2040 Cliff Rd - 2002 Soils Testing - Braun IntertecAUN
I NTE RTEC
lLlvs"!1 16
An Excavation Observation, Compaction Testing
and Special Inspection Report for
Magnum Development Corporation
Hadler Park Building
2040 Cliff Road
Eagan, Minnesota
? 15 C
foH 1 2 zoo2
Providing engineerzng and environmental soludons since 1957
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Engineer under the laws of the
State of Mmnesota.
Associate Principal
Regisuation Number: 24017
Project BODX-02-171 C
December 10, 2002
Braun Intertec Corporation
BRAUN Bwun IMertec Corporation Phone 952 431.4493
I NTERTEC 6950 West 1461h Sfreet I Fox. 952 437 3084
Surtel37 Web brauninfetleccom
Apple Volley, MN 55124
December 10, 2002
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83`d Plaza ?
Omaha, IVE 68124
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Project BODX-02-171C
Re: Excavation Observarions, Compaction Testing and Special Inspection Report, Hadler Park
Building, Eagan, Minnesota
This report summazizes the results of our excavation observations, compaction testing, and special
inspection observations performed from August 1, 2002 to September 30, 2002, at the Aadler Park
Building in Eagan, Minnesota.
The purpose of the excavation observations was to evaluate the suitability of the excavation bottom
soils for support of the proposed building. The purpose of the compaction testing was to evaluate
the suitability of the fill placed for building support.
The observations and testing were performed to meet the general requirement of the 1997 edition of
the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Secrion 1701, Special Inspections and the projects specifications
by an International Conference of Buildmg Officials (ICBO) certified special inspector and engineer
in training (EM special inspector. The work was done under the direcrion of a professional
engineer registered in the State of Minnesota.
Available Infarmation
GME Consultants, Inc., performed soil borings for the proposed Hadler Pazk Building. The
results were submitted in their "Geotechnical Evaluation RepoR" dated Apnl 10, 2002 under
GME project number 9871.
We were provided with a set of plans ritled, "Hadler Park", which were prepared by C.M.
Architecture, P.A., and were dated April 15, 2002.
Offset staldng of the building comers were set in the field by Dazland Construcrion. Braun Intertec
excavarion oversizing measurements, bottom of excavation elevations and compachon test locarions and
elevations were referenced to those stakes. The exact location of the building is the responsibility of
others.
Providing engineertng and environmental soiuaons since 1957
Magnum Development Corporation
Project BODX-02-171C
December 10, 2002
Page 2
Excavation Observations
The excavation observarions were conducted by a Level II Engineering Technician under the direct
supervision of the project engineer. The excavation observations consisted of observing the soils
exposed in the bottom and sidewalls of the excavation. The approximate density or consistency of
the soils encountered in the excavation bottom were judged by the force required to advance
random, shallow (about 1 to 3 feet deep) hand auger probes. Soil classifications were determined in
the field using the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures by examining
the hand auger probe cuttings.
A backhoe and dozer was used to excavate the foundation area. About 1 foot of topsoil and existing
fill soils were removed from the building. The depths of the fill soils ranged from about 6 to 9 feet.
The soils encountered in the excavation bottom were silty sand judged to be in a mediwn dense to
dense condirion. Poorly graded sands were placed in thin lifts and then compacted with a lazge
vibratory compactor.
Based on the offset staking, it appears the excavation was adequately oversized. Based on the
results of the borings and excavarion observations, it is our opinion the excavation bottom soils are
suitable for fill and building support.
Compaction Testing
Project specificarions required that the engineered fill used to backfill the foundafions, walls, and
foundation subgrades throughout the site be placed in thin lifts and thoroughly compacted. Fill
placed £or foundation support was to be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of standard Proctor
maximum dry density (ASTM D 698),
During this period, 25 compaction tests (1 to 25) were performed. The compaction test results are
attached to this report for your records.
Concrete Reinforcement
The concrete reinforcement observations were conducted on an as-needed basis by an ICBO
certified special inspector for reinforced concrete or an American Concrete Institute (ACn certified
level II technician. To conduct the observations, the special inspector reviewed the project
structural drawings and the available shop drawings. The information included bar size, 6ar length,
bar spacing and bar locations. Other items such as clearance, splice length and dowel placements
were also included. The information was then used in the field to document the "as-6uilt"
canditions.
Magnum Development Corporation
Project BODX-02-171C
December 10, 2002
Page 3
As azeas of work were reviewed, various items were compared to the struchual drawings. If the area
of observed reinforcement did not conform to the structural drawings, the contractor was notified of
the required additions and/or concems.
Based on the results of our observations and available plans, it is our opinion that the reinforcement
observed has been placed in general accordance with project plans and specifications.
Concrete Testing and Observations
The concrete tesring and ohservations were performed by an ICBO certified special inspector for
reinforced concrete or an American Concrete Institute (ACI) certified level II technician.
Observarion and testing of the footing concrete was performed on August 8, 2002, and consisted of
determining slump, temperature and air content as the concrete was discharged from the truck. We
also observed the contractor's concrete placement procedures for compliance with industry
standards. Concrete test cylinders were cast by the contractor for the slab-on-gade concrete pour.
A total of 2 sets of concrete test cylinders were cast for evaluation of compressive strength of the
concrete.
Review of the 28-day test results indicate the concrete represented Uy these cylinders has met or
exceeded the specified minimum 28-day compressive strength. The concrete tested should be
considered acceptable based on the requirements of the plans and specifications. The results of the
compressive strength tests were previously forwarded and are attached to this report.
Structural Steel Observations
Observations of the shuctural steel construction were performed by an ICBO certified special
inspector for structural steel or a level II technician qualified in accordance with American Society
for Nondestructive Testing (ASIVT'), publication SNT-TC-lA.
Based on the results of our observations, it is our opinion that the smzctural steel ohserved is in
general accordance with project plans and specifications.
General Remarks
This report contains only findings and results arrived at after employing specific test procedures and
standazds listed herein. It is not intended to constitute a recommendation, endorsement or
certification of the product or material tested.
Services performed by Braun Intertec for this project have been conducted with that level of caze
and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under
similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
If you have any questions regarding this report
contact Rob Golish or Greg Bialon at (952) 431
Sincerely,
Braun Intertec Corporation
( "Ze/X4 ?'
Robert A. Golish, ETl'
Staff Engineer
Grego Zn, P??
Associate Principal
Mr. Craig Novacyk; Eagan Building v
Mr. D.J. Heinle; C.M. Architecture, P.
Attachments:
Excavation Observation Sketch 1
Report of Field Compaction Tests, Reports 1 tku
Proctor Curve, P-1
Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinders, Sets 1
Daily Observations Reports, 1 and 2
Special inspector Daily Reports, 1 and 2
Certified Mill Test Report
rag/gjb:skg\02171cUpt
Magnum Development Corporation
Project BODX-02-171C
December 10, 2002
Page 4
if we can be of further assistance to you, please
??'
r15 Fee Overs i ize
.
tv
Oversize `--
903 f 0 j ?908 10 JP
i
PROPOS M BUI -ii'DING ?
,
,
850 - 5 SF ?
I
916.0
,
i 904 i 905 i 908 10
i ,
i ?
i d
? I
1
?? qe << 1
1 1 j k?
I 1 ?
I =
i a lo
i ?.
906 ? 905 lk 1908 Q 10 Feet
i ? . . Oversize
0 Feet o rsize i? DRIVE --?HRU
? ; ? 915
c UPAWN BV? RAG 12 6/02 Excavation Observation Sketch BRM V p![ i? °
? Hadler Park Building ??
? APP'0 BY: ?$ 2020 Cliff Road ,oB No. BoDX-02-171C ' I NTE RTEC
DWG.Na. SNEET or IDagan, Minnesota , SGI.E ],"=20' 1 1
BRAUN Bwun Inhrfee Corpowtien Phone: 952 431.4493
6950 West 146ih Sheet I Fax952 431 3084
INTERTEC $uiVe131 Web' brauninlertec.com
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Report of Field Compaction Tests
Date: December 5, 2002
Project: BODX-02-171C
Report: 1
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83rd Plaza
Omaha, NE 68124
Project Description:
Consiruction Materials Testing
Aadler Pazk Retail Building
2020 Cliff Road
Eaean_ Nlinnesota
est
ate
ype
Soil
ID and
Classification
Oprimum
Moisture*
(°/a) Max. Lab
Dry Density*
(Std.Proc.)
(pcf)
Inplace
Moisture
(%) Inplace
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Rela6ve
Compacrion
(%) Specified
MInimum
Compact.
(%)
omments
1 8/7/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 108.3 6 106 98 98 A
2 8/7102 N P-1: SP I5.0 1083 6 106 98 98 A
3 8/7/02 N P-I: SP 15.0 1083 5 106 98 98 A
4 8/7/02 N P-I: SP 15.0 1083 6 108 100 98 A-
5 8/7/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 5 107 99 98 A
Key: N= Nucleaz, ASTM D 2922
SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556
*= O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1
A= Test results comply with specifications.
B= Test results do not comply with specificarions.
C= Test results meet zero air voids critena.
Test Test Location Elevation
1 15'S, 10'E of NW building comer 905
2 20'E of NVJ building corner 905
3 35'S, 5'E ofNW building comer 907
4 10'N, 20'E of SW building comer 907
5 25'N, SS'E of SW building comer 908
Braun Intertec Corporarion
??
Robert A. Golish, El
Staff Engineer
Providing engineeTing and envrronmental soLutions since 1957
sRAUN BwunlnfedecCorporalien Phone 952 4314493
6950 West 146ih Street Fax 952.431 3084
INTERTEC Sude131 Web 6?auninterteccom
Apple Volley, MN 55124
Report of Field Compaction Tests
Date: December 5, 2002
Project: BODX-02-171C
Report: 2
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporafion
3023 South 83`a Plaza
Omaha, NE 68124
Project Description:
Conslruction Materials Testing
Hadier Paxk Retail Building
2020 Cliff Road
Ea2an, Minnesota
est
ate
ype
Soil
ID and
Classification
Opfimum
MoisWre*
(%) Max. Lab
Dry Density*
(Std.Proc.)
(pc])
Inplace
Moisture
(%) Inplace
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Relative
Compaction
(%) Speci£ed
Minimum
Compact.
(%)
omments
6 8/8/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 109 101 98 A
7 8/8/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 107 99 98 A
8 8/8(02 N P-1: SP 15.0 108.3 7 107 99 98 A
9 8/8102 N P-1: SP 15A 1083 7 108 100 98 A
10 8(8(02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 108 100 98 A
Key: N= Nuclear, ASTM D 2922
SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556
*= O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1
A= Test results comply with specifications.
B= Test results do not comply with specifications.
C= Test results meet zero air voids criteria.
Test Test Location Elevation
6 25'S, 60'E ofNW building comer 909
7 15'N, 45'E of SW building comer 909
8 5' S, 25' W of NE building comer 911
9 10'N, 20' W of SE building comer 911
10 20'N, 30' W of SE building comer 911
Elevation Reference:
Braun Intertec Corporation
20?/ fz I
Robert A. Golish, ETT
Staff Engineer
oznto\Css-z
Provzding engineering and environmensal solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Bwun Interfec Corporalion
6950 West 146ih 5lreet
Surte 131
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Phone 952 431 4493
iox952.4313084
Webbraunintertecmm
Report of Field Compaction Tests
Date: December 5, 2002
Project: BODX-02-171C
Report: 3
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83`' Plaza
Omaha, NE 68124
Project Description:
Consh-ucrion Matenals Testing
Aadler Park Retail Building
2020 CliffRoad
Eaean, Minnesota
est
ate
ype
Soil
ID and
Classification
Optimum
Moisture*
(%) Max. Lab
Dry Density*
(Std.Proc.)
(pcf)
Inplace
Moisture
(%) Inplace
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Rela6ve
Compaction
(%) Specified
Minimum
Compact.
(%)
omments
11 8/9/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 7 106 98 98 A
12 8/9102 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 7 106 98 98 A
13 8/9/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 7 109 101 98 A
14 8/9/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 107 99 98 A
15 8/9/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 7 107 99 98 A
16 8/9/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 106 98 98 A
Key: N= Nuclear, ASTM D 2922
SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556
"= O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1
A= Test results comply with specifications.
B= Test results do not comply with specifications.
C= Test results meet zero au voids criteria.
Test Test Location Elevation
11 15'S, 30'W of NE building comer 913
12 35'S, 50'W of NE building corner 913
13 10'N, 25'E of SW building comer 913
14 5'S, 10'E ofNW building corner 915
15 25'S, 30'E of NW building corner 915
16 40'S, 20' W of NE building corner 915
Elevation Reference:
Braun Intertec Corporation
Robert A. Golish, EI'I'
Staff Engineer
02171cku3
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
sRAuN
INTERTEC
Report of Field Compaction Tests
Date: December 5, 2002
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83'd Plaza
nmaha NE 68124
Bnun Interlec Corporalion
6950 West 146ih Straet
Suite 131
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Project: BODX-02-171C
Project Description:
Construction Materials Testing
Hadler Park Retail Building
2020 C1iffRoad
Eaean: Minnesota
Phone' 952 431.4493
Fax9524313084
Web. braunintertec rom
Report: 4
est
ate
ype
Soil
ID and
Classification
Optimum
Moisture*
(%) Max. Lab
Dry DeusiTy*
(Std.Proc.)
(pcf)
Inplace
Moisture
(%) Inplace
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Relafive
Compaction
(%) Speci£ied
Minimum
Compact.
(%)
omments
17 9/5/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 7 105 97 95 A
18 9/5/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 107 99 95 A
19 9/5/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 108.3 6 104 96 95 A
20 9/5/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 105 97 95 A
21 9/12/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 104 96 95 A
22 9/12/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 5 104 96 95 A
23 9/12/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 5 106 98 95 A
Key: N= Nucleaz, ASTM D 2922
SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556
*= O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1
A= Test results comply with specifications.
B= Test results do not comply with specifications.
C= Test results meet zero air voids criteria.
Test Test Location Elevatiou
ll Interior wall backfill, Cmd C.S, 1 914
18 Interior wall backfill, Grid A, 2.4 914
19 Exterior wall backfill, Gxid A.3, 1 974
20 Exterior wall bacldll, Grid A, 5 914
21 Intenor wall backfill, Grid B, 6 915
22 Interior wall baclill, Grid D, 4.5 915
23 Interior wall backfill, Grid D, 2 915
Elevatian Reference:
Braun Intertec Corporation
?
Robert A. Golish, EI'I'
Staff Engineer
02171c\cts-4
Providing engneering and environmental solutions sin,
BRAUN 8wunlnferle<Corporation Phone: 9524374493
INTERTEC avsowest iaerhso-eer I Fax: 952.4313084
Surte 731 Web. bmunintertecmm
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Report of Field Compaction Tests
Date: December 5, 2002
Project: BODX-02-171C
Report: 5
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83rd Plaza
Omaha,lVE 68124
Project Description:
Construcrion Materials Testing
Hadler Pazk Retail Building
2020 Cliff Road
Eaean. Minnesota
est
ate
ype
Soil
ID and
Classification
Optimum
Moisture*
(%) Max. Lab
Dry Density*
(Std.Proc.)
(pcf)
Eaplace
Moisture
(%) Inplace
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Relative
Compaction
(%) Speci£ed
Minimum
Compact.
(%)
omments
24 9/12/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 6 106 98 95 A
25 9/12/02 N P-1: SP 15.0 1083 5 105 97 95 A
Key: N= Nuclear, ASTM D 2922
SC= Sand Cone, AS'I'M D 1556
*= O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1
A= Test results comply with specifications.
B= Test results do not comply with specifications.
C= Test results meet zero air voids criteria.
Test Test Lacation Elevation
24 Exterior wall backfill, Grid D, 3.5 915
25 Exterior wall backfill, Grid C, 6 915
Elevation Reference:
Braun Intertec Corporation
,
Robert A. Golish, ETT
Staff Engineer
azt7lckts-5
Providing engineering and environmental sotuttons since 1957
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS
109
I
107
I
ZAV for
Sp.G. _
2
45
105 .
U
a
N
C
?
?
a
?
103
I
I I
I
101 I I I
99 I I
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Water content, %
Test speafication: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure C Standazd
Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %<
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL P? 314 in. No.200
SP 2.45
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Maximum
dry density = 108.3 pcf
Optimum moisture = 15.0 % SP-POORLY GRADED SAND, FINE
GRAINED, BROWN
Project No. BODX02171CCIient: HADLER PARK, EAGAN, MN.
Project:
• Location: EAGAN, MN Remarks:
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS
BRAUN INTERTEC
Figure P_1
BRAUN Broun InMrtec Corporafion Phone: 952 431 4493
6950 West 146th Streel Fox- 952 431 3084
INTERTEC Smfe131 We6 braumnferteccom
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" x 12" Cylinder
Date:
December 6, 2002
Client:
Mr. John Hughes
Magnum Development Corporation
3023 South 83' Plaza
ProjectNumber: BODX-02-171C
Project Description:
Construction Materials Testing
Hadler Park Retail Building
2020 Cliff Road
Nh b251L4
;LD DATA:
Number:
e Cast:
ie Cast:
asured Slump:
asured Air:
icrete Temperature:
Temperature:
inder Cast By:
uid Added at Site:
;mle Location:
1
8/13/02
1:OD p.m
3Yz" .
1.9%
83°F
74°F
BDN
None
Footings, Grid 6, A to C
* Damaged in field
rvnnnesow
IIGN DATA:
Design:
ied Air:
ied Strength:
or Ticket No.:
lers Per Set:
303N1
Aggregate Indushies
None Specified
3000
205
4
Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Gy1 Area Cornpressive Remazks
SazrroleNo Recvd Date Clue Ore Aee (nounds) (sain) S4enethnsi Code(s)
lA 8/15 8/20 2 5 7 28.27 * *
1B 8/15 9/10 2 26 28 137670 28.27 4870 E
1C 8/15 9/10 2 26 28 139090 28.27 4920 E
ID 81I5 9/10 HOLD
Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi)• 3000
Remarks:
E: The average 28-day tes[ results meets or exceeds the specified strength.
Braun Intertec Corporation
?
32obert A. Golish, ETT
Staff Engineer
02171acoric-1
Providing engineenng and environmental solunons since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: AST'M C 39, 6" x 12" Cylinder
Date: October24, 2002 ProjectA'umber:
BODX-02-171C
Client: Project Description:
Mr. John Hughes Construction Matenals Testing
Magnum Development Corporation Hadler Park Retail Building
3023 South 83"' Plaza 2020 C1iff Road
Phone 952 431 4493
Fax952 431 3084
Web 6rounlniertec com
Omaha, NE 68124 Eagan, Minnesota
IELD DATA: ESIGN DATA:
Set Number: 2 ix Design: Not given
ateCast: 9/24/02 Supplier: NoTgiven
Tune Cast: Not given Specified Air: Not given
easured Slump: Not given Specified Sfrength: 3500
easured Air: Not given mck or Ticket No.: Not given
Concrete Temperature: Not given Cylinders Per Set: 3
Air Temperature: Not given
Cylinder C`ast By: Contractor
iquid Added at Site: Not given
Saznple Location: S]ab-on-gade
ield Notes:
Date TesY Field Lab Test Max I.oad Cy1.4iea Compressive Rexnarics
Sample Iv'o. Recvd Date (,lire C,lire Age (pounds) (sq in) Sfreneth, osi Code(s)
2A 9/25 10/1 1 6 7 118380 2827 4190 D
2B 9/25 10/22 1 27 28 153540 2827 5430 E
2C 9/25 10/22 1 27 28 15519 28.27 5490 E
Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3500
Remarks:
D: The 7-day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
E: Tle average 28-day test results meets or exceeds the specified strength.
02171c?conc-2
Braun Infertec Corpomfion
6950 West 146th Streel
Smte 131
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Bmun Intertec Corporarion
Robert A. Golish, ETl'
Staff Engineer
Pravidrng engineering and enviTOnmental solutions since 1957
s Rau N=M
INTERTEC
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT
Project #: &L C1?G 2-1 '1I L Report#: sfl I ir 5 ( 1)
Locat9on: NF}Dt.-t_ PR2-K Date: ??- (z, ' oZ-
EA6&-.5 , Mr.S
Personnel
Classification Regular
Hours Overtime
Hours
t2- . -T'C
Areas and work performed this day: n C3=StR-Vd? L3 c;.LT?M SD i LS
fw- P(z-OPDSe?D 94411-Dla/fs MP. StattS C.a3rsSlS'f"C? P1(,l"R4W
G?F s,Lcy SRnrps rN .4 T-E) DErJ..SJ5' C?as??rrnn?.
I?UfG T af 7y?PSoiL i?ILc- d-)2y-s Q-t??/I-zr>vE0 E2-fl/tn
E&r .Sl!)f? nF qLli LD/.i1is tlr'Afi 70 g ?E? ? Qc ?D/SO/L
r1 t- [, oN T?/E wCST S%po. &5-xG4vA Ti p.cJ t,/,9-S L,tY?E
JnIiTd A' "1<1106 rbyO AqzE;? Arvv1? WA5 f%?-t??4t?
0119?SIZeo ?6 A 7YJlWI~/YI f f/ //Awp
AL1fs6f? I-OXV/SK5 W4;q,6 &r1,0kGT9b O.v 92778M SoILS
&vQ ! fe?y f'?Lx+?- fl"?Tilgo- Sk I7-ARL.'er- ?L*L1L0>/?G-
? ??'?T ?'? ?K?
Weather: ?L?.? ?'if?S Performed B,v??
Submitted To:
F: DAILY 1
DOF-01
s Rau N=M
INTERTEC
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT
Project #: &Q4Xp 2-f? 1e- Report #: ZFI1O6Di?JitT?- 1,2?
Location: 11A21-Eti' ,?'/}/eYC Date: 17Ls5L02
??d?, m?? ? ,
Personnel
Classification Regular
Hours Overtime
Hours
L?JI? . T
Areas and work performed this day: &1W11LW
60o ri??e- s ??' ? D S f}
!
?1
-? AEiA/I`DRC?n/fr 04 f-/Z/sn& Ts?
N L- ,
,
?
fl 4 X I"Z. p vJ f-rr? 40?T ei>,cr7-
1?q.ns : Ey ,
rd
-7*S e • W•
F5 ? 54-
& X/ Z " y?? ?, v? ?
C"e ? ? B?;i? rb
h/???n?F??c ?.v c.. ?
AL 1- REi.vroACiNlr AAcEn iiv 6€NY?AC- ??Goas-rA>VL?
1411 v-i?/ t'l.?AvS A SAEC' S
Weather: Pc, 70c5 Performed By:
?
Submitted To: PAW L w' F: DAILY 1
DOR-01
f
B RA V N y Special Inspector Daily Report Page l of
I NTE RTEC City of
Report Number. 5Q?1*1 Date of This Report: 17- (a ??.
0
Projec[ Name: Project No.: ?oDX?ol.
Project Address:
ClienC Client Project No.:
Weather: Temperature: X%C
Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Rebar Placement ? Foundations
? Periodic Vf Weiding ? Concrete Placement ? Fiteproofing
16 Boltin ? Tendon Placement ? Other
Did the architect or en ineer authorize chanes to cit a roved lans? Yes ?(Listed Below) No ?
De,CC?ription and location ef work completed:
V (?
D4I' 1,01.v 11- p %X\9,j' v.Te.Qs) wA' '9 t7J- If'J'p-
Q?1 ?-
`? TeN..si --, 13o t)t G,; ak A- c r. c?
R_
?
Cu_ +- Llr rl..---r
IC'
o ?2 C.E,y% u6-2
I?,. ,,,?r c en= ?e I h Pj Pd
? t)Pr~?. ???.,r. 7.il s'!-eP 1 1'io l ds are A 30-7 3(.k51_
- J
6?
• Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's o6sernations? Ye^s? N?? ?
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes l_)" No ?
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the be.et of our knowledge, work inspected was done in xccordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted ahove.
Signed: Date:
Print Full Name: t.D. fYumhar. _ ?C)';-t4 L1"??a _
(White copy to Braun Intenec file. Yel(ow copy to General Contractor. )
Gm\specrosp 4 112?5795
B RA`1 N'°
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Projea Address:
Client:
W eather:
Specia( Inspector Daily Report Page ` of ?
-,
City of L C, 5 ou-. _
5.?.,-up}2,,,G ( S t-?,Q_k"" ,)- Date of This Report: q_i&- a Z
Project No.- R?i DtC^a?- 17 t L
Client Project No.:
Tempecature:
Type of ]nspection: Inspection Coverage:
? Continuous ? Masonry ? Rebar Placement ? Foundations
? Periodic JZ Welding ? Concrete Placement ? Fireptoo£ng
? Boltin ? Tendon Placement ? Other
Did the azchitect or en ineer authorize chanes to cit a roved lans? Yes ?(L.isted Below) No ?
Description and location ef work completed:
o`-1-
-fl ?-t.. -
J
Fu. c,l\ Z. (3l
Aacv pVS7 , ptd b Rz W.._k-?O.
List tests performed:
• Are there any, discrepancies noted from this d3y's observatiuns? Ye,s ? Nn
• Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ? No
• If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the bes[ of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approveci plans, specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted ahove.
Signed: - 1?Date:
Print Full Name: (.D Numher. tSN U4 S'-?'b
(White copy to Braun Intertec fi1e. Yellow capy to Generat Contractor.)
Crm\spccinspA I/25ry5