -_ - .. t •...i. STY!
?/ / o d y m c. t PRELIMINARY PLAT
--------- "?.? L ' f to „ t 2 ,
TOTAL ? TOTAL AREA av wssn:
• MAL u." or'OTS 4-4 Lou
I
_ e <:.`? n+_._ - ?'..> / ~. / - P ., of '•' -. ! L? AMR.
var.aa.
T -Au ft r < sv?m
S ` t1y tt/ // t?!u?)i oW
mru m?u anw a°r-%
?•. cco :' . e:»s 4 `-'.- ¢ ?,. C_ -f'? 3 .?yiiY. \.M?BI •., ...Y'. i ,'e?..'. ow. ars ?Sr ,rn-ss
w9x o°oe AMR etoao 4®
_<J t;;w i `"` _ _ °-°, 1 wzaKa e.ss arsa w.w®s sya
0 X° _°.; $ -- ' r sue. g µ'.e5 r.uao as a-v
°c G e 1? .P .w ?° _.^J _'"'?.'.1 1,"'1 _ e ly.u•;r?y a*°!a .,v.-. t?, ; ,rv Mew aa'rswea?O'Da. to^
?1®? j(• i> • ® Q ® T `?,? '? i?! mr 7 ~ PT 0- _ / ® t _ ti "` !yT„r , `°°...a ?j? ;.® . ?.? ,?..?:® Ka®a
I' r
r : l ? mi ?7 socci A ?0 PARX AREA
wLI s.+w>A aa"9 7 A,
1 , ® d 7 <' t AALP4tc s 7 .?w ® ?` w^? k°° s a 7sw. n... r.... era e h-
-- JX7Y \ 4 , r ' - ! onw .n nom.
'S ;?r,Hata" r i7 °? . i " t r ' °?-'? ®e T °?' Ii1, as®swsn 9418 Ac.
31 •® / I 1s °- `'RR.RK ,t} CYR vIu / ?7,,'u ,' t ." _;? }g?,g L -+•, to _ g, i
Jrr,// 1...+rs
-- '° a3 of a s r' ( a ?b?(`, l ?''' m\ ?' AI : x'19 r4 \w'+ %p. , q
'Ir
alas Atrr r, \F Y'` It
h A` `'r i .. ' .»r t ??//
.....
^` 3 d ?Xltuaac yrfrc wk,
®'tiL \.. z_ r1's-e; r ??'v :?f??1? !!! ! y 4?. v.?.. l1 S?(?'1, _ - t ®®®®®
1?. ?• '? .P' I'' M- •/ 15<°'k } 5 `L'j ? &!. ®.? .n ®smm m.-®.?m..m
p ?, A{ J i
too
XZAtt4 a Afsoa4YIY.OK
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
LOCATION: NE4, SECTION 22
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 & AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted by
Advent Methodist Church requesting a rezoning of R-2 and agricultur-
al districts to a single public facilities district south of
the Westbury Addition along Lexington Av.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site abuts the Westbury Addition to
the north and west, an agricultural parcel of r:,pprox. 5 acres
and Patrick Eagan Park. to the south. The Le,;a_ngton Square develop-
ment is across Lexington Av. The Comprehensive Guide Plan design-
ates this area as R-l, single family, 0 - 3 units per acre.
The topography is quite flat with the highest areas being at
the 890 elevation and the lowest at 884. Off site to the south
and west the land drops off rather quickly towards the park.
The vegetation consists primarily of scrub grasses over a sandy
loam soil,
CODE COMPLIANCE: , The proposed church building and parking area
will be constructed in a phased approach. The first phase will
consist of the main worship area (7,500 S.F.) and parking for
92 cars at 10' spacing. City Code requires 1 space for each
3.5 seats based on capacity design. 300 seats will be provided
thus requiring 85 spaces. The northern one-half of the parking
Jot will be constructed with the initial development and the
remaining area will be graveled for overflow parking.
The building setback along Lexington Av is 70' and the parking
setback is 30', both within the code requirements of 50' and
20' respectively. -Ample areas to the north and west have been
alloted for future expansion. There will be no problem accomodating
setbacks and lot-coverage standards.
COMMENTS: Access to the church will be from a single 24' drive
from Lexington Av. The site distance appears good at this location.
A 12' wide-drop off area is provided on the northern most area
of this entry drive. A canopy will cover this area in a later
phase of development.
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The building will be a single story and consist of either cedar
or redwood. A wood frame struction will most likely be the con-
struction style, however, the architect wishes to use some brick
if the funds become available. Asphalt shingles will also be
used. At this point, no steeple is foreseen and the height will
not appear out of scale with the surrounding areas. Staff has
not seen building elevations as of yet.
A preliminary landscape plan has been provided and it illustrates
screening of the parking area from Lexington Av through the use
of plant material and an earth berm.
TOPOGRAPHY/DRAINAGE: This development is located west of Lexington
Av and south and east of the Westbury Additions. The existing
topography is relatively flat farmland draining in a westerly
direction. This proposed development is located within drainage
district "J", as depicted in Figure #l. Drainage from this proposed
development is to be directed into trunk storm sewer which eventual-
ly outlets into pond JP-9 (McCarthy Lake).
There are two alternatives available for the parking lot drainage.
First, the parking lot could drain to the east towards Lexington
Av where storm water would be collected in catch basins constructed
by this development and outlets into the ditch along Lexington
Av. This would require County approval. The second alternative
would be to drain the parking lot to the west in its natural
drainage pattern through Patrick Eagan Park to pond JP-9. This
would require the approval of the Eagan Park Commission.
UTILITIES: An 18" trunk watermain was installed under project
395-I and is located 20' west of the centerline of Lexington
Av, which will sufficiently service this project.
As part of the Westbury Addition, an 8" sanitary sewer lateral
was constructed and a manhole placed at the north property line
of this proposed development to adequately service this site.
It would be the responsibility of this development to extend
the said sanitary lateral from its north property line to its
south property line for f-uture service to parcel 010-02, located
directly south.
STREETS/TRAILWAYS: Lexington Av borders this proposed development
on the. east. 'This road is a County road and is presently planned
to be upgraded from a two lane rural section to a four lane urban
section in 1988. County approval will be required for the entrance
location onto Lexington AV.
It, will be the responsibility of this development to construct
an 8' bituminous trailway adjacent to Lexington Av.
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: A 55' half right-of-way will be required
to be dedicated for Lexington Av. In addition to all regular
10' utility easements adjacent to public right-of-way and 5'
drainage and utility easements adjacent to all lot lines, a utility
easement will be required for the sanitary lateral to be extended
from the north to south property lines of this proposed development.
In addition, a ponding and utility easement will be required
if the parking area is to be drained to pond JP-9. A 10' trailway
easement shall be provided adjacent to Lexington Av.
ASSESSMENTS: Re:
indicate the site
area storm sewer
commercial rates.
Description
;earth into the assessments regarding this site
is still responsible for the upgrading of trunk
and trunk area watermain from agricultural to
These are summarized on the following table:
Estimated 1986 Amount
Quantity Date
Trunk Area Water Upgrading 3.73 (ac)(1) $1,830(2) $6,825
Trunk Area Storm Sewer
Upgrading
Total
162,564 S,F,(1) $0.025{3} $4,065
$10,890
(1) Net Area
(2) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($3,020 - 1,190)
(3) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($0.075 - 0.050)
CONDITIONS:
1) The canopy area will require a Conditional Use Permit.
2)"The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as
soon as the overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
3) A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submit-
ted and not released until 1 year after completion. The
landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading
plan at the time of final plat.
3) A detailed grading and erosion control plan be submitted
for approval by staff.
4) This development shall be responsible for an 8' bituminous
trailway along Lexington Av.
5) Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering
report.
6) All utility & drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenc-
ed in the engineering report.
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
CONDITIONS (continued)
7) The costs of all sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer shall
be the sole responsibility of this development.
8) County approval must be obtained for the entrance to Lexington
Av prior to final plat approval.
9) County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained
for the parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval.
10) Minimum'setbacks & parking requirements shall be met prior to
building permit issuance.
11) This development shall assume the additional assessments
as defined in the staff report based on rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval.
12) This development shall be responsible to extend the sanitary
sewer to the south boundary for future development.
13) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
See
0
I'
1
? c}ztv??ay
s?
approximate scale . -
0
6, 7
7 86 -EO ? ?2u
895 5
x 46
2.3
3.5 !. JP 41 L.S.
-?.- t 888.3 r
?.5. i ?. J p 6J 1,f 887 0
_L2 899
!' H ?11 JP-3 1
844 BP 00
CITY
JP-I0 .? i JP-30
820.8 873.0
830.0 879.4
\5,. 5 J°f c RE J$5220
` 855 6
818 ° '` \ _,
830 JP-49 I
S.KO?GA?E i_..1 818.1 _?.--- _-.__
83b.0 $1
ti
IP-3 "3
8706
69 4 JP- 7 TC{, B3Q.0 ?. 3 NC : rr r 4
872,4 873.2.,8
-_ t` `5 $6,5 ' f27^ 8P-"3 J-$ d 1-7 p- JP-8
7 8740 819.2 8
874 5 fi 8300 N I
JP-29
926,0
945.0
5 -1
LP-44 76,0
LP-43 800 J ee
1 851.1 k-' ra P 28
PLACE
L 2 1 I 1,1 AID.
r ---1 ?({
JP-50
964.0
971.7 I
7b`4?
898, WALNUT
L .?,0 q >"' t
','.P S 1 7-^- -_ r; 3-1R84?
{
8004 ?z ?T ( I 87,8
I FI i .,fi r - N lJ
Bp-11 iY-39 sot-% _ _
E C I PARCEL
FIG.
c
_C- NN
c
T. • i
H4LL
V
oil 112
C- H I it
63 I
fan E v? 61
C-PP pia" 1
4 ?
§KOV0L i t C [:_1 Sri
65
27 i'415
Q?D
27" C `" a...b V FA?At;
44
3,A) A
_ w f
fjfj? gy d ' 2i
LA,
SUBJECT PARCEL
FJ +2
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTE
SANITARY
SEWER
approved: standar
plate
2
N
m
MASTER L
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 16, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: Two separate applications •.ave '.peen submit-
ted by the K. Charles Developr;nent Co;,orat:.on, The z '.rst being
a preliminary plat for a 17,620 sq. ft. retail strip center along
the southern side of Duckwood Dr and east of Krestwood La. The
other is a conditional use for a pylon sign and drive-thru for
a restaurant on the eastern portion of the building.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site is surrounded by CSC (community
shopping center) zoning on the north and east. To the west is
the proposed Hardee's Restaurant. it will be important that
the access points to Hardees and the subject site meet across
from each other. The area to the south is designated limited
business, just east of the First Bank Eagan. The land is flat
with little or no vegetation at this time.
SITE PLANNING & CODE COMPLIANCE: This plat will consist of the
retail area ± 2.1 acres and an outlot of nearly 1 acre to the
south. Two entry/exit points are provided, one along Krestwood
La and the other on Duckwood Dr. Both are large enough for east
vehicular movement and have good site lines. Most of the parking
will be- on the northern one-half of the site. A one way loop
road along the southern portion of the site will provide parking
for 29 cars and stacking for the fast food menu board and pick
up area. City Code requires one parking stall per 150 sq. ft.
in retail areas.- This 12,620 sq. ft. center will require 84
stalls. The fast food restaurant, a food fair type that will
include the Golden Skillet and a Dairy Queen, will not have a
separate parking area but use available stalls from the 109 that
are provided. The parking stalls are shown to be 10' wide and
both building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements.
Staff has recommended. that an easement between the retail area
and the outlot be created- to allow movement between the parcels
without going on Krestwood first, Also, that only one access
be allowed onto Krestwood from the outlot.
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The interior lighted pylon sign will be located west of the Duckwood
Dr entrance and must be placed 10' within the property line from
the widest portion of the signage area. This sign area will
be approx. 90 sq. ft per side and the height will be 20'.
COMMENTS: The building's exterior will be brown iron spotted
brick over concrete block with a concrete walkway in front.
Store front accents will be achieved through the use of anodized
aluminum - the color has yet to be determined. A rock faced
coping will continue around the entire building above the sign
band area. The signage will typically be ± 24". The back side
of the building will be 8" single score painted concrete block.
The gabled entry to the Food Fare area will be sky lighted
and serve as a major focal point. A tot lot will be provided
adjacent to the northern portion of the restaurant and will require
some form of safety barrier from the parking/road areas. A separate
trash area has not been shown, therefore, it is assumed that
all debris will be contained within the building.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: Because this site is rather flat, the grading
the applicant is proposing is certainly feasible. The final
grading plan the applicant submits for final plat approval shall
contain adequate erosion control methods in accordance with the
City's Erosion Control Manual.
This site lies within major drainage district D as shown in Figure
1. All downstream trunk storm sewer facilities within this district
are in place. No trunk storm sewer facilities are necessary
as a result of this development.
However, this development will- be responsible for extending
the existing storm sewer outlet from Krestwood La to their east
property line.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain of sufficient size,
capacity and depth exist within Krestwood La and Duckwood Dr.
This development will not require any utilities extensions.
STREETS-: Duckwood Dr borders this -proposed development on. the
north and Krestwood La borders on the west. Both streets are
City streets, Duckwood-Dr is classified as.a community collector
street and was constructed to City standards in 1985 under project
429. Krestwood La is classified as a local street also built
to City standards.-
The northerly access to this development from Duckwood Dr lines
up with Town Centre Dr 70 to form a four-way intersection. The
westerly- access from Krestwood La is far enough away from the
Duckwood Dr. intersection to provide safe ingress and egress.
However, staff recommends the Commission stay flexible and require
this development to work with the proposed Hardee's, across the
street, to line up their respective entrances onto Krestwood
La. Finally, staff recommends that the Commission allow only
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
one access to the proposed outlot because it wil not be wide
enough to support two accesses. Staff recommends this development
provide for a cross easement so that both the proposed outlot
and this development can share the westerly access.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate a 40
foot half right-of-way for Duckwood Dr and a 30 foot half right-of-
way for Krestwood La.
This development shall also dedicate a 30 foot utility easement
for the storm sewer extension.
ASSESSMENTS: This development
area storm sewer assessments at
of final platting.
will be responsible for trunk
the rates in effect at the time
CONDITIONS:
1) This development shall be responsible for extending the existing
storm sewer from Krestwood La to its east line.
2) This development shall be responsible for working with the
development across the street to line up their respective
accesses onto Krstwood La.
3) Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood La for the
outlot.
4) Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that
both the developed lot and future outlot can share one access
onto Krestwood La.
5) This development shall dedicate 40' & 30" half right-of-ways
for Duckwood Dr & Krestwood Ln respectively.
6) This development shall be responsible for trunk storm sewer
area assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final
platting,
7) The- pylon sign be located 10' within the property line and
subject to the one time sign ordinance fee of $2.50/sq, ft.
8) A detailed landscape plan on the proposed grading plan be
submitted demonstrating suitable screening and berming of
the parking areas.
9) An easement be created between lot 1 and the outlot to provide
road access -between the two parcels at, the time the outlot
is developed.
10)-Only one access be-allowed from Krestwood Ln into the outlot.
V-i
"Um a
f
is?dates
EAGAN CONVENIENCE
EAGAN MINNESOTA
a:
L. f a 11 of 19 85 t ,? t ion r --
of
approximately a 30-- 1 > _ t Roa' a
park/school site. v'sory rE _c ? a' a
which the City Counc'ml °timately a p ed. L luently, dire
with the school a ` - °' ct to survey th- an-' resolve c r
associated with W - '_'c_- to acquisition. C the parcel f
acquisition was to Y:;?e taken place in Deco 1
t1p ' tion the survey, it was noted that th rty 1
changed tly from the original proposal 1 °
reduced to aLtely 28 acres in size. These ti-)
tt _ f-- _ - ht- City was requiring ten acre,^r'
rE _ ' a _,i._d __, accomodate both the school
dE v lcpment. These revisior: _ unacc _ _
RE e tion t A ns did nc t
l=msh, 1 or tho
y the e .. c. Issior_o ail is
Drive or Trails End -d, which is y °or
acqu: ition, so Wescott Roao', h Cit
pE _f ._-1 a prc l' y Review of pos oad
ME_..ib ill n---. ; A least two c alts t
scho, " i u ".ty park '.ficantly.
-se of tt number of issue; !ave evolved ing the site, the
it ntendent of Schools, the cool district's E 't, ney, Direi
El ry Educ tion, school district architect, D:' ct
RE c rn and P' - Planner held a meeting to review the . i?
di i ltern__ _ l.v - J.
II ;reed at the _i
uat
rE vi d
of '.strict and t_'s - rk cilities 1
, indicated that t
of is,
wJ .a `'°e district's set-o'
as _ _ t -*,)n t ct and City was nc
qit ' °oned, Mr. inc -.ted that if th
greater than t, a lisp the City ,
the district 1 do so.
1
An i-I -i-ping wp- recently held with the landowne- to -°°ll
ad °l:i.. 1 prope_ -;,y to the City/school. Staff I
En ig Del , the implications k
1 iiscape Architect, Sullivan,
'e_ig__s to be 1 Distr-
r< S 1 1 be rro' „ni-.il t
d---L4 - C on T
th- vision will be able to r aview a neg.
In ion , n r%nnn ng 1.
di,
g
tv i c a, g t
si a Ler is ling to sell the
roadway alig -1 L11 questionable, but f t t' ;r rei to
favor an a' W L tie least amount f o:
nr )erty. ". 11,, f ` ..,. Sad,. ',E„ldent of Schor 1
d ich a exceed the C ° ',y's proposed pt a e
,' Lsh its park site objectives.
trict is requestir- the City -,ante n, 4third
in the cost of add! t ' onal pr( to 1 °°ould
am- it to approximately c id a kcal: c"' $13,500®
FOR iA .la T, rf AT
To review iscussed i) e
plan for t` / v -i4;e and to d°
fu _c _ iay be to acqu3
utor of m On
acv/js
2
1
't
-1SCrr;- rJ(? ?d `d,„,,l 7 • - 777 'S^r-r"-"•_..,
a V `r ` 1 F
f) yam{
( //
/??yu,r
jre *?Sv
??? ( \1 Ott ® ?Gv? A
his
` 3 i.,?y., -.,?..y ; '??•?? J _'^v-+--•' ??i i ?. i f Jt ?`\ \.J. 11 \?'' ,r d88..-..„ -f
lll •`
m i ' 111 ?.? ? ./..? Ton
il, 1w t^r°s^,e?
- not -77
A 1 'Fl' ? F
Wow
01
1 1 r?,
'?
\" •3 ?ir/ _.=?f] a'yi`" _ ?\?99 'L F J _ X 7'? n?i 7":\ \ g ? "-) >i-?( r. y. ??:
OWN,
INT "NA
;?Jo! Oil
?'}?'"_,
l j?+}y' p"` bs•?yq , it
' ... ?)i one
i
00.
MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT
At the December Planning Commission meeting the Commission requested
the Engineering Department to review how Wescott Hills Dr could
be extended. Staff studied the area with representatives from
the Parks and Planning Deptsto determine the most feasible exten-
sion of Wescott Hils Dr to the south. Staff's recommendation
for feasible alignments are shown on the attached sketch. As
it turns out, an alignment, through the Greensboro Addition is
not feasible for the fo surwing reasons:
1. Extremely diffic It topography
2. Large amount of I..nassessable frontage
3. Excessive amount of right-of-way acquisition
Instead, it makes more sense to extend Wescott Hills Dr easterly
and then southerly or extenc Trails End Rd southerly and connect
Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the
owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property.
The Engineering Dept will be<forwarding these feasible alignments
to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary
future street extension in this are.,
cc: Dave- Gabbert, Developer
Paul G:-iffin
Ken Vr aa, Director of Parks & Recreation
enclosure
4 tom„
. a m
70
r-- ! ? VV '., ,
C?i
AQ
"My
3ti 13
RAW
_ F 4-- `? I t d
I t" i `
1 ,
f? .>t
u 4
? t -'` f•, j ???\ >?.. ?/ f? ( ?? e r }'ll '-./ ?w t \ -!f/f _ r tCf ,?/
IN
71
rig k - 6!` 14 s., ,x r
w Vic. .fi ? -"'%-? ??? ?.;'` e^` i ? '?, _ _. ti m_"?-.Yti "?, ? •i'? ?.y '` ? 4 ., y,f.'t'` k
a 541! f v""?x? \,,)? )??, ?-._.-'.??' ,; rFi^ 1d'? `% '?¢?a„??"'^`^x Yi ..`C.?'n ,y?y;•..""" ii,i S? t ?k ?tG?.?.
-WAS
40
t FlJ .% ?; -X_ ?S .f/ 7 .\` _ 'A y R *e. i F 4=3
` ?? t ? r "- ? -+ .. ?? s?il S? f .?..-..ft? 9 ?'A1 ?1,?'??+? r l ?- ., 4•i ?t S ? ?t t t '`???i i 4.7,
i*f. ?1 ? i .:.,y??rar/??'?? ?1.- .? ?'ti'y' ? :_,.' 'N..L'.>-si"?,j'{ ? '•. ?» '?,? ?,.1 ??:''A? t' °a`"' ? f,
'y- ?_ p ar t? '_ _ J t ??,Y?`K?1?, 1?? {?'`3?(il• °/*" f??a. s> `?? l.p_ ???i"?a .(7- '1?? ?p?'.
7 •-?-__ j t s? l6? .7 ? .7 ? S'': r'. ?1 'S?'?k'? ?n.r '?" ? Lt ?{L i ?s e.
son
??, , ? •, ? _ \? °'. f'_"'" ?`'_-' \ /?:} -- ``?' ? { :? W"''it"T L' hJ.,?r `" m?.? ? ?1? ' k,? $ 1j ?f ?? }r .Jtiyt ? d •d(?
t.'°w Y
? fil
.t
. +`, e-*7
Avow
/'fr ^.r 1 ?a
r x ."°sa?a g atyg#'1 ; t .' ti11f t`ijbc?+:Lt#dltr'.,._.,a'X Kts?r
MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986
SUBJECT: ADDS, TO GREENSBORO PEELIMINARY PLAT
At the Decemb the Commission requested
the Engineer Wescott Hills Dr could
be extended. ith representatives from
the Parks a: the most feasible exten-
sion of We Staff's recommendation
for feasib] -he attached sketch. As
it turns c ie Greensboro Addition is
not feasibl
1. E?
2. L ontage
3. 3 y acquisition
Instead, it makes more id Wescott Hills Dr easterly
and then southerly or extend Tra..L_ End Rd southerly and connect
Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the
owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property.
The Engineering Dept will berfc:r arding these feasible alignments
to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary
future street extension in this areae
cc: Dave-Gabbert, Developer
Paul Griffin
Ken Vr_aa, Director of Parks & Recreation
enclosure
1
&+ cr - ri ri -
d. a v h- t
Advisory a
several 1ssio
> _.ndum was a'- to th€- C
ov 3 also rev M-,-Jr r
1{ b' ; that the t
discuss, at work t r
T'ke n? .4. o. Parks u
11, Prairie, 11
of Blaine, me for near- r 11 da; 1
2e and the relationship it has with exi: t 'ate 1
s. It is not the in'-. - nt of th g _ - )r° - to re '
I at this rnppfiraz°, T° i.c it i-. f
ere c le
°: . S
v p. v , 4 t t
70 ''is Y
that .., ^ks dedical
a 'a
°ovi
3) Z '°it 's Dmmer 1f
av".es for credit where there are sini"°h
p s ana open space.
It still a. that Eagan°s parks ded" °Duld,
1" 1 e better compl--
- ti
e r' ieref ore, s' be nevi "r
U_ i,ivris.
1
It must be rec v z i of th - i he stren t.
ordi: z dedic< -' ,
bE Y the r
it- ___able j Witt aui a t
it 1 uscepti`le to ,-urt shall
STATUTE
At i statute Whit ly all Gies 9
aid dedication
t t: c ,
wr ch are C•
p".,m tion iy p_'r . V.-__O-- _dic_-._
dedication, t lea, t ., should be "t ased on t- a f ii 4
the land no later ie time of the final api 'c "a
municipality reasonably d 1es that it will need t th portion
of l<^'^-' for the purpobt _d,""
In the t' eitical
or-, _;
Perh-,;3 one significant court case-- )arks dedication
is Kool:ts vs. the City of Bloomington in Which the Court upheld
Bloomington and that its 10% 1,= id I ` on W a bl
Cc ;equently, any communitie 1
ce ;°)n in <'o this 10% "t e ._
tratE t, is rea
`re and
3ecau
info
be'. Tutu _1 --id __v__ k , 6 < '
act ties, a r borhood par's at 'ar_, th- i_ °elquality o'
City to acs Lire for parks purposes and has defined parks
as - pencl.' locati t a , t`a C'
e ce11 1fi4-., 4-
Would t. t
System; P ng ur
p_ a- F r, City ha-
is us u 1 tioxa, LU would then seeu.
ea its 1-®®d cash) t=-_ed on population
a c .velopment.
l 11
A of 10% '.e
®
M
B ' i ' 14v 4 , w
f, c
ve'-- ct
I_ Auld n' for 1 1.c
, on a 11 --ale W'- inc ..H. y ,
.act, for prov parks i v W va _i, t- '-- t
'C P
Sta` a° na-e t,,*,? qT
"fad .A r t
accept
c llectively, ra
v! It also app
..d vision plat '___' lue.
2
that the y of ' history of setting values for parks cash a.tion
that is c E t land ? 'es is an appropriate me thodology. f e,
staff v a recc ad that t rrocedure continue, but that the cc
.7,34 --t to 6;hv,, 1 gy us
,' OF T
°Thro z h the City' : ,. .
- nd
fe^i' "-y
w, v
needy d a
st _ - d of 15 -f 1 borhood r c and c er
popu' ';ion of 1,000 persons is an applicable ; !ndard, .P ly
twelve acres of this 15 acre amount shall ce - u' tborho 3 and
shall be the minimum standard established by t Y.
TI ?ef ore, the City shall requi 1. 1
,Lc,. aunt 3 s 11
Ue 1" c .. c u u.i.i 1
Ur.-
Single family - 3.5
T' le - 2,8
Quads - 281
- 1.9
area per p
3
° 1<
on c proper
zoning v 1i.. This .1 1 shall be as follows:
Irv
DT C
_j
4
.i e 1' y p< ly,
cu -Iant v ? , °A 1
sir R.:e fair 1 g ..a adult
from single y es.
A 1 t I "' and D-` into consi deratic'-, 5+° 3-0
___t l family _ dE t lly more c
t il`°ip1 family reside Y7
3 ntage of lane"
C t 1 less than to
T'e inc land dedication
straight 10% " ind dedication reardle: f ire.
CASH DEDICATION
Th cash ded° calculate is v similar t
ly f t
g?
un tv.
is 4?, ll4 g
100 pop tit I. I-A b d'
units per 10 3 _-nu' ation. The otl v been that t Cit
us' g 12 1,000 popul, `pion a ^'. Util3
per 100 pc .,ation 1 s. ,,,?? ra
w y c ih equiv_l .e.s 13
tb 0 population, qual a 1
unit.
b
r c.., be 11 ,.,2.-0 unit. ally
5
I '.1ity for t y by prow
a L v f - "- value c wt, property
IAL/
C
... B".a
-ad:* - ledication
whicl, oping.
I ,-. _ p -
nue as it k , but
6
The Special T _c o
t
_ t
f .
1 e ?q
appropriate t co
1 _1 guidelines ror st t L so
ta41 ae and place for pre--r4-- ; M.
" D discussed relative t, he
ty.>e volunteer/c( t Lbt ion made I
th ims being rep fc:
i` only a ° . .
it the s ;tee's`
of which staff 3 to d i®.ch is t most apps 3 t for
effo rt and extent of contribution.
1. A plaque This is intended for long-standing vol a
significant nature.
2. C- - For an or n , ,i who participate in a
3. logos plt rord "vo ith staff L.
to
6. - Embroidered fa-,r _c patch generally I
hr aff discretion : 1.
a. Pins - pP?_. --- -- with lapel c
designed 1,__.
6. Pens - `. logo.
7. Mu-z! - rvs.;1A "impartment logo.
Q
8 . S "
°'T1 rr
Re ' volunteers st ild be a ly admin
requi =s a minimum of recor Ln. Sto age of items
i tventorsy of objects rec gnif icant story r > was aii c
acretion to award is th- 1 gal Pc i en vj; ¢ ` Qi-,aff to
a? as of individual performs 1i_- as '®. will
;e of the individual and the Qn , - L
xsw , ly
that would be most appropriatA. ae 1 c item is not as important as
the appropriateness to age, SE I t
The scene of r,_ :c -,'I_n '_so dM c d nd it w?c
most appropriat,c ' °^ly fur , woulu I
of events. It w, that Volunteer F
April, individuals mi b- -.nvited to _ Fission met
repo ized« Final' y, significant cant I ' c as would
recd, ion Co "s or City C so
s L'.z,c,, I t t h cs n'' V I- t
to be
As 'ied 1
14. r__s d .I L , e
1 t t 1, __d _i___ r
d€v_ c I to a] -cificall,, 1: DlunteE Ignition P t
subcommittee felt that the rew and benefits far excea ld the ost and
repre )o r ' ue for the { ient»
To re h c , c
pu-c' C_
which ld p c j buds o" v ii ,cc iitior I - nt
Respectfully submitted,
U U.L r recreation
KV/ js
DRAFT
W "?P 15, 1986
TF C C r c
PT Theo ns are ill-advised at tt
safe b_kcycle tra y." s is evident now and this need oPr_l, Tne®
population of the County bases.
Frc a transpo: makes -ease to "ve a..+ ..,;, 1
_ JLl ,J V i ,, ,
?nnect t Couni i l:
to bet to work, .c,g centers, anu to use
If Dakota County an extensive, well-coor, t i s
ounty would bE c to in A
-ety is an 'on. '
ha it c i oads. r roa(
allo_. for taw sa fe , ssage oi -)icyclists. _sA_?refoz e, a
system for b' yelists is . >ry. Apparent c ` f att:
of plans r m hunty level Sias an importe 4. 4- on the pla
level. E ? plans for trails have ' the Cit.
acX°rdanee w.ich County plans. Any drastic .-- This 1-te
all the id money used to produce 1
to of
Last, .. w l'
& Re; d
ion
KV/js
T11 e*
C ping ?$
needs. The Mi. _) :sota co
recreation providers such J_.
0. L L )L ation and data will also by
h Minnesotans.
Y ap3
r
L
.. ..,' .s e
Opp
?
pp}}
gg??
..ty ?. _ hai
/L,C.M or ve"
.lities, _' ution st ?
c ant's C c on Minr ;
p =d. Ao i ddress tr- -
m
o expand pportuni
°c r
a: to plan for recreational oppo t). =s for j tic
nr '0
1 .iv
To )i )ve _p ve the letter of support and interes
pr oviding( recreation and all services and opportuni i
f ure n c"
- )ectfg. i.
®c (ion
KV/hb
tg for
's and
1
wor ?' • ?m° v ~ to
the,
nstr;
r »imat 1 tw pros r
t Hill Pa k ? ..
ase the a Thane selected was ver simile t the roof
I for the c '1E ^ park structures, direr t v - _ to the 1
rm to proceea with additional refin i deve of cost
pr jections .
ai will revs
ding .? r i
,"-.e arch _s ects have done a s takeol a of t 1
`ht' certaii l j morQ
„?t 15 rt a< f- . t
- - - :. t ro
tares oll
P C® ._-
arm Park Pavilion $106,000.00
iris Shelter 82,0-0.00
Hill gr,.rr 8n?
;F view
y
Y +30,000-00
Set
7
w t,
c
uilk t If-'3e
f•
c
3 are 3 d ana x
1
. r v
1
,here .ll be
Ae F. c r_a d.,duc c. _.,:ria l
ypes cxx
'
ux v i. x
buil,' ° i roc' sill be rec°- sted.
ld also b ate 1
t„ a bid as -r ,+ 4
pail-I-)n, alth
is fly c -1 i mi '1 ry
co c this si '.d be id =.d .
As s will gall, the PnI
she or th D ring f'c the she 1
fund Provic cimately $318,0-
$1001- .0' t
Fa--
at T
th ®tion __ut
v,^10. _ i 1'.4,0, .0- r
avail (This she fall does not include the $30,000.00 tt ' l he
three smaller shelter buildings.)
At the October 3rd meeting of the Cox i? , i the poten it
?ortfall with an anticipated cc is 0
i >430,000.-O. Several It
1-1 1"4" , Committe-
A 1 :: al state,
,ok no formal _.mc , it r
f could be made from three >b e 1) ')ond
cy (associated with these individua,t ps e) c t.auction cost
fhe sprincr 1985 park contract 3) and i-, u. b?
:nt the c
ite fund.
Alt9 ___v be 'I ')le doll t' continency
real,' f f ',,5 cc.. the fu 1 ' this sc
thi not y _ known. not an
to le 'e action fir i dd thei e, w
f.0 r -m the und. F•
ox$ s aw ,
cost o
:ertainty ( n
with parks deve-_pment, 7taff is recommending the entire )unt b,
from the Park Site Fund.
2
FOR C-" P r -TION
To appro approve support.v€ for t k buildings
the Park i e Acquisition and Development Fund o 145,000 to mal t
tr ;fr
3
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986
RE: CONCEPT PARK PLAN REVIEW - COST PROJECTIONS
Consultant Parks Planner, Tim Erkkila and City Parks Planner/Landscape
Architect, Stephen Sullivan, have begun to develop final plans for five parks
to be under construction this year. As with last year's spring construction
contract, this year's phase development work will include all utility work,
grading, seeding, sodding, roadways, parking lot and trails. Additional
surface development will be coordinated the following year.
Several revisions have been made to the preliminary park plans previously
prepared as part of the Park Systems Study. These revisions are a result of
the need to balance earthwork, utilities, etc. as well as recognizing changes
over the last year or two. At the meeting, staff will review with the
Commission concept plans as prepared. Approvals will be sought to proceed
with final grading plans and construction documents. The Commission will have
an opportunity to review final plans at the March meeting.
Staff has also prepared preliminary cost projections based on preliminary
concept plans. To further emphasize, these are cost projections which will be
refined after approval by the Advisory Co,rission based on final grading plans
and unit cost estimating. The cost projections are based on work expected to
be completed under the contract. Staff has also prepared cost estimates for
some of the future work projected at each park site. Also listed is funding
available under the parks bond fund. These figures, both projection and bond
fund do not estimate costs associated with any design, engineering or provide
for contingency. They are presented as a basis of information for the
Advisory Co + fission.
Projected cost figures will be refined and presented in greater detail at the
March Commission meeting as the "engineering estimate" for work to be
completed. This estimate will also have a breakdown for "future" cost
considerations as well.
PLAN REVIEWS
Staff is not able to provide you with reductions of the concept plans. These
will be presented in large scale to the Commission on Thursday. Briefly,
however, the following changes or revisions have surfaced at each of the
following parks:
Meadowlands - Orientation of the ball field has been shifted slightly to
better align with the remainder of the park and fit grading contours. The
roadway and parking lot have been shifted and slightly lengthened to bring the
park user deeper into the park and closer to facilities. Two tennis courts,
previously depicted, were taken out of the parks bond fund and therefore,
removed as part of the concept planning. Members will take note that
preliminary cost projections exceed the bond fund amount.
L wnic unaerc t the DO]
,J
its time
fs lity. T ing lot and pm d fut
relocat c° the hockey fa( ° _ies on t
park d2° 'n complicates
the p t ,ti west. T Y -
ground ion t
3caus'' •° 3-
not
th-
Pilo oncept design for this park has been s(
rest-- oa c'_e lac__ -)f information on the orthern Net 1 C
p.3 pA" ' , .%.;a a a sects .cross a wrc t i r' t" 'A-k. I -
pip r elatively shallow rid Ill L antld
hat can take place l t =.sult, r
e yaks p viously p >e' 1 3t ta:
t -a have b n area c r: cant
t_. l ___ort o• - l iaterial.. w_, . -irst de
i ted _h t over 10,0 3 yards of b< ow will be
cc t . C to tly, c' € 3tion is given to th(
pr D ev3 a t --or - view by the Advis+ y
thL 6• lt.r. A to by vIc>' nd the preferred altk,
as ti final _ 3-n.
<
• . T' r
..a . _ to _ - l
S - 1 9
i_
1l
TI°
Ad _V offered s t °i 'c 1 its development _ r use
as fl-i the par]-.
'S
Blume C? , i/Blu Shield
Conn an1Gi _ -,will
- - " -id
Pilot _'
South Oaks
TOTAL:
Bond Fund:
a ..
J
TOTAL:
Bond Fund
TOTAL:
Bond Fund
$1c", 300
$227,500
$ 100,000
$198,600
t o
t.1a3,000
$120,000
68,000
$133,000
KV/js