Loading...
02/06/1986 - Advisory Parks & Recreation CommissionAG ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION CO $ ION EAGAN ® MINN TA EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 7:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 6, 1986 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. INTRODUCTION - NEWLY -APPOINTED COMMISSION MEMBER 3. ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1986 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: a. Chair b. Vice -chair c. Secretary 5. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS a. Stuarts First Addition - Stuart Nolan b. Bur Oaks Hills - Harstad Co. c. Advent United Methodist Church d. K. Charles Development 6. OLD BUSINESS a. Park/school site acquisition - Section 14 b. Park dedication review c. Volunteer & contributers recognition - committee report d. Park location - Section 21 (Motions to defer to future meeting) e. Draft letter - Dakota County Bicycle Trails Plan 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Road name b. 1986 budget - distribution c. Letter of support - Presidents Commission on American Outdoors 8. PARK DEVELOPMENT a. Park shelter buildings b. Park Concept Plan review & cost projections 9. OTHER BUSINESS & REPORTS a. Update storm sewer 10. ADJOURNMENT provements - Rahn Park - City project 452 It .t i ^y Commission ill be A"'-- all to Orde -1 the 1 intro? L, q of the newly- - L i. r, Mr. '( lc ing adoptia .r the approval of i a rf t°°, s- will I, ' -lection of '. a _.,r or to t' n of off , i' -aid b f( set its st e' committees. . . _ y t,_ - The ly c adle 1 a iue. Its t iately of O'Leary Pa _o. is is g a cas- ration al __ with i " ity of a t L xixa6 .,:, Thi0 . oper should also c,," a tot 1'' The seco __ s Bur C k Hills d by Harstad S o, v r - .. y E r 1 The third item is I t Unite, Ihr ' Bch p' - :r This _iurch ( v ® opment i 3 y a 14 t E-- Pa-'rr ff is that dE 01 °11 _.1.uirem aperty L, ton AN ,y of thiw lament Pr-p---' _ e -'r a 'acility .._ 1 Lve -'lot Knc Road. Staff i r cas] ation r c OLD "u, Staff 1 t g ' 1 Old Bu _'he fir wLll fin fi t meet-*.,- e site. It under i- th- 1 S : cn 21. as deferred from tha r meeting Staff i ` Cerre because of the lend _; d Bu_' is a draft l titter p sory Co i is to r v _o be in- in local p r°s prio Plan 1 three i nd( 3us' l s. the f s an is: _ from tU - City C } d. TI.., 1986 City budge t has been complete, = comp l d, Copies o_ _ad et will be distributed to members of the Adv -'y C ®s `.on. TI nal ite rn New u ss is a letter of .)port n- J .. '_ C-_ _n A_- C--tdoors. A -mmo 3 _ tl^ fc-, 4_w. C 1 cc ' at the of ° ° we --- f--113 _ iitbed, Director of Parks Recreation KV/js 2 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MIMES OF A RMEETING THE ADVISORY PAW'S! ?g?RECREATION CO ,? EJ G , pAff-H- NNESO1 JANUARY 9, 1936 AGENDA Commission member Bertz moved, Alt seconded, the agenda be approved with t- two add-ons to "Other Business." The motion earrid.. MINUTES OF DECI . ER 5, Commission member Carroll moved, Kubik seconded, .he minutes be appran v ed as presented. The motion carried. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT P.D. - DAVE G BERT I IV. 'h & Rec. Cc T'u M O, t3?4 P± RENICK ADDITION - MARK REMICK Parks Planner, Stephen Sullivan, su_?ested moving 'te n.uu t<<? 1 u" .he DEERWOOD WHOM - IND. SCH. DIST. 196 SILVER BELL I, DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - OFFICE WAREHOUSE The developers are proposing a 102,000 sq. ft. warehouse similar to the R.L. Johnson warehouse. The building would have interior loading bays and the proposal is adhering to the landscape policy. Commission member Carrall moved, seconded by Fedde, the recommendation to accept cash dedication. `'h motion carried. Adv. Parks & Rec. Comm. January 9, 1986 FEBRUARY PROPOSALS OLD BUSINESS CI LANDSCAPING POLICY The landscaping policy was approved at 'a joint meeting of the City Council and Advisory Planning Commission and is now being implemented. PARK SYSTEMS UPDATING DAKOTA COUNTY BIKE I VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION Sacs OBTLES RAHN PARK - STORM SEWER PROJECT 13 dv Pa 7. R', d snu rr;y ?', 1 ? r> Consensus of the Commission was a preference to have Pond AP-49 byp altogether. If that is not possible, then the engineers should pick a roe which would have minimum impact on the trees. Public Works Director C;olb said he would include Commission concerns in his review of all proposed alternates for the storm sewer system. PARKLAND STUDY - SERVICE SECTION 21 This item was deferred to the February agenda. PARK DEVELOPMENT FINALIZATION OF I.C. 85-1 - SPRING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT This report was included in the p ket. The Dir r ;" '' n r j- u reviewed significant aspects of th report ire?' ca L Y -, ins , that will be made. The report c ,ntcd tbo C c _ Ina . j_c A w l changes given. CONSTRUCTION UPDATE - LIGHTING CONTRACT Stephen Sullivan said that lights would be on at the Goat Hill and ?s d? ci.iPP rinks on Friday, January 10. He explained the problems which ca.auses a itiay in having the lights on sooner. 1986 SPRING CONSTRUCTION - TIME LINE Director Vraa reviewed the time line included in the packet and was :+ss3Fci to be coordinated with Commission meeting dates. Members reviewed the dates and accepted the time line. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES - PARK SHELTER BUILDINIGS This item was deferred to the February meeting. OTHER BUSINESS JOINT MEETING - JANUARY 28 This item was deferred to the. February agenda. ROUND TABLE Commission members had an opportunity to `r` 3 tb r aIaI concerns they would like to have addressed. ;.,ll ?s a toss bi°ought up: 5 SCOTT MORGAN Intern Scott Morgan was hired as a recreaisi. n supervisor for in California, He will live in Indio, Ca 11. fornia and s : Iii a _ s early in February. Commission members e ?n?r?d Scott on `;' nc 1s_d for Eagan. OIL- PROPER - UPDATE The City Council authorized staff to make an offer to the owner of the 15-acre parcel. Director Vraa stated that if more land cannot be obt-t_ !.ned fie: m the Ohmanns, the 15-acre parcel will become a neighborhood park and an athletic site will be selected elsewhere. SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 School District 196 Community Education Advisory Council wishes to have a representative from the Eagan Parks & Recreation Commission. Sandy Bertz volunteered to be Eagan's representative. SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 The school district will share in the cost, of equi rc -cI, '..'o, be installed at Pilot Knob Park/school amounting to approxa.ina tely $6,000. JOUR Commission member Carroll made the motion, seconded by Bertz, to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor. Time of adjournment was 11:00 P.M. Dated: Advisory Parks & Recreation Secretary 6 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: STUART'S FIRST ADD (Stuart Nolan) LOCATION: TOMARK 2ND ADD, NW4, SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 15, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval for the Stuart's First Addition. The plat consists of 144 apartment units on 9.5 acres (2 outlots), east of Lexington Av & west of Carriage Hills Golf Course. ZONING & LAND USE: The site is zoned R-4 multiple and is surround- ed by the same zoning on all sides except for an agricultural lot along the SW property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designated this area as R-III, density 6 - 12 units per acre. Golfview Rd will be continued to the west and meet Lexington Av directly across from Town Centre 100 Rd. The applicant has an option on the land north of this road extension. This area contains a ponding area and is quite low in relation to the existing Lexington Av, which is scheduled for improvements in 1988. The subject area is rolling grassland and has little or no mature vegetation. SITE PLANNING: There are two, (2) buildings proposed, each contain- ing 72 units and underground parking. One additional 10' parking stall _has been provided outside thus meeting Code requirements in terms of size and numbers. These buildings will be connected by a covered walkway to a centrally located recreation building. This building will contain a sauna, whirlpool, spa, excercise room and possibly an indoor pool. A tot lot will be provided near the recreation building. O'Leary Park, across Lexington Av, will contain tennis courts when the parks development takes place. A secondary loop service drive will connect the parking areas and provide emergency access to the recreation building area. This -drive will have knock-down bollards at the parking lot point. The buildings and parking areas meet or exceed all City setback and coverage requirements. STUART'S FIRST ADD PAGE 2 JANUARY 28, 1986 COMMENTS: The tentative project name will be`Carriage Crossings'. These apartments will be made of 100% brick with redwood gables. This style should be quite compatible to the surrounding area. The apartments will be marketed as a higher income rental project. Extra amenities include: fireplaces in some units, larger more usable balconies and easy access laundry facilities in addition to the enclosed recreation building features. The interior con- struction will include staggard stud walls and gypcrete to help eliminate typical apartment noise as much as possible. Tentative rent prices will be approx. $575, $675 and $775 for 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units respectively. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan that the applicant submitted is feasible and within City Codes. Although the grading operations will disturb almost the entire site, there is no substantial vegetation or trees that the grading will affect. Staff recommends the applicant review his grading plan in the area between the tot lot and rec building to provide better positive drainage to the north. As it is now, water will stand in this area. Also, the grading done on this development shall not adversly impact the existing from the County's culvert under Lexington Av and the private culvert under an existing dirt road at the SW corner of this proposed development. The County will probably replace the existing culvert with the upgrading of Lexington Av in 1988. The grading plan, as proposed, shows filling of up to 8' over existing sanitary sewer line along the easterly portion of this proposed development. The existing cover is about 10' presently, making the total proposed fill over the pipe about 18'. While this depth approaches the maximum fill height over the PVC sanitary sewer pipe, staff does not feel this should pose any problems because the depth is still within the allowable limits for backfilling over PVC pipe. Prior to the grading operations and until the completion of the restoration over this site, this development shall install adequate erosion control measures to prevent the depositing of sediment within existing City storm sewer lines in Golfview Dr or within the existing low area in the SE corner of this proposed development. This development is located within drainage district "D". The existing and future runoff will be toward the north and eventually into pond DP-10. Project 443 (O'Neil pond) will provide the gravity outlet from pond DP-10 downstream through DP-5 and DP-4. The downstream system from DP-4 is currently in place all the way to the Minnesota River Valley. As a result, this development will not require any trunk storm sewer construction to accommodate its runoff. STUART'S FIRST ADD PAGE 3 JANUARY 28, 1986 UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, capacity and depth are in place adjacent to this property to provide service to it. The sanitary sewer may be extended from the end of the existing Golfview Dr westerly within Golfview Dr. The applicant can also extend the existing 8" water main within Golfview Dr westerly and connect into the existing 18" water main on the west side of Lexington Av to complete the watermain loop within this area. At the writing of this report, it is the developer's intention to proceed with the installation of public utilities and streets under a private contract. The developer must submit plans and specs prepared in accordance with City standards for review and approval prior to final plat approval. STREETS: Lexington Av (Co. Rd. 43) abuts this development along the west and Golfview Dr is stubbed to the NEcorner of this proposed development. Dakota County Hwy Dept maintains jurisdiction over Lexington Av, which is presently a two lane rural section roadway. Dakota County proposes on improving Lexington Av to a 52' wide minor arterial collector street in 1988. Golfview Dr is an existing residential City street. This development proposes to extend Golfview Dr westerly to Lexing- ton Av. This intersection will be directly across from Town Centre 100 Dr. TRAILWAYS: Because of the designation of Lexington Av as a minor arterial roadway, City policy will require a trailway along both sides of Lexington Av. The trailway portion adjacent the westerly border of this property will be the responsibility of this develop- ment. Because the actual installation of this trailway will not be until 1988, staff recommends this development prepay for the trailway installation as referenced under the assessment paragraph. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining the following permits prior to final plat approval. 1) MPC sewer extension permit 2) Mn Dept of Health water main extension permit 3) Dakota County Hwy access and work within County right-of-way permit RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends this development dedicate the full 60' right-of-way for the Golfview Dr extension on the final plat. The previously platted Tomark Add provided for a 55' half right-of- way for Lexington Av. This width should be sufficient for the upgrading of Lexington Av to 52' in the future. However, because STUART'S FIRST ADD PAGE 4 JANUARY 28, 1986 of the potential grading required to rebuild Lexington Av, staff recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent the westerly boundary of this proposed development. Staff will require increasing the easement over the existing sanitary sewer to 30' centered over the sewer line because of the additional fill proposed by this development. Because the easterly parking lot for building #2 will be encroaching the sanitary sewer easement, staff recommends that the applicant enter into an agreeement with the City whereby the applicant will agree to pay for any parking lot and trailway restoration necessary if the City has to repair the sanitary sewer line in the future. ASSESSMENTS: The City assessment records indicate that for outlots A & B of the Tomark 2nd Add, all trunk area related assessments for water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer are either levied or pending with the exception of lateral benefit from trunk water main. This development will be responsible for the lateral benefit from trunk water main as illustrated in figure #2 along its westerly boundary at the rate in effect of final platting. In addition, staff recommends this development prepay its multi-family rate for Lexington Av future improvements along with the future trailway improvements. The following table summarizes the assessment responsibilities for this development. Assessment Summary Est'd 1986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Lateral Benefit from 480 f.f. $11.88 $5,702 Trunk Watermain Lexington Av 480 f.f. $63.36 $30,413 Trailway 480 f.f. $11.81 $ 5,669 .Total $41,784 All costs associated with the installation of the public improve- ments will be the sole responsibility of this development. CONDITIONS: 1) The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if only 2 stalls per unit are provided with this project. 2)_ Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment regarding-park dedication. 3) •A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and a bond not to be released until 1 year after landscaping is completed. 4)_ Golfview Dr shall be extended out to Lexington Av. STUART'S FIRST ADD PAGE 5 JANUARY 28, 1986 5) This development shall not adversly impact any existing drainage patterns with its site grading. 6) This development shall loop the existing 8°' watermain within Golfview Dr to Lexington Av. 7) This development shall be responsible for obtaining the neces- sary permits from MPCA, MN Dept of Health & Dakota County Hwy Dept. 8) This development shall grant the City a 20' slope easement adjacent Lexington Av right-of-way. 9) This development shall dedicate a 30' easement over the existing sanitary sewer line and enter into an agreement to pay for restoration of parking lot or trailway where either encroaches upon the City's easement. 10) This development shall dedicate a full 60' right-of-way (outlot C) for street purposes. 11) This development shall be responsible for lateral benefit from trunk water main and prepayment of its multi-family equivalent for Lexington Av upgrading and also for the trailway construction. 12) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. r l4 Jr D'LEARY PARK--- as K0?5T E } -? =k ) , E AIL EK ?? OCRESf A .. ,• {.? ARK \t ,. •?m+1wr W w?+kw+W+W w?r?+? !fL^ ?Cfj R-4 A A, r ? F r f?S p { GAP OEN R-4 A 0 IM/ tf ai l7 I- z J 4 a a z 1 Q r t4 1 t is proposing to develop the South Del :ills P.M. (: 11 0 1cs Pa' ) nto 204 single family r' 'dential lc T'ie Sot k D-l- Hills P.U.O. previously proposed bott - -1 -, and tw: Lg with a P.M. c : gent to provide parklanc' dedicatior king apprrm_imately 28 This devc , c t dedicated. The Advisory C shoal' ;ermine if the proposed changes it dedication are rble <s :d or require revision. HISTORY - Svc 72" T e -story of par - in tt - u s ri_ ill hi '-l -t some of the me ,e tra( kg the hilt .)arks 7o 3,1 to tt the -ity firs .9 . , on for z° m M.D. for the - e- as South Del- parcel was sorr- Ll r a lr.t is now cony c h a-s) considerEi re rent i 'ch was part of Inv - i it appli tzon fi 1976 -1 12277, . ` P ssibilit rec ily a:°c 7. i five acre tas fl d c 'sle fc In Octob " of 11177, ' Crov 1't- A_, zo within it ty c_ °'t '.ic` 1 t l no ac.. m J. the P.U.D. 'n ? ugust f 1979, th _ 'dvi y ?arks Score o l recommended, and was o by the develo , to provide i t of app oximately 2- crew Al io d prouiG T+,n for a tr° -a ?1a - 1-k acre with.' d v t c I fc i semi - of pi. lie ' ?- ie Advisory a °. visory Parks Recreation Cc issio--; f ti conside r t c -ur__ Oaks on the c ?v o_,er, 'edict l 1 28 '' p__ City bal.. ( v rea. P.U®D, 1 II I ;ion, of the 10.3 acres above the high water line the l , as 2.9 acre .ten size and only six acres has slopes of less than 14%. 2 In rev- - p irk concept pro.% led with the eliminary pla the follc c _ .meats: (See att "Devel ar ark Propc ). 1) soccer and ball fields ar( c 9 tely ov, ,7 operly oriented, ortic exten(' =refore, its useful' 2) lct is lo b .,,,._a t -n single family just regv- its. Staff is concerned wit' r ' atial c jecti( to park usag - once these `-c ecome occupied. 3) - - --- ,.n pl- , M? '' -- „va ttea l _o ee t l' d n a 3 s to a In order to complete the ne proposes to build a series or E i length and at places, up to ..' 1- psychologically separates the open spat ?rved om the park and relegates it to an unusable area. doubt @er retaining walls will save the adjacent oak r 3ould be e entually lost because of dirt"-bance a---)ciate~' 4) The pro t °ailway aroun _ akE elevatior f 820 with 13 lot location and -" > flooding. 5) The proposed tennis courts on _ art _ corner bec, fill ar( requires a retaining wall to f cilitate 't. 6) The props om, f Dr the 4C , 1 y rzr" f re,- lo- ocont s1" wi ' disf v wi o parks pl px t clos( a ty -field to ritial lots. In response to the developer's parks plan and to meet tl l s't ed, s'': s , ?epared e d I k desi ( °« T,__ f' A. T' ,1 relationsh" ion from zz`; o ° is o t (,-ld need to r p_ part o" y with five resid atial lots. equiv t to tely 1.5 acres. Other recommendations for consid an incl 1) v-,-r-- re°-p• ')le for gradinr, and restoru,ion of the area for c_r n 2) That the pro; the lake b f ° in the 820 contou?. 3) The 1 ng fingerlike projection on the east tde propose de ° i (part of the William Bros. Pipelia 1) L11 not for park; `.edication which is approximately .8 of az ° 3 DNS c r t City Paz Recreation Department. Second, t}" Orel ope- is to submit erosion control plan and Director KV/js LI nd ry 1 :aff Is 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 December 10, 1985 MR JAMES MERILA MERILA & ASSOC INC 7216 BOONE AVE NO BROOKLYN PARK, 55326 RE: BUR OAK PARK - BUR OAK HILLS - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Merila: The purpose of this letter is to rerpnnd to your inqui' _. c dedication in the vicinity of Bur Oak Pa?• and the Soul' .U.? . The South Delaware Hills P.U.D., of wh_ch you are ct r -,ni,ly p?_ann ing a proposed development called Bur Oak Hills, has a negotiat,_'d parr ar°> be dedicated to the City at the time of development. Inasmuch as the ar be given for parks purpose was the result of a negotiated agreement an ame part of a contract, I see no reason at this time to make any charge n t .'e proposed park area. However, if it can be demonstrated that l:h.,: is a significant benefit to the parks system because of property line Qh n ;_ , t is may be permissible. In summation, the City has a nE,cr, f..ated agr eem-1t for :s a' -t hLpk the utE Delaware Hills P.U.D. and sees no reason to modify that a-z >ement. Should you have further questions regarding this particular area, pleas e feel free t contact me. Si r ly, Ketr raa Director of Parks & Recreation KVIjs CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STP[ N(fH AND GR0VPH! IN OUI C MMUNiW `? ?..p?.? ,,?r , `°, ;. ?? r ? ` . ?' x ?.' '?.a ? ?- ?t j ? :t .??'? ??° i ._ _E - ?s?? ? ,? FlAs QUIT I i i CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS) LOCATION: NEa, SEa, SW4, SECTION 12 EXISTING ZONING: PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 23, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned Development in Section 12. ZONING & LAND USE This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway 149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family) classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line. BACKGROUND!COMMENTS There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary plat of 1979 will require another public, hearing. Therefore, this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family). The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat. As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be graded substantially. The Parks and Recreation Dept has briefly reviewed this site and is opposed to it for several reasons: 1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed by the proposed grading. .2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along the weste°rn" property line where typically 5.1 is needed for practical use/maintenance. 3) The access into the park- is only one lot wide fronting Rolling Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and Consultant was for a four lot area. BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 2 The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication requirements. GRADING The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer- ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter- sections. There are several intersections where this 2% grade is exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections. Because of the rugged topography, there are several areas on the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time, these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result, the staff will recommend a detailed pro oral from this applicant as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also, staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec- tions where he does not achieve a 2% lope for 100' past the intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site, staff recommends the applicant obtai written authorization from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowi g them to perform the necessary grading operations within Willia s Brothers easement. DRAINAGE The proposed grading in this site will existing drainage patterns. This site drainage district G as shown on FigurE eventually ends up into Pond GP-l (Burr outlet is in place for this pond whic ponds that all have positive outlet; valley. not change any of the is located within major 1. All of this site Oak Pond). A positive z outlets to downstream to the Minnesota River This development will be responsible for providing the necessary ponding area for GP-1 and also for the portion of Pond GP-8, located within this development. This development will require the extens: between Pond GP-8 and Pond GP-l. It also w of -trunk storm sewer from GP-l southerly i If the applicant chooses to have this w( contract, then the_ City Council must a prior to final plat approval. If the dev( City trunk storm sewer privately, then it because the City has no provisions to pr performed privately., on of trunk storm sewer ill require the extension °o its-southern boundary. )rk performed under City uthorize such a project doper chooses to install will be at his own expense ovide credits for work BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis- trict N-EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N-EE. However, the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub- district N-EE to subdistrict N-AA. Because of this, staff re- evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line. Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N-EE, thereby eliminating the necessity of any trunk sanitary sewer within this area. This development will be responsible for extending sanitary sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway 55. WATER MAIN This development will be. responsible for extending an 8" water main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries where appropriate. STREETS Trunk Highway 149 borders 77th Street abuts the e Highway 149 is under the of Transportation and is West is a - rural roadway Grove Heights. the westerly portion of this development. asterly edge of this development. Trunk jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street section under the jurisdiction of Inver With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac, -staff - agrees with the applicant's street plans. Staff recommends not approving the bubbles for the following reasons: 1. -There is -no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles. 2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle. BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 3. The large paved areas within the bubbles create safety hazards as children tend to play in them and they are located too close to the through streets. 4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact. 5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up to the north for a future potential loop street through this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling Hills Drive located within the panhandle. Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should be eliminated because the only service it provides is for an additional lot or two. Tot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather small for a corner lot anyway. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate 60' right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat- ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the preliminary plat. This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within city- right-of-way. - This development will also be responsible for obtaining easements through the park property, if required by the Park Department, for utilities. PERMITS This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits: 1) MPCA sewer extension. 2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension. 3) MN Dot Access Permit. Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation of an EAW. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility of this developer. Staff -recommends that no final plat approval be granted until the City receives all-permits. BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found that this development is still responsible for trunk area water main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on Figure 3. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Main (010-54, 011-04,010-79, 010-75,010-76,013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 165,530 (1) 0.05/S.F. 8,276 (013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 4.2 Ac $1,353/Ac (2) 5,683 Upgrade (011-04) Total $97,259 (1) Includes 20% credit for streets (2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid) The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting at the rates in effect at that time. CONDITIONS: 1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their easement. 3) A a condition of approval,- this development shall insure that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP-8 to pond GP-l and the southern boundary for future extensions. 4) This development shall insure that sanitary sewer facilities are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide for future extensions for later developments. „BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 6 5) This development shall insure that an 8"" watermain is looped through this plat from T.H. 149 to the existing watermain within Chapel Ln. Extensions of water lateral to the east and south boundaries will also be required for future service extensions, 6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubble") in the SW corner & the half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr "bubble") in the NE corner shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver Grove Heights. 7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cui-de-sac in the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate connection to Chapel Ln. 8) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30" easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat. 9) All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 10) This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this- proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11) If-public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. .UGE, .IDE EL FI R, P. A. ATTORN77Y=7 AT s-.Avg CEDARVALE F;.0 LLZ EUtL E NGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 85122 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W.£IDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 January 16, 1986 Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development Dear Dale: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454.4224 You have asked me to clarify the developer°s rights under the South Delaware Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18, 1979. A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent c= other zoning classifications with specific code criteria for 1 _r::1 use, : r-bec ;s, parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planed s?>??elc>i? _>n ?onr pct t=it_h its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a ?r lied DE 1o ,en?_ designation is a superimposed zoning designation (section 11.20, Subd. 8) which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning. Very truly yours, DGK:ras cc: Thomas Hedges HAUGE, FIDE & KELLER, P.A. David Keller ?, _? t ? «?'' +? Preliminary Plat -Of?. ?.° , SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS 7-1 \\,??\\}} s ? r r 1 s _ r • o? J)l 44 ? e !Rx* l `. s?,?l.J?` ?i ' s;:ri eroF, E, a.*s: awe. N o; e °".? 7 "ti ®r -°?'??.1.?.-1` 9.rj '??? ,a ..? _ ? ` t 4??1 ""` I ?' f J. ?' r ?a?',??? •fi r ' o ? `• - ! _ ° 7 BU OAK HILLS N, Je u I ( f T. HAMAD 7'?l? ?r2 /JJ { a } t ?; 4 • "'1 = \ :e®a ?vm vzi "All :f?.:e '?.' -_ - .. t •...i. STY! ?/ / o d y m c. t PRELIMINARY PLAT --------- "?.? L ' f to „ t 2 , TOTAL ? TOTAL AREA av wssn: • MAL u." or'OTS 4-4 Lou I _ e <:.`? n+_._ - ?'..> / ~. / - P ., of '•' -. ! L? AMR. var.aa. T -Au ft r < sv?m S ` t1y tt/ // t?!u?)i oW mru m?u anw a°r-% ?•. cco :' . e:»s 4 `-'.- ¢ ?,. C_ -f'? 3 .?yiiY. \.M?BI •., ...Y'. i ,'e?..'. ow. ars ?Sr ,rn-ss w9x o°oe AMR etoao 4® _<J t;;w i `"` _ _ °-°, 1 wzaKa e.ss arsa w.w®s sya 0 X° _°.; $ -- ' r sue. g µ'.e5 r.uao as a-v °c G e 1? .P .w ?° _.^J _'"'?.'.1 1,"'1 _ e ly.u•;r?y a*°!a .,v.-. t?, ; ,rv Mew aa'rswea?O'Da. to^ ?1®? j(• i> • ® Q ® T `?,? '? i?! mr 7 ~ PT 0- _ / ® t _ ti "` !yT„r , `°°...a ?j? ;.® . ?.? ,?..?:® Ka®a I' r r : l ? mi ?7 socci A ?0 PARX AREA wLI s.+w>A aa"9 7 A, 1 , ® d 7 <' t AALP4tc s 7 .?w ® ?` w^? k°° s a 7sw. n... r.... era e h- -- JX7Y \ 4 , r ' - ! onw .n nom. 'S ;?r,Hata" r i7 °? . i " t r ' °?-'? ®e T °?' Ii1, as®swsn 9418 Ac. 31 •® / I 1s °- `'RR.RK ,t} CYR vIu / ?7,,'u ,' t ." _;? }g?,g L -+•, to _ g, i Jrr,// 1...+rs -- '° a3 of a s r' ( a ?b?(`, l ?''' m\ ?' AI : x'19 r4 \w'+ %p. , q 'Ir alas Atrr r, \F Y'` It h A` `'r i .. ' .»r t ??// ..... ^` 3 d ?Xltuaac yrfrc wk, ®'tiL \.. z_ r1's-e; r ??'v :?f??1? !!! ! y 4?. v.?.. l1 S?(?'1, _ - t ®®®®® 1?. ?• '? .P' I'' M- •/ 15<°'k } 5 `L'j ? &!. ®.? .n ®smm m.-®.?m..m p ?, A{ J i too XZAtt4 a Afsoa4YIY.OK CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH LOCATION: NE4, SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 & AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted by Advent Methodist Church requesting a rezoning of R-2 and agricultur- al districts to a single public facilities district south of the Westbury Addition along Lexington Av. ZONING & LAND USE: This site abuts the Westbury Addition to the north and west, an agricultural parcel of r:,pprox. 5 acres and Patrick Eagan Park. to the south. The Le,;a_ngton Square develop- ment is across Lexington Av. The Comprehensive Guide Plan design- ates this area as R-l, single family, 0 - 3 units per acre. The topography is quite flat with the highest areas being at the 890 elevation and the lowest at 884. Off site to the south and west the land drops off rather quickly towards the park. The vegetation consists primarily of scrub grasses over a sandy loam soil, CODE COMPLIANCE: , The proposed church building and parking area will be constructed in a phased approach. The first phase will consist of the main worship area (7,500 S.F.) and parking for 92 cars at 10' spacing. City Code requires 1 space for each 3.5 seats based on capacity design. 300 seats will be provided thus requiring 85 spaces. The northern one-half of the parking Jot will be constructed with the initial development and the remaining area will be graveled for overflow parking. The building setback along Lexington Av is 70' and the parking setback is 30', both within the code requirements of 50' and 20' respectively. -Ample areas to the north and west have been alloted for future expansion. There will be no problem accomodating setbacks and lot-coverage standards. COMMENTS: Access to the church will be from a single 24' drive from Lexington Av. The site distance appears good at this location. A 12' wide-drop off area is provided on the northern most area of this entry drive. A canopy will cover this area in a later phase of development. ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH REZONING & PREL PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 The building will be a single story and consist of either cedar or redwood. A wood frame struction will most likely be the con- struction style, however, the architect wishes to use some brick if the funds become available. Asphalt shingles will also be used. At this point, no steeple is foreseen and the height will not appear out of scale with the surrounding areas. Staff has not seen building elevations as of yet. A preliminary landscape plan has been provided and it illustrates screening of the parking area from Lexington Av through the use of plant material and an earth berm. TOPOGRAPHY/DRAINAGE: This development is located west of Lexington Av and south and east of the Westbury Additions. The existing topography is relatively flat farmland draining in a westerly direction. This proposed development is located within drainage district "J", as depicted in Figure #l. Drainage from this proposed development is to be directed into trunk storm sewer which eventual- ly outlets into pond JP-9 (McCarthy Lake). There are two alternatives available for the parking lot drainage. First, the parking lot could drain to the east towards Lexington Av where storm water would be collected in catch basins constructed by this development and outlets into the ditch along Lexington Av. This would require County approval. The second alternative would be to drain the parking lot to the west in its natural drainage pattern through Patrick Eagan Park to pond JP-9. This would require the approval of the Eagan Park Commission. UTILITIES: An 18" trunk watermain was installed under project 395-I and is located 20' west of the centerline of Lexington Av, which will sufficiently service this project. As part of the Westbury Addition, an 8" sanitary sewer lateral was constructed and a manhole placed at the north property line of this proposed development to adequately service this site. It would be the responsibility of this development to extend the said sanitary lateral from its north property line to its south property line for f-uture service to parcel 010-02, located directly south. STREETS/TRAILWAYS: Lexington Av borders this proposed development on the. east. 'This road is a County road and is presently planned to be upgraded from a two lane rural section to a four lane urban section in 1988. County approval will be required for the entrance location onto Lexington AV. It, will be the responsibility of this development to construct an 8' bituminous trailway adjacent to Lexington Av. ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH REZONING & PREL PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: A 55' half right-of-way will be required to be dedicated for Lexington Av. In addition to all regular 10' utility easements adjacent to public right-of-way and 5' drainage and utility easements adjacent to all lot lines, a utility easement will be required for the sanitary lateral to be extended from the north to south property lines of this proposed development. In addition, a ponding and utility easement will be required if the parking area is to be drained to pond JP-9. A 10' trailway easement shall be provided adjacent to Lexington Av. ASSESSMENTS: Re: indicate the site area storm sewer commercial rates. Description ;earth into the assessments regarding this site is still responsible for the upgrading of trunk and trunk area watermain from agricultural to These are summarized on the following table: Estimated 1986 Amount Quantity Date Trunk Area Water Upgrading 3.73 (ac)(1) $1,830(2) $6,825 Trunk Area Storm Sewer Upgrading Total 162,564 S,F,(1) $0.025{3} $4,065 $10,890 (1) Net Area (2) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($3,020 - 1,190) (3) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($0.075 - 0.050) CONDITIONS: 1) The canopy area will require a Conditional Use Permit. 2)"The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as soon as the overflow area is being used on a regular basis. 3) A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submit- ted and not released until 1 year after completion. The landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan at the time of final plat. 3) A detailed grading and erosion control plan be submitted for approval by staff. 4) This development shall be responsible for an 8' bituminous trailway along Lexington Av. 5) Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering report. 6) All utility & drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenc- ed in the engineering report. ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH REZONING & PREL PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS (continued) 7) The costs of all sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 8) County approval must be obtained for the entrance to Lexington Av prior to final plat approval. 9) County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained for the parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval. 10) Minimum'setbacks & parking requirements shall be met prior to building permit issuance. 11) This development shall assume the additional assessments as defined in the staff report based on rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12) This development shall be responsible to extend the sanitary sewer to the south boundary for future development. 13) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. See 0 I' 1 ? c}ztv??ay s? approximate scale . - 0 6, 7 7 86 -EO ? ?2u 895 5 x 46 2.3 3.5 !. JP 41 L.S. -?.- t 888.3 r ?.5. i ?. J p 6J 1,f 887 0 _L2 899 !' H ?11 JP-3 1 844 BP 00 CITY JP-I0 .? i JP-30 820.8 873.0 830.0 879.4 \5,. 5 J°f c RE J$5220 ` 855 6 818 ° '` \ _, 830 JP-49 I S.KO?GA?E i_..1 818.1 _?.--- _-.__ 83b.0 $1 ti IP-3 "3 8706 69 4 JP- 7 TC{, B3Q.0 ?. 3 NC : rr r 4 872,4 873.2.,8 -_ t` `5 $6,5 ' f27^ 8P-"3 J-$ d 1-7 p- JP-8 7 8740 819.2 8 874 5 fi 8300 N I JP-29 926,0 945.0 5 -1 LP-44 76,0 LP-43 800 J ee 1 851.1 k-' ra P 28 PLACE L 2 1 I 1,1 AID. r ---1 ?({ JP-50 964.0 971.7 I 7b`4? 898, WALNUT L .?,0 q >"' t ','.P S 1 7-^- -_ r; 3-1R84? { 8004 ?z ?T ( I 87,8 I FI i .,fi r - N lJ Bp-11 iY-39 sot-% _ _ E C I PARCEL FIG. c _C- NN c T. • i H4LL V oil 112 C- H I it 63 I fan E v? 61 C-PP pia" 1 4 ? §KOV0L i t C [:_1 Sri 65 27 i'415 Q?D 27" C `" a...b V FA?At; 44 3,A) A _ w f fjfj? gy d ' 2i LA, SUBJECT PARCEL FJ +2 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTE SANITARY SEWER approved: standar plate 2 N m MASTER L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 16, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBMITTED: Two separate applications •.ave '.peen submit- ted by the K. Charles Developr;nent Co;,orat:.on, The z '.rst being a preliminary plat for a 17,620 sq. ft. retail strip center along the southern side of Duckwood Dr and east of Krestwood La. The other is a conditional use for a pylon sign and drive-thru for a restaurant on the eastern portion of the building. ZONING & LAND USE: This site is surrounded by CSC (community shopping center) zoning on the north and east. To the west is the proposed Hardee's Restaurant. it will be important that the access points to Hardees and the subject site meet across from each other. The area to the south is designated limited business, just east of the First Bank Eagan. The land is flat with little or no vegetation at this time. SITE PLANNING & CODE COMPLIANCE: This plat will consist of the retail area ± 2.1 acres and an outlot of nearly 1 acre to the south. Two entry/exit points are provided, one along Krestwood La and the other on Duckwood Dr. Both are large enough for east vehicular movement and have good site lines. Most of the parking will be- on the northern one-half of the site. A one way loop road along the southern portion of the site will provide parking for 29 cars and stacking for the fast food menu board and pick up area. City Code requires one parking stall per 150 sq. ft. in retail areas.- This 12,620 sq. ft. center will require 84 stalls. The fast food restaurant, a food fair type that will include the Golden Skillet and a Dairy Queen, will not have a separate parking area but use available stalls from the 109 that are provided. The parking stalls are shown to be 10' wide and both building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements. Staff has recommended. that an easement between the retail area and the outlot be created- to allow movement between the parcels without going on Krestwood first, Also, that only one access be allowed onto Krestwood from the outlot. K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 The interior lighted pylon sign will be located west of the Duckwood Dr entrance and must be placed 10' within the property line from the widest portion of the signage area. This sign area will be approx. 90 sq. ft per side and the height will be 20'. COMMENTS: The building's exterior will be brown iron spotted brick over concrete block with a concrete walkway in front. Store front accents will be achieved through the use of anodized aluminum - the color has yet to be determined. A rock faced coping will continue around the entire building above the sign band area. The signage will typically be ± 24". The back side of the building will be 8" single score painted concrete block. The gabled entry to the Food Fare area will be sky lighted and serve as a major focal point. A tot lot will be provided adjacent to the northern portion of the restaurant and will require some form of safety barrier from the parking/road areas. A separate trash area has not been shown, therefore, it is assumed that all debris will be contained within the building. GRADING/DRAINAGE: Because this site is rather flat, the grading the applicant is proposing is certainly feasible. The final grading plan the applicant submits for final plat approval shall contain adequate erosion control methods in accordance with the City's Erosion Control Manual. This site lies within major drainage district D as shown in Figure 1. All downstream trunk storm sewer facilities within this district are in place. No trunk storm sewer facilities are necessary as a result of this development. However, this development will- be responsible for extending the existing storm sewer outlet from Krestwood La to their east property line. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within Krestwood La and Duckwood Dr. This development will not require any utilities extensions. STREETS-: Duckwood Dr borders this -proposed development on. the north and Krestwood La borders on the west. Both streets are City streets, Duckwood-Dr is classified as.a community collector street and was constructed to City standards in 1985 under project 429. Krestwood La is classified as a local street also built to City standards.- The northerly access to this development from Duckwood Dr lines up with Town Centre Dr 70 to form a four-way intersection. The westerly- access from Krestwood La is far enough away from the Duckwood Dr. intersection to provide safe ingress and egress. However, staff recommends the Commission stay flexible and require this development to work with the proposed Hardee's, across the street, to line up their respective entrances onto Krestwood La. Finally, staff recommends that the Commission allow only K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 one access to the proposed outlot because it wil not be wide enough to support two accesses. Staff recommends this development provide for a cross easement so that both the proposed outlot and this development can share the westerly access. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate a 40 foot half right-of-way for Duckwood Dr and a 30 foot half right-of- way for Krestwood La. This development shall also dedicate a 30 foot utility easement for the storm sewer extension. ASSESSMENTS: This development area storm sewer assessments at of final platting. will be responsible for trunk the rates in effect at the time CONDITIONS: 1) This development shall be responsible for extending the existing storm sewer from Krestwood La to its east line. 2) This development shall be responsible for working with the development across the street to line up their respective accesses onto Krstwood La. 3) Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood La for the outlot. 4) Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that both the developed lot and future outlot can share one access onto Krestwood La. 5) This development shall dedicate 40' & 30" half right-of-ways for Duckwood Dr & Krestwood Ln respectively. 6) This development shall be responsible for trunk storm sewer area assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting, 7) The- pylon sign be located 10' within the property line and subject to the one time sign ordinance fee of $2.50/sq, ft. 8) A detailed landscape plan on the proposed grading plan be submitted demonstrating suitable screening and berming of the parking areas. 9) An easement be created between lot 1 and the outlot to provide road access -between the two parcels at, the time the outlot is developed. 10)-Only one access be-allowed from Krestwood Ln into the outlot. V-i "Um a f is?dates EAGAN CONVENIENCE EAGAN MINNESOTA a: L. f a 11 of 19 85 t ,? t ion r -- of approximately a 30-- 1 > _ t Roa' a park/school site. v'sory rE _c ? a' a which the City Counc'ml °timately a p ed. L luently, dire with the school a ` - °' ct to survey th- an-' resolve c r associated with W - '_'c_- to acquisition. C the parcel f acquisition was to Y:;?e taken place in Deco 1 t1p ' tion the survey, it was noted that th rty 1 changed tly from the original proposal 1 ° reduced to aLtely 28 acres in size. These ti-) tt _ f-- _ - ht- City was requiring ten acre,^r' rE _ ' a _,i._d __, accomodate both the school dE v lcpment. These revisior: _ unacc _ _ RE e tion t A ns did nc t l=msh, 1 or tho y the e .. c. Issior_o ail is Drive or Trails End -d, which is y °or acqu: ition, so Wescott Roao', h Cit pE _f ._-1 a prc l' y Review of pos oad ME_..ib ill n---. ; A least two c alts t scho, " i u ".ty park '.ficantly. -se of tt number of issue; !ave evolved ing the site, the it ntendent of Schools, the cool district's E 't, ney, Direi El ry Educ tion, school district architect, D:' ct RE c rn and P' - Planner held a meeting to review the . i? di i ltern__ _ l.v - J. II ;reed at the _i uat rE vi d of '.strict and t_'s - rk cilities 1 , indicated that t of is, wJ .a `'°e district's set-o' as _ _ t -*,)n t ct and City was nc qit ' °oned, Mr. inc -.ted that if th greater than t, a lisp the City , the district 1 do so. 1 An i-I -i-ping wp- recently held with the landowne- to -°°ll ad °l:i.. 1 prope_ -;,y to the City/school. Staff I En ig Del , the implications k 1 iiscape Architect, Sullivan, 'e_ig__s to be 1 Distr- r< S 1 1 be rro' „ni-.il t d---L4 - C on T th- vision will be able to r aview a neg. In ion , n r%nnn ng 1. di, g tv i c a, g t si a Ler is ling to sell the roadway alig -1 L11 questionable, but f t t' ;r rei to favor an a' W L tie least amount f o: nr )erty. ". 11,, f ` ..,. Sad,. ',E„ldent of Schor 1 d ich a exceed the C ° ',y's proposed pt a e ,' Lsh its park site objectives. trict is requestir- the City -,ante n, 4third in the cost of add! t ' onal pr( to 1 °°ould am- it to approximately c id a kcal: c"' $13,500® FOR iA .la T, rf AT To review iscussed i) e plan for t` / v -i4;e and to d° fu _c _ iay be to acqu3 utor of m On acv/js 2 1 't -1SCrr;- rJ(? ?d `d,„,,l 7 • - 777 'S^r-r"-"•_.., a V `r ` 1 F f) yam{ ( // /??yu,r jre *?Sv ??? ( \1 Ott ® ?Gv? A his ` 3 i.,?y., -.,?..y ; '??•?? J _'^v-+--•' ??i i ?. i f Jt ?`\ \.J. 11 \?'' ,r d88..-..„ -f lll •` m i ' 111 ?.? ? ./..? Ton il, 1w t^r°s^,e? - not -77 A 1 'Fl' ? F Wow 01 1 1 r?, '? \" •3 ?ir/ _.=?f] a'yi`" _ ?\?99 'L F J _ X 7'? n?i 7":\ \ g ? "-) >i-?( r. y. ??: OWN, INT "NA ;?Jo! Oil ?'}?'"_, l j?+}y' p"` bs•?yq , it ' ... ?)i one i 00. MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986 SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT At the December Planning Commission meeting the Commission requested the Engineering Department to review how Wescott Hills Dr could be extended. Staff studied the area with representatives from the Parks and Planning Deptsto determine the most feasible exten- sion of Wescott Hils Dr to the south. Staff's recommendation for feasible alignments are shown on the attached sketch. As it turns out, an alignment, through the Greensboro Addition is not feasible for the fo surwing reasons: 1. Extremely diffic It topography 2. Large amount of I..nassessable frontage 3. Excessive amount of right-of-way acquisition Instead, it makes more sense to extend Wescott Hills Dr easterly and then southerly or extenc Trails End Rd southerly and connect Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property. The Engineering Dept will be<forwarding these feasible alignments to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary future street extension in this are., cc: Dave- Gabbert, Developer Paul G:-iffin Ken Vr aa, Director of Parks & Recreation enclosure 4 tom„ . a m 70 r-- ! ? VV '., , C?i AQ "My 3ti 13 RAW _ F 4-- `? I t d I t" i ` 1 , f? .>t u 4 ? t -'` f•, j ???\ >?.. ?/ f? ( ?? e r }'ll '-./ ?w t \ -!f/f _ r tCf ,?/ IN 71 rig k - 6!` 14 s., ,x r w Vic. .fi ? -"'%-? ??? ?.;'` e^` i ? '?, _ _. ti m_"?-.Yti "?, ? •i'? ?.y '` ? 4 ., y,f.'t'` k a 541! f v""?x? \,,)? )??, ?-._.-'.??' ,; rFi^ 1d'? `% '?¢?a„??"'^`^x Yi ..`C.?'n ,y?y;•..""" ii,i S? t ?k ?tG?.?. -WAS 40 t FlJ .% ?; -X_ ?S .f/ 7 .\` _ 'A y R *e. i F 4=3 ` ?? t ? r "- ? -+ .. ?? s?il S? f .?..-..ft? 9 ?'A1 ?1,?'??+? r l ?- ., 4•i ?t S ? ?t t t '`???i i 4.7, i*f. ?1 ? i .:.,y??rar/??'?? ?1.- .? ?'ti'y' ? :_,.' 'N..L'.>-si"?,j'{ ? '•. ?» '?,? ?,.1 ??:''A? t' °a`"' ? f, 'y- ?_ p ar t? '_ _ J t ??,Y?`K?1?, 1?? {?'`3?(il• °/*" f??a. s> `?? l.p_ ???i"?a .(7- '1?? ?p?'. 7 •-?-__ j t s? l6? .7 ? .7 ? S'': r'. ?1 'S?'?k'? ?n.r '?" ? Lt ?{L i ?s e. son ??, , ? •, ? _ \? °'. f'_"'" ?`'_-' \ /?:} -- ``?' ? { :? W"''it"T L' hJ.,?r `" m?.? ? ?1? ' k,? $ 1j ?f ?? }r .Jtiyt ? d •d(? t.'°w Y ? fil .t . +`, e-*7 Avow /'fr ^.r 1 ?a r x ."°sa?a g atyg#'1 ; t .' ti11f t`ijbc?+:Lt#dltr'.,._.,a'X Kts?r MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986 SUBJECT: ADDS, TO GREENSBORO PEELIMINARY PLAT At the Decemb the Commission requested the Engineer Wescott Hills Dr could be extended. ith representatives from the Parks a: the most feasible exten- sion of We Staff's recommendation for feasib] -he attached sketch. As it turns c ie Greensboro Addition is not feasibl 1. E? 2. L ontage 3. 3 y acquisition Instead, it makes more id Wescott Hills Dr easterly and then southerly or extend Tra..L_ End Rd southerly and connect Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property. The Engineering Dept will berfc:r arding these feasible alignments to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary future street extension in this areae cc: Dave-Gabbert, Developer Paul Griffin Ken Vr_aa, Director of Parks & Recreation enclosure 1 &+ cr - ri ri - d. a v h- t Advisory a several 1ssio > _.ndum was a'- to th€- C ov 3 also rev M-,-Jr r 1{ b' ; that the t discuss, at work t r T'ke n? .4. o. Parks u 11, Prairie, 11 of Blaine, me for near- r 11 da; 1 2e and the relationship it has with exi: t 'ate 1 s. It is not the in'-. - nt of th g _ - )r° - to re ' I at this rnppfiraz°, T° i.c it i-. f ere c le °: . S v p. v , 4 t t 70 ''is Y that .., ^ks dedical a 'a °ovi 3) Z '°it 's Dmmer 1f av".es for credit where there are sini"°h p s ana open space. It still a. that Eagan°s parks ded" °Duld, 1" 1 e better compl-- - ti e r' ieref ore, s' be nevi "r U_ i,ivris. 1 It must be rec v z i of th - i he stren t. ordi: z dedic< -' , bE Y the r it- ___able j Witt aui a t it 1 uscepti`le to ,-urt shall STATUTE At i statute Whit ly all Gies 9 aid dedication t t: c , wr ch are C• p".,m tion iy p_'r . V.-__O-- _dic_-._ dedication, t lea, t ., should be "t ased on t- a f ii 4 the land no later ie time of the final api 'c "a municipality reasonably d 1es that it will need t th portion of l<^'^-' for the purpobt _d,"" In the t' eitical or-, _; Perh-,;3 one significant court case-- )arks dedication is Kool:ts vs. the City of Bloomington in Which the Court upheld Bloomington and that its 10% 1,= id I ` on W a bl Cc ;equently, any communitie 1 ce ;°)n in <'o this 10% "t e ._ tratE t, is rea `re and 3ecau info be'. Tutu _1 --id __v__ k , 6 < ' act ties, a r borhood par's at 'ar_, th- i_ °elquality o' City to acs Lire for parks purposes and has defined parks as - pencl.' locati t a , t`a C' e ce11 1fi4-., 4- Would t. t System; P ng ur p_ a- F r, City ha- is us u 1 tioxa, LU would then seeu. ea its 1-®®d cash) t=-_ed on population a c .velopment. l 11 A of 10% '.e ® M B ' i ' 14v 4 , w f, c ve'-- ct I_ Auld n' for 1 1.c , on a 11 --ale W'- inc ..H. y , .act, for prov parks i v W va _i, t- '-- t 'C P Sta` a° na-e t,,*,? qT "fad .A r t accept c llectively, ra v! It also app ..d vision plat '___' lue. 2 that the y of ' history of setting values for parks cash a.tion that is c E t land ? 'es is an appropriate me thodology. f e, staff v a recc ad that t rrocedure continue, but that the cc .7,34 --t to 6;hv,, 1 gy us ,' OF T °Thro z h the City' : ,. . - nd fe^i' "-y w, v needy d a st _ - d of 15 -f 1 borhood r c and c er popu' ';ion of 1,000 persons is an applicable ; !ndard, .P ly twelve acres of this 15 acre amount shall ce - u' tborho 3 and shall be the minimum standard established by t Y. TI ?ef ore, the City shall requi 1. 1 ,Lc,. aunt 3 s 11 Ue 1" c .. c u u.i.i 1 Ur.- Single family - 3.5 T' le - 2,8 Quads - 281 - 1.9 area per p 3 ° 1< on c proper zoning v 1i.. This .1 1 shall be as follows: Irv DT C _j 4 .i e 1' y p< ly, cu -Iant v ? , °A 1 sir R.:e fair 1 g ..a adult from single y es. A 1 t I "' and D-` into consi deratic'-, 5+° 3-0 ___t l family _ dE t lly more c t il`°ip1 family reside Y7 3 ntage of lane" C t 1 less than to T'e inc land dedication straight 10% " ind dedication reardle: f ire. CASH DEDICATION Th cash ded° calculate is v similar t ly f t g? un tv. is 4?, ll4 g 100 pop tit I. I-A b d' units per 10 3 _-nu' ation. The otl v been that t Cit us' g 12 1,000 popul, `pion a ^'. Util3 per 100 pc .,ation 1 s. ,,,?? ra w y c ih equiv_l .e.s 13 tb 0 population, qual a 1 unit. b r c.., be 11 ,.,2.-0 unit. ally 5 I '.1ity for t y by prow a L v f - "- value c wt, property IAL/ C ... B".a -ad:* - ledication whicl, oping. I ,-. _ p - nue as it k , but 6 The Special T _c o t _ t f . 1 e ?q appropriate t co 1 _1 guidelines ror st t L so ta41 ae and place for pre--r4-- ; M. " D discussed relative t, he ty.>e volunteer/c( t Lbt ion made I th ims being rep fc: i` only a ° . . it the s ;tee's` of which staff 3 to d i®.ch is t most apps 3 t for effo rt and extent of contribution. 1. A plaque This is intended for long-standing vol a significant nature. 2. C- - For an or n , ,i who participate in a 3. logos plt rord "vo ith staff L. to 6. - Embroidered fa-,r _c patch generally I hr aff discretion : 1. a. Pins - pP?_. --- -- with lapel c designed 1,__. 6. Pens - `. logo. 7. Mu-z! - rvs.;1A "impartment logo. Q 8 . S " °'T1 rr Re ' volunteers st ild be a ly admin requi =s a minimum of recor Ln. Sto age of items i tventorsy of objects rec gnif icant story r > was aii c acretion to award is th- 1 gal Pc i en vj; ¢ ` Qi-,aff to a? as of individual performs 1i_- as '®. will ;e of the individual and the Qn , - L xsw , ly that would be most appropriatA. ae 1 c item is not as important as the appropriateness to age, SE I t The scene of r,_ :c -,'I_n '_so dM c d nd it w?c most appropriat,c ' °^ly fur , woulu I of events. It w, that Volunteer F April, individuals mi b- -.nvited to _ Fission met repo ized« Final' y, significant cant I ' c as would recd, ion Co "s or City C so s L'.z,c,, I t t h cs n'' V I- t to be As 'ied 1 14. r__s d .I L , e 1 t t 1, __d _i___ r d€v_ c I to a] -cificall,, 1: DlunteE Ignition P t subcommittee felt that the rew and benefits far excea ld the ost and repre )o r ' ue for the { ient» To re h c , c pu-c' C_ which ld p c j buds o" v ii ,cc iitior I - nt Respectfully submitted, U U.L r recreation KV/ js DRAFT W "?P 15, 1986 TF C C r c PT Theo ns are ill-advised at tt safe b_kcycle tra y." s is evident now and this need oPr_l, Tne® population of the County bases. Frc a transpo: makes -ease to "ve a..+ ..,;, 1 _ JLl ,J V i ,, , ?nnect t Couni i l: to bet to work, .c,g centers, anu to use If Dakota County an extensive, well-coor, t i s ounty would bE c to in A -ety is an 'on. ' ha it c i oads. r roa( allo_. for taw sa fe , ssage oi -)icyclists. _sA_?refoz e, a system for b' yelists is . >ry. Apparent c ` f att: of plans r m hunty level Sias an importe 4. 4- on the pla level. E ? plans for trails have ' the Cit. acX°rdanee w.ich County plans. Any drastic .-- This 1-te all the id money used to produce 1 to of Last, .. w l' & Re; d ion KV/js T11 e* C ping ?$ needs. The Mi. _) :sota co recreation providers such J_. 0. L L )L ation and data will also by h Minnesotans. Y ap3 r L .. ..,' .s e Opp ? pp}} gg?? ..ty ?. _ hai /L,C.M or ve" .lities, _' ution st ? c ant's C c on Minr ; p =d. Ao i ddress tr- - m o expand pportuni °c r a: to plan for recreational oppo t). =s for j tic nr '0 1 .iv To )i )ve _p ve the letter of support and interes pr oviding( recreation and all services and opportuni i f ure n c" - )ectfg. i. ®c (ion KV/hb tg for 's and 1 wor ?' • ?m° v ~ to the, nstr; r »imat 1 tw pros r t Hill Pa k ? .. ase the a Thane selected was ver simile t the roof I for the c '1E ^ park structures, direr t v - _ to the 1 rm to proceea with additional refin i deve of cost pr jections . ai will revs ding .? r i ,"-.e arch _s ects have done a s takeol a of t 1 `ht' certaii l j morQ „?t 15 rt a< f- . t - - - :. t ro tares oll P C® ._- arm Park Pavilion $106,000.00 iris Shelter 82,0-0.00 Hill gr,.rr 8n? ;F view y Y +30,000-00 Set 7 w t, c uilk t If-'3e f• c 3 are 3 d ana x 1 . r v 1 ,here .ll be Ae F. c r_a d.,duc c. _.,:ria l ypes cxx ' ux v i. x buil,' ° i roc' sill be rec°- sted. ld also b ate 1 t„ a bid as -r ,+ 4 pail-I-)n, alth is fly c -1 i mi '1 ry co c this si '.d be id =.d . As s will gall, the PnI she or th D ring f'c the she 1 fund Provic cimately $318,0- $1001- .0' t Fa-- at T th ®tion __ut v,^10. _ i 1'.4,0, .0- r avail (This she fall does not include the $30,000.00 tt ' l he three smaller shelter buildings.) At the October 3rd meeting of the Cox i? , i the poten it ?ortfall with an anticipated cc is 0 i >430,000.-O. Several It 1-1 1"4" , Committe- A 1 :: al state, ,ok no formal _.mc , it r f could be made from three >b e 1) ')ond cy (associated with these individua,t ps e) c t.auction cost fhe sprincr 1985 park contract 3) and i-, u. b? :nt the c ite fund. Alt9 ___v be 'I ')le doll t' continency real,' f f ',,5 cc.. the fu 1 ' this sc thi not y _ known. not an to le 'e action fir i dd thei e, w f.0 r -m the und. F• ox$ s aw , cost o :ertainty ( n with parks deve-_pment, 7taff is recommending the entire )unt b, from the Park Site Fund. 2 FOR C-" P r -TION To appro approve support.v€ for t k buildings the Park i e Acquisition and Development Fund o 145,000 to mal t tr ;fr 3 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986 RE: CONCEPT PARK PLAN REVIEW - COST PROJECTIONS Consultant Parks Planner, Tim Erkkila and City Parks Planner/Landscape Architect, Stephen Sullivan, have begun to develop final plans for five parks to be under construction this year. As with last year's spring construction contract, this year's phase development work will include all utility work, grading, seeding, sodding, roadways, parking lot and trails. Additional surface development will be coordinated the following year. Several revisions have been made to the preliminary park plans previously prepared as part of the Park Systems Study. These revisions are a result of the need to balance earthwork, utilities, etc. as well as recognizing changes over the last year or two. At the meeting, staff will review with the Commission concept plans as prepared. Approvals will be sought to proceed with final grading plans and construction documents. The Commission will have an opportunity to review final plans at the March meeting. Staff has also prepared preliminary cost projections based on preliminary concept plans. To further emphasize, these are cost projections which will be refined after approval by the Advisory Co,rission based on final grading plans and unit cost estimating. The cost projections are based on work expected to be completed under the contract. Staff has also prepared cost estimates for some of the future work projected at each park site. Also listed is funding available under the parks bond fund. These figures, both projection and bond fund do not estimate costs associated with any design, engineering or provide for contingency. They are presented as a basis of information for the Advisory Co + fission. Projected cost figures will be refined and presented in greater detail at the March Commission meeting as the "engineering estimate" for work to be completed. This estimate will also have a breakdown for "future" cost considerations as well. PLAN REVIEWS Staff is not able to provide you with reductions of the concept plans. These will be presented in large scale to the Commission on Thursday. Briefly, however, the following changes or revisions have surfaced at each of the following parks: Meadowlands - Orientation of the ball field has been shifted slightly to better align with the remainder of the park and fit grading contours. The roadway and parking lot have been shifted and slightly lengthened to bring the park user deeper into the park and closer to facilities. Two tennis courts, previously depicted, were taken out of the parks bond fund and therefore, removed as part of the concept planning. Members will take note that preliminary cost projections exceed the bond fund amount. L wnic unaerc t the DO] ,J its time fs lity. T ing lot and pm d fut relocat c° the hockey fa( ° _ies on t park d2° 'n complicates the p t ,ti west. T Y - ground ion t 3caus'' •° 3- not th- Pilo oncept design for this park has been s( rest-- oa c'_e lac__ -)f information on the orthern Net 1 C p.3 pA" ' , .%.;a a a sects .cross a wrc t i r' t" 'A-k. I - pip r elatively shallow rid Ill L antld hat can take place l t =.sult, r e yaks p viously p >e' 1 3t ta: t -a have b n area c r: cant t_. l ___ort o• - l iaterial.. w_, . -irst de i ted _h t over 10,0 3 yards of b< ow will be cc t . C to tly, c' € 3tion is given to th( pr D ev3 a t --or - view by the Advis+ y thL 6• lt.r. A to by vIc>' nd the preferred altk, as ti final _ 3-n. < • . T' r ..a . _ to _ - l S - 1 9 i_ 1l TI° Ad _V offered s t °i 'c 1 its development _ r use as fl-i the par]-. 'S Blume C? , i/Blu Shield Conn an1Gi _ -,will - - " -id Pilot _' South Oaks TOTAL: Bond Fund: a .. J TOTAL: Bond Fund TOTAL: Bond Fund $1c", 300 $227,500 $ 100,000 $198,600 t o t.1a3,000 $120,000 68,000 $133,000 KV/js