4172 Raptor Rd04/21/2014 12:20 Les Jones Roofing, Inc. (FAX)9528817009 P.0111011
4111' City of Eaaa
3630 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 66122
Phone: (651) 675-6675
Fax: (651) 675.5694
Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
For Office Uso
/Permit #:
Permit Fee: 361:
Date Received:
Staff:
J
2014 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 'z52%/9
Date: 470431/54 f Site Address: WO- 4i// S/-W(a8 */?. if'4P12, Roo' Unit #:
sn�� ,
� �
ice. o ; �� ���at� ��,,�,,,,-1 ��
-� ,,
�
tzcam.;,
"'
y 0 G �vG. 94
Name: a f� T� rt�.�" � Phone: �' �� �9
Address / City / Zip:
y p:
Applicant Is:
,
B 2 5 v
�O 01c ?� /N a2� G�o�.s 6,r�-s /12i✓ 5324ro
Owner _X. Contractor
1. �
sh ; '''p'a,- '
,'�t
.:'st''' `
Description of work:
Construction Cost
p' ,4ii/t.1 Z16PMC.E44"6 -
2-9 c2 , 2. 9s Multi -Family Building: (Yes...X./ No )
� � 1,: li%-
it 4'Address:
rho a fw a��o)`
v 'ql 0 .'
r: `: ; -';
To QaFin1C�` � nTG Contact CH�RtS �jp51�.`��
Company:• L
Ott W S' L—�
-�City: .3.hDM.troCTT?Al
State: MLN Zip: S----.14-2-0 Phone: Si9'—$g(-2-241
License #: (aSc,O Lead Certificate #: NAfi q0.372--1
If the protect Is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional Information)
In the last 12
Yes _No
months,
If
Contractor:
Contractor:
COMPLETE THIS
has the City of Eagan
yea, date and address
AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDJNG
Issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan?
of master plan: •
Licensed Plumber:
Mechanical
Sewer & Water
Phone:
Phone:
— Phone:
c"ii ` c U e4o e r, ° aro "
i',`he ff., " �q �i i k. d i //( (/,.��
�� 1 4 � it 1. � r ...-"
i) /i��"�'e� �� / 1� , u���-
ity�,`�dt(ij ;p{' s ' �
�t .,Ai Idy�A ..',
/ " e`'° e r k 'j.
.i I i4 (} � X 77 �j�A''' r��Y it .d.i0° ri02' ) ° Ir° 1. 91l / 9411 �7�ri u% '�"o
/2y�,C �..}1�i. t;, 'k/�-. 1. ������� �l � y 4'���,i9s� G i��l��q)�!� �'L(�yiyPLb C71(�rr�'_ ��'.n rF 1 �, ��'
n r /n Y Cl �y 1�,, �,1. ! °Y�°.f?.t'° �f u.li10;i ik°F J ��01*;, 7 �'¢A� ).0 1i° 4/, �Q, �r�t( jrtfo
'� ;�,yf��,r. ��'�'•' ,�.cl � �r ' � � ' .. � fyr�-ppb-y'� ii ��
(�;i'XAA° r al-l�A� 0,?f, 1-i(-0' A I �trJr..l. r. t. ,,: ,.r; ,,,,, !r•. .:i 's : "jF
CALL_BEFORE YOU DIG. CaN Gopher State One Call at (661) 464-0002 for protacUon against underground utility damage. Cab 48 hours
before you Intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.000herstateonecall otq
I hereby acknowledge that this Information is complete and accurate; that the work will be In conformance with the ordinances and codea of the City of
Eagan; that I understand this Is not a permit, but only an application for e permit, and work Is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in
accordance with the approved plan In the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
Exterior work authorized by a building permit leeued In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180
days of permit leeuence.
40.14is 47%/4e-72,5 ate!
x
Applicant's Printed Name
X
Ap Ilcant's Signature
Page1of3
. ..?:?. ..?. R?DENTI?
? 4(+BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF EACAN
- ?T ? sS `?O•?
3830 PILOT KNOB RD - 55122
651-681-4675
NewConstructionReauirements ??RemodellRe?airReauirements u
• 3 registered site surveys showing sq. ft. of lot, sq. ft. of house; and all roofed areas • 2 copies of plan ?
(20% mauimum lot coverage allowed) • 1 set of Energy Calculations for heated additions
• 2 copies of plan showing beam & window sizes; poured found design, etc.) • 1 site survey for exterior additions & decks
• 1 set of Energy Calculations . tndicate if home served by septic system for additions .? _ ? U
• 3 copies of Tree Preservation Plan ff lot platted after 7/1/93
• Rim Joist Detail Options selection sheet (bldgs with 3 or less uniGs)
DATE I I
JOB SITE
IF MULTI-FAMILY BUI
PROPERTY OWNE
G, HOW MANY UNITS? _
w ?'O (?1 Y??? fl
TYPE OF WO° FIREPLACE(S) 0_ 1 2
APPLICANT?l/t PHONE# 0?'J2?lbN"70_7D
ADDRESS 1-7(o?? ? UY'l lDe i? ?.A?'? ?--C ? ll I 1 I? ZIPCODE 5?8'"?'
PAGER # CELL PHONE #4171 ---)' -7 01 g fo O__7 FAX # ar2a $91D-5a5
NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ONLY - FILL OUT
Energy Code Category _ MINNESOTA RULES 7670 CATE ` O'R?Y 7, J(check one) - Residential Ventilation Category 1 Works'eet Submitted
- Energy Envelope Calculations Submitted
?s
MINNESOTA RULES 7672
i
- New Energy Code Worksheet Submitted
Plumbing Contractor: 2ay Phone #:
Plumbing System Includes: _ Water Softener Lawn Sprinkler Fee: $90.00
Mechanical Contractor: 60,. 't) r-"e- Phone # ? ?? ?? ? ?6-7
Mechanical System Includes: Air Conditioning Fee: $70.00
, _ Heat Recovery System
Sewer/Water Contractor: j G n Z-:?i IP e ?iY I Phone #?5 j"? 6 ? Ir J h?
All above information must be submitted prior to processing of application.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, state that the information is correct, and agree to comply
with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Stgnature of Applicant Arl
Certifcates of Survey Received ? Tree Preservation Plan Received _ Not Required _
Updated 2002
.:)< Water Heater t No. of R.I. Baths
? No. of Baths
VALUATION ( 35jOclo
?r
A-
OFFICE USE ONLY
?_ .
O 01 Foundation ? 07 05-plex O 13 16-plex ? 20 Pool ? 30 Accessory Bldg
? 02 SF Dwelling ? 08 06-plex ? 16 Fireplace ? 21 Porch (3-sea.) ? 31 Ext. Alt - Multi
X 03 01 of -?L plex ? 09 07-plex ? 17 Garage ? 22 Porch/Addn. (4-sea.) ? 33 Ext. Alt - SF
? 04 02-plex ? 10 08-plex ? 18 Deck ? 23 Porch (screened) ? 36 Multi
? 05 03-plex ? 11 10-plex ? 19 Lower Level ? 24 Storm Damage
? 06 04-plex ? 12 12-plex Pibg_Y or _ N ? 25 Miscellaneous
X 31 New ? 35 Int Improvement ? 38 Demolish (Interior) ? 44 Siding
? 32 Addition ? 36 Move Bldg. ? 42 Demolish (Foundation) ? 45 Fire Repair
? 33 Alteration ? 37 Demolish (Bldg)'` ? 43 Reroof 0 46 Windows/Doors
? 34 Replacement *Demolition (Entire Bidg only) - Give PCA handout to applicant
Valuation Occupancy P`3 MC/ES System
Census Code Zoning ? City Water -
SAC Units 0j Stories ?.. Booster Pump
Nbr. of Units '°f Sq. Ft. J?52= PRV
Nbr. of Bldgs Length ,60 Fire Sprinklered
Type of Const Width .9-6
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
? Footings (new bldg) ? FinaUC.O.
_ Footings (deck) FinaUNo C.O.
Footings (addition) _ Plumbing
? Foundarion HVAC
? Drain Tile _
?. . Other Z
S?'???NG I?S9Xelnow? I4
*fir ° 61LO Pll-tlU
Roof -* Ice & Water -X Final Pool Ftgs Air/Gas Tests _ Final
Framing Fvr0114 Stone
Siding
Stucco
Fireplace _ R.I. '- Air Test _ Final _
_
_
_ Windows (new/replacement)
? Insulation _ Retaining Wall
Approved By , Building Inspector
Base Fee
Surcharge
Plan Review
MC/ES SAC
city sac
Water Supply & Storage
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Plant
Plumbing Permit
Mechanical Permit
License Search
Copies
Other
Total
0/ 9 3 ?.?
?
?9 1-1SG -
r?
Linda Dralle
From: Jan Severson
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Craig Novaczyk; Jeffrey Wheeler; Joel Rausch; Linda Dralle; Mike Lence; Scott Peterson;
Susie Scott; Terry Zelenka; Tom Miklya
Subject: Greyhawk
We have the receipt from Dakota County for Greyhawk so iYs okay to issue permits.
Jan
t
t
MNcheck COMPLIANCE REPORT
Minnesota Energy Code
MNcheck Software Version 3.0
COUNTY: Dakota
STATE: Minnesota
ZONE: 2
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Single Family
DATE: 1-2-2003
DATE OF PLANS: 01/02/03
PROJECT INFORMATION:
; Lot 1 Block 2 ,-
Greyhawk
Eagan, MN
COMPANY INFORMATION:
MW Johnson Construction Inc.
17645 Juniper Path #100
Lakeville, MN 55044
LCOMPLIANCE: PASSES
Required UA = 419
Your Home = 288
31.3% Better Than Code
I I
? Permit # ?
Checked by/Date ?
?
Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door
Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEILINGS 1850 44.0 0.0 50
WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 2322 19.0 2.0 130
BSMT: Conc. 4.0' ht/4.0' bg/4.0' insul 464 10.0 0.0 32
GLAZING: Windows or poors, Above Grade 132 0.480 63
DOORS 38 0.350 - 13
HVAC EQUIPMENT: Furnace, 90.0 AFUE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is
consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations
submitted with the permi plicat' The proposed building has been
designed to meet the equire ts of t e Minnesota Energy Code.
Builder/Designer Date U2 O 3
t.,.
` .
LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL
BUIIDING PERMIT APPUCATION
PROPERTY LEGAL: LD f"?' Z- zf E lpG
DATE OF SURVEY: n- U?-
LATEST REVISION: f 2-- 2 6- D?
m
m
c
?v
t
v
Q
O ?
z a DOCUMENT STANDARDS
Gl/? ? • Registered Land Surveyor signature and company
L? ?
V ? • Building Permit Applicant
o ? • Legal description
V?
6/ 0 • Address
d
l
? ? • North arrow an
sca
e
GY ? ? • House tjrpe (rambler, walkout, split w/o, split entry, lookout, etc.)
R/ ? ? • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient %
G7/0 ? • Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation ,
12/ ? ? • Street name
[B/ o ? • Driveway
Vp ? • Lot Square Footage
9?? ? • Lot Coverage
ELEVATIONS
Existin
? V? • Sewer service (or Proposed)
V ? ? • Property comers
?Vo. • Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions
?P/ ? • Elevations of any existing adjacent homes
? ? • Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches
? ? • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.)
Proposed
o • Garage floor
[? ? ? • Basement floor
? ? ? • Lowest exposed elevation (walkouUwindow)
0 ? • Property comers
C9" ?? • Front and rear of home at the foundation
PONDING AREA (if applicable)
F? ? 0 • Easement line
? ? ? • NWL
e-'o 0 • HWL
? ? • Pond # designation
cJ 0 ? • Emergency Overflow Elevation
? Vo • Pond/V1/etland buffer delineation
DIMENSIONS ?0 ? • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions
0 ? • Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb)
C?yEI CI • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, ovefiangs greater than 2', porches, etc.
(i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings)
G? ? i? • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements
??YU ? • Setbacks of proposed structure and sideyard setback of adjacent existing structures
C,7-"Cl f] • Retaining wall requirements, if any
Reviewed:
Name Date
G:/FORMS/Building Permit Application
? ? 6 ,, p 3
.
HPF Boh len CERTFICATE 0F
Y
S
Surveying & Engineering FOR
31462 Foliage Avenue 4735123rd Street W.
Northfeld, MN 55057 F Savage, Suit MN e 200 55378 ? M W. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION
Phone: (507) 645-7768 ` Phone: (952) 895-9212 Fax: (507) 645-7799 Fax: (952) 895-9259 h 924.7
bohlen@rconnect.com bohlen-e@integraonline.com ' 8013 0 0 30 60 90
ADDRESSE&
?80jg1 CLOT 1- 4172 Raptor Road :
LEGEND ?? Lor z - 4168 Raptor Road -
w? LOT 3- 4164 Raptor Road (IN FEET )
LOT 4 - 4160 Raptor Road
- - - - - DRAINAGE a UT]LITY EASEMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
TARA?
-- ?- -? --w-e9a- ExISTING CONTOUR LOT 1- 35,345 sq. ft. LOTS i THRU 4, BLOCK 2, GREYHAWK ADDITION,
LOT 2- 2,802 sq. ft. CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
900 PROPOSED CONTO.UR LOT 3 - 2,700 sq. ft.
q2`? LOT 4- 3,799 sq. ft.
PROPOSED STORM3EWER & CB IHEREBYCERTIFYTHATTHISSURVEYWASPREPARED
BUILDING AREAS: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THRT
' LOT 1 - 1,211 sq. ft. (3.4%)
• DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FpUND LOT 2 1,218 Sq. f t. (43.5%) I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE
SO LOT 3- 1,218 Sq. ft. (45.1%) LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LOT 4- 1, 1 211 sq. ft. (31.9%)
)4??EROY H. BaHLEN, R.L.S.
TB=926x3 pENpTES PROPOSED TOP HLOCK ELEVATION s DATE: 1-20-02 REG. NO.: 10795
rA ? N DATE: 12-26-02 revised
926x0 DENOTES PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ^
q co N)O DATE: 12-31-02 revised
? DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVAT1pN co (V a ? n
oaaxo DENOTES ExISTING ELEVATION co
\
d
? DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION
?
CONTRACTOR SNALL MAINTAIN 2% MINIMUM SLOP POND 1 1 ? 0.Q 8 S i? ??I Zb a
FROM SERVICE END TO SEWER. S ST?RM
NWL=917.9
r ??I(((
xxx.Xx DENOTES SANITARY SERVICE tih 1 ,^° l 9f ° ? ? ' N
?
1NVERT Q END 0F SERV]CE L]NE °i v/ / q? p 2 HWL=922.0 r c? S r
X 5 91,1,
XXX.Jf% CS OENOTES TOP 0r CURB ST L ?z
? ELEVATION 92,
? S89 351 S E
q) '(? ? ? ?aw=
0% x> ) 92 X
NOTE: ALL STORM SEWER SHOWN 8. S PROPO?ED ;? ? J / v? N i= 25x1 +$$
1 83 0 915.0
e
5.0 925.3 C
925.2 Cs 5.6, 92A ?
92 . ax ?
? Q 926x0 0 4
? ? ?? -• -
/ 92g ? o ? 5.8 m 2 6
a? 0'?Sm°,? SO ? 9?P N X W S 1
"D ?° N (? s
x
a"o
\\x\ Npq -Tr 1? C ?W ? I N-? FL T° pq L` ?
-'E A S E M EPdT--P E-R-.- , N 2681 .?.?..-- ' 926. zb.o '
I f? I
-g) ?25
/ 927 927 928 ??' .?-.... N 9 6
193.94 x 928 ^^
928 27
°`? o
-..?._
O, ?r9T
S89'35'30°E
926,4 S V 84% 171 °
9.9% 92 4
20.0 20.0
27x Q 928x1 " 926I
NIT 6.0 = X 5.82
(IN
0 ru
N 4 M II
h N I-
?T AT
30.0
?
x
?
? 5?
8 ?
I 1"-- _
?
EoF ?
. . :`
RECEIVED
JAN 0 6 2003
EAGAN
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENI
FROM : `1W:T FAX N0. : 9528923783
_ -:A6 12:52 EAGAN ENG+COM bEU 4 99528923783
No.234 vea
- ev?orx? iai?aorsoa ?uro s?Aaraaa scs?on?a
(!o be qseA tn aooordance alah %he 'Outdoilnre Eor speaLai 2011psetion and teseInq-)
rnwIct ????z-v, 172PROJZ(.-r ro, _
LaC71?20N. L.u'? ac Z ! 1)
?a a a.?w ?'1M PRRN I7 NO.'
Zhl¦ trohodulit ta b• fi11ed out aeo inelud•d in ehis prejeet •peeiELaation, IRle:mat:
unavallapL• at that t1Te to br 611*4 avt ahen epplglnq !or a)buiiding garmlt.
(3) lRtmLC Ilo, to be proridrm br !h• gwLldinl Ottloisl. {]) Uiv ditCRtpCtQns pei v.e.c. 9eceton
f] I Speclal ir?pic?oc, TirR inQ Aient oc /tbricaear. .?- -.---- .-
(4) Ftrm oonlrao't'ad'to per[orm sesvieep.. n IF`
I?
1C;; 9
APR f) i 2n
U
?eiwo?epo?a?rts ';: J?
taah sppreprt4t• eepsiventsa!!v¦ mvst •iqn delr,vt
A+nsr I _pi'rme aat•?
+
CQrtrllaCOtt IjtreI D?ti a
J?zChlb?e! e ' ' f 1,t1?e !?aC? ?
nae•t
' 81' 77w 0
' ?T? ?lrre: ?ae?•
TR?
Ths ?len?r Deee,
Ps
F: . ,, - slsni? Oees:
? the ,Lridlv14u4i 11ai
MeG bt ali graNpOctlvs apeelai inApaetora and the vark theg 1.n0ond :
ebwfrv* 1"4@ti b* sdeneitled on eha ssYere• oia• oC chi• Form.
&Gqendl maR ? iecuetueAl angineOc of Reaord 8Z . 8pealal Inapaetot
rA ? =qwting Agen6 r ¦ rabrl.cator
Mar. 24 2003 06:18PM P4
Aceepeed tee ehe W 11dLng p4partmoot ey
.
Mark Gergen & Associates, Inc.
Project BODX-02-328C
January 17, 2003
Page 2 '
Geopier Observations
A Senior Engineering Assistant observed the construction of a number of geopiers on January 7 and 8,
2003. The geopier observations consisted of observing the soils removed from a number of the geopier
locations and documenting pier depth and bottom soil type. Based on the auger cuttings observed during
the drilling of the geopiers, the piers Braun Intertec observed extended 2 or more feet into the underlying
natural sandy lean clay, clayey sand and silty sand soils. The geopier observations are summarized in the
tables shown below.
Table 1
Greyhawk Development
Geopiers Observed by Braun Intertec
On January 7, 2003
Lots 1 throu h 4 Block 2
Pier Number De th ft Bottom Soils Notes
13 13 Lean Cla with Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
74 14 Lean Cla with Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
60 13 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
73 12 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
51 13 1/2 Sil Sarid a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
49 12 1/2 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natuxal soils
56 13 Sil Sand a roximatel 3 1/2 feet into natural soils
50 12 1/2 Sil Sand a roximatel 3 feet into natural soils
54 13 1/2 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
48 13 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
42 14 Sil Sand a roximatel 3 feet into natural soils
45 11 1/2 Sil-ty Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils .
39 15 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
37 13 %z Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
34 11 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
32 11 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
26 15 Lean Cla a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
29 13 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils .
Mark Gergen & Associates, Inc.
Project BODX-02-328C
January 17, 2003
Page 3
Table 2
Greyhawk Development Geopiers Observed by Braun Intertec
On January 8, 2003
Lots 1 throu h 4 Block 2
Pier Number De th ft Bottom Soils Notes
27 12 1/2 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
36 12 1%2 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
33 12 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
31 14 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
30 12 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
10 16 1/2 Cla e Sand a roximatel 3 feet into natural soils
70 12 Cla e Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
69 12 Sil Sand a roxiinatel 3 feet into natural soils
46 13 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
68 11 1/2 Sil Sand a roximatel 3 feet into natural soils
35 13 Sil Sand a roximatel 2 feet into natural soils
67 10 1/2 Clayey Sand approximately 2 1/2 feet into natural soils
boulder encountered at bottom
28 11 Silty Sand approximately 2 feet into natural soils
boulder encountered.at bottom
9 13 1/2 Silty Sand approximately 2 feet into natural soils
lar e boulder encountered at 11 feet
Braun Intertec also observed some of the quality control testing provided by Peterson Contractors, Inc.,
including DCP testing near the upper surface of the geopiers and one Bottom Sta.bilization test. The
results of both of these tests observed appeared acceptable. The Dynamic Core Penetration Test was
observed on Geopier #48 with 50 blows for less than l.inch. The Bottom Stabilization test was
performed on Geopier #34 with the following results 2 inches, 1 1/2 inches, 7/8 inclies, 1/2 inch.
Conclusions
Based on our observations and the design parameters we were provided, it appears that the geopiers we
observed were properly constnicted, of adequate shaft length and properly founded in natural soils.
Based on the quality control measures performed by PCI it appears that the contractor followed the
proper procedures for geopier installation.
Mark Gergen & Associates, Inc.
Project BODX-02-328C
January 17, 2003
Page 4
General
Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No
warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
It has been a pleasure providing these services for you on this project. If you have any questions regarding
this report, or, the attached results, please call Jon Busch or Greg Bialon at (952) 431-4493.
Sincerely.
Braun Intertec
on S. Busch
Senior Engineering Assistant
.
L-A
?
Gregory J. Bialon, PE
Associate Principal
?
j sb\gjb: spk\02328\rpt
O. • . s
? - _.. , . . .
.
PEfiERSON C4NfiRACTORS9 INC.
, nUvY & 8rcavvnY corrtRacroas
Pro)ect Name 8
LocatJon;
k n
Gro NAMMW -
aw
mvel°.... ?.._&_,Eaan , MN UsYd:
REVtStON # 9 F+CI ik
.1672
?ocstlon
B? _ GEDPtERS INSTALLED
#
?n9 papp? l3ro?d
Shaft Surtacs Geopi'er iioppievorili ?
Pler Geopior
6ot?
6wpi?
7arnp
inslall
E!
. ft
L ih,tt EI, ft ti
ft
'raP r . e
EI, ft P(annad ?ctuat EI, tG Planned Actuaf
stor? ura
#t 1Y2
rrne?r
Lin
cata
1 9?A
5
.
2 924_5 10
926.00
in
814.5 1150 Z-o 9Z5.S 0.5Q .
3a
,_a
10 926.00 814.5 11.50 1 92?v
5 0
501
10
928.00
914.5
11.90 .
5 .
0
O.SO o 2
2
10 9ZB
00 814
5 1
50 ?
1 _
. . Z,o
_
. 6- (X50 T
10 9Z8.m 914.5 11.6
+{ :
825.5
_ 450 Q
10
1 916.00 814.5 11, ?.. $28.Q 0:50
9 s2e.oo s1a_s -„ ?; I. ? .-: ? ? .. ..? _ -
?
?
?
w
15
917
.-I???, ?Q(pI. - -- - •-L vcv.wf ar.0.o
?;RAVELS B:8AND3
? WeO. 3+`a?d W: WAM Graded
'OOrlyy Graded P: Pooriy Graded
co ,
0
?
n
\ ACI QC REPRESENTATIVE:
.? .
0
r vfV.O Y.G7{l ?:.?5 - 0..? - _ }?' _ Z 1.0 R.
r:
weatter:
GFC 9 P01-PMM40010
• Soil (Ylaterial g D
Iitlo» Erieou
g p
nh"
At T)p 7 T
s?
?
y
?v.ur, ?o s2e.58 0:? p
924;83 1.17
12.17 . .. ? '0 924
83
/- SC
.
o
12.17 ? 3•
- , ?
I
12.17 2; S 924.83 _1.17 1.-0 2 i o t 7 5P
12.17 144•v 924:83 1:17 ?"v z. 30 1-7
12.17 ?170924
o
83 'f:17 t Z S
-
. ? 90 _7
i2.'!7 874.83 1.17 l,u'
_ Iz t) 30 ! -7
rJ? .. St
?
.-
M: SELTS C: CLAYS F: RU88i.E FltL
H: High Plas?eity H: High Plastlcity O: ORGAMIC 8OL3 .
L: Low PlasficRy ,. L: Low Alesticity PT: PEAT SOILS
1/3 OWNER'& QA itEPRESENTA7IVE:
r o> Project Name & .
? Locatlon: ` GrevlMwk
nT§Pmerrt-Eaganj MN Hammar
Usad:
RfVISlON M 1 PC( Ak J672 cFC 0 a02-QMM40010
Laeatlon # eottom
Qeopter QrourW
G
i - E 3€OPIE RS Ii1FS TAl.IE D
Foott
?0
Shaft
SuKace eop
ar
Boltatn ! r plet
??
_"
Msfatl
8oil tria!
? h E!iE Ef, it 7 Stone Lifts Tlme/ p? itlons Er?counbe S P
?
27 923.83 '10 926.00 9f 3.83 *
1
?83 #1 GIK tn Shai! T T
? 823
83 t0 8?. 9t3.83
? ,
823,83 10 928.00
10 M.00 8t 3.83
913
83 ,
f2
1? ,. • 824.83 1.f7 ?. a Z 1 3g t-?
?
30 923.93 40 828.? .
8f3.83 .
12.f7 i- 9?r4.83
9?4
83 1.17 v ''? s
81 r4.83
10 ?
9?.
913.83
12,17 ? .
924
83 1.17
17
1 , c.? 2. Il3 3;, ?
32
33 923.83 10 918.00 913.83 13.17 l30 .
924.803 .
1 5
? 823.93
823
83 10 SZe.i70 913.83 12.17 ; u_
9?4.83 .
1.17
. v Z
? '
- - ,S?yl
.
928
92 10 928.a0 813.83 1Z 17 ? $24-83 1.17 o -
z ? .
? 10 8W .92 816.92 1Q.C0 -27.02 0_00 ? -
?
? 37 •
SM5 90 928.92
10 828
00 918.92 . 10.00 o z o: 927.92 0.00
Y7
;iv
1-7
p
?
97?.6 .
10 9T8.00 9125
812$ 18.50 1.5-
_
13
50
?3.?
2.5C
2„ ? _
' . .. . . .
ca
?
39
922.8
?0 9?8.00
912.5 .
.
u..
-
13.50
?i.?
923.5
ZSEf
2 "
Z: u
.
o ?
41
9=.5
M
$
10 82B.00
912s
13.g0 i?
82`3.5 -
2.50 Z
: S
1 S
?
42 .
M
5 10 928.00
10 812.5 13.60 i3:-u
923.5
2.5p
',; S
Z
y -
_ S
43 . 9 2 8.00
90 9Z8.00 812.5
?'l2
5 1 3.5? __
13
5Q
: s?:s
i 2 .50
_ x,$ _ __
S26.OG .
9125 .
. s
. ..
13,60 3.5 2.5Q
-7
?
48 .6 70 9?e.CO 8'12:8 13.60 . _?
?7 9225
922
3 10 8?t9.00 912.8 'l3.60 ?
?.3
2.50 .
s z o '7
_ .. _.... ...._ • --... .
?
'? ,
8?2,5 10 $Z@.00
10 8Z6.00
912,5
812
8
13.30 .
.. .
7
_
S
N ?
so sV.s to eza.oo .
912s M:t 2.50 .
2.60 • .?
??x ,z
?
51 @22.5
SZZ
5 1Q .9Z6.00 8128 93.30
923.5
2.50
- 3v -7
"
52 .
822.5 10 8?8,00
10
618
00 9'l2.5
9i25 13.80
2:y
2.
30
1=?
?
"
503
`
922.3 .
10 928.?
912.
5 13.50
f 8.50 36 :5
823
5 2.50
2
50
!.
ra ?4
sg 922.5 10 92A.W 812_5 .:
13.50
3. .
923
5 .
2.50 . 2`5
?.... 2. U 30 •? ? s
.T?s1
w
sa 82Z.6
922
5 10 928.Q0 912.5 13.50 ,
923.3
2.50
,
? ? -
Z o .
?
57 .
622.5 10
928.00
10 928
00
912$
923.5 _
2.50
'Z - -
-+ ? 822.5 .
10 926.00 812.5
812.5 13,5Q
13
50 3' 823,5
9 2?
. 3v
?
?.S
!0 828.00
912.5 .
a
13
50 23.6 250 i
Z
?
-4 L
S
60
822.5
10 826.00
9125 :
,
13
50
823.5
250 z
,S x
61
?
?,5 .
1G .826,00 8125 13.50 IN.v 923.5
923
5 2.5p
2
5Q - fi _
' O-"
' o Z9
?
o 9225 10 926.00 9125 13;50 ? _ .
92:i.5 .
250 ? w • ? . .
? PCI GC REPRESENTATlVE:
--
° 2J3 OWNER'S CA R£PRESENTATNE:
O• y
?
?
?
M
??ed Nm@ 8 NafM111li
l.oc8tion: G?eYitawk r,t E rt MN
U9?:
KCVISIOW # 1 PCI M J672
?tian I a GEOPlERS lNSTALLED
GFC # P02-pMM40010
.. l
I1?
e9
.I
ri
IN--I
W
M
O
ti
.a
?
v-4
0
PCI QC REPREBENTATNE:
33ei33
OWNER'S QA REPRESENTATNE:
u li-"iu3 FRI 11:35 FAg 319 345 2658 '
. FSC-HOOR Buti,ul,.?, i
,
FOUNDATION $ERVICE C
ORp.
Pro!'ect Name:
?1'4T ft. .. I-v?..
FSC Projec# Number: '
L., -7 7-
BottO?n Stabifization Test RAt-.....j
- •- • ...., t,yai i meaQtllg:
psi
Tamper Shaft
Geopier Installer.
?a?. A,crl
? .. ..
Tamper Foot #: -
QC Monitor:
«V.
1 QCotIA?Yl,a.4L.- -- ' - - - _. •.. .- ?1wtrvmeter Test Qa..,,...,
-
aKAUN
INTERTEC
m
A Summary Report of Geopier Installations for
Mark Gergen & Associates, Tnc.
Proposed Greyhawk Development
Lots 1 through 4, Block 2 Eagan, Minnesota
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my-,
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
,
Gregory J. Bialon, PE -
Associate Principal
Registration Number: 24017
Project BODX-02-328C
January 17, 2003
Braun Intertec Corporation
Providing engineering and environ.mentaI solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
January 17, 2003
Mr. Mark Gergen . '
Mark Gergen & Associates, Inc.
18004 Jacquard Path
Lakeville, MN 55044
Dear Mr. Gergen:
Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952.431.4493
6950 West 146th Street Fax: 952.431.3084
Suite 131 Web: braunintertec.com
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Project BODX-027328C
Re: Summary of Geopier Observations, Proposed Greyhawk Addition, Lots 1- 4, Block 2, Eagan,
Minnesota As requested, we have performed geopier observations on a paxt-time basis at the proposed Greyhawk
Addition for the townhome building at lots 1 through 4 of block 2. The purpose of the geopier
obs.ervations was to document the soil conditions near the bottom of the geopiers and observe the
contractor's placement techniques and quality control. Available Information
We were provided with a boring log (B-2) prepared by,Allied Test Drilling Company under number
02012. Backhoe test pits were performed in the proposed building pad, which were observed by Braun ,
Intertee. Up to 13 feet of fill was encountered in these test pits. The fill soils observed in the test pits
appeared to be unsuitable for building support. We recommended removal of the unsuitable fill soils and
replacement with engineered fill or utilizing a deeper foundation system like Geopiers. ,
We were provided a copy of a Geopier Soil Reinforcement Plan for the building at lots 1 through 4 of
block 2. The plan was dated Decerriber 26, 2002 and was submitted by Geopier Foundation Company:
This plan indicated the placement of 74 geopiers throughout the proposed building. The proposed
geopier locations were staked by a surveyor prior to our arrival on-site.
"A Design Submittal for: Geopier Building Support" prepared by Geopier Foundation Company, dated
December 25, 2002 under project P02-PMM-0010 was provided. The Quality Control Packa.ge in the
design submitted indicated the piers should go through the existing fill and 2 feet into the underlying
brown silty clay. A minimum shaft length of 10 feet was required.
Proposed Construction
The proposed townhome building will be a two story, slab-on-grade structure with a finished floor
elevation varying from 926.6 to 928.0 feet. The design specifications submitted by Geopier Foundation
Company indicates that the maximum wall loading is expected to be a maximum of 3 kipsninear foot
and that the allowable design bearing pressure after the proper placement of geopiers is not greater than
4500 psf. -
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
ow ow o?
vm.<ux . v:o.cA01d0u. v.o.w.o.
Q° ?0 °? ?0•
1 2 s 3 4 5 6 7 B 9
-.
?
28 5 ?- 6
69
? 51
10
? c.
VA
J ?
T `
? ,
27
30 31
33
? 36
41 44
47 47
5 53
SS
5 SB 64
62
6
5 _
1
3 • 5 . ? 3
3 e 1 9 4 ? 48 5 0 e 9 [61 66
-/' S• ? 1 0'J' -1' 7-6' 10-/' -/ -6' I -Y I -S• •?....
26
•
?'-
?
r
s . 12
i_z? -
5 38 qp 12 49 51 3 60 4 17
7
ux Awrto
un?im
u?¢o
. un?m .
q 23 y 1 20 19 18 17 15 14
S.g• -1 9'-5'
GEOPIER SOIL REINCEMENT PLAN
scnLE: i/a'=r-o°
GEOPIER NOtES:
i. The design, location, site, and spacing of,_Ibe_Geopier foundofion system-ore ;
described on Ihs drawing aod deloils. /My modiiicaGon in size antl spocing ot the
J
Geapier elemenl layout sfiall nal 6e allorred-withou!`appraval by the system desigri
(Geopier Foundation Compony-Midwesf Chades Nlgaod 763=592=5340). '
2. Should ony obslmdioq inciuding but nof limited fa boulders, limbeis, concreie,
asphalt, large roots, eic. be encounlered which prevent plocing the element io the
reqmred depfh, or causes the aggregole pier !o drift from the required Iawlion, the
obstruction shall be removed by the Geneml Contractar. The ezcavalion sholl be
back f71ed by the General Contraclor wilh suiloble materiols ond sulfcienlly campocted,
in ader to coolinue with instauation of the aggregole pier.
If wet, soft or sensilive soiis are present ot 6oltom of pier excovation, open graded aggregole
shall he_placed ond compocted lo sfobilize the,pier boltom and_ moy serve as.lhe initiol Iiit.
4. The cenfer ol each oggregate pier sMall be within 6 inches oi the p(anned bcafian?
indicaled; unlesr-appraved-by-thesystem designeZ Foundalion d"emenl's installed
oufside of the above foleronce and deemed not lo be acceploble, shoil be rebuill
at no odtlilianal ezpense lo Ownec Alher remedial measures may be used as
opproved by the system designer.
-- ----------- ----_.. _.. --.._.__ ..,
5.( layoul oi all aggregofe pier lacollons shall be conducfed by a quolified
\ surveyor retained by the Ceneral Contwctar.? --- -/
?'--
6. FaoGng areas sholl be properly prepared failowing eMCOVation and priar !o roncrele
pMcement. All ercavat'ions for foohng bottoms direcfly supported by aggregate
piers shoil be prepared as follows:
A. ihe excava(ian shail be lim;ted l0 3 inches helow the botfam of faaling elevafioq_excav_oiian shaq_be_occom,plished..usiog_o_smoallt.bucket.
B. The dslurhed surface soils and,tap of pier elemenis shall be ?
recampacted?rvatcordance wAh-tecammendolionr of the geblechnical
?mgineer. Durinq wel canditions, where compaction is nol achievahle,
all dislurbed saifs shall be remrned.
C. A standard impoct compacfor such as o"whacker or jumping jack"
shall be used lo compoct the loose suAace al the uggreqote pler.
D. All foundations bearing sudaces shall be observed and approved by the
geolechoical engineer priar fa placemenl ol cancrele.
7. All abave aod below graund utilifies shall be locoled, cleady marked, and relocated
as necessory prlor lo iastallalion of Geopier elemenis.
8. The ollowoble design hearing pressure tor this Geopier projecl is up la 4,500 PSF.
J
?
SCHEDULE OF 30" GEOPIER ELEMENiS
GEOPiER TOP Of GEOPIEA REOUiRED
i tHau sa _,io._o.
F7 iNGll 74 _0l_5. lo,'Q•
' 10 feet minimum, and shouW penelmle thiough the
existing lill inlo undedying clay ai least 2 led
Y
?
?
i
[ IF
?
?
?
iYPICAI SECTION @ GEOPIER ELEMENTS
-
. I hereDy cerlify thal Ihie plen, specilkolian pr reparl
was prepareE Oy me or untler my tlirect superNSian
and Ihot I am a dWy Peqistered Prolessionol Englneer
runEei tlie-laws'o(-lM-StGte_of_Minnesoto-.. .
-,. _
---
Charies M. AiyooE, Jr. pAiE ....? - " -?
Req. xo. 43692
Pagn or sheels covered Dy tnfs seol:
?
rc
a °
0
s
i
a
V
x
?
? o
ym?
E
c =
?
i
U W
U
0
a
?
v?M
o
u o ? 4
01'°
3 -?
U
x
a
Cf
SNEii NUWBEfl
CEO 1
SCatE
0
o ?
0
0
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 g
? .?.?.?.. ?. , ?....,.
28
" _ 5 57
-
? ?
10
u
?
myEo?eo 9"XCAVA'
•
0
?
? W,? ?
27
JO 31
?33 ?6
41 44
? 43 41
L 53 ?
5 55 ? 64
61
bg
1
\ ?
3 e 1 42 e 48 5 0 ,• 9 61
\ ss
., . .. . . ... ...
.{ ?. ._. .
26 ^` 12
_ ?'._ •
5 38 40 2 49 51 ?
1J
71
u1EX AvAl[D ux?rto u c3 rta ux :4 0
12
4 23
p
21 20
19
8 17
?g
-
- - 14
r '-e -s• ,u-r s-r
T
?n-r
6'-1'
A- • I1-1
?
L
GEOPIER SOIL REINCEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1/g"=1'-p"
GEOPIER NOTES:
1. The design, locafion, size, and spacing ol-the_Ceopier-Foundotion systemare
described an Ihis drawing and details. ( Any modilicotian in site and spocing o( the
-
Geopier elemenl layout sfiall not 6e allowed.wilhoutk approval by the sysfem designer .
(Geopier Fountlation Campany-Midwesl Chades Nlgood 763=592-5340).
2. Shauld ony obstroction, iocluding 6ul not limiled lo Goulders, timbers, concrefe,
asphalt, lorge roals, etc. be enwuntered which prevenl placing the elertrent to the
required deplh, a causes the aggregale pier to dnll fram the required localion, the
obsiruction shall be removed by the General CoNroctoc The ezcavufian shall be
bock lilled by the General Confraclor wifh suitable maleriuls ood suffic;entty compacted,
fn order to coolinue wilh inslallalion of the aggregate pier.
I( wef, soft or sensitive soils ore present al bottam o( pier ezmvation, apen graded aggregate
shall be Qbced and_compocted.lo_stahiGze the.pier bottom and may_serve as the indial h(t.
4. The cenler of each oggregate per shall be within 6 inches ol the ptonned laation
i41cated; untess appraved by the syslem tlesigner. Foundalion elemenfs inslolled '
aulside ol the aGove talerance ond deemed not to te accepiahle, shall be rebuilt
al no addilional e»pense to Ownef. Other remedial measures may be used as
approved by the ryslem designec S.? Layout af all aggregole pier lacoflons shali be conducled by a quaflied
?surveyoc_reiained by the Ceneral Conlractar. f
6. Footing areas sholl be properly pceparetl lollowing ezcavolion aod prior lo concrele
placement. All excwations lor looling bafiams direcfly supported hy aggregate
piers shall be prepored as fallows:
A. The eMCavalion shall be limiled la 3 fnches helow the holtom of laoling
elevotion, excavatian shall be accomplished using a smoolh bucket.
8. Thefsturbed surlace soils and (op of pier elemenfs shall De ?
,'recompacled in-xmrdonce-wilh letommendations of the geotechnical
-engineer.- Ounnq wei condilians, where compaclion is nol achievable,
all disfurbed saifs shall be remaved.
C. A standard impacl compactor such as o"whocNer or jumping jack'
shall be used lo compacf the loose surfoce of the aggregafe pier.
D. AU foundafians bearing surloces shall be observed and appraved by the
geotechnical engineer priar Io plocemenl of concrele.
7. WI abave and 6elow ground ulililies shall he locoled, clearly marNed, ond ralocated
as aecessory prior lo installalian of Ceopier elemenls.
8. The allowa6le design bearing pressure lor Ihis Geopier prajecl is up fo 4,500 PSF.
M
-1
SCHEDULE OF 30" GEOPIER ELEMENTS
CEOPIER i0P OF CEOPoER REOINRED
1 THfll1 66 -4'-4? 10'-0'
61 iHRU 74 -0'-5 10'-0'
' IO teei minlmum, antl should penetiole Ihrough the
exating lill into undeAying clay al knsl 2 leet
?
3
3S
?
?
C
Y
TYPICAI SECTION @ GEOPIER EIEMENTS
I nereey c<dlly Inot Ih;, plon, speciGcoUon or repart
wos prepereC Cy me or un0er my Oirect supervlsion
anE thal I am o 0uy Reqlstae0 Vroleesaaol Engineer
? undef-the.luws_ol.the.Stclect-Minne9ola _
r
?
"Choda N. Allgoad, Jc OATE
Reg. No. 23692
Pages ar 1heNS covere0 by ihis seal:
?
a
? o
0
z
a
W
u¢
6
0
y a =
3 ?
E
i
i
U w
i
i
o
d ?e
? ?.
a`
ia
I GEO I I
I I/8'°1'-0' I
o
0
?•-0• ? - ? -
,_
? 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
_
5
6
57
io
28
.'
?
? Ex<?? .?.
27
\
JO 31
73 , 36
41 44
43 ? 47
S 53
55 11, SB 64
62
65 _
?
3 5 . 5 J
3 7 4 e ? 48 50 5 ? ? 9 61 66
1. Y C 10'-4.
•.1'
-6' 10'-1'
-f
I-
10'•5' '
-?'
26 ? t-S ?LL
r_i , 1Z
r-:' -
5 71
UNEMC VAIED 38 qp
u?? ko 49 51
u? c??v m 60 J4 13
uK??"9'c°
q 23 y 1 20 19 18 17 15 14
. - ? b
S.•e• 9'•y ip_
6V"4- g.y
10'-Y
8'-4' g- ?-f
9,-57
'W'r
m
GEOPIER SOIL REINCEMENT PLAN
SCAIE: 1/8"=1'-D'
CEOPIER NOTES:
i. ihe design, lacolion, site, and spocing of Ihe Geopier foundolion system are
'
describetl on this drawmg and deloils. !Any modii¢alion in siie and spacing af the
Geapier element layout shall not 6e allowed_withoul approvol hy the syslem designer ?
(Geapier Foundotion Compony-Midwest Chotles Nlgood-763-592-5340): " -
2. Should ony obslmction, including 6ul not limited la houlders, timhers, concrete,
asphalt, large roals, elc. be encounlered which prevenf placing the elemenl ta '.' ;e
reqwred depth, or causes the aggregoie pier lo dri(t from the required localion, the
ahstruclion shall be removed by the Geneml Canlrador. ihe eacavalion sholl he
back filled by the General Conlracfor with suitable materiols anE sufficiently compocted,
in order to cantinue wilh insfallotion af the aggregale pier.
If Wel, soft or sensiiive soils ore present al botlom ol pier excmatian, open gwded oggregate
shall be placed and campacted fo stabilite the pier hollom and may serve os the Initial hlt.
4. The cenler ol each aggregale pier shull he within 6 inches ol the planned locatian ?
in8icated; unless appraveQ by the syslem designer. foundalion elements inslolted '
pulside of the above foleronce and deemed nol fa be asceplable, shall 6e rahuiR
al na additional ezpense to Ownec Other remediol measures muy he used as
apprmed by the system designer.
- -- - - -
5. r Layouf o( all aggregate pier localions sholl be conducted by u qualilied j
survey.o,r,lelained by the Ceneral Contmctor. ? --
6. Faoling areas shall be properly prepared following ercavalion and prior (o concre(e
placemenl. All excavat'ians for looting boffoms direcfly supported by aggregale
piers ehall Ee prepared as lollaws:
A. The eMCavation sholl be limiled l0 7 inches belaw the bot(om ol looling .
elevalion, ezcovalion shall be accomplished using_a smaofh bucket.
8. The(disfurbed surfuce soJS and lop af pier elements shall be
lrecompactetl in•occordance wifh recommendations of lhe-geolechnical
:.engineer.- Dunnp wei conditions, where compaction is nol achievoble,
all dislurbed soifs shall be removed.
C. A sfandard impocl compactor such as o'whocker or jumping jack"
shall be used lo compad the loose suAoce of the aggreqafe pler. .
D. NI foundations beoring surfuces shall be abserved and oppraved by the
` gealechnical engioeer pnor lo placement ol concrefe.
7. All above and belaw graund ufiliCies shall be located, clearly morked, ond reloaoled
os necessary prior lo inslollalion ol Geopier elements.
8. The allowable design beoriog pressure lor Ihis Geopier projeci is up l0 4,500 PSF.
-1
?_J
SCHEDULE Of 30° GEOPIER ELEMENTS
R OUiREO
GEOPIER i0P Of CEOPIEfl
i tHau ee _4'_4• ia'-o'
67 iHRU 11 10'-0"
' 10 leel mnimum, ond sM1ould penetmte Ihrough the
eristing IBI into uMerlying clay at leasl 2 feel
Y
?
i
8gg
?
?
?
iYPICAL SECTION @ GEOPIER ELEMENTS
. I nereby certify thal Inis plan, specilicatlon or repon
wos praporeE Ey me or unaer my alrect su0ervsion
anC Ihol I am o 0uly Reqislered Prolesslonal Englneer
/unEeP ttie tawsof the-Stotao( -Minnesoto. ?
ltharles M. Allgood, Jr. DATE
Reg. No. 23692
Pages or seeets cwnea ey ma sem:
$
?
0
a
i
a
? N.
.4,; ° z
E
c
?
r
U W
i
o ?-
u-?y
os?o
u --
a
JCF
cEO i
SGLE
I/8'=I'-p'
0
o,
o,
0
0
f p 3 4 5 6 1 8
?
28
7 5 - -
.?, \ 57
; '
'
0
?y ? `Yf°i m ic 69, X??? u? . z?
27
30 31
3 ? 36
41 4a
43 47
5 53
SS ` 58 69
62
65 c
3 S
H
I 5
6
3
3 ? 7 9 42 48 ? 5 9 61 66 -
?
.
•1'
Y-' ID'-?' `
-1'
S•A' 1C-f
.
-f
Y-' i7-S
10'-5'
•?'
`
.
26 . nu ?_ _5 5 '
b Y'
1..1 . "LL 12
i t
5 )g q0 72 qg 9 3 60 4 13
71
?F v,nEa
ux cev ¢o
un?rv m
?v co
ti
q 23
y
21 30
19
18 11
16 15
?
5-e' b
. 9'-' IC-Y
6'-/'
9'•5'
IP-
6.1•
GEOPIER SOIL REINCEMENT PLAN
scA.E: 1/8'=i'-0'
CEOPIER NOTES:
1. The design, localion, siie, and spacing o(-lhe'Geopier Eoundotion_syslem_pre_
descriCed on lhis dmwing and delails.( Any modilicalion in site ontl spacing of lhe?
Ceopier elemeol layouf sBall not 6e ollowed wlhuut opprovol h?lhe system des?gner '
(Geopier Foundailon Comparry-Uldwesl Charles Nlgoa8-763-592-5340). - -
2. Slwuld any obstrudian, including bul nal Ilmiled to boulders, timhers, concrele,
asphalt, large roats, etc. he enmuntered whieh prevenf placing the element io the
required deplh, or causes the aggregate pier ia drift Irom the required location, the
obsiruclion sholl be remaved by the Geneml Conlractor. The eXcavafian shall be
back lilled by the Ceneral Confractor wilh suitable maferiols and sullicienfly campacfed,
in order to coniinue wlfh Inslailalian af the aggregale pier.
I( wet, soft a sensitive soils are preseni al baftom of pier excavation, open graded aggregote
shall be placed and com,pacted_to slabilite the pier bollam and may, serve as the inilial Idt.
?
4. Thecenter of each aggregaie pier shall 6e within 6 mches ol the plonned laatlan
m iCated,-unlessapproved bylhe syslem-designeC Founddtion'el'e'menfs iostallef ?
oufside af the ahave lolerance and deemed nof lo be agceptable, shall be rebuilt
oi no oddifional ezpeose to Ownec Olher remediul measures moy be used as
approvetl by the syslem designer.
5. Layout al all aggrego(e pier locaiions shall he conducted_hy a qualified ?? --- - /
suneyor reloined by the Generol Contraclac ,
?-- -_----- _?
6. FooCiog meas shail be properly prepqred lallowing excmation ond priar to concrete
plocemenl. All excrnat'?ans for iootinq hallams duectly supporled by aggregate
p'iers shall be prepared as follows:
A. ihe eacavation shall be limi(ed to 3 inches below the boflom of looting
elevofion, excavation shall_be,qccompl_ished ufing a.smoolh,huckel.
B. The dislurbed suriacesoils and lop of pier elemenls shall be j
recompacted inracwrdonce-wifh recommeadalions-at the gealechnical
Lengineec.-Durinq wet condilions, where campacGan is nol achievable,
oll daiurhed soits shall be removed.
C A slandard impact wmpaclor such as a"whacker or jumpioq jack'
shall be used lo campacl the loose surface ol the aggreqate pier.
D. NI laundatians bearing surfaces shall be observed and opprmed by the
geolechnicol eogineer prwr to plocemenl ol concrele.
7. NI above ond belaw graund ulilities sholl be located, clearly marked, and relocaied
as necessary priar (o installolian al Geopier elements.
8. The altawable design beoring pressure lor fhis Ceapier project is up to 4,500 PSF.
?
SCNEDULE OF 30" GEOPIER ELEMENTS
GEOPIER i0P OF GEOPIEA REOUIREO
1 iHRU 66 _4,_4• 10' 0•
67 iHRU 74 -p'-S.
' 10 leet minimum, ond should penelrnte Ihrough the
eKisfinq IBI inlo undttlyirq dq ot leasl 2 leet
Y
?
3
i?
?
k
TYPICAL SECTION @ GEOPIER ELEMENTS
I I nereey certHy Inot tnu plon, svecilicollon pr report
was preparetl Oy me or unaer my Enect supervfsfon
on0 Ihot I om o Euly Registered Profeesional Englneer
; under-the lawscf the State_ot Minnesota
?
?
Charies M. Allgoad; J?.- - -- ?-DA1E?
Reg. No. 23692
Poges ar sheets cmered by this seal: '
?
U
O
w
x
?
: o
? p N
? O Z
i ?
E
o =
?
i i
?
u o ? 4
o ? E o
c
? x
JCF
I CEO 1 I
I/8'=1'-D.
, JAN!,17.2003 11:22AM BRAUN INTERTEC
0.003?.2/6 - -
i
A Summary Report of Geopfer jn,st&llationa for
Mark Gergen & Associates, Inc.
PiopoSed Gwyhaavk Deveiopr`eat
Lats I ftaugh. 4, 81ock 2
Eagau, Miumota
• .. ?Y?.?f ? i?. ?
Traf'eah"Cafflwaden:
I herebg matify that tbia phn, speciftatwx
or ropvrt was prepared by me or under my
direct supervisian and thet Iazn a duly
Lic=wd. 8ugineer under the 1a,wa of the
State of M[innesota,
?
V
Gregory J. Hialon, PE
Associate Priwipal
F.egistratiaa Number: 24017
' Projeot HODX-02-328C
Janttary 17, 2003
Bratm Iitertsc Crnporaiion
JAN.17.2063 • 11:2CAM BRAUN INTERTEC --1V0.003---P.3/6-
sRauN
INTERrEc
Broun Inialeo Cerporet'ian
8950 West 346ih Slrcot
Suirc 131
Apple Volley, MN 55124
Phone; 952.491,4493
Fax 952.431.3084
We6: blquninreftc.com
January 17,2003
Mr. Mark f3ergen
Mark Ciergen 8c Assoaiates, Inc.
, 18004 Jacquard Path; . .
? Lakeville, MIN 55044
Doar W. Gagcm;
Projeot BQL1X-02-328C
Re; Surmaary of Geopier Qbscrvationa, Ftoposed Gieyhawk Add€tiori, Lots 1- 4, Block 2, Bagan,
Mianesata
As requeated, we vm perfomed geopier observations on a part-tune basis at th,e proposed Creyhawk
A.ddition for the toova?om buildting at lofs l iimugh 4 of blocrlc 2. The purpoae af fhe geapi,er
obsemtions was ta document the soil conditions near the bottam of the geopierss and observe the
contrutar's placement tec}Yniques aad qualiiy cantral,
Avaflable Iniormatfon
We weroproeid6d with a;boring Iog (8-2) prepared bY A11ied Teet Drilling C.onipeny undex number
02012. Bacld?oe'test pits were paf'ormed in the groposed buildiag Aad, which we;e observod by Braun
Iatertec. Up to 13feet of fi11 was encouatcred is1 these test pits. The fill goils observeid in the test pite
appea-eci to be unsuitabie far building support. We recornmended removal of the unsuitablc fill soils and
replacement with emgincered 13ll or utiliziag a deeper fouadatian syftm like GcQpiers.
We were provided a copy of a Geopier gail lteinfcncement Plan fnr fi,b,e building at lots 1 through 4 of
block 2. Thc plsn w:s datod Dwember 26, 2002 and was subrnitted by Gieopierr Foundation Compaay.
Thie plan izvdicated the p1acement o#' 74 gcopiers tbrnughout the praposed building. Tb,e proposed
geapier locatioxis wore staked by a euiveqor prior to our arrival aa-sft,
eeA Llesiga SLibmittgl foz; `{3cOp1eT $uildkg 3"upW'p0.qp8rE+d'bY C#eppier FC13t1datiW3 G'mpmmy, dated
Deoemher 25; 2002 umder projeat POI-PMM-001Q was provided. Thc Quality Control Paalggc in the
design submitbed iadicated *e piers should ga ftough the existixag fi11 and 2 feet intQ the tuiderlyiry.g
brown silty c1ay. A maaiinum ahaft length of 10 feet was required.
Proposed. Con$tructQon
The prapoged townbome bttil.diag ovill be a two sbory, alab-on-grade gruoture with a, ftshed' floar
elmtiori varying from 926.6 t0 928:0 €eet, ne desip spccMoatians laubmitted by Cieopier Foimdation
ComPaay indicates ftt the mu+m++, wai],loadittg is expected ta be a maxim= of 3ldpa/limeax foot
and ftt tbe allowable deeign bearing Pressure after the proper placement of geopiars is riot greatsr then
4500 psf.
Praviding 8ngtnee7ing dnd enuirorimeniat soluetons since 1957
. JAN.17.2003 11:22AM BRAUN INTERTEC "N0.0O3-'-P.4/6
Mark Gexrgen & ,Associatcs, Inc.
Projeot BODX-02-328C
]'aYlUary 17, 2403
Page 2 Ceopfer Qbservatfm
ASenfor $ngineering Assistant obscrved the camst.vctiaa af a nuznbrr of geogiers an ranuary 7 and S,
2043, The gevier oboervatiooas cansiated vf observing fihe soile removed from a number af the geapicr
locations and dacumentiag pier depth and bottom soil *pe. Based on the auger cuttiags observed during
fhe drilling; of the get#piera, the picrs Htaurt Iubertec observed exftded 2 or izlore fm inio't1ie underI'yimg
natural saady lean clay, alayey sand and silty eand soils. The geapier obamvations are surmnarized in the
tables ahown below.
T??I_
GreyhaWk Der?eLapment
Geapfien Observed by 8rann Intertec
t3n daaaaay 7, 2003
h 4
N?er f? 1?om? o?
I3 3 with s oximat?l 2 t iato natt,u2l sail
' 74 14 Lean Cis a ' 2 fee# into mMmal soils
1 C aad -ammalWely 2 feet ' turaI soils
73 12
, il .8and
ximatel na o' s
' S 1 12 , gand aRitW 1 a Lyt into nabxw .
. 49 121/2 SiI 3and a x=
te feet into ?flis
SG 13 Sil A 1 3 I12 fee ' ta ' Mtkg
doilo
S 121 ar?d -
at6AIMLt-ly 3 'to nai" a'1 ` feet
54 131/2 511 RummimgLtclv 2 feet into nounsl soils
48 13 Siky and ' teI 2 fSct ' ta na
42 1 Sand -avmmimtcAv eet into nabmL
ils
/2 9?1 a 2 f t' tural goils
9 15 mtv
smd- a 'teI 2 f ' to MLhlw go'
37 13 %s -
siltv-sand ' tel 2 fect into nab=l ' s
? 1 imatel z into natgmlmgs
?
?9 .. l i
is
13 Cta
Cla
gaud ximatel inbo na so' s
2 feet inta soils
a o' 1 2 fee ' nawraI '
JAN.17.2003 11:23AM BRAUN INTERTEC
?k CiergC?,! $c ASSOCiSiteB, Inc,
Projeot BODX.02-328C '
Jgauary 17,2003
Pagc 3
Braun i,atertm also ab=Ted aomie of the quality coaxtsol testing provided by Peterson Contractors, Ino.,
inalu.ding DCp tesdng rim the uPper stufce af the popiers aad one Bottam Stabilizatiaai test. The
results of both of tbesc tests observed appeared acceptable. Tw Dyn$mic Core Peaatration Tcst wa$
obaemd on Geopier #48 with 50 biows far less than 1 iach. The Bottom Stabiliaation test was
pm'forn?ed on C3eapier #34 With the follvwing resulfis 2 incles, l 1/2 inchcs, 7/8 inclves,ll2 inch.
ConcIuefons `
Based on our observat#ons and the deeign p==ft" we wwe provided, it appears that the geopicrs we
observed were properly constrvcted, of adequate ghaft length and properly frnmded iri naturaa soiio.
Based on ihe quuali.ty contral measares perrffornLed by PCZ it appeaxs tlzafi the contractar fallowed the
proper proaedures for geopior iastallation.
JAN.1?.2@?3 11:23AM BRAUN INTERTEC
0. 003---P . 6/6-
MWk (3erg+m & Asaociates, Iric.
Projcct BQDX'02-328C
danuary 17, 2003
Page 4
('eneral
Services pftftmed b3' 'Che goftknrA en$iueers for thie project have been nonducted vviith that lewl of
carc and Wdll ordauagy examsed by membexs of the professiam oenrently practicing in thia arca. Na
warraatYr exprawd or fwpiiW, is made. .
Yt Iiaa beea a plftom provici*g them' gervicea for you an this gsoject, If you liave'any questioas reprding
this report, ar the attaaled reoul.ts, pleaae call Jon Buch Qr Crreg $ialon at (952) 431-1493.
9itcerely ,
BraUn httec Ca?atian .
' Senior Enginceritig A,esistant
,
?`6A?
Oregory J. Bialon, PE
Asoociate Fdmcipai
iBb?rocaPtc\aasas*
v
Site address Lot Block Subd.
On April 15, 2000 the Minnesota Energy Code, Categoryil Ruilding Requirements for insulation protection, air
tightness, and ventilation, was adopted. As a result, the City of Eagan is requiring that the following information be
submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
_ This structure: is constructed to meet minimum requirements of the Mn Energy Code, Chapter 7670 e•-w
OR
? This structure: will be constructed to meet more restrictive requirements of Chapters 7672 or 7674
APPLIANCE GAS ELEC MANUFACTURER MODEL BTU'S VENTING TYPE
water Heater 1,[
?. 2?l?/-?yy?
e-r-v" -?? v ? o r. ? ?i' ;??, G?•?,
Furnace ? L4VI n O ? U 1? - ?l S' L 3 wa-D
Dryer ?Jo fll
EXHAUST SYSTEM
LOCATION
TYPE
MODEL
CFM's VENTED
YES No
Kitchen kitchen C (L6 ' Z? 2 Z-a
Bathroom 1
Bathroom 2 v 6? So X
Bathroom 3 ? S v
Bathroom 4
Other
FIREPLACE S
LOCATION
GAS
WOOD
MANUFACTURER
MODEL
BTU'S VENTING
DIRECT ATMOS
? /',,`??e"
'`i""?'l"l l? ,/ ?/
MAKE-UP AIR MODEL TYPE CFM's
I hereby acknowledge that the abov '6'formation is correct and ree to comply with the Minnesota Energy Code and City of Eagan
requirements.
Signatur,e` , "01P) ? Date
Co any Name
* This form is the responsibility of the General Contractor.
Address: 4172 Raptor Rd
Lot: 1 Block:2
Subdivision: Greyhawk
Zip: 55122
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE/WERE NOT COMPLETE AT FINAL INSPECTION ON
Yes No Comments
Final grade - 6" from siding i 419 17; ? 111?9 4,f 6? 3?'71-1
Permanent steps - garage
Permanent steps - main entry
Permanent driveway
Permanent gas
Sod/Seeded lawn
Trail/curb damage
Porch
Lower level finish si, Ag 0,t. alt.,o
Deck X
Fireplace ,x
Verify with your builder that roof test caps from the plumbing system have been removed.
Turn off water supply to the outside lawn faucets before freeze potential exists.
Call the City's Engineering Department at 651-681-4645 priar to working in right-of-way or installing
irrigation system.
BUILDING INSPECTOR
cd/bidginsp/forms/2002/final inspection checklist
GEOPIE)e Foundation Company - Midwest
Design Submittai for:
Geopier Buiiding S?upport
?
For:
Grey Hawk Development - Building 1
DiffI+ey Road & Blackhawk Road
Eagan, Minnesota
Project Number:
P02-PMM-00010
Prepared for: Peterson Contractors, lne.
geopier
December 26, 2002
GEOPIER° Foundation Company - Midwest
"The Alternative to Deep Foundations"
December 26, 2002
Mr. Doug Clark, P.E.
Peterson Contractors, Inc.
P.O. Box A
Reinbeck, lowa 50669
Design Submittal for Geopier Building Support
Proposed Grey Hawk Development - Building 1
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Clark,
g?piff 0
GEOPIEF,'O Foundation Company - Midwest has completed the Geopier foundation and floor
slab support design for the Greyhawk Development - Building 1 to be constructed in Eagan,
Minnesota. The design is based on soil boring logs provided by the client, and estimated
structural loads by our in-house structural engineer using the provided building sections.
Design calculations and the Quality Control Package are included in this submittal. The
construction drawing has been forwarded to you electronically, and a signed and sealed copy
has been sent to Geopier Foundation Company design office in Blacksburg. Any further
revisions to the construction drawings will be forwarded to both parties. This design has been
reviewed and accepted by Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. - Scottsdale, Arizona.
We are pleased to have provided you with our design services. If you have any questions,
please contact this office.
Sincerely,
ny - Midwest
M•
M -: v -
LIC
ENSED ??9 !
!
ROFESSIONqL ; m
_ ENGINEER '
23692 ?
? J?• JQ,:
:"9?'?••. ??Q?\?
?i ?' •.
?
\
op ........
Attachments: Geopier De4n Calculations
Geopier Quality Control Package
Construction Drawing GEO-1 dated December 26, 2002
cc: Mr. Mark Gergen - Mark Gergen & Associates ?copies)
Dr. Kord ?ssmann, P.E. - Geopier Foundation ompany, Inc. (1 copy)
GEOP/ER DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Page I of -L
--rwo - S+ ?b r.,
0:1d ;
t
FF? t-. 9a8 •o ? . ??,1???
ma ?Gr. ?
?'?.Y' (6A ; -e ?? GW ; 5 a k?? o?l?ss, V
5'k r? ,T Se.?.. lo a '? 's; u cj"?2 ??? ? a t???-?- ? o??'?
G ? C. \!:-y -e y Sa -A , . pD ('a 'JA S' ? a ?-e N?e a "t? S 1 `p ,
O?4 ?l\ ca .
A?;? ? I ?
Qce`\ ' Sd ?---'ps
= ?S f e- ` ; ?-- m -' p f
J:?J qQ O
L4, s)o
?oor s ?? <4 ?-
???
G S ??O ot-` ,S" ?a ?'?"'?.2k. ?? SS a rc?_ .e? ? c? ?c1? b?`"?". C? 4'?,?,?h ,
Co,r.^? 1-6r S'ka,)i h cl?- S 4r
e?
( 'Q b S O ¢ f' ?.e e 2r` -.e
J (°''V,
?- S 0)6 ? f--10-
?
I .-?----
z PROJECT: Grey Hawk Development - Building 1
geopiet LOCATION: Eagan, Minnesota
PROJECT NO.: P02-PMM-00010
Geopier Foundation Company - Midwest DATE: December 26, 2002
5818 Admiral Lane, Minneapolis, Minnesota ENGIN@@R: GharleS M. Allgood, Jr., P.E.
(763) 592-5340 • PAX (763) 592-5339
SENT BY: THE PRO-FIRM;
T0: CHARLES
.
I
?l
?
i
so
?
f?
515 221 9683; DEC-23-02 2:11PM; PAGE 1/1
AT: 17635925339
. , ,
' • ' ` ? ? ? , '?, ?+
?' ? _ ? ? • ,. ', ` ? ?'??,.. ? ? ? ?
?.u
f? ? • ?
• j ' , ? ?i . ? L O ~ 'n ?
• . ' ??
r ?.
f /
Z
i
i ? ? l \!
. ;
c ` f . `?
? ? l r ? ? ,? ? .• f.a? .,?aw-? --?.
v
GEOPIER°"' FOU14Cl8tiOt1 COmpa11y Design Calculatbas - 2-Layer Elastic Lower 2one Analysis
arojecc: Grey Hawk Development - Building 1
Engineer. CMr4
Date: 12/26/2002
3(I.IN BIOMFTFR f:EInPIFR FI FMFN111S• I If:N71 Y.I (T01'1F11 CTRIP Ff1f1TINf:0.
UVail Geopier Allow. Req'd. Select. Req'd. Select. Eqwiv.
? Lower Uqper
Footing Load Cell Footing Geopier Geopier Footing Foofing Ft9 Geqpie Soil Stiffn. Area Geopie UZ Shaft
? 5B Zone Portion Upper Uppac Upper Lower Lewer Lower LZ Total
Number (kips/ Capacify Stress Spacing Spacing Wfdth Width Press. Modui. Modul. Ratio, Ratia, Stress SeEtl. Length Thickn. of LZ z/B I, E zB I, E Settl. Settlement
ift) (kips) (kso (ffi) (ft) (ft) (ft) (kso (pci) (pci) Rs Ra (ksp (in) I (R) (ft) ,(ft) thickn. sigma (ksf) sigma (W (in) (im)
HeaNiest Expecte 2 50 4.5 22,5 12 0.44 2.5 1.28 tli50 8 18J5 0.262 4.2492 0.197 10 12.5 0 0 5 0.064 40 5 0.084 40 0 0.1867218
Bearing Wall Loed
?
?
GEOPIER QUALITY CONTROL PACKAGE
4C?opier-
QUALITY CONTROL PACKAGE for GEOPIER FOUNDATIONS
Project: Greyhawk Development Building 1, Eagan, MN
Project Number: P02-PMM-00010
Geopier Design: Geopier Foundation Company - Midwest
Contacts: Charles Allqood, P.E. (1St) Greg Gear, P.E. (2nd?
Phone: (763)-592-5340 (515)-221-9291
Mobile: (612)-501-8882 (515)-975-8060
Fax: (763)-592-5339 (515)-221-9683
Geotechnical Engineer: Braun Intertec Corporation
Contact: Greg Bialon, P.E.
Phone: (952)-431-4493
Fax: (952)-431-3084
$tructural Engineer:
Referenced Drawings: Geopier Layout Plan GEO-1
Dafe of Drawings: December 26, 2002
Anticipated Geotechnical Conditions:
Dark brown and red-brown clayey sand, silty sand and silty clay fill to about 10-foot depth, underlain by
brown silty clay (natural soil). Groundwater was not found within the Geopier zone.
Potential Anomalies:
None anticipated.
Material To Be Encountered At Bottom Of Shaft:
The piers should go through the existing fill and 2 feet into the underlying brown silty clay. Minimum
shaft length of 10 feet required,
ATTACHMENTS (1) - GEOPIER LOAD TEST INFORMATION
- DAII.Y QUALITY CONTROL FOFtM
- GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION
GEOPIER DAILY QUALITY CONTROL FORM
PCI's current forms may be used. Be sure that QC person notes the soil type that the
Geopier tips out in.
GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION
The boring log and the boring location plan are attached. Please advise if any
additional copies/information is needed.
4C:g:0p1er-
QUALITY CONTROL - ATTACHMENT 1 of 1
GEOPIER MODULUS TEST INFORMATION
Project: Greyhawk Development - Building 1, Eagan, MN
Project Number: P02-PMM-00010
There is no modulus test for this project.
NOV, 5.2002 11:28AM BRALN INTERTEC N0.245 P.4i8
GEOPIER CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
i
N Z
O N
~
~
~o~ i~~ 0~ 4X4 TREATED P0515 4%4 TB6ATED POSfS 4%4 TREATBD P09T3
1Y F001TNG 12' F06TING 12' EOOP[NG 42' BBf.OW GR9DE 42" BBLOW GRADE 42' BELOW GRADE
J m
l~i l~, l~~ p 10 10" ~
0" 12'-2° 13'-2" 13'-0" 13'-0° 13'-0° 13'-0" 12'-8° 12'-8"
1 2 0 '3 4 'S 6 `7 8 9 9 ~
_ - - - - - - - - 0 ~ ~ J I ~
- - - - I C9
~ I ~ i ~ O
i i o i i i i o i i i i _ ~ I i ~ t I ~ P I I Y I I I ~ ~ O
O0 ° o, I I ° i I ° ~ I I ° I I I I N i~ N I ~ N i I N I I I I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ i w ~ ~ ~
( ' A ~ I R ' I A ~ ' ~ ~ I I 1 `n~ I 5 6 0. 6 ~n 5~ n I I I z
~ ~ II t I ~ I o, ~ = I I I ~ ~10 _ a,
20~ i i O1 ~ { ~ i o i I ~I A I' I . i °i i I ~ ~ ~ I i ~ I ~ N 'n N N ~ I I
67 • ~ 68 - ~ 69 • ~ ~ ~ U EXCAVA I~ U EXCAVA ~ I I U EXCAVA ;p i I c+ U X D ~ I
I I 20 R 8'~CO N I ~ WUFS~ BI~ N ( ~ COUR9SS BLOC N ( I 5 C URSE3 BLO ~ I i ~ ~ ~ 20' X 8' CONC. ~ I 20' % B° CONC. . ~ ~ 20' CONC. E'fG. I 1 i I ~ I ~ ~j i I ~ I 1 I
I I ~ I ~ f ~ o> I I ~ I i ~ I I ~ I I I I I I
~ I I ~ i I I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 31 , ~ 44 ~ ~ 53 ~ ~ 64 ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I
~ r 36 47 58 ; ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i I I I I
I i ~ ~ I ~ 5 ~ I I ~ I I I
I I 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ I I 27i i 33 ; i ; i ; i~ ~ ~ ~ ~i 43 ~ i ~ 55 62~~ r 65 11 ~~1
~ ii3~~ ii ii ~~5ii ii5`~~ ii ~ i i ii ''63;i. i i ~
Q ' ~ ~ ~ ( 'O~ ' ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ p ~ ' ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ p
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ( f I ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~i ii ii ~ i ~i ii ' i 50~i ii ii i~ i i ~ I I I in
' ~ ' -3 se ~ ~ _9 ~ ' 42~ sa ~ 48 ~ ' --56i sa ' ' 9 ss ~61 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 66 i i I I
~ ~ i i i i i i
° ~ __--J ° i '-4" 3°-6" 10'-4" i i '-4° 3'-6° 10'-4" i '-4" 3'-6° 10'-3" i i 10'-5° 3'-6° '-4° i I ° ~ o I
~ I I-- 2 5p s ~ I- -I I'- -I , ~ ~ ~_~}u I I ~ in ~112 ~
fILL j ~ o ~ FILL ~ , c p ~ FILL ~ c 0 2 5 ~ FlLL ~ ~ ___...J ( i x ,i ~ L_,_.__J ~ -J ~ l___.~_J ~-J~e ~ ( ( 4 i lp ~ L____ ~L I 1-21 o I i ~ I 4 o I I 1-2 I I 1 ~
~ ^ ~ r-----~ ~ ~ r-----~ I I I r---- a N r
N I I i ~ ~ I I ~ ~ i i I I N ' i i~38 ° i i'49 ~ 51 i i i~ ~ W ~ ~
25 40 , 60 13 ~ ~ 72 , ~ ~ 73 , 74 , ~ 71 ~ I UN CAV TED ~ ~ UN CAV TED ( UNE CA4 D ~ _ ~
UNEXCAVAIED ~ ~ I~ ~ I I ~ ( ~ I ~ Q
~ I I ~ ~ i I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ i i i ~
p ( ~ p ~ I ( ~ ~ I ( g ~ ~ ~ I R . ~ ( ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O I
o I ~ o ~ I I ~ ~ I I o i i i ~ O ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I i I ~ O
~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ i I t ~
23 20 i~ i i i i~ ' 24 ~22 ~ 21_------- 19 ~ 18-------- 16-------- --15--------- ' o - 14 O
~ 16'-3 M.O. ~ ~ i6'-3 M.O. ~ ( i6'- M.O. t-3" N. . ~ - _ _ _ - -LE~CE - ' 8R GE B IGE _ -____-_BRI
_ a O N N a-~
5'-8° 9'-5° 10'-3° 6~-4° 9'-5° 10'-3° 6~-4' 9'-2° 10~~10" 9'-5° 10'-3° 0 d'
8° ~Q. O O y ~ ~
Q ~ _ . . - - -0
. _ . _ z _ . - p . c ~
N D'
GEOPIER SOIL REINCEMENT PLAN O ~ O J"; U (,N~
SCALE. I O'~=~ ~-~n v ~ ~ ~ ~ Y
/ ~ ~ ~ g
_ o L
~ ~
~ ~
GEOPIER NOTES.
1, The design, locatian, size, and spacing of the Geo ier Foundation system are describetl on this drawin and tletails. Any modi ication in size and spacing of the SCHEDULE OF 3099 GEQPIER E~EMENTS
Geopier element layout s all not be allowed without approval by the system designer
(Geopier Foundation Company-Midwest Charles Aligood 763-592-5340). REQUIRED CENTERLINE OF GEOPIER ELEMENT. ~ E o
GEOPIER TOP OF GEOPIER N Ff TH ~ o~o
2. Should any obstruction, including but not limited to boulders, timbers, concrete, 1 THRU 66 -4'-4° 10'-0" o =
asphalt, large roots, etc. be encountered which prevent placing the element to the ~
requ~red depth, or causes the aggregate pser to drift from the requ~retl location, the 67 THRU 74 -0'-5° 10'-0" 3~ o =
obstruction shall be removed b the General Contractor, The e~cavation shall be Y TOP OF GEOPIER_ VARIES ~ o
back filled by the General.Contractor with suitable materials and sufficiently compacted, m order to continue with msfiallation of the aggregate pier. ~ ~ ~ w
z
If wet, soft or sensitive soils are present at bottom of pier excavation, open graded aggregate
shall be placed and compacted to stabilize the pier bottom and may serve as the ~nit~al lift. ~ = II1=
4. The center of each aggregate pier shall be within 6 inches of the planned location ~ I I 1= ~
indicated, unless a rovetl b the s stem desi ner. Foundation elements instailed PP Y Y 9
outside of the above tolerance and deemed not to be acceptable, shall be rebuilt W ~ W~ =1 I ' ~ ~
at no additionai ez ense to Owner. Other remedial measures ma be used as P Y ~ ~ ~ 30"~ X
approved by the system designer. ~ 10 feet minimum, and shouid penetrate through the , I GEOPIER EIEMENT
existing fil~ into underlying day at least 2 feet Q= ~
5. La out of all a re ate ier locatians shall be conducted b a ualified . . Y , 99 9 P Y q _ W I
- surveyor retamed by the General Contractor. y o~ ~
6. Footin areas shall be ro erl re ored followin excavation and rior to concrete 9 .P PP. 9. P ~ ~ ~
placement. All excava ~ons or foot~ng battoms directly supported by oggregate a I ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~
p~ers shall be prepared as follows: o I d' ~ _ i ~ T ~ ~
A. The excavation shall be limited to 3 inches below the bottom of footin 9 ~ ~ ~ M a v o ~
elevation, excavation shall be accomplished using a smooth bucket. BOTfOM BULB o~ y v
B. The disturbed surface soils and to of ier elements shall be P P ~ - U O c ,d
recompacted in accordance with recommendations of the geotechnical ~ .p ~ O
engineer. Durin wet conditions, where compaction is not achievable, TYPICAL SECTION @ GEOPIER ELEMENTS ~ a-~ M
all disturbed soi s shall be removed. ~ ~O~I
C. A standard impact compactor such as a"whacker or jumping jack" L ~ ~ ~
shall be used to compact the loose surface of the aggregate pier. N C ~ .p ~ ~
C.~ v
D. A11 foundations bearing surfaces shall be observed and approved by the
geotechnical engineer pr~or to placement of concrete. _ ~
7. All obove and below ground utilities shali be located, clearly marked, and relocated
as necessary prior to mstaliation of Geop~er elements.
8. The ollowable design bearing pressure for this Geopier project is up to 4,500 PSF. DATE
I hereby certifv that this plan, specification ,or report s I, . I.=e
~y\\ a was prepared by e g u der my direct sup ision D AFTS N
~ 0. Al~GO a t t I pH a d I is red Professional En meer ~ ..nd he State of rinnrsoto JCF
IiCENSEo ~SHEET NUMBER
~ ~ao PROFESSIONAI ENGINEER _ C arles M. Allgood, r. DA E
; cp 23692 GEO 1 0
Reg. No. 23692 SCALE OFo~~\\ Pages or sheets covered by this seaL•
PROJECT NUMBER
i